{"meta":{"query_hash":"48eb7eb89e38","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology"},"cohort_total":159,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":159,"exported":159,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/48eb7eb89e38","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Consumer+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1971025310","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.003","title":"How we relate to brands: Psychological and neurophysiological insights into consumer–brand relationships","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":265,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Arousal; Brand relationship; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Insula; Social psychology; Mechanism (biology); Cognitive psychology; Advertising; Brand awareness; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.11195246626516141,"score_gpt":0.30816215457328094,"score_spread":0.19620968830811952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971025310","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953909,0.00009890225,0.00096462225,0.00011431425,0.000014309252,0.000018144914,0.000015029843,0.000006175875,0.0033775622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861133,0.00007456248,0.0008804656,0.00008383365,0.0000059011154,0.000010288321,0.000010196727,0.0000031713103,0.00032016163],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997596,0.00010076544,0.000009194265,0.000053258802,0.000059476733,0.000017768187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882096,0.0006026803,0.00027242635,0.000111285044,0.00007090763,0.00012169572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006959908,0.00012674961,0.00012380096,0.00025527645,0.00028902525,0.0011778027,0.00014589957,0.00056296686,0.0022571029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034476486,0.00018214608,0.00012241353,0.00017589779,0.0006540278,0.0011257366,0.00055120495,0.00057292107,0.00009967755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003665931,0.0038747669,0.33921188,0.00060607714,0.000478066,0.0007156451,0.030611878,0.0020051508,0.4833661,0.013497272,0.001302145,0.12066503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093536226,0.0013988683,0.96477246,0.0000406932,0.00014780236,0.00042438242,0.00525516,0.0038927074,0.013831809,0.008236842,0.001857786,0.0000479201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035242064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062943605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022571029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019696573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008322219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007550776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973681599","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.04.001","title":"Say no more! The liability of strong ties on desire for special experiences","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Function (biology); Liability; Consumption (sociology); Cognitive psychology; Aesthetics; Business","score_opus":0.1978953222669123,"score_gpt":0.4014093935712459,"score_spread":0.20351407130433358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973681599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880805,0.00017144842,0.00028176256,0.0009479416,0.0000256668,0.000014696338,0.00003769488,0.0000086617565,0.010431541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991923,0.00007299879,0.00012638309,0.00011558135,0.000012887572,0.000006699918,0.000013984538,0.000004004085,0.00045523545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973558,0.0014220967,0.00015325204,0.00020776309,0.00055842765,0.0003027026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609208,0.020745793,0.009807229,0.0031519455,0.0013500144,0.004024188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034393833,0.00018785062,0.00025924278,0.00069743895,0.0015521995,0.0030345486,0.00043758296,0.0012854114,0.0112769995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037865933,0.00034971387,0.00038355787,0.00046829594,0.0021291988,0.0017608309,0.00207056,0.0023804938,0.00049088383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029596519,0.0027107757,0.85685635,0.0003700752,0.0005066101,0.0023288412,0.04422576,0.0004760573,0.00851218,0.015409598,0.0027402653,0.06290388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015722969,0.0012285678,0.9075716,0.000250049,0.000315974,0.0026338263,0.06323647,0.0016425276,0.0020596334,0.012659806,0.008114911,0.0001294754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001434661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023476342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0112769995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060643366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004249466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03772527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974084640","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.09.003","title":"The preference‐signaling effect of search","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Set (abstract data type); Choice set; Sight; Normative; Contrast (vision); Consumer choice; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.20292431059418853,"score_gpt":0.4811094195206591,"score_spread":0.2781851089264706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974084640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98127687,0.00029040434,0.004684723,0.0003892894,0.0000174669,0.000019366482,0.000060934723,0.000036532165,0.013224572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881303,0.00007397876,0.0007217517,0.000048706483,0.0000071144304,0.000005259277,0.000015507914,0.0000054198013,0.00030923384],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908984,0.00036708932,0.00006763448,0.00014504485,0.00025246505,0.000077919896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98398095,0.0115445,0.002122424,0.0014137853,0.00050512666,0.00043319893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012518758,0.0002827734,0.0003484456,0.00044217694,0.0002657079,0.0010746,0.00037665656,0.00067785993,0.006731277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013328132,0.00027552096,0.00025354384,0.0003459835,0.001100679,0.0015410981,0.00084631727,0.0011975083,0.00024286786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012935055,0.002323969,0.10202899,0.0013074757,0.00040921362,0.0008077494,0.001834367,0.020103732,0.5055966,0.15927047,0.0018782528,0.19150414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083721057,0.0049701557,0.4841859,0.00024502535,0.0011595906,0.0017101115,0.0019025501,0.11410979,0.12030675,0.26419675,0.005964767,0.00041138273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008151248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088696665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006731277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067784317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039583718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022518337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974651719","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_7","title":"Integration of Positive and Negative Affective Stimuli","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Feeling; Affect (linguistics); Negative emotion; Negative information; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.06406101117796302,"score_gpt":0.4542633843834372,"score_spread":0.3902023732054742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974651719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96426326,0.0005563363,0.008524375,0.00012795794,0.00026151264,0.000520898,0.00012527533,0.00016305064,0.025457298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797283,0.00052779005,0.012811009,0.0005298163,0.00021538576,0.000614802,0.00028059227,0.00015684465,0.0051354915],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900925,0.00021008466,0.00008786343,0.0001634505,0.00046353062,0.00006575773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982583,0.001014123,0.00017715644,0.00015607814,0.0002244965,0.00016990078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085790886,0.0005778593,0.00046558506,0.00031416348,0.00026885426,0.0010501057,0.0002987925,0.00044920132,0.004617863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049798354,0.00032936962,0.0003147112,0.00017902968,0.00040315438,0.00069545547,0.0007359756,0.0008895577,0.00043541903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007725918,0.0021072165,0.0042529264,0.00082828925,0.000107482425,0.00038245704,0.0009495496,0.00039557737,0.920261,0.0029089237,0.0005312621,0.05954931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022983153,0.037421945,0.44838086,0.00057162525,0.0019870845,0.003897142,0.0013152641,0.011982939,0.45959496,0.013292812,0.018905362,0.0003516828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017507856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002652131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004617863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020051816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022238817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015448332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978688704","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.017","title":"Motivational determinants of transportation into marketing narratives","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lottery; Luck; Narrative; Attractiveness; Context (archaeology); Advertising; Marketing; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; History; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02480216238613356,"score_gpt":0.3171490976185714,"score_spread":0.2923469352324378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978688704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98520666,0.00008000938,0.00096381473,0.00039178398,0.000009868497,0.00005904441,0.000037841506,0.000012050454,0.01323897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981389,0.000058897655,0.00081907684,0.00003705118,0.000005572174,0.000019462248,0.000038758237,0.0000061017176,0.00087624864],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991328,0.00055273646,0.000043719778,0.000065510154,0.00012458443,0.0000807113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99031174,0.005264659,0.0027237635,0.0002654106,0.0006181407,0.00081624737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016444519,0.00020424384,0.00007385842,0.00047724432,0.0008383959,0.0028562585,0.0003045973,0.00042551875,0.009255709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016328162,0.00024063232,0.00018057763,0.00025644494,0.00085296156,0.0017783331,0.0015030581,0.00080442155,0.00041148686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000831203,0.0020757348,0.566078,0.0006049392,0.0001245891,0.001362872,0.27423543,0.0012077757,0.015361403,0.046507217,0.0020578203,0.08955301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008681355,0.0006041312,0.7015214,0.0004985435,0.00017555225,0.0007669885,0.23735611,0.004766077,0.0056963754,0.015557096,0.032867737,0.00010313023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014610701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019702222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009255709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007777384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008545426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03096342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980162038","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.09.006","title":"Embodied cognition and social consumption: Self‐regulating temperature through social products and behaviors","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Psychology; Consumption (sociology); Social psychology; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal communication; Product (mathematics); Extant taxon; Social cognition; Social comparison theory; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.09563254831078839,"score_gpt":0.33576016633792877,"score_spread":0.2401276180271404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980162038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9550669,0.0006618075,0.011609967,0.0007034323,0.000026985846,0.000013900413,0.000014169748,0.000018584158,0.03188411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997147,0.00013230233,0.0021395565,0.00006212173,0.0000056195922,0.00000524699,0.0000048568672,0.0000034051247,0.0004999697],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964476,0.00019581201,0.000008879105,0.000047425023,0.000079260804,0.000023823139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991929,0.00034532216,0.00023143803,0.00008593379,0.000074854564,0.00006963924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068295444,0.00020354221,0.0001182595,0.0002644135,0.00030220172,0.0014692394,0.00020464792,0.0004910481,0.0019280575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002052038,0.000110284054,0.00017717844,0.00016866851,0.0017402885,0.00080380286,0.00064942864,0.00050805963,0.00006752447],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014534859,0.0027133722,0.15538707,0.0019239535,0.0006923719,0.0014868153,0.07212862,0.009902981,0.23586449,0.22026716,0.0023944525,0.2957853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018432843,0.0020780603,0.6977117,0.0005369441,0.0005101715,0.0014880432,0.02022336,0.025616365,0.034437645,0.1888205,0.02815219,0.00024067306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005134666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067994883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019280575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038841067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022734923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0064499974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981241179","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1202_01","title":"Misrepresentation in the Consumer Context","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Lying; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Consumption (sociology); Social psychology; Product (mathematics); Impression management; Deception; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.08488302141886868,"score_gpt":0.3256624073556235,"score_spread":0.24077938593675485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981241179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9863507,0.00031280337,0.003064538,0.00092377554,0.000022624507,0.000012399074,0.000012768457,0.00001771731,0.009282676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992299,0.000059782295,0.00036100077,0.000089495225,0.00001013051,0.000003154787,0.0000055638984,0.0000029907744,0.00023797009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99083155,0.005923522,0.0003633934,0.00046865732,0.002036412,0.00037634105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828014,0.009087315,0.003557142,0.0030672993,0.001087648,0.00039903919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004081172,0.0003159862,0.0003085183,0.00085165363,0.0015305673,0.0027462598,0.00041087792,0.0013973748,0.0017990745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024922239,0.00024457675,0.00027912576,0.0003684533,0.0030486523,0.0026176972,0.0029552474,0.0015845214,0.00016552757],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022757268,0.00082029286,0.45763397,0.00060533424,0.0003325735,0.0066167302,0.1857175,0.002567113,0.038629264,0.088709176,0.0023965053,0.2136959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001325756,0.0018571978,0.54165864,0.00065139297,0.0006603914,0.017490348,0.16719273,0.021563336,0.048516117,0.15588617,0.043940075,0.00045111033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00094490574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009586425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004081172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091640797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055669027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021583557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981343329","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.01.003","title":"The role of behavioral mind‐sets in goal‐directed activity: Conceptual underpinnings and empirical evidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Scope (computer science); Comprehension; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Theory of mind; Empirical evidence; Diversity (politics); Selection (genetic algorithm); Social psychology; Cognitive science; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.14190246196639497,"score_gpt":0.49077330042023315,"score_spread":0.34887083845383815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981343329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90501195,0.009458216,0.021577513,0.0022348475,0.000042177926,0.00013741749,0.00012534397,0.00003989922,0.061372682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648523,0.0009514985,0.002177118,0.00014779081,0.000018252176,0.00004798477,0.000024257994,0.000007587292,0.0001401968],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781054,0.0009936392,0.000114893715,0.00041656513,0.00052410446,0.00014024023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9461258,0.041294854,0.0078461105,0.002080366,0.0018403649,0.00081245316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004726572,0.00048836006,0.00043038127,0.0020571768,0.0005418311,0.0038534226,0.0009499762,0.0015676281,0.0031345082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022685131,0.00062331464,0.0004588978,0.0012467187,0.008029088,0.0022626596,0.0015462037,0.0015409426,0.00023398272],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015003678,0.0029657506,0.38557342,0.003539371,0.0015316716,0.00076711684,0.02269483,0.013786782,0.012049076,0.36397833,0.0007031261,0.19091018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026881724,0.000578853,0.6452578,0.0010800732,0.0004916472,0.00089479657,0.0035158114,0.012232714,0.0024430335,0.32815745,0.004924588,0.00015441123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019212415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014476507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004726572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014741817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083683676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024996817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984452204","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.007","title":"What should we expect from a dual‐process theory of preference construction in choice?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Dual (grammatical number); Process (computing); Dual process theory (moral psychology); Criticism; Associative property; Elaboration; Psychology; Cognition; Revealed preference; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2963841047127266,"score_gpt":0.4644670012000779,"score_spread":0.1680828964873513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984452204","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22238445,0.004565477,0.4815249,0.14519058,0.0013926004,0.00016577228,0.00042013865,0.0002865239,0.1440695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95928514,0.0015544507,0.029633813,0.004502446,0.0004855889,0.00018291843,0.00008088157,0.000059261136,0.0042156447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980021,0.0010452713,0.000069394315,0.00026721827,0.00042516954,0.00019081462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98688567,0.00994427,0.00071070256,0.0007558307,0.0012542342,0.00044933872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071223294,0.0004867945,0.0011154148,0.0010633589,0.00075607246,0.003585864,0.0015748251,0.0033807552,0.0074709686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015510863,0.0003555586,0.001283718,0.00090285693,0.006362217,0.010123509,0.0017442994,0.0036545713,0.0011787831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009113865,0.00011045671,0.001056057,0.00011631947,0.000039888877,0.00007157315,0.0004134561,0.0016383663,0.0002534816,0.9870947,0.0011487384,0.00796589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002870983,0.000027538605,0.00045374525,0.000016375398,0.000012225158,0.000023818042,0.00009182775,0.004430255,0.00012024296,0.99362236,0.00116361,0.000009451782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010824647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005667312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074709686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015612064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007980536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037666917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985354678","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.12.007","title":"Incandescent affect: Turning on the hot emotional system with bright light","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perception; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Emotionality; Incandescent light bulb; Social psychology; Brightness; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Chemistry; Optics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.045987332615590806,"score_gpt":0.36765693314333375,"score_spread":0.32166960052774296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985354678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723098,0.0009136208,0.0019057753,0.0005123856,0.00011473008,0.000043299526,0.000035529112,0.000022614413,0.024142051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997752,0.00032206377,0.00052347605,0.00034293797,0.00003246933,0.000019601102,0.000011135392,0.000005666882,0.0009906064],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968624,0.00013675078,0.000007852116,0.000033305536,0.00008786044,0.0000480673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916375,0.000442887,0.00016484344,0.00008442817,0.000072449984,0.00007167444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054341165,0.00015223162,0.00017371068,0.00021804655,0.00042292898,0.0009333361,0.0002178319,0.0005573712,0.0038574336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002053209,0.00013650047,0.0003210464,0.00012534324,0.0009470621,0.00041786057,0.00071554194,0.0008198281,0.00023163385],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007716617,0.0033447687,0.098475195,0.0022283045,0.00067660166,0.002152244,0.023563953,0.0014622542,0.6348316,0.032802418,0.0053813905,0.18736456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044386735,0.0048560463,0.87548965,0.0004358492,0.0006134755,0.0016773959,0.010406159,0.0014996176,0.057904694,0.024862768,0.02168417,0.00012637286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037701378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042388213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038574336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030140238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121611796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012904406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985658713","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.06.003","title":"The effect of food toppings on calorie estimation and consumption","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Topping; Calorie; Consumption (sociology); Estimation; Base (topology); Food science; Environmental health; Medicine; Economics; Mathematics; Biology; Horticulture; Endocrinology","score_opus":0.020071262240680367,"score_gpt":0.33438399751381764,"score_spread":0.3143127352731373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985658713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99756396,0.00010356159,0.0005332982,0.000073321535,0.000013959697,0.000019480518,0.00004533198,0.000016803797,0.0016303165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754936,0.00008091476,0.0017898501,0.00007869799,0.000010587331,0.000016664837,0.000054761673,0.000005145647,0.00041391098],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833834,0.0008130838,0.000093329254,0.00017981554,0.00049601484,0.00007938243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9776779,0.015945889,0.003396005,0.0013933806,0.0008559962,0.0007308866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019522913,0.00049668865,0.0003382518,0.0003138659,0.00032504575,0.0010943704,0.00028846477,0.00063973444,0.0042464333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016038394,0.00033823098,0.00051435025,0.00031450993,0.00054202374,0.00069824967,0.0008031122,0.0011129603,0.0003015389],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03066648,0.0066326912,0.7480107,0.00051583396,0.0018245311,0.00054436806,0.0016222091,0.0064340457,0.069612816,0.0010280974,0.00083725125,0.13227102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113753194,0.0039889817,0.98218083,0.00005650957,0.00048766518,0.0001615791,0.0006557492,0.004178376,0.006449387,0.0007044476,0.0009671807,0.000055553835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022533047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026760928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042464333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035853012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020976186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014205754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990438176","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.002","title":"Memory markers: How consumers recall the duration of experiences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Memory test; Human memory; Process (computing); Cognition; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.06944385123857044,"score_gpt":0.42330572355584667,"score_spread":0.3538618723172762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990438176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99043965,0.0005490749,0.0042895027,0.00022989721,0.000018130544,0.000022151093,0.00006753566,0.000035946683,0.0043480042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983222,0.00018259918,0.001001635,0.000033756038,0.000008461379,0.000009827624,0.000059092123,0.000007643876,0.0003747199],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959046,0.00014806216,0.000027940157,0.00007560919,0.0001272564,0.00003078912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99405515,0.0026985342,0.001744229,0.00069916324,0.0005979377,0.00020495366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014088899,0.00018591051,0.00019506461,0.00064658216,0.00024192287,0.0024758654,0.0004510655,0.0006976374,0.0024891556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017353825,0.0002830035,0.0002157749,0.000590011,0.00043926286,0.003467537,0.0006192635,0.0006265425,0.00029039718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004097269,0.00068661966,0.46830904,0.0007528909,0.00063179125,0.00091713667,0.08919992,0.0034213548,0.052767403,0.0152027,0.0031853877,0.36082852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001026792,0.0021253715,0.8936269,0.00033456399,0.0005189397,0.0013204347,0.036639865,0.01527007,0.014309583,0.022177275,0.013304002,0.00027028358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017927155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014733291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024891556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038042504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027019077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008327007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993888958","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.03.002","title":"Regulatory fit from attribute‐based versus alternative‐based processing in decision making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Valuation (finance); Information processing; Promotion (chess); Outcome (game theory); Focus (optics); Marketing; Psychology; Actuarial science; Computer science; Economics; Business; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Accounting; Cognitive psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.16197710403359894,"score_gpt":0.4948438280213141,"score_spread":0.33286672398771516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993888958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98165107,0.000115454255,0.009435211,0.00030859056,0.000011675545,0.00006255769,0.000015603324,0.000019895253,0.00837991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99727064,0.000054430893,0.002426891,0.000051264586,0.000010008772,0.000022637218,0.000017068169,0.0000049647997,0.000142043],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950362,0.0032742706,0.00017837997,0.00023137088,0.0011124082,0.00016734937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96702194,0.026994918,0.0024135807,0.0014856826,0.0012241935,0.00085977325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075242883,0.00022463707,0.00022317578,0.0006766968,0.00022181385,0.0016579642,0.0002579946,0.00057611155,0.0040569035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02898714,0.00022534435,0.00043070797,0.00035751163,0.00095688907,0.0011980771,0.0010884253,0.0010725356,0.00019273901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007638211,0.0071599353,0.3392955,0.0009706608,0.00046986857,0.000944555,0.01974016,0.012709216,0.08016961,0.05581718,0.0008141121,0.47427097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006459584,0.005870865,0.80727684,0.00041768502,0.0003651653,0.0019377035,0.0065535596,0.05415196,0.018726429,0.0983417,0.0055062147,0.00020589362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026134177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022240449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075242883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044577176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043754143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039792657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998493104","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2012.04.004","title":"How context shapes category inferences and attribute preference for new ambiguous products","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Product category; Preference; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Salient; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistics","score_opus":0.1416467399768812,"score_gpt":0.31743508158067363,"score_spread":0.17578834160379242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998493104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99574333,0.000047348272,0.00066540984,0.00004693144,0.000006015801,0.000006721744,0.000016673768,0.000008392498,0.003459142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992654,0.000031541906,0.0004228918,0.000034437777,0.0000037939167,0.0000034221518,0.000026681233,0.000010098526,0.00020185056],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908066,0.00035395878,0.00004236437,0.00018300246,0.00026808374,0.0000718863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99142116,0.0058287582,0.0012163194,0.0005815474,0.00061200396,0.00034016924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001274566,0.00017895475,0.00024402144,0.00047011694,0.00037267982,0.0029994568,0.00035304393,0.00074138364,0.0047625513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016730381,0.00031839483,0.00018623377,0.0002784902,0.0006524887,0.0013922811,0.00090013014,0.0007234335,0.00036156608],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007592127,0.0016887764,0.5748692,0.0006742466,0.0005222127,0.0016133256,0.016105575,0.0066926274,0.25755677,0.014885585,0.0018975487,0.11590199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017820485,0.00094412826,0.91490877,0.00014857826,0.00036748216,0.00069412397,0.007520029,0.025091942,0.019664858,0.026771158,0.003554806,0.00015599241],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011762275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020154726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047625513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028932383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017456946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015932322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000159472","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.03.006","title":"Might an overweight waitress make you eat more? How the body type of others is sufficient to alter our food consumption","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Society of Counseling Psychology","keywords":"Psychology; Overweight; Consumption (sociology); Taste; Obesity; Food intake; Advertising; Social psychology; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.07964645912712104,"score_gpt":0.40914370237655695,"score_spread":0.3294972432494359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000159472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985592,0.000024711495,0.00021750254,0.00011407229,0.000009200012,0.000002110269,0.0000065497306,0.0000041144563,0.0010626807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990501,0.000039429262,0.00022244979,0.00007192332,0.00000589234,0.0000022969612,0.000010622833,0.0000035879068,0.00059375406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998939,0.00003862945,0.0000053096987,0.00001961553,0.000023468949,0.000019050774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941325,0.0002114037,0.00016891227,0.00005743165,0.000044097917,0.00010487012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043882942,0.00018288012,0.00013208606,0.00016123464,0.0003533667,0.0008199286,0.00010464941,0.000370545,0.0035391357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015569215,0.00013003504,0.0002328828,0.00007951089,0.0005347033,0.00046342317,0.0003319055,0.0003753375,0.0003334984],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050841672,0.0017587611,0.7545847,0.00019785063,0.00028219362,0.0015271759,0.0117822755,0.0004637421,0.16182072,0.002741939,0.001486934,0.05826945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014390392,0.0031123098,0.94323045,0.000059636932,0.0003224068,0.0015143953,0.02310264,0.0024045387,0.02008872,0.002309782,0.0036464592,0.00006472874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010157916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013926041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035391357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014578401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009669735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011839628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002218385","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2008.01.006","title":"Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator of the importance of perceived fit","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":210,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Harvard University","keywords":"Construal level theory; Construals; Moderation; Psychology; Salient; Perception; Social psychology; Extension (predicate logic); Computer science","score_opus":0.09972234728913311,"score_gpt":0.33655612276723795,"score_spread":0.23683377547810486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002218385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99780685,0.00003459167,0.00027871225,0.00007452679,0.000003673581,0.000015823349,0.000021330974,0.0000032407927,0.0017612352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945384,0.000026733645,0.0002907504,0.00003702527,0.0000034093719,0.000011528929,0.000028119273,0.0000025965396,0.00014592742],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99769825,0.0013378371,0.0001294172,0.00016989293,0.0005544731,0.000110104265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606325,0.025871465,0.0073787044,0.0021113825,0.0024623505,0.0015435639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049375636,0.00023971657,0.00026709368,0.000624364,0.00041154315,0.002059207,0.00024226955,0.0007635699,0.0032055154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022322027,0.00023890976,0.00041648097,0.00050114276,0.00095849816,0.0008664288,0.0008935078,0.001504523,0.00018407781],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018212141,0.0013795431,0.96172225,0.00017762378,0.00036846398,0.00020139391,0.009404061,0.0005882428,0.008810667,0.0016664113,0.0002729018,0.013587299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033294295,0.00043732545,0.9925614,0.000032674434,0.00008315405,0.00006977602,0.003270999,0.0010505614,0.0010329299,0.0010480592,0.00035343622,0.00002639385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011903067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018333269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049375636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040478236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032636483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026112616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003106209","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1701_9","title":"Deliberative and Automatic Bases of Suspicion: Empirical Evidence of the Sinister Attribution Error","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Flattery; Attribution; Categorization; Psychology; Counterfactual thinking; Context (archaeology); Perception; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Negative information; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Prosocial behavior; Information processing; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16137319264456476,"score_gpt":0.4010947533406288,"score_spread":0.239721560696064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003106209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96140987,0.00052078697,0.019278973,0.0011141147,0.00007017221,0.0001860259,0.000058167534,0.000075033066,0.017286811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725264,0.00013622922,0.0020272995,0.00017200832,0.000045938556,0.000036559104,0.000043596905,0.000026154265,0.00025963568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95005697,0.023591973,0.0045599514,0.0036013315,0.016862981,0.0013268897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35280088,0.4628505,0.10144553,0.059651792,0.020952407,0.0022989924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040067416,0.0006682287,0.0006101618,0.0028374903,0.0014370538,0.004429379,0.0016227507,0.0023742465,0.0037078657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4108883,0.0010125181,0.00056800956,0.0012224028,0.008793607,0.007060418,0.0041516875,0.0041442434,0.0004979306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004415001,0.002092604,0.70191,0.0010787363,0.00075279485,0.00095033675,0.061410684,0.003527597,0.012644142,0.04917858,0.0012630541,0.1607764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065826724,0.0013846997,0.78722703,0.0009917775,0.0005066026,0.0033888216,0.017571058,0.030928222,0.015858376,0.13457578,0.0062765805,0.00063271896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021808976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011702647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040067416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011552476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014741613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21189928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003255980","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.006","title":"Beyond fit and attitude: The effect of emotional attachment on consumer responses to brand extensions","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":340,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Forgiveness; Brand extension; Social psychology; Extension (predicate logic); Advertising; Word of mouth; Attachment theory; Brand awareness; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.05233002880185165,"score_gpt":0.3475650031702383,"score_spread":0.29523497436838664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003255980","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971033,0.000042224186,0.00015960871,0.00006116061,0.00000876038,0.000007720664,0.000014378996,0.0000016707301,0.0026010901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937797,0.000047655165,0.00011435914,0.00006337872,0.000007127638,0.000006630467,0.000015307709,0.0000019019155,0.00036562502],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991775,0.0005192161,0.0000275154,0.00006600078,0.00015366774,0.000056100962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855326,0.010261021,0.0017149571,0.0007758147,0.00065865146,0.0010570643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017671713,0.00026055137,0.00021665971,0.00028854207,0.0003629809,0.0011941503,0.00016070448,0.00065720535,0.004248751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011712593,0.00018964977,0.0002750627,0.00025500765,0.0007384046,0.00054453494,0.00072894705,0.0013585732,0.00024358374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0049348813,0.0030069195,0.8895571,0.00025846795,0.00044905575,0.0006770062,0.016423697,0.00071843155,0.036942467,0.00236072,0.00053387036,0.044137426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018183238,0.0004629941,0.99602365,0.000021229873,0.000060570288,0.00008019593,0.0014689273,0.00043149808,0.0007465554,0.00044179984,0.0002295719,0.000014933064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010503923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015813562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004248751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020091869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014932151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014213443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003385461","doi":"10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70029-3","title":"What is a <i>Leather Iron</i> or a <i>Bird Phone?</i> Using Conceptual Combinations to Generate and Understand New Product Concepts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Relation (database); Product (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Computer science; Comprehension; Locative case; Property (philosophy); Conceptual framework; Epistemology; Mathematics; Linguistics; Data mining","score_opus":0.07300376290215348,"score_gpt":0.39091348958223915,"score_spread":0.31790972668008566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003385461","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39297932,0.0043701883,0.4324099,0.0110345455,0.0003258693,0.00035849214,0.00019325962,0.00076666067,0.1575617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7924194,0.001807586,0.19913304,0.0006995133,0.00008939486,0.00017713576,0.0001923082,0.00012418826,0.0053575523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998548,0.0008835842,0.00006253963,0.0001907832,0.00024997105,0.00006513955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719054,0.0020363529,0.00031816374,0.00021214598,0.00015459875,0.00008821113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022515357,0.00076004636,0.00034569274,0.0011846557,0.000814858,0.00441569,0.0007779651,0.0015336769,0.004603822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060413997,0.0003882202,0.0010597606,0.0007477055,0.0048454097,0.010632132,0.0015968673,0.0017010106,0.0009045795],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025324366,0.0002735591,0.010922519,0.0012628663,0.000118014446,0.0023145997,0.16741729,0.0037239837,0.031438764,0.57981193,0.008614354,0.19384888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014182676,0.00059007254,0.01406423,0.0008961001,0.00020964515,0.0097742565,0.07846459,0.031166924,0.013753859,0.5796651,0.2708999,0.00037341297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083824096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007688628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004603822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00087585946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006710348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015401363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004793615","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.05.002","title":"Compensatory knowledge signaling in consumer word‐of‐mouth","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Closeness; Word of mouth; Psychology; Ideal (ethics); Product (mathematics); Social psychology; Relevance (law); Advertising; Epistemology; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04374443141528304,"score_gpt":0.31365051999225996,"score_spread":0.2699060885769769,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004793615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9899525,0.00010744181,0.00478787,0.00015866761,0.000012127928,0.000020162646,0.00001860012,0.000034923185,0.0049075997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817955,0.000029786988,0.001492363,0.00003420023,0.0000056035924,0.000008350794,0.0000111530035,0.000006574251,0.0002325427],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977703,0.0008806235,0.0001517045,0.00023611644,0.0008535491,0.00010772738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745452,0.017175531,0.0044421004,0.0020081608,0.0015168559,0.00031215136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027829567,0.00026852023,0.00020093289,0.00049580575,0.00027012662,0.0017298572,0.00036233696,0.0006679431,0.0031093203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027448265,0.00027862217,0.00018614356,0.00020092234,0.0007905324,0.0017007322,0.0011117815,0.00087151467,0.00023348331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036543778,0.0010902161,0.19059207,0.0014639226,0.00029358262,0.0015167905,0.040094387,0.004004295,0.49040088,0.03003187,0.00086234027,0.23599531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002940758,0.0025236942,0.725882,0.00044834963,0.0005649937,0.0033506248,0.016833682,0.03305411,0.14896764,0.061088216,0.006672734,0.00031993524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018869324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012240595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031093203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034800556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027516918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014717877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005420535","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2008.12.003","title":"Limitations to the deficit attenuation hypothesis: Aging and decision making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive aging; Life span; Working memory; Neuroscience; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.29446453410473733,"score_gpt":0.42785292093620075,"score_spread":0.13338838683146342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005420535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7436028,0.0127959,0.10021187,0.063991025,0.0011894953,0.0004951816,0.0009220444,0.0002721511,0.07651952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885146,0.0011954199,0.0049314415,0.0027436602,0.0005787761,0.00021796496,0.00016850208,0.000029549283,0.0016201094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952992,0.0019409953,0.00037206738,0.0008559757,0.0012604991,0.00027119456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9020153,0.073259324,0.009021365,0.0082863765,0.0049382322,0.0024794016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018482098,0.0006300759,0.001147747,0.0011306674,0.00054159976,0.0023271767,0.0022892156,0.0021302449,0.010674937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09649421,0.0004374864,0.00063702365,0.00066275964,0.004754706,0.006408429,0.002825829,0.0026852577,0.0009248261],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005067047,0.00163688,0.21669832,0.001464894,0.0006441079,0.0016944594,0.0045544906,0.011258597,0.006463123,0.524485,0.011321378,0.21471177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027439249,0.00047826607,0.07174628,0.00031697057,0.00016701716,0.0011834841,0.001014653,0.020717343,0.002032967,0.8930005,0.008975678,0.00009244806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027997072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097204134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018482098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012130592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012319525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09774387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005521174","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_7","title":"Buyers Versus Sellers: How They Differ in Their Responses to Framed Outcomes","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Database transaction; Promotion (chess); Transaction cost; Economics; Microeconomics; Marketing; Business; Advertising; Computer science","score_opus":0.23289350444889675,"score_gpt":0.4811013462976919,"score_spread":0.24820784184879516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005521174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883907,0.00023216802,0.00092006207,0.00066888466,0.00006450167,0.000047323378,0.000050838986,0.000007988015,0.0096175745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683774,0.00020248246,0.0004858168,0.0005331414,0.00002742833,0.00004415398,0.000074596624,0.000020944506,0.0017736934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996554,0.0018788588,0.00014836434,0.00024450838,0.0008283271,0.0003459153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932585,0.0038754852,0.0010876278,0.0002729225,0.0008284351,0.0006770156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055590146,0.00018050085,0.0004209009,0.0007226604,0.00058822095,0.004482574,0.00024850856,0.0011982756,0.003711863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026864924,0.00037801667,0.00034435268,0.0004081085,0.0011355733,0.0017576957,0.0014657674,0.0012246094,0.00071270234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064736716,0.0009225509,0.53408337,0.00041004742,0.0005512994,0.0020748856,0.30073786,0.00094213063,0.021948962,0.0145777445,0.0061997804,0.11107772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033228696,0.001078299,0.7179032,0.00017703522,0.00016108301,0.0011508355,0.2466163,0.002455144,0.0025645099,0.012980238,0.014371655,0.00020940093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010695119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008603271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055590146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054465205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024030375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029399216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005880396","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.006","title":"Gender differences in the meanings consumers infer from music and other aesthetic stimuli","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Aesthetic Perception and Analysis","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Meaning (existential); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Perception; Cognition; Product (mathematics); Aesthetics; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Communication; Art; Epistemology","score_opus":0.10804044683544554,"score_gpt":0.34828281018408674,"score_spread":0.24024236334864119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005880396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99275714,0.00012297928,0.00044443872,0.00013272387,0.000014211469,0.0000068623476,0.000045540066,0.0000027944996,0.0064734034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853206,0.000085711516,0.0002692485,0.00006963766,0.000007171262,0.0000057983943,0.00003367425,0.000007355599,0.000989329],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996582,0.000101884194,0.000022555962,0.000057902904,0.00011258328,0.000046861565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841595,0.0008756764,0.00031786406,0.00009291874,0.00019814781,0.00009933233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010200683,0.000203394,0.00017507387,0.0005407206,0.00025898535,0.0014599715,0.00015272347,0.00046637814,0.006381242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059728627,0.00023939979,0.0001527446,0.00018748397,0.0010055035,0.00077997125,0.0006620829,0.00043892,0.00050475076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048575425,0.0005269303,0.46553788,0.00043122578,0.00019354575,0.0014964724,0.07258155,0.0003159757,0.35792196,0.012501153,0.0017706326,0.08186507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000673884,0.0005152232,0.9441032,0.00013884882,0.00007327761,0.0011688195,0.0260348,0.000990724,0.013352731,0.01032291,0.0031760705,0.000056139008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006807253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012635943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006381242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022559459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119058095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021347404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007458405","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.001","title":"When consensus counts: Exploring the impact of consensus claims in advertising","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Advertising; Product (mathematics); Consensus theory; Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Social change","score_opus":0.08051667894085131,"score_gpt":0.42063920976277436,"score_spread":0.34012253082192306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007458405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97304845,0.00036188966,0.016079016,0.00074801577,0.000061900035,0.00013179486,0.0001347354,0.00008142142,0.009352704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974909,0.000041954594,0.0021074207,0.00003979905,0.000024732846,0.000041318133,0.00005498883,0.00001969311,0.00017913953],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9658223,0.020510042,0.0022906228,0.004544577,0.0056025796,0.0012299443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23844454,0.6970286,0.03893035,0.011716668,0.01120083,0.0026790395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048481293,0.0005701719,0.0009618385,0.0027888862,0.0014884567,0.00728489,0.0018499197,0.0025396405,0.0063696126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5086617,0.0006230328,0.00090381136,0.0032308656,0.003334434,0.009160524,0.0033584996,0.0036280472,0.00045074872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039438214,0.0019997898,0.78111404,0.00074115675,0.000631815,0.000990873,0.015051087,0.015823392,0.0050933543,0.046667326,0.0016503192,0.12629303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030219313,0.0018529163,0.6150585,0.00037133077,0.0009021592,0.0006993523,0.013224083,0.21042554,0.008101299,0.14652042,0.0022262326,0.00031595054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029047346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016015094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048481293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019281473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012611366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2563967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007576031","doi":"10.1016/s1057-7408(07)70013-x","title":"Construal Levels and Psychological Distance: Effects on Representation, Prediction, Evaluation, and Behavior","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1729,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Construal level theory; Construals; Psychology; Social psychology; Social distance; Space (punctuation); Self construal; Personal space; Psychological research; Affect (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Communication","score_opus":0.1470319541203007,"score_gpt":0.5143595044582734,"score_spread":0.3673275503379727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007576031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914505,0.00040188254,0.001205554,0.00045774668,0.00001216586,0.000025248837,0.000029504641,0.000013499709,0.0064038616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985684,0.00014967813,0.0006724788,0.000057282716,0.000008781071,0.000016576845,0.0000418122,0.000008658729,0.0004763321],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958651,0.0027026937,0.00010513385,0.0002959409,0.0008474779,0.00018355684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553852,0.03390114,0.005207723,0.0021890753,0.001228759,0.0020880736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005350095,0.00032576796,0.00037861586,0.00061338535,0.00051714823,0.0022928482,0.00039294444,0.0007613559,0.004014905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035485655,0.0003058617,0.000489351,0.00053296104,0.0018226772,0.0010018412,0.0017334347,0.0018769599,0.00030058826],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003246644,0.004165709,0.8657545,0.00020545031,0.0005212127,0.00032905187,0.014547105,0.0042115585,0.0050847144,0.016517838,0.0011840712,0.08423208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015361288,0.0013659551,0.9585734,0.00008501596,0.00020950305,0.00030240972,0.0036112904,0.011775466,0.0012475669,0.020872053,0.001737722,0.00006608257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024030781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019749573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005350095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008431495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060544576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028294384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007898479","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1202_05","title":"The Moderating Role of Involvement and Differentiation in the Evaluation of Brand Extensions","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":144,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Brand extension; Extension (predicate logic); Psychology; Recall; Social psychology; Brand awareness; Advertising; Cognitive psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.09252462689255028,"score_gpt":0.3280617242940875,"score_spread":0.2355370974015372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007898479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99698466,0.000058184763,0.00034531738,0.000044434833,0.000006570058,0.000019587393,0.00001172196,0.000003998643,0.002525554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832135,0.000041969186,0.00093304313,0.00004084142,0.000010360864,0.00003342522,0.000021538652,0.0000071447257,0.0005903251],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851257,0.00069686427,0.000095791474,0.0002678311,0.00029431633,0.00013254784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97346115,0.019322133,0.0034843576,0.0014123976,0.0005391075,0.0017807002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035691792,0.0005161473,0.00030469432,0.0004270072,0.00046315865,0.0017154212,0.00035865576,0.0008297133,0.0067713065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019985586,0.0003819839,0.00020143641,0.00024064218,0.0010816602,0.0014905673,0.0011970853,0.001179802,0.00027909435],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048730366,0.012610772,0.46556386,0.0007734831,0.0003372359,0.0010444436,0.01017318,0.0011574904,0.3747882,0.00750554,0.00041330396,0.076902114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006223597,0.0047450443,0.9665777,0.00007394374,0.00015150568,0.00050524436,0.0010761004,0.0019104262,0.019251369,0.004211163,0.0008192366,0.000055975477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047975135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009131887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067713065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034170883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037631666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022652268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008067058","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2007.10.010","title":"Gender‐related reactions to gratuitous sex appeals in advertising","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; sort; Advertising; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04987992278751698,"score_gpt":0.4036093049361725,"score_spread":0.3537293821486555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008067058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978612,0.0000513503,0.00012963229,0.000019664025,0.000008862366,0.000010484089,0.000023718709,0.0000046980317,0.0018903398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992176,0.0000439458,0.00012482917,0.000030445623,0.000012306881,0.0000074465265,0.000029110459,0.0000035928852,0.0005307968],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996511,0.00016598799,0.000015917767,0.00003754272,0.0001017877,0.000027633205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965454,0.0018631875,0.0009442135,0.00020836166,0.00021700823,0.00022188383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069079193,0.00020065873,0.00015471896,0.00031989027,0.00021805611,0.0006863768,0.000080282916,0.0003157119,0.0039307354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060470835,0.0001190657,0.00012896862,0.00012729235,0.00031854998,0.00017445166,0.0002974558,0.00043782828,0.00031950136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072234552,0.0010841126,0.4906917,0.0004841253,0.00021569253,0.0017746378,0.01292562,0.0005563717,0.42953584,0.001460888,0.0008237138,0.05322386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044973774,0.0016829002,0.97661144,0.000026285636,0.00003773576,0.0013648297,0.0028013356,0.0004909921,0.01549911,0.00046266912,0.00094443926,0.00003335039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021925864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025626848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039307354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001289819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057411133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013149679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009706815","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.019","title":"The influence of involvement on the endowment effect: The moveable value function","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment effect; Loss aversion; Moderation; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Endowment; Function (biology); Economics; Negativity effect; Prospect theory; Arousal; Risk-seeking; Microeconomics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06578126432249025,"score_gpt":0.40464076763814,"score_spread":0.33885950331564973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009706815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958586,0.00003849275,0.001646156,0.000054651657,0.000002939105,0.0000056170597,0.000019478177,0.000007983389,0.0023661507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996605,0.0000073147485,0.00017202795,0.0000044151607,0.0000018423548,0.0000020131065,0.0000066914645,0.0000031750328,0.00014201319],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993337,0.00043298714,0.00002138102,0.000073331365,0.00007894702,0.000059610305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616645,0.03333856,0.0021382377,0.0012936592,0.00051723054,0.0010478004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017784263,0.00026357232,0.00029780593,0.00033623772,0.00020946468,0.001372355,0.00020277128,0.00042677586,0.006088417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016254945,0.00013514307,0.00025661246,0.0002219795,0.00082271785,0.00077507336,0.0006355827,0.00073515694,0.00023989858],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013533627,0.0026914494,0.7282323,0.00022542279,0.0004926998,0.0014258835,0.002151338,0.026505357,0.14524104,0.026046567,0.00065943785,0.052794877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011802802,0.0010291571,0.92792666,0.000026177211,0.00022169591,0.0004136547,0.0005316966,0.042987287,0.011339248,0.014705871,0.0006433867,0.000057193956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005124093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002308846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006088417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025837962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012181455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020367742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011761262","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.006","title":"Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":965,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Credibility; Scale (ratio); Skepticism; Brand extension; Perception; Indexicality; Brand experience; Source credibility; Brand management; Existentialism; Brand engagement; Advertising; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; New product development; Product management; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03913175926418747,"score_gpt":0.3123765293929301,"score_spread":0.2732447701287426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011761262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9015995,0.0004953094,0.051400546,0.000725091,0.00008880633,0.001153498,0.00029466127,0.00017760428,0.044064976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97293085,0.00012152336,0.02594772,0.000035777746,0.000021752041,0.00038464082,0.00011553837,0.000010275485,0.00043186548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969452,0.0014820845,0.00035330583,0.00017240028,0.00095776434,0.0000892026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847956,0.0071467175,0.0024001014,0.0010742726,0.0037948133,0.0007885038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006523432,0.000249884,0.00031137426,0.0027759983,0.00082267757,0.0019053537,0.0006833783,0.00074058044,0.002377567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018695109,0.00030417394,0.0005750933,0.0015784897,0.0014811087,0.0019025366,0.0022129063,0.0011929304,0.0003015412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039248963,0.0014195405,0.45378363,0.00060993264,0.0003037494,0.00028886355,0.019975966,0.0030477066,0.012777542,0.095787555,0.0026507878,0.4089623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013837793,0.0019907325,0.8250225,0.00076599786,0.00029481476,0.0013563465,0.019499803,0.03977909,0.007449796,0.07207056,0.031424914,0.00020700984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003815177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004251832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006523432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006817933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001115052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034499586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013833032","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_11","title":"To Be or <i>Not</i> Be? The Influence of Dissociative Reference Groups on Consumer Preferences","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":421,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Dissociative; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Consciousness; Social psychology; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Clinical psychology; Business","score_opus":0.07388413050762731,"score_gpt":0.33531064344077083,"score_spread":0.2614265129331435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013833032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944277,0.00020838779,0.00021861793,0.00043371128,0.000014480808,0.000004382108,0.000010721017,0.0000028751806,0.0046791434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992367,0.00013782074,0.00013251627,0.00014445157,0.000007027004,0.0000029405935,0.000012126924,0.0000032647768,0.00032311352],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989831,0.00056425395,0.000039331382,0.0000761907,0.00023288175,0.00010422002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99571335,0.0017443723,0.0012494206,0.0004403225,0.000297673,0.0005548486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020786447,0.0001755759,0.00019316307,0.0003131886,0.0006566516,0.0014528013,0.00017260597,0.00045447162,0.003861063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01101235,0.00012155453,0.00018453717,0.0001844079,0.0011381952,0.0007351142,0.0008822986,0.0010184684,0.0003877832],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055571822,0.0020101825,0.71938616,0.00025592675,0.0005883607,0.0016596701,0.047173712,0.00059886294,0.01696463,0.011751049,0.0032758154,0.19077843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012172544,0.0012416658,0.91720366,0.00018068189,0.00020789061,0.0021363075,0.05733671,0.0009046139,0.0033772471,0.008454797,0.008736931,0.000097744894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013913614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017972225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003861063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024191546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017300257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012916565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014483843","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.02.002","title":"If money doesn't make you happy, then you probably aren't spending it right","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":388,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Consumption (sociology); Economics; Affect (linguistics); Empirical research; Advertising; Monetary economics; Business; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0614117158498477,"score_gpt":0.3447917360453473,"score_spread":0.28338002019549957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014483843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8587051,0.006502692,0.005941989,0.026733108,0.00081072183,0.000038288028,0.0007151863,0.000101811645,0.100451104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931532,0.0011671648,0.00058503536,0.00092334556,0.0000993351,0.000009250245,0.00009646057,0.000010149645,0.003956053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993994,0.00029200723,0.00004415277,0.000073788404,0.0001081499,0.000082368424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938215,0.002560099,0.001541825,0.00027211508,0.0011311856,0.00067322823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013192168,0.00016970612,0.0002720057,0.0004996572,0.00072917115,0.0020547474,0.00034846205,0.0005739669,0.036691993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00824098,0.00013565071,0.00017286668,0.0005962524,0.0016347474,0.0015770113,0.00062781933,0.00090250897,0.0027871907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018913788,0.0006022779,0.6879182,0.00076437957,0.0004622841,0.00054362597,0.002024021,0.0007749197,0.0034943575,0.042283062,0.04724956,0.21199192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006415071,0.0006734047,0.8746791,0.00065219466,0.00029699344,0.0011021021,0.010461201,0.0032917974,0.0027818454,0.053395316,0.052494757,0.00010712028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014696795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019421617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036691993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042627737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029979093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122746944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018504323","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1603_10","title":"Forgiven But Not Forgotten: Covert Uncertainty in Overt Responses and the Paradox of Defection‐Despite‐Trust","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"University of New South Wales","keywords":"Loyalty; Covert; Psychology; Conviction; Social psychology; Dimension (graph theory); Robustness (evolution); Marketing; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02130626723618851,"score_gpt":0.28716830719261544,"score_spread":0.26586203995642693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018504323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9622646,0.00052008976,0.009058235,0.0059981546,0.00004060767,0.000016666227,0.000032699703,0.00003263257,0.022036344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934334,0.000039606606,0.00028845147,0.00014420944,0.000012849937,0.000003181632,0.000004160504,0.0000047284093,0.00015948835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99473333,0.0025261948,0.00023878845,0.00061468285,0.0013896689,0.0004973232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9245538,0.050428323,0.012199326,0.007585968,0.0033105907,0.0019220469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009871551,0.0001753773,0.0004948949,0.0008234293,0.0015753298,0.004742719,0.0008420332,0.0022785985,0.003164682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08361959,0.0005550761,0.00037920126,0.000646243,0.0091861095,0.007063003,0.002787053,0.0031733646,0.00022225926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029028885,0.0006170447,0.2000498,0.0004590037,0.00031223963,0.004329517,0.13149326,0.00781534,0.012930942,0.4869976,0.0038346092,0.14825772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020220342,0.0005090743,0.2134062,0.0002803552,0.00015993761,0.0028645226,0.0333708,0.032636266,0.0028419693,0.7065868,0.0068740016,0.00026777716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003139587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018949431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009871551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017327219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010176562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052206397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019530192","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2008.09.004","title":"Using visualization to alter the balance between desirability and feasibility during choice","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Visualization; Balance (ability); Relation (database); Psychology; Marketing; Computer science; Social psychology; Business; Artificial intelligence; Data mining","score_opus":0.30126496269282393,"score_gpt":0.5226896680242005,"score_spread":0.22142470533137654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019530192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711276,0.0001733978,0.019724332,0.0006699629,0.000060773404,0.00011833388,0.000054330663,0.00035930364,0.0077119498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98717624,0.00006510912,0.012045532,0.00008031679,0.000012439026,0.00008253327,0.000024770865,0.000024582458,0.0004885392],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818355,0.0012087906,0.00010749586,0.00014519772,0.00027020203,0.000084766274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695006,0.023262702,0.002863098,0.0030345717,0.00087005674,0.00046895057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037421538,0.00043431035,0.00030494801,0.00041638437,0.00033208908,0.0013305886,0.00048648697,0.00060564495,0.0052017407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034084298,0.0002154361,0.00035645903,0.00027707094,0.0007519764,0.0012919687,0.0006709462,0.001023155,0.00023751568],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011184986,0.008714808,0.14617266,0.0014139076,0.0005237284,0.00077752053,0.03327769,0.013704357,0.2067098,0.03594586,0.0072024683,0.5343722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003098392,0.015788572,0.49757317,0.0011925076,0.001500226,0.0017947025,0.0155238155,0.15175492,0.13448337,0.13324738,0.04323187,0.00081114715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005149652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057112216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052017407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004357228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034263398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01979065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020837212","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.04.006","title":"Why brands should fear fearful consumers: How attachment style predicts retaliation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Attachment theory; Consumption (sociology); Social psychology; Style (visual arts); Anxiety; Advertising; Business; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.09263983007208887,"score_gpt":0.40635371733858044,"score_spread":0.3137138872664916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020837212","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998798,0.000036026227,0.000077249744,0.00012188015,0.0000060559323,0.0000049252317,0.000014789787,0.0000012378968,0.00093981734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995357,0.000041760446,0.00005442502,0.000071393944,0.0000049361515,0.0000027446429,0.000020972191,0.0000014194222,0.00026664906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995127,0.00018907868,0.0000349472,0.00005628658,0.00014571864,0.00006137035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913242,0.0034903344,0.0031449008,0.0005711562,0.0005623127,0.0009071694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015292205,0.00016730955,0.0001643305,0.00031381086,0.00033336424,0.0011700044,0.00019593719,0.00075944513,0.0039522243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011913573,0.00023347285,0.00030754716,0.0002131896,0.0005968949,0.0006143762,0.00043262055,0.001179674,0.00039552615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016622352,0.00022165323,0.9902677,0.000015337042,0.00005526796,0.00008200333,0.0022848619,0.00006700933,0.0011354615,0.00023570935,0.00026004622,0.0052087517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045479806,0.00006828386,0.9975738,0.000008265645,0.000022818,0.00009411344,0.0013282906,0.00033160203,0.00015650662,0.00024047199,0.00016465726,0.000006582322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027418884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034434702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039522243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002454289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015467574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013221562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020949311","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.10.001","title":"The role of network centrality in the flow of consumer influence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":134,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Odds; Opinion leadership; Psychology; Perception; Field (mathematics); Social psychology; Social network (sociolinguistics); Position (finance); Advertising; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Social media; Political science; Mathematics; Statistics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.013273276100830563,"score_gpt":0.33978280606976136,"score_spread":0.3265095299689308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020949311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807335,0.00046471859,0.007264882,0.0009294442,0.000028726765,0.00002699227,0.00011071654,0.00003641881,0.010404623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994252,0.00005481324,0.0003550457,0.000008040901,0.000016460022,0.0000041144563,0.0000138873365,0.000002702179,0.00011977144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988146,0.00069134636,0.000047371996,0.00016600273,0.00019016051,0.00009056555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9491385,0.04235215,0.0046692817,0.0009096846,0.0018520358,0.0010782008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020158696,0.00018339927,0.0002979789,0.002115645,0.000739685,0.002424062,0.00029440704,0.0004630403,0.0028950695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032665577,0.00022291591,0.00019618263,0.0016292584,0.0011866834,0.0024394544,0.0008207588,0.00059403473,0.000121806996],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010298965,0.0005138932,0.8130093,0.00027225993,0.0004227471,0.0005904201,0.010621745,0.010531631,0.005376669,0.079233415,0.001975117,0.07642291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011114484,0.00035511918,0.800577,0.00013222563,0.00036852568,0.0006608697,0.0054752245,0.08797687,0.0017242226,0.09890819,0.0036042507,0.00010636875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043432848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033969597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043432848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009098294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049394456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010661066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021885792","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2012.04.002","title":"Unconscious creativity: When can unconscious thought outperform conscious thought?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Creativity; Psychology; Deliberation; Novelty; Duration (music); Cognitive psychology; Consciousness; Cognition; Psychoanalysis; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.05677706053244605,"score_gpt":0.38878358164376453,"score_spread":0.33200652111131845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021885792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9702993,0.0016756115,0.009127104,0.0012959753,0.00011924051,0.000029539075,0.00006520153,0.000099204524,0.01728871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985378,0.00007431959,0.001078726,0.00006222327,0.000027877744,0.000007447963,0.00001647264,0.000022121338,0.0001731275],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507326,0.0020968928,0.0004250026,0.00075891096,0.0012600352,0.0003859517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8876336,0.084900685,0.014205839,0.0060670744,0.0034905244,0.0037023388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009613492,0.00032405625,0.00068583904,0.0008642668,0.00041802254,0.0050052805,0.000722856,0.0012948385,0.0037389956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112048015,0.0003277002,0.00040927142,0.0008078049,0.0031162999,0.0064948387,0.0023220342,0.0014385736,0.0004877727],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010805292,0.0012685163,0.37855187,0.001208912,0.00076059275,0.00096786494,0.009186777,0.008688815,0.039529566,0.06967789,0.0023243064,0.47702956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004911049,0.0027244126,0.6410561,0.0004865708,0.0002929008,0.0011731463,0.0042995634,0.028077038,0.018132119,0.2975062,0.0054116994,0.00034913508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046817897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034584073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009613492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063645927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006005241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05084163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023252713","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_10","title":"Attitudinal Balance and Cause‐Related Marketing: An Empirical Application of Balance Theory","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder","keywords":"Balance theory; Balance (ability); Perception; Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Social psychology; Alliance; Empirical research; Empirical evidence; Marketing; Economics; Business; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02525004594408763,"score_gpt":0.3284546547226638,"score_spread":0.30320460877857613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023252713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9781536,0.00015934577,0.0059549757,0.0004559192,0.000015623715,0.00009868655,0.00002593604,0.000010343302,0.015125496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974801,0.000104635736,0.0017388107,0.00013781666,0.000016664124,0.00009607905,0.000018054096,0.00000625483,0.0004015568],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973086,0.0014994149,0.000077128956,0.00026389386,0.0006783088,0.00017269765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97334856,0.02057278,0.0033769773,0.0010413454,0.00079815584,0.0008621049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048693735,0.0005567574,0.0004114639,0.0011221478,0.00085123983,0.001662223,0.00044794244,0.001016304,0.006251598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018882487,0.0003360033,0.0004748323,0.0007931322,0.0020707597,0.0016559716,0.001593315,0.0017141168,0.00036912345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018667689,0.010487776,0.737743,0.00060834805,0.0004412355,0.00052397914,0.014448362,0.0030936312,0.018600814,0.063972555,0.0007805361,0.14743297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029431676,0.0040908954,0.88829756,0.00020619978,0.000502846,0.0005938896,0.0076271337,0.016980018,0.0067372536,0.07125846,0.0033330093,0.00007837343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008972257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008272238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006251598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008725351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007517615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025752008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023548979","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_6","title":"Malleable Mental Accounting: The Effect of Flexibility on the Justification of Attractive Spending and Consumption Decisions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Colorado Boulder","keywords":"Mental accounting; Flexibility (engineering); Ambiguity; Consumption (sociology); Control (management); Construct (python library); Process (computing); Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Accounting; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.19941157557364297,"score_gpt":0.4636348922484119,"score_spread":0.26422331667476895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023548979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98275983,0.00014738273,0.0024244052,0.00066477095,0.000016508011,0.000031074407,0.00005782599,0.00003531786,0.013862874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983138,0.00004662054,0.0010629983,0.000104310035,0.00001074092,0.000014101179,0.000043909316,0.000016809277,0.00038677675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969247,0.0017648055,0.00017555403,0.00041654872,0.00047099576,0.00024743399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86326617,0.10290761,0.017760301,0.010880507,0.0014806888,0.0037047432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004624184,0.0005713203,0.0004742165,0.0006259665,0.00091458665,0.0037691162,0.0007938694,0.0019594643,0.01091505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0939904,0.00052737584,0.0006311975,0.0006209601,0.0026986033,0.0038071033,0.0029065707,0.0033853017,0.00040120652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026888946,0.008654155,0.38686332,0.0010426065,0.0013193552,0.002910047,0.014768881,0.054148484,0.08566181,0.18820733,0.005123532,0.2244115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012908195,0.00183015,0.6189361,0.00019838958,0.0006224753,0.0012095398,0.003430437,0.07702262,0.0069074966,0.2839152,0.0042339195,0.00040286017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001771953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015524419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01091505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011080818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007091745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03651446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026774436","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.02.001","title":"Distinct threats, common remedies: How consumers cope with psychological threat","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Coping (psychology); Psychology; Underpinning; Social psychology; Perspective (graphical); Variety (cybernetics); Cognitive psychology; Psychotherapist; Computer science","score_opus":0.09550420526936651,"score_gpt":0.4015056228186057,"score_spread":0.30600141754923915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026774436","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896814,0.0002593233,0.0023499448,0.001302275,0.000023776936,0.00004390486,0.000006548612,0.00001718552,0.006315503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99792993,0.00014414548,0.001117095,0.00015899887,0.000009413757,0.000013257508,0.0000090291505,0.000005192532,0.0006130172],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897194,0.0004951991,0.00003229412,0.00008465704,0.0002814497,0.00013455485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989235,0.00038670123,0.00029536607,0.00014015839,0.000092437476,0.00016185282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016799651,0.00032257207,0.00023959728,0.0004306437,0.0009445686,0.0021992591,0.00034047724,0.0011652312,0.0017900101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053029237,0.00017727916,0.0003901973,0.00018378055,0.0017500676,0.0022507687,0.0019015343,0.0014269936,0.00016713927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001475505,0.003060719,0.22201744,0.0009021345,0.0005993034,0.0024735427,0.29561707,0.0024868571,0.06561895,0.048302177,0.0045597795,0.35288653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002518375,0.0033548696,0.49571458,0.00050067203,0.00033884562,0.0031664488,0.36428896,0.011219579,0.010273619,0.072684675,0.03793482,0.0002710359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044814643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077480014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021992591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003683369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000546941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008884668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030425029","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.04.003","title":"The psychology of appraisal: Specific emotions and decision‐making","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":211,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Appraisal theory; Set (abstract data type); Affect (linguistics); Priming (agriculture); Nature versus nurture; Social psychology; Cognitive appraisal; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.11216205831459232,"score_gpt":0.4599030133255678,"score_spread":0.3477409550109755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030425029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6860108,0.03390771,0.044163574,0.014715749,0.00067045644,0.00013232183,0.00014424126,0.00008299431,0.2201722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922362,0.003161674,0.0025674524,0.00044976472,0.00007997658,0.0000253224,0.000015779186,0.00000866659,0.0014552753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878925,0.00076957035,0.000047398902,0.00011758447,0.00018368212,0.0000925691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968226,0.0019566584,0.0005744153,0.000167494,0.00027672166,0.00020208104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017448474,0.00029833225,0.00026795425,0.00053343625,0.00043569822,0.004103449,0.0002500339,0.0009199945,0.0024180445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005334444,0.0001457109,0.00028297325,0.0005009732,0.003070492,0.0018179173,0.00096133794,0.0013390171,0.00022803547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00089823426,0.0004662018,0.06509857,0.0028051129,0.00039614248,0.0010848235,0.033518877,0.005463975,0.029014828,0.6036891,0.008123911,0.24944027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010722264,0.0004565046,0.24893603,0.0015753232,0.00021752824,0.0011266415,0.017497966,0.011818666,0.006069112,0.6608865,0.05111069,0.00019789199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042177425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040827348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004103449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066590344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037313378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009227753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032789956","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.008","title":"Use does not wear ragged the fabric of friendship: Thinking of objects as alive makes people less willing to replace them","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":311,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Loyalty; Product (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Interpersonal communication; Friendship; Social psychology; Advertising; Trustworthiness; Marketing; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04857950007491632,"score_gpt":0.30274036531799203,"score_spread":0.2541608652430757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032789956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980172,0.000027596801,0.000091624766,0.00018436923,0.000004999149,0.0000029256296,0.0000033038796,0.0000025819058,0.0016653314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995492,0.000022476741,0.00007897007,0.000077478195,0.0000030146882,0.0000032570515,0.0000046521327,0.0000021754445,0.00025885415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995171,0.00023651897,0.00002282672,0.00006195899,0.00010291503,0.000058579353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539465,0.0020020679,0.0013789042,0.00049462204,0.00020264124,0.0005270098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011485043,0.00021879608,0.00020152153,0.0003345483,0.00065256335,0.0014738047,0.0002190171,0.0007811606,0.0047716657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005324288,0.00031623244,0.00023754964,0.00016368463,0.0019489949,0.00089013425,0.00053847913,0.0008736907,0.00025982823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045620785,0.005417365,0.76181966,0.0005413985,0.0005984025,0.0014525708,0.07862183,0.0007364851,0.06971791,0.0073899403,0.0027484219,0.06639389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022044453,0.0014958895,0.93482685,0.00007532202,0.0003701979,0.00094784034,0.04505727,0.002046248,0.0043755737,0.0067281243,0.0037695854,0.00008672407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011601577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001636751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047716657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026214134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016684023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01596284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033022458","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.004","title":"When are moods most likely to influence consumers' product preferences? The role of mood focus and perceived relevance of moods","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Feeling; Mood; Focus (optics); Product (mathematics); Regulatory focus theory; Social psychology; Perception; Affect (linguistics); Preference; Cognitive psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.02056025374906147,"score_gpt":0.2863733121932656,"score_spread":0.26581305844420416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033022458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931329,0.00031775548,0.0006969695,0.00025170037,0.000020318872,0.00003274929,0.000054551478,0.0000079472475,0.0054849973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931145,0.00011822788,0.0002871679,0.00006301885,0.000018621002,0.000011599528,0.000028262395,0.0000041392377,0.0001574565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931824,0.00035437552,0.00003877965,0.00008531089,0.00013057588,0.000072728006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919368,0.004392471,0.0017853234,0.00024302714,0.0009672121,0.0006751051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017079432,0.00020100878,0.00036971437,0.000577004,0.00037532515,0.0019938082,0.00014056775,0.000670035,0.0023135582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011631398,0.0002609504,0.0002869189,0.00030181042,0.00048375636,0.00055553316,0.00040006154,0.00058025983,0.00036542767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043794187,0.0013052091,0.845935,0.00047460696,0.0004810139,0.00059197954,0.005791256,0.00088854023,0.06050594,0.0014463877,0.0013873898,0.0768133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051366187,0.00031782725,0.99414,0.000034820863,0.00009901639,0.00009450328,0.0012313926,0.000928296,0.0016242289,0.0010390253,0.00040957757,0.000029905052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013196159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018913931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023135582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037162894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023633965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0090325475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033153019","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1502_5","title":"When Categorization Is Ambiguous: Factors That Facilitate the Use of a Multiple Category Inference Strategy","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Cued speech; Ambiguity; Inference; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Product category; Concept learning; Perception; Product (mathematics); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14715482868470045,"score_gpt":0.3529718958089943,"score_spread":0.20581706712429385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033153019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9798293,0.0002677387,0.008055402,0.00046688184,0.000025045245,0.00014716975,0.00003831033,0.000088035595,0.011082127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918622,0.00013068004,0.0069866288,0.00014606606,0.000029634397,0.00004428036,0.00006864114,0.000059960832,0.00067194813],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952154,0.0014716473,0.00051037816,0.000802897,0.0015775901,0.00042206247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92055416,0.0543511,0.012694224,0.0061405073,0.0042812265,0.0019787538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073771826,0.00045322545,0.0005878312,0.0010667101,0.0007849711,0.0043700165,0.0009964089,0.0016163359,0.0066807843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10920677,0.000704266,0.0004819829,0.0006338354,0.0017454312,0.004967027,0.0020548697,0.0017785947,0.0007938524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007005037,0.0020304269,0.49037546,0.0012789486,0.00053214794,0.0065526925,0.044287056,0.0045532463,0.23798758,0.024517905,0.0022362769,0.17864324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005274292,0.0017931157,0.85626805,0.00033470735,0.00054774963,0.0052893586,0.012951393,0.034064632,0.02790362,0.052200314,0.007710539,0.00040910335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002202364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002375506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073771826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006655748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010697438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039014697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034578887","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.04.001","title":"Yes, we have no bananas: Consumer responses to restoration of freedom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Stockout; Reactance; Negativity effect; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04370532795642939,"score_gpt":0.3216361349764938,"score_spread":0.2779308070200644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034578887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978999,0.000032984342,0.00016457464,0.0001152253,0.000011321534,0.000008696945,0.000017859988,0.0000060068032,0.001743433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883443,0.000043354063,0.00024313176,0.00013176366,0.000007430436,0.000009995084,0.00002793242,0.000003367801,0.0006986173],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999629,0.00015388374,0.00002391525,0.000042730666,0.000117732394,0.00003270146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959985,0.0018086424,0.0011424607,0.00048746474,0.0002988327,0.0002640846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011156821,0.00023489584,0.00020651067,0.00019790302,0.0004708289,0.0009658787,0.00017331759,0.0005853343,0.0036546788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006372885,0.00015943918,0.00024177367,0.00014522015,0.0007453208,0.0006710728,0.0005831248,0.00097541447,0.00017203596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007441166,0.002278201,0.6920585,0.00075887475,0.0006855375,0.0011755044,0.06490905,0.0015558251,0.13294956,0.0061808834,0.004134977,0.08587194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011334691,0.0011572095,0.9491504,0.00006748421,0.00016437627,0.0002741399,0.032163985,0.0015604915,0.00796307,0.0028602534,0.004421546,0.00010375716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016107161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025220204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036546788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026118584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015384643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012226164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035762353","doi":"","title":"Gendered Behavior in a Male Preserve: Role Playing at ESPN Zone Chicago","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Sports, Gender, and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Mediation; Spectacle; Psychology; Interpretation (philosophy); Ethnography; Social psychology; Advertising; Sociology; Social science; Business; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.04971949556837153,"score_gpt":0.36913022083742086,"score_spread":0.31941072526904934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035762353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99505323,0.000039477367,0.00017851677,0.0002279905,0.0000094582465,0.000006276843,0.000012107148,0.000004073869,0.004468883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963607,0.000054320997,0.00018221955,0.000095236544,0.000007806466,0.0000063251373,0.000010667345,0.0000046483133,0.0032779805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993598,0.00034988753,0.000009475702,0.00006679173,0.00009144037,0.00012248251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924624,0.0002536965,0.00011655262,0.00003087018,0.00007845177,0.00027417712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007589448,0.00027135582,0.00018273336,0.00083847303,0.005504041,0.0019549662,0.00036316575,0.00062928966,0.004317606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009964487,0.00020767727,0.00010490529,0.0003067018,0.0029564505,0.0006934198,0.0015655138,0.00086032256,0.0002799773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013889356,0.00037832206,0.13351236,0.00004031423,0.000011057071,0.0018014695,0.8317652,0.000050928975,0.011256802,0.0031851958,0.0015063711,0.016352974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000357481,0.00030061835,0.09412498,0.000025758669,0.000006910026,0.0008238841,0.89347774,0.00015321757,0.0014938032,0.0002773647,0.009291056,0.000021054955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014228825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060898926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014228825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010288679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006309536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042062366","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.01.009","title":"The effects of advertising models for age‐restricted products and self‐concept discrepancy on advertising outcomes among young adolescents","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Product (mathematics); Young adult; Advertising; Similarity (geometry); Age groups; Phenomenon; Product category; Mandate; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Demography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02783136064890742,"score_gpt":0.29909530883576957,"score_spread":0.27126394818686217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042062366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99978465,0.000020528794,0.000014168495,0.000010071555,0.0000012244627,0.0000024808746,0.000006666249,7.430425e-7,0.00015947525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998248,0.000018343024,0.000049195423,0.000006713065,0.0000011839741,0.0000043764185,0.000019256828,8.7869176e-7,0.000075316704],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907565,0.00040427418,0.00007213124,0.000099342426,0.00027086193,0.0000777279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880752,0.0060145007,0.0036809163,0.00065949577,0.0005941624,0.000975797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027253197,0.00023473888,0.00029178566,0.0004585677,0.00025582782,0.0012476364,0.00029778294,0.000455665,0.001846321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010545354,0.00020969826,0.0005088135,0.00023262318,0.00038234785,0.000469279,0.0004922304,0.00095456437,0.00014489525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005413391,0.00096866087,0.99250925,0.000016484224,0.000058782793,0.00007615428,0.0012614366,0.00012064851,0.0009086052,0.00017880434,0.00006831877,0.0032914027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015058304,0.00060509285,0.99630046,0.000015166308,0.000050436858,0.000079787445,0.0013045518,0.0008754012,0.00048787065,0.00008582536,0.00017336076,0.000006918748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018839496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021257307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027253197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030733258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034942263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014413059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044962840","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.03.003","title":"Some things you should know about structural equation modeling but never thought to ask","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychometric Methodologies and Testing","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ontario Problem Gambling Research Centre","keywords":"Structural equation modeling; Ask price; Psychology; Sample (material); Causal model; Epistemology; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.4069029522542973,"score_gpt":0.5005120825237724,"score_spread":0.09360913026947515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044962840","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004049487,0.007966589,0.006034737,0.97154623,0.012283812,0.0000116673555,0.000054812677,0.000052434374,0.0016446597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057550795,0.04744458,0.02921475,0.79666036,0.05478685,0.00026667642,0.00021250999,0.00031714275,0.013546445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97707546,0.015942106,0.0012138388,0.0017098913,0.0036470233,0.00041177776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8432617,0.113657825,0.00439062,0.0055362866,0.030505108,0.0026484586],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03374289,0.001086719,0.0017670299,0.0018148931,0.004481734,0.008046242,0.0028559882,0.008559593,0.00777874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19326358,0.00048312687,0.0010834907,0.002414129,0.012275547,0.017732387,0.0024934392,0.028671812,0.0047250357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000856569,0.00006465069,0.0019152216,0.0012510286,0.000118044074,0.00035206781,0.008039503,0.00048820424,0.00037288904,0.19047488,0.74030834,0.056529474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004733351,0.00009855107,0.0014738482,0.0054295086,0.000072890776,0.00052985287,0.014579435,0.0021312078,0.00070761406,0.42886272,0.5458893,0.00017772501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011131835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009439918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9662571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034568482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047461074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1784516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046173622","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.06.002","title":"The impact of perceptual congruence on the effectiveness of cause‐related marketing campaigns","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tellabs (Canada)","funders":"Louisiana Board of Regents","keywords":"Operationalization; Congruence (geometry); Psychology; Perception; Elaboration; Social psychology; Conceptual model; Computer science","score_opus":0.028300850268048693,"score_gpt":0.3219714999547726,"score_spread":0.2936706496867239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046173622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993708,0.00006515478,0.00037010972,0.0000924566,0.000008276299,0.000026248,0.000015601605,0.000009872012,0.005704273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957746,0.000026058153,0.00021400793,0.000013967318,0.0000063706,0.000009751802,0.000014404286,0.0000040479244,0.00013390384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996899,0.0017383199,0.00017223915,0.00025033127,0.000699195,0.00024088181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95006335,0.03571546,0.008169891,0.0020842215,0.0017223374,0.002244846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033529259,0.00029600452,0.00029748413,0.00057267153,0.00048817022,0.001918581,0.0003457084,0.00064015837,0.0059997267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03939323,0.00020169646,0.00034841572,0.0003756552,0.0006212797,0.0008459061,0.0014312753,0.00092625205,0.0003280337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066665993,0.010641813,0.78870255,0.00054498913,0.0006513569,0.0004353434,0.01003342,0.0036539428,0.02958118,0.005885919,0.00080922863,0.1423936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015320737,0.0019520798,0.98484856,0.0000822932,0.00020812964,0.00009260198,0.002990048,0.003130888,0.0033563268,0.0022041828,0.0009455103,0.000036183035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088241213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070841593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059997267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041852807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055591186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02007103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050415243","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.11.009","title":"When consumers care about being treated fairly: The interaction of relationship norms and fairness norms","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Distributive property; Psychology; Social psychology; Distributive justice; Social exchange theory; Microeconomics; Economics; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.04212640554415257,"score_gpt":0.31466957384857186,"score_spread":0.27254316830441927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050415243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790719,0.00009984745,0.0015940422,0.0013472865,0.00001966276,0.000022546456,0.000017524282,0.000009039535,0.017818084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999521,0.000018861552,0.00024021315,0.00007658865,0.0000064514006,0.000009123608,0.000004951789,0.000003332721,0.00011939789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978466,0.0077031213,0.00023168515,0.0005050814,0.0013417165,0.0004337655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9381285,0.042211853,0.011292308,0.0027697824,0.0031168775,0.0024807104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008528233,0.0001465412,0.00026576515,0.00074022764,0.0012514652,0.0031628325,0.00043067368,0.0010226907,0.0022659448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053489342,0.0002225046,0.00020283817,0.00045296978,0.0030030191,0.0015300994,0.001193127,0.0013852767,0.0001221485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002424584,0.002076242,0.7295139,0.00021422695,0.0003933017,0.00061892276,0.105075486,0.0017303379,0.010604507,0.050710645,0.0022146178,0.09442317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015717596,0.0004379682,0.9018098,0.00008904842,0.000101284364,0.00027212352,0.038013022,0.005189363,0.0015800489,0.047636185,0.00459486,0.00011907589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035212375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004342219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008528233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013391139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095709466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04510212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054228886","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_4","title":"No One Wants to Look Cheap: Trade‐Offs Between Social Disincentives and the Economic and Psychological Incentives to Redeem Coupons","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Coupon; Incentive; Rationality; Microeconomics; Marketing; Economics; Public economics; Business; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.06047784393979987,"score_gpt":0.3386871999109385,"score_spread":0.2782093559711386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054228886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9115988,0.0003215551,0.0018869541,0.0037097875,0.00002595953,0.000028579676,0.000017808099,0.00001143529,0.08239903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982761,0.000100549354,0.00038004678,0.00028610017,0.0000108465265,0.000009928361,0.000005314142,0.000004625927,0.00092658546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978477,0.0013339381,0.000059818314,0.00015852792,0.00037426525,0.0002258381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97940093,0.014611996,0.002783794,0.0008252413,0.0007962294,0.0015818625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048231143,0.00022065663,0.00030831955,0.0005861606,0.0013134417,0.003872743,0.00032166246,0.001874934,0.009285289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018547064,0.00035929124,0.00029721996,0.0003773653,0.0035440743,0.0021762964,0.0014572205,0.002210241,0.0003983304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068038004,0.005263999,0.30059177,0.0005183349,0.00044755315,0.001990126,0.019209497,0.007651473,0.03140553,0.43128788,0.0060363556,0.18879373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068092626,0.0013854657,0.6240486,0.00020639678,0.0003734755,0.0010509408,0.022370731,0.016078727,0.004743053,0.31211683,0.016685482,0.00025932802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014531375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004149515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009285289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018060851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008593444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031062424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057125807","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.11.002","title":"Does dirty money influence product valuations?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Product (mathematics); Preference; Monetary economics; Consumer spending; Advertising; Microeconomics; Business; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.0813921654672168,"score_gpt":0.34357382887532323,"score_spread":0.26218166340810645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057125807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98386824,0.00046470755,0.00060390454,0.0004125655,0.000030121362,0.000009592851,0.000060804367,0.000008470556,0.014541626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987863,0.00013860148,0.00019843162,0.00005718456,0.000016165635,0.0000035970786,0.000030223222,0.000009874224,0.0007595792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988022,0.0005942391,0.00005169663,0.00017143678,0.00030931778,0.00007111887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98315424,0.009733253,0.0041286335,0.00088207267,0.0013921986,0.00070959644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016390746,0.00020965468,0.00035466923,0.000459586,0.0003207389,0.0020264247,0.0002819542,0.00056287996,0.0103766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028431145,0.00021218132,0.00019218572,0.00044684813,0.0009133701,0.0013040471,0.0006033772,0.0007552249,0.0006340197],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005034427,0.0014721721,0.85841453,0.0006250305,0.00049591245,0.001357338,0.0070514036,0.0018082003,0.021077095,0.011318823,0.0022748723,0.089070156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004348153,0.00041031712,0.9827915,0.0000743283,0.00011607133,0.00029851217,0.00151182,0.0020420004,0.0015635209,0.008255076,0.0028505756,0.00004287073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017263211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001651975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0103766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042999044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000188286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03471321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057562146","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.01.002","title":"Looking ahead or looking back: Current evaluations and the effect of psychological connectedness to a temporal self","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Social connectedness; Psychology; Premise; Association (psychology); Product (mathematics); Social psychology; Point (geometry); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0823957099913069,"score_gpt":0.40484076584142475,"score_spread":0.32244505585011785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057562146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99581355,0.000077890385,0.000107810476,0.00010169106,0.000009618274,0.0000059541803,0.00001650109,0.0000028460702,0.003864142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937683,0.00006366336,0.000104456165,0.000031550717,0.000008251825,0.0000026724076,0.000025873387,0.0000034506763,0.00038320821],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994155,0.00021828528,0.00004370521,0.000071424445,0.0001923945,0.00005868965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835421,0.0072029694,0.005158571,0.0008360026,0.0011558697,0.0021045534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001665422,0.00022347261,0.00019241197,0.000751229,0.00051008945,0.002350305,0.0003222008,0.0008681534,0.0052558165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013579245,0.0001822849,0.00033197072,0.00046917258,0.0009680654,0.0017954825,0.00093776616,0.0012622373,0.00027802936],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025201244,0.0018744271,0.9530982,0.00014290989,0.0002987827,0.00051294535,0.0064593027,0.0009142562,0.008658399,0.0024563146,0.00046446323,0.022599872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002327593,0.00063012907,0.99228245,0.00004380959,0.00010000115,0.00012634748,0.0033237059,0.00097063323,0.00081856886,0.0011932926,0.00045933673,0.000028530752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015606381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027517106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052558165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046050758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023930507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017582476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060807386","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2012.05.007","title":"Erratum to “Why brands should fear fearful consumers: How attachment style predicts retaliation” [J. Consum. Psychol. 22 (2012) 289–298]","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Order (exchange); Style (visual arts); Social psychology; Psychoanalysis; Economics; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.06621672389358627,"score_gpt":0.3367071598506664,"score_spread":0.2704904359570801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060807386","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007753819,0.0013507253,0.0012161369,0.09276431,0.89016974,0.000049971477,0.001990606,0.0005112872,0.011171826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028821103,0.010949001,0.008588091,0.1505317,0.19286063,0.00028538797,0.008081351,0.0022753698,0.5976074],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719787,0.0004236007,0.00069763727,0.00026162044,0.0012647224,0.0001544705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9773841,0.0069001876,0.0012460693,0.0011013657,0.01276163,0.00060667674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027673787,0.0018168741,0.0016020293,0.0025394873,0.004927745,0.0029939844,0.0023537613,0.0064380807,0.06861229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04877278,0.0011828723,0.0011327766,0.0019309768,0.0016948654,0.0024322013,0.0013179592,0.0063050725,0.045761768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022764625,0.000011396298,0.000109051594,0.000040116076,0.0000041579733,0.0001341415,0.000039703045,0.000019196923,0.000028665294,0.000527659,0.99515307,0.0039100596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006196989,0.000081436054,0.003935237,0.000639936,0.000076110075,0.0011489381,0.0004545482,0.0005589996,0.00078191253,0.0027853495,0.9893889,0.000086662934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023462456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028373793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06861229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025640128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004313992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22953099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060973217","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.03.002","title":"Models, monitoring, and the mind: Comments on Wansink and Chandon's “Slim by Design”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Psychology; Food intake; Value (mathematics); Food choice; Focus (optics); Social psychology; Computer science; Psychotherapist; Medicine","score_opus":0.095683158362012,"score_gpt":0.4148151991415095,"score_spread":0.31913204077949753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060973217","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031630942,0.0020048688,0.0008709658,0.98631084,0.009745177,0.000009856162,0.0000138751,0.00002575039,0.00070243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01758499,0.0025951657,0.0023952846,0.95275545,0.020779973,0.0002622083,0.000012525876,0.00011655925,0.0034978501],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.959797,0.027983608,0.002306555,0.0033011637,0.005507774,0.0011038039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7747881,0.19265544,0.00439259,0.0044799056,0.020509409,0.0031745909],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046114672,0.0020372672,0.0016555579,0.0012848238,0.007989627,0.0070622503,0.009199195,0.03478911,0.003398629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14495769,0.00091026723,0.0017393247,0.0015265552,0.029525492,0.014862316,0.0051044007,0.050070457,0.0013198791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097120246,0.000039761257,0.00020903004,0.00033285853,0.0000237225,0.0003567046,0.011468018,0.00032065978,0.00017315289,0.092735365,0.88432634,0.00991731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112151436,0.000113007336,0.00037798446,0.0015791404,0.000065878325,0.0005581506,0.0077791642,0.0013032116,0.0006105839,0.10105029,0.8862634,0.00018706627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020810187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020327022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046114672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011138256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010481101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24388057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061404251","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2008.12.010","title":"Consumer reactions to the decreased usage message: The role of elaborative processing","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Promotion (chess); Need for cognition; Corporate social responsibility; Regulatory focus theory; Elaboration likelihood model; Marketing; Social cognition; Persuasion; Business; Social psychology; Public relations; Creativity","score_opus":0.026611152594295216,"score_gpt":0.3188904159507371,"score_spread":0.2922792633564419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061404251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985135,0.00003099894,0.00026439113,0.00008641009,0.000008064524,0.000008019956,0.000009802995,0.000006547714,0.001072115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998988,0.00004862089,0.00047231728,0.00010098424,0.000015398204,0.000012618751,0.000029192668,0.000010186866,0.00032268395],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990305,0.00043606022,0.000050498675,0.00006039279,0.00037839345,0.000044251443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98242086,0.013363909,0.0024505781,0.0007783845,0.00075034366,0.00023588722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001747795,0.00031967013,0.00026455976,0.00027473847,0.0002216781,0.0012189391,0.00019661017,0.0006493986,0.0034015197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01576626,0.00018681657,0.00016680715,0.00014687948,0.00044231775,0.0006739962,0.00045706533,0.0011355559,0.00018905668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015373942,0.0042849714,0.33049777,0.0011294483,0.00045067404,0.0011726698,0.03886812,0.0010537199,0.48126397,0.0034797569,0.0013759162,0.12104915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003843982,0.0059328945,0.9186086,0.00019710016,0.0004997863,0.00076474494,0.011373799,0.0040465654,0.052776404,0.0028074535,0.00249242,0.00011591056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034422582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025528594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034015197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015728067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001301215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011379182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062581021","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.07.002","title":"The good, the bad, and the ugly: Influence of aesthetics on product feature judgments","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Color perception and design","field":"Psychology","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Aesthetics; Feature (linguistics); Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Point (geometry); Product design; Perspective (graphical); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Art; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01711537268854723,"score_gpt":0.33860545676163306,"score_spread":0.3214900840730858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062581021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894134,0.00010068073,0.0012872699,0.00010333857,0.0000149673515,0.000022386801,0.000013918785,0.000018387538,0.00902569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99879503,0.00002762877,0.00078009645,0.000046788737,0.000008216642,0.000008922228,0.000009739393,0.000018699107,0.00030484435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968555,0.0016829596,0.00012212421,0.00030914508,0.00090862706,0.00012164833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9439887,0.046972547,0.0042302795,0.0014882379,0.0023628045,0.00095735147],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003959721,0.00024886944,0.00023964116,0.00042533787,0.00042852393,0.0024191295,0.00026088368,0.0005576852,0.0042416374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05082478,0.0002658047,0.00022134358,0.0002665874,0.0012426416,0.00090375415,0.00084493496,0.00084406225,0.00027504694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018893598,0.002544905,0.38931075,0.0010872151,0.00040903353,0.000986265,0.019913932,0.0046309163,0.3806755,0.009705758,0.0032340188,0.16860811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024012702,0.0018458144,0.9418069,0.00012040114,0.0001854523,0.00040360208,0.0038403587,0.012022543,0.026980912,0.009903527,0.002534957,0.00011533359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081791956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011927151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042416374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049598864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025256284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020941198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063414602","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1303_13","title":"Fairness and Discounts: The Subjective Value of a Bargain","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":275,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Assertion; Loyalty; Value (mathematics); Equity theory; Transaction cost; Promotion (chess); Database transaction; Equity (law); Perception; Marketing; Microeconomics; Construct (python library); Psychology; Economics; Positive economics; Social psychology; Business; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.030681116520096245,"score_gpt":0.3873318985018485,"score_spread":0.35665078198175226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063414602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8343359,0.0021255028,0.064068615,0.002845569,0.00024552585,0.00008759914,0.0000890231,0.000039178027,0.09616293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963558,0.000115386756,0.0024388875,0.00011487433,0.00005728424,0.000011547366,0.000012005758,0.000007572066,0.00088664657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949266,0.002582404,0.00020840923,0.0004472389,0.0015665777,0.00026891773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962828,0.023164136,0.006290607,0.0030825373,0.0024829288,0.0021517836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007683156,0.0003719373,0.00044285294,0.0007027796,0.0010862806,0.0037993814,0.0005797341,0.0012969755,0.0031931342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04651904,0.00022286086,0.00041295498,0.0006549653,0.0040425234,0.0046515344,0.0017232759,0.002181462,0.0001602294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013985423,0.0006480583,0.13868822,0.00048422161,0.00043565957,0.00082789245,0.024473952,0.008619149,0.010366294,0.68299717,0.001883688,0.12917718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012969166,0.0009325029,0.17329346,0.0003123023,0.00033278446,0.0009864216,0.011850929,0.02047561,0.0029410908,0.7684462,0.02001116,0.000287879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017315026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017470696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007683156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014907506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006305036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040632904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066512469","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.10.001","title":"Calories, beauty, and ovulation: The effects of the menstrual cycle on food and appearance‐related consumption","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Beautification; Consumption (sociology); Menstrual cycle; Luteal phase; Beauty; Psychology; Food consumption; Product (mathematics); Ovulation; Advertising; Economics; Medicine; Biology; Business; Follicular phase; Agricultural economics; Endocrinology; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.024157584993411935,"score_gpt":0.33082335485074676,"score_spread":0.30666576985733485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066512469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99703026,0.0011770847,0.00007581034,0.00018979039,0.000009226065,0.000005460776,0.00016093513,0.0000019068025,0.0013494396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881387,0.0005014733,0.00011230435,0.000059511607,0.000016150501,0.0000045649,0.00009774568,0.0000029323187,0.00039145284],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984527,0.0000887686,0.000004798075,0.000018684275,0.000021053105,0.000021354745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997755,0.001376941,0.00046087516,0.00007393092,0.00007671399,0.00025656068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005309112,0.00013093687,0.00018751668,0.0004105856,0.00024294222,0.00062765233,0.00016590315,0.00027841268,0.0031407764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032162168,0.00015615408,0.00027610498,0.00053607224,0.0004020237,0.00028139644,0.00037556674,0.00033313042,0.00013692988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022824835,0.00033182872,0.9718446,0.000051078077,0.00020879273,0.000101240075,0.00027841778,0.00026973366,0.0019869502,0.00043404588,0.000322136,0.021888671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050743524,0.00009440123,0.9993787,0.0000038233334,0.000027737608,0.000019039306,0.00005233241,0.00012703413,0.000047622125,0.00010406709,0.00013785597,0.0000023604525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036227661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007134759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036227661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025506696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027897969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010506928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072207893","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1601_7","title":"Effects of Culture, Gender, and Moral Obligations on Responses to Charity Advertising Across Masculine and Feminine Cultures","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":149,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Masculinity; Moral obligation; Femininity; Psychology; Social psychology; Individualism; Perception; Morality; Preference; Individualistic culture; Collectivism; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07369839698876791,"score_gpt":0.43370397075660316,"score_spread":0.36000557376783526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072207893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99833137,0.000059915037,0.000027170043,0.00001941424,0.0000061522087,0.000005927144,0.0000073882497,5.19604e-7,0.0015420817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992187,0.00009272043,0.000079801895,0.000060498485,0.0000063182124,0.000012852869,0.000012244123,0.0000022067698,0.0005146291],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988263,0.0007414053,0.00005598719,0.00010201448,0.00018421347,0.00009010193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99026567,0.00595091,0.0015706274,0.00039240866,0.0010854122,0.00073492964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026003479,0.00027163097,0.0002690771,0.00045463128,0.00068113185,0.0013957235,0.00012760224,0.00030905646,0.0029119416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008125716,0.00021069714,0.0002287733,0.0002607954,0.0009080838,0.00038814344,0.00065596885,0.0007355837,0.000192128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0064816605,0.0021960838,0.783609,0.00048454874,0.00037203956,0.00080657366,0.10848376,0.0002647915,0.044603087,0.0013134404,0.0005591834,0.050825797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045434033,0.0013260131,0.94870293,0.00006525377,0.000095856296,0.00032530166,0.042084765,0.00030104112,0.0057370854,0.00030813602,0.0009671878,0.000041033272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002272003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035397527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029119416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043016305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024469243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013752103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2072724031","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.001","title":"Attenuating depletion using goal priming","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ego depletion; Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Self-control; Control (management); Social psychology; Goal pursuit; Consumption (sociology); Goal setting; Task (project management); Resource depletion; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.11519197102148145,"score_gpt":0.4656964741097772,"score_spread":0.3505045030882958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2072724031","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98333305,0.00029851665,0.009877777,0.00029954413,0.00012524126,0.00018770287,0.000040666982,0.00014655934,0.00569107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98907346,0.00028747748,0.009003532,0.0002607213,0.00005294562,0.00022945424,0.000042332867,0.000046044584,0.0010039354],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997149,0.000101589474,0.000018204439,0.000067417066,0.00005412863,0.000043726726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99866056,0.0008162022,0.000218541,0.00012899957,0.000059637056,0.00011600195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069320627,0.00036701775,0.00035023002,0.00018918111,0.0002740802,0.00043256488,0.00037117835,0.0003882604,0.0035783332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002353254,0.00027828768,0.00019558404,0.000111113004,0.000423298,0.00053408113,0.0010993886,0.0009904933,0.00033570954],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070598465,0.010006544,0.0047967397,0.0010455882,0.000078267665,0.00028890918,0.0015203637,0.0009282304,0.87505215,0.012025398,0.0012042888,0.085993625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031876382,0.029561989,0.077223584,0.0005094604,0.0005622576,0.0013807669,0.0012122258,0.018165298,0.82014984,0.032511655,0.015369488,0.00016575807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018573226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002156817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035783332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012841787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039514832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011970699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074224305","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.03.006","title":"The limited effects of power on satisfaction with joint consumption decisions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Alberta Health; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Power (physics); Orientation (vector space); Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Joint (building); Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09001193481324883,"score_gpt":0.3735681785202299,"score_spread":0.28355624370698107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074224305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922609,0.000045486708,0.00064964505,0.0001575365,0.0000063617517,0.0000102697495,0.000020426389,0.0000044820395,0.0068448912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995778,0.0000096957565,0.00018164287,0.000026366788,0.000003703691,0.000008679831,0.000010659049,0.000002541398,0.00017880749],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946332,0.004106232,0.0001588555,0.00032172553,0.0005320103,0.00024800235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90579075,0.075820655,0.006689099,0.0064751776,0.0015813902,0.0036429428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043829298,0.00019907624,0.0003393348,0.0002285751,0.0005570724,0.0011945856,0.0003983249,0.0006579358,0.012897735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033751033,0.00026096255,0.00032361815,0.00024016772,0.0018377912,0.0008938011,0.0014464277,0.0011796582,0.00049282296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023951007,0.008647711,0.70119894,0.0007253816,0.00076460023,0.0015203897,0.00838067,0.005948631,0.099572286,0.017764105,0.0018866481,0.12963971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086868246,0.005230412,0.9555929,0.00007315856,0.00024803306,0.00061323773,0.003926286,0.0069709066,0.008678453,0.015333194,0.0023934024,0.00007134379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053003797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007457482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012897735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035888766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031040033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043147206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076389556","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1501_10","title":"The Ties That Bind: Measuring the Strength of Consumers’ Emotional Attachments to Brands","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2608,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Discriminant validity; Psychology; Scale (ratio); Extant taxon; Social psychology; Internal consistency; Convergent validity; Consistency (knowledge bases); Predictive validity; Investment (military); Consumption (sociology); External validity; Marketing; Developmental psychology; Business; Psychometrics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05960238984683582,"score_gpt":0.32141644977097195,"score_spread":0.26181405992413614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076389556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98616844,0.00011752255,0.001924019,0.00016963805,0.000028763632,0.00007297196,0.00006670381,0.00001091302,0.011440979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950682,0.00017760062,0.003038051,0.00012398993,0.000024387191,0.00009053719,0.000107190004,0.000005420215,0.0013645868],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985404,0.00061737176,0.00012567261,0.00008089911,0.00051952037,0.00011614761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99128425,0.0041039274,0.0022663618,0.0005571277,0.00093781,0.0008505462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026316752,0.0002927037,0.0001845722,0.0010932904,0.00073616224,0.001280992,0.00034554396,0.00085051014,0.0029031136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013968774,0.0003335639,0.00033942133,0.0007132466,0.0008454838,0.0012132464,0.0016220222,0.0011642305,0.00036875324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008445748,0.0017185183,0.80699617,0.00035297888,0.0005045662,0.00037146357,0.02446533,0.0007148133,0.018036734,0.005275649,0.0027706278,0.13794865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033588534,0.00051075075,0.9782382,0.00006393746,0.00013661302,0.0003971257,0.010150848,0.0016788625,0.0022488264,0.003049333,0.003419052,0.000072731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007841756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001708758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029031136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040586578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024771586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013917804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077209349","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.04.005","title":"Asymmetric consequences of radical innovations on category representations of competing brands","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Core (optical fiber); Competition (biology); Preference; Business; Perception; Psychology; Marketing; Cognition; Advertising; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09561286280030337,"score_gpt":0.36214116147901665,"score_spread":0.2665282986787133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077209349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808506,0.00003713212,0.005524081,0.00015513306,0.000014160383,0.000016622591,0.000028863471,0.000020915839,0.013352573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925905,0.000008985048,0.0005243247,0.000018778544,0.000003495191,0.0000035294306,0.000013508803,0.000004167964,0.00016420516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800044,0.0006125112,0.00006847221,0.00022889419,0.00083432737,0.00025529173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98788863,0.0071931137,0.0016758209,0.0014112116,0.0013737603,0.0004574585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021520292,0.00023403048,0.00023876718,0.00094963325,0.0004410023,0.002575282,0.0004643228,0.0010260791,0.005461652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01742156,0.00021919279,0.00038698444,0.00048459356,0.0018774103,0.0022816067,0.0018477708,0.0010796202,0.00017951668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033869091,0.00100723,0.21182734,0.0005068096,0.0003331952,0.0015325211,0.022297423,0.022340162,0.1731972,0.32222667,0.0020432163,0.23930128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012409686,0.0009268394,0.48528823,0.000098640936,0.00028815024,0.00086402183,0.009419964,0.081267245,0.030566122,0.3865795,0.004347109,0.00023001885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012146299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010047087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005461652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010108944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026129544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018271089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081489660","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.07.003","title":"The flip side of vanity sizing: How consumers respond to and compensate for larger than expected clothing sizes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Sizing; Consumption (sociology); Marketing; Advertising; Business; Work (physics); Sociology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.04288231235800721,"score_gpt":0.3050404051013811,"score_spread":0.26215809274337387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081489660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923591,0.00003539593,0.0010364258,0.00045485594,0.000015114553,0.00001220347,0.000008978096,0.000012732987,0.0060651647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822444,0.000030491014,0.00068895996,0.0001657892,0.000004474993,0.0000062546765,0.000012155468,0.000007998442,0.00085941143],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994599,0.00026016444,0.000015440339,0.00006780836,0.0001269202,0.0000697404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982962,0.00075810566,0.0003503301,0.0001934273,0.00022937334,0.0001725786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013019094,0.00016540781,0.00016308234,0.00024730148,0.0005027161,0.0019538733,0.00028023904,0.00092932786,0.004490985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074074585,0.00017646106,0.00022116321,0.00014475288,0.00094507815,0.0011514752,0.0006205033,0.0009181236,0.0004133788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026461945,0.0016004685,0.51481587,0.0004111715,0.0002563371,0.001601774,0.07852839,0.0044552702,0.123510875,0.02298234,0.0064380825,0.2427532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012432513,0.0016428115,0.81652945,0.00014640953,0.00016975949,0.00090477284,0.09875526,0.022315273,0.011754339,0.032304272,0.015180149,0.00017320429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010859268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015145318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004490985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033715653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002553889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015023768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082345242","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.03.007","title":"Social identity threat and consumer preferences","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Social identity theory; Feeling; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Threatened species; Social identity approach; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Social group; Business; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07093394578664439,"score_gpt":0.44565681739673063,"score_spread":0.3747228716100862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082345242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949752,0.000098529636,0.000052235057,0.00013443588,0.000004303199,0.0000039071706,0.000011762795,0.0000012557347,0.0047183605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994517,0.000045123365,0.000049002767,0.00003921033,0.0000034130373,0.0000024426029,0.000016844784,0.0000010730446,0.00039109364],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956745,0.0002185449,0.000020034038,0.000030441675,0.00011980847,0.000043800323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956721,0.002342504,0.0010502485,0.00019689352,0.00020982466,0.00052850816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010913787,0.00013255946,0.00015256192,0.0004560789,0.00041358787,0.0013574454,0.00011895572,0.0004962464,0.0092215175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051158452,0.000108769476,0.00021041567,0.00026881634,0.0004375323,0.0004417426,0.0005093667,0.00066730176,0.00032483047],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026061903,0.0022145284,0.93663687,0.00014099038,0.00024945222,0.00083478645,0.0051979898,0.00046686016,0.0056738853,0.006524962,0.0011174162,0.038336035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072249124,0.00058995915,0.9843336,0.000048000307,0.00007102583,0.0005433046,0.0048582223,0.0016127895,0.00077022373,0.0049024466,0.0021660891,0.000032053256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009641732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001311119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0092215175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026721135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017895388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0308491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085016700","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1101_1","title":"Low‐Involvement Learning: Repetition and Coherence in Familiarity and Belief","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Repetition (rhetorical device); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Feature (linguistics); Linguistics","score_opus":0.0359178917854726,"score_gpt":0.36591307208319573,"score_spread":0.3299951802977231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085016700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99365246,0.00010320315,0.0020242957,0.00013139533,0.0000018650196,0.000012121484,0.000012012608,0.000010242594,0.004052439],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991167,0.000026343218,0.0005358021,0.000025184117,0.0000055944506,0.000007715786,0.000013118087,0.0000034395878,0.0002660852],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804026,0.0009336642,0.00008588476,0.00031833316,0.0004585108,0.00016337172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93691516,0.046467487,0.009646023,0.0040367874,0.0015263906,0.0014082127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002496805,0.0001836376,0.00030271412,0.0005910644,0.00032411714,0.0015289569,0.00044562708,0.00076995924,0.0037216698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03219823,0.00035905003,0.00026925086,0.0004469489,0.0019413086,0.0022476257,0.001387898,0.0014640981,0.000252877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022387882,0.0027284129,0.7476584,0.00033002073,0.0003556301,0.0008380121,0.02974774,0.0033291487,0.05196186,0.020991785,0.00046212564,0.13935806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010134447,0.001139491,0.96684957,0.000038164635,0.00010651055,0.0005155628,0.0019529954,0.00451753,0.004012728,0.019929778,0.00078687444,0.000049437815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016463373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016288195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037216698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006257405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033475185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013204515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085541946","doi":"10.1207/s15327663jcp1504_5","title":"Three Rs of Interpersonal Consumer Guilt: Relationship, Reciprocity, Reparation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Psychology; Social connectedness; Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Interpersonal relationship","score_opus":0.08930811266270203,"score_gpt":0.4131567421569822,"score_spread":0.32384862949428017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085541946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8914738,0.0037544884,0.012899478,0.005599351,0.00012380215,0.00016259648,0.00014544839,0.00008213361,0.08575893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972007,0.0004467766,0.0013469509,0.00018042886,0.00004362658,0.00008491459,0.000039713133,0.000008231236,0.000648531],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960945,0.0025342612,0.00017137197,0.00027398564,0.0006588326,0.0002670414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9564439,0.023843158,0.012503547,0.0025308868,0.002440581,0.0022379495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037845566,0.0003675675,0.00033525264,0.0011705166,0.0013881689,0.0027800433,0.0005971865,0.0016005604,0.004287353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03836403,0.00032542838,0.0004182507,0.0005724293,0.0054175984,0.0028167244,0.0030929556,0.0029535536,0.0003049803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016978219,0.0015652319,0.51378745,0.0010935002,0.00048040054,0.0030378338,0.041944962,0.00261335,0.0046888874,0.21150203,0.0046833926,0.21290511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016492946,0.0011397531,0.79971683,0.0006522639,0.0003747662,0.005951259,0.033208042,0.0063675367,0.0019195324,0.13541444,0.014861605,0.00022908366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001036965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013552648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004287353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001296644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011496784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020014882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086279032","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.08.005","title":"The role of computational ease on the decision to spend loyalty program points","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty program; Loyalty; Point (geometry); Cash; Marketing; Function (biology); Point of sale; Currency; Advertising; Computer science; Microeconomics; Business; Loyalty business model; Economics; Finance; Mathematics; Monetary economics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.10265426817800227,"score_gpt":0.473280398755049,"score_spread":0.37062613057704674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086279032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945609,0.000040857736,0.00046474277,0.00015724091,0.0000043391433,0.000011462383,0.000026260659,0.000006539532,0.0047276155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992811,0.000024908511,0.00031729715,0.000030022571,0.000004580605,0.0000050506983,0.000021761567,0.0000070499377,0.0003083055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986981,0.00076871825,0.000083559156,0.00013113648,0.00015330456,0.00016503852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95518047,0.03540915,0.00447649,0.0017178012,0.001047301,0.002168672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019918573,0.00023744752,0.00025273673,0.00036873392,0.00041418598,0.0024052707,0.0003238561,0.0006424852,0.010468172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03104594,0.00020942811,0.00026766266,0.00027897305,0.00085516577,0.0013144466,0.0011159095,0.0011800841,0.0004199128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008812377,0.0041507026,0.815805,0.00044711417,0.00049740076,0.0013820378,0.004805154,0.016089993,0.028905941,0.018696154,0.0019380539,0.09847001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028866957,0.0010283834,0.94226253,0.00010473211,0.00029098635,0.000500027,0.0029727619,0.031994708,0.0038772416,0.013770278,0.002758875,0.00015085223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018006183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024490382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010468172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004909442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035006978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035019577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088575717","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.08.003","title":"Building a science of spending: Lessons from the past and directions for the future","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Experiential learning; Yield (engineering); Consumption (sociology); Marketing; Psychology; Economics; Sociology; Social science; Social psychology; Business; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.04460526341083141,"score_gpt":0.34769701349517734,"score_spread":0.3030917500843459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088575717","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015935604,0.27049908,0.014109712,0.66147333,0.004031586,0.000046883826,0.00033484944,0.000100930934,0.033468064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4974416,0.4089421,0.028165657,0.044892155,0.011934522,0.00031495927,0.0003645072,0.0001500757,0.0077943434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968773,0.0017736361,0.00012683756,0.00039216355,0.0005634271,0.00026665884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621644,0.027034212,0.0012967848,0.0025551359,0.004152908,0.0027966204],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0131950835,0.00092281174,0.0015521707,0.0035271219,0.0027809858,0.00865386,0.0025860735,0.005436454,0.0117970165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016391428,0.00037690907,0.00082815695,0.00477473,0.024420954,0.023469629,0.003983509,0.01077172,0.0012488479],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014332499,0.00031024788,0.0028052372,0.0012500403,0.000040969495,0.00013615678,0.00348126,0.0009872802,0.00019749237,0.8406685,0.03448583,0.11549367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012572988,0.000049598686,0.0021162208,0.0013064231,0.000013458241,0.00007352244,0.006367538,0.00080087176,0.0001250741,0.89217144,0.09692049,0.0000428763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072080507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076716626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060449657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063764974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06978309},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088611686","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.03.005","title":"“I'd like to be that attractive, but at least I'm smart”: How exposure to ideal advertising models motivates improved decision‐making","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Compensation (psychology); Coping (psychology); Ideal (ethics); Social psychology; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Cognitive psychology; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.09091548944613807,"score_gpt":0.40432082313193574,"score_spread":0.31340533368579765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088611686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916911,0.000038228533,0.0011374776,0.0005811995,0.000028497196,0.000024968118,0.000011109202,0.00002547626,0.006461974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964252,0.00005246726,0.0016651298,0.00027034388,0.000008199296,0.000032788175,0.000022501505,0.000011823336,0.0015115263],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934345,0.00038577383,0.000017461438,0.00007067655,0.00011784994,0.00006471089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975268,0.0011814884,0.0004385887,0.0002796659,0.00013353805,0.00043991389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018743532,0.00020000545,0.00022827128,0.00018085058,0.0005863872,0.0015578476,0.00037565554,0.0006577781,0.0050597317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006565752,0.00019422131,0.00024335766,0.00013587675,0.0007149063,0.00088035,0.0005601595,0.0013529242,0.0005303558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010044495,0.058404826,0.31911653,0.0012984726,0.00081005116,0.0011737695,0.046969835,0.009295168,0.09337804,0.058783993,0.023675771,0.37704903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002383752,0.016598687,0.66747284,0.0005909334,0.0015805212,0.0012967134,0.030553099,0.08200479,0.03338453,0.100633726,0.062979154,0.0005212409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000598314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010434341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050597317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039919655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004221689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016926467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089898254","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2011.03.003","title":"Contrasting rule‐based and similarity‐based category learning: The effects of mood and prior knowledge on ambiguous categorization","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Product (mathematics); Feature (linguistics); Product category; Mood; Concept learning; Cognitive psychology; Phenomenon; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.026658086190679872,"score_gpt":0.30167814781957464,"score_spread":0.27502006162889475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089898254","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971476,0.00003894461,0.0005594018,0.000052903026,0.0000053004255,0.000008685418,0.000015240939,0.000004585412,0.002167314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916005,0.000026111067,0.0005179222,0.000033575237,0.0000049228743,0.000010047588,0.000018743745,0.0000073806864,0.000221253],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980584,0.00088732527,0.000101862286,0.00035155393,0.0004919347,0.00010892455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95540375,0.03501649,0.0038663836,0.0029458925,0.0015607352,0.0012066582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002798665,0.0001806107,0.00037829188,0.00035610847,0.00027747167,0.001531498,0.00040050075,0.0005002231,0.0025596567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03132732,0.00037352776,0.0002006417,0.00018249707,0.00094526727,0.0007900319,0.00087120384,0.0010298544,0.00025910835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010192527,0.004698199,0.40514293,0.00043087328,0.0004822088,0.000773673,0.010086101,0.0031764104,0.44155398,0.005257061,0.0008306385,0.11737538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018614023,0.0014788959,0.9520797,0.00004994869,0.00020409336,0.00040279556,0.0012644765,0.009484632,0.02852853,0.00558771,0.0006518002,0.00008124547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010674177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016816445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002798665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042787875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027645665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014800906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090492799","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2014.03.004","title":"Evidence for two facets of pride in consumption: Findings from luxury brands","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":198,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pride; Feeling; Consumption (sociology); Narcissism; Psychology; Social psychology; Advertising; Aesthetics; Business; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.16964559068381432,"score_gpt":0.4620356338567443,"score_spread":0.29239004317292994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090492799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980551,0.000071766364,0.00010078205,0.00006100544,0.000002165161,0.000004178419,0.000017074526,9.779101e-7,0.0016869658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996245,0.00005412957,0.000070505615,0.000043100783,0.000004361518,0.0000047342883,0.000022601367,0.0000022277115,0.00017387929],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913776,0.00033071576,0.000051868,0.00016732789,0.00021508164,0.00009720725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809575,0.009575109,0.0044634813,0.0023985372,0.001239795,0.0013656683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027229309,0.00020848634,0.0004539756,0.000991308,0.0008367853,0.0018648241,0.0004787835,0.0009288321,0.0047714845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013321995,0.00045894025,0.00034513028,0.00071596797,0.0022088333,0.00089716195,0.0022283334,0.0013393748,0.00036571044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011763009,0.0006400755,0.9539282,0.00020040348,0.00023746652,0.0003395846,0.022286354,0.00011053176,0.005440089,0.002582729,0.00024177539,0.012816535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018407278,0.00011237039,0.9930131,0.000024993962,0.00005273097,0.00022834886,0.0042777825,0.00017795633,0.0004876016,0.0011010157,0.0004902818,0.00001542385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013559154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015882356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047714845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002747136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025744617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015962183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092942349","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.008","title":"Dual process theory and the context of choice: Comments on Dhar and Gorlin","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Heuristics; Normative; Psychology; Dual (grammatical number); Variety (cybernetics); Differential (mechanical device); Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Differential effects; Cognitive psychology; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Social psychology; Epistemology; Positive economics; Cognitive science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Moral reasoning; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09028027782625299,"score_gpt":0.4553739622883071,"score_spread":0.36509368446205415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092942349","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009883305,0.015754825,0.0007840791,0.9747565,0.003281,0.0000094747975,0.000039183356,0.00001764395,0.0043690107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11517937,0.033741597,0.0044111586,0.79229313,0.042067003,0.00031699275,0.000067147026,0.00013639865,0.011787199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99320084,0.004100557,0.00030212506,0.0010004704,0.0011482417,0.00024780966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94404125,0.05058428,0.00076835573,0.0009815018,0.0030322156,0.0005924757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015264189,0.0011495589,0.00215735,0.0016672718,0.004709595,0.0060303174,0.0069970703,0.022061761,0.004985597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0313419,0.0007117487,0.001303348,0.002288464,0.024516296,0.02051528,0.004647571,0.02991798,0.0017879647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085957494,0.000044073317,0.0002589234,0.00019680707,0.000016291835,0.00035718357,0.0024236098,0.0004532818,0.00007928319,0.68726146,0.30235636,0.0064667477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106257685,0.0000439703,0.00057010754,0.00065395545,0.00001758531,0.00024967,0.0018590261,0.0015580665,0.00016452208,0.7146934,0.27998233,0.0001012092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00913626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005102207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022061761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062039844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026644813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08072567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151058362","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2009.05.013","title":"Perceiving images and telling tales: A visual and verbal analysis of the meaning of the internet","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metaphor; Visual rhetoric; Psychology; Perception; Argument (complex analysis); Meaning (existential); Abstraction; Cognitive psychology; Rhetoric; Construct (python library); Narrative; The Internet; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.017110297910438627,"score_gpt":0.3330713411340374,"score_spread":0.3159610432235988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151058362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9341632,0.0007076051,0.021889014,0.0010467983,0.00006184694,0.000050238123,0.00012658224,0.00009233774,0.041862313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953774,0.00015431001,0.0030362185,0.000064866,0.000013363011,0.000020704047,0.00002747909,0.000028210798,0.001277311],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995436,0.00028808007,0.000010850681,0.000028146673,0.000091290756,0.000038076778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969932,0.0024906767,0.00021167439,0.00009013981,0.00014901068,0.00006526814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000705991,0.00025365746,0.00013116894,0.00155321,0.0008234548,0.0035226988,0.0003599157,0.00063182245,0.0035349976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005979117,0.0001386479,0.0001661468,0.0007065904,0.0037466164,0.0029287112,0.0014101758,0.0007923466,0.00018468116],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040520154,0.00007012753,0.0049045365,0.00073166954,0.000035796973,0.0018476335,0.808785,0.0010058471,0.04120916,0.082695894,0.0023520174,0.05595707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000615921,0.0002572194,0.023840982,0.00053786725,0.000062462954,0.0024794955,0.8158338,0.0088328775,0.013347211,0.074792214,0.059822053,0.00013224228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091327267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008953916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035349976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052705774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023525198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01182574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2157258311","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2012.02.002","title":"Self‐regulatory strength amplification through selective information processing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Self-control; Psychology; Consumption (sociology); Control (management); Regulatory focus theory; Focus (optics); Information processing; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06070291748348211,"score_gpt":0.4284846270278583,"score_spread":0.36778170954437617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2157258311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96343905,0.00018222071,0.025340749,0.0004291576,0.000023151879,0.000069833986,0.000023431086,0.00007476441,0.010417622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935307,0.00006310207,0.0057319473,0.000103925566,0.0000126543155,0.000035155434,0.000010073527,0.0000076229494,0.0005049319],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995919,0.00013476657,0.000020491432,0.00008682135,0.00011659637,0.00004951335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976962,0.001345566,0.00035154287,0.00036397058,0.00013144844,0.00011121445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008359537,0.00024594567,0.00019608185,0.00028321912,0.0001639325,0.0006340557,0.00043859018,0.00026737215,0.0029037998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035123795,0.00021811933,0.00022237076,0.00012347037,0.0007989111,0.00076752016,0.00094450614,0.0005496096,0.00018186684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002315644,0.0018108775,0.01467128,0.0005734754,0.0001910297,0.0004472692,0.0013971453,0.008760824,0.71608627,0.038467444,0.00094242947,0.2143363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015480317,0.008723596,0.17344174,0.00026907312,0.0007529582,0.0018224414,0.0009374167,0.18234657,0.43445036,0.17903,0.016441017,0.00023686387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018614002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015618597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029037998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020266767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022306708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009714127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169090813","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.011","title":"The aesthetics of luxury fashion, body and identify formation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Fashion and Cultural Textiles","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Aesthetics; Identity (music); Perception; Everyday Aesthetics; Focus (optics); Psychology; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.026801026035935968,"score_gpt":0.3073534162930194,"score_spread":0.2805523902570834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169090813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8295869,0.0005656665,0.014388085,0.0009935697,0.00004906765,0.000013955981,0.000018205294,0.000025012163,0.1543595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966536,0.00007512187,0.00082790834,0.000025967613,0.0000064220067,0.0000033302667,0.0000030478516,0.0000043522027,0.0024002653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961144,0.00021458234,0.0000099683475,0.000034873843,0.00009023099,0.000038946793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994567,0.00021802881,0.00014386931,0.00007341822,0.00006264073,0.000045199824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070311996,0.0001528438,0.00011551483,0.00049133255,0.00077563815,0.0033291408,0.00017444884,0.00029279807,0.0039802864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013540643,0.0001288838,0.00017767583,0.00034059247,0.00445974,0.0010251108,0.0011661885,0.0005667304,0.00016257232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004679589,0.00014828754,0.09936522,0.00039718844,0.00006060642,0.001555023,0.10482142,0.00269911,0.027165484,0.65269345,0.0019481475,0.10867807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051802937,0.00045495358,0.41645604,0.00048892276,0.000106414336,0.0037697668,0.17671601,0.011180451,0.0093075065,0.29757404,0.08379007,0.000104058556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005175408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006942019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039802864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048206883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019079915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01331538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172834523","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.11.001","title":"Experiencing haptic roughness promotes empathy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Empathy; Psychology; Haptic technology; Empathic concern; Cognitive psychology; Perspective-taking; Social psychology; Intervention (counseling); Computer science","score_opus":0.20057592594438775,"score_gpt":0.3641322999798513,"score_spread":0.16355637403546355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172834523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99596727,0.0002931724,0.0006788172,0.00016708428,0.000043778793,0.00000862628,0.00001849159,0.000016214815,0.0028064533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988557,0.00016529646,0.0003220384,0.0000648065,0.000014570293,0.0000090373205,0.000006532858,0.0000035427531,0.00055855967],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985206,0.00004861243,0.000005525502,0.000023977365,0.00003616823,0.00003367673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995758,0.00021300152,0.000096377655,0.000032610373,0.000018375358,0.00006387809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017448077,0.00018229899,0.00014203014,0.00012795119,0.00019460094,0.0003910465,0.00010157229,0.00034471613,0.006035061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012253528,0.0001046074,0.000121458936,0.000042042964,0.00048372455,0.00027015855,0.000894299,0.00069564267,0.00019767559],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0049680206,0.0011790347,0.0051927646,0.0006909122,0.00007603978,0.00070247846,0.0017650633,0.00028736112,0.92720234,0.0016944478,0.0011672784,0.055074237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007593531,0.02486912,0.70767933,0.00066521915,0.00041538267,0.0036619934,0.006568289,0.0034495618,0.22328468,0.013761726,0.014760904,0.00012451905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012011677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017463756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006035061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010489768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000103493374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020189285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254320434","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.04.003","title":"Evolutionary consumer psychology: Ask not what you can do for biology, but…","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Nomological network; Evolutionary psychology; Modularity (biology); Perspective (graphical); Empirical evidence; Cognitive science; Multidisciplinary approach; Evolutionary neuroscience; Psychology; Evolutionary ecology; Data science; Epistemology; Computer science; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Evolutionary biology; Social psychology; Sociology; Ecology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0585778271314842,"score_gpt":0.3922713392608622,"score_spread":0.33369351212937803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254320434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026566445,0.00083478953,0.00040779408,0.9936923,0.0037941975,0.000002563265,0.000021291202,0.000013599561,0.00096777454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017350504,0.0015056083,0.000987563,0.9612366,0.015081773,0.000028257333,0.00002974425,0.000048365633,0.0037315337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544734,0.0016840117,0.00032100896,0.0009532649,0.0011771453,0.00041717046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95062923,0.032301884,0.0022906906,0.002381109,0.0106967045,0.0017003318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015296116,0.0009727334,0.0012474919,0.0010284471,0.0039470224,0.00430144,0.0041320724,0.02186516,0.009608046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055378165,0.00045071694,0.0012849353,0.0010938742,0.015122183,0.012197924,0.0028556583,0.026532719,0.0047352677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000992224,0.000031346783,0.0013141956,0.00020502812,0.00004731869,0.00035520137,0.0014189896,0.00031455007,0.0003689074,0.122155115,0.8616829,0.012007251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073509655,0.00005854009,0.0032910842,0.00072561594,0.00004864246,0.00041322553,0.0031494906,0.0012041547,0.00070028484,0.29549545,0.69466925,0.00017081421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009488074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007052303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02186516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038876256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002475518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08089459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265806969","doi":"10.1207/15327660152054003","title":"Low-Involvement Learning: Repetition and Coherence in Familiarity and Belief","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Repetition (rhetorical device); Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.042371564591633604,"score_gpt":0.3630204773631098,"score_spread":0.32064891277147617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265806969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.958919,0.00022936105,0.012025667,0.0007099056,0.00001712028,0.0000445681,0.000037749858,0.000054163258,0.02796242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99827373,0.000028870345,0.0009821824,0.00004007379,0.0000074789873,0.00001601658,0.000021449545,0.000012467291,0.0006176421],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943845,0.0028379844,0.00029026362,0.00078937924,0.001350085,0.00034772308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9041808,0.064120196,0.012200276,0.011776073,0.0052170735,0.0025055304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006368475,0.0002209221,0.00036803854,0.0013248104,0.0009738443,0.0056293895,0.0009948072,0.0012727173,0.0052616606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0825028,0.0006181399,0.00028961583,0.0008428556,0.005307931,0.007553404,0.003727707,0.0020226007,0.00052673207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017835447,0.0014453954,0.3815508,0.0005566207,0.00032242457,0.0009180266,0.2454893,0.0022491321,0.015190532,0.12720744,0.0023251902,0.22096153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028107618,0.0011658908,0.51764804,0.00026374563,0.00023908672,0.0016317451,0.052852686,0.013770082,0.0059999186,0.39826193,0.0075827814,0.00030298426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026062103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019296629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006368475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012310153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080321403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03368008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2346012354","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2016.04.004","title":"When red means go: Non‐normative effects of red under sensation seeking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Color perception and design","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sensation seeking; Psychology; Normative; Compliance (psychology); Reactance; Social psychology; Arousal; Sensation; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03471439186069055,"score_gpt":0.34759083955593356,"score_spread":0.31287644769524303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2346012354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912446,0.000041378396,0.0007128212,0.00008834405,0.000011207762,0.000018661058,0.000017841285,0.000024627852,0.007840466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987079,0.000026393405,0.00069553114,0.00006550834,0.0000064286005,0.000020394815,0.000011770138,0.000018272414,0.000447721],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990761,0.0005098512,0.00003384241,0.00013014449,0.00018316731,0.0000668115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886882,0.008099598,0.0016363565,0.0007102455,0.00036167065,0.0005038175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014355191,0.00019503896,0.00019335619,0.00024077804,0.00028428825,0.00097407115,0.00024780352,0.0004142,0.0055242954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010865711,0.00020473945,0.00021430745,0.00015342614,0.00074182573,0.00045816,0.0005676881,0.00072085456,0.000185891],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023647398,0.0078957165,0.16921254,0.0011539083,0.0002736236,0.00078533025,0.011496075,0.0018846118,0.6700514,0.023326982,0.0012471233,0.08902523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028790807,0.0035732237,0.9540755,0.00008273891,0.00023075538,0.00022188755,0.0024192613,0.00271677,0.028204344,0.0065885526,0.0015549592,0.000044097716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060170033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080718735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055242954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032384132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002215488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018480659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2417761538","doi":"10.1207/153276602760078613","title":"Misrepresentation in the Consumer Context","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Misrepresentation; Lying; Context (archaeology); Consumption (sociology); Interpersonal communication; Social psychology; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Impression management; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Business; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.09780787559974172,"score_gpt":0.42020981577697847,"score_spread":0.3224019401772368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2417761538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25052252,0.007051106,0.026340755,0.13775575,0.002221063,0.000060170118,0.0001804354,0.0002256428,0.5756425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.976538,0.0009760216,0.001851971,0.0050251754,0.00045612344,0.000018092926,0.000035641853,0.0000951788,0.01500382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95302457,0.033202,0.0014977365,0.002806675,0.007840307,0.0016287363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9578139,0.02147342,0.005252733,0.008028996,0.0061275237,0.001303399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019691449,0.0005810966,0.00055474526,0.002916787,0.009786685,0.01818776,0.0015667903,0.006440311,0.009684405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05794395,0.0005416602,0.00038746744,0.00329686,0.02474879,0.020682616,0.011552404,0.0054653287,0.0012298867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009446709,0.000035766152,0.0068419175,0.00012803674,0.000026806649,0.0017736016,0.26362458,0.00014417403,0.00050379685,0.6754042,0.018116899,0.03330581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002855882,0.000046899193,0.00376004,0.00058478175,0.000056028293,0.0035052772,0.20931308,0.0012198827,0.0015616189,0.3836416,0.39617875,0.000103571634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007770184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059953523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019691449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006773853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040393164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104139626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512303288","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2016.08.008","title":"The warmth of our regrets: Managing regret through physiological regulation and consumption","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Regret; Embodied cognition; Psychology; Feeling; Action (physics); Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Cognition; Cognitive dissonance; Arousal; Cognitive psychology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12659868714688177,"score_gpt":0.37165199588394504,"score_spread":0.24505330873706327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512303288","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600777,0.0007416644,0.01141237,0.0016079055,0.00009796354,0.000032264827,0.000028005497,0.00006475118,0.025937334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973375,0.00018291136,0.0015016127,0.0001373995,0.00003670462,0.000011328521,0.000008474787,0.000008520965,0.0007755184],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944216,0.00033173617,0.000015490641,0.00004600211,0.000106562155,0.000058086214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984945,0.0007682098,0.00039508202,0.00014468993,0.000091772505,0.000105723535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001110406,0.00022510083,0.00016841959,0.00029511013,0.0004207944,0.0016543713,0.00025383383,0.00042708655,0.0020648353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047705607,0.00012279736,0.00025615096,0.00015366741,0.0009268581,0.0007793074,0.00066658447,0.0007707789,0.00014656175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003809238,0.0039814017,0.15775456,0.0012648555,0.00078657194,0.0010844117,0.049569137,0.007349652,0.15221784,0.04704758,0.004796381,0.57033837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034099026,0.0045368588,0.77687645,0.0006700587,0.0011185814,0.0014127071,0.027569067,0.029844576,0.053761173,0.057675302,0.04592753,0.00026673728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005238658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000505847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020648353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030062094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002723332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069075227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528396400","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2016.09.005","title":"How inferred contagion biases dispositional judgments of others","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Object (grammar); Psychology; Social psychology; Emotional contagion; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.15679362857812448,"score_gpt":0.3428869711293628,"score_spread":0.1860933425512383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528396400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950995,0.000051917505,0.001277717,0.00007155029,0.00001294485,0.000009867458,0.000019394975,0.0000101844425,0.0034469452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993387,0.000026361935,0.0003718567,0.00004154242,0.0000041276976,0.000004044473,0.000024091842,0.0000066934845,0.00018251997],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795073,0.0007695794,0.00011005381,0.0004039792,0.00062302593,0.00014266626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98654014,0.0058849812,0.0037231557,0.0021349418,0.0011137875,0.0006029554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034354122,0.00029824182,0.00027694413,0.00051935285,0.00044963506,0.0023269907,0.00025996924,0.0007501914,0.0021493603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029096354,0.0003844762,0.00022452745,0.00025185922,0.0012695718,0.001147054,0.0009847014,0.0011158601,0.00022541161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004491306,0.0007713035,0.7718006,0.0002795525,0.00088182103,0.00046443404,0.013492833,0.0030950122,0.13893035,0.007970389,0.00090093014,0.056921467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006004035,0.0005543163,0.9566665,0.00006674609,0.00022975598,0.00034668302,0.0023447506,0.009905884,0.016225962,0.012509607,0.00096899853,0.000120687175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00251394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002876553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034354122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004675203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022820925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01816845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529428667","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1035","title":"A Self‐Regulatory Model of Resource Scarcity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Resource scarcity; Resource (disambiguation); Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Commodity; Economics; Psychology; Microeconomics; Natural resource economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.09276690302536922,"score_gpt":0.4348259738531893,"score_spread":0.34205907082782006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529428667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35848737,0.0010713018,0.29578185,0.02483754,0.00021306466,0.00038822612,0.00021654899,0.0001804598,0.31882367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9787204,0.00035130835,0.014974349,0.00051430333,0.00004076525,0.00018614819,0.00003731043,0.000014948592,0.0051603913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906176,0.00045199442,0.000029778079,0.0001710583,0.00018937714,0.00009606635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855083,0.00067011203,0.00026304089,0.00012783697,0.00020280103,0.00018526382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017442044,0.00036702666,0.00023831142,0.000688975,0.0005912529,0.0016835147,0.0010550689,0.0010529662,0.004758952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028011547,0.00025560692,0.00060887105,0.00040092837,0.003509937,0.0025441344,0.0013121882,0.0010955918,0.0003498496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006457503,0.0002068931,0.004749025,0.000084093874,0.00002738867,0.0001768947,0.0025220648,0.008415332,0.0018650397,0.9705056,0.0009189599,0.01046421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096054726,0.00026994996,0.0102874,0.00011681775,0.000051071376,0.0003386769,0.002248163,0.06065429,0.001030187,0.9092815,0.015571303,0.000054779157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001782181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012324736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004758952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001737653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015983712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015920281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2582271348","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.01.003","title":"How goal progress influences regulatory focus in goal pursuit","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"University of Winnipeg","keywords":"Goal pursuit; Regulatory focus theory; Goal orientation; Goal setting; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Focus (optics); Point (geometry); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.07461512724015618,"score_gpt":0.45112661405161825,"score_spread":0.37651148681146207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2582271348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98266083,0.000107341424,0.003285127,0.0001083636,0.000015150196,0.00006737368,0.000025155785,0.00003962863,0.013690975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972139,0.000063485124,0.0019008993,0.00003425615,0.000003962345,0.00004604045,0.000023975892,0.000020331821,0.00069319905],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970794,0.0016844698,0.000089403,0.00033536137,0.0006273632,0.00018410395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828249,0.011754243,0.0019100045,0.0013814397,0.001127649,0.0010018226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056583923,0.0003132695,0.0002868311,0.00064239063,0.00054229633,0.0019984553,0.00043639864,0.0005297854,0.0040584356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027049368,0.00033448165,0.00026254304,0.0003198232,0.0011579909,0.0014759416,0.0012799187,0.0012546913,0.00031790315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0137167955,0.012557846,0.3184507,0.0013995494,0.00059795595,0.00057784683,0.059843995,0.012129709,0.24625494,0.06388574,0.0030318082,0.2675532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000749693,0.008226922,0.89438653,0.00044535776,0.00047486028,0.00031834628,0.011769983,0.018429497,0.029096488,0.025522789,0.01035885,0.0002207678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012300654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001013014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056583923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005114114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005210082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02992475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583012190","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.01.002","title":"Just do it! Why committed consumers react negatively to assertive ads","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Assertiveness; Reactance; Feeling; Advertising; Compliance (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.10317029434847172,"score_gpt":0.3853365607307693,"score_spread":0.2821662663822976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583012190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99466634,0.0001185296,0.00014647373,0.0006994857,0.000025532134,0.000015466272,0.000032200318,0.0000068535287,0.0042892136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987066,0.00009122805,0.000099521516,0.00036305285,0.000018620793,0.000007610125,0.000023954964,0.00000398646,0.0006854602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901474,0.00043618956,0.00006485144,0.00006278501,0.00033701793,0.00008431903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99026126,0.0045155813,0.0027485238,0.0006406121,0.0011379864,0.0006960354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016055171,0.00016867527,0.00021513045,0.00026505964,0.0004626673,0.0017188706,0.00025652171,0.0007144585,0.0052125542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014230652,0.0001548673,0.0002917267,0.0001908381,0.0005353451,0.00068797404,0.00036181745,0.0013360598,0.000513387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012406984,0.0015755806,0.9139971,0.00024702592,0.00026687645,0.00064995955,0.0128427055,0.00014781926,0.008423468,0.0018227906,0.002868883,0.05591717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000635885,0.0008387421,0.9722063,0.00011747976,0.00019913419,0.0007315708,0.016002525,0.0009746807,0.0025922442,0.002318409,0.003900861,0.00005444883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016469031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018396099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052125542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028787545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020277667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017437696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593050311","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1017","title":"When Seeking the Best Brings Out the Worst in Consumers: Understanding the Relationship between a Maximizing Mindset and Immoral Behavior","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Scarcity; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Psychology; Product (mathematics); Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Marketing; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Computer science","score_opus":0.37545247559499884,"score_gpt":0.47851258982934536,"score_spread":0.10306011423434652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593050311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992585,0.00052010233,0.00061398937,0.0017763814,0.000017255876,0.000013559193,0.000013364531,0.0000023903767,0.0044578547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986254,0.0003794267,0.00044731208,0.00031013673,0.000011364935,0.000010820097,0.00001282504,0.0000018520609,0.00020096188],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991848,0.00044599533,0.000035339053,0.00008415759,0.00014038933,0.000109260574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99451244,0.0021570271,0.0022318503,0.0001867893,0.00035580804,0.0005561553],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023886613,0.00024724277,0.00022022701,0.0008357084,0.0010209321,0.0026951637,0.00033783025,0.0011265218,0.0017629947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008168826,0.00036445018,0.00041858476,0.0003933601,0.0024058395,0.0021411933,0.0013254775,0.0017870715,0.00012476943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039035326,0.0013830246,0.89299655,0.00026894783,0.0002982895,0.000606534,0.056351177,0.00049386476,0.0030905516,0.009269638,0.0006328957,0.034218177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022755708,0.00020014685,0.9398014,0.0002116433,0.00013631723,0.00039417588,0.03866005,0.0013356524,0.00058707054,0.016659923,0.0019432941,0.00004752268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003805127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007835982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003805127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011817344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080243946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012632549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593606402","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.03.001","title":"The satiating effect of pricing: The influence of price on enjoyment over time","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.0704521657958546,"score_gpt":0.4577020623484072,"score_spread":0.3872498965525526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593606402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99329776,0.00019540741,0.0012107183,0.00016289046,0.0000142961535,0.00001825603,0.000102548125,0.000013975589,0.0049841795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990909,0.000047077454,0.00039053845,0.00004306812,0.00000948941,0.000007839361,0.000049399605,0.0000098736755,0.0003517577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941933,0.00023861247,0.000028624718,0.00009643804,0.00013912343,0.00007793653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98016614,0.013230172,0.002669743,0.0017452006,0.0007213402,0.0014674481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001764826,0.00017218431,0.00040959226,0.00036295995,0.00028196364,0.0014792898,0.0003958494,0.000581141,0.008470505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018797481,0.00023962972,0.00048153955,0.00036781514,0.00089504785,0.00089918205,0.0007991932,0.0013195329,0.00034751356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011618746,0.0038572054,0.6904127,0.0005313416,0.00068046106,0.00049337256,0.0037529853,0.005381797,0.1715837,0.008414329,0.0011995627,0.10207386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039970364,0.00061412214,0.99281,0.000014763079,0.00007589318,0.000058814687,0.00021349153,0.0023525103,0.0020252692,0.0014787131,0.00029111202,0.000025321298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017935596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015167139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008470505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000371695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026821907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028336644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599481218","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.03.003","title":"Does Red Bull give wings to vodka? Placebo effects of marketing labels on perceived intoxication and risky attitudes and behaviors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Psychology; Placebo; Alcohol intoxication; Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Overconsumption; Injury prevention; Poison control; Environmental health; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.03151448657634963,"score_gpt":0.4211319049245308,"score_spread":0.38961741834818114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599481218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99515826,0.0005250192,0.00065966963,0.0005882589,0.000096161224,0.000085461594,0.000038939597,0.00001157004,0.002836606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985197,0.00016265483,0.00045035503,0.00020313326,0.000051639247,0.000043776072,0.000016907095,0.0000049320747,0.0005469474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774027,0.001523571,0.0000967565,0.00020612056,0.00032471938,0.000108584754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98584586,0.009918501,0.0026250537,0.00073839736,0.00037618403,0.0004958933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034822626,0.00023137781,0.00038410677,0.00014558926,0.0003794466,0.00078159216,0.00019740699,0.000856322,0.0059790066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01640577,0.00024991974,0.0003639457,0.0001182631,0.001150431,0.00070920493,0.00043059033,0.0012567843,0.00018824129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.24237055,0.04920542,0.31025615,0.0042223693,0.0043142093,0.00055749965,0.015745059,0.000777959,0.14544764,0.012097359,0.0023643558,0.21264148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006207948,0.07812474,0.85804766,0.00075331563,0.0029347993,0.00035787252,0.005077874,0.003626066,0.02732897,0.0075698383,0.009857482,0.00011332904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046396683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004163359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059790066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018890982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024876127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020001769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605701288","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.03.005","title":"Refining the tightness and looseness framework with a consumer lens","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Alberta; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Consumer behaviour; Context (archaeology); Punishment (psychology); Through-the-lens metering; Perspective (graphical); Perception; Norm (philosophy); Psychology; Process (computing); Marketing; Social psychology; Lens (geology); Sociology; Positive economics; Economics; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Business; Artificial intelligence; Social science","score_opus":0.06080179629162039,"score_gpt":0.3298166830693209,"score_spread":0.26901488677770047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605701288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21656923,0.008467297,0.23755617,0.23609787,0.0028722428,0.0002541426,0.00019886642,0.00014629212,0.2978379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97152734,0.0010209136,0.012561565,0.009807862,0.000612278,0.00010907923,0.000031514017,0.00005319997,0.0042762244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98512334,0.010854466,0.0004925442,0.0011128479,0.0019003447,0.00051645393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97781223,0.014149278,0.0021581163,0.0016092556,0.003422908,0.00084824377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013884905,0.0006943922,0.00060439075,0.0029135603,0.003351865,0.007298413,0.002331708,0.0036924866,0.0040453156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019142708,0.00032816132,0.0008217581,0.0016881613,0.034645654,0.011663554,0.006262847,0.008061793,0.00034944594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048213915,0.00004250183,0.003570577,0.0001164121,0.000019863051,0.00015678142,0.022529958,0.00030349454,0.0002401128,0.95905143,0.0025458722,0.011374806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030022213,0.00012316997,0.0122956205,0.0006004234,0.000055282213,0.00037758474,0.039550453,0.004882644,0.0006607023,0.8323694,0.108954,0.00010079854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059678424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064671375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013884905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004736358,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026684313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07343125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606035110","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2017.04.002","title":"“Our” brand's failure leads to “their” product derogation","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Derogation; Social identity theory; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Social psychology; Identity (music); Advertising; Self-affirmation; Group (periodic table); Social group; Business","score_opus":0.0702976365965633,"score_gpt":0.43652697408850943,"score_spread":0.36622933749194614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606035110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950075,0.000025479338,0.00029091426,0.0001323933,0.000012352299,0.000007114595,0.0000067887745,0.000011733284,0.0045056413],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999008,0.00002709517,0.00022690295,0.00010251124,0.000006404863,0.000005807219,0.000010232405,0.0000075784637,0.00060546823],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941623,0.00025565585,0.000026260373,0.000060285576,0.0001645866,0.00007710407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99406636,0.0031122824,0.0015790452,0.00057950057,0.00034098056,0.00032193615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008728972,0.00022393887,0.0002047752,0.00020038245,0.00038851844,0.0005773561,0.00016140153,0.0005145859,0.006574264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006470285,0.00012443033,0.00022788289,0.00008982603,0.00053466205,0.00054606877,0.0007129079,0.00095185975,0.00045951505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006236485,0.00475276,0.19737597,0.00075300765,0.00030181077,0.0021193738,0.012526832,0.0008674879,0.6605228,0.0124586,0.0037531364,0.09833171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002046373,0.004143137,0.79009545,0.00015930664,0.00043516,0.0021247177,0.010385984,0.005622478,0.16505042,0.010593137,0.01108606,0.00009947577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054484385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005495879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006574264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001881593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022991846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02199316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765812327","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1047","title":"The Loss of Loss Aversion: Will It Loom Larger Than Its Gain?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Perspective (graphical); Economics; Persistence (discontinuity); Balance (ability); Positive economics; Inequity aversion; Psychology; Microeconomics; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.08635360840923917,"score_gpt":0.3426659880921798,"score_spread":0.2563123796829406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765812327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37930796,0.09295759,0.06397813,0.25404,0.0033703444,0.00007825091,0.00022484525,0.000115913674,0.20592695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96731144,0.014892926,0.0028068735,0.010628386,0.00079384935,0.000029655343,0.000036658872,0.000027411646,0.0034728816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783295,0.0008648726,0.000100569145,0.00029961448,0.00071619166,0.00018582489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99230725,0.0045085535,0.0015356267,0.00050291774,0.00072594127,0.00041966146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005234574,0.00027908958,0.00049456034,0.0005961111,0.0009576429,0.0056646094,0.00082780066,0.0026503268,0.0042553023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019921238,0.00017389811,0.00042835766,0.00057942723,0.013715868,0.0072170957,0.0016815877,0.004994117,0.0005445082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000544354,0.00019560244,0.02496011,0.0008417045,0.0002235088,0.000843929,0.015696395,0.0008075918,0.0042747115,0.68427396,0.011871867,0.25546628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040220253,0.00033438866,0.033599067,0.0011378933,0.00011549012,0.00178844,0.017529275,0.0015598142,0.0021147362,0.8749429,0.066721134,0.000116652074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012547092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012816167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056646094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001660412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011051991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027683377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782116190","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1002","title":"Lie, Cheat, and Steal: How Harmful Brands Motivate Consumers to Act Unethically","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Punishment (psychology); Psychology; Retributive justice; Action (physics); Advertising; Consumer behaviour; Social psychology; Business; Economic Justice; Law","score_opus":0.14625269052483142,"score_gpt":0.3689483724303552,"score_spread":0.2226956819055238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782116190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99136764,0.00021428715,0.00035361006,0.0009843226,0.000010560718,0.000012592168,0.0000056017843,0.0000021430963,0.0070492667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838054,0.00021081501,0.00031930988,0.00035761046,0.0000063236084,0.00000942196,0.000008324174,0.000003018789,0.00070460135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990941,0.00045790453,0.000037096546,0.000088637295,0.00024164854,0.000080633945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928042,0.0036059006,0.0022186534,0.00036456474,0.0005677971,0.0004388824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022605956,0.00014657335,0.00016606777,0.00040501048,0.0009070366,0.0029719933,0.00030397595,0.0012357286,0.0026262852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012730251,0.00018492274,0.00025630562,0.00023961991,0.0020776717,0.0021186026,0.0009655217,0.0016579761,0.00020026631],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010026416,0.0025591853,0.7818232,0.0003381219,0.0002880759,0.0007151517,0.08452871,0.0005841462,0.0060502994,0.027579922,0.002704258,0.091826275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079941485,0.00073721725,0.88308126,0.00027632614,0.00034103976,0.0007597915,0.07265503,0.0033916943,0.0027387275,0.028097095,0.0077413674,0.000100546786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032017848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007860577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032017848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010612413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008420576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011955321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782762104","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1023","title":"Discounting Humanity: When Consumers are Price Conscious, Employees Appear Less Human","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Marketing; Humanity; Perception; Business; Service (business); Discounting; Economics; Psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.05460520579226862,"score_gpt":0.3809652461218973,"score_spread":0.3263600403296287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782762104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771185,0.00022779449,0.0011660891,0.0010964323,0.000043444128,0.000022898885,0.000017002683,0.000016761733,0.020291109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988217,0.00006493291,0.0002181015,0.00023862447,0.000012197751,0.00000580628,0.000009896606,0.0000030912595,0.00062565634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993413,0.00019373029,0.00003201332,0.000060448525,0.00023338979,0.00013905672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969764,0.00078569277,0.0011701368,0.0003139338,0.0003288856,0.00042497975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010540858,0.00020314824,0.00016431481,0.00047799308,0.0009402887,0.0027082684,0.00020563473,0.00074820046,0.003732495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004869356,0.00017420665,0.0002826985,0.0002460301,0.002762757,0.0017024542,0.0016612896,0.0013794715,0.0002243924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018469779,0.0010376769,0.5615504,0.0008278413,0.00030304503,0.0023680874,0.18445769,0.00039421584,0.060937095,0.05913977,0.006557885,0.120579414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000646914,0.0006158402,0.8516827,0.00018847513,0.00014677645,0.002253432,0.098586105,0.00065603846,0.006171972,0.022254154,0.017238261,0.00014158955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001632224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025332433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003732495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008103734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045900434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012486458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2783002478","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1029","title":"Can Everyday Brands Be Threatening? Responses to Brand Primes Depend on Childhood Socioeconomic Status","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; York University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Psychology; Everyday life; Norm (philosophy); Low income; Social psychology; Sociology; Socioeconomics; Population; Political science; Demography","score_opus":0.03369004341931433,"score_gpt":0.3212770989791861,"score_spread":0.2875870555598718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2783002478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996498,0.000049604307,0.00010890922,0.000075174205,0.000013881701,0.000008328946,0.00001578816,0.000002761974,0.0032274663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883944,0.00009810587,0.00016881869,0.00011281132,0.000011900095,0.000011946397,0.00002875971,0.000005464631,0.00072273676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962723,0.00012817177,0.000016302442,0.00007239496,0.00009311277,0.000062838655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708563,0.0015150509,0.0008165171,0.00018271297,0.000121756966,0.00027842715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066972215,0.00020415155,0.0001869602,0.0001969522,0.00035808672,0.0010037677,0.00011391374,0.0006109739,0.0072372677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006254066,0.0002484401,0.00019018524,0.00013216794,0.0005269857,0.0007285182,0.00063202454,0.00065584475,0.00043048547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008738608,0.0037226207,0.6734345,0.00063527754,0.00022901931,0.0012286722,0.03097739,0.00041281348,0.20687823,0.0058648097,0.0014755265,0.06640245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004793094,0.0013197701,0.98134685,0.00007783121,0.00007139401,0.00028064175,0.0056697386,0.00034477742,0.0072176773,0.0019202451,0.0016758965,0.000027187361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064229633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090020604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072372677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018340697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015892525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02421105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793286537","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1031","title":"If You Are Going to Pay Within the Next 24 Hours, Press 1: Automatic Planning Prompt Reduces Credit Card Delinquency","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto; University of Toronto","keywords":"Concreteness; Juvenile delinquency; Psychology; Action (physics); Credit card; Test (biology); Plan (archaeology); Debt; Business; Cognitive psychology; Finance; Payment; Criminology","score_opus":0.24459474517595206,"score_gpt":0.46298260745756364,"score_spread":0.21838786228161158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793286537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866962,0.00012168368,0.0035160917,0.00083551026,0.00021019844,0.0005693787,0.0004155205,0.0013901194,0.006245273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814881,0.00018046971,0.010136433,0.0004518579,0.00011001487,0.000994278,0.0002987544,0.000066399516,0.0062736585],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995179,0.00024225163,0.000043123153,0.00008292206,0.00006713126,0.000046754594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943764,0.003714058,0.0008724026,0.00029056869,0.00016837752,0.00057819334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088766246,0.00049326586,0.00045741317,0.00032035477,0.00029861537,0.00055177615,0.0004890299,0.000721679,0.04173166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010835005,0.0002436035,0.00017336485,0.00016330642,0.00030386497,0.0006425082,0.0004585102,0.00070752465,0.0025831207],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.061290964,0.066592686,0.03231566,0.0035419518,0.00025827932,0.0003824533,0.0033397973,0.002791603,0.047442816,0.002362904,0.03748726,0.7421936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024355771,0.15458487,0.64463735,0.0016402489,0.0021885394,0.0009919883,0.0053384285,0.03209545,0.057797574,0.011504111,0.0644315,0.0004341832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007026721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012865051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04173166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021781174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041817455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1396063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800485607","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1051","title":"Urgently Yours: Temporal Communication Norms and Psychological Distance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Modalities; Mediation; Moderation; Normative; Interpretation (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Modality (human–computer interaction); Through-the-lens metering; Space (punctuation); Field (mathematics); Social psychology; Closure (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Lens (geology); Sociology; Epistemology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.174126486644803,"score_gpt":0.45916423303461185,"score_spread":0.28503774638980883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800485607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9037361,0.00068829925,0.0093803415,0.0053713312,0.00021295223,0.000027803291,0.000066718705,0.00003492243,0.080481425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978715,0.00010105904,0.0008044477,0.00016438896,0.000047140777,0.000009361935,0.000013620909,0.000010389304,0.0009780244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688894,0.0019430066,0.00014956569,0.0002773512,0.0006191645,0.00012192908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9734177,0.014095061,0.006176429,0.0018978376,0.002910097,0.0015028962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049126195,0.00015105635,0.00014028842,0.0007340739,0.001247663,0.0037807794,0.00038821003,0.0007457763,0.0042112125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031134013,0.00016225995,0.00013645245,0.00049380196,0.0037724266,0.00409341,0.0017674201,0.0012942855,0.00024949762],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011530819,0.00056034036,0.15645319,0.00046993274,0.00014582361,0.000674866,0.30288833,0.0011117851,0.010104636,0.39124504,0.003953992,0.13123894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022526179,0.0011491358,0.3290925,0.00061502826,0.00018294802,0.001640015,0.28205168,0.0066911527,0.0062463284,0.29787362,0.073884256,0.00034808103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018976262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016267983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049126195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008500755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090677605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025980711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802578375","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1052","title":"The Effects of Linguistic Devices on Consumer Information Processing and Persuasion: A Language Complexity × Processing Mode Framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Fondation HEC; Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Persuasion; Extant taxon; Mode (computer interface); Product (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Deep linguistic processing; Romance; Information processing; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Human–computer interaction; Social psychology","score_opus":0.023352984152377004,"score_gpt":0.35806744610269714,"score_spread":0.3347144619503201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802578375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76407534,0.0071916427,0.07722382,0.00888555,0.00017713699,0.0005903344,0.00041264683,0.00014887836,0.14129467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767914,0.0010019764,0.02019547,0.0005824649,0.000116806965,0.0003064766,0.000063377425,0.000036680984,0.0009054119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928022,0.0042024953,0.00042271396,0.0008770413,0.0013235732,0.00037199326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.927835,0.060136337,0.006018609,0.00236349,0.0025946426,0.0010519072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008374112,0.0010572734,0.00061104755,0.004891778,0.0014274422,0.008364487,0.0010882284,0.0018566983,0.0051077264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029322593,0.0007042459,0.0013038886,0.0018113022,0.010300009,0.007816399,0.004526096,0.0027061044,0.0004237086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014877165,0.0015179911,0.10863695,0.002502904,0.000851338,0.0008997029,0.045660056,0.005798104,0.016268013,0.6923974,0.0014074392,0.1225723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005933904,0.0017367278,0.32960385,0.0012622479,0.001584503,0.001084473,0.015606845,0.024731157,0.007942914,0.60104835,0.014358832,0.0004468143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019042433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001545955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008374112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022495803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00150048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044287026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808749165","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1065","title":"Shape‐ and Trait‐Congruency: Using Appearance‐based Cues as a Basis for Product Recommendations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Trait; Product (mathematics); Psychology; Consumer research; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Field (mathematics); Product category; Advertising; Computer science; Mathematics; Business; Geometry","score_opus":0.09088857956544044,"score_gpt":0.37683734175546124,"score_spread":0.2859487621900208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808749165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98869205,0.00016720628,0.002932932,0.00012056299,0.000020405923,0.000040258226,0.000071728566,0.000028911752,0.007926003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950405,0.00008269338,0.004264701,0.000083378996,0.000009870882,0.000016930893,0.000086516,0.000014092283,0.00040134022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916315,0.00034837198,0.00005594863,0.00019953371,0.00019316576,0.000039822266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99208814,0.00420511,0.0021635452,0.00072979974,0.0005342178,0.00027918685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014343126,0.00022645315,0.00023201246,0.00069455564,0.00032856298,0.0011706939,0.00026406712,0.0006273438,0.002933802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018306913,0.00021959546,0.00020165338,0.00041627657,0.00036417114,0.0010716675,0.00069769257,0.0006293878,0.00034904556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004915152,0.001633789,0.5797716,0.00078181265,0.00033253728,0.00057946885,0.007926978,0.0021430813,0.16933948,0.00541121,0.001429204,0.22573571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000919779,0.00087739615,0.9763157,0.0000835157,0.00015029112,0.0003185048,0.0015905587,0.007844116,0.0071670422,0.0027016012,0.0027932136,0.00006606181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021440429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032169765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002933802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002726907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026981105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00981456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809189556","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1063","title":"Supersize My Chances: Promotional Lotteries Impact Product Size Choices","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lottery; Purchasing; Product (mathematics); Odds; Advertising; Marketing; Control (management); Business; Economics; Core (optical fiber); Microeconomics; Computer science; Logistic regression","score_opus":0.09664101364738907,"score_gpt":0.45288223318322146,"score_spread":0.3562412195358324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809189556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8790604,0.09577482,0.0033688617,0.0030909756,0.00053162355,0.0003631957,0.001037028,0.00010697799,0.016666133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987502,0.008640648,0.0013923816,0.0008812308,0.00011285909,0.00010625249,0.00021152444,0.000022433229,0.0011306582],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446255,0.0037737957,0.00040554276,0.00059798587,0.00060338393,0.0001566617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95211434,0.042032972,0.003448288,0.0012759353,0.00048925943,0.0006392122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009088851,0.000575808,0.0010113597,0.00077842077,0.0004196907,0.0023821807,0.00085281616,0.0013182109,0.008538693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04454034,0.00054939353,0.00343896,0.00089242595,0.0009152858,0.0017520173,0.0011170242,0.0021136366,0.0003241072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06335453,0.0075702323,0.29626113,0.032519903,0.22608508,0.00055856456,0.0061482755,0.0040626363,0.0033499463,0.015101242,0.006746614,0.33824182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011065242,0.018492643,0.64331293,0.008752158,0.23956783,0.00060198724,0.0030074615,0.0068536354,0.0035832825,0.042273983,0.02220032,0.00028854015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031310753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031707317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009088851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005865856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065587787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048066974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896682018","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1073","title":"How Readability Shapes Social Media Engagement","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Readability; Fluency; Processing fluency; Social media; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Advertising; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.07399433387570431,"score_gpt":0.3555073221353864,"score_spread":0.2815129882596821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896682018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955421,0.0000696118,0.0007240598,0.000086316104,0.000004960673,0.000012976435,0.0002180656,0.000022675526,0.0033192122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988422,0.00002789228,0.00034742098,0.000021593645,0.000011018053,0.000009704268,0.00016774774,0.000011435905,0.00056094944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994355,0.00018127801,0.00004469768,0.00015056248,0.00012001793,0.0000680085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875531,0.007547802,0.0030259665,0.00061566744,0.0006764699,0.00058089884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007483955,0.00023401687,0.00018235025,0.0010419888,0.00030632602,0.0021598542,0.00019989508,0.00052255346,0.0060318466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014444077,0.00014275342,0.0002686393,0.0006419934,0.0005302944,0.0017615603,0.00066302594,0.00043732024,0.00076023],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004931391,0.00027285874,0.9419071,0.0001358951,0.00012970652,0.00039065574,0.011879474,0.00054912944,0.013763344,0.0006875443,0.0005954795,0.02919575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053830177,0.00012698138,0.9927441,0.000011660109,0.000020204354,0.0001663894,0.002825836,0.0010088241,0.0012448954,0.0009779719,0.00085210754,0.000015731834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016007783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023383186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060318466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002940359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012114558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020178497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912794133","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2013.03.002","title":"Evolutionary consumption","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Evolutionary psychology; Consilience; Darwinism; Psychology; Reciprocal altruism; Altruism (biology); Epistemology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05165076293100369,"score_gpt":0.3780762029933383,"score_spread":0.3264254400623346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912794133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05241779,0.058604706,0.01615181,0.021326171,0.0011398881,0.00013034484,0.0008604721,0.0001894178,0.84917945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5774637,0.0649098,0.012779527,0.004705997,0.0011472035,0.00014766326,0.0012890572,0.00019761658,0.33735946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996253,0.000116163195,0.000018407754,0.00008474449,0.000105457475,0.00004995407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997024,0.00007194174,0.000037450383,0.000053325482,0.00008668715,0.000048220238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059840095,0.00043591653,0.00028101171,0.0013859549,0.0009298908,0.0027837101,0.0004527153,0.0010565474,0.033042233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012268206,0.0001559538,0.00029643942,0.0015640187,0.0014438996,0.0021017892,0.0014880742,0.0010065669,0.0034883192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008878555,0.00010478548,0.0068939305,0.0004943982,0.00005061372,0.00034736723,0.0030536368,0.00058388524,0.0011015572,0.5835786,0.0429846,0.36071795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005503284,0.000057090376,0.010317434,0.0004572763,0.000014001986,0.000664045,0.0011224366,0.0004967687,0.00040372548,0.087598525,0.8988443,0.000018897661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015267528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015669925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033042233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011739738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005391789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11053723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914258438","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1098","title":"Compared to Dematerialized Money, Cash Increases Impatience in Intertemporal Choice","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cash; Economics; Intertemporal choice; Patience; Dynamic inconsistency; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Psychology; Finance; Social psychology","score_opus":0.14118398296251916,"score_gpt":0.4745694727849915,"score_spread":0.33338548982247235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914258438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.969948,0.00064922735,0.00458908,0.0009457434,0.000038075097,0.00002246589,0.00004011733,0.000015509087,0.023751665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972574,0.00020130054,0.0014262596,0.00012825077,0.000018773324,0.000007758307,0.00001468699,0.0000040084083,0.000941511],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990722,0.00052546227,0.000055967655,0.000109165885,0.00017636124,0.00006075701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886947,0.0074984725,0.0023406907,0.0009085993,0.0002065141,0.00035094275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013632533,0.00029949925,0.00019556335,0.00028518683,0.00032084718,0.0021246872,0.00023677382,0.0005781799,0.0074575157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011691285,0.00018235254,0.0003600935,0.0004196071,0.0012573118,0.0016670125,0.00080739387,0.001121075,0.00026495353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070728087,0.0034563504,0.3275158,0.0013818647,0.0012856397,0.0012668156,0.0068606334,0.01871428,0.05900911,0.31911388,0.0017636947,0.25255913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024423734,0.003440328,0.71981245,0.00032099124,0.0007529865,0.0012251972,0.0032895468,0.013301505,0.014424382,0.21846001,0.024527036,0.00020132052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004713004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083184405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074575157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057959656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018539288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024947882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916213717","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1101","title":"Can Implicit Theory Influence Construal Level?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Mindset; Psychology; Implicit personality theory; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Self construal; Process (computing); Social psychology; Flexibility (engineering); Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematics; Interdependence","score_opus":0.08414595271185488,"score_gpt":0.4089094565931639,"score_spread":0.32476350388130903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916213717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95143175,0.0006689329,0.009878776,0.0021788988,0.000057648715,0.000054042088,0.000072144714,0.000029281557,0.035628602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997976,0.00014125402,0.001087001,0.00017151843,0.000015353837,0.000016617772,0.000057940797,0.000016568778,0.0005177719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99240667,0.0044982163,0.00031515097,0.0007859148,0.0016160872,0.00037802217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89834654,0.072700575,0.009263354,0.010974806,0.0069207405,0.0017939345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011931262,0.00032510216,0.00051287276,0.0013114798,0.00060774275,0.0051287776,0.0008658556,0.0014574656,0.006518517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089652725,0.0004022476,0.0005244586,0.001158265,0.0042631305,0.004511077,0.0016873915,0.0027475057,0.0006210956],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008469844,0.0012960412,0.76927507,0.00050143054,0.00063112035,0.00050708686,0.049937233,0.0019325089,0.004206368,0.07954662,0.0012751827,0.09004429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017762209,0.0006199159,0.82334477,0.00044230925,0.00041850645,0.0006695286,0.021839777,0.012753179,0.0027894247,0.12907879,0.007692504,0.00017366988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029555243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029232719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011931262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011841627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010278842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063099265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956053547","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1127","title":"Compensating for Innovation: Extreme Product Incongruity Encourages Consumers to Affirm Unrelated Consumption Schemas","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Moderation; Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Preference; Ethnocentrism; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.09975593168979328,"score_gpt":0.34366113818300925,"score_spread":0.24390520649321595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956053547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99700135,0.000014580115,0.0005759202,0.000083955994,0.0000035082558,0.000011560734,0.0000023463906,0.000011304955,0.0022955127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988103,0.000013517965,0.00073787436,0.00008248812,0.000004743103,0.000010406083,0.000008143017,0.0000037895932,0.0003286135],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992986,0.00030326765,0.00003603679,0.000082311424,0.00021321373,0.00006654902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969387,0.0016223049,0.0006609612,0.00040657658,0.00010302655,0.00026840874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013007097,0.0002137585,0.00015485164,0.00021998296,0.00036543302,0.0008485383,0.00015812577,0.00046096474,0.0022977411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005020197,0.00015028784,0.00017847352,0.0001163204,0.000679162,0.00058335747,0.0009948001,0.00082087104,0.00012377875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041242777,0.008614508,0.27930948,0.0005092973,0.000200213,0.0011250041,0.021822812,0.0014851458,0.5233071,0.012130386,0.0014626938,0.1459091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029946334,0.0057496056,0.9136376,0.000081478494,0.0001731859,0.0012456626,0.0076751714,0.006483521,0.047294684,0.00986545,0.007393226,0.00010098087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002241185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032310825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022977411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016269063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020969167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0076866746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960488248","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1128","title":"Pairing People with Products: Anthropomorphizing the Object, Dehumanizing the Person","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Dehumanization; Psychology; Object (grammar); Respondent; Social psychology; Pairing; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03601764207259675,"score_gpt":0.27062757530201564,"score_spread":0.2346099332294189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960488248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9806368,0.00015878414,0.0040932638,0.0001268658,0.000019924151,0.000037556074,0.000008513693,0.000024511355,0.014893938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952087,0.00006916056,0.003571418,0.00007681608,0.0000063122948,0.000023236224,0.000009381892,0.000010757912,0.0010241944],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983741,0.0008373967,0.000065498316,0.00026910452,0.0003437251,0.0001102149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957426,0.0019178132,0.0008089452,0.0011689229,0.00011704192,0.0002445797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020607205,0.00037364796,0.00028294086,0.00025991743,0.0007074576,0.0021625224,0.00029331577,0.0007075011,0.0051715127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00642711,0.0003224654,0.00027021472,0.00014800011,0.0022299264,0.0018199614,0.002234724,0.00087192754,0.00037553097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028780138,0.0033406662,0.14514786,0.0014002108,0.00030553038,0.0014205503,0.09909526,0.00090116815,0.48872495,0.049076952,0.0014091253,0.20629978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028868418,0.014737775,0.55793524,0.0006076111,0.0010694354,0.009997719,0.09109833,0.0056063,0.20880131,0.049513485,0.060015585,0.00032850433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033548637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040333348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051715127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023668716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024578578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017300427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993438405","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1153","title":"Reminders of One's Middle Name Result in Decreased Indulgence","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Indulgence; Psychology; Feeling; Association (psychology); Consumption (sociology); Preference; Social psychology; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.08236982534563125,"score_gpt":0.3726223915068879,"score_spread":0.29025256616125666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993438405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99932194,0.00011562723,0.00008627139,0.00006170797,0.000012089008,0.000004909306,0.000007757793,0.0000139717395,0.00037584084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988695,0.00009658272,0.00031742456,0.00010140981,0.000008765918,0.000010277613,0.000020947782,0.000007596385,0.0005673394],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997038,0.0001229409,0.000022597987,0.000052800588,0.00005593365,0.000041828658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963419,0.0015583385,0.0010972503,0.0005885338,0.00010592477,0.00030808395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065053254,0.00019895156,0.00033861204,0.0001449099,0.0002785558,0.0004249883,0.00022108015,0.00055719906,0.00373558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054000067,0.00021879087,0.00035176342,0.0000814657,0.00041161707,0.00042826173,0.00033127549,0.0008601373,0.00028679063],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.056079213,0.03480006,0.18566766,0.0016122711,0.0011250883,0.0038697384,0.009328489,0.00039752576,0.5015624,0.0010968772,0.0031934797,0.20126721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000708988,0.034640994,0.8906576,0.000117282565,0.00048569313,0.0026009397,0.0027097836,0.0007494929,0.06225051,0.0011674786,0.003833994,0.0000772292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033755804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043001486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00373558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013433276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011615402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01249671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016939514","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1169","title":"Impatience and Savoring vs. Dread: Asymmetries in Anticipation Explain Consumer Time Preferences for Positive vs. Negative Events","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Negative emotion; Negative information; Event (particle physics); Motivated reasoning","score_opus":0.16149951328275258,"score_gpt":0.4368891220080851,"score_spread":0.2753896087253325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016939514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99203753,0.0003177797,0.0012781033,0.00028058243,0.0000070595815,0.000019364436,0.000036881742,0.0000029032929,0.006019835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991448,0.0000834265,0.00040969576,0.00006851458,0.0000062889094,0.000010275662,0.000030037892,0.000002330241,0.00024449843],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995542,0.00023838559,0.000031589767,0.000060164086,0.00006945221,0.000046185265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97619927,0.019210681,0.0027388274,0.001012019,0.00045014988,0.0003890775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029146604,0.00024755695,0.00019080572,0.00050010794,0.0003620581,0.0017664833,0.00027271124,0.0008479717,0.006896127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014953307,0.00020403227,0.00062773225,0.0003383389,0.0008001202,0.0013969603,0.00066251116,0.0011033451,0.00018656203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045583416,0.0015332861,0.84488773,0.0007183516,0.00057263364,0.000661704,0.014618075,0.002397674,0.014183561,0.02302278,0.00087032706,0.0919755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013148627,0.00038868174,0.96821636,0.00011488185,0.00042665467,0.00023181687,0.0050498433,0.0044009658,0.0025246856,0.016430542,0.0020243207,0.00005964142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019213468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002862104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006896127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049092056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027505244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023069859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035280082","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1175","title":"When and Why Choices for Others Diverge from Consumers' Own Salient Goals","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Winnipeg","keywords":"Salient; Extant taxon; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Perception; Social psychology; Marketing; Consumer choice; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.10072648802939055,"score_gpt":0.41836603053312604,"score_spread":0.3176395425037355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035280082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853441,0.00012860514,0.00077187415,0.00040501112,0.000009574386,0.000017041028,0.00002022235,0.000009008571,0.013294497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880946,0.00007613149,0.00049911137,0.00007196596,0.0000029318387,0.000009434426,0.000021360594,0.000010053819,0.0004996267],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987324,0.00058436097,0.00005291242,0.00014986884,0.00034690954,0.00013359735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960218,0.0017246127,0.0009682295,0.00050718733,0.00035897578,0.0004192036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021406433,0.00016765816,0.00021182476,0.00034569026,0.00060670625,0.002245676,0.00027644058,0.0006503562,0.002598151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00855452,0.00019243582,0.00029407683,0.00022495344,0.001065569,0.0015520599,0.0010994714,0.0010017309,0.00025964127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025116017,0.0013131012,0.6570286,0.0007103653,0.0005897808,0.0011006363,0.07021175,0.0015016781,0.038211804,0.04958684,0.0035571186,0.17367676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119049684,0.0004520645,0.91171664,0.00016024242,0.00023934596,0.00048170704,0.036499295,0.0024616602,0.006920192,0.03013434,0.010717452,0.0000979574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013734297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002371674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002598151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005809742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039483298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011320949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112271780","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1214","title":"Your Fries are Less Fattening than Mine: How Food Sharing Biases Fattening Judgments Without Biasing Caloric Estimates","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Popularity; Consumption (sociology); Caloric theory; Caloric intake; Psychology; Sharing economy; Calorie; Economics; Marketing; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Obesity; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.3093303409133802,"score_gpt":0.44176781473759785,"score_spread":0.13243747382421767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112271780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9663865,0.00089781435,0.008789801,0.0014107245,0.00011322923,0.00006528018,0.00011675579,0.000051269013,0.022168597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948421,0.0002169338,0.003200761,0.0006243884,0.000036274956,0.000027318341,0.00007639788,0.000041827465,0.0009340886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947364,0.0030493361,0.00014594718,0.0010043985,0.0008373216,0.00022655586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619254,0.025639772,0.0051369285,0.004424324,0.0021285145,0.0007451451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01030755,0.00044277083,0.00049218425,0.0007019884,0.0008949844,0.0038921062,0.0007728688,0.0013712145,0.006554353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07355824,0.0006277933,0.0005473457,0.0005434831,0.0027414556,0.002532306,0.0016556919,0.0013242288,0.00078866753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063755154,0.0012584347,0.62250215,0.0013792444,0.0017100319,0.00070674706,0.05989966,0.0037973796,0.033101737,0.02647581,0.0065813498,0.23621188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036221434,0.0011844845,0.83494234,0.000671075,0.0013412754,0.0010824938,0.016807588,0.01849858,0.010467339,0.10045024,0.01370843,0.0004839596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061143455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005862987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01030755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007779392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006866087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054512203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123259145","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1221","title":"Obesity and Responsiveness to Food Marketing Before and After Bariatric Surgery","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Eating Disorders and Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Obesity; Medicine; Food marketing; Psychology; Surgery; Marketing; Business; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.022666149204985407,"score_gpt":0.31904735836002535,"score_spread":0.29638120915503996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123259145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99962723,0.000039471382,0.000009191942,0.000027860906,0.0000032636674,0.0000028382153,0.000011163941,8.546292e-7,0.00027818096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996062,0.000029994215,0.000018865463,0.000018384155,0.000005701129,0.0000037315215,0.000024101762,0.0000010669171,0.00029199885],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996762,0.000116016105,0.000021205597,0.000039927992,0.000060437764,0.00008616578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966515,0.0009255417,0.0012519497,0.00013103032,0.00014023973,0.0008998573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006603814,0.00018556922,0.00027466408,0.00065268617,0.00035341116,0.0005928207,0.000104801,0.00057830365,0.001441065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004142583,0.00014553012,0.0003492263,0.00039128886,0.00042050827,0.0002456888,0.00029427992,0.0009505751,0.00016577999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053300224,0.0016077831,0.96729094,0.00004633187,0.00013659055,0.0006501798,0.0036294202,0.00013751094,0.011009135,0.000082105274,0.00012554733,0.0099544935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009267399,0.0006069632,0.9984969,0.000002149258,0.000012360228,0.00006376978,0.00053485145,0.000032313903,0.00015182003,0.000018584582,0.00006501482,0.0000061422356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018186374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032967676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018186374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003415496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019906562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0048208237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123423801","doi":"","title":"Goal–Attribute Compatibility in Consumer Choice","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":241,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Compatibility (geochemistry); Proposition; Social psychology; Consumer choice; Goal orientation; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.09357864246894111,"score_gpt":0.4624037990566397,"score_spread":0.3688251565876986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123423801","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95801026,0.00035596767,0.019093413,0.00041226987,0.000020801433,0.00007932327,0.000042363474,0.000021172073,0.021964474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99644,0.00005874724,0.003017836,0.000042908116,0.00001154702,0.00002942298,0.000025443123,0.0000057840557,0.00036836875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583286,0.002404565,0.00017081451,0.00032851714,0.0011145127,0.00014874345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821677,0.01279842,0.0021874197,0.0010368588,0.0011424717,0.00066708075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007457622,0.00032093775,0.00032828367,0.0011079003,0.0005190468,0.0024312702,0.00023691948,0.0006861701,0.003018387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021937054,0.00030023427,0.0006527854,0.0008505255,0.0014033013,0.0015540681,0.0013038862,0.0010995824,0.0002151393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029216525,0.0016199492,0.6275957,0.00047362354,0.00071817904,0.0006822859,0.011398451,0.0074388585,0.01596999,0.17049074,0.000779421,0.15991111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018312482,0.0013123819,0.76098734,0.0001405625,0.00031501337,0.001263118,0.0029998035,0.024346065,0.0050946856,0.19626762,0.006916367,0.00017397455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056495954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004254652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007457622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00062715553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037171572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039440155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124005656","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1219","title":"Consumers—Especially Women—Avoid Buying From Firms With Higher Gender Pay Gaps","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Gender gap; Perception; Gender pay gap; Business; Wage; Marketing; Advertising; Economics; Labour economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.045449741948497754,"score_gpt":0.29155392459838103,"score_spread":0.24610418264988326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124005656","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9750523,0.00022986313,0.0006065514,0.001488659,0.00003104011,0.000026266507,0.00015087292,0.000022677765,0.022391833],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99622667,0.000114875555,0.00022574574,0.0005666573,0.000020582052,0.000006953014,0.00006002044,0.0000064627634,0.0027721033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995888,0.000114220195,0.000020247016,0.000052061932,0.00014793234,0.000076752876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960001,0.0012152692,0.0020305584,0.00030815456,0.0002099166,0.00023595481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087704824,0.0001687924,0.00016128876,0.00035001957,0.0005828322,0.0012883984,0.00012592271,0.0006387721,0.011927794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004536982,0.00012861223,0.00021835988,0.00025335653,0.00044284787,0.0008565832,0.00057600124,0.00054711074,0.0013461245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068273593,0.0005670872,0.8471374,0.00021279952,0.00009609764,0.0006986297,0.008432011,0.00022999043,0.015040339,0.0035280946,0.004957179,0.11841771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024666571,0.00029882765,0.9601676,0.00008916051,0.000056031175,0.00063107256,0.016011668,0.00046426457,0.0037116308,0.0023372502,0.01617152,0.000036306436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021738613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039017068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011927794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002367246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000259223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03990239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124595896","doi":"10.1207/153276603768344807","title":"Preference Construction and Persistence in Digital Marketplaces: The Role of Electronic Recommendation Agents","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Preference; Key (lock); Persistence (discontinuity); Computer science; Recommender system; Business; Advertising; Microeconomics; World Wide Web; Economics; Computer security; Engineering","score_opus":0.03144420913924482,"score_gpt":0.26327543544602455,"score_spread":0.23183122630677974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124595896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874342,0.00012619096,0.0056088534,0.00033259398,0.0000051651514,0.000022515424,0.000022615126,0.00002804528,0.0064198556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981092,0.000040354487,0.0014335309,0.00003155054,0.00000594396,0.00000885345,0.000022007203,0.0000046219616,0.00034384948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977337,0.0012497011,0.00014296424,0.00025712588,0.00044289467,0.00017357754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96823645,0.02034313,0.005187872,0.0037652368,0.001387545,0.0010797651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037385765,0.0002078086,0.00035313683,0.0009916674,0.0009305368,0.0045729745,0.0006244506,0.0012568795,0.004813486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026621971,0.0004370308,0.00047051595,0.0010331529,0.0026217839,0.0052133086,0.0021008463,0.0016013118,0.00032393422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019306125,0.0026591911,0.6373663,0.0003253754,0.00029029005,0.0006084039,0.027987618,0.0038399063,0.016056135,0.085188225,0.00069985125,0.2230481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046777332,0.0018202782,0.77832305,0.000103037404,0.00035707717,0.001183992,0.021734653,0.032987304,0.007722284,0.14439133,0.010655334,0.00025386497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017757289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016925691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004813486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068629434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051373267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019771755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124930118","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1220","title":"Everybody Thinks We Should but Nobody Does: How Combined Injunctive and Descriptive Norms Motivate Organ Donor Registration","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Institute of Population and Public Health","keywords":"Social norms approach; Psychology; Descriptive research; Feeling; Descriptive statistics; Social psychology; Organ donation; Sociology; Perception","score_opus":0.05395230346230232,"score_gpt":0.3484350984040131,"score_spread":0.29448279494171076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124930118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914358,0.00003960483,0.00026034404,0.0006099303,0.000013818112,0.000016082486,0.0000041485578,0.0000037317923,0.007616535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988733,0.000050099,0.0002928374,0.00016517266,0.0000041652706,0.000015068394,0.000006733734,0.0000053763683,0.0005871523],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957683,0.0032779363,0.00007881119,0.00020870136,0.00044617933,0.00021999741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97602975,0.016576704,0.0034789362,0.0010466222,0.0012494143,0.0016186195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008558638,0.00018603692,0.00022273045,0.00056938914,0.0024802631,0.0045311474,0.0006670735,0.001163374,0.003949115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02725248,0.00035922634,0.0002631299,0.00036540517,0.003467588,0.0024519034,0.0019318627,0.001759874,0.00034469442],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075390976,0.005077601,0.40446627,0.0003357917,0.0001365108,0.0010191979,0.48642695,0.00040633784,0.0074319723,0.020860111,0.0031220692,0.069963254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027757668,0.0010399154,0.46853435,0.00028735993,0.0002080276,0.00053868926,0.48855996,0.0043673273,0.003056487,0.019931003,0.013057214,0.00014202663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048613977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078476835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008558638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013390062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001733541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045262992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133901284","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1232","title":"The Power of Indirect Appeals in Peer‐to‐Peer Fundraising: Why “S/He” Can Raise More Money for Me Than “I” Can For Myself","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Credibility; Narrative; Power (physics); Craft; Public relations; Peer review; Field (mathematics); Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; History","score_opus":0.045667851267184374,"score_gpt":0.38742441419026463,"score_spread":0.34175656292308026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133901284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60238886,0.001845275,0.031145368,0.0127316965,0.00034885984,0.00025700202,0.000064981745,0.00011446209,0.3511035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99565804,0.0001583198,0.0016638645,0.00036000428,0.000057784226,0.00004502829,0.0000068983218,0.000024215838,0.0020259127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829366,0.0118963225,0.0004495486,0.0011540261,0.0028180557,0.00074543856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9023961,0.076502554,0.009282961,0.0050136885,0.0042805816,0.0025241203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019218469,0.00042953962,0.00036859492,0.0012921423,0.0031303135,0.0081946775,0.0010487405,0.0021757684,0.01179466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08798458,0.0003879553,0.00034766883,0.0006338418,0.011067551,0.0073946724,0.005252278,0.0032006314,0.0008449467],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011526305,0.0007715007,0.075068556,0.0017721086,0.00033570314,0.0016718593,0.18128155,0.0013992033,0.014517391,0.50162053,0.00684037,0.21356857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042031246,0.001095905,0.12350622,0.0017921046,0.0007957935,0.0028537991,0.0808782,0.0075955726,0.018566012,0.62231743,0.13979279,0.00038586924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013125482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014473413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019218469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020646357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001969985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1016382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134518768","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1233","title":"How Consumer Experience Is Shaped by the Political Orientation of Service Providers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Conscientiousness; Service provider; Counterintuitive; Service (business); Politics; Service-orientation; Marketing; Business; Big Five personality traits; Advertising; Psychology; Social psychology; Public relations; Personality; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.050360135582141724,"score_gpt":0.4034753318584199,"score_spread":0.3531151962762782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134518768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962607,0.000015319907,0.00017341768,0.00012452413,0.000002235116,0.0000030140948,0.000007949576,0.0000016609939,0.003411148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997235,0.000014404797,0.000046814504,0.00002606492,0.0000013341922,0.0000014690916,0.000007924561,0.0000016201842,0.00017688767],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999288,0.00037686375,0.000016562612,0.000053551565,0.00015470912,0.000110230925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998133,0.00092992204,0.00038806107,0.00008364268,0.0002012722,0.00026408152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007171151,0.000083613726,0.00008618282,0.00028727116,0.00045953845,0.0019863888,0.00008946955,0.00032472087,0.002926167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037168232,0.00011500957,0.00012115275,0.00021619024,0.0008528904,0.0005880343,0.0005033495,0.0005133005,0.00017595853],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062255433,0.0004432272,0.86780226,0.000055303022,0.00009244685,0.0006492989,0.07790788,0.00037944817,0.01583955,0.004822746,0.000888914,0.030496353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016414198,0.00017739579,0.9389677,0.000016492904,0.000025088648,0.0002699085,0.05481833,0.00082394725,0.0009880565,0.0016916452,0.0021782757,0.000026765167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002369219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034903816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002926167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003880047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029518473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00978899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139086741","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1240","title":"Relational Spending in Funerals: Caring for Others Loved and Lost","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Planner; Social psychology; Altruism (biology); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.10288024655212076,"score_gpt":0.4131921981072984,"score_spread":0.31031195155517766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139086741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9847919,0.0010617751,0.0020389904,0.0005350934,0.000026756843,0.0000631497,0.00009926593,0.000009828049,0.011373291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949508,0.00068266946,0.0020578532,0.00017759355,0.000015102853,0.000091073955,0.00009504955,0.000009315865,0.0019206499],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979905,0.0013328376,0.00007141435,0.00015004745,0.00026519233,0.00019003151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677,0.0012990503,0.0009948415,0.00032318602,0.00020601302,0.00040694667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002839798,0.00027880288,0.00030640836,0.0007595852,0.002527952,0.003192908,0.0007467751,0.00055410876,0.0037101987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071162684,0.00021900792,0.00030059228,0.00076577486,0.0036335674,0.0024635133,0.0046546706,0.0010366159,0.000192773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004859847,0.0006405755,0.21618558,0.001049236,0.0001892003,0.0008339642,0.56853396,0.00035213394,0.0027528156,0.020076675,0.0043080174,0.1845919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024611913,0.00036229147,0.34990737,0.0006434235,0.00010386726,0.0017268208,0.59319556,0.0005114662,0.0015604589,0.009943681,0.041918673,0.00010175207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024430254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008868823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037101987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001504892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010945924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015018523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3157786993","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1247","title":"Time Will Fly During Future Fun (But Drag Until Then)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Offset (computer science); Duration (music); Social psychology; Perception; Valence (chemistry); Event (particle physics); Time perception; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.031220789906321718,"score_gpt":0.3881683941423008,"score_spread":0.3569476042359791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3157786993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9338061,0.0006630014,0.007773724,0.0011555916,0.00022215028,0.000027502165,0.00013790731,0.000039522223,0.056174446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608445,0.00018733932,0.0013152269,0.00016999365,0.00002940903,0.000009796762,0.00005534482,0.00001064364,0.0021378833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997751,0.000073363895,0.000010127612,0.00003713033,0.00007716031,0.000027219561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987571,0.00036570814,0.00038065965,0.00008215926,0.00023815437,0.00017624543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060845684,0.00014172141,0.00007413051,0.00018791456,0.00050393015,0.0014641596,0.00014543232,0.00037944206,0.0044083428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029280444,0.00011600648,0.00018969353,0.00014372879,0.00077738747,0.0013767902,0.0004765645,0.00046710492,0.00030292518],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054213232,0.00045876083,0.41693562,0.0011204238,0.00028882458,0.0015018356,0.072336465,0.0014169753,0.06721197,0.11653502,0.016627548,0.30014527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008251588,0.0011803132,0.8022909,0.00032778928,0.00018048099,0.0013012607,0.05040064,0.0018498217,0.009788673,0.035744045,0.09668918,0.00016438687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013312922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029831892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044083428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004207663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022917936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014747322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158150180","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1246","title":"Content Hungry: How the Nutrition of Food Media Influences Social Media Engagement","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Misattribution of memory; Affect (linguistics); Social media; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Social psychology; Media content; Media use; Food choice; Caloric theory; Advertising; Business; Political science; Cognition","score_opus":0.14240521678590826,"score_gpt":0.36390884257274847,"score_spread":0.2215036257868402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158150180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926656,0.00005875327,0.0006993998,0.00017579472,0.000007755132,0.000018623618,0.000054950942,0.000009077924,0.006309922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903333,0.000030595915,0.0003805747,0.000049753282,0.000005347788,0.000015383508,0.00003908086,0.000008111937,0.0004378118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992083,0.00039940965,0.000030503315,0.00016404391,0.000114141876,0.00008374316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932985,0.0045813066,0.0010678433,0.00026129672,0.00033180654,0.00045936985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011173466,0.00024924797,0.00017573235,0.0006154062,0.0005597747,0.0031871826,0.00023746472,0.00053757936,0.004252854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099949725,0.0001878293,0.00025215428,0.00042984213,0.00087590073,0.0016249617,0.0010073133,0.00061170367,0.00032645478],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050134264,0.0006987229,0.91529006,0.00020560682,0.00018971488,0.0002564843,0.03451478,0.00040114045,0.009697611,0.0033408182,0.0007080908,0.034195546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001457014,0.00015913558,0.98180306,0.000035597288,0.000078510006,0.00008963576,0.0109109655,0.0018502097,0.0012239751,0.002035845,0.0017771594,0.00002137707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020198105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030058273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004252854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047585997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024233147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0142272115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169576137","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1259","title":"Above the Scam: Moral Elevation Reduces Gullibility","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Elevation (ballistics); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Compliance (psychology); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.17881937430449424,"score_gpt":0.3603880676703937,"score_spread":0.18156869336589948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169576137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99492574,0.00010934959,0.00071394024,0.00038522415,0.000020444852,0.00001060316,0.000011476827,0.000018071414,0.0038051927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984041,0.00008611902,0.00068707037,0.00018156857,0.000014219271,0.000009129958,0.000014588546,0.0000072124108,0.0005962043],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993262,0.0003411252,0.000029577513,0.00006865523,0.00016566983,0.000068711954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964778,0.0014977572,0.0011290876,0.00036716426,0.00016682145,0.00036140005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000938255,0.00020259927,0.0002002942,0.0001602592,0.0004328196,0.0011489398,0.00019425667,0.00070340413,0.00531532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071917926,0.00015890767,0.00024735948,0.000105292434,0.0007392488,0.0005418814,0.0008707461,0.0014357269,0.00028241373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010196266,0.016684687,0.22017935,0.0016226551,0.0009410446,0.0024025398,0.027667124,0.0015524002,0.41040045,0.017305242,0.0073558884,0.28369242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039515313,0.007209699,0.91413486,0.00026110205,0.00048767962,0.0012195741,0.010460646,0.0039601233,0.033867877,0.013823309,0.014057193,0.00012267112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005676978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088585174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00531532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028163934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030334163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017781556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3199651959","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1270","title":"Ethical Branding in A Divided World: How Political Orientation Motivates Reactions to Marketplace Transgressions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Influencer marketing; Biology and political orientation; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Identity (music); Advertising; Business; Marketing; Political science; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.12945152712010147,"score_gpt":0.3934746795166807,"score_spread":0.26402315239657925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199651959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994951,0.000062724255,0.00033488782,0.00019090826,0.000012656318,0.0000067946003,0.0000031559036,0.0000021386254,0.004435682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992779,0.000046499546,0.00016334173,0.00016504459,0.000006838821,0.0000057130187,0.00000630769,0.000004157463,0.000324235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976641,0.0014675951,0.00006392348,0.00020107406,0.00047180112,0.00013158142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98369205,0.007519264,0.005767749,0.0009389954,0.00091111776,0.0011707153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00398813,0.00018759375,0.00020566238,0.0005546739,0.0011805479,0.0038388313,0.00026703437,0.0008941001,0.002405091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019834591,0.00022732734,0.00019486142,0.0002674642,0.0026448558,0.00147969,0.0014515773,0.0019792467,0.0001931719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017191571,0.0025640025,0.6563484,0.0003476192,0.00038041375,0.00096671557,0.21761642,0.000712897,0.037788954,0.01997171,0.0018682454,0.059715375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078717574,0.00076134293,0.8921828,0.00013152661,0.0001406995,0.00047049465,0.08092988,0.00185334,0.004606018,0.013510618,0.005238565,0.00009608397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013486975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002456475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00398813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007183809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039041642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02109152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200021596","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1279","title":"Commentaries on “Abductive Theory Construction”","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Cognitive and psychological constructs research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada); Ontario Council of University Libraries","funders":"","keywords":"Abductive reasoning; Process (computing); Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Strengths and weaknesses; Action (physics); Psychology; Deductive reasoning; Computer science; Management science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07419072908917751,"score_gpt":0.4317687849387526,"score_spread":0.3575780558495751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200021596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024520475,0.0018283143,0.0074172746,0.89177585,0.08681366,0.00016258271,0.00025633234,0.0002557458,0.00903818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10580713,0.0029512513,0.006293529,0.79148835,0.06935597,0.0010897676,0.00035678112,0.0010887121,0.021568496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8613458,0.082326174,0.011279766,0.007870634,0.032029815,0.0051478255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44010523,0.41708323,0.017413992,0.011273952,0.11021922,0.003904435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.096386984,0.0021477053,0.0012673863,0.0037119687,0.011905,0.0077327127,0.006659856,0.018516565,0.009888092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41318703,0.0010950487,0.0027657894,0.0029679975,0.014806788,0.009508967,0.010020763,0.033176154,0.0035549623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017936889,0.000021186672,0.00041235707,0.0008807943,0.00004630279,0.0012373114,0.036982104,0.00035949994,0.0010264002,0.047181968,0.9020509,0.009621833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022487005,0.000036407506,0.000451882,0.0015243195,0.000033628243,0.000303099,0.014236562,0.0007227651,0.001617774,0.011089365,0.969849,0.00011267214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011911228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063456707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096386984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016751355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01053567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5097492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200124202","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1283","title":"The wellbeing implications of maximizing: A conceptual framework and meta‐analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Maximization; Process (computing); Focus (optics); Conceptual framework; Meta-analysis; Decision maker; Social psychology; Management science; Economics; Microeconomics; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.24260888221096222,"score_gpt":0.47723490670550184,"score_spread":0.23462602449453962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200124202","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032007072,0.8803449,0.074247666,0.0053949645,0.0007754899,0.0029431833,0.0014880717,0.0002411948,0.0025573797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7873686,0.11812396,0.080124535,0.0024012672,0.00045062017,0.009990931,0.0010326274,0.00011180979,0.0003955769],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.8809795,0.09515124,0.012554212,0.004934111,0.005668497,0.0007124967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67584425,0.2940236,0.0140680745,0.010096945,0.005159511,0.0008075857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13810273,0.0028289482,0.007519704,0.014962089,0.0010872921,0.006303522,0.0036943727,0.0021919538,0.0023631216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26210722,0.001366015,0.026992003,0.012218493,0.00317633,0.0042612604,0.003873744,0.0031041896,0.0001600335],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012558182,0.0000978222,0.025018798,0.17114326,0.73819107,0.0002754107,0.0017612758,0.004254821,0.0006812331,0.014852974,0.0014141118,0.041053373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006466003,0.0007341084,0.014444008,0.05316861,0.87937945,0.00025709363,0.0010045082,0.004710519,0.0009875617,0.036571387,0.007957067,0.00013907865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024517996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003726071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13810273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031705452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00391922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73036575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205103961","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1286","title":"The role of original process in creating product essence and authenticity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Perception; Process (computing); Value (mathematics); Product (mathematics); Psychology; Object (grammar); Epistemology; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012447665524552433,"score_gpt":0.3234016227987885,"score_spread":0.310953957274236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205103961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93468404,0.000500278,0.024816653,0.0005000231,0.00004064201,0.00016244205,0.000018942625,0.00005883851,0.039218105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960146,0.00007214117,0.003421492,0.000025207984,0.000006343808,0.000015676012,0.0000063124203,0.000008854709,0.00042949783],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932187,0.0040003066,0.00028790918,0.00038815162,0.001831011,0.00027378227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599215,0.024684701,0.0063069514,0.0031887544,0.0045263004,0.0013718507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066780727,0.00032680103,0.0003037184,0.0015429541,0.0009041641,0.0056162085,0.0005481967,0.0008038461,0.0027566443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033815622,0.00030689925,0.00048425485,0.0006179005,0.003644745,0.0044002132,0.0039478005,0.0016104011,0.00018464244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022349344,0.0036107474,0.21862714,0.002796224,0.0004905882,0.002560975,0.14554878,0.0052579315,0.05417308,0.25431058,0.001087607,0.3093014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036980398,0.0052746944,0.6047511,0.0016369127,0.000634026,0.0052475273,0.07925975,0.03048095,0.041840196,0.19204286,0.037945043,0.00051712076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048466376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038638778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066780727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001155724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009830559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03531748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226494581","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1300","title":"The case for qualitative research","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Set (abstract data type); Consumer research; Process (computing); Psychology; Management science; Epistemology; Qualitative analysis; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Marketing; Computer science; Social science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.25112350338613937,"score_gpt":0.5099098500403135,"score_spread":0.25878634665417416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226494581","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003635628,0.009994857,0.06605681,0.8740867,0.0061436915,0.001175589,0.00015610924,0.00021496814,0.038535707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49263602,0.011238653,0.19705878,0.27066323,0.0045342995,0.012124369,0.00028709162,0.00055469346,0.01090293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.30865908,0.6291332,0.010754349,0.012860154,0.030650854,0.0079423385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.21859868,0.65803784,0.01386543,0.06162398,0.030888682,0.016985375],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5391089,0.001356179,0.003292513,0.005211721,0.016719967,0.031174159,0.008435163,0.022983719,0.014446299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51223475,0.0021091888,0.0027019163,0.0044921683,0.085757405,0.057875197,0.03125751,0.036399536,0.0031000653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113022266,0.00010374414,0.0008660834,0.0024565982,0.00008111951,0.0003753211,0.060178638,0.0003457134,0.0002553733,0.87550837,0.030429963,0.029286042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017812039,0.00011393032,0.000299612,0.0123934755,0.00004309437,0.00044561984,0.070065044,0.00098283,0.00028680428,0.66632164,0.24876931,0.00010056837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057238955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036854132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46089113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02191953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050302744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56836087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231619077","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1006","title":"Gift Giving at Israeli Weddings as a Function of Genetic Relatedness and Kinship Certainty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Kinship; Certainty; Lineage (genetic); Function (biology); Gift giving; Selection (genetic algorithm); Sociology; Genealogy; Social psychology; Psychology; Biology; Genetics; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Anthropology; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.046175579482988297,"score_gpt":0.37450981057239624,"score_spread":0.32833423108940796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231619077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984084,0.000065698136,0.000093453375,0.000045548666,0.000002659569,0.0000026829575,0.000021000787,0.0000032203845,0.0013573818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994961,0.000026165624,0.000069746384,0.000009189869,0.0000047971225,0.0000019206475,0.00002647999,0.0000013057669,0.00036429407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994862,0.00023082586,0.000027866516,0.00007430205,0.00009615556,0.00008455325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98970604,0.0042435536,0.0029620782,0.0005134423,0.0004633863,0.002111454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018244339,0.00013526452,0.00024257165,0.0005681414,0.00047056846,0.0010661229,0.00025081204,0.00033594324,0.00405234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010665208,0.00011405733,0.00017465554,0.00033301197,0.0005430326,0.00048661287,0.0006046696,0.00079313066,0.00036238966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009868476,0.00047072457,0.9737196,0.000023187757,0.0000972142,0.00023478088,0.0024165965,0.0005517148,0.0042893225,0.0009041899,0.00022632617,0.016079439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000702579,0.00011395444,0.9980147,0.000003922468,0.00001203403,0.000100600606,0.0007063817,0.00034656422,0.00020382553,0.00025540742,0.00022893524,0.0000067907185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013013608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018847173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00405234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044099704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016142908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013556421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236704525","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1060","title":"Issue Information","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.020749846900492364,"score_gpt":0.28915035907963477,"score_spread":0.2684005121791424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236704525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014757786,0.0005770464,0.00026285826,0.0017748248,0.0056529203,0.00015330676,0.019407483,0.0010060812,0.9710179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008596153,0.0004872879,0.00015529257,0.0007527093,0.0010542581,0.00005543954,0.007555069,0.0003467563,0.98873353],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990656,0.00007236484,0.00007339445,0.0001702056,0.00049998594,0.000118515294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996635,0.00050696766,0.0002558024,0.0004445118,0.001423389,0.00073428155],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007564347,0.001426906,0.0011637582,0.003234289,0.0016647206,0.008056895,0.0014295038,0.0024653326,0.9145376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051857904,0.00068440445,0.0006815637,0.0043772883,0.0006415723,0.004650435,0.0020608539,0.0025738804,0.8918491],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014623631,0.000013455562,0.000050401635,0.00010006398,8.408579e-7,0.0000132309315,0.000010316619,0.000017799359,0.000072538285,0.0009821573,0.9781858,0.020538844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070848314,0.000008478026,0.00028434067,0.00006300055,7.9192097e-7,0.000019402787,0.0000180814,0.000021892858,0.000043857326,0.00034129745,0.99918884,0.0000030088545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035162002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006703584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08546239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013187199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018205756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12190175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241276725","doi":"10.1016/s1057-7408(11)00060-x","title":"Editorial Board","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University; University of Toronto; The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Citation; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology","score_opus":0.059816508839576746,"score_gpt":0.2869215771898801,"score_spread":0.22710506835030336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241276725","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019471,0.0049879686,0.00046956286,0.04786585,0.8649151,0.0001410139,0.0006893894,0.0003695838,0.0803669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022201,0.004826261,0.0005092385,0.018627267,0.43026248,0.00018003548,0.0008339867,0.0004167999,0.5421238],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964283,0.00044703722,0.00034145647,0.00044444716,0.0020063422,0.00033228844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97628284,0.0025642756,0.0013140133,0.0011522642,0.015347589,0.0033388578],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004075718,0.0015807578,0.001303271,0.0040270025,0.0022603914,0.008286687,0.001782702,0.0049787415,0.27298427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025525669,0.00050793664,0.000802001,0.0017694606,0.00090145407,0.003335214,0.0018709655,0.004752587,0.20024632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009990794,0.000004066106,0.0000141983855,0.000052394113,0.0000012921116,0.000016791566,0.0000034747159,0.0000069107587,0.000030239526,0.00022346305,0.9910925,0.008544818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009603714,0.000006140149,0.00011918364,0.00008951804,0.000003896575,0.0000260895,0.000015098623,0.000035781562,0.00005093123,0.00041638414,0.9992235,0.000003744906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011468132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025739304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72701573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001960635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032192522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9132233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249165174","doi":"10.1016/s1057-7408(09)00116-8","title":"Editorial Board","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; University of Pittsburgh; University of Washington; Jain University; University of Minnesota; Ohio State University; Dartmouth College; University of Miami","keywords":"Editorial board; Citation; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology","score_opus":0.039689426026858,"score_gpt":0.2919837932613343,"score_spread":0.2522943672344763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249165174","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018663042,0.004811674,0.00044547353,0.04515859,0.87372476,0.0001451663,0.00062632235,0.00035365453,0.0745478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022448488,0.0047823815,0.00052549434,0.019932149,0.44631383,0.00018259324,0.00077622937,0.0003977234,0.5248448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966601,0.0004039438,0.00032223423,0.0004232051,0.0018897227,0.00030085474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769532,0.0024159225,0.0013180391,0.0010687541,0.015042141,0.0032019925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00395782,0.0015506108,0.0013187747,0.0038571693,0.0021821163,0.0076077734,0.0018166224,0.0049390676,0.25730333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023653477,0.000504217,0.00079446915,0.0016344415,0.0008431247,0.0030876657,0.0017132375,0.0047099907,0.19398613],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010088009,0.000004326725,0.000013924944,0.00005087804,0.0000012998793,0.000017316805,0.000003239118,0.00000641173,0.000032654338,0.00019824423,0.99140716,0.00825444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010657152,0.000006550277,0.00012902591,0.00008802798,0.0000041832354,0.00002784578,0.000014136595,0.000037529277,0.000054028143,0.00039394558,0.99923027,0.000003751863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011590895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002595755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25730333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018579661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030526216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8607654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252970193","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1026","title":"Issue Information","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Human auditory perception and evaluation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Technion-Israel Institute of Technology; Fudan University; University of Oxford; University of Alberta; University of Cincinnati; University of Pittsburgh; University of Washington; McGill University; Arizona State University; Universität zu Köln; Boston College; Washington University in St. Louis; University of South Carolina; University of Minnesota; Northwestern University; York University; University of Miami; George Washington University; University of Texas at San Antonio; University of Pennsylvania; Temple University; Vanderbilt University; University of Central Florida; San Diego State University; National University of Singapore; Ohio State University; University of Southern California; Florida State University; Nanyang Technological University; Georgetown University","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.027771081021503646,"score_gpt":0.3456304051189284,"score_spread":0.31785932409742473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252970193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036183174,0.00044453086,0.00086368393,0.0018449627,0.0056138313,0.00027379597,0.014130888,0.0028961727,0.9735702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006475163,0.00021773251,0.00028374285,0.00038134755,0.00050680677,0.00005353936,0.0043889675,0.00052226154,0.9929981],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926573,0.00007519337,0.00004309949,0.000115112976,0.0004087618,0.00009217674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964097,0.0004985018,0.00014009852,0.0004281274,0.0014644741,0.0010591309],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010661723,0.0011871301,0.0012674503,0.0046584606,0.0015724158,0.0067651034,0.0017447735,0.0022848241,0.95512545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006733397,0.0005283401,0.0007749072,0.0034370648,0.0005965206,0.0035263412,0.0022988205,0.0017149869,0.923197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022491142,0.000046548143,0.000057522164,0.00012060204,0.0000014658948,0.000018746408,0.000010150826,0.000036044614,0.00012128856,0.0011117785,0.9565974,0.041856032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020695248,0.000023341701,0.00033529932,0.000082046434,0.0000020439213,0.000028781596,0.00003598818,0.00010624091,0.00013974748,0.001546068,0.99767286,0.0000068736026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015469416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038017898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04487455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097339536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020698297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283162852","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1313","title":"How to overcome algorithm aversion: Learning from mistakes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Variety (cybernetics); Mediation; Moderation; Advice (programming); Loss aversion; Product (mathematics); Algorithm; Process (computing); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Economics; Machine learning; Microeconomics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10464647738916319,"score_gpt":0.30530597486133676,"score_spread":0.20065949747217357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283162852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9351427,0.0003570727,0.03845934,0.00660888,0.00008374908,0.00007637959,0.000030088344,0.00020894555,0.019032838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905515,0.0001212862,0.0072961254,0.00095048174,0.00001698591,0.000023117653,0.000017041857,0.000025946181,0.000997615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508095,0.0028671706,0.00018731646,0.00048469246,0.001063027,0.00031685998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94172317,0.037281055,0.008918436,0.006928074,0.0036536162,0.0014956606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009978222,0.0004144769,0.00035838012,0.0005623686,0.0006740976,0.0028249412,0.00089885655,0.00177909,0.00549911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072536685,0.00035916452,0.0003498793,0.0002937014,0.0035437779,0.0034258477,0.0015013961,0.0032401031,0.0007772223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020901805,0.0041691395,0.3369442,0.0018503286,0.00085465965,0.0011066195,0.034591123,0.013569524,0.043932952,0.11499637,0.010364279,0.43553057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071766024,0.0056519024,0.2526311,0.0018316392,0.0012726281,0.0018465691,0.027858136,0.11568963,0.060681213,0.46149182,0.06984231,0.000485383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011566806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012254642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009978222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007561193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012939675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052770495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289755119","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1323","title":"Rethinking scarcity and poverty: Building bridges for shared insight and impact","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Scarcity; Poverty; Leverage (statistics); Resource scarcity; Population; Resource (disambiguation); Development economics; Sociology; Construct (python library); Economics; Economic growth; Natural resource economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.05380889658434694,"score_gpt":0.3818721448854202,"score_spread":0.32806324830107325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289755119","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11968935,0.04711106,0.1466026,0.5692161,0.0044416534,0.00022311788,0.00030371998,0.00023469716,0.112177774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443309,0.014807331,0.021096565,0.014112347,0.0012923174,0.00025139033,0.00010822242,0.00013829509,0.003862631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932327,0.00469654,0.00018864065,0.00074237486,0.00065899355,0.00048068835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753363,0.018722963,0.0010987108,0.0020096647,0.0017259014,0.0011064572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020349499,0.0008913552,0.0013250457,0.0051562516,0.005479472,0.01583815,0.003027318,0.0041257646,0.007007773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02237315,0.00053034595,0.00072727335,0.0029009199,0.05027428,0.0362549,0.02079105,0.009969827,0.00049094745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003373626,0.000053119762,0.0027545057,0.00034298477,0.000042870666,0.0003134688,0.069626056,0.0005739389,0.0003165409,0.89122766,0.005005163,0.029710107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006017738,0.00002196083,0.001667068,0.00068683224,0.000020324302,0.00009703749,0.053321026,0.001016855,0.00017494707,0.8996938,0.043266557,0.000027617703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043723388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006719911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020349499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060152533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075237188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10761976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308752168","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1331","title":"The spiritual contagion scale: A measure of beliefs in the transfer of metaphysical properties","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Psychology; Disgust; Scale (ratio); Construct (python library); Discriminant validity; Social psychology; Metaphysics; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Developmental psychology; Psychometrics; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11995590662587134,"score_gpt":0.30641844753229613,"score_spread":0.18646254090642478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308752168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907665,0.00018315917,0.0010493469,0.00018784092,0.000026095238,0.00027136737,0.00028247733,0.000018942552,0.0072143087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99362975,0.00026945435,0.003936109,0.00012511994,0.000020332605,0.00036667954,0.00040635883,0.000005474864,0.0012405869],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989574,0.0002834169,0.00013152939,0.00005121777,0.0005274454,0.00004888376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342316,0.0021895424,0.0024932802,0.00033644345,0.00089368725,0.0006638828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017578722,0.00026334927,0.00028627433,0.0012016235,0.00042091793,0.0006683583,0.00041216545,0.00055260665,0.0039547463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102705415,0.00022586728,0.00044124137,0.0005755177,0.00053599686,0.00054567645,0.0008793318,0.0013051616,0.00043511493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045415483,0.0023838964,0.90341157,0.00040524517,0.000501016,0.00036444006,0.0074365586,0.00089444895,0.009468953,0.0017304589,0.0056687505,0.067280516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005876738,0.00039232653,0.99144113,0.00006692054,0.000061444895,0.00029906703,0.0018375494,0.0012275893,0.0011983578,0.0010753208,0.0023054122,0.000036165675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090747833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025593818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039547463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037525647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034069348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013229907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323315086","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1346","title":"Style, content, and the success of ideas","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Function (biology); Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Content (measure theory); Class (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Variance (accounting); Natural (archaeology); Writing style; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04070871232479893,"score_gpt":0.3619696436976745,"score_spread":0.32126093137287554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323315086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94952273,0.0011610668,0.0068539046,0.0013732715,0.00016404182,0.00014553798,0.00026653544,0.00018189767,0.040331047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99371815,0.00043699789,0.0033149498,0.0001317839,0.0002042708,0.000058293004,0.00015916758,0.00009304967,0.0018833631],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898699,0.0044279937,0.00080314715,0.0004879168,0.0041551013,0.0002559742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.702185,0.23291908,0.032304686,0.006508756,0.021343475,0.0047390023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013878096,0.0005813526,0.0005375781,0.007240307,0.001342165,0.011116031,0.00070431305,0.0010018164,0.0066655553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16644667,0.00032092456,0.000614486,0.006067527,0.002680648,0.0057278997,0.0024931189,0.0016251318,0.0014749083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021551605,0.0013254748,0.48358762,0.002129195,0.0010483499,0.0013617947,0.041658025,0.003765196,0.016226044,0.03436579,0.0077428734,0.40463445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004720823,0.0026436665,0.7793398,0.0015249194,0.0010314382,0.0014261763,0.02438787,0.024744371,0.017656047,0.10946883,0.03696975,0.00033494073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041854984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040697888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013878096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014875982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008473045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07339525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353079166","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1304","title":"Issue Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Internet privacy; Library science","score_opus":0.05672156392501933,"score_gpt":0.2954887991675297,"score_spread":0.23876723524251037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4353079166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020195758,0.00067417364,0.0005712124,0.0026296,0.013161059,0.00033507927,0.014711818,0.0016700604,0.9660451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005616904,0.0005014796,0.00026203095,0.00088575133,0.0014065134,0.00007135898,0.0061673224,0.0005232888,0.98962057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991736,0.00008226755,0.000063073356,0.00013684604,0.0004374834,0.00010665174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676776,0.00035568292,0.00011786937,0.0003198188,0.0012867757,0.0011521126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010587097,0.0016077008,0.0013385019,0.0026373924,0.0016393939,0.007868617,0.0016669855,0.0020720183,0.9366295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005236469,0.0005330906,0.0008160041,0.0026438509,0.00057682476,0.004871512,0.0020656746,0.002112384,0.90223294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014605116,0.000011739123,0.000025150328,0.00008190529,8.8074995e-7,0.000011667289,0.0000050099434,0.00001731941,0.000070924296,0.0008402288,0.9771942,0.021726377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007213033,0.0000074376217,0.00013652725,0.000051843774,6.8031574e-7,0.000019553465,0.0000148631125,0.00002547042,0.000038930568,0.00041852647,0.9992761,0.0000028763243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00251482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004052207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063370526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001423786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019063343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090390384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366489390","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1354","title":"Mental accounting of product returns","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mental accounting; Product (mathematics); Lottery; Purchasing; Economics; Revenue; Value (mathematics); Monetary economics; Business; Fungibility; Time value of money; Microeconomics; Marketing; Accounting; Finance","score_opus":0.2204257693242787,"score_gpt":0.5006127997533809,"score_spread":0.2801870304291022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366489390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9638701,0.00016736209,0.008212603,0.0006092691,0.0000373059,0.000054730852,0.000095330215,0.000089060966,0.026864259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878925,0.000026011843,0.00079681416,0.000036926485,0.0000064815445,0.0000059452705,0.000033586086,0.000008323905,0.00029681777],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790144,0.0008211671,0.000118334756,0.0002267913,0.00076313346,0.0001690713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97791195,0.009291637,0.0056884554,0.0049965098,0.0013950847,0.0007163742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022548866,0.0004794279,0.0002963883,0.0009629573,0.0005629878,0.0023939528,0.00075543835,0.00066451886,0.0060091754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03527005,0.0002633593,0.00040393835,0.00057710876,0.0020075773,0.0028148512,0.001648071,0.0012450288,0.00022537573],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003118416,0.0016278811,0.3806493,0.0009718947,0.00048657408,0.0010610311,0.008864119,0.014114003,0.046485912,0.14543602,0.0040782485,0.3931065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001646692,0.001547264,0.7162547,0.0002524582,0.00040471627,0.0009629746,0.0046373764,0.07047397,0.017656213,0.17887439,0.008505069,0.00026627776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022678669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012669867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060091754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011476852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005670383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02010262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367059815","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1357","title":"The digital frontier as a liminal space","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liminality; Metaverse; Metaphor; Possible world; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Virtual reality; Human–computer interaction; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03191957786622684,"score_gpt":0.3101797243876665,"score_spread":0.27826014652143966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367059815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04868085,0.06815335,0.02238609,0.35868925,0.01078149,0.00003453217,0.000104220664,0.00016718768,0.49100298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93166786,0.016920047,0.0026824279,0.021894699,0.0030654657,0.000039103194,0.000034041615,0.00009498746,0.02360132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99724364,0.0018154634,0.000059397255,0.00022412658,0.0004516734,0.00020571052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959709,0.0025604416,0.00026407628,0.00035846347,0.00056243833,0.00028370778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025162762,0.00034466863,0.000341927,0.0014027489,0.0047441684,0.014448959,0.0011051549,0.004475292,0.0069673876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062921853,0.00016429256,0.00034053565,0.0013096163,0.024953801,0.019351088,0.0055406005,0.004642644,0.0009804817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002293384,0.000008603924,0.00014789215,0.00008907235,0.0000029130367,0.00021141724,0.013835871,0.000057484536,0.00009821524,0.9624133,0.013724395,0.009387853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014460699,0.000026499873,0.0005265213,0.0006679007,0.0000101379355,0.00061099126,0.037710458,0.0004782948,0.00040329425,0.2540725,0.70545536,0.000023533381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017056357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023262426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014448959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029121437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017514845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023308277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377943582","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1364","title":"Getting political: The value‐protective effects of expressed outgroup outrage on self‐brand connection","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Trent University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outrage; Premise; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Advertising; Brand engagement; Politics; Psychology; Social media; Marketing; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.026381069078898235,"score_gpt":0.3770577846298936,"score_spread":0.35067671555099533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377943582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99034166,0.00007082694,0.00019702055,0.00016253923,0.000015492402,0.00001613709,0.000012457343,0.00001009999,0.00917383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987091,0.00005846745,0.00020356919,0.000076485565,0.000008738796,0.000016294318,0.000010881086,0.000008265224,0.000908238],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991561,0.00046940564,0.000023698109,0.000100795514,0.00015534936,0.00009467138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99033594,0.00630949,0.0014100829,0.00081871415,0.00025674322,0.00086899323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011800926,0.0003407612,0.00024158749,0.00029757607,0.00083157414,0.0013951914,0.00038035345,0.0007331249,0.012363534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009951328,0.00022738436,0.00021152667,0.00015778551,0.0018241681,0.00117166,0.0014122106,0.0016223707,0.00051583647],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03560126,0.044838518,0.16159976,0.0025993343,0.0007253335,0.002095721,0.07393588,0.0043613142,0.34931403,0.052209258,0.0041272016,0.26859242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011840914,0.017233068,0.87023604,0.00047545202,0.0007656148,0.0009049845,0.024357922,0.005543991,0.039491847,0.031146066,0.008492318,0.00016868112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007278589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087404205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012363534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036558756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003297215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04136008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381851830","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1305","title":"Issue Information","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science","score_opus":0.05672156392501933,"score_gpt":0.2954887991675297,"score_spread":0.23876723524251037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381851830","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020195758,0.00067417364,0.0005712124,0.0026296,0.013161059,0.00033507927,0.014711818,0.0016700604,0.9660451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005616904,0.0005014796,0.00026203095,0.00088575133,0.0014065134,0.00007135898,0.0061673224,0.0005232888,0.98962057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991736,0.00008226755,0.000063073356,0.00013684604,0.0004374834,0.00010665174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676776,0.00035568292,0.00011786937,0.0003198188,0.0012867757,0.0011521126],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010587097,0.0016077008,0.0013385019,0.0026373924,0.0016393939,0.007868617,0.0016669855,0.0020720183,0.9366295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005236469,0.0005330906,0.0008160041,0.0026438509,0.00057682476,0.004871512,0.0020656746,0.002112384,0.90223294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014605116,0.000011739123,0.000025150328,0.00008190529,8.8074995e-7,0.000011667289,0.0000050099434,0.00001731941,0.000070924296,0.0008402288,0.9771942,0.021726377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007213033,0.0000074376217,0.00013652725,0.000051843774,6.8031574e-7,0.000019553465,0.0000148631125,0.00002547042,0.000038930568,0.00041852647,0.9992761,0.0000028763243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00251482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004052207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063370526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001423786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019063343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.090390384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383104799","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1373","title":"Perceived corruption reduces algorithm aversion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Language change; Salience (neuroscience); Inequity aversion; Injustice; Leverage (statistics); Scholarship; Axiom; Diversity (politics); Context (archaeology); Economics; Democracy; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Inequality; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.13695424656267535,"score_gpt":0.3595646520250577,"score_spread":0.22261040546238237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383104799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948514,0.00003228374,0.00048589284,0.00015950586,0.00000750493,0.0000055827836,0.000011496486,0.0000072596827,0.004439154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991679,0.000019366793,0.00021442516,0.00006559873,0.0000034456805,0.000004688709,0.0000127539015,0.000004610808,0.00050725066],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990145,0.0004905007,0.000056984467,0.00012524426,0.0001902577,0.0001225167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834427,0.007920921,0.0051188515,0.001550492,0.00091391307,0.0010530166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014124311,0.00018564798,0.00021203957,0.0003217778,0.00041223303,0.0015688601,0.00021308128,0.0005736948,0.009115873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019508742,0.00016460603,0.00016579198,0.00015717559,0.0008466299,0.0006387624,0.0009711606,0.0010881065,0.0004533097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035209933,0.0062855617,0.79367214,0.00049995555,0.00034091895,0.0006192396,0.019471576,0.0029878563,0.054929897,0.019171298,0.0038254096,0.09467515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015461617,0.0015293357,0.9546599,0.00016062516,0.00014753324,0.00040309445,0.0073275645,0.0066774753,0.009601705,0.013830859,0.005442082,0.00006526681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010218702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097027916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009115873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032144698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002993568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030495644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384133227","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1377","title":"<scp>PassivePy</scp>: A tool to automatically identify passive voice in big text data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Attribution; Computer science; Relevance (law); Deception; Voice analysis; Psychology; Python (programming language); Passive voice; Data science; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Speech recognition; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04559678330392432,"score_gpt":0.35054895507893064,"score_spread":0.30495217177500633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384133227","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":"software","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017137969,0.0002611395,0.13197987,0.0011581251,0.00043427912,0.0015532153,0.17925636,0.6638372,0.004381778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15359065,0.0004678168,0.46683908,0.0017320783,0.0005849554,0.009225211,0.26911137,0.08380858,0.014640328],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957569,0.0011301553,0.00056482904,0.0011407717,0.0011823382,0.00022505583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679363,0.019569669,0.003643036,0.0044244695,0.0034668862,0.0009596637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006692471,0.0028131532,0.0009797409,0.006440271,0.0010386212,0.0027575972,0.0014348058,0.0012038987,0.034447838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042419154,0.0009391878,0.0011753337,0.0036238215,0.0010187377,0.004126511,0.0043748054,0.0018879493,0.027444983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012313769,0.0003782952,0.016459575,0.003617696,0.00039632915,0.0010549363,0.0031358916,0.002336951,0.014767961,0.0034136055,0.69256014,0.26064727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001119519,0.00074508647,0.11298504,0.0016100453,0.00023878664,0.0015496418,0.0023969482,0.28266945,0.07991975,0.043758113,0.47200134,0.0010062471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025009066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004571349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034447838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076361495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021842301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11523956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387104359","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1383","title":"Consumer insights from text analysis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.03481380192276312,"score_gpt":0.3748412511675557,"score_spread":0.34002744924479256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387104359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26825997,0.010029267,0.08153691,0.04151753,0.0027615882,0.001278699,0.013725826,0.001649081,0.5792412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83348733,0.008676169,0.07201077,0.0048342184,0.0024030565,0.0015012752,0.009795955,0.0014499854,0.06584129],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917406,0.0036077339,0.00044624828,0.0006891472,0.0031970553,0.000319154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683206,0.022856772,0.001374496,0.0016203584,0.005353018,0.0004748127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069188373,0.0010218697,0.00049828977,0.009834879,0.0024015354,0.011592844,0.0010083618,0.0019536994,0.024095116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028893322,0.00040584046,0.0005080916,0.008700184,0.003741917,0.011123424,0.0052349563,0.002024654,0.005422974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049417006,0.0001575167,0.0075040595,0.0021051306,0.00006315033,0.0028012493,0.46873888,0.00046760606,0.0071112053,0.0805849,0.092522494,0.3374497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058287886,0.0001093804,0.011269086,0.001539176,0.000050824954,0.0017991994,0.2404381,0.0032696198,0.0035898483,0.065778844,0.67199737,0.000100301426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013060183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001913343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024095116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030214824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016698733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08060622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388419024","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1395","title":"When cash costs you: The pain of holding coins over banknotes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cash; Purchasing; Incentive; Economics; Donation; Purchasing power; Power (physics); Monetary economics; Business; Demographic economics; Marketing; Finance; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03840024707187429,"score_gpt":0.37292752823457487,"score_spread":0.3345272811627006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388419024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99706715,0.00010835597,0.00019858243,0.0002238417,0.000016539014,0.00000743118,0.000021044783,0.0000033515405,0.0023536584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991296,0.00009199462,0.00020495916,0.00013912648,0.0000074814884,0.0000090787635,0.000013438467,0.0000015392981,0.00040275304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995358,0.00025056818,0.000020058469,0.000035508314,0.00009083152,0.000067310815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961016,0.0017670317,0.0014018147,0.0001914722,0.00019148899,0.00034653416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010939294,0.00023638405,0.00023722778,0.00036110368,0.0006679231,0.0017183201,0.0002454102,0.0006015042,0.0056225737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067796563,0.00021967484,0.00024210908,0.00023407889,0.0016608601,0.0009249309,0.000799296,0.0010762839,0.00023641672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009852548,0.004686095,0.63059866,0.0017929209,0.0007102222,0.002666378,0.122561,0.0017565448,0.076603025,0.016134016,0.007858478,0.12478011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002549961,0.003371696,0.8629243,0.0003517805,0.000329214,0.001540962,0.10988819,0.0016812827,0.004849405,0.007884133,0.0067554517,0.0001685008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010027488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001612718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056225737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044022503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026074148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018809378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389274685","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1401","title":"How rejected recommendations shape recommenders' future product intentions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Oregon State University","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Salient; Outcome (game theory); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Computer science; Business; Economics; Microeconomics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06942828736507858,"score_gpt":0.3294402459328675,"score_spread":0.2600119585677889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389274685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957242,0.000091068294,0.00086280203,0.00021993397,0.000009311892,0.000012234988,0.00004244247,0.00001300092,0.003025076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986847,0.00004606691,0.00052994204,0.00005505086,0.000007290992,0.000006171554,0.00006821559,0.0000064489723,0.0005962419],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975037,0.0010989854,0.00022304516,0.00035160745,0.00065764884,0.00016496994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.935769,0.041548833,0.010897995,0.004037873,0.005566663,0.002179526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005149456,0.00019768107,0.00038110785,0.00060246605,0.00062961935,0.003285426,0.00057502126,0.0019384107,0.004813577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050164197,0.00033641563,0.0005144064,0.00042762657,0.00072551373,0.0018112005,0.0006286198,0.001932224,0.0010246758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005624286,0.00069370365,0.9655075,0.00008694112,0.00020136741,0.0001474277,0.0034368408,0.0015493183,0.0024666877,0.0011972222,0.00057409116,0.023576591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053433516,0.0006686223,0.9743361,0.000062175066,0.00017983458,0.00015603601,0.0035153315,0.016001236,0.0010903624,0.0022542148,0.001610368,0.00007222635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009227544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008831167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009227544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061246357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004567311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027233243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390598840","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1360","title":"Issue Information","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Legal case studies and regulations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.023969418352529238,"score_gpt":0.4010695297587587,"score_spread":0.37710011140622945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390598840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019930532,0.0005148136,0.00046738566,0.0022729866,0.008104421,0.00033601274,0.012006051,0.0012061152,0.974893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006453313,0.00045140903,0.0002710255,0.00092106324,0.0010855903,0.00009203475,0.005193573,0.00042580554,0.9909142],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991202,0.000086841974,0.00006050308,0.00013747376,0.00048396393,0.00011111092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673444,0.00041591632,0.00013100074,0.00034685121,0.0012853633,0.0010863488],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001130333,0.0013876503,0.0011786558,0.0027274718,0.0018693213,0.0073509915,0.0015768763,0.002266553,0.9394286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054684267,0.0005484941,0.0007658624,0.0024183379,0.00057768496,0.0042686295,0.0020078141,0.0021015843,0.89357543],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014684881,0.000014001617,0.00003087722,0.00008225763,9.433267e-7,0.000013598972,0.000007275182,0.000013689851,0.00007616879,0.0010481649,0.9762582,0.022440128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069794655,0.000007643981,0.0001587147,0.000054031436,7.7664106e-7,0.000022997898,0.000020389665,0.00002109108,0.000041996856,0.00043333948,0.9992292,0.0000028764332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023956115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039166557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060571373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013113961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020143413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08639771},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390655214","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1406","title":"An integrative theory of resource discrepancies","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Scarcity; Psychology; Class (philosophy); Resource dependence theory; Poverty; Social psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Economics; Microeconomics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07925118628452628,"score_gpt":0.44048681018037855,"score_spread":0.3612356238958523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390655214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23377961,0.0030548142,0.14618532,0.013002109,0.00027584014,0.00020066589,0.00015170679,0.00009511095,0.60325474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898572,0.0004098694,0.00672753,0.00030113469,0.000057720397,0.00008985511,0.000046514073,0.000016206057,0.00249403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969885,0.001572439,0.00012178111,0.00040712376,0.0006685651,0.00024164731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959758,0.0021156156,0.00052594586,0.0004540743,0.0005562769,0.00037231072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003444408,0.00059971446,0.0004918665,0.0026785694,0.0018193751,0.004928952,0.0015519336,0.0013302882,0.0053294925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005721652,0.00030744923,0.00070251815,0.0018963639,0.01374278,0.0077583627,0.0052118246,0.0023811324,0.00027452718],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010706153,0.000039360675,0.0011557956,0.000029617016,0.000010208403,0.00006569469,0.004644208,0.0005913656,0.000098654025,0.98809785,0.00027439487,0.0049820896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018743236,0.0000335887,0.0019647155,0.00010068345,0.000019018475,0.00012118213,0.0053083226,0.0042392407,0.0001221377,0.977786,0.010273302,0.00001303912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018534536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010527917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053294925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034277888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017945169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024870455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390823160","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1409","title":"More the merrier: Effects of plural brand names on perceived entitativity and brand attitude","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Plural; Psychology; Brand names; Advertising; Perception; Reading (process); Brand management; Social psychology; Marketing; Linguistics; Business","score_opus":0.019390972636544775,"score_gpt":0.31686468040947535,"score_spread":0.2974737077729306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390823160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99068284,0.000077727396,0.0003068835,0.00014737286,0.000016318856,0.000003725265,0.000012590409,0.0000069611388,0.00874552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990108,0.000028564513,0.00017091814,0.00004575418,0.000010225516,0.000002057567,0.000010352932,0.000006557457,0.0007148215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853754,0.0006903052,0.00008216251,0.00024984,0.00037337636,0.00006675593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878243,0.006671585,0.0030073829,0.0010416268,0.0008984108,0.00055667077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028713946,0.00018684757,0.00024485955,0.00049253507,0.0008153539,0.002678204,0.00023044542,0.00062227645,0.007672269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014924243,0.00014200983,0.00021632799,0.00036862056,0.0014112822,0.0023610967,0.0010967384,0.0006411649,0.0004337458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005762836,0.001361627,0.6469058,0.0005857756,0.0003564682,0.0010474472,0.10306209,0.0004934814,0.09705184,0.027769653,0.0019187254,0.113684215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036463567,0.0005179862,0.9590853,0.000071086746,0.00011786366,0.0003519702,0.021784812,0.0009776548,0.004281041,0.006028738,0.0066696033,0.000077468016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012836551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016527899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007672269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004638437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001651399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025666356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391445781","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1412","title":"The different roads not taken: Considering diverse foregone alternatives motivates future goal persistence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Deliberation; Context (archaeology); Diversity (politics); Economics; Goal pursuit; Psychology; Goal setting; Persistence (discontinuity); Action (physics); Marketing; Microeconomics; Public economics; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.09572932202232154,"score_gpt":0.4125891705183004,"score_spread":0.31685984849597887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391445781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944385,0.00004007837,0.00074349623,0.00021697901,0.000004540666,0.000009500981,0.000008293323,0.0000056808144,0.004532987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871516,0.000030217441,0.0008925625,0.000063137675,0.000002568068,0.000007172762,0.000016330743,0.0000050929866,0.0002677228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909186,0.00045912963,0.000032506236,0.00010819623,0.00020135834,0.000106907166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99386746,0.0033249091,0.0013798802,0.0005285162,0.00030832924,0.00059089315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016429293,0.00013911232,0.00017533616,0.00028732183,0.00068642624,0.002301138,0.00028291257,0.0007747964,0.005050594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009875705,0.00025203842,0.00032688203,0.00021134764,0.0011425078,0.0010684183,0.0012253999,0.0015405149,0.0002576006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0047426852,0.008368507,0.6693651,0.0008969428,0.0006507667,0.001216649,0.039594926,0.0047044335,0.053380545,0.051908683,0.0034144926,0.16175629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002586898,0.0016928612,0.896267,0.00024879925,0.00035784882,0.00044614455,0.021614498,0.011974741,0.0059460136,0.05168835,0.009374952,0.00013011003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011204979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00288204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005050594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043959357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005484818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01689595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399182819","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1420","title":"When anthropomorphized brands push their gender boundaries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Perception; Disadvantage; Social psychology; Product (mathematics); Product category; Advertising; Business; Mathematics; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06062016999813567,"score_gpt":0.3259380933747241,"score_spread":0.26531792337658844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399182819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829153,0.000046181838,0.0011855846,0.00015532965,0.000019292309,0.000011627957,0.000018718303,0.00001376178,0.015634261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990109,0.000016916478,0.00040274646,0.000083909996,0.000003490413,0.0000046686764,0.000014775528,0.000006319032,0.00045622035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898547,0.00037049365,0.000050308987,0.00015120595,0.00035380168,0.00008875775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963128,0.0011039592,0.0013594538,0.0006635636,0.00033053348,0.00022967621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011731918,0.0002114938,0.00020130414,0.00041211434,0.00067543914,0.0020104684,0.00022892166,0.00056408084,0.008011122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066509447,0.0002273009,0.00013840024,0.00019978055,0.0015826947,0.001298807,0.001887456,0.0007366665,0.0003362603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036376407,0.0010036022,0.49298674,0.0005210501,0.00021925599,0.001710856,0.050292995,0.0014726475,0.25274837,0.06542193,0.0025866185,0.12739825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010663804,0.0015426502,0.85895294,0.0002625061,0.00012555797,0.0018814836,0.05239556,0.0034484444,0.028095094,0.03360743,0.019449174,0.00013253573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005909382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00084140146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008011122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036674493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024750954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026799917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400990988","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1433","title":"Collective consciousness and consumer behavior","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Consciousness; Construct (python library); Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Collective unconscious; Unitary state; Consumer behaviour; Social psychology; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Computer science; Political science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.035707419040236305,"score_gpt":0.3221062265347361,"score_spread":0.28639880749449975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400990988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75055766,0.0039542327,0.0039166324,0.03037489,0.0001590149,0.000044223936,0.000034989684,0.000029955618,0.21092837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823654,0.00028360702,0.00024019886,0.00033446247,0.000027406533,0.0000054994653,0.0000049808486,0.0000022158565,0.0008651106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990125,0.0005454596,0.00002537202,0.00009057417,0.00023293681,0.00009310753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523133,0.0025891936,0.0010572557,0.00020710337,0.0004225271,0.00049261854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019852275,0.00013890355,0.00018041722,0.0010181668,0.0011744804,0.0027731445,0.0002374131,0.0012138139,0.0037699924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00525227,0.000089617526,0.00018343005,0.0006089038,0.004319958,0.0013619141,0.0015002063,0.00097473216,0.000102134734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012523241,0.00037252903,0.13988341,0.000336924,0.00014738615,0.00061409257,0.07212352,0.00082155043,0.0013326249,0.7085201,0.006897114,0.06882547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045365578,0.00023583467,0.22634828,0.0004871927,0.0000967023,0.0007461555,0.07952693,0.0043738927,0.0007353542,0.59486246,0.09244912,0.00009271273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025212467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023386446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037699924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016280247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009232492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012611866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401641682","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1438","title":"Money can buy me love: Gifts are a more effective form of acute social support than conversations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Marketing; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.021503832174377197,"score_gpt":0.3717234674891093,"score_spread":0.3502196353147321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401641682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897793,0.00075683626,0.0007501778,0.0007814974,0.00010006997,0.000074899785,0.00004405471,0.000059476493,0.007653667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784577,0.00025317233,0.0010838563,0.00016519956,0.000038998533,0.000045162964,0.000021257578,0.0000062419253,0.0005403768],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882466,0.00079744606,0.00006316748,0.000076645214,0.00015267555,0.00008541655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499375,0.002573791,0.0007997003,0.00027688785,0.0001335704,0.0012224102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018902951,0.00016133014,0.00028240323,0.00029830923,0.00063283014,0.0011447192,0.00020392587,0.000736644,0.008126623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010590816,0.0001433599,0.00032386507,0.00019600427,0.0005635174,0.0010375066,0.0010473732,0.0007118542,0.00036956638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015130785,0.018533438,0.078020684,0.004689345,0.0010600715,0.00086306164,0.018764434,0.0007182207,0.041065834,0.0054330835,0.007993755,0.80772734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046515595,0.035189,0.8371835,0.0020417685,0.0019097938,0.00293325,0.035389505,0.0030259544,0.021366792,0.009823227,0.046233844,0.00025173515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025142543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041171422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008126623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021311929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029283128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027186215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406410296","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1447","title":"Food categorization determines whether healthier food is inferred to be tastier or less tasty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Psychology; Food labeling; Food science; Advertising; Business; Computer science; Chemistry; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07841075455111997,"score_gpt":0.39607716665049053,"score_spread":0.3176664120993706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406410296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97935975,0.00028554542,0.0024760768,0.0008095405,0.000043875338,0.000020966945,0.00008571798,0.000021297168,0.016897185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980987,0.00013054954,0.0009684273,0.0003235764,0.000012678052,0.000006110177,0.000067157715,0.000008183005,0.00038456958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930525,0.00029660403,0.000027575503,0.00015645324,0.00015400651,0.000060141992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99412054,0.0029796888,0.0012931543,0.00039539585,0.0009432473,0.00026792506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020129038,0.00015627132,0.00019864373,0.0004813023,0.0004816529,0.002423557,0.00026018644,0.000998216,0.005684597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013113945,0.00022050753,0.0002576033,0.00039468493,0.0012465703,0.0012062616,0.0005672951,0.00089188194,0.00039825693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035616464,0.0008870862,0.783506,0.0008302213,0.0004941552,0.00056188845,0.025641324,0.0010541378,0.054675896,0.020981846,0.005219553,0.10258632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010878185,0.0003559039,0.95375496,0.00022000374,0.00021679747,0.00025265466,0.010134293,0.0039625815,0.003165327,0.023873348,0.0038831024,0.00007219147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050479546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005177755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005684597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053122884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033383368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019016802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407824391","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1451","title":"Awe‐inspired: Appraising awe's consequences for consumers and brands","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Advertising; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.062115814668804746,"score_gpt":0.3824482611613,"score_spread":0.32033244649249526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407824391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96494675,0.00037417928,0.0017711535,0.00081903365,0.000048651593,0.000060045484,0.000037090198,0.000011908814,0.03193111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857986,0.0001209364,0.0006472938,0.0000994109,0.000013835474,0.000015107429,0.000013713622,0.0000029153439,0.0005070488],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987147,0.0006663029,0.000065126755,0.000057025747,0.0004004829,0.000096428055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912595,0.0048762653,0.0013732715,0.00036397149,0.0016496005,0.00047735957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031332227,0.00022976549,0.00016338305,0.0011741857,0.0008945069,0.002822751,0.00028351415,0.00082224293,0.002870296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016983828,0.000113774564,0.0003744369,0.0005042869,0.0018207125,0.002099809,0.0018083259,0.0009884641,0.00016657049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014429477,0.00089984696,0.6187187,0.0010207698,0.00033866253,0.0016062157,0.11820505,0.002189893,0.009876092,0.061848603,0.0035432838,0.18030983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046712674,0.0009826148,0.7730126,0.00043930125,0.00022845725,0.0008812005,0.14886305,0.0065043103,0.0042480123,0.047579452,0.01707719,0.00013705337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010933726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020799767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031332227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003500826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01657027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408418311","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.1454","title":"“It's a tough job, but somebody's got to do it”: Committed consumers' voluntary emotion work in alternative market systems","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Work (physics); Social psychology; Turnover intention; Turnover; Job satisfaction; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.029244556531178505,"score_gpt":0.39577716702577326,"score_spread":0.36653261049459473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408418311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890372,0.00008980182,0.0010707801,0.0007530288,0.00003116634,0.000012261028,0.0000051764882,0.0000047296626,0.008995813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933964,0.000025693837,0.00011889551,0.000064815395,0.0000036860765,0.000004446482,0.0000026307473,0.0000027116846,0.00043750604],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972953,0.0018204604,0.00006284855,0.00015372768,0.00031309167,0.00035446213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952507,0.0024265589,0.0009767413,0.0003204391,0.0003600168,0.00066547876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042695967,0.0001865407,0.0002027589,0.00049186975,0.0036712773,0.0044536134,0.0004587714,0.00089008,0.0020613472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068294257,0.0001909739,0.0001730354,0.00035570282,0.009751987,0.0019398679,0.003996666,0.0014061749,0.00014776729],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012383008,0.000121746554,0.051409483,0.0000863277,0.00001820157,0.00081585726,0.9162043,0.000108223234,0.0023364874,0.016789285,0.00092683523,0.011059456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013670048,0.00009335851,0.040109012,0.00009885547,0.000011375997,0.0003969555,0.94144243,0.0005180002,0.00039654798,0.0054566604,0.011430989,0.000032029184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024793078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004031572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044536134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012927897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012460136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022580087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412119404","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.70000","title":"The charity capacity curse","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Leeds","keywords":"Curse; Psychology; Positive economics; Law and economics; Economics; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.04464868122383963,"score_gpt":0.4170104014458407,"score_spread":0.37236172022200104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412119404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8803602,0.0013646152,0.007220756,0.011851066,0.0002165288,0.00013773714,0.00008628829,0.00010417501,0.09865867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967277,0.00009456854,0.0006391036,0.0010917359,0.000018335064,0.000029017989,0.000007699157,0.000010571542,0.0013812158],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98931855,0.0071830275,0.00030757117,0.000563181,0.0020552878,0.0005724155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9029145,0.060529847,0.019038262,0.008036455,0.0064287167,0.0030520842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01191308,0.00023019507,0.00024799164,0.00064861274,0.0017731847,0.0025556788,0.00082150096,0.0014646581,0.009091346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06885195,0.00025324424,0.00028764692,0.00040295455,0.0039730584,0.002241674,0.0036326956,0.002699688,0.00046952712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036751346,0.002541249,0.23918983,0.00306847,0.00064330583,0.0017434278,0.05862724,0.0048292177,0.036217943,0.23324282,0.02529481,0.39092654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004774087,0.003988715,0.5033109,0.003612477,0.0005785566,0.0028524143,0.06897217,0.010741569,0.038575813,0.14747025,0.21890467,0.00051497953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018898642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027096637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01191308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021324402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020158256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06300312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415778228","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.70006","title":"From kurtas to crop tops: A theory of postliminal self‐transformation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Professional Staff Congress and City University of New York","keywords":"Liminality; Reflexivity; Identity (music); Consumption (sociology); Embodied cognition; Clothing; Process (computing); Transformative learning; Imperfect; Constructive","score_opus":0.027058936213889023,"score_gpt":0.3215716520087663,"score_spread":0.29451271579487726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415778228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13267538,0.0013525843,0.11180076,0.0075012795,0.0003029668,0.00011086362,0.00008380349,0.0001463753,0.7460259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848017,0.00020969844,0.004799755,0.0002257447,0.00003061516,0.000045904653,0.00001941219,0.000034569122,0.009832503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986798,0.0007060238,0.00003314324,0.00017888314,0.00020491575,0.00019728801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990081,0.00039244522,0.00011938306,0.00019325077,0.00014396061,0.00014288255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019000489,0.0003188052,0.00024682423,0.0011904654,0.0030993256,0.005004791,0.001138745,0.0010584173,0.007221122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023646804,0.00022544687,0.0006112975,0.0008409214,0.020975739,0.007265811,0.0031843204,0.0025514318,0.00082098483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007207951,0.000010028926,0.00021769482,0.000010706958,0.0000016737147,0.00005642458,0.00724535,0.00022668176,0.000054976135,0.9892942,0.0002895626,0.002585604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014351002,0.000025476058,0.00065778696,0.00004959529,0.000007026089,0.00014362017,0.00984436,0.0040204762,0.00018573251,0.96024334,0.024794595,0.000013491126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031649498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024900923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007221122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037825042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015815625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027444184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116843608","doi":"10.1002/jcpy.70017","title":"Impatience for negative experiences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Patience; Set (abstract data type); Time preference; Dynamic inconsistency; Intertemporal choice; Consumer behaviour","score_opus":0.03757327549946064,"score_gpt":0.3556020847893831,"score_spread":0.31802880928992244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116843608","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34219083,0.0053978437,0.016859187,0.08519564,0.0033465861,0.00008782278,0.00008991289,0.00010802407,0.54672414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911247,0.0005016597,0.0003093959,0.0026829103,0.00042685075,0.000014486214,0.000010532866,0.00001283197,0.0049165282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828905,0.0010371433,0.000059850023,0.00013421752,0.00030400697,0.00017566842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560827,0.002071896,0.0008158572,0.0004074692,0.00046005662,0.0006364673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013857689,0.00024156766,0.00017971381,0.00046998385,0.0015775822,0.0033831822,0.00050335,0.0015284081,0.005131019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010606872,0.000107022795,0.00031894716,0.00023647399,0.010023454,0.0023254836,0.0029137142,0.002919043,0.0003787489],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032431065,0.00012279926,0.011554701,0.00048065156,0.00010666065,0.0037893348,0.07559422,0.00046264424,0.0052833343,0.78015566,0.026544709,0.09558105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007946636,0.000344767,0.054833226,0.0011327622,0.00010807939,0.0073474254,0.0923019,0.001900212,0.003728867,0.41406214,0.4239767,0.00018444475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047404724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000670293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005131019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000943013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004280809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017164946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W850570806","doi":"10.1016/j.jcps.2015.05.007","title":"Testosterone at your fingertips: Digit ratios (2D:4D and <i>rel</i>2) as predictors of courtship‐related consumption intended to acquire and retain mates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Psychology","topic":"Sexual Differentiation and Disorders","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Concordia University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Courtship; Digit ratio; Testosterone (patch); Psychology; Numerical digit; Consumption (sociology); Developmental psychology; Mating; Endocrinology; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.034573466700646795,"score_gpt":0.32418803690514986,"score_spread":0.28961457020450304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W850570806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99888736,0.00020769158,0.00007184532,0.000024734001,0.0000047759922,0.000002426702,0.00017701183,0.0000036376966,0.0006205314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993561,0.00006571573,0.000099697696,0.00000833597,0.0000030387312,0.0000016808118,0.00006810337,0.0000013503513,0.00039593162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99986327,0.0000417065,0.000013505297,0.00002510894,0.00003723509,0.000019194715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987821,0.00033082414,0.0005873701,0.00004193733,0.000057837264,0.00019994001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002768916,0.00019095186,0.0001168908,0.00040129677,0.00017468119,0.00042468397,0.00014145761,0.00017633053,0.0045781867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015697709,0.00010895591,0.000193356,0.0003593877,0.00016271204,0.00012264779,0.00016064933,0.00030124726,0.00029363504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021468537,0.000056089328,0.99453497,0.000011651848,0.000045872912,0.000045796285,0.00007379908,0.00005085044,0.0010992305,0.000050677314,0.00007223736,0.003744249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022672314,0.00006464444,0.9991736,0.0000037630844,0.000016397791,0.00011166236,0.000071473645,0.00014668169,0.0002870913,0.000022143848,0.00009826868,0.0000019795257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025651373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003434657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045781867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013146533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013407145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015315533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}