{"meta":{"query_hash":"806523f271be","filters":{"venue":"Journal of European Social Policy"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/806523f271be","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+European+Social+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W2046330977","doi":"10.1177/0958928711418852","title":"The effect of integration and social democratic welfare states on immigrants’ educational attainment: a multilevel estimate","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Welfare state; Argument (complex analysis); Welfare; Democracy; Multilevel model; Educational attainment; Demographic economics; Inequality; European Social Survey; Social integration; Sociology; Social stratification; Politics; Economics; Political science; Development economics; Economic growth; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.021089361883686344,"score_gpt":0.32792145558905256,"score_spread":0.30683209370536624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046330977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958508,0.00020555136,0.0017904339,0.00017830226,0.000008862327,0.000031536634,0.000621008,0.000014565317,0.0012988886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973794,0.00009660065,0.0012751523,0.000020387994,0.0000057617976,0.000046638463,0.0006058013,0.000005601712,0.00056479307],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955481,0.002361285,0.00018791124,0.0005352569,0.0004717958,0.00089568686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99323857,0.0033924463,0.001162098,0.0006359657,0.00078024145,0.00079060753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039292104,0.00057706586,0.0012091801,0.001928318,0.0023544154,0.0021583573,0.0011687891,0.0008704454,0.0044215154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009940262,0.0003589838,0.0032943604,0.002901095,0.0012033387,0.00076564495,0.0039695203,0.0016595001,0.00029647365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018095401,0.000099599005,0.9858203,0.000028770923,0.0013450278,0.00014376575,0.0009870124,0.003205456,0.00022686504,0.0025169344,0.00043923984,0.00500609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004292077,0.00027816996,0.9655942,0.000084645995,0.0010272898,0.00006800654,0.003644748,0.026090888,0.00032143336,0.0009243329,0.0018766647,0.000046632686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.552591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4837721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.552591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025213114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046922974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9000877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122827996","doi":"10.1177/0958928712449776","title":"Convergent care regimes? Childcare arrangements in Australia, Canada, Finland and Sweden","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":118,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Politics; Diversity (politics); Political science; Investment (military); Political economy; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.04888706098779951,"score_gpt":0.3537375339511574,"score_spread":0.30485047296335793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122827996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642887,0.0015717089,0.00012614507,0.004930074,0.00002610507,0.000032803386,0.00012423487,0.000005826067,0.028894344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99707437,0.0006748507,0.00017177925,0.0003367883,0.0000040231203,0.000018857938,0.000053488664,0.0000038371018,0.0016620376],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995906,0.0010177331,0.00018811796,0.00032230935,0.0010905737,0.0014751761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526155,0.0007305979,0.0007880764,0.00015740842,0.001445225,0.0016171834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002609352,0.00014472059,0.00035245993,0.0016292428,0.00969271,0.0051202616,0.0011467148,0.0010810498,0.002385646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008724002,0.00016976618,0.00021558239,0.0033340743,0.0062447465,0.0019476243,0.005800805,0.0017958131,0.00010510014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003013099,0.00019214716,0.16257079,0.00033105502,0.00009861958,0.0017472522,0.48105544,0.0010307791,0.0010288066,0.27493972,0.006065937,0.07063815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057372443,0.00007298475,0.43507013,0.0009353539,0.000060340582,0.00036477725,0.5024802,0.0008830372,0.0005056699,0.006569762,0.052886687,0.00011359007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9218974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95000005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07810259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05714668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08422714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41463017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147244892","doi":"10.1177/0958928704046879","title":"Mechanisms of poverty alleviation: anti-poverty effects of non-means-tested and means-tested benefits in five welfare states","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Economics; Welfare; Public economics; Social protection; Development economics; Social assistance; Welfare state; Social Welfare; Social policy; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.013454083260715352,"score_gpt":0.288081392532543,"score_spread":0.27462730927182766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147244892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99060905,0.000666894,0.0009861307,0.0004300617,0.00000983946,0.000055446155,0.00016885313,0.000021069927,0.007052682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916744,0.00014946116,0.00030328368,0.000033489778,0.0000039734855,0.000022823,0.00003857338,0.000001651071,0.00027941825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971161,0.0019170038,0.000084764826,0.00016332431,0.00025145066,0.0004674233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99144346,0.0055543766,0.0016963528,0.00044869576,0.00048651983,0.00037069386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050715436,0.00038014376,0.0006674643,0.002136649,0.0008248283,0.0016106862,0.0008751553,0.0007182909,0.0056666965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063639176,0.00022171088,0.0017649358,0.0012615913,0.0030513273,0.001373382,0.0035647524,0.0006308555,0.00012645782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008247194,0.0038389405,0.43883288,0.0014351271,0.0043051704,0.0005908478,0.0057070013,0.050482333,0.009826387,0.31466317,0.0016828479,0.16038817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006821442,0.0027365093,0.89459264,0.00023561169,0.003011655,0.00016056858,0.0057761767,0.019216422,0.006507188,0.061471924,0.005523058,0.00008609934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004423039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049562803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056666965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023793436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011133389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026821256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162164252","doi":"10.1177/0958928707084449","title":"Decommodification and activation in social democratic policy: resolving the paradox","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Unemployment; Welfare state; Democracy; Social policy; Payroll; Social security; Welfare; Labour economics; Social Welfare; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.07374187511969253,"score_gpt":0.36587300490174895,"score_spread":0.2921311297820564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162164252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66296923,0.0035959308,0.08154623,0.077269495,0.00037808775,0.00022011597,0.00014735134,0.00014830449,0.17372526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951556,0.00024302927,0.0019485971,0.0011324963,0.000106762855,0.00006580807,0.000012485657,0.0000122516385,0.0013229309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823423,0.010488569,0.0006456361,0.0021422396,0.0020068781,0.0023743224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97944665,0.011338441,0.0038832051,0.0032370905,0.0010887191,0.0010059394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019333627,0.0005319344,0.0011277212,0.0013636436,0.0029041283,0.0052696457,0.0011334156,0.0027978243,0.0049021295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030519988,0.00030942206,0.00084048684,0.0018418245,0.013442121,0.007487778,0.009430012,0.0045266286,0.0002968521],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016590492,0.00012440763,0.0021584856,0.00008404718,0.000036593075,0.00008024826,0.001886087,0.0043600774,0.00050467806,0.9723961,0.00056400645,0.017639473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013217807,0.00009619434,0.0041813287,0.00007329464,0.000023455192,0.000036466958,0.0011054983,0.0046761516,0.00077974104,0.9797934,0.0090867765,0.000015488704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016188555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014256727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019333627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005465531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005527176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10224724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162354131","doi":"10.1177/0958928712449774","title":"All in the family? Migrants, nationhood, and care regimes in Asia and North America","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; International Labour Organization","keywords":"Work (physics); Mediterranean climate; Care work; Demographic economics; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Gender studies; Development economics; Geography; Economics","score_opus":0.056210372281010564,"score_gpt":0.34880460642312533,"score_spread":0.2925942341421148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162354131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9943441,0.00040143565,0.000025174275,0.0011583006,0.0000055656988,0.0000020100133,0.000008478135,7.3769365e-7,0.0040541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994166,0.0002479006,0.000026534584,0.00008997299,0.0000037450227,0.0000028825864,0.0000038841413,5.9995784e-7,0.00020795983],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993844,0.00030735738,0.000024947461,0.000049333976,0.000036965193,0.00019705908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984718,0.0003026895,0.0006512815,0.00006670642,0.00010466307,0.00040279582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011907087,0.000102380065,0.00019661598,0.00075541495,0.0033097067,0.0017949825,0.0004693781,0.00048217547,0.0018384972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017996904,0.00009401393,0.00014944615,0.0010956122,0.005004613,0.001903013,0.0025163803,0.0005650413,0.000050436603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012461771,0.00015348193,0.6611831,0.00011100602,0.000047478203,0.0016133991,0.25534624,0.00027410593,0.00042516692,0.04671962,0.0014915983,0.032510214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013081671,0.00007484673,0.5860776,0.00033414282,0.00002672792,0.00062016834,0.39947733,0.00019921815,0.00009655082,0.0030021404,0.010056933,0.000021243388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04696848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10094666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04696848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021856949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020915372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09339023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2701172916","doi":"10.1177/0958928717700563","title":"Federalism, policy change, and social security in Belgium: Explaining the decentralization of family allowances in the Sixth State Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Decentralization; Veto; Federalism; Politics; Social security; Political science; State (computer science); French; Clientelism; Public administration; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Sociology; Democracy; Law; Humanities","score_opus":0.11314143582832145,"score_gpt":0.393101392476008,"score_spread":0.2799599566476866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2701172916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7796605,0.0022086932,0.008640999,0.030977082,0.00008026868,0.00006011754,0.00010439557,0.000072614836,0.17819531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99721175,0.000113873946,0.0004226555,0.00020931027,0.000009748523,0.000011543892,0.00000811923,0.0000053564872,0.0020076374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965417,0.0018906482,0.000081142585,0.0002082584,0.00023731787,0.0010409465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883515,0.00043186266,0.00028205573,0.00010537512,0.00015554464,0.00019003788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025399595,0.00017278494,0.0003197433,0.0009033573,0.004232986,0.0039079925,0.0006674627,0.002438001,0.0023196395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036963143,0.00021164023,0.0005549761,0.001077401,0.0076556555,0.0020177038,0.0027738118,0.0017335668,0.000101127815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004236227,0.000044580043,0.004484269,0.00002882345,0.000013508815,0.00032077957,0.009148392,0.0055106245,0.00041492452,0.97397894,0.0011860784,0.0048267115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011459618,0.0001399188,0.08672047,0.00035908207,0.00008350003,0.0005036755,0.03459629,0.02382683,0.001991421,0.68375415,0.16777025,0.00013991108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15966377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16963422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15966377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019027397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062369728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31746882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785792178","doi":"10.1177/0958928717700564","title":"The case for welfare state universalism, or the lasting relevance of the paradox of redistribution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Universalism; Operationalization; Redistribution (election); Redistribution of income and wealth; Welfare state; Argument (complex analysis); Positive economics; Poverty; Economics; Politics; Welfare; Public economics; Neoclassical economics; Political science; Sociology; Economic growth; Public good; Law; Market economy; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04331353503707856,"score_gpt":0.3564143436480617,"score_spread":0.3131008086109831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785792178","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21711823,0.0160305,0.13081585,0.42284095,0.0018594259,0.00014254224,0.00048859755,0.00031145997,0.21039239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751232,0.0015711115,0.004971823,0.012425357,0.00089500414,0.00011382374,0.000054249238,0.00007090782,0.004774603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929554,0.003229488,0.00020363122,0.0017890529,0.0011013603,0.00072125613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98806715,0.006118973,0.0015881303,0.0027355435,0.00088614656,0.0006041534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013365803,0.000375698,0.0008974646,0.0015001821,0.0021668514,0.004543713,0.0012864885,0.0024299312,0.004054492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019459741,0.00024943743,0.00083029026,0.0017874696,0.027387602,0.011689577,0.005823688,0.005583705,0.00029961806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045763103,0.000026718317,0.0012562526,0.000075754644,0.000022764812,0.000045609868,0.0019076419,0.00040822107,0.000113554626,0.98211056,0.0023124309,0.011674634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021343281,0.000025345942,0.0019953398,0.0000733307,0.000008320143,0.000045350058,0.0006142543,0.00038600818,0.00013435536,0.97743386,0.019248895,0.000013606807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025267776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001294331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013365803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044553494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026220556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07068598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806491966","doi":"10.1177/0958928718768337","title":"The migrant in the market: Care penalties and immigration in eight liberal welfare regimes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Immigration; Wage; Care work; Demographic economics; Labour economics; Work (physics); Economics; Health care; Welfare state; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.02923861771700855,"score_gpt":0.3742886515606977,"score_spread":0.34505003384368915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806491966","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992003,0.00005892987,0.00002497388,0.00006497889,0.0000016758094,0.0000035736691,0.000025269612,4.128451e-7,0.0006198485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996749,0.00004344611,0.000027777389,0.000019338628,0.000003533146,0.0000055567916,0.000067293666,6.901963e-7,0.00015740054],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889344,0.00033690856,0.000084568404,0.0000776726,0.00021280456,0.00039462635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972082,0.0006219725,0.0014016954,0.00011274991,0.00020885249,0.00044653076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017045204,0.00015123952,0.0003240436,0.0014092072,0.0013313605,0.0016343242,0.0004690096,0.00039531768,0.0015232785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00464595,0.00013289232,0.0002740308,0.0016662546,0.0018136011,0.00082715886,0.0035804948,0.0007665353,0.00010924993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015426739,0.00008510449,0.9860092,0.000017447066,0.00002379513,0.00015990286,0.0060553844,0.0001930313,0.00013808883,0.0013685334,0.00017422932,0.005621106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004447921,0.000050069426,0.98569113,0.000030809715,0.000009275473,0.000054304877,0.0131109115,0.00024020241,0.000052336574,0.00029285913,0.00045887413,0.000004775096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028756566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064828716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028756566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013251827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012151669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057178378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900705452","doi":"10.1177/0958928718807404","title":"Promoting policy consistency and continuity in the EU through the trio: Alcohol-related harm on the council presidency agenda","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Policy Transfer and Learning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Presidency; Consistency (knowledge bases); Public administration; European union; Political science; Club; Law; Economics; Medicine; Politics; Economic policy","score_opus":0.1286216213090674,"score_gpt":0.3728939072967299,"score_spread":0.24427228598766249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900705452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4665272,0.015342908,0.028273273,0.19593324,0.003374291,0.00077683065,0.0003873289,0.00027205446,0.28911284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96203184,0.002171239,0.010779038,0.016142996,0.00030075145,0.00038913413,0.00021931191,0.00008477537,0.007880951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.93652344,0.042965088,0.0034123352,0.0027419147,0.0078368485,0.006520389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94956017,0.026400803,0.006505798,0.0063789855,0.0056169694,0.0055373083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06665122,0.0002827982,0.0008406226,0.0026445992,0.0042426707,0.010662078,0.0018450702,0.005144712,0.0041767326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07867925,0.00037384068,0.0007182923,0.003251799,0.008656318,0.010020171,0.016105866,0.005758614,0.00037669283],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031554187,0.0003961116,0.028606933,0.0018499878,0.00018715244,0.0007597173,0.05490263,0.0022234134,0.001121024,0.6873192,0.023022356,0.199296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016861667,0.0005350395,0.111645974,0.006619871,0.00013291553,0.0003093503,0.093130894,0.0014934485,0.0019962378,0.1562784,0.6275015,0.00018776908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007927164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009220868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06665122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075365943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029888256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35248953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979797233","doi":"10.1177/0958928720963324","title":"Reducing mommy penalties with daddy quotas","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Natural experiment; Difference in differences; Demographic economics; Work (physics); Significant difference; Percentage point; Economics; Labour economics; Econometrics; Statistics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0443435289234627,"score_gpt":0.3097906158552715,"score_spread":0.2654470869318088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979797233","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9276229,0.0006467195,0.014181824,0.005619836,0.00023809365,0.00077797595,0.0011581951,0.00037345674,0.04938092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897814,0.000099690886,0.0026109077,0.00087173417,0.00003584668,0.00022176464,0.00013248032,0.00001089678,0.0062352847],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947007,0.002564537,0.0001410942,0.00037637356,0.0010551058,0.0011622059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890887,0.0049698013,0.0024420773,0.0012377946,0.0011017314,0.0011598446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077676955,0.00032898923,0.00050857326,0.00067444146,0.0015808571,0.001476897,0.001410529,0.0013550519,0.013071572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02774616,0.00019948627,0.0003892419,0.0007343317,0.0022548223,0.0008582735,0.0018629222,0.0011595887,0.0007191271],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005987508,0.008396509,0.32189,0.0011735343,0.00052211294,0.00094398885,0.012214166,0.032862894,0.021874009,0.15262707,0.036651187,0.40485704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012571209,0.007564675,0.68990695,0.00069516833,0.00031236306,0.00030927293,0.01533255,0.024377447,0.011012207,0.03698308,0.21199614,0.0002529866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089628674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17433119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089628674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056232833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007615636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17821395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2998302662","doi":"10.1177/0958928719891339","title":"Time and well-being, an institutional, comparative perspective: Is it time to explore the idea of a time policy?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Time perspective; Well-being; Welfare; Perspective (graphical); European Social Survey; Social policy; Positive economics; Public economics; Time-use survey; Economics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Space time","score_opus":0.05769488705693784,"score_gpt":0.3929239873847438,"score_spread":0.335229100327806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2998302662","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39222547,0.1334211,0.04047441,0.17419639,0.00188551,0.000066705856,0.00048576033,0.000030099074,0.2572145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9814503,0.0132370675,0.0018609249,0.0017246363,0.0004911374,0.000043322012,0.00005787326,0.000012848373,0.0011218683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965828,0.0025572316,0.000092899245,0.00027637847,0.00021774508,0.0002729039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935588,0.004579757,0.0008232889,0.0003563478,0.00027433346,0.00040750433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051019164,0.00030099435,0.0005224977,0.002719883,0.0015752615,0.006305392,0.0006801189,0.0015485914,0.0039100107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007267689,0.00015557684,0.00039200962,0.0042161844,0.015851349,0.010506883,0.003024516,0.0019835427,0.00015022467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000664714,0.00006522205,0.0063682604,0.00028611158,0.00004425434,0.000085822256,0.008888163,0.000902202,0.00018336374,0.95506203,0.0009455302,0.027102493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024978477,0.00025482077,0.045363642,0.0020788785,0.0000976997,0.0002530119,0.06443251,0.0013189486,0.00051564584,0.7813369,0.10425176,0.00007129665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033875902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032683082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006305392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036061706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018959516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02698183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3101396588","doi":"10.1177/0958928720954685","title":"The public face of interest group lobbying on immigration: Who responds to and who ignores what they say","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Credibility; Public opinion; Immigration policy; Public policy; Face (sociological concept); Political science; Interest group; Demographic economics; Political economy; Economics; Sociology; Politics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.068056253370828,"score_gpt":0.33610336122721474,"score_spread":0.26804710785638675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3101396588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79115474,0.0008522854,0.0016725695,0.06441699,0.00043705522,0.00007809796,0.000052476968,0.000029633855,0.1413061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942615,0.0002566669,0.00019309804,0.0024032241,0.00012661793,0.000038079324,0.000009462003,0.000011431873,0.0027000562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799606,0.0149183,0.00029254679,0.00074719155,0.0020748107,0.0020064977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9142355,0.073033124,0.006928704,0.001782006,0.0020420759,0.0019786013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020762455,0.0004023406,0.00056875317,0.00085123506,0.0053098574,0.009442768,0.0006713159,0.00598504,0.011714509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058289435,0.00031859736,0.00036738708,0.0010658442,0.00789129,0.0047079413,0.0037652652,0.004685973,0.0011601014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045830114,0.0041833213,0.18039909,0.0011623317,0.0004028178,0.0016647703,0.20208903,0.0020122996,0.011161189,0.29445556,0.035935115,0.26195148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010838908,0.0021390717,0.1751621,0.0015707439,0.0008269774,0.00049084716,0.41133112,0.00755802,0.014167561,0.19912241,0.18623738,0.00030985387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024233875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020365966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020762455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035653422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002161393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10980368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134410751","doi":"10.1177/0958928721996651","title":"Taking subnational and regional welfare states seriously: Insights from the Quebec case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"Université Laval","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare state; Economics; Political science; State (computer science); Public economics; Development economics; Politics; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.043064257523419636,"score_gpt":0.33388467356384205,"score_spread":0.2908204160404224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134410751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3938589,0.012666365,0.005040529,0.026832838,0.00010266129,0.00014961208,0.0014280954,0.000041870466,0.5598792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866077,0.0025879047,0.0010136146,0.00090837636,0.00001769784,0.00005027702,0.0001512399,0.000008659079,0.008654713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755776,0.0010412041,0.000053967244,0.00016778817,0.00034828077,0.00083091797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636674,0.0018686319,0.00035461807,0.00016535303,0.00096771866,0.00027693695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017307501,0.00031354532,0.00040587393,0.0028030856,0.006712273,0.0053302557,0.001067504,0.0014584583,0.006197784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004703807,0.0001544694,0.00052785134,0.005860864,0.004557846,0.002173346,0.001670324,0.0012367264,0.00019764337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007594186,0.00005984303,0.028027406,0.00029318585,0.00007202466,0.0027221164,0.024482496,0.005235608,0.0004101723,0.9040693,0.010733436,0.02381844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001378246,0.00009858328,0.19414501,0.002874327,0.0005512776,0.001452644,0.19160903,0.027622078,0.0008732775,0.162486,0.4178984,0.00025163442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9790661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98876613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058049046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058049046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025797151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42117727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239997264","doi":"10.1177/0958928720918973","title":"Targeting within universalism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Universalism; Political science; Welfare; Population; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.05382739620325934,"score_gpt":0.336557945324404,"score_spread":0.28273054912114465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239997264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13302866,0.002063795,0.19284539,0.024759058,0.0003428405,0.00018821743,0.00021047314,0.00034843647,0.64621323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9782151,0.00035345898,0.0087934,0.0023437976,0.0001079599,0.00012447232,0.0000371881,0.0000525634,0.009972084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99201643,0.0033218022,0.00033146804,0.0017377018,0.0013214425,0.0012712323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99513763,0.001309198,0.00091021194,0.0015306667,0.00064503634,0.00046730132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006066943,0.0005117381,0.0005577602,0.0011034565,0.0023507758,0.004515572,0.00089842884,0.0022258328,0.005113989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008219701,0.0002735474,0.0008789415,0.0006741179,0.011413163,0.0053389114,0.0074396105,0.0031029445,0.0005884904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015215225,0.000011949437,0.00056514924,0.000041515243,0.000012940423,0.000022510632,0.00066533475,0.0003158586,0.00031888558,0.9907251,0.0004903256,0.0068152077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019528748,0.000114614835,0.0020956905,0.00015814495,0.000042030388,0.00014589753,0.0007071964,0.0012099352,0.0012914438,0.94765306,0.04653977,0.000022675316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016919762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015658925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006066943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033020424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003504671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03208548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365452098","doi":"10.1177/09589287231164341","title":"Explaining willingness to pay taxes: The role of income, education, ideology","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Willingness to pay; Ideology; Redistribution (election); Economics; Demographic economics; Service (business); Government (linguistics); Labour economics; Public economics; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.0361390599396204,"score_gpt":0.2878116696442471,"score_spread":0.2516726097046267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365452098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965521,0.0000500496,0.00039600552,0.00027063087,0.000004026478,0.000009377604,0.000043546508,0.0000024107253,0.0026717593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945897,0.000026476733,0.00007381962,0.000011376701,0.0000037867853,0.000002924131,0.000039160725,8.4005126e-7,0.00038269476],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993888,0.00031499608,0.000022433263,0.000044816985,0.000057573812,0.00017143362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942204,0.003716662,0.0010261642,0.0002673748,0.00020655883,0.00056289893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014237148,0.00018750112,0.000240619,0.0008206016,0.00045890786,0.0016237446,0.00025333624,0.0006458887,0.006734019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049657025,0.000103282786,0.00056979706,0.0006615492,0.00075437943,0.000533254,0.00065302936,0.00091238465,0.00042633343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008554976,0.00025985704,0.9863551,0.000014504515,0.00005851985,0.000119741024,0.0009828295,0.0010673562,0.00013421208,0.004130295,0.0002860871,0.006505881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025711399,0.0001521774,0.9699266,0.0000546275,0.00008171276,0.0001553854,0.0064792936,0.011891671,0.00020662716,0.009168727,0.0018385242,0.000019046853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066765645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047757775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006734019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047393315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005344373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022527516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401805214","doi":"10.1177/09589287241240317","title":"Targeted transfers, a left-wing policy? The impact of left-wing governments and corporatism on transfers to low-income families (1982–2019)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Left-wing politics; Economics; Wing; Demographic economics; Right wing; Low income; Left behind; Labour economics; Development economics; Economic system; Political science; Politics; Medicine","score_opus":0.02357025334696244,"score_gpt":0.3380410247409841,"score_spread":0.31447077139402163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401805214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98902994,0.00081274257,0.00011036876,0.0019682883,0.000023101038,0.000008798034,0.0002826057,0.000006915872,0.0077572553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988651,0.00020239432,0.000027744778,0.00013115516,0.000019029194,0.0000053019344,0.000070795686,0.0000013764262,0.0006770935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836725,0.0005822077,0.000047950896,0.00011280703,0.00023278903,0.0006569577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937568,0.002265148,0.0028338744,0.00024800416,0.0003128475,0.0005832703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019136628,0.00011079064,0.0002831527,0.0006628627,0.00048001183,0.0010430948,0.00025497482,0.00043989203,0.0036742701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069427798,0.000059962156,0.00045070125,0.0008360134,0.0012550002,0.0007498658,0.0011012213,0.0009254465,0.00020488477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010761195,0.00044401572,0.90095866,0.000196275,0.0003969472,0.00087100454,0.0031206226,0.0045550973,0.00093204965,0.019453991,0.0028824417,0.065112814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002852191,0.0001851382,0.99257773,0.000063069325,0.00009268477,0.000040518677,0.002073486,0.0004572373,0.00045419313,0.00093279965,0.003086755,0.000007786578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029991362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03087165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029991362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018573692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014293337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059633553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406953556","doi":"10.1177/09589287241312109","title":"Pensions, policy drift and old-age poverty in Western Europe and North America","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Retrenchment; Poverty; Pension; Context (archaeology); Development economics; Economics; Welfare state; Social policy; Government (linguistics); Demographic economics; Economic growth; Political science; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.02608255143968949,"score_gpt":0.33796948553953055,"score_spread":0.31188693409984103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406953556","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98753846,0.004139593,0.000050179246,0.0015523058,0.000028064751,0.000004253727,0.00018860992,0.0000045491397,0.0064941323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956001,0.0028604532,0.00005220151,0.00023883063,0.00001914069,0.000007549933,0.00018518713,0.0000028567467,0.0010336989],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964523,0.000071485156,0.000033053635,0.000042915217,0.00006309242,0.00014425314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988398,0.0001249101,0.0005752581,0.000046633137,0.00020090498,0.00021259193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095067197,0.00011021499,0.00020614888,0.0021859384,0.001039626,0.0013794242,0.0002560721,0.00037869404,0.0011911868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019322864,0.000098920595,0.00015497542,0.0028557586,0.0008597981,0.0012910351,0.0014028115,0.00043579174,0.000100744546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015725492,0.00011933411,0.905522,0.00016405593,0.00011993298,0.00050746225,0.022871118,0.00036837978,0.00028895127,0.005354132,0.004245673,0.06028175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046188056,0.000024069224,0.97440976,0.00017967349,0.000020163305,0.00014617649,0.01326908,0.000079245685,0.000081248516,0.0005149556,0.011261767,0.0000092359605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.096895464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16580853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90310454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001387734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013313441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1926629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408024817","doi":"10.1177/09589287241312110","title":"Regional Inequality and the Knowledge Economy: North America and Europe","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inequality; Spatial inequality; Economics; Economic inequality; Population; Economic geography; Social inequality; Geography; Demographic economics; Economy; Economic growth; Development economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.036806976875422004,"score_gpt":0.2617428902398325,"score_spread":0.2249359133644105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408024817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95059323,0.010464999,0.00040044906,0.002848349,0.000031599055,0.000009004176,0.0006312842,0.000007590416,0.035013467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975708,0.0014962018,0.00008708736,0.00010812233,0.000027204187,0.000004182426,0.00020774687,0.00000258346,0.00049605645],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937135,0.00010504499,0.00003123818,0.00010718089,0.00012767641,0.00025751186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808985,0.0004300079,0.000748765,0.00009487757,0.00034269193,0.0002937807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006818072,0.00011098424,0.0003059947,0.0032736498,0.0009020319,0.0021574579,0.00032633962,0.00032642393,0.0030301316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025059686,0.00008008908,0.00023127612,0.0074729305,0.0018570414,0.0015108666,0.0020440065,0.0004369652,0.00009942218],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029900504,0.00013287883,0.79252875,0.00026308178,0.0002849702,0.0005214278,0.02389289,0.0025781193,0.00053888035,0.086470224,0.0055121123,0.086977564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074637537,0.000017856017,0.97327393,0.00021390806,0.00003029259,0.000114843184,0.007938911,0.00047864838,0.00007538254,0.0047928053,0.013042722,0.0000132577015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1301876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16799101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1301876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016474185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000994134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25885963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410313157","doi":"10.1177/09589287251331567","title":"Why are minorities poor? Cross-Atlantic explanations for poverty and public support for redistribution","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Redistribution (election); Poverty; Public support; Political science; Demographic economics; Economics; Development economics; Public economics; Economic growth; Politics","score_opus":0.0516745704445503,"score_gpt":0.38067613132855993,"score_spread":0.3290015608840096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410313157","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9200712,0.0014440859,0.0007020683,0.029515395,0.000065030916,0.000011926076,0.00014850432,0.000010363906,0.04803139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998995,0.0002345965,0.000033777047,0.00020633175,0.000024503563,0.0000027948727,0.00001258903,0.0000014361754,0.00048895297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913436,0.00033816329,0.000022871965,0.00006084841,0.00013058199,0.00031329054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690396,0.0012554243,0.0010721252,0.00021715318,0.00025863783,0.0002926921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014891564,0.00018414961,0.00019451226,0.001713655,0.0019512326,0.0025658,0.00039273791,0.0009982093,0.008810493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007555013,0.00010098539,0.00034048661,0.001337647,0.0034204018,0.0018958668,0.0031590536,0.001101885,0.00026754377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018717365,0.0002415812,0.7233027,0.00012939866,0.00014932564,0.0009658752,0.04113808,0.0009882486,0.00026629417,0.18194127,0.0041630077,0.04652702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046733705,0.00009640142,0.73321706,0.00058213144,0.000117914846,0.00044866346,0.12165909,0.0030305835,0.0004760192,0.11679197,0.02349635,0.000037088837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015390295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016263243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015390295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023365694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001004315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030601442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410457168","doi":"10.1177/09589287251343001","title":"Introduction: Bridging the transatlantic divide in social policy research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Exceptionalism; Political science; Diversity (politics); Transatlantic relations; Social policy; Poverty; Bridging (networking); Development economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Foreign policy; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.08104367465057245,"score_gpt":0.44106715601282065,"score_spread":0.3600234813622482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410457168","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047259242,0.024767682,0.0026325702,0.18369909,0.7627511,0.00010490437,0.00061651634,0.00023523482,0.024720317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00474892,0.02092085,0.0019992362,0.075459994,0.847974,0.00022527055,0.0008008531,0.00044420015,0.047426764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541324,0.0014637256,0.00040601252,0.00078721583,0.0015645066,0.0003652057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97574174,0.016173126,0.001117793,0.0011342254,0.004059428,0.0017736136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004868089,0.0017401543,0.001719793,0.003386193,0.0034426684,0.010173278,0.002677674,0.008119658,0.0355892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018179825,0.00075910863,0.0018081047,0.0035168251,0.0035335787,0.0060795965,0.0042120526,0.013393851,0.016140223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012533246,0.000015563048,0.000089955145,0.00017009983,0.0000059650756,0.000025338097,0.00009832763,0.00005673984,0.00006314208,0.0037992322,0.98579663,0.009866468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009599693,0.000041075786,0.0005867957,0.00064822345,0.000007195002,0.000106996,0.00018187461,0.00014801201,0.00005337582,0.007157482,0.9910417,0.000017722261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001685189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002829742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0355892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031198007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003470206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119057715},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4412020220","doi":"10.1177/09589287251356978","title":"When caring comes at a cost: Psychological wellbeing of unpaid and paid carers and the role of social expenditure","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of European Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Labour economics; Economics; Unpaid work; Demographic economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.0371275555001233,"score_gpt":0.4082860543883922,"score_spread":0.3711584988882689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412020220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975528,0.0005669897,0.000090399575,0.0006991889,0.00001207425,0.0000031239483,0.000048287417,9.4546857e-7,0.0010261732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961215,0.00013522852,0.000033440618,0.00004793191,0.000006871408,0.0000020787875,0.000028725142,5.034266e-7,0.00013293333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907255,0.00040706014,0.00005160372,0.000076290446,0.00013068765,0.00026180453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967158,0.00089090306,0.0013962188,0.00013159934,0.0001702408,0.00069524685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095368206,0.00023009829,0.00031012346,0.0007866008,0.00065368036,0.0017848806,0.00040424522,0.000649827,0.001929057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005921243,0.00014334363,0.00039324575,0.00076221325,0.0010488678,0.0009854129,0.001883549,0.0009533137,0.00015336236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002459987,0.00023560961,0.9672888,0.00007049749,0.00020000011,0.00038921292,0.008303165,0.00027517305,0.00034769677,0.0012571834,0.0004105646,0.020976145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003816338,0.00011566278,0.9832776,0.00005312134,0.00003392786,0.0002108147,0.014794101,0.00023228176,0.000050135,0.00065373775,0.00056466786,0.0000102045415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005507132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009239662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005507132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006223097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060199195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010950148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}