{"meta":{"query_hash":"e030867b0ef5","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology"},"cohort_total":165,"direct_labels_cover":1,"predictions_cover":165,"exported":165,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/e030867b0ef5","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Experimental+Social+Psychology"},"results":[{"id":"W1119084953","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.009","title":"Conceptualizing and evaluating the replication of research results","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Replicate; Ambiguity; Replication (statistics); Psychology; Robustness (evolution); Meta-analysis; Research design; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Management science; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.9675545174065701,"score_gpt":0.7654175320638141,"score_spread":0.20213698534275593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1119084953","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09107192,0.36273652,0.39063993,0.054286033,0.021750465,0.06193108,0.0037499496,0.0018652574,0.011968896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51933134,0.026586577,0.4039833,0.009130599,0.0026864745,0.035109766,0.0020590657,0.00045539456,0.0006575191],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.1395568,0.58912754,0.18360072,0.027911777,0.057700798,0.0021023944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.035500623,0.8130508,0.047755096,0.07093995,0.031445466,0.0013081065],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.73761314,0.007231494,0.0142676085,0.02554104,0.0050176303,0.020713322,0.017976215,0.017642537,0.0025721742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9425471,0.008360351,0.025162004,0.013123432,0.019100178,0.018692937,0.01294258,0.010266228,0.00070370885],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0067881932,0.0006413792,0.058017083,0.20271209,0.46974218,0.0016911618,0.017237261,0.006612972,0.004008632,0.03856222,0.008122762,0.1858641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017717607,0.0055042054,0.030166283,0.14334744,0.44531232,0.0020383175,0.007106988,0.02999839,0.017090628,0.2593881,0.04067658,0.0016531768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008228647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073839244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26238686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011723455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028074125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32356977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1442152979","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.005","title":"The robustness of the win–win effect","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Medal; Earnings; Robustness (evolution); Inequality; Per capita; Demographic economics; Population; Gender equality; Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Econometrics; Social psychology; Economics; Geography; Sociology; Statistics; Demography; Mathematics; Accounting; Gender studies","score_opus":0.0572680450239155,"score_gpt":0.32581186614852276,"score_spread":0.2685438211246073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1442152979","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6730971,0.0064064297,0.14992882,0.018599492,0.0027194761,0.0012146363,0.013247504,0.0019570827,0.13282953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878215,0.00022470695,0.0045684087,0.0011602596,0.0003183078,0.00028654654,0.0014295343,0.0002265618,0.003964052],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9666541,0.013567242,0.0017614489,0.011158667,0.0051694848,0.0016889521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6491002,0.2677854,0.028901724,0.043653768,0.007598946,0.0029599608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05181627,0.0008580009,0.0019510429,0.0017258838,0.0023937125,0.0042505385,0.002754752,0.0018804794,0.030292109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27150065,0.00048986456,0.002174097,0.001866075,0.0062253233,0.0045988467,0.0053201653,0.004172445,0.0048330324],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005170474,0.0007597158,0.640051,0.0013689062,0.00868709,0.0014094649,0.0049774274,0.013586439,0.003255781,0.15448241,0.04472989,0.121521465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008158483,0.0014366627,0.51101595,0.00045103766,0.002680751,0.0009872363,0.004686444,0.03235218,0.0051860427,0.37471864,0.06540416,0.00026509803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006327036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032736452,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05181627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009867413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001868728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2740339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1967146094","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.004","title":"Victims versus perpetrators: Affective and empathic forecasting regarding transgressions in romantic relationships","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Redeemer University","funders":"University of Chicago; John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Sadness; Psychology; Social psychology; Romance; Empathy; Marine transgression; Developmental psychology; Anger; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.11612031853295535,"score_gpt":0.46078451218818156,"score_spread":0.3446641936552262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967146094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99726796,0.000046830097,0.00021956793,0.000109667024,0.000008198902,0.0000072371818,0.000019613146,0.0000029206772,0.002318015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995414,0.0000536452,0.00008593597,0.000019348056,0.0000068906147,0.0000045416923,0.000029982946,0.0000027041506,0.000255604],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993266,0.00031887964,0.000040633775,0.00007555536,0.0001477971,0.00009051481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928974,0.004227882,0.0014676105,0.00032200932,0.00046695553,0.0006181426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001867486,0.00019848735,0.00027236278,0.00061444036,0.0006824073,0.0020106272,0.0003209169,0.00094094424,0.004069388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024055757,0.00026238288,0.00015380786,0.00034867323,0.00065861834,0.0018935141,0.00096643466,0.0012963433,0.00047663672],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004088564,0.0007092033,0.8838347,0.00009625661,0.00013670466,0.00081706885,0.033108115,0.0012818588,0.015269356,0.0025626933,0.0008433628,0.05725222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037681886,0.0006443845,0.9573311,0.00005775121,0.000081868304,0.0008026963,0.03049974,0.0055798776,0.0018641395,0.0023397508,0.00070989184,0.00005109535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010071732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014415949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004069388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023977028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002526893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013613462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1968915972","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.003","title":"A smart unconscious? Procedural origins of automatic partner attitudes in marriage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Unconscious mind; Psychology; Social connectedness; Social psychology; Test (biology); Interpersonal communication; Developmental psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.03294097982514329,"score_gpt":0.462269998932842,"score_spread":0.4293290191076987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968915972","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9691915,0.000065352135,0.012133358,0.0006199953,0.000025540427,0.000019009922,0.000043434877,0.00005412619,0.017847743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984011,0.000019141438,0.0010426873,0.00003423791,0.000005476849,0.0000050546073,0.000012263635,0.000017513636,0.00046253882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927646,0.00029797878,0.000029563462,0.00012490919,0.00017406809,0.000097096214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99632984,0.001832577,0.0004750993,0.0007632618,0.0003115486,0.00028764477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016281178,0.00009234167,0.00019102762,0.00031097792,0.0005401884,0.0021013732,0.0004546014,0.0007869259,0.0036354393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01085329,0.0004234248,0.00014702241,0.0003030335,0.0017014844,0.0018148887,0.0011086605,0.0013888765,0.00040214293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000723764,0.0006719094,0.12971091,0.00018561597,0.00014784279,0.000760971,0.041708726,0.0038823513,0.13066529,0.5826664,0.0015392147,0.107337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013544293,0.00034394258,0.5427096,0.0000733239,0.00007879909,0.00079572876,0.006888659,0.024588954,0.012629171,0.40703663,0.0045622424,0.00015763193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090752076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012044235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036354393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031744433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048103766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012161732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970395039","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1486","title":"Spontaneous Trait Associations and the Case of the Superstitious Banana","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Trait; Psychology; Social psychology; Associative property; Context (archaeology); Perception; Impression formation; Cognitive psychology; Social perception; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.09091430104588274,"score_gpt":0.3967145039717399,"score_spread":0.3058002029258572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970395039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96644664,0.00008529258,0.0060452987,0.00047376115,0.000032948734,0.000026562022,0.00004086373,0.000047811733,0.02680083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777716,0.000029456281,0.0013673417,0.000048985326,0.000011405413,0.000010694497,0.000023452321,0.000012622534,0.0007187746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844754,0.00072028616,0.00006586413,0.00029088455,0.00033979595,0.00013559677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9855076,0.0076660467,0.0010538342,0.004780407,0.00064289116,0.00034927877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026702909,0.00013173689,0.00028139938,0.00052441313,0.0012491441,0.0023019416,0.000722013,0.0016192432,0.0053541567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024059737,0.00039393725,0.00023063972,0.00043289136,0.002090033,0.002308288,0.0011288384,0.0018236447,0.00048204584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020955787,0.0010920006,0.077560715,0.00026196195,0.00023816005,0.0042197714,0.02725578,0.0017412741,0.1909522,0.6201566,0.002189511,0.072236545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039085347,0.001367548,0.25110573,0.00010312644,0.0003371886,0.021662813,0.012555587,0.045077752,0.043891918,0.60492146,0.018261392,0.00032470498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001209107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011438832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0053541567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029753012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025683228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017911494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970992785","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.021","title":"A regulatory focus model of self-evaluation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Certainty; Social psychology; Self-esteem; Focus (optics); Perception; Focus group; Self-affirmation; Political science; Marketing; Business","score_opus":0.11086443516665628,"score_gpt":0.48209143602053217,"score_spread":0.3712270008538759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970992785","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060883313,0.0006535423,0.7073282,0.005696108,0.00017940623,0.0002723714,0.0001378305,0.00034127987,0.22450791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.928943,0.00025290038,0.0430842,0.0005211039,0.00008908203,0.0003873119,0.00005841585,0.00006517374,0.026598781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997879,0.0011406611,0.00004733909,0.00027325,0.0004743949,0.000185319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99552166,0.0026394285,0.0002457835,0.00053196447,0.0008137939,0.0002474517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041327197,0.00061676226,0.0003870276,0.00092952,0.0006078792,0.0020739194,0.0012461197,0.0014991616,0.016402448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009295353,0.000424768,0.000707731,0.0004670624,0.0019311329,0.0033590996,0.0009843741,0.0014859332,0.0020347007],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006574426,0.00014530521,0.001090908,0.00004159873,0.00003220005,0.00006186955,0.000713343,0.0042094705,0.0010242406,0.96522963,0.0014007282,0.025984908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008994585,0.00019929322,0.0025262036,0.000045414934,0.000055892546,0.00013936081,0.00030232174,0.074238755,0.0008614218,0.91656756,0.004946173,0.000027715272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017287066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009954068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016402448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010921233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011720725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05487168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1971708490","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.024","title":"When deserving translates into causing: The effect of cognitive load on immanent justice reasoning","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Accident (philosophy); Psychology; Attribution; Economic Justice; Social psychology; Cognition; Mediation; Cognitive load; Moral reasoning; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.061337653470037966,"score_gpt":0.37796021070441627,"score_spread":0.3166225572343783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971708490","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783836,0.00013545166,0.0020923666,0.00088983943,0.00011631495,0.00004650817,0.00011918552,0.00009422023,0.018122563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99538404,0.00009441431,0.0016244889,0.0003421327,0.000118365155,0.000037120608,0.00014334334,0.00022204265,0.0020340425],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964276,0.0009774441,0.00024281436,0.00071451557,0.0012862557,0.00035134956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88375616,0.09629941,0.006441903,0.0066423668,0.0026978136,0.004162403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004987603,0.00066612277,0.00074549066,0.00067675195,0.00096067734,0.0050871056,0.0015300529,0.0018224153,0.01963412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11427871,0.0007080518,0.00042164704,0.00044043138,0.0019221215,0.006626285,0.0022863094,0.0032380647,0.0015872696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.092818074,0.028491592,0.16645136,0.0016582798,0.0013055439,0.0033678468,0.027328735,0.025085889,0.28574502,0.041554548,0.01033405,0.31585902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051271976,0.005440236,0.5025853,0.00043055697,0.0012100239,0.002382016,0.00904977,0.090570524,0.04179924,0.33244243,0.008181339,0.00078142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024643978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019131028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01963412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069913594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011458903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06568271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1973815765","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2006.10.009","title":"The hidden sides of self-esteem: Two dimensions of implicit self-esteem and their relation to narcissistic reactions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Self-esteem; Narcissism; Feeling; Social psychology; Implicit attitude; Relation (database); Attractiveness; Self; Implicit personality theory; Physical attractiveness; Personality; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.031284945032602554,"score_gpt":0.3765754367595175,"score_spread":0.34529049172691495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1973815765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990829,0.00008871207,0.0002437602,0.00006786888,0.0000028014595,0.0000026730795,0.000007398439,9.933906e-7,0.0005028986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997117,0.000037987167,0.00013208417,0.000010560662,0.000005618325,0.0000034685797,0.000010626594,0.0000010002293,0.00008700318],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999175,0.0003913676,0.0000643701,0.00008603852,0.00020856889,0.000074725045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865943,0.0067454367,0.0038446072,0.0010530739,0.00074099255,0.0010215867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016422308,0.00021851942,0.0002657183,0.00067962555,0.0002285764,0.0011261808,0.00026772317,0.0004762829,0.0019472343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013715881,0.00017725382,0.00028679555,0.00039234894,0.0015492147,0.0007659387,0.0011143989,0.0014218404,0.000099699886],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073908566,0.0003233166,0.97000366,0.000052119132,0.000118526645,0.00015794097,0.0032968766,0.00018327731,0.005393777,0.0012904309,0.00003467637,0.018406423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012523929,0.0001685598,0.9961081,0.000018356966,0.000024924151,0.0002948259,0.0009914464,0.000642654,0.0005927361,0.0010427977,0.000089916124,0.000013152305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036338234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005360702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0019472343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014943647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022887821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008685052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1974516241","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.015","title":"The consequences of faking anger in negotiations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Conflict Management and Negotiation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":193,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Anger; Psychology; Negotiation; Social psychology; Perception; Sociology","score_opus":0.055421882302903215,"score_gpt":0.4199467660872307,"score_spread":0.36452488378432746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1974516241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796459,0.0001814259,0.0006449929,0.00073017855,0.00006561818,0.000023439497,0.000033213742,0.00001226892,0.018662907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99924767,0.000053679327,0.0001544589,0.000057310364,0.000021247732,0.000009084253,0.000011149872,0.0000073907163,0.00043810892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532723,0.003027025,0.00020405535,0.00019808754,0.00083083694,0.00041275306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95876235,0.028160078,0.006612176,0.003588853,0.0012835169,0.0015930177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003664001,0.00037865358,0.0004119017,0.0007677634,0.0016346128,0.0029979327,0.0004030047,0.0020364008,0.007133732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04442522,0.0005251582,0.00028543058,0.00036386627,0.0017863163,0.0015833428,0.0012186813,0.002501674,0.00053438003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031721916,0.007861417,0.5176506,0.00081796484,0.0008587978,0.0064626858,0.04179541,0.010105972,0.09388032,0.09892621,0.00720046,0.18271823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009709966,0.003052569,0.8758846,0.00023220349,0.0004609501,0.005432182,0.017863967,0.020736812,0.010833263,0.05934627,0.0049020946,0.00028401182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00065923505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006549247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007133732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005464791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040758596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023864686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1976556153","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.002","title":"Averted eye-gaze disrupts configural face encoding","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Gaze; Psychology; Encoding (memory); Cognitive psychology; Eye movement; Face perception; Eye tracking; Face (sociological concept); Perception; Social psychology; Neuroscience; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Linguistics","score_opus":0.08031738985376341,"score_gpt":0.41386983656571025,"score_spread":0.33355244671194684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1976556153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99458236,0.00019561405,0.002126261,0.00051651517,0.00046177374,0.000043878983,0.00030378567,0.00028355498,0.0014861457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958111,0.0001470905,0.00092842575,0.00029862547,0.00005111141,0.00005655225,0.00014721735,0.00023937359,0.002320468],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999255,0.00008071972,0.00007617242,0.00018165384,0.00020563632,0.00020083635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817264,0.0006357308,0.00030448913,0.00038089792,0.0000967604,0.00040953918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041905686,0.000719269,0.0007431276,0.00059035525,0.00046487994,0.0006168422,0.0008724901,0.0012078931,0.008651503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023748905,0.00066157855,0.00035574252,0.00019762828,0.0013807775,0.0006783647,0.0010581994,0.003331608,0.0009481613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011606277,0.00018137481,0.00024273756,0.000023643408,0.00001543828,0.00011229473,0.000042373904,0.00007964057,0.9957496,0.00030519866,0.00019187166,0.0018952221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073452113,0.002530904,0.061320934,0.00005004408,0.000095695206,0.0014538208,0.00036536646,0.010694179,0.917325,0.0030088408,0.002340071,0.00008058882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00417636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00572154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008651503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080362626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007347003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028942108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978668780","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.04.013","title":"An affirmed self and a better apology: The effect of self-affirmation on transgressors' responses to victims","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Blame; Conflict resolution; Interpersonal relationship; Self-image; Interpersonal interaction; Self-disclosure; Belongingness","score_opus":0.012288816342634765,"score_gpt":0.37868810795774654,"score_spread":0.36639929161511176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978668780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950659,0.000039767132,0.00008313411,0.0003548994,0.00003890547,0.000020852121,0.0000150171145,0.00000506309,0.004376363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99878424,0.000047412002,0.00018718293,0.0001717636,0.000024010236,0.000033646284,0.000014986026,0.000009418653,0.00072721805],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957859,0.0028880853,0.00017602839,0.00031969362,0.0005249234,0.00030533902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89573383,0.0869225,0.008224443,0.003568818,0.0015558453,0.003994648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047776317,0.00045894092,0.0005146612,0.00037227516,0.0012598664,0.002232079,0.00096440146,0.0023828663,0.0115848845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066542275,0.0004730812,0.00034274848,0.0002024168,0.0023846691,0.0016796634,0.0016571388,0.0042040977,0.0005897965],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.09975153,0.049832366,0.35426012,0.0019181834,0.001697369,0.004760675,0.16229814,0.004950236,0.18294099,0.019987922,0.0050134314,0.1125891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022849028,0.00961798,0.9105622,0.0002988287,0.00054155645,0.0013916626,0.04493409,0.0035258697,0.013120412,0.008951872,0.0045737796,0.00019692276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008133434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011021061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0115848845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005363786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007893453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038755298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1979521699","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.008","title":"Planning for the near and distant future: How does temporal distance affect task completion predictions?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Construals; Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Task (project management); Cognition; Cognitive psychology; Focus (optics); Construal level theory; Social psychology; Everyday life; Goal pursuit; Cognitive resource theory; Communication","score_opus":0.05653217320008444,"score_gpt":0.44726194419836807,"score_spread":0.39072977099828365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1979521699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98764384,0.00016173451,0.006176109,0.00032745136,0.000037029396,0.000057416226,0.0003169016,0.000055099656,0.0052243103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99695337,0.00007381067,0.0019224063,0.000067164634,0.000013671113,0.000041628686,0.00028668923,0.000049041602,0.0005922128],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998531,0.00044747503,0.00008322899,0.0004937983,0.00030024094,0.00014434583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9613792,0.027528247,0.005625929,0.0024770254,0.0012309923,0.0017586027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048069484,0.00048350837,0.00064907403,0.00062705687,0.00040834548,0.003119224,0.0011784688,0.0020396663,0.0065890225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057210576,0.000821209,0.0006274069,0.0005056905,0.00069033355,0.0029282295,0.0010361301,0.0019481212,0.0011938432],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010956691,0.0025263769,0.84347206,0.00031116762,0.00089484034,0.0003928298,0.003846765,0.03770708,0.018427161,0.0066248486,0.0028167353,0.07202351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037707062,0.0013169571,0.86941564,0.00009883538,0.0004800693,0.0003285094,0.0009955006,0.09619907,0.0040645483,0.024884064,0.0016719766,0.00016782683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00475132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005184799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065890225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055303395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007221929,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025421917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981075471","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.005","title":"Eyes on the prize: The longitudinal benefits of goal focus on progress toward a weight loss goal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism","keywords":"Psychology; Goal setting; Goal pursuit; Focus (optics); Goal orientation; Longitudinal study; Weight loss; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Obesity","score_opus":0.1562193337091087,"score_gpt":0.4489422929706129,"score_spread":0.29272295926150416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981075471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973097,0.00021468484,0.00010361322,0.0002425505,0.000054967044,0.00003191778,0.00028423927,0.000017269562,0.001741077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624205,0.00015666375,0.0003187068,0.0001284095,0.00003866559,0.00008673529,0.00038985853,0.000023057428,0.0026158118],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990097,0.0003768407,0.00004648737,0.00020778182,0.0001925487,0.00016660569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833903,0.005948977,0.0036697136,0.0029136206,0.0011704823,0.0029068429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003505222,0.00037428466,0.00069988385,0.00066651107,0.001300491,0.0019684772,0.00085456745,0.0019827508,0.007729556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031027518,0.0006074014,0.00058409764,0.00060034293,0.00070444826,0.0023807338,0.0021622828,0.0022700066,0.0011224974],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.032714657,0.018419627,0.85808516,0.00020351636,0.0010853803,0.00022523146,0.0030943486,0.0013263386,0.003618257,0.0019870591,0.0066303373,0.072610095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034207143,0.0022891914,0.9928699,0.000026924661,0.00022498769,0.00005582118,0.0005333008,0.00056599727,0.00042544873,0.0012069496,0.0014114782,0.00004793408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007454368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0088229645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007729556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042160746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008477754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025857925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986276679","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2007.01.003","title":"Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":129,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Subliminal stimuli; Priming (agriculture); Attribution; Social psychology; Action (physics); Affect (linguistics); Communication","score_opus":0.09494325636184062,"score_gpt":0.3883624345882632,"score_spread":0.2934191782264226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986276679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99178797,0.00016698195,0.0008565337,0.00018144747,0.00018510473,0.000102918166,0.00012232878,0.00006222273,0.0065344423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943374,0.00020323087,0.0018627917,0.00025633085,0.0001547369,0.00018036569,0.00016993892,0.00020795157,0.0026273492],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914575,0.00018206859,0.00007381612,0.00029815096,0.00013680934,0.00016333508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97648185,0.018222228,0.0018456037,0.0010617778,0.00044581798,0.0019427188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018096381,0.0012296442,0.0010170246,0.00041436512,0.00054146786,0.0014902026,0.0009027558,0.0013620418,0.018139848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020744232,0.0011722947,0.00031099276,0.00040478585,0.0016454542,0.0021762156,0.0015979222,0.0026981812,0.0011792948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11072723,0.004882425,0.005666551,0.00089088036,0.0001271255,0.000485953,0.0038160104,0.00044169414,0.8474688,0.0040967697,0.00089344353,0.020503249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016669102,0.018869985,0.46352047,0.00036460545,0.0012695409,0.002307412,0.0023857893,0.012571573,0.45800066,0.020324033,0.0034263683,0.00029045242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083948387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096066674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018139848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045447794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008429776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060683787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987247533","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.08.005","title":"Self-affirmation as a deliberate coping strategy: The moderating role of choice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Self-affirmation; Psychology; Social psychology; Coping (psychology); Psychological intervention; Everyday life; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04792404857337375,"score_gpt":0.4278791847146145,"score_spread":0.37995513614124077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987247533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957289,0.00013884032,0.00057929184,0.00055756513,0.000059918064,0.000027255712,0.000069086134,0.000008723461,0.0028303845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692947,0.00011100124,0.0009958389,0.00016574253,0.00004394455,0.00004817719,0.000053151816,0.000040671533,0.0016120325],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971546,0.001549379,0.000109534674,0.0005217107,0.00031638346,0.0003484004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9550901,0.035598125,0.0034959852,0.002722019,0.00058429013,0.0025094526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052137086,0.0005358804,0.00063096825,0.0003886214,0.0007865937,0.0031190596,0.00082390016,0.0018926464,0.015658798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024897395,0.00056093687,0.00050298666,0.00043963082,0.001440283,0.0020929687,0.001443123,0.0024395566,0.0007074037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03799557,0.014773135,0.76393956,0.000718011,0.0019764171,0.0010137346,0.018839704,0.0031422623,0.046177268,0.017854765,0.0025197382,0.09104977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012352754,0.0019234625,0.95970154,0.00012293301,0.000813122,0.00033290722,0.0031060611,0.006989934,0.0040640174,0.018899785,0.0026983663,0.000112538444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013834006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019127714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015658798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000342316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00142019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0523839},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989142311","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.02.012","title":"Value from adversity: How we deal with adversity matters","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Anagrams; Anagram; Psychology; Feeling; Coping (psychology); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Clinical psychology; Task (project management)","score_opus":0.0919468500900882,"score_gpt":0.3282707576474577,"score_spread":0.23632390755736954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989142311","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21248181,0.008647234,0.14648816,0.31935537,0.0028569498,0.00008722196,0.00023041524,0.00016393256,0.30968902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797315,0.0013387451,0.007295633,0.0058915433,0.00035489356,0.000026788859,0.000041991294,0.000087779,0.0052310894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974642,0.0013255643,0.000054735592,0.00031514023,0.0005257271,0.00031468555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99364483,0.002647111,0.0007635991,0.0006684984,0.0009399599,0.0013360364],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042220904,0.00046834708,0.0004897346,0.00071905553,0.0021548942,0.006348675,0.0012902502,0.0036240644,0.008137907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020259025,0.00031755297,0.00035402807,0.0005659579,0.009882099,0.01268617,0.002955551,0.0058827866,0.000891018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001352418,0.00021780621,0.012149502,0.00015941625,0.00016425879,0.0006185279,0.010403075,0.00330871,0.00198081,0.88121194,0.018197581,0.071453184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010820547,0.00002853617,0.00406982,0.000051706145,0.000026381727,0.0002064277,0.0030171494,0.0017213296,0.00035149898,0.97494966,0.015533139,0.000033522298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002257164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031846988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008137907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015391127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018918827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027224004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990939807","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.016","title":"The perils of double consciousness: The role of thought suppression in stereotype threat","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Stereotype threat; Psychology; Stereotype (UML); Test (biology); Cognition; Social psychology; Thought suppression; Cognitive resource theory; Consciousness; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.044405415335225996,"score_gpt":0.4011112249627319,"score_spread":0.35670580962750587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990939807","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89214534,0.0007911204,0.017046891,0.005618866,0.00045949352,0.000098128294,0.00014448032,0.00012292268,0.08357282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996505,0.00011567598,0.002161694,0.0002883917,0.00006966338,0.00003629985,0.000026378197,0.0000451777,0.0007518094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989448,0.0003875723,0.000031961332,0.00014066446,0.00036409538,0.0001309726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99177575,0.0044264686,0.0011689019,0.0014241914,0.00044484108,0.0007597756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019486062,0.00028969397,0.0003066477,0.000768204,0.00081432745,0.0030530596,0.0006949417,0.0012302024,0.005801897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01829373,0.00044818316,0.0002480089,0.0002898354,0.0034734756,0.0039196126,0.0019231507,0.0030939276,0.00033869874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007171546,0.0019014379,0.04402172,0.00073686783,0.00015222248,0.0017598663,0.03229088,0.0026327563,0.23919497,0.47564003,0.0054435795,0.18905415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007266878,0.0012322052,0.17746972,0.0003433514,0.00017741529,0.0020848864,0.010296467,0.015540138,0.025256861,0.7558604,0.010822667,0.00018926688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00055675366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004441771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005801897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004278618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011012738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01940924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994012767","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.001","title":"Perpetrator groups can enhance their moral self-image by accepting their own intergroup apologies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Self-image","score_opus":0.04563872971101492,"score_gpt":0.38453511596027695,"score_spread":0.33889638624926205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994012767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9867077,0.000047944814,0.00068184605,0.00035523452,0.000062247185,0.000018433058,0.0000076122415,0.00002065931,0.012098286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957931,0.00004531525,0.0006976964,0.000094980445,0.000017507078,0.0000142291765,0.000013773726,0.000013559744,0.0033098774],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991084,0.00041662276,0.000030213485,0.000066591456,0.00021475209,0.0001634117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974468,0.00064350356,0.00080783584,0.0003713885,0.00016163297,0.00056896923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008932801,0.00042627938,0.0003120801,0.0004985107,0.0014605604,0.0019987691,0.00030815674,0.0008976348,0.01308137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005151132,0.00019051974,0.00019274653,0.00012722464,0.0010245582,0.0007770368,0.0018989877,0.0013527876,0.0010148213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036163754,0.015962232,0.20170982,0.0005643822,0.0004495457,0.0064827134,0.12215577,0.0006572858,0.3676096,0.056650255,0.010897059,0.2132451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095442793,0.012784319,0.54766315,0.0006517301,0.00063751615,0.019581577,0.17177668,0.0057752253,0.12535174,0.05324161,0.061301034,0.00028100418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014561508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024797936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01308137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015115259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002633666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04376155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2001433886","doi":"10.1006/jesp.1999.1417","title":"What the Motivated Mind Sees: Comparing Friends' Perspectives to Married Partners' Views of Each Other","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Spouse; Virtue; Social psychology; Perception; Contrast (vision); Cognition; Epistemology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08604302230514567,"score_gpt":0.49937270230716146,"score_spread":0.4133296800020158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001433886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904295,0.00012811497,0.0002726138,0.00030738613,0.000014836624,0.0000047120734,0.000018240868,0.0000027859917,0.008821815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99943763,0.000050957984,0.000068432055,0.00007545322,0.0000051056177,0.00000314967,0.000012279059,0.0000034563668,0.00034354764],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933285,0.00035831498,0.0000160198,0.00005098283,0.00014116269,0.00010072973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965544,0.0018716673,0.0005639713,0.00017379336,0.00026576244,0.00057051826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011333368,0.00015118674,0.00018255519,0.00069295435,0.0014189591,0.003635959,0.00038199866,0.0010860204,0.0021850304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008677713,0.00021857422,0.00027923382,0.00044234327,0.001816618,0.0016964516,0.0016930221,0.0011954949,0.00021846485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001178069,0.0002764415,0.19148123,0.0001590372,0.0002131797,0.0012394828,0.7451295,0.00021382065,0.01573798,0.011726182,0.001399757,0.031245358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071362774,0.0003421368,0.4756109,0.0000849033,0.00021892235,0.001034248,0.50172466,0.0007301191,0.0029086953,0.009299128,0.007906684,0.000068226786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002631624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003843639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003635959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057738443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002790768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0073096156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002479604","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2005.11.001","title":"The effect of self-affirmation on perception of racism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Perception; Psychology; White (mutation); Ethnic group; Social psychology; Social perception; Prejudice (legal term); Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.018544145140271626,"score_gpt":0.41830124515515926,"score_spread":0.3997571000148876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002479604","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976362,0.000028503835,0.000048241694,0.00010672463,0.0000214889,0.0000072054067,0.000017728453,0.00000326295,0.002130528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926764,0.000026909413,0.00010962901,0.00004961052,0.000018879027,0.000012305033,0.00001808857,0.0000069878324,0.0004900569],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870586,0.0006644106,0.00005457737,0.00018801854,0.00024570414,0.00014150164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94684434,0.042029064,0.004387197,0.0018864007,0.0014896332,0.0033634282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024507234,0.00032692848,0.00041729867,0.00031502487,0.0007731856,0.001474951,0.0004592317,0.0010072667,0.008436036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022857377,0.0003508028,0.0002605382,0.00019346057,0.0011341431,0.0008910661,0.0010048092,0.0017031578,0.00040471848],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.08154359,0.023616455,0.5373741,0.0006015248,0.00070209906,0.00092161214,0.032468975,0.001373276,0.2554338,0.0053287367,0.0021301392,0.058505777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040564028,0.0027625435,0.98539263,0.000026609006,0.000114235816,0.00015404922,0.0029359988,0.0008478326,0.005758124,0.00083301944,0.00072816544,0.00004118176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022488174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022290258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008436036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044732672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052510086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02822131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2002575548","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.008","title":"Looking back with regret: Visual perspective in memory images differentially affects regret for actions and inactions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Memory Processes and Influences","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Regret; Perspective (graphical); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Meaning (existential); Observer (physics); Cognitive psychology; Action (physics); Computer science; History","score_opus":0.08938999900841262,"score_gpt":0.4075958705156165,"score_spread":0.3182058715072039,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2002575548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919624,0.00021174274,0.0005810746,0.00030834725,0.00009139935,0.000011868605,0.00007115724,0.000014776677,0.0067472276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99714845,0.00015047689,0.00065156526,0.00017025691,0.00003773409,0.000012691712,0.00006866829,0.00003510589,0.00172519],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994981,0.00010844968,0.000022469612,0.000102115904,0.00015909481,0.00010968213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721897,0.0010172416,0.0010437949,0.00022200926,0.00014000305,0.00035795724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055581675,0.00046821067,0.0003815026,0.0003553114,0.00038601208,0.0017678585,0.00034067413,0.0010092715,0.008308602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008376523,0.0003764085,0.00038163265,0.0001993722,0.00058331655,0.0010291184,0.00069003657,0.0011389506,0.00032871804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036715526,0.00417439,0.13265264,0.0005814686,0.00077746226,0.0020207372,0.00824184,0.0025941012,0.7045383,0.0063473266,0.0050471597,0.096309036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047256597,0.0032238513,0.94852006,0.000113262126,0.00051551,0.0014092025,0.0027945978,0.0046036453,0.028908815,0.0071953572,0.0021302605,0.00011285801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009665816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015181552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008308602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042933205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041134295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027795017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004199652","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.10.006","title":"On the determinants of implicit evaluations: When the present weighs more than the past","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Implicit attitude; Social psychology; Cognition; Negative affectivity; Semantic differential; Implicit-association test; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Personality","score_opus":0.07515324511601966,"score_gpt":0.47540049789284716,"score_spread":0.4002472527768275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004199652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833497,0.00035406812,0.0032621038,0.0013020476,0.00006803425,0.000018367384,0.00008330423,0.000013209674,0.011549334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882954,0.00008259,0.00045967227,0.00006679291,0.00004569983,0.0000050427957,0.00004412936,0.000019552912,0.00044703417],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845684,0.0006489895,0.000089727975,0.00030125113,0.00031262398,0.00019051599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9266005,0.056815963,0.007010541,0.0040628803,0.003682531,0.0018276171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00599849,0.00040848448,0.0005254218,0.00089523854,0.0007015747,0.004437484,0.0006304093,0.0020859216,0.0074016894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06341167,0.0004120309,0.00038862493,0.0009378921,0.0017620962,0.005548291,0.0013255166,0.002944671,0.0006950075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0066124247,0.0022277255,0.71374637,0.0004461867,0.0007206162,0.00056146755,0.0066388776,0.007338903,0.020720419,0.08789576,0.0031849341,0.14990647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021129615,0.00057516166,0.83111185,0.00017773856,0.0005041967,0.00032675057,0.0017961817,0.026755821,0.0036365988,0.13316104,0.0015847092,0.00015865805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002222455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003270429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074016894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055463344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005229204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03172344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007717783","doi":"10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00525-5","title":"The effects of near wins and near losses on self-perceived personal luck and subsequent gambling behavior","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":116,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Luck; Psychology; Roulette; Social psychology; Game of chance; Counterfactual conditional; Perception; Coin flipping; Counterfactual thinking","score_opus":0.06055914026704855,"score_gpt":0.41747544531216696,"score_spread":0.3569163050451184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007717783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99946755,0.00003565033,0.000021900407,0.000024245377,0.00000657794,0.0000032603466,0.000018162049,0.0000019200545,0.00042082017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999411,0.00003208157,0.00010705152,0.000020410476,0.000007148419,0.000006774109,0.000036896938,0.0000018871772,0.00037678648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995627,0.0001630883,0.000037698475,0.000071396964,0.00009495996,0.00007017698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899178,0.0056648767,0.0012935048,0.00040761832,0.00022138924,0.002494856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012813666,0.00031812873,0.00042875393,0.0003279762,0.00048182652,0.0009119931,0.00030781233,0.0008329414,0.0031540692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008184914,0.00040196607,0.00032619748,0.00015884131,0.0008096706,0.0006919628,0.00060446793,0.001309219,0.000246633],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07102998,0.01885545,0.8616964,0.00011047907,0.0007445524,0.0004772125,0.0016923734,0.0018015824,0.019929143,0.0011034373,0.00042374796,0.022135615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016548601,0.003590929,0.9932492,0.000006086726,0.00010268717,0.0002009984,0.00046112464,0.0011307271,0.00052807457,0.00039630735,0.00014630338,0.000022057331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016305705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048622093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031540692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029874494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000323824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010551393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010589301","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.09.009","title":"When self-disclosure goes awry: Negative consequences of revealing personal failures for lower self-esteem individuals","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Stressor; Self-disclosure; Self-esteem; Social psychology; Distress; Competence (human resources); Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04988983559816498,"score_gpt":0.42520111031499924,"score_spread":0.37531127471683423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010589301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981997,0.000038475722,0.00011311654,0.00038952456,0.000016397235,0.0000036334282,0.000018814031,0.0000051461047,0.0012150578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961436,0.00003312266,0.00009593806,0.00008224186,0.000007365826,0.0000034417671,0.000012240889,0.000002460119,0.00014869172],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988921,0.0005259556,0.000084684834,0.00006549794,0.00024936209,0.0001824626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98091424,0.009026174,0.005238546,0.0020997073,0.0007476858,0.0019736052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027078127,0.00022847443,0.00030587253,0.00046921105,0.0012486314,0.002058288,0.00030686034,0.0014995314,0.003026561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033403546,0.00034698902,0.00033176882,0.0002854371,0.0010890041,0.0015989366,0.0016082558,0.0019518287,0.00033217296],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032193167,0.0029082496,0.8799366,0.00015967482,0.0003093621,0.0038893041,0.03061311,0.0011262735,0.013646573,0.005464103,0.0028821025,0.05584526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014484568,0.0012063667,0.9291641,0.000120677556,0.00041289162,0.00555947,0.040190503,0.003408971,0.004809054,0.013121982,0.0017435945,0.000117545635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053629355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00115372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003026561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022719472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038803727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014320433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011770984","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2000.1436","title":"Addressing Discrepancies between Values and Behavior: The Motivating Effect of Reasons","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":163,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Helpfulness; Social psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Value (mathematics); Feeling; Salient; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.18514174573605513,"score_gpt":0.4953939467555255,"score_spread":0.3102522010194704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011770984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814973,0.0000804658,0.0015235128,0.00096002023,0.000046444246,0.000024352397,0.000015885686,0.000013979831,0.015838023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981013,0.00003432845,0.001208214,0.00013694042,0.000010809984,0.000020135514,0.000010056026,0.00001643905,0.00046177593],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964349,0.0024071161,0.00008736681,0.00027149214,0.00062004715,0.00017902468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94741386,0.040776465,0.004715364,0.0036779966,0.0015623237,0.0018540289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052378527,0.0003573336,0.00033623562,0.0003322227,0.00095096417,0.0020255481,0.00057994906,0.0016088869,0.003860832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045286305,0.0004105199,0.00027844904,0.000249935,0.0022691868,0.0019102577,0.0015250136,0.0025304854,0.00015975557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010293887,0.011348046,0.35458025,0.00096328324,0.0005308993,0.001309156,0.08713893,0.0050063133,0.11124242,0.21527876,0.004242078,0.19806601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010719025,0.0031246138,0.74813163,0.00029955927,0.0007120026,0.00079821853,0.03598125,0.01732799,0.028765272,0.14973623,0.013791653,0.00025976912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006310624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010120485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052378527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058129965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012200797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027700722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012958538","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.005","title":"An implicit measure of anti-gay attitudes: Prospective associations with emotion regulation strategies and psychological distress","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Racial and Ethnic Identity Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Psychology; Rumination; Distress; Lesbian; Association (psychology); Clinical psychology; Implicit attitude; Mood; Stressor; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Cognition","score_opus":0.08540626382759992,"score_gpt":0.48359362113106075,"score_spread":0.39818735730346083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012958538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99853086,0.000052392737,0.00014017335,0.000040013834,0.000009900567,0.00003241847,0.00009721688,0.0000037189038,0.0010933434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99692315,0.00013156711,0.0007509523,0.00008215658,0.000022005004,0.00008122785,0.00029016443,0.000007231155,0.0017115369],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993586,0.00020602648,0.00006588665,0.00010236782,0.00020006552,0.00006711397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99238855,0.0023721966,0.003090782,0.00083462504,0.0006323037,0.0006815354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012078276,0.00062105234,0.00038824463,0.0005243474,0.00065197994,0.0018572578,0.00048487447,0.001449718,0.0029217533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008094262,0.00046548454,0.00031274967,0.00048874057,0.000491426,0.0006341575,0.0007572619,0.0023793345,0.00056336354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00121943,0.00480637,0.97370607,0.00007690265,0.00020595235,0.00005280917,0.0013773614,0.00022943415,0.0076816194,0.00026869346,0.00019298746,0.01018242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004697124,0.0006783979,0.99639577,0.000009983812,0.00007286477,0.000099840065,0.0004665514,0.0006745596,0.0011781977,0.00015374759,0.00020439504,0.000018651644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016706622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004981984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029217533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032327065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031844186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009774268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013327778","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.002","title":"At the first sign of trouble or through thick and thin? When nonconformity is and is not disengagement from a group","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Nonconformity; Disengagement theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Norm (philosophy); Harm; Developmental psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.12137013762571122,"score_gpt":0.3952981577508896,"score_spread":0.27392802012517836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013327778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89162123,0.0005659935,0.00229958,0.04499605,0.0008198936,0.00003649858,0.00005939963,0.00008823038,0.059513103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965783,0.000074853815,0.0004238855,0.00131377,0.00008165309,0.00001482454,0.000024074654,0.000029922472,0.0014587799],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955363,0.0012758829,0.0002074175,0.0005788813,0.0010160862,0.0013853448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98515654,0.0029355865,0.00411654,0.0016078355,0.0015414561,0.004642138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046876012,0.00025339398,0.00063137256,0.0009789673,0.004622301,0.0067985845,0.0011760119,0.0034089554,0.0072037224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03672181,0.00048648467,0.00037412607,0.0007399015,0.00881175,0.007867646,0.004016133,0.0077553717,0.00078874605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021145314,0.0009707684,0.43042624,0.00024275771,0.0002309373,0.014168754,0.24337028,0.00037033536,0.010891159,0.121200316,0.03866855,0.13734537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017471041,0.00037880163,0.2578463,0.0005270467,0.000110498695,0.009002024,0.47245497,0.0014100022,0.003448954,0.21783894,0.036519248,0.00028858136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057271584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00788071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072037224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015250978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022294703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024790704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014067722","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1506","title":"Loving the One You Hurt: Positive Effects of Recounting a Transgression against an Intimate Partner","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Marine transgression; Psychology; Social psychology; Intimate partner; Control (management); Mechanism (biology); Developmental psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Domestic violence; Poison control; Epistemology","score_opus":0.043960419142608856,"score_gpt":0.4326559793626814,"score_spread":0.38869556022007257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014067722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99663854,0.0001301325,0.000033409,0.00039526564,0.0000959149,0.000026934587,0.000053622352,0.000012672405,0.0026134397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969073,0.00031963392,0.00027922128,0.00033750993,0.000093223745,0.000069140195,0.000084746265,0.000026259531,0.0018830808],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991912,0.0004187822,0.000034871584,0.0001219179,0.000120088305,0.000113147726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815057,0.012173552,0.0017852712,0.0012839251,0.00033361337,0.0029180492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00115723,0.00085250044,0.0008614164,0.00035632413,0.0015833005,0.0020413548,0.0012957791,0.0026482604,0.013917364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023497645,0.0011023592,0.00041455572,0.0003699361,0.0020161155,0.0012981286,0.0016584645,0.004164351,0.0008306112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2423565,0.13125235,0.15629531,0.0030485475,0.0029747463,0.010877253,0.055973697,0.003025284,0.22866845,0.007109303,0.01308544,0.14533307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010433931,0.04230618,0.8798339,0.0003040018,0.0024545675,0.003603328,0.032981165,0.003137012,0.010801703,0.00709579,0.006690413,0.0003580548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025634018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053712386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013917364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044010504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082464714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0465582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2017278929","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.07.007","title":"On the belief in God: Towards an understanding of the emotional substrates of compensatory control","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":184,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Control (management); Anxiety; Belief system; Epistemology","score_opus":0.12895611729284998,"score_gpt":0.41606456369613565,"score_spread":0.2871084464032857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2017278929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84683514,0.0010169441,0.05011276,0.0066767056,0.00020863044,0.00011917734,0.0001862107,0.00007099268,0.0947734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99336773,0.00031468127,0.004931129,0.00024437223,0.000048997044,0.000051997606,0.00004055847,0.000023271497,0.0009771865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990313,0.00034826342,0.00004179326,0.00017630644,0.00023440912,0.00016800077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99465656,0.0032861012,0.00060044124,0.00075777504,0.00044138808,0.0002577306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032762168,0.00040564087,0.00039625642,0.0007475206,0.0004844264,0.0033798057,0.00093919813,0.0012318498,0.0048961923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010734514,0.00038677786,0.00030195777,0.00052394246,0.0047210907,0.0030396886,0.0013831536,0.0014735135,0.00021862944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016118399,0.0006130914,0.036325693,0.0004247659,0.00019037166,0.0011980707,0.01643744,0.0060544694,0.0571979,0.75445026,0.0016858894,0.123810224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030916935,0.00039312977,0.15842056,0.00027548595,0.0001736696,0.00077839027,0.005476663,0.024002861,0.011150182,0.7934889,0.0053587216,0.00017225418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001021731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00076626684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048961923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005496756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008807229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017326474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018582012","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.09.012","title":"Your mistakes are mine: Self-other overlap predicts neural response to observed errors","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ohio Federal Research Network","keywords":"Psychology; Error-related negativity; Stroop effect; Anterior cingulate cortex; Negativity effect; Task (project management); Neural correlates of consciousness; Cognitive psychology; Degree (music); Social psychology; Neural activity; Developmental psychology; Cognition; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.2357049282930043,"score_gpt":0.4458876021687439,"score_spread":0.2101826738757396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018582012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983021,0.000021582175,0.00034123418,0.00008056341,0.000014177253,0.000010228178,0.000082792205,0.000008099323,0.0011392972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897707,0.000029463594,0.00026447655,0.000052434545,0.000012329783,0.000013318941,0.00013602912,0.000023074645,0.00049177883],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995326,0.000083061466,0.00002983499,0.00013811594,0.00013914754,0.000077347264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899132,0.0061353827,0.0021402757,0.0005626947,0.0003243442,0.00092394016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000778267,0.00029592833,0.00048900035,0.00035453384,0.00024354846,0.0011946856,0.00036131698,0.0010526623,0.0047812313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013200194,0.00048583632,0.00021907537,0.0002744047,0.0005465577,0.00084663625,0.0010433611,0.0011169704,0.00046462097],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014575384,0.0026554344,0.59799725,0.00030049507,0.00051813474,0.0008265676,0.0027758523,0.004726087,0.32937166,0.0023413214,0.001678186,0.04223368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008779743,0.00033789792,0.9836572,0.000017121358,0.00005249869,0.00030542372,0.00035788366,0.008061958,0.0049904943,0.0019606133,0.00015449394,0.00001663355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010080204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014896175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047812313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002269977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024526796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015994787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019406163","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.009","title":"You can’t always get what you want: The motivational effect of need on risk-sensitive decision-making","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":131,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Risk-seeking; Social psychology; Irrational number; Risk aversion (psychology); Expected utility hypothesis; Economics","score_opus":0.05784026192484497,"score_gpt":0.44220946422586266,"score_spread":0.3843692023010177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019406163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896555,0.00018662859,0.00081453845,0.0012450713,0.000027697753,0.00001711275,0.000024767918,0.000008804162,0.008019947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981515,0.000112278256,0.0010181468,0.00022429123,0.00002148946,0.000017820113,0.000016241127,0.00001768157,0.00042054127],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884725,0.00062040734,0.00003709799,0.000115859,0.00026978183,0.00010955259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98251003,0.01281883,0.0014002227,0.00085991446,0.00050490955,0.0019060686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029025795,0.00025207183,0.0003774648,0.0005041723,0.0006382825,0.0019319105,0.00042023294,0.0012416265,0.0066868053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019153606,0.00049252284,0.0002954688,0.00030509869,0.0014045734,0.0016673917,0.0010929295,0.0022043588,0.00028405205],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030161807,0.02853135,0.35555512,0.0018551195,0.001187893,0.0019629118,0.02551439,0.009502286,0.17007598,0.10929931,0.009205863,0.257148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012697364,0.003249217,0.82755464,0.00016365512,0.000763392,0.0009211841,0.0044048335,0.019860683,0.0069448166,0.1306023,0.004007276,0.00025824568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009758789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014784442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066868053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040456903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006271815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022369623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019451974","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.004","title":"The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":124,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Harm; Hostility; Social psychology; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Test (biology); Salient; Developmental psychology; Social group","score_opus":0.025144728190153308,"score_gpt":0.42052516169046045,"score_spread":0.39538043350030716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019451974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9952474,0.00004900131,0.00047992927,0.00043575728,0.00009001914,0.000034307093,0.000028043338,0.00007391227,0.0035615503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716824,0.000059512513,0.0011268918,0.00015838584,0.00004015597,0.000036890964,0.00003160312,0.00003733483,0.0013409395],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992046,0.0003668716,0.00006461988,0.00007427021,0.00021401687,0.00007557914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9765678,0.017675735,0.0014169265,0.001782599,0.0007559436,0.0018011375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010420419,0.00046800362,0.00029155568,0.00033682497,0.0012832761,0.0009350579,0.0006233476,0.0020584008,0.010896097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026026802,0.00034837652,0.00022517983,0.0001665878,0.00079877145,0.00053956604,0.0010052563,0.0021234835,0.00094562036],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.063939735,0.020203741,0.044296708,0.0009102598,0.00020314808,0.0034200482,0.013291886,0.0026666638,0.7224442,0.008457713,0.0053496924,0.11481615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063354485,0.08346238,0.42365482,0.0006732714,0.0014159491,0.007847224,0.014062318,0.020989524,0.39684552,0.021119531,0.02307805,0.00051595597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011452297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017655251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010896097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031361048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096890365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03645104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019638363","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.05.019","title":"Attachment avoidance and feelings of connection in social interaction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Belongingness; Feeling; Social psychology; Pride; Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.035739876770748656,"score_gpt":0.4736083244474877,"score_spread":0.43786844767673905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019638363","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99357176,0.00013297447,0.000173485,0.00017124895,0.000016803979,0.000010786449,0.000010616659,0.0000025919887,0.005909884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991122,0.000082267754,0.0000918107,0.000051686297,0.000009164901,0.000014057611,0.000015786596,0.0000030519977,0.00062007556],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985996,0.0006887175,0.000054447526,0.00010598908,0.00040273118,0.00014856188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922233,0.0039052835,0.0015311363,0.0003837084,0.00038833547,0.0015682701],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023801678,0.0004351012,0.0004915267,0.00097391394,0.0028455674,0.0036392633,0.00049573724,0.0011901848,0.0036200304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010869145,0.0005755002,0.00033210556,0.0006244822,0.0026808237,0.0014974987,0.0019223181,0.0037173494,0.00022504033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030525723,0.0054330877,0.6866855,0.0003059331,0.00062424934,0.0019165098,0.21322443,0.0009221509,0.021758938,0.019970696,0.0013921541,0.044713844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013838575,0.00073043146,0.9349756,0.000046441957,0.00015638463,0.0009062279,0.053720962,0.0009205889,0.0005295148,0.0059713465,0.0018209252,0.00008322985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016955885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004240576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036392633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084908993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006073039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0125876665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2020152110","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2000.1444","title":"Black Experimenters and the Intellectual Test Performance of White Participants: The Tables Are Turned","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":54,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social dominance orientation; Moderation; Dominance (genetics); Social psychology; Test (biology); Race (biology); Developmental psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.059923290713064375,"score_gpt":0.3893152302020323,"score_spread":0.32939193948896794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2020152110","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9603047,0.0004268779,0.0024092314,0.003541618,0.0004177057,0.000040407565,0.0005599844,0.00007298689,0.032226488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113524,0.00008150374,0.0008278957,0.00044002937,0.00006615518,0.00003619222,0.00014034277,0.000034139448,0.007238548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979493,0.001010851,0.00011976086,0.00030022862,0.00038641805,0.00023339833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641667,0.02160266,0.005999346,0.0028371203,0.0026929555,0.002701095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038891085,0.00038832458,0.00035030028,0.00087436015,0.0011907445,0.0017210706,0.00050638634,0.0012706352,0.019398646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039708547,0.00031940755,0.00024103669,0.00037868842,0.0015265362,0.0016452953,0.0015720213,0.0013472326,0.0020855404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024354411,0.002062417,0.6015739,0.00023698091,0.00038582154,0.0014729509,0.028317822,0.0011053514,0.029116869,0.041446794,0.0498053,0.22012135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054128334,0.003288394,0.88430804,0.00025245963,0.0002509493,0.0011817868,0.02524389,0.003316098,0.016603548,0.045398574,0.019363334,0.00025157398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031629945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037395465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019398646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000330692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005364093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064894974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029386813","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.016","title":"Thanks for asking: Self-affirming questions reduce backlash when stigmatized targets confront prejudice","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Backlash; Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Perception; Self-affirmation; Social perception","score_opus":0.04328763604152922,"score_gpt":0.43295707389239324,"score_spread":0.389669437850864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029386813","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87319237,0.00056576735,0.024276353,0.04093924,0.0071043056,0.00088597793,0.0007614168,0.0035947356,0.048679743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9145231,0.0004176015,0.032148298,0.011476001,0.00092045486,0.0017859692,0.00044287063,0.0005637763,0.037721924],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980044,0.0011055673,0.00013614846,0.00019734136,0.00036054105,0.00019613195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780036,0.012238582,0.0019659568,0.0024451718,0.0030675821,0.0022790118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046932753,0.0006469696,0.00067790423,0.0003547083,0.0015015368,0.0011221226,0.0007878112,0.0025811682,0.056428704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053426236,0.0003664744,0.00043506967,0.0001332532,0.0007035449,0.0022722052,0.0015644357,0.0022480409,0.01132107],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0074096094,0.009211916,0.04213525,0.0012436477,0.00023278921,0.00087795773,0.037428487,0.000892631,0.08557719,0.006235281,0.25088677,0.5578684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061251237,0.017259505,0.29152933,0.002273239,0.001824641,0.0042774486,0.06751441,0.01293158,0.11991248,0.051223613,0.4241249,0.0010037009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057289755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008849714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056428704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022931291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007993432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1887728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032527315","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.001","title":"I like it, because I like myself: Associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit evaluations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":258,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive dissonance; Psychology; Associative property; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Endowment effect; Object (grammar); Cognition; Anchoring; Implicit attitude; Mechanism (biology); Association (psychology); Ingroups and outgroups; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07080506364724026,"score_gpt":0.45498146876533013,"score_spread":0.38417640511808987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032527315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99745005,0.00002691057,0.00022316295,0.00005068805,0.00001154969,0.0000057932107,0.000016357691,0.0000046544696,0.002210948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990171,0.000027504031,0.00026719048,0.00002297811,0.0000105117715,0.0000066426783,0.00004072674,0.0000118985345,0.00059538113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990025,0.0003306489,0.00006228269,0.00018402979,0.0003146117,0.000105938445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975513,0.014572768,0.0040695295,0.0029122226,0.0014668271,0.0014655156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002712962,0.00023199854,0.00036507176,0.00041297387,0.00036766825,0.0017096455,0.000530163,0.0007414819,0.0058970787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033531446,0.00038568745,0.00016737689,0.00047616923,0.0008443418,0.0017731122,0.0009263177,0.001697551,0.0005910255],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025925966,0.012047715,0.61467,0.00042734595,0.00046142202,0.00054453436,0.018187907,0.004185826,0.122666694,0.017765772,0.0019613102,0.18115556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031608494,0.0012412412,0.966142,0.000032011467,0.00012037895,0.00027033626,0.0015077542,0.008136945,0.0075582196,0.013698775,0.00089953846,0.0000767549],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010279259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013501664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058970787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028280876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003547453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019727707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032887269","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1494","title":"Committing Altruism under the Cloak of Self-Interest: The Exchange Fiction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Donation; Prosocial behavior; Altruism (biology); Social psychology; Psychology; Product (mathematics); Compassion; Social exchange theory; Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13329243406849026,"score_gpt":0.4162112716150567,"score_spread":0.28291883754656644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032887269","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28457057,0.0030928268,0.028883236,0.35632715,0.0026664261,0.000086982225,0.00007849875,0.000063284235,0.32423103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97429895,0.00040767965,0.001682419,0.01132323,0.001035463,0.000033197757,0.000008721534,0.000033598884,0.0111767305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980222,0.0012489364,0.000051233153,0.00020997641,0.00025351284,0.00021408148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98356795,0.012481107,0.0011256691,0.0015494389,0.00065771816,0.0006179645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004199607,0.00028296758,0.0005778973,0.0003536995,0.0022814656,0.0020867437,0.0009262273,0.0067315125,0.0062285727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024734523,0.00017953054,0.00033560407,0.0002887069,0.009244128,0.0038272988,0.0020733124,0.0086611565,0.000632077],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024623817,0.00010361188,0.0013295372,0.00006320501,0.00004463573,0.0003702704,0.0013880453,0.0007425446,0.0005097121,0.9697506,0.012833421,0.01261825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013598599,0.00007415893,0.0015838831,0.000050081297,0.000033419103,0.00033642,0.0005607398,0.0030335158,0.0005661568,0.96841305,0.025183566,0.000029110877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091590785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006592281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067315125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008984926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006595316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022209942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033027375","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.003","title":"When threat matters: Self-regulation, threat salience, and stereotyping","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Norsk Sykepleierforbund; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Psychology; Mortality salience; Social psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Terrorism; Affect (linguistics); Stereotype threat; Terror management theory; Cognitive psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.06978188319844027,"score_gpt":0.40954382144713286,"score_spread":0.3397619382486926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033027375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928235,0.0001394922,0.00044034256,0.0004027716,0.000024755833,0.000012092307,0.00003304631,0.000005475254,0.006118494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993949,0.000040570107,0.00019820481,0.00011138946,0.000012572397,0.000008106241,0.000021323478,0.000008142253,0.00020469083],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986386,0.00048559107,0.000047273756,0.00022565569,0.00041034567,0.00019260313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923568,0.0034979908,0.0019102169,0.0007441347,0.00045999166,0.0010310697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028814496,0.00021601058,0.0003920401,0.0006251682,0.0006779259,0.002515172,0.00035689067,0.0011749566,0.002655829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014989573,0.0003087581,0.00022848728,0.00034585985,0.0013477126,0.0011637732,0.001053652,0.0015613508,0.00023404609],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034555183,0.0025892397,0.8245871,0.00022056865,0.00028363525,0.00060439645,0.020937586,0.0012129854,0.067371085,0.014537506,0.0017208114,0.062479492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004774102,0.00023899735,0.98207986,0.000036855254,0.000054738222,0.00016129369,0.0044906214,0.0016201603,0.0017510302,0.008816135,0.00066165417,0.000040970575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014583381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022723868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0028814496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037036504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006035595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015238762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033196190","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.03.001","title":"Not always the best medicine: Why frequent smiling can reduce wellbeing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Happiness; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Well-being; Subjective well-being; Developmental psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.14044060590787702,"score_gpt":0.38133259061263125,"score_spread":0.24089198470475423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033196190","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7508767,0.016186485,0.0027320622,0.18626617,0.0031675403,0.000055684675,0.00028845735,0.0001120711,0.040314816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98670757,0.0021401306,0.0015100208,0.0071229767,0.00036606126,0.000022036667,0.000039312265,0.000024353734,0.0020674535],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999041,0.0005581462,0.000027062675,0.00010001295,0.00014090708,0.00013291439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971488,0.0016454695,0.00039244507,0.00016369518,0.00030725356,0.00034236623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011345914,0.0002966359,0.0003103524,0.0002509876,0.0008244653,0.0011947908,0.0003866391,0.0027183276,0.0075486014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009775494,0.00022068083,0.00046889158,0.0001819024,0.0014493805,0.0008596477,0.00073759723,0.0024422759,0.0007294216],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007895086,0.004570613,0.22732913,0.0031682637,0.0024247225,0.005891582,0.013675736,0.0015822438,0.047770716,0.04565685,0.1323322,0.5077029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008341535,0.0030365398,0.7461011,0.0031718393,0.0011921596,0.005139956,0.026900588,0.003933116,0.008638159,0.12488011,0.07585952,0.0003128153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016877835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037815592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075486014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047678806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006405428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02525258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033708859","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.05.004","title":"Kicking the habit: Effects of nonstereotypic association training and correction processes on hiring decisions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":105,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Training (meteorology); Association (psychology); Task (project management); Habit; Social psychology; Cognition; Function (biology); Applied psychology; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04752118897731331,"score_gpt":0.4002919166513031,"score_spread":0.35277072767398976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033708859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994242,0.000025036954,0.000058258982,0.00003648053,0.000026111593,0.000010219092,0.000015524523,0.000006442218,0.0003977814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99780947,0.000056301327,0.000258971,0.00008349532,0.0000320616,0.000039897852,0.00006112424,0.000029956153,0.0016285816],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992055,0.0002301472,0.000074318115,0.00019771158,0.00011172185,0.00018055126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793794,0.012817615,0.0027658034,0.0016051068,0.00041526573,0.0030167163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015016105,0.0005492281,0.0009601598,0.0002804328,0.00057505333,0.0013858817,0.00083585375,0.0011208316,0.007869619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018052267,0.0006900642,0.00021287071,0.0003017457,0.0010449707,0.0010158317,0.00090910494,0.0023277136,0.00063005363],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2861357,0.09231296,0.13289267,0.00045647885,0.00062675285,0.0008693075,0.004697563,0.0041926806,0.35999995,0.0016750685,0.0019097948,0.11423117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004489494,0.032326106,0.91001487,0.00008289469,0.00052386086,0.0003792831,0.0015584604,0.012882111,0.03128501,0.00449773,0.0017854975,0.00017467308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002676205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048097386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007869619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000518509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001090392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026326537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036418579","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.002","title":"Beyond the double-jeopardy hypothesis: Assessing emotion on the faces of multiply-categorizable targets of prejudice","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":168,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Hostility; Anger; Happiness; Perception; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Categorization; Social perception; Face perception; Emotion perception; Facial expression; Developmental psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.0847735874539589,"score_gpt":0.41315217033565244,"score_spread":0.3283785828816935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036418579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947724,0.00008771318,0.002186417,0.00022152539,0.000043507476,0.000015142498,0.000012615765,0.0000050453314,0.0026556142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978264,0.00004820219,0.0014792199,0.00015244255,0.000028076161,0.00001854647,0.000011084938,0.0000057826323,0.0004302992],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992884,0.00028872042,0.000028248003,0.00010428519,0.00021745246,0.00007297845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802667,0.0008710709,0.00029152274,0.00037232347,0.00023760012,0.0002008255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001475102,0.00040322085,0.000325891,0.00030982762,0.0005320776,0.0009116234,0.0003624399,0.0008362628,0.0015174976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007865811,0.00016304628,0.00017188708,0.00011138596,0.000785225,0.0009542415,0.0010460139,0.0012504857,0.00013474868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005148988,0.001255752,0.2762666,0.00029325712,0.0003822322,0.00085296266,0.0074841958,0.0017026787,0.53812397,0.010290849,0.0018843845,0.15631416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021004371,0.0024745858,0.89774776,0.0001388733,0.00021755068,0.00232655,0.008025243,0.011392136,0.051013947,0.024333458,0.0020132626,0.000106593085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004090842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086561433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0015174976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014880768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023819285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0078011155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2036610118","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.030","title":"Social cues for creativity: The impact of behavioral mimicry on convergent and divergent thinking","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mimicry; Psychology; Divergent thinking; Improvisation; Convergent thinking; Creativity; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Social relation; Creative thinking; Ecology","score_opus":0.12014455396969041,"score_gpt":0.5175137084388569,"score_spread":0.3973691544691665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2036610118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937285,0.0001511302,0.0007161295,0.00019278942,0.00004688403,0.000016325921,0.00003992383,0.00001599466,0.0050923037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976578,0.0001081696,0.001448023,0.00007905378,0.000021546208,0.000039023664,0.000035320594,0.000047908874,0.00056329207],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879646,0.00045657478,0.00006554427,0.00017355294,0.0003945192,0.00011348019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987565,0.008053189,0.0016028545,0.001096815,0.00040167125,0.0012804659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011864698,0.000502335,0.00045895446,0.00042441709,0.0004717595,0.0019091788,0.00059485284,0.0011515865,0.0061702984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029011548,0.0004972291,0.00029128036,0.00022655897,0.00082992687,0.0011274273,0.002176696,0.0014671813,0.00027593313],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02591194,0.0039806864,0.06956422,0.0011760339,0.00041291118,0.0015581382,0.004756041,0.0053748717,0.71548295,0.01169132,0.0019555867,0.1581353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027066693,0.007547373,0.8030423,0.00036741607,0.00095496076,0.0030944713,0.003703082,0.039740678,0.0881696,0.045487076,0.004805956,0.0003804216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047861767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00063170656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061702984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037754865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073305535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020641744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038317200","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.016","title":"Examining the consequences of exposure to racism for the executive functioning of Black students","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Society for Personality and Social Psychology","keywords":"Racism; Psychology; Centrality; Social psychology; Stroop effect; Active listening; Context (archaeology); Developmental psychology; Cognition; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.09249835974223712,"score_gpt":0.4510824779283103,"score_spread":0.35858411818607316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038317200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997701,0.000008252782,0.000004198087,0.000024835004,0.0000019750225,0.0000013784395,0.0000057752177,2.9406945e-7,0.00018305995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995454,0.000022800301,0.000014959692,0.000019691448,0.0000037377197,0.000004533004,0.000022621443,6.68923e-7,0.000365646],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997186,0.00007150172,0.000013437159,0.000039567673,0.00004908003,0.00010776143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851006,0.0002654397,0.00042669385,0.00010192695,0.00015107564,0.0005447207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006000975,0.00034765276,0.00024214739,0.0003530325,0.0006994958,0.0009236333,0.00024755343,0.00056852767,0.0024837765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002170938,0.00022150126,0.0002882278,0.00023913126,0.0004762779,0.0003173272,0.00047163336,0.001177602,0.0002787412],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024399296,0.0069873533,0.95236045,0.00003898654,0.00017526578,0.00035255836,0.0041041034,0.00020730721,0.016251167,0.00028631237,0.00035136176,0.016445206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002730786,0.0006663409,0.9967591,0.0000074305995,0.000035715922,0.00003737411,0.0014131307,0.000095519266,0.0007022113,0.00008806506,0.00016282391,0.0000050006242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010503017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023726178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010503017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005680169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00076351815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020883799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2041832921","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.03.002","title":"Having a “senior moment”: Induced aging phenomenology, subjective age, and susceptibility to ageist stereotypes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Aging and Gerontology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Valence (chemistry); Fluency; Stereotype (UML); Social psychology","score_opus":0.06318254433027805,"score_gpt":0.4503465325991842,"score_spread":0.3871639882689062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2041832921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971935,0.000048159578,0.00028257084,0.0000416384,0.000008681071,0.000009575635,0.00001736644,0.0000031969794,0.002395384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966586,0.00002091448,0.00008720045,0.000020756928,0.000002978198,0.000004457543,0.000014437895,0.000002143637,0.00018129179],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997801,0.000092964445,0.000014860331,0.000029074867,0.000056043275,0.000026904914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988784,0.00046819495,0.00026784957,0.00016654361,0.00007921529,0.00013990195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009979412,0.00012443033,0.00013269656,0.00036213372,0.00056201953,0.00083772914,0.00015639013,0.00030519612,0.0014989768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037020927,0.000095904856,0.00013748319,0.00018156866,0.00083276076,0.0006150541,0.0008326327,0.000497501,0.00007324066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036633252,0.0014056633,0.3765628,0.00041648906,0.00012917662,0.0017177473,0.46460682,0.00056080444,0.095425464,0.020245135,0.0012692112,0.033997476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010674903,0.0019353888,0.79883975,0.00008536169,0.00010480469,0.0027921824,0.16523401,0.0012101991,0.0086144,0.012142835,0.008825807,0.00010854657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004515964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007388625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0014989768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028236877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022921912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0052776933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043379128","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.010","title":"Cautious to a fault: Self-protection and the trajectory of marital satisfaction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Feeling; Distancing; Mediation; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science","score_opus":0.030571993544888,"score_gpt":0.4180803313518844,"score_spread":0.3875083378069964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043379128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826952,0.0005781797,0.00041502723,0.014165041,0.00009038018,0.000010452282,0.00010435644,0.000011921567,0.0019292877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903667,0.00015492634,0.00017871069,0.00019428298,0.000013869433,0.0000037606173,0.000029613531,0.000004322438,0.00038392536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994518,0.00022703623,0.000027399316,0.00006326528,0.00012392507,0.00010660405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560285,0.0015586832,0.00087491673,0.00035852854,0.00060607813,0.0009988794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023037954,0.000084038824,0.0002481771,0.00055391283,0.0020355685,0.002740013,0.0005798148,0.001776007,0.00443233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018350324,0.00023573339,0.00028481512,0.0006208867,0.0018508265,0.002870532,0.0011408406,0.0035290665,0.0003158058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003244077,0.00021179362,0.90073705,0.000042820735,0.00008481458,0.00064054684,0.03272581,0.00049281574,0.0010438616,0.010533037,0.0031086644,0.050054353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009574999,0.00011416015,0.95254505,0.00008307975,0.000022666953,0.00050105836,0.03115787,0.0009807553,0.00029013946,0.009661714,0.0045934604,0.000040623734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015492356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019692453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015492356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076913607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020964534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030804336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050109217","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.001","title":"Becoming irreplaceable: How comparisons to the partner’s alternatives differentially affect low and high self-esteem people","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences","keywords":"Feeling; Psychology; Social psychology; Affect (linguistics); Self-esteem; Perception; Contrast (vision); Romance","score_opus":0.037651623503493596,"score_gpt":0.43305480405247837,"score_spread":0.39540318054898477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050109217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981041,0.000023344799,0.0000374872,0.000067116904,0.0000065187105,0.0000017794565,0.000004991019,8.1181565e-7,0.0017538641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967396,0.000013894636,0.000025644773,0.000029726987,0.000001982821,0.0000018476425,0.000007139534,0.0000014479771,0.00024430038],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951804,0.00019253041,0.000015424843,0.000056601893,0.000137337,0.000080072066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978842,0.0009621689,0.00040914956,0.00012824501,0.00019919356,0.000417135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010121226,0.00015550196,0.0002163451,0.0004488133,0.0007059981,0.0026033649,0.00025617197,0.0008322055,0.003635952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078339325,0.00020126383,0.00018550342,0.00022275443,0.001502656,0.0012035599,0.00093456043,0.0011362745,0.0002501028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005055699,0.0028767688,0.7016086,0.00018335159,0.0005138879,0.001787223,0.16040382,0.0008702077,0.050352324,0.012295712,0.0020622795,0.06199019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111319656,0.0005579056,0.91970783,0.000033048054,0.00013852211,0.00059737975,0.0661034,0.0010885689,0.0023647803,0.007800661,0.0014462142,0.00005032935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017828642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026771622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003635952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028993547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020410599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01216346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051454148","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.12.007","title":"Superman to the rescue: Simulating physical invulnerability attenuates exclusion-related interpersonal biases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Superman; Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Interpersonal relationship","score_opus":0.06864048976226621,"score_gpt":0.43598992116101226,"score_spread":0.36734943139874604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051454148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980883,0.000007650822,0.00067095336,0.000049621915,0.00001618481,0.000011064524,0.000020907799,0.000013000532,0.001122279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99886775,0.000015043498,0.0005285153,0.00005185077,0.000004836414,0.000027839313,0.00003525622,0.000016809563,0.00045203074],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975294,0.00008325371,0.000011832687,0.000041663578,0.000053293097,0.000057065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986135,0.0007323136,0.00015463844,0.00019777767,0.00003541025,0.00026647167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035175704,0.00037721387,0.00032244573,0.00015073002,0.00024883292,0.00060544786,0.00052147545,0.0005273703,0.005396724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004662827,0.00017387474,0.0001536831,0.00007861731,0.00058137334,0.0003804731,0.0009928936,0.00090086204,0.00026871255],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03738985,0.013167092,0.042929646,0.00052568904,0.00034192516,0.00077150564,0.005267369,0.043319605,0.8061497,0.008306772,0.002303306,0.039527446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055024815,0.04492598,0.3399937,0.00029246084,0.00091842806,0.0010266737,0.0058710794,0.40849623,0.14713389,0.03788047,0.0076943957,0.00026426394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010529587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010960575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005396724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018409922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045717775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01805383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052948791","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1484","title":"Inducing Hypocrisy to Reduce Prejudicial Responses among Aversive Racists","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":174,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Hypocrisy; Psychology; Prejudice (legal term); Feeling; Social psychology; Implicit attitude; Consciousness","score_opus":0.09322066532637219,"score_gpt":0.4414164362104998,"score_spread":0.3481957708841276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052948791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983108,0.00006537111,0.00020403617,0.00031139023,0.000041220785,0.000022487997,0.000022241058,0.0000291364,0.0009933328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974349,0.00013722356,0.00060551905,0.00028591198,0.00004562836,0.000042669824,0.000035780657,0.00001973856,0.0013925916],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963415,0.00010975355,0.00001580402,0.00006364006,0.000059932267,0.00011669564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987453,0.0002774406,0.00024105512,0.00013818573,0.0000761388,0.00052178465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003086154,0.00031750093,0.00051441794,0.00025686363,0.0006364963,0.00057498313,0.00027950632,0.0007131202,0.0071137054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001663336,0.00026451587,0.00016284428,0.00013857124,0.0008053132,0.00026428144,0.00048513222,0.002403236,0.0004883992],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.027010657,0.023519086,0.0058469824,0.00031154696,0.00014798852,0.00013208119,0.0010416505,0.00046774876,0.897216,0.0020792321,0.0017068989,0.04052005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0146066295,0.09926511,0.18002942,0.00030247253,0.0007882878,0.0015222077,0.003994094,0.01330619,0.6671496,0.0051092403,0.013714902,0.00021177575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017818495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033510078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071137054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033495808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007907452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02379769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056356367","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2007.02.006","title":"Evidence that blatant versus subtle stereotype threat cues impact performance through dual processes","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Stereotype threat; Social psychology; Task (project management); Stereotype (UML); Dual (grammatical number); Athletes; Impression formation; Perception; Social perception; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.2171078799406738,"score_gpt":0.5026864226599272,"score_spread":0.2855785427192534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056356367","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98517644,0.00019831462,0.00065763155,0.00044041008,0.00007314899,0.000028119215,0.00015708608,0.000026033567,0.013242831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99393845,0.00015025318,0.0012337534,0.00024463693,0.000045929773,0.00004270059,0.00016797175,0.00004827033,0.004127912],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986462,0.00025875945,0.00006276794,0.0003280473,0.000546329,0.00015800896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880304,0.0058162953,0.0026471575,0.0014701565,0.00053394074,0.0015021237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013857444,0.000675182,0.00045386123,0.0004306349,0.00044334607,0.001975713,0.00069902465,0.0018663406,0.016045092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014033761,0.0005955296,0.00018464525,0.000233181,0.001138386,0.0013811745,0.0017430269,0.0017143479,0.002142866],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05327682,0.009333161,0.10091246,0.0013295478,0.00044711586,0.000338168,0.0054108193,0.0011673857,0.69886357,0.008747298,0.003098016,0.117075644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017866908,0.0069964677,0.93352646,0.00022975511,0.00030063666,0.00040432948,0.0013905363,0.0040579955,0.033047374,0.014379457,0.0037466134,0.00013374352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009912995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001508435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016045092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029282708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007279404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053676188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2057786510","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.002","title":"Unprejudiced and self-focused: When intergroup contact is experienced as being about the ingroup rather than the outgroup","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Prejudice (legal term); Ingroups and outgroups; Psychology; Social psychology; Feeling; In-group favoritism; Developmental psychology; Social identity theory; Social group","score_opus":0.03079745012225975,"score_gpt":0.39721012202572936,"score_spread":0.3664126719034696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2057786510","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848792,0.00011191882,0.0010095673,0.00032693485,0.000089773,0.000024021372,0.0000290097,0.000016098713,0.013513402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99890244,0.000042714226,0.00037455565,0.00018248607,0.00002956542,0.000015747486,0.000042644828,0.000017384062,0.00039248454],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768376,0.0008280918,0.00009488701,0.00031300192,0.0007988905,0.00028136466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98446435,0.0071740104,0.003930505,0.0012520122,0.0016980087,0.001481074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021863885,0.00027737752,0.0003023236,0.00088008156,0.0013367579,0.0030593812,0.0005594555,0.0017828251,0.0020369068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03276274,0.00036404008,0.00018913078,0.00045491697,0.0017506467,0.0021773477,0.0020686963,0.002365647,0.00020425514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004517972,0.0011327594,0.3265241,0.00061311835,0.00034743483,0.0029321667,0.4104765,0.00067613,0.15515912,0.018421827,0.004920285,0.074278645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008807983,0.00054011936,0.85764056,0.00022898059,0.00015608734,0.0026125344,0.11482563,0.0026531115,0.006702828,0.009308845,0.0050999164,0.00014331932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011450017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024230857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030593812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005538397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006397942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011562884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058152888","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.010","title":"Experiencing Alien-Nation: Effects of a simulation intervention on attitudes toward homosexuals","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Empathy; Prejudice (legal term); Social psychology; Situational ethics; Perspective (graphical); Empathic concern; Ideology; Attitude change; Intervention (counseling); Perspective-taking; Lesbian; Control (management); Politics","score_opus":0.07696249370002453,"score_gpt":0.4843116586144304,"score_spread":0.40734916491440587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058152888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991092,0.000010471416,0.00007519098,0.000066682966,0.000021702637,0.00007972834,0.000018787514,0.000023082099,0.0005951712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981949,0.00005378451,0.00055814354,0.000058420857,0.000017759165,0.00025453916,0.00005696368,0.000003987071,0.0008015138],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958485,0.00016014195,0.000031499254,0.000057372858,0.000041436982,0.00012467931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997445,0.0010097551,0.00019130758,0.00014973177,0.00007435865,0.0011299286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007795744,0.0007041453,0.0006630218,0.00040192754,0.0011695159,0.00070381514,0.0007659818,0.001209096,0.009592758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002811709,0.0003716029,0.0004896015,0.00019991431,0.00059128186,0.00043485613,0.0010224637,0.0015689011,0.0005781642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.05108277,0.81973433,0.020371089,0.00043331488,0.00027615365,0.0006380307,0.010293303,0.0022952345,0.022938093,0.00080522953,0.0014334186,0.069699004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07180198,0.58505064,0.25052196,0.0004580499,0.0014954879,0.00071028987,0.019954104,0.018546565,0.039420623,0.0022040782,0.009438218,0.00039793146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019827783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027243788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009592758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004601576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011383698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03209102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063675916","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.01.004","title":"Evidence for the DTA hypothesis II: Threatening self-esteem increases death-thought accessibility","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":126,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Self-esteem; Path analysis (statistics); Personality; Task (project management); Test (biology); Social psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.22339787917901185,"score_gpt":0.4504310449963443,"score_spread":0.22703316581733243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063675916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794343,0.00033153995,0.0015027833,0.0009927099,0.0000787813,0.000048984853,0.00041111535,0.000031279167,0.017168477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964456,0.00016600305,0.00064980646,0.00034862082,0.000082839535,0.000055645116,0.00028116125,0.00003127153,0.0019391249],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993881,0.00014219889,0.000041782318,0.00020712755,0.00014568269,0.000075002325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97011316,0.019826762,0.004906455,0.0026074527,0.00077344186,0.0017728304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015008415,0.0004075009,0.00040750203,0.00076638884,0.00038641374,0.0013099381,0.000753741,0.0009866068,0.03507666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015641153,0.00039446072,0.00054407323,0.00037381434,0.0011135893,0.0012374064,0.0018010623,0.0015520835,0.0013895273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.037986144,0.009283408,0.6829296,0.0024200673,0.0012978022,0.0017537507,0.007271095,0.0009703816,0.14096814,0.0293679,0.0038174167,0.081934325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047818598,0.0011301943,0.9834632,0.000069339134,0.00020775087,0.00080119853,0.0008815214,0.00064492994,0.004317542,0.0064378264,0.001549661,0.000018679433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007841487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006259018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03507666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024340382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003435716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11734307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065831083","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.02.011","title":"Fostering relationship resilience: An intervention for low self-esteem individuals","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Psychological resilience; Self-esteem; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06447239959671427,"score_gpt":0.5011991610036638,"score_spread":0.43672676140694955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065831083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99595684,0.0001885802,0.00044554533,0.00080034044,0.00021421375,0.00060560193,0.00004089675,0.00010548733,0.0016424356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98941296,0.0006432165,0.0051642642,0.0003745989,0.000116241376,0.0015663423,0.00008470187,0.0000123181435,0.002625307],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997677,0.00005432211,0.000017775652,0.000044762284,0.000027751661,0.00008769774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920976,0.000105452855,0.000054664048,0.00003782732,0.000026074566,0.00056613825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005769622,0.0006944355,0.00072605634,0.00062022277,0.0020338527,0.00035973045,0.0006224233,0.0010325355,0.008523331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013463233,0.0002929201,0.00065666717,0.00032282405,0.00043359553,0.0004448099,0.0012250254,0.0015116703,0.00047931346],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036355034,0.4585612,0.01167028,0.001722861,0.00065953593,0.001663344,0.0047918493,0.0009951015,0.023630997,0.001503053,0.008540089,0.44990665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.14666492,0.32333544,0.4505449,0.0015788258,0.0044449246,0.0025254723,0.012062012,0.008999844,0.019212158,0.005614845,0.024691748,0.00032486624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017873743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00467279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008523331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004478923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015260217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028513432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067067182","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.001","title":"Negational racial identity and presidential voting preferences","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Voting; Social psychology; Identity (music); Psychology; Preference; Categorization; Social identity theory; Democracy; White (mutation); Race (biology); Presidential system; Presidential election; Political science; Social group; Gender studies; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.09854677034355243,"score_gpt":0.44904438825428944,"score_spread":0.350497617910737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067067182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944279,0.000027595568,0.00008968394,0.00021815479,0.000011267927,0.0000022190068,0.00002367094,0.000001285809,0.005198177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990132,0.000014728895,0.00005478286,0.000041306394,0.000011162063,0.0000021703004,0.000033801443,0.0000020127509,0.00082671863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936527,0.00034521736,0.000037495854,0.0000664065,0.00010514508,0.00008043529],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888853,0.0064001796,0.0025744617,0.00059781293,0.00068293157,0.00085929304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024745655,0.00014299905,0.0002140528,0.00032898205,0.0007279228,0.0018832943,0.00028551303,0.0008575329,0.0138213895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016127914,0.00017424866,0.00016854859,0.00019954257,0.0005606394,0.0009875774,0.0005675485,0.0009422505,0.0008276354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011943404,0.0030069642,0.9029398,0.000091962786,0.00018871823,0.00077061134,0.0059164213,0.00069464406,0.017249776,0.026732584,0.0017208927,0.028744074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030274477,0.00062764937,0.96213436,0.000028461334,0.00014635299,0.00095152954,0.006142872,0.0038730104,0.0024920092,0.020915583,0.0023259325,0.00005952144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008405581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019453714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0138213895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025448206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020787735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04623717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067926729","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.010","title":"System justifying functions of myths that exaggerate the emotional rewards of parenthood","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social Capital and Networks","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; System justification; Psychology; Legitimacy; Social psychology; Mythology; Economic Justice; Government (linguistics); Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.09626169222199953,"score_gpt":0.40365819937335407,"score_spread":0.3073965071513545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067926729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49121925,0.00046004148,0.13038936,0.0225279,0.00089125213,0.00015682852,0.00021374002,0.00039822992,0.35374343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98998123,0.000046054814,0.006743729,0.00041837862,0.00007279599,0.0000389825,0.000020836838,0.00004720384,0.0026306268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956577,0.0027046534,0.00016933377,0.0005027355,0.00070357317,0.00026193782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96985704,0.018450323,0.0040861443,0.0046772165,0.0022355241,0.0006937467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006441629,0.0003920743,0.00024644448,0.00086049957,0.0013222704,0.0028242294,0.0007403049,0.0021008153,0.011403976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04310016,0.0002650483,0.0002976876,0.00037775945,0.0051670177,0.0038434255,0.0024488694,0.0021796362,0.00062036526],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001982647,0.00006639313,0.005933808,0.00012385771,0.00004418718,0.00020968843,0.0068148137,0.0007068395,0.004879216,0.95489216,0.0031366965,0.02299412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008739578,0.0001364519,0.009580603,0.00009739343,0.00009634509,0.00051360874,0.0037247054,0.01053477,0.0045358874,0.95278066,0.017865393,0.00004678544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041332064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042775786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011403976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011217532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007116633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03815013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068538438","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.004","title":"Choice architecture in conflicts of interest: Defaults as physical and psychological barriers to (dis)honesty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Honesty; Default; Commission; Cheating; Choice architecture; Perspective (graphical); Law and economics; Economics; Social psychology; Business; Public relations; Actuarial science; Psychology; Public economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.2641639832645473,"score_gpt":0.4374538265067949,"score_spread":0.17328984324224755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068538438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9125526,0.000058478752,0.07019217,0.0012089707,0.000020246835,0.000036458343,0.00012243672,0.00012363931,0.015684864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433535,0.00001079616,0.0045486274,0.00003173171,0.0000066816406,0.000016359463,0.00003909694,0.000016224709,0.0009950651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979413,0.0007656104,0.00011598819,0.00048674765,0.0003993992,0.00029092596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845241,0.008440968,0.0018488313,0.002376999,0.0011384481,0.0016706559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004217516,0.00018360802,0.0006565452,0.00067785155,0.0008376964,0.0037267562,0.001104987,0.0013165866,0.008454512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021979537,0.0006473881,0.000818617,0.00042662493,0.0029117202,0.005598785,0.0021139323,0.0022807862,0.0004893745],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087966095,0.00036016342,0.05825904,0.00010515906,0.00012505191,0.0004401303,0.004469626,0.015925862,0.01283644,0.875103,0.001255832,0.030240113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007934355,0.000078689154,0.025903279,0.00001186138,0.000038347986,0.0001634444,0.00071374635,0.08097989,0.0009273029,0.89060116,0.0004651877,0.000037803246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016446742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018411209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008454512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011444406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008037194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02828312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069242578","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.07.003","title":"Implicit partner affect, relationship satisfaction, and the prediction of romantic breakup","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Feeling; Romance; Developmental psychology; Preference","score_opus":0.03430221518405012,"score_gpt":0.4326908132562323,"score_spread":0.3983885980721822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069242578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981102,0.00006517915,0.00012708432,0.00006014952,0.0000124740245,0.000013069051,0.000075457494,0.00000453595,0.001531929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990841,0.000059417453,0.00012239398,0.00002163023,0.000010722874,0.00002028922,0.00015266033,0.0000040730497,0.00052473386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991862,0.000398406,0.000056131634,0.00010065753,0.00015576529,0.00010280113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98376554,0.008042483,0.0038317326,0.001469661,0.0006037626,0.0022869217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026663393,0.00047214708,0.00056469144,0.0006300918,0.00067066844,0.0017365343,0.0006097325,0.0015349203,0.0068573933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02021239,0.00048702615,0.00038410272,0.00046140436,0.0007373611,0.0007584615,0.0011935362,0.0022520262,0.00079206494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017190818,0.0013013688,0.98620903,0.000026777592,0.00010294644,0.00010873394,0.00060729106,0.00040955303,0.0010658808,0.00038573303,0.00019438364,0.007869261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003447473,0.00034312552,0.9967057,0.00000872397,0.000041836258,0.00009338613,0.0002587667,0.0017048393,0.0002305726,0.00044530813,0.00012229665,0.000010989098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015956736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024779576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068573933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031195366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028433977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022940278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069412933","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.002","title":"Coping with a threatened group identity: Psychosocial and neuroendocrine responses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Coping (psychology); Stressor; Optimism; Social psychology; Psychosocial; Developmental psychology; Social identity theory; Clinical psychology; Social group; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.04599966747282679,"score_gpt":0.421443013567161,"score_spread":0.3754433460943342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069412933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99889404,0.00008704825,0.000061347164,0.00010918566,0.000028851033,0.000014359982,0.000014301747,0.0000020747043,0.0007888848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882907,0.00014103527,0.00010406363,0.00014592452,0.000031102096,0.00004157251,0.000024457217,0.0000017303668,0.000681032],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998723,0.000043680346,0.00000327958,0.00002484643,0.00002368124,0.00003204194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957556,0.00010728123,0.00006164457,0.000033119068,0.000020126985,0.00020227575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040121627,0.0002707062,0.00029822843,0.000163988,0.0004254275,0.0006471898,0.00015002469,0.00078485144,0.0031608606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001586379,0.00018526583,0.00012777721,0.00011697866,0.0005740391,0.00025520174,0.00039344333,0.0011193553,0.00022827956],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.034996234,0.019721372,0.346071,0.00047709324,0.00042936855,0.005012986,0.0125476355,0.0017588537,0.48900825,0.0025503167,0.0026682052,0.08475865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043104845,0.007984404,0.9768728,0.000038427905,0.00007775394,0.00096156844,0.0057451017,0.00081328105,0.004206366,0.0013336733,0.0014951226,0.000040452476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041273987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007618407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0031608606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001713131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024247407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010574162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070365994","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.003","title":"When size justifies: intergroup attitudes and subjective size judgments of “sacred space”","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Ingroups and outgroups; Psychology; Social psychology; Opposition (politics); Space (punctuation); Group cohesiveness; In-group favoritism; Group conflict; Social group; Social identity theory; Linguistics; Politics; Political science","score_opus":0.03060551614327758,"score_gpt":0.38975763937758817,"score_spread":0.3591521232343106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070365994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9657151,0.00018416734,0.0018261498,0.0010830363,0.00008532732,0.000013827312,0.00002819518,0.000012113743,0.031051993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999246,0.000019772702,0.00033375,0.00008869492,0.000021042873,0.0000048503452,0.000012928285,0.000009128773,0.00026386493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758804,0.0010099753,0.00011151738,0.00028471803,0.0007766425,0.00022901683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762716,0.0111096585,0.006413083,0.0016109409,0.002604944,0.0019898536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041582673,0.000311287,0.00022435968,0.000964,0.0010498696,0.0025381614,0.00043964677,0.0016196881,0.0057830233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036032703,0.00026745145,0.00025382923,0.00038768284,0.0031314876,0.0023675459,0.0015291476,0.001531601,0.00039320168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011006422,0.001554548,0.5077066,0.00073312316,0.0008951281,0.0012995625,0.08047375,0.0043522376,0.09572151,0.15797824,0.010285924,0.12799291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023592112,0.0012744729,0.8240715,0.00020508797,0.000245912,0.0010574955,0.05023868,0.006061591,0.008973085,0.09546309,0.011938663,0.00023447884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013495712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025294637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057830233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060531317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000330809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021991313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070533909","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.005","title":"The effects of priming legal concepts on perceived trust and competitiveness, self-interested attitudes, and competitive behavior","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Alberta; Western University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Social psychology","score_opus":0.04417526576879861,"score_gpt":0.37244088973777895,"score_spread":0.32826562396898035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070533909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969452,0.00008337338,0.00036129207,0.00017949066,0.000081250575,0.000069266694,0.000049460443,0.000014579961,0.0022160853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952485,0.00025758802,0.0018682942,0.00035975603,0.00009332941,0.00018143782,0.0001336655,0.00007818211,0.0017792179],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915504,0.00018941812,0.000061533254,0.0002580724,0.00019803747,0.00013777794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98716325,0.008618564,0.0018228301,0.0005556397,0.00034945938,0.0014902712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014890154,0.00091444247,0.0007104541,0.00027401673,0.00058888906,0.0021747488,0.0008382913,0.0014632577,0.011054068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016708119,0.00095341954,0.00029913968,0.0003287096,0.002043353,0.0017472809,0.0013131828,0.0037458672,0.0005647517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.11688081,0.037401326,0.02971923,0.0010254385,0.00027564992,0.0009436523,0.010890309,0.0008245829,0.7506493,0.017556384,0.0016457479,0.03218758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0217623,0.07053582,0.591448,0.00051131565,0.0026270682,0.0031084165,0.006023654,0.015690716,0.24326104,0.038225982,0.0062402007,0.0005654429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001948339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022314568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011054068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008799529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014703493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036979556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071188485","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2007.07.009","title":"Approaching math increases math=me and math=pleasant","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Math education; Test (biology); Mathematical anxiety; Representation (politics); Psychology; Field (mathematics); Mathematics education; Mathematics; Pure mathematics","score_opus":0.050177677452289064,"score_gpt":0.42198120814358847,"score_spread":0.3718035306912994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071188485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98870325,0.00018308652,0.00022591616,0.00043356544,0.00012715021,0.000029324225,0.00013876343,0.00008945904,0.010069448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873913,0.00034385035,0.0008505129,0.0005898544,0.00018284758,0.000098976874,0.00036335885,0.00008610125,0.010093153],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991357,0.00025368945,0.00004052587,0.00015586753,0.00018909824,0.00022517562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878714,0.004529287,0.0019565627,0.0007770572,0.00028905904,0.004576652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009135873,0.000643145,0.0008887533,0.0004235223,0.00075319456,0.0015786543,0.0003567866,0.0012378189,0.027660234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010087335,0.0007433128,0.0006986887,0.0002804237,0.00067530555,0.0010298461,0.002538194,0.003536755,0.0019893802],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.076763764,0.035361726,0.40601993,0.0010835867,0.0012334336,0.001192704,0.0037023586,0.002830047,0.3573567,0.0074659553,0.0107118115,0.096278004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000340336,0.0044527296,0.98168993,0.000032449625,0.0001677625,0.00014188493,0.001030401,0.00091700273,0.0074564596,0.001429771,0.0022918403,0.000049423503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012361753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033810667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027660234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046402588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006485877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092532635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071730069","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.008","title":"Will you value me and do I value you? The effect of phenotypic racial stereotypicality on organizational evaluations","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Social psychology; Psychology; Ingroups and outgroups; Social identity theory; Attractiveness; Diversity (politics); Value (mathematics); White (mutation); Identity (music); Ethnic group; Race (biology); Social group; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.04361326044705986,"score_gpt":0.43452287183164445,"score_spread":0.3909096113845846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071730069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985468,0.000018572115,0.00002344124,0.000071508424,0.000005093109,0.0000015778318,0.000014566913,0.0000012884644,0.0013171096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966955,0.000011452235,0.00003689353,0.000019573312,0.0000028610527,0.0000028430006,0.0000132222085,0.0000033115818,0.00024023167],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978655,0.0013670775,0.00005627931,0.00020987415,0.00032941852,0.00017192356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755018,0.014347112,0.0041900342,0.0020234697,0.0010071539,0.0029304957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023709915,0.00024946645,0.0003446269,0.00038742222,0.0007956408,0.0010722015,0.00041591364,0.00068110914,0.0055818623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021935621,0.00024062245,0.00029880248,0.00032054115,0.0011293853,0.0005206525,0.0010276238,0.0011290751,0.00028425874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006121492,0.0027809057,0.95012707,0.000042173604,0.00030673074,0.00045821126,0.0036338004,0.00057402096,0.015684236,0.0019258603,0.00072612544,0.017619355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025329906,0.00025006282,0.9976063,0.0000074746854,0.000028498223,0.00006994905,0.000831796,0.00025868628,0.00044622683,0.0003420477,0.0001243898,0.000009217654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002777008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006580791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055818623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004369042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018673182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074087539","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.06.001","title":"Does affluence impoverish the experience of parenting?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Psychology; Social psychology; Socioeconomic status; Developmental psychology; Compromise; Independence (probability theory); Sociology; Social science; Population","score_opus":0.03816629846390551,"score_gpt":0.410790949288562,"score_spread":0.3726246508246565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074087539","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954548,0.00033500884,0.00007214891,0.00072911126,0.000041314917,0.0000030952285,0.00008105284,0.0000029537973,0.0032805766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939966,0.00018021197,0.0000374817,0.00007413531,0.00002710551,0.0000013255986,0.000027513512,0.0000029469018,0.00024946427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993358,0.00030081038,0.00003255358,0.000080084894,0.0000753721,0.00017532664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971495,0.0009308256,0.00069632626,0.00028095744,0.00013698872,0.00080544065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010206379,0.00018373832,0.00030052953,0.00034580595,0.0008581505,0.0014689469,0.00025478916,0.0006112826,0.005501254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00553971,0.00019843927,0.00022885553,0.00047186227,0.0013032554,0.00055599347,0.000750398,0.0007254529,0.000320312],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039212094,0.0018096005,0.92048883,0.000114721646,0.00026946876,0.0010405104,0.009138581,0.00023369133,0.015402631,0.007352254,0.00091155677,0.039316997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000214282,0.00036973925,0.99374676,0.000013395174,0.000039019207,0.00023679451,0.001991223,0.00007674788,0.0005839748,0.0010903955,0.0018187771,0.000011667968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036303215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006165496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005501254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042245636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005228522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01840347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075359494","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.008","title":"The relational versus collective “We” and intergroup allocation: The role of nested group categorization","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Superordinate goals; Categorization; Ingroups and outgroups; Social psychology; Competition (biology); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Group (periodic table); Group decision-making; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04678840124720814,"score_gpt":0.38614846642158107,"score_spread":0.33936006517437295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075359494","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97251546,0.00015364938,0.0064869574,0.0008737479,0.000036353274,0.000026876434,0.000020612697,0.000012073088,0.019874277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982023,0.000025764431,0.0012106443,0.000046536443,0.000013173573,0.000011986693,0.000009962425,0.000012056604,0.00046747038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963741,0.0023128274,0.00007395163,0.0004978498,0.00048671514,0.00025443005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9801122,0.0131980395,0.002214559,0.0023051128,0.0007136225,0.0014563808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005708074,0.00021569095,0.00039878045,0.00054828974,0.0013500905,0.0035428081,0.000979697,0.0012104962,0.00747344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028544562,0.0002966167,0.00026377445,0.00041906085,0.0050239544,0.0052756732,0.002231546,0.0011855102,0.0003504782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039568353,0.0022808262,0.17981507,0.00038384457,0.0004308529,0.00038402874,0.05558544,0.005505689,0.045072824,0.5927159,0.002363064,0.11150555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038532948,0.0006133503,0.43745306,0.00011669614,0.00023989315,0.0003759744,0.018543983,0.027539333,0.003927054,0.5056615,0.0049644555,0.0001793216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017843015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029568048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00747344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006563371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081405713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030187488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2075860471","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.001","title":"An affirmed self and an open mind: Self-affirmation and sensitivity to argument strength","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":225,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Self-affirmation; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Objectivity (philosophy); Epistemology","score_opus":0.03882557613295064,"score_gpt":0.4389652204497618,"score_spread":0.40013964431681115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2075860471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611466,0.00021565039,0.0047108307,0.002015683,0.000059311722,0.00003423597,0.00004109359,0.000024511815,0.03175214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99857295,0.0000423653,0.00078076025,0.00017930806,0.00001486674,0.000018937899,0.000016063439,0.000013857087,0.00036075996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99345994,0.0033206134,0.00022848429,0.000860353,0.0017376228,0.00039299438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.884647,0.0860774,0.01534857,0.0069483966,0.0038535257,0.0031249868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085172,0.00026114398,0.00042761615,0.0014169309,0.0012119965,0.0049107946,0.0009835978,0.0026412609,0.004734308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.103883095,0.0006152997,0.00032722752,0.0007197469,0.004914648,0.0052856044,0.0036459037,0.0034223837,0.00030197823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004440827,0.002518784,0.3116332,0.00058578874,0.00054396346,0.0024849088,0.17760193,0.0041420204,0.057081927,0.3348269,0.0049826857,0.099157065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003908198,0.00058148627,0.47260603,0.00019899465,0.0003007929,0.0027532196,0.046025794,0.013841397,0.0114774825,0.44302502,0.008444491,0.0003544433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007030272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005692743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070048176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007470168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045043826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076249622","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2013.08.005","title":"How time flies: The effects of conversation characteristics and partner attractiveness on duration judgments in a social interaction","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Neuroscience and Music Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee","keywords":"Conversation; Psychology; Attractiveness; Social psychology; Perception; Duration (music); Dominance (genetics); Developmental psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.04874160552993516,"score_gpt":0.36506613364672114,"score_spread":0.31632452811678596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076249622","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976782,0.00007432846,0.00030875969,0.000039163675,0.000008921112,0.000007017289,0.00002741172,0.0000051555317,0.0018509884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989573,0.000036186382,0.00043618548,0.000029936233,0.000008318694,0.000011159842,0.000036038917,0.000014953499,0.00046987605],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992686,0.00028547522,0.00003660465,0.00014600769,0.00020084924,0.00006246681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922598,0.0053479816,0.0009910368,0.00025332146,0.00032348192,0.0008244047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009970237,0.00024153499,0.0002795316,0.0004124689,0.00051501475,0.0015232009,0.0003095147,0.0007289526,0.003058804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014649509,0.0003875306,0.00019497797,0.0001902168,0.00047006988,0.00075067265,0.00078294764,0.00077918783,0.00029034875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011100303,0.00065687293,0.18051496,0.00025789934,0.00031826462,0.0005591631,0.010313972,0.0010537135,0.76065415,0.0014069597,0.0006306545,0.03253308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004800548,0.00071877555,0.98339707,0.000019248606,0.00010918054,0.00035260178,0.001997433,0.002621464,0.009741225,0.0005197919,0.00042253203,0.000052696105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017987414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034558696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003058804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027886775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024324143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010232687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076721433","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2007.04.003","title":"Relationship-specific attachment, risk regulation, and communal norm adherence in close relationships","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Receipt; Ambivalence; Norm (philosophy); Distress; Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.07334013723001617,"score_gpt":0.45134991450124334,"score_spread":0.3780097772712272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076721433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99814916,0.000025331608,0.00021971313,0.000039898725,0.0000042581123,0.000009384502,0.0000090546855,0.000002258488,0.0015408456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995763,0.00001559701,0.00013198558,0.000015967948,0.0000026786417,0.00001194444,0.00001750092,0.0000017836455,0.00022626815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982743,0.0009589516,0.00008424593,0.00019735935,0.0003394606,0.0001455481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99029505,0.004200028,0.002237533,0.0013706145,0.00045505626,0.0014416608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029442976,0.0002154813,0.0003639596,0.0005049584,0.0010280963,0.0016092744,0.00037622143,0.0006842692,0.002013499],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01790058,0.00024912134,0.0002144209,0.0003374567,0.0010659844,0.00060086075,0.0012689148,0.0017929188,0.00013135806],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013519553,0.004930576,0.9177438,0.000067582456,0.00028939138,0.00028966196,0.02484569,0.0009766669,0.0099011455,0.0050649326,0.00042663902,0.034111902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022855342,0.00033392422,0.99404246,0.000009309099,0.00003476535,0.000116371244,0.0025588896,0.0009065033,0.00031523153,0.0014248751,0.00021814262,0.000016738077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019080471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033430469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029442976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039727314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003850978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015571058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2077110920","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.015","title":"“Why didn’t you just ask?” Underestimating the discomfort of help-seeking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":108,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Embarrassment; Psychology; Ask price; Social psychology; Seekers; Feeling; Egocentrism; Helping behavior; Position (finance)","score_opus":0.07645188989575512,"score_gpt":0.45930442407867683,"score_spread":0.3828525341829217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2077110920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809725,0.00040546368,0.0016682534,0.0029975474,0.00012042678,0.000028674393,0.00004575382,0.00002161651,0.013739709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980994,0.00012744122,0.0004967017,0.0008027363,0.000045968573,0.000019363877,0.000026178144,0.0000075545204,0.0003747258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995195,0.003492926,0.00018919025,0.0002591281,0.0006252291,0.0002385036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9762354,0.013711175,0.0055572535,0.0015735201,0.002151974,0.0007707121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006446199,0.000311477,0.00030564514,0.0006267946,0.0010785533,0.0014403742,0.0004546402,0.0017109482,0.0033038838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041210342,0.0003043175,0.00033993102,0.0003127893,0.0014611775,0.0013504995,0.001158233,0.0017668591,0.00035589075],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027836752,0.000839179,0.64376926,0.0010686525,0.00061379076,0.0017923512,0.187744,0.0008238421,0.04615305,0.011937443,0.012906644,0.08956822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000198531,0.001109486,0.84300643,0.0004479594,0.00044266836,0.0040924693,0.10884529,0.0038828654,0.00840107,0.009296423,0.0200592,0.00021757212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013204406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016533486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006446199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046943966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051716866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034091175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2078335469","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.008","title":"Inflating and deflating the self: Sustaining motivational concerns through self-evaluation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Psychology; Promotion (chess); Social psychology; Creativity; Political science","score_opus":0.13423152355459614,"score_gpt":0.5013606678514689,"score_spread":0.3671291442968728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2078335469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92180836,0.00023052537,0.06406228,0.0010652037,0.00013326995,0.00037155848,0.000035421257,0.00032367694,0.011969671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9725461,0.000066947236,0.025756555,0.00012600789,0.000017956487,0.00016812164,0.000024036275,0.0000365758,0.0012576572],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99425876,0.0035109392,0.00023235696,0.00030550756,0.0014705369,0.00022190168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755755,0.017395394,0.0018082007,0.0018939772,0.002576622,0.00075031223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012701224,0.00038092042,0.00033000074,0.00074960646,0.00045318808,0.0014997515,0.00041198474,0.00054693734,0.0017502884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045307267,0.00019289876,0.00032725342,0.0003018461,0.0011386713,0.0015335089,0.0011370563,0.001185679,0.00022560576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024329002,0.006563151,0.06350476,0.00038523704,0.0001230633,0.00006046142,0.013572648,0.0026678625,0.017741362,0.036895815,0.0022755044,0.85377717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015142065,0.020528609,0.48456672,0.0012564322,0.001101357,0.00062814803,0.016311478,0.18512563,0.11181954,0.1459073,0.0306335,0.000607001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070909376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009828672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012701224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057314255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014212264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067171335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079785116","doi":"10.1006/jesp.1999.1421","title":"Narcissism and Intrinsic Motivation: The Role of Goal Congruence","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Narcissism; Social psychology; Intrinsic motivation; Competence (human resources); Id, ego and super-ego; Congruence (geometry); Personality; Phenomenology (philosophy); Developmental psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029315799988224936,"score_gpt":0.3689914797855213,"score_spread":0.3396756797972964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079785116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9931317,0.00016457256,0.00039999658,0.00035372432,0.000011153428,0.000009712322,0.000015699392,0.0000040512864,0.005909455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994597,0.000049266175,0.00021144479,0.00002091653,0.000007802225,0.0000065084682,0.000014048574,0.0000045823194,0.00022583584],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998516,0.0008287494,0.00004962689,0.00015184395,0.00032679524,0.00012702993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98571986,0.008462886,0.0026520141,0.000935008,0.0005959968,0.001634284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024544916,0.00028775306,0.00047917024,0.0008449893,0.00065309595,0.0030187187,0.00052434567,0.0008055665,0.004105242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016938543,0.00030706255,0.00026538636,0.0006122578,0.0019466386,0.0012791296,0.0014949762,0.0019189523,0.0002260821],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032785444,0.0036608705,0.80448437,0.0002191533,0.00055105676,0.00090079784,0.010816525,0.0015964671,0.013233582,0.10042105,0.0009355848,0.059901983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033309252,0.00045514916,0.93479484,0.00004795949,0.00016107563,0.0005509461,0.002954769,0.004332965,0.00072321354,0.054835524,0.00075537444,0.000055047003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000886265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001376979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004105242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060006033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093915337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013733387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083958573","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.012","title":"To escape blame, don't be a hero—Be a victim","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University","keywords":"Blame; HERO; Wrongdoing; Psychology; Social psychology; Criminology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Literature","score_opus":0.06714932421784875,"score_gpt":0.4218266111363723,"score_spread":0.35467728691852357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083958573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7612241,0.002157229,0.0031993773,0.11459768,0.0033631923,0.00010054185,0.000037152415,0.000060266262,0.11526042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773769,0.00050683523,0.000910815,0.007320067,0.00018240603,0.000036386664,0.000007812607,0.000020868216,0.013637948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831367,0.0010739516,0.000025661144,0.00006034877,0.0002931147,0.00023319047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589336,0.0012432394,0.00044116715,0.00029140883,0.00047554515,0.0016552118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020947084,0.0002710838,0.00030928137,0.00039913662,0.0064951708,0.0035718342,0.0005364236,0.0017256367,0.0074461806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008407084,0.00019943606,0.00018083918,0.00013545412,0.0053040604,0.0037631516,0.0016030915,0.0058863233,0.0011692635],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085966894,0.0079946695,0.056111213,0.00045944034,0.00021768124,0.0032949026,0.32185,0.00023601271,0.0077224504,0.2325262,0.23503798,0.1336898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003180853,0.0017530754,0.03314946,0.0006024249,0.00011855844,0.00981643,0.62485695,0.00092175003,0.0029268025,0.058504708,0.26687986,0.00015181364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010495451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024825165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074461806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068696804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011209409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024909914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085130169","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.022","title":"It hurts when I do this (or you do that): Posture and pain tolerance","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Embodied cognition; Social psychology; Pain tolerance; Power (physics); Interpersonal communication; Interpersonal interaction; Social relation; Impression formation; Social perception; Cognitive psychology; Threshold of pain; Perception","score_opus":0.09441043168900835,"score_gpt":0.38216446346728966,"score_spread":0.2877540317782813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085130169","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997888,0.00019016284,0.00014433173,0.00011831308,0.000022952534,0.0000057848265,0.00001655555,0.0000040996824,0.0016098843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991875,0.00009471571,0.00012158595,0.000040792896,0.000012275706,0.000007636201,0.000016354741,0.0000042967235,0.0005147495],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997665,0.00008360302,0.000010686143,0.00003439927,0.00006715225,0.00003760834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848664,0.00060282426,0.00048498172,0.00010347742,0.00006985059,0.00025225052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005188064,0.00021068912,0.00021693319,0.00032133667,0.00026370832,0.0007672182,0.00016709066,0.00055315206,0.0037335132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004105749,0.00027856906,0.00012557869,0.00023562102,0.0005378582,0.00031461968,0.00041783924,0.00066513475,0.0002390932],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.016113047,0.0064337635,0.6110744,0.00028010242,0.00041584962,0.00085468224,0.009616967,0.00091913465,0.23223092,0.0034393275,0.0023291581,0.11629269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007110461,0.0010780538,0.9950901,0.000017277727,0.000053395765,0.00029426123,0.00085729733,0.00051435654,0.001057455,0.0007031789,0.0002481435,0.000015237164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012232524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022081723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037335132,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022538024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027248592,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012489855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2089462467","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.08.003","title":"Win–win: Female and male athletes from more gender equal nations perform better in international sports competitions","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Sports Analytics and Performance","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Athletes; Gender inequality; Gender equality; Psychology; Inequality; Social psychology; Population; Competition (biology); Product (mathematics); Demographic economics; Demography; Gender studies; Economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04568476828064698,"score_gpt":0.31401216771400947,"score_spread":0.2683273994333625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089462467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99744284,0.000051205952,0.000048269154,0.0004464174,0.000051028605,0.000005459999,0.000060118706,0.0000032910914,0.0018912789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99817,0.000029087874,0.00003973252,0.00024928022,0.000038192138,0.000007786186,0.000118223325,0.000004473866,0.0013433009],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994593,0.00014592613,0.000021159023,0.00009909249,0.00006742811,0.00020704298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967894,0.00067552447,0.0005882366,0.000114494724,0.00017054427,0.0016618699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011151624,0.00032680322,0.0004524073,0.0006144769,0.00089563266,0.0017307254,0.00035983714,0.0010111328,0.014615052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040730108,0.00028363583,0.00034139413,0.00032562827,0.00089087675,0.0013676155,0.0013078974,0.00090378255,0.0014499659],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.019213524,0.0049542533,0.90194637,0.0001329878,0.0006288459,0.00068584224,0.004340498,0.00079149526,0.00744745,0.003909388,0.013212381,0.04273686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024706242,0.0008219941,0.9886699,0.00002379374,0.000095786316,0.00013887564,0.0060349545,0.0007163887,0.00030429798,0.0015875811,0.001332971,0.000026377162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053851292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069302977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014615052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024790203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033639447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04889226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091681727","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.016","title":"When distance pays off: The role of construal level in spending predictions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Construal level theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Cognition; Self construal; Cognitive psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.1695426554617265,"score_gpt":0.45397871341699847,"score_spread":0.28443605795527194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091681727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836125,0.00010703446,0.002272003,0.0008101911,0.000020141484,0.000015502746,0.00014437427,0.000013437406,0.013004843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993493,0.000018354627,0.00021577522,0.000041258863,0.0000064774217,0.0000051520706,0.00009178802,0.000011267859,0.00026065216],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853206,0.00068507605,0.00006369745,0.00022823796,0.0002465465,0.00024446344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9644862,0.025988093,0.003168479,0.0024984211,0.0016640979,0.0021947497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003985021,0.00032039356,0.000514189,0.0007234177,0.000513932,0.0036880823,0.00066998036,0.0016590648,0.0066143936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03254042,0.0004106326,0.00041616586,0.00062936527,0.0014615782,0.0027661368,0.001555233,0.0031810966,0.00081714283],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023512698,0.0013005215,0.9129224,0.000092774004,0.0002554812,0.00018610117,0.0037973784,0.010598616,0.001772483,0.037543055,0.002451864,0.02672798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000122000376,0.0003290089,0.86837745,0.000066699766,0.0001363182,0.00012863879,0.003843983,0.046789553,0.0008883029,0.077696055,0.0015518701,0.000070174334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005037705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059588514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066143936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073015393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043673723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02212733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092100463","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.013","title":"A grotesque and dark beauty: How moral identity and mechanisms of moral disengagement influence cognitive and emotional reactions to war","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":421,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Moral disengagement; Psychology; Morality; Social psychology; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral authority; Moral psychology; Moral reasoning; Disengagement theory; Moral development; Punitive damages; Identity (music); Aesthetics; Law","score_opus":0.08961613516282774,"score_gpt":0.3556516683044142,"score_spread":0.26603553314158646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092100463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.983189,0.00016241719,0.0010834258,0.00066721544,0.00006202804,0.000011665455,0.00001812756,0.000008605464,0.014797628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982457,0.00007379733,0.00041307032,0.00018681938,0.000016347369,0.000009611479,0.0000106157295,0.000022004167,0.0010221142],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940205,0.00023542241,0.000011975706,0.00010746544,0.00014517849,0.00009780623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853873,0.00070100825,0.00025431934,0.00013444548,0.00008963997,0.00028178465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009442344,0.00026692133,0.00023715408,0.00028302506,0.0007393161,0.0032779037,0.0003233289,0.0011676574,0.0068112016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058281156,0.00037795937,0.00018302945,0.00017106302,0.0017265979,0.0013265231,0.0011271874,0.0017854967,0.00032564782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013628938,0.004366158,0.14828219,0.0006770117,0.00058929285,0.002077119,0.08090562,0.0042115063,0.5028285,0.1206699,0.006389323,0.115374535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005941458,0.0011018051,0.8624453,0.00014907714,0.00033207805,0.0012211403,0.021141721,0.007919617,0.01598872,0.07759512,0.011344545,0.00016667864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011358459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020226885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068112016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038158498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048093978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022785723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2092737483","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2014.05.010","title":"Formation, representation, and activation of contextualized attitudes","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Universiteit Gent","keywords":"Psychology; Attitude; Social psychology; Attitude change; Valence (chemistry); Context (archaeology); Representation (politics); Cognitive psychology; Impression formation; Context effect; Cognition; Object (grammar); Social perception; Perception; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06958428706536002,"score_gpt":0.462017454774641,"score_spread":0.392433167709281,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2092737483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922218,0.00010481467,0.0024617878,0.00010340453,0.000023835764,0.000011964705,0.00003577865,0.000020742948,0.00501582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823904,0.0000491524,0.00090870017,0.000022619775,0.000008632362,0.000012436008,0.000047968293,0.000014972361,0.00069651497],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927956,0.00023520351,0.000020012403,0.0002088634,0.00013472265,0.00012170435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99862707,0.00043871292,0.0002659031,0.0002951267,0.00017180343,0.00020138985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081255083,0.00014455426,0.00018614979,0.00024136416,0.0004087495,0.0017380102,0.00022360368,0.00046241024,0.0026031234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003424593,0.00025876172,0.0001764476,0.00019793682,0.00057690556,0.00067349983,0.0010214759,0.0009985075,0.00024587344],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025429667,0.00067272305,0.06164791,0.00019149855,0.0001323997,0.00025252678,0.01374338,0.0011843409,0.787126,0.03119651,0.0010482728,0.100261554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021736963,0.0016223106,0.749142,0.00018921151,0.00026735367,0.0006338605,0.007662479,0.012444312,0.18382248,0.03347896,0.010414075,0.00010556939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090010616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00086868636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026031234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037088938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004694748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008708298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094327211","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2006.03.002","title":"Testing sociometer theory: Self-esteem and the importance of acceptance for social decision-making","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":147,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Mediation; Social acceptance; Join (topology); Social comparison theory; Affect (linguistics); Self-esteem; Group decision-making; Self-acceptance","score_opus":0.033168391329598895,"score_gpt":0.402916695604399,"score_spread":0.3697483042748001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094327211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956376,0.0000228252,0.0006169535,0.00021071413,0.000040864426,0.00007540305,0.00007071244,0.000006685276,0.0033183703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980343,0.00001861092,0.0008102821,0.00006281155,0.000025633834,0.0002545203,0.00008722642,0.000009287927,0.0006972669],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99567527,0.0026079796,0.00021428273,0.0005416115,0.00069705787,0.0002638232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8353678,0.14001276,0.009019799,0.00860525,0.0024435278,0.004550903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009494449,0.00087964855,0.0006273734,0.00096843165,0.0009302611,0.002045035,0.0013525345,0.0013669566,0.013385694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06163862,0.00041585695,0.0009176282,0.00046271915,0.0034560075,0.0026375228,0.0022065644,0.0032672817,0.0008781847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017745635,0.034555055,0.8279772,0.0002693587,0.0007077792,0.00048508617,0.0137699805,0.0025931075,0.0068101105,0.03999502,0.0015408422,0.053550754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003667007,0.02033657,0.88780993,0.000076336946,0.0006083185,0.00052870484,0.009924458,0.033279315,0.0060611162,0.034834653,0.0027230748,0.00015060758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016179674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090922276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013385694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008553283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011782808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050212085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094864682","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.007","title":"The impact of a relational mindset on information distortion","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Mindset; Distortion (music); Priming (agriculture); Task (project management); Psychology; Process (computing); Heuristics; Domain (mathematical analysis); Social psychology; Construal level theory; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14764099069581146,"score_gpt":0.5240087019768399,"score_spread":0.3763677112810284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094864682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98652357,0.00014463994,0.002003535,0.00060852966,0.0000307832,0.00003999142,0.000045037294,0.000019766967,0.010584281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998569,0.000047631485,0.0009294424,0.00007215024,0.00001248545,0.000010280285,0.000019836603,0.0000102000495,0.00032894354],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99667585,0.0013193027,0.0001777702,0.00038474647,0.0012096169,0.00023269826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93942505,0.044132933,0.005715037,0.005533494,0.0019134152,0.003280177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039610188,0.00030077834,0.00034439898,0.00053434767,0.00090811064,0.0023926345,0.0007007258,0.000631365,0.0074301623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049902875,0.000336467,0.00042285884,0.0003589997,0.0014595566,0.00165093,0.0018339823,0.001753489,0.00029156066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026293753,0.015135495,0.4938975,0.0009977274,0.0013670083,0.002006625,0.02417868,0.009387017,0.1366624,0.0662332,0.0015767749,0.22226392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002213374,0.0068888157,0.87603617,0.00022110245,0.0014223049,0.0025325757,0.008638175,0.020074736,0.02059851,0.056615375,0.0045548882,0.00020396379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014564188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014420418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074301623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010412604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011278985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024856389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2095482486","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.06.005","title":"Culture, self, and the emergence of reactance: Is there a “universal” freedom?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":117,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Reactance; Collectivism; Interdependence; Social psychology; Psychology; Individualism; Priming (agriculture); Context (archaeology); Cognition; Social environment; Cross-cultural; Sociology","score_opus":0.05815612408891186,"score_gpt":0.4159354939478982,"score_spread":0.35777936985898634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2095482486","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9669677,0.00034841636,0.0043741376,0.001115943,0.00004646796,0.00001529451,0.00003690559,0.000034207234,0.027060913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99901795,0.00006481715,0.00051339646,0.00007322561,0.000008091431,0.0000069874063,0.000011677111,0.000015934407,0.00028779573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985678,0.0007027801,0.00007039133,0.00023642508,0.00023756443,0.00018498643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909785,0.005189479,0.0013260547,0.0014713658,0.00041483474,0.0006197697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029838318,0.0001937916,0.00036215843,0.0005861472,0.00058356515,0.0031590478,0.00057901954,0.0008554437,0.0045753038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012543868,0.00040667385,0.00043091286,0.00033738624,0.0058871103,0.0029814735,0.0015977345,0.0016973588,0.00021228718],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016052511,0.0008557421,0.24970208,0.00046024827,0.00040734053,0.00094918517,0.07497673,0.0029739877,0.04717323,0.49102262,0.0016344738,0.12823914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002135632,0.00065962144,0.5325326,0.00030454586,0.0002806154,0.0013968868,0.03437051,0.007391768,0.015011308,0.3964493,0.011041883,0.00034747343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007696075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051047344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045753038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042382436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005075354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01578021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096123100","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.10.001","title":"On the cued activation of situational motivation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; McGill University; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Situational ethics; Cued speech; Task (project management); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Tone (literature); Intrinsic motivation; Goal pursuit","score_opus":0.13561162534802196,"score_gpt":0.4799943856168901,"score_spread":0.34438276026886816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096123100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98832977,0.00030978885,0.0009904465,0.00020057746,0.000072025156,0.000028900828,0.00007767245,0.000018570374,0.009972285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99812263,0.00023145684,0.0006564911,0.00010032931,0.000023311282,0.00003285995,0.000044803077,0.00002693634,0.000761095],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996711,0.00012485034,0.000010779573,0.0000656729,0.000079478086,0.000048177404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985014,0.0010141243,0.0001425647,0.00014271641,0.00005589702,0.00014322689],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053712405,0.00031625596,0.0002672251,0.0002993551,0.00024186613,0.0007137899,0.00031262863,0.00039881104,0.0058332514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041050003,0.0002337602,0.00012838947,0.00019110394,0.0004560035,0.0003674121,0.0007312469,0.00073139596,0.00025672797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.058664806,0.009325254,0.041525852,0.0009764151,0.0003444924,0.0005873766,0.0041530505,0.003127477,0.54709315,0.049033612,0.004531445,0.2806371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029279687,0.009471419,0.83049965,0.0005413502,0.0006836381,0.000746783,0.0017075222,0.022108342,0.07467115,0.04534883,0.011108278,0.0001850152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008077522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011968189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058332514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029902477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005182067,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019514143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102424700","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.11.002","title":"We are, therefore they aren’t: Ingroup construal as a standard of comparison for outgroup judgments","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Outgroup; Ingroups and outgroups; Psychology; Construal level theory; Social psychology; In-group favoritism; Trait; Social identity theory; Social group","score_opus":0.07478763889354875,"score_gpt":0.46284985170020715,"score_spread":0.3880622128066584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102424700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84792495,0.0017481722,0.04835144,0.028154364,0.0031946027,0.00021761323,0.00028415347,0.00030344728,0.06982117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887594,0.00011176374,0.0078553725,0.0013908518,0.00023745807,0.00009847653,0.00009592947,0.00015684127,0.0012938315],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98707956,0.0071834265,0.00061324233,0.0015914346,0.0030983356,0.0004339634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9498329,0.021007696,0.0055811433,0.012150157,0.008297311,0.0031307498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02677408,0.00038232363,0.0008214614,0.0013201375,0.003373658,0.004071305,0.00154668,0.0019874705,0.007518597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13903907,0.0005892501,0.00050811603,0.00084437075,0.0066219894,0.014221509,0.003910956,0.0042577717,0.0012419791],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008254421,0.0014572663,0.10787243,0.000691618,0.0012071704,0.0003581459,0.06321354,0.0017309946,0.027240977,0.3647399,0.042906597,0.3803269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055893185,0.001338318,0.21428773,0.00046212805,0.00044701286,0.0006214095,0.026733266,0.010911055,0.013392411,0.6927359,0.038135808,0.0003760756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016621066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018926951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02677408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000932796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093579275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14159656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115908828","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.005","title":"Understanding patterns of attitude change: When implicit measures show change, but explicit measures do not","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Implicit attitude; Attitude; Implicit-association test; Social psychology; Valence (chemistry); Attitude change; Cognitive psychology; Implicit personality theory; Object (grammar); Computer science","score_opus":0.4590227538096953,"score_gpt":0.44320760524699826,"score_spread":0.015815148562697057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115908828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821577,0.00051093486,0.009542758,0.0005793831,0.000060422524,0.00004778899,0.00027412607,0.00006378605,0.0067631314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971999,0.00010145903,0.0020660122,0.00012053029,0.000024513896,0.000035528323,0.00016317159,0.000022336468,0.00026661847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979127,0.00074160437,0.0002040663,0.00055056147,0.0004462513,0.00014484012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97490203,0.0123462835,0.0065313824,0.0036941064,0.0019650792,0.00056101294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052760784,0.00034535181,0.0004888661,0.0011099793,0.00035255557,0.0025583692,0.00039946358,0.0009512305,0.0017801615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0433919,0.00028022807,0.00034299135,0.0009901111,0.0008283045,0.0045545804,0.0008607391,0.0014403118,0.00032116025],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085659995,0.00045427214,0.84179825,0.000377846,0.0005858179,0.00005263228,0.0071495506,0.00066759164,0.013504395,0.0024893878,0.00095850055,0.13110508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020889267,0.00023058067,0.9837397,0.00008114864,0.00011274617,0.00010854623,0.0015892072,0.0035227234,0.0030641379,0.006624044,0.000867847,0.000038511153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018593868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024510708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052760784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027843151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034919614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02790296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2118749154","doi":"10.1006/jesp.1999.1412","title":"An Experimental Test of the Role of Alcohol in Relationship Conflict","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Feeling; Perception; Test (biology); Romance; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.046205109700711726,"score_gpt":0.4578146597701034,"score_spread":0.41160955006939165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2118749154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965204,0.000039689825,0.00024191839,0.00024600636,0.000060410253,0.000079818914,0.00008252041,0.000007898395,0.0027213925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99401325,0.00011400894,0.0011995152,0.00027763378,0.00005371823,0.0003325238,0.00013891126,0.000018922266,0.0038515395],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895287,0.00042949978,0.000076972916,0.00021555454,0.00021303409,0.0001121254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817737,0.01180981,0.0016609445,0.0022992692,0.00040961025,0.0020466815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017534731,0.0008490324,0.00055603404,0.00050898956,0.001192772,0.001237111,0.0010800065,0.0014066121,0.014443298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010637145,0.0005894377,0.00028672063,0.0003189712,0.0025149481,0.0014776932,0.0016238426,0.0028523132,0.00077037356],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.1604066,0.4600551,0.05638125,0.00073754013,0.0005754435,0.0011694335,0.007640813,0.0016614621,0.23237313,0.023824276,0.0025929876,0.052582044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.056286566,0.35495466,0.3853077,0.00028031765,0.0015201566,0.0026806693,0.010458297,0.025167156,0.09380367,0.055522878,0.0135623505,0.00045562405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019029406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016792391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014443298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006170568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010642979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04831767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120001707","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.08.015","title":"Turning the knots in your stomach into bows: Reappraising arousal improves performance on the GRE","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Communication in Education and Healthcare","field":"Psychology","cited_by":377,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute of Mental Health; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Arousal; Psychology; Psychophysiology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.09383774953290457,"score_gpt":0.49290500524402303,"score_spread":0.39906725571111845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120001707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910766,0.0005417623,0.0007872107,0.000733214,0.00053364085,0.00007751573,0.00009717219,0.00014514323,0.006007698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98428124,0.0008138251,0.0022540991,0.0010799986,0.0003649884,0.0002592241,0.00018969002,0.00010691873,0.010649973],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999777,0.000053496235,0.000015521238,0.000054253447,0.000039113344,0.000060638602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994373,0.00015293217,0.00007221215,0.00006176715,0.000038691396,0.0002370861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032798646,0.0007306273,0.0006632654,0.00016166538,0.00033901338,0.00079121895,0.00044903177,0.0010306996,0.011618403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021650482,0.00030351,0.00027033503,0.000108143984,0.00040130274,0.00035379356,0.0005473533,0.001792742,0.0023794782],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.075228795,0.054621074,0.0150153525,0.0012685973,0.00089864415,0.0002440592,0.0019315206,0.0009815164,0.47588858,0.00067271874,0.0178355,0.35541356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01788876,0.173209,0.67203814,0.0009774525,0.0023027207,0.00080515037,0.003494533,0.0081806565,0.09112217,0.003980357,0.02570472,0.00029630112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006050798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079630525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011618403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000110492896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023243584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038867414},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"bench_or_experimental","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2120451614","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.03.013","title":"Reducing implicit prejudice: Matching approach/avoidance strategies to contextual valence and regulatory focus","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Regulatory focus theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Valence (chemistry); Psychological intervention; Matching (statistics); Context (archaeology); Implicit attitude; Implicit-association test","score_opus":0.06411293016934111,"score_gpt":0.39270534428425785,"score_spread":0.32859241411491674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120451614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946532,0.000054709646,0.0023878687,0.00012178704,0.00002204352,0.000024039497,0.00000826684,0.000028797396,0.0026992387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965333,0.00005057973,0.0027123992,0.00007680969,0.000014260574,0.000021935564,0.000010949676,0.000023333412,0.0005564675],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995604,0.00014600562,0.000019660221,0.0001020878,0.0001179584,0.000053870266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990056,0.00039331103,0.00019137771,0.00018071597,0.00007496032,0.00015405066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000677817,0.0003013722,0.00030218644,0.00017013874,0.00019706265,0.0007600997,0.00034176552,0.00040585786,0.0029090757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045544486,0.00023158483,0.000099913355,0.00012422004,0.00032496027,0.00047478685,0.00062759407,0.0006833565,0.00037471898],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014888298,0.016136348,0.035301086,0.00044278844,0.0003684604,0.000104705214,0.002922337,0.0032077676,0.5062157,0.009161238,0.0015988518,0.4096524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008558112,0.023707122,0.55557203,0.00042627432,0.0027336327,0.00074712513,0.0045091496,0.0877561,0.23480253,0.06990339,0.011004563,0.00028001113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006624701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008346269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029090757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017349054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003731492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00973177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135449386","doi":"10.1006/jesp.2001.1505","title":"Self-Esteem, Mood, and Intentions to Use Condoms: When Does Low Self-Esteem Lead to Risky Health Behaviors?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Self-esteem; Negative mood; Mood; Condom; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Affect (linguistics); Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.12701313205981662,"score_gpt":0.48507021940782985,"score_spread":0.3580570873480132,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135449386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974203,0.0006602319,0.00005074327,0.00065614615,0.000034833356,0.000011370192,0.00009397511,0.0000024759993,0.0010698644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992482,0.00023838262,0.0000681031,0.00011211696,0.000042887335,0.000012182112,0.000064612854,0.0000014941965,0.00021205748],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992779,0.0003405844,0.000056905585,0.00009049116,0.00010238035,0.0001317269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99155223,0.0030102944,0.0022838693,0.00036229758,0.00054391124,0.002247373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020280532,0.0005714984,0.00080007367,0.0012721083,0.00095372123,0.0020482575,0.0006673902,0.0026687928,0.0026437782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009203306,0.000874356,0.0011757335,0.0010691177,0.0011910399,0.001135157,0.0007576914,0.0021855806,0.00040329195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024056452,0.0004981065,0.99612445,0.000014142902,0.000114078735,0.00008919353,0.00025947083,0.00003415261,0.000106642816,0.00006943094,0.000094910894,0.0023549115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017393257,0.00015162677,0.9987286,0.000015095464,0.000081394515,0.000074825555,0.00043411544,0.00021633515,0.00003946152,0.00016723017,0.00006662146,0.000007280306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00470127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007988954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00470127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043099892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006666861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010725498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137636713","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.011","title":"Threat, high self-esteem, and reactive approach-motivation: Electroencephalographic evidence","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Offensive; Social psychology; Self-esteem; Psychological resilience; Salience (neuroscience); Ideology; Interpretation (philosophy); Norm (philosophy); Deviance (statistics); Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Politics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04199030283745142,"score_gpt":0.3751806746611957,"score_spread":0.3331903718237443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137636713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932522,0.0010430225,0.0002877863,0.00019888404,0.000014760628,0.000015315272,0.00011194847,0.000003817177,0.005072208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99869776,0.0005692331,0.00019046276,0.000075134085,0.000046015528,0.0000135834825,0.00008518396,0.0000017455241,0.00032090928],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9999113,0.000025880585,0.000007069793,0.000014447197,0.00002574934,0.000015584941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750984,0.0013636623,0.0007338815,0.000097333985,0.00011588077,0.00017928224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033443636,0.00025534775,0.00019807274,0.0004977925,0.00023859653,0.0007560621,0.00023447897,0.00057634636,0.0029475836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031285016,0.00013623365,0.0001111642,0.0003767426,0.00061913166,0.00036494565,0.00030964988,0.0004991331,0.00015443655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006509693,0.0014061191,0.92364526,0.00029636917,0.00040393474,0.0014831832,0.0009684467,0.0002470431,0.017871896,0.0020167213,0.0004658372,0.044685513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064540975,0.00032838716,0.99659675,0.000018819483,0.00005922901,0.00076039735,0.00026781153,0.00013153016,0.00046252992,0.001050006,0.00025198614,0.00000808538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009805943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010979819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029475836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012149416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013877117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009860575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138099018","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.015","title":"Impressions at the intersection of ambiguous and obvious social categories: Does gay + Black = likable?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":87,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; Social perception; Impression formation; Sexual orientation; White (mutation); Social desirability","score_opus":0.06887726771547059,"score_gpt":0.40209274099621173,"score_spread":0.33321547328074114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138099018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908779,0.000030420015,0.00013230988,0.00025659386,0.000018150022,0.000009355813,0.00005166605,0.0000036088588,0.008619879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958104,0.000013460448,0.000052433985,0.0000355789,0.0000072504818,0.000004021942,0.00003798883,0.0000024811002,0.00026568794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989102,0.00041151966,0.000053253152,0.00012562903,0.0003074199,0.00019198257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928637,0.0026317677,0.0017996782,0.00054042245,0.0007125822,0.0014518014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018210869,0.00023128474,0.00032937116,0.0008652445,0.0010054332,0.003159555,0.00040533722,0.0010193421,0.011987042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011141938,0.00027019926,0.00037309676,0.00036870668,0.0021184788,0.002506679,0.0016587371,0.0015512864,0.0009318796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00457918,0.0011791307,0.91106665,0.00012167418,0.00030007176,0.00047814424,0.0316606,0.00031957662,0.015436871,0.006283958,0.0019181098,0.026655931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008798542,0.00031020973,0.9640887,0.00003694106,0.00008603499,0.00019306841,0.028254578,0.0008963192,0.0012790078,0.0038578233,0.0008492398,0.00006014785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005344726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062208646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011987042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004893918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000322589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040100634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143749501","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.07.017","title":"Red enhances women's attractiveness to men: First evidence suggesting universality","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Attraction; Psychology; Social psychology; Universality (dynamical systems); Interpersonal attraction; Physical attractiveness; Linguistics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.10433067721870762,"score_gpt":0.4447905451060879,"score_spread":0.34045986788738025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143749501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882057,0.00097384374,0.000836305,0.0003033096,0.0000646317,0.000017880877,0.00004947173,0.000038655086,0.009510216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952958,0.00047409095,0.00080115785,0.00018518703,0.000033048167,0.000014027694,0.00002257697,0.000022233158,0.0031517243],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997117,0.00008097532,0.000008978177,0.00006593338,0.000072735485,0.000059764996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905723,0.00040727018,0.000120778044,0.00020056542,0.000057185403,0.0001570007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048413282,0.00033078727,0.00037287737,0.00027425928,0.00032824487,0.0004918641,0.00031527216,0.0005000939,0.0061863903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000955685,0.0003136039,0.0004178918,0.00010251322,0.00058355456,0.0003540019,0.0007613646,0.00076898915,0.00025958358],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0040679337,0.00088725024,0.021028312,0.0004307394,0.00012343716,0.00061837095,0.00040646928,0.0003418222,0.92459345,0.0048731654,0.0007781346,0.04185099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002802299,0.005881068,0.6962581,0.00010969921,0.00033310414,0.002503852,0.0010759914,0.0011220543,0.27628252,0.005218373,0.01086633,0.000068630994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00050454825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00082738546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061863903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019352624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023542163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020695567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148553115","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2005.04.003","title":"On preferences and doing the right thing: Satisfaction with advantageous inequity when cognitive processing is limited","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Preference; Social psychology; Social cognition; Outcome (game theory); Cognitive resource theory; Social preferences; Cognitive psychology; Microeconomics; Economics","score_opus":0.03614128491333945,"score_gpt":0.39895059045913694,"score_spread":0.3628093055457975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148553115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99440974,0.000052144715,0.00016723508,0.00021325452,0.000008443948,0.0000042964903,0.000040634095,0.0000024340845,0.0051017557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994481,0.000020852056,0.00011461131,0.000056318167,0.0000068264635,0.000004199258,0.000038663264,0.000003832693,0.00030665408],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901974,0.00037076476,0.000055730376,0.00012692373,0.00021882005,0.00020803967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98782873,0.0051612295,0.0027225625,0.0013951749,0.0006503591,0.002241863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002024707,0.0002432004,0.00030935125,0.00057645404,0.00051451306,0.0021167859,0.00031710917,0.001320655,0.009825435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010904323,0.00022450025,0.0002997849,0.0005548846,0.0010864587,0.001149347,0.00084910286,0.0014837952,0.00052887923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0055006454,0.0050540753,0.88827884,0.00015715869,0.00041461474,0.00097402296,0.0050387923,0.0024472668,0.02209438,0.010832689,0.0016048573,0.057602547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015186249,0.0008622255,0.974151,0.000026325297,0.00009509532,0.00067949475,0.0035984423,0.0027969016,0.0013668688,0.015331378,0.0008906629,0.000049687704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014532917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002249347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009825435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036365457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003429343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03286934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153548469","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2012.05.018","title":"Smiling and sad wrinkles: Age-related changes in the face and the perception of emotions and intentions","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Institute on Aging","keywords":"Psychology; Perception; CLARITY; Social perception; Facial expression; Face perception; Impression formation; Social psychology; Face (sociological concept); Emotion perception; Cognitive psychology; Developmental psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.06609084968808818,"score_gpt":0.41272569094156003,"score_spread":0.3466348412534719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153548469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983974,0.00041755455,0.00011259859,0.00004052927,0.000028467346,0.000012723252,0.00011866724,0.0000041155204,0.0008679459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981925,0.0003555658,0.00017416073,0.00005676057,0.00003096812,0.00002287199,0.00015355214,0.0000057609595,0.0010078491],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998518,0.000021948059,0.000015651427,0.000039556533,0.000043333166,0.000027605378],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998638,0.00036271647,0.00062423793,0.00011333728,0.00013875267,0.0001228821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004227321,0.000380646,0.00021224284,0.0004726976,0.00016659287,0.00053446816,0.00013184042,0.00070538674,0.0030053072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040212786,0.00027506216,0.00023317033,0.00023099294,0.0002799968,0.0005856912,0.0003800423,0.0006121566,0.0004077237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012777606,0.0010910794,0.4910078,0.00034948502,0.00032884584,0.001248879,0.00512033,0.0007761721,0.4115813,0.00063782424,0.0018534688,0.07322714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001638747,0.0002955152,0.99686533,0.00000764066,0.0000242302,0.0003065084,0.0003228925,0.00013988589,0.0015965342,0.00014246069,0.00027055075,0.000012011714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007948133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001379582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030053072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014230044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010898033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010053694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159229527","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2010.04.006","title":"Intergroup contact facilitates physiological recovery following stressful intergroup interactions","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute","keywords":"Psychology; Anxiety; Task (project management); Reactivity (psychology); Developmental psychology; Psychological resilience; Social psychology; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.049178802319236777,"score_gpt":0.42611873061491484,"score_spread":0.3769399282956781,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159229527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99804294,0.00014444915,0.00018525896,0.00007518377,0.00006614248,0.00002058038,0.000039408038,0.000012528741,0.0014135905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99845874,0.00014164078,0.00013179929,0.00004943586,0.000050235343,0.00006179554,0.00006757977,0.000009982219,0.0010288192],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984515,0.00003233175,0.0000052875853,0.00003262149,0.000026890322,0.000057711994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993119,0.00022840424,0.00010729734,0.00009426609,0.000026383641,0.00023178215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019468018,0.00029728794,0.0004068317,0.00015365145,0.00044339764,0.0005645977,0.0001951128,0.0005398305,0.0075252145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002035217,0.0002547277,0.00015513688,0.000112695125,0.0004348514,0.00034192912,0.0006511928,0.001103836,0.00075548084],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.061432153,0.0052384567,0.0179361,0.00046196688,0.00019944014,0.0011942103,0.0037264018,0.00052094413,0.8513319,0.0009591421,0.002383092,0.054616306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000975987,0.011783648,0.9354241,0.00010241359,0.00015007895,0.0006515938,0.0025317036,0.0018139279,0.04253397,0.0015226387,0.0024653731,0.000044590564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00046786826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011365559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075252145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014175414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024809426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02517432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167879529","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2004.03.003","title":"Typicality and group variability as dual moderators of category-based inferences","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Group (periodic table); Dual (grammatical number); Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.09181674308776397,"score_gpt":0.4410116270600881,"score_spread":0.3491948839723241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167879529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9911423,0.00024296221,0.003307218,0.00039821354,0.00006507437,0.00009991987,0.00019257708,0.0000529387,0.00449885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99737465,0.00004066083,0.0017822955,0.000085370186,0.000034050532,0.00007418894,0.00010223029,0.000072005816,0.0004345705],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757726,0.0148002235,0.0011509977,0.003907395,0.0033440485,0.001024745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52647257,0.43010944,0.015242604,0.017565157,0.006324859,0.0042853374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028291991,0.0008457575,0.0012921847,0.0022781529,0.001792887,0.0045182332,0.0017168451,0.0027680313,0.007647542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19055568,0.0010668611,0.0010662794,0.0014023741,0.0031060777,0.0052013826,0.0039035492,0.003526549,0.000448397],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010516981,0.0024839423,0.89626116,0.000392352,0.0032451446,0.00055048865,0.024903353,0.0015992252,0.013173977,0.010852296,0.0012634707,0.03475763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046764038,0.0010607822,0.955843,0.0000991316,0.0017964055,0.00045528705,0.0039134556,0.008668076,0.005301024,0.021226037,0.0010167051,0.00015247108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020771716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00223511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028291991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063931174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009658612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14962411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2235563052","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.08.005","title":"Time, money, and happiness: Does putting a price on time affect our ability to smell the roses?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Happiness; Economics; Monetary economics; Psychology; Keynesian economics; Social psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.02971992071340533,"score_gpt":0.41195107998539693,"score_spread":0.3822311592719916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2235563052","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99633443,0.00030592503,0.00008685774,0.00065746275,0.000026283464,0.0000059865397,0.000066233966,0.0000026597584,0.0025141942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887794,0.00013952746,0.00013415462,0.00014773794,0.00001978924,0.000011265649,0.00004619916,0.0000053652225,0.00061798346],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994987,0.00023205971,0.000018763194,0.00008505152,0.000078249635,0.000087168584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99566686,0.001642547,0.0012453046,0.0003535062,0.00029460396,0.0007971568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009872759,0.00032704227,0.00041725015,0.00044205348,0.00070527854,0.002091189,0.0005336809,0.0019381138,0.0059955595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007448147,0.00056422653,0.00050278177,0.0004331923,0.0011502693,0.0012318528,0.00096657925,0.0011691259,0.0006122213],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009766579,0.0038092316,0.90747285,0.00026134003,0.0010217357,0.0006200871,0.009089425,0.0009818265,0.019827554,0.004386875,0.003148583,0.0396139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007487111,0.000291747,0.99401194,0.00001780269,0.0001625603,0.0000906249,0.0019065642,0.00052878563,0.00040525268,0.0019751596,0.00049998757,0.000034679448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041929577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067102043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059955595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037688285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030663106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020057201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270004246","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.002","title":"Nice guys finish first when presented second: Responsive daters are evaluated more positively following exposure to unresponsive daters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Attractiveness; Physical attractiveness; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Affect (linguistics); Romance; Developmental psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.05568576189255272,"score_gpt":0.4131268397038133,"score_spread":0.3574410778112606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270004246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977477,0.000033937325,0.000047559824,0.000048512848,0.00003031459,0.000007675934,0.000019579253,0.000009459732,0.002055338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948862,0.00008767831,0.00025668397,0.00017931208,0.000038520353,0.0000318751,0.00013714888,0.00003270798,0.004349762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922895,0.0002012297,0.000033985023,0.00013340665,0.0003007521,0.00010170437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941654,0.0016776524,0.0017420644,0.00051587267,0.00033038558,0.0015685846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009883078,0.00041266336,0.0005677214,0.0005501028,0.00069037435,0.0023311435,0.00040810966,0.001093957,0.012584865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009529945,0.0003914827,0.000377758,0.00024029278,0.0005555228,0.00069622,0.00096436375,0.0019685426,0.001356443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.022585368,0.014701391,0.4810977,0.0005101056,0.0005489387,0.0027008913,0.03158275,0.00052779686,0.3599051,0.0017700737,0.0057852473,0.078284636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015596619,0.0033114543,0.98255193,0.000048016303,0.00010957655,0.00031228588,0.006321956,0.00032556406,0.0045353295,0.0005917659,0.0016772234,0.000058976577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021451786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027827758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012584865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041290594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031287284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04210055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274005395","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.012","title":"When possessions become part of the self: Ownership and implicit self-object linking","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Object (grammar); Psychology; Social psychology; Associative property; Association (psychology); Perception; Representation (politics); Self; Mental representation; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Computer science; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.04749759309534253,"score_gpt":0.3981284027876566,"score_spread":0.3506308096923141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274005395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98710597,0.00006733968,0.0022474008,0.00021702901,0.000020113663,0.000011311714,0.000021765798,0.000010373701,0.010298624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986727,0.000027077891,0.00051718205,0.000023451263,0.0000051096176,0.000005654903,0.000026745023,0.000011766087,0.0007102196],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914384,0.00022343641,0.000055082317,0.00019950453,0.00023376865,0.00014435442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901215,0.0045535327,0.0023987207,0.0017941259,0.00044655215,0.00068563694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016740272,0.00016599066,0.0002753156,0.00054280675,0.00051037804,0.002817772,0.00052745984,0.0010711653,0.006007586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022901373,0.0004946589,0.00016486364,0.0004239985,0.0018900037,0.00633569,0.0027787413,0.0015283885,0.00032935294],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043012705,0.002236233,0.48352095,0.00040251832,0.00023229573,0.0019010046,0.069439314,0.0023804668,0.116973564,0.14540052,0.0017387788,0.17147312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018130006,0.00060556934,0.73819065,0.00025625384,0.00025761154,0.0026115577,0.02921093,0.013456692,0.016432393,0.1928191,0.0057969647,0.00018103761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068218977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008529149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006007586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027207003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003954117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020097375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2295220506","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.08.006","title":"Attachment avoidance and amends-making: A case advocating the need for attempting to replicate one's own work","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Replicate; Work (physics); Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09399187242667857,"score_gpt":0.469692033772605,"score_spread":0.37570016134592643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2295220506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7647694,0.0011188763,0.011909422,0.05926407,0.0017885255,0.0002952966,0.00003685177,0.0001381062,0.16067941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961127,0.00026633407,0.0025274665,0.001809706,0.000106330575,0.000041247615,0.000008203229,0.000021283622,0.005608256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99468046,0.0027843474,0.00019361061,0.0005018679,0.0011385739,0.00070106646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872613,0.0048236055,0.0018360752,0.0039273105,0.00093433453,0.0012173319],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008478475,0.0007118301,0.0005832929,0.0016922461,0.012335518,0.0043092323,0.0035128503,0.008301253,0.003362257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042035583,0.00050150737,0.00083842507,0.0008830968,0.024426192,0.0054933215,0.005077264,0.009985107,0.00042431412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022965808,0.00083382183,0.025552638,0.00014730026,0.00007666305,0.14768785,0.27593896,0.00052359514,0.0023348888,0.47201383,0.010300427,0.0643604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017820093,0.0004087947,0.013887665,0.00068907405,0.00017709854,0.33961603,0.3270527,0.0046749245,0.003378206,0.2208474,0.08885275,0.00023720674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063377623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010862385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99152154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028793088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005210856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044839025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2309036171","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.10.001","title":"The pipeline project: Pre-publication independent replications of a single laboratory's research pipeline","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Replication (statistics); Pipeline (software); Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Applied psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.22162705453350162,"score_gpt":0.4530841344992813,"score_spread":0.2314570799657797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2309036171","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13825315,0.0020890308,0.60222507,0.013623408,0.009402378,0.19809265,0.005026824,0.0075805583,0.023706941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21776749,0.00048923126,0.51160574,0.0043631876,0.0009392927,0.25499085,0.0023086378,0.0016988827,0.0058367387],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5661883,0.34917045,0.017750923,0.017427687,0.04383276,0.005629961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.21176076,0.30196035,0.030424863,0.32371524,0.12347857,0.0086601805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.49760187,0.0026744022,0.0027484007,0.0057972535,0.0076480852,0.0064311824,0.0070417323,0.0047473484,0.008875184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6412652,0.0037128804,0.004063467,0.0041568046,0.008789837,0.0074790274,0.014837662,0.007930945,0.0048001413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025021512,0.008671467,0.034550697,0.014645714,0.006179684,0.0032878509,0.09161231,0.0061693084,0.032081623,0.06592183,0.14505458,0.56680346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04379346,0.035525497,0.07585033,0.008447373,0.005163588,0.0022857564,0.02348718,0.02045952,0.07275344,0.17484088,0.5353821,0.0020108193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033422522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054088803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50239813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049293214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03366666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6195464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2470426344","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.06.009","title":"How people can become persuaded by weak messages presented by credible communicators: Not all sleeper effects are created equal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Institute of Nursing Research; National Institute of Mental Health","keywords":"Persuasion; Recall; Regulatory focus theory; Psychology; Social psychology; Focus (optics); Persuasive communication; Attitude change; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.042066787516796655,"score_gpt":0.3865237570538833,"score_spread":0.34445696953708665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2470426344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8149312,0.00059807254,0.0068559186,0.010838095,0.00049776013,0.000054252774,0.00005795277,0.00012256404,0.16604412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98946303,0.00013989383,0.0011924971,0.0012288395,0.00008505934,0.000023110668,0.000022030661,0.000052298747,0.007793253],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980494,0.00095393363,0.00004852409,0.0002780384,0.00045384542,0.00021617772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764425,0.015928831,0.0024359245,0.0021904095,0.0012905662,0.0017118076],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002946918,0.00037036557,0.00027536863,0.00069325947,0.001317572,0.0037510365,0.00050548307,0.0028924113,0.020770445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02758057,0.00057602976,0.00037924823,0.00020772856,0.002708517,0.005335927,0.0020330246,0.002718347,0.0023833865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058115404,0.0029205014,0.10262156,0.0016938663,0.0011943587,0.0024514187,0.16519676,0.0025745502,0.11500107,0.25223592,0.029228155,0.31907028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002274489,0.0041783117,0.2507534,0.0008764672,0.0025488108,0.0023438325,0.081434354,0.014989397,0.033612955,0.5170736,0.0893753,0.00053905835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009805687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013932721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020770445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033735813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055847113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069484115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2517219323","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.08.003","title":"Culture as automatic processes for making meaning: Spontaneous trait inferences","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology","keywords":"Trait; Psychology; Unconscious mind; Meaning (existential); Recall; Social psychology; Impression formation; Meaning-making; Cognitive psychology; Social perception; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.12388911477168273,"score_gpt":0.46884148297293415,"score_spread":0.3449523682012514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2517219323","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9785928,0.00009610827,0.013696963,0.00019802191,0.00003266394,0.000047085574,0.0001746814,0.00007957632,0.0070821345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99650025,0.000040797568,0.0029929047,0.000049335693,0.00001615798,0.000026300551,0.00007460835,0.00004323955,0.00025629863],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976878,0.0011893768,0.00014723171,0.00040599212,0.00043683013,0.00013269804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9538193,0.034855284,0.0036628346,0.0051242714,0.0018813524,0.00065698096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036853238,0.0002967403,0.0002224853,0.0005497954,0.00047161203,0.0032972705,0.00041514557,0.0009769031,0.0026835855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07178156,0.00054027466,0.00028830502,0.00049028336,0.0008507817,0.003465526,0.0011863365,0.0017174672,0.00043808066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030216393,0.001297341,0.37188646,0.0010433543,0.00097112934,0.0011708048,0.082141936,0.0050677746,0.2746183,0.077419266,0.003186334,0.17817566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022620586,0.00068583846,0.7551974,0.00021201109,0.0004667134,0.0016229817,0.0129559,0.0500226,0.049240448,0.12441102,0.004648852,0.00031007052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068642653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00066032854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036853238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002524162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029878225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019490123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519235992","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.004","title":"Replications with MTurkers who are naïve versus experienced with academic studies: A comment on Connors, Khamitov, Moroz, Campbell, and Henderson (2015)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Neural Networks and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Python (programming language); Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Human intelligence; Artificial neural network; Cognition; Tree (set theory); Bayesian probability; Machine learning; Psychology; Cognitive science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08002235431030248,"score_gpt":0.4121358960628001,"score_spread":0.33211354175249763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519235992","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050518624,0.0021773393,0.0022294794,0.9231758,0.011354572,0.00027716288,0.0008793379,0.00010865433,0.009279063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23568204,0.0017189411,0.0037992515,0.7318712,0.0075547476,0.0016225496,0.0004125315,0.00013963162,0.017199093],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9696969,0.014080856,0.0030740183,0.004099045,0.0074013188,0.0016478752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68154806,0.23435192,0.014545701,0.020091183,0.042728085,0.00673511],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05630259,0.00075439527,0.0011356967,0.0011420241,0.009487766,0.004225301,0.007423063,0.019793065,0.007255287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32437497,0.0007912363,0.0017677423,0.0015877064,0.006651004,0.006223067,0.0042114523,0.015267121,0.0034105545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023974904,0.0006488602,0.04620656,0.0006540441,0.00024263955,0.0022019553,0.08095786,0.00015970797,0.0020762782,0.023670157,0.7860815,0.054702923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010951842,0.0013962513,0.17411871,0.0034933158,0.00076850347,0.0024844077,0.17860122,0.0011688545,0.009947883,0.041258,0.5850731,0.0005945498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06282317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078223184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9436974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032820124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052850405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29776013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531088400","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.10.002","title":"Ask in person: You're less persuasive than you think over email","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Compliance (psychology); Moderation; Social psychology; Empathy; Internet privacy; Ask price; Instant messaging; Face-to-face; Face (sociological concept); Computer-mediated communication; World Wide Web; Computer science; The Internet","score_opus":0.08456002414087817,"score_gpt":0.43590123212049947,"score_spread":0.3513412079796213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531088400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95541525,0.00046737408,0.0022165256,0.009228282,0.00081372116,0.0000933963,0.0003607766,0.00020646177,0.031198192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817763,0.00023085352,0.0015302547,0.004707607,0.00026162327,0.00014043217,0.00017074295,0.000071761715,0.0111104185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970373,0.0016446814,0.00022219987,0.00027972145,0.0006619065,0.00015425368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621753,0.027508736,0.0045601046,0.0016823695,0.002914605,0.0011588616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031163841,0.00046847612,0.00044429398,0.0005819186,0.0012730488,0.0026794577,0.00036146338,0.0024385392,0.02684511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050889783,0.00030109708,0.0003609954,0.00030555337,0.00066863064,0.0022503177,0.0009207829,0.001784456,0.004128771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010132257,0.0068918206,0.3428114,0.00342968,0.0017507562,0.0012055025,0.19935103,0.00087633374,0.08530977,0.022749245,0.11031101,0.21518126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002513776,0.008295838,0.5444873,0.0016670884,0.0038685296,0.0039125336,0.21700205,0.006574757,0.05242887,0.04623423,0.112250954,0.00076399004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005268152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005790209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02684511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038675687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003163787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08980578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554083386","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2016.11.003","title":"Does exposure to erotica reduce attraction and love for romantic partners in men? Independent replications of Kenrick, Gutierres, and Goldberg (1989) study 2","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Attractiveness; Psychology; Attraction; Social psychology; Romance; Physical attractiveness; Sexual attraction; Interpersonal attraction; Developmental psychology; Sexual behavior; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.06626889858945938,"score_gpt":0.4553643635573397,"score_spread":0.38909546496788033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554083386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99963236,0.00003416395,0.000019242401,0.000029588578,0.0000050139774,0.000012775903,0.000014995861,0.0000012236832,0.0002507657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906117,0.00006239556,0.000080957674,0.000066731154,0.000010585947,0.000031831205,0.000029980461,0.0000014703489,0.00065489125],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995951,0.00021817465,0.000016805063,0.00006063,0.00005815369,0.000051135976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790525,0.00082158146,0.000304506,0.000553571,0.000076477896,0.00033857548],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010656645,0.0003576828,0.0004390832,0.00019190337,0.00092575786,0.00068687776,0.0003759966,0.0007142556,0.0040881997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035942188,0.00042749653,0.00044890912,0.00015415055,0.0009230623,0.00039899966,0.00053070625,0.00095080014,0.00036352477],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.06927956,0.11677675,0.6119182,0.0005520088,0.0017233726,0.0013533641,0.016394893,0.00025439364,0.11680436,0.0014934088,0.0014013085,0.06204837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013267602,0.04383491,0.9394526,0.000017084436,0.00035583688,0.00038244523,0.0048042014,0.00017885746,0.0077637364,0.0004964255,0.0013519995,0.00003514105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020827586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00331983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016642871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034312854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013676345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2577827438","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.01.005","title":"When God's (not) needed: Spotlight on how belief in divine control influences goal commitment","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Religiosity; Social psychology; Salience (neuroscience); Self-efficacy; Set (abstract data type); Contingency; Control (management); Cognitive psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.057158888567429095,"score_gpt":0.424743244923401,"score_spread":0.36758435635597186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2577827438","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9720052,0.00064183236,0.0019218343,0.0039928094,0.00008473605,0.000015102356,0.00006271494,0.000012827425,0.021262951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858296,0.00014772206,0.0004521323,0.00023335306,0.0000088930665,0.0000055459545,0.000024692084,0.000020031857,0.0005245769],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989166,0.0005259647,0.00002430327,0.00016795777,0.00020738416,0.0001577885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930784,0.0032980929,0.0009585118,0.0007643599,0.0006447104,0.001255842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024578623,0.00013346683,0.0002969016,0.000431735,0.0008995163,0.003792259,0.0006563791,0.0010055198,0.005010434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014519114,0.00026133232,0.00016670793,0.00057943386,0.0024626194,0.0016751902,0.0011812364,0.0029456234,0.00030156333],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014053207,0.0025019245,0.5780854,0.0005734107,0.0006098358,0.0005783222,0.09301092,0.001276192,0.016123708,0.109534904,0.0069750557,0.18932503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062063176,0.00021598456,0.88864875,0.00030915486,0.00014515847,0.0001936339,0.036067512,0.0020163166,0.0017007954,0.06186333,0.00869222,0.000085098094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005465287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01238151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005465287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071879313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014399656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016761541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605644184","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.003","title":"Liberals and conservatives are similarly motivated to avoid exposure to one another's opinions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":381,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ideology; Cognitive dissonance; Social psychology; Politics; Psychology; Presidential election; Presidential system; Variety (cybernetics); Positive economics; Political science; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.11332946039765963,"score_gpt":0.44642561985555507,"score_spread":0.33309615945789545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605644184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858782,0.000048586746,0.00012382226,0.00036186114,0.00003272975,0.000019595935,0.000018405062,0.0000066713537,0.013510169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939109,0.00005482535,0.00015761529,0.00062576606,0.000024890101,0.000021894413,0.000043505217,0.0000055096516,0.005155176],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933904,0.00017654973,0.00002589329,0.000044473974,0.00025148067,0.00016262368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950303,0.0012932944,0.0017052271,0.00022511199,0.0002814305,0.0014645976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097328273,0.00021272746,0.00030441908,0.00067822373,0.0011219345,0.0028247111,0.00017045473,0.0010760388,0.010147286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043795994,0.00023478745,0.00020958034,0.00031371156,0.000912143,0.00044315806,0.000884769,0.001199004,0.0010391794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004198897,0.00792463,0.7540881,0.00021867483,0.00041274002,0.0024305745,0.029342914,0.0006397296,0.08795104,0.029985618,0.009819116,0.07298793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061405194,0.0016212385,0.9287578,0.000064426604,0.0001486227,0.0012168204,0.03279535,0.0012049682,0.0040459814,0.010698747,0.018735422,0.000096532414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007242724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014852124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010147286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023934615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029280307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033946037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745399087","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.07.007","title":"Configural processing and social judgments: Face inversion particularly disrupts inferences of human-relevant traits","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Trait; Social cognition; Social perception; Cognitive psychology; Cognition; Face perception; Perception; Social psychology; Trustworthiness; Dominance (genetics); Neuroscience","score_opus":0.10257790081811852,"score_gpt":0.4480112312210825,"score_spread":0.345433330402964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745399087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949921,0.000038012276,0.002029642,0.0002452541,0.00006596665,0.000017111433,0.000071626535,0.000062765925,0.002477534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99732697,0.00002473902,0.0013543188,0.00025313196,0.000019891275,0.000017821396,0.00007066638,0.00010117589,0.00083127886],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926335,0.000106914704,0.000044416603,0.00022129845,0.00027187433,0.00009217749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973803,0.0009539226,0.00057919114,0.0006099488,0.0001219737,0.00035468914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058757485,0.00043504898,0.0003457453,0.00028831273,0.00034150903,0.0009435702,0.00054495654,0.0010485167,0.0059041297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070664613,0.0003367614,0.00016778131,0.00014308772,0.00079212687,0.0006609546,0.00088734704,0.0015923657,0.00048502124],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014992727,0.0003480117,0.007017956,0.000036478566,0.000039364084,0.00025982154,0.00019144817,0.00026637447,0.9779896,0.0008330647,0.00045042846,0.011068174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033012917,0.0021374668,0.60226214,0.00006164584,0.00019215893,0.005056931,0.00085802324,0.016783103,0.35486436,0.014562985,0.0027487946,0.00014228588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010898733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015579922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059041297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003052648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040531135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01975131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2748746790","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.007","title":"Smartphone use undermines enjoyment of face-to-face social interactions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Impact of Technology on Adolescents","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":397,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia","keywords":"Psychology; Experience sampling method; Phone; Social psychology; Globe; Face (sociological concept); Advertising; Sociology","score_opus":0.11186482078267161,"score_gpt":0.4840579868031979,"score_spread":0.37219316602052627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2748746790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99889696,0.0000380512,0.00004086376,0.000039882943,0.000004234068,0.000005297615,0.000045695244,0.0000036330582,0.0009253856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941945,0.000041536943,0.000092980736,0.000029616544,0.000004190528,0.000011449119,0.00004791389,0.0000036188196,0.00034920007],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915123,0.00026614493,0.000057899262,0.00014043068,0.00023852025,0.00014573723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993701,0.002982193,0.0015981545,0.00044378598,0.00038609377,0.00088888203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006689605,0.00030273866,0.00030468736,0.0003821367,0.00031994487,0.0014255219,0.00032124016,0.0006947105,0.005528221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010209214,0.00026874716,0.00042789,0.0001982802,0.00042611707,0.0006651823,0.0011229224,0.00062727503,0.000529846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029121195,0.0021094389,0.9179722,0.00026428784,0.00034421438,0.0005094352,0.006277611,0.0001517356,0.03213231,0.00041445176,0.0006803989,0.03623183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001454945,0.0004982419,0.9966176,0.00001703932,0.00005959605,0.0001306999,0.0014665213,0.00018659687,0.00064914214,0.0000986839,0.0002539758,0.000007337583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019786684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038311332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005528221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022475363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030013753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018493712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2756176742","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.08.001","title":"Intergroup dissimilarity predicts physiological synchrony and affiliation in intergroup interaction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Friendship; Similarity (geometry); Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Interpersonal relationship; Interpersonal interaction; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.0842953947277413,"score_gpt":0.4655309299338072,"score_spread":0.3812355352060659,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2756176742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99916446,0.00002137897,0.00012745852,0.0000314178,0.0000067398996,0.0000030527515,0.000029931192,0.0000017755957,0.00061381125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99971133,0.0000136468425,0.000055871373,0.0000106255575,0.0000085168285,0.0000051706566,0.00005095741,0.0000018822165,0.00014201959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996902,0.00010262234,0.000013290826,0.000077399825,0.000064258995,0.000052212457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969074,0.001407963,0.00072010705,0.00020977487,0.00013373976,0.0006211371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005886284,0.00020647759,0.00026617598,0.00034428076,0.00041579313,0.000994393,0.00018349373,0.0005929727,0.0029587299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051077986,0.0002637888,0.00014245522,0.00027162008,0.00042267062,0.00043301767,0.00095025497,0.00068911683,0.00037264763],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018892247,0.0006991313,0.94874567,0.000038827864,0.0001735118,0.00018973343,0.0014426851,0.0007392654,0.038556974,0.00055162294,0.0002511183,0.0067222225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009911241,0.000069105125,0.9985726,0.0000016989123,0.000010838278,0.000042411488,0.00020132358,0.00056196377,0.00028052565,0.0002059982,0.000040247283,0.0000034311574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087427394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001977903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029587299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015190334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015829278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009898007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761837102","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2017.09.010","title":"Personal conflict impairs performance on an unrelated self-control task: Lingering costs of uncertainty and conflict","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Waterloo","funders":"National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research; National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Anagrams; Anagram; Psychology; CLARITY; Task (project management); Control (management); Social psychology; Self-control; Ego depletion; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.06916744215110165,"score_gpt":0.44896161210556423,"score_spread":0.3797941699544626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761837102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991616,0.00005404097,0.00017620788,0.00006357358,0.000007580887,0.0000028244835,0.000012349573,0.000005423378,0.00051631726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99938977,0.000042439315,0.00016434131,0.000045852667,0.000010846258,0.0000062019635,0.000019363633,0.0000083827135,0.0003127007],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99954563,0.00013134918,0.000031709358,0.00007900083,0.00015816666,0.000054182678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781585,0.00091565104,0.0005111996,0.00033307532,0.000058293284,0.00036591984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063891825,0.00044446616,0.00031958817,0.00031330416,0.00027378404,0.0007272509,0.00034596308,0.000780134,0.0027883747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003930524,0.00047803312,0.00017973078,0.00018709216,0.0005629081,0.0004548808,0.00061393395,0.0010419606,0.00019889485],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048063725,0.018076906,0.2718587,0.00034104032,0.001265761,0.002133247,0.0018847379,0.0036257417,0.5652686,0.002303756,0.0024345259,0.08274328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048071894,0.0035335408,0.96900743,0.00003417673,0.0002739386,0.0011630184,0.00040807077,0.0041974965,0.018136265,0.00220734,0.00052070693,0.000037254737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012644063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001329826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0027883747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013965885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031753816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009328008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803408794","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2018.04.006","title":"Effortful experiences of self-control foster lay theories that self-control is limited","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Self-control; Psychology; Control (management); Ego depletion; Social psychology; Task (project management); Self; Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.044102584176702236,"score_gpt":0.41925145985713613,"score_spread":0.37514887568043387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803408794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9524751,0.00012759835,0.0062328144,0.0010530115,0.000061169434,0.000016312493,0.000010755773,0.000020414298,0.04000289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986992,0.000019546222,0.0002453768,0.00006908384,0.0000066419257,0.0000056470662,0.000004347622,0.0000041941184,0.00094583194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888414,0.0004739475,0.000039552826,0.0001294638,0.00029220147,0.00018066987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916231,0.0039322833,0.0011137357,0.0018057658,0.00037780224,0.0011472697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002267963,0.00026910048,0.00021435016,0.0005235371,0.0013010888,0.003073185,0.00035083306,0.0007382087,0.003579986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007860614,0.00026654673,0.0001867375,0.0002030642,0.0043711723,0.0021053397,0.0027828973,0.0030595425,0.00016195128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011505525,0.005015049,0.10170406,0.0002549699,0.0002439252,0.0014601991,0.22793017,0.0014052241,0.030247033,0.55069673,0.002756109,0.07713598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045201165,0.0018017984,0.30582216,0.00039465673,0.00033456794,0.0023840626,0.12496266,0.008374783,0.016266376,0.49407458,0.044951025,0.00018120195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045349103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070285634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003579986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044859198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006490855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011994243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884986557","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.005","title":"Affirmation prevents long-term weight gain","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Obesity and Health Practices","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Stanford University","keywords":"Weight gain; Psychology; Weight loss; Body mass index; Weight change; Developmental psychology; Weight control; Body weight; Term (time); Social psychology; Obesity; Endocrinology; Medicine","score_opus":0.11468137398352693,"score_gpt":0.565628252169437,"score_spread":0.45094687818591006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884986557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974847,0.00040387802,0.00018592735,0.00047528316,0.0002102391,0.000026268575,0.00004079105,0.000057265202,0.001115612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958896,0.0005133354,0.00036782448,0.00020459594,0.00010425789,0.000046342935,0.00007699542,0.0000146280545,0.0027824794],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995828,0.0001477393,0.000021069367,0.000060128295,0.000056868965,0.00013137248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976604,0.00092127844,0.00031098622,0.0003042357,0.00008124693,0.0007218712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000936662,0.00035007278,0.0012250136,0.00031322052,0.0006629397,0.000597954,0.0007078123,0.0014788483,0.011354812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031630772,0.00027762065,0.00039991946,0.00015285124,0.0011453944,0.00059766765,0.00093187165,0.0019421709,0.0011650332],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.2974693,0.25845754,0.017456364,0.0014004443,0.001322006,0.00062422914,0.0018155928,0.0008063843,0.12820308,0.0052729566,0.0074393754,0.27973276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.107912175,0.417278,0.28627962,0.0012213391,0.0024394342,0.0013400138,0.004602835,0.009348528,0.12038824,0.016332949,0.032515362,0.00034151468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017176046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017201975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011354812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028390612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089614704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037985623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885616749","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.004","title":"Is research in social psychology politically biased? Systematic empirical tests and a forecasting survey to address the controversy","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Marsden Fund; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education; Institut Européen d'Administration des Affaires","keywords":"Conservatism; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Empirical research; Field (mathematics); Explanatory power; Sample (material); Response bias; Pessimism; Positive economics; Social science; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.45956460045830977,"score_gpt":0.5971191704925078,"score_spread":0.13755457003419808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885616749","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93575495,0.00852227,0.028272713,0.015537422,0.000484975,0.0009511881,0.00042912737,0.00008923416,0.009957976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99181765,0.000592602,0.0053490307,0.001356548,0.00017686505,0.00042521735,0.00015017515,0.000007933007,0.00012401254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8161483,0.15336755,0.009013253,0.006824111,0.012706579,0.0019402022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.24714775,0.60830766,0.06859293,0.044133935,0.030024005,0.0017937836],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20123585,0.00063349726,0.0010226395,0.0058906334,0.001964611,0.0036902244,0.0011851455,0.0020624667,0.0022024917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44827807,0.0004903645,0.0008594262,0.006148835,0.0075462833,0.0048924508,0.0021870025,0.0015632318,0.00030378328],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008503117,0.00069516274,0.8136727,0.0015455768,0.002597957,0.00031350745,0.013377799,0.0018927783,0.0014591601,0.05338211,0.003918201,0.10629477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009037363,0.0024855558,0.7900219,0.003369589,0.0028376454,0.0004896742,0.025050052,0.030791651,0.0042949175,0.11172709,0.02784406,0.00018411753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025878204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023581558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79876417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021666288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039642183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98501843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W290633941","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.006","title":"Give a piece of you: Gifts that reflect givers promote closeness","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Canadian Institute for Advanced Research","keywords":"Closeness; Gift giving; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Preference; Perception","score_opus":0.1125277416284557,"score_gpt":0.4968327355029637,"score_spread":0.384304993874508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W290633941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828814,0.00014837978,0.00064837164,0.0014108613,0.0001644557,0.000019687192,0.000023100043,0.000021404225,0.014682317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979868,0.00006210768,0.00044199167,0.00017044751,0.00001818599,0.000012594232,0.0000135950595,0.000011480506,0.0012828666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990939,0.0005428982,0.000027100627,0.00007399583,0.00017433993,0.00008766446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938543,0.0023121126,0.0010502128,0.00077995745,0.00020926069,0.0017942691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020799052,0.00022033477,0.00032023384,0.0003095082,0.0018187334,0.0020124144,0.0003897086,0.0012398089,0.00915734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013300257,0.0003299611,0.00018020128,0.0002674596,0.0018841174,0.0012985318,0.0020606872,0.0019679684,0.0006359993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018397449,0.014593546,0.23877527,0.0016434955,0.0007211539,0.0035162547,0.21297564,0.0020501888,0.12832697,0.14135024,0.02365907,0.2139907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033946345,0.006712963,0.6259104,0.0004336199,0.00096083176,0.0046571004,0.16880305,0.0046805786,0.015937204,0.115804814,0.052381244,0.00032356233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045618258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088153104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00915734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037734496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029720238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030634344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915152171","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2019.02.003","title":"Revisiting cultural differences in emotion perception between easterners and westerners: Chinese perceivers are accurate, but see additional non-intended emotions in negative facial expressions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Psychology; Categorization; Facial expression; Perception; Emotional expression; Face perception; Social psychology; Emotion perception; Social perception; Cognitive psychology; Facial Action Coding System; Communication; Linguistics","score_opus":0.07182499135641192,"score_gpt":0.380561172623393,"score_spread":0.3087361812669811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915152171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982272,0.000030748946,0.0001317372,0.000045370205,0.000012554869,0.000004231952,0.00003066297,0.000001439326,0.0015160284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991109,0.000033780318,0.00012929774,0.00006359824,0.000007497404,0.0000050961708,0.00004148644,0.0000056232598,0.0006026575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99978894,0.000035330693,0.000015875175,0.000058553782,0.00006667782,0.000034747663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926573,0.00019086883,0.00015544557,0.00011569263,0.00018368424,0.000088537614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085649826,0.00033220847,0.0001364708,0.0002791577,0.00033550232,0.0007610136,0.00020310041,0.00022559178,0.0033369719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018318413,0.000108306114,0.00017994201,0.00020139974,0.0007493257,0.0006235681,0.00040191432,0.0005197342,0.00030046652],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020717168,0.00022060955,0.4746506,0.00019193962,0.0002462855,0.00068384554,0.03901268,0.00018358078,0.43693075,0.00201667,0.0012775807,0.042513754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015733638,0.000075237076,0.9876166,0.000009389501,0.000040210598,0.00012645294,0.0050698817,0.00027871336,0.00609434,0.00019926288,0.0004620972,0.000012034659],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008341882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013932834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008341882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024426077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021299394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016586661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916955430","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2019.02.005","title":"Does it matter if a week starts on Monday or Sunday? How calendar format can boost goal motivation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06901891063293299,"score_gpt":0.424901828994338,"score_spread":0.355882918361405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916955430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95902675,0.0010296308,0.0026972585,0.005919725,0.0012376514,0.00022738433,0.00035485727,0.00020537683,0.029301323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98729414,0.0007288898,0.0043352307,0.0009320188,0.00024913053,0.000249055,0.00028013918,0.0000770435,0.0058542946],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995571,0.00017956318,0.000022375776,0.000061943276,0.00009114862,0.00008779163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99486744,0.0019938832,0.0004842609,0.00031585203,0.00035594348,0.001982624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001578761,0.0002358775,0.0004583037,0.00039302369,0.00074973213,0.002299514,0.0005049791,0.00068586547,0.018007675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012445761,0.00024076542,0.0004743833,0.00039293937,0.00034322587,0.0013290979,0.00074293505,0.001485721,0.0023317102],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0127426395,0.04450434,0.2430372,0.0011530585,0.0006451783,0.00027248132,0.0057714675,0.0015632238,0.009719824,0.012667234,0.03199813,0.6359253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026996369,0.009992869,0.8775379,0.0010380297,0.0013765305,0.00019086634,0.0078112674,0.0051238607,0.0034168307,0.03200675,0.058579434,0.00022596959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023208482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048362766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018007675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053134834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012771678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06024164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964441192","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103854","title":"How innuendo shapes impressions of task and intimacy groups","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Wilfrid Laurier University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Task (project management); Impression formation; Social perception; Perception","score_opus":0.030090021263314636,"score_gpt":0.3983603214320788,"score_spread":0.36827030016876416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964441192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9895085,0.000031215048,0.00031730253,0.00013153085,0.000015125736,0.0000057237635,0.00003490762,0.000011670064,0.009944035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998459,0.000014160022,0.0001567758,0.000029904098,0.0000050384733,0.0000050191748,0.000037417038,0.00001954398,0.0012730762],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992723,0.00019650477,0.000022928918,0.0001447427,0.00026861427,0.00009497965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936752,0.0034897095,0.00093184935,0.00060268346,0.0003948079,0.00090573163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000951618,0.00018198985,0.00025069297,0.00044456913,0.00056721916,0.0029617234,0.0003800477,0.00066517753,0.008754189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011225809,0.00029772418,0.00013576394,0.00020921617,0.0007607098,0.0012297232,0.000867818,0.00074233173,0.00050212344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008078376,0.0023680597,0.6533347,0.00017486307,0.00023242313,0.00047670532,0.017799415,0.0018562836,0.21782562,0.013805758,0.0026213333,0.08142652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101985315,0.00053180504,0.9759744,0.000027260881,0.00006913556,0.00013840284,0.004488366,0.003605702,0.0069455975,0.0061397916,0.0019306302,0.000047009056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033909595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053748926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008754189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043202608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025271988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02928567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2965461121","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103855","title":"Foreign language effects on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Narodowe Centrum Nauki; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Psychology; Utilitarianism; Action (physics); Social psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Deontological ethics; Moral disengagement; Moral dilemma; Dilemma; Social cognitive theory of morality; Moral reasoning; Morality; Moral development; Epistemology","score_opus":0.11779810106051966,"score_gpt":0.39012583285125385,"score_spread":0.2723277317907342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2965461121","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98138064,0.00012487356,0.006025009,0.00015653398,0.000086259824,0.000096506046,0.00048290635,0.00007659489,0.011570713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99299836,0.00008693059,0.002498015,0.00012627522,0.00004084501,0.00017934121,0.00049062417,0.0001813528,0.0033982615],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651104,0.0017656757,0.00015728276,0.0006900401,0.00054788345,0.0003281185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9284149,0.06194764,0.0015952822,0.00385988,0.002419735,0.0017626593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007057223,0.001376657,0.0022395465,0.001197551,0.0011265492,0.0032903154,0.0019038463,0.0021411504,0.023070024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051353488,0.00047638145,0.001660324,0.0010325733,0.0015814481,0.0022400348,0.0022635218,0.003483719,0.002111613],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.13821726,0.015109946,0.35022843,0.0022883825,0.0041261124,0.0073566777,0.017579705,0.056660898,0.18997721,0.063636534,0.009234536,0.14558439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026937774,0.0064514843,0.6672551,0.00024113872,0.004610285,0.0029045707,0.0043831617,0.2469361,0.023849884,0.03314318,0.0068948134,0.0006364955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013411677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052947607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023070024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015880852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013060189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07717699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994977059","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103941","title":"Re-assessing the incremental predictive validity of Implicit Association Tests","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Predictive validity; Incremental validity; Reliability (semiconductor); Implicit-association test; Validity; Regression analysis; Linear regression; Structural equation modeling; Test (biology); Association (psychology); Regression; Argument (complex analysis); Social psychology; Test validity; Statistics; Clinical psychology; Psychometrics; Mathematics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.10073757088618243,"score_gpt":0.4637346528502633,"score_spread":0.36299708196408087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994977059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9373621,0.002735436,0.041431185,0.0017701148,0.0013920781,0.00058573385,0.0012836979,0.00046951842,0.012970139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807922,0.00044924644,0.013876432,0.00043072368,0.00045335857,0.0003123056,0.0009468772,0.00017917091,0.0025595643],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9665578,0.0179192,0.0030891153,0.0040555615,0.0074791787,0.00089909526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3895123,0.5016619,0.014433317,0.055615567,0.036437012,0.0023398134],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062840186,0.0019652497,0.0018110443,0.0029066368,0.001255567,0.005162757,0.0044390135,0.0025319806,0.0038954886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4203099,0.0009690523,0.0021076188,0.0021346828,0.002240448,0.0073690894,0.003291213,0.006212325,0.0014417088],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052307923,0.0017766324,0.69350034,0.0005672659,0.0037874805,0.00031512397,0.0015394927,0.00749435,0.0035772696,0.007860696,0.004429656,0.2699209],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018824349,0.0069637448,0.66839397,0.00088641676,0.006249328,0.002640373,0.0021638114,0.18473645,0.026227731,0.08013203,0.019122344,0.0006013933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004189594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066522895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93715984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008868132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027120474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33233458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011841831","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103973","title":"“To the moon, Alice”: Cavalier humor beliefs and women's reactions to aggressive and belittling sexist jokes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"Brock University","keywords":"Joke; Psychology; Knight; Offensive; Amusement; Social psychology; Dominance (genetics); Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05136688931661991,"score_gpt":0.408457573436084,"score_spread":0.3570906841194641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011841831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928427,0.00011042219,0.0000845164,0.00034699228,0.000034809233,0.000016709202,0.000011982815,0.0000052503788,0.0065467767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750155,0.0000851523,0.000080068596,0.00025244043,0.000024564542,0.00002039432,0.000014602531,0.000011673003,0.0020094756],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868816,0.00070866366,0.000044884506,0.00010434766,0.00027334486,0.00018055658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887406,0.006322027,0.00284132,0.00038430552,0.00065660395,0.0010550462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014844143,0.00040106828,0.00028432027,0.0007221479,0.002656251,0.003109502,0.0005143221,0.0018162066,0.0061150095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022713697,0.000390331,0.00018938107,0.0003189727,0.0022159026,0.00085228885,0.0014750838,0.0023609742,0.00068593933],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025485277,0.0011573412,0.2555682,0.0002686697,0.00019661247,0.001990879,0.6894288,0.00017530272,0.022430409,0.0027512617,0.0024420538,0.021041838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009378945,0.0005869079,0.52457017,0.00013774236,0.000102018195,0.0014025926,0.4628196,0.0003470149,0.0016648949,0.0012129458,0.00698918,0.00007309703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045491853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008103927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061150095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006982091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000589914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02045679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095810629","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104060","title":"A creative destruction approach to replication: Implicit work and sex morality across cultures","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis; University of California, Irvine; Universidad del Rosario; Memorial University of Newfoundland; Ben-Gurion University of the Negev; University of Pennsylvania; Loughborough University; Universiteit Gent; American University of Sharjah; University of Birmingham; University of the Punjab; Universiteit van Amsterdam; University of Southampton; Universidad de La Laguna; University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; Slovenská Akadémia Vied; De La Salle University; Zhejiang University; Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond; Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan; Jan Wallanders och Tom Hedelius Stiftelse samt Tore Browaldhs Stiftelse; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Athlone Institute of Technology; University of Queensland; Trinity Western University; Aarhus Universitet; KU Leuven; Singapore Management University; Indiana University Southeast; Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse; University of Alberta; Universität zu Köln; Boston College","keywords":"Religiosity; Morality; Psychology; Social psychology; Replication (statistics); False positive paradox; Replicate; Epistemology","score_opus":0.1745882555843457,"score_gpt":0.49423872904555677,"score_spread":0.31965047346121106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095810629","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15209071,0.005098496,0.765322,0.025135435,0.007459289,0.018023614,0.00048446,0.0011548739,0.025231123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6368009,0.0010345029,0.32249567,0.0058188685,0.0010451522,0.028932106,0.00025446585,0.0003034717,0.003314913],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.42168722,0.462736,0.029217951,0.025669029,0.057709485,0.0029803684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16812544,0.46898878,0.044130992,0.2624608,0.05446851,0.0018255446],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.53004014,0.0023403408,0.0038562792,0.004572785,0.0048612314,0.008010698,0.0065215323,0.0051387064,0.0033390867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8069375,0.0023995496,0.003934611,0.0030172407,0.025044793,0.014057334,0.009141877,0.0066397353,0.0010258816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007914562,0.00230576,0.103231266,0.011319709,0.009159167,0.004036763,0.13011323,0.006609317,0.011163901,0.28031537,0.01388053,0.41995043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004150344,0.008048695,0.060294174,0.009586242,0.0043774853,0.0028946328,0.028950946,0.04639715,0.019486481,0.7533778,0.06114201,0.0012939181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039733625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003515388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46995986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034793778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008358367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5795442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3100848500","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2020.104083","title":"Recognizing the Impact of COVID-19 on the Poor Alters Attitudes Towards Poverty and Inequality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Attribution; Inequality; Psychology; Economic interventionism; Opposition (politics); Recession; Economic inequality; Government (linguistics); Social psychology; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Demographic economics; Development economics; Economic growth; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.17024120506555385,"score_gpt":0.4771280719428196,"score_spread":0.30688686687726574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3100848500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955674,0.000032207976,0.0000413216,0.0005071779,0.000011411159,0.0000025073873,0.000012600778,9.1670205e-7,0.0038245479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991412,0.000032284315,0.000048410544,0.00010994829,0.0000046127475,0.0000029519613,0.000008378791,9.774257e-7,0.0006511659],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994318,0.00025981842,0.000016145998,0.00004254756,0.00009713215,0.00015253731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998164,0.00061619864,0.00042811208,0.000102243015,0.00013191429,0.0005574366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009161928,0.00009032689,0.00017832691,0.0002519075,0.0009329648,0.0014203158,0.00015693656,0.0005499565,0.0059753717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033992492,0.00011084452,0.00013578596,0.00018549987,0.0007286074,0.00043682737,0.0010999019,0.001070674,0.00022531986],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028141832,0.00435974,0.8839886,0.00009525453,0.00011468148,0.00037034397,0.010434353,0.00041108753,0.022021554,0.008145897,0.0023073042,0.064936966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003075898,0.0007840387,0.9801603,0.000023610686,0.000032224834,0.00008224954,0.011514631,0.0004270742,0.0022593844,0.0019801348,0.0026933823,0.000012150147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048128804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013454882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059753717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047902938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00077427126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01998961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134500005","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104116","title":"Poverty and pain: Low-SES people are believed to be insensitive to pain","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Poverty; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.02994447603823135,"score_gpt":0.36408145697582295,"score_spread":0.3341369809375916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134500005","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894846,0.00041594618,0.00010949419,0.0022455074,0.00003569275,0.0000069095686,0.000013722146,0.0000016814881,0.0076863654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999233,0.00012351864,0.000025367073,0.00029689362,0.000009527087,0.0000021923065,0.000005272403,6.9963625e-7,0.00030354693],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951637,0.00015202827,0.000017726361,0.000034543344,0.00013233194,0.00014690563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816006,0.0004820017,0.0006374986,0.000077175515,0.0002206165,0.00042266725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075972156,0.00015570567,0.0002493906,0.00063151214,0.0017346911,0.001750406,0.00024024765,0.0007755137,0.0030406192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034229415,0.00018281247,0.00017401174,0.0003638368,0.0030123936,0.0009039113,0.0011438375,0.0015538742,0.00017681863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007229051,0.00087411114,0.8512566,0.000118894066,0.00012093048,0.0015251988,0.0959175,0.000079767284,0.004416873,0.009053929,0.0021311948,0.033781998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050233957,0.00022791587,0.8832494,0.00009236382,0.000080244245,0.0014214696,0.102634594,0.00021484819,0.00046563213,0.006922489,0.0046040243,0.00003677937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005658827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062204874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005658827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042489066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055366085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011251807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134602075","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104121","title":"Social pain and the role of imagined social consequences: Why personal adverse experiences elicit social pain, with or without explicit relational devaluation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Devaluation; Psychology; Belongingness; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.042270317675369734,"score_gpt":0.377007740196165,"score_spread":0.3347374225207953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134602075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796392,0.00034840993,0.0021498366,0.0007981695,0.00005691743,0.000047158945,0.00004080356,0.000012569801,0.016906986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989255,0.00011092508,0.0005014084,0.00011709657,0.000011535071,0.000019765324,0.000011769941,0.000006169405,0.00029585607],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990527,0.00033615378,0.0000419932,0.000110344416,0.00028687186,0.0001718075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973482,0.0014383653,0.00046764064,0.00034065786,0.0001245094,0.00028063633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010930201,0.0002901805,0.00027689716,0.00022396746,0.000358804,0.0014061815,0.0004405168,0.00090435834,0.0035163523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007839735,0.00026974882,0.00026168983,0.00012274642,0.0022382522,0.0012119099,0.0014233271,0.0015298547,0.00013719115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008190556,0.0033211303,0.18803538,0.0028437856,0.000578209,0.0040821857,0.049896825,0.002007092,0.55558145,0.0681178,0.0016806403,0.11566497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005540423,0.0024064665,0.89174956,0.0005569523,0.00026188683,0.004297349,0.017862407,0.0041823005,0.02254335,0.05201154,0.003421949,0.0001521707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004121391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007158598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035163523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027144174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040381073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011763334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139719779","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104143","title":"Cultural differences in perceiving transitions in emotional facial expressions: Easterners show greater contrast effects than westerners","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek","keywords":"Psychology; Valence (chemistry); Facial expression; Anger; Perception; Emotional expression; Social psychology; Emotional valence; Social perception; Contrast (vision); Context (archaeology); Developmental psychology; Cognition; Communication","score_opus":0.10067523896946202,"score_gpt":0.4156785369654447,"score_spread":0.3150032979959827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139719779","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984982,0.000034284247,0.00006113413,0.000011349516,0.0000051854845,0.0000022804702,0.000016590639,0.0000011170655,0.0013698175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995104,0.0000372309,0.00008746096,0.000025385443,0.0000035731794,0.0000033365397,0.000025515148,0.0000036253289,0.00030345697],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99987555,0.00003432306,0.000009177677,0.000030236453,0.000029536928,0.000021191508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911827,0.00038219657,0.00022238394,0.0000617127,0.00011225097,0.000103303304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039089983,0.00022570517,0.00011950886,0.00034892347,0.00024927434,0.00068475446,0.00009774523,0.00030692294,0.0037772502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001973501,0.00013928447,0.00013275578,0.00020401768,0.00034729182,0.00034258023,0.00041091535,0.00036013126,0.00022059522],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0041388264,0.00033128264,0.58591765,0.00018933536,0.00035453084,0.00048115023,0.028770106,0.00019764234,0.35280073,0.00097447046,0.00056292466,0.025281373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013800397,0.00007999822,0.9925236,0.000007905614,0.000030233094,0.00012273116,0.0041446527,0.00006369978,0.0027227113,0.00007256624,0.00021128688,0.000006788587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002176813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037192819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0037772502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107301064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007703642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012636125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W315812521","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.04.011","title":"Creation in judgments about the establishment of ownership","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Possession (linguistics); Object (grammar); Social psychology; Psychology; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.22242603654721704,"score_gpt":0.4055484458716488,"score_spread":0.18312240932443175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W315812521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9697353,0.000102811195,0.003856435,0.000477189,0.00004816422,0.000033572935,0.000029397866,0.000015381105,0.025701627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987276,0.000026272879,0.0005552718,0.00003716855,0.000011005239,0.000009491444,0.000027395707,0.00001250371,0.0005932334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685585,0.0011794294,0.00014753845,0.00048594567,0.0009969323,0.0003342274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96719927,0.020070255,0.0057644537,0.0027938448,0.0020148405,0.0021573352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059200954,0.00022681121,0.00032261762,0.00059244165,0.0008630674,0.004323857,0.0006576211,0.001662542,0.0069493246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057947557,0.00065688597,0.00030254907,0.00044633687,0.0029147756,0.0047252285,0.002326165,0.0021261384,0.0003969413],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012490753,0.003139437,0.26116002,0.00071906473,0.00040679768,0.0013677228,0.039833862,0.004372144,0.22287315,0.30534282,0.0040268633,0.14426737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037247187,0.00074324704,0.72072035,0.00012210762,0.000170909,0.000798083,0.009081052,0.014729719,0.020415407,0.22796784,0.00470256,0.00017622663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016864705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014428851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0069493246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008019495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007937699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03130883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163923658","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104162","title":"Assessing implicit attitudes about androgyny","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"University of Washington; Princeton University","keywords":"Psychology; Androgyny; Social psychology; Implicit-association test; Implicit attitude; Perception; Incremental validity; Expression (computer science); Social perception; Predictive validity; Developmental psychology; Test validity; Psychometrics; Masculinity","score_opus":0.0848179238695355,"score_gpt":0.5060859383396841,"score_spread":0.42126801447014856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163923658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99290186,0.000061793704,0.00048097616,0.00006269275,0.000016396547,0.000022242592,0.000024807608,0.0000053171925,0.006423767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956084,0.00014173014,0.0012575979,0.000049814724,0.000015492884,0.00003586631,0.000071972965,0.000009975446,0.0028091178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857473,0.00052664935,0.00010894288,0.00014468445,0.0005329234,0.000112025045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98969144,0.004905959,0.0030599236,0.0007425772,0.0010510175,0.00054905924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024271358,0.0003684642,0.0002771729,0.00056116545,0.00049460866,0.0012514609,0.00028453476,0.00070110924,0.0036636982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015801838,0.00019557675,0.00021734518,0.00027915344,0.0006545247,0.0008447542,0.0008222735,0.0013008999,0.0005201386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025191854,0.003635232,0.8604993,0.0002479014,0.00020271828,0.00016559275,0.009404602,0.0007396404,0.015618663,0.0055035874,0.0005660796,0.100897476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034808018,0.003333464,0.951123,0.00024547084,0.00033045228,0.00095681666,0.0074735875,0.005456258,0.017680034,0.0057450514,0.0072049196,0.00010287297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011855537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002179325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036636982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000363778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006487095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012836039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172656630","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104169","title":"No laughing matter: Why humor mistakes are more damaging for men than women","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.04385843310688879,"score_gpt":0.4142461660958324,"score_spread":0.3703877329889436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172656630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9727051,0.002084908,0.00087444484,0.009055659,0.0002742451,0.00003149141,0.00013786006,0.000031365074,0.014805015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99728584,0.00033091754,0.00018782463,0.00072856905,0.000060157126,0.0000059164718,0.000024272436,0.000024342817,0.0013522091],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979317,0.00071195717,0.00009169751,0.00033255975,0.0005342447,0.00039777547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97891504,0.009913446,0.00585258,0.0010706761,0.0020813458,0.0021668626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019371186,0.00030610414,0.00033212866,0.0006956268,0.0013566731,0.0019168467,0.00049499684,0.0019899823,0.011477309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034583006,0.00034483196,0.000276459,0.0004365135,0.0017767746,0.0021275582,0.00097018114,0.0012984773,0.0016804162],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001823742,0.00050260825,0.82726306,0.00041744893,0.00026698897,0.0016241359,0.027923018,0.0001565184,0.0041939397,0.0027681312,0.010816272,0.12224408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069172886,0.0003355864,0.9436619,0.00044198157,0.00014915106,0.0023368874,0.038086433,0.00032583092,0.0013203729,0.0069325585,0.0062891888,0.000051043433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029520825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053125657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011477309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004488285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088015496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038395464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186295407","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104154","title":"Retrospective and prospective hindsight bias: Replications and extensions of Fischhoff (1975) and Slovic and Fischhoff (1977)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Hindsight bias; Psychology; Replication (statistics); Debiasing; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.14643696357332456,"score_gpt":0.4601383078492517,"score_spread":0.3137013442759271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186295407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76180476,0.01177029,0.17757122,0.005227355,0.0014685632,0.0035187935,0.0034490838,0.00046565384,0.034724228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440535,0.0019421724,0.046221476,0.001424526,0.0007458429,0.000943645,0.0009523273,0.00010786939,0.0036086712],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98666,0.0070652436,0.0010529492,0.0029208267,0.0019808712,0.00032015677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.40214673,0.42397276,0.021271417,0.12034965,0.029873086,0.002386249],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07668934,0.0013289948,0.0015321049,0.0017926559,0.0013828079,0.0028259687,0.0045156106,0.0025383364,0.012673604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37823293,0.00085737486,0.0028940511,0.0019739743,0.0033386506,0.006087185,0.002242562,0.0027059475,0.0015821168],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025271883,0.008084502,0.30580968,0.0030224642,0.0054965373,0.0015498758,0.020232268,0.0108082695,0.009267182,0.17983516,0.017179588,0.41344258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0052616918,0.0050510266,0.31507504,0.0010664685,0.0065809796,0.0026303953,0.005903581,0.064145505,0.013508237,0.55615747,0.023882097,0.0007375013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010115413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057119215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92331064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012144488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002115197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40557683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203886424","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104227","title":"Hate and meaning in life: How collective, but not personal, hate quells threat and spurs meaning in life","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Feeling; Social psychology; Psychology; Prosocial behavior; Hatred; Ideology; Enthusiasm; Politics; Law; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.11762158646030198,"score_gpt":0.3475678058141084,"score_spread":0.22994621935380644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203886424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91365,0.00043048442,0.0044441363,0.004826181,0.00023202082,0.000013132844,0.000031758776,0.00002761775,0.07634467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978321,0.00006623366,0.00041852653,0.00023257972,0.0000108530085,0.0000037829511,0.000009031159,0.000012850148,0.0014140556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993166,0.00029269562,0.000010784962,0.00009750721,0.00013997866,0.00014236632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980287,0.0006186947,0.0003387349,0.00021407877,0.00016341283,0.00063636975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009616953,0.0001671842,0.00015611955,0.00028213466,0.0015756703,0.0029962684,0.00039975194,0.0013189957,0.0052004326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051948503,0.00021044037,0.00019115169,0.00017901584,0.0046135015,0.002344824,0.0017931415,0.0019666597,0.0003668126],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013784653,0.001266202,0.12936959,0.00050100137,0.00027955938,0.0026302366,0.25625888,0.0016925115,0.11547833,0.3494648,0.014623306,0.127057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018509946,0.0009164561,0.45246223,0.0003775089,0.00025835834,0.0024835856,0.13994455,0.005582794,0.01772213,0.3226522,0.057109028,0.0003061312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017159749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034963342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0052004326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007100706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006575321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017397225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W325661287","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.005","title":"The “more is less” effect in equifinal structures: Alternative means reduce the intensity and quality of motivation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Context (archaeology); Equifinality; Social psychology; Set (abstract data type); Quality (philosophy); Association (psychology); Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.2919901744456615,"score_gpt":0.5482748928171859,"score_spread":0.2562847183715244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W325661287","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9733729,0.00013926468,0.009021559,0.0011599675,0.0001928063,0.00007628586,0.000045748453,0.00007151913,0.01591993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840072,0.00007721718,0.013649148,0.0002876004,0.0000590056,0.000082641825,0.000026757252,0.000031838725,0.0017786885],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918574,0.00037116863,0.000042796768,0.0001455181,0.00018580977,0.00006897809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747235,0.0014592959,0.00026192793,0.00039752203,0.00012952146,0.0002793289],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015438735,0.00028870415,0.00040425794,0.00034690666,0.0006208201,0.0009274371,0.00055726414,0.00081714714,0.013414441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005771818,0.00022862718,0.00041097566,0.00024658738,0.0013132154,0.0014918853,0.00089754845,0.0013324318,0.00047374662],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.024822917,0.041186124,0.023820078,0.001655556,0.0006170973,0.00020645683,0.007925263,0.0032065723,0.100451,0.20580444,0.005856498,0.5844481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014623944,0.07042376,0.4153346,0.000757917,0.0022777552,0.0010775101,0.008671556,0.03577996,0.05177246,0.36573732,0.03301744,0.0005258205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042810765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008428689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013414441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031552382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006177842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0448758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220793672","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104328","title":"Dealbreakers, or dealbenders? Capturing the cumulative effects of partner information on mate choice","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Context (archaeology); Adventure; Contrast (vision); Selection (genetic algorithm); Replication (statistics); Statistics","score_opus":0.05428000707463025,"score_gpt":0.41325539133343486,"score_spread":0.3589753842588046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220793672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99299896,0.00018594257,0.0059663514,0.000060908395,0.00000898643,0.0000072296193,0.00013218656,0.000030457144,0.0006089001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949326,0.00010120827,0.004131937,0.000056045385,0.000014709778,0.000008415964,0.00020747606,0.00001342768,0.0005342024],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972206,0.0001088242,0.000010140942,0.00009494187,0.000027713817,0.00003619641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715483,0.001776683,0.0003864022,0.00038528175,0.000055531673,0.00024126485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020083054,0.00030749087,0.0008593942,0.00065801665,0.00020762024,0.0013432021,0.0006723663,0.0009762122,0.0030570247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006976373,0.0005911483,0.00040118437,0.0006652618,0.00023986632,0.0020499309,0.0007980445,0.0008024655,0.00035046917],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015927376,0.00056495896,0.83498836,0.00018244759,0.0009006893,0.00016517275,0.00042156904,0.032498837,0.029348452,0.003749792,0.0011522018,0.09443483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005412392,0.00033969228,0.50789773,0.00003166591,0.00030448873,0.00028697078,0.0003521985,0.480911,0.0023822284,0.006521498,0.0008558444,0.00006252492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027367638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074180155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030570247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019160753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028543547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010621071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224116516","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104340","title":"Concealment stigma: The social costs of concealing","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Psychology; Social psychology; Outgroup; Stigma (botany); Social identity theory; Identity (music); Social discrimination; Social rejection; Social distance; Social group; Social relation; Social issues; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)","score_opus":0.0697461458117795,"score_gpt":0.46359291095028843,"score_spread":0.3938467651385089,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224116516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7910489,0.0019222934,0.018904177,0.019046811,0.00024245089,0.00011910628,0.00019051615,0.000059201284,0.16846655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965077,0.00022485016,0.0013660339,0.00035857767,0.000050460825,0.000017735509,0.000014139198,0.000014245365,0.0014462365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602604,0.002258554,0.00015952767,0.00024753882,0.0009344673,0.0003738185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9482875,0.032702714,0.007211947,0.008737108,0.0018413884,0.0012194338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004741605,0.00037586025,0.00045880314,0.00078191014,0.0013464848,0.0029653006,0.00076546514,0.003173695,0.014351592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05167815,0.00047797366,0.00034291303,0.0005237033,0.0038551455,0.0049888906,0.0021877903,0.002990398,0.0005206704],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025260656,0.0014395291,0.059498813,0.0005602547,0.00018295547,0.0016330873,0.008921667,0.0043646,0.012462851,0.76142853,0.0073969495,0.13958466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044479533,0.0006596917,0.10470556,0.000650401,0.0005421962,0.0044095595,0.0104171345,0.018465795,0.0075666276,0.8302137,0.021737076,0.00018741099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019477385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002063802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014351592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012432815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013226231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048010886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224290336","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104338","title":"Corrigendum to “Does helping promote well-being in at-risk youth and ex-offender samples?” [Volume 82, Pages 307–317]","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Volume (thermodynamics); Social psychology; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.05754038188581601,"score_gpt":0.4024989894860519,"score_spread":0.3449586076002359,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224290336","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004363895,0.0014857379,0.00008838359,0.05776301,0.9365416,0.00003082289,0.0005484824,0.000110964895,0.0033874512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032670933,0.010085937,0.00092389964,0.21241502,0.50119543,0.00049290835,0.0024180214,0.0004777336,0.268724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996933,0.0005019114,0.0004795657,0.00038359547,0.0013236573,0.00037822395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752788,0.00687762,0.0007823934,0.0009800991,0.014773461,0.0013075705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004033472,0.002622824,0.0038338604,0.0039810445,0.0045931004,0.0046841027,0.0036800872,0.009513625,0.117779575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043032188,0.001391358,0.003111427,0.0022174942,0.0019512428,0.0021569089,0.0025473163,0.011139737,0.0653946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006376651,0.000004374032,0.000015840085,0.000024143113,0.0000024447527,0.000022769405,0.0000027708859,0.000005019905,0.000003676794,0.000041473624,0.99846137,0.0014097509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010916764,0.00005519341,0.0033551669,0.00089209503,0.00009758167,0.000244674,0.00014270621,0.0002742143,0.00013628008,0.0013828257,0.99324095,0.00006923022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05194672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08135848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117779575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051555424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071875206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39401197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313201472","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2022.104437","title":"Desired attitudes guide actual attitude change","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attitude change; Psychology; Attitude; Social psychology; Construct (python library); Value (mathematics); Variety (cybernetics); Object (grammar); Work (physics); Positive attitude; Computer science","score_opus":0.1597606748368514,"score_gpt":0.48042118509098825,"score_spread":0.32066051025413683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313201472","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9317312,0.00015647458,0.026755558,0.0004953351,0.000066521985,0.00019993202,0.0011302911,0.00016946065,0.03929523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897483,0.00006275845,0.0078812735,0.00016789426,0.000012193286,0.0001563625,0.00050670776,0.000039620158,0.0014248948],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974375,0.0012975858,0.00014479876,0.00048611537,0.00047194504,0.00016208697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844631,0.008310883,0.0025774215,0.0019782726,0.002115021,0.0005553655],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037378697,0.00040353308,0.00028138436,0.0006846622,0.00053410203,0.0021263023,0.00035626043,0.00065937015,0.005493475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022689931,0.0002353433,0.0005079962,0.00060193776,0.00080013205,0.0014679562,0.00088564324,0.0013721857,0.0009659275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068253296,0.0008112054,0.83089864,0.00052692037,0.0002295979,0.000100087556,0.009461417,0.003897637,0.010233685,0.030455932,0.0037685235,0.10893383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007748131,0.000566057,0.9158292,0.0001602909,0.00014762832,0.00014218305,0.003765242,0.017089514,0.0062502916,0.040048383,0.01580179,0.00012194986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002885343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043025347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005493475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008305906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007210101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01976794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319067641","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104457","title":"When more is less: Self-control strategies are seen as less indicative of self-control than just willpower","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Self-control; Control (management); Social psychology; Perception; Perceived control; Ego depletion; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.07386936847370958,"score_gpt":0.45442184443188804,"score_spread":0.3805524759581785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319067641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9335596,0.0012160464,0.004334798,0.0065530194,0.0004317118,0.000045455894,0.00008615785,0.000098257144,0.053675033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964399,0.00016081131,0.0008570564,0.001040099,0.00004117501,0.000017567367,0.00003805151,0.000036967696,0.001368272],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979826,0.00070878223,0.00008160363,0.0002673043,0.0007346919,0.00022494234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938653,0.0022798546,0.0013446014,0.00073264295,0.0007157361,0.0010618995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030782963,0.00034494934,0.0004020318,0.0009468398,0.0008694838,0.0036248013,0.0004610032,0.0010663565,0.0034345423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014476451,0.00023310719,0.00025187797,0.0004612786,0.0034951796,0.0021751637,0.0014128557,0.0020668062,0.00035319288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033796695,0.0030094283,0.41695502,0.00090977154,0.0010586532,0.0011494224,0.0612621,0.00096020976,0.037270848,0.09330865,0.020019293,0.360717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033246152,0.0015868153,0.74671465,0.0006377678,0.0007717918,0.0024176287,0.051394228,0.0029584449,0.014743608,0.14687446,0.031275604,0.00029250895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010243508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012923115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036248013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005419326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006244554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016279757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362716327","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104473","title":"The mind's “aye”? Investigating overlap in findings produced by reverse correlation versus self-report","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Correlation; Psychology; Social psychology; Negative correlation; Positive correlation; Perception; Measure (data warehouse); Social desirability; Computer science; Mathematics; Data mining","score_opus":0.05928821463180299,"score_gpt":0.43475636929001893,"score_spread":0.3754681546582159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362716327","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99406296,0.00037772147,0.0020756621,0.00015455042,0.00003186975,0.000043373788,0.0001073447,0.000015011652,0.0031315554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986975,0.00007104628,0.0007554695,0.00007765811,0.00002451744,0.00004095953,0.000109388566,0.000017848848,0.0002056049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99268943,0.0040560723,0.00059209997,0.0010737492,0.0011869491,0.00040180495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9200948,0.055965923,0.007808713,0.007279874,0.00784412,0.001006601],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015100182,0.00032053684,0.0005275757,0.0019018078,0.000874414,0.002221362,0.0006735971,0.00077258423,0.0017594168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07426131,0.00039760026,0.0004900175,0.00079896476,0.0015865715,0.0017829695,0.0028839512,0.00093499105,0.00036260337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015766808,0.00017569296,0.93613964,0.00021431695,0.00062002306,0.00033860924,0.014247174,0.00011175565,0.019182533,0.0016747585,0.00028575063,0.02543304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059991955,0.00035384911,0.98194516,0.00010519401,0.0002785845,0.001251186,0.00792734,0.0007827012,0.004783514,0.0014252887,0.001061721,0.00002556729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001584826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016891998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015100182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037810137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057473197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07985836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384435981","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104506","title":"Why do people turn to smartphones during social interactions?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Impact of Technology on Adolescents","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Recreation; Social relation; Social psychology; Phone; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.039417867685415116,"score_gpt":0.43353834193171925,"score_spread":0.39412047424630414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384435981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98692673,0.00076210336,0.00037824968,0.0026934538,0.00013865327,0.00002480242,0.000108866945,0.000018262328,0.008948928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972938,0.0005113377,0.00022080689,0.0006126825,0.000030990854,0.000014972998,0.000044896362,0.000009892557,0.0012605451],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99938345,0.00021935237,0.000028713477,0.00008147399,0.0001574291,0.0001296286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956773,0.0019449048,0.0010415835,0.00014909384,0.0005001337,0.00068699557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073327165,0.00021104941,0.00023055902,0.00040435462,0.00062976545,0.002029202,0.00031926722,0.0014742237,0.006191388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011193373,0.0002793904,0.0003132271,0.00021105545,0.0007311977,0.0014012388,0.00055860664,0.0011720641,0.0010691121],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067021145,0.0006572023,0.8014527,0.00048702734,0.00025706962,0.0019615078,0.081798226,0.000090008725,0.011433934,0.0030140325,0.007621074,0.09055698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010083851,0.0004142015,0.75750923,0.00040466787,0.0003177932,0.0021407756,0.21297215,0.00042736717,0.0022719703,0.0023880645,0.02098115,0.000071743874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004027282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071654646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006191388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003029506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003712764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020712316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385678995","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104520","title":"Women exaggerate, men downplay: Gendered endorsement of emotional dramatization stereotypes contributes to gender bias in pain expectations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Empathy and Medical Education","field":"Medicine","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities","keywords":"Exaggeration; Psychology; Social psychology; Dramatization; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.08836965893653523,"score_gpt":0.40428591296775496,"score_spread":0.3159162540312197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385678995","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97964865,0.00011807421,0.00085741014,0.0006375907,0.00007073243,0.000017458184,0.00004966975,0.00000769862,0.01859275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99801993,0.000049508897,0.00020686275,0.00018803749,0.00001987503,0.000010756719,0.000021182905,0.000016315236,0.0014675944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883336,0.00038186426,0.000041274503,0.00016966306,0.00037483958,0.00019896362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959609,0.0015484174,0.00142059,0.00032949037,0.00037790634,0.0003626652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014991194,0.00025186545,0.00017042467,0.00042602245,0.00076431787,0.001865157,0.00028727885,0.00068569486,0.008484903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013066794,0.00032915614,0.00013740927,0.00021103492,0.0013808425,0.0006448049,0.0011046659,0.0008611164,0.00063261815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0048294286,0.0011162171,0.5106749,0.0005079618,0.000338082,0.0027796356,0.17087002,0.0006714105,0.1890899,0.032578558,0.005707316,0.080836564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013443394,0.0005407395,0.92223537,0.00018729475,0.00011492078,0.0017445167,0.046023898,0.000979744,0.01048151,0.008224501,0.009252702,0.0000804285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001645914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021311713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008484903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033131684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046397393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028384805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386552649","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104539","title":"Do reminders of God increase willingness to take risks?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Priming (agriculture); Social psychology; Test (biology); Recreation; Law","score_opus":0.1273355833860818,"score_gpt":0.4918050016996563,"score_spread":0.3644694183135745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386552649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982187,0.00011148216,0.00005527068,0.0006432294,0.000041335938,0.000008548053,0.00002475755,0.000006348794,0.00089034846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989833,0.00010690839,0.00013778186,0.00022892284,0.0000447415,0.00001350062,0.00002433681,0.000004328626,0.0004560757],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994369,0.00030879144,0.000023306477,0.00007979184,0.00007481196,0.00007628218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748444,0.015530942,0.005364561,0.0015724892,0.0003938186,0.002293818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015844875,0.00025999994,0.00047431074,0.00028407696,0.00036165107,0.0007945263,0.00038747204,0.0019812738,0.010930042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02656815,0.000542703,0.00035698002,0.00018667644,0.00072155317,0.0010310742,0.0004362589,0.0023439373,0.00065052137],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.058520686,0.06829987,0.74488556,0.0007733238,0.0016349454,0.0006097671,0.0052427384,0.00075024023,0.019678362,0.0026435922,0.003824031,0.09313683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018967419,0.009129963,0.9792533,0.000095205556,0.0006624717,0.00023803875,0.0015647636,0.0014481934,0.002002099,0.0022951718,0.0013553264,0.000058753812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00079355744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096228084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010930042,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001704822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003952397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03656459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387213251","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104544","title":"Time perspective and helpfulness: Are communicators more persuasive in the past, present, or future tense?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Helpfulness; Psychology; Future tense; Present tense; Persuasion; Perspective (graphical); Past tense; Construal level theory; Psycholinguistics; Social psychology; Linguistics; Cognition; Verb","score_opus":0.09660583453216816,"score_gpt":0.4751921835258672,"score_spread":0.37858634899369903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387213251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98330957,0.00085576257,0.0011173277,0.001634933,0.000048173682,0.000019996145,0.000040648913,0.000011788649,0.0129617425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988312,0.00024318686,0.00037076656,0.00016642334,0.000031989926,0.000009320127,0.000025107385,0.000007967458,0.00031396493],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974758,0.001408823,0.00015385672,0.00033164694,0.00048122404,0.00014858402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95344573,0.028464193,0.01200227,0.0014637983,0.0026559823,0.001968111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004937086,0.00023821645,0.00025944924,0.0012026018,0.0007615166,0.0026916976,0.00028085744,0.0009941085,0.003731357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046000566,0.00030368654,0.00025016387,0.00083378353,0.002218694,0.004158255,0.0013331242,0.0013363272,0.00033481698],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018522677,0.00059351156,0.6129515,0.0010131848,0.0003304445,0.0009169634,0.25287956,0.00017783878,0.018244555,0.011070916,0.0016233111,0.098345965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073127376,0.0005447454,0.925013,0.0002751927,0.00020475427,0.0010193221,0.058976628,0.0005877225,0.0019095528,0.0068709003,0.0044617606,0.00006324991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009947631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015390422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004937086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049214275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047023906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026110113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387762951","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104550","title":"This will not change us: Leader's use of continuity rhetoric to promote collective change","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Team Dynamics and Performance","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Rhetoric; Generalizability theory; Social psychology; Social identity theory; Psychology; Identity change; Collective identity; Perception; Identity (music); Public relations; Social group; Political science; Politics; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.17298501671075903,"score_gpt":0.4237323608211828,"score_spread":0.25074734411042376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387762951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73395735,0.00047527347,0.018369393,0.044053774,0.0015034123,0.00014337646,0.000019983901,0.00035228167,0.20112514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99337703,0.000037293717,0.0024553475,0.0007698427,0.000058934933,0.000029083958,0.000004235528,0.000030205232,0.0032379273],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566686,0.0031526766,0.000069210946,0.00027093614,0.00057325634,0.00026698862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97174317,0.022293353,0.0018072677,0.0014343684,0.0010286645,0.0016931675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009161511,0.0002199282,0.0001715125,0.0007867803,0.0048529594,0.003223846,0.00075264135,0.0025926572,0.0057360358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029025272,0.00025837935,0.00022305537,0.00034817331,0.0033495575,0.0034967163,0.0028963774,0.0028291189,0.00060049206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012262836,0.0026085603,0.031986926,0.00047711356,0.00013575592,0.0015309196,0.35668877,0.0008997327,0.017923435,0.32524064,0.03223635,0.22904563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00180612,0.004832755,0.08168495,0.0010608092,0.0007373503,0.0023487927,0.3005619,0.02494194,0.036805242,0.23123102,0.31371152,0.0002774949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00060975546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00145236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009161511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073567446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019041807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048451304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389004673","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104567","title":"Harnessing dehumanization theory, modern media, and an intervention tournament to reduce support for retributive war crimes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Sheridan College","funders":"","keywords":"Dehumanization; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Tournament; Retributive justice; Criminology; Social psychology; Psychological intervention; Law; Political science; Economic Justice","score_opus":0.08024268852553908,"score_gpt":0.4770215025354717,"score_spread":0.39677881400993265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389004673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95704865,0.00041778764,0.016898148,0.0026772332,0.00020885149,0.0012275685,0.0000440059,0.0002182677,0.02125943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96327114,0.00047307851,0.031973846,0.000530964,0.00007855887,0.001529766,0.000030237275,0.000015240607,0.0020972872],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988379,0.0007243379,0.000038601356,0.00010177039,0.00017394523,0.00012346357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981413,0.00092693756,0.0003426962,0.00015689101,0.00008469498,0.0003475109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001917353,0.00060305063,0.00022498304,0.00078207004,0.0009753801,0.0009669413,0.000604438,0.0005422904,0.004116688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036169635,0.00015989364,0.00027017505,0.00020401708,0.0012716134,0.0009339889,0.0014907959,0.00086171896,0.00023457914],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029243273,0.0723772,0.023142844,0.0014996326,0.00030727443,0.0004371605,0.0073381593,0.0031717946,0.038222134,0.026622392,0.0049846135,0.81897247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01182572,0.18809962,0.31013227,0.002781031,0.0024437213,0.0013387009,0.0260397,0.045481868,0.14357585,0.123448774,0.14436914,0.00046355333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054674293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015643702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004116688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005088627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011958231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013771653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392438439","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104600","title":"(Not) showing you feel good, can be bad: The consequences of breaking expressivity norms for positive emotions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"European Research Council","keywords":"Gratitude; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Perception; Ostracism; Norm (philosophy)","score_opus":0.1368134424627259,"score_gpt":0.4565876971121284,"score_spread":0.31977425464940246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392438439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93169177,0.00014010671,0.006126138,0.0047060493,0.00027096388,0.00005166546,0.00007533492,0.00004910962,0.05688887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708444,0.000037420978,0.001230159,0.0005346146,0.000030573297,0.000041588446,0.000024151586,0.000035587003,0.0009814429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99215615,0.00419227,0.00047119719,0.0006528578,0.0019279311,0.000599493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92996997,0.036968358,0.011617208,0.010747492,0.0064613707,0.00423549],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009526863,0.00022475942,0.00029603613,0.00030290292,0.001460429,0.0026524502,0.00064227433,0.0015478226,0.004656458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06477702,0.00034728323,0.00036113118,0.00018751077,0.0050696675,0.0019138695,0.0021150098,0.0053035724,0.0004942846],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052697225,0.0035699883,0.25354755,0.00071993226,0.0006173601,0.0021861834,0.14037289,0.0025851738,0.08125026,0.3019406,0.010490433,0.19744988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010822887,0.0021908926,0.48510808,0.0005398587,0.0005520532,0.003095269,0.0811409,0.007917057,0.024925182,0.36899847,0.023971353,0.00047859811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017115746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017760533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009526863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005951574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075292075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05038345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392673049","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104604","title":"The influence of dominance and prestige on children's resource allocation: What if they coexist?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Beijing Municipal Social Science Foundation","keywords":"Prestige; Dominance (genetics); Trait; Psychology; Social psychology; Personality; Biology","score_opus":0.05019168972778173,"score_gpt":0.3509815724745811,"score_spread":0.3007898827467994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392673049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941233,0.00035619698,0.00024526205,0.00026831165,0.000011049951,0.0000033707747,0.000053781954,0.000006297514,0.004932541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896634,0.0001865197,0.0002996477,0.00004691464,0.000014093614,0.000006326975,0.000024756086,0.000016286442,0.00043918224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986135,0.0003000811,0.000040187715,0.00019449316,0.00042490248,0.0004268723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886263,0.0054043164,0.0025826353,0.00041097423,0.0006134718,0.002362346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014538836,0.0003461422,0.0007346877,0.0005920832,0.00041787548,0.0025310777,0.0005623193,0.00079340505,0.0038041582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010496676,0.00039797288,0.00021956909,0.0005307212,0.0021224166,0.0011634429,0.0010121496,0.00090279285,0.0002820424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002846519,0.00085174217,0.7302523,0.00038752993,0.00040138216,0.0023307365,0.010764848,0.001183354,0.14195742,0.022185346,0.0015058029,0.08533293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055270026,0.00020113167,0.98914754,0.00004911399,0.00010139591,0.00028406258,0.0026574787,0.00035014248,0.0033614256,0.0028425,0.00091411406,0.000035863988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005438501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013340064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005438501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007527267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012788579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012726128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396571938","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104621","title":"The effect of financial stress on inhibitory control and economic decisions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Cancer Institute; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Psychology; Inhibitory control; Control (management); Social psychology; Stress (linguistics); Finance; Economics; Cognition; Neuroscience; Management","score_opus":0.016576886589881608,"score_gpt":0.3782040225752644,"score_spread":0.3616271359853828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396571938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997162,0.000031677526,0.000026840766,0.0000114357,0.0000017890609,0.0000015941614,0.0000102796375,4.3025386e-7,0.00019968071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99979347,0.000029732184,0.000040735504,0.000010769126,0.0000022037054,0.0000034611244,0.000018185236,5.253999e-7,0.00010102163],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998161,0.00007167556,0.000015601108,0.000028906072,0.00003218954,0.000035483463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983523,0.00066163705,0.00044546416,0.00013413146,0.000063246334,0.00034326783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055074284,0.0002722356,0.00018230245,0.00023065138,0.00024432805,0.0004914154,0.0001279695,0.00019907983,0.0016991962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024508084,0.00012380048,0.00016802066,0.00013349025,0.00044835577,0.0001883201,0.00036208125,0.0004119757,0.00006659188],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0046332353,0.0030280217,0.9293801,0.00008883356,0.00034440478,0.00020787831,0.00096719,0.00042934314,0.026068287,0.00035012973,0.00016880155,0.034333814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012768578,0.00044449733,0.99843055,0.0000035385515,0.000018848199,0.000034547105,0.00011741586,0.00014500169,0.0006291448,0.00010495961,0.000054919772,0.0000037643442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016106333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030374972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0016991962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020060364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021101118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0056844354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398231403","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104631","title":"Endorsing both sides, pleasing neither: Ambivalent individuals face unexpected social costs in political conflicts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Face (sociological concept); Social approval; Social perception; Sociology; Perception; Political science","score_opus":0.07235956591740299,"score_gpt":0.4524705036074812,"score_spread":0.3801109376900782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398231403","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98677886,0.000025034713,0.00033610375,0.0007346181,0.000029255092,0.000007330078,0.000014896126,0.000004987213,0.012068804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990916,0.000011091502,0.00013446437,0.00017311519,0.000010387823,0.0000109793145,0.000012068704,0.000005913516,0.0005504943],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983253,0.0008680298,0.00005577774,0.00017065775,0.0003025259,0.00027770473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889882,0.006007833,0.002287898,0.0006369328,0.0003895035,0.0016896283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001958544,0.00027777662,0.0003217726,0.00050902745,0.0016766422,0.0048677567,0.0004762062,0.0022496649,0.008331766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022304783,0.0005733425,0.00015108658,0.0003434578,0.0015609137,0.002160777,0.0022056093,0.0032793556,0.0007167243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011479173,0.009087169,0.5140508,0.00042472404,0.0004655957,0.006495428,0.06988951,0.008148482,0.11569193,0.1277501,0.017752873,0.11876424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007862872,0.0020500596,0.6342815,0.00013180384,0.0004328537,0.0039459183,0.09962018,0.025916789,0.0065787234,0.21717641,0.0088295285,0.00024992492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006751775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014683127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008331766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041424483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004584597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027872562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401937981","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104667","title":"Race in the eye of the beholder: Decomposing perceiver- and target-level variation in perceived racial prototypicality","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Variation (astronomy); Social psychology; Race (biology); Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.058475782363089986,"score_gpt":0.4293343370990177,"score_spread":0.3708585547359277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401937981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976035,0.000053544667,0.0004687741,0.00004173178,0.000006970117,0.000006365257,0.00005755307,0.0000039767474,0.0017575225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940836,0.000019698402,0.00026096977,0.000025630916,0.000004082361,0.00000434803,0.000046427886,0.000006929564,0.00022361217],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961853,0.00011637452,0.000011220284,0.00008085072,0.00011301748,0.00006003905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982742,0.0007215401,0.00030665458,0.0001972393,0.00029343058,0.00020683947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009275366,0.00015863455,0.00029013984,0.00068154023,0.00061900564,0.0010857536,0.0002551037,0.0005722468,0.0027071137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005694432,0.00015700272,0.00020633609,0.00035633738,0.00039902003,0.0008813294,0.00087375136,0.0005644872,0.00023030768],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027992616,0.00036931544,0.77939767,0.00015526592,0.00028489728,0.00030628455,0.018198267,0.0016286781,0.13664825,0.0048351176,0.0015779716,0.05379896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001252915,0.000062622035,0.9907742,0.00001636934,0.00004843581,0.000095145326,0.0029898605,0.0028201428,0.0016526079,0.0010503487,0.0004595023,0.000018280225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011312127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019184776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011312127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042575164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004128351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022492588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402081257","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104671","title":"Fairness revisionism: Reducing discrimination for the future reduces perceived unfairness in the past","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10353425823996397,"score_gpt":0.46529716116409586,"score_spread":0.3617629029241319,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402081257","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853404,0.0001955306,0.0029976831,0.0015905922,0.00007094697,0.00006151019,0.00001903586,0.000036040514,0.009688233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980046,0.00006685821,0.0012048965,0.000157361,0.000016719225,0.000016671838,0.000009181889,0.0000026661232,0.0005209262],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985442,0.0007288684,0.00004892014,0.00013063947,0.0002911675,0.00025624185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597234,0.0011505418,0.0011019419,0.0005194528,0.00038227643,0.00087343366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004020404,0.00016048644,0.00015228678,0.00032998313,0.0014778543,0.0011341079,0.0004670648,0.00049037405,0.0025847047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010265099,0.00012890359,0.00031744616,0.0001844522,0.001430047,0.0012459524,0.0015698419,0.0009229704,0.0001488883],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009780056,0.0040640943,0.31545025,0.000529914,0.00023501924,0.00028490697,0.043214153,0.001934167,0.010145234,0.020686716,0.0071945074,0.59528303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019131707,0.0024263186,0.913494,0.0005521609,0.00027195583,0.00048349058,0.018244041,0.006636806,0.0062322263,0.025297932,0.026039366,0.00013035646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004092312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063526505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004092312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010321966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023065116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021262228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402120806","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104662","title":"Revisiting the moral forecasting error – A preregistered replication and extension of “Are we more moral than we think?”","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Task (project management); Dishonesty; Social psychology; Replication (statistics); Population; Replicate; Sample (material); Cognitive psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.3172571645618302,"score_gpt":0.4169195394818898,"score_spread":0.09966237492005964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402120806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8901892,0.0017306414,0.070393525,0.008263912,0.0024749532,0.0025315837,0.0012057484,0.0005252952,0.022685148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609424,0.0003654259,0.028974121,0.0020314096,0.0005220142,0.0019332975,0.0005555636,0.00028563512,0.004390082],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96301323,0.018962603,0.0026776688,0.007956485,0.0068127024,0.0005773149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5837368,0.15982378,0.027654234,0.18819226,0.038976733,0.0016162595],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07626791,0.0010776488,0.00091195654,0.0007997097,0.0017982639,0.0024920118,0.0039787535,0.0015075089,0.007177147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2980917,0.0007195014,0.0020169308,0.00072823954,0.004924597,0.0038203944,0.003824558,0.004599235,0.0016360093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00792048,0.0068378528,0.3420165,0.003212703,0.0031371794,0.0013094521,0.07499193,0.0039274474,0.04592932,0.059887473,0.021057721,0.42977196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001307171,0.0074081393,0.7646179,0.0016249531,0.0028054414,0.0014594761,0.013298803,0.01611573,0.068747155,0.056682665,0.06516429,0.000768237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007889749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004671508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9237321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013809373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029329404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4033481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402562418","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104680","title":"Brilliance as gender deviance: Gender-role incongruity as another barrier to women's success in academic fields","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Gender Diversity and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Azrieli Foundation; European Association of Social Psychology","keywords":"Psychology; Deviance (statistics); Social psychology; Gender role; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.13420655461850808,"score_gpt":0.45013361348445435,"score_spread":0.3159270588659463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402562418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99711704,0.00009097053,0.00014384,0.000106095475,0.0000071992954,0.0000062327645,0.000006053136,0.0000016601433,0.0025209356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996232,0.000027296966,0.00007423518,0.000030030273,0.000004405532,0.0000045739257,0.0000059075733,0.0000015298145,0.00022883933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983506,0.0008435822,0.000062286585,0.00016266234,0.00041702838,0.00016385714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921083,0.004106517,0.0023028308,0.00051836856,0.0003314943,0.0006325087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025490653,0.00021661469,0.00028127545,0.00057891855,0.0012199862,0.001800146,0.00044143025,0.00046693799,0.0035911994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013316368,0.00019095532,0.00023661902,0.00032712615,0.0024302956,0.001088932,0.001479804,0.00079500314,0.00016137076],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010817787,0.0006819245,0.832276,0.00018439665,0.00007563517,0.0013318337,0.11035532,0.0001450517,0.016410325,0.0068616644,0.00042537058,0.03017081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002728441,0.0005539286,0.94423133,0.000065223845,0.00003575117,0.0006855249,0.04837609,0.0003992084,0.001661728,0.0019336884,0.0020002045,0.000030035644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022695335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028719914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035911994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048574954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006769697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013480902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403006643","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104682","title":"Ironic effects of prosocial gossip in driving inaccurate social perceptions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Gossip; Psychology; Social psychology; Perception; Social perception; Social norms approach","score_opus":0.020651830359014942,"score_gpt":0.4146937087058569,"score_spread":0.39404187834684196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403006643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98603153,0.00007859483,0.001715543,0.00062201684,0.000033161796,0.000022087821,0.00008919229,0.000017647,0.011390306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992341,0.000019372252,0.00032007485,0.00003818934,0.000010117885,0.000004575116,0.000020957945,0.0000066859384,0.00034591122],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987068,0.0005584141,0.00006103609,0.00019046305,0.00032875684,0.00015453025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9334431,0.05341161,0.005916043,0.0032443022,0.002361213,0.001623613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034895653,0.00036123276,0.00037630126,0.0005365834,0.00056723866,0.0019101087,0.0005468109,0.0016912195,0.009875182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07958703,0.00042123263,0.00019288516,0.00022030178,0.0012160491,0.001060842,0.0009004746,0.0020583516,0.0006344229],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010672359,0.003410138,0.80806816,0.00054135325,0.00040468725,0.0026016869,0.009234502,0.014844602,0.028132075,0.05561235,0.004457858,0.062020306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002600667,0.00080042117,0.9073106,0.0001274296,0.00035165617,0.0007077859,0.0026948997,0.046068307,0.0033674268,0.03666658,0.0015659578,0.00007887347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032347897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009875182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048474813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005287903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033035755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404074520","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104688","title":"Narcissistic vigilance to status cues","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Vigilance (psychology); Social psychology; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.0638718372141827,"score_gpt":0.4692481103150482,"score_spread":0.4053762731008655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404074520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979814,0.000046301862,0.00053191715,0.000035155466,0.00000669176,0.000020143274,0.00002092088,0.000012519035,0.0013449069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981255,0.000065783446,0.00088932295,0.000055418048,0.000007854547,0.000018426346,0.00005153927,0.0000051118855,0.0007811844],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998128,0.000047498226,0.000013256151,0.000047553745,0.000057864934,0.00002111622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867827,0.0004999797,0.00044136713,0.00013566732,0.000102647595,0.0001421197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003935968,0.00021964156,0.00015998528,0.00016195158,0.0001666644,0.0005792431,0.00010739533,0.00023335981,0.003167373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026769852,0.00013992637,0.00011767668,0.0000661944,0.00026732858,0.0002445406,0.00034743705,0.00056748796,0.00019833486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00068165746,0.00031693414,0.08229728,0.00023995178,0.000058501726,0.00020116022,0.0019309603,0.00016690245,0.8938853,0.00050171046,0.00023015981,0.01948951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030043673,0.0017319323,0.9558868,0.00004170586,0.0000331729,0.00035647562,0.00074938295,0.0011911418,0.03820526,0.0007712088,0.000979602,0.000023284732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051049143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010948391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003167373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011189119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014591517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010595858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404369372","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104696","title":"Black racial phenotypicality: Implications for the #BlackLivesMatter Movement","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Zoo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Movement (music); Aesthetics","score_opus":0.07849118908245546,"score_gpt":0.47124914485645614,"score_spread":0.3927579557740007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404369372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.995237,0.00013993123,0.000420202,0.00088196015,0.000018893796,0.000014478421,0.000026482796,0.000003444158,0.0032577163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992828,0.00004940645,0.0002887307,0.00011114004,0.000010000629,0.000017353934,0.000010581754,0.0000038345047,0.00022613873],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974578,0.0013055652,0.00009112372,0.00047415643,0.00047968593,0.00019168643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99119955,0.0032108354,0.0032451241,0.0008903558,0.0006302691,0.00082379876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004580658,0.00031481922,0.00030171173,0.0007756615,0.0022975162,0.0013781099,0.0005920141,0.0003958536,0.004703481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016362453,0.00015247132,0.00029090542,0.0004871847,0.0026852551,0.0014849452,0.002241589,0.00084755564,0.00012280671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000636497,0.0006000412,0.8420167,0.0001504924,0.00016023805,0.00040207384,0.08297288,0.00011074232,0.00571921,0.009413821,0.0008914483,0.05692586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000097634775,0.00019209336,0.96273905,0.00010798669,0.000055030738,0.00018304557,0.032103293,0.00022851497,0.0009217097,0.0018275526,0.0016162022,0.00001575662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008374642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014986854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008374642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057550485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009879007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024225116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406441166","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104717","title":"Gifts that keep on giving: Reflected appraisals from gifts and their role in identity and choice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island; Queen's University","funders":"Smith School of Business, Queen's University","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Identity (music); Social identity theory; Social group; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06643183615533688,"score_gpt":0.46812872443956993,"score_spread":0.40169688828423306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406441166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99014765,0.00018792707,0.0017428997,0.00024473335,0.00001947133,0.000011913783,0.000013865407,0.0000068831196,0.007624709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987399,0.00008854834,0.0008247079,0.00003731854,0.000009673089,0.000006561639,0.000012297326,0.000003232126,0.00027792846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977059,0.0014717577,0.00008364222,0.00012021688,0.00052600546,0.000092560185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991678,0.004165956,0.002073876,0.0007908785,0.0006699889,0.00062133325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057902406,0.00023517259,0.00022410633,0.00042388737,0.00058719225,0.002430234,0.00022182486,0.0005935681,0.002306944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01978435,0.00015603888,0.0003126641,0.00026125656,0.0017289007,0.0015539903,0.0014270806,0.001292937,0.00016115901],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034447873,0.0013419262,0.5322595,0.0010627143,0.00042539006,0.0012958944,0.09703695,0.0028902753,0.093999274,0.06656869,0.0014540316,0.19822058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121045574,0.0015155544,0.91606635,0.000251816,0.00020235007,0.0009025837,0.025246575,0.0026660368,0.012193303,0.033010636,0.007691495,0.00013228745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000521644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047959542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057902406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004933103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034484317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030622065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408126721","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104736","title":"Closets breed suspicion: Environments that stigmatize concealable identities cast doubt on claims to non-stigmatized identities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Criminology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04975786709266505,"score_gpt":0.434607520683141,"score_spread":0.38484965359047596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408126721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8433639,0.00031999047,0.003871462,0.019992763,0.0002208548,0.000034814573,0.000036013662,0.000044122626,0.13211612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99739337,0.00005558799,0.00019898871,0.0008934553,0.00001839354,0.000009621331,0.000005718626,0.000020351583,0.0014043951],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906268,0.0062269424,0.0001320564,0.0005259049,0.0013148632,0.0011734485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972284,0.01630785,0.004144338,0.0033753628,0.0012856069,0.0026028613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072832764,0.0003350395,0.0005118703,0.0013992337,0.013791798,0.012023551,0.0013965294,0.004537932,0.010637771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042448103,0.0006055624,0.00028771494,0.0010096235,0.0267486,0.009169921,0.012053251,0.006663219,0.0009804515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005480059,0.0005950097,0.03185839,0.00011602862,0.00004189046,0.0017234393,0.59772414,0.000246066,0.0042053335,0.3264658,0.009594655,0.026881248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014454518,0.00026995942,0.034811743,0.000403835,0.00008008667,0.0013102791,0.64200664,0.0010620775,0.0030494276,0.27100042,0.04574626,0.00011470769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053604837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055769864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013791798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027247272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030796048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03851807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408350220","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104746","title":"The plurality effect: People are more dishonest toward group than individual targets","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Social psychology; Group (periodic table); Chemistry","score_opus":0.02972474548996858,"score_gpt":0.4168255862079196,"score_spread":0.38710084071795103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408350220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99174047,0.00020115932,0.0014217062,0.00032010593,0.000021494614,0.000022992259,0.00005005427,0.000015520693,0.0062064896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988456,0.000052600928,0.0005230631,0.0001433212,0.000013086203,0.0000145023705,0.000024843459,0.0000059020267,0.00037705668],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951426,0.0020413846,0.0003409972,0.0009810693,0.0012582075,0.00023582586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9447174,0.030844292,0.016182018,0.004877623,0.0016574905,0.0017210913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059470567,0.00032537317,0.00045426286,0.0006415561,0.00092899357,0.0010060051,0.0003042528,0.0005661835,0.006462109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02439056,0.00023586399,0.0003440216,0.0003234112,0.0021560765,0.0011981409,0.0019223768,0.0014135534,0.00027567387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00275374,0.00081493525,0.82650787,0.000717841,0.0006987363,0.0007017059,0.030041443,0.00024108929,0.04958219,0.004499522,0.0011505173,0.08229044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054162367,0.0006117593,0.9849635,0.00007492005,0.00011976632,0.0005464324,0.0051476136,0.00027277684,0.0039227996,0.0028871023,0.0013628922,0.000036283636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007598183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014608658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006462109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028652282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027529933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031451404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409302124","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104755","title":"Exploring the gender-portion association in stereotypes, cognition, and treatment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Association (psychology); Cognition; Social cognition; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.16853446652055554,"score_gpt":0.4364010511062946,"score_spread":0.2678665845857391,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409302124","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866182,0.0021207903,0.0010152273,0.0022422536,0.00010463854,0.00019482961,0.00009308475,0.000008452356,0.007602499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99647564,0.0008759957,0.0010975902,0.00037241195,0.000037971207,0.00030509307,0.000050208724,0.0000034100765,0.0007816064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870527,0.0007438834,0.00006843939,0.00010011099,0.0002091106,0.000173251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983333,0.0007370649,0.00038480654,0.00013639973,0.000121164514,0.0002873112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035552566,0.000117584364,0.00027185353,0.00044439035,0.0008728872,0.00063499267,0.00029901793,0.00036855065,0.0036691467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069757723,0.00009330444,0.0003816483,0.00047782878,0.000836125,0.00062873366,0.0007523101,0.00075608044,0.00019754746],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008862912,0.014550214,0.22866488,0.00077840843,0.00031769226,0.00045092456,0.023652079,0.0005315754,0.00577489,0.010019155,0.004018215,0.702379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002111756,0.025430998,0.84808457,0.0015450467,0.00044391374,0.00071515,0.046983827,0.0019412744,0.007639777,0.03387038,0.031127568,0.000105799365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002309662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064822263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0036691467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015333535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023847544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018802226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410288843","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104761","title":"Third-party punishment, vigilante justice, or karma? Understanding the dynamics of interpersonal and cosmic justice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Karma; Economic Justice; Punishment (psychology); Social psychology; Interpersonal communication; Criminology; Dynamics (music); Law; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.05971262503549638,"score_gpt":0.41737739339719887,"score_spread":0.35766476836170247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410288843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9849358,0.00062208954,0.0036640563,0.0023191585,0.00001836486,0.00000516313,0.000006917272,0.0000060274233,0.008422408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994355,0.00009294383,0.00025976537,0.000070374335,0.0000045283273,0.0000018560185,0.0000019601855,0.0000010772505,0.00013206065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935967,0.0003619718,0.000019936397,0.00008167533,0.00007153231,0.0001053373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99706215,0.0012616124,0.00092350144,0.00026724604,0.00015167378,0.00033378205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014964987,0.00017452851,0.00023693776,0.0004560552,0.000523944,0.001728287,0.000334104,0.00062402256,0.0014734722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007502432,0.00012602446,0.00020244672,0.00023376508,0.0044052857,0.0035773062,0.0009899173,0.0010340584,0.00008086725],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007687728,0.0007675095,0.44666156,0.00036704965,0.0002686753,0.00064802484,0.082901925,0.0025681038,0.011160523,0.25890768,0.0015180791,0.193462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044119013,0.0003539807,0.6893209,0.00020943921,0.00008905505,0.0004627976,0.052086983,0.01098385,0.0013165401,0.23917742,0.0058757677,0.00007919376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002273917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049312324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002273917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069188926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005976056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007914305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411225961","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104780","title":"Testing the effects of political rhetoric towards muslims as a facilitator and barrier for intergroup contact","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"UK Research and Innovation; Toronto Metropolitan University","keywords":"Facilitator; Rhetoric; Psychology; Politics; Social psychology; Political science; Linguistics; Law","score_opus":0.03717007345953543,"score_gpt":0.4250842991449416,"score_spread":0.3879142256854062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411225961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99850106,0.000020324293,0.0001175844,0.00003184159,0.0000069336334,0.00003885866,0.00000879164,0.0000023790742,0.0012721674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982066,0.00004185573,0.00067453255,0.000038800958,0.000009793975,0.000113028145,0.00002314645,0.0000037331688,0.0008885487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789834,0.0012565716,0.00008386812,0.0002782292,0.00028268265,0.00020036945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97050256,0.023673723,0.0028826878,0.00080694456,0.0005407138,0.0015932898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034120346,0.00043496414,0.0002897042,0.00036550532,0.0007768361,0.0013225481,0.00048746017,0.0006517128,0.005568739],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014905706,0.00029430992,0.00039356638,0.00014664186,0.0011718749,0.0007268926,0.00092102285,0.0013594403,0.00039986378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.030135209,0.08613958,0.47021493,0.0018414791,0.00061441935,0.00070122,0.059245437,0.0011102163,0.23960218,0.010030069,0.00070846616,0.099656895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008788047,0.061720233,0.86604786,0.00019408438,0.0008120731,0.00023575497,0.0150111085,0.0030503334,0.046469256,0.0027080749,0.002767536,0.000104780185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008054613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013402444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005568739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050717295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008546371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018629313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412764321","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104805","title":"What types of gratitude expressions promote prosocial behavior?: A registered report","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Gratitude; Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.06112815240159746,"score_gpt":0.46304660730537106,"score_spread":0.4019184549037736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412764321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974437,0.00010708673,0.00030429725,0.00012300901,0.000019544821,0.0000973253,0.00011296405,0.00001374733,0.0017784863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99599034,0.00023146646,0.0013142225,0.000105070794,0.00003251302,0.00033339628,0.00014683802,0.000012290845,0.0018337679],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927205,0.0003226492,0.00006872894,0.00012976036,0.00015755858,0.00004922556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934465,0.003234182,0.0015693852,0.00070472807,0.0005472487,0.00049781986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023126176,0.00018148142,0.00031557496,0.00020995254,0.00055909937,0.00081306824,0.0002501207,0.00038085654,0.0057916543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010486983,0.00024104264,0.00029817643,0.00015484868,0.0004335073,0.0006550146,0.000760559,0.000697942,0.0005488406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.009463415,0.014087915,0.54092246,0.0017127002,0.0004035113,0.0005189184,0.041940864,0.0003360696,0.08126128,0.0020019894,0.0066261766,0.3007246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019643788,0.0072706845,0.96485037,0.00014354908,0.00019789304,0.00029002773,0.008627883,0.00043984075,0.01130278,0.0004721517,0.0061514187,0.00005686978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043266095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011326111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057916543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020253399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033430915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019375026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413120078","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104813","title":"Power as a moral magnifier: Moral outrage is amplified when the powerful transgress","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Connaught Fund; Canada Foundation for Innovation","keywords":"Outrage; Psychology; Social psychology; Power (physics); Moral disengagement; Political science; Politics; Physics; Law","score_opus":0.047382275117104404,"score_gpt":0.42444101164632636,"score_spread":0.37705873652922195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413120078","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6951341,0.00029670278,0.010519293,0.014045344,0.0006299348,0.000045345096,0.000030377858,0.00009253875,0.27920637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951787,0.000028142293,0.0006544175,0.0005040098,0.000037569698,0.000014680675,0.000005959806,0.00002756851,0.0035489327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623245,0.0016705842,0.000069902635,0.00036796147,0.0011268315,0.00053226843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864921,0.0064169886,0.0019522922,0.0017859893,0.0011355357,0.0022170735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036090757,0.00032351512,0.0003435837,0.0006165087,0.003943159,0.005359932,0.0008478646,0.003109972,0.012136349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030885015,0.00035488585,0.0002493195,0.0003323881,0.008676909,0.0062962594,0.0049898657,0.0061837407,0.00089624134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013365018,0.0009127145,0.017686542,0.00025993315,0.00010997029,0.002973745,0.13347992,0.0011542481,0.03270985,0.7307991,0.01340488,0.06517253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002428036,0.0007539469,0.03675956,0.00024257723,0.00017523713,0.002747636,0.10051532,0.008448223,0.011066438,0.7853147,0.053527843,0.00020571916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006909997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000808129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012136349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008689964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016536477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04060012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413398945","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104808","title":"The do-gooder dilemma: A self/other asymmetry in the perceived emotional costs of self-reporting good deeds","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Cornell University","keywords":"Psychology; Dilemma; Social psychology; Self-disclosure; Social desirability; Asymmetry; Self-deception; Social perception; Perception; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03327892825533028,"score_gpt":0.42373644208177735,"score_spread":0.39045751382644706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413398945","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98679084,0.00013901082,0.0015372832,0.0008857086,0.00003481447,0.000017110295,0.00003734186,0.0000053403674,0.010552538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992267,0.000030743184,0.0003874965,0.000116360636,0.000017484492,0.0000065830372,0.000015372052,0.0000046953523,0.00019450832],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979625,0.00096481823,0.00012030607,0.00021282167,0.0006173152,0.00012230554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9775194,0.012076946,0.006435892,0.0014532437,0.0009280318,0.0015864803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005464346,0.0002602472,0.0003223781,0.000858101,0.00059689203,0.002134441,0.00035033206,0.0013372711,0.0048413556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03585647,0.00030216685,0.0001777138,0.00027171517,0.0018224743,0.0028926574,0.0015771923,0.0020330565,0.00019610091],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007822988,0.0022183591,0.60076654,0.0006148777,0.00074581895,0.0027099927,0.04532749,0.0034106488,0.0961787,0.13116784,0.0041026967,0.10493403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024061669,0.0008778239,0.8704195,0.00020137762,0.00022346854,0.0029446385,0.024397492,0.0066755316,0.0037820127,0.086577214,0.0034846189,0.00017568824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048985454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007854125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005464346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041368091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034112995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028898537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415665342","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2026.104961","title":"Persuasion via Intermediaries: The Pull of Extremity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Persuasion; Intermediary; Preference; Position (finance); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03934867242396043,"score_gpt":0.45260019458505224,"score_spread":0.4132515221610918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415665342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7800129,0.0008397403,0.063716054,0.0038770402,0.00017883809,0.00015384496,0.0003176324,0.00025129702,0.15065272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925851,0.00014605827,0.0044089253,0.000109737506,0.00007206644,0.000027691769,0.00003531551,0.000059280123,0.0025558681],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973706,0.0009595337,0.00012575471,0.00053520635,0.0007715174,0.00023733616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9583525,0.031021865,0.0029133253,0.0040409076,0.0022084226,0.0014628661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004112491,0.0004996493,0.0006738089,0.0018371956,0.0011377014,0.008376456,0.00082820933,0.002618209,0.01609138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043171555,0.0008572519,0.0005738225,0.0008516666,0.0023016285,0.008882288,0.0028666884,0.0028404412,0.001817854],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001530896,0.00077055034,0.05763406,0.0005613486,0.00030308313,0.0008737189,0.012851063,0.0046977345,0.039707985,0.73896587,0.0021744913,0.13992928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003600898,0.0008036161,0.089274004,0.00032782168,0.00061784673,0.0014395613,0.006862316,0.03967568,0.014018496,0.83735573,0.009025976,0.00023890195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066269806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041394107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01609138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00058955094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008228873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05383104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416319964","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104851","title":"Individuating rather than group information dominates evaluations of members from newly learned social groups","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Action Observation and Synchronization","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Université Catholique de Louvain","keywords":"Impression formation; Perception; Salient; Social perception; Social cognition; Cognition; Dominance (genetics); Social group; Group (periodic table)","score_opus":0.05589216525606449,"score_gpt":0.42794776317710165,"score_spread":0.37205559792103715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416319964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99645704,0.000039890765,0.00068082573,0.000031301486,0.0000084323,0.000006386358,0.0000097558905,0.00000837896,0.0027579085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99922454,0.000026410988,0.00022962716,0.000015311405,0.000011383917,0.0000036328358,0.00003241928,0.000013038875,0.00044354884],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988493,0.00030526763,0.0000434152,0.0002180073,0.00045254471,0.00013138667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864759,0.008200906,0.0023141645,0.0007266674,0.0007795673,0.0015028387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001698137,0.00036816226,0.0004973239,0.00062046107,0.0003819721,0.0014536559,0.00032571238,0.0007517594,0.004037121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013655237,0.00023806436,0.00020981186,0.00028805638,0.00066501717,0.0010316549,0.00096044707,0.0008084506,0.00035721576],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00851661,0.0010254091,0.60028315,0.00041570005,0.00052549684,0.00035060846,0.0049348557,0.006966417,0.2043356,0.007579935,0.0012024969,0.1638638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006252382,0.0011915873,0.9788953,0.000016461532,0.000117916934,0.00009233419,0.0011106831,0.007174701,0.006237154,0.0046387496,0.0004339318,0.000028641356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001037469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023885872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004037121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052254373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004105821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013505459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416345862","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2025.104847","title":"A longitudinal test of the effectiveness of four interventions to reduce discrimination","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","topic":"Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Context (archaeology); Intervention (counseling); Test (biology); Component (thermodynamics); Cognitive bias","score_opus":0.08641408758137174,"score_gpt":0.4718893835262133,"score_spread":0.38547529594484153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416345862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99737513,0.0003368308,0.00036723528,0.00010907944,0.00005276372,0.00036281045,0.00029201809,0.000027134105,0.0010769406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937483,0.00027331084,0.0011374711,0.0002018607,0.00005118363,0.0009535893,0.0007608588,0.000009199519,0.0028642677],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833065,0.00058152876,0.00015992821,0.00033724032,0.00038628012,0.00020434325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98407894,0.0069561508,0.0030310184,0.002053566,0.001740418,0.002139865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006522305,0.00050293654,0.00090697483,0.00056732056,0.0009628765,0.0006088925,0.0007084966,0.0010134175,0.0034451054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013560147,0.00034460195,0.00084049045,0.00034708728,0.0005445233,0.0009766718,0.00060610403,0.001612318,0.000631408],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.105857834,0.30828997,0.23037559,0.0009818873,0.0027462796,0.00028319712,0.0027154717,0.0017422768,0.024377385,0.0007346709,0.0032747686,0.31862068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005860985,0.51366484,0.45973554,0.00011092037,0.00087824266,0.0001341768,0.0004579189,0.0017159028,0.013148409,0.00051662786,0.0036749863,0.0001014196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019692397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022343167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006522305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004674902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013736986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034493625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}