{"meta":{"query_hash":"7dfcaf970ae5","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7dfcaf970ae5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Environmental+Impact+Assessment"},"results":[{"id":"W2990673677","doi":"","title":"환경영향평가제도를 둘러싼 한미FTA 투자분쟁의 가능성: Bilcon 대 캐나다 투자자-국가 간 소송 사례를 통한 교훈","year":2012,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Relation (database); Political science; Settlement (finance); Investor-state dispute settlement; Business; International trade; Law; Finance; Foreign direct investment; Computer science","score_opus":0.014516048307624365,"score_gpt":0.3239213660941531,"score_spread":0.30940531778652874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990673677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72293067,0.000946829,0.0069483453,0.00812384,0.00010134021,0.00021752284,0.00012418676,0.000028219525,0.260579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892396,0.00019226404,0.00071617693,0.00077986583,0.000010015796,0.000029610575,0.000027841854,0.0000031108639,0.009001593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997021,0.000646982,0.00015270858,0.00045350753,0.00083224045,0.00089351874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970214,0.0011989732,0.0006437311,0.00021229759,0.0007712642,0.00015240166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026574463,0.00019664598,0.0001877514,0.0007832846,0.0048607513,0.005325533,0.00087523955,0.0027836096,0.005399525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041401563,0.00019246188,0.00039678754,0.0007570436,0.0036434433,0.003950083,0.0019730022,0.0022495706,0.0003433491],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017182503,0.00018105228,0.0691251,0.00018402097,0.000045546996,0.0065376847,0.013463719,0.0028341145,0.0028771535,0.87713474,0.0051799132,0.022265075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013542727,0.00061346655,0.092177905,0.0007555813,0.00033855636,0.009930601,0.17413229,0.029330254,0.021992886,0.24709353,0.42311746,0.00038209616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04979082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055780493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9502092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007886461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007340408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149677511","doi":"","title":"A Study on the Permit Method for a New or an Enlarged Facilities According to the Implementation of Air Pollutant Emission-Cap Regulation in Metropolitan Area","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metropolitan area; Permission; Judgement; Plan (archaeology); Transport engineering; Air quality index; Environmental science; Business; Engineering; Meteorology; Law; Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.04844794069828328,"score_gpt":0.41692740485154717,"score_spread":0.3684794641532639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149677511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6378287,0.0030096555,0.1751405,0.0033499235,0.001049232,0.006805234,0.0007517238,0.00028262893,0.17178239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8674566,0.0020808377,0.10317007,0.0006361005,0.00023150333,0.0027828342,0.00056146586,0.00009998979,0.022980532],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738076,0.009999443,0.0026527715,0.0023061847,0.010055715,0.0011782841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97065175,0.01495611,0.0031172396,0.001615903,0.009034556,0.0006244175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021343824,0.00043551574,0.00039618352,0.0036922847,0.002139225,0.0034708441,0.0019476014,0.0013803777,0.0057678763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04139753,0.0004851944,0.0011843177,0.00354092,0.0021954526,0.0050667436,0.0016811962,0.0020231968,0.0007928129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006819261,0.0012215009,0.16427349,0.0034502863,0.00013651015,0.0023981743,0.024998743,0.009518793,0.011049629,0.30845088,0.017253233,0.4565668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039619277,0.0043115495,0.3115321,0.002470961,0.00070529117,0.0043280898,0.09653088,0.07544347,0.029328931,0.054714337,0.41931334,0.00092485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008324033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009260407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021343824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036357879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006815355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11287832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W830577942","doi":"10.14249/eia.2012.21.4.525","title":"The Possibility of Investor-State Dispute under Korea US FTA in relation to Korean Environmental Impact Assessment: A Lesson from Bilcon v. Canada Case under NAFTA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Investor-state dispute settlement; Government (linguistics); State (computer science); Free trade agreement; Relation (database); International trade; Political science; Business; Law; Free trade; Foreign direct investment","score_opus":0.013707575408170077,"score_gpt":0.3047135169346811,"score_spread":0.291005941526511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W830577942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5933195,0.002732479,0.011191388,0.04566437,0.00020783568,0.00025868948,0.00016295874,0.000037808742,0.346425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900685,0.000575349,0.00081418623,0.0023462947,0.000032395128,0.00003793664,0.000018178122,0.000006042364,0.0061012604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921727,0.0021463418,0.00033297844,0.001044439,0.0017230115,0.0025804879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99296474,0.0043458873,0.0007794154,0.0005029212,0.0010803088,0.00032667935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058274413,0.00036762055,0.0005013386,0.0011500272,0.013247869,0.009500361,0.0017953662,0.0116614215,0.0037855727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01002505,0.000504459,0.00097433856,0.0010286989,0.012747882,0.008613797,0.0042024613,0.009538006,0.00020516764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056455698,0.00005065243,0.008981595,0.00005766952,0.000032725504,0.007211431,0.014468449,0.0012514086,0.000632427,0.95969206,0.0034448463,0.004120219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023278112,0.00025964403,0.019003492,0.00092729984,0.00052775216,0.010380058,0.16993009,0.016509028,0.0077401293,0.53314716,0.24072702,0.00061559246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22193637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25217825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77806365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014842305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01585995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44128913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}