{"meta":{"query_hash":"57893008c7c3","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Documentation"},"cohort_total":103,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":103,"exported":103,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/57893008c7c3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Documentation"},"results":[{"id":"W1531228058","doi":"10.1108/00220410710723902","title":"Purls of wisdom","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Collectivism; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Naturalistic observation; Value (mathematics); Field (mathematics); Social constructivism; Social psychology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social science; Individualism","score_opus":0.010825590179941199,"score_gpt":0.32302810294779455,"score_spread":0.3122025127678533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531228058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50242656,0.000016312368,0.49517432,0.0003704363,0.0003437479,0.00003311918,1.1147445e-7,0.000008847815,0.0016265285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9678563,0.0000048107368,0.03190989,0.000096039206,0.000058828744,2.7352996e-7,3.8902556e-7,0.0000023245418,0.000071150316],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991481,0.000021841355,0.00045304163,0.000055358178,0.00024081681,0.00008085638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987341,0.000056003486,0.00075115927,0.00009863922,0.0003439798,0.000016088386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007298709,0.000044554592,0.00009315979,0.00037180015,0.00002665575,0.000026745405,0.00026157408,0.000035542755,0.000038324484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000454805,0.00003950912,0.000039743016,0.000267787,0.000033561886,0.0013828111,0.000020182953,0.00013366385,0.000012529292],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001192656,0.00022673197,0.009279131,0.000022954708,0.00013003711,0.00006996065,0.0034373116,0.000074797616,0.63221025,0.21890165,0.004392043,0.13113588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074827665,0.0005166243,0.02948809,0.000042959466,0.000009915213,0.0002404568,0.00044412332,0.00012770732,0.94711924,0.019215569,0.0019724872,0.00007455608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029274397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017843688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46542972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080900514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026650598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16111352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540888225","doi":"10.1108/00220411211277028","title":"Archiving electroacoustic and mixed music","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Music Technology and Sound Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Electroacoustic music; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Relevance (law); Usability; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Originality; Human–computer interaction; Sociology; Visual arts; Art; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.01391372146500788,"score_gpt":0.25713727317494667,"score_spread":0.24322355170993878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540888225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75875676,0.0005410138,0.2397221,0.0003943497,0.00029082948,0.000021079799,4.6247457e-8,0.0000115202365,0.00026227703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834012,0.00005608494,0.016311985,0.00010952797,0.00008500901,7.548478e-7,7.1394375e-8,0.0000013929895,0.000033993856],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958646,0.000029432831,0.00013685325,0.000039313505,0.00009998077,0.000107980195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969345,0.00006265278,0.00013247153,0.000053535325,0.00002693183,0.000030952087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028101535,0.000038453047,0.000071969545,0.000089175504,0.00007370785,0.000037005706,0.00010630299,0.000016612685,0.00000479573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039566214,0.000030640313,0.000019179572,0.000079648475,0.000021848715,0.00071993883,0.00003977019,0.00008809102,0.0000021577703],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039533606,0.00025532203,0.075379975,0.00006271245,0.0003050023,0.000024913023,0.036508474,0.000052183987,0.036030225,0.2581939,0.0101425685,0.5830052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022520444,0.00090702367,0.8434419,0.000105026505,0.00015504415,0.0015922418,0.0024144964,0.0026093025,0.010446848,0.12861212,0.0070185796,0.0004453594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000013373876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015983742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76806194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017719462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001033636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12494756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550385268","doi":"10.1108/jd-01-2014-0018","title":"Social semiotics as theory and practice in library and information science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Multimedia Communication and Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Originality; Social semiotics; Computer science; Information science; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Data science; Epistemology; Social science; Qualitative research; Library science","score_opus":0.02474796014636087,"score_gpt":0.40502495637253083,"score_spread":0.38027699622616995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550385268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86333394,0.0003285701,0.00017976426,0.04538331,0.00014374945,0.00013093311,2.8811144e-7,0.000017740542,0.09048169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949431,0.0014948552,0.002932228,0.00056765607,0.000032169788,5.429311e-7,5.368699e-7,0.0000011072444,0.000027795497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992757,0.00025965695,0.00016560844,0.000024823194,0.00021654587,0.000057704212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992376,0.0003505373,0.00023675775,0.000028541479,0.00009307105,0.000053505733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024484738,0.000022682885,0.000046120025,0.00020655649,0.000121421705,0.00012959106,0.00010190239,0.000034885226,0.0000122079355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025624956,0.000021141113,0.0000051060233,0.00025817862,0.00029998284,0.013748447,0.00003829516,0.00009487141,0.0000024352084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009417324,0.000019950097,0.0028038828,0.000002231506,0.0000033057051,9.93609e-7,0.07560631,0.0000017895488,0.000111070665,0.87519854,0.00016007172,0.045997687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003295877,0.00030420444,0.035009954,0.000047674395,0.000042350257,0.00012013075,0.4490335,0.00015745647,0.00090049976,0.23903218,0.2718587,0.00019748116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025684065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005009664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63616633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003432175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002562232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99672925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967666529","doi":"10.1108/00220411111164664","title":"New labour in libraries: the post‐Fordist public library","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Fordism; Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Austerity; Institution; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Library classification; Meaning (existential); Politics; Political science; Social science; Library science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Economy; Law","score_opus":0.03591734490335279,"score_gpt":0.2681601502433639,"score_spread":0.23224280534001113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967666529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7070829,0.0003828888,0.00011769319,0.024832714,0.00069724745,0.00007781145,0.0000021675069,0.000012906502,0.26679367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98982793,0.000104197825,0.0006993,0.0011803857,0.00038704523,6.1744885e-7,8.613516e-7,0.0000035130338,0.0077961213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942994,0.00007465225,0.00022345046,0.00003846904,0.00009913407,0.00013433342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964327,0.000047921847,0.00013057922,0.000036571313,0.000017737757,0.00012392673],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026629277,0.000035244488,0.00007159407,0.000066521505,0.00014143984,0.00012134131,0.00018917097,0.000028286917,0.004298657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053896325,0.000024532845,0.000047170786,0.00009306736,0.000070209855,0.002426631,0.000012355862,0.000087769,0.000042390348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006168021,0.00005267835,0.029044922,0.0000043750165,0.000017396293,0.000010480418,0.051745806,7.218005e-7,0.000012088909,0.87561965,0.019676298,0.023753878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005596654,0.00012237507,0.11393776,0.000017238404,0.000010197458,0.0000060311077,0.018636081,0.0000018414553,0.000080128026,0.21023229,0.65630645,0.00008996834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013400079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030814155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6653874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047049536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003600556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99661154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973209021","doi":"10.1108/00220411211225575","title":"A review of theoretical models of health information seeking on the web","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Computer science; Originality; Multidisciplinary approach; Management science; Information seeking; Data science; Data collection; The Internet; Information behavior; Knowledge management; Information retrieval; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.14807134702291977,"score_gpt":0.5300043778624344,"score_spread":0.3819330308395146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973209021","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000022060825,0.9901921,0.0030930403,0.0010342805,0.0005320636,0.0019284319,0.00005595653,0.0000058430132,0.0031362036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00061657146,0.993041,0.0004864925,0.005571649,0.00013745572,0.00004593328,0.000081135804,0.00001037358,0.000009408462],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876604,0.0032004863,0.008145424,0.00006168472,0.0006669673,0.00026504623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806771,0.0013702884,0.016677713,0.00030358857,0.0008573779,0.00011389839],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016667003,0.0001939356,0.0015202953,0.00030464394,0.0002101496,0.000012637602,0.0003140879,0.0001823108,0.001031327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007474442,0.00010278425,0.00037467136,0.00040147747,0.000067505294,0.0028045692,0.000050158465,0.0010517611,0.000051860512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019830575,0.00003886318,0.000011586716,0.3053613,0.000040106002,2.3995462e-8,0.0029167999,0.0000018382731,2.4766324e-8,0.03750987,0.00322942,0.6508703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023481913,0.00013233723,0.000009294453,0.2581019,0.00018476622,0.0000052060814,0.0005521745,0.00012313231,1.9638219e-7,0.001218228,0.7393672,0.00007074304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000121429475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.7228997e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73613775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005103561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020415767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978265849","doi":"10.1108/00220410610688750","title":"Aggregation consistency and frequency of Chinese words and characters","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Zipf's law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Syllable; Romanization; Vernacular; Distribution (mathematics); Frequency distribution; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Natural language processing; Data set; Statistics; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition","score_opus":0.004694726306288027,"score_gpt":0.2702126740971309,"score_spread":0.26551794779084287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978265849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79407704,0.000387229,0.20506339,0.00026321303,0.00003291442,0.000041168518,2.6605588e-7,0.000009367539,0.00012544186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91280293,0.00011339748,0.08700774,0.00002658239,0.000028065015,8.085792e-7,9.824826e-7,0.0000023055143,0.000017210266],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993049,0.000031764266,0.00035798707,0.00007692782,0.00017547433,0.00005294403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914324,0.00004396682,0.00059330097,0.000077979894,0.000116883835,0.000024637135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001999274,0.000059241986,0.00013508413,0.00017969651,0.00003074992,0.00005458682,0.00009164113,0.000020657424,0.0000028768836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027665697,0.000048084923,0.00003222767,0.0001866994,0.00003850261,0.0015629521,0.000021202266,0.000051976873,2.0374405e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002684843,0.00014886707,0.49358463,0.000071165305,0.00009765866,0.000028075827,0.0025158292,0.00006309533,0.25053832,0.06395222,0.00007573554,0.18889754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009830666,0.00028765338,0.5857285,0.00010870947,0.00005335081,0.00018270565,0.00011031689,0.0012170881,0.027381184,0.38374528,0.000025205987,0.00017691929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003124856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012448112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31979305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026071548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016917487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19608462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978317631","doi":"10.1108/00220410710743306","title":"Machine learning for Asian language text classification","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Text and Document Classification Technologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Text segmentation; Artificial intelligence; Segmentation; Natural language processing; Language model; Support vector machine; Principle of maximum entropy; Market segmentation; Naive Bayes classifier; Word (group theory); Pattern recognition (psychology); Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02066179093718157,"score_gpt":0.3197743031696622,"score_spread":0.29911251223248064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978317631","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022831835,0.00024358851,0.97183794,0.0033285106,0.00023890426,0.00013991179,4.296693e-7,0.00009195939,0.001286899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9399352,0.000042677937,0.059359852,0.00007800588,0.000077964934,0.0000040082423,0.0000060899715,0.0000058768555,0.00049034576],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999041,0.000027171092,0.00043029143,0.00011270753,0.00024857832,0.00014024436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989243,0.00011151973,0.00062002504,0.0001448393,0.00015406702,0.00004525061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008624198,0.000074430194,0.0001042847,0.00029026787,0.000099995006,0.00016290095,0.00037773608,0.000051399787,0.000019890074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001585734,0.00006391241,0.00007403813,0.00026253265,0.00002040178,0.00117448,0.000026902235,0.00013970757,0.000012497727],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004910182,0.00007238411,0.0034449967,0.00001569845,0.000027943504,0.000005207279,0.002003497,0.000042711472,0.05281972,0.101257615,0.00081136875,0.83944976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009529444,0.003440592,0.22282958,0.00018012636,0.0001578871,0.00035266433,0.02903269,0.04828435,0.4248059,0.07898481,0.181192,0.0012099487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035315693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003864681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91710335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009753708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029788567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26062724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992156462","doi":"10.1108/00220410510578023","title":"“Isms” in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":363,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Metatheory; Constructionism; Constructivism (international relations); Originality; Strict constructionism; Epistemology; Collectivism; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Objectivism; Sociology; Knowledge management; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Individualism","score_opus":0.005605229972077005,"score_gpt":0.2681537019985687,"score_spread":0.2625484720264917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992156462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93099815,0.000018902212,0.06553727,0.0012348491,0.00027237053,0.00014385558,9.1692095e-7,0.000013061616,0.0017806236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739239,0.00003763883,0.025833383,0.00015240206,0.000029220017,0.0000016228329,4.271095e-7,0.0000010481828,0.000020316842],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883646,0.000022417484,0.00045057898,0.000055538178,0.0005079809,0.00012700896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903834,0.000051302362,0.000325524,0.000064269116,0.0004483769,0.00007220977],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007923901,0.0000564783,0.000093979645,0.0007182699,0.00013922577,0.00047527716,0.00018834783,0.00002614482,0.00001680916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013008178,0.000049311682,0.000018179428,0.00089069817,0.00014824896,0.015750395,0.00004318304,0.00013378082,0.00000916534],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053212472,0.000093819435,0.025059473,0.000024168528,0.0000115307475,0.000006162034,0.0145499,0.0005554641,0.00783376,0.109541185,0.0003435946,0.8419277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016921407,0.0018539709,0.6814593,0.00022447787,0.000041693005,0.0053198314,0.0077636414,0.10762218,0.14114383,0.022292964,0.014414046,0.00094263523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006936398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015650552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8409851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001946448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034233247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992860209","doi":"10.1108/00220411211277064","title":"Discourse structure differences in lay and professional health communication","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Sentence; Politeness; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Value (mathematics); Discourse analysis; Originality; Psychology; Nursing research; Sociology; Computer science; Qualitative research; Medicine; Nursing; Social science","score_opus":0.05120499320712839,"score_gpt":0.5114823189936186,"score_spread":0.4602773257864902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992860209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993468,0.0007632061,0.00032775928,0.004350322,0.00053688866,0.00032853533,0.000009059977,0.0000050041526,0.00021123736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950192,0.0002791885,0.002434317,0.0019941833,0.0001430346,0.000008294014,0.000022046304,0.0000038270236,0.00009592339],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971997,0.0009431094,0.0013473473,0.00004625128,0.00023535811,0.00022823797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979125,0.00025768654,0.0014421664,0.00009920918,0.00013222566,0.00015617866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025105325,0.00006962632,0.00019911469,0.00014461053,0.00032238534,0.00001617414,0.00009232169,0.00006973786,0.00040550268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013239031,0.000047402096,0.00001832577,0.00012744156,0.00003401913,0.003180062,0.00003636412,0.00055777025,0.000006060365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006307617,0.0000585337,0.953457,0.00018375958,0.000004198977,5.5093626e-8,0.031534225,0.0000011657819,0.000026302241,0.001515361,0.00130833,0.011848007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008935875,0.000050910145,0.9805345,0.00036801904,0.0000034929642,0.0000035901846,0.0149555905,0.00007401751,0.000009174852,0.0011332119,0.0019273668,0.000046520905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008279413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000061252285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027077531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018883593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026106808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.443997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996025826","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000007123","title":"Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Semiotics; Reciprocal; Sign (mathematics); Citation; Context (archaeology); Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Computer science; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Library science; History; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020804940308397364,"score_gpt":0.3272440855243747,"score_spread":0.3064391452159773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996025826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8392149,0.0005034402,0.15565786,0.0007736068,0.00021664989,0.00008348059,7.2147924e-7,0.000011589512,0.0035377583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328143,0.0013288654,0.065159425,0.00040204695,0.00006919174,3.2253723e-7,5.079012e-7,0.0000026569364,0.00022266236],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990524,0.000045956047,0.0003198637,0.00006564781,0.0004350981,0.00008103881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992619,0.0001547598,0.00020269564,0.00009258933,0.00022241125,0.000065621876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009618762,0.00004848467,0.00009229262,0.0018655739,0.000046947574,0.00024024675,0.00020144643,0.000027045542,0.00011761531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018556883,0.00003982488,0.000032867913,0.004924975,0.000018740608,0.0025396985,0.000022800588,0.00009347994,0.000017198223],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021285501,0.00007291592,0.004891379,0.000015113345,0.000029242705,0.0000065434674,0.0016735502,0.00072662265,0.0001901491,0.0040519326,0.002358947,0.98596233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0087952735,0.006662188,0.6259793,0.00019079789,0.00019396667,0.0010411865,0.001234147,0.15769602,0.019133262,0.13166375,0.04647511,0.000934986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000033861572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.9455805e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9850273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005047922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005461177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23662873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996460024","doi":"10.1108/00220410810844178","title":"Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e‐humanist","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Originality; Computer science; Information and Communications Technology; Interview; Sociology; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Social science; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.0494176736175535,"score_gpt":0.333281641358533,"score_spread":0.2838639677409795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996460024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9523652,0.00019337788,0.0050411527,0.032192215,0.00035544077,0.00019812927,6.3921345e-7,0.0000073581296,0.009646473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900043,0.0005078287,0.00021584392,0.0001411635,0.000034852765,0.000001673739,6.924746e-7,0.0000011278511,0.000096392585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993687,0.00012243775,0.00023831276,0.000012245434,0.00021767513,0.000040629955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991341,0.000063212654,0.0004871159,0.00007499224,0.0002284584,0.0000120963805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053921924,0.000024982359,0.000043298132,0.00011713714,0.00065136026,0.000051431605,0.00014884958,0.0000317035,0.000024278359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015344463,0.000015881842,0.000017164744,0.0004930751,0.0003025795,0.0008775272,0.000013969473,0.00007959109,9.096911e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019600588,0.000031127358,0.028999703,0.0000068175696,0.000021421674,5.2258837e-8,0.19868264,0.00010524124,0.0003366085,0.76508576,0.003567286,0.0031437357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007286615,0.0000979643,0.03952523,0.000065119486,0.000050147053,0.00003184193,0.83764786,0.000056526587,0.0011958652,0.08531961,0.03519562,0.00008554674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051058898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094821626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6797662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014408755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001777277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5009802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996460968","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2012-0118","title":"An information meta-state approach to documentation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Media, Communication, and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Materiality (auditing); Originality; Context (archaeology); Individuation; Epistemology; Computer science; Negotiation; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Presupposition; Technical documentation; Sociology; Qualitative research; Aesthetics; Psychology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.04192473197938581,"score_gpt":0.37829363841278674,"score_spread":0.33636890643340095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996460968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5719917,0.00011913719,0.37174422,0.0065484256,0.0015846168,0.0008139427,0.0000036606418,0.000064717125,0.04712959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9733764,0.0001781433,0.025054203,0.0007593631,0.00033767262,0.000026199768,0.000050513314,0.000006152797,0.00021137275],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979847,0.0005916219,0.0005686287,0.00007258495,0.0006293998,0.00015305668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983684,0.00010477062,0.00063102634,0.00018221106,0.00050481316,0.0002088022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029674363,0.000084364874,0.00016830224,0.00028550843,0.00031584685,0.00040014277,0.0003107624,0.00004197175,0.00018807425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030092115,0.00007509277,0.00008044162,0.0003349995,0.000039263974,0.0061627147,0.000009571083,0.000102383616,0.00006623117],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017218232,0.00051658053,0.0036776327,0.000060883245,0.00041839384,1.6170631e-7,0.7006831,0.009672927,0.0012191705,0.051541943,0.013474976,0.21856202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046777804,0.0020347184,0.06688212,0.000100171,0.0024806717,0.00002912174,0.27199474,0.0035705399,0.005676597,0.11159703,0.5296186,0.0013379102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006582399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013177114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5161436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001900548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015805625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44678193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007620454","doi":"10.1108/00220410210441","title":"A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Hospitality; Declaration; Knowledge management; Information ethics; Representation (politics); Information system; Cultural diversity; Engineering ethics; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Globalization; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Political science; Law; Tourism; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.04247622556466026,"score_gpt":0.3905917446769292,"score_spread":0.34811551911226896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007620454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6944805,0.0007699034,0.27349657,0.011042939,0.0046350453,0.003183268,0.00003169991,0.00008794309,0.012272132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982275,0.00014890906,0.000792659,0.00010463738,0.00037913275,0.000006804307,0.000013629841,0.0000053767094,0.0003213448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986747,0.000234173,0.0005671424,0.000069453214,0.00033497514,0.00011957556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983003,0.00010736508,0.00058817584,0.00004316727,0.0008895616,0.000071439594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011144014,0.000061396626,0.00012967248,0.00007222724,0.00037751236,0.00028415764,0.000066903616,0.00009266703,0.00009423218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003872616,0.000055068293,0.000035573707,0.00031751723,0.00005419892,0.0011168675,0.000007757725,0.00006864873,0.0000088545185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015208178,0.00013110845,0.013559494,0.00026511317,0.00014015046,0.0000024005724,0.20678805,0.00022123591,0.0012501457,0.70768386,0.026273476,0.043532904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019825252,0.002401871,0.017921194,0.00064091367,0.000621786,0.00043461518,0.582421,0.012963764,0.0035060407,0.031703547,0.32637846,0.0011815658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010114298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037491074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6759803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000237273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006275017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2903558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010476423","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087832","title":"The individual and social dynamics of knowledge sharing: an exploratory study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Social exchange theory; Situational ethics; Preference; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Population; Psychology; Originality; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.048932446630688374,"score_gpt":0.36727879135659247,"score_spread":0.3183463447259041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010476423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956834,0.00004053777,0.000033644807,0.00025899656,0.0004657751,0.00012306102,5.356852e-7,0.0000050205704,0.0033890563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932855,0.00001969294,0.000055109642,0.000006007338,0.00033333496,0.0000020611765,0.0000011631963,0.000004341757,0.0002497456],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.999181,0.00012056499,0.00026178994,0.00006202335,0.0002805189,0.000094105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938536,0.00006414571,0.00029641393,0.000050301314,0.00016543617,0.00003836586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022807478,0.0000464228,0.00008911563,0.00008436841,0.0005274729,0.00021920606,0.00025643938,0.000030156993,0.000027949109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005711729,0.000035816116,0.000029656732,0.0001117859,0.00011362941,0.0007948542,0.00006679278,0.0001557357,0.0000014746462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058218735,0.00046990864,0.26685983,0.00001683713,0.00013684452,0.000002992254,0.5418702,0.000001630174,0.0003441196,0.09306519,0.00034681475,0.09682744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017923359,0.00055304356,0.21753463,0.000016047123,0.00021573227,0.0000014712668,0.75879264,0.00029152242,0.00009974942,0.015097053,0.0054268176,0.0001789423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025916645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010796024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21692246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034148445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005317744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6024435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011175967","doi":"10.1108/00220410810867551","title":"Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Computer science; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Point (geometry); Sociology; Data science; Management science; Social science; Mathematics; Machine learning; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027149219746073965,"score_gpt":0.3443138993624349,"score_spread":0.3171646796163609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011175967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985245,0.00016969335,0.0006169311,0.00046950518,0.0000701065,0.000050536124,1.7781028e-7,6.323007e-7,0.00009793158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993443,0.00011294537,0.0004421791,0.000022797434,0.000039571347,0.0000010908611,3.7889328e-7,0.0000011632239,0.0000356024],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995389,0.000038880993,0.00018142567,0.000051243787,0.00015197809,0.000037573478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958587,0.00001649607,0.00019090589,0.00006332873,0.00012428571,0.000019127187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047650078,0.000026653846,0.00006317435,0.000037384896,0.00009528725,0.000009047263,0.0001107487,0.000016035217,0.0000019913848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001257222,0.000015201232,0.000017266151,0.00007615664,0.0007490335,0.000006687974,0.000051168045,0.000037746115,1.5397508e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019060236,0.0011509248,0.28378853,0.000032506014,0.00025239843,0.00001157477,0.03762718,0.0000520302,0.5979114,0.0010108934,0.0044632754,0.07179323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0066549466,0.0030696166,0.9194737,0.000022971419,0.00006388737,0.0003168926,0.03651694,0.00011495283,0.031620193,0.0011611229,0.00089102174,0.00009372376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005650821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003872307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6356852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005169496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041688974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27598453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011782761","doi":"10.1108/00220410510625840","title":"Usability and user perceptions of a thesaurus‐enhanced search interface","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Thesaurus; Usability; Interface (matter); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; User interface; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016213788283936482,"score_gpt":0.34000562021232583,"score_spread":0.32379183192838934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011782761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76326466,0.000018210983,0.2357307,0.000748675,0.000037210924,0.00006169993,7.136012e-7,0.000003993613,0.0001341195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97335523,0.000045220444,0.026395153,0.000045850564,0.000026500495,8.2479136e-7,3.1105824e-7,0.0000014086083,0.00012950407],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991276,0.000059759095,0.00035457266,0.0000535472,0.00032431658,0.000080194935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999358,0.00004796995,0.00016491875,0.00009071301,0.00028344608,0.000054962948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053481426,0.000043385116,0.000090310714,0.00010877247,0.0000448934,0.00008433278,0.00018170598,0.000020566296,0.0001241179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027540485,0.000033493066,0.000041458792,0.0001491255,0.000041338986,0.0020325207,0.00004844676,0.00010387847,0.000012004847],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021413236,0.0004650916,0.017957777,0.00010066262,0.000061941755,0.0000020985929,0.051136598,0.0037141792,0.26641753,0.008317656,0.00073080487,0.6508815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032929068,0.0016788457,0.47468692,0.00014279551,0.00004529128,0.00015205356,0.0068128705,0.023418684,0.48629808,0.0012669715,0.0018911435,0.00031343198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000074620275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029229477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65056807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058918045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000517622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14735284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015225850","doi":"10.1108/00220411311295315","title":"Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Terminology; Meaning (existential); Knowledge organization; Domain (mathematical analysis); Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0049372449305333365,"score_gpt":0.2683386110452432,"score_spread":0.2634013661147099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015225850","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15689738,0.00059314695,0.8413934,0.000874431,0.00006522681,0.0000769853,1.5215801e-7,0.00002816159,0.00007112004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87828034,0.00019061861,0.12130265,0.00008509101,0.000044718276,6.780864e-7,0.0000010004992,0.000004493737,0.00009040069],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944896,0.00004129045,0.00023953995,0.00008914868,0.00011485913,0.00006619936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992379,0.000054134307,0.00025355394,0.000077277786,0.00032431044,0.000052799707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013012823,0.000060596518,0.00010812352,0.00011754119,0.00005113161,0.0002152506,0.0001240844,0.000024612298,0.000027738219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005227593,0.000051324325,0.000014369821,0.00017326762,0.000034330467,0.0021058517,0.00006204796,0.00006258244,0.0000067421197],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010383669,0.000262754,0.09736857,0.00012561948,0.00025596598,0.000017193985,0.021586828,0.00030945035,0.12369576,0.069153845,0.017798891,0.66941476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043473244,0.0011731246,0.23645137,0.00046595358,0.00028499583,0.0006113698,0.003267264,0.04612682,0.3853924,0.31691766,0.0038224093,0.0011393102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000076059428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001437328,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.721383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038074064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020235908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20929451},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017765150","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2012-0150","title":"Beyond obscenity: an analysis of sexual discourse in LIS educational texts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Sociology; Pejorative; Censorship; Terminology; Value (mathematics); Mainstream; Originality; Media studies; Political science; Social science; Law; Linguistics; Qualitative research; Computer science","score_opus":0.025655809585829286,"score_gpt":0.4103701403948402,"score_spread":0.3847143308090109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017765150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997116,0.00010299944,0.00007917066,0.0012054237,0.00040643036,0.00011875292,0.000008602999,0.0000056522454,0.0009569414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980068,0.000005769622,0.0005029408,0.0000963722,0.000111279034,0.000013755856,0.000051935775,0.000008254263,0.0012028962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998633,0.00016601749,0.00065746595,0.0001426921,0.00025412088,0.00014665462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988441,0.00009681701,0.0005875796,0.00020638184,0.00019691992,0.00006822889],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035021844,0.00009199477,0.00028556038,0.0010151913,0.00002591218,0.00003153086,0.00018818823,0.00010387985,0.0043347464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038479564,0.00008405043,0.000063621505,0.00064365775,0.00008498201,0.00063540705,0.000014927103,0.0001851788,0.00002629326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057722125,0.0015186218,0.9224578,0.000006393654,0.00047210287,0.000007740822,0.007942369,0.000060212427,0.006722779,0.011750536,0.0010113806,0.047992352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074580126,0.00041986737,0.977803,0.000004941042,0.00056963373,0.000021418133,0.014985519,0.000036987294,0.00034805955,0.004926854,0.00005115264,0.000086745706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015908066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006809746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05534523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000872846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059038306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020726632","doi":"10.1108/00220411111145061","title":"The modernity of classification","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Originality; Foundation (evidence); Mainstream; Epistemology; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Data science; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.052757113600748105,"score_gpt":0.3107569152511119,"score_spread":0.2579998016503638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020726632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881613,0.0004313495,0.0101458,0.0001625546,0.00012724352,0.000025627858,6.525702e-7,0.0000011709328,0.00094427867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971086,0.00026553668,0.0024545516,0.000021607178,0.000050134495,7.332283e-7,0.0000017912232,0.000001889389,0.00009517837],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962115,0.000035529938,0.00018496338,0.000031637075,0.0000861424,0.000040590512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995623,0.000011842932,0.00025323953,0.00006282182,0.000092293165,0.000017488666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024532844,0.000026267542,0.000042158917,0.0000138571095,0.000029761708,0.0000053318627,0.00008680483,0.000035363544,0.000008764421],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008740488,0.00001597126,0.00003732963,0.000023497372,0.000063706895,0.000003548029,0.0000099348235,0.000036012872,8.507071e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005068188,0.0001332025,0.015993746,0.000014909473,0.00013318143,0.0000013343808,0.000978772,0.000007779789,0.69741714,0.0009553468,0.0043884353,0.27946934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012000041,0.0017486447,0.2588161,0.000030657047,0.00007063375,0.00005266123,0.0033315131,0.00013424976,0.7071811,0.0064673824,0.020847477,0.000119589975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000047179133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003466596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27934974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004659603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025573665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06512891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027894627","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087814","title":"Documentary tools in everyday life: the wedding planner","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Planner; Originality; Apprenticeship; Everyday life; Documentation; Sociology; Ideology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Qualitative research; Political science; Social science; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.024626413349837253,"score_gpt":0.36958650674202764,"score_spread":0.3449600933921904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027894627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828302,0.00002471775,0.00045080023,0.0052250247,0.0018439715,0.00025176682,0.0000031402149,0.0000068864124,0.009363442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982311,0.000045418044,0.00032076865,0.0005867322,0.0005657085,0.000005771904,0.0000061945498,0.0000037050545,0.00023459218],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986302,0.00016955058,0.0005603594,0.00004210747,0.00045459418,0.00014313636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903977,0.00019694198,0.0005132788,0.00006079127,0.00013149976,0.000057707675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024823288,0.000054599957,0.00009357768,0.00012140687,0.00028803013,0.0003137121,0.00017105642,0.000039244624,0.0010083977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024723157,0.000038300357,0.0000489499,0.00020417162,0.000055544886,0.0031157502,0.000012327085,0.00019939299,0.000022910473],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038438727,0.0001221252,0.09200007,0.000042116113,0.00014786037,0.000014034747,0.387299,0.00055134913,0.008017564,0.3604896,0.051663436,0.099268466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003067214,0.00019929615,0.061335385,0.00008574673,0.00005297708,0.000039140174,0.35327402,0.00007297483,0.0016636268,0.013455257,0.5664622,0.0002921628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006004646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086437585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51479876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000099102894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014768874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035928974","doi":"10.1108/00220411011023607","title":"On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980‐2007)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Originality; Metadata; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Information retrieval; Altmetrics; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.32507304535495857,"score_gpt":0.5600739134317266,"score_spread":0.23500086807676807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035928974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960828,0.00013156542,0.00037954078,0.002195826,0.00072514097,0.00018398049,0.000011240611,0.000001855872,0.00028806817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982828,0.000042772917,0.00010584289,0.000014395658,0.000037581456,0.000004031459,0.0000010346548,0.0000029625776,0.0015085719],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471325,0.00015666486,0.00076892547,0.00027871295,0.0038663251,0.00021612493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935275,0.002968302,0.0007226714,0.00049133756,0.0021170913,0.00017312117],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01668051,0.00008504598,0.00017319832,0.019617788,0.00025327498,0.0037425554,0.0011901059,0.000051930627,0.0010015533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01385032,0.00003988714,0.00012984581,0.03372576,0.0003724681,0.0010731855,0.0001436857,0.0003720052,0.000020871372],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070771406,0.00057401403,0.868578,0.000017320874,0.00002607319,0.0000021189512,0.001038099,0.00016865917,0.058979664,0.013990771,0.024471698,0.03208282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032256002,0.00023352115,0.9698034,0.000015790769,0.0000059883737,0.000009891068,0.0000995026,0.0014301995,0.0025894297,0.024909865,0.00052811066,0.00005177602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022184986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030384153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10122537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066936074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020065196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041328912","doi":"10.1108/00220410510585214","title":"Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visitor pattern; Originality; Computer science; Information seeking; Value (mathematics); Digital library; World Wide Web; Quarter (Canadian coin); Information behavior; Data science; Information retrieval; Library science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.017848961421182235,"score_gpt":0.31234046458478437,"score_spread":0.2944915031636021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041328912","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41967168,0.00017690846,0.5722006,0.0067446427,0.0002709864,0.000088437286,0.0000021935598,0.0000067935553,0.00083778263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780238,0.00008019681,0.021339554,0.00024642897,0.00014087315,3.869771e-7,0.0000012127869,0.0000017600215,0.00016574604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795735,0.0001482893,0.000842385,0.00005280341,0.00087855384,0.00012064879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773407,0.000096520445,0.0010763509,0.000158544,0.00085360743,0.00008092143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023526887,0.000060857783,0.00014298213,0.0004265704,0.00015244483,0.0007441708,0.00064228364,0.000029842786,0.000069142094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016965868,0.000036462523,0.00019723656,0.0009137203,0.000029270437,0.0068586976,0.000044266002,0.00031294572,0.00001563363],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004873716,0.00034685904,0.010048875,0.000016858643,0.0010195867,0.00004381671,0.02409542,0.03967751,0.0075213322,0.00649986,0.0040878598,0.90615463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015663022,0.0034488926,0.6698182,0.00013363938,0.0021610896,0.0019714013,0.0053491727,0.17029732,0.08315227,0.0070270663,0.04015563,0.0008222977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000067581536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006855348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9053323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009144232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009099937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7176056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045935559","doi":"10.1108/00220410310457993","title":"A model of information practices in accounts of everyday‐life information seeking","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":595,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information seeking; Everyday life; Neglect; Focus (optics); Strict constructionism; Psychology; Sociology; Information needs; Information behavior; Cognition; Computer science; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.03956720142467514,"score_gpt":0.32667912051034187,"score_spread":0.28711191908566674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045935559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6292742,0.000011876464,0.36920977,0.00013698926,0.00012616169,0.00013905537,0.0000027223475,0.000004375278,0.0010948831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776791,0.00004218436,0.022122651,0.00013845526,0.000005170315,0.0000018448707,0.0000036442777,0.0000011646338,0.0000057834563],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979936,0.00006745203,0.0011156335,0.000028947597,0.00069565856,0.000098718476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960431,0.00006373741,0.003060939,0.000098554265,0.0006892173,0.00004445205],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013383024,0.00006305794,0.00014721141,0.0005829128,0.000027829235,0.00012308457,0.00023704942,0.000043430606,0.000015078874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006423653,0.000055156564,0.000050935123,0.00046135733,0.000014554889,0.027950294,0.000025028829,0.00012434396,0.0000068892205],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010103275,0.00077857956,0.081395015,0.0015002979,0.00019012066,0.000004386155,0.18152982,0.34839886,0.03530341,0.19702503,0.0015206267,0.15134351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008436141,0.0010688852,0.060630463,0.00046279162,0.000076233984,0.000097583055,0.012255873,0.8232027,0.08123661,0.009946882,0.0020801588,0.0005056714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025602954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000019503786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47480384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089434776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035916007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053071422","doi":"10.1108/00220411211209177","title":"Using classification to convict the Khmer Rouge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Yale University","keywords":"Documentation; Originality; Accountability; Convict; Sociology; Tribunal; Genocide; Human rights; Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Social science; Qualitative research; Criminology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13599331224217137,"score_gpt":0.43451650530702046,"score_spread":0.2985231930648491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053071422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858582,0.0002008838,0.0033945164,0.0032002106,0.001079558,0.00012971711,6.6590405e-7,0.0000054158027,0.0061308276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972465,0.000035312907,0.0009201427,0.0005879445,0.0007870214,0.0000010932848,3.8015483e-7,0.000002939616,0.00041863963],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992568,0.00016353288,0.00016970809,0.000029079114,0.00027150646,0.000109391556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995121,0.000058116115,0.00020336162,0.00004405419,0.00009439922,0.00008797298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012037253,0.00003116773,0.000053120522,0.000030397105,0.00035081367,0.000054419845,0.000084346415,0.000028650178,0.00020390055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007246478,0.00002350554,0.000059592407,0.00013558853,0.00004903379,0.0007986297,0.000004834869,0.00007346118,0.000027677768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008905382,0.00020191135,0.09486555,0.00001209962,0.00010275245,0.0000017862513,0.6838552,0.00025435523,0.03130108,0.121625744,0.049891397,0.017799085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005219336,0.00006961441,0.10727979,0.000030724386,0.00012313545,0.000013001306,0.106141135,0.00004999845,0.0007533149,0.0009941261,0.7838516,0.00017161203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000099664845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000026288659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7339602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003361398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007329016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26982105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054904740","doi":"10.1108/00220410910937624","title":"Revisiting “what is a document?”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Originality; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Instrumentalism; Point (geometry); Foundationalism; Computer science; Order (exchange); Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Social science; Qualitative research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017613425717060656,"score_gpt":0.2888991013678106,"score_spread":0.27128567565074996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054904740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29817408,0.04976004,0.0015046514,0.035492,0.010344008,0.0005566711,0.00001411595,0.00010656978,0.6040479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99068606,0.00068290543,0.0005188035,0.0017802784,0.0026108767,4.3538392e-7,0.0000015883503,0.000004737188,0.0037143182],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993076,0.00001896925,0.00032314405,0.000051952404,0.00021125762,0.000087127584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937475,0.000030658837,0.00029330916,0.000044317756,0.00022011896,0.000036849924],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018350965,0.00006253908,0.00012859241,0.0000699565,0.00015482135,0.0003554451,0.000060770595,0.000010598547,0.0016317978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051537667,0.00004777788,0.000079786514,0.000022961472,0.000021907947,0.0006091148,0.0000052707055,0.00007814371,0.00002328394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008575516,0.00009541215,0.00008059333,0.000042825908,0.00014662785,0.000104061815,0.22550416,0.000012789939,0.00039047486,0.30443537,0.03158817,0.43751377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006829363,0.00046969173,0.00026714374,0.00024019518,0.00011315119,0.00001694846,0.022658523,0.000012341322,0.0002755616,0.023175407,0.95191944,0.00016867991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012679323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002418127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92033124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006268461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010740086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99928087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059516109","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2014-0056","title":"Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Information retrieval","score_opus":0.04345031035981671,"score_gpt":0.34930483806059903,"score_spread":0.3058545277007823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059516109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97223544,0.000030505136,0.026484465,0.0009313315,0.000105681596,0.00012418776,0.0000015830416,0.0000030202557,0.00008377367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982427,0.000046686135,0.001471455,0.00021407587,0.000019034915,6.5660566e-7,0.0000023605623,7.9522505e-7,0.0000022586296],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987767,0.00017563514,0.00047716987,0.000036333084,0.00045498766,0.00007919782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998774,0.00027273354,0.00037210088,0.000069353904,0.00048778366,0.000024038256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014273487,0.00005133774,0.00012923159,0.00017319179,0.00006241751,0.00013064774,0.00021343614,0.00001802062,0.000002575471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021590546,0.000031798423,0.000031416777,0.0002483873,0.000062909065,0.003224635,0.000052235155,0.0001618335,0.0000022972429],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009950418,0.00027562122,0.015847126,0.00028198824,0.00015029343,0.000009071244,0.62329906,0.00062461896,0.007028828,0.10856259,0.0006075019,0.24231829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010071949,0.0037792774,0.57842034,0.00058249565,0.00007790125,0.0003260365,0.2610133,0.08098947,0.04879327,0.014004377,0.0014704235,0.00047116817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023807934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006398002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5625732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006676501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028493918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23377825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064566779","doi":"10.1108/00220410610653299","title":"Building “civilisational competence”: a new role for libraries?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Politics; Competence (human resources); Realm; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Management; Economics; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.02097025533264822,"score_gpt":0.32344563269040283,"score_spread":0.3024753773577546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064566779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8720743,0.00029171281,0.09054029,0.016529402,0.0010432731,0.00041240215,0.000007134515,0.000035578152,0.019065896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237379,0.0000093063245,0.073469795,0.000207419,0.0014544985,0.0000017207728,0.00000887325,0.0000032539003,0.0011072649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991554,0.00004314109,0.00026904437,0.00006170078,0.00035695994,0.00011377317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939543,0.000121021854,0.00030534214,0.0000274592,0.00008243503,0.000068288246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039170505,0.000041808788,0.00006932619,0.00007673588,0.0002484979,0.00035146571,0.00013618615,0.000028222179,0.00018487964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000712789,0.000038289993,0.00005989529,0.00017022919,0.00005624724,0.0043821777,0.000005165262,0.000040621766,0.0000031631644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005626395,0.000038727554,0.010032839,0.0000034307652,0.0000073109854,0.0000010798886,0.002075812,0.00031834166,0.006759209,0.96638006,0.009760139,0.004566784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097021915,0.00032693037,0.015171786,0.00003065065,0.00002468638,0.0000068227296,0.0058074477,0.00024177329,0.013392004,0.828654,0.13523571,0.00013798878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021464164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008867914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13772608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043972526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063550245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3389192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066141084","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087841","title":"Managing documents at home for serious leisure: a case study of the hobby of gourmet cooking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hobby; Computer science; Ethnography; Originality; Conceptual framework; Data collection; Sociology; World Wide Web; Qualitative research; Social science; Visual arts; Art","score_opus":0.11402629694355222,"score_gpt":0.4451857493267632,"score_spread":0.331159452383211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066141084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978791,0.000013345084,0.00052326306,0.00027565067,0.00068655086,0.0004974852,0.0000063362654,0.000002832533,0.00011542365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99885106,0.000004692252,0.000482275,0.00004034704,0.00004552129,0.00000694841,9.2513443e-7,0.0000058439796,0.00056238956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973519,0.000089768,0.0011381547,0.00009986611,0.0012065539,0.000113774535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969269,0.00024146446,0.002030479,0.00023242738,0.00052215613,0.000046561076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002328464,0.000092665985,0.0002555524,0.00033523017,0.00017078486,0.0001505931,0.0004512601,0.000030022475,0.00016346155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014806842,0.000058424845,0.00016567834,0.00040427546,0.000039382907,0.0013932462,0.0001125257,0.00012342732,0.000003680962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066987326,0.0008480898,0.8452986,0.000077755576,0.0003119253,0.00013202125,0.030576752,0.0018872482,0.028486364,0.0005474447,0.0074711316,0.08369281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025627984,0.0038693093,0.6760027,0.00021622844,0.0015269332,0.002707725,0.23429532,0.004045877,0.025718639,0.013456777,0.011731371,0.0008011725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007317293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026930086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20371857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047176472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003009184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2382496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069777712","doi":"10.1108/00220410910998924","title":"Emotional labour in librarians' instructional work","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Emotional labor; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Information literacy; Invisibility; Pedagogy; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.016385396074864216,"score_gpt":0.34724045438124235,"score_spread":0.3308550583063781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069777712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640909,0.00010787079,0.00035125655,0.023286317,0.001236199,0.00009575899,0.0000038503254,0.000013344113,0.010814548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895296,0.00007693953,0.007933564,0.000589528,0.0007261431,8.558748e-7,0.000005115688,0.0000035022022,0.001134724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858105,0.00021965151,0.00038694215,0.00006940295,0.00060863286,0.00013433852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993042,0.0001030846,0.00028329928,0.00003932953,0.00018951208,0.000080611244],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057060336,0.00005474055,0.00010037449,0.00023012022,0.00017559002,0.00007554336,0.00014819558,0.00006689187,0.0010895549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001950681,0.00005257785,0.000053291347,0.0005897574,0.000050253617,0.0015544913,0.0000069858734,0.00021409753,0.000018311204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007307653,0.0001752835,0.06501154,0.000002451091,0.000013769557,0.000014575125,0.0037099435,0.00040065605,0.0001873765,0.8990119,0.003276228,0.028123174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000598455,0.000053508695,0.76004076,0.000083175706,0.0000059007734,0.000009229218,0.0016935474,0.000001984963,0.00003501112,0.22717535,0.010241149,0.0000619174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026870342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000031599553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6950292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020740759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003390889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071322747","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2014-0037","title":"Differences over discourse structure differences: a reply to Urquhart and Urquhart","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Rhetorical question; Discipline; Epistemology; Strengths and weaknesses; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Computer science; Data science; Linguistics; Social science; Philosophy; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.03010225202968256,"score_gpt":0.31396739110756106,"score_spread":0.28386513907787847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071322747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85198736,0.000101582,0.14440267,0.0028695716,0.00046766747,0.00008482702,0.0000015001453,0.000011987331,0.000072829636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708327,0.00001339538,0.028081464,0.0007490095,0.00019065484,0.0000015680404,5.1132724e-7,0.0000041843045,0.00012647908],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874985,0.00006709975,0.00035748852,0.00018149265,0.00050204754,0.00014199689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913335,0.000044338034,0.00027586086,0.00018442697,0.00013718242,0.00022484864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002591542,0.00010754755,0.00018433105,0.00013682776,0.000049362097,0.00034691,0.00034980036,0.000029687031,0.0000279108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000763745,0.000077671284,0.000034785568,0.00014224833,0.000021414018,0.0013885447,0.00009489076,0.00012446087,0.000003490271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000311327,0.00028755053,0.6732908,0.00009640552,0.00030385936,0.00015758991,0.073200546,0.0014636561,0.013222005,0.03783631,0.022304524,0.17752546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007367199,0.003425049,0.77456754,0.0006461559,0.00019932524,0.00084896636,0.007860314,0.050124384,0.0053551043,0.14335984,0.0048886915,0.0013574172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046149948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017063725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17616805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058574427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007610622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33452612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077911880","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2013-0110","title":"An interdisciplinary platform for information behavior research in the liberal arts hobby","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hobby; Sociology; The arts; Originality; Context (archaeology); Social science; Scholarship; Public relations; Leisure studies; Sociology of leisure; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Qualitative research; Engineering","score_opus":0.08543100293549707,"score_gpt":0.4921809328197194,"score_spread":0.4067499298842223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077911880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796527,0.000014124754,0.011063614,0.0013352056,0.00056876277,0.00079229544,0.0000018267338,0.0000076180418,0.0065638544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983969,0.0000055286937,0.00086860964,0.000068929636,0.00029765762,0.00016979566,0.000049403992,0.0000086529,0.00013456582],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843764,0.00024340686,0.00057766814,0.00008542417,0.0004672451,0.00018859375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989391,0.00022582935,0.0003753355,0.00019694974,0.00022109541,0.000041698746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033924275,0.00007915865,0.000121984755,0.00048234177,0.00013896817,0.00022643105,0.00029038207,0.000056536268,0.00009228575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021625923,0.00005737663,0.00005966145,0.00021486777,0.000033699518,0.0025050587,0.000028657749,0.00021362303,0.000036850462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015264193,0.001176858,0.15518446,0.00009997429,0.0000980491,0.000016764003,0.092222266,0.0007916981,0.00025734404,0.067765966,0.03366308,0.6471971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033100483,0.0023346238,0.93028045,0.00007907634,0.00006688846,0.000067252724,0.026392762,0.00054995774,0.00013998075,0.025739586,0.010895605,0.00014375005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036986712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043112374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.775096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012642123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002025873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23397511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082584912","doi":"10.1108/00220411211209195","title":"Social discovery tools: extending the principle of user convenience","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Metadata; Warrant; Computer science; Bridge (graph theory); Internet privacy; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.028570975055179703,"score_gpt":0.31685417411362204,"score_spread":0.28828319905844235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082584912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96083903,0.00016384122,0.037299022,0.0009886194,0.00037694842,0.00004513703,4.859955e-7,0.0000045987094,0.00028231976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958321,0.000021512436,0.0035833663,0.00019929699,0.00025272035,7.617141e-7,4.0458727e-7,0.0000022170855,0.00010764376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992601,0.00006727116,0.0002572051,0.00004274022,0.0002680389,0.00010459468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934065,0.00007910756,0.00043228993,0.000079513564,0.000040375533,0.00002806334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035650525,0.000044255263,0.00008136512,0.000044438322,0.0000763895,0.00017378168,0.0003844837,0.0000151161985,0.000019601533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000121039775,0.000027704957,0.00005775489,0.00014843848,0.000021671513,0.010708347,0.00007068789,0.0000669264,0.0000035442536],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052181727,0.00018776862,0.09590944,0.000055235287,0.00008208278,0.0000044332382,0.015027212,0.0001779462,0.01634196,0.8526286,0.0007052457,0.018827897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007217782,0.00017672626,0.93880653,0.000057488563,0.000034524983,0.000067627305,0.0011079159,0.0005448159,0.028721219,0.00396126,0.025653422,0.0001466924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000033182341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.2568084e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8486673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000183372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003572474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77632934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087441382","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2013-0120","title":"The library assemblage: creative institutions in an information society","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Huntington University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Institution; Assemblage (archaeology); Construct (python library); Sociology; Transformative learning; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Foundation (evidence); Work (physics); Economic Justice; Computer science; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Business; Engineering; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.06184731343324912,"score_gpt":0.38771368165334574,"score_spread":0.3258663682200966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087441382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534422,0.000045704768,0.00085926236,0.011754566,0.00043477293,0.00015245925,0.0000015069986,0.000014368687,0.033295155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794924,0.00013400093,0.0010517637,0.0003891577,0.00017339105,0.0000021219403,0.00000917865,0.0000012416007,0.00028991618],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990946,0.00015096247,0.00026855007,0.000030918316,0.00036600692,0.000088943896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945706,0.000049225306,0.0002576569,0.000039626928,0.000101342164,0.000095110874],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089505105,0.00003367252,0.00004553528,0.000050508872,0.00030735953,0.0006072248,0.0001618281,0.000031006814,0.000028305867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011764484,0.00002344612,0.00003287093,0.00033250096,0.00010884885,0.029062646,0.000009001095,0.0000863385,0.000009108138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021491005,0.00024108218,0.11838832,0.000008171854,0.00003115767,0.0000082782435,0.40320164,0.002256215,0.00032321733,0.35716328,0.056910418,0.061253317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016648762,0.0007397368,0.094873495,0.000050817296,0.000020767959,0.000008640067,0.5064068,0.0006439051,0.0011930506,0.04691693,0.34728163,0.00019935009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009238242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016716588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31024635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007876722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011355301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98451734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088638006","doi":"10.1108/00220411311300057","title":"Interpreting reference work with contemporary practice theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Typology; Sociology; Knowledge management; Face (sociological concept); Structuring; Interpersonal communication; Computer science; Service (business); Public relations; Social science; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.030506919127723655,"score_gpt":0.3466890264161326,"score_spread":0.31618210728840895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088638006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7581369,0.00014562135,0.003497808,0.020233229,0.00028404515,0.00025717818,3.1347514e-7,0.000019752733,0.21742514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945354,0.000026404878,0.0035773243,0.00083794934,0.00011492342,0.0000022275417,0.0000010032755,0.0000025221461,0.0009022436],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898654,0.00029862078,0.0002192222,0.000056936326,0.00035330225,0.000085351596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989108,0.00030380368,0.0004692116,0.00004037234,0.00020470489,0.000071111404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010585594,0.000040655985,0.00006157742,0.000048616137,0.00015113667,0.00034416877,0.00013087537,0.000024261923,0.00046528986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000305439,0.000028642773,0.000018279452,0.0001990135,0.00008921347,0.008727856,0.0000068449103,0.00010261241,0.0000375767],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019342682,0.0005282255,0.17007086,0.00003295494,0.0002348155,0.00011743057,0.2375177,0.00012641413,0.004913075,0.33154827,0.060610753,0.19236521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002162353,0.0027521239,0.054739956,0.0008696199,0.00010165216,0.00009302367,0.663737,0.000027848837,0.0035627994,0.083715245,0.18761265,0.00062573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013531104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007757567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4262193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003487629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029857922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6327485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089259215","doi":"10.1108/00220411011066763","title":"Classification in a social world: bias and trust","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Computer science; Pluralism (philosophy); Transparency (behavior); Value (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Trustworthiness; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Sociology; Data science; Political science; Law; Social science; Internet privacy; Computer security","score_opus":0.03093916958424952,"score_gpt":0.3438346007629026,"score_spread":0.3128954311786531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089259215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984432,0.000072449,0.00016055796,0.0008483604,0.000114069626,0.000022042974,5.4931314e-7,0.0000012520621,0.00033753845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759334,0.00004154346,0.0018984843,0.00007400858,0.00024281553,0.0000011486566,0.0000048308243,0.0000025769928,0.00014123162],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963903,0.000025986392,0.00016148017,0.000052300584,0.000070041315,0.000051167495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997736,0.000010034962,0.00013384984,0.000028424149,0.000031546486,0.000022541022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024167106,0.00003408885,0.000056385335,0.0000756205,0.000024820987,0.000019528035,0.000040236955,0.00005613125,0.000014009925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008506703,0.000028142767,0.00002084099,0.00006279983,0.00004795353,0.0000056731806,0.00000941458,0.00009931571,7.3018657e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087964916,0.000055314955,0.092908144,0.0000070511696,0.000014327787,0.0000026260655,0.00026128508,5.3670664e-7,0.8066816,0.00032559392,0.0019863998,0.09766918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018245858,0.00027484243,0.91916716,0.000013408663,0.000017701626,0.000054504206,0.0008633398,0.000038706778,0.033930358,0.001197939,0.04251462,0.00010282716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000031997872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006042497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.826259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000053180543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023300669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11476287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105523876","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087850","title":"A multilevel model of HIV/AIDS information/help network development","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Social network (sociolinguistics); Social support; Coping (psychology); Originality; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Computer science; Business; Social psychology; Qualitative research; World Wide Web; Psychiatry; Social science","score_opus":0.01782160198863562,"score_gpt":0.3004902507299031,"score_spread":0.28266864874126746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105523876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773759,0.00003223336,0.015471329,0.00029864244,0.0006808802,0.00013389376,0.0000017824748,0.0000098292,0.00599551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96759444,0.000043246495,0.031462166,0.00008176448,0.00046449693,0.0000027282454,0.0000038644735,0.000003292393,0.00034399275],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882716,0.00004219414,0.0004849028,0.000034629353,0.00046894402,0.00014218084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989215,0.000057410365,0.00056612067,0.00003844504,0.00033458543,0.0000819104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008540629,0.00005700014,0.00012332344,0.000067667286,0.00020391609,0.000059944665,0.00014072172,0.00007739505,0.0001599558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000840226,0.00005122267,0.000064979824,0.00014260708,0.000068651236,0.0013815011,0.000016506612,0.00017338194,0.000013865862],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028950148,0.00021558355,0.015796233,0.000045675177,0.00018849772,0.0000019399633,0.45692524,0.039218333,0.0029811955,0.11792093,0.022564977,0.3438519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016971486,0.0013317167,0.103684105,0.00085323077,0.00063073426,0.000053216776,0.2962884,0.055617873,0.016198091,0.3032679,0.20240864,0.002694602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003184154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008028122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3411573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059695063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031724977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20887998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112341358","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2013-0133","title":"Beyond traditional publishing models","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Timeline; Originality; Audience measurement; Publicity; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Product (mathematics); Electronic publishing; Process (computing); Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Social science; History; Political science; Qualitative research; Law","score_opus":0.1789991944869216,"score_gpt":0.28273827787485295,"score_spread":0.10373908338793136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112341358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39308035,0.0008925746,0.002694917,0.019840365,0.0025619878,0.000112519956,0.000021949012,0.000045765104,0.5807496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964548,0.000015127755,0.0012706928,0.00043116816,0.00095706736,0.000001638134,0.000042688214,0.0000065793965,0.0008202349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989694,0.000097575976,0.0003363928,0.000046734578,0.000473179,0.00007671425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987118,0.000062897765,0.00036256234,0.00008906713,0.00067728985,0.00009635314],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001197598,0.000053596275,0.0000888683,0.00016677634,0.0001284815,0.003720309,0.0002637037,0.000025968278,0.00022798273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001810753,0.00004555036,0.000055285764,0.000037288064,0.000036865193,0.025515174,0.000016794258,0.00025626307,0.000010191736],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034883575,0.000079271296,0.00008788867,0.0000032742823,0.000033042837,0.0000024637673,0.035860587,0.0007602285,0.00003716883,0.840519,0.118062764,0.004519392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012761145,0.00021275994,0.00024265487,0.00003362012,0.000037524325,0.00004353842,0.014146222,0.0012308527,0.000049290913,0.9215463,0.06106907,0.00011207996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006401425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038672573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6033744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011563961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133732808","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2014-0129","title":"The role of emotions in online information seeking and sharing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Amusement; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Contempt; Worry; Information seeking; Content analysis; Information sharing; Computer science; Anxiety; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.01712079679858132,"score_gpt":0.29226983402361506,"score_spread":0.27514903722503375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133732808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9576165,0.00047058286,0.030930012,0.001898495,0.00006893525,0.0000706439,8.224956e-7,0.0000075334297,0.008936484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99633825,0.000038380036,0.0035599875,0.00004378384,0.000004920155,2.7761808e-7,0.000001295126,6.379231e-7,0.000012470191],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960023,0.000020597052,0.00020780195,0.00001689502,0.00012200023,0.00003248513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995503,0.000032547552,0.00022387804,0.00008264519,0.00008832151,0.00002231548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035650906,0.000020148625,0.000036788202,0.00007746764,0.000022264034,0.00014348222,0.00020099751,0.000007556489,5.5892747e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005732093,0.000014460871,0.0000107839305,0.00011516758,0.000009170883,0.0023088504,0.000061383624,0.000048690592,7.059623e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034752873,0.000117050426,0.021304302,0.000013540557,0.000023406637,0.0000015078541,0.02620588,0.0018724452,0.001465404,0.21337645,0.00011562001,0.73546964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059923455,0.00088479195,0.35750163,0.00046622,0.000026488304,0.0002843797,0.08225079,0.2830954,0.0034849402,0.19597456,0.069655955,0.00038250696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001551716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024294297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73508716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024026343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022460283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16738608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140842165","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000007098","title":"Mapping national research profiles in social science disciplines","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Data science; Field (mathematics); Baseline (sea); Citation impact; Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Regional science; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Benchmark (surveying); Statistics; Geography; Information retrieval; Econometrics; Data mining; Library science; Political science; Cartography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7583291958422465,"score_gpt":0.6992803763177389,"score_spread":0.05904881952450758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140842165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9779146,0.00011145362,0.0011112619,0.003420162,0.00030457455,0.00012234975,0.0000018871406,0.0000023075102,0.017011419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997849,0.00008754471,0.0009836679,0.00003440173,0.00037217073,0.0000031925777,4.7580406e-7,0.0000032512821,0.00066631805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739368,0.0002874021,0.00089704065,0.00025142485,0.024227174,0.00040016897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827369,0.0017113057,0.0004232573,0.000099278404,0.014881883,0.00014737977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.095453754,0.000059072598,0.00015858686,0.086923465,0.0005117872,0.0024566925,0.001443035,0.00004004246,0.00030179988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0341233,0.00004061968,0.000068209876,0.1821378,0.0003445516,0.003148187,0.0002866577,0.00033855796,0.000065563894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015074568,0.00044671234,0.6891846,0.000007636105,0.00001197335,0.0000708915,0.004195155,0.00026368635,0.04312862,0.0123565355,0.027862301,0.22232112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007863914,0.00014331144,0.8687799,0.00002007455,7.79527e-7,0.00004578278,0.007280326,0.0015907903,0.0015904254,0.11166864,0.008007415,0.000086168795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014941192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000061255205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22223495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007444668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009273901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342073150","doi":"10.1108/jdoc-09-2015-0111","title":"On the composition of scientific abstracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Computer science; Rhetorical question; Argumentation theory; Relation (database); Information retrieval; Originality; Similarity (geometry); Scientific writing; Composition (language); Value (mathematics); Linguistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.013616701985817723,"score_gpt":0.3029858504638016,"score_spread":0.2893691484779839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342073150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50954115,0.000010677035,0.48789257,0.0021200855,0.00010546458,0.000030928106,3.3360942e-7,0.000009184007,0.0002895847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825998,0.000007293326,0.017235503,0.0000632464,0.000018168437,7.946938e-7,2.0868552e-7,0.0000018270158,0.00007318478],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991562,0.000049188413,0.00031197432,0.00006694288,0.00035846146,0.000057229612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987911,0.00019409903,0.0006179136,0.0001694714,0.00020620697,0.000021195954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005761395,0.000040443138,0.0000742152,0.00015263342,0.00005766597,0.00008001317,0.00033087324,0.000012789231,0.000024354653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004697774,0.000019813322,0.00006132214,0.00020006008,0.000048169288,0.001047699,0.000021805388,0.000042986154,0.000010434332],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020091276,0.00008894367,0.00020266602,0.0000033050735,0.000028761287,0.000003879211,0.00023848261,0.00019693197,0.817978,0.10289313,0.0017698376,0.07657597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028048,0.00021135242,0.0054366062,0.000115972594,0.000013429359,0.000015597725,0.000018295867,0.00013136215,0.88677335,0.10664474,0.00030773735,0.00005108739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001087841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.1212634e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4730586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054481796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023139432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08079638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462473632","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2015-0110","title":"Illusions of a “Bond”: tagging cultural products across online platforms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); World Wide Web; Computer science; Subject (documents); Theme (computing); Reading (process); Focus (optics); Product (mathematics); Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.026899734514892342,"score_gpt":0.3382282509249075,"score_spread":0.31132851641001513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462473632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786948,0.00012787878,0.015303002,0.0045483615,0.0001284867,0.00006567999,0.0000057151597,0.000016320162,0.0011097478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98232746,0.00006206148,0.017030543,0.00017363417,0.000031197058,5.435728e-7,0.0000023953605,0.0000028329957,0.00036935747],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999229,0.000013761017,0.00034892387,0.00006510679,0.0002486728,0.000094509494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899095,0.000048653787,0.00045549186,0.00021059273,0.00025099207,0.00004328826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024274705,0.00005377625,0.00009948284,0.000059967115,0.000049936436,0.00008076027,0.00045337237,0.00001612123,0.000014356018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118222575,0.000029249331,0.000050180493,0.00018991751,0.000032976157,0.0026381817,0.00012274244,0.00005625144,0.0000060879674],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093458504,0.0006336001,0.0015760183,0.000054020806,0.00010833468,0.000025005815,0.02321297,0.000064712,0.3500608,0.08470251,0.003150311,0.5363183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017457841,0.0033002961,0.12055228,0.0028162864,0.00010667959,0.001702042,0.02979928,0.0015873767,0.65422726,0.036067054,0.13080296,0.0015806551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005138823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000066148095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53473765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042716114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003922633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1912618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508121523","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2015-0080","title":"Pictorial metaphors for information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Originality; Computer science; The arts; Set (abstract data type); Beauty; Information science; Identity (music); Psychology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Linguistics; Qualitative research; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.015678800603762734,"score_gpt":0.32468659318804566,"score_spread":0.3090077925842829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508121523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74904436,0.00020304267,0.22468957,0.0013286666,0.010877886,0.0005115615,0.000038322036,0.000029085624,0.01327753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971523,0.00002248815,0.0011360835,0.00021040032,0.00094812637,0.00001782149,0.000011645913,0.0000059633894,0.0004951411],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999197,0.000058312995,0.0004091265,0.000045470915,0.0001896322,0.00010043065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901927,0.00011011577,0.00047586559,0.00006205478,0.0002909533,0.000041770723],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042617298,0.00006013013,0.00010807625,0.0001603199,0.000035523983,0.000039978215,0.00006793751,0.000048964328,0.0010413879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011984872,0.000036852864,0.000108286185,0.00006985793,0.000012669021,0.0013258726,0.000003893491,0.000039148912,0.00011241411],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022021788,0.00014868363,0.0011235871,0.000026730537,0.00045408515,0.000005494899,0.010467704,0.0000020238015,0.019472387,0.04454247,0.03392956,0.8876251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.06059838,0.006836338,0.093193576,0.0003255648,0.0019377129,0.00045612478,0.026558194,0.000012419573,0.096170485,0.16359507,0.54921114,0.0011050061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010612803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002348633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8865201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053262906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022657994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520081532","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2016-0035","title":"Information seeking and use in the context of minimalist lifestyles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Originality; Curiosity; Thematic analysis; Poverty; Psychological resilience; Psychology; Creativity; Sociology; Public relations; Qualitative research; Social science; Social psychology; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.025500425448497753,"score_gpt":0.3184799363790255,"score_spread":0.29297951093052776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520081532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99365157,0.000012734836,0.00018129474,0.005615651,0.00005928576,0.000052719377,0.0000011531101,0.0000010521428,0.00042455376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937433,0.00010226523,0.00015842721,0.0002813006,0.000044338823,4.3907485e-7,4.9435016e-7,4.910801e-7,0.00003791228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993768,0.000100084355,0.00022950888,0.000016781847,0.00023114226,0.00004569153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942434,0.00019256036,0.00028876378,0.000021621976,0.000054594704,0.000018143166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007320317,0.000020996042,0.000042336105,0.00006391939,0.000057512058,0.00012896411,0.00006917621,0.000015203932,0.00001772397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020311595,0.00001127692,0.000014341264,0.00009856872,0.00007974835,0.00765456,0.0000035301082,0.000021836877,0.000001085625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008706202,0.00004286968,0.67508215,0.00001228268,0.000008500476,0.0000027562953,0.17791277,0.000002198939,0.0065193796,0.056242056,0.0013647329,0.082723275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012442381,0.0003698292,0.7759211,0.00018706523,0.000016233205,0.000014724391,0.18981212,0.0000136483695,0.0030362925,0.004221411,0.025071047,0.0000922657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019746501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029577583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10083901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015705238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007386943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5549371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520992866","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2015-0144","title":"The role of agency in historians’ experiences of serendipity in physical and digital information environments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Originality; Grounded theory; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Qualitative research; Social science; History","score_opus":0.006658093759537086,"score_gpt":0.1958820623895149,"score_spread":0.1892239686299778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520992866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9875271,0.000019329666,0.000020681577,0.00006226929,0.00006526708,0.00003863004,0.000005686821,4.1563698e-7,0.012260665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99981153,0.000039639865,0.000006660888,0.0000035959702,0.000029829851,0.0000025065315,0.000001611009,8.381148e-7,0.000103804734],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995535,0.000009582684,0.0002384527,0.000020924503,0.0001413022,0.00003626377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970627,0.00004280426,0.00021211802,0.000020000249,0.000008618079,0.000010213113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00005426412,0.00002948912,0.000057669753,0.00006018491,0.000018261011,0.000034974684,0.00004360862,0.000002544674,0.000015486128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075766407,0.000015998461,0.000020758036,0.000011530319,0.00009045091,0.0018963497,0.000011035789,0.00001748253,0.0000012613485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015965608,0.00027769417,0.004352067,0.000022270884,0.0000305795,0.0000010598498,0.28527015,0.000015644624,0.0005871447,0.25083616,0.00005064911,0.4583969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026407586,0.0011151868,0.3327845,0.0002809882,0.000024123496,0.0000039137894,0.11186236,0.00009027711,0.0030096201,0.49416795,0.053829774,0.00019055535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009153669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006782153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45820636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022870383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005406179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13748078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542508357","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2016-0073","title":"What everybody knows: embodied information in serious leisure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Sport Psychology and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Phenomenology (philosophy); Hobby; Sign (mathematics); Sociology; Reading (process); Amateur; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Visual arts; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019565143353999042,"score_gpt":0.37805689168247003,"score_spread":0.35849174832847097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542508357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97921735,0.00026950307,0.000088404355,0.0010659053,0.004519248,0.00011696464,9.399691e-7,0.000005880847,0.014715814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984252,0.00035690094,0.00011583455,0.0003038229,0.00018917382,0.000005860843,0.000008130119,0.0000049067503,0.00059020193],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990959,0.00004398568,0.0005016775,0.00006574563,0.00015522054,0.00013745169],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864686,0.00002044123,0.0009689132,0.00022577903,0.00009793957,0.00004007342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056801195,0.000081117236,0.0001615805,0.00019717486,0.00012112117,0.0002263121,0.00022889623,0.00010624088,0.0008830367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024774123,0.000073168616,0.000052611893,0.000047898073,0.000041037576,0.007114331,0.00001323657,0.00023437921,0.00029489168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015857026,0.00022691688,0.7581441,0.000032765656,0.00014677651,0.00010171148,0.018204167,0.00020374855,0.00022905548,0.002815652,0.013358283,0.20495112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025863077,0.00022291207,0.97396404,0.00008453098,0.000018532155,0.00015462693,0.0026418415,0.000017943177,0.0001271056,0.0008593183,0.019232288,0.00009057583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004462442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004329693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21581993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049352624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028479019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9668633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599420210","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2016-0068","title":"The way of WalDorF: fostering creativity in LIS programs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Meaning (existential); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08959758315255699,"score_gpt":0.4446249988348613,"score_spread":0.3550274156823043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599420210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990811,0.000044117918,0.000117567106,0.0016753359,0.00086823263,0.00010118209,4.957696e-7,0.0000019638394,0.006380109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989827,0.000050254683,0.000116542324,0.000025241612,0.000057373596,0.0000054199877,2.5284137e-7,0.0000032359385,0.0007589811],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992821,0.00010134564,0.00028727102,0.00006444697,0.0001707596,0.00009405496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884343,0.00014364297,0.0007177803,0.00019592616,0.00006951782,0.000029724422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006871721,0.000045025536,0.000094909214,0.00005885172,0.00015791297,0.00014067929,0.00024895725,0.000020547795,0.00007743725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021264811,0.000031081676,0.000043320266,0.00005972496,0.00011624854,0.00046562927,0.000033163156,0.000100880236,0.0000049106493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023029643,0.00054092135,0.39873195,0.000012817344,0.000024355952,0.000012454944,0.013315994,0.000008639664,0.016521495,0.0025406012,0.00060809124,0.5674524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071187277,0.00030237884,0.986619,0.000055412605,0.00001115296,0.00003900002,0.0031356611,0.00001564951,0.0059471186,0.001171058,0.0019439494,0.00004778009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012837713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000102309925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58788705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035439134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025456478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13565737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759724852","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2016-0045","title":"Information activities as serious leisure within the fanfiction community","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Originality; Library science; Information science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Qualitative research; Computer science; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.01972860829692162,"score_gpt":0.34301809856350174,"score_spread":0.3232894902665801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759724852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8957551,0.000011564233,0.00008943626,0.0022056352,0.0007623624,0.000088133864,0.0000010666004,0.0000063678904,0.1010803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778235,0.000074283875,0.000046093155,0.00012723256,0.00017059488,0.0000015401491,0.0000019693048,0.0000018651712,0.0017940847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992665,0.00013657809,0.00018675099,0.0000132424275,0.0003315402,0.00006538315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989256,0.00006026702,0.00075653126,0.00010141157,0.00011568921,0.000040502182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010872708,0.000037557864,0.00006461576,0.00003432985,0.0008127394,0.0009067146,0.000230394,0.000030542353,0.000029006467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034100786,0.000025822443,0.000042907857,0.000028947345,0.00012751819,0.005618435,0.000018843248,0.0001840661,0.000012683418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016295991,0.00008228896,0.01061051,0.000021256426,0.000077758945,0.0000022585082,0.3807396,0.00017135723,0.0004068385,0.028389351,0.0030017362,0.5763341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001144449,0.000475154,0.1489433,0.00010822284,0.00007254291,0.000043462584,0.5018789,0.000020245332,0.0016099067,0.011687259,0.33385983,0.00015668401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010117259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096067804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5761774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007730887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011978906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.874347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760487352","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2016-0089","title":"Health information practices of young parents","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Child and Family Research Institute; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Information literacy; Seekers; Originality; Context (archaeology); Information seeking; Health literacy; Focus group; Information sharing; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Health care; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.08270499803879422,"score_gpt":0.5511381592614655,"score_spread":0.46843316122267126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760487352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97900605,0.000061063656,0.005104156,0.0045262915,0.0017451622,0.00048397447,0.000017027429,0.000008606399,0.009047668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954025,0.000183877,0.0029506953,0.0012010161,0.00014857626,0.0000060079014,0.000020894915,0.0000028475454,0.00008358623],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99657774,0.00032618063,0.0024848722,0.00003902177,0.00040703316,0.00016514877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976521,0.0001368321,0.02216946,0.00022548327,0.0008359943,0.00011121176],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038737932,0.00006287059,0.00023033879,0.00014511403,0.00083384314,0.00007942158,0.00024125547,0.00005993352,0.0002394293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00195404,0.00004889146,0.00004928571,0.000053554162,0.000028417002,0.016486553,0.000040015962,0.00032913647,0.0000571312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027503422,0.00005702048,0.88840365,0.0010079828,0.000024630459,2.292566e-7,0.02060201,0.000012468684,0.00002914514,0.0008383939,0.0061234385,0.08262599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001967607,0.00024281666,0.9604484,0.0005006622,0.000014205688,0.00000784944,0.009220697,0.00024293533,0.00011551749,0.00072401605,0.026452608,0.000062681174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075214874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005440324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08256331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019377923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006227777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99726933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765390333","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2016-0112","title":"Identifying “best bets” for searching in chemical engineering","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Database; Computer science; Information retrieval; Originality; Bibliographic database; Search engine indexing; Subject (documents); Web of science; World Wide Web; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.638216984837964,"score_gpt":0.6510249154957314,"score_spread":0.012807930657767419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765390333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96314216,0.00012342834,0.03533495,0.0006073329,0.0004565607,0.000105266336,0.0000020425748,0.0000014236882,0.00022682037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987485,0.000042878502,0.01216164,0.0000116910105,0.00014936687,0.000002417001,4.672653e-7,0.0000048365514,0.00014168947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600947,0.000034580054,0.00062080123,0.00014620698,0.0029658554,0.00022310347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967925,0.001342272,0.0005696321,0.00021329708,0.0009486365,0.00013364822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013699053,0.000054349366,0.00016648273,0.014827573,0.00015399969,0.003971986,0.0012010415,0.000036749803,0.000051938947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026334878,0.000041098694,0.00010659378,0.0061682938,0.000026037667,0.0022782946,0.00016265718,0.00019075864,0.000015887588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014180859,0.00016082611,0.23395115,0.00003907724,0.000039600407,0.000056244706,0.0010979648,0.0019456848,0.19268268,0.0014078189,0.0021477134,0.5663294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008683977,0.0008059229,0.6422074,0.00038706805,0.00003896582,0.00013308685,0.0030156244,0.101328835,0.16532078,0.06994368,0.007552502,0.00058219535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030742063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003120215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56574726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017846585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008397886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99706197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770828450","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2017-0026","title":"Expanding the scope of affect: taxonomy construction for emotions, tones, and associations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Originality; Variety (cybernetics); Situated; Taxonomy (biology); Psychology; Reading (process); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology; Linguistics; Communication","score_opus":0.07590749677110867,"score_gpt":0.41091816944013154,"score_spread":0.33501067266902285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770828450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896656,0.0002030135,0.0071036085,0.0007621797,0.00086773373,0.00035447985,0.000019280462,0.0000029762264,0.0010210715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517435,0.00007439766,0.004347567,0.000017019545,0.00013752903,0.000024340168,0.00000513562,0.000004751664,0.00021488286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946356,0.00004987583,0.00027730913,0.000056049896,0.00008495422,0.00006823978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987009,0.00008878996,0.0009206095,0.000116681396,0.00014865935,0.000024331575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040696695,0.000047489673,0.000112010006,0.00007102255,0.00037280205,0.00008983698,0.000083870655,0.0000366738,0.000093221126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073837226,0.000035339035,0.00006358795,0.000028184548,0.000072403454,0.00041374977,0.0000113174565,0.000066222805,0.0000016707288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021563395,0.00042501662,0.47294518,0.000061894854,0.0004988935,0.00000470498,0.003615009,0.00003114117,0.027101139,0.08059122,0.013517783,0.4009924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017421289,0.0002859278,0.9893639,0.000059842914,0.00022405807,0.000067900015,0.0024339696,0.000003131243,0.0029808877,0.0015587943,0.0012145954,0.00006482596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000057730584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016933898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51641876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037225287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021655022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28673297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796106067","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2016-0113","title":"Feeling documents: toward a phenomenology of information seeking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Phenomenology (philosophy); Feeling; Existentialism; Cognition; Originality; Psychology; Consciousness; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Computer science; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Creativity; Communication","score_opus":0.20278971487768432,"score_gpt":0.4657704889685669,"score_spread":0.26298077409088255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796106067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9598417,0.000034152497,0.031330045,0.001629582,0.0007440414,0.00013035849,0.000003968233,0.0000058303126,0.0062802746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99648654,0.0000399313,0.0030105638,0.00015771999,0.000071648086,0.0000017717439,0.000003456515,0.0000026229993,0.00022573168],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973126,0.000055785156,0.0013205969,0.000062318715,0.0011313598,0.00011733511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512887,0.00010313154,0.0037566046,0.00025179682,0.00070656044,0.00005300842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023015297,0.00008067204,0.00022576159,0.00055501726,0.00020136565,0.00084078155,0.0007526741,0.000039462135,0.00044944327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008109375,0.0000618848,0.00011741037,0.00013125676,0.00005478587,0.0119802905,0.000105853826,0.00010083631,0.00009296761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071378384,0.0001885136,0.24987683,0.000093489725,0.00028311138,0.000014237851,0.034644037,0.002730654,0.0064924737,0.020586312,0.013891304,0.67048526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009717961,0.001229692,0.76126707,0.00028926934,0.00034321888,0.000093142575,0.054691724,0.0060925665,0.00600494,0.07266146,0.08696941,0.0006395639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024673298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029531468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6698457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067649984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004768775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86854213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797548704","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2017-0111","title":"“Systemic Managerial Constraints”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grounded theory; Managerialism; Agency (philosophy); Precarity; Sociology; Originality; Context (archaeology); Structure and agency; Qualitative research; Thematic analysis; Information system; Public relations; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.015236049536770045,"score_gpt":0.3516649995912342,"score_spread":0.33642895005446416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797548704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8612716,0.000040034243,0.01300376,0.0016969384,0.0013117992,0.00013997339,0.0000041745907,0.000009305314,0.12252237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99697155,0.000050928586,0.0014146358,0.00009802873,0.0010178952,3.3885954e-7,0.0000013930611,0.0000019493448,0.00044327078],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929106,0.00013154959,0.00022722804,0.000042948282,0.00022866829,0.00007855831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946743,0.00003801263,0.00030422967,0.00004077643,0.00010172998,0.000047795274],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009877615,0.000027179034,0.00008142076,0.00006863575,0.00020776264,0.00026640066,0.00022074202,0.000012648957,0.0011441238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008815665,0.000023120461,0.000040777486,0.000108745386,0.0001540895,0.0008398156,0.000022835715,0.000036314428,0.00003553701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018173628,0.0001577247,0.01703823,0.00002069899,0.00036485557,0.000048918446,0.064497195,0.000018346609,0.027417844,0.20128128,0.047769647,0.6412035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007890592,0.0015688279,0.027902216,0.0010118515,0.0008244353,0.0002555034,0.24368462,0.00021420339,0.006070944,0.09319023,0.6164384,0.0009482072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012785837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001608046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64025533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041731357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000076088654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801307989","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2017-0150","title":"Data rescue archive weather (DRAW)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Metadata; Information repository; Digital preservation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Data quality; Data extraction; World Wide Web; Database; Computer data storage; Engineering","score_opus":0.11657678500123948,"score_gpt":0.42839104480247114,"score_spread":0.3118142598012317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801307989","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009609115,0.000068046684,0.9747076,0.005257078,0.00041459795,0.00011005421,0.00001014995,0.000014211196,0.009809136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54658204,0.0011154362,0.44719613,0.0009561025,0.0014010706,0.0000029378891,0.00004878804,0.000016934166,0.0026805464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986241,0.00018487914,0.00028288693,0.00017577315,0.00059481396,0.00013753815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852663,0.00012222953,0.00031266065,0.00081789016,0.00015230283,0.000068309935],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017206005,0.000055256496,0.00007714304,0.00018570991,0.000079241414,0.001549522,0.002795912,0.000012383328,0.00007922639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003509806,0.000043879074,0.00002171749,0.00022322219,0.000048084315,0.05109816,0.0007976244,0.00012774019,0.0000962206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037027223,0.00052466494,0.0038096055,0.00007024251,0.0006404513,0.00033232453,0.0035882771,0.00009964739,0.016338153,0.34340528,0.30976334,0.32105774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00186614,0.0014694609,0.016100597,0.00010934298,0.00006372,0.0001858952,0.0006451704,0.013912102,0.0035362036,0.02559394,0.9362486,0.00026883316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032296954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039303417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6264852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033760316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006962414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801569311","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2017-0137","title":"“Natural allies”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snowball sampling; Outreach; Originality; Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Political science; Knowledge management; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03249098943109329,"score_gpt":0.276497369952192,"score_spread":0.2440063805210987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801569311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79920995,0.00015880888,0.000021963708,0.00039212112,0.0017902751,0.000037697213,0.0000022292043,0.000010110047,0.19837682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824459,0.000008626338,0.00008684325,0.0004390092,0.0020811884,3.8494701e-7,0.0000025553609,0.0000055798782,0.014929925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944514,0.000015166983,0.00023090992,0.000037205882,0.00019022582,0.00008137786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943626,0.000020323452,0.00018996495,0.000041091644,0.0002829714,0.000029378341],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014145854,0.000051202307,0.000075445554,0.000068943526,0.00013284966,0.0005750732,0.00009298726,0.0000089746245,0.004094183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017442517,0.000038470476,0.00005985744,0.000012804928,0.00011248456,0.0018090814,0.000009893743,0.00007996391,0.000110537076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020136219,0.00010831319,0.000466028,0.000018466963,0.00012831218,0.00002132903,0.06744183,0.0000017531102,0.0005405173,0.8231753,0.07744016,0.030456597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007012896,0.0008185093,0.0011809741,0.000050422394,0.00003796934,0.00003837462,0.013406035,0.00001144066,0.00087156834,0.0323453,0.950401,0.00013711028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010430129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000112685404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87296087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028879453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014489587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885032795","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2018-0057","title":"The lifeways we avoid","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Context (archaeology); Originality; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Conversation; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Political science; Creativity","score_opus":0.03280066827371713,"score_gpt":0.42276617976110725,"score_spread":0.3899655114873901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885032795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14169276,0.001041423,0.0013089792,0.5785285,0.009566234,0.00023212149,4.932118e-7,0.000025625775,0.2676038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852891,0.0011121655,0.000471139,0.0007074267,0.0028172664,0.0000012350927,1.9286878e-7,0.0000033637964,0.009598141],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912643,0.0002786329,0.00017396157,0.000028347118,0.00030624788,0.000086386346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881214,0.00046083238,0.00033623568,0.0000377857,0.00029681507,0.00005618624],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014954705,0.00002569972,0.000038637372,0.0000263298,0.0012718664,0.00021242157,0.00012491229,0.000023946559,0.0011871443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071811245,0.000018175268,0.000035769805,0.0002482439,0.0001356361,0.000562619,0.0000046529426,0.00008555236,0.00020388256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014258568,0.0000795004,0.0033878458,0.0000028340917,0.00007111903,0.0000016174703,0.15153515,0.0000015145101,0.0003602222,0.20447643,0.4533219,0.18661927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011885202,0.00004794906,0.0016294215,0.0000046382743,0.000013476157,0.0000017778468,0.048404306,6.6662045e-7,0.00017136762,0.013336622,0.9362471,0.000023801414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006110328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020632258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84359634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008197661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021560342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889328087","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2018-0037","title":"Documenting acousmatic music interpretation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Interpretation (philosophy); Originality; Relation (database); Point (geometry); Grounded theory; Computer science; Epistemology; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science; Data mining","score_opus":0.017850066793592242,"score_gpt":0.33645740436998517,"score_spread":0.3186073375763929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889328087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.936734,0.00017369291,0.03314372,0.0001337412,0.0019963647,0.00012501553,9.650028e-7,0.000018499566,0.027674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99614227,0.0000079451975,0.0015187648,0.00047964673,0.0008262968,0.0000058890714,0.000006917282,0.000012935394,0.0009993493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882114,0.00015334488,0.0005150782,0.000102147795,0.00026389834,0.00014437898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988717,0.000066067034,0.0006466375,0.000100224745,0.00026560132,0.000049790706],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005471311,0.00008925402,0.0001420634,0.000208064,0.00007628656,0.000095226904,0.00010662472,0.000047604222,0.0066391896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000634211,0.00007547566,0.000091756185,0.00017484657,0.00004127457,0.00069855957,0.000011534917,0.00011639456,0.00044125126],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013061034,0.00056893966,0.0045346655,0.000100593155,0.00092218217,0.000111818386,0.17809145,0.000021624943,0.063634396,0.0075933477,0.020102285,0.7230126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03410847,0.014066974,0.31645444,0.002329101,0.0045838133,0.0040108813,0.28159422,0.0029889622,0.109730035,0.21054395,0.016813459,0.0027757043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028444696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014830475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7202369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006098022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020733127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917432326","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2018-0125","title":"Patterns of citations for the growth of knowledge: a Foucauldian perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Citation; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Knowledge management; Social science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3639709923264734,"score_gpt":0.5913081892117475,"score_spread":0.22733719688527415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917432326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.962219,0.0006447208,0.032596454,0.0023794216,0.0006117903,0.00037405564,0.000031856143,0.0000010563772,0.0011416577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982113,0.00011990203,0.0010170279,0.00001865916,0.00005367206,0.0000031658276,5.973493e-7,0.0000037182465,0.00057192385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965483,0.000109350636,0.00070221437,0.00011422386,0.002405149,0.000120771016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98398167,0.0058913305,0.00094954483,0.00016641691,0.008943749,0.00006727316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007433784,0.000050754374,0.00019323124,0.012451723,0.000056834342,0.00022038884,0.00073420873,0.000029120933,0.000332907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095245475,0.000028216991,0.00019986721,0.020628227,0.000037045065,0.0006669422,0.000057437894,0.00009326709,0.000015116995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030427394,0.00061708986,0.85209125,0.000072025185,0.0002826991,0.0000013740872,0.012602901,0.00041149225,0.015429454,0.0509402,0.013343714,0.05390355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024749786,0.0016554361,0.87148976,0.0000521454,0.00006353601,0.000011459366,0.036870882,0.0024145287,0.015584666,0.067827746,0.0014479224,0.00010693085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007640768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019096346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05379662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000092637565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019448389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99881864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947696923","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2018-0143","title":"Emerging practices for managing user misconduct in online news media comments sections","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Originality; Public relations; Narrative; Value (mathematics); Misconduct; Sociology; Journalism; Work (physics); User-generated content; Social media; Knowledge management; Political science; Creativity; Psychology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Media studies; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06653161152201145,"score_gpt":0.4472581973129245,"score_spread":0.380726585790913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947696923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846712,0.00007226117,0.000120507546,0.011553332,0.0021160448,0.00020954077,0.0000032501898,0.0000049522664,0.0012489333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945985,0.00032597053,0.002848546,0.0006124244,0.0010504153,0.00000421495,0.000009271552,0.00000772184,0.00054291537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991094,0.00013847426,0.0002854431,0.000054842858,0.00026263593,0.00014920147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986428,0.0005248797,0.0006228693,0.000035732257,0.00011275417,0.000060962233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042012363,0.000045876757,0.000109981986,0.00013954053,0.00010705286,0.00007307075,0.00009207229,0.000039276383,0.00013347954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058538094,0.000045084584,0.00005092537,0.00016237544,0.000021928518,0.000991899,0.0000067855576,0.0001233105,0.0000060449],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016648498,0.00044064084,0.6444286,0.000089616646,0.00016933153,0.000010838479,0.28696772,0.00036076547,0.003103327,0.015864473,0.009138224,0.039259974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028717704,0.00017653088,0.013388789,0.00015921492,0.0001169598,0.000004656379,0.6917544,0.000070815506,0.00067888614,0.017462404,0.2731258,0.00018977329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025788317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044404184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6310398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016412375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011863383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3898439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954119398","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2018-0184","title":"Mitigating risk: mediating transition through the enactment of information literacy practices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Grounded theory; Information literacy; Context (archaeology); Originality; Sociology; Literacy; Qualitative research; Constructivist grounded theory; Social constructivism; Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Public relations; Social science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.041681115129757376,"score_gpt":0.416762787159714,"score_spread":0.3750816720299566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954119398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9871681,0.00014642795,0.0010518067,0.004445571,0.0007824768,0.00014168334,0.0000022832326,0.000006053081,0.0062556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603033,0.00022182665,0.0032369292,0.00016165791,0.00029712595,0.000001735068,0.000004173953,0.0000024003677,0.00004380872],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986578,0.0002905687,0.00045715418,0.0000360081,0.0004701018,0.000088323795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966284,0.0005589849,0.0024986414,0.00004715971,0.0002359934,0.0000308052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013605392,0.00004308656,0.0000975128,0.000053904176,0.00021255303,0.00009174482,0.000097744916,0.000033197946,0.00014503626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006817193,0.000028155926,0.0000623948,0.00014786744,0.000043226635,0.0032721418,0.0000034855977,0.0001624981,0.0000104056135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040747724,0.000049519545,0.0072196126,0.000035153123,0.000040395167,2.7130707e-7,0.959007,0.00049314275,0.0004966922,0.0026845683,0.0003602259,0.029572645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001522491,0.0006318475,0.010721387,0.00023218205,0.00021408308,0.000008916369,0.8860715,0.00024523956,0.0014332826,0.008634928,0.09010943,0.0001746816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014264635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029366542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08974921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014729486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017866387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23722237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956110834","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2018-0172","title":"The reading background of Goodreads book club members: a female fiction canon?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Themes in Literature Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Theme (computing); Reading (process); Originality; Value (mathematics); Literature; History; Psychology; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Social science; Linguistics; World Wide Web; Medicine; Qualitative research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014484140758376873,"score_gpt":0.2728159470650433,"score_spread":0.2583318063066664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956110834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8891877,0.0020598439,0.00008925123,0.0005035681,0.0016893565,0.00016951957,0.000006720535,0.000009870874,0.10628419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97796434,0.00013579453,0.00012160506,0.00012803456,0.0005040961,0.0000014496022,0.00000557605,0.000009132976,0.02112995],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903166,0.000068835245,0.00045563327,0.00006339244,0.00028670765,0.00009378494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881494,0.0001332558,0.00067098206,0.00012441802,0.00023159987,0.000024813098],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042859802,0.00007329101,0.00015434223,0.000107762484,0.00013271067,0.00026499789,0.00012437392,0.000023436374,0.0023020806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011591842,0.0000478582,0.00013548226,0.000049389666,0.000053166084,0.0011371189,0.0000128565125,0.00011761576,0.000019486273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00084064616,0.0003480689,0.007076936,0.00025941659,0.0024065708,0.00001438171,0.19531208,0.0011539044,0.013345975,0.6477621,0.11783926,0.013640609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001237528,0.00066232384,0.0007164721,0.00025132307,0.00047860315,0.00003806312,0.059431892,0.00018388414,0.004062922,0.0035657552,0.92917025,0.00020099855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007087419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000111320915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.811331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089072666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002915801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963526428","doi":"10.1108/jd-12-2018-0211","title":"Maturing research data services and the transformation of academic libraries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"RDM; Originality; Capability Maturity Model; Service (business); Maturity (psychological); Data science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Transformational leadership; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Political science; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Publishing; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.13758351398406676,"score_gpt":0.4348543227040539,"score_spread":0.2972708087199871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963526428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9245747,0.0018812234,0.04639523,0.023416448,0.00025703042,0.00062432233,0.000005578471,0.000011262789,0.002834223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99029106,0.003977609,0.0055132955,0.00006633969,0.000039590035,0.0000013064237,0.0000073872557,0.000002623117,0.00010079157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982756,0.00036545505,0.00033914475,0.000100846235,0.00081530947,0.00010366026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985331,0.00054149324,0.00036461174,0.00040994157,0.00012346005,0.00002734227],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00602362,0.00003836683,0.00009130504,0.00021836303,0.00006740683,0.0012425568,0.0020978071,0.00002105809,0.000009680585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009737916,0.000023950073,0.00001354718,0.0002887488,0.00006225205,0.08770283,0.0005945235,0.00031477885,0.00000541183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000678968,0.000045258366,0.004594244,0.000910119,0.00017751624,0.0000048306792,0.015077563,0.0002050955,0.007190028,0.92629355,0.00087110844,0.04395171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.030686017,0.0023078597,0.15480526,0.0027532815,0.00030267885,0.00040241884,0.06757219,0.290056,0.08322262,0.23980507,0.12721038,0.0008762384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003703867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026443954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6864885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013209929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044450288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978591550","doi":"10.1108/jd-12-2018-0209","title":"Disinformation and misinformation triangle","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; Misinformation; Social media; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); Media literacy; Computer science; Digital media; Sociology; Data science; Public relations; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer security; Media studies","score_opus":0.008770396463127923,"score_gpt":0.320689587587003,"score_spread":0.31191919112387506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978591550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93666196,0.000039697105,0.0012196942,0.0011583916,0.00034540574,0.00017126321,7.5553135e-7,0.0000097167385,0.06039312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980287,0.00019812808,0.00053119054,0.00028772655,0.00008137423,1.5087059e-7,0.000004700027,0.0000020132068,0.00086599175],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906105,0.00004577097,0.00039422553,0.0000214765,0.0003906957,0.00008677603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915504,0.00004962634,0.0005191362,0.00003745331,0.00015926427,0.00007950394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009759901,0.000041180414,0.000089650945,0.00016374266,0.000103726015,0.00021439006,0.000055091128,0.00003656917,0.0005644715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015472839,0.000035100285,0.00003427802,0.00013446197,0.000021711936,0.0057685794,0.0000054597335,0.000056576562,0.00009992762],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029472457,0.000060763665,0.0056715445,0.00011211977,0.00006295152,0.0000010022892,0.48145995,0.00045921345,0.00091902853,0.07776754,0.014660591,0.41853058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011924292,0.001133399,0.13575922,0.00034091517,0.000114508264,0.00010036218,0.421224,0.002792484,0.0028950726,0.009166954,0.4139285,0.00062028214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029893155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007806174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4179103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008477317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009141588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6180568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988841194","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2019-0055","title":"Conceptualizing information work for health contexts in Library and Information Science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Information behavior; Information science; Work (physics); Originality; Invisibility; Sociology; Computer science; Personal information management; Scholarship; Information system; Knowledge management; Data science; Dichotomy; Value (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Management information systems; Social science; Human–computer interaction; Library science; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.013715434204117503,"score_gpt":0.33794754506492564,"score_spread":0.3242321108608081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988841194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855699,0.00005691184,0.0006281288,0.008428052,0.0004139614,0.00045113117,0.0000022300153,0.0000095591195,0.0044401353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964938,0.00020767986,0.0014070728,0.0017906944,0.00004686264,0.0000022813165,0.000007776156,0.0000011028627,0.00004271011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990637,0.00004669843,0.00040624858,0.000040006784,0.0003110998,0.0001323053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926096,0.00007373666,0.0004935873,0.00003092927,0.00006237576,0.00007843503],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010490535,0.000037585083,0.00008233734,0.00027928373,0.00016787573,0.0005037776,0.000111384805,0.000023047787,0.000043521522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000951985,0.00003412757,0.000017630107,0.0005398649,0.00010825308,0.10763966,0.000010644432,0.0000517986,0.0000066672374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028893238,0.000035199457,0.18654925,0.0000868782,0.000006472302,3.1979144e-7,0.15931448,0.0003594777,0.00027600495,0.5244737,0.0014709317,0.12713833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059035076,0.0017429598,0.5072714,0.00062785984,0.000011159498,0.000010368425,0.16845529,0.0006615943,0.0023412255,0.013708583,0.2988343,0.00043174837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001696384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000355715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51076514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053314023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069227593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9048413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007649223","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2019-0067","title":"The red thread of information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"BATES; Information science; Originality; Computer science; Information literacy; Epistemology; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Library science","score_opus":0.016151039477205413,"score_gpt":0.2646027759344889,"score_spread":0.24845173645728347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007649223","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13346519,0.00024082724,0.82320005,0.04110844,0.00049109635,0.00009127157,2.751422e-7,0.000017014436,0.0013858324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864616,0.000085832384,0.013081284,0.00033090654,0.000034854886,3.1304097e-7,2.3213451e-7,5.963808e-7,0.00000442942],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994543,0.00002361139,0.00027324958,0.000019418532,0.00018888756,0.00004052093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993375,0.00006552671,0.00039641457,0.000054758002,0.00012620221,0.000019608326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019542883,0.00002457646,0.000055587534,0.000023920962,0.000033658464,0.000086458516,0.00025926117,0.000010403345,0.0000032977116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012406972,0.000014665447,0.000031761876,0.000105584615,0.000012347519,0.0015229206,0.00002398231,0.000039642193,0.00000470775],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024316998,0.000045078657,0.010622384,0.00007452815,0.00014581098,0.000009590446,0.026969334,0.0013816563,0.010274724,0.23512888,0.028683534,0.68642133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007706619,0.0043781884,0.31510592,0.00021792242,0.00014536986,0.00026280546,0.016395297,0.04912418,0.25169045,0.27179384,0.08262878,0.0005506151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029433807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.8741394e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85299635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009436781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029461058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11040807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011107083","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2019-0076","title":"Information and contemplation: a call for reflection and action","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Meditation; Originality; Epistemology; Wonder; Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Philosophy; Qualitative research; Theology","score_opus":0.07026668982467237,"score_gpt":0.4162822061813308,"score_spread":0.34601551635665845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011107083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94909734,0.00026835958,0.046399318,0.0021657096,0.00041349066,0.00020509808,0.0000028936893,0.000008863,0.0014389114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983615,0.00006599324,0.00075933296,0.00055488874,0.0001650233,0.000007033777,0.0000047110707,0.0000020428788,0.00007944091],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995864,0.000020812811,0.0002387405,0.000033479024,0.000074508054,0.000046081437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995637,0.000028036467,0.00026802666,0.000015419622,0.00007889309,0.000045903056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011717644,0.000037590067,0.00006851962,0.000044130637,0.00005081214,0.000053136984,0.000016813397,0.00003093889,0.000038660157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026240443,0.00003239409,0.000017693048,0.000051304425,0.000012567499,0.0012255916,0.0000034034856,0.000045449993,0.0000033171088],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007975024,0.00011284456,0.02276933,0.00024453684,0.0002991558,0.00000519542,0.16164227,0.0002327649,0.04471131,0.025482938,0.015827054,0.7206976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022727802,0.011793309,0.24390514,0.00010990815,0.0003070281,0.0010335952,0.06732795,0.0056243446,0.010025676,0.003450384,0.6330841,0.0006107445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017873768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002972485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7200868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015453126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009310277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13209927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016068426","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2019-0187","title":"Unbundling practice: the unbundling of big deal journal packages as an information practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Unbundling; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Big data; Practice theory; Originality; Computer science; Data science; Management science; Social science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.018029159177375586,"score_gpt":0.284386201754067,"score_spread":0.2663570425766914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016068426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5257606,0.0019531609,0.12628572,0.2809323,0.0034012033,0.0012331537,0.0000038985413,0.00011756877,0.060312405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800788,0.00038980378,0.004048429,0.012753987,0.002679349,0.000001199014,0.000013029047,0.000013856223,0.000021502383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981521,0.00006162368,0.0007880888,0.00007008941,0.00079699635,0.00013114182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953683,0.00022947945,0.0027307526,0.00006500625,0.0015813961,0.000025090581],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014080702,0.00012035695,0.00016995627,0.00020231203,0.00037363247,0.0009200741,0.00025679625,0.000032472566,0.00015923548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024658248,0.00008627381,0.00007284646,0.0005783197,0.0000357942,0.018073125,0.00008888297,0.00025020854,0.000054745175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006575537,0.0015607151,0.07939658,0.001876651,0.004513703,0.00022591696,0.043938555,0.049144637,0.003636538,0.43124342,0.09259379,0.28529397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004231316,0.0006485114,0.015685452,0.0002255926,0.001992587,0.00023422475,0.12367797,0.0031220738,0.0006316579,0.016642569,0.83239233,0.0005157097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007790364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009009147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73979855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048619506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065954686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102117701","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2020-0137","title":"Information experiences of Bangladeshi immigrants in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Settlement (finance); Descriptive statistics; Ethnic group; Refugee; Sociology; Personally identifiable information; Public relations; Geography; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015599122079842823,"score_gpt":0.3007575732186039,"score_spread":0.2851584511387611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102117701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970174,0.00003256567,0.000031284097,0.0019507401,0.00034652057,0.00004599089,0.0000010621774,0.0000010375718,0.0005734088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99930257,0.000048094476,0.00007809089,0.0004377645,0.00012804058,0.0000011506705,8.121525e-7,8.6094144e-7,0.0000026051757],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918985,0.00006365892,0.00030133376,0.00001384203,0.00035755415,0.00007377249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994823,0.000068081856,0.00028327655,0.000011967643,0.00008610035,0.000068312096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000115984985,0.000024457415,0.00008006412,0.000035774574,0.000030406145,0.000016917482,0.00007665205,0.000016940658,0.00011431961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026929786,0.00002306893,0.000019060471,0.00017140324,0.0000275377,0.0007770118,0.0000031387606,0.00004909654,0.0000012641804],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019896817,0.0000048401685,0.04913526,0.000009657166,0.0000049309992,0.0000018668692,0.9446178,0.000025560634,0.000098946184,0.00061945984,0.00091907877,0.0045426977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002790358,0.000041073978,0.008424337,0.000015475796,0.0000048803868,3.391702e-7,0.9858369,0.000011788285,0.0019711712,0.00019979324,0.0031856943,0.000029511693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6752569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42212272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25313416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017692795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010045301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58842206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112453499","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2020-0034","title":"Organizing personal digital information: an analysis of faculty member activities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Personal information management; Knowledge management; Originality; Personally identifiable information; Apprehension; Information literacy; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Information system; Public relations; Pedagogy; Computer science; Management information systems; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.24437275792586696,"score_gpt":0.45034288393518535,"score_spread":0.20597012600931838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112453499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900062,0.0000053281774,0.008104253,0.00090944825,0.00006974866,0.00004968668,0.0000510312,0.0000071963746,0.00079709047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988009,0.0000031277593,0.0005812396,0.00040334382,0.00005390933,5.237554e-7,0.00006773046,0.000002365192,0.00008688488],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737185,0.00003872527,0.0009424021,0.000065935135,0.0015012715,0.000079785576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979765,0.00009259736,0.0012180249,0.000070410904,0.000535114,0.00010738608],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005902207,0.000079765094,0.00025849373,0.0005880732,0.000063079824,0.0007304787,0.00027909176,0.000026798825,0.001476674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026088225,0.00005966203,0.00019840077,0.0012577013,0.000028707502,0.01679471,0.000038977927,0.00008132827,0.000041425574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007420777,0.00023210916,0.60911566,0.000044740733,0.0018816465,0.000011719766,0.2056586,0.014313357,0.0027460996,0.0018145371,0.018841026,0.1445984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024595105,0.0008862722,0.5874126,0.00002356497,0.001726608,0.000018414241,0.32091665,0.058669914,0.0034952154,0.00047144698,0.0234801,0.00043970122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000047073395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027083586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14415869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041455176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045961617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127942799","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2020-0051","title":"Perceptions and experiences of virtual reality in public libraries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Media, Religion, Digital Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Sociology; Conversation; Virtual reality; Public relations; Situated; Mainstream; Sociotechnical system; Perception; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Knowledge management; Social science; Qualitative research; Political science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.06022043366209056,"score_gpt":0.30262285681894496,"score_spread":0.2424024231568544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127942799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.972504,0.00039460292,0.000071023016,0.0010653117,0.00012592871,0.0000313429,0.000002031318,0.000003154083,0.025802609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991555,0.00033909437,0.00014032175,0.000052558345,0.00006848198,0.0000030665071,0.000011721843,0.000002685422,0.00022652683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931633,0.00009074379,0.0003450946,0.000042757976,0.00015686714,0.000048189566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942297,0.00008210129,0.00022584098,0.00007228616,0.00016749298,0.000029332405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017801902,0.000038362497,0.00009812531,0.00010119044,0.00006934924,0.00029581264,0.00007014687,0.000014860737,0.00042974207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011058892,0.000033293098,0.000027650549,0.000048646718,0.00017030381,0.0017984986,0.000026110603,0.00006457872,0.0000010418266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025306832,0.00014251287,0.0024736242,0.000022585882,0.000020308602,0.0000031556185,0.5205046,0.00000699661,0.0005932812,0.46797422,0.0009561964,0.0072772023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014989873,0.0006369445,0.020070503,0.00022576627,0.00004271977,0.00006400042,0.79662484,0.0001137115,0.0041121654,0.16875148,0.007629924,0.00022896258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030569965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024576104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29922274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020089863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008496376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47053742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133689386","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2020-0185","title":"The image of the library through the eyes of immigrant and migrant readers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Typology; Immigration; Sociocultural evolution; Sociology; Perception; Qualitative research; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.015877510298866544,"score_gpt":0.30933186191507805,"score_spread":0.29345435161621153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133689386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9262478,0.00081711775,0.000055067598,0.07030471,0.00025284366,0.00009296792,0.0000027920541,0.0000020608595,0.002224642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974065,0.0011402678,0.0004758488,0.00023218752,0.00008460622,5.780356e-7,6.2992655e-7,0.0000019783322,0.0006574255],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990086,0.00023462773,0.00027593903,0.000044023982,0.00036465868,0.00007216564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919504,0.00022591636,0.00041638006,0.00007806485,0.000065201435,0.000019399069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041965191,0.00003483659,0.0000680764,0.000011124199,0.0003319914,0.00014790935,0.00020700747,0.000017885111,0.00004709363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000983599,0.000015415411,0.00006941698,0.00024426988,0.0004293021,0.002051696,0.000021531341,0.00006590626,3.5152144e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024788012,0.0002354853,0.04788027,0.000082083774,0.00020222267,0.00001983511,0.64194804,0.000064945285,0.10859018,0.1410943,0.030765163,0.028869601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006674774,0.00022850056,0.10011966,0.00017058235,0.00009443098,0.000029288429,0.58360267,0.000024908426,0.18970597,0.059249766,0.06599802,0.00010874758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020463669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001494208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08184453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000059771974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023933158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2553443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158340182","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2021-0039","title":"Mapping knowledge domains on Wikipedia: an author bibliographic coupling analysis of traditional Chinese medicine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliographic coupling; Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Information retrieval; Domain knowledge; Traditional Chinese medicine; Traditional medicine; Citation; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.053348840413957654,"score_gpt":0.4173004327378051,"score_spread":0.36395159232384744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158340182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98960537,0.00026394048,0.0017173284,0.003833875,0.0010282894,0.00006360071,0.0000056453596,0.000007930017,0.0034740416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974484,0.00041809573,0.0007035036,0.00012669899,0.0010913238,0.0000028433426,0.00005493301,0.000004530673,0.00014970478],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842614,0.00020872013,0.0005274575,0.0001033777,0.0006401335,0.00009416124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979037,0.00032813664,0.0005797846,0.000082836865,0.0009935318,0.0001120213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013788696,0.00006995667,0.00022563004,0.0028714244,0.00022865516,0.00007146491,0.000107522515,0.000054678076,0.0007872937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042533627,0.000061011553,0.000121219695,0.010784835,0.00010383545,0.00075138424,0.0000041402027,0.000107611835,0.0000017901361],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003137991,0.0042473846,0.35725078,0.00010685184,0.0036502592,0.000038874023,0.3487299,0.02073138,0.031607453,0.19949007,0.018254219,0.015579022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015661978,0.0005012109,0.8502465,0.00015455863,0.0008395529,0.000005665466,0.123234816,0.0023549004,0.00036426247,0.015684148,0.00482745,0.0002207252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055829663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086286827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49299574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010840313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034849008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8620314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174350654","doi":"10.1108/jd-01-2021-0018","title":"Do they practice what they preach? The presence of problematic citations in business ethics research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Business ethics; Originality; Minor (academic); Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Research ethics; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1400330230487862,"score_gpt":0.48422085709694807,"score_spread":0.3441878340481619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174350654","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3795517,0.0030686243,0.0018916304,0.5867354,0.0011378691,0.0010126685,0.000004200976,0.000010056959,0.026587786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883304,0.008903997,0.0020823171,0.00023889168,0.0001533857,0.000008098688,0.0000017962251,0.000004397657,0.00027668392],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935439,0.004204002,0.0005178213,0.00008662964,0.0014769615,0.0001706865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987609,0.008536304,0.0005350685,0.000107096705,0.0031726079,0.00003991732],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019898433,0.000051070452,0.00012454698,0.00013745003,0.0003560059,0.0003445207,0.0003167591,0.00022534825,0.000077536635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025651915,0.00003570109,0.00003994031,0.0006635298,0.0001677728,0.003281471,0.000036653302,0.0020520182,0.000006205006],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008660414,0.0002080191,0.0011064146,0.00012426458,0.00005510982,0.000020785812,0.7842603,0.0015758161,0.0020977904,0.2043151,0.0014312885,0.004718562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003761127,0.00005730449,0.004528396,0.0011519467,0.000049817354,0.000037612754,0.6521978,0.000051312843,0.00064611476,0.33511502,0.005717249,0.0000713108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022082073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026397377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6087787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013591307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012664617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98255545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179213823","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2020-0183","title":"A thematic analysis of library association policies on services to persons with disabilities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Professional association; Thematic analysis; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Library science; Accreditation; Political science; Originality; Sociology; Law; Qualitative research; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.016201255122726403,"score_gpt":0.3316751737871444,"score_spread":0.315473918664418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179213823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794145,0.000038030474,0.000020214819,0.004048853,0.000046434317,0.00009417603,0.00002688546,0.000011301848,0.016299605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965396,0.000015139025,0.00044161928,0.00020933922,0.000061434366,0.0000036305496,0.000008102312,0.0000057879024,0.0027153285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984278,0.00017708432,0.00040108766,0.00009314953,0.00077081675,0.00013002749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984701,0.00063081074,0.000483136,0.00008873423,0.00025104065,0.00007617199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043668973,0.000071394395,0.0002716319,0.00025015904,0.000095716394,0.00033205157,0.0001576517,0.00003276603,0.0004597781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042538063,0.000055562432,0.00017446617,0.001195792,0.00007405778,0.002045657,0.000022828368,0.000055569544,0.000004000477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011171694,0.00039313367,0.7448221,0.00014138604,0.0011382112,0.0000014302767,0.23012406,0.0013265755,0.00015871413,0.020032829,0.0003696356,0.0013802493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031059934,0.00037691812,0.13992555,0.00022669467,0.00087973714,8.8363623e-7,0.84587973,0.000024880379,0.0017344283,0.010009814,0.0004936002,0.00013716558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035146315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018488144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6157557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002507399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017552958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50342476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180934268","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2021-0024","title":"“So many things were new to us”: identifying the settlement information practices of newcomers to Canada across the settlement process","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Originality; Process (computing); Public relations; Information needs; Sociology; Information system; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Library science; Qualitative research; Social science; Computer science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.032324191481344966,"score_gpt":0.39291376708585923,"score_spread":0.36058957560451427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180934268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8263887,0.00004756157,0.0010916995,0.17066227,0.0006933825,0.00034856386,0.000015549911,0.0000040039085,0.0007482279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99008626,0.00005461231,0.00072843424,0.008341203,0.00021357495,0.0000050209296,0.0000122065985,0.0000028172997,0.0005558573],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795836,0.0001338839,0.0005054647,0.00007291186,0.001152677,0.00017668837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829966,0.000114398696,0.001079597,0.000092233895,0.00028812865,0.00012598599],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013992084,0.0000646835,0.00009033371,0.000038111284,0.0006195442,0.0008568844,0.00034918153,0.000019002913,0.00018557905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035119368,0.00004140496,0.000040040875,0.00048998476,0.000035140496,0.0052835327,0.000041385872,0.00010515843,0.0000055326973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015589758,0.00008136603,0.029857004,0.000110205416,0.00015585884,0.0000150016685,0.80275756,0.006008646,0.0033669244,0.0058295173,0.08192093,0.06974109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037132748,0.00015056523,0.031831354,0.000108151464,0.000046514233,0.000010456075,0.60664344,0.000026031375,0.014644531,0.00095143,0.3450914,0.0001247961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.069083914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17860079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26317048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018107065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025696754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93711513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181891334","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2020-0149","title":"Sharing experiential information in online discussion: the case of coping with the COVID-19 epidemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Psychology; Originality; Cognition; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.04049234714435527,"score_gpt":0.3995205792643016,"score_spread":0.35902823211994633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181891334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501144,0.00004665749,0.0055327197,0.043411165,0.000147346,0.00012416032,0.000002544081,0.0000033654605,0.00061763736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971278,0.000077116914,0.00023030968,0.0024030942,0.000076753495,7.182839e-7,0.000005979903,0.000001441204,0.00007682405],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905264,0.0001571606,0.00040584223,0.000026456486,0.00027642184,0.00008148941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905646,0.00011762819,0.00055284804,0.00006359423,0.00014626353,0.00006322872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011756294,0.000038478942,0.00007880878,0.000068952475,0.00024142957,0.00012433589,0.0001009402,0.000022193703,0.0002485994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058857707,0.000017094897,0.000032021202,0.00028906812,0.00006430608,0.0020664218,0.00001799091,0.00010836693,0.0000012947885],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015463536,0.0000551436,0.0022641104,0.000048291826,0.000032047796,0.000073893025,0.9573166,0.008379799,0.00021053565,0.007330187,0.007533084,0.016601723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015232315,0.00007623966,0.0018610355,0.00008048217,0.00002697712,0.0005809156,0.9604302,0.0006252633,0.00042999035,0.00062895013,0.03366057,0.00007615669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042156997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017157126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04701336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013263429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034336475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2721989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193846972","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2021-0049","title":"Wikipedia: an unexplored resource for understanding consumer health information behaviour in library and information science scholarship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Scholarship; Computer science; Medical library; Information seeking; Information behavior; Sociology; Conceptual framework; Relation (database); Layperson; Conceptual model; Situated; Knowledge management; Data science; Social science; Information retrieval; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.04485993649630779,"score_gpt":0.37975557348266603,"score_spread":0.33489563698635827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193846972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970684,0.00017045917,0.0059368955,0.019743944,0.0006458225,0.0004478922,0.000008999941,0.000021764921,0.002340217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433947,0.0005038636,0.0037559448,0.0012256788,0.00009222869,0.000007504439,0.000054817236,0.0000029481148,0.00001754918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987199,0.00017327887,0.00048149462,0.00005785412,0.00042609844,0.0001414216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989512,0.00007881418,0.00051257934,0.00005457775,0.0002726276,0.00013017784],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016536802,0.000049985752,0.000090577334,0.00044297136,0.00044132432,0.00086148625,0.00009234662,0.000042715976,0.000022198321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042309705,0.00005366708,0.000017029479,0.0008883531,0.00010404764,0.05954616,0.000012077052,0.000105397216,0.0000011694157],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023593447,0.00015040606,0.10126702,0.00008384304,0.000013225345,0.000001183969,0.17477997,0.0002447431,0.00030077118,0.67863554,0.0015098194,0.042777557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034861057,0.00041861137,0.18397567,0.00020732179,0.000030087069,0.000019125915,0.722122,0.00024499052,0.0013237026,0.029657973,0.058227777,0.00028659875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018895487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008220617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6489776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000350362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016446126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9536075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194625426","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2021-0041","title":"Preservation for diverse users: digital preservation and the “Designated Community” at the Ontario Jewish Archives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital preservation; Identification (biology); Context (archaeology); Computer science; World Wide Web; Originality; USable; Conversation; Digital library; Sociology; Qualitative research; History","score_opus":0.052874292588095395,"score_gpt":0.2384055915849584,"score_spread":0.185531298996863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194625426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93692935,0.0001251552,0.0020987226,0.007119402,0.00030316296,0.0005383639,0.000053413445,0.00001039978,0.052822057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749228,0.000032689873,0.000126616,0.0004566527,0.00016068883,0.00002012783,0.00019178771,0.000006160613,0.024082528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993122,0.00010752265,0.00025504947,0.000054914493,0.00019617635,0.00007413627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987832,0.00073815964,0.00025226353,0.00008427129,0.00011942538,0.00002268102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019055055,0.0000696748,0.000093283226,0.00003627564,0.00057628105,0.0007583127,0.0001263567,0.0000059136796,0.000092291564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006666083,0.000039502447,0.000086774,0.00002237275,0.00021591631,0.0023735005,0.00008569792,0.00012102958,0.0000021538576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013864685,0.00037783384,0.0017601887,0.00014052355,0.00070433924,0.0000075171297,0.18340163,0.0003477569,0.0001339287,0.73988044,0.010678345,0.061181035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043363916,0.00033621618,0.0380606,0.00010935014,0.00022265998,0.000017200924,0.0136083225,0.00037190496,0.0002552968,0.74140847,0.201139,0.000134553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003517938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041179424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19046067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040666437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029827625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73124266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197846497","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0119","title":"Intellectual structure of information science 2011–2020: an author co-citation analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Co-citation; Citation; Dominance (genetics); Specialty; Information science; Computer science; Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Data science; Web of science; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology; MEDLINE; Political science; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.286229173528639,"score_gpt":0.5805644529410221,"score_spread":0.2943352794123831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197846497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435525,0.0000900696,0.05525596,0.00033382874,0.00034367476,0.00006064887,0.000023926938,0.0000024839028,0.0003369389],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927154,0.00007803296,0.006985927,0.000053792384,0.00004619553,2.7309073e-7,0.000022503802,0.000002132239,0.00009574402],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98941135,0.00024790224,0.0012662114,0.00018773024,0.008690562,0.0001962115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98480487,0.0012441255,0.0013229768,0.00027710115,0.0121106375,0.00024029642],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.011691111,0.00007694072,0.0002697307,0.05218516,0.00017129457,0.0020915524,0.00090451527,0.00005553896,0.0031351333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026431123,0.00005560663,0.00015793426,0.14576642,0.00015933588,0.009190271,0.00009231918,0.00017761813,0.000041911848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003077735,0.00036057856,0.17003584,0.000026711761,0.00041752364,0.000021894082,0.018021716,0.016903922,0.33677372,0.0028433101,0.012719061,0.44156793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012561929,0.0009620355,0.68144983,0.000013350366,0.00022798136,0.000082052284,0.019313764,0.029047014,0.25018418,0.0145786805,0.002652045,0.00023290004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022348388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014784044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.511414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001724472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072565925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202319391","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2020-0200","title":"Reading time: exploring the temporal experiences of reading","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Reading (process); Conversation; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Originality; Value (mathematics); Bricolage; Everyday life; Sociology; Linguistics; Visual arts; Epistemology; Qualitative research; Art; History; Social science; Communication; Political science","score_opus":0.0519408331053108,"score_gpt":0.3499105937891513,"score_spread":0.2979697606838405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202319391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99230486,0.000039883653,0.00014058911,0.0018827004,0.00045154177,0.00003699298,2.0076307e-7,0.0000042472843,0.005139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976754,0.00009224226,0.00092755235,0.00006770625,0.0002565495,0.0000022164509,0.0000011103442,0.0000019009796,0.00097531354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989886,0.00014608569,0.00029036935,0.000056133027,0.0004285849,0.000090178095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993473,0.00010936179,0.00033666877,0.000048493548,0.00011507034,0.00004308886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081280817,0.00003497452,0.00007890587,0.000045865552,0.00025041227,0.00016124279,0.00014118555,0.0000146786715,0.00032731035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017621227,0.000024902149,0.000042334133,0.00032241785,0.00009495655,0.0034568778,0.000011131363,0.0000561209,0.0000046616055],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004246776,0.00008025426,0.018310774,0.000015159747,0.00003894208,0.000042927775,0.8679723,0.0001015791,0.06848339,0.021123176,0.0027866035,0.021002408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022714816,0.00017544888,0.0036451863,0.00011797607,0.000022996914,0.000021874272,0.8518024,0.000041990803,0.13267669,0.0036094985,0.0075627193,0.00009602925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040955096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007772039,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06419331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003132427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026632505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35838187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203741099","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2020-0196","title":"Documenting multiple temporalities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Situated; Variety (cybernetics); Originality; Temporality; Indexicality; Articulation (sociology); Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Computer science; Epistemology; Social science; Politics; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.017727519178310135,"score_gpt":0.2991930271499754,"score_spread":0.2814655079716653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203741099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67474556,0.00013135021,0.31832582,0.0033298265,0.0012189045,0.000053319112,3.9157757e-7,0.000045679546,0.002149175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94682556,0.000013726196,0.0520882,0.00026558497,0.0000968762,0.0000017048064,0.00000207745,0.0000041094804,0.0007021623],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902827,0.00007520073,0.0004307673,0.00010237525,0.0002552176,0.000108177825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986292,0.0000773191,0.00055299455,0.00013917347,0.0005812644,0.00002001071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033512097,0.000066193745,0.00011179041,0.00019579392,0.00008401036,0.00022383865,0.00023155469,0.000036031728,0.000088490015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015755522,0.00006297844,0.000057619804,0.00031709546,0.000020766029,0.0026927672,0.00007010866,0.00017685672,0.000022332812],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062664294,0.00040781902,0.05330504,0.00007812905,0.00043424853,0.00071699603,0.0107653495,0.00037025733,0.45678067,0.38399354,0.014341211,0.07874406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019329957,0.00027487858,0.011395145,0.0001512613,0.000027850729,0.0012818469,0.0038683957,0.0018961853,0.9064123,0.05285603,0.019639667,0.00026345492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000062812987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005363977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4496316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011180872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007636685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25681862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205881137","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2021-0047","title":"“Bouncing ideas” as a complex information practice: information seeking, sharing, creation, and cooperation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Information seeking; Knowledge management; Computer science; Metaphor; Sociology; Information science; Information needs; Component (thermodynamics); Information mapping; Information system; Coding (social sciences); Work (physics); Data science; Qualitative research; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Management information systems; Personal information management; Social science","score_opus":0.014095837705976876,"score_gpt":0.32216829974470584,"score_spread":0.30807246203872896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205881137","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08871869,0.00007255249,0.90125287,0.004644854,0.00037132856,0.00024323669,0.0000032870967,0.00004389821,0.0046492806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9546244,0.00019919299,0.040518463,0.004277718,0.00008976711,0.0000073657534,0.00013711567,0.000004416848,0.00014153626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809796,0.00008281236,0.000860538,0.00007061791,0.0007526936,0.0001353584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617314,0.00007735259,0.00091001164,0.0001416412,0.0025974482,0.000100396894],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010141925,0.00009990242,0.00013470346,0.0002854411,0.000241912,0.0019018522,0.000192418,0.000054477983,0.000096888834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008267025,0.00009344166,0.00004524612,0.00045250368,0.000020944764,0.043848608,0.00009494739,0.0001693835,0.000077081524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002822448,0.00018234926,0.004190768,0.00024333,0.00016210123,0.000041458174,0.04805951,0.003953886,0.0071051517,0.6141408,0.007887872,0.3137505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011901987,0.0021114293,0.095052466,0.00046678144,0.00031246376,0.0074876035,0.021027653,0.30768928,0.024354266,0.02107292,0.5072069,0.0013162589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038244656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000023955747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86590576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018136067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033696915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99913424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206912697","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2020-0194","title":"Spatial thinking, gender and immaterial affective labour in the post-Fordist academic library","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Fordism; Originality; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Service (business); Function (biology); Knowledge economy; Social science; Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.01615066971383596,"score_gpt":0.3219319764758128,"score_spread":0.30578130676197685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206912697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98910844,0.00011041448,0.000059146758,0.0073438203,0.0003590583,0.00007942477,0.0000026951184,0.0000042269285,0.0029327467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977681,0.00022581698,0.00022840488,0.0010505705,0.00055356,0.0000011025485,0.0000066683797,0.0000024318545,0.00016334855],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989767,0.00032534698,0.00019579205,0.00006733752,0.00034021775,0.000094607676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996327,0.000084003055,0.000177485,0.00003107097,0.000038382273,0.00003632765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061581173,0.00004167818,0.0000650886,0.000048264777,0.00018714374,0.00037606974,0.00013464449,0.00004550152,0.00027346888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007668474,0.000029590166,0.000026393911,0.00017681773,0.00006198372,0.0038025745,0.000017776261,0.00013803551,0.0000024441122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032882125,0.00016054338,0.42245024,0.00004020255,0.00004289809,0.0002530124,0.336583,0.000027223634,0.022230124,0.19618663,0.0026633027,0.019034017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077579217,0.0001884998,0.8419771,0.000037895188,0.000018084722,0.000057403686,0.081941105,0.000007666607,0.00727088,0.06329477,0.004326793,0.000104008315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001354488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010116263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41952688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019441091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003094174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3626449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217700596","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0117","title":"Versioning boundary objects: the citation profile of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Object (grammar); Originality; Software versioning; Boundary object; Citation; Boundary (topology); Data science; Discipline; Information retrieval; Scheme (mathematics); Mental mapping; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Social science; Mathematics; Software","score_opus":0.18428457107534696,"score_gpt":0.5296834151563714,"score_spread":0.34539884408102445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217700596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9767692,0.0009119154,0.01736591,0.0035289119,0.0007985188,0.00032400177,0.000059109712,0.0000017420621,0.00024070042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967034,0.00028285876,0.0026879366,0.00008043742,0.000043505406,0.0000047366707,0.0000051099864,0.0000044280678,0.00018761063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613476,0.00024982973,0.0005187004,0.00013273381,0.0028294527,0.00013452758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887762,0.009360838,0.0004740436,0.00012260178,0.0011992308,0.00006710677],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005235378,0.000053871277,0.00012284478,0.0020987205,0.0003041902,0.0007607198,0.0003530896,0.00002592419,0.00013941666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027123872,0.00002747434,0.00008165701,0.010111588,0.00014641191,0.0005892579,0.00013055153,0.00011789045,0.000003120972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003894708,0.00046381596,0.27876437,0.00007423631,0.00017035926,0.000012202847,0.008104765,0.0003967114,0.010659187,0.0062230295,0.06897607,0.6257658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029012437,0.0008757358,0.86063486,0.000074672986,0.000086731074,0.000062566454,0.032787733,0.005389035,0.0100447,0.07767632,0.009319816,0.00014657743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011273364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001836978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62561923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006891928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022181556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98107105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213032464","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2021-0168","title":"A qualitative study of social sciences faculty research workflows","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workflow; Qualitative research; Workaround; Knowledge management; Affordance; Coding (social sciences); Descriptive statistics; Scholarly communication; Process (computing); Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.6414632590983634,"score_gpt":0.6612232504779997,"score_spread":0.019759991379636244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213032464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960297,0.000018811039,0.0006816647,0.0010891982,0.0005656326,0.00017425884,0.0000101279775,0.0000030034405,0.0014276531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982822,4.4994547e-7,0.0007580028,0.000027645954,0.00005993891,0.000004901059,0.000002171931,0.0000021453925,0.0008625334],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896392,0.0027219772,0.0009818532,0.0002603941,0.006234607,0.00016194944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687135,0.001229207,0.00094824814,0.0001721213,0.0007462995,0.000032800188],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051366333,0.00005198026,0.00018690366,0.0010057492,0.0010568353,0.00039821866,0.001090363,0.000008230964,0.0007410716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013511592,0.0000380481,0.00007541034,0.0030163515,0.00014812767,0.0006368229,0.0005120137,0.00021605972,0.000014975146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024992492,0.0014380073,0.0032187228,0.0000043232994,0.00007699792,0.00001826676,0.72784376,0.008694835,0.00035993019,0.0037712464,0.2015227,0.052801304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079448865,0.0013569888,0.0063515706,0.0000041246863,0.000011307314,0.0000043554924,0.9679022,0.00044038307,0.000038421927,0.01644957,0.006599466,0.000047135636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068508736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017077813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24005844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011300457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011974127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97681797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213386585","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2021-0084","title":"Embracing theories of precarity for the study of information practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Precarity; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Originality; Value (mathematics); Social science; Gender studies; Qualitative research; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.038514716027277594,"score_gpt":0.3938701684478791,"score_spread":0.3553554524206015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213386585","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953368,0.000027576689,0.00067607063,0.0015775048,0.00038120884,0.00035907913,0.0000035043615,0.0000019425327,0.001636334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959904,0.000011415302,0.00022353252,0.000038533843,0.00006767505,0.000007742472,0.0000014527793,7.571181e-7,0.00004983949],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894494,0.00019243793,0.00032420826,0.000023468965,0.0004710528,0.000043902415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760073,0.00038570253,0.0018175354,0.000038025686,0.00014516119,0.000012825965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020591766,0.000022321205,0.000059906917,0.00005663171,0.00039701743,0.000072801784,0.00015912105,0.000007486836,0.000062722735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039874317,0.000015746276,0.000031337673,0.00020145348,0.000042476717,0.0047688466,0.000015584485,0.000052782278,1.151775e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009603799,0.000651942,0.044627853,0.000056093897,0.00012542207,4.5626322e-7,0.7724029,0.0061404374,0.0019912974,0.14224105,0.0009344906,0.02986768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006993548,0.0017655219,0.022383273,0.000007711411,0.00007258023,0.0000018962372,0.94052285,0.000103805294,0.002329722,0.026627317,0.005444568,0.000041375864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003151557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009882192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16811998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024475115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020988683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34572986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281992621","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2021-0233","title":"Questioning the role of information poverty in immigrant employment acquisition: empirical evidence from African immigrants in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Poverty; Information seeking; Originality; Refugee; Sociology; Information needs; Qualitative research; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.020113856843537347,"score_gpt":0.30072071697358554,"score_spread":0.2806068601300482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281992621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934137,0.00014411597,0.00004014173,0.005979103,0.00015213733,0.00013186138,0.0000086270375,0.0000015846864,0.00012873985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99928486,0.00005858682,0.00012189873,0.00047130857,0.000040807015,0.000006681424,0.0000068148292,0.0000012204157,0.000007797599],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818414,0.0003433315,0.000496423,0.000053078442,0.0008156713,0.00010733785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921674,0.00018882184,0.0004565216,0.000049523213,0.00005066271,0.000037739417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009656272,0.00004314872,0.000091888156,0.00010525437,0.00017991949,0.00006706925,0.0002144892,0.000012383794,0.00023692747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092145434,0.000034335608,0.000028349308,0.0004914766,0.00002921868,0.003082486,0.000022789587,0.00012903467,6.756631e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011159669,0.000032887958,0.94250065,0.0000013898658,0.000005570601,0.0000040162877,0.0467389,0.003589549,0.00040053698,0.0002512657,0.0003521768,0.006011455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029763347,0.00010730069,0.8707222,0.000052149426,0.0000064161322,0.0000028689292,0.124288455,0.0003446793,0.0007465889,0.0026353227,0.00074298866,0.00005340824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9111868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7701304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14105639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007321898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016315392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28942806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307169356","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2022-0090","title":"The colonization of Wikipedia: evidence from characteristic editing behaviors of warring camps","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Reading (process); Peer production; Computer science; Public relations; Data science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018939913313964815,"score_gpt":0.3570195865142398,"score_spread":0.338079673200275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307169356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960171,0.0002049047,0.00036747527,0.001589583,0.0016075308,0.00011244791,0.0000059211748,0.0000030205674,0.00009203232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895024,0.00024069863,0.00026923066,0.000024690877,0.00041317302,0.000008276207,0.0000059546765,0.000003429818,0.000084316634],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851733,0.00031578323,0.00045201383,0.00004794995,0.0006004048,0.0000665297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978757,0.00033915412,0.001249378,0.00005471738,0.00045413163,0.000026918613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012429577,0.000034665387,0.00008543565,0.00006433146,0.00045787386,0.000051124032,0.00016009093,0.000017453545,0.00024362738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006924301,0.0000311207,0.000030759005,0.00033898678,0.00006281989,0.00059083046,0.000018472629,0.00009433171,5.725495e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039889888,0.0004414307,0.43358836,0.000046001453,0.00011631865,0.000005216815,0.3810865,0.0035784715,0.11830555,0.0073885275,0.0050556115,0.049989123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012240548,0.0008408743,0.3952077,0.00035625344,0.0003957511,0.0000071652344,0.55715543,0.00029401577,0.027737228,0.004775011,0.011731957,0.00027453012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051368464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002152065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17606893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021324413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034676158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35216418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386328151","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2023-0070","title":"Does a name make a difference? The neo-documentalist movement, where does it stand after 27 years 1996–2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Web Data Mining and Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Fordham University","keywords":"Documentation; Originality; Value (mathematics); Object (grammar); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Movement (music); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Library science; Social science; Linguistics; Computer science; Qualitative research; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.010093619589559627,"score_gpt":0.27342350706276936,"score_spread":0.26332988747320973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386328151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97584844,0.00033174557,0.0069632703,0.015006622,0.0014135765,0.00016524001,0.000054377513,0.0000547501,0.00016196462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848763,0.0010101298,0.0020876483,0.00083450315,0.00031129882,0.000017880076,0.000016703358,0.000015252483,0.010830297],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981864,0.00013367533,0.0005205074,0.00022072221,0.0006969477,0.00024173333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989202,0.000112955444,0.00044614827,0.00034509448,0.00008622155,0.000089397945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006836856,0.00014173955,0.00020928697,0.00022874257,0.00012183394,0.0008778705,0.0007008687,0.000035998302,0.00023215458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032064647,0.00006805593,0.00015776874,0.00059120025,0.000049516977,0.00095193286,0.00019452689,0.00017246872,0.00008854085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005242627,0.0007086707,0.23219357,0.00038592517,0.0029076396,0.0020249765,0.06202037,0.0010819192,0.015818587,0.005056775,0.15063317,0.5266441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008014683,0.0013294701,0.65570027,0.0018178201,0.0010268725,0.00014956956,0.047559924,0.015863039,0.0055199587,0.06390681,0.19713135,0.0019802174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016273085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036645852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5246639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009358632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006563738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8465325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387704100","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2023-0113","title":"Exploring international collaboration and language dynamics in Digital Humanities: insights from co-authorship networks in canonical journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Centrality; Originality; Library science; Sociology; Multilingualism; Publishing; Social science; Value (mathematics); Humanities; Regional science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.554330087267495,"score_gpt":0.5669016626813276,"score_spread":0.01257157541383258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387704100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99685395,0.00031331799,0.0009212173,0.00055800856,0.0006171354,0.00008020027,0.00001938094,0.0000044059334,0.0006323765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99853474,0.0009792472,0.00011109369,0.000032858847,0.00017163638,0.000003499935,0.00002699791,0.0000058703176,0.00013403522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954612,0.00014717862,0.0009782709,0.00018290644,0.0030432006,0.00018722382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965035,0.002012607,0.0004683349,0.00009328621,0.0008047213,0.00011758749],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005215735,0.00007689741,0.0002028429,0.026406161,0.000060309998,0.0036074484,0.00047843787,0.000058841564,0.00009400203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006338662,0.000060724065,0.000043453994,0.029515218,0.000040087813,0.004736879,0.00010535635,0.00032509043,0.000015221601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019638037,0.0001447967,0.8626819,0.000004035611,0.000039149032,0.00042238703,0.013543134,0.010159127,0.00069209037,0.0016568038,0.001119343,0.10934084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001693838,0.00015721147,0.83297217,0.000091605514,0.0000041900844,0.000015398688,0.059371497,0.09040766,0.00016174519,0.014560607,0.0004207076,0.00014336416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012725455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087178976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109197475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005490333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011800554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388780016","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2022-0254","title":"Advocating for a more active role for the user in LIS participatory research: a scoping literature review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Knowledge management; Participant observation; Computer science; Participatory design; Information science; Participatory action research; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Engineering ethics; World Wide Web; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2505402611690001,"score_gpt":0.5341404453162293,"score_spread":0.2836001841472292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388780016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7768249,0.019539583,0.00085667707,0.19458076,0.0009577146,0.0062702196,0.000023869172,0.000040940326,0.0009053531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97803587,0.016637078,0.0013038351,0.0017332431,0.0009519463,0.00037239338,0.000017951936,0.000011047863,0.00093666767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989555,0.00018939118,0.0002490429,0.000070335045,0.00035922608,0.00017650783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986913,0.00080660795,0.00019024836,0.00004479285,0.00022538558,0.000041643525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003907225,0.000034109642,0.000080058366,0.00010787381,0.0003718712,0.0001960572,0.00015267295,0.00002576728,0.000014778511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011892403,0.000023430814,0.00005506888,0.0008039554,0.000063477295,0.0020397655,0.000010085156,0.0001057021,0.0000018207487],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005753997,0.00019884443,0.010417264,0.0029822784,0.00009912146,0.000024326824,0.6474703,0.00062181434,0.005571731,0.028263312,0.07233214,0.23144346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038416074,0.0018154061,0.040550154,0.0651887,0.00017778012,0.000011567937,0.65363157,0.0033844358,0.009581219,0.064411215,0.15683605,0.0005703204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027110702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015774202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23087315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056625875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037305412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28601703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390273818","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2023-0082","title":"“They act like we are going to heaven”: pre-arrival information experiences, information crafting and settlement of immigrants in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Settlement (finance); Government (linguistics); Heaven; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Business; Law; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.012485824160916857,"score_gpt":0.2932759951543559,"score_spread":0.280790170993439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390273818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962543,0.000009235264,0.00008801777,0.0029553233,0.00029104194,0.00016903137,0.0000065598556,0.0000051187008,0.00022134824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993337,0.000092815266,0.00025089597,0.00024480504,0.00003748627,0.000005442106,0.0000097835355,0.000001253352,0.000023857849],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861044,0.00006578919,0.0005494288,0.00004101247,0.0005931903,0.00014015942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992195,0.000054981607,0.00052373536,0.00003539764,0.00008249252,0.0000839438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007426451,0.00005162257,0.0000982943,0.00023424948,0.00012916338,0.00015064352,0.000107395834,0.000021039436,0.000028522461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001270663,0.00004764486,0.000018121103,0.0004260033,0.000018680601,0.008324467,0.000017922854,0.00005736832,0.000004564298],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010036416,0.000014777571,0.30844593,0.000071384624,0.000011061903,0.0000040836794,0.63367885,0.002712518,0.00041165028,0.00024710677,0.003444597,0.050857652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005843719,0.00017710027,0.40054294,0.00026148144,0.0000067369438,0.0000033772571,0.5869379,0.00065089844,0.0016549322,0.00030311054,0.00875101,0.00012616884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122130625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33488548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21275485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021738683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008042883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88371515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391490528","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2023-0217","title":"Dancing with the devil: the use and perceptions of academic journal ranking lists in the management field","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Originality; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Perception; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Library science; Citation; Information retrieval; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.016926138961503672,"score_gpt":0.2671337750561174,"score_spread":0.2502076360946137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391490528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9615118,0.0013442251,0.008776056,0.027019983,0.000250795,0.00027572436,2.4976637e-7,0.000007417159,0.00081373606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965067,0.0008510417,0.0002447313,0.0017980392,0.00048713517,0.0000032544676,9.720513e-7,0.000007126737,0.0001010076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991593,0.000030047846,0.00029199332,0.00005976075,0.00037234486,0.000086586224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994013,0.00018975188,0.00026031007,0.000054921904,0.000090101,0.0000036704323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009771836,0.00007437872,0.000082692364,0.00017245194,0.00026946294,0.0006759495,0.00019905553,0.00001572322,0.00006760364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037731566,0.00003200314,0.00003697064,0.00042964568,0.000037791295,0.0015950484,0.00006328155,0.0002594798,0.000002670806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004046592,0.00014127669,0.52809894,0.001537214,0.0015446489,0.00022137296,0.031849287,0.006449041,0.00070125517,0.18365097,0.15367243,0.09172892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015757928,0.00009784957,0.8419608,0.0014454318,0.0012644125,0.00016922112,0.052451942,0.0022025856,0.000033025644,0.018123899,0.0804187,0.00025637075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029473513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006985773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31386185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023498911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006735994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65181965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393225472","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2023-0200","title":"Contested imaginaries: workfinding information practices of STEM-trained immigrant women in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Sociology; Gender studies; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023948571984530473,"score_gpt":0.37060235692244553,"score_spread":0.34665378493791504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393225472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934593,0.00029212548,0.000055401917,0.0038750211,0.00069203175,0.00011397029,0.000003728777,0.000003696115,0.0015047231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994313,0.00010226757,0.00005508608,0.000089969755,0.0001272195,0.000004889068,0.0000018029909,0.0000023769085,0.00018506547],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998764,0.00014915304,0.0005629978,0.00003270025,0.00035959127,0.00013155366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852103,0.00029203555,0.000916481,0.000031929027,0.00017477572,0.000063755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015251344,0.000042720156,0.000120612676,0.00021933654,0.000052980824,0.00017497451,0.00007913089,0.0000195953,0.000099612975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020742853,0.000037579823,0.000023096565,0.00040019155,0.000023286906,0.002667683,0.0000036707777,0.00009093584,0.0000028200197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008175243,0.000031029685,0.095151864,0.00023347462,0.000088451845,0.00001348425,0.8592626,0.00014226041,0.00084201526,0.012403357,0.0035064896,0.02824323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005010751,0.00006806409,0.023230769,0.00044052987,0.000018084467,0.000015829663,0.9154247,0.00004214836,0.00025330734,0.00069852156,0.05921644,0.00009050554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79874474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4823495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31639525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012503298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035024225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6213147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394821178","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2023-0090","title":"APRD: action partnership research design: reimagining the role of the user in library and information science research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Knowledge Management and Technology","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; General partnership; Originality; Premise; Participatory design; Action research; Research design; Sociology; Knowledge management; Citizen journalism; Design science research; Public relations; Computer science; Qualitative research; Information system; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.3041508297606987,"score_gpt":0.5252900106402658,"score_spread":0.22113918087956713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394821178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9391653,0.0010288012,0.0015501071,0.032787878,0.0005892007,0.00055416435,4.497382e-7,0.000017124059,0.024306964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987762,0.00020491103,0.00030097654,0.000023446471,0.00005117595,0.00000502107,1.3407715e-7,0.0000026684422,0.000635446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966873,0.00073091907,0.0004922562,0.00010429178,0.0018173382,0.00016789763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976615,0.0016038402,0.00017315772,0.00018556809,0.0003505445,0.000025428268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01965941,0.000039648803,0.000075446944,0.0020011745,0.00024042543,0.0009867073,0.0007193857,0.000032236112,0.00006002754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017308331,0.000018264516,0.000027029317,0.0045475564,0.0005179857,0.012650344,0.00028608553,0.00056985393,0.000022621218],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015423157,0.00003057949,0.036346313,0.00002629073,0.000014493221,0.000003884248,0.009775635,0.00021380707,0.00906679,0.25589058,0.005843927,0.68263346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049155974,0.00032799924,0.0804144,0.00026768752,0.0000131585475,0.000032642794,0.059430942,0.013386532,0.07033951,0.5854342,0.18977615,0.00008523412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000064499372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003881668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6825482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053899115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024117307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9514841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399207205","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2023-0103","title":"When words are key: negotiating meaning in information research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Key (lock); Negotiation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Sociology; World Wide Web; Linguistics; Data science; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05818480045530792,"score_gpt":0.44035677517288124,"score_spread":0.3821719747175733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399207205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78969556,0.00083897216,0.03671513,0.014580187,0.0061267857,0.001290032,0.00001515049,0.00010152522,0.15063666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850285,0.00010158396,0.00068567647,0.000066282126,0.0003736376,0.0000064877904,0.0000071631366,0.0000038721378,0.0002524579],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978736,0.00034256812,0.00069938594,0.000039757724,0.0008635228,0.00018113811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893486,0.00020303483,0.00035303523,0.00003806558,0.00042566005,0.000045312652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005842726,0.00004685212,0.00009054278,0.00062816334,0.00026284394,0.0010152769,0.00010427594,0.000042465766,0.00026658073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035387397,0.000043277458,0.000035329223,0.00054929144,0.00003603024,0.008188023,0.000014826804,0.00021721481,0.000054187512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000370674,0.000009934563,0.0037953977,0.00010139469,0.000022714847,0.0000049574974,0.6473271,0.0008154688,0.00006574203,0.29225922,0.010049226,0.04551176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000503077,0.00008840272,0.0019910252,0.0004244577,0.0000082868455,0.000008336368,0.66326904,0.0011450617,0.00009356351,0.021001188,0.31137434,0.00009323677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091766624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024988237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3013251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005199201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021338474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9790338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400921956","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2024-0037","title":"Provenance and historical warrants: histories of cataloguing at the Museum of Anthropology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal British Columbia Museum; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Provenance; Anthropology; History; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.02793281307475942,"score_gpt":0.26218902919717063,"score_spread":0.2342562161224112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400921956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97453046,0.014504415,0.000045048477,0.0064603826,0.002403082,0.000102766695,0.000016480028,0.0000075115095,0.0019298497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99720013,0.0002889822,0.000038689064,0.000021919557,0.00017926634,0.0000010944295,0.0000020711625,0.000004372418,0.0022634694],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945045,0.000023478677,0.00030432027,0.00004726933,0.00012228907,0.00005219014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995915,0.00004193619,0.00022560138,0.000039782302,0.000086889,0.000014266045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001261782,0.000047947535,0.00012855549,0.00003562666,0.00008198753,0.00002739552,0.0000475083,0.00001567832,0.00052191044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014327069,0.000026623773,0.00004912082,0.000020433179,0.00017773944,0.00033375836,0.000013474401,0.00006290352,8.8125717e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029482294,0.00014980909,0.00091424433,0.0011129945,0.0002849581,0.000041093324,0.5176655,0.000012246349,0.04610766,0.3375275,0.07346012,0.02242903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041859967,0.00065589807,0.0005057929,0.00020351907,0.0001192285,0.00008022805,0.02085865,0.000022316288,0.0045499713,0.002312806,0.9701714,0.00010158724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032610135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039751024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8967113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014557794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019041907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5714553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407856370","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2024-0215","title":"Preprint servers and journals: rivals or allies?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Preprint; Server; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.10659813698551751,"score_gpt":0.5003400696613653,"score_spread":0.39374193267584784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407856370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9715736,0.0006274811,0.010375778,0.0127085,0.0007015795,0.00010390275,0.0000014128725,0.000006013741,0.0039017547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918016,0.00048720773,0.001808869,0.0009339212,0.00008861808,0.0000011577289,2.729905e-7,0.0000031465158,0.0048751934],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740565,0.00023986583,0.0010207057,0.00014969187,0.0010718614,0.00011220259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997343,0.000867826,0.0010241003,0.00014299047,0.0005249165,0.00009713836],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074449806,0.00007401138,0.0002297034,0.00045120547,0.000118690805,0.0020969762,0.0008076171,0.00006548202,0.00064474205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005697827,0.000044321107,0.000071950926,0.0005853,0.000041125517,0.00469089,0.00015133039,0.00030052618,0.000015384972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060633867,0.000081116756,0.28068396,0.000020940975,0.00019762717,0.000038856106,0.0029720808,0.001310394,0.0019767396,0.0027322017,0.22314185,0.48623788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034822328,0.0002626388,0.5739934,0.00056271715,0.00012459866,0.0003315409,0.016829079,0.00077356957,0.007934207,0.2865665,0.10887138,0.00026813493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024251836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012173941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48596975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072616014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016845418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408209208","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2024-0167","title":"Knowledge translation as an interdisciplinary method for information science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Interoperability; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Originality; Data science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.035433540345556125,"score_gpt":0.44049514801569456,"score_spread":0.40506160767013843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408209208","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02575479,0.00007545805,0.9684014,0.0015929892,0.000710438,0.00013652269,2.779255e-7,0.000017890974,0.00331029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65665424,0.000009300483,0.34311792,0.0001477551,0.000033699678,0.0000045430534,0.000001417078,0.000001051757,0.000030091118],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992509,0.00004382695,0.0003509968,0.000078327226,0.00018059842,0.000095382784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990896,0.00015341569,0.00023269444,0.00010996692,0.00038040994,0.00003393844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012475208,0.000052896685,0.00009390084,0.0005053316,0.00017260834,0.0003193079,0.00044286653,0.000025232737,0.0000026420498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000095852665,0.000043567452,0.000049360042,0.00048221176,0.000031923966,0.009214001,0.000056729663,0.000052928506,0.000003875898],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058732618,0.000045619418,0.000085852465,0.00003254828,0.000013225205,4.50728e-7,0.009786549,0.0002453146,0.0043325825,0.11962048,0.0002789559,0.8654997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004244484,0.0020841593,0.020856813,0.000275435,0.00010984798,0.00013213199,0.010564702,0.367684,0.11056948,0.47388348,0.009261429,0.00033403237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004495676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000054561083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86516565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008154015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66799283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410265558","doi":"10.1108/jd-01-2025-0009","title":"Navigating accountability: the role of paradata in AI documentation and governance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Documentation; Corporate governance; Computer science; Business; Knowledge management; Accounting; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.015229457004781434,"score_gpt":0.4197074774598421,"score_spread":0.40447802045506065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410265558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97660136,0.0008239837,0.00006197104,0.019775316,0.00014212307,0.00013098562,0.000002351015,0.0000020079726,0.0024598928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808323,0.0011251859,0.00020247397,0.0004970824,0.000054914723,0.0000014048653,8.6838304e-7,0.0000019038047,0.00003293916],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989624,0.00018915768,0.00035432822,0.000055954097,0.00034829552,0.00008985082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989927,0.00031671237,0.0004055037,0.000053219483,0.00020812517,0.00002375645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001947828,0.00004214646,0.00010809717,0.000019974876,0.00017155118,0.00018417997,0.00013482787,0.00004672004,0.00002689065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005468772,0.00003326383,0.000030216564,0.00022757526,0.00014330389,0.0017056239,0.000021447413,0.00025665504,3.3048568e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013733846,0.00013784475,0.32721278,0.000057157795,0.00007970285,0.0000020700295,0.15047131,0.00012232715,0.0046879486,0.24001147,0.00043910526,0.27664092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001414706,0.00013744875,0.25100914,0.00063406094,0.00007781506,0.0000018222787,0.17362294,0.000118979,0.0053646904,0.5593312,0.008148337,0.00013891142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063129724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028744016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3193197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013556377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018587304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9543368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414713296","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2025-0129","title":"Information retrieval of humanities resources: subject searching from a user perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Usability; Exploratory search; Cultural heritage; Key (lock); Visibility; Subject access; Information system; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.014004928891972836,"score_gpt":0.2955831358688536,"score_spread":0.28157820697688074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414713296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84413105,0.00021724854,0.1518742,0.0006980199,0.00026608224,0.00006252997,0.0000012679598,0.000013312815,0.0027362935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910218,0.00003205946,0.008664317,0.00016193428,0.000038396764,3.5438234e-7,9.054264e-7,0.0000011793446,0.000079028316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914986,0.00008170227,0.00035447348,0.00004470164,0.00029747377,0.000071800125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998981,0.00020013483,0.00037257056,0.000100551464,0.0003327148,0.00001301702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036822652,0.000051067702,0.00012601259,0.00029602493,0.000060188086,0.00019953532,0.00029430032,0.00002530631,0.000012552583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020405308,0.000042230236,0.00005892832,0.00021050943,0.000030934207,0.0024505137,0.000055699325,0.00010446038,0.0000023772222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010190373,0.00019093479,0.029169098,0.00016717624,0.0007060338,0.000022570377,0.37599635,0.001212607,0.013936797,0.54353374,0.004103398,0.029942261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049853814,0.0011605084,0.36751094,0.00088914426,0.00017816729,0.000040669904,0.21506163,0.0045523946,0.11176304,0.28813496,0.0053473194,0.0003758358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003178567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001656377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33834183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010844787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091049886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19241238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415143794","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2025-0160","title":"Exploring the contemplative landscape of Library and Information Science through the lens of Chinese philosophies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Spirituality; Holism; Chinese philosophy; Foundation (evidence); Conceptual framework; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.04942873472302538,"score_gpt":0.32054132767126026,"score_spread":0.27111259294823487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415143794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94321084,0.0002749653,0.000048435162,0.010685911,0.00038788497,0.00010353658,0.0000024289675,0.0000029354612,0.04528307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916464,0.00044175153,0.000068885645,0.00019203669,0.000112736234,0.0000017527274,5.48499e-7,9.94571e-7,0.000016634593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929494,0.00008623807,0.00027726454,0.000029438103,0.0002700089,0.000042089643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991902,0.00024205365,0.00039225115,0.000052808402,0.00011111337,0.000011579287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049119396,0.00003958154,0.00009164762,0.00012606957,0.0003527608,0.00005004545,0.00016656973,0.000010784125,0.000008896571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015413915,0.000020642396,0.000035476653,0.0005922851,0.00048061454,0.012392255,0.000026731132,0.000074688425,2.60692e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014777589,0.000021711567,0.012461555,0.000037359165,0.000035032706,2.0185533e-7,0.20681544,0.00013682623,0.00067090313,0.77830565,0.0001032128,0.001264335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010512117,0.00019876134,0.15089224,0.000212103,0.000062779116,0.0000036620647,0.029319333,0.000030907147,0.0022390129,0.80449927,0.011394811,0.000095877156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031472835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052513374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17749609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012785395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013025876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89840853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415932926","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2025-0106","title":"Annexing and dissolving countries with documents: comparing and analysing the accession of East Germany into Germany and potential annexation of Canada into the USA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"German History and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Annexation; Parallels; Documentation; Accession; Principal (computer security)","score_opus":0.007721972969377497,"score_gpt":0.24077995248442502,"score_spread":0.23305797951504753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415932926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99780303,0.0008748376,0.00024119648,0.00059097755,0.00010743807,0.000074388496,9.737225e-7,0.0000013404594,0.00030580425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995039,0.00014306518,0.00005766415,0.00008858265,0.0000509222,0.0000010132255,0.000001357394,0.0000031840912,0.00015030701],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992488,0.000071490555,0.0003399408,0.00006796102,0.000202488,0.00006934329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990407,0.000068181944,0.000634349,0.000055575958,0.0001784964,0.000022651893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036873296,0.000075656564,0.00016367006,0.00006570567,0.00061485055,0.00017723332,0.000069166774,0.000014877978,0.00002428786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012798571,0.00004353352,0.000023255128,0.000045516743,0.00023663206,0.00078260346,0.000036473746,0.00009387563,2.4726653e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007458633,0.00008652105,0.18877858,0.0011395967,0.0010238799,0.000012974728,0.7488249,0.0020196096,0.013046885,0.03453856,0.0015416105,0.008241015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035781336,0.00038895634,0.71485984,0.0019132748,0.0013912276,0.000048757076,0.25402692,0.0070295087,0.002776294,0.0060542068,0.007499102,0.00043379498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019144624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07231894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5260812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066290486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008110376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.987387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116891643","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2025-0148","title":"Interdependence in information practices: differences matter when caring for immigration data in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Government (linguistics); CLARITY; Settlement (finance); Thematic analysis; Sociotechnical system; Work (physics); Service (business); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.027202349365637465,"score_gpt":0.35589870828144743,"score_spread":0.32869635891580995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116891643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97637415,0.00009834229,0.016402043,0.0044912323,0.0006494861,0.00039078904,0.000009745524,0.0000030369165,0.0015811985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834716,0.00015581494,0.00087275566,0.00032209573,0.00006116235,0.000011227538,0.000051312,0.0000016380665,0.00017683154],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875104,0.00013962488,0.0006048563,0.00007914849,0.00031714904,0.00010815523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986771,0.00018756895,0.00081395963,0.000090764835,0.00020757342,0.000023045372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010420884,0.000058349222,0.00011623179,0.00025902758,0.000084654814,0.00019838556,0.00025722606,0.000038844148,0.00008064329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060930615,0.000052323998,0.000017199778,0.0001949496,0.000014191163,0.006225708,0.000017793966,0.00011413567,0.0000016591225],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019088174,0.00004904858,0.89388835,0.000087999775,0.000028143148,0.0000012025696,0.058079507,0.00021940173,0.00028250786,0.0049961293,0.012430359,0.02974644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024219532,0.0001411902,0.7106937,0.000897922,0.00007994987,0.0000036778458,0.21847455,0.009735886,0.00089802826,0.015020504,0.04131118,0.00032142756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8109459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18319464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083662686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014516355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45134878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}