{"meta":{"query_hash":"09bb8716bae8","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Human Rights"},"cohort_total":26,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":26,"exported":26,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/09bb8716bae8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Human+Rights"},"results":[{"id":"W2006963724","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2014.886951","title":"The Destruction of Identity: Cultural Genocide and Indigenous Peoples","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genocide; Indigenous; Human rights; Political science; International law; Criminology; Sociology; Tribe; Law; Cultural diversity; Ethnic group; Environmental ethics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.013104830016400624,"score_gpt":0.3136480317647338,"score_spread":0.3005432017483332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006963724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921701,0.0004145785,0.000044011056,0.00008621906,0.0007056455,0.00011784299,4.5631123e-7,0.000005886282,0.006455243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954908,0.0016270579,0.00023687992,0.000005859514,0.0011010626,1.9560898e-7,5.9193206e-7,0.0000042053985,0.0015333372],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986573,0.00027839345,0.0003899877,0.000067573885,0.00039183066,0.0002149012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871343,0.00015264792,0.0005541759,0.00008560347,0.0003866456,0.00010752125],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013553142,0.00006710324,0.00015772437,0.00008254144,0.009463779,0.00011256132,0.0002300023,0.00006783293,0.000020887928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009713661,0.000035285644,0.0000647002,0.00009073819,0.00035848867,0.00047542603,0.0000013344988,0.00013792703,0.0000031840384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009943652,0.000027548473,0.0014201686,0.000021047232,0.000028468892,0.0000014222487,0.52748865,8.5553853e-7,0.000064095235,0.4705732,0.00006415947,0.00030044458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068529847,0.00062376464,0.084339224,0.00012481512,0.00013069915,0.00014853556,0.03270803,0.0000013336073,0.0013502265,0.4828955,0.39672422,0.00026835685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.77472353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74853355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009221038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011707919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99182576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033638760","doi":"10.1080/14754830902717734","title":"Technologies of Telling: Discourse, Transparency, and Erasure in Guatemalan Truth Commission Testimony","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Transparency (behavior); State (computer science); State of exception; Sociology; Power (physics); Context (archaeology); Erasure; Law; Representation (politics); Epistemology; Political science; Politics; History; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0327717221796118,"score_gpt":0.3650321356677401,"score_spread":0.3322604134881283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033638760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812257,0.0009390457,0.000020773039,0.005286665,0.00008112515,0.000086394815,0.0000025154973,0.000020074198,0.012337655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999478,0.00017230275,0.00020970829,0.0000137655825,0.000060826118,1.8610638e-7,4.8572025e-7,0.0000017983158,0.000062932544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879813,0.0001283682,0.00044314246,0.00008388846,0.00034448903,0.00020197504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993726,0.00008235932,0.0002719779,0.00007756199,0.0000938628,0.000101656566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009732214,0.00007816334,0.00026736368,0.00017404517,0.00030082156,0.000032638873,0.000257759,0.000131584,0.000024453573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078423145,0.00005316424,0.000046795267,0.0002137608,0.00023615456,0.00024167034,0.000005865174,0.0002862421,4.0812913e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010719701,0.0010848172,0.021013089,0.00010313703,0.000029962637,0.00017327066,0.04563176,0.000029539668,0.000787814,0.9000909,0.00214193,0.028806599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001225143,0.0014871683,0.074550584,0.0008224515,0.000033890723,0.000025716696,0.007324473,0.000022631555,0.00086201937,0.8782762,0.0351108,0.00025887106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00062283344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025298442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053537495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041675776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100030695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23137066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035292434","doi":"10.1080/1475483042000210676","title":"Introduction: world civility?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"World Systems and Global Transformations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Political science; Law; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.017847915969647965,"score_gpt":0.3077817780499346,"score_spread":0.28993386208028665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035292434","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5533397,0.0002715384,0.0006079709,0.03920987,0.0033076687,0.0002156193,0.000002859115,0.000048684728,0.40299606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890322,0.000003551523,0.0002024452,0.000036431633,0.0041154297,5.06214e-7,4.1539246e-7,0.0000021393153,0.0066068885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99903035,0.00007036648,0.00035314768,0.000053800257,0.00035576595,0.00013658601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994429,0.00001268115,0.00016894919,0.00007827773,0.00019127951,0.000105907435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064109254,0.000050885028,0.00012948002,0.00014003474,0.00087114295,0.00006934915,0.00015782991,0.000025808613,0.0007035706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009822442,0.00003708672,0.00010440223,0.00024704603,0.00011345368,0.00048065357,0.0000036222716,0.00013803452,0.000055136996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046684604,0.00006981102,0.000094076095,0.000004743564,0.000021284372,0.000012172929,0.0049736686,0.000056749115,0.00004704206,0.97225976,0.022381673,0.00007433118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002930085,0.000040145096,0.0011045825,0.000032132775,0.000012318697,0.000013507995,0.00031437492,7.1348424e-8,0.00013231384,0.13897881,0.8590256,0.000053154046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006006905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036216144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83664393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016119643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080248275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9813704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2046376874","doi":"10.1080/14754830903530292","title":"International Organizations and Human Rights: Realizing, Resisting or Repackaging the Right to Water?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Mandate; Treaty; International human rights law; Political science; Right to development; Normative; International law; International community; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Public administration; Public relations; Sociology","score_opus":0.018604656099342486,"score_gpt":0.3242230271407528,"score_spread":0.3056183710414103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2046376874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9239079,0.0000055814994,0.00008565695,0.0044295676,0.00091922673,0.00017580735,0.0000022481954,0.000041440937,0.07043257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98151195,0.0000018878927,0.0013146932,0.0001361221,0.0017118853,0.0000024860044,0.0000043000123,0.000013946107,0.015302728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980668,0.00013408111,0.0006250636,0.00020309704,0.0006543077,0.00031663838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985432,0.00010495402,0.00029446444,0.00020602974,0.0006038283,0.00024754961],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014206282,0.00014881245,0.00021769524,0.0002599371,0.006450817,0.0004791245,0.00063628546,0.000084817286,0.0032064053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075488955,0.000065082895,0.0000577335,0.00018023804,0.00028118776,0.00038023942,0.00009974643,0.0003974703,0.000030207779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026848791,0.00012110075,0.00091421657,0.000007792404,0.00012914797,0.00022973616,0.05041975,0.0000025616712,0.0089114895,0.90677816,0.032336958,0.00012221716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032083236,0.00006799709,0.0022462076,0.00007271806,0.00003285996,0.00005624098,0.00038798168,0.0000014510824,0.0035435483,0.073860146,0.91922665,0.00018337741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012389659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.048166458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8868897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010440414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008223945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050742697","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2010.501262","title":"Hannah Arendt's “Right to Have Rights”: A Philosophical Context for Human Security","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Popularity; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Human security; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03768449564788048,"score_gpt":0.363245206861581,"score_spread":0.32556071121370056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050742697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89876777,0.00003794028,0.00012454521,0.022168778,0.0018530772,0.00080983876,0.00007185637,0.00008910383,0.0760771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880047,4.805016e-7,0.00037218255,0.0008577126,0.009441806,0.000022830118,0.0000075963994,0.000035722063,0.0012569705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959266,0.00028145846,0.0011446985,0.00045155603,0.0012013915,0.0009942864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960379,0.0003584431,0.00053478027,0.00046733476,0.0010492214,0.0015523039],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001497493,0.00037651393,0.0007859866,0.0004977597,0.0029032328,0.00029561162,0.0012316877,0.00041689904,0.0013287597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027729623,0.0002823594,0.0006169894,0.00020208636,0.0009558297,0.0006365825,0.0000911148,0.0012424965,0.00013660926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000692526,0.0004053547,0.000072928255,0.000016079488,0.000082834915,0.00012183381,0.0054482743,3.5196595e-7,0.0020063517,0.9818972,0.009832625,0.000046955905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009531062,0.0005511425,0.00011655974,0.00006119523,0.00006771134,0.000022044767,0.00011501465,0.0000021965598,0.0035958397,0.7433201,0.2508751,0.0003199811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009268817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025643334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24104246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019812807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018178404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052593205","doi":"10.1080/1475483042000185260","title":"Critiquing desire: philosophy, writing and terror","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Aesthetics; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Media studies; Psychology; Psychoanalysis; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07390199807158965,"score_gpt":0.2950460822075685,"score_spread":0.22114408413597886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052593205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9142048,0.0007401968,0.000024035657,0.0034340725,0.00094791467,0.00007666421,0.000008015681,0.00003656659,0.080527745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99375063,0.000008727807,0.00018858566,0.00038169135,0.0053191124,8.415709e-7,0.0000017474737,0.000018494677,0.00033014076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987764,0.00004368498,0.00054261467,0.0001312901,0.00029287415,0.00021316807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992099,0.000033338965,0.000282663,0.00011470651,0.00023237846,0.00012705206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035229276,0.00015590522,0.00028720647,0.0001770451,0.0010173414,0.00027511458,0.00018109196,0.00006165286,0.00019244228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013003579,0.00011800629,0.00014687458,0.000015239774,0.00039942702,0.0005984071,0.00003261668,0.00040086938,0.000015237412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017073082,0.000073174284,0.0000065306685,0.00005584603,0.000049569702,0.00017553271,0.017925607,0.0000015032958,0.00037301768,0.9810659,0.000200023,0.000056169352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009515777,0.00031869859,0.00006457353,0.00040624093,0.00006128908,0.0001774112,0.0006809362,0.0000011653958,0.00047932964,0.9882219,0.008454759,0.00018215587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005718518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018673143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0801976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004597817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027612616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78246707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052758654","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2013.824283","title":"Beyond Repair?: Collective and Moral Reparations at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Tribunal; Crimes against humanity; Genocide; Law; Political science; Jurisprudence; War crime; Politics; Criminal court; Criminology; Sociology; International law","score_opus":0.02043590160680983,"score_gpt":0.2953473592035623,"score_spread":0.2749114575967525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052758654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90950507,0.00021199386,0.000016189253,0.0007989493,0.0003344683,0.0000942842,0.0000030584263,0.000014578293,0.08902143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95458204,0.000009149378,0.00008863622,0.00017527635,0.00075975497,0.0000017116398,7.4079674e-7,0.000003832284,0.044378847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988716,0.0003363166,0.0002450191,0.00009411837,0.0003097592,0.00014318318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920964,0.00017643276,0.00023600481,0.000104351566,0.00016080591,0.00011276614],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012320876,0.000066183806,0.00015827102,0.000039708008,0.0035176065,0.000053408894,0.00012228491,0.0000666579,0.00035203836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057687874,0.000041847397,0.00018556601,0.000107204534,0.00049224956,0.00020995807,0.000018467974,0.00018982256,0.000010014018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061150575,0.00008990225,0.0028130987,0.0000039919923,0.00010948634,0.000019198327,0.09352942,0.000008845368,0.00017525759,0.4369411,0.46619198,0.00005658844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071370363,0.0002927357,0.010882035,0.000015506106,0.000097814285,0.000033904824,0.0012226505,0.00002001833,0.000091764,0.12858193,0.85789984,0.00014810966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014175184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006627959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39170784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032549462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113764334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99777967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058231418","doi":"10.1080/1475483042000210702","title":"Paying for the past?: the movement for reparations for African-Americans","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Movement (music); Political science; Human rights; Human rights movement; Law; Criminology; Political economy; History; Sociology; International human rights law; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.06109158947098327,"score_gpt":0.2829998804115254,"score_spread":0.22190829094054215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058231418","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13079508,0.0023543648,0.5974687,0.15280375,0.009312975,0.010325364,0.0013393989,0.00016707396,0.09543331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804823,0.0000022338882,0.0006628927,0.0012739475,0.0028228967,0.00017140024,0.000006990006,0.000014903852,0.014562451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991647,0.000014394248,0.0004121815,0.00008333094,0.00012625144,0.00019912583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883884,0.0004491076,0.00025638918,0.00013171829,0.0002641278,0.000059841233],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023309517,0.00009829638,0.00017618459,0.000036661262,0.0019266234,0.00011026884,0.0002433882,0.000018619197,0.000042720923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021027685,0.00004246365,0.00032192952,0.00001763263,0.00019043068,0.000118131844,0.00000920697,0.000092199516,0.0000016881143],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042125164,0.00008057808,0.0000011674887,0.000011325509,0.000077077064,6.223285e-7,0.0052587977,0.000067377536,0.000020240323,0.975697,0.01859079,0.00015291995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044945782,0.00050360686,0.000007860679,0.000009102105,0.00007480889,0.0000010732243,0.0007414769,0.00014034804,0.000013181854,0.39146826,0.60653543,0.000055402226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011015321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009022609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8496872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001013225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045347097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2060962179","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2014.923754","title":"Resisting LGBT Rights Where “We Have Won”: Canada and Great Britain","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Lesbian; Legislation; Opposition (politics); Gay rights; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.01992042772349259,"score_gpt":0.31721747252102594,"score_spread":0.2972970447975334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2060962179","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9482305,0.0016429193,0.00001785474,0.0018784971,0.0010444245,0.00009180042,0.000007020849,0.0000138154965,0.047073167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9545925,0.0000459694,0.00009334358,0.00022570364,0.0024990197,0.0000013386692,0.0000017228184,0.000021033082,0.04251935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794924,0.00033941143,0.00068606203,0.00021710354,0.00036847888,0.00043969412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984347,0.00019494297,0.0005307544,0.00029228404,0.00017856703,0.00036870898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005375525,0.00019718806,0.00041168917,0.00020534931,0.00092328247,0.00008776072,0.00028270963,0.00013824878,0.000620016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021875021,0.0001465292,0.00009068004,0.00006451559,0.00010368236,0.00015969564,0.000028969172,0.000487455,0.00002844912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015832875,0.00019153184,0.07022963,0.00066217117,0.00031176882,0.0016925144,0.0034589302,0.000002725519,0.00009622542,0.099396646,0.82015574,0.003643795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003088792,0.0007069648,0.1584647,0.00032329533,0.00025487377,0.0015474441,0.00011336737,0.0000104236615,0.000044981407,0.1692136,0.6656756,0.00055600173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72793937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97224206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2443027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001658656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013554707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71012354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094051117","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2010.502085","title":"The State of “Sorry”: Official Apologies and their Absence","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada; New Zealand Government","keywords":"Genocide; Wrongdoing; Phenomenon; State (computer science); Law; Acknowledgement; Government (linguistics); Political science; Turkish; Narrative; Sociology; Armenian; History; Epistemology; Literature","score_opus":0.013960204143815077,"score_gpt":0.30227350219986304,"score_spread":0.28831329805604794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094051117","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9971073,0.00036428307,0.0000092207065,0.00009216739,0.0013266583,0.000044576078,0.0000029398211,0.0000053910276,0.0010474451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988769,0.000023777786,0.000018918441,0.0000052189907,0.000110359695,5.901793e-7,1.9866563e-7,0.0000059795257,0.00095804717],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930775,0.000050998326,0.00033974965,0.00006848314,0.000096178555,0.00013683071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992214,0.000112781054,0.00037403937,0.00014728466,0.00010219604,0.00004231028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029888187,0.000083070256,0.00017632778,0.00006803538,0.00026498752,0.000019931145,0.00022185732,0.0000792421,0.00014358787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005994656,0.0000355177,0.00007837981,0.000040372088,0.00040487107,0.000052055908,0.000022705473,0.00045160315,0.000006067286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002069995,0.0023616452,0.017606266,0.0000781699,0.0017518913,0.0010180213,0.06869799,0.00008425903,0.3972602,0.35909027,0.012084909,0.1378964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041155596,0.0034367407,0.5128445,0.00019951345,0.0002160608,0.0016046449,0.0031679133,0.000022064218,0.053852357,0.3375355,0.0823443,0.0006608532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000069438385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003478276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4952382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004302701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000160873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20380966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123992305","doi":"10.1080/1475483042000185198","title":"The flogging of Bariya Magazu: Nigerian politics, Canadian pressures, and women’s and children’s rights","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Politics; Human rights; Political science; Law; Gender studies; Sociology","score_opus":0.0076928383935572905,"score_gpt":0.248934497752437,"score_spread":0.24124165935887973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123992305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922161,0.0005436521,0.0000033189174,0.00092227844,0.00024493868,0.00013856676,0.0000060778484,0.0000071155223,0.005917952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977713,0.000047576865,0.00013087071,0.00006833318,0.0003980768,0.0000016115818,7.9298263e-7,0.0000071512072,0.001574272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983985,0.00011090796,0.0004598384,0.00013523795,0.0004136832,0.00048182372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988231,0.00006001353,0.00026990348,0.0001253905,0.00016185117,0.0005597265],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008495573,0.00013324492,0.0002624611,0.00020145807,0.0030964767,0.00020199969,0.00027734286,0.00008623016,0.00013490442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017114517,0.00007486702,0.00004841947,0.000055506243,0.0006273593,0.00022343507,0.000027081074,0.00020805717,0.0000024100336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015000754,0.00005481015,0.00287782,0.000011729975,0.00017840539,0.000093432085,0.075349264,0.00000530509,0.000036038204,0.91908497,0.002050365,0.00024287435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009734762,0.00017757135,0.08470721,0.00009926123,0.000031405598,0.000060883744,0.00093605404,5.119819e-7,0.00023616244,0.7124363,0.20010567,0.00023545207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09333722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5847378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49140057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003378741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048611502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2152313989","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2011.568915","title":"The Health Case for Economic and Social Rights Against the Global Marketplace","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Population and Public Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"United Nations Development Programme","keywords":"Human rights; Globalization; Pessimism; Political economy; Lament; Population; Political science; Development economics; Sociology; Economic growth; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.043070621448897,"score_gpt":0.3283266391563592,"score_spread":0.2852560177074622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2152313989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96797246,0.00027335412,0.000039612827,0.0035710607,0.00085713156,0.00039604524,0.000012242533,0.000014164272,0.02686395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971674,0.000026333644,0.00022170281,0.00021214367,0.0008960847,0.0000045941024,5.789469e-7,0.000005549537,0.0014656183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998579,0.00026760643,0.00047986582,0.000119173645,0.00021330813,0.0003409979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900615,0.00015835404,0.0005031023,0.00009670626,0.00008815189,0.00014754593],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021863584,0.00011595234,0.00021091162,0.00003194335,0.008990195,0.00018975366,0.00033418374,0.000059313752,0.00011636039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000049172995,0.000050602626,0.0001242591,0.000027356862,0.00048773334,0.00018053174,0.000029452565,0.00013962032,0.00000852354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010500703,0.00004551171,0.00011999653,0.0000070158285,0.000099793804,0.00013147613,0.03772725,1.7760638e-7,3.2525512e-7,0.917632,0.042479366,0.0016520839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059686333,0.00016642812,0.0015442837,0.0000133647445,0.000021043907,0.00015471724,0.0018753818,0.0000042582874,0.0000070149777,0.35379356,0.6417021,0.00012098401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013022774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08240208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5992227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037113414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031193768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334687402","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2013.824277","title":"What's in an Idea?: Truth Commission Policy Transfer in Ghana and Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University; Carleton University","funders":"Society for the Humanities, Cornell University; Australian Government; National Research Centre","keywords":"Commission; Transitional justice; Human rights; Political science; Socialization; Sociology; Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.018661934890692074,"score_gpt":0.3187319491862205,"score_spread":0.30007001429552843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334687402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99059314,0.000059207785,0.00000373898,0.0019532905,0.00014380543,0.000032802294,9.256984e-7,0.0000018345893,0.0072112777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99891466,0.00001062397,0.000008041525,0.00021650178,0.00035056248,2.5369215e-7,1.883093e-7,0.0000029774367,0.00049621455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989742,0.00018559744,0.0002566202,0.000067319546,0.00029450384,0.00022176337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952644,0.000096261516,0.000051838982,0.000056468463,0.000039310642,0.00022965619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004786658,0.000060403912,0.0001697882,0.00009808043,0.00016673276,0.00008399641,0.00016425956,0.00004896532,0.00003904142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053381096,0.000044679597,0.000021710439,0.00007932046,0.00008964134,0.0005686682,0.000005778607,0.00018156499,3.468675e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026819387,0.00006628203,0.0039232536,0.000008294471,0.0000038300627,0.000058207126,0.01111616,0.0000014220661,0.00009252085,0.9833223,0.0002438858,0.0011369983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032325645,0.00054704474,0.49964723,0.0006495047,0.000018208682,0.000013885174,0.00540694,0.0000660537,0.0007832826,0.21579073,0.2733715,0.00047306568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79454535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99029744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7675316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018076693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028517598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20682277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913523709","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2018.1533454","title":"Value-free extradition? Human rights and the dilemma of surrendering wanted persons to China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; China; Law; International human rights law; Political science; Legislation; Dilemma; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Fundamental rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.034709511099625924,"score_gpt":0.3245750370196768,"score_spread":0.2898655259200509,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913523709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985523,0.00004716088,0.000398437,0.0005153351,0.00030945145,0.00016041157,0.000010373518,0.000014382946,0.013021448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978799,0.0000027356139,0.00025453084,0.000023132556,0.0013877274,0.0000011612682,0.0000013731433,0.000007228049,0.00044218067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985086,0.00036695547,0.00034992886,0.00012928882,0.00045527273,0.00018997633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990191,0.00009089277,0.00034044634,0.00021246327,0.00020063769,0.0001364872],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013005871,0.00010400087,0.00021835526,0.00016484376,0.0023862144,0.00010558496,0.00045422668,0.00004146882,0.00017653762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007259644,0.00006146879,0.000094707844,0.00013981859,0.0006991771,0.00040376504,0.00004846312,0.00022394325,0.000008807226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036660812,0.0002216457,0.0001066827,0.0000701672,0.00016559273,0.00008828143,0.10001779,0.0000054325037,0.006176658,0.8769831,0.015227298,0.00057071337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010805542,0.005998164,0.09567042,0.0018491179,0.0016395198,0.00041561958,0.015343389,0.00010568667,0.011281874,0.6746815,0.18096498,0.0012441924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034176128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059313797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20230162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042767075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023994733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972100672","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2019.1647100","title":"Resisting human rights through securitization: Russia and Hungary against LGBT rights","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Global Security and Public Health","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Securitization; Norm (philosophy); Human rights; Lesbian; Transgender; Political science; Phenomenon; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Gender studies; Business; Epistemology","score_opus":0.020393332980597298,"score_gpt":0.3232630046461169,"score_spread":0.3028696716655196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972100672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79977036,0.00034944032,0.000009289173,0.0010362549,0.0005939411,0.00022736638,0.0000056302247,0.0000425992,0.19796512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955905,0.000026741,0.00029003993,0.00027979596,0.0016542547,0.0000012466152,0.000011103483,0.000011531117,0.0021347944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967705,0.0005684293,0.0008511065,0.00029734056,0.00094341923,0.00056921126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981267,0.00015674678,0.00071285106,0.0002315555,0.00035890474,0.00041324642],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015137218,0.00022546726,0.0004902181,0.00017871219,0.005338874,0.0003217516,0.00048797397,0.00026236754,0.00070182054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025212214,0.0001697665,0.0001546723,0.00030150104,0.0003295367,0.0012710739,0.000053092557,0.000573439,0.000053671934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018035698,0.0001446563,0.00068378344,0.00005539138,0.00005501623,0.00014087369,0.016607853,0.000002332571,0.00010990429,0.9733154,0.008805596,0.00006116636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007761362,0.00020846183,0.0022836544,0.00026486398,0.000027029113,0.000028864408,0.00026503621,0.0000051609154,0.00010571771,0.39794448,0.5978475,0.00024303138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00485239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020484993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58904195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020524091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000138885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9973886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3198716659","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2021.1935221","title":"“When the ground opened”: Responsibility for harms and rights violations in disasters – Insights from Sierra Leone","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Disaster Management and Resilience","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sierra leone; Accountability; Obligation; Collective responsibility; Responsibility to protect; Human rights; Natural disaster; Political science; State (computer science); Moral responsibility; Environmental ethics; State responsibility; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Socioeconomics; Geography","score_opus":0.030964664406179652,"score_gpt":0.32168830019184375,"score_spread":0.29072363578566407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3198716659","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98920363,0.00036751648,0.00016850437,0.0017254408,0.000377477,0.00026603127,0.000004281019,0.000006307269,0.007880817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99533606,0.0000130749795,0.00032577157,0.000088829016,0.00028933378,0.000004727106,0.0000035709554,0.0000046551604,0.0039339685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983591,0.00041297651,0.0004415481,0.00020695425,0.00038021884,0.00019923605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988453,0.0004538376,0.00024360145,0.00020041913,0.00015192547,0.00010495061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066072657,0.00010669366,0.0002270668,0.00010837405,0.0011972666,0.0003088153,0.00037632295,0.00006017853,0.00012707683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000065577704,0.000061753606,0.00009648909,0.00016812181,0.00037461973,0.0007633972,0.000069378715,0.0001674438,0.0000034031502],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062852603,0.0010408822,0.007967576,0.000046765086,0.00035069778,0.00035927384,0.29543853,0.000060025217,0.0049641877,0.67814314,0.009059545,0.0019408306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012593818,0.000108478605,0.07459475,0.00012561862,0.00007536756,0.0000029534003,0.0076875854,0.000041813742,0.00030797863,0.8401841,0.07543299,0.00017900339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010332348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07766612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28775093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007726751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000082447186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93916404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211705068","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2021.1977919","title":"Closing chapters of the past? Rhetorical strategies in political apologies for human rights violations across the world","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Forgiveness and Related Behaviors","field":"Psychology","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"H2020 European Research Council; Universiteit van Amsterdam; Wilfrid Laurier University","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Redress; Human rights; Politics; Political science; Meaning (existential); State (computer science); Transformative learning; Sociology; Law; Political economy; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.048650278286814855,"score_gpt":0.3981279291005753,"score_spread":0.3494776508137605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211705068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944478,0.00014675573,0.000050970142,0.0009325285,0.0010966157,0.00014284476,0.00001038851,0.0000080079135,0.0031640674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984701,5.595746e-7,0.00004851876,0.000022870285,0.00031003263,0.0000067528576,0.0000024256753,0.000011223867,0.0011274646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835086,0.00019712896,0.0006909665,0.00015249856,0.00022298346,0.00038556504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988711,0.00023318372,0.00036411884,0.00027778972,0.0001930189,0.00006079384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030100846,0.00014447037,0.00032143685,0.00011853247,0.0008761863,0.00006822152,0.00036651365,0.00014573039,0.00017451463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000065428594,0.00006793018,0.00031189746,0.0002191375,0.0004387085,0.00013095074,0.000052751246,0.00055620837,0.000002421418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040796567,0.0003090221,0.005042203,0.000010918131,0.00009914486,0.00007047185,0.0024403627,0.000041048665,0.0018027333,0.9897433,0.00036664278,0.000033339198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028790582,0.0005295927,0.3416316,0.00042503575,0.00027556045,0.00029104797,0.0061172224,0.0000100428815,0.007015371,0.62828135,0.01220231,0.00034184795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022802791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035067268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.361462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008247126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67390054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318715574","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2022.2150518","title":"The International Criminal Court at 25","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Criminal court; Criminology; Law; Criminal procedure; Psychology; International law","score_opus":0.035347113593149744,"score_gpt":0.346870822500671,"score_spread":0.3115237089075213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318715574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8737533,0.000021866806,0.000004527588,0.0036201067,0.0023831606,0.0000501733,0.0000028052123,0.000027176078,0.120136864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8634538,0.000014610067,0.00001997317,0.000077403645,0.0021975935,0.0000013061704,0.000003058021,0.0000058062815,0.13422641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819815,0.00008323681,0.00035839927,0.00008543848,0.0010502865,0.00022447137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988423,0.00021692006,0.00029880705,0.00008976004,0.0004527668,0.00009946468],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011192814,0.00007628599,0.00010952271,0.0001461652,0.0029105474,0.00020069418,0.00079830765,0.00004851289,0.0011705647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036171925,0.000043627173,0.00015723731,0.00005400856,0.00028480092,0.00023452715,0.00005726244,0.0001765822,0.00040783375],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021319853,0.000019328458,0.00007404695,9.571339e-7,0.000048923208,0.00008977033,0.0022085067,0.0000026690172,0.000110277,0.9195834,0.07779656,0.000044232896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020813193,0.00004544208,0.0029254835,0.000017950693,0.000015932967,0.000017527615,0.00013357373,0.00000914927,0.00019266455,0.33476174,0.66161376,0.00005863707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013944409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060167885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5848217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002607528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008441957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383555506","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2023.2227206","title":"Human rights, human goods, universality, and colonialism","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Amnesty; Transgender; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.04780599738554387,"score_gpt":0.39784008375797614,"score_spread":0.3500340863724323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383555506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9496252,0.00017878687,0.0000014667028,0.0011593251,0.0012951392,0.00016936984,0.000017968363,0.00008415549,0.047468588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94845957,0.000013238724,0.000016272335,0.0001291319,0.0022489436,0.0000020946911,0.0000141743,0.00003001008,0.04908659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975165,0.00038872243,0.00082716957,0.00029192813,0.0004246,0.0005510621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835354,0.000075417316,0.0006371462,0.00040030558,0.00015870275,0.0003749064],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081442774,0.0002518082,0.00052141375,0.00071880897,0.0020871377,0.00012886166,0.0004990776,0.00025635946,0.0013950417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005009102,0.00020217644,0.00019879271,0.00028930846,0.000324852,0.00028861582,0.000095676485,0.0006334998,0.00033705958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003435936,0.0002850248,0.008839043,0.00016210756,0.00024895396,0.0012017494,0.0036187512,7.209406e-7,0.0007502712,0.6125536,0.37225947,0.000045967616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035703066,0.0011771478,0.3817152,0.00007215032,0.0002926185,0.00036458697,0.0001066286,9.295583e-7,0.000058595866,0.4005507,0.21165906,0.00043209732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107295085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011380665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37287617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013314202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042975298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385949551","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2023.2239273","title":"Transitional justice for the “war on terror?”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"International Law and Human Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Transitional justice; Human rights; Law; Sociology; Terrorism; Economic Justice; Political science; Legal pluralism; Pluralism (philosophy); International law; Legal profession; Legal realism; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05365091166888175,"score_gpt":0.3774631505426517,"score_spread":0.32381223887377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385949551","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94017977,0.00003959279,0.00040676878,0.010934723,0.0028177097,0.0003326602,0.00003113019,0.000055394947,0.04520223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97925675,0.0000035550665,0.00004944278,0.00027211758,0.0029584994,0.0000046809837,0.0000041059598,0.0000065529894,0.01744432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99887073,0.00006251394,0.00024729123,0.00007364303,0.0005728355,0.00017298973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990347,0.00041120424,0.00015573595,0.00006431579,0.00027126982,0.000062766936],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007548634,0.000067056935,0.00010565553,0.00012644831,0.0021392244,0.000051564228,0.0003368505,0.00004469414,0.0004897997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020770472,0.00003665001,0.00018106622,0.00005280583,0.00015451977,0.00015120355,0.0000051717,0.00014418713,0.00009187015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039698654,0.000035933022,0.0000016972302,0.0000043770515,0.000039373655,0.0000192315,0.0037902128,0.000052203097,0.000044875098,0.97265273,0.023289192,0.000030477575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044581434,0.00017338649,0.0009819446,0.000040737763,0.000079877005,0.0000056697054,0.00027349975,0.000039229548,0.00011788593,0.6484614,0.3493055,0.00007503923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004179442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097460527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3260163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064039086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067609275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387334255","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2023.2259420","title":"Contextuality of the strategy of human right to water: Struggle for water access to slum-dwellers in Mumbai, India","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Water Governance and Infrastructure","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Slum; Political science; Appeal; Denial; Legitimacy; Normative; Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Law; Public administration; Psychology; Politics; Population","score_opus":0.038010256353449484,"score_gpt":0.35362700803707936,"score_spread":0.3156167516836299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387334255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99650943,0.00000559397,0.0000032584862,0.00087547116,0.00036687645,0.00043124953,0.000031098774,0.000007268981,0.0017697463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980921,0.0000016193728,0.000015425578,0.000116369076,0.0002745813,0.000005717027,0.000004059664,0.000010365883,0.0014797735],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979182,0.00016300812,0.00076689495,0.00015862414,0.00057628204,0.0004170182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990429,0.00003988119,0.00032286046,0.00020913461,0.00025257285,0.00013259873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009715569,0.00013664126,0.0004133612,0.00021913486,0.0004480207,0.0000848731,0.0010361621,0.00011035209,0.0004886287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019118414,0.000065235115,0.0001927312,0.00023874827,0.00016879033,0.00045502267,0.00012571167,0.00019570092,0.000009166183],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053292845,0.000470205,0.03704659,0.00031305358,0.00037313256,0.00008978637,0.3432764,0.0016747692,0.44325614,0.036583755,0.13569124,0.00069199357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012863936,0.0005417925,0.13851921,0.00022914443,0.000034222277,0.0000018989575,0.002560894,0.0000016520956,0.7268253,0.10110547,0.02864083,0.0002532131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019839222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014794258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3407155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010421384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065807515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8255543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400947528","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2024.2374562","title":"Measuring absence: Narrative obstacles to counting contemporary enforced disappearances in Latin America","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Political Conflict and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Human rights; Narrative; Latin Americans; Politics; Accountability; Amnesty; Political science; State (computer science); CLARITY; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Literature","score_opus":0.06881128595805192,"score_gpt":0.35053604941610866,"score_spread":0.28172476345805675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400947528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476188,0.0008867943,0.000043361993,0.0010014352,0.00035561816,0.000095799565,0.000002842764,0.000021630556,0.049973704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967623,0.00000948922,0.00008507495,0.00012677198,0.000522286,0.0000018404457,2.2935335e-7,0.000006134615,0.0024858837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99854267,0.00010691112,0.00041775184,0.00011878196,0.00054584537,0.00026807105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993506,0.00018374417,0.00015596156,0.000057798305,0.000103255574,0.00014865804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005865862,0.000093186434,0.00023281843,0.00012897531,0.00036949044,0.00017966128,0.00023823853,0.00004384221,0.000096616735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012752846,0.00006877925,0.00008614621,0.00026826223,0.00018774124,0.0005209549,0.000018038141,0.00026452358,0.00002280803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007976512,0.00007583865,0.004472835,0.00007829151,0.00008550634,0.0006038311,0.46897057,0.000058303463,0.004108964,0.5154262,0.004398433,0.0016414176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007513329,0.00039074474,0.04446992,0.003337063,0.00002027713,0.00000824944,0.028943356,0.00014328469,0.0022717186,0.08036531,0.83868426,0.00061446626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030438346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029028377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83428586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014716781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019240502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46013877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401245569","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2024.2380703","title":"One foreign force, two nationalisms: How Chinese nationalism resists external LGBT human rights pressure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Nationalism; Human rights; Ideology; Politics; Sociology; Face (sociological concept); Gender studies; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.027074784018748257,"score_gpt":0.35332230679479826,"score_spread":0.32624752277605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401245569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.867636,0.004112191,0.0002999907,0.0027717126,0.001224487,0.0003463672,0.00005934905,0.00013272055,0.12341715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89190793,0.000009269838,0.00043502302,0.00006407653,0.0058534117,0.000007072307,0.0000160166,0.00002392968,0.10168328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962989,0.0003448499,0.0006657857,0.0002993416,0.0019767908,0.00041433296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806136,0.00031213404,0.00048177005,0.00019728176,0.0006726281,0.00027484968],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00133472,0.00025194944,0.00043643216,0.00046699677,0.0023661412,0.00073279586,0.00070815155,0.00015034089,0.0017097973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047102905,0.0001839714,0.00031024346,0.0003297873,0.00043232806,0.0012067028,0.000053078675,0.00045300752,0.000019134732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018445946,0.00010612188,0.0001192739,0.000047088197,0.00022691036,0.00015640643,0.012366294,0.0000145528265,0.0003363447,0.97333014,0.013218584,0.000059813257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004600208,0.0001283041,0.0015357556,0.00024462806,0.00008191772,0.000027836264,0.00044174097,0.000022951172,0.00009870842,0.68326414,0.31346014,0.00023384704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012590798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052047274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30024156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020076682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001506325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404299876","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2024.2416123","title":"A discursive attempt toward the political economy of homophobia in Nigeria","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"York University","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Political economy; Sociology; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.029734574304540965,"score_gpt":0.35174244657594217,"score_spread":0.3220078722714012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404299876","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9076649,0.0007285259,0.0000114088025,0.014631904,0.00045034185,0.00009595721,0.0000055354903,0.000008561332,0.07640286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975507,0.000004897534,0.000020406667,0.000098588025,0.00086051924,0.000001380701,3.6671707e-7,0.000005704357,0.001457397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988131,0.00019220539,0.0004175561,0.0000868943,0.00023435532,0.00025592488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936867,0.00022814846,0.00013177404,0.000089088986,0.00007843527,0.00010387294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005574275,0.00007631783,0.00023842789,0.000118619355,0.00019235055,0.00010367902,0.0003129745,0.00005075141,0.0004357942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017362961,0.00004201225,0.00013275517,0.00012719166,0.00045054517,0.00021507392,0.00002459987,0.00021367254,0.000010297597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076275683,0.000036139543,0.0004121014,0.000019888177,0.000032646993,0.00006853057,0.10719195,4.0219365e-7,0.000028750717,0.88817483,0.0039817304,0.00004539746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016486265,0.00018953384,0.00097253924,0.00015764976,0.000025394209,0.000013392648,0.11441116,0.0000026473986,0.00017273793,0.7102723,0.17351334,0.000104419334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009478764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031168533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1779025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013330161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016131985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47716412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408960760","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2025.2477493","title":"Intersectionality as method for human rights research: Identifying who is made stateless and how through UN treaty body reviews","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Stateless protocol; Intersectionality; Treaty; Human rights; Political science; Sociology; Law; Gender studies; Criminology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.19329244161996811,"score_gpt":0.5022564356971042,"score_spread":0.3089639940771361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408960760","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9435628,0.001612683,0.008457204,0.005339796,0.0009883047,0.0014095848,0.000016264583,0.000042390868,0.03857099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8753678,0.000372376,0.012213893,0.00039886904,0.0012712082,0.00005383936,0.000009714056,0.000026880345,0.1102854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961953,0.0012811288,0.0007788456,0.00038601394,0.00085299544,0.0005057054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979079,0.00040318718,0.00051935145,0.00023365059,0.00073068886,0.00020527038],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006286863,0.0002253266,0.00067238597,0.0004134709,0.0058585447,0.0005965013,0.00050178164,0.00015472641,0.00063400966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067499794,0.0001439283,0.00027909092,0.0003065765,0.00045860192,0.0007371906,0.00009040121,0.0005192943,0.000009772794],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007133388,0.00014368146,0.00016890388,0.00015740041,0.00029494378,0.00005775705,0.038436297,1.336792e-7,0.00058661925,0.8891486,0.06931775,0.0016166125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053699955,0.0001106955,0.0010560841,0.00032053087,0.00004683979,0.0000069493713,0.0006332782,9.33982e-7,0.0025290053,0.5552273,0.4394092,0.00012223511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022426788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01068605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37009144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041499658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017369443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954357},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412739144","doi":"10.1080/14754835.2025.2530101","title":"Rights education and the children’s university","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Human Rights","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Law; Sociology; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.00851183644336088,"score_gpt":0.2930656046337233,"score_spread":0.2845537681903624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412739144","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95862263,0.00015882535,0.000034789482,0.0020647594,0.00033586126,0.0001147188,6.555821e-7,0.0000067071405,0.038661037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916758,0.00001830946,0.000035099278,0.00006022709,0.00032933662,1.9630015e-7,9.017004e-7,0.0000011417845,0.0078790095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926883,0.00023886678,0.00016357074,0.00006542307,0.00017119836,0.00009208393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946725,0.00008794463,0.0001757737,0.00007546634,0.0001382546,0.000055294702],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004968932,0.00005151413,0.000116387695,0.000117249474,0.0016769086,0.00006797289,0.00017030067,0.00004285565,0.000094117204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011242568,0.000027387801,0.00006342202,0.00012257749,0.0003374479,0.0002180877,0.000013253528,0.0001227808,0.0000031559832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003430076,0.00006549222,0.001737695,0.0000012415342,0.00003724903,0.0000011524585,0.0052016503,9.965047e-7,0.000003577307,0.9870722,0.00543575,0.00040865067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016892876,0.00004607749,0.1220221,0.00008328302,0.00017102757,0.000007682808,0.00042882247,0.000004843053,0.00011687965,0.6048478,0.2704828,0.00009940789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032456592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009326547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38222447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066114444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001415723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}