{"meta":{"query_hash":"7fdeff9e80bc","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Forest Economics"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7fdeff9e80bc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Forest+Economics"},"results":[{"id":"W175155875","doi":"10.1108/j.jfe.2001.12.004","title":"Wood Trade Flows: an Empirical Analysis of Greek Wood Imports","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Aging","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; International economics; Environmental science; International trade","score_opus":0.06171463112932691,"score_gpt":0.25111999776405725,"score_spread":0.18940536663473034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W175155875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99575114,0.00023649725,0.00030995297,0.000046694124,0.0000031032682,0.000009364457,0.00093043194,0.000015749389,0.0026970755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99553597,0.00033802068,0.00019840477,0.000013063906,0.0000065625327,0.000010200402,0.003000987,0.000012581578,0.00088422763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968183,0.00006851016,0.00004058934,0.00007225323,0.00007046778,0.00006630204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754566,0.0013831207,0.000633289,0.0001823032,0.0001618057,0.00009378197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006078244,0.00036453985,0.0004512547,0.0023548969,0.0002713134,0.0012005679,0.0002720638,0.0004990187,0.0037244554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030925663,0.0002574108,0.0009101692,0.003991503,0.00074571656,0.0011740123,0.00087181083,0.0007280136,0.0010730134],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010382743,0.00038814163,0.8692312,0.00036057498,0.0004250772,0.0029547175,0.003204677,0.071626276,0.0028759665,0.008444955,0.002719634,0.036730498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053426258,0.00025528163,0.9155463,0.0001293587,0.00013973331,0.0014554929,0.004359256,0.06444793,0.0021517356,0.004034301,0.0073704394,0.00005671315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0083215535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038400695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0083215535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009485336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004226583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01654625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970415148","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2010.07.001","title":"Carbon sequestration and the optimal forest harvest decision: A dynamic programming approach considering biomass and dead organic matter","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Environmental science; Taiga; Biomass (ecology); Carbon fibers; Carbon cycle; Carbon sink; Organic matter; Boreal; Agroforestry; Forestry; Carbon dioxide; Ecology; Ecosystem; Mathematics; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.006886777862216755,"score_gpt":0.20838103921187712,"score_spread":0.20149426134966036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970415148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7685948,0.00078031194,0.21502551,0.0017823699,0.00006098958,0.00015139354,0.00043349832,0.0001129497,0.013058074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833278,0.0002925632,0.013057529,0.000069490976,0.000023528646,0.00008421714,0.00011395383,0.000020762669,0.003010172],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968433,0.00011918859,0.0000067602514,0.000037617152,0.00003158882,0.00012050675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883395,0.0009239451,0.000079900215,0.000010533605,0.00006462217,0.000087067994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001126846,0.0010912005,0.0010292453,0.00075846835,0.00073712296,0.0020509923,0.0008195501,0.0015456929,0.002375931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002430885,0.00090702326,0.00086794747,0.0006822467,0.0014768786,0.0010552091,0.00072489376,0.0013973375,0.0001160359],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028922024,0.000021887943,0.00050012063,0.000007178146,0.000012309973,0.000022226885,0.000008957592,0.99708384,0.000112914364,0.0013211506,0.000063817,0.00081661186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012946056,0.000022922794,0.00021326545,0.0000029081757,0.000008610463,0.0000031425332,0.000017261267,0.9980064,0.00006308883,0.0015812754,0.00006340036,0.0000047665594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0987564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07616352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0987564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004203004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045623444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19636315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981242896","doi":"10.1078/1104-6899-00016","title":"Is there an Environmental Kuznets Curve for clearcutting in Canadian forests?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Energy, Environment, Economic Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Clearcutting; Kuznets curve; Economics; Environmental science; Forestry; Geography; Econometrics","score_opus":0.02882734829577511,"score_gpt":0.2022421210887582,"score_spread":0.1734147727929831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981242896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.873767,0.0049369335,0.0099583585,0.02179842,0.00013244845,0.000115795265,0.0036223966,0.00032959125,0.08533898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9852894,0.0013551294,0.00087648607,0.0007558002,0.00005457332,0.000012872518,0.0008278591,0.00007125689,0.010756557],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909544,0.00007986261,0.00003517706,0.00014316334,0.00018758852,0.00045882136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98831904,0.0035943615,0.0014538774,0.0007814112,0.003601749,0.0022495845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023915875,0.00043828867,0.0013880387,0.0021587322,0.0030089968,0.0033495557,0.0020752028,0.0022673372,0.017902408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024078134,0.00049177505,0.0013549526,0.0029154134,0.0045403903,0.0029453854,0.001308217,0.003344636,0.0006351083],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063758914,0.00013796777,0.20666964,0.00039555845,0.0001831994,0.0005205362,0.0026224477,0.070997484,0.0013175659,0.5927123,0.059860654,0.06394501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013330755,0.00007381387,0.48416868,0.00033070607,0.0002330361,0.00036529693,0.0075578946,0.12576726,0.000708678,0.34253988,0.03784093,0.0002804064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9668053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9614066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03319472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031558856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027454887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2289766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991106256","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2011.12.002","title":"Optimal forest harvest age considering carbon sequestration in multiple carbon pools: A comparative statics analysis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Carbon sequestration; Comparative statics; Biomass (ecology); Environmental science; Carbon fibers; Organic matter; Pulp and paper industry; Ecology; Mathematics; Economics; Biology; Carbon dioxide; Engineering","score_opus":0.04217126765352515,"score_gpt":0.2660569132719365,"score_spread":0.22388564561841134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991106256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52789795,0.0032148908,0.38022035,0.0044974824,0.00014718711,0.00020458507,0.0015427694,0.00030829635,0.08196647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752745,0.0009310584,0.014929974,0.00018905861,0.000059485392,0.000102486236,0.00016262782,0.000057365793,0.00829339],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956995,0.00015580238,0.000011521035,0.00007399762,0.00006179868,0.00012688371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982633,0.0012362705,0.00019849993,0.000060846403,0.00011036864,0.00013075376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002659473,0.00086667645,0.0013625874,0.0012489228,0.0006792587,0.0023638357,0.0010158307,0.0017758143,0.0088357385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005990796,0.00078845664,0.0015317046,0.0009778156,0.0012000776,0.0033843701,0.0009827956,0.001326391,0.00044526448],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013277447,0.000078420206,0.0018048271,0.0001171849,0.00007438063,0.000212241,0.00007742487,0.83280134,0.0020437,0.15114053,0.0014029336,0.010114305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000577004,0.00020236356,0.0034548475,0.00009166708,0.0001527947,0.00017340366,0.00016882038,0.86176205,0.00081027485,0.13017611,0.0028818196,0.00006816759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065747807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069576516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0088357385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004738327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025460022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034379184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995084187","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2007.10.001","title":"Revitalized? An event study of forest policy reform in British Columbia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Event (particle physics); Forestry; Economics; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.010095431880801574,"score_gpt":0.25244154509599365,"score_spread":0.24234611321519206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995084187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877588,0.00021795185,0.000041733172,0.0026387095,0.000014019794,0.000043606207,0.00047819785,0.0000044910657,0.008802458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896528,0.00029640394,0.000063885316,0.0005340382,0.00001103664,0.00004491307,0.00044327736,0.0000063191783,0.008947228],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980463,0.00042203767,0.000056251727,0.00013970917,0.0002736025,0.0010620534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99160165,0.0019011913,0.0010444865,0.00045184046,0.0022624235,0.0027384125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001850823,0.0001583394,0.0004871691,0.0010858973,0.0089574475,0.0037577194,0.001909149,0.0017009993,0.005479023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008057791,0.00029006405,0.00014820021,0.0040138355,0.0021860453,0.0012850178,0.0020763336,0.003651595,0.00035369123],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025000675,0.0036356172,0.6794003,0.00020305575,0.0001932891,0.002389306,0.11083091,0.0037916475,0.001279118,0.024525223,0.07520814,0.09604334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073283765,0.00009500453,0.8529938,0.00008860413,0.00003497856,0.000050602244,0.11655762,0.0014229311,0.00017978487,0.00080392504,0.027653085,0.000046394594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98454803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99478287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94984764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050152384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041033052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36388272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016301066","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2006.11.001","title":"The J-curve effect and the US–Canada forest products trade","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Agricultural economics; International trade; International economics; Environmental science; Forestry; Geography","score_opus":0.015490064281715335,"score_gpt":0.18142730349409253,"score_spread":0.16593723921237719,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016301066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8759764,0.00426165,0.0111894915,0.009684796,0.0002112177,0.00004242566,0.0019924475,0.00017682875,0.09646478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890091,0.0009698797,0.00044568325,0.00014739492,0.000033463337,0.0000034290415,0.00026076453,0.000025707932,0.009104472],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996908,0.000047579422,0.000011222337,0.000064117135,0.00007989695,0.00010649265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977349,0.0008251578,0.00026956442,0.00011020706,0.0008053542,0.00025489618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012171732,0.0002478146,0.0004330441,0.001081108,0.0011333779,0.0025347965,0.0005676648,0.0008232139,0.009399735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062515,0.00021591113,0.00049005257,0.0018249395,0.0012443447,0.0016987426,0.0006203088,0.001409267,0.00042495466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007464859,0.00019531966,0.20919736,0.00017062781,0.0003000849,0.001099767,0.0018677505,0.11943573,0.0023713838,0.5668883,0.034040045,0.063687235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020271903,0.000098495,0.46556646,0.00017248618,0.00053992483,0.0002924484,0.0044478066,0.30859977,0.0013045544,0.16221718,0.056366026,0.00019211089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9059164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89247745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09408361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008742677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007903021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18927532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029913253","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2009.01.001","title":"Use of composite forest commodity price indices for cointegration analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Market Dynamics and Volatility","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Econometrics; Commodity; Economics; Product (mathematics); Spot contract; Forest product; Time series; Financial economics; Mathematics; Statistics; Finance; Geography; Forestry","score_opus":0.038266986067535494,"score_gpt":0.2397128765651756,"score_spread":0.2014458904976401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029913253","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.105415106,0.00020699472,0.887879,0.00006703071,0.00006534756,0.000048526817,0.0003627676,0.00048644486,0.0054688267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5870004,0.00021008082,0.41028592,0.00002031058,0.00004015685,0.00007015986,0.0005891775,0.00020941612,0.0015743949],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994168,0.0002533268,0.000035083023,0.000088716675,0.00016856965,0.000037496964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972288,0.0012689928,0.00021621143,0.00052516465,0.0006889331,0.00007187441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018218359,0.00044060856,0.00053210754,0.0026772346,0.0004075265,0.0014125031,0.00051209726,0.00031700067,0.0029437307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008117046,0.00026780026,0.0006459388,0.0033109873,0.00029742176,0.001690124,0.00074955536,0.00086685445,0.00044630177],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043451972,0.00022697818,0.047447626,0.00015631136,0.0002690104,0.00052465894,0.00036819646,0.14862785,0.02444993,0.25853068,0.0037433654,0.51522094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029972252,0.00007309313,0.015454984,0.000021890059,0.00007329885,0.00012081871,0.000058711714,0.91961485,0.006334884,0.05342623,0.004754597,0.00003664133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026923965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003845619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029437307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003974345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071196986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00984776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042058727","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2010.07.002","title":"U.S. softwood lumber demand and supply estimation using cointegration in dynamic equations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cointegration; Softwood; Economics; Estimation; Econometrics; Supply and demand; Macroeconomics; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering","score_opus":0.007400660040508301,"score_gpt":0.2362377680017909,"score_spread":0.2288371079612826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042058727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173152,0.0006304343,0.0572738,0.0005583759,0.000046629524,0.00007386736,0.011129721,0.00029878164,0.012673328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95837516,0.0004179783,0.02105012,0.00007076878,0.000019164136,0.00006555,0.013337951,0.000045711728,0.006617563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942076,0.00019186521,0.00004785952,0.00016748067,0.00010320822,0.00006886285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840575,0.0009101304,0.0002681283,0.000107990854,0.00027201197,0.00003597974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096638495,0.00043681878,0.0005051117,0.0015791752,0.00033535206,0.0009740119,0.00030205742,0.00032406987,0.004914226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004186301,0.00044554894,0.0006641842,0.002562768,0.00019746045,0.0007820317,0.0005618345,0.00058026507,0.0009261606],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000161354,0.00026488624,0.5786049,0.00019649263,0.00059829967,0.00037091054,0.0006844911,0.2341089,0.0015817118,0.025467623,0.012141749,0.1458187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071959046,0.00027848504,0.33889878,0.00013912651,0.00042756947,0.00020093935,0.0009482773,0.599013,0.003935911,0.01812412,0.037867587,0.00009433668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18004814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18825133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18004814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013784176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017516628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35800028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2056117360","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2009.05.002","title":"Assessing costs and benefits of pest management on forested landbases in eastern and western Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Spruce budworm; Net present value; Choristoneura fumiferana; Cost–benefit analysis; License; Forest protection; Integrated pest management; Liberian dollar; Agricultural science; Pest control; Forestry; Forest management; PEST analysis; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Business; Tortricidae; Agricultural economics; Geography; Ecology; Economics; Biology; Production (economics); Finance","score_opus":0.01477214278560954,"score_gpt":0.2289931480566961,"score_spread":0.21422100527108656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2056117360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99825174,0.000100775076,0.00007170949,0.00004999282,0.0000012356879,0.000030246512,0.000370018,0.000005748678,0.0011185965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976961,0.0001440966,0.00040328878,0.000018403038,0.000001178097,0.000008391485,0.000419308,0.0000025604666,0.0013066782],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926704,0.00010541747,0.00003679436,0.000056988927,0.000275589,0.00025814958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984743,0.0003443607,0.00021745026,0.000031765336,0.00058633485,0.00034575534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057933,0.00035837034,0.00030067828,0.0011890477,0.0012694879,0.0012087725,0.0010147904,0.0003404597,0.0013099188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022336121,0.00027268135,0.00043396105,0.0015870898,0.00065134646,0.0004538744,0.00061611366,0.00034118377,0.00009693609],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012175891,0.00026923185,0.9140703,0.00010944015,0.00028728842,0.0005361256,0.0008242738,0.045486726,0.0029209796,0.0009189968,0.0013119644,0.032047074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006302024,0.0001794487,0.95835227,0.000036474223,0.00012770688,0.00007197584,0.003004229,0.035181988,0.0010894104,0.00022953041,0.001636604,0.0000275146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99347067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046197448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046197448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01868925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3351875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060674783","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2005.05.001","title":"A mill-specific roundwood demand equation for southern and central Finland","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Mill; Economics; Forestry; Environmental science; Econometrics; Agricultural economics; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.015339432085764536,"score_gpt":0.20787680628117142,"score_spread":0.19253737419540687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060674783","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96527094,0.0001549874,0.018865658,0.00039311973,0.000018837642,0.000034165943,0.007888893,0.00010346031,0.007269918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98257565,0.000085000764,0.0047752466,0.000033884568,0.000010406048,0.000048271413,0.0065148645,0.000023423701,0.005933164],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99984324,0.000034794048,0.0000132637115,0.000048655875,0.000025954576,0.000034036246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990121,0.00072974985,0.00006174217,0.000041241325,0.00012387776,0.00003136954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005282782,0.00035393934,0.0004295533,0.0003878978,0.00037738815,0.0007500995,0.00089625764,0.0010175621,0.008122542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019828877,0.00066711765,0.00087907125,0.00084607094,0.00018220131,0.00077603705,0.00041818214,0.00065056974,0.0009017814],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011741588,0.00009325533,0.045867983,0.00009779862,0.00010184238,0.0003874157,0.00026960863,0.92865914,0.0019256809,0.008005774,0.0027337763,0.01174033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004926548,0.000032755634,0.04242357,0.000030482437,0.00007619516,0.00011969874,0.0003570354,0.95075625,0.0008883857,0.0025588472,0.0026455985,0.00006190134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1725021,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10354424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1725021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018004494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017600809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34299606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2065872677","doi":"10.1078/1104-6899-00020","title":"Economic indicators of sustainable forest management: theory versus practice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Natural capital; Variety (cybernetics); Divergence (linguistics); Sustainable forest management; Forest management; Economics; Environmental resource management; Natural resource economics; Natural resource; Business; Ecology; Geography; Forestry; Ecosystem services","score_opus":0.004758340320926345,"score_gpt":0.21078090974757313,"score_spread":0.2060225694266468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2065872677","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071483925,0.13947898,0.21300514,0.18990816,0.0024823097,0.00028314634,0.0012980871,0.00045783567,0.38160238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181657,0.042176567,0.03308387,0.0016740343,0.001474077,0.00018135918,0.0002533604,0.000058839523,0.002932124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870985,0.007796053,0.00072435994,0.0005261184,0.0035997103,0.00025523518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94284254,0.040744893,0.0042722644,0.0021856695,0.008963087,0.0009915277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020029824,0.00074384926,0.0009659082,0.010694843,0.0008206379,0.014499553,0.0013187043,0.0018496414,0.004769832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057810184,0.00024329782,0.00027123452,0.01217829,0.01056323,0.008376638,0.0032066354,0.0026839706,0.000679118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028904378,0.000045179248,0.0037752367,0.00057278667,0.0000282122,0.000023307728,0.0003104951,0.0061908765,0.00007192718,0.9140249,0.0066359686,0.068292156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020163427,0.000062031606,0.0047705467,0.0037265029,0.000025497662,0.0000574017,0.0019961908,0.018714273,0.00057863974,0.89955395,0.07044381,0.000051005954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016021476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00121387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020029824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051876456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039040332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10592914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068189185","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2014.03.001","title":"The effect of collective forestland tenure reform in China: Does land parcelization reduce forest management intensity?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities; Beijing Forestry University; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet; University of Missouri","keywords":"China; Forest management; Land tenure; Intensity (physics); Business; Natural resource economics; Economics; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Agroforestry; Geography","score_opus":0.0031773874668343948,"score_gpt":0.19854419895858888,"score_spread":0.19536681149175447,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068189185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986688,0.00015685945,0.000056944165,0.0003794993,0.0000042267075,0.00001295534,0.00004627418,0.0000037181228,0.0006707424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995714,0.000054222943,0.00003446351,0.00006413308,0.000003092618,0.0000045316524,0.000049023176,6.2973e-7,0.00021846553],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985611,0.00035277897,0.0000577591,0.00017046167,0.00019179235,0.00066614576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751353,0.00033244578,0.0010234545,0.00017110117,0.00036715384,0.0005922905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001436878,0.00029828958,0.0004883759,0.0005275609,0.0007256662,0.0008747506,0.000689218,0.0005147593,0.0017434842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002910819,0.00017338204,0.0005880503,0.00092524034,0.0011634213,0.0006974513,0.0009883017,0.00049473735,0.0000754771],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039347494,0.0005260987,0.9700211,0.00006672575,0.00026830687,0.0003632098,0.0009285203,0.0034586668,0.0016133239,0.0015660735,0.0007291744,0.020065201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020717178,0.00012261483,0.9972168,0.0000060797543,0.000044666132,0.000010081495,0.0005822474,0.0011323413,0.00023136944,0.00013862275,0.0004885849,0.0000058083283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15956177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25989935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15956177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004526661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00532143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.317266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2103582910","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2005.07.002","title":"Economic efficiency and shadow prices of social and biological outputs of village-level organizations of joint forest management in Gujarat, India","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Shadow price; Joint Forest Management; Shadow (psychology); Joint (building); Natural resource economics; Economics; Forest management; Business; Agricultural economics; Geography; Forestry; Mathematics; Engineering; Civil engineering","score_opus":0.018599596968482537,"score_gpt":0.20299756972099203,"score_spread":0.1843979727525095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103582910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994312,0.0000046545524,0.000053681713,0.000016557355,2.1902154e-7,0.0000010205424,0.00002219648,9.700656e-7,0.0004694151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998049,0.0000023569614,0.000016870963,0.0000010417632,3.3863444e-7,7.077928e-7,0.000017970835,3.7182e-7,0.00015547339],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926776,0.0002972544,0.000033855293,0.00007237452,0.00009285152,0.00023603775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99534684,0.0028038172,0.0008041663,0.00019400398,0.0004072086,0.0004440181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007627379,0.0001406297,0.00022767941,0.00063623337,0.0005768354,0.0016949414,0.0005136994,0.00029797637,0.0021130634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043851486,0.00019459668,0.00029886744,0.0009671343,0.001233949,0.0007400682,0.0008740399,0.00040313436,0.00020427792],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010080716,0.00019070879,0.920698,0.000037722173,0.00018628784,0.00094652374,0.006021927,0.042331163,0.0027188577,0.015854217,0.00054718537,0.009459386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019984862,0.00011088992,0.9738365,0.0000040154796,0.000033755427,0.00011006527,0.0043714335,0.018751308,0.0003664332,0.0021436152,0.00023834214,0.000013791691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04239513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05223801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04239513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023868266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007357264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0842967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137274029","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2009.11.002","title":"Contrasting two approaches in real options valuation: Contingent claims versus dynamic programming","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Capital Investment and Risk Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Futures contract; Valuation (finance); Convenience yield; Economics; Dynamic programming; Discounting; Constant (computer programming); Econometrics; Yield (engineering); Investment (military); Actuarial science; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Spot contract; Financial economics; Mathematics; Mathematical optimization; Finance","score_opus":0.09980356780401368,"score_gpt":0.2776634206280657,"score_spread":0.17785985282405203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137274029","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01934755,0.0055657243,0.95401984,0.0026547748,0.0002187001,0.00007299461,0.000043941043,0.000063695334,0.01801275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.641046,0.007421909,0.34619114,0.0005028947,0.0008202531,0.00041624537,0.000100406534,0.00014193649,0.0033591045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028945,0.006528736,0.00033772402,0.00046162747,0.0020750347,0.00030752234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9793661,0.016900912,0.0010133267,0.0012275504,0.0010792724,0.00041287797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012680867,0.001698956,0.0016953512,0.0031759087,0.00060231594,0.005552268,0.0028241244,0.0034775566,0.0035774237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02712873,0.0007123547,0.0022321427,0.0029501505,0.0056848316,0.009935715,0.0034903947,0.0054747425,0.00054481893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010093686,0.0000835501,0.00048724003,0.00021871607,0.000066587934,0.00008728395,0.00032097023,0.08081282,0.00039420192,0.865027,0.0005661605,0.0518346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042965912,0.00012472179,0.00046252992,0.0002624384,0.000028701801,0.00015325236,0.00021395386,0.20648319,0.0006735193,0.7879291,0.0035378174,0.000087722125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006890948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000587094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012680867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002120529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012052038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06706369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195146120","doi":"10.1108/j.jfe.2001.03.003","title":"Fuelwood Collection in North-eastern Zimbabwe: Valuation and Caloric Expenditures","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Energy and Environment Impacts","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture Food and Rural Development; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Caloric theory; Valuation (finance); Economics; Agricultural economics; Environmental science; Natural resource economics; Finance; Medicine","score_opus":0.014270639221294434,"score_gpt":0.20599346521790227,"score_spread":0.19172282599660784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195146120","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967303,0.00020426778,0.0009356,0.00017728301,0.0000010298212,0.000019063244,0.000106023785,0.0000024551532,0.0018240158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99851793,0.00023603076,0.00033737582,0.000009197702,8.9902204e-7,0.0000122316505,0.00005455388,8.9005607e-7,0.00083088764],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99982077,0.00007427676,0.000005040315,0.000016923344,0.000015933743,0.00006709508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999648,0.00023628412,0.000056839373,0.000015826894,0.000018853676,0.000024227264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032560775,0.00028617773,0.00026556154,0.0005500294,0.0005419362,0.0016961794,0.0005002391,0.0004951462,0.0024809854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011507444,0.00026093618,0.00031709587,0.0009205241,0.00069773913,0.0008485912,0.00047674167,0.00039253355,0.00012575724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064242724,0.00039528855,0.42193884,0.00020981465,0.00030538248,0.0019791427,0.0028877582,0.46937186,0.005405111,0.056401238,0.0011347374,0.039328363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011525546,0.0003423936,0.2752191,0.00013083553,0.0001804654,0.0003696185,0.0042912764,0.69558644,0.001684089,0.016837645,0.005184871,0.00005796912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11673862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13100757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11673862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00268394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006091572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23211825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529484772","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2017.09.002","title":"Forest land value and rotation with an alternative land use","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Value (mathematics); Rotation (mathematics); Land value; Function (biology); Constant (computer programming); Tree (set theory); Land use; Mathematics; Agroforestry; Economics; Computer science; Natural resource economics; Ecology; Environmental science; Statistics; Combinatorics; Geometry; Biology","score_opus":0.022773198667396664,"score_gpt":0.25105765634906374,"score_spread":0.22828445768166708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529484772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6676824,0.0013199802,0.27542508,0.0024323098,0.0001105706,0.00014234884,0.00033502953,0.000072447336,0.052479822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97441,0.0003719627,0.021281047,0.000036854643,0.000036229394,0.000033615983,0.000066210305,0.000015441474,0.0037485429],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951375,0.00020480932,0.00001821656,0.00009772513,0.00005882795,0.00010664838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877733,0.0007157966,0.0002565665,0.000082114784,0.000051883813,0.000116295334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097529974,0.00053786335,0.00047120018,0.00042691318,0.000411748,0.0013954139,0.00067355245,0.001108341,0.0055806343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049169897,0.00020053497,0.00047527452,0.00082202826,0.0016670981,0.0034655505,0.00082612375,0.0010121429,0.00029050242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034785995,0.00018368012,0.004841197,0.00016009725,0.00005606238,0.0002998117,0.00020931507,0.47946486,0.0024741674,0.45329463,0.0024707296,0.05619763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094601266,0.00039685468,0.00486391,0.000070768794,0.000035965844,0.0002946173,0.0003448816,0.39444995,0.0021308642,0.58735853,0.009914733,0.000044280994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001702472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014178791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055806343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001351442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066207466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018669069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900666964","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2018.10.004","title":"Economic impacts of conservation area strategies in Alberta, Canada: A CGE model analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computable general equilibrium; Natural resource economics; Economic impact analysis; Rationalization (economics); Economics; Natural resource; Land use; Environmental resource management; Ecology","score_opus":0.04722418757773488,"score_gpt":0.21181620351946442,"score_spread":0.16459201594172954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900666964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9360159,0.00069423823,0.007160305,0.0019060133,0.000064568725,0.00015658102,0.0053149555,0.00015093993,0.04853641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857487,0.00047757753,0.00293662,0.0001045197,0.000010680823,0.000056181576,0.0016727818,0.000019155734,0.008973763],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966896,0.000071745846,0.000008972007,0.000037973627,0.00007141477,0.00014105011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916244,0.0003182765,0.000059664635,0.000026836748,0.00032403125,0.00010879845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008241841,0.0008374426,0.0007384708,0.0013149312,0.0015534976,0.0021672444,0.0022836928,0.0013747475,0.0036621059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015935656,0.00048225725,0.0009108533,0.0018806162,0.00125639,0.0007098253,0.0008106696,0.0012253001,0.00017728389],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095185955,0.000047654674,0.006279602,0.000018598146,0.00003034644,0.0000776463,0.000026432588,0.9864737,0.00011887323,0.003879852,0.0010960905,0.0018561246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007217377,0.000030387668,0.004756921,0.000014137846,0.00004943708,0.000013452001,0.00021498748,0.99201584,0.00010667284,0.0010284154,0.0016730465,0.00002455392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9678716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032128416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021236062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23310906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2964480981","doi":"10.1561/112.00000446","title":"Carbon Uptake and Forest Management under Uncertainty: Why Natural Disturbance Matters","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Disturbance (geology); Forest management; Natural (archaeology); Environmental science; Carbon fibers; Natural resource economics; Natural forest; Environmental resource management; Economics; Forestry; Agroforestry; Geography; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.005479337576814682,"score_gpt":0.19285458683060647,"score_spread":0.1873752492537918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2964480981","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8404465,0.011355373,0.038541652,0.048712373,0.0002578497,0.000049291983,0.0003515314,0.000088123976,0.06019732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978567,0.0009708771,0.00033114423,0.00026939297,0.000063346306,0.0000039438296,0.000011270392,0.000006226625,0.00048696963],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930465,0.00029645904,0.000027711178,0.00009445628,0.000119688026,0.00015688765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994038,0.004146415,0.0009602691,0.00013881578,0.0004032489,0.0003132226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017374752,0.0002149607,0.00048808902,0.00041024777,0.0006718487,0.0031663538,0.00046873163,0.0015223005,0.0022896533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011106343,0.00016296451,0.0002854205,0.0005906749,0.002017822,0.004147738,0.00091704517,0.001159412,0.00012962033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036847993,0.0002465401,0.15439571,0.0004800765,0.00033562398,0.0013567868,0.0012138461,0.365723,0.0022708646,0.33454487,0.0064567085,0.13260747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029682762,0.00019328328,0.08241709,0.00024337064,0.00007700562,0.00039296335,0.002987363,0.20543608,0.00092323986,0.6974563,0.009729964,0.00011368348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014575694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011533868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014575694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020867337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009474827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028981686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123112265","doi":"10.1108/j.jfe.2001.12.003","title":"Welfare Implications of the Allowable Cut Effect in the Context of Sustained Yield and Sustainable Development Forestry","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Environmental Conservation and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Agriculture Food and Rural Development","funders":"","keywords":"Yield (engineering); Welfare; Context (archaeology); Sustainable development; Economics; Forestry; Natural resource economics; Political science; Physics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.008133451360486647,"score_gpt":0.19992637918357123,"score_spread":0.19179292782308457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123112265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35557404,0.011077839,0.073444836,0.06868838,0.00069947273,0.000089119,0.00035636657,0.000034679597,0.4900352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989725,0.0017881208,0.001741131,0.0014386128,0.0002879614,0.000038582086,0.00002768182,0.000009227585,0.004943631],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714714,0.0015203661,0.0000672863,0.0002166664,0.00048625268,0.00056227937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441695,0.0036302,0.00067430234,0.00026537816,0.00074109976,0.00027211432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039678407,0.00034220977,0.000494352,0.00084126287,0.0019171331,0.0040072603,0.0006970177,0.0032262206,0.0041501713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008713748,0.00018430561,0.00052022113,0.0007548217,0.0064628404,0.004089163,0.0032572714,0.0032716994,0.00013449887],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029320901,0.000031376527,0.0011025895,0.000037289414,0.000015689695,0.00015647413,0.00022195176,0.0036750636,0.0002467807,0.9864938,0.0009266017,0.0070628915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008197381,0.00004073416,0.0018701644,0.000085210864,0.000023008679,0.000081475664,0.00047144337,0.0022586044,0.0001774821,0.9837802,0.011190178,0.00001331338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026417682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004293662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0041501713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031611188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023241243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022935629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162582394","doi":"10.1561/112.00000536","title":"A Theoretical Modeling Framework to Support Investment Decisions in Green and Grey Infrastructure under Risk and Uncertainty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Investment (military); Green infrastructure; Investment decisions; Economics; Business; Actuarial science; Environmental resource management; Microeconomics; Production (economics); Political science","score_opus":0.042060113264722615,"score_gpt":0.32159316033807406,"score_spread":0.27953304707335147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162582394","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026364762,0.0003743077,0.93799424,0.0038043016,0.000081672115,0.00012796403,0.00059922173,0.00017649557,0.030476991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85752046,0.0012616488,0.12427253,0.0003954081,0.00015524577,0.00075754424,0.00049239374,0.0000889275,0.015055764],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991671,0.00036629656,0.00003496908,0.00013010953,0.00016239437,0.00013922011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973807,0.001762197,0.0003582537,0.00008341122,0.00029411842,0.00012132743],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002149614,0.0011542905,0.0010893974,0.0013355546,0.0008394216,0.0027507374,0.0023507378,0.0032033143,0.008485432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005147973,0.000745051,0.0013403357,0.0012231785,0.0017004918,0.002491214,0.0014266465,0.0023101324,0.0006821355],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065534514,0.00002205568,0.00019813345,0.000024124593,0.000008865873,0.000051635503,0.000028593007,0.8592105,0.00015414352,0.13854924,0.00042927344,0.0013167957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010453744,0.000016733846,0.00007088074,0.000013802035,0.00000806421,0.000015658901,0.000022722097,0.9463065,0.00006970761,0.05244801,0.0010066685,0.000010686207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01451481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009957681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01451481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003700744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00439571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028860629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194416414","doi":"10.1561/112.00000541","title":"Designing Voluntary Subsidies for Forest Owners under Imperfect Information","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme; Agence Nationale de la Recherche; European Commission; Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute","keywords":"Subsidy; Turnover; Imperfect; Perfect information; Natural resource economics; Economics; Business; Forestry; Environmental science; Microeconomics; Geography; Market economy","score_opus":0.05857575700544583,"score_gpt":0.20857170280315107,"score_spread":0.14999594579770525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194416414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50649023,0.00068883406,0.4766151,0.0028372682,0.000102027254,0.00056221295,0.00021077307,0.00042828437,0.012065274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831013,0.00011351308,0.015265979,0.000096626405,0.000023499975,0.00009572671,0.000018502124,0.000016730268,0.0012680884],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996376,0.0018003286,0.00012158808,0.0005509496,0.00040274713,0.00074836804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9753136,0.01869827,0.0031988157,0.0013412415,0.0007728159,0.00067524845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006522205,0.00062176096,0.0014649461,0.00051135465,0.00066521624,0.0016705269,0.0017186546,0.002294818,0.0034354567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023833115,0.00079619105,0.0005080752,0.0005541373,0.0019969323,0.0034904662,0.0014840913,0.0017602763,0.00027676256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014669565,0.0009070749,0.00895396,0.0005414235,0.00019308539,0.00093708764,0.0009620365,0.62524164,0.01927594,0.25292653,0.0023883476,0.08620589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045618994,0.00039189155,0.0027519742,0.00007504009,0.00008080718,0.00014692696,0.00038709657,0.80678445,0.0034889013,0.18148775,0.0038973659,0.00005158369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002893026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024620874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006522205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025992314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031294627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03449315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205906111","doi":"10.1561/112.00000534","title":"A Gravity Model of Softwood Lumber Trade: An Application to the Canada-U.S. Trade Dispute","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Gravity model of trade; China; Economics; Softwood; Value (mathematics); International economics; International trade; Agricultural economics; Geography; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009555421804016079,"score_gpt":0.20999748237655214,"score_spread":0.20044206057253605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205906111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7508883,0.0022219487,0.13237746,0.007954084,0.0002133564,0.00064983394,0.008101727,0.00064406433,0.09694924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728074,0.000721399,0.009698171,0.00020286455,0.00006148703,0.00016054107,0.0016367179,0.00006870097,0.014642649],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990728,0.00024111991,0.000034563265,0.00015782866,0.00021820814,0.00027550786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980666,0.00085165974,0.000320827,0.00009835622,0.00045394868,0.0002086511],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002263692,0.0005834261,0.00090504624,0.0025936575,0.0016946227,0.0024648295,0.0030165252,0.0014591848,0.007658971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004811522,0.00040629954,0.0018281144,0.003161415,0.0022339383,0.0012349843,0.0021674724,0.0019427699,0.00039832565],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006232951,0.00010013019,0.038998537,0.00006906852,0.00009753365,0.0005846876,0.0006438059,0.5921395,0.00026906212,0.34064597,0.011878477,0.014510856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000857804,0.000038402388,0.01346401,0.000034924047,0.00006622884,0.00011182678,0.00065197237,0.9238104,0.00009236049,0.048938695,0.012654264,0.000051092822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77975106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56890714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22024894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014825372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011043194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44309205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207734094","doi":"10.1561/112.00000535","title":"On the Asymmetric Effects of Exchange Rate Changes on Trade Flows: Evidence from the U.S.-Canada Trade in Forest Products","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Exchange rate; International economics; International trade; Monetary economics","score_opus":0.0480096750611566,"score_gpt":0.19899679172336096,"score_spread":0.15098711666220435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207734094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98686045,0.00084890967,0.000173827,0.0008971538,0.0000071290883,0.000006321826,0.0006483475,0.0000050423046,0.010552708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770916,0.00092307717,0.00007115149,0.00010147649,0.000010462837,0.0000012849733,0.0005506088,0.0000042255183,0.00062850554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923193,0.00017774575,0.000056025634,0.00009195,0.00029303893,0.00014938672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921069,0.0027997724,0.0030413074,0.00039166352,0.0012334757,0.00042695642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011686846,0.00020563338,0.0002865646,0.0012089055,0.0011170874,0.0018119186,0.0003342002,0.00038742108,0.002973579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074656517,0.00010673091,0.00032991392,0.0028841828,0.001387376,0.00081183616,0.0008100557,0.000912279,0.00030582235],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047557952,0.000079826976,0.963465,0.0000766013,0.00024894846,0.00055041467,0.002313328,0.002201349,0.00076779065,0.005622194,0.0017112923,0.022487747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001738311,0.000029259418,0.99057955,0.00004412457,0.00015691092,0.00007698177,0.0036033622,0.0013207372,0.00040524532,0.0010916761,0.002650962,0.00002375849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71282285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7740401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28717715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003267996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029925613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57773674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391997941","doi":"10.1561/112.00000571","title":"Estimating the Effects of Covid-19 and Softwood Lumber Prices","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Softwood; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Economics; Econometrics; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Environmental science; Pulp and paper industry; Engineering; Biology; Medicine","score_opus":0.007425337729623586,"score_gpt":0.24216784811519032,"score_spread":0.23474251038556673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391997941","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98836005,0.00016826186,0.008228916,0.0005313586,0.000022572822,0.00007416181,0.0008933887,0.000043483706,0.0016777243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967109,0.00007415356,0.0018903778,0.000059556456,0.000010132001,0.000027339345,0.0006186201,0.0000054122743,0.0006035784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675,0.0017867605,0.00015013615,0.0005229351,0.0002584046,0.0005316457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686571,0.024667865,0.004205056,0.0011686712,0.00068439264,0.00061695836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008185199,0.0005009956,0.0005578942,0.0008871986,0.00045606348,0.0020380197,0.0016534077,0.0016228388,0.0027822554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031877737,0.00055498775,0.001316008,0.00101617,0.0011154903,0.001261786,0.001636137,0.0026422848,0.00028588486],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006802332,0.0008292519,0.8082799,0.000073954434,0.0006613488,0.00038249366,0.0002565087,0.16412745,0.0008235188,0.009795101,0.00082004454,0.01327028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014063079,0.00082712044,0.32844973,0.000040664057,0.0004441593,0.00010227809,0.00091624074,0.6596006,0.0017908516,0.0058093416,0.0017814096,0.00009701742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08282068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050672702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08282068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00208686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018212463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1646772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400778471","doi":"10.1561/112.00000579","title":"The Impact of Forest Policy Modernization in British Columbia: A Stock Market Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Modernization theory; Perspective (graphical); Stock market; Stock (firearms); Economics; Natural resource economics; Forestry; Agricultural economics; Geography; Economic growth; Archaeology","score_opus":0.006805596908157408,"score_gpt":0.24443948542296015,"score_spread":0.23763388851480274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400778471","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98646325,0.0006438393,0.00008303865,0.0014807166,0.0000122201645,0.000016734317,0.00094674306,0.000010126854,0.01034339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960498,0.0005237235,0.000047205922,0.00014287073,0.000008176713,0.0000033722188,0.0005429356,0.0000018942264,0.0026800465],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934775,0.00005096152,0.00002730069,0.00004729136,0.00027957052,0.00024706437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671835,0.0005396283,0.0008667962,0.00007456543,0.0012597624,0.00054095563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005025755,0.00018665881,0.00032311102,0.0011986461,0.0012358892,0.003321247,0.0005859648,0.00051871495,0.0032372307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032713418,0.00015935286,0.00021381435,0.0023257711,0.00061057956,0.0006738109,0.00054932915,0.0011313586,0.00019571482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033353703,0.0002513735,0.9554886,0.00007865715,0.00017476299,0.00089650374,0.0008830543,0.007183828,0.0021387062,0.0043677334,0.005709913,0.022493213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014708722,0.000050175255,0.9883984,0.00002672708,0.000053144075,0.00004232092,0.0020645962,0.0045269886,0.0004760321,0.00030592483,0.0040149125,0.000026141237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9741207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98562104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025879323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023011874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012763819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16696364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7155159179","doi":"10.1108/j.jfe.2001.07.005","title":"Canadian Newsprint in the United States: a Multivariate Cointegration Analysis","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Economics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Newsprint; Cointegration; Multivariate statistics; Multivariate analysis; Ordinary least squares","score_opus":0.056711090112070955,"score_gpt":0.235446462952729,"score_spread":0.17873537284065805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7155159179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95705867,0.0021812485,0.0035542136,0.0013701132,0.000056538334,0.00007118361,0.007948669,0.00013352658,0.027625713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98663867,0.0013967358,0.0017241382,0.000071511706,0.000026907166,0.000019829375,0.004597239,0.00001992558,0.0055050454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963546,0.0000270981,0.000014764657,0.000061026807,0.0001878267,0.000073784155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897134,0.00015659814,0.0001642448,0.000041111198,0.0005645864,0.00010213881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044572863,0.0003002108,0.00037558234,0.0027643365,0.001051945,0.0014274659,0.00039322153,0.000267908,0.005519839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030500598,0.00016768376,0.00042884,0.005862956,0.00035065998,0.000612566,0.0004382066,0.00059476047,0.00035330182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042645162,0.00020739043,0.7381348,0.00023089653,0.0004900505,0.00089640304,0.0018997297,0.030616812,0.0015732798,0.030017555,0.028293537,0.1672131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002835903,0.000041187293,0.92777187,0.000054261556,0.00017735825,0.00009020891,0.0012385004,0.04455564,0.00051229016,0.0016003093,0.023870567,0.000059396752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9702517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9726316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02974832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009625049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00970321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06983495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}