{"meta":{"query_hash":"c62dcabb7e61","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c62dcabb7e61","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Current+Southeast+Asian+Affairs"},"results":[{"id":"W1534560257","doi":"10.1177/186810341403300302","title":"The Limits and Potential of Liberal Democratisation in Southeast Asia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Authoritarianism; Dictatorship; Southeast asia; Democracy; Political economy; Politics; Political science; Regime change; State (computer science); Political change; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.015732967062179467,"score_gpt":0.2736928748297797,"score_spread":0.25795990776760025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534560257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58206373,0.0042095464,0.0019450632,0.021988623,0.000044140663,0.000020714413,0.00006983778,0.00003516694,0.3896232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981812,0.000360976,0.00013840805,0.00018839854,0.000017166212,0.000008569835,0.000007035378,0.000003182248,0.0010950774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974153,0.0013426238,0.00009272156,0.000263577,0.0002592655,0.0006264095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959545,0.0017002297,0.00074366946,0.000646118,0.00041818863,0.00053731137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051094736,0.00013133201,0.00028996117,0.001108461,0.0029684403,0.006123919,0.00048162538,0.0007300931,0.0028500408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053719976,0.0001827419,0.0002440808,0.0008226074,0.0154150175,0.0040817377,0.0047357664,0.0017477443,0.00027916115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000992727,0.000032924327,0.015110553,0.00008990429,0.000022514752,0.00040495783,0.027236776,0.0011108608,0.0008221496,0.9264696,0.00087177794,0.027728712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003741947,0.0001502759,0.050550006,0.00051206414,0.00003246323,0.00047649257,0.02945234,0.001979898,0.0012210605,0.83086705,0.08468032,0.000040625542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00439664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006259328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006123919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037018058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036701108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027021825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1590202211","doi":"10.1177/186810341203100108","title":"China–Myanmar Relations: The Dilemmas of Mutual Dependence Georgetown University, November 4, 2011","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Political science; Government (linguistics); Attendance; International relations; Economic growth; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.023430018355380028,"score_gpt":0.28117793585333073,"score_spread":0.2577479174979507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1590202211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70567274,0.004843592,0.00048359184,0.19739239,0.0002329163,0.000055948065,0.000043107084,0.000011593697,0.09126411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98229766,0.0021432394,0.00016744473,0.0055318163,0.000050630446,0.000035970323,0.000012792107,0.000004139687,0.009756283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998485,0.0010215712,0.000019881978,0.00006020138,0.0001023119,0.0003110332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989017,0.0004518328,0.0001291679,0.00007852965,0.000105734885,0.00033296397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031885856,0.00017930471,0.0001792948,0.00050221704,0.018608298,0.0049491315,0.00041548762,0.0017400135,0.0025248842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025238453,0.00023109493,0.00008471372,0.0010149276,0.007334316,0.0032764596,0.0040660053,0.0037199233,0.000116928706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007815067,0.00007142595,0.018127607,0.00007699109,0.00002093846,0.0016278074,0.64189184,0.000245821,0.0012379426,0.2533559,0.05116191,0.032103647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002025183,0.000048032747,0.03330905,0.00032380316,0.000015448622,0.00031359814,0.58558166,0.0005227306,0.0005491969,0.023439977,0.35582235,0.000053872365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08377422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21796222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08377422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009277033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16657317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104133577","doi":"10.1177/186810341002900206","title":"Book Review: Marshall of Singapore. A Biography","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; History; Art history; Classics; Economic history; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.01603109068634552,"score_gpt":0.3066722944648088,"score_spread":0.2906412037784633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104133577","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036072033,0.8386105,0.00047987825,0.035435777,0.04145251,0.0001211857,0.0018650035,0.00038194703,0.08129257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031734079,0.48568243,0.00060577533,0.01943519,0.012108926,0.00016737841,0.0020765574,0.0002991322,0.47645122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949646,0.00006441391,0.00006448951,0.00006440935,0.00027414982,0.000036032237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812084,0.000359907,0.00025142048,0.00007672595,0.0009076087,0.00028349657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007627815,0.0017174745,0.002042864,0.0036208662,0.0005939136,0.0024430775,0.0011979584,0.0013930877,0.09989207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034009248,0.00055701163,0.0005597147,0.007272483,0.00044317578,0.0028343808,0.001516789,0.0027056863,0.09818694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008185027,0.000004408422,0.00003180521,0.00044205214,0.0000052576706,0.000034153032,0.000026448211,0.000018839668,0.000050976225,0.00018533327,0.9517414,0.047451157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004083944,0.0000065641193,0.00023376447,0.0005114858,0.0000072067724,0.00014441008,0.000024257788,0.000014365701,0.00003743279,0.00012958658,0.9988821,0.000004732162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072855516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015853193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09989207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016622689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035512382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3341723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895605838","doi":"10.1177/186810341803700204","title":"Neglecting Social and Economic Rights Violations in Transitional Justice: Long-Term Effects on Accountability: Empirical Findings from the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Accountability; Transitional justice; Mandate; Politics; Law; Economic Justice; Cultural rights; Political science; International human rights law; Sociology","score_opus":0.0403294336199827,"score_gpt":0.3543575646217685,"score_spread":0.3140281310017858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895605838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943492,0.00017859219,0.000094169554,0.0012753961,0.000009789306,0.000021676911,0.000026624764,0.0000018427729,0.0040426515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99925166,0.00009021366,0.000023938846,0.00016904385,0.000012537646,0.000018278668,0.000024159526,0.0000026007076,0.00040747825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908009,0.0047274274,0.0004241718,0.0007920825,0.0011879136,0.0020675343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8627262,0.083429374,0.03685663,0.0037038072,0.0068855565,0.006398369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013056259,0.0002578451,0.0005347854,0.0016667775,0.006864597,0.005628615,0.001660744,0.0021751535,0.0059802225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07478786,0.00042155822,0.0003430314,0.0021882514,0.009613006,0.0077227093,0.009121968,0.0056001013,0.00048979383],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035418366,0.0012112824,0.6359248,0.00021139572,0.00009329062,0.001721477,0.33154517,0.0006774718,0.00043730877,0.009051843,0.0015339897,0.017237762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024572611,0.0002405441,0.6729093,0.00037177294,0.00006495684,0.00015528605,0.31798217,0.0009194127,0.00030747033,0.0029119845,0.004073901,0.00003861989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06812366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09459666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06812366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007615777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052902014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1354543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909507831","doi":"10.1177/186810341803700303","title":"Triple Duel: The Impact of Coalition Fragmentation and Three-Corner Fights on the 2018 Malaysian Election","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Asian Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political economy; Political science; Hegemony; Elite; Politics; Positive economics; Sociology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.032472574080769756,"score_gpt":0.3243161650949372,"score_spread":0.29184359101416746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909507831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9729849,0.00014504524,0.00027763867,0.001353017,0.000030683084,0.0000194245,0.000100702906,0.000010108446,0.02507838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99907756,0.00002235952,0.000022676591,0.00005258871,0.0000055872524,0.000004093624,0.000017201466,0.0000027224407,0.0007951192],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998533,0.0006570348,0.000030766874,0.00011532392,0.0001176014,0.00054625067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99385875,0.0029389136,0.0014574799,0.0003269096,0.00040943586,0.0010084208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026388164,0.00019482762,0.00046074335,0.0005371197,0.0025225542,0.0035791697,0.00083224196,0.00094856665,0.016436856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013237439,0.00017796525,0.0003384918,0.00056023453,0.0021763472,0.002060844,0.0026609101,0.0019096724,0.00084597623],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046855067,0.0011458033,0.65888536,0.0003597674,0.0003644117,0.0036377383,0.02123336,0.02790037,0.0019043644,0.17807744,0.020649876,0.081156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005239813,0.001543455,0.7725067,0.00035843768,0.00035219747,0.0005183627,0.099973924,0.03783126,0.0018709626,0.049535375,0.034845006,0.00014031454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02393262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04014741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02393262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003094731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014912623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054986715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021687643","doi":"10.1177/1868103420906023","title":"Interparty and Intraparty Factionalism in Cambodian Politics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Politics; Political economy; Political science; Hegemony; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03749608535528134,"score_gpt":0.30560139943834486,"score_spread":0.26810531408306354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021687643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.738349,0.0044982973,0.0010389927,0.0038953347,0.00007902298,0.000034769233,0.000040758932,0.00000807436,0.2520557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960681,0.0004679029,0.000084495776,0.00010379113,0.000019687952,0.000010370311,0.000008327504,0.0000036287654,0.003233488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993754,0.00025996956,0.000014083002,0.00008457275,0.000042376058,0.0002235547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995821,0.00022404491,0.000068245245,0.000050892453,0.000018665844,0.000055946155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010569994,0.0001327211,0.00011644414,0.0009363318,0.005571909,0.0038279463,0.0003201325,0.0007419894,0.0055581867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079948874,0.00020879885,0.00010077443,0.0012972542,0.016515292,0.002163276,0.002602736,0.0018325069,0.00018568197],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005941529,0.000026338133,0.009966267,0.00012289094,0.000011827635,0.0014214573,0.20841278,0.00027042723,0.0016787166,0.75135636,0.0015068338,0.025166718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032036594,0.0001938597,0.26931027,0.0010689202,0.000027643517,0.0013345814,0.23300771,0.0010041806,0.0022157615,0.09067791,0.40105185,0.00007529932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014402777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031084023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014402777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068107946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019857008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049416065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023276892","doi":"10.1177/1868103420901921","title":"Containing the Self-Interested Individual: Moral Scepticism of Political Parties in Myanmar","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Opposition (politics); Skepticism; Sociology; Democracy; Law; Ideology; Environmental ethics; Political science; Political economy; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.039367855232342805,"score_gpt":0.3215145844549557,"score_spread":0.28214672922261286,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023276892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8401557,0.0018472039,0.0057400553,0.026432522,0.00031471584,0.00005561123,0.000017946279,0.000038732145,0.1253976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960382,0.00014207083,0.00030354058,0.00082213193,0.000021131791,0.000013462488,0.0000024334433,0.000009109852,0.0026478006],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936287,0.004386311,0.00012389963,0.00043448567,0.00063285814,0.0007936738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964736,0.0018690365,0.000635263,0.000339001,0.00042049855,0.0002625303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076870034,0.0002717175,0.00034577397,0.00085470424,0.014242475,0.0052182763,0.001227073,0.0023006017,0.001194346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00959543,0.00029811048,0.0002547928,0.00059404154,0.029544916,0.003356735,0.005374103,0.006714795,0.00016555266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017975366,0.000018717485,0.0019561637,0.0000583457,0.000010181451,0.00046212552,0.7911577,0.000063793814,0.000701966,0.197503,0.0014003643,0.0066497456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017590135,0.00009185807,0.0062413914,0.0004425503,0.000039887953,0.0011253972,0.7695538,0.0009367723,0.0015485063,0.06341408,0.15653226,0.00005591413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0077050477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008397236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014242475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035124714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036093416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04065323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3044776792","doi":"10.1177/1868103420925928","title":"Factionalism in Southeast Asia: Types, Causes, and Effects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Opposition (politics); Charisma; Political economy; Political science; Southeast asia; Development economics; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Law; Ethnology","score_opus":0.031018102397369105,"score_gpt":0.3129113711900555,"score_spread":0.2818932687926864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3044776792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8162957,0.0162776,0.0032838143,0.020398114,0.0004352893,0.000054277833,0.00038510028,0.0000384729,0.14283171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99390346,0.0038011072,0.0003214254,0.000470455,0.00012897931,0.000010720078,0.000060310707,0.0000085647425,0.0012949284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863845,0.00052933104,0.00011112029,0.00019527938,0.00025469766,0.00027126857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918532,0.0037271045,0.0027196205,0.0005917425,0.00068108004,0.0004273941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033601422,0.00018219871,0.0002147335,0.002703582,0.0022591862,0.0028212683,0.00049896754,0.00058886217,0.003670667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006474716,0.0001410756,0.00031120036,0.003428869,0.006903658,0.0024448342,0.002270527,0.0012345115,0.00011915667],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013770205,0.000068198475,0.3541981,0.0010990135,0.00014557182,0.0020824429,0.07642797,0.00064837775,0.0011750105,0.45121178,0.0051023457,0.10770353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012857505,0.00012566234,0.7137337,0.0017785152,0.00015634515,0.0015712563,0.096766725,0.0006914883,0.0015408706,0.08056601,0.102987826,0.00006878521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009041001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013420367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009041001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025774338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014976185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018700719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045125000","doi":"10.1177/1868103420932684","title":"Minimal Factionalism in Singapore’s People’s Action Party","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Ideology; Rivalry; Cohesion (chemistry); Political science; Political economy; Incentive; Law; Sociology; Politics; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.0729912483017384,"score_gpt":0.34169975289818366,"score_spread":0.26870850459644524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045125000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7602331,0.00015837756,0.001065929,0.0029155314,0.000058267797,0.00003090686,0.000045429842,0.0000085400125,0.23548386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960238,0.000022962065,0.00008870738,0.00008911778,0.000009902701,0.000008243858,0.000017181856,0.0000019008924,0.003738205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997881,0.0008499177,0.00010157762,0.00019885488,0.0002476543,0.00072093686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820554,0.0004532764,0.00033602762,0.00015814966,0.00019006703,0.0006569778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002762062,0.00009443929,0.00020642836,0.0005936035,0.005955618,0.0049329037,0.00042620848,0.0009613754,0.009680314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003039557,0.00016450294,0.00024902966,0.00058616116,0.0055361516,0.0019614645,0.004191204,0.0017617733,0.00042977592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001287305,0.00014669694,0.026105898,0.000055762783,0.000016300297,0.0011495543,0.050676,0.00020476423,0.0007322456,0.9029606,0.0031347906,0.014688665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014223267,0.00048352074,0.24556126,0.00032967245,0.000051798343,0.0012249191,0.1346019,0.002843989,0.001498534,0.39580002,0.2173784,0.00008377367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006281777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013631508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009680314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026126462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022989078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03238386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220858720","doi":"10.1177/18681034221086291","title":"What’s Really Going On in the South China Sea?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Balsillie School of International Affairs; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"China; Narrative; Tribunal; Context (archaeology); Notice; Bureaucracy; Sociology; Political science; Appeal; Norm (philosophy); Guanxi; International relations; Law; Political economy; Politics; History","score_opus":0.013112923540886157,"score_gpt":0.2584767636819012,"score_spread":0.24536384014101503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220858720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5600339,0.0047836467,0.0013370445,0.32642904,0.0014422752,0.000036571328,0.00017592416,0.000043953492,0.10571767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96904534,0.0022708522,0.00024134893,0.015747588,0.00034651265,0.000021126718,0.0000692947,0.000037024445,0.012220842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901867,0.00038092348,0.000046324483,0.00012802304,0.00019341377,0.00023263079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815184,0.0007147367,0.0003512569,0.0001283914,0.00036155363,0.00029214044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020308886,0.00028577665,0.00022218893,0.0005253039,0.005765514,0.0050608627,0.0006477608,0.0020047314,0.0031443196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033651057,0.0001475976,0.00032418728,0.0015391837,0.009843264,0.0047591077,0.0019017626,0.004157833,0.00028546923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012976766,0.000032440403,0.06808444,0.00095938833,0.00007307678,0.004267805,0.5955931,0.00066631724,0.003941528,0.23058547,0.062115036,0.033551637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013086084,0.00005193516,0.07128957,0.000865043,0.000038532704,0.00049253844,0.5713305,0.0005628674,0.0019878645,0.024472158,0.3288,0.00009595168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07361348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100984916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07361348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006080224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006184684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385199233","doi":"10.1177/18681034231185941","title":"Regime Consolidation Through Deinstitutionalisation: A Case Study of the 2019 Elections in Thailand","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs","topic":"Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Chulalongkorn University; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Dictator; Democratization; Opposition (politics); Democracy; Consolidation (business); Political economy; Political science; Democratic consolidation; Politics; Leverage (statistics); Public administration; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.06362629936429641,"score_gpt":0.364709690167303,"score_spread":0.30108339080300656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385199233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812027,0.0002452561,0.0003758008,0.00072687346,0.000015934229,0.00004384645,0.000058891776,0.0000071824,0.017323574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690646,0.00020535306,0.00015602293,0.00008814573,0.000012517959,0.000014698283,0.000039503284,0.0000074845016,0.0025699507],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745494,0.0013822605,0.000099045166,0.00013362066,0.00023453146,0.00069563964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959715,0.0020313715,0.00073677104,0.0001982602,0.00032731565,0.0007347966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022220786,0.00019918104,0.00031320442,0.0010416474,0.009982289,0.00421905,0.00095334556,0.0015859305,0.005326548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004503089,0.00026270578,0.0003122069,0.0029943772,0.0035108197,0.0017366622,0.0023960525,0.0027969237,0.0003908674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052873616,0.00090881955,0.17543247,0.0006224832,0.00012033566,0.09877167,0.58160186,0.0053830887,0.0034234193,0.07431284,0.0069960207,0.051898196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006178823,0.0004005801,0.12871996,0.00028942904,0.00005922813,0.0063641784,0.7978413,0.0043490645,0.001699927,0.0039041576,0.056212146,0.000098194185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056564663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12567432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056564663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00541625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030425596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112470806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}