{"meta":{"query_hash":"48eb7eb89e38","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology"},"cohort_total":159,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":159,"exported":159,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/48eb7eb89e38","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Consumer+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1971025310","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.003","title":"How we relate to brands: Psychological and neurophysiological insights into consumer–brand relationships","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":265,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Arousal; Brand relationship; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Insula; Social psychology; Mechanism (biology); Cognitive psychology; Advertising; Brand awareness; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.11195246626516141,"score_gpt":0.30816215457328094,"score_spread":0.19620968830811952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971025310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98764515,0.0021920633,0.00079000124,0.005840061,0.0015903387,0.00027753194,0.0000010849728,0.00006204176,0.0016017366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950778,0.0012817673,0.0009162407,0.0022486616,0.00023963938,0.000016314314,0.000003864422,0.000025427102,0.0001903024],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804413,0.00016443332,0.00077977334,0.00046522936,0.00025537045,0.0002910558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982871,0.00014573833,0.0006518031,0.00038880133,0.0004222607,0.00010431195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005070835,0.00028011895,0.000482747,0.0006973629,0.0002927932,0.00023552962,0.0004060005,0.0002656574,0.0003335023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004065209,0.00022005023,0.00016127678,0.00038110345,0.00037390686,0.0009343053,0.000103109225,0.000704057,0.00035350866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051435954,0.002133837,0.2583943,0.00018035749,0.0004382433,0.0004771849,0.0021173689,0.0000019002456,0.059846286,0.02693615,0.048763473,0.5955673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002264035,0.000089829795,0.7791217,0.000057185818,0.00021968126,0.0002070602,0.00016890783,0.000010596479,0.000047618876,0.013585265,0.2038948,0.00033334814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012804417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020676465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.595234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013597413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015061906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8973388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973681599","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.04.001","title":"Say no more! The liability of strong ties on desire for special experiences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Function (biology); Liability; Consumption (sociology); Cognitive psychology; Aesthetics; Business","score_opus":0.1978953222669123,"score_gpt":0.4014093935712459,"score_spread":0.20351407130433358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973681599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9417615,0.00075287063,0.000030640527,0.0033352354,0.005908269,0.00021163153,0.000012096465,0.0000045109055,0.047983274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99226505,0.00008562927,0.00017693725,0.0023183539,0.0044809678,0.00001853973,6.766598e-7,0.000007932629,0.0006459345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896854,0.00009796941,0.0004782456,0.00008582269,0.00020188752,0.0001675096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986132,0.00028134114,0.00037524596,0.00016162702,0.00048080817,0.00008782406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008284119,0.00008356825,0.00026395818,0.00006872546,0.00010398512,0.0000227866,0.00023639358,0.00004581846,0.00090798334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026304243,0.00004684622,0.000096857904,0.000016982689,0.0007737848,0.00011369281,0.000008699279,0.00017716918,0.00002654345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027904063,0.00052453706,0.008383593,0.00008049401,0.00014374667,0.00001042918,0.3568307,0.0000069540615,0.00003600264,0.1992874,0.40505612,0.026849648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010291509,0.0017791162,0.0017891931,0.00003738922,0.000029797287,0.000016959626,0.03951739,0.000004603461,0.000060225815,0.006926049,0.9487265,0.00008366569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014593234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000047561036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54367036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017611066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016518071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99417806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974084640","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.09.003","title":"The preference‐signaling effect of search","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Set (abstract data type); Choice set; Sight; Normative; Contrast (vision); Consumer choice; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20292431059418853,"score_gpt":0.4811094195206591,"score_spread":0.2781851089264706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974084640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930182,0.0004482465,0.0018725491,0.00068900746,0.0016126022,0.000059910257,0.0000015497723,0.0000032951134,0.0022946445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912673,0.00007829688,0.00044759622,0.00012555059,0.00009900426,8.420969e-7,8.411865e-8,0.0000070071906,0.000114903574],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966692,0.0010294503,0.0012341508,0.00018960927,0.00066411746,0.00021352664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893093,0.008610479,0.0008944005,0.0005352988,0.00054677087,0.00010371633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013689598,0.00010598717,0.0004904148,0.00027183202,0.00011990043,0.000110452704,0.0012157607,0.000102679056,0.00020412165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031648655,0.000051799652,0.00023369667,0.00025841774,0.00030791713,0.00012273912,0.00006689175,0.0003657554,0.00017357498],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003759819,0.000033624827,0.032116443,0.0000013578799,0.000027502421,0.000004901048,0.00008580751,0.000031696036,0.002633243,0.00021338818,0.0057308385,0.95874524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00692245,0.008027463,0.09004839,0.00022407949,0.00024792,0.0014443793,0.00042101907,0.0006360678,0.0184686,0.28335026,0.58965147,0.0005579143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029832618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004040478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9581873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000126065515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061546656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47445688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974651719","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_7","title":"Integration of Positive and Negative Affective Stimuli","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Feeling; Affect (linguistics); Negative emotion; Negative information; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.06406101117796302,"score_gpt":0.4542633843834372,"score_spread":0.3902023732054742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974651719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853646,0.0016549822,0.0060189525,0.0012120709,0.0012300544,0.00017633542,0.000019544743,0.00000579023,0.0043176548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99775934,0.00009396448,0.0015618852,0.0004386472,0.000058380883,0.0000056331623,0.0000016057411,0.000009436726,0.00007110762],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988105,0.0002320002,0.0005567525,0.000136308,0.000095485,0.00016889485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866736,0.0001580171,0.00057039334,0.0001231721,0.0003647911,0.000116266725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030564266,0.00010695526,0.00031504635,0.00025335795,0.00004067692,0.000006820834,0.00009765209,0.0001405214,0.0003848391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074400734,0.00008875704,0.00012361728,0.00014877814,0.0002891852,0.0001602528,0.000011586917,0.000376425,0.000028926679],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056199837,0.0039813863,0.028138451,0.000036451303,0.0009668762,0.000284109,0.02220905,0.000008286571,0.029941397,0.041973483,0.00999621,0.8568443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005700907,0.004815609,0.97404784,0.00023155245,0.000157008,0.0009969635,0.001674891,8.72572e-7,0.0023398884,0.0090451995,0.00085298606,0.00013626163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017398948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000676068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039642517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054928136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42137185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978688704","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.017","title":"Motivational determinants of transportation into marketing narratives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lottery; Luck; Narrative; Attractiveness; Context (archaeology); Advertising; Marketing; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; History; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02480216238613356,"score_gpt":0.3171490976185714,"score_spread":0.2923469352324378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978688704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969999,0.00010664528,0.00019494495,0.00054187415,0.0016307336,0.000074686744,0.0000020661453,0.000010092399,0.00043904074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985996,0.000027291006,0.0008659027,0.00022238075,0.00021989214,0.000003610802,0.0000074229342,0.0000103749835,0.000043513373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987977,0.000027744429,0.0007328494,0.00012671079,0.00020874548,0.000106225314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981219,0.00007601722,0.0010272905,0.0001419055,0.0006180655,0.000014774613],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007668509,0.0001009585,0.00022059189,0.00039010146,0.00007739602,0.00004034933,0.00020271947,0.00008900298,0.0009175861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015106266,0.00009233178,0.000109609035,0.00020692995,0.0001585751,0.0006326664,0.0000075552725,0.00024178383,0.00003326203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000250454,0.00015691695,0.7321325,0.000057362726,0.00003078196,0.0000063644766,0.00018797047,4.771933e-7,0.102229826,0.00059180014,0.0015052934,0.16285028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007993382,0.0000056909817,0.967995,0.0000358343,0.00005396856,0.000021517211,0.00014227646,0.000011639213,0.00041530834,0.0013455233,0.029082675,0.00009121571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001556488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014960051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23586254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004498682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003415774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980162038","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.09.006","title":"Embodied cognition and social consumption: Self‐regulating temperature through social products and behaviors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Psychology; Consumption (sociology); Social psychology; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal communication; Product (mathematics); Extant taxon; Social cognition; Social comparison theory; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.09563254831078839,"score_gpt":0.33576016633792877,"score_spread":0.2401276180271404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980162038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809763,0.00039702503,0.000007938609,0.016617108,0.0007822163,0.00019597121,0.0000074782015,0.00002424034,0.0009917524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938049,0.00029708788,0.0009850949,0.0044148588,0.0004077943,0.000008879613,0.00000219364,0.000012422259,0.000066801076],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858314,0.0002304355,0.00042176587,0.00030569584,0.0002145007,0.00024445183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999235,0.00008644259,0.00037036935,0.00006640265,0.00017875689,0.00006303605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020911687,0.00016273416,0.00029174518,0.000095208634,0.0003689549,0.000059458103,0.000109833476,0.00019845064,0.00016161946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000535831,0.00013850916,0.000053188156,0.00008978778,0.0005616402,0.00037831182,0.00003499327,0.0004248553,0.00003869803],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031289476,0.0006405056,0.011145161,0.000086260465,0.00010523477,0.000070348295,0.0033585555,2.0201888e-7,0.9243384,0.0044437796,0.041856524,0.013642115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009196808,0.0008460871,0.918351,0.00009470831,0.00038928314,0.0094642695,0.0004441153,0.0000066008934,0.017649747,0.025788695,0.017025745,0.00074292585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000017784621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.9543487e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9072059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014761312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000254464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.564824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981241179","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1202_01","title":"Misrepresentation in the Consumer Context","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Lying; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Consumption (sociology); Social psychology; Product (mathematics); Impression management; Deception; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.08488302141886868,"score_gpt":0.3256624073556235,"score_spread":0.24077938593675485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981241179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785953,0.0032161681,0.00010890497,0.0099529065,0.0016385762,0.00022304182,0.0000010820752,0.000017540111,0.006246448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926353,0.00041639505,0.000023065544,0.006417341,0.00024958208,0.000011914236,0.0000028400452,0.000011004339,0.00023252396],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860686,0.00008127713,0.0006813622,0.00016302089,0.00027817336,0.0001892787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873215,0.00012744706,0.00056402734,0.0002867096,0.00027648197,0.000013197571],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006994253,0.00012624255,0.00021966112,0.00047121875,0.000086844,0.00016899315,0.00040937838,0.0000818628,0.0021826597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014309115,0.000093709685,0.00012423232,0.0004016388,0.00015551444,0.0006471914,0.000019902787,0.00030728808,0.00092964724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012247467,0.0005975371,0.33745748,0.00002492441,0.000056229837,0.00008469549,0.00039860338,0.0000015691874,0.0013704323,0.0020369666,0.18288124,0.47496784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021120533,0.000008625905,0.49364972,0.000026456828,0.00011033287,0.0002125252,0.00044608372,0.00007041387,0.00001260746,0.0009917466,0.50221664,0.00014281634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006289719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009956261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47482502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001327471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008661429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981343329","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.01.003","title":"The role of behavioral mind‐sets in goal‐directed activity: Conceptual underpinnings and empirical evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Scope (computer science); Comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Theory of mind; Empirical evidence; Diversity (politics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Social psychology; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.14190246196639497,"score_gpt":0.49077330042023315,"score_spread":0.34887083845383815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981343329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99013925,0.005397731,0.000012699058,0.0019573956,0.0017853498,0.00015626039,0.0000072302614,0.000007758443,0.0005363339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991484,0.00017642965,0.00026429328,0.00021783431,0.00006020347,0.000011346144,4.914195e-7,0.000013529368,0.00010742698],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799407,0.00043197768,0.0008115594,0.00021494136,0.00018051692,0.00036691505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980962,0.0005395774,0.00065450097,0.0002997408,0.0002232832,0.00018669064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088501873,0.00014543401,0.0003904723,0.00021679053,0.000084933265,0.000017090735,0.00030887712,0.0002996179,0.00062858296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012104155,0.0001089988,0.00013695208,0.00022439437,0.0009723211,0.00016445231,0.00003805524,0.0012460196,0.000024390067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011988544,0.0008998711,0.5927004,0.0000039321735,0.000050591658,0.00005716986,0.002461766,4.0128423e-8,0.016658831,0.00039962566,0.0049316282,0.3806373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016038708,0.0012481688,0.9573909,0.000088000794,0.00007343172,0.0007571009,0.0010278492,0.0000045862253,0.0003905039,0.00052606943,0.03676215,0.0001273517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022813724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080052513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3805099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020614414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000127538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68825424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984452204","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.007","title":"What should we expect from a dual‐process theory of preference construction in choice?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Dual (grammatical number); Process (computing); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Criticism; Associative property; Elaboration; Psychology; Cognition; Revealed preference; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2963841047127266,"score_gpt":0.4644670012000779,"score_spread":0.1680828964873513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984452204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991172,0.0020914197,0.0007736356,0.001657221,0.0036490464,0.000109331064,0.0000067434844,0.000005759494,0.00053482794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972128,0.00074585556,0.0014613923,0.00040632312,0.00009960497,0.000005108947,4.923875e-7,0.000010109562,0.000058300797],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966969,0.00042668922,0.0017554163,0.00034978328,0.0005538469,0.00021739645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458915,0.0026157503,0.0015236724,0.00050019304,0.0006485704,0.00012264588],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018903128,0.00016234673,0.00068177195,0.0006886211,0.000035142504,0.00020051497,0.0007636228,0.0002182573,0.0031146735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012609498,0.000113918446,0.00016969934,0.00040765677,0.0003748562,0.001349828,0.000055429304,0.00044091328,0.00021316414],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021460818,0.0001898087,0.07361788,0.0000018569853,0.000033641776,0.00001833416,0.0011308269,0.000022770486,0.0018889426,0.000117346506,0.0036114322,0.91915256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018696971,0.00027708767,0.14563718,0.0002372677,0.000041727882,0.00030974296,0.0068465876,0.000046978334,0.0008564965,0.8369904,0.006665504,0.00022127418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030126546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051701274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9189313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002842309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000114687515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985354678","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.12.007","title":"Incandescent affect: Turning on the hot emotional system with bright light","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perception; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Emotionality; Incandescent light bulb; Social psychology; Brightness; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Chemistry; Optics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.045987332615590806,"score_gpt":0.36765693314333375,"score_spread":0.32166960052774296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985354678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96476823,0.00082328095,0.00081685244,0.010806918,0.0036030323,0.0003985913,0.000005643124,0.000026696876,0.01875073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964307,0.000013641002,0.0000958909,0.0021640223,0.00029341923,0.00004166613,0.0000015656291,0.000022764616,0.000936334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979743,0.0005106369,0.0006640203,0.00020350415,0.0002614132,0.00038613673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830633,0.00019267337,0.00062049384,0.000352257,0.00031185884,0.00021639516],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055683847,0.0001803379,0.0003270328,0.00022294118,0.00019470208,0.000038814997,0.00033261435,0.00015702342,0.0060690567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020126161,0.000097941054,0.00018549478,0.00017926433,0.000141337,0.00010423119,0.000015135743,0.00078882015,0.0014427288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019072529,0.0020654108,0.08590023,0.000063675696,0.00075826905,0.00048961025,0.0013372059,0.000004188063,0.0014486043,0.054283667,0.8049549,0.046787012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024937112,0.002131012,0.9324885,0.0005682839,0.0000919699,0.0047392845,0.00061506225,0.0000058481373,0.00006635671,0.00013316366,0.056470968,0.00019583126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000656569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016870672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84658825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007432973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000062705236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99933475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985658713","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.06.003","title":"The effect of food toppings on calorie estimation and consumption","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Topping; Calorie; Consumption (sociology); Estimation; Base (topology); Food science; Environmental health; Medicine; Economics; Mathematics; Biology; Horticulture; Endocrinology","score_opus":0.020071262240680367,"score_gpt":0.33438399751381764,"score_spread":0.3143127352731373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985658713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900616,0.006779108,0.00033502883,0.0018816495,0.00039417492,0.00022826083,8.031832e-7,0.000005396672,0.00031398356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864775,0.0006781032,0.00033041142,0.0002636813,0.000040156727,0.00000543234,5.566369e-7,0.000007921429,0.000026009291],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913216,0.000088171175,0.00041658024,0.00008903582,0.00014853047,0.00012551397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875057,0.0005432446,0.00031174306,0.00015262782,0.00015739031,0.00008442414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004478938,0.00009327853,0.0002865745,0.000099304714,0.000056190987,0.000015250136,0.000060911774,0.00007501128,0.00007393611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024144704,0.000054217217,0.00007439211,0.00005208242,0.00017495688,0.00005993047,0.00001172688,0.0002481259,0.000020983392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00228834,0.0001446924,0.35779974,0.00027659713,0.0015448929,0.000020659683,0.00022863706,0.0000053724157,0.036034897,0.00082311087,0.0047679804,0.59606504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015129855,0.022138365,0.93272334,0.0008617189,0.0017545931,0.0023937256,0.000039918195,0.00073630974,0.00954301,0.0016831884,0.012706139,0.00028983335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005450882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021483534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59577525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000132253235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020374255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22109139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990438176","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.002","title":"Memory markers: How consumers recall the duration of experiences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Memory test; Human memory; Process (computing); Cognition; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.06944385123857044,"score_gpt":0.42330572355584667,"score_spread":0.3538618723172762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990438176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640217,0.005949283,0.00052383734,0.016217059,0.0040031937,0.00020914084,0.000004953854,0.000011658362,0.0090591675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650806,0.00022048905,0.00039712433,0.0019232709,0.0001025429,0.000011878512,0.0000012986269,0.0000078132025,0.0008275489],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998001,0.00049328926,0.0008704937,0.0001590035,0.00019928344,0.0002769317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980975,0.00015513622,0.0010048567,0.00033527298,0.00027974445,0.00012751594],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008822826,0.00012986467,0.000330478,0.00019880537,0.00008598904,0.000017087645,0.00038033628,0.0001684469,0.0021646067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093184186,0.0000875504,0.00024407293,0.00020462618,0.00040151709,0.0001595875,0.00000885376,0.00041491783,0.00003907468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021530534,0.0011111103,0.01207122,0.000012406659,0.00023986366,0.00009719743,0.010216108,3.4694278e-7,0.0028372232,0.0012755764,0.3223741,0.6476118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057728654,0.0066987504,0.7742466,0.00021094091,0.00034011283,0.002905864,0.03221567,0.0000049105147,0.0011794505,0.001323504,0.17466883,0.000432515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012770552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7621754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019194506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006726845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993888958","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.03.002","title":"Regulatory fit from attribute‐based versus alternative‐based processing in decision making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Valuation (finance); Information processing; Promotion (chess); Outcome (game theory); Focus (optics); Marketing; Psychology; Actuarial science; Computer science; Economics; Business; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Accounting; Cognitive psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.16197710403359894,"score_gpt":0.4948438280213141,"score_spread":0.33286672398771516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993888958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798988,0.004527803,0.0087106405,0.0016289592,0.003804052,0.000160436,0.000022230905,0.000022576272,0.0012244844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99278766,0.000014748944,0.004566282,0.0023600291,0.00020900164,0.000006244688,0.000005633382,0.000018810026,0.000031596213],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974607,0.00033283085,0.0011593192,0.00031996358,0.00028597593,0.00044116733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809617,0.0002913497,0.00083374773,0.00036142216,0.00024706314,0.00017024476],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066264893,0.00020170062,0.00046675393,0.0006158034,0.000076323195,0.000027381444,0.00040153164,0.00027647134,0.0018600707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009983542,0.00018902934,0.00023411233,0.00033238635,0.00011036983,0.00017360163,0.000010942367,0.0007371403,0.00011373975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009615584,0.0018545508,0.06179964,0.000008565796,0.000044155186,0.00061942294,0.00029782136,0.000088380795,0.0005037053,0.00015049927,0.017505514,0.9075121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012814766,0.00164742,0.9687333,0.0007075624,0.0000784086,0.000060357514,0.000068895926,0.0002745468,0.00007464468,0.0011407508,0.014155463,0.00024384506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002753696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005631977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9072683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013339391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016630902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99905235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998493104","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2012.04.004","title":"How context shapes category inferences and attribute preference for new ambiguous products","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Product category; Preference; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Salient; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.1416467399768812,"score_gpt":0.31743508158067363,"score_spread":0.17578834160379242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998493104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97639734,0.009547188,0.0017124686,0.009511844,0.0023270368,0.00033739395,0.000004341035,0.000030361509,0.00013200997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665415,0.00044326446,0.00024153873,0.0009782254,0.0009196002,0.000014247646,0.000007404823,0.00001399375,0.0007275495],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989494,0.000023926808,0.0004070659,0.00018543654,0.00015558445,0.0002785962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854994,0.00005386414,0.00063681783,0.00014863546,0.00056020706,0.000050523213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004785749,0.00015951238,0.0002916551,0.00028402836,0.0001154141,0.0002897272,0.00021543085,0.00009781811,0.00014496829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026742482,0.00013426409,0.00007241228,0.00016382335,0.00012948219,0.0014621833,0.000037977345,0.00017397887,0.00005752962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002325453,0.00019449511,0.19546893,0.00010796084,0.000103609054,0.000001935571,0.00015193422,9.7652084e-8,0.005713986,0.0025285399,0.070593886,0.7249021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013293629,0.000017117805,0.5842095,0.00002800225,0.00020323839,0.00006606989,0.00018218976,0.000003861594,0.00012616163,0.0008861717,0.41278175,0.00016658344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000060701263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039604256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7247355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010316568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054603803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54751307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000159472","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.03.006","title":"Might an overweight waitress make you eat more? How the body type of others is sufficient to alter our food consumption","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Society of Counseling Psychology","keywords":"Psychology; Overweight; Consumption (sociology); Taste; Obesity; Food intake; Advertising; Social psychology; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.07964645912712104,"score_gpt":0.40914370237655695,"score_spread":0.3294972432494359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000159472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97855824,0.00022812425,0.00054506597,0.012794803,0.005968357,0.00027347033,0.00003927653,0.00001486014,0.0015778233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915696,0.000079073616,0.00053942937,0.005469557,0.00035232396,0.0000077279365,0.000005677677,0.000032128297,0.001944503],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980675,0.00036719072,0.00063800684,0.00030973597,0.000310079,0.00030751817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979568,0.00006459429,0.0005861198,0.0006761959,0.0005118982,0.00020437974],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060141867,0.00022149117,0.00038929295,0.0003434693,0.00008272223,0.00004206769,0.00043299393,0.00028974342,0.0055075632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057806392,0.0001468418,0.00018224028,0.000178015,0.00020470077,0.000115247036,0.000019743447,0.00068904174,0.0003709121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028740268,0.0019852093,0.10249959,0.000024478086,0.0007373342,0.000041858093,0.022388738,0.0000065960544,0.48681092,0.0033069619,0.35718754,0.022136763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003214839,0.0024540396,0.57189584,0.000039156148,0.00018976627,0.001007578,0.0035898623,0.00008666116,0.004796674,0.000099484794,0.41225398,0.00037210714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017290986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000082917424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48201424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022969698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037889935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99540156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002218385","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2008.01.006","title":"Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Harvard University","keywords":"Construal level theory; Construals; Moderation; Psychology; Salient; Perception; Social psychology; Extension (predicate logic); Computer science","score_opus":0.09972234728913311,"score_gpt":0.33655612276723795,"score_spread":0.23683377547810486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002218385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947958,0.0007789568,0.000081293394,0.00264997,0.0010696396,0.00029503397,0.000017727256,0.000012123761,0.00029946674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653745,0.00018856015,0.0002769916,0.0025381176,0.00008014794,0.0000086418,0.0000014387718,0.000020503818,0.00034817425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977489,0.00013096823,0.0012130142,0.0002477421,0.00043421146,0.00022517359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966564,0.00021398292,0.0012927845,0.0005382438,0.0012509912,0.000047570797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076638395,0.00019855979,0.00052684604,0.00047914285,0.00017859772,0.000031748517,0.00048546767,0.00013271101,0.0008173661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007793077,0.00015217434,0.00027282446,0.00047134547,0.0006051101,0.00036728205,0.00008822502,0.00028586952,0.000109111694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006650257,0.0007052864,0.693904,0.0000771847,0.00027747868,0.00008012898,0.0005811044,0.0000116546935,0.24399486,0.0006182457,0.03476725,0.018332565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025417854,0.000028253899,0.96962875,0.00011656472,0.00018315359,0.0005496305,0.00017680717,0.000012977028,0.0005470775,0.0003325104,0.025706531,0.00017597504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045814195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037073678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27572474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019347188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002181614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89495856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003106209","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_9","title":"Deliberative and Automatic Bases of Suspicion: Empirical Evidence of the Sinister Attribution Error","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Flattery; Attribution; Categorization; Psychology; Counterfactual thinking; Context (archaeology); Perception; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Negative information; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Prosocial behavior; Information processing; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16137319264456476,"score_gpt":0.4010947533406288,"score_spread":0.239721560696064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003106209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99296635,0.0013114703,0.0014178316,0.0032909904,0.0007395511,0.00012707918,0.0000012291584,0.000006530398,0.0001389672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987183,0.000066281245,0.00016048917,0.0009223571,0.00007522996,0.0000014016829,7.591923e-7,0.000005887923,0.000049272985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986874,0.000054825825,0.00079191884,0.000113988805,0.0002337012,0.00011816186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979369,0.00019881465,0.0010408203,0.00019620522,0.0006121043,0.000015165352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009955178,0.000095110096,0.0002520934,0.0002247214,0.000070657625,0.000029454062,0.0001869085,0.00007471516,0.00021379492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023415346,0.00006639694,0.000112796966,0.000279374,0.00030731206,0.00042146438,0.000046860812,0.00015692641,0.000010777215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036130237,0.0002455845,0.82699984,0.00014792853,0.000070389426,0.0000068949657,0.00015778042,9.635108e-7,0.016762102,0.0005911005,0.0044511277,0.150205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067648134,0.00002183235,0.98733366,0.00022275552,0.00018473537,0.000069856294,0.00009692353,0.00004474403,0.00083043927,0.0003005649,0.010146388,0.000071620874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010998544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031005504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16033384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012502846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034162153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27075887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003255980","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.006","title":"Beyond fit and attitude: The effect of emotional attachment on consumer responses to brand extensions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Forgiveness; Brand extension; Social psychology; Extension (predicate logic); Advertising; Word of mouth; Attachment theory; Brand awareness; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.05233002880185165,"score_gpt":0.3475650031702383,"score_spread":0.29523497436838664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003255980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924118,0.0010414737,0.00006097401,0.0045457683,0.0010897975,0.00029386143,0.000006558691,0.000013300246,0.0005364971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967822,0.0003239232,0.000064269145,0.0022919523,0.00017025681,0.0000128241745,0.0000029208663,0.000014829918,0.0003368442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984734,0.00012800243,0.00062924775,0.00022362512,0.00035943656,0.00018625337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830884,0.00048145524,0.00050039694,0.00031771613,0.00034983314,0.000041774398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008469135,0.000181789,0.00036678542,0.00048799106,0.00026753452,0.000054192387,0.00024927585,0.000083631894,0.0004295131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030118597,0.00012248452,0.00014458057,0.00026546486,0.0003562951,0.00023788291,0.000061009006,0.00025743147,0.00018011121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031379876,0.00031075103,0.83308965,0.00006220522,0.00023691155,0.00006663839,0.00012422733,0.00000941203,0.0084852,0.000722699,0.072528385,0.08122595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020971366,0.00010531588,0.92412806,0.00006838865,0.00018973058,0.00035068698,0.000016674916,0.000005740719,0.00017862713,0.00011034205,0.07262122,0.00012810707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015923673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009741663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0910384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000138033765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030819505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4994774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003385461","doi":"10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70029-3","title":"What is a <i>Leather Iron</i> or a <i>Bird Phone?</i> Using Conceptual Combinations to Generate and Understand New Product Concepts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Product (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Comprehension; Locative case; Property (philosophy); Conceptual framework; Epistemology; Mathematics; Linguistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.07300376290215348,"score_gpt":0.39091348958223915,"score_spread":0.31790972668008566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003385461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532635,0.016748147,0.017826777,0.003910362,0.005449763,0.00043126632,0.000011420746,0.000038570335,0.0023201555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97033435,0.00087938656,0.0027339181,0.021986889,0.0007158507,0.000003867092,0.000002191521,0.000070324386,0.0032732063],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977925,0.00026040542,0.0007702613,0.00041445176,0.00027205373,0.00049034564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982748,0.00021347855,0.00048362467,0.00032938735,0.0003170594,0.00038164612],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008434114,0.00026324388,0.000500403,0.00033851416,0.00012818919,0.00009724648,0.00021714832,0.0001950966,0.0017240103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064880995,0.00021169556,0.00011807958,0.00040130145,0.00039816636,0.00036680046,0.000031557105,0.00039708093,0.00014592701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010861942,0.0027186684,0.011024345,0.000057628302,0.0023532095,0.00225736,0.18432808,0.000008722766,0.08436605,0.008318567,0.4124375,0.2812679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07416384,0.0072688493,0.026200905,0.0008260336,0.00280617,0.033699878,0.18347153,0.000021181888,0.016807932,0.015911857,0.63536775,0.0034540512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006249928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011575449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27781385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056650344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016103689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004793615","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.05.002","title":"Compensatory knowledge signaling in consumer word‐of‐mouth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Word of mouth; Psychology; Ideal (ethics); Product (mathematics); Social psychology; Relevance (law); Advertising; Epistemology; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04374443141528304,"score_gpt":0.31365051999225996,"score_spread":0.2699060885769769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004793615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928597,0.0027904117,0.000049594528,0.00051855267,0.0016380503,0.0002248137,0.0000011863067,0.000019463807,0.0018981836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987609,0.0001512499,0.00019232584,0.0005227155,0.00018358724,0.000012927998,0.0000035898538,0.00002153596,0.00015117956],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808776,0.00007024316,0.0011600892,0.00021098071,0.00020961963,0.00026128028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978502,0.00012945615,0.0009726178,0.00027866798,0.00073643826,0.00003263035],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006943517,0.0001840489,0.00046813823,0.0009827615,0.000058644462,0.00009697931,0.00037690392,0.00013476965,0.0023419117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107872744,0.00017079167,0.00016797536,0.0004662482,0.00023475195,0.0007677576,0.00005306942,0.0003684706,0.0010328394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018934596,0.00074340875,0.40455762,0.00012976238,0.00012163361,0.00002255238,0.00023612403,0.00000442407,0.045621734,0.000735446,0.019691546,0.5279464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025555247,0.000005812345,0.92679435,0.00014390063,0.00012795652,0.000046356305,0.00026894026,0.000033108397,0.00020342958,0.0011534977,0.06842894,0.0002382089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011249336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056319856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52770823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024366896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005917794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005420535","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2008.12.003","title":"Limitations to the deficit attenuation hypothesis: Aging and decision making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive aging; Life span; Working memory; Neuroscience; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.29446453410473733,"score_gpt":0.42785292093620075,"score_spread":0.13338838683146342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005420535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9670173,0.0005740316,0.0011870023,0.029961986,0.0006220046,0.00009894522,0.0000013514358,0.000010261156,0.00052714057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804825,0.00041342375,0.0021560444,0.016838113,0.000081978644,0.0000019801257,2.7575421e-8,0.0000051617635,0.000020775526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903584,0.000114119095,0.00033892787,0.00018553421,0.00015595813,0.0001696155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877095,0.00074450887,0.00021413431,0.00014282555,0.000078413104,0.00004919141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028036622,0.000096130774,0.00016590052,0.00017162476,0.00020323337,0.000034036966,0.00020725711,0.000043391436,0.000010947024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00056159165,0.00005924658,0.000055121654,0.00022845688,0.00009977236,0.000117227544,0.000020689029,0.00021795649,0.000045724653],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015461593,0.00008963472,0.004918195,7.7328633e-7,0.000007006146,0.000049617232,0.00032858827,0.000013901323,0.09999328,0.00016324667,0.006924031,0.8873571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013102021,0.0011098693,0.93008584,0.00012644862,0.00013941384,0.0029867075,0.00022621755,0.000013866754,0.0035168421,0.031488705,0.028727945,0.00026791738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.476783e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000044462254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9251677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008922183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008004389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24160054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005521174","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_7","title":"Buyers Versus Sellers: How They Differ in Their Responses to Framed Outcomes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Promotion (chess); Transaction cost; Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Business; Advertising; Computer science","score_opus":0.23289350444889675,"score_gpt":0.4811013462976919,"score_spread":0.24820784184879516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005521174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.962902,0.00024198402,0.00033272483,0.032859694,0.0028086172,0.000101213715,0.000012320549,0.000010083325,0.0007313229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937385,0.00009013578,0.0026892326,0.0028599962,0.00012414262,0.0000028345955,2.1231054e-7,0.000016595957,0.00047840294],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970498,0.00046863875,0.0011539017,0.0003754463,0.00055574864,0.0003964594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99367607,0.0044545727,0.0006379433,0.00065742614,0.0003100276,0.00026394025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035339496,0.00021562536,0.00074210524,0.0011815235,0.00006265301,0.00019994396,0.0011836719,0.00020061429,0.00055706874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042482875,0.0001350679,0.0002955638,0.00037316803,0.00013279551,0.00034912667,0.000090617126,0.00048902136,0.0005186994],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033189019,0.0002998544,0.20750955,4.49591e-7,0.00006684385,0.00009129845,0.0015148654,0.00009712187,0.0005833068,0.000034145196,0.039067045,0.7474166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005003882,0.0007099616,0.5266544,0.000036446898,0.000033039603,0.00021650172,0.0017464444,0.00004049279,0.00014706743,0.012300243,0.45275912,0.00035242064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000051937504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019172927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7470642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009628262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011397454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6667005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005880396","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.006","title":"Gender differences in the meanings consumers infer from music and other aesthetic stimuli","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Meaning (existential); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Perception; Cognition; Product (mathematics); Aesthetics; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Communication; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10804044683544554,"score_gpt":0.34828281018408674,"score_spread":0.24024236334864119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005880396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949787,0.00015916539,0.00021850318,0.002478786,0.00033777658,0.000053676533,0.0000033320414,0.0000062887234,0.0017637264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882245,0.00015972074,0.00019751588,0.011348894,0.000033335513,0.000002021604,1.3271382e-7,0.000009135094,0.000024720895],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986425,0.00033458235,0.00039251547,0.00020768806,0.00023694482,0.00018574049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923176,0.00016530744,0.00026385946,0.00021935746,0.00003793427,0.00008175627],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042117812,0.00012928674,0.00026888863,0.00019295697,0.000069799506,0.000061614126,0.00035772473,0.00010482528,0.001387852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015696997,0.00007833297,0.0000839251,0.00017691938,0.00063537265,0.000104085666,0.000020204958,0.0005008334,0.00005610693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019653393,0.00053392764,0.6279288,0.000004850578,0.000032149142,0.00022985922,0.013725312,0.0000015621289,0.27930504,0.0021589512,0.0031335677,0.07274943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046956465,0.0003077639,0.86672235,0.00003968043,0.00024929462,0.0045338795,0.0022883874,0.0002673186,0.00047541937,0.014496742,0.105390295,0.00053324545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034679495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000080371414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27882963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000042919314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031343603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007458405","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.001","title":"When consensus counts: Exploring the impact of consensus claims in advertising","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Advertising; Product (mathematics); Consensus theory; Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Social change","score_opus":0.08051667894085131,"score_gpt":0.42063920976277436,"score_spread":0.34012253082192306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007458405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476396,0.0016979768,0.000023416023,0.0065440177,0.0016311064,0.00008248392,0.0000022313618,0.000007835709,0.04237137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816626,0.0006555865,0.00013798628,0.0006890522,0.0002264961,9.565791e-7,1.4401797e-7,0.0000056825056,0.00011783974],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850285,0.00042036956,0.0005342155,0.000100959565,0.00017834011,0.00026323856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988818,0.000350462,0.0003673961,0.00013410277,0.00019479754,0.000071432325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009316529,0.00008736799,0.00030024807,0.00016298868,0.00008100709,0.000012443974,0.00027169377,0.00011373735,0.0003775044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023370223,0.00006319043,0.00017581394,0.00020806822,0.00055351196,0.000051676114,0.000007607657,0.00033935768,0.000028213619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016250701,0.0008237962,0.112621635,0.000007838839,0.00051992194,0.00035960856,0.043989122,0.000023284203,0.008321759,0.014278373,0.32704663,0.49038297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030924983,0.0011473763,0.76522446,0.00016643172,0.00006747159,0.00049424305,0.0053853933,0.0000072543053,0.000064222884,0.08713521,0.13690357,0.0003118643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021874718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000091817485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65260285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007617454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016647432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41334084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007576031","doi":"10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70013-x","title":"Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1729,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Construal level theory; Construals; Psychology; Social psychology; Social distance; Space (punctuation); Self construal; Personal space; Psychological research; Affect (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Communication","score_opus":0.1470319541203007,"score_gpt":0.5143595044582734,"score_spread":0.3673275503379727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007576031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866867,0.0030526423,0.0021232227,0.00078898726,0.003913236,0.0004947481,0.000030413677,0.000022024195,0.0028880443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777234,0.00010727237,0.0005763877,0.0010405548,0.00028177907,0.00004005935,0.0000057644556,0.00001660193,0.00015924968],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743485,0.00046468197,0.0010333166,0.0003786809,0.00033252785,0.00035595588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791384,0.00042328538,0.0005467359,0.00029498903,0.0004950589,0.00032607926],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019348365,0.00018512619,0.0003630501,0.00033354576,0.00014566812,0.000023606204,0.00013433279,0.00028643094,0.0009488559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021977058,0.00015744967,0.00009991309,0.00020977059,0.0004416762,0.00013458963,0.000017265176,0.0005558279,0.000034898152],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008783313,0.0011232665,0.5303386,0.000012821234,0.00008873343,0.00015775044,0.00049294875,1.1941998e-7,0.0005167979,0.0025913268,0.022781767,0.44101754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044340547,0.0022405253,0.9835221,0.000060311882,0.00025280446,0.0022843406,0.00021016615,0.0000010844692,0.00007321839,0.001061775,0.00573626,0.00012334166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007740387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012290954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4531835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040081086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003220162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007898479","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1202_05","title":"The Moderating Role of Involvement and Differentiation in the Evaluation of Brand Extensions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Brand extension; Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Recall; Social psychology; Brand awareness; Advertising; Cognitive psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.09252462689255028,"score_gpt":0.3280617242940875,"score_spread":0.2355370974015372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007898479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938689,0.004015378,0.00006110278,0.0012303251,0.00025206484,0.0001818861,5.640485e-7,0.000001966426,0.00038781276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991825,0.0005469137,0.000021561973,0.00017866062,0.000047677997,0.00000863075,0.0000013948671,0.0000040602845,0.000008607135],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878484,0.00011759278,0.00058747904,0.000082618535,0.00034499686,0.000082488135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984781,0.00013515374,0.0007020788,0.00016363079,0.0005154692,0.000005572094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017019388,0.00006582788,0.00014174315,0.00019216542,0.00010777671,0.000058308746,0.00014814813,0.000038677284,0.000108844884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016699318,0.000040756277,0.00005191296,0.00016600153,0.000102658516,0.0002464109,0.000018855202,0.000121039666,0.0000036458075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009046739,0.00036890866,0.17509738,0.000031015315,0.000061479856,7.3184594e-7,0.000917638,0.000025788555,0.025452457,0.0021705993,0.0013340919,0.79444945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016167068,0.000010077494,0.982882,0.000046573925,0.00024243814,0.0000129117025,0.00079792854,0.0072554764,0.000096910204,0.0044020973,0.00257873,0.00005812762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026883174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010930324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8077847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007366614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009004899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16619928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008067058","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2007.10.010","title":"Gender‐related reactions to gratuitous sex appeals in advertising","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; sort; Advertising; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04987992278751698,"score_gpt":0.4036093049361725,"score_spread":0.3537293821486555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008067058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93135816,0.003555214,0.0023787818,0.0015369398,0.0066266847,0.00026168514,0.0000051087445,0.000044624154,0.05423278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931995,0.000076920696,0.0010569816,0.0021297156,0.00025330813,0.000008382587,0.0000030556848,0.000038479382,0.00323365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665177,0.0003872607,0.0016214093,0.0004093148,0.00022943382,0.00070078904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981448,0.00029722802,0.0005768349,0.00049170386,0.0001842844,0.00030514327],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00223592,0.00024272955,0.00052054925,0.0014346068,0.00012282631,0.000012225567,0.00041558914,0.00051184307,0.002565548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008088019,0.00024418856,0.00019443284,0.0006156873,0.00023452124,0.00015067146,0.000028173918,0.001184303,0.0008633292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032011461,0.0039167623,0.6887532,0.000020321932,0.00079000683,0.0059936815,0.015131269,0.000038404778,0.029793808,0.013191248,0.1464837,0.09268645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002678445,0.00041885264,0.86228585,0.000040492494,0.00006839232,0.0065857694,0.00064621906,2.7311188e-7,0.000044043514,0.0034339842,0.123555094,0.0002425586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018674868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065442015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17353268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010936424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063243206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009706815","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.019","title":"The influence of involvement on the endowment effect: The moveable value function","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment effect; Loss aversion; Moderation; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Endowment; Function (biology); Economics; Negativity effect; Prospect theory; Arousal; Risk-seeking; Microeconomics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06578126432249025,"score_gpt":0.40464076763814,"score_spread":0.33885950331564973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009706815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876438,0.00020060297,0.00011363024,0.0068755923,0.0034706153,0.00019254706,0.0000023089624,0.0000031408742,0.0014978104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99729383,0.00009052947,0.000053931388,0.0023010995,0.000098836244,0.000008235372,7.580311e-8,0.0000065351664,0.00014689934],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727476,0.00050515763,0.0010535525,0.00019270788,0.00077202916,0.00020179572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902343,0.0071373945,0.0012207526,0.00092088134,0.00042300948,0.000063668194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010144999,0.0001269427,0.00028031997,0.00012723537,0.00031996606,0.00015307916,0.0014202177,0.000091241534,0.00019896994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022052168,0.00004479765,0.00021089285,0.00025656805,0.00047099573,0.00012613198,0.00008358674,0.0007025999,0.00018770272],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012965329,0.0003417081,0.039513502,0.0000018474119,0.0001636606,0.000013190794,0.0004604239,0.001422098,0.02626333,0.012545333,0.056478456,0.8614999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013960835,0.0019535252,0.2764664,0.000044932767,0.000117831914,0.00017104943,0.00043231304,0.000105459694,0.002485755,0.22701545,0.48964867,0.0001625126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017318804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041480074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8613374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019016114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007404338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35160744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011761262","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.006","title":"Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":965,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Credibility; Scale (ratio); Skepticism; Brand extension; Perception; Indexicality; Brand experience; Source credibility; Brand management; Existentialism; Brand engagement; Advertising; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; New product development; Product management; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03913175926418747,"score_gpt":0.3123765293929301,"score_spread":0.2732447701287426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011761262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825876,0.0006229108,0.012353034,0.001604399,0.0015330703,0.000116203126,7.4507096e-7,0.00002679641,0.0011552689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703825,0.000107271575,0.0006337456,0.0017777605,0.00037634766,0.000004573865,0.0000016450365,0.000014284541,0.00004614382],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987626,0.00007163294,0.0004908139,0.00020240949,0.00030877948,0.00016374583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986056,0.00005056029,0.0004960415,0.00023684611,0.00057252665,0.000038440252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011541354,0.00014637271,0.00028301193,0.00033834678,0.00012545372,0.00021099615,0.00021354629,0.000106628126,0.00033035397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022749147,0.00011841063,0.00008050897,0.00016494178,0.00017790245,0.000668347,0.000030630068,0.00029185566,0.00008556655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034135173,0.00043488623,0.1583378,0.000048746617,0.000111041016,0.000005581839,0.0003783202,5.7351275e-7,0.008395308,0.005964544,0.0048855203,0.8210963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002111999,0.000049397568,0.7970857,0.00018729981,0.00038432988,0.00009473681,0.00027573522,0.0001516396,0.00013293828,0.023133904,0.1760932,0.0002991222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021575917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000703047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8207972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014805815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017758943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48286453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013833032","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_11","title":"To Be or <i>Not</i> Be? The Influence of Dissociative Reference Groups on Consumer Preferences","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":421,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dissociative; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Consciousness; Social psychology; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Clinical psychology; Business","score_opus":0.07388413050762731,"score_gpt":0.33531064344077083,"score_spread":0.2614265129331435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013833032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98898387,0.00017875344,0.000029316889,0.007959116,0.0006081756,0.00026164667,0.000018631501,0.000020682304,0.0019397985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919237,0.00015876027,0.000060017705,0.007260039,0.00015883666,0.000021362708,0.0000075803523,0.000015328418,0.00039435655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797666,0.000089477355,0.0009311308,0.00026001604,0.00048665176,0.00025606778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972259,0.00033508954,0.0012267901,0.00037112617,0.00081310864,0.000028032484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007094861,0.00021075684,0.0003951215,0.00037482355,0.00016915218,0.00012819796,0.0006153277,0.000119937264,0.00047659368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002848437,0.00013519269,0.0001256528,0.0005013146,0.00030049123,0.00049502053,0.00006643994,0.0003570586,0.00014302511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074606324,0.0022184495,0.5319637,0.00019750174,0.0005930499,0.00006663604,0.00083759584,0.00015784954,0.049693864,0.03160701,0.2306877,0.14451602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090605195,0.000042811833,0.82183737,0.00007080387,0.00017540148,0.000017897131,0.00016105075,0.0000020416987,0.00022376749,0.00088235026,0.17550956,0.00017092201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002207926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042212312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28987366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024514375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061327075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55129975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014483843","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.02.002","title":"If money doesn't make you happy, then you probably aren't spending it right","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":388,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Affect (linguistics); Empirical research; Advertising; Monetary economics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0614117158498477,"score_gpt":0.3447917360453473,"score_spread":0.28338002019549957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014483843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3833999,0.0019010454,0.003168394,0.004377961,0.014656533,0.00048677827,0.000028817618,0.00012126678,0.5918593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854232,0.0004827603,0.0026053193,0.004510784,0.00097092835,0.000025025422,0.0000049052933,0.00007584961,0.0059012175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99562025,0.0007722512,0.0015661739,0.00070652855,0.00043231843,0.00090245693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968376,0.0002418349,0.0013722857,0.0008857061,0.0002333764,0.00042918065],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015863964,0.00048520623,0.00090848294,0.00061014626,0.00018852873,0.000049797003,0.0008774547,0.00066369,0.01699113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014521508,0.00036687084,0.00043984514,0.0003938095,0.00044442306,0.00017188043,0.00006338954,0.0014197789,0.0018954328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007225929,0.004230762,0.35433432,0.0000617803,0.0036662803,0.004184825,0.016937144,0.000006657964,0.0062855887,0.027923288,0.40900186,0.16614157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004350536,0.0015566322,0.45657355,0.00014444996,0.0003417216,0.005464356,0.00092688284,0.0000033060553,0.0002170229,0.026824988,0.5028748,0.00072176225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000102795304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020996611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6020233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000069451984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046075624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018504323","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1603_10","title":"Forgiven But Not Forgotten: Covert Uncertainty in Overt Responses and the Paradox of Defection‐Despite‐Trust","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Loyalty; Covert; Psychology; Conviction; Social psychology; Dimension (graph theory); Robustness (evolution); Marketing; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02130626723618851,"score_gpt":0.28716830719261544,"score_spread":0.26586203995642693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018504323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9889083,0.0009606246,0.00014984897,0.006292532,0.000499839,0.00015599375,0.00000443461,0.0000084225885,0.0030200295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937032,0.00011579108,0.000047870784,0.005681053,0.00027682158,0.0000043276427,0.000001964733,0.000011670305,0.0001573097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856395,0.00012315746,0.00073773175,0.00014980456,0.00021456995,0.00021078381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983731,0.00044924382,0.00074329047,0.00020364669,0.00021839947,0.000012309658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015876764,0.000140435,0.00043865875,0.0003608449,0.00008474692,0.000054744065,0.0002334261,0.000108381886,0.000085405896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018647914,0.000097643075,0.00014257425,0.0003309099,0.00029705127,0.0003826515,0.00005505181,0.0002876973,0.000015189061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015018788,0.000561087,0.9149729,0.00028177002,0.00025314832,0.00008775517,0.000294272,0.00035000444,0.0020842091,0.03836078,0.018461164,0.009274099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008712373,0.00006722967,0.8534939,0.00008356868,0.00016122164,0.00014835408,0.00035551673,0.00034405952,0.000060969767,0.017297372,0.119078115,0.00019729299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018914526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008072128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100616954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001905182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033724024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39817688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019530192","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.004","title":"Using visualization to alter the balance between desirability and feasibility during choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Visualization; Balance (ability); Relation (database); Psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Social psychology; Business; Artificial intelligence; Data mining","score_opus":0.30126496269282393,"score_gpt":0.5226896680242005,"score_spread":0.22142470533137654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019530192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941969,0.00084367365,0.0025938407,0.0009225057,0.00092701067,0.0002622851,0.000008706963,0.000011011431,0.0002340679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983293,0.000036666028,0.0004999229,0.000784788,0.00023867021,0.0000049259634,7.997959e-7,0.000012756784,0.00009219095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980849,0.0005184624,0.0007400949,0.0002304327,0.00013681586,0.00028928675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987154,0.00016841409,0.00036160985,0.00033603932,0.00021306002,0.00020548623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072299666,0.000120536846,0.00029916584,0.00013080706,0.00023519335,0.000011105966,0.00020218054,0.0001235159,0.00034347447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012729257,0.00008957037,0.00010713494,0.00021330168,0.00024231063,0.00012155999,0.0000319182,0.00034517748,0.000029327828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017163069,0.00016232347,0.9945505,0.000009105969,0.000034404722,0.0000128203765,0.0005424524,6.9944014e-7,0.00083403126,0.00005216471,0.0011865776,0.0024432898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000998687,0.000255492,0.9949178,0.000026211997,0.000046406352,0.0006860626,0.000041971314,0.0000025961067,0.00007481845,0.00011627927,0.0027512165,0.00008247744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007872137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020846113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041323816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005708026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042289652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37608045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020837212","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.04.006","title":"Why brands should fear fearful consumers: How attachment style predicts retaliation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Attachment theory; Consumption (sociology); Social psychology; Style (visual arts); Anxiety; Advertising; Business; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.09263983007208887,"score_gpt":0.40635371733858044,"score_spread":0.3137138872664916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020837212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71550196,0.0123087065,0.0764658,0.030752255,0.023236867,0.0014159968,0.00007432666,0.00024796728,0.13999613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908126,0.0003634057,0.0025203968,0.002865584,0.0002531375,0.000013754709,0.000016930198,0.00005090853,0.0031032693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973982,0.0004949107,0.0008429587,0.00035575498,0.00041354567,0.00049460377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765074,0.00018554034,0.0010591673,0.00051556807,0.00032969884,0.0002592676],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093342457,0.00029912096,0.00052985956,0.00048046315,0.00013978052,0.000041140473,0.00044755486,0.00053116586,0.0026156045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000744378,0.0002547739,0.00028754177,0.00030304576,0.00036919376,0.00032365503,0.00004051476,0.0008915793,0.00025558053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012303223,0.0008714274,0.7850592,0.000021165906,0.0013852307,0.00023921729,0.005061477,0.0000028025768,0.00031675358,0.004671456,0.19217099,0.008969957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010328952,0.0018735717,0.7105407,0.00010706717,0.0009056057,0.0019304076,0.0017421301,0.00009894248,0.00007873725,0.0026983,0.26898497,0.00071059115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022894454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019396444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27531067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006891322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000684495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020949311","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.10.001","title":"The role of network centrality in the flow of consumer influence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Odds; Opinion leadership; Psychology; Perception; Field (mathematics); Social psychology; Social network (sociolinguistics); Position (finance); Advertising; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Social media; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.013273276100830563,"score_gpt":0.33978280606976136,"score_spread":0.3265095299689308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020949311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94927144,0.0056687994,0.0000070207293,0.0049763946,0.0006233464,0.000119285534,0.0000025646336,0.0000037365687,0.039327398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711865,0.0019728786,0.000106816085,0.0006337666,0.00014000361,8.615673e-7,1.3766252e-7,0.0000026538617,0.000024247021],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759245,0.0010440057,0.0006123738,0.00007724707,0.0003731711,0.0003007372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997532,0.0014185112,0.00057233457,0.00016541523,0.0002469371,0.000064805376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040953406,0.00007199683,0.00026385777,0.000039734037,0.00013996314,0.000026862179,0.000561253,0.00010387063,0.000016121006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015228592,0.000043994198,0.000116236755,0.00032459528,0.0008951741,0.000106064304,0.000009970952,0.0003007149,0.0000024985056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063379644,0.00044236347,0.47438744,0.000007601887,0.00011646778,0.00002127796,0.025657399,0.00006246028,0.00028369465,0.025551066,0.01087691,0.46195954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066509965,0.00019357867,0.6288289,0.000089659494,0.000039248396,0.000016059526,0.005864931,0.00000389977,0.000023679257,0.06841529,0.29575887,0.00010082234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010657214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022951904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46185872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016767422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017247252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32983062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021885792","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2012.04.002","title":"Unconscious creativity: When can unconscious thought outperform conscious thought?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Creativity; Psychology; Deliberation; Novelty; Duration (music); Cognitive psychology; Consciousness; Cognition; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.05677706053244605,"score_gpt":0.38878358164376453,"score_spread":0.33200652111131845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021885792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88563126,0.006680088,0.0010475143,0.012961018,0.025670066,0.00045994646,0.000059136106,0.0001069706,0.067383975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811355,0.00039619967,0.0012876063,0.0077818767,0.0011790236,0.000026874872,0.0000037125353,0.00005885732,0.008130383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957081,0.0008914871,0.0011990865,0.0004917619,0.00055572734,0.0011538333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99561316,0.0011387569,0.0011799731,0.0009413224,0.00037526427,0.0007515045],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020156973,0.0004542139,0.0008846487,0.00068500574,0.00029663305,0.00008018783,0.00082847214,0.00035473352,0.0034228563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006034924,0.0003854818,0.00033549187,0.00057298096,0.0012156592,0.00045242565,0.00008393656,0.0010773051,0.00059550686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057235005,0.002951728,0.60531557,0.000019592742,0.00041917764,0.00022078006,0.012226738,0.000001725277,0.004145901,0.0055364706,0.32258135,0.046008587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003808609,0.00083251396,0.13402909,0.00005617558,0.00031619065,0.0124774305,0.0023363777,0.0000026553043,0.0012412241,0.0016897892,0.84250695,0.0007029777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000636199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001704557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5199256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014572288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039139856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023252713","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_10","title":"Attitudinal Balance and Cause‐Related Marketing: An Empirical Application of Balance Theory","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder","keywords":"Balance theory; Balance (ability); Perception; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Social psychology; Alliance; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Marketing; Economics; Business; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02525004594408763,"score_gpt":0.3284546547226638,"score_spread":0.30320460877857613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023252713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903654,0.0013426302,0.0013384367,0.001993266,0.00029401004,0.00008411548,0.0000017458974,0.000018092735,0.004562301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975998,0.00005490695,0.00028862758,0.0016287074,0.0003550101,0.000002120743,0.0000056753893,0.000011803625,0.00005338426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875975,0.00011753637,0.00060943194,0.00017790806,0.00016603865,0.00016936296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859077,0.00014807674,0.0008004663,0.00019541821,0.0002467753,0.000018517669],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017450931,0.00011807825,0.0003047021,0.00018752657,0.00006193785,0.00003224136,0.00020133828,0.00011529449,0.00013135083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006266213,0.00010332742,0.000059621638,0.00026471293,0.00016799523,0.0004043393,0.00003352795,0.0002388016,0.000024348396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057327637,0.00029677537,0.97578603,0.00011741915,0.00007509008,0.000017937287,0.00003783802,0.000008965004,0.0013022008,0.008543168,0.0046013994,0.00863989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001190163,0.000030527284,0.9410252,0.000035803052,0.000107983076,0.00012753734,0.000056030218,0.0004251398,0.00001030911,0.012126073,0.044737842,0.00012740707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052992247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034145272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04013644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008819994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015659236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42135698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023548979","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_6","title":"Malleable Mental Accounting: The Effect of Flexibility on the Justification of Attractive Spending and Consumption Decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder","keywords":"Mental accounting; Flexibility (engineering); Ambiguity; Consumption (sociology); Control (management); Construct (python library); Process (computing); Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Accounting; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.19941157557364297,"score_gpt":0.4636348922484119,"score_spread":0.26422331667476895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023548979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99630046,0.00033525037,0.0004321479,0.0010845712,0.0007769678,0.0001886333,0.000014358151,0.0000025326276,0.00086506346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995623,0.00008938374,0.00019659352,0.00005899338,0.00004286712,0.000001924009,6.368019e-7,0.0000059308486,0.000041367937],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973258,0.0005506898,0.0012227834,0.00023326003,0.0005331593,0.00013430037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987206,0.010233182,0.001768967,0.0004921893,0.00026418263,0.000035493507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007379828,0.00011878469,0.00041136766,0.00024916357,0.0001790373,0.00006891587,0.00055150536,0.000095385156,0.0002513976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022357749,0.00005629499,0.0001698885,0.00021595914,0.00051326735,0.00019972592,0.00005510443,0.0002944544,0.00004020466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020847507,0.00034863883,0.54850286,0.000005648411,0.00008068457,0.0000068609065,0.00031441025,0.00020971987,0.021637134,0.0012737943,0.013614104,0.4119214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014904465,0.000840412,0.9511925,0.00010988701,0.00015141601,0.0003171828,0.0004458798,0.00022528124,0.008474466,0.029095676,0.0075276485,0.00012918231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000164623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015462509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41179222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003168665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002834771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27526274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026774436","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.02.001","title":"Distinct threats, common remedies: How consumers cope with psychological threat","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Coping (psychology); Psychology; Underpinning; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Variety (cybernetics); Cognitive psychology; Psychotherapist; Computer science","score_opus":0.09550420526936651,"score_gpt":0.4015056228186057,"score_spread":0.30600141754923915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026774436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82178706,0.015430081,0.0019562899,0.014989089,0.0076494245,0.00049568585,0.000029320296,0.00011626347,0.13754681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926537,0.0008284646,0.0010986768,0.0029717563,0.00045532905,0.000016160095,0.000011467725,0.00005369342,0.0019107338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663246,0.0007305756,0.0008106895,0.00050244376,0.000613297,0.0007105243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967061,0.00037857803,0.0009161737,0.00068277045,0.00062017917,0.00069619203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013775384,0.0004169833,0.001038222,0.0002469767,0.00018576134,0.000061365965,0.00070097443,0.00055189943,0.00088896166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002034556,0.00029176928,0.00027556787,0.00041444966,0.0011925742,0.00022595774,0.00006941372,0.0011098632,0.00036432702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011862225,0.0021539896,0.38232768,0.000022569156,0.0013194665,0.0032639545,0.0057267314,0.0000013468476,0.00023749187,0.00537393,0.4425447,0.1451659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022963556,0.009188138,0.2719254,0.00019259633,0.00069638324,0.014959659,0.005800903,0.0000038337976,0.000039974566,0.013562563,0.6595349,0.0011321112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040306026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010327739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21699019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000088188055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012985255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030425029","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.04.003","title":"The psychology of appraisal: Specific emotions and decision‐making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Appraisal theory; Set (abstract data type); Affect (linguistics); Priming (agriculture); Nature versus nurture; Social psychology; Cognitive appraisal; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.11216205831459232,"score_gpt":0.4599030133255678,"score_spread":0.3477409550109755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030425029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524499,0.01373692,0.012114306,0.0024127015,0.008367169,0.00016671488,0.000010458951,0.0000181488,0.010723679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990247,0.0010686108,0.007837641,0.00047959673,0.00019429367,0.0000064779138,7.7829236e-7,0.00002894334,0.000136629],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977998,0.00031385935,0.0010497682,0.00025696555,0.00024141313,0.00033817696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709433,0.00081934285,0.0007697184,0.00061741355,0.00050239614,0.00019677039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013920288,0.0001762566,0.00043973466,0.0003316867,0.000120996156,0.00002680679,0.00045473356,0.00022437613,0.00029032535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021761874,0.00012164957,0.000160667,0.0003008682,0.00071921694,0.000097244694,0.00005327795,0.0005123514,0.000092666516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012221531,0.000764046,0.059634924,0.000004360932,0.00028237922,0.00016467785,0.0011691989,0.000004510672,0.0008794266,0.023002956,0.33406124,0.57881016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033374212,0.0007730368,0.5240299,0.000054691707,0.00010848935,0.0048076985,0.0007044692,0.0000019111878,0.0000065197237,0.011925607,0.4540817,0.0001684866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005008342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011192574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57864165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016530228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005830606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49607256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032789956","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.008","title":"Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":311,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Loyalty; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Interpersonal communication; Friendship; Social psychology; Advertising; Trustworthiness; Marketing; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04857950007491632,"score_gpt":0.30274036531799203,"score_spread":0.2541608652430757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032789956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99401206,0.00010041095,0.00018479803,0.0024729082,0.0024023978,0.00021475952,0.000004555148,0.000018393124,0.00058970193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800056,0.000099701094,0.00037413414,0.0011055635,0.00021103262,0.000007024115,0.000002442951,0.000021851383,0.00017765898],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818695,0.00007251184,0.0008817666,0.00023087612,0.00041160223,0.0002162751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699867,0.0003270283,0.0013865619,0.00050132134,0.0007565508,0.000029849449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012558548,0.00017297026,0.00040845908,0.0003965267,0.00016305133,0.00015711391,0.0005912852,0.00012614558,0.00049432076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054727343,0.00011432405,0.00019445042,0.0004337134,0.00018880563,0.00060939527,0.00008794868,0.000470446,0.000078185745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014201254,0.0005072286,0.49583268,0.00016068404,0.00033804536,0.000022393748,0.0037487927,0.000013723071,0.41263273,0.008181912,0.002698489,0.07444319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022788804,0.00003772199,0.9401913,0.00024101663,0.0006720901,0.00023104399,0.0036323757,0.00004040253,0.01722982,0.0037513315,0.031265516,0.00042846543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002833439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004973508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44435868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000865991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048097227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5412466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033022458","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.004","title":"When are moods most likely to influence consumers' product preferences? The role of mood focus and perceived relevance of moods","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Feeling; Mood; Focus (optics); Product (mathematics); Regulatory focus theory; Social psychology; Perception; Affect (linguistics); Preference; Cognitive psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.02056025374906147,"score_gpt":0.2863733121932656,"score_spread":0.26581305844420416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033022458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99227434,0.0027826356,0.00006226624,0.003335047,0.00031324447,0.00032218092,0.000006531761,0.000014952243,0.0008887839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845254,0.00045422817,0.00035862694,0.0005891392,0.00007472222,0.0000060957695,0.0000015197121,0.000012002843,0.00005113622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982057,0.00006837209,0.0009097953,0.00027953068,0.00032389475,0.0002126661],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970683,0.000100354446,0.0013582506,0.0004406446,0.0009927828,0.000039659662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056293426,0.00019617564,0.00045293983,0.00037246232,0.00010130655,0.00008154815,0.0005015984,0.000090520174,0.00010820666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003850858,0.00014980503,0.000097787124,0.00038499883,0.00028450176,0.0005725467,0.000055781904,0.0002876338,0.000023808936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059785874,0.00038477214,0.49562094,0.000067736255,0.00012150495,0.0000031649945,0.0005184286,0.000008837038,0.0992178,0.0007491913,0.0014126931,0.4012971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009667821,0.000051779763,0.98368096,0.00014899096,0.0002177973,0.000045534875,0.00030354547,0.000016150425,0.0011230374,0.0038038248,0.00947755,0.0001640641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010857866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000110396046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001174168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049663242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61088717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033153019","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1502_5","title":"When Categorization Is Ambiguous: Factors That Facilitate the Use of a Multiple Category Inference Strategy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Cued speech; Ambiguity; Inference; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Product category; Concept learning; Perception; Product (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14715482868470045,"score_gpt":0.3529718958089943,"score_spread":0.20581706712429385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033153019","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20276915,0.0005550287,0.79475725,0.0015089611,0.00015838382,0.00011292052,0.000005613585,0.00003896869,0.00009375062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97125745,0.00048340062,0.027380094,0.00070703594,0.000022908145,0.0000032548307,0.0000015292223,0.000009863837,0.00013444455],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815136,0.0002488336,0.0007460398,0.00025163763,0.00034506127,0.0002570832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973906,0.00038692105,0.0009878444,0.00067616464,0.00046922502,0.00008919295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036787603,0.0001926344,0.00040100812,0.0003159324,0.00007465689,0.00007781144,0.0010808021,0.000121214354,0.000057378224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018116305,0.00012830878,0.00018264093,0.00031346525,0.0002386311,0.0013243795,0.00009118434,0.00037057788,0.000012720532],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020504967,0.00089731393,0.24633284,0.000043053427,0.0009911698,0.000053071017,0.01866339,0.003995233,0.029304702,0.0067336746,0.02888595,0.66389453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053242734,0.0022332568,0.3760942,0.00017282854,0.0005147676,0.0006780905,0.0010023145,0.035325777,0.08483753,0.09209806,0.3997776,0.0019413066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018272562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011701117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76848835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042551866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000105282095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52322805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034578887","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.04.001","title":"Yes, we have no bananas: Consumer responses to restoration of freedom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Stockout; Reactance; Negativity effect; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04370532795642939,"score_gpt":0.3216361349764938,"score_spread":0.2779308070200644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034578887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96907216,0.0044908845,0.0015410234,0.009357816,0.004052718,0.00040458224,0.000009617281,0.000049643957,0.0110215405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954638,0.00037170722,0.0017458963,0.0012691636,0.00047559015,0.000011018899,0.0000027131396,0.000042824016,0.0006172989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978157,0.00012863614,0.001061417,0.0002694368,0.00040294262,0.00032185722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967891,0.0002898332,0.0011519786,0.0004660031,0.0012576077,0.000045471425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001265276,0.00025133727,0.00068681524,0.0009169146,0.0001093149,0.00007223837,0.00045658578,0.00013582232,0.00037532765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012910586,0.00022048721,0.00019585897,0.0003607664,0.00029051356,0.00048136702,0.00012904019,0.00030258534,0.00055153965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013708515,0.00024385046,0.82608443,0.000099384204,0.000272288,0.00004357187,0.00014124821,0.000005011205,0.007325172,0.0014806228,0.0957118,0.067221776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015111055,0.00013300388,0.21800077,0.00013838518,0.00030835017,0.00004714501,0.000103932325,0.000031510008,0.0000416232,0.00023351578,0.7792073,0.00024336598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014652082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039340145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6834955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029546703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054158754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89912075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035762353","doi":"","title":"Gendered Behavior in a Male Preserve: Role Playing at ESPN Zone Chicago","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Sports, Gender, and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Mediation; Spectacle; Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Ethnography; Social psychology; Advertising; Sociology; Social science; Business; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.04971949556837153,"score_gpt":0.36913022083742086,"score_spread":0.31941072526904934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035762353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9795262,0.002932772,0.00011668602,0.0018346471,0.0009036962,0.00017242397,0.000003181948,0.000014336334,0.014496032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99503213,0.0012996081,0.0009856089,0.00075784116,0.00024795494,0.000009733057,0.000001258409,0.000015222475,0.0016506657],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981414,0.00020022379,0.00057949475,0.00021150318,0.0004032491,0.0004641056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899846,0.00006983069,0.000385176,0.00020541741,0.0001270189,0.00021411454],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011773589,0.00012782993,0.0003393627,0.00015439183,0.00026766214,0.000028000763,0.0003847639,0.0002855787,0.0011384705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000090336616,0.00012384816,0.00021101645,0.00025945305,0.00043311375,0.00019301394,0.00004125064,0.0004601057,0.00003430084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002843894,0.0007860376,0.8993693,0.000007470487,0.00011674528,0.0006524036,0.08452932,0.000033038308,0.0041489736,0.0018157064,0.004729596,0.0035270203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056117936,0.00024012283,0.82423234,0.0000411776,0.00011035793,0.00083722186,0.035305288,0.000001759048,0.00014033412,0.0019058939,0.1312078,0.00036593506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063990976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029197605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1264782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023863922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035116266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99977463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042062366","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.01.009","title":"The effects of advertising models for age‐restricted products and self‐concept discrepancy on advertising outcomes among young adolescents","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Product (mathematics); Young adult; Advertising; Similarity (geometry); Age groups; Phenomenon; Product category; Mandate; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02783136064890742,"score_gpt":0.29909530883576957,"score_spread":0.27126394818686217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042062366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99307126,0.0021132864,0.00089824124,0.00057332637,0.0026306084,0.0005344379,0.0000015625168,0.000032602813,0.00014466849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890447,0.00026276888,0.00023221385,0.00028929074,0.00016193707,0.000015556438,0.0000042190027,0.0000226853,0.0001068913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846303,0.00006340202,0.0006980911,0.00023765444,0.0002981593,0.00023963791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979934,0.00016717147,0.0009043044,0.00028773892,0.0006002542,0.000047109042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043111516,0.00018386217,0.00035137954,0.00029005206,0.00019189135,0.00015009624,0.00026226227,0.000088719986,0.000001953724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064067787,0.00013174812,0.00011631255,0.00023292926,0.00019293465,0.00072182604,0.00004848911,0.00019626907,0.000004032113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008879313,0.0007777418,0.80154425,0.00050280854,0.00032578254,0.00004001363,0.0006321389,0.000021189942,0.0019576421,0.0017162166,0.0069266325,0.18466768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004068364,0.0000474898,0.98822147,0.00036797812,0.00037156098,0.00002790493,0.00008563715,0.00017860491,0.000102445294,0.0023443676,0.0039993017,0.00018487888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051758856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028601458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18667723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003141987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047382528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53725326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044962840","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.03.003","title":"Some things you should know about structural equation modeling but never thought to ask","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Ask price; Psychology; Sample (material); Causal model; Epistemology; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.4069029522542973,"score_gpt":0.5005120825237724,"score_spread":0.09360913026947515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044962840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8508249,0.0018974275,0.12672389,0.008226991,0.011060037,0.00013336635,0.0000050111416,0.000028874565,0.001099506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8429693,0.00019008122,0.14618118,0.008475714,0.0014621662,0.000003157142,7.030203e-7,0.000026820984,0.00069086836],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953356,0.00055779755,0.0017528425,0.0005033958,0.0013523374,0.00049804134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900472,0.0064983736,0.0011908318,0.000732626,0.0011929368,0.00033802656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010020649,0.00023983575,0.00068435946,0.0013152038,0.00019969154,0.00023840176,0.0014915885,0.00031995456,0.00054062845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047377273,0.00016172983,0.00026808112,0.0012733117,0.00013269576,0.0016441734,0.0001395911,0.001288944,0.00014310775],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006431093,0.000114768714,0.07292837,0.000008111561,0.000189756,0.00009899939,0.0013128895,0.0026440648,0.046285428,0.009137635,0.025432069,0.8412048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044235047,0.0009539404,0.16314884,0.00012279785,0.00017365141,0.0032509838,0.0012347908,0.058412317,0.0010021436,0.5031003,0.26300016,0.0011765879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025058087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049825294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8400282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025602114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011632291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96064705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046173622","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.06.002","title":"The impact of perceptual congruence on the effectiveness of cause‐related marketing campaigns","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tellabs (Canada)","funders":"Louisiana Board of Regents","keywords":"Operationalization; Congruence (geometry); Psychology; Perception; Elaboration; Social psychology; Conceptual model; Computer science","score_opus":0.028300850268048693,"score_gpt":0.3219714999547726,"score_spread":0.2936706496867239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046173622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99633396,0.00020373419,0.00006937608,0.00032850288,0.00079827337,0.00017928505,0.0000018479387,0.00000804673,0.0020769536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996764,0.00009073965,0.0000057057373,0.00009644792,0.00007061543,0.0000054036777,0.0000015666523,0.000012449337,0.000040675277],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816877,0.0005804111,0.0006975132,0.00013419216,0.00024398734,0.0001751002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995698,0.0021803558,0.0011334274,0.00034858251,0.00062397606,0.000015689498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052886773,0.00013769981,0.00030260233,0.00020133304,0.00016454812,0.00006254375,0.00042967845,0.00008199361,0.00037135897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012109187,0.000074818556,0.0002544999,0.00027921627,0.0004241865,0.00019367179,0.00003536614,0.00029732345,0.000050212566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042372383,0.00052978937,0.7688652,0.00014507216,0.0008060043,0.000007490678,0.00018475781,0.00007189259,0.07709668,0.00944314,0.006402778,0.13220991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095879566,0.000040636805,0.9955961,0.00013800088,0.0001387707,0.000033986722,0.00012780339,0.00007316196,0.00013107527,0.0008285849,0.001847462,0.00008562167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006453922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010354847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22673085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020691963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039220264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40661204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050415243","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.009","title":"When consumers care about being treated fairly: The interaction of relationship norms and fairness norms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Distributive property; Psychology; Social psychology; Distributive justice; Social exchange theory; Microeconomics; Economics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.04212640554415257,"score_gpt":0.31466957384857186,"score_spread":0.27254316830441927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050415243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925816,0.0026002903,0.00023297725,0.00094089593,0.0016901763,0.00019053639,0.0000027930178,0.000021618394,0.0017390857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901116,0.00020021742,0.000072903385,0.00036494795,0.00021147609,0.000009850068,0.000013786945,0.000018674253,0.00009699174],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858147,0.000066878245,0.0007477792,0.00015066218,0.00022543092,0.00022778429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997971,0.00017550573,0.0010002758,0.00025977273,0.0005588676,0.00003459464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059418305,0.00016918118,0.00029719068,0.00044251452,0.00020267277,0.00011482727,0.00022720805,0.0001247043,0.0002939141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015289032,0.000119901,0.0001304346,0.00025539586,0.00026772238,0.0013608555,0.000045878387,0.00035212756,0.000075098054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014981131,0.000083674786,0.90753394,0.000062823136,0.00007970731,0.000001852353,0.00064763724,7.428721e-7,0.0008452458,0.0015324802,0.001287644,0.08777444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011381919,0.000009637296,0.94412965,0.00007553275,0.00038602273,0.0000739032,0.001488515,0.000010150149,0.000099678204,0.00053227326,0.051910143,0.0001462896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011564563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006352924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.087628156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029486515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021341742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4889421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054228886","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_4","title":"No One Wants to Look Cheap: Trade‐Offs Between Social Disincentives and the Economic and Psychological Incentives to Redeem Coupons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coupon; Incentive; Rationality; Microeconomics; Marketing; Economics; Public economics; Business; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.06047784393979987,"score_gpt":0.3386871999109385,"score_spread":0.2782093559711386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054228886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665458,0.0006378834,0.00015657082,0.030347649,0.0006497438,0.0003393137,0.000010048437,0.00002015437,0.0012928223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946047,0.00028511824,0.0003149411,0.0036000756,0.0009647597,0.000014570106,0.0000036925467,0.000016086748,0.00019604468],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849564,0.00008090616,0.00066311244,0.0003244428,0.00017107,0.0002648351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991299,0.00009690929,0.0004110032,0.00018055455,0.000115075294,0.00006655166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079767476,0.00018635708,0.00044088243,0.00029818385,0.00026913252,0.0002628099,0.00029926954,0.00011331831,0.0003171988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000832697,0.00014351247,0.00010550986,0.00014824704,0.00045145483,0.00048615245,0.00009806459,0.00027582826,0.00035563819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002848918,0.000489311,0.12622492,0.00003760336,0.00032652484,0.000008955922,0.0009249715,0.0000012439729,0.0030491468,0.0052970992,0.056414623,0.80437666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027099987,0.000024123248,0.814243,0.000027107677,0.0001807623,0.00002368535,0.000110019675,0.000009378543,0.000009887997,0.00044115802,0.18205228,0.00016858146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001870664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003725547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8042081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003836898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018212992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58522683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057125807","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.002","title":"Does dirty money influence product valuations?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Product (mathematics); Preference; Monetary economics; Consumer spending; Advertising; Microeconomics; Business; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.0813921654672168,"score_gpt":0.34357382887532323,"score_spread":0.26218166340810645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057125807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711306,0.00016353877,0.00086368306,0.021041352,0.003001009,0.00010742756,0.000003454207,0.000021788797,0.0036671634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882034,0.00025517,0.00092773495,0.009941956,0.0002869402,0.000004591994,3.7366706e-7,0.000010259461,0.00036959132],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980742,0.00044230715,0.0005624724,0.00031029768,0.00035137194,0.00025935227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986138,0.0002809458,0.000458345,0.00031529844,0.00019289619,0.00013874883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087236846,0.0001395557,0.00027157276,0.00019572387,0.00011317007,0.00002185689,0.00044530688,0.00007413985,0.00021638296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011932732,0.00008060209,0.000108052314,0.00018567737,0.00036983774,0.00024910067,0.000032625027,0.00036092114,0.00026933267],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064175465,0.0011804807,0.061713852,0.000026447693,0.0000877211,0.000090751535,0.00034450178,0.00027841938,0.790592,0.0057868967,0.055044375,0.08421279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030643563,0.00080739334,0.5659821,0.00007320908,0.000080601894,0.0019040152,0.000016247823,0.00006174536,0.038802102,0.05493455,0.33388394,0.00038973137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000023767427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015092621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7517899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018303881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004159726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34618166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057562146","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.01.002","title":"Looking ahead or looking back: Current evaluations and the effect of psychological connectedness to a temporal self","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social connectedness; Psychology; Premise; Association (psychology); Product (mathematics); Social psychology; Point (geometry); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0823957099913069,"score_gpt":0.40484076584142475,"score_spread":0.32244505585011785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057562146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920953,0.0016415403,0.0007719602,0.0019501058,0.0024782561,0.0005239479,0.0000018907685,0.00002542417,0.00051160215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987451,0.00009894243,0.00019656865,0.0005812681,0.00028917848,0.00002511825,0.0000036341523,0.000015255234,0.000044977543],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805343,0.0002676598,0.0008478847,0.00024348343,0.00037771664,0.0002098388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978174,0.00033796302,0.0008154041,0.00029906296,0.00067214726,0.000058025067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028200508,0.00018946845,0.0004974233,0.00043238467,0.00011153627,0.00014270193,0.00034770818,0.00009322336,0.00030206674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071502913,0.00011188937,0.00013491652,0.00047018952,0.00026447358,0.0003670545,0.00008279197,0.00031121552,0.00014957367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007836725,0.00052321225,0.43898198,0.00019245513,0.00023945289,0.000023283772,0.0006770794,0.000011789567,0.0010743358,0.0013389874,0.026534872,0.52256584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.042610314,0.0005451485,0.6587162,0.0006054063,0.0021745048,0.0008350258,0.00046309887,0.00047048082,0.00016214156,0.002583823,0.29007095,0.0007629093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024278372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029513045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5218029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023438146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004488551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45627162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060807386","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2012.05.007","title":"Erratum to “Why brands should fear fearful consumers: How attachment style predicts retaliation” [J. Consum. Psychol. 22 (2012) 289–298]","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Order (exchange); Style (visual arts); Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Economics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.06621672389358627,"score_gpt":0.3367071598506664,"score_spread":0.2704904359570801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060807386","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046665445,0.09843057,0.0041012466,0.13541715,0.5903821,0.007579586,0.0007072875,0.0011493461,0.115567245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3367824,0.021380046,0.0023931123,0.080988735,0.037408013,0.00078576995,0.003349057,0.0015465354,0.5153664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927901,0.0002968243,0.0024588504,0.0012213766,0.0018337822,0.0013990438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913251,0.00017423186,0.0040354887,0.0016856707,0.00239561,0.00038389608],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023709487,0.0012480334,0.0019546952,0.0028541947,0.000507113,0.0013140853,0.0017756359,0.0016303869,0.005905533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00049878954,0.0012148094,0.0009282867,0.0012545937,0.00054947473,0.0026041232,0.00031278786,0.0031294671,0.0028279624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005521273,0.0006701498,0.018970853,0.00030737204,0.0007393976,0.00006195032,0.00010407278,7.1341793e-7,0.00045018367,0.00021378689,0.92828804,0.04964135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003635234,0.00006480923,0.0828027,0.00049731456,0.0017927303,0.00026894014,0.00013301901,0.000011032047,0.000009643323,0.00022487005,0.909453,0.0011067219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008758238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001660466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5529741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023031053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036064524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060973217","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.03.002","title":"Models, monitoring, and the mind: Comments on Wansink and Chandon's “Slim by Design”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Psychology; Food intake; Value (mathematics); Food choice; Focus (optics); Social psychology; Computer science; Psychotherapist; Medicine","score_opus":0.095683158362012,"score_gpt":0.4148151991415095,"score_spread":0.31913204077949753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060973217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9598119,0.010970358,0.008318843,0.012989507,0.0037257122,0.00035691902,0.000011564066,0.000010656376,0.003804527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960101,0.0008057003,0.0004504664,0.002122523,0.00015717455,0.0000148132185,8.5065375e-7,0.000016020971,0.00042230106],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824375,0.00068380544,0.00049466034,0.00017989986,0.00012667097,0.0002712054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882215,0.0003149693,0.00036189822,0.00023472247,0.00008531104,0.00018096801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010824561,0.00014284806,0.0003373791,0.00012157541,0.00013178021,0.00002510564,0.00017520729,0.00015311546,0.00014445082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026799347,0.00009410191,0.000080710015,0.00005425357,0.0003224282,0.00007861189,0.00002068317,0.00047667164,0.000028153685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006178709,0.0010953967,0.019967195,0.00001645294,0.00036195913,0.000030128933,0.0027367661,0.0000025593129,0.00031421677,0.004963364,0.2887301,0.67560315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.081432365,0.013353332,0.17606176,0.00062416535,0.00096034916,0.003736519,0.0013491224,0.00038063046,0.00048286823,0.022050295,0.69853187,0.0010367219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003343658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020354526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6745664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012131802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011250449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38373643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061404251","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2008.12.010","title":"Consumer reactions to the decreased usage message: The role of elaborative processing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Promotion (chess); Need for cognition; Corporate social responsibility; Regulatory focus theory; Elaboration likelihood model; Marketing; Social cognition; Persuasion; Business; Social psychology; Public relations; Creativity","score_opus":0.026611152594295216,"score_gpt":0.3188904159507371,"score_spread":0.2922792633564419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061404251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95784605,0.005698476,0.0012502639,0.026776338,0.0012095193,0.00059315015,0.000007405238,0.000042592485,0.006576187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956869,0.00015543216,0.00014728236,0.0035858396,0.00023599448,0.000012273003,0.0000030449078,0.000012012064,0.00016121008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842966,0.00009309873,0.0007709484,0.00018155364,0.00031694525,0.00020779122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974817,0.000116686744,0.0010247726,0.000381752,0.00096387725,0.000031221658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000982072,0.00016075096,0.00027207384,0.00033040243,0.00030038864,0.00018215075,0.00052815734,0.000078776226,0.00035345877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002740082,0.00009744903,0.00013825623,0.0007376393,0.0001961218,0.0005694888,0.000030198302,0.00035310636,0.00015111126],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046964508,0.00045315485,0.025620097,0.000021495704,0.00012450026,0.0000092781365,0.00051561155,0.000011234031,0.038133003,0.0027854026,0.02009949,0.9117571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075706,0.000018442048,0.33368987,0.00006434059,0.0002994192,0.00006768383,0.0006417954,0.00004298265,0.00039966786,0.002135243,0.6617435,0.00013994348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042915566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040137667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91161716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017025935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008355599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39738563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062581021","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.07.002","title":"The good, the bad, and the ugly: Influence of aesthetics on product feature judgments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Color perception and design","field":"Psychology","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Aesthetics; Feature (linguistics); Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Point (geometry); Product design; Perspective (graphical); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Art; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01711537268854723,"score_gpt":0.33860545676163306,"score_spread":0.3214900840730858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062581021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94102114,0.0015553263,0.00002005067,0.04635336,0.0024088179,0.0003233159,0.0000031448544,0.000006706083,0.008308109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99305886,0.0006209025,0.00007647508,0.0046610893,0.00018155498,0.000012484297,2.0997437e-7,0.000013905973,0.0013745362],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982646,0.0006113939,0.00046827557,0.00017744883,0.00024748498,0.00023079534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761397,0.0007823146,0.0005836559,0.0007071141,0.0002435336,0.000069412534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019092129,0.0001479569,0.00027070733,0.00007777903,0.000223058,0.000036171114,0.0006021949,0.0001465085,0.00021960617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024483263,0.00006182612,0.00012355433,0.00015714693,0.0014905625,0.000042267082,0.00003427252,0.0012324825,0.000076319484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015119011,0.0011301193,0.07263664,0.000017192964,0.0011389898,0.00008843407,0.012021409,0.0000247779,0.022985753,0.10168106,0.467484,0.30567262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003589198,0.00046717408,0.47479787,0.000016045728,0.00009973833,0.001661554,0.00033024728,0.0000025604716,0.00007441324,0.0031027156,0.51575613,0.00010233695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008502071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032559106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4021612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006354681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045544206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54920393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063414602","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1303_13","title":"Fairness and Discounts: The Subjective Value of a Bargain","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Loyalty; Value (mathematics); Equity theory; Transaction cost; Promotion (chess); Database transaction; Equity (law); Perception; Marketing; Microeconomics; Construct (python library); Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Business; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.030681116520096245,"score_gpt":0.3873318985018485,"score_spread":0.35665078198175226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063414602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628391,0.004056045,0.00006707716,0.0014677503,0.00059201266,0.000094938165,0.0000025301574,0.000001896973,0.030878652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983815,0.0010249055,0.00020877745,0.0002623402,0.0000316796,0.0000026301968,4.173104e-8,0.0000046094187,0.00008354697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990229,0.00035294823,0.0002947942,0.000082936676,0.00010642627,0.00013998651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926597,0.0001873242,0.00030519546,0.00008668093,0.00010693829,0.000047884318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000944198,0.00006480478,0.00021339873,0.00005405299,0.00015490565,0.000014326574,0.00015229985,0.000052720236,0.00007209309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015985154,0.000044778426,0.00005816847,0.000085714324,0.0009731643,0.00011798406,0.00001637972,0.00013641769,0.000003994137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020062678,0.00039691964,0.6029342,0.0000069997322,0.00036530607,0.000023874345,0.053067923,0.0000032724574,0.0068984693,0.32780918,0.0034100416,0.004883239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065194187,0.001320671,0.48484695,0.00012313513,0.00042804165,0.0005180612,0.16678128,0.0000031559132,0.0068286057,0.14870106,0.18319607,0.0007335608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017093924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018288264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17978603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039764167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008674427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35856643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066512469","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.001","title":"Calories, beauty, and ovulation: The effects of the menstrual cycle on food and appearance‐related consumption","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Beautification; Consumption (sociology); Menstrual cycle; Luteal phase; Beauty; Psychology; Food consumption; Product (mathematics); Ovulation; Advertising; Economics; Medicine; Biology; Business; Follicular phase; Agricultural economics; Endocrinology; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024157584993411935,"score_gpt":0.33082335485074676,"score_spread":0.30666576985733485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066512469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97347724,0.018789366,0.00003031599,0.0014402,0.005017112,0.00024237286,0.000005913618,0.000008579874,0.0009889241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868524,0.0002898908,0.000034250435,0.0006620855,0.00016609943,0.000009710617,7.405513e-7,0.000013798609,0.00013817825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831635,0.0005598014,0.0005106853,0.00016492672,0.00016382775,0.0002844161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985539,0.0004079921,0.0005363743,0.0003291662,0.00007688323,0.0000957316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000650401,0.0001555395,0.00028711907,0.000112733076,0.00019681186,0.00000743489,0.0001903,0.00025124586,0.0002378557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006372804,0.00009535685,0.00008666789,0.000105401756,0.0010937614,0.00010961297,0.000033635835,0.0005898573,0.000032586428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064162794,0.00058626605,0.919446,0.000039791135,0.00050682534,0.000010402866,0.0049244566,0.0000011117536,0.0014944639,0.055890903,0.0070165163,0.00944166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026404778,0.00065448496,0.9868359,0.000063612206,0.000191279,0.0014778173,0.00010128887,5.728163e-7,0.000045616725,0.002425465,0.0054690554,0.000094439136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034716397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049034425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06738991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019419316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017430433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40300098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072207893","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_7","title":"Effects of Culture, Gender, and Moral Obligations on Responses to Charity Advertising Across Masculine and Feminine Cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Masculinity; Moral obligation; Femininity; Psychology; Social psychology; Individualism; Perception; Morality; Preference; Individualistic culture; Collectivism; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07369839698876791,"score_gpt":0.43370397075660316,"score_spread":0.36000557376783526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072207893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891075,0.008185918,0.00011194998,0.0006327825,0.00057634624,0.00016895564,0.000025581881,0.000010884474,0.0011801196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972298,0.00051601714,0.00079504045,0.0006157252,0.00017564806,0.0000057067577,0.000003298639,0.000009267396,0.0006494787],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985997,0.00021395466,0.0005257275,0.00024261672,0.00016283947,0.00025513477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998985,0.00022193635,0.0003332091,0.00014823838,0.00018245318,0.00012917939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000268467,0.00018464356,0.0004370423,0.0001237348,0.000104700826,0.000030764386,0.00013599727,0.00016858998,0.000053944023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012481744,0.00012643574,0.00009327595,0.00015859639,0.00023040175,0.00008189528,0.00003537172,0.00027337723,0.000007311395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006231209,0.0017639917,0.6724939,0.0002486308,0.0009790942,0.0003460522,0.025161503,0.000012251232,0.14577277,0.018205307,0.093235046,0.035550244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002132301,0.00083951786,0.98804253,0.00008522101,0.00008557154,0.0005106699,0.0005597368,0.0000018386626,0.0011559887,0.001993449,0.004448775,0.0001444039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068330424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019610485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31554863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010713042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011365154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51558995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072724031","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.001","title":"Attenuating depletion using goal priming","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ego depletion; Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Self-control; Control (management); Social psychology; Goal pursuit; Consumption (sociology); Goal setting; Task (project management); Resource depletion; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11519197102148145,"score_gpt":0.4656964741097772,"score_spread":0.3505045030882958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072724031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966753,0.0008485207,0.022489293,0.0007288734,0.0044388883,0.000085929605,0.000002057843,0.000016742802,0.004636673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931147,0.000014897969,0.004838161,0.001391386,0.00046145433,0.0000031042389,0.0000013479414,0.000021464457,0.00015344917],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805725,0.0004182286,0.0008616643,0.0001702949,0.0001476326,0.00034492576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985185,0.000115752555,0.00074789725,0.00023754715,0.00021713172,0.00016316496],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010279821,0.00012059178,0.0003033534,0.0002596485,0.000110855326,0.000015522586,0.00020200055,0.00017310685,0.0011832998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010052377,0.00011099411,0.0001924825,0.00013768983,0.00010004894,0.00011728519,0.000017834092,0.00048147835,0.00017296585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009318742,0.0009876499,0.28212008,0.00003498791,0.00023075676,0.00009724242,0.0013810182,0.000012722872,0.013513643,0.004779569,0.028672164,0.6672383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006901755,0.0031147397,0.75143474,0.0003797681,0.00041379037,0.0061837123,0.00061958836,0.0002749253,0.00016134228,0.0016125089,0.22836615,0.00053699256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004509438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011155623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6667013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039457856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037662598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074224305","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.03.006","title":"The limited effects of power on satisfaction with joint consumption decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Alberta Health; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Power (physics); Orientation (vector space); Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Joint (building); Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09001193481324883,"score_gpt":0.3735681785202299,"score_spread":0.28355624370698107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074224305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99051934,0.00090970204,0.00006911997,0.00050385704,0.0011303754,0.00015298906,9.306129e-7,0.0000063671573,0.006707314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971689,0.0020549246,0.00053217093,0.00017404393,0.000021948425,0.0000050012936,7.582556e-8,0.0000069046955,0.000036054913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900067,0.00021937831,0.0003660947,0.00009269687,0.00016485555,0.000156294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986427,0.0004768171,0.000522256,0.0001418716,0.00014697608,0.00006941107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047705838,0.000080010665,0.00020702589,0.0001062472,0.00024812983,0.000012955026,0.00013037297,0.00007103356,0.00008374047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001589624,0.000050584353,0.000075942786,0.00007490155,0.00073156884,0.00010940193,0.000014236251,0.00017918121,0.000030060657],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025786788,0.00085585937,0.8596111,0.000007956427,0.0005913531,0.000070344344,0.02456597,0.0000013753325,0.019044932,0.024995182,0.00965193,0.058025308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012615612,0.0017012364,0.98648626,0.0000909487,0.00007088826,0.000040407176,0.0014181036,1.7265066e-7,0.0030581965,0.0015798615,0.00418964,0.00010270101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015198642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007251516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12687518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059966518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049464994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2695496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076389556","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10","title":"The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2608,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Discriminant validity; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Extant taxon; Social psychology; Internal consistency; Convergent validity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Predictive validity; Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); External validity; Marketing; Developmental psychology; Business; Psychometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05960238984683582,"score_gpt":0.32141644977097195,"score_spread":0.26181405992413614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076389556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98212016,0.0016840184,0.00018563664,0.012224906,0.0019161898,0.00021112732,0.0000041316184,0.000017413488,0.0016363964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728554,0.00034967493,0.00009161345,0.0014894644,0.00031802323,0.000009665756,0.0000027640467,0.000014949342,0.000438311],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831545,0.000067959074,0.00072407327,0.0001651656,0.00048444865,0.00024290377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981146,0.00019750727,0.00081083877,0.00034755043,0.0004985874,0.000030951654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001156526,0.00015989302,0.00025007545,0.00031513517,0.00034610316,0.00018822122,0.00060319825,0.00007265403,0.0004559794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001358719,0.000099013516,0.00018103879,0.00026878994,0.00026647045,0.00046543422,0.000073814605,0.00028443575,0.00022660388],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046509915,0.00028648417,0.31299824,0.000028950513,0.0003161483,0.000003990755,0.00022855586,0.000012527494,0.003375217,0.0017342431,0.041018337,0.6395322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011478522,0.000009135128,0.5642921,0.000047611382,0.00014771122,0.000044337896,0.00021897876,0.000018965238,0.00025257675,0.00020581487,0.43349868,0.00011626173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025568914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010692069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.639416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025197845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043964665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49926546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077209349","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.04.005","title":"Asymmetric consequences of radical innovations on category representations of competing brands","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Core (optical fiber); Competition (biology); Preference; Business; Perception; Psychology; Marketing; Cognition; Advertising; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09561286280030337,"score_gpt":0.36214116147901665,"score_spread":0.2665282986787133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077209349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98579586,0.0007494098,0.0007021238,0.0023651216,0.0014378697,0.00014447434,0.000005106147,0.000016266973,0.008783763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988528,0.00008552555,0.00036369142,0.0004798851,0.00013776556,0.0000042235315,0.000010486758,0.0000100351035,0.000055614164],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818194,0.000067697976,0.0010975981,0.0001494232,0.0003708914,0.00013247904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966631,0.00019433552,0.0015020915,0.00024473816,0.0013669993,0.000028719884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010135892,0.000111477515,0.00035106693,0.001337484,0.00006028402,0.00003850116,0.00028749212,0.00008609619,0.00018802626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007485731,0.00010072482,0.00011807807,0.0011328445,0.00047941838,0.00037863743,0.000029791232,0.00022913977,0.00004907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009638416,0.0014699149,0.6848243,0.00014742771,0.00033621304,0.000032152406,0.00033016157,0.000059974114,0.038679298,0.04469999,0.052067474,0.17638928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072922376,0.000119214455,0.8906818,0.00019373356,0.000510252,0.00020632826,0.0011363847,0.00007645024,0.0029678515,0.009443104,0.08700298,0.00036964603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000087935114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010046243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20585755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016059581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012090831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4107439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081489660","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.003","title":"The flip side of vanity sizing: How consumers respond to and compensate for larger than expected clothing sizes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Sizing; Consumption (sociology); Marketing; Advertising; Business; Work (physics); Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.04288231235800721,"score_gpt":0.3050404051013811,"score_spread":0.26215809274337387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081489660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868376,0.0011309292,0.00043181764,0.0096037565,0.0012117657,0.00050310633,0.0000042278293,0.00002130789,0.00025546228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764395,0.00018364913,0.0005403255,0.0011118958,0.00013721744,0.00003443349,0.0000030201265,0.000022322283,0.0003231661],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856836,0.00007534775,0.00064664125,0.00021408542,0.00022098195,0.00027456696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972852,0.0005536212,0.0008503289,0.00028706936,0.0009768561,0.000046910725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091834,0.00017205639,0.00035870765,0.00035559307,0.0002889713,0.00036036703,0.0003268339,0.0000924836,0.00011251338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00061455206,0.00012799236,0.00013998862,0.00024173807,0.00024098993,0.00060579507,0.00006395149,0.00020807519,0.000047244375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002016502,0.00035506912,0.22648282,0.00016248315,0.00054837303,0.000012396713,0.0007190411,0.0000019631532,0.27060887,0.0035498508,0.052902654,0.44263995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022197468,0.000033153377,0.7757991,0.00006713837,0.00021305005,0.000045040662,0.0009183797,0.00004742795,0.00052663207,0.0013780401,0.2185233,0.00022901483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007694864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010790418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5493162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013435278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031409392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52193767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082345242","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.03.007","title":"Social identity threat and consumer preferences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Social identity theory; Feeling; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Threatened species; Social identity approach; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Social group; Business; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07093394578664439,"score_gpt":0.44565681739673063,"score_spread":0.3747228716100862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082345242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90727043,0.00389059,0.00024599987,0.01787063,0.0018776363,0.00010900323,0.0000022788458,0.00002575861,0.06870765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99275964,0.0028051296,0.00019425312,0.003267825,0.00065373734,0.0000012388068,3.9256142e-7,0.000005615073,0.0003121896],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830073,0.00043121589,0.00046770906,0.00018003132,0.00029271113,0.0003275769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895424,0.00013658783,0.00040046166,0.00009018324,0.00026734744,0.0001512045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009076,0.00012356752,0.00037302246,0.0001591086,0.00036419678,0.00006751214,0.0003540757,0.0002649944,0.0004689368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001840163,0.00010732473,0.00013063448,0.00020808504,0.0009422805,0.0004685043,0.000016681353,0.0003589498,0.000042518775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007264566,0.0007239511,0.16924858,0.0000095692385,0.00042885685,0.00012004169,0.029860072,5.9305155e-8,0.0028516713,0.1548523,0.19982724,0.4413512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015436712,0.0004909631,0.4982348,0.00002004376,0.00009830574,0.000148199,0.0020042448,1.8700592e-7,0.000018079481,0.20381038,0.29340804,0.00022307085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009101524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027324783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44112813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029554922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009440859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51345295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085016700","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1101_1","title":"Low‐Involvement Learning: Repetition and Coherence in Familiarity and Belief","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Repetition (rhetorical device); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Feature (linguistics); Linguistics","score_opus":0.0359178917854726,"score_gpt":0.36591307208319573,"score_spread":0.3299951802977231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085016700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9777306,0.00053213205,0.00015103049,0.0026012163,0.00018037253,0.00005873988,2.826901e-7,0.0000047236895,0.018740952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99094164,0.0076707588,0.00013009917,0.00093118974,0.000037671976,2.714375e-7,2.978885e-7,0.0000018000353,0.00028625215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922407,0.00016444351,0.00027181703,0.000060690272,0.00014784465,0.00013111465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949735,0.00006717597,0.00019791372,0.000043428885,0.000085798296,0.00010833557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010746104,0.000045444467,0.00011790531,0.0001186734,0.00009268889,0.000031832875,0.000056704157,0.00007114741,0.00019003447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000266424,0.00004083911,0.000015149026,0.00012012345,0.0001925113,0.00024859002,0.0000095249325,0.00020726329,0.0000065984873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002363019,0.00024548787,0.77300984,0.00002127835,0.000033619886,0.000063121704,0.04300657,0.000006794996,0.00090178987,0.004479225,0.0062563242,0.17173968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017538962,0.00029996104,0.7482358,0.00007789757,0.00001081373,0.000153294,0.007230778,0.000027695185,0.000027671575,0.0026544866,0.23941492,0.00011278613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010304741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042113403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23315859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022303073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057528552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20807442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085541946","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_5","title":"Three Rs of Interpersonal Consumer Guilt: Relationship, Reciprocity, Reparation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Psychology; Social connectedness; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal relationship","score_opus":0.08930811266270203,"score_gpt":0.4131567421569822,"score_spread":0.32384862949428017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085541946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96751213,0.0030171112,0.004087094,0.004267775,0.0023761818,0.00020863893,0.000019887035,0.000023107237,0.01848805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874809,0.000093943134,0.0104518635,0.00063334976,0.0002803762,0.000010503819,0.0000061791548,0.000025054936,0.001017825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977391,0.0002179533,0.0012507238,0.0002576092,0.00025411253,0.00028049844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745995,0.0002458161,0.0010244292,0.00064164953,0.00049140427,0.00013677664],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008385246,0.00018621862,0.00045889866,0.0004462466,0.00007785912,0.0000143499965,0.00046614138,0.00030142555,0.0033700976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024339886,0.00016702282,0.00026655063,0.00026563357,0.00034140266,0.00022254018,0.000047421872,0.0006034796,0.0003566053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011353996,0.0013094308,0.6086412,0.000015272,0.00045972507,0.00007204289,0.0021652693,0.000007949888,0.0040200707,0.014356378,0.22208305,0.14573422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037555813,0.00081270526,0.8088351,0.00008327941,0.00033410598,0.002091437,0.00029157122,0.000012523737,0.00022809234,0.003762717,0.1795028,0.00029010425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001888764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012811803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2001939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005317548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008734174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99754095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086279032","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.08.005","title":"The role of computational ease on the decision to spend loyalty program points","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty program; Loyalty; Point (geometry); Cash; Marketing; Function (biology); Point of sale; Currency; Advertising; Computer science; Microeconomics; Business; Loyalty business model; Economics; Finance; Mathematics; Monetary economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.10265426817800227,"score_gpt":0.473280398755049,"score_spread":0.37062613057704674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086279032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988889,0.00009214947,0.0005688394,0.0060069654,0.0022644384,0.00018951733,0.000009312323,0.0000052102923,0.0019745852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99101865,0.000012494474,0.0077271094,0.0010786887,0.00010334554,0.0000034754169,2.5328097e-7,0.000009120127,0.00004685538],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971873,0.00023020267,0.0012458024,0.0002385885,0.0008899202,0.0002081757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907126,0.006721218,0.00094849226,0.0006503565,0.0007921628,0.0001751892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053179087,0.0001246185,0.00031841348,0.0002705757,0.00019574647,0.00018736301,0.0014382093,0.00010148236,0.0005648106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042056036,0.000057441062,0.00022411734,0.00033971024,0.00031830842,0.00010271962,0.00009336729,0.00054749084,0.00058803987],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047322686,0.0002560983,0.007639124,1.2552252e-7,0.000016929527,0.00000986137,0.000076322256,0.000081115206,0.00025969054,0.0015492894,0.021222265,0.968416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053983927,0.0005541055,0.06769707,0.00001821016,0.0000157311,0.00025767583,0.0001666378,0.00019793611,0.00015961428,0.5430445,0.3872624,0.00008624199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000030014694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000040103303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9683297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001278727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011623814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75582594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088575717","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.003","title":"Building a science of spending: Lessons from the past and directions for the future","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Experiential learning; Yield (engineering); Consumption (sociology); Marketing; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Social psychology; Business; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.04460526341083141,"score_gpt":0.34769701349517734,"score_spread":0.3030917500843459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088575717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668012,0.002479727,0.0046848357,0.022136768,0.0034336967,0.00018357478,0.0000047177978,0.0000107656815,0.00026470984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976792,0.00034088644,0.0004150563,0.00055377156,0.00097429054,0.000007392689,7.538142e-7,0.000007125424,0.000021524831],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992234,0.000021996731,0.0003291264,0.00013714902,0.00016286202,0.00012542927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856424,0.0003582201,0.0005223125,0.00022634656,0.00031606422,0.000012836775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010698221,0.00007853804,0.00014804701,0.00017675075,0.00040953353,0.0001652946,0.00038893352,0.000038179318,0.000061079474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017226262,0.00004581091,0.0000813612,0.00028920462,0.00044014282,0.00033295652,0.000046864672,0.0001509708,0.000006345848],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120592085,0.00008352286,0.1298192,0.000016624772,0.00007979705,4.4908685e-7,0.000093943716,0.0000016898535,0.023073655,0.02965372,0.00911994,0.80793685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053912564,0.0000046996656,0.6521294,0.000019384286,0.00019512347,0.000017705888,0.00015105582,0.000086094864,0.00005978069,0.003198332,0.34354615,0.0000531287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038910086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004751832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80788374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000068780882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019248446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31498423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088611686","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.03.005","title":"“I'd like to be that attractive, but at least I'm smart”: How exposure to ideal advertising models motivates improved decision‐making","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Compensation (psychology); Coping (psychology); Ideal (ethics); Social psychology; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Cognitive psychology; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09091548944613807,"score_gpt":0.40432082313193574,"score_spread":0.31340533368579765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088611686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9304229,0.0010672213,0.05289784,0.007528081,0.0057244394,0.00041206827,0.000032767755,0.000038833365,0.0018758622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981106,0.000028336506,0.007224539,0.009789268,0.00026098173,0.00003469407,0.0000028891886,0.00006460067,0.0014887202],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996648,0.00049124076,0.0010660009,0.0005679787,0.00037280328,0.00085394067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968532,0.0005095493,0.0007638971,0.00066541246,0.00047273998,0.00073521025],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010057864,0.00035989896,0.0007626099,0.0006641486,0.0002947953,0.000072382696,0.0006095115,0.00038093116,0.0010197099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002059754,0.00032128987,0.00041301968,0.00030949342,0.00011224184,0.00039127513,0.00013708013,0.00079119304,0.00024829185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008109242,0.0013243435,0.08111069,0.00003266016,0.0004306339,0.00018287954,0.003926897,0.00017238213,0.014695607,0.0006901333,0.17437956,0.71494496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070953704,0.0069634025,0.7655276,0.0007728811,0.0002836436,0.002914169,0.0012190841,0.00013550004,0.00038899534,0.0017969578,0.21192162,0.0009807857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005515163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022151513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71396416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015609404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006173437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089898254","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.03.003","title":"Contrasting rule‐based and similarity‐based category learning: The effects of mood and prior knowledge on ambiguous categorization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Product (mathematics); Feature (linguistics); Product category; Mood; Concept learning; Cognitive psychology; Phenomenon; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.026658086190679872,"score_gpt":0.30167814781957464,"score_spread":0.27502006162889475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089898254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856138,0.0029587222,0.0013838632,0.0005028881,0.0009364044,0.00022348276,0.0000011505279,0.00002025919,0.008359386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998918,0.00007976168,0.0003271387,0.00047990092,0.00007068041,0.0000057174184,0.0000014856537,0.000023669534,0.00009367446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832594,0.0005502786,0.0005100797,0.00024402789,0.00012681943,0.00024283234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825066,0.0006920966,0.0006157133,0.00016284885,0.00017287674,0.00010581976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070865295,0.00018727392,0.0003966576,0.00022125352,0.00014060315,0.00001526466,0.00015411935,0.00016429595,0.00010460208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038519767,0.00013369392,0.000073415424,0.00012961452,0.0002907257,0.000038367536,0.000020301182,0.0006493305,0.000011039978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048360066,0.0028235943,0.6099794,0.00046270675,0.0010774938,0.00024088229,0.018537946,0.00001845797,0.01818509,0.005449247,0.0018658423,0.33652332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004272524,0.0017311343,0.9889686,0.00012683064,0.00014417418,0.00014882704,0.00015839508,0.000050714218,0.0011345728,0.0002771552,0.0028270755,0.00015999966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020100046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000056964163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3789892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014663573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000883255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54518795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090492799","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.03.004","title":"Evidence for two facets of pride in consumption: Findings from luxury brands","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pride; Feeling; Consumption (sociology); Narcissism; Psychology; Social psychology; Advertising; Aesthetics; Business; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.16964559068381432,"score_gpt":0.4620356338567443,"score_spread":0.29239004317292994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090492799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866897,0.0030077514,0.0061039114,0.0011491361,0.0022759384,0.00023116297,0.000024328032,0.000008729539,0.00050935877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99582,0.0002202657,0.002921005,0.0006013269,0.00014590818,0.000018691439,0.0000035848043,0.000019308227,0.00024993956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980353,0.00027338573,0.000993197,0.0002574952,0.00015529577,0.0002852972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778736,0.0009410152,0.00057714875,0.00036242374,0.00022605147,0.000106026586],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010560085,0.00015743276,0.0005562355,0.00035931403,0.000035384524,0.0000116283745,0.0003400801,0.00019170207,0.0015342676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025711444,0.00014203518,0.00019876633,0.00013884794,0.000220583,0.00014837531,0.00002231282,0.0003508292,0.000076533535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017370938,0.00055153284,0.9021288,0.000029341827,0.00016083044,0.00003534915,0.0009487872,0.000005401613,0.0334023,0.0024670232,0.01833155,0.04020195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008060141,0.0006746695,0.97381693,0.00031253137,0.00015872545,0.00028126736,0.00006384833,0.000007615716,0.0010351626,0.0015010791,0.013906254,0.00018175757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052694926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005942862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07168811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026609503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044165896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092942349","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.008","title":"Dual process theory and the context of choice: Comments on Dhar and Gorlin","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Heuristics; Normative; Psychology; Dual (grammatical number); Variety (cybernetics); Differential (mechanical device); Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Differential effects; Cognitive psychology; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Social psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09028027782625299,"score_gpt":0.4553739622883071,"score_spread":0.36509368446205415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092942349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99264437,0.00087534403,0.000063690204,0.0046916986,0.0005965812,0.00013260153,0.0000053158633,0.0000021521175,0.0009882456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963977,0.00017676945,0.00007945204,0.0031866236,0.000046622932,0.0000028654256,1.2168915e-7,0.0000063550556,0.00010352178],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979022,0.0005028349,0.0009354666,0.00018809953,0.0003367505,0.00013461564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325484,0.0050173686,0.00094079453,0.00028768528,0.00040225658,0.00009704382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042746575,0.000109820954,0.00047526817,0.00020559767,0.00007690061,0.000105092164,0.00040527072,0.000088210145,0.000425551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018207558,0.00005573827,0.00008250344,0.0001147626,0.00075993314,0.00020626972,0.000053963155,0.00027779565,0.000069734124],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011297079,0.00018412019,0.04075551,0.0000026761777,0.000067216366,0.00000831891,0.0009971452,0.0000015579776,0.00019718826,0.0018151545,0.023360532,0.9314809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014557807,0.0012328133,0.25825033,0.0001306703,0.00014490866,0.00094143004,0.0058591575,0.000083931925,0.00029884474,0.6591561,0.059035733,0.00030832257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008562821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000051542097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93117255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006426524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031470758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46594852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151058362","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.013","title":"Perceiving images and telling tales: A visual and verbal analysis of the meaning of the internet","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphor; Visual rhetoric; Psychology; Perception; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Abstraction; Cognitive psychology; Rhetoric; Construct (python library); Narrative; The Internet; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.017110297910438627,"score_gpt":0.3330713411340374,"score_spread":0.3159610432235988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151058362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924557,0.003721022,0.0006930558,0.0003099405,0.000394771,0.000059159185,0.0000048126085,0.0000028277339,0.0023587144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99899596,0.00020907538,0.00012889277,0.00051098317,0.00004982993,5.4540874e-7,3.767042e-7,0.0000061435685,0.00009817929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872565,0.0003323043,0.00050623744,0.00014333994,0.00015427281,0.0001381723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884534,0.00018250491,0.00062377047,0.00018578346,0.00012386682,0.000038728907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051595725,0.00010579302,0.000386582,0.00022774209,0.000042562926,0.000013673415,0.00020353857,0.00009451997,0.0001648176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008397657,0.000060567505,0.00020897729,0.00032883586,0.00030290562,0.00006164749,0.000030112054,0.00027920713,9.057625e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00125673,0.0009339358,0.54970515,0.000057785957,0.007723014,0.00007478847,0.08791076,0.000018053466,0.14457224,0.0024352777,0.0020313049,0.20328096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010665826,0.00028906582,0.9901706,0.000096896314,0.0019111019,0.00050380314,0.0032392538,0.000059837395,0.0013608835,0.00095639756,0.00024885987,0.000096742355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028092845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021196342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44046542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000069163493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014943029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24698712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157258311","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2012.02.002","title":"Self‐regulatory strength amplification through selective information processing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Self-control; Psychology; Consumption (sociology); Control (management); Regulatory focus theory; Focus (optics); Information processing; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06070291748348211,"score_gpt":0.4284846270278583,"score_spread":0.36778170954437617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157258311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94927174,0.0073859063,0.009364806,0.0009172041,0.0052221343,0.00032238854,0.000013229929,0.000074629344,0.02742794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949966,0.00008056185,0.003446832,0.0010490713,0.00029991497,0.00001771101,0.000008034193,0.000012615948,0.00008866863],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825877,0.00021777973,0.00086890755,0.00009428288,0.00017180954,0.00038845112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820995,0.00004632582,0.00094838947,0.0002058367,0.0004226461,0.00016686537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058616704,0.00012928947,0.0002366836,0.000227909,0.00011135997,0.000020249272,0.00017354861,0.0002081712,0.0006185101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031399857,0.0001152125,0.00012594239,0.0002479316,0.00008571041,0.0013679431,0.000010618435,0.00045960458,0.00040090765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006841609,0.0028328507,0.17763583,0.0000814343,0.0002990444,0.0000051237907,0.021160765,6.964065e-7,0.0002710716,0.0161044,0.13289213,0.6480325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014099248,0.00037786702,0.62992954,0.000039715564,0.000114244496,0.00058107625,0.00091070705,0.0000025679537,0.00008782603,0.00035737245,0.36603993,0.0001491943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011395324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017191817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6478833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007974383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009085773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6772252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169090813","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.011","title":"The aesthetics of luxury fashion, body and identify formation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Fashion and Cultural Textiles","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Aesthetics; Identity (music); Perception; Everyday Aesthetics; Focus (optics); Psychology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.026801026035935968,"score_gpt":0.3073534162930194,"score_spread":0.2805523902570834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169090813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985269,0.00031857358,0.000016215721,0.0028414947,0.0015811649,0.00003987342,0.0000022303973,0.000004426801,0.009927011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799764,0.0007443391,0.000033739514,0.0003435676,0.0001307797,6.7481267e-7,5.9031004e-7,0.0000041243507,0.00074451976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993633,0.000045390003,0.00036071902,0.000041483843,0.00010390423,0.00008522312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991977,0.000061784835,0.00034805166,0.00009729427,0.0002578907,0.000037252084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029122134,0.000057937275,0.000120552504,0.000049347578,0.00014787864,0.00006538509,0.00013190092,0.00004403598,0.00034182347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041718697,0.000032071686,0.000057732585,0.00001448439,0.0004119384,0.00017454269,0.000011187273,0.0002384198,0.000018506447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000177138,0.00022890879,0.0025032146,0.00004795228,0.00018435715,0.000017508228,0.04658926,2.6492597e-7,0.043165233,0.6015753,0.17467089,0.13083997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062089495,0.00015997149,0.012431322,0.000015758922,0.000040563355,0.0004623128,0.005288735,0.0000060529032,0.00020193224,0.004667843,0.97602993,0.00007465219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010958336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014604095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80135906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000018791063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010343702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3742727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172834523","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.11.001","title":"Experiencing haptic roughness promotes empathy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Psychology; Haptic technology; Empathic concern; Cognitive psychology; Perspective-taking; Social psychology; Intervention (counseling); Computer science","score_opus":0.20057592594438775,"score_gpt":0.3641322999798513,"score_spread":0.16355637403546355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172834523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843535,0.0007154516,0.001302601,0.00512412,0.003586358,0.0000873059,0.0000018552021,0.0000231708,0.0048056357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935554,0.0000778372,0.0011552648,0.0047644344,0.00024118388,0.0000042793235,2.585673e-7,0.0000134972315,0.00018781077],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982953,0.00024629556,0.000536432,0.00025481108,0.00036421666,0.00030296488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998837,0.00012405928,0.0003875396,0.00021708054,0.0001676024,0.00026673873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055583194,0.0001485364,0.00030480788,0.00019098807,0.00006768449,0.000023840363,0.00042770585,0.000108418775,0.00013420227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050142576,0.00011567905,0.00010972554,0.00018985811,0.00030230958,0.00026350445,0.000039948653,0.00033582936,0.00022633468],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029651644,0.003607815,0.018180652,0.000042877342,0.00019524067,0.003108673,0.020444313,0.000088375185,0.6835431,0.0052660494,0.15670206,0.10585569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.027489757,0.009691439,0.05621098,0.00043185728,0.00028172866,0.07298078,0.005382578,0.0003228589,0.1460341,0.07765614,0.601288,0.0022297474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000023126527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.535108e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53750896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038800277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009414646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47172546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254320434","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.003","title":"Evolutionary consumer psychology: Ask not what you can do for biology, but…","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Nomological network; Evolutionary psychology; Modularity (biology); Perspective (graphical); Empirical evidence; Cognitive science; Multidisciplinary approach; Evolutionary neuroscience; Psychology; Evolutionary ecology; Data science; Epistemology; Computer science; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Evolutionary biology; Social psychology; Sociology; Ecology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0585778271314842,"score_gpt":0.3922713392608622,"score_spread":0.33369351212937803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254320434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8702825,0.04386551,0.0030327719,0.035737596,0.03443697,0.002118878,0.0003397543,0.00018480945,0.010001212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616884,0.0028009068,0.0067314534,0.022089938,0.0012588358,0.0005845741,0.00009574541,0.00015948557,0.004590665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993974,0.0009633862,0.0022034724,0.0011471584,0.00030789655,0.0014041192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944025,0.0008344743,0.0015801495,0.0013942859,0.0012429797,0.00054559717],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013318649,0.00070817163,0.0013032982,0.0011300612,0.00042776746,0.000101129976,0.0013622809,0.001457492,0.014646819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001790522,0.0006492754,0.0007529945,0.00037620272,0.002259292,0.00076505466,0.000090973386,0.0015785783,0.0024659764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002605796,0.0025436066,0.096682526,0.000028733126,0.0017731258,0.00017237644,0.0012712574,0.000002348377,0.009319108,0.01864109,0.7995471,0.06741297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011632212,0.0025213785,0.46995887,0.00010057228,0.0005845079,0.0053992565,0.0012574152,0.000004547444,0.000051249735,0.028465092,0.47903046,0.0009944115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046415378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014825051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37327635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011836568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002068659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265806969","doi":"10.1207/15327660152054003","title":"Low-Involvement Learning: Repetition and Coherence in Familiarity and Belief","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Repetition (rhetorical device); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042371564591633604,"score_gpt":0.3630204773631098,"score_spread":0.32064891277147617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265806969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98202395,0.0048197214,0.00008647109,0.002698654,0.000709056,0.00007481105,8.7151426e-7,0.0000072680623,0.009579173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946599,0.0039752056,0.00023205468,0.0005834036,0.000080850805,0.0000065632444,0.0000015031464,0.0000062216477,0.00045431955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889904,0.00020149426,0.00042812197,0.00018691474,0.00009203764,0.00019239771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992688,0.00018177697,0.0002664556,0.00011524756,0.000094594754,0.00007312889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056319777,0.000100151556,0.00023000152,0.00014087273,0.000051989355,0.00002045745,0.00009407274,0.00012557687,0.00034884852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007168433,0.00008846493,0.000030082929,0.00011413652,0.00023082455,0.000085279135,0.000020965375,0.00038567596,0.000014684318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025307786,0.000271084,0.9806849,0.000014542394,0.00005277151,0.00013635644,0.0008969397,0.0000032071932,0.0004742179,0.0030889837,0.003210586,0.010913365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010713736,0.00045228825,0.9637752,0.00004211679,0.000014338793,0.0011638037,0.0018713803,0.0000027111992,0.000008630662,0.0050005936,0.026505977,0.00009153861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011546504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094194525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023295391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021485524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003359607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38196468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346012354","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2016.04.004","title":"When red means go: Non‐normative effects of red under sensation seeking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Color perception and design","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sensation seeking; Psychology; Normative; Compliance (psychology); Reactance; Social psychology; Arousal; Sensation; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03471439186069055,"score_gpt":0.34759083955593356,"score_spread":0.31287644769524303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346012354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7112349,0.0005639022,0.22246318,0.012912652,0.005877825,0.000534594,0.000009215645,0.000050545248,0.04635318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995605,0.00011785595,0.00122676,0.001350511,0.00017105055,0.000007683358,9.3036454e-7,0.00002452449,0.0014956805],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976453,0.00073603744,0.0008733641,0.00021819699,0.00024046205,0.0002866366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974132,0.0007477478,0.00097376754,0.00036527545,0.0003698595,0.00013010312],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007447068,0.00018084259,0.00049810973,0.0004240511,0.000046291712,0.000009342309,0.00023131844,0.00026075682,0.00283688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014978512,0.00012817032,0.00020528215,0.0001643299,0.00021716332,0.00017034657,0.000020687927,0.00027517552,0.00033134824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029513666,0.00067337794,0.018974483,0.000053833443,0.0010871101,0.00017920176,0.008890912,0.0000036635042,0.62694865,0.0015164914,0.25708923,0.0816317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01747295,0.0023036303,0.89719105,0.0004462864,0.00037988197,0.001655062,0.00095600024,0.000020280377,0.0038064588,0.01474106,0.06051093,0.00051640556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000733376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010675985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87821656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006792197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055468434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99807465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417761538","doi":"10.1207/153276602760078613","title":"Misrepresentation in the Consumer Context","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Lying; Context (archaeology); Consumption (sociology); Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Impression management; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Business; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.09780787559974172,"score_gpt":0.42020981577697847,"score_spread":0.3224019401772368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417761538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76623935,0.0064113094,0.00014578839,0.057485342,0.0037204633,0.00022792017,0.0000017067464,0.000012915414,0.16575518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874765,0.0019791746,0.00004317418,0.009512309,0.000349758,0.0000054452703,2.5987413e-7,0.0000061311457,0.0006272465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778414,0.0010387979,0.00050263584,0.00012580655,0.00027681648,0.00027178347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876,0.0005160962,0.00033090467,0.00015601271,0.00016848788,0.00006851128],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012345357,0.000084754916,0.00022841126,0.000168848,0.00013846015,0.00003410869,0.0004812035,0.00015739932,0.0021905138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003920117,0.00006131792,0.00012410517,0.00030809583,0.00064846163,0.00017089938,0.000008384634,0.0003865735,0.0002269351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015929861,0.00071267085,0.16508447,0.0000032927733,0.00012092636,0.00019015888,0.07041675,4.2593268e-7,0.00046298667,0.014089529,0.59741133,0.15134816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001512415,0.00016754123,0.06630404,0.000014223812,0.000026579295,0.00018307638,0.010639798,0.0000020660364,0.0000065332692,0.005736979,0.9153035,0.00010323182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002825683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082526624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31789216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030952455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028612489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512303288","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2016.08.008","title":"The warmth of our regrets: Managing regret through physiological regulation and consumption","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Embodied cognition; Psychology; Feeling; Action (physics); Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Cognition; Cognitive dissonance; Arousal; Cognitive psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12659868714688177,"score_gpt":0.37165199588394504,"score_spread":0.24505330873706327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512303288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96633905,0.00423985,0.0002732026,0.024266928,0.0017275722,0.000131706,0.000006496751,0.00001137669,0.0030038047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98859066,0.00954905,0.00012771327,0.000907153,0.0004085421,0.000002071458,4.2507597e-7,0.000006141694,0.0004082442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894094,0.00015154528,0.0005034743,0.00010237461,0.0001377782,0.0001638798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880016,0.0002035589,0.00060347875,0.00015704015,0.00018976249,0.000045998728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005409925,0.00008400307,0.00023360424,0.000057320558,0.00016399426,0.000019356099,0.0001277736,0.000057985377,0.00019331505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000882431,0.00003842054,0.000057705038,0.000016516791,0.0004942754,0.0002115936,0.000015443007,0.00014297696,0.000021896614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001635398,0.00019422105,0.024546232,0.00016302032,0.00038529444,0.00003517412,0.019087164,0.0000012387482,0.013158678,0.5179517,0.18284507,0.23999676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00329402,0.0011084658,0.101396464,0.0005362108,0.00011866047,0.00031345442,0.002750213,0.000008638457,0.00025277675,0.16432676,0.72564757,0.00024676987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000073495494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025230878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5428025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012624862,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027317681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21166644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528396400","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2016.09.005","title":"How inferred contagion biases dispositional judgments of others","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Object (grammar); Psychology; Social psychology; Emotional contagion; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.15679362857812448,"score_gpt":0.3428869711293628,"score_spread":0.1860933425512383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528396400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96925056,0.00021571225,0.0017559875,0.025694711,0.0016196243,0.00008366854,0.000037691567,0.000009412071,0.001332606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99555486,0.0004044047,0.000231731,0.0031191257,0.00010830813,0.0000024888539,6.490457e-7,0.000010145083,0.00056826376],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858403,0.00020291717,0.0004637802,0.00020584006,0.0003275415,0.00021591705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854624,0.00043405278,0.0006069001,0.00016989547,0.00012641298,0.00011652509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023471405,0.00013012749,0.00029555956,0.00022668306,0.000043972545,0.000011259321,0.00030123795,0.000096713185,0.00028556678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035600452,0.00008076728,0.00016209656,0.000109045744,0.000494064,0.00025774262,0.000023732913,0.00013418689,0.000041503947],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085843646,0.0005218978,0.017310446,0.0000056413364,0.000070028414,0.00007785964,0.0000414866,0.0000013295569,0.943952,0.0020789797,0.016012484,0.0190694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019133382,0.0035215197,0.46236843,0.00078616827,0.0001710525,0.00510209,0.00007414805,0.0000058158016,0.35924795,0.024891583,0.124034904,0.00066296506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012710424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010293969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58470404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027800195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040471456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32935938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529428667","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1035","title":"A Self‐Regulatory Model of Resource Scarcity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Resource scarcity; Resource (disambiguation); Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Commodity; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Natural resource economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09276690302536922,"score_gpt":0.4348259738531893,"score_spread":0.34205907082782006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529428667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9707401,0.0016309199,0.001649434,0.00070291635,0.00166352,0.00011653941,0.00001630601,0.000020958572,0.02345935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99449426,0.000032295502,0.0032312826,0.001135261,0.00026002366,0.0000043402392,8.514699e-7,0.000020289563,0.0008213895],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798256,0.00028908168,0.0010091395,0.00018811207,0.00019729811,0.00033382385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979991,0.00006036374,0.00079146953,0.00046134865,0.00047053394,0.00021718584],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008171285,0.00013231991,0.00040512191,0.00032744795,0.00006700952,0.000005086646,0.0003733512,0.00023975797,0.0016260465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028010403,0.000117840755,0.00027528487,0.00018234288,0.00046897077,0.00008527259,0.000030268871,0.00042010765,0.00016630303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004092687,0.005447099,0.11208192,0.00009781147,0.00087339926,0.00009039268,0.0066783577,0.000007096043,0.0070470124,0.019316327,0.6911877,0.15308021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009656623,0.006878199,0.56704724,0.00026021615,0.0005853848,0.0021953678,0.00059114036,0.00033492674,0.0011478706,0.0052187704,0.4054879,0.00059638143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000137158795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012252225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45496532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029781328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001102494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582271348","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.01.003","title":"How goal progress influences regulatory focus in goal pursuit","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"University of Winnipeg","keywords":"Goal pursuit; Regulatory focus theory; Goal orientation; Goal setting; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Focus (optics); Point (geometry); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.07461512724015618,"score_gpt":0.45112661405161825,"score_spread":0.37651148681146207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582271348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9693636,0.0084673865,0.00003263359,0.012652712,0.005252592,0.0002086803,0.000010020052,0.0000139105105,0.0039985194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997452,0.000100005964,0.00028309107,0.0004340365,0.00032268252,0.000028414028,8.3330355e-7,0.00002095882,0.0013579356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777895,0.00029261314,0.0008356674,0.00027930914,0.0002688531,0.0005446269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99738497,0.00005350101,0.0013124156,0.00075969327,0.00023054132,0.0002588937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093697064,0.00019088293,0.00048837304,0.00037764883,0.00019726511,0.0001494208,0.0010520491,0.000333692,0.0006184174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009992997,0.00016420949,0.00024648925,0.000090180125,0.0007915138,0.000466954,0.000060172308,0.00081150234,0.0001178365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052028336,0.00057549914,0.67052925,0.000009464442,0.000080168305,0.00042361688,0.00028196195,6.545691e-8,0.00026568343,0.001377194,0.024332784,0.30160403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026664056,0.0007539319,0.9254469,0.000101623096,0.000042521333,0.0007031434,0.00014102868,3.784935e-7,0.000030757335,0.0011703282,0.068797424,0.00014551841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090763155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028853287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3014585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004749811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010479912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6771237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583012190","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.01.002","title":"Just do it! Why committed consumers react negatively to assertive ads","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Assertiveness; Reactance; Feeling; Advertising; Compliance (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.10317029434847172,"score_gpt":0.3853365607307693,"score_spread":0.2821662663822976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583012190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95585614,0.0003616151,0.0004992118,0.026004678,0.004285256,0.00035980946,0.000008673076,0.000046339755,0.012578275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893421,0.00015484433,0.00027046134,0.00936612,0.0003517583,0.000016120972,0.00000614944,0.000033743367,0.00045868667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979226,0.0000686966,0.00090371986,0.00035468247,0.00038688187,0.00036342227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605924,0.000110053785,0.0017715472,0.0008150043,0.0011599013,0.00008428416],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009150672,0.0002753893,0.0005124377,0.00067740463,0.00058377016,0.0008145516,0.001055391,0.00016821422,0.001295413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007021475,0.00025448794,0.00023276145,0.00023055269,0.00035540242,0.0015160923,0.00014549572,0.00048089132,0.0012111107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010320988,0.00052313914,0.35225496,0.000048288188,0.00036040612,0.000113767994,0.00027166514,0.0000010951534,0.013115395,0.0014342649,0.35248315,0.2783618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016167621,0.000017656588,0.56704575,0.0000794627,0.00022054788,0.00005470101,0.00023066427,0.0000058912633,0.0000891403,0.000368606,0.43004772,0.00022314095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000191444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018343117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27813864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041744333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006546094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593050311","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1017","title":"When Seeking the Best Brings Out the Worst in Consumers: Understanding the Relationship between a Maximizing Mindset and Immoral Behavior","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Scarcity; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Psychology; Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Marketing; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.37545247559499884,"score_gpt":0.47851258982934536,"score_spread":0.10306011423434652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593050311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659546,0.0027781122,0.0006463864,0.02612795,0.0020569924,0.00041857216,0.000017738379,0.000007451515,0.0019922105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985037,0.000048864644,0.00009745131,0.0006954522,0.00018459963,0.00003410034,0.0000017003732,0.000023538647,0.00041059052],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975108,0.0006406703,0.0009288415,0.00023814329,0.00020763579,0.0004739279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966269,0.0012367199,0.0011744435,0.0007523492,0.000084386156,0.00012517934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023737038,0.00019400472,0.00035527183,0.00019887542,0.001230925,0.00022637361,0.0009116411,0.00021383849,0.0001962882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029214873,0.0001086155,0.00018679994,0.0000893453,0.0011573243,0.00025758383,0.00010546921,0.0015278026,0.000057290432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011443304,0.00009069151,0.97893995,0.000005017705,0.000057609985,0.000051258394,0.00413735,8.109961e-8,0.000011921421,0.0018873126,0.0029475724,0.011756814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015729074,0.00017426584,0.98308206,0.00014405136,0.00028174254,0.00056744163,0.005388526,0.000001479224,0.0000010249613,0.0034030194,0.0052627837,0.000120681776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038907252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010791478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032549117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087481036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006288865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94674045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593606402","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.03.001","title":"The satiating effect of pricing: The influence of price on enjoyment over time","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0704521657958546,"score_gpt":0.4577020623484072,"score_spread":0.3872498965525526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593606402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955401,0.00016776557,0.00005317253,0.0013320118,0.00070744986,0.00011305797,0.000002601431,0.0000017009486,0.0020821549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943197,0.00006358413,0.00012696133,0.00022636834,0.00004539581,0.0000011877406,3.120608e-8,0.000006230802,0.00009826942],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727625,0.00045630708,0.0012541002,0.00017288471,0.00066943915,0.0001710291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871761,0.0074396664,0.0038611065,0.0010925285,0.00037624507,0.00005430923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008780281,0.000116189425,0.0004626946,0.00013772592,0.00031014366,0.00013423685,0.0018832829,0.00007812558,0.00008415556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007103926,0.000049645834,0.00021087739,0.000106226915,0.0004777315,0.00017781339,0.00012813607,0.00030772344,0.00007270227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010899907,0.00014333206,0.1916847,0.000004286639,0.00011961282,0.000017686376,0.00052129565,0.00056068983,0.01345866,0.00022213804,0.008322305,0.7838553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014038463,0.0014853508,0.96493953,0.00013723898,0.00007078712,0.00011912293,0.00004268884,0.00010999357,0.002447785,0.008918395,0.020215955,0.000109327666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009560369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026595817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.783746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002090097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006373529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8504576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599481218","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.03.003","title":"Does Red Bull give wings to vodka? Placebo effects of marketing labels on perceived intoxication and risky attitudes and behaviors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Psychology; Placebo; Alcohol intoxication; Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Overconsumption; Injury prevention; Poison control; Environmental health; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.03151448657634963,"score_gpt":0.4211319049245308,"score_spread":0.38961741834818114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599481218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99373883,0.00071287254,0.000032034426,0.0029070068,0.0016205575,0.00031331778,0.000010031102,0.000008010182,0.0006573472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99811894,0.0003114029,0.00060293294,0.00041945628,0.00008042584,0.000019902667,9.1083814e-7,0.000016955224,0.0004291041],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982957,0.00045779298,0.00060739234,0.00026203433,0.00012753157,0.0002495103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979117,0.0004130154,0.0008632971,0.00038776177,0.00019180901,0.00023241194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010775831,0.00015487851,0.0004037731,0.00025205372,0.00020571498,0.000035473666,0.0002483956,0.00019184845,0.00022066323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046554115,0.00011132154,0.00008929649,0.000042869848,0.00028664884,0.00012580905,0.000048488986,0.00038672978,0.00001674968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051157577,0.0008489614,0.77349395,0.00015838246,0.00017717718,0.00008358091,0.002729045,8.295572e-8,0.026405513,0.00010985126,0.009030156,0.18184753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00250945,0.0013557714,0.992643,0.0004596271,0.000119600394,0.000108517655,0.00011639665,3.1721535e-7,0.00034091724,0.00006685798,0.00216613,0.00011341031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000114470306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000063727966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21914904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022364791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020453344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45395607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605701288","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.03.005","title":"Refining the tightness and looseness framework with a consumer lens","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Consumer behaviour; Context (archaeology); Punishment (psychology); Through-the-lens metering; Perspective (graphical); Perception; Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Process (computing); Marketing; Social psychology; Lens (geology); Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Business; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.06080179629162039,"score_gpt":0.3298166830693209,"score_spread":0.26901488677770047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605701288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98432004,0.0017550843,0.0009245212,0.008724641,0.0017584271,0.00011402838,0.0000016409807,0.00002345711,0.0023781299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99673676,0.00037639734,0.00034430294,0.0019205799,0.00035564147,0.000009463311,0.0000012986704,0.00002232445,0.00023321323],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880904,0.000036810576,0.0004577422,0.00022595355,0.00024670624,0.00022376359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975252,0.00012989312,0.0012079383,0.0006587788,0.00045465992,0.000023497489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006751905,0.00017778034,0.0003054397,0.00020660674,0.00074303563,0.0006971153,0.00057318294,0.0001201535,0.00024100367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022205603,0.00011216318,0.00007740401,0.00010479627,0.00068579376,0.0010145908,0.000091281065,0.00043986633,0.00010653119],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049759884,0.0001221125,0.6910319,0.000047261023,0.00018750207,0.00007362393,0.000092046736,8.0446074e-7,0.00082944834,0.0072308285,0.004719476,0.2951674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013464395,0.000009997463,0.7465923,0.00012387992,0.00027261506,0.00028612206,0.000069437956,0.000008851731,0.00001825838,0.0013862414,0.24971898,0.00016687141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059926348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000099621095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29500052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008369207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038484974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6722299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606035110","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.04.002","title":"“Our” brand's failure leads to “their” product derogation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Derogation; Social identity theory; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Identity (music); Advertising; Self-affirmation; Group (periodic table); Social group; Business","score_opus":0.0702976365965633,"score_gpt":0.43652697408850943,"score_spread":0.36622933749194614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606035110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8259074,0.00042202437,0.0005908967,0.13857812,0.0073305382,0.00020880719,0.000002883597,0.000022307056,0.026936999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993537,0.00023010738,0.0006125556,0.0027786295,0.0018285657,0.00000483288,4.5212775e-7,0.000012906649,0.0009949346],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842346,0.0003208177,0.0004364922,0.00021749856,0.0002439369,0.00035778715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982369,0.00005918551,0.0006509449,0.00038546615,0.000447183,0.00022033685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012018176,0.00012537284,0.00033549848,0.000167509,0.0007203453,0.00012987155,0.0008761395,0.0001811933,0.00025759774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009582424,0.00010544753,0.00016149197,0.00010690184,0.0003503597,0.00038104824,0.00003711312,0.00034045664,0.00023055589],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006229144,0.00037604527,0.18395728,0.00000860149,0.0002652393,0.00007507413,0.020291189,0.0000010172383,0.020272253,0.0059008426,0.5502061,0.21802343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011227076,0.0002915793,0.16630253,0.00003493124,0.000033764452,0.00010081753,0.0017554191,1.5482247e-7,0.0003420869,0.0048119416,0.82503015,0.00017393134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011396121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012108334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27482402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004694833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012684212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55403864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765812327","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1047","title":"The Loss of Loss Aversion: Will It Loom Larger Than Its Gain?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Persistence (discontinuity); Balance (ability); Positive economics; Inequity aversion; Psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08635360840923917,"score_gpt":0.3426659880921798,"score_spread":0.2563123796829406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765812327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397937,0.0007662237,0.00030513498,0.04496057,0.0051578498,0.000117429794,0.000013907689,0.0000106165835,0.00887457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98831415,0.0013600321,0.0000976431,0.008460641,0.00042842815,0.0000014303688,3.0763792e-7,0.000012509281,0.0013248771],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979199,0.00034364007,0.00066061475,0.0002657192,0.00043110695,0.0003789824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810576,0.00042132637,0.00065792876,0.00034086517,0.00032699472,0.00014710875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008198961,0.00016149288,0.00030877563,0.00013957803,0.00023889005,0.000017841434,0.00075997005,0.00014348651,0.0006700665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030789338,0.000101953665,0.0001965182,0.00022311657,0.0013306525,0.00019912426,0.00006911137,0.0003964044,0.0004272278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005796478,0.0022022973,0.049164496,0.000043847773,0.0004353113,0.0012665717,0.0013434793,0.000012298467,0.26066962,0.012637826,0.648352,0.018075742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040498385,0.0019011252,0.0518963,0.000118274045,0.00008512234,0.005945692,0.00011470196,0.000021201242,0.045674495,0.009049279,0.8808284,0.0003156029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012935237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000041574995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23247632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002050565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006189207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73367584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782116190","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1002","title":"Lie, Cheat, and Steal: How Harmful Brands Motivate Consumers to Act Unethically","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Psychology; Retributive justice; Action (physics); Advertising; Consumer behaviour; Social psychology; Business; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.14625269052483142,"score_gpt":0.3689483724303552,"score_spread":0.2226956819055238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782116190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86421645,0.00025750193,0.00030476195,0.12793438,0.0021432457,0.0001473847,0.0000124016005,0.000017126413,0.00496676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982129,0.0009275118,0.000719032,0.015288254,0.00015039368,0.0000035229048,3.6713925e-7,0.00002000127,0.0007619203],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981035,0.00024558173,0.0004501137,0.00043132764,0.0003463282,0.0004231567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799645,0.0003107881,0.00060713117,0.00048647242,0.0001537376,0.00044544457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071562134,0.00022798346,0.00047549154,0.00023183675,0.00037900655,0.00015354704,0.0007921887,0.00021893512,0.00014128999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010950628,0.00018292923,0.0001312291,0.00007937412,0.0008852735,0.0003172079,0.0001214726,0.00072508503,0.00010491418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035324453,0.0008152561,0.094303496,0.000052988715,0.0002900255,0.0012004814,0.0006351456,0.0000046984983,0.63901544,0.0023801036,0.11267115,0.14509878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057696793,0.001186141,0.722091,0.00012215979,0.00008266565,0.0035110503,0.000034139422,0.0000070118895,0.011995037,0.0041773096,0.25061753,0.00040628546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005579319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000058622963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62778753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021740916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006178647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74596375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782762104","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1023","title":"Discounting Humanity: When Consumers are Price Conscious, Employees Appear Less Human","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Marketing; Humanity; Perception; Business; Service (business); Discounting; Economics; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.05460520579226862,"score_gpt":0.3809652461218973,"score_spread":0.3263600403296287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782762104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90962607,0.0025685078,0.0011022777,0.0019982671,0.0053055948,0.00023671072,0.000015567737,0.00006725304,0.07907978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926256,0.00015433099,0.00037796638,0.0034447205,0.001172169,0.0000068959425,0.0000040357268,0.000058053258,0.0021562416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967927,0.00055623526,0.0011029682,0.00043099374,0.0004124999,0.0007046035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688196,0.00021325538,0.0014412043,0.0005197816,0.000672423,0.00027134828],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012804713,0.00032396827,0.00076085125,0.0003540837,0.0006865366,0.00008151958,0.0007067396,0.00042555365,0.0039221826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016558563,0.00029761175,0.00030515293,0.00023482095,0.0014815544,0.00024069138,0.00010893482,0.0008892276,0.0006917854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019911171,0.0028837263,0.4337316,0.0001104053,0.00278463,0.0012583309,0.03501876,4.807931e-7,0.0096561145,0.039557975,0.40946272,0.06354418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006743199,0.0017384407,0.22577557,0.00027596447,0.00041250518,0.0017560268,0.008678101,0.0000014069147,0.000160148,0.011503559,0.7420713,0.00088379486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015254066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033231746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33260858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006374789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010033015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783002478","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1029","title":"Can Everyday Brands Be Threatening? Responses to Brand Primes Depend on Childhood Socioeconomic Status","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Psychology; Everyday life; Norm (philosophy); Low income; Social psychology; Sociology; Socioeconomics; Population; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.03369004341931433,"score_gpt":0.3212770989791861,"score_spread":0.2875870555598718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783002478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98810744,0.0003176015,0.000047835467,0.006985918,0.0022401458,0.00022478479,0.000013005809,0.000041504456,0.0020217467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896265,0.00013386125,0.00012663992,0.008786754,0.000785748,0.000009729985,0.000008384847,0.00003404987,0.0004883124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820364,0.000067343644,0.00075180194,0.0003349937,0.0002509468,0.0003912867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983633,0.00012535747,0.0006580464,0.00036892275,0.0004096234,0.00007474552],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006181781,0.00023563819,0.00040604497,0.0008285665,0.00025687806,0.0002536259,0.00036851372,0.0001322496,0.0019065263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017585252,0.00021283438,0.00018018499,0.00021294638,0.00017910496,0.00041098078,0.000055334993,0.00028805414,0.0009352003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042854813,0.0006443281,0.6302591,0.00002886987,0.00037868798,0.00003514867,0.00065657403,0.0000026295638,0.008269446,0.00095108896,0.07895857,0.27553007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002452848,0.00007174741,0.7930006,0.000034984765,0.00012718585,0.000055974197,0.00006356266,0.0000031159625,0.0002642783,0.0006115249,0.20309074,0.0002234344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007012252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021625246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27530664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049377668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010747262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793286537","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1031","title":"If You Are Going to Pay Within the Next 24 Hours, Press 1: Automatic Planning Prompt Reduces Credit Card Delinquency","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto; University of Toronto","keywords":"Concreteness; Juvenile delinquency; Psychology; Action (physics); Credit card; Test (biology); Plan (archaeology); Debt; Business; Cognitive psychology; Finance; Payment; Criminology","score_opus":0.24459474517595206,"score_gpt":0.46298260745756364,"score_spread":0.21838786228161158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793286537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98181945,0.0010088537,0.0016798219,0.0044597206,0.009771317,0.00020361156,0.000013522752,0.000028201277,0.0010155084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912148,0.000029788234,0.0057703974,0.0013901015,0.0010851842,0.0000068821487,4.2718312e-7,0.000025580122,0.00047684004],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585116,0.00046777664,0.0019244284,0.000482338,0.0008750705,0.00039923156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994693,0.0011497625,0.0020793083,0.0008231456,0.0009807259,0.00027405698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050109257,0.00024525647,0.0006788345,0.0004370244,0.00029529477,0.0006940056,0.0018672335,0.00018708149,0.00019638833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031825954,0.00012807004,0.00022193574,0.0004429397,0.00041232014,0.00066546345,0.00014799503,0.0006407338,0.0005078666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034030533,0.00017497838,0.034839887,0.000003925653,0.000104754814,0.00020349723,0.004939629,0.00038858477,0.0012624537,0.00003081895,0.38766438,0.5700468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004341764,0.0044432166,0.19060723,0.0020200477,0.0006716127,0.0079767825,0.012737288,0.0030713382,0.0022741272,0.06796817,0.7020519,0.0018365639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011790101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017735305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56821024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005160563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020757967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6692312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800485607","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1051","title":"Urgently Yours: Temporal Communication Norms and Psychological Distance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Modalities; Mediation; Moderation; Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Modality (human–computer interaction); Through-the-lens metering; Space (punctuation); Field (mathematics); Social psychology; Closure (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Lens (geology); Sociology; Epistemology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.174126486644803,"score_gpt":0.45916423303461185,"score_spread":0.28503774638980883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800485607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9788941,0.0055067856,0.0006694662,0.0026326543,0.0018489227,0.00010496318,0.000007887615,0.000021071537,0.01031414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956719,0.00080102595,0.0011108043,0.0013612912,0.000333874,0.0000049927003,0.0000043016976,0.000013047954,0.0006987617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983384,0.0003075092,0.0006453784,0.00025506906,0.0001599451,0.0002936891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984542,0.000090064794,0.0005583111,0.00044642217,0.00027639745,0.00017459705],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046892016,0.00017826981,0.00038554185,0.00011756522,0.00012885677,0.00004089395,0.00043685082,0.00020815604,0.0022411377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060046783,0.000120108525,0.00011608176,0.00016041174,0.00084804127,0.0001459641,0.00004542062,0.00041689278,0.00018911694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022920335,0.001540271,0.57206047,0.000014305663,0.00056104583,0.00011244733,0.004971496,8.815717e-8,0.00181794,0.018364383,0.19231151,0.20595399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018708751,0.0015104215,0.854481,0.00004275602,0.000062551204,0.0014351491,0.0004643021,0.0000036641247,0.000015159836,0.005523208,0.13439062,0.00020030793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027133608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034524335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2824205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014244453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011286279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802578375","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1052","title":"The Effects of Linguistic Devices on Consumer Information Processing and Persuasion: A Language Complexity × Processing Mode Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Fondation HEC; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Persuasion; Extant taxon; Mode (computer interface); Product (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Deep linguistic processing; Romance; Information processing; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Human–computer interaction; Social psychology","score_opus":0.023352984152377004,"score_gpt":0.35806744610269714,"score_spread":0.3347144619503201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802578375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8013179,0.022091972,0.1474599,0.0028951622,0.0009903085,0.00034984565,0.0000030535289,0.00007489371,0.024817016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886876,0.00009647561,0.009683307,0.0014781748,0.000039339233,0.0000017706333,4.291692e-7,0.0000042155493,0.000008710014],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903417,0.00012386107,0.0004071808,0.00008932225,0.00020344384,0.00014203766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981992,0.00040549674,0.000618885,0.0003247053,0.000385696,0.00006597557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003791616,0.00009718992,0.0001847009,0.0001215798,0.0001970443,0.00018884947,0.00060432847,0.00006470465,0.0000037064058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007101973,0.000063682935,0.0000388073,0.00019873265,0.00045562818,0.00044780655,0.00008573482,0.00026534038,0.0000078564435],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001860228,0.00013838799,0.0012993016,0.00021326756,0.000055425644,0.000012931024,0.02245177,6.096193e-7,0.00033792667,0.022028672,0.00035342935,0.9529223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01600293,0.010861756,0.2733731,0.012591039,0.00054540974,0.0045208214,0.01013868,0.038643282,0.009695131,0.16028659,0.4605241,0.0028171563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004512387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007873328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9501051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001102828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007842565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25969148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808749165","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1065","title":"Shape‐ and Trait‐Congruency: Using Appearance‐based Cues as a Basis for Product Recommendations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Trait; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Consumer research; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Field (mathematics); Product category; Advertising; Computer science; Mathematics; Business; Geometry","score_opus":0.09088857956544044,"score_gpt":0.37683734175546124,"score_spread":0.2859487621900208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808749165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853684,0.0011717945,0.0019373368,0.008442558,0.0022412518,0.0003412594,0.0000079663605,0.000031697928,0.0004577657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99404025,0.00009836842,0.0021375173,0.002780504,0.0008094755,0.00001715456,0.0000063664575,0.000022266922,0.00008811301],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988392,0.000030192125,0.0005519729,0.00024646462,0.00013186011,0.00020031804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835604,0.00005307329,0.0005844684,0.00019748895,0.0007821741,0.000026775833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005752732,0.0001425619,0.00025057507,0.00047522155,0.00024720255,0.00017251383,0.00018662919,0.000067976296,0.00074913923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022753823,0.00013407394,0.00010795803,0.00025891495,0.00023681163,0.00064545,0.000019719204,0.00013517971,0.000058473477],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007068507,0.0003791763,0.043267764,0.00013433216,0.00016155165,0.0000056925155,0.00013281009,9.81455e-7,0.03494364,0.0008902115,0.025116991,0.89426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038925693,0.000070787326,0.23505466,0.00026908325,0.0006663166,0.00018083086,0.0001461485,0.0012198621,0.0006681779,0.0029936992,0.7543986,0.0004392612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037236994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000509681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89382076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017023414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070235685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.820255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809189556","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1063","title":"Supersize My Chances: Promotional Lotteries Impact Product Size Choices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lottery; Purchasing; Product (mathematics); Odds; Advertising; Marketing; Control (management); Business; Economics; Core (optical fiber); Microeconomics; Computer science; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.09664101364738907,"score_gpt":0.45288223318322146,"score_spread":0.3562412195358324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809189556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859744,0.0017668237,0.000053722353,0.0013084807,0.0054495037,0.00020446721,0.000034443405,0.000032189382,0.005176001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959842,0.00008167114,0.0006708452,0.0005373756,0.001182426,0.000015835565,0.0000050849894,0.000034347002,0.001488194],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979284,0.00024766283,0.000651356,0.0003764802,0.00030631613,0.0004898281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981589,0.00017393025,0.00053121516,0.000449538,0.0004956542,0.00019076365],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050363113,0.0002750433,0.00048836356,0.0002499804,0.00012942863,0.00004330592,0.00039059165,0.000159582,0.009862848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012854776,0.00020275735,0.00027172707,0.00025824722,0.00062806753,0.0002469832,0.000026374933,0.0003568098,0.0007049848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017299241,0.0021250008,0.91101754,0.0000127877365,0.0018000251,0.00035147212,0.0028823968,1.7786437e-7,0.007506129,0.00012882192,0.045773953,0.02667178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038707908,0.00257338,0.9345589,0.00004065948,0.00026801674,0.0033192192,0.00013344639,1.791515e-7,0.00067303836,0.00051260454,0.053818215,0.00023151572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004089872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014010248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026440265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051190153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010878023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99104226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896682018","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1073","title":"How Readability Shapes Social Media Engagement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Readability; Fluency; Processing fluency; Social media; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Advertising; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.07399433387570431,"score_gpt":0.3555073221353864,"score_spread":0.2815129882596821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896682018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35319442,0.0037738876,0.19741485,0.121021174,0.0034743785,0.00029640857,0.000009883911,0.00020392914,0.32061106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893659,0.000038907398,0.008406689,0.0019326701,0.00015162607,0.000001004521,2.8171726e-7,0.000004083928,0.000098859804],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989745,0.00026757037,0.00027836242,0.00012563283,0.00020188828,0.00015206847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988598,0.00021828509,0.00028359628,0.00028708618,0.00027587148,0.000075360134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008022473,0.000077376164,0.00017325743,0.000109485314,0.00009117464,0.00013596048,0.0011362743,0.000046322715,0.00009753487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025798744,0.000061717255,0.00008605853,0.0001643548,0.0002516603,0.00040362717,0.0001450466,0.00023884658,0.00004381799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009169882,0.00048784114,0.001197366,0.000008693786,0.00014831756,0.00006558503,0.0066267466,6.485258e-8,0.002826506,0.07819945,0.06342746,0.84692025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006245511,0.00023062121,0.043059576,0.000009249722,0.000013909748,0.00023748448,0.00023876336,0.000026531105,0.0003851766,0.0111670755,0.94386166,0.00014542026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.5180035e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012830064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88043416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017539476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050816823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25167567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912794133","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.002","title":"Evolutionary consumption","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Evolutionary psychology; Consilience; Darwinism; Psychology; Reciprocal altruism; Altruism (biology); Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05165076293100369,"score_gpt":0.3780762029933383,"score_spread":0.3264254400623346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912794133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94684345,0.01001397,0.0010799501,0.0033350266,0.0078074597,0.0002999447,0.000008331303,0.000055853943,0.030556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99062806,0.00025120453,0.0017323968,0.002575312,0.00046693016,0.00004650745,0.000006112157,0.000030334379,0.0042631333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772817,0.00040145442,0.0009288129,0.00029290246,0.00021911615,0.00042955732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807316,0.00019710146,0.0006371395,0.00046604083,0.00042098676,0.0002055996],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004235753,0.00021051407,0.0003973566,0.00048163813,0.00012836617,0.000016955471,0.0004285699,0.0003612594,0.053793013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037020265,0.00019001163,0.00022822843,0.00014862345,0.0005908146,0.00032256905,0.000027004156,0.00068214454,0.011965613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028013633,0.00084335724,0.30301702,0.0000061335277,0.00028381767,0.00013815604,0.00042387214,8.7071237e-7,0.0018258574,0.010877985,0.66819584,0.014106941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002027331,0.00040487119,0.87726563,0.000016783253,0.00008726628,0.0044342224,0.00010075035,0.0000011594523,0.000006024693,0.0063469745,0.10912904,0.00017992307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012868441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021586652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5742487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000046587422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004947893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9888037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914258438","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1098","title":"Compared to Dematerialized Money, Cash Increases Impatience in Intertemporal Choice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cash; Economics; Intertemporal choice; Patience; Dynamic inconsistency; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Finance; Social psychology","score_opus":0.14118398296251916,"score_gpt":0.4745694727849915,"score_spread":0.33338548982247235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914258438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949451,0.00014820998,0.00021752907,0.00069559686,0.0030970478,0.00017305037,0.000011417432,0.000007672916,0.00070436846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970469,0.000014895397,0.0013956819,0.001363041,0.00006467829,0.0000027838414,6.598015e-7,0.000011804862,0.00009957416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652857,0.00039583078,0.0018852968,0.00037654093,0.0005165181,0.0002972629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658346,0.0012110312,0.0009899682,0.0005745879,0.00040084065,0.00024011389],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026938934,0.00017277003,0.00085540407,0.0008954316,0.00003183261,0.00017689282,0.0012138641,0.00012099541,0.0013370115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017484541,0.00012612285,0.00016589079,0.0005174702,0.00009424635,0.00041196978,0.00014720364,0.00025159257,0.001203026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011639547,0.00036423662,0.88543004,0.000002258137,0.000021416148,0.00011484914,0.00042069686,0.00009369912,0.0051134,0.000018665298,0.020133805,0.08712298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006129119,0.0011331098,0.86468226,0.00021354016,0.00003412316,0.0012019244,0.00063826627,0.00021480293,0.00032791524,0.016312644,0.10861906,0.00049323705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023092495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024581002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08848525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062078296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011532801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916213717","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1101","title":"Can Implicit Theory Influence Construal Level?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Mindset; Psychology; Implicit personality theory; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Self construal; Process (computing); Social psychology; Flexibility (engineering); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematics; Interdependence","score_opus":0.08414595271185488,"score_gpt":0.4089094565931639,"score_spread":0.32476350388130903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916213717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9774752,0.0012720315,0.00008508133,0.0017855518,0.0028814424,0.0001319915,0.000025482794,0.000016072612,0.016327107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99361753,0.00009481371,0.00017185061,0.0035340232,0.000130355,0.000003265532,0.0000017347081,0.000016151842,0.0024302537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981876,0.00033631574,0.00065949355,0.00024801816,0.0001887555,0.0003798001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998373,0.0002976452,0.00054146943,0.00036643285,0.00026433574,0.00015714363],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050508097,0.00019575545,0.0004780128,0.00016998319,0.000045110355,0.000027772086,0.00046464062,0.0002076938,0.0067885146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006425766,0.00013904167,0.00018959976,0.00014950566,0.00026511133,0.00010602158,0.000035655834,0.0005196858,0.00092054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010975802,0.00028615294,0.7747464,0.000016949685,0.0008488555,0.00016581136,0.003111814,0.000004238879,0.019191248,0.09818344,0.034975626,0.067371875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022956654,0.00063705276,0.94003683,0.000041736952,0.00007087945,0.002731447,0.0009383153,5.67708e-7,0.000090518406,0.017113574,0.035809536,0.00023385834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000044892317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014953523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16529045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021814947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006783625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956053547","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1127","title":"Compensating for Innovation: Extreme Product Incongruity Encourages Consumers to Affirm Unrelated Consumption Schemas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Moderation; Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Preference; Ethnocentrism; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09975593168979328,"score_gpt":0.34366113818300925,"score_spread":0.24390520649321595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956053547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988029,0.00051043055,0.0016424754,0.0034155224,0.0042209714,0.0010377244,0.0000075104695,0.00005860941,0.0010777585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483305,0.00004926508,0.0017115609,0.0022932936,0.00034648782,0.000039577313,0.000033807824,0.000038685783,0.0006542713],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974112,0.000052136053,0.0013527704,0.00044467903,0.00036867658,0.0003705478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583393,0.00019267012,0.0014558816,0.00044173942,0.0020326797,0.000043070948],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014841002,0.0002805354,0.0005322771,0.0012322902,0.00019011211,0.00019870642,0.00038568082,0.00015505917,0.0017611774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000543075,0.00027410718,0.00016584716,0.0008991185,0.00014049534,0.000964938,0.000072330586,0.0003836772,0.0015788097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009877109,0.00038080508,0.6908437,0.00029869686,0.00027897657,0.000011639711,0.00012019243,0.00002132247,0.104615256,0.0077289194,0.02766173,0.16705102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054826536,0.000054872176,0.5951256,0.00023892468,0.00034796397,0.00012538691,0.00018299128,0.0001708481,0.0010036656,0.00083206414,0.39583114,0.00060388487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023909877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032320615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3681694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006178227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000092876886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960488248","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1128","title":"Pairing People with Products: Anthropomorphizing the Object, Dehumanizing the Person","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dehumanization; Psychology; Object (grammar); Respondent; Social psychology; Pairing; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03601764207259675,"score_gpt":0.27062757530201564,"score_spread":0.2346099332294189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960488248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9824115,0.0014611357,0.0001244267,0.01207029,0.0018678929,0.00031955776,4.4414466e-7,0.000029150136,0.001715617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973419,0.00011120028,0.00006191619,0.0017134352,0.00046513506,0.000009032439,0.0000018107614,0.000023317602,0.0002723061],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880993,0.000055090266,0.00038723575,0.00021184681,0.00030266205,0.00023323219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982575,0.00009843909,0.0007063647,0.00043223723,0.00049391855,0.000011529272],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009078148,0.0001557348,0.00023124383,0.00019885722,0.0003498164,0.00029788393,0.00047817273,0.000048667793,0.000721149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074432566,0.00008225248,0.00009315894,0.000445666,0.00018614298,0.0006352679,0.00004052359,0.00040590847,0.00041818718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046220073,0.00023698913,0.84328455,0.00012715471,0.00028706578,0.000025432833,0.001007311,0.00001661227,0.013727067,0.0018465043,0.025093768,0.113885336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014159662,0.000025735491,0.8090389,0.00009666264,0.00029577603,0.00042228968,0.0026455624,0.000056547553,0.000103775055,0.00010318559,0.18558241,0.00021318611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007350787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012525432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16048864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019689365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000421593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7896076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993438405","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1153","title":"Reminders of One's Middle Name Result in Decreased Indulgence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Indulgence; Psychology; Feeling; Association (psychology); Consumption (sociology); Preference; Social psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.08236982534563125,"score_gpt":0.3726223915068879,"score_spread":0.29025256616125666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993438405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836562,0.0013227938,0.00009937947,0.0005940541,0.0017667019,0.00017473946,0.0000083508085,0.000006049343,0.012371721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739003,0.00010567986,0.0012112814,0.00045414516,0.000044208988,0.000004058145,0.0000019988101,0.000017772798,0.0007708316],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804986,0.0002558803,0.00096192776,0.00022950783,0.00020354422,0.00029930295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983374,0.00015863426,0.0006933224,0.0004616238,0.00022588718,0.00012313388],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000718127,0.00013726794,0.0004869344,0.00048676544,0.000015566662,0.0000058451956,0.0003592481,0.00027217172,0.0033326547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008339866,0.00012762516,0.00014885388,0.0003037224,0.00016442387,0.00009452736,0.000021656519,0.0005558212,0.0002843332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019592368,0.0022824204,0.91361463,0.000033292305,0.0002491037,0.00027518946,0.002415778,0.000006751855,0.032201935,0.003502495,0.009142187,0.034317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005476648,0.00087309536,0.9808572,0.00018692548,0.000075607,0.0005159369,0.0008419315,0.0000014468392,0.00052942004,0.0007164951,0.00973501,0.00019028486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085555876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038994305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06724259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003257283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009105006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99757844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016939514","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1169","title":"Impatience and Savoring vs. Dread: Asymmetries in Anticipation Explain Consumer Time Preferences for Positive vs. Negative Events","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Negative emotion; Negative information; Event (particle physics); Motivated reasoning","score_opus":0.16149951328275258,"score_gpt":0.4368891220080851,"score_spread":0.2753896087253325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016939514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937129,0.00031960136,0.0022169647,0.0027442304,0.0005159291,0.00024117436,0.000044899687,0.0000064433384,0.0001978372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956611,0.00015179827,0.0031205243,0.0009744804,0.00005320716,0.0000068072723,0.0000016029261,0.000010331608,0.000020193753],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972988,0.00031409916,0.0012967552,0.00040840427,0.00041674433,0.00026521098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948174,0.0031861514,0.0011000369,0.00017477236,0.00053315714,0.00018852089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018379283,0.00017826159,0.00067969685,0.00051420706,0.0000949942,0.0001219808,0.00048568967,0.00013252582,0.0001095007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004603942,0.0001361559,0.00011456844,0.00048833847,0.00028448095,0.000645618,0.00007588211,0.00027789714,0.00006384708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029413272,0.00020579819,0.49300665,0.000006728134,0.00007563011,0.00003698448,0.0051346296,0.000040716805,0.0007807915,0.00010954323,0.0044930014,0.4931682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053621773,0.003519752,0.88444334,0.00022726385,0.00011967091,0.00019757322,0.0016275668,0.0011898241,0.0013640022,0.09581763,0.0056191874,0.0005120169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014875396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020442823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49265617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003520944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011471145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55522764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035280082","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1175","title":"When and Why Choices for Others Diverge from Consumers' Own Salient Goals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Winnipeg","keywords":"Salient; Extant taxon; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Perception; Social psychology; Marketing; Consumer choice; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.10072648802939055,"score_gpt":0.41836603053312604,"score_spread":0.3176395425037355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035280082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373599,0.021846639,0.0040467405,0.028916987,0.004665192,0.00052259775,0.00034930932,0.00003605472,0.0022565357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9595656,0.0005577427,0.0029494434,0.03589522,0.00048039644,0.00004068765,0.000015625774,0.000047669997,0.0004476302],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980995,0.00023469358,0.0008502483,0.0003145527,0.00013654101,0.0003644697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982258,0.00028359896,0.00065286946,0.00021212475,0.0001813439,0.00044426788],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031540534,0.00018470116,0.0004978336,0.00014111052,0.000093397815,0.000028511058,0.00029608695,0.00021426148,0.00505656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000848092,0.00015895983,0.00024274625,0.000090200156,0.00023775395,0.00013229133,0.00003173264,0.00036835123,0.00013883185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002237776,0.00049423525,0.19549763,0.000031579933,0.00063410326,0.000057727746,0.003844668,2.13824e-7,0.0014704915,0.0009507366,0.6935946,0.10118623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005515134,0.0014931347,0.10542547,0.000057932488,0.0002844022,0.0000665199,0.0005949191,0.000004205281,0.00005988825,0.0015921742,0.884694,0.00021226244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020528214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005901322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19109936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017654445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041958854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99585295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112271780","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1214","title":"Your Fries are Less Fattening than Mine: How Food Sharing Biases Fattening Judgments Without Biasing Caloric Estimates","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Popularity; Consumption (sociology); Caloric theory; Caloric intake; Psychology; Sharing economy; Calorie; Economics; Marketing; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Obesity; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.3093303409133802,"score_gpt":0.44176781473759785,"score_spread":0.13243747382421767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112271780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97654384,0.005198327,0.0030945984,0.0111801,0.0031540352,0.00020673133,0.000038193884,0.00007379567,0.0005103737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466497,0.000062026906,0.002301572,0.0021688305,0.0005083539,0.000019235642,0.000009393979,0.000068512985,0.00019709906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971345,0.00021388625,0.0010900206,0.0005078601,0.00031125313,0.00074248103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972804,0.00017089165,0.0013730486,0.00034050317,0.00032087983,0.0005142729],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003914125,0.00036690966,0.0008350509,0.00041901923,0.0002623247,0.00012769579,0.0005992288,0.00027074706,0.00038668275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003288158,0.0003345081,0.00037260374,0.00041846797,0.00020667848,0.00039017695,0.00009880959,0.0010034096,0.00008339076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051496463,0.00029383996,0.96802986,0.00005456989,0.00037720372,0.00027455218,0.0021429576,0.000009116268,0.001520391,0.00009159341,0.010302607,0.01638833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006563167,0.003262262,0.9646911,0.0014438089,0.0006873584,0.002200385,0.010325505,0.00014404544,0.0004946183,0.00024273181,0.00911588,0.00082911394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005370775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000050443152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01812113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049706618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005231963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123259145","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1221","title":"Obesity and Responsiveness to Food Marketing Before and After Bariatric Surgery","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Eating Disorders and Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Obesity; Medicine; Food marketing; Psychology; Surgery; Marketing; Business; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.022666149204985407,"score_gpt":0.31904735836002535,"score_spread":0.29638120915503996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123259145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890297,0.0073397188,0.000109231616,0.0017279286,0.0012523653,0.00007266002,0.0000067103965,0.000007823148,0.00045386297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723697,0.00022362097,0.000762483,0.0013987802,0.000111467016,0.000006940053,8.3902506e-7,0.000019357289,0.00023952516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812406,0.000683052,0.0005112845,0.0002816686,0.0001240374,0.00027586916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984368,0.0006627036,0.0002457035,0.00022645225,0.00024475896,0.00018358117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012259397,0.00014536337,0.0004248164,0.0003088893,0.00006937891,0.000032612257,0.00008139516,0.00017163111,0.0005410862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003975573,0.00013192807,0.000101238445,0.0002692775,0.000098091616,0.00006273451,0.00005829379,0.0003051409,0.000013732399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009889973,0.00020165973,0.94870615,0.000018523118,0.00010733649,0.0005878789,0.0006131596,7.0029046e-8,0.00028599933,0.000047028243,0.0037645663,0.044678602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071176316,0.000309854,0.98777956,0.000055631313,0.00010046462,0.0022709991,0.00033529243,1.15554876e-7,0.000011138761,0.00029528938,0.008002493,0.00012742844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052776795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000780082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044551175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001144722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007680065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5924514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123423801","doi":"","title":"Goal–Attribute Compatibility in Consumer Choice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Compatibility (geochemistry); Proposition; Social psychology; Consumer choice; Goal orientation; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.09357864246894111,"score_gpt":0.4624037990566397,"score_spread":0.3688251565876986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123423801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98351353,0.0049096784,0.00060329,0.0032914802,0.0042307074,0.00025112164,0.000029637462,0.000021211243,0.0031493576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968077,0.00013072373,0.00055504584,0.002120045,0.00013726258,0.000014937259,0.0000054190427,0.000021092483,0.00020777762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969866,0.00041393272,0.0015153986,0.00031180432,0.00020404499,0.000568205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998042,0.00019401757,0.00067519274,0.0004927231,0.0002956962,0.00030040572],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001003258,0.00020785454,0.00060707785,0.0004466434,0.0000657454,0.000015301726,0.00041129632,0.0002960643,0.0027555344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013174865,0.00018978151,0.0002771518,0.0003900552,0.00032133277,0.00017298566,0.000028727609,0.0010380793,0.0006668555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057357334,0.0027984912,0.9378629,0.00001832059,0.00012813075,0.00030673578,0.00065120077,0.0000071370187,0.00037638083,0.0016258238,0.027300818,0.028350525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067767445,0.00069340726,0.91288906,0.00009245225,0.000054643002,0.0007196213,0.00012905737,4.4746366e-7,0.000036463767,0.0012111203,0.077224515,0.00017245505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005777581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00065032294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0499237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014270603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016509602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124005656","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1219","title":"Consumers—Especially Women—Avoid Buying From Firms With Higher Gender Pay Gaps","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Perception; Gender pay gap; Business; Wage; Marketing; Advertising; Economics; Labour economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.045449741948497754,"score_gpt":0.29155392459838103,"score_spread":0.24610418264988326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124005656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842526,0.002551676,0.0004635043,0.0030371589,0.0042254934,0.0001319927,0.0000097065285,0.000056078483,0.005271798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913243,0.00047106596,0.0005764548,0.0051859114,0.0009749097,0.000016570959,0.000030606912,0.00004820407,0.0013719806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978097,0.000078894365,0.0008411103,0.00040728712,0.0004522285,0.0004107746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974921,0.00011801397,0.0008962369,0.0004675797,0.0009588549,0.00006721227],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044585066,0.00027331503,0.0005050732,0.00037691437,0.00018887546,0.00036061832,0.00036135234,0.00016863286,0.0116170775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082651524,0.00020836717,0.00016751152,0.00047022145,0.00021235693,0.00080885703,0.00007078698,0.0005242027,0.0007301391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001751813,0.0012513818,0.6081284,0.00015454636,0.0014360615,0.0013369127,0.00058693835,0.000006975674,0.046214197,0.0024126736,0.064746395,0.27197367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027360069,0.00001008038,0.48203522,0.000055817865,0.0002626869,0.00013817682,0.0002681337,0.0000031318389,0.00013932346,0.001543365,0.5125238,0.00028425598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004676967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000716578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4477774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006124357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016402788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124595896","doi":"10.1207/153276603768344807","title":"Preference Construction and Persistence in Digital Marketplaces: The Role of Electronic Recommendation Agents","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Key (lock); Persistence (discontinuity); Computer science; Recommender system; Business; Advertising; Microeconomics; World Wide Web; Economics; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.03144420913924482,"score_gpt":0.26327543544602455,"score_spread":0.23183122630677974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124595896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820907,0.00080939685,0.0001282381,0.00029467547,0.0002689382,0.000085289845,7.7987414e-7,0.0000036403183,0.016318357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994368,0.00027773582,0.00006726718,0.00016870264,0.000026105823,0.0000016432044,0.0000011135168,0.0000055496907,0.000015102612],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992458,0.000042096006,0.0003636433,0.00010435296,0.000090893736,0.00015318883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992268,0.00010665194,0.0004411457,0.00008964032,0.0001271877,0.000008540525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006481099,0.00008277141,0.00016223642,0.0002120095,0.00004463012,0.00005865081,0.00011505705,0.000046728444,0.0002612462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016206602,0.000063052656,0.000043512784,0.00021609207,0.00011445327,0.0005616382,0.000020708127,0.00021571523,0.0000038532103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013764309,0.000047088033,0.78847885,0.00001334667,0.000027211952,0.000001513651,0.00005629686,6.977432e-7,0.0003390955,0.0011239784,0.0001472955,0.20962696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00238419,0.00007907016,0.6747034,0.00011292009,0.00019794442,0.00049914344,0.0021708128,0.00014831604,0.00010062038,0.015905185,0.30344623,0.00025216234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013592559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028519935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30329892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013620667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031147236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28604627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124930118","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1220","title":"Everybody Thinks We Should but Nobody Does: How Combined Injunctive and Descriptive Norms Motivate Organ Donor Registration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health","keywords":"Social norms approach; Psychology; Descriptive research; Feeling; Descriptive statistics; Social psychology; Organ donation; Sociology; Perception","score_opus":0.05395230346230232,"score_gpt":0.3484350984040131,"score_spread":0.29448279494171076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124930118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90847945,0.0011238051,0.0014197485,0.07084044,0.00564994,0.00021084415,0.000012003234,0.00003490774,0.012228833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899575,0.002709765,0.0005660284,0.0030505212,0.0006102882,0.000005776824,0.0000038006683,0.000020205345,0.0030761266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755466,0.00078759436,0.0005403193,0.00034943927,0.00036744063,0.00040056187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976575,0.00030747076,0.00068059535,0.0002173595,0.0009005361,0.00023656437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000909379,0.00020735028,0.0005195257,0.0001758013,0.0003402336,0.00013022908,0.00030960547,0.0004362792,0.00038874542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082224904,0.00015730374,0.0001617023,0.0003740295,0.0009487067,0.0005283097,0.000045003326,0.00073427305,0.00002021175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052185254,0.0028246823,0.33329132,0.000079959005,0.0033353642,0.0017401363,0.16341336,0.0000011685707,0.15963857,0.063226946,0.20340908,0.06382087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011371836,0.0030492675,0.3210779,0.0002800388,0.00052939384,0.0009820117,0.11063985,0.000006743896,0.0032049005,0.120592475,0.42706242,0.0012031676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021819306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009882319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22365333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011566995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003111638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.641466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133901284","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1232","title":"The Power of Indirect Appeals in Peer‐to‐Peer Fundraising: Why “S/He” Can Raise More Money for Me Than “I” Can For Myself","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Credibility; Narrative; Power (physics); Craft; Public relations; Peer review; Field (mathematics); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; History","score_opus":0.045667851267184374,"score_gpt":0.38742441419026463,"score_spread":0.34175656292308026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133901284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8265509,0.0012877354,0.00020526155,0.15172766,0.004018888,0.00061769434,0.00009784513,0.000015862706,0.015478172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398905,0.00013867751,0.0004133834,0.0020980018,0.00027266613,0.000028014147,0.0000039569395,0.000023579561,0.0030326864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753904,0.00045339958,0.00068577984,0.0002081454,0.0005949206,0.0005187027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551755,0.0020233595,0.0004963141,0.00019595628,0.0015157609,0.00025107324],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043478664,0.00014094252,0.0005036995,0.0001778098,0.00026909015,0.00009692043,0.00043573833,0.00019440212,0.000026865036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010049606,0.00011407072,0.00026450033,0.00041924758,0.0004119337,0.000087232555,0.000029928213,0.0002531771,0.0000012888179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026558393,0.0009038604,0.073383294,0.00009024053,0.0010667156,0.00012150689,0.2931954,0.000014102078,0.0020279603,0.0068589593,0.54056275,0.07911939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023259001,0.00038770566,0.024105588,0.00014642454,0.00009433023,0.000030515623,0.03631503,0.0000018647338,0.00031744785,0.011054793,0.9249447,0.0002757101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015483388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049484097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38438195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007742482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067744794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134518768","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1233","title":"How Consumer Experience Is Shaped by the Political Orientation of Service Providers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Conscientiousness; Service provider; Counterintuitive; Service (business); Politics; Service-orientation; Marketing; Business; Big Five personality traits; Advertising; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Personality; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.050360135582141724,"score_gpt":0.4034753318584199,"score_spread":0.3531151962762782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134518768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7445282,0.0022321844,0.00074910116,0.23875004,0.0027741531,0.00014738034,0.000013154841,0.0000112600255,0.010794541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97115886,0.00031567557,0.00019025801,0.027404372,0.00020600358,0.0000066121693,0.000001469702,0.000009354905,0.0007074057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796265,0.0006161679,0.00047655642,0.00019529274,0.0003767927,0.00037251503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788505,0.00036727707,0.00046092048,0.00020027472,0.00092701835,0.00015943608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040626994,0.00010917473,0.00029869465,0.00006144013,0.00018197462,0.000058691046,0.0004070098,0.00018965577,0.0006653952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005318856,0.000082605235,0.00014225615,0.0004079429,0.0010428901,0.0002637221,0.000026398562,0.000300538,0.000017089777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008515011,0.0014081035,0.15883367,0.000057078603,0.000969472,0.0001488643,0.18495728,1.4178796e-7,0.111674525,0.15783559,0.3420159,0.041247886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022553708,0.00026706542,0.016324421,0.000046060857,0.00013910836,0.0002794541,0.1304672,0.0000034034429,0.004095891,0.012682642,0.8331726,0.00026675977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035326128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026363545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49115673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042592375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027759714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72856104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139086741","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1240","title":"Relational Spending in Funerals: Caring for Others Loved and Lost","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Planner; Social psychology; Altruism (biology); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.10288024655212076,"score_gpt":0.4131921981072984,"score_spread":0.31031195155517766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139086741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722303,0.006031529,0.0010234006,0.0018604002,0.0024226531,0.00016556954,0.000012968596,0.0000041002454,0.016249044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936715,0.0004267897,0.0022017346,0.0017785773,0.00020191468,0.000005219056,0.000005572623,0.000020914265,0.001687806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986567,0.00016338476,0.0005805568,0.00021010819,0.0001016541,0.00028763292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908626,0.00026627458,0.00031641644,0.00013867111,0.00007756449,0.00011482329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060209003,0.00010791905,0.000296043,0.00019788496,0.00004251449,0.000011703189,0.00007748515,0.00012531792,0.0008812676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050138646,0.000105211744,0.00007633778,0.000111221,0.00007343842,0.00008524388,0.00001664163,0.0002837856,0.000035157933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013060424,0.0006680718,0.9061729,0.00010888763,0.0004450299,0.0004434412,0.0043094144,0.0000072425278,0.009339143,0.030949906,0.016119234,0.030130716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012883698,0.0005627438,0.8490959,0.00023138427,0.00009303368,0.0027343754,0.002712084,0.000014378892,0.00032458382,0.008220829,0.12284313,0.00028390362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022351389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010701519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1067239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005794747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006856429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96492624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157786993","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1247","title":"Time Will Fly During Future Fun (But Drag Until Then)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Offset (computer science); Duration (music); Social psychology; Perception; Valence (chemistry); Event (particle physics); Time perception; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.031220789906321718,"score_gpt":0.3881683941423008,"score_spread":0.3569476042359791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157786993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9602592,0.012031353,0.00008129383,0.006975595,0.008456448,0.00009797612,0.0000308378,0.000030869738,0.012036437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9715676,0.0006098453,0.0005327039,0.0034947908,0.0017280037,0.0000115734,0.000011284465,0.00005613978,0.021988098],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974698,0.00045737866,0.0010165514,0.00030898268,0.00021316453,0.0005341547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980708,0.000070791044,0.00058117125,0.0005201487,0.00044101226,0.000316087],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039055728,0.00021137095,0.00051127566,0.00025745164,0.00014041053,0.000026892607,0.00034496636,0.00035390974,0.025824131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034497207,0.00018870294,0.00043321852,0.0002754544,0.00017849762,0.00021973462,0.000043058768,0.000938096,0.0014672055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036137165,0.005401599,0.05782523,0.00012702355,0.0017506088,0.009048979,0.0043641957,0.000002751444,0.032234397,0.0045328187,0.6024677,0.27863097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048182607,0.0006767139,0.39056307,0.00013203803,0.00022294892,0.01157197,0.0010783194,0.0000010904339,0.0003949673,0.0006182633,0.58958256,0.00033981065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010341978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015469179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33273783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004514276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014163293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158150180","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1246","title":"Content Hungry: How the Nutrition of Food Media Influences Social Media Engagement","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Misattribution of memory; Affect (linguistics); Social media; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Social psychology; Media content; Media use; Food choice; Caloric theory; Advertising; Business; Political science; Cognition","score_opus":0.14240521678590826,"score_gpt":0.36390884257274847,"score_spread":0.2215036257868402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158150180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94616115,0.0043292735,0.000030286308,0.032690242,0.004144065,0.000121571575,0.000018825316,0.0000128271495,0.012491738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960438,0.002073879,0.00015248447,0.0006339569,0.0010268567,0.000006415661,0.000002091608,0.00000754505,0.00005297434],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971072,0.0013741072,0.00047315797,0.00012506163,0.00065446494,0.00026601797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961148,0.002214455,0.00061846024,0.00010613287,0.00083246594,0.00011371605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025034777,0.00009950589,0.00035816978,0.000089864974,0.00028659558,0.00007572617,0.00036098572,0.00015404544,0.00011794737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057578157,0.00007543183,0.00021219802,0.00031174844,0.00096144405,0.00018196677,0.00003372494,0.0003773619,0.000004506971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008021872,0.0023820808,0.037835695,0.00013812592,0.0017259524,0.00025924336,0.28369078,5.347085e-7,0.009082057,0.09717849,0.13060068,0.43630418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041224654,0.00040424525,0.16453357,0.0002732068,0.00033265268,0.00006146951,0.18655494,3.366714e-7,0.0012584057,0.03985717,0.6022214,0.00038008147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001180104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047774517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47162077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003876994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003480757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6893059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169576137","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1259","title":"Above the Scam: Moral Elevation Reduces Gullibility","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Elevation (ballistics); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Compliance (psychology); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.17881937430449424,"score_gpt":0.3603880676703937,"score_spread":0.18156869336589948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169576137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9485956,0.0009406295,0.00022364812,0.04197071,0.0027923996,0.00006503745,0.0000058083046,0.000010604041,0.005395589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98623204,0.00054649875,0.000361629,0.012137905,0.00025511693,0.0000023443133,9.563597e-7,0.000007562353,0.0004559529],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981884,0.00048092107,0.0005249311,0.0002676069,0.00030874222,0.00022940696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871725,0.00029862186,0.00038744547,0.0002913374,0.00022070503,0.00008461858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006376756,0.000114168746,0.00022161572,0.00007558705,0.00013273039,0.000029522118,0.0003710155,0.00009499226,0.000571449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005425032,0.00007480559,0.00015016114,0.0002544364,0.00040923813,0.00016567524,0.000037880243,0.00042502154,0.00012653797],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005476071,0.0009409399,0.015483877,0.00000927242,0.00008516682,0.000415153,0.0003112937,0.000027527198,0.8332034,0.005532584,0.10272593,0.040717296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003240938,0.0005643061,0.52834475,0.000060826675,0.00010679838,0.0103482865,0.00019914571,0.00003228117,0.2059273,0.07749476,0.17332798,0.00035260143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001392902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002374397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62727606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023424649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010080813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62569654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199651959","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1270","title":"Ethical Branding in A Divided World: How Political Orientation Motivates Reactions to Marketplace Transgressions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Influencer marketing; Biology and political orientation; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Identity (music); Advertising; Business; Marketing; Political science; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12945152712010147,"score_gpt":0.3934746795166807,"score_spread":0.26402315239657925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199651959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75558436,0.00008229951,0.0027745115,0.23640302,0.0017026234,0.000094361865,0.000009109572,0.000013862649,0.0033358647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822313,0.00008230772,0.0013428455,0.015495752,0.00011600957,0.00000657685,0.0000013348229,0.000011409247,0.00071242236],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976304,0.00079321454,0.00051960716,0.00033017766,0.00032139587,0.00040521598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981578,0.0010812362,0.00016619725,0.00016951641,0.00012207286,0.00030317451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060901034,0.00013446044,0.00030216324,0.00052233133,0.00010490344,0.000035618996,0.00020026196,0.00018120176,0.00032640455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016664118,0.000116800315,0.00012634881,0.00072829024,0.0001856284,0.00015685055,0.000028304208,0.0010415505,0.000039430328],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015331539,0.0012979169,0.032939073,0.000028674936,0.00005943233,0.0015467361,0.00066637463,0.000057137786,0.88150233,0.046143524,0.028823067,0.0054025943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009738353,0.00068397465,0.65982455,0.0008282635,0.00011336724,0.009357575,0.0006379721,0.000043750864,0.09115713,0.040344123,0.18658923,0.0006817081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029392647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024739886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7903452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007047031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009053158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47629786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200021596","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1279","title":"Commentaries on “Abductive Theory Construction”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and psychological constructs research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); Ontario Council of University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Abductive reasoning; Process (computing); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Strengths and weaknesses; Action (physics); Psychology; Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Management science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07419072908917751,"score_gpt":0.4317687849387526,"score_spread":0.3575780558495751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200021596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5315891,0.009449879,0.0063114767,0.016008325,0.011712927,0.00028343778,0.00007489961,0.00004702852,0.42452297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97105485,0.0007578695,0.0025825407,0.021901542,0.00067240844,0.000014963872,0.000010198877,0.00003910166,0.0029665218],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996526,0.0016106608,0.0007040584,0.00038682733,0.00032892983,0.0004434976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959974,0.0020329074,0.00040452858,0.00045759778,0.0008884508,0.00021911507],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009192294,0.00022051124,0.0005124009,0.00032024088,0.00014247342,0.00004387541,0.000332239,0.00023676502,0.02780888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066472904,0.00018016211,0.00026136285,0.0004130515,0.0010817283,0.0001006289,0.000052583862,0.0011069764,0.0007580115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004708319,0.0012981271,0.03012405,0.000010516783,0.0017761161,0.0028543677,0.0011552015,4.0030986e-7,0.0018099016,0.35862792,0.1207971,0.476838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006773143,0.0018935928,0.08500006,0.00008338103,0.00019051312,0.016032737,0.005795634,1.6958064e-7,0.0013626814,0.17327645,0.7091588,0.0004328819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000381908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000042842275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5883617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038255206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001443493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9742957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200124202","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1283","title":"The wellbeing implications of maximizing: A conceptual framework and meta‐analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Maximization; Process (computing); Focus (optics); Conceptual framework; Meta-analysis; Decision maker; Social psychology; Management science; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.24260888221096222,"score_gpt":0.47723490670550184,"score_spread":0.23462602449453962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200124202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91844416,0.021378811,0.032824982,0.025000032,0.00076649006,0.000067445326,0.0000246756,0.000005533816,0.0014878649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883665,0.0006931651,0.009912463,0.0008532965,0.000030262081,0.000001762949,2.939697e-7,0.0000058798955,0.00013637474],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997601,0.00035992105,0.0012835767,0.00025007362,0.00034464177,0.00016082502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917673,0.005388275,0.0011795062,0.0006626095,0.0008943546,0.00010799165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024986472,0.00010248618,0.00083007617,0.0002900611,0.000160477,0.00014200548,0.00061395887,0.00011604635,0.0005412228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020255623,0.00005919976,0.0006792056,0.0008733033,0.00050644216,0.00012340792,0.00009299506,0.00031182313,0.000016857162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044493313,0.00073095545,0.12313361,0.0000044012795,0.092581004,0.00019705982,0.0031457508,0.00048611328,0.0032151004,0.06400559,0.025115041,0.68694043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006450718,0.00016540657,0.06430131,0.0000064338105,0.055313386,0.00092253136,0.0026351656,0.000041887648,0.0002601178,0.6819989,0.19348085,0.00022895857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000030398487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027412238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6867115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008646228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010614447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.592601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205103961","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1286","title":"The role of original process in creating product essence and authenticity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Perception; Process (computing); Value (mathematics); Product (mathematics); Psychology; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012447665524552433,"score_gpt":0.3234016227987885,"score_spread":0.310953957274236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205103961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898746,0.004310509,0.0002015639,0.00068412046,0.00058804144,0.000057279663,8.421333e-7,0.000005237271,0.004277804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995559,0.00017021834,0.00016075122,0.000038073118,0.000029302628,0.0000046454484,8.955623e-8,0.0000050668546,0.00003595228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940836,0.00010900125,0.00024909794,0.000049890794,0.00009819889,0.000085471365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994817,0.00020717911,0.00015552157,0.000075928976,0.000055763292,0.000023938594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070634164,0.000041846823,0.000097598335,0.000073720745,0.00006689239,0.000009435038,0.000120074685,0.000011435455,0.000086074266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013090177,0.000033228338,0.000013800094,0.00014399216,0.000046190544,0.00008255183,0.00000797553,0.00029489415,0.0000011041484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011852196,0.0009060431,0.54462177,0.00022781521,0.0004390136,0.00007213574,0.02690724,0.0053023864,0.07002482,0.0130202025,0.0064652353,0.33082813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022019425,0.00045523862,0.20090207,0.00007554099,0.00012797838,0.0043624267,0.012062992,0.0036802734,0.005097774,0.022978568,0.74768347,0.00037175132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003489632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002259105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7412182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013088331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005016851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13550122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226494581","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1300","title":"The case for qualitative research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Set (abstract data type); Consumer research; Process (computing); Psychology; Management science; Epistemology; Qualitative analysis; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Marketing; Computer science; Social science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.25112350338613937,"score_gpt":0.5099098500403135,"score_spread":0.25878634665417416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226494581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724167,0.0025899175,0.00045875792,0.01831104,0.0041902736,0.00045734833,0.0000101148225,0.000018555527,0.0015472973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977546,0.00007161592,0.000082956576,0.00090912083,0.00031926256,0.000110389075,0.0000035249136,0.000013782612,0.00073474925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985919,0.0002651589,0.00049678696,0.0001363038,0.00028535136,0.00022452539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975885,0.0007938402,0.00045677036,0.000224885,0.0009223536,0.000013634857],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006324127,0.0000713656,0.00013674474,0.00038351968,0.0013898845,0.00017180874,0.0003755167,0.000028940303,0.00045231244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038600515,0.000054515996,0.00012404648,0.0003842093,0.00021906567,0.00025383467,0.00009171267,0.0004313443,0.00006504942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011079657,0.0003146782,0.0017437635,0.000030160143,0.00013970844,0.00032337394,0.0010928442,0.000003185414,0.0013307753,0.034537513,0.48549175,0.47388428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011187324,0.000025026997,0.002741991,0.0000033776384,0.000057450714,0.0010791053,0.007464201,0.000028029583,0.000005268145,0.0143435225,0.97305715,0.000076141805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004249823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000056618795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4875654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003375161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047822574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231619077","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1006","title":"Gift Giving at Israeli Weddings as a Function of Genetic Relatedness and Kinship Certainty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Kinship; Certainty; Lineage (genetic); Function (biology); Gift giving; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Genealogy; Social psychology; Psychology; Biology; Genetics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Anthropology; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.046175579482988297,"score_gpt":0.37450981057239624,"score_spread":0.32833423108940796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231619077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730238,0.0045827767,0.0002034604,0.00151212,0.0047196033,0.00014777793,0.000008071528,0.000016488393,0.015785942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99439925,0.0003046639,0.00026518095,0.00066123775,0.0002167212,0.000008354361,0.0000016342818,0.000032368738,0.0041106176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775344,0.0003277436,0.0009407262,0.0003942009,0.00020341587,0.00038045394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967971,0.00019962262,0.0017364908,0.0008013897,0.00028168692,0.00018372595],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078253757,0.00023730661,0.00055652607,0.00036717896,0.00046827347,0.000027444263,0.0005269266,0.0005041579,0.003982681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015269083,0.00022152075,0.00019113946,0.000066374814,0.0011204003,0.0002013698,0.00009461956,0.0006863128,0.00026282432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030375314,0.00051863294,0.939142,0.000029467146,0.000548179,0.0003706093,0.0014820513,0.0000012724837,0.006314651,0.0049679335,0.026965963,0.016621737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003205305,0.00082098943,0.9469406,0.000054804474,0.00026919166,0.003690076,0.00016003751,0.0000010362912,0.000019283309,0.0041763484,0.04047242,0.00018992048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040681985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034288292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021375462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041986343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044981465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236704525","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1060","title":"Issue Information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.020749846900492364,"score_gpt":0.28915035907963477,"score_spread":0.2684005121791424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236704525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004087143,0.0031499057,0.0025182168,0.006633976,0.06296042,0.00031719374,0.000016910113,0.000022920773,0.92029333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15406239,0.006779549,0.0010649862,0.19524989,0.037095334,0.000024233072,0.00078235404,0.00022396953,0.6047173],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985544,0.000019515739,0.0008575026,0.00011379392,0.00026312965,0.00019167602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953045,0.00003568429,0.0036487372,0.00024631314,0.00075017853,0.0000145526055],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035933373,0.00021279902,0.0004912421,0.0007915253,0.000045954406,0.00019879159,0.00039625383,0.0002771664,0.015639864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087788794,0.00018217284,0.000164894,0.0002893421,0.0000570755,0.0015753823,0.000051071456,0.00057369005,0.17002039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000894352,0.00002941986,0.00035213953,0.00014921422,0.00006034823,0.0000040723226,0.000016538575,0.000027835373,0.000042755793,0.00025874327,0.9794138,0.019555673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009259339,0.00001956756,0.0010795892,0.00010719717,0.000052271447,0.000036898095,0.00003145004,0.000021439697,0.0000044147396,0.00021428891,0.9973174,0.00018958062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018856266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037161606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.315576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022177644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009595876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98525995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241276725","doi":"10.1016/s1057-7408(11)00060-x","title":"Editorial Board","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University; University of Toronto; The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Citation; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology","score_opus":0.059816508839576746,"score_gpt":0.2869215771898801,"score_spread":0.22710506835030336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241276725","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010325776,0.019732432,0.00010754131,0.00019210982,0.54159415,0.00011204462,0.0005592712,0.0000045293987,0.43666533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053731576,0.104411036,0.00080522854,0.0012341727,0.19100446,0.000013161663,0.000022248843,0.00013284627,0.69700366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953626,0.00008605905,0.0029504914,0.0007702892,0.000115919625,0.00071463326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993244,0.00016144919,0.005190667,0.0006916606,0.00041403685,0.00029816813],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018141195,0.00053972617,0.0024056812,0.0011692151,0.00017462946,0.00016545772,0.001222478,0.0010084107,0.076735094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021749882,0.0005809526,0.00092087046,0.00023819366,0.00075350964,0.00035078233,0.00019356655,0.0012594184,0.20430186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003569229,0.00025961292,0.0036402137,0.000049062175,0.0015964714,0.000021680942,0.00049307465,0.0000027461576,0.0000032111177,0.0019758816,0.9905096,0.0010915076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002338073,0.00037099034,0.001432942,0.00008684839,0.00014773157,0.00007380917,0.0001248988,0.0000020240273,0.0000034078237,0.0019226563,0.99296355,0.0005330546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007049668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003879583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3505897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014867928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018810517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249165174","doi":"10.1016/s1057-7408(09)00116-8","title":"Editorial Board","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; University of Pittsburgh; University of Washington; Jain University; University of Minnesota; Ohio State University; Dartmouth College; University of Miami","keywords":"Editorial board; Citation; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology","score_opus":0.039689426026858,"score_gpt":0.2919837932613343,"score_spread":0.2522943672344763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249165174","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010954648,0.026513766,0.0001065826,0.00079515716,0.5650206,0.00012928183,0.00051548216,0.000005516556,0.40581816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004962477,0.1143361,0.0008122037,0.0025879606,0.24257836,0.000007461588,0.000029280238,0.000101342375,0.63458484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952493,0.00008571646,0.0030137224,0.00077692117,0.00014139812,0.00073295453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935777,0.00018007483,0.00490281,0.000653737,0.00039194096,0.0002937084],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018185052,0.00054960273,0.0025251696,0.0011973506,0.00018739917,0.0002459825,0.0011308935,0.0010005236,0.031933274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023955683,0.00059914205,0.0009473937,0.00028114923,0.0005478048,0.00034385698,0.000118089396,0.001318542,0.13312973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029966226,0.00026259926,0.00146758,0.000032847263,0.0010769657,0.000025594014,0.000225238,0.000014717491,0.000004557909,0.0011841268,0.99231035,0.0030957605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026249683,0.0004788663,0.0017311954,0.00009658176,0.0001287299,0.00008173472,0.00009078721,0.0000046070586,0.0000022780916,0.001978199,0.99224454,0.0005375349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027073313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024891688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32244223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019500879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019113721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252970193","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1026","title":"Issue Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Technion-Israel Institute of Technology; Fudan University; University of Oxford; University of Alberta; University of Cincinnati; University of Pittsburgh; University of Washington; McGill University; Arizona State University; Universität zu Köln; Boston College; Washington University in St. Louis; University of South Carolina; University of Minnesota; Northwestern University; York University; University of Miami; George Washington University; University of Texas at San Antonio; University of Pennsylvania; Temple University; Vanderbilt University; University of Central Florida; San Diego State University; National University of Singapore; Ohio State University; University of Southern California; Florida State University; Nanyang Technological University; Georgetown University","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.027771081021503646,"score_gpt":0.3456304051189284,"score_spread":0.31785932409742473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252970193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007601483,0.0039045867,0.017138477,0.0005390915,0.1525882,0.0002433392,0.000053285115,0.00007298188,0.8178585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07768714,0.09434178,0.011052224,0.025063131,0.12344938,0.00008835015,0.0015387504,0.0007674621,0.6660118],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875915,0.00007074057,0.00073612336,0.000059228096,0.00022155364,0.00015322126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989821,0.000023793742,0.00038287404,0.00018402495,0.0003477894,0.00007945904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033738476,0.0001681347,0.00033680932,0.0004690487,0.00003073073,0.000038229602,0.00020806082,0.0003925228,0.24373971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027663677,0.0001572654,0.00011437524,0.00008353093,0.0000770188,0.0003228832,0.000007894977,0.00050762563,0.39113936],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018433784,0.000008167806,0.000003868792,0.000048265683,0.000095801726,9.620272e-7,0.00029876007,0.00024556226,0.00017319157,3.9671187e-7,0.98321015,0.01589647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005063084,0.00009594461,0.00044024785,0.00006015818,0.000045137433,0.00011180926,0.000023418908,0.000113529655,0.000024111558,0.00002772184,0.9984094,0.00014223442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.1075113e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.805785e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15184677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070401555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005589637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75695163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283162852","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1313","title":"How to overcome algorithm aversion: Learning from mistakes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); Mediation; Moderation; Advice (programming); Loss aversion; Product (mathematics); Algorithm; Process (computing); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Machine learning; Microeconomics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10464647738916319,"score_gpt":0.30530597486133676,"score_spread":0.20065949747217357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283162852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93678755,0.00067914143,0.004654269,0.049661253,0.0055119777,0.00011803734,0.000038131973,0.000029391806,0.0025202478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770763,0.00009534627,0.0029576183,0.016942618,0.00031057597,0.0000063870793,0.000002668109,0.000017157849,0.0025913273],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816227,0.00045938257,0.00032649506,0.00031009846,0.00047101502,0.00027076027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989954,0.00025624887,0.000325547,0.00017687415,0.000057989142,0.00018792161],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033870141,0.00013250942,0.0002751666,0.00023914846,0.00028822813,0.000034152756,0.00051254133,0.000054545366,0.0013036925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018177788,0.00012180976,0.00014483338,0.00023354305,0.000111974645,0.00013220741,0.00008232422,0.00075496454,0.0001127412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018193858,0.0013905015,0.008588507,0.000007250135,0.00019585548,0.0030813112,0.0020040711,0.00087361893,0.5141099,0.00052021124,0.29617968,0.17122969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001887616,0.0011382978,0.014668494,0.00001140242,0.000029418483,0.002004928,0.00043548227,0.00004614402,0.0033122327,0.0023019123,0.97395325,0.00021080121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005885402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.9349757e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6777736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006192672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000356432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289755119","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1323","title":"Rethinking scarcity and poverty: Building bridges for shared insight and impact","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Poverty; Leverage (statistics); Resource scarcity; Population; Resource (disambiguation); Development economics; Sociology; Construct (python library); Economics; Economic growth; Natural resource economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05380889658434694,"score_gpt":0.3818721448854202,"score_spread":0.32806324830107325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289755119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9816222,0.0070064836,0.0019174115,0.0030710981,0.002653525,0.00022931161,0.000052684838,0.000029548728,0.0034177199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945579,0.00029055474,0.0012287509,0.0034953896,0.00023825585,0.000021226839,0.0000041905096,0.000025889813,0.00013782538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980054,0.00048772385,0.00057091465,0.00037327915,0.00020502644,0.00035768197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834853,0.00058466283,0.00055657,0.00022962614,0.000104092884,0.00017652358],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013125682,0.00019606699,0.00046539184,0.00033201792,0.0003341142,0.000048188118,0.00020914523,0.0001626328,0.00095400185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016439076,0.00016526708,0.00016270581,0.00016964274,0.00015814847,0.00014058458,0.000077128105,0.00076230854,0.0000034383627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007333546,0.000685684,0.5393214,0.000054889584,0.0015165445,0.00034510525,0.009746253,0.00003734586,0.017482346,0.007941875,0.19744022,0.21809475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005476259,0.0024253,0.80380344,0.000034747878,0.00016251972,0.0071907323,0.000341861,0.00005352031,0.000046250978,0.03629569,0.14382316,0.00034653037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049690556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037192974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.264482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006145335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032161228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308752168","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1331","title":"The spiritual contagion scale: A measure of beliefs in the transfer of metaphysical properties","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Psychology; Disgust; Scale (ratio); Construct (python library); Discriminant validity; Social psychology; Metaphysics; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Developmental psychology; Psychometrics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11995590662587134,"score_gpt":0.30641844753229613,"score_spread":0.18646254090642478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308752168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764531,0.00142633,0.000060663016,0.020397821,0.00065519643,0.00016624827,0.000009692669,0.0000023425657,0.00082859746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972042,0.00020798131,0.00001703595,0.0024765756,0.00004313965,0.000012573288,1.8370473e-7,0.000005789097,0.000032510026],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740434,0.0010537069,0.0006363363,0.00014744123,0.00057271926,0.0001854753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991279,0.0003183503,0.00023472036,0.00020218214,0.000085072854,0.000031774736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013455438,0.00009844339,0.00030252474,0.00011352759,0.00014276076,0.0000061117075,0.00068475876,0.000042087195,0.000052276086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009843864,0.000051038656,0.00018709412,0.00025564892,0.00074199593,0.00006551945,0.000031379244,0.00056922436,0.000002833393],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036348004,0.00245463,0.0054364554,0.000023662662,0.00011550116,0.00008282814,0.0039653224,0.000076612254,0.95494694,0.0059590507,0.008227095,0.015077088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022963235,0.013860873,0.51568204,0.00031373318,0.0004811175,0.011174378,0.00662465,0.00007863285,0.20574929,0.023855213,0.1983334,0.0008834546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008213403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011895191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74919766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014143588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059268576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2733915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323315086","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1346","title":"Style, content, and the success of ideas","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Function (biology); Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Content (measure theory); Class (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Variance (accounting); Natural (archaeology); Writing style; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04070871232479893,"score_gpt":0.3619696436976745,"score_spread":0.32126093137287554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323315086","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40001428,0.0050229374,0.5788813,0.013427072,0.0006826607,0.0001672994,0.0000017226783,0.000092942,0.0017097751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902252,0.0014787768,0.007527016,0.00064113695,0.000025565807,0.0000023344512,1.2285442e-7,0.000005048512,0.000094819414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988672,0.00018202153,0.0004969028,0.00012474747,0.00018867417,0.00014044959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834824,0.0004061441,0.00059056963,0.00035244625,0.00025417408,0.000048450114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00104112,0.00007785404,0.00034453644,0.0002760902,0.00003885812,0.000023251523,0.00078010926,0.000047582947,0.000008780778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015768736,0.000047246864,0.000113054324,0.0005015659,0.00038358496,0.00024340367,0.00011992315,0.000191854,0.0000071925847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008145617,0.0002908822,0.103124954,0.000053947162,0.001474962,0.0003956663,0.0027918404,0.000030534397,0.021660326,0.40460342,0.050434634,0.41432425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016087068,0.0009787,0.3944449,0.00019535415,0.00038360915,0.0028616483,0.00034186244,0.0037487408,0.0076820957,0.50189584,0.07071438,0.000665781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000070195247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004509073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5902109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000056037643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023783872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19266711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353079166","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1304","title":"Issue Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Internet privacy; Library science","score_opus":0.05672156392501933,"score_gpt":0.2954887991675297,"score_spread":0.23876723524251037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4353079166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016476573,0.008460009,0.00036699857,0.0010430242,0.094163455,0.00009076237,0.00078638963,0.0000091747215,0.8949154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005125296,0.016208818,0.00021611663,0.0016845823,0.00088627485,0.0000056132494,0.000043407177,0.000027593765,0.98041505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979165,0.000017271737,0.001544641,0.00020283464,0.00004303152,0.0002756887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970952,0.00006574131,0.0023373803,0.0002879043,0.0001289167,0.00008480218],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008751372,0.00018888655,0.00089224585,0.0009848321,0.00006665112,0.0000867871,0.00044695346,0.00029781036,0.062508844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013035514,0.000199283,0.00027622373,0.00020956909,0.00015167797,0.00040807447,0.00007096556,0.00041474547,0.75742996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024469204,0.000020347183,0.00010761452,0.000029932211,0.00033298315,0.0000043072855,0.00030088567,0.000013847871,2.988214e-7,0.0009709292,0.9965724,0.0016219957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006451392,0.000057848658,0.00034729304,0.000030564497,0.000018125247,0.000032321568,0.00013001269,0.0000057173165,0.0000010187704,0.0011649821,0.99738204,0.00018492067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020748943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013217839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69492114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006875736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047973695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9383482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366489390","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1354","title":"Mental accounting of product returns","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mental accounting; Product (mathematics); Lottery; Purchasing; Economics; Revenue; Value (mathematics); Monetary economics; Business; Fungibility; Time value of money; Microeconomics; Marketing; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.2204257693242787,"score_gpt":0.5006127997533809,"score_spread":0.2801870304291022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366489390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99180293,0.00033499207,0.000055302506,0.002290116,0.0038449373,0.000056795438,0.0000097901975,0.000011222549,0.001593886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849796,0.00013814942,0.00068411743,0.0002459112,0.00015553237,6.027906e-7,6.399191e-7,0.000010265826,0.00026684086],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731064,0.0001438638,0.0014528426,0.00025035403,0.00062882673,0.00021347245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968887,0.0006855119,0.0013722166,0.0004513281,0.0005222459,0.00008002514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046891198,0.00010314284,0.00047089698,0.0007691582,0.000057233443,0.000065057444,0.00081611535,0.00007835785,0.0004425866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018726805,0.00007264791,0.00022003693,0.00077602157,0.00017086722,0.0002829794,0.000093139024,0.00025819146,0.00048738287],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017288835,0.0001183404,0.122153364,0.0000021467902,0.000044903703,0.000072031115,0.00057891896,0.000016757853,0.009617715,0.00004233916,0.1931283,0.6740523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002666405,0.0006419327,0.3640683,0.000121464596,0.00009837862,0.0021100051,0.00198143,0.0001451448,0.002692057,0.09947154,0.5255918,0.00041153588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002440156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000059049567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6736407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018069459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008593585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62644833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367059815","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1357","title":"The digital frontier as a liminal space","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liminality; Metaverse; Metaphor; Possible world; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Virtual reality; Human–computer interaction; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03191957786622684,"score_gpt":0.3101797243876665,"score_spread":0.27826014652143966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367059815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93578637,0.0028774175,0.000060003917,0.033878785,0.0038223267,0.00013786623,0.0000018888122,0.00007699532,0.023358375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587476,0.0004600651,0.000031274478,0.00063244946,0.00042972012,0.000006731122,0.0000016428274,0.000028409602,0.0025349322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872434,0.000017274659,0.00045174116,0.00015376307,0.00030270233,0.00035015965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879104,0.00016815423,0.00048609512,0.00024996034,0.00028451683,0.000020208898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005347161,0.0001575496,0.0002750946,0.00033014483,0.00024991235,0.00032645636,0.00042578674,0.00006435524,0.00012714938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003665288,0.00010530826,0.0001860969,0.00049844856,0.000265226,0.00049105065,0.00015987376,0.00030578492,0.002547808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026587085,0.00006781367,0.5353974,0.000012530928,0.00024385464,0.00032584378,0.000047827623,2.8415647e-7,0.00018336507,0.0029943392,0.17330165,0.28715923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006346925,0.00003191889,0.16913213,0.00001642904,0.00011454518,0.00014621728,0.00028543008,0.000008083601,0.0000020975046,0.0011212176,0.8283969,0.000110300134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010675822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000331882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6550953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001389921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003182103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377943582","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1364","title":"Getting political: The value‐protective effects of expressed outgroup outrage on self‐brand connection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Trent University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outrage; Premise; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Advertising; Brand engagement; Politics; Psychology; Social media; Marketing; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.026381069078898235,"score_gpt":0.3770577846298936,"score_spread":0.35067671555099533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377943582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9517082,0.0002679149,0.0006178647,0.016443787,0.0054008313,0.00039265485,0.0000033018885,0.000075391355,0.025090061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967758,0.00018461849,0.0000619703,0.0021706845,0.00064548885,0.000014567491,3.735968e-7,0.000015808124,0.00013068382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724394,0.0012625932,0.00050645875,0.00018775585,0.0003427502,0.0004565057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968055,0.0021688773,0.0004847267,0.00018210437,0.00023258435,0.00012624156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016373612,0.00012821244,0.0003661389,0.00023453991,0.0002866459,0.000021689933,0.0003776837,0.0002347391,0.00006382835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014053973,0.00009151714,0.00022007841,0.00043378441,0.0005627541,0.00010590026,0.000022981974,0.00051651197,0.000051221738],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029953548,0.0024246662,0.024393031,0.00023912333,0.0027249076,0.0004483167,0.12716055,0.0000233172,0.13542575,0.52925396,0.102589175,0.07232187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012638669,0.004866172,0.46250576,0.00061398797,0.00058476994,0.00019502833,0.027779615,0.000039542498,0.013580578,0.26548517,0.21077387,0.0009368421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017752693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003357033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43811274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000611567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007551288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37319607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381851830","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1305","title":"Issue Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science","score_opus":0.05672156392501933,"score_gpt":0.2954887991675297,"score_spread":0.23876723524251037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381851830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016476573,0.008460009,0.00036699857,0.0010430242,0.094163455,0.00009076237,0.00078638963,0.0000091747215,0.8949154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005125296,0.016208818,0.00021611663,0.0016845823,0.00088627485,0.0000056132494,0.000043407177,0.000027593765,0.98041505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979165,0.000017271737,0.001544641,0.00020283464,0.00004303152,0.0002756887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970952,0.00006574131,0.0023373803,0.0002879043,0.0001289167,0.00008480218],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008751372,0.00018888655,0.00089224585,0.0009848321,0.00006665112,0.0000867871,0.00044695346,0.00029781036,0.062508844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013035514,0.000199283,0.00027622373,0.00020956909,0.00015167797,0.00040807447,0.00007096556,0.00041474547,0.75742996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024469204,0.000020347183,0.00010761452,0.000029932211,0.00033298315,0.0000043072855,0.00030088567,0.000013847871,2.988214e-7,0.0009709292,0.9965724,0.0016219957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006451392,0.000057848658,0.00034729304,0.000030564497,0.000018125247,0.000032321568,0.00013001269,0.0000057173165,0.0000010187704,0.0011649821,0.99738204,0.00018492067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020748943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013217839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69492114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006875736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047973695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9383482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383104799","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1373","title":"Perceived corruption reduces algorithm aversion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Language change; Salience (neuroscience); Inequity aversion; Injustice; Leverage (statistics); Scholarship; Axiom; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Economics; Democracy; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Inequality; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.13695424656267535,"score_gpt":0.3595646520250577,"score_spread":0.22261040546238237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383104799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839372,0.000104731305,0.00043481172,0.008219693,0.004498466,0.00006888154,0.0000072328944,0.000047000725,0.002682007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99199045,0.001845983,0.00089138985,0.0038767334,0.00029834767,0.0000022488248,0.0000026883317,0.000013400896,0.0010787495],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985823,0.0002136476,0.00040355997,0.0002348997,0.00030369888,0.00026189824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918276,0.00016788217,0.00029817355,0.0001391914,0.000090627414,0.00012135487],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040746742,0.00011488501,0.00021987602,0.00036494486,0.00011387261,0.000014711327,0.00030356456,0.00011694165,0.00033782472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015150302,0.000093885435,0.00013269368,0.00033436186,0.0002350393,0.00016801002,0.000033317916,0.00031668777,0.0013396323],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027116062,0.0002531153,0.00071302336,0.0000047908634,0.000030462228,0.00048588653,0.00026150444,0.000026945685,0.70924044,0.00012334887,0.14152467,0.14706467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008252095,0.002403703,0.5466282,0.00019231251,0.00013155583,0.011040084,0.00046926903,0.00076736894,0.051089294,0.015268244,0.3630071,0.0007507824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010442544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.8636295e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6581511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025008032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003136359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384133227","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1377","title":"<scp>PassivePy</scp>: A tool to automatically identify passive voice in big text data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Attribution; Computer science; Relevance (law); Deception; Voice analysis; Psychology; Python (programming language); Passive voice; Data science; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Speech recognition; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04559678330392432,"score_gpt":0.35054895507893064,"score_spread":0.30495217177500633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384133227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79979944,0.0002560876,0.18269701,0.009413369,0.00550679,0.00030804295,0.000012858638,0.00018406675,0.0018223423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94879925,0.0004680882,0.042189345,0.00630342,0.0006783713,0.0000321532,0.000009032432,0.00005360877,0.0014667283],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753773,0.0002553605,0.0008152789,0.0004514649,0.00043920818,0.0005009349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975628,0.00053040317,0.0004004801,0.001046482,0.00024100381,0.00021878124],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012365163,0.00017322974,0.00037896307,0.00091391307,0.00007514781,0.00017317254,0.0021280402,0.00015856001,0.000015437265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014576314,0.00015460237,0.00008606878,0.0016343624,0.0000658985,0.000544811,0.000455279,0.000510667,0.0016281697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042020085,0.0002884021,0.004345898,0.000030732695,0.00020887205,0.0023629626,0.0012936204,0.00008001618,0.015467966,0.0009801757,0.33942056,0.6354788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031296979,0.00084763154,0.4517496,0.00023937436,0.000059383103,0.0026517191,0.00023722772,0.0058808587,0.0011453531,0.0077296463,0.5260258,0.0003037174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012012241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004275778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63517505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043049284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387104359","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1383","title":"Consumer insights from text analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03481380192276312,"score_gpt":0.3748412511675557,"score_spread":0.34002744924479256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387104359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8933229,0.0015276659,0.00007644793,0.0034949144,0.0025895964,0.000060706046,0.000010682263,0.00006084269,0.09885623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958737,0.0016442518,0.00013524499,0.00073899777,0.00044095045,0.0000020226616,0.0000049009177,0.000010560367,0.0011493828],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979737,0.0005970375,0.0005031033,0.00017154322,0.0004517079,0.0003029277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767005,0.0012314274,0.00039704776,0.0001731546,0.0002856552,0.00024266717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009553354,0.00010581454,0.00044355734,0.00058234384,0.00020949512,0.00007634069,0.00037123778,0.00018875753,0.00050449866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013747499,0.00009349869,0.00030454458,0.0017110453,0.0005358271,0.00018184478,0.000025640173,0.0002780695,0.00047411467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043228897,0.00041836957,0.4392068,0.000008721003,0.006427301,0.0007082465,0.04094333,0.000012089919,0.0007230635,0.00842334,0.28140292,0.22129354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000669436,0.00005177424,0.20579813,0.00001984132,0.00052220444,0.0000033402084,0.003431794,0.000005049584,0.000008710042,0.013161936,0.7761533,0.0001744618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030376116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072583294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4947504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034464276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001858226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6093943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388419024","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1395","title":"When cash costs you: The pain of holding coins over banknotes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cash; Purchasing; Incentive; Economics; Donation; Purchasing power; Power (physics); Monetary economics; Business; Demographic economics; Marketing; Finance; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03840024707187429,"score_gpt":0.37292752823457487,"score_spread":0.3345272811627006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388419024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9519153,0.0031303244,0.00093623274,0.014854705,0.005813584,0.00023791888,0.000026992888,0.000047933136,0.023037009],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928105,0.00075112935,0.00010691585,0.0044700434,0.00050134043,0.0000054901775,0.0000035384662,0.000029443128,0.0013215854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974357,0.00091681903,0.0007498712,0.00019372636,0.00030846643,0.00039544262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974423,0.0011325964,0.00066076213,0.00037739234,0.0002696207,0.000117311094],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032698705,0.0001623549,0.0004451798,0.00025597622,0.0001548135,0.000017776882,0.00048599252,0.00027308596,0.0018167584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005934657,0.000117012554,0.00029213092,0.00041146955,0.00034250473,0.000086999644,0.00006694485,0.000567945,0.00024382146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007175422,0.00029661175,0.08389332,0.000024778265,0.00076872844,0.0003516656,0.01205342,0.000008675905,0.0046686498,0.008323435,0.6792233,0.20966989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034322354,0.00061461574,0.32514971,0.000109273504,0.00017786038,0.00057148316,0.002694609,0.00003396363,0.00008589497,0.0082029635,0.6586486,0.00027878917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008812531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033938126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2412564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034562458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007067059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99909574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389274685","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1401","title":"How rejected recommendations shape recommenders' future product intentions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Oregon State University","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Salient; Outcome (game theory); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Computer science; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06942828736507858,"score_gpt":0.3294402459328675,"score_spread":0.2600119585677889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389274685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5819121,0.0012271125,0.0005855427,0.3891431,0.021702718,0.00054845866,0.000014850823,0.00042659786,0.004439502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907131,0.001775968,0.00044252205,0.0028725814,0.0020810664,0.00003199302,0.00009002366,0.000043257965,0.0019494814],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984475,0.00006144135,0.00061422284,0.00027048544,0.0003324657,0.0002739315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979122,0.00005637507,0.00074874714,0.00035962576,0.0008918399,0.000031174102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007637761,0.00017501184,0.00027591293,0.0012044243,0.00024877678,0.00034440256,0.0003760516,0.000101923346,0.0011227257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027154747,0.00016176223,0.00020295758,0.0012639409,0.00009474958,0.0011346521,0.000064151005,0.00041698536,0.00041822146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007512457,0.00015706138,0.01605463,0.00002719075,0.00009151872,0.0000152068815,0.000046152483,2.8149276e-7,0.004904973,0.00084715436,0.44430837,0.53347236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00094690925,0.0000067140554,0.22234735,0.00003857272,0.00015393147,0.0000780798,0.00059265894,0.00004449975,0.00002288593,0.00103243,0.77456856,0.00016743406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004465787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028306853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5333049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024485444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045174962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390598840","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1360","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.023969418352529238,"score_gpt":0.4010695297587587,"score_spread":0.37710011140622945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390598840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001473192,0.026038803,0.00020776065,0.025000026,0.047956944,0.00012568224,0.00004280905,0.000009726576,0.9004709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025079748,0.07831268,0.00072389306,0.007258763,0.016062671,0.000013603959,0.000053449214,0.000051122868,0.8724441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986038,0.00016096044,0.00060624053,0.000081951315,0.00033089385,0.00021614149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867105,0.00009563966,0.0005443334,0.00012026012,0.00046732978,0.00010140039],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056738174,0.0001254238,0.0003508334,0.00035643764,0.00023046533,0.00010360431,0.00023880685,0.00037473862,0.007432562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009725874,0.00009655745,0.00021708386,0.00025960847,0.0003653933,0.0002982998,0.000028794888,0.0006296058,0.020906812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016249442,0.000013184819,0.0000063752955,0.000028028498,0.00018265184,0.000011652285,0.0038720646,0.0000026386601,0.0000014723636,0.0012245824,0.9805169,0.014124196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019146851,0.000057229743,0.000054206823,0.00008091335,0.0001052686,0.000055690212,0.0007776316,3.346303e-7,7.304886e-7,0.0005079806,0.99806637,0.00010218562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011892252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000904355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052273873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007588127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004816204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390655214","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1406","title":"An integrative theory of resource discrepancies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Scarcity; Psychology; Class (philosophy); Resource dependence theory; Poverty; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07925118628452628,"score_gpt":0.44048681018037855,"score_spread":0.3612356238958523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390655214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94987434,0.019633781,0.0018457402,0.001234384,0.0023995102,0.00008029286,0.00002216296,0.000029436307,0.02488035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696916,0.00022145838,0.00027593615,0.0003481021,0.00023079634,0.000002827108,0.0000026231482,0.000014734201,0.0019343602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836165,0.0005433598,0.00056893134,0.00019241282,0.00014299544,0.00019062917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889827,0.0003575116,0.00026197368,0.00025801559,0.00013267176,0.000091530965],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000650781,0.0001468547,0.00038236415,0.00021493003,0.000029607692,0.000028753317,0.00032748195,0.0001309861,0.0022514502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057374815,0.00008552645,0.00021501136,0.00018596253,0.0003725706,0.00014192922,0.000015675781,0.00041326127,0.000060201342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002218141,0.00077430817,0.016870536,0.00006422528,0.0019615523,0.00041862138,0.04436515,0.0000018873642,0.022780588,0.43866482,0.113909714,0.35797045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018893165,0.0045792367,0.32330567,0.00063944317,0.00054968934,0.0032135097,0.02963274,0.000024135948,0.0009811849,0.10218549,0.53248376,0.0005158481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001688995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011618977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41857404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012160322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035814835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390823160","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1409","title":"More the merrier: Effects of plural brand names on perceived entitativity and brand attitude","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Psychology; Brand names; Advertising; Perception; Reading (process); Brand management; Social psychology; Marketing; Linguistics; Business","score_opus":0.019390972636544775,"score_gpt":0.31686468040947535,"score_spread":0.2974737077729306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390823160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882138,0.005524256,0.00010333123,0.0036763807,0.0019214054,0.00017907297,0.0000024585734,0.00002032207,0.00035900171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807525,0.0006529556,0.00002584676,0.00084428035,0.00018786815,0.00000663091,0.000002266875,0.000014440223,0.00019045633],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989557,0.000060076563,0.00042567644,0.0001855572,0.00023166445,0.00014128086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990133,0.00031224918,0.000288051,0.00018882188,0.00017799418,0.000019567824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044846523,0.0001451504,0.00027499255,0.00033260806,0.00011024614,0.00019520304,0.00019620993,0.00007434201,0.00019138034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012978543,0.00009698502,0.00014314894,0.0002055085,0.0003299916,0.00045300453,0.00003352991,0.0002872377,0.000053648975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011495617,0.0005981929,0.14990517,0.0014156766,0.0010088482,0.00017076907,0.0022061586,0.0000044131334,0.09653237,0.0050811404,0.04148066,0.700447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014680657,0.000028546183,0.93925536,0.0002648203,0.00042681218,0.000085083426,0.00009985009,0.000056798675,0.00018962791,0.00082957523,0.057161286,0.00013419983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028559458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024486475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78935015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009467041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023934046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39549345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391445781","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1412","title":"The different roads not taken: Considering diverse foregone alternatives motivates future goal persistence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Deliberation; Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Economics; Goal pursuit; Psychology; Goal setting; Persistence (discontinuity); Action (physics); Marketing; Microeconomics; Public economics; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.09572932202232154,"score_gpt":0.4125891705183004,"score_spread":0.31685984849597887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391445781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93892103,0.027523195,0.00039931206,0.01300941,0.017543424,0.00018109805,0.000028717508,0.00004072363,0.002353068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99468696,0.0013670666,0.00013009376,0.0007952333,0.0008055522,0.000016076568,0.0000019344595,0.00002491444,0.0021721814],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794483,0.00031363618,0.0007764534,0.00027508198,0.00022835007,0.00046164542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860483,0.0003598867,0.0003342538,0.00031392527,0.00017734745,0.0002097263],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046811608,0.00021596179,0.0003479171,0.00021273558,0.0002463164,0.00008901042,0.00043074918,0.00016750148,0.0014118716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043648353,0.00013422118,0.0004175376,0.00015035021,0.00041995684,0.00016834271,0.000050980543,0.00088549656,0.00023540773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017588614,0.000955401,0.06554793,0.00008358357,0.0017538714,0.0015493134,0.0077259457,0.0000030653034,0.0029196232,0.022094633,0.18828183,0.70732594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024179197,0.0016324233,0.45190504,0.0003616304,0.00031826657,0.0033865534,0.006563391,0.00002455395,0.000325991,0.0014730074,0.5312251,0.00036612523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001711988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046103865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7069598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005631172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052758143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399182819","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1420","title":"When anthropomorphized brands push their gender boundaries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Perception; Disadvantage; Social psychology; Product (mathematics); Product category; Advertising; Business; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06062016999813567,"score_gpt":0.3259380933747241,"score_spread":0.26531792337658844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399182819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92113215,0.022869647,0.005172758,0.017440377,0.022888998,0.0003465955,0.000020511208,0.00027823067,0.00985074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99625313,0.00039731455,0.00014025517,0.0018438977,0.0008366283,0.0000073533843,0.000017700493,0.000032259395,0.00047146398],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985463,0.00003708693,0.0006834719,0.0002448177,0.00024991925,0.00023841305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894327,0.000070204915,0.00032814656,0.000265049,0.00036620823,0.000027128293],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006510848,0.00019200266,0.0003260971,0.0006492439,0.00022354354,0.0011512716,0.00032101778,0.00012125187,0.004211932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006191123,0.00015194404,0.0002403552,0.00030213644,0.00046151027,0.0010803617,0.00004563518,0.0003576502,0.00079451746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000448549,0.00027257437,0.026594639,0.00020022664,0.00049261574,0.00018081618,0.00046887653,5.167252e-7,0.008101349,0.01275376,0.46761355,0.48287252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011083048,0.0000075478897,0.051799536,0.0000560342,0.00022775229,0.00028299217,0.00011036928,0.000047991696,0.000059058144,0.010276089,0.9358421,0.00018225482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000246922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021002363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48269027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021964728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101165344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400990988","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1433","title":"Collective consciousness and consumer behavior","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Construct (python library); Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Collective unconscious; Unitary state; Consumer behaviour; Social psychology; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.035707419040236305,"score_gpt":0.3221062265347361,"score_spread":0.28639880749449975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400990988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97890717,0.011073627,0.00028963972,0.0017850971,0.0048010284,0.00026921983,0.000006884905,0.00008615574,0.0027811772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969996,0.0005218492,0.000102468985,0.0010442506,0.0003507865,0.000026261245,0.0000043732944,0.000028863802,0.00092149526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862075,0.000036106718,0.00061759463,0.0002811664,0.00022560165,0.0002187646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988939,0.00012433446,0.00030321415,0.00019519828,0.00044770035,0.000035657544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052455807,0.00018763589,0.00032275796,0.00078863354,0.0001387403,0.00042924276,0.00019966965,0.00013049763,0.00089387165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008376181,0.00016516361,0.0001346145,0.00044743373,0.00034000436,0.000789006,0.00004948389,0.0003552738,0.00040498603],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033010778,0.00039911797,0.21518953,0.00020800965,0.00036359235,0.0004962002,0.00031536858,3.518452e-7,0.012632485,0.0057795816,0.08359558,0.68069005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015579658,0.000018911789,0.4052362,0.00012653401,0.00083945406,0.0010768484,0.00014265996,0.00004760175,0.000068761,0.002403423,0.5881628,0.0003188324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023754179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026787226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6803712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042631033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015575197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97872674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401641682","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1438","title":"Money can buy me love: Gifts are a more effective form of acute social support than conversations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.021503832174377197,"score_gpt":0.3717234674891093,"score_spread":0.3502196353147321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401641682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.949014,0.0012207578,0.0017095266,0.013902902,0.009298924,0.0004557397,0.0002566952,0.000080445825,0.02406102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966517,0.0001728088,0.0001319399,0.001200961,0.0005195324,0.000017540779,0.000014042707,0.0000418549,0.0012496302],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974093,0.00039836904,0.00095720275,0.00042189422,0.00034559885,0.0004676561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798536,0.00041269223,0.00079678703,0.000317451,0.00029143336,0.00019625487],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072142447,0.00029772177,0.00074337365,0.00055184297,0.000084967985,0.000033645138,0.00033276045,0.00048486554,0.002271166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006752916,0.00024683066,0.00048573106,0.00046649095,0.0004611584,0.000159074,0.000031027965,0.0009825487,0.00041796445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004698928,0.0018129256,0.1913526,0.00022047824,0.01470465,0.0031982353,0.06835934,0.0000047289204,0.016231196,0.010724785,0.6099683,0.07872381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035878937,0.0015423099,0.9406776,0.00013145452,0.0010241468,0.0028525793,0.0020887721,0.000012289804,0.00031004302,0.00897849,0.038388975,0.00040544587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000072740426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029709301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.749325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107658576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010012973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406410296","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1447","title":"Food categorization determines whether healthier food is inferred to be tastier or less tasty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Psychology; Food labeling; Food science; Advertising; Business; Computer science; Chemistry; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07841075455111997,"score_gpt":0.39607716665049053,"score_spread":0.3176664120993706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406410296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89904374,0.010176586,0.018790213,0.06596996,0.003356699,0.00066000095,0.00004137371,0.00004059181,0.0019208122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97097737,0.0003650194,0.0024512873,0.025338756,0.00016363418,0.000012216505,0.0000038702487,0.00002878619,0.0006590352],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981844,0.00009773198,0.00087103574,0.00026656728,0.00024047463,0.00033979394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998369,0.00014141448,0.00032287088,0.00034952728,0.0005649426,0.00025224415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037959593,0.00021478884,0.0006263265,0.0005498401,0.00008375146,0.000029397375,0.0001846408,0.00020302524,0.00039911564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024604166,0.00016085432,0.00015279315,0.0004977569,0.00008915645,0.00009585298,0.000049654347,0.0004345271,0.000014591608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014590424,0.002191729,0.27978677,0.0008840035,0.008088713,0.00029039188,0.0046476265,0.00002170957,0.016165001,0.0017259165,0.13470002,0.5369077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012876757,0.010017326,0.09636652,0.0007514016,0.0018956471,0.0021060258,0.0004059461,0.000063283995,0.0017217218,0.0011436382,0.8721136,0.00053816766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012998786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021134083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7374135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005738962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003977338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6559449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407824391","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1451","title":"Awe‐inspired: Appraising awe's consequences for consumers and brands","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Advertising; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.062115814668804746,"score_gpt":0.3824482611613,"score_spread":0.32033244649249526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407824391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86545676,0.02290463,0.0018497804,0.034721877,0.009805658,0.00064177247,0.000060706156,0.00004588064,0.06451296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98525,0.0017474268,0.0007636659,0.0109693045,0.00032591794,0.000013348395,0.000002301308,0.000012051318,0.0009159697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987237,0.000082166414,0.0006440324,0.00016459107,0.000111872425,0.0002736788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851084,0.0005497458,0.00038478727,0.00013162722,0.0003110304,0.000111971436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006500137,0.00013726746,0.00042730456,0.00032286134,0.00027352877,0.00008890733,0.0001682425,0.000091605645,0.00032720796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019324904,0.000109452376,0.00010169757,0.00004527398,0.0012145321,0.00019296813,0.000013043825,0.00025023383,0.000009153201],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001655844,0.00029447366,0.049281735,0.0006281345,0.0010557714,0.00009400916,0.018773448,0.000002548386,0.002296254,0.54575866,0.21174537,0.16841377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002410541,0.00030368133,0.0021217167,0.00016344171,0.00013127233,0.00013297916,0.0014543778,0.000007945052,0.000085534804,0.017019052,0.9760329,0.0001365732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004286712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015083152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76428753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000149133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002619619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44749942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408418311","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1454","title":"“It's a tough job, but somebody's got to do it”: Committed consumers' voluntary emotion work in alternative market systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Work (physics); Social psychology; Turnover intention; Turnover; Job satisfaction; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.029244556531178505,"score_gpt":0.39577716702577326,"score_spread":0.36653261049459473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408418311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74375427,0.0023491355,0.0014752335,0.105795644,0.017504238,0.0009391913,0.00005093935,0.000038852006,0.12809248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982324,0.00081618107,0.0009859687,0.007921386,0.00031560494,0.000025678342,0.000002742682,0.00001818682,0.007590273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950894,0.0022896747,0.0011608807,0.0003337493,0.0005908387,0.00053547154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966195,0.0014655511,0.00057267287,0.0003224702,0.00076048466,0.00025931478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030855138,0.00022098668,0.000600018,0.0008861577,0.0003286764,0.000086612024,0.0008008619,0.0003286716,0.0007605543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001184063,0.00021106741,0.00015015074,0.0013285093,0.00048518833,0.00030584505,0.00009939161,0.0009258824,0.00010086439],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009928046,0.00043819414,0.3451793,0.0000330548,0.0004233961,0.0002010514,0.010227114,0.000039997598,0.00011596695,0.012469797,0.62196964,0.007909693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029856472,0.00016014463,0.39621937,0.0017171974,0.00012419985,0.000063027954,0.016538773,0.000019668892,0.000011031574,0.0070074126,0.5747743,0.00037919343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092680345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014107475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2385697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038492584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8607079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412119404","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.70000","title":"The charity capacity curse","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Leeds","keywords":"Curse; Psychology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04464868122383963,"score_gpt":0.4170104014458407,"score_spread":0.37236172022200104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412119404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8603666,0.0037453794,0.0013489313,0.02046723,0.008047159,0.000114644914,0.0000014281782,0.000018858498,0.10588978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967531,0.0010621296,0.0001337459,0.00085361715,0.00022948864,0.0000014145099,3.6040817e-8,0.0000027034368,0.000963759],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905264,0.000258101,0.00026117088,0.00006957113,0.00015118298,0.00020732752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991751,0.00028127604,0.00016116384,0.00012822643,0.00019284719,0.00006138847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015383173,0.000051996154,0.00013323696,0.00007077776,0.00043107013,0.000038487837,0.00035129354,0.00008146131,0.00009005672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038043005,0.000035772588,0.00008852428,0.00018880986,0.00052631117,0.00008680076,0.000014966359,0.00032326393,0.000015825748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025735842,0.00019716952,0.53647256,0.0000147306755,0.00035020578,0.000031300515,0.006787631,9.864258e-7,0.0027134216,0.22458605,0.1210504,0.1075382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003461553,0.000027734613,0.107294306,0.000018272474,0.000023257451,0.000013404612,0.00053250295,0.000001350159,0.00006583445,0.014205533,0.87742287,0.00004880714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002590559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082767627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75637245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038703234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015969186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33154863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415778228","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.70006","title":"From kurtas to crop tops: A theory of postliminal self‐transformation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Professional Staff Congress and City University of New York","keywords":"Liminality; Reflexivity; Identity (music); Consumption (sociology); Embodied cognition; Clothing; Process (computing); Transformative learning; Imperfect; Constructive","score_opus":0.027058936213889023,"score_gpt":0.3215716520087663,"score_spread":0.29451271579487726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415778228","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98491544,0.00058426155,0.0047007087,0.003599283,0.0019361245,0.00017338285,0.0000059296917,0.000026704829,0.004058183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966408,0.00007623983,0.00043842534,0.0024940057,0.00017269327,0.0000063017605,0.000008069821,0.000008402676,0.00015503861],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874234,0.000046400328,0.0007510478,0.00014284143,0.00017994634,0.00013742164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866784,0.00008126105,0.00046605084,0.00023073198,0.0005356052,0.000018501178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005603673,0.00011837172,0.0002705875,0.00069121143,0.000065174805,0.00007686683,0.00029997856,0.00008997966,0.0007582094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008681206,0.000108366534,0.00013583693,0.00038795648,0.00006371673,0.00048419478,0.000030185989,0.00016878602,0.00019160514],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019598342,0.00076106965,0.052372858,0.00015486557,0.0004567296,0.000016167656,0.0010361496,0.0000063401694,0.035159346,0.021589035,0.020631444,0.8658562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023048413,0.000024424873,0.7019293,0.00018159901,0.000679799,0.000020584765,0.0005307215,0.00002331206,0.00069901213,0.010381202,0.28302673,0.0001985289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000052846193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002202448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8656576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015090243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047000893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8301861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116843608","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.70017","title":"Impatience for negative experiences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Patience; Set (abstract data type); Time preference; Dynamic inconsistency; Intertemporal choice; Consumer behaviour","score_opus":0.03757327549946064,"score_gpt":0.3556020847893831,"score_spread":0.31802880928992244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116843608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98518646,0.00070722535,0.004727181,0.0022295697,0.0038158887,0.00021685498,0.000001145106,0.000019697085,0.00309596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965268,0.00005661453,0.00040103222,0.0024478666,0.0001619685,0.000045848137,0.0000014017156,0.000005353009,0.00035316712],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991312,0.000013415539,0.00046866445,0.00013988338,0.00010785267,0.00013895352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874747,0.00010205787,0.00045930097,0.00014544123,0.0005357139,0.000010036733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032039365,0.000091279195,0.00018971875,0.00041612098,0.00011868048,0.000107718595,0.0002771042,0.00005661251,0.00028601353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023605821,0.00007813136,0.00011606628,0.00029802058,0.00015047293,0.0005342481,0.000024209006,0.00010263318,0.000042577605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074533053,0.00037057453,0.079675384,0.0000925657,0.00014351061,0.000006765392,0.00073190674,0.0000018637148,0.0053845216,0.011101334,0.12318005,0.7785662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003576776,0.000030123325,0.31573576,0.00010603651,0.00026399863,0.000025042065,0.002548984,0.00009599278,0.0005817115,0.014586087,0.66218865,0.00026083295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011405604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001011532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77830535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012051582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004366504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31861043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W850570806","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.007","title":"Testosterone at your fingertips: Digit ratios (2D:4D and <i>rel</i>2) as predictors of courtship‐related consumption intended to acquire and retain mates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Sexual Differentiation and Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Courtship; Digit ratio; Testosterone (patch); Psychology; Numerical digit; Consumption (sociology); Developmental psychology; Mating; Endocrinology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.034573466700646795,"score_gpt":0.32418803690514986,"score_spread":0.28961457020450304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W850570806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99454254,0.0036241882,0.00018294764,0.00094955903,0.00029210135,0.00013133619,0.000011802197,0.000007185644,0.00025834248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99796987,0.00045442043,0.00015841842,0.0010827379,0.000032198153,0.0000031660845,0.000028282911,0.000017043152,0.00025389504],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896127,0.00010720221,0.0004623714,0.00019240344,0.00012797647,0.00014880432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990034,0.000033616616,0.00033470883,0.00015234917,0.00022721787,0.0002486894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021655535,0.0001358327,0.0002518015,0.00011699267,0.000036497087,0.00002293723,0.000095280266,0.0001725473,0.000054058353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045323945,0.000118626165,0.000039119026,0.000053783453,0.00023009171,0.000013609156,0.00006733364,0.000093611205,0.000010670423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025654687,0.00027592637,0.5524697,0.000053688127,0.0005391711,0.000015669137,0.0014001606,0.000011239301,0.405727,0.000115961026,0.031853788,0.004972261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.029713692,0.012464686,0.6836207,0.00033917886,0.00083168957,0.004242262,0.0035291798,0.000113837676,0.16484505,0.0041074716,0.0947358,0.0014564885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035668318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012062964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24088196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011067771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063714106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48374346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}