{"meta":{"query_hash":"2a7a179112f1","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2a7a179112f1","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Digital+Learning+in+Teacher+Education"},"results":[{"id":"W2005478706","doi":"10.1080/21532974.2012.10784686","title":"Facebook","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","topic":"Impact of Technology on Adolescents","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":181,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.02234697035196381,"score_gpt":0.3473850424066775,"score_spread":0.3250380720547137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2005478706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88565195,0.00024928906,0.000049493534,0.0018970007,0.0006833012,0.00008387216,8.360176e-8,0.0000295004,0.111355506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829838,0.000014402827,0.00013605008,0.000043224183,0.00041393124,0.0000014476693,5.0768017e-7,0.000007333128,0.016399262],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991986,0.0001034148,0.00020832111,0.00003984912,0.00022755328,0.00022225654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948364,0.000034403507,0.0002589936,0.000047368303,0.00007092495,0.000104653496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089562923,0.000051903215,0.00009172812,0.00017481379,0.0000855682,0.00009107711,0.00015830937,0.00009067635,0.00010119144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014235085,0.00005038721,0.00004409846,0.00015266267,0.00007949902,0.0011615993,0.00001382827,0.0004691362,0.0000762163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052828123,0.00035123364,0.84830433,0.000001998385,0.0000034309915,2.7482716e-7,0.0071409694,0.0000043876303,0.000031208878,0.0002895373,0.0016019345,0.14226542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029900626,0.000070059745,0.6386209,0.000113011876,0.000011368658,0.000023919509,0.03880219,0.000002108772,0.00010131654,0.0010201609,0.32078534,0.00015055873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026598605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000041280723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3191834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029395503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003661316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20547308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298365694","doi":"10.1080/21532974.2016.1138914","title":"Reimagining Understandings of Literacy in Teacher Preparation Programs Using Digital Literacy Autobiographies","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Literacy; Variety (cybernetics); Pedagogy; Information literacy; Critical literacy; Mathematics education; Teacher education; Sociology; Literacy education; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03127591835487989,"score_gpt":0.3063317931796289,"score_spread":0.275055874824749,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298365694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99444145,0.0003801765,0.00016477781,0.00060512766,0.00093951664,0.00016311853,0.0000026602,0.00002598347,0.0032772138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926444,0.000023571898,0.0002549883,0.00001385161,0.0008712386,0.0000075075473,0.00003044513,0.00002885918,0.0061250986],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819785,0.00009239905,0.00095017464,0.00020061742,0.00030448358,0.0002544719],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983671,0.00014084022,0.000884134,0.00013190735,0.00039635875,0.000079710575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052710593,0.0001869131,0.00028649013,0.0010148451,0.00007455702,0.0010085239,0.00016036363,0.00006833206,0.000097181764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004625177,0.00013006572,0.00013402675,0.0002709136,0.00020281557,0.007393117,0.000023191871,0.0004011205,0.0000061374853],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000802824,0.0007912304,0.46264967,0.00005060102,0.00001897514,0.0000012233877,0.34211883,0.000014373519,0.000052305913,0.00035519776,0.000113818765,0.1937535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005297403,0.0024913477,0.16454178,0.014875079,0.00022062409,0.00024376919,0.63648134,0.0015897477,0.00031889023,0.037647303,0.13427944,0.0020132903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007080355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011613975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29810786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032716634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042665124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9725219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406321163","doi":"10.1080/21532974.2025.2452531","title":"“Student engagement is off the charts!”: understanding the co-design and implementation of a data science Pokémon unit for second graders","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Unit (ring theory); Mathematics education; Student engagement; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.29274984280108496,"score_gpt":0.5231379856863557,"score_spread":0.23038814288527076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406321163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581466,0.0003425267,0.01916833,0.019684741,0.0004663955,0.00068730465,0.00000694459,0.0000031168518,0.0014940466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979285,0.000022915008,0.0004037483,0.00020816062,0.000059020957,0.000013857552,0.0000065402223,0.000004159826,0.0013531011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979981,0.00019072722,0.00065999565,0.00020676164,0.00080738286,0.00013702198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973459,0.0013500268,0.00070642494,0.00025679587,0.00030646258,0.000034356937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009346791,0.00008201686,0.00012984879,0.00039021322,0.00031710247,0.00066829094,0.000850127,0.000017953535,0.000063122774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007781284,0.00004743829,0.00003736577,0.0006105248,0.00017589542,0.0016001739,0.00012751945,0.00022941838,7.956667e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055383804,0.00058546057,0.7007571,0.00002958568,0.000085741085,1.02792804e-7,0.042525243,0.0002527964,0.0013196776,0.011400015,0.016999545,0.22598937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006218799,0.00027657166,0.39209488,0.00007745943,0.00004581959,0.0000032525782,0.5636966,0.0010048305,0.00072952895,0.022757396,0.018591626,0.00010014726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000633414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049629716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5211714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022296741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00141565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64443445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}