{"meta":{"query_hash":"2abda70a7dcc","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation"},"cohort_total":54,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":54,"exported":54,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/2abda70a7dcc","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Insect+Conservation"},"results":[{"id":"W10399497","doi":"10.1023/a:1017913210201","title":"Short-term Effects of Harvest Technique and Mechanical Site Preparation on Arthropod Communities in Jack Pine Plantations","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Understory; Ecology; Biodiversity; Biology; Arthropod; Animal ecology; Trophic level; Agroforestry; Canopy","score_opus":0.016218456937696826,"score_gpt":0.25217411836003717,"score_spread":0.23595566142234034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10399497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968668,0.00002733309,0.0022349893,0.00017588779,0.00009275153,0.00040459094,0.0000030486178,0.000009141114,0.00018543746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989272,0.00013607208,0.00075561606,0.00010875817,0.000022341444,0.00001775614,0.000009533164,0.000008211522,0.000014543737],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884313,0.0002747894,0.0004717205,0.00007756941,0.0002338381,0.00009893098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902755,0.0004693173,0.0002961752,0.00013286786,0.000032189044,0.000041903946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006377871,0.00009799049,0.00020692585,0.00013781102,0.000055578825,0.000022716564,0.00009078483,0.00007472391,0.000033629443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014226233,0.000088164146,0.0000341288,0.00020059367,0.00007377328,0.00044935264,0.000029696146,0.00018932093,0.0000054232796],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004003134,0.00032463952,0.60584855,0.000118977085,0.00002033552,0.00004854645,0.0013564747,0.00041178399,0.3881675,0.00015181211,0.00038552692,0.0027655237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007086487,0.0013135767,0.9579237,0.0005626587,0.000017752736,0.00025861038,0.00006719278,0.0041654436,0.03448343,0.00017933766,0.00020824086,0.00011140053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000729721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00433673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35368407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012236799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001547732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35952294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1492605311","doi":"10.1023/a:1009611501133","title":"An Efficient Pit-light Trap to Study Beetle Diversity","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts (Québec); Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Pitfall trap; Trap (plumbing); Animal ecology; Environmental science; Curculionidae; Rainwater harvesting; Ecology; Habitat; Biology; Environmental engineering","score_opus":0.01511969492043587,"score_gpt":0.23101695398836117,"score_spread":0.21589725906792528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1492605311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99710125,0.0000043715327,0.00020272196,0.00055630977,0.00016550199,0.00024782037,7.6471355e-7,0.000011959075,0.0017093109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979085,0.000003576014,0.00041618926,0.0014309009,0.000033801185,0.0000027122003,6.130428e-7,0.000004508078,0.00019921231],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909157,0.000109290006,0.00025285978,0.00012495498,0.00028830717,0.00013301926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995934,0.000023698354,0.00011604044,0.00014266995,0.00002243592,0.00010175503],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060607254,0.00007979538,0.00011790482,0.000067809924,0.00026649653,0.000018606052,0.0002516266,0.000034731915,0.004583568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022033691,0.00006942607,0.000043693966,0.00025316392,0.00003035562,0.00020774409,0.00007675322,0.00010218359,0.00023501391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064554333,0.0028980733,0.90153855,0.0000045764373,0.00007860236,0.00015181697,0.010058258,0.05064418,0.006912438,0.00007383863,0.010280737,0.016713373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059714564,0.0013723064,0.99405193,0.000004192011,0.00003118068,0.000017485143,0.0002439305,0.00054071844,0.0003061918,0.0001329273,0.002618457,0.0000835429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033372288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057223043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09251336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013080164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009918658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598938561","doi":"10.1007/s10841-006-9049-2","title":"David L. Pearson, C. Barry Knisley and C.J. Kazilek. A field guide to the tiger beetles of the United States and Canada. Identification, natural history and distribution of the Cicindelidae","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Animal ecology; Tiger; Natural history; Entomology; Distribution (mathematics); Geography; Ecology; Biology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.011893859597257528,"score_gpt":0.20224745570916208,"score_spread":0.19035359611190455,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598938561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.988215,0.00050393667,0.000057031804,0.010890916,0.00015804688,0.00012830643,0.000034095312,0.0000013886922,0.000011265033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989446,0.00008213994,0.000007988922,0.0008719398,0.000038770922,0.0000010185424,0.000019141813,2.408967e-7,0.00003415934],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992875,0.00007894101,0.00034045987,0.00006495765,0.00015784707,0.00007029836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988856,0.00030687402,0.00037105024,0.000045702123,0.00035823768,0.000032593332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005876426,0.000057416833,0.00008598829,0.000011489575,0.0001455015,0.000017683144,0.0001104717,0.00003439592,0.000007667679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036633774,0.000019093257,0.00002746324,0.00017183406,0.000074287724,0.000079104946,0.00003767463,0.000100963014,3.074793e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035631246,0.000054683253,0.7851456,0.000043089465,0.0000494581,0.0000013114271,0.0009070702,0.000036835154,0.12065163,0.00049487944,0.065579966,0.026679182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009090716,0.00005497194,0.93160826,0.00004830462,0.000018169629,0.000012472864,0.0004825885,0.00008505617,0.005413425,0.000045955545,0.06210377,0.000036098903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10467041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.34914765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24447724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007435945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067788715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90129167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1935942455","doi":"10.1007/s10841-015-9808-z","title":"Road mortality potentially responsible for billions of pollinating insect deaths annually","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":119,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Pollination; Pollinator; Ecology; Biology; Biodiversity; Animal ecology; Abundance (ecology); Geography; Pollen","score_opus":0.21163340334997074,"score_gpt":0.28783899598435725,"score_spread":0.0762055926343865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1935942455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99733144,0.0002504084,0.000077255514,0.0017993494,0.000106231695,0.000120080156,0.00006302971,0.000009864854,0.00024231942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985175,0.000051463994,0.0009619956,0.00018527376,0.00022120113,0.0000024366097,0.000008886084,7.9481697e-7,0.000050448652],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896467,0.00008679747,0.00047616469,0.00008509804,0.00025720612,0.00013009258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815756,0.0002750074,0.0005434401,0.000017447004,0.000938744,0.00006782338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001085582,0.00008579711,0.00022259275,0.00003555902,0.00011660245,0.00002790571,0.00013937967,0.000060210114,0.000009114625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009507721,0.00003477881,0.00013021717,0.00026250427,0.000035491477,0.0002233358,0.000026857624,0.00008112898,7.815992e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007079862,0.00014657632,0.21549763,0.000018249893,0.00009313859,0.00000938747,0.00029209282,0.00003220559,0.7694987,0.0006685996,0.0026780458,0.010357367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039892655,0.0012294962,0.98499185,0.00006676251,0.000039623606,0.000027874034,0.00044504006,0.00016699592,0.008283476,0.0019853485,0.0022668284,0.000097778066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004779769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024034444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76949424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027037046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009436253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14182386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1983045384","doi":"10.1007/s10841-012-9494-z","title":"Apodemia mormo in Canada: population genetic data support prior conservation ranking","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia; Western University; University of Saskatchewan; University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Directorate for Biological Sciences; Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife; Ministry of Environment - Saskatchewan","keywords":"Animal ecology; Threatened species; Population; Geography; Gene flow; Endangered species; Ecology; Biology; Conservation genetics; Microsatellite; Genetic diversity; Demography; Genetics; Habitat","score_opus":0.039015188950781994,"score_gpt":0.25094245792420555,"score_spread":0.21192726897342357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983045384","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973063,0.00029741158,0.0012117949,0.00047838513,0.0005028727,0.00011629418,0.000024705687,0.0000021785868,0.00006006745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952379,0.000056260677,0.0026864295,0.0012379015,0.00028255078,8.2801074e-7,0.00045086304,0.0000095116975,0.000037795147],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987769,0.00010387184,0.00052398717,0.00013116676,0.00028131265,0.00018276657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989569,0.000025517038,0.0004857304,0.00026268698,0.00019133769,0.00007780808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004976669,0.000110117224,0.00016278241,0.00009315598,0.000061487364,0.000018021175,0.00024069213,0.000110572626,0.00004539298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023223448,0.0001114293,0.000034023284,0.00014758875,0.000014742156,0.000051991876,0.00007472352,0.00013239756,0.0000012066394],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010297052,0.000016614007,0.9781456,0.000016651124,0.00002566561,0.0000034918842,0.000082479666,0.000422248,0.012969409,0.000019080664,0.0055328715,0.0026629185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006890824,0.000048909747,0.988906,0.00002001847,0.00003164864,0.00008749555,0.00009040942,0.0005633053,0.0016707489,0.000043184456,0.0077286684,0.0001205136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1303967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28464517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15424849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013065105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007412597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87539405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998250398","doi":"10.1007/s10841-011-9399-2","title":"Study design and mark-recapture estimates of dispersal: a case study with the endangered damselfly Coenagrion mercuriale","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Damselfly; Endangered species; Ecology; Animal ecology; Mark and recapture; Biology; Spatial ecology; Habitat; Odonata; Demography; Population","score_opus":0.03811609484113256,"score_gpt":0.2376631694088474,"score_spread":0.19954707456771484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998250398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970276,0.000032205055,0.0015260547,0.0005609461,0.00008353638,0.00071588403,8.988655e-7,0.000008027374,0.00004485677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777746,0.000004868607,0.0019521378,0.00020110208,0.000022145696,0.000015271364,4.3806455e-7,0.000009045935,0.000017510403],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876493,0.00039921774,0.00036248675,0.00013106815,0.00023729284,0.00010501742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882805,0.00035371853,0.0005472497,0.0001476344,0.00007879906,0.000044519184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013181492,0.000121331876,0.00020336348,0.000052734213,0.0001639837,0.000018452523,0.0001353443,0.00004942807,0.00009662474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012566979,0.000071200026,0.000027815977,0.00021877988,0.00016220789,0.0003763101,0.00004282991,0.00016475294,0.0000020371726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075803755,0.0006447939,0.9735624,0.0000042506213,0.00011258599,0.00045313535,0.022069786,0.0000950815,0.0006724673,0.0000057951447,0.0009884919,0.0006331648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012710019,0.0032476455,0.9776246,0.000016366712,0.00022958532,0.0013516928,0.015201796,0.0005993857,0.0002735396,0.00007237652,0.000021941241,0.00009008398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021205805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034451473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00686799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004427273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004138396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32056975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998934692","doi":"10.1007/s10841-011-9446-z","title":"Edge effects of three anthropogenic disturbances on spider communities in Alberta’s boreal forest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Logging; Disturbance (geology); Biodiversity; Transect; Boreal; Ecology; Geography; Clearcutting; Forest fragmentation; Forest management; Fragmentation (computing); Taiga; Habitat fragmentation; Environmental science; Forestry; Agroforestry; Biology; Geology; Geomorphology","score_opus":0.05108371528683705,"score_gpt":0.2178490198291943,"score_spread":0.16676530454235725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998934692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981958,0.0001604885,0.0000011020059,0.0007630277,0.00019996545,0.000086087966,0.000003473282,0.0000030260042,0.00058699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994985,0.00015147119,0.000034696925,0.00024546066,0.00004604142,0.0000013563902,0.000006115462,3.479644e-7,0.000016014166],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994024,0.00008339747,0.0002564963,0.00005034668,0.000101068465,0.00010626594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891436,0.0006293841,0.00029095914,0.000030661176,0.00011260344,0.00002204075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002047241,0.0000783469,0.00019819743,0.000031463427,0.000107147265,0.0000056026556,0.00016192668,0.00006755912,0.000044996043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013163351,0.000030805655,0.00007860951,0.00014087578,0.00019864234,0.0001409595,0.00003286374,0.00012775893,0.0000029582463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025386093,0.00022330017,0.99565446,0.000017085857,0.00003358331,0.000008930006,0.00068170304,0.000001053874,0.00032528493,0.00037702866,0.00058383134,0.0018398497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027586805,0.00170809,0.9942128,0.00008448169,0.000017910666,0.0000061901865,0.00047337232,0.000008372543,0.0015420783,0.0013475147,0.00026313897,0.000060154267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013854336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21904483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2051905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021285628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000107585765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9927125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999683759","doi":"10.1007/s10841-010-9273-7","title":"Bark-dwelling spider assemblages (Araneae) in the boreal forest: dominance, diversity, composition and life-histories","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Habitat; Ecology; Dominance (genetics); Bark (sound); Animal ecology; Biology; Spider; Deciduous; Species diversity; Indicator species; Geography","score_opus":0.026968445381140148,"score_gpt":0.21203893554783723,"score_spread":0.18507049016669708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999683759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992638,0.00010278391,0.000003634057,0.006722943,0.0002532768,0.000071827904,0.0000030578442,0.0000042420943,0.00020022258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988188,0.000104072446,0.00007561371,0.0008296625,0.00015718643,6.476856e-7,0.000005310676,2.2704927e-7,0.000008480019],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99945235,0.00006967931,0.00017576334,0.00007149592,0.00013693553,0.00009379738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928695,0.00034981192,0.00019148277,0.000020603087,0.00012463712,0.000026504811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054622086,0.00006690599,0.00012669773,0.00002372594,0.0004551937,0.000034953064,0.00014358363,0.00008002961,0.000010961199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001136222,0.000025211662,0.000044163207,0.00013526929,0.00012518621,0.00024178447,0.0000628869,0.00022871135,0.0000012056475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011611611,0.00006008504,0.98980534,0.0000051270144,0.000011324177,0.000017198181,0.00069539674,0.000002959158,0.006609662,0.0005046417,0.001530522,0.00064160407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000217722,0.0002271285,0.9965841,0.000011305911,0.000019352583,0.00003546292,0.00056652003,0.000027512886,0.000109964494,0.000739079,0.001406351,0.000055466113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005599981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010165429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00960543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013110904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009389913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5672548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999770171","doi":"10.1007/s10841-015-9755-8","title":"Marking by elytral clip changes stridulatory characteristics and reduces reproduction in the American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Insect Ecology and Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Nature Conservancy; Augustana College; Idaho State University","keywords":"Stridulation; Biology; Animal ecology; Endangered species; Zoology; Ecology; Orthoptera","score_opus":0.027248654696705465,"score_gpt":0.24521352784509165,"score_spread":0.2179648731483862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999770171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968014,0.00016727537,0.000047607737,0.0024453166,0.00026526122,0.00011767862,0.0000016037692,0.00000568082,0.00014821779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978537,0.00025988327,0.00031453886,0.001411183,0.000110122164,0.0000054610605,0.000003036473,0.000006089096,0.000036002846],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901843,0.0001814707,0.00029285345,0.0001425346,0.00022141721,0.00014331161],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999133,0.000069741014,0.00060894684,0.00011473011,0.000027642922,0.00004596182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013447353,0.00008688862,0.00016605525,0.00007683481,0.000078823905,0.000033169275,0.00013724678,0.000027521968,0.000013942998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002511386,0.00006701756,0.00002139772,0.00031102257,0.00023445301,0.00020157766,0.000042318265,0.0001911643,0.0000032357414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005488935,0.00020380314,0.7904526,0.0000152215025,0.000046695255,0.000074481635,0.0033534635,0.00024374624,0.07648298,0.000031580592,0.03987495,0.08867161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002826575,0.0004802323,0.9879544,0.00001668567,0.000020520554,0.00012368309,0.0009928781,0.00019343317,0.0008092378,0.00015553982,0.008879234,0.00009152586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076964987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021521754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1975018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015720654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022475375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27328968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999773397","doi":"10.1007/s10841-009-9233-2","title":"Movement and habitat selection by Argia vivida (Hagen) (Odonata, Coenagrionidae) in fuel-modified forest","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Banff Centre","funders":"Parks Canada","keywords":"Foraging; Habitat; Biological dispersal; Ecology; Home range; Extinction debt; Environmental science; Canopy; Geography; Tree canopy; Habitat destruction; Biology","score_opus":0.007644661355658807,"score_gpt":0.2053029230833181,"score_spread":0.1976582617276593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999773397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99625385,0.00018225578,0.0010862546,0.0016223439,0.00015890886,0.00025780493,0.0000021441276,0.000012418954,0.00042403748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805856,0.000057085563,0.00039575284,0.0013369068,0.000044675857,0.000004054169,0.0000041085673,0.000008620406,0.00009025365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986184,0.00013613467,0.0005278246,0.00015917081,0.00037128798,0.00018713772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927163,0.00011340379,0.00041016375,0.000086117165,0.000035116744,0.000083571285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008776886,0.00013321814,0.00020468251,0.00010943378,0.00007114958,0.000056816676,0.000112741516,0.00008109969,0.00006417198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012815768,0.00011812775,0.00004401428,0.0002995733,0.00003780516,0.00066350534,0.000020226424,0.00020594336,0.00001692816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018518524,0.00019946566,0.8063323,0.000029032462,0.000016065693,0.000019668147,0.0003306873,0.0010204118,0.16688994,0.00010147834,0.015258504,0.009617242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010586418,0.00063053356,0.9808907,0.000069872156,0.000010944772,0.00005394707,0.00003316655,0.012524082,0.0026148173,0.0010544299,0.0009245845,0.00013429322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011829874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049250512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17455837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003980607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023683124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.481711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006860184","doi":"10.1007/s10841-008-9186-x","title":"Relevance of using a vegetation-based method to conserve urban carabid diversity","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Espace pour la vie; McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Animal ecology; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Diversity index; Geography; Vegetation (pathology); Species diversity; Ecological succession; Landscape ecology; Biodiversity; Biology","score_opus":0.04466619923717858,"score_gpt":0.2720728584512396,"score_spread":0.227406659214061,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006860184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.942471,0.000046893754,0.056491364,0.0005623827,0.00011173345,0.000091914684,0.0000018487315,0.0000047803896,0.00021805076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94210356,0.000009096398,0.056871835,0.000958607,0.00001582385,9.829482e-7,6.909658e-7,0.000004023013,0.000035365418],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905896,0.00014895874,0.00036668018,0.00009403138,0.0002361552,0.00009521362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987984,0.00041183125,0.0004943044,0.00007863263,0.00016770847,0.000049165905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005427313,0.00007465057,0.00019188593,0.00008948899,0.00026237103,0.0000030234587,0.00011929953,0.000048252852,0.000042803615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039931518,0.00007180254,0.00007123112,0.00028898078,0.00012635539,0.00020218134,0.00006555455,0.00010345159,0.000006757604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094804454,0.000049894457,0.9409252,0.000013278529,0.000025717123,0.000012629702,0.001555197,0.045280404,0.011408683,0.000055956487,0.00047976733,0.00009847611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051980186,0.00017414604,0.97122586,0.000037160127,0.00003571642,0.000038912258,0.00006274261,0.024520535,0.0028507612,0.0003294975,0.00012194258,0.000082955274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037501144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004290501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030300634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015876302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000074628755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29280224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021095895","doi":"10.1007/s10841-004-0296-9","title":"Carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) at forest-farmland edges in southern Finland","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Killam Trusts","keywords":"Habitat; Abundance (ecology); Ecology; Animal ecology; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.015248333920738474,"score_gpt":0.2093516263065209,"score_spread":0.19410329238578244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021095895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957164,0.0000731576,0.00018000622,0.0028130715,0.00021019108,0.0001278623,0.0000030076349,0.0000069232024,0.0008694097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977569,0.000027490632,0.0003887023,0.0013922458,0.00008207627,0.000006002943,0.0000037708419,0.000008586453,0.00033422853],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893695,0.00007822531,0.0004552268,0.00013352878,0.00022303472,0.00017306172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993396,0.000104066276,0.00034735285,0.000110163375,0.000040677653,0.000058160647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004537417,0.000116536554,0.00018997845,0.000093379036,0.00010050628,0.000019938008,0.0001479351,0.00015790308,0.00026071433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014083883,0.000101850805,0.000066602784,0.00020940651,0.00009742579,0.00032117256,0.000046039586,0.0002465138,0.00014936758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014523488,0.0000619576,0.98957187,0.000005988572,0.000011479726,0.00003447854,0.0012289158,0.0057963785,0.0018076872,0.000027368778,0.0008050281,0.0005036242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013993653,0.00016514288,0.99479127,0.000045062654,0.000015283355,0.000081081926,0.00014503526,0.000117789044,0.00038445066,0.0019760795,0.00076920504,0.00011022982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001535139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024441365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022906225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038960375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000070731556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99336004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031255143","doi":"10.1007/s10841-012-9475-2","title":"Effects of habitat edges and trampling on the distribution of ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in urban forests","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Trampling; Ecology; Animal ecology; Geography; Habitat; Urban forest; Understory; Vegetation (pathology); Fragmentation (computing); Habitat fragmentation; Ground beetle; Urbanization; Biology; Canopy","score_opus":0.02810310817970844,"score_gpt":0.20876710164711332,"score_spread":0.1806639934674049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031255143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983345,0.0004692228,0.0000025967424,0.0009955951,0.00008798585,0.00008959382,0.000006366789,0.0000013518455,0.000012751379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997529,0.000096305404,0.000008142225,0.00008287011,0.000052364267,0.0000010053866,0.0000036434342,1.7088541e-7,0.000002642434],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995408,0.000073121955,0.0001835669,0.00003733904,0.0000849553,0.000080222606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882376,0.0008133453,0.00022786949,0.0000127483545,0.0001045908,0.00001766291],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029048216,0.000049837923,0.00012793107,0.000014083214,0.000073790034,0.000005774538,0.00005672523,0.000061909304,0.0000027123833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027666203,0.000017699122,0.000038736216,0.00012422632,0.00009216127,0.00012131199,0.00001609184,0.000096499665,3.2316828e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009521459,0.00008293868,0.9857425,0.000019438816,0.000016753726,7.4017163e-7,0.00031079268,0.0000020589073,0.012031294,0.0003850431,0.00027842761,0.001034789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015543365,0.00043410005,0.992629,0.00006757962,0.0000138869555,0.0000035786115,0.00020911437,0.0000071134277,0.0061202864,0.0002618157,0.000067524656,0.000030588046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017837858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010057417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00688647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017937007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004887973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07217492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033423745","doi":"10.1007/s10841-014-9665-1","title":"Recipe for disruption: multiple recent arrivals of megachilid bees in Pacific archipelagos","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Archipelago; Biota; Ecology; Biodiversity; Animal ecology; Pollinator; Geography; Endemism; Biology; Fauna; Threatened species; Pollination; Habitat; Pollen","score_opus":0.08307085367598668,"score_gpt":0.2396011227502316,"score_spread":0.15653026907424492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033423745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967453,0.00014717405,0.000041057974,0.0026712173,0.0000802588,0.00011650773,0.000019183737,0.000004443133,0.00017487438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903643,0.00031861843,0.00031042166,0.00009701974,0.000202761,0.0000039247884,0.000009236535,5.24127e-7,0.000021033837],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919057,0.0000816279,0.00041012766,0.00007465633,0.00013833735,0.00010468503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871236,0.00070284295,0.00035493379,0.000013334303,0.00018619667,0.000030304365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065020344,0.000068714086,0.00020986474,0.000033068114,0.00006519475,0.000014651769,0.00009822502,0.00004066354,0.00001647059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00064393703,0.000027332962,0.00008113328,0.00019492256,0.000028965722,0.000108372806,0.000013206481,0.00007542142,7.14141e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046924624,0.00010719143,0.44979516,0.000018298166,0.000017374758,9.566501e-7,0.0002612645,0.000009847401,0.4904114,0.00027064592,0.00057441235,0.058064204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039885912,0.00068554736,0.9730421,0.000096449,0.000009107854,0.000009412376,0.00033131702,0.00025786832,0.005752657,0.0015570811,0.017785532,0.00007408816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049430455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001892635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5232469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015877264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007814137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11146059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045657614","doi":"10.1007/s10841-014-9621-0","title":"Survival of cold-adapted species in isolated mountains: the population genetics of the Sudeten ringlet, Erebia sudetica sudetica, in the Jeseník Mts., Czech Republic","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Biological dispersal; Ecology; Woodland; Biology; Genetic diversity; Population; Animal ecology; Biodiversity; Gene flow; Vicariance; Refugium (fishkeeping); Geography; Habitat; Phylogeography","score_opus":0.038854640334539656,"score_gpt":0.24026707073049386,"score_spread":0.2014124303959542,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045657614","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946511,0.00004922959,0.000068282934,0.0037201399,0.00015381702,0.0002354065,0.00001607709,0.0000035796427,0.0011023714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994545,0.00007827088,0.000025542698,0.00035040843,0.000033130513,0.000003728439,0.000009456113,0.000007828631,0.00003710985],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774444,0.0005339572,0.0007862094,0.00011300157,0.0006453635,0.00017705582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983917,0.00039969452,0.0007424064,0.00032033597,0.00011825281,0.000027635286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018731263,0.000114202536,0.00022766124,0.00008005891,0.00008582009,0.00004012555,0.0005179054,0.00008622798,0.00065891875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079512777,0.0000660966,0.000095757016,0.0008525475,0.00023306251,0.00015580826,0.00008702844,0.00026316132,0.000003663194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099433026,0.00014627166,0.96868795,0.000013270193,0.000011539369,0.0000014044095,0.0010248411,0.00041904225,0.025361143,0.003382531,0.0005758777,0.0002767004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052678515,0.00013456367,0.99036574,0.000045660163,0.000018389188,0.000011134639,0.0013275419,0.0024310893,0.0017635431,0.00029497553,0.0030098055,0.00007078266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012972296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010614372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0235976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024537972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029425515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7214698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2058911126","doi":"10.1007/s10841-006-9014-0","title":"The effects of forestry on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in boreal forests","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":158,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Killam Trusts; University of Alberta","keywords":"Generalist and specialist species; Ecology; Habitat; Taiga; Animal ecology; Biodiversity; Forest management; Old-growth forest; Ecological succession; Clearcutting; Secondary forest; Habitat fragmentation; Vegetation (pathology); Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.0113042078070053,"score_gpt":0.19585949345186665,"score_spread":0.18455528564486134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2058911126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99701685,0.00022976182,3.7672783e-7,0.0021161071,0.00020566522,0.00010528245,0.00000342593,0.0000035810601,0.0003189807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996008,0.0000826079,0.000015262256,0.00015269051,0.00011355388,0.0000019869667,0.0000035298262,3.0418346e-7,0.00002922032],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993196,0.00007365584,0.00027425712,0.00006465984,0.00014823441,0.00011960139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998706,0.00082819717,0.00028342791,0.000033294018,0.00013249139,0.000016635078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024679216,0.000071585564,0.00014852379,0.000023043644,0.00014778147,0.000013899515,0.00017829763,0.00009778516,0.000002339453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026499623,0.000024491657,0.000080490805,0.0001616915,0.00009873404,0.000079502286,0.00002892238,0.00016155257,0.0000011725473],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017154211,0.00007354946,0.9914507,0.000011457836,0.00001478216,0.000017430746,0.000038585044,0.000013598677,0.0031497173,0.00039530918,0.0028050477,0.0018582381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028602922,0.0008010971,0.9938033,0.000054852902,0.00001106192,0.0000062866043,0.000066562876,0.000009253977,0.0025975427,0.0019166948,0.0004016957,0.000045613127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001516417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018113138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016596721,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033023265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014774095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067110504","doi":"10.1007/s10841-011-9403-x","title":"Community assembly of Diptera following restoration of mined boreal bogs: taxonomic and functional diversity","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Bog; Ecology; Trophic level; Species richness; Species evenness; Biology; Sphagnum; Biodiversity; Restoration ecology; Abundance (ecology); Species diversity; Ecosystem; Peat","score_opus":0.05934828387612769,"score_gpt":0.218504552356796,"score_spread":0.1591562684806683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067110504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99775517,0.000009835874,0.00077027996,0.000083336345,0.00010902334,0.000044361506,0.0000029268494,0.0000020357693,0.0012230052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903417,0.0000099929475,0.0008476648,0.00007037092,0.000014318471,4.7439735e-7,0.000005939225,0.0000020287303,0.000015026297],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935067,0.00012303672,0.000296823,0.000043993055,0.00012797363,0.000057533856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993202,0.000085020816,0.00045292222,0.00007165618,0.000037678037,0.000032534856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005500173,0.000051540326,0.00015102318,0.0000567797,0.00011593082,0.000003845217,0.00007942119,0.000047111287,0.000060048063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000086381966,0.000045323293,0.00005415659,0.0000697618,0.00006947389,0.00032271098,0.00009638948,0.00010848211,6.1329524e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002275233,0.00008663053,0.97301555,0.000006805263,0.000027067275,0.000002211673,0.00080194237,0.000012262039,0.024613902,0.000036844707,0.0008101721,0.00035911624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062888407,0.00040675834,0.9962241,0.000015666596,0.00003241092,0.000013053447,0.00012697396,0.00024099677,0.0018628087,0.0003402059,0.000068384405,0.000039724117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032433143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011144164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02320861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005855662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021450644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49029425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074491443","doi":"10.1007/s10841-012-9505-0","title":"Small sample, substantial contribution: additions to the Honduran hawkmoth (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) fauna based on collections from a mountainous protected area (Cusuco National Park)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Espace pour la vie","funders":"","keywords":"Fauna; Biodiversity; Lepidoptera genitalia; Ecology; National park; Geography; Invertebrate; Animal ecology; Taxon; Sphingidae; Biology","score_opus":0.03523354130272784,"score_gpt":0.23595319617798358,"score_spread":0.20071965487525573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074491443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89320177,0.00016768224,0.09490372,0.007256717,0.0008774943,0.0007868975,0.00076336536,0.00002048152,0.0020218638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99097794,0.000014859711,0.0024086514,0.0044392315,0.0013320632,0.000094968214,0.0006774696,0.000012956767,0.000041835818],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984888,0.00030357187,0.0005011734,0.00018813484,0.0002394577,0.00027885515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978921,0.00040968054,0.00042833402,0.00020383747,0.0009305426,0.00013553047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006823119,0.00019503933,0.00021359784,0.00016754749,0.00046945547,0.00006833593,0.00020218325,0.00020593137,0.00016946194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017446679,0.00014746726,0.00017280361,0.00036925662,0.000073877185,0.00002831497,0.00002480152,0.00029976113,0.0000115876755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02214774,0.0058417227,0.5213481,0.00008049222,0.0032473335,0.000055147895,0.0024454044,0.01690215,0.25641435,0.0044638733,0.14659497,0.020458704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006459538,0.0028323578,0.17691347,0.0002671207,0.0002794347,0.00019202358,0.00022196944,0.003898316,0.04875166,0.00069782755,0.7585332,0.0009531017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022891545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00060310523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61193824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013247297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041629342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60135406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081296808","doi":"10.1007/s10841-013-9566-8","title":"Mating success and oviposition of a butterfly are not affected by non-lethal tissue sampling","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Animal Behavior and Reproduction","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Butterfly; Mating; Animal ecology; Zoology; Insect; Reproductive success; Ecology; Insemination; Sperm; Demography; Population; Botany","score_opus":0.03047537447798496,"score_gpt":0.244202544939683,"score_spread":0.21372717046169804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081296808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979308,0.000072723094,0.00012944036,0.0016200691,0.000094046285,0.00012576874,0.000006608588,0.000007385074,0.000013108242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993543,0.0000175784,0.00033042484,0.0000983162,0.00016589924,0.0000026614382,0.00001086937,8.1314346e-7,0.000019138193],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930805,0.00005137356,0.00031114486,0.0000944627,0.00015383642,0.000081154176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990303,0.00007763985,0.000514254,0.000020999638,0.0003189565,0.000037844202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023624978,0.00006976649,0.00014901868,0.00001973922,0.000089722234,0.000046959292,0.000057951824,0.00006575876,0.000058074755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070559385,0.00002979014,0.00003460291,0.00014038994,0.0000313955,0.000361501,0.000013857949,0.000106522326,0.0000016405329],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002767174,0.0000549928,0.05460974,0.0000150602245,0.000005465084,8.5478274e-7,0.00006057061,0.0000015239867,0.931453,0.0000021606957,0.0002353379,0.013533621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012855983,0.00034114573,0.83547413,0.00008164838,0.00001547674,0.00005847945,0.00014310429,0.000058684796,0.16357774,0.000032842592,0.00003316406,0.00005503844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083209283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000034267967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78086436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016260004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000052731516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1257881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085002985","doi":"10.1007/s10841-014-9620-1","title":"Effect of deadwood management on saproxylic beetle richness in the floodplain forests of northern Italy: some measures for deadwood sustainable use","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Infrastructure Canada; Ministero dell'Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare","keywords":"Species richness; Ecology; Riparian forest; Coarse woody debris; Biodiversity; Biotope; Habitat; Basal area; Woodland; Forest management; Riparian zone; Forestry; Geography; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.018634574630115072,"score_gpt":0.21553928791140045,"score_spread":0.1969047132812854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085002985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9983925,0.000053681968,0.000010541005,0.0010382892,0.000057565332,0.000388815,0.000007946984,0.0000032501662,0.00004741751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967366,0.000018783172,0.00003186327,0.00017960402,0.000047072688,0.000009696328,0.0000064149162,6.427464e-7,0.000032233907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990108,0.00024466382,0.00030419164,0.00008507645,0.00020492714,0.00015031673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981358,0.0011806943,0.00037564526,0.00004376647,0.00024693986,0.000017149872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016862168,0.00009257728,0.00024530923,0.00005633321,0.00013520196,0.000015821019,0.00021781502,0.00006552054,0.000002658763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004856935,0.000032992397,0.00011854381,0.00022450445,0.00006503851,0.00017489138,0.00003193438,0.00008203273,7.9423853e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011368954,0.00024136047,0.9885537,0.00017261175,0.00010423304,0.000008408073,0.00030221354,0.000106553525,0.0022712701,0.0021229265,0.0005208145,0.0044590365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000827061,0.0042614676,0.98715913,0.00006300721,0.00007251108,0.0000043364475,0.00058931834,0.000039696664,0.004661465,0.0016032442,0.0006501349,0.000068629175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019529412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002519314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0043904074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031624077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008332438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14058363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088894915","doi":"10.1007/s10841-011-9422-7","title":"A preliminary assessment of changes in plant-dwelling insects when threatened plants are translocated","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Department of Environment and Conservation","funders":"Australian Research Council","keywords":"Threatened species; Biology; Species richness; Ecology; Biodiversity; Near-threatened species; Endangered species; Conservation-dependent species; Habitat","score_opus":0.05501129439386333,"score_gpt":0.24913770959847548,"score_spread":0.19412641520461216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088894915","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997909,0.00007432072,0.0006398947,0.00039971495,0.00011117043,0.00011960743,0.000005555237,0.000005408419,0.0007353192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973964,0.000182421,0.0021710515,0.00020653859,0.000010226951,0.000005563857,0.0000040842074,0.0000055708024,0.000018150582],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913305,0.0000961538,0.00039660058,0.00009252995,0.00016430521,0.000117349155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999199,0.00011496305,0.0005534629,0.00006460654,0.000038582086,0.00002941762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045716995,0.00008867956,0.00021978929,0.00013165896,0.000050463717,0.0000036376618,0.000116819494,0.00007544328,0.0001420101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003749374,0.00007645792,0.00003417032,0.000121292906,0.00007605461,0.0001963645,0.00002198541,0.00015150015,0.0000021958133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029702875,0.00017482453,0.98855007,0.000027624874,0.00003822378,0.00004399759,0.004968825,0.00074392173,0.0047051506,0.00004531171,0.00007987214,0.000325139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000654217,0.00049224077,0.9877726,0.00013213881,0.000020175044,0.000037917813,0.00040287554,0.0064070188,0.0027715026,0.001225577,0.000009805247,0.00007397234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027850998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005366806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005663097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007997083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029486557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31178635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099370232","doi":"10.1007/s10841-008-9137-6","title":"Introduced and native ground beetle assemblages (Coleoptera: Carabidae) along a successional gradient in an urban landscape","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Ordination; Animal ecology; Ecology; Ground beetle; Species richness; Fauna; Biodiversity; Disturbance (geology); Intermediate Disturbance Hypothesis; Habitat; Species diversity; Geography; Community structure; Biology","score_opus":0.033107248791469576,"score_gpt":0.2238695788560762,"score_spread":0.19076233006460663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099370232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972382,0.00017447794,4.0605477e-7,0.0023424334,0.00012237877,0.00006592132,0.0000044877324,0.0000052739088,0.00004637294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937034,0.00009987181,0.00003728557,0.0003084702,0.00015231794,0.0000013213571,0.000009577377,3.027057e-7,0.000020517631],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993407,0.000098710305,0.00021359959,0.00010790297,0.00013243496,0.000106655076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999385,0.00017747922,0.00017960124,0.000016705766,0.00019586163,0.000045380675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026018365,0.00007548357,0.00016002684,0.000041733583,0.00023003956,0.00001945117,0.00008587029,0.00006368403,0.000026257743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010394586,0.000031821102,0.000034907174,0.00017632646,0.000079886304,0.00035502977,0.000030392184,0.00013322837,0.000001171541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114855204,0.000091161965,0.9931173,0.0000026466491,0.000015106495,0.00004547452,0.00070611766,0.000002239539,0.0044469098,0.000036407302,0.0008831237,0.00053868885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033433305,0.0006486924,0.99774545,0.00001741192,0.000007869421,0.00006975986,0.00054183416,0.000039677212,0.0002449691,0.000114395705,0.00016673631,0.00006887211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035965478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072293687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068697142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028741182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017850056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40341574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123006965","doi":"10.1007/s10841-005-0612-z","title":"Fecundity determines the extinction threshold in a Canadian assemblage of longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal ecology; Ecology; Habitat; Habitat fragmentation; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biology; Longhorn beetle; Fecundity; Habitat destruction; Endangered species; Extinction debt; Biodiversity; Fragmentation (computing); Population","score_opus":0.03064351521300282,"score_gpt":0.21909243311108023,"score_spread":0.1884489178980774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123006965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9908006,0.000102908845,4.951994e-7,0.008421677,0.00012731859,0.00008756462,0.000006045574,0.0000030778249,0.00045026495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902475,0.000060822316,0.00002670923,0.0006935954,0.00015074073,0.0000012380436,0.0000031273123,2.6137945e-7,0.000038784772],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935484,0.000063065374,0.00027274527,0.00006529899,0.00010916063,0.00013486485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993399,0.00016937118,0.00025763386,0.00002522121,0.00016593206,0.00004197058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048249227,0.00006607584,0.00013728345,0.00004191519,0.00016270054,0.000018482553,0.00013854167,0.0001015579,0.00006797006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012405688,0.00002451632,0.00006788508,0.00020754716,0.000065572065,0.00020533895,0.000018468654,0.00016257283,0.0000035441171],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007519726,0.000045844816,0.9850158,0.0000034404031,0.000016208864,0.000008078885,0.0001671076,0.000023501145,0.008182231,0.000025203206,0.00096424646,0.0054731504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015731921,0.00021408962,0.9945875,0.000017502522,0.000012574051,0.000018573694,0.0001990916,0.000111195244,0.0011819287,0.00011811679,0.0033344564,0.000047673988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03679615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8773712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84057504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081126585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004046175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9696179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151790806","doi":"10.1007/s10841-006-9021-1","title":"The decline of native coccinellids (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) in the United States and Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Insect-Plant Interactions and Control","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Emerging Frontiers","keywords":"Coccinellidae; Animal ecology; Ecology; Biology; Introduced species; Invasive species; Entomology; Predator; Predation","score_opus":0.011917440192174061,"score_gpt":0.2070135332605403,"score_spread":0.19509609306836626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151790806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98896766,0.00015504146,0.000009079291,0.010526116,0.00008649429,0.00008551014,0.000016472786,0.0000013768991,0.00015227916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99814296,0.00021862771,0.00000837203,0.0014564906,0.00010196865,0.0000021457558,0.000021813206,3.6372526e-7,0.000047265727],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991662,0.00013836942,0.0003853357,0.000046265595,0.00017633541,0.00008748948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978701,0.0014167704,0.00034248675,0.000023958244,0.00033288638,0.000013786983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045948246,0.000063132946,0.00011276169,0.000021701993,0.00012965698,0.00004407136,0.0001297551,0.00002445528,0.000011259934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008009308,0.00001809196,0.000028792023,0.00024438545,0.000029020333,0.000075377546,0.00000867946,0.00013516616,1.10393636e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018875943,0.00039553497,0.8036537,0.000025911371,0.00012513305,0.0000941963,0.00087668246,0.0016084479,0.11855784,0.004112157,0.054279666,0.014383112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041117842,0.00027194788,0.9506636,0.000042384567,0.00001423042,0.00007476882,0.0015183833,0.002105301,0.001280403,0.00087737665,0.0426757,0.00006471441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6859161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9159218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2300057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029791365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047084817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3161754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2405916401","doi":"10.1007/s10841-016-9876-8","title":"Summer floods shape meadow butterfly communities in a floodplain nature reserve in Central Europe","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"AGE-WELL","keywords":"Floodplain; Butterfly; Ecology; Species richness; Geography; Abundance (ecology); Flood myth; Levee; Animal ecology; Temperate climate; Habitat; Biology","score_opus":0.024167305711025093,"score_gpt":0.24967935284409157,"score_spread":0.22551204713306647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2405916401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991279,0.00014694127,0.00008008981,0.0071687317,0.00019805353,0.00008365309,0.0000038175226,0.000004870801,0.0010348607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751985,0.00029404456,0.00038309154,0.0016152986,0.000028633443,0.0000022955194,0.0000023706975,0.0000074027257,0.00014699686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986933,0.00035592905,0.00046615142,0.00008357894,0.00018747867,0.00021357492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991736,0.00037013437,0.00025520023,0.00010610019,0.000057511035,0.000037446374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009112894,0.00009973795,0.00018208976,0.00014666925,0.000061180916,0.000014209571,0.00021693406,0.000119125376,0.00034945775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038687568,0.00007087447,0.00003942396,0.00031258666,0.000149725,0.0005007825,0.00008164878,0.0004185094,0.000025470068],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011593267,0.00008069939,0.99367046,0.000006148331,0.0000130854505,0.000032992597,0.001245684,0.00026037457,0.002416572,0.00020247031,0.0011837805,0.0007717871],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010461193,0.00012285254,0.99412966,0.00012937744,0.000006163875,0.000023058323,0.0002645853,0.0018563409,0.00020826673,0.00093939103,0.0011827397,0.00009147617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044834634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046758767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046310417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020475844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035246452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2437679444","doi":"10.1007/s10841-016-9884-8","title":"Habitat type plays a greater role than livestock grazing in structuring shrubsteppe plant–pollinator communities","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Pollinator; Ecology; Forb; Species richness; Grazing; Grassland; Biodiversity; Conservation grazing; Plant community; Biology; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Pollination; Threatened species; Agroforestry; Pollen","score_opus":0.07021316321782645,"score_gpt":0.21076680424173494,"score_spread":0.1405536410239085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2437679444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9985738,0.0002283824,8.369035e-7,0.0009171688,0.000075935,0.00005071065,0.000021642227,0.000010092755,0.000121446436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99950695,0.00016070688,0.000043210308,0.000119592856,0.00013071796,0.0000011280442,0.0000033343413,8.427846e-7,0.00003352573],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993095,0.000076408614,0.00027452095,0.000057770005,0.0001346625,0.00014714705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932134,0.00032050043,0.00020362738,0.000015372389,0.00010408467,0.00003504604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021639466,0.00009335459,0.00017306805,0.000036475965,0.00012938367,0.00003556943,0.0001455361,0.000050316496,0.000029005441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006310962,0.00003052681,0.000048864807,0.00013002589,0.000037007143,0.0002622643,0.000036279333,0.00011154615,0.0000045613547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017205952,0.000012843204,0.7968642,0.0000036689644,0.000013243335,0.000010462672,0.0003515849,9.104204e-7,0.20096545,0.00008061765,0.00011126448,0.0014136959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002378022,0.00038190227,0.9926647,0.00023400813,0.0000061729406,0.000059103724,0.0009131014,0.000017250508,0.0043068454,0.00053269765,0.00055669254,0.00008970984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038403302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014836796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19665861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036408546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010566363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82792807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519727293","doi":"10.1007/s10841-016-9910-x","title":"Enhancing bark- and wood-boring beetle colonization and survival in vertical deadwood during thinning entries","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; New Brunswick Innovation Foundation","keywords":"Snag; Thinning; Bark beetle; Bark (sound); Coarse woody debris; Colonization; Basal area; Mountain pine beetle; Dendroctonus; Biology; Girdling; Ecology; Habitat","score_opus":0.017281075191229525,"score_gpt":0.2000541956533248,"score_spread":0.18277312046209526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519727293","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969803,0.00014337228,0.000009556396,0.0027192237,0.00009105612,0.000037755526,0.0000014762472,0.000005548703,0.000011702152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99958056,0.00022010661,0.000058925525,0.00006506698,0.000060771305,4.4652978e-7,5.449632e-7,2.9900283e-7,0.000013256501],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995139,0.00005430041,0.00018004712,0.00007274658,0.000081250466,0.000097726996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948883,0.00031178226,0.000077832745,0.000009608295,0.0000830462,0.000028916707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029587036,0.000052234354,0.0001139487,0.000024511935,0.00015787187,0.000021500206,0.00003681363,0.000054283857,0.000014572767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034030763,0.000020319547,0.000015400004,0.000100938014,0.00006103612,0.0002596102,0.000041345655,0.00006426419,7.544564e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008554119,0.000011866793,0.7969541,0.000006137479,0.000009208451,0.000009826485,0.00019485396,4.0548574e-7,0.20186432,0.000096283635,0.000008140434,0.00075934205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003529404,0.00015985414,0.98536474,0.000078018726,0.000008570779,0.000025376296,0.00029151855,0.0000070513206,0.013411236,0.00017640673,0.00007491323,0.000049393224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000046823276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010090423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18845308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028871551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008142639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12142386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2765106433","doi":"10.1007/s10841-017-0001-4","title":"Species distribution model for the ‘Northern’ Oak hairstreak (Satyrium favonius ontario) with comments on its conservation status in the northeastern United States","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Butterfly; Lycaenidae; Animal ecology; Geography; Range (aeronautics); Ecology; Rare species; Population; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Habitat; Distribution (mathematics); Conservation status; Biology; Demography","score_opus":0.09902167854909955,"score_gpt":0.2485879379621213,"score_spread":0.14956625941302176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2765106433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672283,0.000043517506,0.00014137127,0.031776313,0.00013001861,0.00045464546,0.00014943305,0.0000059797617,0.00007041886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99724686,0.000116110925,0.000024465324,0.0022248705,0.0000980377,0.00003391171,0.00007846488,0.0000013120048,0.00017594299],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897057,0.00009683487,0.00036356624,0.00012013725,0.00022904252,0.00021986032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783677,0.00076675805,0.0007558884,0.00009839255,0.00050850783,0.000033691114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005950322,0.00014429443,0.00019074696,0.000018862529,0.0009201841,0.00018721682,0.0003275615,0.000058895424,0.000008443699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021482942,0.00004546741,0.00007088491,0.00010982176,0.00013084544,0.00027992277,0.000027619042,0.00021198127,0.0000011594923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00088115945,0.00016307896,0.99360305,0.000007516289,0.000086957996,0.000004461023,0.00052558683,0.0021286681,0.00025954613,0.00012312779,0.0013067082,0.0009101212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007078983,0.0007074612,0.9591578,0.000047565787,0.0000390003,0.000007733378,0.0016440894,0.017915327,0.000044456992,0.0002550962,0.01937898,0.00009459688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075686593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70991504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7023464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002041372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007417888,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807719924","doi":"10.1007/s10841-018-0071-y","title":"Monitoring bee populations: are eusocial bees attracted to different colours of pan trap than other bees?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Monsanto (Canada); Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; Research and Development Corporation of Newfoundland and Labrador","keywords":"Eusociality; Halictidae; Apidae; Hymenoptera; Pollinator; Biology; Apoidea; Animal ecology; Zoology; Ecology; Megachilidae; Pollination; Pollen","score_opus":0.1655006443266547,"score_gpt":0.2828387585184899,"score_spread":0.11733811419183518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807719924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976955,0.000092998,0.000004872169,0.0018901285,0.00014736422,0.00008792725,0.000027092196,0.000010521601,0.000043565364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987656,0.000030176672,0.00008273815,0.00012788021,0.00095593295,0.0000020098553,0.0000015393447,9.295668e-7,0.000033223816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919045,0.000053909844,0.00033726034,0.00007707599,0.00022010051,0.00012121731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904275,0.00011820925,0.0004448564,0.00000879076,0.00033696863,0.000048395897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016106149,0.000089183806,0.00021111345,0.000027381824,0.0001804244,0.00002898703,0.00011740159,0.00005828819,0.000034120378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014377524,0.000036834866,0.000087383334,0.00020261813,0.00003925948,0.0001230648,0.000018811676,0.0000811696,0.0000026326456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009527314,0.000050838476,0.5644523,0.000002431362,0.000019523095,8.8011205e-7,0.00019438681,3.7496463e-7,0.43156478,0.00002426835,0.00029198482,0.0033029686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012138859,0.0006112165,0.98095626,0.00013655757,0.000020643894,0.000004305466,0.00045855233,0.0000048927463,0.016863856,0.00020549414,0.00054186705,0.00007497972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040803885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006887011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41650394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031111013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007726697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3843114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W285486275","doi":"10.1023/a:1013397410297","title":"Use of Terrestrial Invertebrates as Indicators of the Ecological Sustainability of Forest Management under the Montreal Process","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Coarse woody debris; Ecology; Indicator species; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Sustainability; Animal ecology; Invertebrate; Temperate rainforest; Biodiversity; Forest management; Sustainable forest management; Ecosystem; Agroforestry; Geography; Biology","score_opus":0.03241531669908539,"score_gpt":0.23041482736072455,"score_spread":0.19799951066163915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W285486275","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99412906,0.000019932164,0.0000013176827,0.005486309,0.00008404528,0.00020584177,0.000005326524,0.0000021563133,0.00006597971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996346,0.00006335785,0.000007810386,0.00023536164,0.000027048065,0.0000016011398,0.0000016809959,2.3470487e-7,0.00002828548],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991443,0.00014465873,0.0003622339,0.0000655872,0.00019316922,0.00009003895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986388,0.00037830498,0.00067244243,0.000041990905,0.0002501031,0.000018349661],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038255932,0.000064639244,0.00017406575,0.00002367974,0.00013215096,0.0000078359235,0.00025063436,0.00007316418,0.000033104505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033194156,0.000018354678,0.00011421415,0.0003716068,0.0003620227,0.00012231563,0.00007687125,0.00009995018,2.3680002e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035444432,0.0002100837,0.99690735,0.000015460953,0.00007454463,0.0000027701071,0.00013706273,0.00012683608,0.00025804987,0.00033432164,0.00047050777,0.001108581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022026835,0.00052780006,0.9917742,0.000016640608,0.000050745464,0.0000059848103,0.0018926228,0.000023506833,0.00057489774,0.0047194534,0.00016185165,0.00003204941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076828914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036633005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055055283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003107216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037207796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20442076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2936459194","doi":"10.1007/s10841-019-00152-y","title":"Incorporating citizen science, museum specimens, and field work into the assessment of extinction risk of the American Bumble bee (Bombus pensylvanicus De Geer 1773) in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation","keywords":"IUCN Red List; Animal ecology; Endangered species; Wildlife; Citizen science; Critically endangered; Conservation status; Ecology; Geography; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Biodiversity; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.017460152392520814,"score_gpt":0.21128271110622945,"score_spread":0.19382255871370863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2936459194","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974428,0.00005265537,0.0000017999727,0.0022186234,0.00006127737,0.000078578036,0.0000026053028,9.958505e-7,0.00014070349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995033,0.00009300896,0.00013148494,0.00022311801,0.00004037803,7.0151134e-7,2.4000568e-7,3.6195576e-7,0.000007386831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922746,0.00008594285,0.00027799362,0.00006603044,0.000251425,0.000091130205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986587,0.00041460883,0.0007427288,0.000019178338,0.00014500595,0.00001976958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007275716,0.00005298888,0.00015123283,0.00001663503,0.00012454214,0.000017661148,0.00015409647,0.000013640843,0.000010389348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016644082,0.000017534325,0.000030174573,0.00049145217,0.00008901439,0.00008718673,0.000053249365,0.00014159313,7.0436116e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003079005,0.0000077693285,0.78992945,0.000002693485,0.0000068255845,5.5924306e-7,0.000086627435,0.000024017876,0.20664275,0.000024023906,0.0000970736,0.0031474193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008681855,0.00020460799,0.9939398,0.000056252313,0.000009215191,0.000005251864,0.0010942335,0.00021938702,0.0040452667,0.00019638661,0.000106583735,0.000036155165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31803414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6983989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38036475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010303841,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019634921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6865071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978877462","doi":"10.1007/s10841-019-00179-1","title":"Accounting for imperfect detection in species with sessile life cycle stages: a case study of bumble bee nests","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Division of Environmental Biology; Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program","keywords":"Animal ecology; Nest (protein structural motif); Ecology; Biology; Pollinator; Population density; Population; Mark and recapture; Pollination; Pollen; Demography","score_opus":0.049162165795655105,"score_gpt":0.23479714991784575,"score_spread":0.18563498412219065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978877462","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99950707,0.000049615108,0.000003222179,0.00009987082,0.000038552218,0.00026404203,0.0000055379833,0.000005344334,0.000026730493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997956,0.000012446562,0.000022547649,0.00004457063,0.000100883284,0.0000048705683,7.447542e-7,7.469815e-7,0.000017546452],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993475,0.00004012568,0.00029103775,0.00008014565,0.00014262028,0.00009858555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990846,0.00031085123,0.00037092683,0.0000108305985,0.00020162376,0.000021148022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035911883,0.000071568014,0.00020152442,0.000031030908,0.00008486134,0.000030852603,0.00005767535,0.000030604922,0.000014075489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092073875,0.00002777301,0.000040356448,0.00023371835,0.000011442083,0.0002565906,0.0000136889585,0.00007827975,5.128946e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003226131,0.000139212,0.6961496,0.00001931788,0.00002258171,0.000029367215,0.0006352956,0.000049082868,0.30026424,0.0000018152867,0.000018838486,0.0023480481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007758568,0.0028152564,0.97867525,0.00006844761,0.000018223836,0.00015702637,0.013660758,0.00027359,0.0033859704,0.000012309043,0.00008239529,0.00007493343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017367501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025682157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29687828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002336161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015881074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9920966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986821609","doi":"10.1007/s10841-019-00189-z","title":"Identification “by eye”: integrative character assessment informs regional field identification of greater fritillary butterflies (Nymphalidae: Speyeria)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Alberta Conservation Association","keywords":"Nymphalidae; Subspecies; Biology; Identification (biology); Animal ecology; Taxon; DNA barcoding; Ecology; Butterfly; Zoology","score_opus":0.014186288827228041,"score_gpt":0.2616802546878634,"score_spread":0.24749396586063532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986821609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99294055,0.00013435437,0.0040108045,0.0017280154,0.00042125004,0.00018199235,0.000020639218,0.0000032600037,0.000559121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99790496,0.00014992808,0.00022785217,0.0010013832,0.00016467612,0.0000096023105,0.00020427379,0.0000075537423,0.00032975874],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874634,0.00009389859,0.0007468149,0.00015301658,0.00015562639,0.00010429132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99815696,0.000047326714,0.0010273259,0.00020542157,0.00053042197,0.00003253232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049304846,0.00012764164,0.00020449681,0.0001017014,0.00003869403,0.000035430876,0.00016611941,0.00018414923,0.000043648553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011017647,0.00010124713,0.000118445394,0.00007505618,0.000055319302,0.00006781438,0.000027977965,0.00014075353,0.000008991408],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002908009,0.000065743036,0.27164277,0.000037073747,0.00014564025,0.0000010692462,0.00018564473,0.000004366973,0.721912,0.0001456318,0.0022137072,0.003355516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008539997,0.0006793376,0.19781817,0.00009593892,0.000043419084,0.00004850044,0.00026781054,0.000100318204,0.7789021,0.00015767224,0.020841073,0.00019165283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017113322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005618248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07382461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000332095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012389934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41287383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006771717","doi":"10.1007/s10841-020-00222-6","title":"Sub-lethal exposure to a mammalian pesticide bait alters behaviour in an orthopteran","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Animal ecology; Brodifacoum; Pesticide; Rodenticide; Ecology; Pest control; Zoology; PEST analysis; Toxicology; Mating","score_opus":0.035674420466551046,"score_gpt":0.2636544434476712,"score_spread":0.22798002298112013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006771717","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9942051,0.00001140671,0.00017257684,0.0053039044,0.00009129513,0.00011519355,0.0000021961491,0.000007904017,0.000090381516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953782,0.0000034213115,0.0011121992,0.003425502,0.00005456825,0.0000046020928,0.0000015699729,0.0000073994092,0.000012516753],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990221,0.00009590944,0.0003862164,0.00014064612,0.000196486,0.00015858914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995367,0.00003831289,0.00018016236,0.00006017893,0.00003276065,0.00015188388],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002846332,0.00010153059,0.0001817922,0.000054137807,0.00006914705,0.000018668983,0.00015257427,0.00006191816,0.00033346473],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000120798424,0.00009179627,0.000050404346,0.000229866,0.000055919558,0.00035603368,0.00005074317,0.00021950307,0.000042533113],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021981643,0.00007433642,0.96687084,0.0000029508965,0.0000036745942,0.00019803694,0.0016940035,0.000320262,0.029033858,0.0000065968543,0.0005205439,0.0010550747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041767198,0.00154344,0.99604166,0.000013860696,0.000023190774,0.000044250126,0.00032799086,0.00006699902,0.0012896659,0.00001625376,0.00011428947,0.00010072368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001597408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002490241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029170817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009379463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025191273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3743343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3046900382","doi":"10.1007/s10841-020-00255-x","title":"Beetle biodiversity in forest habitats in Laos depends on the level of human exploitation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada; Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China; Department for International Development","keywords":"Animal ecology; Biodiversity; Evergreen forest; Evergreen; Deciduous; Dry season; Habitat; Wet season; Ecology; Geography; Global biodiversity; Logging; Agroforestry; Biology","score_opus":0.20275462512828302,"score_gpt":0.2509963367031678,"score_spread":0.04824171157488477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3046900382","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98094267,0.000015402386,7.1669945e-7,0.018848201,0.000034977646,0.00007066392,0.000016346814,0.0000021385235,0.00006886242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987335,0.000013086449,0.000016547367,0.0012014216,0.000023768163,5.9493595e-7,0.0000054824236,1.3588483e-7,0.0000054598354],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99946785,0.00008116529,0.00020823085,0.000059538557,0.00011511328,0.00006808978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994084,0.00025369442,0.00020905107,0.000013375244,0.00009702609,0.00001843952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028484897,0.00004865107,0.000117867254,0.000027346243,0.000091290036,0.0000068904014,0.00012446159,0.000047514746,0.000040130897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022018893,0.000018986091,0.000046334677,0.00025478675,0.000053065974,0.00012330164,0.000027662145,0.00012305994,0.000005252699],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013790427,0.00006475664,0.9801366,0.000004553131,0.000008269104,0.000008932068,0.0006986123,0.000018809276,0.016187327,0.00016958317,0.0022775095,0.00028718094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002657554,0.00069059856,0.99567,0.000020075306,0.0000047307126,9.933806e-7,0.0013191199,0.000018575683,0.0015187622,0.0003480872,0.00010753029,0.000035736135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00042772343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013701058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017790813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024901925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000008479063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76455116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3091985955","doi":"10.1007/s10841-020-00276-6","title":"Extent of Dakota skipper, Hesperia dacotae, distribution in Southeastern Saskatchewan, Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Dillon Consulting; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada; Nature Conservancy of Canada","keywords":"Habitat; Threatened species; Animal ecology; Ecology; Geography; Population; Biology","score_opus":0.028354368300893225,"score_gpt":0.21804632198220064,"score_spread":0.18969195368130742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3091985955","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947982,0.000048401827,0.0002749742,0.003959676,0.00013943351,0.00007936172,0.00010601019,0.000003703829,0.00059027504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988399,0.000017211458,0.00003330293,0.000986396,0.000034060155,0.000001352606,0.00004638614,0.0000050715194,0.00003628537],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988153,0.00006111254,0.000509936,0.00010058734,0.00037891828,0.00013412212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993348,0.000035318008,0.00038948655,0.00008102711,0.0000552309,0.00010410598],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021290546,0.00008941827,0.00018549024,0.000016407863,0.000030686628,0.00001408323,0.00015132062,0.000041416275,0.0051671355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012661141,0.00008033843,0.000054099477,0.00028856777,0.00005289962,0.00017312373,0.000045446515,0.00012563246,0.000018658908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030860526,0.00013717929,0.8633995,0.00003645164,0.000015370777,0.000036413046,0.0013212716,0.00023175505,0.102878615,0.00007855653,0.030592032,0.0009642149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007019094,0.00012888246,0.9785417,0.00003137748,0.000011203342,0.000022124035,0.004875328,0.00036593425,0.0046446985,0.000019153887,0.010560885,0.00009681498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09825803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60295886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50470084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005340099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015731837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99574226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251289678","doi":"10.1007/s10841-019-00159-5","title":"Correction to: Incorporating citizen science, museum specimens, and field work into the assessment of extinction risk of the American Bumble bee (Bombus pensylvanicus De Geer 1773) in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Environment and Climate Change Canada; W. Garfield Weston Foundation; Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Garfield Weston Foundation; Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Wildlife; Citizen science; Animal ecology; Library science; Christian ministry; Scholarship; Foundation (evidence); Political science; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Law","score_opus":0.015886919988179374,"score_gpt":0.21504750007794274,"score_spread":0.19916058008976337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251289678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975865,0.000026228985,0.000005137559,0.0019253284,0.00020771392,0.00009967317,0.0000019614922,0.0000012643592,0.00014622927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995011,0.00005203277,0.00011801824,0.0002631868,0.000049084454,0.0000010373835,2.4519022e-7,4.0518356e-7,0.000014860938],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992367,0.00008595857,0.0002712424,0.00007179783,0.00024519383,0.00008909922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998679,0.00047216186,0.0006387207,0.000018969808,0.00016753565,0.000023647224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007012592,0.000053413212,0.00014400564,0.00002165966,0.00013271831,0.00001899326,0.00013115983,0.000012206309,0.000008723112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002708366,0.000018817418,0.000028439681,0.00062440656,0.00005767326,0.000085057894,0.0000493291,0.00014445886,1.0498334e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043679516,0.000007951382,0.7693287,0.0000019424976,0.0000056402796,3.577814e-7,0.00011057842,0.000072038885,0.22461174,0.000008644684,0.00035839854,0.005450328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007107342,0.0002956514,0.9920086,0.00007562662,0.000008590893,0.0000061739556,0.0012430125,0.0004286546,0.0056195906,0.00007885895,0.00012631758,0.00003780501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38750914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79105765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4035485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014325826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018288154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6165695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285744314","doi":"10.1007/s10841-022-00400-8","title":"Flower plantings promote insect pollinator abundance and wild bee richness in Canadian agricultural landscapes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph; Bioinformatics Solutions (Canada)","funders":"Syngenta Canada","keywords":"Pollinator; Species richness; Animal ecology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Abundance (ecology); Biology; Pollination; Agroforestry; Habitat; Geography; Pollen","score_opus":0.023569550931144018,"score_gpt":0.18858379082820895,"score_spread":0.16501423989706493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285744314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99440086,0.00052061694,8.134738e-8,0.0047262656,0.00008217674,0.000089420384,0.000046810044,0.000007631589,0.00012615221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992652,0.00009006839,0.00001990454,0.0004305562,0.00012766421,0.000004580861,0.000010871981,6.731387e-7,0.000050487197],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916464,0.000064292384,0.00026446403,0.000106225576,0.00019105553,0.00020932857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952585,0.00009770702,0.00020279575,0.000007948787,0.00008227209,0.00008345905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040849333,0.00009500924,0.00017934162,0.000047267426,0.00034293707,0.00004982141,0.00013024494,0.00003570167,0.000049650756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076300916,0.00003956704,0.000042163705,0.00035490468,0.000017015886,0.00018873095,0.00003879303,0.00021748632,8.306248e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113918344,0.000047287347,0.8516362,0.000009158689,0.000019583493,0.000071593706,0.0005337339,0.000011762528,0.14426978,0.00009530336,0.0016339447,0.001557776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020696486,0.00024636457,0.9838632,0.00003301858,0.0000066780303,0.00019148954,0.00043825243,0.000056422243,0.00036603035,0.00007906114,0.0144045735,0.000107949636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03288959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47690618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44401658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080070975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040204657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9735505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308076663","doi":"10.1007/s10841-022-00437-9","title":"Response of bee and hoverfly populations to a land-use gradient in a Quebec floodplain","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université Laval; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation","funders":"","keywords":"Ecology; Floodplain; Animal ecology; Species richness; Abundance (ecology); Pollinator; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Geography; Biology; Pollination; Agroforestry; Pollen","score_opus":0.08300162478668445,"score_gpt":0.23553356699477607,"score_spread":0.15253194220809163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308076663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99554443,0.00009035231,0.0000017191038,0.004216682,0.000029105278,0.00007056092,0.000038607446,0.0000028099475,0.0000057470593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994144,0.000014777064,0.00008914993,0.00039247767,0.00002226663,0.0000032106093,0.000002944928,3.287908e-7,0.00006046689],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933517,0.00014584974,0.00024639093,0.00005640258,0.00014563743,0.00007055361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994711,0.00027700834,0.00015779921,0.000007501255,0.00005576913,0.000030766314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005047077,0.000045554778,0.00012349249,0.0000456722,0.00010715734,0.000017583392,0.000058556587,0.000014336284,0.000019187544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024539075,0.000020679245,0.000032238073,0.00028776462,0.000011983765,0.00011365659,0.00004300771,0.00007507364,2.411167e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012577744,0.000063010746,0.6666517,0.0000019632485,0.0000069861076,0.000013001733,0.0005304588,0.000039071085,0.32904148,0.0001449691,0.00089466764,0.0013548984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018130883,0.0005846203,0.9953645,0.000020714524,0.000004981827,0.000025883992,0.0003573675,0.000052003405,0.00042983802,0.000097206124,0.0028373196,0.000044275934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011580815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099229254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32871276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004165786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014748278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99500114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382249061","doi":"10.1007/s10841-023-00490-y","title":"Syrphid fly response to urban heat islands varies with functional traits","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre de Géomatique du Québec; Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval; Ministère de l'Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l'Alimentation","funders":"","keywords":"Species richness; Animal ecology; Ecology; Urbanization; Biology; Biodiversity; Insectivore; Occupancy; Habitat","score_opus":0.06511731159813162,"score_gpt":0.2096203497363961,"score_spread":0.14450303813826448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382249061","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9876504,0.00004556762,0.000014095724,0.011968648,0.00007016484,0.000057519326,0.000021899807,0.00002927998,0.00014242959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982114,0.000022618879,0.000043410186,0.00088647223,0.00033696296,0.0000030054453,0.000008446681,7.1970885e-7,0.00048695138],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992538,0.00006464758,0.00020556126,0.00008571185,0.00025434734,0.00013592982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992347,0.00040330834,0.00008276043,0.000009011563,0.00020881195,0.00006142423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004590042,0.000082905295,0.0001442532,0.000041767016,0.00020249446,0.000050578088,0.000079606565,0.00003606387,0.000061222556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016969579,0.000028769547,0.000050286566,0.0005560276,0.000024857776,0.00015168905,0.000017697546,0.00008674093,0.000023383574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054922323,0.000040673414,0.11626778,0.0000049184673,0.000053631284,0.000054948177,0.0005115711,0.000036034442,0.81351274,0.00008446928,0.06221526,0.0017257361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020196238,0.0011614626,0.9709775,0.000043248176,0.000010710329,0.00007425352,0.0002740337,0.000030302506,0.0009355281,0.0000779009,0.02613314,0.00007996975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003564113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00059867266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8547097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021430504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026382637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1557444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384007806","doi":"10.1007/s10841-023-00488-6","title":"Low extinction risk in the flower fly fauna of northeastern North America","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"Yale University; Sarah K. DeCoizart Article TENTH Perpetual Charitable Trust","keywords":"Fauna; Ecology; Biology; Animal ecology; Biodiversity; Extinction (optical mineralogy); Threatened species; Brood; Range (aeronautics); Pollinator; Habitat; Geography; Pollination; Pollen","score_opus":0.04623348190245613,"score_gpt":0.21212021140222173,"score_spread":0.1658867294997656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384007806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984275,0.00004997003,0.000004158274,0.0012652162,0.0000653314,0.00005417953,0.000016787853,0.000006639039,0.00011018353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923676,0.00038562788,0.000008332124,0.0002022845,0.0001379327,0.0000014928673,0.00000865192,3.4920689e-7,0.000018587112],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992885,0.00009266283,0.00027913088,0.000053782336,0.00019619358,0.00008975898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992147,0.00031668608,0.00032964646,0.000012846758,0.00011140576,0.000014691098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003323611,0.000056137837,0.0001240585,0.000025510422,0.00008186653,0.00001565904,0.000119360215,0.00002347039,0.000019333273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001458793,0.000017828168,0.000068134796,0.0005532182,0.000026861111,0.00010636501,0.0000115329385,0.00011217935,0.000009547685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012619076,0.000060654365,0.9178118,0.000004805319,0.000015158376,0.000011742484,0.00064012775,0.00005997992,0.03248052,0.0000024150372,0.00087705126,0.047909535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009878021,0.00021955377,0.9940377,0.000023410008,0.000008092693,0.000008466567,0.000831654,0.00022753443,0.00017923262,0.000043579807,0.0042828587,0.000039131904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039464107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013860785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076225884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008692172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069639586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7734643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386169481","doi":"10.1007/s10841-023-00502-x","title":"Adult activities of endangered Oarisma poweshiek butterflies are associated with a soil moisture gradient in tall grass prairie in Manitoba, Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"Nature Conservancy of Canada; University of Winnipeg","keywords":"Animal ecology; Nectar; Endangered species; Ecology; Habitat; Grassland; Biology; Geography","score_opus":0.038229496507392345,"score_gpt":0.18710775457249215,"score_spread":0.1488782580650998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386169481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953504,0.000072560586,1.7162108e-7,0.0043382687,0.000054020464,0.00007711642,0.00005707736,0.000008034662,0.000042330703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960583,0.00008347341,0.0000044172975,0.00020167221,0.000044988694,0.000004381927,0.000019383377,9.1387153e-7,0.000034922545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906623,0.00008458438,0.00032347487,0.00008535365,0.00027264547,0.00016769231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989724,0.0003347332,0.0004768796,0.000011941995,0.00017566408,0.000028345365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002402447,0.000101793536,0.00026130534,0.0000520166,0.000057145797,0.00001964068,0.000100112506,0.000053851498,0.0000025165748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024087595,0.000042803753,0.00003770742,0.0005851293,0.0000358886,0.00013708434,0.00002048814,0.00016641193,2.0298867e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017587618,0.000055923898,0.9769745,0.0000112954185,0.000031516127,0.00015160248,0.00029500164,0.000029309362,0.019571878,0.000009762281,0.0023094283,0.00038388968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031561623,0.00026685584,0.9924284,0.00027988604,0.000007759222,0.00001346691,0.005198566,0.000046593646,0.0010818567,0.00009720194,0.00017650455,0.00008728216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32811823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99824554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6701273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014947237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060043567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6763559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387702620","doi":"10.1007/s10841-023-00528-1","title":"Functional traits of wild bees in response to urbanization","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Animal ecology; Urbanization; Entomology; Biodiversity; Ecology; Biology; Geography; Zoology","score_opus":0.08447181746417677,"score_gpt":0.2246084883073886,"score_spread":0.14013667084321185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387702620","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99423385,0.000036143763,0.0000048148854,0.005574243,0.00004979119,0.000046454537,0.000010216755,0.000008295246,0.00003617517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99948734,0.000030117768,0.000029451938,0.000251242,0.000093373186,0.0000011363194,0.000005225411,3.5977743e-7,0.00010174341],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993811,0.000062464205,0.00026374546,0.000051139716,0.00016880564,0.00007274705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933004,0.00032676553,0.0001451287,0.000005228719,0.00016813952,0.00002469458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005377018,0.000043987788,0.00011024511,0.00005952041,0.000042377997,0.000009711406,0.000057181565,0.000030504672,0.000032882446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004263961,0.000018600113,0.00003632586,0.0007456648,0.000011289981,0.000108673325,0.0000134236025,0.00005006501,0.000007328724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007556162,0.000025372752,0.14137392,0.0000027959509,0.0000065634713,0.0000048858124,0.00015961756,0.0000647189,0.8491897,0.00005324489,0.0058071148,0.0025564595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013326426,0.00033895115,0.99395585,0.000045841753,0.000002975448,0.0000073925057,0.00017525397,0.000039486964,0.0025280637,0.00015480365,0.0025799463,0.000038155125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005107634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008837827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8525819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001776892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014504746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07584906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389789846","doi":"10.1007/s10841-023-00540-5","title":"Mission Monarch: engaging the Canadian public for the conservation of a species at risk","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Espace pour la vie","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Animal ecology; Biodiversity; Entomology; Ecology; Biodiversity conservation; Geography; Environmental resource management; Biology; Environmental science","score_opus":0.17538502443017853,"score_gpt":0.2540256484087229,"score_spread":0.07864062397854435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389789846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88832426,0.00024327342,0.000008019255,0.110809684,0.00024207693,0.00022052223,0.000028725297,0.00000805625,0.00011537333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810463,0.00040345624,0.00004347302,0.000942017,0.0002276757,0.000010114837,0.0000039771458,8.326546e-7,0.00026380195],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990949,0.00014839039,0.00034176244,0.000076157376,0.00016248629,0.00017629126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966433,0.002303357,0.00050078775,0.000044251337,0.00045627946,0.000051990544],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016429953,0.00007456747,0.00013917306,0.000036967966,0.0013036098,0.000047187037,0.00020922832,0.000055311306,0.00004195451],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013401109,0.000022776312,0.000110102024,0.0004230386,0.00013240124,0.0001229997,0.00003427742,0.00014826182,0.0000026637897],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097999364,0.000022753087,0.93216795,0.000011327816,0.00011598693,0.0000023172245,0.00025512144,0.000025813293,0.01776436,0.00030941886,0.042873878,0.006353088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012864152,0.00012196903,0.8318494,0.000012458871,0.000023396215,0.0000073593314,0.0012880632,0.0008165676,0.00033188215,0.0005925729,0.16478638,0.000041288364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047763023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4961123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.491336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009410043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009372931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402179526","doi":"10.1007/s10841-024-00623-x","title":"Evaluating the status and habitat preferences of the threatened skipper, Euphyes vestris harbisoni, in southern California, USA","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Genetic diversity and population structure","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Animal ecology; Threatened species; Biodiversity; Habitat; Geography; Ecology; Biology","score_opus":0.0497983274925261,"score_gpt":0.29548869504984854,"score_spread":0.24569036755732243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402179526","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9972302,0.0017419116,0.000049909133,0.0006998068,0.00013492888,0.00007443129,0.000031584845,9.1982264e-7,0.00003631813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993277,0.00017810111,0.00024348575,0.000122032216,0.000049287817,8.1119134e-7,0.000004921813,0.0000033553608,0.00007025653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993578,0.00011846822,0.00022161065,0.00007317604,0.00015076563,0.00007815685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995781,0.000045104316,0.00015872023,0.000080325866,0.000117441494,0.000020294337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032123787,0.000059056678,0.00007883003,0.000036006106,0.000054921864,0.00003387256,0.00009418337,0.00005787426,0.000014235353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000177478,0.00003276013,0.000047948513,0.00010624458,0.0000640915,0.0000066112507,0.000035306693,0.000100888385,8.224177e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100102145,0.000009549164,0.8561092,0.000036253903,0.00005120899,7.038582e-7,0.0011715956,0.00068589067,0.13516138,0.000031016985,0.00020188415,0.0064412327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005021308,0.00036728918,0.9735359,0.0001516582,0.00006737024,0.00002651444,0.0012039931,0.0009789616,0.01957842,0.0018478906,0.0016530644,0.000086825115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002176514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005928792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11742671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009135336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015994979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13359194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402528225","doi":"10.1007/s10841-024-00626-8","title":"Vital rate responses to temperature lead to butterfly population declines under future warming scenarios","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"U.S. Department of the Interior; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Animal ecology; Butterfly; Ecology; Population; Climate change; Biodiversity; Global warming; Environmental science; Biology; Environmental health; Medicine","score_opus":0.03474978702575055,"score_gpt":0.2853426451770706,"score_spread":0.25059285815132004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402528225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96557486,0.00010871793,0.00042856394,0.032557882,0.001008186,0.00014655208,0.000026887195,0.000032184686,0.00011618967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99208343,0.000028743603,0.0003148962,0.00663527,0.00039816336,0.000004664994,0.000023765344,0.000013850362,0.0004971881],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886703,0.00011216511,0.00037275074,0.0001673448,0.00031376982,0.00016693195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994849,0.000108136366,0.000105354324,0.00010479007,0.0000753405,0.00012147229],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005873098,0.00012840796,0.00014447497,0.00014677198,0.00014123556,0.0001905486,0.00012865681,0.00008817112,0.0018972971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002358198,0.000104314844,0.00008251667,0.00060391624,0.000020475127,0.00047130857,0.00004827964,0.00021906235,0.0002970024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064353517,0.00007072055,0.08007948,0.000036509216,0.000035673922,0.000079190955,0.0014277356,0.0010299067,0.8202992,0.00045308121,0.09206803,0.0037769163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002587118,0.00026141296,0.9476705,0.00015692881,0.00002679654,0.00013879035,0.0016313428,0.0002060643,0.008299525,0.00018026077,0.04096205,0.0002075848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015212456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006366054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.867591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005705222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032360836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406813427","doi":"10.1007/s10841-025-00648-w","title":"What is the best time of the day to monitor Odonata? An investigation into changes in the abundance and species richness of dragonflies in ponds in northern Italy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Odonata; Animal ecology; Abundance (ecology); Species richness; Ecology; Biodiversity; Dragonfly; Geography; Anisoptera; Biology","score_opus":0.02436919785917544,"score_gpt":0.25268460190577646,"score_spread":0.22831540404660103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406813427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787602,0.00016622467,0.0000036051447,0.020687712,0.00009223934,0.00017165486,0.000008436994,0.0000010668374,0.00010889159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984667,0.00018433799,0.0000086606615,0.0012325025,0.000012114957,0.0000065700015,0.0000029422417,0.0000026098621,0.00008356601],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991011,0.00016301198,0.00032319798,0.00008192679,0.000251426,0.00007931009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993615,0.00018383774,0.00024708372,0.00014130848,0.00005046463,0.00001576875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090017327,0.00007116698,0.00012814229,0.00009870312,0.0000510555,0.00005893638,0.00028598405,0.00003935772,0.000097571705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016731434,0.000040733885,0.000023353403,0.000801176,0.00021653282,0.00047527123,0.00006740545,0.00011858923,0.0000023499067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035589776,0.000057890786,0.9377015,0.000016287162,0.0000032421822,8.6377105e-7,0.021106735,0.00005639305,0.03981684,0.00010485015,0.00012605247,0.00097373425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020792412,0.00006620785,0.9634151,0.00016337277,0.0000052740293,0.0000026898408,0.024414726,0.00014403637,0.010848345,0.00039934955,0.000292919,0.00004006211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006229457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026191011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028968496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019119537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022507467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99157846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410381500","doi":"10.1007/s10841-025-00676-6","title":"Mapping monarch seasonal breeding patterns in Eastern North America to inform mowing strategies for roadsides and other rights-of-ways","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Environment and Climate Change Canada; University of Saskatchewan; Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"Canadian Wildlife Federation","keywords":"Animal ecology; Entomology; Geography; Biodiversity; Ecology; Agroforestry; Plant science; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.04567316580114904,"score_gpt":0.27562163977790455,"score_spread":0.2299484739767555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410381500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98885334,0.000015680364,0.010249967,0.00045770698,0.0000631064,0.00013751551,0.0000042303504,0.000002862371,0.0002155985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997486,0.0000021874976,0.0018324595,0.0006124519,0.00001649091,0.0000068353743,9.56397e-7,0.000002962705,0.000039651306],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993641,0.000016744389,0.00031888272,0.0000753875,0.000111272864,0.000113641545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962276,0.00009645708,0.00017918962,0.000040854182,0.000029181245,0.000031531716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021146824,0.00006694535,0.00013981936,0.00012889944,0.00007302368,0.000021379085,0.00008875665,0.000038777336,0.000043906268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033083354,0.000057337413,0.000033326593,0.00022415626,0.00005255105,0.0003615095,0.000039971605,0.000095693,0.0000017366309],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000667405,0.000026846006,0.9869885,0.00001745692,0.000011513125,0.0000030233962,0.0015271817,0.0005476729,0.0029455272,0.00003128878,0.000052915668,0.0077813673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033015295,0.00015105505,0.99580604,0.00010712824,0.000011013693,0.000005010702,0.0008398813,0.0010444447,0.0003151718,0.00042073222,0.00091344246,0.000055931436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033550162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002219287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008817569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007800873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003971358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23381518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411069204","doi":"10.1007/s10841-025-00683-7","title":"Changes in plant-pollinator network structure and individual species network roles across a gradient of Apis mellifera abundance: the importance of considering the floral context","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Animal ecology; Pollinator; Abundance (ecology); Context (archaeology); Biology; Ecology; Biodiversity; Pollination; Pollen","score_opus":0.05349368086738949,"score_gpt":0.23001608112346822,"score_spread":0.17652240025607874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411069204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9890365,0.006151039,0.000001447337,0.004481279,0.00012206044,0.00011178101,0.000085015694,0.000002536206,0.000008350323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979936,0.0010724717,0.000026068534,0.0006523835,0.00023991236,0.0000017390649,0.0000039429674,4.96191e-7,0.000009383479],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991323,0.00008673332,0.0003760723,0.00007524609,0.0001591408,0.0001705419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877596,0.00060318137,0.00047486552,0.000020637373,0.00010943626,0.000015894519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006247504,0.00009307659,0.0002664796,0.0000101142805,0.00021602584,0.00003574132,0.00016293062,0.00004912012,0.00000831645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007629724,0.000029836918,0.00004743877,0.0002929425,0.00017841214,0.00006540488,0.00006678101,0.0001606782,2.9086547e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018958638,0.000011993955,0.9810258,0.000017125569,0.000066469904,0.0000032973137,0.0009878331,0.00009607048,0.012985017,0.0012800132,0.0013311103,0.0020056649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018792653,0.00014331978,0.99121416,0.00023917572,0.000018875291,0.000016138987,0.002203268,0.00006536642,0.0024667496,0.002148344,0.0012447991,0.00005187308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000106620195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053152367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053045746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011589634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016470087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96412516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411300248","doi":"10.1007/s10841-025-00678-4","title":"Click beetles (Elateridae) identify conservation units in Oriental and European beech forests","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue; Ontario Forest Research Institute","funders":"Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Animal ecology; Beech; Geography; Ecology; Entomology; Biodiversity; Agroforestry; Forestry; Biology","score_opus":0.02897448779308586,"score_gpt":0.23169734482239487,"score_spread":0.202722857029309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411300248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99456656,0.00014428732,0.000002969923,0.0046753124,0.00022675848,0.0000809903,0.0000073483734,0.000008200086,0.00028759398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868006,0.00011722248,0.000034473378,0.0010071404,0.00004704415,6.2552726e-7,0.000014634212,3.4476182e-7,0.00009847956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999277,0.00013698828,0.0003037284,0.00009265198,0.00008878364,0.00010085867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934804,0.00018266359,0.00020196638,0.000019060719,0.0002237614,0.000024528845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005017368,0.00007420988,0.00013558147,0.00005743466,0.00016819737,0.000038737508,0.00009993947,0.00006233826,0.000018557928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023702267,0.000035000372,0.00002948511,0.00041795385,0.000087911045,0.00023866048,0.000063849184,0.00012695378,0.0000038372814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010126843,0.00003477554,0.9777965,0.000009023455,0.000020538615,0.000022031169,0.00016609325,0.0000011211483,0.016335025,0.00023925868,0.0026586906,0.0026156658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003485406,0.00018861727,0.99457014,0.000071543574,0.000015536449,0.000017463462,0.00042187833,0.000022101807,0.000597339,0.0006039221,0.0030847515,0.000058147787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000282875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056127403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016773649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032786713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018813585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31320408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413202335","doi":"10.1007/s10841-025-00701-8","title":"Correction: Changes in plant-pollinator network structure and individual species network roles across a gradient of Apis mellifera abundance: the importance of considering the floral context","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Plant and animal studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Animal ecology; Pollinator; Abundance (ecology); Context (archaeology); Ecology; Biodiversity; Biology; Pollination; Pollen","score_opus":0.04837653547047043,"score_gpt":0.22761791136426962,"score_spread":0.17924137589379918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413202335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99028325,0.0055344,0.0000023473467,0.003641537,0.0003574901,0.00010920645,0.0000555483,0.0000030695462,0.00001315199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99808484,0.0009895058,0.00001730641,0.0005618982,0.00031883174,0.000001955617,0.000003903728,5.0302583e-7,0.000021230404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915165,0.00008871451,0.0003696231,0.00007679786,0.00015533123,0.00015790478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986751,0.00068398844,0.00048103314,0.000020151634,0.00012422413,0.000015486212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057839515,0.00009210722,0.0002561883,0.0000106612415,0.00025028977,0.000036989702,0.00014042036,0.000050564227,0.000010307076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000088285546,0.000030646388,0.000047381396,0.0003304153,0.00016991512,0.00006840126,0.000057030462,0.00017712655,3.2249787e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022388129,0.00001312231,0.98326224,0.000013845817,0.000066675646,0.0000029841958,0.0010093786,0.00016412929,0.0074647763,0.00060884334,0.004258352,0.0029117693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017743955,0.00016470581,0.9911076,0.00026830705,0.000019851284,0.000028396136,0.0027079063,0.00014360147,0.0023940492,0.0011278951,0.0018074701,0.000052780044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012633698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05387378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053747445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001417232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017888116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9633905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416076393","doi":"10.1007/s10841-025-00727-y","title":"Host plant patch size selection of an endangered butterfly, the mottled duskywing (Erynnis martialis), at a reintroduction site","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Ministry of Environment; Parks Canada; University of Guelph","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Animal ecology; Host (biology); Selection (genetic algorithm); Endangered species; Limiting; Habitat; Biodiversity","score_opus":0.01122693552909857,"score_gpt":0.2257184984521595,"score_spread":0.21449156292306093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416076393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948981,0.00013876037,0.0013658957,0.002762874,0.00041967077,0.00012988105,0.000014757486,0.000004631326,0.00026547667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99793583,0.000086250926,0.00047905656,0.0008464265,0.0004187607,0.0000058456567,0.000052523075,0.000005815866,0.0001694791],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897903,0.00023677497,0.00043028107,0.0001476366,0.000090791575,0.00011549697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894786,0.00009046722,0.00046402795,0.00016652116,0.00030383797,0.000027257507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005802707,0.00010491155,0.00016879362,0.00007119973,0.00013017179,0.000017596029,0.00011207988,0.000144644,0.000022373564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037489698,0.0000776832,0.000098660625,0.00014350939,0.00006481115,0.00002288363,0.00003726112,0.00014515728,0.0000010132335],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013446836,0.000063198844,0.12418371,0.000022157463,0.0001560389,0.0000027149997,0.00014373445,0.00004524251,0.86926603,0.000024862235,0.0013277896,0.0034198307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012311963,0.0009017543,0.16949552,0.000077228324,0.00012989812,0.00023054545,0.00008682429,0.0005992607,0.79231256,0.00008792545,0.034695104,0.00015219077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020098382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004762646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07695349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049622275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011989579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3167829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417292482","doi":"10.1007/s10841-025-00741-0","title":"Multi-species aggregation and movement patterns of danaid butterflies (Nymphalidae: Danainae) in Hong Kong","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Overwintering; Animal ecology; Habitat; Butterfly; Danaus; Interspecific competition; Seasonality; Lepidoptera genitalia","score_opus":0.02016807736083199,"score_gpt":0.24663335358947944,"score_spread":0.22646527622864746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417292482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990944,0.0006599361,0.007026945,0.0008273585,0.00013364892,0.00009336786,0.000007137191,0.0000014099224,0.00030619217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980277,0.00032217414,0.0008283794,0.0006448381,0.000055472465,0.000003422313,0.000014337261,0.000003249935,0.00010043273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927217,0.000083180006,0.00039950685,0.00010266477,0.00005855337,0.0000839455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993846,0.000038724695,0.00030372565,0.00009455847,0.00016015896,0.000018272249],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003139611,0.000084237785,0.00015620515,0.00013871786,0.000029837347,0.000012795896,0.000079248304,0.000094294446,0.0000034018797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015665534,0.00007496202,0.000045367262,0.00007496016,0.00005062641,0.000016426373,0.000038326994,0.00007654298,1.1925206e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105532636,0.00004443374,0.9182024,0.00004848417,0.000060617927,0.0000034664502,0.000097186545,0.000035164623,0.0735947,0.00014931032,0.00005756464,0.0076011335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001145262,0.00019118318,0.84223247,0.00019522865,0.000018455818,0.0000071737927,0.00025577462,0.00011487972,0.15276168,0.00008793,0.002912477,0.0000774756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000860658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047983974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07916698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024679828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007377085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30568627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W98741260","doi":"10.1023/a:1027309101653","title":"Differences in ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) of original and reconstructed tallgrass prairies in northeastern Iowa, USA, and impact of 3-year spring burn cycles","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Insect Conservation","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Iowa Department of Natural Resources; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Ground beetle; Ecology; Species richness; Ordination; Animal ecology; Biodiversity; Pitfall trap; Geography; Species diversity; Environmental science; Biology; Habitat","score_opus":0.015613222320586631,"score_gpt":0.2306432163107843,"score_spread":0.21502999399019768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W98741260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99949884,0.00012509324,0.000022067392,0.000032038224,0.000060467504,0.00013785175,0.000003236967,0.0000015114134,0.00011889597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99940366,0.000054364824,0.0005153572,0.000006637596,0.00000867678,0.0000016052157,2.403315e-7,0.000005257383,0.000004220427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988011,0.00018743737,0.0005637156,0.000114894574,0.00020797383,0.00012486638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909645,0.00020365858,0.00054644747,0.00007089964,0.000035185083,0.000047328267],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000599749,0.00011229111,0.0003315183,0.00017313205,0.000021718506,0.000024951969,0.00007481725,0.00007397959,0.000033237866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001832064,0.000091345246,0.000039427803,0.00022594699,0.00017607142,0.00042508534,0.000021189946,0.00016685134,6.8988874e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008473125,0.00003979366,0.98264587,0.00005215879,0.000016990376,0.000008196396,0.00048435814,0.000050305767,0.015614772,0.000029202436,0.0000016873963,0.0009719465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007583075,0.0003355848,0.9965756,0.0002734014,0.00000874396,0.00007985895,0.00018384833,0.0007333936,0.0008315933,0.00013431646,0.0000040521195,0.0000813259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015682032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032818347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017136315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011280769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050275983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9908726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}