{"meta":{"query_hash":"bf5458bd50ef","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bf5458bd50ef","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Family+Theory+%26+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1491113523","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12051","title":"Fathering, Feminism(s), Gender, and Sexualities: Connections, Tensions, and New Pathways","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Gender studies; Human sexuality; Sociology; Disadvantaged; Feminist theory; Feminist philosophy; Narrative; Variety (cybernetics); Diversity (politics); Race (biology); Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.11024366578309136,"score_gpt":0.3405313428726745,"score_spread":0.23028767708958314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491113523","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0459834,0.7871075,0.0051507745,0.073491134,0.0013068571,0.000030432899,0.000033043798,0.000015282176,0.086881615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5798819,0.4053501,0.0023786197,0.0048063854,0.0010809577,0.00006681455,0.000023389557,0.00002645248,0.006385276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954129,0.0035637887,0.00011966752,0.00025816256,0.00040595932,0.00023963413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920752,0.006726936,0.00043033814,0.00014462357,0.00039675622,0.00022608902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008473913,0.00041634165,0.00078024925,0.002459193,0.003561795,0.0060974434,0.00078659743,0.0016212033,0.0030705198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006704324,0.00030532447,0.00021733501,0.0030786244,0.02092974,0.010601984,0.0038034548,0.002463595,0.00022111258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040957337,0.000038856924,0.0044587087,0.0010904695,0.000023309318,0.00087401853,0.12857147,0.000085547086,0.00016187898,0.7395116,0.0036686044,0.1214746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014540422,0.00009468416,0.009292498,0.005579748,0.000027994593,0.0024612744,0.2910637,0.00013415024,0.0002561854,0.2989535,0.392083,0.00003873742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004358579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007203292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008473913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025651495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032819659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044814885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573911538","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12037","title":"Cultivating the Family Studies Terrain: A Synthesis of Qualitative Conceptual Articles","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Scholarship; Contemplation; Sustainability; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Conceptual framework; Engineering ethics; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Ecology; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.5350695537336045,"score_gpt":0.6038345834614222,"score_spread":0.06876502972781762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573911538","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15736282,0.4380102,0.20549117,0.11359213,0.0067734537,0.022507181,0.007523118,0.000310661,0.048429295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4756439,0.31271973,0.15891118,0.015639924,0.0008517956,0.030450713,0.001771545,0.00037756484,0.0036336505],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.92166716,0.06048045,0.007860351,0.002071552,0.006444657,0.0014759067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7590216,0.21245687,0.0075920536,0.0032999911,0.01648701,0.0011425224],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11088783,0.0010789201,0.0026631763,0.021474324,0.0056699943,0.009264927,0.002538178,0.0024565016,0.0031762873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1900995,0.0010091196,0.001258287,0.025698792,0.0066693737,0.011721273,0.007243636,0.0024104374,0.00036654604],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021153144,0.000062638515,0.0025409,0.07593916,0.0002750376,0.0012159533,0.70180196,0.00083643076,0.0018665056,0.06386351,0.012956742,0.13842961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005361291,0.000082412946,0.002422049,0.11367625,0.00036256024,0.00067773816,0.6628607,0.0006459047,0.0010610059,0.025978848,0.19209252,0.00008641334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047390154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0082922615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8891122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013680185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025421543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58643794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810419649","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12038","title":"Is Marriage Individualized? What Couples Actually Do","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Psychology; Key (lock); Empirical examination; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Social science; Actuarial science; Computer security","score_opus":0.02663252746026722,"score_gpt":0.3354357102804068,"score_spread":0.3088031828201396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810419649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43425307,0.4099818,0.012252206,0.06044025,0.0014418481,0.000076971744,0.00035910364,0.00004022474,0.08115449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8947185,0.09802463,0.0012976248,0.0034627377,0.00035699917,0.00003209374,0.00009443568,0.0000068512923,0.0020060781],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975073,0.0015562344,0.00014398046,0.0002492364,0.00036004643,0.00018319268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968369,0.0016467795,0.00077462924,0.00023314594,0.00027522416,0.00023321623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035326923,0.0001201713,0.000663446,0.0007177161,0.0010220556,0.0024141772,0.0005749648,0.0011327934,0.0019460698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011132806,0.00014575009,0.00021591174,0.0014074302,0.0033217552,0.0041034897,0.001318202,0.0008959177,0.0002840366],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120016855,0.0001177612,0.11126239,0.0022678825,0.00029938974,0.0016059609,0.102736965,0.0004457256,0.00046321837,0.15339226,0.007701323,0.61958706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003328125,0.00045191997,0.15922277,0.005472158,0.00044848907,0.008524736,0.21316384,0.00073746545,0.0009705109,0.28282538,0.32797354,0.00017593526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035177225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003906653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035326923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007263297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013534422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018682897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905461277","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12041","title":"Exploring Revenge as a Feature of Family Life","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Perspective (graphical); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Feature (linguistics); Family life; Sociology; Computer science; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.1511271999377534,"score_gpt":0.3876464154251166,"score_spread":0.23651921548736318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905461277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21078938,0.71667695,0.020986483,0.02276005,0.0008690463,0.0001395542,0.00008689696,0.000021363403,0.027670244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77119017,0.21869981,0.006391211,0.0021533514,0.00046193122,0.000119562996,0.00006347473,0.000009737359,0.00091066933],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99433774,0.004346216,0.0002506071,0.00028253926,0.00057976163,0.00020313096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691269,0.025405083,0.0036020014,0.0006951539,0.0007657016,0.00040525626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096018175,0.00034912623,0.0007912642,0.0021482552,0.0018376943,0.004435157,0.0010470838,0.0024413248,0.0010821729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020005854,0.0002201653,0.0005706308,0.001857861,0.009608721,0.009359546,0.0036706633,0.0028329676,0.000111706555],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023851833,0.00021609713,0.03137774,0.014606836,0.0002746416,0.005079453,0.3557898,0.00061303884,0.003626789,0.25463593,0.003313603,0.33022758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003905833,0.0011055309,0.08970249,0.019836744,0.00027510367,0.05853342,0.36451262,0.00054827554,0.0033621583,0.15328857,0.30851483,0.00028123622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010178069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017791189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0096018175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001284529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00200104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05077988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1927404402","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12084","title":"Theoretical Triangulation as an Extension of Feminist Intersectionality in Qualitative Family Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Triangulation; Oppression; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Privilege (computing); Epistemology; Viewpoints; Qualitative research; Gender studies; Computer science; Social science; Politics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6847794256008514,"score_gpt":0.6918430938881255,"score_spread":0.007063668287274116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1927404402","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026154414,0.003334402,0.8783012,0.01637638,0.0007488045,0.011609506,0.0005700152,0.0001388362,0.06276657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30690354,0.0024696088,0.6205986,0.0038696206,0.00016727325,0.05975219,0.00046266257,0.00019259681,0.005583861],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6812257,0.28992632,0.0073539363,0.006683417,0.012448819,0.0023618154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77863824,0.16624258,0.007590275,0.025352448,0.02019236,0.0019840905],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20512515,0.0011127573,0.0024300884,0.01078789,0.014197291,0.008972941,0.0047673583,0.0032995688,0.009920426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1739655,0.0017158256,0.0018575081,0.01032884,0.030612033,0.014821375,0.026923886,0.0046023186,0.0011221723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007568523,0.000070789145,0.0014265986,0.0018330411,0.00005243058,0.0005984269,0.4505814,0.00051633554,0.0005608784,0.48985144,0.0029425325,0.051490407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018712616,0.0001408596,0.0013641934,0.0067303525,0.00010238865,0.0009434981,0.23788187,0.0026479359,0.0015085773,0.5876777,0.16069286,0.00012260009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007107417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009925378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79487485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011347348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022812637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9802222},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989919133","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00027.x","title":"Reconceptualizing Parent‐Adolescent Relationships: A Dialogic Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Dialectic; Meaning (existential); Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Meaning-making; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14432824080675954,"score_gpt":0.37730585244007975,"score_spread":0.2329776116333202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989919133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11570198,0.038218625,0.3107681,0.09024436,0.00095176714,0.0006253006,0.00017971908,0.00048011588,0.44283012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93451476,0.010369893,0.0420273,0.0017018118,0.00017343726,0.0005020156,0.00005185221,0.000051629177,0.010607196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603397,0.003054479,0.00009073662,0.00019920303,0.00039953744,0.00022205884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713564,0.0018243494,0.00028871265,0.00010553355,0.00018473469,0.0004609694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050365934,0.00048521085,0.00040398823,0.0019745051,0.0034844042,0.008331393,0.0024780852,0.0033084906,0.0027265367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052703777,0.00036661557,0.00053701346,0.0015107695,0.009632401,0.007912946,0.004569065,0.003663792,0.00043212637],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017123222,0.00007564672,0.0008153358,0.00019136039,0.0000141572,0.00096750364,0.10235742,0.0011136216,0.00027884572,0.867616,0.002170188,0.024382873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006523958,0.00012519877,0.00169834,0.0010084235,0.00005762366,0.0023645165,0.08913589,0.008778021,0.00036008263,0.7439995,0.15236281,0.00004442233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035014118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029621627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008331393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038886818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072018327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028214514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044039676","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00127.x","title":"Interview and Memoir: Complementary Narratives on the Family Ties of Gay Adults","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Narrative; Psychology; Family ties; Qualitative research; Narrative inquiry; Strengths and weaknesses; Developmental psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Sociology; Genealogy; Art; History; Social science","score_opus":0.06340715989634746,"score_gpt":0.34791136437123793,"score_spread":0.28450420447489044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044039676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8024524,0.022121258,0.05458557,0.00984625,0.001137522,0.0044248183,0.005204743,0.00024750808,0.09997994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8651375,0.01725406,0.06855134,0.0023852072,0.00030536036,0.006374094,0.0012933824,0.00014409561,0.03855488],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99453497,0.004517546,0.00028922813,0.00018795341,0.0003144117,0.00015580638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98877674,0.00809589,0.0011305981,0.0008157516,0.0008740985,0.00030679707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065690116,0.00090419035,0.0005768184,0.0026109768,0.0028857917,0.0015204058,0.000995782,0.001441332,0.0042688446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015152936,0.00047084907,0.00023066325,0.0027919477,0.0020510724,0.0024943228,0.0031161518,0.0012443205,0.00083545846],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013476983,0.000057366768,0.0013244104,0.0012456797,0.000011222975,0.0018254609,0.9301519,0.000106806896,0.0040838583,0.0050940826,0.0057409327,0.050223622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021727219,0.00016170192,0.005222994,0.0016840185,0.000016641228,0.0032455258,0.7718177,0.00017672994,0.002977352,0.0027492957,0.21187864,0.00004764299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001636409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059757084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0065690116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012091185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017284589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034740686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047395470","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00117.x","title":"Qualitative Action‐Project Method in Family Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Action research; Data collection; Meaning (existential); Qualitative research; Protocol (science); Psychology; Social psychology; Qualitative property; Applied psychology; Computer science; Psychotherapist; Sociology; Social science; Medicine; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.42146857347999356,"score_gpt":0.6144062837526024,"score_spread":0.19293771027260886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047395470","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037474826,0.0019346473,0.81099886,0.0043418454,0.0008690359,0.07948384,0.0030984082,0.00073821045,0.061060324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.112882406,0.0009388692,0.7176055,0.0014443581,0.000061100574,0.15547381,0.00062138843,0.00015435531,0.010818171],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92955106,0.06411241,0.0012299636,0.001922445,0.0024452538,0.0007387999],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95638657,0.03372576,0.0011123554,0.004235638,0.0036487374,0.0008908905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05858407,0.0010456906,0.0010004916,0.0030396436,0.004439983,0.002680217,0.003503006,0.0013767115,0.018386284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03177953,0.0008819918,0.0008294142,0.004136849,0.005727468,0.001975776,0.0066605057,0.0030717638,0.00231623],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008126301,0.0015874855,0.00349791,0.0070637655,0.00013341299,0.00059909705,0.16986053,0.0040918835,0.0067304033,0.22541122,0.040558737,0.539653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018632946,0.001385995,0.0059886007,0.0049122954,0.00013108859,0.0010535842,0.12542646,0.009773884,0.011306046,0.2152277,0.62258625,0.00034481855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038956718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072326544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05858407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039871144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010761085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3098259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094245575","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00031.x","title":"Religion and Family Links: Neofunctionalist Reflections ‐ by Donald Swenson","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03670875847588364,"score_gpt":0.383692325613082,"score_spread":0.34698356713719836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094245575","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015567001,0.41497022,0.0004989537,0.56694615,0.009980069,0.0000045477277,0.000023355053,0.0000053641575,0.0060146227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09392394,0.6066293,0.0014847484,0.25758556,0.021526182,0.000049961996,0.00005309812,0.000050056242,0.018697122],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989262,0.0006737959,0.00003627475,0.00010365803,0.00019685569,0.0000630948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993512,0.0054632155,0.00013637735,0.00012588593,0.00054378546,0.00021884928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048498837,0.00048340604,0.00062756566,0.0014021565,0.002259401,0.0029735477,0.0011965238,0.0036129532,0.0030377007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007429554,0.00026448662,0.00026264694,0.0016955255,0.0073268623,0.008538985,0.0024711874,0.007741862,0.00060696335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099393845,0.00009351401,0.0009916533,0.00083472865,0.000048246548,0.000283846,0.010878279,0.00023273272,0.00013244533,0.21980365,0.66001725,0.1065843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019046463,0.000014464163,0.0008275447,0.0012956951,0.00001807329,0.0003722172,0.0055294405,0.00010781751,0.00010378948,0.07289512,0.91879565,0.000021104603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00739223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013073079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00739223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021680251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020831106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025648952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097123728","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00039.x","title":"The Deinstitutionalization of Marriage Revisited: A New Institutional Approach to Marriage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Conceptualization; Institution; Institutionalism; Sociology; Positive economics; Criminology; Political science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.029863716397236367,"score_gpt":0.3115397114504248,"score_spread":0.2816759950531884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097123728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28565103,0.108965024,0.14809121,0.12377343,0.0012180663,0.00013292128,0.00011017863,0.00010429027,0.33195373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97893447,0.012680795,0.0044967225,0.0014423983,0.00056132674,0.000058190413,0.000015649584,0.000009676819,0.0018007753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474853,0.003532868,0.00018902984,0.0005386767,0.0006167336,0.00037409246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962364,0.001679808,0.00068722497,0.0006771011,0.0004018791,0.00031758964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004696174,0.00016922751,0.0006332929,0.002290501,0.003176348,0.004824332,0.0013734826,0.0021205381,0.0015971982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006486247,0.00023171825,0.0006272317,0.0028506767,0.029090324,0.006648903,0.0051697833,0.002710932,0.00014987013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005439782,0.000007784001,0.00060193695,0.000030429857,0.000003721891,0.000037643833,0.0020690577,0.00025160314,0.000045467877,0.99103516,0.00017295367,0.005738713],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000117967365,0.00003555674,0.0024934984,0.00016691233,0.000012917502,0.00022450316,0.0032049569,0.0009153926,0.00012306769,0.94619083,0.046601694,0.000018962364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049097063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038213967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057736593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057736593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004671313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04189104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109317889","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00125.x","title":"Qualitative Data Analysis Software: A Call for Understanding, Detail, Intentionality, and Thoughtfulness","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Intentionality; Qualitative research; Field (mathematics); Software; Qualitative property; Computer science; Data science; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Social science; Programming language","score_opus":0.6865553605851878,"score_gpt":0.6426512533990151,"score_spread":0.04390410718617277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109317889","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040404573,0.0012759803,0.93699205,0.029507717,0.0013827473,0.014376247,0.0013732618,0.0031976602,0.007853923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0097794775,0.0007772032,0.95447874,0.0020154004,0.00012260528,0.030139111,0.00030953903,0.000755373,0.001622588],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.60988784,0.337843,0.026873745,0.0042233546,0.01984701,0.0013250984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2453993,0.63362503,0.015849842,0.04811638,0.052227207,0.004782318],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.42425296,0.0016738344,0.0031237274,0.0104559595,0.005886357,0.010056588,0.0054959687,0.0027952099,0.013395824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45972613,0.0030757484,0.002577733,0.011692023,0.013659065,0.010445106,0.016590541,0.011841482,0.004378857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031070889,0.00024391421,0.0031739702,0.017313678,0.000272915,0.00057760073,0.25511658,0.0016657898,0.008846584,0.13733833,0.10781055,0.4673294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034048385,0.00037309647,0.0038076444,0.019441767,0.00015071392,0.0011279272,0.08450392,0.008052815,0.004776716,0.23241764,0.64435184,0.0006554885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033394168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067447885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.575747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074227885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027216945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7099986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141274297","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00108.x","title":"Ambivalence in Fictional Intergenerational Ties: The Portrayal of Family Life in Freedom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Citation; Sociology; Family ties; Gender studies; Media studies; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; History; Genealogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.053979664905403214,"score_gpt":0.31313611157724575,"score_spread":0.2591564466718425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141274297","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23987833,0.5927496,0.00544034,0.04779995,0.002074072,0.00003845873,0.00009696715,0.000033994456,0.111888304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9205803,0.074911244,0.00040465296,0.0017466261,0.0006092337,0.00002483068,0.000023694594,0.000011440706,0.0016879034],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972894,0.0020558708,0.0000596633,0.00010300206,0.00039616023,0.000095869866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99010897,0.008729367,0.0005503482,0.0002260648,0.00024838073,0.00013685369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003226558,0.00036048985,0.0005191077,0.0022133496,0.0018318153,0.0047709728,0.0008459997,0.0028606837,0.0018000588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009105812,0.00016269421,0.00025576,0.0021833333,0.01391003,0.004490136,0.0026786495,0.0022628985,0.00014205073],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014380708,0.00008221951,0.004710686,0.0035016546,0.00009420185,0.0027976446,0.42142463,0.0004163399,0.0013424346,0.34199113,0.011019286,0.21247599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038926333,0.00020358832,0.02531611,0.010253036,0.0001523875,0.015530678,0.27776983,0.0007194381,0.0013685373,0.13414022,0.5343768,0.00013054148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012344926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016077537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0047709728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001760055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007004434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017063916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274260131","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12120","title":"Advancing Dynamic Family Theories: Applying Optimal Matching Analysis to Family Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Optimal matching; Life course approach; Matching (statistics); Normative; Context (archaeology); Family life; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics","score_opus":0.09426502849351825,"score_gpt":0.43648910323161405,"score_spread":0.3422240747380958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274260131","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03606753,0.0116808275,0.9367822,0.003210217,0.00013823973,0.0001767884,0.00012975848,0.000051516992,0.011762992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6144538,0.020762362,0.3606679,0.0005860726,0.0003184254,0.0006966767,0.00020409469,0.000057959885,0.0022527315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99143946,0.006029888,0.00033953946,0.0007146281,0.0012520631,0.00022433895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811631,0.0148493,0.0012996778,0.0012648739,0.0011951382,0.00022783759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013237713,0.0006278744,0.0015190699,0.0051133432,0.0014398956,0.0025029988,0.0018989262,0.0012165844,0.003004637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039625537,0.00043501996,0.0013766629,0.006700413,0.004047645,0.00660906,0.0024187174,0.0020648509,0.00030310516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033630593,0.000101109414,0.0074766595,0.00030420473,0.00014934882,0.00008170649,0.0014497532,0.0124700805,0.00011779947,0.8167612,0.0010304878,0.16002409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011038484,0.000040295934,0.0030462646,0.0001720337,0.000032042088,0.000053134812,0.00067763135,0.0335074,0.00013687223,0.95692134,0.005385123,0.000016836464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054037087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035553782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013237713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034715105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039172657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070008576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291094006","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12127","title":"Queer Theory, Intersectionality, and <scp>LGBT</scp>‐Parent Families: Transformative Critical Pedagogy in Family Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Sociology; Queer theory; Transformative learning; Conversation; Scholarship; Gender studies; Queer; Disadvantaged; Reflexivity; Pedagogy; Transformational leadership; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.059958416950824746,"score_gpt":0.4385949237346852,"score_spread":0.37863650678386046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291094006","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061430432,0.3650201,0.060725503,0.2853845,0.0037240335,0.00030148638,0.00004620873,0.00013831488,0.22322936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.832596,0.12730083,0.016279927,0.0098093,0.0008410268,0.0005290563,0.000024540026,0.00006452992,0.012554719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937504,0.005234684,0.00012242702,0.00019433911,0.00048249855,0.00021565586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9844825,0.013471487,0.00064465887,0.00038447854,0.00057691726,0.00043990096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013721177,0.00040872907,0.00049866637,0.0023026185,0.003868582,0.0045953053,0.0016010641,0.0023256782,0.0031994404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0123280035,0.00021016384,0.00035623598,0.0014365374,0.024818158,0.0068626017,0.0034687847,0.0045447676,0.00026018173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015698966,0.00006357348,0.00092055567,0.0008738742,0.00001687279,0.00032982606,0.09766306,0.0002529069,0.00013763338,0.8242477,0.0073457975,0.06813246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002761161,0.00007553754,0.0023545565,0.005373638,0.000031779404,0.0008194875,0.14106785,0.0005535245,0.00076097035,0.5239624,0.32494694,0.000025826545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009094791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014706438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013721177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008134256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011388516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07256544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411742820","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12141","title":"A Historical and Empirical Review of Pornography and Romantic Relationships: Implications for Family Researchers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Romance; Psychology; Appeal; Social psychology; Aggression; Empirical research; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.2921752301649519,"score_gpt":0.471028398242292,"score_spread":0.17885316807734009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411742820","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016440076,0.9948625,0.00015077846,0.0012382377,0.00017291702,0.0000036759407,0.000011383847,0.0000016949164,0.001914822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0083934935,0.9906871,0.00013680437,0.00032076132,0.00022820124,0.000008484091,0.000010738201,0.0000021426893,0.00021234193],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990068,0.00053137407,0.00012426483,0.00012635662,0.00015203671,0.000059253904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931284,0.005457233,0.0004942307,0.00012254085,0.00059736316,0.00020010342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020578406,0.00049406465,0.0008931001,0.004573276,0.0014926937,0.0022062538,0.0006468805,0.0015051824,0.0036211312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006459556,0.00035711276,0.00041492915,0.008138019,0.0032355678,0.0034875518,0.0012476173,0.0016800377,0.0005243696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119495584,0.00014642147,0.010621389,0.020117033,0.000120446,0.0010251392,0.011736082,0.00031910266,0.00036206256,0.037358258,0.023029862,0.89504474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001141613,0.00019184547,0.04994165,0.04169202,0.00015932482,0.0060021738,0.02208166,0.00015124443,0.00032607384,0.0126463855,0.86673,0.000066350876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00552608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007867177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00552608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00202497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028511863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014692187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766233133","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12243","title":"Do Changes to Family Structure Affect Child and Family Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Instability Hypothesis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Mediation; Inclusion (mineral); Longitudinal data; Variety (cybernetics); Stress (linguistics); Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Demography","score_opus":0.06806773589689899,"score_gpt":0.35766486828194965,"score_spread":0.2895971323850507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766233133","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056276406,0.99897456,0.000045642177,0.0001381335,0.000037751644,0.000041794792,0.00009964082,0.0000014864727,0.000098269724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008869444,0.99043906,0.00021097506,0.00020860425,0.00003767267,0.00010977879,0.00008916963,0.0000014134455,0.00003378564],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99449676,0.002117968,0.0018233125,0.0005151514,0.00092107255,0.00012575643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689661,0.02473778,0.0040289443,0.0003581014,0.0016756215,0.0002334719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008189579,0.0010434297,0.0045697866,0.00738619,0.00048529988,0.0021857126,0.0013948109,0.0016585949,0.003712967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04401313,0.0008546836,0.0046749413,0.006960605,0.00090895675,0.0023652932,0.0014266159,0.0010526653,0.00023060915],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018172659,0.000032450516,0.0027641675,0.84764254,0.010641475,0.00011187791,0.0004896229,0.00013023295,0.00009097952,0.0006574812,0.0022138734,0.13504358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014715079,0.00025212287,0.013740889,0.8989694,0.051984854,0.0005117934,0.00080682663,0.000092023416,0.00013738214,0.00097405585,0.03233713,0.000046341123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010823206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022883624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010823206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025100172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008123137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04331112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772481629","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12220","title":"<i>Family Estrangement: A Matter of Perspective</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Citation; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.030581169014138983,"score_gpt":0.3551441103690143,"score_spread":0.3245629413548753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772481629","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020340372,0.9620473,0.000118057425,0.029408658,0.0071986043,0.0000029615305,0.000023820467,0.000002871186,0.0009943157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006975514,0.94003004,0.0002457469,0.029658176,0.02260159,0.000018843335,0.00005041882,0.0000057976745,0.00041396887],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981774,0.0007665164,0.00021723555,0.0002917453,0.00041116562,0.00013595847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900525,0.006851267,0.0011723941,0.00024379071,0.0013023472,0.00037757333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039475174,0.0007290075,0.0018510733,0.0033235871,0.0013130816,0.006515893,0.0018606172,0.0066128457,0.0048009525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010639618,0.0002773146,0.0008495374,0.006757031,0.005741219,0.0084776245,0.0032299396,0.00456929,0.00091287115],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016948735,0.000057216526,0.0033294712,0.026776848,0.00038358505,0.0008190275,0.0029774867,0.00023675096,0.00046248233,0.061703637,0.40385497,0.49922907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023637132,0.000106036976,0.0076874485,0.054886047,0.00029191736,0.0032707183,0.0070926487,0.00014477484,0.0001763632,0.03002611,0.89622265,0.000071687944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054664896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011978189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0066128457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002388234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050584096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020876706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789287698","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12238","title":"Strong Relationality and Ethical Responsiveness: A Framework and Conceptual Model for Family Science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Dialogical self; Epistemology; Thou; Psychology; Promotion (chess); Empirical research; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.108223194423127,"score_gpt":0.4821837737394564,"score_spread":0.3739605793163294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789287698","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10133641,0.016990392,0.45683822,0.103280276,0.0007134067,0.0008254511,0.00023648205,0.0001733442,0.31960607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94413817,0.003229637,0.047818523,0.0013336281,0.00015370436,0.00055778166,0.0000588619,0.000021218635,0.0026883243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923463,0.0059343064,0.0002008268,0.00050828373,0.000715235,0.00029506173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193984,0.004803988,0.0009930365,0.000567415,0.000767815,0.00092788914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010713445,0.0006384815,0.0005997793,0.004475791,0.00410541,0.00693993,0.0021962486,0.0034668404,0.004763514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009558984,0.00033046986,0.00080123835,0.0027975529,0.030678058,0.009716971,0.005384578,0.0034759804,0.00038454696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021416618,0.0000162787,0.00039827364,0.00003322787,0.0000033621393,0.00006569639,0.005814702,0.0002787261,0.000032746244,0.99020153,0.00030416748,0.0028491172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000963696,0.00002776767,0.0008977141,0.00025185803,0.000007850799,0.00026643556,0.0096090585,0.0026370217,0.00004273059,0.9686502,0.01758261,0.000017181066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048423368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030333372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010713445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008201905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005234991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059509337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790168176","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12237","title":"Family Development Theory 30 Years Later","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Development theory; Perspective (graphical); Relevance (law); Sociology; Foundation (evidence); State (computer science); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Economic growth; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04848585720679672,"score_gpt":0.3346350820272383,"score_spread":0.2861492248204416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790168176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02293568,0.3628978,0.030711284,0.10596956,0.005879075,0.0002243205,0.00048110881,0.000072707226,0.47082847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6718788,0.17622675,0.011603206,0.025573423,0.0021764718,0.00047514806,0.00029767744,0.00006729065,0.11170122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982218,0.0010483341,0.000058219917,0.0003390259,0.00022051885,0.00011211828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980806,0.0011710587,0.00010181522,0.000100976264,0.00042469235,0.000120921475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027651305,0.0006775296,0.0005824299,0.002352652,0.0017495571,0.0023897134,0.00068394706,0.00189347,0.0111091565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042894664,0.00022963017,0.00050973875,0.0021269803,0.006981757,0.0036507638,0.0020061887,0.0028681648,0.0015498314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022662312,0.000052271236,0.0011192412,0.0002786219,0.000015139045,0.00021814335,0.005653079,0.0005294154,0.00006460616,0.90285015,0.019330217,0.069866434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016336711,0.000046118566,0.00223078,0.0013306483,0.000010298326,0.00043594843,0.0031887093,0.00033289136,0.00012739963,0.20645563,0.7858085,0.000016721126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010553217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005702378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0111091565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089316005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005048788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06480366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801233653","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12257","title":"Parenting and Family Relationships in Chinese Families: A Critical Ecological Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"China; Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Chinese culture; Psychology; White (mutation); Developmental psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.17515328133079827,"score_gpt":0.42289954778731864,"score_spread":0.24774626645652037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801233653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7658244,0.17301811,0.011609463,0.018740496,0.0003655723,0.0007254943,0.00018721914,0.000021704021,0.029507704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970709,0.025058929,0.0030123626,0.00037345098,0.00007866814,0.00030069822,0.000026338868,0.0000027687354,0.00043779175],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99742836,0.0021422787,0.00006103008,0.00009453192,0.00016425436,0.00010967107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964413,0.0026995703,0.0003327634,0.00008580869,0.00032806615,0.00011250377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008911826,0.0005779177,0.00045514602,0.004525722,0.0034953824,0.002239116,0.0010749456,0.000561615,0.00085352536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005977335,0.00026810248,0.00031744494,0.0026658399,0.0054003675,0.0021956842,0.0018354503,0.0009629994,0.000030201205],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007288379,0.0003003071,0.17309806,0.003589013,0.00026023554,0.0029581853,0.38152,0.0020802906,0.00047006828,0.2825937,0.004602496,0.14845471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044151286,0.00024805852,0.42240536,0.0070768693,0.00045833673,0.0020389762,0.37307948,0.0076328646,0.00064298674,0.1111638,0.07512108,0.00008809981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046261966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059258837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046261966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008686996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065460126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091985404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802790248","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12261","title":"“I Didn't Get to Say Good‐Bye… Didn't Get to Pet My Dogs or Nothing”: Bioecological Theory and the Indian Residential School Experience in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Residential school; Sociology; Nothing; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.022148762696044724,"score_gpt":0.34316192685482955,"score_spread":0.32101316415878484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802790248","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044130936,0.86279684,0.00048870826,0.021764962,0.0006371727,0.00004453431,0.00009728737,0.000010925401,0.07002864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45375714,0.53793716,0.0003895445,0.0024346,0.00014850906,0.00004209683,0.000068463356,0.000008186294,0.005214382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985411,0.0005753055,0.000047407466,0.000119236014,0.0004207608,0.0002961738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982981,0.0005885567,0.00019461503,0.000048799622,0.0006568314,0.00021316305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002408473,0.0003035117,0.0006578963,0.0024466992,0.005704963,0.004405677,0.0017644556,0.0016341459,0.0024455285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00351173,0.00016311594,0.00028766363,0.0058080833,0.011706519,0.0023116935,0.001661548,0.0019340935,0.00016036835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009607995,0.00014282732,0.014399685,0.009733376,0.00014239049,0.0017839981,0.26231247,0.00084130216,0.00028066483,0.36359462,0.047773235,0.29889935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022905679,0.000045859764,0.045842763,0.0201481,0.00018420393,0.0010385438,0.30513063,0.00028087693,0.0002875432,0.01783133,0.60909754,0.00008985176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9168329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.938903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083167076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04059552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06882885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2945425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805009135","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12283","title":"Operational Stress Injuries and the Mental Health and Well‐Being of Veteran Spouses: A Scoping Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Spouse; Mental health; Psychology; Adaptation (eye); Marital relationship; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Sociology","score_opus":0.11966784648989537,"score_gpt":0.4869493173870207,"score_spread":0.3672814708971253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805009135","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002440954,0.99929154,0.000026563415,0.00013367113,0.000063859996,0.00001541492,0.000027100301,0.0000011154408,0.00019668162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017988393,0.99793684,0.000064526634,0.00007593617,0.000035165092,0.000023146065,0.000023322154,5.492215e-7,0.000041671698],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806076,0.0005745672,0.00060557644,0.00018663678,0.00048575088,0.000086609696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98650706,0.01052916,0.0013651883,0.00015466119,0.0013049995,0.00013885228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004113946,0.0009920227,0.0025898288,0.010243505,0.0006989347,0.0027969063,0.0012012486,0.0019166532,0.003228494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019077713,0.00063036836,0.0020544415,0.009604774,0.0007518166,0.0017482709,0.0013706256,0.0012379568,0.00036721514],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008585465,0.00006667468,0.0021382982,0.5361868,0.0018841896,0.00025300353,0.0010793174,0.00021902448,0.00022008784,0.001980122,0.009275707,0.44661084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019521282,0.00009875112,0.006829526,0.88390887,0.005054561,0.000789533,0.0015778919,0.00008217042,0.00014827169,0.0010127412,0.100443006,0.00003522235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007500057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013883592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010243505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016519238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007964681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021756887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806372304","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12284","title":"Toward a Model of Military Family Resiliency: A Narrative Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; Queen's University","funders":"Family Process Institute","keywords":"Narrative; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.1541007231089236,"score_gpt":0.47393235818887236,"score_spread":0.3198316350799488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806372304","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006850377,0.9913372,0.0009728254,0.0046483576,0.0004892798,0.00009123318,0.00010128463,0.0000067604046,0.0016680964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012587387,0.9834606,0.0015109496,0.00158159,0.00023907697,0.00022182625,0.0000764173,0.0000050585904,0.00031703012],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959787,0.0022488183,0.00072011654,0.00031686077,0.0006205673,0.0001149173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824796,0.013294049,0.0016618615,0.00028082987,0.0020777152,0.00020599985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008764059,0.00086369796,0.0014791841,0.008445871,0.0011467586,0.0033660142,0.0016585143,0.0018906279,0.0028745446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03118481,0.00048925023,0.001455079,0.006909176,0.0018252556,0.0050770445,0.0019988557,0.002445288,0.0004997691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015465435,0.000061455794,0.0019255702,0.33426243,0.0011547958,0.0013566224,0.013732087,0.0011118513,0.00057160645,0.084405124,0.059164967,0.50209886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023910334,0.00007289038,0.0017121469,0.513881,0.0014075256,0.00161713,0.007890272,0.00031741365,0.00026036368,0.013037052,0.45972604,0.000054246113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005638555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073088016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008764059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043293266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013850949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046349347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944796502","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12332","title":"A Collectivist Perspective for Addressing Family Violence in Minority Newcomer Communities in North America: Culturally Integrative Family Safety Responses","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Individualism; Intersectionality; Social psychology; Immigration; Refugee; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.06594820625890427,"score_gpt":0.3853419282721299,"score_spread":0.3193937220132256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944796502","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067672856,0.60864,0.015069717,0.21628195,0.002158636,0.00020740204,0.00004782065,0.000051296232,0.08987021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6588858,0.31008783,0.0084117465,0.016053954,0.0007289483,0.00044927362,0.00003491358,0.000039705188,0.0053077424],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937518,0.0046064625,0.00022195716,0.0002920191,0.0008303925,0.00029729714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937004,0.0039025727,0.0005315337,0.00030523032,0.0011187544,0.00044154996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011387935,0.0005672495,0.0008749653,0.0032940893,0.007435791,0.00642482,0.0019463078,0.0029461712,0.0010833343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006019529,0.00027936377,0.00047093348,0.0029316687,0.024318805,0.0049694097,0.008189576,0.004383254,0.00008893205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025240151,0.00012246947,0.0063599288,0.0066233817,0.00016212968,0.0010260857,0.5307506,0.00053641124,0.0008279862,0.2701867,0.011325019,0.17205407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014458853,0.0001031363,0.0102590425,0.012081703,0.00012341469,0.0012297793,0.5315782,0.0002584788,0.00042306978,0.0753374,0.36853793,0.000053470194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057260565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14186442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057260565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012360397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029583381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11385459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969171571","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12341","title":"Paternal Depressive Symptoms and Marital Quality: A Meta‐Analysis of Cross‐Sectional Studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Depression (economics); Meta-analysis; Depressive symptoms; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Marital relationship; Cross-sectional study; Quality (philosophy); Marital status; Association (psychology); Medicine; Psychiatry; Cognition; Population; Environmental health","score_opus":0.13493568600066114,"score_gpt":0.506083379924781,"score_spread":0.3711476939241199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969171571","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013830515,0.98473614,0.00060360745,0.00013552302,0.00011202663,0.000116376556,0.00025184584,0.000016171505,0.00019789205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27470556,0.72072214,0.0024758782,0.0005536639,0.00016126258,0.00038397106,0.00076007313,0.000028578559,0.00020897745],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481404,0.0024976663,0.0014575889,0.0006217092,0.00049811613,0.00011095473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814554,0.014048297,0.0025111777,0.00072926964,0.0010239294,0.00023198177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012916837,0.0017873266,0.008298541,0.0040973756,0.0006249639,0.002928395,0.0014883308,0.0012893928,0.0019062635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028748736,0.0013352602,0.019362634,0.0054304525,0.0005422599,0.0011580714,0.0013014891,0.0015264694,0.00017991973],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018023675,0.000046961395,0.013282882,0.12039824,0.84822613,0.00014133709,0.00013911427,0.0003791776,0.00029550397,0.00009866759,0.0003707148,0.0148189515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026887472,0.00019037529,0.011642059,0.009253568,0.97697747,0.00013486376,0.000059250226,0.00012717905,0.00013596844,0.00013252026,0.0010620644,0.000015767839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040073157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010846105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012916837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016212203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001963253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06831157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996392480","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12349","title":"<i>Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism</i>. Liat Ayalon &amp; Clemens Tesch‐Römer (Eds.). 2018. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. ISBN 978‐3‐319‐73819‐2. $59.99. Hardcover.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02729934662093766,"score_gpt":0.3061598714923334,"score_spread":0.2788605248713958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996392480","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006917189,0.99427396,0.00005172727,0.0023815464,0.0011710739,8.968305e-7,0.0000106990865,0.0000037293355,0.0020371787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026948864,0.99064916,0.000072875264,0.0008200837,0.0028740792,0.000005879297,0.000027175458,0.000005231998,0.0028505316],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997025,0.00012053963,0.000024684336,0.00004707017,0.000067290974,0.00003789697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992317,0.0005295203,0.00007106415,0.000021946602,0.00008733807,0.00005847473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008452144,0.0012349925,0.0011583489,0.0024148065,0.0006869651,0.0024594248,0.0009695589,0.0020287288,0.014656195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016696381,0.00043068454,0.00050567917,0.0034436597,0.001887041,0.0041556736,0.0015123147,0.0021303794,0.0041904277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010708752,0.000040994404,0.0005168998,0.0066381344,0.00005654941,0.00024001054,0.0022589683,0.00016179668,0.00026116232,0.027525153,0.57810676,0.38408652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008790401,0.00003651851,0.0019827262,0.0058167474,0.00003231827,0.0008723599,0.0014060283,0.000056344874,0.000119079225,0.021050021,0.96860147,0.000017663493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003745344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056924964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014656195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014678541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011578762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049029827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018573288","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12367","title":"Who Counts as Family Later in Life? Following Theoretical Leads","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Life course approach; Family life; Conceptual framework; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Strong ties; Interpersonal ties; Gender studies; Social science","score_opus":0.024073205454202433,"score_gpt":0.3236866086727614,"score_spread":0.29961340321855895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018573288","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.062315155,0.052888807,0.10154561,0.42596382,0.003533651,0.0006145532,0.0006329605,0.00009823113,0.35240728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87714815,0.029486597,0.023568831,0.032385733,0.0012784934,0.0016167714,0.00040117954,0.000077116834,0.034037165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855655,0.000902654,0.000051957304,0.00022194246,0.00012206237,0.00014493565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977944,0.0014660066,0.00020893481,0.00012420688,0.000253441,0.00015300304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003129848,0.00049035164,0.00042158272,0.0019610585,0.0037528544,0.00492369,0.0012388474,0.003008897,0.008004009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041460902,0.00023205936,0.0004852407,0.0021918663,0.01446948,0.010957164,0.0036489933,0.0034478372,0.0011038586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007236193,0.000016602462,0.00046651234,0.00006963411,0.0000025746187,0.00010104646,0.01201319,0.000051962845,0.000048237496,0.97776437,0.0030329858,0.0064257714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010914326,0.000039155617,0.0014901564,0.0007056075,0.00001016053,0.0004329024,0.04206941,0.00060618116,0.00019900648,0.8003257,0.15409508,0.000015815715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005458682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005489792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008004009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003918343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022324848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028429747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022564560","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12372","title":"A <scp>10‐Year</scp> Portrait of Theorizing in Family Gerontology: Making the Mosaic Visible","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Intersectionality; Sociology; Portrait; Family studies; Kinship; Gerontology; Gender studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Anthropology; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.052955210941387436,"score_gpt":0.340036931561349,"score_spread":0.28708172061996157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022564560","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006209266,0.42519224,0.014932046,0.28131753,0.030987253,0.00026879748,0.0011013793,0.00029759304,0.23969385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1399491,0.5867538,0.033541847,0.102282986,0.022196202,0.0014798124,0.002030251,0.0004932979,0.11127275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985598,0.000656423,0.00010408847,0.00008724988,0.0004858591,0.00010662201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993778,0.0039425786,0.000423104,0.00022629961,0.0011399006,0.00049022166],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004086439,0.00055665075,0.00043339143,0.007732863,0.0033579615,0.0060388893,0.0014512422,0.0027540957,0.01246706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00635657,0.00028483794,0.0007400397,0.011176175,0.0054087546,0.006649886,0.002741745,0.004416749,0.0029700198],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019962177,0.000050741863,0.001114846,0.0014500292,0.000017722605,0.0009943638,0.010161675,0.00023915229,0.00046366936,0.11678763,0.731953,0.1367471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003930475,0.000016079332,0.0031913186,0.0025499521,0.000008192072,0.00093305757,0.006245168,0.00016942936,0.000120892655,0.020457601,0.96629053,0.000013776552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014073442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024857275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99226713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005108737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006721032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041706443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119087335","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12403","title":"Beyond W.E.I.R.D. (Western, educated, industrial, rich, democratic)‐centric theories and perspectives: masculinity and fathering in Chinese societies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Masculinity; Sociology; Gender studies; Democracy; Hegemonic masculinity; Hegemony; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.029041738101894296,"score_gpt":0.31833142643006523,"score_spread":0.2892896883281709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119087335","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049190626,0.88893545,0.00245804,0.0110092545,0.0006028743,0.000033873268,0.00003522585,0.000011701533,0.047722977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46226698,0.5300175,0.0010035777,0.0016493257,0.00046351666,0.000043570897,0.000021529331,0.000003849923,0.0045301146],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994849,0.0002264737,0.000030370786,0.00007399429,0.00014522154,0.000038984963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992668,0.0004164675,0.00010632756,0.000031587224,0.00012443739,0.00005427584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019522811,0.0002526652,0.00044411488,0.0013149068,0.0010180766,0.0018795729,0.00046339975,0.0005719076,0.0015806012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011458544,0.00007851317,0.00024550123,0.0017485081,0.0035584879,0.00148917,0.0008217448,0.0007155072,0.00012912674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000685877,0.000080887155,0.017235216,0.011228603,0.0001576602,0.0012857848,0.04672463,0.0010210912,0.0011922872,0.47423226,0.008866858,0.4379062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049625167,0.00047734324,0.1126644,0.022381665,0.0004472015,0.0030648382,0.04884338,0.0019947027,0.0018145045,0.16682896,0.64134985,0.000083455576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010877032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0133378245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010877032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016889288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004888599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021627486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177695764","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12424","title":"Ethnic and diverse fathering: Moving research forward","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Diversity (politics); Immigration; Relevance (law); Sociology; Cultural diversity; Psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.2398542402406454,"score_gpt":0.46178559303681016,"score_spread":0.22193135279616477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177695764","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021857738,0.96899575,0.00040120987,0.024914367,0.001309105,0.000009979767,0.00000855947,0.000003652096,0.00217156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031704076,0.96173626,0.00080690143,0.0042381575,0.0011557944,0.00002557989,0.00001281184,0.000003517676,0.00031697832],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99486214,0.00332917,0.0003090717,0.00048430313,0.0007359613,0.0002793397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95652753,0.032291427,0.0024263973,0.0007436978,0.006270326,0.001740541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02182196,0.0004405874,0.0020336679,0.003207977,0.0017221187,0.0054818005,0.001323993,0.0037085263,0.0042479257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025179882,0.00035462802,0.00067454466,0.003929143,0.003620294,0.009537474,0.0028264124,0.0049373317,0.00064193225],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017610296,0.00023463012,0.005684443,0.031561602,0.00029663616,0.00050762726,0.017694212,0.00026819517,0.00040674055,0.13314265,0.019768886,0.7902582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007812686,0.00044327276,0.022275459,0.18475236,0.0005833644,0.0013165742,0.070251115,0.0004162661,0.0005122947,0.111339435,0.60792786,0.0001039602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068550687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009077656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02182196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00351901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009529814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11540693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179787123","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12427","title":"Age‐dissimilar couple relationships: 25 years in review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach; Scholarship; Gender studies; Sociology; Human sexuality; Race (biology); Nationality; Social class; Inequality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Marital status; Power (physics); Psychology; Social science; Social psychology; Geography; Political science; Demography; Population; Immigration","score_opus":0.05100488695787477,"score_gpt":0.3517740607807134,"score_spread":0.30076917382283863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179787123","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000088436864,0.9995546,0.00001237076,0.00017333469,0.000067808316,0.0000018059261,0.000007572984,6.8819014e-7,0.00009348316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012993102,0.9983382,0.00002510445,0.00018761892,0.000104591105,0.0000056575614,0.000011548988,8.4635775e-7,0.000026933732],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840957,0.0005262229,0.00042232338,0.00026889527,0.00028140636,0.00009171089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98308265,0.013621831,0.0018366652,0.00017681853,0.0009468608,0.0003350751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034002492,0.0007758045,0.002769854,0.005227163,0.0006475803,0.0031958488,0.0012954348,0.0021581817,0.004348315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0141728325,0.00068801275,0.0010690057,0.009133272,0.001578564,0.003954314,0.00169299,0.0017914668,0.00060533907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013957161,0.00006319585,0.0019461561,0.141201,0.00051335007,0.00044190386,0.001636559,0.0002479364,0.00011448562,0.0049112677,0.02177735,0.82700723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036299385,0.00016770793,0.010838716,0.26856467,0.001471151,0.004392421,0.0037743535,0.000110051216,0.00016901248,0.004022705,0.7063736,0.00007937169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003480221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049005803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005227163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001670251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005161006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017982483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280623190","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12456","title":"The procreative identities of men in same‐sex relationships choosing surrogacy: A new theoretical understanding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Social psychology; Consciousness; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1263579949449796,"score_gpt":0.3640384442898065,"score_spread":0.23768044934482688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280623190","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13744485,0.63637304,0.01691292,0.07543917,0.001421673,0.00009903192,0.00006512696,0.000017174638,0.13222705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.728436,0.25870645,0.0036289766,0.0045799348,0.0005289595,0.00015324491,0.00004136167,0.000008856663,0.003916339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980515,0.0014240838,0.000053006108,0.00013078388,0.00023187026,0.000108613036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747366,0.0018297604,0.00028688592,0.00008010568,0.00017462068,0.00015486965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035272762,0.00023096168,0.0004721358,0.0018396754,0.001910354,0.0045997174,0.00088190654,0.0021874136,0.001858318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030382655,0.0001751223,0.00032670354,0.0014125878,0.0138974525,0.0054853116,0.0027214745,0.0029901338,0.00016410516],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035943285,0.00012328004,0.0054970495,0.0011822773,0.000021783228,0.00056698034,0.12368274,0.00024643724,0.00028074963,0.7536779,0.0028006586,0.11188416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030304087,0.00018917365,0.014714679,0.012040927,0.00007633479,0.004794056,0.3119883,0.0012459763,0.000557382,0.32101533,0.33328497,0.00006258886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046516648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005541189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046516648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027514868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037225944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019963503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283712922","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12467","title":"Parental consideration of children's experiences: A critical review of parenting constructs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Empathy; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Developmental psychology; Autonomy; Perspective-taking; Social psychology; Parenting skills","score_opus":0.09256741346895579,"score_gpt":0.3933928075246969,"score_spread":0.3008253940557411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283712922","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000672128,0.9981541,0.00013022564,0.00053089234,0.00014036775,0.000009324989,0.000011089319,0.000001465091,0.00035048492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0058578644,0.99338466,0.00030482272,0.00023729884,0.00009592624,0.000029940466,0.000016519754,0.0000028160644,0.00007004774],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666744,0.0018121707,0.0005409407,0.0003085634,0.00056119636,0.00010968046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98247874,0.015110311,0.000664112,0.00018770926,0.0014162317,0.00014288408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078621395,0.0007497036,0.001928372,0.005901925,0.0010615805,0.0026972084,0.0010920069,0.0015122549,0.0012154515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014182603,0.0005953092,0.00092178705,0.0052462467,0.0026561336,0.0032091406,0.0016839443,0.0030363612,0.0002635618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000124958,0.00006832229,0.0036040558,0.07565065,0.00036844547,0.0011533445,0.025186844,0.00018773093,0.00047831,0.012716196,0.014779989,0.8656812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016774009,0.00019202952,0.022667743,0.31408474,0.0007267099,0.0060125887,0.02941326,0.00011743523,0.0006338918,0.005894999,0.6201353,0.00010454024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071998355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009697796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0078621395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028873081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005432299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041579425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306784161","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12479","title":"Parent‐adolescent conflict processes and their measurement: A systematic review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Duration (music); Quality (philosophy); Systematic review; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; MEDLINE; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16791806196355272,"score_gpt":0.3663081150849953,"score_spread":0.19839005312144256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306784161","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009970062,0.9977259,0.00018749759,0.00014365358,0.000073215066,0.000489192,0.0001986909,0.000005983289,0.0001788729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013357731,0.9845078,0.00074036425,0.00017025162,0.000050943847,0.00094796764,0.00014454374,0.0000032341989,0.00007727032],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.989739,0.003292992,0.0036909932,0.0007190155,0.0023026397,0.00025542537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95778185,0.02930823,0.007331678,0.0005778683,0.004542091,0.00045822092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013753822,0.001490588,0.006664163,0.015675755,0.0008687787,0.0031417964,0.0019896717,0.00186462,0.0035103993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057645682,0.0012822566,0.004990145,0.016153647,0.0010662545,0.0031634879,0.0018180029,0.0012236818,0.0003130438],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010825682,0.000023043494,0.0011116697,0.93704313,0.003795435,0.00009999028,0.00037399825,0.000081518294,0.00012849185,0.00024818265,0.0011611395,0.055825047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010700785,0.00016832081,0.0051710624,0.9479152,0.02979599,0.00037890067,0.0005334044,0.00008133922,0.00016071872,0.00023889264,0.015417827,0.000031326064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074718166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020980332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015675755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004342817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016436864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07273799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362722592","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12499","title":"Critically feminizing family science: Using femme theory to generate novel approaches for the study of families and relationships","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Femininity; Relational theory; Psychology; Human sexuality; Gender studies; Promotion (chess); Feminist theory; Friendship; Field (mathematics); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Feminism; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.4125728911512745,"score_gpt":0.4161081050780253,"score_spread":0.0035352139267508242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362722592","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031895302,0.64183503,0.106162295,0.11491949,0.004052997,0.00024711122,0.00011009971,0.00007378434,0.10070384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7358433,0.21341328,0.033741977,0.008902599,0.001334185,0.0006856654,0.00005923818,0.00005188355,0.00596781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908382,0.008200662,0.00011766067,0.00023853831,0.00046095107,0.00014405724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98913586,0.009403746,0.00040847284,0.00040899633,0.00045174127,0.00019121263],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013795158,0.00059241743,0.0008606435,0.0034308105,0.0022648317,0.003389131,0.001530133,0.001973979,0.002104325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009033221,0.00021850337,0.00048468966,0.0015110112,0.022890981,0.005847113,0.003701644,0.0034355167,0.00016860839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016909678,0.00003062636,0.00075988984,0.0015311277,0.000044591532,0.00027131863,0.04317196,0.00057014055,0.00021962605,0.8811016,0.004447973,0.06783424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015764746,0.000065291046,0.0018959491,0.006718961,0.00003462572,0.00061385037,0.057385746,0.00089348987,0.00040633883,0.6519487,0.2799913,0.000030029483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033505575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005852643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99773514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045548165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050000562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07295662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366773660","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12507","title":"The rise of the childless single in South Korea","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Psychology; Young adult; Institution; Gender studies; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Demography; Social science","score_opus":0.028562643859352272,"score_gpt":0.3089335774607699,"score_spread":0.2803709336014176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366773660","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08133761,0.910194,0.000089615,0.0053012944,0.00030274098,0.000013494212,0.0001039696,0.0000037179047,0.0026535103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31625882,0.68121874,0.00012875754,0.00174674,0.00013738021,0.000013610138,0.00008043284,0.0000025379395,0.0004129212],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996271,0.00011934657,0.000067536814,0.0000699049,0.00007417397,0.00004197149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987134,0.00026112227,0.00072597846,0.000017262495,0.00016136677,0.00012091566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009229471,0.00016812628,0.0003241434,0.0017569696,0.000568716,0.0013978892,0.00035579898,0.00059046136,0.0016432545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013439314,0.0001656392,0.0003203899,0.0025707958,0.00078118703,0.0012018792,0.0010905697,0.0007280698,0.00013660073],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002438056,0.000121611854,0.14577927,0.05702941,0.00065233593,0.017372485,0.027367434,0.00027448396,0.0025488753,0.012601499,0.017823562,0.7181852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042963005,0.0004262806,0.4533335,0.050926846,0.0012749298,0.036970686,0.11123378,0.00016188128,0.0010432447,0.0034113035,0.3410625,0.0001120935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060262745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014535122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060262745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009957696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020432286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011982381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391779307","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12555","title":"<scp>FD</scp>/<scp>FR</scp> family: Functional disconnection and reconnection in public safety personnel families","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mental Health Research Canada; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Disconnection; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.05614262604067391,"score_gpt":0.35091559834796027,"score_spread":0.2947729723072864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391779307","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08781855,0.8052672,0.0031283458,0.049796406,0.0025703823,0.0001569717,0.00020507241,0.000040131075,0.051016904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5436905,0.44380257,0.0016847539,0.0042707995,0.000880466,0.00016619623,0.00014323487,0.000013952449,0.0053475713],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993357,0.00042728722,0.000034001587,0.000032752374,0.00011254104,0.000057669993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998489,0.00077584275,0.00024249665,0.000044019755,0.0002589888,0.00018957946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016445912,0.0001580932,0.00031454468,0.0009556477,0.0009271623,0.0010556168,0.0003700056,0.0009353983,0.004412936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033825678,0.000068905836,0.00035536272,0.0008357315,0.0011305565,0.0009240439,0.0011577548,0.0010975093,0.00037472506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014658329,0.00021012571,0.019329133,0.007468134,0.0001370855,0.0020690402,0.014984542,0.00042370503,0.0005688298,0.032573972,0.048954897,0.87313384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086287386,0.00078773947,0.15733537,0.042457726,0.00029616928,0.016911952,0.06908043,0.0006958933,0.0015526273,0.034219842,0.67646104,0.00011495208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073678894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011868758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073678894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017116773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028028735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014762759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400218588","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12572","title":"The recognition and the initial reaction to children's signals after experiencing maltreatment during childhood","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Jeunesse de Quebec; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attribution; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Developmental psychology; Meaning (existential); Early childhood; History of childhood; Childhood abuse; Child abuse; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Psychiatry; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.030074889485235613,"score_gpt":0.3217128700407423,"score_spread":0.29163798055550666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400218588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93416435,0.049429454,0.0009930503,0.0014934465,0.00014362841,0.00006245991,0.00014408994,0.00002043472,0.013549127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9603738,0.036846817,0.00058184454,0.00021147885,0.000053293523,0.000059040758,0.00009161572,0.000009123135,0.0017729355],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895763,0.0005730813,0.000051731357,0.000087278815,0.00021701012,0.00011329088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948337,0.0025985304,0.0017121441,0.00012463724,0.00045868516,0.0002722865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016144033,0.00020439677,0.00041444725,0.0006462424,0.00040916432,0.0014306001,0.00039244152,0.0007956518,0.0024806077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009133829,0.00018569684,0.00035393948,0.00064632494,0.0010040422,0.0006142313,0.0007262871,0.0011127113,0.0002832626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013001182,0.00083707477,0.435421,0.004917001,0.00051126035,0.0039050127,0.090504244,0.0005445905,0.012653382,0.006976418,0.0037821801,0.43864775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017622895,0.00056747283,0.95730335,0.0015285542,0.00017718774,0.0033265143,0.022979263,0.00014273245,0.0028722982,0.0017594717,0.009278584,0.000046885474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039340337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003160835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039340337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000849516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007334712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0085378885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402660439","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12590","title":"Bringing birth fathers to the forefront: A two‐decade scoping review of birth father experiences in adoption","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology","score_opus":0.036995745221214696,"score_gpt":0.36739109579471185,"score_spread":0.33039535057349717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402660439","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033705658,0.99573576,0.000104156716,0.0002890366,0.000078325706,0.000050869614,0.00007020241,0.0000016805913,0.00029932964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024808913,0.9743267,0.00027075032,0.00025699678,0.000039161376,0.00014900522,0.000078719524,0.0000023359573,0.00006733886],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903008,0.0044119875,0.0028688342,0.00066988845,0.0014810581,0.00026748265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434221,0.045705356,0.0059954,0.00053482596,0.00393524,0.0004071771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01600799,0.00065093284,0.0025747311,0.009979028,0.00092965417,0.0034544675,0.0008650417,0.0015725753,0.0019578629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050697815,0.00088989816,0.0025322926,0.012526286,0.0012258814,0.003493219,0.0021033038,0.0014212149,0.00015305194],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029969827,0.00006812007,0.008894747,0.72105896,0.0041954652,0.00056922797,0.013958096,0.00015876061,0.0003403245,0.001812026,0.003194662,0.24544992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027296492,0.00012220847,0.01368063,0.93553525,0.006774451,0.000683069,0.008485704,0.000047124995,0.00016248086,0.00030986973,0.034141183,0.000030706375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008617992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020772668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01600799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029609473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010525426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08465934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411515504","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70000","title":"The gendered division of housework in <scp>North America</scp>: A systematic review from 2014 to 2024","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Université de Moncton","keywords":"Scopus; PsycINFO; Systematic review; Empirical research; Division of labour; Psychology; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.0418635212750561,"score_gpt":0.35968389639447645,"score_spread":0.31782037511942035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411515504","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013927746,0.9972498,0.00010922613,0.00023307042,0.00010430236,0.00027956904,0.00038536784,0.0000054781344,0.00024035513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023263015,0.97412443,0.00059660646,0.0005480455,0.00008286039,0.0009355316,0.00032119147,0.0000046357823,0.00012382727],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918406,0.0031234715,0.002403619,0.0006805978,0.0016031157,0.00034847317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98071045,0.012620148,0.0038891465,0.00033675865,0.002178497,0.0002650318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009222489,0.0013341391,0.0061772796,0.010268917,0.0008453489,0.0026061558,0.0013992691,0.0015130991,0.0034851113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038883887,0.0008629699,0.006265504,0.0113157015,0.0009846138,0.0020263002,0.0018792795,0.0011392013,0.0002112765],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018116679,0.000014085345,0.001473139,0.94143486,0.009248009,0.000097653705,0.00040093844,0.00006382075,0.000091114016,0.00023697792,0.0018451847,0.04491309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013000832,0.00014344283,0.0076448587,0.92681706,0.04778038,0.00031336024,0.0010276627,0.000050819963,0.00013007839,0.0002676833,0.015662583,0.000032192358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0207565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057820767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0207565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051555545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0184997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048773766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}