{"meta":{"query_hash":"205ab32ac7f0","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Didactics of Philosophy"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/205ab32ac7f0","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Didactics+of+Philosophy"},"results":[{"id":"W4297495547","doi":"10.46586/jdph.2022.9866","title":"Complexity, Dialogue, and Democracy: The Educational Implications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Didactics of Philosophy","topic":"Education and Critical Thinking Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Ideal (ethics); Viewpoints; Sociology; Charter; Epistemology; Mandate; CONTEST; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.08032859062965131,"score_gpt":0.3627001393207206,"score_spread":0.2823715486910693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297495547","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022299102,0.038551774,0.009015023,0.7510715,0.0012421544,0.000059439455,0.00005844331,0.000049258626,0.17765328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93454766,0.019598145,0.0054034153,0.025974067,0.0018843584,0.00016855015,0.000034719058,0.00004045466,0.012348805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247384,0.0056425813,0.00018266765,0.00036327142,0.0008270042,0.0005107134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9557206,0.038136452,0.0014274326,0.00089134224,0.0014023698,0.0024217968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007814566,0.0005837958,0.00054978015,0.0026130439,0.0062263743,0.009544931,0.0014108085,0.004527108,0.010948904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016787315,0.00029573822,0.0004765974,0.0015216056,0.039379265,0.020697277,0.009732422,0.008716633,0.0006888171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021243404,0.0000573363,0.00077125925,0.00017715107,0.000006268642,0.00015865202,0.0116051445,0.00028263126,0.000043160264,0.96377134,0.006912225,0.016193561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001877914,0.000016714892,0.0007396584,0.0005062589,0.00000540287,0.00015781644,0.01522654,0.00039296638,0.000131655,0.93074167,0.05204667,0.000015950163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004128185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040271594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010948904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006954141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060837814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050456107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399634084","doi":"10.46586/jdph.2024.11354","title":"Education in the Age of Woke","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Didactics of Philosophy","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of the Fraser Valley; Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Pride; Enlightenment; Argument (complex analysis); Politics; Epistemology; Focus (optics); Sociology; Tone (literature); Aesthetics; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06502857973483839,"score_gpt":0.3933535738701608,"score_spread":0.3283249941353224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399634084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11643656,0.01197855,0.013263178,0.352287,0.0016106993,0.00004628979,0.00004537053,0.00011838427,0.504214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9338298,0.0029253787,0.0017637826,0.020012157,0.00022629744,0.00002791959,0.000016353426,0.00005903479,0.04113935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948087,0.0024474014,0.000070953785,0.0003877059,0.0005626468,0.0017226535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633706,0.0015551272,0.0003322564,0.0002919084,0.00042522192,0.0010584878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006196386,0.00041944656,0.0004701526,0.001311879,0.024846852,0.012505047,0.0010227067,0.0055248644,0.006718911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008048748,0.00032465244,0.0003395419,0.0013005524,0.052702904,0.01738041,0.014165938,0.014967249,0.0011397146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015585478,0.000021511732,0.00041183192,0.000037765323,0.0000021164585,0.00014827179,0.13356577,0.00007964281,0.00010605626,0.8502144,0.0062620896,0.0091349045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010265732,0.000027323145,0.00071972795,0.0003852281,0.000004910356,0.00019130897,0.13001072,0.00019645854,0.00029371312,0.33384642,0.5342858,0.000028189696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048141763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0790605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048141763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013563125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016161196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098407805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412924725","doi":"10.46586/jdph.2025.12139","title":"Educating For Self-Legislation Within An Emotional Landscape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Didactics of Philosophy","topic":"Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Capilano University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0382597354381124,"score_gpt":0.3488296755211259,"score_spread":0.31056994008301353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412924725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14541553,0.004052985,0.12237055,0.25055957,0.0017717177,0.0001984965,0.000036907564,0.000694886,0.4748993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9248535,0.0017682491,0.024567107,0.019618953,0.00030597288,0.0001297538,0.000029544304,0.000168601,0.028558295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476504,0.003519561,0.00008126983,0.00031705227,0.0007592046,0.0005579122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503374,0.00225715,0.00051089167,0.0005772269,0.0006180991,0.0010028678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0097628925,0.0003610348,0.00038116655,0.00085141667,0.004634724,0.007063066,0.0009189393,0.0028968097,0.0053271344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008436471,0.00029489442,0.00061460404,0.00029703582,0.021483123,0.009435808,0.007841137,0.010425912,0.0020302518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002183053,0.00037965583,0.0019607798,0.00014669169,0.00001310101,0.00051933713,0.1702575,0.00043276857,0.0026927844,0.74992716,0.022014419,0.05163399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026360833,0.000141158,0.0018715134,0.00046565817,0.000016295,0.00071784086,0.058455635,0.0007908669,0.001983375,0.4878719,0.44761896,0.00004028335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005060879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077261217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0097628925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020110952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032551852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05163175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}