{"meta":{"query_hash":"806523f271be","filters":{"venue":"Journal of European Social Policy"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/806523f271be","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+European+Social+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W2046330977","doi":"10.1177/0958928711418852","title":"The effect of integration and social democratic welfare states on immigrants’ educational attainment: a multilevel estimate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Welfare state; Argument (complex analysis); Welfare; Democracy; Multilevel model; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Inequality; European Social Survey; Social integration; Sociology; Social stratification; Politics; Economics; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.021089361883686344,"score_gpt":0.32792145558905256,"score_spread":0.30683209370536624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046330977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9742756,0.00008357139,0.00017420406,0.008390554,0.00026779875,0.0002447608,0.000018807292,0.0000118565495,0.016532874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969724,0.00011076008,0.00010416642,0.00011696417,0.0021837377,0.0000029693342,0.000006466883,0.000015629412,0.000486901],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768364,0.0010947819,0.0005065184,0.000098086464,0.00041646132,0.00020049022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871665,0.00020056771,0.00067510176,0.00005618373,0.00028277616,0.00006869787],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016797564,0.00013679234,0.00021317837,0.00013283944,0.0013938244,0.000086623986,0.00021816991,0.00005318448,0.000040172083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075639336,0.00008632463,0.00014446658,0.0001572934,0.00038026992,0.00026354662,0.000018374907,0.00019765316,0.000007999104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007826676,0.0002599269,0.003269274,0.000065814485,0.00021146583,0.0000049593727,0.43210736,0.0000052118385,0.0014575074,0.3329919,0.0186705,0.21017343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032677827,0.0032257128,0.8807483,0.00027075125,0.00032991785,0.000016275699,0.03898809,0.00026971035,0.0032840283,0.028671732,0.040251505,0.00067621603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001024561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075932784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.877479,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013348169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017461296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122827996","doi":"10.1177/0958928712449776","title":"Convergent care regimes? Childcare arrangements in Australia, Canada, Finland and Sweden","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Politics; Diversity (politics); Political science; Investment (military); Political economy; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.04888706098779951,"score_gpt":0.3537375339511574,"score_spread":0.30485047296335793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122827996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9014431,0.0009544627,3.7185896e-7,0.007487957,0.0007104447,0.00012207718,0.000020521193,0.000005770564,0.089255296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97979003,0.00049527874,0.000009790017,0.00060795015,0.016464593,6.65847e-7,9.437291e-7,0.000013524401,0.0026172476],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982923,0.00041285093,0.00033800403,0.00007602987,0.00040100372,0.00047980662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926615,0.000031242027,0.00029519873,0.000046863097,0.0001272584,0.00023326062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060493074,0.0001202948,0.00025163146,0.00011401499,0.0005245188,0.000036050435,0.00018707622,0.000056095952,0.00002204239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024396871,0.00010151269,0.000085327796,0.00024841013,0.0002187029,0.00021063404,0.00006439507,0.00023267338,0.000008683413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006435402,0.00010132563,0.22435153,0.00007191514,0.00023811359,0.000076173645,0.6582695,0.0000017465838,0.000032664735,0.011862081,0.0925975,0.012333057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067488826,0.000031848173,0.7834331,0.00003943453,0.000032035845,0.000003922951,0.06266075,2.599917e-8,0.000009758456,0.0003370751,0.15260531,0.00017185345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45270288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2505443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5956088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004151548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043047752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7631313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147244892","doi":"10.1177/0958928704046879","title":"Mechanisms of poverty alleviation: anti-poverty effects of non-means-tested and means-tested benefits in five welfare states","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Welfare; Public economics; Social protection; Development economics; Social assistance; Welfare state; Social Welfare; Social policy; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.013454083260715352,"score_gpt":0.288081392532543,"score_spread":0.27462730927182766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147244892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95937955,0.00053283275,0.00017890435,0.022070926,0.00049940386,0.0005522226,0.00007888755,0.000034162502,0.016673088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562144,0.0017165929,0.00018267965,0.0007557274,0.0015828614,0.0000011949373,0.0000027455633,0.000031050084,0.0001057195],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974308,0.0005027795,0.0008382584,0.00016741987,0.00063902064,0.00042172405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980279,0.00019295068,0.0010622704,0.00009350035,0.0004657894,0.00015758396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010054694,0.00022156256,0.0007059328,0.0003315501,0.0005095957,0.000036706835,0.0003275886,0.00013879559,0.0000055732708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011219298,0.00018111398,0.00024112455,0.0008499157,0.00040352612,0.00035152416,0.000110224406,0.00029210016,0.0000023843395],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004889056,0.0016782229,0.0057891705,0.0010074591,0.0012647391,0.00024067627,0.50403047,0.0011091128,0.007819332,0.44777954,0.0036385974,0.025153771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008624192,0.00139135,0.8858002,0.0011206259,0.00027511467,0.000015967766,0.038277443,0.000019109702,0.0029371819,0.05914955,0.0016179987,0.00077130966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004410482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008670605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88001096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002074262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003276684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73856133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162164252","doi":"10.1177/0958928707084449","title":"Decommodification and activation in social democratic policy: resolving the paradox","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Unemployment; Welfare state; Democracy; Social policy; Payroll; Social security; Welfare; Labour economics; Social Welfare; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.07374187511969253,"score_gpt":0.36587300490174895,"score_spread":0.2921311297820564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162164252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77660793,0.00009853473,0.000041777803,0.13338742,0.0001300955,0.00018433826,0.0000022090455,0.000024008361,0.089523666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739379,0.00072585494,0.000028155855,0.0012615266,0.023541544,0.0000016621567,4.5802844e-7,0.000017128732,0.0004857339],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762106,0.0010661759,0.00047906247,0.000097356475,0.00039583215,0.00034053763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990141,0.00018279123,0.0005216867,0.00005607873,0.00014937599,0.00007600759],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015205565,0.00011693226,0.00024188518,0.0002772544,0.0031702793,0.00006322502,0.00027908478,0.00007959638,0.0000021524518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014825728,0.00008559973,0.00012360427,0.00080661767,0.0008062072,0.00033285056,0.000065322034,0.00035692094,0.000004894584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012550298,0.00018344476,0.005966324,0.000022194996,0.00012820285,0.000026037142,0.6507291,0.0000071951777,0.000714367,0.264422,0.030431665,0.04724394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010248793,0.000071746086,0.8955344,0.000040503426,0.00002920488,0.000018408864,0.026146602,0.0000056366594,0.000039102804,0.05756594,0.019261075,0.00026250049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023153666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026341577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8895681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028575104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051043555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99812746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162354131","doi":"10.1177/0958928712449774","title":"All in the family? Migrants, nationhood, and care regimes in Asia and North America","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; International Labour Organization","keywords":"Work (physics); Mediterranean climate; Care work; Demographic economics; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Gender studies; Development economics; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.056210372281010564,"score_gpt":0.34880460642312533,"score_spread":0.2925942341421148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162354131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89176327,0.0027347037,5.002608e-7,0.017444221,0.000107776155,0.0001027831,0.000005640009,0.000005749639,0.087835334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875619,0.004130668,0.000017460483,0.0015875591,0.006618363,8.783458e-7,5.8126733e-7,0.000008893154,0.00007372025],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983619,0.000725544,0.0002693596,0.000062377716,0.00026949143,0.00031134376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995113,0.00008818525,0.00021768128,0.000036763176,0.00006548361,0.00008055849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084427994,0.00008887248,0.00018882878,0.00013896024,0.00040673185,0.000052173073,0.00017376628,0.000039821203,7.9537875e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037185336,0.000060104157,0.0000579286,0.00042480434,0.00042858443,0.00025774082,0.000045906967,0.000247815,0.0000026709974],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016004593,0.000053506756,0.034051552,0.000010798774,0.000028159042,0.0000133291105,0.9249285,4.7809596e-7,0.0000069540097,0.007547518,0.0046678856,0.028675338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028079606,0.000023471877,0.70902914,0.000011438827,0.00001124746,0.000002699617,0.20913583,1.1298468e-7,2.394822e-7,0.00037669807,0.0810616,0.00006669053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004462947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019150288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71579266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007547375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009323934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6746671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2701172916","doi":"10.1177/0958928717700563","title":"Federalism, policy change, and social security in Belgium: Explaining the decentralization of family allowances in the Sixth State Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Decentralization; Veto; Federalism; Politics; Social security; Political science; State (computer science); French; Clientelism; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Sociology; Democracy; Law; Humanities","score_opus":0.11314143582832145,"score_gpt":0.393101392476008,"score_spread":0.2799599566476866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2701172916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8483455,0.00022615818,0.0000013622382,0.09631294,0.00019811619,0.00023515068,0.00001604041,0.0000073339243,0.054657403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835208,0.003265695,0.0000053282674,0.0020211847,0.011102487,0.0000032255452,7.5601577e-7,0.000015417247,0.00006512599],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99721277,0.001098731,0.0005753129,0.000112429516,0.00053613406,0.00046464286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985532,0.00009257361,0.0010421363,0.000104808765,0.00015487273,0.000052418553],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032582525,0.00014995388,0.00035058576,0.00019922896,0.0028745383,0.00025511775,0.0007650897,0.00007628893,0.0000010371341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006421114,0.00009053496,0.00014241351,0.0003814033,0.001163129,0.00058007025,0.00015608147,0.00038384888,8.966163e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075013115,0.00007754143,0.005862194,0.00002480372,0.000048096113,0.000019620677,0.8764014,8.751955e-7,0.00003408868,0.10345782,0.00088289345,0.013115602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000983547,0.00007292989,0.82434654,0.00006849945,0.000020154135,0.0000029983983,0.1368521,0.000002134522,0.000008573847,0.026144912,0.01133252,0.00016509854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039931472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015307468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81848437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025252978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032634134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785792178","doi":"10.1177/0958928717700564","title":"The case for welfare state universalism, or the lasting relevance of the paradox of redistribution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Operationalization; Redistribution (election); Redistribution of income and wealth; Welfare state; Argument (complex analysis); Positive economics; Poverty; Economics; Politics; Welfare; Public economics; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Public good; Law; Market economy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04331353503707856,"score_gpt":0.3564143436480617,"score_spread":0.3131008086109831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785792178","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6250797,0.00032630513,0.0002626756,0.29727143,0.002672373,0.0009866431,0.00041800615,0.00003598392,0.0729469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98990095,0.00020402175,0.000014270812,0.00015534471,0.008955254,6.6463366e-7,1.9324067e-7,0.000011263124,0.0007580364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982051,0.0007201971,0.00045206933,0.0000617804,0.00029164707,0.00026919838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975448,0.0004733676,0.0011471475,0.00010206442,0.0006892637,0.000043305026],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020367345,0.00008407844,0.00018194105,0.000029870554,0.0037610943,0.000034249966,0.00049221853,0.000036442878,0.0000018487027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037000254,0.000033357286,0.00023518287,0.00049463654,0.0020818422,0.000110235516,0.00009963597,0.0001756495,6.771365e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009974682,0.00011440169,0.00017454597,0.00007207527,0.0005202553,0.00006769276,0.2997028,0.00000965827,0.0003965545,0.57781917,0.04499053,0.07513487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017701703,0.0006801526,0.01450349,0.0001729192,0.00025948536,0.00009758045,0.21924706,0.000015662778,0.00080435124,0.046779152,0.71538484,0.00028515083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010971476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013440677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6703943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010891826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033663132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806491966","doi":"10.1177/0958928718768337","title":"The migrant in the market: Care penalties and immigration in eight liberal welfare regimes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Immigration; Wage; Care work; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Economics; Health care; Welfare state; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.02923861771700855,"score_gpt":0.3742886515606977,"score_spread":0.34505003384368915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806491966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7868626,0.0014812066,7.244169e-7,0.14477073,0.00026645383,0.00022900476,0.0000062022723,0.000005947343,0.06637714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896836,0.0006818423,0.000006908528,0.0014898885,0.006297731,0.0000038679427,9.4961547e-7,0.000015960006,0.0018192095],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971965,0.0017301874,0.00051040977,0.00007554131,0.00020692639,0.00028044233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991578,0.00019544292,0.00034750928,0.00008509769,0.00018379763,0.00003034931],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001467062,0.000104615,0.0001769992,0.00012655392,0.0015501081,0.000032772008,0.00022518377,0.00003974847,0.000018100574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021536484,0.00005362248,0.0000662897,0.00021962624,0.00020549736,0.00011734406,0.00008765375,0.00046758467,0.000008702669],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041812685,0.000044339202,0.11430017,0.000078259516,0.00005485166,0.000049288526,0.6129068,1.1112225e-7,0.000034823915,0.011586868,0.23993807,0.020588305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051166496,0.000094471594,0.64826936,0.00007958562,0.000009092249,0.000002911719,0.063678674,5.1062824e-7,0.0000010559756,0.0004175292,0.28688496,0.000050199535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072747027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003900529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54922813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106783235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008799858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900705452","doi":"10.1177/0958928718807404","title":"Promoting policy consistency and continuity in the EU through the trio: Alcohol-related harm on the council presidency agenda","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Consistency (knowledge bases); Public administration; European union; Political science; Club; Law; Economics; Medicine; Politics; Economic policy","score_opus":0.1286216213090674,"score_gpt":0.3728939072967299,"score_spread":0.24427228598766249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900705452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36024764,0.00020136259,0.0000031391533,0.1664857,0.00014602,0.0003181164,0.0000071931804,0.000020079087,0.47257075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789965,0.0002212099,0.0000064264823,0.010866962,0.00883092,0.0000021236986,2.1302891e-7,0.00002490161,0.0010507058],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930955,0.004532283,0.0006570514,0.00016940113,0.0009839437,0.0005618038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807847,0.0008126209,0.00046449076,0.00018583176,0.0003746951,0.000083902996],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009912796,0.00018801149,0.00027617734,0.0000937014,0.002406917,0.00034227784,0.00091900065,0.00007988289,0.00005137374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00610902,0.0000974638,0.00020627122,0.0008965928,0.0016828531,0.00027509636,0.000067103945,0.00096493383,0.000036477104],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049369104,0.000072261384,0.0003394844,0.0000065556783,0.00006880913,0.000031553664,0.80798846,8.2481114e-7,0.00017157212,0.1725776,0.010921232,0.0077722794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019278495,0.0004880637,0.16867587,0.00018994974,0.00012228177,0.00008136553,0.05151487,0.000007869661,0.000047599315,0.018570932,0.75802404,0.00034929859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012409717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001522351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7564736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003610409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022924014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979797233","doi":"10.1177/0958928720963324","title":"Reducing mommy penalties with daddy quotas","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Difference in differences; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Significant difference; Percentage point; Economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0443435289234627,"score_gpt":0.3097906158552715,"score_spread":0.2654470869318088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979797233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6624658,0.00018076868,0.00032117017,0.032935016,0.00029937093,0.00010838785,0.000013869046,0.000054850127,0.30362076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781895,0.00019828495,0.00046494242,0.0030124898,0.017311938,2.1406076e-7,0.0000010264584,0.000034819375,0.000786759],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806464,0.00054569024,0.00037701978,0.00012490037,0.0005423501,0.00034537603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884397,0.000039456212,0.0004432372,0.00006983256,0.0002943121,0.00030917994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007691294,0.00012920357,0.00025426206,0.00009954426,0.0006371444,0.00016117143,0.00044841875,0.00004459739,0.000031187898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041191233,0.000108752516,0.00014025616,0.0005329242,0.00029411458,0.00028287416,0.000056794855,0.00035972268,0.000038548213],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025838564,0.00019157847,0.011309197,0.00006134679,0.0003406617,0.00044416744,0.78041434,0.0003065681,0.0014858089,0.077122055,0.11501904,0.013046869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026299804,0.0010139297,0.17713106,0.00012105416,0.00022623305,0.00004983891,0.26560485,0.0000521245,0.000039532602,0.0018251553,0.5504373,0.00086898473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006613167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000059775222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5148095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121539226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007216851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49004638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998302662","doi":"10.1177/0958928719891339","title":"Time and well-being, an institutional, comparative perspective: Is it time to explore the idea of a time policy?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Time perspective; Well-being; Welfare; Perspective (graphical); European Social Survey; Social policy; Positive economics; Public economics; Time-use survey; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Space time","score_opus":0.05769488705693784,"score_gpt":0.3929239873847438,"score_spread":0.335229100327806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998302662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55823606,0.00003891694,0.000008246639,0.011994418,0.000092097485,0.000137316,0.000012694605,0.000013966221,0.42946628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96978474,0.00001768289,0.000046211226,0.005851503,0.00439327,0.0000013427027,0.0000031236605,0.000028261433,0.019873893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977422,0.00088130694,0.00052061654,0.0002493112,0.00031673088,0.00028988562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987144,0.00011435743,0.00049623434,0.00022110566,0.00026273448,0.00019119353],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007683944,0.00020236058,0.00043356267,0.00031344884,0.0002281664,0.000050976312,0.0003657106,0.00008632221,0.0031522778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012655686,0.00014645296,0.00018225673,0.00043497633,0.00034209448,0.00019295467,0.000079760226,0.000412518,0.0086080525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015571081,0.0008547254,0.0009119225,0.000016682501,0.00094482454,0.00007327318,0.3663396,0.00013782008,0.017727379,0.053007483,0.5530707,0.0053584543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053636376,0.004997267,0.54176784,0.00023490666,0.00022968973,0.0006817922,0.023353675,0.0001281529,0.00026165688,0.010897454,0.41104546,0.0010384747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030850858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001197312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5408559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014375868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011905631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101396588","doi":"10.1177/0958928720954685","title":"The public face of interest group lobbying on immigration: Who responds to and who ignores what they say","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Credibility; Public opinion; Immigration policy; Public policy; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Interest group; Demographic economics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Politics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.068056253370828,"score_gpt":0.33610336122721474,"score_spread":0.26804710785638675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3101396588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69267535,0.00021654733,0.000051512263,0.29276654,0.00020721905,0.000115397655,0.000009833773,0.000010079014,0.013947553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871192,0.001003805,0.000013503104,0.0071826074,0.004117714,4.0042775e-7,4.1691735e-7,0.000014498897,0.0005478687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982651,0.0007431561,0.0003563033,0.00009627899,0.00032191025,0.00021726819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903387,0.0001362726,0.00034284932,0.000073061994,0.00019237761,0.00022154684],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012285826,0.000089319714,0.00017092495,0.00009445711,0.00077533803,0.00058095704,0.0004147593,0.000029524912,0.000013920669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088308484,0.00005995487,0.00009453075,0.000372119,0.00016945993,0.0005146857,0.000109000954,0.00019670794,0.0000034631141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012918883,0.000046536297,0.00031497623,0.000004123593,0.00006954678,0.000012128301,0.11782274,0.0000027926167,0.0010661533,0.7681495,0.027700908,0.084681414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040216467,0.0005043804,0.06391571,0.00009511583,0.00001708576,0.0000011057575,0.057625853,0.0000027385418,0.00005310789,0.001390405,0.87586474,0.00012759824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030717056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017310086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84816384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006375634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013182338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5963352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134410751","doi":"10.1177/0958928721996651","title":"Taking subnational and regional welfare states seriously: Insights from the Quebec case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare state; Economics; Political science; State (computer science); Public economics; Development economics; Politics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.043064257523419636,"score_gpt":0.33388467356384205,"score_spread":0.2908204160404224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134410751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7513101,0.0013136216,0.000007945772,0.21673398,0.00035465325,0.00006727259,0.000034260724,0.00002048343,0.03015767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708687,0.00089284766,0.000041445925,0.0032978992,0.02409201,5.2526065e-7,0.0000046774117,0.000016833867,0.0007850516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794024,0.00093515345,0.00034616448,0.000113121554,0.0004365994,0.00022874851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986394,0.0002569315,0.0004897922,0.0000588383,0.0004402272,0.000114812174],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048567491,0.000114916555,0.00020787786,0.00006084452,0.0028135995,0.0001964525,0.00018564385,0.000058474667,0.000035730278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086699624,0.000078192716,0.0001553444,0.00034970694,0.00064599776,0.00025569656,0.00010691389,0.00028365527,0.000005326127],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052512976,0.00010404659,0.0013501758,0.00001078708,0.00048014,0.0033272998,0.45519996,0.000007378141,0.00011791678,0.47461385,0.028012788,0.036723167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009878363,0.000041499443,0.25963873,0.000057757614,0.00010929175,0.0004228905,0.23025425,0.0000026435746,0.000016886717,0.040706985,0.4674386,0.0003226187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046328314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049615614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43942583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014364562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057726493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239997264","doi":"10.1177/0958928720918973","title":"Targeting within universalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Universalism; Political science; Welfare; Population; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05382739620325934,"score_gpt":0.336557945324404,"score_spread":0.28273054912114465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239997264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.098494105,0.00024033006,0.000118383745,0.29415408,0.0009621645,0.00015551779,0.0000122214915,0.00011754329,0.6057457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92279536,0.00029824782,0.00012102583,0.0055519836,0.07050434,1.14152186e-7,4.134469e-7,0.000024302512,0.00070424617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817055,0.0006375759,0.00040445643,0.000084228755,0.0004070454,0.0002961378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891907,0.000045106182,0.00054236816,0.000029784624,0.00022138149,0.00024228146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010017663,0.000102178026,0.00024102544,0.000083640916,0.0010466634,0.00006535735,0.00036657267,0.000054457036,0.000019487406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016566599,0.00008625951,0.0002035681,0.00053074514,0.0004114122,0.000258003,0.00008214649,0.00032044074,0.00005017477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006987978,0.00004226819,0.00025945881,0.00001631609,0.0001739992,0.00013448462,0.665892,0.000028104967,0.00073496875,0.21604282,0.11180058,0.004805094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015976094,0.00028298725,0.0052260165,0.00004343775,0.000115416326,0.0000059432373,0.23082915,0.000008983007,0.00007591933,0.0107561415,0.75052744,0.00053096155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004938427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015800175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82430124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001060254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003929495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80501944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365452098","doi":"10.1177/09589287231164341","title":"Explaining willingness to pay taxes: The role of income, education, ideology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Ideology; Redistribution (election); Economics; Demographic economics; Service (business); Government (linguistics); Labour economics; Public economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.0361390599396204,"score_gpt":0.2878116696442471,"score_spread":0.2516726097046267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365452098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77025795,0.0009787923,0.00052980153,0.030454252,0.0012515258,0.00014091941,0.000057025383,0.000028636292,0.19630107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946792,0.00014148963,0.000077542434,0.0009987189,0.0028426412,0.0000019855113,6.8545e-7,0.000014458801,0.0012432659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910784,0.000053732318,0.0005813056,0.00007807054,0.000039589373,0.00013948705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886197,0.000041304625,0.0008446145,0.000089556335,0.00012029624,0.00004223507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067432463,0.00006517005,0.00023003608,0.000243281,0.00017685354,0.000023174227,0.00027847185,0.000017128572,0.000028136365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005186641,0.000050081962,0.00010280619,0.0006004326,0.00006123623,0.0000779688,0.000082796534,0.000115619885,0.00028644907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036560687,0.000097569,0.20103036,0.000023798722,0.00016020836,0.0000036899055,0.033048674,0.0001824295,0.00012612111,0.67598253,0.04803301,0.041275043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013417969,0.00004408677,0.6163435,0.000015373193,0.0000031845568,0.0000032636624,0.0040193144,0.0000049911605,0.000014840425,0.032633383,0.34671706,0.000066806904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008556145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000068561503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6433492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003887873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072522926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36818188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401805214","doi":"10.1177/09589287241240317","title":"Targeted transfers, a left-wing policy? The impact of left-wing governments and corporatism on transfers to low-income families (1982–2019)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Left-wing politics; Economics; Wing; Demographic economics; Right wing; Low income; Left behind; Labour economics; Development economics; Economic system; Political science; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.02357025334696244,"score_gpt":0.3380410247409841,"score_spread":0.31447077139402163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401805214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94262534,0.00024604448,0.00003684504,0.022225756,0.00045243415,0.00031767786,0.00023876454,0.000048503152,0.033808634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98795134,0.0013205144,0.000015111926,0.0007208191,0.009270553,8.507405e-7,0.0000012414771,0.00005481516,0.00066474255],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967943,0.00076286605,0.00073087105,0.00021271972,0.000884324,0.0006149586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989755,0.00025755848,0.0002320163,0.00011385595,0.00013657474,0.0002844968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015415687,0.00030578594,0.00056126126,0.00044297805,0.0012079574,0.0002183213,0.00048400115,0.00011509138,0.000011927605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050526636,0.00019749251,0.0006334642,0.0008109845,0.0007680884,0.00038722443,0.00006418427,0.0005327137,0.000016446305],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048318936,0.00022464036,0.0021245042,0.00017842668,0.0020694651,0.00014668952,0.8518599,0.00023794344,0.01004398,0.055128913,0.01334405,0.06415827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045446716,0.007409481,0.7533762,0.002829219,0.0008468169,0.00011241155,0.16819844,0.00004723801,0.0022490534,0.035863034,0.02198241,0.0025410173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00913857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003999309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7512517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061458995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000812324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99745965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406953556","doi":"10.1177/09589287241312109","title":"Pensions, policy drift and old-age poverty in Western Europe and North America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Poverty; Pension; Context (archaeology); Development economics; Economics; Welfare state; Social policy; Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Economic growth; Political science; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.02608255143968949,"score_gpt":0.33796948553953055,"score_spread":0.31188693409984103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406953556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7902969,0.00038847743,0.000003803151,0.06599117,0.00023278245,0.00016702166,0.000015307978,0.000030430974,0.14287408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662264,0.008789468,0.000043701664,0.010175055,0.008958442,8.5802895e-7,8.3321567e-7,0.000026676524,0.0057785935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978694,0.0007581588,0.00049578544,0.00016127726,0.00028453325,0.0004308829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910253,0.00015912889,0.0003300728,0.00007744427,0.00015612028,0.0001747047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062791375,0.00017013894,0.00041723638,0.00041432714,0.00087225914,0.00013272066,0.000257651,0.0000660488,0.0000025866489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019425225,0.00013886618,0.00009984031,0.0012201716,0.00081952364,0.0002409933,0.00024483862,0.0003836757,0.0000074702675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002915163,0.00042050795,0.20388646,0.00011958735,0.00045446676,0.00067705044,0.35752225,0.0000046744913,0.0002408468,0.11479361,0.051360648,0.27022836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007990103,0.00007590534,0.7796975,0.000060712802,0.000033779936,0.000005869418,0.005530713,4.596778e-7,0.0000013075473,0.0030107575,0.21060903,0.00017498079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070901182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026286966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.575811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011767596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004745902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408024817","doi":"10.1177/09589287241312110","title":"Regional Inequality and the Knowledge Economy: North America and Europe","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Spatial inequality; Economics; Economic inequality; Population; Economic geography; Social inequality; Geography; Demographic economics; Economy; Economic growth; Development economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.036806976875422004,"score_gpt":0.2617428902398325,"score_spread":0.2249359133644105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408024817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49552873,0.0066563985,0.001214046,0.10426772,0.00020874118,0.00014139936,0.00005158261,0.0000113772385,0.39192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891324,0.0030455976,0.000051968203,0.0042961603,0.0018115923,9.404639e-7,0.0000025337163,0.000015252551,0.0016435512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872833,0.00013851511,0.0008043534,0.00016528775,0.000018567867,0.00014495371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988336,0.000101359714,0.0007845035,0.000110403445,0.00009619492,0.00007395101],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077323016,0.000118448865,0.0005062693,0.0002812803,0.00023750078,0.0001353524,0.00023459339,0.000025447127,0.000016726835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020848654,0.000095840514,0.00018209722,0.00032276835,0.00039710785,0.00014105663,0.00013874832,0.00019550267,0.00004542128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010089152,0.000053819997,0.008640091,0.000021326474,0.00031879026,0.0000046261557,0.0015685294,0.000022956694,0.0000011884717,0.965584,0.012156015,0.011527764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011639465,0.00003341082,0.18616283,0.000008221529,0.000027376074,0.0000072688013,0.00009878018,0.00039529352,1.684317e-7,0.044859745,0.76712555,0.000117396376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003383232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048447127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9207243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053910848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081204984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39082628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410313157","doi":"10.1177/09589287251331567","title":"Why are minorities poor? Cross-Atlantic explanations for poverty and public support for redistribution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Poverty; Public support; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Development economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Politics","score_opus":0.0516745704445503,"score_gpt":0.38067613132855993,"score_spread":0.3290015608840096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410313157","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087431744,0.00087830075,0.0055540553,0.7162921,0.003763668,0.0017052824,0.0014500889,0.000164803,0.18275996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96325076,0.00041795327,0.00014160882,0.00958161,0.022068026,0.000015566724,0.000027760421,0.000022671797,0.004474038],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987053,0.00017196704,0.00041764925,0.000109170054,0.00021677198,0.00037914034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985286,0.00020181725,0.00041919493,0.000044236647,0.00070300465,0.000103162085],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001012892,0.00011152108,0.00026708483,0.00021657806,0.0021682633,0.00024439063,0.00021132617,0.000085595166,0.0000040424015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002699349,0.00009611472,0.00023671202,0.0003206186,0.00045784065,0.0003474137,0.00004994819,0.00012007841,9.1783284e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076034106,0.00007320894,0.0036168513,0.000081088394,0.00017423344,0.0000028333704,0.0073386305,2.053939e-7,0.000034893772,0.39236283,0.59275496,0.0034842107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013311151,0.00011488281,0.035646934,0.000039926934,0.00009395922,0.0000031578586,0.02001629,0.0000017624864,0.000018014065,0.034847606,0.9077183,0.00016802944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005136323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052463124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.875819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019063053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044714363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991308},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410457168","doi":"10.1177/09589287251343001","title":"Introduction: Bridging the transatlantic divide in social policy research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Political science; Diversity (politics); Transatlantic relations; Social policy; Poverty; Bridging (networking); Development economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Foreign policy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08104367465057245,"score_gpt":0.44106715601282065,"score_spread":0.3600234813622482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410457168","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060870513,0.00019874208,0.000027705386,0.7728969,0.0006298645,0.00019836419,0.000004159128,0.00002764475,0.16514614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6967685,0.00065818994,0.000005700079,0.0014893321,0.296218,0.0000022839638,3.9369675e-7,0.000018020588,0.004839538],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99437904,0.003104619,0.0006836634,0.0001756074,0.00085011066,0.00080694334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988872,0.0002242879,0.0002858318,0.000107919775,0.0004049358,0.000089838184],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007266676,0.00015538777,0.00037651297,0.000970576,0.0042653265,0.00021695763,0.0007955485,0.00010889536,0.00001445206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027854436,0.00011394889,0.00031881753,0.00357353,0.0016515861,0.00023625698,0.00014895575,0.0011159822,0.000026862623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008783175,0.00013393667,0.0005861954,0.00002917195,0.00015169612,0.000032920896,0.12833445,0.0000056448175,0.0001500396,0.40103176,0.41528222,0.054174125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000900357,0.00005412063,0.108574815,0.00006453661,0.000042047435,0.0000063738607,0.02806139,9.4899116e-7,0.000026856103,0.04992295,0.812149,0.00019659217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066335876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095752697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77140754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000666745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015789024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998134},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4412020220","doi":"10.1177/09589287251356978","title":"When caring comes at a cost: Psychological wellbeing of unpaid and paid carers and the role of social expenditure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Labour economics; Economics; Unpaid work; Demographic economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0371275555001233,"score_gpt":0.4082860543883922,"score_spread":0.3711584988882689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412020220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9115584,0.0018667332,0.000005010969,0.017617252,0.00019028907,0.00024128969,0.000015434787,0.000009001463,0.06849663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963435,0.00035562314,0.000017181492,0.00086687336,0.0015294324,0.0000021554629,7.908926e-7,0.000012331393,0.0008721328],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979,0.0010197312,0.0005936616,0.000094200215,0.00017524572,0.00021715634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988266,0.00030388107,0.0006260751,0.00006215078,0.00013755502,0.00004372802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009396914,0.0001143662,0.00045662888,0.00011621869,0.0008707012,0.000007828252,0.00016206775,0.0000736708,0.000018403953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022625094,0.00007274091,0.00013432442,0.00010439608,0.00044694726,0.00005252715,0.0003319635,0.00041717247,9.539623e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002061277,0.00015345664,0.366034,0.0004565061,0.0009731549,0.000023012124,0.36780155,0.0000011438126,0.0029565764,0.13705139,0.09181345,0.030674499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005593085,0.00014289995,0.8128117,0.00030537893,0.00020492048,0.000005117416,0.04989168,0.000001631597,0.00006130204,0.008271325,0.1225636,0.00014736706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018661788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000037593865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4467777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008315566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005366671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6696818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}