{"meta":{"query_hash":"bf5458bd50ef","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review"},"cohort_total":40,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":40,"exported":40,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/bf5458bd50ef","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Family+Theory+%26+Review"},"results":[{"id":"W1491113523","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12051","title":"Fathering, Feminism(s), Gender, and Sexualities: Connections, Tensions, and New Pathways","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Gender studies; Human sexuality; Sociology; Disadvantaged; Feminist theory; Feminist philosophy; Narrative; Variety (cybernetics); Diversity (politics); Race (biology); Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.11024366578309136,"score_gpt":0.3405313428726745,"score_spread":0.23028767708958314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491113523","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04748741,0.9152693,0.0011342835,0.0011568862,0.0006980862,0.00029799162,0.000003936713,0.00005283671,0.033899244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12756215,0.86588794,0.00136241,0.003365209,0.00077774894,0.0000041004596,5.1679683e-7,0.000024181778,0.0010157669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763757,0.0009977134,0.0005434184,0.00018691727,0.00036893718,0.0002654208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99784863,0.001002188,0.00047036627,0.00019802805,0.00016445977,0.00031634074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053761597,0.00017123064,0.00057068,0.0000797267,0.00030788308,0.00007122616,0.0002289544,0.0000982554,0.000086929474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013050777,0.00013357915,0.00010664927,0.00015919471,0.00028329552,0.00024103858,0.00005793951,0.00028437792,0.000009272391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050601593,0.0001188344,0.004741922,0.0017621742,0.0002230245,0.00002372339,0.031049736,0.000001623809,0.0005272778,0.53076345,0.047912054,0.38282558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005157895,0.00021108602,0.0077918223,0.0039860457,0.00018907335,0.00012243341,0.042740706,9.583698e-7,0.000004290317,0.09427026,0.84986293,0.00030461562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000371186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017977796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8019509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005125097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022231297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54471993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573911538","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12037","title":"Cultivating the Family Studies Terrain: A Synthesis of Qualitative Conceptual Articles","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative research; Scholarship; Contemplation; Sustainability; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Conceptual framework; Engineering ethics; Social science; Epistemology; Political science; Ecology; Engineering; Biology","score_opus":0.5350695537336045,"score_gpt":0.6038345834614222,"score_spread":0.06876502972781762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573911538","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1319116,0.7912302,0.015978845,0.03551378,0.0004935671,0.00091761566,0.000017353552,0.000026616357,0.023910427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60416454,0.37195343,0.01663545,0.006234605,0.0005824228,0.000037329715,2.2784572e-7,0.000028572715,0.00036344625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9561824,0.041162703,0.0010921848,0.00013437017,0.0011102001,0.00031811587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9416726,0.05472796,0.001395755,0.00023731058,0.0018166186,0.00014974465],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.11396531,0.00014467147,0.0008424604,0.00007189006,0.00044151564,0.000030615975,0.000558817,0.00005869712,0.000038934413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10375444,0.000078126126,0.00036146404,0.0004733486,0.003885494,0.00024440052,0.00007255041,0.00048009184,0.000008210051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041498264,0.00004756604,0.000020404817,0.00070743286,0.0002800377,0.000001963328,0.31650037,0.0000012014126,0.0015245588,0.50979763,0.0028524324,0.16822492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014682472,0.0001981584,0.00011673236,0.0069636684,0.00013431419,0.0000016313566,0.7310624,0.00000199471,0.00021462499,0.20554583,0.055499986,0.00011383164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007614122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012937777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4722529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075622236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003044925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1810419649","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12038","title":"Is Marriage Individualized? What Couples Actually Do","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Perspective (graphical); Focus (optics); Psychology; Key (lock); Empirical examination; Social psychology; Sociology; Positive economics; Computer science; Economics; Social science; Actuarial science; Computer security","score_opus":0.02663252746026722,"score_gpt":0.3354357102804068,"score_spread":0.3088031828201396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1810419649","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09279737,0.8065027,0.0063537043,0.007814864,0.005081816,0.0005916915,0.000020555455,0.000039973474,0.08079734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17991836,0.787585,0.0011326611,0.028530624,0.0012973342,0.0000063541747,0.0000039582687,0.000027778386,0.0014979151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970971,0.0010138844,0.0006743032,0.00014601207,0.00081685017,0.0002518708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798197,0.00051712885,0.0006368699,0.00019979972,0.00050222565,0.00016198539],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008541603,0.00015449338,0.00047470516,0.00009132946,0.0002961447,0.00033412158,0.00058731687,0.000085668005,0.0007607018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000875684,0.00011923438,0.00039228104,0.00021003689,0.00014323376,0.0006999381,0.00005137246,0.00024348573,0.000049703583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023924611,0.000058330756,0.00016280857,0.0003215576,0.00015301541,0.000011601291,0.0052692182,0.000008261878,0.00038107662,0.6994785,0.032707475,0.26142424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024834316,0.000106444204,0.00031779232,0.006328796,0.00016864264,0.000014465145,0.0050296807,0.000017858742,0.000011333135,0.05333307,0.93419987,0.00022373152],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010702573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017301361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90149236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009474996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026771438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8329151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1905461277","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12041","title":"Exploring Revenge as a Feature of Family Life","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Perspective (graphical); Argument (complex analysis); Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Feature (linguistics); Family life; Sociology; Computer science; Gender studies; Medicine","score_opus":0.1511271999377534,"score_gpt":0.3876464154251166,"score_spread":0.23651921548736318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1905461277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30510485,0.6183409,0.00039873415,0.0014970419,0.0032972593,0.000685592,0.000013107649,0.000025173998,0.07063731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43066072,0.53119415,0.001012739,0.032502867,0.0013311662,0.00005033287,0.000005556275,0.000085247644,0.0031571968],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967348,0.0011891305,0.0010920856,0.00021118327,0.00041622735,0.00035658048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997422,0.00032251704,0.0012205545,0.0004970513,0.00020009128,0.0003378188],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047158343,0.00023944596,0.0009897086,0.00013679128,0.00006748802,0.000009891417,0.00042428364,0.00008896929,0.00025860852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031009995,0.00017673508,0.00042755602,0.00025122243,0.00007265243,0.00020546926,0.00004926165,0.00055275793,0.00019669266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010151829,0.0011333007,0.0007931566,0.015491995,0.00081835454,0.00012567521,0.0034161275,0.0000011858417,0.004570896,0.24025838,0.1457749,0.58660084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025732755,0.0026515983,0.023343906,0.03137922,0.000715385,0.00033539056,0.0037506977,3.8561967e-7,0.00016010861,0.013743914,0.9208876,0.00045851918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022707492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000012039154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7751127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006486564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012810365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72070473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1927404402","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12084","title":"Theoretical Triangulation as an Extension of Feminist Intersectionality in Qualitative Family Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Triangulation; Oppression; Sociology; Agency (philosophy); Privilege (computing); Epistemology; Viewpoints; Qualitative research; Gender studies; Computer science; Social science; Politics; Political science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.6847794256008514,"score_gpt":0.6918430938881255,"score_spread":0.007063668287274116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1927404402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67109853,0.15081948,0.011894155,0.023758184,0.0012284535,0.0019457093,0.000030465122,0.000026323474,0.13919869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96859384,0.02408426,0.0057155774,0.0010815078,0.00029773513,0.000010208803,0.0000025655308,0.0000161632,0.00019817345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9227188,0.07324044,0.001190982,0.00020993761,0.00230014,0.0003396624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98498684,0.010247249,0.00054551294,0.00024142466,0.0035949824,0.0003839769],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.28127056,0.00011272506,0.00063481665,0.00030837266,0.00016753847,0.000041418647,0.00044017797,0.00014120464,0.00015631752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05989227,0.00008323113,0.00020571842,0.0010217315,0.002937521,0.00037188004,0.000064928565,0.0010079537,0.00001518863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005788792,0.00018470803,0.000026421838,0.00022243104,0.00002186478,0.000013380294,0.078423455,0.0000011280897,0.00034414,0.8929388,0.0007949256,0.026449857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037298806,0.0006712979,0.00047440303,0.0022807082,0.000016870048,0.000004581492,0.20560724,0.000004424733,0.000023718416,0.78067803,0.009792793,0.000072942785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040576042,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000049453585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29749528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032841825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016566348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1989919133","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00027.x","title":"Reconceptualizing Parent‐Adolescent Relationships: A Dialogic Model","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Dialectic; Meaning (existential); Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Set (abstract data type); Identity (music); Psychology; Social psychology; Meaning-making; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Epistemology; Psychotherapist; Pedagogy; Aesthetics; Computer science","score_opus":0.14432824080675954,"score_gpt":0.37730585244007975,"score_spread":0.2329776116333202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989919133","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0995434,0.81971204,0.06638504,0.0010112682,0.0017272705,0.00060605415,0.000012498755,0.0000692888,0.010933127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.606552,0.37087816,0.002671736,0.018626,0.0004773984,0.000007747593,0.0000055081628,0.000036102316,0.0007453276],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967035,0.0010972951,0.0012816029,0.00023997444,0.00033424702,0.00034339697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977447,0.00030679192,0.0010192961,0.00047037337,0.00028544938,0.00017342859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041799424,0.00026466395,0.00073655084,0.00015009023,0.00014146387,0.000031557644,0.0004656583,0.00014463629,0.00016770656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026527687,0.00020699234,0.00051211705,0.00028821593,0.00007562754,0.00017652764,0.000014048247,0.0008389178,0.00009757848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007696074,0.0015861044,0.0020958292,0.0006978291,0.00052698574,0.00020365497,0.027958548,0.0012113141,0.0005916116,0.22995786,0.091323644,0.643077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005730749,0.0020653768,0.043073557,0.03121259,0.0023516077,0.0011880273,0.026552645,0.0010217302,0.0000014259962,0.6560806,0.228461,0.0022606812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000011645868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.0223676e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64081633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011006505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001076031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8440902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2044039676","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00127.x","title":"Interview and Memoir: Complementary Narratives on the Family Ties of Gay Adults","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Memoir; Narrative; Psychology; Family ties; Qualitative research; Narrative inquiry; Strengths and weaknesses; Developmental psychology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Sociology; Genealogy; Art; History; Social science","score_opus":0.06340715989634746,"score_gpt":0.34791136437123793,"score_spread":0.28450420447489044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2044039676","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40850714,0.5625368,0.00032044813,0.005903844,0.0011212735,0.00043430008,0.000021161912,0.0000072659896,0.02114781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8005869,0.18992108,0.00024997204,0.00865083,0.00038414745,0.000006002311,0.0000019180115,0.00001059811,0.00018854199],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971133,0.0015327369,0.00061371014,0.00008111971,0.00046171283,0.00019741549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984249,0.00050029316,0.00055487314,0.00013259894,0.0002933635,0.00009399897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006528996,0.00013077323,0.00039366822,0.000057196237,0.00023984886,0.000026774827,0.00033034102,0.000033173095,0.00018126184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022799642,0.00007703362,0.0002265291,0.00013683012,0.00026281519,0.00025047726,0.000054959914,0.00019976025,0.0000055248897],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007127472,0.0001425942,0.0005484435,0.0008095957,0.00023393995,0.0000026667926,0.025844079,0.0000018959008,0.000759391,0.8957867,0.026224997,0.04957441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060535944,0.00073254923,0.009678146,0.03124465,0.00032384315,0.000027846561,0.19221447,0.000014073278,0.00007435298,0.03401472,0.73058844,0.0004815643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028220917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000027909351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.861772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005624343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008674307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.314134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047395470","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00117.x","title":"Qualitative Action‐Project Method in Family Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Action research; Data collection; Meaning (existential); Qualitative research; Protocol (science); Psychology; Social psychology; Qualitative property; Applied psychology; Computer science; Psychotherapist; Sociology; Social science; Medicine; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.42146857347999356,"score_gpt":0.6144062837526024,"score_spread":0.19293771027260886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047395470","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17179129,0.7860415,0.018731408,0.00057976396,0.0034440667,0.00090134685,0.00001736377,0.000028994113,0.018464278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1930661,0.7622128,0.022266416,0.012353163,0.002381056,0.00013487789,0.000009938494,0.00018134544,0.0073943],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843508,0.012396393,0.0014119926,0.00026653017,0.0007998395,0.00077446795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99417335,0.0036211342,0.0007416437,0.0005452117,0.0007293008,0.00018936886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052959315,0.0002780637,0.0009822588,0.0006936568,0.000118615055,0.00003085772,0.00060868653,0.00019007549,0.00028782364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080568367,0.00021411783,0.00043865747,0.0012321817,0.00016986717,0.00037663977,0.00004946512,0.0016022214,0.0002224374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017525281,0.0016989538,0.00060034957,0.0014623449,0.0008476136,0.00011866148,0.27430093,0.0000067980536,0.0031154526,0.13180523,0.1382672,0.44602394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017801404,0.00072935846,0.007689038,0.004359381,0.00024508114,0.00032951531,0.2911253,0.0000053245817,0.000002822301,0.0390519,0.6541607,0.00052144943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111260655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009199312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51589346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025953542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002454924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9751777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094245575","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2009.00031.x","title":"Religion and Family Links: Neofunctionalist Reflections ‐ by Donald Swenson","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03670875847588364,"score_gpt":0.383692325613082,"score_spread":0.34698356713719836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094245575","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011614438,0.75364697,0.0021051716,0.0894708,0.0018764404,0.0004592884,0.000012345672,0.000080602505,0.14073394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030789416,0.9051396,0.00042497748,0.059204813,0.00056011655,0.0000039847428,0.0000034937775,0.00001061329,0.00386293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788845,0.00061695155,0.00063778664,0.00015054148,0.00049556355,0.00021072403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983973,0.00032618188,0.0004957257,0.00014213318,0.00042131174,0.000217337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024133578,0.00014040429,0.00037817116,0.000076614655,0.00057415274,0.00009904924,0.00020443628,0.00016134839,0.00007573636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004884936,0.00011403881,0.00036639906,0.0004006103,0.00016157092,0.00036629775,0.000011355159,0.0006489538,0.00003530957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037116773,0.00010423972,0.000021887994,0.000051335064,0.000054815537,0.0000062219624,0.0009508693,0.0000013957596,0.0022961635,0.07001981,0.9023114,0.02414478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017303739,0.00019029976,0.00028764634,0.001240721,0.00012470169,0.00004704904,0.0012920505,7.246762e-7,0.0000075777384,0.03212386,0.9643909,0.000121478464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013713584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000018085035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15149269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015045414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017801601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46503678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2097123728","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2010.00039.x","title":"The Deinstitutionalization of Marriage Revisited: A New Institutional Approach to Marriage","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Operationalization; Conceptualization; Institution; Institutionalism; Sociology; Positive economics; Criminology; Political science; Social science; Law; Epistemology; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.029863716397236367,"score_gpt":0.3115397114504248,"score_spread":0.2816759950531884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2097123728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06208307,0.3188461,0.24952008,0.0051207477,0.0075956816,0.0032819118,0.00008877534,0.00007826231,0.35338536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47425118,0.46162024,0.040970776,0.013108829,0.0047433428,0.000037101316,0.000040682447,0.00006626278,0.0051615704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997219,0.0006110909,0.00089188997,0.00016239361,0.0008529781,0.00026259176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977414,0.00030859618,0.0006644498,0.00030933233,0.0006864341,0.00028980768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00710696,0.00016020928,0.00043346235,0.00011163487,0.0005861756,0.00007404176,0.0007855544,0.000113048794,0.00007595618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023915165,0.00010724719,0.00028817574,0.0007405403,0.00040973167,0.00030874714,0.000057954476,0.00039396406,0.000019492882],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003172802,0.00007286803,0.00059672375,0.0002091596,0.000048105543,0.0000033558683,0.0007670762,0.000057668913,0.0004778075,0.97440946,0.0070622247,0.016263831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004449196,0.000072442264,0.010647195,0.0015717631,0.00023349028,0.000049329374,0.0012113998,0.0000164298,0.000007659588,0.07563082,0.9098716,0.00024297062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004866904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004493436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9028094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009142673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015192274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4508448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109317889","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2012.00125.x","title":"Qualitative Data Analysis Software: A Call for Understanding, Detail, Intentionality, and Thoughtfulness","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Qualitative Research Methods and Applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Intentionality; Qualitative research; Field (mathematics); Software; Qualitative property; Computer science; Data science; Psychology; Epistemology; Sociology; Social psychology; Social science; Programming language","score_opus":0.6865553605851878,"score_gpt":0.6426512533990151,"score_spread":0.04390410718617277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109317889","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036724715,0.13881958,0.8562596,0.003306229,0.000066918954,0.0003709164,0.000107380874,0.0000067031337,0.0006954495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1356195,0.36882073,0.48643565,0.0046593593,0.0015032899,0.00019625227,0.00012214766,0.000060615243,0.0025824562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99270415,0.0057465546,0.0005880373,0.00015667983,0.00052196585,0.00028260236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913156,0.0070624626,0.0005815456,0.00027853303,0.00049480883,0.00026701912],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.05706243,0.00010019946,0.00051991496,0.00013401387,0.00038641767,0.00005895184,0.00051716634,0.00004350804,0.00007488779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009047463,0.00007270304,0.00026072218,0.0007761558,0.0005209134,0.0006169095,0.00010742821,0.00017807515,0.0000031601558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022852108,0.0000854489,0.00026125324,0.00038132173,0.0006202602,3.27749e-7,0.007272922,1.2218263e-7,0.000011707241,0.9651678,0.0050591575,0.021116793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021642055,0.00005124984,0.00054356095,0.0006925504,0.0014974541,0.0000025145794,0.04496382,0.0000042911106,0.0000017816462,0.76366746,0.1882121,0.0001467771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038030943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046314766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36982393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000133635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019936533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2141274297","doi":"10.1111/j.1756-2589.2011.00108.x","title":"Ambivalence in Fictional Intergenerational Ties: The Portrayal of Family Life in Freedom","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Citation; Sociology; Family ties; Gender studies; Media studies; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; History; Genealogy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.053979664905403214,"score_gpt":0.31313611157724575,"score_spread":0.2591564466718425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2141274297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8018182,0.14959683,0.0023587174,0.0018022001,0.00308737,0.00057729473,0.00003152738,0.000011159502,0.040716723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376932,0.05871831,0.0007589657,0.002134357,0.0003865836,0.000012066243,0.0000027407948,0.000011228409,0.00028258527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99698395,0.0008444306,0.0011645078,0.00013554386,0.0006630109,0.00020856746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984395,0.00028613614,0.00060782913,0.00014824464,0.0004334775,0.0000848124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058082417,0.00013338355,0.00040626788,0.00016986746,0.00011194326,0.000021473286,0.00055645686,0.00007509018,0.00032413093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007087764,0.00009573437,0.00026173788,0.0003967741,0.00027196016,0.00029198342,0.000044260487,0.00035310854,0.0000058040505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013535938,0.00030580923,0.01306117,0.00025932828,0.000094905605,0.000033638073,0.008536901,0.0005180496,0.0010008272,0.964628,0.0068128128,0.004613247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003128398,0.001201629,0.6031875,0.0324797,0.0004547706,0.00012057176,0.066404894,0.0016891742,0.00010089722,0.19515583,0.094295956,0.0017806592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039956914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006957893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7694721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013692456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000770538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39039344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2274260131","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12120","title":"Advancing Dynamic Family Theories: Applying Optimal Matching Analysis to Family Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Optimal matching; Life course approach; Matching (statistics); Normative; Context (archaeology); Family life; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Epistemology; Mathematics; Political science; Statistics","score_opus":0.09426502849351825,"score_gpt":0.43648910323161405,"score_spread":0.3422240747380958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2274260131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40277752,0.3835355,0.13596189,0.005978422,0.0025817656,0.0024404067,0.000034121287,0.00012738827,0.06656298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8343309,0.13210014,0.023714792,0.005775618,0.0007461044,0.00008673703,0.00001243868,0.000104285566,0.0031290094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907616,0.0040526083,0.0014778813,0.00041690018,0.002357191,0.0009338159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391705,0.0018709935,0.000731319,0.0005593877,0.0020322492,0.00088897365],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04693684,0.00031338417,0.0011603876,0.001135228,0.0010253926,0.00026780568,0.0012994197,0.00019434691,0.000032086155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034404155,0.00025072033,0.0007145623,0.0046492354,0.00039923223,0.00066116336,0.00022666961,0.0012996251,0.00011731448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056527706,0.0005526357,0.0016978364,0.0011156359,0.0033107512,0.0003671387,0.048114438,0.04314518,0.0030282447,0.7106818,0.018692166,0.1687289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012759054,0.00074780424,0.005519798,0.009787177,0.0033498104,0.000043327345,0.26342514,0.001518691,0.0000027659198,0.27897826,0.43387014,0.001481171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033553794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016726277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43170354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008502373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013389532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291094006","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12127","title":"Queer Theory, Intersectionality, and <scp>LGBT</scp>‐Parent Families: Transformative Critical Pedagogy in Family Theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":89,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Intersectionality; Sociology; Queer theory; Transformative learning; Conversation; Scholarship; Gender studies; Queer; Disadvantaged; Reflexivity; Pedagogy; Transformational leadership; Psychology; Social psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.059958416950824746,"score_gpt":0.4385949237346852,"score_spread":0.37863650678386046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291094006","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26305082,0.5978775,0.018694723,0.0056711547,0.0042415247,0.0011478349,0.00015638168,0.000067884655,0.10909217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4972821,0.48139742,0.0001455865,0.016127381,0.0011023746,0.00007374696,0.0000037027232,0.000094564166,0.0037731458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907711,0.0055901734,0.0019468331,0.00041226955,0.00053709286,0.000742514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918235,0.0062578563,0.00060463,0.00047958852,0.00042066228,0.00041375664],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010617244,0.00045747194,0.0012248527,0.0005131271,0.00016711412,0.000055788314,0.00060603686,0.0002621406,0.0005908135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002133453,0.00029364953,0.0005136115,0.00034900472,0.0008032628,0.0006018324,0.00009123732,0.00087772135,0.0002885536],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036380615,0.000486126,0.0034766293,0.0045012147,0.0003425747,0.00013733054,0.0073115686,2.776297e-7,0.00024615656,0.80531764,0.017830433,0.15998627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029144804,0.0010588246,0.07825556,0.0071838396,0.0007653044,0.0011247189,0.012202234,4.5033158e-7,0.000010903739,0.7881721,0.107950136,0.00036140697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012725043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004856125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23423126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023341492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036071305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411742820","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12141","title":"A Historical and Empirical Review of Pornography and Romantic Relationships: Implications for Family Researchers","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pornography; Romance; Psychology; Appeal; Social psychology; Aggression; Empirical research; Political science; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.2921752301649519,"score_gpt":0.471028398242292,"score_spread":0.17885316807734009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411742820","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03194149,0.9513002,0.00132117,0.013540541,0.0001790896,0.00065900193,0.00001489876,0.000017755026,0.0010258425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025261192,0.96919596,0.0016578034,0.002853476,0.000091766364,0.00010387451,0.0000018428963,0.00003264892,0.0008014634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973298,0.00087097246,0.0011448078,0.00024235879,0.00017774107,0.00023437534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669373,0.0015611611,0.0007156576,0.0004676602,0.00040114718,0.00016062417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054940237,0.0001543396,0.0008151301,0.00027022447,0.000086681066,0.0000058099713,0.00028489748,0.0001515034,0.000037615453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016237556,0.000097335804,0.00026425722,0.0004179296,0.0003222343,0.00009858416,0.00004993352,0.00033238193,0.000003950558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018882686,0.00051131024,0.10527254,0.009389223,0.00033663673,0.0000136145645,0.00025410537,2.4677076e-9,0.001806501,0.24617055,0.11216932,0.5238874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010106061,0.00081486406,0.30307576,0.019256093,0.00085901027,0.0003616327,0.00019138321,3.241979e-8,0.0000034839004,0.05429228,0.61993057,0.00020425075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000050500307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.845151e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52368313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008048737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008415166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3969239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766233133","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12243","title":"Do Changes to Family Structure Affect Child and Family Outcomes? A Systematic Review of the Instability Hypothesis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Affect (linguistics); Developmental psychology; Mediation; Inclusion (mineral); Longitudinal data; Variety (cybernetics); Stress (linguistics); Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Demography","score_opus":0.06806773589689899,"score_gpt":0.35766486828194965,"score_spread":0.2895971323850507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766233133","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000057931935,0.9882379,0.000015702928,0.0010349182,0.0011951271,0.0067150374,0.00017297607,0.000017348446,0.0025530553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006395574,0.9918457,0.00024714082,0.007227788,0.00026624574,0.00008503938,0.0000031695474,0.000073207586,0.00018772372],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842117,0.009830835,0.0033058224,0.00053946144,0.0015950247,0.0005171624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888019,0.0030945647,0.00539631,0.001419647,0.00091802067,0.00036953302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018818624,0.0008296211,0.0075339195,0.00033738097,0.00058413396,0.00011365337,0.0021508199,0.0005025303,0.000038019512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01206548,0.00041672832,0.0024047447,0.0017581861,0.0006759552,0.00018029659,0.00032136063,0.0012297962,0.000020784453],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003994291,0.00004610364,0.00000993806,0.9310225,0.000523792,0.000003121797,0.0003090926,6.7004024e-8,3.9168302e-7,0.004004981,0.0016537332,0.062422276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000746898,0.00007695072,0.00014738708,0.6715172,0.0057794056,0.00003687381,0.00024193939,5.385772e-8,1.9131926e-8,0.0010659564,0.3207573,0.00030223286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022149026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000053213687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31910357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037959687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093924964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2772481629","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12220","title":"<i>Family Estrangement: A Matter of Perspective</i>","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Citation; Sociology; Library science; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.030581169014138983,"score_gpt":0.3551441103690143,"score_spread":0.3245629413548753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2772481629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123378284,0.33542842,0.0018980929,0.008337422,0.0025090966,0.0005460278,0.000026265201,0.000012099103,0.5278643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81709987,0.17342235,0.00077018637,0.00577417,0.00068545004,0.000005189057,7.7994946e-7,0.000021040147,0.0022209533],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823433,0.00036936355,0.0005535407,0.00011521942,0.00054165814,0.00018589593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976601,0.00010660922,0.0010307769,0.0003020836,0.00081058004,0.000089873705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034166286,0.00011617478,0.00042074858,0.000061837774,0.00041474425,0.00009232622,0.00076588086,0.000049219743,0.00024351182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004027812,0.00009274763,0.00038844798,0.00006858885,0.00028278452,0.00035797487,0.00005391735,0.00017987122,0.000031177246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050345912,0.0001305414,0.0019365296,0.000514819,0.00022588127,0.000041456544,0.0021348477,0.0000064956002,0.0032165556,0.9513439,0.026194273,0.014204333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016106871,0.00055155926,0.063805565,0.026287664,0.0011844648,0.00007571272,0.021309689,0.000020360565,0.000120856006,0.23636048,0.6476672,0.0010057741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018116593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000366902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71498346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011596978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025723534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37821385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789287698","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12238","title":"Strong Relationality and Ethical Responsiveness: A Framework and Conceptual Model for Family Science","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Flourishing; Dialogical self; Epistemology; Thou; Psychology; Promotion (chess); Empirical research; Social psychology; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.108223194423127,"score_gpt":0.4821837737394564,"score_spread":0.3739605793163294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789287698","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24431485,0.19379663,0.55509603,0.0027252731,0.0007088173,0.0006186439,0.000022131235,0.000014883107,0.0027027323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96339536,0.010734341,0.018421357,0.0067661377,0.00026940875,0.000012232726,0.0000016200123,0.000016618867,0.0003829008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982426,0.0004760909,0.00057491986,0.00021312888,0.0002939409,0.00019931821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707395,0.0016170421,0.00043495867,0.00019561035,0.0005451864,0.00013326928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006651985,0.00012712472,0.0003573325,0.00009800774,0.00029672642,0.000029689314,0.00020229178,0.00019674285,0.000030305075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013274465,0.00009405302,0.000096778465,0.00021627189,0.0019290433,0.00015380903,0.000055253913,0.0006784279,0.00000575523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030883707,0.00002420927,0.0019446905,0.000104781626,0.000049691866,0.0000021501385,0.0012703416,0.0000133056465,0.00010534479,0.98993164,0.0005123891,0.005732587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014900592,0.0009001417,0.084213324,0.0052359947,0.0006175676,0.00015998473,0.0024219656,0.005660299,0.0000025148574,0.89029735,0.008596465,0.00040433044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":5.2613683e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.5126928e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71908057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042913387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024983706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71076405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790168176","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12237","title":"Family Development Theory 30 Years Later","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Development theory; Perspective (graphical); Relevance (law); Sociology; Foundation (evidence); State (computer science); Epistemology; Political science; Law; Computer science; Economic growth; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04848585720679672,"score_gpt":0.3346350820272383,"score_spread":0.2861492248204416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790168176","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38893014,0.4018729,0.0050743064,0.0014230455,0.0044212807,0.000889483,0.000006762509,0.000081021535,0.19730106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66860443,0.2928454,0.008783412,0.017784517,0.0022392683,0.000014818197,0.0000042077063,0.0000832846,0.009640648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969105,0.0012465704,0.00077963946,0.00015089162,0.00059288356,0.00031951905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982599,0.00038778593,0.00051827484,0.00021027896,0.0004341258,0.00018962237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010242488,0.00015302392,0.00041566446,0.00012778801,0.00040999116,0.00006189927,0.00052977,0.000119795026,0.00046205803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004917668,0.00011335506,0.00023396278,0.000341522,0.0004489819,0.00021825891,0.000057271023,0.00034970068,0.00056216354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008122493,0.00019012782,0.0012691045,0.0003391287,0.0003605275,0.000076699536,0.010494547,0.0000035308324,0.00043169042,0.5909913,0.025043461,0.37071866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026374645,0.000094333336,0.021937199,0.0027962928,0.00014074799,0.000012574074,0.001749669,0.0000018468444,0.0000065789673,0.065633565,0.90712184,0.00024163732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007149512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009332244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88207835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014160297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059688644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72256625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801233653","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12257","title":"Parenting and Family Relationships in Chinese Families: A Critical Ecological Approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"China; Action (physics); Context (archaeology); Chinese culture; Psychology; White (mutation); Developmental psychology; Sociology; Gender studies; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.17515328133079827,"score_gpt":0.42289954778731864,"score_spread":0.24774626645652037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801233653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8314432,0.15050909,0.00033060703,0.0002993157,0.0004243783,0.00019147633,0.0000030475755,0.000011899167,0.016786974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722634,0.024588373,0.0010668156,0.0015587304,0.00034352756,0.000012014671,0.0000017356151,0.000010900992,0.0001545239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99712443,0.0013252831,0.0008641462,0.00022270116,0.00019561895,0.0002678127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982863,0.0009451324,0.00027765112,0.00017995543,0.0001854556,0.00012551558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003089428,0.00018937152,0.0006361564,0.000105972846,0.00012539372,0.000038748694,0.00024007037,0.00012268074,0.00025036873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016883506,0.00010958306,0.00017775942,0.00031758845,0.0003092792,0.0001694048,0.00006172306,0.0005912996,0.00005045687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007015532,0.002840467,0.38778389,0.003604827,0.0004301048,0.0002597936,0.012123875,0.0000019684142,0.0008946234,0.41447774,0.016857026,0.16002414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046962436,0.00038618292,0.9612421,0.0017243713,0.00011267015,0.0002293781,0.0038120488,0.000020847263,2.553866e-7,0.027775018,0.0040517566,0.00017575323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008017051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003435001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5734582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002689971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028014152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44686672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802790248","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12261","title":"“I Didn't Get to Say Good‐Bye… Didn't Get to Pet My Dogs or Nothing”: Bioecological Theory and the Indian Residential School Experience in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Residential school; Sociology; Nothing; Psychology; Socioeconomics; Geography; Ecology","score_opus":0.022148762696044724,"score_gpt":0.34316192685482955,"score_spread":0.32101316415878484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802790248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95372474,0.022588868,0.00007843152,0.008472401,0.0020994493,0.0017768336,0.000011494464,0.000012790279,0.011234992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77010036,0.184793,0.0006562081,0.037320383,0.0024641694,0.00003339683,0.0000014676924,0.000031497417,0.004599498],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99341315,0.00390103,0.0010036146,0.0002959196,0.0007365244,0.0006497356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660915,0.0014942222,0.00052644475,0.00032451272,0.0003531821,0.00069249445],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014126033,0.00021970144,0.00066769525,0.00015775877,0.0022615127,0.00013462795,0.00094746833,0.000085690765,0.00084910454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010889089,0.00011348762,0.00011544281,0.00061322795,0.0006135082,0.00030493626,0.000022153617,0.00047016304,0.000058680464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015176021,0.00017651093,0.0022783296,0.0004428141,0.0000764299,0.00027226,0.6819632,0.0000017608656,0.000019778276,0.29485273,0.008899624,0.009498983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058256974,0.00036459384,0.010445679,0.0020482491,0.000068336456,0.00010700162,0.03634587,1.8842128e-7,0.000013737428,0.01198142,0.937728,0.00031435522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5094593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97087204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92882836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007944506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021186814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805009135","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12283","title":"Operational Stress Injuries and the Mental Health and Well‐Being of Veteran Spouses: A Scoping Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Spouse; Mental health; Psychology; Adaptation (eye); Marital relationship; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Psychiatry; Sociology","score_opus":0.11966784648989537,"score_gpt":0.4869493173870207,"score_spread":0.3672814708971253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805009135","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002004014,0.9938763,0.00002061977,0.0007940062,0.00031439637,0.00363882,0.000046746027,0.0000058645,0.0012832263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000035554808,0.99630594,0.00016323962,0.0031079503,0.00017115573,0.00010119261,0.000020729802,0.000052917254,0.000073292584],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895143,0.0060163876,0.0030828137,0.00035093765,0.0006648942,0.0003706547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99429494,0.001778999,0.0028672908,0.00058646634,0.0002536584,0.00021866299],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009858103,0.00047590473,0.0045482554,0.00021013067,0.00020878416,0.000072310744,0.00073858316,0.000116703464,0.00046438642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076912896,0.0002645517,0.0006499476,0.00032715168,0.00090059853,0.00016423033,0.00022322002,0.000724353,0.000023472554],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005768947,0.000057558183,0.0000050176413,0.43472877,0.0004945809,0.0000055442383,0.00079411385,2.9404161e-9,2.0275047e-8,0.0060889586,0.0032134836,0.5545543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005575731,0.0002636026,0.0000038789894,0.7331203,0.00068781467,0.00046333356,0.00019196664,7.598621e-8,4.3940872e-8,0.0004555396,0.26410037,0.00015548272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016501748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000033729996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5543988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000639661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082865753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806372304","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12284","title":"Toward a Model of Military Family Resiliency: A Narrative Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University; Queen's University","funders":"Family Process Institute","keywords":"Narrative; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.1541007231089236,"score_gpt":0.47393235818887236,"score_spread":0.3198316350799488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806372304","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011479995,0.9829719,0.000172632,0.00014977036,0.0012445798,0.0030063777,0.00010885948,0.00001763458,0.012316744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000020079924,0.9899967,0.00078237243,0.006949076,0.00039667508,0.00014423915,0.000020776182,0.00010098393,0.0016071878],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98706615,0.004496277,0.00586746,0.0007548432,0.0010562827,0.000759007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914029,0.000679406,0.005129549,0.0015266499,0.00078798033,0.0004734822],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009919737,0.0009936135,0.008440859,0.0004339205,0.00011616955,0.000006489813,0.0020019186,0.0004527339,0.00048443812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057528727,0.00064559875,0.0034242042,0.0010765763,0.0005508125,0.00029236442,0.0001794704,0.0014693927,0.00038288845],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006104683,0.00021491063,1.6134669e-7,0.28984797,0.00036271266,0.000059357153,0.0006337593,1.6753742e-7,9.679756e-7,0.0010542196,0.13048899,0.5772757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001838764,0.0006842801,0.0000011103509,0.4503655,0.0025100347,0.0004846029,0.0003417452,4.1243803e-7,1.1119468e-7,0.0013744365,0.54374707,0.0003068164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017847506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000013182671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5769689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033318147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023924818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944796502","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12332","title":"A Collectivist Perspective for Addressing Family Violence in Minority Newcomer Communities in North America: Culturally Integrative Family Safety Responses","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intimate Partner and Family Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Collectivism; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Individualism; Intersectionality; Social psychology; Immigration; Refugee; Gender studies; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.06594820625890427,"score_gpt":0.3853419282721299,"score_spread":0.3193937220132256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944796502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7095702,0.20061578,0.00082465156,0.00033537595,0.0007455298,0.0026269217,0.0001095097,0.00003532393,0.08513665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73638904,0.25823286,0.0012626918,0.0033884002,0.00013124607,0.0000637959,0.000006913533,0.000024537887,0.00050053804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934929,0.0037490414,0.001248325,0.00029889532,0.00060719333,0.0006036551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99484605,0.0025414787,0.00090808177,0.0003320374,0.0012276255,0.00014475279],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054902467,0.00036871733,0.0013323929,0.00037427523,0.000402362,0.00011341635,0.0009524611,0.00011766077,0.00004191425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013704558,0.00027807502,0.00041874012,0.0014483412,0.00074567966,0.0007663606,0.00009732401,0.0009166224,0.000023956023],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017043894,0.00258062,0.12669323,0.005133006,0.0007912063,0.00023930623,0.3470082,0.00042369225,0.003887078,0.23945631,0.009361549,0.24738191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002280441,0.0009392766,0.38251403,0.034242388,0.00019459253,0.000017492597,0.5347901,0.00007049717,0.000011170043,0.012059658,0.031954106,0.0009262641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004770364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017730162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25582078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010334934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010518094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969171571","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12341","title":"Paternal Depressive Symptoms and Marital Quality: A Meta‐Analysis of Cross‐Sectional Studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Attachment and Relationship Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Depression (economics); Meta-analysis; Depressive symptoms; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Marital relationship; Cross-sectional study; Quality (philosophy); Marital status; Association (psychology); Medicine; Psychiatry; Cognition; Population; Environmental health","score_opus":0.13493568600066114,"score_gpt":0.506083379924781,"score_spread":0.3711476939241199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969171571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50292164,0.49487966,0.00040193854,0.000064917236,0.00036321065,0.00014629784,0.000019586245,0.000003804961,0.0011989571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94753695,0.04935865,0.00016325807,0.0005678105,0.00007756798,0.000008904176,0.000005717038,0.000013855747,0.0022672666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741054,0.00084042485,0.0011024864,0.00017182219,0.00033609747,0.0001386305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703753,0.0009238086,0.0013307938,0.00022949812,0.0004163625,0.000062006315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002888227,0.00016110751,0.0013189239,0.00023273828,0.000054170854,0.000020560958,0.00018563606,0.00008608176,0.000656583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010739238,0.00010239203,0.0011202442,0.00030696826,0.00017364683,0.00017081956,0.000060104707,0.00028751095,0.000017664875],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001313129,0.00010198038,0.76839316,0.00057237083,0.18906502,0.000011241877,0.00037504884,0.000068561676,0.000035057292,0.03968856,0.00006622174,0.0014914497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061639404,0.00021073158,0.8882148,0.00034118188,0.10128582,0.00007176993,0.00031449785,0.000012699098,0.0000011427943,0.008279908,0.0004890826,0.00016195899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006284228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000015392342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.445521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002804505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002943082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7189123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996392480","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12349","title":"<i>Contemporary Perspectives on Ageism</i>. Liat Ayalon &amp; Clemens Tesch‐Römer (Eds.). 2018. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. ISBN 978‐3‐319‐73819‐2. $59.99. Hardcover.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.02729934662093766,"score_gpt":0.3061598714923334,"score_spread":0.2788605248713958,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996392480","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16707052,0.64369404,0.0005806364,0.0038568599,0.0046867714,0.0012327819,0.000062730665,0.0000717645,0.17874391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4726024,0.5011392,0.00055747264,0.009584295,0.0019948767,0.000018386874,0.000014857558,0.00008481979,0.014003672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99548733,0.001135933,0.0011322745,0.0004571001,0.0012566869,0.00053067296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969313,0.00049010094,0.0011130603,0.0005212706,0.00065792503,0.00028634537],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059142136,0.00040629492,0.00095920794,0.00022452623,0.0004184682,0.00019118257,0.0008023162,0.00017551694,0.00080133264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005844128,0.00032426344,0.00086717797,0.00038396797,0.00017856578,0.00079036574,0.000107996624,0.0007435633,0.0005301167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007444699,0.001099433,0.0050157756,0.0019345884,0.0012825814,0.0002027345,0.016646642,0.00017904268,0.010095295,0.470872,0.46011367,0.03181375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064620783,0.00041698106,0.0012502599,0.005883931,0.00014231203,0.000019862568,0.005346019,0.000011650098,0.000024696588,0.0031001954,0.98260915,0.0005487467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017497496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005615136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52249545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035491402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006880931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3018573288","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12367","title":"Who Counts as Family Later in Life? Following Theoretical Leads","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Life course approach; Family life; Conceptual framework; Psychology; Social psychology; Sociology; Strong ties; Interpersonal ties; Gender studies; Social science","score_opus":0.024073205454202433,"score_gpt":0.3236866086727614,"score_spread":0.29961340321855895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3018573288","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31470925,0.25378907,0.0012638608,0.014573736,0.002381608,0.0004538771,0.0000075033518,0.00003182473,0.4127893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91431653,0.051431485,0.0001334557,0.033071168,0.0005630493,0.000002456789,0.0000010946575,0.000016366226,0.00046438773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820197,0.0005230512,0.00048611904,0.00011259835,0.00048502893,0.00019123254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992825,0.00017686834,0.0001665023,0.00007698016,0.00013337642,0.0001638019],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002501489,0.00010452472,0.00036927772,0.000046150984,0.00008958473,0.00005348303,0.0003128928,0.000067023386,0.0004120091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009031861,0.00008228836,0.0002927388,0.0002238609,0.000109136396,0.00016040042,0.000031848223,0.00027711995,0.00014818569],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023954404,0.00002014829,0.00042199923,0.00010490585,0.000043853477,0.00007548142,0.0012476095,0.000010126399,0.00031557513,0.98036796,0.011720151,0.0056482656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084415154,0.00035423329,0.002178536,0.00946808,0.00031663332,0.00001772934,0.004868354,0.00029418807,0.000015625668,0.14054398,0.8404078,0.00069071125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000062709455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000032513883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83982396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074985954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034738978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45112106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022564560","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12372","title":"A <scp>10‐Year</scp> Portrait of Theorizing in Family Gerontology: Making the Mosaic Visible","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Intersectionality; Sociology; Portrait; Family studies; Kinship; Gerontology; Gender studies; Psychology; Social psychology; Anthropology; Medicine; History","score_opus":0.052955210941387436,"score_gpt":0.340036931561349,"score_spread":0.28708172061996157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022564560","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2561708,0.5736518,0.0053483252,0.006416098,0.0014380793,0.0010377844,0.00003310462,0.00003954328,0.15586449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91656375,0.06952523,0.0008837754,0.011791082,0.00062856637,0.000010269994,0.000002813144,0.00003152206,0.000563018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965713,0.0012434445,0.0010365903,0.00018179616,0.0006344506,0.0003323934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755156,0.00086715457,0.0009180469,0.00017611639,0.00038104027,0.000106105894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006405092,0.00017397369,0.00063876074,0.00009329358,0.00019609826,0.00005734645,0.0007602224,0.000095288975,0.000089696536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019993521,0.000121604135,0.0003942651,0.00057554716,0.0002224252,0.00026144387,0.00007846518,0.00043494283,0.00001463215],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004433554,0.000083074156,0.0012639973,0.00065306335,0.00016857458,0.00007138373,0.009973928,0.000204228,0.002568818,0.94402725,0.02579203,0.015149333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012598847,0.00074166065,0.008817425,0.014878665,0.00057172135,0.00005880512,0.07271524,0.000502501,0.000053736298,0.10160698,0.798352,0.00044139547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038011363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004618971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8424203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010450598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005001605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49588725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119087335","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12403","title":"Beyond W.E.I.R.D. (Western, educated, industrial, rich, democratic)‐centric theories and perspectives: masculinity and fathering in Chinese societies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Masculinity; Sociology; Gender studies; Democracy; Hegemonic masculinity; Hegemony; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.029041738101894296,"score_gpt":0.31833142643006523,"score_spread":0.2892896883281709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119087335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6636732,0.33120602,0.000116494695,0.0017462533,0.00035421885,0.00012649246,0.000003301172,0.0000048758984,0.0027691121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5533868,0.4440066,0.00024567492,0.0012821784,0.00042952702,0.000004407817,0.0000012312254,0.0000119497845,0.0006316072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977651,0.0010109025,0.0005165163,0.00017218565,0.00033373138,0.00020152655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986037,0.00048350918,0.00030761404,0.000100734374,0.00039766319,0.00010675972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033131535,0.0001542473,0.0004754834,0.000080845886,0.00026603008,0.00014191194,0.00015650406,0.00008899908,0.000045076602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014905032,0.000119732504,0.00013582033,0.0004127798,0.0002438265,0.00033385187,0.00007248622,0.00036170243,9.592763e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013490074,0.00055204896,0.13131908,0.0016237474,0.00062670955,0.00024985374,0.12978505,0.00004924622,0.0013535029,0.67084694,0.0040148688,0.059444033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018039583,0.00024195733,0.049219992,0.009633584,0.000485374,0.00027380648,0.33545536,0.00003308295,0.000024160687,0.5894745,0.012431281,0.000922959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019335837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000094346025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2056703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012565096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047761537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48825496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177695764","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12424","title":"Ethnic and diverse fathering: Moving research forward","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Family Dynamics and Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Diversity (politics); Immigration; Relevance (law); Sociology; Cultural diversity; Psychology; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Anthropology","score_opus":0.2398542402406454,"score_gpt":0.46178559303681016,"score_spread":0.22193135279616477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177695764","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10383859,0.8526984,0.0006622777,0.0032385883,0.00054984225,0.00021886932,0.000002467419,0.000011298007,0.03877967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1349464,0.8601429,0.001062006,0.0009771392,0.0002509514,0.0000022590032,5.428014e-7,0.0000126250625,0.0026051886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996893,0.00181403,0.00037606686,0.00011447873,0.00056842837,0.00023402905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980187,0.00088623253,0.00019480735,0.00014297104,0.0005971226,0.00016017478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011858437,0.000072518356,0.0002799018,0.00008810805,0.0004555109,0.000059987255,0.00022606594,0.000076474134,0.00009261491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021507135,0.000056359506,0.00015978882,0.00054117484,0.00026183017,0.00019535198,0.00009574346,0.00055972557,0.000017130029],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025644486,0.00011295109,0.0016497761,0.00096464186,0.000157856,0.00026469017,0.008223881,0.000012804119,0.00093377597,0.6773256,0.0050483495,0.30528006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006473582,0.0001696134,0.014203214,0.012910376,0.00031922082,0.00011311328,0.052631624,0.000042203978,0.000011698408,0.2146627,0.70390826,0.0003806052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023185266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045056415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69885993,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008713839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038020842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41099212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179787123","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12427","title":"Age‐dissimilar couple relationships: 25 years in review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Life course approach; Scholarship; Gender studies; Sociology; Human sexuality; Race (biology); Nationality; Social class; Inequality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Marital status; Power (physics); Psychology; Social science; Social psychology; Geography; Political science; Demography; Population; Immigration","score_opus":0.05100488695787477,"score_gpt":0.3517740607807134,"score_spread":0.30076917382283863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179787123","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007311016,0.96244234,0.00030639843,0.003879175,0.0006415997,0.00021457953,0.0000049366345,0.000007732087,0.025192223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028803214,0.9582552,0.00069743366,0.0102714915,0.00024517343,0.0000062996,0.0000075854205,0.000013207877,0.0017004162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679595,0.0015687324,0.0007930721,0.00013114455,0.0005205452,0.0001905554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985102,0.00036396066,0.00040191683,0.00018121066,0.00043635536,0.00010639771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007600502,0.00010312141,0.00047370594,0.000070675764,0.00015073159,0.000044254768,0.00029023818,0.00006353756,0.00036684488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025771416,0.00009348121,0.00030244864,0.0005611148,0.00007395273,0.00022404444,0.00003361445,0.00041511617,0.00002666415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013806498,0.0001905685,0.001562551,0.003728775,0.00012377648,0.001113866,0.002045927,0.00005813692,0.00037012107,0.8595695,0.08350368,0.047719285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019889422,0.00003068559,0.0058228867,0.05075957,0.00018432003,0.000044197874,0.0016903557,0.000011155951,0.000002076693,0.026711201,0.91432166,0.00022297168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015222915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018152368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8328583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016473615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006058504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4016694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280623190","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12456","title":"The procreative identities of men in same‐sex relationships choosing surrogacy: A new theoretical understanding","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Gender studies; Social psychology; Consciousness; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.1263579949449796,"score_gpt":0.3640384442898065,"score_spread":0.23768044934482688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280623190","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08508011,0.8607591,0.002227632,0.02421137,0.0003225766,0.0017599901,0.000005003505,0.000040571398,0.025593696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8732857,0.12521735,0.00043903085,0.00047262036,0.00008004816,0.000016840437,9.626277e-7,0.000015729996,0.00047170997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973491,0.0010202127,0.0008527882,0.00013025086,0.00045455148,0.0001931202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765503,0.001220975,0.0006521727,0.00027116857,0.00012721411,0.00007345687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007934235,0.000109060944,0.0005619649,0.00018587017,0.00025502563,0.000012472388,0.0002098368,0.000033602257,0.000068525405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042184703,0.000066306005,0.0001648446,0.0005132835,0.0003539959,0.00011457076,0.00008597268,0.00089922355,0.0000012474853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005057598,0.00008105607,0.005126586,0.00094217516,0.0001044302,0.00004116398,0.00096248736,0.000005494364,0.00013327687,0.975655,0.0034627581,0.012979777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008575203,0.0006333834,0.0051831743,0.004782899,0.00024537297,0.00043598693,0.028266093,0.000005823066,0.000110340756,0.95361763,0.005771304,0.000090495596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005605497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.2777897e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7882056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039997898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051832193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5050208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283712922","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12467","title":"Parental consideration of children's experiences: A critical review of parenting constructs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Empathy; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Developmental psychology; Autonomy; Perspective-taking; Social psychology; Parenting skills","score_opus":0.09256741346895579,"score_gpt":0.3933928075246969,"score_spread":0.3008253940557411,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283712922","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002927381,0.993981,0.00002318779,0.00009770605,0.0023516093,0.0007874709,0.00008514388,0.000006665496,0.0026379495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00008297108,0.9977043,0.00015433546,0.0015641542,0.00030110456,0.000043935568,0.000075381686,0.000028768634,0.000045009314],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99315965,0.0019058114,0.0036087586,0.0003193494,0.0007368848,0.00026952787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99495304,0.0008213763,0.0034771939,0.00031324846,0.0002950153,0.00014015226],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029063935,0.00041997744,0.0036217666,0.00017453247,0.00011477214,0.000013219839,0.00051584217,0.00012517677,0.006463775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000904019,0.0003035814,0.001691389,0.0004680502,0.0003267604,0.00010017843,0.000102144084,0.0006719353,0.000016557695],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015441681,0.0003200204,0.00002088528,0.23864666,0.0004612569,0.000023465054,0.00029300514,8.792477e-9,2.2207755e-7,0.0148304375,0.010483861,0.73490477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014882193,0.000093793875,0.000046096953,0.46899793,0.0011838017,0.000657501,0.0004126146,4.496259e-9,1.609698e-7,0.00044824876,0.52782255,0.00018848527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001939197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":8.649045e-8,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73471624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007618021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006725913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306784161","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12479","title":"Parent‐adolescent conflict processes and their measurement: A systematic review","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Duration (music); Quality (philosophy); Systematic review; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; MEDLINE; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.16791806196355272,"score_gpt":0.3663081150849953,"score_spread":0.19839005312144256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306784161","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.906687e-8,0.99283105,0.00003886571,0.00025045997,0.0014192775,0.0033965013,0.00005160475,0.000021717022,0.0019904075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000010128745,0.990815,0.000008901388,0.0080794105,0.00035035098,0.00022687216,0.000028439768,0.000069698865,0.0004203321],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99166447,0.0029993523,0.0034694602,0.000478286,0.000985641,0.00040280787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943406,0.00044864038,0.0039733537,0.00050871185,0.00045883068,0.00026985235],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007984827,0.00081346603,0.0063664704,0.00020515725,0.00020307764,0.00005229928,0.000875997,0.00014099134,0.0010190897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008582285,0.00046708863,0.0015526785,0.0006786315,0.00008837048,0.000093424,0.00013677306,0.0010616702,0.00009461961],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008526916,0.00023412007,3.165049e-7,0.68671167,0.00090476417,0.000027172333,0.000095935786,1.8379591e-9,2.049455e-8,0.0007401287,0.01775284,0.29352453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000115463525,0.000050915576,0.000003034208,0.49594888,0.0033059772,0.0005298136,0.00006951431,1.4691784e-9,3.553567e-9,0.00014783563,0.4995924,0.00023616775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":7.5398253e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.7752262e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48183954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002737114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008205185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362722592","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12499","title":"Critically feminizing family science: Using femme theory to generate novel approaches for the study of families and relationships","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Femininity; Relational theory; Psychology; Human sexuality; Gender studies; Promotion (chess); Feminist theory; Friendship; Field (mathematics); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Feminism; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.4125728911512745,"score_gpt":0.4161081050780253,"score_spread":0.0035352139267508242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362722592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86376435,0.11802441,0.010539922,0.0038302399,0.00067155674,0.00175608,0.000011500033,0.000022990345,0.0013789277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563671,0.040716216,0.0017902101,0.00075121934,0.00019771344,0.000021244437,1.8651576e-7,0.000014291903,0.00014184305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743336,0.0006475503,0.0006959309,0.00020720542,0.00068735523,0.0003286051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973756,0.0012086269,0.00033384206,0.00020191951,0.0007582705,0.000121707664],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023577474,0.00013745879,0.0004717737,0.00023277737,0.0017089898,0.00013936695,0.0005393974,0.0000370231,0.0000011785484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048035164,0.00008975646,0.00014664984,0.0012426472,0.00042651276,0.0002962143,0.00018348484,0.00020610748,0.0000023117084],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002627612,0.0008954991,0.008125455,0.002420507,0.0009688937,0.000013757595,0.1808745,0.0012567595,0.0084587,0.6230082,0.004745994,0.16896898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056409347,0.00034054733,0.036397833,0.0015592166,0.0007995386,0.000009832866,0.92534775,0.00013800782,0.000015384014,0.028559243,0.006017529,0.00025105488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004580373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034800047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7444732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006136461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030974118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366773660","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12507","title":"The rise of the childless single in South Korea","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Psychology; Young adult; Institution; Gender studies; Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Demography; Social science","score_opus":0.028562643859352272,"score_gpt":0.3089335774607699,"score_spread":0.2803709336014176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366773660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6509454,0.30409813,0.00009112486,0.007058629,0.0026793447,0.00054970774,0.00001327094,0.000015376489,0.034548983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89257824,0.10585468,0.000017681667,0.0007321292,0.00022186128,0.0000035204023,3.1867694e-7,0.0000088789875,0.0005826748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978615,0.0009100954,0.000517639,0.00006598497,0.0004741278,0.00017067009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987183,0.0003885175,0.00047387683,0.0001622372,0.00021925522,0.00003776447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006288439,0.00007196383,0.00022703147,0.00005062192,0.00028046756,0.0000355478,0.0005821036,0.00003447387,0.000011227782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00084534194,0.000036977868,0.00027246834,0.00058251055,0.00020646869,0.00007821426,0.000058538582,0.00019473299,0.0000074095133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034570585,0.00008335872,0.003973991,0.00023616309,0.0000861527,0.000013295542,0.011379328,0.00016887345,0.0009976481,0.89870644,0.004375197,0.07994497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080774515,0.00021654267,0.07389666,0.02171626,0.00030451172,0.00002056938,0.048654776,0.00017318981,0.00009114806,0.22736107,0.6262305,0.000527044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022740194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016986234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6713454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000697701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020847723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.217946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391779307","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12555","title":"<scp>FD</scp>/<scp>FR</scp> family: Functional disconnection and reconnection in public safety personnel families","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Resilience and Mental Health","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mental Health Research Canada; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Disconnection; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.05614262604067391,"score_gpt":0.35091559834796027,"score_spread":0.2947729723072864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391779307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53561026,0.4263144,0.0012522802,0.0005280012,0.0038069112,0.0005439748,0.000019224724,0.000057671856,0.031867266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51204324,0.47589526,0.00015252946,0.0041317446,0.0010961817,0.000070051334,0.000022743432,0.00007530758,0.006512935],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958391,0.0011755099,0.0013655404,0.0005384606,0.00048066198,0.0006006806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966213,0.0020816335,0.00052095257,0.00030512732,0.00016679385,0.0003041734],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052632033,0.00037095704,0.0008305641,0.00067968364,0.00027412627,0.00013519685,0.00025794603,0.00021317218,0.000118464326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007568261,0.0002888432,0.00038138434,0.00082760013,0.00018642355,0.0009709576,0.00005748417,0.0009799219,0.00018759814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017985368,0.0007930123,0.0045065624,0.006173288,0.00065646257,0.0003513327,0.011953351,0.000025968777,0.0022982752,0.12036469,0.10699529,0.7457019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014739077,0.0011801939,0.061415017,0.009931816,0.00034588136,0.0025238162,0.062075555,0.00006217667,0.000030459887,0.012286936,0.84849983,0.00017443454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008072555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004340123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7455275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003586438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029918447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400218588","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12572","title":"The recognition and the initial reaction to children's signals after experiencing maltreatment during childhood","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Jeunesse de Quebec; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Attribution; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Developmental psychology; Meaning (existential); Early childhood; History of childhood; Childhood abuse; Child abuse; Suicide prevention; Poison control; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Medicine; Psychiatry; Medical emergency","score_opus":0.030074889485235613,"score_gpt":0.3217128700407423,"score_spread":0.29163798055550666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400218588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6321661,0.3643901,0.000026301786,0.0010794223,0.0005297957,0.00041772018,0.000005175652,0.000013111335,0.00137228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875291,0.10919338,0.000019118394,0.0022983546,0.00076645176,0.000079159196,0.0000014021945,0.000021605792,0.00009147379],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828976,0.000612426,0.0005471361,0.00017379761,0.00019350108,0.0001833851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990025,0.00046620867,0.00018425506,0.00021066653,0.00005896191,0.00007739933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019049649,0.00015844045,0.0003023849,0.00007383506,0.00018522367,0.000102803926,0.00013539138,0.00003979659,0.00022759094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078198434,0.000074829964,0.00025167802,0.00017057257,0.00007525713,0.00015115799,0.000030173322,0.0003226859,0.00016226862],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012216908,0.00012690731,0.00004859448,0.00020034141,0.00090679113,0.0001956632,0.011637295,4.2201256e-7,0.00032972737,0.002202202,0.0011590868,0.98197126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018346338,0.0033179782,0.554957,0.12719096,0.009248135,0.03239689,0.019491354,0.000002033195,0.0028455637,0.09430326,0.13559267,0.002307843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000062916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016903012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97966343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042744286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027472413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30514774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402660439","doi":"10.1111/jftr.12590","title":"Bringing birth fathers to the forefront: A two‐decade scoping review of birth father experiences in adoption","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Medicine; Gerontology","score_opus":0.036995745221214696,"score_gpt":0.36739109579471185,"score_spread":0.33039535057349717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402660439","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025471948,0.9642019,0.0012097319,0.0041620475,0.0005026293,0.0008016779,0.0000017981187,0.00001793186,0.0036303133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14288592,0.85222054,0.00025430092,0.0040867906,0.0003638859,0.000025578971,3.66949e-7,0.000015473574,0.00014714604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974249,0.0007562393,0.0008739273,0.00016370993,0.00054458424,0.0002366651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989658,0.00025770898,0.0003922175,0.00017172578,0.00012283483,0.000089713576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007880705,0.00013747445,0.00050498644,0.00015413565,0.00013171945,0.000061913735,0.00042789508,0.000034956425,0.00024369004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000511741,0.00008450142,0.00031694368,0.00090879976,0.00010879354,0.00037801045,0.000040798182,0.0002460001,0.000018060706],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038704937,0.00007666947,0.00021087003,0.042006474,0.00008051527,0.000039053346,0.04585768,0.000056238307,0.00019736556,0.043326773,0.0022351868,0.86587447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001362134,0.00010191179,0.00023855391,0.7958409,0.00010086528,0.000020470472,0.011114382,0.0000082100305,0.000020398043,0.0017680586,0.19046487,0.00018515871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006218801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009599664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86568934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001137411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027763337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3445868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411515504","doi":"10.1111/jftr.70000","title":"The gendered division of housework in <scp>North America</scp>: A systematic review from 2014 to 2024","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Family Theory & Review","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Université de Moncton","keywords":"Scopus; PsycINFO; Systematic review; Empirical research; Division of labour; Psychology; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.0418635212750561,"score_gpt":0.35968389639447645,"score_spread":0.31782037511942035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411515504","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000025183526,0.98976105,0.00011864994,0.00027062272,0.0012717352,0.005093602,0.00006623088,0.000025355133,0.003390252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000017329941,0.99615055,0.00020928608,0.0015497748,0.00033381366,0.00025429224,0.000009138818,0.000065538945,0.0014258904],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800394,0.011893892,0.005116743,0.0005511024,0.001685532,0.00071328826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747574,0.016737528,0.0061877123,0.0014006842,0.00058579934,0.00033087522],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015863637,0.0007734284,0.009309065,0.0003832643,0.0002556723,0.00010690342,0.0034250757,0.00031307337,0.000060358703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01804267,0.0004453686,0.002346959,0.0028646616,0.0003205606,0.00019144906,0.00034616416,0.0014371788,0.00019788691],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020952914,0.000058636535,0.000010239636,0.693706,0.00037547908,0.000018731515,0.00052323716,5.7740147e-7,2.8705072e-8,0.0002501902,0.061948147,0.24310665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044960027,0.000039135615,0.000017045995,0.5225002,0.0023500684,0.000003197214,0.000741525,1.4174147e-8,4.181848e-9,0.00054434885,0.47365472,0.00010478064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055621786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016740545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41170657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052595185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018497697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}