{"meta":{"query_hash":"60bd9b7f56ae","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science"},"cohort_total":45,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":45,"exported":45,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/60bd9b7f56ae","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Education+for+Library+and+Information+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W150674597","doi":"","title":"Students' Perceptions of Information Programs in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Evaluation of Teaching Practices","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Curriculum; Higher education; Medical education; Perception; Customer satisfaction; Quality (philosophy); Scale (ratio); Pedagogy; Marketing; Political science; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.04410791444519938,"score_gpt":0.3821469833234404,"score_spread":0.338039068878241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W150674597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821857,0.000016218099,0.00031639342,0.007729891,0.0005452116,0.0003898637,0.0000020313296,0.0000045512147,0.008810107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99462324,0.000108711225,0.0045151343,0.0006242775,0.00003632639,0.000015977788,0.000006293475,9.755948e-7,0.00006905468],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985977,0.000055683333,0.000572754,0.000029706202,0.0006399582,0.00010422358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848986,0.00012664704,0.00079377927,0.000055773675,0.00043111594,0.00010280731],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013781124,0.00003910554,0.00007731834,0.0004239666,0.0002297059,0.00036988012,0.0003283202,0.00002040791,0.0001302405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007555781,0.000034395587,0.00001853464,0.00058256346,0.00014077399,0.096089005,0.00002479,0.00008040187,0.000003913789],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025823245,0.00012954761,0.5438959,0.00006905824,0.000007031199,1.3654889e-8,0.061936583,0.0001671303,0.000044875724,0.12727489,0.0051525882,0.2612966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030154345,0.0000894351,0.7260786,0.00007208344,0.0000067767583,0.000003061772,0.1384404,0.00032199483,0.000058450027,0.0017424412,0.13280213,0.0000830772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040256977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002924345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2612135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011063639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067665325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1568498569","doi":"10.2307/40323939","title":"Research Methods as a Core Competency","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Work (physics); Educational program; Core competency; Library science; Information science; Medical education; Higher education; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Management; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.08431773318582808,"score_gpt":0.4861776476945739,"score_spread":0.4018599145087458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1568498569","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08803669,0.0002854553,0.0034471806,0.012944736,0.0028195856,0.00051001314,0.0000043136592,0.000028319766,0.8919237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6745613,0.0017691007,0.29583433,0.019902412,0.0005653931,0.000034965105,0.000013881187,0.000009106572,0.0073095025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982179,0.00017830379,0.00057652785,0.00007235926,0.0006895131,0.0002654212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798554,0.00043122843,0.00042535248,0.00011393714,0.0007301769,0.00031375783],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006407993,0.00005930588,0.000103160106,0.0010365093,0.0013380062,0.0009625566,0.00050524547,0.000044799515,0.00038132488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021398289,0.000047876507,0.000045999426,0.002265217,0.0008201499,0.21735589,0.000032410073,0.00015817532,0.000024237193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009715622,0.000019673056,0.00041642872,0.00000965284,0.0000011682395,2.2318599e-8,0.01200167,0.0000028543843,0.00004391655,0.96069837,0.004325289,0.022471271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012814364,0.0001222345,0.0012009436,0.000025220012,0.0000017355865,0.000015952965,0.036205944,0.00006351709,0.0009618859,0.05902384,0.90218884,0.000061731465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003140349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.1231135e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9016745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002781929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006885999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569654003","doi":"","title":"Hello and Welcome","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Yesterday; Columbia university; Desk; History; Media studies; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.015600918218585528,"score_gpt":0.3006565994616679,"score_spread":0.2850556812430824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569654003","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.764804,0.0001291062,0.0031010187,0.0393706,0.0025138895,0.0002867524,0.000003533684,0.000026956894,0.18976414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99209493,0.00024714955,0.0040758494,0.002681704,0.00028145834,0.0000017601562,0.0000019627544,0.0000011113607,0.0006140851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993471,0.000024298835,0.0002433451,0.000048038117,0.00023622057,0.000100983336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934894,0.00009091719,0.000254472,0.000043814296,0.000093028575,0.00016882076],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094658154,0.000035861292,0.000058190108,0.00024649434,0.0005296323,0.00059839623,0.00017910471,0.000022965876,0.00003238888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028955776,0.00002898405,0.000016698947,0.00041390175,0.0003767842,0.070271,0.000017158176,0.000040118677,0.000002134545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101975165,0.000014392624,0.0044512795,0.000011497354,7.742694e-7,9.186269e-9,0.005267144,0.000001974613,0.00010377363,0.93701553,0.0025404403,0.050582986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012477399,0.00014081421,0.017515942,0.000019053874,0.000002701357,0.0000071588806,0.006257573,0.00020894976,0.0006858642,0.015482119,0.95949554,0.00005948215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012901914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.3490467e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95695513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000052753885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090679293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94273263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1585234429","doi":"","title":"Welcome to Library and Information Science","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"BATES; Discipline; Information science; Sociology; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Library science; Sensibility; Vision; Computer science; Social science; Linguistics; Political science; History","score_opus":0.020526579109420212,"score_gpt":0.311630750344086,"score_spread":0.2911041712346658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1585234429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7893484,0.0001479856,0.0009777058,0.036226638,0.0047649266,0.0006385903,0.000015800379,0.000057071302,0.16782288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98243827,0.0004319441,0.009400095,0.0067458972,0.00057269627,0.000008411021,0.000007970889,0.0000026620337,0.0003920508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841654,0.000027354834,0.00051132066,0.00007987754,0.00063269405,0.00033222203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852777,0.00009578827,0.0004367027,0.00010223974,0.00014911515,0.00068839185],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014939606,0.000083314706,0.0001034911,0.0011649358,0.0012051258,0.0018279733,0.0005030728,0.00004196094,0.00007839837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044876503,0.00006986288,0.000027888726,0.0023674842,0.0008298104,0.543543,0.00009640933,0.00008539962,0.000013759698],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029559764,0.000031897303,0.014974471,0.000020307107,0.0000012321299,1.531833e-8,0.017487403,0.000004291478,0.00020620905,0.9333706,0.0028469712,0.03102707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001375773,0.00014357308,0.079455845,0.000034465924,0.0000041220815,0.000014347333,0.013710527,0.000059153517,0.002712798,0.0016595582,0.9019439,0.00012410789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001297117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.4138374e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.931711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018300603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030207334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992082},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W188243981","doi":"","title":"Research in Action: Taking Classroom Learning to the Field","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Variety (cybernetics); Action research; Action (physics); Field (mathematics); Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Field research; Educational research; Library science; Public relations; Medical education; Psychology; Political science; Pedagogy; Social science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.30559785842964987,"score_gpt":0.5157125212540734,"score_spread":0.21011466282442354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188243981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81727743,0.00006606881,0.04263795,0.10229946,0.004035841,0.00093316415,0.0000021196784,0.00002267258,0.032725316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8563252,0.00014694499,0.13804345,0.003579392,0.000293226,0.000066011235,0.0000015850842,0.0000044137737,0.0015397435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919164,0.00008463777,0.00033306144,0.00004395461,0.00022916685,0.000117507785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968884,0.002366537,0.00028119245,0.00007674314,0.00031645526,0.000070656606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021224648,0.00003590347,0.00006434149,0.0005844707,0.00025889088,0.00034760713,0.00021667601,0.000022886847,0.00011545332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005805269,0.000023749812,0.000015103334,0.000786182,0.00006204382,0.009092684,0.00003889842,0.00019910095,0.000010891643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035670426,0.00005039121,0.00201021,0.000080484264,0.000003142544,3.107531e-8,0.010677759,0.000059773363,0.00029479913,0.60056275,0.13260834,0.25361666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023154018,0.00032600077,0.04029385,0.0001530201,0.000004547312,0.0000317284,0.07145161,0.00083183835,0.0048690457,0.20946884,0.6722254,0.00011257514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000021996216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.7252476e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53961706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000193322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005346986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6949868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116889900","doi":"10.3138/jelis.56.3.213","title":"Studying Online: Student Motivations and Experiences in ALA-Accredited LIS Programs","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Higher education; Medical education; Library science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05198542600907097,"score_gpt":0.37331894074125593,"score_spread":0.32133351473218497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116889900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927917,0.000094184936,0.000100522986,0.003654062,0.0005057905,0.00018820171,0.0000010060819,0.000009534918,0.002654977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99130183,0.0001379902,0.0079968795,0.00024355002,0.00020446094,0.000011657341,0.000006456743,0.0000015288633,0.00009566509],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990853,0.00003777306,0.0003504573,0.000057190682,0.00034968302,0.0001196148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920344,0.00006530933,0.00029801714,0.00003840606,0.00023151177,0.00016331804],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009721496,0.000045127308,0.00008054745,0.00041339907,0.0002927442,0.00045618822,0.00018010505,0.000025350586,0.000007846441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051532,0.000036903068,0.000014225478,0.0008625864,0.00022846575,0.029012365,0.0000342612,0.0000832335,3.257347e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003661935,0.0003711736,0.26967615,0.000020598138,0.000004787938,1.8818702e-7,0.42687303,0.000046964153,0.000020753945,0.031243803,0.00090748235,0.27079847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033678982,0.00022710023,0.048697438,0.000059787166,0.0000041460753,0.0000048357106,0.7925163,0.000344066,0.00004265417,0.0004666455,0.1572248,0.00007541712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000056776557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018421928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3656433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023324512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018289948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98456836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123277306","doi":"","title":"Drawing Information in the Classroom.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Art Education and Development","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Bespoke; Conversation; Class (philosophy); Variety (cybernetics); Citizen journalism; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01624728924938231,"score_gpt":0.24605497473858418,"score_spread":0.22980768548920186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123277306","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32076886,0.00006201264,0.0041778707,0.034405448,0.0043351976,0.00052028237,0.000005571009,0.000023025406,0.6357017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881749,0.000028141205,0.001395571,0.009828524,0.00022808085,0.000010005813,0.000010795835,0.0000011802802,0.00032275598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999265,0.000017436372,0.0004158824,0.000025496884,0.00019554538,0.00008060842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934524,0.000087561166,0.00031278704,0.00005873753,0.00015289318,0.000042776766],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080595294,0.00004327656,0.000055488672,0.00043138783,0.00033295166,0.000727218,0.00019465359,0.000011634109,0.00009238645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016362753,0.000027643566,0.000020206488,0.00014564973,0.00012714144,0.047267728,0.000013630305,0.000062778556,0.00001219741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008724264,0.00001826439,0.0003377109,0.000015724418,8.041908e-7,2.5359561e-9,0.065155365,0.000009162407,0.000001448558,0.88930726,0.010815604,0.034329936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013844388,0.00004739687,0.005357419,0.000019856867,0.0000017714992,0.0000063370535,0.030001288,0.00031043834,0.000042756914,0.006668586,0.9573637,0.000041984917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.127308e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.6677271e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9465481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010931051,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004664827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96605766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128681738","doi":"","title":"Studying Collaborative Learning Using Name Networks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Context (archaeology); Social network (sociolinguistics); Data science; Social network analysis; Information retrieval; Social media","score_opus":0.0178173315642087,"score_gpt":0.3377442311990111,"score_spread":0.31992689963480236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128681738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83603305,0.0009372615,0.030093897,0.01982506,0.0056262515,0.0009368323,0.0000032956214,0.000066799854,0.10647758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98948115,0.00041831925,0.008005937,0.0014080246,0.0004250766,0.0000027424126,0.0000033637298,0.0000018538657,0.00025352108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990535,0.0000667857,0.0003749213,0.000058043093,0.00031006534,0.00013673124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984253,0.000084344916,0.00058191305,0.000047302718,0.00072467513,0.00013643956],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010891387,0.000054430762,0.00008717487,0.0003708509,0.0011290095,0.0006768759,0.00018339677,0.000038825587,0.000036079942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000571901,0.000050476665,0.000022749444,0.0014764006,0.0001772998,0.0375637,0.000009993418,0.0001022079,9.4624545e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008284416,0.0001247191,0.0046067634,0.000009920505,0.000007046054,5.4302827e-8,0.06798691,0.0053016464,0.00018516496,0.7653391,0.0028585212,0.15349731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044007457,0.00037201846,0.015947886,0.00009029237,0.000019885207,0.000008873998,0.16885261,0.008486671,0.00035208047,0.0049627805,0.8002579,0.00020889912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000011308832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.389725e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7973994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005522634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032347396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97589743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132990262","doi":"","title":"Profiles in Retention Part 1: Design Characteristics of a Graduate Synchronous Online Program.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Attrition; Distance education; Retention rate; Computer science; Online learning; Medical education; Degree program; Educational program; Instructional design; Mathematics education; Psychology; Library science; Multimedia; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.043288133795217225,"score_gpt":0.3282931991453226,"score_spread":0.2850050653501054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132990262","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99276644,0.000037843867,0.00076704257,0.004000724,0.0004553179,0.00054046727,0.000004668897,0.000010933157,0.0014165809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95100623,0.00041831928,0.04810017,0.00013500606,0.00017918288,0.000019149085,0.00001744794,0.0000020903437,0.0001223825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990868,0.00004757449,0.0004755744,0.000042011758,0.00023402352,0.00011400117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889183,0.00006791874,0.0006144671,0.000040757644,0.0003097456,0.00007528769],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074325514,0.000040404957,0.0000934252,0.00033283888,0.00014951562,0.00018574006,0.00014367202,0.000028040784,0.000038664355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040187538,0.000033101893,0.000024768255,0.0005250031,0.00018532475,0.0221828,0.000012799914,0.00008043385,0.0000015718887],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000357629,0.0002841604,0.009164057,0.000083127605,0.0000037755644,5.6566645e-8,0.0066837613,0.000021223885,0.00022234765,0.02094884,0.0012654726,0.96128744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010940498,0.0018258382,0.43511227,0.0008876337,0.000035774887,0.000021615118,0.079775125,0.009829041,0.002682417,0.010372498,0.45795238,0.00041133733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005126275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.9859138e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96087605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015658412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016301156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9914934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2276732892","doi":"10.3138/jelis.56.4.298","title":"Academically Informed Creative Writing in LIS Programs and the Freedom to be Creative","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Digital Storytelling and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"CBC (Canada); Toronto Public Health; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Creative writing; Storytelling; Creative brief; Reading (process); Technical writing; Creative work; Perspective (graphical); Pedagogy; Professional writing; Inclusion (mineral); Critical thinking; Higher education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Narrative; Visual arts; Social science; Linguistics; Political science","score_opus":0.07957488697637277,"score_gpt":0.40513745412832336,"score_spread":0.3255625671519506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2276732892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.937472,0.00006554402,0.00030412752,0.014661439,0.0006233458,0.0010003165,0.0000029959422,0.000010384103,0.045859862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917107,0.00007160658,0.0033695088,0.0039818054,0.0001946404,0.00010032685,0.000009627265,0.0000033766114,0.00055840024],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877995,0.00007069814,0.0006857098,0.00006199603,0.0002399521,0.00016167025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983881,0.000411765,0.0005054719,0.000064850276,0.00039503636,0.00023474003],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019603195,0.00006477552,0.00013230626,0.00035972876,0.00033445706,0.00017650196,0.00017979092,0.000045555465,0.000008607469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020748293,0.000040993615,0.0000174409,0.0006544946,0.00022417409,0.019278187,0.000054375436,0.00022947833,0.0000033160586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013107844,0.00023500258,0.09732365,0.00011175978,0.00001376491,6.9402866e-8,0.6405987,0.00008610528,0.000009392593,0.10682548,0.0195278,0.13395748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027281712,0.00074869226,0.1047651,0.00046619136,0.000015837846,0.000010934482,0.60659546,0.0007197613,0.00004559197,0.006354812,0.27739066,0.00015877797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002033802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014065804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25786287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058837115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002198285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99443865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314679983","doi":"10.3138/jelis.57.2.84","title":"Envisioning Our Information Future and How to Educate for it","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principal (computer security); Curriculum; Process (computing); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Library science; Sociology; Higher education; Political science; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.01726017679273686,"score_gpt":0.23002894146841862,"score_spread":0.21276876467568176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314679983","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16324733,0.000059931903,0.02138921,0.64336854,0.0067358306,0.0013057933,0.00032317275,0.000037506237,0.1635327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854124,0.00010171294,0.0047840914,0.0061182273,0.0008170186,0.000027261525,0.000024019206,0.000002751648,0.002712487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995038,0.0000034310851,0.00022184785,0.000041919073,0.00013886952,0.00009016335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994104,0.000049320097,0.00024022277,0.000040559204,0.00014934082,0.000110160356],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018495289,0.000055364413,0.0000631154,0.000385253,0.00029847052,0.00095444336,0.00011572327,0.0000064103415,0.000013226454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007221306,0.000033707398,0.000028219536,0.00006233588,0.00006688955,0.05895698,0.000029180688,0.000021415519,0.0000047819944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032045915,0.000011822042,0.000013042882,0.00003445812,0.0000034190862,4.4086668e-9,0.0053847716,0.0000013884783,0.0000104856645,0.7306613,0.030459177,0.23338808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019566112,0.00019150131,0.0023207793,0.00006734663,0.000004834132,0.0000053153353,0.012114927,0.000029455152,0.000097679374,0.016314289,0.9685964,0.00006179671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":1.1431735e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.555998e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93813723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007382252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016844299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9542049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333120627","doi":"10.3138/jelis.57.2.131","title":"On the Evolution of Library and Information Science Doctoral Dissertation Topics in North America (1960–2013)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Information science; Library science; Doctoral dissertation; Field (mathematics); Interdisciplinarity; Documentation science; Sociology; Higher education; Political science; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.013962701904622355,"score_gpt":0.22110841581160068,"score_spread":0.20714571390697833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333120627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195605,0.00001267129,0.0002639518,0.009101433,0.0003934624,0.00018366259,0.000029091863,0.0000065391146,0.07044868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862146,0.000114218245,0.00022214129,0.0007345637,0.00006035993,0.00000684158,0.000011628434,0.0000012652977,0.00022753754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925095,0.0000087384005,0.0003649261,0.000046875382,0.00024206378,0.00008644925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993297,0.00010352435,0.00037351486,0.000059550213,0.00007946841,0.000054268126],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014052934,0.000053471977,0.00006367103,0.00062442134,0.00022858032,0.0003952602,0.00018890532,0.000005467948,0.000034127224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007390426,0.000029318475,0.000020378291,0.0003212641,0.000598895,0.10623784,0.000034206794,0.000037071914,0.0000028577276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041187883,0.000028112525,0.0009123635,0.000021748298,0.00000151505,9.8490185e-9,0.004552679,0.00001331311,0.000012888927,0.95478636,0.00030286284,0.03932695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005015677,0.00062901824,0.5725937,0.00022489863,0.000009051205,0.000004784336,0.011867796,0.0007836896,0.00046936815,0.09622183,0.31652722,0.00016710449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000015677826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.7300373e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85856456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013628594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003160369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90626276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235666162","doi":"","title":"Library and Information Science Doctoral Education: The Landscape from 1930-2007","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Professionalization; Information science; Accreditation; Sociology; Library history; Political science; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.011086650415480213,"score_gpt":0.2855518006405946,"score_spread":0.27446515022511436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235666162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51152134,0.0007509505,0.00041598652,0.10073654,0.006011889,0.00095775444,0.000046310975,0.000100898134,0.3794583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393079,0.0018005264,0.0063025295,0.050679665,0.0011167945,0.000013049908,0.000066407076,0.0000039653482,0.0007091195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789655,0.000044573768,0.00081053015,0.000116336334,0.0008283971,0.00030363357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803054,0.00017641814,0.00086444296,0.00020022523,0.000325435,0.00040291288],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012187554,0.00012632304,0.0001425106,0.0010460322,0.0018810891,0.0039600655,0.0009668454,0.000061085666,0.0002467139],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003931381,0.00008881434,0.000050990224,0.002449442,0.0011207063,0.59138805,0.00008375537,0.00016855806,0.000015342259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004582469,0.000041832995,0.0031272618,0.000011752077,0.0000023339035,2.9436789e-8,0.019267984,0.000011569566,0.000019809184,0.83316857,0.01768951,0.12661354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022224161,0.00014983753,0.05783424,0.00005526721,0.0000074240224,0.000015736616,0.021422302,0.00039376318,0.0003605676,0.008104756,0.91129297,0.00014089262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000046796263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.4556795e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89360344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002122814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065650507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W241377492","doi":"","title":"Examining the Limits of Free Expression through Canadian Case Law: Reflections on the Canadian Library Association's Code of Ethics and Its Supporting Statement on Intellectual Freedom","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Intellectual freedom; Law; Ethical code; Context (archaeology); Statement (logic); Political science; Sociology; Freedom of association; Freedom of information; Human rights; Censorship","score_opus":0.19651357000822958,"score_gpt":0.42563469105890167,"score_spread":0.2291211210506721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W241377492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47536874,0.0001325992,0.00006957148,0.28534135,0.0023386863,0.00062325917,0.0001385902,0.000011315554,0.23597589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991439,0.0001507441,0.0008355156,0.0070621134,0.0001759091,0.0000099858735,0.000007725467,0.0000035453297,0.00031548736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857306,0.00021619046,0.0005410342,0.00005460209,0.00040714486,0.00020797543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954736,0.0026977644,0.0010094278,0.000114266455,0.00047745905,0.00022742985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037791573,0.00006259162,0.00008304107,0.00036601367,0.0024945838,0.00042526147,0.00027086868,0.000076018725,0.00016292016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009355954,0.00004202011,0.000022664766,0.0008648726,0.00024212114,0.023651473,0.000022146296,0.00043454225,0.000001545536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001199257,0.000033087654,0.0009047943,0.000012363997,0.00000762062,6.2471464e-8,0.1752809,0.000024611303,0.000048232603,0.80100965,0.022152577,0.00051413284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013265527,0.0001469934,0.0022339597,0.000095848896,0.000017026707,0.0000202107,0.14406122,0.00005618656,0.0041968557,0.0024961284,0.8464567,0.00008623613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015611044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016450573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8243041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001251452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009417426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460980628","doi":"10.2307/40323988","title":"LIS Distance Education: Modes and Plans","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Distance education; Library science; Higher education; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.010158678622290198,"score_gpt":0.22425683821049963,"score_spread":0.21409815958820944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460980628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42881942,0.007404116,0.1609632,0.09449293,0.0054673688,0.0009150922,0.000041074723,0.00017371406,0.3017231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95474255,0.0007308423,0.03934077,0.0043339403,0.00015939142,0.0000064498918,0.0000033001363,0.0000022159074,0.0006805156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929637,0.000010804143,0.0003192015,0.00008432798,0.00018604053,0.00010325555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923974,0.00005697423,0.0003118116,0.00013200565,0.00010654087,0.00015289857],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017199875,0.0000648368,0.00008057409,0.00033469318,0.00023780177,0.0009019044,0.0005012582,0.000022130585,0.00002542018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030919615,0.000051952415,0.00002114305,0.0005595218,0.000096876785,0.09991183,0.000062826315,0.000057867896,0.0000029263483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006591732,0.00005635333,0.0019489741,0.000049828755,0.0000022966788,3.716324e-8,0.0025662906,0.000013643813,0.00004139885,0.8824086,0.007983904,0.10492205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030198353,0.00021465447,0.025317766,0.000113518945,0.000006146761,0.00015588039,0.0027264573,0.03378183,0.001523133,0.014709401,0.92094356,0.00020569013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":3.5043595e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.042996e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91295964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000057206275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004196466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9126772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610581105","doi":"10.3138/jelis.58.2.112","title":"Mindfulness Meditation in the Classroom","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Meditation; Mindfulness; Contemplation; Mindfulness meditation; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Psychotherapist; The Internet; Pedagogy; Epistemology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031233852066201093,"score_gpt":0.3603978780592234,"score_spread":0.3291640259930223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610581105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7791845,0.00008768312,0.051697344,0.027427992,0.007910831,0.00039614865,0.000014881554,0.0000067643823,0.13327384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984449,0.0000011301933,0.00028576612,0.0006232803,0.00013388293,0.00012242788,0.0000029357823,0.0000012397735,0.00038443715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993206,0.000026424095,0.00036360626,0.00004317898,0.0001672806,0.00007886397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998966,0.000087300716,0.0006304507,0.00016849276,0.00010467371,0.00004311791],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007358783,0.000038802646,0.000061211584,0.0003042314,0.0004527217,0.0004910248,0.000512917,0.000024223413,0.00043673094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017880069,0.000024650195,0.000036961057,0.00015671563,0.00014761773,0.019649602,0.000021903728,0.000081628175,0.0000073253445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003272597,0.0000646746,0.001400476,0.00000880279,0.0000020708771,8.896801e-8,0.001949871,0.000001915115,0.0000017104634,0.8351368,0.020650504,0.14075038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081546284,0.00023031289,0.4945141,0.00011873236,0.000011731185,0.00009380374,0.029647203,0.00029651128,0.0012291741,0.08527572,0.3876617,0.000105541876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001418928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.588539e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74986106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005509802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022329499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99406207},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261114461","doi":"","title":"What It Means to Be an iSchool","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Agency (philosophy); Library science; Curriculum; Sociology; Information science; Political science; Public relations; Social science; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.02024739560080406,"score_gpt":0.2804607808811578,"score_spread":0.2602133852803537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261114461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6015106,0.0006830832,0.13766345,0.21355164,0.014688683,0.000691148,0.000008030393,0.000098445606,0.031104924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.799358,0.00026243026,0.12579145,0.0734859,0.00059593556,0.00001040132,0.000007807972,0.000004495402,0.00048355688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912465,0.000017615572,0.00034635418,0.000065940294,0.00027177468,0.00017365896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998977,0.00004324243,0.00026480953,0.00017418427,0.00011965956,0.0004210927],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005636482,0.000063666135,0.00007762547,0.0004635556,0.00020541344,0.0017698772,0.0008034301,0.000022158034,0.000034466924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041320818,0.000049740083,0.000027307673,0.0007582877,0.000037181995,0.49923828,0.00009541524,0.000058388225,0.0000099542685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027514103,0.00013128371,0.0018594502,0.000038868126,0.000004734726,3.8171756e-8,0.03305925,0.00006780022,0.00036912132,0.8539944,0.022041138,0.08840638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013371531,0.00022710142,0.013307348,0.000040584007,0.000003031204,0.000043790064,0.0073489505,0.0019557176,0.0036004717,0.0018944448,0.97132856,0.000116287454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.718919e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.067465e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9492874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000072391285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005308886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611220931","doi":"10.3138/jelis.58.2.94","title":"Re-envisioning Management Education and Training for Information Professionals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"University Challenges and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Professional development; Curriculum; Accreditation; Public relations; Political science; Certificate; Sociology; Medical education; Library science; Pedagogy; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.03675766833115415,"score_gpt":0.35480471158305604,"score_spread":0.3180470432519019,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611220931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33766434,0.00039192973,0.011727831,0.090643264,0.0077975355,0.0024225777,0.00003108112,0.000044798227,0.54927665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9788837,0.0011602098,0.016559727,0.0014417535,0.00024880658,0.000012451024,0.000011211493,0.0000021967255,0.0016799499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930847,0.000010193155,0.00027925527,0.00004752812,0.00023567224,0.00011889554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998779,0.000051826042,0.0007141218,0.000081635095,0.0002447222,0.00012867524],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093127514,0.00004883257,0.00007592681,0.0003708761,0.0024052202,0.0010069058,0.00027295822,0.000040347084,0.000009816104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002287897,0.000037742197,0.000029764235,0.00010888366,0.00023123306,0.08873123,0.000051750336,0.000051351202,5.971781e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030460269,0.000026596095,0.00021602472,0.000069910755,0.000004558173,8.325428e-9,0.03672814,0.0000024289473,0.0000028121535,0.4939221,0.0013420444,0.4676549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032939465,0.000077949975,0.014144611,0.00017647448,0.0000110446,0.0000025156226,0.23746629,0.00011275515,0.000046302644,0.0068415035,0.7407124,0.00007873759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000024652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":4.84825e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7393704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025398725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010346118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611530812","doi":"10.3138/jelis.58.2.106","title":"Reflecting on Bilingual Library and Information Science Education in an MIS program in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Information science; Educational program; Bilingual education; Library science; Field (mathematics); Dual (grammatical number); Higher education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Mathematics education; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.028568602528041585,"score_gpt":0.38274581107222755,"score_spread":0.35417720854418594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611530812","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92437613,0.000030321813,0.0000086363025,0.0071870685,0.0012920031,0.0004896494,0.0000057677494,0.000015796428,0.066594616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990059,0.0002719124,0.0040590996,0.005297307,0.00015834342,0.0000140820275,0.000015414058,0.0000030274355,0.00012179116],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980437,0.000042434433,0.00081906276,0.00012630135,0.00065472885,0.00031375338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980936,0.00010380789,0.0010401802,0.00021432579,0.0002133704,0.00033473878],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013750339,0.00010532765,0.00013911199,0.0015741645,0.0014948944,0.003502528,0.0008833754,0.000045864104,0.000026360804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000924743,0.00009301684,0.000019937776,0.0013500579,0.0006715674,0.5928366,0.00007230943,0.0001815687,0.0000014912049],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007726155,0.00009578586,0.09077103,0.000048346752,8.936382e-7,1.2377178e-7,0.020064956,0.0000525746,0.000031732274,0.37982348,0.00039544477,0.5086384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005737561,0.00035440005,0.56218475,0.0002870454,0.0000030487745,0.000011850863,0.06463109,0.0026923702,0.0011725904,0.0022946484,0.36551633,0.000278101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029362324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056416553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58933413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012348157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04412704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620108358","doi":"10.3138/jelis.59.1-2.03","title":"Looking Back, Moving Forward","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centennial; Milestone; Library science; Sociology; Classics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.019190655662745994,"score_gpt":0.31568279652580866,"score_spread":0.2964921408630627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620108358","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52099675,0.00007984623,0.006534998,0.020086255,0.0042793197,0.0003772285,0.0000051748207,0.000031203614,0.44760922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98492223,0.00011290652,0.010259216,0.0027592075,0.0007760789,0.000001913578,0.0000025741638,0.0000018593444,0.0011640226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910134,0.000020431735,0.00033525747,0.000059699807,0.00033055953,0.00015272696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990653,0.000068137895,0.00038759588,0.00006062432,0.00024468626,0.00017370081],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009184765,0.00004467169,0.00006430212,0.0003416724,0.0008387711,0.0007751184,0.00031301423,0.000029311035,0.00020252768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030450113,0.000037358288,0.000030673888,0.0007600057,0.0006304588,0.10638519,0.000025038291,0.000047669822,0.000015533647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037847014,0.00003553868,0.0071110693,0.000020344745,0.0000029518012,4.3046327e-8,0.023040196,0.0000033360584,0.00043070797,0.8740665,0.011630892,0.08362063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013703285,0.00021556701,0.006749607,0.000045241122,0.00000386953,0.000008106067,0.014742867,0.00020822382,0.0037554225,0.009391069,0.96465796,0.00008504649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001947064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.4479282e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95302707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014305515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025024174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9061133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744249297","doi":"10.3138/jelis.58.3.176","title":"The Creative Deliverable: A Short Communication","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliverable; Scholarship; Perspective (graphical); Point (geometry); Computer science; Mathematics education; Engineering; Psychology; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0213403253274486,"score_gpt":0.341154286035688,"score_spread":0.31981396070823936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744249297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17994478,0.0005252358,0.0012973859,0.09108491,0.0027866005,0.0007383104,0.000013381154,0.000032106,0.72357726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864125,0.0036013792,0.004055046,0.0034886692,0.00019558863,0.000013142801,0.0000060788107,0.000002091303,0.0022254933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989673,0.000040397117,0.00042570572,0.000043618562,0.0003737301,0.00014923717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822277,0.00019268105,0.0007197004,0.00025353985,0.00046292032,0.0001483622],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018446937,0.000049798975,0.00006890228,0.00018538845,0.006853815,0.0036708997,0.0011995026,0.000027979626,0.0000369486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011551947,0.000033203716,0.000036777015,0.00026421977,0.0012431623,0.29615793,0.000080335325,0.000086865926,0.0000042479205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023369617,0.000011112211,0.0018473378,0.000004219592,0.0000026045986,9.166224e-9,0.010647765,0.0000032973949,0.000006983535,0.8651344,0.007623208,0.1146957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100676596,0.00004045243,0.02783225,0.000031514955,0.00000348819,0.000003687344,0.01680405,0.00020083219,0.00027843364,0.006670541,0.9479793,0.000054803262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008451835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.0481957e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9403561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019328312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018816562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884457462","doi":"10.3138/jelis.59.1-2.05","title":"Awareness of Altmetrics among LIS Scholars and Faculty","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Library science; Higher education; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3458624147787211,"score_gpt":0.5465233660001863,"score_spread":0.20066095122146516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884457462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885651,0.00018884511,0.004870232,0.00074981374,0.0008420832,0.00012400893,0.000024125704,0.000003088337,0.004632704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922206,0.00030332527,0.006890776,0.00025058642,0.000084702355,0.0000015939042,0.0000027381,0.0000018155946,0.000243873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961375,0.000033219083,0.00087246206,0.00013154584,0.002653037,0.0001722116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929344,0.00082328875,0.0010510994,0.00018372027,0.0046722535,0.0003352251],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009302679,0.000063328436,0.00016711066,0.03249646,0.00037134407,0.0024334155,0.00097485137,0.000046615954,0.000059712183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018748032,0.00004158217,0.000047260026,0.06380589,0.0007496789,0.05961771,0.00021765538,0.00010031012,0.0000038993567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055504264,0.00008984932,0.60766083,0.00002678958,0.0000064498804,6.7760816e-8,0.0015337127,0.000008476522,0.00041240256,0.025585035,0.01034059,0.35428032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003434852,0.0004731512,0.8599209,0.000027177544,0.000004875361,0.000019796216,0.0026989246,0.0030604445,0.010054627,0.0066076615,0.11669835,0.000090619964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000023785526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.926079e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3541897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014766601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012782189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887204237","doi":"10.3138/jelis.59.3.2018-0008.08","title":"Does Interdisciplinary Integration Affect LIS Doctoral Students’ Publishing Productivity and Quality in North America?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Productivity; Library science; Affect (linguistics); Quality (philosophy); Discipline; Political science; Sociology; Medical education; Social science; Economic growth; Medicine; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.26239301872770476,"score_gpt":0.5439334882733927,"score_spread":0.28154046954568795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887204237","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892758,0.000052226806,0.0027424772,0.0048757168,0.0014021916,0.0002375069,0.000013792072,0.0000052087303,0.0013950584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701726,0.000078200785,0.0022287997,0.00029691833,0.00020900481,0.000005988971,0.000005595543,0.0000018994551,0.00015631862],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591947,0.00012960819,0.00093510334,0.00021939054,0.0025873384,0.0002090855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955623,0.00099402,0.00094008504,0.0002208977,0.002018234,0.0002644752],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013275353,0.000082955296,0.00019088098,0.01966197,0.00037373978,0.009070433,0.0011687599,0.000037692433,0.000037642854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018104022,0.000043992713,0.000042691147,0.040691335,0.0005611408,0.12129998,0.0006390553,0.0001917366,0.0000032971036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102553335,0.000117161784,0.58356655,0.000013122946,0.0000024087512,6.448019e-8,0.004882431,0.0000035175078,0.00016576753,0.0025536816,0.0019062114,0.40668654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002492913,0.00035028686,0.9724027,0.000022088016,0.0000017178064,0.0000053915314,0.006239845,0.00067389064,0.0008878212,0.0035987599,0.015488055,0.000080143436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000064555834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009249073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4066064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004786398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065437716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99195826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896631614","doi":"10.3138/jelis.59.3.2018-0017.07","title":"Teaching Information Behavior with the Information Horizon Interview","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Educational Research and Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Turnkey; Horizon; Population; Information literacy; Information behavior; Library science; Information science; Information seeking; Higher education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02308500900270023,"score_gpt":0.35948609560015654,"score_spread":0.3364010865974563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896631614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5675573,0.00018468601,0.032759473,0.17108607,0.0024642006,0.0016619619,0.000037675658,0.00006719367,0.22418149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99247926,0.00018731137,0.0033098925,0.0031800477,0.00046456288,0.000034579985,0.000026683776,0.0000019609513,0.00031570188],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986031,0.00007904566,0.00044205264,0.000038198876,0.00066173053,0.00017588129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979846,0.00013486412,0.0006296354,0.000097319156,0.0009788964,0.00017469101],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002496191,0.00006516076,0.0000829509,0.0006098012,0.0014452457,0.0011691445,0.00043400144,0.00003126867,0.00008924498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00062938733,0.000040460454,0.000042937725,0.0008621378,0.0006177559,0.117290854,0.000034823006,0.00014640951,0.000020420517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052380936,0.00004088515,0.00089850515,0.00003468515,0.0000101602645,1.2030105e-8,0.035948537,0.0000031938373,0.000016010563,0.39000788,0.01122284,0.5617649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001425856,0.00030294378,0.0068704407,0.00004524032,0.000018105844,0.0000074618065,0.044541072,0.00008518865,0.0001385113,0.00067718286,0.9471041,0.00006718481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029106333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030320016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93588126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047658155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025267766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909420809","doi":"10.3138/jelis.59.4.2018-0013","title":"Education for the Common Good: A Student Perspective on Including Social Justice in LIS Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University; American Library Association","keywords":"Accreditation; Curriculum; Sociology; Social justice; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); Pedagogy; Economic Justice; Relevance (law); Library science; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social science; Engineering; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04424668167184352,"score_gpt":0.41803252806689056,"score_spread":0.37378584639504703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909420809","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6344314,0.00026033766,0.0010004857,0.119464725,0.011380458,0.0020472237,0.000016347753,0.000031688578,0.2313673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901976,0.00013417633,0.001266842,0.0057602623,0.0018962715,0.000053783406,0.000007715541,0.000003405903,0.0006799583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987749,0.000058693444,0.00044310195,0.00011220926,0.00042924596,0.00018189116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837315,0.00031629385,0.00057012046,0.00008556477,0.0005438994,0.00011095122],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014042549,0.00007910064,0.00010019223,0.00050094374,0.0018755911,0.00080024864,0.00047741397,0.000049531413,0.000026932988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050977437,0.00006028174,0.000047733003,0.0010968926,0.0005123289,0.03290627,0.00003135622,0.0001050903,0.000003273766],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006945766,0.00020523516,0.0014301214,0.000016124619,0.000002732787,6.134094e-9,0.05121508,0.0000045308966,0.000047719084,0.8915807,0.008977536,0.046450786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034235796,0.0005731911,0.061422393,0.00011395431,0.000032364485,0.000004832832,0.3841384,0.0002434861,0.0007800863,0.029808128,0.5223753,0.00016554227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022075876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008222114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86177254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014529758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007889114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914330407","doi":"10.3138/jelis.60.1.2018-0005","title":"Diffusion of KM Education in LIS Schools","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Inclusion (mineral); China; Principal (computer security); Knowledge sharing; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Knowledge management; Social science","score_opus":0.009959216794783584,"score_gpt":0.3011341974501046,"score_spread":0.29117498065532105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914330407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8742933,0.00008981876,0.00008355262,0.0012614861,0.0010869792,0.00021964477,7.811689e-7,0.0000037377317,0.12296069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963678,0.00027588315,0.0013867507,0.0002658463,0.00009726469,0.0000029786186,0.0000034260866,0.0000013345224,0.0015986867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927384,0.000019085483,0.00035326317,0.000043106822,0.0002246317,0.00008608131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927473,0.000045038178,0.000379276,0.00005789735,0.00017717629,0.000065872475],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079125445,0.00003452912,0.00007710146,0.000659762,0.00012312741,0.00017974207,0.00022347194,0.000024399158,0.00008360783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022141935,0.000030376877,0.00002516628,0.00067873485,0.00007312638,0.029231474,0.00003224569,0.000057869078,0.0000061919645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045203287,0.00015444036,0.18223338,0.000116720425,0.0000025566817,9.538167e-9,0.020494286,0.000016507429,0.00051186205,0.6059576,0.0031468654,0.18732052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058013736,0.00016433273,0.27048403,0.00040142544,0.000008787041,0.0000017245167,0.07882996,0.00053219986,0.001367181,0.011387912,0.63608724,0.00015506167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000069375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.654944e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6329404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024267476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018776513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98434615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980353621","doi":"10.3138/jelis.2018-0068","title":"Can (Post-Heroic) Leadership Be Taught (Online)? A Library Educator’s Expansion of Baldwin, Ching, and Friesen’s Grounded Theory Model of Online Course Design and Development","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Online and Blended Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Grounded theory; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Educational leadership; Pedagogy; Leadership development; Leadership studies; Experiential learning; Leadership style; Psychology; Public relations; Qualitative research; Social science; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04474835335589848,"score_gpt":0.3064428738102955,"score_spread":0.261694520454397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980353621","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.987261,0.00043622163,0.0009425144,0.009938044,0.00024702091,0.00028693245,0.00001978331,0.000009682179,0.000858807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93142337,0.0005149653,0.06648576,0.00084196596,0.00008769479,0.0000027570918,0.000032792115,0.0000062058793,0.0006044759],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874187,0.000089642126,0.00055076083,0.00009689199,0.00035653278,0.00016430649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986076,0.0002217394,0.0007076603,0.00007993378,0.00021231068,0.00017075177],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010434658,0.00009266826,0.00018198286,0.00037265816,0.00029101083,0.0001547923,0.00022398685,0.000062640494,0.000043420267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019596033,0.00007609615,0.000027883052,0.0003417026,0.00041168707,0.01872925,0.00005174106,0.00013804687,2.1386037e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008743126,0.0011953219,0.024602724,0.0012171294,0.000076019416,2.2026124e-7,0.2966629,0.0013956024,0.005078199,0.27592978,0.00249751,0.3904703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002152013,0.0011456625,0.051603563,0.0011417965,0.0000772319,0.000037346275,0.8388767,0.012609155,0.01470271,0.015217777,0.061747152,0.00068885565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000043708637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014140737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54221386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016477714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008716897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99690276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980895756","doi":"10.3138/jelis.2018-0040","title":"A Comparative Study of LIS Accreditation Frameworks in Australia, New Zealand, United States, and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Curriculum; Library science; Political science; Professional association; Information science; Sociology; Medical education; Public relations; Pedagogy; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.020246535869920868,"score_gpt":0.32534358872001035,"score_spread":0.3050970528500895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980895756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99548674,0.000014772096,0.000029082765,0.0024704672,0.0005491067,0.0003551812,0.0000073731358,0.0000030321291,0.0010842428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967902,0.00010007063,0.0008434372,0.0013472489,0.000052033338,0.000002587703,0.000022708937,0.0000010555154,0.0008406986],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880695,0.00004131894,0.000564594,0.00005745754,0.00040507517,0.00012461787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987797,0.00017898538,0.00059497636,0.000062884625,0.00022119255,0.00016225003],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056436006,0.00005693691,0.0001350129,0.000640644,0.00014071578,0.00029843667,0.00022981457,0.000039786893,0.00007263243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011922377,0.000047651753,0.000012047083,0.0011787344,0.00012106927,0.09002812,0.000023378958,0.00012674557,9.359035e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021715416,0.0002012082,0.34212378,0.00006114294,0.000013330354,1.2574918e-7,0.5148727,0.0014109635,0.000022922046,0.09485773,0.03882336,0.007395554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010831854,0.0005947001,0.31726083,0.00011266034,0.000006777336,0.0000037019738,0.3353639,0.0012515809,0.00016026053,0.0027986283,0.34121284,0.00015092672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025440698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011349123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30238947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028800478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003100256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.981049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W298921313","doi":"","title":"Library and Information Science Education-Discipline Profession, Vocation?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Sociology; Field (mathematics); Vocational education; Pluralism (philosophy); Information science; Engineering ethics; Professional association; Library science; Social science; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009597104950728222,"score_gpt":0.3281469733540697,"score_spread":0.3185498684033415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W298921313","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5701689,0.0004367433,0.004968953,0.06248285,0.0078569995,0.0016679236,0.00003022161,0.00015267366,0.35223472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94965595,0.0015200863,0.0242382,0.021569593,0.0008096447,0.000022090215,0.00007940815,0.000008327107,0.0020966786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727696,0.000036100053,0.0012004694,0.00013860539,0.00095066626,0.00039719112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704695,0.00021358118,0.0012245924,0.00019723967,0.00070032774,0.0006173277],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030102823,0.0001400508,0.00015996619,0.0023945016,0.0021908153,0.0022821384,0.0008109022,0.000081014034,0.00012381043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080337166,0.00011629162,0.00004655513,0.0038039645,0.0015535037,0.6457247,0.0001537947,0.00017593233,0.000014140763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045132572,0.00005165139,0.00453496,0.000045796907,0.0000018401505,1.9014013e-8,0.017667538,0.0000037111818,0.000071938826,0.8761976,0.0031144025,0.09826544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028902202,0.00011694734,0.06592001,0.0001145096,0.000007413843,0.000021487382,0.046698928,0.00018742352,0.0017677027,0.0073326,0.87735194,0.00019202402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000029314624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.7022564e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87423754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004226936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013420604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997637071","doi":"10.3138/jelis.61.1.2018-0003","title":"Multimedia Approaches to Learning the Foundations of Library and Information Science","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Video Analysis and Summarization","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deliverable; Computer science; Class (philosophy); Multimedia; Field (mathematics); World Wide Web; Engineering","score_opus":0.03931639097218285,"score_gpt":0.24725203790801234,"score_spread":0.2079356469358295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997637071","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13856737,0.0001404376,0.7525263,0.09333287,0.00077518634,0.000693909,0.0000083154255,0.000057431484,0.013898175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9386644,0.00016235426,0.057560757,0.0035029966,0.00006687185,0.0000067769074,0.000010195648,0.0000019335848,0.000023743029],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987927,0.000025590974,0.00057304325,0.00009017291,0.00040186313,0.00011660858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876255,0.00012149647,0.00061495736,0.000120859244,0.00017666383,0.0002034498],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006625945,0.00006845304,0.00011044146,0.000682128,0.00051157724,0.0012622812,0.0007032888,0.000021217722,0.000007500183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005720918,0.000047830436,0.000034010933,0.0027334066,0.00027222832,0.18434274,0.00021170314,0.000095719784,0.0000023368227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025623487,0.00002456654,0.0039367005,0.000057018682,0.000007005116,1.5853065e-8,0.019727917,0.0023267816,0.00054114213,0.7892314,0.0005706037,0.18355119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046443014,0.0004968549,0.057997473,0.0000735366,0.000024407285,0.000021738195,0.00759753,0.72423303,0.010680306,0.0024948074,0.19567943,0.00023646274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.7284034e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.26558e-9,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.800097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000062487493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010350577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998153594","doi":"10.3138/jelis.61.1.2018-0047","title":"How Far Apart Are L and M? The Institutional and Publishing Disconnects between LIS and Museum Studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Publication; Discipline; Scholarly communication; The arts; Political science; Higher education; Sociology; Social science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4553739326490477,"score_gpt":0.48933954987135586,"score_spread":0.033965617222308175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998153594","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.748202,0.004225932,0.0021538222,0.24372672,0.0004115055,0.00032090527,0.00003033845,0.0000054562242,0.00092328375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932217,0.0026366895,0.001246011,0.002674608,0.00016227935,0.0000052518244,0.0000017853274,0.0000013596609,0.000050336654],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757063,0.000051730232,0.0004799883,0.00014763194,0.001607473,0.00014252424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995568,0.0021764485,0.00064905756,0.00009471438,0.0011525075,0.0003592847],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006166835,0.00006940569,0.0001930441,0.005587623,0.0007132712,0.013719428,0.00056116545,0.000030684805,0.000003858333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03466724,0.00003632368,0.000028048513,0.01508636,0.0010031478,0.083820745,0.00038815013,0.00014678428,4.389463e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018454443,0.000038723192,0.18216008,0.00013873968,0.000043938504,5.4313125e-7,0.016359212,0.000019605328,0.000073643794,0.33372667,0.03118082,0.43607348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016289871,0.00029750087,0.43216705,0.00007116552,0.000018328543,0.00007139281,0.045545354,0.0043820296,0.0003295163,0.023292772,0.49201953,0.00017637042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":6.1089384e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.1764234e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46083874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009283158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049657014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98730445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W300069632","doi":"","title":"Barriers and Challenges to Teaching Reference in Today's Electronic Information Environment","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Reference desk; Focus group; Digital reference; Computer science; Library science; Variety (cybernetics); Point (geometry); Library instruction; Information literacy; World Wide Web; Medical education; Sociology; Service (business); Medicine","score_opus":0.011558123409229537,"score_gpt":0.27416731818647755,"score_spread":0.26260919477724803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W300069632","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.872781,0.0001738833,0.0005622035,0.05113454,0.001044279,0.0005840087,0.000008822336,0.000023786413,0.07368747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874692,0.0020697417,0.0049209134,0.005318905,0.000101324564,0.0000143421075,0.0000055372293,0.0000018044847,0.00009825079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878675,0.000033775177,0.00051713263,0.00006646846,0.0003617731,0.00023410002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990886,0.00008887705,0.0003305969,0.000089682726,0.000079185054,0.00032304775],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019478465,0.000070581504,0.00009308244,0.00080342975,0.00051731593,0.0006337318,0.0003363202,0.00005121828,0.000079022466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006093336,0.000061034676,0.000017880313,0.0003610746,0.0002287724,0.22216643,0.000049709084,0.00022918243,0.0000084638095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019380504,0.000008414107,0.0014470554,0.000016515765,8.6168393e-7,1.0012796e-8,0.03152906,0.000013748629,0.00006141201,0.84291077,0.00033056323,0.1236622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015577271,0.00011162763,0.017075302,0.000022424365,0.000001472193,0.000005856238,0.022169353,0.00015014046,0.00014462958,0.0035401979,0.9565366,0.00008661619],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000593309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.5793207e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.956206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029851622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014486597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78871274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121750335","doi":"10.2307/40323997","title":"(Re)Positioning Librarians: How Young People View the Information Sector","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Information science; Higher education; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.01424660037596727,"score_gpt":0.2719611832138555,"score_spread":0.25771458283788823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121750335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22101651,0.0005091109,0.02073293,0.29202318,0.008773675,0.0019299731,0.000044276778,0.00016880642,0.45480153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9765754,0.0015467893,0.0037355486,0.016635751,0.00058531685,0.000027482161,0.000043574615,0.000004114908,0.00084607635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831784,0.00006374499,0.0006423282,0.0000642596,0.000655171,0.00025667544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814457,0.00018626239,0.0008912192,0.00014361655,0.00041240072,0.00022191122],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014377591,0.00009875907,0.00012604106,0.00060395146,0.0017465507,0.0035998896,0.00067728246,0.00005380239,0.00025358348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005082322,0.0000692117,0.000072505434,0.002000393,0.00035808096,0.4739153,0.00005347134,0.00013697874,0.000017935785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057339214,0.00003517662,0.012269683,0.000049857954,0.000008148857,5.093905e-8,0.105677396,0.0000580824,0.0000164187,0.7969083,0.027108857,0.057810675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019980712,0.00007914433,0.018877517,0.000055008786,0.000007107801,0.000025603269,0.05346046,0.0006440025,0.000110945366,0.0021682521,0.9242635,0.00010865595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000075491316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.7966947e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8971546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036936224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019931209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126030171","doi":"10.3138/jelis.61.4.2019-0048","title":"The Course <i>Information and Contemplation</i>, Student Word Clouds, and the Job Search","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Reflective Practices in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Contemplation; Point (geometry); Word (group theory); Course (navigation); Resource (disambiguation); Word processing; Psychology; Computer science; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02857236527643918,"score_gpt":0.38504700448923684,"score_spread":0.35647463921279765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126030171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5858337,0.0016346442,0.0023718805,0.34296212,0.0022273841,0.0014091753,0.000006837411,0.000023110015,0.06353109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907088,0.0035776973,0.0011628532,0.0041746176,0.0002727665,0.000015510499,0.0000022343197,0.0000018684503,0.00008365152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987777,0.00014187323,0.0004395296,0.000053897445,0.00046320516,0.0001237785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979337,0.00082455826,0.0005868909,0.00006737037,0.00042630488,0.00016120092],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029669837,0.0000570231,0.00008342325,0.00009489646,0.0017607434,0.0016995162,0.0002906217,0.00002807603,0.000008082141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012616529,0.000033969136,0.000021794895,0.00050960685,0.0010652607,0.045789756,0.000055952547,0.00014466951,0.0000022500078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025408983,0.000017480972,0.008547184,0.000021691438,0.000012982449,1.0734546e-8,0.12772614,0.000019768633,0.000011050102,0.70876956,0.0035556592,0.15106437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073731353,0.00009941995,0.06726335,0.000020970278,0.000022634678,0.000011012752,0.13523807,0.0007639472,0.00007057442,0.00500826,0.79068583,0.00007862813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007868397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.7702833e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7871302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022290415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013833512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137356233","doi":"10.3138/jelis.61.4.2019-0056","title":"How Master of Library Studies Students Learn to Search for Information: A Pilot Study","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Information seeking; Information literacy; Population; Mathematics education; Psychology; Information needs; Computer science; Library science; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.09426208247274642,"score_gpt":0.3773460792648613,"score_spread":0.2830839967921149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137356233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84708995,0.00015401757,0.003722619,0.13165645,0.0018278142,0.0033238702,0.00007617733,0.000060873655,0.012088219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974742,0.00017362753,0.0071637253,0.016866041,0.00033018307,0.000040745454,0.000014565724,0.000004450834,0.000664668],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978612,0.00005531922,0.00085051596,0.0000885741,0.0009013856,0.00024297906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979513,0.00020384263,0.0006833308,0.00010731496,0.0006487519,0.00040541956],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012034397,0.00010276708,0.00021750075,0.0007370457,0.00057729124,0.0018463128,0.0008737199,0.00002403652,0.000035088317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007394633,0.000082299775,0.00005417448,0.0017542852,0.00029477238,0.3184343,0.0001694172,0.00009024863,0.000007021897],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011457392,0.00045214637,0.052874796,0.00050399057,0.00006653681,1.08622615e-7,0.53895366,0.00018073265,0.00008491818,0.30217752,0.043662082,0.059897758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007936364,0.003559595,0.011582501,0.000063385865,0.000012715815,0.0000015553245,0.25847164,0.00013003443,0.0008929375,0.0004050464,0.72394395,0.00014300983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.66967e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.8093273e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6802819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001694919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017482392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W315113419","doi":"","title":"Doctoral Recruitment Factors : Results of a Survey of Deans and Directors","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Possession (linguistics); Economic shortage; Information science; Higher education; Sociology; Medical education; Political science; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.11722399341766457,"score_gpt":0.3506749558690169,"score_spread":0.23345096245135236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W315113419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9865109,0.000072546216,0.00006418464,0.00081105955,0.00053736294,0.00022906913,0.00005152669,0.0000057836196,0.011717606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726176,0.00063088886,0.0014708155,0.00027068626,0.00003294301,0.0000021135145,0.000018900817,0.0000013136572,0.00031060405],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985614,0.00004776847,0.0007994283,0.000055787586,0.00041368318,0.000121955374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804235,0.00027847887,0.0010313207,0.00007741006,0.00040540565,0.0001650102],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012972165,0.00005975263,0.00014608174,0.0005140283,0.00035217335,0.00010747519,0.0002586975,0.00003233177,0.00002325357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007689615,0.000045347846,0.000035269317,0.0010206018,0.0007309645,0.09653464,0.000030571235,0.000048665657,3.6088633e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042788597,0.00020120638,0.5542748,0.000117191055,0.00001855896,8.231062e-8,0.20272781,0.000044800156,0.0002483372,0.20493054,0.0072972295,0.029711565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037068015,0.00025247387,0.7982656,0.000051101448,0.0000039776432,0.0000052935425,0.008855814,0.00008045192,0.00354967,0.00041126125,0.18806958,0.00008410284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008111316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.210844e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2439908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012157462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015868739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9161017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189001966","doi":"10.34944/dspace/6786","title":"Attitudes and Perceptions toward Design Thinking in Graduate-Level Library Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Higher education; Graduate education; Graduate students; Sociology; Library instruction; Pedagogy; Library science; Psychology; Mathematics education; Information literacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.0669199692195248,"score_gpt":0.34383786695387764,"score_spread":0.2769178977343528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189001966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7937186,0.0011606636,0.011166297,0.10739583,0.004493218,0.0010374602,0.000031676875,0.000091332215,0.08090497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90873444,0.0031381666,0.07366949,0.012720307,0.00032339207,0.000019522755,0.000038844453,0.0000056188483,0.0013502027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986013,0.00008338687,0.00059325265,0.000101953105,0.00043203734,0.00018804584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886125,0.00017723853,0.00039990546,0.00009029402,0.0002549731,0.0002163152],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009982357,0.00008183596,0.00012090885,0.00072854914,0.00072387356,0.0016043029,0.00032607,0.0000508921,0.00015945862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042875035,0.00007341563,0.000037096346,0.0013876123,0.00034612254,0.24966799,0.000067628745,0.0001301604,0.000004788474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027617862,0.0001241235,0.019756684,0.00007671489,0.0000035095266,1.676888e-7,0.063682154,0.000036112677,0.00008223819,0.8271227,0.008383526,0.08070448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005096119,0.00015466803,0.40919003,0.0003808354,0.000011506063,0.000074921496,0.13215354,0.0005250348,0.0013069065,0.05667914,0.39867386,0.0003399416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000040323093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.7752691e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7704435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002490352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006944033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285420552","doi":"10.3138/jelis.2020-0028","title":"Attitudes and Perceptions toward Design Thinking in Graduate-Level Library Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Information Literacy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Curriculum; Coursework; Sociology; Higher education; Pedagogy; Accreditation; Perception; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Library science; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.0669199692195248,"score_gpt":0.34383786695387764,"score_spread":0.2769178977343528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285420552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7937186,0.0011606636,0.011166297,0.10739583,0.004493218,0.0010374602,0.000031676875,0.000091332215,0.08090497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90873444,0.0031381666,0.07366949,0.012720307,0.00032339207,0.000019522755,0.000038844453,0.0000056188483,0.0013502027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986013,0.00008338687,0.00059325265,0.000101953105,0.00043203734,0.00018804584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886125,0.00017723853,0.00039990546,0.00009029402,0.0002549731,0.0002163152],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009982357,0.00008183596,0.00012090885,0.00072854914,0.00072387356,0.0016043029,0.00032607,0.0000508921,0.00015945862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042875035,0.00007341563,0.000037096346,0.0013876123,0.00034612254,0.24966799,0.000067628745,0.0001301604,0.000004788474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027617862,0.0001241235,0.019756684,0.00007671489,0.0000035095266,1.676888e-7,0.063682154,0.000036112677,0.00008223819,0.8271227,0.008383526,0.08070448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005096119,0.00015466803,0.40919003,0.0003808354,0.000011506063,0.000074921496,0.13215354,0.0005250348,0.0013069065,0.05667914,0.39867386,0.0003399416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000040323093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.7752691e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7704435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002490352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006944033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394580089","doi":"10.3138/jelis-2023-0004","title":"Publication Output and Trends of LIS Faculty Teaching Health-Related Courses: Connecting Research, Teaching, and Practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Wikis in Education and Collaboration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Library science; Medical education; Sociology; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.07330422450472547,"score_gpt":0.4618377880631012,"score_spread":0.38853356355837576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394580089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3834355,0.0030405358,0.00173055,0.38342023,0.0031365294,0.0006833287,0.000040255884,0.000084692634,0.2244284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98799384,0.0005301546,0.009088161,0.0007902642,0.0001822895,0.0000072928606,0.000025508738,0.0000039275055,0.001378573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823785,0.00043570047,0.00060423755,0.00010346112,0.00047257496,0.00014619685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742633,0.0009774482,0.00064327085,0.00006785518,0.000703319,0.00018176589],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120373275,0.00005654375,0.000104612795,0.0010888714,0.0016723886,0.001371296,0.00015319257,0.00004932566,0.000019098461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009103124,0.000049531925,0.000019035642,0.0010746837,0.00036472073,0.0439507,0.000031869713,0.00035740936,7.41417e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144559035,0.000035475416,0.00011211795,0.000043776075,0.000005121865,1.4042742e-8,0.09796988,0.0000018949102,0.000024510791,0.5336905,0.013996469,0.3541058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119322445,0.00014696023,0.0025532611,0.00013858423,0.000008180576,0.000028402592,0.1724856,0.0005137254,0.00003939385,0.0027748926,0.8211336,0.000058045713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055496705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014910513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80713713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060213024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025150203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401014969","doi":"10.3138/jelis-2023-0032","title":"Envisioning a Paid Community Archives Internship Program: Challenges and Opportunities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Digital and Traditional Archives Management","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Internship; Restructuring; Public relations; Higher education; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Medical education; Pedagogy; Medicine","score_opus":0.115398585112339,"score_gpt":0.2818761496705564,"score_spread":0.1664775645582174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401014969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1515783,0.0017320323,0.00021727059,0.013415338,0.00093082915,0.00022200891,0.000027974018,0.00005008787,0.83182615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949377,0.0025509323,0.0007487346,0.0005053522,0.00014195545,0.000011047495,0.000016699321,0.000002305293,0.0010852662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957395,0.00001657413,0.00021029732,0.000034302382,0.00010196519,0.00006289223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961555,0.0001601221,0.00009368309,0.000037020673,0.00002618778,0.000067408735],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021691677,0.00004787272,0.00005519513,0.00035930576,0.00029607076,0.0011438219,0.000117748474,0.0000037237555,0.000017274066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019731622,0.000034258363,0.000025860485,0.000025795583,0.00041622148,0.02486381,0.0000506363,0.00008307061,0.0000010325331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064741357,0.000022112594,0.0000016550391,0.00010340434,0.0000040088717,5.905479e-8,0.02262828,2.2716533e-7,6.686612e-7,0.5444079,0.00017320638,0.432652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056456185,0.0003099884,0.0027657084,0.0002695232,0.000006790445,0.000019837542,0.0320788,0.00044928654,0.000015987192,0.14256653,0.8214069,0.00005420416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":2.8462094e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.7381536e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8433594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000022873032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012283266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408542743","doi":"10.3138/jelis-2023-0060","title":"(Re)designing an Online Course in Archival Science Using the ADDIE Model: Lessons Learned and Future Directions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Dental Research and COVID-19","field":"Dentistry","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"ADDIE Model; Instructional design; Course (navigation); Online course; Computer science; Mathematics education; Library science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Multimedia; Psychology; Engineering; Curriculum","score_opus":0.07749740933043547,"score_gpt":0.4251582171573126,"score_spread":0.34766080782687714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408542743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9802048,0.00027127008,0.006642424,0.008627569,0.00069838477,0.00019839825,0.00002542795,0.000010079947,0.0033216332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99317336,0.0003150438,0.0050755036,0.0011653453,0.00008163901,0.0000041426047,0.000005836609,0.0000020405062,0.00017705865],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911374,0.000029197025,0.00028768714,0.000088547065,0.00032408425,0.00015672324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929905,0.000121831166,0.0001832137,0.000105734536,0.00014097683,0.00014919146],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009223791,0.00005445409,0.00007259934,0.000651812,0.0007059669,0.0006370745,0.00033906297,0.000018141442,0.000009403931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035203993,0.000039054165,0.00002119508,0.001237713,0.00050019735,0.024406094,0.000080358404,0.00016953083,3.3789337e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042857465,0.0005906156,0.0072296797,0.00016237726,0.000014276258,0.0000012159152,0.011045073,0.005172379,0.0063125696,0.44838083,0.0022837862,0.5183786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017531746,0.00033583204,0.23124489,0.00032001556,0.00004593576,0.00019294508,0.08397441,0.55370986,0.003666218,0.07271568,0.051708147,0.00033286912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003658292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002519354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5485375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003662238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034571062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98923904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412701442","doi":"10.3138/jelis-2024-0061","title":"Fat Pedagogy in Action: Size Inclusivity in Public Library Health and Wellness Programming","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Pedagogy; Sociology; Library science; Political science; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.06027529212759984,"score_gpt":0.4834132206637337,"score_spread":0.42313792853613386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412701442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80294776,0.00081454177,0.00031868462,0.1774742,0.0018206098,0.00096068176,0.000004211673,0.000021909022,0.01563738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97397846,0.0034609209,0.003743666,0.01764059,0.00016276688,0.0000457551,0.000008549976,0.0000036796746,0.0009556108],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983953,0.00021506898,0.00088118465,0.00008982145,0.00015904398,0.0002595827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979261,0.0008802217,0.0008319814,0.00007975414,0.00008254653,0.00019936249],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017797737,0.000068171496,0.00018098233,0.0009789035,0.0008841803,0.00017526811,0.00017630514,0.00007703888,0.00007230534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008131802,0.000059482558,0.000015896483,0.0012515552,0.000110903056,0.06123166,0.00012845383,0.0004377468,0.0000024549372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002829322,0.00024224534,0.3730392,0.0027300296,0.0000036247218,1.8222795e-7,0.021198202,0.000004351704,0.000007875453,0.24743453,0.0067457333,0.3483111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065108645,0.00012084451,0.24841158,0.0005426333,0.0000017915895,0.000005082887,0.03134541,0.0001579447,0.000024988472,0.003958375,0.71471804,0.00006221095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000014900699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012660068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70797235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006290789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008108568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99751455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64604411","doi":"","title":"\"The Special Collection in Librarianship\": Researching the History of Library Science Libraries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Library Science and Administration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Microform; Staffing; Cataloging; School library; Collection development; Interlibrary loan; Subject (documents); Service (business); Special collections; Library catalog; Quarter (Canadian coin); Resource Description and Access; Computer science; Political science; History; Business","score_opus":0.04145643747033955,"score_gpt":0.3184163809715853,"score_spread":0.27695994350124575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64604411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48593658,0.0021020602,0.00022935584,0.060673516,0.016073119,0.0010221843,0.000006044556,0.00003798564,0.43391916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903153,0.00092430424,0.0021719034,0.0010490727,0.0015162544,0.0000117418995,0.0000028297552,0.0000044256512,0.0040041623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980978,0.00012441177,0.0005872555,0.00007971565,0.0007781581,0.00033266947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983392,0.00057659444,0.00060266926,0.00013616432,0.00012205606,0.00022333945],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038085785,0.00006764491,0.00009665844,0.00072956714,0.0015448784,0.0011412022,0.0009977132,0.000038539827,0.00007523775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011367324,0.00004284298,0.000042976575,0.0025880425,0.0034413242,0.2023541,0.000098617566,0.00017439922,0.0000017246772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008364069,0.000047644236,0.018224236,0.000012730874,0.0000014605338,2.8218773e-8,0.041198745,0.000003706689,0.00012805189,0.8927825,0.030341329,0.01717589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001482379,0.00010809784,0.069373414,0.00004297756,0.0000032519736,0.000006203009,0.032262307,0.0001227595,0.0017625814,0.012816007,0.88327354,0.000080597136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006608284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.789525e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87996656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075161086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015819866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W839445113","doi":"","title":"Investigating a Peer-to-Peer Community Service Learning Model for LIS Education.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Service-Learning and Community Engagement","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Practicum; Experiential learning; Curriculum; Pedagogy; Graduation (instrument); Professional development; Psychology; Higher education; Sociology; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.04850196818784655,"score_gpt":0.34072254700138543,"score_spread":0.2922205788135389,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W839445113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7961996,0.000034166584,0.042844556,0.08689286,0.001316074,0.00066881086,0.000006106144,0.000068335605,0.0719695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275929,0.000021180245,0.054573227,0.014640054,0.00023949426,0.000038979717,0.000029696694,0.0000061101523,0.0028583799],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866,0.00024040781,0.00038991583,0.00005419746,0.0004834962,0.00017196115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969206,0.00052793423,0.00047901706,0.00013911696,0.0016689032,0.00026445364],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005784643,0.0000716606,0.00010546034,0.0003862596,0.0029448897,0.0007019689,0.00060742203,0.00004183537,0.000013288433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039181095,0.00006898347,0.00003721019,0.0008101965,0.00011501909,0.015884222,0.00008169078,0.00032531348,0.000003707447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036431957,0.00019456235,0.0027155192,0.00021056981,0.000010238036,1.7620112e-9,0.45466626,0.015037941,0.0001879723,0.35710943,0.017787408,0.15204369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002242131,0.00016665632,0.0025528332,0.00013196204,0.00001392109,0.0000018092751,0.1693279,0.046741035,0.0001675202,0.008432213,0.7721038,0.00013614574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006853528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000065073245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7543164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004040888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024451928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W850138626","doi":"","title":"Mapping the Infoscape of LIS Courses for Intersections of Health-Gender and Health-Sexual Orientation Topics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education for Library and Information Science","topic":"Web and Library Services","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Taboo; Sociology; Sexual orientation; Psychology; Noun; Verb; Social psychology; Linguistics; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04140584030089315,"score_gpt":0.30603690473024303,"score_spread":0.26463106442934986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W850138626","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34091428,0.0008184015,0.5976301,0.05513932,0.002596814,0.0007391838,0.000016473803,0.000020804155,0.0021246164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96634203,0.00012760819,0.02966565,0.0037092427,0.00009970702,0.0000067594447,0.000006359165,0.0000017023913,0.00004091695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909633,0.000028882816,0.0005765768,0.00005824825,0.00015227459,0.00008767708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985559,0.000119127755,0.0009832929,0.000104289684,0.00017223087,0.000065184344],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009251801,0.000045929984,0.000114381015,0.00031372768,0.00024407679,0.0001601956,0.00030091187,0.000015532712,0.000002176306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060551443,0.00003265867,0.000023605344,0.0004645308,0.00009660394,0.0210105,0.000047668007,0.000040123297,7.75848e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018167739,0.000053233955,0.004678366,0.00047258934,0.000009365021,1.7967249e-9,0.034595657,0.00007364641,0.000097312346,0.69661146,0.0035201933,0.25987002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013216273,0.002615585,0.41826802,0.00031756688,0.00001117826,0.00006381528,0.0616528,0.041409362,0.0039667226,0.028182002,0.441939,0.0002523182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000437136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.192862e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66842943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000065017293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075494655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}