{"meta":{"query_hash":"09bb8716bae8","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Human Rights"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/09bb8716bae8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W2006963724","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2014.886951","title":"The Destruction of Identity: Cultural Genocide and Indigenous Peoples","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Indigenous; Human rights; Political science; International law; Criminology; Sociology; Tribe; Law; Cultural diversity; Ethnic group; Environmental ethics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.013104830016400624,"score_gpt":0.3136480317647338,"score_spread":0.3005432017483332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006963724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77842474,0.015604822,0.0012660377,0.050571535,0.00048783157,0.00004797885,0.000014636435,0.000010911326,0.15357144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911237,0.0036449507,0.00017430726,0.0015024515,0.000094017465,0.00001368372,0.0000036147317,0.0000037617422,0.0034394637],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967179,0.0017728189,0.00006124797,0.00017862539,0.00036511166,0.0009042997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852884,0.00062928535,0.00030687905,0.00009742375,0.00010766347,0.00032998915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038719482,0.0002777586,0.00041426203,0.0011158069,0.023744553,0.007068024,0.0013282734,0.0032408098,0.001673303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031069356,0.00021133575,0.00021487157,0.0012876979,0.062376343,0.0055092555,0.0111420695,0.0048558046,0.0000964614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055683427,0.000030311348,0.0030654192,0.00003959639,0.00000227702,0.00092221436,0.83106077,0.000041165207,0.00007222445,0.15806378,0.0007827784,0.005913908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002830633,0.000027737098,0.0039806166,0.0002318451,0.000005179465,0.0008494302,0.9437377,0.000070344686,0.000087689514,0.019577116,0.031415623,0.000013828091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12691587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16962269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12691587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008526955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009423764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25235426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033638760","doi":"10.1080/14754830902717734","title":"Technologies of Telling: Discourse, Transparency, and Erasure in Guatemalan Truth Commission Testimony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Transparency (behavior); State (computer science); State of exception; Sociology; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Erasure; Law; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Political science; Politics; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0327717221796118,"score_gpt":0.3650321356677401,"score_spread":0.3322604134881283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033638760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49442753,0.016057666,0.053122498,0.14094876,0.00087045913,0.00031789602,0.00024969605,0.0002936282,0.29371184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942629,0.00095229817,0.0018411948,0.00093092775,0.00006896916,0.000058418813,0.000015189545,0.000025342904,0.0018448568],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787582,0.018037701,0.0004486715,0.0005705124,0.0013206985,0.0008643154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95728457,0.034800746,0.0030104371,0.0025572102,0.0017551454,0.00059198285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017676022,0.0005998225,0.00043344943,0.0046510026,0.015076394,0.016089862,0.001563249,0.0049046515,0.0029498993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03595417,0.00047016717,0.00029380978,0.0038045717,0.0625553,0.012693477,0.009660946,0.003882429,0.0002733482],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023512559,0.000006590359,0.0005859237,0.000118230324,0.000004797319,0.00056645094,0.7448472,0.00014113297,0.00044339907,0.24420102,0.0009779724,0.008083882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000125892875,0.000050475195,0.001982409,0.0010380184,0.000027412361,0.0012292981,0.6914635,0.0011044638,0.0023628478,0.109014705,0.19165073,0.000063544045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013595841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009628717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017676022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011067535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00474295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093480885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035292434","doi":"10.1080/1475483042000210676","title":"Introduction: world civility?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"World Systems and Global Transformations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.017847915969647965,"score_gpt":0.3077817780499346,"score_spread":0.28993386208028665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035292434","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014437233,0.05547826,0.0029081372,0.56280077,0.14001809,0.000034862136,0.0008082062,0.00014738945,0.23636062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.074360885,0.051458266,0.0029464702,0.30400762,0.17041515,0.0002273049,0.001107172,0.0005611477,0.394916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989531,0.00044187062,0.000046516536,0.00020839673,0.00021811605,0.00013182532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827135,0.0008336657,0.00008530787,0.00013573909,0.00039768722,0.00027623097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016985033,0.0009986602,0.00086072553,0.001917481,0.0036562872,0.007105139,0.0010960277,0.006701365,0.05731041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003805447,0.00030430968,0.00057339226,0.0023512398,0.0064386483,0.009340249,0.0034060907,0.009320385,0.010361245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011163224,0.000012670452,0.00008493095,0.00016824687,0.0000029306505,0.000037965907,0.0011013589,0.00004102671,0.00005123915,0.28687364,0.69419396,0.01742089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033221784,0.000006756038,0.00019758259,0.00024385982,0.000002841829,0.000048233775,0.0009927145,0.000032138098,0.000026828173,0.03166812,0.9667705,0.000007135642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047069495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062621264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05731041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002518339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022462383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1917224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046376874","doi":"10.1080/14754830903530292","title":"International Organizations and Human Rights: Realizing, Resisting or Repackaging the Right to Water?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Mandate; Treaty; International human rights law; Political science; Right to development; Normative; International law; International community; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology","score_opus":0.018604656099342486,"score_gpt":0.3242230271407528,"score_spread":0.3056183710414103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046376874","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14978245,0.012899135,0.008766248,0.16895351,0.000964427,0.00007107293,0.0000294332,0.00002498759,0.6585088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98416996,0.0032636684,0.0007563615,0.0045470027,0.0002044421,0.0000393816,0.000011464329,0.000014850552,0.0069927927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854725,0.011154433,0.00022219442,0.0005915051,0.0011995618,0.0013598538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98841083,0.008668847,0.001210642,0.00054849964,0.00050760957,0.0006535217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011938965,0.00028717148,0.0002817508,0.001373331,0.005977927,0.013681877,0.0009743599,0.004261795,0.0047963117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013815802,0.00013592068,0.00029574163,0.0016580794,0.047242735,0.015874328,0.0076219672,0.0046332814,0.00027307993],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010726014,0.000025275038,0.0013172467,0.00006380176,0.0000025019333,0.000103155944,0.07173901,0.00008479333,0.00008177657,0.9118801,0.0024614418,0.012230128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012922882,0.000036970534,0.0028329862,0.0015057662,0.000011271559,0.00015418675,0.44475427,0.00039302325,0.0003159255,0.30754322,0.24241258,0.000026830105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005799199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058037317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013681877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059052547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056677684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063140035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050742697","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2010.501262","title":"Hannah Arendt's “Right to Have Rights”: A Philosophical Context for Human Security","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Popularity; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Human security; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03768449564788048,"score_gpt":0.363245206861581,"score_spread":0.32556071121370056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050742697","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020137655,0.011028677,0.014113391,0.52576876,0.0020895114,0.000053926655,0.0000348261,0.000025377925,0.42674792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8822747,0.0054399227,0.006303913,0.061329823,0.0012880779,0.00015579673,0.000022971912,0.000040734903,0.04314403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919734,0.005124451,0.00017844127,0.0006693307,0.0014422206,0.00061222573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954424,0.0032370086,0.00028490604,0.00024699117,0.00041782734,0.00037083207],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008507526,0.0003967998,0.00042788772,0.0012869616,0.009714814,0.0065233214,0.0011697175,0.010288025,0.0030346666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007475205,0.0003017586,0.00048228464,0.0009765648,0.056870297,0.010720285,0.0044459687,0.010729002,0.00038824056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019490747,0.000004061051,0.000029079638,0.00000708674,7.21481e-7,0.000018788103,0.002727306,0.000029678136,0.000020711663,0.9935696,0.002995007,0.0005959097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012915288,0.000014298469,0.00014988991,0.00014983975,0.000003634523,0.00010466876,0.0036035522,0.00027309466,0.00010692297,0.85590863,0.1396585,0.00001402749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007053011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006164742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010288025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005912061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052907616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044992626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052593205","doi":"10.1080/1475483042000185260","title":"Critiquing desire: philosophy, writing and terror","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Media studies; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07390199807158965,"score_gpt":0.2950460822075685,"score_spread":0.22114408413597886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052593205","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05954872,0.017855167,0.04145757,0.6310738,0.008098631,0.00011429535,0.000103292885,0.00019807558,0.24155046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470595,0.0028316604,0.0061425804,0.023914032,0.0022146425,0.0001474845,0.0000396494,0.00029555286,0.017354967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9667546,0.0282801,0.00078441575,0.0012094461,0.0020208945,0.0009506153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8656457,0.11878808,0.0031010662,0.0046539246,0.0055701807,0.0022410706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028328422,0.0006999906,0.00083871995,0.002357761,0.011824999,0.019267898,0.0021512297,0.00912133,0.0042658355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0794424,0.0004915248,0.0005061306,0.0017833088,0.09053311,0.017886845,0.007587475,0.016180092,0.00058733835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033673456,0.000025741678,0.00032436597,0.0002108175,0.000015229985,0.0001320137,0.21655954,0.00016234121,0.00015257426,0.7267041,0.042737965,0.012941637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026613094,0.00002289318,0.00036594665,0.0009599755,0.000011266028,0.0002794177,0.21925633,0.0006522628,0.0006161702,0.5532889,0.22447693,0.000043378546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022306046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028792995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028328422,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062095583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009181787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14981681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052758654","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2013.824283","title":"Beyond Repair?: Collective and Moral Reparations at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Tribunal; Crimes against humanity; Genocide; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; War crime; Politics; Criminal court; Criminology; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.02043590160680983,"score_gpt":0.2953473592035623,"score_spread":0.2749114575967525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052758654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6543961,0.0053183455,0.0039182194,0.09902657,0.0007031891,0.00014209763,0.000039838415,0.000047259953,0.23640838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797314,0.0003561093,0.00031339139,0.0045033563,0.0001146706,0.000033435175,0.0000062871377,0.000015161462,0.014926151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958835,0.0017130913,0.00010242801,0.00040271334,0.0003721037,0.001526109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975821,0.0012867281,0.00028894027,0.00030203443,0.00023657674,0.0003036315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005913633,0.00028529752,0.00034001793,0.0007485899,0.02169912,0.010879213,0.0016922986,0.011853612,0.004745781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00810405,0.00035963958,0.00028901617,0.0005530645,0.027022105,0.0071769976,0.0070524737,0.010433914,0.0003463974],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000476758,0.000042845022,0.0026337276,0.000087617576,0.000010250515,0.003380922,0.16062754,0.000374779,0.000741529,0.8079497,0.01069665,0.013406678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054809636,0.00025837356,0.015146508,0.0009937775,0.000055340963,0.002639616,0.39998686,0.0013718911,0.0035510857,0.19266771,0.38307723,0.00019674245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030952051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0637034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030952051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0085390005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00782301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061955094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058231418","doi":"10.1080/1475483042000210702","title":"Paying for the past?: the movement for reparations for African-Americans","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); Political science; Human rights; Human rights movement; Law; Criminology; Political economy; History; Sociology; International human rights law; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06109158947098327,"score_gpt":0.2829998804115254,"score_spread":0.22190829094054215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058231418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008377946,0.020353148,0.00028353295,0.92774826,0.0034930417,0.000022519287,0.000042175652,0.000020742356,0.039658565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34103167,0.040029325,0.0025767314,0.5001269,0.007508405,0.0003077094,0.00012883496,0.00017097102,0.108119436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443996,0.0024649266,0.00023398406,0.0003162334,0.0008692219,0.0016757494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925795,0.0028737097,0.0012082478,0.0003622269,0.00084096915,0.0021354356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011306689,0.00032838667,0.00030721366,0.0009995078,0.0137510225,0.008716545,0.002153864,0.01904215,0.009950436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016581915,0.00048057726,0.00037159742,0.0015244982,0.008718173,0.016293671,0.008555661,0.022140725,0.0020560876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059905175,0.00011159626,0.0013265744,0.00013272595,0.0000073827373,0.00042026996,0.029979082,0.0000469289,0.0003790018,0.24832462,0.65919214,0.060019866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032423075,0.000043319847,0.004576518,0.0007383815,0.00001299521,0.00031853517,0.03172003,0.00005088971,0.00027212856,0.01879848,0.943395,0.00004128948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017505726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048614636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01904215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004679539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014801773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059796214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060962179","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2014.923754","title":"Resisting LGBT Rights Where “We Have Won”: Canada and Great Britain","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Legislation; Opposition (politics); Gay rights; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.01992042772349259,"score_gpt":0.31721747252102594,"score_spread":0.2972970447975334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060962179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71623117,0.011273105,0.00037969972,0.07317654,0.00074445165,0.00011775893,0.00044104617,0.000047601374,0.19758861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95464927,0.003566389,0.0002963671,0.009885538,0.000043002576,0.000041759336,0.000104270934,0.000050519935,0.03136304],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387413,0.0011731242,0.00010518716,0.0005099572,0.0011224452,0.0032150885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921308,0.0012056393,0.00039364677,0.00018868565,0.001538596,0.0045426968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025322782,0.00047931093,0.00070371595,0.0021203575,0.04062077,0.011179465,0.002225009,0.0038832536,0.0077005164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060571865,0.00043813832,0.00038808442,0.004846838,0.015654571,0.0025456958,0.0060238643,0.005309422,0.00045461935],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030781823,0.00016552961,0.02873304,0.0004884556,0.0000783737,0.0047701267,0.7291717,0.00031715873,0.0011063943,0.109782726,0.071611844,0.053466912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000366795,0.000042017098,0.06104679,0.0007986351,0.000045725756,0.0004909765,0.6495534,0.00014695537,0.0002826179,0.002575631,0.28484327,0.00013734633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13374726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13374726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15725543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97040886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094051117","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2010.502085","title":"The State of “Sorry”: Official Apologies and their Absence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada; New Zealand Government","keywords":"Genocide; Wrongdoing; Phenomenon; State (computer science); Law; Acknowledgement; Government (linguistics); Political science; Turkish; Narrative; Sociology; Armenian; History; Epistemology; Literature","score_opus":0.013960204143815077,"score_gpt":0.30227350219986304,"score_spread":0.28831329805604794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094051117","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15773375,0.004394856,0.0075877295,0.08670154,0.0022099258,0.000050841038,0.00081489305,0.00062251335,0.7398839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503723,0.00072534726,0.0009591157,0.002290313,0.00048327618,0.000052130352,0.00028913497,0.00014121123,0.04468712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997256,0.0010550086,0.00011245323,0.00027620458,0.0009352662,0.00036509873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9785204,0.010966743,0.0040826886,0.0011953318,0.003132195,0.0021025715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032562576,0.00017990617,0.00027641287,0.0016825036,0.0042818277,0.006428821,0.0007424838,0.0018037483,0.045698866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048268918,0.0002292692,0.00013096834,0.001246359,0.004360835,0.0067356173,0.0034074977,0.0035345794,0.003393031],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003876156,0.00016511198,0.010415538,0.00015562004,0.00001468154,0.0010361746,0.04860435,0.00013665952,0.0004935855,0.48210874,0.34645534,0.11002659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056909743,0.00012611753,0.03324512,0.00072891207,0.000023938255,0.001834428,0.077637084,0.0014756076,0.00070746365,0.18585595,0.6982078,0.00010063476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041780123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060545024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045698866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023595137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011300516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15287787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123992305","doi":"10.1080/1475483042000185198","title":"The flogging of Bariya Magazu: Nigerian politics, Canadian pressures, and women’s and children’s rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Politics; Human rights; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.0076928383935572905,"score_gpt":0.248934497752437,"score_spread":0.24124165935887973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123992305","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16009372,0.11608796,0.0003287328,0.40288043,0.0023889127,0.00006536937,0.00068131194,0.000028550056,0.317445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8681172,0.0305106,0.0006626927,0.017933633,0.00030454993,0.00004183524,0.00015944199,0.00003812318,0.08223186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989973,0.00012531437,0.000020210602,0.00006446652,0.0002890724,0.0005037067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987902,0.00030917753,0.0001460677,0.00002003777,0.00037753303,0.00035697437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011656593,0.00036098887,0.0002488156,0.0016590891,0.027225312,0.004953628,0.00083807926,0.0032062498,0.013085711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026925104,0.00032237105,0.00018617872,0.0028306677,0.007355057,0.003220887,0.0031769036,0.00368132,0.00045074505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029498053,0.000045430806,0.0154033955,0.00071515917,0.00002461081,0.0027277078,0.19608234,0.00013695536,0.0020532808,0.28450525,0.40563065,0.09238026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026405569,0.000021402917,0.052014086,0.00076567783,0.000024912822,0.00045207317,0.112234004,0.00005376215,0.0005481005,0.006402968,0.82738024,0.000076491255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95112836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9877479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049300343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049300343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044280306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3577007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152313989","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2011.568915","title":"The Health Case for Economic and Social Rights Against the Global Marketplace","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"United Nations Development Programme","keywords":"Human rights; Globalization; Pessimism; Political economy; Lament; Population; Political science; Development economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.043070621448897,"score_gpt":0.3283266391563592,"score_spread":0.2852560177074622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152313989","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01456587,0.007956267,0.00077806297,0.85461384,0.0010040754,0.000011049228,0.000038512593,0.000009276324,0.12102301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7573256,0.008936283,0.0007432174,0.21084462,0.004659786,0.000068007575,0.00003782345,0.000039255516,0.017345378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324715,0.00392201,0.00008889121,0.00048016338,0.0007944684,0.0014672205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99250823,0.004413514,0.00067925884,0.00053342973,0.00044427157,0.0014213274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010978894,0.00036956393,0.00048256238,0.0010544388,0.007240718,0.011256421,0.0010414356,0.011444248,0.009227736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011081933,0.00023720381,0.00050473394,0.001009096,0.053362243,0.012681518,0.009856053,0.012671707,0.0007409182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001982414,0.000017781229,0.0004935323,0.000023475117,0.00000457429,0.00012657495,0.0029589012,0.000088552435,0.00003548083,0.9741356,0.017890431,0.00420526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044152588,0.00002399802,0.0013034942,0.00037409665,0.000010545437,0.00019624543,0.009120261,0.00013593677,0.00017325833,0.7658714,0.22272582,0.000020772875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007041109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011444248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005440668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007048234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058062613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334687402","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2013.824277","title":"What's in an Idea?: Truth Commission Policy Transfer in Ghana and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University; Carleton University","funders":"Society for the Humanities, Cornell University; Australian Government; National Research Centre","keywords":"Commission; Transitional justice; Human rights; Political science; Socialization; Sociology; Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.018661934890692074,"score_gpt":0.3187319491862205,"score_spread":0.30007001429552843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334687402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8691753,0.002727269,0.0011551244,0.039163467,0.000114366354,0.00015999906,0.00013911119,0.000020662761,0.08734461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942821,0.0007207234,0.00046611257,0.0011040858,0.000003678459,0.000019730152,0.000022627008,0.00000876318,0.0033722864],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99478877,0.0016553851,0.00011223474,0.0003208749,0.0007461491,0.002376668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425226,0.0026927614,0.00049864734,0.00017924463,0.0010586762,0.0013184348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042302236,0.0002589772,0.00035282268,0.0012757325,0.028815717,0.006706277,0.0013101733,0.0021261445,0.003225235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011968549,0.00025980966,0.00020074254,0.0039676824,0.018828997,0.0030619113,0.004219631,0.0037212877,0.00010986693],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121635196,0.00006747227,0.03008196,0.00024136688,0.000018545446,0.0045729997,0.6645296,0.0007873599,0.00081147294,0.25967824,0.0087526785,0.03033659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027053611,0.000020670703,0.015506304,0.00036709107,0.000020061156,0.00031841226,0.8888788,0.00063407415,0.0004867818,0.008800164,0.08487264,0.00006787507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98941284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9944476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13562943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13562943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16461876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.984065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913523709","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2018.1533454","title":"Value-free extradition? Human rights and the dilemma of surrendering wanted persons to China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; China; Law; International human rights law; Political science; Legislation; Dilemma; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Fundamental rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.034709511099625924,"score_gpt":0.3245750370196768,"score_spread":0.2898655259200509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913523709","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38120145,0.003900423,0.0053435722,0.20234941,0.0005676584,0.00008524288,0.000094664516,0.000038325074,0.4064193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97635174,0.00078048,0.0006476231,0.007896755,0.000096495,0.000030022778,0.000019791833,0.000010179202,0.01416699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99488515,0.0022919613,0.00014384583,0.00042811898,0.0008149273,0.0014359794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651957,0.0013772014,0.00031065667,0.0005200154,0.00047701164,0.00079561933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008102359,0.00025532805,0.0003921709,0.0009869575,0.009199651,0.008447772,0.0015106667,0.0050426098,0.0047371807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007631387,0.00020444549,0.00038081623,0.0012646707,0.030724281,0.006781859,0.0071271425,0.0049417047,0.0002523866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027201095,0.000024859759,0.0032960428,0.000030985626,0.0000106014095,0.00031714063,0.007972789,0.00028446014,0.0001505475,0.9728036,0.0043777367,0.010704001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000070786096,0.0001249042,0.01465546,0.00074136833,0.000050672796,0.0004806475,0.03840084,0.0025128108,0.0013433499,0.75891364,0.18257663,0.00012881697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049333956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072210774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049333956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01086315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016972147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09809363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972100672","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2019.1647100","title":"Resisting human rights through securitization: Russia and Hungary against LGBT rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Norm (philosophy); Human rights; Lesbian; Transgender; Political science; Phenomenon; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Gender studies; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.020393332980597298,"score_gpt":0.3232630046461169,"score_spread":0.3028696716655196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972100672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92712975,0.0011835757,0.0014899988,0.0047392156,0.00009275647,0.000020416,0.000016003229,0.000014436673,0.0653139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982572,0.000200535,0.00010854987,0.00023288174,0.0000074886843,0.000004074891,0.0000027927715,0.0000023748169,0.0011841126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984238,0.0006988881,0.00006138733,0.00009480746,0.0002146342,0.00050648703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994081,0.0002707258,0.00016834101,0.000044011136,0.000028645125,0.00008020243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017428603,0.00012876144,0.00027184474,0.00047509355,0.0031703988,0.0047234665,0.0004386542,0.0014362637,0.001509673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00217156,0.00012803003,0.00021667438,0.00040855145,0.009419016,0.0018388089,0.0038435822,0.0021600104,0.00016204875],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008515053,0.00008235917,0.017928965,0.000106866886,0.00001994632,0.003253989,0.12893005,0.0004376835,0.0014626877,0.82301867,0.0015058953,0.023167815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008799844,0.00027624224,0.15049927,0.0010898343,0.00012210956,0.004111302,0.4561653,0.0037562333,0.009086675,0.17822082,0.19646206,0.00012211526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00796589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074482495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00796589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034053572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027764286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024707735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198716659","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2021.1935221","title":"“When the ground opened”: Responsibility for harms and rights violations in disasters – Insights from Sierra Leone","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sierra leone; Accountability; Obligation; Collective responsibility; Responsibility to protect; Human rights; Natural disaster; Political science; State (computer science); Moral responsibility; Environmental ethics; State responsibility; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Socioeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.030964664406179652,"score_gpt":0.32168830019184375,"score_spread":0.29072363578566407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198716659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8347171,0.0073864455,0.0021977762,0.06249488,0.00020108555,0.00006536883,0.000033076456,0.000014018174,0.092890315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99514836,0.001983213,0.00020446337,0.00094690477,0.000032052216,0.000015450678,0.000007280225,0.0000050190956,0.0016572507],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770594,0.0016790075,0.00003407503,0.00009064068,0.000114819675,0.00037555906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974503,0.0016761961,0.000329507,0.00009573849,0.00015629797,0.00029197798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034368802,0.00039320017,0.00028947118,0.0012799144,0.0087827565,0.004887193,0.0010446039,0.0018719432,0.0014154441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038521602,0.00021334496,0.00022290657,0.00064271124,0.018879859,0.0053787967,0.0060467194,0.003518321,0.000098696255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023716313,0.00006397399,0.007871464,0.0001704428,0.0000121817575,0.0020986767,0.9042522,0.00033254168,0.00026440018,0.07140025,0.0023640417,0.011146179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005052098,0.000026717747,0.0060263285,0.00049420696,0.000008599458,0.00041000044,0.9512206,0.00017001542,0.00012162094,0.014635904,0.026867129,0.00001383898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028169934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049021844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028169934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004565585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005801776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056011915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211705068","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2021.1977919","title":"Closing chapters of the past? Rhetorical strategies in political apologies for human rights violations across the world","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Redress; Human rights; Politics; Political science; Meaning (existential); State (computer science); Transformative learning; Sociology; Law; Political economy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.048650278286814855,"score_gpt":0.3981279291005753,"score_spread":0.3494776508137605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211705068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65490645,0.008103257,0.03369583,0.02741633,0.0007028622,0.00011743173,0.00005881593,0.0002468581,0.27475208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99075806,0.0007894413,0.0039242213,0.0015012806,0.00006643024,0.000026907292,0.000013674837,0.000060063736,0.0028599035],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814984,0.015667485,0.00039705556,0.0005686332,0.0012393008,0.00062899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701297,0.022118911,0.0047575017,0.0012465973,0.0010410249,0.00070613605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014682662,0.00041554074,0.00035138213,0.0025851498,0.005778353,0.00842059,0.00092288596,0.0027707785,0.0027455166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04217729,0.00032849124,0.00025159618,0.0014694534,0.0137868095,0.008385234,0.0050432696,0.003478667,0.00047019156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008129374,0.0000858398,0.0075357384,0.00026775958,0.00004300506,0.00096641923,0.60241634,0.0002889087,0.0020045843,0.3062959,0.007607622,0.07240657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004818864,0.000157076,0.012767417,0.00190541,0.00008628109,0.002007148,0.51787406,0.0020472188,0.0033823,0.146194,0.31338462,0.00014627275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009726857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019728474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014682662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020842182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002196561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07765031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318715574","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2022.2150518","title":"The International Criminal Court at 25","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminal court; Criminology; Law; Criminal procedure; Psychology; International law","score_opus":0.035347113593149744,"score_gpt":0.346870822500671,"score_spread":0.3115237089075213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318715574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022628745,0.0027343757,0.00052219455,0.016061649,0.001431516,0.000047509093,0.0002579919,0.000054958993,0.97662693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15361413,0.0025632873,0.0010454975,0.049234845,0.0015430334,0.00022398,0.00070920057,0.00011488399,0.7909511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931599,0.0009536229,0.0002775119,0.0008833787,0.0024672356,0.0022583415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749076,0.00064210047,0.00013178684,0.00029552443,0.000869517,0.00057038513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003101442,0.00066086143,0.00044378793,0.002396977,0.015417551,0.0150977,0.0018138436,0.008925325,0.03725469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009682631,0.00042901887,0.0007642549,0.001601135,0.0053500165,0.0036364687,0.005529016,0.009167469,0.008777843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013271931,0.000017119455,0.00048532005,0.000015627958,0.0000044545577,0.00027783366,0.0011411365,0.00007983293,0.00008574908,0.6933652,0.29002306,0.014491396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004914088,0.000007907595,0.0010871504,0.00017762228,0.0000051279203,0.00011705972,0.0010106718,0.00011668466,0.00012352761,0.027438065,0.96988755,0.000023791788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09694083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1332936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09694083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011257811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019755403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19275314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383555506","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2023.2227206","title":"Human rights, human goods, universality, and colonialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Amnesty; Transgender; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.04780599738554387,"score_gpt":0.39784008375797614,"score_spread":0.3500340863724323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383555506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008207231,0.061008535,0.0032314274,0.1049088,0.0019673775,0.000026916183,0.00007911454,0.00004539874,0.8205253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5945363,0.066897646,0.005536605,0.034754097,0.0038777965,0.00018840503,0.00012069507,0.00012470876,0.29396367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991055,0.00044354633,0.000029337974,0.0000750319,0.00019528242,0.0001512319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875236,0.00087636756,0.000087636334,0.00011079094,0.00008868019,0.00008414957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010003257,0.0003284405,0.00036103136,0.0010400302,0.00297443,0.0053276173,0.00064784975,0.0019037529,0.0086557865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017279176,0.00014487923,0.00023628424,0.001479094,0.024274062,0.0047654836,0.001807677,0.0039527104,0.0008625958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068031195,0.0000069581574,0.00012134206,0.00006243081,0.0000032403457,0.000033156724,0.0027131836,0.000050619234,0.000036323065,0.96556985,0.023033706,0.008362455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000748867,0.000017705297,0.0012627807,0.0003898215,0.0000050299573,0.000108498854,0.0049108225,0.00012844978,0.00013258855,0.45718,0.5358452,0.000011536153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007837676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013558764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0086557865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033256097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018539857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028956473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385949551","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2023.2239273","title":"Transitional justice for the “war on terror?”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; Human rights; Law; Sociology; Terrorism; Economic Justice; Political science; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); International law; Legal profession; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05365091166888175,"score_gpt":0.3774631505426517,"score_spread":0.32381223887377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385949551","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05390165,0.010892395,0.009624618,0.60651195,0.002992555,0.000042860767,0.000065716165,0.00009359554,0.31587464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94749105,0.0021222788,0.0013302088,0.0362585,0.00073806295,0.00004746831,0.00002653962,0.000038495305,0.011947466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954684,0.002026577,0.0000926734,0.00037330558,0.0003971989,0.00164185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997465,0.00090166734,0.00027122386,0.00029937376,0.0003072449,0.00075547904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005910954,0.00022281581,0.00030595562,0.0005977218,0.013774853,0.009640738,0.0011338125,0.006598249,0.0069717634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010429686,0.00012542192,0.00042336844,0.0005155705,0.024234809,0.012191836,0.0064896406,0.009328119,0.0009207469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014689854,0.000019266128,0.00024563074,0.000027775362,0.0000024419753,0.00007903965,0.005113446,0.000067726556,0.00006361532,0.97746277,0.00922694,0.0076767993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009130783,0.00002400686,0.0010026473,0.0003232487,0.0000059379563,0.00013674895,0.025497252,0.00023415756,0.00021642078,0.8377062,0.13481873,0.000025606498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0101598175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015675623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013774853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005859925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012990534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042516947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387334255","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2023.2259420","title":"Contextuality of the strategy of human right to water: Struggle for water access to slum-dwellers in Mumbai, India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Slum; Political science; Appeal; Denial; Legitimacy; Normative; Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Law; Public administration; Psychology; Politics; Population","score_opus":0.038010256353449484,"score_gpt":0.35362700803707936,"score_spread":0.3156167516836299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387334255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990369,0.000275225,0.00013859205,0.0013570933,0.000006349489,0.000014671408,0.00002206501,0.000002389434,0.007814412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954456,0.00012262871,0.000033578384,0.000062431114,0.0000022389145,0.000003623956,0.0000058856504,9.3529655e-7,0.00022417265],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982658,0.00089645514,0.000052232423,0.00013098298,0.00009557693,0.00055895746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998164,0.0010912403,0.00037283346,0.00007209347,0.00009012121,0.00020981046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009767811,0.00016221864,0.0002103894,0.0009366379,0.0060350955,0.004072073,0.0007339095,0.00068821013,0.0027977792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026307304,0.00024199991,0.00010392128,0.0013340324,0.010128308,0.0016606736,0.0046222704,0.0014619087,0.000098732686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054178956,0.00008962508,0.0836382,0.00020626717,0.0000242849,0.003605067,0.8673294,0.00022432281,0.0019575516,0.031182885,0.00074860244,0.010939494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016934296,0.000019262383,0.06920342,0.000090884685,0.000007576538,0.00023753148,0.9237282,0.000060610884,0.00020204649,0.001470683,0.0049637896,0.000014269608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07016853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23032477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07016853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055294274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043003066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13952017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400947528","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2024.2374562","title":"Measuring absence: Narrative obstacles to counting contemporary enforced disappearances in Latin America","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Narrative; Latin Americans; Politics; Accountability; Amnesty; Political science; State (computer science); CLARITY; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Literature","score_opus":0.06881128595805192,"score_gpt":0.35053604941610866,"score_spread":0.28172476345805675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400947528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86948997,0.0041577774,0.011157387,0.04572498,0.00040824362,0.00023487333,0.0014013181,0.00010059936,0.06732477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990355,0.0017749413,0.0034360737,0.0009959093,0.0001455018,0.00025947383,0.00041130398,0.00005990113,0.0025620176],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9674618,0.024403075,0.0023312601,0.0012130655,0.0035781357,0.0010126528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85402715,0.104806386,0.02114897,0.007855385,0.010591767,0.0015703848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04253677,0.00042522335,0.0005069398,0.006142681,0.0063619846,0.011275304,0.0024406966,0.0014837676,0.0019644315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14596832,0.000577391,0.00022889001,0.0059227,0.011583187,0.01176829,0.009605155,0.0035131122,0.00022964178],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011575914,0.00004312801,0.044003703,0.0005115659,0.000027999879,0.0005755992,0.8385954,0.0002025465,0.0007719098,0.06083524,0.0078037116,0.046513468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070692113,0.00003513105,0.016846959,0.0010654391,0.000016363307,0.00027369364,0.9043226,0.00046007038,0.0009644073,0.011240682,0.06472445,0.000043223714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013711734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019107113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04253677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006078764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005149908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2249586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401245569","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2024.2380703","title":"One foreign force, two nationalisms: How Chinese nationalism resists external LGBT human rights pressure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Human rights; Ideology; Politics; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Gender studies; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.027074784018748257,"score_gpt":0.35332230679479826,"score_spread":0.32624752277605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401245569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95005256,0.000327183,0.00086790236,0.0029980363,0.00005311633,0.000025015119,0.0000075646853,0.000012612432,0.04565593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99795866,0.0000853481,0.0001266602,0.00013621262,0.000005107464,0.000006424268,0.0000034541433,0.0000042012534,0.0016738363],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998175,0.0009086193,0.000055195098,0.00020877905,0.0002570349,0.00039533078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991161,0.00031199618,0.00017003056,0.00010072527,0.00013422706,0.00016679516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003602723,0.00034306347,0.0003123185,0.00096323615,0.008737141,0.0045291972,0.0006469002,0.0011035852,0.0024917142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031282948,0.00015317572,0.00023333711,0.0008034766,0.013159218,0.0036589634,0.0034796738,0.001529562,0.0001244962],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045672627,0.000034602355,0.01828951,0.000086206244,0.00001943858,0.0006716778,0.87010247,0.000107869775,0.00238082,0.08761365,0.0010560065,0.019592166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025654943,0.00013578856,0.034372777,0.00018962186,0.00007973376,0.0003352772,0.8779888,0.0014998529,0.0020351645,0.020811543,0.062447,0.00007869429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026021786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03159101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026021786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048224023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046283756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051740646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404299876","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2024.2416123","title":"A discursive attempt toward the political economy of homophobia in Nigeria","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.029734574304540965,"score_gpt":0.35174244657594217,"score_spread":0.3220078722714012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404299876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4600075,0.009253518,0.027600499,0.06568664,0.0013814291,0.00016100702,0.00007247699,0.00003557775,0.4358014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898567,0.0013106262,0.0014979637,0.0012432686,0.0001120551,0.0000377977,0.000007228176,0.000020522033,0.0059138103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968117,0.0024475572,0.00006767134,0.0002281411,0.00022652396,0.00021852598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996716,0.002495677,0.00026618154,0.0002282058,0.00019133357,0.00010263641],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065305075,0.00035319678,0.00030772018,0.0018001092,0.011298419,0.010498246,0.00062413415,0.0025505302,0.0018346214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051812907,0.00029818952,0.00015665637,0.0009906518,0.04611572,0.0073188315,0.0040437947,0.0051882504,0.00013416071],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092982855,0.000009954498,0.00043277576,0.00002737047,0.0000013506875,0.0001759461,0.18587787,0.000052515756,0.00022507412,0.8094568,0.0006359478,0.0030951947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009958619,0.000025566133,0.0016926448,0.0008381689,0.000008930187,0.0004961617,0.45628798,0.00073324936,0.0013474178,0.35292453,0.18560249,0.000032843283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057005696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009572388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011298419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004568338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032443549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034537017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408960760","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2025.2477493","title":"Intersectionality as method for human rights research: Identifying who is made stateless and how through UN treaty body reviews","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Stateless protocol; Intersectionality; Treaty; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Criminology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.19329244161996811,"score_gpt":0.5022564356971042,"score_spread":0.3089639940771361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408960760","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027138587,0.043040704,0.5837712,0.051125586,0.004451116,0.0071378155,0.0016675217,0.0007995708,0.2808679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5186839,0.020271888,0.38407165,0.008519302,0.0017893312,0.03498743,0.0015461192,0.0018416623,0.02828873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.6045024,0.3440875,0.014255619,0.010766737,0.02365164,0.0027360895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5751936,0.33053914,0.017520325,0.04796464,0.02625835,0.0025238867],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.25258362,0.001100267,0.0027669496,0.02466136,0.011899291,0.026955033,0.0045020413,0.0048236083,0.015919473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30472285,0.0017539664,0.0017627372,0.02209141,0.037204646,0.036787838,0.022566631,0.0062901466,0.0021605182],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010714016,0.00006946212,0.0027184372,0.0030286342,0.00014799421,0.00016870485,0.11811689,0.00020282206,0.00039286938,0.7482401,0.011845703,0.11496128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062060695,0.00014050993,0.002705262,0.014595409,0.00023728752,0.00035385723,0.09987835,0.0010628254,0.0017890114,0.39814016,0.4808961,0.00013915305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030198682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043857065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25258362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01265362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023458386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92169744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412739144","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2025.2530101","title":"Rights education and the children’s university","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.00851183644336088,"score_gpt":0.2930656046337233,"score_spread":0.2845537681903624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412739144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09332641,0.010393087,0.0036462853,0.08383435,0.0004952862,0.000054530585,0.00009828225,0.000055389686,0.8080964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9490844,0.0035214312,0.0009972603,0.0043313853,0.00016701102,0.000072559254,0.000029318155,0.000032657645,0.04176389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99288684,0.0037211722,0.00015858567,0.00042647705,0.00077126315,0.0020356893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648786,0.0015936848,0.000459252,0.00026001094,0.00024058345,0.00095863873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051261676,0.00029667976,0.00028438587,0.0013657686,0.012403839,0.009373178,0.00070958654,0.0035584522,0.012389396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056387475,0.00020397779,0.00030231726,0.0012682484,0.03828083,0.008371942,0.013794684,0.005397651,0.0007006911],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055184983,0.000016684888,0.0010730533,0.000019574927,0.0000014736098,0.0000793255,0.020788359,0.000055839824,0.000035966295,0.9672627,0.002665588,0.007995873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017292155,0.0000643548,0.0056840046,0.0007190132,0.0000070624824,0.00044337907,0.069272965,0.00014509536,0.0003701212,0.18348354,0.73974437,0.000048809037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045645222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069644384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045645222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014297448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015379003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103735745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}