{"meta":{"query_hash":"12d7f158716f","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Healthcare Risk Management"},"cohort_total":9,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":9,"exported":9,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/12d7f158716f","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Healthcare+Risk+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W2037010329","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.5600250303","title":"Embracing, not resisting, change to survive: What I learned from frogs in Texas: Saving your skin with forward‐thinking innovation. Jim Carroll. Publisher: Oblio Press, Ontario, Canada; 121 pages; $18.66","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Healthcare Risk Management","topic":"Health Sciences Research and Education","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Officer; Compliance (psychology); Citation; Management; Chief executive officer; Psychology; Library science; Art history; Law; History; Media studies; Medicine; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.15784678916257777,"score_gpt":0.40235727817838474,"score_spread":0.24451048901580696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037010329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.115388155,0.06609924,0.003163357,0.7688664,0.00635687,0.00008044734,0.00005513537,0.00013158224,0.03985874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6862487,0.08654515,0.012814899,0.1252175,0.0012138321,0.00023872498,0.00008513453,0.00016938924,0.08746671],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775785,0.0014269644,0.000049437684,0.00017925022,0.00020128711,0.00038523687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958973,0.0016140621,0.0002465123,0.00018146676,0.0003678596,0.0016928224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006590249,0.0006324204,0.0005809064,0.00042078135,0.009934279,0.0074945567,0.0018701704,0.004793697,0.0077010533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00809481,0.00040881598,0.0005140003,0.00044948337,0.019172449,0.012171959,0.00622651,0.012039932,0.0010270738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000149272,0.00036418627,0.005607476,0.00071492285,0.000041489544,0.0018830444,0.5395176,0.00029167932,0.0011562773,0.031604096,0.21032137,0.20834862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025023928,0.00028365632,0.0036803673,0.002091422,0.000035848952,0.0010528914,0.49653587,0.000104972365,0.00045769985,0.0162671,0.47940084,0.00006429512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018339444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054557487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018339444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004729776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013754909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036465406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2082259750","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.5600260204","title":"The history and science behind the improvement movement. The quality solution: The stakeholder's guide to improving healthcare. Edited by David B. Nash and Neil I. Goldfarb. Publisher: Jones and Bartlett Publishers: Sudbury, MA; 196 pages: $49.95","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Healthcare Risk Management","topic":"Healthcare Quality and Management","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporation; Citation; Associate editor; Health care; Quality (philosophy); Library science; Stakeholder; Management; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.0560618725579481,"score_gpt":0.3575109370164456,"score_spread":0.3014490644584975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2082259750","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017346148,0.3862226,0.014094193,0.5049508,0.009197876,0.00006891282,0.00020498715,0.00020192021,0.08332405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12224238,0.5399757,0.037533045,0.13870373,0.0090644155,0.0005602799,0.0004955485,0.0005149769,0.15090993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913543,0.0045067267,0.0003879408,0.00035609293,0.0029883403,0.00040647513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98969567,0.0064146766,0.00063815527,0.00026945747,0.002274286,0.0007076992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008011532,0.0009687846,0.0006703448,0.0025058815,0.0021626595,0.0074390755,0.0010346043,0.0039520026,0.009241946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011404225,0.00062241347,0.00044125482,0.0029860013,0.010260619,0.009731292,0.0029841992,0.006044656,0.0030871667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033446075,0.00003904195,0.00057351316,0.000937493,0.000016994658,0.0001515674,0.0040231976,0.00029320008,0.0004890449,0.19456083,0.5570231,0.24185862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009029029,0.000039740575,0.00086815713,0.0014422976,0.000009986658,0.0001880741,0.0033593928,0.00023559987,0.00029892594,0.09899198,0.8945299,0.000026954775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014136342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023162272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014136342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006049532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015832294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043892622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116258259","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.20048","title":"A customizable plan for effective claims management","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Healthcare Risk Management","topic":"Healthcare Policy and Management","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies","funders":"","keywords":"Risk management; Business; Key (lock); Plan (archaeology); Risk management plan; Process management; Risk analysis (engineering); Health care; Knowledge management; IT risk management; Computer science; Computer security; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.023575159033298095,"score_gpt":0.28241953657265784,"score_spread":0.25884437753935974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116258259","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010307697,0.00017857706,0.9041962,0.0032047287,0.0003627155,0.006399834,0.0012704906,0.023717487,0.050362326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07671336,0.00022323728,0.89953625,0.00044201722,0.0002437263,0.0022894864,0.0025191726,0.0012359684,0.016796863],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99311674,0.0021943524,0.0008608049,0.00079740316,0.002553321,0.0004774275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9863187,0.004359333,0.0014988253,0.0037068943,0.0031829812,0.00093332236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012765983,0.0011685231,0.0005631515,0.0033465154,0.0019788512,0.00570772,0.002042514,0.0019694983,0.035317678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028233282,0.00084645685,0.0009614525,0.0019144324,0.0008482812,0.004760958,0.0029896463,0.002529975,0.015422293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043059874,0.0011768586,0.009450028,0.0002520442,0.0000714256,0.0013304948,0.0017982983,0.06587668,0.0116514955,0.09995591,0.16696051,0.6410457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047172335,0.0007343444,0.0095387045,0.00046676546,0.00010594272,0.0011381421,0.0018305376,0.35798034,0.014307092,0.1417045,0.47127804,0.00044383036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024653887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00295327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035317678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019076521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058209444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11814946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117987958","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.5600250204","title":"Essential reading on disclosing medical harm. Medical errors and medical narcissism.John Banja, Publisher: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc., Sudbury, MA; 229 pages; $49.95","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Healthcare Risk Management","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Citation; Reading (process); Medical library; Library science; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13326156526011176,"score_gpt":0.47574632503929437,"score_spread":0.3424847597791826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117987958","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035320537,0.6786571,0.0013646849,0.12359319,0.09969105,0.00016447347,0.00049091893,0.00024838804,0.09543691],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010066891,0.6118032,0.0032048777,0.06380429,0.10773635,0.00036103732,0.0010630833,0.0001877825,0.2017725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979426,0.00068693,0.00022714655,0.000091782684,0.00093878235,0.000112773356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98690134,0.008868813,0.00071142043,0.00025737894,0.00258981,0.000671286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022661767,0.0026175305,0.0021009662,0.004988074,0.0015976377,0.0031935726,0.0023321807,0.0064616622,0.05326358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013512469,0.0007288088,0.00085633754,0.002301508,0.0028553826,0.004245756,0.0017101387,0.0038050944,0.023748582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012494384,0.00001592471,0.000045963985,0.00041105677,0.0000035064716,0.00014663518,0.00016941901,0.000020919986,0.00007028578,0.0013067052,0.9605701,0.03722685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016738162,0.00004552561,0.0016737572,0.0044719847,0.000015913312,0.0018023603,0.0007112936,0.00007618363,0.00015862517,0.008093052,0.9829117,0.000022923477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062140734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01142235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05326358,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016390269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003127693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17818439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885705977","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.21348","title":"Using medicolegal data to support safe medical care: A contributing factor coding framework","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Healthcare Risk Management","topic":"Patient Safety and Medication Errors","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Medical Protective Association","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive reframing; Coding (social sciences); Patient safety; Health care; Knowledge management; Risk analysis (engineering); Process management; Medicine; Nursing; Psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.2424346927891098,"score_gpt":0.531776867723277,"score_spread":0.28934217493416725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885705977","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021260295,0.00033894714,0.95396346,0.010602312,0.0001614928,0.0027348532,0.00046423494,0.00044323428,0.010031296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117409855,0.00023496366,0.87954235,0.00035798518,0.000039531562,0.0013585018,0.00047733056,0.000046414876,0.0005329282],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94057727,0.040147826,0.00624907,0.0028662083,0.008963908,0.0011956762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87374824,0.07343939,0.012612993,0.009621207,0.027865518,0.00271257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07171896,0.0015118965,0.0006775238,0.015742613,0.004716162,0.00653021,0.003917245,0.0021422307,0.0016260265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1170147,0.0007263778,0.0015328228,0.0066057765,0.011995613,0.009321538,0.007264858,0.0029756764,0.00044065627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001214319,0.00035472764,0.049346495,0.0014811975,0.00014880914,0.00090814085,0.06742629,0.011073527,0.0023248538,0.62124777,0.010515608,0.23505116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012039009,0.00023858118,0.020015594,0.0068348725,0.00022296545,0.0013597661,0.062341314,0.10804258,0.005209641,0.66469574,0.13054141,0.00037706908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016902223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018158011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07171896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0107011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03500934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37929064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3017100509","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.21405","title":"Implementation of risk assessment tools in psychiatric services","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Healthcare Risk Management","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Risk management; Discretion; Variety (cybernetics); Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management tools; Scale (ratio); Mental health; Medicine; Psychology; Psychiatry; Computer science; Business; Computer security","score_opus":0.06702012899509095,"score_gpt":0.5015681081318555,"score_spread":0.4345479791367645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3017100509","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30110428,0.018195437,0.34240457,0.14774333,0.0038271968,0.032276366,0.0016037711,0.008410725,0.1444343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40552396,0.006251232,0.570291,0.0065983455,0.00043283877,0.006440091,0.0008160627,0.0004364854,0.0032099932],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8303512,0.0992849,0.031193977,0.003372168,0.03223238,0.003565391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5967044,0.23318781,0.038072873,0.025949894,0.09656572,0.009519281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1707356,0.00086527783,0.0012908722,0.0069778273,0.003771905,0.006091554,0.004033064,0.0018485043,0.004066776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41213167,0.00092066923,0.0019410418,0.0045384015,0.0033944305,0.008910904,0.010223843,0.005190225,0.0015600645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000963857,0.0007664433,0.030957207,0.0026186712,0.00008160108,0.00044852935,0.017835418,0.0009808847,0.0005742041,0.0044363607,0.02212015,0.9190842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076302415,0.00545515,0.26511,0.055276975,0.0007008396,0.0070766434,0.1087081,0.028173074,0.010724248,0.110439934,0.40554205,0.0020300348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005969868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010835347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1707356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009676685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03637636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90294695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388946720","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.21562","title":"Medico‐legal cases associated with older physicians’ cognitive ability to practice medicine","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Healthcare Risk Management","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Public Health; Canadian Medical Protective Association; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cognition; Medicine; Family medicine; Psychology; Gerontology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.061220544870737977,"score_gpt":0.4723870073922598,"score_spread":0.41116646252152184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388946720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897858,0.0032675045,0.00032369618,0.0007931749,0.000028051358,0.00033705254,0.001672234,0.0000134487445,0.0037789627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961832,0.001726696,0.0005949697,0.0002631151,0.0000648779,0.00011328459,0.0007038778,0.0000027050846,0.0003473716],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99248004,0.0017474944,0.0017909424,0.000640975,0.0026613702,0.0006793001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9217487,0.024593666,0.046808857,0.0010963079,0.004177665,0.0015748496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005129013,0.00026346857,0.00028875424,0.007967156,0.0014793215,0.0013405464,0.0009241786,0.0009461089,0.0035899011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042432077,0.00034505167,0.00048060226,0.0061754617,0.0009850933,0.0010898827,0.0017955755,0.0005012849,0.00024219335],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003956152,0.000037885693,0.99160296,0.00022760419,0.000030490151,0.00096472946,0.0015093174,0.000033347584,0.00006725157,0.00011133802,0.0004880812,0.004887447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046137875,0.000056137582,0.9907802,0.00040287696,0.000040946135,0.0037447603,0.0033966154,0.00017810582,0.00014825277,0.00011813453,0.0011204904,0.000008851576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033819135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04548985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033819135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027127839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002964211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06724459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396664456","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.21567","title":"Exploring the dynamics of physician‐patient relationships: Factors affecting patient satisfaction and complaints","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Healthcare Risk Management","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; University of Toronto; Canadian Medical Protective Association","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Thematic analysis; Psychological intervention; Interpersonal communication; Psychology; Interpersonal relationship; Quality (philosophy); Qualitative research; Medicine; Nursing; Family medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13976110312351664,"score_gpt":0.4030449808170577,"score_spread":0.26328387769354106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396664456","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85164094,0.12205821,0.003915219,0.010195392,0.00014295525,0.00012645414,0.00026354523,0.00003018564,0.011627042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687362,0.028321842,0.0015480217,0.00085711107,0.00008067566,0.00006355265,0.00009106805,0.0000050931335,0.00029643008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98860127,0.00753847,0.0014132004,0.0002616844,0.0018433628,0.00034201928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9245959,0.062477417,0.008500507,0.00038342254,0.0034016296,0.00064110965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010619344,0.00015756002,0.00053261523,0.0022366256,0.0009931887,0.0024761292,0.00040519563,0.00085221295,0.0017491675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04320809,0.0001872901,0.0007402456,0.0035558175,0.0010965765,0.0020092775,0.0010528875,0.00074453396,0.000134601],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003185022,0.00023353398,0.41549042,0.01877301,0.00092239917,0.002471547,0.11428246,0.00040592282,0.0017883411,0.0043782173,0.0029209666,0.43801475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006807535,0.0018079957,0.5737711,0.010104541,0.0011128077,0.011400684,0.34580415,0.000792482,0.0016926174,0.0041877204,0.049097557,0.0001603173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009554233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018026729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010619344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093700655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029064945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056161106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412755582","doi":"10.1002/jhrm.70009","title":"Developing in situ large‐scale simulation strategies for enhanced patient safety","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Healthcare Risk Management","topic":"Patient Safety and Medication Errors","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Preparedness; Patient safety; Scale (ratio); Action plan; Health care; Test (biology); Medical emergency; Process management; Nursing; Operations management; Medicine; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.04879883833252263,"score_gpt":0.44371924381751643,"score_spread":0.3949204054849938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412755582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7940397,0.00015667576,0.18529642,0.0013201189,0.00012615981,0.0036846045,0.00025724331,0.000795776,0.014323305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87443745,0.00019029468,0.12256637,0.0001879995,0.000012735362,0.0016665199,0.00017700458,0.000029151704,0.00073253695],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99541616,0.0037495738,0.0001356794,0.00020108299,0.00025024396,0.00024727898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98921925,0.008143654,0.00064953964,0.00072808954,0.0006194975,0.0006400671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071307197,0.0009291078,0.00034144166,0.00048150416,0.0010284558,0.0017403713,0.002214547,0.0011982329,0.003688578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015419629,0.00047061263,0.0007544535,0.00031670008,0.0008496913,0.0019760018,0.0029562875,0.00093501253,0.00037715706],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026873068,0.020989284,0.0824698,0.0022428846,0.0005485988,0.0011829073,0.027326236,0.5883893,0.03999553,0.01798439,0.0057264892,0.21045735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027357412,0.028381893,0.02952811,0.0012884862,0.000600636,0.00080267346,0.037621137,0.7735446,0.05044776,0.026446354,0.048069023,0.00053355534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024609952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005134954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071307197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016970687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038408814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037711322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}