{"meta":{"query_hash":"e030867b0ef5","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology"},"cohort_total":165,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":165,"exported":165,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e030867b0ef5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Experimental+Social+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1119084953","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009","title":"Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Replicate; Ambiguity; Replication (statistics); Psychology; Robustness (evolution); Meta-analysis; Research design; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Management science; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.9675545174065701,"score_gpt":0.7654175320638141,"score_spread":0.20213698534275593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1119084953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97762406,0.0036536483,0.0002761768,0.0040538986,0.00034117806,0.00021802621,0.0000021067822,6.455253e-7,0.013830273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780667,0.0000093822055,0.0012514739,0.00021440831,0.00028592473,0.000004200062,3.9424603e-7,0.0000038355306,0.00042373338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745193,0.015078855,0.005913017,0.00038858887,0.0039467155,0.00015352854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98960644,0.002319143,0.0049698097,0.0009327394,0.0020877032,0.00008415463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2362787,0.00007830277,0.0010062528,0.00016943256,0.00016069878,0.000118583564,0.00084589585,0.000066923654,0.00025423066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038302492,0.000034617406,0.0003567573,0.00061588426,0.0003827069,0.0001255192,0.000096933996,0.0002182552,0.000042822707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010751672,0.00040549968,0.0072544734,0.000009661419,0.00038342545,0.000008744589,0.0981173,0.000016381391,0.21370588,0.013739978,0.6134648,0.051818717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011420496,0.009885092,0.10283421,0.00017263663,0.0003430326,0.00080606056,0.5082311,0.0019558214,0.01806548,0.15535681,0.19035119,0.0005780456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008342647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.5244786e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42311358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038513797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006493962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96979827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1442152979","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.005","title":"The robustness of the win–win effect","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medal; Earnings; Robustness (evolution); Inequality; Per capita; Demographic economics; Population; Gender equality; Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Economics; Geography; Sociology; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics; Accounting; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0572680450239155,"score_gpt":0.32581186614852276,"score_spread":0.2685438211246073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1442152979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801264,0.004270382,0.000111273934,0.0016112202,0.0033457056,0.000073888696,0.0000051944285,0.000001931211,0.010454034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988324,0.00006260071,0.000024991758,0.00021855974,0.00059721846,0.0000019503264,2.946435e-7,0.00000944314,0.0002525341],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990877,0.000031250762,0.00057234056,0.00008938231,0.00006685333,0.00015251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989133,0.000031059146,0.0008134465,0.00014555917,0.00004763308,0.000048991235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009545491,0.00008259854,0.000297215,0.00004671247,0.00014420447,0.000022019281,0.00036920977,0.000076865945,0.00008855221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038063077,0.000051131417,0.00021490642,0.00013809474,0.00018944977,0.00007915459,0.000042788655,0.00017947066,0.000012497694],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025482613,0.0019169179,0.4863288,0.000037971924,0.001259307,0.00003536627,0.013845596,0.0023316396,0.0060098674,0.16631933,0.31097755,0.008389378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010670261,0.0035835586,0.42603123,0.000057772275,0.000067501955,0.00027043148,0.0036760934,0.0020875197,0.009303708,0.014546548,0.5289369,0.00076843734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021910646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003021037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21795939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063062136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021320913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20850787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967146094","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.004","title":"Victims versus perpetrators: Affective and empathic forecasting regarding transgressions in romantic relationships","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"University of Chicago; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Sadness; Psychology; Social psychology; Romance; Empathy; Marine transgression; Developmental psychology; Anger; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.11612031853295535,"score_gpt":0.46078451218818156,"score_spread":0.3446641936552262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967146094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9804674,0.0030917122,0.0005543056,0.0003347064,0.0030516894,0.00014941984,0.0000021632893,0.000013609226,0.012334997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987315,0.000016118167,0.00045063163,0.000055314344,0.00066488475,0.000011000715,0.0000029128337,0.00002382308,0.000043791933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982794,0.00054498686,0.000495109,0.00015875603,0.0001582212,0.00036354415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990584,0.0003519561,0.0003452844,0.00008103856,0.000037034904,0.0001262558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086133956,0.00015804854,0.00029086915,0.00027307234,0.00034130353,0.00001633018,0.00010648727,0.00033109973,0.00016182156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070507536,0.00014433595,0.00011593835,0.00025084356,0.00016630386,0.000328737,0.000022614171,0.0008699018,0.000014582117],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015205453,0.0011079997,0.87230027,0.0000074104664,0.0002669141,0.00006423309,0.10430879,0.000006645197,0.00512553,0.012517406,0.00072361605,0.0020506098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00829137,0.00083004317,0.93488723,0.000080416525,0.00011140851,0.00046028016,0.0536389,0.00009279046,0.00010120019,0.00064818916,0.00051507563,0.0003430881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008492913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009089818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06258694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001417831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001780546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5885849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968915972","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.003","title":"A smart unconscious? Procedural origins of automatic partner attitudes in marriage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Psychology; Social connectedness; Social psychology; Test (biology); Interpersonal communication; Developmental psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.03294097982514329,"score_gpt":0.462269998932842,"score_spread":0.4293290191076987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968915972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98703116,0.00022713402,0.000058945818,0.0007821708,0.0031548752,0.00018266027,0.0000036474614,0.000014407283,0.008545025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982577,0.000003924203,0.0007762925,0.00030148154,0.00038536722,0.0000141039045,0.0000029842631,0.000020966962,0.00023716794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983829,0.00015549967,0.0008005027,0.00017105759,0.00020568245,0.00028431343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901253,0.000082594706,0.0006120312,0.00014502907,0.0000672439,0.000080572456],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044147717,0.00016088886,0.00041103872,0.0002438808,0.000081573984,0.000011893494,0.00027786905,0.00031594737,0.0015932132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028772805,0.00013867431,0.00018942749,0.0002349593,0.00034731816,0.00013094708,0.000030943025,0.0006768239,0.000041483865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003903119,0.0026890624,0.8346299,0.000020177724,0.00025532607,0.000102993225,0.010760867,0.0000017645216,0.10639197,0.038286142,0.0050030537,0.0014684742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004215566,0.0006529818,0.9871418,0.00003147787,0.000043036656,0.0003129968,0.0021614155,0.000026758116,0.0008497658,0.0019222979,0.0023956902,0.0002462524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043630796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012553802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1525119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110241264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006944359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970395039","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1486","title":"Spontaneous Trait Associations and the Case of the Superstitious Banana","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Trait; Psychology; Social psychology; Associative property; Context (archaeology); Perception; Impression formation; Cognitive psychology; Social perception; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.09091430104588274,"score_gpt":0.3967145039717399,"score_spread":0.3058002029258572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970395039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9780771,0.0029654787,0.0000033768288,0.004351358,0.0010849847,0.0001245655,0.000024050929,0.000004149416,0.013364934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981868,0.000042789306,0.000017888093,0.0008785216,0.00034016726,0.000004117317,4.8713554e-7,0.000007660013,0.0005215268],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998867,0.00034988762,0.0003987906,0.00010474926,0.0001160043,0.00016360453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929494,0.00013054188,0.00037259562,0.000102452956,0.000057734742,0.00004172234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002129063,0.00010285403,0.00028572857,0.00003169382,0.00028538657,0.000017591537,0.00020534045,0.00011649858,0.0017228525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034034292,0.000054320913,0.00024925242,0.00010886385,0.0005301705,0.0000459353,0.000027993827,0.00024390289,0.0000062677564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021822832,0.004111034,0.00548777,0.000015352243,0.0025674847,0.009399799,0.4098627,0.0000024038134,0.041915968,0.26536116,0.21635887,0.042735185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0362739,0.0036566926,0.48760638,0.000065919085,0.0009213504,0.25958085,0.17788672,0.00008210031,0.0010240148,0.017646303,0.014277714,0.000978061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028705856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006978714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4821186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039506063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052683476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99918973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970992785","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.021","title":"A regulatory focus model of self-evaluation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Certainty; Social psychology; Self-esteem; Focus (optics); Perception; Focus group; Self-affirmation; Political science; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.11086443516665628,"score_gpt":0.48209143602053217,"score_spread":0.3712270008538759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970992785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96962816,0.0022681714,0.00029013897,0.00041939362,0.0013125095,0.00016712148,0.000008939409,0.000013729534,0.025891865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982839,0.0000033126207,0.0007799976,0.00017244843,0.0004890462,0.000018101884,0.0000032302314,0.000016863705,0.00023306298],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982361,0.00023837475,0.00084477384,0.00014289177,0.00030489577,0.00023293633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884146,0.000014269903,0.0007285631,0.00013416601,0.00021494277,0.000066607034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059076503,0.00011218702,0.0002975505,0.00016415276,0.00008906093,0.0000053610866,0.00017312932,0.00020879682,0.0012530297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004715148,0.00010991167,0.00030171694,0.00011921033,0.00012451987,0.000107077074,0.00001681759,0.00021835671,0.000024777402],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002557303,0.019470273,0.010414528,0.000021946273,0.000395049,0.000042194108,0.0132179735,0.00006344285,0.5100135,0.09278703,0.305009,0.046007756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0265877,0.008573559,0.86093247,0.00011691067,0.0006658274,0.0005654263,0.0074513736,0.00064549973,0.046415623,0.0404017,0.006631049,0.0010128546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000103671926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010288005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8505179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014378254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007105029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971708490","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.024","title":"When deserving translates into causing: The effect of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accident (philosophy); Psychology; Attribution; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Cognition; Mediation; Cognitive load; Moral reasoning; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.061337653470037966,"score_gpt":0.37796021070441627,"score_spread":0.3166225572343783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971708490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.989291,0.00018539067,0.000057499557,0.004012434,0.0023815965,0.00015681746,0.0000030656338,0.000008901625,0.0039032942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973368,0.00001284044,0.00012930011,0.0019294443,0.0005419106,0.000005893679,5.657736e-7,0.00001452344,0.000028740453],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834734,0.00035844606,0.00041306322,0.00022887636,0.00040961124,0.00024264879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873793,0.0005948954,0.00042205292,0.00010213747,0.00006508287,0.00007790273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006253479,0.00017130727,0.00030712798,0.00007462691,0.00032801265,0.000018490358,0.00032407104,0.00014346391,0.00020487982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003291514,0.00011345809,0.00020683488,0.00010588343,0.0005311294,0.00011906688,0.000040028506,0.00065931625,0.000017640843],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020114915,0.0003383181,0.00023120664,0.000008273317,0.000037867456,0.00006497564,0.0055934615,0.00000168074,0.98680395,0.00044913674,0.0011549667,0.0033046757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037988038,0.0039760764,0.0071433703,0.00011672551,0.0001218867,0.0006070867,0.0010906853,0.00001705048,0.98068434,0.0014768098,0.0007788652,0.00018829564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002091255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004315622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0080457805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051190735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027486107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46266866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973815765","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.009","title":"The hidden sides of self-esteem: Two dimensions of implicit self-esteem and their relation to narcissistic reactions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Self-esteem; Narcissism; Feeling; Social psychology; Implicit attitude; Relation (database); Attractiveness; Self; Implicit personality theory; Physical attractiveness; Personality; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.031284945032602554,"score_gpt":0.3765754367595175,"score_spread":0.34529049172691495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973815765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810305,0.0019466614,0.00013335668,0.0029913445,0.0013193915,0.00024398122,0.000027699027,0.000025094434,0.012281926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776113,0.000050011444,0.00095974084,0.00047774566,0.00051798293,0.000015578571,0.0000031608179,0.00002930129,0.00018537338],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975582,0.00045283104,0.0011244252,0.00029076,0.00021143952,0.00036238317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800247,0.00047701132,0.00093919784,0.00027081967,0.00018715918,0.00012336622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006612815,0.00022985035,0.00055136776,0.00019961497,0.0003346686,0.000017859431,0.00029500015,0.0002400253,0.00012386267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029678218,0.00015668308,0.00024627717,0.0002946788,0.0003281046,0.00009617863,0.00004979435,0.00036811855,0.000009809392],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018066292,0.0060002487,0.01088992,0.000024302632,0.0011655123,0.000038585513,0.030599365,0.000007764207,0.83627546,0.072965294,0.035353422,0.0048735123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054257377,0.0040293625,0.91319853,0.00006347914,0.00022305561,0.0014298657,0.012871096,0.0000064742785,0.0041799005,0.016609518,0.04148773,0.0004752712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020532192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033642154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007742495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044461605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.638935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974516241","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.015","title":"The consequences of faking anger in negotiations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":193,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Psychology; Negotiation; Social psychology; Perception; Sociology","score_opus":0.055421882302903215,"score_gpt":0.4199467660872307,"score_spread":0.36452488378432746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974516241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9337223,0.0006163497,0.000030974697,0.01224711,0.00075865595,0.00016622832,3.098614e-7,0.0000045306524,0.052453518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908245,0.00011696534,0.00006251467,0.00030382408,0.00026335896,0.0000061404394,2.0658271e-7,0.000003070832,0.00016146761],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903595,0.000212037,0.00034255986,0.000055854605,0.00020399073,0.0001496015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993498,0.00011990831,0.0003723739,0.000041182237,0.00008932635,0.00002741651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005179093,0.0000460777,0.00011900607,0.000084770785,0.00028464524,0.00003817346,0.00020868245,0.000057687972,0.0003927373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007289145,0.000035892084,0.00007313185,0.00020175186,0.00042741193,0.00023651413,0.000017159264,0.00009786803,0.000009669074],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018838463,0.0007961601,0.07634456,0.0000058415576,0.00018561968,0.0000123741975,0.19062425,0.000004770378,0.4143758,0.22421862,0.036957104,0.056286514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030858761,0.0007138306,0.67593926,0.000049205202,0.0000388003,0.000008652336,0.17010742,0.000014033326,0.011273974,0.034406215,0.10399384,0.00036890517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006545976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021896843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5995947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006215782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004308847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4300198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976556153","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.002","title":"Averted eye-gaze disrupts configural face encoding","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Gaze; Psychology; Encoding (memory); Cognitive psychology; Eye movement; Face perception; Eye tracking; Face (sociological concept); Perception; Social psychology; Neuroscience; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08031738985376341,"score_gpt":0.41386983656571025,"score_spread":0.33355244671194684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976556153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96303624,0.00004127761,0.00074161915,0.0015640195,0.0016815531,0.00007571879,0.000004310176,0.000023224224,0.03283205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545926,0.000027944794,0.000075972705,0.0036564446,0.00054689165,0.0000023908647,0.0000013427333,0.000013421298,0.00021632962],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869704,0.00030647838,0.000357067,0.0001776519,0.00023520655,0.0002265461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994443,0.000062849016,0.00028505627,0.000066552035,0.000037553677,0.00010367732],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020504203,0.00012148005,0.00023010922,0.00009315795,0.00019201379,0.000036320624,0.00019179496,0.00012291419,0.0016159192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010956179,0.00011009422,0.00015905996,0.000114774,0.00017483816,0.00020144654,0.000020861706,0.00026493918,0.0002227952],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012715993,0.00017880328,0.00012971007,0.0000015266224,0.0000052327705,0.000008852531,0.001836558,7.572247e-7,0.98977214,0.00049113756,0.0027232338,0.004724909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048248516,0.0013716718,0.017970039,0.000036003865,0.000021302738,0.0004736727,0.0034602347,0.00017921219,0.9333188,0.0011109028,0.03679956,0.00043377795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002903649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.9600444e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05645335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005919738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012761889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978668780","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.013","title":"An affirmed self and a better apology: The effect of self-affirmation on transgressors' responses to victims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Blame; Conflict resolution; Interpersonal relationship; Self-image; Interpersonal interaction; Self-disclosure; Belongingness","score_opus":0.012288816342634765,"score_gpt":0.37868810795774654,"score_spread":0.36639929161511176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978668780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946822,0.0002129959,0.0000504082,0.0023989377,0.0014741613,0.00027111964,0.0000042236843,0.00002572109,0.0008802478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985009,0.000007903091,0.00014890116,0.0009208566,0.00035452904,0.000023625067,0.0000014537065,0.000025690482,0.000016158749],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974299,0.0014258603,0.0004807044,0.00021179882,0.00019528599,0.0002564426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990392,0.00025431847,0.00036266452,0.00018994465,0.00004466952,0.00010924716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008513975,0.00019048234,0.00042765774,0.00019852359,0.0001846753,0.000015301863,0.0002660467,0.00033005662,0.00018979695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014748895,0.00012283251,0.000153389,0.00015350232,0.00019441255,0.00007775536,0.00001656062,0.00037212233,0.000024107034],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031280465,0.0053059547,0.044702724,0.000043141725,0.0014602835,0.00012820824,0.18127237,0.000016766258,0.68640864,0.0028518708,0.008962763,0.037566792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017306082,0.06312078,0.81122154,0.000089720415,0.00055183243,0.00091763475,0.0054556085,0.000023195049,0.086004026,0.00023011795,0.014402449,0.0006770283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000012829985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014267273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7665188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042486274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009839551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50089645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979521699","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.008","title":"Planning for the near and distant future: How does temporal distance affect task completion predictions?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Construals; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Task (project management); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Focus (optics); Construal level theory; Social psychology; Everyday life; Goal pursuit; Cognitive resource theory; Communication","score_opus":0.05653217320008444,"score_gpt":0.44726194419836807,"score_spread":0.39072977099828365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979521699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655512,0.0025438084,0.0053558177,0.011791552,0.013948461,0.00041515357,0.00008116244,0.000020043026,0.00029281963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647045,0.000010745966,0.00050565257,0.00044150717,0.0023483275,0.00006227389,0.000011204624,0.000017679236,0.00013218097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899477,0.000118250464,0.0003218724,0.00017687738,0.00012709269,0.00026114052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992232,0.00008282382,0.00039189085,0.00012615195,0.00006874213,0.00010721695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003843605,0.00013016323,0.0002361157,0.000045637957,0.00066034676,0.000062342784,0.00017505065,0.00017160377,0.0002479672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001255747,0.00008248137,0.00020073958,0.000076974684,0.00037627018,0.00012630847,0.000018993649,0.0005106164,0.000002746913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00938229,0.0043096757,0.104440175,0.000055800814,0.0006746807,0.00009490685,0.03155841,0.0000010205688,0.16435258,0.051807176,0.58190626,0.05141702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044655153,0.0027611887,0.5572034,0.0000321333,0.000100725265,0.00034543837,0.013398023,0.00003789371,0.00029936878,0.0006608896,0.4204392,0.00025617544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023010234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036858357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45276326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003505098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001893823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.507892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981075471","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.005","title":"Eyes on the prize: The longitudinal benefits of goal focus on progress toward a weight loss goal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism","keywords":"Psychology; Goal setting; Goal pursuit; Focus (optics); Goal orientation; Longitudinal study; Weight loss; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Obesity","score_opus":0.1562193337091087,"score_gpt":0.4489422929706129,"score_spread":0.29272295926150416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981075471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97072554,0.00211079,0.00001140462,0.006728719,0.0032254385,0.0003599481,0.000025184592,0.000012455534,0.01680051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777704,0.000025855337,0.00006327406,0.0009883131,0.0009013534,0.00006232382,0.0000013459771,0.000027336075,0.00015316826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976735,0.00044514023,0.00082854606,0.00024843492,0.00035567157,0.00044869795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985582,0.00008701349,0.0008173186,0.00028536507,0.0001282794,0.00012377807],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054160855,0.0002284651,0.0003981433,0.000115764,0.0002840294,0.000014400561,0.00067504315,0.00024105833,0.0029613299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000142040735,0.00013075677,0.0004854062,0.00018510273,0.0007271181,0.000079439735,0.000055382636,0.0007164001,0.00011416985],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02649556,0.03456909,0.09275716,0.000026173637,0.0013347408,0.00037628732,0.07382606,4.0664546e-7,0.0039389376,0.5017794,0.14570464,0.11919156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004243426,0.013343572,0.9619139,0.00011849197,0.00010195164,0.0003522211,0.0045463946,3.3498986e-7,0.009112681,0.0023670485,0.0036235028,0.00027650682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006958929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000915961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8691567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081284306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037061523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986276679","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.003","title":"Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Subliminal stimuli; Priming (agriculture); Attribution; Social psychology; Action (physics); Affect (linguistics); Communication","score_opus":0.09494325636184062,"score_gpt":0.3883624345882632,"score_spread":0.2934191782264226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986276679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99743986,0.00022288787,0.0006495855,0.00039354063,0.0008419855,0.00021956564,0.0000068808663,0.0000060851007,0.00021958684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823046,0.000028766719,0.0012586795,0.00028717687,0.00017299951,0.0000028090706,7.6992535e-7,0.00000884924,0.000009467479],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855417,0.00015052829,0.00061279803,0.00017581183,0.00028683155,0.0002198476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865216,0.00030037097,0.0008256989,0.000058098143,0.000085083986,0.00007859713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073570316,0.00011852389,0.00036110342,0.0001766675,0.000077532124,0.0000020380255,0.0001712518,0.00016301064,0.000009088263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008957551,0.0001069254,0.00016815698,0.00012572382,0.00017189939,0.00008662262,0.000026774816,0.00016437013,6.0644635e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020096006,0.0022577005,0.0012617083,0.000067775356,0.000044229873,0.000008461024,0.0016448514,3.8131287e-7,0.98772645,0.003498168,0.00024513426,0.0012355378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027188177,0.0035412493,0.15081097,0.00005641067,0.00003676234,0.000066629036,0.00014630202,0.0000018743615,0.84103894,0.0013497341,0.00015914338,0.000073174764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002475341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.8718158e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14954928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006406538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024941839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4360291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987247533","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.005","title":"Self-affirmation as a deliberate coping strategy: The moderating role of choice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Self-affirmation; Psychology; Social psychology; Coping (psychology); Psychological intervention; Everyday life; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04792404857337375,"score_gpt":0.4278791847146145,"score_spread":0.37995513614124077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987247533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90833145,0.0024922001,0.00007976005,0.0021474815,0.0015599551,0.00015731719,0.0000011595603,0.000020182028,0.085210465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556524,0.00007734673,0.0002833055,0.0013636663,0.0026364378,0.000007747523,7.5617675e-7,0.000013056635,0.00005244488],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797577,0.0006336078,0.0005729753,0.000101567945,0.00033206545,0.0003839942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998791,0.00014337138,0.00070919195,0.00007624075,0.00017282978,0.00010737736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009738579,0.000119387434,0.00027811556,0.00006596401,0.00063125015,0.00004064645,0.0003336023,0.0002066984,0.00029379976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000085587075,0.00009579568,0.0001845179,0.00021075008,0.00031264624,0.0005066058,0.00003092126,0.00029907087,0.00002343176],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004016524,0.0021245372,0.008054071,0.000011453483,0.00044399317,0.0000052782534,0.48747173,0.0000077966315,0.3571491,0.11842475,0.0111008845,0.014804755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0082301665,0.0036487323,0.07845431,0.00011667278,0.000292259,0.0003912772,0.5743251,0.00011223513,0.04681727,0.034473605,0.2517419,0.0013964757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029149491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000024584353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31033182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012850422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008712678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48551294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989142311","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.012","title":"Value from adversity: How we deal with adversity matters","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Anagrams; Anagram; Psychology; Feeling; Coping (psychology); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Clinical psychology; Task (project management)","score_opus":0.0919468500900882,"score_gpt":0.3282707576474577,"score_spread":0.23632390755736954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989142311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95640016,0.0004003627,0.00026009214,0.03867058,0.0015872633,0.00008369537,0.000016209344,0.000018593219,0.0025630272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828594,0.00003685624,0.0012968803,0.014676983,0.0009832322,0.000001431607,0.0000018681695,0.0000140732045,0.00012931488],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985071,0.00022896907,0.00022020547,0.00023211347,0.00039889678,0.0004127085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923486,0.00007009118,0.00034879477,0.0000973794,0.000026846681,0.00022205447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017016835,0.00017855769,0.00030362036,0.00010018267,0.00026345282,0.00001789116,0.00035559313,0.00014019452,0.00038447828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007691123,0.00014810982,0.00017079887,0.00012452505,0.00036314147,0.00048293782,0.00007187761,0.00034122198,0.00008637638],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019613397,0.0018495603,0.009491619,0.0000034031375,0.00012646063,0.00018443412,0.003797248,0.0000025689533,0.8671434,0.0011466157,0.112547964,0.0017453766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015208294,0.0034306103,0.38877413,0.00008914093,0.0002138884,0.0022356813,0.009156398,0.0000049935297,0.34778637,0.0027721538,0.2291287,0.0011996533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013881232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.079857e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.519357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013421026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020158075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6039743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990939807","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.016","title":"The perils of double consciousness: The role of thought suppression in stereotype threat","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Stereotype threat; Psychology; Stereotype (UML); Test (biology); Cognition; Social psychology; Thought suppression; Cognitive resource theory; Consciousness; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.044405415335225996,"score_gpt":0.4011112249627319,"score_spread":0.35670580962750587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990939807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94964087,0.0052101864,0.0000039627616,0.0026374988,0.0016989582,0.00017236479,0.0000022186207,0.000004797107,0.04062913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981199,0.0007991501,0.000030100886,0.00022639455,0.0006043504,0.0000075062544,3.6943175e-7,0.000010080857,0.00020214946],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979673,0.0005492152,0.000680883,0.00012646377,0.0003787579,0.000297389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987442,0.00022562046,0.000676803,0.00013634934,0.00016351962,0.000053532123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008572559,0.00011170528,0.00037371615,0.000073221396,0.000595462,0.000011501846,0.00064384687,0.00020200887,0.00022468404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005443693,0.00006765198,0.0002299217,0.00029468385,0.0021599333,0.00014146353,0.00005527667,0.00029593462,0.0000044516078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006190394,0.002110879,0.09740413,0.0000061813266,0.00026871552,0.000043165157,0.33304638,0.0000013954774,0.44311586,0.08508144,0.02056615,0.012165299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010315963,0.0025366857,0.23787512,0.00010397768,0.00006177618,0.00020984194,0.4043367,0.0000027694296,0.09306277,0.026137268,0.22483787,0.00051925925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060058857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002480086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35005307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007324671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000112303715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79583645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994012767","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.001","title":"Perpetrator groups can enhance their moral self-image by accepting their own intergroup apologies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Self-image","score_opus":0.04563872971101492,"score_gpt":0.38453511596027695,"score_spread":0.33889638624926205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994012767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801574,0.0032184336,0.00010161632,0.0012890738,0.005460265,0.00016551644,0.00003306232,0.00008183116,0.00949285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99763,0.00004681348,0.00033006427,0.00075144257,0.0009176054,0.000024546349,0.000011168217,0.000061826555,0.00022654133],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750197,0.00042235298,0.0008186881,0.00038698246,0.00024855495,0.000621439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985271,0.00005559921,0.0007661799,0.00023878699,0.00015929498,0.0002530097],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005101792,0.00037938618,0.0006536379,0.00016294996,0.00022331685,0.000062932326,0.0006839476,0.00053305784,0.00093646813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020701455,0.0002820559,0.00036578227,0.00023360986,0.00047244516,0.0002579516,0.000115912764,0.0008803144,0.000065219945],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016194788,0.004460172,0.007829136,0.0000091564625,0.0009251229,0.00035360726,0.12064322,7.771665e-7,0.7030444,0.0012392405,0.1463539,0.013521797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019548845,0.014241485,0.04711197,0.00014646011,0.00032128586,0.0033066166,0.59421664,0.000011593149,0.25094253,0.003351391,0.06398119,0.0028199756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000077427976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000067491264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47357345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028163992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065633045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001433886","doi":"10.1006/jesp.1999.1417","title":"What the Motivated Mind Sees: Comparing Friends' Perspectives to Married Partners' Views of Each Other","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Spouse; Virtue; Social psychology; Perception; Contrast (vision); Cognition; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08604302230514567,"score_gpt":0.49937270230716146,"score_spread":0.4133296800020158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001433886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9399016,0.002685942,0.0001782316,0.0020580208,0.0013517054,0.00023807932,0.0000033487627,0.000008296727,0.053574793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963878,0.0000346414,0.00021109404,0.0006067699,0.00050165615,0.000010562678,0.0000022559086,0.000025946316,0.0022193075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817544,0.0003989638,0.0006734574,0.00022504112,0.00023249135,0.00029458085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912715,0.00008398435,0.00041999764,0.00020035592,0.000072063114,0.000096429394],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041429859,0.00018729197,0.00042963246,0.00012668381,0.00022315767,0.000036120895,0.00036981684,0.00020244891,0.0065880823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007683651,0.00013578818,0.0002526928,0.00025559976,0.00032972803,0.00019390188,0.000028412938,0.00040243633,0.00012445991],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0051276707,0.004833397,0.08498634,0.000008081103,0.002157381,0.000057105644,0.7889061,0.00012557178,0.06441394,0.009798841,0.026206076,0.013379504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009706449,0.00283017,0.34109774,0.00013990684,0.0002901678,0.00032182233,0.55921525,0.00005375372,0.0037797424,0.0013189735,0.08036249,0.00088353996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017334876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006219827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25611138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000086666245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019546853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99432003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002479604","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.001","title":"The effect of self-affirmation on perception of racism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Perception; Psychology; White (mutation); Ethnic group; Social psychology; Social perception; Prejudice (legal term); Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.018544145140271626,"score_gpt":0.41830124515515926,"score_spread":0.3997571000148876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002479604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966453,0.00030981455,0.000025649697,0.0032453116,0.0015722961,0.00014602343,0.0000011882678,0.000010159241,0.028236559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979305,0.00013222218,0.00010793502,0.0002958915,0.001441059,0.0000048028396,5.219345e-7,0.000008219137,0.000078829326],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979795,0.0007917856,0.00056776666,0.00009700074,0.0003622819,0.00020161545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987656,0.00024602647,0.0007432643,0.00007956055,0.00011323608,0.000052300453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012358892,0.00009826158,0.0002999997,0.00008433926,0.0003525333,0.000011540969,0.00031080373,0.00019879559,0.00022834945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000900633,0.0000701842,0.00026636588,0.00015749628,0.00048467325,0.00015176105,0.000015770844,0.0002109703,0.000023063008],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004304322,0.0017204058,0.004542386,0.0000139448475,0.0003964881,0.0000051323805,0.16783068,0.00000472537,0.5458788,0.021392863,0.054613326,0.19929688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01905778,0.035668034,0.33211437,0.00016691507,0.00029599963,0.00009802847,0.12135629,0.000024463943,0.12607384,0.0048366683,0.35932368,0.0009839246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039656723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014553594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41980502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016035643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028565944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28620285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002575548","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.008","title":"Looking back with regret: Visual perspective in memory images differentially affects regret for actions and inactions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Regret; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Meaning (existential); Observer (physics); Cognitive psychology; Action (physics); Computer science; History","score_opus":0.08938999900841262,"score_gpt":0.4075958705156165,"score_spread":0.3182058715072039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002575548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851167,0.00029682228,0.00032956857,0.0004037698,0.00044044876,0.00021970732,0.0000041333096,0.000008525024,0.013180279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986287,0.00006871924,0.00053244055,0.00041793482,0.00021773261,0.000015007513,2.0213204e-7,0.000015342883,0.000103937644],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905515,0.000106648185,0.00023449068,0.00025306272,0.00013785993,0.00021278525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939454,0.0000788344,0.00032902992,0.000059306403,0.000069541406,0.00006876131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012574394,0.00013396036,0.00025404716,0.00015650077,0.00022560809,0.00003243603,0.00014083993,0.000085953674,0.00020125094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000706717,0.00010637202,0.000072350915,0.00016020618,0.00033991868,0.00042568453,0.000025738615,0.0002382654,0.0000026257883],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015835243,0.0007078335,0.0010031678,0.000016323203,0.00003129278,0.00004122696,0.009906058,5.525601e-7,0.9834479,0.0020030877,0.000502479,0.00075652526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043426156,0.004629164,0.036081333,0.00007734274,0.000043742613,0.00067215995,0.03114842,0.000009285026,0.9200362,0.002263003,0.0003622728,0.0003344689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024495555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016562311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063411735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087740256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053013082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4337725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004199652","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.006","title":"On the determinants of implicit evaluations: When the present weighs more than the past","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Implicit attitude; Social psychology; Cognition; Negative affectivity; Semantic differential; Implicit-association test; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Personality","score_opus":0.07515324511601966,"score_gpt":0.47540049789284716,"score_spread":0.4002472527768275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004199652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8666878,0.0008231551,0.000016623011,0.10835793,0.0014586787,0.00035538457,0.0000035941748,0.000007773699,0.022289116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99073756,0.00008111314,0.000017080925,0.0067707743,0.0021145833,0.000017438766,3.5824726e-7,0.000009225749,0.00025189383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973028,0.0010359952,0.0005679403,0.00015633843,0.0006045471,0.000332435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983894,0.00046421422,0.00069131405,0.00022379299,0.00017114902,0.000060077506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015252224,0.00014248668,0.00028542904,0.000054069827,0.001062382,0.000043924858,0.0010676683,0.00016561929,0.0005227609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016088515,0.00006917829,0.0003271318,0.00021518103,0.001144902,0.000109078916,0.000039549683,0.00039000157,0.000017713208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012716014,0.0023073591,0.007577682,0.0000024046797,0.00033331197,0.00002046181,0.32393986,0.0000028768309,0.030007293,0.1368291,0.45530593,0.042402126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027774405,0.0041791447,0.52896535,0.00006655583,0.00014992758,0.000092117625,0.17294599,0.000013624594,0.0034702949,0.2097899,0.077115245,0.0004344205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015831027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000051676743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52138764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000096709926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006925285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8171091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007717783","doi":"10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00525-5","title":"The effects of near wins and near losses on self-perceived personal luck and subsequent gambling behavior","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Psychology; Roulette; Social psychology; Game of chance; Counterfactual conditional; Perception; Coin flipping; Counterfactual thinking","score_opus":0.06055914026704855,"score_gpt":0.41747544531216696,"score_spread":0.3569163050451184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007717783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99426913,0.0029848623,0.0000022161094,0.00012074702,0.0014993916,0.00025371637,0.000003952426,0.00001125311,0.0008547562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991513,0.00012021989,0.0003048315,0.00019673361,0.00011146485,0.000022263239,9.4409086e-7,0.000028182287,0.00006407532],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984367,0.0003337152,0.0004229455,0.00024510166,0.0002431975,0.00031833458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991289,0.00020276498,0.0003444598,0.00012450294,0.00006746653,0.00013192734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026251734,0.00021458665,0.00037017112,0.000067303336,0.00047381534,0.000060224647,0.00012589879,0.0002411338,0.00008624945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033645192,0.00016002536,0.00015599419,0.00009472978,0.0005328855,0.000071076574,0.000020668595,0.00039822052,0.000006939215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030165007,0.012892084,0.45335466,0.000051903662,0.0016490172,0.0013872659,0.100365184,3.879082e-7,0.40754396,0.0037481345,0.0026059279,0.013384988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006599887,0.004676887,0.9721398,0.000039921666,0.00029494122,0.00082316296,0.0044074096,9.142921e-7,0.009107783,0.000086784734,0.0015849272,0.00023761581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003834613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000024593894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5187851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000721693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003989106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65256447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010589301","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.009","title":"When self-disclosure goes awry: Negative consequences of revealing personal failures for lower self-esteem individuals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Stressor; Self-disclosure; Self-esteem; Social psychology; Distress; Competence (human resources); Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04988983559816498,"score_gpt":0.42520111031499924,"score_spread":0.37531127471683423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010589301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9887292,0.0017730615,0.00036581335,0.0023720213,0.0021472087,0.00039747034,0.000056760688,0.000038630642,0.0041198405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98907816,0.000041583455,0.009102978,0.00042223153,0.0008742033,0.000025624055,0.000010009155,0.00003202778,0.00041319884],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978157,0.00034186046,0.00087027205,0.00026794316,0.0003434072,0.0003608076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981012,0.00031470577,0.0011514894,0.00011229585,0.0002148475,0.00010549355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049142254,0.00024433923,0.0005814674,0.00019521904,0.0003831921,0.00001560912,0.00032439115,0.0004157232,0.0005105612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003678929,0.00021073523,0.00041591816,0.00015655492,0.00061400584,0.00020145763,0.000035477864,0.00042764,0.000012302443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033077984,0.007940885,0.27519038,0.00006718148,0.0054853167,0.0002501367,0.5317485,0.000009401586,0.041333035,0.028583288,0.1057394,0.000344691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04434629,0.022614598,0.60539335,0.0003652228,0.0018000042,0.0052849026,0.21949641,0.000081999955,0.012845102,0.031561263,0.05291483,0.0032960004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019294117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027422109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.330203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011296481,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011385272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85935336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011770984","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2000.1436","title":"Addressing Discrepancies between Values and Behavior: The Motivating Effect of Reasons","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Helpfulness; Social psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Value (mathematics); Feeling; Salient; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.18514174573605513,"score_gpt":0.4953939467555255,"score_spread":0.3102522010194704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011770984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926571,0.0024088374,0.000016692125,0.0006079094,0.0005926022,0.00013200354,0.000006041134,0.00000894591,0.0035698572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988938,0.000029774365,0.00006773179,0.000085973064,0.000760985,0.000008908778,0.0000018350614,0.000012660212,0.00013832665],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985438,0.00044183788,0.0004525261,0.00014994726,0.0001856948,0.0002261892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903023,0.00024181267,0.0005172822,0.00010467582,0.00004652099,0.00005944789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004412552,0.00015266197,0.0004276725,0.000053296626,0.0002485298,0.000027584305,0.00021240309,0.0001287414,0.000272051],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044366774,0.000088357345,0.00018918951,0.000113853705,0.00041736304,0.00010358289,0.000052949974,0.00027002097,0.0000028551278],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056302035,0.00038781733,0.80608916,0.000010775712,0.00032923583,0.000046492085,0.02625989,1.1237004e-7,0.12852864,0.00089868833,0.0039120517,0.03297408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012161514,0.0013416251,0.9853474,0.000039052848,0.00013534175,0.00022443454,0.007997114,3.5301292e-7,0.0030123182,0.0002933866,0.00028714063,0.000105700245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009141479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018556727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1792582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023870622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000061229503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3603108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012958538","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.005","title":"An implicit measure of anti-gay attitudes: Prospective associations with emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Racial and Ethnic Identity Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Psychology; Rumination; Distress; Lesbian; Association (psychology); Clinical psychology; Implicit attitude; Mood; Stressor; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Cognition","score_opus":0.08540626382759992,"score_gpt":0.48359362113106075,"score_spread":0.39818735730346083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012958538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906747,0.0001769473,0.00027928798,0.0012470941,0.00014899361,0.00017902804,0.000005770978,0.000012825523,0.0072753634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99914104,0.000045946003,0.00018098098,0.000060757153,0.00053462223,0.0000022437637,0.0000035485027,0.000005193558,0.00002568895],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835145,0.00038776986,0.00033280946,0.00017254258,0.0005291412,0.00022628547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990817,0.000031161537,0.0003931015,0.000071699316,0.0003228749,0.00009950417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007513904,0.00009549651,0.0002823975,0.00009309518,0.00048649608,0.00011048849,0.00019192733,0.00020798908,0.00006648784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004857627,0.000079049554,0.00007690001,0.0002597992,0.0005125083,0.0007713999,0.000008972024,0.00025569435,0.0000011625473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014340327,0.006692808,0.11363044,0.000011300897,0.0002474164,0.00003222703,0.083753176,0.000021631684,0.67081094,0.10394833,0.0013246736,0.018093029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008304468,0.0017386094,0.97635514,0.000014716957,0.000015317397,0.00001105484,0.013401145,0.00000109169,0.0006645577,0.006837856,0.000036996724,0.00009309385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017545084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016154064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86272466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012460067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006310382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37417838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013327778","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.002","title":"At the first sign of trouble or through thick and thin? When nonconformity is and is not disengagement from a group","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nonconformity; Disengagement theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Norm (philosophy); Harm; Developmental psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.12137013762571122,"score_gpt":0.3952981577508896,"score_spread":0.27392802012517836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013327778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9472985,0.0012716994,0.000049587357,0.011472421,0.0012438911,0.00025550122,0.00002667476,0.000010625995,0.038371082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98700905,0.0006151031,0.00042530443,0.010861676,0.0006427061,0.000009874882,8.965191e-7,0.000014320037,0.00042107888],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982303,0.000308303,0.0005634936,0.00025021943,0.00034276635,0.00030491487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989096,0.00018374399,0.00059399725,0.00013232515,0.00007945368,0.00010088204],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006909619,0.00017312831,0.0004335772,0.000041374165,0.0008398498,0.000031359963,0.00038339957,0.0002700083,0.0039767544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004019716,0.00011712446,0.00017824996,0.00010702809,0.001491609,0.0003709921,0.0001496128,0.00032862418,0.000011528887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029965036,0.0007259321,0.010708089,0.0000068318004,0.00038201537,0.000019230123,0.8923911,6.9259705e-9,0.007140319,0.008991964,0.073519565,0.003118442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010759893,0.0053530554,0.30649212,0.00008610555,0.00029960743,0.00007524078,0.2791399,0.0000024816609,0.012000387,0.052952692,0.3320044,0.00083411706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035516017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096453656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6132512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000102650876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003689595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99693376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014067722","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1506","title":"Loving the One You Hurt: Positive Effects of Recounting a Transgression against an Intimate Partner","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Marine transgression; Psychology; Social psychology; Intimate partner; Control (management); Mechanism (biology); Developmental psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Domestic violence; Poison control; Epistemology","score_opus":0.043960419142608856,"score_gpt":0.4326559793626814,"score_spread":0.38869556022007257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014067722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753142,0.001964578,0.00076849794,0.0010204269,0.0018052359,0.00021895184,0.0000032133244,0.0000133540525,0.018891571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982451,0.00004938397,0.00031255957,0.00054762606,0.00058178784,0.0000073909705,0.0000041174317,0.000026619577,0.00022536996],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982225,0.00047808903,0.0006099256,0.00017908562,0.0002332772,0.00027717793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882644,0.000155303,0.00072392,0.00014516067,0.00008137239,0.00006777797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003915171,0.00016148605,0.00033820266,0.00012263026,0.00028778167,0.000019073977,0.00026871046,0.00024630167,0.0004905748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016583128,0.0001200088,0.00021178121,0.00017810341,0.00026242193,0.00019396265,0.000025164987,0.0005040373,0.000026982638],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015796113,0.0076088095,0.026108323,0.000046605222,0.0014046949,0.00022552162,0.18167612,0.000025503403,0.7126591,0.008665734,0.0056037023,0.054396242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.031122416,0.0117717525,0.8407141,0.0010335783,0.0011613317,0.00082647416,0.054747,0.001588369,0.047010332,0.0049096923,0.0030058925,0.0021090687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009157622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001802819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8146058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006294022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007561121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.537145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017278929","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.007","title":"On the belief in God: Towards an understanding of the emotional substrates of compensatory control","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Control (management); Anxiety; Belief system; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12895611729284998,"score_gpt":0.41606456369613565,"score_spread":0.2871084464032857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017278929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97303015,0.00038108852,0.000047134778,0.0071548615,0.0011186321,0.00014550392,0.0000062227587,0.0000031872676,0.018113196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978922,0.000055531833,0.000017302678,0.0016513298,0.00035777022,0.0000018909617,4.075368e-7,0.0000071081936,0.000016457254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760437,0.0010404687,0.00057752227,0.0001209993,0.00044527208,0.00021135685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989321,0.00022857252,0.00057484716,0.000117732496,0.00009021907,0.00005653484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011548258,0.00009998514,0.00032416757,0.00008648086,0.00040120937,0.000007379134,0.00046285664,0.00017328642,0.0002759736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006632083,0.00006646816,0.00021203961,0.00021655223,0.0017565571,0.000090272406,0.000013948832,0.000294403,0.0000016520161],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014189406,0.0034251453,0.10103448,0.000007696892,0.00022626539,0.00003204159,0.1690988,0.000023260993,0.065060414,0.6405529,0.01895421,0.00016584633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044106315,0.0013176746,0.8480964,0.000053688782,0.000021636828,0.00006977072,0.076449834,0.0000033503982,0.002962805,0.065811716,0.0005962925,0.00020623337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000610508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030835855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7470619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015573941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016475841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64721084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018582012","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.012","title":"Your mistakes are mine: Self-other overlap predicts neural response to observed errors","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ohio Federal Research Network","keywords":"Psychology; Error-related negativity; Stroop effect; Anterior cingulate cortex; Negativity effect; Task (project management); Neural correlates of consciousness; Cognitive psychology; Degree (music); Social psychology; Neural activity; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.2357049282930043,"score_gpt":0.4458876021687439,"score_spread":0.2101826738757396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018582012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785538,0.0002951822,0.0000026522523,0.017929913,0.0018766051,0.00021960236,0.000017386497,0.00006427169,0.00104063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97827005,0.0000069139664,0.0001665884,0.020469135,0.0006230809,0.0000063318766,2.7424446e-7,0.000024406732,0.00043321587],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975388,0.000479268,0.00063298445,0.000442277,0.00040368727,0.00050295366],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890673,0.000081470724,0.00052511063,0.00018535469,0.00007706121,0.00022428273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027147864,0.00029778457,0.00051032024,0.0001755928,0.00030372257,0.0000380834,0.0005230889,0.00018179929,0.000115789495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014726353,0.00024483952,0.00029262307,0.0003434264,0.00020722476,0.00022741962,0.00003826051,0.0004072051,0.00004626421],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044615148,0.0012099236,0.003707484,0.0000012953014,0.000015840998,0.00038709323,0.002468396,0.0000015360079,0.9677986,0.00001508356,0.01952321,0.00041004585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005224757,0.007940169,0.5823244,0.000033490152,0.000061330175,0.0008802807,0.00436907,0.0000025817635,0.38128838,0.0002245106,0.01703931,0.00061174564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000039208744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017599358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5865102,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009930152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019962103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99842656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019406163","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.009","title":"You can’t always get what you want: The motivational effect of need on risk-sensitive decision-making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Risk-seeking; Social psychology; Irrational number; Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Economics","score_opus":0.05784026192484497,"score_gpt":0.44220946422586266,"score_spread":0.3843692023010177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019406163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919472,0.0002957081,0.00047465827,0.0031108696,0.0026336403,0.00017726747,0.000023364777,0.0000083137365,0.0013289872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971697,0.000043645236,0.0004956446,0.0016534815,0.0006017443,0.0000018714384,0.0000013680461,0.000015584536,0.00001698548],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586266,0.00070270436,0.0014609125,0.0004016054,0.0012548319,0.0003172944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99395734,0.003245907,0.001989302,0.00036312334,0.00033751316,0.00010679008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035349955,0.00026688652,0.00076913583,0.0003965575,0.000449497,0.00024155594,0.0009276226,0.00022633898,0.00027129913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015583823,0.00016051889,0.00058792176,0.00045691687,0.0003165451,0.00048378826,0.000084178966,0.0005534456,0.000052000185],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037136015,0.0006852419,0.0032837377,4.5936375e-7,0.000081228885,0.00008345473,0.0052370196,0.0002459976,0.0161052,0.00052176055,0.012142743,0.9578996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014190784,0.02423671,0.43563655,0.0006793574,0.00029710366,0.0012096998,0.046148486,0.00045549305,0.060336616,0.4078516,0.0074727037,0.0014849112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009167385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003523459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95641464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018770617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006703654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.654577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019451974","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.004","title":"The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Harm; Hostility; Social psychology; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Test (biology); Salient; Developmental psychology; Social group","score_opus":0.025144728190153308,"score_gpt":0.42052516169046045,"score_spread":0.39538043350030716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019451974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99368405,0.0006671875,0.000056724897,0.0011326136,0.001649339,0.00015471857,5.8119014e-7,0.0000052203463,0.0026495357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986665,0.00010772412,0.00017611141,0.00014956911,0.00086443627,0.000005128526,9.0962567e-7,0.0000072455705,0.000022355249],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99825925,0.00055722106,0.0005912934,0.000108081826,0.0002917689,0.0001924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989649,0.00013218359,0.0006635566,0.00006585088,0.00012103756,0.00005249176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007099718,0.00008302956,0.00024524317,0.00014205958,0.00021359316,0.000011112226,0.00024239665,0.00019527179,0.000044929653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009817751,0.00007085392,0.0001254812,0.00026794753,0.00056607253,0.00031930069,0.000016093481,0.00019379059,0.0000023425507],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011435206,0.0016846951,0.010446847,0.000006522615,0.00006837795,0.000005090602,0.08026014,0.0000032672453,0.8042333,0.017759891,0.0009173668,0.08347094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012699858,0.006607434,0.6505198,0.00010790644,0.00006937321,0.00005634303,0.086940624,0.000020996815,0.22009636,0.012654004,0.009773105,0.00045418474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002339744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037215717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64007294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020460864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055716682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28893393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019638363","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.019","title":"Attachment avoidance and feelings of connection in social interaction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Belongingness; Feeling; Social psychology; Pride; Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.035739876770748656,"score_gpt":0.4736083244474877,"score_spread":0.43786844767673905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019638363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98807406,0.0002356749,0.00029387375,0.0010373773,0.0033023993,0.000097540855,0.000001881046,0.000006192559,0.0069509787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880093,0.000013060525,0.00022870234,0.00016469821,0.0006649993,0.000005481626,0.0000024952362,0.000011793196,0.00010782393],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890137,0.00012477918,0.00055005867,0.00014069471,0.00012666504,0.00015645586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992239,0.00005627816,0.00056928984,0.000054482793,0.000058501944,0.000037541875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036503762,0.00010557771,0.00025834437,0.00019059032,0.000117819254,0.000009291452,0.00009770357,0.00026311024,0.0003461006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013975001,0.00010330339,0.00009945989,0.00012878574,0.00019638652,0.00013462575,0.000021870912,0.00063296634,0.0000068468808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018045104,0.001970246,0.300661,0.000011591044,0.00020446358,0.000029559555,0.03185087,0.0000031765858,0.6158594,0.035999455,0.0039533176,0.007652442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054585864,0.0008902195,0.9685185,0.000020158759,0.000042554075,0.00028903998,0.015359396,0.00003913776,0.003050957,0.00278528,0.0032917538,0.00025443762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029147783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020149979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66785747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057373003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013624632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42125902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020152110","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2000.1444","title":"Black Experimenters and the Intellectual Test Performance of White Participants: The Tables Are Turned","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social dominance orientation; Moderation; Dominance (genetics); Social psychology; Test (biology); Race (biology); Developmental psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.059923290713064375,"score_gpt":0.3893152302020323,"score_spread":0.32939193948896794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020152110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97323537,0.002114125,0.000024034245,0.011580864,0.0010586195,0.0001933375,0.0000022806892,0.000008826223,0.011782561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995217,0.0012729323,0.000022311255,0.0021862546,0.00092950347,0.000013040377,3.682092e-7,0.000013026377,0.00034555813],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789035,0.0005915772,0.00061100343,0.00016320402,0.00032819685,0.00041567642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998466,0.0005075145,0.000669261,0.00012405042,0.00013964679,0.00009349697],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011839127,0.00015353099,0.000423527,0.00006730769,0.00090055715,0.000037369187,0.00053443655,0.00015477065,0.0006850819],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003688457,0.00009158576,0.0001972876,0.00029024953,0.0042056195,0.00019647088,0.000091875634,0.00031950918,0.000009790188],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0053305305,0.0013794077,0.05724236,0.000007459372,0.00039121948,0.000022289158,0.84018886,0.0000020698703,0.042040803,0.0044961157,0.045845747,0.0030531592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011495297,0.0030121498,0.08128415,0.00010914638,0.00015290093,0.00016790123,0.7886628,0.000055297507,0.005346331,0.0017078121,0.10747785,0.0005283487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011763257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006617777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061632104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074290496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004560779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99850434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029386813","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.016","title":"Thanks for asking: Self-affirming questions reduce backlash when stigmatized targets confront prejudice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Backlash; Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Perception; Self-affirmation; Social perception","score_opus":0.04328763604152922,"score_gpt":0.43295707389239324,"score_spread":0.389669437850864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029386813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8290136,0.0010056539,0.0016796269,0.017974414,0.021868592,0.0009508805,0.00002125793,0.00015103577,0.12733498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828184,0.000051346935,0.009450766,0.0016744034,0.0053156475,0.00005566779,0.0000038744242,0.000033861714,0.0005959892],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975892,0.00039897393,0.00074587006,0.0003074124,0.00037397907,0.0005846017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820006,0.00024955854,0.00078356423,0.00014239935,0.00037362697,0.00025079923],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012847331,0.00021557536,0.0005222236,0.00014920512,0.0010158283,0.00008205229,0.0006342964,0.0005375323,0.0009453018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035942215,0.00021721012,0.00039157105,0.00015620312,0.00065136555,0.00036204315,0.00004823343,0.00067033066,0.000031987693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077950483,0.0018155227,0.000755798,0.000009155387,0.0003777911,0.000020129964,0.1177453,2.2618396e-7,0.575591,0.063081056,0.235223,0.0046015005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0064018797,0.0014562932,0.010675803,0.000044067,0.00013691938,0.000107205255,0.027845366,0.0000072671455,0.008657374,0.033087246,0.9108889,0.0006916976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019459394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002424958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6756659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018352614,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002237117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032527315","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.001","title":"I like it, because I like myself: Associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit evaluations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":258,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Psychology; Associative property; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Endowment effect; Object (grammar); Cognition; Anchoring; Implicit attitude; Mechanism (biology); Association (psychology); Ingroups and outgroups; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07080506364724026,"score_gpt":0.45498146876533013,"score_spread":0.38417640511808987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032527315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97486216,0.0017617807,0.000044296223,0.005353245,0.0030107715,0.00029203296,0.000023298422,0.00002636477,0.01462605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99285805,0.00019515079,0.00063892576,0.002574681,0.0034406807,0.000023568764,0.0000049601194,0.000022546268,0.00024146002],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972632,0.00056009373,0.00082346285,0.00027083798,0.0006440743,0.00043835977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801105,0.00027666352,0.0009374163,0.00009918598,0.0005368006,0.00013887383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011371888,0.00019545043,0.0005354407,0.00022494217,0.0005861176,0.00003948284,0.00035074167,0.00037037517,0.00043225233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000107276,0.00019335537,0.00029489453,0.00034583604,0.0004884471,0.0004150469,0.00007379428,0.00034324705,0.000014479464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010029,0.0051575047,0.024776276,0.000013007911,0.00095848023,0.000058863967,0.4765187,5.901258e-7,0.2903013,0.03425703,0.15485027,0.012105084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006468185,0.0031118575,0.78599906,0.00007841655,0.00025559764,0.000070243,0.11854485,0.0000051215734,0.0014178663,0.019804059,0.06344104,0.0008036931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064999075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017553572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7612228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003100449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012349701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7884803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032887269","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1494","title":"Committing Altruism under the Cloak of Self-Interest: The Exchange Fiction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Prosocial behavior; Altruism (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Compassion; Social exchange theory; Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13329243406849026,"score_gpt":0.4162112716150567,"score_spread":0.28291883754656644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032887269","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9252503,0.0050957836,0.00001294685,0.014121013,0.00217998,0.00021454449,0.0000030216668,0.00001832743,0.053104114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969866,0.00044366572,0.00009555265,0.0012603977,0.001006795,0.0000106734915,2.68061e-7,0.000013968746,0.00018204651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838394,0.0004473393,0.0005345866,0.00012698032,0.0002321635,0.00027498018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891144,0.0001489772,0.00067259785,0.00012754707,0.000084148196,0.00005529505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007799012,0.0001266166,0.00027217242,0.00005411098,0.0009989506,0.00003936159,0.00051525736,0.00012208539,0.0006516314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020480655,0.00008517287,0.00024055425,0.0001502346,0.000810507,0.00017337431,0.00008980274,0.00031555997,0.00001912618],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025022004,0.0031469055,0.0076527284,0.000010325275,0.00069314206,0.000021785094,0.5989721,0.0000044358,0.10680125,0.06830588,0.20676905,0.007372178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041515855,0.0018414496,0.02552382,0.000056517787,0.00020957414,0.00013093046,0.7396855,0.000028195083,0.022494733,0.0036628328,0.20154299,0.0006718973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025696325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009379762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14071336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025691796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018084229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7683221},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033027375","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.003","title":"When threat matters: Self-regulation, threat salience, and stereotyping","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Norsk Sykepleierforbund; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Psychology; Mortality salience; Social psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Terrorism; Affect (linguistics); Stereotype threat; Terror management theory; Cognitive psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.06978188319844027,"score_gpt":0.40954382144713286,"score_spread":0.3397619382486926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033027375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9143512,0.0018954679,0.00029840157,0.022483515,0.0037494907,0.00020267731,0.0000025470194,0.000058739966,0.056957934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912474,0.00007563197,0.001024063,0.0051965513,0.0020809665,0.000005601925,0.0000012781524,0.000018203102,0.00035028558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981639,0.00039926267,0.00047873144,0.00022011396,0.00037847154,0.00035953708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990133,0.00005732885,0.0003890677,0.00009053254,0.00019939555,0.0002503794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080508046,0.00015438703,0.00035305295,0.00013294336,0.00040233036,0.00007462474,0.00031771185,0.0002492041,0.00042225298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042971333,0.00014378344,0.00012756254,0.00016828407,0.00064842904,0.00048378008,0.000054774988,0.00021945717,0.00003570549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009774952,0.0012728252,0.037795402,0.00000791712,0.00039889172,0.000066227796,0.4763457,5.545576e-7,0.023718592,0.05603879,0.39167506,0.011702571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009322404,0.0026528751,0.10325049,0.00007815737,0.00014766949,0.00041787833,0.18511428,0.000006011951,0.0012096224,0.13654551,0.5602359,0.0010191565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024853038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004963531,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2912314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021978749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008920376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5863319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033196190","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.001","title":"Not always the best medicine: Why frequent smiling can reduce wellbeing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Well-being; Subjective well-being; Developmental psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.14044060590787702,"score_gpt":0.38133259061263125,"score_spread":0.24089198470475423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033196190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8937489,0.00033479722,0.00025342673,0.082328744,0.00473956,0.00012431563,0.000002895474,0.000017246055,0.018450113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95656,0.00006851046,0.00014233337,0.040592633,0.0024916597,0.000005424149,6.948144e-7,0.000018249322,0.00012045424],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978004,0.00044062614,0.0006036281,0.000305052,0.00048289678,0.0003673739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989518,0.00020202069,0.00048236482,0.00017053522,0.000056067376,0.00013723287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007017484,0.00019361151,0.00033787335,0.00010525331,0.00055482617,0.00002129951,0.00064020033,0.00013277294,0.00027771213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017567909,0.00012938134,0.00018047531,0.00016171084,0.000768705,0.00010718201,0.00006148372,0.0005131306,0.000041127772],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018932756,0.00029075908,0.000090919515,0.0000019095116,0.00001835143,0.000030255815,0.0016251176,0.0000058352166,0.96786827,0.004276702,0.02310365,0.0024989215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007558743,0.0047222907,0.011147607,0.00016033128,0.00010422222,0.0025574074,0.007143053,0.000057166748,0.8084499,0.016776126,0.14058931,0.00073380885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004479306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032359253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15941831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010196899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023170795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5276018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033708859","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.004","title":"Kicking the habit: Effects of nonstereotypic association training and correction processes on hiring decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Training (meteorology); Association (psychology); Task (project management); Habit; Social psychology; Cognition; Function (biology); Applied psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04752118897731331,"score_gpt":0.4002919166513031,"score_spread":0.35277072767398976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033708859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98204845,0.00064643973,0.00023312976,0.0031629934,0.004376073,0.00015886937,6.07597e-7,0.000012718255,0.009360711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978446,0.00013298685,0.000083620296,0.00088069297,0.0009734553,0.0000069298735,2.6540468e-7,0.000010170223,0.00006729206],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861753,0.00028309744,0.0003905017,0.00013615613,0.00033074294,0.00024198396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836606,0.0007143686,0.0006493183,0.00005158475,0.00015726734,0.00006139712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069208053,0.0001029922,0.00027722266,0.00010868867,0.00060569076,0.000033000593,0.00019794493,0.00019847519,0.000025365956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001091169,0.00008162778,0.000115444454,0.0002857694,0.00031517175,0.00017231684,0.000020961961,0.000308588,0.0000036649242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010389537,0.0022847746,0.016202455,0.000030076157,0.0005652458,0.00005589426,0.71500486,0.000025406101,0.12795718,0.01694819,0.008430417,0.11145657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017697876,0.010880094,0.48738566,0.0015675186,0.00033203643,0.00031714182,0.3468719,0.0000050224603,0.053385727,0.04667781,0.03363159,0.0012475948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010252202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001081676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4711832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028703117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001121433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46585447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036418579","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.002","title":"Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Hostility; Anger; Happiness; Perception; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Categorization; Social perception; Face perception; Emotion perception; Facial expression; Developmental psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.0847735874539589,"score_gpt":0.41315217033565244,"score_spread":0.3283785828816935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036418579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8995734,0.00093701266,0.00007099842,0.015565032,0.0018239543,0.00026072393,0.0000027603073,0.0000110063465,0.08175512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967691,0.00008871363,0.00013007694,0.0019327252,0.00094138103,0.0000054553625,6.161875e-7,0.000010850113,0.00012113243],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975783,0.0007243775,0.00069529616,0.0001737664,0.00050420273,0.0003240303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981215,0.00032903047,0.0011358211,0.00014792905,0.00020343477,0.00006229047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001347565,0.00015458692,0.00042237094,0.000094505725,0.00061895023,0.000040663723,0.00066586694,0.00022766757,0.00030228894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012753908,0.00009785992,0.00030506242,0.0003195595,0.00089801365,0.00026191547,0.0000249122,0.00035919106,0.000008146419],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019037918,0.0031124006,0.0016332101,0.000005830241,0.00039414642,0.000010681043,0.124751374,0.000010536241,0.7265634,0.0969436,0.031366866,0.013304182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010163819,0.007346921,0.28176072,0.00017205067,0.00027571135,0.000059574533,0.3538611,0.000011515233,0.18557794,0.13673186,0.02315152,0.0008872717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017341207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016445207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5409854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000963918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008472347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47605273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036610118","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.030","title":"Social cues for creativity: The impact of behavioral mimicry on convergent and divergent thinking","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mimicry; Psychology; Divergent thinking; Improvisation; Convergent thinking; Creativity; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social relation; Creative thinking; Ecology","score_opus":0.12014455396969041,"score_gpt":0.5175137084388569,"score_spread":0.3973691544691665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036610118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99380624,0.00025782728,0.00005771046,0.0027404868,0.0011809625,0.00020338729,0.000015364625,0.000006364173,0.0017316521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99842685,0.00001809115,0.00004683748,0.00092248514,0.00047455097,0.0000074600284,0.0000014125343,0.000008711093,0.000093608],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884367,0.00020147231,0.00036463953,0.00017465386,0.00019399865,0.00022157097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917525,0.000110253895,0.00048559115,0.000092520786,0.000072210045,0.000064147906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035344582,0.00014083205,0.0003040397,0.000095006864,0.00033634235,0.00002213876,0.00022930974,0.00010601142,0.00031950095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017436325,0.0000993721,0.0003032751,0.000108442335,0.00033841297,0.00007931365,0.000021153535,0.00020122192,0.0000025426625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00432362,0.011844223,0.024680845,0.0000045439338,0.00026076133,0.000021694777,0.15484811,0.000002016948,0.6514779,0.018958125,0.11698831,0.016589895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035888576,0.0101338895,0.95261025,0.000015218015,0.00007995791,0.00015204558,0.014065579,0.000002927629,0.013542123,0.0037582247,0.0017930419,0.00025785275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039739996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000011521887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92792946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085874875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038086782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40522763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038317200","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.016","title":"Examining the consequences of exposure to racism for the executive functioning of Black students","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Society for Personality and Social Psychology","keywords":"Racism; Psychology; Centrality; Social psychology; Stroop effect; Active listening; Context (archaeology); Developmental psychology; Cognition; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.09249835974223712,"score_gpt":0.4510824779283103,"score_spread":0.35858411818607316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038317200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979678,0.0008360605,0.0005909942,0.0074175303,0.002101307,0.00038716136,0.000004450046,0.0000059704016,0.008978576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962839,0.000057236895,0.00016665619,0.0023241795,0.00094575033,0.0000110028095,3.0716558e-7,0.000006723881,0.00020425128],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819934,0.00037482756,0.0006087442,0.00014076331,0.00042124875,0.00025506556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983883,0.00044291708,0.0007367234,0.00010049295,0.00027133667,0.00006024341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013992443,0.00010980243,0.0003448059,0.00007263875,0.00050861563,0.000025239891,0.00070848636,0.00014701669,0.00010788124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022785299,0.00007088047,0.00022283214,0.0002619992,0.0012703914,0.00011190912,0.00003172025,0.00019701933,0.0000023915009],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024270937,0.0011004194,0.008426554,0.000004429078,0.00048808818,0.000007002045,0.42414746,0.000016600316,0.4824395,0.025854126,0.03853853,0.016550208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003558024,0.00941773,0.35326895,0.000075530894,0.00013974844,0.00002583298,0.5837763,7.337049e-7,0.01659273,0.011549259,0.021299606,0.00029558435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000085656044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019470004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46584675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007128554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006739293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.468081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041832921","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.002","title":"Having a “senior moment”: Induced aging phenomenology, subjective age, and susceptibility to ageist stereotypes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Aging and Gerontology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Valence (chemistry); Fluency; Stereotype (UML); Social psychology","score_opus":0.06318254433027805,"score_gpt":0.4503465325991842,"score_spread":0.3871639882689062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041832921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819533,0.00035558097,0.00011828823,0.0029190623,0.0025806034,0.0002501372,0.0000049634323,0.000027994505,0.011790048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968853,0.0000018828047,0.0006837605,0.000989371,0.0008566472,0.000023656312,0.0000016273333,0.00003151798,0.0005262076],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976646,0.0004463451,0.0005696108,0.0004814659,0.00021621234,0.00062177924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988803,0.00013435507,0.00031605337,0.00027124185,0.00012926289,0.0002687545],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093645154,0.00024198643,0.00055231503,0.0003203551,0.00032333966,0.000048308084,0.00039228253,0.0003607518,0.00093321636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000068666384,0.00022945197,0.00013688277,0.0002135906,0.0005663886,0.00012677736,0.00016008332,0.0012585055,0.00006346122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017253848,0.0015120478,0.048420504,0.000008606004,0.00048615717,0.0007210761,0.071376175,7.529249e-8,0.84357876,0.0043033743,0.0051313494,0.022736518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055340235,0.0036036237,0.9359519,0.000019821911,0.00006303685,0.0011693685,0.040100444,0.0000010188539,0.0062633264,0.0015827632,0.0051230853,0.00058756926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018534431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021806434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8875314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010500212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043862252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999801},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043379128","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.010","title":"Cautious to a fault: Self-protection and the trajectory of marital satisfaction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Feeling; Distancing; Mediation; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science","score_opus":0.030571993544888,"score_gpt":0.4180803313518844,"score_spread":0.3875083378069964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043379128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884747,0.0014150823,0.0013480359,0.0010230865,0.0025307154,0.0002500553,0.0000024933086,0.000011582817,0.0049442053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985936,0.000012713739,0.00035247978,0.0002755012,0.0006426251,0.0000146271395,6.4372955e-7,0.00001188979,0.00009586701],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989071,0.00028323283,0.00038894772,0.000088813315,0.00014647486,0.00018546166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940246,0.000056251356,0.00035186973,0.00007489997,0.000042791355,0.00007174913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004850457,0.00009932964,0.00022449873,0.000110015404,0.00015616046,0.0000075854946,0.0000767564,0.00017656139,0.00017685055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012774872,0.000072459865,0.00012163868,0.00012438743,0.00018192323,0.000116084695,0.000020804962,0.0002859255,0.000014843029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010093647,0.0034622534,0.4324819,0.000027712971,0.002078067,0.000019319521,0.28629115,0.000015537751,0.13613938,0.08012718,0.0123973,0.03686654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044946163,0.00064256025,0.98291016,0.000006556683,0.00009105237,0.0003815913,0.0089738,0.000009699739,0.00029899456,0.00054261665,0.0015116939,0.00013666839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068172674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005595195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5504282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008210932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010589645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29548275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050109217","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.001","title":"Becoming irreplaceable: How comparisons to the partner’s alternatives differentially affect low and high self-esteem people","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Self-esteem; Perception; Contrast (vision); Romance","score_opus":0.037651623503493596,"score_gpt":0.43305480405247837,"score_spread":0.39540318054898477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050109217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97222954,0.0007832172,0.0034578561,0.018383011,0.0024507307,0.00029959143,0.0000056059844,0.000029576402,0.0023609004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642926,0.000023563016,0.00070867507,0.0012863379,0.0009019622,0.000010450008,0.0000042493275,0.000019387779,0.00061610644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836314,0.00039776025,0.00039888942,0.00025407353,0.00023262085,0.00035350912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990386,0.00015325718,0.0004443025,0.00016895986,0.000054408105,0.00014050177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003456642,0.00022090615,0.000427578,0.00013164034,0.00040827325,0.00008577596,0.00033524501,0.00018280196,0.00018886817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015214465,0.00016145706,0.0001540534,0.00018268467,0.00009842272,0.00013156922,0.000052135827,0.00047046042,0.000022722777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004459735,0.012806143,0.30547193,0.00002880826,0.0030589628,0.00025373243,0.23904742,0.000096315904,0.05348381,0.09264479,0.27618018,0.012468178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034248556,0.0020444016,0.98058057,0.000025194837,0.00010992358,0.00022839589,0.008665831,0.000081602666,0.00029797756,0.0006038129,0.003626558,0.0003108897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000132086225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025746886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6751086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008382058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020094976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6584028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051454148","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.007","title":"Superman to the rescue: Simulating physical invulnerability attenuates exclusion-related interpersonal biases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Superman; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Interpersonal relationship","score_opus":0.06864048976226621,"score_gpt":0.43598992116101226,"score_spread":0.36734943139874604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051454148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834873,0.0009475674,0.000033001957,0.0050090435,0.004075255,0.00022764412,0.000010183143,0.000026751564,0.006183271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922312,0.0000046218693,0.00007397462,0.0036991402,0.0037560198,0.000014515978,0.0000056509534,0.000032074655,0.00018278218],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972945,0.0007912007,0.00066650345,0.00024732715,0.0003987543,0.0006017417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877256,0.0003482803,0.00028032842,0.00021064305,0.000115635194,0.00027252667],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011028487,0.0002392725,0.00046088084,0.00009845366,0.0006973054,0.000028893139,0.00045580027,0.00024904858,0.0016831266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022654116,0.0001729429,0.0004513887,0.00032905882,0.00030646668,0.00023567228,0.000200242,0.0007232897,0.000270669],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033776858,0.008385106,0.025057843,0.000009910527,0.00074324186,0.00007790411,0.6021896,0.000048958096,0.21049394,0.008697245,0.08834231,0.05257629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012693093,0.0060561704,0.690264,0.00019795468,0.00036365297,0.0011285464,0.16822287,0.00031057565,0.009442952,0.0036624349,0.1056185,0.0020392435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007973967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006075037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66520613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016055902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028191374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052948791","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1484","title":"Inducing Hypocrisy to Reduce Prejudicial Responses among Aversive Racists","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Feeling; Social psychology; Implicit attitude; Consciousness","score_opus":0.09322066532637219,"score_gpt":0.4414164362104998,"score_spread":0.3481957708841276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052948791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90799445,0.0004910076,0.000059207545,0.007689349,0.0046608374,0.00022226758,0.000004014168,0.000030100951,0.07884879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99043524,0.0000687093,0.00023328431,0.003605738,0.004140776,0.000012001071,5.024191e-7,0.000025049247,0.0014787146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707335,0.00083657494,0.0006607213,0.00031441418,0.0005230107,0.00059193076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986299,0.00016123148,0.000524996,0.00013220457,0.0002225212,0.0003291328],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007842378,0.00019726183,0.0004647985,0.00029945778,0.000822751,0.00006175707,0.00060885696,0.00037189745,0.0030266033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043385357,0.000207254,0.0003088069,0.00043255492,0.00078883994,0.00037190734,0.000070954906,0.00048992084,0.00020690463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019870496,0.0014976988,0.005422024,0.0000027562814,0.0002529736,0.00028330705,0.32415304,9.727152e-7,0.19611073,0.0041659083,0.4512183,0.014905229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009671373,0.007083394,0.251318,0.00014743207,0.00014775181,0.00033723007,0.21022874,0.000003485734,0.024548262,0.0075518447,0.48705128,0.0019112189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003067998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000065273925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24589598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036390635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005679401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99788475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056356367","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.006","title":"Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Stereotype threat; Social psychology; Task (project management); Stereotype (UML); Dual (grammatical number); Athletes; Impression formation; Perception; Social perception; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.2171078799406738,"score_gpt":0.5026864226599272,"score_spread":0.2855785427192534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056356367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9545844,0.0053421143,0.0001342088,0.0013821467,0.004764373,0.00016539733,0.0000034994202,0.000036163685,0.033587694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935789,0.0023381398,0.00020440854,0.00068403844,0.003002672,0.0000040999084,0.0000015140548,0.000024733034,0.00016148717],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755436,0.00023803306,0.0005980002,0.00028175593,0.00062080636,0.00070702727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824667,0.0003519079,0.000788792,0.00013500868,0.00029586765,0.00018177956],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011897887,0.00024015715,0.000460283,0.0001188011,0.00066899497,0.00006742555,0.0005356468,0.00033990716,0.0010379254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027292833,0.0002028155,0.00027975516,0.0004718552,0.000937181,0.001115501,0.000059663365,0.0004329988,0.000051372437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.034248546,0.004383212,0.28616172,0.000075233,0.001446134,0.00047752215,0.43393648,0.0000022009904,0.109776355,0.007255676,0.067164175,0.055072743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01169568,0.01651521,0.66597706,0.00044599088,0.00022980089,0.00043756815,0.16003022,0.0000011056215,0.040195137,0.0037168332,0.09901368,0.0017417404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003319683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002913669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3798153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041994275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024739443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057786510","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.002","title":"Unprejudiced and self-focused: When intergroup contact is experienced as being about the ingroup rather than the outgroup","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Prejudice (legal term); Ingroups and outgroups; Psychology; Social psychology; Feeling; In-group favoritism; Developmental psychology; Social identity theory; Social group","score_opus":0.03079745012225975,"score_gpt":0.39721012202572936,"score_spread":0.3664126719034696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057786510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9127946,0.0013768126,0.00039131363,0.014339397,0.0034461697,0.0003467651,0.0000016743692,0.00004484566,0.06725846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98395103,0.00014852526,0.00018969462,0.012769631,0.0025580763,0.000018268342,5.138229e-7,0.000032967557,0.0003313139],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695855,0.0005703455,0.00082554703,0.00034587597,0.00058908894,0.0007106113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827653,0.0004039515,0.0007354867,0.00021560442,0.00016146601,0.00020696547],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002544211,0.00027935544,0.00046161047,0.0001217412,0.0016138287,0.00017236362,0.001007205,0.00037790308,0.00081604236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013135494,0.00018090429,0.0003459796,0.0003015269,0.0013337897,0.00039767582,0.00013355391,0.00070986117,0.000027952197],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008588207,0.00077728526,0.005819189,0.0000022744814,0.00036964324,0.00004046596,0.85674584,2.2809658e-8,0.07274408,0.040686965,0.012759282,0.009196134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006988046,0.0031052227,0.1341618,0.00007694579,0.00014312484,0.0002776777,0.46744713,0.0000030142412,0.0063655293,0.030859964,0.34965324,0.00091827457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085047435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002817974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3892987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023619956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000072952236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058152888","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.010","title":"Experiencing Alien-Nation: Effects of a simulation intervention on attitudes toward homosexuals","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Empathy; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Situational ethics; Perspective (graphical); Empathic concern; Ideology; Attitude change; Intervention (counseling); Perspective-taking; Lesbian; Control (management); Politics","score_opus":0.07696249370002453,"score_gpt":0.4843116586144304,"score_spread":0.40734916491440587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058152888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838201,0.00060509064,0.0012498387,0.0015575973,0.0028375937,0.00019439551,8.082507e-7,0.000021355925,0.009713236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997207,0.00003128186,0.0001614624,0.0011489936,0.0013603899,0.000005482773,0.0000012144142,0.000009131064,0.000075028736],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980489,0.00046381843,0.0006344327,0.00017960742,0.00042263203,0.0002506196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987927,0.00016736743,0.00069232547,0.00007941182,0.00018341867,0.000084750354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000546073,0.00013388376,0.0003697296,0.00018119902,0.00025515433,0.000026510173,0.00028517257,0.00023144226,0.00022142153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020645437,0.00013054062,0.000290001,0.00025076303,0.00028852196,0.0002866569,0.000015309457,0.00020237845,0.00000949033],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019419986,0.007308948,0.0022255378,0.000031162068,0.00027682623,0.00006795998,0.35806394,0.000075528835,0.4817676,0.047079496,0.006005834,0.09515517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024805896,0.045547575,0.49802676,0.00086944964,0.00022882811,0.00007502845,0.18252294,0.00005748505,0.16665758,0.041029368,0.038201742,0.0019773392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000054349253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008048976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49580124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019396355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031723455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5323292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063675916","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.01.004","title":"Evidence for the DTA hypothesis II: Threatening self-esteem increases death-thought accessibility","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Self-esteem; Path analysis (statistics); Personality; Task (project management); Test (biology); Social psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.22339787917901185,"score_gpt":0.4504310449963443,"score_spread":0.22703316581733243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063675916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9760305,0.013611433,0.00041332905,0.0021178394,0.002223572,0.00043529386,0.000008568379,0.000049344424,0.0051100873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925635,0.00070542924,0.0015487818,0.0020821537,0.0024298364,0.00006327461,0.0000011410802,0.00003730081,0.0005686048],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975035,0.00045790809,0.00079935824,0.00037343177,0.000366058,0.0004997465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748456,0.0011489638,0.0007166786,0.00029752808,0.00019976271,0.00015250764],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001037494,0.00026476223,0.0005447947,0.00008408735,0.0019473742,0.000032248867,0.00075787574,0.00035376998,0.0007549724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029599306,0.00019397757,0.0006228915,0.00023848852,0.0003653776,0.00035180637,0.00014477012,0.00042004706,0.000029397628],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03552455,0.027860425,0.22765927,0.00009039987,0.0050621415,0.0011670435,0.20979166,0.0000087767585,0.12485282,0.027588964,0.2369895,0.103404455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071770675,0.003999136,0.9368508,0.0000961391,0.00039476508,0.0018259195,0.008293699,0.000011867568,0.0041371416,0.003921153,0.032560717,0.0007315953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000115215655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000063108205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70919156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018460763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113956754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065831083","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.011","title":"Fostering relationship resilience: An intervention for low self-esteem individuals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Psychological resilience; Self-esteem; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06447239959671427,"score_gpt":0.5011991610036638,"score_spread":0.43672676140694955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065831083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98190445,0.0001993922,0.0040264507,0.00068763597,0.005561586,0.00032080675,0.000008638495,0.000038367256,0.0072526643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99364257,0.0000017210439,0.004521591,0.00020197313,0.0011553342,0.00003414253,0.000015594222,0.000029457311,0.00039761295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836385,0.00021900791,0.0007146847,0.00022805366,0.00019295067,0.0002814282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987833,0.00014753571,0.00067902065,0.00017230905,0.000105727515,0.000112146074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008899116,0.00015522841,0.0002537262,0.0002090951,0.00032777007,0.00004486025,0.0003315289,0.00042506485,0.00042995496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004829357,0.00014986578,0.00025797277,0.00014684685,0.00014248499,0.00035748022,0.00006275366,0.0006453404,0.000030479912],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025194536,0.014425625,0.50611186,0.000059132002,0.0010134513,0.00006487576,0.08278847,0.000021203992,0.17034343,0.16473313,0.017483447,0.040435933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00989633,0.004199588,0.933648,0.000041690004,0.00016391167,0.00049420295,0.012996302,0.000101438854,0.0011591895,0.03160828,0.005107421,0.00058364356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000034526895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000064428627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42753613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000614346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024881105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6111349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067067182","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.001","title":"Negational racial identity and presidential voting preferences","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Social psychology; Identity (music); Psychology; Preference; Categorization; Social identity theory; Democracy; White (mutation); Race (biology); Presidential system; Presidential election; Political science; Social group; Gender studies; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09854677034355243,"score_gpt":0.44904438825428944,"score_spread":0.350497617910737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067067182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97374094,0.00097092,0.00024559762,0.0014644552,0.0027543758,0.00009978811,0.0000022379174,0.000018553725,0.02070315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949328,0.00015986989,0.00028366008,0.00068288494,0.003704489,0.000004408285,0.000001038905,0.000009812526,0.00022104153],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811697,0.0004134184,0.0004986967,0.00018976569,0.0004794585,0.00030167666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911135,0.000085644,0.00045841956,0.000043774377,0.00016554858,0.00013523607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055068126,0.00012127592,0.00029577903,0.000117429256,0.0010924229,0.000050436545,0.00032152556,0.00023079921,0.00078408624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014704198,0.000121567464,0.00016147023,0.00018256553,0.0011873308,0.0007748922,0.00005459995,0.00028567956,0.000017669061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019944382,0.002377796,0.11769357,0.000012737289,0.00058979983,0.00030206505,0.46539664,0.0000010249278,0.13384658,0.19485392,0.07029852,0.0126328925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050067315,0.0013551309,0.88141286,0.0000315338,0.00006787912,0.00048058084,0.0369915,0.0000028388072,0.0018534245,0.02846834,0.043679632,0.00064952666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029079997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021632046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7637193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008346955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011740261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85851943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067926729","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.010","title":"System justifying functions of myths that exaggerate the emotional rewards of parenthood","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; System justification; Psychology; Legitimacy; Social psychology; Mythology; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.09626169222199953,"score_gpt":0.40365819937335407,"score_spread":0.3073965071513545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067926729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551439,0.005428591,0.00019347173,0.0012379702,0.0061260625,0.00015577211,0.000011734703,0.000013688179,0.031688787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965011,0.00007885709,0.00007257735,0.00013741037,0.0030706837,0.000005454375,0.0000013167313,0.000010685759,0.000121943114],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803907,0.0005244659,0.0005102378,0.000088619185,0.00052153214,0.00031605375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869674,0.0001411788,0.00080587924,0.00007884889,0.00016631711,0.000111008776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012263824,0.000106798296,0.00033286266,0.00006816905,0.0005642696,0.00001465225,0.00027007912,0.00018582032,0.0002822105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043388904,0.000081364095,0.00030871236,0.0002348772,0.0006163246,0.00023980379,0.00003892127,0.00024643194,0.0000071806735],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014171953,0.0040074685,0.052508987,0.000102610626,0.0012232541,0.000016155618,0.6414731,0.00001939111,0.060216878,0.13790813,0.0866032,0.014503627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019580468,0.0006291517,0.116810195,0.0001471709,0.00020530718,0.000078191,0.8574788,0.0000034639877,0.004977861,0.00070022687,0.01667864,0.00033292512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009067263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009845666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21600573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015004263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009260846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4339963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068538438","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.004","title":"Choice architecture in conflicts of interest: Defaults as physical and psychological barriers to (dis)honesty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Honesty; Default; Commission; Cheating; Choice architecture; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Economics; Social psychology; Business; Public relations; Actuarial science; Psychology; Public economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.2641639832645473,"score_gpt":0.4374538265067949,"score_spread":0.17328984324224755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068538438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99017483,0.0001103233,0.00002627614,0.005575558,0.0008602837,0.00015046759,0.0000058919377,0.00000872454,0.0030876268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99318504,0.000007963739,0.00018453792,0.0061985287,0.000371941,0.000005990627,5.03036e-7,0.0000121001185,0.0000333687],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830145,0.00029894247,0.0004763882,0.00034815347,0.00027650647,0.00029853935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989537,0.00011322403,0.00026861083,0.00011082407,0.00004996203,0.00050365116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002839203,0.00018314058,0.00044310107,0.00018868466,0.0000610385,0.000012544326,0.0003510654,0.00016599573,0.00006631437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005139078,0.00014892624,0.00012113199,0.00023648475,0.0004900453,0.00010529697,0.00009212562,0.00045765314,0.000022485716],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027172745,0.0018118286,0.0029224334,0.0000043991035,0.000019444848,0.00018100538,0.01062652,0.000013177087,0.9732601,0.0020728263,0.0038204228,0.0025505791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03161842,0.03456195,0.44039202,0.00024266411,0.000064154614,0.0060207457,0.008208067,0.000023508795,0.39568615,0.05364297,0.028002752,0.0015365991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016663222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006586325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57757396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006179656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002960925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60730356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069242578","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.003","title":"Implicit partner affect, relationship satisfaction, and the prediction of romantic breakup","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Feeling; Romance; Developmental psychology; Preference","score_opus":0.03430221518405012,"score_gpt":0.4326908132562323,"score_spread":0.3983885980721822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069242578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98373556,0.0011743975,0.0011191446,0.0028471889,0.0011111001,0.0002100479,0.000004775578,0.000012928005,0.009784877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989201,0.000024285822,0.0001233074,0.00032977323,0.0003993291,0.0000051815805,0.0000031856969,0.000009485947,0.00018539322],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865615,0.0003289469,0.00056496385,0.00012824225,0.00016526798,0.00015641491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990387,0.00017323355,0.00056423945,0.00011606465,0.000060501316,0.000047287253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043241825,0.000114880444,0.00027684358,0.00011337901,0.00025096655,0.000012822727,0.0000948474,0.00020351695,0.00015706757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026174817,0.00008127424,0.00015303628,0.00015768454,0.0003584809,0.00012183984,0.000011894377,0.00034386764,0.000008373297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001879172,0.0005491986,0.72720385,0.000004346268,0.00032301116,0.000010645093,0.01479959,0.000007146433,0.01366481,0.22711706,0.010563318,0.003877866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036566549,0.0004973191,0.9845131,0.000007946997,0.000076690914,0.00024558883,0.0012693168,0.000014619644,0.0000495764,0.009420661,0.00018535434,0.000063153646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016660388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018230726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2573093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004100419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013174878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3314267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069412933","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.002","title":"Coping with a threatened group identity: Psychosocial and neuroendocrine responses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Coping (psychology); Stressor; Optimism; Social psychology; Psychosocial; Developmental psychology; Social identity theory; Clinical psychology; Social group; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04599966747282679,"score_gpt":0.421443013567161,"score_spread":0.3754433460943342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069412933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672874,0.0011021757,0.0004745838,0.01885294,0.0018787074,0.00019120397,0.000002943637,0.00003861781,0.010171395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926148,0.00034612083,0.00056610064,0.004588719,0.0017462892,0.000010504065,9.075268e-7,0.000026658689,0.00009988874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979162,0.0004025145,0.000482324,0.00027908364,0.00045123126,0.00046865185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990733,0.00007140244,0.00044773324,0.00009051042,0.00012679448,0.00019024714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046109178,0.00019394147,0.00044095956,0.0001796248,0.0007859349,0.00009748454,0.0003527086,0.00014037099,0.00016297877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071913375,0.00017433442,0.00016225157,0.00034818106,0.0011949018,0.00063635956,0.000046547982,0.000359271,0.00001140098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017782819,0.0046237498,0.02618238,0.000024715704,0.0010160194,0.002201465,0.16279744,0.0000013307265,0.29145,0.4611668,0.021686457,0.011066829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05639528,0.022728303,0.31431276,0.00027616406,0.00040852858,0.0050993166,0.12066053,2.9626753e-7,0.005343357,0.18140934,0.29075706,0.0026090664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039532184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003743243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2881304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018647032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001003168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7109151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070365994","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.003","title":"When size justifies: intergroup attitudes and subjective size judgments of “sacred space”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Ingroups and outgroups; Psychology; Social psychology; Opposition (politics); Space (punctuation); Group cohesiveness; In-group favoritism; Group conflict; Social group; Social identity theory; Linguistics; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.03060551614327758,"score_gpt":0.38975763937758817,"score_spread":0.3591521232343106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070365994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95376676,0.0007337872,0.0001854024,0.0033020526,0.0028977995,0.00017054606,0.0000045518336,0.000019548583,0.03891953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601066,0.00015065954,0.00068964815,0.0012879672,0.001393687,0.0000071167447,4.5234646e-7,0.000020653617,0.00043913609],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976051,0.00068345893,0.0006623121,0.00026900737,0.0003852857,0.00039482338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821115,0.00056416204,0.00073627563,0.00011379822,0.0002029975,0.00017161117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095732056,0.00019640427,0.0006119455,0.00009616755,0.00034816444,0.000037901344,0.00041790403,0.00032563007,0.000776531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064134895,0.0001874114,0.00024786755,0.00016854644,0.0013435155,0.00026687095,0.000080738464,0.00032630074,0.000010752872],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028285168,0.0027427603,0.04049921,0.00003913262,0.00089183165,0.000030390012,0.24873348,2.5728932e-7,0.5937501,0.04719237,0.053904664,0.009387276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0135466475,0.008284982,0.65372807,0.0002423878,0.00023318596,0.00011862634,0.14758356,0.0000024525891,0.016762355,0.061770838,0.096475616,0.0012512987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042811225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012367978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61322886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014983483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005375667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85024697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070533909","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.005","title":"The effects of priming legal concepts on perceived trust and competitiveness, self-interested attitudes, and competitive behavior","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta; Western University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Social psychology","score_opus":0.04417526576879861,"score_gpt":0.37244088973777895,"score_spread":0.32826562396898035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070533909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99558634,0.0004816782,0.00000380574,0.0014421907,0.00070868095,0.0001890728,0.0000035097523,0.000009295512,0.0015754201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767596,0.00020741485,0.00008199876,0.0018371076,0.00015425491,0.0000040996406,4.66287e-7,0.0000070131464,0.000031718766],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878526,0.00027395948,0.0003245142,0.00021305215,0.00021041819,0.00019280367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992345,0.0002755699,0.00030268868,0.000064849475,0.00004296675,0.00007942284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001442558,0.00014567563,0.00029224463,0.0000557001,0.00029314077,0.000027016475,0.00017725438,0.000087153254,0.000019532863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004828058,0.0001068023,0.0000841136,0.000055028457,0.0006572034,0.000107350555,0.000032449792,0.00026048042,0.0000018476767],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007232052,0.0011906266,0.0020894513,0.000008141061,0.000027065544,0.00011833905,0.0015535954,9.336203e-8,0.97715545,0.014757981,0.00014765968,0.0022284053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002588946,0.0039330744,0.8973313,0.00008897867,0.000027898672,0.00043980245,0.00063052366,9.868176e-7,0.09379817,0.00020840744,0.0008266056,0.00012533166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003145247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010141299,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8952418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048647653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000163436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43552712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071188485","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.009","title":"Approaching math increases math=me and math=pleasant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Math education; Test (biology); Mathematical anxiety; Representation (politics); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Mathematics education; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.050177677452289064,"score_gpt":0.42198120814358847,"score_spread":0.3718035306912994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071188485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95598525,0.0014751502,0.0005114859,0.0018110978,0.0017316621,0.0001410461,0.0000032782027,0.000034688237,0.038306333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99378246,0.00014862727,0.0009590232,0.002211181,0.0026709477,0.0000038651124,0.0000014102948,0.000023644272,0.0001988632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782217,0.0003209639,0.0006491124,0.00025204275,0.00039586256,0.0005598595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888617,0.00014444668,0.00052000355,0.00009352654,0.00009720006,0.00025862717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001842947,0.00019165424,0.0004406904,0.00016882429,0.00069223,0.00006839717,0.0003565777,0.0003383703,0.00014922174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011776621,0.00017263567,0.00021718524,0.00020821547,0.00082509674,0.00029919855,0.00006926828,0.00042453123,0.000026249965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017396654,0.0028827474,0.012155577,0.000014322165,0.0003500321,0.00035679495,0.11978472,1.5057122e-7,0.1974104,0.6240169,0.013874926,0.027413758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009778194,0.0038343682,0.31013134,0.00012912317,0.00019331196,0.0016368944,0.38397548,0.000021830485,0.0026763894,0.031239389,0.2547301,0.0016535951],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051489024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000829672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5927775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017212023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060666887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70398784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071730069","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.008","title":"Will you value me and do I value you? The effect of phenotypic racial stereotypicality on organizational evaluations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Social identity theory; Attractiveness; Diversity (politics); Value (mathematics); White (mutation); Identity (music); Ethnic group; Race (biology); Social group; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04361326044705986,"score_gpt":0.43452287183164445,"score_spread":0.3909096113845846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071730069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732266,0.00078646746,0.00017062415,0.0065121194,0.0029592405,0.0002865418,0.000008711356,0.000013353502,0.016036317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965766,0.000023350221,0.00007589744,0.0010175102,0.0021802688,0.000008045551,0.0000026296648,0.00001633654,0.00009932644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996275,0.0019851371,0.00056947017,0.0002160901,0.00068131567,0.00027296756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858737,0.00031047597,0.00053549843,0.00012341836,0.0002757672,0.00016749749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023481934,0.00016520673,0.00041885002,0.00009309413,0.0005064722,0.000040593895,0.0004015001,0.00026347509,0.0003684105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006869183,0.00011953595,0.0001744159,0.00032184614,0.0011418064,0.00023812141,0.000056397334,0.00033808983,0.000017786353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007918221,0.0020458633,0.061884865,0.000015611753,0.0009161418,0.00002129502,0.35122347,0.000029694247,0.03643685,0.49711475,0.03166235,0.010730914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03727014,0.03187436,0.42331326,0.00016550045,0.00091616187,0.00021570326,0.14284068,0.00004617612,0.015107178,0.2649269,0.08147336,0.0018505385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000099243734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012033304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3614284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019865714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001458434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48745346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074087539","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.001","title":"Does affluence impoverish the experience of parenting?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Psychology; Social psychology; Socioeconomic status; Developmental psychology; Compromise; Independence (probability theory); Sociology; Social science; Population","score_opus":0.03816629846390551,"score_gpt":0.410790949288562,"score_spread":0.3726246508246565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074087539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9642077,0.0015247373,0.00016099917,0.0006569754,0.008732795,0.0001109373,0.000004426591,0.00001677676,0.024584634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967969,0.00003161185,0.00014865937,0.0011885569,0.0015746647,0.000015966833,7.6449476e-7,0.000017236389,0.00022566013],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785054,0.0004128853,0.00075902924,0.00019464009,0.00031417343,0.0004687056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998491,0.00014301424,0.000918211,0.00024408213,0.00007725508,0.00012642212],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006636097,0.00018144514,0.00037162972,0.00008007155,0.00020089882,0.000016045798,0.0004626134,0.00021613682,0.0023121168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005899086,0.00009707514,0.00027345432,0.000219219,0.0005310702,0.00022468792,0.000051625706,0.00041748327,0.000052336458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017154556,0.003454783,0.3075147,0.00000946195,0.00042767488,0.000032163534,0.12736794,9.0578664e-7,0.48336,0.011275712,0.050629977,0.014211233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017335635,0.0007810633,0.90751946,0.000022613227,0.000045060184,0.00029628334,0.0368239,3.9461534e-7,0.020618772,0.0010808739,0.030794276,0.0002837293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006399309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.1140905e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6000048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004821103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011710543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075359494","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.008","title":"The relational versus collective “We” and intergroup allocation: The role of nested group categorization","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Superordinate goals; Categorization; Ingroups and outgroups; Social psychology; Competition (biology); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04678840124720814,"score_gpt":0.38614846642158107,"score_spread":0.33936006517437295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075359494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9041898,0.012086055,0.00036005297,0.01367658,0.008161379,0.00035866324,0.0000028828006,0.000015851214,0.0611487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976103,0.00027364338,0.00005773825,0.00022449125,0.001661153,0.000012098343,0.0000014893633,0.000008554194,0.00015057457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984238,0.00057876407,0.00039587947,0.00009090497,0.00027252763,0.00023812498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988006,0.00040141202,0.0005019865,0.00006462151,0.00016055659,0.00007085233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008636271,0.000090279864,0.00016840747,0.00004916454,0.0009283172,0.000025373609,0.00024400352,0.00016075677,0.000096662036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013432527,0.000060722745,0.000105240884,0.00026786208,0.00096297695,0.0002717547,0.000035344125,0.00021711005,0.000004412111],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022683337,0.0007203263,0.013231654,0.000001608329,0.00034345925,9.635786e-7,0.2312848,3.921406e-7,0.04309084,0.68285805,0.009489183,0.016710399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004830967,0.0020348586,0.25301316,0.000021223366,0.00011754974,0.000053519805,0.37405172,0.000009231803,0.0020545593,0.041014098,0.32243878,0.0003603479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009641748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007478257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.641844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001719311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006422618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71399593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075860471","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.001","title":"An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Self-affirmation; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology","score_opus":0.03882557613295064,"score_gpt":0.4389652204497618,"score_spread":0.40013964431681115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075860471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9859077,0.00012622717,0.000052079096,0.0018228596,0.0009632009,0.00031700247,0.0000036928438,0.000017223829,0.01079002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99366593,0.000057990448,0.0040559024,0.0015055279,0.00066426204,0.000008159543,0.000001614224,0.000014321932,0.000026280639],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973023,0.0014095361,0.00039475498,0.0003029788,0.0002510358,0.00033940133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990386,0.000064787404,0.00029657746,0.00010327448,0.00010933505,0.00038747248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015061136,0.00015840013,0.00035191703,0.00010992711,0.00058936945,0.00016539931,0.00020606595,0.00022792081,0.00020418195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053944957,0.00015833463,0.000049430684,0.00016831908,0.00022043659,0.0007149475,0.00004869753,0.00020191088,0.000009144639],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010061304,0.008510488,0.009582752,0.00000689884,0.00036063924,0.00014624036,0.61130613,9.0395497e-7,0.29257378,0.028667377,0.008147382,0.0396913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014444861,0.019793503,0.26181826,0.000060341463,0.00023904757,0.0008201586,0.35482356,0.000035453148,0.017693715,0.008630148,0.3196101,0.0020308595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018404743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002931114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31146273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016474245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007995314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6456699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076249622","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2013.08.005","title":"How time flies: The effects of conversation characteristics and partner attractiveness on duration judgments in a social interaction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Attractiveness; Social psychology; Perception; Duration (music); Dominance (genetics); Developmental psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.04874160552993516,"score_gpt":0.36506613364672114,"score_spread":0.31632452811678596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076249622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99659747,0.0000038760054,0.000026040481,0.0020896983,0.00087541825,0.00021600423,0.0000012086307,0.0000032320427,0.0001870759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985038,0.000022474951,0.000004059997,0.0011277245,0.00027942946,0.000014111867,6.9638867e-7,0.0000058998958,0.000041808253],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990551,0.00024614515,0.00025031297,0.00013725834,0.00019617555,0.00011503603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932235,0.00012783092,0.0004512955,0.000041233776,0.000034425797,0.000022860622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012874043,0.000082878134,0.00016283443,0.0000912204,0.00013242141,0.00005100529,0.00009212699,0.00006765062,0.00003572015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012549204,0.000062630796,0.00004829592,0.00010749952,0.00020280745,0.00052958436,0.00001745908,0.00017454253,0.000008500793],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001647839,0.00024769333,0.00020112027,0.000004997507,0.0000027641595,0.000003946616,0.0039113304,9.0430284e-8,0.9923258,0.0000871601,0.0004116549,0.0026386506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017701766,0.0011272647,0.41791242,0.000035443452,0.0000117941345,0.000050304283,0.0019993093,0.000067338355,0.5762768,0.00030599034,0.000323775,0.00011942141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000056956783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.451041e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41771132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006888586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011674394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.255401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076721433","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.003","title":"Relationship-specific attachment, risk regulation, and communal norm adherence in close relationships","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Receipt; Ambivalence; Norm (philosophy); Distress; Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.07334013723001617,"score_gpt":0.45134991450124334,"score_spread":0.3780097772712272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076721433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701972,0.003376333,0.0032517938,0.00049127784,0.0014256085,0.00023609637,0.000006301688,0.000020761767,0.0209946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972687,0.000058916292,0.0016319952,0.00011909961,0.00043721244,0.0000072016633,0.000014688782,0.000026033475,0.00043620126],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972956,0.0006363613,0.0011701932,0.00026405437,0.000270756,0.000363027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99799484,0.0006119561,0.0009487712,0.00021541333,0.00009867021,0.00013036118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002282085,0.00020514874,0.00033143794,0.00044657692,0.00052159757,0.000028798262,0.0002326612,0.00044540904,0.00043890288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065686734,0.00020506418,0.00013443992,0.00045993325,0.0003558476,0.00027875495,0.000047315625,0.001346187,0.000060646646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006136735,0.00054154877,0.9286032,0.0000018964233,0.000051547297,0.000030365678,0.011540976,0.000004267138,0.0010331855,0.053194273,0.0027657119,0.0016193892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027756866,0.0003416396,0.97676,0.000014303038,0.00002493504,0.0001376411,0.0054343836,0.000007775345,0.000033238382,0.011682586,0.00259787,0.0001899072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027649767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000566307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04815687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021665657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024216728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8362274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077110920","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.015","title":"“Why didn’t you just ask?” Underestimating the discomfort of help-seeking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embarrassment; Psychology; Ask price; Social psychology; Seekers; Feeling; Egocentrism; Helping behavior; Position (finance)","score_opus":0.07645188989575512,"score_gpt":0.45930442407867683,"score_spread":0.3828525341829217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077110920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93845016,0.0003870819,0.00037088784,0.0141824195,0.0044789356,0.00019908336,0.000004589494,0.000023557233,0.041903287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929857,0.000026443251,0.001358631,0.003544108,0.0019437099,0.000006462942,7.097532e-7,0.000021693264,0.00011251133],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975457,0.0003898468,0.000782225,0.00021314505,0.00058533944,0.00048373084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981834,0.00024028296,0.0011068435,0.0001961641,0.00012804152,0.00014523014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016946562,0.00017895833,0.00042668293,0.00011049613,0.001141819,0.000055463817,0.0010017643,0.00035120858,0.00050284766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002554038,0.00014620546,0.00030647716,0.00032783212,0.0029164224,0.0003755941,0.00008655158,0.00093850604,0.000008604466],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033549996,0.0014159842,0.022648394,0.000010066675,0.0002748753,0.00004638094,0.10998828,0.0000038340786,0.7642946,0.059866607,0.033437233,0.0076781884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008782738,0.0027457743,0.2492981,0.00023057917,0.0003551205,0.0004975396,0.39990506,0.00003300599,0.019829195,0.056038905,0.260335,0.0019489852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005542392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032038792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7444655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010081653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001511446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078335469","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.008","title":"Inflating and deflating the self: Sustaining motivational concerns through self-evaluation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Psychology; Promotion (chess); Social psychology; Creativity; Political science","score_opus":0.13423152355459614,"score_gpt":0.5013606678514689,"score_spread":0.3671291442968728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078335469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98026264,0.0010371464,0.000094811214,0.0026153347,0.0010799253,0.00034503083,0.0000016071687,0.000023886501,0.01453961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99619025,0.0000069950247,0.0015533337,0.0012336889,0.00088781613,0.000056403824,0.0000029581176,0.000016162694,0.000052365293],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981974,0.0004232986,0.0006707755,0.00015792303,0.00026480577,0.000285835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987955,0.00012476534,0.0006407856,0.00008756498,0.00028260762,0.00006878807],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070369727,0.00012507572,0.00020313277,0.000058792226,0.00046776177,0.00004748699,0.0001499651,0.0001489305,0.0023670546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040532344,0.00009763916,0.00012032859,0.0001308558,0.00012716708,0.00035954756,0.000040826748,0.0003921478,0.000034708777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048200978,0.004139894,0.19750851,0.00003694817,0.0011617588,0.00003921038,0.3860668,0.000012128027,0.04337495,0.09562533,0.10020403,0.17134842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004701892,0.0013899596,0.9164219,0.000044901546,0.00011736667,0.00028570378,0.06694152,0.00015419108,0.00038121964,0.004750421,0.0045310888,0.0002798715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000119709184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027011163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7189134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014607381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006260156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99854493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079785116","doi":"10.1006/jesp.1999.1421","title":"Narcissism and Intrinsic Motivation: The Role of Goal Congruence","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Narcissism; Social psychology; Intrinsic motivation; Competence (human resources); Id, ego and super-ego; Congruence (geometry); Personality; Phenomenology (philosophy); Developmental psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029315799988224936,"score_gpt":0.3689914797855213,"score_spread":0.3396756797972964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079785116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9483391,0.0044719744,0.00000822104,0.003148567,0.00075253105,0.00010249477,0.000008822394,0.00000714519,0.043161128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962138,0.000053164997,0.00008737924,0.0026189364,0.0006470517,0.0000065418167,0.0000013245026,0.00001414912,0.00035765793],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845594,0.00030453218,0.0005839524,0.00020424824,0.00019369707,0.00025761867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.00012774975,0.00036693166,0.0001574391,0.00007218026,0.00008353792],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039377998,0.00014978819,0.00035883128,0.00007804538,0.00015244953,0.000014135145,0.00032559707,0.00019944108,0.0061304737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014051868,0.00011137428,0.00014854447,0.00016301045,0.0007435081,0.00009817003,0.000020211603,0.00035901714,0.00003038581],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005960529,0.0037075318,0.06002854,0.000011093585,0.0011405316,0.00014756828,0.09208461,0.0000012836947,0.21296173,0.06372169,0.041696776,0.5185381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003714118,0.0015785863,0.8583603,0.00001657183,0.000049361945,0.0013660918,0.008899753,8.520878e-7,0.001730759,0.0067707845,0.117276736,0.00023611689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047174464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018587391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79833174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002357355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022169575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99477804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083958573","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.012","title":"To escape blame, don't be a hero—Be a victim","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University","keywords":"Blame; HERO; Wrongdoing; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.06714932421784875,"score_gpt":0.4218266111363723,"score_spread":0.35467728691852357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083958573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9117234,0.00064399414,0.00006948635,0.027269738,0.008173882,0.0002283485,0.00000920766,0.00004117587,0.0518408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848459,0.000014424332,0.0008145088,0.009564232,0.0034044362,0.000033305503,0.0000016370951,0.00005606686,0.0012655081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975954,0.00022351448,0.0007447738,0.00039154178,0.00038751925,0.00065721304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870497,0.00010136792,0.0004551239,0.00029092276,0.00015694553,0.0002906832],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005315459,0.00031801657,0.0006506588,0.0002499131,0.00032051225,0.000048254053,0.0005595099,0.00042197504,0.0062498436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051365612,0.00029018184,0.00038946667,0.00027871126,0.00035684172,0.0001483696,0.00008472926,0.0010792256,0.0002557647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021076435,0.0022993986,0.0016721432,0.000007067182,0.00077463716,0.0003823913,0.24888667,2.6076205e-7,0.34863675,0.004790173,0.38709787,0.003344986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012646676,0.004994457,0.046229053,0.000031680105,0.00019281758,0.001519435,0.46885383,0.0000010372316,0.00819033,0.0014142058,0.45466614,0.0012603411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007070751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010315555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3404464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007870833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047229845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085130169","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.022","title":"It hurts when I do this (or you do that): Posture and pain tolerance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Embodied cognition; Social psychology; Pain tolerance; Power (physics); Interpersonal communication; Interpersonal interaction; Social relation; Impression formation; Social perception; Cognitive psychology; Threshold of pain; Perception","score_opus":0.09441043168900835,"score_gpt":0.38216446346728966,"score_spread":0.2877540317782813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085130169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8141829,0.0039987243,0.0031491753,0.010249792,0.0073243454,0.0004435446,0.000012694673,0.0000636944,0.16057514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865657,0.000057896697,0.00087703427,0.009806548,0.0007377992,0.000009366999,0.0000031496807,0.000026290054,0.0019162276],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984437,0.00040757758,0.0004768807,0.00023577511,0.00020387508,0.0002321654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990627,0.000047901707,0.0005252005,0.00013931333,0.00011690187,0.00010796138],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056253985,0.00016940561,0.00030440147,0.00011261164,0.00018186682,0.00003495718,0.0001984075,0.0002989915,0.020196611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003725383,0.00014128884,0.00010891476,0.00011116209,0.00016245946,0.00025699387,0.000026648322,0.00030826573,0.00006170947],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004100882,0.0020546555,0.04937831,0.0000119234,0.00041129158,0.00022276021,0.21099514,2.4554612e-7,0.016615365,0.0064712493,0.6728749,0.036863275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011883661,0.004883739,0.4224586,0.00008349823,0.00010513669,0.0015507168,0.05946009,0.000014235787,0.0026472618,0.0047541508,0.49116543,0.0009934924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001947264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000038791745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37308025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006684442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000254998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98069906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089462467","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.003","title":"Win–win: Female and male athletes from more gender equal nations perform better in international sports competitions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Athletes; Gender inequality; Gender equality; Psychology; Inequality; Social psychology; Population; Competition (biology); Product (mathematics); Demographic economics; Demography; Gender studies; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04568476828064698,"score_gpt":0.31401216771400947,"score_spread":0.2683273994333625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089462467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9747917,0.0006927705,0.00037552475,0.0014573141,0.0008691218,0.000041340343,0.000057320594,0.0000030627793,0.021711865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99709964,0.00014147816,0.00054612744,0.0012732039,0.0007843957,0.000003521588,0.0000246626,0.00001112929,0.00011586762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905205,0.000008822108,0.00056087103,0.00016645835,0.00006620554,0.00014559875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943984,0.000025989582,0.00037594815,0.0000740269,0.00003159174,0.00005257891],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025520107,0.000094505034,0.00026724095,0.00025477362,0.00010876631,0.000035743444,0.00013917769,0.00009193264,0.0037349716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000135050195,0.00010555291,0.00009396853,0.0000887134,0.00010085504,0.00020583258,0.000033245855,0.00018286619,0.000020427693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007276732,0.0005318798,0.9322903,0.0000047446065,0.00011992756,0.000026513251,0.0058585578,0.00004368304,0.0007205181,0.05626577,0.0025726522,0.0014926706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001665995,0.00012070016,0.9528864,0.000017865905,0.0000075022044,0.000047964146,0.0012072244,0.0015395535,0.000105989,0.008003448,0.034178246,0.00021909614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000043106593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011951061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048262324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006438914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000071209442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99717575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091681727","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.016","title":"When distance pays off: The role of construal level in spending predictions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Self construal; Cognitive psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1695426554617265,"score_gpt":0.45397871341699847,"score_spread":0.28443605795527194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091681727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9473258,0.003658246,0.00024133445,0.00032130786,0.0023264189,0.00016896191,0.00004985958,0.0000075090784,0.04590052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991021,0.000020453394,0.0002969965,0.00015519005,0.00024502332,0.000015868201,0.0000017912226,0.000012612369,0.00014996789],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984294,0.0002341463,0.00078946294,0.00013454097,0.00014128642,0.0002711673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916744,0.00003316634,0.0005341721,0.0001345344,0.0000523298,0.00007834742],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003450248,0.00010779995,0.0002725298,0.00012633236,0.00011659638,0.0000050023655,0.00030151248,0.00014733573,0.0038395557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010063818,0.00008535675,0.00021027734,0.00012958683,0.00038004157,0.000111924506,0.000030529438,0.00040705572,0.000024933921],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043422543,0.011856846,0.44466606,0.000011570805,0.00041392975,0.00015952034,0.13768704,3.5292402e-7,0.04679291,0.2221168,0.03776556,0.094187155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032179689,0.0018968435,0.9245628,0.000061891944,0.000046683694,0.0003447354,0.045126446,0.0000021929786,0.0034104793,0.0064707077,0.01467412,0.000185141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025559927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007558705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47989672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008703565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029799621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092100463","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.013","title":"A grotesque and dark beauty: How moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":421,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Moral disengagement; Psychology; Morality; Social psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral authority; Moral psychology; Moral reasoning; Disengagement theory; Moral development; Punitive damages; Identity (music); Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.08961613516282774,"score_gpt":0.3556516683044142,"score_spread":0.26603553314158646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092100463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99248993,0.0001739711,0.0014017089,0.0048586894,0.00035732583,0.00019383048,0.00003539355,0.000008101734,0.000481065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974388,0.000041851363,0.0008146363,0.0014941973,0.00015697563,0.000008669079,0.0000018548743,0.000009612164,0.000033408807],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986366,0.00019152206,0.0003528479,0.00029530714,0.00030461536,0.0002190995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993582,0.00007947834,0.00030338552,0.000052423755,0.00007106726,0.00013547615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002953259,0.00015243019,0.00027719064,0.00014996281,0.00027213237,0.00003116078,0.00011032258,0.0000934121,0.000024053788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000081233564,0.00014383736,0.00006446249,0.00013308352,0.0004958092,0.00043134403,0.00010226229,0.00023319256,0.000001837636],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003980291,0.0005901084,0.0068584145,0.000011003865,0.000028125078,0.000046266276,0.00059152726,0.0000035288713,0.96092,0.029410133,0.0007824588,0.0003604468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025847596,0.0013379,0.86109996,0.000072762465,0.000037756043,0.00063751265,0.0011058815,0.000009780315,0.055776767,0.07704496,0.000070717535,0.00022121814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041262574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004988609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9051432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045516565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015876865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5865517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092737483","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.010","title":"Formation, representation, and activation of contextualized attitudes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Universiteit Gent","keywords":"Psychology; Attitude; Social psychology; Attitude change; Valence (chemistry); Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); Cognitive psychology; Impression formation; Context effect; Cognition; Object (grammar); Social perception; Perception; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06958428706536002,"score_gpt":0.462017454774641,"score_spread":0.392433167709281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092737483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96686476,0.00020134874,0.001783715,0.0035322648,0.0008370156,0.00010417919,8.6331147e-7,0.000010216191,0.026665661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980771,0.0000598678,0.00027032915,0.00087063486,0.00063384755,0.00000336054,0.0000012355414,0.000006107603,0.00007754005],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986349,0.00043966304,0.00047160673,0.000097702214,0.00021757481,0.0001385616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998954,0.00012388085,0.0005897294,0.000052958523,0.00021999546,0.000059436923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006084598,0.000070044254,0.00026100344,0.00009705313,0.00023662714,0.00001742031,0.00014885257,0.0001346234,0.00020203649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022953431,0.00006706201,0.00009742854,0.00014635897,0.00050625304,0.00035538865,0.000016989634,0.000105702195,0.0000035237265],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096680725,0.000848878,0.013092645,0.000012882921,0.00017316443,0.0000024083934,0.14055288,4.781866e-7,0.6145537,0.1696793,0.036790576,0.023326283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015953578,0.003800946,0.47899526,0.00013160787,0.000101483216,0.00011155665,0.1433919,0.000013269214,0.098970376,0.061684556,0.196058,0.0007874553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013919898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021024449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51558334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048202233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021817468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2734709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094327211","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2006.03.002","title":"Testing sociometer theory: Self-esteem and the importance of acceptance for social decision-making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Mediation; Social acceptance; Join (topology); Social comparison theory; Affect (linguistics); Self-esteem; Group decision-making; Self-acceptance","score_opus":0.033168391329598895,"score_gpt":0.402916695604399,"score_spread":0.3697483042748001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094327211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97585493,0.0034467047,0.0019769245,0.0010265226,0.0015227536,0.00036385798,0.000012608933,0.000021156064,0.01577456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924975,0.000009963184,0.0042102793,0.001264445,0.0018979019,0.000024137984,0.0000010718873,0.000030664953,0.000064058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979371,0.00035149977,0.0008558925,0.00023692584,0.00026669542,0.00035189456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973144,0.0011886151,0.0011535267,0.000113885704,0.00019019782,0.000039395665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015315528,0.00019144855,0.0005752655,0.00009084895,0.0006341392,0.000029859968,0.00033620707,0.00029265357,0.00020235943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001558499,0.00014519044,0.00038601967,0.00025080258,0.0006392583,0.00013082642,0.00007334185,0.00029791117,0.000003171182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020237114,0.0036557424,0.028017072,0.000052320764,0.0010966317,0.00008608332,0.08781048,0.0000022240586,0.040254697,0.6482293,0.04657365,0.12398466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026440458,0.0019285516,0.40715575,0.00009898204,0.00037289775,0.00042728643,0.028447809,0.000022747086,0.00053786795,0.5231916,0.010604614,0.0007714356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009359483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000039436654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37913868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076410266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039964616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59206945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094864682","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.007","title":"The impact of a relational mindset on information distortion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Distortion (music); Priming (agriculture); Task (project management); Psychology; Process (computing); Heuristics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Social psychology; Construal level theory; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14764099069581146,"score_gpt":0.5240087019768399,"score_spread":0.3763677112810284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094864682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9815397,0.0003827788,0.00012975179,0.0006841203,0.0020581149,0.000100456826,0.000018815756,0.0000043231144,0.015081941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993809,0.0000026692005,0.000041265495,0.00016295847,0.00027532122,0.000008043586,0.0000116279925,0.000005113722,0.00011209742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877566,0.00016659836,0.00064529985,0.000052762894,0.00020502454,0.00015466478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988645,0.000035606074,0.00073378533,0.0000872662,0.00017476459,0.000104103296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044155298,0.00007683489,0.00015163932,0.00009920298,0.000118524506,0.000009011334,0.00013011269,0.00011984095,0.00037789094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033408367,0.000051740535,0.0002661083,0.000105260035,0.00012682758,0.0002093972,0.000010431099,0.00022519803,0.00008490054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0099901175,0.0033834144,0.019848667,0.000002601804,0.0002911558,0.000011133473,0.021952828,0.000015109576,0.0026042382,0.02566581,0.8536295,0.062605396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004557421,0.00942965,0.95646894,0.000020281659,0.00002303064,0.0001434169,0.005528566,0.000004510041,0.0003190706,0.0013530038,0.022019941,0.00013218622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007544473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021216788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93662024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022106184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006959167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4137641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095482486","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.005","title":"Culture, self, and the emergence of reactance: Is there a “universal” freedom?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Reactance; Collectivism; Interdependence; Social psychology; Psychology; Individualism; Priming (agriculture); Context (archaeology); Cognition; Social environment; Cross-cultural; Sociology","score_opus":0.05815612408891186,"score_gpt":0.4159354939478982,"score_spread":0.35777936985898634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095482486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9464208,0.011281367,0.000018844547,0.0031504482,0.0009094212,0.00012515706,0.0000048051556,0.000009622457,0.03807955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719447,0.0005834979,0.00020195237,0.0011537288,0.00043068605,0.000001689137,5.6114374e-7,0.0000062981735,0.0004271146],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989033,0.00018292491,0.0004041449,0.00015149837,0.00017519618,0.00018298127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921757,0.000029440107,0.00049065374,0.00011590334,0.00008988236,0.000056524455],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020096915,0.00013821894,0.0003664873,0.00003794587,0.00012315615,0.00001287016,0.00028933916,0.00014957025,0.0013140127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008272251,0.00008067453,0.0002112076,0.00012534142,0.00034275834,0.00009809485,0.000021926102,0.000252957,0.0000085266365],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004891115,0.00199887,0.004519458,0.000009188345,0.00091186014,0.000072240284,0.29618078,2.1208457e-7,0.1820391,0.14335383,0.35744414,0.008579231],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02444147,0.0066600177,0.72545886,0.00009158645,0.00034574585,0.00086298946,0.16674368,0.000012660633,0.0070394683,0.033065423,0.034533486,0.0007446211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000042236265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015544078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7209394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015398984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009984621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096123100","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.001","title":"On the cued activation of situational motivation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Situational ethics; Cued speech; Task (project management); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Tone (literature); Intrinsic motivation; Goal pursuit","score_opus":0.13561162534802196,"score_gpt":0.4799943856168901,"score_spread":0.34438276026886816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096123100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98634976,0.00007803833,0.00068469165,0.004969574,0.0010936224,0.0001323468,0.0000043953382,0.0000053435706,0.006682202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799275,0.0000017065561,0.00010195843,0.0014896253,0.0003162346,0.000011644916,0.0000045568586,0.000009149472,0.00007236424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989038,0.00014232744,0.0005128101,0.00009464555,0.00020808568,0.00013832378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991023,0.000083944666,0.0005637597,0.00008945536,0.000119064054,0.000041487107],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027480227,0.000080962694,0.00015776524,0.000109285975,0.00013120388,0.0000054283473,0.00015407473,0.00011892008,0.001975076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044672266,0.00006035131,0.0001767763,0.00014800495,0.00012293231,0.00009401891,0.000009531408,0.00024822057,0.000038795686],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025106722,0.0070603504,0.0018071275,0.0000046173764,0.0001938689,0.000009708184,0.012708391,0.000022505115,0.30496433,0.6226979,0.03902163,0.008998927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008430279,0.0064302054,0.8689131,0.00011400186,0.000041893938,0.000084309366,0.007862972,0.0000011443288,0.066774875,0.039211404,0.0018852751,0.0002505149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034365523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000010406966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.867106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011570013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003794282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99893725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102424700","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.11.002","title":"We are, therefore they aren’t: Ingroup construal as a standard of comparison for outgroup judgments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Ingroups and outgroups; Psychology; Construal level theory; Social psychology; In-group favoritism; Trait; Social identity theory; Social group","score_opus":0.07478763889354875,"score_gpt":0.46284985170020715,"score_spread":0.3880622128066584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102424700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9407777,0.0018464708,0.00047001577,0.00915816,0.003159872,0.00042449386,0.000043137003,0.000026165368,0.044093963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99481076,0.00012304106,0.0011061518,0.0013378112,0.0023281905,0.000019363517,0.0000030791828,0.000026256814,0.0002453691],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734664,0.00037000168,0.001015346,0.0002504842,0.0005116229,0.00050590484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792016,0.00014775388,0.0013924306,0.00011890936,0.00025003115,0.00017073526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089661375,0.00021209955,0.00079893,0.00015141745,0.00043375685,0.000034800752,0.0005520191,0.0003782222,0.0008653294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121127065,0.00019095537,0.00044845932,0.00014873265,0.0009017742,0.00025667917,0.0000470342,0.00033493727,0.000020032221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014993286,0.006798777,0.034130264,0.00003857182,0.0014766536,0.00003099172,0.37742916,0.000004603304,0.09819372,0.1539264,0.1283908,0.18458676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016382845,0.010601255,0.01216808,0.00019123917,0.000175402,0.00007386613,0.30102122,0.0000051167585,0.014313474,0.06017145,0.5839679,0.0009281113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001636007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031903642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4555771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033345603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012267589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.947475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115908828","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.005","title":"Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Implicit attitude; Attitude; Implicit-association test; Social psychology; Valence (chemistry); Attitude change; Cognitive psychology; Implicit personality theory; Object (grammar); Computer science","score_opus":0.4590227538096953,"score_gpt":0.44320760524699826,"score_spread":0.015815148562697057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115908828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96534127,0.0024232792,0.0012130626,0.0091529405,0.004731784,0.0005323723,0.00003197085,0.000051051462,0.016522251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99031645,0.00090176996,0.000109717104,0.0036298262,0.0048390585,0.00004571226,0.0000019776514,0.000039091054,0.0001163928],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965571,0.00061773177,0.0008516319,0.0003476241,0.0009580671,0.0006678423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983081,0.00010934315,0.00089127343,0.00017965626,0.00026862082,0.000242976],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094075134,0.00028548803,0.00077682146,0.00029928342,0.0007987082,0.000036867434,0.00073905074,0.00047558252,0.00068103406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008901868,0.00027663843,0.0004955995,0.00025170797,0.0007050664,0.00050421595,0.00008182248,0.00046276426,0.000015642416],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019728302,0.0023175082,0.09786947,0.000023196157,0.0008915453,0.00025232154,0.53168094,2.0684246e-7,0.28493002,0.03519683,0.034847897,0.0100172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014463558,0.0067116916,0.4690643,0.0004075215,0.00032622667,0.00072241435,0.3361697,0.0000015604795,0.030092627,0.01895694,0.12047678,0.0026067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014364098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037330002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3711948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004969632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008408548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118749154","doi":"10.1006/jesp.1999.1412","title":"An Experimental Test of the Role of Alcohol in Relationship Conflict","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Feeling; Perception; Test (biology); Romance; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.046205109700711726,"score_gpt":0.4578146597701034,"score_spread":0.41160955006939165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118749154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528757,0.0019340748,0.000007745375,0.00020434287,0.0005320515,0.00018331254,0.000009814321,0.0000058397795,0.044247165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999167,0.00000839579,0.00013509755,0.00013918661,0.00020015864,0.000008464448,0.000003648245,0.000020343487,0.00031769148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998138,0.0003463025,0.0008906632,0.00016432721,0.00024560283,0.00021510654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890083,0.00013948392,0.0006227883,0.00022615802,0.000050178285,0.000060558592],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033750694,0.00014695777,0.000346299,0.00014738672,0.00010883064,0.00000643931,0.000409334,0.0002810377,0.0021750717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017517303,0.0001183473,0.00022622968,0.0002882481,0.00041028138,0.00014767224,0.000020715346,0.00042094185,0.000017178329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005450745,0.0032877878,0.70461696,0.000001764536,0.00006590001,0.000007170384,0.021098372,0.00002223393,0.26070812,0.008309414,0.00037876057,0.0009584237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036132622,0.0011111964,0.9555735,0.000023454455,0.000030994786,0.00009480007,0.013878538,0.000029464429,0.022876658,0.0013371626,0.0012612916,0.00016966907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004472116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004774779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25095654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008090112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035494213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120001707","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.015","title":"Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Communication in Education and Healthcare","field":"Psychology","cited_by":377,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Arousal; Psychology; Psychophysiology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.09383774953290457,"score_gpt":0.49290500524402303,"score_spread":0.39906725571111845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120001707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93306607,0.0016004462,0.000009746528,0.040594157,0.0016320486,0.00017019453,5.187728e-7,0.000012183341,0.02291461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885668,0.000060490052,0.000117675874,0.010206021,0.00084670784,0.00001658492,0.0000013578666,0.000013826704,0.00017051744],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981717,0.0005761413,0.0006050889,0.00016257078,0.00020845108,0.00027604544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987859,0.0002144205,0.0005242689,0.00033744494,0.00007886941,0.00005906845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083074137,0.00014305166,0.00022311865,0.00013430006,0.0005015655,0.000036532976,0.0006377356,0.0001506879,0.00036131596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005598676,0.00009247018,0.00011454068,0.00025231877,0.00018226162,0.000098814955,0.00003163485,0.0009886367,0.00003926398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018733992,0.0029438715,0.009661274,0.000007893245,0.0001284424,0.000023572364,0.2839529,0.000008199254,0.45179683,0.03228978,0.05582076,0.1614931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010532568,0.0009897547,0.93885416,0.000036909285,0.000007320966,0.00013528453,0.043699156,0.000010739572,0.0004359723,0.001143075,0.013500072,0.00013429414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000048736674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006020599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9291929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015633897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006119569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42951897},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"bench_or_experimental","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2120451614","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.013","title":"Reducing implicit prejudice: Matching approach/avoidance strategies to contextual valence and regulatory focus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Regulatory focus theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Valence (chemistry); Psychological intervention; Matching (statistics); Context (archaeology); Implicit attitude; Implicit-association test","score_opus":0.06411293016934111,"score_gpt":0.39270534428425785,"score_spread":0.32859241411491674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120451614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89733505,0.0013732706,0.0014090094,0.00085095403,0.0013622274,0.00020379605,0.0000028951024,0.00003103971,0.097431764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99566954,0.00007001757,0.0018828174,0.0010120667,0.001207563,0.000014313759,3.2172923e-7,0.000021096892,0.00012223092],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792594,0.0004015148,0.00056409114,0.00032290316,0.00031280672,0.00047273425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901825,0.000056367368,0.00044135904,0.00011909606,0.00012482355,0.00024011644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086611934,0.00018426735,0.00042156846,0.00013449744,0.0006089107,0.000063511994,0.00045832287,0.00026280302,0.00021439702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004644457,0.00018320017,0.00015122183,0.00021141849,0.00079397316,0.00049511384,0.00007385486,0.00037403175,0.000011919125],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009336056,0.000785966,0.0013865477,0.000009173268,0.00018416479,0.000040117608,0.5707989,8.74531e-7,0.28137508,0.12070443,0.011166231,0.012614974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036251766,0.0032491973,0.21217084,0.00012520528,0.000086681066,0.00035027112,0.6823745,0.0000016326892,0.008570217,0.07820512,0.01014752,0.0010936621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013721958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000074531265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27280486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013994859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010020545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74706864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135449386","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1505","title":"Self-Esteem, Mood, and Intentions to Use Condoms: When Does Low Self-Esteem Lead to Risky Health Behaviors?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Self-esteem; Negative mood; Mood; Condom; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.12701313205981662,"score_gpt":0.48507021940782985,"score_spread":0.3580570873480132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135449386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9560016,0.0007783333,0.00027921464,0.035773985,0.004439702,0.0016054205,0.000035592868,0.00009886833,0.0009873166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.972927,0.00028283824,0.0065083317,0.016430499,0.0019082043,0.00007068403,0.0000028884242,0.000060933507,0.0018086411],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582446,0.0010134045,0.0013496177,0.00053663994,0.00043697417,0.00083888875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976524,0.00015321701,0.00084374234,0.0002760605,0.00032144293,0.000753138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010266394,0.00030598082,0.00078093994,0.00029903764,0.0012906397,0.000025686466,0.00027316643,0.0002988393,0.00046666592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012558779,0.00023365635,0.00015675793,0.00026421496,0.00014476413,0.0003144341,0.00017692069,0.0011028041,0.00022426924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025146755,0.026168438,0.15177613,0.0005492052,0.0005833554,0.00012193609,0.3979526,0.0000017067449,0.06967692,0.002303978,0.34422183,0.004129233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02025186,0.019636316,0.54250896,0.0011358754,0.00025016518,0.00057336094,0.14996335,0.00001711698,0.001794166,0.0014394576,0.2604094,0.0020199472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016329426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007910263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39073282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060339685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014480062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9926688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137636713","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.011","title":"Threat, high self-esteem, and reactive approach-motivation: Electroencephalographic evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Offensive; Social psychology; Self-esteem; Psychological resilience; Salience (neuroscience); Ideology; Interpretation (philosophy); Norm (philosophy); Deviance (statistics); Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04199030283745142,"score_gpt":0.3751806746611957,"score_spread":0.3331903718237443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137636713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96885884,0.0052476255,0.0003230232,0.0028438752,0.0009966133,0.00021553933,0.0000016088966,0.000043649667,0.021469237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995059,0.00031406773,0.00092186616,0.0024882192,0.001100782,0.000007942657,0.0000022140946,0.000015492562,0.00009039112],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981227,0.0003492338,0.0005145954,0.00032830116,0.00029683227,0.00038836861],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895763,0.00011229835,0.0005136694,0.00014162903,0.00012628877,0.00014850718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004818296,0.00021788442,0.00044391703,0.00016786244,0.0003500944,0.000032784315,0.00026481767,0.0003438103,0.00017987816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043296426,0.00020139923,0.00020737258,0.00035117264,0.00023769544,0.00036428543,0.000028526994,0.00054363854,0.000011302847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010223209,0.01782388,0.030591145,0.000028713404,0.0016551783,0.0006565264,0.14954264,0.0000018419751,0.39682892,0.29461706,0.037418246,0.060612652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040018796,0.007236946,0.95674896,0.00004745832,0.00012308397,0.0011777639,0.007438307,0.0000018858185,0.001179618,0.019218983,0.0023541087,0.00047103217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000030067675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.4678275e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9261578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010248384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003900364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82128227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138099018","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.015","title":"Impressions at the intersection of ambiguous and obvious social categories: Does gay + Black = likable?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; Social perception; Impression formation; Sexual orientation; White (mutation); Social desirability","score_opus":0.06887726771547059,"score_gpt":0.40209274099621173,"score_spread":0.33321547328074114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138099018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94146943,0.00050750544,0.000044169832,0.0018230623,0.0033011972,0.00014477145,0.0000058449323,0.000015057199,0.052688934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970658,0.00015520945,0.000047295693,0.00066742685,0.0013976183,0.000007982483,8.9198625e-7,0.00001677264,0.0006410084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980837,0.0005165114,0.0005733509,0.00019806002,0.00028314607,0.00034524655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887836,0.0000626072,0.0007030614,0.00009098334,0.00016285756,0.00010215267],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059859187,0.00015580263,0.0003802903,0.00007712047,0.00093193504,0.000022046153,0.0003707122,0.00031959664,0.0012419142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060957118,0.00010384916,0.00025034667,0.00019639637,0.002604288,0.00019451513,0.000101538986,0.00033547252,0.000012240418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017003649,0.0010941173,0.0044094273,0.0000081445205,0.0003416621,0.000028374277,0.7518823,5.335336e-8,0.17445284,0.016745726,0.038215,0.01112198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050481814,0.0031837202,0.2043818,0.000047896392,0.00021861744,0.00012179482,0.6635171,0.0000012837528,0.030102408,0.039605994,0.053042587,0.0007286087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00190036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00062134187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19997238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019890499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006379536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143749501","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.017","title":"Red enhances women's attractiveness to men: First evidence suggesting universality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Attraction; Psychology; Social psychology; Universality (dynamical systems); Interpersonal attraction; Physical attractiveness; Linguistics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.10433067721870762,"score_gpt":0.4447905451060879,"score_spread":0.34045986788738025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143749501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97239107,0.001695443,0.00026345858,0.002968567,0.004657985,0.0002013014,0.0000054770408,0.000032354503,0.017784355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957818,0.000016838678,0.00048080727,0.0011145807,0.0018259452,0.00004439343,0.0000013897153,0.000028492706,0.0007057815],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742275,0.0005506658,0.00065960764,0.00032474927,0.00028551515,0.0007567129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842864,0.00024614233,0.00060607743,0.00023900454,0.0001363597,0.00034376382],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001221929,0.00024490838,0.00047874256,0.00022272671,0.00045108912,0.000016696162,0.00049331854,0.0003083981,0.0062505584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006526165,0.00024848664,0.00019223486,0.0002772587,0.00033300318,0.00060841447,0.00007111251,0.0005174498,0.0002912163],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010196923,0.009502869,0.17462775,0.000022452396,0.0007366322,0.00031335943,0.1603422,0.0000042354563,0.49385196,0.012227977,0.13405864,0.0041149976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018107801,0.0015103349,0.9499643,0.00005219625,0.000048987822,0.00045102747,0.019305313,1.1323629e-7,0.002553957,0.00023389896,0.023696247,0.00037283855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019886325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000026739635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77533656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046462307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003554026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148553115","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.003","title":"On preferences and doing the right thing: Satisfaction with advantageous inequity when cognitive processing is limited","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Preference; Social psychology; Social cognition; Outcome (game theory); Cognitive resource theory; Social preferences; Cognitive psychology; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.03614128491333945,"score_gpt":0.39895059045913694,"score_spread":0.3628093055457975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148553115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95705116,0.00068329676,0.00021658097,0.0092337,0.00047903252,0.00017492015,0.0000026030195,0.00002036525,0.032138325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99318725,0.00007059626,0.00026124212,0.0051477207,0.0012146237,0.000007766519,6.231126e-7,0.000011852779,0.00009831062],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984525,0.0003659937,0.0003316906,0.00020673686,0.00035504234,0.00028804687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990844,0.00014635346,0.00048582754,0.000049791397,0.00014590127,0.00008774023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047990034,0.00014706892,0.00025691188,0.00008445471,0.0010263284,0.00009123331,0.00018756748,0.00017777663,0.0004642156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050973373,0.00009565619,0.00007667199,0.00014581264,0.0007891897,0.000413088,0.000025628411,0.00043135654,0.000009348898],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027806088,0.00083976693,0.014539711,0.000007314416,0.00028226044,0.00003850376,0.519112,7.163473e-7,0.008795767,0.008448932,0.008818303,0.43633613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014841839,0.014864971,0.43981123,0.0006587372,0.00042889794,0.00068215927,0.37393978,0.000028670014,0.0062151444,0.043432225,0.10341959,0.001676749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002019883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063552207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4346594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000117725525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006556643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7893792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153548469","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.018","title":"Smiling and sad wrinkles: Age-related changes in the face and the perception of emotions and intentions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Psychology; Perception; CLARITY; Social perception; Facial expression; Face perception; Impression formation; Social psychology; Face (sociological concept); Emotion perception; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.06609084968808818,"score_gpt":0.41272569094156003,"score_spread":0.3466348412534719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153548469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985647,0.005794571,0.000034075125,0.0047188173,0.0007105775,0.00018883891,0.0000038375465,0.000004465148,0.0028978114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987975,0.00025199365,0.00006414775,0.00053497194,0.0002182504,0.000016059137,0.0000018462546,0.000008287744,0.00010697764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986507,0.0005531563,0.0003705745,0.00012412862,0.00010855774,0.00019287705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945354,0.00012294117,0.0002554029,0.000095879186,0.000029888126,0.00004235845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009399105,0.00010738628,0.00024034949,0.0001338491,0.0002502748,0.000010639223,0.00012527505,0.00017805786,0.00026665285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015290505,0.000070882765,0.00006740215,0.00010015886,0.0013803799,0.00010677633,0.000034802426,0.00040024193,0.0000034775735],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017910633,0.003502877,0.15600549,0.000017532893,0.00041200768,0.00003943578,0.6219397,4.64941e-7,0.09846848,0.1017624,0.0056729983,0.010387547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028452652,0.00028068866,0.9191494,0.000013861086,0.00006016583,0.00070895697,0.07533577,7.238463e-7,0.00001035709,0.001233368,0.0002938063,0.00006764961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022281814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002250837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7631439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019850948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004503127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50860673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159229527","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.006","title":"Intergroup contact facilitates physiological recovery following stressful intergroup interactions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Psychology; Anxiety; Task (project management); Reactivity (psychology); Developmental psychology; Psychological resilience; Social psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.049178802319236777,"score_gpt":0.42611873061491484,"score_spread":0.3769399282956781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159229527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94757354,0.00023689125,0.00017069392,0.0041077943,0.018212263,0.00016292541,0.000008922999,0.000053981847,0.029472986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99423254,0.0000473476,0.00034668922,0.0016853587,0.0032085588,0.00001767138,0.000005260673,0.00002446068,0.00043213234],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972286,0.00058949564,0.0008724736,0.00035514846,0.00037262184,0.00058161316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985515,0.00026414695,0.0006114379,0.00016493618,0.00016709037,0.00024091614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000767201,0.00026645235,0.0006240147,0.00021397875,0.0006614736,0.00009745031,0.00075371657,0.0004285876,0.0027064146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031512437,0.00024124625,0.00088139926,0.0002635894,0.00065831596,0.00067844184,0.00009837059,0.0012597775,0.00010603891],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061889115,0.0011912925,0.0023211674,0.0000022195786,0.00033011351,0.00007493421,0.023258945,1.2870225e-7,0.91994536,0.006884786,0.03878719,0.006584969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009675224,0.008730339,0.16400874,0.00018090708,0.0002274228,0.00033577942,0.2153222,0.0000059457416,0.013999455,0.03569287,0.5497498,0.0020713008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003177284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037272918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9059459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020053724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007359953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167879529","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.03.003","title":"Typicality and group variability as dual moderators of category-based inferences","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Group (periodic table); Dual (grammatical number); Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.09181674308776397,"score_gpt":0.4410116270600881,"score_spread":0.3491948839723241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167879529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935607,0.00037263363,0.00034861988,0.00086961617,0.00083364215,0.00009919315,0.000008394912,0.000009498146,0.0038977223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988098,0.0000067707256,0.00034244495,0.0005626255,0.0002495636,0.000005173947,0.0000028109182,0.0000081426515,0.000012628185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985107,0.00029265243,0.00057750166,0.00021645214,0.00019288377,0.00020982116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920714,0.00006921287,0.0004115617,0.00010881804,0.00009371741,0.000109558736],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003834034,0.00015636766,0.0004237196,0.00006216318,0.00010541246,0.000018587269,0.00015181478,0.00022337999,0.00106671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036860794,0.00011971446,0.00016258846,0.00010746119,0.0004726909,0.00009830202,0.000030059302,0.00026019168,0.000010357299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062813936,0.009965412,0.11473272,0.000055087115,0.00086621783,0.00012950462,0.04053048,0.000016120552,0.33303592,0.48308194,0.0026849904,0.008620205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062595354,0.0038923996,0.88865876,0.000024076244,0.00006868091,0.00012612336,0.006628631,0.0000038693233,0.0072860634,0.086375125,0.00035256043,0.0003241761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029747593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001191446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.773926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054147775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004994355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235563052","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.08.005","title":"Time, money, and happiness: Does putting a price on time affect our ability to smell the roses?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Happiness; Economics; Monetary economics; Psychology; Keynesian economics; Social psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.02971992071340533,"score_gpt":0.41195107998539693,"score_spread":0.3822311592719916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235563052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9263918,0.0001658085,0.000055748562,0.053550437,0.0011336202,0.0003772959,0.000008147322,0.0000380562,0.018279128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929541,0.000034348992,0.00031159012,0.0040929345,0.0016430885,0.000015718419,1.7572059e-7,0.000020316425,0.0009277313],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711645,0.0010389037,0.00050467503,0.0003633209,0.00044806852,0.0005285891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984974,0.00040391966,0.0005132054,0.00018732503,0.00015494281,0.00024317436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025923369,0.00021109016,0.00042324662,0.00010618695,0.0008978122,0.00006443265,0.00064110605,0.00027642155,0.00027111822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005752381,0.00012120853,0.0001851287,0.00029034168,0.0010232585,0.0003062787,0.00009535051,0.0003052448,0.00026335128],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004867736,0.00066110305,0.0029212607,0.0000037602772,0.00011577104,0.00003210582,0.028486306,5.623531e-7,0.92288166,0.0019809334,0.026515918,0.015913842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013623856,0.0078034783,0.7025862,0.00056683033,0.00020691393,0.0002489774,0.069741815,0.000005289856,0.03849803,0.03477254,0.12937859,0.0025675294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007544673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012357718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8843836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026444354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008171311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6905336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270004246","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.002","title":"Nice guys finish first when presented second: Responsive daters are evaluated more positively following exposure to unresponsive daters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Attractiveness; Physical attractiveness; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Romance; Developmental psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.05568576189255272,"score_gpt":0.4131268397038133,"score_spread":0.3574410778112606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270004246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96937907,0.00082200806,0.00017812675,0.020612387,0.005541876,0.0005750279,0.0002037406,0.000058876383,0.0026289194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872244,0.000006711994,0.00034206494,0.006596195,0.0007620337,0.000090562455,0.000018098908,0.000083835264,0.004876117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952212,0.0014006377,0.0011758294,0.00081538485,0.0005385512,0.0008483933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972656,0.00045454924,0.0009938702,0.00053486,0.0003704007,0.00038076],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009340405,0.00048853765,0.0008345941,0.0005990026,0.0005576965,0.000040402203,0.00093124545,0.00060239295,0.0068428502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017547142,0.0004086897,0.00055702525,0.00029329336,0.0005258072,0.0004626789,0.00017225723,0.0005780611,0.00050567085],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0250716,0.0019473662,0.035487227,0.0000061347096,0.0016206024,0.0025905303,0.039286744,0.0000018593306,0.40236148,0.0006043928,0.49013945,0.000882615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011971302,0.004389101,0.9334997,0.00015729359,0.00019914047,0.0008652956,0.0137926685,1.9915355e-7,0.0034724206,0.00040160518,0.03052636,0.00072493573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017266417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000028299784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89801246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036260425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093157825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274005395","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.012","title":"When possessions become part of the self: Ownership and implicit self-object linking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Psychology; Social psychology; Associative property; Association (psychology); Perception; Representation (politics); Self; Mental representation; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04749759309534253,"score_gpt":0.3981284027876566,"score_spread":0.3506308096923141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274005395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9589469,0.00050668063,0.000021739086,0.018036788,0.0031468899,0.00015289271,0.0000050287595,0.000027445363,0.019155623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996125,0.00018329981,0.00023915072,0.0014273899,0.0017415014,0.0000055722267,1.724154e-7,0.000015178286,0.00026277447],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997925,0.0006329547,0.00055734627,0.00019078988,0.0003295378,0.0003644076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873966,0.0002098512,0.00066553126,0.00012637317,0.00013299202,0.00012558422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007881527,0.00013887987,0.00036033057,0.000083653096,0.00056942436,0.000024043133,0.00050860445,0.00028961033,0.0004112424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009009547,0.00008064224,0.00026701408,0.00017892294,0.0006705767,0.00021263081,0.00009089159,0.00025139988,0.000007809695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005399173,0.002182199,0.10775083,0.00001540942,0.00074473897,0.000025723706,0.23251256,3.4329492e-8,0.5212016,0.0571002,0.058778554,0.019148223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008779479,0.002575893,0.4362689,0.00036967057,0.00025274794,0.00024720439,0.059249856,3.907451e-7,0.014771353,0.06896288,0.40758327,0.0009383403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009757287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005818998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50643027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015291457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001223946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45028156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295220506","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.08.006","title":"Attachment avoidance and amends-making: A case advocating the need for attempting to replicate one's own work","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Replicate; Work (physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09399187242667857,"score_gpt":0.469692033772605,"score_spread":0.37570016134592643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295220506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9162825,0.0010957518,0.037880298,0.038836088,0.0006681595,0.00096918386,0.000015645906,0.000054295397,0.0041981307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986469,0.000017824224,0.0068314876,0.005119266,0.0008575975,0.00039479623,4.015781e-7,0.000038779053,0.0002708947],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998387,0.00013862095,0.0006242599,0.00035049027,0.00012899499,0.00037063414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986311,0.0002451443,0.0006216201,0.00031437792,0.000082398474,0.00010534692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007044808,0.00017924952,0.00030442336,0.000090318834,0.00040493283,0.000033806322,0.00031115196,0.00013320649,0.0001840595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002486428,0.000117866846,0.0001573973,0.00020921785,0.00017346042,0.000065251974,0.00004442667,0.00019102251,0.000013157225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026765428,0.001310303,0.0038946192,0.000008445612,0.00047260142,0.00009514481,0.02016193,3.7701017e-7,0.63249046,0.021712452,0.09484912,0.222328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019125503,0.008142537,0.055374723,0.0007035052,0.00025746317,0.009692635,0.02753823,0.0000050523395,0.032282434,0.016791737,0.8279972,0.0020889833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000103975135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000021591823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7331481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009546807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000012959061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48064706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309036171","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.001","title":"The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Pipeline (software); Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Applied psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22162705453350162,"score_gpt":0.4530841344992813,"score_spread":0.2314570799657797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309036171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9059494,0.00058100704,0.0007894617,0.080491476,0.001348721,0.0005116818,0.00004997582,0.000025369867,0.010252892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969479,0.000114531525,0.00013803336,0.0010850028,0.0005768238,0.00003139524,0.0000012000032,0.000014080696,0.0010910307],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973174,0.00063389493,0.00075951486,0.00029842995,0.0006719098,0.00031888226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796146,0.00036410717,0.00064763846,0.00028777408,0.0006588661,0.00008015033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015959742,0.00011267189,0.00020816682,0.00020241473,0.00040862462,0.00002746982,0.0006393173,0.00013414145,0.000112618516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000816315,0.00006566245,0.00011794626,0.0005003002,0.00085452903,0.00021365953,0.00009257074,0.00029357514,0.00003568755],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004763586,0.0011220458,0.00011833917,0.0000014212914,0.000008794287,0.0000037638197,0.00045658145,9.038791e-8,0.89942825,0.0039788554,0.09042115,0.0039843796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026301823,0.0014575784,0.010268741,0.000036515303,0.000010805059,0.0001635717,0.00068822125,0.000003578989,0.8648837,0.004480807,0.11521619,0.00016006397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007824987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028480456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09099849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015572755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011458088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31485477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470426344","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.009","title":"How people can become persuaded by weak messages presented by credible communicators: Not all sleeper effects are created equal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Institute of Nursing Research; National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Persuasion; Recall; Regulatory focus theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Focus (optics); Persuasive communication; Attitude change; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.042066787516796655,"score_gpt":0.3865237570538833,"score_spread":0.34445696953708665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470426344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8773628,0.004928083,0.00015712161,0.10451264,0.0031437366,0.00043458867,0.00009496553,0.00008159799,0.009284469],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920988,0.00060556305,0.000044124245,0.0038088441,0.0010880309,0.000036982354,0.000012441613,0.000050429873,0.0022547753],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598545,0.001563495,0.0006193977,0.00039731796,0.00059301185,0.00084133254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977715,0.0004465528,0.00090247503,0.00026760943,0.00021881142,0.00039305649],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069621747,0.000340229,0.0008129102,0.0001581718,0.000714206,0.00012350616,0.0010039592,0.00061582256,0.0005791766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029385585,0.00026727174,0.00041830918,0.00032148938,0.0011460069,0.00046317157,0.00013864643,0.00050774816,0.000026999456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042931884,0.0009025054,0.0035711227,0.000004314509,0.000320952,0.000016945272,0.013389188,6.1887335e-9,0.5221757,0.00086315384,0.45783052,0.00049627223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017050585,0.004478771,0.016283065,0.00018770946,0.00021778661,0.000104197774,0.14661507,7.3587074e-7,0.09029627,0.0015218549,0.721791,0.0014529391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013393741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005038501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43187943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000569222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006802554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517219323","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.08.003","title":"Culture as automatic processes for making meaning: Spontaneous trait inferences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Trait; Psychology; Unconscious mind; Meaning (existential); Recall; Social psychology; Impression formation; Meaning-making; Cognitive psychology; Social perception; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.12388911477168273,"score_gpt":0.46884148297293415,"score_spread":0.3449523682012514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517219323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9756532,0.0015395131,0.00034039275,0.0021305436,0.001893889,0.00025696316,0.000021696724,0.000043071734,0.018120786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962523,0.000027155622,0.0006161502,0.0007766167,0.0010720954,0.000031764404,0.000001874908,0.000021580707,0.0012004568],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849194,0.00011898187,0.0005827325,0.00024622487,0.00019592958,0.00036416028],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988869,0.00014356001,0.0005969681,0.00009063377,0.0001954336,0.00008649407],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017944504,0.0002200718,0.00044698396,0.00008283791,0.00019615663,0.00004489646,0.00037577294,0.00023522931,0.0023269232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012220588,0.00012686316,0.0002465468,0.00012551223,0.00018412169,0.00017562183,0.000025309235,0.00014657826,0.000042023523],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004141081,0.0029358303,0.0052848053,0.00012637554,0.0015175962,0.00074883044,0.15172017,2.4485558e-7,0.460489,0.09878163,0.10924329,0.16501115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03910077,0.041980866,0.24002928,0.0019330174,0.000898484,0.037843853,0.1563165,0.000007891075,0.023370719,0.2545452,0.19983388,0.0041395305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000083013365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010574646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4371183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072314964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005439847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985851},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519235992","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.004","title":"Replications with MTurkers who are naïve versus experienced with academic studies: A comment on Connors, Khamitov, Moroz, Campbell, and Henderson (2015)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Neural Networks and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Python (programming language); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Human intelligence; Artificial neural network; Cognition; Tree (set theory); Bayesian probability; Machine learning; Psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08002235431030248,"score_gpt":0.4121358960628001,"score_spread":0.33211354175249763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519235992","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88180274,0.0021334034,0.018301807,0.09605236,0.000647841,0.00047989763,0.0000066505218,0.00005328406,0.00052203465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937881,0.00031599504,0.001581979,0.0039389217,0.00025534077,0.00006570404,3.9053847e-7,0.000013230774,0.00004028717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986893,0.00008563601,0.00032340482,0.00036411264,0.00026901774,0.0002685339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987702,0.00016412791,0.0005426122,0.00027098294,0.00011145492,0.00014065424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013988937,0.00018394605,0.00032511182,0.00007316303,0.00032306436,0.00003137177,0.0004395021,0.000090230176,0.0000085753845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011243928,0.000108108085,0.00005253101,0.00021838228,0.0004244142,0.00028380248,0.00007718724,0.00025598003,0.00000287362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011511434,0.0028838364,0.005828789,0.00003094132,0.0020008367,0.0003197779,0.08067905,0.000090693036,0.19515646,0.11955506,0.5359636,0.045979556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.13094251,0.073308066,0.054616258,0.0033448264,0.0005204805,0.0036840132,0.28272155,0.00067416974,0.14664654,0.009457447,0.287284,0.0068001617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004443386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000030559363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2486796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014931611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031985637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.440852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531088400","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.002","title":"Ask in person: You're less persuasive than you think over email","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Compliance (psychology); Moderation; Social psychology; Empathy; Internet privacy; Ask price; Instant messaging; Face-to-face; Face (sociological concept); Computer-mediated communication; World Wide Web; Computer science; The Internet","score_opus":0.08456002414087817,"score_gpt":0.43590123212049947,"score_spread":0.3513412079796213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531088400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9047598,0.0012311082,0.00003062255,0.022059437,0.0029646226,0.00020984007,0.000009972913,0.00003252825,0.068702035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99340886,0.00020052437,0.0001992086,0.002781796,0.0021745695,0.000009982024,5.612e-7,0.000030152487,0.0011943681],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996744,0.00074806396,0.0006446332,0.0004069519,0.00069567544,0.0007606862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985267,0.00016401907,0.00070453354,0.00017700996,0.00017804545,0.00024969404],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013653758,0.00026326996,0.0005829739,0.0002516891,0.00059896114,0.00005004617,0.00086468906,0.00061153824,0.0014434963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021090604,0.00021808177,0.00038145762,0.00039467914,0.0019198833,0.00071180024,0.000058390146,0.00053517695,0.00008945585],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002093636,0.0024266448,0.119725004,0.000008257219,0.0004077138,0.00076934445,0.54085326,4.584251e-7,0.21874125,0.02796098,0.057845034,0.029168395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011122885,0.0014617349,0.443549,0.00018771531,0.00005870218,0.00011259546,0.47577345,4.4841238e-7,0.0021895724,0.009727652,0.054741733,0.0010745248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077987096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00048385162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.323824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070838275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026019826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554083386","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.003","title":"Does exposure to erotica reduce attraction and love for romantic partners in men? Independent replications of Kenrick, Gutierres, and Goldberg (1989) study 2","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Psychology; Attraction; Social psychology; Romance; Physical attractiveness; Sexual attraction; Interpersonal attraction; Developmental psychology; Sexual behavior; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.06626889858945938,"score_gpt":0.4553643635573397,"score_spread":0.38909546496788033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554083386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9935323,0.00041206586,0.000096932316,0.0033105207,0.0009783581,0.0006947668,0.000012065238,0.000011105397,0.00095185626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987605,0.000023553052,0.0001947374,0.00013898099,0.0001876493,0.000068510344,9.2018036e-7,0.000020544983,0.0006045735],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821013,0.00022121347,0.0007452161,0.0003866326,0.00016113107,0.0002756649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989622,0.00014135445,0.0004619038,0.00024814243,0.00008744023,0.000098929115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005586442,0.00016221561,0.00044414483,0.00029388678,0.000065985,0.00001048973,0.00019123057,0.000269192,0.00011767842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006918518,0.00010989375,0.00006837291,0.0001576366,0.000248642,0.000102134436,0.000057547448,0.00019881118,0.0000051081493],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024731995,0.0061415974,0.26276484,0.000010354028,0.0003339089,0.000046891557,0.027896402,1.2984756e-7,0.67431784,0.0066090995,0.004392128,0.015013567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007727935,0.0058582076,0.92684597,0.000028184973,0.00009584313,0.00017200282,0.046864446,1.9045916e-7,0.008337427,0.0016499166,0.0021773255,0.00024256248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010428549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007665093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66598046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009825686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022205624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4481337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577827438","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.005","title":"When God's (not) needed: Spotlight on how belief in divine control influences goal commitment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Religiosity; Social psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Self-efficacy; Set (abstract data type); Contingency; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.057158888567429095,"score_gpt":0.424743244923401,"score_spread":0.36758435635597186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577827438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8316179,0.0008468447,0.000019485402,0.13089202,0.0037299078,0.00028206702,0.000009386944,0.000016830658,0.032585558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847289,0.00016061869,0.00009065429,0.012094979,0.002539662,0.00001592334,0.000001207481,0.000019556132,0.0003485393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969965,0.00076358824,0.0007033896,0.00032459502,0.0006242473,0.00058768067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980472,0.00016241071,0.0011163128,0.0003252104,0.00012265248,0.00022622396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016998914,0.00024682382,0.00068340386,0.00020313918,0.0012368022,0.0002371152,0.0011684787,0.00041021852,0.000325715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020895679,0.00022194057,0.0003005967,0.00008597714,0.001299922,0.00042190574,0.00005972435,0.0005367188,0.00004296376],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061924886,0.0063564153,0.24790974,0.000015457717,0.00064449233,0.0006861225,0.16725674,0.0000048346933,0.04368799,0.058533177,0.4571677,0.011544828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013378228,0.002551663,0.7672638,0.00008242247,0.000052247487,0.000050815866,0.028118161,0.000001139698,0.0015893641,0.012992421,0.17326944,0.00065030286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002785462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011997243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51935405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027867907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000111657006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9512608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605644184","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003","title":"Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another's opinions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":381,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ideology; Cognitive dissonance; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Presidential election; Presidential system; Variety (cybernetics); Positive economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.11332946039765963,"score_gpt":0.44642561985555507,"score_spread":0.33309615945789545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605644184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90148854,0.00033256726,0.00015184125,0.077762514,0.0020931617,0.0002877548,0.000019381376,0.000022817023,0.017841443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98378956,0.00005039222,0.0006202132,0.013221328,0.001669721,0.000015321728,9.2790344e-7,0.000022486183,0.00061002123],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815136,0.00039344796,0.00046658097,0.00027788588,0.00029640872,0.00041432938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860036,0.0000769324,0.00060555537,0.00019167435,0.00021857776,0.00030691462],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055265886,0.00017456364,0.00049177546,0.00013628014,0.0015332818,0.00018226533,0.0006677959,0.00027143527,0.00041030181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040970894,0.00017436706,0.0001462314,0.00013798289,0.00073252147,0.0003829653,0.00011725883,0.00028534236,0.00003619687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017770793,0.0018505438,0.04935458,0.000008718079,0.0004105244,0.000086079985,0.20705321,4.5053963e-7,0.50444317,0.017969687,0.21039389,0.006652045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028814166,0.0027582261,0.7741422,0.000117829906,0.00002607223,0.0000212201,0.033449303,1.09972866e-7,0.003733017,0.0054053525,0.17698607,0.00047918645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023245279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019290601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7247876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103166305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058498183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745399087","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.007","title":"Configural processing and social judgments: Face inversion particularly disrupts inferences of human-relevant traits","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Trait; Social cognition; Social perception; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Face perception; Perception; Social psychology; Trustworthiness; Dominance (genetics); Neuroscience","score_opus":0.10257790081811852,"score_gpt":0.4480112312210825,"score_spread":0.345433330402964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745399087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883737,0.0011081372,0.00004481369,0.0016736309,0.0012232502,0.0001539856,0.000014116847,0.000011847749,0.007396548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986507,0.000009222627,0.00007076776,0.00034867827,0.0005021269,0.000011753288,0.0000043000837,0.000018949935,0.00038349177],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813825,0.00023282474,0.0007285077,0.0002982571,0.00025694506,0.0003452285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982106,0.000025341524,0.0013907485,0.00014960089,0.00013077143,0.000092906244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035032595,0.00021779677,0.00052934437,0.00013020558,0.0011890709,0.00005865102,0.00046555515,0.00035177852,0.0007008901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014190877,0.00020220867,0.0001904339,0.000040563198,0.0014715896,0.00042442494,0.00007301876,0.0004305115,0.000016432978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021639746,0.004497125,0.057404004,0.000047239788,0.0005566246,0.00023548296,0.08220814,1.547656e-7,0.78850836,0.022962084,0.0218724,0.019544432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051616714,0.0015991834,0.97635144,0.00004358207,0.00011651677,0.0001244283,0.011452202,9.700215e-7,0.0021272367,0.0015571255,0.0011960322,0.0002695903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002304513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000548061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91894746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047532812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037545466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91454923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748746790","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.007","title":"Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Impact of Technology on Adolescents","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":397,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Psychology; Experience sampling method; Phone; Social psychology; Globe; Face (sociological concept); Advertising; Sociology","score_opus":0.11186482078267161,"score_gpt":0.4840579868031979,"score_spread":0.37219316602052627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748746790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96900636,0.000078918536,0.00025709727,0.019808445,0.003112778,0.00021872512,0.000012652435,0.000025801588,0.0074792486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99691755,0.000026031867,0.00047097538,0.00079682487,0.0008352534,0.0000046061505,7.630343e-7,0.00001919634,0.0009287901],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998166,0.00021281767,0.00057101133,0.00018590056,0.00045248863,0.00041173515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822235,0.000050750663,0.0011756144,0.00021588939,0.00017478748,0.0001605861],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046481212,0.0001677689,0.0004539969,0.00019098878,0.0016435408,0.00012395873,0.0009373718,0.00026446825,0.0002739841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003198659,0.00017198284,0.00027288438,0.00012292703,0.0010806056,0.0005794234,0.00016547173,0.00038258688,0.000034122146],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018001038,0.004612045,0.036448,0.000013690435,0.00066579744,0.00010997299,0.099516205,0.0000022063798,0.66645974,0.006882708,0.16122496,0.022264551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071371463,0.001479598,0.7308615,0.00012850079,0.00013254122,0.00009669559,0.085245,0.0000020114767,0.08817096,0.002518204,0.08340245,0.0008254377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004374554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019116771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6944135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000330503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010999255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756176742","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.08.001","title":"Intergroup dissimilarity predicts physiological synchrony and affiliation in intergroup interaction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Friendship; Similarity (geometry); Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Interpersonal relationship; Interpersonal interaction; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.0842953947277413,"score_gpt":0.4655309299338072,"score_spread":0.3812355352060659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756176742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97336745,0.0002666595,0.00009348863,0.005604352,0.0038214363,0.00014365022,0.0000025606028,0.000016639819,0.016683733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972231,0.00025189365,0.00009771242,0.0007052302,0.0016199318,0.000009881824,0.0000018307344,0.000011581796,0.00007887233],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981243,0.0004635573,0.000564519,0.00026898843,0.0002395574,0.00033905133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987956,0.00006784581,0.0007763136,0.0001438152,0.00008660138,0.00012977542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074746244,0.00016164282,0.0004123367,0.00013509126,0.0007244592,0.00012518659,0.0005264329,0.0003556418,0.00031530918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002857985,0.00014954437,0.00016519819,0.00007479402,0.0010412474,0.000761839,0.0001274217,0.00052974885,0.000009067706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005502722,0.006662341,0.21873423,0.000032994627,0.0004840553,0.00034477437,0.18319604,0.0000013130972,0.40320015,0.04965891,0.055854566,0.07632792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002528197,0.001188185,0.9637806,0.00007391942,0.000018095216,0.000036611666,0.017974319,0.000012008015,0.00055264094,0.005948163,0.007634227,0.00025302498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004596614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053799787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7450464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002770537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035460456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6098243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761837102","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.010","title":"Personal conflict impairs performance on an unrelated self-control task: Lingering costs of uncertainty and conflict","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Anagrams; Anagram; Psychology; CLARITY; Task (project management); Control (management); Social psychology; Self-control; Ego depletion; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06916744215110165,"score_gpt":0.44896161210556423,"score_spread":0.3797941699544626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761837102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99252206,0.0010413093,0.000012865345,0.00046402434,0.0018263303,0.00021468822,0.000029238963,0.000018611616,0.003870872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987737,0.00006284612,0.00005105553,0.00055181346,0.0004536567,0.000012904961,0.0000044525077,0.000024804469,0.00006474966],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981937,0.0002374364,0.00072351034,0.00025498253,0.0002067813,0.00038358403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825513,0.00004511729,0.0010869148,0.00023057997,0.00013464814,0.00024762924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005721802,0.00020620138,0.00050177536,0.00014262505,0.0005314322,0.000038030877,0.00034801214,0.00030166263,0.0005042117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017759367,0.00019057155,0.00022644308,0.000045468507,0.00039614207,0.00024158454,0.000031125535,0.0005660637,0.00001575018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.038712006,0.023021022,0.23754862,0.000113073555,0.0026675044,0.00051018904,0.11644988,0.000014750116,0.34656546,0.0110323075,0.016522488,0.2068427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014765333,0.015047195,0.9582345,0.00016389332,0.000120163764,0.00035128108,0.004177906,0.0001713131,0.0009914773,0.000017419668,0.0055785775,0.00038097572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022576304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010193795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72068584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001333137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003873827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7771282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803408794","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.006","title":"Effortful experiences of self-control foster lay theories that self-control is limited","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Self-control; Psychology; Control (management); Ego depletion; Social psychology; Task (project management); Self; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.044102584176702236,"score_gpt":0.41925145985713613,"score_spread":0.37514887568043387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803408794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97985536,0.0018428551,0.0003143399,0.0013091984,0.0058400207,0.00034843842,0.000027792907,0.00004838948,0.010413629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928233,0.000012928698,0.00030163125,0.0051158452,0.001472347,0.000069667425,0.000001804222,0.000034207984,0.00016824724],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715936,0.00047009034,0.0011209727,0.0003207012,0.0003474119,0.0005814913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99803776,0.000083350096,0.0011067677,0.00027238898,0.0002854412,0.00021426991],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005751851,0.00027967314,0.0007105426,0.0002361109,0.00028578783,0.000028691256,0.00050494785,0.00039156625,0.00682586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001284258,0.00023452334,0.0005792241,0.00022056355,0.0005788374,0.00028191123,0.0000364294,0.00038398537,0.00012132813],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011524828,0.013358359,0.05417685,0.00003565662,0.0022037947,0.00014696093,0.698138,7.170751e-8,0.035285592,0.009862979,0.15929909,0.015967831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07165989,0.05762835,0.3306925,0.0002784508,0.001298355,0.0017172537,0.36546114,0.000022373979,0.07844579,0.004214403,0.08620791,0.0023735831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029586829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000047910166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33267686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093165734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005948535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99408203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884986557","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.005","title":"Affirmation prevents long-term weight gain","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Stanford University","keywords":"Weight gain; Psychology; Weight loss; Body mass index; Weight change; Developmental psychology; Weight control; Body weight; Term (time); Social psychology; Obesity; Endocrinology; Medicine","score_opus":0.11468137398352693,"score_gpt":0.565628252169437,"score_spread":0.45094687818591006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884986557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9610482,0.0006672226,0.0004456893,0.004388207,0.0051210336,0.0002890264,0.0000028891639,0.000018781822,0.028018987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872406,0.00012112484,0.00048187014,0.005374835,0.005976197,0.000010818628,0.000003165316,0.000017011213,0.0007743365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739766,0.0010121983,0.0008113675,0.0001360469,0.00025582066,0.00038689436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820906,0.00014756288,0.0012103503,0.00010686006,0.00018440864,0.00014176438],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010164542,0.00011650483,0.00030277448,0.00012025751,0.0010245256,0.000008193793,0.00022845408,0.00031316714,0.0060449718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000056751724,0.00010395068,0.00010335643,0.00012344221,0.00016692631,0.0004204094,0.00005742795,0.0007010417,0.0010891645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050324625,0.0046661794,0.21160342,0.00033102185,0.00041548494,0.00013301522,0.100439355,1.7061109e-7,0.13774762,0.0041146083,0.52081245,0.014704224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008290992,0.0033936522,0.8799316,0.00038097636,0.000081898754,0.0001160811,0.007097779,0.000005308402,0.0055472953,0.001659678,0.09310449,0.00039020716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000150081605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000266082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6683282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001935313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013851056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885616749","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.004","title":"Is research in social psychology politically biased? Systematic empirical tests and a forecasting survey to address the controversy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Marsden Fund; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education; Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires","keywords":"Conservatism; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Empirical research; Field (mathematics); Explanatory power; Sample (material); Response bias; Pessimism; Positive economics; Social science; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.45956460045830977,"score_gpt":0.5971191704925078,"score_spread":0.13755457003419808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885616749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9306106,0.0005226826,0.000031868785,0.036483333,0.0019980986,0.0006726306,0.000014843565,0.00001520708,0.029650714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811382,0.000023839139,0.000070197406,0.014879172,0.0036931378,0.000041565174,8.628132e-7,0.000026002794,0.00012698407],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912328,0.0054166066,0.001113442,0.00043088116,0.0007697018,0.0010365543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965869,0.0018545489,0.0004363313,0.00016993593,0.0006729017,0.0002793364],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0080418745,0.00021461443,0.00079695566,0.00040417202,0.0014080929,0.00011690055,0.00080298656,0.00048583484,0.0002838341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001883446,0.00016928201,0.00019811887,0.0010386248,0.0029088317,0.0001717082,0.00014686816,0.00081993267,0.000057671077],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006409623,0.0031764114,0.104879975,0.00019585456,0.00059873826,0.00029986782,0.42922464,7.228288e-8,0.033152882,0.031369902,0.3858854,0.004806654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006335172,0.004701499,0.8920369,0.0004549559,0.000048504622,0.00024078833,0.06577695,0.000005068133,0.00021836908,0.01478514,0.014743705,0.0006529237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011819913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016294465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78715694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002981801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017089571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W290633941","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.006","title":"Give a piece of you: Gifts that reflect givers promote closeness","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Closeness; Gift giving; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Preference; Perception","score_opus":0.1125277416284557,"score_gpt":0.4968327355029637,"score_spread":0.384304993874508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W290633941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9343767,0.0016131626,0.0007706313,0.0012187209,0.004074424,0.00021205192,0.000009414671,0.000018634275,0.057706233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750704,0.000013910536,0.000694836,0.0002726601,0.00053942343,0.0000058790606,0.000006010293,0.000028683191,0.0009315455],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981805,0.0003276666,0.0006008862,0.00021851232,0.0003613069,0.0003111326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854416,0.00004688076,0.00090179953,0.00017315017,0.00017338345,0.0001606397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000528393,0.0001934515,0.00046255105,0.00020458044,0.00010622983,0.000012105212,0.00034538138,0.00034706842,0.0003604321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022463379,0.00017242068,0.00026308544,0.00023564628,0.00034491238,0.0001682568,0.000051515093,0.00042666713,0.000053994747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016135113,0.011268657,0.23124516,0.000047598725,0.003974175,0.0010725568,0.31791005,0.0000415769,0.21031186,0.055860262,0.13584922,0.016283773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07134979,0.025472963,0.45278123,0.00028956012,0.0011216276,0.0039866194,0.23637967,0.0000879211,0.035485204,0.028203867,0.14152299,0.003318567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025153997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027319754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22153607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013014539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079552156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7031111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915152171","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2019.02.003","title":"Revisiting cultural differences in emotion perception between easterners and westerners: Chinese perceivers are accurate, but see additional non-intended emotions in negative facial expressions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Psychology; Categorization; Facial expression; Perception; Emotional expression; Face perception; Social psychology; Emotion perception; Social perception; Cognitive psychology; Facial Action Coding System; Communication; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07182499135641192,"score_gpt":0.380561172623393,"score_spread":0.3087361812669811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915152171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99752665,0.000005650855,0.00002457828,0.0007949466,0.00039813525,0.00021579136,0.00015314874,0.000010360265,0.0008707382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990386,0.00004589333,0.0000818926,0.00026715916,0.00041403814,0.0000095339265,0.00003416086,0.000010853526,0.000097894444],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983722,0.00038289334,0.00045453582,0.00030267093,0.0002563337,0.00023138363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992582,0.00013203482,0.0004121449,0.000049995164,0.000059081467,0.00008849957],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013787455,0.00018711716,0.00036441238,0.00028054861,0.00014668488,0.00006366601,0.0001389348,0.00017415207,0.0023216244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012533923,0.00015875633,0.000120327764,0.00022619872,0.00019577733,0.0008077304,0.00004166526,0.00046015406,0.000066895336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023912387,0.00019207368,0.14594528,0.000010525688,0.000009059099,0.000018423878,0.015776029,0.0000048788143,0.8352835,0.000005393534,0.00024637906,0.0022693395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020107937,0.00018352419,0.95480764,0.00019101004,0.0000050742096,0.00006302872,0.041919038,0.0000858611,0.00047100784,0.00008316834,0.00001736477,0.00016247694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027551256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010251076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83481246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017844576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021725178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916955430","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2019.02.005","title":"Does it matter if a week starts on Monday or Sunday? How calendar format can boost goal motivation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06901891063293299,"score_gpt":0.424901828994338,"score_spread":0.355882918361405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916955430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690396,0.00010766797,0.00003241204,0.01775245,0.007792198,0.0003672462,0.00015773495,0.000018734232,0.004731944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98175263,0.000008910723,0.00010177415,0.007627072,0.000780208,0.000027562734,0.000018303319,0.000040876675,0.009642651],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978423,0.0002785442,0.0007325394,0.00029117984,0.00031024005,0.00054516795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987547,0.000058465255,0.00064250914,0.00022061529,0.000110634486,0.0002131181],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027698278,0.00024865003,0.00045869662,0.00022909556,0.00020876809,0.00003608753,0.00028834477,0.00030600058,0.018529592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010953845,0.00016275562,0.00033638254,0.00014176079,0.0001500944,0.00028297803,0.0000367666,0.0005951833,0.00062464643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0070041977,0.005087441,0.031351,0.00003073655,0.00024134082,0.00017119329,0.031997975,7.868692e-7,0.02362676,0.00068377855,0.892253,0.007551838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01339578,0.018113358,0.55022043,0.00021489905,0.0000908225,0.00048553143,0.036427945,0.000003021321,0.0045307814,0.00036924004,0.37529448,0.0008537285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111473484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034817793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5188694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026724386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005834036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98236763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964441192","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103854","title":"How innuendo shapes impressions of task and intimacy groups","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Wilfrid Laurier University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Task (project management); Impression formation; Social perception; Perception","score_opus":0.030090021263314636,"score_gpt":0.3983603214320788,"score_spread":0.36827030016876416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964441192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9665964,0.0014240594,0.000041575342,0.0052452288,0.0019680627,0.00014660251,0.000004915352,0.000011085644,0.02456204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974892,0.00018339696,0.00018454775,0.0008085651,0.0009176252,0.000003615084,7.4729707e-7,0.000013980898,0.00039830094],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848807,0.00031911887,0.00041625966,0.00018775274,0.00029140204,0.00029739903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898875,0.00009917734,0.0005743166,0.00007379916,0.0001401263,0.00012383975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042052782,0.00013059459,0.00043950166,0.0001407021,0.00023080596,0.000041049232,0.00034518886,0.00025098576,0.00054100633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000083792605,0.00011707047,0.00020043508,0.00019980194,0.0007330835,0.00035376626,0.00007097931,0.00029726178,0.000010963087],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004633526,0.00065832475,0.015791578,0.000008373308,0.00017209418,0.000015149498,0.051818796,7.0902665e-8,0.874484,0.03172833,0.01464936,0.010210567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013748277,0.006205106,0.33635113,0.00017970873,0.00015441021,0.00022615715,0.27223355,0.000005363328,0.0135520585,0.036628895,0.31949267,0.0012226697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010534936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015472993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86093193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006264882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004967423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59236395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965461121","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103855","title":"Foreign language effects on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Utilitarianism; Action (physics); Social psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Deontological ethics; Moral disengagement; Moral dilemma; Dilemma; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral reasoning; Morality; Moral development; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11779810106051966,"score_gpt":0.39012583285125385,"score_spread":0.2723277317907342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965461121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937238,0.00007249819,0.0003169598,0.0007634705,0.0008545551,0.00018853751,0.000008067022,0.0000137607485,0.0040583704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898728,0.0000047471704,0.00033123055,0.009231721,0.0004397177,0.000004582483,0.0000023372581,0.000018026167,0.00009481549],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814147,0.00034879887,0.00039176954,0.00033250914,0.00045389493,0.00033157822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991604,0.00008472295,0.00038446402,0.00022812522,0.00003304597,0.00010925559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030405505,0.00019476726,0.00038551158,0.00020836532,0.00023761264,0.000036707486,0.0005142143,0.00013094438,0.00024007457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022219367,0.00013445367,0.00036546134,0.00030908122,0.00017068868,0.000258515,0.000052756975,0.00035275755,0.000044795626],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006343196,0.0008362931,0.0016109342,0.0000026822274,0.0001415302,0.00006513686,0.0015303629,0.001952193,0.9875433,0.00450096,0.0006826311,0.000499649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013945595,0.009595865,0.06400007,0.000080187594,0.00086975,0.0007032834,0.007911941,0.029529113,0.8603317,0.011202261,0.00045406862,0.0013761688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011287218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.043369e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12721162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012733758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019776167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54828614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994977059","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103941","title":"Re-assessing the incremental predictive validity of Implicit Association Tests","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Predictive validity; Incremental validity; Reliability (semiconductor); Implicit-association test; Validity; Regression analysis; Linear regression; Structural equation modeling; Test (biology); Association (psychology); Regression; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Test validity; Statistics; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Mathematics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.10073757088618243,"score_gpt":0.4637346528502633,"score_spread":0.36299708196408087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994977059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9345457,0.00029559678,0.00016393822,0.024683991,0.0019333577,0.0001993265,0.00000963646,0.000020856343,0.03814762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927958,0.000053937125,0.00010396555,0.0043602907,0.0026351872,0.000005506537,0.0000014314488,0.000013503109,0.00003034905],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722904,0.00100972,0.00066630234,0.00017986982,0.00059117936,0.0003239134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800014,0.00030615204,0.0012449143,0.00007222034,0.00024874962,0.00012781072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013173424,0.00013005268,0.00039558837,0.000050874904,0.00053703797,0.000046021323,0.0004973805,0.00026864008,0.00045728017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005227184,0.00010688547,0.00029565446,0.00034092038,0.00044695762,0.0003341443,0.00006432088,0.0004287173,0.000011729915],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068188144,0.0012138736,0.15182942,0.00000824389,0.00054383767,0.00002276652,0.213817,0.0000013163533,0.47745144,0.0037392634,0.14746006,0.003230907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048920135,0.004300196,0.6004355,0.000046442194,0.00021087677,0.00001754804,0.3137186,0.00001093182,0.020078829,0.0059926296,0.049761984,0.000534473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019187185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003596034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4573726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039415387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000115236995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5006897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011841831","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103973","title":"“To the moon, Alice”: Cavalier humor beliefs and women's reactions to aggressive and belittling sexist jokes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Joke; Psychology; Knight; Offensive; Amusement; Social psychology; Dominance (genetics); Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05136688931661991,"score_gpt":0.408457573436084,"score_spread":0.3570906841194641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011841831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9247511,0.0021217573,0.000108351676,0.06491637,0.0005880068,0.0002956223,0.000023313693,0.0000156231,0.007179865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819489,0.00007289732,0.0003375934,0.015701476,0.0015840273,0.00010116338,8.760158e-7,0.000022800174,0.00023027597],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874276,0.00011483202,0.0004194313,0.00027416713,0.00014150047,0.00030729896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991207,0.00007243268,0.00032709478,0.0001227953,0.000056614008,0.0003003317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020981378,0.00015552007,0.00030813078,0.000060883343,0.0005866421,0.00003997946,0.00019839434,0.000080671794,0.00034619632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005145735,0.00012173041,0.00006804723,0.00021699874,0.00018314537,0.00003423155,0.00011294806,0.00028698624,0.000063017294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083066366,0.0006139256,0.0012496834,0.000010817545,0.0006814085,0.000095920615,0.5930278,0.000005009574,0.15274629,0.0144906845,0.22707076,0.009177054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016845224,0.0016325846,0.04244775,0.000019607134,0.00004514237,0.0003002238,0.1316619,0.0000012487112,0.0006345266,0.00036564568,0.82090497,0.00030189098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003799105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062786057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59383416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058830137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001266543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4964022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095810629","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060","title":"A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis; University of California, Irvine; Universidad del Rosario; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; University of Pennsylvania; Loughborough University; Universiteit Gent; American University of Sharjah; University of Birmingham; University of the Punjab; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Southampton; Universidad de La Laguna; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Slovenská Akadémia Vied; De La Salle University; Zhejiang University; Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan; Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Athlone Institute of Technology; University of Queensland; Trinity Western University; Aarhus Universitet; KU Leuven; Singapore Management University; Indiana University Southeast; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; University of Alberta; Universität zu Köln; Boston College","keywords":"Religiosity; Morality; Psychology; Social psychology; Replication (statistics); False positive paradox; Replicate; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1745882555843457,"score_gpt":0.49423872904555677,"score_spread":0.31965047346121106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095810629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98753965,0.0005171784,0.00032272664,0.0049506496,0.00032076254,0.00018292123,0.000010732096,0.00001908026,0.006136298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99521947,0.000007823759,0.00077304465,0.0028783607,0.00092635263,0.000030108391,0.0000045448596,0.00001127857,0.0001490046],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987333,0.00016156997,0.00039299318,0.00035007,0.0001384718,0.00022361822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931645,0.0000145026925,0.00029015963,0.00012166187,0.00006669122,0.00019054476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001534393,0.00015159746,0.00033498523,0.00002135505,0.00019144018,0.00004796051,0.00019198468,0.00015667768,0.00022774134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022737824,0.0001177878,0.00012080639,0.00021498639,0.0001517944,0.00009964445,0.000056317098,0.0002409459,0.000011841009],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044307015,0.0017056189,0.06307662,0.000020524767,0.0007906149,0.000031102263,0.52329475,0.000004221537,0.17212097,0.019011965,0.17668575,0.038827166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017162259,0.0012175991,0.9249055,0.0000072041407,0.00003067634,0.0002132361,0.05969872,0.0000014898199,0.0023455233,0.00060108776,0.008999569,0.00026320468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000039271898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.4927915e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86182886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004222801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000060556717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48032472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100848500","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104083","title":"Recognizing the Impact of COVID-19 on the Poor Alters Attitudes Towards Poverty and Inequality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Attribution; Inequality; Psychology; Economic interventionism; Opposition (politics); Recession; Economic inequality; Government (linguistics); Social psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Demographic economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.17024120506555385,"score_gpt":0.4771280719428196,"score_spread":0.30688686687726574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100848500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432765,0.00064245594,0.00017532684,0.04257999,0.0008363635,0.00019046178,0.000020451367,0.000016676662,0.012261728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9709655,0.000044174143,0.000035330355,0.028261255,0.00065342017,0.0000071068803,0.000001556272,0.000014846427,0.000016816397],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99762744,0.0010230383,0.0005901317,0.00025531196,0.00024563164,0.0002584351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985474,0.00038791096,0.00064860174,0.00015613598,0.000049494873,0.00021047637],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096475496,0.00019244628,0.0004009054,0.000052514093,0.00024932311,0.00002596801,0.00033929857,0.0001839509,0.0016800617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030892843,0.00009979381,0.00033765245,0.00020040681,0.00037726268,0.000067049245,0.000048635793,0.00058491045,0.000021900772],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014966522,0.0026422034,0.06310962,0.000031250656,0.0024139222,0.00013636806,0.0834753,0.000029630575,0.20994872,0.011204625,0.5865854,0.025456402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058032353,0.008944067,0.9514483,0.000029451347,0.00008834389,0.00035660644,0.016564691,0.00001223244,0.0022194816,0.0042755827,0.009825934,0.00043206455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030046402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001961023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8883387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108252025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049948278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134500005","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104116","title":"Poverty and pain: Low-SES people are believed to be insensitive to pain","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Poverty; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02994447603823135,"score_gpt":0.36408145697582295,"score_spread":0.3341369809375916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134500005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95068866,0.0010018292,0.0008613419,0.038911846,0.0020071694,0.00021364413,0.00002430465,0.000021087342,0.0062701358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8812521,0.000029643483,0.00047802765,0.116675876,0.0009611842,0.000011649674,0.000005658255,0.000029308236,0.00055655953],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972206,0.0011815652,0.00051853433,0.00036347072,0.00028961594,0.00042621783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874073,0.00022613771,0.00027913167,0.00015301499,0.00023593268,0.00036506116],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011450088,0.00021759154,0.00056365493,0.000112705915,0.00032979393,0.00003930288,0.00017175922,0.00029885705,0.0009290333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037549317,0.00021986532,0.00022539185,0.0003685853,0.00008038918,0.00008781262,0.00013450718,0.000342855,0.000054031574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029931678,0.002498658,0.0061608925,0.000016281305,0.00041588803,0.0012289872,0.15437025,0.0000016262507,0.2166907,0.0024144824,0.58538944,0.027819654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008095614,0.005982693,0.42849234,0.00016907942,0.00009591175,0.00090568885,0.24619414,0.0000045362412,0.010695108,0.0016137108,0.2964356,0.0013155896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006696436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001285432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42233145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012371432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005916728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134602075","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104121","title":"Social pain and the role of imagined social consequences: Why personal adverse experiences elicit social pain, with or without explicit relational devaluation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Devaluation; Psychology; Belongingness; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.042270317675369734,"score_gpt":0.377007740196165,"score_spread":0.3347374225207953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134602075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97725725,0.001720595,0.0012150857,0.011186415,0.00067876955,0.00040624762,0.000020604324,0.00002727882,0.0074877813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925594,0.000020172532,0.0003671506,0.0046540378,0.0020734484,0.00008603761,0.000019458303,0.000034979385,0.00018535242],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944264,0.0029130569,0.00093547476,0.00040622475,0.00086082297,0.00045800154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977498,0.00040586517,0.0011331259,0.000085164684,0.00052477495,0.000101247024],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027762756,0.00032065163,0.0008218808,0.000110421024,0.0014466586,0.00004478631,0.00028367725,0.00043168227,0.0020111578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001918247,0.0002362376,0.00040774918,0.0004052434,0.0022335108,0.00027810296,0.00007518079,0.00055736076,0.0000062306613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019463211,0.0014112195,0.006886627,0.000021599373,0.0009397166,0.00012823308,0.84938765,5.809622e-7,0.037068017,0.05148828,0.015474911,0.017729962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.019855006,0.001855944,0.018056173,0.000048625687,0.00029091685,0.0004846216,0.93555903,0.00012296581,0.0013077523,0.009202023,0.01250736,0.0007095764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000110131725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004260094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08617139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015095156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038972334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139719779","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104143","title":"Cultural differences in perceiving transitions in emotional facial expressions: Easterners show greater contrast effects than westerners","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Facial expression; Anger; Perception; Emotional expression; Social psychology; Emotional valence; Social perception; Contrast (vision); Context (archaeology); Developmental psychology; Cognition; Communication","score_opus":0.10067523896946202,"score_gpt":0.4156785369654447,"score_spread":0.3150032979959827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139719779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942932,0.00070108956,0.000027804264,0.0014259911,0.001897978,0.00013592736,0.000013537915,0.000010280619,0.0014941661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99852705,0.000020964688,0.00007200035,0.00046949938,0.0005129235,0.000023519258,0.00001132987,0.000014344707,0.0003483875],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978174,0.0005629858,0.0006285682,0.0003246415,0.00025744474,0.00040896155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994566,0.00006161762,0.00021488182,0.000086913016,0.00006840063,0.00011160317],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013571672,0.00024165942,0.0005487245,0.00016603965,0.00011294875,0.00006273429,0.00022384485,0.00024882908,0.0013761019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000218506,0.00018809075,0.00027454112,0.00020071259,0.00021279814,0.0002534023,0.000033288943,0.00047649434,0.000019887479],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00069940253,0.0015547485,0.542867,0.000014385309,0.000173982,0.0008518455,0.14500941,0.0000018506948,0.30515012,0.000667996,0.0009017641,0.002107456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034703808,0.0002946998,0.9507028,0.00015719145,0.000016025828,0.00019585156,0.043929473,0.0000042678967,0.0008163123,0.00016902995,0.000037695238,0.00020629347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009860167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015560187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40783575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000111965324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003207099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W315812521","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.011","title":"Creation in judgments about the establishment of ownership","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Object (grammar); Social psychology; Psychology; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.22242603654721704,"score_gpt":0.4055484458716488,"score_spread":0.18312240932443175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W315812521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97648615,0.0003448985,0.000031615815,0.0061937114,0.0014076489,0.00011745594,0.0000027431342,0.0000042512097,0.015411518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99676967,0.000028979452,0.00009346098,0.002725009,0.00026035853,0.000005681808,7.248751e-7,0.000007259234,0.00010884077],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.998383,0.00030890352,0.0005351578,0.00015812722,0.00041341138,0.00020140449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992398,0.0000652116,0.00046234674,0.000095730764,0.000056394114,0.000080529244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006312019,0.00010400658,0.00023057921,0.000125162,0.00006472811,0.000012659398,0.0003592126,0.00009231318,0.00009054199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000106813044,0.00007045149,0.000105709514,0.00021015582,0.0003254962,0.00017220224,0.000042116746,0.00023303102,0.000016106233],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018241339,0.0028083143,0.008007487,0.000004725365,0.00003169019,0.000073750016,0.00846051,0.000036111094,0.9384377,0.0060892203,0.030378101,0.0038482284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016920626,0.004682456,0.32247865,0.00011415178,0.000045391895,0.0006468845,0.01096039,0.0000280085,0.59774107,0.02179858,0.024059506,0.00052431045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017334896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020193852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3406967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013003034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041376006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28729284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163923658","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104162","title":"Assessing implicit attitudes about androgyny","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Washington; Princeton University","keywords":"Psychology; Androgyny; Social psychology; Implicit-association test; Implicit attitude; Perception; Incremental validity; Expression (computer science); Social perception; Predictive validity; Developmental psychology; Test validity; Psychometrics; Masculinity","score_opus":0.0848179238695355,"score_gpt":0.5060859383396841,"score_spread":0.42126801447014856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163923658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8423368,0.003200689,0.00019590853,0.0053423992,0.0045461017,0.000065203654,0.0000017920371,0.000026635626,0.14428449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917934,0.00019831295,0.00057506777,0.003781716,0.0031867335,0.0000041058393,0.0000017434994,0.000019050762,0.00043988234],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778056,0.0005851288,0.00057149684,0.00024137681,0.00037184465,0.0004496131],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888295,0.00009643574,0.00044271926,0.000108357686,0.00030179758,0.00016771247],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065171113,0.00014594615,0.0004343431,0.0000940209,0.0006994019,0.0001573069,0.0003558793,0.00031818554,0.0019046422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013752766,0.00014854055,0.00033505284,0.0003267525,0.000596277,0.0005106519,0.000054324366,0.0003846271,0.000042322226],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022744067,0.0022653472,0.02111534,0.000007563829,0.0003942871,0.0005654641,0.042867083,2.8902477e-7,0.7905824,0.051868513,0.06310433,0.027001923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046498273,0.0008320308,0.45274046,0.00008120918,0.00008800328,0.0006210465,0.09552177,5.110516e-7,0.017269807,0.011786036,0.4156514,0.00075790915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000090423564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006195427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7733126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020155295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022189465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99900776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172656630","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104169","title":"No laughing matter: Why humor mistakes are more damaging for men than women","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04385843310688879,"score_gpt":0.4142461660958324,"score_spread":0.3703877329889436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172656630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85283357,0.0024584054,0.00045204116,0.016670654,0.0022077605,0.00030154013,0.000069341586,0.000030060874,0.12497665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883881,0.000013549633,0.00085492316,0.005439507,0.0017756503,0.00014065723,0.000009668014,0.000045951158,0.0033319981],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984165,0.0001119798,0.00053980266,0.00029773402,0.00016094145,0.00047305174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892086,0.00007381402,0.0005239294,0.00020341353,0.0001574226,0.00012055576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023831226,0.0001875072,0.00046361214,0.00007083375,0.00041089967,0.00004575387,0.00028696746,0.00011685862,0.0028024276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020426616,0.00018445447,0.0002534548,0.00013959888,0.0001594778,0.00006048081,0.00004701377,0.000258129,0.0001075577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064378994,0.0017903843,0.008553443,0.000026362817,0.0008619129,0.0001876495,0.07849809,7.12682e-7,0.16554154,0.0050482336,0.737916,0.0009319082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005321269,0.0005050834,0.063671835,0.00004314891,0.00006888604,0.00047428903,0.35827664,0.0000029343396,0.0034081833,0.0010783051,0.56664497,0.0005044748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016100288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000031695765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27977854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015084851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025900868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99810916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186295407","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104154","title":"Retrospective and prospective hindsight bias: Replications and extensions of Fischhoff (1975) and Slovic and Fischhoff (1977)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Psychology; Replication (statistics); Debiasing; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14643696357332456,"score_gpt":0.4601383078492517,"score_spread":0.3137013442759271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186295407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916225,0.0035026635,0.000070753435,0.0026265257,0.00037087625,0.00011739066,0.000026629674,0.0000055619107,0.0016570713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974149,0.0003016428,0.0016391056,0.0003273872,0.00013169833,0.000004096581,9.061725e-7,0.000012082218,0.00016818153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794376,0.00018658311,0.0008437014,0.00051782216,0.00033595337,0.00017219257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806374,0.0003766252,0.0007469482,0.00023828025,0.00041103864,0.00016335442],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009178608,0.00016152274,0.0006057155,0.00021690244,0.000308418,0.00014005108,0.0001596437,0.00016548535,0.00011813401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007687169,0.00012976878,0.0000981965,0.00029468,0.0006190771,0.000336407,0.00021183383,0.0002835046,0.0000028388981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001052555,0.0018651125,0.4523046,0.000010357808,0.00030331354,0.00026697505,0.021473218,0.0000011678602,0.35494632,0.008682917,0.027415147,0.13167833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020490566,0.0008714893,0.9078916,0.0000383647,0.00006050507,0.0013111167,0.0081103025,0.000019271394,0.004857184,0.070709504,0.003848779,0.00023282287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011367294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015575055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.455587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045876026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058107253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5291818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203886424","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104227","title":"Hate and meaning in life: How collective, but not personal, hate quells threat and spurs meaning in life","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Feeling; Social psychology; Psychology; Prosocial behavior; Hatred; Ideology; Enthusiasm; Politics; Law; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.11762158646030198,"score_gpt":0.3475678058141084,"score_spread":0.22994621935380644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203886424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98060477,0.0013634659,0.000013521402,0.013062816,0.0007608893,0.00011502207,0.0000072068237,0.000007729561,0.004064601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99252605,0.00041898165,0.0002396326,0.0063199378,0.00023931815,0.000006071696,7.9183275e-7,0.000018026805,0.00023118008],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805593,0.00040825148,0.00042923162,0.00044264836,0.00029547044,0.00036847303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992796,0.00013612902,0.00027899886,0.00006399097,0.000045519195,0.00019572386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036928596,0.00020411356,0.00048043212,0.00021624072,0.0002095638,0.00007019377,0.00014794822,0.00017578142,0.000085847314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020925855,0.00020030624,0.000092294424,0.00028054832,0.00036351508,0.0002946666,0.00009426216,0.000503308,0.0000042929646],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008883577,0.00053426286,0.010377972,0.000009138961,0.000034185105,0.0007787984,0.007937904,0.0000034380685,0.97597915,0.0012044836,0.0016782839,0.000574055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02985055,0.0032051827,0.4948497,0.00048510553,0.000079192614,0.005147488,0.041556496,0.00028029157,0.4071267,0.013794715,0.0020899558,0.0015346046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002176868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027732822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5688524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001530535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010876114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8168251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W325661287","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.005","title":"The “more is less” effect in equifinal structures: Alternative means reduce the intensity and quality of motivation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Context (archaeology); Equifinality; Social psychology; Set (abstract data type); Quality (philosophy); Association (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2919901744456615,"score_gpt":0.5482748928171859,"score_spread":0.2562847183715244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W325661287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918804,0.0013666,0.000042426516,0.0035452102,0.0018016206,0.00018684527,0.000007714443,0.000002971894,0.0011662234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988694,0.000015809675,0.000030978088,0.0007384738,0.00027041225,0.000009308781,0.0000012941787,0.000008094865,0.00005623644],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796236,0.00078308326,0.00068603124,0.00014081903,0.0002211965,0.00020654393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987845,0.00016843887,0.00066248194,0.0001338906,0.00017243749,0.0000782576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014101798,0.0001128544,0.00031215523,0.00006573379,0.00015124217,0.000013555376,0.00025050042,0.00012605687,0.000058663958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010067526,0.000067235196,0.00014141107,0.00012567977,0.0005371049,0.00008449744,0.00004659418,0.00044408106,0.0000021130709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03387924,0.0038528813,0.29211202,0.000041526597,0.0007554693,0.00007200752,0.31588528,0.0000029247396,0.08087485,0.054612994,0.09193503,0.12597579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003802472,0.0023372888,0.9467993,0.00003086644,0.000022762248,0.000077661374,0.036629442,0.00000250341,0.0051204083,0.004438052,0.00063076953,0.0001085035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006608162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036856225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6546872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103102066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031489853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27417716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220793672","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104328","title":"Dealbreakers, or dealbenders? Capturing the cumulative effects of partner information on mate choice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Adventure; Contrast (vision); Selection (genetic algorithm); Replication (statistics); Statistics","score_opus":0.05428000707463025,"score_gpt":0.41325539133343486,"score_spread":0.3589753842588046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220793672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732655,0.0005613653,0.000058149828,0.001516842,0.0042071426,0.0003663937,0.000017791313,0.000017695305,0.019989096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960806,0.00000492454,0.000046481764,0.0028020844,0.00036831692,0.00007666566,0.0000087206145,0.000018668172,0.00059358886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772865,0.0007060252,0.00072106696,0.00016894347,0.00035985967,0.0003154673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834216,0.0003409378,0.0009747738,0.00020823591,0.000070490794,0.00006341501],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004691799,0.00018658463,0.00034712837,0.00021638606,0.0005902901,0.000010752323,0.00043855657,0.00014508994,0.003903278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026675358,0.00013813043,0.00022544342,0.00020251106,0.0003113409,0.00021230557,0.00007755626,0.0007133227,0.000052648422],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031812746,0.0129506895,0.023567276,0.000091735186,0.002869354,0.00082461286,0.2861538,0.00035939694,0.044571783,0.14770396,0.4353156,0.013779055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015796192,0.010437323,0.85244143,0.00004219031,0.0002653693,0.00182468,0.037684582,0.000006996703,0.003227856,0.0022156239,0.075424954,0.0006328233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000053571173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003890602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8288741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016758115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003822163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224116516","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104340","title":"Concealment stigma: The social costs of concealing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology; Outgroup; Stigma (botany); Social identity theory; Identity (music); Social discrimination; Social rejection; Social distance; Social group; Social relation; Social issues; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)","score_opus":0.0697461458117795,"score_gpt":0.46359291095028843,"score_spread":0.3938467651385089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224116516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93297064,0.0017421206,0.000067079585,0.01468335,0.005711022,0.00026254813,0.000019690247,0.000017123813,0.044526447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945296,0.000044227247,0.00004014083,0.003175491,0.0019827157,0.000023065564,0.0000019276913,0.00001587295,0.00018695176],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966104,0.0013834592,0.00072673854,0.00017596046,0.00071336044,0.0003900551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998501,0.00017221051,0.0009917642,0.000087824075,0.00016620946,0.00008098392],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001586892,0.00013544007,0.0004274268,0.0000907303,0.0023237735,0.000021647442,0.0007948513,0.00013489187,0.0019130015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058299884,0.000117216245,0.00036332215,0.0003599066,0.0014379198,0.00011100486,0.00013129415,0.00056435954,0.0000056425133],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017057562,0.0020260327,0.0027896508,0.0000045572547,0.0005242427,0.000069654976,0.4046962,0.0000056032045,0.1255967,0.26185942,0.18773018,0.012992022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049351063,0.002279459,0.012662554,0.00001352859,0.00008708343,0.00009208133,0.59758574,0.0000022836696,0.0019389663,0.005841228,0.37413827,0.00042371757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048992626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030940595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2560182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005112255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018102524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99899936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224290336","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104338","title":"Corrigendum to “Does helping promote well-being in at-risk youth and ex-offender samples?” [Volume 82, Pages 307–317]","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Volume (thermodynamics); Social psychology; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.05754038188581601,"score_gpt":0.4024989894860519,"score_spread":0.3449586076002359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224290336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7897845,0.009454177,0.000035174995,0.0016520566,0.123023555,0.0011699478,0.00018050958,0.000044002725,0.07465608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87337255,0.002720754,0.0003556876,0.0055417484,0.0075740535,0.00013211083,0.00019423514,0.00027810695,0.10983072],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99435276,0.0010879796,0.0016092722,0.0010095924,0.00073642,0.0012039684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99740237,0.00005505461,0.0016093265,0.00040608676,0.000065085405,0.00046207407],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011525095,0.0006545588,0.0014116117,0.00075888616,0.0006730742,0.00006318779,0.00076575024,0.0008812218,0.0056159277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004324718,0.0005974001,0.00039387096,0.00043741666,0.00031655523,0.00018797147,0.00045229204,0.0027225756,0.00012293107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019051856,0.0012754586,0.015053364,0.000067044515,0.00030147823,0.00068076793,0.12263904,6.4369397e-7,0.0031529386,0.00012531494,0.8456944,0.009104346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059241285,0.0055891927,0.110215805,0.000363871,0.00019448402,0.0013890113,0.11178401,0.0000027953763,0.00043542925,0.0008486649,0.7617639,0.001488754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067871273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018812645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115449496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001199101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019139402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313201472","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104437","title":"Desired attitudes guide actual attitude change","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attitude change; Psychology; Attitude; Social psychology; Construct (python library); Value (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Object (grammar); Work (physics); Positive attitude; Computer science","score_opus":0.1597606748368514,"score_gpt":0.48042118509098825,"score_spread":0.32066051025413683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313201472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8981933,0.0024647007,0.00005943888,0.011883237,0.009574606,0.0003375783,0.000013520064,0.000060400394,0.077413216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98761463,0.00009325563,0.0002611107,0.0071226154,0.0039744256,0.00005873806,0.000003067071,0.000025449564,0.0008467124],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970598,0.0009148725,0.0006097433,0.00024727406,0.0006553859,0.0005128768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989613,0.00008733868,0.0005494168,0.000115595896,0.000117513926,0.00016880702],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011606751,0.00016767507,0.00041351168,0.00018647229,0.0015587133,0.000038473627,0.0008004642,0.00016814683,0.005321761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007159082,0.00017765474,0.0003489886,0.00035280452,0.00060919893,0.0002948588,0.00015754455,0.0005147824,0.00004105229],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018962367,0.005625693,0.018671038,0.0000070103615,0.0006708292,0.00045716608,0.27969933,0.0000012210497,0.16288275,0.05035965,0.45092702,0.028802095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024940136,0.0018566224,0.058561243,0.0000072205585,0.000035789457,0.00014333415,0.045436434,3.6691173e-7,0.0005259153,0.0018052818,0.8887518,0.0003819835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045890093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007747861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4378248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054515403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012570596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319067641","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104457","title":"When more is less: Self-control strategies are seen as less indicative of self-control than just willpower","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Self-control; Control (management); Social psychology; Perception; Perceived control; Ego depletion; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07386936847370958,"score_gpt":0.45442184443188804,"score_spread":0.3805524759581785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319067641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98252547,0.0014628049,0.00007248099,0.0060749226,0.0024042774,0.00047105105,0.00016825834,0.00009782377,0.0067228875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959639,0.000037718328,0.00010611436,0.0025987544,0.0007542691,0.00007562632,0.0000105494355,0.0000546486,0.0003984778],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967296,0.00053288846,0.0012492426,0.0003909855,0.0004313093,0.00066598936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965897,0.00008871807,0.002506968,0.0002875516,0.00026339557,0.0002636645],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054682355,0.0003298706,0.0008880043,0.00041481503,0.00026436042,0.00003740231,0.00060262147,0.0005203431,0.001808945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017815431,0.00030540046,0.0006348984,0.00036975666,0.0003331874,0.00032607958,0.00004861501,0.00073050446,0.00023001476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007454258,0.015847495,0.17553614,0.00013209414,0.005117153,0.0008991172,0.319599,0.000003947847,0.024632005,0.012738757,0.42973053,0.008309495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014064958,0.0039732354,0.7302859,0.00011318993,0.00036054646,0.0002272056,0.24195829,0.0000051032403,0.0009542577,0.0015986377,0.005943692,0.0005149798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002655981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002349012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5547498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016529021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016117553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362716327","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104473","title":"The mind's “aye”? Investigating overlap in findings produced by reverse correlation versus self-report","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Correlation; Psychology; Social psychology; Negative correlation; Positive correlation; Perception; Measure (data warehouse); Social desirability; Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.05928821463180299,"score_gpt":0.43475636929001893,"score_spread":0.3754681546582159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362716327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97043383,0.00023898708,0.000004119903,0.010700521,0.0070800944,0.00019757253,0.0000016451083,0.00003534107,0.011307888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974435,0.00011081248,0.000082003,0.0005215973,0.0012658915,0.000015510386,0.0000045384313,0.000017627957,0.00053849374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997644,0.0004967974,0.00069593586,0.00024164631,0.00045417238,0.00046742405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988249,0.0003057929,0.000547943,0.000102727,0.000107637476,0.00011101381],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019903164,0.00013640427,0.0002639903,0.00012896275,0.00083453214,0.00005866577,0.0003707088,0.0002779319,0.000087567976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000681126,0.000119368546,0.00016234277,0.0007220953,0.0005101385,0.0002777797,0.00004482385,0.00045812473,0.000070389906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011279192,0.0007500961,0.04664577,0.0000042804877,0.00027236773,0.00025235236,0.16371927,0.0000019311196,0.30703422,0.0066295704,0.46878082,0.004781401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0109715955,0.0019907826,0.11677842,0.0000751807,0.00008463674,0.00012387245,0.22366178,0.000022435343,0.0046975603,0.0051966454,0.63547415,0.0009229588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024824607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009798625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3023367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036533966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013161777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6418631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384435981","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104506","title":"Why do people turn to smartphones during social interactions?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Impact of Technology on Adolescents","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Recreation; Social relation; Social psychology; Phone; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.039417867685415116,"score_gpt":0.43353834193171925,"score_spread":0.39412047424630414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384435981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9547337,0.00007830697,0.000029000023,0.035636608,0.0037705621,0.00015611824,0.000005118035,0.00012902886,0.005461502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947202,0.000025490368,0.00010866372,0.0025653278,0.0019789587,0.000009286276,0.0000011488557,0.000026384963,0.00056453084],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980143,0.00025961705,0.00047364918,0.0002073633,0.0004719263,0.0005731765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999185,0.00004236521,0.00037177422,0.00009628207,0.00012827232,0.00017627698],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005371186,0.00015964649,0.00036534455,0.00044097594,0.0013175567,0.00009234394,0.00053607835,0.00024719132,0.0006808719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015398089,0.00016971825,0.00025584848,0.0009302672,0.0002939937,0.0003207048,0.00012211861,0.00046087586,0.00026732957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008163297,0.00086156157,0.013751985,0.0000084781495,0.0001897916,0.00013695135,0.11336844,0.0000013183613,0.24331687,0.0011704789,0.6210228,0.005354952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048571397,0.0007065924,0.6041031,0.00007673178,0.000054979217,0.00020018328,0.1699228,0.0000011876594,0.017378472,0.0026974238,0.19917454,0.0008268697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020846276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026011592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5903511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037836045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006612017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385678995","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104520","title":"Women exaggerate, men downplay: Gendered endorsement of emotional dramatization stereotypes contributes to gender bias in pain expectations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities","keywords":"Exaggeration; Psychology; Social psychology; Dramatization; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.08836965893653523,"score_gpt":0.40428591296775496,"score_spread":0.3159162540312197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385678995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.993952,0.00024878292,0.0005452234,0.0034914464,0.00051495025,0.00028686307,0.0000071022164,0.0000121003995,0.00094155746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978735,0.000022636592,0.00036406034,0.0012526023,0.00028610387,0.000047405978,0.00003783614,0.000012090935,0.000103777624],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983964,0.00025323426,0.000676882,0.00013469892,0.00030419833,0.0002345729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992221,0.00012774854,0.00027843824,0.00007012029,0.00016177999,0.00013978912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091648346,0.00010239107,0.00034837506,0.0004379742,0.00007202867,0.0000109058565,0.00007808541,0.00011168256,0.00038457997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035941417,0.00009264743,0.00008353156,0.0005301204,0.000081831524,0.00007574533,0.000019310246,0.0001551615,0.000017503862],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016963424,0.0032732934,0.015439091,0.00007852908,0.00046468352,0.000067108755,0.46432072,0.000035223504,0.45245636,0.0014262224,0.053645413,0.0070970245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00900662,0.00204569,0.47428563,0.00016434476,0.00004562793,0.000056444038,0.4795525,0.000096802585,0.03040758,0.0025281443,0.0015924503,0.00021813782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008507131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000017510704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45884654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002919222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018486174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4210881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386552649","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104539","title":"Do reminders of God increase willingness to take risks?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Social psychology; Test (biology); Recreation; Law","score_opus":0.1273355833860818,"score_gpt":0.4918050016996563,"score_spread":0.3644694183135745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386552649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953657,0.0006579563,0.00006556896,0.008293404,0.0031497485,0.00017627259,0.0000086702,0.000030108175,0.033961277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959136,0.00018209727,0.00019744746,0.0019417547,0.0015663931,0.0000069634507,0.0000022517609,0.000020612088,0.00016888228],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739856,0.00059054076,0.00075511116,0.00025415828,0.0005385069,0.00046310682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986326,0.00015523068,0.00055785914,0.0001673078,0.00020589773,0.0002810888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019100637,0.0001551126,0.0004854043,0.00026315846,0.00036737882,0.000031084888,0.00055409153,0.00032270816,0.00046783424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022267863,0.00015442458,0.0002880735,0.0008355637,0.00060902594,0.0001400994,0.000051229246,0.00027831405,0.00009226419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001745277,0.0018027197,0.062873624,0.000022616947,0.00039512306,0.00025138826,0.23975852,0.000014387878,0.11371615,0.022221295,0.545929,0.011269872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071908645,0.0028211281,0.4687057,0.00012326935,0.00012187403,0.00012699368,0.21798122,0.0000015628226,0.00696715,0.023109004,0.27179992,0.001051302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001557638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012544006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40583208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011063392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001233858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62972516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387213251","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104544","title":"Time perspective and helpfulness: Are communicators more persuasive in the past, present, or future tense?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Helpfulness; Psychology; Future tense; Present tense; Persuasion; Perspective (graphical); Past tense; Construal level theory; Psycholinguistics; Social psychology; Linguistics; Cognition; Verb","score_opus":0.09660583453216816,"score_gpt":0.4751921835258672,"score_spread":0.37858634899369903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387213251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90991545,0.0034663717,0.0000018341382,0.06400296,0.00068725646,0.00038400976,0.000021736352,0.00003407716,0.021486314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994762,0.00014087633,0.000025182422,0.001769382,0.0023113054,0.000057027995,0.0000039474944,0.000029447696,0.00090084015],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969928,0.0011345943,0.00049104437,0.00040207306,0.0004289395,0.0005505258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986571,0.00034242947,0.00037723963,0.00032802366,0.0001601472,0.00013507738],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008045469,0.00025783447,0.00053387973,0.0003630626,0.0003163748,0.000047752543,0.00087101344,0.00031874998,0.0011951653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005129543,0.0001560475,0.0002266696,0.0009779319,0.001076975,0.00014474931,0.00017580904,0.0011268347,0.00016165001],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010500951,0.0054075704,0.016414465,0.000016324699,0.00085375196,0.005174159,0.31053558,0.0000011944767,0.009348309,0.008665362,0.62905353,0.004028825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032744217,0.0014210779,0.39075658,0.000016704858,0.000017319024,0.00069222297,0.585027,0.0000030972858,0.0000320926,0.0021269093,0.016404778,0.00022781009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056099776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000059640324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6126487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014019874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027683594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387762951","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104550","title":"This will not change us: Leader's use of continuity rhetoric to promote collective change","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Generalizability theory; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Psychology; Identity change; Collective identity; Perception; Identity (music); Public relations; Social group; Political science; Politics; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.17298501671075903,"score_gpt":0.4237323608211828,"score_spread":0.25074734411042376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387762951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9885711,0.00033079274,0.000022079692,0.0028402216,0.0046673617,0.00058475044,0.00008941579,0.000035885936,0.0028583705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929507,0.000054825563,0.00020032158,0.0031573947,0.0017243321,0.00010246618,0.0000062453782,0.00004448481,0.001759224],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802864,0.0001997812,0.0006491547,0.00030025726,0.0003195178,0.000502659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874145,0.00006662138,0.00063663,0.00020927492,0.00018796968,0.00015807453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004563179,0.00022869573,0.00060872565,0.0004237303,0.00015617565,0.000022078635,0.00034212493,0.00029694795,0.00094078464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003261876,0.00021996455,0.00025914542,0.00082385866,0.00016868634,0.00034540714,0.0000939082,0.00039726516,0.00018894156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074805017,0.0036585534,0.041037746,0.000049172017,0.0011946779,0.00044524335,0.45458484,0.0000011954442,0.22439758,0.0038086066,0.2286672,0.034674678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054463376,0.0062688226,0.79049987,0.00009909348,0.00007884458,0.00024055081,0.003780711,0.000036689864,0.0049903137,0.00020706537,0.18766078,0.0006909313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018937842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025734209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7494621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021375215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035595698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389004673","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104567","title":"Harnessing dehumanization theory, modern media, and an intervention tournament to reduce support for retributive war crimes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Sheridan College","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Tournament; Retributive justice; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychological intervention; Law; Political science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.08024268852553908,"score_gpt":0.4770215025354717,"score_spread":0.39677881400993265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389004673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826023,0.0003619788,0.005811047,0.0041612755,0.0038152772,0.00034462445,0.000013831592,0.000051523475,0.002838115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608123,0.00006973765,0.00043440153,0.00096773263,0.0021175959,0.000022574672,0.000015887163,0.000023247941,0.00026756118],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813515,0.0004963669,0.0004948097,0.0002443872,0.00026670846,0.00036259752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900454,0.00012359099,0.00036377314,0.00006883994,0.00025167243,0.00018757711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017120381,0.00012880171,0.00029888342,0.00022652412,0.00064964325,0.00006001931,0.00026101488,0.00020539894,0.00023169615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003026276,0.0001290641,0.00015941051,0.0002986485,0.00029878464,0.00037987198,0.000047943286,0.00016147438,0.00001295123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027346362,0.0012403247,0.001022855,0.000012709754,0.0002503688,0.000035997768,0.529165,0.0000020704376,0.21814606,0.05440804,0.050848197,0.14213373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010196711,0.009660314,0.094961725,0.0001654784,0.00021496914,0.00008720513,0.45670366,0.00004626441,0.023686964,0.35652876,0.0465619,0.0011860506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047539506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045106608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30212072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020832554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051584022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5263081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392438439","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104600","title":"(Not) showing you feel good, can be bad: The consequences of breaking expressivity norms for positive emotions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Gratitude; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Perception; Ostracism; Norm (philosophy)","score_opus":0.1368134424627259,"score_gpt":0.4565876971121284,"score_spread":0.31977425464940246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392438439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9775034,0.0017481463,0.00028720262,0.011205603,0.0033193287,0.00024743308,0.00015015123,0.000017532162,0.005521162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739254,0.00001789549,0.00014683514,0.00097089633,0.00090210367,0.000022843507,0.000007336383,0.00001759182,0.00052196527],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985146,0.0001984075,0.000545278,0.00023533308,0.00021772276,0.00028865272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990643,0.00028473896,0.00035504816,0.00011274001,0.00011865716,0.00006449517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038945762,0.00017468099,0.0003713139,0.0000841519,0.00031183704,0.00006477557,0.00033040417,0.00018111139,0.00046727248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030322191,0.0001099473,0.00042655302,0.0001440685,0.00065301795,0.00014322894,0.000042184936,0.00034898118,0.0000038151024],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005894342,0.0005143612,0.0010479077,0.000022059374,0.00083846407,0.000060123344,0.07015766,0.0000013406033,0.830022,0.075382926,0.015181306,0.0061824527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008060379,0.0075166784,0.4596067,0.00090233557,0.0009109908,0.0030886305,0.2709763,0.0000490407,0.19834702,0.030878523,0.018111449,0.001551947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003001916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000036141417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63167495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007992983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056037963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5116306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392673049","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104604","title":"The influence of dominance and prestige on children's resource allocation: What if they coexist?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation","keywords":"Prestige; Dominance (genetics); Trait; Psychology; Social psychology; Personality; Biology","score_opus":0.05019168972778173,"score_gpt":0.3509815724745811,"score_spread":0.3007898827467994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392673049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9817364,0.003039967,0.0000060994853,0.01302535,0.0008352565,0.00011227467,0.00000412564,0.000009931175,0.0012305632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965808,0.0007527635,0.000028680937,0.0022063947,0.00032040325,0.000004806589,4.5134402e-7,0.000009844918,0.00009588413],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987745,0.00018108619,0.00036885188,0.00022745607,0.00027355048,0.00017453395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993498,0.00022543813,0.00022604011,0.00011213855,0.000028631157,0.000057961737],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028510604,0.000118981,0.00017607697,0.000060405757,0.00024205024,0.00006869808,0.0003147266,0.00008555703,0.000016669352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005847936,0.00008049255,0.000092446884,0.00010226815,0.0006081159,0.00028763697,0.000045017838,0.0002809431,0.000010699405],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016136236,0.0007654976,0.00030304663,0.000011672217,0.000089748406,0.000092910406,0.0062622232,0.00013149607,0.89932406,0.04908126,0.017006379,0.025318103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045021055,0.0060230894,0.61232305,0.00076541654,0.00006925421,0.002736995,0.0025125195,0.000027384394,0.29071668,0.02542741,0.054226957,0.000669133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035474704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.4225639e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003512442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021134294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32823908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396571938","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104621","title":"The effect of financial stress on inhibitory control and economic decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Inhibitory control; Control (management); Social psychology; Stress (linguistics); Finance; Economics; Cognition; Neuroscience; Management","score_opus":0.016576886589881608,"score_gpt":0.3782040225752644,"score_spread":0.3616271359853828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396571938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718795,0.0050094943,0.000060116952,0.0009063946,0.008308079,0.00014790702,0.000020233638,0.000015993439,0.013652273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807256,0.0000857923,0.000008735363,0.00029986934,0.0013988164,0.0000129964865,7.5346065e-7,0.000015890306,0.00010459471],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983958,0.00047630735,0.0005384834,0.00022266874,0.00014188165,0.00022487223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834335,0.0011806996,0.000254288,0.0001255223,0.000017545352,0.00007860887],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006826837,0.00015764043,0.00035295196,0.00011706629,0.00019876732,0.00003394765,0.00017394344,0.00023097814,0.000212243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073158335,0.000100182166,0.00022985847,0.00007020795,0.0003394617,0.00005672591,0.000017954984,0.00046512432,0.00006552862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024007132,0.0010797398,0.024826586,0.000029757579,0.001396608,0.0004991115,0.008304465,0.000022286702,0.13442516,0.07522756,0.32880977,0.40137184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017677339,0.030166114,0.8264325,0.00035733025,0.00026311394,0.00070303585,0.0019706294,0.00003035201,0.016678315,0.007622929,0.09737687,0.00072145875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000018322364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032933017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80160594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007195466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021478116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40853104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398231403","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104631","title":"Endorsing both sides, pleasing neither: Ambivalent individuals face unexpected social costs in political conflicts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Face (sociological concept); Social approval; Social perception; Sociology; Perception; Political science","score_opus":0.07235956591740299,"score_gpt":0.4524705036074812,"score_spread":0.3801109376900782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398231403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95995176,0.0023996779,0.00004230596,0.011384624,0.0040668845,0.00024385581,0.00002119903,0.00006373902,0.02182598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993435,0.000048826583,0.00013411882,0.0013849973,0.0048445356,0.000008352725,0.000003918551,0.00004026336,0.00009999001],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962291,0.0009601442,0.00078879646,0.00027592835,0.0007511329,0.0009948609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988168,0.00043739317,0.000256743,0.00006982126,0.00008936355,0.00032987408],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000701092,0.00023239762,0.00054643163,0.00031432032,0.0005535091,0.00019789819,0.00035820997,0.0004666785,0.00029895647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025223166,0.00024560868,0.00030375787,0.00053911225,0.00089844374,0.0003125589,0.000050568306,0.00075467577,0.000027299937],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025320853,0.0010964009,0.01278676,0.000028000944,0.00032565498,0.00057261594,0.53624886,5.2241444e-7,0.0748797,0.35324278,0.012351116,0.0082144085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005310796,0.0008895347,0.042167544,0.00037009481,0.00017330742,0.00018412134,0.6863713,0.0000109567145,0.011476608,0.01651879,0.23537922,0.0011476765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001313133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010246894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33672398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013580691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004397652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401937981","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104667","title":"Race in the eye of the beholder: Decomposing perceiver- and target-level variation in perceived racial prototypicality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Variation (astronomy); Social psychology; Race (biology); Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.058475782363089986,"score_gpt":0.4293343370990177,"score_spread":0.3708585547359277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401937981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825342,0.0007718056,0.000055154258,0.010099238,0.00148914,0.0003854377,0.0000037830682,0.000005650111,0.004655582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99833095,0.000058116228,0.00017010924,0.00073818525,0.0006370836,0.000015591635,3.9462728e-7,0.000008075164,0.000041500956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975229,0.001231872,0.0005271777,0.00017734908,0.0003062076,0.00023452388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947935,0.0001537267,0.00020759682,0.00007400077,0.000049771454,0.00003553824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014647638,0.00010563196,0.000268616,0.00010812749,0.0002663919,0.000050093055,0.00038184726,0.00022093592,0.00015065247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000103707556,0.00007181151,0.00015859165,0.00037412476,0.0006330126,0.00021691363,0.000036785706,0.0004915103,0.0000021120454],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006137028,0.0011282595,0.034544215,0.000016264394,0.00006785314,0.000035741854,0.7202583,0.0000011232081,0.21753648,0.020204516,0.0014185597,0.0041750055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008133569,0.0001805533,0.9657845,0.000046497553,0.0000117726695,0.000013109304,0.02165773,0.000008327489,0.00019596376,0.006174848,0.0050217244,0.000091643255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055185636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003331714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93124026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017025328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097427575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29283884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402081257","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104671","title":"Fairness revisionism: Reducing discrimination for the future reduces perceived unfairness in the past","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10353425823996397,"score_gpt":0.46529716116409586,"score_spread":0.3617629029241319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402081257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94211954,0.014916839,0.00015925981,0.032911595,0.007521705,0.00037095958,0.000007988111,0.000013906663,0.0019782186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935602,0.00017254586,0.000051909035,0.0006369603,0.0051583042,0.00006045807,0.0000062738886,0.000016874736,0.0003364984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848825,0.00033603815,0.0004804577,0.00023064304,0.00021702865,0.000247603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993368,0.00024230579,0.00019661504,0.00012540421,0.00006823445,0.00003065564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006940542,0.00016135984,0.00025479007,0.000086297005,0.00031680713,0.00014844198,0.0004837006,0.00015674715,0.0003381304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015295136,0.00007867049,0.00028312168,0.00023730574,0.00017620504,0.00016864217,0.00002427883,0.00040225414,0.000011149123],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014325441,0.0012485392,0.0005715804,0.00007186765,0.00046830607,0.00014124477,0.38879687,0.000006269511,0.114073016,0.08736038,0.20652154,0.19930784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020795034,0.001257695,0.48306713,0.0002265088,0.0001775479,0.0006707691,0.45018318,0.000055706023,0.00044794424,0.0052327504,0.05622884,0.00037243913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036924597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008561707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48249555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000694348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019772497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37022907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402120806","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104662","title":"Revisiting the moral forecasting error – A preregistered replication and extension of “Are we more moral than we think?”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Task (project management); Dishonesty; Social psychology; Replication (statistics); Population; Replicate; Sample (material); Cognitive psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.3172571645618302,"score_gpt":0.4169195394818898,"score_spread":0.09966237492005964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402120806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9379463,0.0044700005,0.00006602104,0.05548423,0.0009472505,0.00017710617,0.000009808773,0.000022499267,0.000876734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99725956,0.00023834404,0.00032027136,0.0012340491,0.00081344566,0.0000057822926,0.0000011229945,0.000018418194,0.00010903426],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982654,0.00022687088,0.00056849286,0.00040152197,0.00031229982,0.00022542485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989704,0.0001248127,0.00057046214,0.00021039908,0.0000560404,0.00006792251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054173946,0.00016024878,0.00030221322,0.00010476441,0.00025279308,0.000042811065,0.00027916848,0.000120874036,0.00004008323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010964402,0.00011052802,0.00018351534,0.00019095073,0.00045233712,0.00022794037,0.000092713526,0.0003649452,0.00000372662],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057681365,0.00020118295,0.0008646431,0.00006077247,0.000045643494,0.00015582105,0.0074473885,0.0000064911637,0.9563759,0.00329286,0.0060989745,0.024873497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010119067,0.005592226,0.37151492,0.00508282,0.00044473933,0.022267982,0.04609857,0.007020142,0.44745517,0.06722725,0.0152572235,0.0019198946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005113742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":3.9586374e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5089207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052547723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000206846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45072016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402562418","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104680","title":"Brilliance as gender deviance: Gender-role incongruity as another barrier to women's success in academic fields","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; European Association of Social Psychology","keywords":"Psychology; Deviance (statistics); Social psychology; Gender role; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.13420655461850808,"score_gpt":0.45013361348445435,"score_spread":0.3159270588659463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402562418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9346134,0.0019322012,0.00014176252,0.0034576226,0.0020498831,0.00016678903,0.000006909875,0.00002477604,0.057606626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98952734,0.0001409483,0.00006574396,0.00829072,0.0010828894,0.000009191495,5.630264e-7,0.0000144400565,0.00086815713],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977013,0.0004518432,0.00046592497,0.00030817822,0.00052063813,0.00055213866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935436,0.00006607859,0.00015041039,0.000098141536,0.000080428865,0.00025058698],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013285407,0.0001584644,0.00032814534,0.00017752619,0.0003190212,0.00008578693,0.00054329284,0.0004314637,0.0032483274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010422602,0.00016532543,0.00015825623,0.00044788863,0.00025182197,0.00049912895,0.00009255648,0.0007085258,0.00022844075],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088280236,0.00051614526,0.035731208,0.00004272713,0.00026537332,0.00038133317,0.8441142,0.000010729733,0.041431107,0.031061176,0.0353559,0.010207283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026511804,0.000918423,0.11813676,0.000091825495,0.000039936083,0.00008940412,0.27581307,0.00000615032,0.006594242,0.07432825,0.52030057,0.0010301637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008477913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012968045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56830114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061927486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034352858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99766284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403006643","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104682","title":"Ironic effects of prosocial gossip in driving inaccurate social perceptions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Gossip; Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; Social perception; Social norms approach","score_opus":0.020651830359014942,"score_gpt":0.4146937087058569,"score_spread":0.39404187834684196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403006643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98509884,0.0014646854,0.000114315604,0.0020483332,0.0015850832,0.00017531023,0.0000020393345,0.000021520313,0.009489867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759233,0.00009405998,0.000059250277,0.00012092403,0.0018996882,0.000012881428,0.0000015798475,0.000012728928,0.00020653021],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981267,0.0006880445,0.00047938092,0.00015022076,0.0002928712,0.00026277616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951077,0.00012462332,0.00019688846,0.00003909839,0.00007626488,0.000052333617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007929744,0.000108093314,0.00027124112,0.0001808153,0.00046390452,0.000043507443,0.00020365456,0.00021646603,0.00028667692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007756759,0.000109946006,0.00020034688,0.0004201351,0.0005428436,0.00042984332,0.00002677528,0.0003602546,0.000018010045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031809296,0.0011296602,0.002450244,0.00005249286,0.000117156436,0.000096230055,0.24137707,0.000003991446,0.50796586,0.23108777,0.006600093,0.008801311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010424126,0.0045990176,0.60062486,0.00095349393,0.00032229445,0.00016484072,0.21712582,0.000082602244,0.021803392,0.111421406,0.03060468,0.0018735044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051978837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011115862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5981746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040233997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002640727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44834682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404074520","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104688","title":"Narcissistic vigilance to status cues","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Vigilance (psychology); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.0638718372141827,"score_gpt":0.4692481103150482,"score_spread":0.4053762731008655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404074520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8729323,0.019487852,0.0015328368,0.0096540125,0.015563722,0.0002090316,0.000049174665,0.00009227008,0.080478765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877023,0.000032480082,0.0006603518,0.00787607,0.0024391622,0.00001921814,0.0000035201983,0.00004635079,0.0012205167],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977415,0.00024694655,0.0006826346,0.0004151722,0.00028166707,0.00063208095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999146,0.00011227284,0.00016938549,0.00019153682,0.000074362324,0.00030646723],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043530873,0.00024010292,0.00047769013,0.00031426697,0.0001275595,0.00006676871,0.00037916523,0.00025149787,0.0046341685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023594994,0.00021476585,0.00031143607,0.00039019264,0.00022047701,0.00012319424,0.00003755527,0.00052772515,0.00063524774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022706322,0.0016486249,0.0021380114,0.000031145075,0.0008411856,0.0015966602,0.04623234,0.0000013861923,0.17125082,0.046150673,0.68572617,0.042112377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018993262,0.002681358,0.10534086,0.00008203651,0.00006612479,0.0014571303,0.004530522,0.000001936468,0.0009420359,0.002804453,0.8797119,0.00048228205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025099234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000035360229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1939858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012987001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005728308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404369372","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104696","title":"Black racial phenotypicality: Implications for the #BlackLivesMatter Movement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Movement (music); Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07849118908245546,"score_gpt":0.47124914485645614,"score_spread":0.3927579557740007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404369372","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30789173,0.010602237,0.024599092,0.539479,0.02301035,0.0016352797,0.00006866883,0.0001559446,0.09255767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98099875,0.00013909729,0.00018843511,0.011323593,0.0065095155,0.00005283059,0.0000019193212,0.000021411419,0.0007644538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998514,0.0002293837,0.0004940419,0.00020471428,0.00020541673,0.00035241788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991204,0.00034752875,0.0001932853,0.00010857582,0.00013773417,0.0000924509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008265161,0.00012629172,0.00023977297,0.00007873311,0.0007073045,0.00011091984,0.0004783023,0.00019673261,0.0007275817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006664752,0.00009353149,0.0004080322,0.0002278026,0.0010011166,0.0001775088,0.000034862598,0.00028101276,0.0000604885],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037939553,0.0005322767,0.00039233678,0.000007911064,0.00043287117,0.000005405073,0.08737846,5.893708e-7,0.043222748,0.43863678,0.4052965,0.023714712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095185277,0.00045802144,0.020702403,0.00001624084,0.00008716388,0.000008412311,0.01958167,0.0000054108314,0.0003916418,0.08794715,0.86964536,0.000204653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005410646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041011794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.673107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018945716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010387618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79665095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406441166","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104717","title":"Gifts that keep on giving: Reflected appraisals from gifts and their role in identity and choice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; Queen's University","funders":"Smith School of Business, Queen's University","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Social group; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06643183615533688,"score_gpt":0.46812872443956993,"score_spread":0.40169688828423306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406441166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95313174,0.0037915108,0.000039838123,0.0053330557,0.0012949909,0.00017203725,0.000007694842,0.00002266648,0.03620645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954597,0.00025690557,0.00014472292,0.0035104246,0.00046480983,0.000007973899,9.4885274e-7,0.000011962191,0.00014257207],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979033,0.0006424448,0.00045740238,0.00034640275,0.0002646536,0.00038582034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988231,0.00046600835,0.00039248363,0.000115639756,0.00007085045,0.00013191284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000823955,0.00019481442,0.0004854603,0.00024705543,0.00050741393,0.00009424758,0.00041542313,0.0004046649,0.00010365937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029294466,0.00019226113,0.000099244724,0.0003847644,0.0011171943,0.0005418178,0.000088723114,0.0005391193,0.000005291713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014519705,0.0020704092,0.23975396,0.000012992464,0.00049002736,0.0000977331,0.20144822,8.4569325e-7,0.4860012,0.030646818,0.006740403,0.03128542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002844111,0.00029998535,0.90048975,0.00009281767,0.000017470109,0.00000849645,0.029426439,0.0000013267154,0.003213091,0.041550435,0.021770027,0.0002860599],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014986969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010644832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6607358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017395869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082224535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7840181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408126721","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104736","title":"Closets breed suspicion: Environments that stigmatize concealable identities cast doubt on claims to non-stigmatized identities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04975786709266505,"score_gpt":0.434607520683141,"score_spread":0.38484965359047596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408126721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8605848,0.0016855709,0.0002634502,0.0043974193,0.011200835,0.0005669438,0.000044583005,0.00003335363,0.121223025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96178985,0.00026737546,0.00013228816,0.0075079086,0.0014753424,0.00005814646,0.000011266775,0.00005073238,0.028707102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964898,0.00045727714,0.0011850977,0.00046556263,0.0006116306,0.00079062633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983261,0.00015729413,0.00075827417,0.000395896,0.00007779511,0.00028464556],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005923116,0.0004175681,0.00089281675,0.0006705941,0.0006410741,0.00014964255,0.0007561642,0.00043559226,0.0028137076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031321513,0.00042287415,0.00038672044,0.0003474072,0.0004584905,0.00034226975,0.0001444956,0.00064315577,0.00096530176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003035164,0.002010735,0.018025156,0.00016117354,0.00086274155,0.00033464012,0.015526188,0.000005742332,0.036281705,0.022826767,0.89938956,0.0015404028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.040070083,0.0072849835,0.77721876,0.00046154152,0.00073027186,0.00091814605,0.028838653,0.0000050510616,0.015869156,0.037185967,0.0890894,0.0023279693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037435628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003378933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8103002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005027766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110899244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408350220","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104746","title":"The plurality effect: People are more dishonest toward group than individual targets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Group (periodic table); Chemistry","score_opus":0.02972474548996858,"score_gpt":0.4168255862079196,"score_spread":0.38710084071795103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408350220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9308803,0.0030267928,0.00007904442,0.032279134,0.009605806,0.0003249964,0.000010036668,0.0000394268,0.023754478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953572,0.00014661414,0.00003161291,0.0022380985,0.0018130325,0.0000299385,0.0000035220771,0.000014987112,0.0003649864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99696535,0.00103786,0.00063550717,0.00026921846,0.00051155017,0.0005805409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858016,0.00036830446,0.00061177986,0.0001522204,0.0001443586,0.00014315495],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015617274,0.00021882629,0.000525335,0.00010971081,0.0016225646,0.00013232637,0.0009759838,0.00037459595,0.0001715067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026256536,0.00016213255,0.00044299956,0.00048611083,0.0011951613,0.00023701735,0.00012288596,0.00057430915,0.00001949355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003635135,0.002721324,0.2909184,0.000030749572,0.0014379494,0.0001354651,0.23708573,4.1370816e-7,0.022525128,0.100930355,0.31694525,0.02363411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020577996,0.0006192051,0.84711367,0.000028298358,0.00006387253,0.000018132161,0.06725534,3.310033e-7,0.0005105885,0.0055487826,0.07654112,0.00024284987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051458634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007193374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55619526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023657903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008201603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409302124","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104755","title":"Exploring the gender-portion association in stereotypes, cognition, and treatment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Association (psychology); Cognition; Social cognition; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.16853446652055554,"score_gpt":0.4364010511062946,"score_spread":0.2678665845857391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409302124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9507449,0.00070465595,0.000037335056,0.00911091,0.0023178556,0.00015179679,0.000001175935,0.00000929086,0.036922056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971093,0.0006911841,0.000031381773,0.0011844523,0.00062861206,0.000025596477,9.037108e-7,0.000004854933,0.00032370456],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986928,0.00042434403,0.0003807849,0.00012131958,0.00016747718,0.00021329006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994249,0.000121755664,0.00028786025,0.000043108295,0.000085804735,0.000036598234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006949538,0.000084660525,0.00020503656,0.00013064509,0.00036330387,0.00003475496,0.00011936409,0.000116657124,0.00007700853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082222534,0.00006750151,0.00009176382,0.00024977804,0.00017632185,0.00022682211,0.00001595028,0.00016753092,0.000004866914],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025175414,0.00390005,0.15904409,0.000011422422,0.0012023861,0.000082835184,0.40784207,0.0000011934765,0.10814866,0.11315161,0.041648515,0.16244963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004830948,0.00076037017,0.764589,0.00003676005,0.00009343671,0.000012769117,0.09491088,9.0576594e-7,0.001928717,0.014923016,0.11767322,0.00023994531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00026824354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003492196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6055449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053000066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006237767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27942765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410288843","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104761","title":"Third-party punishment, vigilante justice, or karma? Understanding the dynamics of interpersonal and cosmic justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Karma; Economic Justice; Punishment (psychology); Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Criminology; Dynamics (music); Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.05971262503549638,"score_gpt":0.41737739339719887,"score_spread":0.35766476836170247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410288843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8317737,0.0022555722,0.021102509,0.021441022,0.004749594,0.00037777764,0.000023953671,0.000025970568,0.118249886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972053,0.00025665504,0.000090265945,0.0013525371,0.0003175001,0.0000025379675,0.0000015950801,0.0000047031513,0.0007688782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987386,0.00042086656,0.00035759597,0.00010638058,0.00020346174,0.00017311415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929446,0.0002339489,0.0002860086,0.000053974843,0.00008592938,0.000045663455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083891605,0.00008948908,0.00020027532,0.00008184198,0.00079678814,0.000034045665,0.00023222038,0.00010706763,0.00013480562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000087611814,0.0000651525,0.00007946837,0.00022529179,0.00083049835,0.00019962914,0.000042818745,0.00023992485,0.0000012955393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017179254,0.0003082698,0.0005754087,0.000023837943,0.00015185753,0.000011470065,0.028348086,0.000007035946,0.009362729,0.94834054,0.010593809,0.00055904366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004611966,0.0014199137,0.004384369,0.0002258316,0.00087123096,0.00014269951,0.8948052,0.00078693806,0.001011434,0.08155561,0.009772864,0.00041197258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025681664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012384055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86678493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032179692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016067416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6128331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411225961","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104780","title":"Testing the effects of political rhetoric towards muslims as a facilitator and barrier for intergroup contact","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"UK Research and Innovation; Toronto Metropolitan University","keywords":"Facilitator; Rhetoric; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.03717007345953543,"score_gpt":0.4250842991449416,"score_spread":0.3879142256854062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411225961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613106,0.0014707041,0.00025230774,0.005784581,0.0041670576,0.00038065278,0.000005817038,0.000012522182,0.026615735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611413,0.000019328805,0.00016580486,0.0027294056,0.00076186843,0.000029324092,3.6680268e-7,0.000009099059,0.00017065683],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982463,0.0004304471,0.00050950074,0.00017878921,0.0002018753,0.00043308552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825394,0.0010388708,0.00028284403,0.00007949756,0.00021320813,0.00013164329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007690922,0.00013602158,0.00041312753,0.0001102702,0.00042531267,0.000029199184,0.0003358773,0.00022937154,0.000054862972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018186469,0.00010378294,0.0002410565,0.00023312974,0.0008352012,0.00011049635,0.000053916436,0.00024367284,0.0000018065332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011571017,0.00074361166,0.004798405,0.00006453308,0.00048994966,0.000018732433,0.07912594,1.4266297e-8,0.4446633,0.4300424,0.014280185,0.02461585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016244719,0.015545932,0.31336415,0.00046876707,0.00042079465,0.00012562366,0.333203,0.0000058469864,0.030054124,0.15685683,0.13276084,0.00094938296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004761215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021586015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41460916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018298301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001675013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42321455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412764321","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104805","title":"What types of gratitude expressions promote prosocial behavior?: A registered report","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Gratitude; Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06112815240159746,"score_gpt":0.46304660730537106,"score_spread":0.4019184549037736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412764321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92228293,0.0023339125,0.00025143987,0.0019006272,0.012011679,0.0004135559,0.000005908414,0.000036027464,0.060763936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99560994,0.000060377846,0.0004446679,0.0006135937,0.0006123818,0.000054412194,0.0000057177035,0.000019145695,0.0025797666],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975118,0.00037173138,0.00115298,0.00035904298,0.00028937554,0.00031506066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981669,0.000059861937,0.0011888966,0.00031940307,0.0001723609,0.00009257966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005537633,0.00021222763,0.00059134135,0.00022379521,0.0001932499,0.000040763007,0.00033976548,0.0004313059,0.0006918203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082486884,0.00018260247,0.00035473364,0.0003080898,0.00035889584,0.00023785749,0.000055702814,0.0005022006,0.00001809105],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00283184,0.0062465025,0.01610106,0.000025729103,0.00079237786,0.0010158794,0.015800353,6.8057034e-7,0.81718403,0.0123168975,0.10788333,0.019801335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012202758,0.004498477,0.8187031,0.0006235413,0.00053226453,0.0024801316,0.020210668,9.398803e-7,0.049043443,0.013330616,0.07741999,0.00095408096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000037083388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004528375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80260205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087031025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000063633015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7574947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413120078","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104813","title":"Power as a moral magnifier: Moral outrage is amplified when the powerful transgress","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Connaught Fund; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Outrage; Psychology; Social psychology; Power (physics); Moral disengagement; Political science; Politics; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.047382275117104404,"score_gpt":0.42444101164632636,"score_spread":0.37705873652922195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413120078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5333186,0.0017046509,0.00014149235,0.06065673,0.00685635,0.00030462214,0.000009772088,0.000035124034,0.3969727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97129774,0.000081827246,0.000090027104,0.022361318,0.0010453984,0.000011600028,0.0000011918754,0.000020417088,0.0050904606],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971925,0.00066094205,0.0007370274,0.00031350512,0.0004919526,0.000604043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989055,0.00011930726,0.0004208064,0.00020180305,0.00020146655,0.00015111202],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008639434,0.00024339423,0.00051374093,0.0001750545,0.0008023484,0.000116906434,0.0010351983,0.00044314665,0.0049243565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000746721,0.00019219413,0.00055493903,0.0003758261,0.0013944466,0.00026286067,0.000059012098,0.00067686016,0.00011383868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019418793,0.0014303775,0.0039489227,0.000005179652,0.00051737105,0.000118363496,0.2099971,1.6855175e-7,0.023816848,0.16994284,0.583874,0.004406959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059913164,0.0017896922,0.0399094,0.000057535293,0.00013078189,0.000089658686,0.12832192,8.392077e-7,0.0034625002,0.15089245,0.6686859,0.0006680123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046617794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006261239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43797916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001948183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018942411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99598527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413398945","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104808","title":"The do-gooder dilemma: A self/other asymmetry in the perceived emotional costs of self-reporting good deeds","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Cornell University","keywords":"Psychology; Dilemma; Social psychology; Self-disclosure; Social desirability; Asymmetry; Self-deception; Social perception; Perception; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03327892825533028,"score_gpt":0.42373644208177735,"score_spread":0.39045751382644706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413398945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8768192,0.00097298855,0.000037668146,0.0087501975,0.0023343517,0.00023432956,0.000002072128,0.00001684485,0.110832356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99612254,0.00009731619,0.00017546919,0.002520389,0.00093401,0.000015778807,5.1463434e-7,0.000011838279,0.00012212344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639004,0.0012084752,0.0012919456,0.00019955877,0.0004948274,0.00041514472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977191,0.00045574637,0.0014146636,0.0001426251,0.00021403914,0.000053841934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029570682,0.00015718129,0.0003970294,0.00015000037,0.0007730547,0.00006800596,0.00075607083,0.00029073146,0.00016066195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033736587,0.00010502222,0.00034923037,0.0005942136,0.0006108598,0.00015198319,0.00005303085,0.00052998035,0.0000065020263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009210724,0.0059548374,0.133626,0.000014540195,0.0013168531,0.000086248685,0.30476138,0.0000014179304,0.033662055,0.45607597,0.05057904,0.013000591],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003992467,0.00077257515,0.69222194,0.000102638805,0.00010241191,0.000087972905,0.19817185,0.0000044734456,0.00036604385,0.014762671,0.08907088,0.00034408897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041688792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024751178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55859596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003229415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019585076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.594579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415665342","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104961","title":"Persuasion via Intermediaries: The Pull of Extremity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Intermediary; Preference; Position (finance); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03934867242396043,"score_gpt":0.45260019458505224,"score_spread":0.4132515221610918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415665342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88848674,0.00232158,0.0009918729,0.020755993,0.0053735715,0.00023112184,0.0000030329709,0.000019747024,0.08181637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959622,0.00012176019,0.00016673855,0.0027216747,0.00063578144,0.00000515664,3.4082467e-7,0.0000071613877,0.0003791549],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799883,0.00056775706,0.0006126069,0.0001619938,0.00035494988,0.0003038816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870783,0.0002310933,0.0006202679,0.00014140196,0.00022763695,0.00007174204],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013244376,0.00012283506,0.00035725482,0.0001347021,0.0006472724,0.000022844957,0.0008268746,0.00029268055,0.0003362373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025946175,0.00009904851,0.00027415252,0.00040852322,0.0039216736,0.00020309995,0.00007482543,0.00044760344,0.0000093319395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019689647,0.0023511844,0.027538257,0.000018196788,0.0006112365,0.00005276513,0.25852004,0.0000010435165,0.41923946,0.10451813,0.12960148,0.05557926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007624157,0.0014391415,0.22159016,0.00024551488,0.00024239384,0.00008145982,0.2837274,0.000005799849,0.02137201,0.096943825,0.36589143,0.00083669485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001915204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004673638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39786747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019420714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018068253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416319964","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104851","title":"Individuating rather than group information dominates evaluations of members from newly learned social groups","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Université Catholique de Louvain","keywords":"Impression formation; Perception; Salient; Social perception; Social cognition; Cognition; Dominance (genetics); Social group; Group (periodic table)","score_opus":0.05589216525606449,"score_gpt":0.42794776317710165,"score_spread":0.37205559792103715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416319964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9563231,0.00027297545,0.012756388,0.0028601289,0.0027794328,0.00022822962,0.0000191226,0.000024709772,0.02473591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971165,0.000006813075,0.00078517094,0.0013611985,0.00044525007,0.00001616428,0.000065230524,0.000012527062,0.00019111876],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997981,0.0004235991,0.0009644825,0.00013889301,0.00031164938,0.00018036786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830455,0.000118685784,0.0011820297,0.00009983302,0.0002555396,0.00003936872],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058423623,0.00014558868,0.00034372637,0.00028519527,0.00028007737,0.000036381796,0.00022521739,0.00028080467,0.0030845185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089448906,0.00014732667,0.00019985517,0.00037507468,0.00015944349,0.0005330525,0.00003522103,0.00028369043,0.000038427737],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041180346,0.0038532887,0.054304723,0.00003777747,0.0027479765,0.000009688797,0.25768653,0.00007485879,0.27213418,0.11087094,0.14001186,0.15415014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016696302,0.0008972404,0.8525377,0.00006114958,0.0002646646,0.000018974555,0.09013744,0.0002032535,0.006372105,0.011568951,0.020765206,0.00047702296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010093497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009949413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.798233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001532947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006084071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416345862","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104847","title":"A longitudinal test of the effectiveness of four interventions to reduce discrimination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Context (archaeology); Intervention (counseling); Test (biology); Component (thermodynamics); Cognitive bias","score_opus":0.08641408758137174,"score_gpt":0.4718893835262133,"score_spread":0.38547529594484153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416345862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794876,0.0007085324,0.00076100737,0.0010962118,0.0035867,0.0003029702,0.000017090013,0.0000056134754,0.0140342675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989425,0.000002287599,0.00013688752,0.00013732385,0.00013421256,0.000031206895,0.0000014359557,0.0000099648405,0.00060421403],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806076,0.00068461214,0.0007300209,0.0001928537,0.00015810168,0.00017365483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872094,0.0002613458,0.0005503988,0.00022178493,0.00020662848,0.000038882634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008158351,0.00012634258,0.00037795972,0.00027313066,0.00013983693,0.000004407833,0.00044631385,0.0001724024,0.00047523665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000108829394,0.00010313921,0.0004752246,0.00035836038,0.00042017346,0.0000715547,0.00007682533,0.00028062126,0.000009517051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003840174,0.00782235,0.16576768,0.00012073638,0.00039228695,0.000020123192,0.0040662084,0.0000027954804,0.71793205,0.080786556,0.017580314,0.0016687172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018092273,0.0010082789,0.97953683,0.00025077033,0.00011008503,0.00007882721,0.0011012309,7.4403836e-8,0.013539594,0.0023312417,0.00016054901,0.00007328129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016882446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007761753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81376916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009551309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003949467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5203508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}