{"meta":{"query_hash":"64a89a259029","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Environmental Law"},"cohort_total":11,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":11,"exported":11,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/64a89a259029","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Environmental+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1980245119","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqm032","title":"Trail Smelter II: Transnational Application of CERCLA","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Jurisdiction; Harm; Damages; Law; Arbitration; Enforcement; Business; Environmental protection; Political science; Environmental science","score_opus":0.007914018391559302,"score_gpt":0.20554763070479237,"score_spread":0.19763361231323306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980245119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017063718,0.002178025,0.0025696345,0.020771995,0.00067604554,0.00021651093,0.000683875,0.00028247453,0.9555577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28382656,0.0024198429,0.0043129846,0.04857414,0.00047608328,0.0003049074,0.0010606997,0.00016155047,0.6588633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378383,0.00061177486,0.0004244855,0.0009144126,0.0026712527,0.0015942529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984554,0.00040979823,0.00012993877,0.00022322327,0.00066654745,0.00011502346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034505334,0.0006464454,0.0003696171,0.0011680896,0.0055976594,0.0059064557,0.0018168403,0.012860636,0.014377901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050476934,0.00069097726,0.00086133677,0.0012198798,0.003152864,0.0032057622,0.0045102527,0.006694354,0.004228791],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009103399,0.000088921784,0.002376328,0.00016611273,0.000025291376,0.002078881,0.0025714,0.0007322111,0.0018705835,0.6732801,0.28740937,0.029309765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007601962,0.00011930002,0.0048841387,0.0003250193,0.000047766473,0.0010349572,0.0015129815,0.0011302335,0.003753416,0.03232743,0.95469445,0.00009429762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13820739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21945028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13820739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063916845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01423589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27480584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982409935","doi":"10.1093/jel/equ037","title":"Innovative Environmental Protection: Lessons from the Arctic","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Arctic; The arctic; Environmental protection; Business; Environmental planning; Environmental resource management; Geography; Environmental science; Oceanography; Geology","score_opus":0.05250261028217714,"score_gpt":0.3009562879446173,"score_spread":0.24845367766244017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982409935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073571086,0.016147293,0.009726542,0.18372492,0.0016644626,0.00005207131,0.000031779113,0.00006523698,0.71501654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9360855,0.012847175,0.004613353,0.01552668,0.0006488042,0.000049615937,0.000039227092,0.00005157765,0.030138137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940789,0.0033207943,0.00013362561,0.00041066663,0.0009590466,0.0010969511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953408,0.002466109,0.00031218794,0.00038581513,0.000635611,0.00085947826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079165995,0.00028791057,0.00040192483,0.000694597,0.010376576,0.008566082,0.0014723977,0.004506921,0.002860261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061405445,0.00016022038,0.0005799582,0.0008134325,0.01460925,0.0054952414,0.007579325,0.004425287,0.00039847568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030226724,0.00006797978,0.0018590445,0.00018492623,0.000015853166,0.000996304,0.023849076,0.0023493858,0.00018424095,0.9196175,0.011145824,0.039699696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001691627,0.000055446162,0.003060618,0.00081419793,0.000017720222,0.00053260534,0.0373139,0.00077675935,0.0005135667,0.27680054,0.68006283,0.000034869747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037033908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06366414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037033908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008588453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017164776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07363671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053920447","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqt015","title":"Insurance between Neighbours: Stannard v Gore and Common Law Liability for Fire","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Liability insurance; Law; Appeal; Statute; Strict liability; Insurance law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Insurance policy; Business; Political science; General insurance","score_opus":0.01727628533201254,"score_gpt":0.28269560693017864,"score_spread":0.2654193215981661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053920447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45122945,0.006176483,0.007241968,0.08939526,0.00033244953,0.00006655325,0.00008192305,0.00004425482,0.44543168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98828447,0.0003636189,0.00048443346,0.0046210224,0.00006031963,0.00001530106,0.00000897889,0.000006243486,0.0061556017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645644,0.0012057144,0.00013844007,0.0005537664,0.0007913605,0.0008542554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997015,0.0018507318,0.00032378102,0.0002704332,0.00021009403,0.00033000368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036097635,0.00014450216,0.00042171415,0.00075040053,0.004467924,0.0044068275,0.0013294176,0.009294518,0.0020618788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009971234,0.000305126,0.0005477742,0.0005010219,0.018811427,0.003896314,0.0044495645,0.005513641,0.0002305663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016761413,0.000011151313,0.0015267651,0.000013214757,0.00000581413,0.0007375392,0.005546203,0.0002234491,0.000084726984,0.9871612,0.0024440242,0.0022291483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012319535,0.00014229794,0.01764448,0.00066007755,0.00008871473,0.003207258,0.019239604,0.004122716,0.0009969468,0.8093926,0.14420177,0.00018032595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07971767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10368278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07971767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044000275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004506279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15850729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097717937","doi":"10.1093/jel/14.3.421","title":"Intergenerational Trusts and Environmental Protection","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Environmental health; Environmental planning; Geography; Medicine","score_opus":0.020480590108337728,"score_gpt":0.22956329343212947,"score_spread":0.20908270332379175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097717937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06606676,0.018436803,0.0010251541,0.056897994,0.000540261,0.00003527644,0.00039516258,0.000041454092,0.8565611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72343343,0.0095103495,0.00031510065,0.0019098184,0.00012415218,0.000022042732,0.00011289575,0.000031441403,0.2645407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979804,0.00042094025,0.00005353982,0.0001315599,0.0005531366,0.00086054124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496895,0.0011356156,0.000644919,0.00030848736,0.001512364,0.0014296927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00149117,0.00021758092,0.00021825996,0.0012907677,0.0071352585,0.007304189,0.0006012798,0.0026622214,0.032544736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061846375,0.0002454226,0.00016243116,0.0037620685,0.0050162496,0.003967984,0.0030348226,0.0026388955,0.0011422869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015030504,0.00003641528,0.006011202,0.00004172565,0.0000096880185,0.0002647095,0.009584597,0.00023845801,0.00003344103,0.8918697,0.06735133,0.024543602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016750393,0.000023433768,0.03759604,0.00049685326,0.00002772413,0.00025250006,0.023110716,0.00042313847,0.00011865474,0.09986127,0.83803123,0.000041641957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7158828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8743155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7158828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02561589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025760394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5715809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168234385","doi":"10.1093/jel/equ013","title":"Changing Conceptions of Rights to Water?--An Eco-Socio-Legal Perspective","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Stewardship (theology); Property rights; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Environmental resource management; Law; Economics; Geography; Politics","score_opus":0.00771990207604537,"score_gpt":0.27506688102961685,"score_spread":0.26734697895357146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168234385","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3253246,0.010657946,0.05421648,0.30162823,0.00070315186,0.00015689558,0.0001720344,0.000057461843,0.30708322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917018,0.0009121383,0.0018631353,0.0025301343,0.00007920813,0.00004897784,0.000021323014,0.000016675602,0.0028266863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98215634,0.011054606,0.0006387822,0.0015441291,0.0027119287,0.001894211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835504,0.010503417,0.0017298736,0.0015414988,0.0017406582,0.00093413965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019550625,0.00041086835,0.0007397323,0.0033558432,0.008051603,0.020429283,0.0023742556,0.0062601357,0.0034355903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01921404,0.00056071236,0.0006852931,0.0026920869,0.11928503,0.029163871,0.00939019,0.007383372,0.00034598715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057827856,0.0000121672,0.00067483966,0.000033511966,0.0000028708116,0.00009120119,0.05296683,0.00016408153,0.00013474384,0.9431852,0.0004576177,0.00227121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012692506,0.000024977742,0.002149162,0.00036780984,0.00000782352,0.00017387465,0.11068412,0.00068824727,0.00026770192,0.81582856,0.069751754,0.000043206634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024976881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015197332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024976881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01948346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077582453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14136308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328603577","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqv006","title":"The International Regulation of Aviation Emissions: Putting Differential Treatment into Practice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Civil aviation; Aviation; Differential (mechanical device); Differential treatment; Kyoto Protocol; Aviation law; Balance (ability); Business; Montreal Protocol; Air transport; International trade; Climate change; Engineering; Aeronautics; Ozone layer; Geography","score_opus":0.01808283002222847,"score_gpt":0.3019508298323697,"score_spread":0.2838679998101412,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328603577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056126468,0.006514602,0.1640065,0.14344251,0.0015838025,0.00013686194,0.00007830665,0.0001699296,0.62794095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94773775,0.0017552947,0.02076401,0.019615792,0.000534983,0.0002031967,0.000040348044,0.00008276506,0.009265826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9580699,0.022805968,0.0022312668,0.004756886,0.009176583,0.0029594682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804232,0.010723386,0.0015837884,0.004246991,0.0024482298,0.00057437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02604763,0.00052139367,0.0006663015,0.001600821,0.006367138,0.011815898,0.002865801,0.010604245,0.0019324825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029021112,0.0004396371,0.000779486,0.0013732624,0.062439844,0.013358152,0.009869016,0.013645703,0.00038352754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001975585,0.000007098348,0.00013411045,0.000011862026,0.000001562161,0.000019605392,0.0019494664,0.00013626074,0.00008775716,0.99485165,0.00050792564,0.0022907718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011239647,0.000035334677,0.00062042114,0.0004122295,0.000013512386,0.00007392547,0.0033183317,0.00090807385,0.0006054304,0.91684234,0.07712361,0.000035585395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075307763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007267851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02604763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009348936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009621109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13775468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761502688","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqx024","title":"The Legality of Downgrading Nationally Determined Contributions under the Paris Agreement: Lessons from the US Disengagement","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Environmental Policies and Emissions","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Metcalf Foundation","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Downgrade; Normative; Interim; Principle of legality; Convention; Interpretation (philosophy); Government (linguistics); Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Computer security; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01696502861809226,"score_gpt":0.2757264427843077,"score_spread":0.25876141416621545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761502688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059902847,0.003302394,0.041964617,0.109006256,0.0011772501,0.00009806062,0.00020749714,0.00023584688,0.7841052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8992005,0.00144325,0.00895863,0.03090585,0.0007217943,0.00028152115,0.000114734066,0.00020671736,0.058167025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762803,0.010821039,0.000968158,0.0034729165,0.0049276706,0.0035298788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98752034,0.007430434,0.00065742666,0.0017356949,0.0022690727,0.00038698572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020876875,0.0007248852,0.0007403275,0.0014855448,0.01092415,0.01692182,0.0029595753,0.014782219,0.008247946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029512508,0.0005399411,0.0015395728,0.0015348222,0.024174158,0.011632626,0.009520979,0.016314909,0.0011003477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058160203,0.000004245444,0.0001279527,0.0000069421694,0.000003738525,0.00006064994,0.000890797,0.00026038525,0.000028188573,0.9951663,0.001951698,0.0014932995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053834163,0.000050447175,0.0010194585,0.00030220524,0.000042797514,0.00014051859,0.0036566597,0.0019155992,0.00071010116,0.77124923,0.22075391,0.00010525651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07184935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050945364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07184935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016666071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015765171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14286226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944490825","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqz011","title":"Contagious Environmental Lawmaking","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Phenomenon; Terminology; Environmental law; Dimension (graph theory); Transferability; Sociology; Narrative; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Environmental ethics; Computer science; Legislature; Linguistics","score_opus":0.005635714218159153,"score_gpt":0.24151661330545085,"score_spread":0.2358808990872917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944490825","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.333758,0.0032563747,0.12173906,0.033632223,0.00042693346,0.00036481526,0.00009063493,0.00025368316,0.5064783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930351,0.00023869878,0.002244001,0.00061655324,0.00004256039,0.00003592115,0.000013246438,0.000030416772,0.0037435272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783367,0.0119283125,0.0007417463,0.0033481608,0.004101838,0.0015432003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9511282,0.033929262,0.0033776723,0.007661268,0.0027982532,0.0011053721],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023844905,0.00045048492,0.00059385615,0.0023515094,0.0065547903,0.010318551,0.0023710749,0.005000393,0.005323061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040872205,0.00038094982,0.00054606487,0.0021681911,0.053466592,0.0161035,0.012628647,0.006132701,0.00035606028],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015846515,0.000022679591,0.0015055225,0.000079292455,0.0000137128145,0.000549071,0.0496174,0.00046882618,0.00044737884,0.9341796,0.0010810834,0.01201955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000146313505,0.000047480367,0.0018022684,0.00047776426,0.000029266455,0.0006591861,0.03983458,0.002606304,0.0015130666,0.8365337,0.11643285,0.00004896261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002985587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024168037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023844905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059171747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042224755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12610549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189363736","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqab018","title":"Improving Energy Efficiency: The Significance of Normativity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Norm (philosophy); Efficient energy use; Set (abstract data type); Scale (ratio); Energy law; Business; Energy (signal processing); Empirical research; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Environmental law; Law; Computer science; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.009130639284356923,"score_gpt":0.1855976975101531,"score_spread":0.17646705822579617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189363736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22882612,0.0031198007,0.12652758,0.09164833,0.00040951415,0.0001585576,0.00007853738,0.00013275606,0.54909885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938793,0.0002905589,0.0032519677,0.0012480032,0.000045897614,0.00003933799,0.000009481594,0.000018538549,0.0012168502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9206335,0.058982573,0.0020433734,0.0032169335,0.012569912,0.0025537494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88446033,0.07848482,0.010369944,0.01160186,0.012786068,0.00229696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05276989,0.000253322,0.0005646777,0.0018042104,0.004405541,0.010592694,0.0016458082,0.00283175,0.0022120557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053878408,0.0002644435,0.0003768178,0.0018380781,0.06620626,0.011413959,0.0063758087,0.0040929085,0.0002667318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110761475,0.000029558429,0.0021129232,0.00007024584,0.000009480818,0.00003358102,0.012856874,0.0005632243,0.00018108943,0.9721664,0.0010354267,0.010930104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021019629,0.000068390626,0.00575752,0.00051278615,0.000016192475,0.00008004921,0.022789624,0.0019438987,0.000992631,0.8987843,0.06898858,0.000045096054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006231247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004129373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05276989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059528914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009990311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27907717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197346424","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqab023","title":"Climate Disruption in Canadian Constitutional Law: <i>References Re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Climate change; Indigenous; Greenhouse gas; Political science; Legislation; Federalism; Constitutional law; Constitutional court; Politics; Constitution; Ecology","score_opus":0.015466877055837443,"score_gpt":0.2677172318364936,"score_spread":0.25225035478065616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197346424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053109,0.0047998414,0.0028557442,0.099271715,0.00063018093,0.00014627664,0.0011177018,0.00009454098,0.83797514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.901232,0.0027566715,0.002156855,0.031681437,0.0002793075,0.00008919204,0.00034719185,0.000055681092,0.06140161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869583,0.0011092452,0.00024062132,0.0011008187,0.0060051987,0.0045857523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924644,0.0022218626,0.00025622768,0.00028436352,0.003932976,0.00084013585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005736602,0.00046080482,0.00041980395,0.0028967478,0.025218766,0.017951054,0.0032021226,0.0066248383,0.007860373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013590554,0.0005410299,0.0007460294,0.004040992,0.01732958,0.0025696359,0.003130071,0.0075313994,0.00044073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007811215,0.000009401785,0.0009953176,0.000022418055,0.0000070031106,0.00014240525,0.0029396417,0.00061626616,0.00018266616,0.97007734,0.021921355,0.0030784009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052039275,0.00002868058,0.016772475,0.00053116895,0.00011630943,0.00012212685,0.011530486,0.004158799,0.00081018894,0.17523667,0.7903444,0.00029668974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9942279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2088655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2088655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25850913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9176039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201287929","doi":"10.1093/jel/eqab026","title":"Recent Youth-Led and Rights-Based Climate Change Litigation in Canada: Reconciling Justiciability, Charter Claims and Procedural Choices","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Law","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Class action; Political science; Climate change; Action (physics); Authorization; Law; Human rights","score_opus":0.022591837800407542,"score_gpt":0.256503518652654,"score_spread":0.23391168085224642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201287929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80708396,0.0058169584,0.0013456016,0.048328552,0.00024990478,0.0001498856,0.0005892404,0.00004024717,0.1363957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98667186,0.0014981799,0.00049580616,0.0038748193,0.00003753568,0.000028425411,0.00014260769,0.000015510916,0.0072353026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98309416,0.0012833602,0.00045053253,0.001113222,0.0074059856,0.006652737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790278,0.0062124166,0.0022139037,0.00053590833,0.008611299,0.0033986967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010496028,0.00028113095,0.0005431139,0.0039642653,0.033127457,0.010215369,0.0038520116,0.005104371,0.003532177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025142765,0.0005092837,0.0005729219,0.0057194685,0.012592405,0.0018908251,0.0041940426,0.0070375227,0.00017918285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023701125,0.00025230242,0.1619522,0.0003357326,0.00020626328,0.004443641,0.19584002,0.002910417,0.0019135233,0.49363226,0.06711329,0.07116333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011838139,0.0001226728,0.3777431,0.0010537427,0.00044238425,0.0011571378,0.2324312,0.0044896123,0.003135296,0.019184142,0.3596222,0.0005000919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19141302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19141302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21018088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9378463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}