{"meta":{"query_hash":"cf88f9fbd1f9","filters":{"venue":"Journal of European Public Policy"},"cohort_total":30,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":30,"exported":30,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cf88f9fbd1f9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+European+Public+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W2009765887","doi":"10.1080/1350176042000273586","title":"An exchange-rate regime for the euro","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Global Financial Crisis and Policies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exchange rate; Economics; Intervention (counseling); Quarter (Canadian coin); Monetary policy; Corporate governance; Maastricht Treaty; Treaty; International economics; Control (management); Power (physics); Monetary economics; Finance; Political science; European union; European integration","score_opus":0.053121629573139165,"score_gpt":0.2671792647052238,"score_spread":0.21405763513208464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2009765887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.110462144,0.013555642,0.03956522,0.03811203,0.0044014137,0.00014680994,0.0007249884,0.00025799288,0.79277384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90700173,0.0042278077,0.014201124,0.01238725,0.002375723,0.00039965237,0.00031558095,0.00014904296,0.058942094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869007,0.0005424216,0.0001307119,0.00026109428,0.00025880215,0.000116838535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947625,0.00012290482,0.00016999229,0.00010637744,0.000091041955,0.000033397762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022194025,0.00026011947,0.0002674744,0.0005587616,0.00094506826,0.0034629118,0.00035810875,0.0018209794,0.0023970022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00474533,0.00009664572,0.00028978655,0.00084578036,0.0019398883,0.0019305419,0.0012270163,0.003179591,0.0006248194],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003630553,0.000007504555,0.00040726064,0.000028669057,0.0000034018228,0.00003650015,0.00029671146,0.00020887231,0.0002926018,0.9858963,0.0048811613,0.007904666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009848927,0.00018260126,0.008180566,0.0004720108,0.000034493747,0.00036530092,0.0004752462,0.0015164994,0.0014602981,0.4039301,0.5832282,0.00005628332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011904769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008717049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034629118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012231097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007224332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011737466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016017172","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2011.560488","title":"The Lisbon Strategy and the politicization of EU policy-making: the case of the Services Directive","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Directive; Lisbon Strategy; Politics; European union; Public administration; Member state; Political science; State (computer science); Political economy; Policy making; Member states; Economic system; Economics; Economic policy; Law","score_opus":0.03406308799184091,"score_gpt":0.30798056988675276,"score_spread":0.27391748189491183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016017172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14869386,0.007913662,0.010067898,0.14026773,0.0010470634,0.000083214756,0.000086658154,0.00013116101,0.6917088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94930923,0.0011336853,0.002055964,0.014346585,0.00014397338,0.00011817542,0.000025679457,0.00012156724,0.032745104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.971437,0.01894512,0.0006529321,0.00163388,0.0027325477,0.0045985645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99289495,0.004683948,0.00067224115,0.000525052,0.0005464761,0.0006772249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026464984,0.00086738204,0.0007990957,0.0017688416,0.017807025,0.026411882,0.0015993798,0.022057656,0.004368502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018935595,0.00080190407,0.0013482601,0.0036400002,0.029460996,0.009222558,0.012672447,0.009572455,0.0008507574],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051383744,0.000010347823,0.00018302079,0.0000381841,0.0000071306913,0.00039600395,0.00435486,0.00076144724,0.0000675828,0.989214,0.0026558165,0.0022602307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014855103,0.00008653551,0.0014276209,0.0008319666,0.000035230638,0.0005240909,0.01840535,0.0024043957,0.0015411065,0.4108919,0.5635519,0.00015131908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034900676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043141704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041452795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041452795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02842128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30076247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052697749","doi":"10.1080/1350176042000311925","title":"Beyond delegation: transnational regulatory regimes and the eu regulatory state","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":408,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Technische Universität München; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Regulatory state; Delegation; Legitimacy; Dilemma; Economic system; Corporate governance; State (computer science); Democracy; Economics; Political science; Business; Political economy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.016594834343062404,"score_gpt":0.27160481130794917,"score_spread":0.25500997696488675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052697749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121224515,0.0094702365,0.0852456,0.05349768,0.00048404696,0.000072822884,0.000055632467,0.0001065891,0.7298427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98808783,0.0011629873,0.002599455,0.0019690427,0.00013613104,0.00006950354,0.000016154194,0.0000297258,0.0059290775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860486,0.0077724014,0.0005378594,0.0017634606,0.0020496044,0.0018280743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898886,0.0061998707,0.0011508204,0.0013984388,0.00085946504,0.0005029291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013803884,0.00030739882,0.00064798124,0.001491469,0.0037094674,0.01093543,0.0010781068,0.0043379413,0.0035803672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016944015,0.00024245604,0.00065379933,0.0018370468,0.030752346,0.011584994,0.008053752,0.005425235,0.0003815899],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039683314,0.0000034775487,0.000116605,0.0000075191238,0.0000015829161,0.000014681406,0.00084297743,0.00023168077,0.000026468477,0.99672526,0.0001478429,0.0018779723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018932004,0.000017034034,0.0006862131,0.00015637891,0.000007819668,0.000052940384,0.0015302375,0.00080744654,0.000192899,0.9600686,0.03644715,0.000014239935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003291432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021695534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013803884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051115267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049267565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073002815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080359500","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2014.981568","title":"Ideas beyond paradigms: relative commensurability and the case of Canadian trade-industrial policy, 1975–95","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commensurability (mathematics); Epistemology; Criticism; Positive economics; Sociology; Perception; Economics; Law and economics; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.05866075739382583,"score_gpt":0.31761152903256556,"score_spread":0.25895077163873975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080359500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12579456,0.006877617,0.011299698,0.048576705,0.000205856,0.00015705689,0.0001192442,0.000057738507,0.80691147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836404,0.0008996376,0.0024526152,0.001265924,0.000029579813,0.00006299038,0.000026196243,0.000014914501,0.011607708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870661,0.0042579724,0.00028680923,0.00086344,0.003469972,0.004055758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99600405,0.0015631735,0.0003082301,0.0003940534,0.0012619165,0.00046859082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010823568,0.00070366217,0.0005114351,0.004774946,0.0352713,0.01558675,0.0026193298,0.006021307,0.0032736638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016576154,0.00040153158,0.0011106409,0.0076891533,0.05449097,0.0074734255,0.006106649,0.0064457846,0.00020139456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046434843,0.0000026586392,0.00009827374,0.0000070290534,0.0000019151523,0.000047557845,0.0038155143,0.00026124058,0.000020528243,0.9939407,0.00043168032,0.0013683337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054705615,0.000027448748,0.0031938558,0.00020678628,0.000039098573,0.00015717525,0.01616455,0.002604426,0.00023442305,0.81145054,0.16578333,0.00008360604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92820096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9198398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20593292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20593292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12273478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92100525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110057417","doi":"10.1080/13501760600924191","title":"Punctuated equilibrium in French budgeting processes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Fiscal Policies and Political Economy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Collège Lionel Groulx","funders":"","keywords":"Incrementalism; Punctuated equilibrium; State (computer science); Parliament; Economics; Neutrality; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.026076653162282103,"score_gpt":0.22225906166472256,"score_spread":0.19618240850244045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110057417","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488989,0.00036766875,0.040689047,0.00074128155,0.00001166832,0.000044898785,0.0003029369,0.00014958413,0.008793997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977196,0.000060969647,0.0015738464,0.000018524599,0.000004648859,0.000026563444,0.000083581086,0.0000056599356,0.0005067095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458355,0.0026433768,0.00024727252,0.000927674,0.0006533734,0.0009446618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826902,0.010951436,0.003430439,0.0013391777,0.0010950093,0.0004938159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008244566,0.000444009,0.0013731315,0.0034676227,0.0014196661,0.0038542738,0.0009793773,0.0009432475,0.005057615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033314835,0.00033414538,0.0012127039,0.0028625913,0.0035741378,0.0025155856,0.0016886323,0.00088997907,0.0003578301],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004764276,0.00012785029,0.077881336,0.00016041723,0.0002812375,0.00053487864,0.0051581194,0.22992943,0.0009998507,0.65533996,0.0011552647,0.027955249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021878997,0.00019301001,0.06379948,0.00009632824,0.00007189157,0.0001859444,0.0022972054,0.35013023,0.00070011546,0.57579505,0.0063781207,0.00013377206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038830526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018361742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038830526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007815619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015925331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077208996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336610092","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2016.1272623","title":"Executive-legislative relations and inter-parliamentary cooperation in federal systems – lessons for the European Union","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Polity; Legislature; Political science; Politics; Separation of powers; Public administration; Parliament; Member states; European union; Political economy; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.0635535367123541,"score_gpt":0.3483344493367125,"score_spread":0.2847809126243584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336610092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6638804,0.008227873,0.00739444,0.017299535,0.00011020573,0.00003343074,0.000062175684,0.000040345327,0.30295157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974009,0.00026101424,0.00042781682,0.00027988057,0.000013772053,0.00000588822,0.000014913082,0.0000033228048,0.0015924341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911212,0.0048587886,0.00025901466,0.0008565131,0.000763669,0.0021408396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481684,0.0025602567,0.00080066273,0.0006903638,0.00050759723,0.0006243204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008806201,0.00015187843,0.00036587974,0.0019934126,0.0041872575,0.009882262,0.0009050597,0.0024895356,0.004621795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009451072,0.00019046724,0.00048687667,0.0029280877,0.011295138,0.006412489,0.0041329414,0.001443694,0.0003539358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066054905,0.00007332413,0.014714637,0.00005999238,0.000031881897,0.00010539217,0.010965472,0.0016375398,0.00017054453,0.9460261,0.0011491365,0.024999993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010230242,0.00023822734,0.22634977,0.0009986404,0.00009316386,0.0002968779,0.0632038,0.005597308,0.0012000119,0.55127114,0.15056433,0.00008438489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018227657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01936523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018227657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00773906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044786325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05615115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752277348","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2017.1363807","title":"Introduction: the European Semester as a new architecture of EU socioeconomic governance in theory and practice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":166,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Universiteit van Amsterdam; European Commission","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Multi-level governance; Corporate governance; Architecture; European union; Economic governance; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Regional science; Economics; Management; International trade; Geography; Demography","score_opus":0.020869330990753474,"score_gpt":0.3275546040226535,"score_spread":0.3066852730319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752277348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050807174,0.03033562,0.072331734,0.20273349,0.019608537,0.00022632333,0.0012869204,0.00054769934,0.6221225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79643774,0.020470522,0.03722931,0.029056694,0.0076336227,0.0004815439,0.0009954032,0.0004297817,0.1072654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974146,0.0015938112,0.00012947644,0.0002933074,0.00035758968,0.00021128073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977724,0.00131148,0.00019436753,0.00019924038,0.00023427252,0.00028821593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003644745,0.00042154096,0.00031963267,0.0007852924,0.0019756076,0.007716865,0.0008453888,0.003611539,0.012802259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055915737,0.00017109206,0.00046914307,0.00133317,0.0047582453,0.006076897,0.0045806146,0.0044904817,0.00145055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020045656,0.000019103762,0.00046428764,0.0001160028,0.000002723448,0.000046831166,0.0044364366,0.00030895724,0.00009894021,0.9309336,0.03694692,0.026606197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073202336,0.000036751644,0.0012124412,0.00054950395,0.000003251437,0.00015389577,0.0028718072,0.0004620774,0.0001747487,0.18027824,0.81422645,0.000023556384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011431506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011215786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012802259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024060498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021867985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042827845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890079266","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2018.1526203","title":"The paradox of human rights conditionality in EU trade policy: when strategic interests drive policy outcomes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Conditionality; Human rights; Negotiation; Politics; Parliament; European union; Context (archaeology); Political science; Political economy; Economics; International trade; Law and economics; Public administration; Economic system; Law","score_opus":0.06774267794776596,"score_gpt":0.37444746613214064,"score_spread":0.3067047881843747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890079266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3647791,0.0031406032,0.038544465,0.120606795,0.00033127138,0.00013043908,0.00013113556,0.00009534866,0.47224075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964743,0.00021895216,0.00088738656,0.0013894531,0.00005457489,0.000038336028,0.000012079522,0.000015662175,0.00090917223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98098516,0.010411412,0.0008554316,0.0023317286,0.002810159,0.0026061526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618505,0.027267693,0.004109334,0.0019766788,0.0024363028,0.0023594592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02717373,0.0004951684,0.0008937194,0.002830315,0.004647617,0.017042002,0.0013397716,0.005578346,0.0065988083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05954642,0.0005526393,0.0005905809,0.0032418577,0.024597613,0.014032705,0.011159631,0.0076719634,0.00038511134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038408685,0.000029702644,0.0017536574,0.000058881666,0.000019673369,0.000074371026,0.0016570375,0.00095043564,0.00011942571,0.9881065,0.00078991044,0.0064021144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027739932,0.000019902656,0.003482876,0.00008637853,0.000015735679,0.000021874348,0.0019582226,0.0012481554,0.00022747036,0.98668474,0.006211045,0.000015908145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048240093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036267044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02717373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008348176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007173515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14371014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2892454506","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2018.1526204","title":"Neofunctionalism and EU external policy integration: the case of capacity building in support of security and development (CBSD)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik; European Commission; Canadian Patient Safety Institute","keywords":"Framing (construction); Commission; Spillover effect; Security policy; European commission; Economic system; Sociology; Political science; Public administration; Political economy; Economics; International trade; European union; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Engineering; Civil engineering; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.04784295412135985,"score_gpt":0.3211721390812594,"score_spread":0.27332918495989955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2892454506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2112083,0.0018051506,0.04783294,0.03313927,0.00022537638,0.00011849665,0.000032857293,0.000069707574,0.70556796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99209166,0.00020025743,0.002186222,0.0011634114,0.00003028702,0.000075929165,0.000011080819,0.000023264842,0.0042179446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796479,0.014049223,0.00042762532,0.0012681338,0.0016574479,0.002949599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486214,0.0029082044,0.0005204173,0.0008558055,0.0004364529,0.00041702262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017416663,0.0007294575,0.000646866,0.0021314947,0.0110506285,0.014867323,0.0018331646,0.0075169643,0.0034349225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010559453,0.00040215766,0.0009951546,0.002605406,0.053023577,0.01168592,0.018900083,0.005316866,0.0002944261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055954524,0.0000070536043,0.00013670712,0.000008864178,0.0000025397408,0.00012657215,0.0029126385,0.00032487034,0.000027569218,0.995096,0.00014121881,0.0012103776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033656044,0.00004011318,0.00080873864,0.00025130776,0.000016208272,0.00032969422,0.012691173,0.0026820877,0.0003655795,0.92317146,0.059581216,0.000028829492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047676004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036337555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017416663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014862259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008826631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10783374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982276715","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2019.1678059","title":"EU trade policy in the twenty-first century: change, continuity and challenges","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Commercial policy; International trade; European union; Treaty; Political science; Trade barrier; Free trade; Economics; International economics; Law","score_opus":0.06252990554465744,"score_gpt":0.3050068418795511,"score_spread":0.2424769363348937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982276715","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02509424,0.5489158,0.0062421714,0.17988119,0.02228728,0.000028570323,0.0002547181,0.0001048612,0.21719119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40226838,0.47471645,0.007203254,0.048310425,0.01887952,0.000108175525,0.00054891384,0.00024017283,0.04772458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970579,0.0011697818,0.000268761,0.00032994646,0.00081448327,0.00035914264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975172,0.0015216732,0.0002457443,0.00018093095,0.00034806077,0.00018634401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042128004,0.0004336687,0.00066484796,0.0025466743,0.0026521438,0.014913347,0.00077965466,0.0040107504,0.0034896769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073511763,0.00022752077,0.0005790573,0.006281428,0.005322987,0.008708453,0.0034400322,0.0043830317,0.0005879455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034235058,0.000030561907,0.0007307007,0.0006284477,0.00002817563,0.000211581,0.0071320212,0.00083796185,0.00021869884,0.8632983,0.052103527,0.07474581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031287732,0.000020462296,0.0014066563,0.0015231665,0.000006246728,0.00022346817,0.004074041,0.00016545427,0.00015537682,0.12203507,0.87036425,0.000022727465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026176723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027754598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014913347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006213249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004247442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045080483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011208377","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2020.1737957","title":"Austerity and the path of least resistance: how fiscal consolidations crowd out long-term investments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Austerity; Economics; Retrenchment; Fiscal policy; Population; Public capital; Economic policy; Labour economics; Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Public investment; Political science","score_opus":0.07732178969322734,"score_gpt":0.335588772026141,"score_spread":0.2582669823329137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011208377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9126515,0.0017486821,0.009685825,0.023009596,0.00012464856,0.00006671129,0.00035020584,0.000085293475,0.052277472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971776,0.00025248504,0.0007684297,0.00037917175,0.00002387818,0.000016486874,0.000042982938,0.000023293034,0.0013156667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802506,0.0006919346,0.00008398091,0.0002880292,0.0002840726,0.00062692753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897656,0.0037786206,0.0036549065,0.00065323955,0.0008587532,0.0012889053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003453968,0.00031550968,0.0007783515,0.0016992352,0.0018890441,0.006382878,0.0009288485,0.0014263781,0.009120641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02322022,0.0003168224,0.000651765,0.0017581468,0.0061233584,0.007686392,0.005796519,0.0021019392,0.0006383297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008515828,0.00026898424,0.21485363,0.0003203934,0.00029586972,0.0009483031,0.018796623,0.016163135,0.001531832,0.66560894,0.009410574,0.07095016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013795262,0.00039319965,0.23639666,0.00077451195,0.00023313556,0.0003219729,0.03258868,0.013109878,0.0012886123,0.6635594,0.05104871,0.00014737059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01157122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010390476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01157122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036439174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030543734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030511618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138691937","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2021.1901961","title":"Political work in the stability and growth pact","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Stability and Growth Pact; Political economy; Ideology; Agency (philosophy); Political science; European union; Commission; Pact; Public administration; Sociology; Work (physics); Discretion; Power (physics); Law; Economics; Social science; Economic policy","score_opus":0.05321068266836101,"score_gpt":0.3196712844208346,"score_spread":0.2664606017524736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138691937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43932417,0.0027803942,0.009149067,0.031986956,0.00039185432,0.0000625111,0.000037952268,0.0000545822,0.51621246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99516255,0.00025034967,0.00033051198,0.0005929086,0.000056955523,0.000020962158,0.0000069295756,0.000023055825,0.003555837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9766217,0.017181082,0.00043416908,0.0014206013,0.0019055832,0.0024368735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870978,0.009161597,0.0012810285,0.00085467246,0.00056777813,0.0010370618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017543418,0.00027695842,0.00044091107,0.0018168108,0.014538646,0.01511142,0.0008153539,0.002627852,0.0030069007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017752588,0.00029146395,0.00032222323,0.0027806936,0.05458345,0.0059176604,0.006930114,0.0043512355,0.00031160918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035050412,0.000031739295,0.0032147032,0.000057801528,0.0000066599832,0.00032107046,0.20255746,0.0003433606,0.0002403588,0.7778441,0.0026519734,0.012695726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036510035,0.00007248897,0.013273449,0.00056320033,0.000016677026,0.00031643783,0.33808503,0.0007809585,0.0007364465,0.19645797,0.4496027,0.000058161375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044257618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043297955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017543418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009171126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065679136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09277958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308381542","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2022.2140819","title":"Protest in unlikely times: dynamics of collective mobilization in Europe during the COVID-19 crisis","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; European University Institute","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Mobilization; Context (archaeology); Social distance; Government (linguistics); Political science; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Political economy; Development economics; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.03647856308069546,"score_gpt":0.33190103144527106,"score_spread":0.2954224683645756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308381542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990914,0.00051051547,0.00050669437,0.00061821326,0.000024806392,0.0000140885395,0.0014414686,0.000023590084,0.0059467508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99744934,0.0001811232,0.00014906334,0.00006076653,0.000022710996,0.000015445868,0.0013250872,0.00000872363,0.000787686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906045,0.0002586055,0.00006670267,0.00020907287,0.00014800116,0.00025718662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99702734,0.0010716915,0.0010703218,0.00015415448,0.00022757845,0.0004489417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014649461,0.0002172387,0.00036333696,0.002038498,0.00055419304,0.00304665,0.00035906662,0.0010041537,0.0035664635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005938125,0.0001428663,0.00028891643,0.0021159863,0.0007262352,0.0015633225,0.0026931162,0.00086571614,0.00057501986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011813766,0.00045296052,0.870706,0.0003453328,0.0003096643,0.0015218942,0.018309288,0.0087941615,0.0016844862,0.020080414,0.021685679,0.0549288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025837155,0.00008795434,0.9637554,0.00011604515,0.000025585141,0.00023514511,0.013766274,0.0033285678,0.00025530191,0.0021935336,0.016173653,0.000036673846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005516186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004645873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005516186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006514672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034860693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011931062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309074932","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2022.2141300","title":"Explaining the response of the ECB to the COVID-19 related economic crisis: inter-crisis and intra-crisis learning","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Energy Research Institute, Nanyang Technological University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European University Institute; European Commission","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); European debt crisis; European union; Financial crisis; Crisis response; Crisis management; Political science; Debt crisis; Economic governance; Sovereign debt; Economics; Sovereignty; Corporate governance; Economic policy; Debt; European integration; Keynesian economics; Medicine; Macroeconomics; Public relations; Politics","score_opus":0.034375396951318485,"score_gpt":0.3142739795565044,"score_spread":0.2798985826051859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309074932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.723871,0.001121614,0.014559114,0.085762404,0.00030728194,0.00013559744,0.000100891615,0.000060819868,0.1740813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99346197,0.00049894,0.0012469046,0.0010034182,0.000023997198,0.00002943419,0.000039241975,0.000015866217,0.0036801759],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99634117,0.002705861,0.000068528796,0.00017998854,0.00022151977,0.00048293688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912531,0.0070906878,0.0006847356,0.00021047356,0.00039289065,0.0003681055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006613773,0.00044231585,0.00023868345,0.0008851679,0.004193989,0.0070845378,0.0013884294,0.0040243603,0.0049849227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010800063,0.00021258977,0.00028577255,0.0010334074,0.0133722555,0.00836819,0.0048605185,0.0052589388,0.00040276774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007422129,0.00020458171,0.0081356345,0.00019230453,0.000017736555,0.0016251798,0.58313555,0.0049567767,0.00065668026,0.36696017,0.0071889255,0.026852239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003648699,0.000087192144,0.007299855,0.00063373876,0.000015768197,0.00023975053,0.7018366,0.008469786,0.001171135,0.1813717,0.09877521,0.000062779334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006986275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00734665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070845378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058460794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030079414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042416513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317840281","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2022.2141305","title":"The COVID-19 pandemic and the European Union: politics, policies and institutions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":95,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; European University Institute; European Commission","keywords":"European union; Scrutiny; Political science; Member states; Legitimacy; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Crisis management; Politics; Pandemic; Political economy; Member state; Development economics; Public administration; International trade; Law; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.10972871297803945,"score_gpt":0.3692328909734394,"score_spread":0.2595041779954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317840281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08610539,0.09419675,0.0048293886,0.36321723,0.0037481892,0.000045090164,0.0001113096,0.00008700587,0.44765955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8782538,0.024519973,0.0031597358,0.06989446,0.0015054308,0.000092108414,0.00010146053,0.00009028088,0.02238272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99272585,0.004267258,0.00028901,0.0006771696,0.00081820786,0.0012224921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99686545,0.0017791946,0.00043966167,0.0002193933,0.00022855803,0.00046775214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011479961,0.00033497563,0.0005503015,0.001251132,0.0047978736,0.015189042,0.00095566997,0.014046388,0.0034945984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011101353,0.00031802076,0.0004326282,0.0027142407,0.014093465,0.008177086,0.006693977,0.0052592284,0.0004034175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025062845,0.000018429424,0.0006059803,0.00006936731,0.00000753678,0.00012291879,0.002881437,0.00043731646,0.000081783466,0.96855855,0.013456724,0.0137348715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028318835,0.00005332679,0.006237879,0.0013206546,0.000012014117,0.00023809129,0.0086656995,0.00063696626,0.00023557183,0.39652795,0.5859764,0.0000670371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00496962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033482187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015189042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005849883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005590455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060712576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327814283","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2188081","title":"The core of organisational reputation: taking multidimensionality, audience multiplicity, and agency subunits seriously","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Corporate Identity and Reputation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Economic and Social Research Council; Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek; European Commission; Agencia Estatal de Investigación; Réseau de cancérologie Rossy; Princeton University","keywords":"Reputation; Agency (philosophy); Core (optical fiber); Business; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Social science; Law; Engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.07057685041376308,"score_gpt":0.28464176028002847,"score_spread":0.2140649098662654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327814283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76470846,0.008595273,0.09586493,0.021821713,0.00032590327,0.00013776423,0.000170477,0.00012862869,0.10824681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99649245,0.0002532602,0.0026996008,0.0001181653,0.000071430826,0.000023993418,0.000016532966,0.00001065946,0.000313917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836204,0.008898756,0.0010219081,0.0023025125,0.0030898254,0.0010665734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90978295,0.04429095,0.01859758,0.014389096,0.006625246,0.0063141417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015131147,0.0004837831,0.0014053266,0.0056647784,0.0034455636,0.014537846,0.0013916356,0.00196997,0.0031960797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06399472,0.0005622563,0.00081671745,0.004262916,0.02186499,0.024920722,0.012765735,0.003204193,0.00025250312],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003102513,0.00015194168,0.12248593,0.0004094308,0.00025811532,0.00031106634,0.04517584,0.0019230534,0.0013423567,0.7361702,0.0013490635,0.09011282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074572345,0.00028867088,0.12615901,0.000535537,0.00023390372,0.0006742604,0.03223799,0.007066262,0.0005926335,0.81833166,0.013628684,0.00017690817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019427616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017515745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015131147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031696048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021935364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0800221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362589933","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2194323","title":"United we stood, divided we transform? Exploring coalition transformation divergence in the EU trade policy field","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Political Influence and Corporate Strategies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS","keywords":"Negotiation; Divergence (linguistics); Politics; Ideology; Political science; Civil society; Order (exchange); Opportunity structures; Political economy; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.1385347569760256,"score_gpt":0.2953264105785269,"score_spread":0.15679165360250127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362589933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93168443,0.0012507058,0.002940973,0.0087900935,0.000114219634,0.00007953234,0.000037422204,0.000011573228,0.055091027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832934,0.00019474496,0.00024233604,0.00034024357,0.000010332223,0.000031016498,0.000022379367,0.000012533674,0.0008170734],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97408164,0.018546505,0.00072551763,0.0015752078,0.0016610954,0.0034100926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972379,0.020282116,0.0023004566,0.0010519593,0.0016779711,0.0023084462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027817268,0.00040614215,0.00085944135,0.0042390525,0.015531949,0.022216337,0.00244189,0.0032407423,0.0036864094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04207158,0.0004988684,0.00040535288,0.0043412424,0.025884753,0.014357665,0.019126343,0.004639987,0.0002871625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074850046,0.00006208708,0.008928791,0.00008128817,0.000017432018,0.00029950726,0.9141534,0.00011533474,0.00023754989,0.06228083,0.00059238344,0.013156471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009887404,0.000018787041,0.005973506,0.00011572104,0.000004871638,0.00007361467,0.96685255,0.00019632226,0.000116027586,0.012496402,0.014128956,0.000013350433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013004238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011896427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027817268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01175002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009026987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1471135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362666768","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2177323","title":"Who got what they wanted? Investigating the role of institutional agenda setting, costly policies, and status quo bias as explanations to income based unequal responsiveness","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd; Université de Genève; Göteborgs Universitet; McGill University; Vetenskapsrådet; American Political Science Association","keywords":"Status quo; Status quo bias; Politics; Public economics; Political science; Economics; Political economy; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.10051613958960848,"score_gpt":0.3778903969011823,"score_spread":0.27737425731157384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362666768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9703349,0.00022036525,0.0009966273,0.0037823105,0.000024762785,0.00002745723,0.000053174466,0.0000057779403,0.02455463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926835,0.000054332686,0.00006536222,0.00014781048,0.000011538689,0.000006626396,0.000012862262,0.0000031676427,0.00042990063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380267,0.0035819856,0.00019947306,0.00041348356,0.00068043405,0.001321912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97432786,0.018285912,0.0045256377,0.0010271787,0.0009012824,0.0009321839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010347399,0.0001862746,0.00048205574,0.0012840158,0.0013084885,0.0038965049,0.00059049483,0.0011463048,0.00791079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029921213,0.00016332744,0.00042683847,0.0012949087,0.003582855,0.0024795649,0.002208682,0.0016429754,0.00045817072],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066642696,0.0004654884,0.7644254,0.00028729675,0.00021605521,0.0009778085,0.08029075,0.00081377337,0.0014168536,0.099986464,0.0013783327,0.04907539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014602856,0.0002560973,0.7052907,0.00036024622,0.00018254893,0.0003195942,0.19837402,0.0050185854,0.0014410317,0.07599375,0.012554394,0.000063047584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037305027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034047621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010347399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014436357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011241345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054722905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380632074","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2223233","title":"Regional involvement in EU trade policy: what remains after politicization?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Institutionalisation; Regional policy; German; Political science; Medium term; Regional trade; Political economy; Regional integration; Regional development; European union; International trade; Economics; Free trade; Sociology; Regional science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.05582667606630088,"score_gpt":0.3298904232543197,"score_spread":0.27406374718801885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380632074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7676878,0.005671803,0.0069973627,0.021931052,0.00010269622,0.00002733346,0.00007158174,0.000024115092,0.19748633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735,0.00040965772,0.00016231638,0.00027975475,0.000016005071,0.0000040759583,0.000014136365,0.000004426559,0.0017595912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965965,0.0014706913,0.000107458094,0.00038771098,0.00023879575,0.001198732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968886,0.0014282204,0.0006894472,0.00021997602,0.00030012694,0.00047348673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042349505,0.00016467244,0.00033736392,0.0006039468,0.0014973319,0.0047647255,0.0006139644,0.0019302838,0.004349246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005360725,0.00013281353,0.00041513727,0.001356779,0.0029794842,0.0042160363,0.0028075778,0.0016465458,0.0003640016],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003231291,0.00019135255,0.06427864,0.00038508096,0.00012231505,0.0018229887,0.020422796,0.008095233,0.0012178168,0.8347339,0.0032736799,0.065133125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086863576,0.00041253315,0.31499147,0.0019482384,0.00028549458,0.0012663242,0.081257805,0.0136577,0.004169241,0.29023096,0.29155558,0.00013777915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063334997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007136553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063334997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032638563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018613046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023681104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381888607","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2217849","title":"Missed opportunities: the impact of internal compartmentalisation on EU diplomacy across the international regime complex on climate change","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Climate Change Policy and Economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS","keywords":"Diplomacy; Negotiation; Climate change; Political science; Corporate governance; International regime; Climate governance; Multi-level governance; International trade; International law; International relations; Political economy; European union; Economics; Law; Politics; Ecology","score_opus":0.4793620449045697,"score_gpt":0.3859190687091394,"score_spread":0.0934429761954303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381888607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6927623,0.0011867236,0.013872289,0.020793095,0.0003070779,0.00010641379,0.000098493285,0.00008550017,0.2707882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977043,0.000073146475,0.00041673754,0.00042846947,0.000017715518,0.000018574363,0.0000122855945,0.000018555098,0.0013102384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98106384,0.010754586,0.0007550328,0.0014526926,0.002000987,0.003972872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604338,0.026216319,0.0047809947,0.0034060965,0.001918782,0.0032441125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021480536,0.00039495458,0.00066520576,0.0016634293,0.008012691,0.018907592,0.0013176284,0.002736488,0.009977237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0551854,0.00042784837,0.0007194531,0.0017245887,0.014031063,0.014837697,0.02112534,0.0069804345,0.00053899956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003898585,0.00015625944,0.018950349,0.00016538461,0.00008753815,0.0016260403,0.062333662,0.0037765377,0.0009136298,0.8680097,0.0037130027,0.039878074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022714083,0.00036855764,0.042843845,0.0014337954,0.00016809552,0.0011568312,0.1588412,0.009184762,0.0039334847,0.6128854,0.16874313,0.00021388862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051160026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005177244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021480536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008071278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057359654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11360127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386769390","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2240374","title":"The Commissioner vs the states: responsiveness and responsibility in European tax governance","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Politics; Public administration; Parliament; Unanimity; European union; Veto; Corporate governance; Law; Political economy; Economics; Economic policy; Management","score_opus":0.03650619783618343,"score_gpt":0.3302631283353188,"score_spread":0.29375693049913537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386769390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26107228,0.004588573,0.031873737,0.12346692,0.0007076179,0.00009496859,0.000048230937,0.00009227682,0.5780554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99233514,0.00042725223,0.0005758534,0.0024720354,0.00006717086,0.000027933345,0.000006756886,0.000023141132,0.004064646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97154677,0.020333542,0.0007249185,0.0016930463,0.0031489686,0.0025527768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889769,0.0073897084,0.0011591474,0.0007636643,0.0007983382,0.0009121778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022426704,0.000254297,0.0004365805,0.0020920238,0.005413766,0.017690757,0.0007481549,0.004899495,0.0027273914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02635385,0.00028995314,0.0005524102,0.0024945259,0.030232763,0.010949373,0.008203298,0.0054087876,0.00023031823],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011668589,0.0000084025105,0.00074320106,0.000011539258,0.0000072351313,0.000051897478,0.010643661,0.00061350095,0.00005369906,0.9835385,0.0010950546,0.0032215228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036243757,0.00005008913,0.006731933,0.0003629746,0.000026041522,0.000107604756,0.028583135,0.0020662262,0.00049479544,0.82194495,0.13951491,0.000081144586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009030216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005908164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022426704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011950812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009214387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1186052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387638938","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2268673","title":"Timely climate proposals. Discourse networks and (dis)continuity in European policies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Political science; European union; Climate change; Discourse analysis; Climate policy; Political economy; Public administration; Sociology; Business; International trade; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03227335724735984,"score_gpt":0.34775797345346626,"score_spread":0.3154846162061064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387638938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8346662,0.0030766383,0.01578828,0.017562967,0.00014845004,0.00012663273,0.00191862,0.00011557982,0.12659664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959447,0.00032476065,0.001435703,0.0001545982,0.000030559906,0.000057076548,0.0004061241,0.0000251874,0.0016214481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99145025,0.0055542774,0.0005741546,0.001052813,0.0008810099,0.00048749414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92620915,0.0539581,0.012005987,0.003347789,0.0029124676,0.0015665323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013950174,0.00029455387,0.00026612624,0.004836848,0.0027270024,0.0072525563,0.0008097729,0.001814798,0.007754554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070526004,0.00028265105,0.0002240119,0.005485543,0.00390001,0.013375075,0.0045101116,0.0013813226,0.000698658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005495892,0.00017749342,0.13755347,0.0006752943,0.00007549249,0.00050619576,0.2557164,0.0038779036,0.0015154412,0.44936562,0.008657549,0.14132965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008728728,0.000107950094,0.18378633,0.001084621,0.000069454305,0.0002812685,0.23654062,0.010618258,0.0020950285,0.2954253,0.26979062,0.00011332542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060216235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00461469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013950174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054881214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020554378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073776424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388865634","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2282735","title":"Minding the time gap: politicians’ perspectives on inter-temporal trade-offs in policy and politics","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Politics; Perception; Public policy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Investment (military); Public opinion; Public economics; Political economy; Economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.0736170175690532,"score_gpt":0.36809848110094356,"score_spread":0.29448146353189036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388865634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8595992,0.004346306,0.0053818813,0.05151035,0.00046061398,0.000024250217,0.000049999104,0.000016367869,0.07861119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979305,0.00035082587,0.00016874517,0.00091671216,0.000058219084,0.000006388468,0.000008064929,0.0000071888744,0.00055337785],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861026,0.01030671,0.00031199542,0.0006219765,0.00097324577,0.0016834826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775393,0.015476137,0.0030468465,0.00059659703,0.001059319,0.0022818425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019353705,0.00029557588,0.000517433,0.0024422249,0.0075420956,0.012873984,0.00076533534,0.0036318328,0.002970075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022683026,0.00036816084,0.0006078934,0.0021827798,0.019546686,0.011366434,0.0062568616,0.0066450243,0.00022837598],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019851682,0.00008096527,0.025153147,0.00013077063,0.00004625359,0.0006584706,0.79352045,0.00042097934,0.0006389034,0.1636543,0.0020903565,0.013406821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023139411,0.00007541005,0.02057345,0.00027346463,0.000022868457,0.00033809154,0.87890965,0.00074243866,0.0001932599,0.06375733,0.035042167,0.00004873298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004244726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005257916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019353705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045991936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029046657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102353394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390115384","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2023.2294144","title":"Digital sovereignty, economic ideas, and the struggle over the digital markets act: a political-cultural approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Science Research Council","keywords":"Sovereignty; Geopolitics; Politics; Context (archaeology); Corporate governance; Political economy; Digital economy; Economics; Economic system; Political science; Market economy; Sociology; Law; Management","score_opus":0.02728905821125397,"score_gpt":0.2393895363418772,"score_spread":0.21210047813062324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390115384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11536246,0.020117888,0.036156565,0.17503193,0.0007579742,0.00008000289,0.00007497328,0.00002562245,0.6523926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98153174,0.004061036,0.0025779014,0.0039466023,0.00044609283,0.000073954776,0.00001458563,0.000017974506,0.007330001],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966355,0.0022694133,0.00008501608,0.00025717256,0.00040764504,0.00034525554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583983,0.003084829,0.0003116708,0.00027206895,0.00023433019,0.00025734957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057845446,0.00042806863,0.00035439714,0.0026313388,0.0051258854,0.014337133,0.0010384936,0.0047676796,0.0027235951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050004288,0.00027659425,0.0003356964,0.0018562963,0.058476835,0.008865664,0.0053418344,0.00555503,0.00015014704],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017166175,0.000005566723,0.000086240514,0.0000066749467,0.0000012090935,0.000021199852,0.002117271,0.00009756229,0.00001907813,0.9963953,0.00020790278,0.0010402855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011210008,0.000013486834,0.00064684503,0.00018401182,0.000005966425,0.00007532065,0.009565158,0.0007577285,0.00016191496,0.9256254,0.06293905,0.00001394463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032643713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025810846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014337133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007033509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032995937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051031947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392983872","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2024.2325647","title":"Hybrid organisations and governance systems: the case of the European Space Agency","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Space exploration and regulation","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; École Nationale d'Administration Publique","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Corporate governance; Agency (philosophy); Multi-level governance; Space (punctuation); Public administration; European union; Business; Political science; Economic system; Economics; Sociology; International trade; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.016335119779801694,"score_gpt":0.24782909497623082,"score_spread":0.2314939751964291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392983872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66840065,0.0033046568,0.009297588,0.024790216,0.00010316091,0.000052672705,0.000044670272,0.000040349343,0.29396594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941328,0.00026315238,0.0006270496,0.00035040305,0.0000142604795,0.000015456666,0.0000074371324,0.000005986719,0.0045834426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923815,0.00519558,0.00016059437,0.00043285784,0.0005006459,0.0013287263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655414,0.0018982274,0.00041058662,0.00032449176,0.0002807977,0.0005317345],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00547683,0.00021933892,0.00028102484,0.0012314375,0.010630833,0.011905779,0.00096939114,0.0050225845,0.003483772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005954963,0.000254751,0.0004951584,0.0020648118,0.016829703,0.0075240643,0.0062986882,0.0026889595,0.0002824883],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030401272,0.000033850734,0.0029992932,0.000018958646,0.000014847867,0.0012514015,0.020697186,0.0015437087,0.0000987649,0.9669055,0.0015611781,0.0048449137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013441785,0.00014248924,0.018592829,0.00029584466,0.00005954741,0.0022201736,0.12828085,0.009412402,0.0005112166,0.48268107,0.3575502,0.00011888143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034982264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024942288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98936915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008695311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003203666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06955731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399515604","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2024.2362762","title":"The polycrisis and EU security and defence competences","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Veto; Argument (complex analysis); Sovereignty; Member states; Political economy; Political science; Brexit; Empowerment; European union; International trade; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.017459513196674735,"score_gpt":0.30018874074533713,"score_spread":0.2827292275486624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399515604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7265057,0.0036670265,0.004160952,0.018328363,0.000109768764,0.000047415582,0.00008453088,0.000018663366,0.24707758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971282,0.0003343882,0.00017210597,0.00028024975,0.000013570558,0.000007936044,0.00001002163,0.0000024861827,0.0020511483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676347,0.0013549175,0.00017948892,0.00043813314,0.0003800192,0.0008839069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588865,0.0011783243,0.001192018,0.00022781335,0.00040848658,0.0011045991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004479617,0.00026000192,0.00035172683,0.0017183193,0.0034476472,0.006996881,0.00046183096,0.0013126114,0.0072999718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052264137,0.00023230778,0.00027790057,0.0015349962,0.013807591,0.0057171183,0.010979479,0.002981152,0.0004339377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010049985,0.00012237941,0.012644599,0.000116050396,0.000034998848,0.0007102606,0.015291402,0.001843885,0.0006658252,0.9475988,0.0015661771,0.019305201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015773563,0.00032937236,0.1346436,0.0013657867,0.000055931814,0.0014989622,0.10682716,0.0061548064,0.0015668337,0.579115,0.16816345,0.00012134746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006033462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008176985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072999718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060725124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038548417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044059336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408281169","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2025.2475007","title":"Embedded liberalism, economic nationalism, or Welfare Chauvinism? Experimental evidence on policy preferences in tough times","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca; Università degli Studi di Trento; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Chauvinism; Nationalism; Liberalism; Economics; Welfare; Political economy; Political science; Welfare state; Positive economics; Economic nationalism; Sociology; Economic system; Law; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.07358159562844324,"score_gpt":0.4027806806003577,"score_spread":0.32919908497191447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408281169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908538,0.00006307277,0.00038080392,0.00041412388,0.000006696025,0.0000118559055,0.000020732808,0.0000018990463,0.008247104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999416,0.000056796383,0.00013069119,0.00009462225,0.000004301983,0.000012363195,0.00001379226,0.0000015516025,0.00026989888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965294,0.0026602005,0.00010571721,0.00021838139,0.000257116,0.00022920225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97740436,0.014294996,0.0055403668,0.0017337117,0.0003370133,0.0006896712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069823884,0.00018099512,0.0002954564,0.0004993363,0.0007041435,0.0018104136,0.0003180429,0.00093931984,0.0068193804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01757844,0.00016184106,0.00014731457,0.0006995421,0.0032674833,0.0015864711,0.0011865721,0.0009629339,0.0003351884],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016969059,0.009545621,0.41175452,0.001500347,0.0005619732,0.00069403,0.08305374,0.0066786245,0.027371349,0.25777686,0.0036008449,0.18049312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011351584,0.0045900904,0.7787235,0.000357159,0.00020608734,0.00026051386,0.08603036,0.008311215,0.0073092054,0.09042481,0.022477632,0.00017423679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001014067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013489653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069823884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061122817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003084698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036926806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410805884","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2025.2509755","title":"Breaking the stalemate: Europeans' preferences to expand, cut, or sustain support to Ukraine","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS; McGill University","keywords":"Stalemate; Political science; Economics; Development economics; Political economy; Economic system; International trade; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.041759525679433036,"score_gpt":0.3588021259066727,"score_spread":0.3170426002272397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410805884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959461,0.000102695514,0.00006694204,0.0006434248,0.000007880185,0.0000014895371,0.000013310633,7.7711456e-7,0.0032174955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994967,0.000050579703,0.000018372819,0.00020011453,0.0000039966667,7.8893737e-7,0.000013743241,7.5165644e-7,0.00021477183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987924,0.0006177944,0.00006986059,0.00007488389,0.00014806223,0.00029687112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752146,0.00089545874,0.00075247145,0.00011193582,0.00029654225,0.00042208374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003295998,0.00009152411,0.00019720533,0.00042357252,0.0010994058,0.0029115595,0.00017190233,0.0006610993,0.0015151225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005827784,0.000078422934,0.00016110862,0.0005922551,0.0016661176,0.0012030882,0.0012460207,0.0008346229,0.00014954737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007136181,0.00018300071,0.74543273,0.00011041918,0.00016971216,0.0011331633,0.1783424,0.00068396947,0.0021305443,0.018411124,0.0032969639,0.049392346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003151597,0.00020639539,0.5653455,0.00014170582,0.000037439495,0.0005011719,0.4127803,0.0006671576,0.0005498675,0.0028932285,0.016802596,0.00004309568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004329413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005304586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004329413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00067650917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042021414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01743114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411136122","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2026.2655936","title":"Democratic Frontsliding in the European Union: The Problem of Autocratic Enclaves and the Case for Restorative Disobedience","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Autocracy; Democracy; European union; Political science; Civil disobedience; Restorative justice; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics; International trade; Politics","score_opus":0.04653912726548738,"score_gpt":0.33881227917864765,"score_spread":0.2922731519131603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411136122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57668,0.005058454,0.030376611,0.0684763,0.00036380597,0.000106076666,0.000035357254,0.00010406832,0.31879923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923603,0.0003648804,0.0013210418,0.0015714398,0.000024140742,0.00003378854,0.000005396436,0.000018713177,0.00430022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98917866,0.0058768243,0.00033568667,0.001235526,0.0009934625,0.002379854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472106,0.002197829,0.0009824206,0.0012121341,0.00040887902,0.0004776568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012079934,0.00039783536,0.000647134,0.0013272478,0.012185485,0.012397006,0.0013361743,0.0072178883,0.0025310607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015246316,0.0003798956,0.0006719409,0.0013551319,0.04669935,0.010573666,0.011129704,0.0063544232,0.000261746],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016044127,0.00002205674,0.0008124768,0.000025229787,0.000007166364,0.00018580911,0.0060971226,0.00058808754,0.000066331806,0.9849915,0.0008725279,0.006315799],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040811723,0.00003610274,0.002594125,0.00024677065,0.000013059444,0.00015698625,0.009764725,0.0015546331,0.0005442863,0.9275583,0.057454713,0.000035389898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009055208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008425155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012397006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063283457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047814967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06388557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414111723","doi":"10.1080/13501763.2025.2554903","title":"Rage against the machine? Generative AI exposure, subjective risk, and policy preferences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Public Policy","topic":"Ethics and Social Impacts of AI","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Staatssekretariat für Bildung, Forschung und Innovation; Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Rage (emotion); Generative grammar; Public policy; Context (archaeology); Generative model","score_opus":0.03655239353059956,"score_gpt":0.35965829104594327,"score_spread":0.3231058975153437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414111723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98759127,0.00008513226,0.0006442965,0.0014468089,0.000010255615,0.000010705064,0.000016038863,0.0000039877464,0.01019151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926764,0.000035039237,0.000073321346,0.00013960253,0.0000053289664,0.0000050822778,0.0000070378583,0.0000017316597,0.00046521556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966624,0.0021937487,0.000119810655,0.00024876653,0.00039514163,0.00038021934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813502,0.012746728,0.003079466,0.0010637922,0.00052374543,0.0012360563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005436771,0.00015203709,0.00021335878,0.00051509356,0.001171294,0.004585052,0.0002698252,0.0012892134,0.005743776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021580258,0.00018359472,0.00023340696,0.00033228638,0.003193685,0.0018486424,0.0015835906,0.0017313954,0.00049170427],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010031875,0.0022370578,0.6839114,0.00017205616,0.0002552714,0.00067743514,0.1746158,0.0024666002,0.004824323,0.052095313,0.0025747837,0.07516685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108908454,0.0010738539,0.7348476,0.00023411805,0.00012668336,0.00047434756,0.16439153,0.006000276,0.0022663784,0.06771195,0.022625832,0.00013850111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014225201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015308246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005743776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007644133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042631922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028752804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}