{"meta":{"query_hash":"430ecd4d75a6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy"},"cohort_total":43,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":43,"exported":43,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/430ecd4d75a6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Deliberative+Democracy"},"results":[{"id":"W1012686375","doi":"10.16997/jdd.77","title":"Mad scientists bend the frame of biobank governance in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Narrative; Public engagement; Sociology; Rhetoric; Politics; Ethnography; Political science; Accountability; Media studies; Participant observation; Public relations; Democracy; Social science; Law; History; Anthropology","score_opus":0.11765053703903086,"score_gpt":0.4699137561880382,"score_spread":0.3522632191490074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1012686375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9676483,0.0015366048,0.00014274548,0.027588021,0.00024844817,0.0002387406,0.000017393915,0.0000039984966,0.0025756964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890989,0.0018046723,0.0032907126,0.0019142058,0.00020739323,0.0000010231192,9.158068e-7,0.000010815854,0.0036713802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671906,0.00020215231,0.0011016118,0.0001948475,0.0014989529,0.00028337777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945922,0.0026627677,0.0006615108,0.0002865788,0.0016289675,0.00016796534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003916604,0.00008485493,0.00048369137,0.000060973518,0.00012610186,0.00016127282,0.00041727946,0.0001886251,0.00037840355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013909967,0.000082055194,0.0001992429,0.0005972304,0.0004505227,0.00025262433,0.0000660715,0.0023848931,0.000008187411],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011236615,0.0042395527,0.5816919,0.00034152635,0.00042223177,0.0048945337,0.002496128,0.00009697501,0.019963797,0.008131393,0.13122423,0.24537402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001840574,0.0011432194,0.882576,0.0012972783,0.00003234767,0.00052984135,0.000114323484,0.00010177128,0.0007678592,0.11023256,0.0012796471,0.00008457773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048772682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007981668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30088407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014580913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071535935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179297983","doi":"10.16997/jdd.166","title":"Communities of fate and the challenges of international public participation in transnational governance contexts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Public involvement; Accommodation; Public relations; Public administration; Transnational governance; Process (computing); Standardization; Climate change; Public policy; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Law; Management","score_opus":0.0688763425870268,"score_gpt":0.3862675527040443,"score_spread":0.3173912101170175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179297983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7793294,0.00046689954,0.00014951419,0.21060637,0.00006738711,0.00014632802,0.000011366882,0.0000015816586,0.009221161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808615,0.0014617974,0.00014169305,0.00012794901,0.00005422095,0.0000087737835,9.2637805e-7,0.000002271016,0.00011621738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982282,0.00064062566,0.0004776773,0.000038515915,0.00050375354,0.00011122325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747026,0.001020427,0.000464721,0.000051137667,0.000939021,0.00005446051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001641395,0.00004955355,0.0001718765,0.00009760198,0.00011517067,0.000063401836,0.00026323137,0.0000364934,0.00018687082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076279714,0.000034274228,0.00004913916,0.00012545224,0.0006742823,0.0009851867,0.000020727975,0.00017244297,4.892213e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000597343,0.00010791974,0.0047637913,0.000006585168,0.000043717653,4.807368e-7,0.023937121,0.000014503679,0.00008791919,0.963141,0.00011894132,0.007718247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043977844,0.00019345124,0.7476134,0.000102346596,0.000014171813,0.00000868186,0.029937392,0.0018374238,0.00072335015,0.21069802,0.0043446645,0.00012933834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030767638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002003979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.752443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003284324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028878916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24844214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W186427143","doi":"10.16997/jdd.83","title":"Democratizing Public Consultation Processes: Some Critical Insights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Collusion; Government (linguistics); Deliberative democracy; Citizenship; Constructive; Political science; Public administration; Democracy; Public participation; Public relations; State (computer science); Sociology; Process (computing); Politics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.046858086394590194,"score_gpt":0.3765681914689312,"score_spread":0.329710105074341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W186427143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45062757,0.008257989,0.020226872,0.45814914,0.0030388548,0.0006783593,0.000010462306,0.0001831728,0.058827594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98899823,0.0010440359,0.0042540855,0.0039387858,0.001163466,0.0000017934186,0.0000021772573,0.00001211615,0.0005853064],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712443,0.00058896525,0.0007473987,0.00019000015,0.0009261349,0.0004230673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99363244,0.0017842479,0.000461225,0.00010550042,0.0036353427,0.00038121882],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011783601,0.00017806778,0.0003449966,0.00023775182,0.0013913595,0.0004754863,0.00033675696,0.00020797765,0.00008599952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018185588,0.00014883735,0.00011852083,0.00063279364,0.00046883532,0.0036080598,0.000016341264,0.00070097914,0.000037025802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017159512,0.00073308067,0.00040750956,0.00006894363,0.00011599207,0.0002633559,0.21099092,0.00004864112,0.0017101858,0.74578816,0.017504483,0.022197118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001476194,0.0007795987,0.0015214505,0.00028772978,0.00010006345,0.000111542126,0.029519213,0.00018051517,0.0013219493,0.88324606,0.08092717,0.0005285323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000112916305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000114600465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53837067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016013885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019201614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176686526","doi":"10.16997/jdd.78","title":"Public Health Genomics (PHG) and Public Participation: Points to Consider","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Deliberation; Public health; Public relations; Public engagement; Scale (ratio); Political science; Public participation; Population; Medicine; Environmental health; Bioinformatics; Geography; Biology; Law; Nursing","score_opus":0.5451220002251645,"score_gpt":0.5589103209076058,"score_spread":0.01378832068244129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176686526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45259157,0.0004380984,0.002844335,0.5428583,0.00010114893,0.00023646619,0.0000030680978,0.000009910936,0.0009171297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92998374,0.00068069313,0.022891043,0.045561556,0.00039514631,0.000002509656,0.000002622016,0.000017110497,0.00046557028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667245,0.000384098,0.0012183397,0.00024822063,0.0009602841,0.0005166339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99194676,0.0027276443,0.00050122256,0.00028764014,0.0029788478,0.0015578818],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053907544,0.00015635145,0.00058270636,0.00032327473,0.0002330586,0.00018786358,0.00016645172,0.0001628173,0.00018317162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02442209,0.00012299985,0.00011968679,0.00038212136,0.00016182665,0.00044657974,0.000076457494,0.0016284642,0.000041270727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023837702,0.006019702,0.10146448,0.00042855923,0.0015780953,0.0021865,0.023729302,0.000044954628,0.007893139,0.1714351,0.16901061,0.5138258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009031886,0.014984845,0.46782592,0.0007104869,0.00012531332,0.003241369,0.0019102704,0.000577344,0.001383583,0.4546655,0.044930387,0.0006131028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000031743616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030261986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5132127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029673803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002474775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98379564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227516296","doi":"10.16997/jdd.226","title":"Deliberation for Reconciliation in Divided Societies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Normative; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Ethnic group; Democracy; Law; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10969739017967599,"score_gpt":0.39231900740594755,"score_spread":0.28262161722627155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227516296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661525,0.00039580555,0.005902334,0.022005495,0.001918537,0.00036809538,0.000007380782,0.000015584914,0.0032342514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98988605,0.00014298332,0.006211069,0.0010315021,0.0017643386,0.0000117349955,0.0000041427943,0.000010869053,0.00093729957],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984643,0.0003470046,0.00048164182,0.00007597895,0.00040889782,0.00022221607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974102,0.0006774721,0.00036170482,0.00004511489,0.0013341942,0.00017136172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014045663,0.00007951127,0.0002166176,0.00010434396,0.00021242746,0.000082309714,0.00012510594,0.000114212395,0.000016860886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039905426,0.0000741676,0.00010552223,0.0002010385,0.000102727914,0.00072313496,0.000008726194,0.00016555548,0.000005686544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040356637,0.0003033427,0.05194384,0.000031313917,0.00012931167,0.000018417859,0.6070583,0.00042785943,0.0008008339,0.052617475,0.23870237,0.047563378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004648462,0.00070455833,0.0058080237,0.00012284207,0.00008965075,0.000009143319,0.14308932,0.0005901287,0.00297505,0.71000856,0.13154194,0.00041229618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008009791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036427967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65739113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038578978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010288872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47773403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2401000633","doi":"10.16997/jdd.169","title":"What’s in a name? The search for ‘common ground’ in Kenora, Northwestern Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Common ground; Common currency; Rhetoric; Currency; Political science; Geography; Economy; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02805625927972797,"score_gpt":0.32901181969750937,"score_spread":0.3009555604177814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2401000633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98724496,0.00032607882,0.000053779844,0.006803755,0.0010146651,0.00090445287,0.0000011543877,0.000003293249,0.00364787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98690087,0.0019083887,0.00041098724,0.00030260597,0.00056787115,0.000009739177,0.0000030625858,0.000012097619,0.009884409],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978179,0.00057990616,0.0006334146,0.00013044817,0.00039061435,0.0004477485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821407,0.0006116594,0.00029384112,0.00011887387,0.0006291772,0.00013240516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019488313,0.00011236026,0.00026246248,0.00019564643,0.0017958621,0.00036813825,0.00035655007,0.00009865648,0.0001924909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000086034925,0.00007032134,0.00009459097,0.00026633564,0.00014228058,0.0018678429,0.0000027619153,0.00051991263,0.00002998047],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039920676,0.00022302328,0.05225099,0.000011679939,0.000016827444,0.000008005615,0.93885356,0.000039531067,0.0000021579335,0.006117895,0.00023880466,0.0021975727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001852251,0.0005783603,0.55543023,0.0003702886,0.00002522256,0.000042674703,0.17651276,0.00008751646,0.00007572717,0.059472777,0.20518337,0.0003688343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7152715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76234084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009070747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010042066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414857648","doi":"10.16997/jdd.242","title":"Framing and power in public deliberation with climate change: Critical reflections on the role of deliberative practitioners","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Deliberation; Reflexivity; Transformative learning; Viewpoints; Political science; Sociology; Climate change; Public relations; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Law; Politics; Geography; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.03227020555362969,"score_gpt":0.3017704957236606,"score_spread":0.2695002901700309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414857648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646103,0.00012246303,0.00074858597,0.030319788,0.000062561034,0.0002531404,0.000015838505,0.0000067687897,0.0038605744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976278,0.0003490045,0.0010796151,0.0008136249,0.00005385004,0.000028058419,5.93855e-7,0.000013701908,0.000033736193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833757,0.00031307936,0.0004378128,0.00021221815,0.00042037517,0.0002789427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817485,0.00095006905,0.00040284835,0.00015267865,0.00022437931,0.00009518231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073282316,0.0001561391,0.00021831761,0.0000876961,0.00026866,0.000062590254,0.00013254635,0.00007032117,0.0004818622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094255904,0.00008309005,0.000051156203,0.0003360165,0.00041859408,0.0017330067,0.00007003453,0.00028224138,0.000012429663],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058626505,0.0047779195,0.24780697,0.00014323452,0.00042271742,0.00037412258,0.19708766,0.0007446702,0.14261359,0.2549396,0.0028277573,0.14239913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006192002,0.007735557,0.5719918,0.0019307425,0.00021283036,0.0010719815,0.13241166,0.0011107437,0.04826468,0.21329878,0.014197069,0.0015821725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016647256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024312451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3241848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029915597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004542489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52760535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554115623","doi":"10.16997/jdd.256","title":"When is Deliberation Democratic?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Voting; Framing (construction); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Equity (law); Public relations; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.0299422865835419,"score_gpt":0.33112470848327225,"score_spread":0.3011824218997303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554115623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8319605,0.0003783449,0.019791787,0.13006945,0.0024683457,0.00030767964,0.00001859709,0.000046596124,0.014958714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807531,0.00045318285,0.0059352936,0.003734642,0.0029659246,0.0000040338014,6.131004e-7,0.000021704838,0.0061314553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767643,0.0004918705,0.00062545977,0.00012893253,0.00070914556,0.00036813624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969777,0.0009159637,0.0005092467,0.0001212366,0.0011508103,0.00032506505],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062468223,0.0001423139,0.00029405748,0.0001341616,0.0005454719,0.00009894711,0.00028435895,0.0001468534,0.00094421714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016701062,0.00009441122,0.00018554271,0.0001768846,0.00028534344,0.0010334132,0.0000227863,0.00018578058,0.00011007783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001539969,0.0002368442,0.024133904,0.000013136605,0.00030806867,0.00009450253,0.20298424,0.0000015830657,0.010250936,0.052972797,0.48542345,0.22342654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015717904,0.00031363452,0.0017547222,0.00016005427,0.000119472585,0.00003325831,0.0077474797,0.000010598649,0.014607486,0.744151,0.22917244,0.00035804868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000557445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007401226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6911782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023137432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070119416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626831622","doi":"10.16997/jdd.271","title":"A Randomly Selected Chamber: Promises and Challenges","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Diversity (politics); Political science; Sanctions; Politics; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05761206376247559,"score_gpt":0.2532581248410481,"score_spread":0.19564606107857252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626831622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90525395,0.018436458,0.0017261957,0.017655954,0.0007128573,0.00022585897,0.000046357796,0.000015151104,0.055927217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887009,0.009185316,0.0007926233,0.0001152954,0.00027799184,0.000003899411,7.8180096e-7,0.000011777653,0.0009114005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989615,0.000031014646,0.0006519881,0.0001733864,0.000022254762,0.00015985598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981601,0.00009350559,0.0012534054,0.0002371308,0.00015116882,0.00010464316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007311647,0.00012716872,0.00048018395,0.00014206434,0.00059433986,0.00018814692,0.00019962767,0.00006888232,0.00014122813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082980434,0.000120279845,0.00010097111,0.000031489533,0.00017358005,0.001225898,0.00005150263,0.00021316255,0.00007087593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042006944,0.00020300626,0.010828941,0.000051428095,0.00045426804,0.000060647653,0.0028726514,0.000028258748,0.00016133818,0.9763575,0.0017319581,0.006829929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010272357,0.0006601371,0.18654492,0.00016828523,0.000058361496,0.0008638064,0.0003896087,0.00067793916,0.0010391325,0.6741929,0.124495186,0.00063736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005908167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010863527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30216458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037703154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049419432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49048695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767393296","doi":"10.16997/jdd.287","title":"Reading Between the Lines of Participation: Tenant Participation and Participatory Budgeting in Toronto Community Housing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Deliberation; Reading (process); Public relations; Democracy; Sociology; Community engagement; Political science; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.09448942154642608,"score_gpt":0.409787478978476,"score_spread":0.3152980574320499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767393296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99475837,0.00027463614,0.00021352946,0.0034128106,0.00013596166,0.000087499655,0.0000032082094,0.000004854991,0.001109107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999028,0.00013616623,0.0003679193,0.000064081156,0.00031723193,0.0000029498299,4.026659e-7,0.000006509757,0.000076717275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791294,0.0009055689,0.0005737544,0.000072188,0.00031309415,0.00022242186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971619,0.00095804816,0.0012849701,0.00019140112,0.00031505752,0.00008860381],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033504255,0.00008748789,0.00027005677,0.000026699787,0.0016197668,0.00014366156,0.0002808288,0.000056569756,0.000007614027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034504004,0.00005521998,0.000048651837,0.000057508005,0.0003398118,0.00095065695,0.000059922335,0.00031088092,5.006878e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004842509,0.00006144787,0.9326785,0.000011767113,0.000036533198,0.0000059151394,0.054425836,0.000081721315,0.0003193592,0.00050860335,0.00027596697,0.011545902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035296148,0.000119388984,0.98903084,0.00027249902,0.000058257367,7.3058726e-7,0.006942161,0.00030582325,0.00090254185,0.0012724528,0.0006563986,0.000085958374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072493176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010442445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056352302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001382457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012053594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781643775","doi":"10.16997/jdd.69","title":"Action planning to improve issues of effectiveness, representation and scale in public participation: A conference report","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Transparency (behavior); Public participation; Action (physics); Deliberative democracy; Institutionalisation; Scale (ratio); Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Participatory action research; Management science; Democracy; Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07197954559128268,"score_gpt":0.36574530877765143,"score_spread":0.29376576318636877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781643775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9685088,0.0000372442,0.028036686,0.0014739016,0.00024339138,0.00019872826,2.3975096e-7,0.000010698735,0.0014903451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963706,0.000005902125,0.0032198348,0.00015316269,0.00019382293,0.000007674841,0.0000037526358,0.000006562438,0.000038661005],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886173,0.000037225574,0.00061305956,0.00014105893,0.00020057563,0.00014633236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820364,0.00009530373,0.00069970835,0.00007365433,0.00091567205,0.00001201133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021642295,0.000092553855,0.0002490144,0.0004385533,0.0001040142,0.000059641396,0.000084130785,0.00007966345,0.000008232875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072074117,0.00008373863,0.000029177236,0.0006734576,0.00007736772,0.0011438457,0.000073223266,0.00020147952,0.0000016935143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049231795,0.00021963188,0.88873124,0.00014610637,0.0001007524,0.00015978632,0.0025375697,0.00005266529,0.022997204,0.02645037,0.00023460513,0.057877727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061737874,0.000059840608,0.9384105,0.0001583162,0.000019253712,0.000028339038,0.0022525366,0.00016833511,0.02866287,0.028912371,0.00058679207,0.00012347096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027298252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027779673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057754256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057049354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004216986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34147623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805876460","doi":"10.16997/jdd.294","title":"Citizen Panels and Opinion Polls: Convergence and Divergence in Policy Preferences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Divergence (linguistics); Public opinion; Convergence (economics); Political science; Public relations; Process (computing); Opinion poll; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04334705903911817,"score_gpt":0.36661529959375777,"score_spread":0.3232682405546396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805876460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988438,0.0005041524,0.00015036984,0.0077437367,0.0008043624,0.000110811736,0.00000723514,0.0000066060566,0.0022347074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99295014,0.0042322045,0.000503813,0.0005195656,0.001627704,0.0000013932647,2.9705757e-7,0.000005033804,0.00015986884],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986226,0.00034681318,0.0003419459,0.00011823449,0.0003051767,0.0002652307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986456,0.00042267406,0.00024592225,0.00004853379,0.00041080837,0.00022645165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045396516,0.00009812081,0.00022196496,0.00015824984,0.0003569325,0.00007382105,0.00015396466,0.00009016842,0.000087054985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015021135,0.0000838973,0.0000312439,0.00030785525,0.0007640254,0.00046033968,0.00004757409,0.00017742062,0.0000057402426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011014233,0.00008337221,0.63076615,0.000026636917,0.00006674085,0.00002494826,0.27518952,0.000001055335,0.0009768908,0.048951328,0.0025021033,0.041301142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017593591,0.0010720465,0.5320951,0.00040794682,0.000046502246,0.00006017731,0.06968617,0.00008739212,0.0036481665,0.365592,0.024998926,0.0005462603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001520958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035248644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31664068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000723377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005108475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34212327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28138704","doi":"10.16997/jdd.164","title":"Stakeholder and Citizen Roles in Public Deliberation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Public relations; Conversation; Government (linguistics); Normative; Political science; Stakeholder analysis; Citizen journalism; Public participation; Process (computing); Stakeholder engagement; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08851627796901533,"score_gpt":0.3594261157301581,"score_spread":0.27090983776114275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28138704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8892138,0.00019960945,0.00049852586,0.08693004,0.000077140365,0.00022461539,0.0000029916107,0.000010341343,0.022842955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959167,0.0002624038,0.00093551626,0.00088038214,0.00028863322,0.000008541028,0.0000015627203,0.000006767465,0.0016994505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807024,0.000519728,0.00047617278,0.00011323427,0.0005052688,0.00031533264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834853,0.0003156515,0.00023204148,0.00006875974,0.0007470924,0.00028793895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013637576,0.000090635265,0.00018443672,0.00031538898,0.00035237742,0.0006344556,0.00019199208,0.00008521736,0.00057154294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012375627,0.00007625398,0.0000435986,0.0003735312,0.00021359567,0.0023619877,0.000028474766,0.00031440958,0.000019751087],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010741847,0.0008161639,0.052729037,0.000031095256,0.00020299414,0.00013270589,0.05472712,0.000057974208,0.0068689394,0.43782932,0.09088123,0.355616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00484595,0.0007813385,0.43185335,0.00018139814,0.000030257832,0.00015591201,0.03502271,0.0015352179,0.0016057944,0.40992773,0.11318851,0.0008718387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018066948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069408515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3791243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008947561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007255288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6257994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911455787","doi":"10.16997/jdd.275","title":"Review of Deliberation across Deeply Divided Societies: Transformative Moments by Jürg Steiner, Maria Clara Jaramillo, Rousiley C. M. Maia, Simona Mameli (Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2017)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Deliberation; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.03032285348762659,"score_gpt":0.3360527838809305,"score_spread":0.30572993039330393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911455787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90429246,0.03422527,0.0051281964,0.023923056,0.00311882,0.0022346177,0.0019471775,0.00007428059,0.025056098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79879606,0.18564911,0.0012435081,0.0031813786,0.0011507092,0.000009693274,0.00008525216,0.000061791696,0.009822532],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958039,0.0009848317,0.0011249323,0.0002727005,0.0011347686,0.00067889394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99437714,0.00050834793,0.0023367135,0.00038712757,0.0019699717,0.00042067395],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015323509,0.00035011856,0.0009290247,0.000057668007,0.0022975528,0.00027626194,0.0010583181,0.00029740532,0.000037938717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012823932,0.00033440354,0.00049978687,0.00019412638,0.00084947183,0.0026987551,0.00012650328,0.0006628812,0.000011878539],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030531184,0.00043929263,0.0038751229,0.0010496174,0.0007412759,0.00007233403,0.031444978,0.00001442204,0.0008808443,0.005463669,0.9473855,0.0083276145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010060656,0.0015083454,0.021682706,0.009968066,0.0015912191,0.00005718082,0.06826728,0.00035717798,0.007834337,0.0018276132,0.8746624,0.0021830127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013622259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008410047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15142384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004743981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007176933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940612514","doi":"10.16997/jdd.317","title":"Civic Virtue in the Deliberative System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Normative; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Civic virtue; Sociology; Virtue; Epistemology; Function (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016463093307010002,"score_gpt":0.3150605961390226,"score_spread":0.2985975028320126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940612514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7144539,0.00042240813,0.00087613205,0.020841205,0.00097499223,0.00051583414,0.000007582533,0.000019451665,0.2618885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972079,0.00003025357,0.00025428925,0.0013899271,0.0007039288,0.0000037409102,6.492259e-7,0.000009868909,0.00039948052],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964516,0.0019463438,0.00057137996,0.00014107746,0.0006251125,0.00026449194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974174,0.0016144587,0.0002660834,0.0001600748,0.0004266522,0.00011532954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003172212,0.00013794572,0.00033449882,0.0001316696,0.00036876573,0.00015606203,0.00050743803,0.000096008196,0.00020693842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042202958,0.000088924215,0.00018244698,0.0004767046,0.00019079894,0.00070043636,0.000027127946,0.0005867942,0.00016739324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012328842,0.00011480096,0.001035335,0.000016440361,0.000038455448,0.00010766882,0.028304148,0.000089261965,0.00019849629,0.968271,0.000689242,0.0010118554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028046146,0.0010871124,0.0038141813,0.00071247236,0.00011399831,0.00027968574,0.12306936,0.00039100874,0.00063961535,0.81589097,0.050544087,0.0006528763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026036194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003598461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28275397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015207006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001797306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3626224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945095353","doi":"10.16997/jdd.319","title":"Building a Better Referendum: Linking Mini-Publics and Mass Publics in Popular Votes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Publics; Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Voting; Democracy; Democratic legitimacy; Legitimacy; Political science; Public relations; Inclusion (mineral); Tying; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science; Politics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03268743419746007,"score_gpt":0.327725874223723,"score_spread":0.29503844002626295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945095353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97956747,0.00036594344,0.00037194556,0.016740466,0.00095663045,0.00014760268,0.000003806344,0.000012214267,0.001833919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847888,0.00022238972,0.012036346,0.0014610346,0.001169122,0.000001734918,0.0000018127956,0.000018454468,0.00030030153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99786836,0.0004277695,0.00056859077,0.00015532711,0.00055174564,0.00042819898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981995,0.00056858826,0.0004278838,0.000097746415,0.00047434046,0.0002319411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010076922,0.00014648997,0.0003771653,0.0003055531,0.00024575787,0.0003003273,0.00025458357,0.00020739083,0.00006470027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011740039,0.00013230807,0.00009730344,0.00041197872,0.00012863327,0.0010240468,0.00004501328,0.00063021225,0.000008236586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040650753,0.00008650805,0.8539154,0.000034580902,0.00010284074,0.00007640482,0.05286669,0.000009431428,0.0020682395,0.06927235,0.0018881141,0.019638805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046181637,0.00067794323,0.06725699,0.00091672316,0.00018297829,0.000078088946,0.059083078,0.0006048212,0.0022042214,0.56687045,0.2962229,0.0012836317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016818054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019437917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7866584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017177108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034268037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5395366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992224963","doi":"10.16997/jdd.298","title":"Me on the Map: A Case Study of Interactive Theatre and Public Participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Citizen journalism; Foundation (evidence); Happiness; Commission; Participatory design; Public participation; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Law; Operations management","score_opus":0.4708899559229693,"score_gpt":0.6081509576689814,"score_spread":0.13726100174601213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992224963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99213666,0.000036403293,0.0004751555,0.0047756317,0.00016389813,0.00035210053,0.0000019074896,0.0000052643527,0.0020529865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99910426,0.000011022049,0.00032152084,0.00016542166,0.0002956588,0.000011780642,6.065892e-8,0.0000080050495,0.00008226775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939214,0.0045399144,0.0004621643,0.00012642611,0.0006848173,0.00026526238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950338,0.0028267177,0.0004906781,0.00014502331,0.0012875749,0.00021622026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004840676,0.000099707955,0.00023881227,0.00015926654,0.0007018206,0.00012685417,0.00020341855,0.000041648716,0.00016786183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044056326,0.000060034847,0.000057632886,0.00034333716,0.00056958344,0.00066435506,0.00006154013,0.0003355506,0.000008681155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011329259,0.0039198725,0.054064784,0.000014577647,0.0008411948,0.0011431052,0.8390995,0.000013862483,0.0033838248,0.012146921,0.0034405694,0.08079886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028880767,0.014335475,0.024785683,0.00017804421,0.000240406,0.00027308788,0.9186767,0.0018244993,0.008571075,0.023509929,0.004354045,0.0003630293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028774678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013187313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08043583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009987016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028376185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53979075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992305380","doi":"10.16997/jdd.145","title":"Participatory budgeting - the Australian way","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Metropolitan area; Bay; Citizen journalism; Local government; Political science; Participatory budgeting; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public relations; Politics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.14431634701342597,"score_gpt":0.4461524632280535,"score_spread":0.3018361162146276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992305380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80381864,0.00027793684,0.00030227075,0.14056483,0.00066629343,0.00016265336,0.000004534982,0.000016344524,0.05418649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913941,0.000046765108,0.00030142555,0.0009411612,0.0019000061,0.000002924905,3.448491e-7,0.000005491859,0.005407779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976558,0.00084986544,0.00037002942,0.00005398515,0.0005958906,0.00047442043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835205,0.0005422208,0.0002951369,0.000089699366,0.00035123667,0.00036967616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043052547,0.0000733315,0.00012804887,0.000068872316,0.0009482872,0.000168985,0.00031898398,0.000056635166,0.00056366954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017521256,0.000045974117,0.00010257639,0.00026261908,0.00031482088,0.0010399943,0.000026424914,0.0003884074,0.000054313477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012271768,0.0007083655,0.059743132,0.000017072995,0.0003203313,0.000048860893,0.1672075,0.000046035777,0.0027022138,0.37519503,0.3561844,0.03770436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040114252,0.000119381984,0.047305584,0.000030098072,0.00003629746,0.000038909133,0.019858029,0.000024985291,0.0026350413,0.0082613705,0.9211139,0.00017527283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006306376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004612516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5649295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000774532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045653785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72935545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993252100","doi":"10.16997/jdd.234","title":"Public Engagement with Internet Voting in Edmonton: Design, Outcomes, and Challenges to Deliberative Models","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Jury; Public participation; The Internet; Political science; Stakeholder; Public relations; Population; Public administration; Variety (cybernetics); Public engagement; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.290890559113918,"score_gpt":0.3604319325008393,"score_spread":0.06954137338692135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993252100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81736934,0.003962475,0.061566062,0.106562175,0.0008186698,0.0010298555,0.000004939732,0.000043230182,0.008643241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824564,0.00042160667,0.015465891,0.0010246269,0.00035178007,0.000013914017,4.6694083e-7,0.000018504692,0.00024682214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99691445,0.0012619371,0.0005238225,0.00018887731,0.00068232126,0.00042858365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713445,0.0008416078,0.00032136808,0.00007657127,0.0010101618,0.00061585754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002227346,0.00019128551,0.0004385963,0.00025360135,0.00019573102,0.0001858432,0.00025100968,0.0000970341,0.0000130933795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016711588,0.00014553189,0.000051379237,0.00026984108,0.00015480348,0.0010810299,0.00006844118,0.00041591947,0.0000050469644],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028913614,0.0003310563,0.033780538,0.000019439472,0.00029058228,0.00019374563,0.80370414,0.0011331339,0.00002283867,0.12377077,0.003851968,0.03261266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0135419285,0.0066839056,0.032752134,0.0011420716,0.00032381446,0.00015646103,0.65537775,0.0065350444,0.0010280617,0.22036642,0.059665505,0.0024268858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030330394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022851203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16508704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003533316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075221795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5934618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993298708","doi":"10.16997/jdd.309","title":"Stealth Democracy: Authoritarianism and Democratic Deliberation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Deliberation; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028559327639078334,"score_gpt":0.34792092808480946,"score_spread":0.31936160044573114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993298708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9468015,0.00054627284,0.008437653,0.028851274,0.0028801973,0.00036865278,0.000008521091,0.000051262763,0.012054692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98011756,0.0004221971,0.011294165,0.0017730356,0.004902318,0.000002739095,0.0000019876081,0.000025908193,0.0014600988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969476,0.00085011515,0.0007963161,0.00020011114,0.0007017368,0.0005041165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964461,0.0007782235,0.0006384302,0.00013576497,0.0014689212,0.00053258205],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012404234,0.00020360576,0.00042246925,0.00019966371,0.0018454674,0.00021794182,0.00026051674,0.00021182008,0.00017705522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019092666,0.000183666,0.00011857424,0.00037166395,0.0007293965,0.0010233286,0.000042767508,0.00044166026,0.00004157511],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000394935,0.000520761,0.043195646,0.00007772205,0.000585949,0.0002319141,0.3374898,0.000008698861,0.004588572,0.37739605,0.097145915,0.13836403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025858853,0.0019632636,0.020929864,0.00024364816,0.0003876979,0.00021471451,0.04017206,0.0003865058,0.0033777836,0.8577341,0.07116537,0.00083913875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020811602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005043961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48033804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002051693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010754302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993617038","doi":"10.16997/jdd.160","title":"Synthesising the outputs of deliberation: Extracting meaningful results from a public forum","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Framing (construction); Legitimacy; Thematic analysis; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Public relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Computer science; Social science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.049192996789802615,"score_gpt":0.3164352843833619,"score_spread":0.2672422875935593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993617038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90906864,0.00048661602,0.0021323145,0.07894945,0.0011357343,0.00027022086,0.000017301038,0.000018786955,0.007920948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99311125,0.00009522149,0.0040289853,0.0008227477,0.0016617217,0.0000041995004,0.000002311632,0.000015591584,0.00025794737],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968314,0.00085546845,0.0010056905,0.0001354234,0.0007868782,0.00038513695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991532,0.0050415136,0.0013566504,0.00016836323,0.0016874685,0.00021395096],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011483728,0.00014275791,0.00033877304,0.000107506785,0.00092585076,0.0003294075,0.00042132262,0.00013164419,0.00014163966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009868697,0.00010000234,0.00020023886,0.00031446197,0.00029570362,0.0014190633,0.00004115846,0.00042449447,0.000025748328],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024838897,0.0004884068,0.021727322,0.000016176966,0.00089951773,0.000054933193,0.5390425,0.000076812066,0.015844958,0.05676724,0.058664814,0.30616894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037219548,0.0005105348,0.017801944,0.00081389816,0.0004656384,0.000049415976,0.6004038,0.0007955829,0.036277078,0.23842548,0.0997335,0.0010012168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010872505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003526083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30516773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012448682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059144694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993881387","doi":"10.16997/jdd.159","title":"“Citizens As Analysts” Redux: Revisiting Aaron Wildavsky on Public Participation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Normative; Process (computing); Politics; Public relations; Teleology; Political science; Public participation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04605309493380466,"score_gpt":0.3711589622671172,"score_spread":0.32510586733331254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993881387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78102624,0.00012498269,0.0006277463,0.08745315,0.00031513628,0.00022235156,0.0000026352648,0.000027751243,0.13020003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947003,0.00007959786,0.0005494507,0.0021111118,0.001836986,0.000005821626,0.0000021020342,0.000012975524,0.000701645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709326,0.0010839885,0.0006492471,0.00016606481,0.00063918513,0.0003682422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706,0.00094645476,0.0004299625,0.00013980664,0.0010348171,0.0003889608],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001685122,0.00014271933,0.00031501145,0.00017489262,0.0007629978,0.0003510608,0.0002469137,0.000098487624,0.0017388146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036766666,0.00011791308,0.0002116725,0.00042434578,0.00022521363,0.0012634664,0.000024412882,0.00042644332,0.00035777126],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114262606,0.00023593123,0.0010511319,0.000013770992,0.00015770568,0.000057327376,0.008103217,0.00007660427,0.0024427718,0.9426861,0.0057352763,0.03932593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006598984,0.0006281698,0.0030972897,0.00022250836,0.00009857174,0.00002302539,0.003161808,0.00019262766,0.0014155736,0.96701014,0.023170508,0.00031989723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000035505203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000496372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21367408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013463074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014663495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99917376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994531653","doi":"10.16997/jdd.293","title":"Democracy Transformed: Perceived Legitimacy of the Institutional Shift from Election to Random Selection of Representatives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Selection (genetic algorithm); Democracy; Embeddedness; Perception; Political science; Politics; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03061197254953935,"score_gpt":0.35939771302599943,"score_spread":0.3287857404764601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994531653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9771533,0.000028866414,0.0125688175,0.0069281864,0.00062243274,0.00037927533,0.000015376407,0.000007867656,0.002295864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997794,0.000011057434,0.00083373534,0.00016497193,0.0009417275,0.000005219143,0.0000016366779,0.0000078104695,0.00023988361],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730283,0.00082513684,0.000834819,0.00014136593,0.00065799727,0.00023786035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973795,0.00048537023,0.00058920874,0.000092167495,0.0013034261,0.00015034339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007619087,0.00011886159,0.00035459822,0.00012941954,0.0006666974,0.000040175615,0.00021395223,0.00008692826,0.00028753432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011416343,0.0000827874,0.00021592001,0.00061090227,0.00047581948,0.0007171216,0.00001527794,0.00021891776,0.000007508041],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006192563,0.0013037533,0.26505828,0.000091704766,0.001129078,0.000008955704,0.19234654,0.0013418562,0.4511321,0.053623755,0.0075615607,0.02020985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028463309,0.001073128,0.7886085,0.00035512153,0.00019130448,0.000014362372,0.0017170511,0.0003820443,0.12592524,0.07604389,0.0025927094,0.00025032484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041960394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038706635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5235502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016850706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006047486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6343184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994811072","doi":"10.16997/jdd.341","title":"Embedded Public Reasoning: A Response to Jonathan Haidt’s The Righteous Mind","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Faith; Civility; Morality; Epistemology; Moral reasoning; Deliberation; Legitimacy; Politics; Psychology; Moral psychology; Action (physics); Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06573292530910865,"score_gpt":0.30051318484300804,"score_spread":0.2347802595338994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994811072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9091273,0.00006322987,0.0003463479,0.08632092,0.00097238773,0.00025760918,0.000007588736,0.000010056955,0.0028945934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981969,0.0000149233765,0.0016522148,0.008783634,0.00022446831,0.0000041424614,4.4904667e-7,0.000016779379,0.0073343664],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723244,0.00086063135,0.0005437126,0.00031045778,0.00068403734,0.00036870645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977529,0.00093512813,0.0004305244,0.0002983279,0.000314079,0.00026904486],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013103504,0.00019728047,0.00029773297,0.00023835343,0.00031119966,0.00014429846,0.0006586524,0.000074889314,0.0005829785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016814938,0.00011645389,0.00019477446,0.00040517407,0.000121504,0.00051794003,0.00009865922,0.00052365963,0.0008537702],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0072742174,0.0008540682,0.0016677419,0.000008118666,0.00012262084,0.00083900284,0.0064821234,0.00051228475,0.8916455,0.004736491,0.07247439,0.013383428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010389995,0.009894198,0.12226092,0.0005436966,0.00014761016,0.015342862,0.0024164906,0.0018027537,0.3703709,0.042362206,0.42280003,0.0016683403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010435746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017663043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5212746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010016588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018890951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995137137","doi":"10.16997/jdd.342","title":"Venue Coupling and Actor Circulation in Deliberative Systems: Health Care Governance in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Corporate governance; Deliberative democracy; Bureaucracy; Legislature; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Politics; Key (lock); Public administration; Epistemology; Computer science; Law; Management; Economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.01994110037367948,"score_gpt":0.3082275576872034,"score_spread":0.2882864573135239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995137137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922927,0.00333894,0.000047884358,0.0023356394,0.00062354776,0.00031969574,0.0000054358807,0.000003682298,0.0010324469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988583,0.00032982646,0.00017197084,0.00017404219,0.00015152055,0.0000029238554,7.558551e-7,0.000006819205,0.00030385714],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982627,0.00019297769,0.00052798004,0.00018477316,0.0005416327,0.00028993576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861366,0.00017632982,0.00078049867,0.00006695788,0.00024996506,0.000112590256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093739695,0.00011024954,0.00035705132,0.00006773015,0.00021172804,0.00012477202,0.00016692538,0.00008197772,0.00003462409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001764853,0.000102821105,0.000050771265,0.0003511109,0.00008505833,0.00094117486,0.000021646296,0.00040270682,0.000004390021],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000645208,0.000040311996,0.77697057,0.000020003501,0.00001148425,0.000021517319,0.21174851,0.0043518087,0.00005451553,0.004631323,0.00024032372,0.0018450945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008647517,0.00015875339,0.9648156,0.00042511217,0.000003969848,0.000005155896,0.028287023,0.00058401626,0.000006312894,0.0009253967,0.0037665223,0.0001573801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16700087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6340192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46701834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018110753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017375288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83854616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080453674","doi":"10.16997/jdd.398","title":"Rethinking Representation and Diversity in Deliberative Minipublics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Diversity (politics); Representation (politics); Deliberative democracy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11988713972004536,"score_gpt":0.3626676237196472,"score_spread":0.24278048399960186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080453674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95645016,0.00018055591,0.000577169,0.0396598,0.0003365096,0.00012715801,0.000003236263,0.00001111639,0.0026543015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940253,0.00031847018,0.0022989858,0.0025647485,0.00071815314,6.850895e-7,0.0000010460424,0.000006261809,0.000066335284],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825865,0.0005805583,0.00037304516,0.00012462206,0.00046100645,0.00020209326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981738,0.00070693536,0.00032903612,0.000041387677,0.00048628915,0.00026260407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048727117,0.00008871244,0.00024825166,0.000093624716,0.0005585468,0.000099271834,0.00016762328,0.000101003396,0.000044640394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029525706,0.000085513246,0.00006816542,0.00041085505,0.00020934473,0.00084559363,0.00010299475,0.0003878742,0.0000035624557],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008400361,0.000038592807,0.16783245,0.0000075540397,0.00004575926,0.00011447246,0.81198215,0.000020001467,0.00018329435,0.011046993,0.0034360925,0.005208625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005311967,0.0009511628,0.111440875,0.00023603492,0.00022414081,0.000050502196,0.3898746,0.0010874498,0.00319244,0.46828872,0.018469142,0.00087294553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028189746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000278094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45724174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010288715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026832326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4295947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092798810","doi":"10.16997/jdd.368","title":"It’s Not Just the Taking Part that Counts: ‘Like Me’ Perceptions Connect the Wider Public to Minipublics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"KU Leuven; European Commission; Queen's University; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Deliberative democracy; Legitimacy; Polity; Context (archaeology); Perception; Democracy; Political science; Ambiguity; Salient; Empirical research; Sociology; Public relations; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.17218728047548534,"score_gpt":0.3771176219757368,"score_spread":0.20493034150025144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092798810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065971166,0.00010674886,0.00073142204,0.90448004,0.0022086343,0.00025412487,0.000020193027,0.000021794143,0.026205871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.907939,0.00017963542,0.00020774452,0.0875513,0.0031565703,0.000006320685,0.000001240346,0.0000128264655,0.00094532355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980373,0.000553987,0.00032328695,0.000103772094,0.00067253463,0.00030916638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734086,0.0012728407,0.00033878462,0.000111142836,0.00063842314,0.00029796365],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074440084,0.00011024138,0.00019096788,0.000041995845,0.0011918158,0.00038940817,0.00050038286,0.00007748816,0.0014085323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036585869,0.00006468579,0.0001520648,0.00039662578,0.00029172923,0.00041317169,0.000048276957,0.00043462362,0.00018043249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134285565,0.000029094259,0.002548731,0.0000030634033,0.000092598,0.000011145203,0.19436656,0.000008969635,0.00005397425,0.020606,0.7789714,0.0032950784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014574193,0.00006430235,0.0013129053,0.000016437114,0.000055666485,0.000009728339,0.11820249,0.000034723907,0.000024865427,0.0010602493,0.8789719,0.00010100754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004360137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021128102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8419679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009966324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058645615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093209147","doi":"10.16997/jdd.395","title":"Participatory Deliberative Democracy in Complex Mass Societies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.18756155035384445,"score_gpt":0.38992476750462635,"score_spread":0.2023632171507819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093209147","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3190179,0.0009781803,0.008927939,0.60096264,0.000662494,0.00058448646,0.00004735771,0.00009837369,0.068720646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97706884,0.00021261192,0.0038832503,0.017222619,0.0013253392,0.0000043775835,0.0000028490597,0.000024036348,0.00025606266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956881,0.0013930458,0.0010605535,0.00025484673,0.00093063654,0.00067283766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966757,0.0011387813,0.000507656,0.000118974094,0.00084966136,0.0007091989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015788558,0.0002529441,0.0006207079,0.000116148265,0.0007691587,0.00015986185,0.0004971847,0.00023631308,0.00045060867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002632034,0.00022768343,0.0002931943,0.0005545207,0.0008824081,0.0011901329,0.00006426119,0.0012867356,0.00009343652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008413669,0.00070389436,0.01219918,0.0001305381,0.000506764,0.0007871732,0.32874098,0.0015233236,0.005369154,0.49710077,0.14792237,0.0041744774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017894154,0.00047815437,0.0065044984,0.00010997224,0.000097539036,0.000011913644,0.018933794,0.0014823916,0.0011696059,0.9419308,0.026933145,0.0005587913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003856445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005426777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65805095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026421537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090255437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9284661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146587215","doi":"10.16997/10.16997/jdd.949","title":"Diverse Discussion in Public Deliberation on Cancer Drug Funding","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Deliberation; Diversity (politics); Public health; Political science; Public health policy; Public policy; Cancer drugs; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Management science; Drug; Health policy; Medicine; Epistemology; Pharmacology; Politics","score_opus":0.4403780437412744,"score_gpt":0.47641783969507207,"score_spread":0.03603979595379764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146587215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8682572,0.00038121775,0.00028435068,0.11789099,0.00076691504,0.00012258993,0.000008257967,0.000015604926,0.01227287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882415,0.007336885,0.00044393964,0.001107399,0.00041424166,0.0000049026057,0.000012806948,0.000009249822,0.0024290793],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980105,0.00083483796,0.00041000263,0.00012027342,0.00042330983,0.00020104602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985759,0.0002069025,0.00031307634,0.00012951966,0.0006379252,0.00013663353],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094987685,0.00009286213,0.00018192598,0.00020550207,0.0005780136,0.00019608454,0.00018952538,0.0000653006,0.0016433966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052260887,0.00006812311,0.00009716242,0.0004902804,0.00006859502,0.0009458705,0.00005162616,0.00034004444,0.000025118185],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024184356,0.001081606,0.04826012,0.000027998274,0.00008822017,0.00014047384,0.24352619,0.0008835646,0.008609159,0.024739154,0.026817,0.6455847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005862278,0.0002953432,0.23298669,0.0017067058,0.000117944,0.00005301054,0.35692933,0.0015633128,0.00283489,0.030902177,0.36556673,0.0011815741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010249392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009568681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6444031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004796194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154282876","doi":"10.16997/jdd.971","title":"Expertise and Participatory Governance: The Incorporation of Expert Knowledge in Local Participatory Processes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Democratization; Corporate governance; Local governance; Participatory GIS; Knowledge management; Political science; Process (computing); Democracy; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Public administration; Local government; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.12120231885152614,"score_gpt":0.43349603710716444,"score_spread":0.3122937182556383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154282876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9696226,0.006877342,0.0011588335,0.018372197,0.00017281545,0.00013788261,0.000005570763,0.0000055073956,0.0036472634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761075,0.0013004213,0.00015182514,0.00034363396,0.00023160427,0.000013570691,5.508799e-7,0.00000519043,0.00034246928],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789876,0.0008071281,0.0005310342,0.00010902256,0.00043608612,0.00021797183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794817,0.00053814996,0.00036012538,0.00008978811,0.00091241644,0.00015135102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013844608,0.00008025115,0.00020618587,0.000051750612,0.00025965512,0.0000791532,0.00016246941,0.00006460392,0.00008802271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00248183,0.000057854868,0.00004448668,0.00050383306,0.00057288306,0.0007042824,0.000042084444,0.00021977487,0.0000020278105],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006643297,0.0031192154,0.0413895,0.00030973292,0.00026714124,0.00045859278,0.5779295,0.00029265194,0.011603803,0.20639417,0.030789075,0.12678231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007736687,0.0015898717,0.18915492,0.0019383403,0.0001297699,0.00016024409,0.3157559,0.004663243,0.2064573,0.096489914,0.17458974,0.0013340767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009076009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028448724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2621736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010683954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038897984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69003356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200939096","doi":"10.16997/10.16997/jdd.1043","title":"Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Scholarship; Satisficing; Impartiality; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Legitimacy; Social psychology; Quality (philosophy); Public engagement; Test (biology); Political science; Public relations; Democracy; Epistemology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08109871442850337,"score_gpt":0.379265197670663,"score_spread":0.29816648324215966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200939096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35077488,0.018673666,0.00076976244,0.6053025,0.000698898,0.0005787007,0.000019107707,0.000017372839,0.023165118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483344,0.029243618,0.0018606237,0.019021807,0.0011015682,0.000018096942,0.000014554419,0.000010828866,0.00039448382],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695325,0.0016576113,0.0005754416,0.00014669883,0.00045816848,0.00020881712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967209,0.0011480971,0.00039606736,0.0001798203,0.0014263913,0.00012869108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014640919,0.000096073694,0.00025854446,0.00007903018,0.0005475163,0.0001458545,0.00017939968,0.00007819464,0.00012160555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067720492,0.000074603195,0.0000913277,0.0006919495,0.00021780479,0.0005355096,0.000021252432,0.00035250408,0.000005997025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003287901,0.0006472305,0.017231042,0.00023852884,0.000252358,0.00046810962,0.35843158,0.0000037904892,0.00054412463,0.31234178,0.20709077,0.1027178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021747593,0.00037430326,0.07425556,0.002544074,0.00040542125,0.0008182824,0.18278429,0.000043699136,0.0007467479,0.24970523,0.48544788,0.00069974444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020814252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000249863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5975595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010373868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009894667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81072646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334855578","doi":"10.16997/jdd.70","title":"Crackpot or Genius? Canada Steps onto the World Stage as a Democratic Innovator","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Innovator; Genius; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Democratic deficit; Law; Politics; Entrepreneurship; Psychology","score_opus":0.033196194712121124,"score_gpt":0.31232270543572727,"score_spread":0.27912651072360617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334855578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8665614,0.0006255598,0.00014932416,0.108849764,0.000886043,0.00042085844,0.00011615877,0.000014826015,0.022376077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7558512,0.00024122841,0.00044093374,0.021475287,0.0011507894,0.0000056126514,7.7765e-7,0.000021554975,0.22081262],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701935,0.00043906877,0.0007510301,0.00017279276,0.0010903592,0.0005274042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969377,0.0008228114,0.0008758592,0.00022741301,0.0007265535,0.0004096978],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007527181,0.00020649351,0.00037823737,0.00013076086,0.0014349049,0.00011704245,0.0006355968,0.00006496997,0.0009933983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016697688,0.00013510032,0.0001327551,0.0010754964,0.00037359595,0.0006860489,0.00003962974,0.0005945443,0.000021466423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021017627,0.000059669434,0.0020579956,0.000008341114,0.00013849974,0.0012555721,0.012497941,0.000064596825,0.00008736217,0.012098754,0.9696319,0.0018891896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067171024,0.00012851309,0.0113489125,0.000059242448,0.0000336314,0.00026207702,0.0020819854,0.000026318197,0.00040022167,0.0027132756,0.9820148,0.00025930844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6775257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904321,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3129064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092969096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012830275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35669232","doi":"10.16997/jdd.116","title":"Deliberating Future Issues: Minipublics and Salmon Genomics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Dilemma; Public relations; Political science; Public engagement; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.045550161492544594,"score_gpt":0.32508979159449386,"score_spread":0.27953963010194927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35669232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741361,0.0022220705,0.00035671014,0.009708659,0.0017682551,0.00015421612,0.000005881622,0.000023531979,0.011624589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9444302,0.004648134,0.038887158,0.0021376242,0.008826799,0.0000031701618,0.0000019919967,0.00003965242,0.0010252796],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827546,0.0003540661,0.0005253087,0.00012406624,0.00038157133,0.0003395307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808156,0.00028588055,0.00046735405,0.0000902573,0.00073574553,0.00033917342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006325718,0.0001478018,0.0003075458,0.000119899436,0.0006122402,0.00013297041,0.00023200738,0.00017643024,0.00014827336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070573593,0.00013018864,0.000106314226,0.0002118952,0.00026353006,0.0007006615,0.000036667116,0.00038378747,0.0000097492575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010885109,0.00020968683,0.02284163,0.000027441512,0.0002316614,0.0001864068,0.8084167,0.000002998359,0.0007436814,0.073332414,0.023620678,0.07027785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016574037,0.0007170382,0.007904962,0.00013516036,0.00024220305,0.00015202849,0.34398443,0.000096656215,0.0038932827,0.12310969,0.51734453,0.0007626243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019532941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020110702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49372384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105808045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045294332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53089386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220858112","doi":"10.16997/jdd.949","title":"Diverse Discussion in Public Deliberation on Cancer Drug Funding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Provincial Health Services Authority; McMaster University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Deliberation; Diversity (politics); Political science; Public health; Public policy; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Management science; Sociology; Epistemology; Medicine; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.14340784553427793,"score_gpt":0.35253691389532477,"score_spread":0.20912906836104683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220858112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94405323,0.00009822818,0.00027535218,0.04931736,0.0010886368,0.00016496585,0.000020403797,0.000012942769,0.0049689016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963951,0.00013262514,0.00016604009,0.0010006335,0.00026057407,0.000004878012,0.0000036853546,0.0000061706787,0.0020302634],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997031,0.0012739939,0.00039104794,0.00015240253,0.0008724968,0.00027910108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896026,0.00014448607,0.0004107018,0.00007986992,0.00025197733,0.00015271573],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022048245,0.000099719546,0.0001994769,0.00030256662,0.0017301285,0.00011975212,0.00031323815,0.000035434477,0.0014347786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025662035,0.00007691931,0.00011781267,0.00053265993,0.00006883894,0.0011343826,0.00012568088,0.0005510019,0.0000089701825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096788164,0.0020211833,0.19558747,0.000028511738,0.00024113657,0.00035151382,0.46007288,0.022359215,0.0010762562,0.07399168,0.119081266,0.12422101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005762111,0.00090452225,0.15021296,0.00017298001,0.00012050073,0.000023874854,0.5756932,0.00094968994,0.0006203806,0.05597807,0.20851453,0.0010472303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041383476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013551181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12317378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008828142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045788806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220900416","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1043","title":"Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Scholarship; Satisficing; Impartiality; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Legitimacy; Quality (philosophy); Social psychology; Public engagement; Test (biology); Political science; Public relations; Democracy; Epistemology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.07673279628731786,"score_gpt":0.36970452867543463,"score_spread":0.2929717323881168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220900416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42897144,0.01074739,0.00035160853,0.54210293,0.0008315406,0.0009971226,0.000039532308,0.000020563664,0.015937878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762374,0.0067469124,0.00055158127,0.015532175,0.00061981997,0.000052788866,0.000011397227,0.000009191661,0.00023873571],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961723,0.0022870444,0.00056349824,0.00013679723,0.00062860805,0.00021176712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764323,0.0010251702,0.0004968098,0.00016145458,0.000565351,0.00010795947],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002416104,0.00009175674,0.00023208791,0.00012770944,0.0013065176,0.000092165355,0.0002880787,0.000039834504,0.00023840365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002943964,0.000074050295,0.00008489134,0.00072953734,0.00020112954,0.00043719224,0.00004190085,0.0005009162,0.0000029899581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000540676,0.00056332035,0.011933241,0.00010513865,0.0001553013,0.00015016292,0.4386224,0.000017936944,0.00014389578,0.2175763,0.2697614,0.06091686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014635184,0.0006404019,0.028834429,0.0004347616,0.00020887429,0.00041860566,0.2047507,0.000057517667,0.000049618102,0.14838265,0.61430717,0.00045177276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004132822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010001437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54726595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001945621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066777033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241962641","doi":"10.16997/jdd.82","title":"Pyramidal Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Delegate; Pyramid (geometry); Democracy; Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Deliberation; Hierarchy; Deliberative democracy; Direct democracy; Group (periodic table); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009085778772102763,"score_gpt":0.2855816124780604,"score_spread":0.27649583370595765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241962641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94556606,0.0001192796,0.02927348,0.008918974,0.00054914533,0.00012904784,0.000017154378,0.000016120553,0.015410728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99381435,0.000015869375,0.004014625,0.0006823472,0.00089291413,5.2277454e-7,0.000003808031,0.000010759025,0.0005648044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986917,0.00007414484,0.00059068546,0.00012536724,0.00027820098,0.0002399094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858063,0.00008648785,0.0005293916,0.00012881473,0.00051288493,0.0001617651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024163141,0.00016785983,0.00032763698,0.00009324501,0.0002603866,0.0001149621,0.00024750934,0.000045043755,0.00027064033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002827053,0.00014058112,0.00025678848,0.00019574782,0.000054361357,0.0005929673,0.00002117739,0.0003985785,0.00003159019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027649917,0.0015673571,0.08175935,0.000011936846,0.0006757752,0.0001255913,0.004736157,0.004028787,0.012137752,0.52178013,0.026941031,0.34595963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001934708,0.0006689023,0.074654475,0.000099382465,0.00008186651,0.000038177906,0.00081633206,0.0032898835,0.0025655788,0.9090262,0.0062837945,0.0005407264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007180859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.2752035e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38724607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037502763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015212671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5732731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246755408","doi":"10.16997/jdd.384","title":"Book Reviews Volume 16, Issue 1","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Scholarship; Democracy; Miller; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04359663490131852,"score_gpt":0.3490384361508882,"score_spread":0.30544180124956966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246755408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045965552,0.09402876,0.0059436304,0.7510055,0.0056751897,0.0011703506,0.000023452867,0.00009976739,0.09608781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43407518,0.06151301,0.009946437,0.3632014,0.058663268,0.000020268191,0.000008098288,0.000115712035,0.072456636],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979566,0.0006270336,0.0005902552,0.00010171273,0.00044565045,0.00027875268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982474,0.0002450063,0.0005123132,0.00006751193,0.00044196253,0.00048581453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004767737,0.00011736051,0.0004127168,0.000043417753,0.00037468446,0.00008241808,0.00029204914,0.0000936929,0.0033668831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029512122,0.00009883444,0.00022240539,0.00026850292,0.0001819576,0.0005702847,0.000024036644,0.00037589972,0.00054426194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017694067,0.000025970601,0.0016429528,0.000010463387,0.000029149794,0.000025887799,0.046992518,0.0000011750686,0.00010056048,0.0009504125,0.9415883,0.008614935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024522914,0.00014469516,0.00013548766,0.00003822125,0.000045068045,0.0000046493788,0.0052397028,0.0000088979305,0.00027039277,0.0021353627,0.9916228,0.000109507855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000508354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016396454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38810962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012555753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040032848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99754417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286424219","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1208","title":"The Discursive Functions of Deliberative Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation","keywords":"Deliberation; Voting; Facilitator; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Process (computing); Public relations; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.023241627047532232,"score_gpt":0.32340118447059624,"score_spread":0.300159557423064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286424219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93930244,0.0014126522,0.002308994,0.03963711,0.0049773394,0.00041841614,0.00006986447,0.000020860827,0.011852325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553967,0.00011756321,0.00033875473,0.00036220494,0.0009861386,0.0000114484965,0.0000018941623,0.0000123716845,0.0026299541],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693596,0.0012159755,0.000600737,0.000094879535,0.0008374254,0.00031500022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570334,0.0022224805,0.00086744473,0.00009095954,0.0009638273,0.00015196747],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010616992,0.00010717337,0.00025775918,0.00009090275,0.0036991586,0.00007116333,0.00037986497,0.0000420794,0.00023538187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017914692,0.000077619676,0.00023251314,0.00047722305,0.00047831546,0.00032279664,0.00008302999,0.0005864359,0.0000054082616],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037305945,0.0005306206,0.024099091,0.000013361117,0.00085435814,0.00008031387,0.5680884,0.0013883032,0.001193733,0.2629805,0.10729933,0.033098925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010640734,0.00081395457,0.0032517037,0.000043406715,0.00022293815,0.00004391179,0.6808738,0.00013370473,0.0011392555,0.057177443,0.2549324,0.00030338607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016043705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002112504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20580304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002524986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008729238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377037164","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1182","title":"Discourse, Deliberation and Difference in an Authoritarian Public Sphere","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Deliberation; Elite; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Public sphere; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03806926227637236,"score_gpt":0.35198839289892614,"score_spread":0.3139191306225538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377037164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97765857,0.00017655722,0.0003172481,0.01954059,0.00034012232,0.000121265504,0.00000637182,0.00001836379,0.001820918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645096,0.00070922775,0.00062066794,0.00015010173,0.00042783172,0.000003086221,0.000003568148,0.000011411816,0.0016231568],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985203,0.00023813205,0.0004782988,0.00017003644,0.00029796443,0.00029522472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989484,0.00014980578,0.00038090433,0.000097909586,0.00021131373,0.00021167354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011163977,0.00012043247,0.00026523048,0.00012372078,0.0005017458,0.0003070993,0.0002204802,0.00009782699,0.000071658746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003211521,0.00009594369,0.000063919986,0.00033148017,0.00018176447,0.0020198028,0.000038067927,0.00031868386,0.000011812421],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012371432,0.00033241705,0.28854045,0.000024146626,0.000089321096,0.00018572528,0.12994407,0.00023563449,0.00083805376,0.2194381,0.005614792,0.35463357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001100908,0.00025229555,0.81180054,0.00007724886,0.000015293917,0.000016389577,0.026667144,0.0015453623,0.00003617511,0.15320101,0.00499157,0.0002960763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003171814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077768345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52326006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020086448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041195567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43396562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383961755","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1335","title":"The Influence of Leaders on the Quality of Citizen Deliberation: An Exploratory Assessment of Online Deliberation in New Zealand","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Quality (philosophy); Exploratory research; Exploratory analysis; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11092131712741807,"score_gpt":0.43909415951078457,"score_spread":0.3281728423833665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383961755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98249936,0.00006067977,0.000084804145,0.016633451,0.0002527564,0.00024494698,0.00001920801,0.00000768291,0.00019708285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980989,0.00044424867,0.0004351155,0.00040200175,0.000368308,0.000003963926,0.0000060581547,0.000010618353,0.00023080232],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568236,0.0017341943,0.0012573476,0.0001112238,0.0009768503,0.00023803064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943843,0.003009326,0.0011508262,0.00019084975,0.001138717,0.00012599028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028575568,0.000124333,0.00038192,0.0001515515,0.00030810563,0.000041260795,0.00038434542,0.000103783874,0.000017958388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022032359,0.00008054738,0.0001264109,0.0007181901,0.00054365845,0.00051416224,0.000027739692,0.000364748,0.0000012649325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068152335,0.001049607,0.1984031,0.000099139645,0.00040257728,0.000021675185,0.55054426,0.022465507,0.029467873,0.15825588,0.014978336,0.023630515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020952637,0.0011330293,0.70088184,0.00035555515,0.00008297357,0.0000023563102,0.20550498,0.00053600344,0.007195079,0.08013767,0.0017625347,0.00031273268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046874938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003194475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5024787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111811554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019065301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33821025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404414688","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1603","title":"Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Handbooks on Commissioning, Facilitating, and Evaluating Deliberative Processes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"United Nations Democracy Fund","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03755812200973334,"score_gpt":0.4036957118175656,"score_spread":0.36613758980783223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404414688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7890994,0.042736866,0.0040471293,0.053228322,0.0014966585,0.0016519196,0.00006691471,0.00019537016,0.107477404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656751,0.0048682583,0.021899419,0.0022301872,0.0009523438,0.000040238694,0.0000060863654,0.000059853544,0.0042684753],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944321,0.0017839117,0.0013221835,0.0005173565,0.0013095876,0.00063484575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988101,0.008165807,0.0007115301,0.00013288911,0.0025745106,0.00031423272],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003958263,0.00041598873,0.00072320306,0.00046917578,0.0018330155,0.00092535943,0.00030274544,0.0001907341,0.00009987509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020663526,0.00034524687,0.00015504503,0.00090254715,0.0005510186,0.0026575252,0.00011092801,0.0012773235,0.000030174986],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011438188,0.00079147815,0.002739571,0.0004312613,0.001051577,0.0019641526,0.55645365,0.0007360898,0.00097606954,0.0044646044,0.18258438,0.24666338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010917941,0.010267281,0.0064561903,0.022888614,0.0013966402,0.0015993707,0.65129274,0.0075472808,0.006989249,0.10762386,0.16886505,0.0041557783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001804249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003161357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2425076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037760712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017154258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W82525739","doi":"10.16997/jdd.171","title":"The Politics of Subnational Decentralization in France, Brazil, and Italy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Civil society; Politics; Ideology; Corporate governance; Dialectic; Democracy; Public administration; Political science; State (computer science); Political economy; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Economic system; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.01070962793785138,"score_gpt":0.31913855470685576,"score_spread":0.30842892676900435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W82525739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96619695,0.0010349964,0.0001344913,0.027551768,0.00022098208,0.0001425305,0.0000025511135,0.000002741523,0.0047130017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961558,0.0021680968,0.00019222053,0.00026841505,0.0003129571,0.0000017288799,2.9355374e-7,0.0000033350325,0.0008971632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904007,0.0001459404,0.00034289114,0.000040442155,0.0002773354,0.00015331851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864286,0.00041487245,0.0002813401,0.000026786993,0.0005814409,0.000052700863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040623825,0.00005129143,0.000131806,0.000061169296,0.000564143,0.000048886264,0.000092120434,0.000044292883,0.0000123717355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006908933,0.00003139397,0.0000426595,0.0002050277,0.000375127,0.0004220914,0.000015417869,0.00010562167,0.0000014830047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023659497,0.00018342445,0.2905913,0.000020249308,0.00020791241,0.0000046800737,0.106471956,0.000082463965,0.00039435743,0.5720538,0.012480936,0.017485293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005693703,0.00006811607,0.58052206,0.000042919775,0.000014778566,0.0000039825018,0.014026849,0.00008780936,0.00025346977,0.4004794,0.0038410258,0.000090233676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000341965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026240703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28993076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037676717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014486005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4338989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W946594587","doi":"10.16997/jdd.157","title":"Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics: Mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Scholarship; Bioethics; Public health; Diversity (politics); Discipline; Political science; Field (mathematics); Health policy; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Health care; Social science; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.30564321565661784,"score_gpt":0.4936459133612777,"score_spread":0.18800269770465988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W946594587","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44951066,0.002662867,0.0028476657,0.5419938,0.00055206055,0.0011940157,0.0000065107674,0.000042466072,0.0011899589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97229445,0.000727916,0.012306457,0.013871798,0.0004943188,0.00007357143,0.000015099501,0.00003202482,0.00018435798],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936588,0.0029579296,0.0022140206,0.00024622545,0.00035791562,0.0005651004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944085,0.0014186791,0.0017129288,0.00044022186,0.0015468785,0.00047282994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001338701,0.00021466282,0.0004932307,0.00096365437,0.0012178562,0.00007665762,0.00039652185,0.00023576518,0.00020571137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017231378,0.00018740985,0.00006811743,0.0005907789,0.000115421484,0.002282029,0.00043047304,0.0019987752,0.000034228025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022976889,0.00064445706,0.17586075,0.0012574468,0.00014672078,0.000020487429,0.40385163,0.000116349496,0.00073614926,0.029304706,0.025025856,0.3628057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065122023,0.0039903373,0.26483786,0.004981247,0.000020595942,0.00017343099,0.29034382,0.018062592,0.00010750819,0.39906478,0.010844316,0.0010613219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016968233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012596237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.528122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059433986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001748829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9366888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}