{"meta":{"query_hash":"a3cf83f62d3a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a3cf83f62d3a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Copyright+in+Education+%26+Librarianship"},"results":[{"id":"W2623314048","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v2i1.7159","title":"Teaching an Invisible Subject: How are we Educating Faculty about Copyright?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Simon Fraser University","keywords":"Copyright law; Public relations; Subject (documents); Political science; Higher education; Copyright Act; Action (physics); Intellectual property; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.09987179628539973,"score_gpt":0.42056405526098806,"score_spread":0.32069225897558834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623314048","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3351678,0.0006741387,0.0004884913,0.4555235,0.010673097,0.00044959888,0.000012080989,0.000087863904,0.19692345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679482,0.000113564565,0.01038054,0.00322756,0.007603769,0.000019385441,0.000023914436,0.000033745968,0.0106492955],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646586,0.0012241033,0.00084201695,0.00028914362,0.0007219974,0.0004568498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959572,0.0006100202,0.0015869426,0.00035185483,0.0010600874,0.00043391733],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032419453,0.0002196467,0.0003308653,0.0008672107,0.0012332273,0.0016371721,0.0008751515,0.00023333235,0.0019028239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024280378,0.00020030359,0.00010647632,0.0015464864,0.0003257147,0.009534072,0.000027925906,0.0013752424,0.0000658946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106714404,0.0021321469,0.054635227,0.00005804431,0.00005146574,0.0000047306953,0.23339768,0.0000040877067,0.00027327865,0.3107617,0.36475554,0.03381939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031538276,0.00012033569,0.025519215,0.00029709953,0.000028809513,0.000025210762,0.09298919,0.000025867717,0.00034997487,0.027036339,0.85301954,0.00027306043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019272321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018890102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63278043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040237623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009834605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921953549","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v3i1.7697","title":"A Pilot Study of Fan Fiction Writer’s Legal Information Behavior","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal writing; Subject (documents); Legal fiction; Work (physics); Political science; Law; Media studies; Advertising; Public relations; Sociology; Legal research; Engineering; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.028243916895026352,"score_gpt":0.30662598195901386,"score_spread":0.2783820650639875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921953549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8528521,0.000054705415,0.000018176897,0.00055106793,0.0028562865,0.00039991626,0.00000196232,0.000008069656,0.1432577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995378,0.000024643827,0.00018247288,0.00012074555,0.00032157253,0.00001137654,0.000005345138,0.000005667969,0.003950181],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985099,0.00014938111,0.0006472576,0.00006533897,0.00048764603,0.00014048668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885637,0.00010170293,0.00057822675,0.00012453998,0.00022281388,0.0001163416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006288003,0.00007665208,0.00018762697,0.00039555438,0.000034475856,0.0002571286,0.00027363005,0.000040947943,0.00039510394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014562171,0.000067671346,0.000048528254,0.0004269118,0.00004026995,0.005667696,0.000013226121,0.00019738369,0.000024107418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007074305,0.011500042,0.57614464,0.00009455591,0.000051979845,0.000005778995,0.1647466,0.000039674727,0.00033015225,0.049965587,0.02555872,0.17085487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014764599,0.002878335,0.5041292,0.0001853918,0.00004581731,0.000009859995,0.09550153,0.000006961141,0.00012803309,0.00081267837,0.39465523,0.00017054366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003708206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023025411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36909652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010108967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011992255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4326111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3030755369","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v5i1.15212","title":"Introducing the Copyright Anxiety Scale","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Alberta Museum; Alberta Library; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Anxiety; Software deployment; Scale (ratio); Copyright law; Psychology; Political science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Law; Intellectual property; Geography; Psychiatry; Cartography","score_opus":0.015536838364937708,"score_gpt":0.22356648266455662,"score_spread":0.2080296442996189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3030755369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35163954,0.008323357,0.0011727107,0.08152889,0.014014655,0.00051047595,0.00000233443,0.000090122485,0.54271793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786582,0.00024352194,0.0011277839,0.007542055,0.008087975,0.000009897164,0.000016078884,0.000038837286,0.0042756484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997989,0.00009664209,0.0008636678,0.0002770846,0.0004520376,0.00032157573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803275,0.00017698211,0.00056807,0.00043940902,0.0007430059,0.00003981026],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000976263,0.00022208337,0.00034661664,0.00040144983,0.0002702866,0.0010723699,0.000688543,0.00011508981,0.01157328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058373,0.0001364422,0.0002018545,0.001443246,0.000105048726,0.0040490767,0.0001224258,0.00066438364,0.00027788946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017164375,0.0006089342,0.016406028,0.00010743632,0.00004491416,0.000012410444,0.0010745374,0.000026232652,0.0011289853,0.014135909,0.93916374,0.027119221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005162261,0.000019174468,0.014407806,0.00022163725,0.000064925924,0.00009830933,0.0015411584,0.0018142032,0.0036601457,0.031788696,0.94561094,0.00025676048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008569076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000095518786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62701863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009526106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009197613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196914484","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v5i1.14920","title":"Canadian Collaborations: Library Communications and Advocacy in the time of COVID-19","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Toronto; Toronto Metropolitan University; Queen's University; University of Calgary; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Face (sociological concept); Pandemic; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Digital library; Public relations; World Wide Web; Position (finance); Copyright law; Business; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political science; Internet privacy; Intellectual property; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.048099236507286605,"score_gpt":0.34049955520091046,"score_spread":0.2924003186936239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196914484","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24332345,0.0045747804,0.00002388506,0.6541672,0.00049893494,0.00037106904,0.000022813025,0.00001059315,0.09700728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881997,0.0012982866,0.002441428,0.006274263,0.00018014396,0.000008345867,0.000034026405,0.000005276716,0.0015585022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980521,0.0009613413,0.00048423317,0.00009413786,0.00026074285,0.00014742647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834895,0.0007466568,0.00027232518,0.00026400102,0.00010181613,0.00026622007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010574508,0.000062757994,0.00013774991,0.0003673582,0.00028518002,0.00035212407,0.00069241686,0.00007960744,0.00071070733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006840984,0.000051905976,0.000031936794,0.0018933392,0.00024982955,0.0036017064,0.000022758322,0.00020448657,0.0000051255392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029829594,0.0005734922,0.2393711,0.000035297908,0.000011629631,0.000027139224,0.14661437,0.000015927635,0.000111269095,0.51849735,0.09202374,0.0026888358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035760406,0.00007037206,0.06614903,0.00010948883,0.000013176996,0.000030275909,0.12093316,0.000051006296,0.00014942976,0.10861204,0.7033921,0.00013233496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058198944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041082963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74487627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000937496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042909957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9764148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281485168","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v5i1.15513","title":"Canada’s Copyright Act Review: Implications for Fair Dealing and Higher Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Association of Research Libraries; Association of Research Libraries","keywords":"Statutory law; Stakeholder; Political science; Publishing; Public administration; Public relations; Higher education; Law","score_opus":0.033657038968516996,"score_gpt":0.2590215442468609,"score_spread":0.22536450527834392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281485168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03880286,0.093062416,0.00054039364,0.5889875,0.019368615,0.003869746,0.00006343013,0.00011417,0.25519082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9606333,0.0005725976,0.0006264024,0.030300286,0.0025197167,0.00022000952,0.00011072557,0.000045818877,0.0049711885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829894,0.000060044913,0.0008323672,0.00025121757,0.00029862224,0.00025880503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824077,0.00021654932,0.00077899435,0.00025166356,0.00045639672,0.000055618228],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006704524,0.00020172074,0.0003492324,0.00047907195,0.0004284639,0.00027625685,0.0005129421,0.00004936516,0.004959717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021473358,0.00016814834,0.00010324024,0.0007300933,0.000035950103,0.002079154,0.00009456545,0.000376316,0.0000062331987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082086495,0.00026339348,0.0030853858,0.0003778124,0.000019909618,5.3792775e-7,0.00007333608,0.0000044796766,0.00006783023,0.028958961,0.9537073,0.013359004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032668273,0.00003293438,0.026109908,0.00030509263,0.00007854711,0.000023530734,0.0002247643,0.00014400516,0.000030896594,0.028067816,0.94443476,0.00022108384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01632098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053040036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9218304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003422664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005250224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99594986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295836100","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v6i1.18490","title":"From Novice to Expert: Building Copyright Expertise Over Time","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Graduation (instrument); Position (finance); Set (abstract data type); Subject matter; Public relations; Copyright law; Political science; Subject (documents); Professional development; Sociology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Business; Library science; Curriculum; Intellectual property; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.01821892239389378,"score_gpt":0.2514504712705103,"score_spread":0.2332315488766165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295836100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87826806,0.0029715258,0.0009236623,0.020748211,0.0086470805,0.00070690707,0.000013056185,0.000121176556,0.08760029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722171,0.00001635059,0.0016658121,0.01645424,0.006655619,0.000062093524,0.000032289077,0.00007125465,0.0028252595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733704,0.0001044238,0.0010162374,0.00038508998,0.0007531599,0.00040404213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998421,0.0002245033,0.00062358496,0.00038811937,0.00025153437,0.00009123197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063740823,0.00030576278,0.00046750205,0.0012197345,0.00037329365,0.00073787855,0.0011102578,0.00008901262,0.07728405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029691504,0.00025375947,0.0001932665,0.0014736927,0.00004242884,0.004252022,0.000326724,0.00061341404,0.0005349701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068180915,0.000751958,0.0012761822,0.000020633817,0.000042473137,0.00002613695,0.003380575,0.00006772192,0.008691574,0.0020612143,0.9724562,0.010543502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00090592296,0.00009121842,0.0033763493,0.0001641923,0.000035544,0.000019147887,0.0011910491,0.0056436914,0.0018007328,0.015072443,0.9712169,0.00048280912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009980472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020287176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09394899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035587454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005586372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363415","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23053","title":"Building Open Education Capacity: Introducing the Canadian Code of Best Practices in Fair Dealing for Open Educational Resources","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Open Education and E-Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Guelph; University of Calgary; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Open educational resources; Open education; Capacity building; Code (set theory); Code of practice; Best practice; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; World Wide Web; Programming language; Law; Set (abstract data type)","score_opus":0.07329699150697462,"score_gpt":0.37634848937474336,"score_spread":0.30305149786776875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363415","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3145695,0.002349941,0.0058583217,0.51455593,0.012072244,0.0034527082,0.000012463847,0.000017247943,0.14711162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8922953,0.000035499863,0.10337806,0.0019299343,0.00044212132,0.0001355348,0.000010313062,0.000011871543,0.0017613659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974566,0.00057513267,0.001048068,0.00035238842,0.00027032298,0.00029745518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956093,0.0014134771,0.0017326156,0.00047838382,0.000589541,0.00017669579],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039759837,0.00016306179,0.00034169536,0.0012339228,0.00045612414,0.0026052417,0.004421414,0.00011105894,0.00008904621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002796039,0.00013945096,0.00006389301,0.0017014825,0.00006910689,0.0046841307,0.00027204843,0.0005960146,0.000004292761],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007509637,0.0009271055,0.052751403,0.00010847818,0.00004140447,3.4779944e-7,0.014421998,0.0009050503,0.00016167185,0.87519985,0.030142846,0.025264718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001409277,0.00019833526,0.1207248,0.0025776867,0.000071924136,0.00006642785,0.04087786,0.0023310296,0.001849453,0.2457691,0.58360636,0.00051777175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055116855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054317676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6294308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060245744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026473068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363450","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23131","title":"On Copyright, Social Policy, and Libraries","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Business; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.018958951237438952,"score_gpt":0.25928727071846264,"score_spread":0.24032831948102368,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18039635,0.0014462759,0.000302415,0.050806124,0.0031476743,0.00031752576,0.0000019122187,0.00006440216,0.7635173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97833663,0.000050785304,0.0002321004,0.011553978,0.004022868,0.000008364708,0.000007567202,0.000023376788,0.005764341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985229,0.000049324935,0.00067346985,0.0002134839,0.0002745365,0.00026631728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989343,0.00024900283,0.00040265766,0.00015934791,0.00022429258,0.000030391215],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039295846,0.00022441735,0.00036462865,0.0017159706,0.0002673154,0.0010863576,0.0004446535,0.00014904121,0.0016921578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000613274,0.00016576311,0.00011149847,0.0013089385,0.0001547503,0.003988894,0.00009642025,0.00044163445,0.000062652995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032773268,0.0002677074,0.0014193638,0.000091717295,0.000025547739,0.000003195728,0.0003262072,0.0000010279354,0.00005177331,0.49743158,0.48836696,0.011687189],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073884596,0.000044413235,0.020302895,0.000272436,0.000037031536,0.0000057176658,0.00038845104,0.00043094816,0.0003610147,0.45440802,0.52280414,0.00020607273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014386576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018551349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79794025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008968921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010434004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363474","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23060","title":"Assessing the use of Canadian Literature in teaching at Simon Fraser University","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Canadian literature; Mathematics education; Psychology; Media studies; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.07538130013265744,"score_gpt":0.29185006217238363,"score_spread":0.2164687620397262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7302824,0.0041181482,0.000040091105,0.049568165,0.0024057871,0.00017896164,0.000021018644,0.000006602261,0.21337882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953726,0.00023370465,0.0003792567,0.0007562301,0.00018927648,3.7253852e-7,0.0000051270226,0.0000041387643,0.0030593006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915296,0.0002869954,0.00029903857,0.00006475363,0.00009865752,0.000097596785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988787,0.00063287956,0.0002543505,0.000092668575,0.00010170651,0.000039699175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003727381,0.000068337526,0.00013524941,0.00087343913,0.0002704878,0.00045117817,0.00015837156,0.000046367597,0.00030385755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000654631,0.000048533224,0.000049964532,0.0002956565,0.000059040365,0.0029718615,0.000011257184,0.00040262096,0.0000010988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020168627,0.00032663395,0.28024244,0.00012286597,0.000104453124,0.000025238212,0.09434591,0.00033509292,0.000013009298,0.4238438,0.16858175,0.031857103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001922497,0.000009748291,0.04381506,0.0003250705,0.000019416373,4.4458608e-7,0.01523962,0.0000288313,0.000009825847,0.0018539103,0.93845963,0.000046210393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01238701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23059328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76987785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098402525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006760642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99418956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413363481","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23058","title":"Copyright Anxiety and Legal Chill in Higher Education: A Comparison of Canada and the United Kingdom (UK)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Alberta","keywords":"Kingdom; Anxiety; Legal education; Political science; Media studies; Psychology; Economic history; History; Law; Sociology; Psychiatry; Geology","score_opus":0.03164746713493082,"score_gpt":0.25784651213774035,"score_spread":0.22619904500280952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413363481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8305904,0.0036571508,0.00001956459,0.03488223,0.003180887,0.0003848623,0.0000012609875,0.000009248169,0.12727436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919424,0.000073249816,0.00012014214,0.0040999833,0.0006454885,0.00001127534,0.000009824584,0.000012287721,0.0030853406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837464,0.00008954529,0.0008906075,0.00018197793,0.0002634193,0.00019980068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861044,0.00029025087,0.00056144973,0.00019392376,0.00031205176,0.00003186883],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059598096,0.00018871913,0.0004432928,0.0008322615,0.0001416502,0.0003547419,0.00035443882,0.00009163614,0.0013655644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021254645,0.000119920885,0.000053123193,0.0014119677,0.00017973309,0.0012920593,0.000080396145,0.0004544987,0.0000013087823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010218847,0.0006246563,0.21540721,0.00031380236,0.00006505806,0.000002284328,0.00071669545,0.00001916417,0.000043601587,0.3402917,0.43664145,0.004852485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019989864,0.00002120605,0.24198365,0.0006517799,0.00007611597,0.000012564102,0.0010828135,0.0027615058,0.00015498347,0.025737228,0.72529966,0.0002195126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103276804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03868676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31455448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010443041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002054162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413408880","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23195","title":"Risk, Reality, Regulations? Finding what’s reasonable in copyright guidance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Risk analysis (engineering); Actuarial science","score_opus":0.032570634283916725,"score_gpt":0.27943500129000626,"score_spread":0.24686436700608955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413408880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34317738,0.012208996,0.001873025,0.046097852,0.012911431,0.0010923917,0.0000038357916,0.000115511364,0.5825196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869879,0.00049184,0.00084205973,0.002333467,0.0014338304,0.000022810462,0.000018854784,0.000028470975,0.007840749],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741536,0.00014914262,0.0013494442,0.0003240628,0.00038402664,0.00037794063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977849,0.00038543082,0.0009404752,0.0003972113,0.0004553558,0.000036586152],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018730626,0.00026157915,0.00047047905,0.0018735491,0.00023032312,0.0014457529,0.0007270239,0.00018575163,0.0028909044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011981864,0.00021343355,0.00015278751,0.0025620603,0.00008989629,0.01086977,0.00011048592,0.0007040986,0.00009896187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054613646,0.00081946264,0.108565524,0.00025246624,0.000046272628,0.000013469885,0.00072986074,0.00016132371,0.00009510398,0.069263496,0.79447734,0.025029516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011868043,0.000028363136,0.24885802,0.002373381,0.00006433739,0.000009201076,0.0015363571,0.0077024656,0.0004797149,0.23973757,0.497648,0.00037577542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008025316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004475051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6438105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002793236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088184694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413769924","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23786","title":"Educational Copying – the “Very Antithesis of Fair Dealing” or Within Copyright’s “Breathing Space”? Part 1: Statutory Provisions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Antithesis; Statutory law; Space (punctuation); Fair use; Law; Statutory interpretation; Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.0310898496594315,"score_gpt":0.2647571683806649,"score_spread":0.23366731872123336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413769924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5808455,0.006051878,0.0025004693,0.081435174,0.021190498,0.0020354025,0.000017585313,0.00013666671,0.30578688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98484063,0.000120891884,0.0017593113,0.0028724908,0.0019895837,0.000029588915,0.000018216271,0.000037390084,0.008331905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972247,0.0001394659,0.0014524176,0.00029753044,0.00054844585,0.00033743583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637693,0.0010627281,0.0013221416,0.00042299667,0.00076928426,0.000045915687],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015322568,0.0003033194,0.00051911763,0.0012093773,0.00036479114,0.00066073437,0.0009174767,0.00015631669,0.0040920195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015094667,0.00017818455,0.00021571043,0.0017140661,0.00022049928,0.003730598,0.0001239132,0.00065559073,0.00005004985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011284641,0.0013737943,0.019132625,0.00070227106,0.00020361527,0.000010188799,0.003261897,0.00012784783,0.00063861493,0.14881487,0.81780577,0.0068000406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001702146,0.0001408408,0.027395952,0.004266726,0.0004080214,0.000052067637,0.007920985,0.007357033,0.0042046066,0.11343662,0.8323672,0.0007477949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030792606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000105386156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40399516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015666157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037604035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99681836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416023714","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23101","title":"Legislating Open Access: Making the Case for a Secondary Publishing Right in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Dalhousie University; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Work (physics); Public access; Path (computing); Compliance (psychology); Human rights","score_opus":0.5186037205800953,"score_gpt":0.5866201866187247,"score_spread":0.06801646603862943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416023714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64412653,0.0064946264,0.0049819853,0.15232377,0.010447962,0.0017036938,0.00005041119,0.000006565416,0.17986448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99352914,0.000028284763,0.0023085775,0.0024774603,0.00023042639,0.00003216877,0.000002075165,0.000008428963,0.0013834336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948062,0.00061594724,0.0017152644,0.0003582055,0.00205791,0.00044652974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794721,0.01636392,0.0012530353,0.0006054787,0.0020968304,0.00020862932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.025920069,0.000130578,0.0003801384,0.027848037,0.00034026822,0.029134339,0.0085840095,0.00008912686,0.00080038555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03802019,0.00007854734,0.00009435479,0.08402626,0.000052714746,0.016230863,0.0010185416,0.00087040674,0.0000015012656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087026565,0.00014720709,0.22804004,0.00002347559,0.000017248276,0.00018418304,0.00056291424,0.0001298184,0.0000062520144,0.021075536,0.53614193,0.21358436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014863915,0.00004839453,0.2597052,0.00032665548,0.0000112301195,0.00031089052,0.011515055,0.0053308457,0.00018408672,0.35299093,0.367873,0.00021733588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22306211,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5149447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34940264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009759297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036425594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416023736","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23510","title":"The Practitioners’ Guide to Using the Copyright Act of Canada to Make Accessible Content for People with Print Disabilities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto","funders":"Universiti Teknologi MARA; International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Set (abstract data type); Section (typography); Copyright Act","score_opus":0.041814091094361634,"score_gpt":0.35365616510368064,"score_spread":0.311842074009319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416023736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8494384,0.00021603752,0.0012027326,0.10017246,0.0020069054,0.0015656335,0.000027980828,0.0000107878805,0.04535902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887149,0.000011249766,0.002224126,0.0010399641,0.00023090556,0.00010466101,0.0000022184245,0.000012241864,0.0076597384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997675,0.00027834813,0.00088929554,0.0001853947,0.0006270958,0.0003448856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521554,0.002942632,0.0005002281,0.00036048912,0.0007994571,0.0001816359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017757157,0.00014519173,0.000310499,0.00015853076,0.000620863,0.00067225524,0.0009948517,0.00005300119,0.00008612355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034735908,0.00008110708,0.00010087468,0.00094362523,0.0003191125,0.0013398057,0.00006751649,0.00017454867,5.074335e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001521801,0.0009074266,0.2710923,0.0003067335,0.00018556058,7.047571e-7,0.06131377,0.00093273853,0.0000945756,0.5447408,0.1126597,0.006243909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055278785,0.00021892153,0.113700055,0.00072098,0.00007332518,0.0000043290293,0.37520725,0.000035963036,0.0022850763,0.07968882,0.42723766,0.00027483457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08986181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66567147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57580966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009214694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015131345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99045193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416023739","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v8i1.23066","title":"Walking the Talk: Establishing Best Practices for Attributing and Licensing Employee-Created Works","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Best practice; Presentation (obstetrics); Creativity; Intellectual property; Subject (documents); Social media","score_opus":0.05593591090750913,"score_gpt":0.30376564877584616,"score_spread":0.24782973786833704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416023739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8234375,0.009943739,0.0034091705,0.04595445,0.005725386,0.0010666455,0.0000015037161,0.000076115284,0.11038546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910467,0.00013013255,0.001186277,0.0035231197,0.0022451312,0.000012926557,0.000009356609,0.000025266243,0.0018210554],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985044,0.000066980276,0.0007146632,0.0002160513,0.00020807164,0.00028981655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965145,0.0013802499,0.0012023149,0.00018897292,0.00069028983,0.000023647604],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015757316,0.00018851424,0.0002887902,0.0006156368,0.0004820637,0.0030744995,0.00043384492,0.000119063516,0.00026118834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052493447,0.00012290041,0.000092845716,0.0011051001,0.00007292009,0.007567615,0.00010725276,0.0005202974,0.0000062654035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001505616,0.0008288257,0.077132754,0.0008468965,0.00030563393,0.000013997811,0.0040273126,0.000050149778,0.0015052076,0.028690426,0.42860332,0.45648986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019802293,0.00009013707,0.025787687,0.0052701975,0.0005719738,0.000055450768,0.01748222,0.015323782,0.0012948756,0.051348113,0.8801738,0.0006215514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049739674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013720572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4558683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072602495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041361598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104400596","doi":"10.17161/jcel.v9i1.23096","title":"The Fair Dealing Exception Explained: A 20 Year Retrospective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Copyright in Education & Librarianship","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University; York University; University of Windsor","keywords":"Presentation (obstetrics); Fair dealing; Reading (process); Fair use; Supreme court; Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.01316047035014522,"score_gpt":0.2389287954486043,"score_spread":0.22576832509845907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104400596","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20972504,0.002707437,0.003386808,0.03986912,0.010742886,0.00065554836,0.0000014500873,0.00009026017,0.73282146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903364,0.000102479855,0.00021363422,0.0016367006,0.0023462703,0.000012800421,0.000005695947,0.000016446482,0.00532953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865663,0.00004968932,0.0006339731,0.0001632153,0.00027407074,0.00022242038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987074,0.00019411469,0.00044428883,0.00021205886,0.0004232848,0.000018855562],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008266766,0.00015067292,0.0002210903,0.00058929494,0.0003060367,0.0008184456,0.00048734882,0.000089635556,0.0013133872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060695835,0.000095290445,0.00012233146,0.0010448754,0.000069825976,0.0026882812,0.00006287241,0.00042424124,0.000107375556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004759897,0.0002801528,0.026914947,0.00007211205,0.000052028136,0.0000032999583,0.00057401747,0.000011932024,0.0003083931,0.15064657,0.8047783,0.015882302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007451773,0.00003997594,0.05474299,0.0004181485,0.00005214214,0.0000054037555,0.00253757,0.0015069675,0.00036505496,0.2932707,0.6460999,0.00021595064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006610582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000090267946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7806114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015687718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045626532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}