{"meta":{"query_hash":"a134245ebfc1","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a134245ebfc1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Competition+Law+%26+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W2020229934","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhl001","title":"THE FAILURE OF COMPETITIVE ENTRY INTO FIXED-LINE TELECOMMUNICATIONS: WHO IS AT FAULT?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Telecommunications; Business; Broadband; Local loop; Telecommunications service; Service (business); Industrial organization; International trade; Commerce; Finance; Marketing; Engineering","score_opus":0.00584321678444757,"score_gpt":0.2159126034416818,"score_spread":0.21006938665723424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020229934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95823044,0.00139438,0.00042258677,0.0036562157,0.00033600384,0.000092329305,0.0000579933,0.000026045273,0.035784006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960692,0.0024510776,0.00061941735,0.00023387202,0.00029676055,0.0000018085011,0.00001684343,0.000019407127,0.00029162475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991216,0.000033263623,0.00060404884,0.000029917213,0.0000655705,0.00014558011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990503,0.00023086295,0.00031083374,0.00022472293,0.00013521357,0.000048037768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017529789,0.0001157012,0.0002497056,0.00005965815,0.00017117565,0.00005673041,0.00027869406,0.000063411055,0.000103544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000081371945,0.000099169025,0.0001419533,0.000056731886,0.00014187416,0.00021223289,0.000040095798,0.00019571492,0.000022798788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005754449,0.00007865185,0.000641426,0.000061289575,0.00020182882,8.332813e-7,0.0019636117,0.07363569,0.0027374183,0.9088077,0.01133877,0.00047526998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008661674,0.00013406473,0.0019098974,0.00015747838,0.000052727315,0.00009727331,0.0012742134,0.0048829922,0.033748444,0.012272591,0.9443618,0.00024233006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006985434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009996583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93302304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017777579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028321952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40439954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086571715","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhn023","title":"CHANGING THE PRESUMPTION OF WHEN TO REGULATE: THE RATIONALE OF CANADIAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS REFORM","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Regulator; Regulatory reform; Business; Process (computing); Telecommunications; Industrial organization; Economics; Market economy; Engineering; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0418926697198889,"score_gpt":0.21618546344877723,"score_spread":0.17429279372888834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086571715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8682931,0.0001506162,0.00043226397,0.03996086,0.00032908763,0.0002915454,0.000008036892,0.000007380803,0.09052708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756026,0.00014756335,0.00044194827,0.0013089557,0.00031122688,0.0000046636164,0.0000065753006,0.0000058853298,0.0002129159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993636,0.000011579845,0.00041509242,0.000044263485,0.00007681191,0.000088663626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886286,0.000037675687,0.0005593325,0.00019866538,0.0003297986,0.000011638118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035201194,0.000056340694,0.00013635683,0.0002594772,0.00038476282,0.00003462637,0.00027927427,0.000018425033,0.00009873348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016522987,0.000038814243,0.000079657424,0.0002011719,0.00010726181,0.00041152386,0.000049282837,0.00006759928,0.0000119818405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022815098,0.000022076681,0.00060489896,0.000015122373,0.00004582189,1.8008242e-7,0.00069209316,0.008233306,0.00008149204,0.98838353,0.0015021269,0.00039654408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005800209,0.00003242946,0.09697374,0.00014181827,0.000061015617,0.000036403613,0.0036442662,0.0035019487,0.00042608392,0.031875327,0.86255705,0.00016990109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025123486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022008503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9565082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007098931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049191738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088577216","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhn008","title":"AN ANALYSIS OF PRICE-BASED TESTS OF ANTITRUST MARKET DELINEATION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Market definition; Econometrics; Industrial organization; Market structure","score_opus":0.04764232762080844,"score_gpt":0.23715613262558718,"score_spread":0.18951380500477874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088577216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9832512,0.00018541966,0.00869287,0.00017142121,0.00020446394,0.00007247097,0.0003705996,0.000005636309,0.007045903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553925,0.00046577008,0.0034674888,0.00028014067,0.00013409439,9.575436e-7,0.000050366758,0.000015559242,0.00004635564],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770945,0.00003402896,0.0018727246,0.00017565215,0.00003224378,0.0001758696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664223,0.00011473572,0.0026937753,0.00032916365,0.000094551375,0.00012551669],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083653914,0.00014181228,0.0009409522,0.0007860317,0.00006784767,0.000021803726,0.00026440178,0.000100145015,0.0014581806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043847464,0.00017250788,0.00043797513,0.00023199133,0.00013909166,0.0006407932,0.000012476068,0.00011847566,0.00001623437],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002725993,0.0005237047,0.2686087,0.000044949524,0.00084080343,0.0000040107907,0.00023696417,0.5475635,0.00014533309,0.18137719,0.00024009627,0.00014217626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001892941,0.00064580917,0.43569916,0.00003574316,0.00026228552,0.00004279027,0.00005597064,0.54346156,0.0012329528,0.0051469593,0.011150893,0.00037290138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029759872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000106575164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17623024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001310278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058489226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093546243","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhn016","title":"UNLOCKING TECHNOLOGY: ANTITRUST AND INNOVATION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Interoperability; Incentive; Industrial organization; Business; Network effect; Interconnection; Lock (firearm); Economics; Telecommunications; Microeconomics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.020639740158091335,"score_gpt":0.1933653535362907,"score_spread":0.17272561337819936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093546243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9450736,0.000028082948,0.00017556988,0.00053156953,0.0003136321,0.000035734713,9.908222e-7,0.000018799663,0.053821992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754804,0.00009572289,0.0004302053,0.0013363252,0.00054314116,4.629953e-7,0.0000063998996,0.0000108076265,0.000028883805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993375,3.3958048e-7,0.00044740987,0.000078132936,0.000031522246,0.000105072766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991852,0.000010680566,0.00057398534,0.00006990832,0.00015261605,0.000007594881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016920571,0.000080726066,0.00018542346,0.00048544476,0.00014029136,0.00025279366,0.000098834804,0.000056104887,0.000041943673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018388975,0.00008301273,0.000036939477,0.00021848462,0.000098718294,0.0043173973,0.000053230357,0.00010959072,0.00003927884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014586235,0.000021302585,0.005654281,0.0000130256685,0.000015088815,0.000005201499,0.000004481486,0.0002737002,0.000043651173,0.99258596,0.0001426753,0.0012260362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015112581,0.000058456284,0.0060834074,0.000093945455,0.000032373715,0.000543897,0.00040715473,0.0030777133,0.00030872217,0.5720957,0.4154097,0.00037766978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008966542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016317023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42049026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003345883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018733695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33851612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521107722","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhw018","title":"OUT-OF-MARKET EFFICIENCIES, TWO-SIDED PLATFORMS, AND CONSUMER WELFARE: A LEGAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Digital Platforms and Economics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Consumer welfare; Order (exchange); Payment; Competition (biology); Treaty; Competition law; Welfare; Economic surplus; Rule of reason; Economic efficiency; Competition policy; Economics; Business; Public economics; Treaty of Rome; European union; Relevant market; Relevance (law); International economics; Market economy; Law; European integration; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.010155246502171325,"score_gpt":0.19896746648990973,"score_spread":0.1888122199877384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521107722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97003144,0.00006804283,0.00019645621,0.0005283423,0.00040764228,0.00006749105,0.00002528881,0.000009697359,0.0286656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988584,0.00019563158,0.00017733575,0.0003893808,0.00028030577,9.918216e-7,0.000006695192,0.000014396627,0.000076854165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880886,0.0000014885277,0.0007770737,0.00017336043,0.00004904531,0.0001901745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986497,0.00011187185,0.00097417494,0.0001398889,0.000080897466,0.00004344827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004921413,0.00016348969,0.00052250765,0.000312925,0.00010773616,0.0004996459,0.00015048952,0.000054694043,0.00033611656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027424736,0.000127498,0.00017073353,0.000058918784,0.0002191284,0.0048814192,0.00010155413,0.00007377749,0.000023807846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000145065,0.00003777381,0.006817733,0.000029889816,0.0003708765,0.0000032897437,0.0000132860605,0.0005844158,0.000041756055,0.98917043,0.00019841842,0.0025870502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0121455565,0.0002779569,0.036607206,0.00032972422,0.002051963,0.00019434509,0.0013534597,0.030776493,0.0003623198,0.1783708,0.7357942,0.0017360001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017197868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012541874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81079966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007761524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003670827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5199217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790153759","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhx030","title":"MOBILE PHONE REGULATION: THE EFFECTS OF PROHIBITING HANDSET BUNDLING IN FINLAND","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"ICT Impact and Policies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Handset; Tying; Business; Mobile phone; Mobile broadband; Quarter (Canadian coin); Advertising; Telecommunications; Wireless; Economics; Engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0053199277377677,"score_gpt":0.20793292165945298,"score_spread":0.20261299392168527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790153759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99344677,0.00022357024,0.0004852352,0.00004502947,0.0004666297,0.000070224414,0.0000022412864,0.000006424695,0.00525385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907476,0.00013680106,0.00015591306,0.000057995665,0.00053070334,0.0000016855305,0.0000012762134,0.000009719268,0.000031170635],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950045,0.000018674058,0.00033021704,0.000019316205,0.000035920602,0.000095431606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957013,0.00013076777,0.00015522377,0.00007106751,0.00004799745,0.000024833354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020933528,0.000060845196,0.00015746742,0.000057700447,0.00004097205,0.000027718483,0.000072768016,0.000033301996,0.000040255185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013692781,0.000050425213,0.000048012793,0.00004942034,0.00005949092,0.00016214394,0.000008745802,0.00009783175,0.000008238225],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004023764,0.0003083728,0.010183105,0.0016110123,0.00047002579,0.000010456857,0.04919915,0.5129913,0.12273894,0.2921475,0.0031600036,0.0067777373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0101129245,0.0032131092,0.05654201,0.0032949597,0.00019283146,0.0006727077,0.0029545736,0.13173573,0.6109492,0.041515104,0.13760105,0.0012157736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009307321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048195383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4882103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000474043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016095615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20562805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121837049","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhi005","title":"Did Mandatory Unbundling Achieve Its Purpose? Empirical Evidence from Five Countries","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":115,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unbundling; Competition (biology); Empirical evidence; Competition law; Economics; Political science; Library science; Regional science; Sociology; Computer science; Industrial organization; Philosophy; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05293927160882407,"score_gpt":0.2607306167524639,"score_spread":0.20779134514363984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121837049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9398266,0.008784621,0.012812668,0.012322924,0.0014338506,0.0001568671,0.00039033985,0.000040806874,0.024231289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867674,0.006171594,0.0020302923,0.0032833172,0.0012196735,0.000004864439,0.000025771938,0.000027127286,0.00046995038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762845,0.00005502001,0.0016513627,0.0003261368,0.00007633038,0.00026271312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766415,0.00026493505,0.0013719472,0.0003010515,0.00018414909,0.0002137621],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083154056,0.00021636419,0.0007711741,0.00027113679,0.00019400154,0.00024241126,0.00043230905,0.000128048,0.0051933215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007420872,0.0002540098,0.00042122608,0.00012786839,0.00010664215,0.0013177672,0.00006575303,0.00033895735,0.0014102889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020615548,0.00021590381,0.013679571,0.000026132242,0.00036754878,0.000011869684,0.0007152083,0.011272023,0.000040299343,0.9712529,0.0018172144,0.00039516282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014485616,0.00024924343,0.007296445,0.00022156624,0.00010603982,0.000059439128,0.00023666158,0.013218731,0.00077203737,0.06617144,0.9095502,0.00066964957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006097341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022596648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90773296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035535294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008042308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122150427","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhq034","title":"SUBSTITUTION BETWEEN OFFLINE AND ONLINE ADVERTISING MARKETS","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Substitution (logic); Library science; Advertising; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.0341221675444,"score_gpt":0.2273693306857161,"score_spread":0.1932471631413161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122150427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98337716,0.000107216256,0.00059616077,0.00019800982,0.0003874381,0.00005272091,0.00000514228,0.000016390533,0.0152597735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762565,0.00012044197,0.0009328182,0.00044107361,0.00083182316,3.519869e-7,0.000016444712,0.000012291965,0.000019092513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923027,0.0000115586345,0.0004798317,0.00009730945,0.000059064703,0.00012198891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992478,0.000041721458,0.00048297478,0.00008652724,0.00011848165,0.00002250665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004209972,0.0001044013,0.00023005826,0.0001573372,0.000111728266,0.00010374477,0.00010837198,0.00004710572,0.0003091963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018599967,0.0001071687,0.000075159274,0.00006502083,0.00006954852,0.0012578544,0.00005573198,0.00014543414,0.000010791653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046371671,0.00027639428,0.5491752,0.00018265683,0.00014498447,0.00004127764,0.00011532079,0.000035287405,0.0004094811,0.38535947,0.00015641165,0.06363979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012917572,0.000028695056,0.8790729,0.00018604464,0.00028892147,0.00006837395,0.00008937657,0.0005755256,0.00014523431,0.011974771,0.1059955,0.00028291476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104323415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001476138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3733847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028917133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001769555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4370213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124174232","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhs002","title":"THE FTC, IP, AND SSOS: GOVERNMENT HOLD-UP REPLACING PRIVATE COORDINATION","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Commercialization; Damages; Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Business; Competition (biology); Law and economics; Commission; Incentive; Patent infringement; Government (linguistics); Industrial organization; Economics; Public economics; Marketing; Law; Microeconomics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.018894525867776197,"score_gpt":0.1958500298451659,"score_spread":0.17695550397738968,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124174232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.909973,0.006706522,0.0016546521,0.0064734225,0.0025896966,0.00013029242,0.00006706531,0.0000109501525,0.07239437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99664825,0.0018773425,0.00021971841,0.0004227102,0.00042635447,0.0000037294606,0.0000015491572,0.000007182776,0.00039317997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990389,0.000013640415,0.00063475606,0.00009624629,0.000040465467,0.0001759957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894065,0.00010126315,0.0007391061,0.00010064082,0.000041540734,0.000076825825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084514735,0.00009360492,0.00023735991,0.000027768747,0.00036288647,0.00012461642,0.000109972694,0.000039028768,0.000041100044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053401815,0.00008228585,0.00009008061,0.00003584065,0.00013961185,0.0006535568,0.000057015306,0.0001322061,0.00004554933],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026774935,0.00002828719,0.011170626,0.0000055787655,0.00006605108,3.4767774e-7,0.000094042836,0.00005202772,0.00001239276,0.9878341,0.00021972132,0.0004900387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000669741,0.00006456176,0.029316323,0.000024391884,0.000014918165,0.000071751994,0.00015874037,0.00023010337,0.0001691205,0.078326955,0.89079535,0.00015803718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017326445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016725007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90950716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024582056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012042407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33555195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172051013","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhaa033","title":"An Analysis of the Altria-Juul Labs Deal: Antitrust and Population Health Implications","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Commission; Product (mathematics); Business; Competition (biology); Population; Market share; Position (finance); Marketing; Environmental health; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.026474015510776414,"score_gpt":0.2628459306845438,"score_spread":0.2363719151737674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172051013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904358,0.000053498356,0.0005210339,0.008086267,0.00008928543,0.00007838483,0.000011758836,0.00000867218,0.0007153235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960931,0.00007587576,0.00022069884,0.0033671185,0.00020954334,5.4627236e-7,0.00002445144,0.0000072109965,0.0000014507269],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926573,0.000024709829,0.00049018033,0.00008812464,0.000054886244,0.00007637052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883455,0.000033932123,0.0008729944,0.000118933785,0.00011416142,0.000025447487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035336392,0.000065444656,0.00026027212,0.0001343962,0.00014411085,0.00011705856,0.00014085774,0.000023895793,0.000084081745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012242608,0.000057349782,0.00011891387,0.00030602037,0.000031170097,0.0006334501,0.000034989516,0.00008673902,0.0000012295826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036899804,0.000042252916,0.7765576,0.00004262685,0.000119460514,1.9550473e-7,0.000062852596,0.0034530608,0.0001807139,0.21547472,0.00006918799,0.003960421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002756655,0.000015909714,0.97659326,0.000015970705,0.00042261006,0.0000024788983,0.000088521316,0.008952599,0.000011036885,0.0014094366,0.0121432,0.00006931656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056070084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010398909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2140653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028224127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028116114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23386562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413372890","doi":"10.1093/joclec/nhaf023","title":"Consumer Privacy and Anticompetitive Exclusion","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Competition Law & Economics","topic":"Legal and Constitutional Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Internet privacy; Consumer privacy; Law and economics; Information privacy; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.016622445873949336,"score_gpt":0.2186018105545711,"score_spread":0.20197936468062175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413372890","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69370174,0.00711393,0.0042720735,0.0063846027,0.0013797532,0.00013006869,0.00007995936,0.000015098936,0.28692275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445003,0.003032098,0.00082600204,0.0012436371,0.00011159409,0.0000019572062,0.0000028191505,0.000005258219,0.00032661215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901134,0.000012209306,0.0006839168,0.00015000768,0.000018776087,0.00012376628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922144,0.00008429668,0.0004523845,0.00009565626,0.000092103546,0.000054118027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029371472,0.00010613389,0.00039348484,0.00014965837,0.00019546454,0.00008264619,0.00012756612,0.000053248084,0.0001353532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003954017,0.0001136325,0.00010930849,0.00006889219,0.00024375923,0.00034746813,0.00009711057,0.00014457398,0.00005627272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030190278,0.000052158968,0.013089048,0.000016322127,0.00009384131,0.0000029145967,0.00006166352,0.000039169914,0.000013653667,0.98615026,0.00017048387,0.000280299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096974365,0.00005655612,0.026087226,0.000076183635,0.000017265858,0.000041664825,0.00006073234,0.00013692782,0.0001332162,0.33533758,0.63693917,0.00014370939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045711495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022111613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6508127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010444556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004688034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4633799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}