{"meta":{"query_hash":"ae59bc868ce7","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Controversial Ideas"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ae59bc868ce7","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Controversial+Ideas"},"results":[{"id":"W4225136396","doi":"10.35995/jci02010007","title":"Figleaves Right and Left: A Case-Study of Viewpoint Diversity Applied to the Philosophy of Language","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Controversial Ideas","topic":"Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Politics; Epistemology; Social science; Sociology; Statement (logic); Public relations; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Anthropology","score_opus":0.031485674297283585,"score_gpt":0.24885086865458853,"score_spread":0.21736519435730495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225136396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86849266,0.0010575319,0.014441122,0.01778071,0.00029716536,0.000089462344,0.00007808404,0.000064251566,0.097699106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98912024,0.00031266414,0.0031553034,0.0011800046,0.000047627982,0.00004927783,0.000022554881,0.00006722158,0.0060451506],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833482,0.013828036,0.00023100208,0.0008181491,0.00092607085,0.00084850006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97756755,0.01791417,0.001328762,0.001409202,0.00063126633,0.0011490444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010484337,0.000835874,0.0008265864,0.0018491554,0.021787787,0.008183152,0.0020518093,0.0074684047,0.006686026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024561819,0.0006081895,0.0008357514,0.0020360674,0.022138365,0.009748599,0.007948361,0.009669381,0.00086344534],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008203812,0.00009031615,0.0036548907,0.00007413732,0.000011008868,0.018168272,0.8496873,0.0001703779,0.0008269682,0.11722862,0.0027374353,0.007268647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034919205,0.0000724068,0.0019297537,0.00028463406,0.00001681518,0.009556496,0.8863012,0.0010996632,0.0009361392,0.028130027,0.07158449,0.00005340786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01026013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022109248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021787787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004045975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022473328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05544716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308415793","doi":"10.35995/jci02020004","title":"Will Moralization of Science Lead to “Better” Science?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Controversial Ideas","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Harassment; Political science; Foundation (evidence); Psychology; Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.04857680857281557,"score_gpt":0.4730880520497666,"score_spread":0.424511243476951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308415793","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046005834,0.0033984324,0.010196805,0.78562057,0.0032355767,0.00006524386,0.00003511351,0.00004567483,0.15139675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89047,0.0027346872,0.0058510657,0.088665746,0.0026399833,0.000109458975,0.000034375258,0.00007754789,0.009417093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9450229,0.0379653,0.0011004999,0.0030322627,0.008412159,0.004466795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9081272,0.04389498,0.016475247,0.009834512,0.012824604,0.008843527],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049847223,0.00032029735,0.00053242745,0.0014041768,0.008248773,0.016183183,0.0016334824,0.012168732,0.005690125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11155198,0.0003623316,0.0010172006,0.0014199006,0.074765846,0.013601297,0.0065308907,0.01795783,0.0013367923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024455567,0.00006952943,0.0023568647,0.00008048444,0.000015745716,0.00009520946,0.0082592,0.00014214418,0.00020269399,0.97131586,0.008831887,0.008606004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033439603,0.00008449668,0.0044623357,0.00028875287,0.000015037404,0.0002076612,0.0107122045,0.00044216804,0.0006338388,0.8315513,0.15151712,0.000051692787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002730725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022758315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99175125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008349842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013175726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2636205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412070501","doi":"10.63466/jci05010002","title":"How Ideology, Not Science, Determined Teaching Children to Read in Ontario","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Controversial Ideas","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Ideology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.035164743862754276,"score_gpt":0.35819915858947765,"score_spread":0.3230344147267234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412070501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9519327,0.0003198616,0.00022469851,0.0036013855,0.000024351639,0.00003174693,0.00013892472,0.000012883669,0.043713458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894049,0.00033173524,0.00026129966,0.0002642434,0.0000064209457,0.00001743426,0.000049207043,0.000014247665,0.00965053],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968485,0.00057951146,0.00008149442,0.00029368995,0.0009922392,0.0012045031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99537426,0.0013650137,0.00085130293,0.00019866014,0.0010891149,0.0011217194],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022692147,0.00019221613,0.0002731312,0.0007944309,0.008432978,0.003100988,0.0008253983,0.00068539014,0.0032543903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071176663,0.00030967733,0.00025660367,0.0014066208,0.0054073003,0.0013736626,0.0031585654,0.0014352252,0.00032547585],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026380873,0.00018068115,0.18842359,0.00021523333,0.000023019344,0.0014890921,0.7172246,0.00030313566,0.0029972962,0.02585966,0.008594316,0.054425556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046311172,0.00013803829,0.42756078,0.00033476946,0.00006352926,0.0002281297,0.41259417,0.0005203034,0.002150393,0.0036684205,0.15262197,0.00007307056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96810067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99264103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083631076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08715933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60678875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}