{"meta":{"query_hash":"a3cf83f62d3a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a3cf83f62d3a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Copyright+in+Education+%26+Librarianship"},"results":[{"id":"W2623314048","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v2i1.7159","title":"Teaching an Invisible Subject: How are we Educating Faculty about Copyright?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Copyright law; Public relations; Subject (documents); Political science; Higher education; Copyright Act; Action (physics); Intellectual property; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09987179628539973,"score_gpt":0.42056405526098806,"score_spread":0.32069225897558834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623314048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1229215,0.01193646,0.004038194,0.82017446,0.002582423,0.00015760664,0.000059793416,0.00023189135,0.037897743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.909035,0.011683481,0.0043723583,0.06080912,0.0011428442,0.00018980709,0.000060273265,0.00013927273,0.01256787],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.961828,0.021146253,0.0009190144,0.0018104191,0.0071513997,0.007144958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86115354,0.054241817,0.012028199,0.006068084,0.021382373,0.04512602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047091953,0.0004262485,0.0008254404,0.0029624652,0.028122516,0.037381414,0.0033523522,0.008017935,0.01019535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15984496,0.00053020014,0.00067625975,0.003566606,0.031504415,0.03414866,0.014062504,0.010724654,0.0019227766],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008770561,0.00068188953,0.04217138,0.0009175376,0.00005829718,0.00040321518,0.47964668,0.00017525704,0.0007127529,0.03898395,0.08838673,0.34777462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045135443,0.00026727648,0.01891406,0.0028308048,0.000091495596,0.00023921841,0.64389324,0.00027043247,0.0010564369,0.031648528,0.30060947,0.00013395539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06047758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.093281925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06047758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028017212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0779212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24904901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921953549","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v3i1.7697","title":"A Pilot Study of Fan Fiction Writer’s Legal Information Behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal writing; Subject (documents); Legal fiction; Work (physics); Political science; Law; Media studies; Advertising; Public relations; Sociology; Legal research; Engineering; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.028243916895026352,"score_gpt":0.30662598195901386,"score_spread":0.2783820650639875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921953549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99469405,0.000016732125,0.0001604971,0.00012960022,0.000020474898,0.00079663965,0.00020653823,0.000016432034,0.003959095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825884,0.00010499633,0.0021454925,0.00035628027,0.000030187077,0.0016123776,0.0004314084,0.00001044981,0.0127202105],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859947,0.00046103168,0.00006291158,0.00018071332,0.000299136,0.00039683102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893845,0.0035592539,0.00059373135,0.000619802,0.0035825782,0.0022602642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040748315,0.0004220576,0.0004287145,0.001330877,0.005497358,0.0014148395,0.0006382944,0.00068212155,0.007073511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008509524,0.0004111849,0.0002836553,0.0006398668,0.0013706341,0.00079374464,0.00070713845,0.0015043955,0.0011144244],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001238313,0.042684253,0.37197158,0.00030756116,0.00004390841,0.0017654131,0.4506024,0.00017998842,0.006134337,0.0015377492,0.013050271,0.11048426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035130544,0.017689124,0.6407359,0.00016805851,0.00005495771,0.00048577983,0.30037037,0.0009189078,0.0038228154,0.0005916622,0.03466451,0.0001465761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14958696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28974476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14958696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034885427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006321498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29743254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030755369","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v5i1.15212","title":"Introducing the Copyright Anxiety Scale","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Alberta Museum; Alberta Library; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anxiety; Software deployment; Scale (ratio); Copyright law; Psychology; Political science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Law; Intellectual property; Geography; Psychiatry; Cartography","score_opus":0.015536838364937708,"score_gpt":0.22356648266455662,"score_spread":0.2080296442996189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030755369","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8044403,0.0024611782,0.036505952,0.010434741,0.0019313433,0.031021463,0.008530495,0.0009563072,0.10371816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72372544,0.0061619137,0.16776016,0.0053848494,0.00072617445,0.052855063,0.008138879,0.00023625669,0.03501125],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963865,0.0012011117,0.000566935,0.0001881477,0.0013505331,0.0003067447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99075633,0.0042540287,0.0008150729,0.00051684724,0.0029584283,0.00069927896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059451708,0.00045111537,0.0005168481,0.0012953188,0.0010645397,0.0020339661,0.0007407513,0.0006664968,0.0057684206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013141384,0.0004975145,0.0010646168,0.00090945704,0.0004888298,0.0012529572,0.0023995577,0.00272466,0.001516207],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035715962,0.004095281,0.20261705,0.001011545,0.00022692846,0.00037070888,0.016489185,0.0010419727,0.0037929232,0.01078703,0.07555617,0.68365407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050852355,0.002471473,0.63615584,0.0012318349,0.00024031103,0.0008952205,0.013779114,0.0035345426,0.0032389162,0.014056093,0.32345486,0.00043329687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035759367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011192888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059451708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014164338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034929498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03144145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196914484","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v5i1.14920","title":"Canadian Collaborations: Library Communications and Advocacy in the time of COVID-19","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University; University of Calgary; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Face (sociological concept); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Digital library; Public relations; World Wide Web; Position (finance); Copyright law; Business; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Internet privacy; Intellectual property; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.048099236507286605,"score_gpt":0.34049955520091046,"score_spread":0.2924003186936239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196914484","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016511666,0.018061345,0.0004239391,0.80097944,0.0065028453,0.00010670057,0.0004236453,0.00013313325,0.15685727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51805514,0.026792819,0.002867284,0.24163999,0.0025805177,0.00024232508,0.00057376426,0.00027223342,0.20697597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98088753,0.003006692,0.00043488294,0.0008469712,0.0074467743,0.0073772087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9446926,0.006186001,0.0015846873,0.00090704183,0.012867975,0.033761665],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013208296,0.00070791587,0.0008426629,0.0035153164,0.07281437,0.018136159,0.003780291,0.011526205,0.029090151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034354337,0.00064106804,0.00072419434,0.007839249,0.01624454,0.006661755,0.0153431725,0.011734986,0.0021676186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007036327,0.00005608367,0.0034030925,0.0003682553,0.00003090935,0.001518508,0.05454905,0.00014388356,0.00021816189,0.06794001,0.80222017,0.06948157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016110194,0.000015512936,0.0034276794,0.00028441497,0.000012727221,0.00017073567,0.048481263,0.000072774026,0.000067324676,0.0029062359,0.9444914,0.00005380394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.986464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9939413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98186386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22487023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5235277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89904064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281485168","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v5i1.15513","title":"Canada’s Copyright Act Review: Implications for Fair Dealing and Higher Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries; Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Statutory law; Stakeholder; Political science; Publishing; Public administration; Public relations; Higher education; Law","score_opus":0.033657038968516996,"score_gpt":0.2590215442468609,"score_spread":0.22536450527834392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281485168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002246491,0.016456246,0.0008863516,0.9400251,0.010215314,0.00013194648,0.00031891183,0.00009195287,0.029627698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1413959,0.043508157,0.009025932,0.74433637,0.0082348995,0.0004503196,0.0008233054,0.00030075063,0.051924445],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8070612,0.027165702,0.008312066,0.007385125,0.12103798,0.02903791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49106833,0.18501358,0.01343487,0.009923946,0.254572,0.04598721],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13565323,0.001165405,0.0020468496,0.013269067,0.03701199,0.041426137,0.009551646,0.028959597,0.008050758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32764244,0.0011282165,0.0025954084,0.015974721,0.04046606,0.013481086,0.008519085,0.024142288,0.0013716206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048650025,0.00005330772,0.0018009965,0.0009097021,0.00005830953,0.00034943107,0.0040444355,0.0005326902,0.00015375428,0.19411556,0.7502518,0.047681294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005028497,0.000036405352,0.005815606,0.0030481087,0.00007694161,0.00011012741,0.008129914,0.0005336023,0.00027524304,0.02864706,0.9530644,0.00021236643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9722916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9585739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27346587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.752505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84267664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295836100","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v6i1.18490","title":"From Novice to Expert: Building Copyright Expertise Over Time","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Position (finance); Set (abstract data type); Subject matter; Public relations; Copyright law; Political science; Subject (documents); Professional development; Sociology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Business; Library science; Curriculum; Intellectual property; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.01821892239389378,"score_gpt":0.2514504712705103,"score_spread":0.2332315488766165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295836100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77225405,0.0030080962,0.013939773,0.029380383,0.0013386521,0.0002737122,0.00014756987,0.0005812391,0.17907646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560891,0.0012262833,0.009199862,0.0056704744,0.00032630778,0.00011218446,0.00014238103,0.00013238455,0.02710102],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915104,0.0023272631,0.0004133537,0.001112178,0.003196097,0.0014408369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94510275,0.012576486,0.0033481035,0.004645124,0.012302808,0.022024784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013683395,0.000317758,0.00040000243,0.003399813,0.0046706726,0.010531108,0.0020461017,0.002209529,0.013017489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04980776,0.00041468994,0.00048151452,0.0009491516,0.0037482418,0.015027101,0.012246639,0.0030385545,0.003556554],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020329689,0.0019013055,0.098161235,0.0004739442,0.00008556282,0.0033267764,0.13061379,0.00062317273,0.006322114,0.0146688325,0.06742927,0.6761907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008224871,0.0025472103,0.2336197,0.0017840392,0.00013896987,0.010275798,0.31055152,0.0042890506,0.006683283,0.06748686,0.36207584,0.00046541556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002473798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065973178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013683395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022249066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051623727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07236558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363415","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23053","title":"Building Open Education Capacity: Introducing the Canadian Code of Best Practices in Fair Dealing for Open Educational Resources","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph; University of Calgary; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Open educational resources; Open education; Capacity building; Code (set theory); Code of practice; Best practice; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; World Wide Web; Programming language; Law; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.07329699150697462,"score_gpt":0.37634848937474336,"score_spread":0.30305149786776875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012083168,0.004361395,0.2174231,0.32842386,0.0065463586,0.002831623,0.00067537493,0.001524766,0.42613026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3230758,0.006771956,0.48725787,0.063461944,0.0016050413,0.0026493503,0.000713633,0.0018857098,0.11257876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8621051,0.032575473,0.0063018203,0.007027966,0.07967174,0.012318031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8321936,0.061473798,0.0041349046,0.013068179,0.07799088,0.011138655],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08872721,0.0013503709,0.0010117231,0.010341389,0.035106216,0.03350588,0.0077577834,0.019459246,0.005579285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14558642,0.0016665007,0.0017567682,0.009565781,0.06741241,0.01475085,0.018730087,0.021838691,0.0018948574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014934579,0.000044424538,0.00079898123,0.00018443441,0.000008323713,0.00040858865,0.023102846,0.0015637341,0.000360988,0.84478265,0.087176464,0.041553676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017721068,0.000024940096,0.0016570076,0.0012263957,0.0000133612275,0.00022846181,0.011302403,0.0022499184,0.0005582751,0.10853518,0.8738929,0.0002934801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9116137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9380148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17424478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.43857095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.957759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363450","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23131","title":"On Copyright, Social Policy, and Libraries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Business; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.018958951237438952,"score_gpt":0.25928727071846264,"score_spread":0.24032831948102368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013959007,0.023561679,0.0007998523,0.28468072,0.0005951006,0.000027066164,0.00006262526,0.000036125148,0.6762778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7458537,0.038845107,0.0012678053,0.0745478,0.0022060063,0.00011848915,0.0000753188,0.00006848013,0.13701722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98982424,0.004395098,0.00025341404,0.0004920164,0.0026283953,0.002406828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98442245,0.010769489,0.00072885473,0.0005519099,0.002126767,0.0014005566],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00821409,0.00042254291,0.0004705478,0.0036573368,0.021936648,0.018885689,0.0014298299,0.0084511675,0.01620427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015510447,0.00018908984,0.00037732537,0.00581186,0.0473212,0.00950287,0.0076514008,0.0040914044,0.0009527866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072027156,0.000018179711,0.00035473437,0.000046842,0.0000033475555,0.000047869664,0.002887465,0.0001446602,0.000026867203,0.9718384,0.014597078,0.010027317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017843162,0.000034927954,0.0029773328,0.00091084786,0.000019239666,0.00006560819,0.0174968,0.0003017246,0.00022817978,0.42841718,0.5494804,0.000049861843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42128614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4846155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9811143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045055646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070824124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83766794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363474","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23060","title":"Assessing the use of Canadian Literature in teaching at Simon Fraser University","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Canadian literature; Mathematics education; Psychology; Media studies; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.07538130013265744,"score_gpt":0.29185006217238363,"score_spread":0.2164687620397262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9035771,0.0031165378,0.000482665,0.0037611302,0.00008901954,0.00010478577,0.0010299009,0.00008583677,0.08775324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980393,0.0030851401,0.0011639,0.00048626898,0.00003223922,0.00003674321,0.00056989864,0.000053391555,0.014179327],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98707414,0.00124798,0.00047776752,0.0006587547,0.009467315,0.001074069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96075386,0.0065953406,0.0056748297,0.0011847585,0.019604085,0.006187022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008247226,0.00039094882,0.00042663506,0.019815717,0.011602222,0.008154714,0.0018185673,0.0008200505,0.0061303414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036327858,0.00038610096,0.0003035696,0.020214107,0.005377764,0.0024003477,0.0037020838,0.0009914757,0.0010342987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016643263,0.00022004175,0.35095245,0.000929842,0.00009244533,0.0012305595,0.35478416,0.00040210568,0.002821103,0.0103490595,0.02220529,0.25584653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010565472,0.00010477458,0.6688866,0.00079390843,0.00005682323,0.00055894034,0.18544069,0.0004125721,0.0014540748,0.00068402087,0.14147954,0.00011749537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9249166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9778631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075083375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06747271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48955107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363481","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23058","title":"Copyright Anxiety and Legal Chill in Higher Education: A Comparison of Canada and the United Kingdom (UK)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Alberta","keywords":"Kingdom; Anxiety; Legal education; Political science; Media studies; Psychology; Economic history; History; Law; Sociology; Psychiatry; Geology","score_opus":0.03164746713493082,"score_gpt":0.25784651213774035,"score_spread":0.22619904500280952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916495,0.0012246367,0.000050335686,0.0010196323,0.000037600945,0.00003383325,0.0004129363,0.0000046695163,0.0055667968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780244,0.0006950063,0.00005049243,0.00032593447,0.000010617868,0.0000145766835,0.00020745177,0.000004998817,0.00088838034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99633706,0.0002987171,0.00023192228,0.00026722773,0.0013307302,0.0015342926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874248,0.0014226619,0.0022091777,0.00020089092,0.0047288523,0.0040136194],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018041561,0.00032563694,0.0007252441,0.0047659036,0.0064225467,0.0051148552,0.0011709649,0.000838923,0.0040623825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009087888,0.00032390986,0.0006860858,0.011938037,0.0026510328,0.0015503612,0.002967392,0.0013537317,0.0003093014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030528413,0.00026076203,0.9046674,0.00026388915,0.00008352486,0.00073343975,0.051222373,0.000108577355,0.00032293607,0.0015214271,0.003285026,0.037225302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016371716,0.00006310911,0.93341315,0.00016996777,0.00002365635,0.00015504398,0.062056147,0.00008834579,0.00007741963,0.00006617248,0.0038354055,0.00003523095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9865254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99488515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045657728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048054338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33127153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413408880","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23195","title":"Risk, Reality, Regulations? Finding what’s reasonable in copyright guidance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science","score_opus":0.032570634283916725,"score_gpt":0.27943500129000626,"score_spread":0.24686436700608955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413408880","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13686535,0.008136899,0.05432172,0.46377787,0.00079640804,0.0005858467,0.00013885039,0.0001773654,0.33519977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642793,0.0014685319,0.0146099,0.014253488,0.0002485494,0.00027490588,0.0000557104,0.000049462655,0.0047602104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8840472,0.06293709,0.007968992,0.0067704064,0.029523827,0.008752412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90591997,0.061401073,0.011087808,0.009071323,0.0095401015,0.0029796474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08400131,0.00067784416,0.0014454225,0.0046319533,0.018516356,0.03198145,0.0049184645,0.02078441,0.003821578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13964427,0.0009009127,0.0024434647,0.0037863513,0.08999219,0.03455958,0.010605185,0.015087593,0.0007793702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012425312,0.000044649656,0.0013498764,0.0000804489,0.000015221793,0.0007642219,0.017742775,0.00036237965,0.00010519828,0.9719348,0.001612023,0.0059760576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024432456,0.00006118856,0.0015703355,0.0010113784,0.000035284043,0.0008941501,0.053872216,0.001051258,0.00051756797,0.8821665,0.058683448,0.00011211898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022724587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015643017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08400131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018261163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027026726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4442467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413769924","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23786","title":"Educational Copying – the “Very Antithesis of Fair Dealing” or Within Copyright’s “Breathing Space”? Part 1: Statutory Provisions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Antithesis; Statutory law; Space (punctuation); Fair use; Law; Statutory interpretation; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.0310898496594315,"score_gpt":0.2647571683806649,"score_spread":0.23366731872123336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413769924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16435105,0.0068943235,0.021229373,0.10898977,0.0011797791,0.0001993364,0.00017250568,0.00014787722,0.69683594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629814,0.001721321,0.0034425696,0.008404479,0.00071715895,0.000073387855,0.000060308044,0.00004613979,0.022553232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833255,0.0048988066,0.0009591328,0.0009447222,0.008025775,0.0018461376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9716723,0.017039511,0.0031086346,0.003950217,0.0034286235,0.0008007425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009859306,0.00023194081,0.00037539942,0.0020526687,0.0047676344,0.012483725,0.0015969101,0.0046566636,0.0049831304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041974537,0.0003588228,0.0004194565,0.0027974665,0.041537687,0.013058065,0.003837329,0.0048732134,0.0006544611],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000097805905,0.000019914612,0.0022283134,0.000035834102,0.0000031158975,0.000082740655,0.0044756336,0.00015667672,0.00023110423,0.9761514,0.0043359455,0.012269524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019385168,0.00009334184,0.015675817,0.0011029822,0.000032189273,0.00054291356,0.025835313,0.0013290143,0.0022507852,0.66889596,0.28413248,0.000089805624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020739786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022862777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020739786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005160769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010428835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052141607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416023714","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23101","title":"Legislating Open Access: Making the Case for a Secondary Publishing Right in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Work (physics); Public access; Path (computing); Compliance (psychology); Human rights","score_opus":0.5186037205800953,"score_gpt":0.5866201866187247,"score_spread":0.06801646603862943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416023714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22520764,0.0034871697,0.009925281,0.31980014,0.0008938454,0.00037727054,0.0005890778,0.00018227125,0.43953738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9208433,0.0013721543,0.005030779,0.029573567,0.00020361991,0.000105048006,0.00015772221,0.00008635535,0.04262736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96373826,0.0052759508,0.0012526142,0.0032971976,0.016774278,0.009661717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89488566,0.03272784,0.004112963,0.006222311,0.040819444,0.021231726],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025629504,0.00024083453,0.00061672286,0.002535384,0.01863271,0.018107694,0.0030216172,0.0056568957,0.005506098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06957693,0.00047762413,0.00070444826,0.0040164213,0.017357918,0.0064383154,0.0073794383,0.007105344,0.0004083262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111854686,0.00008526848,0.016755674,0.00020596568,0.000051774852,0.00067188573,0.019169481,0.00096741813,0.001400767,0.85909003,0.038011376,0.063478425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019343867,0.000103096565,0.04082321,0.0010934504,0.00015922822,0.00031650823,0.024808658,0.0029328896,0.002594109,0.15079229,0.775887,0.00029617955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9707143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97994554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11495379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3693517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8340521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416023736","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23510","title":"The Practitioners’ Guide to Using the Copyright Act of Canada to Make Accessible Content for People with Print Disabilities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"Universiti Teknologi MARA; International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Section (typography); Copyright Act","score_opus":0.041814091094361634,"score_gpt":0.35365616510368064,"score_spread":0.311842074009319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416023736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035992688,0.01919518,0.04918488,0.20832033,0.005439481,0.005176471,0.0055221715,0.0016087978,0.70195335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048284657,0.042094335,0.28899598,0.07896592,0.0005995119,0.003621919,0.0037062443,0.0011966642,0.5325347],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97175276,0.00542821,0.0018589448,0.0007623399,0.018169528,0.0020281929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94800717,0.009911989,0.0011691602,0.0013220957,0.03650167,0.0030879609],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017425738,0.0009907377,0.00070257403,0.007913814,0.014980878,0.0075733587,0.003442369,0.00833406,0.02012823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042296518,0.0013007079,0.00076081994,0.009907666,0.008562353,0.004462862,0.0036787817,0.008715552,0.008835149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013154145,0.000070645045,0.0006713603,0.00030642067,0.0000041958415,0.00037294006,0.013963151,0.00041477932,0.0005987828,0.056218714,0.83427626,0.09308956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051744014,0.000007651158,0.000585543,0.00044455685,0.0000026393423,0.000099124016,0.0027803162,0.0000930969,0.00008693316,0.0023186996,0.9935364,0.00003978963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92206234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9716063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99242663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04899436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32919264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35548067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416023739","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23066","title":"Walking the Talk: Establishing Best Practices for Attributing and Licensing Employee-Created Works","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Presentation (obstetrics); Creativity; Intellectual property; Subject (documents); Social media","score_opus":0.05593591090750913,"score_gpt":0.30376564877584616,"score_spread":0.24782973786833704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416023739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42186487,0.0049399226,0.3628229,0.08234622,0.0006345183,0.007414387,0.00016508784,0.0040700007,0.11574205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64995414,0.0018233601,0.3343517,0.0023250578,0.00010103357,0.002260146,0.00012087039,0.00045409537,0.008609588],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7630845,0.16783263,0.015551421,0.010087182,0.035704024,0.0077403556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6471378,0.20330566,0.025530318,0.056331426,0.05714904,0.010545782],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2635803,0.000851594,0.00070585986,0.012167591,0.018116865,0.032380886,0.009927894,0.007143763,0.0027342713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30372822,0.0020125743,0.000953374,0.0065041124,0.02462393,0.027304491,0.020722536,0.008568812,0.0017959824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006768459,0.0008997242,0.014621174,0.0010837,0.000045028188,0.00073406013,0.5031361,0.0012553666,0.0029720974,0.03735234,0.008201009,0.42963174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104561026,0.0008443495,0.020849664,0.007974796,0.00016936101,0.0011246849,0.6450967,0.005849679,0.0152645735,0.05671008,0.24548651,0.000524986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023418058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033234276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9676191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023956459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07754858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9081366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104400596","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v9i1.23096","title":"The Fair Dealing Exception Explained: A 20 Year Retrospective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University; York University; University of Windsor","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Fair dealing; Reading (process); Fair use; Supreme court; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.01316047035014522,"score_gpt":0.2389287954486043,"score_spread":0.22576832509845907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104400596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62296176,0.03063967,0.0038761587,0.04201532,0.0019591893,0.0013348513,0.02268568,0.00034431388,0.27418312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7831784,0.03849458,0.0010177882,0.021513263,0.0012981279,0.0010937318,0.013121792,0.00042627976,0.13985606],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99011713,0.0015342261,0.0007028149,0.0009152767,0.0045295465,0.002201028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538208,0.016093109,0.008021416,0.0039182,0.01501592,0.0031305356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011361821,0.00033164045,0.0005349916,0.009924416,0.011943518,0.007074948,0.0019654077,0.0027621961,0.0076071545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05575369,0.0010403433,0.00053826335,0.016482454,0.0051412205,0.005041483,0.005226647,0.0070126457,0.0025213007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003067913,0.00081980694,0.22712673,0.0007076741,0.0000611736,0.01628445,0.22441353,0.00030994014,0.00049658737,0.06446961,0.29987124,0.16513248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007528199,0.00008338216,0.19487979,0.0011790458,0.00005612853,0.002667476,0.061955325,0.00015024298,0.00047075102,0.0021671695,0.7362719,0.00011118846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44012278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48192638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44012278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016133545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028515995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87512195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}