{"meta":{"query_hash":"27b8360d6bf9","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Information Processing"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/27b8360d6bf9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Information+Processing"},"results":[{"id":"W2090740586","doi":"10.2197/ipsjjip.19.231","title":"Defining and Investigating Device Comfort","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Processing","topic":"User Authentication and Security Systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; Carleton University; Communications Research Centre Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Context (archaeology); Human–computer interaction; Mobile device; Work (physics); State (computer science); Context awareness; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.030430273309762463,"score_gpt":0.250170893830511,"score_spread":0.21974062052074853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090740586","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24010156,0.0034818966,0.67132574,0.0020555293,0.00020551792,0.00034184277,0.00026388446,0.00031960514,0.081904404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95123506,0.00090926065,0.041924197,0.00020036171,0.00005606471,0.00015614516,0.00009392412,0.000055875647,0.0053691957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962263,0.0015252364,0.00031888724,0.00048093146,0.00093080854,0.0005177788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99410325,0.0026003583,0.0008328128,0.0009905905,0.0011243505,0.0003485712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025586735,0.00077900226,0.00046732827,0.0011237325,0.0018234503,0.0057845367,0.0012863739,0.0019010812,0.0037056434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00947442,0.0005968607,0.00093940936,0.0009950935,0.006283673,0.009372501,0.005996864,0.0018455489,0.0005066654],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018688329,0.000077422235,0.010667652,0.00068132963,0.000052751777,0.0010607417,0.033592943,0.0114059895,0.009957318,0.8900867,0.0014389538,0.040791176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008467459,0.0012428596,0.029747788,0.0021840988,0.0002659019,0.0062551945,0.055087544,0.16440299,0.026535109,0.45172712,0.26202443,0.0004423138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038458342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018845621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057845367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019665267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010772245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01426816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2176748244","doi":"10.2197/ipsjjip.23.554","title":"A Model for Adversarial Wiretap Channels and its Applications","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Processing","topic":"Wireless Communication Security Techniques","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Alberta Innovates","keywords":"Computer science; Secrecy; Adversarial system; Adversary; Alice and Bob; Secure communication; Channel (broadcasting); Computer network; Coding (social sciences); Secure coding; Secret sharing; Transmission (telecommunications); Computer security; Theoretical computer science; Cryptography; Telecommunications; Alice (programming language); Encryption; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Information security","score_opus":0.040268984927513296,"score_gpt":0.2779475069577659,"score_spread":0.23767852203025258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2176748244","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068812408,0.00053941057,0.97060454,0.0015350024,0.000103660794,0.0000735253,0.00023331733,0.00013579227,0.019893557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7513026,0.0048818043,0.20057118,0.0011388073,0.0007961271,0.0010519687,0.00063375157,0.00021591038,0.039407883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975327,0.0010023363,0.00012910705,0.0003825507,0.0006802701,0.00027291357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994783,0.003430556,0.0004965951,0.00068445347,0.0004025817,0.00020274456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019075068,0.0012399537,0.000903681,0.001077367,0.0012373556,0.002393339,0.0026317216,0.0035763087,0.0068908585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006818838,0.0006143826,0.0011230957,0.0017004755,0.004057757,0.0058264695,0.0028757765,0.005019178,0.0015883732],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017494262,0.000013602293,0.000043366817,0.00003353849,0.0000061295605,0.000093098795,0.00008749951,0.029926034,0.00043093174,0.9663726,0.0010385663,0.0019371929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000215366,0.000044872988,0.000043263874,0.000039768234,0.000012042942,0.00016665772,0.000050248942,0.30373272,0.0004952098,0.6863922,0.008975656,0.000025828667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021320323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088901084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068908585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021170187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00122161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023052216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2178800862","doi":"10.2197/ipsjjip.23.570","title":"New Secret Sharing Schemes Realizing General Access Structures","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Processing","topic":"Cryptography and Data Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Computer science; Secret sharing; Access structure; Secure multi-party computation; Homomorphic secret sharing; Verifiable secret sharing; Computer security; Computer network; Theoretical computer science; Distributed computing; Cryptography","score_opus":0.04172216416135151,"score_gpt":0.3144399746624166,"score_spread":0.2727178105010651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2178800862","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1450703,0.0012978399,0.8396673,0.0004478671,0.00019417841,0.00023054906,0.0002270691,0.0005036317,0.012361186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8431501,0.00068810344,0.15052591,0.00019025191,0.000099335586,0.00018815092,0.00022953225,0.000032878903,0.004895789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870753,0.00025936557,0.000117750234,0.00020090501,0.00045955915,0.0002549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853337,0.00029477332,0.00023855947,0.00059119536,0.00022320493,0.00011891758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009659624,0.00043803724,0.0007784082,0.0007065985,0.0008291332,0.001348422,0.0012448432,0.00091107853,0.0018312198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016560387,0.00032131246,0.0007425149,0.001117188,0.0012673887,0.0051591974,0.002553016,0.001297088,0.00038997844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055963924,0.00015343464,0.00081668864,0.00036540584,0.00012606922,0.00035563984,0.00067455706,0.032558333,0.08594188,0.76604563,0.0025556118,0.10984722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043183033,0.00067716,0.0009292362,0.000109457156,0.00019626562,0.0015780511,0.00027109,0.3061373,0.088949844,0.55140555,0.049085297,0.0002290024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024313803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022143286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0018312198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074090797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009134906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006126106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3092916815","doi":"10.2197/ipsjjip.28.919","title":"Mad Science is Provably Hard: Puzzles in Hearthstone's Boomsday Lab are NP-hard","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Processing","topic":"Artificial Intelligence in Games","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Generalization; Computational complexity theory; Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03635320821608718,"score_gpt":0.2868326374416269,"score_spread":0.25047942922553973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092916815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77303886,0.000972973,0.06121129,0.01443187,0.00039811886,0.00019755054,0.0012062696,0.0006663842,0.14787674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96624213,0.00037016833,0.017783731,0.0010724831,0.00015281295,0.00016644769,0.00085994106,0.00007402395,0.013278311],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907863,0.00030062627,0.000034406723,0.00021371049,0.00017270283,0.00019993854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926479,0.005536816,0.00042408195,0.00050753256,0.00021514457,0.00066854904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008832024,0.00083346415,0.0009121964,0.00052270264,0.001449589,0.0032753057,0.0015501273,0.001758033,0.009170078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012172028,0.0005252871,0.0012684519,0.00064949825,0.0026883178,0.005246314,0.0030534994,0.005009184,0.0007613389],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008167612,0.00037888446,0.006159942,0.00037413102,0.0001268251,0.00053733785,0.000700375,0.05300369,0.00297527,0.84089553,0.045790013,0.04824127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030043515,0.00021784911,0.005381481,0.00009113506,0.00006223448,0.00047247912,0.000571103,0.15830597,0.0031195208,0.8125288,0.018879263,0.00006976921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036288833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044071455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009170078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018608448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011733377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03067702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155866485","doi":"10.2197/ipsjjip.29.296","title":"Empirical Study on Dependency-related License Violation in the JavaScript Package Ecosystem","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Processing","topic":"Scientific Computing and Data Management","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science","keywords":"License; Dependency (UML); Computer science; JavaScript; Software; MIT License; Computer security; World Wide Web; Software engineering; Empirical research; Artifact (error); Reuse; Operating system; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.10322015682996123,"score_gpt":0.3939907377257572,"score_spread":0.290770580895796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155866485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99870443,0.000049918668,0.0002911573,0.00011186834,0.0000021284,0.000017797945,0.000028044726,0.000002041982,0.0007924914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903905,0.0001187623,0.0004011666,0.000053066047,0.0000045500715,0.000022640193,0.00007130955,0.0000041351273,0.0002853966],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194723,0.0030094928,0.0009590581,0.00073709205,0.0027489976,0.0005982172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8583665,0.08010532,0.042251956,0.0039632507,0.012144753,0.003168228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007814647,0.00021908894,0.00024571456,0.0019234264,0.0011835374,0.0015509268,0.0008750511,0.00074571447,0.0019382198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059751604,0.00036951565,0.0002766159,0.002398049,0.0015207025,0.002813968,0.0015741752,0.0017836917,0.00027216136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043927004,0.00039594373,0.96639663,0.00010660656,0.000019105884,0.0005710476,0.02106131,0.00008219035,0.00041606667,0.00043295932,0.0003520003,0.010122282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071790496,0.00016856633,0.9273489,0.00013157113,0.000033703524,0.0009965233,0.06548346,0.001561048,0.00092334265,0.00035252524,0.0029653588,0.000027880407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005999886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006983466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007814647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001132932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015707331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04132831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213240734","doi":"10.2197/ipsjjip.30.155","title":"Automatic Optimize-time Validation for Binary Optimizers","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Processing","topic":"Software Testing and Debugging Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"IBM (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Binary number; Compatibility (geochemistry); Code (set theory); Binary code; Code coverage; Program optimization; Source code; Dead code; Redundant code; Programming language; Code generation; Set (abstract data type); Operating system; Software; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.01353373715607724,"score_gpt":0.2568205463823833,"score_spread":0.24328680922630602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213240734","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082964346,0.0005748293,0.8142666,0.0003408225,0.0002129387,0.00040916272,0.00044988442,0.096644446,0.0041369926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51448673,0.00018798368,0.46566287,0.0005835468,0.00009211758,0.00050381647,0.0017283541,0.012791767,0.0039628125],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.98821414,0.0035207437,0.0010656219,0.0015936086,0.0045856074,0.0010202345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9696978,0.010447012,0.0041865613,0.010059334,0.0052082036,0.00040114459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045612743,0.002026228,0.0011810737,0.002149395,0.0007700238,0.0018951218,0.0028999285,0.0013002985,0.004225542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024375677,0.0014348474,0.0015602598,0.000952537,0.0013437797,0.0035461765,0.0022833496,0.002111157,0.0016967576],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035383203,0.00094165164,0.034376487,0.0014066285,0.0004174531,0.00084034976,0.0010275071,0.06402336,0.22383447,0.020567141,0.024369316,0.62465733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030099545,0.0008796665,0.0090104565,0.00023656967,0.00023180402,0.00078477245,0.0001226845,0.5781445,0.36983955,0.012085964,0.028073017,0.00028996816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021765365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023432204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0045612743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013480566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024730335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024122596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386729590","doi":"10.2197/ipsjjip.31.550","title":"A Deeper Look into Deep Learning-based Output Prediction Attacks Using Weak SPN Block Ciphers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Processing","topic":"Cryptographic Implementations and Security","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; Banting and Best Diabetes Centre, University of Toronto","keywords":"Computer science; Block cipher; Linear cryptanalysis; Deep learning; Differential cryptanalysis; Cipher; Cryptanalysis; Cryptography; Artificial intelligence; Key (lock); Differential (mechanical device); Theoretical computer science; Algorithm; Computer security; Encryption","score_opus":0.018853698256101815,"score_gpt":0.2874010940473963,"score_spread":0.26854739579129444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386729590","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12595385,0.0008052645,0.8608297,0.0022725838,0.00016061889,0.00012373894,0.00009080898,0.00074962154,0.00901378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9282886,0.0005800674,0.06742238,0.00034600528,0.00008744831,0.00005453515,0.000052488875,0.00007386393,0.0030946503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976948,0.00075579464,0.00012312907,0.00029678986,0.0008573407,0.00027214637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955302,0.0024958737,0.00042710057,0.0010416651,0.00040825194,0.00009696329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029956247,0.0010846133,0.0009321727,0.0010049763,0.000514882,0.0014171988,0.0011233788,0.0013047061,0.0020134673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008517848,0.00049684086,0.0010699603,0.0004516011,0.002775626,0.0051217168,0.0016648498,0.0033961297,0.00036362387],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007364148,0.00028971894,0.005540457,0.00034856703,0.00025243658,0.00040452788,0.00030536865,0.36856034,0.048441928,0.46611795,0.0028693858,0.10613291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017151568,0.00012191914,0.00039055725,0.00003510779,0.000023374432,0.00010917459,0.000017879753,0.9310331,0.015869873,0.051292237,0.0010662954,0.00002334743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006916404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005943134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0029956247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00128084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007842634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015842557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W964026779","doi":"10.2197/ipsjjip.23.392","title":"A Classification of Intrusion Detection Systems in the Cloud","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Processing","topic":"Cloud Data Security Solutions","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Schlumberger Foundation","keywords":"Cloud computing; Computer science; Software deployment; Intrusion detection system; Scalability; Adaptability; Computer security; Architecture; Software engineering; Database; Operating system","score_opus":0.03672456630860296,"score_gpt":0.2766936222549267,"score_spread":0.23996905594632376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W964026779","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2507795,0.13274457,0.490264,0.01579422,0.002676948,0.0020535043,0.0018277715,0.003921945,0.099937655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6435198,0.07169943,0.26761326,0.0017371859,0.0011310027,0.00049335544,0.002506472,0.00020081848,0.011098598],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963767,0.0003744222,0.00060848484,0.00048930594,0.0016944756,0.0004566112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952722,0.0011745151,0.0008602259,0.00055000116,0.0019068362,0.00023619445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016360382,0.0007478444,0.0006252972,0.008963003,0.0012400598,0.0040400666,0.0013645536,0.0013014197,0.0011095068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004695595,0.00030731971,0.0009576355,0.0075683533,0.00090049347,0.0038668665,0.0010000283,0.0012940913,0.00071906584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018564334,0.00033444783,0.0465928,0.0015005989,0.00011011724,0.00060872635,0.0009216945,0.007384411,0.011687953,0.07522316,0.014448436,0.841002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067854,0.00089687837,0.11449531,0.0038036085,0.00039578567,0.008714746,0.004554468,0.3025416,0.03466126,0.082872085,0.44669953,0.00029690028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028157923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021496948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008963003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001447067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013708997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010499239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}