{"meta":{"query_hash":"d8be955e750c","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d8be955e750c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Global+Security+Studies"},"results":[{"id":"W2796917461","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogx028","title":"The Effectiveness of Rocket Attacks and Defenses in Israel","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Nuclear Issues and Defense","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Rocket (weapon); Pillar; Aeronautics; Software deployment; Engineering; Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution; Computer security; Aerospace engineering; Computer science; Structural engineering; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.03127377991785271,"score_gpt":0.39459715641686965,"score_spread":0.3633233764990169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796917461","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913673,0.00036635296,0.00006163186,0.00029139454,0.0000054799443,0.0000041135913,0.0002838634,0.000003136405,0.0076168478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923754,0.00014253969,0.0000128336,0.000020932452,0.000011028713,0.0000019500765,0.00023392194,0.0000012316067,0.0003379706],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897337,0.00032192952,0.000063483094,0.00008989802,0.00025009378,0.00030122077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994948,0.001773875,0.0024018479,0.00008746878,0.0003356819,0.00045320965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009907967,0.0001505179,0.00025724643,0.0013196686,0.00033137243,0.0014718033,0.00037068367,0.00044889608,0.0030430746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045994315,0.00011877755,0.00021046022,0.0012702177,0.00081022247,0.00095438614,0.0008494079,0.00066937314,0.00034251885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001814888,0.00010317465,0.98389614,0.000028167377,0.00008392337,0.00016429706,0.0009241935,0.0013266682,0.00018430078,0.0015692675,0.00066573545,0.010872638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005446631,0.000078338984,0.9945549,0.00001956016,0.0000102817785,0.00009930685,0.0030042562,0.00063572027,0.00011305077,0.0003140533,0.0011575653,0.0000074943982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009139328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013134208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009139328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001330996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005435173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018172264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2889649532","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogy022","title":"Rethinking Secrecy in Cyberspace: The Politics of Voluntary Attribution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales; St. Francis Xavier University","keywords":"Cyberspace; Secrecy; Political science; Anonymity; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Politics; Public relations; Sociology; Political economy; Law; The Internet","score_opus":0.038440900769631026,"score_gpt":0.35812322085815823,"score_spread":0.3196823200885272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2889649532","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4472406,0.0027868277,0.11456573,0.055770915,0.00061440235,0.00009828642,0.00008361626,0.00016225119,0.37867734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971648,0.00020964401,0.0007027145,0.00028877283,0.000056322016,0.000009588189,0.000007037329,0.000023339406,0.0015376834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749035,0.018053055,0.00071668724,0.0016132793,0.0031646525,0.0015488922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93929046,0.04484344,0.0053746756,0.0072774654,0.0020541192,0.0011597613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021044875,0.00041794064,0.0003980857,0.0021840327,0.009051756,0.014210638,0.001191465,0.0037565648,0.004426182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05082767,0.00046647506,0.00053895585,0.0021710724,0.0645634,0.01956219,0.011382499,0.006609097,0.00048476591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001900366,0.000011614068,0.0031235702,0.000034873767,0.000009357386,0.00026376938,0.0678099,0.00037430707,0.00039943508,0.9181044,0.0007917928,0.009057917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016216707,0.000035298202,0.002789832,0.000312288,0.000024904146,0.00051497604,0.06383209,0.0022636247,0.0012759522,0.86549395,0.06337838,0.00006249198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025973802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020871607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021044875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041974992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040242095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11129731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898475156","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogy027","title":"Causal Claims and the Study of Ethnic Conflict","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Reflexivity; Scholarship; Epistemology; Pluralism (philosophy); Causality (physics); Ethnic conflict; Conflict resolution; Ethnic group; Narrative; Conflict resolution research; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Social science; Psychology; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07165365769882137,"score_gpt":0.43045991662689687,"score_spread":0.3588062589280755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898475156","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14160527,0.103822745,0.25192976,0.25989458,0.0029344454,0.0007367162,0.0004793904,0.00015758658,0.23843952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688196,0.008916213,0.017344253,0.002493191,0.0005970286,0.00045956508,0.00006735295,0.000032031283,0.0012707788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90825385,0.08310617,0.0016816169,0.0024729061,0.0032372863,0.0012482601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73900914,0.24110778,0.0097407475,0.0066848635,0.0023886121,0.0010688333],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.073120885,0.00086498685,0.0015096291,0.0072596255,0.008807994,0.012669398,0.0034389226,0.004546852,0.0046302103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11353097,0.0007190847,0.0010112046,0.00817743,0.07237344,0.019442342,0.009100349,0.0063431635,0.0003153939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008398592,0.000015413383,0.0013318416,0.00020644642,0.000023946572,0.00008934396,0.023048146,0.00034168136,0.000021020514,0.97062105,0.00039104736,0.0039017645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010821752,0.000015492946,0.00079090166,0.00063278404,0.00001515355,0.000089681984,0.020063814,0.00054501137,0.00006245753,0.96734667,0.010416079,0.000011166538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037328515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024987177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9268791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007957469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071670664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3867048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915905661","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogy045","title":"Norm Robustness and the Responsibility to Protect","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Responsibility to protect; Norm (philosophy); Robustness (evolution); Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Law; Sociology; Chemistry; International law","score_opus":0.02351158611909721,"score_gpt":0.3682402234841248,"score_spread":0.34472863736502757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915905661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023846239,0.014906413,0.011287336,0.28644976,0.10771614,0.000047267364,0.002123032,0.00019686087,0.5534269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6871826,0.010961484,0.00320463,0.0108707175,0.022069877,0.000082354076,0.001434778,0.00030861463,0.26388496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976421,0.0009801679,0.00021364125,0.00029169148,0.00067688455,0.00019547285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797039,0.010392212,0.0012818077,0.0021860208,0.005567967,0.0008681006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052692858,0.00026867003,0.00046390406,0.0014034376,0.0014881507,0.006142445,0.00053270714,0.0025080054,0.0381738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050697517,0.00017598353,0.00024624224,0.0010553161,0.003792486,0.00320947,0.0012320827,0.0024129818,0.0065228078],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013143086,0.000026061025,0.000846072,0.0001921996,0.000030199966,0.00015901923,0.0009686494,0.0007388531,0.00015964542,0.7103254,0.24086748,0.045554895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031417752,0.000040719136,0.0030783617,0.0006421274,0.00003748326,0.000147725,0.0011273863,0.0015668854,0.0005609322,0.44355118,0.5491549,0.000060863153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022192188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017450865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0381738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016935912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022156022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12770408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2929148112","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogy047","title":"Population-Centric Counterinsurgency in the Age of Salafi-Driven Insurgencies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Insurgency; Political science; Doctrine; Population; Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Boko haram; Ideology; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Caliphate; Adversary; Criminology; Sociology; Law; Politics; Computer security; Medicine","score_opus":0.043647801450880534,"score_gpt":0.37923488331199673,"score_spread":0.3355870818611162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2929148112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70710003,0.0023656653,0.0023992346,0.041995168,0.00043730618,0.000027308384,0.00003741616,0.000018190403,0.24561961],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99711204,0.00017622585,0.000094812916,0.0005608257,0.000055575485,0.00000491018,0.0000033033364,0.0000024446313,0.0019898287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915934,0.00036443846,0.00001900315,0.00010255385,0.00006987306,0.00028467548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987043,0.00046877426,0.00033924507,0.00009431962,0.00013605074,0.0002573584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026711037,0.00020743265,0.00019701458,0.0010087009,0.0070798807,0.00473819,0.0004679142,0.001841679,0.0047906158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029541533,0.00014249135,0.00010539559,0.0003887157,0.013920969,0.0036419046,0.0044241,0.0031425925,0.00031601574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006192051,0.000051135383,0.011019755,0.000050112205,0.0000069244556,0.00085061946,0.08687496,0.0001898452,0.000671822,0.8821941,0.0037171375,0.014311749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035527064,0.00021548098,0.043581113,0.00047898732,0.000020103327,0.0012903338,0.22977887,0.0013891644,0.001268775,0.3938745,0.32800648,0.00006079306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037009532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006776879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070798807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036778187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002084975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026684523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944317359","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogz015","title":"The Efficacy of Ethnic Stacking: Military Defection during Uprisings in Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; John Abbott College","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnic group; Stacking; Independence (probability theory); Political science; Trustworthiness; Loyalty; Development economics; Political economy; Demographic economics; Sociology; Social psychology; Psychology; Law; Economics; Physics","score_opus":0.03681524624933467,"score_gpt":0.358048145025625,"score_spread":0.3212328987762903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944317359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988576,0.000076638826,0.00004279696,0.00007679254,0.0000026068299,0.0000020962632,0.00002275024,6.2755674e-7,0.0009181197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99987996,0.000027923232,0.000013594738,0.0000029181067,0.0000027774065,7.017443e-7,0.000010518783,2.4595747e-7,0.00006139295],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990559,0.00049661094,0.00005076525,0.00006423721,0.00009554636,0.00023700106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847755,0.004285936,0.008839576,0.0006130991,0.00045815896,0.0010277734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014274169,0.0001641745,0.00018671488,0.00093319593,0.00074009714,0.0008549058,0.00033433276,0.00037301675,0.0028830625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009207429,0.00010134058,0.00012690888,0.0007179121,0.0010242468,0.000682445,0.0011690218,0.0006131454,0.00017827828],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000156983,0.00006917633,0.98394436,0.000026209736,0.00004098092,0.00015528999,0.0027276033,0.00023699026,0.00039222572,0.0005418428,0.00022684963,0.011481476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022821246,0.000074736454,0.99267274,0.000025491216,0.000011597966,0.000094854455,0.006034116,0.0003381403,0.0001348484,0.00024177298,0.00036419314,0.000005233359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032323264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006210379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0032323264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048107386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026892632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009644866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2960434209","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogz028","title":"The Securitization Dilemma","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Dilemma; Security dilemma; Argument (complex analysis); Law and economics; Context (archaeology); Political science; Unintended consequences; Epistemology; Positive economics; Politics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022110902502223768,"score_gpt":0.36276192797196155,"score_spread":0.3406510254697378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2960434209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115521066,0.008454318,0.07784395,0.3270305,0.0019358385,0.0001818246,0.00006234516,0.00009146856,0.46887863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98067194,0.0010169069,0.0038332052,0.006131678,0.00047783073,0.00015560069,0.000017410726,0.000031808493,0.007663659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664756,0.02521908,0.00094118115,0.0023937556,0.003839054,0.0011314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97711617,0.015607577,0.0017730995,0.0028086917,0.0018047908,0.00088970695],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027994277,0.0007038004,0.0007319123,0.0013610901,0.006510981,0.010204021,0.0017531451,0.007878317,0.004101152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030788438,0.00048894907,0.0006921976,0.0008637341,0.10803424,0.020243207,0.013115376,0.011469436,0.0005923496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043887662,0.0000038255885,0.00008815469,0.000013419077,0.0000014988468,0.00005590461,0.0043762224,0.00006190354,0.000037573227,0.99363434,0.0006033712,0.0011193677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007109856,0.0000135827795,0.000057593435,0.00011561096,0.000002023306,0.00014964923,0.0048050955,0.00035200958,0.00012408203,0.9684324,0.025933027,0.000007749323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00080484716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052623474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027994277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006432916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055288374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14804965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991205156","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogz048","title":"NATO's About-Face: Adaptation to Gender Mainstreaming in an Alliance Setting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"North Atlantic Treaty Organization","keywords":"Gender mainstreaming; Mainstreaming; Political science; Adaptation (eye); Public administration; Face (sociological concept); Alliance; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Gender equality; Psychology; Social science","score_opus":0.05028020753387295,"score_gpt":0.36806388116077937,"score_spread":0.3177836736269064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991205156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9567987,0.000086883025,0.0017500502,0.002375602,0.0000826515,0.000062832456,0.000035784124,0.000018572227,0.03878897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99774134,0.00003900721,0.00047206518,0.00036889836,0.000015071254,0.000044082117,0.000013609746,0.000009670157,0.0012963414],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98851436,0.008556635,0.00019432383,0.00046154961,0.0009794936,0.0012937045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880046,0.0057521947,0.0016236273,0.0014841283,0.0010747083,0.0020607181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016631644,0.00020205295,0.00020239904,0.0010866371,0.0089235,0.0056906617,0.0010305322,0.00090202206,0.006522595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021517191,0.0001896344,0.00018407975,0.0013167716,0.007434218,0.0044909935,0.00783473,0.0017395521,0.00047148098],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009918443,0.00029613063,0.06123968,0.00008453972,0.000010237656,0.00055771985,0.83575225,0.0001095974,0.0010333156,0.041588753,0.0044767535,0.05475179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012016213,0.00013107315,0.04045412,0.00014722763,0.0000068015447,0.00019034218,0.8895368,0.00033928684,0.00051407784,0.009312015,0.059329893,0.000026413885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050476715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012654077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016631644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035037647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030307742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08795762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008304214","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogz065","title":"Social Practices of Rule-Making for International Law in the Cyber Domain","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd; University of Oklahoma; University of Toronto; Eli Lilly and Company","keywords":"State (computer science); Political science; Domain (mathematical analysis); Rule of law; International law; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Politics","score_opus":0.0437551986687498,"score_gpt":0.4137727902828782,"score_spread":0.3700175916141284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008304214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6390493,0.0007706449,0.052938223,0.02144157,0.0001558748,0.00019131905,0.000039257076,0.000085339394,0.28532848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976688,0.00004644185,0.0015417037,0.00015117179,0.000011706938,0.0000202633,0.000003830466,0.000008129353,0.0005479951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9517934,0.038230993,0.0013061067,0.0028538224,0.00374973,0.002066021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9256211,0.055153813,0.0065605002,0.008298424,0.0029700298,0.0013961052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044886343,0.00033023016,0.00044190875,0.002990347,0.012579901,0.014147106,0.0015217534,0.0031044038,0.002274142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04003028,0.00038614694,0.00044558186,0.0022397554,0.09649449,0.0071593747,0.007330047,0.004957115,0.00023704533],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001277873,0.00005812431,0.003183814,0.000027593504,0.000012846803,0.00021932185,0.122543655,0.00072841294,0.00041657654,0.8644532,0.00057599926,0.0077677076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000360863,0.00007513568,0.0051375893,0.00025763942,0.00002174966,0.00024532902,0.11684952,0.003689506,0.0012168672,0.8037264,0.06866345,0.00008064288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046271305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004381629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044886343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006840904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008172717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2373845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3036749309","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogaa027","title":"International Politics in the Age of Existential Threats","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Existentialism; Politics; Political science; Ideology; International security; Argument (complex analysis); Context (archaeology); International relations; Materialism; Political economy; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.059994840380432325,"score_gpt":0.3548975952901889,"score_spread":0.29490275490975654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3036749309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042873926,0.01234968,0.006810398,0.1094998,0.0014736549,0.000017676439,0.00004571982,0.00005127311,0.82687783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698649,0.0040556043,0.000773435,0.0060461676,0.001157511,0.00003243767,0.00002236617,0.000041213472,0.018006327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958637,0.0027112453,0.000067191046,0.0003647803,0.00052717206,0.00046591816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963987,0.0021230862,0.00036031022,0.0004045469,0.0003010849,0.00041233827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003892476,0.00032680694,0.00027535867,0.0011768843,0.006459366,0.011041096,0.00056360685,0.0038733222,0.0064433934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051511372,0.00022868693,0.00028615916,0.0011328441,0.031230023,0.008755546,0.0063342345,0.0067356043,0.0005282278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029701998,0.0000037415484,0.000108345914,0.000009375006,9.827044e-7,0.000038311882,0.004812025,0.000066764114,0.000028069457,0.99073046,0.002639098,0.0015598612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053909193,0.000014975689,0.00046052175,0.00017786253,0.000003585586,0.00014591124,0.011766672,0.00025063983,0.00009624115,0.59596837,0.3910993,0.000010457408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011785704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010351441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011041096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004809472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019297309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0348953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3088683451","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogaa043","title":"The Gray Area of Institutional Change: How the Security Council Transforms Its Practices on the Fly","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Corporate governance; Politics; Political science; Charter; Casual; Gray (unit); Public relations; Interdependence; Public administration; Management; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.2543423410713169,"score_gpt":0.38617119559259633,"score_spread":0.1318288545212794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3088683451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49696186,0.0011819635,0.03539653,0.063212305,0.00051316427,0.00017130363,0.000039769988,0.00037328675,0.40214983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99385756,0.00010200336,0.0015408837,0.00058616145,0.000021155318,0.000022518474,0.000006451799,0.000043954013,0.003819376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97770077,0.016868055,0.00036367576,0.0013527345,0.0016876284,0.0020271365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98357576,0.009011632,0.0010416233,0.0036097078,0.0012329798,0.0015282095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023963463,0.00028089678,0.00035218504,0.002098751,0.013559879,0.017451191,0.0019358487,0.0031297884,0.006026797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026019387,0.00032745535,0.00041862985,0.0020641612,0.07126708,0.01031709,0.014140509,0.004885169,0.0006505033],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003338643,0.00005217053,0.0020249009,0.00004090884,0.000011459689,0.00031390166,0.18824933,0.001098412,0.00029032983,0.77842194,0.0037078587,0.025755398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003923188,0.0001501454,0.0044249073,0.0004757661,0.000027142494,0.00019528158,0.2791372,0.0037462823,0.0009866614,0.39214906,0.31859154,0.00007682621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010664468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010629434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023963463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015468236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013333471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12673241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123860332","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogy039","title":"Norm Robustness and Contestation in International Law: Self-Defense against Nonstate Actors","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Norm (philosophy); International law; Political science; Law; Robustness (evolution); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.047649267520144215,"score_gpt":0.30820506996886937,"score_spread":0.26055580244872517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123860332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2157769,0.002435143,0.18706858,0.04632162,0.00039267962,0.00014032786,0.00006794708,0.00017290158,0.5476239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924926,0.00016441615,0.0049209315,0.0005326766,0.000055420507,0.00004911273,0.000011432634,0.00002105189,0.0017524004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9755397,0.017050892,0.0008282104,0.0017896255,0.0034832696,0.0013083587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9687611,0.0199417,0.0030915807,0.0054439874,0.001943846,0.000817856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026006375,0.00035729358,0.0006047218,0.002449001,0.0066304985,0.010912811,0.0015767976,0.004948554,0.0027825758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036909,0.00031406106,0.00078039017,0.0017529356,0.08684431,0.013945045,0.007829009,0.006197928,0.00021845211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043730743,0.000006136464,0.00027465698,0.0000075567377,0.0000026084995,0.000037859187,0.0053750514,0.00023651139,0.000066915505,0.99227273,0.00017029933,0.0015453066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001088672,0.000018847628,0.00077175035,0.00007113251,0.000006818949,0.00007754465,0.0037981777,0.0013928777,0.0003595972,0.9797611,0.0137079945,0.00002325783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004070602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002522271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026006375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005471298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040382715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13753647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124905859","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogaa048","title":"The Long Jihad: The Boom–Bust Cycle behind Jihadist Durability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Bust; Boom; Power (physics); State (computer science); Political economy; Insurgency; Monopoly; Political science; Development economics; Economics; Engineering; Law; Market economy; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.03775324162713216,"score_gpt":0.3659017816625557,"score_spread":0.32814854003542354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124905859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80025053,0.004450141,0.004412224,0.02225927,0.00016387111,0.00002578582,0.00006779949,0.00002693667,0.1683434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829847,0.00028886995,0.00008879878,0.00014740616,0.000022904784,0.0000023103464,0.0000047468843,0.00000391218,0.0011426618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992982,0.0002681664,0.000020291904,0.00009591028,0.0001250764,0.00019236273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996714,0.0014101668,0.00079266384,0.0003085181,0.00036241492,0.0004123425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025026356,0.00019247399,0.00024671695,0.0008550529,0.0036993935,0.005173076,0.00055227434,0.0014345906,0.0067613046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049671093,0.00020757571,0.00013537407,0.00068923377,0.017205762,0.0034629924,0.0027374614,0.0020764442,0.00034783344],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021875366,0.00013705582,0.050428826,0.00016610346,0.000040412408,0.000721831,0.073647745,0.0017011509,0.0012301398,0.814476,0.005483935,0.051748063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044036078,0.00020351826,0.16660477,0.0005994941,0.00003662269,0.00059459085,0.12572023,0.003912825,0.0010780217,0.56947273,0.13163586,0.000097222895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004586071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069174687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0067613046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041182325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015121772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029880047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200237503","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogab025","title":"Internal Migration and Resource Conflict: Evidence from Riau, Indonesia","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Resource (disambiguation); Internal conflict; Externality; Internal migration; Population; Development economics; Multinational corporation; Subsistence agriculture; Ethnography; Political science; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Geography; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.02393248907497431,"score_gpt":0.27249601865167516,"score_spread":0.24856352957670086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200237503","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942781,0.00046598335,0.00008286486,0.00024457937,0.000010109381,0.000019178398,0.00010581439,0.0000010170947,0.0047923625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99846196,0.0006967735,0.00012336143,0.00012664314,0.000008800548,0.00003271522,0.000095757394,0.0000023861724,0.00045152858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991301,0.00048114033,0.00006631576,0.00008784321,0.00007827033,0.00015632172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973476,0.0012244235,0.00075150776,0.00015303624,0.0002496994,0.00027376294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013787249,0.00027619264,0.00037518723,0.0010771399,0.0023868256,0.0019546575,0.0007265928,0.00043756608,0.0030266289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025698852,0.0003140461,0.0002179501,0.002336325,0.0021794538,0.0011227106,0.002509375,0.0010967478,0.0003407919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113951464,0.0005535869,0.7914453,0.0006136944,0.00007767237,0.0029509107,0.17608412,0.00011351512,0.00035588804,0.0019347563,0.0014691231,0.024287513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073540637,0.000077129596,0.5674141,0.00051718624,0.000041697716,0.0006082177,0.42706832,0.0001604093,0.00017627513,0.00034216835,0.0035718675,0.000015305275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026946729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05225011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026946729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010710908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015495915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053579748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200665806","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogab024","title":"Compromising Aid to Protect International Staff: The Politics of Humanitarian Threat Perception after the Arab Uprisings","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Fulbright Canada","keywords":"Perception; Politics; Political science; Humanitarian aid; International relations; International community; Public relations; Law; Psychology","score_opus":0.035239187622801926,"score_gpt":0.3649431952024736,"score_spread":0.32970400757967167,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200665806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9782088,0.00023810413,0.00031702212,0.004923282,0.00005447433,0.0000098138125,0.000012779183,0.0000054192683,0.01623031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993211,0.00005602764,0.00002808839,0.0001358536,0.000010256151,0.0000026088826,0.0000028731965,0.0000015904675,0.00044162574],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569005,0.0028443162,0.00006869385,0.0002232856,0.00037915804,0.0007945152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990553,0.005473765,0.001797791,0.00024669076,0.0008311589,0.001097551],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056865728,0.00019876708,0.00017225723,0.0013434809,0.0066127735,0.007081104,0.0005770032,0.0011217501,0.003586292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0101246275,0.00020018003,0.00013413998,0.0008071432,0.0142501965,0.002836364,0.0038814794,0.0025343276,0.00028756083],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092752234,0.00008394831,0.048566207,0.00005205748,0.00001100422,0.00046325108,0.91808665,0.00009448541,0.000817196,0.018789131,0.0019968378,0.010946564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002536262,0.000035994835,0.023572726,0.000043037355,0.0000021574833,0.00005278274,0.9708502,0.00006690888,0.00011231489,0.0013132569,0.003939887,0.000008182158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00852371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008995986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00852371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031205453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018760399,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030073822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220980600","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogac003","title":"Changing Norms in Practice: Noninterference in the UN and ASEAN","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Peacebuilding and International Security","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Scholarship; CONTEST; Political science; Corporate governance; Sociology; Law; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.02746195796284344,"score_gpt":0.38661865466551787,"score_spread":0.3591566967026744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220980600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8990418,0.00085762324,0.002780324,0.0079159895,0.000070784285,0.000025838053,0.000020079699,0.000016797869,0.08927093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745744,0.0002573756,0.00054309925,0.00026372942,0.000009796279,0.000013518131,0.0000083979785,0.000004209428,0.0014424705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859907,0.010878195,0.0003251044,0.0005739881,0.0015509353,0.00068099104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9799693,0.012605964,0.002674359,0.0014855835,0.0019754157,0.0012893355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015152465,0.0002608511,0.00019012758,0.0014952304,0.009665285,0.0059480206,0.0011343305,0.0016914724,0.0027728544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01963737,0.00018893846,0.0001363952,0.002873148,0.018152365,0.007039782,0.0066688177,0.0034678322,0.00015366112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007449941,0.00022661842,0.032398187,0.00010925543,0.000016779537,0.0023756586,0.7399852,0.0007445037,0.00090495724,0.16566059,0.0027788596,0.05472488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009138262,0.00012360312,0.03847955,0.0003744335,0.000010536085,0.00072430726,0.8348697,0.001805,0.00094353035,0.032826163,0.08976627,0.00006773654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030736934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05505189,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030736934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007541396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005153056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08013487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313425451","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogac029","title":"A Winning Team of Losers: The Logic of Jihadist Coalitions in Civil Wars","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ideology; Political science; Politics; Government (linguistics); Political economy; Opposition (politics); State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04964488686287458,"score_gpt":0.3838022769362572,"score_spread":0.3341573900733826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313425451","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34976807,0.0007288907,0.08803297,0.02950824,0.0005787483,0.00025574834,0.00007471311,0.000085789725,0.5309668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880695,0.00007535546,0.003973746,0.0006481181,0.00008699214,0.00006213054,0.00001545565,0.000024517098,0.0070440834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926603,0.004121189,0.0001857916,0.0010587975,0.0008020026,0.0011719194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915427,0.0029438748,0.0014737099,0.00085748394,0.0013275235,0.0018546681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010097058,0.0003815286,0.00047696417,0.002820918,0.013459966,0.009235587,0.0017559896,0.0037162085,0.0122309765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014960354,0.00045381451,0.00055008655,0.0012065236,0.029681206,0.0058472436,0.008481838,0.004020946,0.0013415323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043472075,0.000041260835,0.0030639605,0.00002554344,0.000017037017,0.00030809318,0.010784786,0.0005009593,0.00013437483,0.9786267,0.0022003658,0.00425336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006949949,0.000073348296,0.0028194648,0.00011096703,0.000034941073,0.00037578848,0.022408402,0.0062917694,0.00024504965,0.9345601,0.03296584,0.000044873315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031778037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043599945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013459966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00378371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020992944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053398967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322095713","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogac044","title":"“As Inscrutable as the Sphinx, but Far More Dangerous”: Trends in Democratic–Personalist Conflict","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Social and Intergroup Psychology","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Cosmos Club Foundation; Georgetown University","keywords":"Autocracy; Democracy; Political economy; Political science; Liberal democracy; Foreign policy; Positive economics; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04998288994460484,"score_gpt":0.40682935873228604,"score_spread":0.3568464687876812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322095713","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98852485,0.00027583688,0.0001668534,0.002908718,0.00002518245,0.000005456229,0.00004514441,0.0000045319352,0.008043327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993117,0.000085130145,0.000030154913,0.00014507983,0.000015482947,0.0000028337417,0.000020060072,0.000002041566,0.00038757268],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918324,0.0003324999,0.000035333538,0.00012308717,0.00012573409,0.00020004205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960498,0.0014601653,0.0014753287,0.00018923669,0.00043645332,0.00038903073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017663336,0.00012211973,0.00016432813,0.0012343662,0.0022613443,0.0029209072,0.00036389698,0.0008290688,0.0049815224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056677903,0.0001221873,0.00010546537,0.0015260624,0.003724689,0.0022373376,0.001913723,0.0017555502,0.00032200274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066535943,0.00025659034,0.6441869,0.00019189433,0.00007064894,0.00042983072,0.24222946,0.00030898387,0.002491038,0.03557872,0.0075491513,0.066041395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014099276,0.00009000585,0.7433863,0.00009119135,0.000010563304,0.00024523356,0.23290704,0.0004479316,0.0005238637,0.0056468095,0.016612463,0.000024477316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004790384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006720503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049815224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009835163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052913034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016664863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396940279","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogae011","title":"Deterrence and Foreign Election Intervention: Securing Democracy through Punishment, Denial, and Delegitimization","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Deterrence (psychology); Denial; Criminology; Punishment (psychology); Political science; Intervention (counseling); Democracy; Somali; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics; Psychiatry; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022609522226215775,"score_gpt":0.3588821065034653,"score_spread":0.33627258427724954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396940279","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4277428,0.0017991661,0.10186765,0.02919975,0.000311738,0.00023379683,0.000049524413,0.00011631765,0.43867925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957396,0.00014145374,0.0013122349,0.00034885787,0.000020393587,0.000026585012,0.0000034805166,0.000005544659,0.0024018863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99219185,0.0052286624,0.0002357915,0.00060297665,0.00079078355,0.00094989507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851682,0.0074480823,0.0037357241,0.0016607075,0.0012528722,0.00073441997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075427094,0.00028553454,0.00038817248,0.00072517607,0.0028998554,0.0045902696,0.00095938856,0.00182674,0.0050218883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020153565,0.0001854318,0.00040842762,0.00044358135,0.0135892555,0.0026832996,0.005125859,0.00338489,0.00035594744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005135263,0.00008953043,0.005086212,0.00009790158,0.000017080878,0.00012233111,0.0045658476,0.0020366258,0.00038037568,0.97128975,0.00090280274,0.015360143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006881364,0.00035616258,0.0154036945,0.0007071893,0.00008662988,0.00044865243,0.01572601,0.017339999,0.0031825616,0.8672446,0.07935151,0.000084156956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024728077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004164051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0075427094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032242753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035532028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03989017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399154611","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogae014","title":"Taking to Kill: The Lethality of Hostage-Taking in Civil War","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Institute of International Studies, University of California Berkeley; Institute for Humane Studies, George Mason University; Mitacs; University College London","keywords":"Punitive damages; Receipt; Criminology; Spanish Civil War; Political science; Lethality; Corporate governance; Action (physics); State (computer science); Population; Law; Sociology; Business; Biology","score_opus":0.050113785694800114,"score_gpt":0.4197182684551641,"score_spread":0.36960448276036395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399154611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99055696,0.00017244852,0.0003124075,0.001234004,0.00001831067,0.000012422511,0.00021151011,0.0000029302855,0.007478962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959594,0.000056242654,0.000035463443,0.000036736546,0.000010651276,0.0000046850887,0.000058698566,0.0000013506213,0.00020035842],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981359,0.0009776475,0.0001074773,0.00016409867,0.0002610836,0.00035382362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794408,0.008435873,0.008664509,0.0008150264,0.0014693522,0.0011743383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020993443,0.00019806481,0.0002457783,0.0019469674,0.0015749285,0.0026780255,0.00062717195,0.00079906336,0.0064342846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018244274,0.00015726221,0.00017378922,0.0015497722,0.0037782807,0.0023389873,0.0028890907,0.0026543483,0.0005485156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012339592,0.00016531485,0.9602574,0.000042904667,0.000039064515,0.00036958387,0.020266354,0.0005931664,0.0001241335,0.0063147573,0.0019112381,0.009792602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046137397,0.0001283475,0.89989287,0.00011532854,0.000017791057,0.00030123277,0.0904294,0.0010185215,0.00016960154,0.0054614055,0.0024316772,0.00002905957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009684845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011714718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009684845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014912211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006306118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021524847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399378173","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogae019","title":"The Liminal Figure of the Civilian and the Necropolitics of Protection","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Liminality; Political science; Law; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.017792396874102615,"score_gpt":0.3268560921612576,"score_spread":0.309063695287155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399378173","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15683419,0.0060739582,0.030700197,0.033010114,0.00039010312,0.00003380019,0.00005044082,0.00004188368,0.7728653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917768,0.00080364983,0.0009873809,0.0005055174,0.00007143621,0.000012272756,0.000011241008,0.0000102726535,0.0058213538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971583,0.002073446,0.00005041553,0.0002571887,0.00026341586,0.00019723387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613404,0.0021801773,0.000504224,0.00045989393,0.00037684766,0.0003449428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031219725,0.00025971874,0.00022429657,0.0013230048,0.004045992,0.0072076446,0.0006238317,0.0015448176,0.0058060763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004167485,0.00014032175,0.00014232895,0.0009744197,0.073566824,0.0055090934,0.004996798,0.0029374731,0.00041232596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031526758,0.000003731836,0.00018112274,0.000009680402,7.2197304e-7,0.000025786481,0.005499225,0.00008810993,0.000035014004,0.99209243,0.0003986312,0.0016623818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006258236,0.000023005963,0.001289197,0.00022234154,0.0000033520005,0.00013617387,0.019933762,0.0005394471,0.000231069,0.86121005,0.116396636,0.000008700582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018728032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022400985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072076446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004332687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023043642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031436026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403622481","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogae038","title":"The Securitization of Transborder Ethnic Kinship: Contextual Explorations around the World","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Kinship; Ethnic group; Political science; Business; Law; Financial system","score_opus":0.05600311076961337,"score_gpt":0.400043887064114,"score_spread":0.3440407762945006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403622481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97805256,0.0006287874,0.00035308898,0.0016141713,0.000020668465,0.000013335672,0.00003213,0.000002288562,0.019282997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926025,0.00026172138,0.00005781696,0.000057421596,0.0000030771594,0.0000044470867,0.000011906675,0.0000026676248,0.0003407252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851376,0.001067433,0.00003932509,0.00009460347,0.000075335825,0.00020957914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783105,0.0012112708,0.0003608275,0.0001738294,0.00019203524,0.00023111091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019561965,0.00016728451,0.00025651415,0.0014177893,0.00638201,0.0053302054,0.0006129208,0.0007205537,0.0037418725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005305988,0.00018159393,0.000092469614,0.0026063256,0.009408767,0.0042110747,0.005077579,0.0010393502,0.00010537901],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007479162,0.00006843095,0.079068705,0.00012233306,0.000014120314,0.00089973706,0.8623172,0.00013734052,0.00048244564,0.034099042,0.0006970245,0.022018794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013814243,0.000014434198,0.03743549,0.0000902257,0.0000050448407,0.000100857076,0.95441604,0.000055776545,0.000076253134,0.002222616,0.0055768415,0.000004982782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018410245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050908647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018410245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022729014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027139168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036606133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403851423","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogae035","title":"Kin-State Intervention and the Securitization-Minority Policy Nexus: Hungarians and Russian-Speakers in Central and Eastern Europe","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Horizon 2020 Framework Programme","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Securitization; Political science; State (computer science); Intervention (counseling); Business; Financial system; Psychology","score_opus":0.011315410393159591,"score_gpt":0.3177344213457435,"score_spread":0.3064190109525839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403851423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989594,0.000088301465,0.000023642431,0.00006282147,0.0000014954294,0.000001740794,0.0000051685024,3.743186e-7,0.00085697597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998367,0.000034527733,0.000010535688,0.000014947606,8.877189e-7,0.0000011686128,0.0000056393683,2.2036104e-7,0.0000954047],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994912,0.0002000606,0.00002139963,0.000065993496,0.00002893777,0.00019228835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993143,0.000243772,0.00022944486,0.000028367953,0.0000412562,0.00014292062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012205493,0.00010997615,0.00023881547,0.0004125096,0.0010673226,0.001940085,0.00034074887,0.00044241597,0.0019046802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009741589,0.00009080292,0.00018915674,0.00046788072,0.0019061265,0.00077520893,0.0023591614,0.00051536097,0.00007256354],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037478926,0.0002863132,0.90737957,0.00012719838,0.00015847798,0.0010031909,0.056871366,0.0009296076,0.0020227893,0.011389024,0.00041918323,0.019038545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002486388,0.00011252412,0.90395766,0.000091336486,0.00005186577,0.00008073371,0.09046565,0.00054626673,0.0004301868,0.001298409,0.0029294647,0.0000110558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01512699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032430787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01512699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010662306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009929532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030077934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7105844646","doi":"10.1093/jogss/ogaf031","title":"Unipolarity, Grand Strategy, and the Economics Security Trade-Off","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Global Security Studies","topic":"Defense, Military, and Policy Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Rivalry; Incentive; Typology; Face (sociological concept); Politics; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.027042367529448483,"score_gpt":0.2786388439127673,"score_spread":0.2515964763833188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7105844646","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3000866,0.002037833,0.049793698,0.018891925,0.00009635304,0.000039102382,0.000099495264,0.00003758765,0.6289174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960692,0.00018284381,0.00079948624,0.00017461811,0.000020123669,0.000008416167,0.0000053825465,0.0000032253404,0.0027368777],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924576,0.00037658014,0.000017084678,0.00008809838,0.000108998625,0.0001635979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986609,0.0007556926,0.00019907768,0.00009762331,0.00011125736,0.00017533328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013454631,0.00019815094,0.0002963027,0.0004897222,0.001321785,0.0036950398,0.0004088505,0.0016086678,0.007081557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031166656,0.00014779477,0.00020546874,0.00049849146,0.0048593353,0.0022492902,0.0013696378,0.0014209381,0.00029008588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008105316,0.000005297125,0.0003201265,0.0000049105565,0.0000028104662,0.0000226705,0.000070966795,0.00086495874,0.000071463066,0.99674916,0.00045114988,0.0014282706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006339191,0.000013778096,0.0010235229,0.000018668343,0.0000032173775,0.000032850752,0.0002631633,0.0040110014,0.00011288835,0.98929846,0.005209024,0.000006995603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019518881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002039409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007081557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023019777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009030285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023690224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}