{"meta":{"query_hash":"7dfcaf970ae5","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7dfcaf970ae5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Environmental+Impact+Assessment"},"results":[{"id":"W2990673677","doi":"","title":"환경영향평가제도를 둘러싼 한미FTA 투자분쟁의 가능성: Bilcon 대 캐나다 투자자-국가 간 소송 사례를 통한 교훈","year":2012,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Relation (database); Political science; Settlement (finance); Investor-state dispute settlement; Business; International trade; Law; Finance; Foreign direct investment; Computer science","score_opus":0.014516048307624365,"score_gpt":0.3239213660941531,"score_spread":0.30940531778652874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990673677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845759,0.0033568395,0.00027420855,0.0015823251,0.002244052,0.00074518705,0.0004376085,0.00002830996,0.0067555406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98475647,0.006507912,0.002451575,0.0010863629,0.0017698096,0.000014225562,0.000050481587,0.00020004806,0.00316312],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906613,0.0005602731,0.002417422,0.00075249927,0.0029263746,0.002682105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930195,0.00027320662,0.0022770297,0.0011995425,0.000010927365,0.0032197984],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020135543,0.0014091388,0.0014563672,0.000322948,0.00068121694,0.00028917377,0.0014116606,0.00058806053,0.05684117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062617604,0.0011407424,0.0014005759,0.00046226603,0.0011614246,0.0030675812,0.0014558529,0.0019179422,0.0024156487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021378347,0.0065437183,0.6869338,0.00004991466,0.0007437027,0.00013408353,0.0022905648,0.0027978427,0.26275644,0.000034748646,0.024239365,0.013262041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024419427,0.0023399303,0.92925775,0.00024584375,0.0006043888,0.000970616,0.0030617765,0.00032808405,0.0063093198,0.00008525669,0.053062238,0.0012928621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037959657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000094879815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2564471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074723563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014629704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149677511","doi":"","title":"A Study on the Permit Method for a New or an Enlarged Facilities According to the Implementation of Air Pollutant Emission-Cap Regulation in Metropolitan Area","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Permission; Judgement; Plan (archaeology); Transport engineering; Air quality index; Environmental science; Business; Engineering; Meteorology; Law; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.04844794069828328,"score_gpt":0.41692740485154717,"score_spread":0.3684794641532639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149677511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897969,0.00001559918,0.006964622,0.0015710427,0.00008478201,0.001267466,0.00009900246,0.0000042608244,0.00019637423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523824,0.000013284842,0.003930268,0.00037051906,0.000090491994,0.000020314334,0.0000059677245,0.000025494035,0.00030544229],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972207,0.00024589247,0.00092119095,0.00025208096,0.00089347607,0.00046668932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998295,0.00041822446,0.00054706563,0.00039199062,0.0000040271157,0.00034369793],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025025816,0.00027702865,0.00035674093,0.00014829024,0.00027422418,0.000036655187,0.00044203908,0.000056999488,0.0019945311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005869002,0.00014086711,0.00022149022,0.00024507273,0.00008118221,0.0003799034,0.00019015714,0.00025677224,0.0000049874093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014524222,0.002571114,0.48737004,0.000009392239,0.00023888939,0.000022190596,0.024084922,0.011480842,0.4315601,0.00008715355,0.0031509183,0.037972014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010922134,0.003224645,0.7761273,0.00002448195,0.000054478394,0.0000281339,0.20909859,0.00020858628,0.009193464,0.00016207217,0.0006349398,0.00015114552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015520342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006161823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42236665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026089423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005527193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W830577942","doi":"10.14249/eia.2012.21.4.525","title":"The Possibility of Investor-State Dispute under Korea US FTA in relation to Korean Environmental Impact Assessment: A Lesson from Bilcon v. Canada Case under NAFTA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Investor-state dispute settlement; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Free trade agreement; Relation (database); International trade; Political science; Business; Law; Free trade; Foreign direct investment","score_opus":0.013707575408170077,"score_gpt":0.3047135169346811,"score_spread":0.291005941526511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W830577942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970475,0.00025759824,0.00018606923,0.00055252813,0.00033505168,0.00059162383,0.0005908979,0.0000070794645,0.00043168187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981679,0.0002883789,0.0007515861,0.00033113698,0.00011908036,0.00001464752,0.00008203888,0.000069358015,0.0001759275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949042,0.0004698277,0.0015099075,0.0004654986,0.0015423776,0.0011081947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656403,0.00039031127,0.0010807619,0.0007485044,0.000003863169,0.0012125052],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001260403,0.00063484116,0.0006820593,0.0001227058,0.0004170996,0.000084024905,0.00057233067,0.00016717806,0.0025268157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022643831,0.00043648508,0.00038329628,0.0002433893,0.00048565393,0.0011197701,0.00064176123,0.0008290296,0.000028937426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013495728,0.0013113144,0.9051282,0.0000042067036,0.00018808024,0.00011604181,0.0007608424,0.026826935,0.06227968,0.000008722062,0.00090035744,0.002340685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013402184,0.0006256232,0.99234957,0.000046778154,0.00009934907,0.00041220666,0.001897022,0.00072249334,0.0012629293,0.00023636164,0.00054251583,0.00046495462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21544416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03820647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1772377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0125946915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019661739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}