{"meta":{"query_hash":"71e59951ab89","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Gender and Power"},"cohort_total":2,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":2,"exported":2,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/71e59951ab89","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Gender+and+Power"},"results":[{"id":"W3162587100","doi":"10.2478/jgp-2020-0020","title":"Book-Review: Susan W. Woolley, Lee Airton (eds.). <i>Teaching about Gender Diversity. Teacher-Tested Lesson Plans for K-12 classrooms</i>. Toronto 2020: Canadian Scholars. Pp. 334","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gender and Power","topic":"Gender Roles and Identity Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Library science; Sociology; Political science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Anthropology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03489194800459236,"score_gpt":0.296179901735627,"score_spread":0.26128795373103464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162587100","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006142313,0.9747527,0.000117257456,0.008309825,0.011495935,0.000045259447,0.00037946424,0.000033567634,0.00480464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070025754,0.97054815,0.0002604005,0.006161399,0.0045165913,0.00008295158,0.00067569944,0.000027321728,0.017027266],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988537,0.00014954494,0.00012724583,0.00012043648,0.0006627283,0.00008632173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940065,0.001960135,0.00059494836,0.00009493725,0.0029565787,0.000386876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014212305,0.0019339914,0.0031732137,0.006105311,0.0008523807,0.0029185947,0.0035616322,0.002820638,0.05028293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008474707,0.00081954076,0.0012170647,0.009854149,0.0008783052,0.003488982,0.0015750509,0.0038972194,0.038377684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025222555,0.000008464021,0.00007611273,0.006924723,0.00003322247,0.00006037987,0.00005360212,0.000043368967,0.000045292913,0.00029937833,0.87593037,0.11649997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021596528,0.000015997879,0.00047189108,0.009483824,0.00006709983,0.00046340004,0.00010054823,0.000023169008,0.00004451176,0.00029420404,0.98899287,0.00002082765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021702839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041837104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05028293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00278409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061310334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16821313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164837103","doi":"10.14746/jpg.2023.20.2.12","title":"Women Political Participations: A Study of Nasarawa State from 1999 to 2022","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gender and Power","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; State (computer science); Commission; Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Legislature; Women's history; Local government","score_opus":0.08273434206153826,"score_gpt":0.3838946364929557,"score_spread":0.30116029443141745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164837103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99795663,0.000092265254,0.000015025248,0.00029596064,0.000008967931,0.000014749311,0.00010461516,0.000001050234,0.0015106902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950707,0.00039597083,0.00004504303,0.00044528564,0.00002446762,0.00006898853,0.00019258146,0.0000036322224,0.0037534018],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993969,0.00016087099,0.000029646055,0.000058356032,0.00010971966,0.000244427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904186,0.00017444894,0.00024332237,0.000023584073,0.00018727209,0.00032958676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009893926,0.00027742487,0.0003478689,0.0017043469,0.0048273318,0.0017725796,0.00055575295,0.0008614775,0.002779073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015436058,0.0004942719,0.0002497849,0.0016884956,0.0009059297,0.0014647236,0.001361647,0.0013389201,0.0007839593],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009877424,0.000436176,0.42519242,0.00009010014,0.000015548494,0.0011508964,0.55819756,0.000016938586,0.0012696454,0.00031240183,0.0016197623,0.011599851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029172922,0.00020659473,0.4749213,0.00004886778,0.000007751607,0.00032109916,0.51688164,0.00003032418,0.0001452848,0.000035590125,0.007386214,0.0000123733025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058484122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14677994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058484122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015824218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015414188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11628747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}