{"meta":{"query_hash":"c62dcabb7e61","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c62dcabb7e61","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Current+Southeast+Asian+Affairs"},"results":[{"id":"W1534560257","doi":"10.1177/186810341403300302","title":"The Limits and Potential of Liberal Democratisation in Southeast Asia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Authoritarianism; Dictatorship; Southeast asia; Democracy; Political economy; Politics; Political science; Regime change; State (computer science); Political change; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.015732967062179467,"score_gpt":0.2736928748297797,"score_spread":0.25795990776760025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534560257","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12387871,0.013768493,0.00847869,0.03611605,0.009533523,0.0011116635,0.000039821367,0.000063231215,0.8070098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989155,0.00018402236,0.00011251539,0.0000016250615,0.000651951,0.0000015543463,3.8895587e-7,0.000009738009,0.00012270774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982397,0.0003546272,0.00053182454,0.000108425076,0.0005034482,0.0002619537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895775,0.00007231457,0.000583188,0.00009940858,0.00014862572,0.00013868288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012061844,0.00011295633,0.000270581,0.00013331977,0.00040001143,0.000049506572,0.00022239739,0.00006168672,0.000017037797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019541163,0.00008248432,0.00013123352,0.00016147997,0.00048748788,0.0001666905,0.00002889542,0.0002776002,0.0000061655614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044939545,0.0003376481,0.020712707,0.00008282174,0.00011667136,0.000009654989,0.09068692,0.00005263477,0.00015476088,0.29237652,0.004171499,0.59084874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017625389,0.00029789822,0.104636535,0.00036462888,0.00010490765,0.000023935898,0.82484925,0.00013264047,0.000012670381,0.008553653,0.05896141,0.00029994728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011471708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041585084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000613468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013108876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33636132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590202211","doi":"10.1177/186810341203100108","title":"China–Myanmar Relations: The Dilemmas of Mutual Dependence Georgetown University, November 4, 2011","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Government (linguistics); Attendance; International relations; Economic growth; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.023430018355380028,"score_gpt":0.28117793585333073,"score_spread":0.2577479174979507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590202211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17595111,0.008029848,0.005431478,0.034972247,0.009015827,0.0008996275,0.00018170812,0.00008773909,0.7654304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836874,0.00004832656,0.00016777322,0.0000046067416,0.0007276831,3.2369013e-7,9.91695e-7,0.000010681511,0.0006708523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780977,0.00031617464,0.00040152908,0.000097330485,0.00092023914,0.0004549546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984749,0.000064612505,0.00064615154,0.00018863844,0.00029443993,0.0003312857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015443335,0.00013525011,0.00023102091,0.00023445197,0.0004134978,0.00003136015,0.00055333663,0.00009754376,0.00057431724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015430483,0.000101394886,0.00034019246,0.0003678466,0.00060263067,0.00057000475,0.00007637847,0.00047605138,0.00009892024],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020714858,0.0011982532,0.1544579,0.000072594456,0.00037003163,0.000017344555,0.35330197,0.000043906577,0.00003141591,0.4306549,0.02987716,0.029767353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077228545,0.00011102992,0.11662881,0.00025572008,0.00025571682,0.00002446359,0.4879594,0.000016756449,0.000023323399,0.0063744453,0.38723722,0.00034082675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009871319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009483226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8224177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086403816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002788889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6288371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104133577","doi":"10.1177/186810341002900206","title":"Book Review: Marshall of Singapore. A Biography","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; History; Art history; Classics; Economic history; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.01603109068634552,"score_gpt":0.3066722944648088,"score_spread":0.2906412037784633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104133577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021792432,0.43009686,0.0005785669,0.06669179,0.030413348,0.0022115286,0.00012403555,0.0001959843,0.44789544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677764,0.025498819,0.0027457362,0.0008386668,0.0020676358,0.000011603473,0.000007632199,0.00006565265,0.00098783],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997679,0.00019613313,0.0009674271,0.0001627821,0.0006414442,0.00035323025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99766165,0.00008218971,0.0013959581,0.0002253189,0.0003184008,0.00031645893],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018439285,0.00017729691,0.0005055266,0.00035667713,0.00013690017,0.000042486037,0.0006599509,0.00011324459,0.0025990265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000352932,0.00015978471,0.0005142039,0.0003639802,0.00052811694,0.0003444483,0.000043952812,0.00062791765,0.00008401607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085981424,0.00069122453,0.032211505,0.00067473616,0.00031826636,0.000020828675,0.036201242,5.749757e-7,0.00038511722,0.010654888,0.81391716,0.1048385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042369807,0.000043565335,0.0024952376,0.0011376436,0.00008461996,0.000018967205,0.013355417,5.488922e-7,0.000055929046,0.0009480404,0.98122996,0.0002063749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005539529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027189582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005598253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004808566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895605838","doi":"10.1177/186810341803700204","title":"Neglecting Social and Economic Rights Violations in Transitional Justice: Long-Term Effects on Accountability: Empirical Findings from the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Accountability; Transitional justice; Mandate; Politics; Law; Economic Justice; Cultural rights; Political science; International human rights law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0403294336199827,"score_gpt":0.3543575646217685,"score_spread":0.3140281310017858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895605838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99394125,0.00016678634,0.000036153167,0.0031135613,0.0007899408,0.00022843042,0.000036031324,0.00000464134,0.0016832042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986884,0.000013445155,0.000015023322,0.0000509344,0.001215923,0.0000041503235,0.0000028958432,0.0000064702963,0.0000027642202],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981767,0.0006175104,0.00043960166,0.00016088123,0.00037238514,0.00023291392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987529,0.00075226603,0.00026712992,0.0000900727,0.00006149851,0.00007615252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012781798,0.0001280532,0.00026362384,0.00008794944,0.0007527514,0.00007771569,0.00024634678,0.000112179216,0.00008457624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084062376,0.000090289126,0.00018365918,0.0001690495,0.0007699863,0.00024908708,0.000013978758,0.0005362826,0.0000052262685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025412242,0.0002652642,0.290088,0.000041165527,0.000038804483,0.000012874949,0.7034249,0.000009775306,0.000037310765,0.002475538,0.001179438,0.0021728112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009717855,0.00011345167,0.91882247,0.00028501425,0.000104864004,0.000009514038,0.07659242,0.000036264242,0.00000721299,0.0022374813,0.000675473,0.00014407285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001372627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038626448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62873447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033129187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002929557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57896316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909507831","doi":"10.1177/186810341803700303","title":"Triple Duel: The Impact of Coalition Fragmentation and Three-Corner Fights on the 2018 Malaysian Election","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political economy; Political science; Hegemony; Elite; Politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.032472574080769756,"score_gpt":0.3243161650949372,"score_spread":0.29184359101416746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909507831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58806384,0.0028610502,0.005351567,0.030565752,0.007120792,0.0016914081,0.00010337603,0.00006146547,0.36418077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986051,0.00006367484,0.000015721651,0.000007736874,0.0011799199,0.0000033244817,0.0000010604643,0.000008679568,0.000114829534],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867874,0.00025051288,0.00032990985,0.00010130317,0.00044204114,0.00019747046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989289,0.000065126755,0.0006002553,0.00011783335,0.00020203258,0.000085847205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007777061,0.00011424869,0.00018410347,0.000098866534,0.00071890536,0.00004799423,0.00017153808,0.000049175484,0.00024719947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007392909,0.000058803867,0.00019888535,0.00021447142,0.00061168,0.00016573111,0.000016170638,0.00022290886,0.000020734662],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002448055,0.0012719355,0.021970889,0.00008367254,0.0010275146,0.000007854773,0.35588157,0.000058574147,0.0005786368,0.21445519,0.2638499,0.13836618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024208566,0.003388497,0.20874053,0.000637944,0.00035964677,0.00003945994,0.6989912,0.0002818049,0.00018495104,0.020704024,0.0637247,0.0005264305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000106593776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006191216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41054124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016757613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012315871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55293113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021687643","doi":"10.1177/1868103420906023","title":"Interparty and Intraparty Factionalism in Cambodian Politics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Political economy; Political science; Hegemony; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03749608535528134,"score_gpt":0.30560139943834486,"score_spread":0.26810531408306354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021687643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7649378,0.0057187676,0.0030995307,0.09499531,0.0076424317,0.0008067101,0.00022962318,0.00013013493,0.12243967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864376,0.000102505735,0.0000813641,0.0001228227,0.0009793224,0.0000010032622,0.0000013339935,0.000008647901,0.00005923467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986025,0.00021085066,0.0004068003,0.00013023769,0.00037952955,0.00027008186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990395,0.000045584246,0.00024003297,0.00005886201,0.00009334403,0.00052270317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043788477,0.0001122096,0.0002573156,0.0000991334,0.0001736611,0.00006145225,0.00017696759,0.00008235577,0.00017416486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017543574,0.000107847176,0.00016089232,0.0002064639,0.00033498046,0.00029466214,0.000023791777,0.000507654,0.000019989],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011925876,0.0002569728,0.04626907,0.00011109789,0.00007099856,0.00007107321,0.79647595,0.000016141252,0.000079386824,0.12068544,0.017943567,0.017901031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012017547,0.00012912306,0.0087027475,0.00017409895,0.000045779685,0.0000274509,0.3836272,0.000040583098,0.000017063428,0.00214771,0.6035629,0.00032356379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027996975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018244059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58561933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001751974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002847483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.439788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023276892","doi":"10.1177/1868103420901921","title":"Containing the Self-Interested Individual: Moral Scepticism of Political Parties in Myanmar","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Opposition (politics); Skepticism; Sociology; Democracy; Law; Ideology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Political economy; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039367855232342805,"score_gpt":0.3215145844549557,"score_spread":0.28214672922261286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023276892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9225833,0.0005739655,0.00007924722,0.0065964386,0.0018501497,0.00038038683,0.000031035408,0.000030054754,0.06787545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943006,0.000005937202,0.00013380159,0.000023783497,0.00036201542,0.0000018405515,9.694386e-7,0.00001412099,0.000027488573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731064,0.00041882007,0.00072786835,0.00012684516,0.00079091534,0.0006249155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867564,0.0001800948,0.0005043908,0.00017872368,0.000194046,0.0002671123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014217071,0.00015156485,0.00040381792,0.0003294144,0.00010760844,0.00007999801,0.00055725337,0.00009661747,0.00014109697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019758393,0.00010887981,0.00029976683,0.00037405806,0.00046998926,0.00021279845,0.00006391442,0.00055532646,0.000026331749],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010078339,0.00030032167,0.2240061,0.00006211589,0.00011652111,0.00000941751,0.1962792,0.000009696876,0.0000061371525,0.5763724,0.00026247988,0.0024748524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009038059,0.00031403676,0.048052534,0.0005829037,0.000085935775,0.00001083607,0.9247567,0.00003639841,0.000028451428,0.021675328,0.0033572987,0.00019576977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006408063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010614143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7284775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007109488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033168498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.443999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044776792","doi":"10.1177/1868103420925928","title":"Factionalism in Southeast Asia: Types, Causes, and Effects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Opposition (politics); Charisma; Political economy; Political science; Southeast asia; Development economics; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.031018102397369105,"score_gpt":0.3129113711900555,"score_spread":0.2818932687926864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044776792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1980511,0.039190643,0.0039404207,0.31851253,0.011351229,0.0036016305,0.00039308605,0.00058859825,0.42437077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981291,0.00009324041,0.00015637778,0.000048529917,0.0015051311,0.000005838063,0.0000014272612,0.00002842358,0.000031911248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715465,0.000475799,0.00062749203,0.00027519563,0.00087824103,0.00058864517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983848,0.00020279086,0.0003635431,0.000106761436,0.00018945086,0.00075270445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059312594,0.00026044363,0.0005839845,0.00017880734,0.00024104601,0.000104395716,0.00031352905,0.00014349786,0.0001137006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009781271,0.0002315657,0.00021629925,0.00047544358,0.0005910895,0.00029044022,0.00008186538,0.00073395035,0.00011100908],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050760154,0.0006585604,0.1117342,0.0005031926,0.00044252598,0.00028326496,0.40869573,0.00001402259,0.00009440435,0.4328097,0.0031801262,0.041076683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025413928,0.00025022496,0.03908063,0.0005029092,0.00017808376,0.000041833842,0.9018354,0.00001605393,0.000032785483,0.010638674,0.04431408,0.0005679282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037254515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102304315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80007803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016357003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025526126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9442975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045125000","doi":"10.1177/1868103420932684","title":"Minimal Factionalism in Singapore’s People’s Action Party","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Ideology; Rivalry; Cohesion (chemistry); Political science; Political economy; Incentive; Law; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0729912483017384,"score_gpt":0.34169975289818366,"score_spread":0.26870850459644524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045125000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78474003,0.0006961309,0.0014386973,0.107724465,0.011399843,0.0007047499,0.00004270385,0.00014469585,0.0931087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99820983,0.000060715374,0.00031296042,0.000057671623,0.0012670706,0.0000034590323,0.0000034697123,0.00001579339,0.00006899635],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795663,0.00025752222,0.00068238174,0.00018585536,0.00057587284,0.0003417269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987283,0.00007923016,0.0006399516,0.00007201604,0.00011787569,0.0003626394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075747975,0.00015326616,0.00033298944,0.00017657141,0.00015756272,0.000093330076,0.0003174042,0.000102468955,0.00076620525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034629187,0.0001536132,0.00020026631,0.00031602045,0.00012921837,0.0005252754,0.000031040243,0.0005176459,0.0001818757],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046561143,0.00051816815,0.32093433,0.00010172596,0.00015542973,0.00004563683,0.54158175,0.000115580224,0.00017879468,0.015392838,0.021265024,0.09924509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019359819,0.000116612275,0.13249971,0.00018723375,0.000053154563,0.000027167343,0.6376622,0.00006311364,0.00006107696,0.0026064347,0.2242853,0.0005020352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002140127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033807236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21346985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035600926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059304724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.838941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220858720","doi":"10.1177/18681034221086291","title":"What’s Really Going On in the South China Sea?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"China; Narrative; Tribunal; Context (archaeology); Notice; Bureaucracy; Sociology; Political science; Appeal; Norm (philosophy); Guanxi; International relations; Law; Political economy; Politics; History","score_opus":0.013112923540886157,"score_gpt":0.2584767636819012,"score_spread":0.24536384014101503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220858720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6174731,0.0006079493,0.00018575144,0.02860053,0.007008765,0.00071089435,0.00007564284,0.000040368264,0.34529695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99931616,0.000010208334,0.00006241488,0.00009690021,0.00022069774,0.000008409871,0.0000036377226,0.000015680818,0.0002658749],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752235,0.00032972536,0.0004310621,0.00016958789,0.001293437,0.00025385377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993001,0.000048922586,0.00037098164,0.00019272207,0.000011219683,0.00007601632],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010555673,0.00014509994,0.00017541183,0.00011670621,0.00016492055,0.000118260214,0.00080165203,0.000021168478,0.002251089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005338222,0.000105692,0.00015823211,0.0002607577,0.00008271349,0.0003795627,0.00018894451,0.0007745288,0.00025282582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026378438,0.005923517,0.25720072,0.00010516905,0.00023370271,0.001461982,0.38581827,0.06876172,0.0005877067,0.065647855,0.047990173,0.16363133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039079078,0.0020188452,0.50756866,0.00080471515,0.00010028225,0.0011693444,0.2983932,0.001963909,0.00013341357,0.018180639,0.16470854,0.0010505606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012763495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030178326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38184303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029489936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024851373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385199233","doi":"10.1177/18681034231185941","title":"Regime Consolidation Through Deinstitutionalisation: A Case Study of the 2019 Elections in Thailand","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Chulalongkorn University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Dictator; Democratization; Opposition (politics); Democracy; Consolidation (business); Political economy; Political science; Democratic consolidation; Politics; Leverage (statistics); Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06362629936429641,"score_gpt":0.364709690167303,"score_spread":0.30108339080300656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385199233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96422094,0.00033129752,0.00017678371,0.008781536,0.0022152541,0.0007769974,0.000045536595,0.000046552595,0.023405084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993624,0.000022517888,0.000025507286,0.0000057293846,0.00045671867,0.00000973416,0.0000013370926,0.000009329791,0.00010672264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974786,0.0006106082,0.00064644846,0.0001464054,0.00080370397,0.00031425705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871206,0.00016908383,0.0004919156,0.00021817119,0.00031023388,0.00009852281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009681522,0.00012798024,0.00029447014,0.00019541437,0.0005253631,0.000043272536,0.00034736673,0.000066749984,0.000048048052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008750012,0.00009453272,0.00017767477,0.0013662133,0.00054041354,0.00028705742,0.00007911736,0.00035526167,0.00003123661],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089331465,0.0012740403,0.20657532,0.000035816836,0.00020061928,0.0002354112,0.68881553,0.00024232068,0.000011899415,0.096551634,0.004401894,0.001566151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011782121,0.00009451085,0.022193864,0.0001408808,0.0000806048,0.00016818418,0.9649961,0.0000081354965,0.000007532651,0.008042881,0.0029671756,0.000121910736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045310115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002438058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27618057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019352479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003856283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4040721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}