{"meta":{"query_hash":"430ecd4d75a6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy"},"cohort_total":43,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":43,"exported":43,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/430ecd4d75a6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Deliberative+Democracy"},"results":[{"id":"W1012686375","doi":"10.16997/jdd.77","title":"Mad scientists bend the frame of biobank governance in British Columbia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Narrative; Public engagement; Sociology; Rhetoric; Politics; Ethnography; Political science; Accountability; Media studies; Participant observation; Public relations; Democracy; Social science; Law; History; Anthropology","score_opus":0.11765053703903086,"score_gpt":0.4699137561880382,"score_spread":0.3522632191490074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1012686375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5187597,0.004684324,0.003678585,0.15725781,0.0004152256,0.000211539,0.00030966097,0.0001258518,0.3145573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94235337,0.00085746974,0.0010517648,0.006054345,0.000018804672,0.00005849106,0.000051262225,0.000041744865,0.04951276],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99470854,0.0022065109,0.00013641495,0.00060121407,0.0007479362,0.0015993601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869399,0.0066116555,0.00053369714,0.000527283,0.0026635318,0.0027239744],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005597269,0.00023766609,0.00034680284,0.0011769538,0.03306155,0.013278467,0.0017492772,0.0035324472,0.007197937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012928113,0.00047622912,0.00014398666,0.0023033011,0.016324509,0.0020786626,0.0056227096,0.004701671,0.0004295306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026728303,0.00012410847,0.02108934,0.0003550002,0.000040057144,0.0051974617,0.41889232,0.002504744,0.003979431,0.3983152,0.07372328,0.075511694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029746201,0.000033519846,0.025443925,0.0006335646,0.00003175233,0.00025689788,0.32947594,0.0015167764,0.0010164138,0.030112397,0.61128515,0.00016391472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9842972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99162674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96693844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1794985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19238594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95166546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179297983","doi":"10.16997/jdd.166","title":"Communities of fate and the challenges of international public participation in transnational governance contexts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Public involvement; Accommodation; Public relations; Public administration; Transnational governance; Process (computing); Standardization; Climate change; Public policy; Sociology; Economics; Psychology; Law; Management","score_opus":0.0688763425870268,"score_gpt":0.3862675527040443,"score_spread":0.3173912101170175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179297983","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42003003,0.0046113343,0.018798057,0.15087828,0.00048524208,0.00041855886,0.00006090645,0.0001028343,0.4046147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994093,0.0003853862,0.000938021,0.0014225605,0.000032421885,0.00011590764,0.000008759341,0.0000213688,0.0029824863],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90416366,0.079470344,0.00087446393,0.0031306143,0.003621329,0.008739545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94265884,0.042330656,0.002414151,0.0034269297,0.002848822,0.0063207042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052576814,0.00053814333,0.001052576,0.0030117074,0.047684427,0.029314326,0.0032812047,0.010025116,0.007652624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052952055,0.000816393,0.0006259591,0.0027477501,0.111032344,0.02343333,0.04216948,0.008061877,0.00043348645],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003593653,0.000042265434,0.0017922589,0.00008152502,0.000011152191,0.0005911463,0.5382724,0.0002578909,0.0001202544,0.4457471,0.0019447088,0.011103386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002644788,0.00003702778,0.00095981825,0.00022427247,0.000007975223,0.00022120138,0.75432736,0.00024335818,0.000103614504,0.17774278,0.06607471,0.000031459072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024264483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032096624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052576814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0145247225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026855627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2780561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W186427143","doi":"10.16997/jdd.83","title":"Democratizing Public Consultation Processes: Some Critical Insights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Collusion; Government (linguistics); Deliberative democracy; Citizenship; Constructive; Political science; Public administration; Democracy; Public participation; Public relations; State (computer science); Sociology; Process (computing); Politics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.046858086394590194,"score_gpt":0.3765681914689312,"score_spread":0.329710105074341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W186427143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1464753,0.0077324766,0.06422548,0.437578,0.0016958877,0.0013968303,0.00014673044,0.00020821713,0.3405411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714167,0.0013963812,0.007528564,0.007947207,0.00032748934,0.0004990812,0.000023372499,0.00009270523,0.010768569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9143814,0.07142445,0.0011204424,0.002147526,0.00521758,0.005708736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8715062,0.11144289,0.0026091705,0.0029069865,0.009908523,0.0016262464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07406148,0.0009863724,0.0007468858,0.0035015498,0.038736213,0.0212489,0.0037315697,0.009590189,0.0040357616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081759535,0.0008196762,0.00092318375,0.0030256854,0.09070886,0.019644294,0.009439134,0.012450182,0.00035475293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004087805,0.000026726408,0.00025583952,0.00012061107,0.0000055964088,0.0005784359,0.3673088,0.0003233711,0.00023215382,0.6205615,0.005982874,0.004563243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004840212,0.000034465083,0.000738305,0.00057524815,0.00001670945,0.00028331947,0.46186426,0.0014850828,0.0013697229,0.30693546,0.22657517,0.00007388392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06658775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.084405914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07406148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06996027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03147264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5075996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176686526","doi":"10.16997/jdd.78","title":"Public Health Genomics (PHG) and Public Participation: Points to Consider","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Biobank; Deliberation; Public health; Public relations; Public engagement; Scale (ratio); Political science; Public participation; Population; Medicine; Environmental health; Bioinformatics; Geography; Biology; Law; Nursing","score_opus":0.5451220002251645,"score_gpt":0.5589103209076058,"score_spread":0.01378832068244129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176686526","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011000717,0.0017621025,0.009596402,0.8999533,0.00062608335,0.00013247658,0.000020881467,0.0000307174,0.07687732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89523673,0.0017558733,0.0075894534,0.08340657,0.0013869577,0.0006474561,0.00003054068,0.000075106385,0.009871284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.817907,0.15263687,0.0024967883,0.0048312545,0.009697043,0.012430979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75710803,0.20453477,0.007461239,0.009239019,0.008406632,0.013250263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.121342316,0.00073171774,0.0013759028,0.0016119557,0.018145118,0.028192481,0.0036048975,0.031111244,0.014510997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15747406,0.00057114253,0.0010847284,0.0025264528,0.069375135,0.028256265,0.02558689,0.017994752,0.0008451146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006307959,0.00010804749,0.0024346127,0.00021915443,0.0000344624,0.0005115215,0.027338846,0.0004670562,0.00009724502,0.92019016,0.016357645,0.032178175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075064636,0.00008480771,0.0021613657,0.00066640717,0.000027235892,0.00031694255,0.05456097,0.00043107252,0.00020228756,0.84496915,0.09645019,0.000054413238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045980345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049597523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.121342316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0106448345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030406445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6417272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W227516296","doi":"10.16997/jdd.226","title":"Deliberation for Reconciliation in Divided Societies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Normative; Politics; Ideal (ethics); Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Ethnic group; Democracy; Law; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.10969739017967599,"score_gpt":0.39231900740594755,"score_spread":0.28262161722627155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W227516296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20279777,0.0030578382,0.20340976,0.051222354,0.00054640806,0.0005724981,0.0000910991,0.0003050357,0.5379972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800978,0.00019231405,0.011438571,0.0007419025,0.000042288764,0.00020007379,0.000022046548,0.000043073676,0.007221864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94757825,0.04209298,0.0010371006,0.0029718021,0.0026995018,0.0036204115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797071,0.012599605,0.0017133803,0.0035601133,0.0012524424,0.001167329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034053553,0.0006955714,0.0009037176,0.0024624541,0.016381413,0.012647978,0.0023699845,0.0052134395,0.007536569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036572114,0.00052780105,0.0010207448,0.0014877603,0.06097193,0.015359095,0.021885134,0.00449403,0.00087130466],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037119178,0.000016562677,0.00044887085,0.00006362324,0.000018943945,0.00019889651,0.035503004,0.0010566352,0.00014515502,0.954825,0.0008173365,0.0068689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028794046,0.000020237048,0.0002982157,0.0001221002,0.000008794326,0.000083718805,0.015798809,0.001329714,0.00030582296,0.94042003,0.041562393,0.00002123573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004487969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004881661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034053553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009324898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00940782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18009454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2401000633","doi":"10.16997/jdd.169","title":"What’s in a name? The search for ‘common ground’ in Kenora, Northwestern Ontario","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Common ground; Common currency; Rhetoric; Currency; Political science; Geography; Economy; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.02805625927972797,"score_gpt":0.32901181969750937,"score_spread":0.3009555604177814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2401000633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68596345,0.006174833,0.002251824,0.116683155,0.0004936904,0.000065992295,0.00015200413,0.000050827482,0.18816423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97638935,0.0010134483,0.00060077425,0.002513991,0.000021867783,0.000016785554,0.000025423116,0.000027663144,0.019390624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965791,0.0011960104,0.00009166673,0.0004492732,0.0006594222,0.0010244049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961104,0.0012930436,0.00042119334,0.00018311557,0.00069793226,0.001294278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028546697,0.0001759931,0.00037755314,0.00070397917,0.03740939,0.007873767,0.0013749616,0.0019541997,0.0054350747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041210554,0.00021957578,0.00020177242,0.0015759104,0.027261622,0.0040284256,0.005521522,0.0028236303,0.00026464454],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006520159,0.000030328902,0.014385799,0.0002106253,0.000015113854,0.001754786,0.7972502,0.00014799173,0.0013523174,0.13151087,0.023471069,0.029805638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008701222,0.00002580259,0.013091159,0.0002883739,0.000013209425,0.00027925725,0.7256627,0.00011703499,0.0003377856,0.0064139217,0.25371063,0.00005139553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94759667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98772407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069048546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.069048546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06668813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5009846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2414857648","doi":"10.16997/jdd.242","title":"Framing and power in public deliberation with climate change: Critical reflections on the role of deliberative practitioners","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Deliberation; Reflexivity; Transformative learning; Viewpoints; Political science; Sociology; Climate change; Public relations; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Social science; Law; Politics; Geography; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.03227020555362969,"score_gpt":0.3017704957236606,"score_spread":0.2695002901700309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2414857648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15641646,0.01657579,0.12252795,0.5352849,0.0033675197,0.0006482718,0.000046965422,0.00014996865,0.1649822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762308,0.0024255894,0.008671206,0.008675781,0.0005204729,0.0003551797,0.000009620763,0.00011039304,0.003000933],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.79333156,0.18812683,0.0019287241,0.004110003,0.006360266,0.006142598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6670572,0.3146213,0.0044977022,0.0048730737,0.0062181065,0.0027325836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17249916,0.0014246568,0.0015814992,0.0040086308,0.026678367,0.028721767,0.0058032223,0.016747387,0.0025610754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13597733,0.0014554156,0.0014267904,0.002692449,0.19130924,0.038975436,0.021222532,0.0267474,0.0003646928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028719718,0.000031393138,0.00017268714,0.00012893019,0.00000996326,0.00029723675,0.66888684,0.00035446757,0.00011910897,0.32401565,0.0013772404,0.0045777513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006159889,0.00006057661,0.00019888482,0.0009093336,0.000019731084,0.0002820527,0.47765106,0.00090617983,0.0005609935,0.43436033,0.08492041,0.00006887022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006550492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054844785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17249916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017946785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01593425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9122737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554115623","doi":"10.16997/jdd.256","title":"When is Deliberation Democratic?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Democracy; Political science; Voting; Framing (construction); Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Law and economics; Equity (law); Public relations; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.0299422865835419,"score_gpt":0.33112470848327225,"score_spread":0.3011824218997303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554115623","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018217087,0.02046348,0.09795296,0.599638,0.004409153,0.00032026143,0.00025276185,0.00028168148,0.2584647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88927525,0.013740209,0.030114058,0.04707445,0.0044978764,0.0010981599,0.00022661619,0.00041208736,0.013561262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87179697,0.08827213,0.0048612934,0.010296916,0.016157586,0.008615169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87887096,0.08834294,0.007062565,0.012570768,0.0075611277,0.005591659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07391365,0.0006400979,0.0016015352,0.002151372,0.008571822,0.021250417,0.002229045,0.007869179,0.0071490207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13787538,0.00087503734,0.001477651,0.0028677299,0.055611536,0.032925777,0.011824449,0.013250381,0.0024775714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003087809,0.000019600635,0.0006675965,0.00021565091,0.00003661179,0.00007008468,0.0058486653,0.0004466137,0.00007827934,0.97014153,0.007742597,0.014701881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020737292,0.000014048493,0.0003278242,0.00037994375,0.000011268188,0.000053312884,0.0026122094,0.00024084984,0.00017505395,0.92652714,0.069617495,0.000020134745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023211243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018046373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07391365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077646235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014336323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3908974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626831622","doi":"10.16997/jdd.271","title":"A Randomly Selected Chamber: Promises and Challenges","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Economic Theory and Institutions","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Diversity (politics); Political science; Sanctions; Politics; Public administration; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.05761206376247559,"score_gpt":0.2532581248410481,"score_spread":0.19564606107857252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626831622","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12533745,0.0067831306,0.14870904,0.42876127,0.0038448318,0.00032329012,0.00021142598,0.00022181642,0.2858078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507449,0.000911435,0.012012776,0.014351116,0.0016270942,0.00039600994,0.000048633538,0.000104789586,0.019803265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94771636,0.03892946,0.0009054597,0.0050835786,0.004763899,0.0026011865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95797265,0.026267512,0.002788025,0.0055562556,0.003968183,0.0034473445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038241725,0.000377706,0.00084459374,0.0007529111,0.010298444,0.008570202,0.002512406,0.005786739,0.009419332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065539286,0.00053145696,0.00066309253,0.00073336106,0.019147007,0.009909281,0.006765876,0.0070443572,0.0016162851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000336325,0.000022162962,0.00053119636,0.00003855838,0.00000937995,0.00006205858,0.0018393623,0.00038209223,0.00013605,0.98567146,0.003971242,0.007302853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008744279,0.00017226498,0.0011620641,0.0002506761,0.0000331316,0.00026986137,0.005718184,0.0038162842,0.0006693748,0.7952106,0.19251746,0.00009264611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020101268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016833962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038241725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032946246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003996706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20224398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767393296","doi":"10.16997/jdd.287","title":"Reading Between the Lines of Participation: Tenant Participation and Participatory Budgeting in Toronto Community Housing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Deliberation; Reading (process); Public relations; Democracy; Sociology; Community engagement; Political science; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.09448942154642608,"score_gpt":0.409787478978476,"score_spread":0.3152980574320499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767393296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90024596,0.0012554183,0.0050427793,0.032600816,0.00013237161,0.00018037544,0.00006213559,0.000020422798,0.06045977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951799,0.0003067337,0.0005607247,0.0004151679,0.000015326248,0.00006245,0.000013891211,0.000009803429,0.0034359675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722357,0.023294743,0.00029407698,0.0008361232,0.0011183594,0.0022210919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794201,0.014437507,0.0019500701,0.00052782154,0.00091282616,0.0027517003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016476372,0.0004151549,0.0002886136,0.0009904178,0.020264478,0.009170047,0.0018370401,0.0024941748,0.0040873555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018513735,0.00038578932,0.000259115,0.0016425812,0.03411772,0.006245211,0.012480827,0.0034001425,0.00021024761],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022163982,0.00001983045,0.0033994757,0.000035586723,0.0000033233878,0.0003246693,0.9728133,0.00011632749,0.00008912412,0.01865546,0.00094412855,0.0035766864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062313925,0.000028282242,0.00490455,0.00011665741,0.0000054305365,0.00006556794,0.96980256,0.00026272837,0.00013971375,0.0058388924,0.018811481,0.00001794428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35869893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5531886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64130104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031178653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02195984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71322215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2781643775","doi":"10.16997/jdd.69","title":"Action planning to improve issues of effectiveness, representation and scale in public participation: A conference report","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Transparency (behavior); Public participation; Action (physics); Deliberative democracy; Institutionalisation; Scale (ratio); Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Participatory action research; Management science; Democracy; Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.07197954559128268,"score_gpt":0.36574530877765143,"score_spread":0.29376576318636877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2781643775","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10031729,0.013626889,0.35788035,0.22390765,0.0063626897,0.008881095,0.0005492115,0.0017218973,0.28675297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7460642,0.007439159,0.18511313,0.0064241607,0.0011238592,0.010193228,0.0006297909,0.0007796707,0.042232838],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.70102286,0.22487262,0.012625525,0.0066005928,0.045927107,0.008951215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66437703,0.25776723,0.012756329,0.015812114,0.043083448,0.006203787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.24860713,0.00146857,0.0010344002,0.0036573801,0.01081199,0.018602083,0.004727864,0.0053363396,0.01109412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20518528,0.0009839057,0.001068114,0.0040990687,0.008787565,0.01907924,0.017249541,0.008987679,0.0016780611],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045523752,0.0007632684,0.0063840062,0.004779341,0.00016098472,0.0005167907,0.101450145,0.008268048,0.0019677677,0.25998455,0.07740921,0.53786063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030652137,0.0013887632,0.0060730744,0.004189321,0.00018908488,0.00077613647,0.11776539,0.008192511,0.01539158,0.12455789,0.72071844,0.00045124223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035030306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022593774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24860713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009472438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026807964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9266012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805876460","doi":"10.16997/jdd.294","title":"Citizen Panels and Opinion Polls: Convergence and Divergence in Policy Preferences","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Divergence (linguistics); Public opinion; Convergence (economics); Political science; Public relations; Process (computing); Opinion poll; Sociology; Economics; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04334705903911817,"score_gpt":0.36661529959375777,"score_spread":0.3232682405546396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805876460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9054077,0.0007683673,0.033899892,0.0023233616,0.00024449246,0.00055068627,0.0007955252,0.00016541751,0.05584459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988947,0.00022177513,0.00665217,0.00048632562,0.00008304703,0.00060617895,0.0004860706,0.000051708277,0.0024658456],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9472441,0.041893136,0.0013618086,0.0028120957,0.0054050265,0.0012838357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77638465,0.18789497,0.013290526,0.010737038,0.009755388,0.0019374844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050730687,0.00030358406,0.0007604481,0.004532021,0.0022276498,0.005037595,0.0009146385,0.0016726985,0.0041531287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16395576,0.00061151397,0.0005945516,0.0049423967,0.0022322957,0.004655417,0.0044130976,0.0019341083,0.00093249156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027471061,0.00052128575,0.34908983,0.0010712827,0.0006206145,0.00071812613,0.23812568,0.0032476422,0.0048770793,0.030625578,0.009767681,0.35858798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021534452,0.0010771503,0.6478334,0.0009513677,0.00021682435,0.0005630387,0.19387335,0.01851111,0.0054633813,0.072628275,0.058238506,0.00042821595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019649607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002616435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050730687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011513907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010016122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26829273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W28138704","doi":"10.16997/jdd.164","title":"Stakeholder and Citizen Roles in Public Deliberation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Stakeholder; Public relations; Conversation; Government (linguistics); Normative; Political science; Stakeholder analysis; Citizen journalism; Public participation; Process (computing); Stakeholder engagement; Sociology; Public administration; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08851627796901533,"score_gpt":0.3594261157301581,"score_spread":0.27090983776114275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W28138704","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15044709,0.0069622626,0.1148548,0.11109347,0.000735467,0.00033345158,0.00004994245,0.00013071345,0.6153928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98369676,0.0007530703,0.0050851954,0.0026217813,0.00008228912,0.00021769447,0.000013075738,0.000052156214,0.0074779363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.82523566,0.1553275,0.001952552,0.0040668026,0.0064129387,0.007004605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9375422,0.05083924,0.0027122844,0.0033092387,0.0029125798,0.0026844742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07376277,0.00068107864,0.00081907894,0.0031487888,0.017143384,0.01675873,0.001971132,0.007566087,0.00500576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05977784,0.0007866379,0.0008285847,0.002881836,0.06306848,0.024456946,0.020289466,0.0059796446,0.0007602387],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039390558,0.000022616816,0.0012334322,0.00009083443,0.000008774992,0.00019001248,0.12153464,0.000404187,0.00014071313,0.86749256,0.0009727177,0.007870133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004611044,0.000059235557,0.0010398306,0.00057055964,0.000018692894,0.000288401,0.100361384,0.00093654264,0.0005228539,0.75567025,0.1404412,0.00004483068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006966108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058387984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07376277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0094851665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016472068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39009947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911455787","doi":"10.16997/jdd.275","title":"Review of Deliberation across Deeply Divided Societies: Transformative Moments by Jürg Steiner, Maria Clara Jaramillo, Rousiley C. M. Maia, Simona Mameli (Cambridge U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2017)","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Deliberation; Sociology; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.03032285348762659,"score_gpt":0.3360527838809305,"score_spread":0.30572993039330393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911455787","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000055020024,0.9887686,0.00007219979,0.008304695,0.0023958967,0.0000044565813,0.000024672929,0.0000026941536,0.0003717801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026215047,0.984736,0.00014792367,0.0071062804,0.0044546584,0.000029491264,0.00008717215,0.0000118317985,0.0008050708],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99388844,0.0031039524,0.00078384543,0.0007196168,0.0012285804,0.00027561784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761989,0.016732564,0.0017866945,0.0004855239,0.0042099617,0.0005863354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077778455,0.0012138919,0.0025856553,0.005021965,0.0010526899,0.0037026042,0.0013104179,0.0027912306,0.0046113315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02364363,0.00093820505,0.0012393609,0.0073053506,0.0022993817,0.005475545,0.0034020273,0.005220423,0.0026900393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020392895,0.000026724618,0.0004046714,0.032036897,0.00032158665,0.00018710841,0.0010819564,0.000401667,0.000261273,0.007893732,0.5694694,0.387711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005056363,0.0000840368,0.0018102034,0.043705754,0.00026256833,0.0006498598,0.00066214835,0.000097134725,0.00019303164,0.008298534,0.9441182,0.00006803457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003863202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006971906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077778455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032573782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066726664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041133642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940612514","doi":"10.16997/jdd.317","title":"Civic Virtue in the Deliberative System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Normative; Politics; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Civic virtue; Sociology; Virtue; Epistemology; Function (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016463093307010002,"score_gpt":0.3150605961390226,"score_spread":0.2985975028320126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940612514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12369895,0.0027409587,0.09809097,0.04343032,0.00045052226,0.0001947164,0.000056082492,0.00022201437,0.7311155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98924285,0.0002080662,0.0062617627,0.0007064875,0.00007525761,0.00008877117,0.0000092536975,0.00002681561,0.0033808374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888833,0.008322253,0.00021163515,0.00087340025,0.0010351874,0.0006743536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99072874,0.0056185606,0.0005948857,0.0014550085,0.0006998626,0.00090298743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011846419,0.0002817669,0.0004248028,0.0013546189,0.004962127,0.008565657,0.00066852866,0.0026683104,0.0031496272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009781058,0.00033592223,0.00044278626,0.00068774656,0.05390227,0.007370527,0.0074237334,0.0038821779,0.0004394557],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053188783,0.000007299084,0.00018826846,0.000018584195,0.0000026582918,0.000018191125,0.002161776,0.0002180897,0.00007704169,0.9955439,0.0003333724,0.0014255419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013019069,0.000010661077,0.00020449559,0.0000297858,0.0000026916016,0.000028215132,0.00085756445,0.0005514482,0.00012509724,0.9831872,0.014983858,0.0000060063053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090340205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006452368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011846419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034366013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003901824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06265062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945095353","doi":"10.16997/jdd.319","title":"Building a Better Referendum: Linking Mini-Publics and Mass Publics in Popular Votes","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Referendum; Publics; Deliberative democracy; Deliberation; Voting; Democracy; Democratic legitimacy; Legitimacy; Political science; Public relations; Inclusion (mineral); Tying; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science; Politics; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.03268743419746007,"score_gpt":0.327725874223723,"score_spread":0.29503844002626295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945095353","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33610138,0.00064132095,0.36714754,0.014320904,0.0005177135,0.00069166324,0.00017313684,0.0008405359,0.2795658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616304,0.00009848947,0.029734703,0.00045929386,0.00008368136,0.00030996127,0.00004448206,0.0001276339,0.007511376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776649,0.017335042,0.0005305494,0.0016418076,0.0014149798,0.0014127927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96907914,0.020468924,0.0026133996,0.0047081136,0.0016250616,0.0015054079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02191166,0.0005057814,0.0005271741,0.0026781594,0.0072956774,0.0131564075,0.0018431145,0.003232675,0.01480112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047307372,0.0010571852,0.0009008698,0.0024251484,0.013092892,0.020400476,0.015246847,0.0039204285,0.0018840457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018975566,0.00026901902,0.01067562,0.00016311568,0.00003408572,0.00022499773,0.03916095,0.0027458996,0.0018623911,0.8856413,0.0017948468,0.057238087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001356811,0.0004602757,0.013114117,0.00047685605,0.0001231572,0.00014997245,0.03240186,0.016250359,0.006903945,0.8191656,0.110670425,0.00014778864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015480608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022821026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02191166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044312403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038895556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115881324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992224963","doi":"10.16997/jdd.298","title":"Me on the Map: A Case Study of Interactive Theatre and Public Participation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Participatory Visual Research Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Citizen journalism; Foundation (evidence); Happiness; Commission; Participatory design; Public participation; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Law; Operations management","score_opus":0.4708899559229693,"score_gpt":0.6081509576689814,"score_spread":0.13726100174601213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992224963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93318427,0.0006942481,0.009152564,0.008124254,0.00028422655,0.00044997878,0.00015489013,0.0000943815,0.047861204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838501,0.0005975025,0.00391036,0.0006860517,0.00009603573,0.00033069222,0.00004525392,0.000095109695,0.010388881],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795101,0.015889604,0.00031003082,0.0009224027,0.0011759653,0.0021919194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9831676,0.011713467,0.00096607255,0.0010146712,0.00077088375,0.002367358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011234678,0.0013038502,0.0009531788,0.00199463,0.030756697,0.008721911,0.0040999274,0.006773112,0.006659396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021273734,0.00081259385,0.0011327491,0.002339951,0.015958853,0.0069501507,0.01148225,0.0063780895,0.0009919754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009281385,0.00042269222,0.0022216758,0.00021645059,0.000017128685,0.010857603,0.96188724,0.0002858012,0.0005648264,0.011474914,0.0029395774,0.0090193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021114576,0.00016868213,0.0012722078,0.00019166432,0.000015878706,0.0035532953,0.94911695,0.0004353744,0.0006448167,0.0023144083,0.0422308,0.000034807865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008743082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021760318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030756697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004980568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034264273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0594154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992305380","doi":"10.16997/jdd.145","title":"Participatory budgeting - the Australian way","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Public administration; Metropolitan area; Bay; Citizen journalism; Local government; Political science; Participatory budgeting; Government (linguistics); Democracy; Public relations; Politics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.14431634701342597,"score_gpt":0.4461524632280535,"score_spread":0.3018361162146276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992305380","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050803155,0.008397645,0.06812504,0.12371175,0.0040761894,0.0015218552,0.0003019212,0.00035249421,0.74270993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5500793,0.0065761874,0.08714644,0.020919848,0.0006019357,0.0020967906,0.00024167917,0.0003615679,0.3319763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9421827,0.03959194,0.001655604,0.004023385,0.008941109,0.0036053043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968712,0.010899453,0.0014380749,0.0063457917,0.0072915005,0.0053131576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04527544,0.00065813895,0.00090741226,0.0025966899,0.018822629,0.01668551,0.0024653936,0.004152052,0.015435418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052189533,0.001049353,0.0007792773,0.0040685474,0.016900716,0.00961702,0.021569353,0.0070910277,0.0014212007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007960467,0.00012759403,0.0020935868,0.0004702913,0.00004364914,0.00034570845,0.0772173,0.0010411439,0.00063976937,0.7243225,0.046943557,0.14667512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021278833,0.000050926337,0.0027361456,0.00043028046,0.000014134047,0.00010943345,0.009941184,0.0007099652,0.000269182,0.13188207,0.8537738,0.000061571176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10134078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14033279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10134078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019447666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061797995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23944223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993252100","doi":"10.16997/jdd.234","title":"Public Engagement with Internet Voting in Edmonton: Design, Outcomes, and Challenges to Deliberative Models","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Jury; Public participation; The Internet; Political science; Stakeholder; Public relations; Population; Public administration; Variety (cybernetics); Public engagement; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.290890559113918,"score_gpt":0.3604319325008393,"score_spread":0.06954137338692135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993252100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9334051,0.00024378054,0.004358274,0.0039272583,0.00007108308,0.0011867626,0.00010305497,0.00012995292,0.056574743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96142733,0.00021711228,0.008987386,0.001660486,0.000030366651,0.0025291115,0.00015950276,0.000059671955,0.024929022],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97926134,0.015662003,0.00022800532,0.0011315898,0.0012988725,0.0024183115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9674324,0.024658484,0.00092552754,0.0022835245,0.0018359487,0.002864162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03505899,0.00047682985,0.00043344926,0.00088162505,0.009259203,0.0065454384,0.0023313197,0.0019516895,0.008742942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027865857,0.00069921225,0.00042095588,0.0010294336,0.006468599,0.0035384058,0.006686232,0.0030750013,0.00082428893],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004743402,0.010695585,0.07609569,0.0009453054,0.00012933077,0.0024970763,0.4189045,0.004984429,0.0051883277,0.1189067,0.022692429,0.33421722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019733293,0.007335018,0.14215496,0.0016314214,0.00022611301,0.00047092597,0.4481849,0.0098494375,0.014082785,0.05220245,0.3214978,0.00039080752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055624835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14869699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94437516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011466812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015967922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18541187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993298708","doi":"10.16997/jdd.309","title":"Stealth Democracy: Authoritarianism and Democratic Deliberation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Deliberation; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.028559327639078334,"score_gpt":0.34792092808480946,"score_spread":0.31936160044573114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993298708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8506559,0.0006512865,0.02294217,0.006787111,0.0000508772,0.000083971,0.000063591346,0.000026996877,0.11873803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982216,0.00006673723,0.00087041553,0.000107273525,0.000010789821,0.000014219411,0.000009481967,0.0000035396465,0.00069593504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932058,0.0043033804,0.0002945913,0.00047339825,0.0010179157,0.0007050486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9670243,0.01920311,0.008301046,0.0021546215,0.0017235067,0.0015933585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064354646,0.0002521514,0.00024378239,0.0010882989,0.00172145,0.0034570522,0.0004394437,0.0007591007,0.0034415612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021999476,0.00017958686,0.00043356765,0.0012478437,0.009496117,0.0031178542,0.003823937,0.0020601351,0.00019848262],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031460696,0.0004955756,0.37951213,0.00025873768,0.00011099737,0.0003000059,0.08204626,0.0018255347,0.0010067279,0.4580879,0.0013098072,0.07473165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009408896,0.00027305697,0.3745524,0.00035610827,0.000083871884,0.0004436412,0.055500235,0.0058431695,0.0017873816,0.53028876,0.03069134,0.00008595515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032105823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037616952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064354646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002435612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028316746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03403443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993617038","doi":"10.16997/jdd.160","title":"Synthesising the outputs of deliberation: Extracting meaningful results from a public forum","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Framing (construction); Legitimacy; Thematic analysis; Set (abstract data type); Political science; Public relations; Epistemology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Computer science; Social science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.049192996789802615,"score_gpt":0.3164352843833619,"score_spread":0.2672422875935593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993617038","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23811834,0.007831243,0.63741744,0.013757993,0.0017025009,0.0070839855,0.018436408,0.0018935548,0.073758535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43438655,0.0038374015,0.53216016,0.0010678482,0.0005758197,0.008006501,0.011846215,0.001148904,0.0069705825],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9187287,0.05887938,0.006703142,0.0044526616,0.009614718,0.0016213213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70308274,0.24807554,0.012432351,0.017881563,0.017048044,0.0014797986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07874642,0.0025150115,0.0020950024,0.021226691,0.0036925513,0.014790702,0.002806206,0.0027475152,0.0060675065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20682351,0.0010275553,0.002425919,0.019392852,0.0086239865,0.014924896,0.011340726,0.002885144,0.0030072525],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00086745,0.00029144497,0.013951394,0.01564794,0.0005251606,0.0024090528,0.45648706,0.0054568388,0.009087243,0.104810484,0.015789261,0.37467667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002179999,0.0004894293,0.017876323,0.0125887,0.0005890782,0.00063751976,0.27770078,0.011356258,0.01356493,0.43095526,0.23348409,0.000539575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015063846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017100199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07874642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004162046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072932364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41645586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993881387","doi":"10.16997/jdd.159","title":"“Citizens As Analysts” Redux: Revisiting Aaron Wildavsky on Public Participation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Pierre Elliott Trudeau Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Normative; Process (computing); Politics; Public relations; Teleology; Political science; Public participation; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04605309493380466,"score_gpt":0.3711589622671172,"score_spread":0.32510586733331254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993881387","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017171197,0.060187813,0.042132005,0.51827496,0.007452767,0.00013236568,0.000059182807,0.000116443145,0.35447323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82092804,0.03235697,0.012678044,0.07888888,0.005259796,0.00054172456,0.000060791754,0.0003817216,0.048903998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95462567,0.03503892,0.00069281366,0.0027200559,0.004313583,0.0026089028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652613,0.030386176,0.00090552366,0.00070420234,0.0018468578,0.0008960548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02921836,0.0012202052,0.0012340036,0.003961749,0.019739928,0.023199657,0.0028397334,0.012570079,0.0033725004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023335354,0.0007191162,0.0011054039,0.004044943,0.06880559,0.03044515,0.010564047,0.023210835,0.001008513],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072453736,0.000010051303,0.0000597406,0.0000399074,0.000002307784,0.000055853066,0.011865483,0.00010375763,0.00001610625,0.9803212,0.005393121,0.0021250676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011463206,0.000012362783,0.00009321454,0.0005221527,0.000004924324,0.00005895828,0.009243928,0.00044186125,0.00010763034,0.7664704,0.2230089,0.000024346376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014022496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011490745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02921836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016231941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013525639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15452331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994531653","doi":"10.16997/jdd.293","title":"Democracy Transformed: Perceived Legitimacy of the Institutional Shift from Election to Random Selection of Representatives","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Selection (genetic algorithm); Democracy; Embeddedness; Perception; Political science; Politics; Public relations; Public administration; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03061197254953935,"score_gpt":0.35939771302599943,"score_spread":0.3287857404764601,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994531653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95574933,0.00018517206,0.0025349844,0.0038888813,0.000066234636,0.000055185003,0.000031821455,0.000024149549,0.0374643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948466,0.000027787972,0.00012978005,0.00010818223,0.0000069754465,0.000006072638,0.0000079749825,0.0000038605044,0.00022458204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9798631,0.0133946845,0.0010980377,0.0011006645,0.002968326,0.0015751646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9425562,0.031034898,0.013550625,0.003952678,0.004949799,0.003955736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014826229,0.00017835223,0.0003025837,0.0013447714,0.0030101188,0.0071107927,0.00067966146,0.0014750529,0.00539814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06383494,0.0002443015,0.00044417032,0.0010006154,0.011826939,0.003160482,0.0048535354,0.003946929,0.00038397367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008285977,0.00082570076,0.44353023,0.0003658468,0.00023531157,0.0010733553,0.3882245,0.00135638,0.0048083514,0.09693583,0.0026733384,0.05914255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002991852,0.001038739,0.40839192,0.00057059946,0.0001448917,0.0011439552,0.47556743,0.0064166305,0.0028642975,0.0510185,0.05230897,0.00023490832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003419045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038528133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014826229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033070368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020935992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07840949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994811072","doi":"10.16997/jdd.341","title":"Embedded Public Reasoning: A Response to Jonathan Haidt’s The Righteous Mind","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Faith; Civility; Morality; Epistemology; Moral reasoning; Deliberation; Legitimacy; Politics; Psychology; Moral psychology; Action (physics); Sociology; Social psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.06573292530910865,"score_gpt":0.30051318484300804,"score_spread":0.2347802595338994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994811072","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002912303,0.0035030872,0.001016399,0.9823172,0.0029982172,0.0000056949907,0.0000063844036,0.0000150361575,0.007225638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20162234,0.0060322434,0.0025946815,0.7674149,0.0073331785,0.00008339668,0.000021980386,0.00014099324,0.014756314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194336,0.0050113737,0.00016085111,0.0009339035,0.0013651523,0.00058535783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9680979,0.026466694,0.000897041,0.0007585802,0.0023832037,0.0013964999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012077698,0.0005270191,0.0007881487,0.0008995982,0.00895143,0.010208135,0.003062182,0.023171946,0.0025255664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029668808,0.00064290053,0.0007260214,0.0010398048,0.038347095,0.01681114,0.0055632154,0.04540075,0.00064416457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007782538,0.000106484615,0.00041909344,0.00013367097,0.000023143048,0.0012034243,0.063287504,0.00024851668,0.00035620478,0.627192,0.2952639,0.01168823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000723053,0.00003065795,0.0005963733,0.00046824027,0.000014261772,0.00095657294,0.03491945,0.00097424595,0.00042095772,0.5322387,0.42922315,0.000085064785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074307183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008928393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023171946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008138569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004637629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06387377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2995137137","doi":"10.16997/jdd.342","title":"Venue Coupling and Actor Circulation in Deliberative Systems: Health Care Governance in Ontario","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Corporate governance; Deliberative democracy; Bureaucracy; Legislature; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Politics; Key (lock); Public administration; Epistemology; Computer science; Law; Management; Economics; Computer security","score_opus":0.01994110037367948,"score_gpt":0.3082275576872034,"score_spread":0.2882864573135239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2995137137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8148286,0.0022035234,0.01295696,0.021409754,0.00006419965,0.00037726742,0.00026651286,0.00007136707,0.14782177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355114,0.00032119383,0.0010845764,0.00014091528,0.0000049246314,0.000033306616,0.000027796517,0.0000065168324,0.0048295376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945391,0.0021302968,0.00019310608,0.0004635605,0.001018009,0.0016558869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995387,0.001654797,0.00078379223,0.00030013765,0.00078282156,0.0010915387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037402785,0.00020118729,0.0002865605,0.001367796,0.013091358,0.006043293,0.0010587969,0.0010724013,0.0028820895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076954104,0.00036656213,0.00029032023,0.003475789,0.011992651,0.002329699,0.0056141927,0.00093953736,0.000120663906],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021299341,0.00007895622,0.14313616,0.00035727854,0.000059005455,0.002193282,0.28691915,0.008034053,0.0012851984,0.48465437,0.006412671,0.0666569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001323605,0.00012963093,0.29448146,0.00068672636,0.00014451312,0.00056695304,0.33598053,0.015352514,0.0014095675,0.10678009,0.2441379,0.00019781216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9769215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15306163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15306163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13603762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080453674","doi":"10.16997/jdd.398","title":"Rethinking Representation and Diversity in Deliberative Minipublics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Representativeness heuristic; Diversity (politics); Representation (politics); Deliberative democracy; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11988713972004536,"score_gpt":0.3626676237196472,"score_spread":0.24278048399960186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080453674","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33879024,0.00073263224,0.5169957,0.029079953,0.00064464816,0.003888152,0.00019172883,0.00040187838,0.109275125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9153617,0.00017131011,0.07167063,0.0024113795,0.00011294801,0.0054501747,0.000072354866,0.000120443,0.0046290886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6671256,0.30570668,0.004854876,0.00754524,0.010653511,0.0041141193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6481874,0.29186937,0.012221299,0.033746753,0.009393405,0.0045818323],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22816454,0.00082848687,0.0009885206,0.0024679173,0.008763843,0.014159414,0.003640123,0.0040454906,0.007274194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22381558,0.0011163369,0.00097551354,0.0020393352,0.032287028,0.01992391,0.02722516,0.0049358676,0.0014481401],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003835595,0.00040966598,0.00774341,0.0007836323,0.00006155181,0.00024733544,0.2579666,0.0012339246,0.00244306,0.6578968,0.0027111673,0.068119235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003801501,0.00075508887,0.0051159253,0.001488174,0.00011295186,0.0003334132,0.08805136,0.006550267,0.0064952685,0.7790659,0.11152851,0.00012304405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005301544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008841686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22816454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005031805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008224094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95181054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092798810","doi":"10.16997/jdd.368","title":"It’s Not Just the Taking Part that Counts: ‘Like Me’ Perceptions Connect the Wider Public to Minipublics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"KU Leuven; European Commission; Queen's University; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Deliberative democracy; Legitimacy; Polity; Context (archaeology); Perception; Democracy; Political science; Ambiguity; Salient; Empirical research; Sociology; Public relations; Social psychology; Psychology; Politics; Epistemology; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.17218728047548534,"score_gpt":0.3771176219757368,"score_spread":0.20493034150025144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092798810","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8277388,0.0005340917,0.008411948,0.012993761,0.00021142088,0.000041221116,0.000085357824,0.00007494544,0.14990845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972365,0.00008686966,0.00039971533,0.00068276207,0.00004275191,0.000010567803,0.000021573762,0.000021451835,0.0014977851],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924057,0.004795728,0.00028060304,0.00054268906,0.0013414518,0.00063381466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97720283,0.012280572,0.005043274,0.0020708255,0.0018024652,0.0016000436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006259839,0.00031377852,0.00036340952,0.0013195411,0.0041326056,0.0090778535,0.0005143716,0.0020099154,0.009530503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027555406,0.0003129358,0.00037878758,0.0010697978,0.01191665,0.011240013,0.005228539,0.0028131506,0.0009551926],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032965295,0.00018117216,0.14750819,0.00044689197,0.00009771901,0.0007583626,0.65806097,0.00021110929,0.0043103173,0.12114482,0.009537419,0.057413325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034804078,0.0002072409,0.12517694,0.0005407014,0.00008286454,0.0010540833,0.6910538,0.00089179154,0.0017580551,0.050866473,0.128196,0.0001372666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035830357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036576095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009530503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020204019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011160978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03310561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093209147","doi":"10.16997/jdd.395","title":"Participatory Deliberative Democracy in Complex Mass Societies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Democracy; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Variety (cybernetics); Public administration; Political economy; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.18756155035384445,"score_gpt":0.38992476750462635,"score_spread":0.2023632171507819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093209147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12004975,0.0048170392,0.23251721,0.29658416,0.0012856799,0.000355724,0.00013592468,0.00018110884,0.34407339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669834,0.00079780683,0.01938164,0.0051923296,0.00026858546,0.0002234957,0.000029700353,0.000034230507,0.0070888405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.973959,0.020661965,0.00030429495,0.001808784,0.0015849846,0.0016809076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9825232,0.011364731,0.0015250063,0.0025095167,0.0011272769,0.000950381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023303414,0.0004025752,0.0006107192,0.00088246295,0.0072927778,0.010185697,0.00138171,0.005718574,0.0036733358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024204839,0.00040961607,0.00084253354,0.0008482493,0.027054382,0.015503117,0.0077859345,0.006009136,0.0006354056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011560506,0.00001275781,0.00031400227,0.0000344166,0.000009841938,0.000079894184,0.0030405293,0.0013703603,0.000070946946,0.9899933,0.0014923053,0.0035701424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015383275,0.000011046848,0.00016440186,0.000054682867,0.0000032203518,0.000025361476,0.0009562375,0.0014325028,0.000117388656,0.975662,0.021549465,0.000008344923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021709152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020147974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023303414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053758794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042953417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12324172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146587215","doi":"10.16997/10.16997/jdd.949","title":"Diverse Discussion in Public Deliberation on Cancer Drug Funding","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Deliberation; Diversity (politics); Public health; Political science; Public health policy; Public policy; Cancer drugs; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Management science; Drug; Health policy; Medicine; Epistemology; Pharmacology; Politics","score_opus":0.4403780437412744,"score_gpt":0.47641783969507207,"score_spread":0.03603979595379764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146587215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86996627,0.0013744164,0.014269783,0.040917333,0.00045933967,0.00034409924,0.00017917335,0.00011639578,0.07237315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99665195,0.00017381333,0.0008559049,0.0009699246,0.000037623842,0.000084852,0.00003227106,0.000033203716,0.0011604687],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8452328,0.12521747,0.0030032215,0.0035646814,0.013009388,0.009972518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7748816,0.1869812,0.01627753,0.0047656,0.009662267,0.007431863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.064575404,0.0007865551,0.0009236337,0.0043567624,0.03165874,0.012169838,0.0020673522,0.005479171,0.003585498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13634188,0.00071416004,0.00082655135,0.004708824,0.043294057,0.008486379,0.020051708,0.010015812,0.00038114094],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001190329,0.000029218432,0.0049588843,0.00012351558,0.00002475396,0.00044617613,0.96283805,0.00031421587,0.000553641,0.021165261,0.0016600268,0.0077673704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000341953,0.00004205419,0.0062275454,0.00031061444,0.000018409984,0.00015357602,0.9158908,0.0006285739,0.0007106049,0.025752181,0.05014593,0.0000855683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079610504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07618517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079610504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0331537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030016793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3415115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154282876","doi":"10.16997/jdd.971","title":"Expertise and Participatory Governance: The Incorporation of Expert Knowledge in Local Participatory Processes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Public Policy and Administration Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Democratization; Corporate governance; Local governance; Participatory GIS; Knowledge management; Political science; Process (computing); Democracy; Sociology; Business; Computer science; Public administration; Local government; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.12120231885152614,"score_gpt":0.43349603710716444,"score_spread":0.3122937182556383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154282876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4161114,0.0028668165,0.20246647,0.031063944,0.00027272507,0.0010569537,0.00010321352,0.00018225904,0.34587616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98516417,0.00020671291,0.011204808,0.00047266454,0.000037722984,0.00016660997,0.000014023913,0.000021268312,0.002711918],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8038576,0.17619358,0.002845889,0.005225256,0.0072217444,0.004655952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7825785,0.17914975,0.01200135,0.015355307,0.008010198,0.00290485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09503794,0.00040847278,0.00058061635,0.004215986,0.0067113577,0.010566031,0.0017605125,0.0031906397,0.0030410024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1307816,0.00049885624,0.00058033783,0.0027309032,0.02426565,0.010736207,0.014196697,0.0028761674,0.00042766385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027308564,0.00024353008,0.022283409,0.0008598309,0.00009728378,0.0011598427,0.43054837,0.0052869534,0.00208497,0.3118936,0.0020966607,0.22317241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017674826,0.00049518206,0.025784973,0.0027472295,0.00012416962,0.00065225887,0.14742827,0.008504051,0.003359924,0.6619104,0.14858761,0.00022912506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003835051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00590195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09503794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008922964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010450351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5026146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200939096","doi":"10.16997/10.16997/jdd.1043","title":"Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Scholarship; Satisficing; Impartiality; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Legitimacy; Social psychology; Quality (philosophy); Public engagement; Test (biology); Political science; Public relations; Democracy; Epistemology; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08109871442850337,"score_gpt":0.379265197670663,"score_spread":0.29816648324215966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200939096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618118,0.00067904533,0.012617643,0.005509526,0.00024595505,0.00045966182,0.00025134816,0.0001033175,0.018321749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99518126,0.00007673028,0.0023919162,0.00052324834,0.00007465271,0.0005597438,0.00009569358,0.000051428913,0.001045237],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.82317764,0.14447229,0.005638962,0.0062804427,0.017013393,0.0034173639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51270145,0.34272882,0.055444445,0.05250078,0.03348925,0.0031352255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1276468,0.0003565963,0.0007385933,0.0024634793,0.0041754893,0.007786351,0.0012690091,0.0013492235,0.0030717752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.40750018,0.0005822304,0.00077626563,0.0026486106,0.006246878,0.006552391,0.00680138,0.0026634738,0.0005119167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016505508,0.00038979086,0.18707673,0.0013074238,0.00041135642,0.00069814443,0.62754977,0.0006556652,0.0049171257,0.035152737,0.009103532,0.1310872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001727135,0.0010311998,0.42689583,0.0014605459,0.00024804546,0.00059571635,0.40625513,0.0055647157,0.0077631986,0.0479649,0.10163044,0.0004175985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036540402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064195683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8723532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003968091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003742063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67506886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334855578","doi":"10.16997/jdd.70","title":"Crackpot or Genius? Canada Steps onto the World Stage as a Democratic Innovator","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Innovator; Genius; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public administration; Democratic deficit; Law; Politics; Entrepreneurship; Psychology","score_opus":0.033196194712121124,"score_gpt":0.31232270543572727,"score_spread":0.27912651072360617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334855578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043358426,0.0058728233,0.0003385163,0.9160384,0.001479099,0.00002053126,0.00016163122,0.000027082997,0.07172605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.332804,0.01768993,0.002469897,0.47644922,0.0012682866,0.00007399042,0.00024395972,0.00016735987,0.16883333],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99314404,0.001007343,0.00009288246,0.0004618975,0.002341496,0.0029523617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919194,0.0014917313,0.00019889805,0.00021920558,0.0031892948,0.0029814006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00530883,0.00039542062,0.00046146638,0.0013083185,0.021283546,0.017799204,0.0019179117,0.008880193,0.011333517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010308149,0.00023243538,0.00050793664,0.0024322916,0.011725173,0.0064520715,0.0038871064,0.009738532,0.0010891368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035536443,0.000018501127,0.0013288804,0.000053098014,0.000008093635,0.00013308557,0.005474499,0.00019829939,0.000114494236,0.34695378,0.6320478,0.013633984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019042021,0.00001032538,0.0028633266,0.00025293854,0.000013521128,0.000032123688,0.014400601,0.0002151763,0.00019330393,0.036142834,0.94579726,0.000059509082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95986414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98055446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091703825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.091703825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19360529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6653609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W35669232","doi":"10.16997/jdd.116","title":"Deliberating Future Issues: Minipublics and Salmon Genomics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Dilemma; Public relations; Political science; Public engagement; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.045550161492544594,"score_gpt":0.32508979159449386,"score_spread":0.27953963010194927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W35669232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57063013,0.0017064541,0.24188702,0.03608075,0.000742824,0.0017492721,0.0004827282,0.0008861583,0.14583468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683146,0.00024810512,0.022894247,0.0012861044,0.00016439286,0.0012223849,0.00016632353,0.0001546294,0.005549289],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8650049,0.11865691,0.0030668178,0.0049404562,0.0055327737,0.0027981647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.58484817,0.36259604,0.021597885,0.020678395,0.006050058,0.004229543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09665064,0.0009056235,0.0008191797,0.0032308365,0.009320658,0.011163162,0.0030184786,0.005218573,0.010645398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16884263,0.0011682705,0.001057766,0.0026942857,0.021677721,0.02304172,0.01762951,0.0057371864,0.0011049076],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066900125,0.00041885392,0.025138749,0.001426208,0.00010593387,0.001715669,0.53198475,0.0040300176,0.0027869192,0.3141023,0.010752655,0.10686897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017471188,0.00057813554,0.017474402,0.0013635427,0.00011344248,0.000961272,0.2715683,0.01054227,0.0038106258,0.37240502,0.32074848,0.00025977957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019333011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00283028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09665064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075184763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00473625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51114357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220858112","doi":"10.16997/jdd.949","title":"Diverse Discussion in Public Deliberation on Cancer Drug Funding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Provincial Health Services Authority; McMaster University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Deliberation; Diversity (politics); Political science; Public health; Public policy; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Management science; Sociology; Epistemology; Medicine; Politics; Engineering","score_opus":0.14340784553427793,"score_gpt":0.35253691389532477,"score_spread":0.20912906836104683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220858112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85448796,0.0014416347,0.013102809,0.045138866,0.0004113438,0.00036491588,0.00018798544,0.00008516493,0.08477933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963074,0.00016748297,0.0008306706,0.0010731168,0.000035893783,0.00010111854,0.000028659104,0.000027433012,0.0014282851],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.833531,0.1354836,0.003021725,0.003726306,0.012262491,0.011974913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77192,0.19256993,0.014912451,0.0048210477,0.008537944,0.007238547],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069229074,0.00074293715,0.0010144559,0.004298365,0.03845593,0.0118482625,0.0021121467,0.005438669,0.0036736538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1348349,0.0006654559,0.000763156,0.0046442896,0.04997376,0.00795777,0.022290487,0.009232786,0.0003495592],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010677286,0.000025489626,0.0051723286,0.00011038241,0.000019640958,0.0004949754,0.9536419,0.00026193517,0.00039503342,0.030315785,0.001636938,0.007818813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032189775,0.00003512764,0.006390432,0.00037397543,0.000015779317,0.00014630948,0.90162575,0.00053686625,0.0006715202,0.034953438,0.055145722,0.000072935974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.098306514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.105346896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.098306514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038934965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037595477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36612272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220900416","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1043","title":"Mini-Public Replication: Emotions and Deliberation in the Citizens' Initiative Review Redux","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Deliberative democracy; Scholarship; Satisficing; Impartiality; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Legitimacy; Quality (philosophy); Social psychology; Public engagement; Test (biology); Political science; Public relations; Democracy; Epistemology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.07673279628731786,"score_gpt":0.36970452867543463,"score_spread":0.2929717323881168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220900416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619787,0.00067644246,0.012572689,0.005483235,0.00024508304,0.00045780645,0.0002501878,0.00010321724,0.0182326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951923,0.00007640684,0.002388337,0.00052189507,0.00007445545,0.00055726996,0.00009544272,0.000051338724,0.0010425949],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.82362646,0.14406207,0.00562407,0.0062700836,0.017002769,0.0034145152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.51364076,0.34185076,0.055442546,0.052456114,0.033474285,0.003135545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12742859,0.00035687877,0.0007382885,0.0024615359,0.0041733244,0.0077824285,0.001268858,0.0013489011,0.0030673512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4066584,0.0005822254,0.0007761332,0.0026446332,0.0062325434,0.006547433,0.0067905593,0.0026633788,0.0005112172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016499126,0.0003897481,0.18731636,0.0013036419,0.00041136172,0.00069909747,0.62745315,0.00065596576,0.0049185148,0.035014417,0.009079618,0.13110824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017237884,0.0010313281,0.42713135,0.0014564127,0.0002480897,0.00059654145,0.406535,0.00557355,0.0077572847,0.047799725,0.10128094,0.00041739774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003658951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064217467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12742859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003967415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037400757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67391485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241962641","doi":"10.16997/jdd.82","title":"Pyramidal Democracy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Polity; Delegate; Pyramid (geometry); Democracy; Legislature; Political science; Public administration; Deliberation; Hierarchy; Deliberative democracy; Direct democracy; Group (periodic table); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Law; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009085778772102763,"score_gpt":0.2855816124780604,"score_spread":0.27649583370595765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241962641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050439972,0.0011526848,0.36112556,0.015439165,0.0005491136,0.00027657681,0.0003817257,0.0007024509,0.56993276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88810986,0.0010484323,0.049979266,0.0020490363,0.0003287161,0.00034054724,0.00024265691,0.000108836924,0.05779262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752814,0.00075713167,0.000086700624,0.0006339023,0.0006251131,0.00036899513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980453,0.00041023098,0.00027428122,0.00061325653,0.00035248985,0.0003044628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001959801,0.00029876747,0.00037056144,0.0005234089,0.0018361589,0.0032799577,0.0011125718,0.0011757604,0.013009662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054986198,0.0001922979,0.00056867616,0.0006480013,0.0031639105,0.0029934836,0.004284982,0.0017928461,0.0028010018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019610647,0.000026247555,0.0006405556,0.000064943866,0.000017275597,0.000042997548,0.0003584597,0.003513316,0.00026601984,0.9683072,0.0056635113,0.021079943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048247424,0.000055846212,0.0006334195,0.00007022557,0.000017866247,0.000071131195,0.00022871347,0.012454204,0.0005184389,0.89136034,0.09452712,0.00001445038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014880444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019640408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013009662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00201281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023855122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043521702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246755408","doi":"10.16997/jdd.384","title":"Book Reviews Volume 16, Issue 1","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Scholarship; Democracy; Miller; Deliberative democracy; Politics; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04359663490131852,"score_gpt":0.3490384361508882,"score_spread":0.30544180124956966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246755408","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002681628,0.4547802,0.00089853327,0.02888328,0.102601066,0.00012327239,0.0015104593,0.0004468769,0.41048825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017216566,0.2707636,0.0010725209,0.022925692,0.032530606,0.0001517048,0.0022711502,0.00041511044,0.66814804],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773335,0.00023467523,0.0001288191,0.0002939512,0.0014695367,0.00013967323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672526,0.00076188846,0.0001922829,0.0002527899,0.001643213,0.00042455917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011087023,0.0012086101,0.001615339,0.0041947737,0.001590704,0.007432417,0.0020837588,0.0033098308,0.3156974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073575047,0.0006481082,0.0009294938,0.0072824485,0.0011649445,0.004591566,0.0025830963,0.0041535664,0.28227094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007071334,0.0000151536415,0.000027117045,0.00052402465,0.000004286388,0.000014015336,0.000036315796,0.000025492405,0.000099105026,0.0024332833,0.921719,0.0750951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001501616,0.0000031101983,0.00004323644,0.00031288996,0.0000014514104,0.000021174857,0.000019057072,0.00000350224,0.000010872474,0.0003377272,0.9992434,0.0000020871248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026411854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005573016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3156974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019273793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003493863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9760746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286424219","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1208","title":"The Discursive Functions of Deliberative Voting","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Public Health Ontario; University of Toronto","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation","keywords":"Deliberation; Voting; Facilitator; Deliberative democracy; Political science; Process (computing); Public relations; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.023241627047532232,"score_gpt":0.32340118447059624,"score_spread":0.300159557423064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286424219","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18871273,0.0014127822,0.4306948,0.0183753,0.0004994538,0.00079245935,0.00016398019,0.0003486108,0.35899988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745564,0.0002116584,0.020090248,0.00046898855,0.00011710991,0.00039870947,0.000044695815,0.000098119235,0.0040141526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8892839,0.09035789,0.0028949035,0.0056936275,0.008893486,0.0028761798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82916576,0.1286309,0.01327092,0.020360334,0.006819688,0.0017523746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05164145,0.00096242566,0.00072435447,0.0046387645,0.006849235,0.011428689,0.0029293378,0.0029268127,0.0051016137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12601365,0.00064774114,0.001129054,0.0034243849,0.031408727,0.013643668,0.008832978,0.0043827817,0.0010652301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016574477,0.00006658923,0.0041216477,0.00035993784,0.000054072058,0.00018938887,0.109053895,0.0015131232,0.001854003,0.8278919,0.0009802907,0.053749375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008255207,0.00014223144,0.0040353155,0.00055840006,0.00006422298,0.00025351968,0.036279056,0.0053726626,0.0046177246,0.8654405,0.08304823,0.00010562478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015121404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010736847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05164145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046410174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004182508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27310938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377037164","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1182","title":"Discourse, Deliberation and Difference in an Authoritarian Public Sphere","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Deliberation; Elite; Context (archaeology); Democracy; Public sphere; Political science; Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.03806926227637236,"score_gpt":0.35198839289892614,"score_spread":0.3139191306225538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377037164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5998971,0.003152393,0.0333159,0.027711498,0.00025734503,0.00011956927,0.000050201244,0.0000728683,0.3354231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976699,0.00012420025,0.0006917889,0.0001651388,0.000024554587,0.000017450226,0.0000054914076,0.0000044465855,0.001297121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853894,0.010632779,0.00044126634,0.00094347657,0.0014005571,0.0011925569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916419,0.005524014,0.0010123487,0.00086365466,0.00045140096,0.00050657976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017646752,0.00034515795,0.00050169625,0.0020417278,0.0072407387,0.007584456,0.0009619898,0.0018516409,0.0019485173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009071316,0.00023055729,0.0003513974,0.0019219312,0.052533757,0.008631316,0.008609421,0.0027019586,0.00015067944],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032366326,0.000020267797,0.0014767322,0.000052723397,0.000009401485,0.000090187095,0.07156294,0.00041150188,0.0003133776,0.9177175,0.0003070612,0.008005954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051758096,0.00007564171,0.0042169765,0.0002085,0.000020971536,0.00009054267,0.053028554,0.0017151423,0.0010356379,0.89323103,0.046288732,0.000036623107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031524294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021630453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017646752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007371755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067536207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09332603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383961755","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1335","title":"The Influence of Leaders on the Quality of Citizen Deliberation: An Exploratory Assessment of Online Deliberation in New Zealand","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Quality (philosophy); Exploratory research; Exploratory analysis; Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.11092131712741807,"score_gpt":0.43909415951078457,"score_spread":0.3281728423833665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383961755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998207,0.00001974751,0.00008245293,0.000068707166,0.0000016221155,0.00005858504,0.000013823478,0.0000024541544,0.0015456851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984622,0.000071674614,0.00034124253,0.000027288623,0.0000033213037,0.00012174114,0.000022112536,0.000006117587,0.00094423286],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933623,0.0029221661,0.0006194095,0.00043090075,0.0017551786,0.0009099964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765313,0.012416734,0.0051691937,0.00096976507,0.0031361685,0.0017769085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009508266,0.00032649864,0.00045425378,0.00218554,0.0035576883,0.0035018376,0.00085347664,0.00055757654,0.0023255397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030790076,0.00051573815,0.0004364161,0.0014246616,0.004389697,0.0021227004,0.004234739,0.0012397115,0.00027663066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000214961,0.00028551565,0.1256362,0.00018644106,0.000021181299,0.0008965926,0.85478616,0.00006607215,0.0022541196,0.0003519245,0.00019988378,0.015100882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023920209,0.0005564149,0.38036737,0.00010746981,0.000023366365,0.00016604392,0.61247486,0.0003456582,0.00085912,0.00023570852,0.004776065,0.000064079766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07004456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11712592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07004456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053659393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053415303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13927376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404414688","doi":"10.16997/jdd.1603","title":"Deliberative Democracy in Practice: Handbooks on Commissioning, Facilitating, and Evaluating Deliberative Processes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Irish and British Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"United Nations Democracy Fund","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03755812200973334,"score_gpt":0.4036957118175656,"score_spread":0.36613758980783223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404414688","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034825862,0.3230019,0.30115047,0.06916232,0.005234259,0.0026815233,0.0006564881,0.001547861,0.29308254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0710138,0.39807853,0.4463395,0.017356299,0.0028587482,0.009941728,0.0012196987,0.0013975729,0.051794086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92945814,0.047721285,0.0070209173,0.0020473988,0.011991052,0.0017611632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90630823,0.077528834,0.0038168808,0.006210268,0.004825251,0.0013105384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039856117,0.0025523822,0.0023803886,0.010424947,0.0049018734,0.014224244,0.00465002,0.009154121,0.008292982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060869712,0.001666158,0.0013950639,0.016634475,0.037121717,0.01851842,0.009432493,0.009392666,0.0070690215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047566275,0.00017734116,0.0004291855,0.008782982,0.000032074888,0.0002629644,0.03751907,0.002407479,0.00063983805,0.57760364,0.111308165,0.26078972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015212624,0.000045076657,0.00032859974,0.007988219,0.000008117896,0.00030127796,0.006827882,0.0002800907,0.00033582942,0.18044384,0.80338,0.000045886045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055505377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008239635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039856117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01134324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21078181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W82525739","doi":"10.16997/jdd.171","title":"The Politics of Subnational Decentralization in France, Brazil, and Italy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Decentralization; Civil society; Politics; Ideology; Corporate governance; Dialectic; Democracy; Public administration; Political science; State (computer science); Political economy; Citizen journalism; Sociology; Economic system; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.01070962793785138,"score_gpt":0.31913855470685576,"score_spread":0.30842892676900435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W82525739","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8619158,0.0037269748,0.0012091135,0.013988886,0.000039730578,0.00005234907,0.00008344728,0.00007090513,0.1189128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955668,0.00029702095,0.00020434071,0.00038596216,0.000016542104,0.000015865466,0.000020521218,0.0000082508095,0.003484662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976667,0.0008850434,0.000063395586,0.00025632765,0.00023690183,0.0008916166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982823,0.0004932328,0.00049631915,0.00016534782,0.00023442555,0.0003283737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036917443,0.00022068083,0.0003692211,0.0014116485,0.004435689,0.0034654515,0.00042394857,0.0007876397,0.002403229],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005168557,0.00024080514,0.00039341336,0.0013109004,0.0054199346,0.0016372716,0.0047862735,0.0014095649,0.00012720608],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029837416,0.000104028804,0.0629154,0.00029747037,0.00009463028,0.0013746235,0.07064135,0.0028184687,0.0021509726,0.79104817,0.0057102246,0.06254632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001924029,0.00025471338,0.5901429,0.0006518293,0.00018483984,0.00097288773,0.046986528,0.0043042917,0.0022300566,0.04283772,0.31112725,0.00011445378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17726973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21798018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17726973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019409934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005573143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35247582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W946594587","doi":"10.16997/jdd.157","title":"Public Deliberation in Health Policy and Bioethics: Mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Deliberative Democracy","topic":"Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Scholarship; Bioethics; Public health; Diversity (politics); Discipline; Political science; Field (mathematics); Health policy; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Health care; Social science; Medicine; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.30564321565661784,"score_gpt":0.4936459133612777,"score_spread":0.18800269770465988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W946594587","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08651646,0.17543343,0.13117747,0.4662099,0.0025830048,0.00044989152,0.00015720572,0.0002383726,0.13723429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9025278,0.054261554,0.025913408,0.013252748,0.0010217483,0.00046775967,0.00009222877,0.0001558634,0.002306808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8215013,0.15232389,0.0048045586,0.0068680863,0.009393449,0.005108752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.66131204,0.3073842,0.008545563,0.012033775,0.006471939,0.004252502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12079339,0.00093264,0.0024439946,0.011091893,0.017658602,0.035000466,0.004335197,0.012572085,0.0044137915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.097695366,0.0012015136,0.0015504261,0.019706504,0.11202022,0.046209972,0.029167483,0.016513117,0.0007739711],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006244813,0.0001138061,0.002419855,0.0027869123,0.00006277559,0.00039462905,0.17657082,0.001345871,0.00022429024,0.7310418,0.0035344681,0.081442274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022770304,0.00009325946,0.0020550452,0.0075226333,0.000027404454,0.00045844066,0.18494667,0.0013600868,0.00043428992,0.65369654,0.14927924,0.00010351747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004526272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003995947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12079339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019812485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038945913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6388241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}