{"meta":{"query_hash":"ab8c370d6268","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ab8c370d6268","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Forensic+Practice"},"results":[{"id":"W1541709579","doi":"10.1108/jfp-10-2013-0048","title":"The use of a structured guide to assess proxies of offending behaviours and change in custodial settings","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sanctions; Aggression; Proxy (statistics); Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.15728002416048922,"score_gpt":0.4096251945462347,"score_spread":0.25234517038574544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1541709579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9634687,0.0010259117,0.0001846778,0.004908022,0.028982716,0.00051060435,0.000027224742,0.000010665983,0.0008815141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97487795,0.00004463937,0.023072785,0.0006909966,0.0011614056,0.00001259573,0.0000020110226,0.000047054105,0.00009057403],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695253,0.000495983,0.00122403,0.00024049498,0.00067825336,0.00040868772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481845,0.001496739,0.0023212517,0.0004087036,0.0007047805,0.000250071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027779357,0.00023367708,0.0005672296,0.00044155194,0.00006546387,0.000066850705,0.00035638473,0.00014694946,0.000008511329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004159536,0.00017314912,0.000106589105,0.0004988465,0.00023085372,0.0010213287,0.00011148642,0.00056465436,0.0000019629167],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011510666,0.0008875678,0.13019098,0.000114998475,0.00089052797,0.0005398859,0.08389559,0.00006451194,0.0050386745,0.0098679215,0.62519705,0.13180165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01523044,0.008508148,0.55027807,0.0019307093,0.0015774273,0.010115593,0.072690085,0.00015458117,0.004494874,0.0030797685,0.3305508,0.0013895181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063873845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041349413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4200871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001271082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016443408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7060816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021476905","doi":"10.1108/jfp-08-2012-0002","title":"Assessing attachment for family court decision making","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Rigour; Originality; Psychology; Verifiable secret sharing; Family court; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Law; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.057260409237419256,"score_gpt":0.4175634960539957,"score_spread":0.3603030868165764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021476905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82886064,0.0021726396,0.1084165,0.010175604,0.0053094584,0.00051737716,0.0000026484036,0.000027529739,0.04451758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91790134,0.00003456084,0.078487754,0.0026641358,0.0007684679,0.0000074518907,6.0999696e-7,0.000022268707,0.000113423026],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985939,0.00009859307,0.00056844234,0.00014757685,0.0003357929,0.00025568178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545413,0.0027780884,0.0008962346,0.00021689318,0.000567239,0.00008738675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010363305,0.00012516405,0.00025020738,0.00012895923,0.000118672884,0.00022563197,0.00017523947,0.000097310825,0.0003540402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081618846,0.00009779675,0.00017985619,0.000103530176,0.00003163681,0.0016150973,0.000025410289,0.00037290595,0.00017443429],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050035573,0.0003528554,0.0007715517,0.00001017568,0.00035848125,0.00013121039,0.0009885718,0.000031385975,0.00047042512,0.0022456446,0.19236645,0.8017729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0077566407,0.0015463695,0.3569104,0.0010717344,0.0009931957,0.005880225,0.017059756,0.00043155506,0.00030960207,0.014490335,0.5929721,0.0005780797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022840988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000027048736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8011948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007814304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006211561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3988036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060838329","doi":"10.1108/jfp-09-2014-0031","title":"The therapeutic potential of a prison-based animal programme in the UK","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Human-Animal Interaction Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Prison; Thematic analysis; Originality; Exploratory research; Psychology; Unit (ring theory); Applied psychology; Criminology; Social psychology; Qualitative research; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.03950394372154843,"score_gpt":0.3663432215327644,"score_spread":0.32683927781121597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060838329","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9809242,0.004755897,0.0010502164,0.010810077,0.00043592165,0.00023695952,0.000001981413,0.0000026494038,0.0017820812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793696,0.00010364748,0.00095502596,0.0006923099,0.00026179393,0.0000050076987,9.95103e-7,0.000008035384,0.000036220783],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998727,0.00029081485,0.00038874938,0.00008622793,0.0003416118,0.00016557302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819,0.00025102933,0.00066873245,0.00018395894,0.00066587963,0.000040437633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017260165,0.00009189922,0.00013724441,0.00003570831,0.0000666637,0.000049020167,0.0002554387,0.000052303767,0.0000027412543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016182747,0.00004885213,0.00012064488,0.00009567492,0.00014344936,0.00001617359,0.000039328293,0.00025572212,0.0000023726125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.044977047,0.0034497136,0.0133811245,0.00008074207,0.0033685218,0.0005594,0.007216453,0.0011732811,0.69403327,0.0034393438,0.12549856,0.10282256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061194417,0.013605162,0.019434255,0.00009968013,0.0007298526,0.0028596749,0.044633288,0.00054882717,0.0973615,0.0008499389,0.81330717,0.00045121706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025967749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007641682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6878086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002371138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021044324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1992132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197948521","doi":"10.1108/jfp-10-2014-0040","title":"Are two views better than one? Investigating three-quarter view facial composites","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Face Recognition and Perception","field":"Neuroscience","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Witness; Suspect; Computer science; Recall; Identification (biology); Encoding (memory); Face (sociological concept); Facial recognition system; Artificial intelligence; Pattern recognition (psychology); Psychology","score_opus":0.1990452117641435,"score_gpt":0.3641557496243292,"score_spread":0.16511053786018567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197948521","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9588865,0.00017875375,0.0016780656,0.029158361,0.001163282,0.00020037452,0.000009906287,0.000033864228,0.008690895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696382,0.00005681269,0.010374306,0.019050231,0.00081734196,0.0000026277287,0.0000016776572,0.000018676086,0.000040100935],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799275,0.0004594594,0.00052978843,0.00016985087,0.00063440826,0.00021374413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972581,0.0005271357,0.0014316267,0.00014286855,0.00037345395,0.00026676475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095491455,0.00014861592,0.00029111723,0.00011271413,0.00012342639,0.00016471211,0.0001801176,0.000060932332,0.000085147025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037595998,0.00012094853,0.00012688218,0.0002055515,0.00016953358,0.0016558494,0.000029629246,0.0005554633,0.0003074593],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094177696,0.0010492869,0.025393322,0.0001616648,0.00014073297,0.00062338606,0.007857227,0.00021935276,0.61673653,0.0006844064,0.08306418,0.2631281],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012888371,0.0031762342,0.04271488,0.0027096937,0.0012382433,0.015109997,0.00960841,0.0042318003,0.21366331,0.028458338,0.6641422,0.0020585046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023148614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011372274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58107805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006778816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008098616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49321377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222634016","doi":"10.1108/jfp-05-2015-0029","title":"The impact of forensic work on home life: the role of emotional labour, segmentation/integration and social support","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Emotional Labor in Professions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Work (physics); Psychology; Perception; Relevance (law); Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Social support; Checklist; Preference; Work–family conflict; Applied psychology; Creativity; Political science; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03426125960743813,"score_gpt":0.3744750888646227,"score_spread":0.3402138292571846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222634016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.961142,0.00041946035,0.00013324057,0.028440276,0.00091364596,0.00023512117,0.000033389468,0.0000069271264,0.008675943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747473,0.00013151283,0.0013632915,0.00023387813,0.0005554226,0.0000019398974,0.0000039670363,0.000008177925,0.00022708288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744517,0.000729565,0.00050804287,0.00007844614,0.0010645014,0.00017425929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99420506,0.0022997176,0.001450717,0.00010408634,0.0018254119,0.000115030685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037317234,0.000095802665,0.00019027728,0.00007220675,0.0005594135,0.00006262008,0.00022713003,0.000083019055,0.000044130767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004858309,0.000051629093,0.00014141823,0.00034726717,0.0005358079,0.0007050892,0.000035108995,0.00037543455,0.00000396367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028199486,0.00065348484,0.024612667,0.000013299568,0.00084568723,0.000011188171,0.070880644,0.00042392747,0.00091304036,0.7387283,0.07528359,0.084814236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029798097,0.0024260387,0.35012022,0.00029419866,0.00053701224,0.00014763804,0.29686213,0.00008996913,0.0015982199,0.31829616,0.026278727,0.0003698526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002984072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012605992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42043212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017874545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013803148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5816201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224132967","doi":"10.1108/jfp-03-2015-0024","title":"The relationship between trust in work colleagues, impact of boundary violations and burnout among staff within a forensic psychiatric service","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alpha Technologies (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Emotional exhaustion; Burnout; Psychology; Mental health; Competence (human resources); Originality; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Applied psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.03250542546706429,"score_gpt":0.29632585282546275,"score_spread":0.26382042735839845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224132967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947634,0.00050663704,0.00017304043,0.0031211567,0.0003844405,0.00019855774,0.000004259797,0.000012607502,0.00083590916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976015,0.000015383868,0.0016200233,0.00017119199,0.0005107676,0.0000016300928,0.000008181456,0.000021137726,0.00005016574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840176,0.00007466185,0.0007800515,0.000113495524,0.0004667359,0.00016331694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961187,0.0010432471,0.0015416632,0.00013512424,0.0011126504,0.000048569113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015968053,0.00014204856,0.00025220742,0.0003843472,0.0002544572,0.00027246177,0.00015108817,0.00008620728,0.000014133206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003840426,0.00010012521,0.00008105204,0.0017442914,0.000096760195,0.0026687214,0.00005670537,0.0004384136,0.000012067198],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025015353,0.00005117613,0.99287575,0.000012687418,0.00004842558,0.000006066573,0.00037525684,0.00026405766,0.0000033074664,0.0021416408,0.003150919,0.00082054664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012251406,0.00006359605,0.989303,0.00007675891,0.00026756225,0.000038107843,0.0021114151,0.00012920059,0.0000019145236,0.0050505083,0.0016224972,0.00011030112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006861895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006913445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035727648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013738793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031245814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4597626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336631130","doi":"10.1108/jfp-01-2015-0004","title":"Putting the Mr. Big technique back on trial: a re-examination of probative value and abuse of process through a scientific lens","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Psychology of Social Influence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Confession (law); Value (mathematics); Big data; Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Compliance (psychology); Social psychology; Law; Criminology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.08467167243363517,"score_gpt":0.404677419097778,"score_spread":0.32000574666414283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336631130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94560343,0.00017099094,0.0010356816,0.020338193,0.0009206845,0.0011195734,0.0000054915736,0.000012913127,0.030793015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350184,0.0002425554,0.0056658667,0.00022882441,0.00021455255,0.000009827069,8.825235e-8,0.000008162989,0.00012827876],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974177,0.00094518653,0.000568652,0.00016571881,0.0007165472,0.00018619555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992861,0.002696827,0.0025303145,0.00016252647,0.0017085255,0.00004084377],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007908046,0.000092438626,0.00024896162,0.00011094191,0.00032854738,0.00004657341,0.00031812087,0.00012071519,0.0000065493946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01375658,0.00005451504,0.000068859736,0.00062829437,0.001996304,0.0015400448,0.000021649788,0.00025355525,0.00000240847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012160144,0.0022372615,0.00069974567,0.00022638681,0.0006057018,0.00003586231,0.6064195,0.000024299903,0.07674568,0.13190697,0.0073089185,0.16162951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.047650274,0.011853631,0.021106562,0.009429262,0.0013726463,0.00040934084,0.18236431,0.000016943583,0.23213136,0.350149,0.14233749,0.0011791787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008548696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006929325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4240552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093702125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041677017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99455094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341321883","doi":"10.1108/jfp-01-2015-0010","title":"Question type and its effect on children's maintenance and accuracy during courtroom testimony","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Interview; Psychology; Originality; Recall; Assertion; Value (mathematics); Order (exchange); Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; Law; Mathematics; Statistics; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.012710589922117644,"score_gpt":0.33064112083989117,"score_spread":0.3179305309177735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341321883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861777,0.0006817722,0.0004675633,0.006436601,0.0022686503,0.00016195636,0.0000048033603,0.00003245309,0.0037685358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971183,0.00035043998,0.00034140705,0.00069281564,0.00047050705,0.0000023857692,4.4403623e-7,0.000019946316,0.0010037594],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862945,0.0003399946,0.00036292046,0.00023603691,0.00020124066,0.00023035766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719673,0.0014066559,0.00068377686,0.00018597665,0.00037039068,0.00015645234],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082268164,0.0001642492,0.00026028295,0.0001894225,0.00009262085,0.000032685068,0.00008584453,0.00012997276,0.00014323756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051983474,0.00010410795,0.000047838796,0.00015780213,0.00012360391,0.0005203961,0.00002604522,0.0003620457,0.00013015942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01798469,0.00041637273,0.0140937455,0.000031803625,0.00093784754,0.0007076819,0.00083701534,0.000009024652,0.027912349,0.014524384,0.07231557,0.8502295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012161918,0.009350674,0.8896544,0.00056491187,0.00036332253,0.043105226,0.00019606602,0.000013115809,0.0047633797,0.0013719073,0.037956715,0.0004983597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004946462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000014006174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87556064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004986359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002056936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6223283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2602596225","doi":"10.1108/jfp-02-2017-0003","title":"Examining the portrayal of homophobic and non-homophobic aggression in print media through an integrated grounded behavioural linguistic inquiry (IGBLI) approach","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Newspaper; Originality; Aggression; Content analysis; Psychology; Representation (politics); Grounded theory; Social media; Social psychology; Sociology; Media studies; Social science; Qualitative research; Computer science; Political science; Creativity","score_opus":0.06930138823125936,"score_gpt":0.31399164635645965,"score_spread":0.2446902581252003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2602596225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9612649,0.000363677,0.035512906,0.00035319163,0.0016734393,0.00016027063,7.990814e-7,0.000016214559,0.0006546075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91211295,0.00028096896,0.08728329,0.00006389357,0.00023449915,0.00000310514,0.0000014155473,0.000012511789,0.000007333305],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791545,0.00028170468,0.00069676037,0.0002788822,0.0005539224,0.0002732885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961611,0.00042789892,0.0020792773,0.00071916525,0.00049102935,0.000121529854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024071713,0.00019398263,0.00036614004,0.00016886335,0.0003250764,0.0004037108,0.0009526472,0.00012856898,0.0000021488843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002766059,0.00012856339,0.000072009105,0.0002409942,0.00030026137,0.0027746642,0.00023114494,0.00087400235,0.0000011104923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023165022,0.0025159076,0.025390416,0.00021404387,0.00037294044,0.004118908,0.130628,0.00038878567,0.022804312,0.0055843648,0.00040722254,0.8052586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010670469,0.006498452,0.82475317,0.004016718,0.00076856127,0.023103608,0.031083578,0.043627415,0.03841189,0.013244486,0.002110548,0.0017111232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006120929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008787915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8035475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007941637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024791033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5242663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802664269","doi":"10.1108/jfp-11-2017-0049","title":"Psychosocial approaches for individuals with schizophrenia in correctional and forensic psychiatric settings: a rapid review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Schizophrenia research and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal; Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Psychosocial; Neurocognitive; Recidivism; Population; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Psychiatry; Psychology; Clinical psychology; Cognition; Intervention (counseling); Cognitive skill; Medicine","score_opus":0.06626014667721146,"score_gpt":0.3690870285901672,"score_spread":0.3028268819129557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802664269","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006810938,0.9918336,0.00009047611,0.0040884144,0.00054045074,0.002922628,0.00006223438,0.000013714413,0.0003803599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000010462324,0.8990229,0.098284535,0.0005102687,0.0017975613,0.00018205255,0.00006838388,0.000077873796,0.00004599029],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99600637,0.00044769363,0.001509156,0.0005156665,0.0010147673,0.00050635875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939479,0.0018556608,0.0028465204,0.00030878093,0.0006511811,0.00038991336],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002927225,0.0005800471,0.0028115732,0.00083447935,0.00014698479,0.0000833277,0.00021146462,0.00031497353,0.000029529814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032364766,0.00036286298,0.00073132926,0.0009901897,0.00024496505,0.00044870956,0.000054963013,0.0013664996,0.0000118907665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062861233,0.0004245959,0.00003456738,0.021737965,0.0018570494,0.00013156621,0.000049996943,4.7869236e-8,1.0538745e-8,0.00017154559,0.043457534,0.925849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008011531,0.0041962587,0.00011074045,0.06810198,0.010477385,0.020601187,0.000107760075,0.0000031839731,4.30302e-7,0.00040399842,0.8876535,0.00033203908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000052796404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002641229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92551696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031772253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026252952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808874974","doi":"10.1108/jfp-02-2018-0003","title":"The sequencing of interventions with offenders: views of offender managers and supervisors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychological intervention; Thematic analysis; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Originality; Medical education; Applied psychology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.08829820102992535,"score_gpt":0.37558692527948995,"score_spread":0.2872887242495646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808874974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8426612,0.009820023,0.009411702,0.006452402,0.048391894,0.0006666921,0.000018546405,0.000031539555,0.08254601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98831743,0.00020958629,0.010033713,0.0003462384,0.00074607116,0.000003600126,8.780956e-7,0.000039813218,0.0003026626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972464,0.0004548216,0.0012156,0.00023014525,0.00050950993,0.0003435552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948531,0.0011779385,0.002568675,0.0005388978,0.0007285571,0.00013285222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024474156,0.00022381343,0.0005150329,0.00028487283,0.00016369509,0.00003784019,0.00039578078,0.000098816054,0.000090062684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007200688,0.00014420951,0.0002488129,0.0004400109,0.00095482287,0.0006447656,0.00006735106,0.0004708946,0.000009813527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015602408,0.0019275985,0.01102695,0.0010375477,0.0114568,0.00048653467,0.075999126,0.000041748288,0.008181427,0.08412315,0.5904134,0.1997033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.018881978,0.031252705,0.04741566,0.0066884123,0.00655835,0.023950482,0.5943312,0.000279974,0.0070467326,0.015626011,0.2461042,0.0018643006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008783647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017670951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51833206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007652935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012407183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5880693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964585637","doi":"10.1108/jfp-04-2019-0012","title":"Improving continuity of forensic mental health care","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blueprint; Mental health; Legislation; Continuity of care; Focus group; Quarter (Canadian coin); Health care; Mental illness; Nursing; Psychology; Best practice; Medical education; Medicine; Psychiatry; Business; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.020667205769674832,"score_gpt":0.3842665782573616,"score_spread":0.36359937248768676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964585637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9718452,0.0036395346,0.00045354906,0.0064952993,0.006397059,0.00039826534,0.000035246692,0.000016991775,0.010718832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99055344,0.00006499675,0.0074005364,0.0013713494,0.00033977395,8.9325323e-7,0.0000040045707,0.000025448266,0.00023958285],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997206,0.000470631,0.0010788278,0.00021906565,0.00062357413,0.00040193554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99503255,0.0009716561,0.0025520653,0.0004019312,0.0008141501,0.00022764852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019732916,0.00016384688,0.00058273465,0.00020171615,0.00008907898,0.000025893409,0.00025554327,0.00015303776,0.00016645175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012895489,0.0001293798,0.0002350176,0.00019324031,0.00008697897,0.0003574627,0.00005427115,0.0007448909,0.000079986305],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015836137,0.0002670131,0.0012093509,0.0001690403,0.0003065478,0.0005616455,0.020651352,0.0000069528824,0.0006203159,0.0011896922,0.011865713,0.9615688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.016813809,0.015863486,0.06363015,0.0027938623,0.0004717905,0.043900006,0.34790856,0.000102792364,0.0022180043,0.0015987024,0.50349224,0.0012065837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005652457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006853056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9603622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022172021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005989818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5275955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020146614","doi":"10.1108/jfp-01-2020-0002","title":"Designing a forensic mental health service delivery model: a multi-professional approach","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Ottawa Mental Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Mental health; Originality; Service delivery framework; Psychology; Rehabilitation; Social work; Mental illness; Service (business); Nursing; Medicine; Medical education; Business; Psychiatry; Political science; Social psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.08866037329915621,"score_gpt":0.3697661438435883,"score_spread":0.2811057705444321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020146614","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10864999,0.012840515,0.48333564,0.19351207,0.1743897,0.0028246443,0.00022041718,0.000499022,0.023728002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3860728,0.00012098562,0.54990226,0.059318837,0.0040573934,0.000022071452,0.000044616416,0.00020022811,0.00026083563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947367,0.0008489914,0.0016565776,0.00067450054,0.0011346772,0.00094860705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439776,0.00055257446,0.0029424024,0.0004944197,0.00069462485,0.0009182181],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020405406,0.0005453388,0.0009619006,0.00030914214,0.00040289486,0.00009486178,0.00076052407,0.00026103135,0.00009381491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005876509,0.00048753407,0.00037083126,0.0008601241,0.00014457133,0.0014447109,0.0001929669,0.0017284956,0.00014368641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0062537994,0.0016553748,0.00040320045,0.00018409867,0.0011744706,0.00025093392,0.043706,0.0018789127,0.00228697,0.0024333724,0.9182858,0.021487076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05973587,0.012653139,0.0033150523,0.0025611764,0.0024858604,0.03322122,0.32478377,0.3222157,0.0012305903,0.002787298,0.22964354,0.00536678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007282506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019374478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68864226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003140216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007966961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180000962","doi":"10.1108/jfp-02-2021-0004","title":"“That’s the way my Wednesdays always go”: reverse-order instructions insufficient to mitigate schema-consistent errors in alibi generation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Alibi; Schema (genetic algorithms); Recall; Psychology; Mnemonic; Originality; Social psychology; Computer science; Cognitive psychology; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.0572796402303015,"score_gpt":0.33967404220425906,"score_spread":0.28239440197395754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180000962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82947934,0.00080582395,0.006652632,0.0746945,0.03382374,0.0004755023,0.00001680805,0.000051239174,0.05400043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95569956,0.0001986185,0.013944548,0.020347424,0.0011685594,0.00003952649,0.0000121268395,0.000056725316,0.008532931],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969747,0.0007498917,0.000971298,0.00039094815,0.00051954645,0.00039358594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701566,0.00033502033,0.00088216865,0.00060988055,0.00093334663,0.00022392573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001547141,0.00022871736,0.00037547568,0.0004088349,0.00022115503,0.00009074537,0.00023875713,0.0002082151,0.0012745713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017598891,0.00018251555,0.00023266191,0.0011655821,0.00020603278,0.00048496795,0.0000701255,0.0009359239,0.00042428565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013217533,0.0020404607,0.0010016857,0.000020245727,0.00097509037,0.0017357984,0.019788796,0.0023356979,0.015766812,0.02425351,0.79996014,0.13080001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027418737,0.00047549314,0.011429504,0.00006213507,0.00024086563,0.015478651,0.02656911,0.0001916049,0.0024730016,0.0004122665,0.9395957,0.00032980344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006811255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051241345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13963555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021042611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018126845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210819885","doi":"10.1108/jfp-06-2021-0035","title":"The bias in judgement: when “naïve” knowledge challenges expert knowledge in criminal trials","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean; Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Normative; Quality (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Cognition; Judicial opinion; Originality; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Criminal justice; Social psychology; Management science; Epistemology; Political science; Computer science; Criminology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.2656472454443383,"score_gpt":0.45714908826108525,"score_spread":0.19150184281674693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210819885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13666011,0.15600179,0.00045406513,0.06651442,0.052851498,0.0012503152,0.000014303828,0.00007932176,0.5861742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98090965,0.006201855,0.00088034914,0.0027500645,0.0018937982,0.00020999099,0.0000026721164,0.000074156094,0.0070774555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910474,0.0058176736,0.0018532587,0.00034212042,0.00043986732,0.00049968925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919512,0.0054879147,0.0016431673,0.00047775716,0.00031259324,0.00012734132],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016948821,0.00023430136,0.0006973923,0.00079554546,0.00025174848,0.000053127715,0.0005698024,0.0001331708,0.0021994945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003827616,0.00017723527,0.0003018496,0.00051157724,0.00018600796,0.00037041242,0.0001613386,0.0014615967,0.00022972994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004840299,0.0020082318,0.00007879525,0.000011292545,0.0002868982,0.00041982683,0.052747052,0.00001600303,0.00009101717,0.01767761,0.24092193,0.68090105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044116043,0.0010284808,0.0036870523,0.000032194494,0.00007678352,0.0022946012,0.078002736,0.000024929086,0.000028993758,0.0027185443,0.9075117,0.0001823657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005631316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050440355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84424955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036450374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018181748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281791128","doi":"10.1108/jfp-06-2021-0034","title":"Developing immersive videos to train social cognition in individuals with schizophrenia in forensic psychiatry","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Schizophrenia research and treatment","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Originality; Mental health; Anger; Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming); Cognitive psychology; Generalization; Applied psychology; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Psychotherapist; Psychiatry; Creativity","score_opus":0.027882565772292547,"score_gpt":0.3311208225223967,"score_spread":0.3032382567501042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281791128","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9317079,0.0003674146,0.00030320373,0.06626411,0.00024842581,0.0006488939,0.000018947598,0.0000068363183,0.00043426504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.917182,0.00003143417,0.07999487,0.0024216447,0.00025911565,0.000051585484,0.000018143684,0.000026498992,0.000014653826],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973476,0.00033532106,0.00060672313,0.0002242755,0.0010776487,0.00040842916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984792,0.00040576907,0.00050472276,0.000118338896,0.00029500166,0.00019697585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014013461,0.00018393656,0.00046496303,0.0009249374,0.00017207366,0.000034665805,0.00013400427,0.00005609267,0.000066903274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007907546,0.00015310707,0.00010964472,0.0010538207,0.000055972298,0.00045727842,0.00008115141,0.0010696958,0.000009559877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.411188,0.006727917,0.12916638,0.00036365553,0.0044140653,0.019995308,0.021242889,0.0005925927,0.0020374008,0.027991686,0.021015525,0.35526457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.090094164,0.0136723565,0.78852427,0.0014288756,0.0013069223,0.019437084,0.05541289,0.00006431597,0.0025311904,0.020586105,0.006070377,0.000871442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068168796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005955467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6593579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007768412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022580049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6243525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395456853","doi":"10.1108/jfp-01-2024-0002","title":"Self-harm and aggression in women who committed a criminal offence: a scoping review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Forensic Practice","topic":"Suicide and Self-Harm Studies","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Aggression; Harm; PsycINFO; Psychology; Population; Clinical psychology; Psychiatry; Social psychology; Medicine; MEDLINE; Political science","score_opus":0.08611062260403568,"score_gpt":0.44917605948164896,"score_spread":0.3630654368776133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395456853","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004745522,0.99488753,0.00000408083,0.0010653262,0.0013678443,0.0008683964,0.0000060467946,0.000025647088,0.0017276837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000023069815,0.99684453,0.0007933753,0.0016508499,0.00045227289,0.00008312349,0.0000020672526,0.000056757966,0.000114695686],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99551153,0.0011877444,0.001912436,0.0004030753,0.000501631,0.00048357042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940859,0.0023345582,0.0027418057,0.00035385313,0.0003031969,0.00018065669],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034226554,0.0005069346,0.0030648266,0.0005447564,0.000089012705,0.00009066607,0.00034154436,0.0002732491,0.00013434706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019246985,0.00034333547,0.00040459237,0.000701936,0.00008954439,0.00043684014,0.00021142041,0.0020833674,0.00010350163],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012421087,0.00014265832,0.000002957718,0.1519622,0.00109661,0.0028730961,0.003873417,1.0855204e-8,4.3158884e-8,0.000044464992,0.027296638,0.8125837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034196526,0.00024650063,0.0000044438802,0.4763659,0.004965684,0.006058153,0.0011006056,4.005987e-7,5.7349723e-8,0.00004670184,0.5106419,0.00022770236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017853297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000053066015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.812356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030670405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005415351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}