{"meta":{"query_hash":"ff301678b1f6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ff301678b1f6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+English+for+Academic+Purposes"},"results":[{"id":"W1986046641","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2014.08.003","title":"‘You’ and ‘I’ in university seminars and spoken learner discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Interpersonal communication; Task (project management); Linguistics; Computer science; Construct (python library); Pronoun; Repetition (rhetorical device); Point (geometry); Spoken language; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Communication","score_opus":0.014537156399292258,"score_gpt":0.2583829412180835,"score_spread":0.2438457848187912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986046641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9807426,0.0037151908,0.000023552779,0.00051444984,0.0003685565,0.000092156966,0.000016854896,0.000009828006,0.014516858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928968,0.0019156297,0.00013466235,0.000085140484,0.00140167,7.5481574e-7,0.0000013966691,0.000011242853,0.0035527116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928576,0.000049598402,0.000247714,0.0001181293,0.00013344038,0.00016536641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992254,0.0002202701,0.0002232241,0.00006260218,0.00020298787,0.00006553562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006099564,0.000110183304,0.0002988279,0.00021512786,0.00012608155,0.000047125555,0.00014760328,0.00005835335,0.000038787977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007861301,0.000087312976,0.00007398915,0.000035033863,0.0003821474,0.0005227558,0.00006409183,0.0003194304,4.2254885e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010444251,0.00029605706,0.0849663,0.00038910404,0.0011322844,0.00013275005,0.42587706,0.00023876844,0.00023210887,0.3182353,0.07936601,0.08808981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001089615,0.00018626126,0.0013119389,0.00022465184,0.0002743911,0.000012443718,0.10224964,0.00008110767,0.000036817448,0.0022535904,0.89208186,0.00019770899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020650385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017094148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8127158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023652348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016863907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35605198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999376284","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.004","title":"Examining the theory/practice relation in a high school science register: A functional linguistic perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Register (sociolinguistics); Perspective (graphical); Relation (database); Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03387269091278252,"score_gpt":0.2996688263773846,"score_spread":0.2657961354646021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999376284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44630557,0.019524926,0.0014159428,0.0034071968,0.008732379,0.0008525105,0.000043420172,0.000079499856,0.51963854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98819673,0.00008811263,0.0002511726,0.00025564787,0.009113425,0.00001702988,0.0000017001616,0.000013695955,0.0020625035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983544,0.00011694006,0.0005766401,0.00018369756,0.0005302265,0.00023813295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945889,0.0016290271,0.00074989616,0.00013448526,0.0028572103,0.000040443534],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033329485,0.00013067124,0.0002384993,0.00037718556,0.00050009915,0.00020867013,0.00036143814,0.00004994251,0.000107364765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03493402,0.00008523984,0.00011012061,0.0001909118,0.0007728584,0.0011542459,0.000054857803,0.0006973616,0.0000030400533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020697968,0.000059534297,0.0008299075,0.000007902007,0.00010353224,0.000012442002,0.046155218,0.00058500556,0.000047577585,0.9468876,0.0048224134,0.00028184656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017872973,0.00040508655,0.010065305,0.0004170433,0.0008913061,0.00006411199,0.4966718,0.0001322475,0.000091774,0.24756745,0.24151208,0.00039452116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001320613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010588266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6993202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029182478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021603478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97319514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061023584","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.001","title":"The effectiveness of focused instruction of formulaic sequences in augmenting L2 learners' academic writing skills: A quantitative research study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic writing; Task (project management); Computer science; Second language writing; Second-language acquisition; English for academic purposes; Mathematics education; Empirical research; Language proficiency; Phenomenon; Function (biology); Linguistics; Second language; Psychology","score_opus":0.0930799240018794,"score_gpt":0.44914246543863057,"score_spread":0.3560625414367512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061023584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989393,0.0077850046,0.00011028845,0.000035751684,0.0010289479,0.0007284062,0.000005148401,0.000011012267,0.000902441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916273,0.000073766685,0.00022929015,0.000021108763,0.00039486526,0.000049071405,0.0000018175033,0.000021871558,0.000045461424],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949078,0.0026246891,0.0012427686,0.00020594345,0.0006211058,0.00039770236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899551,0.007036274,0.001134901,0.000149255,0.001633297,0.00009115459],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01992993,0.00013910912,0.0004704714,0.0006395425,0.00013618096,0.000022551916,0.0005151026,0.00025632675,0.00003934875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015770707,0.000103103564,0.0001365813,0.00068909104,0.0002325639,0.0005058049,0.000070126494,0.0020466635,0.0000011647272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015840136,0.0011727463,0.2949662,0.00080648303,0.0014266783,0.00011385419,0.5520066,0.0026652333,0.023599897,0.028661897,0.0011657006,0.07757455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010863464,0.0041108634,0.046076708,0.0015457909,0.00010359172,0.0000680807,0.9240684,0.00012401283,0.0060690795,0.005256663,0.0014720866,0.00024125443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007504613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008926934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3720618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001511466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017889681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99251986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069653723","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2010.11.001","title":"Teaching mathematics and science in English in Malaysian classrooms: The impact of teacher beliefs on classroom practices and student learning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Perception; Comprehension; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028780551000523034,"score_gpt":0.3425915200558236,"score_spread":0.3138109690553006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069653723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99151677,0.00038623967,0.000003893788,0.00018427163,0.00043897668,0.00021097923,0.000002557468,0.000015617927,0.0072406647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766254,0.00012477789,0.00032787953,0.000026198808,0.0014667268,0.0000063119305,4.6129057e-7,0.000021925698,0.00036320082],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828273,0.00016927732,0.0006708115,0.00018630538,0.00037990435,0.0003109926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968574,0.0013546296,0.0012858156,0.00011789285,0.00029501645,0.00008926636],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006671743,0.000179494,0.0003654791,0.00045846682,0.00035497724,0.00024197408,0.00041789754,0.00012217107,0.000024844187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01483098,0.000113035225,0.00008926637,0.00007930816,0.00043757056,0.00096987083,0.00008957665,0.0044728313,1.989061e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009644067,0.00033505916,0.19634204,0.00010195768,0.000062047744,0.00000599115,0.7656303,0.00066932314,0.0021473644,0.02555935,0.00023839633,0.008811732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048734574,0.003852236,0.13626243,0.0026975556,0.0002134938,0.000110115216,0.68052936,0.004460603,0.00022910359,0.0052200044,0.1606406,0.00091102003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013913953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016167448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16040221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071191076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011367638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095298215","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2013.10.005","title":"Canada has two official languages—Or does it? Case studies of Canadian scholars' language choices and practices in disseminating knowledge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroscience of multilingualism; French; Context (archaeology); Dissemination; Dialogical self; Sociology; Multilingualism; Identity (music); Public relations; Political science; Linguistics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.0560984974166523,"score_gpt":0.37481716508114804,"score_spread":0.31871866766449575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095298215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9641493,0.025922606,2.746613e-7,0.00093296054,0.0007852646,0.00030422385,0.00014498926,0.00000809618,0.007752304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99458414,0.0008855203,0.00013901817,0.00018342004,0.002473266,0.000026329037,0.0000037758052,0.000022412316,0.0016821438],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829364,0.000104478844,0.0008186478,0.00018039413,0.00024666212,0.00035615568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99578536,0.0014765924,0.0012049471,0.000116949974,0.0012646166,0.00015151215],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090636074,0.00021720243,0.0006095361,0.00070703437,0.00032627984,0.000176194,0.00028916926,0.00006856426,0.00018640135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013250995,0.00013622033,0.00009159237,0.00017317521,0.0003422004,0.0012243884,0.00007676917,0.00055768347,4.2895508e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012729123,0.00017378812,0.006615296,0.0009260958,0.0019589388,0.0022440741,0.8744474,0.00004088851,0.0004361197,0.0053744228,0.08848112,0.01917458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071197806,0.00011888786,0.0001825955,0.0005822605,0.00033331514,0.00013722465,0.856823,0.00002778067,0.00049492234,0.000099802826,0.14023861,0.00024960478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8167873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99791837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18113108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015083171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007205075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2815930944","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.005","title":"A call for critical dialogue: EAP assessment from the Practitioner's perspective in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); English for academic purposes; Medical education; Perspective (graphical); Needs assessment; Psychology; Test (biology); Perception; Best practice; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.029966580781681892,"score_gpt":0.3146158708286282,"score_spread":0.2846492900469463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2815930944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95037997,0.0040054265,0.0018915146,0.012056481,0.011197607,0.0008378496,0.00076440856,0.000037854043,0.018828912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984964,0.000020491676,0.00053664733,0.0015892852,0.012625573,0.000027663946,0.000010382893,0.000016892145,0.00020905158],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989703,0.000107409294,0.0003705106,0.00012256116,0.0002003455,0.00022885005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565613,0.0030375342,0.00024760154,0.00007870361,0.0009156843,0.00006433117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006724087,0.00010472473,0.00021511457,0.000055538567,0.00028908232,0.00009479461,0.00024691387,0.00005889409,0.00023433915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007715077,0.00007005902,0.00010010477,0.000022334867,0.00012998653,0.00033701686,0.000020101104,0.0008422695,5.5274364e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005123408,0.00015656844,0.0047796913,0.000048884896,0.00040824624,0.000039528673,0.35417563,0.0000732891,0.0001333032,0.3517753,0.2810148,0.0068824375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011645851,0.00039672264,0.0016813382,0.00018116868,0.0001236769,0.000011595959,0.1969304,0.0002847912,0.00006982884,0.010943029,0.78802097,0.00019192092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3091279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63055366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50700617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004283171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007241849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92362255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949053728","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2019.06.001","title":"Predicting integrated writing task performance: Source comprehension, prewriting planning, and individual differences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Prewriting; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Mathematics education; English for academic purposes; Reading (process); Active listening; Task (project management); Argumentative; Computer science; Linguistics; Teaching method; Cooperative learning; Communication; Engineering","score_opus":0.03761718700008691,"score_gpt":0.31423456641080055,"score_spread":0.2766173794107136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949053728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945512,0.0018057328,0.00007514862,0.0001837884,0.0010450128,0.0003014131,0.000012231812,0.00007936638,0.0019461447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951223,0.00032227414,0.00073538534,0.000099403784,0.0033740082,0.0000087628405,0.000008022048,0.000020617534,0.0003092136],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979352,0.00017382434,0.0007262151,0.00020546692,0.00053063926,0.00042869052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996608,0.0013383179,0.00079660816,0.00007004736,0.0010155666,0.00017143947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028094002,0.0001591454,0.00035055686,0.00022023161,0.0006517184,0.00021169799,0.00036054,0.00025841003,0.000015225641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048245015,0.00014401207,0.00008382204,0.00021188203,0.00016834016,0.0007589618,0.000056889774,0.00093303114,9.458074e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051764877,0.00002853706,0.92567635,0.00014630608,0.00005018348,7.6769993e-7,0.05755938,0.00007129979,0.00042157026,0.00029479034,0.0013344871,0.014364593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034319381,0.0011303166,0.23631188,0.008979518,0.00033956312,0.00010203547,0.6233324,0.002554413,0.0009880535,0.00077602477,0.121130645,0.0009232487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004114695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000044125645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68936443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066108456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002565746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5872642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980020974","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100801","title":"Bringing a social semiotic perspective to secondary teacher education in the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Massachusetts Amherst; International Research Foundation for English Language Education","keywords":"Coursework; Ell; Context (archaeology); Pedagogy; Semiotics; Teacher education; Mathematics education; Metalanguage; Discipline; Content and language integrated learning; Teaching method; Sociology; Psychology; Vocabulary development; Computer science; Linguistics; Social science","score_opus":0.01814968741884635,"score_gpt":0.31426433911240087,"score_spread":0.2961146516935545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980020974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94928795,0.0015649121,0.000011694772,0.001989047,0.00096025877,0.00032444362,0.00001686903,0.000011958054,0.045832884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057937,0.00006991007,0.000045176774,0.0014215575,0.004256913,0.000014407683,0.000008620637,0.000017147126,0.0035869072],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901104,0.00008347691,0.00036556536,0.00011195129,0.00022814608,0.0001998276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985644,0.00024532306,0.00026681295,0.00007536519,0.0008175869,0.000030487543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007920077,0.000117655756,0.00025524848,0.0004210383,0.00014566135,0.000106767104,0.00033565098,0.000046966332,0.00027753782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084684533,0.00007979217,0.00015087087,0.0001253298,0.00007680214,0.00036782102,0.000034666577,0.0005897539,0.0000055435344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007002208,0.00013581302,0.0011456761,0.000044623725,0.0002088396,0.0000025291108,0.8478885,0.00019696812,0.0000284898,0.04945133,0.09804473,0.0027824703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003088395,0.000101446574,0.000762919,0.00011431808,0.000116607116,0.000003864631,0.70129234,0.000033003555,0.000018253431,0.003597864,0.29353315,0.00011739455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013816352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013051755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19548842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001436166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015160498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.325383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980115974","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100804","title":"Investigating the effects of reducing linguistic complexity on EAL student comprehension in first-year undergraduate assessments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Comprehension; Lexis; Psychology; Discipline; Linguistics; Mathematics education; English for academic purposes; Computer science; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04058023611351222,"score_gpt":0.31851801784658934,"score_spread":0.27793778173307715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980115974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941957,0.00044835405,0.00000899953,0.000120141565,0.0021033506,0.0003254508,0.00000439588,0.000014989907,0.002778626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979999,0.000032211068,0.00021316111,0.0001672015,0.0013245213,0.0000044390636,0.000003436602,0.000019560955,0.00023554068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860203,0.00017420501,0.0005673372,0.00012972335,0.00032430387,0.00020236982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969198,0.0019662965,0.0006799822,0.00011805755,0.00026548127,0.000050344348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008521116,0.00013552359,0.00034354182,0.00015351511,0.00017515519,0.0000634228,0.0003034207,0.00006440015,0.000032365824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022825038,0.00009178338,0.00012296632,0.000042887037,0.0001111613,0.0001406535,0.00005031025,0.0011021588,0.0000018251479],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004324027,0.00069054076,0.114454426,0.0029751258,0.0007024608,0.00003940196,0.646701,0.013973792,0.0024989478,0.20440917,0.0047492813,0.008373477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03806873,0.020015841,0.12714794,0.0545523,0.0015260115,0.00009674501,0.4075173,0.018084371,0.0084947115,0.07086113,0.25032902,0.0033058783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000121940386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004054421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24557975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007018174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004228971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47883925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297015106","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101178","title":"Supporting international graduate students’ academic language and literacies development through online and hybrid communities of practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"English for academic purposes; Constructive; Academic writing; Mathematics education; Socialization; Computer science; Sociocultural evolution; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.09259532353079189,"score_gpt":0.47904854305872213,"score_spread":0.3864532195279302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297015106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99361897,0.0029241347,0.0010013669,0.0005397913,0.0012771932,0.00014773416,0.00006608654,0.00001851507,0.00040621345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97977966,0.00030253243,0.018092778,0.0006387077,0.0005300346,0.000016220269,0.000037980528,0.000022410772,0.00057964766],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997457,0.0008616094,0.0009015311,0.00011846632,0.00045062116,0.00021073829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603695,0.0018040298,0.001458456,0.00008573466,0.0005752331,0.000039583472],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063277553,0.00013520905,0.00031561317,0.00022994506,0.00024126338,0.00002624961,0.00040593484,0.00006719659,0.000048962254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00432865,0.00012462259,0.0000504847,0.00010921556,0.00011808368,0.00043027915,0.0003043153,0.0025504034,1.3386553e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083837024,0.0002904087,0.07049241,0.00008965069,0.00077006564,0.000050733866,0.8750213,0.000052006108,0.001300231,0.0018684826,0.004833354,0.044393033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002330957,0.0006391317,0.03740439,0.00023001632,0.00014476752,0.0011628205,0.4298363,0.000023940056,0.0009454465,0.0009274665,0.5260787,0.00027608158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023857847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.2195736e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52124536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006243464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058566435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381850403","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101270","title":"Microaggressions to microaffirmations: A trioethnography of plurilingual EAP instructors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); English for academic purposes; Sociology; Typology; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Citizen journalism; Psychology; Computer science; Anthropology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.10055908413429784,"score_gpt":0.49897721971085474,"score_spread":0.3984181355765569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381850403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924389,0.00060234085,0.00002476467,0.0016356958,0.0030616187,0.00038493585,0.000073712145,0.00005090692,0.0017271135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904282,0.0017104336,0.0023476116,0.00048091062,0.0040830723,0.000021973103,0.000009172645,0.000024069728,0.0008945497],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998302,0.00012831704,0.00077716116,0.00011038799,0.00036687937,0.000315256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99687505,0.00074903714,0.0006402373,0.000102923965,0.0013389275,0.00029380352],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015197122,0.00010810026,0.00029330063,0.0009590395,0.00027350907,0.000029185665,0.0005080879,0.00020697647,0.000040751824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016634086,0.000097814525,0.00025807618,0.0013592893,0.00018605351,0.00027143743,0.00003727783,0.00037482902,0.00000644158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023263224,0.00014928788,0.0066158967,0.0001248837,0.00015301954,0.0000027712545,0.7722296,0.00021141856,0.008999625,0.008510736,0.14919491,0.0535752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060347357,0.00010071513,0.0012407892,0.000258687,0.000043068067,0.000002672404,0.050540805,0.000006242667,0.0059687807,0.0014113617,0.93968105,0.00014233857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010911646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042222946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79048616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005682266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075920025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405009599","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101465","title":"A multi-dimensional analysis of thesis abstracts: Variation across academic levels and L1 backgrounds","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); English for academic purposes; Mathematics education; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Physics; Philosophy; Astronomy","score_opus":0.06022229784542487,"score_gpt":0.349916375220569,"score_spread":0.28969407737514413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405009599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9726771,0.023149202,0.00038459973,0.00029767666,0.0014798319,0.00019254733,0.000709102,0.00004248715,0.0010674155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533594,0.0007063016,0.00069361477,0.00011766039,0.0020929547,0.0000111222525,0.0000137498,0.000026716009,0.0010019732],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977389,0.000059204747,0.0012033392,0.00024181714,0.00046791616,0.00028884705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970255,0.0010189239,0.0007398854,0.000124963,0.0010043695,0.00008637382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016856296,0.00022326093,0.0007250644,0.0006445093,0.00019582862,0.00015439285,0.00029783754,0.00018890732,0.00021703925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015938134,0.00016535609,0.00054424955,0.00027717836,0.0003348148,0.0010415507,0.00008125501,0.0007073717,0.0000017339139],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005771329,0.00046711368,0.003485988,0.0011823227,0.056689136,0.00008802511,0.7917602,0.0076855756,0.0086244065,0.08409428,0.01870179,0.026644029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060735773,0.0014194096,0.10066306,0.0041831397,0.07041615,0.00010479215,0.29603395,0.027068969,0.0044131787,0.019805249,0.46686804,0.0029504737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033034084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069892565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49572626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066689354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007802391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6743026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412972797","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101555","title":"Pre-admission EAP course completion as evidence of English language proficiency for university admission: A longitudinal evaluation study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Course (navigation); Medical education; Longitudinal study; English for academic purposes; English language; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics education; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.07609000682333174,"score_gpt":0.3797398177341562,"score_spread":0.3036498109108245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412972797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908537,0.0028858252,0.0005592096,0.0001789271,0.0020022313,0.0012939821,0.000020030828,0.000044157387,0.0021619224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955348,0.00006160346,0.00017381225,0.000030221076,0.0016241152,0.000012098039,0.0000075480834,0.00001252677,0.0025433025],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817955,0.00030370886,0.0005748408,0.00021269821,0.0005216206,0.00020755146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947925,0.00080231775,0.00077029935,0.00014167091,0.0033954808,0.00009771528],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035161658,0.00015600878,0.00036510726,0.0002660495,0.00044487484,0.000059688173,0.00038437868,0.00011121509,0.00013481332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015265571,0.00013147022,0.00020057496,0.00010258363,0.00009029238,0.00069450284,0.000054295277,0.000619851,4.2237312e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005992667,0.0019672373,0.04287594,0.00146939,0.0005805837,0.000014846478,0.8535667,0.0015027323,0.0015545695,0.020197526,0.03939626,0.030881556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009372624,0.008636917,0.014486252,0.007905096,0.0028800888,0.00000807336,0.5093814,0.0034454262,0.0014817792,0.0016847579,0.44002688,0.00069068634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037273418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018760924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40063062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013980076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046926574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99302924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414826426","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101585","title":"Book review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.020072553537651635,"score_gpt":0.3158063101227242,"score_spread":0.29573375658507256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414826426","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014100705,0.88116723,0.00006188609,0.003408496,0.0022966634,0.00021559725,0.000020498412,0.000022279743,0.11266636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010653436,0.6132301,0.00029533738,0.11199567,0.017466977,0.000096732954,0.0000133251415,0.000055383436,0.24619304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988155,0.000034479515,0.0006643036,0.00010002618,0.00020439882,0.00018130842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979432,0.00024013012,0.00042654655,0.0001222063,0.0012279518,0.00003997163],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059141224,0.00012790893,0.00047183895,0.00018995388,0.00015096858,0.000047157228,0.000380956,0.000048321952,0.0012185518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028103562,0.00009157477,0.0003643495,0.00006237074,0.00017095587,0.00047636428,0.000048989208,0.00036400228,0.000004301837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001425173,0.000020180012,0.000013439095,0.00038002478,0.00032254527,0.0000030803715,0.0032128438,0.0000016934773,0.0000037347256,0.030214436,0.96297973,0.002834037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025504438,0.000054622295,0.000003784244,0.0022670436,0.0006443442,0.0000020377777,0.0026859893,0.0000014175994,0.0000773778,0.0014222631,0.99249583,0.00009021286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001832743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000049195783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2679371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036756282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007462455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416221152","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101723","title":"Post-admission Standalone Undergraduate Credit-Bearing ESL Courses: What Difference Do They Make?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Innovations in Educational Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Software; Work (physics); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.03446535809004834,"score_gpt":0.40292462658580874,"score_spread":0.3684592684957604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416221152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82006437,0.01175514,0.014287163,0.054040086,0.074368425,0.0017668798,0.0000961562,0.00017520697,0.023446603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95733595,0.0064673657,0.018879984,0.0013061828,0.007735636,0.000044874167,0.000009179618,0.000033638356,0.008187174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975306,0.00031987487,0.0007966811,0.00021339231,0.00074114726,0.00039833132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929788,0.0019135388,0.000698085,0.00017604097,0.0040788315,0.00015467357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003953536,0.00017221685,0.00034386507,0.00047336056,0.0006459848,0.00032157966,0.0008194151,0.00031205497,0.000024114785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026548479,0.00014993078,0.00015965359,0.0005811932,0.00022294582,0.0011271733,0.00007800919,0.000923578,0.0000010300238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053380977,0.0003639607,0.0096373325,0.00018283073,0.0003467395,0.0000074453233,0.053504128,0.00019876145,0.006862125,0.7104656,0.04135438,0.1765429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010515305,0.00019932626,0.003289709,0.0016292041,0.00016128084,0.000008419702,0.068168074,0.000017159007,0.0025176776,0.3566528,0.5659704,0.00033436998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037785874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030936135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52461606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046864548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018227876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9816513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}