{"meta":{"query_hash":"5f6c5ece212b","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Forest Planning"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5f6c5ece212b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Forest+Planning"},"results":[{"id":"W2263262012","doi":"10.20659/jfp.16.special_issue_133","title":"Multi-scale Forest Inventory and Modelling for Multi-purpose Management(<Special Issue>Multipurpose Forest Management)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"Forest Biomass Utilization and Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainable forest management; Environmental resource management; Negotiation; Business; Deforestation (computer science); Forest management; Scale (ratio); Environmental economics; Sustainable management; Forest inventory; Certified wood; Environmental science; Sustainability; Economics; Computer science; Agroforestry; Geography","score_opus":0.05156424951867485,"score_gpt":0.25358143262082944,"score_spread":0.20201718310215458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2263262012","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.120500594,0.001309034,0.85731107,0.000030236632,0.0019800784,0.0016129238,0.000028935536,0.00024762953,0.01697949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4936294,0.0010810288,0.50032413,0.00015000666,0.0013625466,0.00012101784,0.000061001134,0.00021398702,0.003056866],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770826,0.000029334684,0.0009292935,0.0003313941,0.00038209645,0.00061964564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989017,0.000031359134,0.00033876766,0.0002904585,0.00013255916,0.0003051529],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047375393,0.0004336113,0.00047236882,0.00075583305,0.00020886138,0.00012688254,0.00046466241,0.00015599024,0.00004759367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011790403,0.00042670206,0.00022603694,0.0002584717,0.00010103326,0.0006278399,0.00016683975,0.00023813697,0.000016447122],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008676869,0.00081537245,0.15670076,0.003214393,0.00171066,0.001013595,0.006211406,0.75149894,0.00013357181,0.007828976,0.049051598,0.020953054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005980766,0.00023139364,0.039877895,0.000626579,0.00039378487,0.00005728506,0.0012911826,0.8031334,0.00006842566,0.0007949172,0.14687185,0.0006724935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005240919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022127687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3731288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011854454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010253044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033130012","doi":"10.20659/jfp.20.1_27","title":"A stakeholder-driven approach to building an effective protected area network in Quebec, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Stakeholder; Convention on Biological Diversity; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Geography; Marine protected area; Business; Protected area; Environmental protection; Habitat; Political science; Ecology; Biodiversity; Economics","score_opus":0.043468008758381915,"score_gpt":0.2217471571412337,"score_spread":0.17827914838285178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033130012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950645,0.000025023322,0.002863162,0.00018824948,0.000103739854,0.0003343731,0.0000011946679,0.000006887662,0.0014129011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556375,3.590204e-7,0.0040421113,0.0001685621,0.00008811999,0.000005308325,0.0000024721885,0.000005476077,0.0001238543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892396,0.00008562851,0.00021231797,0.00014016204,0.0004052382,0.00023272386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994613,0.00003216011,0.00017153272,0.00009382878,0.000025364443,0.00021580115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004580358,0.0000996579,0.00015785558,0.00007680165,0.00009591135,0.00004815062,0.000244547,0.000034232537,0.000009792772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006485411,0.00008411028,0.000024017083,0.00031859896,0.000026110023,0.0001962056,0.0001286825,0.00017869205,0.0000015701256],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004723087,0.0000256957,0.5320142,0.0000033137098,0.000008627793,0.000049553164,0.0012622975,0.46306127,0.000024020044,0.0000012470371,0.002999927,0.00050263025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004818727,0.00011493212,0.98134995,0.00007546585,0.000012506591,0.000011983264,0.0016061751,0.008403213,0.00000767703,0.000035733006,0.0077855443,0.00011496027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3948077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.705738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45465806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072730216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070456794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60922235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035473234","doi":"10.20659/jfp.22.2_29","title":"Does Resilience of the Forest Bring Prosperity to Local Regions?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"French Urban and Social Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Forest management; Certified wood; Prosperity; Sustainable forest management; Geography; Environmental resource management; Business; Forestry; Agroforestry; Ecology; Environmental science; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03229503691478282,"score_gpt":0.2993542299100053,"score_spread":0.2670591929952225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035473234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97596484,0.00051040476,0.0014222339,0.0019053458,0.0013671204,0.00016949225,0.0000014169316,0.000008255472,0.01865087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980594,0.000021638578,0.0003238145,0.000106398766,0.00095410575,0.000001314198,4.5226795e-8,0.0000041976373,0.0005291209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868184,0.00009128875,0.00029207935,0.00008668442,0.0006128719,0.00023526036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989935,0.000110208355,0.00029502492,0.00010138471,0.0003973723,0.00010248363],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010115032,0.00006993836,0.00018290002,0.000050629384,0.000640888,0.00004268591,0.00041367862,0.000052303323,0.000014685201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009358623,0.00003690433,0.00010184265,0.00030967497,0.0008614084,0.00017152524,0.00008201965,0.00016292138,0.0000024587464],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053605163,0.000039165683,0.91501725,0.0000121142975,0.000035809197,0.000010818732,0.048732307,0.0007949099,0.00006309131,0.018541759,0.014603289,0.0020958735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026502638,0.00023462133,0.88524586,0.00055143615,0.00003500986,0.000006493498,0.014607802,0.00009561453,0.00031312948,0.012557239,0.085948646,0.00013910438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015305689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012840181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07134536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016036748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019453451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7165122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W642687252","doi":"10.20659/jfp.16.special_issue_121","title":"Developing Forest Models from Longitudinal Data : A Case Study Assessing the Need to Account for Correlated and/or Heterogeneous Error Structures under a Nonlinear Mixed Model Framework(<Special Issue>Multipurpose Forest Management)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Alberta Environment and Protected Areas","funders":"","keywords":"Heteroscedasticity; Mixed model; Nonlinear system; Econometrics; Errors-in-variables models; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematics; Standard error; Applied mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.11852028074174967,"score_gpt":0.3399769579182816,"score_spread":0.22145667717653192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W642687252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6972815,0.000045117828,0.30092084,0.00015767217,0.00043146702,0.0009882944,0.000037777034,0.000020611667,0.00011674098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8321305,0.000009574583,0.16695392,0.0003714934,0.000372333,0.00003810514,0.000024389175,0.0000430794,0.000056606812],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974088,0.000090014364,0.0008323477,0.000594729,0.0004851919,0.00058890437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982202,0.0003111443,0.00058481016,0.00061431306,0.000054334512,0.00021518026],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081684196,0.00039760154,0.00047794348,0.00018786994,0.0007144073,0.00023937592,0.0010991702,0.00017871932,0.00010092141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010348126,0.0002744909,0.00009392186,0.00025639468,0.00016890946,0.0010640799,0.0013471566,0.00044683172,0.000006963158],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009128324,0.0002536178,0.08744221,0.000024968296,0.00049972546,0.0037105773,0.004657437,0.8976553,0.0000031056309,0.0008540567,0.0026694555,0.0013167155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021500208,0.00060436944,0.11636912,0.00020201645,0.0006619949,0.0012501859,0.008483709,0.8271973,0.000004871876,0.041958068,0.00060870004,0.0005096055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031397064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009004084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13484903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021636632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005885813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9941716","doi":"10.20659/jfp.13.special_issue_279","title":"Stability of Surface LiDAR Height Estimates on a Point and Polygon Basis(<Special Issue>Silvilaser)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forest Planning","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; University of British Columbia; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Lidar; Polygon (computer graphics); Remote sensing; Environmental science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Tree canopy; Forest inventory; Ranging; Canopy; Mathematics; Geography; Geodesy; Computer science; Forest management; Geometry","score_opus":0.015883501761991204,"score_gpt":0.24101877354176257,"score_spread":0.22513527177977136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9941716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9866828,0.00009250962,0.00021997905,0.0003934291,0.00008065526,0.00007435266,0.00000651785,0.000008648557,0.012441156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907364,0.000031657884,0.008869605,0.000039764578,0.00024771361,1.226194e-7,0.0000015865779,0.000009719526,0.00006340721],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989047,0.000037364753,0.00038634,0.00015132164,0.0003466979,0.0001735951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991922,0.00017480527,0.00031537213,0.00016007078,0.000024970213,0.00013258468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032876234,0.0001212131,0.00024263425,0.00004185163,0.0001671011,0.000018023515,0.00012806694,0.000055593577,0.0002256559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006801919,0.000097356395,0.00007212257,0.00013244068,0.00022427784,0.00015827043,0.000046749654,0.00019048124,0.00001888648],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047023236,0.00041817053,0.8921992,0.000036102883,0.00007063286,0.00017305971,0.0064072367,0.026285298,0.04729403,0.000091928545,0.021732667,0.004821433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007822557,0.0006876046,0.93097454,0.00020693449,0.000058074675,0.0006880725,0.0003614688,0.003137809,0.0415385,0.0007292389,0.020569788,0.00026568398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005866484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015922353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038775362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006933666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002091013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39700785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}