{"meta":{"query_hash":"a2ee5b57665a","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science"},"cohort_total":21,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":21,"exported":21,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/a2ee5b57665a","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Experimental+Political+Science"},"results":[{"id":"W2486609957","doi":"10.1017/xps.2015.7","title":"The Electoral Sweet Spot in the Lab","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Compromise; Proportionality (law); Sweet spot; Accountability; Proportional representation; Fragmentation (computing); Proposition; Electoral system; Political science; Econometrics; Economics; Computer science; Law; Philosophy; Epistemology; Simulation","score_opus":0.04891368512640545,"score_gpt":0.40623400757422284,"score_spread":0.3573203224478174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2486609957","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91679215,0.00027848923,0.020601844,0.0039802007,0.00013502123,0.00033337792,0.0005448508,0.00042245167,0.0569116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934369,0.000037942587,0.0028266297,0.0003193467,0.000014324511,0.00015909642,0.000093379575,0.000026233507,0.0030860598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926219,0.005517201,0.00011779134,0.0004750306,0.00061932165,0.0006487687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98478657,0.007924823,0.001432814,0.0031245316,0.00094282115,0.0017884744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007320249,0.0003296049,0.0009860059,0.0004697792,0.0018379084,0.0024371548,0.000987974,0.0012401171,0.023492252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022966262,0.0005102389,0.00025778095,0.0005321603,0.0036213137,0.0018509052,0.002839423,0.0011559201,0.002916977],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025054922,0.011666315,0.10928483,0.0015717713,0.00071893574,0.0012454753,0.010002689,0.034130387,0.14949518,0.37647316,0.06516409,0.2151922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008352138,0.026954273,0.12581448,0.00058487215,0.00046024885,0.0012657503,0.016392,0.099638104,0.13334288,0.34903127,0.23756064,0.00060335285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070209713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008883346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023492252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021732333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021358521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07858938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763524440","doi":"10.1017/xps.2017.13","title":"Ethnoreligious Identity, Immigration, and Redistribution","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Vignette; Redistribution (election); Ethnic group; Political science; Multiculturalism; Politics; Public opinion; Demographic economics; Welfare; Inequality; Cultural diversity; Residence; Political economy; Sociology; Social psychology; Economics; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.037400999916678536,"score_gpt":0.4387847005715108,"score_spread":0.40138370065483225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763524440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897904,0.000058873266,0.00004689853,0.00044192828,0.000006547503,0.000009269253,0.000017680482,0.0000012645153,0.009627272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992849,0.00003738547,0.000031933363,0.00006148898,0.000002855365,0.000005461013,0.0000064496494,5.98262e-7,0.00056888594],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886847,0.00061338313,0.000028378778,0.00009477879,0.00016369905,0.00023134192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543494,0.0015157831,0.0017575865,0.00026518537,0.00035902133,0.0006675017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026539972,0.00014825746,0.0002374122,0.000917877,0.003821694,0.0025647434,0.0003467653,0.00046402036,0.007458469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065646474,0.00009977491,0.00013456083,0.00078674627,0.0041053765,0.0005956375,0.0022846318,0.0006213283,0.00019929747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00058926566,0.0028462748,0.8642746,0.00012334611,0.000111016634,0.000322701,0.0705733,0.00032699178,0.001514544,0.019615768,0.0014040122,0.038298186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050308936,0.00016368389,0.9146405,0.00009771969,0.000038849863,0.000060531565,0.07750975,0.00031193424,0.00032273697,0.0032072987,0.0035796042,0.00001704316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07067944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09323263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07067944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028392742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024873896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14053607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765546808","doi":"10.1017/xps.2017.15","title":"Individual Preferences for FDI in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from China","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Economic Policies and Impacts","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Foreign direct investment; Respondent; Backlash; China; Developing country; Salience (neuroscience); Business; Economics; International economics; Political science; Economic growth; Psychology; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.13552080601850575,"score_gpt":0.3588450527218879,"score_spread":0.22332424670338213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765546808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99966323,0.000008233719,0.00003833202,0.000014103323,8.5036237e-7,0.000009840497,0.000030868898,4.128556e-7,0.00023415397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995359,0.000018954426,0.00008591502,0.00002417525,0.0000019349175,0.00002273588,0.00007389736,4.822476e-7,0.00023606552],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854654,0.000959477,0.000064272215,0.0001365519,0.00013138242,0.00016165353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98694533,0.0071603553,0.0028664442,0.0016872472,0.0006096075,0.00073099096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064708213,0.00036313527,0.0004295044,0.00046702076,0.00084896735,0.00075820385,0.00043526653,0.00048979034,0.003989708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063405256,0.00018474176,0.0005142054,0.0007772615,0.0017025474,0.00036462533,0.0006167614,0.0005697691,0.00028857784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0056964764,0.00655176,0.9594031,0.00011042344,0.00044100848,0.00030318164,0.004227424,0.003048658,0.0040255967,0.001861749,0.00064613955,0.013684333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074916985,0.0043127886,0.9777044,0.000023414157,0.00026124853,0.000086679946,0.005014647,0.0063613304,0.0031519965,0.001200423,0.0010813456,0.000052562515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016797118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01319499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016797118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008886911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000700812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03422135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799605010","doi":"10.1017/xps.2018.1","title":"How to Survey About Electoral Turnout? Additional Evidence","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Turnout; Cognitive reframing; Voter turnout; Incentive; Political science; Variety (cybernetics); Measure (data warehouse); Survey data collection; Demographic economics; Public economics; Voting; Psychology; Social psychology; Economics; Computer science; Statistics; Microeconomics; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.11211291719306517,"score_gpt":0.43854345929402105,"score_spread":0.3264305421009559,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799605010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5265961,0.061406627,0.045688126,0.09142391,0.00409502,0.0015535027,0.039446335,0.0002501671,0.22954021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85093695,0.035054427,0.034937568,0.02686886,0.0027982045,0.0019145358,0.029735608,0.00014510982,0.017608676],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96323264,0.023732353,0.0025917892,0.0035418703,0.0059117004,0.0009896458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5180865,0.33879745,0.040218186,0.033750415,0.06525888,0.0038885248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062601104,0.00074649794,0.0007947372,0.0046291007,0.0008027752,0.0022365714,0.0018929626,0.0020179101,0.022751933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22238074,0.0004553452,0.0010770613,0.0072848075,0.001819135,0.0028674777,0.0016958524,0.0019351486,0.0045129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008268821,0.0011615738,0.6057751,0.005967253,0.0018914265,0.000090845715,0.0030724343,0.00039106852,0.0006651028,0.012259348,0.040247627,0.32765132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020906594,0.0007706521,0.81231034,0.0051379064,0.001112768,0.00023710437,0.0050156354,0.0010175364,0.001428562,0.008490665,0.16414592,0.00012382897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016606862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033337645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9373989,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001159291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021454727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33107024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900625922","doi":"10.1017/xps.2018.21","title":"Service Representation in a Federal System: A Field Experiment","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Representation (politics); Service (business); Field (mathematics); Work (physics); Set (abstract data type); Public administration; Political science; Public relations; Sample (material); Federal jurisdiction; Federal court; Law; Business; Politics; Computer science; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.0662367332729878,"score_gpt":0.43995896208596164,"score_spread":0.37372222881297384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900625922","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941024,0.000009164577,0.00037529657,0.0001972007,0.000019495074,0.001341083,0.00016558332,0.000023610735,0.0037660955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99115175,0.000017420278,0.0018791478,0.00031309004,0.000043158092,0.0031325105,0.0002157413,0.0000091307365,0.0032380444],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.98306745,0.010902628,0.0005437508,0.0013304903,0.0017467628,0.0024088756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9575303,0.022469206,0.006015761,0.0063679386,0.0036766827,0.003940162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152015425,0.00079962745,0.00084564456,0.0010683037,0.007960259,0.0024199625,0.0019979759,0.0024002334,0.0080853775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031479295,0.00074140274,0.0004829282,0.0013877163,0.0052382755,0.0020991296,0.0019052142,0.0027122395,0.0009556919],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08873549,0.44489127,0.19629593,0.00092526467,0.00046992136,0.0007560972,0.07450375,0.008474402,0.037538826,0.023955952,0.020624565,0.1028286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031162046,0.19536406,0.60254794,0.00026620363,0.0005700718,0.00019407179,0.07055165,0.029421851,0.016162902,0.012851474,0.04017776,0.0007300476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1553463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1770009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1553463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0113481665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01020588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3088842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972563400","doi":"10.1017/xps.2019.24","title":"Open for Politics? Globalization, Economic Growth, and Responsibility Attribution","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Blame; Openness to experience; Politics; Economics; Credence; CLARITY; Empirical evidence; Attribution; Globalization; Affect (linguistics); Information asymmetry; Public economics; Monetary economics; Development economics; Market economy; Political science; Social psychology; Psychology; Microeconomics; Law","score_opus":0.0497631683858168,"score_gpt":0.4277105751268896,"score_spread":0.3779474067410728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972563400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94076365,0.0001251249,0.0009343637,0.0019566242,0.00002303818,0.00003474613,0.000052119944,0.000009282903,0.056101162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99917954,0.000035358116,0.000095784184,0.000053092535,0.0000036980657,0.0000061268065,0.000013925495,0.0000022940753,0.00061016897],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655354,0.0019048952,0.00010192329,0.00029579632,0.0005032668,0.00064060465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9593928,0.022209289,0.009798024,0.0030789787,0.0026764118,0.0028443993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009309006,0.00023323145,0.0004707638,0.0011707442,0.002615374,0.0040378454,0.00040644812,0.001024063,0.011514009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032089353,0.0001849381,0.00023966265,0.0011485695,0.0080885105,0.002181012,0.0024422328,0.0016694791,0.00037598892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008882537,0.0012486387,0.78681386,0.00018419768,0.00012752722,0.00035746442,0.047832865,0.0025503489,0.0016286414,0.09667862,0.0031194543,0.058570128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011848124,0.00014848993,0.8543935,0.00015523753,0.00007010569,0.00011198274,0.05128052,0.0029583387,0.0008790813,0.07724193,0.012558686,0.00008347143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02361694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033986732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02361694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003128829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025644312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04923135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041660699","doi":"10.1017/xps.2020.25","title":"How to Survey Citizens’ Compliance with COVID-19 Public Health Measures: Evidence from Three Survey Experiments","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"COVID-19 epidemiological studies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Toronto; McGill University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Social distance; Context (archaeology); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Public health; Psychology; Preamble; Public relations; Survey data collection; Distancing; Social psychology; Norm (philosophy); Pandemic; Political science; Public economics; Business; Medicine; Economics; Computer science; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Nursing; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.8046897437502686,"score_gpt":0.5361540133737008,"score_spread":0.26853573037656775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041660699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856882,0.0002853905,0.006385072,0.0009679666,0.00015680552,0.0015971481,0.00063840277,0.000040796196,0.0042402167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885133,0.00022247422,0.006281664,0.0007358911,0.00005933418,0.0026875737,0.00046371986,0.000015085154,0.0010209015],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89164126,0.09863197,0.0031521185,0.0024246692,0.003256634,0.00089341204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4258665,0.4930415,0.03837721,0.032654297,0.008074031,0.0019864028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.102751985,0.0006188387,0.0009362298,0.00051536516,0.0009703781,0.0019967365,0.0013056335,0.0030693146,0.005023616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19481595,0.0006608989,0.0015770872,0.00087908964,0.003105611,0.0022860712,0.0013382356,0.0023558873,0.0010456578],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1031181,0.1710177,0.43189088,0.0070322086,0.011327986,0.00030852834,0.020481624,0.013625586,0.012439452,0.014561955,0.011402707,0.20279324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025561925,0.2651515,0.5532683,0.002127371,0.007984424,0.00033863226,0.011159418,0.039863404,0.034639206,0.027987303,0.031001968,0.000916487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003019887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002130559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102751985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013354523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001121904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5434109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110009843","doi":"10.1017/xps.2020.34","title":"Through Their Own Eyes: The Implications of COVID-19 for PhD Students","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Andrew W. Mellon Foundation; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Psychology; Virology; Medicine; Outbreak; Internal medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.5460216838746788,"score_gpt":0.6434052698390339,"score_spread":0.09738358596435515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110009843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24630114,0.002549835,0.0015321327,0.6676891,0.0033041656,0.00007600722,0.00020940964,0.00006283499,0.07827541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8888627,0.0016792763,0.00088039285,0.09100933,0.0010302213,0.00010412282,0.000054634573,0.000056490488,0.01632281],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9662298,0.023437781,0.00073658064,0.0012331406,0.0038828861,0.0044798898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89432514,0.049776923,0.009208047,0.004044308,0.011685629,0.030959895],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031964906,0.00029958008,0.0004832881,0.00092150917,0.016361848,0.011637638,0.0017939592,0.005501262,0.027187603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10350586,0.00034460032,0.0006586108,0.0009347168,0.009995865,0.0076859747,0.011371301,0.008914754,0.0031892068],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003117202,0.0006198008,0.07826905,0.0007079563,0.000064299995,0.0027375806,0.4183471,0.00019349871,0.0014171561,0.055628836,0.30278513,0.13891798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004521062,0.00019739091,0.019631794,0.0007821419,0.000020194775,0.0005788544,0.7980581,0.00013941772,0.00047041682,0.015008794,0.16498491,0.00008281665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050717387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012689389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004409651,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013816523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16904867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122608349","doi":"10.1017/xps.2020.42","title":"When Do Politicians Pursue More Policy Information?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Parliament; Viewpoints; Conversation; Political science; Public relations; Variety (cybernetics); Position (finance); Opinion leadership; Politics; Sociology; Business; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.031297625792909255,"score_gpt":0.4083306599487641,"score_spread":0.3770330341558549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122608349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9793464,0.00010480381,0.00027031283,0.0017800395,0.000031522537,0.000065480745,0.00005562761,0.000012666595,0.018333117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976197,0.00007107268,0.00027477887,0.0004743935,0.000018500237,0.000035891942,0.000038049984,0.000005804737,0.0014618656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99213797,0.0042527947,0.00028813348,0.00068742223,0.0013530881,0.0012806114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573296,0.029522989,0.006932203,0.001870801,0.0014662443,0.0028782645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009041219,0.00025995757,0.00059541076,0.0010445835,0.0027865241,0.003943786,0.0005849492,0.0028663913,0.009776335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05649763,0.0005380602,0.00026175348,0.0008551792,0.0022490495,0.001962911,0.0010629173,0.0023184305,0.0010078725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011560492,0.008455965,0.68406314,0.0010643074,0.0003331681,0.0015619886,0.10519615,0.0018110764,0.034984894,0.022866767,0.009914109,0.11818798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014769359,0.002732002,0.840247,0.00040689652,0.00021160478,0.00038170262,0.08961471,0.0052054827,0.0046447334,0.0137478225,0.041094724,0.0002365079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037253886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053037006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037253886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022580181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028505193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07407409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3128686117","doi":"10.1017/xps.2020.47","title":"Self-Efficacy and Citizen Engagement in Development: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Microfinance and Financial Inclusion","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Tanzania; Public relations; Corporate governance; Intervention (counseling); Political science; Public involvement; Self-efficacy; Civic engagement; Public good; Public engagement; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Socioeconomics; Sociology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.054892076816506104,"score_gpt":0.30164848333384303,"score_spread":0.24675640651733693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128686117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99811494,0.00007902276,0.00016853189,0.00010213382,0.0000041379662,0.0001185952,0.000038785663,0.0000030489864,0.0013707675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990701,0.00006537735,0.00032589352,0.00005811501,0.000003961491,0.00017833937,0.000025312653,0.0000017839772,0.000271183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954731,0.0036050614,0.00013784428,0.0002591993,0.0002633951,0.00026127486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9527091,0.037828963,0.0044871173,0.0027556363,0.0012711196,0.00094808906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009886318,0.00035970818,0.00042960572,0.0005229115,0.0012660453,0.0010192945,0.0007036311,0.00059772376,0.005491123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016829459,0.00029133147,0.0003822768,0.0004998809,0.0029023478,0.0007328144,0.0010956388,0.0009285454,0.0003261325],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028189376,0.15939721,0.5041037,0.004059181,0.001110641,0.0018938605,0.08999991,0.004142655,0.021437515,0.016361395,0.0043513887,0.16495314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009194731,0.07586865,0.8370207,0.0013919565,0.001144663,0.00034660762,0.03867405,0.0060732383,0.01234141,0.007982825,0.009795221,0.00016581338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060666436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067525045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009886318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001051967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009962122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05228448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149734370","doi":"10.1017/xps.2021.10","title":"All in This Together? A Preregistered Report on Deservingness of Government Aid During the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Cash; Pandemic; Redistribution (election); Government (linguistics); Cash transfers; Economics; Similarity (geometry); Public economics; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Finance; Politics; Computer science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.15561965011530327,"score_gpt":0.4904432004371368,"score_spread":0.33482355032183353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149734370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96317554,0.00019489232,0.00024504375,0.017248992,0.0002100673,0.0002855022,0.0010347356,0.000027463742,0.017577762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98899174,0.00016630265,0.00032613124,0.0031945077,0.00011879539,0.000193887,0.00020249253,0.000009981955,0.0067961086],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615353,0.0022765705,0.00014973126,0.00022026812,0.0006887526,0.0005111049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637547,0.019931886,0.0043985923,0.0034196542,0.0057302956,0.0027648392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010884356,0.00018083367,0.00026565875,0.0006274305,0.0038501443,0.0016013264,0.0006894847,0.0018227163,0.0070384922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0266594,0.00022629365,0.00017998715,0.0006453358,0.0019615027,0.0006375903,0.0011582534,0.0019517555,0.000662473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009191264,0.012612956,0.5871844,0.000531124,0.00019786689,0.0025179116,0.06656006,0.0016097461,0.020477079,0.030262327,0.13410962,0.13474575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041021928,0.009791703,0.8453972,0.00022190533,0.00013040962,0.00030911513,0.05540997,0.0008628112,0.015449944,0.0022072268,0.06960119,0.00020829008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06333393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13010785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06333393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053343275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005595619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12593055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3169572094","doi":"10.1017/xps.2021.9","title":"Labor Market Volatility, Gender, and Trade Preferences","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Volatility (finance); Economics; Wage; Economic stability; Labour economics; International economics; Psychology; Macroeconomics; Financial economics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0911720580694827,"score_gpt":0.28263977908940785,"score_spread":0.19146772101992515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3169572094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99516124,0.000107916836,0.00009036148,0.0003211721,0.000007440184,0.0000031652373,0.000054847744,0.0000010535924,0.004252772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965334,0.00002459871,0.000010690805,0.00003258231,0.000006123991,0.0000010566106,0.000017313892,5.561472e-7,0.00025378846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958366,0.00017668727,0.00002143141,0.00004642514,0.000090053625,0.00008164612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99491775,0.0026499438,0.0014653365,0.00023847536,0.00021819629,0.0005103224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012335429,0.00009933415,0.00017217807,0.0004893918,0.0003985186,0.0012842054,0.00013217967,0.0003680938,0.0064531234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005158257,0.00007147604,0.00014808057,0.00040497282,0.00058867276,0.00040553222,0.0003626307,0.00036741525,0.00037434607],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049459824,0.00026243177,0.9721653,0.000027994374,0.000066804074,0.00016437664,0.0036311536,0.00046596996,0.0015661292,0.0051833354,0.00071437657,0.015257586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018751702,0.0001527641,0.9808714,0.0000321914,0.000018195462,0.00012788373,0.00954282,0.0010103554,0.0004938232,0.005870801,0.0018439913,0.000017183127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016409969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018246338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064531234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027815107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014553456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021587849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211190947","doi":"10.1017/xps.2021.26","title":"Discriminatory Immigration Bans Elicit Anti-Americanism in Targeted Communities: Evidence from Nigerian Expatriates","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Public opinion; Political science; Representation (politics); Intervention (counseling); Foreign policy; Immigration policy; Public policy; Development economics; Demographic economics; Psychology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.03716486664304134,"score_gpt":0.3671485272708367,"score_spread":0.3299836606277953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211190947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993438,0.0000351347,0.000014231609,0.000038728827,0.0000032150328,0.000007992664,0.0000095208225,1.993625e-7,0.00054713135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991411,0.00011795593,0.0000507282,0.0001331594,0.000006037497,0.00002374544,0.000018602424,6.1629e-7,0.000507974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898225,0.00058721047,0.000042552074,0.000094770156,0.0001369467,0.00015630813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954619,0.0018573806,0.0013185568,0.00022506942,0.00062690064,0.00051015633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018517112,0.00029230243,0.00033377734,0.00056922523,0.0026647663,0.0013343552,0.00027950818,0.0010561515,0.003811647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005553205,0.00034183805,0.00019731274,0.0004517191,0.0013389572,0.00046968044,0.0010954739,0.0009822994,0.00053943874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077670603,0.003201457,0.88383144,0.00021148696,0.00006968781,0.0007087903,0.094254956,0.000044707936,0.005411609,0.00024817794,0.00045569034,0.010785305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000367767,0.001252341,0.7993721,0.0001408282,0.000054372606,0.0004400615,0.195359,0.000114315975,0.0014715501,0.00021328784,0.0015195932,0.000025708476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007600793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013908042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007600793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034376213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050050643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015113115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292237137","doi":"10.1017/xps.2022.15","title":"Objectified and Dehumanized: Does Objectification Impact Perceptions of Women Political Candidates?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Objectification; Politics; Perception; Social psychology; Psychology; Gender studies; Sociology; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.01795694153699694,"score_gpt":0.3602959195716442,"score_spread":0.34233897803464725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292237137","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944859,0.000041335923,0.00021950423,0.0003077512,0.000013114167,0.000014464665,0.000010033485,0.0000027875828,0.0049051335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991605,0.000025452759,0.00013261476,0.00006181085,0.0000057813368,0.000026540967,0.000006276564,0.0000023794767,0.00057866325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619377,0.002515999,0.000114301976,0.00031788665,0.000558067,0.00030007996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98177505,0.011379082,0.0042802636,0.0010331654,0.000522536,0.0010099191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004024951,0.0002838122,0.00035998193,0.00038585422,0.0011191943,0.0028824308,0.00038555733,0.0010028654,0.009423978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021329096,0.00024008965,0.00027769583,0.00025568102,0.0037376103,0.0010906897,0.0015449948,0.0010404711,0.00037216712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010756518,0.01931243,0.5597169,0.0010579488,0.00038874985,0.0011626376,0.19857176,0.0010823455,0.05993038,0.04032186,0.0018308817,0.10586767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046007,0.008309938,0.85322404,0.00036281938,0.00029995496,0.00043008834,0.093854025,0.0018867591,0.014268421,0.017313065,0.009453159,0.0001375492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089152466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011050365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009423978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072984817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066418556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031526327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386833686","doi":"10.1017/xps.2023.24","title":"Assessing the Validity of Prevalence Estimates in Double List Experiments","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"American Political Science Association","keywords":"Identification (biology); Variance (accounting); Estimator; Econometrics; Computer science; Population; Frontier; Social desirability bias; Psychology; Sensitivity (control systems); Data science; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Geography; Social desirability; Economics; Sociology; Engineering; Demography","score_opus":0.32898889808531834,"score_gpt":0.5234984095083213,"score_spread":0.19450951142300293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386833686","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35537434,0.00049212505,0.63348716,0.0016652409,0.00029997513,0.0017541863,0.00063488743,0.00031953544,0.0059726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90701234,0.000096716634,0.08949926,0.0004460583,0.000098125376,0.0020577977,0.0002443213,0.000035983543,0.0005093594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.6916833,0.2731602,0.008069917,0.012178688,0.013020888,0.0018869755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.057262987,0.8913405,0.020921066,0.024830926,0.0051845554,0.00045999227],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.29478058,0.0010714552,0.0020985892,0.002503887,0.0016088753,0.0036957578,0.0037146448,0.0044257278,0.006409804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.68857557,0.0012548855,0.0024392097,0.0022469019,0.0095084775,0.007932161,0.0055257706,0.0041786036,0.0005912165],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011884014,0.003509834,0.30875444,0.0032970784,0.0045119384,0.0006571754,0.008782383,0.05815852,0.0063103517,0.3385517,0.003940391,0.2516422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003525865,0.01144435,0.09470897,0.0013801377,0.001864497,0.0008419412,0.003587746,0.4608632,0.015057455,0.3982119,0.007975655,0.00053829665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012708609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073761586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7052194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001840469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015436478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8696611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386833736","doi":"10.1017/xps.2023.26","title":"Recognition probability in legislative bargaining","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiteit van Amsterdam; York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Legislature; Preference; Economics; Probability model; Econometrics; Microeconomics; Statistics; Political science; Mathematics; Law","score_opus":0.09532059939449421,"score_gpt":0.3013719644194658,"score_spread":0.20605136502497157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386833736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8412459,0.00046131268,0.030229408,0.0025699302,0.00014443861,0.00015082309,0.00008459425,0.00008088168,0.12503271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967506,0.00005157883,0.0010941316,0.0001742759,0.000051389212,0.000040847062,0.000016497599,0.000008069971,0.0018127133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98787385,0.007370303,0.0004718638,0.0011425869,0.0022413104,0.0009001407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231044,0.053524356,0.0136458045,0.00555061,0.0020380663,0.0021367308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014684841,0.00040343654,0.00090234604,0.00068759295,0.0010835553,0.0028906956,0.00082175847,0.0023042448,0.019183753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061827414,0.0003144026,0.0004959487,0.00065801165,0.0036915042,0.002853823,0.0017542829,0.0028972519,0.0013241487],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004481442,0.0019683633,0.06850427,0.0004485123,0.00019581639,0.0005117774,0.0031392279,0.027233358,0.020585945,0.76582474,0.004493461,0.10261308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076722447,0.0037292305,0.11233397,0.00014676386,0.00018109666,0.00064640585,0.0019135074,0.05877298,0.009227223,0.7987348,0.0133892605,0.00015761841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004084734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002832302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019183753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015418511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092437805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07766181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391259425","doi":"10.1017/xps.2023.39","title":"Incentivizing Responses in International Organization Elite Surveys: Evidence from the World Bank","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Texas at Austin","keywords":"Incentive; Elite; Voucher; Donation; Population; Control (management); Work (physics); Public economics; Public relations; Business; Psychology; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Economic growth; Politics; Sociology; Microeconomics; Demography; Management","score_opus":0.07132269725714258,"score_gpt":0.41567675234105034,"score_spread":0.34435405508390776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391259425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9527386,0.0016358858,0.002766246,0.005893335,0.00019185535,0.00052284705,0.00053623924,0.00008242008,0.035632536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961856,0.0005882656,0.0008325858,0.0010223845,0.000078579,0.00027240234,0.000113800714,0.000010358881,0.00089601043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.90279746,0.08770126,0.0016905018,0.0015524712,0.0041406336,0.0021176927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5394323,0.36164427,0.059441566,0.021940691,0.011471907,0.0060693217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08627817,0.00044123316,0.0005474542,0.0011427614,0.0012141024,0.0022579774,0.0010105511,0.0020665978,0.007225194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17510232,0.0004083266,0.00042774845,0.0020217337,0.0029536563,0.0017082366,0.0018521133,0.0017038714,0.0011441833],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019405957,0.014058227,0.58146334,0.0023173434,0.0013459701,0.00021816653,0.009991451,0.003479917,0.0011881816,0.014636391,0.023985006,0.32791004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033604926,0.009508505,0.91778517,0.0019006483,0.00083721743,0.0001282775,0.007456571,0.0051821982,0.0027567667,0.0075684027,0.043377288,0.00013853713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004994418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035785576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08627817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015649489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015998161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45628804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393434682","doi":"10.1017/xps.2024.3","title":"Public Responses to Unilateral Policymaking","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Unilateralism; Accountability; Presidential system; Politics; Political science; Public opinion; Presidential campaign; Public relations; Law and economics; Public administration; Positive economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.14975207879444652,"score_gpt":0.47212554918854466,"score_spread":0.32237347039409814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393434682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9522462,0.000100312645,0.0026743268,0.0030806155,0.00012844826,0.00009559493,0.00015454886,0.00006121845,0.041458722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987859,0.000021320973,0.00021486773,0.0002769298,0.000028961063,0.000044481203,0.000022194083,0.0000043883497,0.000601032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97961617,0.014453789,0.0008304914,0.0011547299,0.0025146003,0.0014301632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87349206,0.077778615,0.031874526,0.010822724,0.0042530666,0.001779091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016162742,0.0003430131,0.00048865995,0.00065761764,0.0011662174,0.0023181117,0.00037378902,0.0020484438,0.0077843214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.078812726,0.0002649101,0.00036196393,0.0006461608,0.002014483,0.0009915238,0.0020520866,0.0024485898,0.0007132466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009355673,0.0048008175,0.4187328,0.0017370584,0.0008258231,0.001234764,0.042385366,0.013375986,0.093557954,0.18369764,0.0152156195,0.21508047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092197757,0.0040177987,0.66723925,0.00053572486,0.00051968073,0.00046429096,0.038456935,0.02871232,0.047699645,0.17603359,0.03503232,0.0003664999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066972023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057360105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016162742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016978201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007768876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08547777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413690326","doi":"10.1017/xps.2025.10011","title":"How Language Shapes Belief in Misinformation: A Study Among Multilinguals in Ukraine","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Charles Koch Foundation; Craig Newmark Philanthropies; York University; John S. and James L. Knight Foundation","keywords":"Misinformation; Psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Computer science; Philosophy; Computer security","score_opus":0.021004207575134732,"score_gpt":0.4055066959357843,"score_spread":0.3845024883606496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413690326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99979347,0.000012667646,0.0000064460673,0.000015242169,4.945759e-7,0.0000017506735,0.0000066592297,2.1514079e-7,0.00016305968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99971074,0.000021006193,0.000014863935,0.000021410046,6.930943e-7,0.0000028965621,0.000011001311,6.6900685e-7,0.00021667598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993697,0.00024205407,0.00003482344,0.00009011278,0.00009627446,0.00016711121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977451,0.0007552221,0.00070445915,0.00013855513,0.0002596133,0.0003969552],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001053774,0.00022025139,0.00048537253,0.00055166753,0.0020719978,0.0020007333,0.0003306608,0.00049476355,0.0024709206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028602893,0.00036174367,0.00034940362,0.00048433727,0.0009829651,0.00063328503,0.0011235185,0.00096985267,0.00036817667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034876086,0.0012283877,0.83942354,0.00003744851,0.000052923297,0.000565581,0.15053526,0.000040692947,0.0017520139,0.00025616903,0.00016548067,0.005593656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017119735,0.0004888528,0.86626047,0.000036119196,0.00003908147,0.00026222388,0.13117643,0.0002614862,0.00040385916,0.000113996626,0.0009217485,0.000018725797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046121918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056828298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046121918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001179498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010500996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09170693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413893935","doi":"10.1017/xps.2025.10015","title":"Misinformation Among Migrants: Evidence from Mexico and Colombia","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.026705117511643946,"score_gpt":0.3816942796040138,"score_spread":0.35498916209236986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413893935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99493045,0.0010415016,0.000044595185,0.00048813768,0.000015449737,0.000042809497,0.00022912143,0.0000024409092,0.003205478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975133,0.0014797468,0.0000940539,0.00018283546,0.000015062666,0.000042181207,0.00018410698,0.0000022882678,0.00048646974],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925774,0.0004225802,0.00003978147,0.00007813288,0.000082045684,0.00011970205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468476,0.0023762584,0.0017994748,0.00026080167,0.00058044866,0.00029827465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015076689,0.00029794453,0.00042334487,0.0010780735,0.0016515101,0.0014264949,0.00043122377,0.0005642263,0.003630546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006937538,0.00016560934,0.00021367555,0.0009822751,0.0010610188,0.00063684944,0.0011015875,0.000654876,0.00015425935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018201211,0.0013282971,0.85932267,0.0026880195,0.00024954716,0.0013362037,0.06806549,0.00014753784,0.0008679835,0.001408443,0.003350767,0.05941494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001343099,0.00045162413,0.8993628,0.001074675,0.00022272496,0.00035809586,0.08768169,0.00018191637,0.00042092244,0.00021173646,0.009865916,0.00003350662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.082468554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095900066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.082468554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013797961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012794032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16397709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415584694","doi":"10.1017/xps.2025.10023","title":"Expressive Responding and the Economy: The Case of Trump’s Return to Office","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Political Science","topic":"Electoral Systems and Political Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Unemployment; Quarter (Canadian coin); Perception; Recession; Non-response bias; Survey data collection; Panel data","score_opus":0.031030757058423983,"score_gpt":0.4029305164214172,"score_spread":0.3718997593629932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415584694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8872425,0.000119381475,0.0018577173,0.015389447,0.00016248536,0.000068407026,0.000044043907,0.000020308702,0.09509573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975612,0.00002241354,0.00022696947,0.00086461194,0.000040443298,0.00003344813,0.000006972421,0.000009047947,0.0012350006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860545,0.011060924,0.00025788703,0.0005802984,0.0010953819,0.0009510174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9314984,0.050196428,0.0075170607,0.006092264,0.002227139,0.0024687604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018560154,0.0001358844,0.00031920115,0.000645513,0.0022215543,0.0025855482,0.00076772505,0.0017531744,0.009169843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079372644,0.00018570747,0.00021855274,0.0006144412,0.0038547958,0.0018517597,0.0022330498,0.0027078218,0.00046194147],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053333305,0.004334876,0.2494003,0.00030432802,0.00018388587,0.0029172837,0.11256736,0.002287567,0.008551445,0.39954406,0.028197905,0.1863776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006767304,0.0024014704,0.49403718,0.00032627507,0.00015675301,0.0010367008,0.15679719,0.009365738,0.007041445,0.22083494,0.10709648,0.00022913252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001646712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022031656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018560154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015176985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007023404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09815669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}