{"meta":{"query_hash":"cae9e21d0b0c","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cae9e21d0b0c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Intellectual+Property+Law+%26+Practice"},"results":[{"id":"W1686166217","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv206","title":"Remix allowed: avenues for copyright reform inspired by Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.019605561559631984,"score_gpt":0.2263162266808049,"score_spread":0.20671066512117292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1686166217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024992095,0.0031667957,0.0060656667,0.07869164,0.005197362,0.001664623,0.000050183742,0.00018349648,0.87998813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9616407,0.00027427322,0.0005580297,0.016652763,0.0024648935,0.000020278898,0.000009118983,0.000095692936,0.018284226],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972444,0.00006025255,0.0010482954,0.00034895568,0.000750898,0.00054720853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508053,0.001232104,0.0010546172,0.00033306814,0.0022239464,0.00007570711],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010978277,0.0003707593,0.0005341819,0.0001468157,0.00042206855,0.00036459012,0.0007696126,0.000140702,0.002687988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0107784,0.00016207043,0.000228019,0.00032872052,0.00017758663,0.004804344,0.00016584055,0.00042175248,0.00022684969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034257795,0.000203223,0.0000053737535,0.00007499389,0.00020848219,0.000033617038,0.00015703386,5.4215405e-7,0.014664389,0.0011285091,0.96011525,0.019982815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012235207,0.0003941932,0.0000024063781,0.00023394618,0.00016652523,0.00012054461,0.00034916663,0.00055016833,0.011666872,0.0005851665,0.9843195,0.00038797245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16927391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058681995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9366486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006919071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005807627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99822366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1854973628","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv115","title":"Canadian Federal Court of Appeal denies further particulars in rare industrial designs action","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.2132789539531079,"score_gpt":0.3525633127651686,"score_spread":0.13928435881206072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1854973628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46837428,0.0018738636,0.0018042664,0.067306794,0.004935265,0.002399281,0.000014960651,0.00010043977,0.45319083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951721,0.00014022454,0.0007585043,0.0011389824,0.0007581136,0.000007054861,0.0000014488766,0.00003918837,0.0019843995],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943861,0.0023172444,0.0010903685,0.00025167584,0.0012495985,0.0007050542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949937,0.0014015584,0.00068131724,0.000212011,0.002021447,0.0006899811],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055997428,0.00026028545,0.0005469012,0.0003409077,0.00038351648,0.0002718661,0.0006119254,0.00039312028,0.0007731582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031089257,0.0001747509,0.00017743892,0.0007328727,0.0005576912,0.0020883086,0.00006465272,0.0012717744,0.00013438471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.026756583,0.0025826055,0.0018178648,0.00009234155,0.0014093209,0.0014637422,0.62398833,0.0023594152,0.0049508866,0.01385566,0.2734509,0.04727237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018614534,0.0020569325,0.000009597209,0.00022831897,0.00013369523,0.00042928933,0.09398148,0.00037372808,0.006393372,0.00078147586,0.8933096,0.00044109358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38746506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47207758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6198587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017146699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061775297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892605819","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv095","title":"Multiple patent challenges in the USA, Canada, France and the UK","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patent infringement; Patent troll; Political science; Law and economics; Patent law; Business; Law; Economics; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.24704630222532345,"score_gpt":0.2489858932559188,"score_spread":0.00193959103059535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892605819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4494171,0.028193502,0.0003286364,0.14313516,0.0032852127,0.0019348741,0.0000033611423,0.000030845957,0.3736713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98068887,0.00072761514,0.000063357365,0.017104244,0.0007933658,0.000010705755,7.2918414e-7,0.000019359162,0.00059174694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977623,0.0003275608,0.0006158364,0.000193613,0.00078566757,0.0003150225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960996,0.0022311255,0.0005193853,0.00024139354,0.000874927,0.000033565466],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042383824,0.00022405905,0.00033708254,0.00008053369,0.0002704646,0.00033982316,0.00061424705,0.000071647526,0.0001568078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013940393,0.000084505984,0.00007836322,0.0002897043,0.0002462505,0.0013131727,0.000161363,0.0008632145,0.00011057216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0747502,0.0034838899,0.01523134,0.0010394035,0.0018797438,0.0031839646,0.11102155,0.0030542954,0.00035008465,0.079243965,0.5651063,0.14165527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027672462,0.0001877909,0.00040043792,0.00013210785,0.00011235912,0.00064969197,0.010969729,0.0037558018,0.000053409476,0.0005140458,0.9802157,0.00024163116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4833175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42078525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53127176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071190494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024715366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99436563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937948075","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv092","title":"First comprehensive review of metatag liability by a Canadian court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Federal court; Law; Court decision; Political science; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05952044708382473,"score_gpt":0.26998204153823485,"score_spread":0.21046159445441012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937948075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035696614,0.089430206,0.0006729247,0.06464069,0.002031224,0.0015191928,0.000022129914,0.00007588438,0.8380381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.889209,0.014373867,0.0017335326,0.089335725,0.0018878689,0.000019265153,0.000031968826,0.00013430446,0.003274474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685943,0.00017079181,0.0013413809,0.0003022349,0.0008906546,0.00043549616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904818,0.0009761637,0.0012271439,0.00042519454,0.0067037838,0.00018592548],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026708723,0.00034591954,0.0008602625,0.0002353125,0.0002232235,0.0002479544,0.0007752604,0.000119281714,0.0048146304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026034465,0.00019327374,0.00029459334,0.00075039105,0.00029625063,0.003911532,0.00018903945,0.00076772243,0.0006541961],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000910967,0.00032503885,0.0000134273,0.0017356717,0.0002378857,0.000038476992,0.0004242261,0.0000074996174,0.00014036121,0.00037473853,0.9932118,0.0025799181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005848798,0.00039676984,0.0000029209018,0.0016530068,0.00040291096,0.0001952092,0.0007375346,0.0018797641,0.0003703929,0.00025411457,0.99322474,0.00029776918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.114083335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008647207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8856393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028824943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007564699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946532422","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv110","title":"Sweet success: ‘Valentine Secret’ not confusing with ‘Victoria's Secret’, rules Federal Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Trade secret; Federal court; Law; Political science; Advertising; Business; Intellectual property; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03821629386603757,"score_gpt":0.289577209192768,"score_spread":0.25136091532673044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946532422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39525583,0.0024604325,0.0013327287,0.029466733,0.003466102,0.0007953263,0.000025448702,0.00006156937,0.5671358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941163,0.00012660271,0.00068192405,0.0012412266,0.0015525428,0.0000024568765,0.0000016766361,0.000031859236,0.0022454301],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559844,0.00072694564,0.00093645114,0.00022262886,0.002029622,0.00048589884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99230164,0.0012855304,0.0014716267,0.0001648485,0.0042985003,0.00047783076],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035771353,0.00024035407,0.00062814093,0.00007436248,0.0006263379,0.00037002275,0.0005316914,0.00014044218,0.00023516576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011543982,0.00014221942,0.00009142174,0.0003858152,0.00043256028,0.0019566831,0.000072665076,0.00063523627,0.000008370329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04531679,0.002860018,0.005013664,0.0014155209,0.004553869,0.002469223,0.37388703,0.001357196,0.007225975,0.0714206,0.47593796,0.008542145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00101566,0.001053367,0.000021922688,0.0003828647,0.00015256315,0.00027784784,0.026361194,0.000080456906,0.002606095,0.0001743085,0.96756583,0.0003078584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8158454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56760424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59886044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049110816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009188309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966565519","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jps062","title":"Infringement for copying publicly filed court documents: class action certified in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Class action; Law; Corporation; Certification; Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Copyright infringement; Political science; Action (physics); Service (business); Business; Computer science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.12448166996967591,"score_gpt":0.37367744676494447,"score_spread":0.24919577679526855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966565519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4962901,0.00074497703,0.006278622,0.038941316,0.0064560757,0.0022030133,0.0000027741673,0.000090219,0.4489929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900057,0.00023451947,0.001622267,0.0013222692,0.0007108212,0.000025763196,0.0000020020634,0.000017921555,0.0060587716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976908,0.0003003405,0.0006956381,0.00014619762,0.0006563723,0.0005106592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704766,0.0012069115,0.0006399778,0.00012165654,0.00075643416,0.00022733415],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049945177,0.00014394848,0.00026108764,0.00014865509,0.00046916227,0.00032439354,0.00024118234,0.00013580723,0.0014070092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005042003,0.00010156542,0.00013192851,0.00022446441,0.0000976973,0.004400879,0.000047811063,0.00062898756,0.000034802986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02282322,0.006939655,0.015943894,0.00016909822,0.0015518754,0.000045861703,0.56517535,0.00023600041,0.008175576,0.041442927,0.17533123,0.16216531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081423466,0.00045121464,0.00037234664,0.00007069965,0.000085458516,0.000030988198,0.009487806,0.00007002875,0.00054106256,0.00009461709,0.98783183,0.00014971498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119626075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18297806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8125006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015810675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066555105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966575687","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpn073","title":"Canadian Federal Court of Appeal confirms that irreparable harm must be demonstrated in injunction cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Harm; Damages; Interim; Federal court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Supreme court; Economics","score_opus":0.10254589870254925,"score_gpt":0.33497271280187485,"score_spread":0.23242681409932558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966575687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58961713,0.00042974428,0.0002217745,0.035672553,0.0004666701,0.0006352865,0.000018257633,0.00002885539,0.3729097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99556804,0.0005531977,0.0004340538,0.0013255741,0.00016884039,0.000005361778,0.0000024156059,0.000012769726,0.0019297374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980437,0.00037153132,0.00056935445,0.00015778991,0.00051020074,0.00034737942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975286,0.00083493185,0.00049231004,0.0001277124,0.0007148376,0.00030158256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00125302,0.00013081182,0.0002791188,0.00013964248,0.0007693835,0.000107634274,0.00028580998,0.00013331755,0.0005063348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030934336,0.00009118652,0.00009571596,0.00044317284,0.00041237695,0.0011514119,0.000025033683,0.0006013601,0.000028624825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013339364,0.008329341,0.018374564,0.0002489509,0.0017458828,0.0064498396,0.3709444,0.004336579,0.013161822,0.112048015,0.42458904,0.026432196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049221754,0.00044727745,0.0002291675,0.00006148914,0.00004687676,0.0013382896,0.020552002,0.00024356433,0.0014746679,0.000083895706,0.9748459,0.00018466923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7069214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5295325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55025685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050530385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002378277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59175533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985759936","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv019","title":"Descriptive marks and the importance of counterclaims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Descriptive statistics; Business; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05782294030811143,"score_gpt":0.3172405990047298,"score_spread":0.25941765869661837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985759936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071278244,0.008033002,0.0035589247,0.092974134,0.0013482504,0.0006076609,0.0000057632824,0.00002098333,0.82217306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988877,0.0018169567,0.0014912481,0.0052722297,0.00043024032,0.0000018475964,2.3662557e-7,0.000009500067,0.0021007254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996994,0.0014044321,0.0005541528,0.00010361995,0.00074657274,0.0001971989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935415,0.0037952485,0.00075476227,0.00010530242,0.0016485893,0.0001546156],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0118737295,0.00010519447,0.0002986892,0.00003765121,0.0002618992,0.000092352915,0.0004101802,0.00025741974,0.00017249469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039309625,0.000048959897,0.000085371044,0.00017767522,0.001476875,0.0011970637,0.00006508907,0.0017346211,0.000014612446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015578041,0.00026802733,0.00044181838,0.000027784488,0.00048341329,0.000080216756,0.5072083,0.000013559065,0.00017332507,0.24348322,0.2258091,0.0064332327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009139379,0.00037765355,0.0000056280423,0.000079579375,0.00012420586,0.00032481452,0.11648515,0.00015029107,0.00024142352,0.0058579864,0.87534034,0.000098963494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006289774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010300232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9175988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013801419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007155377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96878266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988779473","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpp131","title":"Canada's Federal Court rejects American law of Fraud on the Trademark Office","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Read Jones Christoffersen (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Declaration; Doctrine; Law; Federal court; Political science; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03257852208952008,"score_gpt":0.29210527480559867,"score_spread":0.2595267527160786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988779473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021572433,0.00036353615,0.00016147783,0.14577469,0.0006936963,0.0006311993,0.000007288274,0.00003850207,0.83075714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496559,0.00028199976,0.0005831866,0.045421727,0.0006877799,0.000003040011,7.067493e-7,0.000036082725,0.003329605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324065,0.0023218493,0.0011687669,0.00033054134,0.0022102934,0.0007278918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98793733,0.008245068,0.0013570952,0.00042847992,0.0016965984,0.0003354337],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004118534,0.00036364785,0.000718155,0.000092790615,0.0013269006,0.00027607655,0.0013133027,0.00015538857,0.00090074586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027133984,0.00018817773,0.00027470698,0.00079744513,0.0015009444,0.00087343383,0.000059197242,0.001726199,0.0000620395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012099354,0.0017843101,0.000006051048,0.000032941596,0.00072223734,0.00031986105,0.04215676,0.00026195945,0.003138462,0.28561035,0.6269487,0.026919002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034020227,0.0034816447,0.000013365337,0.00015754724,0.00010319572,0.00019313669,0.0117657315,0.00010067725,0.0059808986,0.00041666336,0.9771233,0.0003236287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6893545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48600906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9280834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007613743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003770076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990037294","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpq218","title":"Methods of medical treatment still unpatentable in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Patentability; Allegation; Respondent; Law; Business; Estoppel; Patent infringement; Formulary; Political science; Law and economics; Patent law; Medicine; Intellectual property; Family medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.21113481399395895,"score_gpt":0.3562154891790996,"score_spread":0.14508067518514067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990037294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33768463,0.010703311,0.004555299,0.012921378,0.0023016413,0.00054993934,0.00007437047,0.000011716008,0.63119775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98739314,0.0029959006,0.0060266918,0.0032053434,0.00009609097,0.0000037638438,6.029229e-7,0.000020602425,0.000257873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978907,0.0001550762,0.0014065877,0.00017128864,0.00009949287,0.00027684506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997702,0.00090401387,0.00086109334,0.00017360061,0.000108493536,0.0002508144],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002375338,0.00014901794,0.00062607316,0.00014233273,0.000027923255,0.000025530606,0.0004027833,0.00008892915,0.003685544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031317926,0.000103610284,0.00011903529,0.00018426646,0.00007802339,0.0005543751,0.000069113354,0.00041060144,0.000055250992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00960143,0.008550559,0.0105687,0.00031973666,0.0039927443,0.0012095548,0.04234125,0.00062587095,0.00055798294,0.6550413,0.023898011,0.24329287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015869435,0.00093001977,0.00016141291,0.000052547464,0.000045311215,0.00033618484,0.0009989146,0.005384053,0.008597819,0.0052833464,0.97636527,0.00025815095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84497464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22326711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95246726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000816805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001197509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991455197","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpq027","title":"Hauling in the middleman: contributory trade mark infringement in North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Intermediary; Tort; Position (finance); Relation (database); The Internet; Business; Law; Jurisprudence; Strict liability; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.031061825961194653,"score_gpt":0.298923527095994,"score_spread":0.26786170113479935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991455197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3623171,0.0014181732,0.0005380663,0.0757987,0.002754844,0.0022086576,0.0000062236095,0.00007288602,0.5548854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98751104,0.00056094845,0.0012856562,0.009092804,0.0007816186,0.000019652618,0.0000012488509,0.000031930613,0.0007150962],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942227,0.0021702878,0.0012455069,0.0003021847,0.001311204,0.0007481254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243927,0.00587636,0.0006732404,0.00034389095,0.0004859515,0.0001812702],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007502075,0.0002813986,0.00050648896,0.00025669197,0.000533367,0.00036966705,0.0011690793,0.00019822411,0.0008618749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03305561,0.00015367562,0.00018943982,0.0011450239,0.00079808995,0.0015860536,0.000110858164,0.0031977745,0.00015132873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00861337,0.005085079,0.0012335841,0.00011593231,0.0004591773,0.0024901805,0.8348166,0.0007136351,0.005422146,0.01910564,0.043485165,0.07845952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007014338,0.00061378506,0.00014427325,0.00007683014,0.000050256378,0.00023038598,0.024771687,0.00024777648,0.0003371976,0.00013992366,0.97241884,0.00026757704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071012843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052751083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9289337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003376008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007840256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997833079","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpl174","title":"Digital technology: its impact on copyright law and practice in North America","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Deference; Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Fair use; Law; Legislature; Reservation of rights; Copyright Act; Fair dealing; Law and economics; Digital rights management; Copyright law; Technological change; Political science; Fundamental rights; Economics; Human rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.015442138898764142,"score_gpt":0.25736112903880065,"score_spread":0.2419189901400365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997833079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05151172,0.0017472795,0.00015290367,0.010843593,0.00034101095,0.0004892728,0.0000051433412,0.00010041016,0.9348087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98715955,0.00023081656,0.00030037138,0.009992159,0.00096454896,0.000007180972,0.000008315229,0.00006396628,0.0012730685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971906,0.00010422175,0.0010422512,0.00043093687,0.00067989243,0.0005520985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946278,0.002419858,0.0010675491,0.00030633432,0.0015257711,0.000052707874],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008706661,0.0004752237,0.0006277644,0.0006290459,0.0003287552,0.0012797844,0.00053836463,0.00018652907,0.0011255988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014553779,0.00025111446,0.0001837127,0.0014988125,0.00042646896,0.010999666,0.00025846914,0.0013262363,0.0009554768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.064743765,0.0126181,0.0008478451,0.00046866018,0.0016113073,0.0037623693,0.0033207154,0.0010981625,0.0046175187,0.045406315,0.6651534,0.19635187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009856791,0.0010820173,0.000039801056,0.00013707035,0.00014708961,0.00086789933,0.00091911963,0.003326986,0.0004421796,0.00066587754,0.99093527,0.00045099738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021308886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051765336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93564785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018840887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012776612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006002601","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpt098","title":"Licence agreement created sufficient standing to bring claim","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Agreement; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Tribunal; Action (physics); Service (business); Business; Public administration; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.017225734601366446,"score_gpt":0.260928702770591,"score_spread":0.24370296816922454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006002601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5287835,0.000110552675,0.0034734926,0.008483111,0.00044741138,0.0006309866,0.0000014319728,0.0000320875,0.4580374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784322,0.000043886695,0.00933564,0.0039647985,0.0001550144,0.000006918982,6.211203e-7,0.000023359144,0.0080375755],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735546,0.00020956132,0.0006940111,0.00026829276,0.0010951883,0.00037748602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979373,0.0008239381,0.00039826438,0.00021012468,0.00036039553,0.00026998113],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001074794,0.00020175068,0.00024327396,0.00007118994,0.00018333223,0.00029303716,0.00058607646,0.0000614669,0.023362331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00387006,0.00012816979,0.00009571642,0.00032090387,0.00014337315,0.0017908732,0.00036493718,0.00046781637,0.0083352495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058343997,0.005642129,0.004059445,0.000089408924,0.0011241398,0.0009211299,0.059979193,0.03165881,0.42633593,0.010032674,0.38456202,0.069760725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061538804,0.0024733169,0.0008190634,0.00029066176,0.000090453184,0.0010308684,0.0038519027,0.0039092116,0.04211374,0.00021926867,0.9440793,0.0005068467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057364134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018298904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55951726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007838137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003970383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013339843","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpr136","title":"Copy-right-brain v left-brain: the use of musicologists in Canadian copyright infringement cases","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Musicology; Expert witness; Witness; Political science; Law; Neuroscience; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.13310300948884002,"score_gpt":0.2632795194915544,"score_spread":0.1301765100027144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013339843","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21169265,0.0014221144,0.0005236903,0.07267889,0.0031927284,0.0024988921,0.000012453394,0.00011000471,0.7078686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623252,0.00008584834,0.0004286119,0.034433715,0.00055748847,0.000008952526,0.0000032843034,0.00005235512,0.0021045287],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965921,0.00027043527,0.0014120173,0.00034793298,0.00065400515,0.0007235311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935149,0.003108827,0.0011278634,0.0004874808,0.0016507662,0.00011015502],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026296289,0.00041017818,0.0006087539,0.00063963875,0.00039608084,0.00048928545,0.000990362,0.0001800954,0.01368813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02466632,0.00019782959,0.00024342287,0.0007788055,0.0005139798,0.0051628808,0.00028779046,0.0010266703,0.0003315196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035437944,0.0008505472,0.00082455453,0.00013535874,0.00032909802,0.0008775115,0.0057992395,0.00004680216,0.0005764252,0.0058421884,0.9759776,0.0051968736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064001576,0.0006001101,0.00018814481,0.00020123298,0.00014639024,0.000447415,0.0008927116,0.002659254,0.0020851137,0.0003232347,0.99146277,0.00035359556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4172555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32544574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7506326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032728055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059483544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033825676","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpi019","title":"Is a domain name property?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Tangible property; Analogy; Business; Domain (mathematical analysis); Property (philosophy); Domain name; Intangible property; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Political science; The Internet; History; Economics; World Wide Web; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09598108117061217,"score_gpt":0.2632499639064179,"score_spread":0.16726888273580576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033825676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0365014,0.0018330214,0.0027913905,0.060999524,0.0016533023,0.0009468166,0.000003455051,0.00017914553,0.89509195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8934806,0.00023248182,0.0044202767,0.07764812,0.005764023,0.000012501381,0.0000038408198,0.00011910046,0.018319048],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639255,0.00015292791,0.001306106,0.0004161763,0.0010722575,0.00065998593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99577904,0.0005477882,0.0011095189,0.0004063495,0.0020782223,0.000079086545],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002272588,0.00047559664,0.00061140046,0.000343214,0.00053356984,0.0008369692,0.0008692316,0.0002197747,0.007887843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058110612,0.00022742993,0.00038520744,0.0006548517,0.0002500531,0.0073886276,0.0003084318,0.0012846388,0.008421419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013561966,0.003178098,0.00009226916,0.00041628888,0.0011922583,0.0004681575,0.010904393,0.00026922434,0.006767616,0.010193405,0.7949062,0.1580501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011187373,0.0004321846,0.0000041503863,0.00023092236,0.00020644089,0.0008915763,0.0013280321,0.0026493329,0.0018304928,0.00069349003,0.9901291,0.0004855135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010819857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008567625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8767729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018084698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020138871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040771768","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpp123","title":"Respect for the commercial meaning of franchise restrictive covenants: do the UK and Canada diverge?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goodwill; Appeal; Meaning (existential); Covenant; Convention; Position (finance); Franchise; Law and economics; Law; Raising (metalworking); Business; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Marketing; Engineering; Finance; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03634100098975821,"score_gpt":0.3155342543875744,"score_spread":0.27919325339781614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040771768","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1438995,0.007995092,0.007920655,0.46675998,0.0015139137,0.0034308576,0.000077665354,0.00003101704,0.36837134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567264,0.00084674126,0.0003200392,0.002505048,0.00036896925,0.0000041583403,1.7090431e-7,0.000005365996,0.00027684728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858916,0.00031612482,0.00036068412,0.000095641306,0.00046037076,0.0001780337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991665,0.0069599734,0.00049212924,0.00013970495,0.0006688435,0.00007433785],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018429805,0.000084437524,0.00016794776,0.000018537554,0.0012978977,0.00014605308,0.00043396384,0.000042007334,0.00005164037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011213321,0.00003579006,0.00007088709,0.00019272183,0.00027008858,0.0004005084,0.000045162928,0.0004118656,9.4380226e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006231864,0.0005836725,0.00036423898,0.00002322945,0.00067213376,0.000027509117,0.1505787,0.0005575672,0.00075437315,0.57239896,0.17355421,0.09425354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003086454,0.00039384104,0.0004244605,0.000036699028,0.00013458476,0.000022638455,0.019653,0.00008123253,0.00022047138,0.0016626432,0.9769798,0.000082020706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44828916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35789156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85177314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013316229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009088086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048204967","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpm187","title":"Protection of shapes and colour marks in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Art; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.03271643170834253,"score_gpt":0.2861031483586044,"score_spread":0.25338671665026186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048204967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5023034,0.0016017766,0.0020827663,0.011718712,0.0010009948,0.0013428422,0.00000309857,0.000025656547,0.47992072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99610144,0.00035141,0.00093555474,0.0010540085,0.00020908641,0.0000026995858,1.4371022e-7,0.000020188796,0.0013254733],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966841,0.0007560666,0.0010042022,0.00019322606,0.00091578485,0.00044665753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99508804,0.0027429764,0.00068481505,0.00010333947,0.0011811907,0.00019960865],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059823347,0.00017219683,0.00039885074,0.00017649187,0.00027486132,0.00007131011,0.00035014117,0.0001454274,0.0005195849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022568371,0.000111318106,0.00006843046,0.0005584756,0.0004056587,0.0010188862,0.00007353277,0.00090297696,0.000008768563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.050296754,0.0029196823,0.0016487432,0.00061978365,0.001275325,0.0019473445,0.29363436,0.00051180413,0.03877565,0.038854048,0.045851354,0.52366513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008612834,0.0015215889,0.0002428229,0.00028340693,0.00008188081,0.0005825423,0.046218835,0.0005131084,0.010887236,0.00036880412,0.9380784,0.00036007355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9252661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9562294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89222705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011009166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033174502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98566496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051836811","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpq010","title":"Copyright Board of Canada sets tariffs for operators of 'game sites' at 0.8 per cent of revenues (in its simplest calculation)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Revenue; Business; On board; Operations research; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Industrial organization; Accounting; Mathematics; Engineering; International trade","score_opus":0.02922186042568718,"score_gpt":0.31903071876467004,"score_spread":0.28980885833898284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051836811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829886,0.00035844275,0.0004023501,0.0022482574,0.0009078552,0.00081292604,0.000039026825,0.0000051654206,0.012237383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592066,0.000054649376,0.00153009,0.00015611129,0.000121042394,0.00001274469,0.000008746926,0.000036828304,0.0021591194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969935,0.00039110763,0.0013856448,0.00023629506,0.00070850883,0.00028493485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942563,0.0016446338,0.0015702897,0.00034856363,0.0020617275,0.00011844828],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014786023,0.00021215378,0.0006236107,0.00015940181,0.00006805463,0.000020170613,0.0003799779,0.00014569818,0.0016529551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004151219,0.00014346516,0.0001507319,0.00023729175,0.00013816252,0.00046126402,0.000075129254,0.0004552138,0.000011572441],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.034254536,0.008639616,0.1272263,0.002428985,0.004876674,0.00032676166,0.075312376,0.005636316,0.2227371,0.027403167,0.479191,0.0119671915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027191043,0.0014080337,0.012323864,0.00028037507,0.0004289295,0.00024787398,0.0016898126,0.001027091,0.0644615,0.0001056526,0.91490334,0.00040441068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06120575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2631029,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43571237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028311522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006723305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99925965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052638931","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpt067","title":"Dexilant not an 'innovative drug' under Canada's Food and Drug Regulations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Drug; Business; Law; Medicine; Political science; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.3264991923773894,"score_gpt":0.4820656190096534,"score_spread":0.155566426632264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052638931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81029373,0.0012837985,0.00015084253,0.15780471,0.0014007741,0.0008523457,0.000051209372,0.000044842895,0.02811776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95427096,0.00023610612,0.0005022855,0.041700136,0.00050337706,0.000015172055,0.000005645083,0.000028141521,0.0027381924],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963533,0.0016377148,0.0008480552,0.00026526145,0.00039473566,0.00050091575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99331546,0.0033162292,0.00055024424,0.00017612956,0.001881591,0.00076032535],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017045222,0.000270464,0.00038149828,0.00008911161,0.00060772296,0.00010212602,0.00033159618,0.0002670415,0.0025742042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022304992,0.00017581748,0.000054891723,0.00035398558,0.00035238612,0.0014048783,0.0001015856,0.0033846633,0.000048523125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013537694,0.004518161,0.0010903584,0.0004460992,0.0042591277,0.00061837514,0.039086927,0.0021076417,0.057748552,0.05049719,0.67578083,0.15030903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012806829,0.00080326543,0.0002948889,0.000054165717,0.0002551462,0.0012391875,0.006625181,0.0021406827,0.033825148,0.00065827725,0.95245725,0.00036611696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06666141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054800022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27667642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027812913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014236209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053407589","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv015","title":"Remix prohibited: how rigid EU copyright laws inhibit creativity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Supreme court; Transformative learning; Flexibility (engineering); Law; Creativity; Law and economics; Political science; Fair use; Intellectual property; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06697947321749573,"score_gpt":0.26586302711600884,"score_spread":0.19888355389851312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053407589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016655473,0.0012971429,0.0019119215,0.02651953,0.0017106802,0.00081858586,0.000003082021,0.00020844066,0.95087516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96595454,0.00012199799,0.001587438,0.013517469,0.0041216975,0.000013235499,0.000009637546,0.00011849729,0.01455549],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995803,0.00028080205,0.0011638501,0.0005525536,0.0014841536,0.0007156513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916139,0.001077944,0.0015760938,0.00055013236,0.0050012283,0.00018069716],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032140377,0.0006092491,0.0008808996,0.00044787565,0.00046449443,0.0018232937,0.0009402711,0.00027082444,0.0033763892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027762568,0.00032763486,0.00037056635,0.0011705064,0.00042192292,0.012230099,0.0004673725,0.0015839221,0.0020188056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0054465802,0.001046181,0.000039774248,0.00013277913,0.00030542628,0.00028162362,0.0016281097,0.000014574543,0.003018776,0.0038496987,0.9761365,0.008099964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015174269,0.0008001801,0.0000038706603,0.00025749605,0.0003231792,0.000708372,0.001521911,0.0054388037,0.006163863,0.0012908948,0.98136646,0.000607537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016082828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024623453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94929904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032074485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046529082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064330952","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpu225","title":"UK claim construction: return of the Protocol questions and file wrapper estoppel","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Computer science; Protocol (science); World Wide Web; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Law; Doctrine; Medicine","score_opus":0.05652923007901374,"score_gpt":0.25014889886433267,"score_spread":0.19361966878531894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064330952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0240978,0.00022960162,0.003924872,0.022470383,0.0028802478,0.027536808,0.000021039914,0.00012436672,0.9187149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98296994,0.000022493085,0.002597635,0.0086776,0.0018384038,0.00070669124,0.000003435566,0.00005632065,0.0031274739],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808633,0.00020060127,0.00077749667,0.00020223534,0.00049284764,0.00024050375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963379,0.00085943815,0.0010691201,0.0002830232,0.0014176487,0.00003288884],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012382108,0.0002266981,0.00034123607,0.00012828149,0.0004585567,0.00026055946,0.00039722465,0.00011237648,0.004085837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011372549,0.00010860059,0.00016469703,0.00041286313,0.0004784068,0.0016370732,0.00022489864,0.0007707789,0.000121622674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014374051,0.0020783006,0.0023473522,0.0018997133,0.0011056864,0.000049865175,0.0048684785,0.00031105676,0.009833762,0.07989775,0.7668329,0.116401084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007801219,0.00029893153,0.00008505256,0.00045218773,0.0001528102,0.00064094015,0.0006664909,0.0023685948,0.0013672712,0.0015448789,0.9914299,0.00021279196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007337515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000079500176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95887214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035941957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011119331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079600733","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv073","title":"Trade-marks Opposition Board member erred in refusing request to amend statement of opposition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1174205592553423,"score_gpt":0.38161703012404447,"score_spread":0.2641964708687022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079600733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20066617,0.0008917907,0.0060660974,0.057990525,0.0022155158,0.0022819056,0.000013840635,0.000091036716,0.7297831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891975,0.0002420125,0.0061723376,0.002908971,0.00041885528,0.000011666698,0.0000037618393,0.000045121888,0.0009998045],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937372,0.0020717517,0.0016563316,0.0003383983,0.001620286,0.000576035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953584,0.0013092735,0.00095372245,0.00025673019,0.0016106848,0.0005112111],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074943244,0.00028544143,0.00059891463,0.00035225853,0.00028671924,0.00025749023,0.0005584207,0.00022464085,0.000510654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015350839,0.00019869042,0.00016264738,0.0008408935,0.0003816441,0.0027699997,0.000119476295,0.0008855427,0.00009604925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.039664913,0.0052921046,0.00004638115,0.00022239571,0.00087279006,0.00081925467,0.59103644,0.0041991817,0.07947258,0.019021938,0.19059798,0.06875403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001593462,0.0047546797,0.0000067196183,0.00076842884,0.00019296807,0.0003400141,0.03931771,0.00054388226,0.025667243,0.00069511455,0.92558336,0.00053642254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009711257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030368418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7885313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016413013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001272304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99688315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086860515","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jps134","title":"Keep it simple: fuzzy IP law for fuzzy folk","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Intuition; Liability; Simple (philosophy); Private law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Comparative law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05458303727363724,"score_gpt":0.3017906245631464,"score_spread":0.2472075872895092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086860515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012632901,0.004315443,0.32788992,0.020738412,0.004623047,0.0013880677,0.000011855091,0.00024077967,0.63952917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9140915,0.0004193121,0.04622462,0.031527855,0.0025081406,0.00003682435,0.0000039634,0.00010720898,0.0050805523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945855,0.0007463607,0.0016382943,0.0005607618,0.0011779342,0.0012911181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99020463,0.0048191203,0.0010959746,0.00092910836,0.0022332878,0.00071790646],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042319708,0.0005690093,0.0008482889,0.00018690372,0.0007865641,0.00080169307,0.0024142885,0.00030491126,0.00057095045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01195237,0.0003302397,0.00058243505,0.0006527257,0.00048005517,0.009237441,0.0005617008,0.0013261235,0.000620036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035426249,0.0026716655,0.0000080933205,0.00019091109,0.0010509979,0.00007901511,0.02288934,0.00007876016,0.0077585005,0.32463998,0.55615795,0.08093218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010986518,0.003056561,0.0000013112964,0.00009502325,0.00018812588,0.002200122,0.0009557473,0.002371149,0.01644673,0.006739363,0.9662256,0.00062157575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043846815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000073129646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9128282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003142219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005245309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088927141","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpm160","title":"Experimental use and patent infringement in Europe","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Science, Research, and Medicine","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Scope (computer science); Intellectual property; Legislature; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Work (physics); Business; Economics; Engineering; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.1453498866566028,"score_gpt":0.367527051628643,"score_spread":0.2221771649720402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088927141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710747,0.0020164966,0.0003863563,0.0027874466,0.00025713746,0.00033556603,2.333567e-7,0.000009877127,0.02313218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99167186,0.0009452162,0.0020368025,0.003882029,0.00023174565,0.0000015209837,4.1291622e-7,0.000015934147,0.0012144753],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793386,0.00013254474,0.0006028776,0.00017624215,0.00081729464,0.00033720533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975625,0.0008915022,0.00020423638,0.00014728568,0.0008318149,0.00036262657],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034368935,0.00013186719,0.00028521242,0.00024675028,0.000072996656,0.00006886719,0.00012228277,0.000049490933,0.00019411292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012315345,0.000068658286,0.00004206853,0.00045348346,0.00024525065,0.0008629925,0.000099759956,0.00066598324,0.000024470477],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.04498714,0.007091422,0.012367442,0.00022658681,0.00048474834,0.013812968,0.051820457,0.000016303542,0.77695,0.001456344,0.0152434455,0.07554314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054920707,0.0106928,0.007152092,0.00066861743,0.00012842382,0.009582517,0.015797779,0.00019538189,0.19348474,0.000007606525,0.7565599,0.00023808058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051000924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039699185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74131644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017008923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023817987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99600434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116043550","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpt160","title":"Third-party submissions for patent applications pending before the USPTO","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Incentive; Third party; Identification (biology); Business; Law; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Economics","score_opus":0.15127020908358804,"score_gpt":0.2698861085191365,"score_spread":0.11861589943554848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116043550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04255763,0.002354748,0.09230715,0.12354858,0.005693478,0.013037407,0.000019128607,0.00042136607,0.7200605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751722,0.00006671947,0.0014696143,0.014576427,0.0032872658,0.00024743413,0.000010808411,0.00006958043,0.005099931],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770665,0.00009090849,0.00090298604,0.00027120806,0.00054923963,0.00047901037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949175,0.0011322886,0.00091165886,0.00034934515,0.0026284165,0.00006079265],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016039863,0.00029879867,0.0003545281,0.0001610717,0.0011865376,0.00089529424,0.00077819667,0.00012941721,0.002422534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072487285,0.00013236023,0.00031646516,0.0004722317,0.00018182215,0.0037849618,0.00022582602,0.0007800753,0.0018160878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002814266,0.0019725878,0.0002384929,0.00053045264,0.0010441659,0.000024558156,0.0057328036,0.00034732113,0.005435817,0.050835583,0.8255751,0.10544882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000512447,0.00027192608,0.000025442563,0.00011067127,0.00026735096,0.00014200855,0.0028712263,0.005319136,0.00057839934,0.0034456938,0.9862222,0.00023346212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010901903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008016702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93261456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085674226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100197314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139621560","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpu009","title":"Supreme Court of Canada rules on substantial copying","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Respondent; Law; Corporation; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Trial court; Quality (philosophy); Copying","score_opus":0.037803621765421874,"score_gpt":0.24514033524277212,"score_spread":0.20733671347735025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139621560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117121205,0.0002206879,0.008087183,0.016228685,0.0038180721,0.0002865621,0.0000092251,0.00003947272,0.8541889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99023736,0.00003797214,0.0005926172,0.0065206066,0.0019951654,8.340018e-7,0.00000315949,0.000025161487,0.0005871326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980113,0.00006428741,0.0007024111,0.00015134717,0.00083659455,0.00023404654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963077,0.0012170504,0.00095232145,0.00015255845,0.0013416689,0.00002872832],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011582421,0.00017055514,0.00032293404,0.000108949855,0.00016409389,0.00018078717,0.0004295199,0.000058300928,0.0004996306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011042707,0.000107558844,0.000104170795,0.00012760579,0.00016119724,0.0013041405,0.00006430752,0.00039910604,0.000053499665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007020848,0.0012176742,0.00034892175,0.00041872048,0.0008165595,0.00017811623,0.00072337716,0.001714477,0.0055322126,0.6216969,0.35311845,0.007213747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006853206,0.0002785767,0.0000708975,0.00020099558,0.00013737618,0.0000896053,0.0004985493,0.0054329652,0.0029578002,0.001464433,0.9879636,0.00021983481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077441946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021973543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87311614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011638101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002549135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172477535","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv175","title":"Apportioning copyright damages: the case of ‘Blurred Lines’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Musical; Value (mathematics); Damages; Law and economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Intellectual property; Public domain; Asset (computer security); Law; Sociology; Business; History; Political science; Art; Computer science; Visual arts; Computer security","score_opus":0.06655268583662313,"score_gpt":0.28324781558360845,"score_spread":0.21669512974698532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172477535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1126176,0.0032572339,0.0056925127,0.015105763,0.0029668915,0.0009253499,0.0000029944406,0.00012230893,0.8593094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906481,0.000074421325,0.0006593673,0.004379158,0.0020304841,0.0000052848736,0.000002928883,0.00004966298,0.0021506185],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722296,0.00018435817,0.0013406851,0.00025487482,0.0006383406,0.00035876982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99225396,0.0012350001,0.0016748473,0.00042675986,0.0043376535,0.000071769224],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003733499,0.00031656408,0.00052570587,0.00024601037,0.0004013435,0.0005654997,0.00072811585,0.00012408222,0.0022068913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020880004,0.00014043378,0.00025872348,0.0008349119,0.00038987058,0.004884448,0.00030098433,0.00090719986,0.0004400013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061674425,0.0011803741,0.000038369497,0.00022700145,0.00064618175,0.0023709273,0.0068246783,0.00020731274,0.0023409673,0.0072508883,0.94086325,0.031882603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009820795,0.0004256441,0.0000024536332,0.00016249953,0.0004063491,0.0059850058,0.008483848,0.023427939,0.0019757017,0.0011002886,0.95674026,0.00030795133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031525164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023664007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8780305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009071926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031851995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327276894","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpt003","title":"Newsletter containing official mark held sufficient evidence of 'adoption and use'","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Intellectual property; Library science; Political science; Law; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.07487267601692686,"score_gpt":0.3219548643235617,"score_spread":0.2470821883066348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327276894","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8390055,0.0030087195,0.0076086237,0.03774424,0.0017750867,0.0019602717,0.00000263961,0.00008836541,0.10880661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98867935,0.00084980484,0.0031377114,0.004606713,0.0005796105,0.000007145009,3.3294236e-7,0.000033113887,0.0021062403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995294,0.0015309734,0.0011689069,0.0003006769,0.0011860024,0.00051945355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98799574,0.0076273833,0.0010136109,0.00024110332,0.0028546867,0.00026749264],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00392632,0.00025957116,0.00052489736,0.00018096033,0.0005651989,0.0005446524,0.0005164193,0.00022002804,0.0018476043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046081845,0.00016160672,0.00017673314,0.00044317002,0.0010059039,0.0046333047,0.00016579575,0.00093086966,0.00018591214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029301073,0.003551047,0.00081190333,0.0005409545,0.0016020598,0.00032313174,0.49377644,0.0007318476,0.1044967,0.047809307,0.17379312,0.1432624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010329182,0.0074302866,0.00014287251,0.0015506808,0.0003861453,0.000653344,0.04558238,0.0017313025,0.009226011,0.00033827205,0.9311204,0.00080537656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015845092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007465693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75732726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002707431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062053924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331213455","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpr193","title":"Recipe for a new tort? Common law right to privacy in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tort; Denial; Law; Economic Justice; Common law; Political science; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.11533280217112857,"score_gpt":0.3759141895787113,"score_spread":0.26058138740758274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331213455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18679021,0.001701553,0.0026201257,0.10928876,0.003466268,0.0018911139,0.0000028247073,0.00005335627,0.6941858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96694535,0.00007868347,0.011318573,0.00617473,0.0011917951,0.000009529867,6.2120654e-7,0.000021334774,0.014259368],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975241,0.00043237646,0.00068382727,0.00016745675,0.00061892497,0.00057330896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956438,0.002771687,0.00037345264,0.0001920818,0.00047421514,0.0005447848],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038599507,0.00016632558,0.00036872827,0.00009903935,0.00042722156,0.000218405,0.0005699375,0.00012732438,0.0010746884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007931197,0.00010678654,0.00015133768,0.0003074034,0.00014787554,0.0031448088,0.00009293313,0.0006866883,0.00017270318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012096484,0.0019151812,0.001129884,0.00005415903,0.00020110427,0.00010667728,0.47737914,0.00003996472,0.0012622322,0.21463975,0.2648173,0.02635809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003308621,0.000846646,0.000056849138,0.00016679149,0.00008393837,0.000120937184,0.0033800085,0.0000029909197,0.00071473594,0.0010113505,0.99309605,0.00018880832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42947307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.662481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7801552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008771778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010545041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476453766","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpw034","title":"On the superiority of the incremental costing approach in IP account of profits","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Activity-based costing; Context (archaeology); Intellectual property; Process (computing); Law and economics; Subject (documents); Economics; Actuarial science; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.041156026932214894,"score_gpt":0.23264303265106223,"score_spread":0.19148700571884733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476453766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9503267,0.00017374937,0.0001660174,0.0062713586,0.000319323,0.0004073802,0.0000028303225,0.0000057609363,0.04232692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99777305,0.000042464388,0.00010929896,0.0016576457,0.00025862263,0.0000044639796,1.7929659e-7,0.0000144225605,0.00013987547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818695,0.00012980333,0.000730553,0.000140172,0.00063100294,0.00018151388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962244,0.0013100688,0.0015681384,0.00024498586,0.0006431934,0.000009238934],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023232675,0.00015035961,0.00027169086,0.00006687701,0.00013036857,0.00006904095,0.00060713926,0.000057352958,0.00013890461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097787,0.000053278534,0.00012529825,0.00046024047,0.00020903486,0.0017540097,0.0002157717,0.00044463598,0.000016265833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03468584,0.011270147,0.078407034,0.0021100796,0.0012760004,0.0001406008,0.010215618,0.0006671343,0.30695567,0.42811182,0.049383663,0.07677639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012037005,0.0027540855,0.047417928,0.0127523905,0.0011163799,0.00081928744,0.02015116,0.0068410523,0.1714624,0.014928189,0.7075139,0.0022061802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013017027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016371644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6581303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008919799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001259627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99856234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481752133","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpw115","title":"Exhaustion of trade mark rights and parallel imports in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Doctrine; Legislature; International trade; Economics; Order (exchange); International economics; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02345914670480189,"score_gpt":0.26846207933356037,"score_spread":0.24500293262875847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481752133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4937535,0.0031015396,0.001675249,0.059577048,0.002197852,0.0015630893,0.000014336722,0.000047808986,0.43806958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99557203,0.00071150495,0.0008998484,0.00079974794,0.0002041084,0.000003164811,2.2829626e-7,0.000018975894,0.0017904182],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643904,0.0009296264,0.0010387362,0.00023181956,0.00092630455,0.00043448794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99525446,0.0032474604,0.0007158922,0.00017442125,0.00037012107,0.00023764567],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025690866,0.00020084715,0.0004552411,0.00012727048,0.00024126687,0.000053255375,0.0003750562,0.00013476316,0.00073550217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00961403,0.00009830148,0.00008527671,0.0003231868,0.00050980825,0.0014347631,0.00006176091,0.0004710215,0.000010197829],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.035558857,0.0032594332,0.00282338,0.00040947125,0.0016461083,0.0031886632,0.19575688,0.00020636272,0.034724608,0.08613611,0.3550005,0.2812896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011989797,0.0008745956,0.00016175362,0.0004577549,0.00009445741,0.00054518593,0.0055024675,0.000068874506,0.00526788,0.0020063128,0.9834558,0.00036597403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84015936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8421446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6284553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093274866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027085927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488364111","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpw091","title":"General Court dismisses Fútbol Club Barcelona’s application for registration of the outline of its crest","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Character (mathematics); Crest; Meaning (existential); Register (sociolinguistics); Function (biology); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Anatomy; Geometry; Epistemology; Optics; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.04732034850889414,"score_gpt":0.3437167768172868,"score_spread":0.29639642830839263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488364111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43296072,0.0022399658,0.08777743,0.25484103,0.0036499423,0.0057757865,0.00006701413,0.0000946552,0.21259345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906804,0.0004615972,0.0024380484,0.0003876883,0.0005411144,0.000011704038,7.0248484e-7,0.00001577589,0.0054629575],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781,0.0003234833,0.00080649956,0.00013946857,0.00074244157,0.00017808459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943273,0.0017769177,0.0016802187,0.00022148513,0.0019172241,0.00007683816],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028338672,0.00010610193,0.00024668773,0.00004112017,0.00023698018,0.000036506397,0.00047680765,0.00009735258,0.00012517678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019221917,0.00004858713,0.00015229924,0.00018923635,0.00040682926,0.0008185967,0.000041474792,0.00016725846,0.000005903247],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01058222,0.003568955,0.0016719691,0.0005537148,0.0008489816,0.000015439491,0.053008147,0.0006192893,0.4100153,0.23868413,0.14357854,0.13685328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005075951,0.0005396372,0.00025137837,0.0002594618,0.00013865976,0.000044735854,0.0016087672,0.00018147824,0.035077836,0.0008432964,0.9604183,0.0001288895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009405275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006729566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8168397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012057144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073153514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554574731","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv192","title":"Keyword advertising does not amount to passing off in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.036501715392244345,"score_gpt":0.27498646691166323,"score_spread":0.2384847515194189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554574731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15240587,0.0023749135,0.06253528,0.10541108,0.002049785,0.00064465374,0.000003919515,0.00010044468,0.67447406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97027797,0.000030113126,0.015920063,0.01290124,0.00004793951,0.0000011033208,2.2365913e-7,0.000011283674,0.00081004924],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794906,0.00034876008,0.0006162584,0.00016799831,0.00066388596,0.00025400502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973737,0.0009584497,0.00033328088,0.00044412506,0.00059465034,0.00029578464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012687629,0.00013634595,0.00023902749,0.00011386648,0.00007875491,0.00043733555,0.0012084672,0.000032428452,0.000024191597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006818949,0.00007510633,0.000046452613,0.00043831317,0.00003254808,0.002638656,0.0003762269,0.00050459034,0.00003364605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025434329,0.000944225,0.00016254764,0.000044094162,0.00019513798,0.0016801538,0.052383017,0.0028236376,0.004141744,0.020007292,0.042663846,0.8724109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044155997,0.0003581582,0.000044274686,0.00016051291,0.000010564471,0.00060515886,0.004563841,0.0039688163,0.0050444566,0.0001226536,0.9844495,0.00023052176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3801794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4887923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94178563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009192595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022738914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8163411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562068109","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpw174","title":"Canadian copyright law and the <i>Charter of Rights and Freedoms</i> : Statutory property rights trump constitutionally guaranteed expression","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Democracy; Freedom of expression; Realm; Law and economics; Property rights; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.012308475625481706,"score_gpt":0.20849054384247317,"score_spread":0.19618206821699147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562068109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038156617,0.0031145385,0.0010901028,0.023581842,0.0015503342,0.0016248648,0.000028234268,0.000075602555,0.93077785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872128,0.00013700272,0.0002947957,0.009086222,0.0007416898,0.000010653284,0.0000020397279,0.00003071396,0.002484092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970956,0.00025079877,0.001094219,0.00039449515,0.00068628707,0.00047860545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954465,0.0015875162,0.0008776183,0.00034841528,0.0016114576,0.00012850451],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018845142,0.0004124722,0.0006779299,0.0002637266,0.0009589714,0.00044878348,0.00054296595,0.00017645294,0.002442436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020747916,0.00012844992,0.0001773526,0.00025994325,0.002378962,0.004395876,0.0002091478,0.0005782171,0.00013024862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.029316034,0.00083682564,0.000064114814,0.00036316176,0.0011021481,0.00030588318,0.005314656,0.000003861563,0.034338918,0.3570691,0.56487507,0.0064102234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035041312,0.0002696194,0.0000058419328,0.00060635124,0.00025769157,0.0005169519,0.00020156267,0.0006974425,0.005879551,0.0106745,0.9770301,0.00035622896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13100047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038717926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94905615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012947428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035224075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611335951","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpx071","title":"Federal Court interprets Canada’s technological protection measures for the first time","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Education, Law, and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federal court; Political science; Law; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05993447584090487,"score_gpt":0.3286875154667891,"score_spread":0.2687530396258842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611335951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0068833525,0.0008160121,0.011225923,0.829124,0.0031439972,0.0020862971,0.0000065378986,0.00007750253,0.14663643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991197,0.00037076365,0.0006745103,0.0020396078,0.00096627546,0.00003073922,2.4738537e-7,0.000014060023,0.0047067893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983381,0.00028661956,0.00036891,0.00015072402,0.0005732579,0.0002823775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955376,0.0020617105,0.00071494246,0.00026418545,0.0013198704,0.00010170447],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004089385,0.00012581534,0.00020488689,0.00001850895,0.005409888,0.0006864344,0.0008992539,0.00015850543,0.00019298635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043625977,0.000063642605,0.00014708424,0.000064401866,0.0008533739,0.0009631556,0.000060903094,0.00049272913,0.000006378782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028074887,0.00092154485,0.00016843951,0.000054717762,0.0011306939,0.00002247638,0.098718904,0.00003459225,0.0007754884,0.02371248,0.7852063,0.08644682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019812498,0.0002677873,0.0000251638,0.000050619932,0.00006824082,0.00006909725,0.015863022,0.00040298828,0.0003387607,0.00053193077,0.9820675,0.0001167562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30880085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7133031,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98431367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047561395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022136858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99588495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616537111","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpx052","title":"eXtreme action against G-Force leaves them blushing in the locker room","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sign (mathematics); Intellectual property; Legal action; Business; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.10118829734194734,"score_gpt":0.298196843637976,"score_spread":0.19700854629602865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616537111","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8255995,0.001945707,0.009602955,0.007530063,0.0012820378,0.0004198409,0.0000014796512,0.00022220024,0.1533962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938703,0.0024133357,0.0025817365,0.00039901223,0.00023563509,0.000004533768,2.0943435e-7,0.000030111054,0.0004651318],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988808,0.000047732414,0.00041157467,0.00011544893,0.0002961422,0.00024829307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841106,0.00064198265,0.00034418888,0.00041346712,0.00015242504,0.00003685513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008937343,0.0001757084,0.00022775822,0.00006384056,0.00034389357,0.0002936813,0.0007310346,0.000120823315,0.000031971627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005267207,0.00008817351,0.000089560686,0.00009107516,0.00011164077,0.0023707002,0.00008031754,0.0012128991,0.000039417446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012866632,0.0004394992,0.00006525193,0.00014700858,0.00041482985,0.000679493,0.015630519,0.011293635,0.36049202,0.0019311769,0.017239964,0.59037995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009455361,0.00048233152,0.0001343812,0.00045359493,0.000091367096,0.0016835865,0.01622804,0.004976328,0.18428023,0.0017225813,0.7884956,0.0005063949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055472035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015102232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7712557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011540282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033301392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63057196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753771498","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpx140","title":"Trade mark-related developments in the United States Patent and Trademark Office: 2016–17","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Appeal; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Service (business); Marketing; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.08318936303791587,"score_gpt":0.32276671291121267,"score_spread":0.23957734987329682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753771498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22400561,0.00226441,0.00017189083,0.12442978,0.001493891,0.0018756181,0.000008678024,0.00007561741,0.6456745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98449033,0.0045144768,0.0006523709,0.0055004805,0.00020383867,0.000009485318,0.0000040242867,0.00003930664,0.004585681],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943773,0.0023281921,0.0011282025,0.0003246717,0.0011876123,0.00065403373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937026,0.0040362165,0.0010872557,0.0004111085,0.0005249093,0.000237921],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008157883,0.00032358567,0.00047328108,0.00022294417,0.0022323837,0.0010647638,0.0016121748,0.00026905633,0.00047857146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023858018,0.00016481518,0.00013502411,0.00042784144,0.0013621922,0.0021866842,0.00016205078,0.0016075084,0.000087489745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010054272,0.0025687986,0.00033053313,0.000109817,0.001258521,0.0012115908,0.69244164,0.00017967574,0.00070071523,0.015959201,0.21166888,0.06351636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010631838,0.0006679439,0.00038835595,0.00026765483,0.00012026115,0.00047251963,0.027535774,0.00034855827,0.00020676373,0.00042747732,0.9681625,0.00033905587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010446223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016591337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76048476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029470908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007373513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761143615","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpx168","title":"Federal Court of Canada: York University’s fair dealing guidelines not fair","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright Act; Fair use; Fair dealing; Agency (philosophy); Law; Copyright infringement; Interim; Political science; Copyright law; Common law copyright; Public administration; Intellectual property; Sociology; Good faith","score_opus":0.07551590696023368,"score_gpt":0.26623143024456697,"score_spread":0.19071552328433328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761143615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044952016,0.0007157748,0.0029563021,0.060123507,0.0032556835,0.00057370734,0.000009171209,0.000080945254,0.8873329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831033,0.00012173543,0.0012610385,0.0057703964,0.0017495095,5.703043e-7,0.0000021275569,0.000045470904,0.007945871],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971735,0.0000785407,0.0010670827,0.0003059623,0.0009199727,0.0004549777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922613,0.00063403294,0.0022586796,0.00051806145,0.004255217,0.00007274567],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016550332,0.0003406384,0.000636049,0.0001943078,0.00139191,0.0007620403,0.0014474096,0.00013365521,0.001740487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018780105,0.00020925529,0.00025485564,0.00022115673,0.00028147205,0.0047258935,0.0004742126,0.00073089893,0.00007740834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005261574,0.00027701227,0.00009274586,0.00017224888,0.00048672743,0.00029060643,0.00056396675,0.0001366741,0.0025623702,0.0036625399,0.97564244,0.01085109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008517683,0.00019773019,0.00004629265,0.0002822825,0.00021207475,0.00015504856,0.00246108,0.010163114,0.002698086,0.0001513289,0.9824199,0.00036130898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4081377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14306448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93815124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002541268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011133256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948179954","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpz067","title":"Court of Justice declares that Don Quixote may not be used on a label for cheese if it does not originate from the La Mancha Region","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; European union; European court of justice; Law; Political science; Business; European Union law; International trade","score_opus":0.07646994500697588,"score_gpt":0.28719679191137576,"score_spread":0.21072684690439988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948179954","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7897689,0.00011285195,0.000038543225,0.20635414,0.00044036665,0.00054901803,0.000053019176,0.000017946624,0.0026652617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906305,0.00051049393,0.00039876395,0.004444994,0.0005335543,0.0000073437786,0.000014175719,0.0000035583946,0.003456613],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801475,0.00042139296,0.0004973304,0.00024134987,0.00057874457,0.0002464581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899436,0.008458701,0.00080518465,0.00010893754,0.0005912165,0.00009234973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009630291,0.00021864488,0.00034952178,0.000012701434,0.00037094008,0.00012568818,0.0005066286,0.00018625856,0.00029951942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018651002,0.00004742642,0.00022317597,0.00020423027,0.00016493876,0.0007275142,0.00007566388,0.0005044633,0.000026783628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.025981355,0.0018960525,0.0002964232,0.00014095406,0.0009767747,0.000059237776,0.008690379,0.0003904792,0.8548771,0.018582173,0.05539032,0.032718763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008271763,0.0020163353,0.002445401,0.00029360942,0.00040865122,0.00015587041,0.009549171,0.00039367334,0.03293521,0.00019512682,0.9505101,0.00026971314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013118534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00070875563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8951197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007401892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000383146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32795277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999858947","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa006","title":"Key issues around copyright and social media: ownership, infringement and liability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Revenue; Social media; Business; Key (lock); Revenue sharing; Advertising; Internet privacy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Computer security; Law; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.05642769317203552,"score_gpt":0.2571169561906089,"score_spread":0.2006892630185734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999858947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3401836,0.008363986,0.0011630146,0.2714316,0.0019211099,0.001442856,0.0000069868024,0.0003068054,0.37518007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979845,0.0004209997,0.0005397432,0.015370453,0.0034970085,0.000004150349,0.0000027965496,0.000042510685,0.00027732563],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976179,0.00013006627,0.0008481263,0.00039785003,0.00064375036,0.00036232822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968837,0.0011444158,0.00065533066,0.00014482556,0.0010854327,0.000086333406],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014247692,0.00035168315,0.0005823295,0.00012991428,0.00048580585,0.0010471982,0.0003699351,0.000144054,0.0022125072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011535446,0.00019189507,0.00012848465,0.00035389044,0.0004447011,0.004735465,0.0004365932,0.00087591016,0.00020703515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.01716971,0.0013862038,0.000522757,0.0017980192,0.0012544211,0.00031094492,0.076712854,0.000009838984,0.00587338,0.021402858,0.81278074,0.060778294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008519861,0.00036399486,0.000041225612,0.00006675261,0.00028120496,0.00008691479,0.0057776044,0.004744871,0.0007026582,0.0011399303,0.98558396,0.0003588792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038375665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008875269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63966143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006657319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007659079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001659700","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa002","title":"All that glitters: Federal Court of Canada issues Canada's first website blocking order against GoldTV","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Order (exchange); Federal court; Law; Political science; Business; Supreme court; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04600213450797524,"score_gpt":0.28639320499091886,"score_spread":0.24039107048294361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001659700","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048759934,0.002071641,0.00061032514,0.6601064,0.001990146,0.00054865977,0.000017227245,0.000047575035,0.28584808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9700767,0.00044092486,0.001263764,0.026148513,0.0006036724,0.0000014155804,0.00000182156,0.00001969853,0.0014435338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968928,0.0004563953,0.0006379239,0.00017913546,0.0014844976,0.0003492542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615264,0.0013200337,0.0008408165,0.00012652362,0.001179299,0.00038071504],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096515013,0.00017543709,0.00037173962,0.000035231555,0.0005247318,0.0002018368,0.00047501858,0.00008839425,0.00066893554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011947052,0.00011589859,0.00008214062,0.00026466016,0.00016387223,0.0009788594,0.00007628602,0.0005108201,0.0000066522157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092650927,0.00010397851,0.00012508269,0.000050804647,0.00020979955,0.00017396084,0.026739765,0.0007361288,0.00081812876,0.00045087852,0.9685024,0.0011625374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037437346,0.0001661916,0.000013017489,0.00014707589,0.000041482697,0.00002706523,0.020374198,0.00081328925,0.0017691187,0.000014737344,0.976086,0.00017341529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98155564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92131674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004983968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004841236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99637574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012135415","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa011","title":"Is IP out of control?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Opposition (politics); Legislation; Law; Commonwealth; Copyright Act; Parliament; Intellectual property; Political science; Law and economics; Copyright law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0639044606991642,"score_gpt":0.2636796906152728,"score_spread":0.1997752299161086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012135415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010668617,0.0018255772,0.009248058,0.07661531,0.0016516965,0.00068189134,0.000005841031,0.000107291155,0.89919573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93741995,0.00011191326,0.00040304847,0.058764502,0.0022821077,0.0000021504645,0.0000011344903,0.00004843096,0.000966763],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733496,0.00009030154,0.0011978161,0.00028143887,0.0007608561,0.0003346482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515164,0.000841319,0.0012994548,0.00023767425,0.0023986236,0.000071307135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010512775,0.00030641357,0.0006797944,0.00015276944,0.00017118239,0.0003309953,0.00071544456,0.00012473768,0.010155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01469373,0.00016529112,0.00036965188,0.0004888189,0.00021085865,0.004163811,0.00019396191,0.0008028855,0.0015020872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011693548,0.0006655173,0.000057243262,0.00035114636,0.0007869339,0.00010418668,0.005840373,0.000029504568,0.013557457,0.002439623,0.94536054,0.019113904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013237642,0.0007406563,0.0000062770864,0.000110201705,0.00037187347,0.00005601769,0.0010261349,0.011660765,0.004746667,0.0003270689,0.9793485,0.00028208175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043665234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020700665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9267513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004410311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015041963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080762255","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa116","title":"Canadian implied renunciation theory with an implied licence-basis for recognizing the purchasers’ rights to patented products","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patent infringement; Product (mathematics); Patent Act; Jurisdiction; Renunciation; Law and economics; Business; Jurisprudence; Statutory law; Law; Economics; Intellectual property; Patent law; Political science","score_opus":0.12468319796708109,"score_gpt":0.24590539432856004,"score_spread":0.12122219636147895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080762255","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5296843,0.00053891377,0.018473461,0.30794904,0.0028419925,0.010049454,0.000044380606,0.00038010796,0.13003834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94895506,0.000012603803,0.0016691783,0.04680159,0.0020664372,0.000039278377,0.000018116494,0.00006816583,0.00036955462],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974607,0.00020625872,0.0007346114,0.00044779922,0.0005564485,0.0005941504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99495625,0.00092853466,0.00075629546,0.0003040826,0.0028737031,0.0001811177],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024107788,0.00035491012,0.00040296034,0.0002348471,0.0010554618,0.0007436948,0.0006978467,0.000117738535,0.00041781162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013556033,0.00016770508,0.00011919378,0.0009960396,0.00009111095,0.0030629209,0.00009482689,0.0006823169,0.00033857775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.25930846,0.0027872138,0.0002327993,0.0013724008,0.0047906465,0.00059573946,0.14208359,0.002967534,0.053629935,0.042634062,0.28611365,0.203484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013615568,0.0027990234,0.000026784885,0.00029124873,0.0006490884,0.00019314597,0.008799596,0.0031606227,0.007794704,0.0011368177,0.97309315,0.0006942633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029139739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020590074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68697953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022212946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000504056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121940187","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpq002","title":"Harnessing the development potential of geographical indications for traditional knowledge-based agricultural products","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Traditional knowledge; Indigenous; Agriculture; Business; Geographical indication; Geographical distance; Regional science; Political science; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.11125772001176205,"score_gpt":0.2540631882008878,"score_spread":0.14280546818912576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121940187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85640323,0.0006825187,0.020814454,0.042528216,0.006733385,0.0028368554,0.000014646721,0.00012110467,0.0698656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990876,0.000004642647,0.005388276,0.0014340521,0.002000817,0.000027403128,0.000020247597,0.000026103138,0.00022240986],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795985,0.00008200825,0.00090336433,0.00022542023,0.00053938857,0.00028996688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944843,0.0010585305,0.0010048217,0.00018507641,0.003234173,0.000033115906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019098676,0.0002306304,0.000293419,0.00022401127,0.00079236605,0.00033310952,0.0005660983,0.0001337129,0.0003527943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00815462,0.00010610148,0.00021841428,0.00062175374,0.0003593548,0.0016956257,0.00008103229,0.0009143884,0.000078113146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.028453628,0.021021752,0.00038463762,0.0030736406,0.0037047425,0.000050401315,0.017122252,0.0015887062,0.47239307,0.11992341,0.1738168,0.15846698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019038834,0.0005518981,0.0014102275,0.0003051201,0.00066130905,0.00037475713,0.0017947714,0.0041888556,0.032955535,0.00096622505,0.95431197,0.00057546835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007377696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007564648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78049517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031030002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045901648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97624314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124237478","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpq089","title":"Does listening to music excerpts online amount to fair dealing?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Cover (algebra); Active listening; Advertising; Internet privacy; Political science; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Law; Communication; Engineering","score_opus":0.027309509459939315,"score_gpt":0.2675682455213143,"score_spread":0.240258736061375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124237478","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70704323,0.000120732635,0.005048556,0.04090084,0.008451307,0.0013299135,0.000006945904,0.00026077288,0.23683767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93797505,0.000017795042,0.006665923,0.043926843,0.0067940904,0.000010946847,0.000004748054,0.00010130974,0.0045033097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965282,0.00007772918,0.0012601594,0.0005231848,0.00094191736,0.0006687946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945736,0.0009608337,0.0007505023,0.00051601324,0.0030091945,0.00018983669],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019284755,0.00048586703,0.0006456195,0.0005785823,0.00051800715,0.0012779051,0.0011324714,0.0001892999,0.0076247514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024337927,0.0002207053,0.00029245424,0.0010900119,0.00012977459,0.004362781,0.0006213716,0.0017263442,0.002059254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00956397,0.002078604,0.000070143884,0.00025650565,0.00049450377,0.00035155079,0.008137612,0.0001766471,0.23100433,0.0031475914,0.63127065,0.11344789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004977499,0.0005470396,0.00006244747,0.00020558164,0.00018526934,0.00021804536,0.001587696,0.0030263467,0.0027731438,0.00033294575,0.9900182,0.0005455578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033036054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026129573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3587475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012042335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018789702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131653929","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpab010","title":"Protecting Ghana’s intellectual property rights in <i>kente</i> textiles: the case for Geographical Indications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Intellectual property; Cultural heritage; Folklore; European union; Intangible cultural heritage; Ethnic group; Handicraft; Multinational corporation; Geography; Agriculture; Political science; Economy; Business; Law; International trade; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03741707969029026,"score_gpt":0.28939870234318216,"score_spread":0.2519816226528919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131653929","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7147722,0.0026616673,0.0101298485,0.08970133,0.0028156487,0.008054193,0.000029457073,0.00027307647,0.17156257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99261576,0.00004589585,0.0005076898,0.0050814226,0.0013157114,0.000058648893,0.0000066675107,0.000037585076,0.0003306331],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996749,0.0004803313,0.0011801963,0.0004127635,0.0005422215,0.0006354909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99263066,0.0033584393,0.00086683856,0.00037300892,0.0026959544,0.00007509043],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037601166,0.00035258557,0.00052279246,0.00026466924,0.0013859085,0.0009932811,0.00057466584,0.00020938803,0.00025617154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055448905,0.00016872618,0.00040970944,0.0015916335,0.00041730487,0.0028166445,0.00023780175,0.0016307753,0.00003787638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.031996097,0.03817694,0.0023957328,0.006243089,0.0071207755,0.02595128,0.30828983,0.0016893939,0.003274834,0.22549854,0.15196794,0.19739553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018268984,0.00053094345,0.00003417443,0.0003169568,0.00064254,0.0053294823,0.13590898,0.002062192,0.0004002163,0.0090444,0.84328973,0.0006134514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010133792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005124924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6913218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026259752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005227944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139155286","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa183","title":"The Australian tobacco plain packaging legislation: a case study on intellectual property enforcement and policy intervention to promote public health","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Intellectual property; Business; Legislation; Public health; Intervention (counseling); Tobacco control; State (computer science); Tobacco industry; Standardization; Sovereignty; Packaging and labeling; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.1339367764642654,"score_gpt":0.37012142231847023,"score_spread":0.23618464585420482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139155286","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1316433,0.00014779037,0.0014563292,0.8494877,0.0004993383,0.0019926748,0.0000024725223,0.000071479444,0.014698894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906936,0.000063981344,0.00019059483,0.10664031,0.001953358,0.00002508587,0.00000224787,0.000034163557,0.00039666498],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959629,0.00066179817,0.0015856661,0.00039776944,0.00056524196,0.00082661264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961673,0.0011416122,0.0012239002,0.00027828047,0.00089078024,0.0002980999],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006753732,0.00034422314,0.0005550493,0.0002752635,0.0011086332,0.0011346221,0.00047204946,0.00008613524,0.00013400528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03807818,0.00016404848,0.00014414074,0.0009980081,0.00013512096,0.0021644977,0.00043960373,0.00094025146,0.00014955361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003241729,0.0015138728,0.00019025424,0.00026365466,0.00060499826,0.00060234073,0.04215422,0.0005802681,0.000031738608,0.016529944,0.5807343,0.3535527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086528464,0.0033094578,0.000020928032,0.00009947062,0.00004289823,0.00112775,0.046420757,0.0028548425,0.00000360391,0.000047211688,0.9450046,0.00020321182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03569506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013898476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7590503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034796167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003955032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160375458","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa196","title":"Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Rules it can interpret contracts: rejects Goldilocks approach to jurisdiction  <i>Salt Canada Inc v Baker</i>, 2020 FCA 127, 28 July 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisdiction; Goldilocks principle; Law; Federal court; Political science; Taste; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.019796597576460375,"score_gpt":0.262074863091499,"score_spread":0.24227826551503864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160375458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039668456,0.0010551513,0.00197577,0.40146643,0.0025798222,0.001734981,0.00020800109,0.00008985309,0.55122155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707422,0.00052909256,0.0010140943,0.025344994,0.0014606501,0.000009932029,0.0000146893635,0.00004711042,0.0008372376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952609,0.00083717215,0.0013024658,0.00043925262,0.0014339203,0.00072630326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948053,0.0009047624,0.0007931653,0.00022777727,0.001672948,0.0015960527],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019158518,0.00035576205,0.00071117067,0.00011826796,0.0008451148,0.0003745375,0.000743865,0.00025434443,0.0003414069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007732173,0.00027604008,0.00018888374,0.000642735,0.0002251655,0.0010814536,0.000103285,0.0013374613,0.000036299207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004126535,0.00041859297,0.00010746256,0.00010062854,0.00066120864,0.00030611578,0.102415875,0.00034838144,0.0014426428,0.0012297253,0.8795663,0.0092765335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005738576,0.0011619692,0.000035940782,0.00014255189,0.00016335382,0.00021276568,0.012257998,0.00073043077,0.00055292394,0.00002371784,0.98378855,0.00035592413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96844065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9670793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9310737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015819166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009438537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206564096","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpab182","title":"The proposal for waiver of WTO’s TRIPS Agreement to prevent, contain and treat COVID-19: investigating the benefits and challenges for low- and middle-income countries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); TRIPS Agreement; TRIPS architecture; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Low income; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Business; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Law; Developing country; Virology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.08002614433161263,"score_gpt":0.3232760170172692,"score_spread":0.24324987268565657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206564096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07526183,0.031809464,0.0005595362,0.886717,0.00027777805,0.0028309554,0.000032114407,0.00001823576,0.0024930341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685312,0.019465834,0.005354048,0.0047218935,0.00033483625,0.000048141934,0.0000011303481,0.000030124302,0.0015128133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981306,0.00060029095,0.00048879004,0.0001863027,0.00037577236,0.00021822288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98935056,0.008809341,0.000484809,0.000110058616,0.0010119012,0.00023333062],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033033327,0.00013080762,0.00025382568,0.000032819917,0.001217775,0.00028277616,0.00018624397,0.00006132086,0.00002466178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032897398,0.00006531669,0.00004536625,0.00016246537,0.00066589075,0.00051602407,0.000088538785,0.0001636515,5.6630466e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002181952,0.00028036145,0.00019901223,0.00105641,0.0005205274,0.000011136542,0.1652074,0.000039818155,0.0005021242,0.8174001,0.001629096,0.010972043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001631793,0.001488655,0.00008785885,0.00053076196,0.00034585598,0.00020383271,0.05397829,0.00013012075,0.006850343,0.003133778,0.9313946,0.00022412947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024544168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040994207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92976546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010924472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010392836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97524893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236585934","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpm255","title":"In Person","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; The Internet; Competition (biology); Work (physics); Unfair competition; Business; Law; Intersection (aeronautics); Competition law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Management; Engineering; Monopoly; Computer science","score_opus":0.1264089556095902,"score_gpt":0.2717615841516081,"score_spread":0.14535262854201791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236585934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09903808,0.0007643339,0.002876715,0.008467159,0.0022257671,0.00040703887,4.324096e-7,0.00004951743,0.886171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97189486,0.000050280425,0.00069418055,0.02220252,0.0021333897,0.0000014438293,0.0000010438395,0.000042207033,0.0029800893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997766,0.00006629749,0.00084064767,0.00022122965,0.00061756064,0.000488273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971624,0.00094810344,0.00065912626,0.00018014293,0.0010119751,0.000038257214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040057753,0.00024862695,0.00036726528,0.00047296163,0.0001867038,0.0002915538,0.00044121055,0.00014562947,0.0020445713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094904,0.00014435875,0.00017100117,0.0007608586,0.00012455905,0.005293486,0.000099076875,0.0010154982,0.0015080618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07359372,0.00838416,0.0014155164,0.0010972321,0.0012684097,0.009373008,0.030655293,0.00063941494,0.03740012,0.076937206,0.58095115,0.17828476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009303365,0.00031200662,0.000052670715,0.00016078011,0.00008249301,0.00062220654,0.004043451,0.0008114809,0.0021600518,0.00042321498,0.9900978,0.00030346296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025356729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037558054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8831909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013435968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000801589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99926937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362668197","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad032","title":"Invoking Article 73 TRIPS in good faith: no recourse to ‘security exceptions’ for Russia’s violation of TRIPS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Faith; Good faith; Political science; Business; Law; Engineering; Transport engineering; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05062818481610564,"score_gpt":0.34595048058260947,"score_spread":0.2953222957665038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362668197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7009527,0.00029747264,0.0053729718,0.16229507,0.002943818,0.0033991248,0.000027818884,0.00024480053,0.1244662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99407357,0.00015823379,0.003301038,0.00069953536,0.00046705353,0.000012657772,0.0000023528028,0.000029034692,0.0012564961],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971072,0.00077144016,0.0009404626,0.00020034848,0.0006386925,0.00034185432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99520826,0.0026186514,0.00064783567,0.00015493491,0.0011875846,0.00018273243],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047061783,0.00013426172,0.00032184555,0.00031203122,0.00033389113,0.00013806256,0.00033808575,0.00012423814,0.0004884621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034010716,0.00010159161,0.000116409836,0.0019734043,0.00014589561,0.0016946385,0.000052180072,0.00042319568,0.0001878323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012248377,0.004718156,0.00322589,0.00030915148,0.0006512411,0.00010574224,0.47544292,0.0031732616,0.06036141,0.27584186,0.12217685,0.041745134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016254317,0.0010282708,0.0006625766,0.00025720437,0.000121015764,0.000031623633,0.018395582,0.0015556591,0.0061992705,0.0022031986,0.96761626,0.00030392176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00093924545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019972678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8454394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003002019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00052304246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9741262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366605994","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad038","title":"International investment law and data, copyrights and performance requirements: a closer look at <i>Einarsson v Canada</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law; Copyright law; Political science; Investment (military); International law; Volume (thermodynamics); Business; Physics","score_opus":0.045183140152419844,"score_gpt":0.26914031757511186,"score_spread":0.22395717742269203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366605994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07948626,0.00025161364,0.000036759437,0.018732194,0.0011927389,0.0003117668,0.000012135191,0.000045545403,0.899931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7555824,0.0006701566,0.00043402935,0.23812309,0.0011374438,0.000007206743,0.00008851422,0.00003402817,0.00392317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981623,0.00003967018,0.0005539393,0.00027008486,0.0007589824,0.00021499835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983847,0.00023365494,0.00053870963,0.00019810114,0.0005978392,0.000046976325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009268523,0.00018767337,0.00019873348,0.000121029865,0.00035433736,0.00040362,0.00043325138,0.000047080037,0.0003834966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073908834,0.00012079086,0.000028890998,0.00017944956,0.00017252617,0.005337992,0.0005672696,0.00026176812,0.0001267304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026559953,0.000344005,0.0003025607,0.00020174352,0.00068563287,0.00026561317,0.000612229,0.000059665195,0.0018693197,0.39532697,0.5963283,0.00134791],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006930092,0.00012054384,0.000049954582,0.00010049287,0.0000797863,0.0001865761,0.00021886286,0.014976949,0.0005286719,0.0004558656,0.98241466,0.00017463783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040420935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029499998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89600784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019715595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013738911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98820907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367395440","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad034","title":"Achieving a (copy)right to repair for the EU’s green economy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; International trade; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.13241053900580999,"score_gpt":0.2780996817719409,"score_spread":0.1456891427661309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367395440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03957009,0.001313057,0.014942279,0.27018473,0.0063618836,0.0051849196,0.000011571531,0.00092629716,0.66150516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8780604,0.00015518813,0.0016620188,0.09025566,0.007352753,0.00010209932,0.00000876214,0.00016448597,0.022238635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977286,0.00009346554,0.0008874292,0.0003283621,0.00041564883,0.00054652913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439037,0.0031034073,0.0006358124,0.0003614721,0.0014532869,0.000055681714],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034843187,0.00030945422,0.00041263792,0.0003390048,0.0008784145,0.0006315628,0.00081164285,0.00011332165,0.00092672644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011941304,0.00014911308,0.00042636314,0.00096514064,0.00010779914,0.0031253963,0.00035656753,0.0006614926,0.0031406118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008978136,0.0004337227,0.00005290405,0.0004955612,0.0012691112,0.00017698547,0.004325038,0.0010662304,0.0015833728,0.014159629,0.93840164,0.029057644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005011979,0.0003855948,0.000013559185,0.00015073553,0.00028022728,0.0001437877,0.0013681707,0.011285502,0.0003610061,0.00042451694,0.98479986,0.0002858318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014050166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001606158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8384903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009112896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012401573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379233554","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad047","title":"Implementing copyright revocation in Ireland and Malta: lessons for lawmakers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Auckland; National Library of Australia","keywords":"Revocation; Political science; Business; Computer science; Programming language; Overhead (engineering)","score_opus":0.05621843693672584,"score_gpt":0.3090988206149397,"score_spread":0.25288038367821386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379233554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25451225,0.0031706518,0.006587162,0.13410258,0.0034147198,0.0039782166,0.000014431779,0.00043676427,0.5937832],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918445,0.00045376088,0.0006970803,0.003519382,0.0010774985,0.000024609939,0.000011371356,0.000053324915,0.0023185166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978815,0.000066293724,0.00086815335,0.00029521566,0.00036235168,0.00052653597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968257,0.0014260131,0.00063717633,0.00016551427,0.00091111346,0.0000344679],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033861096,0.00023518168,0.0003857958,0.00044935016,0.00042775107,0.0005281043,0.0002858207,0.0001019749,0.000630909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0085711405,0.0001400752,0.0001223244,0.00085870246,0.000114041235,0.003707277,0.00022543191,0.0004653215,0.00020391107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008917645,0.00076144945,0.00043688554,0.0011214588,0.00053974736,0.00018650289,0.0059725055,0.000082590006,0.011329017,0.040861703,0.8130944,0.116696134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012029957,0.00022739434,0.00011708313,0.00019603923,0.00013058624,0.00009440959,0.0021895396,0.025048546,0.00051079306,0.0018922804,0.96812683,0.00026352727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009844338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006848786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7373322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081713595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000093321025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380089811","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad052","title":"Patenting human biological materials and data: balancing the reward of innovation with the <i>ordre public</i> and morality exception","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Psychology; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2805292259632416,"score_gpt":0.30365796945734225,"score_spread":0.023128743494100656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380089811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98170596,0.00010798505,0.00036379925,0.014081829,0.00018745963,0.00031386278,0.000004136657,0.000031708354,0.0032032828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961544,0.00013893627,0.00007571099,0.002874299,0.00056658086,0.0000039604997,0.000028681663,0.000017983513,0.00013944463],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998229,0.0002366025,0.00070012285,0.00022727097,0.00037528097,0.00023170626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967693,0.0007009314,0.001072908,0.00027537308,0.001168729,0.000012747751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061986702,0.00017016458,0.00027709134,0.00013548127,0.0006418632,0.0006418385,0.00042852553,0.000077996105,0.0001124633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064418437,0.00006281337,0.000023793891,0.0009254786,0.00034991428,0.002781644,0.00054520933,0.00041715734,0.000022618127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015335385,0.001324189,0.01008117,0.0022305162,0.0023445154,0.00022510362,0.014792679,0.00013585639,0.5877411,0.07617931,0.17618068,0.11342953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024440035,0.0014654751,0.0059889895,0.00084087875,0.0006813642,0.0009517483,0.019550173,0.0029419467,0.008692693,0.0023772614,0.9531925,0.0008730092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001108921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007983838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77701175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014373649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038421666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7711954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387843104","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad083","title":"Banking on IP?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.0739375612232151,"score_gpt":0.2766524172452645,"score_spread":0.20271485602204942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387843104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066643946,0.0012593255,0.0018288571,0.014329811,0.0018378289,0.00020463302,0.0000141059145,0.0000799809,0.9138015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9904751,0.00048453952,0.00043069568,0.0033516835,0.000323046,0.0000020887865,0.0000014519685,0.000022759508,0.004908622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865776,0.000050517705,0.0007554348,0.000175773,0.00012566146,0.00023485742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998272,0.00059780834,0.00065007346,0.00016717572,0.00022373909,0.00008919766],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001315464,0.00012649561,0.0003126825,0.0002176818,0.00015868287,0.00013063452,0.0002528833,0.00008186388,0.0010668929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008092752,0.00009097558,0.00016185764,0.000536659,0.000057588593,0.000692843,0.00004853841,0.00035879153,0.0043757637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010624283,0.00032485716,0.0001593201,0.000024754743,0.00016820992,0.00014049585,0.0022437288,0.00076498225,0.00012235742,0.8462034,0.12585253,0.022932941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032307688,0.0005828673,0.0002972535,0.00004450855,0.0000112585085,0.0001111156,0.00032591633,0.00057827303,0.0003188998,0.012381053,0.9848826,0.00014316128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013534672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008524418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92383116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011338628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052518484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390263545","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad113","title":"The stunted development of unfair competition law in the United States and Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unfair competition; Statute; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Competition (biology); Competition law; Common law; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Choice of law; Economics; Business; International trade; Market economy; Monopoly","score_opus":0.04188437057267157,"score_gpt":0.3016783232196145,"score_spread":0.25979395264694294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390263545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7205772,0.0008369085,0.0002694043,0.084335275,0.0010740953,0.0013764183,0.0000092364535,0.00006527615,0.19145621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939281,0.0012332528,0.00024775325,0.0034035617,0.00010187751,0.000007845638,0.000005260236,0.000017838403,0.0010545584],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995607,0.0018596324,0.00084835856,0.00014782898,0.0011370777,0.00040005785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98892814,0.009230224,0.0004670592,0.0001665438,0.00111187,0.00009614404],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066564186,0.00016013691,0.00025398674,0.00011064564,0.0013117009,0.00021128856,0.00066843437,0.000075241565,0.000083070765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010014076,0.00007109561,0.000047728252,0.0010142804,0.0008197651,0.00050462387,0.00010509135,0.0006998734,0.000018918881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0044828784,0.0006987201,0.000075641,0.00013043512,0.0007236458,0.00031371866,0.6482157,0.0008003493,0.001164015,0.2235762,0.10384834,0.015970329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025133943,0.0002271906,0.000025261008,0.00009858488,0.00002776458,0.000056285917,0.11064644,0.00042967827,0.00096645433,0.00036246746,0.88679063,0.00011789604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72108185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9091835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7829423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003448727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017338832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391045512","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpae001","title":"Protection against unfair competition—African Regional Intellectual Property Organization member states and South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Unfair competition; Competition (biology); International trade; Scope (computer science); Obligation; Convention; Customs union; TRIPS Agreement; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05232109075918227,"score_gpt":0.29699725789158976,"score_spread":0.24467616713240747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391045512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12030413,0.007970922,0.04119766,0.17595209,0.0024306243,0.0029008107,0.00005481586,0.0008832768,0.64830565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98584807,0.0021768606,0.0006729032,0.0013767702,0.000960647,0.000009867794,0.000007983196,0.00004909351,0.008897818],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965326,0.0011683387,0.00070914766,0.0003380393,0.0008675172,0.00038436113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957138,0.001894024,0.00038617387,0.00015454687,0.0015838662,0.0002676291],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022186562,0.0002516737,0.00036019363,0.0002736509,0.0009837179,0.0007772469,0.00029683716,0.0001787163,0.0010920969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010539897,0.00013902644,0.00014955261,0.0015390827,0.0006413632,0.0017896743,0.00008201398,0.00087154884,0.00017788615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022152644,0.0008101725,0.00002542254,0.0002823464,0.0017625376,0.00019854862,0.83181435,0.00057109736,0.0032785072,0.053142693,0.078341424,0.027557656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019333494,0.0005441201,0.0000016690695,0.00022255037,0.00026572894,0.0002024436,0.029937131,0.0015275052,0.00063774147,0.00059072324,0.96560806,0.0002690123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002953048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011759283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88726664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033649334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086385995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391357458","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad121","title":"Protection against unfair competition around the globe","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Unfair competition; Competition (biology); Business; Advertising; Law; Political science; Biology; Medicine; Ophthalmology","score_opus":0.0474353132957666,"score_gpt":0.2505299014048285,"score_spread":0.2030945881090619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391357458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016793095,0.0151942,0.14972636,0.058783025,0.0033995213,0.00054919603,0.000024467963,0.000118534845,0.75541157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99212426,0.0014061618,0.00036484632,0.0026182102,0.0008044853,0.000010001518,0.0000029718117,0.000023220118,0.002645863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844134,0.00015135625,0.00088310323,0.00021579926,0.00013538335,0.00017302194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857485,0.00041310824,0.00047849017,0.00020888314,0.00025139382,0.00007327493],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018930924,0.00014480541,0.0002958166,0.00019079504,0.0002423135,0.000489265,0.0002667709,0.00007228274,0.0015378358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015301339,0.0000844539,0.00028816776,0.00056328776,0.00009758586,0.0010873509,0.000041034968,0.00067611434,0.0015303488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007684517,0.00063994766,0.00002659721,0.0001630206,0.0015905198,0.00013855455,0.0044285883,0.0013295059,0.0011700788,0.9346613,0.032065034,0.023018371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015292627,0.00028222968,0.0000073758247,0.000090737325,0.00006266965,0.0003804892,0.0009499687,0.013546878,0.00033754174,0.0066661425,0.97737557,0.0001474468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031132967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005267306,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9753311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018793737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007434161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410286560","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaf031","title":"The compliance of the fair use clause in the South African copyright amendment bill with the three-step test and the constitution of South Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Compliance (psychology); Law; Test (biology); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04425567413726051,"score_gpt":0.23870074157778678,"score_spread":0.19444506744052628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410286560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.089949526,0.007350125,0.009720654,0.2974071,0.0018064802,0.008390486,0.000031266136,0.000081489525,0.5852629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513346,0.00013051761,0.00006928167,0.0034588252,0.00016131952,0.000022012933,4.3811008e-7,0.000015193425,0.0010089681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736166,0.00041991123,0.00089790195,0.00023861688,0.0007575198,0.00032436193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98970526,0.007016682,0.001429908,0.0006379493,0.0011933101,0.000016875096],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034524193,0.0002955648,0.00044236277,0.000103910534,0.0010559538,0.0006805063,0.0013518012,0.000070384034,0.00009945435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008419244,0.00006354283,0.00018341676,0.0011755825,0.002794217,0.0011802966,0.0003668504,0.0010319728,0.000013470651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.07948345,0.0043290746,0.0045221318,0.0010852318,0.0038719678,0.000085831634,0.16476828,0.000902006,0.003084364,0.23388715,0.47513267,0.028847836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023988828,0.00040592774,0.00032037287,0.0006903048,0.00074934505,0.000080084385,0.030189464,0.014238495,0.0006128387,0.0012840653,0.94877857,0.0002516585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002129002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015018559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9051839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006641096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024144648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412942271","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaf048","title":"<i>Say goodbye to my little FRAND</i> : is the withdrawal of the European Commission’s Regulation on standard essential patents a missed opportunity or a dodged bullet?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; European commission; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.07552407127873174,"score_gpt":0.26497380147683675,"score_spread":0.18944973019810502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412942271","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06854648,0.00024712106,0.0050108484,0.13343114,0.0027802296,0.0020621023,0.000018790803,0.000079028876,0.7878243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9505847,0.000032981414,0.00014116906,0.035499368,0.00059312116,0.0000058008363,0.0000029573018,0.000042957356,0.013096947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654377,0.00074209436,0.0010669286,0.0002944966,0.0010026922,0.00035003823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953565,0.0010923083,0.0010406368,0.00054833863,0.001891602,0.00007063994],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033053083,0.00033499667,0.0004552095,0.00019637264,0.0009464177,0.00046462403,0.0010344365,0.00010837072,0.001792586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0132722845,0.00013382253,0.00028835802,0.00096647715,0.00022602222,0.0009218398,0.00045272318,0.00096045516,0.00020044218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.048702974,0.0019405598,0.000120004865,0.00045172675,0.0010780111,0.00010273017,0.008603907,0.0003298183,0.012353599,0.0029427703,0.88990504,0.033468843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014674243,0.00057181274,0.00013425849,0.0009324877,0.0003246762,0.00005530266,0.0015287615,0.00065966166,0.010991646,0.00028777274,0.98280084,0.00024536852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00076393463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000104210754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88203824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010363121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039716982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99911994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413953126","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaf054","title":"Understanding technology regulation through history: insights from the legal history of the printing press and copyright in early modern England","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Printing press; Legal history; History; Copyright law; History of technology; Law; Political science; Intellectual property; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07216951159195743,"score_gpt":0.2750861957258497,"score_spread":0.20291668413389224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413953126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19598387,0.052770834,0.0046516643,0.05311765,0.003593243,0.0010133468,0.000002042823,0.000054924683,0.68881243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933628,0.000798955,0.00034762104,0.00075177796,0.00013392208,0.0000024019546,1.3362724e-7,0.0000063802777,0.004596032],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831676,0.000663467,0.0003777996,0.00013670886,0.0003682413,0.00013700481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976735,0.0013497167,0.0005112035,0.00015168382,0.00029228404,0.000021601167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086237746,0.00009690036,0.00019681851,0.000015054047,0.00034514905,0.000050274466,0.0003984044,0.00020093808,0.000031078456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031404237,0.00004494279,0.00007188702,0.0002005101,0.0010103581,0.0010045862,0.00009666808,0.0007922811,4.8539016e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005418451,0.00015106908,0.00027156094,0.000023524359,0.00019846567,0.0000068593395,0.5542839,0.000053924785,0.0020963321,0.40945113,0.032001916,0.00091947656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039431846,0.000057090663,0.000050413066,0.00019149653,0.00007998991,0.000008604237,0.01673791,0.000187927,0.0004149578,0.01805162,0.96375567,0.00007000833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058426955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035466868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93175375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015983459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064583233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8832447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}