{"meta":{"query_hash":"8f453ced6b16","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences"},"cohort_total":3,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":3,"exported":3,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/8f453ced6b16","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Information+and+Optimization+Sciences"},"results":[{"id":"W1971620553","doi":"10.1080/02522667.2008.10699847","title":"An EOQ model with trade credit period depending on the ordering quantity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic order quantity; Period (music); Trade credit; Economics; Econometrics; Mathematics; Business; Supply chain; Finance; Physics","score_opus":0.04085584998527315,"score_gpt":0.23936975005191988,"score_spread":0.19851390006664674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971620553","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13796577,0.0017211525,0.78410417,0.0035033624,0.000492546,0.00026662368,0.0028173781,0.00057732925,0.068551734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90639377,0.0012480831,0.03546712,0.00024146556,0.00014361848,0.00036112708,0.00067063794,0.000102953505,0.055371232],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990829,0.0002961102,0.000045488247,0.00025733467,0.0001240911,0.00019403645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975975,0.0012495973,0.0004070546,0.000115056886,0.0003549579,0.00027578505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021098484,0.0012100189,0.0018182999,0.0009831566,0.0007761924,0.0036884747,0.002993304,0.0044024363,0.01205972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004596483,0.0010539638,0.00086898025,0.0017782688,0.0020542978,0.0035362039,0.0015425083,0.0027567623,0.0013247757],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017812768,0.000083785875,0.0005535738,0.000103201775,0.000029444163,0.00038879755,0.00006456884,0.87966275,0.00085463707,0.112952694,0.0013140915,0.0038142554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000651728,0.000043297183,0.00014466349,0.000012591346,0.000014670602,0.0000385619,0.000029698069,0.9817966,0.00008894364,0.016632242,0.0011175055,0.000015945468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014511856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005865355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014511856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024199155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019190027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04034376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062466821","doi":"10.1080/02522667.2008.10699807","title":"Retailer's lot-sizing policy under partially funded permissible delay in payments","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences","topic":"Supply Chain and Inventory Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Accounts payable; Economic order quantity; Payment; Order (exchange); Sizing; Rest (music); Economics; Trade credit; Business; Operations research; Microeconomics; Actuarial science; Mathematical economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Finance; Marketing; Supply chain","score_opus":0.04266489329038512,"score_gpt":0.26340343810736977,"score_spread":0.22073854481698466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062466821","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39388493,0.0003734091,0.5935508,0.00059867307,0.00007664199,0.00023600193,0.00037693203,0.00040338776,0.010499277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9652165,0.00012479932,0.032289468,0.0000343816,0.000010746709,0.000036540012,0.00007995623,0.000028054137,0.0021794646],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991648,0.0003033662,0.00005024326,0.00016917994,0.00016462838,0.00014772794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997752,0.0013527179,0.00030663417,0.00018773403,0.00024977012,0.0001511198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020624765,0.0005018258,0.0008915799,0.0003816214,0.0004737974,0.0017412183,0.0011721669,0.0008933277,0.0025685092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054935687,0.0005976383,0.00043937255,0.00050502626,0.0007990429,0.0017467105,0.0005312043,0.0009455191,0.00030497042],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002602157,0.000053387517,0.00058926584,0.00006338196,0.000021807817,0.00007868898,0.00005356239,0.95822006,0.0031718647,0.026217138,0.0005164412,0.010754206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054825432,0.000096552176,0.00052867364,0.0000112242915,0.000012580493,0.00004396043,0.00003805895,0.9756659,0.0025138408,0.020335877,0.0006751858,0.000023261553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002989068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027407517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002989068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018567207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028669476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013471484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084695480","doi":"10.1080/02522667.2012.10700146","title":"Approaching the best while avoiding the worst option: Consumer choice modeling via TOPSIS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"TOPSIS; Ideal solution; Similarity (geometry); Ideal (ethics); Computer science; Order (exchange); Field (mathematics); Marketing; Contrast (vision); Operations research; Mathematics; Economics; Business; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06443764092296299,"score_gpt":0.27155396191793313,"score_spread":0.20711632099497013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084695480","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26659584,0.00033632,0.71929866,0.0013091381,0.000048537146,0.0003584271,0.00019945901,0.00011347115,0.011740137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91790146,0.00022056571,0.079912655,0.000050444123,0.000012181648,0.00028501567,0.00008167464,0.000010233695,0.0015258315],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969825,0.0021303913,0.00009928758,0.00021070357,0.0004293187,0.00014779647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611133,0.0031714877,0.0002314864,0.0000895727,0.0002861189,0.00010998409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003858887,0.00082775846,0.00083769043,0.0013650819,0.0010705298,0.0026612722,0.0012468713,0.0014604242,0.0048720874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057363245,0.00047177053,0.0011673961,0.0023922075,0.0011488223,0.0015412031,0.0015103279,0.0015038133,0.00022469641],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016274495,0.00020116878,0.005792376,0.00021959835,0.00027181348,0.00033794183,0.001404278,0.8785297,0.0009623355,0.077401035,0.0010074701,0.03370944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011777981,0.00006722046,0.00043652722,0.000024157562,0.000021498909,0.000020921167,0.0002554755,0.9794495,0.00010623186,0.019208394,0.00038072656,0.000017648414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009395044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072360756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009395044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020393906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016067061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020408034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}