{"meta":{"query_hash":"ab8c370d6268","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ab8c370d6268","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Forensic+Practice"},"results":[{"id":"W1541709579","doi":"10.1108/jfp-10-2013-0048","title":"The use of a structured guide to assess proxies of offending behaviours and change in custodial settings","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sanctions; Aggression; Proxy (statistics); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.15728002416048922,"score_gpt":0.4096251945462347,"score_spread":0.25234517038574544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541709579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5260915,0.0015653889,0.22313167,0.009624626,0.0011221592,0.14396124,0.019270238,0.005511945,0.069721155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20406443,0.0020312446,0.5766855,0.0026839394,0.000117644486,0.182127,0.008325431,0.0002844805,0.023680374],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825136,0.010947425,0.002518173,0.0008710445,0.0024929047,0.00065685774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9668641,0.012385191,0.005570366,0.003521189,0.009717106,0.0019419316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018436594,0.0011629675,0.0011270822,0.0042465343,0.0017918983,0.0023037144,0.002240918,0.001942953,0.0071038706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031951908,0.0008179531,0.0013047389,0.0019458474,0.001979615,0.0024809146,0.0041133403,0.003264387,0.0051595424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009545857,0.0047248816,0.12239946,0.0055331816,0.00012241668,0.0025889275,0.07706512,0.003287628,0.013708285,0.016516797,0.1801398,0.5729588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064329983,0.008187595,0.37194648,0.005335094,0.00008369996,0.004804864,0.087420054,0.011443475,0.0140900295,0.029337365,0.46588585,0.00082226115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033902957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009438634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018436594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023508754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008776433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097503185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021476905","doi":"10.1108/jfp-08-2012-0002","title":"Assessing attachment for family court decision making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Rigour; Originality; Psychology; Verifiable secret sharing; Family court; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Law; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.057260409237419256,"score_gpt":0.4175634960539957,"score_spread":0.3603030868165764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021476905","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21533856,0.012384983,0.39312872,0.08393236,0.0062315986,0.061401952,0.0029003,0.000906174,0.2237753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56645304,0.0056586307,0.36972708,0.006074754,0.0008127892,0.04258888,0.0013296038,0.00012812669,0.0072270324],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.67168546,0.27932507,0.020160517,0.0041713645,0.02179773,0.002859731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.632495,0.24108681,0.027236884,0.032638907,0.057908718,0.0086336415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.31145164,0.0009799658,0.001254803,0.00686873,0.008071378,0.010628256,0.004145529,0.0033188441,0.016847773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46058616,0.0011878862,0.0025343746,0.0030681854,0.0070461454,0.010937638,0.01452647,0.008872093,0.003709182],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010388674,0.0008155982,0.025670482,0.0026274258,0.00013965621,0.0010858866,0.057186086,0.0028688177,0.0012439165,0.09519308,0.05911331,0.7530169],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082062464,0.0032607254,0.09639944,0.037505038,0.00047596855,0.0030763699,0.069901615,0.017654784,0.0065553407,0.3787828,0.38436115,0.0012061987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005569484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0119360415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31145164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0102827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031222852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84910274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060838329","doi":"10.1108/jfp-09-2014-0031","title":"The therapeutic potential of a prison-based animal programme in the UK","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Thematic analysis; Originality; Exploratory research; Psychology; Unit (ring theory); Applied psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03950394372154843,"score_gpt":0.3663432215327644,"score_spread":0.32683927781121597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060838329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910019,0.0012428482,0.00028922132,0.0026353311,0.00006607289,0.00002279108,0.000016989568,0.000009878684,0.00471501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973527,0.0005916477,0.00029020614,0.000308598,0.00001764156,0.000018448234,0.0000075732846,0.000003935302,0.0014092583],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965546,0.0026809853,0.00007735569,0.000109450724,0.00020177005,0.00037587376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955864,0.0013975393,0.0013823776,0.00020435701,0.00024725668,0.0011820635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025864756,0.00020828386,0.00026224382,0.00057014177,0.005299959,0.0021450154,0.0007086344,0.0009787355,0.0032838883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004329156,0.00021069653,0.00015039062,0.00031066855,0.0060545597,0.0012110964,0.0042820494,0.0011490887,0.00023526028],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054495747,0.00047737028,0.08557186,0.0010512087,0.00004173893,0.012841523,0.8110255,0.00014775667,0.007460647,0.0074648275,0.006637323,0.06673534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015009323,0.0014936058,0.09376282,0.0011858019,0.000031713098,0.01023321,0.8245531,0.00015955209,0.00097021216,0.0011930537,0.06634707,0.000054788532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005807092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019197965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005807092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021245577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020630145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015414834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197948521","doi":"10.1108/jfp-10-2014-0040","title":"Are two views better than one? Investigating three-quarter view facial composites","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Witness; Suspect; Computer science; Recall; Identification (biology); Encoding (memory); Face (sociological concept); Facial recognition system; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Psychology","score_opus":0.1990452117641435,"score_gpt":0.3641557496243292,"score_spread":0.16511053786018567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197948521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98039323,0.0004863333,0.014147973,0.0002821633,0.00006182966,0.000094327275,0.00009567164,0.00008658607,0.0043518543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844074,0.00026878098,0.014209477,0.00014247172,0.000018724795,0.00002946147,0.00010325436,0.00004522393,0.0007750543],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979024,0.0008487436,0.000120344266,0.00034069832,0.0006813307,0.000106516665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724354,0.01983597,0.0032420026,0.0024755502,0.00161454,0.00039643998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039245156,0.00040637123,0.00038916024,0.00038442822,0.0003837232,0.0015105846,0.00050916866,0.0007362692,0.005669529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037132252,0.0003859464,0.0004592422,0.00022102303,0.0008755303,0.002252263,0.0009812957,0.0007696247,0.0004641706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0093749855,0.0011998395,0.11275254,0.0018789305,0.000272375,0.0019098129,0.01606579,0.0040005925,0.46957484,0.009994559,0.002669605,0.37030613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004946415,0.012897049,0.4908716,0.00130765,0.0015809399,0.012937924,0.029209308,0.055348616,0.34760144,0.022346117,0.02493586,0.00046890439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012005932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014918213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005669529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046409247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043323834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020755112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222634016","doi":"10.1108/jfp-05-2015-0029","title":"The impact of forensic work on home life: the role of emotional labour, segmentation/integration and social support","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Work (physics); Psychology; Perception; Relevance (law); Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Social support; Checklist; Preference; Work–family conflict; Applied psychology; Creativity; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03426125960743813,"score_gpt":0.3744750888646227,"score_spread":0.3402138292571846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222634016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9909106,0.0023229881,0.0003070006,0.0013837885,0.000050806557,0.000022635046,0.000044301716,0.0000045723805,0.0049533593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987796,0.0005655056,0.00020304183,0.000087675675,0.000017730836,0.0000103725915,0.00002908721,0.000002157701,0.00030475564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974681,0.0014406429,0.00016350822,0.00013164166,0.00043938804,0.0003567525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949038,0.0018995947,0.0016775563,0.00019560971,0.00029485527,0.0010286269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002050165,0.00031213308,0.000401669,0.0010851852,0.0016734957,0.0025403015,0.00081542623,0.00062896835,0.0051422184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007642553,0.0002119381,0.0005560899,0.0006837203,0.001475237,0.001147565,0.003467166,0.0009989176,0.00033270512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043935783,0.0008096181,0.83901644,0.00053105096,0.00026113467,0.0026075665,0.025759013,0.00021774131,0.00051785744,0.0016667867,0.0012467719,0.12692674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015404712,0.00035949892,0.91222274,0.00062724965,0.000065866036,0.002919644,0.07796186,0.00029876587,0.000243161,0.0017233762,0.003521269,0.00004111756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00193994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037153102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051422184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009484943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001192124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017202437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224132967","doi":"10.1108/jfp-03-2015-0024","title":"The relationship between trust in work colleagues, impact of boundary violations and burnout among staff within a forensic psychiatric service","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Emotional exhaustion; Burnout; Psychology; Mental health; Competence (human resources); Originality; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Applied psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03250542546706429,"score_gpt":0.29632585282546275,"score_spread":0.26382042735839845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224132967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99932325,0.00016204875,0.00004471739,0.00016862492,0.0000074110944,0.0000042989673,0.000008645612,8.037248e-7,0.00028015886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996896,0.000089524954,0.00005923059,0.000036147354,0.0000066020602,0.000005471463,0.000012540557,6.728515e-7,0.000100339144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969867,0.0012197866,0.00035372004,0.00015060235,0.00084555673,0.0004436931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9816622,0.0047329515,0.008592946,0.00058821385,0.0016628242,0.0027609682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003031574,0.00013121984,0.0002414415,0.0008576878,0.0016008705,0.0014890253,0.00046195206,0.0005516741,0.002680124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0184143,0.00034083592,0.0003226259,0.00045824322,0.0010893268,0.00081778277,0.0019099425,0.001282386,0.00026231335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012959079,0.00022691223,0.97653246,0.000102657985,0.000046957954,0.00021258571,0.012336775,0.00004154356,0.00029416787,0.00007575598,0.00033407912,0.009666531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004800987,0.00025172808,0.96833694,0.00015423399,0.000021565917,0.00068027055,0.029489404,0.00017519052,0.00012301673,0.000108793625,0.00063960534,0.0000144266405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006365256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008408614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006365256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014674657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001822044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016032636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336631130","doi":"10.1108/jfp-01-2015-0004","title":"Putting the Mr. Big technique back on trial: a re-examination of probative value and abuse of process through a scientific lens","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Value (mathematics); Big data; Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Compliance (psychology); Social psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08467167243363517,"score_gpt":0.404677419097778,"score_spread":0.32000574666414283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336631130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033184394,0.1883202,0.031198516,0.61487603,0.008534558,0.0003312393,0.00010516112,0.00008834147,0.12336156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7649075,0.11022702,0.024061088,0.08145775,0.009232759,0.00063539355,0.000072430186,0.00021122769,0.009194925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85003537,0.08811388,0.005076615,0.0065110815,0.04746558,0.0027974278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.52385026,0.41287336,0.017156119,0.018210784,0.025587475,0.0023219942],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2034111,0.000969478,0.0020054863,0.012816978,0.012742609,0.024834348,0.0054976554,0.010949839,0.002825152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22398897,0.00074021704,0.0014851672,0.0072232103,0.14528877,0.02961795,0.008124751,0.019615212,0.00063219294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102020495,0.0000635834,0.0020009736,0.0015980256,0.0000642331,0.00048191324,0.020530526,0.00025839693,0.00026951073,0.88945186,0.007713362,0.07746564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057533463,0.0003419806,0.005361136,0.013591479,0.00017929508,0.0010159222,0.033282578,0.0012289552,0.0018453574,0.68807876,0.2548778,0.00013934901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023510164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02541393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2034111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02654733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05700694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341321883","doi":"10.1108/jfp-01-2015-0010","title":"Question type and its effect on children's maintenance and accuracy during courtroom testimony","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Interview; Psychology; Originality; Recall; Assertion; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.012710589922117644,"score_gpt":0.33064112083989117,"score_spread":0.3179305309177735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341321883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994123,0.00012604531,0.00013375013,0.00002182187,0.0000029701089,0.000012953727,0.00002802855,0.000005022894,0.0002570719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988838,0.00011891542,0.00066927186,0.000016715163,0.0000033822196,0.000029050323,0.000069788395,0.0000048634947,0.00020416264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937733,0.0027998278,0.0010266138,0.00077927375,0.0012686972,0.0003523749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8879758,0.07803044,0.024035959,0.004966677,0.0035818215,0.0014092906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006325363,0.0003833543,0.00040445564,0.0005584967,0.00032722877,0.001401842,0.0005023841,0.0005486675,0.0021281585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06839354,0.0003802115,0.0005235156,0.00032125303,0.0006937033,0.0008072108,0.00092065387,0.00072921766,0.00031672182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033868158,0.00065813074,0.9200291,0.00035901362,0.0001566769,0.0007107545,0.01847844,0.00032541566,0.016506752,0.0001326212,0.00019852186,0.03905785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004193922,0.0018207519,0.9830267,0.000118201344,0.00013810891,0.001251382,0.005421863,0.00041102417,0.00689067,0.00013007593,0.00071345747,0.00003579945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022821669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030319141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006325363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004396591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049027684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033452094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602596225","doi":"10.1108/jfp-02-2017-0003","title":"Examining the portrayal of homophobic and non-homophobic aggression in print media through an integrated grounded behavioural linguistic inquiry (IGBLI) approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Originality; Aggression; Content analysis; Psychology; Representation (politics); Grounded theory; Social media; Social psychology; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Qualitative research; Computer science; Political science; Creativity","score_opus":0.06930138823125936,"score_gpt":0.31399164635645965,"score_spread":0.2446902581252003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602596225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9728756,0.00036420132,0.0052531236,0.0009729562,0.000040594372,0.00047398743,0.0001854218,0.000023978238,0.019810125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850995,0.0006041415,0.00990383,0.0004549398,0.000022983091,0.00064670655,0.00008843519,0.000014595252,0.003164797],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467826,0.0038952841,0.0002481132,0.00022184903,0.0007540644,0.00020258444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98551184,0.010103522,0.002514825,0.0005000874,0.0011402852,0.00022941775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005969178,0.00033623783,0.00027976758,0.004291516,0.002368499,0.003234098,0.00073839794,0.0008141797,0.002656111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015162851,0.0002885352,0.0002477201,0.0019830945,0.004383604,0.0022941302,0.0032559063,0.0010058613,0.00022538647],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110723144,0.00026819482,0.044348445,0.0009090019,0.00003537487,0.00067624764,0.8761363,0.00015613037,0.004420299,0.00847649,0.00084674294,0.06361615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009456392,0.0001862536,0.061329816,0.0006755428,0.000035363148,0.00037754737,0.9251148,0.00041667515,0.0015957922,0.002825796,0.007401016,0.0000320657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009139713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017706633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009139713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028554804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017889217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031568408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802664269","doi":"10.1108/jfp-11-2017-0049","title":"Psychosocial approaches for individuals with schizophrenia in correctional and forensic psychiatric settings: a rapid review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Schizophrenia research and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal; Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Psychosocial; Neurocognitive; Recidivism; Population; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Psychiatry; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Cognition; Intervention (counseling); Cognitive skill; Medicine","score_opus":0.06626014667721146,"score_gpt":0.3690870285901672,"score_spread":0.3028268819129557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802664269","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001359704,0.9995548,0.000018951388,0.00009562444,0.00004619547,0.000014111897,0.000014359082,0.0000013348922,0.00011865262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014199038,0.99825686,0.000114100854,0.00009120724,0.00004093818,0.000024095112,0.000014199559,6.1638025e-7,0.000038074646],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878997,0.0003758549,0.00042637935,0.00010906575,0.00024527934,0.000053448108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942311,0.004127848,0.00093142415,0.000066193184,0.00054605235,0.00009742255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018508153,0.0009073742,0.002019408,0.0058683087,0.00050481304,0.0015206019,0.0010847673,0.0013021587,0.003175939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006953907,0.00033742518,0.0013851653,0.0051433844,0.00047882457,0.0013412966,0.00085276365,0.000923933,0.00036538672],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115697454,0.000058047648,0.0006731526,0.49217847,0.0007441679,0.00024622478,0.00036521463,0.00013536701,0.0002980721,0.00083555304,0.006170637,0.4981794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010154879,0.00046850657,0.00925773,0.71966666,0.007826064,0.004001981,0.0014267558,0.00014377738,0.00040915422,0.00088755705,0.25574625,0.00006395807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041876133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010533762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0058683087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013517992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049288603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010624588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808874974","doi":"10.1108/jfp-02-2018-0003","title":"The sequencing of interventions with offenders: views of offender managers and supervisors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Thematic analysis; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Originality; Medical education; Applied psychology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.08829820102992535,"score_gpt":0.37558692527948995,"score_spread":0.2872887242495646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808874974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.941696,0.004147407,0.0070030866,0.035411432,0.00021740736,0.00036527406,0.00004992997,0.00009831903,0.011011105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98904794,0.0024165462,0.003911769,0.0027566983,0.00008857054,0.00027886932,0.00002025692,0.0000223831,0.0014570019],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9241138,0.06494708,0.0022258037,0.0010986933,0.004581986,0.0030326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90289724,0.06714979,0.010799526,0.0020676164,0.007879423,0.009206367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04916194,0.00047046883,0.0004762141,0.00088934245,0.006621544,0.0052745747,0.0016582973,0.0020165318,0.001882263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.093208365,0.00067013333,0.00048018256,0.0003969322,0.0056563644,0.0033830225,0.004136464,0.004074001,0.0002602678],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027681066,0.00024063262,0.024070019,0.0010588451,0.000058487785,0.0011871414,0.8967346,0.00038856847,0.0022337309,0.0018971461,0.0036211626,0.06823294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040725317,0.0010945695,0.011636224,0.001882974,0.00005510277,0.0010606342,0.95596564,0.00042730634,0.0012086086,0.0015038366,0.025058793,0.00006568431],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003347323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041167345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04916194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004374558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008238914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2599963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964585637","doi":"10.1108/jfp-04-2019-0012","title":"Improving continuity of forensic mental health care","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Mental health; Legislation; Continuity of care; Focus group; Quarter (Canadian coin); Health care; Mental illness; Nursing; Psychology; Best practice; Medical education; Medicine; Psychiatry; Business; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.020667205769674832,"score_gpt":0.3842665782573616,"score_spread":0.36359937248768676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964585637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7380476,0.022312716,0.051286537,0.093672484,0.0016466415,0.0016928662,0.000664047,0.00097342726,0.08970368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96423197,0.003834032,0.026248286,0.0022330517,0.00023545577,0.00026775204,0.0002556143,0.00003689458,0.0026569178],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.989974,0.0060372157,0.0008580498,0.00057309633,0.00132502,0.0012325459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744527,0.008313762,0.0047854283,0.0026078087,0.0032402342,0.0066000246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012368031,0.00021270596,0.0003737429,0.0014040358,0.003052572,0.003428861,0.0018387432,0.0012254571,0.0052702078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03778393,0.0002813031,0.0004103692,0.0010949678,0.0008921097,0.0036648607,0.005450172,0.0016497705,0.0006458517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002909294,0.00089014036,0.15352531,0.0017076283,0.00013787742,0.0015028219,0.025420524,0.001089001,0.001715347,0.010422478,0.025232475,0.77806544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044454625,0.0030719682,0.44824645,0.0137511715,0.0004332469,0.013832776,0.12623152,0.0071310005,0.005400519,0.050641943,0.33043867,0.00037614768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002937149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034582217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012368031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028236532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00997292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06540924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020146614","doi":"10.1108/jfp-01-2020-0002","title":"Designing a forensic mental health service delivery model: a multi-professional approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Originality; Service delivery framework; Psychology; Rehabilitation; Social work; Mental illness; Service (business); Nursing; Medicine; Medical education; Business; Psychiatry; Political science; Social psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.08866037329915621,"score_gpt":0.3697661438435883,"score_spread":0.2811057705444321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020146614","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32003927,0.0061709215,0.41475192,0.10445339,0.0008887902,0.025076173,0.0006493592,0.0010029025,0.12696734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5281646,0.004284347,0.4505338,0.0027243383,0.00007796934,0.0059357374,0.0002822246,0.000093823495,0.007903217],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97773576,0.01656313,0.0009509243,0.0008525429,0.0025209854,0.0013766347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98733586,0.0050709434,0.0010487625,0.0005892562,0.0035724365,0.0023827285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027508693,0.0007174863,0.00045310776,0.0044365823,0.009892186,0.011175243,0.0033831112,0.0021349143,0.0034391482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01885079,0.0008156815,0.0010544328,0.0027971484,0.004425251,0.0063320114,0.0071555725,0.0027485997,0.0007559209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023068627,0.0020990178,0.040326603,0.004552735,0.00018671375,0.0025186078,0.1981333,0.018576937,0.0027875453,0.25913745,0.030813605,0.44063675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040637716,0.0019860263,0.018742677,0.010238783,0.00037760937,0.0020588331,0.53832465,0.055169046,0.0028064302,0.09942957,0.2701203,0.0003395839],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072514735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14671727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072514735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03858606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.106860474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27996284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180000962","doi":"10.1108/jfp-02-2021-0004","title":"“That’s the way my Wednesdays always go”: reverse-order instructions insufficient to mitigate schema-consistent errors in alibi generation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Alibi; Schema (genetic algorithms); Recall; Psychology; Mnemonic; Originality; Social psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.0572796402303015,"score_gpt":0.33967404220425906,"score_spread":0.28239440197395754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180000962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8452323,0.00060078397,0.13797872,0.0017558169,0.00018852638,0.002431888,0.00025939863,0.0021840732,0.009368563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7802798,0.0006593717,0.21218613,0.0013492667,0.00005270189,0.0022511028,0.00036744704,0.00025407277,0.0026000976],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810075,0.014647807,0.0011361954,0.0009627502,0.001870333,0.00037544002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84173167,0.11768487,0.013160036,0.019488169,0.0068546915,0.0010805124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027198717,0.0008047846,0.00038413587,0.0006446661,0.0006214583,0.001503628,0.0016068117,0.001111099,0.0035654674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17608191,0.00068866357,0.00039512914,0.0004528165,0.0010651306,0.0023848608,0.0014559522,0.0014165774,0.0015522742],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002744749,0.0020520336,0.09016047,0.0033331786,0.0001605872,0.001283678,0.13467637,0.0027068898,0.04982479,0.007667093,0.010521066,0.6948691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022139044,0.017682364,0.23659393,0.009834495,0.001439916,0.009904603,0.1402268,0.06915485,0.17520781,0.030718353,0.3060102,0.0010128987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001250091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015699355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027198717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006668218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019499952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14384228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210819885","doi":"10.1108/jfp-06-2021-0035","title":"The bias in judgement: when “naïve” knowledge challenges expert knowledge in criminal trials","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean; Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Normative; Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Cognition; Judicial opinion; Originality; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Criminal justice; Social psychology; Management science; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Criminology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.2656472454443383,"score_gpt":0.45714908826108525,"score_spread":0.19150184281674693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210819885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6977682,0.0049299477,0.07757935,0.07081746,0.0014970633,0.00061928784,0.000101915604,0.00014656433,0.1465402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916244,0.00031593163,0.0043674847,0.0026292822,0.00020993185,0.00011161684,0.000019773031,0.000020266738,0.0007011787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8254329,0.11788845,0.008867509,0.009356586,0.0323642,0.0060903365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6229743,0.2948938,0.032297954,0.024051415,0.019693868,0.0060887565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1253204,0.0003804697,0.0011327151,0.004662484,0.00487688,0.011915847,0.0023037011,0.0069624837,0.003971474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49141595,0.00062953564,0.0006657271,0.0021201547,0.02668631,0.017072517,0.012514354,0.005627679,0.00056576054],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013299463,0.00036100665,0.11155501,0.001443526,0.00036972488,0.0040691253,0.25059542,0.0029669174,0.0025769232,0.36188346,0.010268913,0.25258005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011968348,0.00036324072,0.041046146,0.002141343,0.00011626745,0.0025899345,0.08328579,0.0061443513,0.0017098427,0.8410481,0.021195013,0.00024025283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035810934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038320175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1253204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045596748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060042357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66276556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281791128","doi":"10.1108/jfp-06-2021-0034","title":"Developing immersive videos to train social cognition in individuals with schizophrenia in forensic psychiatry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Schizophrenia research and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Originality; Mental health; Anger; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Cognitive psychology; Generalization; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Creativity","score_opus":0.027882565772292547,"score_gpt":0.3311208225223967,"score_spread":0.3032382567501042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281791128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9480909,0.0009467472,0.035806865,0.0013067933,0.00023514262,0.0014971982,0.00021173281,0.00039612054,0.011508422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92283267,0.0015415293,0.07050377,0.00046556478,0.00006558275,0.0013813007,0.00020323168,0.00004101227,0.0029653586],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933404,0.00040074502,0.000029479577,0.000050826864,0.00008184235,0.0001030826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998487,0.00088881864,0.00016354199,0.00010831755,0.00009500018,0.00025727047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015137792,0.00062112254,0.00017080974,0.00037243403,0.00042920726,0.0005812916,0.0006584254,0.0006844048,0.004813221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046195467,0.00018661699,0.0005111227,0.000107882675,0.00059553504,0.00086649606,0.0014724573,0.0006792406,0.0006030299],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011923045,0.011139599,0.023458628,0.004045368,0.00013265263,0.0038808505,0.044631097,0.008735937,0.09161201,0.0044709696,0.010017424,0.79668325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030183461,0.06945404,0.16045047,0.008671209,0.0008168758,0.019292466,0.11290722,0.034212448,0.16387847,0.024729986,0.4017048,0.00086372305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005130402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017043175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004813221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035684134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081162737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016101837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395456853","doi":"10.1108/jfp-01-2024-0002","title":"Self-harm and aggression in women who committed a criminal offence: a scoping review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Suicide and Self-Harm Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Aggression; Harm; PsycINFO; Psychology; Population; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Social psychology; Medicine; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.08611062260403568,"score_gpt":0.44917605948164896,"score_spread":0.3630654368776133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395456853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010237747,0.998028,0.000050891213,0.00026860388,0.00010334568,0.000083684856,0.000072156276,0.0000024259605,0.00036717474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007992365,0.9910368,0.0002408854,0.0003209293,0.0000759602,0.00017112329,0.00007536972,0.00000243321,0.00008425156],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930038,0.0021377434,0.00287623,0.00048931886,0.0012833037,0.0002095723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942658,0.04699472,0.0062105604,0.00054743356,0.0032219961,0.00036732573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076745455,0.00096650695,0.0036435782,0.019275315,0.0012263131,0.0044561597,0.001383209,0.0028650137,0.0028870956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04849607,0.0008918471,0.0030833022,0.016538186,0.0015271867,0.0028597058,0.001963949,0.0015422778,0.00034806097],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095918534,0.00005377552,0.0041857595,0.8125742,0.0021534665,0.00048034432,0.0023704977,0.00011592526,0.00017355887,0.0010502685,0.0038413417,0.172905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011699322,0.00007090954,0.005096393,0.96664155,0.0046515195,0.0008186183,0.0016039106,0.000037978934,0.000065855624,0.00030827976,0.020672271,0.000020962263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010551838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02260111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019275315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030282466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011889142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040587366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}