{"meta":{"query_hash":"73504e01f37d","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition"},"cohort_total":295,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":295,"exported":295,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/73504e01f37d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Experimental+Psychology+Learning+Memory+and+Cognition"},"results":[{"id":"W1499982274","doi":"10.1037/a0029180","title":"Modulation of additive and interactive effects in lexical decision by trial history.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Cognition; Stimulus (psychology); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.022967973170179738,"score_gpt":0.35873414481985105,"score_spread":0.3357661716496713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499982274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9667331,0.0005577098,0.02987849,0.00006294017,0.00007006012,0.00015315942,0.00018081939,0.00031518654,0.0020484806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98760533,0.00008780316,0.010730684,0.000058112873,0.000026398258,0.00016420597,0.00016248884,0.00021365436,0.0009514241],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486154,0.0019803634,0.0004468,0.0013890021,0.0011193285,0.0002029486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9325799,0.054669894,0.0047571994,0.0058589717,0.00096361595,0.0011705277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066729,0.0005569033,0.0011565665,0.0007527733,0.00023967659,0.0013121783,0.0009800849,0.0005843059,0.003399219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04123539,0.00080693513,0.0007320861,0.0005172643,0.0011157098,0.0011989841,0.001395642,0.0013031109,0.0003545379],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012512497,0.0012251165,0.05252095,0.00075616146,0.00091789337,0.00026073918,0.0010832464,0.0044201445,0.8635773,0.0026928673,0.0002261926,0.059806887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039496596,0.007044566,0.7376907,0.000054346543,0.0014008154,0.000796914,0.00016727898,0.058511373,0.1818225,0.01049272,0.0013844783,0.00023932672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006550467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011318808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039881465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041145744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035290122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1803113185","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000137","title":"Recognition without awareness: Encoding and retrieval factors.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Fluency; Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Two-alternative forced choice; Recognition memory; Perception; Selection (genetic algorithm); Word recognition; Kaleidoscope; Social psychology; Cognition; Reading (process); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.1492886246026561,"score_gpt":0.38331735691959246,"score_spread":0.23402873231693636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1803113185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882532,0.00042161497,0.0076341885,0.00010138107,0.000042401352,0.00008927832,0.000045575776,0.000037757494,0.0033746462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749774,0.00011925294,0.0016355253,0.00004979164,0.000022221546,0.000033647197,0.00007813344,0.000017389673,0.0005462547],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798596,0.0005426824,0.00033278565,0.00034436994,0.000648731,0.00014544195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9589869,0.027665708,0.0065074665,0.0041542244,0.0016049065,0.0010807952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031839418,0.0003339209,0.00036021913,0.00055411883,0.00021583293,0.0013407302,0.0004451378,0.0005638626,0.0023825103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029564667,0.00031876113,0.00024171281,0.00022737827,0.0011241817,0.0024962362,0.0013762028,0.0011056956,0.0002514801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010776666,0.003179493,0.18930611,0.0010828297,0.0002574338,0.00091507233,0.004292256,0.00077379175,0.47350982,0.0042795036,0.0006938566,0.3109332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015140772,0.0068973806,0.7520295,0.00011211404,0.0004245104,0.0034669358,0.0011612184,0.0063320817,0.21698491,0.010214995,0.0020574343,0.00016751494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032992964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039368682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031839418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027334614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037231404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016838491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1961852048","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000141","title":"Serial position functions in general knowledge.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Serial position effect; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Position (finance); Competitor analysis; Dimension (graph theory); Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Order (exchange); Psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Combinatorics; Recall; Marketing; Biology; Economics; Business; Evolutionary biology","score_opus":0.07646781067706726,"score_gpt":0.3751913333474927,"score_spread":0.29872352267042546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1961852048","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6738625,0.0058326996,0.18558317,0.0011256797,0.00016448158,0.00011150278,0.0019441155,0.0012548437,0.13012095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734677,0.0009033502,0.017414048,0.00020205331,0.000096924145,0.00008944762,0.00074132235,0.00009261594,0.0069926623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938023,0.00011074669,0.00004748026,0.00024838236,0.00016440357,0.00004868137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912471,0.0053306906,0.001161487,0.0014292719,0.00057956687,0.00025184784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013852662,0.00053391745,0.00042726184,0.0027557295,0.00029939276,0.0022406252,0.0005838981,0.00069913093,0.012847094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130512025,0.00034552222,0.0006172009,0.0019324191,0.0017349801,0.0056029223,0.000802719,0.0008230657,0.0011122036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004870824,0.00020240774,0.03537258,0.0004975248,0.00020060893,0.0009913716,0.001974612,0.009695127,0.016956601,0.5995601,0.0034753522,0.33058658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056005836,0.00034911852,0.1398655,0.00009517333,0.000109667904,0.0021326458,0.00038699442,0.0360645,0.0048413766,0.80690426,0.009111054,0.00008374438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028114845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012990086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012847094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094871124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030515454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04297781},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963855867","doi":"10.1037/a0028474","title":"On the specificity of sequential congruency effects in implicit learning of motor and perceptual sequences.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Xunta de Galicia","keywords":"Sequence learning; Psychology; Perception; Sequence (biology); Implicit learning; Cognitive psychology; Control (management); Communication; Social psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience; Artificial intelligence; Biology; Computer science; Genetics","score_opus":0.04259546436571018,"score_gpt":0.34893254701368104,"score_spread":0.3063370826479709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963855867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900592,0.00028225116,0.0039273584,0.00006160092,0.000025399964,0.000047568512,0.000050420487,0.000030580464,0.005515619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822336,0.00008641274,0.0011678094,0.000031671214,0.000008527314,0.000024411007,0.000039928258,0.000013511221,0.00040439726],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951375,0.00008002485,0.00004116652,0.00014532439,0.00017637004,0.000043510507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996431,0.001827568,0.000895522,0.00040186904,0.00019579884,0.00024826234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008651096,0.00019006777,0.00023002284,0.00037972885,0.000113120295,0.00034828237,0.00025274663,0.0002797588,0.0027561947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074146767,0.00020120954,0.00013642696,0.00021467147,0.0005735945,0.00057334197,0.0006564817,0.00055469474,0.00020059713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026009448,0.00040885,0.019834159,0.00031243337,0.00007555293,0.00013737638,0.00076504174,0.0007915566,0.91970783,0.002998243,0.00015038814,0.05221764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019842642,0.0020290301,0.83957857,0.00005177097,0.00012279427,0.00069187843,0.00023971392,0.0041844626,0.14503683,0.0060265996,0.0017976898,0.000042187836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003565759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005967876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027561947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001917583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026212534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009220421},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966496460","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1050","title":"Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: Support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Distraction; Psychology; Recall; Cognitive psychology; Short-term memory; Echoic memory; Cognition; Context (archaeology); Seriation (archaeology); Repetition (rhetorical device); Speech recognition; Working memory; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04116214849550954,"score_gpt":0.3583370403685717,"score_spread":0.3171748918730622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966496460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9275273,0.0019038428,0.058560334,0.00065864576,0.00017910295,0.00016203611,0.00016973758,0.00033851483,0.010500466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930803,0.0003669356,0.004922932,0.00014966445,0.000029336528,0.000068783665,0.00007324127,0.000017274284,0.0012914113],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965394,0.000031857388,0.00004186304,0.000095022995,0.00012913332,0.000048176396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967643,0.0016521564,0.00039506904,0.00066797726,0.0002640181,0.00025645216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090478075,0.0004436964,0.00041835674,0.0007531629,0.0002650632,0.0010416871,0.0011291913,0.00083297666,0.003976247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039363625,0.0002723472,0.00052081805,0.00024951118,0.001322979,0.0016465223,0.0019629558,0.0007473998,0.00045813798],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033745528,0.00071233243,0.022854853,0.0008874328,0.00027571953,0.0020475173,0.0018399394,0.0021725567,0.8136587,0.04317291,0.00084992824,0.108153515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009866863,0.0058398945,0.39649507,0.00014995006,0.0009370468,0.01190794,0.0011222063,0.05853278,0.37956733,0.13494681,0.009218561,0.00029571404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045501764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044119783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003976247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004846379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040747016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013301909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966707938","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.27.4.958","title":"Measuring automatic retrieval.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Dissociation (chemistry); Psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Implicit memory; Natural language processing; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.0899622316749846,"score_gpt":0.35000265929131213,"score_spread":0.2600404276163275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966707938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7098711,0.008588212,0.23458154,0.00024066394,0.00032507716,0.0012907976,0.0017619613,0.0011060643,0.042234585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92412704,0.0029544842,0.05489852,0.00028195526,0.000141153,0.0009277624,0.0024295507,0.00021740906,0.014022173],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731916,0.00037375378,0.00033018115,0.00042713663,0.0013624826,0.00018730431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931437,0.001960437,0.0014687042,0.0012113223,0.0018332105,0.00038271438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026851213,0.00059381314,0.00041048368,0.0018166527,0.00044696825,0.0010924574,0.00089422154,0.0007288845,0.004542945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007905866,0.00025033136,0.00035525975,0.0011839089,0.0006861871,0.0021226066,0.0012408722,0.0010472304,0.0021519503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005716362,0.0008482466,0.021481505,0.0011020268,0.0001734865,0.00015124607,0.00063620886,0.00031929175,0.8295194,0.0068412535,0.0012607237,0.13709496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106763364,0.0040793745,0.21846713,0.00016869228,0.0002477472,0.00405766,0.00044833808,0.0049467925,0.73072654,0.018586617,0.01795488,0.00020948892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047053164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005581535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004542945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003188915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004914501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015197694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967189533","doi":"10.1037/a0029196","title":"How phonological reductions sometimes help the listener.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Prefix; Phonology; Realization (probability); Verb; Word lists by frequency; Linguistics; Computer science; Speech recognition; Psychology; Mathematics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07177189709428418,"score_gpt":0.3870356531234784,"score_spread":0.3152637560291942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967189533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.865702,0.0034048925,0.053060614,0.012098004,0.00083040586,0.000060818482,0.00020501256,0.00086390506,0.06377432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872097,0.0004457872,0.007856986,0.00073911145,0.00008538194,0.000017374006,0.000086391934,0.00013410512,0.0034250482],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806696,0.0007350505,0.00010267324,0.00047181634,0.0005155466,0.0001079466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927664,0.0045969486,0.00091703155,0.0009203218,0.00048220056,0.0003171037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018624044,0.00041609388,0.0001799482,0.00049463625,0.00043967713,0.0018198253,0.00045025846,0.0016515425,0.005106408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019918542,0.00030186222,0.00020199417,0.00018186148,0.0019614338,0.0028462058,0.0011668813,0.001002427,0.0020007228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025092326,0.0002931213,0.072922684,0.00085201656,0.0002699093,0.005306251,0.020702034,0.00149121,0.3534117,0.05560345,0.014277359,0.47236112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039473447,0.0024134296,0.2214749,0.0006237309,0.0007856778,0.057445828,0.02182502,0.0143616,0.18418533,0.32184866,0.17406344,0.0005776388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044270797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005633402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005106408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001878474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028835947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017082691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968898577","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.581","title":"Pure perceptual-based sequence learning.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural dynamics and brain function","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Sequence (biology); Sequence learning; Perception; Implicit learning; Probabilistic logic; Uncorrelated; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Dimension (graph theory); Perceptual learning; Pattern recognition (psychology); Psychology; Mathematics; Cognition; Combinatorics; Biology; Statistics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.0558059941276275,"score_gpt":0.33486500925434903,"score_spread":0.27905901512672154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968898577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57318574,0.0010486159,0.39804155,0.00026693547,0.00016637797,0.00040084662,0.00029882358,0.00066061097,0.025930462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548753,0.00031689752,0.037110448,0.00011820858,0.000026220203,0.000116189614,0.00021097931,0.000045384277,0.007180367],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955744,0.00007863968,0.000029244848,0.00011929627,0.00017667335,0.000038700327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969902,0.0015614046,0.00037703596,0.0006035731,0.0002722757,0.00019548618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008208065,0.00031930525,0.00031202476,0.0002034002,0.00013299425,0.000665793,0.0006212788,0.0004902591,0.0035281712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007311968,0.0002624957,0.0002604885,0.00018216413,0.0006449122,0.0016692375,0.00061273004,0.00066854426,0.00068266946],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002069055,0.0010643912,0.010096511,0.0012678241,0.0002565224,0.0005950435,0.0003567155,0.036046382,0.38770056,0.08227069,0.0016557098,0.47662058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032348867,0.0035803977,0.03852326,0.00008289871,0.00013906893,0.0029851934,0.00011604571,0.50486076,0.26256704,0.17673402,0.009979663,0.000108098335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004595174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067593524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035281712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003809284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043168996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011802912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969942773","doi":"10.1037/a0016272","title":"Extremely selective attention: Eye-tracking studies of the dynamic allocation of attention to stimulus features in categorization.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Categorization; Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Perception; Eye movement; Eye tracking; Cognition; Selective attention; Visual attention; Neuroscience; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08162823066282499,"score_gpt":0.42533453934480536,"score_spread":0.3437063086819804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969942773","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9442285,0.009401127,0.031942356,0.0011030375,0.0002802313,0.0001479169,0.00040295045,0.00021748224,0.012276317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98200226,0.0019189966,0.012358848,0.0006447535,0.0000952332,0.000084921274,0.00020708251,0.000032768337,0.0026549646],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982375,0.00003448082,0.000012306727,0.000056534926,0.000050248687,0.000022669517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903,0.00053245673,0.00016301784,0.00013153607,0.000097816075,0.00004520518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009405921,0.00016034143,0.00016451062,0.00078735186,0.00023187141,0.00041287878,0.00038182316,0.0007018921,0.0007488532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031896362,0.00021221857,0.0001560621,0.00056005357,0.0005897737,0.0007497525,0.00053550536,0.0009272083,0.00022309026],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008861684,0.0004072844,0.016530953,0.000432784,0.00014153456,0.0006351947,0.0019694658,0.0008418077,0.8192652,0.0049865493,0.0035702388,0.15033273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043282693,0.0015885753,0.7928559,0.00014252376,0.00022591399,0.00470588,0.0007576541,0.012107595,0.13235483,0.028621819,0.026047565,0.00015890397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013499286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018120152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013499286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002765328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013682691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0049743652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970206869","doi":"10.1037/a0037779","title":"Distraction control processes in free recall: Benefits and costs to performance.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Distraction; Psychology; Recall; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Control (management); Priming (agriculture); Implicit memory; Working memory; Developmental psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03169473854110614,"score_gpt":0.31563918603248964,"score_spread":0.2839444474913835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970206869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961515,0.0010358408,0.0019413129,0.000054865053,0.000013266775,0.000014971832,0.00003503028,0.000013278964,0.0007398643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986249,0.0001992498,0.0008688949,0.000021727375,0.000015217212,0.00001859533,0.00004435738,0.0000073616943,0.00019974943],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932945,0.00017487383,0.00006692003,0.00012845428,0.00022997212,0.0000703454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467033,0.0028467774,0.0011281983,0.00078307,0.00017934087,0.00039228305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017244295,0.00043529994,0.00040769085,0.00042120655,0.00015287762,0.0008423361,0.0005562548,0.00045099712,0.0009322979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087535605,0.00028976222,0.00024697348,0.00022518286,0.0005813994,0.00079063635,0.0008453417,0.00047891337,0.00012836535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.021276379,0.0017738735,0.21151644,0.0010835711,0.0011179376,0.0010311824,0.002131493,0.002584043,0.45700967,0.005011085,0.0006549348,0.29480946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003480302,0.005308179,0.8687011,0.00010883613,0.00063568825,0.0021996156,0.0005589998,0.0064841,0.09886182,0.0148599865,0.0018364661,0.00009709626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005121656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060398877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017244295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030673222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003187681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009119809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970976283","doi":"10.1037/a0020604","title":"The production effect in memory: Evidence that distinctiveness underlies the benefit.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Word (group theory); Read aloud; Word list; Task (project management); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Think aloud protocol; Computer science; Production (economics); Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.05564021304652536,"score_gpt":0.3574250430690091,"score_spread":0.3017848300224837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970976283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9687321,0.002021204,0.012921619,0.00084194756,0.00018084889,0.00011539467,0.00017424025,0.00015992236,0.014852701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917216,0.00046071256,0.0054492587,0.00038088672,0.0000930031,0.000052529063,0.0001303777,0.000063960826,0.0016476456],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914885,0.00015874841,0.00006430387,0.00024458667,0.00032164232,0.00006191248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98917013,0.005244534,0.0017597817,0.0025429244,0.00061306276,0.00066958135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018305472,0.0005060266,0.0005430611,0.00043997125,0.0003263919,0.0007308404,0.0007373776,0.0009412456,0.005145134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008969316,0.00042158918,0.00036005914,0.00022310537,0.0011786647,0.0023322406,0.0017603617,0.0014798258,0.0006013385],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006524489,0.0011098507,0.017529553,0.0005959848,0.00023033076,0.0005253236,0.00051133236,0.00022212206,0.8631954,0.0048763864,0.0008172865,0.103861935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010905212,0.010721343,0.4830415,0.00010092999,0.0007864965,0.004911103,0.00026807422,0.0025118706,0.462377,0.029480277,0.004603101,0.0001077381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023378784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040184252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005145134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038342903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003437423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017212212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971643864","doi":"10.1037/a0017012","title":"Context-dependent semantic priming in number naming.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Context (archaeology); Numerical digit; Multiplication (music); Arabic numerals; Computer science; Context effect; Cognition; Psychology; Arithmetic; Mathematics; Word (group theory); Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience; Biology","score_opus":0.037394716654895334,"score_gpt":0.3650791914557531,"score_spread":0.3276844748008578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971643864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.907902,0.0038945246,0.0524469,0.0005042103,0.0005825,0.00032716413,0.00037041333,0.00031783772,0.033654403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96984947,0.000634293,0.026559355,0.00024123747,0.00010332876,0.00018720096,0.00018479816,0.00011632754,0.0021239317],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988237,0.0003317061,0.00006829434,0.0004368194,0.00028783447,0.000051570798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99565625,0.0028336782,0.00060511957,0.000499222,0.00020937677,0.00019637114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016168432,0.0004244903,0.00041716482,0.00041495188,0.00023237201,0.0006721462,0.0006200283,0.00059749075,0.0041733505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010014492,0.0006008739,0.00043347754,0.00027860305,0.00076023326,0.002166994,0.0009928287,0.0010043255,0.00064166373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002963412,0.00027771472,0.0059226034,0.0008492504,0.000059842987,0.00041053246,0.00073473196,0.00068695075,0.9063667,0.01799646,0.00049122825,0.06324053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008998764,0.0053528114,0.2573099,0.00023806213,0.00059612474,0.010047961,0.00049726,0.018843208,0.60634166,0.0798436,0.019747147,0.00028238175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034321295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00058572274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041733505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041245826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003782636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013961196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1972639682","doi":"10.1037/a0013016","title":"The effects of environmental context on recognition memory and claims of remembering.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Recall; Context effect; Cognitive psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Word (group theory); Linguistics; History","score_opus":0.03495730693995017,"score_gpt":0.29494690245261057,"score_spread":0.25998959551266043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972639682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981457,0.0004161713,0.0005637342,0.000017654258,0.000007639086,0.0000065099484,0.000028890907,0.000008621485,0.00080513384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901307,0.00019773799,0.00061152497,0.000014756478,0.000005816322,0.000006187718,0.000043627493,0.000006329365,0.00010097686],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990766,0.00046148783,0.00007952056,0.00015953963,0.00016701633,0.000055822486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925142,0.004892384,0.0011885018,0.00062074733,0.00029074345,0.0004935215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090278854,0.0002805681,0.00028215078,0.00022675218,0.0001508216,0.0006347171,0.00025886536,0.00029919273,0.0010621864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072847516,0.00025257052,0.00013888726,0.00015164979,0.0005683226,0.0005283094,0.00079519214,0.00038923058,0.00010808851],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012531384,0.0006160245,0.18022892,0.0005313393,0.0003847947,0.0009234557,0.001563984,0.00059609534,0.74739,0.0006420417,0.00015006478,0.054441873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072258816,0.0045998585,0.8395036,0.000047981946,0.00032680196,0.0013287745,0.0006216759,0.0013670884,0.15043084,0.0008767855,0.0007574917,0.00006683709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029444997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005951197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0010621864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012853119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001376948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0047744513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975122737","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000092","title":"Deductive updating is not Bayesian.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Probabilistic logic; Counterexample; Deductive reasoning; Probabilistic argumentation; Frequentist probability; Inference; Frequentist inference; Mathematics; Statistical inference; Bayesian probability; Bayesian inference; Psychology; Statistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Discrete mathematics","score_opus":0.20887245434336033,"score_gpt":0.4685886036484083,"score_spread":0.259716149305048,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975122737","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37147784,0.0061790356,0.46643367,0.024143316,0.0009972894,0.0003573417,0.00088943867,0.0012403983,0.12828173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96424806,0.0010233211,0.029582229,0.0014581003,0.00032163365,0.00008125777,0.00033912552,0.000086700624,0.0028595685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927927,0.0022568644,0.0005478673,0.0017843709,0.0023171508,0.00030102013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91936195,0.04745679,0.011703923,0.014187601,0.0059916284,0.001298133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0149573395,0.00042777616,0.00085481134,0.0013202111,0.0007881998,0.0032463013,0.0011800268,0.0016310518,0.007584617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15364696,0.00069225533,0.0008851671,0.001081893,0.0033343437,0.011474015,0.0013455887,0.002947648,0.0011268852],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009721227,0.00039455353,0.037106898,0.0009546948,0.00085495005,0.0002631078,0.0022688785,0.006758685,0.0033914528,0.5930983,0.0076555996,0.34628084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011633455,0.00012357287,0.013646029,0.00011289282,0.00015548678,0.00042177064,0.0002388262,0.013613989,0.0011943087,0.96119153,0.009126112,0.00005912936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017126341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001436157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0149573395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012945813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095288735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07910293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975369768","doi":"10.1037/a0015641","title":"Women match men when learning a spatial skill.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Spatial ability; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Matching (statistics); Spatial cognition; Cognition; Dreyfus model of skill acquisition; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.011820174872847828,"score_gpt":0.2747475323891141,"score_spread":0.2629273575162663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975369768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52524924,0.44402486,0.0051198783,0.0030224314,0.0022404902,0.00024180512,0.002962325,0.00009942423,0.01703949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97237444,0.023173368,0.0013885322,0.0009068778,0.0002640272,0.000061877225,0.0004963393,0.000015397993,0.0013191382],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730885,0.0010757839,0.00035621127,0.0007191738,0.00043804292,0.00010205075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941917,0.004120446,0.0010061405,0.00035273665,0.00018782745,0.0001411773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004948671,0.0004894329,0.0013055451,0.0010469187,0.00027704213,0.0012265303,0.0005046913,0.00094998756,0.004233456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016624268,0.00035509298,0.0026252249,0.0010089484,0.0003442086,0.0007762412,0.0004061878,0.00046019422,0.0004699541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011637706,0.00023447713,0.5514504,0.014903123,0.10377723,0.00063868373,0.0013179953,0.00052850466,0.0022019495,0.0020638711,0.00541763,0.3058285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022717998,0.005362859,0.76974857,0.0039001477,0.16784143,0.001611343,0.002133431,0.0009264294,0.0029048782,0.0063500707,0.036863983,0.00008513475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001481716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032282593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004948671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017401838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024343075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026171386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1975462382","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.27.3.614","title":"Two modes of transfer in artificial grammar learning.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Speech and dialogue systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Analogy; Grammar; Vocabulary; Repetition (rhetorical device); Basis (linear algebra); Natural language processing; Computer science; Transfer of learning; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Transfer (computing); Cognitive science; Psychology; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03329097887757934,"score_gpt":0.32124600960691285,"score_spread":0.2879550307293335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1975462382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6287352,0.001268375,0.26407346,0.006783093,0.00032520675,0.0006940493,0.00030686858,0.0011901129,0.09662367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692485,0.00018615983,0.0238273,0.0003578863,0.00004810062,0.0006460977,0.000094527626,0.000055982433,0.005535469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718696,0.0010633433,0.00011903401,0.00079254893,0.00062091084,0.00021729709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891599,0.0050249076,0.0008237296,0.004187583,0.0004032528,0.0004005793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034538272,0.00050446385,0.0004935878,0.0006690855,0.00038670303,0.00222452,0.0015959541,0.0023822438,0.00723387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025140258,0.00066582445,0.00063728326,0.00028783426,0.0049315766,0.0077740457,0.0054672677,0.0023408772,0.0011980839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011375733,0.0012150899,0.013523169,0.0006949944,0.00020225096,0.00068332517,0.011860123,0.0065886495,0.038359668,0.61201763,0.0035203244,0.31019717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028691578,0.0006318089,0.009030036,0.00006393957,0.000054143642,0.0011379058,0.0010877011,0.025045946,0.013457761,0.94315076,0.0059653567,0.000087779685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024017687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014452035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00723387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006529039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054077804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024199665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976035906","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1019","title":"Why people underestimate y when extrapolating in linear functions.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Statistics Education and Methodologies","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Australian Research Council; Ministère de la Défense Nationale","keywords":"Extrapolation; Zero (linguistics); Function (biology); Population; Minor (academic); Linear relationship; Mathematics; Statistics; Econometrics; Humanities; Philosophy; Demography; Sociology","score_opus":0.12812918839730417,"score_gpt":0.4357449023451839,"score_spread":0.3076157139478798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976035906","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86884534,0.003616372,0.0947729,0.012777575,0.00043815435,0.00010650776,0.0003073016,0.0010789935,0.018056838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97315335,0.00084261125,0.019786816,0.0030514505,0.00007967452,0.00007418858,0.00018073177,0.00011457299,0.00271662],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663097,0.0013212666,0.000205075,0.00069120794,0.0009919791,0.00015960813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975071,0.015390564,0.003721075,0.0027357114,0.0026523897,0.00042917542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006792373,0.0005860489,0.00055991265,0.0010480508,0.0004448347,0.0017379466,0.0007739518,0.0021350374,0.002646114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07748544,0.00066969026,0.00067703,0.00057002116,0.0021362556,0.0044487617,0.001197773,0.0019729394,0.0013429763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030468407,0.0003462644,0.47093782,0.000852887,0.0010562941,0.0015935402,0.02405172,0.008888167,0.03430446,0.025278643,0.027638283,0.40200508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034324103,0.0013469004,0.6769759,0.00073629856,0.00053931284,0.006389899,0.013843503,0.071719594,0.03183405,0.17120315,0.024554241,0.0005139454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022138667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018656738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006792373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004270874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025757065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03592187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977345729","doi":"10.1037/a0029122","title":"The processing advantage and disadvantage for homophones in lexical decision tasks.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Western University","keywords":"Homophone; Lexical decision task; Psychology; Task (project management); Disadvantage; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Phonology; Natural language processing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.023417366417810545,"score_gpt":0.3903143564210259,"score_spread":0.36689699000321535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977345729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981108,0.0000929873,0.00035761666,0.000032323933,0.000009655782,0.000010079588,0.0000454991,0.000004737811,0.0013363489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982284,0.00009166514,0.0010200607,0.000060032333,0.000008770425,0.000021766025,0.000081653,0.000011873822,0.00047589952],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945956,0.000112378984,0.00006123525,0.00013088349,0.0001784225,0.00005747886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995182,0.0027806736,0.001059452,0.00031301007,0.00023452,0.00043035005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010651017,0.00029894325,0.00025942945,0.00056090695,0.00014558494,0.0006468651,0.00019410004,0.00038828407,0.0025499032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005988959,0.00017706817,0.0001242776,0.00019477728,0.00048650993,0.00074072514,0.0006368771,0.00040769688,0.0001942502],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027701948,0.00037527943,0.117856644,0.00033147473,0.00010303531,0.00135201,0.003056939,0.00009924413,0.83481145,0.0011155705,0.0002578536,0.037870403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007136652,0.001183405,0.9585848,0.000029971026,0.00007160171,0.0021025965,0.0012604547,0.0007227752,0.03362073,0.0017077026,0.0006007755,0.000043918935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000482931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009096646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025499032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012330672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021152545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008530319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978202480","doi":"10.1037/a0021099","title":"The similarities (and familiarities) of pseudowords and extremely high-frequency words: Examining a familiarity-based explanation of the pseudoword effect.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Pseudoword; Semantics (computer science); Psychology; Semantic memory; Cognitive psychology; Semantic similarity; Computer science; Natural language processing; Neuroscience; Cognition","score_opus":0.026470598854719102,"score_gpt":0.29800934120128547,"score_spread":0.2715387423465664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978202480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98692733,0.00011693612,0.010227387,0.00011957591,0.000015116552,0.000036967438,0.000029787743,0.000027166208,0.0024998346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99535036,0.000049676342,0.0042502205,0.00006640415,0.0000052421133,0.000027992208,0.000033440007,0.000010799659,0.00020590174],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990288,0.0005344226,0.00006436179,0.00015633705,0.00017513912,0.000040891417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95998454,0.034360748,0.002370499,0.0020489483,0.0007115292,0.0005237217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018878371,0.00023561451,0.00037819147,0.0004289532,0.00016447392,0.0005251569,0.0005188462,0.0007908925,0.0018098241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030880805,0.00023417223,0.00038961502,0.00025082924,0.00097469415,0.0014680834,0.00075231836,0.0006223417,0.00021448756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011259703,0.0021465207,0.24798362,0.0010292172,0.0007046854,0.002105699,0.0045833834,0.023126082,0.54822403,0.048471503,0.0010543531,0.10931123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081174227,0.0073304777,0.52577364,0.0000865808,0.000594021,0.005398085,0.0017497352,0.1736956,0.16596316,0.115522385,0.0028211745,0.0002533216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004925172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062141236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018878371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028497484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024685907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009984016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979599684","doi":"10.1037/a0024883","title":"Success modulates consolidation of a visuomotor adaptation task.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Motor Control and Adaptation","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Consolidation (business); Psychology; Memory consolidation; Session (web analytics); Task (project management); Motor learning; Cognitive psychology; Adaptation (eye); Motor skill; Computer science; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06874853117310532,"score_gpt":0.3213694550102737,"score_spread":0.2526209238371684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979599684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99818987,0.00013141193,0.0009795675,0.00001386319,0.00000945924,0.00002120802,0.000013676183,0.0000169664,0.0006239918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826485,0.00008273403,0.00076117954,0.0000094527095,0.000005225517,0.00003095377,0.00004909188,0.000014381283,0.0007820646],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996344,0.000077698496,0.000035384975,0.00008903115,0.000096906806,0.000066646724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868506,0.00040669704,0.00033431643,0.00019787751,0.00013996454,0.00023610334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053371646,0.00038341217,0.0004233945,0.0001937829,0.00012739957,0.0004620412,0.00037226133,0.00027401804,0.0016330098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033676736,0.0001467868,0.00016056144,0.00010950837,0.0003680759,0.00040601788,0.00064988615,0.0004296993,0.0002393772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023992332,0.00086932135,0.013924425,0.00018356582,0.00010768301,0.00012829364,0.00067940744,0.00027007528,0.93647784,0.00015794857,0.00009839824,0.044703778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023373276,0.01777764,0.5483729,0.00007710019,0.00024406746,0.00038057106,0.0007210146,0.006194049,0.42309406,0.000980751,0.0018702375,0.000053813157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006256418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016330098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012345884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018909652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005463004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979775243","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.182","title":"Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute of Mental Health; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institute on Aging; National Institutes of Health; Hebrew University of Jerusalem","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Verb; Cognition; Linguistics; Cognitive science; Event (particle physics); Communication; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.031236941161462157,"score_gpt":0.3646342291004431,"score_spread":0.33339728793898094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979775243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9813695,0.0003221237,0.006512355,0.00020400096,0.000029916886,0.000020101728,0.00010690868,0.000038692815,0.011396298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966935,0.00015622242,0.0018675226,0.000060227274,0.000015893118,0.000011788211,0.000066886234,0.000016508868,0.0011113834],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998305,0.00004558797,0.000013636409,0.00004317541,0.000054914126,0.0000121611465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976192,0.0013254633,0.0006691597,0.00013689048,0.00014280668,0.0001064309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042647956,0.00015848564,0.00012386023,0.000233906,0.000104552055,0.00055132003,0.000106135776,0.00021328128,0.0015560738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038574664,0.00011958113,0.00015865134,0.00014203665,0.00030764303,0.00044816133,0.00034671553,0.00026485,0.00014045065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028023482,0.00034670086,0.15758318,0.00054015755,0.00020965234,0.0017179624,0.0045941113,0.0009841311,0.7002132,0.008140116,0.0008588559,0.122009546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010633221,0.0008170851,0.90527964,0.00006280767,0.00023799493,0.002839548,0.0008245616,0.006248025,0.058756538,0.019346727,0.005429375,0.000051435767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004392586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073115906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015560738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019550126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015388765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0052055717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1982544994","doi":"10.1037/a0019900","title":"Revisiting the novelty effect: When familiarity, not novelty, enhances memory.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":127,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Novelty; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Episodic memory; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Confusion; Cognition; Social psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.035306039221819026,"score_gpt":0.3461804559810315,"score_spread":0.31087441675921246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1982544994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98887604,0.0020870971,0.004197379,0.000490651,0.00012264824,0.000033835586,0.00007312502,0.000066975546,0.004052242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669516,0.0003158266,0.0019967158,0.00025789902,0.000087173205,0.000017108614,0.000049913964,0.000020850975,0.00055933336],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993511,0.00016358972,0.000065854365,0.0001734368,0.00020120174,0.000044837518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994348,0.0029964587,0.001100277,0.00090192247,0.00027262737,0.00038079932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001365236,0.00026700558,0.0003850196,0.00021978817,0.000109757704,0.0005236724,0.00055672583,0.00072054856,0.002033451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006189566,0.00025718342,0.0003085395,0.00012076359,0.0010446034,0.0017453325,0.0007406958,0.0008775276,0.00018816198],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004168763,0.00042911884,0.018161353,0.00055812433,0.00016971047,0.0007988719,0.00038596083,0.00015150131,0.90249985,0.0024781649,0.0004332372,0.0697653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043260344,0.012861622,0.46267962,0.00011708939,0.0006713059,0.005613142,0.00036415574,0.0021520974,0.4997568,0.011137254,0.004126725,0.0000875272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015767378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038118762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002033451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018216833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014319472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0072200894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984085538","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000073","title":"Mistakes as stepping stones: Effects of errors on episodic memory among younger and older adults.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Episodic memory; Memory errors; Developmental psychology; Semantic memory; Declarative memory; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.016230628618532028,"score_gpt":0.30345850628645543,"score_spread":0.2872278776679234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984085538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995734,0.00013940295,0.000028409804,0.000023508639,0.000004922085,0.000005733044,0.000031313106,0.0000016685875,0.0001916915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994241,0.00006938405,0.00006051404,0.000040640807,0.000007263135,0.000009441707,0.00004220276,0.000001783476,0.0003447013],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948394,0.000088718065,0.000083865794,0.00012555573,0.00014375446,0.00007408043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932627,0.0026381246,0.0019915577,0.00036140654,0.0006983781,0.0010478419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015693951,0.00032635208,0.00046770688,0.0005625367,0.00030867103,0.0008211601,0.00028815994,0.000687043,0.0019500101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009309397,0.00023796223,0.00033568102,0.00020914376,0.0004245773,0.0009902886,0.0008308055,0.0007261767,0.00040348616],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0076528313,0.0026807187,0.92521286,0.00012945756,0.00023976366,0.0005848082,0.011333489,0.00010155322,0.010518079,0.00009727247,0.00034333018,0.041105773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031956897,0.001899184,0.9953041,0.000010282599,0.000059831702,0.00016039779,0.0014141352,0.000115114024,0.00073812745,0.00008825282,0.00016889519,0.00000967792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026274708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034349423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026274708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019709009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020259347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008299828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984959010","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.272","title":"The Origin of Exemplar Effects in Rule-Driven Categorization.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Categorization; Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.01698357968965014,"score_gpt":0.3276295278639505,"score_spread":0.31064594817430036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984959010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9174002,0.003453855,0.048313513,0.0014220574,0.00021214514,0.00011555072,0.00017641827,0.0003399828,0.028566286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923396,0.0003777159,0.0061241533,0.00024509325,0.00002465226,0.000025314755,0.00004603633,0.000053873995,0.00076364016],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992248,0.0001812545,0.000043030086,0.00016299663,0.00033367734,0.00005436183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98925716,0.0069685015,0.0011233502,0.0015372626,0.0007408737,0.00037284745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015798904,0.0002267098,0.00036715736,0.00040577413,0.00021181606,0.00086483284,0.0006241094,0.00076035684,0.0021919508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014935268,0.0003712318,0.00035307047,0.00014022182,0.0018220545,0.001332513,0.0009042805,0.001122346,0.00029309076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011108716,0.00036449145,0.015847236,0.00059885945,0.00014810462,0.0007855472,0.0014929647,0.0010930569,0.7921379,0.047468726,0.0010083924,0.13794385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002843828,0.0014087809,0.22209826,0.00016762415,0.00032374778,0.004826483,0.00065732375,0.011010277,0.55259836,0.19570877,0.010739591,0.00017638123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035500346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032196622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021919508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042954084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018918722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008355379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986822158","doi":"10.1037/a0022309","title":"The effects of concurrent verbal and visual tasks on category learning.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Nonverbal communication; Cognitive psychology; Working memory; Task (project management); Verbal memory; Executive functions; Cognition; Verbal learning; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.022217085282595583,"score_gpt":0.3256383672960817,"score_spread":0.3034212820134861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986822158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927804,0.00058184174,0.0016412429,0.000070376096,0.00009531716,0.000057180998,0.00014976058,0.00008093985,0.0045430516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919304,0.00040866874,0.004093358,0.00013504525,0.000035755354,0.00023817441,0.0002590003,0.00009535243,0.0028042295],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976776,0.00050783594,0.0001817149,0.00060548016,0.00079630694,0.00023110314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97746253,0.0147081865,0.0033880274,0.0020402814,0.000715389,0.0016856507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012884543,0.0013573599,0.00048082997,0.0004756586,0.00034416412,0.0014047849,0.0011572515,0.00073495065,0.0037818826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02283181,0.0004948725,0.000325135,0.00027290135,0.001205658,0.0011056883,0.0025999302,0.0014412394,0.00039668105],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036647584,0.021437664,0.053100772,0.0019225259,0.00064773473,0.0011969839,0.004039345,0.0041457573,0.5835749,0.005058558,0.0014832976,0.28674486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025143714,0.06477437,0.49406093,0.0006986138,0.0010831172,0.0030760048,0.0020887768,0.01836634,0.37405244,0.02472221,0.014165783,0.00039713865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022992373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002466502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037818826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006163483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009836119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012651682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990354644","doi":"10.1037/a0015122","title":"Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: Improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metamemory; Recall; Psychology; Free recall; Cued recall; Recall test; Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Serial position effect; Metacognition; Cognition; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.054623324375215214,"score_gpt":0.3455579847502148,"score_spread":0.2909346603749996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990354644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940726,0.0001982897,0.0045185,0.00012151645,0.000016178092,0.000026527754,0.000026334621,0.000056448458,0.00096356345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502134,0.00011002899,0.004374773,0.000044218606,0.000010155052,0.000020058606,0.000031494204,0.000011169078,0.0003767377],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898237,0.0003002309,0.00006453882,0.00030634954,0.0002877539,0.000058743375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98798966,0.0070579676,0.0023763566,0.0016935343,0.00042583363,0.0004565954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023251483,0.00033179572,0.00028380463,0.0002954029,0.0001577914,0.00094931247,0.0005079696,0.0006919209,0.0010523475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024579361,0.00043434868,0.00025201775,0.00013880293,0.00048566386,0.0012434976,0.0007844764,0.0010054369,0.00015006402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077973367,0.0034753953,0.10215195,0.00049971265,0.00048789504,0.0003290565,0.0034872494,0.002564796,0.6067218,0.002340879,0.0009140389,0.26922986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005418099,0.011842676,0.59398603,0.0001118904,0.000558268,0.0010464006,0.00074755365,0.018757213,0.3561726,0.01256433,0.0034669286,0.00020439201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048134653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076550414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023251483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002769389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028372018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012296677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990476368","doi":"10.1037/a0025481","title":"Assessing the effect of lexical variables in backward recall.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recall; Free recall; Recall test; Psychology; Similarity (geometry); Order (exchange); Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08120271322475191,"score_gpt":0.38441630008151717,"score_spread":0.30321358685676525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990476368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9770084,0.0020534473,0.017223066,0.00005347751,0.00010377807,0.00027531313,0.00055357564,0.000098739896,0.002630141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97720134,0.00078404375,0.01839178,0.00015077302,0.000050221377,0.00040185588,0.0009068209,0.000105399566,0.0020078986],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758065,0.00056162063,0.0004367932,0.00056445925,0.0007443798,0.00011210688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760357,0.015563579,0.0035308425,0.002974866,0.00141525,0.0004798237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042633247,0.0009797441,0.00086799054,0.00095902936,0.00023662308,0.0009507816,0.00060645735,0.0010135198,0.0026907825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024918567,0.00039851211,0.0005030456,0.00060712127,0.0007403345,0.0013690124,0.00085715303,0.00094953366,0.0006553605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0125459535,0.0024884643,0.081189536,0.0010422479,0.0005894016,0.000382406,0.001076148,0.0006367167,0.8003262,0.0010592557,0.0003014296,0.09836219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051313895,0.017132007,0.47042698,0.00015315594,0.0013540128,0.0018439624,0.0003906877,0.00415825,0.49332836,0.0071101626,0.003387661,0.0002015479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062254665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008351715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042633247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022703514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032239442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022546887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991874795","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.54","title":"Repetition Blindness in Rapid Lists: Activation and Inhibition Versus Construction and Attribution.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Blindness; Attribution; Word (group theory); Computer science; Psychology; Lexical analysis; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Social psychology; Optometry; Medicine","score_opus":0.036560471076416745,"score_gpt":0.35340260274160096,"score_spread":0.3168421316651842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991874795","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97452366,0.00043581202,0.015215115,0.00026751455,0.00003383522,0.00010044078,0.000089615634,0.00015717927,0.009176829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937436,0.00012594914,0.004143843,0.00010083467,0.000019861754,0.000053189324,0.00007116825,0.000035279594,0.0017062083],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919516,0.00024526584,0.000053944797,0.000109727756,0.00029161334,0.00010427337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984683,0.008528919,0.0044394606,0.0011989407,0.00068066205,0.00046898407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016325326,0.00026142577,0.00024025566,0.00071162765,0.0002734676,0.00072848593,0.00059706415,0.00064557325,0.0032808867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020936782,0.00024803207,0.0001859761,0.0003918077,0.0011012711,0.0014110369,0.0011818019,0.0005916376,0.00034314735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008462492,0.001964861,0.11534162,0.0009241442,0.0001621796,0.0013796365,0.012009558,0.0023637793,0.5297032,0.028611494,0.0017017961,0.29737526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003642522,0.004743847,0.680166,0.00015161428,0.00034668896,0.0055632954,0.0028422733,0.021242145,0.2110358,0.06406283,0.009262738,0.00021848848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008258932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069893774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032808867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034540283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040219835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010975659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992157668","doi":"10.1037/a0015278","title":"Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; British Academy","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Response priming; Psychology; Prime (order theory); Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Repetition priming; Natural language processing; Computer science; Linguistics; Cognition; Neuroscience; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.050309578468858134,"score_gpt":0.38790377689895367,"score_spread":0.3375941984300955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992157668","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03678095,0.0015659984,0.9525408,0.00019399868,0.0008557366,0.0016274841,0.00021026931,0.0024547821,0.0037699537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15559962,0.0011271355,0.83363193,0.00040353282,0.00023574028,0.0046230867,0.00022686279,0.00079475675,0.0033572828],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976241,0.0009885298,0.00018348182,0.00051077903,0.00058515184,0.00010801359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99512094,0.0022702496,0.0006636109,0.0012960843,0.00046509693,0.00018395396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004857199,0.0012205179,0.0013621821,0.0009853649,0.00063394994,0.00073810597,0.0020687731,0.0015611367,0.006937692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009068555,0.0010926245,0.000876785,0.0008215882,0.0012990235,0.0018226425,0.0020982157,0.003443817,0.0019113444],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021130268,0.00057664176,0.0006622513,0.0014660894,0.00018080528,0.00042197082,0.00054233026,0.00050426845,0.8605621,0.010851856,0.003267085,0.11885161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085346424,0.0049403394,0.006472116,0.00022907105,0.0005857227,0.005606673,0.00016112736,0.018432178,0.8894838,0.027545795,0.045376733,0.00031298597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021907328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004503214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006937692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033816168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008202849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025687635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992864919","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.27.2.483","title":"Implicit learning of first-, second-, and third-order transition probabilities.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Transition (genetics); Sequence (biology); Implicit learning; Sequence learning; Order (exchange); Cognitive psychology; Implicit knowledge; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Cognitive science; Cognition","score_opus":0.01897396276769248,"score_gpt":0.3049733519698632,"score_spread":0.2859993892021707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992864919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89779204,0.0010083542,0.08005623,0.00046490738,0.00010175002,0.00006699737,0.00030073195,0.0002474473,0.019961478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98930347,0.0003807241,0.007812089,0.00007808782,0.000018744293,0.000022041291,0.00021604433,0.000021567801,0.0021471735],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992613,0.00018080758,0.00004308085,0.00020374663,0.00026471433,0.000046355628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850796,0.007728147,0.0033566435,0.0025344272,0.000859797,0.0004412999],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019997898,0.00031370585,0.00025765784,0.0003214914,0.00018580932,0.0012337134,0.0004803524,0.00055477145,0.0026404671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028336557,0.00027497037,0.0002743304,0.00024436557,0.0008179324,0.0026197298,0.0009792182,0.001748033,0.00037792278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015052315,0.0012882401,0.20491524,0.0009111937,0.00039207356,0.00023867277,0.0032145295,0.009599237,0.10280896,0.04674254,0.0019737987,0.6264103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017178412,0.002433106,0.5792965,0.00040132832,0.00040807424,0.0020874122,0.0008200101,0.07100254,0.17050137,0.1588849,0.013754074,0.00023896537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014413368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025229107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026404671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039499544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008271351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010576069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1993048521","doi":"10.1037/a0033090","title":"Revisiting age-of-acquisition effects in Spanish visual word recognition: The role of item imageability.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Age of Acquisition; Orthography; Psychology; Phonology; Reading (process); Semantics (computer science); Word recognition; Word lists by frequency; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Lexical decision task; Word (group theory); Affect (linguistics); Linguistics; Communication; Computer science; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.014816217443093853,"score_gpt":0.32359494089688967,"score_spread":0.3087787234537958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993048521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982052,0.00043405103,0.0004218851,0.000050563507,0.000011792149,0.00001303886,0.00008918519,0.000012177278,0.0007621564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998789,0.0001037313,0.00041299846,0.000047516973,0.000010010369,0.000015670255,0.000078879246,0.000020947793,0.00052121055],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864775,0.00035747496,0.00012631458,0.0004506895,0.000320997,0.00009679206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97678113,0.014974423,0.0045768362,0.0020458475,0.0009334814,0.000688257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025047364,0.00038345513,0.0004221357,0.00077437493,0.00014918488,0.0006897334,0.000434294,0.00061074307,0.0019469489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010268423,0.0002108742,0.00053424126,0.0003392457,0.00087153877,0.0009592743,0.0007796324,0.0006514749,0.0002688035],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009268652,0.0021951203,0.4369484,0.00042056252,0.0004224228,0.0012143746,0.0040038284,0.00041179042,0.4822811,0.0006836606,0.00034721184,0.061802886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004747211,0.0021177493,0.9784908,0.0000129496175,0.00010494449,0.00028953285,0.0003489242,0.00042277004,0.016988747,0.00059151166,0.0005647836,0.000019770267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020463297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019004324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025047364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003192547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029273637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013246477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994274153","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000003","title":"No generalization of practice for nonzero simple addition.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generalization; Simple (philosophy); Arithmetic; Cognition; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Algorithm; Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03343673985670861,"score_gpt":0.3730890820556265,"score_spread":0.33965234219891793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994274153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9675829,0.0005356165,0.00983898,0.00041240064,0.00010696608,0.0003365505,0.0005288269,0.00027081615,0.020386994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211055,0.00011154767,0.0038397447,0.00023987134,0.000020716583,0.0001695328,0.00031141497,0.000042263964,0.0031544557],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478996,0.0010490709,0.00044872376,0.001584754,0.001879041,0.0002484747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9222473,0.040919535,0.008163456,0.022799332,0.003934906,0.001935608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004920096,0.00038115834,0.00059094693,0.0007068975,0.00039450396,0.0008856564,0.0011558963,0.000987685,0.008163284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060726386,0.00046048276,0.00065852416,0.00046337594,0.00178916,0.0017602276,0.0018994233,0.0017746752,0.00079556543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008176584,0.0037842246,0.2405483,0.0029645609,0.0010789442,0.0008684638,0.012581062,0.0042392183,0.24445185,0.0155310035,0.0033940163,0.4623817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029413326,0.010026119,0.90660506,0.00031560843,0.00032292271,0.0016661751,0.0013188318,0.0068052686,0.037853733,0.017196817,0.017468985,0.0001264452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026465042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025791212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008163284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008483083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011678131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027308881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995437523","doi":"10.1037/a0015638","title":"“Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals”: Correction.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Lexical access; Cognition; Psychology; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Developmental psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03331120518894033,"score_gpt":0.38027679124136404,"score_spread":0.3469655860524237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995437523","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005551819,0.005589123,0.001582678,0.19064651,0.7992772,0.000050997656,0.0009141197,0.00041613693,0.0009682193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026833326,0.010426542,0.006946307,0.45673496,0.44201562,0.00070076436,0.0010547979,0.00045511173,0.054832473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581075,0.00079113554,0.0009379506,0.0009003484,0.0011239747,0.000435879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97309893,0.010321998,0.0012799237,0.0017101355,0.012622465,0.0009664864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004504733,0.0027355223,0.0031424954,0.003286552,0.0026669519,0.0019261066,0.0072915624,0.015246616,0.013991985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059819322,0.0011749141,0.0025582828,0.0031649303,0.004652881,0.0027116488,0.0029132015,0.013445398,0.009434832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001191814,0.000012960117,0.00028037414,0.00039141,0.000056450688,0.00091416336,0.00007606899,0.000062814666,0.00013732289,0.0009844283,0.98945844,0.007506429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005172824,0.00009138152,0.0078089186,0.0014679192,0.00044878505,0.0050936206,0.00042279923,0.0016578117,0.0018822904,0.011071368,0.9693084,0.00022945722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024178179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031798676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024178179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032358433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006019554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0480749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995467224","doi":"10.1037/a0014734","title":"Long-term repetition priming of briefly identified objects.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Repetition priming; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Visual short-term memory; Psychology; Perception; Rapid serial visual presentation; Long-term memory; Iconic memory; Implicit memory; Visual search; Priming (agriculture); Cognition; Working memory; Computer science; Neuroscience; Lexical decision task","score_opus":0.047254932054288996,"score_gpt":0.3602542400818144,"score_spread":0.3129993080275254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995467224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730809,0.0013317348,0.01404034,0.00018528555,0.0002630695,0.00015272952,0.000111187604,0.00040894723,0.010425773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841345,0.00046923448,0.008960564,0.00018415196,0.00008002863,0.00011553955,0.00018339642,0.000070321235,0.005802236],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998567,0.000024001636,0.000012032557,0.000052282794,0.000034594374,0.000020324615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884784,0.000600846,0.0001712113,0.00016755586,0.00009817689,0.000114284965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033409285,0.0003670506,0.000279562,0.00016998258,0.00012941568,0.00025532173,0.00041914373,0.0005442903,0.0054436596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016195169,0.00020404393,0.0002074645,0.000104960716,0.0002730825,0.00034096936,0.00034722663,0.00060438615,0.001255665],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011437178,0.0001960727,0.0006581385,0.00012370749,0.00001751025,0.00020534293,0.000077330646,0.00002662341,0.9861902,0.00038513463,0.00013490628,0.010841332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034983255,0.008717469,0.059566163,0.00004345832,0.00022421099,0.0028390824,0.000056768673,0.0016234637,0.921322,0.0016735514,0.0035506878,0.00003339025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016908589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031560595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054436596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014958972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016519078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018210888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996098384","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.365","title":"An Alternative Perspective on von Winterfeldt et al.'s (1997) Test of Consequence Monotonicity.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Advanced Statistical Methods and Models","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Monotonic function; Certainty; Mathematical economics; Axiom; Mathematics; Probabilistic logic; Econometrics; Statistics","score_opus":0.10083541387017166,"score_gpt":0.47949419166953566,"score_spread":0.378658777799364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996098384","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033131126,0.005194521,0.53008914,0.17965001,0.008877969,0.0006180108,0.0013485068,0.0005627217,0.24052803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65618604,0.0018694683,0.2019719,0.099713184,0.0034069906,0.0021474592,0.00048525125,0.00019755057,0.03402218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986766,0.006544517,0.00069078134,0.0018757555,0.0035811472,0.0005418498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97401977,0.014036795,0.0015395201,0.0050799637,0.004814234,0.0005096892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019249909,0.0009569615,0.0009754694,0.0025759584,0.002069422,0.0035935156,0.0028410868,0.0054678223,0.009829243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.067809775,0.00045178348,0.0017485365,0.0017012618,0.0085504,0.008236004,0.0041548386,0.007040719,0.001969385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015340511,0.00014310141,0.0010615564,0.00008229497,0.000054597796,0.00011117871,0.00066538126,0.0003393517,0.00078457285,0.954848,0.011155912,0.030600587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014285368,0.0002260833,0.0015316276,0.000076583754,0.000037143982,0.00034604452,0.00021919119,0.0029327837,0.0008506295,0.95259696,0.040999826,0.000040251176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018565111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001755902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019249909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026396988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017594184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101804435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996396865","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.757","title":"Choice strategies in multiple-cue probability learning.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Outcome (game theory); Task (project management); Probabilistic logic; Selection (genetic algorithm); Affect (linguistics); Psychology; Statistics; Probability distribution; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Econometrics; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Mathematical economics; Communication; Economics","score_opus":0.04107959231776058,"score_gpt":0.3552992914152958,"score_spread":0.3142196990975352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996396865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9704891,0.00010134154,0.027420714,0.00008921611,0.0000096756075,0.00006977042,0.000040231764,0.00005064809,0.0017291829],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812368,0.00007901582,0.017964464,0.000043780532,0.0000049200567,0.000075409574,0.000059918384,0.000015019763,0.00052070036],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967564,0.0014228306,0.00019456146,0.0005917886,0.00085105933,0.00018343348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721992,0.020243488,0.0037106818,0.0018190736,0.0010724666,0.0009550489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005999036,0.00046544682,0.00053121493,0.00047084282,0.00025073384,0.0013816922,0.00080620573,0.00095015723,0.0019177637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04330189,0.0003786256,0.00041410865,0.00031923826,0.0009967164,0.0017619897,0.0010451518,0.0011530437,0.00027155847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004341887,0.0025604311,0.35596007,0.00086399686,0.00060725625,0.0010595606,0.0047911666,0.06009871,0.14280242,0.033064265,0.0011194979,0.39273074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063261384,0.00462805,0.21616077,0.00019934935,0.0003466177,0.0023648601,0.0016147213,0.5626888,0.067855,0.13846157,0.004739722,0.00030791247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000931518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010696974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005999036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000540633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068363367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03172636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996606535","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1244","title":"Linking associative and serial list memory: Pairs versus triples.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Dissociation (chemistry); Computer science; Associative property; Content-addressable memory; Isolation (microbiology); Arithmetic; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Biology; Pure mathematics; Chemistry; Artificial neural network","score_opus":0.022152592808653507,"score_gpt":0.3259258794838167,"score_spread":0.3037732866751632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996606535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90310335,0.0014575076,0.07530591,0.0006488096,0.00025119164,0.00023055282,0.000290512,0.00021702926,0.018495256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863369,0.00037391752,0.011365286,0.00026631015,0.00006320277,0.00014427824,0.000203689,0.000029799718,0.0012165152],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848026,0.00046013732,0.00008594869,0.0004003803,0.0005030045,0.00007030151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98534346,0.0077379732,0.0025738163,0.002894924,0.0008859996,0.0005638468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024767607,0.000517802,0.000751374,0.0010946023,0.00047618555,0.001870782,0.0010317354,0.00094253605,0.004440105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023863507,0.0004890593,0.00052127993,0.00094673014,0.0018842474,0.007296265,0.0023219527,0.0017668658,0.00061585684],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010152521,0.0016089899,0.104757756,0.0020199392,0.0010392736,0.001020527,0.0069903163,0.0062311413,0.17856444,0.15880977,0.0033199205,0.52548546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005423844,0.0052321153,0.17852412,0.00030680277,0.0011371159,0.0039024556,0.0029594281,0.07373127,0.1572044,0.56637275,0.009672446,0.00041467347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055085594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005572854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004440105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005702369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005282832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014853597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999203786","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1744","title":"Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: Differential control effects?","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Encoding specificity principle; Encoding (memory); Recall test; Cognitive psychology; Episodic memory; Free recall; Memoria; Stimulus (psychology); Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.020426380948935036,"score_gpt":0.308329375127738,"score_spread":0.28790299417880294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999203786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9674224,0.0018401638,0.018900834,0.000517711,0.00017177127,0.00023738548,0.000071870774,0.00020075815,0.010637034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965629,0.00022616138,0.0018640487,0.00018216652,0.00007266193,0.000093843206,0.000059135,0.00006289254,0.0008762922],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975126,0.00044172097,0.00020329446,0.000763419,0.0007040717,0.00037489017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870629,0.008054028,0.0013456705,0.0019467563,0.00058862014,0.0010021818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035212596,0.0005621754,0.0009254286,0.0006444683,0.00036954117,0.0015758293,0.0010364816,0.00069182954,0.0026241378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018597433,0.00049503247,0.0003861639,0.0004186811,0.0014131153,0.0019365693,0.0013320398,0.0010424505,0.0002946297],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011099257,0.0017762063,0.042194813,0.0007860316,0.00044381278,0.0005051635,0.003762031,0.00092961395,0.6384731,0.011815779,0.0007899709,0.28742427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021655124,0.0046968195,0.78432447,0.00018603903,0.0007017184,0.0013466884,0.0008871034,0.010360124,0.16116603,0.028816646,0.005136186,0.00021270306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022527848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014695766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035212596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088421913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00053027645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018622458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000428062","doi":"10.1037/a0016372","title":"Test sequence priming in recognition memory.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Recall; Facilitation; Cognitive psychology; Recognition memory; Social psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience; Biology","score_opus":0.09025682315588515,"score_gpt":0.3715581130772051,"score_spread":0.28130128992132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000428062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8741524,0.0049354336,0.061490312,0.000988105,0.0010860988,0.0008487284,0.00019745104,0.00033623562,0.05596514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97365475,0.0010964661,0.018806895,0.0006858886,0.00019490844,0.00039562702,0.000114253075,0.000054950084,0.004996241],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989311,0.00048684818,0.00006416612,0.000250052,0.00021063797,0.000057086647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99223495,0.0058092317,0.0005722447,0.00079619954,0.0003170706,0.00027023852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025954875,0.00047078804,0.0005438044,0.0003597351,0.00023631238,0.00055201096,0.0005330629,0.0009712998,0.006882646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007479211,0.00038691045,0.0003702475,0.0002252144,0.0008828393,0.0013123613,0.00074712,0.0010173367,0.0008361138],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014995742,0.0021859496,0.010196535,0.0020093655,0.00020979201,0.0010000193,0.001991154,0.0008673788,0.64468986,0.06891402,0.0023067233,0.2506335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018035512,0.016302222,0.08474048,0.00027605347,0.0007383369,0.0056857355,0.00038837333,0.0091677485,0.7576609,0.09978568,0.023260748,0.00019014394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013874391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019903028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006882646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036127615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023845052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023024738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002688572","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.211","title":"Item and associative recognition with precuing and postcuing.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Associative property; Psychology; Task (project management); Serial position effect; Cognitive psychology; Presentation (obstetrics); Test (biology); Free recall; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04272554025492149,"score_gpt":0.32119278402668455,"score_spread":0.2784672437717631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002688572","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989316,0.002482624,0.0041918065,0.00007156434,0.00014758753,0.00007208135,0.00020850488,0.00006104829,0.003448895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946313,0.00050817867,0.0021747574,0.00007789874,0.000032857122,0.000044460005,0.00022778625,0.000018426992,0.0022843943],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890625,0.0002742109,0.00010178309,0.0002607571,0.00032508027,0.00013189774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99580526,0.0017948285,0.00062621536,0.0009406166,0.00035228598,0.0004807513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001755251,0.0003618152,0.00044451974,0.00048151243,0.00014165955,0.0007056594,0.0005769971,0.00069696223,0.0030065933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060886736,0.00023919762,0.00019320045,0.00036820682,0.00073008094,0.0009999684,0.00052310136,0.0008700001,0.0005018866],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014524932,0.002355139,0.039974935,0.00060379016,0.00023104985,0.00034361676,0.00048380365,0.0004740105,0.73096573,0.0016134334,0.00076915615,0.20766035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025817662,0.012638138,0.4852358,0.000031300326,0.00024976258,0.0012183444,0.00016607813,0.0020360725,0.49303797,0.0018151166,0.0032551722,0.000058183825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091829733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013112376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030065933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040355828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023883733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010058105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006486802","doi":"10.1037/a0013508","title":"Eye movements when looking at unusual/weird scenes: Are there cultural differences?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health; Microsoft","keywords":"Psychology; Eye movement; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Preference; Visual perception; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.12304670139905927,"score_gpt":0.3478211327153021,"score_spread":0.2247744313162428,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006486802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99827707,0.0002183446,0.00040495893,0.000066888955,0.000010157148,0.000010457058,0.000029291377,0.000006198049,0.0009766535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993279,0.00015575648,0.0002290907,0.0000731543,0.0000059316403,0.0000050693984,0.000029132505,0.0000043293508,0.00016958105],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998135,0.00004111867,0.000022807722,0.000050940896,0.00004667503,0.000025023786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984737,0.00047111235,0.0006087368,0.00018779746,0.00017657963,0.000082059065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00068553805,0.000216818,0.00020933869,0.00044903994,0.00013520248,0.00038177677,0.0001867035,0.00026434773,0.0010037716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004319724,0.00017202874,0.00018812342,0.00021932847,0.0005805588,0.00045500137,0.00023054672,0.000317841,0.00010220371],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001181017,0.0001472189,0.6365926,0.0003115287,0.00030748776,0.0012419577,0.01088404,0.00026113784,0.28393367,0.00055035955,0.0004885807,0.06410038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065704676,0.00007792804,0.9955161,0.000010210593,0.00001769287,0.000337935,0.0009842454,0.00010667908,0.002647707,0.000118287426,0.00016876338,0.000007875205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027720225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031975217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027720225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016264225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009750141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0055118203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007994902","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1341","title":"Executive control in a modified antisaccade task: Effects of aging and bilingualism.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":430,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Neuroscience of multilingualism; Psychology; Task (project management); Antisaccade task; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Executive functions; Cognition; Task analysis; Attentional control; Developmental psychology; Eye movement; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04244540111321616,"score_gpt":0.3661258198808997,"score_spread":0.32368041876768355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007994902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973744,0.00025886478,0.00051699363,0.000046819914,0.000043561915,0.000059755967,0.00016490625,0.000030389489,0.0015043652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947634,0.00023265167,0.0016723514,0.00017428727,0.00005561998,0.00019690169,0.00050787936,0.000056842506,0.002340164],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995196,0.000121108176,0.0000537588,0.00012549259,0.00014362008,0.000036563182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532986,0.0019371883,0.0015123845,0.00042948304,0.0002468149,0.0005443572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001284614,0.0009060097,0.00044075376,0.0003798172,0.00020659261,0.00051752944,0.00038260128,0.0003935643,0.0024968085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065946807,0.00026164792,0.00018033122,0.00021489736,0.00039325887,0.0005008285,0.0003658231,0.00069587183,0.00035758066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048712876,0.00785574,0.09003676,0.0006226928,0.0005973639,0.0006977311,0.0013176154,0.00045396297,0.77835804,0.00042715884,0.0010447658,0.06987538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000621141,0.010367008,0.93815815,0.00002745488,0.0002556499,0.0008363521,0.00012547478,0.0016281168,0.045988522,0.00058107986,0.0013628278,0.000048107537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001200093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002884981,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024968085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026407893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000468337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008352637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008182492","doi":"10.1037/a0014876","title":"Sources of bias in the Goodman–Kruskal gamma coefficient measure of association: Implications for studies of metacognitive processes.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":176,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Metacognition; Metamemory; Psychology; Measure (data warehouse); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Response bias; Value (mathematics); Perception; Statistics; Social psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.15839592694552024,"score_gpt":0.4132077058072505,"score_spread":0.2548117788617303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008182492","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38682553,0.009050332,0.57659763,0.0044449433,0.0012501976,0.0003566379,0.0007657395,0.00052710134,0.020181863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92878705,0.0009024697,0.067376494,0.0008032375,0.00034452192,0.00029062605,0.00030112502,0.00012741199,0.0010670302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.98460716,0.007956204,0.0014536193,0.001891623,0.00375279,0.00033861992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6593673,0.27473566,0.028923245,0.025447488,0.00982044,0.0017058434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03888746,0.00062038034,0.00090206583,0.0038997834,0.0009566793,0.0028841991,0.0019090654,0.0015744464,0.0013096293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2768963,0.0003325469,0.000863141,0.0052365237,0.0046847076,0.0043678842,0.0028594788,0.0022937711,0.00039288113],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010733082,0.00024578604,0.36123285,0.0005318594,0.0011041238,0.00089247816,0.0056680753,0.013363461,0.0059102476,0.3216814,0.010291334,0.27800515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008318532,0.00042192527,0.23897119,0.0003049942,0.00029484922,0.0022576,0.0016031845,0.038625076,0.006045671,0.6972875,0.013759303,0.0003454686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020769946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013820567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03888746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013442566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013878887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20565897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010159731","doi":"10.1037/a0018469","title":"The ubiquitous nature of the Hebb repetition effect: Error learning mistaken for the absence of sequence learning.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sequence learning; Repetition (rhetorical device); Sequence (biology); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Cognition; Recall; Stimulus (psychology); Implicit learning; Computer science; Serial learning; Speech recognition; Communication; Natural language processing; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.018239403414624475,"score_gpt":0.34566428916199526,"score_spread":0.3274248857473708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010159731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82249504,0.0054876623,0.15309067,0.0016650981,0.0007781854,0.00014981795,0.0003942501,0.0016828054,0.014256396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827141,0.0005289832,0.014202856,0.00034811904,0.000087336055,0.000022363116,0.000110527435,0.000104267325,0.0018813978],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778867,0.00029272845,0.00021632065,0.0006085394,0.0009705439,0.0001230708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814185,0.006448525,0.00575811,0.004386914,0.0013771916,0.0006107979],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021313457,0.00043528582,0.00061366224,0.0009181061,0.0003729156,0.0006375885,0.0010701157,0.001116195,0.0019870242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018276453,0.00024583266,0.0002917837,0.00047732345,0.0022830628,0.0019482574,0.0012085364,0.00151486,0.0005460951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037925616,0.00038893704,0.08132671,0.00081469043,0.00034033344,0.006819382,0.0015520602,0.0022918854,0.61632377,0.027910145,0.0040156613,0.2544239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020411347,0.0024292662,0.38354757,0.000268007,0.00045574832,0.09048673,0.0008803708,0.017919142,0.37071672,0.11640489,0.016395826,0.00029154262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009436156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011758152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021313457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034420006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048393023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011271775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012493037","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.26.1.28","title":"Probability judgment in three-category classification learning.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Subadditivity; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Context effect; Set (abstract data type); Cognition; Counterintuitive; Social psychology; Mathematics; Computer science; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.20659909491471232,"score_gpt":0.4234373883273,"score_spread":0.21683829341258767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012493037","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98557615,0.00020318008,0.009759408,0.0002398338,0.000023667993,0.000040026123,0.000040656712,0.00003906795,0.0040780283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621034,0.00005760741,0.0032667525,0.0000622678,0.000009687914,0.000017513896,0.00004183158,0.000005021128,0.00032896057],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690056,0.0013813736,0.00018835755,0.0003978343,0.0009779882,0.0001539561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9577036,0.030273322,0.006226433,0.0031085643,0.0012928504,0.0013952821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006552627,0.00041753083,0.00037114037,0.00038760874,0.0002804221,0.0011680089,0.00040170422,0.0010083521,0.002542511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06124143,0.00032742755,0.00027325857,0.00027321375,0.0013921347,0.0019814596,0.0010126623,0.0012029662,0.00039917638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014907209,0.003304802,0.36213025,0.00070389506,0.0005403213,0.00079641625,0.005693411,0.013091117,0.1438319,0.030586071,0.0026675458,0.42174706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005535359,0.005110371,0.6535526,0.00010837567,0.0003291178,0.001777154,0.0015029012,0.091442995,0.06560895,0.17524596,0.0045322916,0.00023577632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049440196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042515728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006552627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037214955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027091353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03465396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012620291","doi":"10.1037/a0021971","title":"Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.16319331512031035,"score_gpt":0.35874363942046916,"score_spread":0.1955503243001588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012620291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99780816,0.00047780684,0.00016427618,0.000045792458,0.000016537406,0.000014888769,0.00035603243,0.000017560498,0.0010989452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978885,0.00029554838,0.00023912176,0.000064132415,0.000008680861,0.000015857,0.00050073955,0.0000029147457,0.0009844827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996493,0.000027302052,0.00003731876,0.00007996048,0.00010395379,0.00010218679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977196,0.00020224937,0.0012795775,0.00013389876,0.00040205984,0.00026270014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009769412,0.00037949995,0.0004897866,0.0011092732,0.00050442346,0.00073862984,0.0003594903,0.0004762809,0.0016813833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00358527,0.00019116243,0.00048837846,0.0003914338,0.00037152017,0.000554653,0.00078399736,0.0006394162,0.0006179988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040205166,0.0002181429,0.9578698,0.000034321656,0.000040827614,0.0017342331,0.0016476745,0.000056481713,0.0033740704,0.00014144547,0.00083626393,0.033644572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072849216,0.0004129164,0.9941526,0.000016571828,0.000019163106,0.0031481748,0.0003611049,0.000054157987,0.0007102824,0.00016330373,0.0009450123,0.000009454536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004860046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005832452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004860046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031236347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032354196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009663522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012666986","doi":"10.1037/a0017680","title":"Does perceived race affect discrimination and recognition of ambiguous-race faces? A test of the sociocognitive hypothesis.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Psychology; Race (biology); Affect (linguistics); Perception; Face perception; PsycINFO; Population; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.044750384712591115,"score_gpt":0.33041039856668364,"score_spread":0.2856600138540925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012666986","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980521,0.00008998762,0.00013921523,0.00012153445,0.000016795868,0.00001012663,0.000045590637,0.000001992432,0.0015226816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998703,0.000073246374,0.00019462657,0.00013358195,0.000015970332,0.000018799927,0.00005873266,0.0000034584145,0.00079857867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996319,0.00013242652,0.000021758247,0.00008964692,0.00009026545,0.000034052493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961146,0.0018970871,0.0011236959,0.00040195414,0.00015659365,0.00030604165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097023294,0.0002013341,0.00023021262,0.0001866444,0.00016053188,0.00060596655,0.00032354536,0.00057374896,0.004527144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007160246,0.00014808282,0.00017167318,0.0001021548,0.0005715474,0.0009677745,0.00049146486,0.0005054597,0.00043184203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024759673,0.009058222,0.56572795,0.00046129368,0.00044051764,0.0010865798,0.007354835,0.0004993838,0.26277077,0.001694549,0.0025636754,0.12358259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013081927,0.0020815914,0.98864615,0.000018571875,0.000060680275,0.0002063583,0.00063988694,0.00087031175,0.005799694,0.0010342456,0.00049404165,0.000017721863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014201021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013738065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004527144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018315148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001531975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015144825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014785507","doi":"10.1037/a0028150","title":"The role of orthography in the semantic activation of neighbors.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Phonology; Orthography; Computer science; Kanji; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Word (group theory); Artificial intelligence; Reading (process); Chinese characters","score_opus":0.01801850704155146,"score_gpt":0.3313106702072374,"score_spread":0.313292163165686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014785507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96199566,0.0009521331,0.007110147,0.00023377036,0.00005359844,0.000019767225,0.00010850699,0.00005926863,0.029467214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99424464,0.00042662042,0.0031899218,0.000047434714,0.000009722474,0.00001586641,0.00008393227,0.000034617904,0.0019472378],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997831,0.00005090133,0.0000123641985,0.000070790906,0.00006208184,0.000020776932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992093,0.00031775673,0.00016906118,0.00009511978,0.00011837306,0.00009036543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002478621,0.00022770415,0.00015581319,0.000300727,0.00030958373,0.0007084693,0.0002552161,0.00032014868,0.0016831357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014835544,0.00016856095,0.00019115023,0.00020523905,0.0007387175,0.000895419,0.0005738799,0.00036918942,0.00021294298],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044013164,0.00010846046,0.022785537,0.0003845853,0.00005733901,0.00046214034,0.0025542,0.00040108297,0.8694938,0.009853552,0.00045891164,0.09300039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089953166,0.001052124,0.6555358,0.00014886886,0.0003228408,0.0019863306,0.0034488544,0.0051670023,0.28764325,0.034856908,0.00965586,0.00009224279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010349242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023577095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016831357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023969372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032888952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005630672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015174774","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.236","title":"Relation and lexical priming during the interpretation of noun–noun combinations.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Noun; Priming (agriculture); Linguistics; Head (geology); Interpretation (philosophy); Schema (genetic algorithms); Lexical decision task; Natural language processing; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Computer science; Philosophy; Cognition; Biology; Botany; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.025519041879439132,"score_gpt":0.3312779821286372,"score_spread":0.30575894024919803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015174774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9354959,0.0017996735,0.016055008,0.0005721917,0.00046962695,0.0002448631,0.00023221165,0.0002840356,0.044846438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871935,0.00081767444,0.0066530844,0.00032089037,0.00012634731,0.00024874954,0.00019443281,0.0002197926,0.0042254543],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932444,0.000199081,0.000030030033,0.00023617363,0.00015616421,0.000054076845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748564,0.0015476572,0.00044551402,0.00020708864,0.00012965889,0.00018445124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007345585,0.00047310622,0.00040935667,0.0002999087,0.00031328743,0.00056457164,0.00034890784,0.0005228001,0.006886836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043376344,0.00042858333,0.0003218413,0.00023702343,0.0008849828,0.0013699334,0.0009069653,0.0011528976,0.000906232],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015288005,0.0002007063,0.0010999476,0.00046080834,0.000024472354,0.00030660673,0.00096832425,0.000047414756,0.97482884,0.003543525,0.00030098337,0.016689446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012207978,0.008478304,0.25416782,0.00034239277,0.0005453327,0.009910747,0.0014786692,0.0034585905,0.654398,0.05028768,0.015575785,0.00013588293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026952798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004429209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006886836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031327162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003094138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023038745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2015214827","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1534","title":"Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: When old does not mirror new.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Recall; Cognitive psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Recognition memory; False memory; Free recall; Recall test; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.048550424805639036,"score_gpt":0.3379516261040362,"score_spread":0.28940120129839714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2015214827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909764,0.00066026876,0.0031025235,0.0001665617,0.00006574999,0.000020568223,0.00006336166,0.000064604144,0.0048799333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973923,0.00018133424,0.0012488351,0.00009398932,0.000013135746,0.000011542293,0.00004736444,0.000013288633,0.0009982195],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996855,0.00007521808,0.000037616694,0.000081002785,0.000085965985,0.000034699104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967276,0.0016137933,0.00069887575,0.00049331516,0.00022548865,0.00024087667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007424279,0.0001580846,0.00021471918,0.00032764365,0.00012958633,0.0007180449,0.0002669208,0.00066326134,0.0016044833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006224247,0.00022137356,0.00014725376,0.00011977684,0.00066590443,0.001194565,0.00041782987,0.000457797,0.00023611014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008411926,0.00041264342,0.06526854,0.00041444317,0.00018237118,0.0012524282,0.0015228813,0.00022661228,0.8160316,0.0029382345,0.0008084762,0.10252979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120995224,0.0038310091,0.67013353,0.00006924113,0.0003088241,0.003544985,0.0010159154,0.002707962,0.3106031,0.004814933,0.0027680823,0.00008143736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005087257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007919937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016044833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026323332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011424945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005367577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016723033","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.26.3.638","title":"On the relationship between recognition speed and accuracy for words rehearsed via rote versus elaborative rehearsal.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Rote learning; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Word (group theory); Verbal learning; Linguistics; Teaching method; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.14812140767651663,"score_gpt":0.3964147442932424,"score_spread":0.24829333661672578,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016723033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964579,0.00056811195,0.0010961301,0.000049823902,0.000031384192,0.00002368226,0.0002091265,0.00004063035,0.0015233732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978015,0.0002310309,0.00065094663,0.000051996853,0.00003138365,0.000016355061,0.0003598282,0.000026995245,0.00082985725],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863094,0.00038726287,0.00012475018,0.00038195896,0.00035294297,0.00012208031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89860344,0.0795482,0.012635845,0.0045125484,0.0031301389,0.001569776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033854044,0.0003405618,0.0003637688,0.0010574955,0.00011650212,0.00064575044,0.00041652247,0.0009593597,0.0029548837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047117636,0.00035942742,0.00031637534,0.0006316409,0.00063825457,0.0011801893,0.00045170725,0.0010374903,0.0011787916],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02337339,0.0017687144,0.84153235,0.00025849525,0.001207044,0.00047510015,0.0012772352,0.0027611218,0.051901076,0.00067948987,0.00094161567,0.07382444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010949451,0.005541577,0.971753,0.000019883313,0.00019811584,0.0010007946,0.00012281448,0.004835985,0.015325816,0.0006222353,0.00041662267,0.00005372484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009344123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080434536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033854044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019562973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015220071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017903984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019587681","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.50","title":"Contextual effects on reading aloud: Evidence for pathway control.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Reading aloud; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Reading (process); Control (management); Lexical access; Read aloud; Phonology; Cognition; Stimulus (psychology); Linguistics; Communication; Neuroscience; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.0636344774116507,"score_gpt":0.3793450386593678,"score_spread":0.3157105612477171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019587681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98710465,0.0006672917,0.005893379,0.000154316,0.000048805694,0.000049513317,0.00017385511,0.0001568095,0.005751188],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962631,0.0002724105,0.0026962191,0.0000602544,0.0000131849965,0.00003913391,0.00007271569,0.00006686781,0.0005160336],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908745,0.0003175883,0.000059643204,0.00024669326,0.0002257836,0.00006277299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99261624,0.0042045224,0.0014728083,0.0008393041,0.0003749348,0.0004920645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056599785,0.00027761617,0.0002492135,0.000241838,0.00021964846,0.00062774634,0.00028677532,0.00036960497,0.0035179162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009913553,0.0003545523,0.0001752292,0.00012678091,0.00074998045,0.0006062389,0.0009133362,0.00062285824,0.00024255594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0038773145,0.00055677874,0.014788399,0.0005615471,0.00011676138,0.0006327535,0.0010504791,0.00077716936,0.9315976,0.0036026195,0.00024253353,0.042196102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008335509,0.0055461517,0.5508758,0.00016727242,0.0005198811,0.0017726078,0.0007677767,0.0065653455,0.40553504,0.021796897,0.0054650796,0.00015457133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010746855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015803431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035179162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028599444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003140865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011768639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020117243","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.370","title":"Liking and Memory for Musical Stimuli as a Function of Exposure.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":236,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Active listening; Psychology; Function (biology); Association (psychology); Audiology; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.06063654374620692,"score_gpt":0.35839322611829355,"score_spread":0.29775668237208663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020117243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990042,0.00009812711,0.00031586166,0.000015818692,0.000008664895,0.000013907379,0.000054438533,0.00001646915,0.00047249545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99816895,0.00007534415,0.00053278607,0.00003964081,0.000010806048,0.000035609002,0.00015001075,0.000010306759,0.0009765868],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995079,0.000117215684,0.000036570844,0.00014395478,0.00012343038,0.00007093656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950008,0.0023786826,0.0010907582,0.00050171005,0.0003004679,0.0007275703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097361376,0.0003913411,0.00051011593,0.0003141063,0.00014776546,0.0007215212,0.00024068415,0.0005093553,0.002746287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005476261,0.0002776543,0.00029869284,0.00017897163,0.00047560217,0.0005551917,0.0005004272,0.0011954176,0.0002817688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018683137,0.005202705,0.13985455,0.00029026688,0.00048979995,0.0004017267,0.0021473954,0.00039153997,0.78382725,0.00020676239,0.00047060964,0.048034288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000096889795,0.011921302,0.9186273,0.000012002753,0.00018521982,0.00030390173,0.00029721882,0.0010599159,0.06677882,0.00027868344,0.0003924527,0.000046182002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047779645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000701296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002746287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020485996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009637874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0091872215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022276473","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.563","title":"Using Comprehensive Feature Lists to Bias Medical Diagnosis.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Diagnostic accuracy; Medicine; Medical literature; Medical physics; Psychology; Computer science; Radiology; Pathology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.09710683638292317,"score_gpt":0.43082462096433477,"score_spread":0.3337177845814116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022276473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76654613,0.010879283,0.13635464,0.02229161,0.0035299405,0.0036736722,0.0021623133,0.0014780127,0.053084396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9125282,0.0013915593,0.07101179,0.008609868,0.0007977959,0.0015990984,0.0007332477,0.00013134778,0.0031970597],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.91996115,0.053168837,0.009574817,0.00391753,0.01246076,0.0009168529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4074033,0.46099043,0.08265617,0.026075507,0.020269504,0.002605075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.075775854,0.0008043292,0.0007589083,0.003575648,0.0014583999,0.0024324525,0.0011268165,0.0019498188,0.005808703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45337552,0.00067315943,0.00066079653,0.001928049,0.0026215343,0.0065405443,0.0036345115,0.0014626523,0.0011249809],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009130345,0.0010176107,0.2868874,0.0040909434,0.0010198514,0.0006999213,0.01939583,0.0015146348,0.011706071,0.020660453,0.038731784,0.60514516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029012873,0.008513934,0.56638175,0.009865219,0.0028022742,0.009498885,0.016403213,0.019888325,0.053870022,0.13621378,0.17236039,0.001300859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015515418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038067035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075775854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001996743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018122464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4007458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023058073","doi":"10.1037/a0017022","title":"Cultural differences in complex addition: Efficient Chinese versus adaptive Belgians and Canadians.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Flemish; Adaptive strategies; Flexibility (engineering); Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Adaptive memory; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Mathematics; Cognition; Statistics; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Geography","score_opus":0.06386927569247529,"score_gpt":0.3610633894732967,"score_spread":0.2971941137808214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023058073","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99876726,0.00010940715,0.00003689635,0.000042041385,0.0000062702766,0.000005407657,0.000055569242,9.570541e-7,0.00097622117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992151,0.000077751654,0.00007460664,0.000041988093,0.000002401616,0.0000041289513,0.00009541925,0.0000024097608,0.00048625522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937016,0.00006645568,0.000049533865,0.00015809954,0.00018801643,0.00016779047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832946,0.000290548,0.00042761583,0.00010966217,0.00051571266,0.00032703628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080627756,0.00044948896,0.00028032588,0.0011209282,0.0014483016,0.0010378269,0.00036616623,0.00029693046,0.003268541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00343142,0.00018289582,0.0002911024,0.0012939854,0.0011269985,0.00041281426,0.0005434562,0.00036695003,0.00020593299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068381324,0.00014664524,0.9298425,0.00007245231,0.00019697644,0.00056988787,0.03636761,0.0001712177,0.0059931856,0.0011581917,0.00056210574,0.02423545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000191881,0.00007555584,0.98831123,0.000013331108,0.000040022038,0.00033392705,0.009831427,0.00011059864,0.00032065038,0.00011446223,0.0008051968,0.000024552348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5651635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61265606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4348365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015904125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015227695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8747947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024811810","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.219","title":"Modeling distributions of immediate memory effects: No strategies needed?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Similarity (geometry); Confusion; Word (group theory); Feature (linguistics); Cognitive psychology; Encoding (memory); Word length; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04310951212316639,"score_gpt":0.3332865909152133,"score_spread":0.2901770787920469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024811810","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04316374,0.00036346188,0.9524946,0.001107479,0.000052408857,0.000113398375,0.00014116251,0.000643631,0.0019200746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7919266,0.0006833976,0.20230238,0.0007846318,0.0001908156,0.0006658347,0.00020239722,0.00048254227,0.002761393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973442,0.0013755468,0.00013218622,0.0006145932,0.00038217485,0.0001513834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96643615,0.023835301,0.0018316633,0.0063293134,0.0009698554,0.00059764873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011647191,0.0014199453,0.002065818,0.0011720273,0.00045690482,0.0025122054,0.004941053,0.0020496352,0.003001324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054421008,0.00097557117,0.0015891735,0.0006953428,0.0026853406,0.0098531395,0.0023435995,0.0030145638,0.000680603],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078480045,0.00043958245,0.04605253,0.0005875029,0.0007649048,0.0007434059,0.0013656802,0.3064749,0.0064551802,0.4523554,0.0045674876,0.17940855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008657433,0.00019751478,0.0030420723,0.00006776716,0.00011441181,0.00037560402,0.00017406944,0.5325558,0.0018456776,0.45948842,0.0019553553,0.00009670691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00468642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00358189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011647191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011824347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007388921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06159699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2026924069","doi":"10.1037/a0013355","title":"Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: A comparison of children and adults.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Task (project management); Associative property; Concept learning; Perception; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Developmental psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.024143610032702028,"score_gpt":0.3165448100540637,"score_spread":0.29240120002136166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2026924069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983798,0.00022621748,0.00020791711,0.000021350224,0.000008789431,0.000020111498,0.000090148955,0.000009313783,0.0010364066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961868,0.00038799352,0.0013323486,0.00010135625,0.0000052939295,0.000039272338,0.00038667445,0.0000072070184,0.0015530579],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960154,0.000038117098,0.000055104974,0.0001100704,0.000108028784,0.0000871591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964881,0.001381582,0.0007747644,0.00031255255,0.00043672198,0.0006063267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012645862,0.00029795078,0.0004989373,0.0004166263,0.0002470651,0.00078621076,0.00027549468,0.00053485675,0.0023993477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003074322,0.00025705472,0.00030268094,0.00020522457,0.00094492786,0.0011340692,0.00052476715,0.00056724617,0.0006392925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062869894,0.0056371316,0.61345154,0.0007867615,0.00029834502,0.0027146458,0.026119456,0.0004932684,0.19200937,0.0025188075,0.002944251,0.14673942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037614984,0.018511694,0.89014643,0.0001738267,0.00027656127,0.005471119,0.010060683,0.0010206803,0.05776945,0.0021780278,0.0138893835,0.00012607951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017767925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021661124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023993477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002004499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027132555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0080266595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027459979","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.243","title":"When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Serial position effect; Free recall; Similarity (geometry); Distraction; Cognitive psychology; Sequence (biology); Phonology; Intrusion; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.11149617090670692,"score_gpt":0.37460480689281556,"score_spread":0.2631086359861086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027459979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9927496,0.00057648687,0.0044825436,0.00027614346,0.00006055963,0.00004583189,0.00004549192,0.000094993055,0.0016683596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997486,0.00031626446,0.0015577849,0.0001331441,0.000029116436,0.000021806787,0.000058834434,0.000028473654,0.00036856646],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927706,0.00009693899,0.00011473046,0.00017468582,0.00025717195,0.00007948981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99693847,0.0010952791,0.00086168165,0.0006003369,0.00021326124,0.00029102026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008413474,0.00031320352,0.0006003472,0.00059891504,0.00018859954,0.000850892,0.0005094934,0.00076857634,0.0011139134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007097813,0.0003528005,0.0002871578,0.00024292346,0.0013499678,0.0011047275,0.0009155095,0.00066581654,0.0003124877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023439212,0.00096073357,0.051385395,0.00050545164,0.00011684541,0.0024491476,0.0010560625,0.00070481154,0.85868096,0.004029374,0.0004083704,0.077359036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029464482,0.0039332877,0.4334462,0.00017614194,0.0003522501,0.012753469,0.0017774934,0.0055437204,0.5121245,0.024975684,0.0045405966,0.00008214759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054297905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006118833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0011139134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030272367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045606738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0044495463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028100076","doi":"10.1037/a0028905","title":"Intentional forgetting reduces color-naming interference: Evidence from item-method directed forgetting.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Forgetting; Motivated forgetting; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Colored","score_opus":0.08088507860540571,"score_gpt":0.3979156949619773,"score_spread":0.3170306163565716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028100076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99689305,0.00039636664,0.0015426652,0.00005267283,0.000018158575,0.000023438246,0.000086958506,0.00005239587,0.0009342311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974999,0.00021572043,0.0014981164,0.00008270217,0.000014012632,0.000027240854,0.00023967096,0.00003785374,0.00038483564],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994759,0.00012659788,0.00005442986,0.00011243217,0.00016830956,0.00006225441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959526,0.0011309565,0.0015145277,0.0008844054,0.0002804658,0.00023708532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096853275,0.00037685843,0.00040740936,0.00033807836,0.00011708436,0.0003764087,0.00061369524,0.0003894197,0.0017910815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006009722,0.0003144026,0.00023234209,0.00016990092,0.000677817,0.00045614413,0.00047512777,0.0005495279,0.0002908505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046794754,0.0015456288,0.03779437,0.0005063996,0.00034593593,0.00067344226,0.00068438414,0.00013988443,0.91311383,0.00044667322,0.0005410507,0.039528985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043227753,0.0041088695,0.5516814,0.000036339698,0.00039697345,0.0023323707,0.00017849007,0.0010989414,0.43609208,0.0013357756,0.002267224,0.00003929408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009405535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009586333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017910815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016142447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030036768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0059918165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2028567680","doi":"10.1037/a0013120","title":"CARIN theory reanalysis reanalyzed: A comment on Maguire, Devereux, Costello, and Cater (2007).","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Linguistic Variation and Morphology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sample (material); British National Corpus; Computer science; Competition (biology); Linguistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Epistemology; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.0379698155262231,"score_gpt":0.3464185383909788,"score_spread":0.3084487228647557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2028567680","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044043272,0.0024065739,0.0017292433,0.9451873,0.04575789,0.000021048121,0.00024036664,0.00021049536,0.004006701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009329541,0.0021792136,0.0037826733,0.91856456,0.048414294,0.0001826367,0.00017541602,0.0003621373,0.017009543],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865143,0.0027574815,0.0015905246,0.0019441321,0.0062962435,0.0008973182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9655313,0.014443649,0.0017723946,0.0018990816,0.015652394,0.0007011819],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01258611,0.0014553227,0.0016300458,0.0025232935,0.007722369,0.0065033576,0.009851777,0.022972152,0.006211818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.071599476,0.0010610492,0.0016102906,0.003267311,0.009098995,0.0068642166,0.0033628675,0.04266788,0.008462234],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016335722,0.000011732428,0.00016445022,0.000063621796,0.000011975417,0.00020586411,0.00064845296,0.0000442559,0.000132726,0.014295588,0.9780743,0.0063307136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024543366,0.00001719735,0.0013839423,0.00028997654,0.00003435132,0.00043355548,0.00094331725,0.0009319196,0.0007296363,0.027868768,0.9672586,0.000084162304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043374266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06536975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043374266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008667234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008658414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08624363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029591787","doi":"10.1037/a0023601","title":"Appearances aren't everything: Shape classifiers and referential processing in Cantonese.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tobacco Research Unit; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Noun; Referent; Classifier (UML); Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Natural language processing; Comprehension; Pattern recognition (psychology); Linguistics","score_opus":0.059518033808106184,"score_gpt":0.34198302756053267,"score_spread":0.2824649937524265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029591787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99576366,0.00020287419,0.00049119676,0.0001341382,0.000006390557,0.0000050074404,0.000050902974,0.000009319609,0.0033363902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868375,0.00006500863,0.00043415185,0.000039813785,0.000002487185,0.000005337903,0.00005580942,0.000006845864,0.0007067114],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981374,0.000039941027,0.000010214674,0.000065764136,0.00003688506,0.000033488024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989343,0.000409874,0.00028525345,0.00011337751,0.00016825285,0.00008893283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006369308,0.00039964507,0.0002173404,0.00052685157,0.0006865073,0.0016159381,0.0002960573,0.0005391329,0.0025317085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027923232,0.0002790736,0.00015136373,0.00027990178,0.0015214448,0.0011610675,0.0007956947,0.0005290398,0.00022502337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010665503,0.00015915418,0.11363142,0.00041090933,0.00006257569,0.0028227037,0.09493546,0.00060565624,0.6782082,0.0058124284,0.0013992285,0.100885704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055797358,0.00031991515,0.95219517,0.00005423167,0.00005333364,0.0011054786,0.021115288,0.0020294236,0.011879045,0.0072284425,0.0038574215,0.00010635082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037138615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049637936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037138615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007962165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042986794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07384491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032027670","doi":"10.1037/a0018991","title":"A vowel is a vowel: Generalizing newly learned phonotactic constraints to new contexts.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; National Institute of Mental Health; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Phonotactics; Vowel; Consonant; Context (archaeology); Mid vowel; Generalization; Speech recognition; Constraint (computer-aided design); Coda; Linguistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Phonology; Acoustics; Formant; Geography","score_opus":0.05282746777591654,"score_gpt":0.4096943494214778,"score_spread":0.35686688164556124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032027670","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978382,0.000111031666,0.0013906364,0.000043250107,0.0000067429037,0.000008897917,0.00002880817,0.000024531155,0.0005478869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701774,0.000157436,0.0022062843,0.00006790114,0.000005303234,0.000009121473,0.00009234298,0.000009629767,0.00043416195],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987614,0.000019746038,0.0000082574925,0.000049601073,0.000032615506,0.000013623473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893445,0.00043327714,0.0002602576,0.00019772504,0.00006406062,0.00011019865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004202442,0.00020809252,0.00016638286,0.000097562806,0.00008816914,0.00033650352,0.00021377194,0.0003098935,0.00085406844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022937285,0.00023523899,0.00014202323,0.000055895478,0.00041483543,0.0006433489,0.00036040516,0.0006479896,0.00018647061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005071918,0.0002742835,0.059037417,0.00020744799,0.000052259435,0.0004270034,0.0020229847,0.00062296656,0.8313307,0.0006692324,0.0004473848,0.104401164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000090952075,0.005239259,0.8002029,0.0000708672,0.00014936716,0.002942948,0.0015599679,0.0087235095,0.17226052,0.004387665,0.004297714,0.000074380885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007199922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015740598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00085406844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009906861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012457518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0028571486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033175346","doi":"10.1037/a0025198","title":"Discriminating famous from fictional names based on lifetime experience: Evidence in support of a signal-detection model based on finite mixture distributions.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Variance (accounting); Detection theory; SIGNAL (programming language); Process (computing); Psychology; Computer science; Receiver operating characteristic; Statistics; Two-alternative forced choice; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0831071054899024,"score_gpt":0.3414036694645664,"score_spread":0.258296563974664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033175346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81965,0.00032288744,0.17788997,0.0002036018,0.000022606826,0.000111764675,0.0000993053,0.00024514232,0.0014547511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97421503,0.000088698864,0.024985572,0.00006706538,0.00001438766,0.000050234154,0.0001224655,0.000034761288,0.00042174716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966577,0.0014116858,0.00023896649,0.00095819286,0.00056736654,0.00016609445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8741939,0.107064806,0.008444662,0.007124762,0.002291446,0.0008805305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0154538285,0.00063486234,0.0007701196,0.0014192687,0.00031034384,0.0022355267,0.001631037,0.0017598792,0.0015526725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103683665,0.00068008166,0.0016304804,0.00077744824,0.0018737307,0.0043266844,0.0015309856,0.0014675886,0.0004332582],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008436147,0.001685225,0.49351877,0.0009547654,0.0022345658,0.0010595184,0.010111017,0.07071765,0.08595098,0.059676014,0.0011942687,0.26446107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021347,0.0017541228,0.24336267,0.000079358026,0.0006090446,0.0020188608,0.0006676523,0.65805817,0.035510898,0.055846535,0.001484131,0.00039512862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014255301,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001073987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0154538285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008438267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034876863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08172864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2034301887","doi":"10.1037/a0031790","title":"Working memory inefficiency: Minimal information is utilized in visual recognition tasks.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Task (project management); Benchmark (surveying); Computer science; Working memory; Change detection; Identity (music); Feature (linguistics); Inefficiency; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.10824144828040101,"score_gpt":0.3853482243461421,"score_spread":0.2771067760657411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2034301887","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9550818,0.00027056967,0.039569974,0.00047119387,0.00002346925,0.0000909639,0.0001259696,0.00018519931,0.0041807736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953762,0.000044833207,0.0040474623,0.00014345201,0.000009941536,0.000045855228,0.00010086105,0.000026564314,0.00020481857],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965396,0.0014142712,0.00039000172,0.0008473223,0.0006130108,0.00019585567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641737,0.020396959,0.004893102,0.008847345,0.0009338569,0.0007551537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008910697,0.0007343849,0.00081738154,0.000668236,0.0003254259,0.0015764154,0.0012721925,0.0011309594,0.001606905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047895506,0.0005670451,0.00058860285,0.0003307639,0.0021806497,0.0036078498,0.0015540741,0.0010428658,0.0002908774],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012554071,0.0016046752,0.28352788,0.002555351,0.0016882888,0.0019691458,0.012152186,0.026998468,0.37644714,0.050910812,0.0035726198,0.22601941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075109716,0.005207992,0.42932993,0.0004317802,0.0009644563,0.004341836,0.0037792022,0.17317563,0.11059615,0.26545075,0.0055649215,0.00040628348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076187565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050600705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008910697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005423087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004460989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047124863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035626975","doi":"10.1037/a0022218","title":"Adults' strategies for simple addition and multiplication: Verbal self-reports and the operand recognition paradigm.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Operand; Multiplication (music); Cognition; Arithmetic; Simple (philosophy); Numerical cognition; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.048400449540334706,"score_gpt":0.33011068315168074,"score_spread":0.28171023361134606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035626975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952637,0.00041459312,0.001366442,0.00006205918,0.000027939901,0.00008206309,0.00047897687,0.00003251289,0.0022718282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941003,0.0003172431,0.0030338068,0.00012006332,0.000016882455,0.00011771874,0.00071714865,0.000008345841,0.0015685672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932647,0.0001865138,0.00011540566,0.00010833152,0.00023002231,0.00003326543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98818296,0.0036919091,0.0052290475,0.0008411657,0.0014594133,0.0005955443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001622617,0.00044333065,0.0002630499,0.00076373975,0.00014295557,0.000892636,0.00025850208,0.00069348514,0.0016204964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013321169,0.00028762198,0.00020524373,0.0003397145,0.0003140934,0.00094570953,0.0004880276,0.00069996994,0.0008474907],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00071710686,0.0013210586,0.8745946,0.00029416877,0.00023875345,0.0004927971,0.012151212,0.0002128846,0.020142121,0.000641819,0.0019290834,0.08726431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011427276,0.0023778281,0.9780386,0.00005781416,0.00012260285,0.0025080442,0.0036625096,0.0011427893,0.0075703696,0.00079433736,0.0035319491,0.000078910525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049557467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009332169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001622617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000909622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011445041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00858134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035642456","doi":"10.1037/a0029523","title":"The longer we have to forget the more we remember: The ironic effect of postcue duration in item-based directed forgetting.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Motivated forgetting; Forgetting; Duration (music); Psychology; Retrieval-induced forgetting; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.028567907949744804,"score_gpt":0.3491186901621888,"score_spread":0.32055078221244404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035642456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982243,0.00034468056,0.00073504687,0.00003669618,0.00000904445,0.0000067185283,0.000021552234,0.000013193427,0.00060879695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981287,0.00019409995,0.0010357097,0.000061001974,0.000012078766,0.00000839373,0.00005157636,0.000019533118,0.0004888326],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997644,0.000059330687,0.000017797815,0.00006117156,0.00006853811,0.000028857423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592066,0.002222748,0.0010455892,0.0003322861,0.00015870991,0.00031992965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006665127,0.00027829935,0.0002881374,0.00016756819,0.00013533702,0.0005080553,0.0002794048,0.00041916475,0.0013742488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048487494,0.00030887884,0.00014294889,0.000102676706,0.00049670495,0.00061903277,0.00038275847,0.0006289884,0.0001272637],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053220205,0.0005930371,0.015867412,0.00017525021,0.000071278024,0.00025867572,0.0005510482,0.00031345076,0.9437548,0.00049497973,0.00016776132,0.03243031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034647243,0.0072792345,0.75027436,0.000055870296,0.00033892464,0.000821702,0.0003199224,0.003239343,0.2330958,0.0028368395,0.0013302823,0.000061218314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067693874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011796852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013742488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002408933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020637542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0045973063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036731207","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.524","title":"Learning correct responses and errors in the Hebb repetition effect: Two faces of the same coin.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Recall; Sequence (biology); Sequence learning; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Psychology; Session (web analytics); Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.04394921156622338,"score_gpt":0.35007125667925887,"score_spread":0.3061220451130355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036731207","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808452,0.0006544123,0.012288043,0.0003247287,0.00008756741,0.00008795005,0.00013734505,0.00016379212,0.005410994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914608,0.00026288498,0.004799276,0.00016356184,0.00005031498,0.000041279018,0.0001544129,0.000037129386,0.0030302648],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998116,0.00044854195,0.00018541199,0.0003474047,0.0008010076,0.00010165069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97188145,0.018156331,0.005515564,0.0026887464,0.0011591495,0.00059873785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033368517,0.00050486095,0.0005579234,0.00067217054,0.00018480922,0.0005456658,0.00063542405,0.0017127002,0.002942217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032127444,0.00042179239,0.00026363065,0.00033085473,0.0011463828,0.0012793147,0.00077542977,0.0014415166,0.00046888064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028272387,0.0041461266,0.22392021,0.00066685874,0.0011670709,0.002625567,0.0018108267,0.0038381547,0.42983416,0.005883338,0.0025700883,0.2952652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036256367,0.0045511406,0.7517,0.0000560319,0.00038990087,0.006683819,0.00020866239,0.009435328,0.21150425,0.012877354,0.0020441497,0.00018677673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011371413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013388653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0033368517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003716844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033732437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017647147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037358448","doi":"10.1037/a0014555","title":"Additivity of factor effects in reading tasks is still a challenge for computational models: Reply to Ziegler, Perry, and Zorzi (2009).","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Connectionism; Reading aloud; Reading (process); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Computational model; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive science; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Artificial neural network; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0438009520018429,"score_gpt":0.35367573375699446,"score_spread":0.30987478175515154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037358448","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047116805,0.0045286324,0.0028934802,0.98642945,0.004951139,0.000003795029,0.00008436363,0.00012405783,0.00051392725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04879797,0.019111725,0.012711348,0.8541341,0.056732927,0.0001200863,0.00021222391,0.0003411105,0.00783856],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99612254,0.0011269895,0.00044236757,0.0010961469,0.0010625882,0.00014939571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9194041,0.062836185,0.0023513483,0.0046943203,0.009577289,0.0011367549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015595473,0.0015002042,0.002817232,0.001351552,0.0021525535,0.003585176,0.0069213836,0.014206003,0.005229571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061711207,0.0009012978,0.001772794,0.0013142239,0.010839022,0.018110843,0.0047158683,0.04154393,0.0050514834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016104462,0.000109460685,0.0011682588,0.00055821455,0.00013407924,0.00055054517,0.0014149352,0.0017778019,0.00041319878,0.10399009,0.8257029,0.06401941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013222906,0.00008302531,0.0020248033,0.0004966363,0.00010122201,0.001397761,0.0009321857,0.004969372,0.0008024218,0.7117677,0.27698085,0.00031177266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008421446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006032893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015595473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025098321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030134087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08247775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038228815","doi":"10.1037/a0035260","title":"Restless mind, restless body.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":107,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Mind-wandering; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Context (archaeology); Theory of mind; Metronome; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04824517221544549,"score_gpt":0.34004815723131204,"score_spread":0.29180298501586655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038228815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48613626,0.114802025,0.09934549,0.01742772,0.006062978,0.0003519276,0.0023511485,0.0014943184,0.27202815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9271437,0.009902107,0.0123861935,0.0047960053,0.0007884677,0.00018876766,0.00089212577,0.00012563022,0.043776996],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997974,0.000047503883,0.00001514031,0.0000672384,0.000047707596,0.000025047355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947995,0.00010319425,0.00017281786,0.000105617255,0.000051579733,0.00008689579],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045410573,0.00043934115,0.00022543933,0.00050889695,0.00041698013,0.0010007585,0.0004937845,0.0007617482,0.008535876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016800713,0.00010361839,0.00027268654,0.00028696898,0.0014952446,0.0012075745,0.00095781445,0.0007829735,0.0022140846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022621846,0.00054127123,0.03347257,0.001984408,0.00019493108,0.006550773,0.0057197423,0.00063629897,0.070370845,0.20597988,0.0472282,0.62505895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022171416,0.0019983745,0.21521801,0.00087067916,0.00027810963,0.05234422,0.0029207256,0.003249802,0.018991666,0.27548924,0.42825696,0.00016049598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050825265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006084238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008535876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002796804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029043457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028555274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038759377","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.163","title":"Effects of problem format on division and multiplication performance: Division facts are mediated via multiplication-based representations.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Multiplication (music); Arithmetic; Computer science; Mathematics; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.023720776033232513,"score_gpt":0.3317320187056858,"score_spread":0.3080112426724533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038759377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9880939,0.00024340377,0.0023908985,0.00012664225,0.000064426546,0.00013067738,0.00016427579,0.000071840455,0.00871382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988502,0.00027990367,0.007460771,0.000120169425,0.000040484705,0.0003088301,0.0002725494,0.00005127478,0.0029640098],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765295,0.00095789327,0.00021444866,0.00050834235,0.00054141827,0.0001250726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91203195,0.07493256,0.0073928204,0.00270933,0.0009971242,0.0019362598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002809986,0.00093425467,0.0005678864,0.0004491067,0.00021735285,0.002000484,0.0008118961,0.001035211,0.010452018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054990366,0.00058351894,0.00027164211,0.00026821753,0.00079821213,0.0037224493,0.0014184653,0.0014138833,0.0008794684],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.053969245,0.018204985,0.10731433,0.003157295,0.0007758084,0.0021666167,0.009659263,0.004384482,0.49839348,0.012437213,0.0027942623,0.28674307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006909227,0.04522044,0.658595,0.0007009733,0.0010967327,0.0049232556,0.002381645,0.028510125,0.20054473,0.03840746,0.012227979,0.000482497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034203264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025754658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010452018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033295038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039689403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034965515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039880978","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.399","title":"Multidimensional visual statistical learning.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Visual perception and processing mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Object (grammar); Colored; Artificial intelligence; Dimension (graph theory); Psychology; Pattern recognition (psychology); Color vision; Visual perception; Communication; Perception; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06998164169081789,"score_gpt":0.39034294806186776,"score_spread":0.32036130637104987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039880978","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03971567,0.006553359,0.9234239,0.0027040883,0.0003785535,0.00012375515,0.00078897213,0.0028693122,0.023442354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73023146,0.0035583307,0.2543519,0.000968477,0.0004349201,0.00023185776,0.0011654794,0.00039849264,0.008659076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994543,0.00017091153,0.000032029395,0.00014776652,0.00016975381,0.000025126596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99673444,0.0014886201,0.0004253043,0.0007983351,0.00035001046,0.00020326939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018928447,0.00041667637,0.00032318314,0.0009274367,0.00027540408,0.001300039,0.0007496957,0.00058034447,0.00583214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010689818,0.00027427392,0.00057022437,0.0006989447,0.0012726142,0.0026310007,0.0017723873,0.0012848508,0.0009857969],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026544376,0.00009435204,0.006940639,0.00062322203,0.00013451026,0.00014649294,0.00052708853,0.010771639,0.018340828,0.31172675,0.012543507,0.6378855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003392331,0.00014534121,0.010744363,0.00010987567,0.00003429887,0.0004941504,0.000107127926,0.16630697,0.009873621,0.78024924,0.031830605,0.00007043735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007032208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007738029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00583214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005753058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043894953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019510448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040297674","doi":"10.1037/a0019181","title":"Mental space travel: Damage to posterior parietal cortex prevents egocentric navigation and reexperiencing of remote spatial memories.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory and Neural Mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; Baycrest Hospital","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Marie Curie","keywords":"Landmark; Psychology; Spatial memory; Retrosplenial cortex; Posterior parietal cortex; Cognitive psychology; Spatial cognition; Path integration; Mental representation; Cognitive map; Spatial ability; Representation (politics); Hippocampus; Cognition; Neuroscience; Computer vision; Working memory; Computer science","score_opus":0.035791795609913864,"score_gpt":0.34539413813575937,"score_spread":0.3096023425258455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040297674","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99833256,0.00025747955,0.000564802,0.00004397883,0.00000978147,0.000013889191,0.00005596645,0.00004206639,0.00067949103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893254,0.000120544464,0.00020328179,0.000017078248,0.000003785628,0.000012674711,0.00011795133,0.0000051884135,0.0005868843],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99989676,0.000014197381,0.000007768106,0.000028937477,0.000020112073,0.000032180717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998344,0.000038974205,0.00003603071,0.00003236046,0.000007485995,0.00005077415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019656574,0.00059793005,0.00036822227,0.00043278324,0.00021062825,0.00023947237,0.00028513328,0.00045297298,0.002847477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041400045,0.00021047668,0.00026436005,0.00016043794,0.0010871436,0.00027484406,0.00038238266,0.0007661584,0.0004674993],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007028053,0.0024153728,0.012889416,0.0003158538,0.00033643475,0.0067832056,0.0004431787,0.00047769112,0.9119462,0.0011568507,0.00082561595,0.05538216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031742787,0.045390613,0.25118732,0.00010049821,0.00084223674,0.06465757,0.00070818985,0.0046743387,0.62068874,0.0019914412,0.0065219053,0.000062857915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010343086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089355925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002847477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018501164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002977923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009525716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040517851","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.736","title":"Auditory Attentional Capture During Serial Recall: Violations at Encoding of an Algorithm-Based Neural Model?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":153,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Interstimulus interval; Encoding (memory); Sequence (biology); Task (project management); Speech recognition; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Interval (graph theory); Algorithm; Mathematics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04286390773558718,"score_gpt":0.33629293389939785,"score_spread":0.29342902616381067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040517851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98970175,0.00023738266,0.0088656815,0.00010826242,0.000017796687,0.000026331465,0.000031024832,0.00007024108,0.0009414748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985266,0.000051880932,0.0012181124,0.000043385244,0.000008298843,0.000011086222,0.000027005284,0.000011387201,0.000102223596],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995567,0.00006106321,0.000052639127,0.00009173303,0.00017201323,0.00006569646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541,0.0017891568,0.0010176096,0.0014334619,0.00020039716,0.00014929082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008818439,0.0002541043,0.00037753946,0.0003285918,0.00016921622,0.00067827647,0.000561078,0.00063908694,0.00075132423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071727717,0.0003068539,0.0002397984,0.00023082121,0.0008455451,0.0008906365,0.00077724893,0.00070077553,0.00011275608],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026919805,0.00022136915,0.03193138,0.00017813245,0.00015394144,0.0008440296,0.0007637041,0.002330075,0.90231144,0.0026987628,0.00022609849,0.05564909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002915704,0.0026000105,0.66234994,0.000074023694,0.00024037556,0.004284306,0.00040703986,0.02750684,0.29288328,0.0079677785,0.001282198,0.00011260493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012027354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014230169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0012027354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037701524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025930803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004663706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040896074","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.508","title":"Linguistic Attention Control: Attention Shifting Governed by Grammaticized Elements of Language.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Task (project management); Sentence; Perspective (graphical); Operationalization; Function (biology); Cognition; Control (management); Psychology; Psycholinguistics; Attentional control; Dimension (graph theory); Cognitive psychology; Sentence processing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01909652546721243,"score_gpt":0.3344284609722716,"score_spread":0.31533193550505917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040896074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822072,0.0008052537,0.011719419,0.00041456308,0.00009932638,0.00009394244,0.000046668465,0.00005271362,0.0045610922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950185,0.00019975462,0.003449361,0.00023603112,0.000026700072,0.000096598065,0.000032559135,0.000012159281,0.00092822756],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995158,0.00013092443,0.000025879302,0.00016333433,0.00011540991,0.000048641934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796283,0.0011304226,0.00040995557,0.00022834423,0.00010186069,0.00016666889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001387444,0.0003557193,0.00022519442,0.00022733491,0.00021451189,0.00062310824,0.00041559758,0.0005205034,0.0012577742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045852894,0.00019448742,0.00020089936,0.00010617666,0.0008783086,0.00066968414,0.00049227383,0.00059155864,0.00012144839],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040900884,0.000993602,0.015192696,0.00032203406,0.0001328535,0.0003414745,0.0017304434,0.00071332237,0.860551,0.0073188795,0.00088719174,0.10772645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017924898,0.008737602,0.47858804,0.000095500814,0.00046356066,0.0019407886,0.0010070358,0.017710311,0.42957333,0.05001363,0.009909773,0.00016794019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010389488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009405194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001387444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005357637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025942104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00733763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041137022","doi":"10.1037/a0020598","title":"Global similarity predicts dissociation of classification and recognition: Evidence questioning the implicit–explicit learning distinction in amnesia.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Amnesia; Dissociation (chemistry); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Recognition memory; Episodic memory; sort; Similarity (geometry); Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Neuroscience; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.0696476657294998,"score_gpt":0.37122021761903395,"score_spread":0.30157255188953414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041137022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99813867,0.00011609036,0.00085242494,0.00009538738,0.0000051593233,0.000008697748,0.000047745183,0.000019212293,0.000716707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937326,0.00003250417,0.0003305736,0.000027069867,0.0000039869383,0.0000041939643,0.000055600678,0.0000062548916,0.00016664661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924445,0.000120303215,0.00009931591,0.00015700616,0.00031221038,0.000066753586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885789,0.004102051,0.0029669865,0.0029305024,0.00041969641,0.0010019956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021901596,0.00025006512,0.00041099955,0.00080012134,0.00015115229,0.00082939636,0.0005290088,0.00073864707,0.0016842498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011373376,0.00051954895,0.0002192994,0.00025973932,0.0021805242,0.001309988,0.001531399,0.0012203279,0.00027940932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052809883,0.0013238682,0.53751624,0.00024009573,0.0003062764,0.000842054,0.0026914128,0.0007703467,0.38305405,0.0032598488,0.00067420886,0.06404058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005826574,0.0006728248,0.96903884,0.000009303964,0.00004597881,0.0011099466,0.00017743824,0.0015388964,0.023085097,0.004012048,0.00023154849,0.000019863546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011424408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011747876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021901596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029614283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025801625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011582792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042342114","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1208","title":"A spatial modality effect in serial memory.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Modality (human–computer interaction); Serial position effect; Modality effect; Cognitive psychology; Spatial memory; Psychology; Task (project management); Visual memory; Short-term memory; Echoic memory; Computer science; Communication; Working memory; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Neuroscience; Recall","score_opus":0.02475208457723381,"score_gpt":0.3323320636392375,"score_spread":0.3075799790620037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042342114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95433766,0.0033444662,0.00902479,0.00028918378,0.00021143563,0.000085060914,0.0002737924,0.00021799674,0.0322156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911016,0.000859459,0.0036304502,0.00021417532,0.00009568415,0.00003260075,0.00014730754,0.00003762629,0.0038809597],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963987,0.000076572775,0.000033648208,0.00009326201,0.00013708117,0.000019592957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98994,0.0066222483,0.0012433697,0.0013087565,0.00050895783,0.0003767102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012978653,0.0003784403,0.00028172447,0.00041822938,0.00012311614,0.0004963994,0.000514351,0.0005306992,0.010267812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009795783,0.0002204369,0.0003160757,0.00021072227,0.00078642584,0.001425564,0.0005315725,0.00060624816,0.00072332704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010210282,0.0011463733,0.024217755,0.0013863482,0.00025098768,0.00090513873,0.0009208588,0.0012365669,0.7537736,0.019645877,0.0011284197,0.18517782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008416127,0.01654088,0.48970085,0.00027468792,0.00077498023,0.00532549,0.00032109325,0.005515471,0.41770878,0.04967457,0.013185506,0.00013605847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031321394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005300546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010267812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022914636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017931104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034349322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044623314","doi":"10.1037/a0034109","title":"Hyper-binding across time: Age differences in the effect of temporal proximity on paired-associate learning.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Psychology; Associative learning; Distraction; Task (project management); Developmental psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04074303206898623,"score_gpt":0.33641983380792784,"score_spread":0.2956768017389416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044623314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99791485,0.00042940018,0.0005684022,0.000034124772,0.000020667028,0.000010303339,0.00020174123,0.0000143722245,0.00080613303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983209,0.00017460073,0.00048015502,0.000049465394,0.000009109091,0.000011959797,0.00015647631,0.000009795302,0.0007874921],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966013,0.00003831355,0.000042997708,0.0001196345,0.0001039928,0.000034877437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749714,0.0005442288,0.0011324572,0.00030281942,0.00019943024,0.0003238542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007727539,0.00031201736,0.00030489077,0.0004784822,0.00014002195,0.00036989822,0.00021382209,0.000394766,0.0021431046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002754295,0.00022813311,0.00018381348,0.00016921881,0.00032602058,0.00052806747,0.0005455275,0.0006263034,0.00033119274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004273804,0.0010274022,0.28184664,0.0002579927,0.00021586647,0.0013871042,0.0021528765,0.00020363896,0.66042966,0.00038529586,0.0006685603,0.04715108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020844678,0.0017751135,0.9717174,0.000014400691,0.00007156389,0.0016214922,0.0002260392,0.00023658994,0.023149803,0.00026479337,0.0008860632,0.0000159373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082575943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009971847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021431046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116939416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012128578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0071694255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044654152","doi":"10.1037/a0021328","title":"Tip-of-the-tongue states reveal age differences in the syllable frequency effect.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Syllable; Phonology; Psychology; Audiology; Word lists by frequency; Speech production; Incidence (geometry); Linguistics; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06999025108180336,"score_gpt":0.3156712088566176,"score_spread":0.24568095777481425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044654152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99712354,0.0005948292,0.00039749523,0.00001501342,0.000014394846,0.000015072627,0.0003158813,0.000009387116,0.0015144555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981699,0.00027087433,0.00046763287,0.000031367075,0.000009141912,0.000022985087,0.00030781497,0.0000087144435,0.0007115551],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973243,0.00003653499,0.0000414707,0.000084703555,0.00007806019,0.00002681866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675876,0.001321499,0.0012108088,0.00022408448,0.00028186585,0.00020302327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006427532,0.0002217261,0.0001752165,0.0006130554,0.000116959156,0.00037282798,0.00015173049,0.00030579756,0.0023956934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036354735,0.00018109042,0.00022025053,0.00022878574,0.00023042981,0.00038357527,0.00043781096,0.00029317348,0.00042868694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025039688,0.00031256015,0.7544599,0.0003924647,0.0001958684,0.0010618559,0.0043734754,0.00011026303,0.18629472,0.00034454896,0.0005081928,0.049442254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044133076,0.00034214766,0.99570423,0.000008978445,0.000032589876,0.0004367965,0.00022011546,0.00006053366,0.002760381,0.00008494109,0.00033938955,0.0000056129757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006958871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011442178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023956934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008280131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011393015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008014381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044906258","doi":"10.1037/a0013080","title":"Why does selective attention to parts fail in face processing?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"National Eye Institute; James S. McDonnell Foundation","keywords":"Perception; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Face (sociological concept); Cued speech; Matching (statistics); Face perception; Encoding (memory); Test (biology); Information processing; Mechanism (biology); Selective attention; Computer science; Cognition; Neuroscience; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05055329771293975,"score_gpt":0.34917455586213497,"score_spread":0.2986212581491952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044906258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93184865,0.0033803273,0.03641616,0.0149531,0.0006638879,0.000103450526,0.00020389615,0.0009890201,0.01144152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896713,0.0006944832,0.0047432506,0.002981869,0.00016833203,0.000039965587,0.000108554465,0.000111883346,0.001480423],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991418,0.000063127554,0.00006802879,0.00034406356,0.00025103855,0.00013192947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409676,0.0025323112,0.00074180425,0.0015634972,0.0006130099,0.0004525985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024004583,0.00049561483,0.00088663533,0.0005357859,0.00034548927,0.0011576556,0.0012297771,0.0023733578,0.002224533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013180538,0.00051205064,0.00047541066,0.0003205986,0.0024822766,0.0034406912,0.0010892168,0.0012415508,0.00082567014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025475642,0.0005525469,0.10340839,0.00077063084,0.0003839093,0.0029432178,0.0012323263,0.0016083989,0.3880994,0.015449047,0.00923474,0.4737699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043320152,0.0025723327,0.5441694,0.0002189001,0.0004025567,0.013069627,0.001850068,0.021880928,0.23909888,0.16104527,0.015021959,0.0002369187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014163319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011252841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0024004583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005561297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035753121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0126950145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047405250","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.51","title":"Interactive Effects of Numerical Surface Form and Operand Parity in Cognitive Arithmetic.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Operand; Arithmetic; Parity (physics); Multiplication (music); Numerical digit; Numerical cognition; Mathematics; Arabic numerals; Cognition; Simple (philosophy); Encoding (memory); Word (group theory); Computer science; Psychology; Combinatorics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.025765240844029293,"score_gpt":0.3643069908749809,"score_spread":0.3385417500309516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047405250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985298,0.000060488033,0.0002862403,0.000022505246,0.0000038922367,0.000009211645,0.000033212007,0.000009717604,0.0010449297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802774,0.000046121728,0.0014035513,0.00002451661,0.0000050671692,0.000024548852,0.000060798753,0.000010389306,0.00039721213],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993007,0.00030020258,0.000047088688,0.00013779,0.00016429034,0.00004990947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98975766,0.0077388547,0.0011071134,0.00038337903,0.00026881366,0.0007442419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007117056,0.00037580996,0.00025074245,0.00024730453,0.0001346725,0.0006012958,0.0001984423,0.00026909867,0.0032749572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012027975,0.00024092205,0.00015137818,0.00012904489,0.00062686176,0.00068176084,0.00081995985,0.00050087506,0.00025434283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022761717,0.004050504,0.21853477,0.00046234878,0.00018043625,0.0015601764,0.0052048475,0.0010710799,0.6102577,0.0033100357,0.00048675764,0.13211958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051288924,0.0062003285,0.9382467,0.00003102347,0.00020363517,0.0012533854,0.00061161845,0.0029953092,0.045431443,0.003073722,0.0013889262,0.000051020532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045638814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007979342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032749572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017732685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022886274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010955811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047417538","doi":"10.1037/a0023923","title":"The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Recall; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Memory span; Working memory; Span (engineering); Psychology; Episodic memory; Reading (process); Computer science; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.09369885132998274,"score_gpt":0.3387197660229352,"score_spread":0.24502091469295245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047417538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948138,0.0005560347,0.0019400016,0.000043069947,0.000013085154,0.000029278472,0.000051347695,0.0000151720105,0.0025382098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956938,0.00035885314,0.003071624,0.000041260337,0.000012650038,0.000037228,0.00011020693,0.000015440697,0.0006587227],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993924,0.00017083967,0.00005718146,0.00012943744,0.00020876153,0.000041374165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563086,0.0030354136,0.0006391649,0.0002917733,0.00020133362,0.00020153497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000737605,0.0002932976,0.00024288803,0.00028465496,0.000111069254,0.00091138756,0.00033721793,0.00026701423,0.0010476146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067741415,0.0002080933,0.00017564103,0.00013394443,0.0004416165,0.0005534057,0.0005359207,0.00057997345,0.00013291994],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048513915,0.0004854823,0.014981043,0.00024239729,0.00015489978,0.00014466958,0.0009970536,0.00026947996,0.92967325,0.00071081985,0.00010051147,0.047388993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000252268,0.007101039,0.46227556,0.00009103942,0.00037495486,0.00081854727,0.00043756847,0.002162246,0.5199693,0.003915639,0.0025200145,0.00008187147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038268242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044735873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0010476146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024818914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013524143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0039008856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047431063","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1001","title":"Selective and Nonselective Transfer: Positive and Negative Priming in a Multiple-Task Environment.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Priming (agriculture); Cognitive psychology; Prime (order theory); Information processing; Communication; Cognition; Neuroscience; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.06307846187906818,"score_gpt":0.34639274753172533,"score_spread":0.28331428565265715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047431063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905681,0.00007549366,0.0026083943,0.00011711905,0.000060041,0.00007349659,0.000043007527,0.00008719983,0.006367237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99703336,0.00004168292,0.0015051241,0.00012063021,0.000022127817,0.00008210465,0.000039565926,0.000051453717,0.0011040309],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993948,0.00015885186,0.000029508596,0.00018940034,0.00014379977,0.000083572886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981311,0.0009902534,0.00022417394,0.00023292759,0.00007974856,0.00034179154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011131373,0.00051473995,0.00038809679,0.00030225358,0.00019251677,0.00034078897,0.00048342865,0.0005913616,0.0036073169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046092616,0.00034195735,0.00018073214,0.00009499104,0.0010096446,0.00070470746,0.0009505765,0.0010889891,0.00041644883],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037023243,0.0011212468,0.00177349,0.00013414648,0.000023389324,0.00039136535,0.0003239243,0.00013854657,0.9730936,0.0022746853,0.00030588702,0.016717335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011851232,0.010612917,0.20158371,0.00006751119,0.00021363662,0.006521953,0.00037204934,0.009407052,0.7394699,0.027474176,0.002967927,0.00012391312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011224897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013278934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036073169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022431217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024141707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012067616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047536147","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.891","title":"The Perception of Integrality: Remembering Through the Validation of Expectation.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Perception; Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Encoding (memory); Social psychology; Natural language processing; Computer science; Mathematics; Statistics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.06099984087195215,"score_gpt":0.3689881236643469,"score_spread":0.30798828279239476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047536147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9930114,0.00025901146,0.0035814962,0.00017755124,0.00002410924,0.000015193911,0.000028730648,0.000022095226,0.002880379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981968,0.00007572509,0.0013998593,0.000054928492,0.000005018264,0.0000088450615,0.000025541076,0.000006592063,0.00022670875],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939203,0.0003074993,0.00003940798,0.00010909549,0.00011246767,0.000039442122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99050385,0.006808489,0.0012259518,0.0007743958,0.00026311856,0.0004241516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016389171,0.00020245233,0.00020856508,0.00017198708,0.00017679656,0.00085088634,0.00029132506,0.00060239114,0.0016550252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021619128,0.0002059807,0.00012506818,0.000090547066,0.0009940307,0.0013494311,0.0006098459,0.00078208453,0.00010948907],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007796232,0.0006284294,0.078285865,0.00082204724,0.00023490775,0.0007361496,0.0076235463,0.0011044404,0.7466832,0.015031602,0.0008755092,0.14017805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045796385,0.010625222,0.60465854,0.0002600992,0.00071838114,0.002667658,0.0041535497,0.012666398,0.291978,0.06548747,0.006081155,0.00024563278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027636177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030746622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016550252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018116174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014283498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008667529},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047684761","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.1005","title":"When lust is lost: Orthographic similarity effects in the encoding and reconstruction of rapidly presented word lists.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Encoding (memory); Word (group theory); Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Speech recognition; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03349230395325823,"score_gpt":0.3213901349986168,"score_spread":0.28789783104535854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047684761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98619395,0.0005632551,0.0065972675,0.00028524845,0.000045515953,0.00003945838,0.000069818525,0.00010766206,0.0060977987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936731,0.00022809609,0.0047729313,0.0001441226,0.000021590464,0.000027838427,0.00009306817,0.000043717875,0.0009956228],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986084,0.00029065245,0.00010490425,0.00028329392,0.00063159165,0.00008114308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912179,0.0035436952,0.0025247973,0.0017706822,0.00046936798,0.00047352252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013437069,0.00032310147,0.00028615972,0.00054379815,0.00025804946,0.0013400939,0.00060492614,0.0007212527,0.0017271528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020580994,0.0004604553,0.00022439795,0.0003140548,0.0011939354,0.0027564778,0.0014897166,0.00097083073,0.00029814854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006819517,0.00061046996,0.026673745,0.0004176339,0.0001885325,0.0010078709,0.0035183737,0.00094973977,0.8385779,0.00944129,0.0005565933,0.11123828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045732412,0.0071982904,0.48926237,0.00014584194,0.0005076228,0.004037178,0.0017780473,0.0108518815,0.43945453,0.04157525,0.0045135543,0.0002181221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008433605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012911293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017271528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004391948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044186309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007106304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048479537","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.520","title":"Divided Attention in Younger and Older Adults: Effects of Strategy and Relatedness on Memory Performance and Secondary Task Costs.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Psychology; Encoding (memory); Task (project management); Cued speech; Latency (audio); Cued recall; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Free recall; Computer science","score_opus":0.014148925525671697,"score_gpt":0.29303526379660977,"score_spread":0.27888633827093806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048479537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991767,0.00029995127,0.000070503615,0.000020412328,0.0000073960146,0.000007813537,0.0000418585,0.0000024057874,0.0003730345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895096,0.00013797212,0.00018105489,0.00007014173,0.000013572875,0.00001612926,0.00008749023,0.000002264978,0.0005404107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998196,0.000030017243,0.000026000487,0.000047520436,0.000053407468,0.000023497729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770385,0.000787291,0.00063590053,0.00015708331,0.00016081626,0.000555046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008714022,0.00042049563,0.0004089832,0.00043541845,0.00015840918,0.0004340701,0.00017320723,0.00044219804,0.0014814071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004237716,0.0001834124,0.00020461848,0.0001652768,0.00025417312,0.00045822337,0.00037060597,0.00039820737,0.00025580855],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033201315,0.0050142207,0.7634084,0.0002262314,0.00054129265,0.0011704605,0.0042103217,0.0002758166,0.08792778,0.00036184612,0.00085231103,0.1028099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019761479,0.003818474,0.99216133,0.0000071932527,0.00009048577,0.00045298578,0.00022939309,0.00023585623,0.0022481866,0.0002722757,0.00027436882,0.00001187651],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016887811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022182844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016887811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023841823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013053545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004955828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048480914","doi":"10.1037/a0016273","title":"Use of self-to-object and object-to-object spatial relations in locomotion.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Object (grammar); Representation (politics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Object-based spatial database; Artificial intelligence; Computer vision; Computer science; Spatial relation; Method; Object relations theory; Psychology; Mathematics; Spatial analysis; Object-oriented programming; Spatial database","score_opus":0.02090434229319563,"score_gpt":0.29335555944491504,"score_spread":0.2724512171517194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048480914","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99746966,0.00009018452,0.0019441894,0.000014986654,0.000004034469,0.0000140167385,0.000017801625,0.000019258134,0.00042593514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993944,0.00007983379,0.0055022133,0.000015402924,9.549279e-7,0.000018690938,0.00004289609,0.000005743063,0.00039033598],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997435,0.00006709834,0.000028628023,0.00008644981,0.000051469247,0.000022883643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981192,0.0006521097,0.00047861692,0.00041491273,0.00020305817,0.00013213196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062374637,0.00028152874,0.00018682885,0.00017927274,0.000117174815,0.00038616886,0.00022032509,0.00032103076,0.0008105117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003460584,0.00017278807,0.00014816417,0.00007951066,0.0005241725,0.00048573516,0.0004211084,0.00026263666,0.00009267583],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015149245,0.00066174264,0.05915289,0.00041830182,0.0001133591,0.00011314675,0.0021014349,0.0010868745,0.8378178,0.00042946468,0.0001707701,0.09641924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001812593,0.007487287,0.734874,0.00007290042,0.00020727763,0.0006492823,0.0012064534,0.0053699827,0.24477588,0.0018714477,0.0032083588,0.00009581382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045207402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011119801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008105117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015531004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001751988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0032987595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048795359","doi":"10.1037/a0018785","title":"The production effect: Delineation of a phenomenon.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":381,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Optimal distinctiveness theory; Language production; Production (economics); Cognitive psychology; Reading (process); Discriminative model; Word (group theory); Read aloud; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Cognition; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02538511392989057,"score_gpt":0.3396112209100612,"score_spread":0.3142261069801706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048795359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67538387,0.0096308105,0.2273576,0.0034780235,0.0012158676,0.0019402687,0.0011680508,0.0017690153,0.078056484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655667,0.00067522895,0.02671488,0.0017306174,0.00040243065,0.00067016314,0.00031605162,0.00038522895,0.0035387215],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99399465,0.0024031394,0.000565823,0.0015922495,0.0012455808,0.00019857616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9430893,0.043631475,0.004358112,0.006601881,0.0015004246,0.0008187514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009136941,0.0006940385,0.00080169545,0.00078256696,0.00040111167,0.00085171853,0.00099532,0.0013598935,0.005472113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033346117,0.00061851466,0.0007592063,0.00028822946,0.0030705347,0.0024129958,0.002866334,0.0022255164,0.00070196704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014393936,0.0021865482,0.037300747,0.003578179,0.0005521965,0.001516573,0.0026564177,0.0010352223,0.6433335,0.04966693,0.0030812416,0.2406985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002290597,0.025870612,0.31395835,0.00054436445,0.001354053,0.013359469,0.00056744716,0.007261849,0.54278475,0.06059442,0.031077955,0.0003360654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024831106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002584242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009136941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038403462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042624446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048321366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051630209","doi":"10.1037/a0015901","title":"Lexical competition during second-language listening: Sentence context, but not proficiency, constrains interference from the native lexicon.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Amgen (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Sentence; Psychology; Noun; Lexicon; Sentence processing; Language proficiency; Competition (biology); First language; History","score_opus":0.036864161312725865,"score_gpt":0.3334638276770666,"score_spread":0.29659966636434076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051630209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980964,0.00007487853,0.0007693351,0.0000107712785,0.0000027160554,0.0000065433746,0.000032505886,0.000009451727,0.0009974593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998762,0.000050112056,0.0007525782,0.000022720204,0.0000042981837,0.00003139643,0.00008869542,0.00001970187,0.00026852856],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997855,0.000046194415,0.000012656809,0.0000700349,0.000051198225,0.00003438706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998825,0.0007271094,0.00018837285,0.00006490911,0.000088718785,0.00010586519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027187943,0.00023726444,0.00023298274,0.00020546971,0.00019217894,0.00043118326,0.00017361944,0.00018903846,0.0011638702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032292425,0.00025375182,0.00011023653,0.000109771216,0.00032227486,0.0004217783,0.0005294671,0.00022372225,0.00014517711],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005365702,0.000049787224,0.010585265,0.000067712106,0.00002002851,0.0001148955,0.0005714506,0.000064074855,0.9790052,0.000110827306,0.000058959264,0.008815143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008231078,0.00077913445,0.8748621,0.000022570064,0.00007643835,0.00067977153,0.0005991924,0.0022096604,0.11920542,0.0007733979,0.00067728927,0.00003284288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020464484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057514138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020464484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021073091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029739086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00406909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052284639","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.623","title":"The activation of phonological representations by bilinguals while reading silently: Evidence from interlingual homophones.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Homophone; Psychology; Linguistics; Phonology; Reading (process); Neuroscience of multilingualism; Phonetics; Lexical decision task; Contrast (vision); Cognitive psychology; Indo-European languages; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.04667709323657768,"score_gpt":0.3897029244470539,"score_spread":0.34302583121047625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052284639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99894637,0.000051462306,0.00018067357,0.000016930426,0.0000030149224,0.0000034768889,0.000021041078,0.0000056268505,0.00077137456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982389,0.00008971233,0.0007142392,0.00004690302,0.0000035477174,0.000012712985,0.00008335857,0.000013953085,0.00079663796],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998037,0.000049446593,0.000014741506,0.000048789487,0.000047362053,0.000036008412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991154,0.00038574098,0.00019218508,0.00007420348,0.00010175877,0.00013074774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025312428,0.00018632754,0.00017123112,0.00019766447,0.00017371318,0.00030592733,0.000111019595,0.00025115637,0.0019530458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012967348,0.0001876197,0.000086877255,0.00009805115,0.00039298227,0.0002790305,0.0004030256,0.0003255314,0.00027253604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073362025,0.00013273122,0.0076741767,0.000077201796,0.000013962617,0.00022600015,0.0012295971,0.000014438917,0.983043,0.00010897627,0.000047481066,0.0066988296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018576781,0.0030267488,0.65885645,0.000033961882,0.0001035647,0.0024867752,0.002426893,0.000664268,0.32977852,0.00067193474,0.001727676,0.00003742497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008798526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028025925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019530458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012342905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019378531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006533563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054705500","doi":"10.1037/a0019178","title":"On the joint effects of stimulus quality, regularity, and lexicality when reading aloud: New challenges.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Reading aloud; Cognitive psychology; Spelling; Read aloud; Cognition; Linguistics; Communication; Speech recognition; Computer science; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.05805687421297472,"score_gpt":0.36862271545095393,"score_spread":0.3105658412379792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054705500","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17414758,0.014654673,0.7226116,0.05212169,0.0010749843,0.00021867098,0.00073938206,0.0010127157,0.03341878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81009865,0.009905979,0.16471073,0.0068476684,0.0012780811,0.00060646184,0.00053350016,0.00067258393,0.005346388],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535155,0.0019328375,0.00030135823,0.0012972363,0.0009837602,0.00013322715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9282309,0.06009394,0.0023607966,0.0067399745,0.0019591516,0.0006153163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01123642,0.0011112785,0.0023877693,0.0011100143,0.00070699863,0.004684841,0.0038101187,0.0021676982,0.008061877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05846832,0.00096279307,0.0010170949,0.0011538519,0.0069106417,0.017973395,0.0045918887,0.00395661,0.001477706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008252437,0.0008642602,0.02236801,0.0020423383,0.0009785009,0.000958589,0.0054291897,0.050498575,0.022380164,0.508701,0.011234111,0.37372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009481649,0.000271068,0.011362749,0.0001686641,0.00014078927,0.0004882888,0.00080990896,0.122363865,0.003296011,0.84942406,0.011371705,0.00020808853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029700722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028255845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01123642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083614845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017360011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05942452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058225279","doi":"10.1037/a0026976","title":"A processing approach to the working memory/long-term memory distinction: Evidence from the levels-of-processing span task.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Recall; Working memory; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Surprise; Short-term memory; Rhyme; Affect (linguistics); Levels-of-processing effect; Information processing; Cognition; Communication; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.15151879766857634,"score_gpt":0.3740736276982946,"score_spread":0.22255483002971826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058225279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95177954,0.0036916197,0.027942717,0.0004926175,0.000091820504,0.00010466279,0.0002833989,0.00007887894,0.015534691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98526025,0.0017426626,0.01056862,0.00048091295,0.00007275786,0.00011483057,0.00029098702,0.00002867653,0.0014403639],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973243,0.000054885393,0.000023655763,0.00007954462,0.000094681905,0.0000149315165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99664056,0.0015527616,0.0008409246,0.0005313897,0.00021450766,0.00021992526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008758949,0.0003453979,0.00016851226,0.00040263604,0.000119807126,0.00049933174,0.0004829733,0.0004080867,0.0021029306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003732059,0.00019726834,0.00017359263,0.0002136344,0.0009439551,0.00097273896,0.0007277913,0.0010239966,0.00037383626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046677743,0.0018786568,0.027617663,0.00094878767,0.00030660772,0.00052607217,0.0011089363,0.0004307321,0.75941503,0.011594431,0.00083724066,0.19066802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035529683,0.007936652,0.64139766,0.00020703302,0.00032081132,0.004008494,0.0003164569,0.0025642924,0.28941238,0.041838758,0.011552376,0.00008983114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022854393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025053383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021029306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000150375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018273127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007035017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058727618","doi":"10.1037/a0016566","title":"Evidence of anticipatory eye movements in the spatial Hebb repetition effect: Insights for modeling sequence learning.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Recall; Sequence learning; Sequence (biology); Eye movement; Cognitive psychology; Movement (music); Psychology; Speech recognition; Task (project management); Presentation (obstetrics); Serial position effect; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Communication; Free recall; Linguistics","score_opus":0.22190359311599153,"score_gpt":0.45544382193646243,"score_spread":0.2335402288204709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058727618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7836974,0.00058331626,0.21143867,0.00020169005,0.000034512304,0.000044734792,0.000062428604,0.00035618423,0.0035810217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865476,0.00015859593,0.012784094,0.000014038838,0.0000057245143,0.000015246254,0.000030113948,0.000013437128,0.00043115902],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988663,0.000026343836,0.0000069195903,0.000034609795,0.000034359724,0.000011171087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884003,0.0006407675,0.0002446811,0.00018563833,0.00005799096,0.000030893254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004873858,0.0002872345,0.00020660381,0.00018781229,0.00012458302,0.00029062017,0.0005828436,0.00065381307,0.0010162537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032287317,0.00023830915,0.00035964302,0.00012877409,0.0003155611,0.0007146111,0.00023497982,0.00056684465,0.00015462944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006301467,0.00039429497,0.020936146,0.0002449465,0.00017616169,0.00089595275,0.0004263721,0.07080275,0.8289023,0.023076924,0.0003288641,0.053185172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007714902,0.0010898256,0.07644081,0.000032363438,0.0001328903,0.0013128617,0.00008403929,0.72926515,0.15972605,0.030031707,0.0017154089,0.00009177475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009609409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010000732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0010162537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018742873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022229615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0033997297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060674554","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.615","title":"Testing Theories of Recognition Memory by Predicting Performance Across Paradigms.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Variance (accounting); Two-alternative forced choice; Psychology; Process (computing); Detection theory; Cognitive psychology; Flexibility (engineering); Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Computer science; Statistics","score_opus":0.051452646342462625,"score_gpt":0.34097787260957435,"score_spread":0.28952522626711175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060674554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88100594,0.0003628461,0.114004835,0.0003455729,0.000105930405,0.0002206428,0.0002507632,0.00047868377,0.0032247817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672624,0.00014064096,0.031237815,0.00020624636,0.00003645996,0.00020072398,0.00049283134,0.000045659042,0.00037727063],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946032,0.0024067822,0.00038419396,0.0016241823,0.0008180863,0.00016352333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91170216,0.06621511,0.008544966,0.010019584,0.002713125,0.00080501207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015836969,0.0014665695,0.00093900535,0.0013752877,0.00030129697,0.0022605031,0.0017204422,0.0019332267,0.0013381247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10078334,0.0005584285,0.0012794287,0.0008736386,0.00088224316,0.0039817044,0.0015773651,0.001675562,0.0008779667],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006423141,0.0048165815,0.47217277,0.00066919427,0.0046687694,0.00023694165,0.0014116382,0.064148635,0.07254792,0.014560186,0.001699008,0.3566452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035232096,0.0058453255,0.14724572,0.00006369972,0.00058204687,0.00043182584,0.00028465642,0.75570023,0.03855905,0.049625646,0.0011308827,0.00017864908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014921324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091360643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015836969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001010001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056623097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0837549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061552568","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1431","title":"Relation availability was not confounded with familiarity or plausibility in Gagné and Shoben (1997): Comment on Wisniewski and Murphy (2005).","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Relation (database); Phrase; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.03262812095320073,"score_gpt":0.32581819497411074,"score_spread":0.29319007402091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061552568","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015031125,0.0046284893,0.0058558313,0.925224,0.02751398,0.000102581456,0.000952234,0.00054376916,0.020147933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23852113,0.0032947683,0.009410393,0.6714684,0.034307186,0.00035377784,0.00034399424,0.00033578326,0.041964628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585634,0.00061365706,0.000486678,0.0009015221,0.0018610596,0.0002806126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96123165,0.022568982,0.0027105256,0.0017566467,0.01097887,0.00075330806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00621471,0.0008000039,0.000875879,0.0007909562,0.0029077192,0.0024461043,0.004149344,0.013544509,0.008949578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04094341,0.0005427853,0.0008290688,0.00056782877,0.0029116177,0.0041248617,0.0017589001,0.009578103,0.005872984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010736369,0.00030424603,0.011043515,0.0005573234,0.00006958173,0.0031066362,0.0052004266,0.00030674678,0.005974442,0.04745157,0.88283116,0.042080652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003741973,0.00047446913,0.09321195,0.0006461148,0.00022040511,0.005717108,0.004326449,0.0039566914,0.016676541,0.094160035,0.7797734,0.00046262975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017658817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019914009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017658817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027853823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015989847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035112083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062360626","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.451","title":"Qualitative differences between the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in reading aloud and lexical decision: Extensions to Yap and Balota (2007).","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Mental lexicon; Psychology; Lexicon; Word lists by frequency; Reading aloud; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Cognition; Lexical access; Dissociation (chemistry); Word recognition; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.09279954718248058,"score_gpt":0.4420131394747053,"score_spread":0.3492135922922247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062360626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640555,0.00069796684,0.019321805,0.00030205224,0.000041628125,0.00018293124,0.00037433722,0.0001334815,0.014890414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355376,0.000117915406,0.0036145693,0.00011875775,0.000009599515,0.0000945566,0.00009455687,0.00004174733,0.0023546056],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995197,0.00011637046,0.000025631132,0.00012155367,0.00018252675,0.00003418373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951953,0.0033739612,0.00055450865,0.00042825777,0.00030802598,0.00013993845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085185166,0.00015923742,0.0001622188,0.00039861075,0.00013112792,0.0007907207,0.00035397863,0.0003639509,0.007100213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006708421,0.00022518971,0.0003773322,0.0003843855,0.000667519,0.00081662834,0.00060968456,0.0005055481,0.00051124406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026812167,0.000875301,0.032700706,0.00076489,0.00010530375,0.0007482506,0.0043795174,0.0009997032,0.85151064,0.011048391,0.00072582474,0.093460225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121098245,0.0012261261,0.8798633,0.000037997946,0.00012590074,0.0013703239,0.000946999,0.0049134586,0.08949577,0.018982673,0.0028464168,0.000069878115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072901684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00077538507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007100213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032010995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026836793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02375263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064290905","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.687","title":"Actions and Affordances in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":314,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders","keywords":"Utterance; Affordance; Action (physics); Task (project management); Computer science; Ambiguity; Phrase; Ambiguity resolution; Animacy; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Resolution (logic); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.05841317230877644,"score_gpt":0.3686186348316274,"score_spread":0.3102054625228509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064290905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95008624,0.0016355703,0.032681864,0.0006914215,0.000075315125,0.00004125685,0.00006170035,0.00020045917,0.014526104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98974496,0.00022002825,0.009454349,0.00005631807,0.0000073949213,0.00001885358,0.000023231956,0.0000235891,0.0004512829],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895453,0.0004239853,0.00007832512,0.0002274018,0.00022844996,0.00008724401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954932,0.0026166576,0.0011586514,0.00034310215,0.00017386493,0.00021456108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018940882,0.0004354014,0.00022541913,0.0003563647,0.00036191923,0.001203059,0.00032795052,0.0009760439,0.0013061352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013104235,0.00043819973,0.00029899713,0.0001334662,0.0016633968,0.0020703035,0.0012247056,0.00066860835,0.00014223249],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022552204,0.00022096578,0.03170451,0.0009882677,0.00013740269,0.0019586764,0.01939524,0.004816839,0.68995476,0.09437425,0.00071564445,0.1534782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006342551,0.0027550338,0.29738587,0.00044568765,0.0005994232,0.006074028,0.008516874,0.061203316,0.21715905,0.3812382,0.023544589,0.0004436534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064138795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064186525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018940882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041822594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002983806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010016978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067758538","doi":"10.1037/a0025056","title":"Retrieval-induced forgetting of arithmetic facts.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Multiplication (music); Retrieval-induced forgetting; Arithmetic; Forgetting; Semantic memory; Word (group theory); Numerical digit; Computer science; Psychology; Cognition; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Combinatorics","score_opus":0.09627909631899567,"score_gpt":0.362959608308513,"score_spread":0.2666805119895173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067758538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99029505,0.0010535659,0.00652371,0.000044816126,0.000038115493,0.000110116685,0.00014301743,0.00010974849,0.0016817786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99514353,0.0003318315,0.003147402,0.000059362454,0.000020276244,0.000059691887,0.000309329,0.000020935227,0.0009076979],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995061,0.00008499881,0.00006210353,0.000117684125,0.00017024038,0.000058800186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99473614,0.0023001079,0.0013201137,0.0010530143,0.00033225695,0.00025833742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008906412,0.0003778059,0.00041704156,0.00031410955,0.00010523742,0.00036530208,0.00044525025,0.00029406225,0.002088021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065349173,0.00017901858,0.0003281926,0.00018954293,0.0003737828,0.00069927354,0.0005747911,0.0006217485,0.00031431566],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024670097,0.0005842568,0.017990729,0.00091306446,0.00016976205,0.0005813003,0.0005212807,0.00061253173,0.8870013,0.00067519624,0.0002799087,0.08820371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026602196,0.012439301,0.24607551,0.00010934222,0.00033452673,0.0038698548,0.00024126314,0.008003868,0.72203434,0.002988912,0.003550183,0.000086753076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026634123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038856847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002088021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017698832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021495187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069850683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070777755","doi":"10.1037/a0024070","title":"Cultural differences in strategic behavior: A study in computational estimation.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Task (project management); Chinese language; Adaptive strategies; Estimation; Psychology; Selection (genetic algorithm); Resource (disambiguation); Encoding (memory); Working memory; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Cognition; Artificial intelligence; History","score_opus":0.16007507755606906,"score_gpt":0.4006834452635539,"score_spread":0.2406083677074848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070777755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990652,0.00009927661,0.000092273185,0.000026685711,0.0000026276584,0.000003999512,0.000010980921,4.8759165e-7,0.00069847924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992995,0.000113372356,0.0001637928,0.000052494357,0.0000037490827,0.0000070253686,0.000024515006,0.0000020518235,0.00033337565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994516,0.00019884712,0.000050118208,0.0001149722,0.00013125004,0.00005309889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421763,0.0021344777,0.0015935659,0.0008165433,0.0006057736,0.0006319971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001431721,0.00028253897,0.0002466304,0.0006944064,0.0004407903,0.0010523525,0.00030070005,0.0003455316,0.0016393876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068418784,0.00024326137,0.00024355613,0.0006973472,0.0009926907,0.0007246724,0.0005915028,0.00072077004,0.00019574749],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046118433,0.0010898643,0.9044959,0.0000919816,0.00017420732,0.00063902105,0.061233886,0.00015150587,0.008501803,0.0012249462,0.0001847291,0.021751042],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020799764,0.00034596428,0.9868129,0.000015405154,0.00003891812,0.00049738004,0.009659502,0.00029917876,0.00090140285,0.0004259225,0.00096514495,0.000017541439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061343582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059459573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061343582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037386705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025552945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012197316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071292061","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.546","title":"Bidirectional associations in multiplication memory: Conditions of negative and positive transfer.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Factoring; Multiplication (music); Arithmetic; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Flexibility (engineering); Representation (politics); Product (mathematics); Interference (communication); Parallel computing; Mathematics; Statistics; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.05612179686239192,"score_gpt":0.40380750281483346,"score_spread":0.3476857059524415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071292061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852299,0.00023900419,0.002124112,0.00018866891,0.000045549237,0.00011491029,0.000074973344,0.000051822833,0.011931068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789435,0.00006457043,0.00094210333,0.000050426817,0.000029989602,0.0001549892,0.00007165947,0.000013007343,0.0007788974],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979691,0.00054905674,0.00020427664,0.000436981,0.0005506466,0.00028992808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977467,0.014634602,0.002030337,0.0031362767,0.00096310547,0.0017687193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036985308,0.0005221287,0.00058324705,0.00090609165,0.0007882745,0.0012175385,0.0007643918,0.0012470648,0.010876663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027042517,0.00048018346,0.00023975338,0.00044464265,0.0024472822,0.004462343,0.0041710087,0.0012369268,0.0006584803],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06370861,0.010226094,0.08011318,0.0018914691,0.00029566113,0.0016655646,0.01001336,0.0031177544,0.4912639,0.06254852,0.0018866104,0.27326927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008309455,0.020686438,0.42215922,0.00037228296,0.0007211988,0.00700069,0.004829414,0.024513097,0.20058782,0.2983867,0.011948036,0.00048563693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000563247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004715111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010876663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000843485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010165235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036386013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073381953","doi":"10.1037/a0028476","title":"Interpolated task effects on direct and mediated false recognition: Effects of initial recall, recognition, and the ironic effect of guessing.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; False memory; Test (biology); Associative property; Psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Recognition memory; Word recognition; Speech recognition; Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Mathematics; Linguistics; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.029946761426764234,"score_gpt":0.34012571365945576,"score_spread":0.31017895223269154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073381953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99489236,0.00032740846,0.0027430009,0.000049142727,0.000030315714,0.000070735034,0.00009323998,0.000060085196,0.0017336572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950354,0.00011880211,0.0033063402,0.000090063586,0.000019159905,0.00009562811,0.00013596291,0.0000441215,0.001154549],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977278,0.00061969255,0.00027149386,0.0005519926,0.00069270754,0.00013626997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9466941,0.040250592,0.006424421,0.0042013773,0.0008596682,0.0015699469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035170922,0.00091665995,0.00071430503,0.00044406214,0.00017930985,0.0009125711,0.0010774189,0.0010997044,0.0051052067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044019993,0.00058910437,0.00036744328,0.00017425715,0.0009862196,0.0016840028,0.0013130171,0.001468763,0.00052901916],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.107218795,0.008093077,0.052309148,0.001391874,0.0006292429,0.0011502116,0.0031239106,0.002192699,0.70162493,0.0025810264,0.0005512515,0.11913381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041510947,0.03425337,0.58199877,0.00016541441,0.00087397476,0.0026764139,0.00043015013,0.012043481,0.34988344,0.011057595,0.0021824723,0.00028381424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005446092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005131598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051052067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003715586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028103957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018600404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073857782","doi":"10.1037/a0029671","title":"Listeners remember music they like.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Recognition memory; Set (abstract data type); Similarity (geometry); Association (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Test (biology); Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.08332092895494417,"score_gpt":0.3569616064506762,"score_spread":0.27364067749573207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073857782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96579295,0.0034228722,0.007898762,0.0005423867,0.00019209684,0.000028378308,0.00021436205,0.00013104764,0.02177722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887531,0.0014174987,0.0036491295,0.00033978384,0.00014291778,0.000013837376,0.00020276982,0.00002248634,0.0054583554],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998832,0.000015516225,0.000008418233,0.000030032983,0.00004697073,0.000015869255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994936,0.00010323779,0.00018112888,0.000051567993,0.000109019726,0.00006143687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002539665,0.00024686847,0.00018031558,0.0001739046,0.00017443736,0.00071834907,0.00011492142,0.00042724758,0.0030796854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017622196,0.00009388322,0.0001599316,0.00011663706,0.00022656762,0.00079325645,0.00028663673,0.00033184286,0.000856457],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019680874,0.00019629934,0.110664345,0.0007735771,0.00034073033,0.0007357369,0.004226572,0.0003560486,0.51558906,0.00237516,0.003321675,0.35945272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007487198,0.0025846087,0.87964123,0.00014194852,0.00036550136,0.003801015,0.0049605444,0.0012957031,0.077034056,0.007788649,0.022208722,0.00010312645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023511451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043432528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030796854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072278046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057839265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010302544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074444315","doi":"10.1037/a0013590","title":"The role of categories and spatial cuing in global-scale location estimates.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Perception; Spatial ability; Spatial cognition; Variety (cybernetics); Cognitive psychology; Scale (ratio); Space (punctuation); Affect (linguistics); Cognition; Cartography; Geography; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.007218921323335461,"score_gpt":0.2785494909709833,"score_spread":0.27133056964764785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074444315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99063337,0.00010554441,0.0055747414,0.000049690887,0.00001619666,0.000033610482,0.000050304636,0.000024840007,0.003511852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980117,0.000015787702,0.0017372735,0.000013839608,0.0000021960218,0.000021194246,0.000021551241,0.0000080638765,0.00016846496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970387,0.0015857255,0.00016668075,0.00047118083,0.00055346487,0.00018422274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96839327,0.021381043,0.0032008537,0.003644735,0.0027005775,0.00067953067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046565216,0.00026426278,0.00019579376,0.00077526283,0.00031850263,0.0016204001,0.00036197322,0.00047185662,0.0009971405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061460596,0.00025063177,0.00014772968,0.000496144,0.0017231093,0.001280501,0.0014235129,0.0003599337,0.00012557702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021932025,0.00029927774,0.72546554,0.00037324586,0.00027024292,0.00018178791,0.030841729,0.0036648558,0.055293232,0.0059754085,0.00080480904,0.1746367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008948664,0.00063087424,0.96007365,0.00006337763,0.00014675001,0.00023042344,0.0075361854,0.009222081,0.007824866,0.011661907,0.0023893674,0.00013099205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006601141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008095706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006601141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003601321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003900433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024626315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074522396","doi":"10.1037/a0038686","title":"Deontic introduction: A theory of inference from is to ought.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Leverhulme Trust; Experimental Psychology Society; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Deontic logic; Defeasible estate; Inference; Action (physics); Outcome (game theory); Epistemology; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Philosophy; Mathematical economics; Economics","score_opus":0.08316009600504377,"score_gpt":0.4060633831892959,"score_spread":0.32290328718425215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074522396","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035132274,0.004104079,0.69601744,0.020912675,0.0009291092,0.00023976454,0.0006237973,0.00045002482,0.24159086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85102,0.0019161337,0.13072462,0.0038321156,0.0008197574,0.00038667783,0.00051268516,0.00014681366,0.010641239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591345,0.0021318595,0.00021712578,0.0008053162,0.0007527703,0.0001794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908274,0.0064480077,0.000846106,0.0009024807,0.0006832497,0.00029277918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007809199,0.0007408907,0.00060950563,0.0017930826,0.0024784175,0.0039899675,0.0019212114,0.003144348,0.007837892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014075852,0.00082306686,0.001973422,0.0011366593,0.011559675,0.011172045,0.002344255,0.004904398,0.0009032277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000311785,0.000020763577,0.00027725086,0.000094971736,0.000018678782,0.00006601842,0.0016600417,0.000728142,0.0003469586,0.9880107,0.001199316,0.0075460253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021603382,0.00001833354,0.00044574536,0.0000554335,0.000022138693,0.000079161735,0.00016253811,0.0036948286,0.000193543,0.98574406,0.009549494,0.000013117317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042798845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033958117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007837892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034203853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019462734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041299462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074912606","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1174","title":"Remembering after a perception of discrepancy: Out with the old, in with the two.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perception; Illusion; Psychology; Feeling; Cognitive psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Recognition memory; Test (biology); Social psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.02204860711900687,"score_gpt":0.3131033607142986,"score_spread":0.29105475359529176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074912606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9963921,0.00035400837,0.001321273,0.00025626886,0.00010402439,0.000008482385,0.00002701291,0.00002336745,0.001513476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981833,0.00007137354,0.0005287617,0.000106535066,0.000020607691,0.0000025430518,0.000034351375,0.0000070081583,0.0010455928],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996542,0.00006276938,0.00003500846,0.000071106806,0.00014552649,0.000031379164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965843,0.0010492856,0.00079539255,0.0006537136,0.00046947412,0.000447797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001127122,0.0002778905,0.000244295,0.00024620257,0.00025121003,0.0010653741,0.00025176053,0.0006345296,0.0016500753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071678087,0.00016092161,0.00018798499,0.0001152956,0.0005311002,0.001699617,0.00062627654,0.001038084,0.00027515553],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013643308,0.0009383377,0.24923243,0.00040975743,0.00029097777,0.0076352954,0.024527188,0.0004383425,0.56020164,0.005992635,0.002937016,0.13375315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026638265,0.015100466,0.69754535,0.00018621811,0.00045229797,0.01882053,0.018045021,0.0041226544,0.20841877,0.014366193,0.022408286,0.0002677718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034176733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041194234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016500753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016966375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015837414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0059608817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075654672","doi":"10.1037/a0034886","title":"The effects of spatial contextual familiarity on remembered scenes, episodic memories, and imagined future events.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Psychology; Episodic memory; Cognitive psychology; Spatial contextual awareness; Landmark; Context (archaeology); Autobiographical memory; Cognition; Recall; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; History","score_opus":0.016281449683559938,"score_gpt":0.29795258990040424,"score_spread":0.2816711402168443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075654672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9951119,0.0009166437,0.002044969,0.000039875576,0.000014545699,0.000013424927,0.000042032494,0.000012048289,0.0018046024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818027,0.00030108093,0.0013167097,0.000015059088,0.0000091425645,0.000008158193,0.00003858466,0.000005698988,0.00012528893],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932206,0.0002695628,0.00006354499,0.00013370084,0.0001693244,0.000041923002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932632,0.004078066,0.0013723249,0.00060614746,0.00031574746,0.0003644824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086357206,0.0002251938,0.00022024612,0.00025691773,0.00016403773,0.00045897812,0.0002055473,0.00021853545,0.0013792029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010763365,0.00019383058,0.0002317812,0.00014108286,0.00060174614,0.00078388833,0.00060581753,0.0003718853,0.000066525994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061806585,0.00048113172,0.13552809,0.001166642,0.0006939459,0.0011045634,0.0055238334,0.0010611527,0.72929984,0.0019786842,0.00028635864,0.116695076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060554074,0.0033634254,0.9219739,0.00006768224,0.0003640528,0.0021515712,0.0012562744,0.0010494689,0.0664415,0.001720319,0.0014855642,0.00006577333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00059116044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013243695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013792029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019746818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014778686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0046138763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2080482804","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1279","title":"When Words Collide: Facilitation and Interference in the Report of Repeated Words From Rapidly Presented Lists.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Facilitation; Word (group theory); Dissociation (chemistry); Psychology; Repetition priming; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Word recognition; Speech recognition; Computer science; Linguistics; Communication; Lexical decision task; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03739093007628701,"score_gpt":0.35742410339064434,"score_spread":0.3200331733143573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2080482804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98520505,0.0006023663,0.0053966804,0.00016865294,0.00004905357,0.000054781383,0.00008241277,0.00014899875,0.008292021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939516,0.00023179325,0.004539725,0.00014127207,0.00004356421,0.00006171538,0.00009752641,0.000082900646,0.0008498231],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853027,0.00051337486,0.0001203945,0.00022401288,0.0005036955,0.00010817338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96463615,0.026431682,0.004613824,0.0025334116,0.0009816474,0.00080326403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017973079,0.00043077715,0.00032602833,0.0005263755,0.00032167538,0.00066439004,0.00042659338,0.00052681693,0.0015781845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02840448,0.00042951564,0.00014626828,0.0002541128,0.0010865342,0.00082768075,0.0011266936,0.0006732807,0.00047672098],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058572753,0.00055066735,0.041796044,0.00043588053,0.000088674584,0.002094982,0.008523216,0.0002460856,0.8464328,0.0020601274,0.00078221405,0.09113196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003312327,0.0042373305,0.6709296,0.00012857403,0.0002585137,0.0076246723,0.0016658667,0.0040100375,0.29811135,0.008346688,0.0042328956,0.00012331505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000891404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009766439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017973079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002211381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000339725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009505153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081186977","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1289","title":"Attention constraints of semantic activation during visual word recognition.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"U.S. Public Health Service","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Semantic memory; Psychology; Word recognition; Response priming; Cognitive psychology; Consonant; Stimulus onset asynchrony; Stimulus (psychology); Cognition; Natural language processing; Computer science; Speech recognition; Vowel; Linguistics; Neuroscience; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.11155319377603967,"score_gpt":0.39787191743120537,"score_spread":0.2863187236551657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081186977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97499293,0.0006029745,0.012078374,0.00021525755,0.00008402085,0.000043441578,0.00008386715,0.00010519227,0.011793925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581426,0.00018334645,0.0026887467,0.0000872701,0.000024637833,0.000031798274,0.00006240673,0.000027978613,0.0010795902],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998104,0.000031170734,0.0000122481715,0.000046019235,0.000060458962,0.000039778726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983101,0.0010438906,0.00022032352,0.00013854688,0.0001601369,0.00012705753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000384842,0.00017698799,0.00021001621,0.00017505218,0.00017312665,0.00057729665,0.0002746701,0.00038757938,0.0025809053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003089065,0.00024000037,0.00016916379,0.00010326378,0.00046723115,0.0009100574,0.00054606743,0.00057008094,0.00033494722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046250992,0.000036372716,0.00077923085,0.0000959355,0.0000069223324,0.000114323055,0.00018437834,0.000078725796,0.9842407,0.0021921387,0.00012131097,0.01168736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027212422,0.001421647,0.2406524,0.00008883811,0.000120133554,0.0016508552,0.00053090753,0.009031977,0.70521057,0.03573812,0.005224361,0.000058051082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048805852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008724158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0025809053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035974506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029490932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008634031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082332677","doi":"10.1037/a0028466","title":"Reassessing the basis of the production effect in memory.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Production (economics); Social psychology","score_opus":0.04275982191309756,"score_gpt":0.3533253188497292,"score_spread":0.3105654969366316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082332677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91675,0.0037888421,0.046110578,0.0074800933,0.0009636227,0.00012883492,0.00027547314,0.00030454318,0.024197923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910439,0.00033859335,0.0061023748,0.00086482835,0.0002019101,0.00003769701,0.000101511076,0.00006776434,0.0012413841],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862075,0.00029076115,0.0001254308,0.00036489026,0.00053211197,0.00006604483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686377,0.019402824,0.001853827,0.0078073977,0.001804799,0.00049339584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006146344,0.00060317595,0.00050861225,0.0005610508,0.00028813822,0.000895922,0.0014555438,0.0010040293,0.0038126137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02146734,0.00020026535,0.00043442444,0.00022520646,0.0032709267,0.0035018178,0.0016682628,0.0030178085,0.00039363807],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058403835,0.0012963891,0.05418264,0.0011739213,0.00064820074,0.0021049576,0.0039706025,0.0009854421,0.66164136,0.0593215,0.0024033778,0.20643128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004199089,0.005358732,0.4526043,0.0001816144,0.00091495167,0.005935817,0.0013430781,0.0076146303,0.34658575,0.16555962,0.013268369,0.00021319212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035641124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031502516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006146344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003297482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034137312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032505333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082844406","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000099","title":"Truthiness and falsiness of trivia claims depend on judgmental contexts.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"Marsden Fund; Royal Society Te Apārangi; New Zealand Government","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1359826902403465,"score_gpt":0.3518541782976512,"score_spread":0.2158714880573047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082844406","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9695426,0.0004281781,0.0042243004,0.00020141873,0.000097970515,0.0001466538,0.00014399429,0.000053082178,0.025161752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960532,0.000116888776,0.002690359,0.000119619406,0.00003063538,0.00006285492,0.00013137472,0.000029971461,0.00076500844],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572575,0.0013816379,0.00048231258,0.0010111026,0.0011946023,0.0002046577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9569444,0.029288387,0.0073548076,0.0032343366,0.001934378,0.0012436474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004882358,0.00051530474,0.00039717127,0.00082330493,0.00062937726,0.002333509,0.00042291204,0.001045332,0.00847819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057843164,0.00048786175,0.0004916565,0.000279682,0.001349063,0.0031824685,0.0018007245,0.0013615555,0.00053425704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013472304,0.002869436,0.30822396,0.0030772698,0.0011895382,0.0011164173,0.021739626,0.0013529435,0.47551414,0.015338909,0.0024934122,0.15361193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025706456,0.00228959,0.927278,0.00026005355,0.0004181181,0.0012980142,0.0035628476,0.003995358,0.041224584,0.01537834,0.0038521455,0.00018596607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040160256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088165153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00847819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040668144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022548277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028362393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082909354","doi":"10.1037/a0015829","title":"Operation-specific effects of numerical surface form on arithmetic strategy.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Operand; Arithmetic; Multiplication (music); Subtraction; Word (group theory); Computer science; Division (mathematics); Numeral system; Key (lock); Mathematics","score_opus":0.03226061449393853,"score_gpt":0.34923765272013896,"score_spread":0.31697703822620044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082909354","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981184,0.000071032104,0.00019964429,0.000024020284,0.0000038450708,0.00000988597,0.000059184502,0.000010470733,0.0015036121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978946,0.00005478183,0.00062392437,0.00003128864,0.0000039981605,0.000018740851,0.00011715066,0.000016061682,0.0012393924],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939346,0.0001583338,0.000068713234,0.00015221367,0.00017113451,0.000056208955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797324,0.015259401,0.002396522,0.0012696845,0.0005231134,0.000818919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079547404,0.00038757938,0.00026022887,0.00040577742,0.00009351662,0.0006904924,0.00029748358,0.0003807868,0.0057619778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013312954,0.00021147403,0.00021535622,0.00026704377,0.0005176298,0.0005376439,0.00072016066,0.00044879128,0.00033314538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018694889,0.0056586596,0.33718136,0.00063087826,0.0005716908,0.0012398317,0.0030997202,0.002717863,0.4889486,0.0030380518,0.00084101007,0.13737744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013073633,0.0021772087,0.9785241,0.000011850448,0.0001281436,0.0004578842,0.00014099144,0.0012975165,0.0155267455,0.0010488692,0.0005357306,0.000020130185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005337407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007980772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057619778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018679324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000175557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019275725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083148845","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.32.4.643","title":"Distinctive features hold a privileged status in the computation of word meaning: Implications for theories of semantic memory.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":151,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health; National Institute of Mental Health; Shared Hierarchical Academic Research Computing Network","keywords":"Connectionism; Meaning (existential); Word (group theory); Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Computation; Semantic feature; Semantic memory; Mechanism (biology); Semantics (computer science); Artificial intelligence; Semantic network; Vocabulary; Natural language processing; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Psychology; Artificial neural network; Cognition; Epistemology; Algorithm; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0218965359907486,"score_gpt":0.34129599114594594,"score_spread":0.31939945515519735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083148845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882591,0.00018071996,0.008630857,0.00023503638,0.000017004104,0.000010913015,0.000049267426,0.000044976216,0.0025723055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974336,0.000055690994,0.0021850567,0.000047967133,0.0000049114356,0.000014426869,0.000031652195,0.000008711753,0.00021807733],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993999,0.0001457297,0.00005370645,0.00014124675,0.00018597707,0.00007335861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790421,0.01431834,0.0020722572,0.0034546368,0.00049236434,0.00062036974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018980697,0.000185694,0.00029251486,0.00037378655,0.00033834646,0.0008347112,0.00049449125,0.0009577003,0.002607056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017483654,0.0002639586,0.00014938417,0.00025290187,0.0026683742,0.0030393924,0.0012525439,0.0008071747,0.00020229332],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036556455,0.00081539195,0.079758964,0.00053368433,0.00013548546,0.000828618,0.0050974567,0.0014944213,0.6379711,0.07671834,0.00081753946,0.19217342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037897055,0.0033689754,0.36446565,0.00012564809,0.00020507349,0.0034993598,0.0024792629,0.012596471,0.3422952,0.2634875,0.0069222376,0.00017558866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034346944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035955833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002607056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026745273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026861855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010038078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085523497","doi":"10.1037/a0021323","title":"Remembering makes evidence compelling: Retrieval from memory can give rise to the illusion of truth.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Illusion; Repetition (rhetorical device); Fluency; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.063843695698591,"score_gpt":0.35150668582850747,"score_spread":0.2876629901299165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085523497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95952827,0.006521077,0.01186218,0.003840161,0.00050836185,0.00006135886,0.00007678816,0.000117726064,0.017484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913679,0.0014167303,0.005352206,0.0005599492,0.0001391865,0.000022169019,0.000051046714,0.000020567697,0.001070255],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989188,0.00036890953,0.000071925526,0.00014670554,0.0004391563,0.000054539672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777379,0.016990226,0.002721296,0.0014997984,0.00047937853,0.000571323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022559296,0.0003264977,0.00032714393,0.00056941406,0.0003410293,0.0011556899,0.00044373973,0.0013795267,0.0028237915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024930742,0.00025430112,0.00029977376,0.00023755485,0.0018801123,0.0025215922,0.0013393136,0.0016084985,0.00024783067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053032506,0.0009853622,0.04136292,0.0017797407,0.00047837387,0.0030681298,0.00533854,0.0006057134,0.6386019,0.049097523,0.0027793257,0.2505993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006935204,0.012554464,0.33014786,0.0010148302,0.0014338065,0.018425038,0.003607734,0.007600538,0.38375306,0.20847459,0.032010123,0.00028440545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020810997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031858854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028237915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028013272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024145069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0119306445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086166067","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.26.3.547","title":"The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":261,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Feeling; Fluency; Attribution; Cognitive psychology; Perception; Processing fluency; Social psychology; Stimulus (psychology)","score_opus":0.04008364398310759,"score_gpt":0.3156881697549435,"score_spread":0.2756045257718359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086166067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86760205,0.008230247,0.044010926,0.016371414,0.000663307,0.00008723309,0.00015414623,0.00012925135,0.062751524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99757785,0.000347838,0.00095935835,0.00044591635,0.0000797236,0.000014720433,0.000021076918,0.000007326206,0.00054626813],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983797,0.0007627889,0.0000936902,0.00024642967,0.000417409,0.00009995323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836964,0.009958704,0.0035018951,0.0010773526,0.00086090766,0.00090467685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00355503,0.00030380354,0.0002787832,0.00080567197,0.00043933545,0.0023929954,0.00042317377,0.0017226344,0.0029686324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025187176,0.00025847892,0.0003187298,0.00036007632,0.0036936232,0.0028714808,0.0018820076,0.0016710486,0.0003721029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036248958,0.0010996712,0.2765035,0.0011430787,0.0008802627,0.00707957,0.09614757,0.0019766663,0.039215922,0.21288085,0.00952543,0.34992257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007809695,0.0019174883,0.5197894,0.00056993443,0.00044061954,0.019356268,0.042979572,0.01147092,0.0106154885,0.36627665,0.025343094,0.0004595665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002282171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013867077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00355503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048380363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023085225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018801033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086276752","doi":"10.1037/a0028874","title":"Young children's understanding of “more” and discrimination of number and surface area.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Syntax; Representation (politics); Linguistics; Character (mathematics); Cognition; Dimension (graph theory); Semantics (computer science); Similarity (geometry); Psychology; Numerical cognition; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Mathematics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.061527540254623404,"score_gpt":0.3606962361064105,"score_spread":0.29916869585178707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086276752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9692303,0.0014310413,0.0018512289,0.00065520534,0.00003371185,0.000028289985,0.00032319318,0.00010853413,0.026338536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99355316,0.00094156334,0.0016810325,0.00025292506,0.0000052569526,0.00003628764,0.00024218064,0.000024473635,0.003263131],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946815,0.00007176373,0.000041214924,0.00013741192,0.00019284365,0.00008858833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973711,0.0009870555,0.00094846374,0.00015606766,0.00035355097,0.00018373941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013853665,0.00043983178,0.0002923696,0.00093569775,0.00037826216,0.0025878844,0.00035438346,0.0011274805,0.0039137937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005733837,0.0004564251,0.0005901204,0.00034835428,0.0016517878,0.004251421,0.0011044292,0.0012492434,0.0007468627],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027921385,0.00029379976,0.3563305,0.0011516062,0.00010104328,0.0048407507,0.42834157,0.0008944392,0.05729975,0.03069972,0.0072716074,0.112495966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027191361,0.00037848423,0.86384326,0.00058883673,0.00013648985,0.004487598,0.06572445,0.0011359319,0.010506455,0.016565245,0.036461465,0.00014460746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011189042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01317231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011189042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006026587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071394775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02224785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086362182","doi":"10.1037/a0014875","title":"Bilingual lexical access in context: Evidence from eye movements during reading.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":371,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Linguistics; Comprehension; Lexical access; Reading comprehension; Sentence; Eye movement; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Facilitation; Context (archaeology); Fixation (population genetics); Eye tracking; Cognitive psychology; Reading (process); Cognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06299769029691098,"score_gpt":0.40268475075984433,"score_spread":0.33968706046293334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086362182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99574715,0.00077900983,0.0006739283,0.00006201281,0.000010046746,0.000013441699,0.00024747002,0.00003301284,0.0024340008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974196,0.0005449039,0.00097036903,0.000075000644,0.000014334342,0.000029040208,0.00028758417,0.000014987159,0.00064411847],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999075,0.000017035578,0.000005239604,0.000030201338,0.000024298162,0.000015746622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993975,0.00020271997,0.00022730531,0.00004607109,0.00007744309,0.000048922273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017102943,0.00018365985,0.00016833063,0.0004111963,0.00017446512,0.00030191545,0.000114095725,0.00031488948,0.0011814743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016446563,0.00020913777,0.00009280742,0.0002846623,0.00027750529,0.00037400148,0.00034466042,0.00033091469,0.00024306106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007598371,0.0000710553,0.03678246,0.00018308013,0.000043431548,0.00043576697,0.0013733656,0.0000449365,0.9318781,0.00016146046,0.00039995185,0.02786654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004222049,0.00018870606,0.98091954,0.000019425064,0.000029731758,0.0007524951,0.00028875316,0.00017300135,0.016435027,0.00026328283,0.0008761979,0.000011719344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00172184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049504912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00172184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015633942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012476706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0039524436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087397634","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.29.5.826","title":"Adult age differences in episodic memory: Further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":392,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Content-addressable memory; Associative property; Episodic memory; Psychology; Encoding (memory); Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Neuroscience; Cognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08468708622743149,"score_gpt":0.34756950472559217,"score_spread":0.2628824184981607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087397634","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99700564,0.00047964277,0.00036435344,0.00008446447,0.000016877273,0.00001063863,0.00020668739,0.000006988937,0.0018246196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902,0.00016338915,0.0002368608,0.000047877664,0.000016956525,0.000006003884,0.00010132657,0.0000017848884,0.00040587972],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99985766,0.000019700266,0.000023004312,0.000047494384,0.00003553154,0.000016542084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982699,0.00043831937,0.00068770006,0.00020489261,0.00016613386,0.00023300087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075940456,0.00026794913,0.00024491557,0.00063606026,0.00014376099,0.00030714716,0.00020575988,0.0003467529,0.003048219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020751196,0.00007907807,0.00012773591,0.0002464151,0.00031893895,0.0006765653,0.00036601425,0.0003370516,0.00040759426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022765214,0.001095101,0.870802,0.0002333796,0.00015715639,0.0018135823,0.0041914107,0.00013173178,0.070209764,0.001691255,0.00064979494,0.046748236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028334698,0.001442933,0.99188,0.000011041958,0.00005343121,0.0016165671,0.00037387965,0.00011130743,0.002721623,0.0008340204,0.0009195141,0.0000073493316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004929425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005237697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003048219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007617036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009326236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010197282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088425640","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.1030","title":"The Influence of Cue Type on Backward Inhibition.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Campion College; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Set (abstract data type); Response inhibition; Lateral inhibition; Psychology; Negative priming; Selection (genetic algorithm); Communication; Cognitive psychology; Sensory cue; Spatial ability; Computer science; Neuroscience; Selective attention; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08768249800471091,"score_gpt":0.39758142952990455,"score_spread":0.30989893152519365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088425640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857087,0.000730486,0.0051922686,0.00010831591,0.00019650659,0.00008647531,0.0002991214,0.00009262931,0.0075854897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99434537,0.00030801247,0.0029282789,0.00016544414,0.00003882661,0.0000912304,0.00021371343,0.00020072097,0.001708384],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985306,0.0004319054,0.00018716858,0.0002556679,0.0004772603,0.000117406016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856575,0.0100983055,0.0016414108,0.0011351871,0.0008170627,0.00065040047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019336141,0.0006556579,0.00072028046,0.0005509153,0.00028711976,0.001533549,0.0007588125,0.0005371353,0.0032172578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022669468,0.00037240065,0.00034058353,0.00028834186,0.00058310945,0.00095632486,0.0008987363,0.0007474291,0.0004498593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00899281,0.0005943652,0.026568074,0.00057107344,0.00016404275,0.00037758303,0.00064489467,0.0005627988,0.92747396,0.001524125,0.00032349085,0.03220265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081720226,0.0048565804,0.5307173,0.00028356415,0.0012964103,0.002573761,0.0009887668,0.013709966,0.4256917,0.013911629,0.004850537,0.0003026337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015432694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015585626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032172578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048610615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005297056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010762751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089473142","doi":"10.1037/a0019938","title":"Spinning in the scanner: Neural correlates of virtual reorientation.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Brescia University College; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Ontario Innovation Trust","keywords":"Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Psychology; Prefrontal cortex; Gray (unit); Inferior frontal gyrus; Cognition; Neural correlates of consciousness; Temporal lobe; Cognitive psychology; Brain mapping; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.011725259381529728,"score_gpt":0.292824084152226,"score_spread":0.28109882477069625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089473142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950309,0.0004387596,0.0019840521,0.00011805176,0.000020137808,0.000016940761,0.000112682734,0.000034393113,0.002244053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976278,0.00027751733,0.0012949738,0.00009409035,0.000014770825,0.000014920416,0.00012463081,0.0000104906185,0.0005409089],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99994946,0.0000120859795,0.0000024747824,0.000015324367,0.000014122182,0.0000065750573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961925,0.00010801564,0.00014906231,0.00003184273,0.000046241115,0.000045583685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014832009,0.0001392461,0.00007944798,0.00021220601,0.000100125384,0.00021795282,0.00017127309,0.00022723632,0.0017593774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015892333,0.00013768955,0.000049414157,0.00012297265,0.00033588463,0.00029553953,0.00023811359,0.00022390748,0.00018914195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015900615,0.00022946761,0.2301357,0.0002531424,0.00016373774,0.0036225508,0.0017702205,0.0005389453,0.6396361,0.0012835712,0.0020282615,0.11874826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025021409,0.0005675356,0.97602934,0.000030519066,0.00005462635,0.0059589967,0.0003691841,0.0010277858,0.0125970375,0.0009845011,0.0023373028,0.000018223454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000563082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015372898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017593774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006966964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010429088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0058857203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092762241","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.1062","title":"Response selection and response execution in task switching: Evidence from a go-signal paradigm.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Response time; Response inhibition; Task (project management); Go/no go; Selection (genetic algorithm); Direct response; Stimulus (psychology); Task switching; Repetition (rhetorical device); Psychology; Stimulus–response model; Simon effect; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.11218760388938102,"score_gpt":0.4107561880387613,"score_spread":0.29856858414938026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092762241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993454,0.00021621646,0.0038596503,0.000088034605,0.00001891171,0.00005919039,0.00006961706,0.000045872064,0.0021885457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99137324,0.00020478977,0.006582179,0.00020928765,0.000027572261,0.00020552837,0.0002750158,0.000095912306,0.0010264734],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987257,0.000421513,0.00010006055,0.00019510284,0.00042510708,0.00013252506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908885,0.0051516052,0.0020233272,0.000956295,0.00029904777,0.0006811773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016245942,0.0006924463,0.000601887,0.00051108736,0.00019779551,0.0005704519,0.000614534,0.00060775725,0.002536157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008837685,0.00043788654,0.0002943509,0.00028294142,0.0005521294,0.0007099146,0.0008296972,0.0011194128,0.0002794453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012817224,0.002090588,0.010557789,0.00044962595,0.00019204586,0.00022666632,0.0002644562,0.000572548,0.94039476,0.00091434777,0.00020657442,0.031313382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018299052,0.012968515,0.6323782,0.0001137343,0.00048364536,0.002155964,0.00023706864,0.020688344,0.31776664,0.007904063,0.0032754827,0.00019839549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007636146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010967535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002536157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000422723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054430304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008591831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093389803","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.9","title":"The Influence of Grammatical, Local, and Organizational Redundancy on Implicit Learning: An Analysis Using Information Theory.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Implicit learning; Recall; Grammar; Computer science; Natural language processing; Information structure; Markov chain; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Set (abstract data type); Linguistics; Psychology; Machine learning; Cognition","score_opus":0.0129131413948443,"score_gpt":0.3243061033125334,"score_spread":0.3113929619176891,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093389803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8772297,0.0028147611,0.10444273,0.0023882464,0.000048970855,0.00016377993,0.00023779621,0.00014175105,0.012532343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923962,0.00037776338,0.0064851637,0.000085704625,0.00004755904,0.000060220224,0.00006472879,0.000037744736,0.00044491162],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957386,0.002624156,0.00017406578,0.00031276818,0.0008474858,0.0003029193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6559602,0.32851598,0.005320036,0.0052699363,0.003497273,0.0014365363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013739129,0.00047881273,0.00094148866,0.0019836787,0.00061342976,0.001743182,0.0010100718,0.0011040132,0.0030438777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11688312,0.00044985051,0.0014407185,0.0014151906,0.003241642,0.0035602772,0.0015491423,0.0019069985,0.00022953887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061171777,0.0019920391,0.25137717,0.0011804107,0.0029613536,0.0022965795,0.004900271,0.10824072,0.030875212,0.25841483,0.0050144996,0.3266298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037221797,0.0014279423,0.18846413,0.00011822166,0.002113378,0.0008424791,0.0005266973,0.5156071,0.014366975,0.27329752,0.0026762532,0.00018716608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017718788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014359192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013739129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012358568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084172946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07266033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097341932","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.539","title":"Representation of lexical form.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders","keywords":"Repetition priming; Repetition (rhetorical device); Priming (agriculture); Prime (order theory); Representation (politics); Linguistics; Mathematics; Psychology; Lexical decision task; Combinatorics; Cognition; Philosophy; Biology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.06801281939492258,"score_gpt":0.4294848806511311,"score_spread":0.3614720612562085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097341932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6197182,0.00209148,0.23013023,0.0011848587,0.00045947725,0.00015458703,0.0009668248,0.0011555828,0.14413878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97600687,0.00029662988,0.016840186,0.00008150657,0.000029643687,0.00002066083,0.00032092247,0.00006644727,0.006337063],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975985,0.000047474383,0.000020899499,0.000074532145,0.000077098375,0.000020116648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928004,0.00018888817,0.00008323275,0.00022370546,0.00017892136,0.000045154786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030500066,0.0001789063,0.00020309091,0.00036356304,0.00020904567,0.0017782536,0.00022437634,0.0003087914,0.005827994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024971575,0.000100625104,0.00017433027,0.00026366182,0.00059601374,0.0015168894,0.0005629247,0.00035564674,0.001253449],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044070228,0.000068706264,0.010763221,0.00057436957,0.000048946185,0.0008367264,0.00410939,0.001479582,0.31702784,0.19501017,0.0030003497,0.46664006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016756207,0.0013461993,0.07978783,0.00031000405,0.0001816716,0.00823369,0.0030653635,0.039811786,0.12958105,0.5406075,0.19674112,0.00016626444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027889753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002802489,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005827994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019204045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002428498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01949656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2100313834","doi":"10.1037/a0013012","title":"Making sense of word senses: The comprehension of polysemy depends on sense overlap.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Faculty of Medicine, McGill University","keywords":"Polysemy; Metonymy; Psychology; Comprehension; Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Dominance (genetics); Metaphor; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06382603266129483,"score_gpt":0.3660253253070006,"score_spread":0.3021992926457058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2100313834","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870695,0.0005533054,0.0069088647,0.00025697198,0.00001862454,0.00002122754,0.00007666357,0.000040206338,0.005054737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696654,0.0002804856,0.0022316203,0.00006872559,0.000010788513,0.000021532222,0.00008044918,0.000025182173,0.00031469055],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990125,0.00037773442,0.00005841665,0.00016825285,0.0003357801,0.000047236827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98245066,0.0118672345,0.0034590291,0.00093159516,0.0007665498,0.00052486453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021831943,0.0005161168,0.00030179805,0.00071455864,0.00030928108,0.0014202049,0.00029283966,0.00046252774,0.0016773496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022472776,0.00042054316,0.00023987709,0.0005249688,0.0014912325,0.0037730734,0.0016628711,0.0010052903,0.00018572323],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026527767,0.000498178,0.17042786,0.0019246222,0.0004770856,0.0010855243,0.14326012,0.00078784913,0.48663616,0.017796628,0.002238476,0.17221478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008799452,0.0016265992,0.846991,0.00022271226,0.00036423776,0.0031004206,0.033985462,0.008727483,0.03417559,0.06503421,0.005459137,0.0002252825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004943042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005778606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0021831943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002058843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022224402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011546016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2101609748","doi":"10.1037/a0025054","title":"Broken expectations: Violation of expectancies, not novelty, captures auditory attention.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Novelty; Recall; Psychology; Expectancy theory; Cognitive psychology; Distraction; Session (web analytics); Task (project management); Predictability; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07611169134358206,"score_gpt":0.3316662462288911,"score_spread":0.2555545548853091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2101609748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99469274,0.00015527109,0.004193585,0.000035931702,0.000013709807,0.000015126939,0.000025941523,0.000025658816,0.00084198156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847263,0.000038079495,0.0011218352,0.00003971202,0.000007185505,0.000012478079,0.000061316954,0.0000075192,0.00023924028],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946696,0.000072817464,0.00004795585,0.0001139204,0.00022839697,0.000069988746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981577,0.0006477894,0.0005324753,0.0004102091,0.00008856445,0.00016335696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008605935,0.00026596416,0.00023524166,0.00016599114,0.00011710456,0.00049622863,0.00051263475,0.00038194202,0.0008243592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058416026,0.00022138662,0.00020053746,0.000086481334,0.00043132962,0.0005408272,0.0007254757,0.0006229761,0.000086910324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001445999,0.0001849751,0.016940417,0.000113059315,0.0000734926,0.0002203711,0.00029609128,0.00040916866,0.9551016,0.00084880134,0.00009590252,0.024270067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001333894,0.0051985225,0.5372655,0.000048079983,0.00016566734,0.0021845193,0.00027510963,0.0134507185,0.43464044,0.0053534512,0.0012181703,0.000066526205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050453213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007933873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008605935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033115834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002515108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0045512915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103461768","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.572","title":"Phonological effects in visual word recognition: Investigating the impact of feedback activation.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Homophone; Phonology; Psychology; Word recognition; Phonetics; Cognitive psychology; Lexical decision task; Orthography; Linguistics; Reading (process); Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.05153161646448778,"score_gpt":0.3699934405593887,"score_spread":0.3184618240949009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103461768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964772,0.00022240865,0.0017719868,0.00005131112,0.000024597917,0.000024312549,0.00006481689,0.00004348431,0.0013198437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99748564,0.00011648437,0.0014568255,0.000057528654,0.000015089969,0.00003457562,0.00006371881,0.00003846566,0.0007316543],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994809,0.00015905383,0.000035150446,0.00011446367,0.0001621516,0.00004831463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931971,0.005272855,0.0005867817,0.00023879467,0.00033356994,0.00037091243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074693066,0.00034730937,0.000288514,0.00030231784,0.00012601496,0.0004822743,0.00028911015,0.0004967265,0.0027337759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011287617,0.00028122746,0.00016293484,0.0001249099,0.00048722624,0.0006569817,0.00064216997,0.0004863152,0.00030554374],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00244743,0.00026600918,0.009297152,0.00028733772,0.0000160278,0.00039445463,0.0005031894,0.00025529356,0.94641775,0.00035219372,0.0001493976,0.039613664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005567296,0.0059344578,0.43121988,0.00008059974,0.00018561707,0.0021413348,0.0005585924,0.010205722,0.544393,0.0033709928,0.0012920856,0.00006094545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00088419183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007869637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027337759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024238508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025348025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009145379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106740241","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000114","title":"Why segmentation matters: Experience-driven segmentation errors impair “morpheme” learning.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Morpheme; Phonotactics; Linguistics; Language acquisition; Variation (astronomy); Natural language processing; Text segmentation; Constructed language; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Psychology; Component (thermodynamics); Segmentation; Phonology","score_opus":0.040531880305430486,"score_gpt":0.3605902235864723,"score_spread":0.3200583432810418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106740241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99763656,0.00006912627,0.0011378515,0.0001190451,0.000014292708,0.0000073708525,0.000040800292,0.000031606745,0.00094330224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982192,0.00006297075,0.00082613836,0.00007678269,0.0000036090107,0.000008936153,0.00005320941,0.000013138764,0.00073593704],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962354,0.000053564847,0.000042390664,0.00010092406,0.000117934804,0.000061558756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975321,0.0009449394,0.00059454824,0.00036286135,0.00015607857,0.00040938766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006840755,0.00029023085,0.00020737393,0.00021685357,0.00012810917,0.0005066439,0.0004083258,0.0007104218,0.002758118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004048954,0.00021005368,0.00014992215,0.00008321656,0.0012378548,0.0012950684,0.00059737806,0.000913935,0.00036678338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015577914,0.0012321357,0.0716665,0.00027762516,0.000103836646,0.001995961,0.0030598124,0.001118313,0.8483021,0.0040097516,0.0008123701,0.06586364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017100702,0.0069834236,0.41405118,0.00011281251,0.00015904607,0.005599245,0.0024794138,0.0054010004,0.54634005,0.014303928,0.004330162,0.00006875122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007013007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000890407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002758118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014644163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042259088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009226799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107395166","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.26.2.267","title":"Evidence for a generate-recognize model of episodic influences on word-stem completion.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Encoding (memory); Computer science; Dissociation (chemistry); Multinomial distribution; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Word (group theory); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Linguistics; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.2064237822496419,"score_gpt":0.3942853644114197,"score_spread":0.1878615821617778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107395166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81755483,0.00036018027,0.14684646,0.0010079469,0.00008492853,0.00029629402,0.00066346175,0.00043307204,0.03275283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975369,0.00018210615,0.020121632,0.000225062,0.00004119661,0.00020609368,0.00051971443,0.00011171412,0.003223597],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731606,0.0007487606,0.00019987857,0.0005965695,0.0009742404,0.00016439054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608895,0.024530893,0.00515409,0.006573536,0.0017655242,0.0010865176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005541016,0.0004983271,0.000671503,0.0010090662,0.00040506877,0.0016759152,0.0011940383,0.0007823962,0.012687036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034249246,0.00060979236,0.00082812645,0.0005505473,0.0019101495,0.0021207076,0.0021028626,0.0012328323,0.0013714338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074031944,0.003946983,0.31766802,0.0012488787,0.0011828488,0.0017149695,0.005490978,0.024627425,0.092127986,0.3149849,0.0046519777,0.22495186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007049916,0.0019348298,0.4716448,0.00012304545,0.00041155613,0.0046147564,0.0006532087,0.21393022,0.025337199,0.27470225,0.005717573,0.00022554297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032671976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030516568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012687036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008186174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010839636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04244232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107908575","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.333","title":"Global-scale location and distance estimates: Common representations and strategies in absolute and relative judgments.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Latitude; Pairwise comparison; Scale (ratio); Multidimensional scaling; Equator; Scaling; Geography; Geographic coordinate system; Frequency; Geographical distance; Representation (politics); Distance decay; Artifact (error); Mathematics; Statistics; Geodesy; Economic geography; Cartography; Computer science; Sociology; Demography; Geometry; Population; Law; Artificial intelligence; Political science","score_opus":0.01275559115684595,"score_gpt":0.3129479435468294,"score_spread":0.3001923523899835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107908575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8131654,0.0012139173,0.15385638,0.0012761137,0.00011982783,0.00009836392,0.00018582339,0.00020380116,0.02988037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841958,0.000114494156,0.014774414,0.000087921704,0.000013337257,0.000031141248,0.00004956838,0.000019716903,0.0007135568],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778146,0.0009092716,0.00016586835,0.00048685793,0.0005538619,0.00010275769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766178,0.015507836,0.003285789,0.0022923567,0.0018494289,0.0004467605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044351085,0.00040881697,0.00028138194,0.0013734801,0.0003245692,0.0030925616,0.0006592718,0.0010443745,0.0020510578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06410569,0.00033460444,0.00042706152,0.0011119144,0.0020195444,0.005072085,0.0014476872,0.0008575693,0.00026157734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014733775,0.000342337,0.15052426,0.00084516127,0.00057251134,0.0007567968,0.08154416,0.0064080544,0.029307116,0.25179213,0.0031842834,0.47324988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039024622,0.0013453574,0.29789716,0.0006197656,0.00082747365,0.0033158925,0.04095446,0.09185335,0.025972303,0.49972203,0.036593482,0.0005083949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010450399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010125199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0044351085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053053454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003913577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023455381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110154082","doi":"10.1037/a0025764","title":"Neural correlates of creativity in analogical reasoning.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":190,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Dartmouth College; Georgetown University; Dana Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Creativity; Analogy; Analogical reasoning; Cognitive psychology; Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Task (project management); Semantic memory; Cognition; Cognitive science; Semantics (computer science); Brain activity and meditation; Electroencephalography; Neuroscience; Computer science; Linguistics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08054247473109713,"score_gpt":0.39019235449371453,"score_spread":0.3096498797626174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110154082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99352515,0.00019907154,0.0020936823,0.00011320017,0.000007830397,0.00002361373,0.00012344329,0.000010197619,0.003903773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99871075,0.00008493805,0.00076426676,0.000022539829,0.0000102554795,0.000016753054,0.000117606854,0.000003976688,0.0002689215],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99974614,0.000061536775,0.00001920706,0.000058880418,0.0000936468,0.00002061686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962011,0.0018828058,0.0012142509,0.00025303793,0.00023849623,0.00021032852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062717585,0.00014023947,0.00013576537,0.0006515997,0.00015450298,0.00060343585,0.0001868326,0.0003038351,0.001713412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075469553,0.00015061566,0.000113279195,0.00040066472,0.0006510656,0.00046354753,0.00048027502,0.00051180547,0.00013747624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023420395,0.0009082835,0.55478364,0.00043197087,0.00039640634,0.0015170585,0.0028306483,0.0041170823,0.27091008,0.008907541,0.0009051135,0.1519501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003754758,0.00019030756,0.98914623,0.000009379432,0.000030157928,0.0008342793,0.00016041666,0.0014278601,0.0026208474,0.0051930905,0.00033756008,0.000012291603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033952005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006024029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001713412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015005644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010857631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110617459","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000116","title":"Motivation, intentionality, and mind wandering: Implications for assessments of task-unrelated thought.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Mind wandering and attention","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Mind-wandering; Intentionality; Psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Context (archaeology); Intrinsic motivation; Social psychology; Cognition; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1827028831702818,"score_gpt":0.42639757866025085,"score_spread":0.24369469548996905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110617459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846464,0.0017226147,0.008737645,0.00034196328,0.00004010634,0.00021030499,0.00012824802,0.000037410824,0.0041353237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931752,0.00032008512,0.0057770703,0.0000834539,0.000018338491,0.00024460698,0.00009500144,0.0000069336734,0.00027932276],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985746,0.0005731865,0.00021234302,0.00014289875,0.0004422094,0.000054737506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772988,0.011608648,0.007591528,0.001035508,0.0009835205,0.001481933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005683169,0.00047564547,0.0003391367,0.0012053342,0.00043373607,0.0012770126,0.00040184078,0.00062859256,0.0009608736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033769857,0.0002509754,0.00041406418,0.00059399876,0.001067352,0.0012709354,0.001108067,0.0011836924,0.00008941693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011194699,0.0016868906,0.90208507,0.00073173305,0.0004353779,0.00025233693,0.0030474374,0.00051428156,0.018866736,0.002199778,0.0003850507,0.06867576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118951175,0.0005431907,0.99389774,0.000059966875,0.000041656855,0.00023806871,0.00044796529,0.0008610692,0.0013586639,0.0022433032,0.00027379757,0.000022760772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005742066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018223735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005683169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027149532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006219551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030055821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111098121","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.26.4.900","title":"Updating geographical knowledge: Principles of coherence and inertia.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Knowledge base; Geography; Latitude; Economic geography; Set (abstract data type); Regional science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Statistics; Geodesy","score_opus":0.019866707208706286,"score_gpt":0.2985267284811773,"score_spread":0.278660021272471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111098121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6821253,0.0028938057,0.2634534,0.0051161,0.00014004136,0.00022103974,0.00026057716,0.00037537573,0.045414485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824111,0.00025794908,0.016419873,0.00017627461,0.0000313408,0.00006401735,0.000093247,0.000018963021,0.00052719587],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983896,0.00064974336,0.00011761748,0.00035275068,0.00038576763,0.00010465156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772768,0.014205426,0.004018741,0.002633163,0.0012906876,0.00057525997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032952465,0.00031916858,0.00030477453,0.0012223683,0.0004939787,0.0020912446,0.00073190714,0.0010679221,0.0019345961],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046782006,0.00045743145,0.0005036931,0.0008396039,0.0026394513,0.004790413,0.0017923173,0.0010735742,0.00018362989],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009738263,0.0004111695,0.12156818,0.001219347,0.00083317584,0.00041123576,0.019617196,0.025801506,0.0186338,0.33517602,0.005404976,0.4699496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034365745,0.0007299159,0.12515415,0.00024665974,0.00046494542,0.0007595192,0.0027245795,0.07307113,0.0052455473,0.77486706,0.016257212,0.00013560601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021623836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018165306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032952465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007705362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005229052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017427146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114244727","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514","title":"The Stroop effect: Why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":296,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Stroop effect; Contingency; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Social psychology; Linguistics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.06648910599410358,"score_gpt":0.3515228480084273,"score_spread":0.28503374201432374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114244727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5280576,0.06499596,0.09240025,0.14835037,0.012759715,0.000557554,0.002031737,0.0014912126,0.1493556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641239,0.0055342936,0.010984136,0.0109934,0.0019162456,0.00015632388,0.00032653884,0.00023088655,0.005734317],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982834,0.00040560693,0.00014325777,0.00047631716,0.0006203227,0.00007108641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913509,0.004600792,0.0017846856,0.0010188285,0.0009871124,0.00025757292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003020751,0.00043748537,0.0003699762,0.00086419354,0.00040243228,0.0011626586,0.0007964183,0.0014778818,0.004840781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026962932,0.0003703384,0.0002889641,0.0005880477,0.0040360666,0.0031646865,0.0009243865,0.0015833745,0.0006996198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041112755,0.0003859038,0.10336772,0.0026842256,0.0010726837,0.0027744311,0.0067509264,0.00087290024,0.09245315,0.36426476,0.048240352,0.3730217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070192356,0.0007393339,0.28790876,0.0006582885,0.00057319197,0.0073141484,0.0022180253,0.0031488931,0.026336227,0.58914953,0.0809258,0.00032585498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014851113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012863739,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004840781,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047535423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051461265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016194046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114806482","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.461","title":"Aspects of endowment: A query theory of value construction.","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Endowment effect; Order (exchange); Endowment; Value (mathematics); Loss aversion; Economics; Prospect theory; Microeconomics; Construct (python library); Object (grammar); Weighting; Computer science; Mathematics; Finance; Statistics","score_opus":0.08478900968525906,"score_gpt":0.41962833663782756,"score_spread":0.3348393269525685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114806482","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16575308,0.009088992,0.68689555,0.016835313,0.0002998568,0.00032227777,0.0007510296,0.00030103142,0.119752884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92372835,0.0018851206,0.06806952,0.0010693715,0.00025058317,0.00027825014,0.0003203376,0.00007772127,0.0043207197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99810445,0.00087296177,0.00014046252,0.00037294475,0.0003890746,0.00012003998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904615,0.0060932394,0.0009638993,0.0013668849,0.00075338077,0.0003610285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003544507,0.0007091776,0.0006421773,0.0022739451,0.00086899387,0.0049589286,0.0014561081,0.0017909664,0.0068467953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020519106,0.0006233871,0.0013789212,0.0023671754,0.005862439,0.018277377,0.002330905,0.0017644302,0.00086706225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020642526,0.00006176313,0.00472993,0.00014442229,0.00006983619,0.00012226688,0.0031030956,0.001472455,0.0012685532,0.94902086,0.0015679711,0.038232435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032491665,0.000050505718,0.0028322968,0.00003553138,0.000032733384,0.00019540844,0.00042304458,0.010074491,0.00039301364,0.98158747,0.004323864,0.00001907929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013364945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005481497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068467953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016638562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005014739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022904754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119863158","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.14","title":"What Makes an Insight Problem? The Roles of Heuristics, Goal Conception, and Solution Recoding in Knowledge-Lean Problems.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":128,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Heuristics; Heuristic; Computer science; Transformation (genetics); Artificial intelligence; Block (permutation group theory); Selection (genetic algorithm); Theoretical computer science; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics","score_opus":0.048878513268466206,"score_gpt":0.3813567818821498,"score_spread":0.33247826861368357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119863158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9260599,0.00066400267,0.055185735,0.0015520648,0.000024806277,0.00015368871,0.00003648015,0.000091017435,0.016232213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804113,0.00015647782,0.01882318,0.000084028725,0.0000069776315,0.00004182999,0.000042083553,0.000013860779,0.00042032637],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968123,0.0018582966,0.00014814883,0.0003720659,0.00052365824,0.00028554394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95094705,0.040627718,0.004971276,0.0017093145,0.0008100526,0.0009346262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048118434,0.00039701813,0.00030624133,0.00084563374,0.0006033165,0.0042128447,0.0007632003,0.0016916019,0.0017924792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06303338,0.00043831105,0.00038037938,0.0007580561,0.004753298,0.009013696,0.0017213671,0.0020771292,0.0001315699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023174132,0.0018280868,0.10158512,0.0012662014,0.00035358174,0.0012781104,0.07233754,0.017375322,0.03228114,0.35701582,0.0021334195,0.4102282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027591237,0.0011527166,0.080347486,0.00042173528,0.00020180098,0.0016555912,0.038942225,0.07233826,0.01413655,0.7823933,0.007921444,0.00021295313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012934043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015436264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048118434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076836685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011381323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025447726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119875902","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1252","title":"Semantic Ambiguity and the Process of Generating Meaning From Print.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity; Disadvantage; Meaning (existential); Psychology; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021053902174233488,"score_gpt":0.342069373516757,"score_spread":0.3210154713425235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119875902","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313536,0.002773634,0.025646687,0.0014662052,0.00018408168,0.00009526237,0.00012818097,0.000094680174,0.0382576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855252,0.0009368354,0.01050427,0.00029750064,0.000063028914,0.000054624597,0.00013860512,0.00006864992,0.0024113127],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849653,0.00057256175,0.00008001412,0.00019554848,0.000570509,0.000084817606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866703,0.009039531,0.0022316626,0.00082900946,0.0007442459,0.00048526647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028849095,0.0003776309,0.00037649323,0.0008045511,0.00040596563,0.003172434,0.0003511981,0.0009324409,0.0036314102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02999035,0.0003523647,0.00030691418,0.00042800256,0.0020876653,0.0051627844,0.001768026,0.0012810023,0.00059530576],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00527891,0.0008688038,0.0664165,0.0018713209,0.0002720373,0.003127567,0.026999459,0.0029659807,0.3056327,0.17849489,0.0036222867,0.40444946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005350531,0.001834119,0.26524588,0.00042156063,0.0002705728,0.0044022948,0.0067358967,0.016301205,0.08239838,0.60300237,0.018581746,0.00027095343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028979813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002951774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036314102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030749466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003695303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0152570605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122461658","doi":"10.1037/a0019293","title":"A category adjustment approach to memory for spatial location in natural scenes.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Categorical variable; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Natural (archaeology); Perception; Segmentation; Cognitive psychology; Spatial analysis; Bayesian probability; Natural language processing; Pattern recognition (psychology); Psychology; Machine learning; Mathematics; Geography; Statistics","score_opus":0.016354518321802073,"score_gpt":0.2946659572400792,"score_spread":0.27831143891827714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122461658","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28050387,0.0024420065,0.6388452,0.0063089193,0.00048052767,0.0005463334,0.0004607152,0.00049182266,0.06992061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9016267,0.00067136396,0.08898718,0.0011937927,0.0001290502,0.000397962,0.00025011552,0.000050403894,0.006693323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872005,0.00033174572,0.0000714562,0.00038988373,0.0004048806,0.00008203634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669856,0.0012995127,0.00062856515,0.00066900713,0.00049503485,0.00020942591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019682832,0.00035135768,0.00033100555,0.0016089833,0.0005018155,0.0020038872,0.0020744463,0.0008976768,0.004558407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009920945,0.0002909692,0.00089550763,0.0010626707,0.0035781902,0.0035054418,0.0017619535,0.001674959,0.0004922274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069105974,0.0004415664,0.05498746,0.000669143,0.0006370906,0.00047463036,0.006113719,0.008452209,0.03061045,0.5164954,0.0038759303,0.37655124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008988025,0.00059862505,0.06486477,0.00007628182,0.0002287871,0.001662259,0.0012532203,0.051654547,0.0046447157,0.8622804,0.012495994,0.00015048476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035413862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035869312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004558407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016208629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008002994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015249431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123206474","doi":"10.1037/a0024882","title":"Reflections of distraction in memory: Transfer of previous distraction improves recall in younger and older adults.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute on Aging; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; U.S. Public Health Service; University of Washington","keywords":"Distraction; Recall; Task (project management); Psychology; Cued recall; Recall test; Free recall; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Young adult; Relevance (law); Audiology; Medicine","score_opus":0.054722891116964364,"score_gpt":0.35926930889716563,"score_spread":0.30454641778020125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123206474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998718,0.0005770392,0.00011309641,0.000025166675,0.00000915463,0.000011192103,0.000030195286,0.0000050881467,0.00051104196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781835,0.00042163196,0.0003347828,0.000087147186,0.000015826003,0.00001847317,0.00008064087,0.000002390003,0.0012207663],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998666,0.00001724032,0.000017217053,0.00003931773,0.00004096265,0.000018614512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992524,0.00021975634,0.00020786579,0.00009362233,0.000081705904,0.00014469125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007486581,0.0003479417,0.00034132955,0.0002788135,0.00016614822,0.00038381648,0.00022044446,0.0004173261,0.0017457213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002812078,0.00018645656,0.00020614534,0.00010608852,0.0002827675,0.00045097497,0.00036517813,0.0004471562,0.0004232708],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011449158,0.008153892,0.30942678,0.0009088343,0.00054879126,0.0015119541,0.01907088,0.0001793788,0.28627893,0.00040345645,0.0018174276,0.3602504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037060582,0.017142378,0.94142973,0.00005364866,0.00029119034,0.001682147,0.0015486116,0.00021901232,0.033758532,0.0005882835,0.0028828685,0.000032912547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009813602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011451244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017457213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001447932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016818255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005840063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2126172583","doi":"10.1037/a0031338","title":"When does memory monitoring succeed versus fail? Comparing item-specific and relational encoding in the DRM paradigm.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Encoding (memory); Heuristic; Computer science; False memory; Context-dependent memory; Statistical relational learning; Relational database; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Recall; Data mining; Free recall; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09352249904514359,"score_gpt":0.3385871894525084,"score_spread":0.24506469040736478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2126172583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929802,0.00032473993,0.004998298,0.00016167937,0.000027121047,0.00004545734,0.00006207904,0.000043883898,0.0013565097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398583,0.00021597599,0.0048638973,0.0002035036,0.000025462696,0.00006496783,0.0001146377,0.000036468824,0.0004891981],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878913,0.00036520627,0.00014297989,0.0003340004,0.00026149198,0.00010726524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918441,0.0043559535,0.0016464944,0.0014102922,0.00028323906,0.00045991867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034791613,0.0004224666,0.00067454594,0.0004348833,0.00014846852,0.0008850212,0.000718586,0.00093441975,0.0012044413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014018613,0.00042151843,0.00024542937,0.00023970332,0.00069146906,0.0019500314,0.0008371654,0.0011258379,0.00026250398],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068139606,0.0013068126,0.01925186,0.00033514484,0.00012281528,0.0001927909,0.00062937936,0.00039107498,0.89482206,0.0015691933,0.0001787151,0.07438624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007696173,0.019330356,0.34336165,0.00015389925,0.0005686651,0.001570503,0.0007443768,0.014622457,0.60385823,0.012737843,0.0021313077,0.00015103561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004179699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078251207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034791613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034910048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033795877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018399835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128557817","doi":"10.1037/a0013084","title":"Reading aloud: Qualitative differences in the relation between stimulus quality and word frequency as a function of context.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Reading aloud; Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Word lists by frequency; Cognitive psychology; Word recognition; Communication; Word processing; Information processing; Speech recognition; Computer science; Reading (process); Natural language processing; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10889600674680493,"score_gpt":0.4211183359352455,"score_spread":0.31222232918844056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128557817","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918338,0.00037157934,0.0053499797,0.000056545752,0.000014390201,0.000025804036,0.00022222576,0.00010286905,0.002022836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979498,0.00007170591,0.0014549751,0.000028331218,0.0000052485707,0.000018174844,0.000114068695,0.00004578507,0.00031187368],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994166,0.00018219455,0.00003596122,0.00013042854,0.00018970546,0.000045185512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99017006,0.0072355033,0.0012758013,0.00048793256,0.0005754045,0.0002553556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065404427,0.00013433634,0.0002034904,0.0005016324,0.00010602268,0.0006592828,0.00023509344,0.0003115887,0.001762968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012884218,0.00025595323,0.00012241049,0.00046852097,0.00050735695,0.0006890873,0.00047696306,0.00046790903,0.0002630163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010441075,0.00012070927,0.020741869,0.00017445875,0.00006338575,0.0001481536,0.001010364,0.00034189515,0.94885075,0.00075140904,0.00016555288,0.026587429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056463956,0.0009299204,0.7588571,0.000023341703,0.00010160575,0.000649604,0.0005154106,0.003924423,0.2310839,0.0031159632,0.0006853848,0.000057050696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00069045695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000693618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001762968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021030876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013608694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005897701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129162148","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000090","title":"The locus of serial processing in reading aloud: Orthography–to–phonology computation or speech planning?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Phonology; Orthography; Connectionism; Computer science; Dual (grammatical number); Reading (process); Priming (agriculture); Phonological rule; Reading aloud; Linguistics; Psychology; Speech recognition; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.025865862484343312,"score_gpt":0.3712292402607589,"score_spread":0.34536337777641557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129162148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9620025,0.00023753042,0.02670303,0.00056449283,0.000035210687,0.000015888858,0.000046071968,0.00016074533,0.010234457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994323,0.00008622398,0.0048920284,0.000053076285,0.000014832054,0.000009782927,0.000029758849,0.000040561015,0.000550665],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994825,0.00011394944,0.00003376737,0.00018870171,0.00012246335,0.000058644906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957841,0.001892609,0.000702327,0.0011779928,0.00030478166,0.00013819053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084746,0.00024281231,0.00034028268,0.00053170347,0.00020859847,0.0018052866,0.00042357817,0.00075611577,0.0029397684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076939827,0.00041826523,0.0003282314,0.0003110568,0.0024127546,0.0047187232,0.00080987014,0.00093368423,0.00041400126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001889283,0.0007906629,0.085138544,0.0006770274,0.00014191821,0.002182317,0.013899896,0.0031400903,0.479189,0.14766504,0.00056900556,0.26471728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002849505,0.0012230816,0.40409172,0.00018583711,0.00021470766,0.0030662937,0.0056024855,0.029877448,0.26007143,0.29098672,0.004174946,0.00022030013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009265477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072959234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029397684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003168049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045578904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009834468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129452769","doi":"10.1037/a0020125","title":"Making things difficult in lexical decision: The impact of pseudohomophones and transposed-letter nonwords on frequency and semantic priming effects.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Lexicon; Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Lexico; Lexical access; Contrast (vision); Word lists by frequency; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Cognition; Sentence","score_opus":0.01956188019348804,"score_gpt":0.363906535797724,"score_spread":0.34434465560423594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129452769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978009,0.00023230269,0.0004501959,0.00008463026,0.00004516511,0.000033884284,0.00007274636,0.00002856248,0.0012517248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943587,0.00025608632,0.0027414619,0.00028159266,0.00003286974,0.00014134179,0.00014750876,0.0001119323,0.0019285254],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989435,0.0003526577,0.00008150012,0.00031033167,0.00019246837,0.0001196207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857328,0.01028524,0.0017333002,0.00072371075,0.00023513795,0.0012898298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009842194,0.0007026798,0.0005224202,0.00029949838,0.00021956512,0.00078867836,0.0006312955,0.00091017,0.0039907843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009135444,0.0006522686,0.0002518203,0.00021060856,0.0014936855,0.0011467121,0.0010489193,0.0016226395,0.00043744032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016730051,0.0028815875,0.0046554585,0.00031493694,0.00008034741,0.00048314765,0.0008282991,0.0003056829,0.95708567,0.00075373275,0.00021807784,0.015663033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027346683,0.023994334,0.2911551,0.00009582616,0.00057550945,0.0017749547,0.0008180871,0.005167773,0.66256315,0.007621444,0.0032994042,0.00019978175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011611383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011044593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039907843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003065577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045999643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013350546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129887897","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1416","title":"Producing biased diagnoses with unambiguous stimuli: The importance of feature instantiations.","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Medical diagnosis; Heuristic; Psychology; Limit (mathematics); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Linguistics; Medicine","score_opus":0.02582839977103753,"score_gpt":0.3513290148609789,"score_spread":0.3255006150899414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129887897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94131833,0.00093654415,0.04630415,0.0017108218,0.00025587776,0.00020531358,0.000102235455,0.00022261725,0.008944079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749102,0.00018762567,0.023345834,0.0008167556,0.000050406095,0.00007061217,0.000057649515,0.00003762608,0.0005231574],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441755,0.0028804897,0.0003698167,0.0007480533,0.0014201285,0.00016390448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9035553,0.07656978,0.010618201,0.0070984187,0.0012706644,0.00088764686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008662323,0.00039462285,0.00042963887,0.00045505015,0.0003120938,0.0011438319,0.0007005322,0.0013425734,0.0028273896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0972171,0.00040768855,0.00027501862,0.0001506415,0.0019718027,0.0013876879,0.0019170546,0.0011841683,0.00041814646],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00608348,0.0016088649,0.07979668,0.0014505083,0.00034084995,0.0022161547,0.0088658575,0.0015487758,0.5639765,0.024896815,0.0032993536,0.30591622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017857943,0.0092253145,0.1809561,0.0005602519,0.00040540894,0.014892936,0.0029188804,0.016503844,0.631432,0.11430294,0.026623443,0.00039314685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018137522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029377476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008662323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027416673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032664405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045811296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129976542","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.495","title":"On the additive effects of stimulus quality and word frequency in lexical decision: Evidence for opposing interactive influences revealed by RT distributional analyses.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Aging; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Lexical decision task; Stimulus (psychology); Word lists by frequency; Cognitive psychology; Word recognition; Cognition; Lexical access; Dimension (graph theory); Linguistics; Communication; Mathematics","score_opus":0.12534445813798206,"score_gpt":0.4767637082873551,"score_spread":0.35141925014937303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129976542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926743,0.00014926125,0.005403941,0.00003095838,0.0000100948255,0.000033672663,0.00006181472,0.00005368641,0.001582401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99498063,0.000059593167,0.0042169252,0.000048454072,0.000011848086,0.00006394603,0.000059574697,0.000088179135,0.00047083286],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967565,0.0011245154,0.00021496679,0.00081001257,0.0009363833,0.00015758925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9443129,0.047754414,0.0032794438,0.0026191028,0.0008091509,0.0012250338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003882359,0.00040303275,0.00066215603,0.00063551794,0.00017402851,0.00095525396,0.00042401126,0.00038148917,0.002311292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01743304,0.0006444876,0.00042372436,0.00031255474,0.0012419063,0.0009714734,0.0010552136,0.000986401,0.00031774864],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010919831,0.0005300275,0.01840872,0.000248358,0.00016566488,0.0001816496,0.0007079273,0.0010315563,0.94619966,0.00080234546,0.00006257158,0.020741623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003192768,0.0051076273,0.6925072,0.000024790113,0.0005213209,0.0006159594,0.00022424267,0.0143145695,0.2830292,0.0025932142,0.0006300615,0.00011255752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000568425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079370907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003882359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000343613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031556535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020532131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130233214","doi":"10.1037/a0024492","title":"Bilingual lexical access during L1 sentence reading: The effects of L2 knowledge, semantic constraint, and L1–L2 intermixing.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":172,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Cognate; Psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Linguistics; Reading (process); Psycholinguistics; Constraint (computer-aided design); Facilitation; Sentence; Word recognition; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.05105216601639643,"score_gpt":0.3582730672593718,"score_spread":0.30722090124297535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130233214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986873,0.00010379287,0.0001617732,0.000023608642,0.0000033338179,0.000008822376,0.000059277394,0.000009767548,0.00094226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985201,0.00009696416,0.00042580848,0.000040422725,0.0000051450374,0.000032416265,0.00011654679,0.000024099605,0.0007386096],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999833,0.00003512325,0.000010844923,0.000059385537,0.000033591154,0.000028053348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999054,0.00044641842,0.0002357848,0.000048035985,0.00007690241,0.00013882651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027128833,0.00026903683,0.0002961146,0.0002853816,0.00020153902,0.00051345286,0.00014305538,0.0003343519,0.0020727806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023111757,0.00025583856,0.00011642227,0.000169093,0.0003528343,0.0005169851,0.0004999271,0.000405265,0.00023607255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004887606,0.00032052313,0.024664013,0.00018870943,0.000048077527,0.000297791,0.0019358383,0.00006645919,0.95449156,0.00013921941,0.00015354862,0.012806659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016393723,0.0009333462,0.93568593,0.00002144245,0.000071768474,0.00052615494,0.0006794673,0.00067921105,0.06013071,0.0004341132,0.0006435972,0.000030236339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028107385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007489685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028107385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003294167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029827736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006934166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131771717","doi":"10.1037/a0028142","title":"On the prevalence of directly retrieved autobiographical memories.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Autobiographical memory; Cued speech; Recall; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Object (grammar); Representation (politics); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.049544296582394204,"score_gpt":0.3375775602760491,"score_spread":0.2880332636936549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131771717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956943,0.0009866443,0.0011100934,0.00003516392,0.000011537432,0.000019585186,0.00016866259,0.000016990254,0.0019570903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863106,0.00043785363,0.00045461714,0.00002388495,0.0000137144425,0.000017440989,0.00020228747,0.000005380819,0.00021375659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990087,0.00027552803,0.00013112948,0.00023764098,0.00029224207,0.00005471881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98661846,0.0071782595,0.0038458747,0.0011912407,0.0008350358,0.0003311507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017482967,0.00022816943,0.0003096106,0.0015895005,0.00015004243,0.0007617354,0.0003728644,0.0004746323,0.0026102618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01803311,0.00018711801,0.00018006354,0.00058556977,0.0005261224,0.0010829386,0.00080424646,0.0004413495,0.00034101223],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019520134,0.00042208025,0.81623125,0.0006351394,0.0004856333,0.00054091646,0.0034939798,0.00017105405,0.06097623,0.00121093,0.00033096553,0.113549806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016391465,0.00043769786,0.98797786,0.000051033196,0.00009970586,0.0015652716,0.000607283,0.00020061946,0.00785497,0.0005314678,0.0006373406,0.000020449625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040527948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047551107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026102618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015425096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009569957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009245992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135770920","doi":"10.1037/a0022216","title":"Working memory capacity and go/no-go task performance: Selective effects of updating, maintenance, and inhibition.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Task (project management); Working memory; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Go/no go; Lag; Interference theory; Computer science; Cognition; Neuroscience; Machine learning","score_opus":0.07310749179475837,"score_gpt":0.3220389214662227,"score_spread":0.24893142967146434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135770920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984517,0.00025606397,0.0002300409,0.000027980946,0.000005427521,0.000011830672,0.00009556583,0.0000082170445,0.0009130268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991048,0.00007109675,0.00021593196,0.000030677696,0.000005406112,0.000020275367,0.0001603532,0.000008189051,0.00038322833],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966156,0.00008182859,0.00004719968,0.000075934564,0.00009169201,0.000041844844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99360317,0.0023296801,0.0023015111,0.0008090378,0.00019776367,0.00075874326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010033365,0.00056357647,0.00034585063,0.0005236876,0.0001576807,0.00053871964,0.00046200844,0.00042405006,0.0020248292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006149881,0.00023472053,0.0001526466,0.00029112736,0.0006985365,0.00046037044,0.0007294793,0.0007642698,0.00030412665],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015439041,0.00478815,0.63380265,0.0003277994,0.0011712022,0.0006047856,0.0020214645,0.00074801006,0.27595147,0.00079576025,0.00064788887,0.0637018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004480454,0.0010213725,0.98892456,0.000013253648,0.00009424744,0.0002726677,0.00008752715,0.00051098707,0.008342881,0.00045536287,0.0002151221,0.000017291952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007469516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010012906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020248292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016144957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020871089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0067737103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140340692","doi":"10.1037/a0028074","title":"Location memory for dots in polygons versus cities in regions: Evaluating the category adjustment model.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Polygon (computer graphics); Centroid; Cued speech; Bayesian probability; Recall; Artificial intelligence; Perception; Extant taxon; Mathematics; Psychology; Computer science; Cartography; Pattern recognition (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.10513808695225421,"score_gpt":0.4278534910132443,"score_spread":0.3227154040609901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140340692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98676944,0.00011296385,0.010978678,0.0001711739,0.000034285127,0.00017049258,0.00009157771,0.000050110815,0.0016213757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897008,0.00006966316,0.009399502,0.000096406,0.000016949196,0.000101025005,0.000193638,0.00002067017,0.00040127532],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99641246,0.0014180726,0.00024323897,0.00095804804,0.00074490986,0.0002232476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92075205,0.062233333,0.0072256764,0.0059362724,0.0024003312,0.001452483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013702638,0.00083713024,0.00066949404,0.00058902043,0.00041640975,0.0024636819,0.0023989347,0.0021126885,0.0022927227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0973478,0.0006588814,0.0006793141,0.00042404438,0.0018803765,0.0057139774,0.0017580782,0.0014329794,0.00040658127],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05506013,0.0067418627,0.4344951,0.0017743751,0.0016299455,0.0008673127,0.014846682,0.086428374,0.123428166,0.027826356,0.003365532,0.24353622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024433248,0.014976635,0.22720785,0.00020636326,0.0011051904,0.0010912993,0.0038900087,0.6642923,0.031716596,0.049021624,0.003447734,0.00060097245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01084525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068296874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013702638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017772255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009982921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07246739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143047424","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.556","title":"Revisiting evidence for modularity and functional equivalence across verbal and spatial domains in memory.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recall; Spatial memory; Interference theory; Verbal memory; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Modularity (biology); Short-term memory; Articulatory suppression; Equivalence (formal languages); Working memory; Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Cognition; Mathematics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.14129670465172356,"score_gpt":0.40085383712821326,"score_spread":0.2595571324764897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143047424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88226235,0.005629514,0.09447188,0.006247936,0.00022847025,0.000054660723,0.00023568983,0.00030459184,0.010564877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845746,0.001125936,0.013110475,0.00042795666,0.000047830174,0.000033455166,0.0000809871,0.000029724128,0.0005689301],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989586,0.00025360117,0.00013068534,0.00028866535,0.0003118872,0.000056638066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755525,0.017051864,0.0019242164,0.0034668047,0.0016685945,0.0003359883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050344863,0.0006174869,0.00069312175,0.0015174688,0.0003434781,0.0020865707,0.0019017943,0.0009310135,0.001887687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026142031,0.000457261,0.0008867254,0.0009968693,0.004814128,0.004329489,0.002437209,0.0018547694,0.00020483106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029151656,0.00064348715,0.11919731,0.002859894,0.0015257364,0.003799945,0.025760189,0.015820233,0.10660428,0.35066628,0.0033093079,0.36689827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033820214,0.0018282991,0.17133002,0.0011513093,0.001414736,0.003925532,0.0052734944,0.07000207,0.0566115,0.6676846,0.0201189,0.00032131007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013887892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015635785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050344863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007493708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007595475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026625276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144440751","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859","title":"Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":917,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital; York University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Working memory; Task (project management); Executive functions; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Lexical access; Cognitive psychology; Control (management); Multilingualism; Elementary cognitive task; Developmental psychology; Task analysis","score_opus":0.0560846885379266,"score_gpt":0.38097805217973024,"score_spread":0.32489336364180366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144440751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99952435,0.00009695753,0.000010178435,0.000009113933,0.0000030523138,0.000003009638,0.00003730236,9.3669155e-7,0.00031516113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994186,0.000060065347,0.00002802381,0.000026116131,0.000005522648,0.000005093717,0.00008278172,0.0000010191933,0.00037282053],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984086,0.000015458587,0.000026392445,0.000032113614,0.000044886412,0.000040243096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989458,0.0001680617,0.00040047243,0.000044476998,0.00015100079,0.00029025803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004399226,0.00036381077,0.00039719456,0.00083710597,0.0004554876,0.000767826,0.0001271241,0.00040937602,0.0023805709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024159579,0.00021585515,0.00021067445,0.000275334,0.00039355326,0.0004566231,0.00041769847,0.00034396764,0.0003768895],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029750608,0.0008909989,0.9539577,0.000075316566,0.0001228032,0.0016870796,0.010512474,0.00007364655,0.011845909,0.00011551519,0.00029515484,0.017448397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007311109,0.00062293577,0.9958968,0.0000058126016,0.00002535583,0.0010821243,0.0013123001,0.00009731766,0.0004764163,0.000101693346,0.0002947892,0.000011351222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006956397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010629194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006956397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028709267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018888352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013831794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147381218","doi":"10.1037/a0022964","title":"Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line language comprehension.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Comprehension; Psychology; Noun; Event (particle physics); Cognitive psychology; Verb; Sentence; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.10246410818735278,"score_gpt":0.37894962458359416,"score_spread":0.27648551639624136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147381218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893289,0.000109026965,0.006813786,0.000057794052,0.000009741053,0.000018663026,0.00004988415,0.000058991744,0.0035531241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997323,0.000050469946,0.0021412896,0.000020557456,0.00000372756,0.000009182875,0.000059382495,0.000029555715,0.000362919],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993376,0.00022637448,0.00004325285,0.00019589228,0.00016134926,0.00003556722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99273336,0.0051243957,0.0011949671,0.0004846949,0.00026442355,0.0001982232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012011033,0.00032041158,0.00024560353,0.00025922793,0.00013451581,0.0011379881,0.0003134559,0.00044263664,0.0022259017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010922981,0.00020203329,0.00023086258,0.00011124796,0.0005075163,0.0015114811,0.0006498782,0.00047805248,0.00021262324],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016794266,0.0004568066,0.07254742,0.00031955118,0.00013854796,0.0009133688,0.0076657264,0.0012989566,0.81838083,0.005442604,0.0003119491,0.09084486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091587084,0.002198327,0.7987539,0.000069307906,0.00017502981,0.0017417476,0.0026746506,0.011259562,0.1552328,0.024727384,0.0029769386,0.000098829245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003991012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004494375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022259017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027515343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017681508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0074464083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151978331","doi":"10.1037/a0033776","title":"Connecting spatial memories of two nested spaces.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Heading (navigation); Bearing (navigation); Beijing; Computer science; Table (database); Point (geometry); Cardinal direction; Artificial intelligence; Cartography; Geography; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Geodesy; Geometry; Data mining","score_opus":0.01592348034931858,"score_gpt":0.2957157321355997,"score_spread":0.27979225178628114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151978331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908379,0.00028830828,0.0064712237,0.0001019322,0.000021648271,0.000054623524,0.000051506147,0.000070706905,0.0021020991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930607,0.00009358882,0.005861791,0.00005840446,0.000005172476,0.000035221747,0.000104654086,0.000008537533,0.0007718835],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999355,0.00017095437,0.000048655635,0.00022675675,0.00012809594,0.000070551716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515027,0.0021366533,0.0009728668,0.0011866142,0.00029012837,0.00026344383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014382935,0.00044168258,0.00028935002,0.00040088003,0.0003151958,0.0011312255,0.00086687756,0.00082830916,0.004218658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010117557,0.00041688854,0.00033505293,0.00025902237,0.001410382,0.0036425758,0.0015873966,0.00084637856,0.00032558045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009133122,0.0031658139,0.16062275,0.0029589566,0.0010589813,0.0017774968,0.08830169,0.007776124,0.30385077,0.028606484,0.0044283275,0.38831952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030145373,0.022368347,0.44317472,0.0010102512,0.0016050141,0.0069736987,0.055374436,0.037717152,0.21365558,0.15875691,0.05544181,0.0009075688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000648575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010514015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004218658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027256436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000248117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01411283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153500685","doi":"10.1037/a0029668","title":"Experimentally evoking nonbelieved memories for childhood events.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Debriefing; Psychology; False memory; Childhood memory; Suggestibility; Childhood amnesia; Narrative; Cognitive psychology; Recall; Developmental psychology; Memory errors; Event (particle physics); Autobiographical memory; Episodic memory; Social psychology; Cognition; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.04787677393912393,"score_gpt":0.35714516022574117,"score_spread":0.30926838628661724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153500685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99866307,0.00013660808,0.00067130325,0.000020693968,0.0000042950214,0.000024431332,0.000014492034,0.0000030382053,0.00046207855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694306,0.00020357795,0.0023188915,0.000025842497,0.0000038440794,0.000042165982,0.00004041955,0.0000022991487,0.0004198501],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951816,0.00021430811,0.00003194493,0.000073316085,0.0001093987,0.000052903222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975617,0.001519244,0.00055687974,0.00019682915,0.00006512332,0.00010011183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008480917,0.00038457205,0.0001553438,0.00012609237,0.00027371306,0.0004159347,0.00030310254,0.00039235453,0.0014669291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004060724,0.00022637608,0.00013327964,0.00007026553,0.00056167546,0.00039743318,0.00075783907,0.0006717107,0.00014360945],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01022382,0.003981247,0.1315007,0.0016307643,0.00023272466,0.0036645024,0.04031971,0.0006945583,0.7159991,0.0035350637,0.00047952478,0.08773815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053106475,0.03643975,0.49659014,0.00034220397,0.00034156977,0.010687431,0.015642285,0.0019134008,0.42412096,0.0034735054,0.009759396,0.00015826225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004026865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001608507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014669291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020185538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002458922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0049073696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154520591","doi":"10.1037/a0030535","title":"Defining a boundary in goal localization: Infinite number of points or extended surfaces.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Boundary (topology); Landmark; Mathematics; Boundary value problem; Geometry; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02424194231328537,"score_gpt":0.356228354518386,"score_spread":0.33198641220510067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154520591","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95773506,0.00028734718,0.037840262,0.000079924044,0.000026588514,0.000030550527,0.000018025637,0.0001016681,0.0038805509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866665,0.000054690885,0.013031002,0.000015800848,0.0000050834174,0.00001863509,0.00001657493,0.000015174342,0.0001765403],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862635,0.00045336309,0.000108243024,0.0002688126,0.00043542162,0.000107784734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9893489,0.0064185136,0.0017486124,0.0013645416,0.0004413871,0.0006781157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019546982,0.0004200291,0.0005330027,0.0003141599,0.00024763064,0.0006826831,0.00055385026,0.00090539135,0.002598685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018293273,0.0003157119,0.00038105715,0.00017541174,0.002217418,0.0039364244,0.0024666896,0.000632114,0.00020404121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006993682,0.00061571086,0.024835097,0.0013268266,0.00012656617,0.0010043447,0.0026704636,0.018326463,0.6582137,0.038566638,0.00044501567,0.24687554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012648957,0.015838973,0.23914798,0.00039345172,0.0005201483,0.004929202,0.0046633957,0.15191615,0.3735869,0.19833504,0.009129396,0.00027450413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030975262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031026007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002598685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024882247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002753025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010337591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158602867","doi":"10.1037/a0014361","title":"The cross-script length effect: Further evidence challenging PDP models of reading aloud.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Macquarie University","keywords":"Psychology; Reading aloud; Kana; Orthography; Linguistics; Lexical access; Cognitive psychology; Phonology; Reading (process); Articulatory suppression; Lexical decision task; Kanji; Cognition; Short-term memory; Chinese characters; Working memory","score_opus":0.040447219594175784,"score_gpt":0.38038166023319064,"score_spread":0.33993444063901485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158602867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96665925,0.0006585787,0.009312743,0.0006646459,0.00008836619,0.000102400074,0.00055760675,0.00018122801,0.021775275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929919,0.00012675195,0.00360461,0.00043838972,0.00004484882,0.00010222913,0.00029319248,0.00012981151,0.0022683141],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965765,0.0010408071,0.00032228467,0.00084733905,0.0011125981,0.00010041703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.892703,0.07194911,0.014685424,0.014573827,0.0040058275,0.0020827902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00500984,0.0005099212,0.0005767744,0.0009046579,0.00031385216,0.0010785897,0.0010765868,0.00067762774,0.010912096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042477477,0.00036963864,0.00039416185,0.00055844587,0.001634468,0.002184385,0.0020560327,0.0014311172,0.0012242671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010300946,0.003021739,0.21925174,0.0017867665,0.000551224,0.0018587282,0.0126963435,0.00050547405,0.60854644,0.012327166,0.0024622327,0.12669133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001718808,0.0022160378,0.94027406,0.000058863843,0.00020062753,0.002191497,0.0007948144,0.0018409363,0.04259324,0.006381314,0.003214832,0.00006180915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081778166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009405006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010912096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035579174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003266322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036504567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160498168","doi":"10.1037/a0028456","title":"Geometry three ways: An fMRI investigation of geometric information processing during reorientation.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory and Neural Mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Functional magnetic resonance imaging; Geometry; Parahippocampal gyrus; Cortex (anatomy); Hippocampus; Temporal lobe; Psychology; Neuroscience; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09620071596023652,"score_gpt":0.3477959408002401,"score_spread":0.25159522484000363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160498168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925262,0.00035398128,0.004619988,0.00012168409,0.000017459479,0.00003953877,0.00012080889,0.00003655086,0.0021638111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911344,0.00030219715,0.006862251,0.00011650816,0.000018588047,0.000047594065,0.00012052655,0.000018648096,0.001379333],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999716,0.000003893053,0.0000010600602,0.00001164571,0.000004940448,0.0000068394643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999938,0.00001707937,0.000015066886,0.000004685995,0.000008024598,0.000017184817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009588656,0.00020250831,0.00010724684,0.00014470487,0.000110748064,0.00017132304,0.0001415283,0.00025026881,0.00095986854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024113806,0.00012930257,0.00011452028,0.00007903698,0.0002448997,0.00026342864,0.00013912108,0.00028666217,0.00012279852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042024202,0.00015672403,0.006841121,0.00009496405,0.000029717106,0.0006592026,0.00048798,0.00012384739,0.9634132,0.00038275972,0.00043142785,0.02695885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018834948,0.0033497578,0.79022074,0.000057140438,0.00019895738,0.00845644,0.0010717803,0.004557415,0.1814449,0.0029527822,0.007446629,0.000055079232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068662275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023264452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00095986854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009383856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013453657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003211081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160699897","doi":"10.1037/a0034976","title":"Use of geometric properties of landmark arrays for reorientation relative to remote cities and local objects.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Landmark; Rectangle; Salience (neuroscience); Orientation (vector space); Geometry; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Spatial configuration; Geography; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Computer vision; Psychology; Cartography; Geology; Mathematics; Distribution (mathematics); Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.04077813799702325,"score_gpt":0.2859789612352004,"score_spread":0.24520082323817716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160699897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924319,0.00020658463,0.004724104,0.000039267627,0.000011497635,0.000030418973,0.00007049815,0.00007558898,0.0024101136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930351,0.0000629417,0.0064425417,0.000018112609,0.0000027364313,0.00001524958,0.000106800566,0.000019022516,0.00029764592],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995913,0.00009211089,0.00003403452,0.0001500899,0.000096206495,0.000036315105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671656,0.0011349033,0.0010395437,0.0006241692,0.00025923637,0.0002255339],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063860114,0.0005016288,0.00023541534,0.00022959229,0.0001836369,0.0006342841,0.00039220045,0.0004057923,0.0017864871],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006471422,0.00035801643,0.00029301643,0.00017632566,0.0005868546,0.0010488599,0.0005619279,0.0003939656,0.00025125145],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017933485,0.00045479194,0.18285537,0.0009458257,0.00025959988,0.0007183262,0.0061201253,0.0050065704,0.6440942,0.0022154127,0.0011892713,0.15434712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025275987,0.0037886405,0.84017366,0.000086364846,0.00031499838,0.0017967813,0.0034824472,0.009076873,0.12928493,0.0037427305,0.007827205,0.0001725717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015562071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031629782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017864871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020616598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018610418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0059764385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2161108365","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.34.2.422","title":"Reading aloud: Spelling-sound translation uses central attention.","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Reading aloud; Stimulus onset asynchrony; Lexicon; Repetition (rhetorical device); Cognitive psychology; Spelling; Orthography; Linguistics; Cognition; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.055934698603075435,"score_gpt":0.3506759378666312,"score_spread":0.2947412392635558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2161108365","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859248,0.00025469813,0.009206337,0.00008875289,0.000042575088,0.000034190998,0.000045968485,0.00016499418,0.004237751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935347,0.00014347861,0.004796467,0.000062787054,0.000022953183,0.000025022193,0.000087466644,0.00006713768,0.0012599821],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994886,0.00016670798,0.000032529228,0.00015348269,0.00012290366,0.000035715224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672526,0.0019030706,0.00060670066,0.0003735827,0.00019921169,0.0001921947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005498449,0.00034798816,0.00025424318,0.00022646526,0.00018436095,0.00077521405,0.00023085884,0.0003937604,0.0019073943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004820435,0.00018353782,0.00016655667,0.00014554316,0.00046034736,0.0008336671,0.0005312544,0.00046003787,0.0004707966],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009125131,0.00020248684,0.0045379843,0.00011244818,0.00002600398,0.0003152328,0.0006546321,0.000111342124,0.9504862,0.0007669774,0.00014390299,0.041730314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018209474,0.003311745,0.29981542,0.000041225117,0.00015603294,0.0025585326,0.0008563695,0.006545503,0.6765148,0.006509774,0.00344256,0.000065845394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000503451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007666584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019073943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020309053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026067434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0063809156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171985160","doi":"10.1037/a0021804","title":"When does length cause the word length effect?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Consonant; Syllable; Orthographic projection; Word length; Word (group theory); Speech recognition; Recall; Offset (computer science); Vowel length; Linguistics; Computer science; Mathematics; Psychology; Vowel; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.028073375584390627,"score_gpt":0.3365002491441942,"score_spread":0.3084268735598036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171985160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95065236,0.009147343,0.012991366,0.0054702368,0.0008569981,0.00028654802,0.0012232469,0.00055042066,0.018821372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98209697,0.0019126195,0.005343261,0.0026841417,0.00055549067,0.00020475332,0.0006183215,0.00045872125,0.0061256876],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979372,0.00049449847,0.00017051415,0.00076605205,0.00048934395,0.00014253758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983752,0.010968047,0.0022791445,0.0014996912,0.0008904828,0.0006106381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032525067,0.0005812586,0.0010480303,0.0007200135,0.0003906061,0.0013890385,0.0013770997,0.0018329726,0.012199533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024453284,0.0005405363,0.00077707274,0.000545522,0.0018040206,0.0029548653,0.0011555095,0.0014938214,0.0014409607],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015613195,0.0025031602,0.3436554,0.0034909926,0.0016022029,0.003113686,0.0043638223,0.0015670354,0.29281268,0.03534524,0.008215045,0.28771743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010237842,0.0038647675,0.84359694,0.00038634555,0.001137379,0.0031261584,0.0010204063,0.0024796508,0.04853694,0.08124012,0.0133617725,0.000225631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014248976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010504513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012199533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005931426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065992086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04081148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253944897","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000230","title":"Dissociating appraisals of accuracy and recollection in autobiographical remembering.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Recall; Autobiographical memory; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; PsycINFO; Dissociation (chemistry); Developmental psychology; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.044120901716514886,"score_gpt":0.36287618223085405,"score_spread":0.31875528051433916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253944897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99718326,0.00031988102,0.00088428805,0.00005957042,0.0000047218255,0.000012370741,0.00008127733,0.0000064536016,0.001448086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913174,0.00012227078,0.0004461899,0.000016353517,0.0000054047323,0.000009142897,0.00013223194,0.000003477,0.0001332627],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860793,0.000441206,0.00015238587,0.00019461324,0.00052197877,0.00008188434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97120947,0.01486235,0.0084485,0.002720313,0.0020510943,0.00070827187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028000723,0.00026482195,0.00029912998,0.0011887861,0.00021631437,0.0013172908,0.0002868248,0.0004174604,0.0011071069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04486749,0.00026947042,0.0002360498,0.0006878295,0.0007380965,0.0014898408,0.001039464,0.0007825505,0.00014643617],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013564279,0.00024408103,0.90953493,0.00023541575,0.0004342097,0.00016563993,0.009513311,0.00040354606,0.012312655,0.0012454139,0.00022845126,0.06432588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066405432,0.000115005336,0.99707925,0.00001650718,0.000023942726,0.00013644426,0.0005937065,0.0003425177,0.0008440778,0.00070561434,0.00012570684,0.000010576742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019780912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003297416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028000723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041764652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022981064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014808416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2314541179","doi":"10.1037/a0036588","title":"Associative asymmetry of compound words.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Associative property; Representation (politics); Psychology; Recall; Association (psychology); Cued recall; Cognitive psychology; Asymmetry; Free recall; Mathematics; Pure mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.038664685633709735,"score_gpt":0.3477246585899853,"score_spread":0.3090599729562756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2314541179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866099,0.00036860723,0.0074924575,0.00005031421,0.0000279911,0.000049758062,0.00032614885,0.00008371971,0.004991088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959209,0.00012675514,0.0026981002,0.000031596686,0.000008710744,0.00002051873,0.00025936533,0.000014696164,0.00091938936],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993081,0.00008684406,0.00008386303,0.00018169572,0.00029681454,0.0000426075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942298,0.002250624,0.001430512,0.0014044016,0.00046060214,0.0002240155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006963919,0.00030061233,0.0003711009,0.0006130388,0.00017530323,0.0007683006,0.00044322058,0.00032271264,0.004090416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006636358,0.00018115362,0.0002122234,0.0004103952,0.0005590405,0.0015414768,0.0009194336,0.00054278556,0.00040097922],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028289885,0.0003262645,0.06011321,0.00056370633,0.00021905021,0.0006251609,0.0010429706,0.0013822645,0.7370936,0.0077789132,0.0004372821,0.18758857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013063688,0.0037605113,0.48683414,0.0001088676,0.0004479012,0.007722557,0.00093520817,0.010058692,0.44297287,0.039785124,0.007095902,0.0001476061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040932096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005298278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004090416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029412704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002947283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0136838555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2315291046","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000069","title":"Disruption of relational processing underlies poor memory for order.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Encoding (memory); Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Semantic memory; Levels-of-processing effect; Psychology; Distraction; Computer science; Order (exchange); Memory errors; Episodic memory; Impaired memory; Recall; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.062233402805937706,"score_gpt":0.3626143385826715,"score_spread":0.3003809357767338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2315291046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948237,0.0006399127,0.0021658242,0.00020733506,0.000021582176,0.000030969426,0.00013666945,0.000057457702,0.0019165798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99822193,0.00021195669,0.0009734678,0.000067172856,0.000009066554,0.000009098569,0.00011271663,0.0000066354537,0.0003879678],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996407,0.000045430817,0.000051254905,0.00011486923,0.00011095201,0.000036806858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695253,0.00046437106,0.0015319,0.00064416835,0.0001608692,0.00024601026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000740909,0.00054233434,0.00041267497,0.001023234,0.00032999003,0.0006475183,0.0005598686,0.0005538775,0.0017803345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030920927,0.00027307,0.00020752127,0.00032961997,0.001543184,0.00097251654,0.00074753485,0.00086315785,0.00036093104],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031267044,0.0011515673,0.47928748,0.00053111435,0.000485877,0.0042596557,0.0020304935,0.00042828187,0.41989,0.0053227777,0.0015544433,0.08193169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008755911,0.0024914301,0.8887287,0.00005719203,0.00025743793,0.01940655,0.00073250633,0.0011673725,0.070462056,0.014142428,0.0024063261,0.000060368584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012433094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018317002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017803345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042236975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028929074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0059558153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316629803","doi":"10.1037/a0034977","title":"Testing the item-order account of design effects using the production effect.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Recall; Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Cognitive psychology; Joins; Reading (process); Free recall; Production (economics); Natural language processing; Information retrieval; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07556654426445038,"score_gpt":0.3488449355293874,"score_spread":0.273278391264937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316629803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85306305,0.0012553032,0.113696985,0.0010236945,0.0008076679,0.002185118,0.0016946836,0.0010051532,0.02526837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395531,0.00019657893,0.050824046,0.0008759166,0.00020541753,0.0023397976,0.0007446072,0.00044388892,0.0048167147],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787475,0.009598982,0.0014213221,0.0056614983,0.0039710607,0.0005995794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7127322,0.23549461,0.017523725,0.027436715,0.005108324,0.0017044471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032863285,0.002277671,0.0018028805,0.001543983,0.00079199136,0.0023347195,0.0031608844,0.0031579155,0.016093947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12104677,0.0012752934,0.002387366,0.000790207,0.0032200909,0.0047655334,0.004196525,0.0032555906,0.0013184142],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0820193,0.013770501,0.23067352,0.005297872,0.008426267,0.0024176475,0.010889338,0.0078100176,0.3667901,0.077403866,0.005416129,0.18908547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011683787,0.054511625,0.55013245,0.00029460492,0.0068986,0.0044102897,0.0010874224,0.07167826,0.1625621,0.11798978,0.018113798,0.0006373288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014285981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009927067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032863285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013432864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008307762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17379975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2317160748","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000032","title":"Piloting and path integration within and across boundaries.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Hangzhou Normal University","keywords":"Path integration; Position (finance); Path (computing); Boundary (topology); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.014654528090783402,"score_gpt":0.2984105171695147,"score_spread":0.28375598907873134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2317160748","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945028,0.00011944427,0.0045170705,0.000018875644,0.0000075091866,0.000014391201,0.000013192022,0.000027588594,0.0007791408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542516,0.000059497273,0.004097812,0.000016383954,0.0000023808532,0.0000174104,0.000035578745,0.0000091788625,0.00033651883],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989988,0.00022634413,0.000104272665,0.00029789057,0.00024082536,0.000131814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912282,0.0036845715,0.0024540676,0.0011437337,0.000658546,0.00083091366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013133497,0.0005034951,0.0004549764,0.00037947134,0.00021019031,0.00082741777,0.00043204767,0.000611906,0.0015504181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011813706,0.00025600058,0.00022605859,0.00020940894,0.0011702307,0.0016788545,0.0010293493,0.0006693553,0.00013041291],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004810506,0.0015644436,0.08198565,0.0008158957,0.00027300988,0.00046942732,0.004506672,0.0043154624,0.66343975,0.0020377862,0.00034432104,0.23543696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041401718,0.017460622,0.68408,0.00019917518,0.00057837134,0.0020250853,0.0030484234,0.024645234,0.2506914,0.012168051,0.0044683823,0.00022118872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013151391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014433607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015504181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023799989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043936374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069457293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2318753404","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000093","title":"Second-language experience modulates eye movements during first- and second-language sentence reading: Evidence from a gaze-contingent moving window paradigm.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music","keywords":"Fluency; Fixation (population genetics); Eye movement; Psychology; Reading (process); Gaze; Sentence; Cognitive psychology; Eye tracking; Perception; Dyslexia; Audiology; Linguistics; Computer science; Population; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017913571149206556,"score_gpt":0.3205627619444048,"score_spread":0.30264919079519825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2318753404","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977458,0.00032505734,0.0010320375,0.000040624793,0.000012576443,0.00002762234,0.00012255006,0.000019457591,0.0006743331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962716,0.00032941278,0.0021079415,0.000101252794,0.0000121290395,0.00012054655,0.0002174449,0.000017392149,0.00082220545],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998499,0.00003111429,0.000009581889,0.00005716575,0.000030989086,0.000021209971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961793,0.000112256355,0.00014311928,0.000028580158,0.000041140946,0.000056996494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019831293,0.00029161407,0.00020345607,0.00023716583,0.0001628109,0.0002054321,0.00015789193,0.000311849,0.0013142964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080426293,0.000167761,0.00018095906,0.00011752899,0.00020626449,0.00022861824,0.0002899037,0.0005453021,0.00013165337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060103176,0.00012416008,0.005506619,0.000074532334,0.000020433175,0.00005718452,0.0002630819,0.000012830695,0.9892547,0.000042438292,0.00007005886,0.0039728447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007495034,0.0017596199,0.8855785,0.000020357562,0.00006585749,0.00034190068,0.00026431173,0.00051883893,0.110504255,0.00014604646,0.00070876203,0.000016571807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017094575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039791507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0017094575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017737351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019628894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0043967366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319639016","doi":"10.1037/a0035259","title":"One spatial map or many? Spatial coding of connected environments.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory and Neural Mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"ENCODE; Coding (social sciences); Representation (politics); Spatial analysis; Spatial ecology; Computer science; Spatial relation; Geography; Spatial cognition; Cartography; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Ecology; Biology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.08375031125229217,"score_gpt":0.33433821171148487,"score_spread":0.2505879004591927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319639016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84110504,0.00073051755,0.13979305,0.001064533,0.00008340207,0.000028039032,0.00031512105,0.00021175179,0.016668579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836271,0.00012210164,0.015086286,0.00004648505,0.0000070148067,0.0000076972665,0.000062044324,0.000017048704,0.0010241052],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999877,0.000025530908,0.0000042326606,0.000052670614,0.000025124617,0.000015353653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925774,0.00028287532,0.0001458067,0.00013049689,0.0000810014,0.000102010956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017704218,0.00018737014,0.00016452302,0.00030858893,0.0001818757,0.0008709498,0.00031251065,0.0002670043,0.0028055683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034136565,0.00015599113,0.00016930175,0.00024379519,0.0009587896,0.0024949992,0.00074388186,0.00033117,0.00023037533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013383364,0.00013243314,0.07311705,0.00053400395,0.00022475641,0.0005947004,0.0070445747,0.03551966,0.14693642,0.2531801,0.005460383,0.47591764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079913465,0.00036306604,0.08832395,0.00018039098,0.00014589602,0.00143195,0.003287352,0.308621,0.029211905,0.5513444,0.016877467,0.00013274346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014504478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002014554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028055683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016871067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017687478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009385526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321074599","doi":"10.1037/a0035154","title":"Activation of lexical and semantic representations without intention along GPC-sublexical and orthographic-lexical reading pathways in a Stroop paradigm.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Stroop effect; Pronunciation; Reading (process); Lexical decision task; Orthographic projection; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03763596655948456,"score_gpt":0.35141062618978475,"score_spread":0.31377465963030016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321074599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9881275,0.000107569984,0.007131547,0.00010874564,0.000032866614,0.00014581892,0.00011748187,0.000054025964,0.0041743475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869912,0.00011377111,0.010886664,0.00017246522,0.000020101796,0.00030969756,0.00013970428,0.00005293866,0.0013134303],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964833,0.00007899147,0.000022767883,0.00012222846,0.00008649897,0.000041180232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889046,0.0004758445,0.00026284994,0.0001246456,0.00010681041,0.000139449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042750753,0.00037488778,0.00020006305,0.00040146877,0.00021256079,0.000584265,0.00034478286,0.00053911674,0.0023333682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018738982,0.00036686155,0.00020261995,0.00019123573,0.000916597,0.0010004916,0.0010797534,0.000790917,0.00024046695],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008350891,0.0001925473,0.0011737625,0.00013839635,0.000018446863,0.00007661991,0.0005223034,0.000063004605,0.9850464,0.0012114455,0.000087249624,0.010634669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013555154,0.0072790454,0.32079452,0.000073506286,0.00022184894,0.0015972772,0.0014322478,0.0063311807,0.6398049,0.01752709,0.0034915488,0.00009134964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031135706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007789402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0023333682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018711697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004561915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007805884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2321420038","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000196","title":"Operator priming and generalization of practice in adults’ simple arithmetic.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Generalization; Operator (biology); Multiplication (music); Simple (philosophy); Arithmetic; Mathematics; Generality; Priming (agriculture); Algebra over a field; Computer science; Discrete mathematics; Algorithm; Psychology; Combinatorics; Pure mathematics; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.04538416919637378,"score_gpt":0.3804201707591195,"score_spread":0.3350360015627457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2321420038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99729174,0.00017535474,0.00034960167,0.00003572864,0.000008991027,0.000021702572,0.00004301037,0.000012954032,0.0020608664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975229,0.00013496056,0.0009015154,0.00005301725,0.000012592773,0.000046970275,0.00007590229,0.000010421491,0.0012417028],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941456,0.00010419158,0.00003946596,0.00023146001,0.00017020013,0.000040160965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934382,0.003487297,0.0014278145,0.000721461,0.00034621885,0.00057914545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001100223,0.00025166335,0.0003339282,0.00032820794,0.00015994655,0.00039936666,0.00022926329,0.00049325457,0.0039770175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008203018,0.0003261325,0.00016101402,0.00014291563,0.00065187085,0.0009437388,0.00075545313,0.0006489494,0.00047147897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007998513,0.0022317583,0.15546341,0.00071598653,0.000107446685,0.00058293954,0.013359749,0.00052866235,0.6797654,0.0023938455,0.0007984634,0.13605392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019081107,0.0049300687,0.9618534,0.00005601111,0.000053427422,0.00085252174,0.00053574494,0.001216006,0.026151044,0.0022368631,0.0018929397,0.000031244614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010367503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011194369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039770175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002110492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002400203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013304472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322156578","doi":"10.1037/a0035584","title":"Availability of semantic knowledge in familiar-only experiences for names.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Recall; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Semantic memory; Semantic similarity; Feeling; Categorical variable; Metamemory; Social psychology; Metacognition; Cognition; Natural language processing; Computer science","score_opus":0.044419698945781794,"score_gpt":0.35937873443156165,"score_spread":0.31495903548577986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322156578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980445,0.000069271955,0.00062941207,0.000019756048,0.000005525226,0.000005275215,0.000026194384,0.000008827719,0.0011912764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99945337,0.000026168247,0.00030179747,0.000015702812,0.0000034410389,0.000003834918,0.000033524644,0.0000034024126,0.00015879847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994165,0.00012781547,0.00006379949,0.00015480471,0.00016182153,0.00007530512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9911533,0.0039036178,0.002466934,0.0013942226,0.00038926952,0.000692659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012200959,0.00014726148,0.00023200453,0.00042490507,0.00027049283,0.0010890508,0.00021114865,0.0006239307,0.002453321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0127826575,0.00022739239,0.00019211609,0.0002092006,0.0012255271,0.0017454056,0.0013882819,0.000621227,0.00016722566],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054584392,0.0010978435,0.45027733,0.0010301823,0.0002740794,0.0029310624,0.038689572,0.0008518874,0.40385228,0.0053972625,0.0006349203,0.089505084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003006051,0.0010928604,0.9727912,0.00005594575,0.00006547449,0.0031970304,0.00340991,0.00058145844,0.013651178,0.004034445,0.0010235142,0.000067052104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003680547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006898439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002453321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000205652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016232664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008207202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2322436276","doi":"10.1037/a0023586","title":"\"Hindsight bias from 3 to 95 years of age\": Correction to Bernstein et al. (2011).","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Psychology; Bernstein polynomial; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.22009332300850729,"score_gpt":0.4338916762259025,"score_spread":0.21379835321739524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2322436276","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089245377,0.008690197,0.0019711852,0.16446535,0.8085156,0.00010689639,0.011752528,0.00073718705,0.0028686323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04442556,0.019851957,0.012565778,0.4367079,0.37827712,0.0017650953,0.010757934,0.0011279988,0.0945207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497753,0.0009902334,0.0008307855,0.0011787326,0.0015348337,0.00048786384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97005826,0.01181522,0.0021545356,0.001926783,0.013070126,0.0009751215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006186071,0.0035444633,0.0032923878,0.004392918,0.001905401,0.002052748,0.007684756,0.00727313,0.03324268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06966739,0.0010337096,0.0032661762,0.0041107023,0.0020222552,0.0024839493,0.0025034263,0.009754906,0.016502207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007500777,0.000009635097,0.00046802824,0.00024136287,0.000038250244,0.00020762617,0.000044874487,0.000030303452,0.000051758154,0.0005478825,0.9922921,0.005993216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044645788,0.000088993096,0.030648207,0.0028231542,0.0004883193,0.0034088835,0.00038168454,0.000879821,0.00080852717,0.0070146183,0.9528293,0.00018197666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04999946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050209716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04999946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034316157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049809483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11120784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324044488","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000184","title":"Phonological activation of word meanings in grade 5 readers.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Homophone; Spelling; Sentence; Phonology; Context (archaeology); Reading (process); Linguistics; Task (project management); Word (group theory); Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.0768959893789897,"score_gpt":0.371571777537635,"score_spread":0.29467578815864526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324044488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99925846,0.000071491035,0.00014659793,0.000011633787,0.0000031499465,0.0000032713303,0.00002828997,0.000008657336,0.00046852254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993104,0.00004028697,0.00019732806,0.000013609585,0.0000011952684,0.0000037972875,0.000031251948,0.0000027304343,0.00039947522],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997584,0.000053322266,0.0000368034,0.000064383064,0.0000532755,0.000033817043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998175,0.00074276706,0.0006985747,0.00009779819,0.00015220407,0.00013367274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003478777,0.00026143796,0.0001795516,0.0004764532,0.0001424214,0.0008233421,0.0001635442,0.00043570218,0.0020901773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026765715,0.00019609848,0.00012399696,0.00010788349,0.0003848176,0.00038234715,0.0003465482,0.0002721733,0.000307151],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026225075,0.0005810349,0.402906,0.00052425,0.00016285173,0.0024986677,0.01033535,0.0002047414,0.5147879,0.00060192856,0.0004484019,0.064326376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034210403,0.0015112349,0.9607713,0.000032664284,0.00007934368,0.0012668109,0.002336624,0.00031396718,0.03231171,0.0004901402,0.0008284012,0.000023545113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000962352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002108948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020901773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016401208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011138543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00699234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2324319982","doi":"10.1037/a0035583","title":"Executive control modulates cross-language lexical activation during L2 reading: Evidence from eye movements.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Centre for Research on Brain Language and Music","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Linguistics; Reading (process); Control (management); Cognate; Sentence; Cognitive psychology; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.029591559990227993,"score_gpt":0.36045382720977853,"score_spread":0.33086226721955053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2324319982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990702,0.000095660514,0.00020610302,0.000017430779,0.0000014619867,0.0000047478907,0.000042968644,0.000004641623,0.00055686996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99927944,0.000080948725,0.0002512118,0.000021085683,0.0000021682138,0.000009452071,0.000061563456,0.0000036880026,0.00029036525],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99993587,0.00001422385,0.0000036217045,0.000021841592,0.0000116859455,0.000012775809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996197,0.00014971287,0.00012172152,0.000033673212,0.000036172038,0.0000389509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016608486,0.00014663933,0.00008848305,0.00021813055,0.00010469691,0.0002271603,0.00007303275,0.0001879049,0.0010500682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010121689,0.00011566826,0.00007157979,0.00010408224,0.00023781887,0.00016311406,0.00019724386,0.00017606006,0.000110914414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014468662,0.00014536826,0.085868,0.00011824681,0.0000677723,0.0002763534,0.0013323386,0.00012829278,0.8847727,0.00013919691,0.00015687596,0.025548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023480887,0.00017028359,0.9871618,0.000004181777,0.000016022166,0.00012503598,0.00012739089,0.00022966406,0.01188311,0.00007692988,0.00017771586,0.0000043530235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002417364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006402553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002417364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015337626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010992226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0048066378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2326477932","doi":"10.1037/a0037346","title":"Strategic flexibility in computational estimation for Chinese- and Canadian-educated adults.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Vlaamse regering; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Operationalization; Flexibility (engineering); Psychology; Estimation; Computer science; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.02790176705542076,"score_gpt":0.3555306047204859,"score_spread":0.3276288376650652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2326477932","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.996768,0.00025838215,0.00030932084,0.000101557656,0.000007223055,0.000015719981,0.00011394936,0.000007604768,0.0024183053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983316,0.00011628069,0.0005682449,0.00005991242,0.0000031961108,0.0000059721856,0.00017292806,0.0000025261022,0.00073933124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911565,0.00008012178,0.00010688137,0.00014967978,0.0003738319,0.00017378763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99563015,0.0008575634,0.0016085978,0.00035541033,0.0007983112,0.00075006054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013708802,0.00048982,0.0002662696,0.0011732857,0.00088433956,0.001520769,0.00042138365,0.0004680148,0.00290363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010357486,0.00028608224,0.000409417,0.00087707205,0.0010213178,0.0008706216,0.0007771119,0.0005944496,0.0003115575],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039160688,0.00019215007,0.93899304,0.00009122111,0.0001003884,0.00031647368,0.01215431,0.00084266876,0.0036429043,0.0014762537,0.00078459457,0.041014325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044463362,0.00021726485,0.98694104,0.000049389957,0.00006353571,0.0006117285,0.004649837,0.0023589353,0.0009704156,0.0012307671,0.0027808584,0.00008178906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2673738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37767535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7326262,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018576848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025481295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53163505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327718193","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000085","title":"Property attribution in combined concepts.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Noun; Property (philosophy); Contrast (vision); Set (abstract data type); Attribution; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Replicate; Process (computing); Computer science; Mathematics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Linguistics; Statistics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02618813816969425,"score_gpt":0.3452333971176883,"score_spread":0.31904525894799407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327718193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91882616,0.00071453257,0.062735684,0.00030280178,0.0000801146,0.00012629546,0.00015358719,0.00020613853,0.01685477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864412,0.000066355424,0.012781174,0.000044891003,0.000012569663,0.000041193904,0.00008728821,0.000027902179,0.0004973784],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99045193,0.002153991,0.00044723655,0.0019261517,0.0047893086,0.00023132232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96063566,0.021500282,0.008353913,0.0050543426,0.0034168225,0.0010389874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006100895,0.0005327518,0.0003897149,0.0013873007,0.0005294033,0.0018487102,0.0010355248,0.0010575413,0.005202631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06604197,0.000478235,0.0006417625,0.00063217874,0.0022441915,0.0054348297,0.002987883,0.0011662374,0.0002831484],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029732904,0.00045237734,0.28196576,0.0017527698,0.00068811927,0.0030946387,0.030611085,0.004610431,0.17534766,0.109340355,0.0013314114,0.38783205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018550747,0.0015230592,0.51407593,0.00044705742,0.00062391453,0.010381984,0.008784105,0.0395116,0.055076107,0.35176146,0.017238388,0.00039090108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006217201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006248397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006100895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00085444044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005311615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032265007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2330292826","doi":"10.1037/a0035031","title":"The effects of numerical magnitude, size, and color saturation on perceived interval duration.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Magnitude (astronomy); Mathematics; Statistics; Duration (music); Intensity (physics); Interval (graph theory); Contrast (vision); Absolute magnitude; Physics; Optics; Combinatorics; Acoustics","score_opus":0.015660198905972478,"score_gpt":0.31908804006421415,"score_spread":0.3034278411582417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2330292826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932146,0.00027839982,0.0020989925,0.000032106836,0.000027523496,0.000028071034,0.000109204935,0.000019504654,0.0041917423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759334,0.000089204084,0.0017833138,0.000023007462,0.0000095659625,0.000026806565,0.00006439459,0.000013225411,0.00039714377],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999551,0.00011142939,0.000035520097,0.000116162424,0.00015845029,0.000027375912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882515,0.008548106,0.0017479792,0.000436341,0.0004487874,0.00056736777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083237374,0.00025056562,0.00014480548,0.00044344118,0.00012615792,0.00054789224,0.00019585651,0.00026113578,0.003135116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015499791,0.00019888765,0.00016526168,0.00023234032,0.00032124476,0.0006618261,0.00052957184,0.00033820537,0.00016753896],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070828362,0.0004383958,0.16343525,0.00050364475,0.00016917741,0.0002667941,0.0023725117,0.00077663426,0.75854313,0.001509222,0.0004091377,0.064493254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040140574,0.0009755322,0.9757599,0.000024222007,0.000057738016,0.00033414943,0.00028029302,0.0015390706,0.019745357,0.0007573017,0.0004628127,0.000023493349],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000662359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00092610327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003135116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018296053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016170516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010488033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331725338","doi":"10.1037/a0034887","title":"Base rates: Both neglected and intuitive.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":160,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Neglect; Base (topology); Social psychology; Information processing; Cognition; Salient; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.10049814131948827,"score_gpt":0.4264947180489293,"score_spread":0.32599657672944105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331725338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85652953,0.0051824627,0.07713514,0.0023673149,0.00025498625,0.00021214232,0.00043761593,0.0006186875,0.05726208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881193,0.00076975604,0.0082222605,0.00055161864,0.00009493346,0.00008986705,0.00019489894,0.000120097924,0.001837338],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931503,0.0014531168,0.00068353966,0.0008355832,0.0034980013,0.00037955563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95998144,0.01526666,0.013660086,0.005020875,0.0041287923,0.0019421164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056343325,0.0009555789,0.00051004713,0.0021878704,0.00061894074,0.0039058416,0.0011661496,0.0012647585,0.0031216182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06326468,0.0007327135,0.0004157729,0.0012406512,0.002732948,0.004889197,0.0036007173,0.0016853766,0.0005047019],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030938429,0.00064375537,0.3079011,0.0020465245,0.0005579469,0.0028994544,0.031556558,0.0027144267,0.06527218,0.10341868,0.007759716,0.47213575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033583006,0.002103409,0.52005935,0.0017188065,0.00091447716,0.021757292,0.016465833,0.018810624,0.037911393,0.29728243,0.081946634,0.00069406664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001089482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075552077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056343325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008018532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075658166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029797554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332393039","doi":"10.1037/a0031673","title":"Reading aloud: Does previous trial history modulate the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stimulus (psychology); Reading aloud; Word lists by frequency; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Cognition; Lexical decision task; Computer science; Linguistics; Reading (process); Natural language processing; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03734090504697388,"score_gpt":0.343551368593946,"score_spread":0.3062104635469721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332393039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9874895,0.00061878684,0.008249917,0.00015317918,0.00009537889,0.00012144264,0.0001644674,0.00008029234,0.0030271255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939131,0.00023760606,0.0033793135,0.00016939112,0.000043363736,0.00010605291,0.00015998857,0.00018722068,0.0018039591],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857056,0.000367257,0.00011281,0.00048252055,0.00037611296,0.00009066111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98689574,0.00869998,0.0019919637,0.0015338117,0.0005082519,0.00037023233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021802639,0.00031390032,0.0007710037,0.00033130232,0.00021134925,0.0011127377,0.0006219335,0.00044869375,0.0041035973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014382654,0.0003982596,0.00040843096,0.0003516875,0.00082354073,0.0013110121,0.0006683669,0.0006656617,0.0003948486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00767584,0.0011549414,0.10714781,0.0010458254,0.0007003955,0.0005269365,0.0050108572,0.0008020094,0.79376835,0.002131083,0.00048606715,0.07954985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014802066,0.001988148,0.94319814,0.000057785346,0.00037999553,0.0002985788,0.0003771844,0.002257378,0.046703655,0.003179034,0.0013544706,0.00005761092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014979317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016047026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041035973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000248121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031824067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013727903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333026799","doi":"10.1037/a0030906","title":"Direct evidence for a dual process model of deductive inference.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Counterexample; Inference; Statistical inference; Heuristic; Frequentist inference; Computer science; Mathematics; Algorithm; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Discrete mathematics; Bayesian inference","score_opus":0.3929391790820133,"score_gpt":0.5409938992105198,"score_spread":0.14805472012850646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333026799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4327866,0.0020409191,0.42510086,0.011956893,0.0012137932,0.0013438041,0.0026221697,0.0014245581,0.12151034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93471146,0.00034610997,0.056495246,0.0023802437,0.00021006909,0.00066867063,0.001374818,0.00019381913,0.003619677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98686904,0.0037972513,0.0010432905,0.004192583,0.003600243,0.00049763493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8353581,0.110782206,0.01290991,0.02906035,0.007975645,0.003913861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019554153,0.0011934577,0.0013292935,0.001941037,0.00068914634,0.0032810536,0.0046110842,0.004023879,0.030586373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11627222,0.0014635148,0.0021730887,0.0009156544,0.0036342733,0.0111536225,0.0052626594,0.0044772597,0.0036581757],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020080669,0.0102425935,0.11144159,0.008174514,0.003208134,0.0025674803,0.0103214905,0.021252383,0.058387958,0.51967967,0.012674829,0.22196862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004732408,0.003775351,0.08161808,0.00047114116,0.00093637046,0.005406149,0.00088734296,0.18048443,0.014912188,0.68726176,0.0190789,0.000435853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011948313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070767704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030586373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012300314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010316633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2365553918","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000130","title":"Sensitivity to morphological composition in spoken word recognition: Evidence from grammatical and lexical identification tasks.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Mental lexicon; Morpheme; Suffix; Lexicon; Noun; Computer science; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Identification (biology); Nominalization; Artificial intelligence; Word formation; Word (group theory); Semantics (computer science); Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.09569452720836036,"score_gpt":0.3859327441781255,"score_spread":0.29023821696976515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2365553918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975998,0.00019173328,0.00053803914,0.000033979864,0.000009782367,0.00001529679,0.00008980644,0.00001174072,0.0015100046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998128,0.00014699987,0.0008654246,0.00016513823,0.000010742485,0.00003650462,0.0001774825,0.00002391959,0.00044587065],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983285,0.00038926548,0.00017206946,0.0005348156,0.00048403032,0.00009134253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775704,0.012516617,0.005791736,0.0018290618,0.0013616214,0.00093055656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001868109,0.00030167866,0.00034755317,0.001027154,0.00019103635,0.0010753261,0.00038122176,0.00081222726,0.0020867446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01959612,0.000656619,0.00018342167,0.00038742385,0.0011980998,0.0010952887,0.0014127924,0.0006127937,0.0005133878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034206968,0.0010673612,0.2836364,0.0005153665,0.00036767154,0.000622356,0.0069561247,0.00028094754,0.6410677,0.00048573018,0.00047659865,0.061103012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052654,0.00064396544,0.9797442,0.000026753056,0.0000616068,0.0010397278,0.00075392483,0.00035903347,0.016163573,0.0006636089,0.00045591645,0.000035055993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091855845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010096802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020867446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014392873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014405284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009879649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2384563445","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000291","title":"Logical reasoning versus information processing in the dual-strategy model of reasoning.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Counterexample; Premise; Psychology of reasoning; Probabilistic logic; Modus ponens; Inference; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Statistical model; Statistical inference; Natural language processing; Cognitive science; Psychology; Theoretical computer science; Model-based reasoning; Mathematics; Epistemology; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Statistics","score_opus":0.05126786436202161,"score_gpt":0.3370305388411824,"score_spread":0.28576267447916076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2384563445","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23657773,0.012957974,0.44916144,0.04828332,0.0005859942,0.0004067581,0.00070102967,0.0004716866,0.2508541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366002,0.0025009501,0.0519383,0.002370527,0.00020434722,0.00025196723,0.00030944624,0.00005432041,0.005770041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967656,0.001523022,0.00017797892,0.00062733295,0.0006823222,0.00022376611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905195,0.006711554,0.0010123735,0.0008588043,0.00036584702,0.00053188665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005417223,0.00070799515,0.00072213274,0.0027706982,0.00067249994,0.0071007204,0.002418966,0.0034937765,0.008442405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01364071,0.0005241058,0.0014716604,0.0017500818,0.0101699885,0.01991425,0.0028362873,0.00320762,0.0011667318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016736082,0.00010237706,0.0027231798,0.00025755982,0.00005788658,0.00018297529,0.0022775137,0.0014382366,0.0007552462,0.9711076,0.00092008384,0.02000999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003549775,0.000038170354,0.0014840089,0.000053977026,0.000023816927,0.00026288282,0.00031622476,0.01042656,0.00019788915,0.9853334,0.0018140974,0.000013594233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017525478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012876047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008442405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002613817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014464642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02864939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2407820352","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000214","title":"The d-Prime directive: Assessing costs and benefits in recognition by dissociating mixed-list false alarm rates.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Computer science; Subject (documents); False alarm; Reading (process); Comparability; Think aloud protocol; Constant false alarm rate; Natural language processing; Speech recognition; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Social psychology; Mathematics; Human–computer interaction","score_opus":0.042500339747512446,"score_gpt":0.35388023678128183,"score_spread":0.3113798970337694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2407820352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7195845,0.0016936243,0.25540155,0.0011522555,0.0009583823,0.004908918,0.0017188683,0.001969347,0.012612467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6430708,0.00055907166,0.32693407,0.0025318393,0.0001830146,0.01741259,0.0009241616,0.0008482298,0.0075361864],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98452395,0.0077416785,0.0016409997,0.0025789344,0.0032967324,0.00021760612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95608765,0.03196577,0.0055152336,0.003513156,0.0022472513,0.0006709716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013516474,0.0012297203,0.0010012334,0.0007888487,0.0004434724,0.0011640814,0.001250531,0.002272095,0.003140587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046189833,0.00091886,0.0007440768,0.00075507024,0.0010766053,0.0017340133,0.001367292,0.0027710528,0.00084738206],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.051388744,0.008916341,0.0770198,0.005795098,0.0019889856,0.0007962573,0.004942601,0.0015949047,0.4799625,0.014452441,0.01224903,0.34089318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004102638,0.06706687,0.42100284,0.00040653168,0.0018044792,0.0038028802,0.0009189105,0.018670885,0.43831754,0.01979964,0.023475207,0.00063155073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042822066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008340004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013516474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004728711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068432395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07148278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416363428","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000167","title":"The spatial scaffold: The effects of spatial context on memory for events.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory and Neural Mechanisms","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Spatial contextual awareness; Context (archaeology); Recall; Cognitive psychology; Episodic memory; Psychology; Encoding (memory); Context effect; Spatial ability; Event (particle physics); Spatial analysis; Context-dependent memory; Cognition; Computer science; Neuroscience; Free recall; Word (group theory); Artificial intelligence; History; Linguistics; Geography","score_opus":0.0753428862751519,"score_gpt":0.3628889088477914,"score_spread":0.2875460225726395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2416363428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99005705,0.0010920845,0.003254365,0.00014599599,0.0000686283,0.00006496915,0.0001658479,0.00006394244,0.0050871694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955972,0.00038125296,0.002995013,0.000071751616,0.000022547652,0.00007146984,0.00013234372,0.000026825122,0.00070161314],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994948,0.0001473183,0.00005158532,0.00014152795,0.00012242596,0.000042268868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940253,0.0034111955,0.0010997059,0.0008775441,0.00020467152,0.0003816483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082909333,0.00039471465,0.00033289043,0.00034321932,0.00024846094,0.0008611128,0.00069708016,0.0005911895,0.0038763224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011616448,0.00031315096,0.00026876788,0.00021447813,0.00067669584,0.0022197298,0.001448676,0.0005882986,0.00029975863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016442891,0.0012897606,0.033280134,0.0019236575,0.00035491664,0.0009621815,0.0063528847,0.0012017133,0.7738919,0.0040670116,0.0013278401,0.158905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001105914,0.02360773,0.635001,0.0007138278,0.0015689647,0.0038741105,0.0046000257,0.008520317,0.27487788,0.029575838,0.01623311,0.00032131444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006241079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010203084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038763224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022039675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032101394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0129675865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2427123482","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000258","title":"Effects of morphology and semantic transparency on typing latencies in english compound and pseudocompound words.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Text Readability and Simplification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morpheme; Transparency (behavior); Natural language processing; Computer science; Opacity; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.018493676804162185,"score_gpt":0.28391415519497915,"score_spread":0.26542047839081695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2427123482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972857,0.00011831397,0.0011390531,0.000027523924,0.000013344384,0.000025502364,0.00012005949,0.00003507388,0.0012354698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980819,0.00007812508,0.001070129,0.000027422235,0.000009685847,0.000040142044,0.00015201059,0.00005112493,0.0004894861],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847454,0.0004329071,0.00023283625,0.000299173,0.0004797595,0.00008071161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90164095,0.074757114,0.017827164,0.0024085832,0.0020318062,0.0013343082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018608945,0.00043359783,0.00023655314,0.00061201135,0.00016071677,0.0011120315,0.0003231816,0.0004660488,0.0034105158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06603984,0.00036002073,0.00019043022,0.00040604765,0.00064523437,0.001530592,0.0006751865,0.0006132348,0.00047389543],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01619062,0.0011651432,0.21687531,0.00072222756,0.0001940245,0.0016537551,0.009335442,0.0010389782,0.6570946,0.00068676425,0.00049368944,0.09454936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014797878,0.0024692877,0.9558942,0.000059836802,0.00010495598,0.001270042,0.0011505898,0.0019592694,0.035278223,0.0010668009,0.0005443656,0.0000544773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065789785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008762201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034105158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001898772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023418135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011409342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460879196","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000239","title":"Superior cognitive mapping through single landmark-related learning than through boundary-related learning.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Landmark; Cognitive map; Boundary (topology); Cognition; Metric (unit); Spatial learning; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Mathematics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03174501023125341,"score_gpt":0.30587451174967906,"score_spread":0.27412950151842563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460879196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93089145,0.0005701932,0.014465841,0.0007394914,0.00019157238,0.0001139569,0.00036034163,0.00049758045,0.052169666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9845509,0.00022029484,0.009717918,0.00015387023,0.000022423637,0.00004562371,0.00020729785,0.000062961386,0.005018724],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993705,0.00009139725,0.00005001626,0.00024972405,0.00017479599,0.00006359354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628556,0.0012082994,0.000783037,0.0010498759,0.00024273971,0.00043050916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014433202,0.00037873015,0.0003993248,0.0004119612,0.00018195428,0.0015719194,0.0005876463,0.000718321,0.01886392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009384284,0.00013709633,0.00027075678,0.00029697633,0.0008693956,0.0038906625,0.0012006126,0.0008589505,0.0015938962],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042707594,0.0018840088,0.038375698,0.0018169901,0.00043148486,0.0005019064,0.0018475493,0.0047911187,0.2935431,0.04352206,0.008403872,0.6006115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014436825,0.016158974,0.32764098,0.00064263877,0.0010867323,0.0037427675,0.0018569232,0.043091405,0.24467546,0.3105284,0.048869625,0.00026235267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005298422,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060391164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01886392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002812291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005692792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06310606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2462403954","doi":"10.1037/a0040332","title":"Distinct ERP signatures of word frequency, phrase frequency, and prototypicality in speech production.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Phrase; Computer science; Word lists by frequency; Speech recognition; Word (group theory); Contrast (vision); Natural language processing; Speech production; Production (economics); Artificial intelligence; Language production; Psychology; Linguistics; Cognition; Sentence","score_opus":0.02355904743768742,"score_gpt":0.3388507897932512,"score_spread":0.31529174235556373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2462403954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98904943,0.0005285138,0.004027708,0.00006602666,0.00002256878,0.000046168036,0.00034514166,0.000053066255,0.0058615184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966628,0.00019461686,0.0018625943,0.000045225897,0.000019797624,0.000049238723,0.00025017557,0.000036153124,0.00087935955],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979717,0.00004012247,0.000014390041,0.00007227798,0.000059591104,0.00001649235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99564964,0.0030584761,0.00072191353,0.00020754243,0.00018586073,0.00017655522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005288868,0.0002188063,0.00019797664,0.000525387,0.000080122,0.00039920112,0.00017604999,0.00030870072,0.002950128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006100976,0.00019256798,0.00013875688,0.0004069044,0.00051764457,0.00049848144,0.00056765863,0.00043379152,0.00030437234],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020333005,0.00022723974,0.09880326,0.00073093135,0.00009547923,0.0007722029,0.0026492875,0.0002748757,0.7442032,0.0016604814,0.0005763765,0.14797336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002135156,0.00023823419,0.99107015,0.000023607396,0.000029918889,0.00061189407,0.00023947474,0.0005048524,0.005952568,0.00090140966,0.00039531046,0.0000112341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027396317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056385214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002950128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000109258355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012274561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009869158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2473710429","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000223","title":"Individual differences in incorrect responding and the ability to discriminate the source of the products of retrieval.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Constant false alarm rate; Cognitive psychology; Episodic memory; Response bias; Semantic memory; Spurious relationship; Cognition; False memory; False alarm; Memory errors; False positive paradox; Recall; Computer science; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning","score_opus":0.052617015129937245,"score_gpt":0.3270678802937384,"score_spread":0.2744508651638011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2473710429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99390584,0.0003735482,0.0011124917,0.00008062753,0.000028712135,0.000031340016,0.0005071593,0.000047993064,0.003912341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99746823,0.00018052841,0.000686706,0.000062749416,0.000014808206,0.000026757716,0.00044942775,0.000020040203,0.0010905925],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980483,0.000638611,0.00029078432,0.00038730132,0.0005636084,0.00007145139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624842,0.01798939,0.012658168,0.005005421,0.0010162871,0.00084647274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025287347,0.00029555926,0.00033898733,0.0010609804,0.0001104178,0.00051888207,0.00040940937,0.0005434417,0.0029090592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028780987,0.00018082971,0.00022448569,0.000630735,0.0006084638,0.0005551081,0.0005352474,0.000703257,0.0005511325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001362319,0.0006419001,0.9189418,0.00013476056,0.00042914186,0.00026367605,0.0009845546,0.0003893579,0.018422538,0.000582909,0.0007393701,0.0571076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038844464,0.0002727184,0.9969325,0.0000066256375,0.000031639855,0.00045344693,0.000058821137,0.00024849415,0.0014008288,0.00038628248,0.0001964135,0.00000825116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006306121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007659332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029090592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019963716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012264171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013373435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474876696","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000132","title":"When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compound words.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Spelling; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Reading (process); Language production; Comprehension; Lexicon; Linguistics; Contrast (vision); Mental lexicon; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Communication; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04118221750013793,"score_gpt":0.3699077199838891,"score_spread":0.32872550248375115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474876696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992099,0.0000688155,0.0003236655,0.000013670952,0.00000194277,0.00000300368,0.000027024407,0.0000063793264,0.00034571023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955815,0.000030129695,0.00018201071,0.000010133007,0.0000016195595,0.0000034265547,0.000031924523,0.000004993344,0.0001775166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928457,0.00018387157,0.00006804215,0.00025258123,0.00014876405,0.000062239465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934864,0.0037058431,0.0015676403,0.00061374926,0.00031211518,0.00031424078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007814219,0.00015687193,0.00021516884,0.0005242599,0.00015320377,0.00086679455,0.0002003238,0.000398349,0.00083098724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00894907,0.00022466728,0.00015164747,0.0003077419,0.0004670989,0.00065769564,0.0006677824,0.00029102634,0.00018450341],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007812921,0.00019068504,0.8348308,0.00009569227,0.00028268335,0.00056182017,0.013213758,0.0005703289,0.10406244,0.0001959185,0.0002230231,0.044991564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026455366,0.00025433776,0.99435836,0.000004395103,0.00002610904,0.0004948857,0.0012317428,0.00039099282,0.002712914,0.00020075803,0.000304647,0.000018274079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007068299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015150252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00086679455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011153561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010422864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004132569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522350522","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000330","title":"Attentional capture by deviant sounds: A noncontingent form of auditory distraction?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Distraction; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognition; Mismatch negativity; Task (project management); Electroencephalography","score_opus":0.029176949827405835,"score_gpt":0.32607732663248307,"score_spread":0.29690037680507725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522350522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99032414,0.00077901955,0.00570881,0.00008041654,0.00003281495,0.000056387635,0.000038793663,0.000065739565,0.0029139875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974305,0.00021435281,0.0018117067,0.00013353764,0.000026678787,0.000029457731,0.000040038412,0.0000173297,0.0002964027],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994394,0.000121876335,0.000056615147,0.000112717935,0.00023286107,0.000036568934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99621093,0.002055466,0.0006826064,0.0007607742,0.00013137348,0.0001588737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078023144,0.00024887754,0.00028451605,0.00026259886,0.00011379735,0.00039258276,0.00047669464,0.00045286375,0.0010293737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054786587,0.00014216074,0.00022137439,0.00016194371,0.00069040235,0.00041033677,0.0006205077,0.0004118626,0.00014085099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016630264,0.00043646857,0.046022948,0.00051805686,0.00015862814,0.0010424774,0.00095452945,0.0003947285,0.86386395,0.0020060942,0.00025857982,0.082680576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018670117,0.0038993908,0.8201612,0.00015629875,0.0002212052,0.0055641085,0.00061619526,0.003920677,0.15828632,0.004059273,0.0028826601,0.00004603557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026572566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005071435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0010293737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016378173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018761255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0041262507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522776060","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000301","title":"Not all order memory is equal: Test demands reveal dissociations in memory for sequence information.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Encoding (memory); Episodic memory; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Association (psychology); Computer science; Memory errors; Sequence (biology); Dissociation (chemistry); Cognition; Recall; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.0753477635381666,"score_gpt":0.3760124614759946,"score_spread":0.300664697937828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522776060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835321,0.00073106785,0.0032054158,0.0005602446,0.000046895846,0.00012385953,0.000874602,0.00008242652,0.010843367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99137056,0.00033049556,0.0035034756,0.0006148885,0.00003353588,0.0002822915,0.0020491513,0.00009671482,0.0017189337],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959422,0.000734826,0.00049877755,0.0009831014,0.0016590075,0.00018213068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9257932,0.04742564,0.009644745,0.013260336,0.0015466198,0.0023295141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006806542,0.0007567353,0.0007711473,0.0011031013,0.000488666,0.0024597861,0.0024953696,0.0015705827,0.0073061762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057691887,0.00062197255,0.00042112963,0.0011790983,0.0020256513,0.0057234555,0.002860545,0.0017516738,0.0016664783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015472829,0.005540865,0.46303353,0.0025488804,0.0008399631,0.003019543,0.012246476,0.0015717408,0.17044312,0.015231085,0.0074547557,0.30259722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029943036,0.0047140066,0.9336717,0.000263888,0.00014352666,0.0029948822,0.0020531118,0.0027888361,0.025538493,0.02108465,0.006301916,0.00014561875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011324423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002002443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073061762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054585875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005937633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035996854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525084367","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000324","title":"Piloting systems reset path integration systems during position estimation.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Landmark; Path integration; Reset (finance); Computer vision; Position (finance); Path (computing); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Point (geometry); Psychology; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.015691977847905277,"score_gpt":0.2835527279892645,"score_spread":0.26786075014135924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525084367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94210804,0.0011067366,0.047577836,0.00019789478,0.00013862675,0.00012139237,0.00023659124,0.00043048206,0.008082524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858986,0.00017688639,0.012897473,0.000095246665,0.000012482449,0.000037343692,0.00018082088,0.000048653266,0.0006525333],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993149,0.000107137945,0.000059242793,0.0002653311,0.00017606809,0.00007740376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734735,0.0006435947,0.00087848067,0.0005214303,0.00045282327,0.0001562653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087773753,0.00051996316,0.00032715703,0.00046415417,0.00034195275,0.0012722543,0.0004850541,0.0007695118,0.0028226476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011862781,0.00045448937,0.00022523523,0.00033636915,0.0007490912,0.0016479479,0.0011017428,0.0007149582,0.00044385114],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001348998,0.00018722813,0.103362575,0.0007838422,0.0002038548,0.00075776933,0.0077648065,0.0018849882,0.5574022,0.005087973,0.0021108994,0.31910488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012000538,0.0015294602,0.8930743,0.00023614476,0.00025505156,0.0015219045,0.0034700742,0.012603893,0.06821097,0.011207178,0.007588036,0.00018300136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023221923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016968974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028226476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003114105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005014892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009442687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525737602","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000316","title":"The effect of semantic transparency on the processing of morphologically derived words: Evidence from decision latencies and event-related potentials.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Computer science; Priming (agriculture); Natural language processing; Transparency (behavior); Task (project management); Semantic memory; Artificial intelligence; Complex event processing; Repetition priming; Cognitive psychology; Event-related potential; Psychology; Process (computing); Electroencephalography; Cognition","score_opus":0.02399853396459767,"score_gpt":0.3319790468092413,"score_spread":0.3079805128446436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525737602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99611145,0.00021012053,0.0019481359,0.00006946653,0.000009233205,0.000022297665,0.00014181608,0.000025070034,0.001462519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974394,0.0001911794,0.0018739308,0.000053779233,0.000006890526,0.00003378149,0.00012763051,0.000022169743,0.00025124592],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993073,0.00017848976,0.00006118903,0.00013758634,0.0002751812,0.00004024852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9761613,0.01598185,0.0060725836,0.00079714094,0.00051376224,0.00047333172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008754414,0.00025478672,0.00016455598,0.0003193975,0.00008809426,0.0005136409,0.00026583206,0.0003785605,0.0018074294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020513756,0.00029923924,0.000113550755,0.00026026013,0.00077147916,0.000853468,0.0007059554,0.00061416806,0.00021332827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046898862,0.00035028576,0.04970716,0.0005295754,0.00006985001,0.0006979668,0.001655955,0.00031331094,0.88824123,0.0012535403,0.00027935635,0.052211735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012903106,0.0011142405,0.90650433,0.000041068033,0.00006713722,0.0013921347,0.00037373728,0.0011457467,0.085113615,0.0033846365,0.00070324243,0.00003106115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047345835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053821824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018074294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001560008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024081915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0060464144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562706198","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000344","title":"Reading aloud: On the determinants of the joint effects of stimulus quality and word frequency.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Word lists by frequency; Orthography; Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Phonology; Read aloud; Reading aloud; Word recognition; Cognitive psychology; Speech recognition; Communication; Linguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.04403857902550265,"score_gpt":0.3667425312691279,"score_spread":0.32270395224362525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562706198","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934016,0.00019229364,0.0039175972,0.000078378536,0.000020837066,0.00006045198,0.00010602088,0.000056338526,0.0021664724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443346,0.000088547495,0.0041100886,0.00008156288,0.000013235926,0.00006451183,0.00014237917,0.00010013929,0.0009660486],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987552,0.00036486037,0.0000730362,0.00039879337,0.0003363971,0.00007180527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980316,0.014188256,0.0029381805,0.0009429183,0.0008531524,0.0007615226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015880194,0.00044261874,0.0004259731,0.0003774556,0.00017940922,0.0013154254,0.00035727333,0.00053639704,0.003202573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022755159,0.00046621903,0.00028712442,0.0003154835,0.00048729268,0.0016000058,0.000705133,0.00068582135,0.00041912237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006008967,0.0009317149,0.07490094,0.000543358,0.0002512458,0.00043092683,0.004126007,0.00074859505,0.8577265,0.0010963903,0.0003404657,0.052894898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023402869,0.0021321941,0.9237792,0.000036586986,0.00021884925,0.00038111646,0.0006695427,0.005226365,0.064027086,0.0026052298,0.0006196346,0.000070141214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001564791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018283415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003202573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003436389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029924323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0107136965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2571947943","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000358","title":"Photos that increase feelings of learning promote positive evaluations.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"New Zealand Government","keywords":"Feeling; PsycINFO; Context (archaeology); Noun; Psychology; Wine; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Art; Visual arts; MEDLINE; History","score_opus":0.06795686765088468,"score_gpt":0.42285970946994206,"score_spread":0.3549028418190574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2571947943","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503546,0.0010317204,0.002123647,0.00079351757,0.0003166549,0.0001937828,0.00014909213,0.00026912676,0.04476786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98731935,0.00056032446,0.004805763,0.00044043583,0.00009675045,0.00014995353,0.00007776253,0.000053583866,0.006496098],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959177,0.00014135797,0.000023073282,0.000054002765,0.00014677373,0.00004299042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967789,0.0019808903,0.0005448129,0.00019634372,0.00018380045,0.00031522362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006529917,0.0004637659,0.00017934696,0.00040232582,0.00032944558,0.00092823274,0.00015768716,0.0006310188,0.013261702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005440457,0.00013558981,0.00027988444,0.00018887667,0.00054967275,0.0011256019,0.00076921086,0.0006653883,0.00092662935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005769903,0.015196466,0.04219213,0.0071653347,0.0005021392,0.00089337415,0.020405998,0.0007505537,0.28009552,0.011400796,0.031465694,0.5841621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018166538,0.027068269,0.69066566,0.001549971,0.0016721408,0.0023641055,0.022504421,0.0021698966,0.14356633,0.02066178,0.085587025,0.00037380916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009809698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002480555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013261702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001849203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009858686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04436481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2579987522","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000365","title":"Alternating-script priming in Japanese: Are Katakana and Hiragana characters interchangeable?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Kana; Kanji; Repetition (rhetorical device); Repetition priming; Linguistics; Priming (agriculture); Word (group theory); Psychology; Lexical access; Computer science; Communication; Lexical decision task; Chinese characters; Artificial intelligence; Cognition","score_opus":0.05412143978324716,"score_gpt":0.3707541469032341,"score_spread":0.3166327071199869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2579987522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99254674,0.00052924233,0.0009790726,0.00015764413,0.000023690123,0.000025697733,0.00004163063,0.000024165412,0.005672088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968669,0.00030688263,0.0014447242,0.00014016921,0.000013542595,0.000051124774,0.000058594498,0.000018785204,0.0010993171],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960643,0.00013353574,0.000034571043,0.0001394396,0.000053410702,0.00003266098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977913,0.0012343508,0.0005392613,0.00019171213,0.00008661703,0.0001567433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007571161,0.0002716662,0.00031532868,0.00019748833,0.00025225984,0.0006030265,0.0004275697,0.000586141,0.0057829297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005434361,0.00025344038,0.00016457133,0.00021879126,0.0009673619,0.0015149782,0.00070618343,0.0005391113,0.00050023146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0096135475,0.0015125963,0.068674855,0.0027642609,0.00012964137,0.002758161,0.015925925,0.0003760938,0.6296526,0.013592646,0.0017579655,0.25324175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005179536,0.0043945266,0.8541898,0.00042116258,0.00046391928,0.0047975327,0.006696854,0.0031412556,0.08965587,0.027838591,0.007769153,0.0001133032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022554111,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024380104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057829297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029368768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003775751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01934582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2588156857","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000372","title":"Rule-based reasoning is fast and belief-based reasoning can be slow: Challenging current explanations of belief-bias and base-rate neglect.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Belief revision; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Neglect; Cognitive psychology; Analytic reasoning; Psychology; Psychology of reasoning; Dual (grammatical number); Verbal reasoning; Base (topology); False belief; Process (computing); Knowledge base; Reasoning system; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Mathematics; Theory of mind","score_opus":0.15385164640687782,"score_gpt":0.4257448882145097,"score_spread":0.27189324180763186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2588156857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88662785,0.013291783,0.047421273,0.019555323,0.000403643,0.0001044881,0.000649511,0.00036623777,0.031579886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98585874,0.0020258168,0.00848766,0.001623965,0.00021006611,0.0000729099,0.00022542522,0.000081435195,0.0014139998],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983563,0.0004287031,0.00018267543,0.0005140526,0.00041213326,0.000106101885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9283726,0.05143243,0.011882482,0.0059348047,0.0013924346,0.0009852346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061903344,0.00029511465,0.00065550295,0.00088048965,0.00043374934,0.0036082526,0.0012693651,0.001498321,0.010323231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08334513,0.00033518265,0.00039243326,0.0011512915,0.0028139385,0.009022982,0.001660106,0.0024674477,0.0008781429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020426298,0.00048746724,0.19984359,0.0023070814,0.00042290887,0.0011604446,0.014320265,0.0026819974,0.0117582735,0.23782186,0.010719997,0.5164334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019551227,0.00043746445,0.29120648,0.00070610654,0.0002779418,0.0026616952,0.005506537,0.02458273,0.0030163322,0.6611432,0.010089548,0.00017643852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021462985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002026847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010323231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009335206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007233377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034534633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2592029863","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000387","title":"Accessibility limits recall from visual working memory.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Digital Accessibility for Disabilities","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Working memory; Recall; Encoding (memory); Object (grammar); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cued speech; Psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.08171335900988569,"score_gpt":0.43025584206136924,"score_spread":0.34854248305148355,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2592029863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8033022,0.007774415,0.16506186,0.0011537763,0.00021310155,0.00020205375,0.00072306354,0.0009470698,0.02062244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98562485,0.0015398557,0.00969162,0.00022407985,0.00006074284,0.00007929359,0.0003993503,0.000114696595,0.0022654368],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749327,0.00048723232,0.0003020032,0.0005428955,0.0010493146,0.00012529205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672775,0.019150779,0.0045120837,0.0071854293,0.001223785,0.00065030844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003294941,0.0006179862,0.00074919045,0.0007639093,0.00035138466,0.0025704766,0.0015978805,0.001004972,0.004980537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037779905,0.00043944,0.0006258064,0.0005832248,0.0014680785,0.005717484,0.0033939292,0.0016011236,0.00096990995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002504628,0.0005802847,0.07209606,0.0025879226,0.0008925604,0.0016238991,0.0046018898,0.017737329,0.2412047,0.057244796,0.004127575,0.5947984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026003426,0.0031256797,0.22057928,0.0012872278,0.0009806012,0.010793521,0.0022769477,0.06464094,0.29480168,0.35835364,0.04248569,0.00041483308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018231624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013618765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004980537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086285686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062330393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017425537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597238469","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000390","title":"Distinguishing discrete and gradient category structure in language: Insights from verb-particle constructions.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Verb; Representation (politics); Cline (biology); Computer science; Natural language processing; Consistency (knowledge bases); Linguistics; Component (thermodynamics); Mental representation; Psychology; Class (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognition","score_opus":0.02515799533211804,"score_gpt":0.3365469933070269,"score_spread":0.3113889979749089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597238469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432209,0.00037793288,0.045635868,0.0005335737,0.0000136003355,0.00003139648,0.00019993668,0.00012582412,0.009860944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98563516,0.00015474026,0.013075618,0.000040301824,0.0000041326207,0.000019617426,0.00010877332,0.00003521368,0.00092634675],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997111,0.00009930821,0.000019460529,0.00008057431,0.000070710106,0.000018948134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957327,0.0026603066,0.0007356801,0.0005802548,0.00017289752,0.00011802939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008561604,0.00016780884,0.00017130819,0.0009262564,0.00019277722,0.0014850539,0.00052243716,0.0003961367,0.0019660373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01060328,0.00014627192,0.0001880205,0.00078134297,0.001574691,0.002567151,0.0009833955,0.0008909701,0.00023255064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011429873,0.00034340125,0.1449327,0.00066877255,0.00009615746,0.0014770349,0.029316109,0.004989623,0.13241978,0.12003512,0.0015080037,0.5630704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004426442,0.00054169574,0.6012079,0.00019368286,0.00010733982,0.003758649,0.01301571,0.048700165,0.042627446,0.27986306,0.009852297,0.00008785754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016452436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034422774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019660373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043903154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003361393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006577015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606225550","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000398","title":"Long-term memory biases auditory spatial attention.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Multisensory perception and integration","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"CLIPS; Recall; Context (archaeology); Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Task (project management); Affect (linguistics); Long-term memory; Cognition; Speech recognition; Audiology; Computer science; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.08722016609572916,"score_gpt":0.4190309724217733,"score_spread":0.3318108063260441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606225550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99614197,0.00050580024,0.0018639846,0.00007327164,0.000024368543,0.000009692646,0.00003483273,0.000030457077,0.0013156285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981029,0.00017083382,0.0005855816,0.0000791988,0.0000150708065,0.0000105834515,0.00005361149,0.000008731743,0.00097345473],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998235,0.000027124428,0.00001304949,0.00005412372,0.000055212222,0.000027065926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908507,0.00025375187,0.00026522178,0.0001335361,0.000115580304,0.00014686758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041665137,0.00024244263,0.00015948662,0.00013609654,0.00011962777,0.00056474603,0.00033915724,0.00036472426,0.0018740017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017757794,0.00013511383,0.00011337019,0.00006022554,0.00035927395,0.000382753,0.0005512604,0.00033725827,0.00030935835],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009779438,0.00016537236,0.021821842,0.00012205089,0.000047373916,0.00015582702,0.00021580039,0.00015001654,0.94453067,0.0002602196,0.00020274987,0.031350188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000999419,0.0030808738,0.6919989,0.000049334187,0.00013994206,0.0008469847,0.0004083377,0.0024529018,0.29570785,0.002499787,0.0026756823,0.000039477887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009899772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012068317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018740017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001839592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001799434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006269157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2607583961","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000411","title":"Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; McMaster University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Word recognition; Morpheme; Linguistics; Psychology; Meaning (existential); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Natural language processing; Reading (process); Cognition","score_opus":0.07103946573693587,"score_gpt":0.3944294300345751,"score_spread":0.3233899642976392,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2607583961","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45748937,0.0007211284,0.52958643,0.00022847856,0.00014663753,0.00010647931,0.0021788492,0.0014257091,0.008116952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9262228,0.00016927658,0.06739259,0.000049610422,0.000047758815,0.00009700298,0.0017737065,0.00034454954,0.0039027017],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99980456,0.00003205242,0.000016175265,0.00008642549,0.000036493402,0.000024358023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979412,0.0009735765,0.00028186323,0.00042522064,0.00021243327,0.0001656783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011667224,0.00017523322,0.00016107052,0.001036721,0.00021151335,0.0006639849,0.0003213486,0.00028820665,0.009204106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006848054,0.0001427571,0.00046509737,0.0008328477,0.00040820692,0.0009889798,0.0006421461,0.0006086343,0.0016752054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002389881,0.00017525026,0.04367711,0.00029633293,0.0001649036,0.00024214257,0.00067628466,0.008434501,0.20712627,0.056396533,0.0063996343,0.6740212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014984795,0.00047176966,0.48259115,0.000076109776,0.00018779736,0.0013127527,0.0002763039,0.2965229,0.07008988,0.13235497,0.015834043,0.00013258688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016250188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002161531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009204106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024996168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041083855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030790865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614764181","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000416","title":"Cue integration in spatial search for jointly learned landmarks but not for separately learned landmarks.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Landmark; Psychology; Variance (accounting); Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Baseline (sea); Pattern recognition (psychology); Computer science","score_opus":0.07174484247047888,"score_gpt":0.3832719810631156,"score_spread":0.3115271385926367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614764181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98808974,0.0007333029,0.0088960845,0.00009516638,0.000020934309,0.000022110087,0.00003663376,0.0000613589,0.00204473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907273,0.00019664665,0.007937938,0.00007055851,0.000014655444,0.000028360319,0.00006591626,0.000033399323,0.0009252633],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938285,0.00008217115,0.000038357834,0.0002212555,0.0002053888,0.00007000095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624497,0.0019221671,0.0010380169,0.00036194827,0.0001825175,0.00025032146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009831402,0.0005536534,0.0006068092,0.0004961471,0.00019980702,0.001036216,0.0004940597,0.0007193468,0.0020764046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012181623,0.00046843657,0.00036589548,0.00042974335,0.00068522483,0.0014825319,0.0013773633,0.0007834668,0.00018797925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0075960667,0.0010936406,0.097426094,0.0010859995,0.00068467105,0.00056094636,0.0034167815,0.014542424,0.36549377,0.0072006476,0.0021417325,0.49875724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079661555,0.006964927,0.76457864,0.00019156864,0.001286491,0.001863592,0.0010313643,0.09801514,0.081928544,0.036839254,0.006260455,0.00024341253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017428161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026904948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020764046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042547777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006194988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069463253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621499279","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000455","title":"Exploring the self-ownership effect: Separating stimulus and response biases.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Categorization; Cognitive psychology; Stimulus (psychology); PsycINFO; Psychology; Perception; Prioritization; Object (grammar); Information processing; Task (project management); Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Business; Economics; Political science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.09530499901207543,"score_gpt":0.3885107134879918,"score_spread":0.29320571447591637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621499279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94606,0.00048317958,0.047472123,0.0002898183,0.000026139876,0.0002156612,0.00024472317,0.00011922841,0.005089012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985678,0.0001295329,0.013182986,0.00009248351,0.00001414141,0.00009411128,0.00012294481,0.000038233225,0.00064750796],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986046,0.0005294449,0.00009976773,0.0003381657,0.00036044317,0.00006763174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967036,0.025402045,0.0038325053,0.0025766075,0.00063730543,0.00051563437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052538626,0.0002691492,0.00044850027,0.00062244764,0.00021221432,0.0010264267,0.00056828087,0.00065435254,0.003348615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037593555,0.00026212557,0.0004264566,0.0004290213,0.0012789906,0.003061712,0.0016570315,0.00076482166,0.00027334248],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057922783,0.0010472705,0.18098299,0.0017642301,0.00042431627,0.000365339,0.0041095857,0.0031977994,0.4446036,0.02164857,0.0008071836,0.3352569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002993298,0.0033922233,0.66791564,0.00017914483,0.0004395271,0.0013120736,0.0011913339,0.10915091,0.15572712,0.057278726,0.0029888556,0.00012512004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082378916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012778577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052538626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057165936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049485744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02778542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2736963431","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000478","title":"Cue interaction between buildings and street configurations during reorientation in familiar and unfamiliar outdoor environments.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Sensory cue; Competition (biology); Cognitive psychology; Intersection (aeronautics); Preference; Test (biology); Social psychology; Communication; Geography; Ecology; Mathematics; Cartography","score_opus":0.020253147950143824,"score_gpt":0.31457787586157987,"score_spread":0.29432472791143605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2736963431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99821717,0.00013249434,0.0007258001,0.000015374399,0.000013627538,0.000017075932,0.000032346965,0.00001929235,0.0008268224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99669915,0.00012981788,0.0022592037,0.00006069744,0.0000064240335,0.000036606547,0.00011138084,0.000021752589,0.00067492435],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996772,0.00007785151,0.00002345489,0.00011113958,0.00005492467,0.000055459222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905676,0.0003566551,0.00029093662,0.000105954605,0.00005703973,0.00013258315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036020402,0.00055519195,0.00041196766,0.00014983269,0.00015585733,0.0005626099,0.00031791255,0.00046712472,0.0016989536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003455582,0.00023963407,0.0001617141,0.0001572859,0.00036546978,0.0007020396,0.000737242,0.00038814155,0.00016575721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00880478,0.0013429957,0.052699413,0.0010964966,0.00020327492,0.00048446105,0.006384056,0.0014817456,0.840066,0.0006855607,0.0011341403,0.08561704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080130756,0.014143582,0.8722214,0.00015838322,0.00041390856,0.00075335056,0.0049615745,0.009027679,0.08611434,0.0033919564,0.007798026,0.00021439571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011057062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025324118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016989536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015278393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021323819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0056835413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741805586","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000436","title":"The acquisition of simple associations as observed in color–word contingency learning.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contingency; Word (group theory); Task (project management); Contingency management; Psychology; PsycINFO; Contrast (vision); Simple (philosophy); Cognitive psychology; Contingency table; Color term; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Machine learning; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.040971179273628804,"score_gpt":0.3798467818301021,"score_spread":0.3388756025564733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741805586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947166,0.00019609547,0.003138964,0.000061468476,0.000024448234,0.00006382172,0.000042604453,0.00008090743,0.0016750538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99265915,0.00019070023,0.0057946863,0.000085783366,0.0000121137455,0.000070981114,0.00011873617,0.000023963907,0.0010439106],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906915,0.00020411018,0.00005801179,0.00020232199,0.00039422608,0.00007219684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887177,0.005773403,0.002564522,0.0017627416,0.00047269135,0.0007090316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014400958,0.00038891664,0.0004024014,0.00026873,0.00017932283,0.0007725931,0.00057838165,0.0006692436,0.0022039192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012937749,0.00043357298,0.00020585465,0.00021338646,0.0010431653,0.0013023589,0.00077355443,0.0014364047,0.00030141932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039342134,0.002463988,0.044562425,0.0009581077,0.00017426087,0.00062368455,0.0011853199,0.0017663621,0.78193825,0.0026327784,0.0010656128,0.15869498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005746316,0.01298584,0.5827058,0.00015210379,0.0001947113,0.003956276,0.0005433598,0.018632166,0.35685554,0.018421542,0.0048343805,0.00014358562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004350264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089152844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022039192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002445954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003615368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007616043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757374339","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000442","title":"Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health; McMaster University","keywords":"Vocabulary; Transparency (behavior); Reading (process); Sentence; Semantic memory; Psychology; Compound; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Computer science","score_opus":0.0406620566630646,"score_gpt":0.3700113006446243,"score_spread":0.3293492439815597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757374339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99903417,0.000049403345,0.00053082133,0.0000057866455,0.0000024109079,0.000005464529,0.00006098992,0.000007902952,0.00030313278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992555,0.000026373873,0.00034848278,0.000005221706,0.0000023340867,0.000005413356,0.00010492409,0.000003982151,0.00024776775],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971575,0.000050463146,0.000033090593,0.00010688694,0.00007252638,0.000021145892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977818,0.0012504528,0.0004927852,0.00024076241,0.00014409647,0.00009019761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039308908,0.00012983358,0.00014515746,0.00031586754,0.00007456867,0.00026124835,0.00009291306,0.0001645199,0.0009489142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002922983,0.000100702666,0.00012668785,0.00016341156,0.00017807492,0.00021914997,0.00027858102,0.00017365007,0.00012308892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011340268,0.00013588654,0.3391007,0.00016496208,0.0002572291,0.0005300478,0.0037024852,0.000393227,0.61863863,0.000260063,0.00016170788,0.035521034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038503244,0.00016565504,0.9935708,0.000002218033,0.000015487652,0.00037040678,0.00014937724,0.000253253,0.0052022305,0.00008850697,0.00017092898,0.000007339329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037936738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009154803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0009489142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057775487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048171867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0031744242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759149419","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000453","title":"Grasp representations depend on knowledge and attention.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Object (grammar); Action (physics); GRASP; Cognitive psychology; Orientation (vector space); Evocation; Communication; Dual (grammatical number); Cognition; Cognitive science; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Linguistics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.06875978427501592,"score_gpt":0.422873386099092,"score_spread":0.35411360182407603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759149419","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8797367,0.0031060737,0.050178688,0.0006489505,0.00015680726,0.00017818513,0.0009706736,0.00046101844,0.064562865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867203,0.0010207494,0.006696758,0.00012958718,0.00004198054,0.00008134562,0.00068489637,0.000076697506,0.004547678],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963737,0.000043458276,0.000026929229,0.00011245141,0.00013925468,0.000040512747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780136,0.0010109176,0.000622536,0.00028079972,0.0001549817,0.00012936392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043020447,0.0003305108,0.00028247217,0.0006827787,0.00017563601,0.0015002842,0.0004881723,0.0005532981,0.007697293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008294814,0.00023623962,0.00038019737,0.00061927445,0.0006792746,0.0021434391,0.0011481713,0.0005618524,0.0008922032],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001334324,0.0002759314,0.048510812,0.0012746552,0.00032985854,0.0008789972,0.0020972854,0.0033401586,0.37043414,0.021882478,0.004007518,0.5456338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007735816,0.0006622116,0.8951944,0.00021198695,0.00024671512,0.0012215514,0.0007625612,0.01202592,0.031481117,0.05276508,0.005277412,0.00007365261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019149354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017816136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007697293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005298579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039560592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025749981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2759322883","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000492","title":"Postcategorical auditory distraction in short-term memory: Insights from increased task load and task type.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Vetenskapsrådet","keywords":"Distraction; Recall; Cognitive psychology; Short-term memory; Psychology; Task (project management); QUIET; Valence (chemistry); Working memory; Cognition; Audiology; Medicine; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.037755107571105,"score_gpt":0.33567473474165505,"score_spread":0.29791962717055004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2759322883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99785346,0.00042981032,0.0012473862,0.00002406726,0.000009287856,0.00001253052,0.000045972807,0.000018001356,0.00035944016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818265,0.0002136013,0.0010006009,0.00005158028,0.000014951398,0.00004043659,0.00013291955,0.000014059126,0.00034917958],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979526,0.000036609625,0.000024703111,0.000042734388,0.00007286348,0.000027867158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989353,0.00044187918,0.00023832366,0.000213353,0.00004325465,0.0001279855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053100276,0.00040048125,0.000327893,0.0002834412,0.00010863192,0.0003663841,0.00046479327,0.0003535874,0.0010154727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012069724,0.0001722674,0.00025733965,0.00015471292,0.00044743184,0.0004069151,0.0005053559,0.0005682146,0.00014860561],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002403122,0.00047108356,0.0038289672,0.00013858623,0.000028284629,0.00019365993,0.0001443008,0.00007889887,0.98074454,0.00013502814,0.000034580407,0.01179896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028001753,0.008026709,0.44920805,0.00005048751,0.00019179874,0.0023833597,0.00035866228,0.003943057,0.53264207,0.0018524672,0.0010242142,0.00003900595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028271708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047514518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0010154727,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017015528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017065997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0033971071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765915158","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000445","title":"Creating a recollection-based memory through drawing.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recall; Encoding (memory); Psychology; PsycINFO; Cognitive psychology; Recall test; Memory test; Context (archaeology); Free recall; Recognition memory; Test (biology); Encoding specificity principle; Context-dependent memory; Word (group theory); Serial position effect; Cognition; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06973707763085163,"score_gpt":0.3794849891808982,"score_spread":0.30974791155004655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765915158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87846875,0.008420295,0.08134822,0.0009057783,0.00044311222,0.00046448346,0.00054152554,0.0014126503,0.02799522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9198745,0.005230825,0.06449202,0.0004772409,0.00010147028,0.00020134408,0.0006400105,0.00013934865,0.008843326],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978346,0.000054956126,0.000013275319,0.00006505961,0.00006337542,0.000019958019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989999,0.00046448476,0.00019720221,0.00018334472,0.000060166974,0.00009497967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046159726,0.0004103962,0.00025748005,0.00032790363,0.00010950765,0.0007416787,0.0005736461,0.00039427314,0.007275048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032703483,0.00017714094,0.00025572296,0.0002488168,0.00034131669,0.0014120276,0.0005672316,0.0005840214,0.0010538804],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018261379,0.0013165396,0.005535039,0.0013892796,0.00015668795,0.00035800552,0.00080322026,0.0005649574,0.42766568,0.0032926095,0.004634451,0.55245745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085987605,0.015154152,0.16456366,0.00074224593,0.00078898744,0.0044866414,0.0011047298,0.0070586456,0.709108,0.016953088,0.07901155,0.00016841656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017942255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004475276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007275048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011732486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011596334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02433747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766122547","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000470","title":"An imagery-induced reversal of intertrial priming in visual search.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Visual search; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.20136617222289752,"score_gpt":0.48457191568115593,"score_spread":0.28320574345825844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766122547","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97925055,0.0011019235,0.012376642,0.00015901958,0.0002384541,0.00017361724,0.00016480351,0.00047705625,0.0060579395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934517,0.00021061134,0.0044334037,0.0001491774,0.000036135243,0.00012739151,0.00012348608,0.00014374244,0.0013243519],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952817,0.00014440155,0.000048611837,0.00010623778,0.0001200301,0.000052576772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672323,0.0018192229,0.000661339,0.00047111482,0.00012722993,0.0001978896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007288574,0.00048410188,0.00045850148,0.00023091873,0.00009025586,0.00030302771,0.00030275542,0.00042363937,0.0030085593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060118623,0.00030296907,0.0003141108,0.00014200468,0.00043767618,0.00049433624,0.0005948078,0.001081316,0.0005161306],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0042065475,0.00027060413,0.0015276184,0.00039543243,0.000035901445,0.00022828653,0.0001671088,0.00016991094,0.9709982,0.0007954692,0.00025613466,0.020948766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011148445,0.010718686,0.19732268,0.00016246442,0.00023458438,0.00271416,0.00015118111,0.009006451,0.7687551,0.0057568327,0.003969963,0.00009297775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019902308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024913202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030085593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014094665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018092473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0100646615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2786015159","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000566","title":"The resilience of verbal sequence learning: Evidence from the Hebb repetition effect.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; Université Laval","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Repetition (rhetorical device); Sequence (biology); Sequence learning; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Set (abstract data type); Communication; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Speech recognition; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.05102796156355669,"score_gpt":0.375647262602612,"score_spread":0.3246193010390553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2786015159","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99265057,0.00059062004,0.003727585,0.00019874897,0.000020829675,0.000041564803,0.00011688819,0.000076936994,0.0025762904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974771,0.00026928025,0.0013016204,0.00007959021,0.000011137825,0.000029855866,0.00009650854,0.000014240604,0.0007206293],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994281,0.0001430543,0.00005146135,0.00017611038,0.00014514753,0.000056096782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935016,0.0015360344,0.0018404886,0.002320888,0.00039369962,0.0004073507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001330166,0.00024443268,0.00034125178,0.0006756954,0.00025757652,0.00038714992,0.0005572548,0.00044488392,0.0020475208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00816939,0.00019639863,0.00019662142,0.00021731763,0.002001179,0.00076747884,0.0010850902,0.00076508155,0.00035822947],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004370003,0.0017217676,0.18716069,0.00080549426,0.00072508794,0.002372152,0.004683364,0.001993914,0.6276973,0.005598404,0.0017382,0.16113369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013709147,0.0068582715,0.8275071,0.000095076655,0.0002912427,0.009532034,0.0011249098,0.0028851402,0.13194405,0.01228606,0.0072455993,0.00009344709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011601063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011928692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020475208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025462135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000431404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0070346594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790116138","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000493","title":"Explaining the association between music training and reading in adults.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Association (psychology); Psychology; Reading (process); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Reading comprehension; Music psychology; Short-term memory; Working memory; Developmental psychology; Music education; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07806947670389378,"score_gpt":0.35280939239667247,"score_spread":0.27473991569277867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790116138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99117017,0.0032970994,0.000668162,0.0007929874,0.000026649413,0.00003013402,0.0004772446,0.000017866641,0.0035196238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969013,0.000914882,0.0009895319,0.00010188663,0.000031591197,0.000014913191,0.00031385507,0.0000028121392,0.00072917],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997049,0.00008538989,0.000045713237,0.00008413068,0.000053020598,0.000026817946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937355,0.0039034435,0.0016642783,0.0002426283,0.00029783146,0.00015639824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085994066,0.00031053234,0.0002549938,0.0008091323,0.00017354729,0.0006238965,0.0004279732,0.0005930668,0.006526329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117655285,0.00013182685,0.00033458276,0.00057222496,0.00033483325,0.0006901241,0.00032081536,0.00036757012,0.0003247227],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025352286,0.00022271936,0.95149636,0.00035292306,0.00016806497,0.0004346459,0.0014053045,0.00019351892,0.0005111509,0.0005343348,0.00073197903,0.043695617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013853412,0.00012254421,0.9967024,0.000072004164,0.00009729601,0.00024449627,0.0005285636,0.0006138551,0.000116468735,0.0010687079,0.0004156956,0.0000039584393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072284783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013717958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072284783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027295185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041900636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021832705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790133766","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000499","title":"Individual differences in semantic processing: Insights from the Calgary semantic decision project.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Concreteness; Vocabulary; Semantic similarity; Lexical decision task; Semantic memory; Natural language processing; Semantics (computer science); PsycINFO; Computer science; Population; Age of Acquisition; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Linguistics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.04962392041940241,"score_gpt":0.33569843967110946,"score_spread":0.28607451925170707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790133766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929986,0.00023176544,0.0014404258,0.00027595973,0.000009457647,0.00006375617,0.0017035062,0.000024279509,0.0032522406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99337727,0.00011092591,0.0024366248,0.000089201116,0.000009062029,0.00014057013,0.0026114832,0.000049257964,0.001175497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871194,0.00044453127,0.0000891472,0.00027552183,0.00037993013,0.000098989214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892887,0.0056865704,0.0019358406,0.0014945968,0.0008773374,0.0007170193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036535522,0.0002905279,0.0003902038,0.0013383924,0.00047136258,0.0018617228,0.0006649002,0.00050656206,0.0019966369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022568606,0.00019110995,0.00024224554,0.0015904239,0.0010136077,0.0012928279,0.002013904,0.0009374901,0.00037790445],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010691376,0.0005231853,0.8262213,0.00020706342,0.00035585198,0.000414907,0.026046578,0.0022088052,0.006680493,0.0050697103,0.008238242,0.122964785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014776693,0.000061993655,0.9902801,0.000019628804,0.000013678749,0.00008709511,0.0019663507,0.0015997519,0.0004115316,0.0035716605,0.0019543464,0.000019176885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031125987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036124192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031125987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009267711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005628926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06188965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790216848","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000515","title":"Phonologically-based priming in the same-different task with L1 readers.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Task (project management); Cognitive psychology; Lexical access; Lexical decision task; Linguistics; Coding (social sciences); Orthography; Natural language processing; Computer science; Cognition; Reading (process); Mathematics","score_opus":0.037692973637305185,"score_gpt":0.3428048652481142,"score_spread":0.30511189161080904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790216848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925841,0.000111434994,0.003174662,0.0001397436,0.00008520014,0.00014970242,0.00010213035,0.00012280293,0.003530276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98689264,0.00011227646,0.008292659,0.0004108242,0.000058584807,0.00032743832,0.00014072044,0.00011732408,0.0036475244],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895453,0.0003773834,0.00008594082,0.00040685743,0.000110816756,0.000064319815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99540895,0.0030028527,0.00052322657,0.0006190709,0.00022043625,0.00022545808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017216614,0.0007177359,0.00075099716,0.0002832586,0.00044986035,0.00094644696,0.0005943386,0.0010017172,0.0041220104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066646845,0.0005087381,0.00031969574,0.00017572816,0.00075095205,0.0017217319,0.0010327554,0.001653129,0.0014130655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037322163,0.0020311554,0.0037530372,0.00043777408,0.00003769027,0.0004485725,0.0074431426,0.00009256084,0.9663159,0.0014238444,0.00051349064,0.013770656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018101424,0.02344663,0.11409898,0.00013872155,0.00034123723,0.0054540555,0.002878886,0.0054975348,0.8264695,0.008186512,0.01135845,0.00031927944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071254687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000783188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041220104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022059647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039481735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013789535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796621789","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000498","title":"Two sources of information in reconstructing event sequence.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Encoding (memory); Computer science; Episodic memory; Context (archaeology); Event (particle physics); Sequence (biology); Task (project management); Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.05367539324736547,"score_gpt":0.37017033192399607,"score_spread":0.3164949386766306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796621789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.833019,0.0050489507,0.11618085,0.0023007507,0.00040782947,0.00055380765,0.0012669422,0.00042844715,0.040793393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93786174,0.0017663211,0.055656277,0.00030360758,0.00010707814,0.00022794546,0.0008006635,0.0000914924,0.0031849437],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984249,0.0003915542,0.00014029995,0.0004013997,0.0005514222,0.000090468246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98541355,0.007698715,0.003200585,0.0018393176,0.0012320058,0.00061577593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027449436,0.0005244241,0.00029560208,0.0012916365,0.00035086228,0.0021044372,0.00079981715,0.0012826633,0.004692491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035111777,0.0005794256,0.00054785435,0.00080837705,0.0012278693,0.004993257,0.0016861246,0.0013265989,0.00075115927],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063534053,0.0011520807,0.120591596,0.0023583623,0.00051042304,0.0016988793,0.0061866893,0.0054596355,0.17558123,0.05819365,0.003180413,0.61873364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072795886,0.0039354907,0.6020595,0.0014994134,0.0012479762,0.0057286015,0.0030180453,0.039711583,0.19665724,0.12932554,0.01580198,0.0002867095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013966849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002038304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004692491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006774266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006211175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015697956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801511174","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000555","title":"The native-language benefit for talker identification is robust in 7.5-month-old infants.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Language Development and Disorders","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Indexicality; Psychology; Linguistics; Speech perception; Phonology; Language acquisition; Population; Identification (biology); Perception; Language development; Developmental psychology; Medicine; Biology","score_opus":0.02389356902266797,"score_gpt":0.3538881832460669,"score_spread":0.32999461422339893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801511174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969392,0.00070036104,0.0004312779,0.00007534763,0.00005350141,0.00001447701,0.0002852365,0.0001072675,0.0013935046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959317,0.00050682446,0.0011929122,0.00011688968,0.000030303538,0.000046765836,0.0004832854,0.000044962388,0.0016464251],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949884,0.000057200858,0.00005377071,0.0001590755,0.00012460806,0.000106554486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696153,0.00087287277,0.0007545333,0.0002963512,0.0003465741,0.0007680881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090191845,0.0003372073,0.0007775001,0.00061911455,0.0002803887,0.0006752026,0.00031924286,0.00055771816,0.003908729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029789726,0.00029459345,0.00050433184,0.00010384986,0.00047493892,0.00053614296,0.0009385536,0.00085028936,0.00090163277],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019545031,0.00048117922,0.03471012,0.0003596258,0.000080624595,0.0025104333,0.0009694195,0.000040873754,0.91688544,0.0001963784,0.00052614766,0.041285187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003607244,0.0047380393,0.8636232,0.000050905142,0.00017904586,0.0065000653,0.00089732127,0.00022494592,0.12095596,0.00025179106,0.0025040586,0.00003855777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075419113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013308409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003908729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016483456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002677188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013076007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801996353","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000551","title":"Word length, set size, and lexical factors: Re-examining what causes the word length effect.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Word length; Word (group theory); Stimulus (psychology); Word lists by frequency; Recall; Speech recognition; Computer science; Psychology; Natural language processing; Mathematics; Cognitive psychology; Sentence","score_opus":0.048818289292256366,"score_gpt":0.3717974574903239,"score_spread":0.32297916819806755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801996353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534224,0.02047857,0.011288396,0.0026197268,0.00037778268,0.00013546442,0.00033994913,0.00017437161,0.011163306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833099,0.0040714457,0.0073869126,0.0010549318,0.00026006397,0.00011477301,0.00029354947,0.0001529222,0.0033554162],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882,0.0003577044,0.000112512156,0.00034665602,0.00030478687,0.000058246194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658098,0.025919799,0.004025391,0.0027503334,0.00092446484,0.00057014084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035664297,0.00090420246,0.00072462065,0.0009753183,0.00023661678,0.0012602288,0.0014687448,0.0010247715,0.006798452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03222615,0.00039829867,0.0008658317,0.00068422384,0.0027507073,0.004868173,0.0012534054,0.0016914641,0.00056092755],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008888698,0.0018991577,0.30054364,0.005155169,0.002270525,0.0019435098,0.0052272975,0.0024677436,0.11117329,0.029739982,0.0033205028,0.5273706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040149104,0.0037530446,0.85824573,0.00081182894,0.002325319,0.0015442462,0.0015852633,0.005082011,0.044046685,0.07106819,0.01092105,0.00021508434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024197013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025517049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006798452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007143952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082144816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022743046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883325825","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000547","title":"Contributions of reader- and text-level characteristics to eye-movement patterns during passage reading.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Text Readability and Simplification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development","keywords":"Eye movement; Cognitive psychology; Reading (process); Vocabulary; Cognition; Psychology; Computer science; Psycholinguistics; Reading comprehension; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02853277318405379,"score_gpt":0.33424594013566167,"score_spread":0.3057131669516079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883325825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98986745,0.00034638128,0.0074558095,0.00003451339,0.000013756353,0.000043163425,0.00039335224,0.0000794715,0.001765992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719703,0.00008288864,0.0020991769,0.0000079950805,0.000007204983,0.000024327095,0.00022830111,0.000020983389,0.00033200133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995912,0.00012241078,0.000037110756,0.00014183282,0.0000794706,0.000028021004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388474,0.0036971478,0.0014488598,0.0005219958,0.00029791822,0.00014940022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007228433,0.00021882528,0.00025762542,0.0005727357,0.00012543985,0.00055148144,0.00017088353,0.00028767737,0.0013561138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011094539,0.00014876627,0.0001939156,0.0006147575,0.0002588328,0.0005614421,0.00036009002,0.00029200214,0.00023570326],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00097122916,0.00012617903,0.6804299,0.0003003325,0.0002750586,0.00023197188,0.0016908735,0.0011775994,0.1978132,0.0003039127,0.00039181393,0.116288014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035675168,0.00007975952,0.9949852,0.000005157709,0.000024564975,0.00012487778,0.00011132352,0.0011521183,0.0032131576,0.00013079381,0.00016269466,0.000006698957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010884751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024482068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013561138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013264836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014588622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0045366883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883432769","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000653","title":"Cueing color imagery: A critical analysis of imagery-perception congruency effects.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cued speech; Psychology; Mental image; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Color vision; Categorization; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Computer science","score_opus":0.02272610776763031,"score_gpt":0.3542408102807866,"score_spread":0.3315147025131563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883432769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89324373,0.0039543547,0.083032675,0.00049104885,0.0003927602,0.0023302939,0.0032058493,0.0008852115,0.012464146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95097977,0.00056730025,0.04465387,0.0001901037,0.000082547165,0.0011317637,0.00088519015,0.00044366892,0.0010657086],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917245,0.00017945678,0.00008129785,0.00023513725,0.00027169642,0.000059929553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834984,0.012662702,0.001537641,0.0010732043,0.0008760885,0.000352078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027241444,0.0005054503,0.0006724839,0.0027270308,0.00058774714,0.0009827104,0.0007010962,0.0005747059,0.008032052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026328204,0.00036674284,0.00052026106,0.0015735,0.0010581893,0.0011927277,0.0010235533,0.0012112077,0.00034288346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010853113,0.00047010515,0.024530668,0.0028700407,0.0005871795,0.00076920725,0.0020185807,0.0011017439,0.8141199,0.009362537,0.002546734,0.1307703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062255043,0.0023982674,0.7798245,0.00019155534,0.0014752249,0.0017088891,0.00078685745,0.017158214,0.16198951,0.021261213,0.012374148,0.00020905414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001408741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022587166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008032052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059386686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005985769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026869893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889726762","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000610","title":"Drawing enhances item information but undermines sequence information in memory.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recall; PsycINFO; Encoding (memory); Reading (process); Task (project management); Referent; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Word (group theory); Free recall; Focus (optics); Computer science; Linguistics; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.0490759412260785,"score_gpt":0.35203232778577315,"score_spread":0.30295638655969465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889726762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723708,0.002936,0.011563905,0.0004310671,0.00016854194,0.0001175466,0.00016376823,0.00038888946,0.01185948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97020704,0.0026853085,0.020874538,0.0003865137,0.00014539271,0.00008662616,0.00040085285,0.00011008278,0.0051037893],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993142,0.00017635265,0.0000613896,0.0001664562,0.00023199961,0.000049752467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951019,0.0028788254,0.000923582,0.00069816294,0.0001516763,0.0002456595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086634903,0.00045944692,0.00040908362,0.0005439843,0.00020754423,0.0010402843,0.000638704,0.0008085026,0.007030419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007104403,0.0003499867,0.0004309221,0.0004210223,0.0007376429,0.0021188133,0.0007904585,0.0008501282,0.00082002545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023668914,0.0012517155,0.011773,0.001058612,0.00019999608,0.00053540745,0.0008102561,0.0005524084,0.7028697,0.003636608,0.001450488,0.273495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006252972,0.015679127,0.362781,0.0003411169,0.0012111204,0.004894363,0.00082758744,0.004103661,0.5681727,0.026202524,0.015029871,0.00013165068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004183518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010400346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007030419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028655722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030624864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023519099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2890297643","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000655","title":"The impact of text orientation on form priming effects in four-character Chinese words.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Education, India","keywords":"Psychology; Orientation (vector space); Priming (agriculture); Repetition (rhetorical device); Cognitive psychology; Repetition priming; Character (mathematics); Linguistics; Cognition; Communication; Lexical decision task; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.01924060529791806,"score_gpt":0.38045902541449533,"score_spread":0.3612184201165773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890297643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909695,0.00017323387,0.00096507906,0.00007216478,0.000046253026,0.000078412755,0.000063879714,0.000052232514,0.007579227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968412,0.0001234235,0.0014266906,0.00008651186,0.000020092688,0.000063343374,0.00006860943,0.000044681256,0.0013255054],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950445,0.00013478253,0.0000368766,0.00014916263,0.00011129304,0.00006349613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973769,0.0014474296,0.0005217394,0.0002426263,0.00015075185,0.00026053225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006134874,0.0005609644,0.00032890678,0.0002487736,0.00025984878,0.00060010614,0.00034996017,0.00043250984,0.005713276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044072755,0.00029179733,0.00030155558,0.00015354877,0.0006957597,0.0009009135,0.0006652378,0.0005851268,0.00057326985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026772053,0.0003873955,0.0054556183,0.0003086572,0.000024382762,0.00042477075,0.000948403,0.00017365464,0.96980417,0.0012207518,0.00014884821,0.018426184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006747267,0.0054905214,0.49496177,0.00008310514,0.00038101122,0.0020405706,0.0007708016,0.0041031726,0.47970408,0.00817053,0.0034879597,0.00013166793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011467879,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00085873035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005713276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003424599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037542515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019112825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898236089","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000660","title":"Examining the hierarchical nature of scene representations in memory.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Visual Attention and Saliency Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Scene statistics; Representation (politics); Set (abstract data type); Block (permutation group theory); Hierarchy; Hierarchical database model; Computer vision; Natural language processing; Psychology; Mathematics; Database; Perception","score_opus":0.039866065917474054,"score_gpt":0.3739641139099199,"score_spread":0.33409804799244586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898236089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96270853,0.0024742605,0.02221428,0.001018984,0.000054476026,0.00008565984,0.00019735566,0.00011467715,0.0111318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894621,0.00082136714,0.0076829037,0.00016040882,0.000018105775,0.00004430949,0.00022453257,0.000013649892,0.0015727264],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99983215,0.000031069612,0.000010329615,0.00006293083,0.00004162803,0.000021870881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982318,0.00083353254,0.00044918433,0.00024151367,0.00013099851,0.000112950394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062267634,0.00022977624,0.00020103119,0.0007296591,0.00028432813,0.001352673,0.0007856318,0.00058612926,0.00373665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055646,0.00018801888,0.00019576482,0.0005784136,0.0010256739,0.0053665373,0.0007823726,0.00074002135,0.0003569625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017015487,0.0007292596,0.06905145,0.0016862965,0.00023049247,0.0005601958,0.0055610677,0.005502352,0.2917272,0.03742091,0.0043320893,0.58149725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033265466,0.0044722767,0.51460725,0.0005983572,0.00059912854,0.0015152837,0.00649096,0.06439895,0.13675985,0.2564599,0.013589219,0.00017608554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002966973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043469756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00373665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077208003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057081843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012500346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918866316","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000674","title":"Influencing the time and space of lexical competition: The effect of gradient foreign accentedness.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Lexicon; Competitor analysis; Competition (biology); Psychology; Duration (music); Pronunciation; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Business; Literature; Art; Biology","score_opus":0.017846571291883665,"score_gpt":0.3392645574769404,"score_spread":0.32141798618505674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918866316","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964676,0.0002953976,0.0009867522,0.000040036204,0.00001043084,0.000011305704,0.000041158884,0.00001198386,0.0021353536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986065,0.00009108105,0.0008387843,0.000036367554,0.000005597356,0.000008908827,0.000028201925,0.000016957883,0.00036765888],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997124,0.000094686504,0.000019066963,0.00008942017,0.00006169677,0.000022677155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962136,0.0024219349,0.00074695126,0.00018275561,0.0001242023,0.00031047183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004605576,0.00020738361,0.00021011296,0.00015397205,0.00015776852,0.000851102,0.00015920174,0.00027670636,0.0020324055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00491702,0.00018043493,0.00014428352,0.00010047026,0.00052594993,0.00048611153,0.00046173658,0.00037811018,0.0001707013],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027545693,0.00026488223,0.084835246,0.000181328,0.00010656277,0.00034656777,0.0013253348,0.0005743225,0.8764062,0.00056152896,0.00018885687,0.03245451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000391736,0.0009791508,0.95565397,0.000019407249,0.00009289113,0.00031591466,0.0006080429,0.0012120276,0.039566796,0.00082665,0.0006600819,0.000026085092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014229849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022875182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020324055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000230819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020039869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006799042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920038278","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000697","title":"Does letter rotation decrease transposed letter priming effects?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Perception; Psychology; Repetition priming; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Neuroscience; Cognition; Philosophy; Lexical decision task","score_opus":0.012037544988910284,"score_gpt":0.3098562301161653,"score_spread":0.297818685127255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920038278","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98867816,0.0006722292,0.002241761,0.00067134027,0.00010904547,0.00004728417,0.00016222846,0.00012887403,0.0072891293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99630105,0.00036662119,0.0016003288,0.00023397994,0.00003405211,0.00003099522,0.00010925769,0.000047983267,0.0012757413],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962735,0.00009867306,0.00003507693,0.000118554,0.000060688762,0.00005970162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770904,0.0009403679,0.00075237756,0.00031440606,0.00013985614,0.00014395206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005350592,0.00023183622,0.00040655333,0.00016537406,0.00011775987,0.0004325925,0.0003220141,0.00067172514,0.007130234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045179776,0.00028605986,0.00017168332,0.00016338725,0.0007279425,0.0010223162,0.00027670476,0.0004187709,0.0014843413],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034701983,0.00041237965,0.012755266,0.0003966974,0.000034757173,0.00044448493,0.0004073577,0.00010875138,0.9454994,0.0017849178,0.0005794283,0.03410645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050306745,0.0030754167,0.3507325,0.00009306522,0.0001565164,0.0026077745,0.00056683965,0.0015095298,0.6290488,0.005238817,0.0064243884,0.000043229225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072038826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008089835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007130234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022569485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037046624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023853004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921720569","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000695","title":"The impact of a momentary language switch on bilingual reading: Intense at the switch but merciful downstream for L2 but not L1 readers.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Reading (process); Linguistics; Downstream (manufacturing); Language transfer; Psychology; Control (management); First language; Computer science; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Natural language processing; Comprehension approach; Artificial intelligence; Natural language","score_opus":0.03400199887740044,"score_gpt":0.3608565379213412,"score_spread":0.32685453904394074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921720569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99919933,0.00003273704,0.0000832905,0.00001760804,0.0000016863793,0.0000029534535,0.000022504859,0.000005577642,0.0006344525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923456,0.000038217815,0.00018071102,0.0000327376,0.0000028794843,0.000010140774,0.00004894141,0.00000755671,0.00044428185],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999838,0.00002969024,0.0000065690037,0.000067101486,0.000027671813,0.000030978197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942076,0.00025964537,0.00015315309,0.000041409487,0.00003351166,0.00009161207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001933582,0.00019015478,0.00018563842,0.00015056194,0.00018311219,0.00053160114,0.0001508134,0.00032360523,0.0018824788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011001189,0.00013645129,0.0001069209,0.00008711502,0.000449646,0.00042043792,0.00043921507,0.00034063339,0.00017299183],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028745416,0.00019620745,0.025646055,0.00009398178,0.000024037878,0.0002943109,0.00093637925,0.00008041164,0.9586495,0.00019068472,0.000088188244,0.0109256115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007137145,0.0019032995,0.91110235,0.000016596392,0.000055496264,0.0004723138,0.0009966467,0.00044371551,0.083832614,0.0005066782,0.0005794171,0.000019492505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014733936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003968427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018824788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003391868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022715077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0062975883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940682685","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000716","title":"Developing global spatial representations through across-boundary navigation.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Task (project management); Boundary (topology); Representation (politics); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; PsycINFO; Contrast (vision); Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02541901012674785,"score_gpt":0.3690082436961063,"score_spread":0.34358923356935844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940682685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9586962,0.00057425787,0.031057125,0.00014341298,0.000020610554,0.000022333023,0.00005104013,0.000121399666,0.009313702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867399,0.00023493526,0.011741332,0.000047576435,0.0000036566637,0.000014045727,0.00007978183,0.000014180629,0.0011246933],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998338,0.000033422206,0.000007833073,0.00007162682,0.00003429522,0.0000189357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992091,0.00018183251,0.00026827343,0.00018764527,0.00008874504,0.0000644231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042262554,0.00026273183,0.00013305018,0.00022569593,0.00011679298,0.0007127513,0.0002636113,0.00037539296,0.0018748018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024080342,0.00013916646,0.0001741907,0.00015170156,0.00052403734,0.0024719036,0.0008438838,0.0004117005,0.00025757164],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044585913,0.00034322374,0.09613672,0.0009937269,0.00019963227,0.0007031732,0.025942959,0.004773347,0.33719373,0.024674902,0.0022734099,0.50631934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016858186,0.0032517465,0.6797165,0.00049428403,0.00047823976,0.0036248395,0.01859218,0.024156444,0.1238972,0.08768924,0.057698682,0.00023207846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060511206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009888111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018748018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012414259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017198102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006271839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945464291","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000717","title":"Benefits from morphological regularities in dyslexia are task dependent.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Text Readability and Simplification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Azrieli Foundation; Israel Science Foundation; German-Israeli Foundation for Scientific Research and Development; International Development Research Centre","keywords":"Dyslexia; Task (project management); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Reading (process); Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.02486016120334763,"score_gpt":0.286088772061162,"score_spread":0.2612286108578144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945464291","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976053,0.00021849378,0.00015334082,0.000046513534,0.000005734271,0.000010137863,0.00014999324,0.000028334081,0.0017820634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857247,0.0001503047,0.00027680013,0.000046548637,0.000004247586,0.000012739969,0.0002136181,0.000009043775,0.0007140913],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997862,0.000032141183,0.00003742785,0.000074466894,0.00004451187,0.00002528255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782985,0.0008011675,0.0008252532,0.0002416463,0.000066865374,0.00023513526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031015242,0.00044137365,0.00030926662,0.00069794257,0.00013602959,0.00057992863,0.00022704228,0.0005143194,0.0042726137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029074412,0.0001629552,0.00014978726,0.0002161175,0.00068244146,0.00066743407,0.0006518473,0.00037933572,0.0006904092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061957063,0.0016011053,0.38891998,0.0009747916,0.00026471048,0.0024762189,0.0018766015,0.00034917868,0.43264806,0.000906209,0.0017315685,0.1620559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045198754,0.0013439127,0.9898545,0.000022323811,0.000049569968,0.0015064738,0.00036357885,0.00014544089,0.005411949,0.0008387868,0.0004091294,0.000009231998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083013007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013196643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042726137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002098631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013110328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014293313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956643022","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000742","title":"Cross-language activation and executive control modulate within-language ambiguity resolution: Evidence from eye movements.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Canada Research Chairs; Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music","keywords":"Linguistics; Animacy; Psychology; Psycholinguistics; Cognate; Neuroscience of multilingualism; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.030600711007280415,"score_gpt":0.35995808494681997,"score_spread":0.32935737393953957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956643022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972344,0.0007744405,0.0005553306,0.000058153677,0.000006696221,0.00000855122,0.0000830782,0.000011658631,0.0012677383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980933,0.00042829206,0.0008208098,0.00006180679,0.0000070783867,0.000017839344,0.00009990835,0.000008513349,0.0004624624],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987197,0.000029645922,0.000007352577,0.000039045535,0.000031855765,0.00002008884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991714,0.00033480063,0.00029918,0.000060149992,0.000079614845,0.000054967077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030285874,0.00021088246,0.00011845541,0.00031847102,0.00012891821,0.00036309732,0.00011376676,0.00029384703,0.0011799043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001810629,0.00016918911,0.00013001967,0.000180918,0.00027082418,0.00036323187,0.00036009314,0.00031477207,0.00013483838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001919725,0.00022811673,0.122114465,0.00031524737,0.00021703185,0.0005228585,0.003156195,0.00022230706,0.80075526,0.00057518115,0.00049057626,0.06948306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005307602,0.00018979884,0.98626035,0.000013753532,0.000038971106,0.00022002673,0.00031313524,0.00041981626,0.011527829,0.00033982942,0.0006127144,0.000010725368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019771757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037700604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019771757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015764311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117816024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0039471984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2962734277","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000748","title":"Detecting spelling errors in compound and pseudocompound words.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Text Readability and Simplification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morpheme; Orthography; Spelling; Compound; Natural language processing; Word (group theory); Speech recognition; Task (project management); Control (management); Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Computer science; Word recognition; Psychology; Communication; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.02387598674403773,"score_gpt":0.3108783492838626,"score_spread":0.28700236253982486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2962734277","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914165,0.00035350895,0.0014664003,0.00008168237,0.00006067438,0.00013775035,0.001272911,0.00011917492,0.0050914492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98718446,0.00028951108,0.006704082,0.00011915883,0.000017406335,0.00010871399,0.002014974,0.000023856617,0.0035378314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995802,0.000050382496,0.00011507839,0.00013692939,0.000096406475,0.000020949516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598444,0.0023038925,0.0008116611,0.0003804415,0.00035441507,0.00016522323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005506392,0.0003859017,0.00027136333,0.000583226,0.00016465201,0.0005551904,0.00034649865,0.00069889444,0.013355851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00906022,0.000117772324,0.00011244717,0.0003962234,0.00030806745,0.000825615,0.00037934352,0.00027980865,0.0028862103],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0069709774,0.0011332772,0.23150566,0.0013066408,0.00015715799,0.0025022738,0.0027804724,0.00037402823,0.21355851,0.00083650334,0.0061384984,0.53273594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028353903,0.0034351673,0.89259195,0.0001236757,0.00012111644,0.006455473,0.0015243964,0.002976014,0.083809115,0.001387988,0.007231369,0.00006016388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010511125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015878471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013355851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017268976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002325172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04467976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975821877","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000766","title":"Isolating the contribution of perceptual fluency to judgments of learning (JOLs): Evidence for reactivity in measuring the influence of fluency.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metamemory; Psychology; Fluency; Cognitive psychology; PsycINFO; Perception; Task (project management); Metacognition; Processing fluency; Stimulus (psychology); Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.0749914647355964,"score_gpt":0.37259673028406354,"score_spread":0.2976052655484671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975821877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98226154,0.00068001536,0.008908856,0.00015983073,0.000076554934,0.000089551126,0.00019962159,0.00005273248,0.0075713284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934082,0.00030663385,0.0047252737,0.0002919535,0.000040515468,0.00012385845,0.00017142188,0.00005029289,0.000881958],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972108,0.0011352951,0.00016229792,0.0007050162,0.0007157383,0.00007084931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96865964,0.018495293,0.0065783435,0.0044232095,0.0008605672,0.0009828969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003953223,0.0003147631,0.0003088344,0.0005890797,0.00027742062,0.0008206375,0.00042396577,0.00067125604,0.0018287463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029678054,0.0003346507,0.00021689493,0.00027207314,0.0012985904,0.0006775609,0.0010477947,0.001395923,0.00030229508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048565674,0.0025874965,0.21567099,0.0010072864,0.00077824586,0.00032560035,0.0052077253,0.0011134373,0.61050487,0.0032733113,0.001135855,0.15353869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005103598,0.0017842014,0.9572771,0.0000622963,0.00011665273,0.00027850605,0.0002655674,0.0014186453,0.035200045,0.0024796722,0.0010215045,0.00004483228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008961777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009832948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003953223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002900795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018217249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020906866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979328376","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000775","title":"What is learned in procedural learning? The case of alphabet arithmetic.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Child and Animal Learning Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Arithmetic; Alphabet; Computer science; Mathematics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.023305621706003747,"score_gpt":0.34815223506152293,"score_spread":0.3248466133555192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979328376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9145784,0.0040199365,0.0046251556,0.013261667,0.00015031653,0.000033003438,0.000103655555,0.000060745115,0.06316706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880971,0.0018154283,0.004128528,0.0009293024,0.000058279984,0.000024197987,0.00008977029,0.000011394284,0.0048460243],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966455,0.00009917014,0.000018237597,0.000092850576,0.0000810251,0.000044143002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886477,0.00040226764,0.0003249028,0.00021204507,0.00007673372,0.00011930334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006736173,0.00010973626,0.00012444766,0.00025972197,0.00028221132,0.0010285842,0.00044097958,0.00070226006,0.0018378831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055528865,0.00013700225,0.000100039,0.00024936706,0.002294662,0.00220118,0.00043481326,0.0007603427,0.00039564705],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003209195,0.00064123666,0.20129041,0.0005255408,0.000056611443,0.00991677,0.042700596,0.0010178809,0.015969634,0.10847913,0.011740623,0.6073407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006137618,0.0008557732,0.56151843,0.0005608416,0.000081783845,0.028153876,0.031850368,0.0044979854,0.019032327,0.23683675,0.11646903,0.00008158442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022712206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045221015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022712206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003813966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004962613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0061483383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2989630423","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000798","title":"Musical ability, music training, and language ability in childhood.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Musical; Psychology; Linguistics; Communication; Cognitive psychology; Art; Visual arts; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0446968740277267,"score_gpt":0.34395774061705064,"score_spread":0.29926086658932394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2989630423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909961,0.0020785502,0.00011229326,0.0005154211,0.000028091259,0.000008158223,0.0017446335,0.000017061348,0.0044995425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99656904,0.00078347046,0.00024921529,0.000036080182,0.0000193004,0.00001381644,0.0011460546,0.0000039798138,0.0011791047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996425,0.000075743475,0.000046254143,0.00006728205,0.00008481289,0.000083419116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933288,0.0022576598,0.0029002228,0.00031569722,0.0002691134,0.0009284571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007386984,0.00034191136,0.00025375228,0.0010313336,0.00040322565,0.0009787141,0.00047792424,0.00054837787,0.006470668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008131956,0.0002624164,0.00041260634,0.0011817102,0.0005326005,0.00066172675,0.00065252295,0.000769935,0.0005003738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008241691,0.000059743135,0.9920325,0.000041318657,0.00006655478,0.00023680189,0.00021735571,0.00013551512,0.00007363979,0.00024010583,0.00048779784,0.006326209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020119683,0.000025001636,0.9991848,0.000021348904,0.000017290138,0.0001411684,0.00008794593,0.00010275942,0.00003625235,0.0001521678,0.00022765671,0.0000017704374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017000612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03469622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017000612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005792215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007255808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033803344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992803039","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000794","title":"Cue combination used to update the navigator’s self-localization, not the home location.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Computer vision; Geography","score_opus":0.022959211049246725,"score_gpt":0.3635518743060285,"score_spread":0.3405926632567817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992803039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.937789,0.0010256933,0.057492282,0.0000657435,0.00009539387,0.00007958653,0.00012970163,0.0003534493,0.002969139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799804,0.00017331241,0.019048382,0.000051292256,0.00001636272,0.00003786713,0.00011460506,0.000041069077,0.0005366316],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993357,0.000109134715,0.000043735956,0.00020733982,0.0002326305,0.000071367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980513,0.00064166344,0.00044651082,0.00030887133,0.00038036922,0.00017125857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000516074,0.0005689619,0.00044702663,0.00044772576,0.00020727112,0.0006496781,0.0003621168,0.00045625566,0.001906288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00795357,0.0002914334,0.00028914653,0.00026455824,0.0002729045,0.0010129132,0.0008530311,0.00041821023,0.00032664312],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030717317,0.00023482504,0.04566028,0.00063255825,0.00022627617,0.0004093579,0.0005620397,0.0037704962,0.7506005,0.0013434218,0.0004845237,0.19300398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003610383,0.009603471,0.49215537,0.00024340262,0.0012716429,0.0042420574,0.0015015,0.06316992,0.40511742,0.007349398,0.01454491,0.00043981624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012137995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018480583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001906288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022731909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044989126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006377101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996074328","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000799","title":"Masked form priming as a function of letter position: An evaluation of current orthographic coding models.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Orthographic projection; Coding (social sciences); Current (fluid); Priming (agriculture); Computer science; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Biology; Engineering; Statistics","score_opus":0.06813576955629204,"score_gpt":0.3861021826809662,"score_spread":0.31796641312467416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996074328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86416215,0.0013012264,0.10740974,0.00086950767,0.00021583427,0.00025695932,0.00065713865,0.00082809245,0.024299303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97749305,0.00030773183,0.019924829,0.00013178239,0.000027588785,0.000109998735,0.00015688501,0.000119996774,0.0017281383],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990308,0.0004529707,0.000036068457,0.0002596337,0.00019078866,0.000029692708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875422,0.010005283,0.0009084464,0.0011470189,0.0002824232,0.00011463447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036726643,0.00034788565,0.0002710851,0.00026302107,0.0002157031,0.0010677523,0.00092683913,0.00046379663,0.008717699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019017486,0.0003227265,0.00035685426,0.00033648382,0.00061472063,0.001763411,0.0005456528,0.0006140981,0.0010999527],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027847566,0.0020869807,0.05362605,0.001786761,0.0004437817,0.000514028,0.004030622,0.056541514,0.12840419,0.18827975,0.011610378,0.52482843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016452683,0.0034888939,0.07770241,0.0003034873,0.0008167132,0.0014346172,0.0005901056,0.6094311,0.06679663,0.22735786,0.010238415,0.00019442588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019557034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013967368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008717699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006771329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005108546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02916354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006919138","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000831","title":"Relational processing demands and the role of spatial context in the construction of episodic simulations.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Identity, Memory, and Therapy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Baycrest Hospital","funders":"Brain Research New Zealand","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Spatial contextual awareness; Computer science; Cognitive science; Data science; Psychology; History; Artificial intelligence; Archaeology","score_opus":0.030998936181480002,"score_gpt":0.32421114911582694,"score_spread":0.29321221293434696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006919138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96581393,0.00060942833,0.012177518,0.00066615886,0.00002754843,0.000079031255,0.00025041055,0.000047134865,0.020328814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99013066,0.00041626854,0.008173081,0.000079826365,0.000014637903,0.00010158936,0.00024373922,0.000031716172,0.00080858],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825424,0.00057197205,0.00016438722,0.00037763317,0.0005246994,0.00010707691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96965384,0.020668129,0.005788151,0.0023530382,0.00092486973,0.000611996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031947598,0.00033328132,0.00021029415,0.00046493666,0.0005755062,0.0038581535,0.0010696857,0.00076036766,0.005938457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05053423,0.00047582708,0.00022555933,0.00069309305,0.0014109724,0.005677201,0.002449255,0.0010828701,0.00034874753],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031068593,0.0010771434,0.26036888,0.005268746,0.00033573655,0.0031556105,0.14163843,0.0131320935,0.13368541,0.12353235,0.004316694,0.31038213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001503429,0.0012681137,0.7459597,0.0010509572,0.0003061457,0.0045213806,0.04929119,0.0370166,0.025764626,0.10968226,0.024679093,0.00030944977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022787603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004471896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005938457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008500135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067455263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019866168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008429089","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000823","title":"Speech spoken by familiar people is more resistant to interference by linguistically similar speech.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Psychology; Intelligibility (philosophy); Linguistics; Speech perception; Speech recognition; Perception; Computer science","score_opus":0.036084480303280056,"score_gpt":0.37210837758652837,"score_spread":0.33602389728324833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008429089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99649435,0.00022891154,0.0012331405,0.000042775053,0.0000179381,0.000023678156,0.00004324577,0.000020557407,0.0018954842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99741936,0.0001232143,0.0015603607,0.00009218841,0.00001969354,0.000023008715,0.00009734307,0.000020464999,0.00064435456],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990829,0.00021653433,0.00008776388,0.00029475527,0.00023885471,0.000079197074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982412,0.000700135,0.0004143365,0.00018791672,0.0001938153,0.00026253407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091064244,0.00043486943,0.0003766921,0.00037569925,0.00033647803,0.000997197,0.00020275541,0.000543835,0.0030321563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004731011,0.00030485328,0.00026834235,0.00011233025,0.00060591515,0.0007215456,0.0012151211,0.0003787973,0.0005472406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022572163,0.0003560092,0.07560757,0.0005400356,0.0002795084,0.00091896526,0.004350188,0.00020174746,0.8657884,0.00032341268,0.0003470797,0.04902995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066462584,0.0023279865,0.9300357,0.000043196258,0.00018857312,0.0022743756,0.0027768128,0.00061811646,0.058736123,0.0008285317,0.002045573,0.0000586311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042782046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008861637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030321563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014656091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014891813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010143518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008768993","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000813","title":"Electrophysiology reflects the influence of discourse context on auditory semantic processing in bilinguals.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Concordia University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Electrophysiology; Linguistics; Communication; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; History","score_opus":0.03724270337001196,"score_gpt":0.3613524681347203,"score_spread":0.3241097647647083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008768993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99747425,0.00020476716,0.0006182564,0.000038902457,0.000009146778,0.000009504771,0.00008694997,0.000016580152,0.0015414808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985624,0.00014598438,0.0006339888,0.00004732608,0.000008247366,0.000017263505,0.000098272285,0.000010370851,0.00047628084],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99988496,0.000026909916,0.000009117674,0.00003786028,0.000020214016,0.000020910806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957377,0.00013172143,0.00011219735,0.000028255665,0.00006733513,0.000086680455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002746887,0.00021722628,0.00015517387,0.0002892003,0.00023027518,0.00038724736,0.000089919624,0.0003242386,0.0020821523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011523119,0.00016127307,0.00009760932,0.00013183213,0.00038599313,0.00029410463,0.00037759473,0.00030556356,0.00030021023],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070077594,0.000054115804,0.030351158,0.00009529348,0.000022361293,0.0005182368,0.0011626267,0.000020690464,0.9568754,0.00012668669,0.00011214114,0.009960519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050707757,0.00049791345,0.9573763,0.000021774218,0.000034582255,0.0018151372,0.0015669076,0.00027526307,0.03723617,0.00051723904,0.0005922785,0.00001565496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015133647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029596866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0020821523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013913208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017760537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0069654584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010411668","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000825","title":"Do visible semantic primes preactivate lexical representations?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Lexical access; Prime (order theory); Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.04779934208311536,"score_gpt":0.38284310681559974,"score_spread":0.3350437647324844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010411668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9808819,0.0009879288,0.009725401,0.00042169238,0.00016420774,0.0000795396,0.00013356679,0.00010851947,0.0074972105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99271506,0.0007576274,0.0041903933,0.00023783237,0.0000756236,0.000062523824,0.00011301816,0.00007496535,0.0017728391],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973506,0.000041879575,0.00002151112,0.00009930813,0.000066608896,0.000035671874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988919,0.00060456555,0.00022092905,0.00013416557,0.000075414544,0.00007317546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046962313,0.0003643783,0.00043179304,0.00026428848,0.00018076005,0.0006200582,0.0003393002,0.0006647991,0.0042486885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024726114,0.00041373182,0.00024256932,0.00018208635,0.0007423059,0.0019255502,0.00058087957,0.0006214168,0.0008128998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010107799,0.00016061074,0.002073154,0.00039765495,0.000015838368,0.00030350505,0.0004641234,0.000115965035,0.9700153,0.0032187712,0.00015325496,0.022071052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004927722,0.0030185138,0.19992217,0.00018375537,0.00015565666,0.0032206092,0.0014794964,0.0032623333,0.73422194,0.04695331,0.007030785,0.00005866916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002235894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003202989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0042486885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024112978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034172123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014213264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010834168","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000820","title":"Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stroop effect; Psychology; Color term; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Word lists by frequency; Contingency; Cognition; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Neuroscience; Sentence","score_opus":0.11758722665856766,"score_gpt":0.3684712580344513,"score_spread":0.25088403137588366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010834168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98424745,0.00022607362,0.012075534,0.00014947513,0.00025510398,0.0004469817,0.00025028439,0.0001880773,0.0021611806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9627102,0.00023823393,0.031413175,0.0004911711,0.00017310033,0.001766548,0.00035030846,0.0001563375,0.002700932],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890447,0.00020392674,0.00013626424,0.0003581291,0.000312025,0.00008528751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975973,0.00071530143,0.00077239814,0.00042271728,0.00017381237,0.00031839887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011464112,0.0009350677,0.00045675217,0.00061067496,0.00043914287,0.0006916878,0.0008202927,0.00052986416,0.0016832784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029659097,0.00071483146,0.00025620667,0.00038977584,0.0008555643,0.0007059624,0.0011078644,0.0015840651,0.0002103559],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002441531,0.0019561367,0.0008408246,0.00014361845,0.000064281376,0.000049290284,0.00043914106,0.00008275283,0.9836295,0.00076727045,0.00020974908,0.009375805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050827023,0.031211063,0.17294444,0.000076382705,0.0007359733,0.0007658647,0.00034799066,0.0065743914,0.76814663,0.004204169,0.009670553,0.00023991043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055817235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012790352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016832784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003229478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056564243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0060628653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3021700762","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000849","title":"Early activation of cross-language meaning from phonology during sentence processing.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Phonology; Linguistics; Meaning (existential); Sentence; Sentence processing; Psychology; Computer science; Natural language processing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.040555945593493695,"score_gpt":0.3473515053367388,"score_spread":0.3067955597432451,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3021700762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877707,0.00021855683,0.0010292039,0.00009061283,0.000030019299,0.000034582758,0.00047572228,0.00004471144,0.010305883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402,0.00012768518,0.0012944195,0.00008754017,0.0000067422084,0.000052378065,0.00051458215,0.000017887996,0.0038789208],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999316,0.000011736757,0.0000042371726,0.000021729038,0.000018090943,0.000012490723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968433,0.00012743182,0.00008717912,0.000017125803,0.000039932584,0.000043913275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017150694,0.00016268257,0.00010369134,0.00020427948,0.00010828949,0.000269557,0.00010675433,0.00026156288,0.007581635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009990485,0.00006788655,0.00006907769,0.00011835798,0.00018282155,0.00025159234,0.00029087518,0.00027021032,0.00046777306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000801352,0.000074316675,0.020385087,0.00018350259,0.000018105167,0.00054754765,0.0006758674,0.0000327195,0.92412615,0.00031319298,0.00073215214,0.052110087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017478167,0.00034976707,0.9623515,0.000027763015,0.000015564376,0.00046750787,0.00032784394,0.00026768717,0.034865603,0.00031136326,0.0009910148,0.0000069725525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011622516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034767056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007581635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015404372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016667074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025363028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3042870350","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000934","title":"Working memory load dissociates contingency learning and item-specific proportion-congruent effects.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive Science and Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Contingency; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Working memory; Contingency table; Cognitive load; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Cognition; Machine learning; Neuroscience; Linguistics","score_opus":0.0248433869899878,"score_gpt":0.2970638391860388,"score_spread":0.272220452196051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3042870350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917796,0.00023229675,0.0051696803,0.000045696983,0.00003477014,0.00006128868,0.00012407191,0.000095620664,0.0024570283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99544466,0.000078285484,0.0032853507,0.000083325096,0.000023877592,0.000096294265,0.00019899255,0.00007214432,0.0007171432],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902964,0.00013911416,0.00010272083,0.00034695488,0.00032370808,0.000057837697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919137,0.0037235569,0.00147404,0.0020404935,0.00032188513,0.0005263822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010290679,0.00047801784,0.00046141865,0.000547311,0.00017763331,0.0006585851,0.0006710153,0.00037036117,0.0030753769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00839277,0.00043123378,0.00040058684,0.00022574261,0.0008406838,0.0010658285,0.0013491008,0.0008306622,0.00029491156],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005050496,0.0011248115,0.030505223,0.0004931801,0.00025606426,0.00018612607,0.0006861672,0.0007115871,0.90628135,0.0011252922,0.00024239099,0.0533374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029804336,0.0032138643,0.72155684,0.000050086128,0.00028365955,0.000658016,0.0001429793,0.007302656,0.25928098,0.0056616063,0.0014828041,0.0000684198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038933632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048664282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030753769,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023119344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002326409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010288179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3043396802","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000941","title":"Comparing recollection and nonrecollection memory states for recall of general knowledge: A nontrivial pursuit.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Recall; Cognitive psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.058088003070488795,"score_gpt":0.3346082704187315,"score_spread":0.2765202673482427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3043396802","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9654598,0.0049801725,0.01216494,0.0008790992,0.00008974767,0.00020462378,0.0013579833,0.00013309297,0.014730441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946516,0.0006753884,0.003143708,0.00010384515,0.000036198628,0.00008444911,0.0005518118,0.00002073169,0.00073227775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986475,0.00059692294,0.00021043382,0.00023137989,0.0002537641,0.00005994064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562216,0.031140309,0.0044826106,0.005375197,0.0020200212,0.0007602588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005941413,0.00029136616,0.00039037195,0.0016458248,0.00031240607,0.0022928088,0.0009781445,0.00071949116,0.0063016317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06376813,0.00016331747,0.0003597529,0.002390283,0.0007932418,0.0053794603,0.0012886929,0.0007619565,0.000941085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001624398,0.0005033783,0.570954,0.001138786,0.00041635864,0.00020234237,0.009328299,0.00048576322,0.007236919,0.0061630807,0.002604353,0.39934233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003741526,0.0009783335,0.9651894,0.00036285352,0.00017517901,0.0007986814,0.005803827,0.0030668676,0.005360383,0.014693446,0.0034600622,0.000073504576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00128177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021292395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063016317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039939847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004292267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031421542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080528960","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000956","title":"Asymmetrical interference between item and order information in short-term memory.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Recall; Task (project management); Information retrieval; Computer science; Order (exchange); PsycINFO; Term (time); Serial position effect; Relation (database); Interference theory; Psychology; Free recall; Natural language processing; Cognitive psychology; Database; Working memory; Cognition","score_opus":0.04993582114645943,"score_gpt":0.32581343527448736,"score_spread":0.2758776141280279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080528960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90137434,0.0013263951,0.07267373,0.0003525978,0.00013624772,0.00013068221,0.00021746302,0.0003588708,0.023429714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832987,0.00030635018,0.013938235,0.00025021628,0.000053829775,0.00010017107,0.00033292393,0.000111377914,0.0016081373],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756587,0.00063919474,0.00025842822,0.0004814851,0.00095185795,0.00010328936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97111064,0.0213477,0.002717223,0.0034550242,0.00076775416,0.00060162466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032927978,0.0005172271,0.00058867724,0.00070325396,0.00034551133,0.00153453,0.0010979259,0.0006797247,0.0036890358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030751277,0.0004811493,0.00034813018,0.00064508093,0.0012314316,0.003803327,0.0021847144,0.0008673382,0.0008314256],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005214689,0.0007087487,0.056254257,0.0017158615,0.0003233921,0.00080392975,0.005741127,0.003150194,0.51708555,0.043406174,0.0025772557,0.36301884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009869329,0.00422358,0.45413598,0.00052903546,0.0008596929,0.005219745,0.0017206104,0.06312588,0.2142167,0.241038,0.013663102,0.00028073505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005565343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087958615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036890358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004940192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046448462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017414212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090082944","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000890","title":"Real-time communicative perspective taking in younger and older adults.","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Time perspective; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02872523314336388,"score_gpt":0.3221981168798924,"score_spread":0.2934728837365285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090082944","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99844164,0.0005289709,0.00009011138,0.00003893046,0.000009416724,0.0000073326687,0.0000794479,0.0000030301364,0.000801102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982091,0.0003494059,0.00018317967,0.00009143305,0.000019270095,0.00001533142,0.000113485745,0.0000028486158,0.0010159675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968576,0.00004211626,0.00003889972,0.00009615698,0.0000866743,0.000050466922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998487,0.00030654387,0.0005095233,0.00007779457,0.00020471448,0.0004143332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090360653,0.00039059532,0.00045482916,0.0006814328,0.00043100078,0.0011055593,0.00017543834,0.00077764905,0.0026024303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036118736,0.00021967631,0.00027293936,0.00022807265,0.0003573215,0.0010323245,0.00064329006,0.00049622887,0.00065477524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023389105,0.00077931944,0.80332625,0.0002602027,0.00013295279,0.0034503131,0.078134924,0.00007022837,0.04898569,0.00041899038,0.0010117883,0.061090525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003414897,0.0011287155,0.98228365,0.000024137498,0.000050181996,0.0018031482,0.011522476,0.000119206845,0.0011016901,0.00029914573,0.0015962931,0.000037126236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004425854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021689369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001744984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008705974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3105589805","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000970","title":"The art of planning ahead: When do we prepare for the future and when is it effective?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Human-Automation Interaction and Safety","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.04177726866473501,"score_gpt":0.39808621165314495,"score_spread":0.3563089429884099,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3105589805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38974887,0.23998922,0.026636299,0.1013254,0.002741016,0.00021153758,0.0010043905,0.0003509362,0.2379923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90219,0.068566345,0.012589449,0.005124774,0.00045679763,0.00020926929,0.0004604001,0.00008597442,0.010316985],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993272,0.0003141685,0.000052488755,0.00013590611,0.00010083767,0.00006944591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362224,0.0041268626,0.00103468,0.00040881688,0.00031638463,0.00049101876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00190409,0.00028317704,0.00031223992,0.00057403446,0.0009367209,0.0045198207,0.0006732181,0.0014586027,0.008255615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016736846,0.00019886279,0.00020923631,0.0008947418,0.0028812438,0.007033595,0.0008884061,0.0019399602,0.0017635972],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005966865,0.00021765617,0.03314729,0.002241081,0.00008302826,0.00039084587,0.023337021,0.0006403508,0.002537905,0.050119653,0.046150662,0.84053785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008667607,0.00070341356,0.24143882,0.0051404545,0.00019656536,0.0013432734,0.06991974,0.002756527,0.0032127087,0.32042068,0.35456,0.00022118044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003418585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005385508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008255615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011069993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018576575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027617753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125830495","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000992","title":"Updating self-location by self-motion and visual cues in familiar multiscale spaces.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Motion (physics); Computer science; PsycINFO; Contrast (vision); Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Boundary (topology); Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Computer vision; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008451103363440415,"score_gpt":0.28912202160481104,"score_spread":0.28067091824137064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125830495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916449,0.00022322201,0.0062327334,0.000027115539,0.000012878069,0.000012666448,0.000034237266,0.00004755382,0.0017646691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99603456,0.000083339415,0.0033662182,0.000020313431,0.0000042319125,0.00000776435,0.00005452085,0.000010379539,0.0004186848],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998609,0.000026828988,0.000009583903,0.00005705005,0.00003264267,0.000013004384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915016,0.00025496798,0.00034830187,0.00012315402,0.000062311265,0.00006114488],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030183114,0.00021888246,0.00015426362,0.00021062404,0.00009343051,0.00055951305,0.00022744181,0.0002908699,0.0016944162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036692687,0.0001369701,0.00015414393,0.00016445339,0.00034944862,0.0013707993,0.0005003747,0.00022584337,0.0001408436],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001638403,0.00046233402,0.108033605,0.0007331715,0.00024074789,0.00039499506,0.006119475,0.0056222654,0.52761984,0.004113361,0.0011692859,0.34385243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016675083,0.002651637,0.8782721,0.00009193561,0.0002502489,0.0006206855,0.0030416176,0.025838066,0.06856174,0.014175802,0.006226622,0.000102862294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010145019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015958574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016944162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001538306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013679743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005668342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31282724","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000742","title":"Organisation of Structured Export Financing by Commercial Banks in Russian Federation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture; Centre for Research on Brain, Language and Music","keywords":"Russian federation; Finance; Business; Order (exchange); Capital (architecture); Financial system; Economic policy; Geography","score_opus":0.03365463106869395,"score_gpt":0.2604745374829367,"score_spread":0.22681990641424274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31282724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99599624,0.00006257363,0.00007369145,0.00007018047,0.0000022456356,0.0000067055976,0.00008574312,0.000005173626,0.0036974065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984627,0.000031980595,0.00007542938,0.00000621838,0.0000013635148,0.0000028780066,0.00008649911,0.0000019087772,0.001331183],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998361,0.000045877565,0.000008617756,0.000032332042,0.000015238225,0.00006181884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996252,0.00006142323,0.00013303346,0.00002269127,0.00005130644,0.00010630109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023376041,0.00008033017,0.00011910182,0.0006136111,0.0008032657,0.0010286513,0.00022296245,0.0002791883,0.0041092755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006461485,0.00009302175,0.0001204873,0.00059055927,0.00046150116,0.00037746373,0.00070142874,0.0001340758,0.00031286062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039112018,0.00013527481,0.9227794,0.000088151515,0.00005446807,0.002379291,0.022359453,0.0024872224,0.00812038,0.010559556,0.0033379106,0.027307723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005575406,0.000036486363,0.9828198,0.000017488157,0.000011048699,0.00014434448,0.009592322,0.0015985899,0.0003400243,0.00050745194,0.004919366,0.0000075113703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041932005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056430805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041932005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017393851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009420422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08337587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163287076","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001039","title":"Simulating semantics: Are individual differences in motor imagery related to sensorimotor effects in language processing?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hotchkiss Brain Institute","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Motor imagery; Embodied cognition; Cognitive psychology; Task (project management); Sentence; Psychology; Semantics (computer science); Sentence processing; Natural language processing; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Brain–computer interface; Electroencephalography; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.02864507917551367,"score_gpt":0.3537493713518399,"score_spread":0.32510429217632625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163287076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99862754,0.000052665935,0.0008332564,0.000036708345,0.0000045380075,0.000013396957,0.000032798347,0.000007282027,0.00039191858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99913234,0.000030199632,0.0005336773,0.000026980619,0.000004510858,0.000015839925,0.00004414387,0.000007885382,0.00020445527],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964166,0.00007373115,0.00003594713,0.000154009,0.000062248466,0.000032412714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965017,0.0017789643,0.0008104958,0.0006024742,0.00013949495,0.00016683836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010981477,0.00023643681,0.00027153725,0.00046921975,0.00014847206,0.00050728925,0.00023027365,0.00036521675,0.0019505296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006650777,0.00022337037,0.00022089387,0.0002294765,0.00078453845,0.0007593029,0.0004209073,0.00044308623,0.00017551381],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019779704,0.0007032243,0.66871303,0.0003241139,0.0005185058,0.00032202265,0.007926382,0.0014674427,0.22859897,0.001255261,0.00032839135,0.08786472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012441759,0.00026251597,0.99356705,0.000005725139,0.00003213358,0.00013749246,0.00033149798,0.0007464049,0.0040608,0.0006804405,0.00015051739,0.000013042409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006518007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087142334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019505296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012249702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012734067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006525159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3175341885","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001035","title":"Gesture and reference to objects in the here-and-now: Listeners’ use of gesture cues in quiet and in noise.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Hearing Impairment and Communication","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Gesture; Comprehension; Gaze; Context (archaeology); Utterance; Computer science; Psychology; Speech recognition; Cognitive psychology; Communication; Computer vision","score_opus":0.07679773896873926,"score_gpt":0.3778353174916472,"score_spread":0.30103757852290797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175341885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9958454,0.00037466173,0.0017825624,0.000046755224,0.000026809685,0.000017719225,0.00004821107,0.000030992098,0.0018268919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553114,0.00032553077,0.0028170364,0.00011209773,0.000031908756,0.000053312855,0.000106622196,0.000057511945,0.00096484186],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993105,0.00020416941,0.000042352454,0.0002020203,0.00017756589,0.000063275584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845386,0.001039914,0.00015644792,0.000089166846,0.00012740906,0.00013326503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006069254,0.00046715434,0.00043123524,0.00023362317,0.00034370966,0.0011334432,0.00043430662,0.0009783058,0.0013127463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006519661,0.00038104644,0.00031447364,0.00013979181,0.00094205746,0.0011754318,0.0013803021,0.0005315183,0.00032623668],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013173745,0.00006516621,0.0029328659,0.00026297348,0.000038241968,0.0003739061,0.009558054,0.00009486385,0.97417384,0.0001849526,0.000099367746,0.010898363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061912736,0.0067391377,0.6046553,0.00027019903,0.0009427842,0.0032257026,0.02095907,0.0049341763,0.34147725,0.0034346646,0.012348739,0.00039375076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013469805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016581195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0013469805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018437959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002354472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004391551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205335422","doi":"10.1037/xlm0000901","title":"Stimulus-based mirror effects revisited.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Concreteness; Psychology; Stimulus (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Novelty; Communication; Social psychology","score_opus":0.025844948299091702,"score_gpt":0.3666432790461631,"score_spread":0.34079833074707144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205335422","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34600678,0.026449274,0.38016343,0.016935764,0.0037400653,0.003118038,0.0028862616,0.0029540565,0.21774644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8907198,0.0034695393,0.08381461,0.0071573006,0.0006042939,0.0016117017,0.0007963234,0.0008536669,0.010972717],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890576,0.0036521128,0.0007583811,0.0026171296,0.0036952738,0.0002195446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9588266,0.027382066,0.003957729,0.007744491,0.0016686211,0.00042060774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137903895,0.00084216753,0.0011411557,0.0010148658,0.0005983961,0.0024860178,0.0032363047,0.0023561923,0.01745478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0830245,0.0008772581,0.0016524572,0.00083657686,0.0050457064,0.0077905147,0.0038541714,0.0050948365,0.0017980754],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053707412,0.0006739673,0.019258073,0.0066825934,0.001166864,0.0015923189,0.0044394457,0.0026465845,0.14897619,0.4238764,0.008746036,0.37657082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009757892,0.0031004825,0.11747047,0.0013747507,0.0009541464,0.0052348794,0.00079844875,0.0102580255,0.10346983,0.70801383,0.04806089,0.00028850627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009189524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080066174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01745478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011623778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010123608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07293141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3206155042","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001066","title":"A multilingual preregistered replication of the semantic mismatch effect on serial recall.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"Psychology; Recall; Cognitive psychology; Semantics (computer science); Task (project management); Psycholinguistics; Cognition; Linguistics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04998837027284165,"score_gpt":0.3670421310947698,"score_spread":0.31705376082192815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3206155042","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942016,0.00040893667,0.0015392929,0.000050496237,0.000036470865,0.000059308757,0.0004418241,0.00022091973,0.0030410264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994833,0.00013709316,0.001823109,0.00012782155,0.000027187982,0.00009763951,0.00049153157,0.00014582153,0.0023168118],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983374,0.00032511237,0.00018032524,0.0006169584,0.00045324943,0.000087030356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935789,0.0018597827,0.0015015352,0.0022809058,0.00047922245,0.00029963275],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011319477,0.0007552383,0.000565232,0.0005690774,0.00034146104,0.000439379,0.0007115724,0.0005198385,0.0055570113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056358664,0.00036916233,0.00045761856,0.00026497402,0.00092606095,0.00062569394,0.0012880781,0.0006952205,0.0009706329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063086287,0.0009481302,0.02003533,0.00068740157,0.00036959493,0.0019953493,0.0015315216,0.00020217722,0.92108417,0.0003215371,0.00067434745,0.04584177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046298676,0.015728489,0.6453762,0.00007087002,0.00064414047,0.009051353,0.00091271556,0.00052767154,0.32102314,0.0008732017,0.0052114935,0.00011780817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025595508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034307465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99886805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035007813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044737261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018590033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209253063","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001093","title":"The production effect over the long term: Modeling distinctiveness using serial positions.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; New Brunswick Innovation Foundation; Université de Moncton","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Serial position effect; Term (time); Recall; Short-term memory; Computer science; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Word (group theory); Long-term memory; Free recall; Arithmetic; Speech recognition; Working memory; Mathematics; Cognition; Social psychology","score_opus":0.048438797642237255,"score_gpt":0.3646527499456168,"score_spread":0.31621395230337956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209253063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6144976,0.0018835703,0.37498412,0.0005377531,0.00009090349,0.000103996186,0.0004237336,0.00042333335,0.0070550274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615791,0.0008068015,0.033400834,0.00008212029,0.000059701746,0.00013473166,0.00023112925,0.00009499774,0.0036105374],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997507,0.00008889506,0.000011304692,0.000064733926,0.000048031263,0.000036394646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969212,0.0019705226,0.000474361,0.0003301687,0.00015708871,0.00014663141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018656994,0.0010189381,0.0006810481,0.0010162905,0.00027254436,0.0009464884,0.001359501,0.0011045823,0.0021636556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005662517,0.00050968165,0.0016911381,0.0009138928,0.000847859,0.002429225,0.00090992387,0.0011413477,0.000500514],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009825504,0.0005038677,0.036599413,0.0003308077,0.00043407496,0.0008715714,0.0005978061,0.7821607,0.029098077,0.07771729,0.0014299066,0.069273934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048776954,0.00024864043,0.005951809,0.000015966869,0.00009781443,0.00012868087,0.000017635022,0.96806806,0.0011062981,0.023645768,0.0006483214,0.000022263244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005787378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042393846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005787378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063403934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011507392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209846081","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001092","title":"The passive state: A protective mechanism for information in working memory tasks.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive Functions and Memory","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Academy of Finland; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Working memory; State (computer science); Test (biology); Task (project management); Computer science; Psychology; Speech recognition; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Algorithm; Engineering; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.02563695166343103,"score_gpt":0.3300133300161416,"score_spread":0.30437637835271053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209846081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9903831,0.00035159738,0.0037876675,0.00029029988,0.00012426474,0.00008228435,0.00035293915,0.0001528456,0.0044750837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994134,0.00017646828,0.0020499874,0.00017852221,0.00002716489,0.00008496249,0.0002819353,0.00003343015,0.0030336767],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997986,0.00003688077,0.000023802935,0.000068444824,0.000049157694,0.00002314751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998505,0.0004477065,0.0003547158,0.00044165217,0.000057411315,0.00019354507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007715207,0.00031747427,0.00028525374,0.00018371781,0.00018174463,0.0009939773,0.00075041235,0.00054072007,0.0076297326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022960103,0.00020760005,0.00016438204,0.00011223079,0.0006710232,0.0013090638,0.0006784698,0.0010380717,0.0009780667],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015244765,0.0039648185,0.010761673,0.0007325177,0.0002039782,0.00033276228,0.0015104765,0.00030476984,0.83486325,0.0071800705,0.0035700707,0.12133082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049510836,0.034449816,0.2943673,0.000609561,0.0011254237,0.0034236526,0.001216289,0.014723798,0.5749874,0.045567118,0.024381977,0.0001965685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024192725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029982664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076297326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020028903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026530717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02552396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210759845","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001083","title":"Developing global spatial memories by one-shot across-boundary navigation.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Affordance; Orientation (vector space); Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Boundary (topology); Human–computer interaction; Perspective (graphical); Spatial relation; Position (finance); Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.04023951777017746,"score_gpt":0.36051451470824425,"score_spread":0.32027499693806677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210759845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98561645,0.0005219342,0.012501687,0.000040280847,0.000018152934,0.000022582666,0.000039840423,0.0000748076,0.0011642651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864247,0.00023797611,0.012259135,0.00003056736,0.0000044377393,0.000018541898,0.00010207561,0.000009525237,0.0009130677],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999897,0.0000212085,0.0000063971147,0.000042624804,0.000018140972,0.000014621554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996691,0.00007998106,0.00008770975,0.00008621531,0.000030252244,0.000046724264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022379821,0.00032150673,0.00017201694,0.00013169456,0.00008949293,0.0003062203,0.00031727972,0.00030785546,0.0016048606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013296449,0.00014185581,0.00024971607,0.000081706574,0.0002483667,0.0010468973,0.0007395719,0.0002879608,0.00023815379],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009530609,0.00051715714,0.026351923,0.0009439042,0.00019563112,0.0006518693,0.006608053,0.0008971803,0.66088295,0.0016520716,0.0008409975,0.29950523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003548444,0.014450355,0.5468863,0.0003439729,0.0008593662,0.006849035,0.01236077,0.013512848,0.36274558,0.011942687,0.02944192,0.00025237698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024610845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064653286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016048606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006247133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009839751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005368769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216057240","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001086","title":"Keep an eye on your belongings: Gaze dynamics toward familiar and unfamiliar objects.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; Israel Science Foundation","keywords":"Gaze; Eye tracking; Prioritization; Object (grammar); Psychology; Task (project management); Eye movement; Cognitive psychology; Preference; Human–computer interaction; Observer (physics); Computer science; Communication; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.03672244493168597,"score_gpt":0.3700385245946872,"score_spread":0.33331607966300125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216057240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9907713,0.0010740877,0.0019388509,0.00014506919,0.000018607037,0.000024022665,0.0001858036,0.000027449296,0.0058147744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99631834,0.00063353695,0.0011169738,0.00010329683,0.000012859268,0.00001437834,0.0001893704,0.000012926673,0.0015983043],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998965,0.000028173046,0.0000046773803,0.00003254573,0.000026536136,0.000011492398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990884,0.00043622567,0.00026545723,0.000065794186,0.00009743596,0.000046648835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028815196,0.00017259689,0.00015686864,0.00035247422,0.00038325723,0.00052608177,0.00013196419,0.0003794963,0.0027757883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044785775,0.00010175891,0.000096019794,0.00028675675,0.00030901877,0.0006969692,0.0005169491,0.0003699141,0.0005123951],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016601974,0.0001983188,0.4025704,0.0006845872,0.00020642462,0.0013613189,0.059852865,0.0005165383,0.34215552,0.0044823512,0.007491915,0.17881955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002197162,0.0004715523,0.9679942,0.00015544778,0.00007072911,0.0015760576,0.010091349,0.0017152771,0.0069449083,0.0017360434,0.00918599,0.000036385976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022923758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004745107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027757883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018179612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012523739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009285927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216120123","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001095","title":"Bilingualism and executive attention: Evidence from studies of proactive and reactive control.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Cognitive Functions and Memory","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Working memory; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience of multilingualism; PsycINFO; Control (management); Attentional control; Executive functions; Proactivity; Adaptation (eye); Short-term memory; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.0802241870250326,"score_gpt":0.4093200843814946,"score_spread":0.329095897356462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216120123","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98045564,0.0066900067,0.00073311076,0.000534033,0.00003094292,0.000010920005,0.00029322985,0.000023414636,0.011228721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969117,0.0016108543,0.0003429396,0.00023706187,0.00003971874,0.000011524097,0.0001794362,0.000013476504,0.0006532159],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960655,0.000104799714,0.00003705764,0.00012608017,0.000092720154,0.000032779346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99226344,0.003327576,0.0028971715,0.00067748735,0.0003308216,0.0005034388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014582111,0.0002446542,0.0002689322,0.00082203024,0.00022366551,0.0010642208,0.00031192007,0.00040556045,0.0034407268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065867663,0.000161773,0.00014903872,0.0006999949,0.0011852374,0.00077297597,0.00062491326,0.00045835416,0.0002959266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005698997,0.00071606296,0.79821724,0.0016277843,0.0010301458,0.0010942454,0.005433265,0.0002142836,0.06559014,0.0051201684,0.001060307,0.1141974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004399654,0.000251394,0.9944254,0.00005269645,0.000127269,0.0005572818,0.00015506985,0.000065798995,0.0018430648,0.0015345168,0.00093330204,0.00001016918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022999395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041486286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0034407268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038276726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003732348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011510432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206094202","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001077","title":"Exploring the use of phonological and semantic representations in working memory.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Working memory; Semantic memory; Short-term memory; Phonology; Cognition; Semantics (computer science); Linguistics; Cognitive science; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.22157786999712015,"score_gpt":0.33753114686605223,"score_spread":0.11595327686893209,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206094202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99153274,0.00094888074,0.004249937,0.00018392068,0.000011290438,0.0000541457,0.000057412213,0.000016313432,0.0029452464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932132,0.00058534526,0.005066739,0.00012132019,0.000009881588,0.00014793157,0.00013645717,0.0000076295155,0.00071155885],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99964476,0.00013627435,0.000027517532,0.00009698371,0.000065729066,0.000028730272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948127,0.0038551337,0.0007208178,0.00032352895,0.00013323939,0.0001545013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015342202,0.00032887355,0.0002932789,0.00041898634,0.00024283754,0.0013765922,0.00082510186,0.000674249,0.0018589231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005503827,0.0002461047,0.00028094876,0.0003742313,0.0015683479,0.003695949,0.0007676277,0.00088850816,0.00018833663],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066717844,0.0027115385,0.11065438,0.0029334233,0.00040514066,0.00084468204,0.014310631,0.0018644576,0.48164147,0.02050352,0.0007946685,0.35666427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009124651,0.0147774825,0.67630965,0.00054607977,0.00083722686,0.002331685,0.008757164,0.023831839,0.14789775,0.1159815,0.007592808,0.00022449209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006007668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000990765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018589231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004355656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031128374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008113861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226024717","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001119","title":"A reexamination of the impact of morphology on transposed character priming effects.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Text Readability and Simplification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morpheme; Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Character (mathematics); Linguistics; Lexical decision task; Repetition priming; Communication; Mathematics; Cognition; Biology; Neuroscience; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020197376580676007,"score_gpt":0.31514183035548443,"score_spread":0.29494445377480843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226024717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94882774,0.0026726692,0.0111559685,0.002934446,0.0004058956,0.0005778124,0.00065977324,0.00032494773,0.03244069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98338276,0.0012350489,0.008457193,0.0021004982,0.00012788756,0.00026348146,0.00025979118,0.00013872098,0.004034607],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994242,0.00011944326,0.00008033937,0.00021482019,0.00011916201,0.000042050986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947326,0.0033333444,0.00053159834,0.0008773666,0.00042045355,0.000104623534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020826545,0.00058899156,0.0004005914,0.00047143898,0.00042629175,0.00080942456,0.0010894113,0.00061511976,0.0063832197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007738441,0.00027804184,0.00060504896,0.00043861617,0.0017750037,0.0021216937,0.0009367017,0.0016572216,0.00072343973],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003163661,0.00062291423,0.011734501,0.0027797266,0.00016604466,0.0015279066,0.0069186767,0.00023719583,0.8329226,0.015833639,0.0019369131,0.1221563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004858933,0.0032807924,0.40987876,0.00052710087,0.001158773,0.0032929073,0.0029726648,0.0026849487,0.50683045,0.023951996,0.044811256,0.00012440156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035819393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004240582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0063832197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052095955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075777154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02135396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230118872","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.28.5.858","title":"Covert operations: Orthographic recoding as a basis for repetition priming in word identification.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Orthographic projection; Orthography; Covert; Task (project management); Psychology; Repetition priming; Word (group theory); Identification (biology); Word recognition; Perception; Cognitive psychology; Speech recognition; Natural language processing; Lexical decision task; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Cognition; Reading (process); Linguistics; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04741052831818169,"score_gpt":0.3593239581152773,"score_spread":0.3119134297970956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230118872","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95563674,0.00069043913,0.02490553,0.0005072744,0.000108883665,0.00022076622,0.00015931507,0.00031155747,0.017459515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879512,0.00016574582,0.0098841945,0.00013482636,0.000038304628,0.00015832826,0.000121322955,0.00010967747,0.001436379],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937636,0.00016426203,0.000034983244,0.00017457428,0.00018525578,0.000064513006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586856,0.0022504725,0.0006824764,0.0007417153,0.00021621282,0.00024062661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011065855,0.0005272138,0.0002906182,0.00044524242,0.00026369878,0.0006277179,0.0007008884,0.0009677237,0.003798239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055587376,0.0006136818,0.00028701712,0.00016061074,0.0015438808,0.0016018907,0.0010993587,0.0010637348,0.0006683185],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017295921,0.0005109986,0.004923613,0.00033640044,0.000034903318,0.0014296044,0.0010705936,0.00023931747,0.9331942,0.016791087,0.00056434557,0.03917516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007762445,0.005853704,0.17253083,0.000166741,0.0002136703,0.016845401,0.00058969884,0.01127104,0.7211433,0.06554624,0.0049474663,0.00011566974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023551974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026643215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003798239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033264232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043705458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012706399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238860425","doi":"10.1037/0278-7393.26.4.900","title":"Updating geographical knowledge: Principles of coherence and inertia.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Geography Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Coherence (philosophical gambling strategy); Inertia; Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Physics; Statistics; Classical mechanics","score_opus":0.04772123244109669,"score_gpt":0.3991078436304452,"score_spread":0.35138661118934855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238860425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7066864,0.003646104,0.21313679,0.0066037523,0.00024005045,0.00033603996,0.00040852404,0.00048806178,0.06845427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796357,0.00034380556,0.01857546,0.00029960927,0.000041594223,0.000113276474,0.00015625743,0.000033918248,0.0008003788],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804616,0.00087767805,0.00012429521,0.00046931565,0.00037033102,0.00011208103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97057605,0.019869376,0.0045147035,0.0031126402,0.001204645,0.00072261743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004252182,0.00040553338,0.00037744155,0.0012114691,0.0006228805,0.0023252512,0.0009606329,0.0013488097,0.0029043409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05208341,0.0006185091,0.0006911268,0.00088623585,0.0031351605,0.005821836,0.002214524,0.0015063164,0.0002767148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012638585,0.00054938,0.13362731,0.0015067885,0.00094702747,0.0004903171,0.028000502,0.023883602,0.017109552,0.34217215,0.0072252466,0.44322437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050240115,0.00090933935,0.13306388,0.00031825338,0.0005889106,0.0007617026,0.0034934785,0.068572186,0.004745162,0.7636793,0.023168938,0.00019642095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026066196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019357612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004252182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009465398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005108826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022487938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251305899","doi":"10.1037//0278-7393.28.3.521","title":"Remembering remembering.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Psychology; Test (biology); Cued speech; Cognitive psychology; Recall; Cued recall; Context effect; Meaning (existential); Free recall; Social psychology; Linguistics; History; Word (group theory)","score_opus":0.07863032569942051,"score_gpt":0.33960273114753425,"score_spread":0.26097240544811373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251305899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90725523,0.0036482497,0.035152897,0.0012485774,0.00032250912,0.0006807866,0.0009263572,0.0005005004,0.050264876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655858,0.0011036029,0.021073611,0.0005984818,0.000062880164,0.00034945956,0.0007990849,0.000030374344,0.010396683],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947363,0.00012155467,0.000040709037,0.00019534133,0.00012469408,0.000043953958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99548316,0.0017106773,0.00045474654,0.001652283,0.00031579775,0.00038337786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013866771,0.00044305774,0.0002851852,0.00040764635,0.00029081278,0.0009960486,0.0007810486,0.00068218197,0.006651064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050919033,0.00017341958,0.00030263825,0.00020500728,0.0009218982,0.0016144557,0.001085147,0.00094500394,0.0011474857],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026160066,0.0041960184,0.046264656,0.0014754983,0.00015519613,0.0012008117,0.004124507,0.0010875027,0.25224826,0.08675805,0.0072355713,0.59263796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001185846,0.021271609,0.2020341,0.00047071258,0.00057591894,0.01401667,0.0020113129,0.010602498,0.3685541,0.114562675,0.26439646,0.00031811892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049713603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006435586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006651064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037320153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030202314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022250056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280537182","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001076","title":"Is the fast-same phenomenon that fast? An investigation of identity priming in the same-different task.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Mental Health Research Topics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"New Brunswick Innovation Foundation","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Phenomenon; Stimulus (psychology); Psychology; Task (project management); Negative priming; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; PsycINFO; Response priming; Identity (music); Social psychology; Neuroscience; Selective attention; Lexical decision task","score_opus":0.1294376206315003,"score_gpt":0.43513277249779053,"score_spread":0.30569515186629026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280537182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97949654,0.00049463636,0.013195248,0.00017685346,0.00010990719,0.00018376138,0.00021657381,0.00011926809,0.0060072253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98782456,0.00028209068,0.008937242,0.00028334334,0.000046251043,0.00021049342,0.00022752647,0.00017202743,0.0020165122],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913675,0.00028815516,0.000056084227,0.00023107193,0.00021822107,0.00006969458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884737,0.007902639,0.0014424863,0.0015826635,0.0003131336,0.00028532167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022096983,0.000364775,0.00058879843,0.0002809734,0.00023310917,0.0007004664,0.00052393397,0.0005728126,0.003578658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0130811725,0.0003925491,0.00035986956,0.00029426222,0.0009661834,0.0015859742,0.0008920493,0.0011716885,0.00043504252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009051408,0.0011214482,0.01767479,0.00089686346,0.0001424795,0.00039985098,0.001587004,0.0008378883,0.89153594,0.011284259,0.0012981279,0.06416989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010382308,0.01276827,0.51627415,0.00023352318,0.00069388206,0.006347122,0.0010386922,0.016707292,0.38975793,0.036728684,0.018142086,0.00027021434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004970225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048536004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003578658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017748585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033709142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011971831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281558495","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001143","title":"Contextual effects on spoken word processing: An eye-tracking study of the time course of tone and vowel activation in Mandarin.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Mandarin Chinese; Vowel; Noun; Vowel length; Tone (literature); Psychology; Linguistics; Context (archaeology); Hard rime; Computer science; Speech recognition; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.027171456176991588,"score_gpt":0.3746316000198277,"score_spread":0.34746014384283613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281558495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973304,0.0004235661,0.0008293939,0.000031326654,0.000011976634,0.00002132622,0.00020869571,0.000019888344,0.0011233761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971444,0.00029241113,0.0014296834,0.000060762846,0.000015445536,0.000046728164,0.00027989186,0.00001774007,0.0007129823],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992037,0.000009776456,0.000004824775,0.000034807752,0.00001760007,0.000012664071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963415,0.00015743315,0.00009814489,0.00002605404,0.00004648171,0.00003771365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018325349,0.00014099706,0.00020026899,0.0003378599,0.0002412015,0.00031261015,0.00015198736,0.00023992488,0.0012356462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010367655,0.00019971695,0.00013909732,0.000292364,0.00028644796,0.00033127292,0.00034973604,0.00036208282,0.00018471833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067042734,0.00007539901,0.026028518,0.00013385413,0.00004019302,0.00021822171,0.0009251901,0.00007506196,0.9584727,0.00016850072,0.00023321435,0.012958577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018341283,0.00024189438,0.97952247,0.000013830106,0.000030539508,0.0002539176,0.0002663105,0.00042880522,0.01844603,0.00015447363,0.0006125664,0.000010754998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003821578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013263799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003821578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029215726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002095959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007598698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283831186","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001144","title":"Robust evidence for proactive conflict adaptation in the proportion-congruent paradigm.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Stroop effect; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Contingency; Adaptation (eye); Stimulus (psychology); Social psychology; Cognition; Linguistics","score_opus":0.44153636075482705,"score_gpt":0.44993169961562857,"score_spread":0.008395338860801516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283831186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90724623,0.0014047407,0.06507217,0.00047208188,0.0004730222,0.0007122465,0.0009136649,0.00088716875,0.022818688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97154576,0.00033589665,0.022701936,0.0012361468,0.00012934503,0.0009285971,0.0005506932,0.00033697984,0.002234588],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967439,0.0006275078,0.00038907354,0.0008859023,0.0011776645,0.00017600243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98393273,0.007024061,0.002410128,0.004286246,0.0012944198,0.0010523128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030284238,0.000648903,0.00067269703,0.0006969247,0.0003838432,0.0007289842,0.0011541964,0.0008952304,0.0050280225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017619628,0.00057217316,0.0003993231,0.00042871755,0.0014546916,0.001070538,0.002430634,0.002321375,0.00083514367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015145703,0.00035338447,0.0027067075,0.00045714455,0.00008827761,0.0001529491,0.00030022327,0.00020633238,0.98178387,0.0010366153,0.00032673386,0.011073159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008091541,0.009655686,0.3522852,0.00013933463,0.00032028003,0.0045857993,0.0003098712,0.0077066096,0.6034621,0.010523048,0.0099694105,0.00023344955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006834535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080310495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050280225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027708465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061843806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016820371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293051799","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001167","title":"The influence of environmental geometry and spatial symmetry on spatial updating during locomotion.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Orientation (vector space); Asymmetry; Position (finance); Symmetry (geometry); Object (grammar); Artificial intelligence; Motion (physics); Perspective (graphical); Computer vision; Geometry; Computer science; Psychology; Communication; Cognitive psychology; Physics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.006963544875767756,"score_gpt":0.24608905966902264,"score_spread":0.2391255147932549,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293051799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99624026,0.00028475423,0.0015051746,0.0000391126,0.000012434873,0.000010342875,0.00007325917,0.000021191421,0.0018133279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998485,0.00017707303,0.0009602825,0.00001754689,0.000004475598,0.000011000205,0.00006667996,0.000014319633,0.0002635599],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998406,0.000040258827,0.000015156928,0.000036987713,0.000050838953,0.000016048529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857795,0.0005124133,0.0005821628,0.00013164594,0.00010506124,0.00009073495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020325015,0.00015571293,0.00013008142,0.0001525935,0.00008380371,0.0003985294,0.00017096437,0.00015365219,0.0014578778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037029546,0.000117560376,0.00013057355,0.00009081106,0.00037712292,0.00044332666,0.00033907738,0.00019311316,0.000113447946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021083863,0.0001703147,0.06919462,0.0005107261,0.00011184337,0.00046620567,0.0011290557,0.0018863241,0.77945435,0.0013165395,0.00059219677,0.14305934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040688457,0.00063872745,0.95869595,0.000028760707,0.00008938976,0.00026974484,0.0002220196,0.002979308,0.03495771,0.0012033635,0.00085148343,0.000022845019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012598179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002006584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014578778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019728488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021309937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0048770905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304957524","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001169","title":"Using preexperimental familiarity to compare the ICE and cue-overload accounts of context-dependent memory in item recognition.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Context effect; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social psychology; History; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.10490464750482625,"score_gpt":0.37040996960496364,"score_spread":0.2655053221001374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304957524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98600906,0.00036057623,0.01006276,0.000102863654,0.000034685392,0.00016126952,0.00014114633,0.000055199318,0.0030725629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99540424,0.00013385763,0.0029172064,0.00020475364,0.00003273051,0.00032723436,0.00018819862,0.00002694077,0.00076486665],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985916,0.00041663804,0.00013186726,0.00046984985,0.00028459486,0.00010534139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985104,0.009521149,0.002700611,0.0018787952,0.00031542208,0.0004800129],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002621113,0.00046984456,0.00057307835,0.00029216727,0.00020387027,0.0007455752,0.0006753597,0.0006318535,0.0028887158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009171594,0.00035572407,0.0004088238,0.00029960007,0.0009774156,0.0019271052,0.0011561656,0.001003329,0.00031694263],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02351646,0.014999991,0.22666931,0.0014867911,0.00094777637,0.0008829901,0.0058568916,0.0056198067,0.54284066,0.010390842,0.0011804416,0.16560808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010523646,0.03527507,0.7124868,0.00009433155,0.0010616268,0.001464591,0.00074418046,0.027806351,0.2005877,0.0145815825,0.0046984158,0.00014692951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090196653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014667265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028887158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007190275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003670846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013861954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311667993","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001208","title":"Semantic richness effects in isolated spoken word recognition: Evidence from massive auditory lexical decision.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Second Language Acquisition and Learning","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Lexical decision task; Noun; Natural language processing; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.028129314477610582,"score_gpt":0.3473382687668714,"score_spread":0.3192089542892608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311667993","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940236,0.00015511352,0.0021099944,0.0000962636,0.000015933234,0.000029390505,0.00015662078,0.00003336745,0.003379802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997115,0.000061346094,0.0020419261,0.00011807427,0.000024802357,0.000038776754,0.00014568788,0.000044964232,0.00040936793],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979158,0.00065382425,0.00014084573,0.0006557004,0.0005451472,0.000088595436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.962972,0.026574425,0.004874892,0.00358336,0.0006516921,0.0013436319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003329487,0.0004578053,0.0006457167,0.0005879099,0.00031930557,0.0016477932,0.00064081146,0.0006823384,0.004746375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02957673,0.0007868123,0.00045265962,0.00028948195,0.0017280936,0.0026894698,0.0032785097,0.001152246,0.00054467743],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014141255,0.00156495,0.20503816,0.0010846225,0.0010880667,0.0009590833,0.007888144,0.0026489806,0.6411861,0.004177489,0.0017545307,0.11846862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037134386,0.0014774096,0.9669659,0.0000655634,0.00022043021,0.0008667738,0.00084414077,0.0047931154,0.013925748,0.009523103,0.0008759621,0.00007059955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005890875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095290097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004746375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017326488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019996731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017608225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312094168","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001201","title":"On the roles of form systematicity and sensorimotor effects in language processing.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Lexicon; Embodied cognition; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Object (grammar); Meaning (existential); Task (project management); Lexical decision task; Information processing; Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.016011202101499637,"score_gpt":0.31869548545854437,"score_spread":0.3026842833570447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312094168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9648134,0.001127248,0.020299088,0.00025223842,0.000035074532,0.000074661,0.00020853821,0.000063946325,0.013125871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99422824,0.00025305952,0.0045806975,0.000086960936,0.000013698179,0.000039345417,0.00012813625,0.000026334723,0.0006434094],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989422,0.00023408217,0.000052363455,0.00038569176,0.00032817048,0.000057418158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914274,0.004043893,0.0024411993,0.0011033058,0.0006591254,0.00032515894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002704279,0.0005769897,0.00029770262,0.0011912322,0.0003235938,0.0014013074,0.0003082649,0.0003784194,0.0024512887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014949529,0.00039000946,0.0005195304,0.0005435064,0.0014429443,0.0017250247,0.001808672,0.00060128665,0.00023227652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008954358,0.00029689516,0.5639836,0.0007065679,0.0006061712,0.0003536814,0.0089731775,0.003174075,0.14328443,0.010241136,0.00083972776,0.26664507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013711461,0.00024946075,0.9853292,0.00005017214,0.00007890747,0.00013104353,0.00063789974,0.002188427,0.004525128,0.005962771,0.0007960789,0.00003726735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022689765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032831687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002704279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034342456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003868677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014301777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323294550","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001229","title":"Visual re-anchoring in misaligned local spaces impairs global path integration.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Path integration; Path (computing); Odds; Computer science; PsycINFO; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Machine learning","score_opus":0.018117092987528716,"score_gpt":0.3292311607970024,"score_spread":0.31111406780947365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323294550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954522,0.00020935922,0.0019945519,0.00016824443,0.00017118602,0.00002042871,0.00027777915,0.00019343791,0.0015128243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948671,0.00020020327,0.0020255635,0.00019214381,0.000013456023,0.00006379402,0.00028632264,0.00011490425,0.0022365043],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996113,0.000034586046,0.000057779824,0.00014277098,0.00009519245,0.00005835531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997874,0.0006802663,0.0005804175,0.000513481,0.000044263663,0.00030761515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044174827,0.00071897643,0.00065538054,0.00034556733,0.0001568453,0.0006084835,0.00075906597,0.0009221823,0.010164984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028931417,0.00039402704,0.0002917612,0.00016385422,0.0013069671,0.0011503713,0.0010031994,0.0016057411,0.00065582787],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002745803,0.000565955,0.0015204381,0.00015641823,0.000055465363,0.0002639111,0.00032023335,0.00037199742,0.98166466,0.0003692541,0.00080398656,0.01116187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091036013,0.014432341,0.18571506,0.00021641207,0.00030644433,0.0023757531,0.0017435869,0.009018942,0.771753,0.007814166,0.0055593825,0.0001545825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014175598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010664536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010164984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026968194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000357219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034005225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361856293","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001226","title":"Modeling verbal short-term memory: A walk around the neighborhood.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Topic Modeling","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Recall; Psychology; Term (time); Cognitive psychology; Short-term memory; Semantic memory; PsycINFO; Episodic memory; Semantics (computer science); Cognition; Computer science; Social psychology; Working memory","score_opus":0.05058692894680105,"score_gpt":0.33380268679912745,"score_spread":0.2832157578523264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361856293","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19664976,0.0047862823,0.7818957,0.002253752,0.00012199584,0.00014604292,0.00047967624,0.00028696258,0.013379795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86259395,0.0025670445,0.12936138,0.00019012977,0.00014804554,0.00035548027,0.00041230573,0.00011076874,0.0042608944],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995888,0.00022903208,0.000019693205,0.00009395461,0.000043593143,0.000025004758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973092,0.001781075,0.00027352665,0.0003225905,0.00016327432,0.0001503574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014531526,0.00071674684,0.0008641256,0.0011376614,0.00058297336,0.0020839612,0.0026877937,0.0013436243,0.0030182377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007705449,0.00053707184,0.0013067344,0.0008357108,0.0010502912,0.00446862,0.0017645909,0.0014807112,0.0006166647],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019875051,0.00018126487,0.014840822,0.00032262778,0.00029598986,0.0007674,0.001837764,0.5219326,0.0027424365,0.41492894,0.0017521356,0.040199243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001680182,0.00009014021,0.0010539715,0.000036171616,0.000051793686,0.00013359672,0.000112822796,0.75074965,0.00023492615,0.24540104,0.0020999142,0.000019267716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006124572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047347373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006124572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071467715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056970556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012177885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365446798","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001240","title":"Cognate translation priming with Chinese–Japanese bilinguals: No effect of interlingual phonological similarity.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"Cognate; Priming (agriculture); Psychology; Phonology; Orthography; Linguistics; Tone (literature); Repetition priming; Similarity (geometry); Psycholinguistics; Lexical decision task; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Biology; Reading (process); Artificial intelligence; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.03629017246706258,"score_gpt":0.3591869561809334,"score_spread":0.3228967837138708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365446798","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967873,0.000163985,0.00046267305,0.000060150684,0.000072753115,0.00007141054,0.00010373351,0.000030286534,0.0022477023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99572647,0.00012457006,0.0013431843,0.00012601595,0.000033306118,0.00017417307,0.0002197181,0.00008078701,0.0021717334],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.999175,0.00016930418,0.00010096096,0.00032894927,0.00011328312,0.00011246748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806744,0.0007196855,0.00027385209,0.00031259298,0.00029042602,0.00033599493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095250795,0.0006639558,0.00091713865,0.00031592837,0.000571942,0.0005944349,0.00040436295,0.00074006047,0.0051157526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034263134,0.00051694125,0.00031531512,0.00023173988,0.000950278,0.0008213381,0.0010226307,0.00095150707,0.0009540007],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068072444,0.00055992755,0.001772649,0.00026147522,0.000033821998,0.00029746463,0.0013653359,0.000027816708,0.9840874,0.00028698132,0.00009614219,0.0044037364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027548473,0.012075062,0.19982629,0.00006284493,0.0007184303,0.0032320044,0.001543282,0.0023983184,0.76899064,0.0035257454,0.0046824943,0.00018998676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002423632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003302711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051157526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029734947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006647973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017113864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365450844","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001238","title":"Cross-language semantic parafoveal preview benefits in bilinguals.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cognate; Computer science; Linguistics; Psychology; Fixation (population genetics); Lexical access; Natural language processing; Cognition","score_opus":0.057419507266216425,"score_gpt":0.40148681782493356,"score_spread":0.34406731055871714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365450844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968334,0.00013864784,0.0002783461,0.00004926364,0.000014409968,0.000004846568,0.00026776196,0.000028472017,0.0023848084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983543,0.00009156914,0.00036009983,0.00004858245,0.0000058410324,0.000008786207,0.00017114301,0.000017933915,0.00094176974],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999362,0.000007692837,0.0000064154747,0.000022686127,0.000012407769,0.000014604442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965477,0.00010209071,0.00010108876,0.000033484997,0.00003247614,0.00007606914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025736372,0.00018748056,0.00022206228,0.00027040904,0.00015662368,0.00024790276,0.000076731645,0.00025704392,0.007447766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009464807,0.00009411825,0.00014133006,0.000085314445,0.00024131539,0.00046426992,0.00040518751,0.00025128573,0.00035309474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0045842193,0.00025342876,0.02302209,0.00024749295,0.000051548443,0.0008099449,0.00039343446,0.000103192055,0.941179,0.0005954245,0.00057058356,0.028189639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030687853,0.002060844,0.9166644,0.000046064033,0.00014924249,0.004268745,0.0007003438,0.0008571276,0.070345774,0.0025121788,0.0020626097,0.000025736927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002292029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045862836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007447766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019991316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002550587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024915278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384120109","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001272","title":"Aural and written language elicit the same processes: Further evidence from the missing-phoneme effect.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; New Brunswick Innovation Foundation","keywords":"Reading (process); Active listening; Cognition; Computer science; Psycholinguistics; Word lists by frequency; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Speech recognition; Natural language processing; Linguistics; Communication","score_opus":0.04225819475881031,"score_gpt":0.39173327302302396,"score_spread":0.34947507826421365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384120109","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99108773,0.00078421255,0.0018411324,0.00016260555,0.00004955322,0.00006248809,0.0003805805,0.000056324814,0.005575352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955585,0.00028488197,0.0022277236,0.00034465623,0.00005247104,0.00013833892,0.00030588187,0.00006540947,0.0010221547],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991092,0.00029660415,0.00008624916,0.00018699185,0.00026466142,0.000056240147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682224,0.023068188,0.0051309224,0.002012236,0.0006383414,0.00092785613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010769956,0.00026841654,0.00030949552,0.00036960005,0.0001528954,0.00060512044,0.00032259763,0.00080582825,0.005296089],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021937534,0.00033304407,0.00024595245,0.0002822985,0.0006870634,0.00084658427,0.0011312837,0.00085302093,0.000529745],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016087193,0.0014204651,0.031247105,0.0023240806,0.0002723225,0.0009872481,0.0042684907,0.0001490597,0.8700102,0.0010695537,0.0009036584,0.07126067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054388243,0.0035065776,0.90071195,0.00011854727,0.000244349,0.0021981124,0.0006098809,0.0008889257,0.08720479,0.0022317495,0.001700517,0.00004080694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025533803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033308883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005296089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114145136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015565088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017717183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386438876","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001289","title":"An examination of models of reading multi-morphemic and pseudo multi-morphemic words using sandwich priming.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Priming (agriculture); Morpheme; Lexical decision task; Repetition priming; Affix; Natural language processing; Dissociation (chemistry); Psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Linguistics; Cognitive psychology; Chemistry; Cognition","score_opus":0.10573518274345002,"score_gpt":0.38920623504059143,"score_spread":0.2834710522971414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386438876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41037965,0.0036676074,0.4015785,0.012265425,0.00074775884,0.0014082617,0.0008399325,0.0015719348,0.167541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93682086,0.0011493651,0.050471943,0.0012895992,0.000107501495,0.00096128933,0.00057124224,0.00019310875,0.008434993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.998114,0.00089070504,0.000060677845,0.00047359042,0.00035641846,0.00010456532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98253286,0.013222469,0.0013524733,0.0014802115,0.00087413355,0.000537901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008187491,0.0020554888,0.0014377306,0.0019470342,0.00088770094,0.0031385527,0.0044740727,0.002490323,0.01114517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018892627,0.0013022015,0.0031586841,0.0009145592,0.0030186723,0.008988827,0.0021208832,0.0035522832,0.0021616132],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00441661,0.0016173479,0.013564494,0.0019826698,0.0011522768,0.0021051008,0.0128882965,0.062166043,0.044857617,0.7752625,0.00845269,0.07153436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005865046,0.0018187095,0.010461793,0.00018492792,0.0007033046,0.0027277558,0.0009782705,0.32358974,0.009557452,0.642246,0.006854446,0.00029116852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028357261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019615924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01114517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018746422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011600892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043300092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386498156","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001287","title":"Irrelevant information enhances a sense of knowledge and curses our understanding of other minds.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Educational Strategies and Epistemologies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"Education University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Psychology; Semantic memory; Fluency; Test (biology); General knowledge; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08953459177995739,"score_gpt":0.40672264501911704,"score_spread":0.31718805323915966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386498156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9149212,0.0017702706,0.0206294,0.0029108452,0.00017442308,0.0000975866,0.00019665132,0.00018123075,0.059118416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98963857,0.0007814209,0.006715107,0.0004823409,0.00011015215,0.000036202317,0.00012957143,0.000040440365,0.0020662502],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971053,0.0009759556,0.0001833768,0.00047018856,0.0011653533,0.000099807075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668327,0.02254207,0.005149329,0.0030781731,0.0012675893,0.001130118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00294835,0.0003964561,0.00040943435,0.0014218701,0.00037834796,0.0024420565,0.0006081226,0.001215396,0.0073703313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032339573,0.00022985622,0.0004806105,0.00049124425,0.0015970097,0.0039184624,0.0023666688,0.0015340077,0.00056399213],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032037077,0.002690113,0.16283585,0.00465376,0.0012328139,0.0018186981,0.016295275,0.003104077,0.11835786,0.09688832,0.008492418,0.58042705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033027105,0.0033388278,0.7076892,0.0013272924,0.0016574282,0.0029360927,0.007158376,0.012536113,0.054235112,0.18155286,0.026967786,0.0002705602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049424457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007326667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073703313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005651388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046068427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024656177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387948710","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001293","title":"Can we change how people reason? Effects of instructions to reason differently and reasoning strategy.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Forecasting Techniques and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Counterexample; Probabilistic logic; PsycINFO; Dual (grammatical number); Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Preference; Mental representation; Dual process theory (moral psychology); Psychology of reasoning; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Cognition; Model-based reasoning; Knowledge representation and reasoning; Mathematics; Moral reasoning; Linguistics; MEDLINE; Statistics","score_opus":0.1070728096661912,"score_gpt":0.40885654242777786,"score_spread":0.30178373276158665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387948710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993374,0.0002950942,0.0008379934,0.00045413763,0.0000623899,0.00006218603,0.00033027845,0.000087311746,0.0044966256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99310315,0.00032591485,0.0025510334,0.00048725572,0.00003569287,0.00023375756,0.00038767126,0.000049216855,0.0028263822],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898237,0.00047318745,0.0001465591,0.00018853301,0.00015120102,0.000058044545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9567522,0.036019992,0.0041469834,0.0021221754,0.00033661246,0.00062203984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024059813,0.00028836305,0.00024288523,0.0002207206,0.0002003515,0.0012131758,0.0004397465,0.0007530392,0.010943778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05779488,0.00026947068,0.00027396606,0.00019137235,0.00052439934,0.0013587693,0.00069251534,0.0011037497,0.0010377166],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.059561994,0.01600545,0.2363411,0.0022045365,0.0015800183,0.00070164993,0.014339448,0.005478463,0.057766624,0.009423422,0.01734775,0.57924956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042589344,0.012692059,0.8991963,0.0003783166,0.0013436736,0.0005162987,0.0024578297,0.013760116,0.025326593,0.023265027,0.016594972,0.000209838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012356885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013812147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010943778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025250023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026437495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036610544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388722844","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001304","title":"From association to gist: Some critical tests.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Recall; GiST; Associative property; PsycINFO; Psychology; Association (psychology); Missing data; Illusion; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Medicine; Chemistry; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.04124632833985054,"score_gpt":0.4106162221087742,"score_spread":0.36936989376892365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388722844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55024374,0.009779368,0.23221171,0.051830973,0.0050342265,0.0028345438,0.0033489254,0.000797817,0.14391865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599736,0.0008693932,0.029535402,0.002692773,0.0013596998,0.0012410562,0.0004972017,0.000113144444,0.0037177242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483806,0.0017297305,0.00042109526,0.0013870611,0.0013756239,0.00024846682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.792438,0.1846405,0.0068904613,0.0065637603,0.0064369035,0.00303041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01823257,0.001059087,0.0006622716,0.0029874996,0.0017850728,0.0021555328,0.0032366123,0.0018903725,0.043611586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16390646,0.00032904383,0.0015575895,0.0021365506,0.014314883,0.012737066,0.0038439296,0.0037899164,0.001216596],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008194341,0.0010389189,0.05900762,0.0026461168,0.0010046544,0.00380881,0.0076364623,0.0038816878,0.008536396,0.6317907,0.021093505,0.2513607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086306734,0.0029040459,0.04406217,0.00043481126,0.00039209556,0.00281117,0.0049649263,0.020461442,0.0071018264,0.8803162,0.035538223,0.00014995786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010047404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005430997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043611586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014969491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016058335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1458953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390063898","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001299","title":"Carport and carpet: Effects of compound and pseudocompound word structures on typing.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morpheme; Typing; Linguistics; Word (group theory); Computer science; Compound; Chunking (psychology); Priming (agriculture); Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Communication; Psychology; Speech recognition; Biology","score_opus":0.031062203541731778,"score_gpt":0.34075800213429736,"score_spread":0.3096957985925656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390063898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823203,0.00038730472,0.0013640382,0.0002591282,0.00022289153,0.00011924632,0.0005261316,0.00025500837,0.014545994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97710484,0.00033836626,0.0039812922,0.00051081186,0.00006498575,0.00026929574,0.0009190769,0.0005822297,0.016229164],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984995,0.0004607111,0.00019038284,0.00041121553,0.0003521901,0.00008605074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968543,0.023739494,0.003438903,0.0022696652,0.0006612085,0.0013476124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019449976,0.00067288167,0.00062905013,0.00050649565,0.0004883089,0.0028300202,0.0010844175,0.0011974769,0.028616618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03811405,0.00066985015,0.0004842436,0.0003534346,0.00092282443,0.0031319642,0.0014884045,0.0013887031,0.0026848272],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.17981336,0.006840252,0.07304967,0.002839114,0.0010283414,0.004368236,0.006164699,0.00520373,0.43106884,0.00995107,0.015334488,0.26433814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042430353,0.014762474,0.7715601,0.00079967873,0.001666462,0.004627691,0.0031331927,0.032104466,0.10757612,0.040962413,0.018128842,0.0004354571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023528882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021490087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028616618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057118287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006195554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09573209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391531592","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001325.supp","title":"Supplemental Material for Reading Proficiency Predicts Spatial Eye-Movement Control in the First and Second Language","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Eye movement; Movement (music); Control (management); Movement control; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Physical medicine and rehabilitation; Medicine; Physics; Acoustics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009260494628529686,"score_gpt":0.29582226035326437,"score_spread":0.2865617657247347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391531592","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03958124,0.00024244732,0.0067309733,0.0018595174,0.00079893676,0.001043853,0.92944413,0.0028370307,0.017461812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12866168,0.0007759493,0.03631998,0.002201008,0.00094307435,0.008012769,0.72815996,0.0018133312,0.09311226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973994,0.000038138995,0.00005264632,0.00006548467,0.00006416617,0.00003957493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98373497,0.010954456,0.00094409497,0.0010080074,0.0027003693,0.00065805635],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082378206,0.0018509184,0.0011328505,0.002473689,0.0010114388,0.0011391541,0.0017092216,0.0017515962,0.67649114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013871487,0.0007943579,0.0008796221,0.0015236442,0.0001864082,0.0014337165,0.00085330097,0.0009678146,0.098298974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015641345,0.0052327234,0.025138484,0.0014624959,0.0002836281,0.00026295203,0.00033444905,0.00063864543,0.0030117498,0.0022840288,0.885662,0.0741247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051364116,0.004234478,0.56418186,0.0026571476,0.00076584,0.002886771,0.0015901501,0.010274734,0.013472204,0.03992253,0.35427314,0.00060482253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015215077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020549135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67649114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006382981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011305845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4614461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391643200","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001325","title":"Reading proficiency predicts spatial eye-movement control in the first and second language.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Eye movement; Reading (process); PsycINFO; Psychology; Eye tracking; Psycholinguistics; Cognitive psychology; Control (management); Linguistics; Movement (music); Word recognition; Cognition; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.011146264838897182,"score_gpt":0.33099492936719027,"score_spread":0.3198486645282931,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391643200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99810505,0.000110841065,0.00012884424,0.00003849413,0.0000025242482,0.0000046687105,0.0001741282,0.000008722774,0.0014267677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99900144,0.000053226588,0.000107939326,0.000009465965,0.0000020639764,0.000005864847,0.00022473284,0.000005871288,0.0005894886],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975616,0.000047846643,0.000030117562,0.000080154954,0.000051752617,0.000033996657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890589,0.006096736,0.0032186024,0.00058004115,0.0005194192,0.0005264388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063297455,0.00029836694,0.0002124852,0.0007297981,0.00018612244,0.001123734,0.00025809868,0.0005897847,0.007117768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011534106,0.00017974345,0.00019617629,0.00050035137,0.0004728436,0.0007711363,0.00042184285,0.00047121348,0.0014697453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017395928,0.00010142989,0.98814654,0.000026162379,0.000049610746,0.00013276067,0.0011151687,0.00014566745,0.003769149,0.00012485957,0.00017970726,0.006034919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023565945,0.00006544501,0.9988373,0.0000044181766,0.0000064294027,0.00012560944,0.0002864317,0.00025009454,0.00020357105,0.00012826423,0.00008752134,0.0000025880424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040173386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00571766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007117768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017794438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018322362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02381134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392058452","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001327","title":"On the nature of action–sentence compatibility effects.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compatibility (geochemistry); Sentence; Embodied cognition; Comprehension; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Psychology; Sentence processing; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.0447354676789827,"score_gpt":0.39341459935941014,"score_spread":0.34867913168042747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392058452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8400345,0.002392443,0.040578306,0.0018279337,0.0003419069,0.000566136,0.0010141643,0.00042247216,0.11282213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98756963,0.000425527,0.009095006,0.0006144283,0.00017310974,0.00049108156,0.0003211354,0.00015263425,0.0011575542],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970788,0.0008922302,0.00027484575,0.0006852975,0.0009825339,0.00008635384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8879906,0.098731875,0.0063001527,0.0045772297,0.001520662,0.00087957014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068332204,0.00048866554,0.0004365903,0.0013775101,0.00047360506,0.0014116587,0.0008097116,0.0012692261,0.015026608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07797029,0.0004557838,0.00058300974,0.00074447086,0.0022024394,0.0053799064,0.0021368535,0.0015177203,0.00075705483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01825365,0.0014312124,0.08129594,0.004204626,0.00074837846,0.0020260788,0.009189912,0.0035122843,0.384764,0.2201872,0.003690547,0.27069628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010510107,0.0031763772,0.7056557,0.00048548213,0.0008316205,0.002730471,0.0016821808,0.012358662,0.052309968,0.21078455,0.008752945,0.00018109613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031517327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033857653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015026608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038333292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034438336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050269008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393039750","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001328","title":"Socialness effects in lexical–semantic processing.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Calgary; Hotchkiss Brain Institute; McGill University; Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Concreteness; Psychology; Lexical decision task; Noun; Semantics (computer science); Cognitive psychology; Semantic memory; PsycINFO; Task (project management); Verb; Meaning (existential); Natural language processing; Computer science; Cognition; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.028307609516256667,"score_gpt":0.36471761294303906,"score_spread":0.3364100034267824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393039750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99281377,0.00017786465,0.00047045446,0.00008223338,0.00001296726,0.000012570385,0.000109243454,0.000022952981,0.006297919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99818075,0.000072926145,0.0007977509,0.000058187718,0.000014786414,0.000013912424,0.000090150585,0.000026885707,0.00074462383],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995938,0.00012834386,0.00003764755,0.000113090806,0.00010067535,0.00002646874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959876,0.0023173594,0.0010144133,0.0002809878,0.00012279791,0.000276891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060595036,0.0003415981,0.00017600098,0.00032336835,0.00019439934,0.00067814876,0.00015950532,0.0003137896,0.0055425107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005410532,0.00015840873,0.00019759475,0.00013518315,0.00054617785,0.0008260683,0.0006615631,0.0003318954,0.00027489278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004460016,0.00055959297,0.09906168,0.00040783666,0.00022955531,0.0012870043,0.0027898382,0.00050326996,0.82284707,0.0032677213,0.00065082585,0.06393563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006568112,0.00074773893,0.9697604,0.000032967975,0.00010014382,0.0007036016,0.00058974855,0.0015282499,0.021681484,0.0034311218,0.0013376992,0.000021215625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005954314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012411932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055425107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026257808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017881607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018541574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399970715","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001360","title":"Changing-state irrelevant speech disrupts visual–verbal but not visual–spatial serial recall.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fundação Bial; Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst; German Academic Exchange Service London; University of Central Lancashire","keywords":"Distraction; Recall; Amodal perception; Psychology; Serial position effect; Cognitive psychology; Short-term memory; Modality effect; Visual perception; Visual short-term memory; Task (project management); Free recall; Perception; Visual memory; Working memory; Cognition","score_opus":0.035300085168321435,"score_gpt":0.36903551720564937,"score_spread":0.3337354320373279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399970715","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972325,0.00006553851,0.00060603564,0.00004720476,0.000068440015,0.000079879224,0.0001650949,0.000053204647,0.0016819825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99564195,0.000076184384,0.0015114491,0.00010151405,0.000033318982,0.00024054159,0.00025998132,0.000047251437,0.002087739],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925095,0.00014568394,0.0001245748,0.00021854698,0.00016721713,0.000092999995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960141,0.002434501,0.0004940414,0.00059677113,0.00009819347,0.00036235203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008645123,0.00035195562,0.00056069874,0.0002821858,0.00024763722,0.0005065775,0.00058485003,0.00062962924,0.011663027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004766365,0.00035674425,0.00019507541,0.00015262769,0.0008168985,0.0006436227,0.00095248525,0.0010816117,0.00081092614],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.066460595,0.011240067,0.010386058,0.00065170834,0.00024966695,0.00036436695,0.0014106344,0.0003863924,0.83838147,0.0012979599,0.0019644299,0.06720662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0069966675,0.06482087,0.40621158,0.00016104763,0.00072338333,0.0018492511,0.0012014983,0.009008063,0.49331763,0.0065067573,0.009013412,0.00018981921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005831145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094557356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011663027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000215567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002714063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039016664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400982138","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001358","title":"Markers of musical expertise in a sight-reading task: An eye-tracking study.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche","keywords":"Psychology; Eye movement; Sight; Cognitive psychology; Reading (process); Eye tracking; Fixation (population genetics); Perception; Task (project management); Linguistics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04853831860480758,"score_gpt":0.43873698995170146,"score_spread":0.3901986713468939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400982138","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994795,0.00003637537,0.0002091117,0.000005986972,0.0000012107905,0.00000988348,0.00003996714,0.0000043486793,0.00021360873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868447,0.000036241043,0.0005117922,0.000020909218,0.000002564316,0.000014919392,0.00008580729,0.0000029933408,0.00064009085],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997249,0.00004400142,0.000024100947,0.00010304683,0.00006764295,0.00003629866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979157,0.00074421597,0.0006803434,0.00018973334,0.00027799426,0.00019199714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057502784,0.0002684406,0.0002909423,0.00050230225,0.00020695063,0.000372146,0.00023181834,0.00046108323,0.0012195227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030412495,0.00018464841,0.000126335,0.00020903112,0.0003316098,0.0004740061,0.00039337788,0.00033770502,0.00024108909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021606996,0.002660834,0.4334802,0.00017988168,0.00011881088,0.0007882035,0.007933078,0.00033034512,0.50927323,0.00015338261,0.00030942564,0.042611934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019567547,0.0011112819,0.99247205,0.0000038100775,0.00001944655,0.00031247165,0.0005609146,0.00045044688,0.004748819,0.000067339344,0.0002246221,0.000009157796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004196665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067120637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004196665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018238695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013827214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008344471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402277371","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001378","title":"Semantic access to ambiguous word roots cannot be stopped by affixation—Not even in sentence contexts: Evidence from eye-tracking and the maze task.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University; McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Sentence; Task (project management); Word (group theory); Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Eye tracking; Semantics (computer science); Cognition; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Computer science; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.053856982275137605,"score_gpt":0.39472311689854156,"score_spread":0.340866134623404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402277371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99164975,0.00020679325,0.0026513948,0.00009428354,0.000028045923,0.000014448539,0.00038997835,0.000059353177,0.004906038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914274,0.0002843491,0.004858536,0.00014916719,0.000012134617,0.000048513382,0.0006231654,0.00007389321,0.00252283],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997143,0.000029985646,0.000034368713,0.00010665646,0.00008188568,0.000032828462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721414,0.0010080494,0.0010992524,0.0003706382,0.00015974538,0.00014818934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071233977,0.00029220685,0.0002711303,0.00033695504,0.0003152409,0.00069344055,0.00046473325,0.0005349613,0.0031135932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043415553,0.00031046278,0.00013821111,0.00020260624,0.001063677,0.0014422821,0.00096677593,0.00061990484,0.0006333273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010439033,0.00009020864,0.007941689,0.00018011291,0.000036859357,0.00033240448,0.0007246716,0.000059427064,0.96582085,0.0011397619,0.00050530635,0.02212483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023828453,0.0010044618,0.6310307,0.0001216625,0.00012920979,0.0031389596,0.0007663838,0.0024534515,0.3473879,0.008996547,0.0046473485,0.00008510568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016370354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038121443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031135932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001893576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029476764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010416031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407504823","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001433","title":"The relationship between language experience variables and the time course of spoken word recognition.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Discourse Analysis and Cultural Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Coactivation; Vocabulary; Word recognition; Cognitive psychology; Phonology; Spoken language; Linguistics; Vocabulary development; Semantics (computer science); Reading (process); Computer science","score_opus":0.04326101781053505,"score_gpt":0.4025151022774537,"score_spread":0.35925408446691864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407504823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971117,0.00029735762,0.0008645879,0.000036817837,0.000007112357,0.000014770943,0.0003831397,0.000011284652,0.0012731153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803597,0.00012048716,0.00052688,0.000017052636,0.000005677681,0.00003610102,0.0003689756,0.000010781726,0.0008780835],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994748,0.00015333384,0.000041957614,0.00019348694,0.000091813024,0.000044559158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859207,0.010691227,0.0021965571,0.00044935467,0.00031662485,0.0004254719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089533196,0.00019119671,0.00021549937,0.00045085826,0.00011880326,0.0006392609,0.00028789218,0.0004116934,0.0054096803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011576403,0.0001420258,0.00020067632,0.00046649043,0.00025932977,0.00048403334,0.0004972092,0.0005281073,0.00035334393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009552453,0.00020266407,0.95900977,0.00010115992,0.00023092025,0.00016736034,0.0015019428,0.00025947148,0.012180486,0.00015979416,0.00014604376,0.025085177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014558794,0.00014598711,0.99896777,0.0000048422385,0.000017168551,0.00006452686,0.00013851552,0.00020122487,0.00028998085,0.00003933179,0.00012597533,0.000003226306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002077997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030536097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054096803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021144924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018910499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018097222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407505219","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001439","title":"Disrupted orientation after path integration by absence of anticipated prevalent spatial views.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Spatial Cognition and Navigation","field":"Engineering","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Innovates","keywords":"Landmark; Heading (navigation); Path integration; Psychology; Homing (biology); Orientation (vector space); Object (grammar); Artificial intelligence; Computer vision; Communication; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Geography; Geodesy; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.014343274874838404,"score_gpt":0.3221481263155652,"score_spread":0.30780485144072683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407505219","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942437,0.00014082187,0.004851116,0.000030072511,0.000024167928,0.000015085269,0.00005670845,0.000102437196,0.00053600007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972378,0.00005742941,0.0021655224,0.000029359639,0.0000028798593,0.00002051203,0.00010268691,0.000023265176,0.0003605958],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996823,0.000035310015,0.000029075265,0.00010606181,0.00008654003,0.00006072128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911493,0.0001864811,0.00029236014,0.00024100617,0.000059659753,0.00010550802],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002632948,0.00045320473,0.0003336908,0.00014770348,0.00011135336,0.00040876004,0.00025461262,0.0003463619,0.0016424498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025043634,0.0003145681,0.00022384452,0.00009719397,0.0005010835,0.00048057636,0.0009003158,0.00067136774,0.00019348194],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012876941,0.00012394767,0.008387928,0.00014793257,0.000050553,0.00036591655,0.00048797342,0.0006161078,0.9666452,0.00033181036,0.0001917688,0.02136304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030633336,0.009117209,0.54485375,0.00006329545,0.00032088306,0.004396742,0.0010118767,0.0077274623,0.42247367,0.0036433884,0.0059793578,0.00010603078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011035637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017336137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016424498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017498777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030911746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0054944754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407505400","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001438","title":"Tracking the dynamic word-by-word incremental reading through multimeasures.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Word (group theory); Psychology; Reading (process); Word recognition; Linguistics; Word length; Cognitive psychology; Word lists by frequency; Natural language processing; Computer science; Sentence","score_opus":0.02199783729644601,"score_gpt":0.36202037051378916,"score_spread":0.34002253321734316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407505400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89804244,0.0006329261,0.08348607,0.00026799954,0.000105638996,0.00028938003,0.0006492598,0.0009003267,0.015625846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95096695,0.00027725947,0.045525406,0.00010542638,0.000024827425,0.00022019567,0.000340895,0.00014179407,0.0023971593],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948287,0.000102960585,0.000028278031,0.00024498926,0.00011831348,0.000022583903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951774,0.002852095,0.00089391955,0.0007746971,0.00018629433,0.00011568106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009724272,0.00029234673,0.00022946557,0.00048506196,0.00017685928,0.0010642796,0.0005677509,0.0004454296,0.0054452317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012107228,0.0003218229,0.00016844383,0.00042104194,0.000671632,0.003058734,0.0010217158,0.00070807745,0.0008398092],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011554686,0.000613261,0.032791037,0.00097412453,0.00016339854,0.0003788787,0.0044538276,0.0021042775,0.4598851,0.018616395,0.0027973154,0.4760669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013549742,0.003582919,0.7582329,0.00018218327,0.00025999988,0.0016672588,0.0016310762,0.043698516,0.09397433,0.08413452,0.012325052,0.00017576826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006661894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012610045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054452317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025827417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025846512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018216133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407505569","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001426","title":"Unpacking the sandwich: Which mechanisms underlie the increase in sandwich priming during word recognition?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Generalitat Valenciana","keywords":"Unpacking; Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Word (group theory); Cognitive psychology; Word recognition; Communication; Repetition priming; Cognition; Linguistics; Lexical decision task; Neuroscience; Reading (process)","score_opus":0.035124648099873625,"score_gpt":0.33479983408955105,"score_spread":0.2996751859896774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407505569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79136205,0.00464848,0.18331705,0.0016441001,0.0005198599,0.00045440582,0.00028537647,0.00072521553,0.017043415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9380175,0.001243983,0.057355683,0.0007653031,0.00015127134,0.00023673598,0.0001311306,0.00016241525,0.0019359796],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992962,0.0001555148,0.00006074508,0.00029914093,0.00013937984,0.000049056252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642193,0.0017926254,0.00074024516,0.00072613795,0.00020619202,0.00011284845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019242935,0.00046028508,0.00063851074,0.0004186103,0.00021581993,0.0007238273,0.0007707359,0.0008269677,0.004739717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006452329,0.00063316495,0.0006241338,0.0003292999,0.0010954634,0.0030479871,0.0010800435,0.0011567026,0.0008174377],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019946946,0.0002887631,0.010478918,0.0012800533,0.0001690058,0.0004555969,0.0020134223,0.0007688044,0.7875092,0.018596455,0.0011019128,0.17534316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073633523,0.0036060442,0.39983615,0.0005573399,0.000989252,0.0061379084,0.0011347019,0.028210089,0.4260954,0.12062563,0.011818561,0.000252657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030052208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040714204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004739717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031880883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035477156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015855968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407702331","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001468","title":"A “logical intuition” based on semantic associations.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Semantic Web and Ontologies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Intuition; Cognitive psychology; Cognitive science; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.02536433466529716,"score_gpt":0.337574565768305,"score_spread":0.3122102311030079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407702331","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5434446,0.0017426789,0.22915962,0.013246812,0.0007281168,0.0004713178,0.0008611084,0.0005734676,0.20977236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9710863,0.0003471463,0.024085402,0.0015808847,0.00006969993,0.000103948114,0.00036891032,0.000034163182,0.0023234321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953725,0.0020168365,0.00032225036,0.00077304436,0.0013482916,0.00016703148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816244,0.010103224,0.0035244417,0.0023461531,0.0018087836,0.0005929501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003719303,0.0003481222,0.00024253558,0.0010954186,0.0006823497,0.0027994064,0.0006250291,0.0014253564,0.007730734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04398434,0.00026314647,0.00072576443,0.00058041577,0.0053480756,0.006040229,0.0023914909,0.0024442552,0.000815324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011333913,0.00056196045,0.076975994,0.0020204026,0.00052344595,0.000943609,0.026358383,0.0037391284,0.038962856,0.6584003,0.018344233,0.17203635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011058205,0.00076584175,0.0999176,0.0007378752,0.0003427481,0.0025374223,0.009268967,0.014796427,0.00814939,0.8042125,0.058964048,0.00019660962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075680274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094782223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007730734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009850458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009376978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02586186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407702610","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001454","title":"Anchors and ratios to quantify and explain y-axis distortion effects in graphs.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Advanced Graph Neural Networks","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Distortion (music); Cognitive psychology; Physics","score_opus":0.011842650518591616,"score_gpt":0.32061077833882473,"score_spread":0.3087681278202331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407702610","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26258793,0.006398452,0.6660823,0.0020255183,0.0007570856,0.00084127195,0.002552087,0.0026278484,0.05612746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88222927,0.0009935903,0.113291055,0.00023441405,0.00014356364,0.00039770018,0.00074641145,0.0003147874,0.0016492596],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768937,0.0009805589,0.00020978111,0.00037071513,0.0006833538,0.00006621382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.954112,0.031077405,0.008446016,0.003574676,0.0023396306,0.00045031417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055488036,0.0013310044,0.00042444214,0.0033190933,0.00034687822,0.0016877982,0.00091777416,0.000860182,0.017218167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09133005,0.0003479387,0.000947941,0.0026531452,0.0014277202,0.006469672,0.0013576645,0.0012555759,0.0012955274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001512993,0.00028218987,0.10963502,0.0025800823,0.00060492224,0.0005929375,0.0060923663,0.015950557,0.020706907,0.26669717,0.013155705,0.56218916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003486919,0.001236236,0.32979113,0.0011854862,0.00069983624,0.0021058084,0.0032624137,0.14591496,0.011984665,0.46580377,0.037317876,0.0003491211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012351661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014738062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017218167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001012195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004494482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0576005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409541473","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001489","title":"Inverted list-strength effects in recognition.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.02278238681894016,"score_gpt":0.35131420622812665,"score_spread":0.32853181940918647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409541473","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9527402,0.002042193,0.029244443,0.00045574305,0.00013616844,0.0001324637,0.0004244048,0.0004599171,0.014364484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98806995,0.00027090247,0.008858344,0.00039075562,0.000040836978,0.00005253247,0.00019791165,0.00007725779,0.0020414663],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986015,0.00027245193,0.00012183804,0.00039972138,0.00052454515,0.00008010347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9894386,0.0064500603,0.0011256752,0.0019222178,0.00059710565,0.00046637558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020740565,0.00051321165,0.00042353253,0.00072703674,0.0002141857,0.00080627913,0.00076997397,0.0006283883,0.0069483314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011733161,0.00046110584,0.0008216344,0.00029786048,0.0013630925,0.0022981,0.001908959,0.001293949,0.00075992546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041570654,0.0004365172,0.03418208,0.0007278107,0.00030260862,0.00045113807,0.0010565475,0.0021902653,0.7884156,0.014236104,0.0007729417,0.15307128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048702865,0.006966577,0.55498797,0.0001019169,0.00072034687,0.0031225036,0.00032673212,0.020394405,0.34459826,0.062024612,0.006017527,0.00025195416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007229714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007730563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069483314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053990865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027489962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02324444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410003366","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001488","title":"The role of declarative and procedural learning in adolescent emergent reading.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Jacobs Family Foundation; Society for Research in Child Development","keywords":"Psychology; Procedural memory; Declarative memory; Reading (process); Cognitive psychology; Procedural knowledge; Cognition; Developmental psychology; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Neuroscience; Knowledge base","score_opus":0.017544196072976158,"score_gpt":0.3497415600171845,"score_spread":0.33219736394420835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410003366","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99965227,0.000065163906,0.000009772044,0.00001381029,7.562281e-7,0.0000024750568,0.000036299727,0.000001172892,0.0002182812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995103,0.00006737968,0.000049954797,0.000007719502,6.230163e-7,0.000004511222,0.00005210741,7.9185696e-7,0.0003066006],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999798,0.000033472425,0.00002072041,0.00004379004,0.000046776262,0.00005733449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816775,0.00036417905,0.00084143685,0.000066465225,0.0002702145,0.0002899689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000652969,0.00034012247,0.00024445762,0.0006442625,0.0004091156,0.0008622614,0.00045143822,0.00036098697,0.0012808163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027092693,0.00024049172,0.00012895829,0.00029147536,0.00050223834,0.0005147733,0.0005716654,0.00064910686,0.00023774043],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010380607,0.00048805008,0.9831163,0.000043408545,0.000014568732,0.0006363552,0.005015564,0.000049672173,0.002248998,0.00008695336,0.000097674536,0.008098658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000283313,0.0001834227,0.9970229,0.000012937715,0.0000079842675,0.00026625177,0.0020121378,0.00005256617,0.00025594322,0.000046031062,0.00013504455,0.0000020968237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02678218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057704058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02678218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004995198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000635332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053252578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410093647","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001490","title":"Attend to compete or compete to attend: The possible role of attention in processing competing stimuli within visual working memory.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Working memory; Cognition; Visual perception; Visual attention; Cognitive science; Perception; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.04379360672728362,"score_gpt":0.41905163059875156,"score_spread":0.37525802387146795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410093647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9545152,0.0031146368,0.010290645,0.0011651296,0.00034838275,0.00014870697,0.00066144665,0.0000973473,0.029658532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99235827,0.00043393014,0.0037137119,0.00043033942,0.00010116064,0.00010054949,0.00024812252,0.00005022594,0.0025637248],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996536,0.00006205982,0.000020609546,0.00009676155,0.000119528224,0.000047402114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551684,0.0030189087,0.00072221045,0.00035938827,0.00014540929,0.00023727422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000822883,0.0002256006,0.00027539962,0.0003319533,0.00026216308,0.0013005461,0.0011113542,0.00065101846,0.01019935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013453497,0.00019758174,0.0002746256,0.00038755278,0.0007005552,0.0023677836,0.0009615302,0.0007903874,0.0004701239],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006975919,0.00080974377,0.09343942,0.0016563595,0.0004185703,0.0013417262,0.003458457,0.0014727529,0.48805872,0.03257182,0.010121269,0.3596752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034673122,0.0012678705,0.89567673,0.00028973073,0.00038482712,0.0011905691,0.0008765586,0.010376608,0.028685825,0.053878818,0.0069460585,0.000079746584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026132343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038872913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01019935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044975552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003467521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034120202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412006229","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001504","title":"Distinctiveness and interference in free recall: A test with the production effect.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Optimal distinctiveness theory; Psychology; Free recall; Recall; Test (biology); Cognitive psychology; Production (economics); Interference (communication); Recall test; Experimental psychology; Cognition; Communication; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.013952815486781261,"score_gpt":0.33187860282934994,"score_spread":0.3179257873425687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412006229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890159,0.0006116941,0.007365444,0.00016128595,0.000071521754,0.0001530528,0.00018939194,0.000072782386,0.0023589456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943135,0.00009305339,0.0037400983,0.00022522458,0.000049269085,0.00020157795,0.00021822,0.000028924936,0.0011301002],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756795,0.00065194356,0.00026096584,0.0006790425,0.00069785025,0.00014230463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971031,0.01793727,0.0044027832,0.005112227,0.00072316546,0.00079357415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049890657,0.00081531005,0.0006653072,0.00055924966,0.00027512535,0.00084922503,0.0013047737,0.0010944777,0.0047611836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018885156,0.00047661285,0.00081246643,0.00027657367,0.0014563133,0.0019948455,0.0021839454,0.0018943578,0.0005007889],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04268888,0.0075233453,0.118920684,0.0012787076,0.0012226622,0.0009311921,0.0023439913,0.0011849103,0.67936796,0.0040142573,0.0008127166,0.1397107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025910717,0.044508535,0.7097612,0.00006372489,0.00097318215,0.0023314431,0.00047552842,0.009459686,0.21323472,0.013486329,0.0029549797,0.00015960123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062038744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048785782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049890657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040737618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038340213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026385069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412525088","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001523","title":"Testing the fluency account for truth judgments.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University; Simon Fraser University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Fluency; Cognitive psychology; Verbal fluency test; Processing fluency; Cognition; Neuropsychology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.05513730745888318,"score_gpt":0.38839960906408644,"score_spread":0.33326230160520326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412525088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90194666,0.0006126449,0.048752785,0.0021919662,0.000357394,0.00043862322,0.00078087155,0.00026658503,0.044652507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98192596,0.00015772175,0.01335768,0.0006596277,0.00015952249,0.0004446373,0.00048453483,0.000110786896,0.0026995107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945787,0.0020463553,0.00040918152,0.0014287164,0.0012652512,0.00027181514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8694204,0.09982406,0.014834674,0.010618093,0.0033300184,0.001972741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008927165,0.00094305165,0.0006570497,0.00087515084,0.0007043496,0.0031337512,0.0014424936,0.0023994448,0.013670955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10377434,0.00050480367,0.0012180174,0.00047085044,0.0020645387,0.009237078,0.002022138,0.0020226452,0.0014143977],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024131423,0.0070840707,0.2796986,0.0026809277,0.0013807026,0.0018998533,0.011012593,0.015069086,0.082886,0.14274438,0.012197661,0.41921476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002952672,0.008280224,0.35711974,0.0004872346,0.0009840392,0.0035038898,0.0028292057,0.15400262,0.029330026,0.43026182,0.009783781,0.00046478192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021391292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012169257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013670955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015722533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00095345994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047211945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414341420","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001515","title":"Extending the maze task to Hungarian: New insights in relative clause processing.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Relative clause; Sentence processing; Task (project management); Sentence; Locality; Word order; Point (geometry); Task analysis; Cognition","score_opus":0.03136138734588994,"score_gpt":0.36248538056910556,"score_spread":0.3311239932232156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414341420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91080284,0.0015648399,0.056929037,0.0011342546,0.000115544215,0.00018776834,0.0010515291,0.00024148892,0.027972654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637397,0.000759256,0.031749886,0.0006158519,0.000051935483,0.00020614041,0.0006776753,0.0000801566,0.0021194862],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976414,0.00008960596,0.00001835843,0.000067262205,0.00004330388,0.00001735928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793565,0.0014236205,0.00026392558,0.00023263315,0.000053780488,0.00009036099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008196778,0.00040774603,0.0003032381,0.00034113743,0.00015474315,0.0009410179,0.0006022126,0.00047529442,0.0035762326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005774103,0.00020655754,0.00022638495,0.00036646132,0.000792005,0.002558986,0.0010129841,0.00082230923,0.00034813565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027393256,0.0011088662,0.03763907,0.0017125439,0.00023828617,0.0019320213,0.0073868535,0.0017478511,0.45852026,0.039840683,0.0049797012,0.44215453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061607495,0.004161638,0.6202166,0.0005083479,0.00039728108,0.006624545,0.0046319715,0.028394228,0.07025528,0.22898084,0.034938958,0.0002741582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006234902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013192584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035762326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019575923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028725257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0119636655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414874392","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001536","title":"The transmission of semantic, lexical, and orthographic information in young and older bilinguals’ typed word production.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Facilitation; Orthographic projection; Word (group theory); Contrast (vision); Semantics (computer science); Meaning (existential); Lexical access","score_opus":0.012078197464252151,"score_gpt":0.3305961555155427,"score_spread":0.3185179580512906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414874392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99895585,0.00014401927,0.00004896211,0.0000108580625,0.0000029028006,0.0000035046094,0.000046065492,0.0000025141753,0.0007853095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99892515,0.00008664669,0.00010757265,0.000017400182,0.0000031426287,0.0000064990463,0.00007936722,0.0000029995554,0.00077115226],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998821,0.000013880972,0.000010762494,0.00003317485,0.000033726596,0.000026366339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993728,0.00013618103,0.00018851068,0.00004501493,0.00009934108,0.00015823616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033271624,0.00018355674,0.0001306205,0.00042705968,0.00019487555,0.00040396338,0.00011663917,0.00026213433,0.0022413651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015414951,0.00017667185,0.00010850261,0.000103702805,0.00031080897,0.0004918393,0.00031581905,0.0002337836,0.00042348958],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037377123,0.00046838642,0.3264241,0.00022521411,0.00006580177,0.002901568,0.012990284,0.0000739241,0.6048547,0.0004960134,0.00048537762,0.04727694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002014916,0.00028693595,0.99341995,0.00000860402,0.000015191177,0.00083585357,0.0007862124,0.00007856499,0.0039992305,0.00014051158,0.0004012399,0.000007545235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006778969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010523076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006778969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002706414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002599385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013478994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415247058","doi":"10.1037/xlm0001533","title":"Early morpho-orthographic and semantic effects in word recognition: Evidence from a foveal-splitting dichoptic paradigm with anaglyphs.","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition","topic":"Categorization, perception, and language","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Morpheme; Semantics (computer science); Word (group theory); Word recognition; Lexical decision task; Visual Word; Task (project management); Visual perception; Word processing","score_opus":0.01784050331379628,"score_gpt":0.3189313818314336,"score_spread":0.30109087851763733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415247058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98774046,0.00068192434,0.004507853,0.00010493654,0.000059611975,0.00007949488,0.00023315162,0.00005274312,0.0065398565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869112,0.00051134126,0.00893936,0.00036168002,0.00004264338,0.00015811513,0.0002957317,0.000060836737,0.00271913],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996263,0.00009415808,0.000028880306,0.00011501632,0.00009105284,0.000044686436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820256,0.0011061191,0.00026939207,0.00012510426,0.00010177756,0.00019505755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058886636,0.00028426308,0.00019758721,0.00028514062,0.00018278511,0.0003686276,0.00030164674,0.00048956514,0.0048199636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021700377,0.0002748375,0.00015308111,0.00017487151,0.0006478077,0.0007211486,0.0005662779,0.0006037036,0.0005519739],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001210566,0.00013366879,0.0006292879,0.00014103447,0.00000773287,0.00005375646,0.00007532347,0.000013255717,0.9901445,0.00028511355,0.000097898584,0.00720782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005630572,0.005865107,0.26103625,0.000104040206,0.00012686645,0.0020993191,0.0003331427,0.0017089023,0.72337925,0.0024567791,0.0022901946,0.00003717392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004416849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010032491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048199636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018047693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021931884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016124368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}