{"meta":{"query_hash":"7fdeff9e80bc","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Forest Economics"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7fdeff9e80bc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Forest+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W175155875","doi":"10.1108/j.jfe.2001.12.004","title":"Wood Trade Flows: an Empirical Analysis of Greek Wood Imports","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Aging","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; International economics; Environmental science; International trade","score_opus":0.06171463112932691,"score_gpt":0.25111999776405725,"score_spread":0.18940536663473034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W175155875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99262625,0.0007148619,0.00070213806,0.00070790574,0.0006301498,0.00009345984,0.00015476791,0.0000113885035,0.0043591047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99559957,0.0017460078,0.0018184842,0.00039391572,0.00032935847,0.0000020681694,0.000027209091,0.00003556013,0.000047822017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660176,0.000019828483,0.0025204462,0.00037935638,0.000040841693,0.00043779414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677366,0.00006923942,0.0022370159,0.00052375754,0.000038592843,0.00035771952],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095199316,0.00026856284,0.0014366322,0.0010811434,0.00006752136,0.00009652753,0.0005941937,0.00022824961,0.00034254818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049166603,0.00030649014,0.0009044586,0.00052749325,0.00007979668,0.00095348305,0.000047351194,0.00029124692,0.0000421106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015005746,0.0005118348,0.9242076,0.000016145696,0.0016604891,0.00005800006,0.00053879834,0.052550837,0.000005729089,0.01865123,0.00059736904,0.0010518765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022356617,0.0009762441,0.8275612,0.00002039568,0.00073211,0.0004627056,0.00044657575,0.05796435,0.00003739601,0.051233724,0.05754116,0.0007884538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014600759,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008979524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09664641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002529621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008326571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970415148","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2010.07.001","title":"Carbon sequestration and the optimal forest harvest decision: A dynamic programming approach considering biomass and dead organic matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Taiga; Biomass (ecology); Carbon fibers; Carbon cycle; Carbon sink; Organic matter; Boreal; Agroforestry; Forestry; Carbon dioxide; Ecology; Ecosystem; Mathematics; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.006886777862216755,"score_gpt":0.20838103921187712,"score_spread":0.20149426134966036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970415148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99714535,0.000030808347,0.0005264296,0.00043592873,0.00013058189,0.00019365862,7.25482e-7,0.0000057697266,0.001530766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895231,0.000047219306,0.010115893,0.000096780976,0.000085499014,0.0000043923706,0.0000014082398,0.000015923873,0.000109748915],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992219,0.000019764007,0.00035044143,0.00014928108,0.00007438864,0.00018418637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937785,0.00008316471,0.0002852808,0.00015068265,0.000008182866,0.00009481861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052912487,0.00012930308,0.00017888135,0.00006204345,0.00011260888,0.00024830876,0.00016960477,0.00006563136,0.00007039265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027956974,0.00009144053,0.000045667344,0.00005784166,0.00041585742,0.0004133808,0.0001472897,0.0002151068,0.00001689534],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017869676,0.00005153423,0.98100233,0.00003478335,0.000056092264,0.0000131892375,0.0007000057,0.0050447127,0.0004294007,0.0037465475,0.00019999972,0.008542693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030458195,0.00023147553,0.80954874,0.000030024936,0.00013364661,0.0011707941,0.00017411115,0.17161138,0.000047893427,0.007021544,0.0065911706,0.00039339604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023472225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002618568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17145361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048663307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016748585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37288368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981242896","doi":"10.1078/1104-6899-00016","title":"Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve for clearcutting in Canadian forests?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Clearcutting; Kuznets curve; Economics; Environmental science; Forestry; Geography; Econometrics","score_opus":0.02882734829577511,"score_gpt":0.2022421210887582,"score_spread":0.1734147727929831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981242896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928066,0.0012178789,0.00015211002,0.0007594808,0.000406493,0.00021626338,0.00023649802,0.000005178373,0.004199466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962346,0.0011452322,0.0013058276,0.00053060986,0.0003106211,0.000012731157,0.00001383966,0.00007690656,0.0003696075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975077,0.00001824363,0.0013923742,0.0004017801,0.000024911922,0.0006549832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979789,0.00007297221,0.0011217771,0.00037944762,0.0000069711405,0.00043992078],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009699476,0.0002437165,0.0005841984,0.0005583454,0.00010874592,0.000105738756,0.00050773524,0.00019673524,0.00096650573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045044693,0.00031020358,0.000258775,0.000055877237,0.00008097105,0.00091387425,0.00004007381,0.00027513164,0.00024586765],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018876133,0.00011868487,0.9644163,0.000011847377,0.00005396493,0.0000097391785,0.00051180646,0.008554376,0.000002643291,0.024689024,0.00053943245,0.0010733007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022713311,0.0004450116,0.789896,0.000024686658,0.000013997757,0.00007499488,0.00023180728,0.060176324,0.00005495799,0.044434074,0.10178687,0.0005899314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009731538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09949477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17452028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013073441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003864632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991106256","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2011.12.002","title":"Optimal forest harvest age considering carbon sequestration in multiple carbon pools: A comparative statics analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Comparative statics; Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Carbon fibers; Organic matter; Pulp and paper industry; Ecology; Mathematics; Economics; Biology; Carbon dioxide; Engineering","score_opus":0.04217126765352515,"score_gpt":0.2660569132719365,"score_spread":0.22388564561841134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991106256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98998916,0.00004497431,0.0001101844,0.00008594105,0.00015631421,0.00015238923,0.00000453936,0.000007127435,0.009449348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99473864,0.000061017487,0.004792072,0.000078367666,0.00014777276,0.0000041428784,0.000010673394,0.000013737642,0.00015358503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986109,0.00006703419,0.00069090887,0.00013606754,0.0001303519,0.0003647448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989588,0.00014013403,0.0005417896,0.00017335909,0.000014802095,0.00017110401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005832749,0.00017760402,0.00040238292,0.0002789729,0.00004484859,0.000079369434,0.00019698584,0.000067374334,0.000060259074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054208416,0.00017467602,0.00013249223,0.0002796313,0.00014448164,0.0007754509,0.00008823572,0.00020406295,0.000021403544],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035242716,0.00006311562,0.58330834,0.0000039009615,0.00008403321,0.000012543273,0.0013531228,0.41457978,0.000019552992,0.0004352115,0.000060705544,0.00004443545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008571705,0.0001618549,0.7588004,0.00001576965,0.0002880923,0.00001950006,0.0004922395,0.23622406,0.00009284067,0.00035056283,0.0024235363,0.0002740094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032145518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019521356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17835572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044216812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026494075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995084187","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2007.10.001","title":"Revitalized? An event study of forest policy reform in British Columbia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Forestry; Economics; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.010095431880801574,"score_gpt":0.25244154509599365,"score_spread":0.24234611321519206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995084187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991483,0.000020325391,0.0000102662325,0.00006109966,0.000137046,0.00026815129,0.0000036004885,0.000004429033,0.008012134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99834543,0.00012796292,0.00020708871,0.00010929185,0.00020639335,0.000001968767,0.0000022066247,0.00001903237,0.000980602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834454,0.000029455761,0.0009920776,0.00015895932,0.00015496787,0.00031998343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988759,0.00002422945,0.0006611754,0.0002556269,0.000015016584,0.00016801173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012550678,0.000100119585,0.00032912107,0.00015475597,0.000055485514,0.000098661345,0.00045144412,0.00006162205,0.00037482486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036106587,0.0001348429,0.00010584432,0.00023351524,0.000098099226,0.0006693193,0.00015020618,0.00015778311,0.000031995052],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045069195,0.0005807719,0.98352873,0.000011412407,0.000017946906,0.000045172907,0.0004381484,0.007830421,0.000003275967,0.0002946231,0.000860696,0.0063437345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013721825,0.00096787617,0.9891687,0.000031095173,0.000017782244,0.000059233917,0.00049769453,0.00031279976,0.000002305952,0.0023326636,0.00509976,0.000137898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1707827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8584945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68771183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083160045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003567507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83473915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016301066","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2006.11.001","title":"The J-curve effect and the US–Canada forest products trade","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Agricultural economics; International trade; International economics; Environmental science; Forestry; Geography","score_opus":0.015490064281715335,"score_gpt":0.18142730349409253,"score_spread":0.16593723921237719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016301066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98085785,0.004906273,0.00009133199,0.0068688164,0.0017706641,0.00026936506,0.000025993704,0.0000049808446,0.0052047027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995873,0.0025587888,0.00012266127,0.0006576517,0.00063438766,0.000003259205,0.0000019633928,0.00002603671,0.00012228095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791807,0.000026421512,0.0013345543,0.00023243515,0.00003460756,0.00045392712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974595,0.0007217575,0.001274265,0.00035809432,0.000029155402,0.00015724174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004012188,0.00021260024,0.0005851749,0.000086626904,0.0003076145,0.00021743543,0.0005445505,0.000089017056,0.0000068840523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031601195,0.00014350539,0.00018565192,0.00010038805,0.00026930703,0.0003165302,0.00006120682,0.00035888547,0.000016183396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006449136,0.00004201097,0.5044381,0.000045306308,0.000261286,0.000017556798,0.00018085429,0.0030208158,6.4641137e-7,0.4836657,0.005709303,0.0019734667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003650737,0.00031813953,0.41915202,0.000016884425,0.000041375115,0.00035438288,0.00013121343,0.0015135382,0.000065999986,0.060082115,0.5143275,0.00034606492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011865257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17644535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50861824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029613686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014078851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029913253","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2009.01.001","title":"Use of composite forest commodity price indices for cointegration analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Econometrics; Commodity; Economics; Product (mathematics); Spot contract; Forest product; Time series; Financial economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Finance; Geography; Forestry","score_opus":0.038266986067535494,"score_gpt":0.2397128765651756,"score_spread":0.2014458904976401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029913253","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93965757,0.00015534445,0.05852332,0.0003052213,0.00020241723,0.00017179106,0.00036469707,0.0000044127037,0.00061521673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918921,0.00024225596,0.0075259125,0.00012354778,0.0000907038,0.0000017032065,0.00005702976,0.00001013587,0.000056597815],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980694,0.000017184862,0.0015060216,0.00018937938,0.000029480132,0.00018850977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966093,0.00024422986,0.0025949685,0.0002825856,0.00016708446,0.000101858306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011071033,0.00014822165,0.0008084528,0.0005613664,0.000073419294,0.00011215631,0.00027497965,0.00011361699,0.00003130216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013650904,0.00015605688,0.0005512279,0.00023655596,0.00004973776,0.00065737293,0.000020709238,0.00015897116,0.0000014938354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021314368,0.00017931675,0.9143673,0.000025265866,0.00034390468,6.1697824e-7,0.00010694852,0.010814068,0.0000051158986,0.07313518,0.0002320543,0.00057703466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045823102,0.0002550695,0.63022995,0.000009393386,0.00010446478,0.000004162948,0.000012056108,0.30243298,0.000014199245,0.062350884,0.003997547,0.00013109748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018691433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001039849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2916189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014586578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041595533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6363815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042058727","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2010.07.002","title":"U.S. softwood lumber demand and supply estimation using cointegration in dynamic equations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Softwood; Economics; Estimation; Econometrics; Supply and demand; Macroeconomics; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering","score_opus":0.007400660040508301,"score_gpt":0.2362377680017909,"score_spread":0.2288371079612826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042058727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99535817,0.0000063662906,0.0033306875,0.00022853057,0.00015102705,0.00007084725,0.0000014175246,0.0000024812819,0.0008504734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99097496,0.000027067399,0.008803074,0.00004630954,0.000033738437,7.466762e-7,0.0000030837723,0.0000064174856,0.000104587336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950385,0.0000102860195,0.00027516502,0.00006970437,0.000043654185,0.00009733729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963075,0.000037524125,0.00021044651,0.00006896488,0.0000056074637,0.000046688514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029017485,0.00006245889,0.00009311536,0.00008951894,0.00004686261,0.00005221402,0.00007668148,0.0000412337,0.00024410847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000429546,0.0000592484,0.000027550772,0.00005576208,0.000067777175,0.0005958237,0.00003281343,0.00013426412,0.00003628488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021935424,0.000058514855,0.72211903,0.000008985854,0.000009949753,0.0000036092194,0.0004650034,0.2606442,0.0008177034,0.0069599207,0.00030871888,0.00858244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034399008,0.000032919255,0.2695005,0.000008602943,0.000014771832,0.000032974232,0.0000125273,0.72026545,0.000018507877,0.009292034,0.00040644317,0.00007129389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035282745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010892669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45962125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009251167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015496527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6078365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056117360","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2009.05.002","title":"Assessing costs and benefits of pest management on forested landbases in eastern and western Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Spruce budworm; Net present value; Choristoneura fumiferana; Cost–benefit analysis; License; Forest protection; Integrated pest management; Liberian dollar; Agricultural science; Pest control; Forestry; Forest management; PEST analysis; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Business; Tortricidae; Agricultural economics; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Production (economics); Finance","score_opus":0.01477214278560954,"score_gpt":0.2289931480566961,"score_spread":0.21422100527108656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056117360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99382985,0.00005933251,0.0000033575461,0.00038400714,0.00005769955,0.00008052016,0.0000023616467,0.0000013935904,0.0055814725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903727,0.00029552975,0.00016367558,0.00029789697,0.00003107823,4.2116565e-7,0.0000011203244,0.000005531942,0.00016750427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993433,0.000013673934,0.00031428033,0.00010218487,0.00008453991,0.00014205603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954355,0.000034541084,0.00025458433,0.000085573905,0.0000042649544,0.00007746344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016966533,0.00009607996,0.00017631194,0.000093218434,0.00002655929,0.00005266649,0.00011084361,0.000023664352,0.000017744142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000058156606,0.000086306136,0.00001928261,0.000050164857,0.000040015384,0.00032673852,0.000054598637,0.00007018191,0.0000025360255],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042012354,0.000040507915,0.9617818,0.000016969043,0.000009147101,0.0000185776,0.0000518583,0.013691847,0.0000014307622,0.00095195096,0.0003161929,0.02307768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066090294,0.0001765069,0.99604785,0.00010344257,0.000014356824,0.00001654168,0.000040752708,0.0010154921,0.00001294594,0.00029195787,0.0015330929,0.00008617031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024444118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37536794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35092384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015577486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014169414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060674783","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2005.05.001","title":"A mill-specific roundwood demand equation for southern and central Finland","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Economics; Forestry; Environmental science; Econometrics; Agricultural economics; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.015339432085764536,"score_gpt":0.20787680628117142,"score_spread":0.19253737419540687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060674783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99503183,0.000121648416,0.0020339997,0.00068564137,0.000109135166,0.000115181385,0.0000061404517,0.0000024804335,0.0018939304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99329126,0.0003377382,0.004091894,0.0001630757,0.0005000315,0.000001995706,0.0000024760686,0.0000113577435,0.0016001804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942017,0.000008824696,0.0002639915,0.000087301065,0.000045337394,0.00017437918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958533,0.00004056458,0.00021451547,0.00007102405,0.00000522044,0.000083367464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020107008,0.00007744448,0.000115426636,0.00004054733,0.000063453066,0.00006355543,0.000107225875,0.00003540644,0.00031835714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009000234,0.00006779545,0.00006317308,0.000023486407,0.00005134613,0.00031898767,0.000032404205,0.000051494015,0.00014494186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005008,0.00019516704,0.6058637,0.000038692102,0.00010549707,0.0000040618206,0.004326111,0.23878716,0.000119062825,0.012103584,0.05810765,0.079848506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002729124,0.00035177756,0.14700502,0.000016949154,0.000057979858,0.000045787732,0.00010451288,0.047562897,0.000056711204,0.011123375,0.790657,0.00028887586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029936149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026918922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73254937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011041378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007287097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34857872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065872677","doi":"10.1078/1104-6899-00020","title":"Economic indicators of sustainable forest management: theory versus practice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Natural capital; Variety (cybernetics); Divergence (linguistics); Sustainable forest management; Forest management; Economics; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Natural resource; Business; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Ecosystem services","score_opus":0.004758340320926345,"score_gpt":0.21078090974757313,"score_spread":0.2060225694266468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065872677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8620677,0.000056963883,0.0001002929,0.00008584382,0.00026779895,0.00015431781,0.0000012391258,0.000004191655,0.13726167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951671,0.00047777515,0.0023976392,0.00011506533,0.000047105434,0.0000047700546,0.0000015641908,0.00002566273,0.0017633538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986313,0.00007175768,0.00061438244,0.00017426039,0.00011454706,0.00039373495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860567,0.0001779254,0.00082318264,0.00023189034,0.0000069248313,0.00015440573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011862398,0.00016940311,0.00025390394,0.00021567925,0.00009886746,0.00003588986,0.0003627549,0.00007465377,0.0007966863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010038446,0.00016777345,0.00012820307,0.00012472169,0.0002217198,0.0010047897,0.00016289715,0.00014830564,0.00014020603],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012041263,0.00032369752,0.27494153,0.00006917534,0.00038660664,0.00017338496,0.0011519452,0.12878476,0.0000058316905,0.58512896,0.003209878,0.004620096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068167425,0.00083854375,0.2287439,0.000025803689,0.0003640615,0.00020415978,0.037673697,0.00010618836,0.0007959912,0.09537358,0.62823856,0.0008187639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008010129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034436565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62502867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011699863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006654034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8723156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068189185","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2014.03.001","title":"The effect of collective forestland tenure reform in China: Does land parcelization reduce forest management intensity?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Beijing Forestry University; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet; University of Missouri","keywords":"China; Forest management; Land tenure; Intensity (physics); Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Geography","score_opus":0.0031773874668343948,"score_gpt":0.19854419895858888,"score_spread":0.19536681149175447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068189185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97527504,0.000015574073,0.000055548102,0.0004684,0.0002763814,0.00027967084,0.000001569128,0.000004017597,0.023623805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980776,0.0002588912,0.00013387536,0.000034199125,0.00011188121,0.000006981356,0.0000030443111,0.000014142018,0.0013594207],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989606,0.000059981317,0.0004942906,0.0001348953,0.00012105831,0.00022916283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999096,0.00009832329,0.00051320205,0.00021679416,0.000012297718,0.00006339389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010216973,0.0001435253,0.0002802971,0.00012434789,0.00011364089,0.00004894157,0.0003035902,0.000055059103,0.000028557257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005620087,0.00007971297,0.00010165357,0.00016638565,0.00016126852,0.00023581804,0.00015360203,0.00014632527,0.000021092867],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004954324,0.000024455461,0.95568657,0.00003367683,0.00004232882,0.000004712689,0.00022655938,0.0366233,0.0000034602833,0.0027942352,0.0014102667,0.002654997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015052786,0.00072447455,0.9646674,0.000057261816,0.000050902036,0.000017775717,0.000045456152,0.011146736,0.00012076078,0.0121587245,0.009375297,0.000129924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005897929,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008526639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025476562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004460668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011127398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47580647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103582910","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2005.07.002","title":"Economic efficiency and shadow prices of social and biological outputs of village-level organizations of joint forest management in Gujarat, India","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow price; Joint Forest Management; Shadow (psychology); Joint (building); Natural resource economics; Economics; Forest management; Business; Agricultural economics; Geography; Forestry; Mathematics; Engineering; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.018599596968482537,"score_gpt":0.20299756972099203,"score_spread":0.1843979727525095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103582910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982239,0.00004773294,0.00017027164,0.0002599604,0.00003521679,0.00012838043,0.000015016511,0.0000013336909,0.001118175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982406,0.00041608198,0.0012521234,0.000034515877,0.00002233784,4.3570537e-7,0.0000018324089,0.0000034494353,0.000028632363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991903,0.000015954622,0.0005243307,0.00011408511,0.000055586028,0.0000997548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999271,0.000026099866,0.00058144156,0.000067273984,0.00001466313,0.00003954446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003102169,0.0000805273,0.00023349645,0.00014568334,0.000050076822,0.000011684175,0.000151586,0.000049371796,0.00007833196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000111790805,0.00007091897,0.000042219857,0.00008420281,0.00023658505,0.0001247541,0.0002301879,0.000048788796,0.0000026910277],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022254064,0.000097419565,0.98397166,0.000026825624,0.000028156554,9.4889634e-7,0.00094604754,0.012384267,0.000065043336,0.0011490941,0.000048167825,0.0012601428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005867042,0.00010371346,0.9965722,0.000010202693,0.000021670718,0.000003915411,0.0005847646,0.0010251565,0.00010071524,0.00035053326,0.00057311886,0.00006729015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000108676286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009098404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012600581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010900766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013969259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28919914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137274029","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2009.11.002","title":"Contrasting two approaches in real options valuation: Contingent claims versus dynamic programming","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Futures contract; Valuation (finance); Convenience yield; Economics; Dynamic programming; Discounting; Constant (computer programming); Econometrics; Yield (engineering); Investment (military); Actuarial science; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Spot contract; Financial economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Finance","score_opus":0.09980356780401368,"score_gpt":0.2776634206280657,"score_spread":0.17785985282405203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137274029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99092615,0.0047990503,0.0005427894,0.0006756923,0.00047294967,0.00015558064,0.00000826017,0.000010412634,0.002409139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99042773,0.0045442325,0.0046588383,0.000041172145,0.00022169451,0.0000043827267,0.000016294278,0.000013599581,0.00007203705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981935,0.000017110215,0.0012721595,0.00021229371,0.00003319634,0.00027172573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845606,0.000074639705,0.0011694564,0.00015529127,0.00004234879,0.0001021838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010518985,0.00015059231,0.00051478285,0.00045804944,0.00008641032,0.00014095625,0.00019955939,0.00007843009,0.00002314296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005503916,0.00016448472,0.00028032533,0.00018066485,0.000048010683,0.0005504818,0.000018820017,0.00022582547,0.000026115054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012869277,0.0002229935,0.05396435,0.000007320933,0.00013944661,0.0000090469775,0.00056798785,0.03578012,0.000004232902,0.9009256,0.00001972206,0.008230511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0082473485,0.0009050765,0.27817166,0.00006574576,0.00015054234,0.00004318323,0.0011722894,0.3590154,0.000017724995,0.34907812,0.0024637862,0.00066914136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011233231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008110924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55184746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039844122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004375113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67074925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195146120","doi":"10.1108/j.jfe.2001.03.003","title":"Fuelwood Collection in North-eastern Zimbabwe: Valuation and Caloric Expenditures","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture Food and Rural Development; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Caloric theory; Valuation (finance); Economics; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.014270639221294434,"score_gpt":0.20599346521790227,"score_spread":0.19172282599660784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195146120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979216,0.000055167722,0.00015075789,0.00016209537,0.00014453758,0.00005104539,2.6851012e-7,0.0000020169182,0.0015125102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986073,0.0007934091,0.00024112898,0.000091438604,0.00006930348,0.0000018211441,0.0000014147273,0.000006478628,0.0001877368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994377,0.000022089724,0.00025965238,0.00008602774,0.00006936092,0.00012518912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963784,0.000025296133,0.00018642127,0.00006361934,0.0000020000743,0.00008483244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001757186,0.000073844014,0.00010972607,0.00006544392,0.00004347488,0.000026637812,0.000072889605,0.00004593887,0.00020653706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011472802,0.00006775352,0.00002964359,0.00005482338,0.00003887974,0.0005013914,0.000030642794,0.00009731603,0.0000375037],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034908393,0.000038873826,0.8437921,0.00000118042,0.000004298717,0.000006243174,0.00018563913,0.15286605,0.00003406389,0.000016165219,0.00016648075,0.0028540066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051991345,0.00011706572,0.99334985,0.0000043325763,0.0000073302467,0.00009961567,0.00006625189,0.0025556327,0.000029789291,0.001973228,0.001204758,0.00007221993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003421545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008257784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15031041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002327459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008065148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46080375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529484772","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2017.09.002","title":"Forest land value and rotation with an alternative land use","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Rotation (mathematics); Land value; Function (biology); Constant (computer programming); Tree (set theory); Land use; Mathematics; Agroforestry; Economics; Computer science; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Statistics; Combinatorics; Geometry; Biology","score_opus":0.022773198667396664,"score_gpt":0.25105765634906374,"score_spread":0.22828445768166708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529484772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957187,0.00002754166,0.00014043457,0.00023462794,0.00029996355,0.00019619023,0.000021736603,0.0000054355855,0.0033553764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99460566,0.00095519365,0.0029679607,0.00012001262,0.00049781014,0.000004549561,0.000028187584,0.00003054529,0.0007901047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909115,0.000033140626,0.00034116654,0.00023140387,0.00012167819,0.00018148705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983181,0.000044360084,0.001113849,0.00034172993,0.000020971045,0.00016098664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034373155,0.00020899775,0.00030027554,0.000101266385,0.00011839044,0.00045689632,0.00042807823,0.00010767031,0.00007905878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000313383,0.00016604077,0.000068447145,0.000014935828,0.00019178401,0.0010562638,0.00036469442,0.00031635322,0.00003138752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013374805,0.000029231906,0.8178893,0.00003997936,0.000057909227,0.000020064163,0.00025782597,0.17956898,3.178819e-7,0.00076837256,0.0003910888,0.00084322644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095209165,0.0005115983,0.92927897,0.00021522184,0.00011201206,0.000071927156,0.0000122571155,0.038719293,0.000006201682,0.021661108,0.008123616,0.00033568588],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00406998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009799932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14084968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015779724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040412648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67709464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900666964","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2018.10.004","title":"Economic impacts of conservation area strategies in Alberta, Canada: A CGE model analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Natural resource economics; Economic impact analysis; Rationalization (economics); Economics; Natural resource; Land use; Environmental resource management; Ecology","score_opus":0.04722418757773488,"score_gpt":0.21181620351946442,"score_spread":0.16459201594172954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900666964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9937542,0.00010981303,0.0016469285,0.00041295544,0.00023811669,0.00008471283,0.00008110446,0.0000015031692,0.0036706473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986901,0.00025985573,0.0006814102,0.00016234608,0.00008584719,0.0000023297146,0.000015858117,0.000015953963,0.00008627383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794155,0.000011204673,0.0016015065,0.00020678421,0.000022100883,0.00021686494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997748,0.00007819018,0.0018198545,0.00023068424,0.000027718339,0.00009553758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062879425,0.00015284096,0.0006887823,0.00048418375,0.000036131936,0.00004220969,0.00023603912,0.00009350169,0.00022508376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003358628,0.00018204146,0.00019536757,0.00011234152,0.00009837987,0.0007528498,0.00003220202,0.00011246076,0.000028278393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034801422,0.00002861693,0.7241624,0.000007215943,0.00017551583,5.4390995e-7,0.0002336945,0.23531884,0.0000031686004,0.0397829,0.00022968755,0.000022632366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064584595,0.00010153965,0.6699209,0.000009828942,0.000052540934,0.0000051828833,0.00019646877,0.3020852,0.000065953645,0.02644533,0.00030581703,0.00016542182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4382286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9427796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.504551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011071704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052829727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7423435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964480981","doi":"10.1561/112.00000446","title":"Carbon Uptake and Forest Management under Uncertainty: Why Natural Disturbance Matters","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Forest management; Natural (archaeology); Environmental science; Carbon fibers; Natural resource economics; Natural forest; Environmental resource management; Economics; Forestry; Agroforestry; Geography; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.005479337576814682,"score_gpt":0.19285458683060647,"score_spread":0.1873752492537918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964480981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98480994,0.00008132064,0.000011055451,0.0019345544,0.0006026654,0.00017574642,0.0000015569093,0.0000072495804,0.01237593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99317086,0.00022665576,0.00030936545,0.0024591312,0.0001024074,0.0000020394125,0.000002644939,0.000018703018,0.0037081854],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990584,0.000013683753,0.00036232892,0.00018530546,0.00011538732,0.00026486733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935013,0.000026852998,0.0003057672,0.0002103927,0.0000058154765,0.00010104795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021345555,0.0001608457,0.00021520327,0.00008383371,0.00004444136,0.00007877768,0.0002939334,0.000040759413,0.00026906625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000025221432,0.00013844113,0.00008825428,0.00007128381,0.00011063367,0.00033681354,0.00018566093,0.00015148032,0.00016741335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012957622,0.000045974048,0.7621753,0.00005586004,0.000113383816,0.000018627938,0.0001792988,0.20099743,0.000014580217,0.015233503,0.018389944,0.002646505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011952688,0.00014886804,0.8282002,0.000039954586,0.00006320531,0.000043738728,0.00010957861,0.02273493,0.000003322733,0.0067797983,0.14038497,0.00029615202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036521236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007618266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1782625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023018243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005966152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5645465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123112265","doi":"10.1108/j.jfe.2001.12.003","title":"Welfare Implications of the Allowable Cut Effect in the Context of Sustained Yield and Sustainable Development Forestry","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture Food and Rural Development","funders":"","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Welfare; Context (archaeology); Sustainable development; Economics; Forestry; Natural resource economics; Political science; Physics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.008133451360486647,"score_gpt":0.19992637918357123,"score_spread":0.19179292782308457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123112265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915532,0.00002835159,0.000060910887,0.0049953023,0.00002212452,0.00025625495,7.8107877e-7,8.9243207e-7,0.003082221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882734,0.000092243965,0.000113590635,0.0005443102,0.0000056059594,0.0000075864095,6.468874e-7,0.0000045532024,0.00040412004],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993029,0.000030281588,0.0003792036,0.000073048046,0.00007576378,0.00013880894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937993,0.00008334218,0.00033484056,0.00016434074,0.000008215559,0.000029329405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063736195,0.000070422735,0.00013353837,0.000036059,0.000089479756,0.000013552744,0.0002856817,0.000028776467,0.000079224796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003777559,0.000044365144,0.0000499341,0.00008927014,0.00012040949,0.0001656013,0.00016009201,0.00008275899,0.000001306512],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046232493,0.000071300885,0.9864012,0.000029192044,0.000016048172,0.0000031527175,0.0005960713,0.0028123104,0.0000869274,0.00753238,0.00087965035,0.0015255486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004483932,0.00009555763,0.9619312,0.000013936294,0.00001501332,0.000015804007,0.004712613,0.000066361354,0.00059201854,0.0012682419,0.030787209,0.000053614815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033671397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002003718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029907558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016904698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020162684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1809158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162582394","doi":"10.1561/112.00000536","title":"A Theoretical Modeling Framework to Support Investment Decisions in Green and Grey Infrastructure under Risk and Uncertainty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Green infrastructure; Investment decisions; Economics; Business; Actuarial science; Environmental resource management; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Political science","score_opus":0.042060113264722615,"score_gpt":0.32159316033807406,"score_spread":0.27953304707335147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162582394","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9753571,0.00007270288,0.022290008,0.001201217,0.00028803016,0.00007626107,0.00000731764,0.000002368109,0.00070496177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986097,0.0007820604,0.01213126,0.00085703196,0.00009014992,0.0000011855207,6.4991895e-7,0.000006162922,0.00003454265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985323,0.00007306849,0.00078891875,0.00023536186,0.0002090615,0.00016132236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852645,0.0006114609,0.00026943174,0.00022451293,0.0001800191,0.00018814682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015725804,0.000110328656,0.00029211777,0.0003826334,0.000091478265,0.00027335086,0.00021953898,0.00008390277,0.00023674213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010307455,0.00008396112,0.000063916756,0.0002817134,0.00011112727,0.0003758935,0.00023436909,0.00031890112,0.0000061948845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116960924,0.000015895388,0.24343197,0.0000027625422,0.000024916773,0.000020219317,0.0008025124,0.27847475,0.0000015705309,0.39344832,0.00019815708,0.08346194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036465476,0.00008937426,0.044268876,0.00002933593,0.000015658947,0.0001642347,0.0010419744,0.11723814,0.0000030028718,0.8348272,0.0018653247,0.00009222013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002568792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006175115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44137886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006332539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017592864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3423835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194416414","doi":"10.1561/112.00000541","title":"Designing Voluntary Subsidies for Forest Owners under Imperfect Information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; European Commission; Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute","keywords":"Subsidy; Turnover; Imperfect; Perfect information; Natural resource economics; Economics; Business; Forestry; Environmental science; Microeconomics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.05857575700544583,"score_gpt":0.20857170280315107,"score_spread":0.14999594579770525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194416414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9413236,0.00070671516,0.054833546,0.0005674681,0.00083592354,0.0001397283,0.000058104826,0.0000071149916,0.0015278126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891615,0.0009581428,0.008747499,0.00056963786,0.00026290608,0.000010862205,0.00006967665,0.000023883156,0.00019592723],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984144,0.000010992258,0.0011638603,0.00015550776,0.000020943433,0.00023426954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843323,0.000116993135,0.0011293882,0.00017477977,0.00005217564,0.00009342231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076589617,0.0001495557,0.00041682756,0.00020087948,0.000112535105,0.00011364395,0.00016318189,0.0001074651,0.00013104381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000089212015,0.00017091288,0.00028001482,0.00005304106,0.000047549347,0.0016231451,0.00004026288,0.00013165669,0.00014044132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008039166,0.000062683735,0.76522905,0.000058062873,0.00021142716,0.0000020532445,0.0005599823,0.13716894,0.00003919926,0.09320765,0.0018804313,0.001500116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035367478,0.0004331508,0.7586742,0.000047340363,0.000078170815,0.0001642399,0.0019950874,0.016619567,0.0010217376,0.1806679,0.036128026,0.0006338261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004755492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001624569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12054938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004437978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008398591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6969625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205906111","doi":"10.1561/112.00000534","title":"A Gravity Model of Softwood Lumber Trade: An Application to the Canada-U.S. Trade Dispute","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Gravity model of trade; China; Economics; Softwood; Value (mathematics); International economics; International trade; Agricultural economics; Geography; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009555421804016079,"score_gpt":0.20999748237655214,"score_spread":0.20044206057253605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205906111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99160683,0.0000113937895,0.0015317725,0.0051526143,0.000090032416,0.00009539898,0.000019090066,0.0000021016212,0.0014907734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978288,0.000033985747,0.0010472784,0.0007604612,0.00009746615,0.0000027540348,0.0000042066517,0.000009178454,0.00021590725],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992996,0.000019160754,0.00032188595,0.000109228335,0.00010683983,0.00014328712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993853,0.000017384238,0.00023233822,0.00023651849,0.0000046296727,0.00012382476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020752949,0.00007915444,0.00014355584,0.000018772216,0.000055901844,0.000023331937,0.0003159065,0.000027500535,0.000060487768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008860641,0.000063547464,0.00006930976,0.00008604436,0.0000428079,0.00020617696,0.00006226356,0.00009698698,0.00000918587],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026886688,0.00010479521,0.05974657,0.000009571903,0.000028845907,0.0000032766538,0.00047093263,0.9002321,0.000254044,0.006586887,0.023534618,0.0090015065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067282136,0.00016257801,0.5216845,0.000012623126,0.00011072673,0.00006018385,0.000106836094,0.32503673,0.0007980089,0.009973378,0.14104739,0.00033419768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024186485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5788232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5751953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001808068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000110649766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98231155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207734094","doi":"10.1561/112.00000535","title":"On the Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Trade Flows: Evidence from the U.S.-Canada Trade in Forest Products","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Exchange rate; International economics; International trade; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.0480096750611566,"score_gpt":0.19899679172336096,"score_spread":0.15098711666220435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207734094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628613,0.0066145165,0.000013625103,0.02769076,0.0016664466,0.0002984374,0.00012361683,0.000003493826,0.0007278168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98927677,0.0073457942,0.000095473624,0.0026822388,0.00051444926,0.000013189521,0.0000062717354,0.000032851287,0.000032971304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792576,0.00009260443,0.0011369628,0.00038921382,0.00006262205,0.00039286815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99555635,0.0024245393,0.0012792986,0.00060432067,0.000028332486,0.000107140906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011918446,0.00026724816,0.0007634839,0.0002157843,0.00009032746,0.00010050476,0.000743202,0.00012133275,0.00003525681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013317447,0.00021072052,0.00020438537,0.00041576911,0.00006506429,0.00023081308,0.000060741568,0.0004938246,0.000019935589],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011763838,0.0014900074,0.4100931,0.00079093117,0.0013280385,0.0004658305,0.0038711494,0.12429491,0.0001820374,0.39962152,0.04321335,0.013472727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020406449,0.00079751713,0.907423,0.00067144807,0.000061437044,0.000044323653,0.0003515277,0.0036990528,0.0039419853,0.045706138,0.034686953,0.00057593605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011375589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22033988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49732992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000516502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002980144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9952077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391997941","doi":"10.1561/112.00000571","title":"Estimating the Effects of Covid-19 and Softwood Lumber Prices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Econometrics; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Environmental science; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering; Biology; Medicine","score_opus":0.007425337729623586,"score_gpt":0.24216784811519032,"score_spread":0.23474251038556673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391997941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954801,0.00030230693,0.00041100933,0.00077567814,0.0003631676,0.00007892541,8.7755046e-7,0.000005669664,0.002582228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970847,0.00012247787,0.0018998844,0.00028984773,0.00015836202,0.0000013266982,2.697707e-7,0.000008246946,0.00043489633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952966,0.0000134484535,0.00023119489,0.00007253916,0.000054849028,0.00009828249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939984,0.0002624749,0.00017793938,0.000082431936,0.0000022946324,0.00007501328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003567542,0.000064291424,0.000107083026,0.000040205585,0.00005278982,0.00006439973,0.00016440454,0.000022751039,0.00014782566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099668025,0.0000425517,0.00005602226,0.00005973789,0.00013158485,0.00026193823,0.00009751058,0.000088641325,0.00004274315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000653463,0.00010945311,0.62266755,0.0021243906,0.00031274604,0.00009493833,0.0074299504,0.20701163,0.00018681165,0.037138276,0.07409138,0.048767544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001918257,0.0011070434,0.26297674,0.00039832582,0.0005123613,0.0007293394,0.0001550057,0.2994968,0.0002744574,0.10912711,0.32265434,0.0006502238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016571682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012227424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35969082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000687013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023087601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17352079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400778471","doi":"10.1561/112.00000579","title":"The Impact of Forest Policy Modernization in British Columbia: A Stock Market Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Perspective (graphical); Stock market; Stock (firearms); Economics; Natural resource economics; Forestry; Agricultural economics; Geography; Economic growth; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006805596908157408,"score_gpt":0.24443948542296015,"score_spread":0.23763388851480274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400778471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98247904,0.0001695173,0.000048185473,0.0003546078,0.00011420056,0.00014566646,0.000013269456,0.000005129223,0.016670382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99581045,0.00072838616,0.00006471192,0.000022458544,0.00017775354,0.0000026604107,0.0000011185315,0.000016951812,0.0031755269],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915886,0.000030914438,0.0004014608,0.0001152018,0.00008638248,0.00020718947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948084,0.000084636136,0.00022476951,0.00012497584,0.000018119043,0.00006663987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041822312,0.00007606322,0.00016443305,0.00009415375,0.000067835215,0.00032339804,0.00027691099,0.000047260044,0.0004786428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007773994,0.00007949182,0.0001744333,0.00023434845,0.00014392275,0.00047668195,0.00009428481,0.00015655598,0.000030032545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003830868,0.00005387201,0.84721947,0.000012503853,0.00006778362,0.000017981512,0.0004584517,0.105379164,0.0000025459908,0.0019880142,0.039869938,0.0048919767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029027407,0.00018998659,0.88864243,0.00003849582,0.000014739504,0.00006468404,0.000091211106,0.07783444,4.4854326e-7,0.030339418,0.0024053655,0.0000885106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07675411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25586915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17911504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010248036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012087269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9293939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155159179","doi":"10.1108/j.jfe.2001.07.005","title":"Canadian Newsprint in the United States: a Multivariate Cointegration Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Newsprint; Cointegration; Multivariate statistics; Multivariate analysis; Ordinary least squares","score_opus":0.056711090112070955,"score_gpt":0.235446462952729,"score_spread":0.17873537284065805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155159179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99177897,0.000117768184,0.0020819104,0.0037373465,0.00020957709,0.00010558928,0.000065227905,0.000002928859,0.001900707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969025,0.0008915283,0.00030166758,0.0015754512,0.00014470854,0.0000026978068,0.000048427144,0.000012436893,0.000120577504],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982716,0.000034122677,0.0011722072,0.00016619856,0.000016495356,0.00033936335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860233,0.000095540396,0.00081958034,0.0002827304,0.000021057944,0.00017875122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014297453,0.00014652645,0.00048116632,0.001773464,0.000077439145,0.00014516118,0.00039890234,0.000088825625,0.0002596606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069467555,0.00012959787,0.00027619817,0.0005030307,0.000031158925,0.00039442387,0.000012652976,0.0002707066,0.00011823673],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003570562,0.00003821602,0.38381848,0.000002179116,0.0001763761,0.000018365028,0.0016614997,0.5945744,1.2148256e-7,0.01910544,0.0004297777,0.00013948182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083580933,0.000107635744,0.4790027,0.00000736531,0.00006139081,0.00008025705,0.00062928174,0.42212296,0.0000011727159,0.032978907,0.063950956,0.0002215663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4705971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48217863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17245142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060182426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007151377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5329282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}