{"meta":{"query_hash":"57893008c7c3","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Documentation"},"cohort_total":103,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":103,"exported":103,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/57893008c7c3","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Documentation"},"results":[{"id":"W1531228058","doi":"10.1108/00220410710723902","title":"Purls of wisdom","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Collectivism; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Sociology; Naturalistic observation; Value (mathematics); Field (mathematics); Social constructivism; Social psychology; Psychology; Knowledge management; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social science; Individualism","score_opus":0.010825590179941199,"score_gpt":0.32302810294779455,"score_spread":0.3122025127678533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1531228058","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004114078,0.002822774,0.04139793,0.02944335,0.0036781256,0.0009293148,0.00053700974,0.000380895,0.9166965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45593894,0.006477856,0.088923685,0.036964286,0.0045484095,0.0052842996,0.0020186824,0.0016134003,0.39823037],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95872307,0.019084355,0.003128042,0.005723052,0.011250941,0.0020906015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9428683,0.015453874,0.0026575017,0.02174625,0.01460581,0.0026682515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02494546,0.0011058594,0.0015809889,0.0040378687,0.010186447,0.017670393,0.0043112724,0.00445158,0.03789825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07247361,0.00068561255,0.0012393307,0.0030631719,0.02682546,0.016486775,0.012235631,0.008448791,0.022311363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004476152,0.00003530259,0.0006703227,0.00037317726,0.00003290651,0.00027805375,0.013170442,0.00012344964,0.00017557347,0.8945432,0.045140147,0.045412835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002272399,0.00002885002,0.00032221148,0.0009784565,0.000015884883,0.00037011353,0.0067746653,0.000176296,0.00023173972,0.35161996,0.6394355,0.000023574763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025424988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035196403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03789825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061164265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015706208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13192576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1540888225","doi":"10.1108/00220411211277028","title":"Archiving electroacoustic and mixed music","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Music Technology and Sound Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Electroacoustic music; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Relevance (law); Usability; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Originality; Human–computer interaction; Sociology; Visual arts; Art; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.01391372146500788,"score_gpt":0.25713727317494667,"score_spread":0.24322355170993878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1540888225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59017444,0.002888102,0.24627931,0.0021648696,0.00016293029,0.0005720845,0.00017052978,0.0005823701,0.15700534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9272924,0.0008074211,0.061025888,0.00018035201,0.000046351368,0.00012997344,0.00009401934,0.000056576115,0.010367107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965342,0.001316643,0.00029227874,0.0003646863,0.0012789157,0.00021317252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98828787,0.005888616,0.0010991881,0.003090615,0.0013707406,0.00026293562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005365932,0.0004444549,0.0003353685,0.0032144866,0.0019931507,0.0069561764,0.0014818684,0.0010746553,0.0040152255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012676272,0.00026321574,0.00057094905,0.0020561463,0.0039569647,0.005722124,0.0044618538,0.0006936524,0.0009834559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027248432,0.00037583802,0.0291112,0.0015680286,0.000093816416,0.0013481437,0.10466852,0.003340126,0.017925087,0.05890268,0.0022096094,0.78018445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013232137,0.0013127166,0.10603226,0.0042857304,0.0004742141,0.01030385,0.28732598,0.031453747,0.06227451,0.1658266,0.33026147,0.00031660649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001967623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024176915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069561764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014060134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002165081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028378129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550385268","doi":"10.1108/jd-01-2014-0018","title":"Social semiotics as theory and practice in library and information science","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Multimedia Communication and Technology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Originality; Social semiotics; Computer science; Information science; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Data science; Epistemology; Social science; Qualitative research; Library science","score_opus":0.02474796014636087,"score_gpt":0.40502495637253083,"score_spread":0.38027699622616995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550385268","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04291501,0.04246682,0.23023452,0.10721301,0.0021869184,0.00028952656,0.00014487439,0.00038411457,0.57416517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91842484,0.014917468,0.04319681,0.003577876,0.0011868692,0.0005204749,0.00007908335,0.00017533432,0.017921193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96937513,0.026376015,0.0009103778,0.00094283966,0.001830714,0.0005650123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95957816,0.03322388,0.0017735459,0.0026068515,0.0017449601,0.0010727529],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01956713,0.0008446408,0.0009897428,0.007072299,0.008982653,0.019077757,0.0015295597,0.004214249,0.0053111142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014386697,0.00046978905,0.0007694659,0.006964264,0.08860592,0.013768993,0.0071097594,0.004872677,0.0010560649],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070231235,0.000013272473,0.00018897129,0.000120561126,0.00000444509,0.00006312637,0.013611338,0.00028117435,0.000048818343,0.9786758,0.0009735078,0.006011945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008459533,0.000022915008,0.00022878642,0.00043459324,0.0000049011874,0.0001345651,0.015279063,0.00082042674,0.00018379842,0.9121089,0.07075727,0.000016307142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037354042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026452318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01956713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0119461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0107942065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10348213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967666529","doi":"10.1108/00220411111164664","title":"New labour in libraries: the post‐Fordist public library","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Fordism; Relevance (law); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Austerity; Institution; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Library classification; Meaning (existential); Politics; Political science; Social science; Library science; Economics; Computer science; Epistemology; Economy; Law","score_opus":0.03591734490335279,"score_gpt":0.2681601502433639,"score_spread":0.23224280534001113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967666529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21302526,0.018115075,0.014361434,0.15728003,0.0008314561,0.00010051461,0.00012696971,0.0002291485,0.59593004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93924254,0.0026602934,0.00093666924,0.004955219,0.0004238953,0.00006703238,0.000026308751,0.000051862073,0.05163617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907958,0.0055709668,0.0001952229,0.0007052568,0.0013351947,0.0013976702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904468,0.0056184568,0.0008692472,0.00095130084,0.0012624329,0.00085180136],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008578309,0.00021237665,0.00032757368,0.0026709284,0.01215831,0.018443532,0.0014161553,0.0040083244,0.006637458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008996416,0.00031837053,0.00049542094,0.0031891936,0.03614315,0.009783626,0.0052524945,0.003165377,0.0011058573],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040406194,0.000032724398,0.0018316993,0.00008591092,0.0000031161062,0.00018863929,0.057633378,0.0002820394,0.00010937425,0.91098475,0.00711397,0.021694075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002608312,0.00007626819,0.00683633,0.00043964759,0.000011246887,0.0002847743,0.06842612,0.0010291601,0.00062812446,0.17660283,0.7455746,0.0000648487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08193353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060644016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9815565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05336244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022238955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3871734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973209021","doi":"10.1108/00220411211225575","title":"A review of theoretical models of health information seeking on the web","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":150,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Computer science; Originality; Multidisciplinary approach; Management science; Information seeking; Data science; Data collection; The Internet; Information behavior; Knowledge management; Information retrieval; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.14807134702291977,"score_gpt":0.5300043778624344,"score_spread":0.3819330308395146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973209021","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026016979,0.7936086,0.07612147,0.036960263,0.00122741,0.00035092165,0.00070589746,0.00030338057,0.06470522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2135681,0.7472803,0.02971309,0.0045802617,0.0007552749,0.0007646903,0.0007296316,0.00006686034,0.0025417584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969543,0.0014868655,0.00032577544,0.00028673053,0.00082306704,0.00012331255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97152823,0.024592446,0.0011037211,0.000573682,0.0019240099,0.00027792793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069861948,0.0015333227,0.0014994179,0.011819528,0.0017243837,0.006622789,0.0030832363,0.0021222834,0.0065369667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017427104,0.0010484777,0.0015159552,0.010572369,0.004226503,0.008719421,0.0021483626,0.0032443719,0.0013267075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009679402,0.00040947387,0.00893439,0.025064405,0.0004379797,0.00061911525,0.009578616,0.00572827,0.00042294184,0.50971913,0.016245203,0.4227437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061757564,0.00029180682,0.017394485,0.07199427,0.0008002285,0.0022653048,0.015275859,0.020552332,0.00081515993,0.5717572,0.2985325,0.00025916932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005653166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037157496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011819528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047218725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005928014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036947012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978265849","doi":"10.1108/00220410610688750","title":"Aggregation consistency and frequency of Chinese words and characters","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Zipf's law; Consistency (knowledge bases); Syllable; Romanization; Vernacular; Distribution (mathematics); Frequency distribution; Set (abstract data type); Mathematics; Computer science; Econometrics; Natural language processing; Data set; Statistics; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition","score_opus":0.004694726306288027,"score_gpt":0.2702126740971309,"score_spread":0.26551794779084287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978265849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98463213,0.00028978277,0.007835521,0.00009279475,0.00002643316,0.00008306446,0.0016201119,0.000100091434,0.0053199953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965222,0.0000588211,0.0019479784,0.000014849472,0.000018200062,0.000072650575,0.0011232534,0.0000149090265,0.00022721251],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846631,0.003506273,0.003028985,0.00260495,0.0057525025,0.00044417573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93607134,0.032135487,0.013917564,0.009441185,0.008006214,0.00042820306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008071297,0.0002746798,0.0006870587,0.008721721,0.0009123872,0.0021679045,0.0007415465,0.00030411335,0.0025526287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.062020183,0.00019240574,0.0006233651,0.015455048,0.0015159076,0.0016874068,0.001531154,0.00036498826,0.00039277182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003321465,0.000054240147,0.8967346,0.0005509155,0.00045576814,0.00031733836,0.0056443987,0.0021130012,0.0030433745,0.0046760472,0.0009789879,0.0850992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011835368,0.00010546114,0.9824869,0.00007774704,0.00012201606,0.00035208132,0.0020013591,0.006175267,0.0023736248,0.0037141903,0.0025330982,0.00004640788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040357998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028335722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008721721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013078881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007549166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042685628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978317631","doi":"10.1108/00220410710743306","title":"Machine learning for Asian language text classification","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Text and Document Classification Technologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Text segmentation; Artificial intelligence; Segmentation; Natural language processing; Language model; Support vector machine; Principle of maximum entropy; Market segmentation; Naive Bayes classifier; Word (group theory); Pattern recognition (psychology); Machine learning; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02066179093718157,"score_gpt":0.3197743031696622,"score_spread":0.29911251223248064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978317631","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13571978,0.0058657345,0.8290572,0.002877423,0.0005962008,0.0005887462,0.0018131245,0.00469116,0.018790608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63858616,0.0017292354,0.3508476,0.0004400887,0.00034368815,0.000753201,0.0018926518,0.0002035464,0.005203842],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745816,0.0013481205,0.00020168239,0.00032054735,0.0005481025,0.00012332582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936215,0.003933885,0.0005533403,0.0006129617,0.0011415529,0.00013664953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037232826,0.0007235038,0.00075428025,0.002068666,0.00072889734,0.0016560142,0.0007659927,0.00061673403,0.0044428143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010809655,0.00019731405,0.00070162525,0.0033697565,0.00047326498,0.002435737,0.0007927918,0.0014784505,0.0022371567],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046012175,0.0004213258,0.017260838,0.0006820439,0.00022681143,0.00024929468,0.00030010944,0.061210264,0.0074069663,0.019732272,0.011218546,0.8808314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057788813,0.0003072381,0.008858259,0.00019270378,0.00009288202,0.00025455342,0.0003446789,0.9364767,0.0111186225,0.030410817,0.011824007,0.000061712126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032380386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033076638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044428143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009990775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014820104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019690812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992156462","doi":"10.1108/00220410510578023","title":"“Isms” in information science: constructivism, collectivism and constructionism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":363,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library of Parliament","funders":"","keywords":"Metatheory; Constructionism; Constructivism (international relations); Originality; Strict constructionism; Epistemology; Collectivism; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Objectivism; Sociology; Knowledge management; Social science; Philosophy; Politics; Individualism","score_opus":0.005605229972077005,"score_gpt":0.2681537019985687,"score_spread":0.2625484720264917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992156462","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10271633,0.063220344,0.3615232,0.1698962,0.0012365788,0.00038302128,0.00027269,0.00047580025,0.3002759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94006944,0.010143806,0.041399237,0.003062596,0.00093512726,0.00066129485,0.00012225774,0.00008406916,0.0035221078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734134,0.020806069,0.0010369908,0.001025567,0.003059104,0.00065872376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730312,0.019766403,0.0017042938,0.0033621027,0.0015505302,0.0005854673],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024023112,0.0007274044,0.0009830652,0.0090690395,0.0038836792,0.012527266,0.0015711759,0.0021660114,0.0018297622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01876547,0.00062009244,0.0011080296,0.008326477,0.056821488,0.017785296,0.0049768,0.004577515,0.00028361578],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009195431,0.000014762393,0.0005950002,0.000110566434,0.000014003877,0.000024920082,0.0071350783,0.00023958244,0.000047535756,0.9835597,0.0006263027,0.007623306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008897746,0.000016196189,0.00061365473,0.0002480807,0.0000112123325,0.000049357466,0.003245481,0.00070586713,0.00009775091,0.98203075,0.012963299,0.000009407648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024911526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001603421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99611634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008200582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068646497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1270479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992860209","doi":"10.1108/00220411211277064","title":"Discourse structure differences in lay and professional health communication","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Sentence; Politeness; Pragmatics; Linguistics; Value (mathematics); Discourse analysis; Originality; Psychology; Nursing research; Sociology; Computer science; Qualitative research; Medicine; Nursing; Social science","score_opus":0.05120499320712839,"score_gpt":0.5114823189936186,"score_spread":0.4602773257864902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992860209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9639185,0.0010812844,0.014435719,0.0014132307,0.0000747326,0.0001869401,0.00040233592,0.00007863648,0.01840862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944019,0.00018708406,0.003980861,0.00012749486,0.00003459499,0.0001239769,0.00029666463,0.000035888395,0.00081161514],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98587114,0.009817292,0.00084887794,0.0009259153,0.0022017946,0.00033492132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9154494,0.07016637,0.0068093566,0.001740627,0.005124442,0.00070976134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011165095,0.0002921985,0.00036385222,0.0037105565,0.0015313041,0.0044180593,0.00047017186,0.0008188784,0.0035417024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07238954,0.0002495521,0.00029351076,0.002071151,0.0030400844,0.004014278,0.002554973,0.00092580914,0.0005121832],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068226294,0.00012289631,0.05954736,0.0013642363,0.00007993798,0.00034346894,0.8225163,0.00042457308,0.014463107,0.02404977,0.0012908529,0.075115174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011225291,0.00045957457,0.27830663,0.0019474771,0.00017402825,0.00085094635,0.5952845,0.008301841,0.01182484,0.032392807,0.07016492,0.0001801786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018279639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001333309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011165095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020949685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014972071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0590474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996025826","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000007123","title":"Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Web visibility and informetrics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Semiotics; Reciprocal; Sign (mathematics); Citation; Context (archaeology); Bibliometrics; Citation analysis; Computer science; Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Library science; History; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020804940308397364,"score_gpt":0.3272440855243747,"score_spread":0.3064391452159773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996025826","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.119550936,0.015398133,0.48610905,0.0088998955,0.00085279025,0.00078101025,0.0016881521,0.0015105262,0.3652095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8942238,0.0036591713,0.09239771,0.00039545444,0.0005777356,0.0013361538,0.00066060066,0.00023708344,0.006512245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9058737,0.07243516,0.004405429,0.0025195717,0.013840138,0.0009260694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84635586,0.11984758,0.0131761385,0.009357906,0.010303857,0.00095861644],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034175586,0.0011173716,0.0014315635,0.039571352,0.0025131209,0.014364036,0.0010884062,0.0012025309,0.0050526387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14014615,0.00053030526,0.00073297194,0.032300707,0.019162463,0.010527487,0.005632981,0.0011772638,0.00084405474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006629192,0.000036987978,0.0031093727,0.0008241886,0.00007423195,0.00008263139,0.007869974,0.0021481768,0.0005659063,0.9216002,0.0016899047,0.061932173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021406267,0.000050359762,0.0047917254,0.00046599493,0.00003083881,0.00023193388,0.006526956,0.0058485777,0.00090375205,0.9517061,0.029353872,0.00006842875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011879157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009904546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96042866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005253932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029954282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18073994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996460024","doi":"10.1108/00220410810844178","title":"Understanding the information and communication technology needs of the e‐humanist","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanism; Originality; Computer science; Information and Communications Technology; Interview; Sociology; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Social science; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.0494176736175535,"score_gpt":0.333281641358533,"score_spread":0.2838639677409795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996460024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8233418,0.00487871,0.008309918,0.07273704,0.00019568269,0.0001479634,0.0001542734,0.00012011479,0.09011441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98151994,0.0028326733,0.003841726,0.0035737182,0.000109329485,0.00009241124,0.00008244292,0.000019327159,0.007928497],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910637,0.005401637,0.00029350998,0.00045238953,0.0014610132,0.0013277784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765088,0.014114781,0.0018301359,0.0007444997,0.0026179012,0.0041838605],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069726515,0.00021354378,0.000332564,0.0025085874,0.0046363478,0.008609103,0.001055172,0.0026559264,0.004264424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017027885,0.0002901614,0.00022934616,0.0016703368,0.0054721776,0.0062242853,0.0047552832,0.0016804392,0.0011813428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013999677,0.00041442862,0.059715457,0.0011951947,0.000031764663,0.0021867917,0.7277728,0.0005581445,0.004360656,0.029893762,0.012724516,0.16100645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013941096,0.00026544728,0.022933703,0.00066817936,0.000013205622,0.0013478223,0.81335354,0.0005269728,0.000896753,0.013524821,0.14640579,0.000049820443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004138049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035843858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001972669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058453395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036875367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996460968","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2012-0118","title":"An information meta-state approach to documentation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Media, Communication, and Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Materiality (auditing); Originality; Context (archaeology); Individuation; Epistemology; Computer science; Negotiation; Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Presupposition; Technical documentation; Sociology; Qualitative research; Aesthetics; Psychology; Philosophy; History","score_opus":0.04192473197938581,"score_gpt":0.37829363841278674,"score_spread":0.33636890643340095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996460968","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016352393,0.0053703454,0.687089,0.016222743,0.00047067745,0.00015952306,0.000259686,0.00068199326,0.2733936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7418556,0.0038335721,0.21187231,0.0012041819,0.00050270016,0.00048090413,0.00028667477,0.00031376522,0.03965032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956019,0.0024897568,0.00033595006,0.00044776686,0.000875011,0.00024952277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125963,0.0047026193,0.00048739644,0.0023200198,0.0009455155,0.00028479405],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005729505,0.0005159909,0.0005679108,0.0044752834,0.0043163905,0.013345286,0.002503911,0.0025989185,0.009175724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010177033,0.00060775556,0.0012443194,0.004907326,0.01647101,0.019253189,0.005645213,0.004131134,0.0013658609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000424318,0.0000039486945,0.000040926123,0.000027832482,0.0000021343333,0.000034634584,0.0013305421,0.0003044963,0.0000586827,0.9945786,0.00027650004,0.0033376056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010052176,0.000014923746,0.00008891108,0.0001378476,0.000014425823,0.00015555392,0.0010917926,0.0035334192,0.00049406197,0.943784,0.050659686,0.000015295436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003793452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030922412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9866547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070439233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043435018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051107526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007620454","doi":"10.1108/00220410210441","title":"A proposed ethical warrant for global knowledge representation and organization systems","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Warrant; Hospitality; Declaration; Knowledge management; Information ethics; Representation (politics); Information system; Cultural diversity; Engineering ethics; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Globalization; Public relations; Computer science; Business; Political science; Law; Tourism; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.04247622556466026,"score_gpt":0.3905917446769292,"score_spread":0.34811551911226896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007620454","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03654412,0.0026875555,0.216934,0.31382987,0.0024749383,0.0008375379,0.00012605693,0.0002682461,0.42629775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75382334,0.0012820067,0.18867645,0.019914417,0.0013496893,0.0011617314,0.00013430088,0.00009407975,0.03356401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95258313,0.027793642,0.0032310276,0.00345145,0.010761247,0.0021795225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9510598,0.022476304,0.0045170058,0.007697752,0.011023062,0.0032261347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04668012,0.0006840795,0.0006820526,0.0020398293,0.008482877,0.015265714,0.0021064437,0.011745513,0.0038169918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057996333,0.00058679533,0.0010305415,0.0017110053,0.03552812,0.012934187,0.008103965,0.009086883,0.0008275983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025538934,0.000011536496,0.00010983563,0.000014504726,0.0000013710585,0.00002591635,0.001222552,0.00017389818,0.000039420225,0.9946567,0.0013653929,0.0023763704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031616542,0.00003933797,0.00025548332,0.00020222676,0.0000101809765,0.00016133858,0.0025273212,0.0020995585,0.0002785855,0.90075076,0.093617275,0.00002628646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028225887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002618448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04668012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008822761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027504675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24687105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010476423","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087832","title":"The individual and social dynamics of knowledge sharing: an exploratory study","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Social exchange theory; Situational ethics; Preference; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Population; Psychology; Originality; Social psychology; Microeconomics; Economics; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.048932446630688374,"score_gpt":0.36727879135659247,"score_spread":0.3183463447259041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010476423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99889624,0.000018318542,0.00026256687,0.000034613226,5.458496e-7,0.000034725377,0.000013446467,0.0000014881363,0.00073790655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993975,0.000030401165,0.00029936875,0.000019448731,0.0000013530719,0.00004251333,0.000011774919,0.0000011846118,0.00019648104],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970784,0.0019700404,0.00008783095,0.00020541492,0.0002762015,0.00038206537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98882806,0.008223013,0.0013487296,0.0005005049,0.00038369623,0.00071598426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035504657,0.00020107279,0.00039084,0.0011489618,0.0022727705,0.0021877591,0.00056751986,0.0005760429,0.0017058646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091981515,0.00027679422,0.00020633313,0.0009825316,0.0018139033,0.0019007662,0.0022607334,0.0007103031,0.00016681621],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028343766,0.0029270616,0.516366,0.00020091092,0.000075691605,0.0010509982,0.44185057,0.00044018912,0.0022937057,0.0028607862,0.00028403214,0.031366583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005646685,0.0013368534,0.3827801,0.00010765491,0.000069070455,0.0007610684,0.6010729,0.0042283554,0.0013600935,0.0034739885,0.004691242,0.0000622307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028649347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003956982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035504657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009550329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017676473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018776894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011175967","doi":"10.1108/00220410810867551","title":"Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Computer science; Epistemology; Value (mathematics); Scholarship; Point (geometry); Sociology; Data science; Management science; Social science; Mathematics; Machine learning; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.027149219746073965,"score_gpt":0.3443138993624349,"score_spread":0.3171646796163609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011175967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17286186,0.14170325,0.20300001,0.13140047,0.0032097735,0.0007955403,0.0005138452,0.00028781418,0.3462274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93288153,0.014065141,0.045262367,0.003074932,0.0007243215,0.00059038354,0.000240478,0.000054183172,0.0031067368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93918973,0.045888927,0.0035415401,0.0030641158,0.007166658,0.001148975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88002753,0.08698754,0.011632659,0.011823906,0.007368252,0.0021601154],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040071957,0.00053874275,0.0013107712,0.018917058,0.008605632,0.016940981,0.0019881527,0.0023139513,0.0028286292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05388379,0.00038438276,0.0007256818,0.026913922,0.05182801,0.022012612,0.007403031,0.003030535,0.0004148119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014980485,0.000032225456,0.0031147662,0.0005012181,0.000029609977,0.00008021623,0.025273232,0.00026766016,0.00006849627,0.9272568,0.0020141238,0.04134656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010093074,0.000012498312,0.0018725019,0.0010055141,0.000013769978,0.00011673191,0.019349998,0.00055466854,0.0000903516,0.94008,0.036872156,0.000021585058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059251348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036128603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99139434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010420123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010920329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21192324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011782761","doi":"10.1108/00220410510625840","title":"Usability and user perceptions of a thesaurus‐enhanced search interface","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Thesaurus; Usability; Interface (matter); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; User interface; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016213788283936482,"score_gpt":0.34000562021232583,"score_spread":0.32379183192838934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011782761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960459,0.00019839703,0.0014232472,0.000057536305,0.0000046790315,0.00004744738,0.000022392387,0.000037133992,0.0021632372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969535,0.000121217425,0.0021189419,0.00005861356,0.0000046535365,0.000037338432,0.00003193981,0.000012805499,0.0006609779],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99503607,0.0029168255,0.00062352524,0.00023640586,0.0009799742,0.00020708013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655109,0.025354216,0.0023566051,0.0013630571,0.0044630864,0.0009520851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064500114,0.00029877175,0.00040420567,0.0011577433,0.00081244286,0.0033942147,0.00041842257,0.0007193057,0.002139903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033448286,0.00025929543,0.00055162626,0.0005809579,0.0008953119,0.0021375115,0.0010837734,0.0004361142,0.00041730882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021431476,0.0009806138,0.40263572,0.0023060539,0.000245611,0.0016448844,0.42036137,0.0009774304,0.034027234,0.001612714,0.0018036651,0.13126154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019676972,0.008042385,0.63394815,0.0008079118,0.00038269022,0.003956415,0.31391582,0.0068959272,0.011526641,0.0011961687,0.018694863,0.00043629008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020974441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018121747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064500114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051407627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046042612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03411132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015225850","doi":"10.1108/00220411311295315","title":"Nodes and arcs: concept map, semiotics, and knowledge organization","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Terminology; Meaning (existential); Knowledge organization; Domain (mathematical analysis); Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Sociology; Linguistics; Data science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0049372449305333365,"score_gpt":0.2683386110452432,"score_spread":0.2634013661147099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015225850","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35442948,0.010463434,0.3941444,0.011390237,0.00043706567,0.0005686381,0.00039177644,0.0004999062,0.22767504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.930709,0.0015832721,0.062496696,0.00013890075,0.000044327866,0.00030409216,0.000097390206,0.00005039972,0.0045758937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950198,0.0036850276,0.00018549904,0.00034703972,0.0006148109,0.00014784746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98561954,0.010921899,0.0013819371,0.0006153216,0.0009960148,0.00046521323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045694136,0.0006193317,0.00028745885,0.0059311534,0.0023166332,0.0062198127,0.00077715894,0.0010039619,0.003552663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013608792,0.00026063135,0.00033905296,0.006374313,0.018724445,0.014174138,0.0030094048,0.0011246835,0.00037012188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008977463,0.000023245284,0.0033962987,0.00036733097,0.000014219453,0.00027116647,0.062029816,0.0014562844,0.00040223263,0.8852184,0.0012875275,0.04544372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019384424,0.00004875382,0.0026487196,0.00043453043,0.000021413021,0.0005860192,0.061796438,0.007751335,0.0007455651,0.87377346,0.052133374,0.000041044343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033398613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020383028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062198127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035049056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028825253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025429964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017765150","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2012-0150","title":"Beyond obscenity: an analysis of sexual discourse in LIS educational texts","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Sociology; Pejorative; Censorship; Terminology; Value (mathematics); Mainstream; Originality; Media studies; Political science; Social science; Law; Linguistics; Qualitative research; Computer science","score_opus":0.025655809585829286,"score_gpt":0.4103701403948402,"score_spread":0.3847143308090109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017765150","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9450119,0.0017422441,0.0053458004,0.0025751402,0.00008027434,0.0001680923,0.0005239549,0.000057292284,0.04449528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900097,0.001383496,0.003253671,0.00027189704,0.00007403777,0.00015691805,0.0003700392,0.00007196437,0.0044081905],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935905,0.0041390616,0.00041952005,0.00033037277,0.0012197947,0.00030087755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96448606,0.029082522,0.0027681885,0.0008673331,0.0022588342,0.00053708785],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006642991,0.0003352456,0.00044354412,0.013488501,0.005067722,0.0067836037,0.00063278666,0.00082437694,0.0035267097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01917034,0.00025281747,0.00023882026,0.010179089,0.010307298,0.0059584444,0.004793406,0.0013949848,0.0005517527],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042483276,0.00002953803,0.005673996,0.00045302187,0.0000051674488,0.00062915444,0.95703423,0.00004246007,0.001541657,0.012375402,0.00076073804,0.021412028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074888103,0.000040480307,0.01781933,0.0011396841,0.00001679598,0.00077813485,0.8862261,0.00047153118,0.0029834805,0.004366848,0.08612421,0.000025839587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025076082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034844722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005475851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036923497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03973025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020726632","doi":"10.1108/00220411111145061","title":"The modernity of classification","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Modernity; Originality; Foundation (evidence); Mainstream; Epistemology; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Data science; Social science; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Engineering; Machine learning","score_opus":0.052757113600748105,"score_gpt":0.3107569152511119,"score_spread":0.2579998016503638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020726632","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046484787,0.04476118,0.46102884,0.20586523,0.0042925584,0.00024286247,0.0004080231,0.0006057344,0.23631082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82865465,0.012592923,0.12951341,0.010452363,0.004372157,0.0004560017,0.00030312655,0.00033738802,0.013318001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96490234,0.018263146,0.0021198294,0.0049903174,0.008429079,0.0012953178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9166996,0.04712456,0.003954273,0.01772166,0.012271743,0.0022281597],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037377432,0.0007983164,0.0013284138,0.010169389,0.009976003,0.017864134,0.0025731677,0.0034810333,0.0051166047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046626333,0.0006202825,0.0010072049,0.0063400296,0.0895966,0.031527802,0.008771672,0.008200912,0.0014613875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009836241,0.0000074230425,0.000499195,0.00008065943,0.0000073308543,0.000014514939,0.0022730285,0.000134348,0.000056419016,0.9787048,0.0022284023,0.01598398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057008965,0.000013821659,0.00038170634,0.00024524934,0.000006015515,0.00007685282,0.0013815552,0.00071846973,0.00012466784,0.93679106,0.060237307,0.000017507993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005022291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002476537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013297655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008709499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19767314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027894627","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087814","title":"Documentary tools in everyday life: the wedding planner","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Planner; Originality; Apprenticeship; Everyday life; Documentation; Sociology; Ideology; Computer science; Knowledge management; Qualitative research; Political science; Social science; Artificial intelligence; Law","score_opus":0.024626413349837253,"score_gpt":0.36958650674202764,"score_spread":0.3449600933921904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027894627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8753096,0.0013530715,0.028522646,0.0012390434,0.000039981136,0.00018761177,0.00017008722,0.00020313935,0.09297484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781044,0.0005218713,0.012779636,0.00008193452,0.000005939513,0.000060618455,0.0000878584,0.000058258018,0.008299436],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985952,0.0008390432,0.000060883584,0.00015294852,0.00021233846,0.00013965316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687374,0.001781211,0.00039885932,0.00038371317,0.00025237707,0.00031007078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012687566,0.0002653737,0.00019154834,0.0013029223,0.0029085972,0.006465891,0.00079099805,0.00072453055,0.005592208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047207926,0.00024202805,0.00015770145,0.0020234778,0.0077792513,0.0042661456,0.0025700452,0.00089827605,0.0006254352],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000738451,0.00013957561,0.03751656,0.00047976672,0.000013222285,0.0019306868,0.757142,0.00066920876,0.0024451762,0.060416624,0.002780344,0.13639298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006877312,0.00014305042,0.030115366,0.00050226157,0.000013716015,0.0016106194,0.7486446,0.0008379668,0.0018603253,0.008223423,0.20800108,0.0000407361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066393013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008644906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066393013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001992212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023230466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018707752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035928974","doi":"10.1108/00220411011023607","title":"On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980‐2007)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Originality; Metadata; Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Scientific literature; Information retrieval; Altmetrics; Computer science; Data science; Social science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.32507304535495857,"score_gpt":0.5600739134317266,"score_spread":0.23500086807676807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035928974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97191274,0.016927937,0.0010565209,0.000859847,0.00013933028,0.00007289236,0.005106695,0.000037363407,0.0038866065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923328,0.0030602429,0.0011551753,0.00010789084,0.00014497808,0.00006288345,0.0026682124,0.00001494126,0.0004528626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720642,0.0061641363,0.005912841,0.0028456193,0.011977802,0.001035388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70842063,0.15293013,0.07627083,0.015590505,0.043027606,0.0037603234],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03142889,0.00027438742,0.0012754975,0.030442843,0.0011910825,0.0029220767,0.0011810918,0.0008938007,0.0011469868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1471617,0.00024754845,0.0010499521,0.028363751,0.001403608,0.00252709,0.003097461,0.000687859,0.0003313952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031264854,0.000053676828,0.9372136,0.0008354077,0.00052104297,0.00031819625,0.0022458835,0.00029596005,0.0003280381,0.00058802497,0.0017122427,0.055575304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011642135,0.00008222082,0.99005836,0.00025754469,0.00031575985,0.0012600822,0.001727917,0.0003283715,0.00073994824,0.00067136926,0.004516997,0.000029871304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035399897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026509494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024871211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00241921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16621381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041328912","doi":"10.1108/00220410510585214","title":"Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Visitor pattern; Originality; Computer science; Information seeking; Value (mathematics); Digital library; World Wide Web; Quarter (Canadian coin); Information behavior; Data science; Information retrieval; Library science; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.017848961421182235,"score_gpt":0.31234046458478437,"score_spread":0.2944915031636021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041328912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9827473,0.00043413302,0.0065996205,0.00052741077,0.00002583007,0.00011150649,0.0029897173,0.00050165557,0.0060630348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916415,0.00016756664,0.0041093123,0.00008044606,0.000033713997,0.00007701537,0.0018564104,0.0001375524,0.0018964608],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901839,0.004613747,0.00080490654,0.000652503,0.0033248614,0.00042015137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83630687,0.12468526,0.01113237,0.010233744,0.01596919,0.0016724099],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056097996,0.00038822094,0.0006559398,0.005697133,0.00062504725,0.003228282,0.0005753751,0.0005396293,0.0022775657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06268199,0.00021766228,0.0005248364,0.0075508957,0.00082602346,0.0035139988,0.0019539022,0.0009871611,0.001413342],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019364145,0.0008685577,0.6999175,0.0008347188,0.00023924302,0.00020994506,0.014458591,0.002622921,0.005455601,0.0020263542,0.00741586,0.2640142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038375976,0.0010647166,0.91181076,0.00016102465,0.00016427263,0.00072885357,0.01806119,0.043880805,0.0070763305,0.0052828626,0.01154033,0.0001905087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002999605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033341772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055691844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065888296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029667795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045935559","doi":"10.1108/00220410310457993","title":"A model of information practices in accounts of everyday‐life information seeking","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":595,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Information seeking; Everyday life; Neglect; Focus (optics); Strict constructionism; Psychology; Sociology; Information needs; Information behavior; Cognition; Computer science; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.03956720142467514,"score_gpt":0.32667912051034187,"score_spread":0.28711191908566674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045935559","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13417271,0.0041879034,0.42199007,0.029039582,0.00018793702,0.0004897063,0.0005202601,0.0005536698,0.40885818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246871,0.001210965,0.06346607,0.00058083463,0.0000860973,0.0005948273,0.00023343397,0.000121588826,0.009019082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99259686,0.0045667416,0.0003746939,0.0006389477,0.0013608454,0.00046180486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840416,0.011911354,0.0010169727,0.0015850802,0.00094678346,0.00049827213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062389555,0.0009002872,0.0005670408,0.0061497064,0.0039402028,0.011644897,0.0024295624,0.0036610253,0.00448301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013860695,0.0006970479,0.0013274141,0.006341484,0.01890175,0.023127833,0.0041449033,0.0028441658,0.0009549987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017039578,0.000027901697,0.00068918575,0.00007977958,0.000008778655,0.000098661025,0.04028999,0.00093624205,0.00016270689,0.95278555,0.0004267134,0.0044773724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004146689,0.00004121614,0.0011652536,0.00036591594,0.00002947788,0.00046248303,0.019757975,0.014218946,0.0002296461,0.92760575,0.036044538,0.000037322676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0105107855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065117613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011644897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008326387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005738819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060412407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053071422","doi":"10.1108/00220411211209177","title":"Using classification to convict the Khmer Rouge","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Yale University","keywords":"Documentation; Originality; Accountability; Convict; Sociology; Tribunal; Genocide; Human rights; Value (mathematics); Law; Political science; Social science; Qualitative research; Criminology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13599331224217137,"score_gpt":0.43451650530702046,"score_spread":0.2985231930648491,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053071422","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5745146,0.002580741,0.1008765,0.015730953,0.0005916455,0.0012007077,0.0017118066,0.00061597186,0.302177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9266249,0.0006257214,0.05323811,0.0005329754,0.000060408453,0.00038084475,0.0007406125,0.00012974221,0.017666696],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98326343,0.010340433,0.0012559894,0.0011609447,0.0030694467,0.0009096912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9629549,0.016583135,0.0049064015,0.009297591,0.0055683674,0.0006896345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021828292,0.00043146082,0.00045657545,0.011625195,0.008366765,0.011808702,0.0024763236,0.0016121792,0.005358218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04629048,0.00039781295,0.00025757236,0.008768455,0.013469397,0.010325389,0.008115226,0.001864424,0.0010570639],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015342682,0.00003988014,0.04147197,0.0005498902,0.000021869817,0.0006496259,0.46435755,0.0005276253,0.0013292676,0.22868642,0.014857699,0.24735485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018220459,0.0000977589,0.026838103,0.0023683854,0.000041527685,0.0009003417,0.5689685,0.0030113112,0.004638334,0.05605666,0.33693647,0.00012448906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024562294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040019065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024562294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010455659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077133747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11544043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054904740","doi":"10.1108/00220410910937624","title":"Revisiting “what is a document?”","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Historical Linguistics and Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Originality; Epistemology; Interpretation (philosophy); Value (mathematics); Instrumentalism; Point (geometry); Foundationalism; Computer science; Order (exchange); Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Social science; Qualitative research; Mathematics","score_opus":0.017613425717060656,"score_gpt":0.2888991013678106,"score_spread":0.27128567565074996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054904740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027000612,0.09886814,0.069177665,0.21779881,0.010466665,0.00020636883,0.00033836014,0.00033327626,0.57581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8142984,0.04472763,0.029685592,0.021692231,0.00478416,0.0003203476,0.0003798523,0.0005841711,0.083527714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9818503,0.012075058,0.0008989043,0.0014371315,0.0031545497,0.00058411213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9746987,0.014162494,0.001577669,0.0025207857,0.0063368133,0.0007035236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011894678,0.00047868036,0.0005660313,0.0036969115,0.0076796673,0.019389026,0.001533885,0.0028967299,0.006998001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023246652,0.00027633226,0.00046829862,0.004616316,0.03597443,0.01998138,0.004795495,0.0063178064,0.0017045991],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010412959,0.000008198386,0.00022769072,0.0002058382,0.00000293252,0.000088022,0.015586325,0.000066080465,0.00015165287,0.95074624,0.012451758,0.020454874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007122886,0.000022268372,0.0005272573,0.0015682833,0.00000958734,0.00042992548,0.024271397,0.00032268546,0.00053645234,0.16937442,0.8029068,0.000023820177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011787171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006797046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019389026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013134714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010560499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09529948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059516109","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2014-0056","title":"Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Information retrieval","score_opus":0.04345031035981671,"score_gpt":0.34930483806059903,"score_spread":0.3058545277007823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059516109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8761698,0.008084268,0.08590657,0.0015251327,0.00007619194,0.0018946736,0.00016622718,0.00011761928,0.02605961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95774883,0.00111313,0.037945557,0.00036366307,0.000055851877,0.0020385054,0.000089355286,0.000056262823,0.0005889219],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9167393,0.06273767,0.006648849,0.0030648753,0.009905307,0.0009040688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40748274,0.53530174,0.028553499,0.01891491,0.008302759,0.0014442886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074359775,0.0006001493,0.0011853866,0.005348768,0.0020778913,0.0073416447,0.0018059321,0.0009855349,0.003663115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2687298,0.0009138031,0.0007042288,0.0048833755,0.006669525,0.008466586,0.005525511,0.0023049365,0.00033529452],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022322615,0.0030358378,0.2370489,0.015397228,0.0010389294,0.00047188366,0.20935397,0.0034590727,0.016927991,0.09855006,0.0015429928,0.4109409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091891916,0.005091862,0.6498102,0.008564318,0.0014633436,0.0014726709,0.093356006,0.017463213,0.021854743,0.16523606,0.034057736,0.0007109347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013242125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024914334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074359775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029806672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024649492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39325678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064566779","doi":"10.1108/00220410610653299","title":"Building “civilisational competence”: a new role for libraries?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Politics; Competence (human resources); Realm; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Social science; Management; Economics; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.02097025533264822,"score_gpt":0.32344563269040283,"score_spread":0.3024753773577546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064566779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109646425,0.017691897,0.013407859,0.29611468,0.0011224379,0.000103186954,0.000050426464,0.00038392833,0.5614793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96696043,0.0035192333,0.002828138,0.010086469,0.00035092744,0.0000780834,0.00002629537,0.00007324261,0.016077213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858892,0.009905749,0.00041617034,0.0006953803,0.0008733197,0.0022201284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98238105,0.0064910054,0.001467888,0.0020230492,0.0016754402,0.00596159],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012534257,0.0005216438,0.0005959967,0.00262536,0.016528659,0.033419225,0.0016631142,0.0036730308,0.010545249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013473333,0.00043414498,0.00044814768,0.0031839318,0.06625253,0.036943913,0.020262282,0.0051970766,0.0022074936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005101747,0.00008080767,0.0035586196,0.00034869535,0.000013874117,0.0004149074,0.13465725,0.000150806,0.00036600418,0.7655477,0.01496325,0.07984726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019198062,0.00006691426,0.004727317,0.00089398044,0.000014340708,0.00060221285,0.21589585,0.00021861498,0.00066562806,0.16575003,0.61108047,0.00006557011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005607255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062251054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96658075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010907085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022873353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07913679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066141084","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087841","title":"Managing documents at home for serious leisure: a case study of the hobby of gourmet cooking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":123,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hobby; Computer science; Ethnography; Originality; Conceptual framework; Data collection; Sociology; World Wide Web; Qualitative research; Social science; Visual arts; Art","score_opus":0.11402629694355222,"score_gpt":0.4451857493267632,"score_spread":0.331159452383211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066141084","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99249744,0.00032724856,0.0009252891,0.0007904623,0.000017140466,0.000081470105,0.00003557004,0.000018254252,0.0053071487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113995,0.00069651875,0.0027182803,0.0003630246,0.000020341357,0.00008210852,0.000045080793,0.00003412249,0.004900671],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714404,0.0018921816,0.000076278004,0.00023546783,0.000227804,0.00042427322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949419,0.0031166743,0.00046724683,0.00038946778,0.00031557516,0.00076911517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00258842,0.00045239544,0.0005488314,0.0016502127,0.011517766,0.0033313786,0.0019453336,0.0019495812,0.0046845544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063486416,0.00046319063,0.00036310844,0.001982051,0.004977712,0.0026045325,0.0035687925,0.0017881359,0.00055611617],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008124122,0.00034987362,0.008516163,0.00027447846,0.000012997044,0.019832725,0.9468326,0.00008586046,0.0011661313,0.0018618366,0.0015955399,0.019390618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007519156,0.00014681058,0.006318952,0.00015359007,0.0000120825,0.006787284,0.95902455,0.00019075314,0.0006965798,0.00037174136,0.026267936,0.000022264654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016321437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051042847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016321437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030388143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026595362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03245288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069777712","doi":"10.1108/00220410910998924","title":"Emotional labour in librarians' instructional work","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Emotional labor; Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Psychology; Information literacy; Invisibility; Pedagogy; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.016385396074864216,"score_gpt":0.34724045438124235,"score_spread":0.3308550583063781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069777712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9409611,0.005117661,0.0027508207,0.0050272965,0.00014203778,0.000037490645,0.00003963965,0.00009645271,0.045827474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99498427,0.0008445017,0.00034281294,0.0008260024,0.000035887297,0.000017704358,0.000012209315,0.00001761945,0.0029189386],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99280953,0.0049460283,0.00025660536,0.0001988794,0.0010479209,0.00074105716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875838,0.0075012455,0.0016247934,0.00046761884,0.0012369219,0.0015856014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004230796,0.00022730004,0.00044541562,0.0014028249,0.007923557,0.0071016354,0.0006774453,0.00083493,0.0029092887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014216544,0.00027613156,0.00027553513,0.0013533044,0.013032426,0.001966373,0.005857983,0.0012224906,0.00065156963],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000937647,0.00006795017,0.023568595,0.00036599586,0.000021241942,0.00089301483,0.93319124,0.000075709104,0.0010072842,0.0035612765,0.0029300507,0.034223944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009898173,0.00007404066,0.029020105,0.00030251849,0.000020750815,0.00076929264,0.9265921,0.0000715969,0.0005243447,0.0019703875,0.040604286,0.000040743555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010773493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010455822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010773493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043504625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00469256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03156501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071322747","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2014-0037","title":"Differences over discourse structure differences: a reply to Urquhart and Urquhart","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Rhetorical question; Discipline; Epistemology; Strengths and weaknesses; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Computer science; Data science; Linguistics; Social science; Philosophy; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.03010225202968256,"score_gpt":0.31396739110756106,"score_spread":0.28386513907787847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071322747","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00065884955,0.005251387,0.0011963568,0.98569643,0.006185342,0.000007444077,0.000015274938,0.000019655128,0.0009693433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04823541,0.010458563,0.0035423604,0.91717094,0.016764753,0.00017741471,0.000034614666,0.00019849469,0.0034174093],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.94132626,0.034866944,0.0034371712,0.007917305,0.011020604,0.0014318065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60149515,0.34325624,0.007219517,0.008540469,0.035555422,0.003933172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07381124,0.0014368074,0.003163312,0.003586466,0.0112308385,0.013296708,0.006620803,0.03216164,0.004393784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2542011,0.0011638752,0.0013902481,0.00609044,0.051263653,0.040640958,0.012857179,0.06401159,0.0023385922],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016754358,0.00008476666,0.00090273115,0.00059314276,0.00005660534,0.00033281595,0.06231893,0.00028284604,0.00021126117,0.2531515,0.6459357,0.035962027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013502513,0.00012251234,0.0014713397,0.003238317,0.00006643435,0.0007246703,0.048185483,0.001093774,0.0009288468,0.30150414,0.64218926,0.0003401706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011428738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008140032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07381124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010476593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011471176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39035583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077911880","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2013-0110","title":"An interdisciplinary platform for information behavior research in the liberal arts hobby","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hobby; Sociology; The arts; Originality; Context (archaeology); Social science; Scholarship; Public relations; Leisure studies; Sociology of leisure; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Qualitative research; Engineering","score_opus":0.08543100293549707,"score_gpt":0.4921809328197194,"score_spread":0.4067499298842223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077911880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039315857,0.047695763,0.34028992,0.15266162,0.008296118,0.0020618937,0.0020595216,0.0016819781,0.40593728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46446687,0.050371595,0.37236312,0.021846406,0.0069485023,0.01131394,0.0017642173,0.0013762241,0.06954922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9801485,0.014807874,0.0010292404,0.0011575738,0.0024809814,0.00037585414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91340256,0.06368388,0.0035222827,0.012255526,0.0036896735,0.0034460928],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029043373,0.0006304339,0.0014743416,0.009301713,0.004083035,0.015790999,0.0020826715,0.004178651,0.030211639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03760325,0.0005718755,0.0012401609,0.008208075,0.012364735,0.011081196,0.014721827,0.0059562703,0.006810579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006835459,0.00059311057,0.004353767,0.0019876335,0.000065057044,0.00034477687,0.027654413,0.000678771,0.0016398345,0.66007614,0.028750297,0.2737878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032389133,0.00023810467,0.009641604,0.009035836,0.00005330378,0.00042317185,0.026760275,0.001897138,0.0008251494,0.43348053,0.5175183,0.00009421512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009502767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012940284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035552885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008387847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15359789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082584912","doi":"10.1108/00220411211209195","title":"Social discovery tools: extending the principle of user convenience","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Metadata; Warrant; Computer science; Bridge (graph theory); Internet privacy; Business; Medicine","score_opus":0.028570975055179703,"score_gpt":0.31685417411362204,"score_spread":0.28828319905844235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082584912","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066158265,0.0024460654,0.7280008,0.030588252,0.0006046102,0.0010489394,0.00020741046,0.0022271925,0.1687184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7006674,0.0015370122,0.2763561,0.0040332694,0.0006670112,0.001535211,0.00022054192,0.000536595,0.0144469235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9195759,0.055321038,0.004360649,0.0041999705,0.014955364,0.00158699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76924,0.1688049,0.0073594563,0.03793093,0.012573632,0.004091075],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05862208,0.0008710283,0.00092334376,0.006041426,0.007848712,0.023131927,0.0030983137,0.004770241,0.005757085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.122166164,0.0013687231,0.0014158802,0.003308079,0.032359045,0.03559951,0.019507784,0.003982998,0.0019897532],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019509664,0.00013742533,0.00676288,0.0010753929,0.00007507069,0.0006904606,0.0753693,0.0007330449,0.0021487623,0.76000977,0.0057103015,0.14709252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012672169,0.0002831928,0.0023595646,0.000904702,0.00010692601,0.0022161799,0.015507654,0.006819619,0.0026733545,0.6459954,0.32282013,0.00018658864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026471436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019111753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9768681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040091467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076807356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31002688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087441382","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2013-0120","title":"The library assemblage: creative institutions in an information society","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Huntington University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Institution; Assemblage (archaeology); Construct (python library); Sociology; Transformative learning; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Foundation (evidence); Work (physics); Economic Justice; Computer science; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Social science; Political science; Law; Business; Engineering; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.06184731343324912,"score_gpt":0.38771368165334574,"score_spread":0.3258663682200966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087441382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21196325,0.0046784803,0.09933315,0.035348117,0.00039104503,0.00030112185,0.00013062627,0.00065860176,0.6471956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96831316,0.0010806398,0.013699817,0.00061030185,0.00016977315,0.00009673623,0.000041626765,0.000121416815,0.015866473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98710966,0.008314896,0.0005784948,0.00084912934,0.0021657536,0.0009820872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806997,0.010635707,0.002561242,0.0025989395,0.0015855895,0.0019188176],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01130784,0.00039625325,0.00055500783,0.00710522,0.014966152,0.023626877,0.0016825438,0.0023868198,0.012434151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017744226,0.00047032334,0.00061834644,0.0066446555,0.038145546,0.022471027,0.017765174,0.0025169523,0.0019296521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005235388,0.00004046273,0.0029476918,0.00016529913,0.000011790069,0.00038015263,0.093355104,0.00051729684,0.00029155277,0.8620213,0.002892737,0.037324272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004512518,0.00007480937,0.003934237,0.00065529865,0.000042697797,0.0009176493,0.12664999,0.0030522367,0.0011914378,0.52463084,0.3387317,0.0000739927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004920152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062374305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97637314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009189772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011006157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066676736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088638006","doi":"10.1108/00220411311300057","title":"Interpreting reference work with contemporary practice theory","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Typology; Sociology; Knowledge management; Face (sociological concept); Structuring; Interpersonal communication; Computer science; Service (business); Public relations; Social science; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.030506919127723655,"score_gpt":0.3466890264161326,"score_spread":0.31618210728840895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088638006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10436696,0.011301323,0.3187194,0.057859004,0.0012112905,0.0004209395,0.00017318162,0.00030507022,0.50564295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464387,0.0027388902,0.042349137,0.0015001147,0.00040377813,0.00068676885,0.00010424515,0.00008207194,0.0056962566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9682814,0.025898049,0.0007468303,0.0018558963,0.001994347,0.0012234531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9499654,0.040767685,0.0019404535,0.0045001106,0.0020906841,0.0007356205],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025231257,0.0012610093,0.0011144159,0.010704458,0.010090477,0.020367697,0.0049737007,0.0061781635,0.00771489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026030265,0.00064803654,0.000861462,0.009151375,0.09902044,0.02018819,0.009562749,0.005566812,0.0008226674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096210915,0.000029972824,0.0004629503,0.00014107168,0.0000059361732,0.0001969016,0.061793737,0.00028584496,0.000051092968,0.9304106,0.0006602036,0.0059521655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027821196,0.000039450282,0.00069492584,0.00081522693,0.000014155505,0.00027359178,0.110108085,0.0016549953,0.00025988664,0.8141498,0.07194301,0.000019142464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005271781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037768178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9796323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0129785575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006892076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13343722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089259215","doi":"10.1108/00220411011066763","title":"Classification in a social world: bias and trust","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Computer science; Pluralism (philosophy); Transparency (behavior); Value (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Trustworthiness; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Sociology; Data science; Political science; Law; Social science; Internet privacy; Computer security","score_opus":0.03093916958424952,"score_gpt":0.3438346007629026,"score_spread":0.3128954311786531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089259215","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19515249,0.005906758,0.5277025,0.11525331,0.0011066092,0.0005209453,0.00025173122,0.0005438051,0.15356183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96534026,0.0008040616,0.030574627,0.0011294815,0.0002545373,0.00017207096,0.000073252435,0.00008067687,0.0015710471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8003569,0.13309847,0.0145362755,0.008621559,0.04016261,0.0032241894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57002217,0.28570443,0.047277134,0.059570923,0.032925796,0.0044995784],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.113621034,0.00055010803,0.0016014667,0.011074531,0.009594497,0.022977564,0.0023855746,0.0034411866,0.003058237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2594408,0.00074821943,0.00077490124,0.011842737,0.057469875,0.032151103,0.013366665,0.003998736,0.00056654675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048893853,0.000024816014,0.007975821,0.0002775756,0.00006423428,0.00016523123,0.039707176,0.00086365436,0.00032918167,0.9080439,0.0019436562,0.04055599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026226462,0.000036838166,0.0022322203,0.0005736373,0.000043506174,0.00022570117,0.015001854,0.0042138128,0.00046482417,0.9409685,0.036152486,0.00006056836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006178884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032505689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011365732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010330234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60089266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105523876","doi":"10.1108/00220411011087850","title":"A multilevel model of HIV/AIDS information/help network development","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social capital; Social network (sociolinguistics); Social support; Coping (psychology); Originality; Sociology; Knowledge management; Psychology; Computer science; Business; Social psychology; Qualitative research; World Wide Web; Psychiatry; Social science","score_opus":0.01782160198863562,"score_gpt":0.3004902507299031,"score_spread":0.28266864874126746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105523876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35011113,0.0013073423,0.13977273,0.01842079,0.00009090987,0.0015039629,0.003296902,0.0006037061,0.4848925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9354956,0.00087421207,0.03372287,0.0002746775,0.000023476123,0.0006058774,0.0005340835,0.000029789398,0.02843929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989913,0.0004354032,0.000027008835,0.00016012609,0.00019235243,0.00019381043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979595,0.0007632637,0.00029191372,0.00012284947,0.00048583688,0.00037664693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012438885,0.00036529303,0.00024332308,0.0020298325,0.0032876253,0.0035965424,0.001544967,0.0007254059,0.016661258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044680024,0.00031499032,0.00049991655,0.0021576355,0.0029722673,0.0032990528,0.0021756368,0.00096264394,0.0010821369],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008943826,0.00018678064,0.060047444,0.00024648508,0.00010013592,0.0011510586,0.023609642,0.02558147,0.0009965658,0.8271775,0.006150696,0.054662857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016039063,0.00029996506,0.08178453,0.00075553387,0.00036529027,0.0014174266,0.028888376,0.28478453,0.000636327,0.4102695,0.19051982,0.00011837115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2967166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2803607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2967166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012554788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012642686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58997905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112341358","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2013-0133","title":"Beyond traditional publishing models","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Publishing and Scholarly Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Timeline; Originality; Audience measurement; Publicity; Scholarly communication; Sociology; Product (mathematics); Electronic publishing; Process (computing); Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; The Internet; Social science; History; Political science; Qualitative research; Law","score_opus":0.1789991944869216,"score_gpt":0.28273827787485295,"score_spread":0.10373908338793136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112341358","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01817264,0.0032238357,0.121679604,0.027067069,0.0010488224,0.00037747508,0.00034454887,0.0006002375,0.82748586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7040083,0.0058383085,0.05469727,0.0033428955,0.0018507222,0.0009041399,0.00042460408,0.00062792154,0.22830579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98560125,0.0072768196,0.0006904613,0.0017932319,0.003937548,0.00070069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9556898,0.02245511,0.002640187,0.011057495,0.006055045,0.002102433],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015176807,0.0008517826,0.00070142664,0.0038951407,0.0058331736,0.029656248,0.00393651,0.0049179136,0.03148024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031379834,0.00059325114,0.0011082402,0.00513771,0.020418843,0.03043174,0.0057934998,0.004400867,0.011516869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001127356,0.0000178447,0.0001738041,0.00004388066,0.0000036524361,0.000051693794,0.0015018574,0.00036699712,0.000029626874,0.990395,0.0018396736,0.0055647106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003557781,0.000042721636,0.00018383366,0.00023051794,0.000012095716,0.00025999476,0.0019305495,0.0032509216,0.0002157863,0.8177137,0.17610145,0.000022920081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026405526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002028831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97034377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008165469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008510582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10531193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2133732808","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2014-0129","title":"The role of emotions in online information seeking and sharing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Amusement; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Contempt; Worry; Information seeking; Content analysis; Information sharing; Computer science; Anxiety; World Wide Web; Sociology","score_opus":0.01712079679858132,"score_gpt":0.29226983402361506,"score_spread":0.27514903722503375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2133732808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801072,0.00063036074,0.0018119302,0.00047574454,0.000024510364,0.00003986708,0.00002036563,0.000012854121,0.01687723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887246,0.00015120945,0.00046753514,0.000039736977,0.000013268132,0.000014932394,0.000007185771,0.000004539397,0.00042915836],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666506,0.0021493754,0.00011647593,0.00016834069,0.0005966881,0.00030408954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914942,0.006056444,0.0013314148,0.00023960142,0.00046690655,0.000411381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026671612,0.0002360793,0.000276922,0.00072651455,0.0012031266,0.003750447,0.0002694537,0.00066350127,0.0016225259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077957176,0.00019214248,0.00034687424,0.000523944,0.001887961,0.0022277876,0.0020323058,0.0008389989,0.00020790927],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012482206,0.00056539284,0.15695436,0.0013638083,0.0001784565,0.002353009,0.6445798,0.0008303872,0.03206264,0.01702997,0.0011297712,0.1417042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006134882,0.00090950046,0.5208853,0.0007092025,0.00023478527,0.0027328075,0.41782537,0.004114196,0.0105763385,0.014563761,0.027186058,0.00020132768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004433359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028081806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003750447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064858334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047361382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014105439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140842165","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000007098","title":"Mapping national research profiles in social science disciplines","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Data science; Field (mathematics); Baseline (sea); Citation impact; Citation analysis; Scientometrics; Regional science; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Benchmark (surveying); Statistics; Geography; Information retrieval; Econometrics; Data mining; Library science; Political science; Cartography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.7583291958422465,"score_gpt":0.6992803763177389,"score_spread":0.05904881952450758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140842165","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86854595,0.0010443558,0.0928946,0.00041685882,0.00008605252,0.00020661953,0.0067625516,0.0011224643,0.02892051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588586,0.00038461146,0.036338203,0.000027214692,0.000025102188,0.00012819482,0.0032677073,0.00008886073,0.00088139414],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966414,0.0012532761,0.00028843776,0.0006467264,0.0009563855,0.00021376612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98441744,0.007729802,0.003365686,0.0022984664,0.0018284448,0.00036019372],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002942014,0.00037136668,0.00041983818,0.015733004,0.0005436181,0.0028344318,0.0004116887,0.00039700052,0.0031207441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02352447,0.00019501107,0.0006097572,0.018848546,0.00052732154,0.0024775984,0.0028884835,0.00047940528,0.00068218424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000626104,0.00014629634,0.3764652,0.0011056738,0.00042869948,0.00046471646,0.009115664,0.03306716,0.009383695,0.046398845,0.004228083,0.51856995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005427759,0.00030121783,0.80847555,0.00040144016,0.00025450546,0.00090693595,0.0102404775,0.06112588,0.007934103,0.06437018,0.045711376,0.00022404447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029047194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003249775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008690291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072515156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015559018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342073150","doi":"10.1108/jdoc-09-2015-0111","title":"On the composition of scientific abstracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Computer science; Rhetorical question; Argumentation theory; Relation (database); Information retrieval; Originality; Similarity (geometry); Scientific writing; Composition (language); Value (mathematics); Linguistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.013616701985817723,"score_gpt":0.3029858504638016,"score_spread":0.2893691484779839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342073150","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40476066,0.026108546,0.42926428,0.011314786,0.005802013,0.0045342664,0.012132519,0.0039005654,0.10218237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63578093,0.0061054174,0.32510608,0.0012151396,0.0027315859,0.0021311615,0.01250298,0.001533268,0.012893484],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9381936,0.023137463,0.010773021,0.0048560128,0.022278408,0.0007614921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.711122,0.15962005,0.041247778,0.0143624395,0.06935618,0.0042916536],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02917601,0.0008729821,0.0011313342,0.023388535,0.0043579503,0.009041313,0.0012152229,0.0012625067,0.0066799424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23837289,0.0007777446,0.0010625027,0.017462224,0.0024501767,0.008899843,0.0044819615,0.0014780514,0.0032181619],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018965218,0.00022991297,0.049110565,0.00980584,0.0005174818,0.00218844,0.029371947,0.004388246,0.04107347,0.09136626,0.03846021,0.7315911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028235686,0.0011457029,0.12223194,0.004459243,0.0010557956,0.006165283,0.019013286,0.035446726,0.03834672,0.19583596,0.5755493,0.0004676744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010953654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000777865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029269643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043636537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15429932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462473632","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2015-0110","title":"Illusions of a “Bond”: tagging cultural products across online platforms","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Western University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); World Wide Web; Computer science; Subject (documents); Theme (computing); Reading (process); Focus (optics); Product (mathematics); Sociology; History; Political science","score_opus":0.026899734514892342,"score_gpt":0.3382282509249075,"score_spread":0.31132851641001513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462473632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9250427,0.00095505343,0.01864575,0.003178212,0.000113051,0.00013453604,0.000073898664,0.00008667846,0.05177022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925045,0.00027703375,0.0041230028,0.00037617382,0.000033306387,0.00006604193,0.000029614106,0.000052151776,0.002538057],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98465085,0.009970149,0.0005608731,0.0012594222,0.0029002451,0.00065853907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95943546,0.025660522,0.006581898,0.0049514547,0.0020201895,0.0013504946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012792373,0.0005540533,0.0004171895,0.003802895,0.0092963055,0.015317274,0.0014779164,0.0021664484,0.0028027643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035308313,0.0007807342,0.00043083073,0.0037014575,0.021200493,0.020969428,0.0131056225,0.0025168497,0.0005637597],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007895038,0.000026593396,0.020454317,0.00015719137,0.000023158393,0.00088966027,0.9278876,0.00008854546,0.002046832,0.020425979,0.00061696616,0.027304145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009290676,0.000120192395,0.017907353,0.0004997294,0.000049473,0.001342136,0.91541576,0.0007268999,0.0017138241,0.015479546,0.0466582,0.00007774308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005512928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066478197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015317274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029530157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018758427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06765336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2508121523","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2015-0080","title":"Pictorial metaphors for information","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Originality; Computer science; The arts; Set (abstract data type); Beauty; Information science; Identity (music); Psychology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Visual arts; Linguistics; Qualitative research; Social science; Art","score_opus":0.015678800603762734,"score_gpt":0.32468659318804566,"score_spread":0.3090077925842829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2508121523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23881961,0.013202039,0.29747683,0.013223699,0.0012382519,0.00062341173,0.0013068349,0.00071866834,0.43339065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90417343,0.0021966791,0.08045593,0.000822383,0.00014089147,0.00044509635,0.0002957187,0.00015754646,0.011312346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488294,0.0036536274,0.00016622727,0.00027743584,0.00084472256,0.00017508074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910794,0.006068066,0.0010483232,0.0008567421,0.00071178674,0.00023560374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030091428,0.00090559624,0.00026300276,0.00527531,0.0019268548,0.0055148443,0.0010129836,0.0010082681,0.008129913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013864887,0.00030158175,0.00061192235,0.0043324195,0.010953154,0.0069603873,0.0021643941,0.0015771181,0.00072196615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010600763,0.00003235123,0.0017726199,0.000785202,0.000019216905,0.0009149761,0.10997466,0.00089497527,0.002385893,0.82541525,0.011955627,0.045743108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043701366,0.00012790006,0.0056120413,0.001626267,0.00003644946,0.005543285,0.1059179,0.005251887,0.0016923342,0.24930617,0.62474746,0.00009455271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017629268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018046303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008129913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024764272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011964843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027197301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520081532","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2016-0035","title":"Information seeking and use in the context of minimalist lifestyles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Originality; Curiosity; Thematic analysis; Poverty; Psychological resilience; Psychology; Creativity; Sociology; Public relations; Qualitative research; Social science; Social psychology; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.025500425448497753,"score_gpt":0.3184799363790255,"score_spread":0.29297951093052776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520081532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99399513,0.00034730395,0.00024264587,0.00073122204,0.0000038956982,0.000011142894,0.00002207674,0.000006717126,0.004639846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993135,0.0001510911,0.00017008053,0.000062559826,0.0000039592605,0.000008006518,0.00001009855,0.000002331717,0.0002785284],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998176,0.0010205316,0.0001310349,0.00015150444,0.0002325738,0.0002883094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924992,0.0037831583,0.0020467844,0.0003803774,0.00043831364,0.00085224345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016989108,0.000098917204,0.00028975614,0.0015330717,0.0037621811,0.0035915424,0.00043768517,0.00047574684,0.0018744782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008158208,0.0001707008,0.00015278377,0.0014852457,0.0047150985,0.0026346971,0.0045318445,0.0008684468,0.00014826735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006131343,0.00009626621,0.11993382,0.0001896481,0.000012356058,0.00078589114,0.8465186,0.000048278078,0.0005652276,0.005211865,0.00041498218,0.02616182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048222123,0.0001439867,0.16858767,0.00022140508,0.000018000235,0.001645124,0.80692554,0.0001701408,0.00034548025,0.004182752,0.01772904,0.000025972251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065052067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008857387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065052067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017041083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016472458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012934685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520992866","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2015-0144","title":"The role of agency in historians’ experiences of serendipity in physical and digital information environments","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Originality; Grounded theory; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Qualitative research; Social science; History","score_opus":0.006658093759537086,"score_gpt":0.1958820623895149,"score_spread":0.1892239686299778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520992866","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9664007,0.0025562048,0.0018973676,0.0035447953,0.00006650867,0.00003479778,0.000023590512,0.000018363058,0.025457738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975091,0.0005527979,0.00021843813,0.00013136388,0.00001161424,0.000008792912,0.000006863959,0.000007816969,0.0015531023],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99089336,0.0066124215,0.00029658538,0.0005206109,0.00068725424,0.0009897782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98464125,0.010441672,0.0017993401,0.0009877575,0.00085430266,0.001275759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013488698,0.00036682063,0.0005427879,0.0034637742,0.015307094,0.011212252,0.00136192,0.0012742467,0.0029486697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015525023,0.00067694805,0.00025986662,0.0034174463,0.048750527,0.0073532085,0.0074779117,0.0022939502,0.00014421242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009886759,0.0000025816203,0.0024529728,0.000018502153,0.000001483129,0.00019985529,0.9925925,0.000013408536,0.00005738348,0.0030001707,0.000105422354,0.0015457376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001901883,0.000012104778,0.0022103763,0.00007326067,0.0000036804856,0.00020018566,0.9842398,0.000025837715,0.00007684486,0.0008338182,0.012314794,0.0000073509427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051328603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07773936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051328603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013983553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077294433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10205966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542508357","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2016-0073","title":"What everybody knows: embodied information in serious leisure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Sport Psychology and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Phenomenology (philosophy); Hobby; Sign (mathematics); Sociology; Reading (process); Amateur; Epistemology; Cognitive science; Computer science; Psychology; Visual arts; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019565143353999042,"score_gpt":0.37805689168247003,"score_spread":0.35849174832847097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542508357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39375925,0.009747233,0.073926866,0.023637658,0.0006557119,0.00016061593,0.00027862733,0.00028838118,0.49754566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822588,0.0013916312,0.0053649964,0.00069912145,0.00008320277,0.000036016238,0.00007455872,0.00006013022,0.0100315865],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960685,0.002518335,0.00017852127,0.000364535,0.0005746783,0.00029545475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992527,0.0052382955,0.0006603585,0.0006081645,0.00043627055,0.00052995305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026220307,0.00039359153,0.00038457353,0.001726311,0.0041868538,0.008904947,0.0010726823,0.0020562303,0.010214288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011935063,0.00030519877,0.00045140574,0.0012967143,0.017823711,0.013699991,0.008216028,0.0020064923,0.0011168103],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017486059,0.000105389634,0.004275475,0.0012448828,0.000041402644,0.0015123899,0.7288566,0.00044098636,0.0030299202,0.1983021,0.0039853253,0.058030594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000381047,0.00021004149,0.0064728498,0.002076773,0.00008559261,0.0026094092,0.47259274,0.0012457091,0.002448143,0.2184825,0.29361984,0.00011823895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021448426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021125276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010214288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018775263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016283588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03417021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599420210","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2016-0068","title":"The way of WalDorF: fostering creativity in LIS programs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Meaning (existential); Computer science; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08959758315255699,"score_gpt":0.4446249988348613,"score_spread":0.3550274156823043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599420210","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66451174,0.0007316892,0.10825664,0.013213833,0.0002717452,0.0006151178,0.00006575927,0.0005880216,0.21174555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95911884,0.00030614738,0.029063674,0.0008061663,0.000037914546,0.00041918978,0.000030541207,0.00006937897,0.010147944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899815,0.0070713405,0.0002612256,0.0006892602,0.0012338684,0.0007628865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789917,0.012890157,0.002103585,0.0021920279,0.0012411537,0.002581286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010812516,0.0006409938,0.00035994744,0.0021114515,0.007018904,0.012198551,0.0018172225,0.0019461329,0.006137624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032207,0.00045253884,0.0007840265,0.0015587757,0.0095459055,0.008087393,0.008836904,0.0027714965,0.0009975372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036771325,0.0013760773,0.03557811,0.00040479872,0.000026397372,0.0011550717,0.09223457,0.0048781615,0.0028528653,0.47062096,0.012721017,0.37778425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030106338,0.0023203862,0.04057949,0.0022181056,0.00013090024,0.0012781718,0.14037092,0.024204094,0.009444498,0.49196613,0.2868184,0.00036791706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031713485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005477856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012198551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046964125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010803268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05718279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759724852","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2016-0045","title":"Information activities as serious leisure within the fanfiction community","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Games and Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Originality; Library science; Information science; World Wide Web; Public relations; Qualitative research; Computer science; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.01972860829692162,"score_gpt":0.34301809856350174,"score_spread":0.3232894902665801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759724852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8716276,0.0017683537,0.0075277346,0.0033108862,0.00015272232,0.0002222934,0.00014499642,0.00011840946,0.115126945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916039,0.00043397053,0.003048316,0.00026400026,0.00004635199,0.000077930796,0.00006138094,0.000031341708,0.004432845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907799,0.006368118,0.00025360112,0.00051781815,0.0014198769,0.0006607271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97233915,0.018224832,0.0028989327,0.0023284028,0.0018776271,0.0023310666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00801138,0.00037707208,0.00037560595,0.0056127715,0.010564545,0.009472864,0.0011941543,0.001382569,0.0046878033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017505324,0.0002961129,0.0003269821,0.0040865773,0.014201849,0.008871653,0.0062827086,0.0013924722,0.00032921953],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006678006,0.000104192215,0.029314728,0.00031064695,0.000011448379,0.0009783605,0.8661118,0.00007503575,0.00068584597,0.04262322,0.0026982077,0.05701978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016676475,0.00013194172,0.027206175,0.0006678871,0.0000201455,0.0019525301,0.7692102,0.00036190785,0.0008445191,0.017311094,0.18221903,0.000058011825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003077663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069865063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010564545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027220286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004248428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04236877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760487352","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2016-0089","title":"Health information practices of young parents","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Health Literacy and Information Accessibility","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Child and Family Research Institute; University of British Columbia","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","keywords":"Information literacy; Seekers; Originality; Context (archaeology); Information seeking; Health literacy; Focus group; Information sharing; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Health care; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.08270499803879422,"score_gpt":0.5511381592614655,"score_spread":0.46843316122267126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760487352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996716,0.0007519019,0.00015145319,0.0003675476,0.000008693091,0.000016032513,0.00011745627,0.000005057161,0.0018659483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976471,0.0010384622,0.00029159838,0.00014828946,0.0000033794693,0.00002025853,0.000083819745,0.00000219827,0.0007649265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993173,0.00030885963,0.000056251327,0.00006184856,0.00016243629,0.00009330698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954248,0.0023175336,0.0008279004,0.0001999641,0.0007266913,0.0005031438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016653389,0.0000869119,0.00018567772,0.0006227134,0.0014080348,0.0014729629,0.00020210515,0.00030698263,0.001482587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008177941,0.00015684949,0.000118921256,0.000734895,0.0006941166,0.00062854704,0.00069202145,0.00036205398,0.00017133041],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005872715,0.00003827284,0.5505039,0.00014267548,0.000011842564,0.0010248196,0.3992472,0.000044122782,0.0006263333,0.00040406582,0.0012207457,0.0466773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008529543,0.00020325936,0.40943092,0.00077725324,0.000032379205,0.0010778684,0.565794,0.00016997392,0.00067188306,0.00039597426,0.021409562,0.000028468847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1037049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09733766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1037049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017662519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00267691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20620257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765390333","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2016-0112","title":"Identifying “best bets” for searching in chemical engineering","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Database; Computer science; Information retrieval; Originality; Bibliographic database; Search engine indexing; Subject (documents); Web of science; World Wide Web; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.638216984837964,"score_gpt":0.6510249154957314,"score_spread":0.012807930657767419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765390333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4615431,0.24612916,0.07907705,0.049740493,0.0022203084,0.0046121264,0.012742059,0.0015002082,0.14243549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76156294,0.03963731,0.18127075,0.0064481543,0.0007023038,0.0027187474,0.0046250806,0.0005201742,0.0025144566],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8288185,0.082766496,0.030120516,0.0068476675,0.04851346,0.002933333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48760703,0.40373605,0.041417625,0.019683007,0.04408125,0.0034751173],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1094698,0.00089032727,0.0033360254,0.058487978,0.004477206,0.026210075,0.003858159,0.0024787653,0.0072350823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48481375,0.0010229382,0.002914626,0.058632158,0.002994729,0.021824194,0.007600868,0.001996062,0.0022326962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018932882,0.0004819225,0.10919913,0.022336764,0.002081226,0.0002580741,0.0067598876,0.0014878585,0.0027537765,0.037942436,0.020649364,0.7941564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078423135,0.0035932525,0.37010306,0.08937283,0.008799553,0.004149086,0.08094245,0.016692966,0.02020374,0.17549372,0.22863838,0.001226664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036235065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007800304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94151205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066299518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076101464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5789386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2770828450","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2017-0026","title":"Expanding the scope of affect: taxonomy construction for emotions, tones, and associations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Emotions and Moral Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Context (archaeology); Originality; Variety (cybernetics); Situated; Taxonomy (biology); Psychology; Reading (process); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Social psychology; Linguistics; Communication","score_opus":0.07590749677110867,"score_gpt":0.41091816944013154,"score_spread":0.33501067266902285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2770828450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42864648,0.0035686856,0.34475684,0.0054874015,0.00059680606,0.0022408003,0.0017659892,0.0007475704,0.21218944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82695115,0.00127193,0.16121335,0.0005879491,0.00011256715,0.0020886157,0.00092400674,0.00012862956,0.006721868],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943916,0.0030176656,0.000543329,0.0006642053,0.0009964519,0.0003867883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98648226,0.0065787113,0.0015001527,0.0016233076,0.0031342728,0.00068133505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007318402,0.0007188168,0.0004820176,0.0063757175,0.0034830668,0.007440903,0.0006691588,0.0010448731,0.006087009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020436283,0.00036617863,0.0010049997,0.0038455531,0.005235456,0.008855148,0.0051649376,0.0019411637,0.0009571357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022561577,0.0001366106,0.07017132,0.0018740157,0.00007902815,0.00061299844,0.33998993,0.0014280088,0.0062421095,0.27855623,0.008181688,0.2925025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004989779,0.00028240797,0.13203658,0.0026770472,0.00023443635,0.0013197437,0.3352332,0.011079287,0.0028936383,0.27751768,0.2364449,0.0002311706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004059933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005490717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007440903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003164855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024831423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03870392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796106067","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2016-0113","title":"Feeling documents: toward a phenomenology of information seeking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embodied cognition; Phenomenology (philosophy); Feeling; Existentialism; Cognition; Originality; Psychology; Consciousness; Affect (linguistics); Perception; Computer science; Cognitive science; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Creativity; Communication","score_opus":0.20278971487768432,"score_gpt":0.4657704889685669,"score_spread":0.26298077409088255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796106067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60377187,0.00916391,0.1926317,0.020993562,0.00037529264,0.00067152636,0.00033027487,0.00030084606,0.17176099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758563,0.0014959332,0.017778577,0.00078327453,0.00008278051,0.00018626235,0.000058746315,0.000049424656,0.0037087146],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960563,0.002845068,0.00016404377,0.00022650843,0.00046267998,0.00024532966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935777,0.005134348,0.00037904963,0.00033124525,0.00029628648,0.00028143456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044710557,0.0003967998,0.00040086624,0.0021372023,0.0036295783,0.007189141,0.0010266242,0.0025151405,0.0021272555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009539907,0.00033071407,0.0005789409,0.0023189422,0.018749457,0.013190943,0.0040453905,0.00265145,0.00029154512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055019886,0.00004324264,0.0013080157,0.00026431878,0.000006959713,0.00043035802,0.7574628,0.00028588084,0.0014767946,0.22720978,0.00075045036,0.010706443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054164695,0.00023083604,0.0032194995,0.0005786031,0.000030279214,0.0020986455,0.56152046,0.0026946822,0.0014554975,0.31227732,0.11571067,0.00012933745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018508575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091432437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007189141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023533336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012544338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02364546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797548704","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2017-0111","title":"“Systemic Managerial Constraints”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Data Analysis and Archiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grounded theory; Managerialism; Agency (philosophy); Precarity; Sociology; Originality; Context (archaeology); Structure and agency; Qualitative research; Thematic analysis; Information system; Public relations; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.015236049536770045,"score_gpt":0.3516649995912342,"score_spread":0.33642895005446416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797548704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6212202,0.00300515,0.04895686,0.033011295,0.00042176762,0.00063980283,0.00038607576,0.0002226605,0.29213628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99110353,0.000302171,0.0034939128,0.0011973439,0.000048806636,0.0001327312,0.000045254754,0.000015180723,0.0036610656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95814407,0.023515565,0.0025015518,0.0032271352,0.00786482,0.004746869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9165668,0.04528647,0.011893558,0.009079235,0.011374995,0.0057990453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02703612,0.00038507025,0.00047094133,0.0019702672,0.0058189556,0.011500575,0.0015494616,0.0014159395,0.009379311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04944112,0.00040730706,0.00039183832,0.0034371482,0.012957853,0.006206057,0.0058821924,0.0024737453,0.00067263894],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000134304,0.00025285888,0.049643513,0.0012114503,0.00009270719,0.0012183301,0.13488792,0.0018567079,0.0019709805,0.68061775,0.008872222,0.11924141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080244135,0.00039531692,0.06022261,0.0022442925,0.00008300339,0.0015311096,0.25058064,0.0038522275,0.0022709183,0.29451233,0.3840589,0.00016845539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008689292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010149198,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02703612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012092488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022702413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14298236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801307989","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2017-0150","title":"Data rescue archive weather (DRAW)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Data science; Metadata; Information repository; Digital preservation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Data quality; Data extraction; World Wide Web; Database; Computer data storage; Engineering","score_opus":0.11657678500123948,"score_gpt":0.42839104480247114,"score_spread":0.3118142598012317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801307989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075831495,0.00263988,0.21453476,0.023477288,0.0035141078,0.010614331,0.22534181,0.06757847,0.37646788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3100034,0.0026844714,0.28907803,0.0046466193,0.001294759,0.009427561,0.2068193,0.01456995,0.16147591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921578,0.002188933,0.0007487014,0.0008428571,0.003588754,0.0004729414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9523238,0.0075001665,0.004871421,0.019080788,0.011798641,0.0044252626],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014490506,0.0004759582,0.00047383245,0.0032743737,0.0020401184,0.0064593446,0.0032406852,0.0009729586,0.031040246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041834276,0.0005359458,0.0003587031,0.0059406725,0.001990977,0.0056821397,0.007656257,0.0016922526,0.017680801],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006359806,0.00013099556,0.012278217,0.0010840103,0.00004301645,0.0003477649,0.0047288304,0.0016820411,0.0030006221,0.0267806,0.666538,0.28274992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011705623,0.00012609003,0.008678811,0.00042364624,0.000025289484,0.00015910265,0.0015913324,0.0017165873,0.003866737,0.003260233,0.9799677,0.000067437526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021775806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019463204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026834514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011131499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801569311","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2017-0137","title":"“Natural allies”","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Humanities and Scholarship","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Snowball sampling; Outreach; Originality; Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Political science; Knowledge management; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03249098943109329,"score_gpt":0.276497369952192,"score_spread":0.2440063805210987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801569311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018910471,0.005806985,0.01525605,0.05583924,0.0045288247,0.00017855888,0.0006443916,0.00037927192,0.8984563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47187966,0.004248032,0.011979698,0.03319349,0.0014244826,0.0005033386,0.0007130276,0.0006479532,0.47541028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465513,0.002736543,0.00015101238,0.0010648516,0.00093980087,0.00045265217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973742,0.0006532096,0.0002357514,0.000973908,0.00039934737,0.00036356866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035808266,0.0005995419,0.00049587805,0.0010881242,0.008898779,0.006245788,0.0012178916,0.0017914361,0.038459066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007016465,0.00030365065,0.00046076512,0.001200137,0.023648655,0.008846394,0.00791608,0.004017341,0.009339208],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006164423,0.000032868953,0.0011163435,0.00021923831,0.000018021818,0.0003348441,0.042490713,0.0000977296,0.00057853636,0.78812456,0.12259524,0.044330195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030857655,0.000010549518,0.0002366557,0.00012352287,0.0000021726896,0.00017395247,0.0068819784,0.00002809698,0.00008212437,0.0248517,0.967599,0.0000071721774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041660187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008979244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038459066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030126642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002787469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12865835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885032795","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2018-0057","title":"The lifeways we avoid","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Context (archaeology); Originality; Psychological intervention; Intervention (counseling); Conversation; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Public relations; Sociology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Political science; Creativity","score_opus":0.03280066827371713,"score_gpt":0.42276617976110725,"score_spread":0.3899655114873901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885032795","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0398423,0.008574464,0.030067742,0.17487913,0.005467962,0.00018789085,0.0004709445,0.00069786096,0.73981184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.655131,0.007108219,0.011228643,0.047614425,0.002157129,0.00048859266,0.00057179824,0.00095710985,0.2747431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98967427,0.005354418,0.00030668106,0.0014627865,0.0018023287,0.0013995221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532986,0.00069551344,0.0007874156,0.0009716815,0.0007801372,0.001435434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033777824,0.0011511391,0.0007842948,0.0016406212,0.014934958,0.018302862,0.0018514919,0.004018438,0.04077008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009615803,0.000525243,0.0008477268,0.0010029423,0.03688309,0.01955846,0.016768515,0.008064383,0.018630788],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007646545,0.00008512434,0.0029449104,0.0002448206,0.000059326645,0.0007837584,0.1374663,0.00031523398,0.00082276255,0.7109761,0.09819295,0.04803232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012159569,0.000041001033,0.00044378394,0.0003210362,0.0000126842415,0.00039050382,0.04859185,0.00007333544,0.00016781302,0.11067826,0.83923054,0.000036952504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058517964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00675404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04077008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034369885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049054385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1363895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889328087","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2018-0037","title":"Documenting acousmatic music interpretation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Interpretation (philosophy); Originality; Relation (database); Point (geometry); Grounded theory; Computer science; Epistemology; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science; Data mining","score_opus":0.017850066793592242,"score_gpt":0.33645740436998517,"score_spread":0.3186073375763929,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889328087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5062228,0.0064322148,0.16817385,0.016122842,0.0011357606,0.0007359044,0.00083808333,0.0008126499,0.29952598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9664167,0.0010583661,0.017153364,0.00054573093,0.00014734463,0.00014049161,0.00020030899,0.00023736428,0.014100234],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97974604,0.012633146,0.00084001507,0.001153323,0.0047080438,0.0009195311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520237,0.03315181,0.0028274455,0.004650883,0.006279896,0.0010662844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01966623,0.00064094464,0.0005541383,0.0043572383,0.005943621,0.0090963775,0.0018411295,0.0015380292,0.008212512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04562027,0.0002774505,0.0003732019,0.0035349927,0.01579796,0.005198657,0.0059593315,0.00204654,0.0013428618],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007715578,0.000027903277,0.0041464344,0.0009186769,0.000013604136,0.0011503323,0.80712503,0.0003141431,0.004081208,0.073791444,0.0055998755,0.10275423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014963927,0.00007788534,0.007348248,0.0028162925,0.000027993194,0.0016517357,0.61609745,0.0012021435,0.004479445,0.025306683,0.34090918,0.0000679479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010635488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01118815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01966623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007679519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009914601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10400617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917432326","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2018-0125","title":"Patterns of citations for the growth of knowledge: a Foucauldian perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Citation; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Qualitative research; Epistemology; Computer science; Sociology; Data science; Knowledge management; Social science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.3639709923264734,"score_gpt":0.5913081892117475,"score_spread":0.22733719688527415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917432326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.391539,0.012289973,0.3077056,0.04662331,0.00090578274,0.000654566,0.00045218342,0.00035070453,0.23947886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9475297,0.002296409,0.045576204,0.00042557315,0.00015089381,0.00045546956,0.00006900126,0.000063391984,0.0034333155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98058164,0.010518288,0.0013092187,0.0013260221,0.0056291698,0.00063568103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90401924,0.07577891,0.0070975823,0.004484785,0.0076170913,0.0010024278],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019564,0.00058828853,0.00090527657,0.025510283,0.008062934,0.014742065,0.0020469413,0.0026245173,0.0033014147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.081370465,0.0004585679,0.0011312427,0.023084259,0.027341746,0.018822538,0.0049986355,0.002132286,0.00035548775],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003645408,0.000029294748,0.009265834,0.0004148948,0.000023200722,0.00018498227,0.026482217,0.0007818593,0.00036673638,0.9181616,0.0011555286,0.04309738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019649851,0.00007082246,0.0056184335,0.00053608674,0.00003662868,0.00056031725,0.028178887,0.0041337097,0.000769274,0.9283391,0.03168252,0.000054608383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003992525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039208136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.980436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011389466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007812081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10346556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947696923","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2018-0143","title":"Emerging practices for managing user misconduct in online news media comments sections","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Originality; Public relations; Narrative; Value (mathematics); Misconduct; Sociology; Journalism; Work (physics); User-generated content; Social media; Knowledge management; Political science; Creativity; Psychology; World Wide Web; Computer science; Media studies; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.06653161152201145,"score_gpt":0.4472581973129245,"score_spread":0.380726585790913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947696923","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9130878,0.0011592914,0.029688155,0.0105893,0.00020333238,0.00024125073,0.000069146394,0.00029280645,0.044668864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99065936,0.00029119285,0.006077819,0.00036273335,0.00005380704,0.00004346905,0.000025226622,0.000061576924,0.0024247703],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9498479,0.037432786,0.002160949,0.0021927943,0.0066924593,0.0016731324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82153904,0.12413082,0.017883446,0.014218623,0.018351572,0.0038765247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0294159,0.00048857334,0.00025817964,0.0035649643,0.010671825,0.0108608585,0.002409776,0.002576266,0.0018722481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10175944,0.00058696145,0.00037841868,0.0017973097,0.014053482,0.008656802,0.005590336,0.0030958196,0.00056865124],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044061937,0.00008413912,0.022952987,0.00020478424,0.000017050266,0.001201649,0.9179095,0.00010584586,0.0028716885,0.009228687,0.001137193,0.04424242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010506154,0.00012409409,0.015641423,0.0004895948,0.000027335323,0.0021419688,0.9204872,0.0010808924,0.0034004669,0.0077642845,0.048763473,0.000068833026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029723267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006172536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0294159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035241286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005634236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15556806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954119398","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2018-0184","title":"Mitigating risk: mediating transition through the enactment of information literacy practices","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge","keywords":"Grounded theory; Information literacy; Context (archaeology); Originality; Sociology; Literacy; Qualitative research; Constructivist grounded theory; Social constructivism; Pedagogy; Knowledge management; Public relations; Social science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.041681115129757376,"score_gpt":0.416762787159714,"score_spread":0.3750816720299566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954119398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84242046,0.0013254314,0.049139984,0.012737872,0.00014868303,0.00026603753,0.000054049982,0.0002437201,0.09366369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99193925,0.00030654098,0.005480435,0.00030883652,0.000014270327,0.000053043856,0.000014831123,0.000022291879,0.0018605022],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883189,0.008760868,0.00038486067,0.00063357357,0.0010621496,0.00083962356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745164,0.018385237,0.0021126664,0.002137566,0.0011341857,0.0017139623],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010981913,0.0004138732,0.00030190338,0.0016254591,0.0050146123,0.009775453,0.0012153236,0.0015453794,0.00368503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028570205,0.0002880127,0.0005042521,0.0010330206,0.015504375,0.008408532,0.010258091,0.002339941,0.0004944123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053429012,0.00016189745,0.011438584,0.0002680513,0.000015581223,0.0010342516,0.8959513,0.00023110572,0.0014605114,0.03797926,0.0006927373,0.050713267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003046376,0.00040346148,0.0147813065,0.0013805266,0.00006675469,0.0013682584,0.8071914,0.0010702263,0.0037052636,0.06346336,0.10647507,0.00006385517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025498765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020257921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99022454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025311739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061924704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058078647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956110834","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2018-0172","title":"The reading background of Goodreads book club members: a female fiction canon?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Themes in Literature Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Theme (computing); Reading (process); Originality; Value (mathematics); Literature; History; Psychology; Sociology; Art; Computer science; Social science; Linguistics; World Wide Web; Medicine; Qualitative research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014484140758376873,"score_gpt":0.2728159470650433,"score_spread":0.2583318063066664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956110834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9369466,0.004681858,0.00030162302,0.01167831,0.00054491695,0.00004153315,0.00021438573,0.000023032047,0.0455677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706242,0.0014376584,0.00016238872,0.0021947834,0.00043670187,0.00003777237,0.00010834787,0.000038937218,0.024959266],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990049,0.00046542156,0.00002143682,0.00015056567,0.0002003903,0.0001573189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99579984,0.0022831578,0.00054514525,0.00014308341,0.0003302392,0.0008985963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001181179,0.00020715772,0.00038425782,0.0011765967,0.0030916696,0.0032899838,0.00052064704,0.0007188212,0.016492622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057965387,0.0001511546,0.00014468361,0.0009881877,0.0023172935,0.0018638453,0.0016245912,0.0009940809,0.0023950075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002793246,0.00035897916,0.16549109,0.00061286805,0.00003943899,0.00541002,0.67071617,0.00004123143,0.001027637,0.005205078,0.05302134,0.09779688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014194854,0.00032103312,0.14952008,0.0008047944,0.000029208868,0.0051251943,0.7231797,0.000111400586,0.0006361881,0.0016827367,0.11853077,0.000044660876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045094676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011840538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016492622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011336273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077384786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055173337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963526428","doi":"10.1108/jd-12-2018-0211","title":"Maturing research data services and the transformation of academic libraries","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Research Data Management Practices","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"RDM; Originality; Capability Maturity Model; Service (business); Maturity (psychological); Data science; Knowledge management; Computer science; Transformational leadership; Scholarly communication; Public relations; Political science; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Publishing; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.13758351398406676,"score_gpt":0.4348543227040539,"score_spread":0.2972708087199871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963526428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5821649,0.012714177,0.05785832,0.20126086,0.00067581935,0.0012990292,0.0011354927,0.0016798547,0.1412116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93975383,0.003505998,0.043459903,0.004037092,0.00019244317,0.00028420595,0.0005415676,0.00017127974,0.008053763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92250484,0.044169966,0.008327573,0.0032037846,0.015795643,0.005998217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73257864,0.109416306,0.033163708,0.020225454,0.059012838,0.045603048],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0884532,0.0005323721,0.00052235724,0.009497727,0.0063610473,0.030603206,0.0034104136,0.0035234136,0.0060471036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14740084,0.00084665,0.0011004522,0.015989652,0.010471527,0.029683637,0.019164158,0.0048937905,0.002825254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020910168,0.000420126,0.08778056,0.0024108256,0.000065801345,0.0010257687,0.1186832,0.0016401542,0.0020823784,0.16925742,0.016662562,0.5997622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005898419,0.0006026258,0.08563637,0.0029667588,0.000046335295,0.002207259,0.25021744,0.006228042,0.00407227,0.09697418,0.550638,0.00035166397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016725998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009582637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96939677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026523266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059040297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46779084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978591550","doi":"10.1108/jd-12-2018-0209","title":"Disinformation and misinformation triangle","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; Misinformation; Social media; Internet privacy; Context (archaeology); Media literacy; Computer science; Digital media; Sociology; Data science; Public relations; Political science; World Wide Web; Computer security; Media studies","score_opus":0.008770396463127923,"score_gpt":0.320689587587003,"score_spread":0.31191919112387506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978591550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14128739,0.039280325,0.26242644,0.1863807,0.0025015683,0.0005206432,0.000414045,0.00040568196,0.36678323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578945,0.011247035,0.014319375,0.006306359,0.0010125368,0.00021218014,0.000081490114,0.0000526922,0.008873808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875565,0.006595882,0.00062260736,0.0012265274,0.0034040767,0.00059439865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94995147,0.034191962,0.006566511,0.00446998,0.0036955513,0.0011245412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008888104,0.00086252106,0.00071137137,0.0055630757,0.0028491388,0.010274273,0.0015807458,0.003999727,0.00482985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02746868,0.00040956354,0.0006536788,0.0030019989,0.028503586,0.016771818,0.0068409913,0.0056084725,0.00087343255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003398162,0.000038009046,0.003224419,0.00029925382,0.000021554886,0.00038250335,0.005961516,0.00073645613,0.00022801165,0.96522754,0.0018692061,0.021977626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021244952,0.00009997781,0.0025024056,0.0010352512,0.000055392637,0.0016233855,0.009978927,0.003910061,0.00087739207,0.8939165,0.08592804,0.000051487834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019146092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010331735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010274273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040282514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004931668,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047005355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2988841194","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2019-0055","title":"Conceptualizing information work for health contexts in Library and Information Science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Affordance; Information behavior; Information science; Work (physics); Originality; Invisibility; Sociology; Computer science; Personal information management; Scholarship; Information system; Knowledge management; Data science; Dichotomy; Value (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Management information systems; Social science; Human–computer interaction; Library science; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.013715434204117503,"score_gpt":0.33794754506492564,"score_spread":0.3242321108608081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2988841194","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14481893,0.04494955,0.13151978,0.14435789,0.0015718796,0.0003524754,0.00033263193,0.00043823788,0.5316587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960623,0.006636973,0.020909583,0.0029051874,0.0005407148,0.00024074124,0.00010433132,0.00009067713,0.007948714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720705,0.022570072,0.0012271896,0.00092825684,0.0019050337,0.0012989101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531377,0.03752322,0.0022630303,0.003242425,0.0015785289,0.0022550074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021268396,0.0007330337,0.00072138675,0.011195607,0.012917262,0.031300914,0.002538277,0.006033256,0.0068392707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019275041,0.000496048,0.0009863413,0.010853045,0.0819577,0.02484721,0.017034559,0.004554319,0.0010081049],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024024017,0.000035064983,0.0013379959,0.00034287956,0.000006533155,0.00026568805,0.18226627,0.00018684079,0.00011408491,0.8017384,0.0014821151,0.0122001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029247532,0.000071427734,0.0018288819,0.0021558376,0.00003086746,0.0008656428,0.261463,0.0008949314,0.00041736738,0.49784297,0.23434635,0.000053499854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056351256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039700666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031300914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012074057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012279636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11247939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3007649223","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2019-0067","title":"The red thread of information","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"BATES; Information science; Originality; Computer science; Information literacy; Epistemology; Sociology; Social science; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Library science","score_opus":0.016151039477205413,"score_gpt":0.2646027759344889,"score_spread":0.24845173645728347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3007649223","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039836783,0.029820649,0.14458227,0.19366227,0.011887774,0.0005138298,0.00058162777,0.00073191494,0.5783829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8722169,0.0095614735,0.04159438,0.02938472,0.0030898491,0.000555934,0.00022470567,0.00065699255,0.04271506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762325,0.0135087175,0.0010295068,0.0028281037,0.005063946,0.0013371928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945382,0.031253483,0.0034124195,0.013554438,0.004066448,0.0023311682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02123892,0.00078573776,0.0009118588,0.0042886315,0.009663598,0.029956102,0.0020469888,0.004732585,0.013305239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044287007,0.00065596227,0.0010126252,0.005264494,0.06205793,0.042175766,0.014361862,0.008002449,0.0030269786],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028731802,0.0000123173895,0.00035092945,0.00024042738,0.000007939527,0.00007927871,0.022496099,0.00005955883,0.00022237614,0.9507153,0.007967417,0.017819544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012114676,0.00004759786,0.0005696764,0.0014519932,0.000021085256,0.00031463758,0.02075543,0.00034166357,0.00052620366,0.5083314,0.46759954,0.000028559925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002819608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016162136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029956102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007376505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0092597725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11232352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011107083","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2019-0076","title":"Information and contemplation: a call for reflection and action","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Meditation; Originality; Epistemology; Wonder; Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Social science; Philosophy; Qualitative research; Theology","score_opus":0.07026668982467237,"score_gpt":0.4162822061813308,"score_spread":0.34601551635665845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011107083","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01884234,0.025515312,0.05036248,0.85724574,0.0068666884,0.0005177468,0.00007858535,0.0004033828,0.04016781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6954584,0.03753972,0.090550356,0.15322962,0.0047181626,0.0024456389,0.00021201473,0.00093401223,0.014912179],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8300165,0.14264035,0.00393638,0.006938467,0.010671544,0.00579672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7397378,0.20412138,0.00706865,0.019724607,0.012245745,0.017101942],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14194363,0.0024531854,0.00326819,0.00560884,0.02344116,0.041362725,0.008435945,0.020579519,0.006049535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11268933,0.0015174884,0.0028018702,0.0033793044,0.1581918,0.06934863,0.03474425,0.05832359,0.0019497158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039525457,0.0001317906,0.0006352047,0.00061330426,0.000027581615,0.0006014619,0.74513,0.00017382414,0.00054901605,0.19142772,0.02524862,0.03542193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028386496,0.00007936159,0.0004625632,0.0039470647,0.000019253313,0.0006667316,0.5060586,0.00028498683,0.0004605406,0.22199176,0.26588517,0.000115590854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00436844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038351477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14194363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014395049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03690388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75067866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016068426","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2019-0187","title":"Unbundling practice: the unbundling of big deal journal packages as an information practice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Unbundling; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Big data; Practice theory; Originality; Computer science; Data science; Management science; Social science; World Wide Web; Engineering; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.018029159177375586,"score_gpt":0.284386201754067,"score_spread":0.2663570425766914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016068426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49253616,0.004004389,0.24446781,0.045442484,0.0005732446,0.0013947164,0.000150885,0.00085231784,0.21057796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9249828,0.0009198918,0.06361443,0.0015065735,0.00023759155,0.00042937853,0.00006486706,0.00017978533,0.008064684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9289318,0.04839521,0.0034641165,0.0041937064,0.012944416,0.0020708083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7970362,0.116524816,0.025411071,0.03645749,0.01474215,0.0098283645],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048587054,0.00048096039,0.0006146972,0.0070299865,0.009696294,0.024645068,0.0026109696,0.0034235497,0.0069857445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11493481,0.0008968765,0.00073008373,0.0071501685,0.03148597,0.026127515,0.011609573,0.0036965248,0.0015591445],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001548288,0.00046030123,0.023576573,0.0007182443,0.000059414444,0.0006525733,0.17992184,0.0008109882,0.0025801482,0.57182807,0.0067756562,0.21246134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010550211,0.0008331805,0.024282536,0.0020824187,0.000103135055,0.0024489234,0.18015689,0.005443602,0.004572559,0.4113846,0.36834678,0.0002398945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012576908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001166563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072933743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010641355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25695598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3102117701","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2020-0137","title":"Information experiences of Bangladeshi immigrants in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Settlement (finance); Descriptive statistics; Ethnic group; Refugee; Sociology; Personally identifiable information; Public relations; Geography; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.015599122079842823,"score_gpt":0.3007575732186039,"score_spread":0.2851584511387611,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3102117701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839198,0.0006868319,0.00007949549,0.0018869415,0.000039503157,0.00004830081,0.0003490314,0.000011502883,0.012978614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902892,0.0015820903,0.00017266122,0.00077887217,0.000012148634,0.00003607845,0.00025404085,0.0000141832925,0.00686067],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848783,0.00033442868,0.000079954385,0.00011951221,0.0003960591,0.0005822425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954667,0.0010922499,0.00042992446,0.000117944306,0.0013748296,0.00151832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013686357,0.00040825031,0.00047452917,0.001209577,0.018012455,0.0066136727,0.00089000457,0.0009227959,0.006152412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052642,0.0002558737,0.00023654662,0.0034504856,0.004855551,0.0016020698,0.005159623,0.0015978203,0.00057216064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006778076,0.00003390944,0.023615401,0.0001240642,0.000007130134,0.001813794,0.9600262,0.00003483163,0.000603452,0.0008251653,0.0022579639,0.010590391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002691421,0.000024418128,0.00755574,0.0000816065,0.0000047674857,0.00015948243,0.97821313,0.00001894476,0.000073613686,0.000048229267,0.0137994345,0.000017980177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9215973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9417329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0784027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02626019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04403852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19053191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112453499","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2020-0034","title":"Organizing personal digital information: an analysis of faculty member activities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Personal information management; Knowledge management; Originality; Personally identifiable information; Apprehension; Information literacy; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Information system; Public relations; Pedagogy; Computer science; Management information systems; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.24437275792586696,"score_gpt":0.45034288393518535,"score_spread":0.20597012600931838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112453499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98538613,0.00023683782,0.0058422512,0.0002591135,0.000009426963,0.00010973648,0.00018760232,0.0000855701,0.0078832945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911963,0.0002147728,0.006541134,0.000038370676,0.000012806623,0.000078627665,0.00019230254,0.000022889113,0.0017028201],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612075,0.0019729424,0.00032051283,0.00032040832,0.00089890393,0.00036646397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783084,0.0139353825,0.002738172,0.0014824165,0.002539561,0.000995989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004522782,0.00019819988,0.0002135945,0.0044207117,0.0019059569,0.002456884,0.0005669419,0.00039642325,0.002601423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016741555,0.00014943318,0.00025495392,0.004816182,0.0009678759,0.0019240241,0.0016677363,0.0004102028,0.0005281216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000228824,0.0003353505,0.2834554,0.0004832991,0.000043990807,0.0005569443,0.28343162,0.0005400579,0.005902085,0.0027346078,0.0020498617,0.42023793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016081702,0.00040341445,0.4168045,0.00038473654,0.000058461235,0.0015441586,0.508819,0.0034257623,0.009420036,0.0026020054,0.05644163,0.000080288206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00239872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033923376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004522782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014958597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020199644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023919046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127942799","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2020-0051","title":"Perceptions and experiences of virtual reality in public libraries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Media, Religion, Digital Communication","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Sociology; Conversation; Virtual reality; Public relations; Situated; Mainstream; Sociotechnical system; Perception; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Psychology; Knowledge management; Social science; Qualitative research; Political science; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.06022043366209056,"score_gpt":0.30262285681894496,"score_spread":0.2424024231568544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127942799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852786,0.00064312527,0.0007506566,0.0011705571,0.000014660324,0.00001560646,0.000034512588,0.000047866517,0.012044332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977271,0.00025736514,0.00013170586,0.0002132088,0.000012871447,0.000011780017,0.000013243871,0.000009721476,0.0016230453],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944661,0.0040794085,0.00017655586,0.00018487373,0.0005174953,0.00057563145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992097,0.00460572,0.0013338419,0.00038839792,0.00055999885,0.0010150693],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003162374,0.00026415524,0.00044496066,0.0015283638,0.0041810684,0.0091003105,0.0006451467,0.001124399,0.007907606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010404882,0.00035847438,0.00038505704,0.0013478878,0.0043821246,0.0051332926,0.0060236473,0.0011283669,0.00078487827],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016057795,0.00012759362,0.021027755,0.00023457767,0.00001724146,0.0006721042,0.9488107,0.000097981254,0.00094364485,0.002735518,0.0015767294,0.023595687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000849741,0.00020976157,0.017434822,0.00019292213,0.000021126254,0.00061227556,0.9612704,0.00013940842,0.0002795817,0.0005495586,0.01923862,0.00004304555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006257475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058405697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0091003105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021981262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013715448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026453555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133689386","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2020-0185","title":"The image of the library through the eyes of immigrant and migrant readers","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Typology; Immigration; Sociocultural evolution; Sociology; Perception; Qualitative research; Psychology; Political science; Social science; Anthropology; Law","score_opus":0.015877510298866544,"score_gpt":0.30933186191507805,"score_spread":0.29345435161621153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133689386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919803,0.00060685765,0.00012714873,0.0009864556,0.000019127036,0.000009856201,0.00002454293,0.000011835361,0.006233893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997442,0.0004293953,0.000073478455,0.0003672417,0.000015392907,0.0000099628705,0.000009759369,0.00000821074,0.001644571],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882406,0.0007612258,0.00003744132,0.00008299895,0.00013400326,0.00016035797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963444,0.0018886918,0.000629893,0.00019542068,0.0006456437,0.0002960068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002352334,0.00027762516,0.00041699267,0.0015760844,0.004966221,0.00561056,0.000617752,0.00088202755,0.004356928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007911105,0.00019467108,0.0003521132,0.0013566698,0.004201809,0.0033783861,0.0030272177,0.001090082,0.00054148515],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079638245,0.000019544072,0.019059002,0.000104537045,0.000009970252,0.00091306085,0.9667323,0.000017446217,0.0005339688,0.0005508279,0.00091039896,0.011069283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017340606,0.000043544813,0.0095994165,0.00007199711,0.000008332863,0.0003332603,0.9862298,0.000015829788,0.00014703104,0.00012577587,0.0034137527,0.000009529133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035405803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041869372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035405803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002456579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016541146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07039946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3158340182","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2021-0039","title":"Mapping knowledge domains on Wikipedia: an author bibliographic coupling analysis of traditional Chinese medicine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliographic coupling; Computer science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Information retrieval; Domain knowledge; Traditional Chinese medicine; Traditional medicine; Citation; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.053348840413957654,"score_gpt":0.4173004327378051,"score_spread":0.36395159232384744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3158340182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503337,0.00092541403,0.030032441,0.00025506472,0.000040783354,0.00034218596,0.0040824893,0.00025489327,0.013732921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96153265,0.00048574683,0.032346785,0.000028701004,0.00002122294,0.00030594936,0.003792851,0.00006456821,0.0014214263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973726,0.00092390575,0.00037029362,0.00042918161,0.0007917705,0.00011235736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98332846,0.009903538,0.0021612705,0.00096371927,0.0032524255,0.0003906431],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023235914,0.00033863593,0.00034987126,0.020440482,0.0010117943,0.0020924131,0.00040457558,0.00031047728,0.0030312513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023401488,0.0001950516,0.0006544911,0.022247693,0.00051595917,0.0024612446,0.0023203914,0.00033663702,0.00037490283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025506402,0.00017976048,0.6650816,0.0020053587,0.0007414113,0.00079052005,0.023384796,0.0047532907,0.006790656,0.01148938,0.004490568,0.2800376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003621032,0.00018324397,0.8660021,0.00057776866,0.00076324074,0.0009080955,0.025846055,0.05197507,0.0069865556,0.015338054,0.031269025,0.000114646544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0084776245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077834046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99767643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012090782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015002455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016856551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174350654","doi":"10.1108/jd-01-2021-0018","title":"Do they practice what they preach? The presence of problematic citations in business ethics research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Business ethics; Originality; Minor (academic); Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Research ethics; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1400330230487862,"score_gpt":0.48422085709694807,"score_spread":0.3441878340481619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174350654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6834683,0.03342459,0.02196718,0.1796557,0.00375812,0.0003577874,0.00023480265,0.00024106607,0.07689241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637232,0.008848905,0.0067149773,0.014024789,0.0011211798,0.00019850476,0.00008336264,0.00012728813,0.0051578223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8845047,0.064721614,0.010096456,0.0066083535,0.030539148,0.003529761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42852804,0.33885533,0.12324721,0.031718425,0.0642147,0.013436338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077556945,0.00037225834,0.00088171114,0.010629539,0.007975863,0.013253555,0.0022117526,0.0064053927,0.0050542066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48674437,0.00075281813,0.0006043524,0.011398038,0.015981004,0.017255548,0.00776462,0.004380583,0.0016553064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022086565,0.00023842392,0.26199207,0.0021768338,0.00030678842,0.0028920644,0.31148228,0.00035545393,0.0010659957,0.088794105,0.024168953,0.3063061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011844505,0.00038085578,0.12481586,0.008577968,0.00027345543,0.0053614522,0.36378708,0.0013256307,0.0016761346,0.24305981,0.2503411,0.00028215212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032170024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052637253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98937047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049951267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011226185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41016525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179213823","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2020-0183","title":"A thematic analysis of library association policies on services to persons with disabilities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Professional association; Thematic analysis; Context (archaeology); Public relations; Library science; Accreditation; Political science; Originality; Sociology; Law; Qualitative research; Computer science; Social science","score_opus":0.016201255122726403,"score_gpt":0.3316751737871444,"score_spread":0.315473918664418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179213823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87527,0.0018545382,0.013942079,0.022090668,0.00034277106,0.0017890772,0.0019272472,0.0000920505,0.08269154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9783198,0.0019435819,0.006915883,0.0019876254,0.000086486056,0.0019002652,0.0010123309,0.00012222338,0.0077116606],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96735436,0.021916403,0.002078991,0.0011263367,0.0051155174,0.0024084323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9025639,0.07572152,0.005538473,0.0025238858,0.01152002,0.0021321133],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047783058,0.0003658231,0.00067505013,0.009503098,0.01325802,0.007004718,0.0021875168,0.0017508327,0.0034983782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0734269,0.0004045611,0.00053969386,0.017054547,0.011830423,0.006897708,0.0077431253,0.0026930536,0.0003162014],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022195638,0.000026198188,0.003982644,0.00037827794,0.0000066826306,0.00026634932,0.9603742,0.00010761711,0.00029528385,0.019395731,0.0031340404,0.012010888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023582222,0.000007742008,0.003746979,0.0005662727,0.0000047276144,0.00005946528,0.96229154,0.00017390448,0.00017896577,0.0016525155,0.031307086,0.00000835361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049160667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03679311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99299526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03209227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038286358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25270402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180934268","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2021-0024","title":"“So many things were new to us”: identifying the settlement information practices of newcomers to Canada across the settlement process","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Originality; Process (computing); Public relations; Information needs; Sociology; Information system; Knowledge management; Political science; Business; Library science; Qualitative research; Social science; Computer science; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.032324191481344966,"score_gpt":0.39291376708585923,"score_spread":0.36058957560451427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180934268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98790133,0.00054611353,0.0006179009,0.0019263644,0.0000262009,0.00008068006,0.00014310711,0.000019309846,0.00873902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99465734,0.0006378372,0.0007522981,0.00029996914,0.000005375696,0.000039018625,0.00010608173,0.00001807726,0.0034839564],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689686,0.0009964714,0.000115342,0.00029698666,0.00068651786,0.0010077512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99196553,0.002208078,0.001009789,0.00037186872,0.0025053727,0.001939354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004437823,0.00033268167,0.00041413447,0.002265613,0.020368107,0.009208147,0.0016734367,0.00083884463,0.003926298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012283968,0.00034920033,0.00026018545,0.0045369305,0.00954183,0.003082366,0.006107627,0.0016468993,0.0002988871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003343388,0.000016033431,0.02511061,0.00007491402,0.0000050209424,0.0005762237,0.95724905,0.00003962277,0.00033018834,0.0007603669,0.0010165562,0.014787935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011805805,0.000009776148,0.01362754,0.00005599525,0.0000035995595,0.000065242886,0.9788638,0.00004224926,0.00009530946,0.000069842106,0.0071539828,0.000011506128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94208324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97217065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05791676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03686387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07176177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26746738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181891334","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2020-0149","title":"Sharing experiential information in online discussion: the case of coping with the COVID-19 epidemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Psychology; Originality; Cognition; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.04049234714435527,"score_gpt":0.3995205792643016,"score_spread":0.35902823211994633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181891334","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9370552,0.0006580746,0.01243885,0.01337602,0.00027643942,0.00036031415,0.00008316269,0.00009827747,0.03565368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916946,0.00027402642,0.00389342,0.0009282486,0.00013846254,0.00021716734,0.00004038195,0.000040069757,0.0027736037],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9537352,0.039224137,0.00071496057,0.0012940993,0.002322066,0.002709583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9066544,0.07616614,0.005670403,0.0031386816,0.0022240418,0.0061463895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0254566,0.0010469436,0.0006300582,0.0025952775,0.024931071,0.01012771,0.0038481606,0.0072202636,0.0056963144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05558251,0.0006259364,0.0007879265,0.002334484,0.019531334,0.012241529,0.013540363,0.0062204464,0.00068562495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009025629,0.000109676876,0.0030019311,0.00014887105,0.000010686716,0.0050315238,0.9749043,0.0001167168,0.0006102159,0.007483637,0.00091076456,0.0075814184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022327118,0.00008420856,0.0020832887,0.0002363465,0.000013914774,0.0019315968,0.9620545,0.00070411817,0.0003898037,0.0056618294,0.026773972,0.00004409729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047579627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007188865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0254566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071896277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004933002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13462895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3193846972","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2021-0049","title":"Wikipedia: an unexplored resource for understanding consumer health information behaviour in library and information science scholarship","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Scholarship; Computer science; Medical library; Information seeking; Information behavior; Sociology; Conceptual framework; Relation (database); Layperson; Conceptual model; Situated; Knowledge management; Data science; Social science; Information retrieval; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.04485993649630779,"score_gpt":0.37975557348266603,"score_spread":0.33489563698635827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3193846972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61473966,0.038113922,0.028928611,0.10296052,0.000806747,0.00023793058,0.000859814,0.0002573897,0.21309537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97979933,0.00748381,0.0055849906,0.0030763433,0.0002747422,0.00011376648,0.00018199121,0.000041133448,0.0034438283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546,0.003403813,0.0002435403,0.00022886592,0.00051090494,0.0001529937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9531183,0.03844941,0.0030243804,0.0015437378,0.0020848592,0.0017792985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061588557,0.00021835072,0.00041247378,0.005401185,0.0030709375,0.008874723,0.00083738676,0.0014778367,0.0045900624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022761246,0.0001997737,0.00026779642,0.0047189873,0.009599674,0.016091645,0.0038177879,0.001203004,0.00044369252],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009123107,0.00026915144,0.05277522,0.0028318216,0.000069751986,0.00078218296,0.3248023,0.00063250685,0.00065919134,0.45896456,0.016055921,0.14206623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026961558,0.000147925,0.033718724,0.0050099497,0.00008711302,0.0007005769,0.40013626,0.004275136,0.00082140206,0.25531986,0.29965284,0.00010317438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005544998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071242815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008874723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003023468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045288573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032571554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194625426","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2021-0041","title":"Preservation for diverse users: digital preservation and the “Designated Community” at the Ontario Jewish Archives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital preservation; Identification (biology); Context (archaeology); Computer science; World Wide Web; Originality; USable; Conversation; Digital library; Sociology; Qualitative research; History","score_opus":0.052874292588095395,"score_gpt":0.2384055915849584,"score_spread":0.185531298996863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194625426","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7176062,0.0026299441,0.009310579,0.044348523,0.00022753206,0.00027013334,0.0000889853,0.00010820678,0.22540998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882086,0.0003821664,0.0018899684,0.00064838614,0.000015095814,0.000048328995,0.000011052679,0.000014172931,0.008782303],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99238455,0.004354604,0.00023050094,0.00042890388,0.0016172815,0.0009841734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98996526,0.0035963764,0.0010684682,0.0010629159,0.0021172503,0.002189732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008697423,0.00021012439,0.0002287142,0.001729607,0.038507953,0.0106882,0.0018779088,0.0016076326,0.006008592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01262587,0.00026799258,0.0001977644,0.0024017638,0.030919716,0.005200985,0.011587785,0.0016018488,0.00028391287],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008142064,0.000069644695,0.021245664,0.00020411641,0.000009874638,0.001184316,0.67666644,0.00017764358,0.0010688369,0.21809436,0.0082738735,0.07292377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018366132,0.00006407959,0.02218806,0.00048420884,0.00002129897,0.0004717731,0.7706504,0.00035696512,0.00080250995,0.017332787,0.18755707,0.000052533484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5711914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8219973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42880863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048872806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07274544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8626679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197846497","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0119","title":"Intellectual structure of information science 2011–2020: an author co-citation analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Co-citation; Citation; Dominance (genetics); Specialty; Information science; Computer science; Citation analysis; Field (mathematics); Data science; Web of science; Library science; Information retrieval; Psychology; MEDLINE; Political science; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.286229173528639,"score_gpt":0.5805644529410221,"score_spread":0.2943352794123831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197846497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9273605,0.006758481,0.0036677548,0.0017674221,0.00019496537,0.00019883308,0.024665702,0.00017651691,0.0352098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97907215,0.0017228216,0.0030543657,0.000047157322,0.00018015566,0.00010863394,0.013858028,0.00004586442,0.0019107725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951434,0.000561543,0.0006832162,0.00054997817,0.0025963925,0.00046557566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771277,0.0077961967,0.0058609955,0.0013296774,0.0068305503,0.001054999],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059396387,0.00043556435,0.0005633171,0.053413972,0.0010955328,0.005485631,0.0006533603,0.00051582983,0.0033779524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026670573,0.00014589791,0.0010073852,0.0709356,0.0009428639,0.0034729524,0.0026147484,0.0007279727,0.00082150596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018628141,0.00010413705,0.82093966,0.00077495136,0.00039027436,0.00033942307,0.0045816223,0.00393235,0.0008055245,0.012910302,0.0088662775,0.14616925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013554853,0.00011789185,0.9466755,0.00036325006,0.00013269027,0.00039888936,0.0045614676,0.008166967,0.0009348965,0.0042847707,0.03430618,0.000043935735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016386755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012338633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040670866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052425954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03258276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202319391","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2020-0200","title":"Reading time: exploring the temporal experiences of reading","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Reading (process); Conversation; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Originality; Value (mathematics); Bricolage; Everyday life; Sociology; Linguistics; Visual arts; Epistemology; Qualitative research; Art; History; Social science; Communication; Political science","score_opus":0.0519408331053108,"score_gpt":0.3499105937891513,"score_spread":0.2979697606838405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202319391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9118169,0.002707977,0.008397844,0.0024248166,0.000080802674,0.00003520332,0.00010329419,0.000058845715,0.07437438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966497,0.00048065974,0.0008408721,0.00010601622,0.000018580722,0.000022416692,0.000023083563,0.000023098031,0.0018355558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973792,0.0019342738,0.00007955773,0.00020400193,0.00021588117,0.00018707957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99097,0.006585949,0.0011971276,0.0004185537,0.0004368629,0.0003914009],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00275658,0.00022060488,0.00031497623,0.0016756337,0.0030533688,0.0067548743,0.0007150692,0.0008729085,0.004660579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011528943,0.0002573063,0.00028308955,0.0015747014,0.009160827,0.008207224,0.0048595294,0.0014606884,0.00031426235],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071608185,0.000015957601,0.005245186,0.00012326075,0.000009410658,0.00048748252,0.9641939,0.000043036118,0.00071769324,0.018588984,0.000374045,0.010129455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008838438,0.0000935026,0.015280668,0.00026119026,0.000027607543,0.0007058327,0.93754417,0.00018908734,0.00055640243,0.01446236,0.030838327,0.000032052078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036937268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049726414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067548743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018297796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001022302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015591204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203741099","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2020-0196","title":"Documenting multiple temporalities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Innovative Human-Technology Interaction","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Situated; Variety (cybernetics); Originality; Temporality; Indexicality; Articulation (sociology); Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Computer science; Epistemology; Social science; Politics; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.017727519178310135,"score_gpt":0.2991930271499754,"score_spread":0.2814655079716653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203741099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34552705,0.008987717,0.33939838,0.011288539,0.0015658184,0.00046326264,0.0007448688,0.0012414949,0.2907829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89081025,0.002427011,0.077066496,0.00043443838,0.00024102823,0.0001992898,0.0003221051,0.00044885004,0.02805056],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919933,0.003885468,0.0005153615,0.0011042035,0.0018755042,0.0006261266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97494125,0.011760937,0.0036006009,0.005597367,0.0026972606,0.0014026337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009827424,0.0007809343,0.00045115643,0.00472034,0.008799024,0.012466074,0.0020284988,0.0012456973,0.0071189073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02384349,0.000607466,0.00064126693,0.0041250437,0.019517967,0.013277985,0.010022297,0.00221376,0.00080797274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017985363,0.000036248144,0.008008596,0.00067044335,0.000034246405,0.0012036981,0.54113114,0.000718019,0.005162366,0.26450717,0.0061327335,0.17221552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025720383,0.00009093189,0.0055012824,0.0015655145,0.00008704388,0.0016842105,0.23825096,0.0015265573,0.0048877886,0.07417661,0.6720858,0.000117635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024760151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030371714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024760151,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006336603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009258906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051972985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205881137","doi":"10.1108/jd-03-2021-0047","title":"“Bouncing ideas” as a complex information practice: information seeking, sharing, creation, and cooperation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Retrieval and Search Behavior","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Information seeking; Knowledge management; Computer science; Metaphor; Sociology; Information science; Information needs; Component (thermodynamics); Information mapping; Information system; Coding (social sciences); Work (physics); Data science; Qualitative research; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Management information systems; Personal information management; Social science","score_opus":0.014095837705976876,"score_gpt":0.32216829974470584,"score_spread":0.30807246203872896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205881137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6272029,0.0097099915,0.17486998,0.030969635,0.0006829594,0.0010347854,0.00011094034,0.00034701888,0.15507178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688172,0.0015208112,0.024944585,0.00086167705,0.00007896101,0.00027789557,0.000034028497,0.0000668057,0.0033979823],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9384088,0.048514277,0.0018756739,0.0023683351,0.0066730483,0.002159806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91394055,0.0636835,0.008092153,0.007653252,0.0031430188,0.0034874722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043166798,0.0007999937,0.00083449326,0.0058453754,0.010788363,0.023167161,0.0026350054,0.004696036,0.002600927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045953497,0.00085673213,0.0009332418,0.007773432,0.07847742,0.025200102,0.015822489,0.0068772873,0.00046926917],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005142382,0.00006078329,0.0032505924,0.00037889733,0.000016410588,0.0005700902,0.77045614,0.00021499727,0.00091383466,0.1992552,0.0007772741,0.024054341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004451213,0.00018800328,0.0051355837,0.0013994748,0.000050958803,0.0019492893,0.647995,0.0017529757,0.0012579985,0.21370108,0.12637816,0.00014700012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023484486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017694085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043166798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006964637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009830371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22829062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206912697","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2020-0194","title":"Spatial thinking, gender and immaterial affective labour in the post-Fordist academic library","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Fordism; Originality; Sociology; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Service (business); Function (biology); Knowledge economy; Social science; Epistemology; Public relations; Political science; Economics; Computer science; Economy; Engineering","score_opus":0.01615066971383596,"score_gpt":0.3219319764758128,"score_spread":0.30578130676197685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206912697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66843396,0.008698364,0.005669593,0.02543325,0.00029357034,0.000032703523,0.000058463796,0.000056625573,0.29132348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99321955,0.00092158874,0.00030968047,0.00046571926,0.000043433058,0.000013552304,0.0000051912634,0.000010388593,0.005010928],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553573,0.0027986318,0.00014584314,0.00029707572,0.0005948079,0.0006279117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99297523,0.0041000126,0.0010788243,0.00033308065,0.0007312493,0.00078152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007078891,0.00033520663,0.00036492335,0.003369886,0.013163264,0.01766172,0.00094700756,0.0012848483,0.0055746203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063732527,0.00022297607,0.00027153414,0.0037147875,0.056386683,0.010031397,0.008218212,0.0017159929,0.0005523128],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051643616,0.000033081335,0.0049458984,0.00013669959,0.0000052325904,0.00035293758,0.6308554,0.00010831147,0.00018700698,0.34019697,0.0016513803,0.021475483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007959885,0.000035843488,0.0062528998,0.00021311562,0.000008824934,0.00033982584,0.83329564,0.0001083771,0.00037091892,0.07051491,0.08882268,0.000029082248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016726429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022475783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018293217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018293217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009240728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1327272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217700596","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2021-0117","title":"Versioning boundary objects: the citation profile of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders (DSM)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Object (grammar); Originality; Software versioning; Boundary object; Citation; Boundary (topology); Data science; Discipline; Information retrieval; Scheme (mathematics); Mental mapping; Epistemology; World Wide Web; Sociology; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Social science; Mathematics; Software","score_opus":0.18428457107534696,"score_gpt":0.5296834151563714,"score_spread":0.34539884408102445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217700596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63114893,0.04814009,0.1308945,0.046538543,0.003703584,0.0015138128,0.021123089,0.0012686119,0.11566891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9311107,0.006828049,0.04925557,0.0014091908,0.0009319495,0.00071719603,0.005896504,0.0003066539,0.00354427],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9498198,0.021392202,0.0082755,0.0043323482,0.015321543,0.00085863733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6228,0.24399589,0.05736372,0.03729419,0.03502373,0.0035224725],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04120133,0.00038990148,0.0006345711,0.028611768,0.003766684,0.01133022,0.0017604538,0.0013990559,0.004585128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32365462,0.00036961166,0.0006638596,0.05182119,0.004984878,0.012594913,0.006332815,0.0020037966,0.0009286719],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002666716,0.000074574484,0.25192448,0.0043166573,0.00030065587,0.0005388476,0.068089046,0.00092836743,0.002081238,0.23095018,0.0326252,0.4079041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056618384,0.0002727167,0.31616497,0.0082395775,0.0005480958,0.0033632847,0.042365026,0.0061803106,0.0031697068,0.36293563,0.25633264,0.00037154657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068144957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004748169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006980501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2178961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213032464","doi":"10.1108/jd-08-2021-0168","title":"A qualitative study of social sciences faculty research workflows","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workflow; Qualitative research; Workaround; Knowledge management; Affordance; Coding (social sciences); Descriptive statistics; Scholarly communication; Process (computing); Computer science; Sociology; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.6414632590983634,"score_gpt":0.6612232504779997,"score_spread":0.019759991379636244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213032464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408501,0.0007345394,0.026038313,0.0069537433,0.00018086511,0.001634584,0.00071549165,0.00016373557,0.022728609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98105526,0.00065247016,0.00883182,0.00093373394,0.000044187575,0.0013213247,0.00015402285,0.000069323505,0.0069379327],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721286,0.020973943,0.0008347571,0.0011218443,0.0026676892,0.0022730643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94659644,0.039307933,0.0027908634,0.0020179527,0.005762824,0.003524091],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028934252,0.0004209623,0.00080149685,0.003509605,0.015066952,0.0059040543,0.0015989883,0.0013051336,0.0052965665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03633839,0.00048167314,0.0005578763,0.0051294807,0.012501067,0.0045726136,0.0045090243,0.0016720863,0.0006127067],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058666257,0.00008997685,0.0032279433,0.00017885129,0.000004525189,0.0005210896,0.9737693,0.00015186208,0.0010720151,0.007229068,0.0010872341,0.012609557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010811919,0.00007536971,0.0011743623,0.00020592997,0.000003946567,0.00016546196,0.970392,0.00021359322,0.0009497057,0.0019170645,0.024876393,0.000015391564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010783316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012324626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97106576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012593324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016846944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1530208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213386585","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2021-0084","title":"Embracing theories of precarity for the study of information practices","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Precarity; Sociology; Context (archaeology); Originality; Value (mathematics); Social science; Gender studies; Qualitative research; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.038514716027277594,"score_gpt":0.3938701684478791,"score_spread":0.3553554524206015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213386585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14051357,0.017774904,0.33938897,0.07915821,0.00055164285,0.0004716744,0.00016836268,0.00014203096,0.42183062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714787,0.0027278485,0.02073207,0.0012670504,0.00019492404,0.00040045066,0.000036011785,0.000033055225,0.0031298504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764755,0.017126491,0.0009850395,0.0013614952,0.0029708338,0.0010806519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9062232,0.07224522,0.006738008,0.009630654,0.0035234084,0.0016394374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024971616,0.0007427864,0.0008795006,0.0066720434,0.0054715965,0.013197183,0.0024445436,0.0028213742,0.004712969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04202893,0.0005162868,0.00094876817,0.0055099456,0.094337136,0.019939572,0.012908151,0.006012392,0.00056139927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056276845,0.000017005015,0.0010431081,0.00009594671,0.000005263418,0.000049006325,0.01821342,0.00021740921,0.000035098878,0.9745702,0.00017826771,0.0055696177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046085665,0.000019376641,0.0005653986,0.0004457248,0.0000060219554,0.00010837105,0.015156667,0.00049227144,0.00009924621,0.9694978,0.0135946255,0.000009777255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030681184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023140812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024971616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009147774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009199576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1320641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281992621","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2021-0233","title":"Questioning the role of information poverty in immigrant employment acquisition: empirical evidence from African immigrants in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Poverty; Information seeking; Originality; Refugee; Sociology; Information needs; Qualitative research; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.020113856843537347,"score_gpt":0.30072071697358554,"score_spread":0.2806068601300482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281992621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99018645,0.0007915615,0.000105646504,0.0027264995,0.000015429363,0.000044460325,0.000074070624,0.0000027644153,0.006053081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685645,0.0012133231,0.00015015205,0.00066616543,0.000005241941,0.000032569296,0.000038823677,0.000005619048,0.0010317683],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99511504,0.0015085322,0.00024917081,0.00029649856,0.0013247399,0.001506031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98216873,0.009769535,0.0018487888,0.0004230622,0.0038894434,0.001900494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009241243,0.00036377276,0.0006086633,0.0025971567,0.023856195,0.008102785,0.0019101778,0.0014457818,0.0035694693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023489887,0.00051094586,0.0003599723,0.004696263,0.014464123,0.0031296457,0.008884593,0.0030004806,0.00018711945],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026909725,0.000031287862,0.02777711,0.00015911198,0.000006717173,0.00064773037,0.96340156,0.000026595733,0.00019579397,0.0009559894,0.00058059854,0.0061904616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013784228,0.000007395774,0.009334298,0.00020596736,0.0000046581436,0.000050797193,0.9876036,0.00002570057,0.00004256372,0.00007435041,0.0026413184,0.000007954736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93756104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9559022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062438965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032841243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09641187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23828101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307169356","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2022-0090","title":"The colonization of Wikipedia: evidence from characteristic editing behaviors of warring camps","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Reading (process); Peer production; Computer science; Public relations; Data science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.018939913313964815,"score_gpt":0.3570195865142398,"score_spread":0.338079673200275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307169356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961175,0.00020600464,0.00027341538,0.00011405281,0.000011800942,0.000023799486,0.000070002105,0.00001140434,0.0031720398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989039,0.00012086043,0.0003846347,0.000035694942,0.000017162953,0.000022944063,0.00006622909,0.000010835393,0.00043786425],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399143,0.0029199803,0.000565703,0.0009493029,0.0012050337,0.0003684907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8876589,0.05587771,0.036055475,0.006062354,0.010014147,0.004331452],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005671196,0.00024759522,0.0002837973,0.003738493,0.0024131737,0.0029691758,0.00056872034,0.00060233544,0.0018617547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06124167,0.00025739952,0.000120502926,0.0021347986,0.0021047646,0.0029088655,0.0023886575,0.00060944725,0.00043380185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000278516,0.00017947172,0.7161573,0.0004641263,0.00008986787,0.000856754,0.22875653,0.00009569834,0.0038329642,0.0009120343,0.0014328144,0.04694391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012583026,0.0002114087,0.82891005,0.00024047602,0.00003971142,0.001043091,0.15727428,0.0005128105,0.0015770698,0.0010471545,0.009075245,0.000056087916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017970914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004107467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99758685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048717466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006277511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02999252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386328151","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2023-0070","title":"Does a name make a difference? The neo-documentalist movement, where does it stand after 27 years 1996–2023","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Web Data Mining and Analysis","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto; Fordham University","keywords":"Documentation; Originality; Value (mathematics); Object (grammar); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Movement (music); Perspective (graphical); Epistemology; Library science; Social science; Linguistics; Computer science; Qualitative research; Aesthetics; Art","score_opus":0.010093619589559627,"score_gpt":0.27342350706276936,"score_spread":0.26332988747320973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386328151","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10742672,0.12548509,0.0067385766,0.4512551,0.00921231,0.000056013945,0.00026724208,0.00008880956,0.2994701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8767225,0.02899732,0.004100511,0.019582547,0.0019397502,0.00013983046,0.00023291734,0.0003307463,0.06795377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97189057,0.013616738,0.002048641,0.0032134645,0.0073688226,0.0018618495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9666859,0.019288879,0.004242562,0.0025660074,0.0054859156,0.001730781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033235755,0.00038306604,0.0006512834,0.0028345964,0.01060474,0.01779873,0.0018239408,0.004214087,0.004662765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045854505,0.00037734082,0.0005331712,0.0057459,0.030421054,0.017382422,0.007357731,0.008137269,0.0010688691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011602544,0.000023794875,0.0024625985,0.00041824704,0.000012738181,0.00045007642,0.13716912,0.0001398812,0.00034368547,0.7622936,0.026182495,0.070387766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010897705,0.000033641616,0.0037970603,0.0017275965,0.000011636246,0.00034633628,0.050021015,0.00006829994,0.0004591999,0.025461607,0.91802865,0.00003403174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033286605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023715517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035127684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035127684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02309219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25487036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387704100","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2023-0113","title":"Exploring international collaboration and language dynamics in Digital Humanities: insights from co-authorship networks in canonical journals","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Digital humanities; Centrality; Originality; Library science; Sociology; Multilingualism; Publishing; Social science; Value (mathematics); Humanities; Regional science; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.554330087267495,"score_gpt":0.5669016626813276,"score_spread":0.01257157541383258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387704100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97133464,0.0025950503,0.00496036,0.00074500334,0.000044397537,0.00005048616,0.0012716961,0.00003893058,0.018959627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700326,0.0005339747,0.0013864179,0.000029425604,0.000030612788,0.000028824805,0.00031734287,0.000014523162,0.0006556092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711037,0.0011651057,0.00036562065,0.0004621162,0.0006325799,0.0002642012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9587877,0.022785818,0.01182917,0.001847698,0.003368008,0.0013816557],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035195097,0.00022210208,0.0003564699,0.017293822,0.0014385298,0.0062588598,0.000485894,0.00037358812,0.004222479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029607452,0.00013313483,0.00025640533,0.029800612,0.0019818603,0.006576506,0.0035428687,0.0004447853,0.0005392318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015874255,0.00005886029,0.8042381,0.0010075333,0.00015638584,0.00066727446,0.059445914,0.001222103,0.0019045671,0.027532611,0.0016886956,0.10191918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001569608,0.000094969444,0.745065,0.0007597088,0.00012582727,0.001561772,0.16822773,0.0044259173,0.0021216897,0.031847756,0.045672715,0.00008137558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042082565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007344818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99648046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016495365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016608333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01861316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388780016","doi":"10.1108/jd-11-2022-0254","title":"Advocating for a more active role for the user in LIS participatory research: a scoping literature review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Citizen journalism; Knowledge management; Participant observation; Computer science; Participatory design; Information science; Participatory action research; Data science; Sociology; Library science; Engineering ethics; World Wide Web; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.2505402611690001,"score_gpt":0.5341404453162293,"score_spread":0.2836001841472292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388780016","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004287099,0.9220049,0.019499598,0.03533054,0.003369957,0.0045320294,0.00020357134,0.00008088255,0.010691515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037001953,0.9102646,0.0321374,0.007658269,0.00077117106,0.010192461,0.0003004152,0.000070168666,0.0016035924],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8489707,0.0992172,0.02914212,0.004278052,0.015877724,0.0025142524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6106611,0.30164102,0.022625832,0.007902661,0.05395698,0.0032124931],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17143562,0.0017195998,0.0048672208,0.04446341,0.008640999,0.019944778,0.003598778,0.007989117,0.0033614663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28619215,0.0020695943,0.0037881648,0.039010756,0.01187443,0.020932661,0.012245721,0.0058986302,0.0012894603],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013300084,0.00014654222,0.0022967262,0.3518084,0.0006944537,0.0012149304,0.054425396,0.0008859314,0.0009986185,0.050304204,0.018048938,0.5190429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002453281,0.000113387396,0.0010231298,0.8155253,0.00065649574,0.0005409235,0.02680263,0.000367583,0.0004174706,0.010724452,0.14372855,0.00007553438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009238623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02108154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8285644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014786685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09197327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90664905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390273818","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2023-0082","title":"“They act like we are going to heaven”: pre-arrival information experiences, information crafting and settlement of immigrants in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Settlement (finance); Government (linguistics); Heaven; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Business; Law; Geography; Finance","score_opus":0.012485824160916857,"score_gpt":0.2932759951543559,"score_spread":0.280790170993439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390273818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9872541,0.00075264316,0.00013842373,0.0026581525,0.0000633399,0.00004477239,0.00013337712,0.0000124513535,0.008942889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925558,0.0009013303,0.00019900821,0.00079491956,0.00001104058,0.00002194114,0.00010801105,0.000018310002,0.005389686],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964814,0.0008479959,0.0001501607,0.00023444337,0.00085011567,0.0014359604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919143,0.0020082525,0.0007700052,0.00020600327,0.0021624577,0.0029389597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030655595,0.00053010037,0.0007164348,0.0016091113,0.03621507,0.008935019,0.0018673934,0.0016939185,0.0055613713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009568338,0.00049394363,0.00037861714,0.0031548939,0.01077385,0.002465717,0.007164542,0.0046416763,0.000504993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034381195,0.000026218893,0.009142876,0.00005112193,0.0000040159307,0.0010968978,0.9836088,0.000020898504,0.00022676836,0.0005156297,0.0011605525,0.004111858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015008997,0.000012941964,0.004273258,0.000051623603,0.0000022023894,0.00008267858,0.9902507,0.000015641539,0.0000372453,0.00003491652,0.005223686,0.000013577116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9610014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9774414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040146504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040146504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.085195675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29128462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391490528","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2023-0217","title":"Dancing with the devil: the use and perceptions of academic journal ranking lists in the management field","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Journal ranking; Originality; Field (mathematics); Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Perception; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Library science; Citation; Information retrieval; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.016926138961503672,"score_gpt":0.2671337750561174,"score_spread":0.2502076360946137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391490528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98543566,0.00075547415,0.0009313278,0.004135711,0.00008030841,0.000033553824,0.000037054266,0.000026061038,0.0085648615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645597,0.0004319458,0.0006084953,0.001106706,0.000048748796,0.000024425997,0.000024826299,0.000019199339,0.001279649],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97360283,0.017617442,0.0012788292,0.00085512345,0.005367011,0.0012788791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9035618,0.05576847,0.020124365,0.0031077608,0.008250366,0.00918722],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024050305,0.00023057968,0.00052105536,0.0029788043,0.0052135284,0.009286828,0.0010623646,0.0013789481,0.0034045617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074004404,0.00039248695,0.00024109783,0.0018330214,0.0063145473,0.0062855883,0.005146035,0.0018280734,0.0006241058],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009167119,0.00020791516,0.07328612,0.00046370583,0.000034165136,0.0012589569,0.8660396,0.00006007525,0.002039162,0.0040220073,0.003667486,0.048829142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010340563,0.00021590908,0.029209867,0.00028522869,0.000014885725,0.00069359527,0.9401433,0.00017653036,0.00029565385,0.0010981815,0.027795311,0.000061130784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003140257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035181069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019047292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029788015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12719172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393225472","doi":"10.1108/jd-10-2023-0200","title":"Contested imaginaries: workfinding information practices of STEM-trained immigrant women in Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Sociology; Gender studies; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.023948571984530473,"score_gpt":0.37060235692244553,"score_spread":0.34665378493791504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393225472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979756,0.0012792929,0.00039096831,0.0031497835,0.00007154401,0.000067162866,0.00022521417,0.000034147346,0.015025852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906714,0.0010422169,0.00045433466,0.0008839327,0.000008425798,0.000026755864,0.000114482755,0.000025208556,0.0067732544],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640733,0.00084615964,0.00012614568,0.00029695831,0.0008231821,0.0015002558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473023,0.0016275344,0.0004316071,0.00019728647,0.001344222,0.001669019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035855405,0.0006447257,0.0008096459,0.0024948593,0.028541975,0.009902116,0.0023277104,0.0015280196,0.00750388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006550464,0.00049037545,0.00043733546,0.0038076672,0.013950738,0.0022420445,0.0071386276,0.0020577966,0.0005484011],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004115226,0.000018987672,0.008784799,0.000093888244,0.0000046745768,0.00079963356,0.97936547,0.000029477167,0.00048969244,0.0007443044,0.0012402394,0.008387644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013360406,0.000011621505,0.0026692208,0.00007064429,0.0000033513438,0.00009821973,0.98903286,0.000021754982,0.0000500102,0.000061766965,0.007966048,0.000013174079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96633667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98350495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03923626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03923626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09121525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28468037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394821178","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2023-0090","title":"APRD: action partnership research design: reimagining the role of the user in library and information science research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Knowledge Management and Technology","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Participatory action research; General partnership; Originality; Premise; Participatory design; Action research; Research design; Sociology; Knowledge management; Citizen journalism; Design science research; Public relations; Computer science; Qualitative research; Information system; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering; Pedagogy; Social science","score_opus":0.3041508297606987,"score_gpt":0.5252900106402658,"score_spread":0.22113918087956713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394821178","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019048478,0.0031066113,0.8531215,0.043406855,0.002355383,0.010768802,0.00037823812,0.0007902098,0.06702402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16446698,0.0023378837,0.79204625,0.0076353536,0.0003317554,0.02568892,0.0002405573,0.00030992797,0.006942409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5449151,0.4236111,0.008890408,0.008812382,0.011441434,0.0023296135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7237316,0.21620305,0.008045331,0.031471815,0.013020832,0.007527328],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28215387,0.0011890216,0.0018177632,0.004617569,0.010309473,0.023117129,0.005694573,0.0057736733,0.009942439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16173051,0.0015763509,0.0019536882,0.00463788,0.036661204,0.021101905,0.039841384,0.009733383,0.0027572266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034722543,0.0002621315,0.0026149584,0.0066049797,0.00008165349,0.0004936597,0.2384769,0.001036133,0.0018940131,0.4771081,0.011074749,0.2600055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000461799,0.000838651,0.0012886575,0.008385322,0.00018839467,0.0012028608,0.14819568,0.0042506624,0.0038719794,0.35127363,0.47985768,0.00018464649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001330972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002023865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71784616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008180045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04095103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8852321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399207205","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2023-0103","title":"When words are key: negotiating meaning in information research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Key (lock); Negotiation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Sociology; World Wide Web; Linguistics; Data science; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05818480045530792,"score_gpt":0.44035677517288124,"score_spread":0.3821719747175733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399207205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4740642,0.018687852,0.1523749,0.08009366,0.002110312,0.0006624894,0.00019145248,0.00035110099,0.27146405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812277,0.0018615305,0.01190958,0.0015987911,0.0002054423,0.00023569331,0.0000483994,0.00017884749,0.0027339861],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.863281,0.11559464,0.004855821,0.004893441,0.00799259,0.0033824495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78526706,0.18385348,0.010004956,0.009075698,0.0066166385,0.005182201],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07181526,0.0012203981,0.0013988367,0.008888583,0.021531813,0.040424522,0.0032227996,0.0063019125,0.004299964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17377757,0.0015827874,0.0010949026,0.007259674,0.094887614,0.07493608,0.026370978,0.0063031847,0.00095853384],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007310844,0.000009219136,0.00079026225,0.00023449691,0.000014188053,0.00039143715,0.8524857,0.00006530625,0.0006470939,0.13645096,0.0005929359,0.00824524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029439545,0.000058915404,0.00043407377,0.00096122205,0.000036492725,0.0005868242,0.7319762,0.00029868196,0.00060816726,0.20729664,0.057657648,0.00005567221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020260727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016226813,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010165051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009603867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37979996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400921956","doi":"10.1108/jd-02-2024-0037","title":"Provenance and historical warrants: histories of cataloguing at the Museum of Anthropology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Museums and Cultural Heritage","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal British Columbia Museum; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Provenance; Anthropology; History; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.02793281307475942,"score_gpt":0.26218902919717063,"score_spread":0.2342562161224112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400921956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5754407,0.018684695,0.011000706,0.027150424,0.000457983,0.00023663662,0.00065980153,0.00019272228,0.36617637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97126085,0.0025558216,0.0016305416,0.00049790257,0.00005900034,0.000037412523,0.00012195032,0.000070854316,0.023765568],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99114543,0.004070904,0.0005744523,0.0008346618,0.0021858788,0.0011887116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751022,0.012400526,0.0025956724,0.0033268852,0.0050210855,0.0015537206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014065261,0.00025493762,0.00047415184,0.008370188,0.032074407,0.016690534,0.001669689,0.0017827894,0.006926177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03624707,0.0006625039,0.00016942399,0.014906896,0.04164351,0.011249981,0.009240505,0.0030360534,0.0003427684],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045608434,0.000011801987,0.008882348,0.00016784946,0.0000057498114,0.0007509556,0.7968224,0.00013146289,0.00021339083,0.13910605,0.004026998,0.049835365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004925774,0.00002026082,0.018521618,0.00097510166,0.000018680776,0.0004841693,0.5322654,0.00011759845,0.0004135354,0.019050807,0.42806143,0.000066504675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63603795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7842219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63603795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047252513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045113973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.732211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407856370","doi":"10.1108/jd-09-2024-0215","title":"Preprint servers and journals: rivals or allies?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Academic Publishing and Open Access","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Arts and Humanities Research Council; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Preprint; Server; Computer science; World Wide Web; Political science; Media studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.10659813698551751,"score_gpt":0.5003400696613653,"score_spread":0.39374193267584784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407856370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62019837,0.0142129315,0.009999771,0.12185412,0.0015973317,0.00018267726,0.00023325194,0.00032823885,0.23139326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808733,0.0019091837,0.0011339221,0.0038682586,0.00046336677,0.00004834064,0.00007594969,0.00007838615,0.011549202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.958372,0.022131536,0.001961431,0.0032557182,0.010606004,0.0036734135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8958152,0.044619177,0.01797253,0.0070030857,0.013924615,0.020665344],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023842828,0.0003298441,0.0009580097,0.0029663143,0.00917657,0.03313825,0.0015254995,0.0024387513,0.015276178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09255393,0.0005279835,0.00037047858,0.0066684447,0.009307115,0.019050267,0.010190275,0.002930593,0.0030532468],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067012466,0.00036644135,0.1767205,0.0010873422,0.0001740772,0.0026102792,0.18992728,0.00048097892,0.0018579138,0.33343256,0.04510691,0.24756569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000809462,0.00056478864,0.052612565,0.0010134563,0.00013611693,0.0026659097,0.4444565,0.0016057709,0.0010565094,0.11454572,0.3810602,0.00020144538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005748023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004065445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007294496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010677849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1260944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408209208","doi":"10.1108/jd-07-2024-0167","title":"Knowledge translation as an interdisciplinary method for information science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Interoperability; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Originality; Data science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.035433540345556125,"score_gpt":0.44049514801569456,"score_spread":0.40506160767013843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408209208","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034232312,0.0020521043,0.9438461,0.0070734457,0.0006255828,0.000257406,0.00009285131,0.0003935569,0.042235646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18123078,0.0022515296,0.8016506,0.0017362736,0.0005285048,0.0016257118,0.0001954903,0.00036985098,0.010411264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9751678,0.019189645,0.0012046898,0.0014389403,0.0027171338,0.00028185084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684927,0.021217793,0.00076075975,0.0072963354,0.0017954633,0.00043706363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017516473,0.00089622213,0.0011413639,0.007137178,0.003553527,0.011754129,0.0020607293,0.002457127,0.010124522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024982834,0.00054650486,0.0013895148,0.007255036,0.0236829,0.017620428,0.009171503,0.0044356515,0.0025400708],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000128983265,0.000023939518,0.00012132207,0.00023266958,0.000014786326,0.00007118349,0.0034320047,0.00042873799,0.00028220174,0.9527149,0.0012628746,0.04140239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014081439,0.000021319374,0.00008793936,0.0002798129,0.000010655973,0.0001473938,0.0023962443,0.0029376748,0.0005013906,0.94590145,0.047683932,0.000018134286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085393013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071094267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017516473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035091916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049239635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09263712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410265558","doi":"10.1108/jd-01-2025-0009","title":"Navigating accountability: the role of paradata in AI documentation and governance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bank of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Documentation; Corporate governance; Computer science; Business; Knowledge management; Accounting; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.015229457004781434,"score_gpt":0.4197074774598421,"score_spread":0.40447802045506065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410265558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2845448,0.010338261,0.17320237,0.12455392,0.0010807676,0.0010799563,0.00047796706,0.00071423507,0.4040077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9628272,0.0011826259,0.026823677,0.0011812621,0.00011917616,0.0003112137,0.00010217922,0.00013969239,0.0073130163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8475181,0.121754594,0.010499389,0.0052995714,0.012324929,0.0026035015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59258825,0.27640042,0.034063146,0.060991377,0.031774636,0.0041822256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13579309,0.00039762378,0.0007671473,0.011614854,0.01770416,0.03140624,0.003208732,0.0030083377,0.004546274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24643466,0.0007540078,0.00058800436,0.013343411,0.05979518,0.0348491,0.01570805,0.005200963,0.0005781582],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047502024,0.000043129992,0.006016559,0.00049141864,0.000017991846,0.000371372,0.25581798,0.00044220613,0.0003120336,0.656367,0.0036337078,0.07643916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002739207,0.000107451604,0.00611307,0.003919537,0.00004791242,0.00073795393,0.3347958,0.001669582,0.0016214554,0.33866146,0.31219298,0.000105370586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008742578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011649716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13579309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014863237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031490248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7181511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414713296","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2025-0129","title":"Information retrieval of humanities resources: subject searching from a user perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Usability; Exploratory search; Cultural heritage; Key (lock); Visibility; Subject access; Information system; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.014004928891972836,"score_gpt":0.2955831358688536,"score_spread":0.28157820697688074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414713296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16812566,0.024825435,0.2549127,0.052470785,0.00065154757,0.00038749256,0.0007320779,0.0030735922,0.49482074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85597986,0.011526895,0.09704801,0.005313052,0.0005272341,0.00026325526,0.0005040674,0.00073380757,0.028103732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99085593,0.0062860902,0.0005533107,0.00045983022,0.001589199,0.00025566292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857232,0.010050875,0.000576136,0.001770126,0.0013990828,0.00048059574],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008894587,0.00028231333,0.00067873235,0.0036248253,0.0023432192,0.018790951,0.00092012726,0.0015416346,0.007977844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021221824,0.0002959317,0.00049273676,0.0060839574,0.007042616,0.019516395,0.0049442705,0.0014412132,0.0024572485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015705057,0.000104411214,0.012966786,0.002907845,0.00006488558,0.0008502698,0.15831864,0.00071683526,0.0058667017,0.4845785,0.026590401,0.30687773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004052447,0.00019265283,0.008435287,0.0029604007,0.00013671663,0.0027307156,0.16020139,0.004548339,0.005519607,0.20675889,0.60834503,0.00013057441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034406323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031831826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98120904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020955876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028296798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047039688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415143794","doi":"10.1108/jd-06-2025-0160","title":"Exploring the contemplative landscape of Library and Information Science through the lens of Chinese philosophies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Spirituality; Holism; Chinese philosophy; Foundation (evidence); Conceptual framework; Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.04942873472302538,"score_gpt":0.32054132767126026,"score_spread":0.27111259294823487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415143794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.657846,0.010693204,0.06664439,0.031098811,0.00027146365,0.0004770967,0.00011981662,0.00010705871,0.23274216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912867,0.0012939496,0.00475764,0.0006023163,0.00003216794,0.00010476664,0.000019306903,0.000010331561,0.0018928852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721503,0.0018565671,0.00013408375,0.00018967572,0.00036234735,0.00024222859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967452,0.0020563966,0.00034272263,0.0003317022,0.00030039018,0.00022354418],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071473457,0.0006594527,0.00039131517,0.0037562596,0.0056216894,0.0058964663,0.0009544406,0.0010905494,0.0019393675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004093492,0.00026880248,0.0005163067,0.0038394858,0.03768734,0.006984359,0.004837063,0.0024859204,0.00013658823],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032071184,0.000034985314,0.0046740198,0.00040175236,0.000019639154,0.00036341557,0.34362426,0.000565912,0.0008220397,0.62743324,0.0006693708,0.021359252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003643441,0.000100058314,0.02013072,0.0011448492,0.000078720244,0.0005808267,0.31881163,0.006613048,0.0017015293,0.57103646,0.07967106,0.000094741445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016055958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012606447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99410355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105613265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012100568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07662821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415932926","doi":"10.1108/jd-04-2025-0106","title":"Annexing and dissolving countries with documents: comparing and analysing the accession of East Germany into Germany and potential annexation of Canada into the USA","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"German History and Society","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Annexation; Parallels; Documentation; Accession; Principal (computer security)","score_opus":0.007721972969377497,"score_gpt":0.24077995248442502,"score_spread":0.23305797951504753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415932926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96263474,0.0023217797,0.00071556476,0.0013182699,0.00003577953,0.0000810659,0.00026322826,0.000014390393,0.032615256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948036,0.0013877567,0.0007011579,0.00014331167,0.0000070520027,0.000039230265,0.00023381885,0.000019711963,0.002664415],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953056,0.0014002745,0.0003521708,0.0003410303,0.0014377191,0.0011632072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844519,0.008477117,0.0028011862,0.0007561829,0.0027365016,0.000777098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058135125,0.00031125644,0.00045442008,0.007386781,0.009550631,0.012914369,0.0013564664,0.0010339668,0.0024143942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02459226,0.00030804923,0.00022902623,0.018018542,0.014643379,0.0057208627,0.004854318,0.0018879332,0.00015619773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000084314095,0.000025164805,0.043943226,0.000284543,0.000021538479,0.0014156825,0.871729,0.00027954605,0.00035878917,0.050055373,0.0015389945,0.030263947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037921511,0.0000127774965,0.046361707,0.00050329097,0.00002089402,0.00014337365,0.9156124,0.00015465425,0.00038336718,0.0008799183,0.03589836,0.000025580512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7566675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8590334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2433325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049605217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03726173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48953104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116891643","doi":"10.1108/jd-05-2025-0148","title":"Interdependence in information practices: differences matter when caring for immigration data in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Government (linguistics); CLARITY; Settlement (finance); Thematic analysis; Sociotechnical system; Work (physics); Service (business); Economic Justice","score_opus":0.027202349365637465,"score_gpt":0.35589870828144743,"score_spread":0.32869635891580995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116891643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834451,0.00059693964,0.0004270049,0.0052671605,0.00004005657,0.00007547801,0.00012314582,0.000015408097,0.010009628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950599,0.0006001596,0.00048984535,0.0009779655,0.0000073883357,0.00003412841,0.0000932162,0.000026074891,0.0027113508],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98048925,0.0060808263,0.0009990179,0.0017702491,0.005730531,0.00493015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609805,0.018805064,0.003169406,0.001408285,0.008865876,0.0067709913],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014350709,0.0003587337,0.00070682674,0.0022091926,0.035635494,0.015725054,0.0026389044,0.0016274296,0.0039743437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041960362,0.00072367454,0.00044620456,0.005035292,0.01910595,0.004679028,0.010936487,0.004188743,0.0002728379],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036247002,0.000022700473,0.020825323,0.000047131212,0.0000064670685,0.00037917454,0.9698602,0.000018548873,0.00021157443,0.00095078704,0.0006231808,0.007018815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027551132,0.000014548123,0.020439817,0.00011693464,0.0000071622267,0.000089677764,0.9709852,0.000058337686,0.000078292214,0.00021696712,0.007967515,0.000022787115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97418547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9842749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10676853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19494122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77466357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}