{"meta":{"query_hash":"a3450316c6ff","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Education Policy"},"cohort_total":30,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":30,"exported":30,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a3450316c6ff","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Education+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1972554100","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2010.493230","title":"Wherefore art thou, inclusion? Analysing the development of inclusive education in New South Wales, Alberta and Finland","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Disability Education and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Inclusion (mineral); Thou; Inclusion–exclusion principle; Political science; Identification (biology); Policy development; Pedagogy; Sociology; Economic growth; Public administration; Geography; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.03611789058192525,"score_gpt":0.3771410126139979,"score_spread":0.34102312203207263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972554100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98977774,0.00052814547,0.0000870633,0.00080374547,0.0000055588957,0.000032380703,0.000039319075,0.000001333256,0.0087247575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960063,0.00056828896,0.00022145503,0.000117851574,0.0000022766974,0.000025449763,0.000043026273,0.000001954302,0.003013383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976125,0.0006460321,0.000086811546,0.00012206716,0.00047072844,0.0010619259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970036,0.00094362843,0.0003886586,0.00008460481,0.0007617434,0.00081771973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023289376,0.00019866021,0.00030128288,0.0022696198,0.006301387,0.004390644,0.0012146618,0.00075094565,0.0014340762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041829566,0.00027461955,0.00020389595,0.0033882034,0.0036209475,0.001259531,0.004868334,0.0010225889,0.00008428199],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002734301,0.00030596915,0.46518227,0.00047976215,0.00009576585,0.008184022,0.40445393,0.002468002,0.001795823,0.039394427,0.0018024304,0.07556414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012676782,0.000066407396,0.40721506,0.00027688584,0.00003601374,0.00029697994,0.5734567,0.0005595635,0.00037691413,0.0011194196,0.01655072,0.000032569198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9345774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9782656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065422595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047101412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053570297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3417462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994935465","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2011.566452","title":"Selling out: academic freedom and the corporate market","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Academic freedom; Higher education; Sociology; Media studies; Management; Political science; Economic history; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.14653237265222377,"score_gpt":0.4174404470687324,"score_spread":0.27090807441650866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994935465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051198397,0.34680983,0.00060257287,0.256456,0.0025109237,0.000014601592,0.00016969048,0.00006870646,0.38824788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30528066,0.25228614,0.00061808154,0.026143968,0.0063508824,0.000042528623,0.0001785008,0.00015227412,0.40894705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923444,0.00023872673,0.000015018225,0.00007807571,0.00020913681,0.00022463955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989993,0.000441105,0.00012680571,0.000060396666,0.000101722886,0.00027071778],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013613098,0.0006769926,0.00046482033,0.0009539951,0.004471845,0.018746706,0.001003871,0.0049427906,0.030932048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022055274,0.00034697016,0.00030702274,0.0025811312,0.017619133,0.01277126,0.0033059602,0.004333487,0.004844359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027806482,0.000030270709,0.0003601023,0.0001388567,0.000008130718,0.00011423457,0.0038605626,0.00018366147,0.00007970122,0.52353907,0.43579537,0.035862286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013173788,0.0000088360985,0.0014963077,0.0004649255,0.000004628423,0.000064593805,0.0042252457,0.0001541057,0.00006889615,0.15549342,0.8379846,0.00002117375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05808938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112954564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99552816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008880046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007841775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11550254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996692529","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2014.895853","title":"Exposing ideology within university policies: a critical discourse analysis of faculty hiring, promotion and remuneration practices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Higher Education Governance and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Remuneration; Ideology; Disadvantaged; Promotion (chess); Neoliberalism (international relations); Critical discourse analysis; Sociology; Public relations; Higher education; Political science; Turkish; Discourse analysis; Economic growth; Public administration; Social science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.04540650765656538,"score_gpt":0.45193123281843617,"score_spread":0.40652472516187077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996692529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85726404,0.0045899004,0.02533866,0.032011263,0.00046144705,0.00025048372,0.00016664676,0.00007200733,0.07984555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99574524,0.00051051035,0.0019123273,0.00043505838,0.00006709963,0.000074389616,0.000022757546,0.000025425214,0.0012072151],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867596,0.010302047,0.0002985447,0.00059390604,0.001126991,0.00091887935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581013,0.037282836,0.0017069895,0.00077289593,0.0015732065,0.0005627943],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023011148,0.00077663816,0.0007301422,0.0059406045,0.014587712,0.015333767,0.0015544136,0.0033200998,0.0014989711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021180226,0.00039174798,0.00038324393,0.004559006,0.037817765,0.0131355915,0.0053157643,0.004449275,0.00013457045],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024360414,0.000017341463,0.000650764,0.00007474559,0.0000039250376,0.00021792647,0.9068792,0.000095945325,0.00033304977,0.0870651,0.00050361414,0.0041340883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074958352,0.000017886941,0.0012363866,0.00040663654,0.000009910084,0.00010921911,0.95242274,0.0005372334,0.0009590745,0.01955431,0.02471759,0.000021543612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008318563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061209477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97698885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017871507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008719125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12966746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008424298","doi":"10.1080/02680930010009804","title":"'Fellow travellers' and 'true believers': A case study of religion and politics in Alberta schools","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Religious Education and Schools","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Parallels; School choice; Voucher; Politics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Public administration; Public policy; Sociology; Education policy; Higher education; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.018971373724137243,"score_gpt":0.3662630931801339,"score_spread":0.34729171945599663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008424298","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9886573,0.0002892134,0.000120664685,0.0023888908,0.000021224958,0.000048355738,0.00004267383,0.000005124663,0.00842651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910363,0.0004911389,0.00030070572,0.0005812992,0.000011824481,0.00002561567,0.00003873425,0.0000073172987,0.0075071156],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572694,0.0017703844,0.00005737347,0.00020924272,0.0005057311,0.0017303104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964043,0.0010630272,0.00036893156,0.00013243737,0.00039969993,0.0016316173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025245466,0.0004886411,0.00050056365,0.002144816,0.03926305,0.004565607,0.0028485307,0.0032281089,0.002797473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041664834,0.0005925597,0.0003011456,0.0039553754,0.009986356,0.0014920784,0.0047115283,0.003777778,0.00032015448],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007487169,0.00040049647,0.04995692,0.00005055831,0.00001264171,0.012351175,0.91523445,0.0002647626,0.00035849345,0.007557931,0.0035811502,0.010156467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071588634,0.000040492407,0.020018043,0.000047172503,0.0000070752985,0.00052556023,0.9693767,0.00014156416,0.00007893642,0.00026858546,0.009474634,0.0000140579805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93125176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068748236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054580018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033895582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3960076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010460258","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2010.518069","title":"Hidden markets: the new education privatization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Biopower; Michel foucault; Sociology; Governmentality; Neoliberalism (international relations); Economic history; Media studies; Public administration; Gender studies; Social science; Political science; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.008378957257784113,"score_gpt":0.3561869253403657,"score_spread":0.34780796808258163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010460258","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008453896,0.22261187,0.008513553,0.44450346,0.00286284,0.000035851717,0.00031304275,0.00013291671,0.31257257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63476735,0.12999739,0.0035984158,0.031228296,0.0038267805,0.00014078885,0.00018782885,0.00017523978,0.19607787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990214,0.0003321504,0.000024964433,0.0001489216,0.00025072673,0.00022181573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907243,0.00050397,0.00012067247,0.00010660699,0.00008170459,0.00011458833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017541193,0.00041395053,0.00040747892,0.00063678354,0.002164574,0.008009868,0.00075387064,0.004129185,0.017461618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004134606,0.0003710871,0.00040402115,0.0012532944,0.01259572,0.015876615,0.0035188845,0.0046063573,0.0016192626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009736057,0.000007655858,0.000062934756,0.000050041064,0.0000036521424,0.000033486933,0.00044421936,0.0002869885,0.000032501102,0.94031703,0.046153136,0.012598609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010067781,0.0000069352404,0.00034699612,0.000271732,0.0000028359968,0.000053099062,0.00065031875,0.0003703087,0.0000602259,0.72609395,0.27212542,0.000008056829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009568781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011318107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017461618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007262228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060602613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058414936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020136211","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2011.587539","title":"The evolution of accountability","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Accountability; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Sociology; Public administration; Articulation (sociology); Discipline; Control (management); Neoliberalism (international relations); Democracy; Constellation; Centralized government; Political science; Political economy; Social science; Law; Management; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.029013577717037442,"score_gpt":0.3817330172635755,"score_spread":0.35271943954653806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020136211","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11486141,0.003881925,0.01354516,0.28611693,0.00069042674,0.00007874524,0.0002510038,0.00027160023,0.58030283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789275,0.00058132125,0.0012306288,0.004876136,0.00008952217,0.000023835712,0.00003208957,0.000053485604,0.014185459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779303,0.0076014413,0.00035666162,0.0021515419,0.0072070095,0.0047531533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97635627,0.0064154835,0.0016250387,0.0017015169,0.009682557,0.0042191055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012375925,0.00032140958,0.00036497018,0.0022032838,0.01877863,0.016731756,0.0014021076,0.0031805295,0.0028723218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026175302,0.0003238419,0.00024527335,0.002743962,0.04526072,0.0053971005,0.0050025643,0.0067160004,0.00027699646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001994498,0.0000111635745,0.0036946496,0.00003181344,0.000010948915,0.00006353584,0.014711228,0.0006801329,0.0001647006,0.94815415,0.011401902,0.021055857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003183803,0.000044611104,0.017959127,0.0004090477,0.00003281464,0.00008380895,0.018673548,0.002590866,0.0009051877,0.3204937,0.6386543,0.00012107881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86504966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84047407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86504966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14212537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.153745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.995013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027466022","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2013.820354","title":"The emergence of a market-driven funding mechanism in K-12 education in British Columbia: creeping privatization and the eclipse of equity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Equity (law); Government (linguistics); Finance; Economics; Business; Decentralization; Public administration; Economic growth; Market economy; Political science","score_opus":0.015118958598788663,"score_gpt":0.3471384494599758,"score_spread":0.33201949086118715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027466022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80434567,0.002375652,0.0011614215,0.07861105,0.00013597085,0.00008650362,0.00023095983,0.000053754982,0.11299905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97274244,0.00057634857,0.0003176319,0.004360029,0.000018940233,0.000023425788,0.000042771706,0.000016079026,0.021902414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99414,0.0007590594,0.00012484145,0.0003780892,0.0012771974,0.003320818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920603,0.002523047,0.000656915,0.00030520555,0.0022886686,0.0021659115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029747202,0.0001712378,0.00029154457,0.0015135752,0.013921474,0.0112291435,0.0017255101,0.0031530154,0.0051155444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012751898,0.0005209675,0.00023445438,0.002636937,0.009569834,0.0029376098,0.0051762057,0.005452095,0.00021851316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025502456,0.00020207615,0.06374065,0.0003040362,0.000045614608,0.002920205,0.044748176,0.0035910162,0.0021265973,0.7334758,0.041932795,0.106658004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023050055,0.00017699014,0.3484181,0.0012983028,0.00009135864,0.00072481186,0.083867446,0.006701986,0.002500023,0.07301382,0.48256168,0.00041506303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9838648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8585631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14143687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16098978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034195738","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2010.498899","title":"Changes and possibilities: a case study of Nova Scotia classroom assessment policies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Nova (rocket); Ideal (ethics); Set (abstract data type); Subject (documents); Political science; Public relations; Pedagogy; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.1141926005112489,"score_gpt":0.4572020031561044,"score_spread":0.34300940264485547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034195738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97511214,0.00026684822,0.0003365564,0.0034769485,0.000032908225,0.00012893407,0.000058210546,0.0000054422812,0.020581968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928629,0.00032827072,0.0005171865,0.000625555,0.000008604183,0.00005723027,0.000027721637,0.0000045810484,0.0055679334],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956507,0.001823323,0.00011239478,0.00021708816,0.00048209532,0.0017143217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949333,0.0023825078,0.00049610017,0.00022955054,0.0006547842,0.0013037211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031262524,0.00035113818,0.00037145693,0.0011743394,0.022467239,0.004114835,0.0018935861,0.003261637,0.0023712544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00631353,0.00043186938,0.00037024697,0.0016638705,0.005199779,0.0012374145,0.0037613732,0.0037975302,0.00018507251],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002646165,0.0011400689,0.07585491,0.00019238653,0.000036137877,0.07141577,0.78885895,0.0023798367,0.0020293538,0.026224421,0.008363064,0.023240514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029384855,0.00014255186,0.03609504,0.00023525837,0.000019872361,0.0019637407,0.9205361,0.0011236508,0.0004980265,0.0010702423,0.03824927,0.00003681057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7430654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87714815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25693458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039387293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022047779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5168954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040267548","doi":"10.1080/02680930802192774","title":"Three decades of choice in Edmonton schools","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"School choice; Cultural capital; Social capital; Sociology; Process (computing); Capital (architecture); Economics; Public economics; Social science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.051583658547409095,"score_gpt":0.40713565663114515,"score_spread":0.35555199808373605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040267548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9354233,0.0018445044,0.00022956685,0.012770681,0.00007547316,0.000013716883,0.00009441985,0.000008078425,0.04954031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730713,0.0003739564,0.000105790794,0.0006546028,0.000015357578,0.000009232214,0.00003159048,0.0000075949947,0.025730656],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974026,0.0008426076,0.000057645346,0.0003282117,0.00053952646,0.0008293503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513656,0.0025416533,0.00047040166,0.00019553218,0.00047280334,0.0011830928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005406277,0.00011011488,0.0003696948,0.001427326,0.0066760713,0.004474801,0.00074855424,0.0013354415,0.010875586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005412067,0.0002932333,0.00022848969,0.0018065985,0.0065671294,0.0026918396,0.0039537507,0.002918231,0.00029706582],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002923158,0.00028497627,0.06740756,0.00009568677,0.00001784182,0.0006756049,0.48389432,0.00040488038,0.00037827084,0.36776263,0.012165302,0.06662073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004972268,0.00013867216,0.22154589,0.00047375765,0.000018034449,0.00015101866,0.3578888,0.0009065312,0.00050179777,0.025593739,0.3926582,0.00007382533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2707267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45927006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7292733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024464991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009609126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5383018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051622570","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2010.520744","title":"Educating for a high skills society? The landscape of federal employment, training and lifelong learning policy in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Youth Education and Societal Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lifelong learning; Government (linguistics); Contradiction; State (computer science); Public administration; Political science; Knowledge economy; Public relations; Public policy; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.032705769576903854,"score_gpt":0.3382865466155415,"score_spread":0.3055807770386376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051622570","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33547768,0.010587644,0.001126555,0.49181792,0.0003542103,0.000099125544,0.0004480423,0.00007589535,0.16001298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97654575,0.002420371,0.00073838094,0.01174288,0.00004029941,0.000024787387,0.000065970344,0.00001829057,0.008403253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915445,0.0010310479,0.00012947638,0.00038384815,0.0018825304,0.005028718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99042845,0.0020332583,0.0005039275,0.00015902374,0.0034860033,0.0033893872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059435004,0.00029133225,0.00050346274,0.0025498,0.032824837,0.014957416,0.0021719383,0.0041234046,0.003857186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012252795,0.0003599447,0.000377515,0.0037320466,0.015862867,0.0031006578,0.0030280293,0.0051918477,0.00015964973],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010700901,0.00010178166,0.022554917,0.0003017449,0.00005265262,0.00067064236,0.031367112,0.0025728596,0.00087931217,0.83790267,0.04981997,0.0536693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010439331,0.00010354762,0.12583996,0.0011972731,0.00018259951,0.00022872137,0.18102516,0.005601344,0.0017732084,0.11611919,0.56739646,0.00042818073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99850297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36084428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.36084428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.51165414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053332769","doi":"10.1080/02680930903428622","title":"Troubling the discourse of teacher centrality: a comparative perspective","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Sociology; Perspective (graphical); Teacher education; Certification; Pedagogy; Discourse analysis; Discourse community; Work (physics); Political science; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16747323743738543,"score_gpt":0.5251109834201853,"score_spread":0.35763774598279985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053332769","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22404206,0.063386664,0.007815077,0.16268688,0.002534269,0.00006699401,0.00006179917,0.00005349946,0.5393527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9791454,0.00880384,0.000545325,0.0026967998,0.0007221496,0.000057827445,0.000017400194,0.00006774919,0.007943441],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98147166,0.014427055,0.00020109967,0.00071115594,0.0015585083,0.0016304151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97922564,0.017563865,0.00090051594,0.00041269296,0.0012241118,0.0006732345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011157337,0.00080640666,0.0009771512,0.006525636,0.02784534,0.01845487,0.0021735241,0.007975795,0.0048983833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019455807,0.00055093266,0.0003567065,0.0064889737,0.067214206,0.019173304,0.009081831,0.011001387,0.0004589676],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002357513,0.000020548423,0.00026062774,0.00012907929,0.000004376539,0.0003883481,0.54423124,0.00005713243,0.00014990162,0.44933558,0.0020693655,0.0033301923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017028795,0.00003847084,0.00091212406,0.0008816571,0.000014122027,0.00046046005,0.7143376,0.00020111157,0.00035538865,0.055846687,0.2269188,0.000016498203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023761444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021003038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029264038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029264038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009395688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21232647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058986516","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2010.543156","title":"What’s so important about teachers’ working conditions? The fatal flaw in North American educational reform","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Institute for Christian Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Bureaucracy; Power (physics); Phenomenon; Work (physics); Sociology; Explanatory power; Pedagogy; Educational research; Order (exchange); Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics education; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.12337924773666574,"score_gpt":0.41990778364126397,"score_spread":0.2965285359045982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058986516","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15390761,0.009336277,0.0018571592,0.8070242,0.0012199762,0.000013811795,0.000050395076,0.000026233885,0.026564373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96670115,0.0029460988,0.0007406636,0.026525576,0.00088013883,0.00002991235,0.000021166756,0.000020064224,0.002135289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919785,0.0040515885,0.0003050585,0.0008181442,0.001843231,0.0010034748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984148,0.008286446,0.0018634001,0.001182324,0.0028880136,0.0016317697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013416604,0.00013101705,0.0003553717,0.000997647,0.0075064627,0.006289106,0.00085894647,0.0027176181,0.0018934474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0253763,0.00025334614,0.00026275186,0.0012890784,0.018367356,0.006458712,0.0026785478,0.0060885204,0.00021103874],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016622571,0.00029950275,0.09714982,0.00056189846,0.00006669051,0.00030847764,0.21231285,0.0006714868,0.0010434021,0.3263602,0.07988957,0.2811699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046225836,0.00014132066,0.36926544,0.0018488633,0.00007653961,0.00021431108,0.18054168,0.0006521002,0.0009915174,0.098601274,0.3474596,0.00016109002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.101457655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15199016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.101457655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010134046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010502735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20173419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059001269","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2012.672655","title":"Education policy racialisations: Afrocentric schools, Islamic schools, and the new enunciations of equity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Diverse Education Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); School choice; Sociology; Islam; Politics; Multiculturalism; Equity (law); Racism; Ambiguity; Education policy; Public policy; Political science; Public administration; Gender studies; Higher education; Law; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.031154275874547305,"score_gpt":0.404939697416479,"score_spread":0.37378542154193173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059001269","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29254365,0.00909025,0.0083594415,0.29452926,0.00072380714,0.0000506548,0.00003926997,0.000022904573,0.39464077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900005,0.0007452169,0.00054671784,0.004756109,0.00013680165,0.00001643649,0.00000406237,0.00000603972,0.003788118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.990737,0.0058405832,0.00020599792,0.0006593807,0.0011599314,0.0013971422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458367,0.002928809,0.0008364269,0.0003932568,0.00055469864,0.0007032051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010838844,0.00021673161,0.00032389007,0.0011760175,0.011868103,0.010492348,0.00066976936,0.0034918215,0.003294562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01005693,0.00023539085,0.00025655082,0.0011074408,0.043993153,0.008822828,0.007863694,0.0066987374,0.0001379295],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009189232,0.000010270173,0.00045841682,0.000013639418,0.0000013462958,0.000027040196,0.010935475,0.00005705987,0.000040805266,0.98411405,0.0005245898,0.0038081512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031083386,0.000060301896,0.008636917,0.0005953676,0.00001445338,0.00013323949,0.04787174,0.0005647112,0.0004230169,0.790322,0.15131143,0.000035815978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020263659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022946823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020263659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010275156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008561402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07455182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094998651","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2010.508176","title":"Decolonizing the evidence‐based education and policy movement: revealing the colonial vestiges in educational policy, research, and neoliberal reform","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; University of Toronto; American Educational Research Association; World Bank Group","keywords":"Colonialism; Education policy; Sociology; Neoliberalism (international relations); Power (physics); Political science; Political economy; Promotion (chess); Public administration; Gender studies; Politics; Higher education; Law","score_opus":0.13278903846806459,"score_gpt":0.4550440408884979,"score_spread":0.32225500242043337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094998651","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025229767,0.03145038,0.006962026,0.9015523,0.00083847577,0.000040429604,0.000023881898,0.000026992966,0.033875775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87414694,0.020554591,0.008764858,0.090536855,0.001639932,0.00019506256,0.000016263237,0.00008500208,0.0040604547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9022756,0.0757611,0.003301515,0.0044677802,0.010655734,0.0035382747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6843776,0.27848262,0.011759762,0.012860293,0.009034727,0.0034849483],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11441715,0.00071980525,0.0013744503,0.0056990804,0.015044013,0.038556743,0.0024533232,0.0139065115,0.0014754005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115156546,0.0010056482,0.00069636933,0.0067874077,0.20831205,0.03020599,0.017204374,0.023712587,0.00019008789],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011397149,0.000013149151,0.00031075013,0.00015017812,0.000007225012,0.000086384745,0.023866896,0.00016319039,0.000085388594,0.96662605,0.0027570412,0.0059223576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005747126,0.000037328708,0.0011722298,0.0021644651,0.000030718467,0.00021966745,0.035324037,0.0010628221,0.00047480853,0.829595,0.12980306,0.000058411886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02482148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036082614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98495597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037677765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048529997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60510296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096823647","doi":"10.1080/02680930110087807","title":"Cinderella and the search for the missing shoe: Latin American adult education policy and practice during the 1990s","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Variety (cybernetics); Political science; Public administration; Education policy; Public policy; Public education; Adult education; Identity (music); Field (mathematics); Economic growth; Order (exchange); Sociology; Higher education; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.021134230031017148,"score_gpt":0.4172572562884862,"score_spread":0.39612302625746904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096823647","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17682134,0.051429257,0.0003821349,0.62516356,0.00074493646,0.00003771133,0.0000756191,0.000027858936,0.14531763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8897454,0.020741193,0.00044849736,0.049830075,0.00045455684,0.000068375135,0.000057313235,0.000021334221,0.038633112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972294,0.0011391138,0.00012100053,0.00022297764,0.00026078278,0.0010267091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99681735,0.0012583807,0.00041872743,0.00008519661,0.000525725,0.00089453487],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063847895,0.0001888576,0.0003112686,0.001273181,0.0055762115,0.0054609734,0.000898187,0.0032749618,0.007388319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007468783,0.00017798699,0.0002080695,0.0020012208,0.0087357005,0.0034451738,0.0039115488,0.0033880167,0.00032278805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015354213,0.0002370983,0.019213367,0.0007920669,0.000016960536,0.0012425777,0.16958548,0.00044924236,0.0006934472,0.6163735,0.057374354,0.13386838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041581337,0.00005927465,0.02767747,0.0027740223,0.000011216595,0.00017987384,0.13477822,0.00016189272,0.0002896376,0.016260434,0.81773525,0.000031145475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13292223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13101237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13292223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019154849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020826826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26429707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125836161","doi":"10.1080/02680930701853070","title":"Urban accommodations: policy, education and a politics of place","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Space (punctuation); Identity (music); Education policy; Intersection (aeronautics); Place-based education; Inner Cities; Inner city; Public policy; Urban policy; Public administration; Epistemology; Political science; Urban planning; Higher education; Pedagogy; Environmental education; Regional science; Law; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.026558191659828142,"score_gpt":0.3633736628288637,"score_spread":0.33681547116903554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125836161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41794163,0.010301293,0.011494194,0.09612735,0.00050697644,0.00006338924,0.00007939882,0.000062639985,0.4634231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97798324,0.0014299528,0.00086422666,0.00073490373,0.00006297771,0.000024068479,0.00001122541,0.000011143133,0.018878382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764603,0.0014521893,0.000051164046,0.00014763934,0.00019071835,0.0005121932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829763,0.0005711123,0.0002742412,0.00012244396,0.00020294327,0.0005317253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001934191,0.00022316727,0.00031240756,0.001178471,0.007724902,0.0062869163,0.00092870597,0.0020366237,0.0057895216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030121114,0.00029511997,0.00020671851,0.0012694026,0.0258458,0.0044470876,0.008720138,0.0018902329,0.00045140658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002403837,0.000016358621,0.0022500262,0.00012312627,0.000006812118,0.0001733432,0.020465426,0.0012003332,0.00012003093,0.9594676,0.0020716286,0.014081271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021128208,0.00012025207,0.018397296,0.0010825681,0.000023260583,0.00027853655,0.12562191,0.0029610405,0.0007035919,0.47608164,0.37464032,0.000068487716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08456914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14932589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08456914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011261906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010646657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16815382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146937977","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2010.509813","title":"Policy fuzz and fuzzy logic: researching contemporary Indigenous education and parent–school engagement in north Australia","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Parental Involvement in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Indigenous education; Sociology; Disengagement theory; Foregrounding; Metis; Gender studies; Pedagogy; Political science; Public relations","score_opus":0.2521192044350063,"score_gpt":0.46438486927396794,"score_spread":0.21226566483896164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146937977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9235924,0.0015732402,0.0033904633,0.012885376,0.000034853925,0.0000806154,0.000010107594,0.0000056959366,0.058427133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707663,0.0006224808,0.00042185083,0.00016661,0.000006281538,0.000031110478,0.000002145219,0.0000023700206,0.0016705669],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500024,0.0031887877,0.00013304378,0.0003174843,0.00070016715,0.0006602918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99085945,0.006280489,0.0011410823,0.00031863942,0.0008611124,0.0005393729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007481856,0.00015971932,0.00038712795,0.0016028151,0.009823101,0.00536327,0.0010524467,0.001423052,0.0023317933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014964626,0.0003834749,0.00018581763,0.0017358821,0.016005753,0.0053707818,0.004268992,0.0029652186,0.00010494831],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018840572,0.00008067379,0.008671935,0.000120092795,0.000012461257,0.00043898885,0.85951704,0.00040611273,0.00027253694,0.11353181,0.0004959512,0.016433496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005464658,0.00009454575,0.030513857,0.00029397808,0.000013060565,0.00015990234,0.8891949,0.0026510437,0.00026386903,0.04887246,0.027912294,0.000024559544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14324667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15046081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14324667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0190257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011666243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28482574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162600991","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2010.523793","title":"Governments and education reform: some lessons from the last 50 years","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Educational Assessment and Improvement","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Political science; Education policy; Evidence-based policy; Public administration; Education reform; Focus (optics); Public relations; Economic growth; Higher education; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.060106948557418764,"score_gpt":0.44669924630213453,"score_spread":0.38659229774471576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162600991","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004739317,0.22855268,0.0007734491,0.74194676,0.002220662,0.000006932604,0.00006368177,0.000018826808,0.021677766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2787443,0.3821767,0.0019402729,0.31078672,0.010195762,0.00006063853,0.000113120026,0.000054450295,0.015928082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952846,0.002517444,0.00013506273,0.0002537963,0.0009060971,0.00090307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98858494,0.008434359,0.00052618125,0.00037294533,0.0013317986,0.0007497922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00685183,0.0005271507,0.00078705326,0.002066761,0.0030043856,0.010288524,0.0012577029,0.010961102,0.0057602553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011999614,0.0002968948,0.0008147532,0.0034833713,0.011670268,0.012995635,0.004137038,0.0070069437,0.00063163403],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015196555,0.00016267522,0.004209665,0.00096613186,0.00008752551,0.0004999067,0.0041480497,0.0025297115,0.00009238155,0.738484,0.13917041,0.10949748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006138371,0.000068520676,0.0063336557,0.0031540066,0.000033941615,0.00017725296,0.007566721,0.0006698496,0.0001307707,0.44896528,0.53277117,0.000067396766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035098936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05302391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035098936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01023298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070343446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07424587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170812890","doi":"10.1080/02680930110100094","title":"In/forming education policy","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Education Systems and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Syncrude","keywords":"Accountability; Ideology; Public policy; Education policy; Public relations; Policy analysis; Public administration; Equity (law); Political science; Stakeholder; Vocational education; Context (archaeology); Variety (cybernetics); Human capital; Politics; Sociology; Economics; Higher education; Economic growth; Law","score_opus":0.04589086390423861,"score_gpt":0.43383750040187574,"score_spread":0.3879466364976371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170812890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0057022693,0.004315672,0.0044060065,0.24520555,0.0037447321,0.00017058618,0.00024530862,0.00015958077,0.73605025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22710243,0.004766685,0.0063661374,0.085367195,0.0019403571,0.0002167094,0.00039911832,0.00013361321,0.67370766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926434,0.002645132,0.00034179157,0.000765656,0.0015768692,0.0020271358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948714,0.0016775129,0.0002798668,0.00044620063,0.0014411949,0.0012837839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009995694,0.00045701524,0.00044672296,0.0014119665,0.00587622,0.012856961,0.0014030201,0.0095444,0.050721254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014274873,0.00030784166,0.0004350415,0.0011213068,0.0044202455,0.0065864455,0.0050488813,0.0057745604,0.0071709044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001748016,0.000044662873,0.0006434438,0.00010062199,0.00000417803,0.00010633,0.0013788828,0.00028761665,0.00017415658,0.85862184,0.107885875,0.030735005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055621513,0.000009302334,0.00037154072,0.00018508449,0.0000031240797,0.000029257624,0.0010460626,0.0001627714,0.00021031145,0.033686444,0.96428585,0.000004771464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024480755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025170352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050721254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014650205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03614358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16967952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614364351","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2017.1303545","title":"Canadian offshore schools in China: a comparative policy analysis","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Center for Makroøkologi, Evolution og Klima","keywords":"Internationalization; China; Context (archaeology); Political science; International education; Politics; Higher education; Public administration; Economic growth; Business; International trade; Geography; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.040777792577793855,"score_gpt":0.4533715314604194,"score_spread":0.41259373888262557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614364351","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94924873,0.003466903,0.00015679265,0.0016840458,0.000022771994,0.00021523265,0.0039475695,0.000019324221,0.041238666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880832,0.004177087,0.00042178432,0.00027378777,0.000011174744,0.00014063755,0.0018598163,0.000005415546,0.00502705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975122,0.00029361236,0.000093678995,0.00017298103,0.00073293573,0.0011944971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971449,0.00043887255,0.00033222215,0.00010334014,0.0014346995,0.00054590974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016344119,0.00042143563,0.0005740473,0.009632774,0.0073403865,0.002528966,0.0011885801,0.0008572045,0.00552296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039100144,0.00029200912,0.0006322857,0.024207508,0.001231854,0.0009392452,0.0014257352,0.0007160754,0.00022760993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010027742,0.00080965937,0.66716444,0.0021405607,0.00045481618,0.0026083959,0.026950683,0.009237711,0.0010775371,0.1029571,0.04155837,0.14403805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074239564,0.00017337006,0.8834331,0.00041851815,0.00023299121,0.00018345246,0.043851797,0.003252731,0.00032463207,0.0010571367,0.06689246,0.00010558445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9893215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9922752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15293328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15293328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12605703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9824773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2724910112","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2017.1346203","title":"The geography of school choice in a city with growing inequality: the case of Vancouver","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"School Choice and Performance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Educational inequality; Social capital; Context (archaeology); Welfare; Social mobility; School choice; Spatial inequality; Social inequality; Polarization (electrochemistry); Geography; Distribution (mathematics); Economic geography; Demographic economics; Sociology; Capital (architecture); Economic growth; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.04417081785240207,"score_gpt":0.4087056994111085,"score_spread":0.36453488155870645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2724910112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897731,0.00015743899,0.00008424289,0.00063403154,0.0000043089126,0.00001766922,0.00012112988,0.00000257538,0.0092053525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982488,0.00018325738,0.00013411169,0.000053476237,0.000003033263,0.000008513433,0.0000818513,0.0000030698232,0.0012838398],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984389,0.0004069217,0.0000369348,0.0001350952,0.00027650082,0.0007056732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983448,0.0003059897,0.00017852528,0.00010596516,0.00039491846,0.00066987245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050765957,0.00020095818,0.00054628274,0.0019551849,0.011537538,0.0056698006,0.0013858059,0.0008285945,0.0025787044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025271778,0.00030848506,0.00033783558,0.0072015026,0.0043777036,0.0007997997,0.0039595217,0.0013291909,0.00019009241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033673618,0.00046656738,0.7838194,0.00020037753,0.00013851265,0.011534095,0.08460535,0.005992364,0.0013665983,0.068812236,0.0048276903,0.03790015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069988004,0.00009061181,0.6890151,0.00019504494,0.00008004903,0.0015881354,0.27346304,0.0060439627,0.00024498437,0.008192769,0.020915145,0.00010116387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96856713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9865781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031432867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025423486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012385249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18446112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802457550","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2018.1460494","title":"Domestic coalitions in the variation of education privatization: an analysis of Chile, Argentina, and Colombia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"McMaster University; Departamento Administrativo de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (COLCIENCIAS)","keywords":"Marketization; Politics; Variation (astronomy); Perspective (graphical); Interpretation (philosophy); Term (time); Economics; Political science; Political economy; Economic system; China","score_opus":0.015219891238501346,"score_gpt":0.3975291206502576,"score_spread":0.3823092294117562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802457550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820155,0.00076427,0.00026216113,0.0005424778,0.000007858538,0.000022437333,0.0003021732,0.000007785687,0.016075274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801254,0.0003101433,0.00009007412,0.000017809683,0.0000026754158,0.000013262576,0.0001903025,0.000005862713,0.0013573925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937856,0.00017143905,0.000029151544,0.00007065659,0.000091387265,0.0002587875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985399,0.0005239044,0.00045820384,0.00007684174,0.00023707638,0.00016410451],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009534286,0.00009003348,0.00024560635,0.0019867301,0.0017393917,0.0025299762,0.0004839231,0.00031034913,0.0038575067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035032108,0.00012764118,0.00016711839,0.004124668,0.0014822644,0.0015299268,0.0024159348,0.00055020815,0.000098005345],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038660035,0.00025231604,0.67529047,0.00037596948,0.00012937566,0.002966183,0.13954446,0.0039916183,0.00076730107,0.09646355,0.005899111,0.073933095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017345372,0.000046399808,0.79551744,0.0001803605,0.000036370864,0.00026675846,0.15957682,0.0020346905,0.00037505705,0.002848489,0.039066814,0.000033405264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16801113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21265225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16801113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008209639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029659166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3340664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991361814","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2019.1695919","title":"Policy, belief and practice in the secondary English classroom a case-study approach from Canada, England and Scotland","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Public administration","score_opus":0.017865678368991385,"score_gpt":0.2844631868292479,"score_spread":0.26659750846025654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991361814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94410586,0.00305424,0.00023931463,0.0129846,0.00011083884,0.0002524968,0.00024264972,0.000013339105,0.038996693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911731,0.0016944838,0.0003920806,0.00082190236,0.0000117094,0.00008476431,0.00007762929,0.000008744997,0.0057357247],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910584,0.002797024,0.00026069552,0.00031155822,0.0017756617,0.0037965756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98510474,0.00602884,0.0008595099,0.0001990429,0.0039575105,0.0038504233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053111594,0.00046266997,0.0007167612,0.0029725046,0.030762926,0.0087674195,0.0026141678,0.0027808603,0.0032174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011359813,0.00045865556,0.00041218332,0.006686359,0.011297886,0.0023386423,0.0047991257,0.0028327424,0.00024769106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012927766,0.00040602588,0.031211197,0.00036779413,0.000022067117,0.007034981,0.8980734,0.00039785946,0.00041388933,0.025791895,0.011858502,0.024293056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022003298,0.00005914767,0.020893805,0.00044194676,0.000019376848,0.00032516394,0.946311,0.0001698937,0.00014549818,0.00053076266,0.03104755,0.000033757584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98887575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99443215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15129915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15129915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18851677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9843727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162617185","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2021.1928849","title":"Public education, neoliberalism, and teachers: New York, Mexico City, Toronto","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Education and Multiculturalism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neoliberalism (international relations); Public education; Public administration; Sociology; Political science; Public policy; Economic growth; Political economy; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0780366789877655,"score_gpt":0.39447300107348815,"score_spread":0.31643632208572264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162617185","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05378974,0.3352367,0.00033900875,0.44538713,0.0021857887,0.000046389883,0.0030648364,0.0000882594,0.15986222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55006444,0.18938942,0.0006264807,0.0060365987,0.0014934343,0.00015391504,0.001121784,0.00008533867,0.25102857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993642,0.000121767596,0.000027506869,0.00007240629,0.00014777221,0.00026643786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986305,0.00028840356,0.00024920644,0.000044251618,0.00021221237,0.000575402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000685413,0.00039476165,0.0002945609,0.0016585017,0.007966018,0.0071394457,0.0008201306,0.0024179514,0.026064372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016607945,0.00053366536,0.00018047453,0.007077775,0.004546643,0.0046061384,0.0021436103,0.0031063464,0.00083730934],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012626218,0.00007349428,0.0281568,0.00079195836,0.000027692904,0.00069518713,0.047984157,0.0004839538,0.0002824232,0.21916899,0.6376094,0.06459975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018278775,0.000008878009,0.0824012,0.00056412455,0.000023427854,0.000098856915,0.025941016,0.0001183466,0.00013052138,0.0024040577,0.88826483,0.000026495514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9503372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07266178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07266178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052239314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5272006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237639012","doi":"10.1080/02680930802624974","title":"Book reviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.030868962931694794,"score_gpt":0.41881356798181957,"score_spread":0.3879446050501248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237639012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029415154,0.033710267,0.0006075912,0.012013778,0.016390605,0.000084196545,0.00067971065,0.00043249063,0.9357872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00048731643,0.0061666467,0.000167432,0.0019497753,0.0015766588,0.000019422885,0.00021985508,0.00007343435,0.98933953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999292,0.00006502962,0.000018709965,0.00007312509,0.000489781,0.00006138695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863964,0.00027183272,0.00007036914,0.00014645058,0.00063019723,0.00024151741],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054538605,0.00093987625,0.00088662445,0.003341987,0.0015126012,0.0041000186,0.0011599167,0.0021759754,0.47619757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027071675,0.00044280334,0.000526469,0.003577473,0.0006570103,0.002550045,0.0013444101,0.0022213408,0.4505795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004947323,0.00001434629,0.00002490881,0.000064947075,9.857357e-7,0.000012334283,0.000012554462,0.000026306212,0.000053918244,0.0019313903,0.950332,0.04752133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018099831,0.0000034635525,0.00006833649,0.0000615992,9.744692e-7,0.000016718317,0.000013969437,0.000011344612,0.000019901623,0.0005784489,0.9992219,0.0000015393229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053962967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016185125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47619757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001727475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002493936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7471406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379389112","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2023.2221203","title":"Deliberation and decisionism in educational policymaking: How Nepali educational policymakers negotiate with foreign aid agencies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Nepali; Public administration; Politics; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Power structure; Negotiation; Public relations; Economics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.02991362408657519,"score_gpt":0.37202369077879394,"score_spread":0.3421100666922188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379389112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79043466,0.0019442497,0.019176599,0.04575597,0.0001953529,0.00046079286,0.000058774905,0.000051906227,0.14192179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956453,0.0002569281,0.0009423922,0.0007180975,0.000008185388,0.00008736403,0.000006585693,0.000010720467,0.0023245113],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9328934,0.058723465,0.0009693105,0.0014310462,0.0018938314,0.0040890216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959312,0.034911916,0.0021703483,0.0008199042,0.0011686799,0.0016172032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038074177,0.00044236518,0.0006338832,0.0023443522,0.018925237,0.016825592,0.0018831554,0.0034349016,0.0027173103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039932005,0.0006150376,0.00060509105,0.0023477827,0.040765826,0.012184981,0.011688464,0.0059353975,0.00036159437],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032532032,0.000044684388,0.0026719396,0.00011886022,0.000013009506,0.00096149096,0.899345,0.0004039467,0.0002286897,0.08888485,0.0006895749,0.0066054496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021726197,0.00002995,0.0016274101,0.0004425981,0.0000123371265,0.00027465442,0.91397125,0.00079949235,0.00039160223,0.031046942,0.051339187,0.000042839085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011364194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009214061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038074177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01250878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016423147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2013579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394683337","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2024.2339905","title":"Falling short of university admission in Brazil: responses from <i>cursinhos populares</i> social movements","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Social and Political Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Falling (accident); Social movement; Movement (music); Political science; Sociology; Politics; Psychology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.04341085128542917,"score_gpt":0.4277432486044944,"score_spread":0.38433239731906527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394683337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9708171,0.00077278353,0.00016779378,0.01634714,0.0000921991,0.000041636376,0.000034890996,0.000008212947,0.011718253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946437,0.00060280756,0.00006422262,0.0020542913,0.00003525024,0.000017859049,0.000013028581,0.000009813268,0.002558947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99576217,0.0019740819,0.00014994618,0.00024734254,0.00052953634,0.0013369223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99241805,0.0037399582,0.0011481007,0.00022606192,0.0006820658,0.0017857586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049691647,0.00031767227,0.000605462,0.0009816319,0.010833497,0.004375738,0.0009801376,0.0036317396,0.003273734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014031649,0.00039562478,0.00034595732,0.0013094896,0.0072466675,0.0024224988,0.005422521,0.0041137408,0.00020603728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024831048,0.00004286416,0.011617187,0.000112152826,0.000005382365,0.00096062745,0.9731982,0.000023608487,0.0008165881,0.005873407,0.0014401971,0.0058850246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003814018,0.00003764261,0.009994601,0.00017260452,0.000004932492,0.0001567264,0.95934504,0.000056919307,0.00021932999,0.00051628106,0.029472332,0.000019733034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06378801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08755016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06378801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006657415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060651805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12683344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414928689","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2025.2571001","title":"Problems and possibilities of neoliberal education reforms: accountability, high-stakes testing, and inequality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Neoliberalism (international relations); Educational inequality; Social inequality; Economic inequality; Public education","score_opus":0.02942274400561202,"score_gpt":0.3802342768473151,"score_spread":0.3508115328417031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414928689","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014975787,0.0030775303,0.0011243318,0.98842806,0.0006112833,0.0000069847706,0.000017133127,0.000013578945,0.0052234726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3680128,0.014631027,0.009350156,0.5915309,0.0060501797,0.00019268319,0.000068602414,0.00008811581,0.010075535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94663,0.033728357,0.002111397,0.0023155704,0.01059691,0.0046178587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8557594,0.11419453,0.006409683,0.0052080695,0.01214493,0.006283383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069522046,0.0005607169,0.0012523457,0.002280003,0.008810263,0.015684254,0.0024676248,0.021130316,0.004503112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10806833,0.0005560738,0.0009778752,0.0021114543,0.043494876,0.023244308,0.010818729,0.029480759,0.00070737064],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003478496,0.00006860499,0.0011032489,0.000096671625,0.000018850493,0.00020554106,0.0020823153,0.00046729314,0.00011676259,0.8676754,0.09437786,0.03375268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059919545,0.00002428486,0.0016592952,0.00055317354,0.000012604612,0.00016279481,0.002196452,0.0012644789,0.00035244692,0.8750163,0.11860517,0.00009296474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021016058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017762687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.069522046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0131729795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024446504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3676721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416382163","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2025.2580973","title":"Hybrid network governance: methodologies of studying online and offline networking in global climate education policy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Global Educational Policies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Social network analysis; Network governance; Online and offline; Corporate governance; Hybridity; Network analysis; Social network (sociolinguistics); Organizational network analysis; Field (mathematics); Policy analysis","score_opus":0.03595510680262003,"score_gpt":0.44904969588834787,"score_spread":0.4130945890857278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416382163","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14053555,0.0027579246,0.72676826,0.008357646,0.00021030995,0.0015198888,0.0010609258,0.00016221068,0.118627265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7796475,0.0019200434,0.20688753,0.00047364485,0.0001360296,0.0036573415,0.00043316575,0.000105634674,0.0067390706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98743534,0.010776156,0.00021548774,0.0008552025,0.00043872345,0.0002790353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9705254,0.023103103,0.0021839703,0.0027029403,0.0008979526,0.0005866705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013924204,0.0006067308,0.00040113728,0.006758894,0.0030457594,0.0065685636,0.0014950368,0.0015169638,0.005513696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021554086,0.000536168,0.00068666926,0.0067466223,0.009391383,0.011876416,0.00442895,0.0018132222,0.0004364517],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049330658,0.0001573951,0.022242092,0.00037909637,0.00007432741,0.00030013063,0.07066864,0.005010354,0.0005488314,0.8364057,0.0026319334,0.061532155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046338366,0.00008033336,0.01651364,0.0009850505,0.00006530925,0.00033951682,0.110041134,0.043064278,0.0010463062,0.74069417,0.087052606,0.00007134586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006438093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010203438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013924204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050109406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003666268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073639095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7114784206","doi":"10.1080/02680939.2025.2600315","title":"Teacher competence discourses: exposing, controlling, and punishing the ‘bad’ teacher","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education Policy","topic":"Teacher Education and Leadership Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Punishment (psychology); Teacher education; Teacher quality; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.05145135688977235,"score_gpt":0.4297034104313508,"score_spread":0.3782520535415784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7114784206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7094743,0.0028277887,0.01533521,0.07454019,0.00040655455,0.00011544283,0.000046883182,0.000112089045,0.19714148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99500257,0.00038897988,0.0007489543,0.0009688003,0.000040629482,0.000031191834,0.000008718977,0.00003569,0.002774364],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97795504,0.016711414,0.0004960296,0.0010387283,0.002430425,0.001368352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96921813,0.02377398,0.002721101,0.0010345456,0.0022410892,0.0010111587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016817154,0.0005782193,0.00054550666,0.002376243,0.017150551,0.011104563,0.0015795527,0.004307019,0.0018071266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03542609,0.00046104958,0.00028785324,0.0012297812,0.05534871,0.008513477,0.0067925854,0.008169838,0.00030727926],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013704766,0.000021881448,0.001073147,0.00006824881,0.000002881601,0.00017647847,0.90014076,0.000090261114,0.0005353675,0.093858995,0.0010103333,0.0030079165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014537794,0.000036164576,0.0019213549,0.0004844266,0.000016548052,0.00020662796,0.8999995,0.00056297187,0.002136952,0.022338629,0.07225349,0.000028788481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021020448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014748771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021020448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0127215935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008286197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092302084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}