{"meta":{"query_hash":"cae9e21d0b0c","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice"},"cohort_total":62,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":62,"exported":62,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/cae9e21d0b0c","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Intellectual+Property+Law+%26+Practice"},"results":[{"id":"W1686166217","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv206","title":"Remix allowed: avenues for copyright reform inspired by Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.019605561559631984,"score_gpt":0.2263162266808049,"score_spread":0.20671066512117292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1686166217","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030133424,0.004705765,0.011720465,0.19783977,0.0019113737,0.00036614927,0.00021631195,0.00033860042,0.75276816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64463365,0.0048290123,0.01589365,0.085635155,0.000808254,0.00031850394,0.00020095131,0.00020130885,0.24747951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98503464,0.0020503104,0.00044943168,0.0015798134,0.0065844962,0.0043013557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884319,0.0030839366,0.00040974002,0.001559412,0.0050249198,0.0014901627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010618848,0.0004406829,0.0004938429,0.0019451105,0.013280572,0.016583586,0.0034914766,0.010475861,0.013014475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02604327,0.00041326016,0.0010621601,0.0019235254,0.013116061,0.007940233,0.0066841296,0.009538618,0.0009913581],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019011155,0.000021935068,0.00026010323,0.00003967029,0.0000063431253,0.00021261768,0.0014130579,0.0004371269,0.00030265472,0.97096586,0.016271165,0.010050377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008363755,0.00004744908,0.0015456099,0.00044404934,0.000045223755,0.00015939209,0.0030543436,0.0021433306,0.0013171624,0.1849586,0.80606544,0.0001356796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8528188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85717475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14718121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06769217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13742675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49114335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1854973628","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv115","title":"Canadian Federal Court of Appeal denies further particulars in rare industrial designs action","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Action (physics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.2132789539531079,"score_gpt":0.3525633127651686,"score_spread":0.13928435881206072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1854973628","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031165227,0.001956866,0.005348555,0.27782804,0.005194617,0.00045094808,0.0017339534,0.0009048055,0.675417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.187117,0.0010550038,0.004924278,0.4249307,0.0014487542,0.00034287365,0.00064689375,0.0001812395,0.3793532],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9621828,0.0020985529,0.0014596137,0.004042988,0.020564765,0.0096513275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684211,0.012881126,0.0007851724,0.0019160834,0.012875016,0.0031215118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01765545,0.0011491145,0.001911984,0.002627232,0.041197207,0.01089019,0.006431713,0.044612575,0.017150164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039393123,0.002245767,0.0033313704,0.0024349287,0.009383384,0.0034245243,0.0051951585,0.026884323,0.0034173555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011529752,0.00009563689,0.0027497506,0.00013533435,0.00006587655,0.0019112553,0.0034102057,0.00039332613,0.0016201884,0.36908528,0.607068,0.013349694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016428024,0.00010866673,0.006951856,0.00031200255,0.00025329247,0.00051880523,0.001992918,0.0012804419,0.0014669058,0.021949997,0.9646954,0.00030538422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89054614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9600587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10945386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.050411217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14399768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36576068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1892605819","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv095","title":"Multiple patent challenges in the USA, Canada, France and the UK","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patent infringement; Patent troll; Political science; Law and economics; Patent law; Business; Law; Economics; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.24704630222532345,"score_gpt":0.2489858932559188,"score_spread":0.00193959103059535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1892605819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08882161,0.053255938,0.0010101023,0.37702626,0.0030299446,0.00012413594,0.0005055798,0.00014977837,0.47607666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79166067,0.020500876,0.0023379868,0.0674889,0.0013369984,0.00006676725,0.000273173,0.00009858511,0.11623612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.968697,0.0024709746,0.0013044474,0.002641142,0.016752368,0.008134068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9689049,0.011139106,0.0019384407,0.0008283345,0.009979019,0.00721007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012767797,0.0004323435,0.0009527448,0.005572812,0.021784352,0.025125364,0.0022826577,0.016135385,0.012626245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031718876,0.00057138427,0.0010877035,0.0057153646,0.0115015,0.006770315,0.006318405,0.008453449,0.0009700666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016761455,0.000077454635,0.0068683014,0.00032482267,0.000074102805,0.0069287545,0.008921528,0.0013900206,0.00077239366,0.6620727,0.21017872,0.10222359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006441522,0.00005321891,0.017740779,0.0008038939,0.000062058905,0.0015131588,0.009944342,0.00094313343,0.0005632427,0.023534138,0.94452745,0.00025018235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89632213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9391724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10367787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10212763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16585971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74099123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1937948075","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv092","title":"First comprehensive review of metatag liability by a Canadian court","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Federal court; Law; Court decision; Political science; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05952044708382473,"score_gpt":0.26998204153823485,"score_spread":0.21046159445441012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1937948075","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004593432,0.8329904,0.0014492149,0.044489715,0.0028556786,0.00033787172,0.0024422768,0.00012929922,0.11071201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.102584444,0.75623214,0.0059087398,0.104614414,0.0027401084,0.00042972976,0.002549442,0.00024140137,0.024699641],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96535015,0.002635825,0.0024852934,0.0019083758,0.024408208,0.0032122515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91025096,0.019433629,0.0029912042,0.002321707,0.063443504,0.0015589747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021319848,0.001652771,0.0025326877,0.026413217,0.010301968,0.0097508775,0.005764104,0.008854282,0.00535921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053251434,0.0018013073,0.003204417,0.01978737,0.0066083116,0.0038532545,0.0033500525,0.0077557536,0.0011466275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018534478,0.00006608898,0.0017284817,0.0118365325,0.0005892509,0.0007502041,0.0024638625,0.0006541939,0.0014994019,0.116966695,0.6462001,0.21705988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007168166,0.000054908945,0.0064305016,0.020563276,0.001093423,0.00026888918,0.0006597934,0.0001667997,0.000988908,0.0055261366,0.96401864,0.0001570846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9021271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9553359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09883798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09883798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24451736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7171231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1946532422","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv110","title":"Sweet success: ‘Valentine Secret’ not confusing with ‘Victoria's Secret’, rules Federal Court of Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Trade secret; Federal court; Law; Political science; Advertising; Business; Intellectual property; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03821629386603757,"score_gpt":0.289577209192768,"score_spread":0.25136091532673044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1946532422","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036324736,0.0053954767,0.0036302852,0.56680876,0.0028651145,0.00006955727,0.0001739422,0.00009453557,0.3846376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5447011,0.0012589721,0.0020139914,0.326299,0.0004979642,0.000051614992,0.00006878498,0.00011711984,0.124991484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869991,0.0027184514,0.00041627503,0.0014157279,0.0049723415,0.0034781396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902261,0.004425864,0.0004309816,0.0005230447,0.0028852362,0.0015088051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009965159,0.00038904307,0.0006695725,0.00092200533,0.03121562,0.014923765,0.002363723,0.016038844,0.0049997815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032879923,0.0006183379,0.00057485054,0.0013306165,0.022543486,0.0067231865,0.005120283,0.01878567,0.0006850359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026647194,0.000015437707,0.0010823236,0.000040003397,0.000018539406,0.0003583883,0.019068325,0.00009966425,0.00027213257,0.78374493,0.18769486,0.0075787315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003283934,0.00003032104,0.0035819504,0.00043052062,0.000049416114,0.00032911217,0.026193582,0.0005293197,0.0007956031,0.124717385,0.84310955,0.00020037324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7871851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9089787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21281493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024049675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06492881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42813647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966565519","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jps062","title":"Infringement for copying publicly filed court documents: class action certified in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Class action; Law; Corporation; Certification; Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Copyright infringement; Political science; Action (physics); Service (business); Business; Computer science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.12448166996967591,"score_gpt":0.37367744676494447,"score_spread":0.24919577679526855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966565519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6636771,0.0011352507,0.0011864094,0.037128594,0.00048226395,0.0010164023,0.0008719549,0.00013692307,0.294365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8297586,0.00076547475,0.0010246516,0.004688509,0.000118738,0.00017947702,0.00032896028,0.000054936234,0.1630806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98965585,0.00054545177,0.00046398453,0.0006921925,0.0043804524,0.0042620474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754885,0.0044021993,0.002577798,0.0013960424,0.0088190995,0.007316358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006480654,0.00032508728,0.0003475434,0.0018261011,0.021548826,0.0053104446,0.0026462828,0.004755261,0.014913514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022528438,0.0009190702,0.0005268086,0.0016701141,0.0043730424,0.0016238332,0.0037387467,0.0045372965,0.0010096937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009896415,0.0013133021,0.24115568,0.0005488615,0.00013791569,0.010571287,0.12446515,0.0009463267,0.011893828,0.09478701,0.28670937,0.22648166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004013294,0.00037763678,0.4314801,0.0004762429,0.00019279431,0.0011920307,0.036861245,0.002368171,0.006031794,0.0029604568,0.5173756,0.0002825813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98249567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099833004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099833004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20095055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7243425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966575687","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpn073","title":"Canadian Federal Court of Appeal confirms that irreparable harm must be demonstrated in injunction cases","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Harm; Damages; Interim; Federal court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Supreme court; Economics","score_opus":0.10254589870254925,"score_gpt":0.33497271280187485,"score_spread":0.23242681409932558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966575687","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034187313,0.0023593472,0.006381785,0.17216612,0.00347101,0.00041918852,0.0033159768,0.0007912415,0.77690804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40132523,0.0030230698,0.010013908,0.24249704,0.0009940233,0.00033153023,0.0013144716,0.00023200815,0.3402688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836073,0.0005202515,0.000624738,0.0012771714,0.009614516,0.004355977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98147166,0.0061219945,0.0002739798,0.0007075354,0.01015576,0.0012690342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008056552,0.0009929895,0.0011294548,0.0032848653,0.030737065,0.009045142,0.0048908517,0.023682613,0.0119773615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024277458,0.0013859516,0.002313381,0.002826622,0.0070640426,0.002297853,0.0027655975,0.019299861,0.0022266433],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008339677,0.000074285344,0.00485452,0.00013022384,0.00007032725,0.0017139075,0.004194361,0.0005826441,0.0013391806,0.4898186,0.48438287,0.012755664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015989007,0.00008002753,0.014764981,0.0004795339,0.00047799066,0.0006339577,0.003513059,0.0022417803,0.0033266176,0.032803614,0.94099295,0.0005255922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9786335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05244372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05244372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15359192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3805076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985759936","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv019","title":"Descriptive marks and the importance of counterclaims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Descriptive statistics; Business; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05782294030811143,"score_gpt":0.3172405990047298,"score_spread":0.25941765869661837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985759936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16983183,0.005324701,0.048530124,0.1933225,0.0018789471,0.00023041898,0.00031335576,0.00043198536,0.5801361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96376216,0.0008284344,0.00508576,0.01423225,0.000673498,0.00006896332,0.00003453819,0.00009238351,0.01522202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747849,0.005527819,0.0016430859,0.0028542804,0.012478904,0.0027110286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86078286,0.09897243,0.005983139,0.010031025,0.02242305,0.0018073848],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030276665,0.00044176323,0.00081737613,0.0032993145,0.00895014,0.012531549,0.004924435,0.018046172,0.006475581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14245464,0.00089915254,0.00059750734,0.0023150393,0.033906523,0.01360284,0.0036957227,0.01645932,0.00081237475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043520387,0.00001491236,0.00079126965,0.00004631105,0.000009095448,0.00037729423,0.003273183,0.00017161264,0.0004430566,0.98148465,0.0057851616,0.0075599486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018000098,0.00008245235,0.003685205,0.00076072087,0.00013564852,0.00088834966,0.0066346065,0.0043140803,0.005962994,0.85442317,0.12274784,0.00018485499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09404273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114519574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012637568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019146008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18699068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988779473","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpp131","title":"Canada's Federal Court rejects American law of Fraud on the Trademark Office","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Read Jones Christoffersen (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Declaration; Doctrine; Law; Federal court; Political science; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.03257852208952008,"score_gpt":0.29210527480559867,"score_spread":0.2595267527160786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988779473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042428486,0.0019054118,0.003887941,0.30740377,0.0029522066,0.00014072887,0.0014033061,0.0003676385,0.6395105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.395125,0.002107942,0.0045105987,0.26811558,0.0007331528,0.00017778069,0.00050773186,0.00013746426,0.3285848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861063,0.0006998847,0.00040378654,0.0006391988,0.0076428754,0.004508037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98676723,0.0042176647,0.00041566338,0.00039385512,0.0072287736,0.0009767099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00533578,0.00057558605,0.00075316546,0.0023119168,0.027927227,0.009440806,0.0023463536,0.01508964,0.006052523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01913634,0.000837372,0.0015515471,0.003297344,0.0067503303,0.002279763,0.0025875964,0.012128085,0.0011213345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006120051,0.0000464989,0.003524519,0.000044522658,0.000024710454,0.00037793856,0.0035345026,0.0002967488,0.0004697154,0.6605941,0.31714183,0.013883668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007497294,0.00003851437,0.005983469,0.0002196607,0.00015208487,0.00016429154,0.0023279162,0.0011443619,0.0013608393,0.02462704,0.96376485,0.00014205155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97589034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98949105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05377089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05377089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15605153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3901369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990037294","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpq218","title":"Methods of medical treatment still unpatentable in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Patentability; Allegation; Respondent; Law; Business; Estoppel; Patent infringement; Formulary; Political science; Law and economics; Patent law; Medicine; Intellectual property; Family medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.21113481399395895,"score_gpt":0.3562154891790996,"score_spread":0.14508067518514067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990037294","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05134399,0.07853496,0.013484644,0.15778168,0.0031830438,0.0006643837,0.0019270672,0.00029626014,0.692784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57175314,0.04665074,0.023873016,0.04255289,0.0016202619,0.00048370633,0.00083798997,0.00022096303,0.3120074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910547,0.0010401759,0.0003505564,0.0011259593,0.0048303893,0.001598287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99326384,0.0020362847,0.00042498295,0.00063730247,0.0022453014,0.0013923006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005181711,0.0004811083,0.0007119454,0.0025224558,0.008721685,0.008980245,0.002214621,0.0048760837,0.02040232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012578794,0.00069977617,0.0011977536,0.0033641674,0.0074630734,0.0024482263,0.0032806466,0.005457864,0.001013684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023656599,0.00015224882,0.0043191793,0.00057973986,0.000074292904,0.0007692708,0.00237179,0.0010568767,0.00081294315,0.7818921,0.06041468,0.14732029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002110678,0.00012894135,0.014516913,0.0006094625,0.000100364006,0.00064761506,0.00085479766,0.0016614328,0.0009238302,0.03460229,0.9456351,0.000108089276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.967556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.980409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11076116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11076116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20292597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8036322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991455197","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpq027","title":"Hauling in the middleman: contributory trade mark infringement in North America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Intermediary; Tort; Position (finance); Relation (database); The Internet; Business; Law; Jurisprudence; Strict liability; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.031061825961194653,"score_gpt":0.298923527095994,"score_spread":0.26786170113479935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991455197","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6298984,0.011232269,0.00097117986,0.087647,0.0005457024,0.000054419237,0.000081399456,0.00003303125,0.2695366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516092,0.005862447,0.00039808732,0.016563207,0.00015230615,0.000020502805,0.00003001438,0.00001592075,0.025348263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979906,0.00030257768,0.00006867964,0.0002671989,0.0005668172,0.00080420345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674916,0.0011893547,0.0005429885,0.000102520375,0.0007334718,0.0006824086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019073661,0.00017102486,0.00031957476,0.0017413326,0.020290243,0.0051638028,0.0009978528,0.004362784,0.005213098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043331184,0.0002821473,0.00025869513,0.0019214362,0.0090971505,0.0027634902,0.0039721206,0.0054189526,0.000223944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011335724,0.0003187821,0.07885751,0.00018991441,0.000041420226,0.017940907,0.32392764,0.00031295535,0.0011517447,0.4149092,0.066058375,0.09617826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003758957,0.00007564939,0.115388915,0.0007379982,0.000080060105,0.0054954966,0.21415082,0.0006538539,0.0008415361,0.03130546,0.63108724,0.00014542279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7993178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9303072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20068222,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02339538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030353844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40372813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997833079","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpl174","title":"Digital technology: its impact on copyright law and practice in North America","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Balance (ability); Deference; Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Supreme court; Fair use; Law; Legislature; Reservation of rights; Copyright Act; Fair dealing; Law and economics; Digital rights management; Copyright law; Technological change; Political science; Fundamental rights; Economics; Human rights; Right to property","score_opus":0.015442138898764142,"score_gpt":0.25736112903880065,"score_spread":0.2419189901400365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997833079","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27083245,0.051142115,0.0006031126,0.18811789,0.0008755212,0.000047108217,0.00027340764,0.000068045185,0.48804027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287187,0.012772298,0.0006009089,0.01630552,0.00056768855,0.00007058118,0.00010115129,0.000023759132,0.04083944],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964497,0.0008787319,0.00021519512,0.00057659653,0.0012136879,0.00066612544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986329,0.0070048063,0.0016223482,0.0005388563,0.0027933673,0.0017116059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035093867,0.00013052662,0.00022870436,0.0029304593,0.011131646,0.00979023,0.0009641328,0.004029042,0.011425937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012710238,0.00024632606,0.00025427397,0.003992944,0.011798784,0.006694243,0.004995044,0.003006026,0.0005304918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000830581,0.0002431812,0.024302648,0.00030082485,0.000021425174,0.0012712375,0.052778084,0.00030116513,0.0007990458,0.73614687,0.06138463,0.12236786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036683257,0.00006536579,0.17328915,0.0009584067,0.00003263202,0.00049969245,0.048313458,0.00050724985,0.0005415739,0.06961963,0.7060574,0.000078719975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31184074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46476898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31184074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025858272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02183602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62005126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2006002601","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpt098","title":"Licence agreement created sufficient standing to bring claim","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"International Maritime Law Issues","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Agency (philosophy); Agreement; Government (linguistics); Law; Political science; Tribunal; Action (physics); Service (business); Business; Public administration; Sociology; Physics","score_opus":0.017225734601366446,"score_gpt":0.260928702770591,"score_spread":0.24370296816922454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2006002601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043594513,0.00039007037,0.012806839,0.0362959,0.0025286134,0.0009640221,0.0005854807,0.0004927525,0.9023418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61820436,0.0002674839,0.005476824,0.042453967,0.0019153795,0.0010364763,0.00040658,0.00020870243,0.33003023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709066,0.0025090694,0.001959066,0.0032828415,0.011157474,0.0101849735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767419,0.0072488263,0.00077175314,0.0029658985,0.009999436,0.0022721516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01532526,0.000861013,0.001595752,0.0038476356,0.013668667,0.011750093,0.0032650058,0.027633365,0.036507383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05417681,0.001509182,0.0019758483,0.0013194694,0.0071543125,0.0075212587,0.009241076,0.017275775,0.013120352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018519696,0.00032250537,0.0023531008,0.00008927238,0.00005730927,0.0022538553,0.0050927363,0.00024111703,0.0026283578,0.8968156,0.07364206,0.01631878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032829618,0.00049605744,0.008160514,0.00057108665,0.00028331566,0.0016843491,0.0050689722,0.0024324327,0.0050485,0.17001052,0.8055338,0.00038212523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053188447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06561897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053188447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009209701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032616958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12212944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013339843","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpr136","title":"Copy-right-brain v left-brain: the use of musicologists in Canadian copyright infringement cases","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Musicology; Expert witness; Witness; Political science; Law; Neuroscience; Psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.13310300948884002,"score_gpt":0.2632795194915544,"score_spread":0.1301765100027144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013339843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51668644,0.004781264,0.0021277447,0.07936268,0.0004388974,0.00012515101,0.00027980813,0.000055057284,0.39614287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831828,0.0013630593,0.00052800967,0.006259307,0.00006135906,0.00001689754,0.0000325928,0.000013749453,0.008542185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907828,0.0012517675,0.00036072105,0.00062758656,0.0037638964,0.0032132154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98281026,0.009426932,0.001336584,0.0007667905,0.0038140025,0.0018453955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057989326,0.00037154,0.00036190852,0.00246356,0.021526523,0.0049169757,0.0024861833,0.007633619,0.0070743486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042116918,0.00034891264,0.0003311596,0.0033410613,0.010576096,0.002566166,0.004334993,0.0053192447,0.00034802002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028757434,0.00015261624,0.07804962,0.0004582775,0.00010554434,0.039305415,0.13206264,0.0010381651,0.002765188,0.5178675,0.10240683,0.1255006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002442689,0.00017224564,0.19262867,0.0020316015,0.0007198254,0.028101763,0.23743139,0.0044412185,0.0076810005,0.048191037,0.4776972,0.0006599023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94850963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98456913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051490366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037593156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06732185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27275872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033825676","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpi019","title":"Is a domain name property?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Context (archaeology); Tangible property; Analogy; Business; Domain (mathematical analysis); Property (philosophy); Domain name; Intangible property; Law and economics; Law; Computer science; Political science; The Internet; History; Economics; World Wide Web; Linguistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09598108117061217,"score_gpt":0.2632499639064179,"score_spread":0.16726888273580576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033825676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063711447,0.01901577,0.007764641,0.27111086,0.004331672,0.00003054226,0.00026068944,0.00008997912,0.6910246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69177014,0.021861572,0.0057618534,0.14184034,0.016007958,0.00020271399,0.00059176603,0.00020917533,0.12175448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98953515,0.003772508,0.00066899374,0.0027085207,0.0022031837,0.0011117415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796291,0.01196239,0.0017118335,0.002462168,0.003286623,0.0009478319],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009185258,0.0003458958,0.00078005483,0.0019190639,0.008631887,0.013806469,0.002043251,0.011848308,0.023059426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028466718,0.0003916824,0.0005706161,0.0024832427,0.033817478,0.023472,0.0044176485,0.011691698,0.0050690714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003686854,0.0000050311974,0.00010449543,0.000021962125,0.000001577679,0.00012796481,0.00076933287,0.000011923464,0.000023951485,0.9801379,0.01545409,0.0033381283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007939925,0.000010569594,0.00038662984,0.00032589168,0.000007933401,0.000708452,0.0016993708,0.00010296858,0.00011234264,0.5005484,0.49607155,0.000018028608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076376046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046732933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023059426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005349106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055239443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.077141464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040771768","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpp123","title":"Respect for the commercial meaning of franchise restrictive covenants: do the UK and Canada diverge?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Goodwill; Appeal; Meaning (existential); Covenant; Convention; Position (finance); Franchise; Law and economics; Law; Raising (metalworking); Business; Political science; Economics; Accounting; Marketing; Engineering; Finance; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03634100098975821,"score_gpt":0.3155342543875744,"score_spread":0.27919325339781614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040771768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22110787,0.00974049,0.003993983,0.29832795,0.0005434993,0.000054067736,0.00035659192,0.000041528812,0.46583405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702481,0.0016565823,0.00061150565,0.01710165,0.00006153746,0.000016321987,0.000049568083,0.000024456911,0.010230212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98726684,0.0020904893,0.00047584504,0.0011449392,0.004695175,0.0043267678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9822474,0.00569084,0.001396628,0.0010216618,0.007031791,0.0026116697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077923434,0.00022947082,0.0008334924,0.0015772441,0.014805126,0.019336801,0.0024133734,0.009705511,0.004185309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03140148,0.00042481575,0.00046419248,0.0039667985,0.036489844,0.008329805,0.0045052203,0.00974188,0.00043169982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060940547,0.000015065787,0.004241919,0.00005398735,0.000019227144,0.00029246358,0.030691233,0.00015677007,0.0002152651,0.9394566,0.0124600325,0.012336527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013924859,0.000061415834,0.052465394,0.0020806375,0.00017478633,0.00060950796,0.14981407,0.0014766393,0.000979503,0.41090745,0.38086244,0.00042888106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9619592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9746276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061983068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061983068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14330144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44972068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048204967","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpm187","title":"Protection of shapes and colour marks in Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Art; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.03271643170834253,"score_gpt":0.2861031483586044,"score_spread":0.25338671665026186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048204967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06493625,0.0009927857,0.0047395285,0.011635979,0.00025132744,0.00023161781,0.0013139462,0.00024054211,0.91565806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67607206,0.0010908116,0.003995874,0.0086299805,0.000059906648,0.00013416987,0.0006638015,0.000089855945,0.30926356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918686,0.00045584847,0.0002540348,0.0006386099,0.0044943737,0.0022884468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918739,0.0009959629,0.00041629773,0.0011461742,0.0045824866,0.0009851075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023548075,0.0004486959,0.00038826815,0.0011593872,0.011195279,0.0063746516,0.0028189165,0.0037552372,0.014073912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009143635,0.00061411806,0.0006775897,0.0018819538,0.006233332,0.001897674,0.0038956609,0.0038155778,0.0020341994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001699747,0.00007710955,0.009053174,0.00014107936,0.00003320355,0.00093869615,0.010194495,0.001181546,0.0027615349,0.83583426,0.077502064,0.062112898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005937958,0.00008426833,0.017721146,0.00039756257,0.00007771941,0.00049058005,0.0040297136,0.0023380395,0.0034985926,0.031398922,0.93970937,0.00019484025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9802563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042451642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042451642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13575521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30800968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051836811","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpq010","title":"Copyright Board of Canada sets tariffs for operators of 'game sites' at 0.8 per cent of revenues (in its simplest calculation)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tariff; Revenue; Business; On board; Operations research; Computer science; Microeconomics; Economics; Mathematical economics; Industrial organization; Accounting; Mathematics; Engineering; International trade","score_opus":0.02922186042568718,"score_gpt":0.31903071876467004,"score_spread":0.28980885833898284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051836811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038885232,0.0015061063,0.014121257,0.011649965,0.0020119746,0.0010599127,0.010472172,0.0027233274,0.91756994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27028456,0.0018781816,0.024021657,0.008349635,0.00023797264,0.00053389475,0.006938207,0.0007221852,0.68703365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930335,0.000302303,0.00013622019,0.00023891615,0.0053312783,0.00095771375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888075,0.00081806903,0.00025575605,0.00041777955,0.008892929,0.00080786843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024122451,0.00091006956,0.00039560348,0.0044634826,0.004500306,0.0047008125,0.0024526862,0.0030904924,0.02448917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00951981,0.0006540979,0.00091669225,0.0023337742,0.0017618663,0.0012359128,0.0010455408,0.0028428652,0.005541954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020528326,0.00023826554,0.01102323,0.0003155234,0.00009180092,0.00031799276,0.0008099328,0.0021590672,0.005774388,0.16935012,0.678298,0.13141637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066164816,0.00010163599,0.025239507,0.00017113502,0.000062797546,0.00023447289,0.00056344614,0.0033833154,0.0027958977,0.0057914583,0.9614558,0.00013435169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90968543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9432521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98379934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016200684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048528258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18169284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052638931","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpt067","title":"Dexilant not an 'innovative drug' under Canada's Food and Drug Regulations","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare","field":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Drug; Business; Law; Medicine; Political science; Pharmacology","score_opus":0.3264991923773894,"score_gpt":0.4820656190096534,"score_spread":0.155566426632264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052638931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035219792,0.007303855,0.005815438,0.28389132,0.005428654,0.0005079346,0.002225658,0.0006123823,0.65899503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27281114,0.0050819,0.009536137,0.45326048,0.0016853785,0.000264952,0.0007120763,0.0001391107,0.2565088],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98429793,0.0008104013,0.000727513,0.0013488987,0.010040492,0.0027749126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98318547,0.0049093463,0.0007426077,0.0007146678,0.008758006,0.0016898772],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052947905,0.0004912143,0.00069769926,0.00097013544,0.009079321,0.006543653,0.0019359066,0.015305341,0.0056144646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013009771,0.00074820436,0.001078805,0.0011391247,0.0056485385,0.001901063,0.0013306874,0.008643378,0.0016499622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025053366,0.00015319548,0.005132845,0.00031618727,0.00005638671,0.0014333179,0.0023982506,0.0003977592,0.004203874,0.35670266,0.5840767,0.044878293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001452513,0.00012970681,0.006300049,0.0004522397,0.00011956036,0.0005115602,0.00066299964,0.00064068264,0.0020348136,0.008770227,0.9801025,0.00013030092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82777566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.937415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9742792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025720753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11807366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34647715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053407589","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv015","title":"Remix prohibited: how rigid EU copyright laws inhibit creativity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright law; Supreme court; Transformative learning; Flexibility (engineering); Law; Creativity; Law and economics; Political science; Fair use; Intellectual property; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.06697947321749573,"score_gpt":0.26586302711600884,"score_spread":0.19888355389851312,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053407589","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44614148,0.0007842486,0.0050942637,0.011542482,0.00010646192,0.00006549902,0.0000761021,0.00013213804,0.53605735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98797,0.00019621648,0.000734354,0.0010108594,0.000021882339,0.000024869161,0.00002319487,0.00004759102,0.009971097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884604,0.0048443587,0.00045539124,0.0013086994,0.0026618335,0.002269253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9552266,0.029292347,0.0040799533,0.0061857365,0.0036864525,0.0015289206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012798053,0.00023649611,0.00036590506,0.0014592793,0.006083369,0.014774567,0.0013424136,0.0028906404,0.01674216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06166179,0.0002203272,0.0005860053,0.0014170342,0.011807779,0.005890815,0.0048339064,0.0027788945,0.0014180493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017713412,0.00016264696,0.018771742,0.000115694966,0.000036091293,0.00092362036,0.026647493,0.0015001021,0.0012030735,0.88021487,0.010182901,0.060064644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002722103,0.00037052634,0.08091227,0.0012349451,0.0001626394,0.0013348066,0.078553595,0.007874882,0.0068350374,0.4240919,0.39818144,0.00017578034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034201875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031001752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034201875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005558661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076077487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06800556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2064330952","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpu225","title":"UK claim construction: return of the Protocol questions and file wrapper estoppel","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estoppel; Computer science; Protocol (science); World Wide Web; Library science; Information retrieval; Political science; Law; Doctrine; Medicine","score_opus":0.05652923007901374,"score_gpt":0.25014889886433267,"score_spread":0.19361966878531894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2064330952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034321323,0.0039170105,0.0387277,0.09538903,0.002805722,0.00042177102,0.00043061835,0.0006152131,0.8233715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.692647,0.0025536374,0.022484722,0.060461096,0.002237663,0.00087083306,0.0004829046,0.0005502181,0.21771196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9503718,0.01706592,0.004573146,0.0055487603,0.017135656,0.0053046388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9211793,0.055086873,0.002371336,0.010470101,0.009660649,0.0012317426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028978363,0.0007089299,0.00088449375,0.0025701688,0.007361521,0.017533723,0.0035151425,0.022435794,0.019941943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10119526,0.0011231798,0.0014611788,0.0017191799,0.013294238,0.017120788,0.013538102,0.015365024,0.006910177],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006975438,0.00002208626,0.00061276724,0.00008579076,0.000009190125,0.001047896,0.0035253211,0.00011818671,0.00044242342,0.94883883,0.026789162,0.018438706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113767834,0.00020787983,0.0030759897,0.0011445762,0.00009185371,0.0025959306,0.0037975921,0.0014113077,0.0042651384,0.27571672,0.7073728,0.00020640377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022664936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019725107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028978363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010641164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012033201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15325403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079600733","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv073","title":"Trade-marks Opposition Board member erred in refusing request to amend statement of opposition","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1174205592553423,"score_gpt":0.38161703012404447,"score_spread":0.2641964708687022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079600733","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16193144,0.0021400754,0.021218596,0.47192615,0.03567964,0.0022630158,0.0013301135,0.0017325885,0.30177838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3231871,0.0007486357,0.00944389,0.45218647,0.004904941,0.0011309756,0.00038203676,0.00043132025,0.20758457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9395894,0.006919833,0.006841285,0.0077445777,0.025530785,0.013374074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9319451,0.034611207,0.0025389448,0.0033646654,0.02239245,0.0051475307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040134747,0.0012069131,0.0020554576,0.0026183608,0.019850275,0.01094388,0.0074742353,0.06347714,0.006615079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11594271,0.00185718,0.0034059223,0.001754348,0.005499882,0.0029355504,0.006760217,0.042450752,0.0039727623],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007967079,0.0005754485,0.009854021,0.00039900618,0.00029569276,0.01883463,0.011435476,0.0013242486,0.01101361,0.22386165,0.68565834,0.035951182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004455602,0.00079996005,0.013289582,0.0006055756,0.00071289664,0.002169174,0.009952798,0.005543598,0.009903609,0.02601351,0.9298055,0.0007582361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11379195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19370499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11379195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018401532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03983528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22625917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2086860515","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jps134","title":"Keep it simple: fuzzy IP law for fuzzy folk","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Law, AI, and Intellectual Property","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legislature; Intuition; Liability; Simple (philosophy); Private law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science; Comparative law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05458303727363724,"score_gpt":0.3017906245631464,"score_spread":0.2472075872895092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2086860515","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01321786,0.0030413268,0.44299757,0.023660403,0.0018320754,0.00018584497,0.0007464844,0.00059128023,0.5137272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66528606,0.0024589445,0.17425495,0.012339948,0.0035268804,0.00074101635,0.0005921556,0.0005403295,0.1402597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986022,0.00032894476,0.00007202243,0.00033072894,0.0005451306,0.0001209932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977234,0.0011068347,0.000109406996,0.0003957404,0.0005560636,0.00010850776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023946897,0.00037593054,0.0005674525,0.0014539438,0.0032332619,0.005431143,0.0013073687,0.0022797459,0.020782558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009450974,0.0002942162,0.0010120402,0.001032208,0.009131378,0.008583201,0.0020651163,0.006092438,0.0036621965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004369392,0.0000038614025,0.00004169349,0.000012153567,0.0000017097067,0.000044763867,0.00019684799,0.00029587492,0.000051690728,0.99249285,0.0035716176,0.0032825915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004410471,0.000004686517,0.000062184714,0.000025712157,0.0000020936266,0.00005347586,0.000058330956,0.0034995757,0.0000644943,0.9768767,0.019342363,0.0000060839257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005519292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032612216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020782558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033361458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015716411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069524586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2088927141","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpm160","title":"Experimental use and patent infringement in Europe","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Science, Research, and Medicine","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Timeline; Scope (computer science); Intellectual property; Legislature; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Work (physics); Business; Economics; Engineering; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.1453498866566028,"score_gpt":0.367527051628643,"score_spread":0.2221771649720402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2088927141","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0502219,0.13495122,0.009600423,0.13925476,0.0031304972,0.00018619758,0.00029341187,0.00013805696,0.6622234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77163565,0.033617616,0.0063010957,0.1251145,0.0039115814,0.00045713468,0.00020599624,0.00009269247,0.058663733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9600529,0.016899759,0.0044499375,0.004976904,0.009916216,0.003704386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87390107,0.096037574,0.007914584,0.012313952,0.007956389,0.0018764681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057300486,0.00040323776,0.0014326777,0.004388093,0.0059873695,0.01658889,0.002501228,0.028443975,0.0093038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08055474,0.0008958746,0.0019444532,0.003489347,0.027255103,0.010715148,0.008924553,0.009943678,0.000924682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082870254,0.000036515965,0.0007415082,0.00014994491,0.00002777882,0.00035574965,0.0009949008,0.0002015093,0.00040891592,0.9667252,0.010595316,0.019679742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016540952,0.00055697554,0.008405234,0.0018531986,0.0001552433,0.0011809493,0.0013469096,0.00065980194,0.0024350835,0.41745582,0.56561,0.00017529474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007819669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005179278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057300486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007834191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063177077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30303758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116043550","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpt160","title":"Third-party submissions for patent applications pending before the USPTO","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accreditation; Incentive; Third party; Identification (biology); Business; Law; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Economics","score_opus":0.15127020908358804,"score_gpt":0.2698861085191365,"score_spread":0.11861589943554848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116043550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012338101,0.0019332127,0.01933495,0.02715405,0.030806672,0.010139627,0.0073139947,0.00536138,0.885618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062009737,0.0018888846,0.01826484,0.015428866,0.009021955,0.0046615046,0.0050666383,0.0019103056,0.8817473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9619749,0.0076787085,0.0042467737,0.0023470724,0.020320764,0.0034316757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8176527,0.05129946,0.0078202,0.039467856,0.07712745,0.006632385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034445435,0.0013216012,0.0016274482,0.007239156,0.009010618,0.0102737015,0.0032528793,0.012065186,0.17223735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16387461,0.0013031834,0.0023818223,0.00508015,0.002437172,0.004378377,0.0054912977,0.0061244615,0.16565241],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019928782,0.00023421549,0.00086384884,0.00037574102,0.00003182711,0.0015344743,0.00062378176,0.000057421174,0.0035906192,0.021333685,0.90326554,0.06788957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010625087,0.00024480582,0.0028702624,0.00039341272,0.000024945417,0.00072299765,0.0005289935,0.0004982327,0.002791637,0.0086987475,0.9830247,0.00009500607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034320236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008333421,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17223735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034819266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014041079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5761913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139621560","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpu009","title":"Supreme Court of Canada rules on substantial copying","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Law, logistics, and international trade","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Respondent; Law; Corporation; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Trial court; Quality (philosophy); Copying","score_opus":0.037803621765421874,"score_gpt":0.24514033524277212,"score_spread":0.20733671347735025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139621560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027153471,0.0027116912,0.004093264,0.068061374,0.0019561935,0.00053907285,0.0030887946,0.0003275684,0.89206856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40524313,0.0034146153,0.0060294163,0.1317034,0.0010983935,0.000692184,0.0013791373,0.00025168693,0.450188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721851,0.0013200302,0.001289078,0.0025098193,0.015051501,0.0076443763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771136,0.0061675515,0.00061144587,0.0019277679,0.012690422,0.0014893723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009477441,0.00083021435,0.0012096064,0.0027227092,0.021010406,0.013501395,0.0046846517,0.017787179,0.012584907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036394235,0.0016927078,0.0015150893,0.0036707697,0.008892582,0.0026750597,0.0037397435,0.013969109,0.0031058444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060111786,0.000046175493,0.002603708,0.00006846315,0.000042685355,0.000581065,0.0027053687,0.00036007067,0.0006009978,0.7380682,0.2442466,0.010616486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014585262,0.000047537647,0.0082198195,0.00067193276,0.00022895694,0.00029074273,0.0021423956,0.00124951,0.0015332679,0.058963135,0.9262651,0.00024173218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9363279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.967702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.063672125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042867288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17467411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31102538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172477535","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv175","title":"Apportioning copyright damages: the case of ‘Blurred Lines’","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Musical; Value (mathematics); Damages; Law and economics; Quarter (Canadian coin); Intellectual property; Public domain; Asset (computer security); Law; Sociology; Business; History; Political science; Art; Computer science; Visual arts; Computer security","score_opus":0.06655268583662313,"score_gpt":0.28324781558360845,"score_spread":0.21669512974698532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172477535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600515,0.0010191633,0.0019365764,0.007362131,0.000036559108,0.000065208595,0.000049758473,0.000015261672,0.029463932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660873,0.00030661453,0.00042300476,0.0009960094,0.000038160197,0.00002795952,0.000017494767,0.0000041248827,0.0015779122],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97677565,0.009202094,0.0013685578,0.0018489235,0.007711353,0.0030933686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87679166,0.07384959,0.029123632,0.009597289,0.00786076,0.0027771036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015078554,0.00030046792,0.00048646197,0.0032880518,0.0082802,0.0075563216,0.0021610002,0.0072238767,0.0038875476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1288679,0.00065889524,0.0003009952,0.003858568,0.012546284,0.010799518,0.0068905675,0.0071996134,0.00037830396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00063843955,0.0006838188,0.19662781,0.00029269155,0.00011561308,0.031784378,0.37006336,0.0025817908,0.0026233685,0.25147337,0.015217284,0.12789807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002019401,0.0009427906,0.2382329,0.0015734747,0.00017882834,0.020500911,0.4689664,0.009473394,0.0077710534,0.10487052,0.14670543,0.0005823909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015148197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01876301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015148197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004410166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032394736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07974398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2327276894","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpt003","title":"Newsletter containing official mark held sufficient evidence of 'adoption and use'","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Intellectual property; Library science; Political science; Law; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.07487267601692686,"score_gpt":0.3219548643235617,"score_spread":0.2470821883066348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2327276894","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073597697,0.006220056,0.0012273695,0.08738959,0.035227913,0.00042413175,0.02944529,0.0023347903,0.830371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05202782,0.0072414232,0.0024046942,0.025795048,0.026884576,0.00089320866,0.020054782,0.0016537217,0.8630448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99161196,0.0011889257,0.00070298143,0.0004467816,0.0052104737,0.0008389012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93350846,0.034015268,0.0052817967,0.005257847,0.017509354,0.0044272025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076910746,0.00045335185,0.0008928989,0.004526345,0.0024191053,0.0074796043,0.0012716105,0.005797753,0.26518497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052019577,0.0006729958,0.00071615627,0.0037914377,0.0014433827,0.0052046995,0.0020091448,0.0035764733,0.12624668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005446969,0.000024999143,0.0002595822,0.00016308206,0.000003871162,0.00008036927,0.00015329626,0.000005650391,0.00013279471,0.0014893401,0.9872929,0.010339712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027767901,0.00007546644,0.0039509116,0.00035007342,0.000012050691,0.00009054237,0.00035451495,0.000037220903,0.00035451038,0.000556568,0.99416995,0.000020537387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049619083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009232166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26518497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016857738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004193143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8871321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2331213455","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpr193","title":"Recipe for a new tort? Common law right to privacy in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Tort; Denial; Law; Economic Justice; Common law; Political science; Liability; Psychology","score_opus":0.11533280217112857,"score_gpt":0.3759141895787113,"score_spread":0.26058138740758274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2331213455","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0817294,0.006109788,0.003736,0.51995325,0.0011248976,0.00018667676,0.0007865819,0.00007089783,0.38630256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76967674,0.006613138,0.0059042564,0.064150885,0.0004971664,0.00010176274,0.0003229099,0.00007278025,0.15266044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421847,0.0005248947,0.00023342384,0.00051938446,0.0026375526,0.0018663767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99441165,0.0012474897,0.0003926797,0.00045886452,0.0020274322,0.0014618679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030102145,0.00026766624,0.0004046452,0.00087864377,0.017183842,0.007284127,0.0015227775,0.0062768017,0.009239296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009790105,0.00058984035,0.0006445902,0.0014702149,0.011144198,0.0042309044,0.003448784,0.005284834,0.00057053455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009382899,0.000039528182,0.010493147,0.00013978679,0.00003313458,0.0013885698,0.013076161,0.00050221535,0.0011394098,0.8004936,0.14904705,0.023553653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087188455,0.000037455437,0.026749566,0.00046988807,0.00007593009,0.0005659444,0.011064951,0.0009081807,0.0005891536,0.07817233,0.8811029,0.00017650993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9826105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9940088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10160618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10160618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17383854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7372079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2476453766","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpw034","title":"On the superiority of the incremental costing approach in IP account of profits","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sophistication; Activity-based costing; Context (archaeology); Intellectual property; Process (computing); Law and economics; Subject (documents); Economics; Actuarial science; Business; Accounting; Law; Political science; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.041156026932214894,"score_gpt":0.23264303265106223,"score_spread":0.19148700571884733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476453766","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06984169,0.00332586,0.1143062,0.04161047,0.00077138754,0.00017981093,0.00016336037,0.00023873273,0.7695625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654777,0.0008198877,0.012262929,0.0033753074,0.00086852507,0.000095490475,0.0000358942,0.00011345335,0.016950792],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9837781,0.005017861,0.00066322327,0.0016797488,0.007748354,0.0011126916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97606,0.015029506,0.001770754,0.003104929,0.0037259148,0.0003089818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012824419,0.000546621,0.0006160725,0.0024359422,0.003859259,0.010498717,0.0031539355,0.005941292,0.007290257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042854495,0.00039332669,0.00084308564,0.0020375252,0.018992776,0.01725804,0.0051605217,0.008183497,0.00083444716],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009409756,0.000004320558,0.0002014621,0.0000135854625,0.0000036911035,0.00003330437,0.0002850915,0.0002607996,0.000048729933,0.9929254,0.000957205,0.0052569816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030066221,0.00008335185,0.002364649,0.00022933994,0.00005445561,0.00023474365,0.000736868,0.008233871,0.001032079,0.93192226,0.054991495,0.00008684249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008441012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008782964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012824419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064524906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050569023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067822814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481752133","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpw115","title":"Exhaustion of trade mark rights and parallel imports in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Doctrine; Legislature; International trade; Economics; Order (exchange); International economics; Business; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02345914670480189,"score_gpt":0.26846207933356037,"score_spread":0.24500293262875847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481752133","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27768582,0.0030272396,0.0019659102,0.015311576,0.00010498906,0.00012610816,0.00037158298,0.000038220664,0.7013685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471624,0.0021006998,0.0011802918,0.005360283,0.00002856016,0.0000400809,0.00012863886,0.000021005526,0.043977942],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529773,0.0002905435,0.00013406137,0.00038586557,0.0017876981,0.0021041704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743915,0.0009243516,0.00028207173,0.00014492015,0.0007847238,0.00042472067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001536523,0.00031418327,0.00035431827,0.001771458,0.018734237,0.007391691,0.0015305162,0.0036652929,0.0056596776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047305147,0.00039374726,0.00064623996,0.0036409462,0.010922276,0.0020798044,0.0040995944,0.0047235987,0.0002156601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003712563,0.00003445499,0.0065939934,0.000075837685,0.000017213562,0.002391165,0.008988285,0.0013205934,0.00050902995,0.9638625,0.008620307,0.0075494926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015813946,0.00012383376,0.07884688,0.0013892134,0.00026889375,0.0030108758,0.04465725,0.013262534,0.0037632987,0.22233436,0.63159204,0.0005926423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98862374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99230194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09559571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09559571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12035118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6935986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2488364111","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpw091","title":"General Court dismisses Fútbol Club Barcelona’s application for registration of the outline of its crest","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Doping in Sports","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Character (mathematics); Crest; Meaning (existential); Register (sociolinguistics); Function (biology); Law; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics; Mathematics; Anatomy; Geometry; Epistemology; Optics; Biology; Physics","score_opus":0.04732034850889414,"score_gpt":0.3437167768172868,"score_spread":0.29639642830839263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2488364111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08744436,0.0027539488,0.0047340314,0.12353786,0.0048955004,0.00032371972,0.0010654767,0.00077808887,0.77446705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32625788,0.0005256552,0.0029488234,0.18512566,0.0006381439,0.00025814687,0.00062237884,0.00023146672,0.48339194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99206984,0.0009180882,0.00040216526,0.0012476499,0.0035907603,0.0017715372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944813,0.0023002345,0.0001841119,0.0004895554,0.0021845726,0.00036021086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063426592,0.00052961754,0.0011165933,0.001155729,0.007663248,0.0076933056,0.003308073,0.0323202,0.012533171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013417812,0.00096553564,0.001293607,0.0010849078,0.003791164,0.0013804539,0.0038752232,0.010693743,0.004909045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004919948,0.00013649244,0.0048522614,0.00019702822,0.000060614726,0.0038430076,0.0040362617,0.0006025776,0.0031154645,0.4206021,0.53527683,0.02678542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014493155,0.00018350757,0.008839267,0.0003508103,0.00007742283,0.0006393673,0.002410908,0.0010224035,0.0014063756,0.011334678,0.97343665,0.00015358797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12245457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25486103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12245457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009330331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009261303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24348366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2554574731","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv192","title":"Keyword advertising does not amount to passing off in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Advertising; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.036501715392244345,"score_gpt":0.27498646691166323,"score_spread":0.2384847515194189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2554574731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15622361,0.0032987276,0.0017638538,0.120750494,0.0020074623,0.00023925888,0.0036420834,0.0004788293,0.7115956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6675583,0.0027393296,0.0016054389,0.09305428,0.00035612012,0.00008910768,0.0010083683,0.0001738465,0.23341522],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98666734,0.0004048276,0.00031552996,0.0010448898,0.0074385554,0.0041289222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98484266,0.002779006,0.00052032224,0.00051170215,0.009051914,0.0022943402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027428898,0.00049016165,0.0008350206,0.001473435,0.016197743,0.0078953635,0.0024436426,0.008042236,0.018617095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022990573,0.0008138112,0.00093317946,0.0021747437,0.0028701266,0.0022432115,0.0016631183,0.008787055,0.0018179795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090734975,0.00026494614,0.026683578,0.00031470845,0.00028020996,0.0024508866,0.0035271316,0.001147862,0.004097853,0.2922821,0.59279716,0.0752463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081719796,0.00052464526,0.06719784,0.0006241187,0.0012030542,0.00085781515,0.008319385,0.0043742964,0.008760105,0.024904974,0.8816995,0.00071708177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99038106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060095508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060095508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13925236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43602544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2562068109","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpw174","title":"Canadian copyright law and the <i>Charter of Rights and Freedoms</i> : Statutory property rights trump constitutionally guaranteed expression","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Statutory law; Law; Political science; Democracy; Freedom of expression; Realm; Law and economics; Property rights; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.012308475625481706,"score_gpt":0.20849054384247317,"score_spread":0.19618206821699147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2562068109","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065131066,0.010409939,0.005202285,0.17751397,0.003381368,0.00010636334,0.00068554014,0.0002172077,0.7959702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4151232,0.014032459,0.015987363,0.088376254,0.0022763493,0.00019749462,0.0007657943,0.00031433036,0.46292672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98635536,0.00092368736,0.00038366095,0.001366398,0.008876544,0.0020943633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908343,0.002153943,0.0004341866,0.00083717675,0.0046664416,0.001073989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052236384,0.0005869575,0.00043102464,0.0022578805,0.022066124,0.018206876,0.002374835,0.010164566,0.013711205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017709928,0.00057643285,0.0005637054,0.0036674333,0.03130859,0.005768776,0.003871492,0.009150727,0.0012841736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063967505,0.0000041710837,0.00017073471,0.000031348955,0.0000020121129,0.000055334167,0.0011898172,0.00008603768,0.00008560733,0.9214473,0.06910363,0.00781761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001547616,0.0000097862585,0.0019500601,0.00020761687,0.00001228391,0.00008671927,0.0009546319,0.00039277057,0.00026529492,0.11331549,0.8827177,0.000072093695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97389674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97755253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097207755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.097207755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17045891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70529497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2611335951","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpx071","title":"Federal Court interprets Canada’s technological protection measures for the first time","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Education, Law, and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federal court; Political science; Law; Business; Supreme court","score_opus":0.05993447584090487,"score_gpt":0.3286875154667891,"score_spread":0.2687530396258842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2611335951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038408384,0.0016823035,0.008948362,0.16567864,0.003170495,0.00031689697,0.0033189182,0.000554388,0.7779217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39063853,0.0014917173,0.009089134,0.20487453,0.0008556805,0.00030159793,0.0013460987,0.00019927468,0.39120346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9787364,0.0009364937,0.0006055567,0.0013870462,0.011857446,0.0064771418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838913,0.003319061,0.0003856138,0.00072773796,0.010700387,0.00097592303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059087775,0.00066435646,0.0008202634,0.002849743,0.026170002,0.009419839,0.0036708764,0.016077073,0.009960192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020394903,0.0010449229,0.001892578,0.002778378,0.00535845,0.0018655199,0.0027642907,0.013208581,0.001794986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053253643,0.000058706748,0.0040955828,0.000073396106,0.000038621703,0.00062376866,0.0040018857,0.00039890065,0.0017601422,0.5847443,0.38869646,0.015455116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059196464,0.000058206333,0.012080813,0.00030906414,0.00015172848,0.0002136446,0.0024396046,0.0011940517,0.002780807,0.023391237,0.95711404,0.00020760196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97640806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98968774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05951507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05951507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17866965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43181413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616537111","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpx052","title":"eXtreme action against G-Force leaves them blushing in the locker room","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Advanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Sign (mathematics); Intellectual property; Legal action; Business; Law; Political science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.10118829734194734,"score_gpt":0.298196843637976,"score_spread":0.19700854629602865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616537111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11999661,0.0014120599,0.006599749,0.14736925,0.0024027105,0.00011110349,0.00025914577,0.0004615259,0.72138786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45906237,0.00042178665,0.0020663794,0.10597757,0.00042542003,0.00008980223,0.00010622845,0.00017856495,0.43167186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583566,0.0004235638,0.00014480783,0.00059172214,0.0014825091,0.0015217266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997141,0.001527722,0.00012559646,0.00030825933,0.00060649286,0.00029095946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002674176,0.00051234115,0.00045581226,0.00060744194,0.008369563,0.0066460315,0.0013339124,0.017770374,0.026229054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011727506,0.00043877464,0.0007730916,0.0003609689,0.004547512,0.0035649578,0.0039039743,0.009423114,0.006850104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004444349,0.0000823037,0.0041231853,0.000108248816,0.000040864154,0.0046707266,0.010046145,0.0003418914,0.006290159,0.5967394,0.3297325,0.047380265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058333986,0.0002472313,0.0027332052,0.00028401217,0.00005138911,0.0016159464,0.004702307,0.00064955547,0.005829214,0.034239233,0.94947654,0.000113036265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019584835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03539023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026229054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002168898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004279897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08774495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753771498","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpx140","title":"Trade mark-related developments in the United States Patent and Trademark Office: 2016–17","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Appeal; Business; Quarter (Canadian coin); Service (business); Marketing; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.08318936303791587,"score_gpt":0.32276671291121267,"score_spread":0.23957734987329682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753771498","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20740041,0.06036765,0.002658781,0.082450785,0.013714427,0.000897788,0.043848835,0.0012775024,0.5873839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5896968,0.06704181,0.0059258426,0.022942506,0.007912774,0.00066920975,0.056724943,0.0005819337,0.24850403],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99357754,0.00021151024,0.0006174801,0.00044780003,0.0042643384,0.0008813725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860388,0.0019547516,0.0034935058,0.000566556,0.005753235,0.002193044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006119497,0.00029627667,0.0003077818,0.0059523894,0.0019642594,0.0063027875,0.0010347861,0.002589921,0.010420698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01967188,0.00033999796,0.0005870546,0.0068060937,0.0013209098,0.00390746,0.0025991288,0.0028241298,0.0035440053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029100335,0.000471588,0.075775504,0.0008028954,0.000047564692,0.001585824,0.0019432044,0.00044795428,0.0020653822,0.05095956,0.3810708,0.48453873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012897368,0.00008814525,0.089554496,0.00056490244,0.000016577298,0.00060711737,0.00069972133,0.00020070214,0.0011044788,0.0013576412,0.90576994,0.000023464043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05713174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08128248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05713174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068994197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018539023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11359841},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761143615","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpx168","title":"Federal Court of Canada: York University’s fair dealing guidelines not fair","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copyright Act; Fair use; Fair dealing; Agency (philosophy); Law; Copyright infringement; Interim; Political science; Copyright law; Common law copyright; Public administration; Intellectual property; Sociology; Good faith","score_opus":0.07551590696023368,"score_gpt":0.26623143024456697,"score_spread":0.19071552328433328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761143615","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008914688,0.0078923665,0.0032596649,0.16429844,0.006382524,0.0012885531,0.01005122,0.0007767469,0.79713583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08455184,0.0034539907,0.007049912,0.18288386,0.001336909,0.0019078406,0.003562236,0.00045853283,0.7147949],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743231,0.0017192344,0.0015475036,0.0024207882,0.01337219,0.0066171424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96777165,0.0094339065,0.0006562983,0.0019697035,0.018129922,0.002038576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012450585,0.0011316425,0.0014822016,0.0026873206,0.030066265,0.018189674,0.0048581846,0.034649096,0.041070517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044906195,0.0023800137,0.0018785783,0.0044218805,0.008468094,0.0047877952,0.00323686,0.019539408,0.010881841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005597361,0.00006439238,0.0007170768,0.00006651001,0.000012881374,0.00018942927,0.0012680216,0.00021076128,0.00029057666,0.20501527,0.78550756,0.006601549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093593524,0.000017804827,0.0032999525,0.0003748716,0.000034395263,0.00005507229,0.0008724608,0.0004215295,0.00035014877,0.010434693,0.9838845,0.00016096148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9720097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98126906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90770084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092299156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26335624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66968036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948179954","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpz067","title":"Court of Justice declares that Don Quixote may not be used on a label for cheese if it does not originate from the La Mancha Region","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Agricultural safety and regulations","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; European union; European court of justice; Law; Political science; Business; European Union law; International trade","score_opus":0.07646994500697588,"score_gpt":0.28719679191137576,"score_spread":0.21072684690439988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948179954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035350166,0.0040114215,0.0042522065,0.3431106,0.008581051,0.00034211014,0.002992974,0.0005819173,0.6007775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16334984,0.0012112915,0.0019353171,0.46139923,0.0018017458,0.00045185653,0.0005893036,0.00020762101,0.3690538],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909333,0.00097401615,0.0007551426,0.0017066939,0.0030188742,0.0026119675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917979,0.0040560234,0.00035559142,0.0005150904,0.0029010074,0.0003743025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006889338,0.0006477204,0.0015256759,0.00088816707,0.010832791,0.008510804,0.002965113,0.033479918,0.011399339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017780773,0.0011749833,0.0019127933,0.0015825733,0.0035960774,0.0028077425,0.0026162486,0.018858125,0.0046885023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040159165,0.00020380771,0.0040968074,0.0001602099,0.0001052921,0.002630665,0.0031402505,0.00047681024,0.0026310491,0.36403722,0.6083296,0.013786681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016111882,0.00012079838,0.0043825675,0.00041781,0.00016921377,0.0004616979,0.0021638644,0.00080652465,0.0016303918,0.017810646,0.9717234,0.00015206911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13219702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2047351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13219702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071500763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018747214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2628551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999858947","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa006","title":"Key issues around copyright and social media: ownership, infringement and liability","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Revenue; Social media; Business; Key (lock); Revenue sharing; Advertising; Internet privacy; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Computer security; Law; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.05642769317203552,"score_gpt":0.2571169561906089,"score_spread":0.2006892630185734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999858947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015041872,0.0182243,0.028812656,0.37655059,0.0037146045,0.0002270598,0.00017739327,0.000114430855,0.55713713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8022501,0.018530441,0.010582113,0.07053969,0.012731348,0.0005115951,0.00009318917,0.00016880078,0.0845927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9574012,0.018172802,0.002625414,0.0049462626,0.013503142,0.0033511235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8924896,0.07813569,0.008015582,0.008905154,0.010270806,0.0021832904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033363357,0.0008011196,0.0009628646,0.003050315,0.011168485,0.03385949,0.00373063,0.032883026,0.012344445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08896939,0.0007912197,0.000874549,0.0033024428,0.070972964,0.037429065,0.009278186,0.016388223,0.0029230355],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050914364,0.000009065524,0.00019403751,0.00005050868,0.0000033841643,0.00013877846,0.002018998,0.0000638327,0.00005730609,0.981779,0.008611669,0.0070682983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011823544,0.000035069006,0.0005384812,0.00095838826,0.000016517311,0.0007127087,0.0034987666,0.00049729605,0.00048595326,0.8389209,0.15427563,0.00004845189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061685126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038024888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03385949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00823044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01324089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17644441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3001659700","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa002","title":"All that glitters: Federal Court of Canada issues Canada's first website blocking order against GoldTV","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Freedom of Expression and Defamation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blocking (statistics); Order (exchange); Federal court; Law; Political science; Business; Supreme court; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04600213450797524,"score_gpt":0.28639320499091886,"score_spread":0.24039107048294361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3001659700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04303771,0.0022215582,0.002300939,0.28062996,0.0038489369,0.00025594534,0.0018037559,0.00049961015,0.6654016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33497423,0.0014040655,0.0018161131,0.18524571,0.000693409,0.00009565225,0.0005796893,0.00023080272,0.47496033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907754,0.00031983468,0.00022597742,0.0005595086,0.0053138924,0.0028054728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99092275,0.0017034668,0.0001846292,0.00032834805,0.005737498,0.0011232581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030201394,0.00039873805,0.00046407434,0.0016304952,0.02281149,0.009726386,0.0022100557,0.014802427,0.017377049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015281148,0.00059197965,0.0009009633,0.0013749289,0.0045733326,0.002075895,0.0020595198,0.011949276,0.0025111923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007060284,0.000053196472,0.0040488355,0.00005979484,0.000027400127,0.001101121,0.0031812435,0.0002744914,0.0011902397,0.18673044,0.7875844,0.01567827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004797765,0.000035999008,0.006114826,0.00022977719,0.000073814255,0.0002456082,0.00368052,0.00087884365,0.0019534691,0.009587815,0.9770031,0.000148357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97451615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98674285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05961829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05961829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12163375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.432563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012135415","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa011","title":"Is IP out of control?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nothing; Opposition (politics); Legislation; Law; Commonwealth; Copyright Act; Parliament; Intellectual property; Political science; Law and economics; Copyright law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0639044606991642,"score_gpt":0.2636796906152728,"score_spread":0.1997752299161086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012135415","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039193435,0.048438605,0.003767809,0.74284714,0.008297583,0.000024268684,0.00021281149,0.00023247345,0.19226004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3751722,0.08075857,0.0015734371,0.39453715,0.043869678,0.00016643669,0.0005491623,0.0005278543,0.10284546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918716,0.0019257704,0.00028535933,0.0017960223,0.0025596342,0.001561652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867258,0.0059258356,0.0011989425,0.0018438153,0.0022516414,0.0020539167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008895332,0.00041955672,0.0008288311,0.0015160858,0.004131064,0.0213028,0.0022038165,0.00780604,0.034648493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026532952,0.00033116053,0.0005436137,0.001987098,0.022780456,0.027614493,0.0053333384,0.012748279,0.007333625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040744533,0.000030980937,0.0013753662,0.00016479754,0.000016236574,0.00025567148,0.0020162573,0.000051392475,0.00007984547,0.66714036,0.2313126,0.0975157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013049823,0.00003386313,0.0011052282,0.0006023348,0.000013197356,0.0004601217,0.002071403,0.00010557164,0.00014685057,0.28851914,0.7069068,0.00002237879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037943672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014714361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034648493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004594252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005281026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11591083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080762255","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa116","title":"Canadian implied renunciation theory with an implied licence-basis for recognizing the purchasers’ rights to patented products","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patent infringement; Product (mathematics); Patent Act; Jurisdiction; Renunciation; Law and economics; Business; Jurisprudence; Statutory law; Law; Economics; Intellectual property; Patent law; Political science","score_opus":0.12468319796708109,"score_gpt":0.24590539432856004,"score_spread":0.12122219636147895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080762255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005403468,0.0049820514,0.031387426,0.025858661,0.00060065306,0.00011730269,0.00024686038,0.0000974396,0.9313062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69893336,0.0093831755,0.033026308,0.022977743,0.0011527742,0.00037397625,0.00033747425,0.0002735422,0.23354153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98575866,0.0021852087,0.0005254601,0.0019578813,0.007601701,0.0019710339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99425185,0.0019503826,0.00027440808,0.00059249427,0.0026074422,0.00032346376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006700752,0.001074666,0.0008782512,0.0038612136,0.011818672,0.010300471,0.0042653293,0.011934258,0.012652237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011631848,0.0007925886,0.0012296465,0.003978657,0.036694676,0.010070839,0.0043010456,0.009797874,0.0021073932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024282506,0.0000015069445,0.000022246246,0.000010873433,7.632382e-7,0.00002692204,0.0005345649,0.000044462606,0.000017040335,0.9966066,0.0016261033,0.0011064216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002400601,0.000014121749,0.00042793993,0.00021529924,0.00002690449,0.00017585825,0.000475999,0.0011712133,0.00023489093,0.77673197,0.2204348,0.00006697852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6318409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5313024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36815912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05889198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059145793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7406546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121940187","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpq002","title":"Harnessing the development potential of geographical indications for traditional knowledge-based agricultural products","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Traditional knowledge; Indigenous; Agriculture; Business; Geographical indication; Geographical distance; Regional science; Political science; Economic growth; Geography; Sociology; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.11125772001176205,"score_gpt":0.2540631882008878,"score_spread":0.14280546818912576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121940187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20740211,0.0058724154,0.08680749,0.012392627,0.00020396418,0.00030317975,0.00010081074,0.000273998,0.6866434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635268,0.0016675077,0.019733185,0.00097507547,0.00007137781,0.00012255319,0.000049416794,0.000041165353,0.013813003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952585,0.002007922,0.00025066125,0.0005159832,0.0015734019,0.00039337898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99079764,0.0036408964,0.00166766,0.0022610012,0.001216742,0.0004160515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007373999,0.00031622942,0.00025559327,0.0017905154,0.0016539146,0.0061555584,0.0015969983,0.0021101888,0.0040078065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0114943255,0.0002960841,0.00042905178,0.0011255704,0.011829163,0.006352638,0.008092918,0.0022762907,0.00062123645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038294336,0.00004097067,0.003277508,0.00027708412,0.000013787538,0.00039632217,0.007738254,0.0011528557,0.0053473525,0.9058744,0.0010597305,0.074783504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064997774,0.0006298181,0.01774605,0.0018026421,0.00009943649,0.0015406542,0.010748135,0.0025647285,0.010870784,0.40886608,0.54492533,0.00014127008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017436808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032220033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007373999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027284808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005572086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03899795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124237478","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpq089","title":"Does listening to music excerpts online amount to fair dealing?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Cover (algebra); Active listening; Advertising; Internet privacy; Political science; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Law; Communication; Engineering","score_opus":0.027309509459939315,"score_gpt":0.2675682455213143,"score_spread":0.240258736061375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124237478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14520842,0.0019800125,0.008981713,0.09363281,0.0027928273,0.00018022169,0.00028914324,0.0004532164,0.7464816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84672153,0.0010441269,0.00404403,0.04168262,0.0024280823,0.00014222671,0.00018492155,0.0002938648,0.103458725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898845,0.0026054212,0.00042606585,0.0009902181,0.003971717,0.002122039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97066474,0.017347192,0.0022911846,0.0027858212,0.0045644366,0.0023466416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013897412,0.00030587337,0.0005381859,0.0011911233,0.009394955,0.013367582,0.0018217614,0.0072660064,0.042640895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07332232,0.0003093303,0.00069576834,0.0012373062,0.00930449,0.0104086585,0.0037716113,0.0037132262,0.0063747265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065258396,0.0007021775,0.029848967,0.00026734002,0.00009381436,0.0011732271,0.06361975,0.00030127616,0.0035745422,0.4050393,0.17530471,0.3194223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018160012,0.00038658147,0.09534861,0.0008381555,0.00014674987,0.0008902769,0.07173462,0.0014883804,0.004278949,0.18679948,0.63766253,0.00024408317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051571693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12603597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051571693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038786689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005671021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14264798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131653929","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpab010","title":"Protecting Ghana’s intellectual property rights in <i>kente</i> textiles: the case for Geographical Indications","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misappropriation; Intellectual property; Cultural heritage; Folklore; European union; Intangible cultural heritage; Ethnic group; Handicraft; Multinational corporation; Geography; Agriculture; Political science; Economy; Business; Law; International trade; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03741707969029026,"score_gpt":0.28939870234318216,"score_spread":0.2519816226528919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131653929","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11737677,0.012941158,0.013287186,0.20523512,0.0005698116,0.00013055412,0.000096900396,0.00010083401,0.6502615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94370085,0.0027859847,0.002861022,0.02144352,0.0002981678,0.000089170215,0.000036909074,0.000072218434,0.028712202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913556,0.0038354765,0.00041034343,0.0010583214,0.0017737228,0.0015666147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544201,0.029598799,0.0050004097,0.0058622616,0.0035053971,0.0016130401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012800927,0.00030958522,0.00039094657,0.0013812904,0.005818161,0.012167905,0.00171476,0.010089663,0.010862431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03551854,0.00045001795,0.0003842602,0.0015473666,0.026605245,0.014873015,0.0068902904,0.008635442,0.0012979179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048096164,0.000023744611,0.0027005116,0.00012291463,0.000007857512,0.0016225724,0.01217404,0.00015373109,0.0007117727,0.94200605,0.009893235,0.030535571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074163334,0.00009425407,0.005690049,0.0021839568,0.000037841302,0.003417342,0.022687526,0.00056893297,0.0018784074,0.39513424,0.56816936,0.000063975545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012319233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0127803525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012800927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060521727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059906337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0676986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139155286","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa183","title":"The Australian tobacco plain packaging legislation: a case study on intellectual property enforcement and policy intervention to promote public health","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Intellectual property; Business; Legislation; Public health; Intervention (counseling); Tobacco control; State (computer science); Tobacco industry; Standardization; Sovereignty; Packaging and labeling; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine; Law; Marketing","score_opus":0.1339367764642654,"score_gpt":0.37012142231847023,"score_spread":0.23618464585420482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139155286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6199773,0.0072920513,0.0046278927,0.08984892,0.00042738704,0.0006748308,0.000080024605,0.000063035564,0.27700853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93230355,0.005055984,0.0030249225,0.017055836,0.00021225431,0.0002977879,0.000034222965,0.00003646933,0.04197893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98251903,0.009711833,0.00040379312,0.0008289165,0.0036299953,0.0029063735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868095,0.008846706,0.0011709032,0.00071817276,0.0010579141,0.0013967385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0152802095,0.00066012243,0.00069777167,0.00259498,0.027477827,0.0076340446,0.0032111285,0.0149300555,0.005082537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021018373,0.00074054697,0.00092751085,0.003825968,0.012162978,0.0045042047,0.009367158,0.01167321,0.0004305922],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009383898,0.0011766037,0.013547966,0.0007759851,0.000049432972,0.058980297,0.37121403,0.00089263055,0.0015756799,0.47940612,0.01990849,0.052378915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101691185,0.0008243737,0.05920677,0.0028238676,0.00015494048,0.021152586,0.321449,0.0056972746,0.0028553254,0.07148317,0.5140432,0.00020778639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11014965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14882441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11014965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017375689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02216845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21901703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160375458","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa196","title":"Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Rules it can interpret contracts: rejects Goldilocks approach to jurisdiction  <i>Salt Canada Inc v Baker</i>, 2020 FCA 127, 28 July 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisdiction; Goldilocks principle; Law; Federal court; Political science; Taste; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.019796597576460375,"score_gpt":0.262074863091499,"score_spread":0.24227826551503864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160375458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021982038,0.0016398547,0.0050790864,0.24653696,0.0016947984,0.00041431544,0.002116517,0.0003969887,0.7201393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5150067,0.0015839285,0.010001681,0.22908543,0.00091760576,0.00041633288,0.00093808013,0.000312667,0.2417375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97425985,0.0020882725,0.0011300871,0.0020800505,0.01151696,0.008924797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969875,0.010319436,0.0006049082,0.0015506725,0.015415996,0.0022339884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017692076,0.00063307775,0.00102942,0.003561947,0.025290448,0.016157754,0.0060743974,0.020988248,0.018681834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059035,0.0014790011,0.0012158684,0.0028773246,0.009340055,0.0038239677,0.003815641,0.014357422,0.002709366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005691193,0.00003405592,0.002936581,0.000049749367,0.00002486393,0.0005558538,0.0022660794,0.0006356352,0.0004858268,0.6020893,0.3800954,0.010769806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016767193,0.000037667676,0.0069376207,0.00061848137,0.00018646718,0.00023491119,0.00443377,0.0050253365,0.001293248,0.1042738,0.8763981,0.00039297662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.973963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98681784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08430457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08430457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24803206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6116754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206564096","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpab182","title":"The proposal for waiver of WTO’s TRIPS Agreement to prevent, contain and treat COVID-19: investigating the benefits and challenges for low- and middle-income countries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); TRIPS Agreement; TRIPS architecture; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Low income; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Business; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Law; Developing country; Virology; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.08002614433161263,"score_gpt":0.3232760170172692,"score_spread":0.24324987268565657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206564096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008820117,0.009350416,0.03205137,0.44796744,0.061346386,0.0072729345,0.0032281731,0.0012348474,0.42872825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055710264,0.0074909413,0.056171134,0.5431751,0.011259684,0.011313319,0.0035226552,0.0010205011,0.31033653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94997877,0.013451672,0.004808178,0.0041953633,0.020180674,0.007385259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724887,0.01079881,0.0024399783,0.0030650888,0.0076464904,0.003560898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06348925,0.0019942399,0.0014442482,0.0020844215,0.006449114,0.021694008,0.007725692,0.06842414,0.020053213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09601565,0.0020826003,0.00403402,0.0016676434,0.009945941,0.017063951,0.016642371,0.03638565,0.011745182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017068992,0.00019246737,0.00058228744,0.0007040654,0.00005634798,0.0018351936,0.0017079373,0.00066679984,0.0015834109,0.4291298,0.5299395,0.033431564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012325005,0.00015964959,0.00056574633,0.0012829851,0.000041901578,0.00035247082,0.00078676915,0.00042381007,0.0005967448,0.038118076,0.9574443,0.00010431923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018309284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008777084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06842414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071500563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074133076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3357672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236585934","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpm255","title":"In Person","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Schedule; The Internet; Competition (biology); Work (physics); Unfair competition; Business; Law; Intersection (aeronautics); Competition law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Management; Engineering; Monopoly; Computer science","score_opus":0.1264089556095902,"score_gpt":0.2717615841516081,"score_spread":0.14535262854201791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236585934","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023074385,0.0018290285,0.0011990765,0.02891464,0.00865737,0.00020541443,0.0016449031,0.0009558732,0.95428634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004540623,0.00061075186,0.00021581074,0.0071992166,0.0004464012,0.00005684958,0.0003146605,0.00012858008,0.9864871],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971879,0.00048496705,0.00012150659,0.0005649275,0.0008651576,0.0007755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98966306,0.00051438285,0.00035313424,0.0005874229,0.0038471213,0.0050349035],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014877144,0.00074318814,0.00087349495,0.0010200833,0.007294683,0.007350031,0.0012682297,0.0022239613,0.7385002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00912196,0.0003529993,0.00031247933,0.0011817463,0.0011522669,0.005212218,0.005591786,0.002582451,0.5716169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012583984,0.00003820988,0.0004464204,0.000029980236,0.000001141622,0.000105335675,0.0004927675,0.000008239953,0.0000785356,0.0014657195,0.95844144,0.038879614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029674027,0.000009360603,0.0003397339,0.000033842345,9.638018e-7,0.000142839,0.001029176,0.000012798223,0.000023469016,0.0002465362,0.9981542,0.000004151022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01890045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044394784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26149982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025800036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008579842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362668197","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad032","title":"Invoking Article 73 TRIPS in good faith: no recourse to ‘security exceptions’ for Russia’s violation of TRIPS","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Faith; Good faith; Political science; Business; Law; Engineering; Transport engineering; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.05062818481610564,"score_gpt":0.34595048058260947,"score_spread":0.2953222957665038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362668197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03207588,0.0005707874,0.005272744,0.040304307,0.0010868302,0.00006933641,0.0001304076,0.00017596189,0.92031384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82865465,0.00049760257,0.002267553,0.051559534,0.000701627,0.00017418734,0.00012396209,0.00015193412,0.11586893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99166495,0.0024138305,0.0006231581,0.0017680224,0.0018113977,0.0017186989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915036,0.004197089,0.0007107644,0.0016217214,0.0013340324,0.0006328708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067958254,0.0002890054,0.0004713192,0.00048281727,0.006922249,0.01019385,0.002331342,0.01699238,0.010610856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022511803,0.0004047455,0.00060890405,0.00051681366,0.0122906985,0.004901813,0.0064550005,0.012818914,0.002808474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031152907,0.000024426978,0.0011793307,0.00005115646,0.0000146390685,0.000520071,0.0073181284,0.00022727522,0.00039615243,0.94306487,0.039061856,0.00811097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034743094,0.000086083026,0.004001351,0.0007474321,0.000057280755,0.0007178849,0.010985242,0.0011473573,0.0011459134,0.19523811,0.78573346,0.00010524547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019215913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022935044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019215913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033795247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008671016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038208127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366605994","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad038","title":"International investment law and data, copyrights and performance requirements: a closer look at <i>Einarsson v Canada</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Law; Copyright law; Political science; Investment (military); International law; Volume (thermodynamics); Business; Physics","score_opus":0.045183140152419844,"score_gpt":0.26914031757511186,"score_spread":0.22395717742269203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366605994","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073577785,0.02615462,0.00040292332,0.56063396,0.004876409,0.00006927381,0.0008991236,0.000084110805,0.39952183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2157791,0.051853128,0.0028145362,0.37140405,0.0043560388,0.000095567586,0.0012830263,0.0005380034,0.35187653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98335475,0.0007439432,0.000522242,0.000927332,0.010027868,0.0044238805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96930087,0.0073917727,0.0012985361,0.0008101595,0.016581792,0.0046167644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005967342,0.0006056314,0.0010798029,0.0059809564,0.021413507,0.02398618,0.0026898794,0.014970467,0.021926483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024815243,0.0007796353,0.0008130082,0.010908794,0.012439058,0.0067332825,0.003174052,0.01582647,0.002045879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021549928,0.000022635273,0.0016256401,0.00018126024,0.000016449227,0.000670956,0.004419104,0.00015536691,0.0002298729,0.19555873,0.78163874,0.015459777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000126429895,0.0000063180737,0.004321882,0.0005333817,0.000017567821,0.00019023546,0.006904688,0.0001382532,0.00016445319,0.011180865,0.97645074,0.00007896761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98766476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99377257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14605053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14605053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.312874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99046034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367395440","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad034","title":"Achieving a (copy)right to repair for the EU’s green economy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; International trade; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.13241053900580999,"score_gpt":0.2780996817719409,"score_spread":0.1456891427661309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367395440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069803074,0.005298408,0.05122782,0.09826307,0.0017328638,0.0001827054,0.00033005065,0.00038577334,0.77277625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74249995,0.0027212445,0.033018205,0.043491926,0.0005616671,0.00025714087,0.00034089258,0.00035302556,0.17675589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916871,0.0022636913,0.00055118336,0.0014688766,0.0025719912,0.00145721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904143,0.003095025,0.00091908046,0.0030361766,0.0016795783,0.0008558712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010731492,0.00035689358,0.00053661386,0.00089713885,0.0035190065,0.011482467,0.0013112344,0.012227917,0.012840734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021445254,0.00030002225,0.0010360626,0.00070250477,0.0073361634,0.0077288616,0.007505592,0.0048459913,0.0029493705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022066697,0.000041685733,0.0009188664,0.00007500213,0.00001136864,0.00023282741,0.0020630711,0.0006498635,0.00081524404,0.9405932,0.018015409,0.03656147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001988068,0.00006934051,0.0021996591,0.00043128678,0.000022954759,0.00044547513,0.0020038546,0.0007137639,0.0013939312,0.23359111,0.75905514,0.000053765136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005573637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004764486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012840734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002467416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006939203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05675423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379233554","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad047","title":"Implementing copyright revocation in Ireland and Malta: lessons for lawmakers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Auckland; National Library of Australia","keywords":"Revocation; Political science; Business; Computer science; Programming language; Overhead (engineering)","score_opus":0.05621843693672584,"score_gpt":0.3090988206149397,"score_spread":0.25288038367821386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379233554","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14108938,0.011915561,0.0047957813,0.49732125,0.0011566118,0.0005914549,0.00009442916,0.00025502598,0.3427806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85701275,0.0076792086,0.005492761,0.06927699,0.00033142176,0.00028292462,0.00007421184,0.00020899529,0.059640747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9743692,0.007269323,0.0019495394,0.0021387213,0.005763187,0.008509941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581048,0.019930527,0.0033741659,0.0031274247,0.011473569,0.003989524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028708268,0.0005095913,0.0007267018,0.0024296492,0.011512456,0.035892177,0.0055550486,0.012624295,0.0068773977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06347631,0.00072112767,0.0008530299,0.0025842574,0.025319705,0.01998704,0.014349441,0.013634052,0.000930219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081242,0.00029775116,0.005214517,0.00042443298,0.000033893844,0.0028199186,0.05147447,0.00082086306,0.001011962,0.8172194,0.03692625,0.08367537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093007424,0.00015453571,0.007686451,0.0023260475,0.0000694702,0.0006127068,0.15614748,0.0012512826,0.0023193457,0.06872545,0.7603248,0.00028935127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3420591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3222975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3420591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057845462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.077365816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6801362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380089811","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad052","title":"Patenting human biological materials and data: balancing the reward of innovation with the <i>ordre public</i> and morality exception","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Morality; Psychology; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2805292259632416,"score_gpt":0.30365796945734225,"score_spread":0.023128743494100656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380089811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05857022,0.0083493125,0.0926781,0.26634997,0.0013121401,0.00022157776,0.000099161975,0.00015844073,0.5722611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93805504,0.0031037373,0.014241629,0.01778494,0.0013255157,0.0002028327,0.000044075656,0.0000784885,0.025163742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9596173,0.019368492,0.0020726288,0.00441547,0.011416969,0.0031091194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.925358,0.046436004,0.006893377,0.0121876,0.006438733,0.0026863143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041216455,0.0004719585,0.0009043869,0.0019109679,0.0059778304,0.027304377,0.002554013,0.012865425,0.0048173703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05271821,0.00046942846,0.00089941645,0.0017433977,0.057062957,0.020021776,0.010502601,0.009412336,0.0013457452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010861743,0.000015903013,0.00031707482,0.000041212636,0.0000063181974,0.00006577626,0.00079405506,0.00013849491,0.00019267117,0.98962665,0.001653112,0.0071378355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021289785,0.00006552802,0.00090718933,0.00038999086,0.00002051938,0.00026094305,0.0013151333,0.0008843195,0.0011108986,0.91547775,0.079509385,0.00003701888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024576003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018410884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041216455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068958197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015510082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21797603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387843104","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad083","title":"Banking on IP?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Global Financial Regulation and Crises","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.0739375612232151,"score_gpt":0.2766524172452645,"score_spread":0.20271485602204942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387843104","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003366722,0.042987116,0.0003390383,0.8300391,0.024689002,0.000040812698,0.00034824974,0.00013386487,0.098056145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06322286,0.09902848,0.00057400507,0.6145062,0.025010461,0.00020023198,0.00090126187,0.00025938623,0.19629711],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685967,0.00092575623,0.00018483015,0.00045772607,0.00083873764,0.0007332755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926449,0.0021096044,0.00077593944,0.0002709164,0.0014299885,0.002768718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002499885,0.00045248965,0.00053603493,0.0011339362,0.0040382734,0.0123879425,0.0011953613,0.007945294,0.12413761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024587613,0.00027671823,0.00042158493,0.0014559978,0.0034870065,0.013004336,0.004256844,0.008616615,0.03227097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015673313,0.000028200746,0.0008500848,0.00017429065,0.0000030010306,0.00038167127,0.0014004941,0.000006693398,0.000019011719,0.011157836,0.91308415,0.07287899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000810808,0.000018057775,0.0015485192,0.001414802,0.000004870161,0.001586309,0.0053875283,0.000024961737,0.000041923093,0.009686945,0.9802619,0.000016130209],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039920053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056909206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12413761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031030923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052895523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41528165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390263545","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad113","title":"The stunted development of unfair competition law in the United States and Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unfair competition; Statute; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Competition (biology); Competition law; Common law; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Choice of law; Economics; Business; International trade; Market economy; Monopoly","score_opus":0.04188437057267157,"score_gpt":0.3016783232196145,"score_spread":0.25979395264694294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390263545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3001442,0.012497532,0.00439078,0.16431847,0.0005757391,0.0001130535,0.0006614423,0.00012385336,0.5171749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9655942,0.0025083094,0.0012396149,0.009864441,0.000046347468,0.00001754728,0.000106699816,0.00002772696,0.02059514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916419,0.00067954866,0.00016139956,0.00071509206,0.0042161094,0.0025860157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9886619,0.002109168,0.0006189088,0.00039549108,0.0056303698,0.0025842437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004014581,0.00016358102,0.00031249842,0.0030957225,0.017829254,0.009833746,0.0015382115,0.002801172,0.004535815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009321811,0.00032784799,0.0004000358,0.003126263,0.01434418,0.00224741,0.0039660865,0.0057095145,0.00017321813],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033058717,0.000040640196,0.010739721,0.00004770763,0.000028523791,0.0006159623,0.008575604,0.0009792486,0.0004365751,0.9058881,0.030118799,0.04249605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042577652,0.00006669077,0.0996432,0.00087625685,0.00008289849,0.0006394245,0.030270383,0.005253373,0.0019008821,0.11959482,0.74126005,0.0003694104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99125236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14964917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14964917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19504564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9862864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391045512","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpae001","title":"Protection against unfair competition—African Regional Intellectual Property Organization member states and South Africa","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"EU Law and Policy Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Unfair competition; Competition (biology); International trade; Scope (computer science); Obligation; Convention; Customs union; TRIPS Agreement; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05232109075918227,"score_gpt":0.29699725789158976,"score_spread":0.24467616713240747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391045512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95417917,0.0042787916,0.00033716913,0.004104385,0.000018998377,0.000030893927,0.00006867786,0.0000036453303,0.03697828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986265,0.00071415375,0.00012076304,0.00011571283,0.0000053892168,0.000008678942,0.00001796863,9.379606e-7,0.00038996435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818015,0.000762875,0.000113925074,0.00012763824,0.00031867423,0.0004968667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99408144,0.002663531,0.0023753925,0.00019758263,0.00036943474,0.0003126332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004065992,0.00011218135,0.00015562685,0.0015975259,0.0015413403,0.0032860534,0.0005410505,0.00072394905,0.0021294805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007963709,0.00014721726,0.00013469395,0.0034256296,0.0030964513,0.0022565168,0.0021000819,0.000784362,0.00008288923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004904476,0.00018111484,0.3488563,0.0014760272,0.00015472852,0.004109561,0.18593492,0.0012257516,0.00599258,0.2944023,0.003506494,0.15366969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036753125,0.00021985939,0.7889513,0.0020003493,0.000106487125,0.0012187341,0.113321856,0.0007201285,0.0023879686,0.010380521,0.080590695,0.00006537148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0135742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017065613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0135742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020374332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002999287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026990414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391357458","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpad121","title":"Protection against unfair competition around the globe","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Merger and Competition Analysis","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Unfair competition; Competition (biology); Business; Advertising; Law; Political science; Biology; Medicine; Ophthalmology","score_opus":0.0474353132957666,"score_gpt":0.2505299014048285,"score_spread":0.2030945881090619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391357458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005398954,0.0024167502,0.011532183,0.033841774,0.0021585056,0.0002641003,0.00028730958,0.0003753452,0.94372505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30713272,0.0054597496,0.020627066,0.12572487,0.00525068,0.0019755184,0.0019709277,0.000845217,0.53101325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.975863,0.0061280937,0.0013722181,0.0033827478,0.010647461,0.0026063593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740945,0.0062879184,0.0022541545,0.009558409,0.0059662913,0.0018387017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016404195,0.0012306179,0.0013978686,0.0019498328,0.006074176,0.015137515,0.00438463,0.019718371,0.05650737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04033824,0.0007230293,0.001228443,0.0017248465,0.014516998,0.0068532377,0.015286416,0.013467616,0.02342841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036375073,0.000073404866,0.0003410025,0.00012303346,0.000018910161,0.0003688094,0.0024791148,0.00036801747,0.0010437075,0.8893366,0.062226042,0.04358494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030261628,0.000065665714,0.00081407075,0.0007370532,0.000017744416,0.00039590275,0.00064838544,0.00026314927,0.0007603903,0.15987986,0.836343,0.00004462486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005276008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047617466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05650737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004622251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016901303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18903601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410286560","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaf031","title":"The compliance of the fair use clause in the South African copyright amendment bill with the three-step test and the constitution of South Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Copyright and Intellectual Property","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Amendment; Compliance (psychology); Law; Test (biology); Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04425567413726051,"score_gpt":0.23870074157778678,"score_spread":0.19444506744052628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410286560","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16980766,0.0021255743,0.033768974,0.022704415,0.0010096332,0.00091649394,0.0003648869,0.00008044901,0.7692219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515569,0.0007456709,0.01332096,0.0053409804,0.00021130888,0.00073964545,0.00007834805,0.000038067654,0.02796801],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869883,0.004464489,0.0012648198,0.0012044199,0.0040721823,0.002005758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827608,0.010724205,0.0012614029,0.0024019063,0.0025054838,0.00034625683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011813047,0.00031384855,0.0005221233,0.0016680808,0.004402618,0.0071088434,0.0011679139,0.0047962093,0.0055516437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026766729,0.00053245027,0.000866985,0.001174057,0.016532106,0.0036714307,0.0034759603,0.005988303,0.00083440624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009912039,0.000009156076,0.00027111731,0.00002948287,0.000003559636,0.0001429143,0.0012716798,0.00015273201,0.00037755276,0.99463814,0.0009857735,0.0021081131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012104134,0.00012737708,0.0071827974,0.001409722,0.00011123714,0.0006314243,0.0037291858,0.0027153946,0.0051416378,0.67368895,0.30493936,0.00020188809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014160832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012744509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014160832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00593342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015799435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062474072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412942271","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaf048","title":"<i>Say goodbye to my little FRAND</i> : is the withdrawal of the European Commission’s Regulation on standard essential patents a missed opportunity or a dodged bullet?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; European commission; Law and economics; Business; Law; Political science; Economics; International trade; European union","score_opus":0.07552407127873174,"score_gpt":0.26497380147683675,"score_spread":0.18944973019810502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412942271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036089664,0.0013939072,0.0004981388,0.98629236,0.006277469,0.0000065289005,0.000021419102,0.000024896048,0.0051243445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021362793,0.0030132716,0.001468704,0.94469273,0.0076089418,0.000034914043,0.00003556435,0.00012294328,0.021660123],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901844,0.0037958436,0.00046927383,0.0014344197,0.0031339736,0.0009820481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9595225,0.020829001,0.0026049472,0.0019011094,0.011755876,0.003386467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016275575,0.00046351773,0.0009881444,0.0010580396,0.0065175975,0.01660712,0.0025681476,0.017739173,0.014405781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.065170646,0.00039511366,0.00086747546,0.0010830717,0.019136425,0.01813762,0.0039879973,0.033578973,0.008047959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002572877,0.000021295346,0.00040215912,0.00006825059,0.000008297981,0.00012624315,0.0010907867,0.0000578083,0.00020902595,0.06188821,0.9282286,0.007873551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013455894,0.000037932652,0.0005393161,0.000678013,0.000011699294,0.00027485556,0.0042704344,0.0003163381,0.0006445289,0.055872265,0.9372366,0.000104524566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008768443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007791668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017739173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048966175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007130919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08607447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413953126","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaf054","title":"Understanding technology regulation through history: insights from the legal history of the printing press and copyright in early modern England","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Printing press; Legal history; History; Copyright law; History of technology; Law; Political science; Intellectual property; Archaeology","score_opus":0.07216951159195743,"score_gpt":0.2750861957258497,"score_spread":0.20291668413389224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413953126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6193698,0.0211821,0.0031404223,0.028920671,0.00018092101,0.000035080564,0.00015396034,0.00002347027,0.3269936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906873,0.0022508164,0.00017015715,0.00045904354,0.000076454635,0.000011024159,0.00001790094,0.000012470655,0.006314917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99636334,0.0018965296,0.00019789816,0.00039451165,0.0007403364,0.00040737283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699163,0.02413792,0.0026554144,0.00097150647,0.0016336739,0.00068523095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053689308,0.00013655529,0.00032833812,0.0047887973,0.0054646544,0.011255492,0.0008747844,0.0023563874,0.0076296865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019458186,0.00042985764,0.00013554146,0.004399979,0.032662977,0.012770154,0.0043429863,0.0029598821,0.0003725853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004061411,0.000041913336,0.00819915,0.00017719378,0.000011040897,0.0012722159,0.36295727,0.00027270836,0.00031796543,0.60048515,0.0022247846,0.02399999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024446863,0.00008422091,0.07028805,0.0020989408,0.000028433165,0.0012449329,0.22711912,0.0006942284,0.001211621,0.16582076,0.53128314,0.000102062724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029525192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043989353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029525192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014351801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003958382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10413009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}