{"meta":{"query_hash":"c3a841edb613","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Computer Security"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c3a841edb613","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Computer+Security"},"results":[{"id":"W1627695629","doi":"10.3233/jcs-2010-0411","title":"Exploiting predictability in click-based graphical passwords","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"User Authentication and Security Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Password; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Predictability; Markov chain; Context (archaeology); Cardinality (data modeling); Field (mathematics); Data mining; Image (mathematics); Theoretical computer science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Computer security; Programming language; Mathematics","score_opus":0.029034769906996303,"score_gpt":0.2412165982529087,"score_spread":0.2121818283459124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1627695629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61116457,0.00006696725,0.386999,0.00047111372,0.0009154853,0.00011404506,0.0000010247505,0.000051675674,0.0002161011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823783,0.0000060552516,0.01702957,0.00035238234,0.00022172465,0.000003177879,4.289574e-7,0.0000070989986,0.0000012554301],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974521,0.0004251199,0.0010160158,0.0002712,0.00054171064,0.00029385625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983182,0.0001607613,0.00048283683,0.0005172777,0.00030012822,0.00022082134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018170812,0.0001627343,0.00038725976,0.00036782632,0.00005594519,0.00010912606,0.0012748898,0.00010841306,0.000019550242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057426256,0.00014290301,0.00023062972,0.0005650974,0.00006922786,0.00071487104,0.00016982692,0.0005171659,0.000007184258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019623019,0.0045854077,0.6598726,0.00031945528,0.00014282651,0.000540008,0.23689988,0.00004357213,0.00011749693,0.07691742,0.0021402445,0.018224869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027848964,0.0008345782,0.38355312,0.00033266444,0.000020815705,0.00024397289,0.00014791095,0.55317366,0.0009792462,0.05493959,0.0024762175,0.0005133196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003192066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038405593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5531301,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060007747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015053012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58274156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1749166516","doi":"10.3233/jcs-2008-16204","title":"Approximate autoregressive modeling for network attack detection","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Network Security and Intrusion Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency","keywords":"Autoregressive model; Computer science; STAR model; Autoregressive integrated moving average; Econometrics; Mathematics; Time series; Machine learning","score_opus":0.029567384811236566,"score_gpt":0.25406067920162606,"score_spread":0.2244932943903895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1749166516","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13351926,0.0003949589,0.86245257,0.00019828657,0.0031478188,0.0001640567,7.2701124e-7,0.00007511562,0.000047197318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89219505,0.0001379256,0.10417113,0.00025735283,0.0032125239,0.000005267887,6.0958075e-7,0.000012342856,0.0000077841605],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982227,0.00012469884,0.00064702646,0.0002566995,0.00039294496,0.00035593737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827844,0.00012159971,0.0005764062,0.00029868784,0.00056970277,0.00015516156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006966223,0.0001848046,0.00036112362,0.00014890393,0.00043838637,0.00011992869,0.0006940486,0.0001327531,0.000003763127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024536519,0.00016322907,0.00030153006,0.00029235362,0.000039460603,0.0010457176,0.00018096379,0.00041047184,0.00000385237],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000471521,0.00044492388,0.0001534691,0.00013791012,0.0002678849,0.00019731699,0.0069743237,0.8301393,0.00022945418,0.008797283,0.023716414,0.12847023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006664184,0.0005200444,0.00006707614,0.00006967192,0.000012076465,0.00096841156,0.0000037059935,0.97455865,0.00055909355,0.015967539,0.0064301006,0.00017721401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000038816124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062241024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7586758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007851477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008870973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6656288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1893507969","doi":"10.3233/jcs-140514","title":"<i>k</i> -jump: A strategy to design publicly-known algorithms for privacy preserving micro-data disclosure","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Generalization; Jump; Algorithm; Adversarial system; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14104985709097678,"score_gpt":0.33637696126704797,"score_spread":0.1953271041760712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1893507969","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007253505,0.0007068365,0.96185946,0.027380837,0.0017165806,0.0006463317,0.00008994157,0.00029124285,0.000055276105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044246417,0.00003211659,0.95413595,0.0005444875,0.0009637745,0.000013287329,0.000017247956,0.00003252412,0.000014183198],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599725,0.0003272581,0.0010616558,0.0008693602,0.00096682645,0.00077762816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98647535,0.00055672077,0.0007614912,0.010388854,0.0012125294,0.0006050331],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["open_science"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00437849,0.00038938987,0.000665561,0.00043708077,0.00015171793,0.0012481112,0.06881251,0.00022818291,0.000004515009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008567232,0.00033474414,0.00016789345,0.0009126676,0.00007914679,0.0045714616,0.10009786,0.0007115177,0.000014134606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006784779,0.00027261415,0.00025127298,0.000050127397,0.00012000417,0.00007820784,0.0005334354,0.00041001203,0.0001303167,0.0006348643,0.9557574,0.041693944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018198232,0.0017933996,0.00026976978,0.000183464,0.000038277885,0.0004835188,0.00004701684,0.64330244,0.0022229145,0.26455575,0.08470135,0.0005822358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029620713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010903274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.871056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018938951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007087946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921007510","doi":"10.3233/jcs-2008-16203","title":"Privacy policy enforcement in enterprises with identity management solutions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Access Control and Trust","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hewlett-Packard (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Privacy policy; Enforcement; Personally identifiable information; Privacy by Design; Leverage (statistics); Identity management; Information privacy; Privacy software; Computer security; Internet privacy; Business; Identity (music); Law enforcement; Computer science; Business process; Knowledge management; Access control; Work in process; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.021296075387698538,"score_gpt":0.3022430145189302,"score_spread":0.2809469391312317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921007510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8508348,0.00038269963,0.11673024,0.0038668578,0.00061903003,0.00034750882,0.00000240225,0.000031237425,0.027185215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967293,0.0004940574,0.0018082409,0.0002528118,0.00064969924,0.0000020471416,2.9971085e-7,0.0000036452432,0.00005987924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867046,0.0001152749,0.00032021286,0.000091253416,0.0005394195,0.0002633745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999388,0.000034154822,0.0002330492,0.00010356296,0.00012530199,0.000115934425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048347094,0.0000813346,0.00018682497,0.00024681134,0.00030412682,0.00007598049,0.00042353605,0.000031976575,0.000048510505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014502902,0.000065345215,0.00008297607,0.00033119982,0.00013064034,0.00088537537,0.00013045662,0.0001679371,0.000005678922],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033205046,0.0016845794,0.22374971,0.0000738284,0.00046165474,0.001558784,0.08612793,0.0014493704,0.0000028651307,0.656956,0.005641655,0.021961574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0074905185,0.0007485516,0.7094594,0.00041836695,0.000117502575,0.00025840852,0.0022447146,0.0016092793,0.000018181327,0.062255252,0.21474162,0.0006381639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014132774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00100313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59470075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018742734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020094772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26647004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921112198","doi":"10.3233/jcs-2012-0454","title":"Behavior-based access control for distributed healthcare systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Access Control and Trust","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Access control; Interoperability; Computer security; Role-based access control; Workflow; Database; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.02832447320771687,"score_gpt":0.3376463927683689,"score_spread":0.309321919560652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921112198","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32677853,0.001113987,0.6478884,0.016798979,0.004802657,0.0021814764,0.00018379973,0.000077211385,0.00017493493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723506,0.000010769171,0.0003196713,0.00054781244,0.0018150721,0.00005124163,0.000006147042,0.000008315331,0.000005921074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830633,0.00027730386,0.00052222883,0.0001217158,0.0004413316,0.0003310591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756384,0.000326507,0.0005840443,0.00012203354,0.0011130448,0.00029055696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007372347,0.00011668817,0.00039287197,0.00008508738,0.00033612218,0.0005928638,0.00064950547,0.00011707029,0.000039203038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005712262,0.000094306844,0.00021211246,0.00014574465,0.00008577582,0.0007840161,0.000027723241,0.00021616642,0.0000044846156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014196937,0.00341334,0.58240616,0.0010467074,0.00090634916,0.00026030935,0.009484542,0.005442084,0.00005749991,0.1474633,0.13406852,0.11403148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031224018,0.0037239527,0.43469504,0.00081635296,0.0008076218,0.00008245866,0.0020152174,0.19760571,0.00006877554,0.030492008,0.29659778,0.0018710697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020915202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020371159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6704565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011683355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032924794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5716999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1922844761","doi":"10.3233/jcs-140502","title":"Modular protections against non-control data attacks","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Security and Verification in Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Soundness; Memory safety; Separation logic; Compiler; Programming language; Pointer (user interface); Data type; Modular design; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02096124297612106,"score_gpt":0.2637338178031622,"score_spread":0.24277257482704112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1922844761","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029599037,0.00008206379,0.9657651,0.0018234227,0.0021242658,0.00016480917,0.000003966809,0.00007560319,0.00036170188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8917044,0.000014192857,0.10547545,0.0010263327,0.0017609046,0.0000018604325,0.0000026928724,0.000009859708,0.0000043317773],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977546,0.0002875782,0.0007397485,0.00040092063,0.0005205351,0.00029661783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969336,0.00023991699,0.00067684054,0.0014937975,0.00045464776,0.00020124344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002037348,0.00018734393,0.00037658203,0.00021622117,0.0002610116,0.0003755364,0.0034732267,0.00010332494,0.000004762317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000109059336,0.00017238736,0.00015235622,0.00039783254,0.000051472347,0.00133165,0.0006268226,0.00060610374,0.000024300256],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015715531,0.0030202032,0.0045982264,0.00046819288,0.0011480359,0.0002455293,0.012863333,0.08465616,0.0032266695,0.11230951,0.073794454,0.70351255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087389466,0.00017523296,0.0027759,0.0000690492,0.000013712716,0.00015665239,0.0000060509383,0.94925475,0.00016680994,0.0049625547,0.04135466,0.00019074156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000064330575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002299177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8645986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005044054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013449171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7029752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123193503","doi":"10.3233/jcs-2007-15401","title":"Parity-based inference control for multi-dimensional range sum queries","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Data Management and Algorithms","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Inference; Computer science; Range (aeronautics); Parity (physics); Statistical inference; Subtraction; Control (management); Theoretical computer science; Discrete mathematics; Mathematics; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.02731855282240219,"score_gpt":0.29240019902335673,"score_spread":0.26508164620095453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123193503","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009601152,0.0001492525,0.98742485,0.0009814992,0.001544,0.00020925247,0.00001633437,0.000046537087,0.000027118516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51420933,0.00000422165,0.4837544,0.001492401,0.000512486,0.000002150451,0.0000046378345,0.000007250679,0.0000130940125],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983058,0.000071631854,0.0005858949,0.00022931489,0.00045534607,0.00035203865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981194,0.0004732981,0.00043615626,0.0003234708,0.00047454174,0.0001731114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018777362,0.00017796269,0.00035011812,0.00022449964,0.00013828163,0.00025870124,0.0010743067,0.000065047796,0.0000064579704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061440995,0.00014934661,0.00021096412,0.00020146575,0.00006679189,0.0010756251,0.00018802675,0.0002452751,0.000005531685],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021461418,0.0066186553,0.054942377,0.00086940767,0.0013275191,0.0018108458,0.0038904436,0.0065300283,0.00048861565,0.41314918,0.09223101,0.41599578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067547965,0.0006628313,0.018344728,0.00009597619,0.000040042654,0.00003700976,0.000007964452,0.9297135,0.00048284355,0.0059926165,0.03750584,0.000361845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000086440305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021291924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9231835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038703183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110042136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6090178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124689666","doi":"10.3233/jcs-2010-0412","title":"Leveraging personal devices for stronger password authentication from untrusted computers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"User Authentication and Security Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Password; Computer science; Computer security; Authentication (law); Email authentication; One-time password; Phishing; Usability; Chip Authentication Program; Database transaction; Personally identifiable information; Mobile device; Multi-factor authentication; The Internet; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Authentication protocol; Database; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.040194010136475486,"score_gpt":0.2474682426283154,"score_spread":0.2072742324918399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124689666","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32906997,0.0001459622,0.66775805,0.0006429596,0.0020949803,0.00017850388,0.0000064899787,0.000054681084,0.00004841042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91562206,0.0000057662864,0.083287865,0.0004351458,0.0006162642,0.000004494543,0.000006135541,0.00001247434,0.000009775073],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979065,0.00018626626,0.00078800396,0.00033151667,0.0004846781,0.00030302408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978413,0.00024152985,0.0007711826,0.0003822926,0.00054732227,0.0002163489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006609577,0.00021364947,0.0003993903,0.00023486213,0.00014254132,0.00028418418,0.0012921432,0.00009417023,0.000031314044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017442602,0.00019263115,0.0002823819,0.00022570821,0.00004664081,0.000931714,0.0001713953,0.00024383893,0.000015561016],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002622756,0.0017502229,0.021999873,0.0002700518,0.0013513534,0.00007829529,0.85594004,0.000022184855,0.0006118464,0.038593482,0.016793463,0.06232692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018262588,0.00040209913,0.07213447,0.00023210557,0.00010302144,0.00011119298,0.0004738914,0.8932304,0.0006805236,0.018471973,0.011840988,0.00049310515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040618183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012366651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8932082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007548348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117382755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78552705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605875060","doi":"10.3233/jcs-16857","title":"Diet-ESP: IP layer security for IoT","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"IoT and Edge/Fog Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ericsson (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Byte; Overhead (engineering); Computer network; Network packet; Payload (computing); Header; Internet of Things; Embedded system; Computer hardware; Operating system","score_opus":0.030621225521485964,"score_gpt":0.2975834882665042,"score_spread":0.2669622627450183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605875060","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23200151,0.00035670988,0.73078966,0.004000373,0.031636067,0.0002390374,0.0000013697057,0.00008213714,0.0008931188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8978367,0.000018118288,0.08724067,0.0006146883,0.014229915,0.0000024803626,6.7759066e-7,0.000020732497,0.000036023415],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977367,0.00010429716,0.00072891195,0.00036499847,0.0005135667,0.00055150926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966057,0.00025262218,0.0011827665,0.001022244,0.0006530514,0.0002836386],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014873982,0.00027518565,0.0005610958,0.00017079742,0.00079790666,0.001109333,0.0033246595,0.00014638198,0.0000029099408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012042268,0.0002395311,0.0004716006,0.00010480465,0.00008852493,0.001023909,0.0009982197,0.00054112717,0.0000156337],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062489155,0.0015391392,0.009091555,0.0005317759,0.00073778135,0.00071321084,0.019925624,0.00026998905,0.00031932318,0.056108866,0.68974316,0.2203947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040101903,0.0022279553,0.02296403,0.00039473377,0.00007589944,0.0006002658,0.00001594592,0.41636842,0.002561653,0.20792574,0.34182587,0.0010292977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014133709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035689675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6658352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007506991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021651282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2608745566","doi":"10.3233/jcs-16847","title":"On the security and usability of dynamic cognitive game CAPTCHAs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"User Authentication and Security Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Computer science; CAPTCHA; Human–computer interaction; Computer security","score_opus":0.016622711525566058,"score_gpt":0.2756021559657522,"score_spread":0.25897944444018617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2608745566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95045036,0.00015539257,0.044763196,0.0033873266,0.0007722949,0.00020178508,0.000009300864,0.000014693927,0.00024564358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992391,0.00003573662,0.00033867048,0.0002705852,0.00010238323,0.0000015830443,3.262311e-7,0.000005652155,0.000005974321],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980772,0.0003289338,0.0006188686,0.00025062443,0.00053035235,0.00019399123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967116,0.0006150435,0.0011458478,0.00085792993,0.0005238551,0.00014568461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016281833,0.00016831649,0.0004111284,0.000097125325,0.00025667774,0.00037783783,0.001580601,0.0000793369,0.000010778573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027794664,0.00011401096,0.00018083528,0.00008418972,0.00033006896,0.00059074105,0.00042739668,0.00041809847,0.000006256261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041049925,0.0032504904,0.018676693,0.0006542217,0.0009573914,0.0001924825,0.50560737,0.000010759414,0.00035208874,0.41624567,0.0033443964,0.05029795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024880357,0.0011898287,0.1551119,0.00067606417,0.00007693372,0.0004403485,0.00043874685,0.46514016,0.00096690445,0.37198308,0.001000428,0.00048754754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003162808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030709994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5051686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003567359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009107324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4649232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789589593","doi":"10.3233/jcs-171106","title":"Surviving unpatchable vulnerabilities through heterogeneous network hardening options","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Information and Cyber Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Army Research Office; Office of Naval Research; Concordia University","keywords":"Computer science; Hardening (computing); Computer security; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.015468499814574104,"score_gpt":0.2501281810025684,"score_spread":0.2346596811879943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789589593","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07745687,0.00035157174,0.91523147,0.0007232469,0.003959325,0.000090079986,0.0000018054042,0.00009876168,0.0020868806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8634542,0.000044470486,0.13288198,0.0011493973,0.0024270632,0.0000015186789,9.3083247e-7,0.000009291775,0.00003114094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977775,0.00025814556,0.00079599314,0.00019929306,0.000528311,0.00044071826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787956,0.00016085758,0.00054433505,0.00047219236,0.0007937691,0.00014930013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012302498,0.00019871922,0.00036084803,0.00010527742,0.00044526553,0.00048072677,0.0011378669,0.00009271365,0.000071984556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030316156,0.00017823378,0.0002312255,0.00039108878,0.00011611166,0.002114823,0.00042580641,0.0004133049,0.000050333834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012299108,0.0007094025,0.0035162324,0.00019666001,0.00060246774,0.00023855842,0.1326632,0.044562586,0.000055361204,0.69512415,0.091314085,0.030894274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001598386,0.0015210635,0.002034702,0.00034690744,0.000042628377,0.0024010018,0.00026095254,0.6368886,0.001993962,0.16479468,0.18718117,0.00093588885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027993465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036482776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78599733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007975971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014364181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72681624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789789243","doi":"10.3233/jcs-171103","title":"HardIDX: Practical and secure index with SGX in a malicious environment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Cryptography and Data Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Encryption; Memory footprint; Software; Code (set theory); Index (typography); Information leakage; Computer security; Operating system; Embedded system; World Wide Web; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.007252090349492954,"score_gpt":0.2338831207959884,"score_spread":0.22663103044649544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789789243","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33603224,0.0001796386,0.6617858,0.0015644734,0.00023657588,0.000095220355,0.0000032810658,0.00001668468,0.00008606455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87421507,0.00007352588,0.12485682,0.00046253222,0.0003836395,0.0000011371521,5.5393247e-7,0.000006239519,4.9772876e-7],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983445,0.00016202818,0.000419371,0.00030090744,0.00048624934,0.00028697218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988291,0.0001447162,0.00030820226,0.00039579344,0.000106847074,0.00021531408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067831477,0.00018215805,0.0003269915,0.00024465285,0.00007929509,0.00015457635,0.0005110048,0.0000943591,0.000015450702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016292946,0.00014030369,0.000073867115,0.00029535376,0.0002018475,0.0010792637,0.0003859271,0.0005332416,0.0000060231773],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002159671,0.00558951,0.2717707,0.0003040511,0.00081117393,0.00762153,0.055645674,0.0003208167,0.00023486654,0.54127276,0.020356938,0.09391235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010649036,0.008987917,0.46246052,0.0006107428,0.00011342463,0.013061999,0.00028511637,0.1775575,0.0008413464,0.19337767,0.13031714,0.0017375979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017538365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005659469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5381828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003794712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011271554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5721418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903853604","doi":"10.3233/jcs-181137","title":"Learning probabilistic dependencies among events for proactive security auditing in clouds","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Network Security and Intrusion Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ericsson (Canada); Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Audit; Computer science; Probabilistic logic; Computer security; Artificial intelligence; Business; Accounting","score_opus":0.012271776939325432,"score_gpt":0.24709455094213426,"score_spread":0.23482277400280882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903853604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70129144,0.00004919522,0.29653493,0.00016887215,0.0014790128,0.00030061734,9.37823e-7,0.0000454754,0.0001295434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98402965,0.000016913382,0.014070072,0.00009063351,0.0017614368,0.0000104478095,7.53866e-7,0.00001206472,0.0000080191285],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758196,0.00035977043,0.000771056,0.0003562705,0.0005003269,0.00043063422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769056,0.00033990823,0.00080952205,0.00024629405,0.00076512445,0.00014859736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019511775,0.00021446426,0.00041221982,0.0002780128,0.000285536,0.00017051896,0.00084669166,0.0001504504,0.00001064713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002637172,0.0001986288,0.0002062601,0.0005356341,0.00010991967,0.0013821122,0.00033601656,0.0007982182,0.0000049295736],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002779487,0.0058084223,0.11178026,0.0015526391,0.0013055617,0.000564697,0.2631605,0.01974158,0.00096571416,0.1288013,0.01246356,0.45107627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016797334,0.0029826758,0.02254156,0.000395218,0.000026980897,0.00025547645,0.00015013745,0.8104017,0.0019070368,0.15629709,0.0029292547,0.00043313694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023194683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014073814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79066014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018996895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014777086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80998474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952391640","doi":"10.3233/jcs-191306","title":"Mitigating the insider threat of remote administrators in clouds through maintenance task assignments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Cloud Data Security Solutions","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Computer security; Cloud computing; Credential; Insider; Task (project management); Computer science; Downtime; Privilege (computing); Insider threat; Internet privacy; Engineering","score_opus":0.0168734904852838,"score_gpt":0.26860243249639526,"score_spread":0.25172894201111146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952391640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77672327,0.00028853858,0.21854313,0.002321132,0.0014224413,0.00023264052,0.000014183949,0.00001932962,0.00043532738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92417026,0.000043796255,0.07497226,0.0006079888,0.000188141,5.6515756e-7,0.0000012826931,0.000009534135,0.0000061860896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973402,0.00027454176,0.0010154562,0.00029518348,0.00070376525,0.0003708373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975225,0.00035034993,0.00090699724,0.00084973406,0.00027175233,0.00009871539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010996525,0.00020670862,0.0004727384,0.000101997204,0.000079387224,0.00012172859,0.0018346153,0.00010049648,0.00001213384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008169035,0.00015202872,0.00021179853,0.000607554,0.00012240626,0.00094915455,0.0006207247,0.0006905892,0.000013655313],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041080685,0.0039154603,0.14595932,0.00095023494,0.0012448443,0.0016273558,0.13828169,0.0059629134,0.00504982,0.57126397,0.058330566,0.06700301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00883139,0.0028469078,0.14232077,0.0034374176,0.000107076696,0.002821955,0.0010308375,0.4486163,0.0076118233,0.33916906,0.041564085,0.0016423733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010442432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006330363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4426534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013030831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025711948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6199551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975826887","doi":"10.3233/jcs-191292","title":"Decoupling coding habits from functionality for effective binary authorship attribution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Advanced Malware Detection Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Binary number; Code refactoring; Source code; Coding (social sciences); Binary code; Compiler; Reverse engineering; Programming language; Software","score_opus":0.01485298257875823,"score_gpt":0.2771072211113607,"score_spread":0.2622542385326025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975826887","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3188087,0.00010801095,0.67845124,0.00022197001,0.0019762802,0.0003028441,0.000008074785,0.00011413916,0.000008711694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8159293,0.0000071648374,0.18328317,0.00015898312,0.0005954537,0.00000991009,0.0000031548893,0.000009115231,0.0000037783323],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842495,0.00014376607,0.00051036937,0.00032005936,0.00036353365,0.00023733651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748063,0.0007894546,0.0006094967,0.00031764415,0.00068420876,0.00011855226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011478437,0.00017353983,0.00036195543,0.00018663719,0.00012923608,0.00011942973,0.0005767898,0.00013356665,0.000009004241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066323126,0.00016443129,0.00025425828,0.00027101897,0.000023939328,0.0012273238,0.00021281524,0.00042490574,0.000010505731],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022948037,0.0017061539,0.07615655,0.0007574608,0.0011591647,0.00016328118,0.0054229833,0.021347297,0.031958688,0.21262117,0.012668343,0.6337441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026161694,0.0025932447,0.13628514,0.00042672467,0.000049428803,0.00021835823,0.000014358129,0.44023907,0.063448556,0.33693257,0.016510466,0.00066590996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000056683684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013436384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6330782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021943272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007028939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67053133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989588798","doi":"10.3233/jcs-191346","title":"Multilayer ransomware detection using grouped registry key operations, file entropy and file signature monitoring","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Advanced Malware Detection Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Ransomware; Computer science; Encryption; Signature (topology); Data mining; Entropy (arrow of time); Key (lock); Computer security; Malware; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007981079758762184,"score_gpt":0.2453106957023075,"score_spread":0.23732961594354532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989588798","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24444754,0.00019480039,0.7539642,0.000053937365,0.0010398694,0.00015353832,0.000027674105,0.000110145476,0.0000082746365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6792296,0.000030543124,0.32018128,0.00005478362,0.00046654136,0.0000032978287,0.0000023819373,0.000011512485,0.000020069836],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986285,0.00011851725,0.00042704988,0.00028159597,0.00033823703,0.00020612108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986876,0.0001461611,0.00032122675,0.00035359507,0.0003737475,0.00011766318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022917699,0.00018394868,0.00028611094,0.00019517382,0.00015398274,0.0002479808,0.0004607265,0.0001489967,0.00012151639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004811216,0.00017257355,0.00011260527,0.00024765462,0.000024573996,0.0016761733,0.00020484011,0.0005974017,0.0000042826723],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000801237,0.0013698756,0.008026424,0.0010371456,0.00076203304,0.0009627287,0.018177161,0.07966322,0.50458735,0.0023838708,0.025131218,0.35709774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014513978,0.0006562238,0.006849092,0.0005062291,0.00002534627,0.0014233838,0.00008905522,0.8161023,0.15799135,0.0020248785,0.012285773,0.00059494463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016798473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000034959849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7364391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009603784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053586096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7037345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089926615","doi":"10.3233/jcs-191416","title":"EQRC: A secure QR code-based E-coupon framework supporting online and offline transactions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"QR Code Applications and Technologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Coupon; Computer security; Information leakage; Code (set theory); Cryptography; Security analysis; Computer engineering","score_opus":0.01849363933795797,"score_gpt":0.26847070344670115,"score_spread":0.24997706410874318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089926615","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11232819,0.00026894425,0.86360204,0.023405956,0.00013923734,0.000091924754,0.000014143822,0.00013904723,0.0000105218705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6760487,0.00004042449,0.32241923,0.0013061018,0.00017584971,0.0000014230886,0.0000011379443,0.000006406098,7.0930895e-7],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986484,0.00004351325,0.0005529986,0.0002546345,0.0002867626,0.00021365876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986902,0.00017242004,0.00041829006,0.00030473722,0.00023572962,0.00017865819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026010463,0.00015844396,0.00031760545,0.00012293883,0.000120871686,0.00016048393,0.00080891047,0.00013254282,0.000013559282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042711006,0.00013730013,0.00013394875,0.0004921079,0.000060686845,0.00037282982,0.00010302005,0.0006959995,0.0000025335657],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024603927,0.0029173747,0.0039462983,0.00061071495,0.0005514679,0.0007106743,0.014448983,0.013307249,0.0033114387,0.16577639,0.008541999,0.78563136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078950136,0.0006858556,0.0016353854,0.00010436915,0.000036846206,0.00018636906,0.00007433608,0.9544857,0.0017862075,0.024136432,0.0158056,0.0002733733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000030812232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005514631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9411785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022707418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011300489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55989367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210598630","doi":"10.3233/jcs-210094","title":"Adversarial examples for network intrusion detection systems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computer Security","topic":"Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Adversarial system; Exploit; Adversary; Intrusion detection system; Artificial intelligence; Robustness (evolution); Machine learning; Pattern recognition (psychology); Computer security","score_opus":0.01233739287635993,"score_gpt":0.2411539419570545,"score_spread":0.22881654908069457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210598630","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022349417,0.00024777715,0.96214765,0.00023398601,0.014692374,0.00022941946,0.0000021204783,0.00006183285,0.00003544266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90953356,0.000005823066,0.0857072,0.00014325952,0.0045755366,0.000010466427,0.0000015984484,0.000013948286,0.0000085918255],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774873,0.0005140973,0.0005992439,0.00024158313,0.00059710286,0.00029921654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998126,0.00043206886,0.0008404016,0.00029150138,0.00020880064,0.00010124431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020941983,0.00015173922,0.0003444474,0.00017429063,0.0006280661,0.00018650104,0.001174669,0.000055729983,0.000010717165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006206436,0.00014772356,0.00021065277,0.00037987853,0.000021610604,0.0005858798,0.00086912443,0.0006448463,9.965123e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017345336,0.00007241102,0.00018848071,0.000030507597,0.000066155626,0.0000359025,0.001201119,0.9434956,0.00006317584,0.017624166,0.003543728,0.03350531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011577369,0.00079432345,0.00027278,0.00002408058,0.000021537659,0.00041033185,0.000048431546,0.91330665,0.000028635513,0.00844539,0.07531778,0.00017230559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025025787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003335576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88718414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021555263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012137052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6023992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}