{"meta":{"query_hash":"ff301678b1f6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes"},"cohort_total":15,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":15,"exported":15,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ff301678b1f6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+English+for+Academic+Purposes"},"results":[{"id":"W1986046641","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2014.08.003","title":"‘You’ and ‘I’ in university seminars and spoken learner discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Variety (cybernetics); Interpersonal communication; Task (project management); Linguistics; Computer science; Construct (python library); Pronoun; Repetition (rhetorical device); Point (geometry); Spoken language; Space (punctuation); Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Communication","score_opus":0.014537156399292258,"score_gpt":0.2583829412180835,"score_spread":0.2438457848187912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986046641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239418,0.0013338483,0.0020466298,0.0036698412,0.00015859511,0.00004335051,0.0001039525,0.000078644116,0.068623334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99787235,0.00010332267,0.00019900377,0.00009347003,0.00003325027,0.000023872632,0.00002741896,0.000035036024,0.001612159],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98945576,0.007968626,0.000368309,0.0006949759,0.00083206367,0.0006801748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94945914,0.043227468,0.0024677182,0.0009245845,0.0019328615,0.0019881842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01079191,0.000422059,0.0007465136,0.003235411,0.006053564,0.014099561,0.0017561871,0.003802162,0.013290773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044470664,0.0007027464,0.0003843113,0.0028981888,0.011401407,0.0151177365,0.008882502,0.004838907,0.0011639046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019785925,0.00016698292,0.006788543,0.0001461496,0.000016059976,0.0004112187,0.9511245,0.000087327775,0.00088481384,0.0336919,0.00082334655,0.0056613986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057094847,0.00011889242,0.016157487,0.000279768,0.000030293972,0.0002836257,0.9569253,0.0007512066,0.0010475019,0.013214246,0.011084663,0.000049894374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00541141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004404159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014099561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044427156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031232906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057073772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999376284","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2006.08.004","title":"Examining the theory/practice relation in a high school science register: A functional linguistic perspective","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Register (sociolinguistics); Perspective (graphical); Relation (database); Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03387269091278252,"score_gpt":0.2996688263773846,"score_spread":0.2657961354646021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999376284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8555022,0.00033978088,0.014796264,0.0038283742,0.000034368903,0.000091635644,0.000085479,0.000046890164,0.12527494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996765,0.000055719625,0.001705249,0.000055622415,0.000008128544,0.000030927964,0.00002300191,0.00001553199,0.0013407712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.992098,0.0048586125,0.00044685867,0.00072361046,0.0010997531,0.0007732196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9506199,0.040046927,0.0028833826,0.0018241927,0.0032499814,0.0013756197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009303972,0.0003418061,0.0005913949,0.012233724,0.009614717,0.013463303,0.0020112607,0.0022585026,0.009706203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033408727,0.00062917336,0.0004411688,0.008848158,0.01866039,0.012361817,0.0077587184,0.0025978547,0.00052621297],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114875766,0.00033131457,0.05111212,0.0002263021,0.00002084714,0.0006203703,0.38613683,0.00027434822,0.0029794222,0.5213867,0.0006489566,0.036147933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032225733,0.00022662319,0.051328138,0.00033855558,0.000065078595,0.0005355266,0.81642973,0.0037986122,0.0024772128,0.10669045,0.018032292,0.00004549804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016418288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019347645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068185795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070546637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04947245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061023584","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2015.02.001","title":"The effectiveness of focused instruction of formulaic sequences in augmenting L2 learners' academic writing skills: A quantitative research study","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic writing; Task (project management); Computer science; Second language writing; Second-language acquisition; English for academic purposes; Mathematics education; Empirical research; Language proficiency; Phenomenon; Function (biology); Linguistics; Second language; Psychology","score_opus":0.0930799240018794,"score_gpt":0.44914246543863057,"score_spread":0.3560625414367512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061023584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986312,0.000043936307,0.0004383289,0.0000101663245,0.0000032967853,0.0002045276,0.000031022115,0.00001288101,0.000624487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886391,0.00023004899,0.007995289,0.00005204715,0.000020144733,0.0012301035,0.00009165949,0.000017394188,0.0017240598],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812824,0.00074886455,0.00019738618,0.0003838551,0.00044098773,0.00010065226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98419446,0.012394167,0.0010453918,0.0006500795,0.0011782977,0.00053763116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025427905,0.00077229715,0.0007692362,0.00093258626,0.00074767804,0.0008009113,0.001065228,0.0008109029,0.003375058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013942895,0.00044688053,0.00042856476,0.00047056732,0.0006463748,0.0009980658,0.00075575226,0.0007762213,0.00042276573],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023138763,0.16653128,0.03940915,0.004454982,0.00065349333,0.00060279295,0.04385331,0.002678085,0.21653673,0.0010911445,0.00086839445,0.5001819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011164436,0.40129316,0.32524464,0.0009074332,0.0027145366,0.0012208974,0.020571869,0.0072761523,0.21911855,0.0020601368,0.008094335,0.00033382286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012033787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014659147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003375058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005922331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001303862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013447762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069653723","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2010.11.001","title":"Teaching mathematics and science in English in Malaysian classrooms: The impact of teacher beliefs on classroom practices and student learning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Perception; Comprehension; Psychology; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.028780551000523034,"score_gpt":0.3425915200558236,"score_spread":0.3138109690553006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069653723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994808,0.00005023672,0.000010541452,0.000058444362,0.0000017169776,0.0000020521938,0.0000045551537,5.2026326e-7,0.00039120164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943334,0.00008419619,0.00004623049,0.00001729091,0.0000012270899,0.0000038922008,0.000007995712,0.0000011491387,0.00040469208],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742377,0.0009457481,0.00018495519,0.0002376213,0.0006971143,0.00051070785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98715544,0.0041693803,0.0038483662,0.00036836782,0.0013720352,0.0030865052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026431647,0.00030165853,0.0003291188,0.0007987444,0.0016301328,0.0032070407,0.0008334844,0.00061914494,0.0017941565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010441932,0.00050829654,0.0004155831,0.00055651116,0.0015628872,0.0010837751,0.0021446436,0.0019230408,0.00037245656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002571123,0.0015475734,0.9100436,0.00007156383,0.00005722738,0.00034655764,0.07108966,0.00013761218,0.0019489417,0.00037258264,0.00017813587,0.013949462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015406362,0.00042956046,0.9177177,0.00009368662,0.000048399073,0.00015908615,0.07959351,0.00023912698,0.00087009434,0.00012805358,0.0006811269,0.000024120862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03339658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07027842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03339658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003186975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00452082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06640434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095298215","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2013.10.005","title":"Canada has two official languages—Or does it? Case studies of Canadian scholars' language choices and practices in disseminating knowledge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Neuroscience of multilingualism; French; Context (archaeology); Dissemination; Dialogical self; Sociology; Multilingualism; Identity (music); Public relations; Political science; Linguistics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social psychology; History","score_opus":0.0560984974166523,"score_gpt":0.37481716508114804,"score_spread":0.31871866766449575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095298215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77186406,0.0027077356,0.0013964353,0.027727688,0.00014362631,0.00027368867,0.0002545984,0.000046906545,0.19558525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9837894,0.0009283455,0.0012313108,0.001464172,0.000009494862,0.000044284447,0.00004719196,0.000026350963,0.012459417],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795689,0.006862848,0.0008102541,0.0011274138,0.0051695607,0.0064609777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96403825,0.018500125,0.0019317792,0.0013962204,0.009261661,0.004871963],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015238843,0.00047317793,0.0007735865,0.005072795,0.074468896,0.01822167,0.003326893,0.004996035,0.004891664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034492943,0.0005739852,0.000554426,0.015785946,0.021842662,0.005708732,0.008923909,0.004712687,0.00031159728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099192395,0.00008434518,0.015507234,0.00022400662,0.000018874847,0.0028956176,0.8413295,0.00028524658,0.0006847436,0.10975191,0.006065046,0.023054201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015668851,0.000026995149,0.0058340705,0.0003520833,0.000038613747,0.0002471816,0.91389126,0.00019094958,0.00037369825,0.0029908463,0.07598365,0.00005505099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99127054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1690145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31372416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9638254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2815930944","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2018.07.005","title":"A call for critical dialogue: EAP assessment from the Practitioner's perspective in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); English for academic purposes; Medical education; Perspective (graphical); Needs assessment; Psychology; Test (biology); Perception; Best practice; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.029966580781681892,"score_gpt":0.3146158708286282,"score_spread":0.2846492900469463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2815930944","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11688296,0.0093985535,0.0039853444,0.7608355,0.003936816,0.0004372257,0.00014020728,0.00013200592,0.10425138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8937752,0.0049274736,0.007337588,0.05499608,0.00037160274,0.0002283384,0.00007004397,0.00020231878,0.03809128],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683225,0.011774198,0.0014374459,0.0017576953,0.007824462,0.008883563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8848146,0.026046589,0.0023776244,0.0010439745,0.042066008,0.043651175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02946817,0.00045058047,0.0007715961,0.0027500666,0.05554686,0.021198906,0.005905389,0.012102369,0.009224637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079884544,0.00070564455,0.00060796645,0.0037303874,0.016722547,0.0073900535,0.01537574,0.018510846,0.0005838472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020467324,0.00034024956,0.014521718,0.0010299354,0.00005728877,0.009603314,0.4195096,0.0010274084,0.0012607798,0.1343614,0.23660758,0.18147604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004821673,0.00008300523,0.010690788,0.0017230255,0.000028907742,0.0009883585,0.5775567,0.00069521705,0.00045668517,0.018290985,0.38923028,0.00020779678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9672976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9892846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84232664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15767334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5818538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97697955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949053728","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2019.06.001","title":"Predicting integrated writing task performance: Source comprehension, prewriting planning, and individual differences","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Prewriting; Reading comprehension; Psychology; Mathematics education; English for academic purposes; Reading (process); Active listening; Task (project management); Argumentative; Computer science; Linguistics; Teaching method; Cooperative learning; Communication; Engineering","score_opus":0.03761718700008691,"score_gpt":0.31423456641080055,"score_spread":0.2766173794107136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949053728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992642,0.000028374268,0.00011317562,0.000023842587,0.000005473737,0.0000074357736,0.00006989685,0.0000041950466,0.000483345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990538,0.00002462575,0.0001822549,0.000015241034,0.0000073699844,0.000012162181,0.00014323342,0.000007959602,0.0005532884],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926215,0.00021773041,0.000084222884,0.00021671367,0.0001253653,0.00009388325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899968,0.0061859186,0.0015235669,0.0006216778,0.00058508647,0.0010869533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019162374,0.0006470701,0.00036703626,0.00071478204,0.0004442298,0.0014631769,0.00047555027,0.0013216132,0.0035168235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011029896,0.00043382807,0.0003777699,0.00063633645,0.00042014604,0.0011547216,0.000619701,0.0011372615,0.0010125923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006040934,0.0006221022,0.9906901,0.000011874177,0.00014118677,0.00008352284,0.0006543063,0.00043490555,0.0013264327,0.000044722423,0.00015453466,0.0052322545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016620972,0.00029207725,0.9966568,0.000005651912,0.000052421532,0.00008403486,0.00029295293,0.0020592215,0.000305991,0.00012254047,0.00010375318,0.000007873469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031972774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046998844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035168235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019916243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003846931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011764944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980020974","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100801","title":"Bringing a social semiotic perspective to secondary teacher education in the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Massachusetts Amherst; International Research Foundation for English Language Education","keywords":"Coursework; Ell; Context (archaeology); Pedagogy; Semiotics; Teacher education; Mathematics education; Metalanguage; Discipline; Content and language integrated learning; Teaching method; Sociology; Psychology; Vocabulary development; Computer science; Linguistics; Social science","score_opus":0.01814968741884635,"score_gpt":0.31426433911240087,"score_spread":0.2961146516935545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980020974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7730144,0.0023209325,0.0016360118,0.05892543,0.00027700636,0.000025462417,0.00010645077,0.000030446286,0.16366383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368745,0.00052013155,0.00018438911,0.0008793248,0.000030095727,0.000012098998,0.000019474897,0.000009790743,0.0046572476],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860615,0.00083538407,0.000037180547,0.00007708361,0.000098659155,0.00034561966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967933,0.0019169234,0.00025985113,0.00007305816,0.00034650505,0.00061028905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015801603,0.00011643114,0.00017553991,0.0013821331,0.012908085,0.006854468,0.0004879487,0.00102142,0.0036958999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003236517,0.00015428715,0.0001257462,0.0017200272,0.0064109582,0.0031475618,0.0045928997,0.0034312326,0.00013995706],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074628726,0.0002466377,0.027316453,0.00010432899,0.000008187029,0.0010360959,0.6514078,0.00026154768,0.00093069044,0.26462126,0.011483964,0.0425083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007651463,0.000040871153,0.03471826,0.0002554535,0.000009820168,0.00012415556,0.833131,0.00033480368,0.00048613406,0.015628088,0.11525068,0.000013067154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22512794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42203775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22512794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009689117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013448314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4476351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2980115974","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100804","title":"Investigating the effects of reducing linguistic complexity on EAL student comprehension in first-year undergraduate assessments","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Second Language Learning and Teaching","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Comprehension; Lexis; Psychology; Discipline; Linguistics; Mathematics education; English for academic purposes; Computer science; Pedagogy; Sociology","score_opus":0.04058023611351222,"score_gpt":0.31851801784658934,"score_spread":0.27793778173307715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2980115974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994673,0.0000122602805,0.00006443205,0.000036472327,0.000008020385,0.000027501577,0.0000179485,0.00001254467,0.00035357324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978537,0.000028818375,0.0009229587,0.000047015306,0.000017056045,0.00011984753,0.000061821025,0.000011493928,0.0009372232],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753666,0.00087634777,0.00029448353,0.00051096495,0.0005479616,0.00023368504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94908774,0.037509393,0.0046984474,0.0017514013,0.0027688462,0.0041841073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026807575,0.0006306505,0.0008368185,0.00036011956,0.00063803076,0.0016668155,0.0010015421,0.0009677062,0.0052947174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049671948,0.0003467103,0.0004972111,0.0003065264,0.0005960398,0.0014125172,0.001085993,0.0014893827,0.0006992748],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.095022745,0.16108465,0.20951828,0.0014483327,0.0012935603,0.00057106215,0.035830915,0.0040880414,0.14325905,0.00071068946,0.0033884915,0.34378424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053101163,0.13062966,0.8127063,0.00020145059,0.001190595,0.00020114267,0.0070542837,0.006298199,0.031701583,0.0009476828,0.003559178,0.000199913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00312744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006210435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052947174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006243569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017712593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297015106","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101178","title":"Supporting international graduate students’ academic language and literacies development through online and hybrid communities of practice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"English for academic purposes; Constructive; Academic writing; Mathematics education; Socialization; Computer science; Sociocultural evolution; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.09259532353079189,"score_gpt":0.47904854305872213,"score_spread":0.3864532195279302,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297015106","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94190407,0.00014069301,0.019292926,0.0021674433,0.00012640348,0.00041307384,0.000046889734,0.00039996777,0.035508446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695649,0.000062321975,0.02430302,0.00019777176,0.000031188087,0.00025274802,0.000035934878,0.00004235343,0.005509639],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956625,0.002685781,0.00012522547,0.00040521778,0.00066049857,0.0004608038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790071,0.009666313,0.0012064342,0.001982183,0.002207008,0.0059309374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007206277,0.00033363386,0.00019014353,0.0012456819,0.0020635435,0.0043453104,0.0015348194,0.0010268809,0.007939616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019310912,0.000251046,0.0003090544,0.0006172062,0.0012598293,0.003981383,0.0098842075,0.0010106999,0.0011580129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000622231,0.010838342,0.06251449,0.000305857,0.00007312779,0.0005626596,0.07410311,0.0010317704,0.010313548,0.011083704,0.006994247,0.8215569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023424537,0.014737465,0.17761427,0.0024909845,0.0004444922,0.0028058232,0.37777358,0.040729623,0.024779135,0.08536856,0.27042514,0.0004884835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011665868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003115571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007939616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008122075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047461977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03811091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381850403","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2023.101270","title":"Microaggressions to microaffirmations: A trioethnography of plurilingual EAP instructors","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Christian Studies; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); English for academic purposes; Sociology; Typology; Qualitative research; Pedagogy; Citizen journalism; Psychology; Computer science; Anthropology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.10055908413429784,"score_gpt":0.49897721971085474,"score_spread":0.3984181355765569,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381850403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95598733,0.00027331107,0.00045179453,0.007943857,0.0001444646,0.000029146091,0.000034448338,0.000014330791,0.035121173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853697,0.00017529193,0.000110745816,0.0010878141,0.000043497792,0.000022335997,0.000015142117,0.000019275814,0.013156221],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504787,0.0019931714,0.00013439133,0.00031035588,0.00057860534,0.0019356146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98645717,0.004940526,0.0018618865,0.0004910203,0.0017129992,0.0045363563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044181896,0.00020203753,0.00024941436,0.0022360575,0.019335274,0.009387613,0.0014763873,0.0021160084,0.009500577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016712498,0.00032898205,0.00018337881,0.0023692313,0.0061752074,0.0057352963,0.009529234,0.005528664,0.0007258408],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004699697,0.00012656792,0.051803768,0.000022311204,0.0000048499105,0.00071447075,0.9131775,0.000017834993,0.00026504803,0.012551232,0.0032526497,0.01801685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019641163,0.000024188656,0.018064722,0.000045677636,0.0000025057066,0.0001438422,0.96116114,0.000050321214,0.0000924842,0.00071688613,0.019686963,0.000009324286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028937433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.066332825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028937433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004069154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063282414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057537973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405009599","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101465","title":"A multi-dimensional analysis of thesis abstracts: Variation across academic levels and L1 backgrounds","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centennial College","funders":"","keywords":"Variation (astronomy); English for academic purposes; Mathematics education; Computer science; Sociology; Linguistics; Psychology; Physics; Philosophy; Astronomy","score_opus":0.06022229784542487,"score_gpt":0.349916375220569,"score_spread":0.28969407737514413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405009599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817885,0.0008230076,0.002779119,0.0006870665,0.00012007575,0.00021903578,0.0024365294,0.000103624654,0.011043019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892489,0.0004736765,0.0040308144,0.00010320517,0.0001577628,0.00040844159,0.0026078983,0.00007634027,0.0028929112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98702407,0.004433603,0.002617384,0.0008901787,0.0045588734,0.00047593427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8525522,0.075246155,0.031855386,0.0032785425,0.03221219,0.0048555625],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01008553,0.00040274198,0.0005236436,0.015225075,0.002124764,0.0064962693,0.0007564833,0.0007749876,0.005239393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106167525,0.0002256858,0.00069759984,0.010246256,0.00095200987,0.0019201026,0.0049691084,0.0007639658,0.0016809962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012491489,0.0005012629,0.6285643,0.002019323,0.0005427884,0.0006486713,0.13618313,0.0004004714,0.019408956,0.0029238116,0.012512323,0.19504581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026400632,0.00023869041,0.9196678,0.00041339776,0.00010816178,0.00055830716,0.057605233,0.00092194066,0.001995427,0.0011114271,0.017242663,0.00011064803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015717781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026101575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9899145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016782569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018480127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05333799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412972797","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101555","title":"Pre-admission EAP course completion as evidence of English language proficiency for university admission: A longitudinal evaluation study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Course (navigation); Medical education; Longitudinal study; English for academic purposes; English language; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Mathematics education; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.07609000682333174,"score_gpt":0.3797398177341562,"score_spread":0.3036498109108245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412972797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99944085,0.000021161295,0.000037530925,0.000031661497,0.0000039768706,0.000059308204,0.00005532183,0.000002803928,0.00034742174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99877816,0.000042088857,0.00013905858,0.000026635182,0.0000048935967,0.0001104953,0.00024764636,0.000002233199,0.0006487725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981834,0.00051692076,0.00015231149,0.0001816637,0.00059331034,0.00037230278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876439,0.0010130919,0.0025185046,0.00046684963,0.0042573456,0.0041002934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062292423,0.0003274179,0.000417507,0.0013206821,0.0019559201,0.0017753621,0.00075850013,0.0005334533,0.0012212628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011845695,0.0002553054,0.00059281784,0.00078782055,0.00063485175,0.0010568519,0.0013482294,0.0016031639,0.0006566391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031553156,0.0028620472,0.98125124,0.000012572044,0.000027787319,0.00015387314,0.0029459368,0.000053746327,0.00042553194,0.000042998294,0.00026754718,0.011641298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023895875,0.0035833388,0.9910595,0.000019279812,0.000024644254,0.00008522575,0.0041046445,0.00021981132,0.0003802417,0.00003275149,0.00044380352,0.000022999686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034819596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0681203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034819596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024642397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004108922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069233835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414826426","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101585","title":"Book review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.020072553537651635,"score_gpt":0.3158063101227242,"score_spread":0.29573375658507256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414826426","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042810166,0.2869657,0.001669913,0.06366697,0.10274414,0.0002629103,0.002575596,0.00071997865,0.54096675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019388506,0.10972501,0.0008025418,0.018093184,0.019252753,0.0001452907,0.0016992816,0.00026325765,0.84807974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988856,0.00013123128,0.000043755583,0.00009439992,0.000748999,0.00009616223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954496,0.0007629406,0.00022807109,0.00026072978,0.0026596135,0.0006390927],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011375726,0.000538289,0.0008445575,0.0038064066,0.00088933995,0.0037618184,0.0015411422,0.0020444035,0.36766863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008009963,0.00030711,0.00042437942,0.0038083761,0.0006693377,0.0019412301,0.00154252,0.002292426,0.2694232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004734743,0.000005991296,0.000017419634,0.00018718033,0.0000019105626,0.000019768251,0.000008310414,0.000016295911,0.000033637993,0.00089511304,0.945194,0.053615566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021391181,0.0000026132948,0.000039583785,0.00018993388,0.0000018622824,0.000039732004,0.0000097364955,0.0000051817365,0.000014143691,0.00028303845,0.9994106,0.000001453321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036018654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008440773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36766863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001861706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004487846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9019439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416221152","doi":"10.1016/j.jeap.2026.101723","title":"Post-admission Standalone Undergraduate Credit-Bearing ESL Courses: What Difference Do They Make?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of English for Academic Purposes","topic":"Innovations in Educational Methods","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Focus (optics); Software; Work (physics); Key (lock)","score_opus":0.03446535809004834,"score_gpt":0.40292462658580874,"score_spread":0.3684592684957604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416221152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907747,0.0008391251,0.000077051,0.0048420224,0.00013191863,0.000026815573,0.00012732379,0.000009051106,0.003172025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99782336,0.00042144192,0.00010510236,0.00038531417,0.000045705503,0.000013106079,0.00010660721,0.000005271512,0.001094058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971718,0.00049056864,0.00012026419,0.0002271006,0.00081564207,0.0011744966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839012,0.0018978143,0.0031408328,0.00030742935,0.0017630889,0.00898963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004129999,0.00030925838,0.0005764005,0.000984768,0.0018131385,0.0042058052,0.0017461253,0.0013383375,0.0053608366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025158742,0.00021644786,0.00058156654,0.001233872,0.0011253046,0.0026013958,0.002111377,0.0021925045,0.0009551106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005147151,0.001573923,0.83916837,0.00008430667,0.00006947839,0.00032491074,0.005441213,0.00009287151,0.00040238682,0.00050078,0.0037881962,0.14803892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028847075,0.00035794973,0.9749707,0.00017399702,0.000036896075,0.00008188774,0.020208286,0.00020743607,0.00025797228,0.0003225109,0.0033230912,0.000030419606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08816194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22039677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08816194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005029516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008715549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17529756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}