{"meta":{"query_hash":"5f6c5ece212b","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Forest Planning"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5f6c5ece212b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Forest+Planning"},"results":[{"id":"W2263262012","doi":"10.20659/jfp.16.special_issue_133","title":"Multi-scale Forest Inventory and Modelling for Multi-purpose Management(<Special Issue>Multipurpose Forest Management)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"Forest Biomass Utilization and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable forest management; Environmental resource management; Negotiation; Business; Deforestation (computer science); Forest management; Scale (ratio); Environmental economics; Sustainable management; Forest inventory; Certified wood; Environmental science; Sustainability; Economics; Computer science; Agroforestry; Geography","score_opus":0.05156424951867485,"score_gpt":0.25358143262082944,"score_spread":0.20201718310215458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263262012","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017103458,0.0025456494,0.93773943,0.0016812313,0.0013010711,0.00033502083,0.011350997,0.0035830627,0.024360111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3415812,0.0045699766,0.60587186,0.0005852608,0.00082118646,0.0012099756,0.017633706,0.0020092523,0.025717547],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996068,0.00011648363,0.00003818195,0.00007780402,0.00011676669,0.000044025473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990896,0.0003214721,0.000119995384,0.00018661105,0.00019715505,0.00008520161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015873943,0.000695954,0.00079939427,0.0008788497,0.00056865695,0.0024898837,0.001824818,0.0019444849,0.01310667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021728706,0.00083753,0.0018894549,0.0017285552,0.00036897496,0.0022472942,0.0013334799,0.0015435492,0.0037610428],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042325773,0.00006504057,0.0053033987,0.0002625736,0.00012723035,0.00017601663,0.00007791659,0.82300586,0.0012047129,0.022801122,0.044772346,0.102161475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006778115,0.000007858141,0.001554578,0.000047203597,0.000016653607,0.000045523324,0.000017551942,0.9621586,0.00019230483,0.009835866,0.02609573,0.000021291757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01716052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017755667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01716052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009792144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015789083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04384619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033130012","doi":"10.20659/jfp.20.1_27","title":"A stakeholder-driven approach to building an effective protected area network in Quebec, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Stakeholder; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Marine protected area; Business; Protected area; Environmental protection; Habitat; Political science; Ecology; Biodiversity; Economics","score_opus":0.043468008758381915,"score_gpt":0.2217471571412337,"score_spread":0.17827914838285178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033130012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115336634,0.005251681,0.082984775,0.11558769,0.00063722755,0.0042068413,0.0016968865,0.0004980257,0.67380023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8392401,0.0021403383,0.07505052,0.0051651783,0.000038726517,0.0009969391,0.00086298544,0.00009257948,0.07641274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99213517,0.0035091834,0.00015642509,0.0006273118,0.0014039015,0.002168009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892075,0.0014228097,0.00032841862,0.00028553838,0.004801644,0.003954021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009631737,0.0007529782,0.00041635317,0.003219456,0.020583412,0.009159412,0.0043448545,0.0024105485,0.010612818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008839778,0.00046660716,0.00059081934,0.004203186,0.0065820445,0.003399716,0.0062088813,0.0023061342,0.000616884],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012754094,0.0005022465,0.04182134,0.000772373,0.00015188764,0.0037843194,0.04562829,0.024396196,0.0020912304,0.49360862,0.17171004,0.21540597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011728055,0.000192382,0.039734684,0.0017244082,0.000108128224,0.0005103757,0.13061194,0.027571378,0.0008325979,0.06627766,0.7321174,0.00020170346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9869543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99512166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17868848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17868848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27688748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95260495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035473234","doi":"10.20659/jfp.22.2_29","title":"Does Resilience of the Forest Bring Prosperity to Local Regions?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Forest management; Certified wood; Prosperity; Sustainable forest management; Geography; Environmental resource management; Business; Forestry; Agroforestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03229503691478282,"score_gpt":0.2993542299100053,"score_spread":0.2670591929952225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035473234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8009045,0.012506949,0.0020550466,0.059062432,0.00022228743,0.000026608242,0.000449458,0.00003779775,0.124734975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962364,0.0021340412,0.00016075395,0.00028869827,0.00004565593,0.0000037209747,0.000042309966,0.000005919051,0.0010826368],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959224,0.0001099803,0.000014040043,0.000075688695,0.00004065706,0.00016735915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889356,0.00018434186,0.00032331876,0.00009147882,0.00016773588,0.0003396255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076965964,0.00015210306,0.00027653045,0.000995101,0.0015472803,0.0025781204,0.00046905965,0.0005792522,0.0043617957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017795397,0.00011448109,0.00021357149,0.0011825839,0.006184816,0.005091983,0.0017592184,0.00068588345,0.00033432862],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023680412,0.00011331028,0.3824086,0.0012917962,0.00031511928,0.002518752,0.04871018,0.0024730568,0.0024216042,0.31522587,0.016889362,0.22739561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068421905,0.00014458397,0.7038725,0.00055993703,0.00010225014,0.00077375286,0.12508076,0.00076562655,0.0005311408,0.07614973,0.091932416,0.000080469035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015677962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042606365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015677962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019652029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012540801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031173408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W642687252","doi":"10.20659/jfp.16.special_issue_121","title":"Developing Forest Models from Longitudinal Data : A Case Study Assessing the Need to Account for Correlated and/or Heterogeneous Error Structures under a Nonlinear Mixed Model Framework(<Special Issue>Multipurpose Forest Management)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Mixed model; Nonlinear system; Econometrics; Errors-in-variables models; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Standard error; Applied mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.11852028074174967,"score_gpt":0.3399769579182816,"score_spread":0.22145667717653192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W642687252","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3110131,0.0004683708,0.6854254,0.0008345627,0.000041763804,0.00022787602,0.00039932088,0.00028997072,0.0012996404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6113812,0.00026794,0.38642815,0.000109504406,0.000037425543,0.00032977428,0.00050377887,0.000073968644,0.000868237],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99217117,0.006832534,0.00016290908,0.00040472235,0.00029531875,0.00013329771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9387911,0.05560417,0.0017062488,0.0017238503,0.0018866227,0.0002880667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029587373,0.0008445237,0.00079839246,0.00086636684,0.00063720404,0.0014826603,0.0014929596,0.001194973,0.0010608016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054202765,0.00056303607,0.0012554533,0.0012986438,0.0006669562,0.0021975278,0.0015967527,0.0016351832,0.00023356325],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036084923,0.00038369655,0.06520237,0.00025456847,0.00032379816,0.0005357032,0.0009056815,0.82983696,0.00086125726,0.017494196,0.0011148542,0.08272609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021283788,0.0001498365,0.0036558043,0.000038437254,0.0000419742,0.00006950523,0.0001918896,0.9833082,0.0005963629,0.011022667,0.00086847704,0.0000354998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014551147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022977969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029587373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013261075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001814531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15647483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9941716","doi":"10.20659/jfp.13.special_issue_279","title":"Stability of Surface LiDAR Height Estimates on a Point and Polygon Basis(<Special Issue>Silvilaser)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Lidar; Polygon (computer graphics); Remote sensing; Environmental science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Tree canopy; Forest inventory; Ranging; Canopy; Mathematics; Geography; Geodesy; Computer science; Forest management; Geometry","score_opus":0.015883501761991204,"score_gpt":0.24101877354176257,"score_spread":0.22513527177977136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9941716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9758178,0.0001895061,0.01781541,0.00006248496,0.00002672779,0.000041959305,0.0026846647,0.00025636557,0.0031049491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870386,0.00005179542,0.009737344,0.000018254002,0.000012910285,0.000018979152,0.0024976789,0.00005768655,0.0005666304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980677,0.00034096834,0.00019603406,0.00044866523,0.0008521384,0.000094455754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899921,0.0032688042,0.0017173883,0.0011870373,0.0037150164,0.00011960638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034800277,0.00015024457,0.0002900237,0.0016475447,0.00026971177,0.0011131734,0.0004419437,0.00021359063,0.0010416161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0118947625,0.00014752022,0.00022661644,0.0018254537,0.00031932868,0.00071214733,0.0007135053,0.000290769,0.00055450713],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030577113,0.000026083111,0.87229174,0.000051411782,0.00018545054,0.00009610822,0.00045541063,0.010248386,0.007271153,0.0003884073,0.0017436983,0.10693635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009835288,0.00010071998,0.9534851,0.0000237015,0.000040457115,0.0001979733,0.00052004866,0.03889103,0.0042487844,0.0002731716,0.0021775381,0.00003157818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016191754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023377059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016191754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049635186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048117503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03219503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}