{"meta":{"query_hash":"744c65b53d86","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/744c65b53d86","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Computing+in+Higher+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W1974297166","doi":"10.1007/s12528-013-9069-3","title":"Student behavioural intentions to use desktop video conferencing in a distance course: integration of autonomy to the UTAUT model","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Expectancy theory; Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology; Autonomy; Psychology; Social influence; Distance education; Videoconferencing; Educational technology; Sample (material); Higher education; Computer-mediated communication; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Multimedia; Mathematics education; The Internet; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1897986364600633,"score_gpt":0.4353844249770156,"score_spread":0.2455857885169523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974297166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990055,0.0000063664024,0.00033702236,0.000030153757,0.0000014893385,0.000007439537,0.000013195216,0.0000028950683,0.00059594057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996227,0.000007336247,0.00014254377,0.0000056101744,7.9140165e-7,0.0000076259876,0.000018266128,0.0000010486149,0.00019409279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986771,0.00067145255,0.00010397122,0.00013169793,0.00025094594,0.00016486799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97879076,0.014400399,0.0031810303,0.0009319995,0.0015915842,0.0011041716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003148997,0.00023264313,0.00028127225,0.00055829895,0.00032834252,0.0018893974,0.00041668036,0.000801846,0.0027088546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015571626,0.00026144495,0.00060222985,0.00046460525,0.000612759,0.0007594925,0.0007266534,0.0013223843,0.00045940068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019873562,0.0007158448,0.9871399,0.000019026336,0.00006686842,0.000041641124,0.0031798761,0.00075323746,0.00047414165,0.00063163135,0.00007013526,0.0067090522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020158479,0.0007015411,0.9769546,0.000026876445,0.00010287821,0.00009213144,0.0050888457,0.015027028,0.00081988703,0.00087410456,0.00026746286,0.00002450096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047556646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047413683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047556646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005742632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078421785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016653717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977055232","doi":"10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3","title":"A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":838,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Distance education; Meta-analysis; Higher education; Mathematics education; Content analysis; Educational technology; Computer science; Educational research; Blended learning; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06965557126562434,"score_gpt":0.36236870099192636,"score_spread":0.29271312972630203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977055232","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05367741,0.93809325,0.004361995,0.00059517584,0.0009266499,0.00076648575,0.00088209566,0.00008648928,0.0006104506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.806026,0.17963034,0.007780307,0.0018746911,0.00055788056,0.0020209872,0.0010553146,0.00016206538,0.0008924369],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9368599,0.037650295,0.014382173,0.0054849545,0.0047205454,0.00090213894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.883621,0.0932026,0.009841431,0.0068237763,0.00524111,0.0012701213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041604884,0.0032955941,0.015982984,0.007681353,0.001399044,0.005645441,0.0031011603,0.0037477592,0.0030381472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1121258,0.002004244,0.058016047,0.007968389,0.0017986532,0.002999973,0.0034849094,0.0030026666,0.00036424317],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002300395,0.000022674201,0.0061155283,0.036208905,0.95202315,0.000059445993,0.00017648155,0.00012091771,0.00017857242,0.000088059314,0.00015417235,0.0025516918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000809233,0.00027303398,0.004311316,0.0043960474,0.98902506,0.0000661239,0.00010775397,0.000102388534,0.000116405645,0.00017874374,0.00059299485,0.000020895975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009257135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016784113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041604884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037898584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040911147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22003031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977130472","doi":"10.1007/s12528-014-9084-z","title":"An exploration of bias in meta-analysis: the case of technology integration research in higher education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Higher education; Publication bias; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Order (exchange); Mathematics education; Computer science; Epistemology; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.6321440034384781,"score_gpt":0.5481170955846667,"score_spread":0.0840269078538114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977130472","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064405836,0.3394746,0.55269,0.020498373,0.0046935407,0.009153513,0.0017120001,0.0012944287,0.0060777864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7026043,0.020178912,0.2547481,0.011355338,0.0010578142,0.007820704,0.00059029966,0.00050579925,0.0011386314],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.1855124,0.7172951,0.053729203,0.020722857,0.021320065,0.001420417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.05295776,0.900802,0.015481109,0.02571527,0.004460156,0.00058374356],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6189799,0.004933503,0.018387083,0.011733177,0.0033020724,0.011962941,0.008814383,0.011726097,0.0039472813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.789791,0.0028424014,0.03558672,0.012679135,0.0076535265,0.012621329,0.008304642,0.007620146,0.00033064507],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055878586,0.00018793446,0.06607433,0.103445515,0.6917569,0.0020363405,0.0074859257,0.0059635215,0.001061604,0.031580426,0.003804853,0.08101479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040033017,0.0026022273,0.02198541,0.0503034,0.6782276,0.0037364766,0.004947705,0.03541248,0.003510085,0.16998456,0.024400705,0.00088602246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056792656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01057393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38102013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005939918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009435857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46986568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998215200","doi":"10.1007/s12528-010-9041-4","title":"A multi-year investigation of the relationship between pedagogy, computer use and course effectiveness in postsecondary education","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Predictive power; Psychology; Sample (material); Mathematics education; Regression analysis; Computer literacy; Higher education; Perception; Technology integration; Educational technology; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.1137058181416069,"score_gpt":0.39420367697208375,"score_spread":0.28049785883047684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998215200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994842,0.000034855304,0.000035724333,0.000043451786,0.0000068698278,0.000019908992,0.000077938465,0.000004893415,0.00029220528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821705,0.00004071493,0.00008344901,0.000049614257,0.000009739393,0.000055801167,0.00017649417,0.0000025815068,0.0013645177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985808,0.00033549516,0.000117033844,0.00016629088,0.00033826614,0.00046209162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869185,0.002947036,0.002538548,0.0007321446,0.0023238456,0.0045399824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004063361,0.00036965217,0.0006496787,0.0017175651,0.002587369,0.0018496007,0.0007416865,0.00093643897,0.002635068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008159505,0.0005140023,0.00064318,0.0010448283,0.00062673213,0.0015963089,0.0019409069,0.0019957589,0.000924867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013305173,0.0120573575,0.9563195,0.000040394676,0.00009397535,0.0002129916,0.0050600655,0.0001514554,0.0013807432,0.00013179975,0.00066077156,0.022560358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028322671,0.004160538,0.9902683,0.000012245246,0.000036843256,0.000048284553,0.003592314,0.00023174839,0.00068997627,0.00004273558,0.0008705924,0.000018103772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018363087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03548802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99593663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014878758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023350115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036512434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069214455","doi":"10.1007/s12528-011-9043-x","title":"Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":401,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Distance education; Instructional design; Educational technology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Online learning; Online course; Higher education; Learning theory; Collaborative learning; Psychology; Multimedia; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.06737516137194509,"score_gpt":0.42058135754903236,"score_spread":0.35320619617708726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069214455","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31632236,0.5620258,0.022979524,0.05269265,0.0021887443,0.0013351612,0.00031166515,0.00007496731,0.04206916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8087853,0.16402347,0.021186829,0.0041368036,0.00047177932,0.0005984768,0.00014814392,0.000023587141,0.0006256603],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93976235,0.034367815,0.0087753665,0.0040003075,0.012057243,0.0010368169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36107787,0.6041434,0.01377894,0.006017323,0.013078586,0.0019039786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060122963,0.0008524391,0.002095467,0.009134386,0.0024317673,0.008340616,0.0043914337,0.0055704135,0.004980195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20870507,0.0010648211,0.0017251028,0.007010624,0.010183154,0.011382069,0.0048939693,0.005474561,0.00043709582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013390746,0.0048501976,0.10762025,0.05673416,0.0035571847,0.00062148814,0.030126898,0.0011353286,0.0005507813,0.033691145,0.003021202,0.7567523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002515207,0.0060530333,0.22045992,0.41433263,0.013422491,0.0030322007,0.11491915,0.006915055,0.005474962,0.13094236,0.081280164,0.0006528528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012276293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019821363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060122963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006811882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014497099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31796443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085592690","doi":"10.1007/s12528-009-9014-7","title":"Role of instructional technology in the transformation of higher education","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Educational technology; Constructivist teaching methods; Technology integration; Instructional design; Convergence (economics); Collaborative learning; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Mathematics education; Teaching and learning center; Teaching method; Pedagogy; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014578698736714194,"score_gpt":0.3404196179678708,"score_spread":0.3258409192311566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085592690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5585116,0.0034039805,0.03608529,0.02265615,0.0005536778,0.00012071099,0.000106047926,0.00039339368,0.37816912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875969,0.0004940754,0.0052871145,0.00032100128,0.000056534544,0.000026823025,0.000013945601,0.00003896301,0.006164632],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969861,0.0019664636,0.000099121986,0.00016285416,0.0005200217,0.00026554236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909434,0.00670171,0.0004649002,0.00046665565,0.00069379405,0.000729491],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033801459,0.00021050639,0.00015531256,0.0010478981,0.0013068881,0.008585806,0.00054701214,0.001053377,0.010645668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012597759,0.00017098931,0.00021675971,0.00062575267,0.0026182113,0.0044244966,0.0026378867,0.0017717521,0.0010458626],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003037642,0.0014623621,0.02333958,0.0003329006,0.000043426728,0.00043908492,0.020963617,0.0019667652,0.005054709,0.34826946,0.0054901345,0.59233415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030471277,0.0016561481,0.113438204,0.0016786589,0.00016038517,0.001512246,0.08175187,0.016215911,0.03075478,0.34929997,0.4030759,0.00015113608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009380052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093111634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010645668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018118039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028954053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0356133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122842921","doi":"10.1007/bf02940853","title":"Agent toolkit satisfaction and use in higher education","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Adaptation (eye); Computer science; User satisfaction; Higher education; Point (geometry); Knowledge management; Multimedia; Human–computer interaction; Psychology","score_opus":0.05888305272924555,"score_gpt":0.30629652423615095,"score_spread":0.2474134715069054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122842921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854214,0.00025816768,0.0017456184,0.00065388315,0.000013065166,0.000025847006,0.000066068766,0.000038462596,0.011777599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889565,0.000024226581,0.00021959642,0.000017555896,0.0000024144688,0.000008856777,0.000025650184,0.000009956024,0.00079605856],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895983,0.006678657,0.00068266643,0.00041446544,0.0017936481,0.0008322343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89390963,0.06765351,0.013092325,0.0037925772,0.011955575,0.009596429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010447413,0.00018740978,0.00050493213,0.0020522499,0.0019712793,0.006665641,0.0010522427,0.0016415658,0.009363552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08893582,0.0003462041,0.00044491334,0.0022751486,0.0016722797,0.0032463432,0.0027944883,0.0020434714,0.0010697712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002738384,0.0025982957,0.8367988,0.0001509437,0.00022702246,0.0004395493,0.032033674,0.004045873,0.0012587341,0.019129634,0.002397011,0.09818225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019087695,0.0012902492,0.87294984,0.0001232514,0.00019766291,0.00071431225,0.052822214,0.032010645,0.001993545,0.028757768,0.008797296,0.0001522544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009426408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073452005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010447413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026215992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025974459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055251837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133421346","doi":"10.1007/s12528-009-9021-8","title":"Technology’s effect on achievement in higher education: a Stage I meta-analysis of classroom applications","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Presentational and representational acting; Meta-analysis; Psychology; Higher education; Mathematics education; Sample size determination; Cognition; Empirical research; Educational technology; Academic achievement; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05403410038074671,"score_gpt":0.3935231646006804,"score_spread":0.3394890642199337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133421346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.592626,0.39263588,0.008385843,0.0007050121,0.0012761841,0.0008722279,0.0018658411,0.00025049088,0.0013826181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785308,0.015892824,0.0031316546,0.0003316906,0.00016587558,0.0004960026,0.0004803675,0.00010424176,0.0008664197],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.96486115,0.022664184,0.004913164,0.004199275,0.002571974,0.00079017435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9307365,0.05256511,0.006916846,0.004839451,0.0034789327,0.0014631634],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023721281,0.0028617694,0.009128255,0.0034427943,0.001419155,0.0036503302,0.002329883,0.0031051536,0.003243675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052489463,0.0020016828,0.047071844,0.004387883,0.0016748036,0.001819045,0.0026178963,0.0028456186,0.0003731615],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01354191,0.00012760486,0.021215145,0.009457943,0.9502707,0.000106449916,0.0004059515,0.00019081842,0.0007573721,0.00006552201,0.00017607104,0.00368449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002473235,0.0020257009,0.020388672,0.0006966904,0.9729748,0.00007474013,0.00015231986,0.00017374335,0.00039890167,0.00011114697,0.00050166354,0.000028465902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008709133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012525897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014759838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002176459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12545162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2560046333","doi":"10.1007/s12528-016-9128-7","title":"MOOC—making and open educational practices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Online Learning and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Openness to experience; Open educational resources; Open education; Perspective (graphical); Higher education; Pedagogy; Educational technology; Sociology; Best practice; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05997376297766913,"score_gpt":0.41096399216638063,"score_spread":0.3509902291887115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2560046333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5315671,0.0023300087,0.097754784,0.04717596,0.0013054586,0.000284922,0.0001416512,0.0006776212,0.3187625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738045,0.0004279128,0.010752173,0.0007007841,0.00018661014,0.000050273837,0.000049656246,0.00013984973,0.01388813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441826,0.0023683752,0.00023661627,0.0005950132,0.0018377911,0.0005439971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98517436,0.005428852,0.0014416683,0.0031854643,0.0024494433,0.0023201127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057400106,0.00028459687,0.00019206408,0.0017543221,0.0033328845,0.010687297,0.0011951124,0.0018694825,0.0046257884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02305586,0.00032127326,0.00026042544,0.0010014209,0.0055748816,0.011513537,0.004553024,0.0021689455,0.0009211725],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001078293,0.00032567265,0.02055993,0.00014952879,0.00003766957,0.00020716545,0.046644762,0.00071451196,0.0047451253,0.5734374,0.008653733,0.34441662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043050597,0.00020119255,0.01963958,0.0007188737,0.00004901047,0.00022600635,0.047731224,0.0036823726,0.0055785896,0.56226814,0.35977203,0.00008994037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031716304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004126282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010687297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020725923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040200395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030356467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2735696209","doi":"10.1007/s12528-017-9158-9","title":"The role of behavioral expectation in technology acceptance: a CEGEP case study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Technology acceptance model; Technology integration; Educational technology; Psychology; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; Computer science; Economics; Human–computer interaction; Usability; Economic growth","score_opus":0.11869542950492692,"score_gpt":0.47218408708536636,"score_spread":0.35348865758043946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2735696209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972441,0.000019125711,0.0005332095,0.00019216239,0.0000028768966,0.000049648836,0.000030632367,0.0000050818876,0.0019231328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985654,0.00003812926,0.0006102567,0.000045771343,0.000002090462,0.000050573653,0.000020683992,0.0000053983,0.0006617534],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977563,0.0012237356,0.0000850394,0.00014055059,0.00038367364,0.00041062897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98077285,0.014977791,0.0006789019,0.00087917026,0.0015885767,0.0011027318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034400388,0.0004095981,0.0004537111,0.0011813197,0.0036875322,0.0023755357,0.0010362535,0.002431439,0.0027800312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019053653,0.00028560532,0.00036991743,0.001191436,0.0016696159,0.0020746163,0.0020534182,0.0020542538,0.00036976335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015411587,0.016928755,0.5105387,0.0004972875,0.00010820437,0.040849373,0.30229113,0.003093993,0.004976359,0.014931979,0.0028133488,0.101429656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003327854,0.0047358167,0.3313816,0.00047529946,0.00019013084,0.02498502,0.5746947,0.028506447,0.009276234,0.0074667744,0.017687337,0.00026786956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012282163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012991849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98771787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015553611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023012103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024421334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897840590","doi":"10.1007/s12528-018-9197-x","title":"A comparison of lecture-based, active, and flipped classroom teaching approaches in higher education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Durham College; University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Active learning (machine learning); Flipped classroom; Mathematics education; Flexibility (engineering); CLARITY; Teaching method; Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive flexibility; Cooperative learning; Higher education; Blended learning; Educational technology; Community of inquiry; Pedagogy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.17482877533067356,"score_gpt":0.45732763804941895,"score_spread":0.28249886271874536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897840590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99141556,0.0007225213,0.004383607,0.00013852988,0.00007338892,0.00019772461,0.00004881544,0.000051296007,0.0029684752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878978,0.0006159122,0.008565799,0.0000888154,0.000026534974,0.00014693684,0.000057560446,0.000017561626,0.0025830937],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982816,0.00076388085,0.00009177735,0.00021556937,0.0005066617,0.00014050823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948999,0.003157982,0.00027909625,0.00030436701,0.00065918436,0.00069950125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002125924,0.0003066831,0.0004762995,0.0006002203,0.0005114041,0.0009659229,0.001056637,0.000580897,0.003969294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067870454,0.00016241476,0.00042321288,0.0003947579,0.00045336786,0.0010224262,0.0010615987,0.0006730648,0.0004672209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011859048,0.013725294,0.016947608,0.0011231863,0.0001832614,0.00017483007,0.0072782086,0.0012245411,0.018618053,0.001747035,0.0009140745,0.9262048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018626677,0.20645872,0.55141,0.0035600003,0.004431821,0.0040219855,0.046821572,0.029921541,0.06956115,0.013063677,0.051402315,0.00072054676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014842615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035570373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003969294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007168753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015904276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013278544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980807682","doi":"10.1007/s12528-019-09239-6","title":"What can completion time of quizzes tell us about students’ motivations and learning strategies?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Summative assessment; Psychology; Time management; Tracking (education); Mathematics education; Self-regulated learning; Cognition; Scale (ratio); Academic achievement; Learning Management; Computer science; Pedagogy; Formative assessment","score_opus":0.03280258115621192,"score_gpt":0.3566545169118064,"score_spread":0.32385193575559446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980807682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969727,0.00014617042,0.00047941948,0.0002309502,0.000016788681,0.000014159481,0.00017918878,0.000015145743,0.0019454543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986589,0.00008778136,0.0004138867,0.00004479561,0.000015858926,0.00001858639,0.00019578949,0.000011359736,0.00055306364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831057,0.00048923556,0.00012961449,0.00023023333,0.00057620095,0.00026415396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94726044,0.031814177,0.010904355,0.0012905556,0.0038185273,0.004911904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033640154,0.00030581185,0.0005728061,0.0016208945,0.00031271865,0.0030492248,0.0006121341,0.0010573353,0.0033456802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048438735,0.00023951233,0.00067718973,0.0010943683,0.00045813798,0.0019006804,0.0007273098,0.0010948428,0.00085374305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006652617,0.0009994531,0.95662725,0.00008381828,0.00021746862,0.000038547125,0.0016356067,0.00032039342,0.0013239839,0.00039548104,0.0005860593,0.03710661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015132213,0.00037678753,0.99549794,0.000027132259,0.0000564466,0.00003957559,0.0013324771,0.00095407374,0.000526454,0.0006072402,0.0005427386,0.000024162075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020817965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026324915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033640154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044731481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005797161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017790794},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3198134704","doi":"10.1007/s12528-021-09295-x","title":"IoT text analytics in smart education and beyond","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"IoT and Edge/Fog Computing","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Analytics; Computer science; Learning analytics; Internet of Things; Web analytics; Data science; Categorization; Big data; World Wide Web; Data analysis; Order (exchange); The Internet; Knowledge management; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Web intelligence","score_opus":0.022002032726955043,"score_gpt":0.2955306357545096,"score_spread":0.27352860302755455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198134704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21351744,0.025403384,0.30621296,0.055236153,0.0084900195,0.00050917966,0.020239202,0.021212766,0.34917888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82158595,0.010590514,0.06941041,0.0036929466,0.0036390903,0.00015439017,0.008503693,0.0011380799,0.081284925],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993262,0.00010674304,0.00006589921,0.00014337282,0.0002803254,0.000077454475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99678385,0.0013344489,0.00034071002,0.00041308717,0.00081866846,0.00030922898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069035625,0.000529231,0.00040676421,0.0039324192,0.00078570965,0.006066313,0.00061488,0.0010063368,0.015201858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003923211,0.00018614998,0.00032073463,0.0034318226,0.0011732511,0.010205572,0.0018418893,0.0009627994,0.006021809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027745418,0.00023512474,0.011902918,0.00075513,0.00005295594,0.00057760725,0.0027467129,0.00357242,0.016337298,0.15976176,0.1092778,0.6945028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026723326,0.00013048618,0.013745608,0.00070235174,0.000072518465,0.0005688732,0.0055382,0.054194488,0.023154251,0.40062782,0.5011227,0.000115991425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018183854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021873845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015201858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007723299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009484699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05085534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4207009873","doi":"10.1007/s12528-021-09305-y","title":"A scoping review of computational thinking assessments in higher education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Teaching and Learning Programming","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Killam Trusts; Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Computational thinking; Likert scale; Empirical research; Critical thinking; Higher education; Psychological intervention; Computer science; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Domain (mathematical analysis); Medical education; Psychology; Knowledge management; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1334610626915267,"score_gpt":0.4568294880976183,"score_spread":0.3233684254060916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4207009873","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017337162,0.9986393,0.00017909385,0.00038420016,0.00014416955,0.00007446459,0.00008063967,0.0000058822607,0.0003187743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017274212,0.9968635,0.0006101094,0.00040864004,0.0000713184,0.000109296234,0.00008744299,0.0000032141995,0.00011902979],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908153,0.0026124883,0.0033782911,0.00075163716,0.0022460595,0.00019620103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553347,0.033521604,0.0039458093,0.00058421603,0.0061782887,0.0004353808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015623402,0.0014909059,0.004559928,0.016833302,0.00090706814,0.0035398551,0.002412438,0.002638376,0.0035734756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05518879,0.0010996877,0.0035871016,0.013731009,0.0015366736,0.0038280897,0.0026362147,0.00222474,0.0006929843],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017029012,0.000063920575,0.0006866855,0.48777145,0.0014901925,0.00009025566,0.00042763716,0.00017377485,0.0003174054,0.0012040156,0.008727688,0.49887672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006674676,0.0001431975,0.0024235698,0.87909096,0.007132724,0.00030536696,0.00039710148,0.00009359515,0.0002852484,0.0011480671,0.10886967,0.00004367831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008925583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025205793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016833302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003172689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017300233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08262545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281726885","doi":"10.1007/s12528-022-09323-4","title":"A synthesis of surveys examining the impacts of COVID-19 and emergency remote learning on students in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"COVID-19 and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Higher education; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Psychology; Distance education; Medical education; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Mental health; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08656635490327597,"score_gpt":0.43254398899533153,"score_spread":0.34597763409205556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281726885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7084275,0.09559707,0.0017793471,0.009276966,0.0008677528,0.004264839,0.1618109,0.000117438256,0.01785833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9034274,0.054155827,0.0022077125,0.0062353634,0.00017233506,0.002940934,0.027612044,0.000058102407,0.0031903512],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335534,0.002148469,0.0031456307,0.0014308137,0.006604863,0.0033149314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479411,0.00876399,0.005668966,0.0008515727,0.033599686,0.0031747443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011602381,0.0009617149,0.002244325,0.009636264,0.0043219947,0.00456705,0.0019320253,0.0015596969,0.004076113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049488798,0.00096106774,0.0028307054,0.03057592,0.0017627489,0.0011037008,0.0032327748,0.0020291961,0.00036481413],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009523437,0.00031051206,0.841766,0.023882285,0.0029839051,0.00028468124,0.020146547,0.00053544407,0.0005540517,0.0012105393,0.034164358,0.07320943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009341741,0.00016062873,0.9512783,0.008275106,0.0010781763,0.00007071133,0.018440831,0.00015751888,0.00014789657,0.00011016692,0.02011224,0.00007493847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99015945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07938037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07938037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23248748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5759476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399336118","doi":"10.1007/s12528-024-09404-6","title":"Using text mining and machine learning to predict reasoning activities from think-aloud transcripts in computer assisted learning","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Think aloud protocol; Coding (social sciences); Affordance; Computer science; Protocol analysis; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Usability; Cognitive science","score_opus":0.04898514004665845,"score_gpt":0.29871613175074657,"score_spread":0.24973099170408813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399336118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94981056,0.0003698114,0.043639787,0.0003849095,0.00011504681,0.00039781738,0.0024086484,0.00082695024,0.0020464014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9479207,0.00023891182,0.046692077,0.00008173019,0.00005308424,0.00034254158,0.0028075445,0.000075099975,0.0017883414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976701,0.0011860268,0.00024821382,0.00042998858,0.00037071822,0.000094926356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679956,0.02728273,0.0015645571,0.0004505724,0.002317483,0.00038913774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020148666,0.00055206625,0.00032005197,0.0021757663,0.00048261395,0.0013332696,0.000589101,0.0008440989,0.001357172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020139823,0.0001972356,0.0003322544,0.0013113937,0.00034817363,0.0014826081,0.0005173173,0.0008404564,0.00095962296],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002672981,0.0028555836,0.19107443,0.0014928039,0.00031595334,0.001500399,0.026044412,0.0068434174,0.081052884,0.0015673816,0.0077002365,0.67687947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039192973,0.0028694915,0.45033407,0.00077958504,0.0006988169,0.0023889,0.036448073,0.3629253,0.11039205,0.015561024,0.016831292,0.0003794835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026542419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044052587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026542419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047240258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008380728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010655701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416936833","doi":"10.1007/s12528-025-09475-z","title":"Bridging educational equity gaps: expanding the CHAT-ACTS framework for personalized GenAI chatbots in higher education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","topic":"AI in Service Interactions","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Simon Fraser University; Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Mount Saint Vincent University","keywords":"Transformative learning; Higher education; Bridging (networking); Equity (law); Educational equity; Inclusion (mineral); Generative grammar; Instructional design; Conceptual framework; Educational technology","score_opus":0.06388826660073885,"score_gpt":0.41035297448827235,"score_spread":0.3464647078875335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416936833","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098657146,0.0008962358,0.80320954,0.0114422245,0.00047685235,0.00064528116,0.000302005,0.0049503935,0.07942026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419893,0.000257284,0.14763214,0.0009647683,0.00014672638,0.00048544616,0.00021132264,0.0003632174,0.00794975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98920596,0.007271818,0.00040896877,0.00091334153,0.0014896168,0.00071030785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621398,0.026877249,0.0014218729,0.0041337367,0.0026838623,0.0027435233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016390398,0.0008164548,0.0007352967,0.003042405,0.0033774006,0.007848121,0.0035031938,0.0033998678,0.009960752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04155677,0.00068333664,0.0006736783,0.0013520623,0.005109168,0.015828222,0.012788442,0.004272133,0.001975709],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005924962,0.001147755,0.015794031,0.0005961037,0.00007309695,0.00045409918,0.03966129,0.008329024,0.0046641254,0.5545877,0.008240023,0.3658602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013275881,0.0004370325,0.0054613417,0.00095530576,0.00018227324,0.0004854273,0.023142247,0.17532642,0.005807965,0.6685562,0.11934541,0.00016760534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004797459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006512218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016390398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021977664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005360529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08668172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}