{"meta":{"query_hash":"b3a45f3fd6cb","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Consumer Research"},"cohort_total":150,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":150,"exported":150,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/b3a45f3fd6cb","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Consumer+Research"},"results":[{"id":"W1920365232","doi":"10.1086/669342","title":"Financial Insecurity and Deprivation Life Satisfaction, Self Determination, and Consumption Adequacy at the Bottom of the Pyramid How Economic Contractions and Expansions Affect Expenditure Patterns Living U.S. Capitalism: The Normalization of Credit/Debt Financial Deprivation Prompts Consumers to Seek Scarce Goods How Marketplace Performances Produce Interdependent Status Games and Contested Forms of Symbolic Capital","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Normalization (sociology); Poverty; Consumption (sociology); Recession; Affect (linguistics); Economics; Public economics; Demographic economics; Development economics; Finance; Economic growth; Sociology; Macroeconomics; Social science","score_opus":0.017825575225876564,"score_gpt":0.26527340366018837,"score_spread":0.2474478284343118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920365232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99295783,0.00030894438,0.000054807624,0.0012569362,0.000013424822,0.0000040398136,0.00014711058,0.0000023346715,0.0052546123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994319,0.00015745776,0.00002625878,0.000072631476,0.0000052122386,0.000002452727,0.000060539503,7.934321e-7,0.00024275087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997012,0.00009235985,0.000019933856,0.000031490425,0.000057713096,0.000097383105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989686,0.00012989824,0.00028898832,0.000052888303,0.00013809593,0.00042142617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062114355,0.00012367965,0.00023141685,0.0007130859,0.0010637657,0.0018536847,0.00019965487,0.00028959816,0.0027601388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019912764,0.00011534675,0.0003004937,0.0009281735,0.0012498838,0.0009107157,0.0013268542,0.000900047,0.0001653181],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007605318,0.0001540768,0.9586631,0.00003409255,0.000074283045,0.0001492404,0.011184638,0.00018103854,0.0002056395,0.0029117584,0.0024871102,0.023878943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016165235,0.00003761024,0.9869567,0.000027904412,0.000007745045,0.000044660494,0.010876305,0.00012036343,0.00002450208,0.0005428015,0.0013542075,0.0000055705505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022529073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034522545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022529073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079495955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004963524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04479587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969426638","doi":"10.1086/510222","title":"Taste Perception: More than Meets the Tongue","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":296,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Taste; Perception; Tongue; Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.20786995899293462,"score_gpt":0.5237197080753647,"score_spread":0.31584974908243013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969426638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8569274,0.01136466,0.019097798,0.0140881995,0.0007443331,0.000023636556,0.0002041988,0.00025325443,0.097296454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98448837,0.0023167941,0.0037583392,0.002309846,0.00014891422,0.0000059787353,0.000054867072,0.00009467685,0.0068222126],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995715,0.00006636999,0.00002126072,0.00009242328,0.00018547139,0.000063011335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993175,0.00023613934,0.000094396804,0.00012197844,0.00015119967,0.00007880787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005456247,0.00023918963,0.00064400624,0.00024099578,0.0005720022,0.0038362064,0.00032464624,0.0013569541,0.007274518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038104267,0.00026312692,0.00043113125,0.000343035,0.0017285651,0.004344716,0.0017657233,0.0010232345,0.0016228225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030416632,0.00018169072,0.03878669,0.0014028468,0.00018638487,0.0025649231,0.008368984,0.0008577008,0.47808754,0.07836621,0.007561474,0.38059384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040022202,0.0018565244,0.35075048,0.0012627176,0.00066748186,0.00963606,0.013028919,0.012965862,0.0671225,0.43499604,0.106886104,0.00042709569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014053662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010354379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007274518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040650394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050747255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024335682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969457880","doi":"10.1086/523289","title":"Technology/Ideology: How Ideological Fields Influence Consumers' Technology Narratives","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":266,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Articulation (sociology); Narrative; Semiotics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Semantic field; Systematic ideology; Epistemology; Linguistics; Political science; Politics; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.0522625407997183,"score_gpt":0.38593360186295445,"score_spread":0.33367106106323613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969457880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815669,0.00013458909,0.0012196013,0.00058483356,0.0000070684055,0.000010871684,0.00001818969,0.0000043244368,0.01645377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999537,0.000051598963,0.00018383295,0.000015849575,0.0000019050012,0.000005228754,0.00000549913,0.000003851274,0.00019535166],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957481,0.003084695,0.00010455989,0.00021335283,0.00057585933,0.00027342138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811273,0.015944794,0.0017118938,0.00031132108,0.0006586056,0.00024605784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059368494,0.00022834857,0.00023249745,0.0017219959,0.0019784388,0.0064044674,0.00035311544,0.0006305607,0.0019688273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014692301,0.00025515576,0.00017885547,0.0012067592,0.0059933066,0.004717881,0.0023527415,0.0008504296,0.00013937375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024312676,0.00006146739,0.06201501,0.00013058879,0.000031053252,0.00049164926,0.8733838,0.00039208113,0.0022999144,0.045437228,0.00040486522,0.015109207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044975295,0.00008691549,0.06776802,0.00027705927,0.00006411332,0.0002686539,0.8849109,0.003815117,0.0028770822,0.025731763,0.014098269,0.000057215482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003535495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031787616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064044674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020071159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00130686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031397402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971161285","doi":"10.1086/588747","title":"Politicizing Consumer Culture: Advertising's Appropriation of Political Ideology in China's Social Transition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Media, Gender, and Advertising","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":191,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Consumerism; Appropriation; Communism; Politics; China; Transition (genetics); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Semiotics; Political science; Political economy; Social science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1093603421777899,"score_gpt":0.42839303291368636,"score_spread":0.31903269073589646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971161285","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98328745,0.00008001367,0.0001469744,0.00048694052,0.00001010929,0.000004717897,0.000007711049,0.000002685968,0.01597337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926335,0.00003155324,0.000032866206,0.000031532694,0.00000505727,0.0000014273719,0.000003304666,0.0000010016206,0.0006298896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962664,0.00014314058,0.000014808666,0.00004593537,0.000068398665,0.00010105401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938905,0.00021035904,0.0001622541,0.00004263396,0.00010601492,0.000089646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092107203,0.00018133681,0.000120062265,0.0008574663,0.0021173228,0.0025912924,0.00023033228,0.00040138882,0.0022322054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001000107,0.00009974876,0.00014295298,0.00067103026,0.0036240865,0.0008053297,0.0010827798,0.0005663872,0.000094939795],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036587476,0.00021306491,0.40270555,0.0001824385,0.00006648266,0.0018737905,0.38807914,0.0005907344,0.01545855,0.10858031,0.002310526,0.07957348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034536413,0.00020506524,0.79949695,0.000086186585,0.000097346965,0.0004060977,0.15389568,0.0027294161,0.004659161,0.011756578,0.02656893,0.0000640758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016395755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026456889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016395755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025048235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015029581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03260064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971757912","doi":"10.1086/652248","title":"When Healthy Food Makes You Hungry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling","field":"Medicine","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Healthy eating; Perception; Psychology; Appetite; Healthy food; Eating behavior; Sample (material); Food choice; Social psychology; Healthy diet; Feeding behavior; Advertising; Obesity; Food science; Medicine; Physical activity; Business","score_opus":0.1140360199331268,"score_gpt":0.4260933169880146,"score_spread":0.31205729705488783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971757912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764484,0.0007118104,0.00076596887,0.004943953,0.00033043625,0.000022402839,0.00009285471,0.00002611037,0.016657988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962573,0.00033728668,0.00049131765,0.0014540252,0.00005622581,0.0000089356345,0.000053070762,0.000009103188,0.0013327581],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995735,0.00018132484,0.000024630526,0.000044766653,0.00011420048,0.00006161488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817944,0.00058737345,0.0006666816,0.00012329208,0.00021775973,0.00022539734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070076523,0.00015883707,0.00020913799,0.00028066308,0.000532861,0.0012196231,0.00013680109,0.0011542279,0.0071332795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049376455,0.00017637813,0.00020416304,0.00021130552,0.0010030799,0.00089404604,0.00071600307,0.0011927725,0.00055408286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012536751,0.0020792095,0.59390485,0.0012064999,0.0006416833,0.004610973,0.03281624,0.0005193755,0.096947044,0.012278722,0.03237419,0.21008451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024993345,0.0018484107,0.90947884,0.0004471968,0.0003973864,0.0027457161,0.03600259,0.0011427175,0.011129608,0.013242444,0.023121882,0.0001933175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091737683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015109875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071332795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039388315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014673613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023863196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972601993","doi":"10.1086/676967","title":"The Price of Being Beautiful: Negative Effects of Attractiveness on Empathy for Children in Need","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Empathy; Psychology; Social psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.042703216758393114,"score_gpt":0.3427174177186561,"score_spread":0.300014200960263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972601993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956115,0.000084249165,0.00008010634,0.00016730405,0.000008148271,0.0000092000555,0.000014374498,0.0000038474222,0.00402137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864954,0.00013584505,0.0002916955,0.00008377683,0.000005493226,0.000023280898,0.000012907512,0.000005092084,0.00079236896],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985089,0.0006109002,0.0000566961,0.00013534116,0.0005125643,0.00017570442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865393,0.008235842,0.00316586,0.0006084906,0.00044491742,0.0010055465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016756847,0.00033969164,0.0003374913,0.00036723245,0.00086002995,0.0010855685,0.00030568303,0.0006329462,0.00576394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010863333,0.0002394105,0.00038727873,0.00018630392,0.0016974274,0.00062373566,0.0012170294,0.0017857042,0.00028607433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010358352,0.0122443875,0.52569205,0.0018420187,0.0005138097,0.0063145813,0.07044184,0.0011444457,0.23294628,0.012822799,0.0052088643,0.12047066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019606964,0.0030939993,0.9581223,0.0001360882,0.00024843003,0.0012810464,0.01701802,0.00043963254,0.014370133,0.0019092594,0.0031159383,0.0000690932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014624199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025895787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00576394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007172949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047497422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019282341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978713057","doi":"10.1086/673469","title":"Place Attachment in Commercial Settings: A Gift Economy Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Marketing; Gift giving; Business; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07905234868074017,"score_gpt":0.4541789431114606,"score_spread":0.37512659443072044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978713057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.595893,0.004408359,0.014286903,0.019843709,0.00041006593,0.000088945075,0.000048094145,0.00003597457,0.36498484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961052,0.0006768331,0.0004621565,0.00023337397,0.000030087125,0.000009440035,0.000005765483,0.000004380881,0.0024727231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987507,0.0008452573,0.000026292963,0.00006511215,0.000106505395,0.00020600035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988412,0.0003890463,0.00016140129,0.00008459012,0.00010617752,0.00041744986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016343232,0.00035778477,0.0002492841,0.0014361802,0.005109779,0.0065622563,0.00062783004,0.0018808829,0.004218257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017089744,0.00023582442,0.00030088646,0.0008914597,0.01651461,0.006629575,0.004775968,0.0019489096,0.00025256473],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006631832,0.00018408302,0.014429234,0.00015725661,0.00002018155,0.003539737,0.14477643,0.00041109548,0.00072316173,0.8102679,0.002361663,0.023062918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035837707,0.00023724299,0.036439497,0.00051421166,0.000037822683,0.0050735236,0.6272236,0.002511913,0.00042190167,0.21421714,0.11322678,0.00006051822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041769547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005436621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065622563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003593633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012131666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026073813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978738802","doi":"10.1086/508524","title":"The Moderating Effect of Relationship Norm Salience on Consumers' Loss Aversion: Figure 1","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Loss aversion; Endowment effect; Moderation; Social psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Status quo bias; Psychology; Economics; Norm (philosophy); Salient; Status quo; Microeconomics; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.07471195074891311,"score_gpt":0.4557823533246602,"score_spread":0.3810704025757471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978738802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.984496,0.0003634132,0.0023070918,0.00083190674,0.000070651426,0.00016303327,0.00045932856,0.000054629934,0.011253873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633515,0.000113165144,0.0012397082,0.00012885199,0.000024379335,0.00009664539,0.00017634197,0.000016097782,0.001869717],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99790597,0.0011946916,0.00008947968,0.00039390835,0.00027055282,0.00014542474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96616924,0.02670009,0.0029770532,0.0015640181,0.001229738,0.0013598627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032764347,0.0008025771,0.0006008613,0.000496411,0.0006593051,0.0015944404,0.00071753113,0.0013860415,0.028349135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021621456,0.00050312764,0.00084914046,0.00040331695,0.00095609215,0.0015170353,0.00149955,0.0015499133,0.0007027186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014538277,0.0033459854,0.8799783,0.000890354,0.0018812249,0.0003543418,0.0064749033,0.002363748,0.022876522,0.01672037,0.0031979817,0.04737786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006195688,0.0024384574,0.9731513,0.00016959081,0.0017690114,0.00022396194,0.001646937,0.005087232,0.0046508806,0.0056581586,0.0045178933,0.00006705928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003755885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027032876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028349135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005363743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069300615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09483731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982758613","doi":"10.1086/671475","title":"The Effect of Product Size and Form Distortion on Consumer Recycling Behavior","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Dispose pattern; Consumption (sociology); Garbage; Product (mathematics); Consumer behaviour; Process (computing); Point (geometry); Field (mathematics); Distortion (music); Decision process; Marketing; Business; Environmental economics; Economics; Engineering; Computer science; Waste management; Mathematics; Process management; Sociology","score_opus":0.021011198680037844,"score_gpt":0.35253933767938167,"score_spread":0.3315281389993438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982758613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976883,0.000088152614,0.00037879078,0.000043071075,0.0000022477996,0.000017440914,0.000012985014,0.000005051013,0.0017640726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991025,0.000052421725,0.0005486331,0.000019575235,0.0000026418754,0.000008034334,0.000019807267,0.0000040188743,0.00024240764],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969585,0.001472363,0.0001823746,0.00026966847,0.000983771,0.00013327524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9739101,0.015901372,0.006751902,0.0019856575,0.000999547,0.000451579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028428002,0.00033529673,0.0002891625,0.00045629896,0.00040382287,0.0011442193,0.00038536475,0.00049539167,0.0026332715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017228175,0.00030461766,0.0006664866,0.00025178504,0.0016911518,0.0009010079,0.0008726835,0.00056813844,0.00017481265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008402447,0.0014824696,0.8614727,0.0004116872,0.00043770217,0.00063569273,0.0049207,0.0026636703,0.06003195,0.0016265571,0.00017972275,0.05773471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077475124,0.002668627,0.9782929,0.00003520782,0.00017794425,0.00057435356,0.0023472935,0.0017655924,0.012218769,0.00092469406,0.0008514852,0.000065742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027590916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038162644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028428002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009441678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004953964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015034318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986326647","doi":"10.1086/656667","title":"Social Exclusion Causes People to Spend and Consume Strategically in the Service of Affiliation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":524,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Belongingness; Social exclusion; Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Service (business); Social group; Marketing; Business; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.1442803816431186,"score_gpt":0.4738785163024669,"score_spread":0.3295981346593483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986326647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999006,0.000025204512,0.00010354882,0.000047383783,0.0000036175845,0.0000058887317,0.0000051869247,0.0000032587043,0.00080004724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99953103,0.000024446063,0.00010963355,0.000039120096,0.0000031808067,0.000008507484,0.000011471141,0.0000011753193,0.00027139272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948394,0.00020718279,0.000030293206,0.000058080946,0.00011701575,0.000103552135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985378,0.00034901543,0.0005128551,0.00020574697,0.000056772897,0.00033787824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006247376,0.00033619188,0.0003453286,0.00047878653,0.0010977121,0.0006637748,0.00016088648,0.00046247328,0.0029295175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014558211,0.00017703627,0.0003529135,0.00014543663,0.0015916586,0.00033297006,0.0015075943,0.0008188955,0.0001530493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072820247,0.008485333,0.76890934,0.00034188817,0.00038318406,0.0023429974,0.012096039,0.000298087,0.14420506,0.0040057194,0.0009137716,0.050736547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029845847,0.008340168,0.9549767,0.000060999817,0.00023985656,0.0022676052,0.011595632,0.0007984197,0.014440358,0.004100016,0.0028070635,0.00007465405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070516096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016512618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029295175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020980707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029854904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009800196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987612265","doi":"10.1086/660853","title":"The Dynamics of Goal Revision: A Cybernetic Multiperiod Test-Operate-Test-Adjust-Loop (TOTAL) Model of Self-Regulation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Satisficing; Cybernetics; Maximization; Function (biology); Computer science; Test (biology); Monotonic function; Dynamics (music); System dynamics; Sensitivity (control systems); Management science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Economics; Ecology; Engineering","score_opus":0.15144868149703986,"score_gpt":0.43758244668565194,"score_spread":0.2861337651886121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987612265","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4003896,0.0002872772,0.5517201,0.00222147,0.000049641705,0.0001564842,0.00019264047,0.00032252594,0.044660266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856135,0.00006026778,0.012625474,0.00006305982,0.00000776288,0.00007124363,0.000022605915,0.000015013301,0.0015211112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992459,0.00033721008,0.00003010641,0.00014635078,0.00016096407,0.000079502875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980102,0.00096945727,0.00032621474,0.00027025153,0.00025346724,0.00017047784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001822547,0.00037630412,0.0004415902,0.00059961044,0.00038870348,0.0017584187,0.0011148608,0.00078647607,0.0037877492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005040617,0.0002865269,0.00078037754,0.00036327427,0.0015745515,0.0020089603,0.0011608951,0.0009704808,0.000368266],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036469524,0.00036944734,0.018544199,0.00016330866,0.0002065956,0.00040340913,0.0029547291,0.3004527,0.0074841566,0.61205554,0.0015996414,0.05540149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058886246,0.00024206228,0.0075663663,0.000029200944,0.000047275247,0.00017640107,0.00042447372,0.7956361,0.00076492765,0.1933983,0.0016152029,0.000040836872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026539227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011950709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037877492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001284064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096472545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012671292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990673961","doi":"10.1086/678485","title":"Optimal Visualization Aids and Temporal Framing for New Products","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Visualization; Construal level theory; Computer science; Perspective (graphical); Framing (construction); Product (mathematics); Information visualization; New product development; Creative visualization; Data science; Cognitive psychology; Human–computer interaction; Psychology; Data mining; Artificial intelligence; Marketing; Social psychology; Engineering; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2275584266323012,"score_gpt":0.5408625343237436,"score_spread":0.31330410769144246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990673961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95076716,0.003139441,0.018559007,0.0007534607,0.00020202622,0.00021235258,0.00008188912,0.00024188295,0.026042918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667559,0.0010591525,0.030634355,0.00009990546,0.000059591002,0.000102775455,0.000057385543,0.000043338532,0.0011876231],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988135,0.0006610365,0.00008446404,0.000109009154,0.00026057826,0.000071522954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878491,0.008676668,0.0018672612,0.0006733866,0.0005054157,0.00042826598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020152894,0.0005357984,0.00024625586,0.00069622335,0.00037003314,0.0024121315,0.00041090688,0.000616504,0.0076937787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023102552,0.00031756843,0.00031544353,0.00034118976,0.0005134847,0.0031968849,0.0010866817,0.0006655691,0.0004078331],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017122272,0.004287142,0.04419545,0.0053110714,0.00033027597,0.0016923705,0.021046776,0.008175582,0.20465596,0.0767776,0.0048033954,0.6116021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041641733,0.027719434,0.37060884,0.008909497,0.0037294598,0.0057600285,0.039784018,0.07288729,0.14094053,0.19258763,0.13185336,0.001055667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044327296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006676523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076937787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004002912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043364946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02573824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995142053","doi":"10.1086/657924","title":"A Coal in the Heart: Self-Relevance as a Post-Exit Predictor of Consumer Anti-Brand Actions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":307,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Relevance (law); Psychology; Advertising; Word of mouth; Product (mathematics); Consumer behaviour; Hostility; Social psychology; Brand relationship; Marketing; Brand management; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.07395615819292695,"score_gpt":0.3702358122170526,"score_spread":0.29627965402412565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995142053","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992156,0.000033985085,0.000062090876,0.00009458451,0.0000037277482,0.00000374039,0.000008195342,0.0000012653607,0.0005768603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996859,0.000016447055,0.000048038597,0.000022172999,0.0000054574866,0.000001164271,0.00001667055,0.0000011229471,0.00020307377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996544,0.00013323329,0.00002590077,0.000037931448,0.00007539902,0.00007317763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891076,0.0037770001,0.0032642537,0.000552775,0.0006854023,0.0026128853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010536707,0.00013466622,0.00017507772,0.00059557165,0.00055452273,0.0012006635,0.00022547395,0.00068157696,0.0034649053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008788097,0.00011977376,0.00019847769,0.00027304114,0.00076146,0.00086867594,0.0006699165,0.0012120549,0.00024450262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020660106,0.00039580298,0.99396473,0.000007997335,0.000026477714,0.000119405486,0.0008166011,0.000052218347,0.00033386244,0.0002748906,0.00013546011,0.0036659248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005052074,0.000119021235,0.99734616,0.000007985272,0.000014274779,0.0001402017,0.0012665377,0.0005182709,0.00014009452,0.00024916217,0.00018816197,0.0000049612663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016425858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022087323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034649053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002058945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032918624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011591256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998687323","doi":"10.1086/664040","title":"An Arousal Regulation Explanation of Mood Effects on Consumer Choice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Arousal; Mood; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09762741184233416,"score_gpt":0.38480536831607115,"score_spread":0.287177956473737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998687323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94395405,0.00048380377,0.008300874,0.001058854,0.00006105747,0.000066522574,0.00009205531,0.000037229478,0.04594558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983565,0.00010065148,0.0006568635,0.00011475328,0.000027228625,0.00001621119,0.000018472985,0.0000049630207,0.00070436805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968517,0.00014947714,0.000010389108,0.0000435988,0.000063305946,0.00004811715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982829,0.0011672494,0.0001762651,0.00011940737,0.0001488108,0.0001054281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096971635,0.0002946693,0.00027662644,0.000520063,0.00029184687,0.0013954213,0.00025862386,0.0005659536,0.0063030357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029945055,0.00017739482,0.000731103,0.0002320961,0.00067403115,0.00047931526,0.0006615997,0.0005564966,0.00039550278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0071615637,0.00303874,0.41490713,0.0008850536,0.0006749437,0.0027947184,0.007818988,0.019701375,0.15863924,0.21189716,0.0039966633,0.16848439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046573026,0.0012939629,0.8399011,0.00011754142,0.0002880434,0.00066813,0.00095894636,0.06176903,0.007654568,0.08376532,0.0030160318,0.00010161077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006445195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041670995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063030357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035716296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001176989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021085799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2005621770","doi":"10.1086/660918","title":"Social Information in the Retail Environment: The Importance of Consumption Alignment, Referent Identity, and Self-Esteem","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Referent; Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Social identity theory; Identity (music); Marketing; Psychology; Social comparison theory; Advertising; Social psychology; Business; Sociology; Social group","score_opus":0.15923447870216673,"score_gpt":0.36878335809403084,"score_spread":0.20954887939186412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005621770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858764,0.00008509457,0.00033731805,0.0002664263,0.000005076586,0.000006669477,0.000008315026,0.0000027190376,0.013412034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956423,0.000033958157,0.00012050273,0.000024406456,0.000004777306,0.00000212795,0.000006472182,0.0000016262416,0.0002418658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985531,0.0006360753,0.00006488122,0.00010515846,0.00051627605,0.0001244713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99267066,0.0029294395,0.002515241,0.00041574764,0.00064506667,0.00082387927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020726821,0.00018223052,0.00021526896,0.0009509877,0.00095286063,0.0031305978,0.00024458958,0.0004987298,0.0036969641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00885928,0.00013600365,0.00015826226,0.000520271,0.0023554864,0.0020931512,0.0013685992,0.0007735445,0.00020982347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055768894,0.0014791314,0.86776555,0.00013834647,0.00010137206,0.00068840635,0.041373294,0.00041860287,0.006716535,0.014209436,0.00042077544,0.066130795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012346771,0.00034184128,0.9636466,0.000055104683,0.00003349805,0.00037370078,0.026756318,0.0007701415,0.0011402216,0.00503168,0.0018067183,0.000031752024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009854692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016037952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036969641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005201619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044928674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012367606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2009241456","doi":"10.1086/599045","title":"The Influence of Categorical Attributes on Choice Context Effects","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Categorical variable; Context (archaeology); Library science; Psychology; Sociology; Advertising; Computer science; History; Business","score_opus":0.26603361681559656,"score_gpt":0.5172143874819393,"score_spread":0.2511807706663427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009241456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97364783,0.0005708709,0.009163197,0.00015176785,0.00005081386,0.000058674268,0.000087541965,0.000056566314,0.016212735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547124,0.00012041318,0.0038683878,0.000058237838,0.000026464337,0.000025014315,0.000030178406,0.000025229145,0.000374839],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954336,0.0022029607,0.00026159408,0.00052147085,0.0013690683,0.00021136465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9394267,0.050488357,0.003209528,0.0035397692,0.0017327766,0.0016029049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032038442,0.00045942655,0.0005472338,0.0005843257,0.00059594755,0.0018049704,0.00045842625,0.0004999924,0.005715714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03468435,0.0003227702,0.00036919455,0.0003599958,0.00095828174,0.001291708,0.0015118417,0.0012955557,0.00034186902],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010463515,0.001866301,0.085891925,0.0015925381,0.00039040303,0.0009086855,0.0032306104,0.008886726,0.6648055,0.05054105,0.00076993875,0.17065284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009019453,0.0049802554,0.6347601,0.00036222467,0.0013826847,0.0023499911,0.0019618785,0.056506697,0.17349066,0.10964026,0.013097336,0.00056600524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005724904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076755823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005715714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036902615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003764381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019120991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020655902","doi":"10.1086/658469","title":"When Your World Must Be Defended: Choosing Products to Justify the System","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.624328322791767,"score_gpt":0.41916412887637966,"score_spread":0.20516419391538732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020655902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95903945,0.00022202502,0.0042729196,0.0018246246,0.000038310365,0.000020495407,0.000009678704,0.00001317914,0.03455935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645305,0.000056187964,0.0021203842,0.0002448964,0.000006396872,0.0000046446894,0.000008808038,0.000010919284,0.0010945819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975925,0.0014416376,0.000061063176,0.00016085689,0.0005269378,0.00021698489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472153,0.0024841984,0.0011089646,0.0006201293,0.0005728114,0.00049227016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003845628,0.00023262626,0.00019081007,0.0003729135,0.0012735291,0.0048957067,0.00026651827,0.0014465641,0.0031682611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013147831,0.00022473626,0.00018602841,0.00016866755,0.0038534321,0.002876508,0.0012506578,0.0021543158,0.0004089988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002096204,0.0012301155,0.2732852,0.00044957348,0.000510371,0.0028380551,0.16088651,0.0017969642,0.06716126,0.3099396,0.008319098,0.1714871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023245231,0.0015261606,0.42628947,0.0006890228,0.00035741585,0.0036847338,0.1528352,0.010810768,0.019547744,0.28126034,0.10240361,0.00036309208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082233653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015944875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048957067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061559596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005412868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02033788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025443246","doi":"10.1086/513041","title":"On the Perceived Value of Money: The Reference Dependence of Currency Numerosity Effects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Numerosity adaptation effect; Anchoring; Value (mathematics); Economics; Currency; Salient; Perception; Illusion; Value for money; Microeconomics; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Public economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.32434961425618797,"score_gpt":0.5109207354967847,"score_spread":0.18657112124059677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025443246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373022,0.0007446675,0.018778723,0.000886258,0.00005648696,0.00010030611,0.00016506515,0.00007009083,0.041896198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950304,0.0001979069,0.003780325,0.0002106033,0.000034600424,0.000055518416,0.000095680894,0.000065026434,0.0005298536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759597,0.0010674176,0.0001315778,0.00054254866,0.000529005,0.0001335198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9017221,0.08167877,0.0049122134,0.0074422406,0.0026632997,0.001581359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006181136,0.00048991945,0.0007506938,0.0010589563,0.0004873008,0.002294889,0.0007984533,0.0013595913,0.012989581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07628181,0.00043368357,0.00055764324,0.00050840335,0.002567377,0.0045236517,0.0031232017,0.0023037724,0.00069953484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02349499,0.003137467,0.11024439,0.0014367562,0.0005132304,0.0011769407,0.013327166,0.0113242,0.28158915,0.28727418,0.003027013,0.26345462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001086705,0.0021009978,0.60471535,0.00046598536,0.0006400093,0.00097134826,0.0020216152,0.031126805,0.029150952,0.3233124,0.0040839342,0.0003238325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008722541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046060194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012989581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006725845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030320542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04345447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030661745","doi":"10.1086/677225","title":"Retracted: Proud to Belong or Proudly Different? Lay Theories Determine Contrasting Effects of Incidental Pride on Uniqueness Seeking","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Notice; Uniqueness; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1278620779771821,"score_gpt":0.38384732639473124,"score_spread":0.2559852484175491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030661745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801593,0.00010762437,0.00039170036,0.0004946752,0.000060330876,0.000011730895,0.00002909689,0.0000070941974,0.018738568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719584,0.00006719185,0.00031770824,0.00017135525,0.000021687925,0.000009736325,0.000038541166,0.000027876493,0.002150072],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835557,0.00062228326,0.0000894559,0.00025843905,0.00046231906,0.00021185694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670273,0.020153185,0.00562738,0.0033099838,0.0013182528,0.0025639338],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003804098,0.00026512615,0.0003809838,0.0005852261,0.00083991396,0.003618146,0.00065063144,0.0012311443,0.018443244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04862537,0.0003614479,0.0002878491,0.0002775333,0.002383789,0.002703267,0.0030175291,0.0028389264,0.0011986558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015520197,0.005376596,0.6174966,0.00079198455,0.000548179,0.002381926,0.06342832,0.000661094,0.09701395,0.04900788,0.00582768,0.14194565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013628189,0.00090202206,0.9404425,0.00020913432,0.0001688509,0.0009746136,0.020279653,0.0016082315,0.0065945913,0.025354747,0.0032509621,0.00007831849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006847568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011080275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99876887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004540711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039670226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061698854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033706136","doi":"10.1086/338211","title":"Combinatory and Separative Effects of Rhetorical Figures on Consumers’ Effort and Focus in Ad Processing","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Rhetorical question; Focus (optics); Library science; History; Computer science; Art history; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.088271236203472,"score_gpt":0.35261114029419316,"score_spread":0.26433990409072117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033706136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909931,0.00009868761,0.0013959988,0.00009049118,0.0000083353525,0.000035239937,0.000031970532,0.000041706502,0.007304288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99659675,0.000068349436,0.0023952352,0.000048974478,0.000019766354,0.000036834113,0.000047335467,0.000058563204,0.0007281136],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638724,0.0016949769,0.00032159686,0.0005320956,0.0008667066,0.00019737553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9003236,0.08250746,0.0076821414,0.005615986,0.0020384165,0.0018323131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068534105,0.00060641376,0.0004786932,0.0011117943,0.00050025,0.0036324833,0.00049087516,0.00090836856,0.005612186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05274956,0.00062339066,0.00044115743,0.00054484257,0.0016083706,0.0030008315,0.0016719397,0.0011221482,0.0005388814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017390277,0.004116607,0.29829493,0.0014065957,0.000584103,0.0015229515,0.03734147,0.00685696,0.3292289,0.01693343,0.0012166259,0.28510714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006388975,0.0035174754,0.9298623,0.000163437,0.0006082442,0.0007364466,0.0052935663,0.009915309,0.034467977,0.01136151,0.0032838343,0.00015102712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047956847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005242077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068534105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054823305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030672373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03624475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043070498","doi":"10.1086/323733","title":"The Effect of Novel Attributes on Product Evaluation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":493,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Key (lock); Marketing; Computer science; Business; Product category; Mathematics","score_opus":0.48454092964424295,"score_gpt":0.5497554782117692,"score_spread":0.06521454856752623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043070498","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98372966,0.00089833495,0.0025851515,0.00029670043,0.000042765565,0.00008839059,0.00010151306,0.000035000972,0.012222489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982734,0.00012921866,0.00092321966,0.000037147747,0.000023790115,0.00001605721,0.000043585544,0.0000071930112,0.00054643635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367356,0.0032114356,0.00039839797,0.000445677,0.002009567,0.00026135924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80440885,0.16580637,0.013335066,0.005907045,0.007690512,0.0028521065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066974335,0.00050175266,0.0006932007,0.000985304,0.0004337849,0.00231348,0.00041498788,0.0011815801,0.005136803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0758721,0.00021451394,0.0007123955,0.00060796813,0.00088226417,0.0020468263,0.0011330427,0.0012904586,0.00031632048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022845209,0.008631858,0.4678613,0.0023776172,0.0014045839,0.0018009364,0.002705326,0.042175762,0.04605895,0.01417303,0.002664156,0.3873013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057371747,0.008813607,0.88612646,0.000220068,0.0010078585,0.0008861791,0.0010305782,0.055118155,0.017785914,0.022852708,0.0053095655,0.00027517762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008701593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080213253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066974335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012965741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042697258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03541982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043636764","doi":"10.1086/660187","title":"When Imitation Doesn’t Flatter: The Role of Consumer Distinctiveness in Responses to Mimicry","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Possession (linguistics); Mimicry; Imitation; Psychology; Dissociation (chemistry); Social psychology; Advertising; Business; Chemistry; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.2933899427831964,"score_gpt":0.38932161192439163,"score_spread":0.09593166914119522,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043636764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957463,0.000038429796,0.0010308247,0.00011624256,0.000020194226,0.000025567606,0.000009406371,0.000017825354,0.0029952687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985942,0.000017000975,0.0009459567,0.00007602078,0.000004113828,0.000019063136,0.000008588832,0.000008268909,0.00032669213],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988487,0.0005676675,0.00006897029,0.0001565468,0.0002637135,0.00009437078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926301,0.004436332,0.0013858938,0.00093458884,0.00023974922,0.00037335738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012766947,0.00028213707,0.00036217776,0.00017837893,0.00022886512,0.00072503334,0.00038109403,0.001037266,0.0032589408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017874418,0.0002963733,0.00019689139,0.00008276609,0.0009784331,0.0005580093,0.0009384589,0.0010755443,0.00018676155],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005863324,0.0008584203,0.027026325,0.00038302978,0.00012969678,0.0009157901,0.0024100146,0.002003109,0.930648,0.0028283154,0.0004142043,0.026519828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073748134,0.014558615,0.5663471,0.00019157628,0.00038095587,0.002860431,0.0044843545,0.047081064,0.3408744,0.017920747,0.0043406254,0.00022271558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032123682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003466934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032589408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003488117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021129847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010902226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045006760","doi":"10.1086/591105","title":"Recalling Past Temptations: An Information-Processing Perspective on the Dynamics of Self-Control","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Control (management); Dynamics (music); Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.08233675005374667,"score_gpt":0.34786406916918056,"score_spread":0.26552731911543387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045006760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74643326,0.005049102,0.16615096,0.014529151,0.00015190234,0.000118156546,0.00047598887,0.00014543098,0.06694606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98922825,0.0009104856,0.008585392,0.00024229192,0.000109595974,0.000031348456,0.00007250797,0.000017626311,0.0008024711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991891,0.00030343494,0.000034355442,0.00020585977,0.00017788226,0.0000894583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924986,0.005046888,0.0010153718,0.0007024383,0.00039963788,0.00033705236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017934522,0.0004517049,0.00046151786,0.0015116193,0.00056402176,0.004882926,0.0009035867,0.0011695721,0.0024801192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101982765,0.00031873348,0.0005349577,0.0010526868,0.0031754328,0.006392681,0.0009821426,0.0016149714,0.00017951307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00095715775,0.00069370365,0.1016527,0.00048194226,0.00041897013,0.0014314061,0.03134008,0.030713728,0.023551816,0.6160196,0.0019712022,0.19076777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009572115,0.00058447197,0.13431183,0.0002733544,0.00023045305,0.0008911652,0.0065630157,0.09828034,0.0036649692,0.7468685,0.007959382,0.00027681253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002193095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010936398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004882926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096891983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006377049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0094848275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057430872","doi":"10.1086/591102","title":"Stigma by Association in Coupon Redemption: Looking Cheap because of Others","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Coupon; Stigma (botany); Association (psychology); Advertising; Value (mathematics); Business; Social psychology; Psychology; Marketing; Mathematics; Statistics; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.09180245673321154,"score_gpt":0.3511958051405831,"score_spread":0.25939334840737155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057430872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759389,0.00017119014,0.0007719358,0.00042587367,0.00001939266,0.000016470944,0.0000054773686,0.000003393145,0.022647228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902904,0.00006533191,0.00020247852,0.000089595844,0.0000060871444,0.0000067108695,0.000003124513,0.0000012037723,0.0005964916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970305,0.001835569,0.0000750906,0.00012479792,0.0006810737,0.00025293606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901912,0.005352256,0.002094616,0.0013730448,0.00040305257,0.00058572483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030711186,0.00019570474,0.00023838504,0.00039668957,0.0020552021,0.0017657804,0.00028596717,0.001093895,0.003532781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097372355,0.00023509546,0.00043453666,0.00023723867,0.0036839987,0.0012237454,0.0028372759,0.0018911364,0.00019877616],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020239935,0.003008382,0.45526445,0.0007283657,0.0002904823,0.004405543,0.24685298,0.0008052176,0.031079922,0.10197129,0.0033283022,0.15024108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012276866,0.0015790622,0.80269945,0.00060561165,0.00030648732,0.009448071,0.11000819,0.0030957856,0.013269946,0.031452876,0.027228251,0.00018360761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012819384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020841607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003532781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008418093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062960974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016241789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058287148","doi":"10.1086/666616","title":"When Differences Unite: Resource Dependence in Heterogeneous Consumption Communities","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":294,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Consumption (sociology); Resource (disambiguation); Dependency (UML); Marketing; Frame (networking); Business; Bridge (graph theory); Public relations; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.2118118426478733,"score_gpt":0.42720688032069876,"score_spread":0.21539503767282545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058287148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9033314,0.0003585315,0.015226855,0.0026190195,0.00003556208,0.00006998567,0.000049659226,0.000031340955,0.078277804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983199,0.000038228925,0.0008335802,0.000099455756,0.000005429745,0.000012803314,0.000011205549,0.000008770166,0.0006705406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618965,0.0019901695,0.00013670213,0.0006854723,0.0005101635,0.00048792505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247134,0.004015453,0.001160183,0.0009745572,0.00060494896,0.0007735696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040361355,0.0001741467,0.00034769418,0.0013462316,0.0037021488,0.005182896,0.0009284561,0.0010643177,0.0047515975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01609745,0.00029296224,0.00025364826,0.001275579,0.009453103,0.008247904,0.0076339045,0.0010680977,0.00024777444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004042768,0.00023893267,0.107232906,0.000271661,0.000098505276,0.0014881068,0.3335284,0.0009908397,0.0038755946,0.44218114,0.0028515954,0.10683803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080469414,0.0001908603,0.13587266,0.0002982639,0.00013215578,0.0011053603,0.35758647,0.004875134,0.0018155737,0.43435055,0.06356643,0.00012610779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052626687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068400647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052626687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002346298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013183038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021345317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067158524","doi":"10.1086/674547","title":"Environmental Disorder Leads to Self-Regulatory Failure","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Risk analysis (engineering); Business","score_opus":0.07371979811409693,"score_gpt":0.442799657994034,"score_spread":0.3690798598799371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067158524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99741274,0.00013006714,0.00014016828,0.00009426918,0.0000056793874,0.000003966882,0.000009949856,0.0000076884035,0.0021954256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995753,0.0000990937,0.00006441978,0.000023089873,0.0000024826672,0.0000016622345,0.000013370276,0.0000018206192,0.00021867319],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983025,0.00006179308,0.000011581248,0.000025278265,0.000030273255,0.000040770658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990528,0.0002617474,0.00036517452,0.00009294627,0.000055364362,0.00017193225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030824312,0.00015106729,0.00012972976,0.0004527194,0.0004072096,0.0004052592,0.000100682984,0.00024444715,0.0030505224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015538054,0.00009403419,0.00021449411,0.00022909415,0.0006064779,0.00021181749,0.00056444574,0.0003694725,0.00015585317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068970164,0.0013658964,0.9285838,0.00012941356,0.00013273922,0.004813668,0.0022379975,0.0005241129,0.010108699,0.003026176,0.00095199555,0.0474358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029898567,0.00038911166,0.98606175,0.00005062303,0.00006836362,0.0041105007,0.0024932958,0.0006757995,0.0018810828,0.002397859,0.0018265329,0.000015008874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013708514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021486518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030505224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025900782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022359323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01020503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083029387","doi":"10.1086/677893","title":"Consuming Experiential Categories","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Psychology; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.0972317457304117,"score_gpt":0.36124385110908563,"score_spread":0.2640121053786739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083029387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5642802,0.0012581135,0.062126517,0.004683747,0.0002917398,0.00017473922,0.0003016636,0.00015104865,0.3667323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9705016,0.00049408583,0.0144530535,0.00052425946,0.000066015775,0.000081672675,0.00024498848,0.000060907307,0.013573303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981109,0.0008205659,0.00007642496,0.00023507973,0.0005205459,0.00023654666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753463,0.0006036232,0.0003206496,0.00064256,0.00041572616,0.00048285184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020463627,0.0004400346,0.00020354221,0.0008769459,0.0015637768,0.004616414,0.0007506941,0.0008201325,0.009370096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056699486,0.00020389457,0.00041047332,0.0007900572,0.004239803,0.0051451097,0.003301206,0.0010926494,0.00087829353],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003465884,0.00030285816,0.030237298,0.00054761744,0.00015942976,0.00065864605,0.08685701,0.000983712,0.009942951,0.62961155,0.013308215,0.2270442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037709633,0.0003600487,0.052574318,0.00049796305,0.000089073954,0.0011243082,0.10372145,0.0017584646,0.0043777637,0.41968524,0.41561958,0.00015415292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009468334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013301743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009370096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009758682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006522242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031346083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083103907","doi":"10.1086/378620","title":"The Moderating Effect of Product Knowledge on the Learning and Organization of Product Information","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Knowledge management; Business; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03679162106785926,"score_gpt":0.3582096045292086,"score_spread":0.3214179834613493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083103907","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99583864,0.00028408863,0.0006200432,0.000099429344,0.000007873993,0.000028915287,0.000050064402,0.0000107467395,0.0030601537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968681,0.0002657774,0.0012728679,0.00006523145,0.0000121629855,0.000031325268,0.00008918107,0.000014234597,0.0013811311],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981834,0.0006082904,0.00016296176,0.00046544443,0.0004051577,0.00017459218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8894158,0.09561483,0.007321257,0.003875315,0.0020868902,0.0016859144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003106912,0.0005459207,0.00069290114,0.00069786515,0.00054560887,0.0026900966,0.0008551784,0.0012704815,0.009248917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051520802,0.0005309248,0.00049702823,0.00054977334,0.0011135001,0.002872154,0.0012914662,0.0014583333,0.00054727687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019270083,0.009314017,0.6631515,0.0017338002,0.0011520217,0.001433654,0.01289812,0.003315085,0.08616574,0.0037440893,0.0005659399,0.19725594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035731183,0.0035965126,0.95871764,0.00017175493,0.0010920225,0.00095956033,0.0022589888,0.0039729676,0.021166628,0.0060804123,0.0015170423,0.00010904505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030083447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003466112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009248917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084056205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089373725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030940711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085296922","doi":"10.1086/383423","title":"When Goals Are Counterproductive: The Effects of Violation of a Behavioral Goal on Subsequent Performance","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Goal pursuit; Process (computing); Goal setting; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Goal orientation; Computer science","score_opus":0.11064820868420203,"score_gpt":0.47560875087661864,"score_spread":0.3649605421924166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085296922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99567395,0.00017450239,0.0007880534,0.00018815682,0.000019132238,0.000032625707,0.000033835797,0.000017098746,0.0030727712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99764097,0.00013146196,0.0014965062,0.000115431845,0.00000926276,0.000053178028,0.0000452705,0.000016806218,0.0004911635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972899,0.0012640108,0.00016196705,0.00027573734,0.00076504424,0.00024346502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98211575,0.010305133,0.0038892033,0.0015064735,0.0006657382,0.001517794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036730426,0.0005254621,0.0004163266,0.00051315076,0.00045451775,0.0014089717,0.000457222,0.0010705894,0.002470676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020411817,0.0003166995,0.0003777976,0.000321714,0.0010481018,0.000830055,0.0014470582,0.0014682834,0.00030757912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012632542,0.022605766,0.6023906,0.0012111487,0.0015372593,0.0011151843,0.0086626345,0.004114329,0.15088649,0.008293434,0.001866667,0.18468404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016162296,0.007458301,0.9709942,0.00009410532,0.0002359629,0.00028587997,0.0009865812,0.0020603056,0.0120426845,0.004455086,0.0011531335,0.000072197305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012023791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018466505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036730426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041997244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060504867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019425154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097949912","doi":"10.1086/656570","title":"The Locus of Choice: Personal Causality and Satisfaction with Hedonic and Utilitarian Decisions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":378,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Pleasure; Outcome (game theory); Psychology; Causality (physics); Valence (chemistry); Social psychology; Consumption (sociology); Attribution; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.23888570809045664,"score_gpt":0.49747238384875897,"score_spread":0.2585866757583023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097949912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99621034,0.00005522248,0.000997495,0.0000746806,0.0000040212753,0.000009952268,0.00002284186,0.0000045664206,0.0026208835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946016,0.000019171739,0.0002668879,0.000016149044,0.0000030778165,0.0000046190235,0.00002470112,0.000002764399,0.00020252552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979685,0.0011538845,0.00012794299,0.00015010223,0.00047204408,0.00012751092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820691,0.009502824,0.0046317265,0.0015274314,0.00075404515,0.0015149148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037358534,0.0002421368,0.00028641845,0.0006043144,0.0003671439,0.0021037643,0.00025931964,0.00066004443,0.004397062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018367076,0.00020787159,0.00048797874,0.000623991,0.0014516908,0.000918667,0.0010169074,0.0010041522,0.00022613835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017730803,0.0020915973,0.9459568,0.00010522519,0.00036046124,0.00020143394,0.0033534598,0.0025481891,0.006193163,0.0057794848,0.00023253437,0.031404592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010500789,0.000872082,0.9814865,0.000023370263,0.0001038154,0.00024612728,0.0018666084,0.00493846,0.001572755,0.00814666,0.0005966773,0.000041862888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004962613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006191717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004397062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004042165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002658024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01975733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098343396","doi":"10.1086/674137","title":"The Nature of Slacktivism: How the Social Observability of an Initial Act of Token Support Affects Subsequent Prosocial Action","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":450,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Observability; Security token; Action (physics); White (mutation); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.2148304279486311,"score_gpt":0.5155401545271938,"score_spread":0.3007097265785627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098343396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874867,0.0000520765,0.0016955141,0.00020518273,0.0000104939645,0.000020201696,0.000014934915,0.000013922571,0.010501019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998872,0.000021419459,0.00063646445,0.00004199385,0.0000041795147,0.000015512334,0.000012240551,0.000008756624,0.0003874842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984132,0.00078902714,0.0000527461,0.0002695196,0.00031322805,0.00016220222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98859465,0.0063663526,0.002893235,0.0009824014,0.00034991023,0.00081348495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001990329,0.00021203491,0.00019960082,0.00035166784,0.0007563038,0.0014976271,0.0002785959,0.0005744345,0.0038077375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014116513,0.00023619595,0.00023482463,0.00016934825,0.001997958,0.0009843052,0.0013166989,0.0010899844,0.00020565689],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035828368,0.00363735,0.647112,0.00065886986,0.00046852,0.0011571717,0.051807474,0.001966298,0.13899998,0.03917879,0.0010862015,0.11034449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050711158,0.0012515126,0.97077507,0.00006866292,0.00010803801,0.0002410232,0.0057659685,0.0018075329,0.0051414804,0.0124917375,0.0022553215,0.000042837473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010044661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017028401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038077375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067221635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056088105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012738109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098670744","doi":"10.1086/673441","title":"How Price Promotions Influence Postpurchase Consumption Experience over Time","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Sunk costs; Economics; Payment; Mental accounting; Consumer spending; Quality (philosophy); Microeconomics; Feeling; Production (economics); Psychology; Social psychology; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.07959776748802488,"score_gpt":0.34700365992557114,"score_spread":0.26740589243754626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098670744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974425,0.0000605954,0.00012561466,0.000037740396,0.0000070856136,0.0000072883145,0.000023260212,0.0000051145194,0.0022907767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821705,0.00009095215,0.00018747328,0.000036069745,0.000007674728,0.000009090995,0.00005940887,0.000006781759,0.001385437],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997049,0.00009374445,0.00001406972,0.00004613407,0.0000919523,0.000049154587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997703,0.0009884109,0.0006450435,0.00017733488,0.00018224036,0.0003040088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006948976,0.00014233275,0.00025522316,0.00030565503,0.000266816,0.0014276033,0.00017355126,0.0003496317,0.0050791935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048020286,0.00018276297,0.00018538,0.0002422423,0.00034756376,0.00062408973,0.0004861852,0.00056741224,0.00035664698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0069225254,0.005528748,0.7791427,0.0003356641,0.00043102243,0.0008729503,0.027016647,0.00054547016,0.078711696,0.0022279199,0.0015774777,0.09668715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025681538,0.00083415315,0.99303895,0.000012462156,0.00004616668,0.00009169544,0.0028877698,0.0003435182,0.0012970264,0.00028395918,0.0011139993,0.000024778283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009386945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002058833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050791935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021546076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120515804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016991556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099612900","doi":"10.1086/677840","title":"The Categorization of Time and Its Impact on Task Initiation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Task (project management); Psychology; Library science; Computer science; Data science; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.2159407105635714,"score_gpt":0.5187064700277652,"score_spread":0.30276575946419376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099612900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99019605,0.00015522238,0.0011864844,0.00012310689,0.00001864642,0.000039551156,0.00006604234,0.000034687415,0.008180237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971578,0.000077032324,0.0013450258,0.00003992533,0.000008741214,0.000056526533,0.00011082482,0.000046568286,0.0011575639],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99588984,0.0020150712,0.00023146054,0.0005752244,0.0008384892,0.0004498106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91311944,0.06416849,0.011244409,0.0040128715,0.0023332688,0.0051215244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00415914,0.0005183778,0.00050512614,0.0011328015,0.0009166228,0.0039510718,0.0007638977,0.0011809731,0.009760354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050616246,0.00037870233,0.0006505496,0.0008515449,0.0010693183,0.0017525094,0.002029341,0.0017956824,0.00087265973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020564133,0.0064130267,0.70687187,0.00056363153,0.0003894745,0.0011569931,0.021598937,0.007584697,0.097361654,0.013327819,0.0015811478,0.1225867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023824535,0.0027062586,0.96220744,0.00011624912,0.00015947013,0.0002580824,0.006134223,0.009101025,0.005580394,0.011006189,0.002338933,0.00015342163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034216226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021831817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009760354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014351106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00102312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032651603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100994755","doi":"10.1086/527269","title":"Automatic Effects of Brand Exposure on Motivated Behavior: How Apple Makes You “Think Different”","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":488,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.07708611479656284,"score_gpt":0.314900685001328,"score_spread":0.23781457020476515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100994755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972721,0.000040912306,0.00042135772,0.00006690764,0.000015398697,0.000016040447,0.000015774558,0.000014051996,0.0021373734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980566,0.00008029795,0.0008177095,0.000072683586,0.000018691271,0.000031132564,0.00002916737,0.000015081466,0.00087867124],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996296,0.00013586483,0.000017548935,0.0000849593,0.00009629648,0.000035711208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975592,0.0014585943,0.0005286607,0.00018301397,0.00007512168,0.00019527903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053618284,0.0002600488,0.00014496464,0.0002004864,0.00020290336,0.00064607273,0.00011824809,0.00035118056,0.0047292197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003674387,0.00021677108,0.00013410789,0.00009395397,0.00037615365,0.0003320698,0.00043928038,0.0006378894,0.00028110977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060715806,0.0060392697,0.092943765,0.00034974603,0.00011395048,0.00035517188,0.0032763153,0.00032115946,0.8125468,0.0032813137,0.0006437991,0.07405716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026177187,0.0049608815,0.9205838,0.000045505527,0.00012278878,0.00036767832,0.0006961592,0.002097366,0.06599572,0.0034745412,0.0013391329,0.000054616787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026127102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038471766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047292197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015602252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001630979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015820801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101218147","doi":"10.1086/661112","title":"The Role of Bolstering and Counterarguing Mind-Sets in Persuasion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Set (abstract data type); Cognition; Psychology; Social psychology; Persuasive communication; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.11079210181394511,"score_gpt":0.48713728915901927,"score_spread":0.37634518734507416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101218147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98265153,0.00024510015,0.006705201,0.00029978022,0.00004799137,0.000073723,0.000017344893,0.000040039668,0.009919341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99440867,0.000083763785,0.004872077,0.00008784089,0.00002038226,0.00006753242,0.000017498951,0.00001627154,0.00042591977],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966191,0.0019172858,0.00013183503,0.0004830184,0.0005981507,0.00025045918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98063993,0.012915646,0.0025799018,0.0018203475,0.0007306271,0.0013134598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042094914,0.00074000616,0.00045597696,0.00078326074,0.00064989016,0.0024318763,0.0006158709,0.0012757363,0.0026466225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022345845,0.0008919261,0.00059122016,0.00021517006,0.0022774357,0.0022566135,0.0017364697,0.002583508,0.00027767415],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066783237,0.004581808,0.08301834,0.0014415944,0.0006807798,0.0007639038,0.024590274,0.00672002,0.66298366,0.04257287,0.00068560644,0.16528282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019112966,0.0076358854,0.6368065,0.0006272826,0.0014338602,0.0016214367,0.005404078,0.042259913,0.16835655,0.12664337,0.006669926,0.0006298825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034241224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031574318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042094914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072299415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057521585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022262156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102200606","doi":"10.1086/651204","title":"Puffery in Advertisements: The Effects of Media Context, Communication Norms, and Consumer Knowledge","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Context (archaeology); Product (mathematics); Psychology; Product type; Business; Computer science; Mathematics; History","score_opus":0.0469511468924941,"score_gpt":0.3428774005618603,"score_spread":0.2959262536693662,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102200606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898587,0.00027960463,0.00016550945,0.00028703126,0.000017081713,0.000026557462,0.000036195626,0.000009212818,0.0093201725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985349,0.00015399262,0.00024737127,0.000110718036,0.00003310864,0.000020186455,0.000041325064,0.000016175043,0.0008423064],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99273175,0.004150928,0.000312304,0.0006313294,0.0018545402,0.000319152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8526361,0.11469456,0.01795093,0.005157887,0.0041637425,0.0053968197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006601466,0.000320367,0.0004901867,0.0011682871,0.0012028865,0.003937011,0.0006578552,0.0011461987,0.004422032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06855253,0.0004572584,0.00048464505,0.00073816895,0.0022672552,0.0021819314,0.0016282675,0.0018555076,0.0003695537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009210079,0.0081981635,0.8558735,0.0003579506,0.000802668,0.0007574812,0.031859886,0.0011179306,0.009228964,0.0054830667,0.0012416532,0.075868644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001223796,0.0009937643,0.9870847,0.0000693098,0.00024505972,0.0001747597,0.0051512984,0.0012962087,0.0013413796,0.0022143691,0.0012378505,0.0000688751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006487218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068200645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006601466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013002161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085387565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03491229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102890821","doi":"10.1086/662069","title":"Implicit Self-Referencing: The Effect of Nonvolitional Self-Association on Brand and Product Attitude","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Categorization; Psychology; Implicit-association test; Implicit attitude; Product (mathematics); Object (grammar); Social psychology; Advertising; Product category; Banner; Self; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05792686937929685,"score_gpt":0.43630921358642727,"score_spread":0.3783823442071304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102890821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99722666,0.00013975827,0.0009385536,0.000029873458,0.00001655847,0.000016692382,0.000008967646,0.000019031037,0.0016040123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968659,0.00010236247,0.0016464829,0.00006111924,0.000018374261,0.000028262202,0.000029172303,0.000017592234,0.0012305523],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991352,0.0003603329,0.000059893096,0.00013450974,0.00026272636,0.00004729564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99260896,0.004165933,0.0011844727,0.0012336351,0.00035648924,0.00045051804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014672442,0.00029756813,0.00031027192,0.00021464468,0.00014214097,0.0005057117,0.00028658344,0.00035694425,0.0021427006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006391185,0.00019209996,0.00017310123,0.00015978588,0.0005015681,0.0005904211,0.00054537406,0.00076867774,0.00025203192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009716315,0.014276704,0.053282797,0.0005059435,0.00026172717,0.00023896914,0.0014248305,0.00079902547,0.747095,0.0025791973,0.0002826234,0.16953683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092108943,0.022062477,0.6658303,0.000074290416,0.00035788963,0.0008097464,0.000296521,0.0069112983,0.29493415,0.004600255,0.0031187627,0.00008316276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015858888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002796449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021427006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012834932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020686678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0077596307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104380815","doi":"10.1086/426617","title":"Information Accessibility as a Moderator of Judgments: The Role of Content versus Retrieval Ease","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Content (measure theory); Library science; Information retrieval; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.1377549523686155,"score_gpt":0.37220436850369376,"score_spread":0.23444941613507825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104380815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98743457,0.00053858,0.0020747047,0.00055512553,0.000072271454,0.00031433554,0.00037715927,0.000052472005,0.008580828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99503195,0.00018045177,0.0024753043,0.0002004881,0.00007967127,0.000214722,0.00023980002,0.00007975429,0.0014978228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889788,0.004957205,0.0009809189,0.0020898366,0.002085705,0.0009076161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6638716,0.29320323,0.023879115,0.0077397833,0.00580829,0.0054980773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01188194,0.0010412937,0.0011795543,0.0017377232,0.0011079055,0.004842139,0.0010950508,0.0026847073,0.012998497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111633904,0.00084991474,0.00095512887,0.0015819563,0.0024287144,0.004622367,0.002837308,0.0027214226,0.00072761934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013705641,0.0056508607,0.8885874,0.0016745797,0.001489932,0.0011963099,0.027884552,0.0022428546,0.022679452,0.0052839927,0.0014571073,0.028147258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049279,0.0021010293,0.97645617,0.00020243156,0.0007543982,0.0003212408,0.0030350897,0.005456447,0.003370203,0.006101439,0.0015697627,0.00013900477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003702664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035828296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012998497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078710215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014215837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062838435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105527445","doi":"10.1086/432230","title":"The Influence of a Mere Social Presence in a Retail Context","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":540,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Social influence; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.15619626540531237,"score_gpt":0.49443397126232924,"score_spread":0.33823770585701685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105527445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97871053,0.0000949433,0.0008883428,0.00012213828,0.000012917701,0.00002284013,0.000010258395,0.000008831498,0.020129165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961936,0.000019284109,0.00016869564,0.000015931293,0.0000051990614,0.0000037725085,0.0000037888597,0.0000021246888,0.0001618033],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969746,0.0018647253,0.000079704114,0.0003331063,0.0005307629,0.00021699592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871328,0.009031663,0.0010799094,0.0008073228,0.0006250447,0.0013232904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015963536,0.000263344,0.00035784254,0.00048381052,0.0014361549,0.0028492757,0.0004472871,0.00068828464,0.0043803896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009715952,0.00020816395,0.00028589193,0.00019569167,0.0028679944,0.0016068468,0.002646776,0.0007560556,0.00019668291],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00859541,0.0056523546,0.47403586,0.0016310528,0.0005182069,0.003976636,0.056900367,0.0045147073,0.2031661,0.06460975,0.0014822634,0.17491731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030199956,0.0056070546,0.9032563,0.0001750258,0.00047490702,0.0015577121,0.036217775,0.0074582836,0.014063029,0.021424104,0.009302526,0.00016128855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001426571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019150494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043803896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005952235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038062822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014653802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107461833","doi":"10.1086/513048","title":"Explaining Cognitive Lock-In: The Role of Skill-Based Habits of Use in Consumer Choice","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Consumption (sociology); Preference; Consumer choice; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; New product development; Psychology; Computer science; Microeconomics; Marketing; Economics; Business; Mathematics","score_opus":0.31521481904714405,"score_gpt":0.5151390014624746,"score_spread":0.19992418241533055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107461833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92238307,0.00024944506,0.0657907,0.0012841637,0.000024853787,0.000076194294,0.00006598893,0.00006309143,0.010062623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921943,0.000100512654,0.0068608294,0.00016858405,0.000016285036,0.000051799267,0.000032358414,0.000008438895,0.0005668655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992772,0.0003088979,0.00003329896,0.00012760329,0.00014619424,0.00010682609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977988,0.016466372,0.0029812923,0.0015769103,0.00057426695,0.00041310658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00232072,0.0005565059,0.00042028463,0.0006973413,0.00041377993,0.0013963451,0.00075953663,0.00095413113,0.0038978874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016670456,0.00027582925,0.0007003566,0.0005130994,0.0023127508,0.0022785065,0.0012728142,0.0012614003,0.0003404545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015196021,0.0031708293,0.4376417,0.0007811063,0.00045438815,0.0010377071,0.0119763585,0.046058938,0.018245328,0.31327224,0.0022428608,0.1635988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028056887,0.0014899403,0.17950645,0.00010265832,0.00020671563,0.0005489536,0.0018113205,0.17238794,0.007789085,0.63109624,0.004613129,0.00016701783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020590601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015060209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038978874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00079444493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055993826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013039708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107488010","doi":"10.1086/322896","title":"Affect Monitoring and the Primacy of Feelings in Judgment","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.39898533093959654,"score_gpt":0.5488671100228116,"score_spread":0.1498817790832151,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107488010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9800828,0.0007780115,0.0054924884,0.00016102433,0.000027837148,0.000019215337,0.000027370495,0.000022344964,0.013388982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987556,0.0001233444,0.00086730893,0.000026884316,0.000014616148,0.000006235248,0.000012518117,0.000008613205,0.00018489739],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985764,0.0006667102,0.0000893644,0.00022245228,0.00035483926,0.00009014959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98404735,0.010877903,0.0028718691,0.0012628085,0.00057546014,0.00036456014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021134424,0.00021520616,0.00019651851,0.00048626098,0.0003706404,0.0023402683,0.00018191228,0.00052249565,0.001407534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03140319,0.00026380713,0.00021681655,0.00027675886,0.0011527785,0.0015774544,0.0010467062,0.00072705094,0.0001365683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068834545,0.0007380119,0.3222085,0.001405415,0.0005331302,0.0011481859,0.02283173,0.0043269335,0.22419529,0.040471897,0.00091800216,0.37433943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007737873,0.0005755591,0.9390577,0.000096807205,0.00015769913,0.0006127151,0.0011500599,0.0036227345,0.01724783,0.03561515,0.0017061239,0.00008024689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037404997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034485006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023402683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027629273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018030149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011177123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110907425","doi":"10.1086/655855","title":"No Pain, No Gain? How Fluency and Construal Level Affect Consumer Confidence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Fluency; Construal level theory; Psychology; Processing fluency; Affect (linguistics); Feeling; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.23171519206671334,"score_gpt":0.4617065616560336,"score_spread":0.22999136958932023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110907425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960174,0.00015332848,0.00038160055,0.00030786847,0.0000110459905,0.0000054131006,0.000015665553,0.0000031887716,0.0031044816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955744,0.000051086965,0.00013389348,0.00006553024,0.000008500491,0.0000031719212,0.00001065434,0.000002240524,0.0001674876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900395,0.0004939255,0.000044988963,0.00008646119,0.0002514299,0.00011928697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98210645,0.012710879,0.0028809812,0.0006334847,0.00081066205,0.00085757644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023065787,0.00015938476,0.00023314741,0.00032004705,0.00023753628,0.0020291575,0.00017377977,0.0007925093,0.0025726599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023001758,0.00019727905,0.00032634588,0.00016633082,0.0011257414,0.0008314589,0.00042488784,0.0010150176,0.00020828903],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007996146,0.0019610624,0.8375092,0.0003676089,0.0010520031,0.00086931785,0.018684516,0.0020693105,0.027914673,0.0074566687,0.0013597335,0.0927597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016722102,0.0012230617,0.97484314,0.00008400899,0.00032074223,0.0006030265,0.0064524994,0.0030530256,0.0030080632,0.008974681,0.0011805871,0.00008992947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000867632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007247212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025726599,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003257158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021266539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012198508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111501735","doi":"10.1086/671139","title":"The Dual Role of Power in Resisting Social Influence","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Reactance; Certainty; Social psychology; Psychology; Power (physics); Dual (grammatical number); Autonomy; Stern; Interpretation (philosophy); Resistance (ecology); Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.06765603588071609,"score_gpt":0.45841486368075673,"score_spread":0.3907588278000407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111501735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94814676,0.00020027024,0.012120829,0.00096075813,0.000035156078,0.000046092424,0.000009565097,0.00003857305,0.038442023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839145,0.00005187485,0.00085723115,0.00007346807,0.00001785618,0.000013239009,0.0000038287067,0.000006636916,0.0005843328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970114,0.0012392567,0.000109325585,0.00037056732,0.0009546562,0.00031477885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863434,0.008524269,0.0021407753,0.0016504071,0.000611785,0.0007293402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003463361,0.00040709393,0.0003066948,0.0007408197,0.00067986234,0.0025843938,0.00046810915,0.00096002803,0.0037774674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011263981,0.00027115952,0.00050041935,0.00022929718,0.004966438,0.0023932036,0.0018455012,0.0019409427,0.00023191584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023103831,0.00215664,0.09473698,0.0011199624,0.0005353947,0.003286914,0.057438042,0.004840084,0.24317689,0.37403825,0.0010633531,0.21529718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010460386,0.009391795,0.35822266,0.00054068986,0.000886538,0.006702194,0.023910223,0.015799241,0.15760465,0.38492793,0.0404636,0.0005044198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022024885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019081279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037774674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045306864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043411995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01831621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112266536","doi":"10.1086/665048","title":"Is Noise Always Bad? Exploring the Effects of Ambient Noise on Creative Cognition","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Color perception and design","field":"Psychology","cited_by":329,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Noise (video); Cognition; Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.23893692841464748,"score_gpt":0.45048803833579537,"score_spread":0.2115511099211479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112266536","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957153,0.0003594932,0.0007396652,0.0001967037,0.000010263681,0.0000067295337,0.000007388649,0.0000026876692,0.0029617827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990938,0.00022275078,0.00044817984,0.000069315036,0.000010586222,0.0000066250864,0.0000068324957,0.0000028528511,0.00013906433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981621,0.0009261536,0.00007393654,0.00020443232,0.0004860092,0.00014752509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799967,0.016279493,0.002207074,0.00042827945,0.0005684711,0.0005200336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028321515,0.00033573064,0.00038798916,0.0006136596,0.00059524644,0.0030331293,0.00033911908,0.0008589653,0.0009902607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014588787,0.00022544771,0.00052194064,0.00040569442,0.002373332,0.0018483388,0.0011771937,0.0010109479,0.00009550968],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036487936,0.003098419,0.72411674,0.0012151058,0.0012272168,0.0010900637,0.0533608,0.003831185,0.048737805,0.012904048,0.000526846,0.14624299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094603485,0.0019832852,0.94339883,0.00021097831,0.0005216995,0.00039171314,0.02329013,0.0033216013,0.0053778314,0.019776579,0.0015194974,0.0001133581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011614027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001657079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030331293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005055108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044042105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014977992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120919614","doi":"10.1086/518528","title":"Pursuing Parenthood: Integrating Cultural and Cognitive Perspectives on Persistent Goal Striving","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.13322240854242381,"score_gpt":0.4019283774731652,"score_spread":0.2687059689307414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120919614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94210297,0.0019441233,0.005840571,0.0045011225,0.000040276158,0.000015068844,0.000012874064,0.000008393851,0.04553462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983365,0.000561996,0.00058734906,0.00016828242,0.00000727058,0.0000048770858,0.000004369837,0.0000032978621,0.00032612632],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984871,0.0010014976,0.000041443538,0.00009337878,0.00023207614,0.00014447734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963971,0.0022830188,0.00051267404,0.00016448688,0.00035105716,0.00029166273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003886582,0.00029653328,0.00019906333,0.0015602005,0.0024259826,0.006534499,0.00059114804,0.001041643,0.0009031791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047673993,0.00023730811,0.0002264944,0.000908917,0.013534626,0.005026546,0.003626653,0.0021179353,0.00006353522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000504209,0.00006794768,0.024006365,0.00008593439,0.000021684415,0.0006797895,0.8742289,0.00017137098,0.0007885313,0.07942073,0.00025559196,0.020222753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011315504,0.00010346123,0.030753301,0.00024987225,0.000045554792,0.0009845371,0.892529,0.00081965054,0.000693395,0.055448886,0.01830846,0.00005243065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053026644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072876564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006534499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020505874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015496121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020554423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2124559341","doi":"10.1086/429597","title":"Designing the Solution: The Impact of Constraints on Consumers’ Creativity","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":384,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Variety (cybernetics); Task (project management); Process (computing); Marketing; Computer science; Business; Process management; Knowledge management; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Management","score_opus":0.2565957772671592,"score_gpt":0.5298709571608374,"score_spread":0.2732751798936782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2124559341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9475672,0.00038727766,0.009798312,0.00078202545,0.000021204949,0.00008724053,0.000064479704,0.000058804028,0.041233476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936255,0.00013825479,0.005203448,0.00011710425,0.000012975288,0.000054390643,0.00006257674,0.000054866086,0.000730794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99030674,0.005021483,0.0006595609,0.0007545888,0.0027103093,0.0005473779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8709914,0.10892203,0.008962114,0.004573475,0.004410489,0.0021404848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006850166,0.000554094,0.0003690446,0.00089077104,0.001399657,0.008234817,0.0011162998,0.001430741,0.0072546927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09581989,0.0005803099,0.00064449955,0.00093346403,0.002779476,0.0042692213,0.0027372167,0.0019881413,0.00053147494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006792266,0.0027279223,0.41142333,0.002788407,0.00072247843,0.004268552,0.117819965,0.018504463,0.062169477,0.06084574,0.005837672,0.3060998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010719557,0.0020370574,0.64069164,0.0014133508,0.0007691837,0.0055008284,0.08982797,0.06668423,0.03099373,0.12381998,0.036494073,0.0006960165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022340638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017346159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008234817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011385216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013377131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036227584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126767049","doi":"10.1086/519146","title":"The Influence of Ceiling Height: The Effect of Priming on the Type of Processing That People Use","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":278,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Ceiling (cloud); Salient; Priming (agriculture); Prime (order theory); Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Ceiling effect; Computer science; Mathematics; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.13100644925832053,"score_gpt":0.3854206546041197,"score_spread":0.25441420534579917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126767049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701387,0.0006605553,0.006139147,0.00041227997,0.00013806846,0.000106329615,0.000077054334,0.0001310756,0.02219686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99591994,0.00015547866,0.00279162,0.0002738005,0.00006146506,0.00006100209,0.00003989064,0.0000865715,0.0006100899],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984847,0.0007025487,0.00009015327,0.00030609357,0.00030783098,0.000108796215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97983485,0.016011212,0.001803797,0.0014378257,0.0004896618,0.00042261597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002301795,0.00040717056,0.0003129862,0.00025911425,0.000534132,0.0012888242,0.00025858538,0.0005939244,0.0052735214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018873954,0.0004387186,0.00027825264,0.0001910921,0.001294942,0.0013182479,0.0013037856,0.001135244,0.00044433505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014209709,0.0013716413,0.08475656,0.001146181,0.00019952982,0.0009860798,0.035827417,0.00095864915,0.7440515,0.014462152,0.00224662,0.099783875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075387483,0.008695569,0.8221922,0.0003873512,0.00069777435,0.0023264869,0.0076937745,0.0033233997,0.11459636,0.025933288,0.013082496,0.0003174696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042218922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036704174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052735214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029866918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024509802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017641664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2127215179","doi":"10.1086/663772","title":"Psychological Distance and Subjective Experience: How Distancing Reduces the Feeling of Difficulty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Mindset; Task (project management); Feeling; Distancing; Psychology; Social distance; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Anxiety; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.3410252385993576,"score_gpt":0.5196003611350664,"score_spread":0.17857512253570873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2127215179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99741566,0.00011671314,0.0009556313,0.00005013125,0.00001176296,0.0000142452545,0.00001638842,0.0000105458175,0.0014088878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99875987,0.000048351194,0.00083675544,0.00003939214,0.000008407027,0.0000179208,0.000017978437,0.0000055140413,0.00026578608],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993637,0.00030125774,0.00003180291,0.00007282648,0.00017307779,0.000057352507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690527,0.0015054173,0.00080705277,0.0002710109,0.00013585774,0.00037540798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050535396,0.0003454631,0.00024805666,0.00020634336,0.00017363766,0.00079433253,0.00026228756,0.0003855498,0.0028847135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004708699,0.00016611241,0.0002216498,0.00011172274,0.0006876896,0.0004509784,0.00080266845,0.0007577015,0.0001246523],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00994947,0.0061307023,0.0795902,0.0023422143,0.00085448154,0.0006144232,0.019102234,0.0021257512,0.7774356,0.003226253,0.0011152845,0.097513415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061460247,0.016317595,0.9298436,0.00013953798,0.00039334837,0.000655791,0.0074949344,0.0030619048,0.034974482,0.0027608385,0.0035795672,0.00016382725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015383601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019603474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028847135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013482606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082983504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00965035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128957565","doi":"10.1086/676980","title":"Should the Devil Sell Prada? Retail Rejection Increases Aspiring Consumers' Desire for the Brand","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Brand names; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.23803831585211668,"score_gpt":0.3776907803814259,"score_spread":0.1396524645293092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128957565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993626,0.00008569642,0.00006426003,0.0006372515,0.000021799018,0.000006244393,0.000008012745,0.000006142671,0.005544632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849534,0.00009419463,0.00008086615,0.00023099035,0.00002602689,0.0000022040997,0.000013380704,0.0000031317943,0.0010538037],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952984,0.00014354994,0.000023721039,0.00004478827,0.00019102072,0.000067179906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646807,0.0010007044,0.0015733112,0.0002002512,0.0002529523,0.00050476985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007911025,0.000115967545,0.0001983812,0.00033469664,0.0004119663,0.0010814588,0.00021095465,0.00064018613,0.0077865617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069967723,0.0001261276,0.00022616834,0.0001566392,0.00077572174,0.00060633774,0.0003964011,0.0012640541,0.00063131773],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014576687,0.0038544307,0.9073239,0.00018008993,0.00016152873,0.0015554021,0.007200977,0.00012787947,0.0137190595,0.0028245144,0.0025255347,0.059069008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069043104,0.0016827118,0.9743774,0.000059391125,0.00008569198,0.0018070327,0.012504786,0.0006737317,0.0020280583,0.0013765029,0.0053069293,0.000028760922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00096415525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012150713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077865617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015358816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020016704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02604866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130653301","doi":"10.1086/518544","title":"Is That Car Smiling at Me? Schema Congruity as a Basis for Evaluating Anthropomorphized Products","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1018,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Schema (genetic algorithms); Psychology; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Product (mathematics); Social psychology; Computer science; Information retrieval; Mathematics","score_opus":0.3286068019301628,"score_gpt":0.47151533368215626,"score_spread":0.14290853175199347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130653301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97978485,0.00010129815,0.0052315714,0.00019542588,0.000008437218,0.000036002762,0.000019236737,0.000017106766,0.014606137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774337,0.000041373587,0.0019738867,0.000027647993,0.0000025074241,0.000007877979,0.000021790125,0.0000045133334,0.0001770546],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990953,0.00039279944,0.00004430072,0.00013011992,0.00027838847,0.000059092563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422437,0.0022034165,0.0021566225,0.00056078046,0.0005950617,0.00025973152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022438148,0.00020270709,0.00015136633,0.0011677281,0.00035399807,0.0021574567,0.00026185933,0.00048615388,0.0023777662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012270957,0.00019933189,0.00031952417,0.0004900224,0.0017318941,0.0020563263,0.000939801,0.000638809,0.00016221633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014862607,0.00062896323,0.6563287,0.00048952556,0.00033753965,0.0010250915,0.05074421,0.0034946885,0.039564308,0.06542314,0.0009957198,0.17948191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007779659,0.0008492289,0.9149841,0.0001886048,0.00020736935,0.0011452143,0.026983729,0.012729519,0.0066696545,0.030835895,0.005217445,0.00011146164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007847168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009929475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023777662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051138364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034567658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0118665695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132095645","doi":"10.1086/586913","title":"Designing Discrete Choice Experiments: Do Optimal Designs Come at a Price?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Discrete choice; Econometrics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Management science; Mathematical economics","score_opus":0.4150813394674372,"score_gpt":0.36438715237877267,"score_spread":0.05069418708866452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132095645","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025958002,0.016309835,0.84583294,0.09394381,0.004132884,0.0028472713,0.00042991363,0.00065952446,0.009885841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14041565,0.007985328,0.81941235,0.020342128,0.0029526001,0.0075840075,0.00019576868,0.00028350134,0.0008287233],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6255219,0.3197486,0.014813861,0.009833447,0.028823795,0.001258312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.23816295,0.70181113,0.015897926,0.02767834,0.0138897905,0.0025598619],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3530302,0.0021662342,0.0076050055,0.002810578,0.0017911769,0.008360079,0.004401745,0.008896954,0.004438725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6373899,0.0028203926,0.0026164362,0.003904753,0.013746865,0.016491292,0.0036679248,0.010426885,0.0015586028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026921814,0.0013892931,0.010926993,0.008124804,0.00397415,0.00027602568,0.0033402645,0.023811955,0.0020563372,0.39709225,0.022527926,0.5237878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021007922,0.0012502362,0.0048690382,0.0019317364,0.0005562939,0.00018104484,0.00078687345,0.022663545,0.0010873387,0.9486006,0.015617918,0.00035452607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012532216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018839685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3530302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005018597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005395406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7978289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132311998","doi":"10.1086/649028","title":"Context Effects from Bodily Sensations: Examining Bodily Sensations Induced by Flooring and the Moderating Role of Product Viewing Distance","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Context (archaeology); Product placement; Psychology; Advertising; Social psychology; Aesthetics; Art; History; Business","score_opus":0.09907022352010161,"score_gpt":0.41527375678730183,"score_spread":0.3162035332672002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132311998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919674,0.00037211244,0.0012390269,0.00009043272,0.000044517194,0.000092578324,0.00014944884,0.000016654414,0.006027934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962877,0.00017624295,0.0020258122,0.0001141611,0.000039152193,0.00016932833,0.00014068729,0.000034907436,0.0010118879],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985078,0.0005243059,0.000072421964,0.00044422067,0.00030758456,0.00014374258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98420644,0.011650602,0.0020407438,0.0008085424,0.00045046603,0.0008432227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013051486,0.00090709457,0.00072315644,0.00048852654,0.0005597421,0.0019075396,0.00055949704,0.0009023667,0.010693834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01043608,0.00045001775,0.00091210165,0.0004238118,0.0011908789,0.0015253607,0.0024640136,0.0020726721,0.00031734718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028513381,0.0068927216,0.34130192,0.0042981654,0.0015457991,0.0012856241,0.022699509,0.0018737073,0.5234755,0.006783543,0.0008352236,0.060494944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002302453,0.0034461517,0.9750429,0.00007626175,0.0005649557,0.00020109527,0.0012820429,0.0011988279,0.015067346,0.0018515512,0.0009811715,0.0000573908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015860179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018159446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010693834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046858995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052726123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03577447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133243910","doi":"10.1086/661552","title":"The Lonely Consumer: Loner or Conformer?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":159,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Popularity; Loneliness; Product (mathematics); Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Advertising; Subject (documents); Marketing; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.272647182809796,"score_gpt":0.5360545112075095,"score_spread":0.26340732839771347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133243910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908512,0.0012029756,0.00019258553,0.003370894,0.00014230234,0.000017508803,0.00004505447,0.000008271179,0.0041691135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676454,0.0006325876,0.00012537568,0.0015963294,0.000093179115,0.0000126698515,0.00003684221,0.0000052558935,0.0007332303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992593,0.0003613781,0.000053952477,0.00008653997,0.00016209386,0.00007666175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650466,0.0010469453,0.0013788893,0.00018216646,0.00033635428,0.0005509874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014089698,0.00023788055,0.0004893932,0.0006223984,0.0010894497,0.002536215,0.00024434857,0.0011883983,0.0032040698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006874402,0.00020593044,0.00033716715,0.00036108214,0.002094222,0.002328211,0.0012258412,0.0015987615,0.00028947834],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010355458,0.00056183385,0.8040225,0.00049413805,0.00036192167,0.002534093,0.08798157,0.00006093501,0.004311618,0.002203985,0.0064209257,0.090010926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006820273,0.0007330765,0.73796815,0.00043313473,0.00027699806,0.004710104,0.24016775,0.00046880706,0.00095092505,0.002592418,0.011492492,0.00013798987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011846704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026612112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032040698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033774655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020920658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010718703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135085173","doi":"10.1086/677842","title":"Creating the Responsible Consumer: Moralistic Governance Regimes and Consumer Subjectivity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":584,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Subjectivity; Consumption (sociology); Governmentality; Consumerism; Corporate governance; Transformative learning; Consumer research; Sociology; Marketing; Consumer protection; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.07605749329857354,"score_gpt":0.34379715346717565,"score_spread":0.2677396601686021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135085173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7268637,0.000571221,0.024921933,0.017428579,0.000079869475,0.000086396656,0.000020635633,0.0000385082,0.22998916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981427,0.00006178593,0.0007214513,0.00018371925,0.000011920919,0.00001533761,0.000003204142,0.000005922555,0.0008540143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99348724,0.004858899,0.00013159408,0.00037187664,0.0006903392,0.00046004093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879848,0.00661468,0.0022825152,0.0015333912,0.0007269275,0.0008577254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008072722,0.00018714374,0.0001866266,0.0011208833,0.004374874,0.0077975253,0.00068149774,0.0017815782,0.002646917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011825295,0.00017547046,0.0002581142,0.00084099185,0.042375393,0.0065738154,0.0051483545,0.002629367,0.00016059834],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020445596,0.000084937856,0.010115013,0.000026727927,0.00000557429,0.0002063922,0.09616175,0.000271336,0.00022368712,0.88381237,0.0007088264,0.008362912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031011605,0.00006352848,0.020374043,0.00020458156,0.000016610687,0.00029920673,0.124632746,0.0034869516,0.0008393413,0.80803365,0.0419609,0.00005742227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027300399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002566608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008072722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004060585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037665607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042693138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136216933","doi":"10.1086/497557","title":"Role of Relationship Norms in Processing Brand Information","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":195,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.07245989053818405,"score_gpt":0.348081727966878,"score_spread":0.27562183742869395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136216933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9176059,0.00045026836,0.019202253,0.0011288892,0.000050407343,0.0001042862,0.00008617313,0.00007037862,0.061301403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99549425,0.00015847395,0.0034613516,0.000091812464,0.00003307967,0.000036712012,0.00004798558,0.000019026389,0.0006571702],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99519473,0.0028633478,0.0002262428,0.00041986775,0.0010843996,0.00021135282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94169956,0.035384905,0.011934307,0.0036376899,0.005205664,0.0021378046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006534976,0.00036967595,0.00018892658,0.0010491962,0.0008355535,0.00345257,0.00051319407,0.00064620574,0.0029832232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043943707,0.00026271932,0.00021736177,0.0005595866,0.0017227918,0.0033953327,0.0010461012,0.0012312264,0.00026657418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013703689,0.0018337815,0.5862092,0.00043501813,0.00036519463,0.001133131,0.04596318,0.0025308996,0.018794097,0.103400014,0.0008788404,0.23708618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001482763,0.0014477624,0.83835834,0.00034471657,0.00030622803,0.0015230197,0.018227205,0.014583959,0.010374847,0.103096224,0.011368095,0.00022132773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017660705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018366395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006534976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072989136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011945537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03456068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137125733","doi":"10.1086/664804","title":"Identifiable but Not Identical: Combining Social Identity and Uniqueness Motives in Choice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Dimension (graph theory); Clothing; Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Identification (biology); Collective identity; Psychology; Consumer choice; Advertising; Social group; Marketing; Business; Mathematics; Political science; Pure mathematics; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.21067065942455693,"score_gpt":0.422619209964208,"score_spread":0.21194855053965106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137125733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99447024,0.000058587346,0.0014667232,0.00019980874,0.0000039819256,0.000008550842,0.0000040140594,0.0000030921433,0.00378489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993,0.0000151240065,0.00052619237,0.000017894326,0.0000024565043,0.0000029369062,0.0000026478742,0.0000013098606,0.00013144006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760985,0.0017015848,0.00007443317,0.00012850134,0.00032953708,0.00015609013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99420434,0.0030909914,0.0013101804,0.00039117524,0.00038292314,0.0006203675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004208474,0.00023217048,0.00036737658,0.0010912088,0.00095053937,0.0027418232,0.00032980856,0.00074843585,0.002065535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008251478,0.0002964739,0.00040215443,0.0006727092,0.0029250237,0.0027933537,0.0027761909,0.0007797814,0.0001126077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016752346,0.0010717678,0.7748993,0.00021419907,0.00041217371,0.00061196473,0.020734906,0.0027183653,0.009648987,0.08647903,0.0005094335,0.101024665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012237363,0.0008939827,0.81614035,0.00012091819,0.0003632543,0.0007472604,0.034089968,0.024701321,0.0035562974,0.11463501,0.004454923,0.00017440919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008281443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015160339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004208474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000687683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005110852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022256792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138425783","doi":"10.1086/600485","title":"Escaping the Gift Economy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":155,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sharing economy; Economics; Microeconomics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.12464607154512121,"score_gpt":0.36946232094239556,"score_spread":0.24481624939727437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138425783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64755803,0.0016847953,0.02731922,0.013805232,0.0003322081,0.00004523792,0.000054976135,0.00014169278,0.30905867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99365294,0.0001884996,0.0009055024,0.00042045146,0.000021672171,0.000008446538,0.0000062813783,0.000026291764,0.0047699446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965078,0.0022499897,0.000052648957,0.00022548495,0.0005023782,0.0004616967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752074,0.0009540046,0.00040462895,0.00044697113,0.0003396365,0.00033392353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005206747,0.00033057856,0.00034577202,0.0013757009,0.0065700673,0.006237965,0.0006382494,0.0013428394,0.0049029994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074195773,0.00019632766,0.00028930232,0.00067887915,0.035997044,0.0064413575,0.0077085695,0.0020748214,0.0004407033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010149608,0.000041537674,0.00735097,0.00012849826,0.000016218848,0.00089196913,0.17587331,0.0002426364,0.0017163092,0.7727751,0.0039140373,0.03694806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004609976,0.00016385377,0.011237779,0.000409355,0.000042975524,0.0012398771,0.2701538,0.0014614627,0.002679918,0.37402582,0.33846363,0.0000754826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009561855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013506183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009561855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058784485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031609403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042651355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140254044","doi":"10.1086/524416","title":"What's Not to Like? Preference Asymmetry in the False Consensus Effect","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Psychology; Social psychology; Preference; Valence (chemistry); Population; Economics; Microeconomics; Sociology","score_opus":0.2618581401152548,"score_gpt":0.5005381170111023,"score_spread":0.23867997689584747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140254044","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96127033,0.0007988396,0.009758773,0.0027230973,0.00013057186,0.000048520156,0.00014605712,0.000047128815,0.025076794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99831283,0.00009342376,0.0008667896,0.00032339283,0.00004759335,0.000012157681,0.00003324633,0.000013599709,0.00029695616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444723,0.0029437712,0.000356206,0.0005570849,0.0014423648,0.00025332658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9082843,0.06735388,0.012996247,0.0067084283,0.0030844926,0.0015726052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01220873,0.00037489066,0.00069527124,0.0010817543,0.00072947895,0.002040907,0.00054060743,0.0014384285,0.007723553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0884061,0.0003505006,0.00042573118,0.0006814714,0.0024331212,0.0034472814,0.0015708138,0.0022169086,0.00043061186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012043191,0.0010292509,0.5702756,0.0009926228,0.0009076847,0.002139653,0.0179612,0.0029670126,0.0397002,0.10094003,0.006454616,0.24458888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006112347,0.0011560936,0.76802903,0.000293178,0.00069735793,0.00401979,0.0070647034,0.013351223,0.009714565,0.18740726,0.0073502744,0.00030533754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009094298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008152914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01220873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005986762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034058906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06456673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140455186","doi":"10.1086/659379","title":"Predicting Consumption Time: The Role of Event Valence and Unpacking","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Unpacking; Consumption (sociology); Event (particle physics); Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08410826941779002,"score_gpt":0.3257176325927037,"score_spread":0.24160936317491366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140455186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99551564,0.00012968054,0.0014717866,0.000115399685,0.000009015797,0.000012987158,0.00006270134,0.000007867469,0.0026749193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905795,0.00009047779,0.0005478989,0.00003168252,0.000010381441,0.000007899079,0.00008953147,0.0000047801254,0.00015949162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999624,0.00018731189,0.000019928155,0.000064194464,0.00006515416,0.00003932784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932689,0.003976215,0.0015660855,0.00041166192,0.00026592406,0.00051117124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012433236,0.00028782606,0.0002696647,0.0003902646,0.00020267405,0.0018604987,0.00022860388,0.00052431616,0.0022371367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008604168,0.00024023367,0.00040188254,0.0004040878,0.00041745344,0.00077620463,0.00048182812,0.0005432252,0.00017383878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009425142,0.0003556406,0.9701946,0.000043685443,0.00023049796,0.00007763798,0.00091589015,0.0013808837,0.0030276868,0.0008508721,0.00019268287,0.021787394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012345569,0.0001372786,0.99249375,0.000011603021,0.000060996183,0.000050455525,0.00031288966,0.0048964,0.00038866478,0.0014483776,0.00017212454,0.000015011072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016753401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021528169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022371367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023458159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017759674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007483959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140793066","doi":"10.1086/524309","title":"Context Effects in Diverse-Category Brand Environments: The Influence of Target Product Positioning and Consumers' Processing Mind-Set","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Product (mathematics); Contrast (vision); Context (archaeology); Similarity (geometry); Product category; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Geography","score_opus":0.06046322353269883,"score_gpt":0.3139910798099102,"score_spread":0.25352785627721136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140793066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99545586,0.00015780685,0.00077444845,0.000040392366,0.000005377206,0.000011336073,0.000020200507,0.0000083308505,0.003526295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989342,0.000034334036,0.0008451398,0.00003660162,0.000004338935,0.000012513408,0.000019659112,0.000007020336,0.000106168976],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907124,0.00036571937,0.000038774873,0.00024961834,0.00020954102,0.00006509219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99000436,0.007519914,0.0010123686,0.00067349756,0.00036502056,0.00042485262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012924789,0.00039211052,0.0004294477,0.0006375247,0.00047173636,0.0017495553,0.00047347954,0.00076057494,0.004123957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012249949,0.00034314083,0.00035558554,0.00031189984,0.0009460692,0.0015946621,0.0023156495,0.00082848564,0.00022466642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013132152,0.0018781811,0.43331006,0.0012763952,0.0006049709,0.0010681864,0.018794648,0.0031165935,0.41927707,0.013996969,0.00044218378,0.093102634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021719976,0.0019224326,0.9643819,0.00007297079,0.00030382117,0.0004646888,0.0027464689,0.0031218685,0.017579503,0.0081749875,0.0009361082,0.000078083554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008089573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013316498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004123957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041197374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018899089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0137960315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143009344","doi":"10.1086/678302","title":"How Nonconsumption Shapes Desire","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Library science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13847096422927543,"score_gpt":0.3579486925025264,"score_spread":0.219477728273251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143009344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9242823,0.00026961823,0.0045277695,0.0013818855,0.000020594767,0.000018587005,0.00006681944,0.000021932636,0.069410436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99874026,0.00004728813,0.00046059766,0.000049897895,0.0000027677477,0.0000057572756,0.000021206564,0.000006518475,0.00066573115],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982492,0.0010218954,0.00006034498,0.00022344996,0.00027829892,0.00016685318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940665,0.003181141,0.00070458505,0.0007900025,0.000554553,0.00070322334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020328194,0.00016172088,0.00023895942,0.0006839839,0.0013458342,0.0060060346,0.00046681293,0.0008468275,0.005373623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008528342,0.00035868157,0.0005352224,0.00059381913,0.003727091,0.0033640168,0.0020218436,0.0012118211,0.00031506122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014774174,0.00088056136,0.38548556,0.00032367636,0.00027495768,0.0016001756,0.14001687,0.002576421,0.015045797,0.35405338,0.0018509103,0.096414335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115534094,0.00061579037,0.5906412,0.00018513639,0.00019672007,0.0013840095,0.07997147,0.009963117,0.003923225,0.28509188,0.027676977,0.00023491155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002977659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002940196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060060346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001503011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007210864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017976582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143892618","doi":"10.1086/658148","title":"Gaming with Mr. Slot or Gaming the Slot Machine? Power, Anthropomorphism, and Risk Perception","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":435,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Feeling; Power (physics); Risk perception; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.31362238347682153,"score_gpt":0.383835197049509,"score_spread":0.0702128135726875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143892618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99201477,0.0001945969,0.0004982379,0.0005365862,0.000016752927,0.00001228015,0.000011786224,0.000004358001,0.006710553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889344,0.000111757814,0.00028655736,0.00013981402,0.00001009625,0.000006304493,0.000006870529,0.0000013750404,0.00054384995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995153,0.0002584598,0.000019651085,0.00005262174,0.000100135265,0.000053864187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708015,0.0010864127,0.0011247905,0.00012448023,0.00012274637,0.00046131117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010706797,0.00025528081,0.00021889184,0.00036568343,0.0004891824,0.0018643306,0.00019603904,0.0006479896,0.0035482142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006904541,0.00017987409,0.00027780732,0.00012059626,0.0013509593,0.0010593211,0.0004376666,0.00070686353,0.00033270352],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011239762,0.001590998,0.90637565,0.00016391191,0.0002700503,0.0006837144,0.028749008,0.00051758403,0.0041895513,0.006523629,0.0015598704,0.04825201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010057858,0.0013849637,0.94084543,0.00010432378,0.00022287408,0.0014361091,0.037555292,0.0026783277,0.0013402001,0.009819099,0.004412202,0.00010061868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010948923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021057534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035482142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002681398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013662131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011869907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147028152","doi":"10.1086/425104","title":"Adversaries of Consumption: Consumer Movements, Activism, and Ideology","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1000,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Mainstream; Consumerism; Social movement; Consumption (sociology); Identity (music); Sociology; Value (mathematics); Nike; Collective identity; Movement (music); Advertising; Environmental ethics; Aesthetics; Political science; Politics; Social science; Law; Business; Art","score_opus":0.05849373736573007,"score_gpt":0.3151746075908871,"score_spread":0.25668087022515707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147028152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88659865,0.0008794565,0.0005838785,0.007584969,0.00006461722,0.0000149279285,0.000027127026,0.000007200962,0.10423926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981183,0.00024717327,0.00006743282,0.00022103601,0.00004302418,0.000008351076,0.00001250934,0.000003617394,0.001278442],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857986,0.0008047121,0.000024876534,0.00010792197,0.00019045155,0.00029214224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940906,0.0033909574,0.0015455612,0.00016452718,0.00020576808,0.0006026494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016930753,0.00019167768,0.00016018526,0.00102316,0.0026876824,0.0044816886,0.0003994335,0.0011229556,0.0044320794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059602065,0.00012413146,0.00012444411,0.0007820909,0.007194289,0.0019674685,0.00361651,0.0015861546,0.000197321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056880096,0.00080236665,0.4186649,0.00022847003,0.000091200425,0.0018417836,0.24635227,0.00063495163,0.0016165184,0.23947434,0.0071542645,0.08257009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004779065,0.00022553316,0.41394022,0.0003580102,0.00005356149,0.0009593628,0.45838055,0.0015584696,0.0010150454,0.06044947,0.06296049,0.00005161442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021358198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027347642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044816886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016774973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008546684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014826775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147100389","doi":"10.1086/668406","title":"Money Isn’t Everything, but It Helps If It Doesn’t Look Used: How the Physical Appearance of Money Influences Spending","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Pride; Currency; Context (archaeology); Economics; Electronic money; Monetary economics; Commerce; Advertising; Business; Payment; Law; Finance; Political science; History","score_opus":0.2642895616233699,"score_gpt":0.4073350627658655,"score_spread":0.1430455011424956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147100389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896125,0.00011832153,0.00021299967,0.0002593557,0.000011537076,0.0000037490606,0.000016187365,0.0000028296288,0.009762426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984133,0.00007852929,0.00019841694,0.000069259695,0.0000051579286,0.0000055652763,0.000015859501,0.000012100994,0.0012018832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916804,0.0004962808,0.00002441566,0.000107345746,0.00011804621,0.00008584777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955367,0.002463987,0.00090155675,0.000259791,0.0003124698,0.00052543305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093452615,0.00015602417,0.00022576674,0.00031645832,0.00078619353,0.003128185,0.00025122726,0.00050393445,0.0071134963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068474123,0.00016559893,0.0001917393,0.0003329923,0.00149231,0.0007270433,0.0008359836,0.00078790914,0.00043552238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023983903,0.0016727573,0.8554156,0.00028541734,0.00033513297,0.0010150325,0.05111826,0.00076726166,0.020036582,0.013930814,0.002908562,0.05011622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020512998,0.00017867348,0.98194975,0.00005224269,0.00009010497,0.00017683153,0.010463421,0.0005936494,0.00079603895,0.0028640518,0.0027874422,0.000027281954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032316705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057895924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071134963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006555176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031052937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023796976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148345188","doi":"10.1086/644763","title":"Will This Trip Really Be Exciting? The Role of Incidental Emotions in Product Evaluation","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Feeling; Valence (chemistry); Psychology; Product (mathematics); Social psychology; Negative emotion","score_opus":0.0974046892416851,"score_gpt":0.38034964994747333,"score_spread":0.28294496070578823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148345188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848727,0.00024574835,0.0022747417,0.00018190489,0.000025180547,0.00002259487,0.000009884796,0.00001275937,0.012354506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987896,0.00010303578,0.0007308502,0.00006518962,0.00001592305,0.000011231613,0.000009228147,0.0000079472975,0.00026690372],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851507,0.00076709385,0.00006463284,0.00013500529,0.00040748226,0.000110803296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98765755,0.008473063,0.0021819184,0.00060704583,0.00067853415,0.0004018641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002319163,0.0001771945,0.00016423776,0.00027848728,0.00048159805,0.0018080747,0.00019358825,0.00052013586,0.0014295058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020440197,0.00016044619,0.00024559698,0.00014251881,0.0011537188,0.001201224,0.00070585916,0.0008060118,0.0001440328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009153175,0.0027686018,0.38031706,0.001964304,0.0004946883,0.002020937,0.033805575,0.001850622,0.1674252,0.020116882,0.002003824,0.37807906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009671552,0.002264766,0.94868237,0.00024143179,0.00026403298,0.0011008239,0.010058752,0.003419519,0.0201961,0.009142531,0.0044241818,0.00010892711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021382353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037869386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002319163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027062697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019935849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012265027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2149752603","doi":"10.1086/599556","title":"Seeking Freedom through Variety","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":289,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.1329713267845702,"score_gpt":0.3812252165964943,"score_spread":0.2482538898119241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2149752603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9426145,0.00036528287,0.0077518495,0.00071379635,0.000016351058,0.000017803082,0.000035950394,0.000024590174,0.048459914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820435,0.00008800782,0.0005800407,0.000044019,0.000007748961,0.000006231812,0.000010284747,0.0000037033528,0.0010556655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992021,0.0003839135,0.000026915426,0.00011391911,0.00014552589,0.00012763593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780685,0.0007393656,0.0006001686,0.0003186377,0.0001382576,0.00039677386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085603405,0.00023632094,0.0001650003,0.00046156955,0.0009402807,0.0015324303,0.00023027345,0.00044108153,0.005122854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002895872,0.00013325397,0.00050852116,0.00033370292,0.0035967883,0.0016952342,0.002709919,0.00055871124,0.0002256544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019805012,0.0007223541,0.332794,0.00073141296,0.00046540986,0.0018105535,0.041257683,0.0070902538,0.065655604,0.37108174,0.0024105962,0.17399988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018765737,0.002369879,0.5941563,0.00036403665,0.00033654948,0.002079147,0.04099975,0.005909752,0.015375467,0.26514995,0.07281579,0.00025574333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010138608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019280307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005122854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005628563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029804683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017137587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151088719","doi":"10.1086/666595","title":"Taste Regimes and Market-Mediated Practice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Music History and Culture","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":399,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Taste; Psychology; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.11165422611664828,"score_gpt":0.3537715726210518,"score_spread":0.24211734650440353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151088719","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73117656,0.00079802214,0.025325071,0.0035291691,0.000046485977,0.000082179606,0.00002819872,0.0000819678,0.23893234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667156,0.0000865592,0.001437892,0.000056715933,0.000007337659,0.000020305924,0.0000036640795,0.000010124105,0.0017057551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99524766,0.0029682426,0.0001816049,0.0005237346,0.0007447107,0.0003340397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502075,0.0029717956,0.0006811596,0.0007782863,0.00024407072,0.00030379093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005303135,0.00025308106,0.00032135533,0.0019834295,0.0038942937,0.007172021,0.0008949025,0.0013769265,0.0041874903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007862299,0.00034280078,0.00030467924,0.0013874704,0.035444867,0.006460866,0.006181716,0.0013799887,0.000225009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008519761,0.0001496176,0.009048115,0.00021225339,0.000029878522,0.00059731095,0.33645833,0.0006077947,0.0049047456,0.6051063,0.00056302274,0.042237423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010652395,0.00030917727,0.022492608,0.0003975149,0.000033848704,0.00083534856,0.2834054,0.0026254167,0.0025211114,0.59275836,0.094409786,0.00010494909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013200131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017411222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007172021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032962458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00164586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028045952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158308799","doi":"10.1086/678907","title":"Things Fall Apart: The Dynamics of Brand Audience Dissipation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":194,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Semiotics; Perspective (graphical); Advertising; Value (mathematics); Identity (music); Sociology; Work (physics); Aesthetics; Business; Computer science; Epistemology; Art; Visual arts; Engineering","score_opus":0.06759384995983035,"score_gpt":0.3402537954299088,"score_spread":0.27265994547007844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158308799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8836891,0.0007553649,0.010112455,0.0041363277,0.00010460373,0.000038278016,0.00006740045,0.0001330752,0.100963436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957261,0.00012217842,0.0006898741,0.00015188857,0.000049128404,0.000012070646,0.000022140952,0.000040138984,0.0031864687],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981462,0.00070698233,0.00004837949,0.00030737263,0.00043471242,0.00035633784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525213,0.0023672143,0.0007342339,0.0005324054,0.00048557026,0.0006283539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003138444,0.00037850926,0.00048884423,0.0027219974,0.0049305614,0.008101589,0.0008714076,0.0017222211,0.012231639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014156786,0.0005156993,0.000561376,0.0011305856,0.007223799,0.011342517,0.0076209004,0.0023393298,0.00095067656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008074401,0.00032532265,0.084240824,0.00020831353,0.0000941971,0.002203913,0.45036644,0.0009152601,0.014565009,0.32860303,0.004980606,0.11268966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013407084,0.00059132377,0.22740258,0.00045758457,0.00014449564,0.002316763,0.3533316,0.009730345,0.0059146737,0.279889,0.11982743,0.0002601465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016624985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013311261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012231639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016788746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005545066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040918946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159177593","doi":"10.1086/593947","title":"Specification Seeking: How Product Specifications Influence Consumer Preference","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Booth University College","funders":"","keywords":"Spurious relationship; Preference; Product (mathematics); Test (biology); Advertising; Computer science; Marketing; Microeconomics; Economics; Business; Mathematics; Machine learning","score_opus":0.5768445415885378,"score_gpt":0.49502688211175927,"score_spread":0.08181765947677855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159177593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823919,0.0003718967,0.008114175,0.0004133082,0.0000071747945,0.00007033624,0.00006480401,0.000027600627,0.008538908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818856,0.00007905241,0.0013186489,0.0000920801,0.0000046187683,0.000017968514,0.000044836044,0.0000054554794,0.00024879535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644583,0.0022784497,0.00016496939,0.00033061896,0.00059596205,0.00018417886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96854746,0.023382206,0.0043315743,0.0017308006,0.0015792896,0.00042867826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061887684,0.0004149691,0.00032716047,0.00093855715,0.00043334885,0.0029542937,0.00053758576,0.0010756145,0.0032873438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030367551,0.00033452248,0.00066928414,0.0009106108,0.001202941,0.0019695912,0.00086558756,0.0007943727,0.00032173333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00153136,0.0009820679,0.8494136,0.00046879926,0.0006614781,0.00056780817,0.011874979,0.0070174723,0.010885973,0.016411064,0.0010936677,0.09909184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023499022,0.0021796569,0.9078156,0.00013591646,0.00063362194,0.00062477344,0.006670936,0.030856252,0.005822646,0.041741334,0.0030534957,0.00023077146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004944895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031618567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061887684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084268086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004783985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032729685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159585163","doi":"10.1086/504138","title":"How Nothing Became Something: White Space, Rhetoric, History, and Meaning","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":173,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Rhetoric; Meaning (existential); White (mutation); Space (punctuation); Sociology; Media studies; Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.11380084017821743,"score_gpt":0.3221266420646832,"score_spread":0.2083258018864658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159585163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18133505,0.015022233,0.048180092,0.038373377,0.0013242363,0.000073031675,0.00007627866,0.00008788307,0.7155277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867909,0.0016491243,0.003053784,0.0010974635,0.00028528392,0.00003977288,0.000018437637,0.00004967236,0.007015449],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958241,0.0030654278,0.000093622366,0.00029027107,0.00047019546,0.00025635838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882924,0.0093539925,0.00075256143,0.00071026833,0.00051579543,0.0003749775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006396926,0.00053626,0.0004559487,0.0029832644,0.006807454,0.0126829455,0.0010768202,0.002363506,0.004124599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012781202,0.00028706476,0.00038409155,0.0022649094,0.053190716,0.015761347,0.0045443834,0.0034631288,0.00035443215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013819907,0.000011582223,0.00034353358,0.00007001388,0.000003835381,0.000092850845,0.058975067,0.000084713,0.00019455368,0.93343616,0.0007123675,0.006061476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019999727,0.000067909925,0.000921235,0.0004798735,0.000020876743,0.00040387362,0.07927219,0.0007588912,0.0012586201,0.8270059,0.08975912,0.000031469026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002128803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024663378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0126829455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003356028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019551197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033830523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160426335","doi":"10.1086/513049","title":"Exploring the Cognitive Mechanism that Underlies Regulatory Focus Effects","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":204,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Mechanism (biology); Focus (optics); Psychology; Cognition; Elaboration; Promotion (chess); Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Neuroscience; Creativity","score_opus":0.4895691427661408,"score_gpt":0.5189199620702167,"score_spread":0.02935081930407596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160426335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829364,0.00015281675,0.008255466,0.0005500104,0.000012739339,0.00004953929,0.000016413263,0.000036404588,0.007990137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996608,0.00007147912,0.002854796,0.00013563849,0.0000106154075,0.000034937646,0.000016851278,0.0000093415765,0.00025844076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889624,0.0003913093,0.00004220381,0.0002379453,0.0003395445,0.00009284311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99344987,0.0043441043,0.0010538051,0.00061018305,0.00034191838,0.00020014508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031231483,0.00043679652,0.00026132882,0.00063949154,0.00041129978,0.0011605927,0.00042131898,0.00079960114,0.0025225852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012891818,0.00040149884,0.00034011254,0.00021200844,0.00128021,0.0013206853,0.0010610087,0.0013757318,0.00012386519],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029106222,0.0044385814,0.32018942,0.0007155638,0.0006137334,0.0013364495,0.078319736,0.0024571426,0.2837697,0.07369249,0.0013754196,0.23018116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005463274,0.0022794574,0.8886492,0.00017418778,0.0004320575,0.0011800806,0.0073236683,0.010176201,0.025141684,0.060129922,0.0038370916,0.00013022221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007627444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000671866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031231483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000404907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036500444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016516984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2166271967","doi":"10.1086/510223","title":"Few Ways to Love, but Many Ways to Hate: Attribute Ambiguity and the Positivity Effect in Agent Evaluation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Revelation; Psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.18055582997262065,"score_gpt":0.49549545664989186,"score_spread":0.3149396266772712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2166271967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9576175,0.00070137955,0.0060712546,0.0010394307,0.000044834876,0.00003133557,0.000027569487,0.000024559802,0.034442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829227,0.00010759424,0.0011002693,0.00013763757,0.00002382894,0.000009665795,0.00001039776,0.0000099814015,0.00030833547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955646,0.0023568987,0.00017695967,0.0003716374,0.0013828801,0.00014705099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9357989,0.047639392,0.008416428,0.0037111142,0.0026792283,0.0017548964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007585525,0.00032492244,0.0004267622,0.0007050507,0.0011949838,0.002582385,0.0003673098,0.0009746969,0.0043858876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05118755,0.00042688163,0.00044125988,0.00039591757,0.003359111,0.0046033408,0.002393881,0.0022301958,0.00026481439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067854626,0.0023079119,0.48315614,0.0010536526,0.0005977967,0.002241458,0.048590805,0.0034798768,0.06849204,0.12521431,0.0027431517,0.25533748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022978896,0.0012123223,0.8421881,0.00030646898,0.00027202963,0.0021033154,0.0089356825,0.007566414,0.006677764,0.12527624,0.004997971,0.00023395137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065632345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008433741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007585525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005734655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003902038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04011655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2175262206","doi":"10.1086/376802","title":"Speaking of Art as Embodied Imagination: A Multisensory Approach to Understanding Aesthetic Experience","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":577,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Unconscious mind; Psychology; Feeling; Cognitive science; Cognition; Taste; Aesthetics; Inference; Perspective (graphical); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Art; Visual arts","score_opus":0.3508731265676989,"score_gpt":0.49130313333013975,"score_spread":0.14043000676244083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2175262206","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2144626,0.042288963,0.4168268,0.019517882,0.00074711576,0.00011411978,0.00013610149,0.00026974038,0.30563664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96132076,0.005730498,0.02674144,0.0007258314,0.00018935149,0.000070600654,0.000027460492,0.00005102376,0.005143103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995511,0.00023048054,0.000023437176,0.00006112644,0.000076094126,0.00005762964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944824,0.00036973885,0.00006293523,0.00004809891,0.000032671014,0.000038392256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001017979,0.0004734439,0.00038961016,0.0022194593,0.0012124971,0.0076439786,0.00095439656,0.0018200489,0.003319429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016594415,0.00023190588,0.0006405822,0.0010580241,0.013136723,0.010562308,0.0029371225,0.0019671333,0.0002550052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035954425,0.000029389343,0.0014361794,0.00041772253,0.000033082393,0.00075530354,0.12239617,0.0015795948,0.0059776474,0.83693963,0.00083528616,0.029563999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013979571,0.000076058735,0.005331412,0.0004477313,0.000037007594,0.0014039194,0.06712941,0.004547918,0.0016539549,0.85966516,0.05963888,0.00005464551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097344175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010989368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076439786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000875077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052482315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011104643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177557676","doi":"10.1086/321952","title":"The Influence of Task Complexity on Consumer Choice: A Latent Class Model of Decision Strategy Switching","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":528,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Aggregate (composite); Latent class model; Selection (genetic algorithm); Affect (linguistics); Class (philosophy); Interpretation (philosophy); Consumer choice; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Communication","score_opus":0.3663133884224562,"score_gpt":0.3660250847546243,"score_spread":0.00028830366783189065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177557676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8813779,0.00018207043,0.10811301,0.0012604214,0.000031784744,0.00020462337,0.00021742881,0.000086800115,0.008525909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917841,0.00012034487,0.00635461,0.000059818696,0.000032979275,0.000117465526,0.00011153297,0.000021870723,0.0013973975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996804,0.0019116342,0.00010772244,0.00034838254,0.00036120368,0.000467005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97268224,0.021863455,0.0024243556,0.0014998735,0.00055533386,0.0009747589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072911307,0.000659526,0.0008358104,0.0009961245,0.000629269,0.0038150267,0.0010094811,0.0013687264,0.00405112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021628002,0.00036617374,0.0013037124,0.000979703,0.0022758641,0.0022190001,0.0016825836,0.0020449783,0.0005518713],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004176067,0.0038795443,0.24001105,0.00028421477,0.000864124,0.00069646206,0.014630052,0.24934901,0.0074344473,0.37605065,0.0037480195,0.09887629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001848801,0.0002885134,0.047997948,0.000023372517,0.00014690949,0.00012551606,0.0006132085,0.78231084,0.00033088826,0.16693804,0.00095321407,0.00008669884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045055817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036900174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072911307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015570045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087406405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038559616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177705074","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucv024","title":"Cross-Domain Effects of Guilt on Desire for Self-Improvement Products","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Research Canada; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Griffin; Scholarship; White (mutation); Consumer research; Sociology; Library science; Art history; Psychology; Art; Computer science; Marketing; Political science; Classics; Law","score_opus":0.22991565124664487,"score_gpt":0.5034278877987561,"score_spread":0.27351223655211127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177705074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959233,0.00011599786,0.0004492161,0.00006634607,0.00001058361,0.000024232339,0.00006252312,0.000008228771,0.0033396825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984627,0.00005879911,0.0004644659,0.000060531056,0.000008273563,0.000045961497,0.00012880671,0.0000114312115,0.00075903983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733526,0.0011958911,0.00013128539,0.00036861163,0.0007386385,0.00023025356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9643021,0.022373416,0.00667338,0.003160596,0.0017344736,0.0017560188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044649215,0.00041886573,0.00054095977,0.0007496165,0.00069853384,0.001651151,0.000495272,0.00088613876,0.0062109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027148822,0.0002448054,0.0008181862,0.00035602498,0.0013645478,0.0012428832,0.0025669595,0.0026336347,0.00046917167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013825917,0.009883167,0.8642198,0.00063767267,0.0018791782,0.00085051806,0.009636562,0.0032679057,0.02673584,0.0055559427,0.0012463499,0.062261097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056564455,0.0009783054,0.99273634,0.000042456188,0.00011294279,0.00017848148,0.0012234321,0.0011077978,0.0017596115,0.0011122004,0.0006580803,0.000033753025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011363821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010114411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008897947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003822132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023613036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181081857","doi":"10.1086/426621","title":"Gender Differences in Responses to Emotional Advertising: A Social Desirability Perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":216,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Social desirability; Psychology; Social psychology; Advertising; Art; Business","score_opus":0.24445410516638896,"score_gpt":0.41676565661070475,"score_spread":0.17231155144431579,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181081857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861894,0.00037307478,0.00070010027,0.00022923398,0.00003758419,0.00003221974,0.00007735751,0.000005147735,0.01235586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983298,0.00014125668,0.00024119187,0.000095575306,0.000035238438,0.000020312144,0.000032977918,0.000004527552,0.0010990626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995122,0.00023674709,0.000020433325,0.00007355727,0.00011167516,0.00004550927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947461,0.0032223111,0.0009816455,0.00028923768,0.00047589783,0.00028486594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013566583,0.00026742852,0.00021105987,0.00054738065,0.00020790966,0.0006700672,0.00015868492,0.00042546075,0.0044340724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070697414,0.00013398888,0.00018549935,0.00020583777,0.0005044852,0.00029874893,0.00031151055,0.00044006566,0.00028913192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062695146,0.0021404168,0.69842154,0.0005284309,0.0004761301,0.0014513084,0.020586405,0.0005498413,0.15572447,0.0066996934,0.0011065818,0.10604561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004259474,0.0010352527,0.98718643,0.000029935465,0.00006850506,0.0004244404,0.00280439,0.00038394064,0.0052943504,0.0014772589,0.0012342866,0.000018664197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00056092406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000645021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044340724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023266752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011296121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01483345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2190393757","doi":"10.1086/597158","title":"Sex in Advertising: Gender Differences and the Role of Relationship Commitment","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":209,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Salience (neuroscience); Psychology; Social psychology; Sexual attraction; Sexual behavior; Advertising; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.116658649416118,"score_gpt":0.3532573559692927,"score_spread":0.2365987065531747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2190393757","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97259337,0.0019397697,0.00040346634,0.00063262804,0.00004482472,0.000014045809,0.000030890777,0.000004414175,0.024336591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801946,0.00045462218,0.00009417911,0.000089246954,0.000020129311,0.0000039641313,0.000012403924,0.0000033711235,0.0013025841],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967194,0.0001611464,0.000013062439,0.00003954425,0.00008031018,0.00003393947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822336,0.0010344643,0.0003047155,0.00008832169,0.000105550476,0.00024357511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009794155,0.00016273609,0.00015204477,0.000502962,0.0004324785,0.0014675949,0.00017891807,0.00032787674,0.0058821924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037146679,0.00012328144,0.00012058316,0.00032087744,0.0010538097,0.0008507781,0.0005652048,0.0005250921,0.00029717688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028553978,0.0015684221,0.65790725,0.00043337847,0.00017936308,0.0015933057,0.052237254,0.00026525342,0.03189455,0.050496478,0.0012575228,0.19931187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004560805,0.0007529065,0.9604074,0.00014302631,0.00008343374,0.0011969075,0.0169335,0.00042883796,0.0024603184,0.008563936,0.008949794,0.000034396304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010091839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015723604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058821924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003023651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029500466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019677937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2199172276","doi":"10.1086/653947","title":"The Influence of Implicit Attitudes on Choice When Consumers Are Confronted with Conflicting Attribute Information","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.06662645901913877,"score_gpt":0.44813568413518023,"score_spread":0.38150922511604146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2199172276","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99838674,0.000022208647,0.00028480578,0.000028818262,0.0000040996933,0.0000050092012,0.00000383897,0.0000030306287,0.0012616353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993205,0.000032862947,0.0003226633,0.000026460066,0.0000049851446,0.0000067539117,0.000010469336,0.000004827977,0.00027050282],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887127,0.000535429,0.00005709978,0.00009918239,0.00035094752,0.00008602648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820937,0.0081072105,0.0016970542,0.0009226758,0.00046903663,0.0005946002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015621939,0.000247014,0.00023205274,0.00022592004,0.00031308766,0.0010917026,0.0001831976,0.00040586945,0.0020268355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013115315,0.0002256006,0.00017555465,0.00014333967,0.0007568218,0.00051208556,0.0005338419,0.0009135451,0.00017110756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011148103,0.0048899017,0.29256052,0.00041640596,0.00028259275,0.0008169637,0.009214129,0.0013030147,0.5776012,0.004911784,0.00033707754,0.09651838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034258995,0.0034189199,0.88733935,0.00006940749,0.00025615012,0.000578944,0.0019275548,0.0066577266,0.09185034,0.006306857,0.001160231,0.00009211104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006120224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060076965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020268355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019739513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022125452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00826174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2289035070","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucv009","title":"The<i>Journal of Consumer Research</i>at 40: A Historical Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":96,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.2266838268567308,"score_gpt":0.39483455308278065,"score_spread":0.16815072622604985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2289035070","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08398614,0.5442494,0.002144532,0.11809068,0.015941964,0.00015569683,0.003871799,0.00029611902,0.23126365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36904734,0.5183377,0.005837639,0.020625776,0.028164571,0.00019208687,0.0028933748,0.0006957997,0.054205686],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957575,0.0006703186,0.00047559274,0.0005030981,0.002234617,0.00035876967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775115,0.010287289,0.0030942438,0.0011006729,0.0056665167,0.002339664],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057258555,0.00038665143,0.0005084051,0.025033608,0.0046318015,0.010009444,0.00078728097,0.0016176376,0.011184009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014645573,0.00042361676,0.00046448282,0.027842527,0.005602553,0.006708815,0.0026211354,0.002465886,0.0025339434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021538464,0.00019303751,0.03989524,0.0049988516,0.00010329262,0.0013827309,0.027698835,0.00030114286,0.0026954797,0.16014972,0.3434839,0.41888237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023933003,0.000032972042,0.029871557,0.0019796316,0.000017248714,0.000557292,0.004215273,0.00006036231,0.00039933177,0.0027387717,0.96008927,0.00003599579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007311965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012746496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9749664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060470947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061846403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04387498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2308517848","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucw014","title":"The Recycled Self: Consumers’ Disposal Decisions of Identity-Linked Products","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":177,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Product (mathematics); Purchasing; Advertising; Marketing; Business; Consumer behaviour; Aesthetics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12368453667150278,"score_gpt":0.37450895186997085,"score_spread":0.2508244151984681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2308517848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99881727,0.000045561148,0.00011128379,0.000054790507,0.000001849624,0.0000044531853,0.0000072701496,0.0000011673847,0.00095623254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991326,0.0000547031,0.00021440102,0.00003577271,0.0000023597856,0.0000033856443,0.000022543092,0.0000015425459,0.00053275755],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935526,0.00031751592,0.000047075635,0.000079413054,0.00014728101,0.00005351989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955734,0.002062967,0.0014185463,0.00030251915,0.00038386736,0.00025872997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015252699,0.000152385,0.00022740908,0.00046658915,0.0005301403,0.001659015,0.00021348475,0.0008097296,0.002807554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007804615,0.00020336958,0.00041810318,0.00027874336,0.00067764905,0.0013223875,0.00069897773,0.00071410666,0.00024269195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022274721,0.0012540835,0.90266687,0.00017002996,0.00021995224,0.0005815343,0.03313508,0.00075065176,0.0060376762,0.0023011588,0.00041674805,0.050238684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004955363,0.0007006463,0.9508543,0.00007652228,0.00015750935,0.00032687528,0.036768407,0.0032449753,0.0028191933,0.0025739241,0.0023452456,0.00008278917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034986674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051008635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034986674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043583472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002802575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009392202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2311464513","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucv096","title":"Wealth and Welfare: Divergent Moral Reactions to Ethical Consumer Choices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Scrutiny; Perception; Government (linguistics); Social psychology; Moral responsibility; Welfare; Taxpayer; Public economics; Business ethics; Moral disengagement; Psychology; Economics; Political science; Public relations; Law","score_opus":0.4780865664451611,"score_gpt":0.5520323574295698,"score_spread":0.07394579098440868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2311464513","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994918,0.00004457541,0.00023551466,0.00018568146,0.0000052891232,0.0000052111523,0.0000065365916,0.0000013377232,0.004597817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996786,0.000026910444,0.000079060184,0.0000431796,0.0000030854312,0.0000036656552,0.0000062877766,0.0000010118491,0.00015828958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735403,0.0018035115,0.00007435477,0.00010734222,0.00049074343,0.00017001745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98833233,0.0066680205,0.002991977,0.0005349289,0.00076094054,0.0007117573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003233849,0.00021873829,0.00019084993,0.00070688175,0.0008017829,0.0020535823,0.00016231766,0.0006826668,0.0034481776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0155405635,0.00017262503,0.00027991086,0.00030196784,0.0025498243,0.0008590725,0.0016274815,0.0014551433,0.00017243931],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023772148,0.0013607836,0.82869536,0.00020859041,0.00031829148,0.0009069149,0.094284266,0.0012287016,0.011495473,0.016208807,0.0012006949,0.04171495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080548845,0.0004849593,0.8742095,0.00011463222,0.00009670102,0.0003957217,0.103504576,0.002364679,0.0022733933,0.013384871,0.0030039316,0.000086326014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010197617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014862522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034481776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006456591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002421788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01710242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336052666","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucw015","title":"All That Glitters Is Not Gold: How Others’ Status Influences the Effect of Power Distance Belief on Status Consumption","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Power (physics); Social psychology; Power consumption; Marketing; Business; Sociology; Social science; Physics","score_opus":0.10608769317321882,"score_gpt":0.44500445144149536,"score_spread":0.33891675826827655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336052666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98912805,0.0001051446,0.00058438495,0.00046473986,0.000010244827,0.0000073282563,0.00002118504,0.000004819004,0.009674106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990025,0.00003757838,0.00014074508,0.000056042372,0.0000035769606,0.0000025115128,0.000011058849,0.0000032186153,0.00074272865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929416,0.00034874963,0.000026730646,0.00008848021,0.00015407885,0.00008787005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945004,0.0029509163,0.0012233424,0.0004923779,0.0003114024,0.0005215153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013836451,0.00021529317,0.00021414018,0.0003839032,0.0007382347,0.0018356827,0.0002247202,0.0005563807,0.0072766705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066460436,0.00017176813,0.00026743233,0.0002667598,0.0016110544,0.0012675595,0.00095138873,0.00087398244,0.00035880433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016135005,0.0009934565,0.86307704,0.00020179001,0.00049207814,0.0005693462,0.035477925,0.00073913793,0.010909461,0.02315995,0.0012900374,0.061476342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007511935,0.0005196619,0.95433134,0.0001251319,0.00023678155,0.00018730534,0.020717697,0.0021040626,0.0014705607,0.014577085,0.0056053572,0.00004993625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004615838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051553734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072766705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042998983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039526986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024342954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493140117","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucw036","title":"Coping and Construal Level Matching Drives Health Message Effectiveness via Response Efficacy or Self-Efficacy Enhancement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Coping (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology; Avoidance coping; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.2106584140447337,"score_gpt":0.5235217103405726,"score_spread":0.31286329629583887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493140117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981553,0.000024890678,0.00041817885,0.000051454466,0.000008810615,0.00004575827,0.000014575317,0.0000065205245,0.0012744386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987532,0.000018601871,0.000764437,0.00004942639,0.000008170914,0.00008978029,0.000020733569,0.00000426438,0.0002913343],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987118,0.00065135414,0.00010603911,0.00021527699,0.0001520749,0.00016346278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98298013,0.012290555,0.0025881703,0.0011646684,0.00022345896,0.00075301446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028790748,0.0003241749,0.00032715328,0.0002479635,0.00031585278,0.0013365402,0.00028603507,0.0009104364,0.005121131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014318188,0.00033151777,0.0003345451,0.00013260421,0.00078663306,0.0007957633,0.00078464166,0.0011362241,0.00032157445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03510592,0.060385942,0.3599636,0.001285799,0.00089370226,0.00043183108,0.009512637,0.004030957,0.4111841,0.01085443,0.0008053921,0.10554571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017666466,0.03077018,0.88621974,0.00010700701,0.0006699838,0.00018656036,0.0021120985,0.00912605,0.05829425,0.009307541,0.0013195475,0.00012041233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002077975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020411826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005121131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002935964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026050143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017131925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525632017","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucw056","title":"The Dark Side of Scarcity Promotions: How Exposure to Limited-Quantity Promotions Can Induce Aggression","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Scarcity; Aggression; Promotion (chess); Product (mathematics); Advertising; Business; Marketing; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.2917492885837092,"score_gpt":0.3992030759868629,"score_spread":0.1074537874031537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525632017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963612,0.00012408679,0.00041120028,0.00011720022,0.000019158173,0.000016407212,0.000014478943,0.000006642422,0.0029295515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984603,0.000107328146,0.00043226458,0.00009971545,0.000015814183,0.000024948937,0.000021912894,0.000006471875,0.00083123957],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995041,0.00022908761,0.000021363998,0.0000983025,0.000099020224,0.00004820028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988727,0.0004963786,0.00022519343,0.00018544233,0.000050682655,0.00016955717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050904125,0.00018169993,0.00021512985,0.00021660683,0.00039335014,0.0006928988,0.00017552385,0.00046189016,0.0029913522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001941282,0.00022561611,0.00020531069,0.00008584113,0.00075495976,0.0003849989,0.00066844426,0.0008408609,0.00021924483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055344384,0.005495154,0.0553068,0.0005020454,0.00013963257,0.0010497661,0.005241645,0.0003493975,0.8792906,0.0046421643,0.0010629147,0.04138546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029297455,0.014228655,0.831218,0.00025720833,0.00025991802,0.0018616754,0.0041569197,0.0021677183,0.12970257,0.009765511,0.005995911,0.000092994815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005962586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009486172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029913522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023026027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026006912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010007083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2555493865","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucw069","title":"Souvenirs to Forget","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Visual Culture and Art Theory","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Forgetting; Memory work; Semiotics; Ethnography; World trade center; Aesthetics; Sociology; Psychology; Terrorism; History; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Art; Anthropology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.17498810140274615,"score_gpt":0.40150299189293426,"score_spread":0.2265148904901881,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2555493865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9148417,0.0035149937,0.004807378,0.0034147368,0.00028555188,0.000026962962,0.000057254998,0.000087751025,0.07296373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98520064,0.00074129726,0.0011399935,0.0002943131,0.000053139876,0.000008005563,0.000021799162,0.000028169401,0.012512733],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879444,0.0005759406,0.00006765564,0.00017649995,0.0002670415,0.00011839423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555945,0.0018758134,0.0009650004,0.0008441663,0.00050304725,0.00025244558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018411723,0.00037889517,0.00024530748,0.0010003434,0.003345801,0.0039290795,0.0006804052,0.000766226,0.009115644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076450887,0.00023147445,0.0003716146,0.0006007519,0.0080027515,0.004405851,0.0029408366,0.001437552,0.0007074114],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027653092,0.00015093412,0.045738336,0.0005279231,0.00010612313,0.0018401662,0.73535657,0.00021133121,0.0060576345,0.055939086,0.008420783,0.14537457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030016012,0.00037170932,0.04088152,0.0009744564,0.00013803388,0.0032810916,0.56083935,0.00053575326,0.0062535955,0.023968363,0.36260659,0.0001195133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005815059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009502039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009115644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014386203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007897877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030494869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2559939101","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucw067","title":"Experiential Gifts Foster Stronger Social Relationships Than Material Gifts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Gift giving; Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Function (biology); Interpersonal relationship; Donation; Pedagogy; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.1694211438175812,"score_gpt":0.49256243685991835,"score_spread":0.3231412930423372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2559939101","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846117,0.00016320209,0.0011353453,0.00022261772,0.000034470744,0.000026463184,0.000024210469,0.000031897012,0.013750166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979791,0.00007640569,0.0007430906,0.00004831943,0.000008942672,0.00001493665,0.000016443717,0.000006000192,0.0011069388],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892646,0.00059946696,0.00006124825,0.00009443944,0.00022181812,0.000096605276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943625,0.0016242577,0.0013100995,0.00082765,0.00024789938,0.0016276248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018561258,0.00021484819,0.00019937808,0.0004256634,0.0006922504,0.00091798673,0.00023299029,0.00039126497,0.014934439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006488091,0.00014659921,0.00019584138,0.00021920323,0.0009799663,0.0006957408,0.0019697554,0.0008232398,0.000570307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058686184,0.020235209,0.27302828,0.0019390633,0.0006925458,0.0019205955,0.024203746,0.002088044,0.20879745,0.07375412,0.0069102976,0.38056207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006487903,0.009092223,0.8750463,0.00041984595,0.00029761627,0.0026388988,0.013679835,0.003460629,0.019972648,0.035650708,0.03899385,0.00009860293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020233325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004038265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014934439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003340607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026852227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049960732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581159468","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucw084","title":"Power Distance Belief, Power, and Charitable Giving","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Protein Data Bank (RCSB PDB); Social psychology; Psychology; Boundary (topology); Relation (database); Inequality; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Data mining","score_opus":0.10826930563049422,"score_gpt":0.48508721852039993,"score_spread":0.37681791288990574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581159468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98763716,0.0007397542,0.0006683005,0.0004981346,0.000020229647,0.000020975069,0.000037737842,0.0000033607284,0.010374311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912065,0.00022693805,0.00019906183,0.000051937895,0.000010164229,0.0000142737845,0.000021204687,0.0000010697022,0.000354805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871624,0.0005508041,0.000091691916,0.00012774674,0.00032560385,0.00018793426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94834775,0.03414408,0.011306081,0.0015701829,0.0019413054,0.0026905874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038589654,0.00031818665,0.0003415354,0.0013715684,0.0010557018,0.0027728083,0.0005592723,0.0009603996,0.0050305086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02880841,0.00022811093,0.00041136588,0.001729002,0.0022324412,0.0013459977,0.0018573216,0.0017395373,0.00020228425],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036774034,0.0018970774,0.93994105,0.0003049835,0.00037110486,0.0001328669,0.006002215,0.0007289232,0.0004382996,0.011760141,0.00039432128,0.037661333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071245944,0.00055961736,0.9769703,0.00017509119,0.0002030559,0.00018031373,0.007588918,0.0012285457,0.0005841157,0.010795042,0.0016092152,0.000034520304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026781363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039028411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050305086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011292805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066192163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020408392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612491650","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucx062","title":"Social-Recognition versus Financial Incentives? Exploring the Effects of Creativity-Contingent External Rewards on Creative Performance","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Normative; Incentive; Originality; Contingency; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.32409126289385776,"score_gpt":0.49692449723782867,"score_spread":0.1728332343439709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612491650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992778,0.0000888488,0.001307179,0.00011706843,0.000017136877,0.00003191573,0.000022330587,0.000008645756,0.0056287437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99866426,0.000036489586,0.0008657471,0.000026439564,0.0000079091105,0.000040895993,0.0000086899045,0.000006503065,0.00034312584],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828327,0.0009593448,0.00007728699,0.0001973342,0.00032512267,0.00015771779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727581,0.020378292,0.0039398894,0.0008733049,0.0006038275,0.0014465459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002787196,0.00042691175,0.0004082369,0.00031490717,0.00046270722,0.0020035258,0.0005435212,0.00058198627,0.007042056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022216482,0.00019845423,0.0003186423,0.00024864107,0.0012419778,0.0010659395,0.0017648343,0.0010736325,0.00025186737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.063087866,0.02991931,0.21559295,0.0034066432,0.0009063633,0.0014628333,0.008529848,0.016153354,0.28098157,0.06697556,0.0011271272,0.31185663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001961682,0.017363533,0.86973995,0.00040648857,0.00074151286,0.00055573677,0.0038269355,0.019305998,0.045095697,0.03649522,0.0042911195,0.00021611054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040374298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051504694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007042056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000669235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006948327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02355802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623390613","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucx072","title":"Standards of Beauty: The Impact of Mannequins in the Retail Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Innovation Council; University of British Columbia; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Beauty; Context (archaeology); Product (mathematics); Psychology; Self-esteem; Mediation; Social psychology; Advertising; Aesthetics; Business; Art; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.21239591506999103,"score_gpt":0.4559712463543495,"score_spread":0.24357533128435846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623390613","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918853,0.00012001398,0.00012844385,0.00014598925,0.00000672943,0.000005486982,0.000006455055,0.0000022215909,0.0076993215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995492,0.000032778436,0.00006798394,0.000026187932,0.0000031858951,0.0000015713583,0.0000029005248,0.0000013323081,0.0003148049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982601,0.001072998,0.00005112635,0.00012681511,0.00036708015,0.00012187156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99267733,0.0037264966,0.0019944473,0.00041867988,0.00060987927,0.0005731365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023285323,0.00020265242,0.00019913547,0.00052675314,0.0010648993,0.0023410155,0.00030494484,0.00045666727,0.0063073584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076739094,0.00013016183,0.00022880186,0.00029151177,0.0018280499,0.0011103097,0.0017789071,0.0007299933,0.00015500587],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016558296,0.001368778,0.83431053,0.00038448832,0.000245443,0.0011651195,0.04501361,0.00042975394,0.012700524,0.013691709,0.0008850807,0.08814915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025057247,0.000556311,0.9516698,0.00010782472,0.00009535647,0.0005053939,0.03744267,0.0005579384,0.0023943838,0.0026085821,0.0039953347,0.000041377356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021964023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004458193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063073584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065753335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048586162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021100223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750061478","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucx090","title":"Facing Dominance: Anthropomorphism and the Effect of Product Face Ratio on Consumer Preference","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Premise; Psychology; Dominance (genetics); Product (mathematics); Preference; Social psychology; Face (sociological concept); Perception; Context (archaeology); Advertising; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Business; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Sociology","score_opus":0.14838789750977327,"score_gpt":0.466171920158796,"score_spread":0.3177840226490227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750061478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99657035,0.000044356722,0.00020164702,0.000021343543,0.0000044364183,0.000010837735,0.000027222944,0.0000040707955,0.003115678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992157,0.000023868617,0.00023298153,0.000021411428,0.000004268732,0.000007723545,0.000030363331,0.000004467232,0.00045916485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999358,0.00031606844,0.000031936546,0.00009447717,0.00015792644,0.000041556817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910125,0.005966273,0.0016297814,0.00042599684,0.00036535514,0.0005999085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012146287,0.0002579993,0.00020087582,0.00041497682,0.00024654952,0.0012092411,0.00019302536,0.0004410027,0.01013942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007454791,0.00014522015,0.0003188684,0.00022469898,0.0004219474,0.0005068125,0.00048768832,0.00056686136,0.0004087398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007387018,0.0029744622,0.8849607,0.0002363415,0.0004066172,0.00071711926,0.0029760685,0.0009537834,0.05862904,0.0011579955,0.00080128637,0.03879969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025417992,0.00063840067,0.99575484,0.00000989544,0.000049070215,0.00015313027,0.0007048568,0.0009832856,0.0011738229,0.00026995878,0.00022323584,0.000014098675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009429825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011034538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01013942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023880728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011652644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033919692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753691469","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucx096","title":"Asking Questions with Reflexive Focus: A Tutorial on Designing and Conducting Interviews","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":206,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Focus (optics); Key (lock); Consumer research; Consumption (sociology); Empirical research; Focus group; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Marketing; Epistemology; Social science; Business","score_opus":0.3623472518778457,"score_gpt":0.44460685117260806,"score_spread":0.08225959929476234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753691469","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010815936,0.0063654077,0.8700989,0.012547538,0.0019661393,0.039019823,0.0018339388,0.0024528175,0.054899476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022287171,0.0065245517,0.8673644,0.003270024,0.00043124423,0.080218084,0.0008386731,0.00095009105,0.018115802],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9554329,0.03905107,0.0017071295,0.001244787,0.0017074902,0.0008566065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93432665,0.05645108,0.0018031534,0.0027828394,0.0037192097,0.0009171165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04987182,0.0038753818,0.0016575301,0.0037915658,0.0049895155,0.0043476466,0.003385585,0.0033067917,0.020929735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06499019,0.0025550178,0.001214811,0.0033223126,0.006394065,0.0063603725,0.0065474263,0.0056966194,0.014413503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032986113,0.00046242005,0.00068816886,0.007927479,0.00004869597,0.0018372,0.3933718,0.0016277684,0.024914678,0.07926997,0.08993687,0.3995851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012464417,0.00032751806,0.0010042225,0.0069159972,0.000026372794,0.0012671605,0.083824486,0.0010612977,0.0057779844,0.06482218,0.8346457,0.00020247573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018717606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037796106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04987182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027195157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006048359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26375055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755130001","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucx100","title":"Creating a Consumable Past: How Memory Making Shapes Marketization","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Marketization; Hegemony; Capitalism; Redress; Socialism; Consumption (sociology); State socialism; Political economy; Sociology; Economic system; Acquiescence; Politics; Communism; Economics; Market economy; Political science; Social science; China; Law","score_opus":0.15965909019833013,"score_gpt":0.4677260116441189,"score_spread":0.3080669214457888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755130001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9234471,0.00034665657,0.0030782078,0.0010965335,0.00002741935,0.000013527958,0.000036007084,0.000026030675,0.07192851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850696,0.000079875055,0.00034160525,0.000029876772,0.0000041688886,0.000002881199,0.000011188564,0.000008389698,0.0010149465],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993599,0.00031765673,0.000016719974,0.0000891836,0.00011268714,0.00010393778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663025,0.0015713996,0.0007180816,0.0004431725,0.00028209705,0.00035509834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00150999,0.00013932139,0.00014788697,0.00073557603,0.0018107702,0.005332734,0.0005678586,0.0005962697,0.008463135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007681084,0.00017709163,0.00016572245,0.0006136713,0.005333809,0.0035397962,0.0022180248,0.00095338095,0.00035258767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090677995,0.0005599444,0.09628351,0.00035559406,0.000098426186,0.0011707867,0.37480634,0.0014582485,0.014684552,0.35703897,0.0041726623,0.14846416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010855124,0.0006891292,0.2400684,0.0005326633,0.00018568254,0.001211772,0.34474087,0.0051919306,0.009825848,0.27889857,0.11836644,0.0001801957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018360364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002547807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008463135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012360093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007109359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028312027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758641126","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucx101","title":"When Public Recognition for Charitable Giving Backfires: The Role of Independent Self-Construal","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Self construal; Donation; Interdependence; Construal level theory; Social psychology; Psychology; Public good; Political science; Economics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.33507867697986854,"score_gpt":0.4669789675696979,"score_spread":0.13190029058982938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758641126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97052985,0.00029721326,0.0026534868,0.0014887884,0.00008359056,0.000026829848,0.000012222893,0.000021818298,0.024886105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99911433,0.000050205665,0.00035147392,0.00013423142,0.00001126868,0.000008524561,0.0000073955325,0.0000056595245,0.00031676047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078745,0.0064925323,0.00025632294,0.00040765168,0.001468692,0.00058740005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93429023,0.03344963,0.017788773,0.004915631,0.004360065,0.0051957006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013933491,0.0002131518,0.00042626637,0.0008031823,0.0015672962,0.004650629,0.0005864207,0.0013529325,0.0038668038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054309465,0.0003088812,0.00047050472,0.00045103987,0.0029407917,0.0016055836,0.0024521553,0.0033984468,0.0002891636],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020197157,0.0042496417,0.64934444,0.0008153085,0.0006753964,0.00085455005,0.055747785,0.0030865378,0.012869064,0.0893035,0.0061162836,0.1749178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014040347,0.0010836051,0.8494085,0.00073101016,0.00031024485,0.000582396,0.059044857,0.0074455882,0.0053831497,0.06300745,0.012633212,0.0002295118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016554468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002312239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013933491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015048662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016954335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07368827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762657208","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucx106","title":"When Two Wrongs Make a Right: Using Conjunctive Enablers to Enhance Evaluations for Extremely Incongruent New Products","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Color perception and design","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Alberta; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Enabling; Feature (linguistics); Product (mathematics); Association (psychology); Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.3704997811560194,"score_gpt":0.56814132711706,"score_spread":0.1976415459610406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762657208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821783,0.00014813483,0.0063791773,0.0003802192,0.00009213757,0.00018563074,0.000021812517,0.00021619533,0.0103984475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800348,0.0001060407,0.01798991,0.00031265576,0.000028788245,0.00014345103,0.000024504277,0.000047593923,0.0013122914],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982469,0.0007180347,0.00013073217,0.00022237314,0.0005679088,0.00011403836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98475915,0.01158944,0.0016424519,0.0010531599,0.00045611133,0.0004997619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037573178,0.0004860524,0.00036678303,0.00040711765,0.0003624703,0.0014047975,0.0005901044,0.0009638527,0.0073127504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022509847,0.00029036397,0.00038771093,0.00020037328,0.0008406302,0.0018544067,0.0014361973,0.0011206506,0.0006279698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019929118,0.020258406,0.037498217,0.0037100092,0.0006356618,0.0017633218,0.017056184,0.00471765,0.44708604,0.028914172,0.005279105,0.41315213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00923612,0.053749636,0.4337826,0.002381116,0.004425742,0.0020457106,0.01264322,0.066587105,0.2619063,0.10346384,0.048799563,0.0009790289],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027225894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004189816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073127504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035124703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032267882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024463594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788125042","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucx061","title":"Retracted: Witnessing Moral Violations Increases Conformity in Consumption","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Conformity; Cheating; Consumption (sociology); Conformist; Social psychology; Psychology; Moral disengagement; Overconsumption; Moral standards; Order (exchange); Affect (linguistics); Product (mathematics); Economics; Sociology; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Production (economics)","score_opus":0.5178665204848348,"score_gpt":0.4716735940572083,"score_spread":0.04619292642762651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788125042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998494,0.000044207947,0.00017059577,0.0000974315,0.000015313466,0.0000056961276,0.000013807081,0.000009899636,0.0011490346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900764,0.000054416763,0.00032456554,0.0000946258,0.000010579486,0.000010711485,0.00002909205,0.0000069569937,0.00046141702],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923706,0.00032656593,0.00004423021,0.00014815415,0.00016695762,0.00007705916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936771,0.0024330278,0.0020974153,0.0008259058,0.00026382008,0.0007027899],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008194888,0.00022777038,0.0003025814,0.00020433773,0.00034887754,0.0010826653,0.00026724982,0.0006901293,0.0072150356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009309973,0.0002613378,0.0001992344,0.000111405185,0.00064998807,0.00050370296,0.0009914148,0.0017668658,0.00032218298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015580851,0.020809375,0.43237594,0.00088910415,0.0007340145,0.0018809022,0.012632905,0.0012168727,0.36609045,0.0039717094,0.0036490483,0.1401688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014053051,0.005827681,0.96386933,0.00010672305,0.00017796346,0.00054707454,0.0028612968,0.0018075951,0.019174295,0.003431062,0.0020038837,0.000052567433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006582701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011014716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024696594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021969683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024136662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791881514","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucy019","title":"Beyond Acculturation: Multiculturalism and the Institutional Shaping of an Ethnic Consumer Subject","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Acculturation; Commodification; Ethnic group; Multiculturalism; Scholarship; Sociology; Immigration; Consumption (sociology); Gender studies; Political science; Social science; Economics; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.19512422872088248,"score_gpt":0.45109434240159707,"score_spread":0.2559701136807146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791881514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9220014,0.0006411601,0.0012999816,0.003813612,0.000029188894,0.000016802214,0.000012640774,0.000007939598,0.0721771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987143,0.00012817643,0.00020715715,0.00010477629,0.000006588616,0.0000022495747,0.0000019784045,0.0000024626527,0.0008323737],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869245,0.000749948,0.000032142903,0.00010386549,0.00018182915,0.00023977955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978283,0.0008191348,0.0003725764,0.00024536144,0.0003805988,0.00035404527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033300552,0.00015749152,0.00013983848,0.0009592445,0.006621892,0.0063032233,0.0006607472,0.00057229534,0.002285385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003076996,0.00011041275,0.00013458855,0.0009674652,0.02465717,0.0020048001,0.0033681872,0.0010056348,0.000070460315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045975703,0.00004484998,0.047219254,0.00006971721,0.000013466125,0.000879036,0.670597,0.000110474306,0.0014891995,0.25753608,0.00065523287,0.021339709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008875163,0.000049677183,0.07822613,0.000303126,0.000028872671,0.0006118564,0.8261647,0.0005266716,0.0011707664,0.038567893,0.05429976,0.00004162092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11501154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22990827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11501154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058465423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076698987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22868419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797614651","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucy035","title":"Brands as Rivals: Consumer Pursuit of Distinctiveness and the Role of Brand Anthropomorphism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":185,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Lehigh University","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Advertising; Agency (philosophy); Psychology; Brand extension; Brand management; Business; Marketing; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05208866576381417,"score_gpt":0.35441852908040045,"score_spread":0.3023298633165863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797614651","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890266,0.000052752446,0.00049030775,0.00011551008,0.0000031241932,0.0000066643543,0.0000026049397,0.0000026419323,0.0102998195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996,0.000015651469,0.00015953889,0.000016093843,0.000001811948,0.0000012083259,0.0000019776337,8.986241e-7,0.00020287496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992219,0.00039860513,0.000030029041,0.00008847516,0.00020588245,0.000055103486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947412,0.0023463645,0.0016846878,0.00044853447,0.0003044058,0.0004747973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013074484,0.00015895798,0.00015028541,0.0004437541,0.0006586823,0.0024914192,0.00021547246,0.000596656,0.003909825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062626665,0.00016443864,0.00022715508,0.00024408988,0.0016310107,0.0016203083,0.0014070134,0.0006432594,0.000119200195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019590748,0.0013124795,0.7677411,0.00029524157,0.00029354132,0.0012765778,0.040897686,0.0010633447,0.030320976,0.06147444,0.0006995713,0.09266604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006271243,0.00078797876,0.9307538,0.000091429494,0.00019504142,0.0010807969,0.036425855,0.004178477,0.003562298,0.01675625,0.0060301996,0.00007520233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080931117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012396147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003909825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044285716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002813986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013079643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809594880","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucy056","title":"Bidding Frenzy: Speed of Competitor Reaction and Willingness to Pay in Auctions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Common value auction; Willingness to pay; Microeconomics; Product (mathematics); Economics; Perception; Vickrey–Clarke–Groves auction; Auction theory; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17462786958134152,"score_gpt":0.49564941191366824,"score_spread":0.3210215423323267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809594880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99260944,0.00013098119,0.0019083195,0.00004435216,0.000007496549,0.000026135052,0.00001571234,0.000011351298,0.0052462304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983175,0.000058116435,0.0009785092,0.00003345641,0.000011939015,0.000020068015,0.000030403027,0.000013839162,0.00053630513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984548,0.0007696091,0.00012168035,0.00022621785,0.00034568232,0.000082094615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9488351,0.033706944,0.012076026,0.0026719838,0.0015279095,0.001182093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004066658,0.0003262933,0.00037732557,0.001029188,0.00027668235,0.0014774778,0.00034876182,0.00077429786,0.0037842458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034842312,0.00036967383,0.00043435115,0.00048477302,0.00079487433,0.0016942517,0.00057365734,0.0012016274,0.00039743545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006535254,0.0018096622,0.84910613,0.0002531855,0.0006696159,0.00047354857,0.0038505176,0.008348559,0.0543169,0.011948886,0.00060645666,0.062081326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010425155,0.0011035375,0.9807146,0.00002136963,0.00011250875,0.0004947592,0.00061928673,0.007085817,0.002722307,0.0059944927,0.00093243865,0.00009455539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008590516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071503856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004066658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005513902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020574083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021506786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903731039","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucy082","title":"Wine for the Table: Self-Construal, Group Size, and Choice for Self and Others","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Self construal; Social psychology; Wine; Psychology; Interdependence; Moderated mediation; Group (periodic table); Mediation","score_opus":0.0770332969018656,"score_gpt":0.3644624334724252,"score_spread":0.2874291365705596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903731039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99639076,0.00012321041,0.00034331132,0.00013761484,0.000004347757,0.0000065585473,0.000011824653,0.0000013991119,0.0029808637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996246,0.000040605486,0.00014908501,0.000023373184,0.0000027573783,0.0000029508442,0.000012633213,0.0000010997766,0.00014286522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99703974,0.0020123194,0.000104592924,0.00023015065,0.00048159892,0.00013153318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730323,0.016959619,0.005564681,0.001954334,0.0011051506,0.0013838565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063265264,0.00018364689,0.00030993132,0.00075395935,0.000734344,0.0027070013,0.00037863484,0.00055713294,0.00286059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016662993,0.00018558302,0.00040043867,0.0006486032,0.0018878629,0.0015607807,0.0012110596,0.00083059334,0.00012943926],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077549426,0.00073448406,0.9413707,0.00014026447,0.00044044363,0.00018886225,0.019211672,0.0008097546,0.00228032,0.008061919,0.00034753256,0.025638593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047450885,0.000275173,0.9635,0.00007240436,0.00014574575,0.00013240355,0.02169292,0.0020406872,0.0009116041,0.009366442,0.0017677883,0.000047368598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021845698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004190774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063265264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005405397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035896737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033458292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904771591","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucy081","title":"The Body as (Another) Place: Producing Embodied Heterotopias Through Tattooing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Tattoo and Body Piercing Complications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":85,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Conceptualization; Phenomenology (philosophy); Aesthetics; Existentialism; Sociology; Heterotopia (medicine); Epistemology; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14874457001660313,"score_gpt":0.4778857592115819,"score_spread":0.32914118919497876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904771591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93198514,0.0005108729,0.015011454,0.0017052272,0.00009912417,0.00004802987,0.000027118791,0.000062037536,0.050551087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946813,0.00008595032,0.0011847465,0.00008374688,0.000007050907,0.000010473349,0.0000052421283,0.000023653432,0.00391783],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898785,0.0005917753,0.000024644141,0.00009286403,0.00016501998,0.0001378168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882513,0.00062188576,0.00013907056,0.00023061094,0.000083396466,0.00009998218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016409969,0.00028605878,0.00028620855,0.00083867763,0.004208244,0.0039861565,0.00049650995,0.001004027,0.004485641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029437656,0.00019819365,0.0003532077,0.00069887313,0.018896159,0.00352056,0.0060307635,0.0015021318,0.0002966164],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009589027,0.00003697735,0.0038497327,0.00018649577,0.000018249164,0.0018640572,0.824755,0.00034079215,0.005764491,0.14788088,0.0010825933,0.014124805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021260419,0.0001792026,0.008819893,0.00039935677,0.000053792683,0.0031546038,0.8111261,0.0013441017,0.0049332613,0.04584565,0.12404309,0.000079544494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014271683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018967143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004485641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094442954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079972495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015005946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911224100","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucz003","title":"The Best Laid Plans: Why New Parents Fail to Habituate Practices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Marketing Science Institute","keywords":"Habituation; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Abandonment (legal); Plan (archaeology); Work (physics); Best practice; Psychology; Process (computing); Public relations; Social psychology; Marketing; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Management; Political science; Economics; History","score_opus":0.14836871173593139,"score_gpt":0.46401374850143196,"score_spread":0.3156450367655006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911224100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9843509,0.00036337247,0.0038585006,0.0036864956,0.000055487926,0.000054572418,0.000041814525,0.00007078304,0.0075181485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958326,0.00027690703,0.0016970014,0.00043114938,0.0000063522075,0.000042556934,0.00004010494,0.000025356325,0.0016478597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554116,0.0020577172,0.00021673765,0.0005237446,0.0012438857,0.00041675844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818255,0.008090988,0.0029073118,0.003112789,0.002508689,0.0015546775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008802372,0.00021907434,0.00025779053,0.0005483752,0.0023309605,0.0036030002,0.001321734,0.0013080786,0.004552547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036004484,0.00068986596,0.00032634428,0.00040241904,0.003862512,0.0035352395,0.00297307,0.002776484,0.0005083062],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020161708,0.00041413525,0.3248594,0.00023827508,0.000072325725,0.0031569423,0.50100344,0.00045232367,0.0030760677,0.011898435,0.0058624027,0.14876463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040129726,0.00057325134,0.29146692,0.0008183018,0.00010249869,0.003090242,0.61239576,0.003556138,0.003904702,0.017034702,0.0668448,0.00017259456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01819619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02269568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01819619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028857396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041334145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046551943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912209887","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucz004","title":"Consumer Movements and Value Regimes: Fighting Food Waste in Germany by Building Alternative Object Pathways","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Object (grammar); Marketing; Corporate governance; Business; Construct (python library); Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04579327444343924,"score_gpt":0.3154321753793883,"score_spread":0.26963890093594906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912209887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95965344,0.00021167824,0.0035783441,0.001353834,0.000015469152,0.000033966364,0.000024873843,0.000019485367,0.03510892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975434,0.00006681635,0.0007697897,0.000052268195,0.0000021234655,0.000010048009,0.0000120609,0.0000057846155,0.0015376006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983094,0.0009454015,0.00004600272,0.00016754189,0.00021131222,0.00032024801],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988819,0.0005732294,0.00021791442,0.00012417515,0.00007146648,0.00013137228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024140691,0.00022968445,0.0001520384,0.0013783848,0.002634355,0.0037116886,0.00053509383,0.0010718441,0.0033072378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017678881,0.0001719766,0.00021740799,0.0012822701,0.009843175,0.0030035663,0.0047283624,0.00084016577,0.00023535966],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041587104,0.00034809118,0.06886105,0.00032715645,0.000050333143,0.0019463066,0.22515002,0.0022275997,0.006786763,0.57538813,0.0030301944,0.115468465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010452131,0.0006302293,0.10074815,0.00057631306,0.00008091783,0.00084806624,0.4211179,0.0075140423,0.01047075,0.18765436,0.27011663,0.00013807263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004291257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008311984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004630494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004630494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016488809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033596694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918125203","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucz006","title":"How Well Do Consumer-Brand Relationships Drive Customer Brand Loyalty? Generalizations from a Meta-Analysis of Brand Relationship Elasticities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":230,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Brand loyalty; Brand management; Marketing; Business; Brand equity; Brand relationship; Advertising; Brand extension; Brand awareness; Loyalty; Loyalty business model; Service (business); Service quality","score_opus":0.2225358535334811,"score_gpt":0.3496369297650828,"score_spread":0.12710107623160172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918125203","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21201628,0.76175946,0.015425818,0.0030930631,0.00059763156,0.00044904152,0.0028113085,0.00014488706,0.0037025074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94699043,0.046846427,0.0035599282,0.0008035726,0.00024847977,0.00031943765,0.00092859985,0.00006491305,0.00023818914],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.96576214,0.019656802,0.00643415,0.004750554,0.0028965648,0.000499701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82537615,0.14210826,0.0153459795,0.011882785,0.0044038696,0.0008830287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060146622,0.0015594956,0.004962669,0.009497364,0.00081271504,0.005596956,0.0020778151,0.0021012463,0.0032271745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11261613,0.0013043644,0.026076425,0.010254021,0.001896033,0.0035700663,0.0022474995,0.00222515,0.0002996906],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008071765,0.000058020905,0.19883353,0.01808571,0.7610286,0.000119336946,0.00047040117,0.00088599155,0.00030232267,0.00087192905,0.0004593961,0.018077606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028605072,0.00046828843,0.13078637,0.010291666,0.8456516,0.0003158405,0.00070166733,0.0017089726,0.00079939584,0.0056876997,0.0032183349,0.000084092986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035203928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040946407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060146622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011438107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014936051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3180895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945633278","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucz019","title":"Lead by Example? Custom-Made Examples Created by Close Others Lead Consumers to Make Dissimilar Choices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Uniqueness; Product (mathematics); Personalization; Order (exchange); Lead (geology); Marketing; Inference; Social network (sociolinguistics); Business; Computer science; Internet privacy; Advertising; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Social media; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08631711099978763,"score_gpt":0.3501022999547401,"score_spread":0.2637851889549525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945633278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869646,0.000089485184,0.0008663708,0.000291739,0.000014327887,0.000013076345,0.000015017387,0.0000119998485,0.011733432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719894,0.00006625826,0.0010529194,0.00017020383,0.0000057431853,0.000009900836,0.000022796596,0.000008498034,0.0014648384],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984863,0.00091168756,0.00006856169,0.00016326681,0.00027883897,0.00009128711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896409,0.006798264,0.0015848406,0.001029716,0.00047822707,0.0004680158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020959547,0.00020839433,0.00022068147,0.00031353484,0.00086856505,0.0023359493,0.00033737355,0.0010176533,0.010768971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014078936,0.00024558385,0.0003035207,0.00027211933,0.000968184,0.0023085384,0.0012972715,0.0010526297,0.0005642231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029135293,0.0028700614,0.6782266,0.0009835713,0.00054777437,0.0030510298,0.07431263,0.0022060534,0.025235076,0.038547616,0.006412146,0.16469392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003641641,0.0015746629,0.7321418,0.0006907938,0.0010104147,0.004807074,0.12128031,0.017300949,0.018821472,0.050582048,0.051051307,0.00037499718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008800136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018664774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010768971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038245978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022796635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036025822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951791475","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucz029","title":"I Am, Therefore I Buy: Low Self-Esteem and the Pursuit of Self-Verifying Consumption","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Erasmus Research Institute of Management","keywords":"Self-esteem; Pessimism; Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Trait; Social psychology; Self; Self-image; Redress; Shame; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.050708164971619,"score_gpt":0.32039355907364986,"score_spread":0.26968539410203085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951791475","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99863356,0.000045834535,0.000059733287,0.00015397096,0.0000047984067,0.0000032331443,0.0000068561694,0.0000012575423,0.0010908653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996221,0.000028333776,0.00007294465,0.000040420975,0.000003818594,0.0000031493505,0.000008197583,0.0000010004477,0.00021994147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995376,0.00020095274,0.00002652757,0.00006120559,0.00011329894,0.000060398328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992046,0.0027818088,0.0032020044,0.0004840224,0.00051734265,0.0009686969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015040925,0.00017135525,0.00020331878,0.00051482726,0.000578159,0.0017278428,0.0002649073,0.0006421647,0.0032789195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077635804,0.00020357095,0.0002452923,0.00030458308,0.0010958648,0.00056071265,0.0005227582,0.0012944655,0.00020704398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049199275,0.0012530078,0.97210646,0.000054978977,0.00008723757,0.00030968222,0.0066696214,0.000079352125,0.0020377543,0.0018262401,0.00047735573,0.014606369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021372793,0.0002591798,0.9911583,0.000030535306,0.000049739418,0.0002956727,0.0049535315,0.000624036,0.0006397961,0.0014302859,0.0005183648,0.000019090894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010530103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017378572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032789195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030330635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038767877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010969043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980200235","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucz045","title":"The Greenconsumption Effect: How Using Green Products Improves Consumption Experience","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":257,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Green consumption; Product (mathematics); Feeling; Active listening; Business; Marketing; Advertising; Headphones; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Production (economics); Aesthetics; Microeconomics; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05549076447096742,"score_gpt":0.33174303250209536,"score_spread":0.27625226803112796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980200235","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868794,0.00015673606,0.00064577645,0.00014548135,0.000019721441,0.000023377837,0.000030485737,0.000026001237,0.012072936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99779993,0.00009732664,0.0010021297,0.00006610323,0.0000069226226,0.000015018461,0.000024364259,0.0000101743435,0.0009779889],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992661,0.00034285375,0.000038679158,0.00010462194,0.0001699314,0.00007775176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958405,0.002738519,0.0005725994,0.00035408413,0.0002481928,0.0002461461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011547337,0.0002510417,0.00023780958,0.00033820086,0.0004022877,0.0013720883,0.0003263888,0.00053390476,0.008860729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005220297,0.0001805568,0.0003798469,0.00027125468,0.0009006513,0.0013172601,0.0013197435,0.00060878834,0.00026723277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010654714,0.013466972,0.2707368,0.0038834042,0.0013273271,0.0013607289,0.031783152,0.0029070103,0.29534483,0.024168793,0.004085175,0.34028107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022401779,0.0032859545,0.9520657,0.00016015112,0.00061144837,0.00022366724,0.0073537235,0.0016561878,0.02268855,0.0036990638,0.007960516,0.00007105809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069394294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012277926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008860729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039104666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026106086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029642105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2985269456","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucz056","title":"RETRACTED: Sorry by Size: How the Number of Apologizers Affects Apology Effectiveness","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Forgiveness; Empathy; Psychology; Social psychology; Stock (firearms); Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.04363684909395241,"score_gpt":0.4194764321903047,"score_spread":0.37583958309635235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2985269456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970757,0.00005608892,0.00021631249,0.00015223157,0.000009477181,0.000016721497,0.000013259177,0.000009386934,0.0024508694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832755,0.00003001544,0.0003518673,0.00007955762,0.0000062710556,0.000019427463,0.000014689646,0.000009809015,0.0011607807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976902,0.0011816262,0.00016835931,0.00027933132,0.00051976653,0.00016066857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.949014,0.033650868,0.009853577,0.0027535534,0.0015468257,0.0031811697],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003587248,0.00021701718,0.00030218155,0.0003258994,0.0005856644,0.0018306621,0.00046960727,0.00083908567,0.0088678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040097278,0.0002358658,0.00026042544,0.00016412097,0.00076465076,0.0010113415,0.0005776822,0.0013237661,0.0005130077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010406872,0.012492063,0.7993149,0.00034106942,0.0006363077,0.00082745217,0.012879181,0.00091574225,0.050982807,0.002572057,0.0024623198,0.10616922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010370405,0.0017761172,0.9868586,0.00004835807,0.00016403756,0.0002551814,0.0037544183,0.0011659547,0.0035600825,0.001189676,0.0010872273,0.00003657283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010619987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012949976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057385856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004352954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029665768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010978667","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaa012","title":"Food as Fuel: Performance Goals Increase the Consumption of High-Calorie Foods at the Expense of Good Nutrition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Overconsumption; Calorie; Pleasure; Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Marketing; Food choice; Environmental health; Economics; Business; Medicine; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.24460244333898853,"score_gpt":0.4731704666596852,"score_spread":0.22856802332069667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010978667","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957223,0.00012791288,0.0003124944,0.00019248384,0.000021206273,0.000018106886,0.000032948104,0.000018499033,0.0035539337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964617,0.0001586897,0.0014313811,0.00032841248,0.000013180609,0.000042221334,0.000066961875,0.000012079069,0.0014853033],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998116,0.00006243171,0.00000993494,0.00003237627,0.00005226399,0.00003146673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990865,0.00039962842,0.00021087335,0.00005292563,0.00005351121,0.0001965164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005487347,0.00021200176,0.00016865821,0.00019389768,0.00022242464,0.0006137804,0.00017028351,0.0005456835,0.0064471555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017793229,0.00014770954,0.00019544981,0.0001583373,0.00026774537,0.00035423992,0.0005237345,0.000653733,0.00040342848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02826838,0.05905908,0.22532311,0.0029798476,0.0011731727,0.00071854505,0.004434761,0.0015257997,0.37104726,0.005773014,0.00711741,0.29257962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046005586,0.009308827,0.9569347,0.000117976924,0.00031509274,0.00023885645,0.0009945607,0.0012559913,0.023933124,0.0017769359,0.004629786,0.000034159977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068084657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013854066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064471555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020072875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020271752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02156794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015261938","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaa018","title":"Blame It on the Self-Driving Car: How Autonomous Vehicles Can Alter Consumer Morality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":106,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Blame; Harm; Morality; Attribution; Moral responsibility; Dilemma; Relevance (law); Pedestrian; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.3121268886108097,"score_gpt":0.38200490801195247,"score_spread":0.06987801940114274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015261938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96935064,0.00027949168,0.0031903218,0.0018414751,0.00007720792,0.000018212859,0.000010814684,0.00001311633,0.025218695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979382,0.00009648835,0.00084971765,0.00023847345,0.0000042687507,0.0000071094055,0.0000049707915,0.000005160629,0.0008556098],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987587,0.0008640007,0.000018487157,0.000112698974,0.00016866454,0.000077442164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973807,0.001457768,0.0003997985,0.00022104208,0.00028791543,0.00025272922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017414404,0.00017097824,0.000121533434,0.00019075986,0.0008011536,0.0022917925,0.0003655426,0.0010313322,0.004180695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008287737,0.0001517137,0.00019584979,0.00009945556,0.0025994268,0.0011654922,0.00078425073,0.0011864123,0.00023929843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00334972,0.0063506654,0.18920986,0.0013502861,0.00059099216,0.002799849,0.17402616,0.0067409407,0.0904227,0.2197181,0.013679783,0.2917609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043916557,0.0032495386,0.3594883,0.0009820482,0.000615997,0.00157183,0.11659695,0.021398172,0.033831764,0.38259384,0.078940354,0.00029207484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015913486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002780835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004180695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094282976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071807904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013985813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017828742","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaa020","title":"A Little Piece of Me: When Mortality Reminders Lead to Giving to Others","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Innovation Council; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Materialism; Transcendence (philosophy); Donation; Possession (linguistics); Salience (neuroscience); Social psychology; Mortality salience; Psychology; Self-transcendence; Product (mathematics); Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.2474175609081937,"score_gpt":0.4850880497934714,"score_spread":0.23767048888527773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017828742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99658406,0.00016119958,0.00043223027,0.00041739238,0.00004823013,0.000011008052,0.00001454667,0.000015806489,0.0023154777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898094,0.0000783632,0.0002669587,0.00019506768,0.000024332805,0.0000071194277,0.000014952513,0.000004300693,0.00042800303],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999483,0.00028012,0.00002540882,0.00005486081,0.00010659294,0.00004999161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923199,0.0044962335,0.0019650292,0.00052560505,0.0002921236,0.00040124456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001245848,0.00015791919,0.00020522886,0.00026718536,0.00060061907,0.00092175545,0.00019103564,0.0006683398,0.004120453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015639214,0.00013775231,0.00019115389,0.00012918081,0.00063164334,0.0007264612,0.00075943104,0.0010986243,0.0002873224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01154295,0.003083637,0.5370407,0.0015658096,0.00080542534,0.0033717705,0.113576345,0.00107949,0.069409765,0.009799708,0.0112913605,0.237433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002715431,0.00519788,0.87169,0.0005234807,0.0006450443,0.0026192525,0.0712913,0.00211085,0.015292887,0.009027201,0.021173095,0.00015750986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036431613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006073733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004120453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020152864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016205522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01378423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037593043","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaa037","title":"Reviewing Experts’ Restraint from Extremes and Its Impact on Service Providers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Affect (linguistics); Service provider; Service (business); Psychology; Replicate; Metric (unit); Computer science; Aggregate (composite); Applied psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Business","score_opus":0.27081527036223724,"score_gpt":0.47832232462294005,"score_spread":0.20750705426070282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037593043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692532,0.0004318562,0.006571802,0.0012856452,0.00007388992,0.00015059044,0.00006605031,0.00017289715,0.021994192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970372,0.00009096836,0.001949408,0.00020883977,0.000049335544,0.000039188224,0.000032553122,0.00002783577,0.00056476967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9049678,0.058493458,0.0048306817,0.005052744,0.024194371,0.0024609696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36444157,0.48229426,0.07504328,0.03565463,0.03181192,0.010754231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047408406,0.00044373103,0.00092433277,0.0017911692,0.00210798,0.005611641,0.001261923,0.0014147095,0.0056991912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37504154,0.00050534337,0.00074491295,0.0011971837,0.0029921362,0.003445534,0.004400378,0.0022986028,0.0011951517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004841189,0.0024138084,0.617876,0.0010213777,0.0007007316,0.0012092099,0.04074228,0.004757721,0.023679717,0.00839559,0.0065805456,0.28778183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037734283,0.0038524882,0.9117958,0.0006253471,0.00047869462,0.0016567496,0.021626407,0.013184376,0.014358082,0.015078177,0.016551713,0.00041494373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029821738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028673182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047408406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025457516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026069195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2507226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043760017","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaa038","title":"How Concrete Language Shapes Customer Satisfaction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Concreteness; Customer satisfaction; Perception; Active listening; Psychology; Service (business); Consumer satisfaction; Consumer behaviour; Marketing; Business; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.10273295081736157,"score_gpt":0.34852931798143405,"score_spread":0.2457963671640725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043760017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973163,0.00006474946,0.00020499577,0.0002870886,0.000005035175,0.0000037788905,0.000045110683,0.000008978071,0.0020639265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995553,0.000020480014,0.00009836146,0.000063386164,0.0000038125786,0.0000027059502,0.000030129262,0.000004506609,0.00022144926],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879336,0.00068486854,0.00006812984,0.000107239815,0.000254795,0.000091564514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899244,0.0055968473,0.0021288258,0.0004548254,0.0010009471,0.0008941254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013848124,0.00016864215,0.00025011878,0.00048342563,0.0004926712,0.002636694,0.0002812484,0.00061113085,0.0073993704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010539594,0.00017818957,0.0002978741,0.00065428554,0.0010043593,0.0010439795,0.0007888625,0.0008100287,0.0006279007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011670453,0.0007497658,0.93556744,0.00015992143,0.00019529548,0.00057813496,0.0156516,0.00092472887,0.009279343,0.0019294347,0.0015710042,0.032226384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003448259,0.0006268001,0.9716663,0.0000617433,0.00009113554,0.0002828369,0.015696371,0.003515445,0.0016587173,0.004411005,0.0018995194,0.00005559444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001973299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019082796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073993704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055258715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035622937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024753392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3081768211","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaa044","title":"Attachment to and Detachment from Favorite Stores: An Affordance Theory Perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Transformative learning; Constructive; Perspective (graphical); Construct (python library); Situated; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Cognition; Power (physics); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.14525561414988386,"score_gpt":0.40036763403786946,"score_spread":0.2551120198879856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3081768211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6538205,0.0008089674,0.0467469,0.0058090882,0.00011580288,0.00007733788,0.00006377969,0.00006770368,0.29248998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967962,0.000133496,0.0013657259,0.000061270126,0.000008980854,0.000012282069,0.00001327112,0.000008298948,0.0016004913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982667,0.00085977896,0.00005808151,0.000247219,0.00032639134,0.00024181411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974419,0.0010396425,0.00044055862,0.00033048991,0.000244789,0.0005025648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021347417,0.00042086,0.0003086466,0.0019999975,0.0041937344,0.0066982643,0.0012977022,0.0014773885,0.0085634105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005303854,0.00044701726,0.00049280626,0.001014727,0.018211309,0.007667471,0.0077407667,0.0018587188,0.00035186068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045534915,0.000105180574,0.009079073,0.000104812985,0.000020192358,0.0007369182,0.08105402,0.00063810183,0.00083886023,0.8936723,0.0006065014,0.013098526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004055198,0.00020447784,0.034114428,0.0003646213,0.00007569686,0.0016502382,0.1421806,0.0087746065,0.00070630584,0.77877593,0.0330303,0.000082234874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004722749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050240117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085634105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002933201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010058729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028647423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122514184","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucz042","title":"People Rely Less on Consumer Reviews for Experiential than Material Purchases","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Education, India","keywords":"Experiential learning; Marketing; Quality (philosophy); Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Psychology; Business","score_opus":0.14709410006307616,"score_gpt":0.4492279794740847,"score_spread":0.30213387941100855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122514184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99065936,0.0007414648,0.0012851536,0.00021315402,0.000023959941,0.000021006232,0.00014091027,0.00004946227,0.0068655717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980596,0.0002222235,0.00060633064,0.00014451772,0.000032391552,0.0000075945914,0.00010038824,0.000013193765,0.00081380963],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975649,0.0009637185,0.00021879812,0.00037509474,0.0007603108,0.00011712335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95826745,0.022470038,0.012471813,0.002844351,0.0028174806,0.0011288963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015433134,0.00026889835,0.0003754103,0.0007238835,0.0004141197,0.001771618,0.00027963478,0.0006300083,0.0044847727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025033688,0.00028235425,0.00027982012,0.00037538866,0.0005392529,0.0016968036,0.00063537987,0.00052768155,0.0009184224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018898299,0.00056914083,0.7642544,0.0010679984,0.0007728955,0.0010852376,0.014315777,0.0004497318,0.036496043,0.0013786554,0.0038970106,0.17382337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003825121,0.0005353555,0.9738937,0.00021181302,0.00024985467,0.0016877064,0.0072625536,0.0018751498,0.005448077,0.0013231399,0.0073659522,0.00010854014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012585495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017772729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044847727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020775152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015274809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015003085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124955133","doi":"10.1086/374699","title":"Do Not Go Cheaply into That Good Night: Death-Ritual Consumption in Asante, Ghana: Table 1","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":234,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Table (database); Consumer research; Advertising; History; Sociology; Social science; Business; Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.15219557565761027,"score_gpt":0.4400537671996761,"score_spread":0.2878581915420658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124955133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977908,0.00013864422,0.000033857257,0.00021657998,0.000003355662,0.0000054202415,0.000038124654,9.608495e-7,0.0017722994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99854624,0.0002211542,0.00007619436,0.000041300125,0.0000021066808,0.0000063014604,0.000032476277,0.000001742894,0.0010724796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998617,0.000067147186,0.000008516153,0.000010570612,0.000012080494,0.00003998601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948007,0.0002021949,0.00018715742,0.000019216253,0.000031866002,0.00007950876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039164117,0.0001492912,0.00020250733,0.00033805918,0.0019201209,0.00080492266,0.00022996211,0.00037829406,0.005570918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010171438,0.00014715719,0.000078015306,0.0006583071,0.0013303186,0.0008658349,0.0008684066,0.00044883258,0.00023274761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006005322,0.00020299439,0.36405116,0.0004947887,0.00002402452,0.004281425,0.5836721,0.00009738694,0.0059296503,0.002598012,0.0020718235,0.035976056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014581692,0.00016900814,0.3367423,0.0001518549,0.000016406868,0.0014666026,0.64786553,0.000086787455,0.0006764356,0.00034488837,0.01244881,0.00001668881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007270417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025181878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007270417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006574271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034747532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018636584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127539243","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaa061","title":"The Politicization of Objects: Meaning and Materiality in The U.S. Cannabis Market","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychedelics and Drug Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Materiality (auditing); Legitimacy; Meaning (existential); Mainstream; Sociology; Business; Public relations; Marketing; Politics; Political science; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.15194786101290447,"score_gpt":0.4483239561966548,"score_spread":0.29637609518375035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127539243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8296562,0.00059682224,0.00581201,0.0055332617,0.000063715204,0.000029681543,0.000041287334,0.00001818852,0.1582489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916697,0.000067162044,0.0002836549,0.00008260932,0.000013451677,0.000004245537,0.0000064993924,0.0000059555155,0.0003694237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962076,0.002261132,0.00012082757,0.00025248807,0.0008671228,0.00029085792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98865485,0.0076016667,0.002002975,0.00058877585,0.00067213445,0.0004795994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051127756,0.00020348633,0.00035015424,0.002715262,0.004327767,0.010585875,0.00044763682,0.0013663261,0.0046242783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011990934,0.00030975055,0.0002716289,0.0019109879,0.029608289,0.008941976,0.0045566955,0.0018218732,0.00016770886],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017679956,0.00011186139,0.026471121,0.00012671472,0.000025306495,0.0006042797,0.120486185,0.0004626087,0.0021213437,0.8287473,0.00091866753,0.01974784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009801766,0.00022619708,0.08999443,0.0006141671,0.00006452312,0.00061565894,0.24750516,0.0045653083,0.0017229737,0.58966374,0.064808,0.000121897974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034025689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040395795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010585875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003275113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014919627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02703929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129206486","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucab012","title":"Audio Mining: The Role of Vocal Tone in Persuasion","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Tone (literature); Psychology; Perception; Competence (human resources); Empirical research; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09437855748580797,"score_gpt":0.38068100373107483,"score_spread":0.28630244624526685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129206486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98729324,0.000138507,0.0049841106,0.00014085062,0.000023993578,0.0000643857,0.000046382447,0.000039131755,0.0072693634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719393,0.000055981207,0.0021563822,0.000040992167,0.000017286142,0.000026365737,0.000020599462,0.000010267871,0.00047826947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997586,0.0012117213,0.00011387182,0.0002618721,0.0007239428,0.00010241708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9541748,0.037176803,0.0049294364,0.001276792,0.0018543832,0.00058769045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035683045,0.0003267714,0.0002546148,0.00087243825,0.00041377064,0.0024673021,0.00038180803,0.000585312,0.0034852389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03734629,0.00022504717,0.00021238108,0.00046702943,0.0008588217,0.0011217742,0.000817132,0.00069842767,0.00031847405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029261599,0.0018649858,0.5086454,0.0013233101,0.00038312798,0.0005925892,0.015576563,0.0027539895,0.116346695,0.005112779,0.00090684526,0.34356752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061834755,0.0012287762,0.9639834,0.00021165251,0.00020684661,0.00039231652,0.0048142592,0.007472426,0.015453362,0.0045418483,0.0015437519,0.00008937162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074092275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000830032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035683045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003567626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032653695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018871248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174533914","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucac024","title":"The Influence of Budgets on Consumer Spending","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychographic; Compliance (psychology); Economics; Consumer behaviour; Consumer spending; Consumer expenditure; Behavioral economics; Marketing; Public economics; Business; Finance; Psychology; Aggregate expenditure; Social psychology; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.3370500657519823,"score_gpt":0.524397804116713,"score_spread":0.18734773836473068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174533914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934268,0.0000923995,0.0003079111,0.0001350635,0.0000046603677,0.000008164347,0.00007006293,0.0000065994554,0.0059483876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99952865,0.000042492517,0.0001562459,0.000019320903,0.0000037011362,0.0000055837063,0.000033830755,0.0000035236017,0.0002067505],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984059,0.0010485643,0.00006670609,0.00013786422,0.00022630408,0.00011478106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97333604,0.017161371,0.0061982353,0.0010977329,0.0011021954,0.0011044481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017466124,0.00020740299,0.0001989102,0.00063673593,0.00033870197,0.0016272871,0.00021345951,0.0003223526,0.003616996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017512642,0.0001688518,0.00020982747,0.0005757616,0.0006706278,0.0005757196,0.0005148702,0.0006148961,0.00020529641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014228412,0.00087401934,0.94255483,0.00013226044,0.0003311865,0.0001818661,0.0038544491,0.0027779627,0.0041872906,0.004796713,0.0010751359,0.037811413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018964323,0.00018711547,0.9922998,0.000030598618,0.00006607563,0.00004609256,0.0014197325,0.002236491,0.0006796157,0.0017769595,0.001215464,0.000023144567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005740457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068265535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005740457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009862328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041604965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012100041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205389021","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucab046","title":"Consumer Timework","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Negotiation; Extant taxon; Consumer research; Sociology; Dynamics (music); Consumer behaviour; Marketing; Resource (disambiguation); Business; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.22037170545761114,"score_gpt":0.45904089625386496,"score_spread":0.23866919079625382,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205389021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.288669,0.0030060252,0.012457525,0.013431666,0.0007899823,0.00012093226,0.00022357798,0.00011975565,0.68118155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494111,0.001336559,0.0017441261,0.0010576813,0.00012980199,0.000061948434,0.00012290274,0.000069940776,0.04606599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972664,0.0012891063,0.00009303897,0.00032164284,0.0007238296,0.00030589974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966079,0.0013249994,0.00052301487,0.00041360786,0.00057219365,0.0005583123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022588228,0.0003417836,0.00025694224,0.001233066,0.0036293922,0.005860816,0.00085285876,0.0014166138,0.02190768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065289205,0.00019391208,0.00034910496,0.0012662411,0.0066044377,0.004977766,0.0046504927,0.0017962474,0.001428743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017265452,0.00015304118,0.016868204,0.00035808192,0.000033782308,0.0013594945,0.30999336,0.00034935627,0.0014775137,0.5275342,0.027393823,0.1143065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019448273,0.00008569123,0.010715262,0.0005387365,0.000018118797,0.0010172907,0.18887767,0.00052603346,0.0008412896,0.05418856,0.74312234,0.00004953264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004159176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036731598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02190768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032319298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018098957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0732885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206734233","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucab076","title":"Expression Modalities: How Speaking Versus Writing Shapes Word of Mouth","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Word of mouth; Modality (human–computer interaction); Psychology; Deliberation; Modalities; Expression (computer science); Emotionality; Social psychology; Word (group theory); Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Advertising; Computer science; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.177385914101838,"score_gpt":0.4393552792256463,"score_spread":0.2619693651238083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206734233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9761426,0.00076055876,0.0031736116,0.0003534374,0.000077042976,0.00009094752,0.00016365964,0.00005665622,0.01918151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99550086,0.0003423844,0.002131688,0.00019040248,0.00003353875,0.00007163433,0.00007473467,0.00006947674,0.0015851961],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755585,0.0014079298,0.00014003621,0.00024851414,0.00053531467,0.00011227774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752921,0.019431993,0.0027937547,0.00067731284,0.0014040675,0.0004007674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002464881,0.00026836485,0.0003319653,0.0004541161,0.0005374951,0.0042591044,0.00044635026,0.00074743264,0.010637823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041644223,0.0002566695,0.00031656606,0.00035493495,0.0008726972,0.002210201,0.0012481362,0.0007640746,0.0010743462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012602589,0.0013516723,0.17676635,0.0059799724,0.00060951436,0.00211385,0.13517845,0.0025316728,0.3345039,0.013897046,0.0070882337,0.3073768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006665111,0.0040121544,0.799608,0.0023373205,0.0014547603,0.002635673,0.06992282,0.0145689,0.046392478,0.028020589,0.029886646,0.00049423036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004980063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038363415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010637823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043265108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033163477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035587072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226216857","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucac019","title":"The Pursuit of Meaning and the Preference for Less Expensive Options","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Pleasure; Regret; Psychology; Happiness; Social psychology; Preference; Product (mathematics); Marketing; Economics; Business; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.2416538961291135,"score_gpt":0.3702515910350211,"score_spread":0.12859769490590758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226216857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956274,0.00017627366,0.00017874573,0.00019602006,0.0000062894555,0.0000054788275,0.000023474706,0.0000015006161,0.0037847634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990953,0.000139778,0.0002442184,0.000056834342,0.000006671304,0.0000039099664,0.000022915787,0.0000024762508,0.00042791283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923813,0.00038461701,0.00005003564,0.00005752178,0.00020888264,0.000060789127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99071395,0.0050372756,0.0027308103,0.00038623175,0.00040836557,0.00072337943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001685351,0.00013754678,0.00019200292,0.0006661269,0.00042737045,0.0021010533,0.00019527621,0.00074388756,0.007656938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010035902,0.00018159064,0.00029090344,0.00054818316,0.000904723,0.0008264852,0.00058792194,0.0009200905,0.00030478468],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026075316,0.0014922438,0.91567296,0.00040837092,0.0003221733,0.0005895441,0.00877483,0.00049343635,0.009660412,0.010416061,0.0010171677,0.04854535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006395802,0.00054778944,0.97338706,0.000113449794,0.00012562539,0.00054985844,0.009803073,0.0012974803,0.0010701038,0.010419549,0.0025659506,0.000056195313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000800933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017842818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007656938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026975316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022779795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025614977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280489959","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucac023","title":"Dysplacement and the Professionalization of the Home","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Culinary Culture and Tourism","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Professionalization; Asset (computer security); Sociology; Public relations; Identity (music); Aging in place; Sense of place; Dynamics (music); Ethnography; Personalization; Marketing; Business; Psychology; Aesthetics; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.05748504578736265,"score_gpt":0.32271925213637387,"score_spread":0.26523420634901124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280489959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9404812,0.00052419514,0.008098373,0.0014671889,0.000102428596,0.000019373896,0.000010176042,0.000035459663,0.049261563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971017,0.00007908255,0.0004935775,0.000055512246,0.000007097894,0.0000025380225,0.0000026638127,0.0000067087144,0.0022510535],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996759,0.0017929351,0.00011705128,0.00029154896,0.00068116427,0.00035823017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961958,0.0015155817,0.0006372141,0.0005635211,0.0005367718,0.0005510533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027701752,0.000247748,0.00028794078,0.0009078848,0.0034206635,0.004955589,0.00073912804,0.0009273765,0.0027915107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054329177,0.00020467173,0.00025373342,0.00050988334,0.019463317,0.0034071417,0.0052975737,0.0017670568,0.00019240408],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008159888,0.000048926442,0.0066924035,0.00010706971,0.000009325095,0.0012616226,0.9160894,0.00021196975,0.0037496933,0.0549385,0.00091106776,0.015898451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010262723,0.00015459194,0.010704973,0.00017883365,0.000013872784,0.0025914637,0.91048056,0.0009705698,0.0019533653,0.010885293,0.062002253,0.000053989002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061490014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059010773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061490014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023015465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016084065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016698956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287448059","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucac032","title":"Spending Windfall (“Found”) Time on Hedonic versus Utilitarian Activities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Moderation; Windfall gain; Economics; Psychology; Time allocation; Leisure time; Consumer expenditure; Microeconomics; Social psychology; Public economics; Aggregate expenditure","score_opus":0.3189884397468444,"score_gpt":0.5335490231583095,"score_spread":0.21456058341146517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287448059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977016,0.00010397303,0.0003247102,0.00004158895,0.000006288545,0.000012273662,0.000064266846,0.0000054006305,0.0017400145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987614,0.00008760086,0.0005940239,0.000036082638,0.0000059216272,0.000017386614,0.00008469177,0.0000033917727,0.00040941278],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955934,0.00016295062,0.000034948433,0.00006722701,0.00012420746,0.00005137395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969208,0.0013656622,0.00091738784,0.00025741433,0.00023830737,0.00030053363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085949944,0.00019018888,0.00023650783,0.00034716786,0.00026583282,0.00094950065,0.0002481539,0.0002582481,0.005751902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003494806,0.00014640867,0.00023206536,0.00028147263,0.0004204734,0.00055724423,0.0006450324,0.0004802963,0.00020184537],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039433194,0.0027111683,0.8262768,0.0010953086,0.00079685275,0.0003156595,0.008809618,0.0011091597,0.041112326,0.0023010846,0.0014373263,0.11009142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026360003,0.0005431768,0.9935534,0.000048993632,0.00006832395,0.000054734795,0.0023505047,0.00059968344,0.0011539625,0.00063554815,0.00094780105,0.000017656674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097073184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033363411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005751902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003372507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017788247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019242048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317911825","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucad006","title":"How Verb Tense Shapes Persuasion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Persuasion; Psychology; Verb; Moderation; Mediation; Present tense; Past tense; Linguistics; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.2009736769174266,"score_gpt":0.46084534608983807,"score_spread":0.25987166917241145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317911825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94860554,0.0005330247,0.0074374527,0.0010775002,0.00008281659,0.000053416632,0.0001352909,0.00011912209,0.04195588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973748,0.00010213674,0.0013006915,0.00017652124,0.000014934439,0.000026444988,0.000056820776,0.000054725468,0.00089288666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99499005,0.003396517,0.00018515399,0.00067563937,0.0005841158,0.00016847179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95058364,0.041000776,0.0034829427,0.0018520027,0.002482284,0.0005983431],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049016248,0.00026028123,0.00030409274,0.00079473417,0.00074547966,0.00519235,0.00045294254,0.0010983904,0.0072939782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060810592,0.00048499097,0.00029763707,0.0004582895,0.0015793743,0.004038304,0.0012152432,0.0014275536,0.0010219262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003663111,0.0012208426,0.34277117,0.0024093513,0.00060661114,0.0029836346,0.25240326,0.003401014,0.1269577,0.07362379,0.007050837,0.18290873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063190074,0.0015752913,0.5827701,0.0013260717,0.0014050766,0.003951066,0.07202408,0.0341182,0.03317852,0.21370186,0.054825723,0.0004920971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010141719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068893196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072939782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066216866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000445093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025922537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320726359","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucac055","title":"Beyond Numbers: An Ambiguity–Accessibility–Applicability Framework to Explain the Attraction Effect","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Attraction; CLARITY; Perception; Set (abstract data type); Cognitive psychology; Conceptual framework; Psychology; Phenomenon; Process (computing); Social psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.4113208688973397,"score_gpt":0.6004679743157054,"score_spread":0.1891471054183657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320726359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5929835,0.00088954845,0.34302092,0.003119006,0.00015138462,0.00033701494,0.00015290406,0.00016642243,0.05917924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838763,0.00010591326,0.015106003,0.00012842986,0.000026064006,0.000073946845,0.000017915834,0.000014121916,0.00065129856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990791,0.00049782067,0.00004514269,0.000115049,0.00018590815,0.00007701326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912072,0.0066793724,0.00055870076,0.00083471136,0.00047690576,0.0002431652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035387706,0.0004062043,0.0004514096,0.0009517278,0.00052005507,0.0013434868,0.0009767411,0.0010868323,0.009812722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011524911,0.00027432412,0.0009717011,0.00039195453,0.003923461,0.004557563,0.0018001539,0.00154959,0.00046053235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006166276,0.0004406021,0.009803543,0.00032615164,0.00005848968,0.000662591,0.0014238167,0.020795677,0.024328638,0.8972513,0.0006701349,0.043622486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085635394,0.00020834194,0.010688619,0.0000434476,0.000030383717,0.00027603537,0.00029440637,0.07341707,0.0025174986,0.9107796,0.001611554,0.000047421974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085176766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063624064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009812722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075847266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047980231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03282678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321153537","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucad013","title":"The Emergence and Evolution of Consumer Language Research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Key (lock); Consumer research; Service (business); Work (physics); Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Advertising; Marketing; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.13671566232447344,"score_gpt":0.4542574696067585,"score_spread":0.3175418072822851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321153537","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26390845,0.1761476,0.015692826,0.3076126,0.0021798897,0.00013642435,0.00050399784,0.00021553243,0.2336027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93264663,0.03762404,0.006635009,0.011780664,0.0019307337,0.00011479933,0.00011746345,0.00017653948,0.008973961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97819364,0.013475319,0.0008278035,0.0031826845,0.0034676117,0.0008529449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90382844,0.07490636,0.0034553255,0.0037896235,0.01126937,0.0027508193],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03314781,0.00039753132,0.0009116868,0.01076889,0.0034583714,0.015976803,0.0016523272,0.0038519753,0.0070570963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0285553,0.0005609823,0.00041246493,0.009248737,0.032628085,0.019481985,0.0061632353,0.005356008,0.000847307],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021783993,0.00014432805,0.011857458,0.0012574407,0.000044631422,0.00065251434,0.16346185,0.00020202177,0.0016411805,0.60288846,0.013106535,0.20452575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045642937,0.00020499647,0.03121758,0.0036460971,0.00003282863,0.001558479,0.14060658,0.0019007837,0.0016749643,0.19082029,0.6280905,0.00020121715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005881799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00422188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01057016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049902825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17530447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323045011","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucad016","title":"Cyclical Time Is Greener: The Impact of Temporal Perspective on Pro-Environmental Behavior","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Moderation; Time perspective; Consumption (sociology); Pace; Resource (disambiguation); Marketing; Perception; Sustainability; Natural resource; Preference; Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Economics; Sociology; Ecology; Microeconomics; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.0521882484431201,"score_gpt":0.427929084651294,"score_spread":0.3757408362081739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323045011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99222153,0.00019745647,0.0003850771,0.00042746373,0.000015829808,0.0000065026643,0.00002629937,0.000002365594,0.00671743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993185,0.0001298736,0.00017910493,0.00005995192,0.0000064431706,0.000004024668,0.000017036102,0.0000026470548,0.00028260157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990213,0.0005791694,0.000026168113,0.000106832966,0.00019388944,0.000072674506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853477,0.009401539,0.0030961249,0.00054405857,0.00061406026,0.0009965557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023871276,0.00015501474,0.00015016536,0.0004174578,0.0004803483,0.0018163319,0.00024298832,0.000423871,0.0051705707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008441579,0.00014047664,0.00035726462,0.0005393958,0.0011087023,0.0009823326,0.0008576065,0.0008453349,0.00013677226],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008793555,0.0013332071,0.9181229,0.00023052299,0.00036987892,0.00027443038,0.0226788,0.00038820136,0.0033505668,0.008743352,0.00091348635,0.042715307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003084506,0.00032892736,0.97341263,0.000101883044,0.00017154809,0.0000958651,0.018803475,0.0009902527,0.0004985324,0.0030685978,0.002471745,0.00002578199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040051388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009012512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051705707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006925671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006574588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017297328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323045013","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucad014","title":"Machine Talk: How Verbal Embodiment in Conversational AI Shapes Consumer–Brand Relationships","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Media Influence and Health","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Canada Research Chairs; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung","keywords":"Perception; Interface (matter); Psychology; Loyalty; Advertising; Brand management; Brand loyalty; Conceptual model; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Business; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.24268356871211394,"score_gpt":0.39656178260356956,"score_spread":0.15387821389145562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323045013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96087885,0.00028009136,0.010521934,0.0004947189,0.00002971841,0.00003044313,0.000041256233,0.000071145754,0.02765194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963857,0.000077381315,0.0024211141,0.0001030524,0.000012144052,0.000020283282,0.000019813251,0.000023977764,0.0009365899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837327,0.0009592419,0.00004393447,0.00021763217,0.00030683537,0.00009912662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99217975,0.00551554,0.0011612555,0.00041283137,0.0004006874,0.0003298458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020244005,0.0002418705,0.00013350819,0.00055765465,0.0005797703,0.00466899,0.00038558157,0.00079799426,0.0047040484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017180936,0.0003032997,0.00022384261,0.0002908638,0.0016736311,0.0022715568,0.0015886229,0.00076384784,0.0004089031],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00273121,0.0009904795,0.2524052,0.0012621232,0.00049032667,0.0014548044,0.22596428,0.008841326,0.16619146,0.08691141,0.0031279554,0.24962938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019779507,0.0015941988,0.6686968,0.0006302596,0.00070860225,0.0015968195,0.083757095,0.056594886,0.026772447,0.11567174,0.043385364,0.00039397102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012695307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010082615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047040484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006126334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034529023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01573664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362590534","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucad023","title":"Understanding and Improving Consumer Reactions to Service Bots","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"AI in Service Interactions","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":175,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Erasmus Research Institute of Management; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Service (business); Business; Service provider; Marketing; Automation; Service delivery framework; Service guarantee; Service level objective; Service quality; Service design; Engineering","score_opus":0.3554261394342855,"score_gpt":0.43805588810154017,"score_spread":0.08262974866725464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362590534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916393,0.000062826926,0.001185785,0.0004862544,0.0000064849737,0.000015231574,0.000028355174,0.000027593605,0.0065482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999258,0.000024270064,0.00028471256,0.00010869922,0.0000029838784,0.000005427782,0.000018860168,0.0000046668474,0.0002923847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978763,0.0011645773,0.000060942715,0.00017923817,0.00054544024,0.00017354061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98132104,0.011679291,0.0036854288,0.0008929861,0.0018610168,0.0005602481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037393672,0.0003687183,0.00030417595,0.0005093822,0.00046290504,0.002315028,0.00031619865,0.0014667204,0.0056958767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02007872,0.00020690919,0.00030202945,0.00033191405,0.0009066409,0.0015901944,0.0006211737,0.0011189618,0.00046113264],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018301472,0.001018604,0.8547967,0.0004066982,0.00016830843,0.0005245075,0.02779833,0.0028418524,0.01624489,0.00611979,0.0037395007,0.08451066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078366895,0.0010721827,0.91431403,0.00012815336,0.00018149536,0.00024306944,0.03447897,0.025657343,0.0061133592,0.009487227,0.008113322,0.00013243238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004830973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004039708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056958767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001518845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004477203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019775927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380318662","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucad032","title":"Morality Appraisals in Consumer Responsibilization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Free Will and Agency","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Concordia University; York University; University of Connecticut","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Morality; Consequentialism; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Law and economics; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.3538314790159234,"score_gpt":0.48833915423103663,"score_spread":0.13450767521511325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380318662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97033083,0.0001668144,0.0024885575,0.0017708088,0.00003587297,0.000049581246,0.00002183755,0.000015631113,0.02512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99848455,0.000074679396,0.0006302382,0.00023952805,0.000010097114,0.000020055839,0.000018031837,0.000006463342,0.00051632704],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98860884,0.0076002334,0.00032147794,0.00046992375,0.002552778,0.00044666938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96728146,0.019280523,0.005603451,0.0014152954,0.005393017,0.001026274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011508594,0.00034144378,0.0002466784,0.00086097204,0.0020528995,0.0052405517,0.0005312582,0.0017368508,0.0030803091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038774166,0.0002800243,0.00042367127,0.0005042727,0.0062084957,0.0030542705,0.0024547835,0.004176786,0.00023857287],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005126064,0.0006969726,0.19361776,0.00038926912,0.0001355853,0.0007312539,0.71204996,0.0006747618,0.006560652,0.047109485,0.002788427,0.0347332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068195004,0.00046237116,0.36192572,0.00047125507,0.0001077135,0.00064620894,0.5567205,0.0044035,0.003356133,0.037130736,0.034469172,0.00023850531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032802522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032433125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011508594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028917636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011098795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06086403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386983591","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucad063","title":"Post-Colonial Consumer Respect and the Framing of Neocolonial Consumption in Advertising","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Indian History and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Modernity; Politics; Middle class; Consumption (sociology); Framing (construction); Nationalism; Gender studies; Orientalism; Sociology; Advertising; History; Political science; Social science; Law; Business","score_opus":0.0948457829241134,"score_gpt":0.3516268023439579,"score_spread":0.2567810194198445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386983591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58497787,0.0016088946,0.0016944086,0.0052206493,0.000107237174,0.000014740762,0.00002589303,0.000024971787,0.40632537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973393,0.000120282784,0.00008638382,0.000069574184,0.000018656705,0.0000014207839,0.0000018665168,0.0000055644505,0.0023569404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859124,0.0008710294,0.000026091424,0.0001043441,0.00019013503,0.00021718245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979791,0.0010731525,0.00033600844,0.00023437158,0.00018470448,0.00019265462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017565783,0.00021629725,0.0001612222,0.0012155737,0.0052316426,0.008334612,0.00034293838,0.0007687755,0.0032283894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022548554,0.00017417477,0.00013237607,0.0012380471,0.022980979,0.0020999638,0.0029020952,0.0020023687,0.0001395445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007632687,0.000037293306,0.0047050873,0.000055936755,0.000006401146,0.0006036171,0.38157493,0.00009612911,0.0010075005,0.5999714,0.0010570256,0.010808402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032678425,0.00013144336,0.053279568,0.00048548204,0.00006561093,0.0012828154,0.43659404,0.0010815222,0.0031092858,0.15304337,0.35080203,0.00009214302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012768031,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016555931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012768031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005579473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013489794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040482104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387031413","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucad064","title":"Epistemological Jangle and Jingle Fallacies in the Consumer–Brand Relationship Subfield: A Call to Action","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Construct (python library); Action (physics); Psychology; Limit (mathematics); Social psychology; Call to action; Computer science; Epistemology; Cognitive psychology; Advertising; Mathematics; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.33394492009960863,"score_gpt":0.4278449209442779,"score_spread":0.09390000084466926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387031413","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17179377,0.027134264,0.05206484,0.7290301,0.004289725,0.00028958224,0.00020292801,0.00024640452,0.014948434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062086,0.0062279766,0.04354005,0.039225742,0.0025107688,0.00052542286,0.00015256002,0.00022026776,0.0013886372],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8309562,0.10759998,0.017577631,0.009888003,0.03013885,0.0038392672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34373,0.53497505,0.034044463,0.04017261,0.0408102,0.006267651],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2833546,0.0008165688,0.0034380043,0.016538031,0.014471608,0.034170005,0.004925398,0.009087347,0.003407075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3570399,0.0012273963,0.0012827696,0.016302455,0.09257543,0.057595205,0.018867277,0.018952228,0.00051176595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031914518,0.00025151382,0.06567162,0.0021135085,0.00021805901,0.0011061659,0.3911215,0.00045302024,0.0015260038,0.3199743,0.023085516,0.1941596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051004205,0.00013951362,0.03787803,0.0072451266,0.0000933756,0.0012924804,0.4496108,0.0021891035,0.0012041511,0.39749852,0.1024791,0.00031882006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010020999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016751826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2833546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014871491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019962542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88375133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390096657","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucad080","title":"<i>When</i> Language Matters","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Conversation; Cognition; Competence (human resources); Service (business); Style (visual arts); Conversation analysis; Psychology; Work (physics); Contrast (vision); Marketing; Computer science; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Business; Artificial intelligence; Communication","score_opus":0.08563480418208609,"score_gpt":0.42863929096311293,"score_spread":0.34300448678102685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390096657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8051539,0.008144497,0.029433109,0.04892138,0.0016359648,0.00016045016,0.0005980465,0.0003357853,0.10561678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920806,0.00077150576,0.0023052972,0.0026519108,0.0002480564,0.000047520258,0.00010087736,0.000117489886,0.0016767315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909087,0.005964297,0.00051618385,0.0008935795,0.0010867874,0.0006304953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97477096,0.01622883,0.00370341,0.0016257564,0.0026221068,0.0010488633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009619737,0.00032163275,0.0005353596,0.001627776,0.0029442345,0.010041826,0.0008450602,0.0013703678,0.007401739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0450639,0.00029013428,0.0003576098,0.0018710732,0.00752364,0.013307774,0.0036596847,0.002601716,0.0012958576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013913169,0.00021390802,0.08407424,0.0023434283,0.00020516504,0.0017248327,0.438054,0.0004082249,0.03549132,0.11915244,0.038382266,0.2785589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056101093,0.00026666385,0.15437543,0.0024536094,0.00023459281,0.001527496,0.57761073,0.0025139516,0.011491673,0.1307436,0.118449286,0.00027690706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024310285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030127657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010041826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020840652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011920922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05087465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391172998","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucae005","title":"How Does Rating Specific Features of an Experience Alter Consumers' Overall Evaluations of That Experience?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Mack Institute for Innovation Management, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Business","score_opus":0.13421221607545367,"score_gpt":0.4690190333884811,"score_spread":0.3348068173130274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391172998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941261,0.00007294409,0.00066549715,0.00007202134,0.000013191391,0.000030918916,0.00004066464,0.000016435059,0.0049621803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989392,0.00004761676,0.0005420013,0.000060548915,0.000009071529,0.000016676473,0.000041081264,0.000008074674,0.00033581216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962022,0.002204427,0.00019421347,0.00043024906,0.00081753515,0.00015150262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9561059,0.031000717,0.0059987833,0.0031114274,0.002699115,0.0010840785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005236561,0.00024181887,0.00032256442,0.0004588996,0.00030418058,0.002468664,0.0003023343,0.0007423851,0.0037416255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035305455,0.00024081592,0.000500839,0.00039386307,0.00070187036,0.001702673,0.0006488134,0.0007862123,0.00042860437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050900043,0.002070921,0.82402074,0.0006371896,0.00090002484,0.00031396595,0.013002953,0.0015330948,0.05165173,0.0014530672,0.001192909,0.09813336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054427543,0.001490478,0.98685175,0.000053804783,0.00021186429,0.0001010975,0.0032899727,0.002260087,0.0040048147,0.0006651599,0.0009635018,0.000053089716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010265773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015233133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005236561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003515552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016870165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027693927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394992318","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucae027","title":"Retail Karma: How Our Shopping Sins Influence Evaluation of Service Failures","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Karma; Service (business); Business; Advertising; Marketing; Operations management; Engineering; History","score_opus":0.16359571383479263,"score_gpt":0.40051437928322764,"score_spread":0.236918665448435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394992318","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99397624,0.00003740047,0.00028462266,0.00020873145,0.0000074550617,0.000010081774,0.000018317052,0.000009996089,0.005447015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995714,0.000013352233,0.00008324964,0.00004376438,0.0000029293783,0.0000035977234,0.000013154555,0.000008018169,0.00026051773],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970606,0.0017188003,0.00010978883,0.00036552767,0.00051828753,0.00022689818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9642437,0.0216193,0.007828703,0.0024213109,0.001817366,0.0020696593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003037171,0.00023362674,0.0003804207,0.00070650084,0.0011933463,0.0051121963,0.0005139673,0.0011578144,0.008478406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033078246,0.00032185696,0.00035756244,0.0006048861,0.0026746653,0.0017456706,0.001619521,0.0015875273,0.00047289746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029819338,0.002493441,0.91155165,0.00012532267,0.0003187352,0.000638639,0.040670957,0.0020122412,0.0060427054,0.008102737,0.0017121446,0.023349453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007897254,0.0005842096,0.96523994,0.000055946002,0.00019536554,0.00015313693,0.01777661,0.005457705,0.0011435095,0.006651709,0.0025650798,0.00009788564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066174804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007880818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008478406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012843834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007101849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028363109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396239788","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucae029","title":"Back to the Present: How Direction of Mental Time Travel Affects Similarity and Saving","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Outcome (game theory); Point (geometry); Intervention (counseling); Social psychology; Scale (ratio); Chronesthesia; Psychological intervention; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Cognition; Economics; Microeconomics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.16035055758170186,"score_gpt":0.48901080055518015,"score_spread":0.3286602429734783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396239788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99729496,0.00006826015,0.00022235014,0.0001894644,0.000011725396,0.000007800294,0.000025698479,0.0000074613577,0.0021723162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985228,0.00008777342,0.000485335,0.000076446006,0.000005088515,0.000016199347,0.00004457976,0.0000060105817,0.0007557675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952054,0.00021862992,0.0000205947,0.00008123888,0.00011525691,0.000043759606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99504787,0.0024056938,0.0013006174,0.000362871,0.00032585123,0.00055700686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083205407,0.00021784684,0.00022193676,0.00037152338,0.0005233031,0.0018906279,0.00031830012,0.00059739716,0.006057794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01093463,0.0002012911,0.00027186933,0.00023172663,0.0006864524,0.0009567031,0.00074100296,0.0011256476,0.0003870593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010798926,0.011979438,0.6735023,0.0008521119,0.0010435033,0.00080923655,0.08302668,0.0027703443,0.035696987,0.01059353,0.0060472325,0.16287972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017329518,0.0017535724,0.9594707,0.00012791957,0.00046703345,0.00021332284,0.021247469,0.0033622,0.0036563554,0.0065347897,0.0029154206,0.00007794795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002213379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031033827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006057794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044641728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028797647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02026534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396997808","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucae031","title":"How Do Physical Disability Cues Influence Assumptions about Consumer Tastes? Unpacking the Disability Preference Stereotype","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Unpacking; Preference; Psychology; Stereotype (UML); Social psychology; Physical disability; Cognitive psychology; Economics; Microeconomics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.13984106048142128,"score_gpt":0.3850813008526394,"score_spread":0.24524024037121814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396997808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99310064,0.000058260892,0.00059573754,0.000074199124,0.00001233126,0.00003562565,0.000025220243,0.0000040055893,0.00609395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989214,0.000047298912,0.00038453966,0.00006458654,0.0000048900342,0.000029680228,0.000021523478,0.000005991327,0.00052012445],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974831,0.0013584908,0.0001435603,0.00026789407,0.0006244214,0.0001226437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888658,0.006952972,0.0019939712,0.0010484491,0.0009116097,0.0002272395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004884226,0.00018839697,0.000210004,0.0005292966,0.0006377253,0.0023713107,0.0002301968,0.00054228265,0.004986264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01845567,0.0001990734,0.00028137388,0.0002779753,0.001587838,0.0013206324,0.0012141574,0.00058621366,0.00027550256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011751622,0.00382444,0.6034072,0.0012699717,0.00046389483,0.00069386157,0.15586577,0.0011097863,0.11004017,0.011616022,0.0016568521,0.09830041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001925821,0.0024126577,0.8958771,0.0003938715,0.00025574153,0.00034804633,0.07339139,0.0025970668,0.0117169665,0.0064984313,0.00613648,0.00017964754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026539695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003411621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004986264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005286661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033829792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025830567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400310227","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucae040","title":"Why and How Consumers Perform Online Reviewing Differently","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Marketing; Psychology; Advertising","score_opus":0.1565134368799798,"score_gpt":0.44823970800989144,"score_spread":0.2917262711299117,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400310227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96481353,0.000632779,0.0043053045,0.0031372786,0.00008805863,0.000113637485,0.000083331375,0.00008358105,0.026742449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99321777,0.0003465731,0.002506302,0.0007673114,0.00005432282,0.000045958754,0.000059686186,0.000047982074,0.0029540495],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9845064,0.009222475,0.00081837963,0.00088072073,0.0039457297,0.0006262756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.918231,0.042364463,0.015480902,0.004931876,0.016597781,0.0023939165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009928297,0.00020770953,0.00030828163,0.001264187,0.0019957428,0.005866868,0.000507905,0.0010124283,0.0027379899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05483088,0.0002146193,0.00033377192,0.0009826542,0.0020090807,0.0031972514,0.0014559631,0.0008564856,0.00082903844],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005450319,0.0003923513,0.3532048,0.0011100195,0.00021361798,0.001683568,0.38242337,0.00049474085,0.026005793,0.017298145,0.01830895,0.19831958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007509269,0.0006028242,0.3924716,0.0009809277,0.00030777213,0.0018401537,0.43213713,0.0035823747,0.015130407,0.019397438,0.13314112,0.00033315065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029305972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006609601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009928297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015520826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017281587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052506506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401940721","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucae051","title":"Brand Teasing: How Brands Build Strong Relationships by Making Fun of Their Consumers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Psychology; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.15428097389551002,"score_gpt":0.4295849337964817,"score_spread":0.2753039599009717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401940721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9811275,0.00019129194,0.0014142698,0.00035936077,0.000020331998,0.000019693542,0.000013453351,0.000021364827,0.016832655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980718,0.00012406262,0.0009665711,0.000106354455,0.000007595003,0.000009274999,0.000009643416,0.000010606836,0.00069402833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985909,0.0008466814,0.000035672256,0.00015592299,0.00025521195,0.00011552204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99469393,0.002881307,0.0010257653,0.00066598586,0.00028878593,0.0004442265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025147686,0.00019882507,0.00015414598,0.0006722961,0.0012310885,0.0035707736,0.00039269956,0.0006324352,0.0056343377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009598766,0.00025282352,0.00024608546,0.00038804614,0.002136994,0.002914285,0.0018449007,0.001048773,0.0003179665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091395905,0.0019170747,0.35371986,0.0011584098,0.00046236935,0.0011083311,0.23362638,0.0007745578,0.046264574,0.03989582,0.004540128,0.31561857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012422891,0.0019289842,0.67483836,0.0006844786,0.0005293515,0.0019076393,0.21892291,0.0033265727,0.015918879,0.03666761,0.04497,0.00018091706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074177055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016456814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056343377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047856997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044507755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018848717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402567610","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucae056","title":"Moralizing Everyday Consumption: The Case of Self-Care","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Morality; Social psychology; Moral disengagement; Autonomy; Everyday life; Sociology; Moral authority; Psychology; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.3308698532932167,"score_gpt":0.4472821986853688,"score_spread":0.11641234539215206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402567610","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46225086,0.0026209983,0.02375509,0.03410667,0.00047111942,0.00005426946,0.000021296579,0.000042037616,0.47667772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956655,0.00022917593,0.0014840344,0.0007614243,0.00003526499,0.000013694739,0.0000038985063,0.000011573387,0.0017954806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919378,0.0061922395,0.0001158185,0.00043487354,0.00081455434,0.00050470635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99477166,0.0026037227,0.0006555929,0.00088244525,0.0006092099,0.00047748757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056066886,0.00027236177,0.0002685653,0.00069985754,0.005805702,0.00805656,0.0010078758,0.004019919,0.002230145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009891066,0.00025154965,0.00034824832,0.00039404503,0.0552208,0.005529,0.0050186133,0.0053437226,0.00020314127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046948222,0.00008991979,0.0024801774,0.0000715301,0.000016199994,0.0013130214,0.15917066,0.00028542528,0.00081767375,0.82617897,0.001679489,0.00784993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044084984,0.00006586364,0.0052055474,0.00037070052,0.000028201504,0.0018284258,0.14192493,0.002409732,0.0017214483,0.76216,0.084171034,0.00007013288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004467343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042433133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00805656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005120949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023818167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03715527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405737770","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucae067","title":"The Beneficent and Maleficent Effects of Simplification on Retirement Savings","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; MetLife Foundation","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.30116675975116153,"score_gpt":0.5224321966900338,"score_spread":0.2212654369388723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405737770","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99454075,0.000096725686,0.0004560568,0.00019035785,0.0000114444,0.00005228919,0.0000739725,0.000015412244,0.004562974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99762255,0.00007973515,0.0011169186,0.0001124241,0.000012501101,0.000036535155,0.000060785085,0.000005856444,0.0009527635],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980562,0.0010106595,0.00012744797,0.00022221915,0.0004195746,0.00016397746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96644986,0.023356728,0.005014439,0.0036010859,0.0008679829,0.0007099732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035842545,0.00034156846,0.00033202957,0.0004538986,0.0006645439,0.0011187637,0.00049239775,0.0006455382,0.011734112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03412355,0.0002597351,0.00034925976,0.00026514207,0.0010940279,0.0012686272,0.00094658136,0.00075381424,0.0004660644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022411508,0.019424798,0.31738216,0.002237244,0.00082406454,0.00095331017,0.017455716,0.00829729,0.09899864,0.014204289,0.0050120205,0.49279895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010561352,0.008238253,0.9362711,0.0002942997,0.00066808047,0.00031299732,0.0039981133,0.0062471894,0.021019965,0.012400677,0.009369171,0.00012401858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002265697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031844203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011734112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005972118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046071742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039254487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406634600","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaf002","title":"When and Why Consumers (Erroneously) Believe Income Impacts the Enjoyment of Consumption Experiences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Psychology; Economics; Marketing; Social psychology; Advertising; Business; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.07600709529584855,"score_gpt":0.3652086646963996,"score_spread":0.2892015694005511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406634600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98992467,0.00006935823,0.0014203455,0.00083414,0.000012913012,0.000010632607,0.00003935485,0.000007864164,0.0076807574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995759,0.00002713807,0.00014451025,0.00006321933,0.0000044758067,0.000002728239,0.00001610809,0.0000017266128,0.00016412398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905986,0.00037074744,0.000048319474,0.00013590748,0.00024263251,0.00014253214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909554,0.0040742615,0.0025295434,0.0006590828,0.0014315909,0.00035011803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002325355,0.00015021693,0.00016531526,0.00044142103,0.00039491523,0.0021162643,0.00024724466,0.0007672456,0.002992577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016919171,0.00021486336,0.00019896768,0.00026598977,0.0015964471,0.0014284851,0.0007070006,0.0007521581,0.00023857877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068137055,0.00018258547,0.9437858,0.000105097686,0.00013614446,0.00023782042,0.0141435,0.00078845676,0.005011667,0.0076279473,0.0010082889,0.026291313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021970372,0.00012245339,0.96527606,0.000043516397,0.00007775784,0.000092886876,0.016313985,0.0047448496,0.0018906028,0.0099097015,0.0014699727,0.000036124322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055720173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059831114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055720173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072445424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002810203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012297809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409126846","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaf019","title":"Reparative Consumption: The Role of Racial Identity and White Guilt in Consumer Preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Retail Behavior Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia; Queen's University; Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); White (mutation); Psychology; Identity (music); Social psychology; Consumer behaviour; Advertising; Business; Sociology; Aesthetics; Art; Social science","score_opus":0.1125377042007829,"score_gpt":0.4114174415386299,"score_spread":0.298879737337847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409126846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99784815,0.000035818393,0.00011353637,0.00008987319,0.0000027297874,0.0000041082462,0.0000059803706,6.106829e-7,0.0018992055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99975866,0.0000141625615,0.00005418647,0.000025719004,0.000002324306,0.0000029426485,0.00000428257,5.7635606e-7,0.00013701341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991615,0.0005063682,0.00002782589,0.00007310466,0.00015190257,0.000079274476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951095,0.0019440607,0.0019532416,0.0003183135,0.00027530195,0.00039949283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024110393,0.00016722518,0.00015099211,0.0003985325,0.0007697663,0.0013738248,0.00019422184,0.00036265037,0.0028801113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067226165,0.00012152658,0.00027325493,0.00029408274,0.0013034553,0.0007819094,0.0007347528,0.0007513705,0.000105153464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001125049,0.0012993811,0.9554221,0.000043023803,0.0001636157,0.00019707532,0.012851068,0.0001699401,0.0021183372,0.0041953176,0.00031750748,0.022097696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000105016015,0.0001672024,0.99104804,0.000019803007,0.000037884143,0.00006381518,0.006016102,0.0005458072,0.00048904406,0.0010436258,0.0005483334,0.000009852272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044969027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069179432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044969027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036514402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003633666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012750924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409229217","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaf023","title":"Digital Affective Encounters: The Relational Role of Content Circulation on Social Media","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Circulation (fluid dynamics); Content (measure theory); Social media; Psychology; Digital content; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.17860787233273204,"score_gpt":0.43786710134294815,"score_spread":0.25925922901021614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409229217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84640837,0.0006755463,0.008642771,0.002618578,0.00009232795,0.00005401134,0.000084433465,0.00008942768,0.14133447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975623,0.00014033457,0.0005789916,0.00008405972,0.000029878469,0.000010071859,0.000012827452,0.000018920393,0.0015625337],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778914,0.0015098692,0.00005061672,0.00017519009,0.00031701202,0.00015813569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939434,0.0043261275,0.00071426283,0.00034009438,0.00026983698,0.0004063067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018263541,0.00019864923,0.00015315996,0.0016376714,0.003467512,0.00750669,0.0004633397,0.00078381214,0.005783615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073698564,0.00025640972,0.0001799585,0.0010923289,0.00628036,0.0067177503,0.0047489395,0.0010951792,0.0003759764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002416803,0.0001691873,0.05027563,0.0002645162,0.0000761913,0.0023367729,0.6962817,0.00033888195,0.014645589,0.15676601,0.0023495706,0.07625426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053762833,0.00032623037,0.12923136,0.0005270464,0.00016267624,0.0027805741,0.6144642,0.003453122,0.0055459375,0.073344946,0.16997398,0.00013605869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012188258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014496834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00750669,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012077269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005462898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019348145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409248810","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaf022","title":"From Stigma to Support: “Black-Owned” Labels and Expertise Stereotypes in Cannabis and Psychedelics Markets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Stigma (botany); Cannabis; Psychology; Social psychology; Advertising; Business; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.048250067098029925,"score_gpt":0.4176126692553971,"score_spread":0.36936260215736716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409248810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9902176,0.000098806944,0.00015947993,0.0014143748,0.000011676957,0.000006862395,0.00001087499,0.0000014644502,0.008078907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994698,0.00004929586,0.000041866107,0.00020191939,0.00000784392,0.0000039057963,0.0000043333407,0.0000015779519,0.00021941526],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959223,0.0022622205,0.00010357473,0.00029385785,0.0009708645,0.00044715166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98415875,0.008859781,0.004721878,0.00061091187,0.0007500523,0.0008985738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042652767,0.0002508735,0.00024425468,0.0007390372,0.0027616064,0.0033073905,0.00045233764,0.0012608741,0.006602304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01528732,0.0002232094,0.00031543057,0.00042230837,0.004975278,0.002434947,0.0034936871,0.0018887934,0.00021860651],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014661066,0.0024092693,0.4561986,0.00036148983,0.00016435767,0.000978721,0.43372104,0.00029911057,0.009723153,0.031035952,0.002539287,0.061102968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011427141,0.00035195606,0.5866923,0.0004610921,0.00012943424,0.00040463384,0.38440043,0.0014111666,0.0035890837,0.011949087,0.010414547,0.00008204227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008552102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009353115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008552102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017820785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012682375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022557199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411976984","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaf041","title":"Why Horizontal Organizations Don’t Fall Flat: Organizational Structure Shapes Perceptions of Egalitarianism and Company Warmth","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Response Biomedical (Canada); BC Innovation Council; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Egalitarianism; Perception; Organizational structure; Horizontal and vertical; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Management; Economics; Mathematics; Geometry; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.019198033963138746,"score_gpt":0.29240155133407114,"score_spread":0.2732035173709324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411976984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99496955,0.000046856887,0.00020069703,0.00029889657,0.0000051364323,0.0000037894492,0.000004819451,0.0000020608732,0.004468294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981195,0.000011698211,0.000033986107,0.000029457018,0.0000014543665,9.686321e-7,0.000002876821,0.0000010830985,0.00010657689],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869376,0.00062350533,0.00004095645,0.00011607896,0.00030250513,0.00022315647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918001,0.0023986115,0.0030852165,0.00046023264,0.0005926904,0.0016629945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001756452,0.00015025848,0.00016376347,0.0007089235,0.0014384942,0.0040322384,0.00029746545,0.0007315194,0.004191835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005214698,0.0001940769,0.00017741056,0.00039364255,0.0047218953,0.0012799992,0.0015492936,0.0008707511,0.00024504733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052183075,0.00059670577,0.83585346,0.00009704616,0.0001781955,0.00043983804,0.11672742,0.00047880443,0.0068531437,0.01606925,0.001277773,0.020906493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002475946,0.00021390131,0.87473315,0.00007534854,0.000032174412,0.00008598142,0.114275515,0.00069122843,0.00058604515,0.006064541,0.0031885281,0.000028835177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032286504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006236378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004191835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012720769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006815981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014023125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412032239","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaf044","title":"The Marketplace of Existential Authenticity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Gender, Feminism, and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Business; Marketing; Psychology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10828374700908865,"score_gpt":0.49170862731950776,"score_spread":0.3834248803104191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412032239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35618103,0.0016566048,0.07163522,0.022706218,0.0004932801,0.000121632846,0.00008354912,0.00019137285,0.546931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603736,0.00011859827,0.001423161,0.00019283399,0.00004049853,0.000017186088,0.0000068583827,0.000023234468,0.0021402708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898865,0.0073968475,0.0002247223,0.00070387486,0.0012529427,0.0005350902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836624,0.008470351,0.0023013672,0.002893061,0.0014790994,0.0011937332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009898815,0.00039962184,0.0003541165,0.001953017,0.0052195117,0.011811579,0.001288804,0.0017500293,0.005302413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0140850125,0.00037073754,0.00032282804,0.0012089394,0.06582939,0.011622193,0.011734051,0.0029867354,0.00038307626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028216124,0.000022516804,0.0011335645,0.0000658633,0.0000073169017,0.00024416167,0.093315326,0.00011909038,0.0007968544,0.8958469,0.0006912117,0.007728996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003189272,0.00014160444,0.0029988312,0.00044658128,0.000025024387,0.0010913548,0.17376103,0.0014663679,0.0030251483,0.63819134,0.17876051,0.000060384824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007021048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006182996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011811579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028769444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024213365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05235052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413473869","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaf049","title":"The Confirmation Nudge: Prompts to Change or Confirm Initial Preferences Steer Consumer Choice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Consumer choice; Advertising; Economics; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Business","score_opus":0.621304329678497,"score_gpt":0.6006559536574757,"score_spread":0.02064837602102132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413473869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903362,0.00017482245,0.0028738617,0.00031239685,0.00008748606,0.00016536521,0.00009505058,0.00033769585,0.005617141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057746,0.000087919114,0.0075074155,0.00035463198,0.00003963203,0.00021239356,0.0000547952,0.000051139763,0.0011146067],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978479,0.001419182,0.00015070284,0.00026012957,0.00021234903,0.000109771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9258952,0.06367441,0.004276074,0.003961498,0.00086498354,0.0013278344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037216237,0.000493942,0.0004853443,0.00030345848,0.00039529242,0.0010154868,0.0005409716,0.0013161591,0.011485428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03454622,0.00040805267,0.00021209476,0.00019952032,0.0007378102,0.001563263,0.00083907647,0.0011654195,0.00092671416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07708545,0.029224144,0.11560829,0.0043421783,0.00036109894,0.0015323883,0.010217539,0.008211857,0.2926695,0.014742576,0.01760805,0.4283969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0143325655,0.05774515,0.6657846,0.0012724679,0.0011068737,0.0011152397,0.0073660812,0.0498714,0.117850274,0.025972681,0.056513574,0.001069013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006107096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010175083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011485428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043085104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042301242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038422585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413910370","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaf052","title":"Surviving as a Vegan in a World of Omnivores: Relational Fractures in Shared Practices","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Organic Food and Agriculture","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Concordia University","keywords":"Omnivore; Vegan Diet; Advertising; Business; Biology; Medicine; Ecology","score_opus":0.07949503119323875,"score_gpt":0.3889810233960895,"score_spread":0.3094859922028507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413910370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9570454,0.00033569665,0.014531508,0.002441279,0.000037523456,0.000034208235,0.000011938224,0.000049908154,0.025512543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974915,0.000047035363,0.0014283867,0.00007501542,0.0000033480078,0.00001020069,0.0000051199927,0.00001076353,0.0009286865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909738,0.0059372177,0.00021068272,0.00078325317,0.0011783662,0.0009167569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99246526,0.0035061785,0.0012264504,0.001507957,0.00049434125,0.0007999455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072423327,0.00043167121,0.00038487904,0.001340515,0.007393888,0.005761039,0.0012570622,0.0017434258,0.002658177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01207193,0.00047422643,0.00035888405,0.00068407354,0.035792008,0.006360535,0.014611248,0.0025653765,0.00019283274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066131826,0.00007014953,0.014204375,0.00010404771,0.000024012861,0.001155896,0.91689056,0.00025507415,0.0033835787,0.041285638,0.0005505257,0.022010071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001484547,0.00017900355,0.018737892,0.00023818082,0.000028226454,0.002056403,0.9019606,0.0010980078,0.0017745756,0.03720903,0.036622483,0.000080751495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042976732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077059194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007393888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032745635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021851843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038301587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416935897","doi":"10.1093/jcr/ucaf066","title":"Promotion Architecture: A Deal Fairness Model of Restricted Price Promotions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Consumer Research","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Hong Kong Polytechnic University; University of Washington","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Liberian dollar; Value (mathematics); Loss aversion; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.08827530560734606,"score_gpt":0.35407190040620673,"score_spread":0.26579659479886064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416935897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7703217,0.00034416857,0.15272444,0.0021664954,0.00013122907,0.00030288423,0.00018263383,0.00029171153,0.07353479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207664,0.000046586454,0.0034613484,0.000042878182,0.00003193293,0.000037082325,0.000018113842,0.000010740555,0.0042746835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845755,0.0006629752,0.00004102212,0.00025220233,0.00023326658,0.00035289294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950434,0.0023262394,0.0008622405,0.0005255823,0.000520702,0.0007217589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036514872,0.00052820664,0.00064369943,0.0007636692,0.00077929924,0.002307472,0.001327191,0.0013374061,0.010147223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009424272,0.0004889181,0.0007254301,0.00050682866,0.0021911727,0.0031741338,0.0011458101,0.0017823101,0.0009117706],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016159884,0.0013661169,0.018424636,0.00016705849,0.00008202508,0.00044426275,0.0013350646,0.3152175,0.005987067,0.61418843,0.0024167777,0.03875517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022879054,0.00048011992,0.010190301,0.000028975654,0.00007535535,0.00012305184,0.00034877143,0.7746749,0.00065198116,0.21091032,0.0022263743,0.000061108716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006273171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039506424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010147223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001956786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015323586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0339458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}