{"meta":{"query_hash":"54628ca741b4","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing"},"cohort_total":30,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":30,"exported":30,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/54628ca741b4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Interactive+Marketing"},"results":[{"id":"W1989998381","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2015.01.002","title":"The Impact of Market Competition on Search Advertising","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Competition (biology); Business; Search advertising; Advertising; Market competition; Industrial organization; Online advertising; Economics; Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web; Market economy","score_opus":0.029819471177352605,"score_gpt":0.31320007081333906,"score_spread":0.28338059963598644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1989998381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9355726,0.00086010585,0.0009045694,0.0005791348,0.000018082204,0.00007580009,0.00012667195,0.000019547551,0.061843462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99908614,0.000080831785,0.00011339496,0.00005042901,0.000023088127,0.000008496256,0.000035627276,0.0000036396214,0.0005983144],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638677,0.0014316905,0.00016923071,0.00034809695,0.0011225541,0.00054165185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9367828,0.04940869,0.0075479844,0.00088948396,0.0031461546,0.0022248807],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035323396,0.00028483983,0.0005285998,0.0018867062,0.0011577157,0.0040802825,0.00045927372,0.0009820916,0.010558386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022474384,0.0002342305,0.00051777635,0.001265903,0.0016669242,0.0024785013,0.0012311385,0.0009083123,0.0005926871],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029975593,0.002401272,0.8110983,0.0007372336,0.0003160628,0.0017050676,0.005579074,0.0070708673,0.012662989,0.062597476,0.0035378726,0.089296214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001969941,0.0014166973,0.9481756,0.00013553778,0.000336968,0.000868655,0.005444353,0.016809803,0.0037026417,0.013779594,0.009005304,0.00012775313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075155594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00781482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010558386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021993762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015513011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035321355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2008132350","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002","title":"How Does Brand-related User-generated Content Differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1024,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Pittsburgh","keywords":"Social media; User-generated content; Microblogging; Advertising; Clothing; Brand awareness; Social media marketing; Content (measure theory); Business; Computer science; World Wide Web; Geography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04138828908812076,"score_gpt":0.316056916004884,"score_spread":0.27466862691676325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2008132350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99672014,0.000048210684,0.0001282591,0.00008183913,0.000006609378,0.000017917098,0.0001869331,0.000004262597,0.0028057275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991491,0.00004504114,0.00011143314,0.00004020214,0.000009978257,0.000018835428,0.0003221671,0.000008326713,0.00029488333],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884254,0.00033012117,0.000082197796,0.00021798545,0.0003642913,0.0001630084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99037766,0.005257014,0.0021127458,0.00039491864,0.0012344685,0.00062314083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013094124,0.00014067932,0.0002909642,0.0021847093,0.0006596504,0.0023915889,0.00033659834,0.00062229426,0.0019735827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012467194,0.00019275903,0.00026561547,0.0021733865,0.0009496599,0.0026870845,0.0009837296,0.00046654997,0.0005352418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023708952,0.00013383837,0.9744921,0.00005922814,0.000093310635,0.00008137969,0.008882158,0.000091091315,0.0021952358,0.0006025536,0.00032278235,0.012809204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043427426,0.000048664366,0.99267936,0.0000107751985,0.000015556987,0.000051410057,0.005461996,0.00051421806,0.00047440978,0.00020863571,0.0005209895,0.000009694243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009451399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011578612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009451399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090210576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003425089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012858535","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2013.06.001","title":"Thematic Discrepancy Analysis: A Method to Gain Insights into Lurkers and Test for Non-Response Bias","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Thematic analysis; Thematic map; Psychology; Computer science; Geography; Sociology; Cartography; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.025905508738417054,"score_gpt":0.3122672512363366,"score_spread":0.2863617424979195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012858535","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14671029,0.00068485626,0.7801397,0.0013934574,0.00081742014,0.048726115,0.007113746,0.0019969875,0.012417454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17065416,0.00020712013,0.6905326,0.0006685015,0.00014248578,0.13258673,0.0026351854,0.0006720735,0.0019011551],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.8249237,0.117317185,0.024241805,0.014790093,0.017253336,0.0014738763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48692012,0.38152787,0.037716277,0.041925445,0.050798405,0.0011118607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14365481,0.0024472252,0.0025806292,0.013264734,0.004345558,0.00511669,0.004696502,0.0029885818,0.009899471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37956142,0.0013639326,0.0032384282,0.013793755,0.003999,0.005052483,0.009357694,0.0036894826,0.0020419941],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030450732,0.0018035456,0.06913555,0.013512423,0.0023427098,0.00094803097,0.29867762,0.0030748795,0.018364701,0.075637355,0.03983296,0.47362515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031455078,0.002525376,0.103813,0.006691251,0.0020336057,0.0016574301,0.20655382,0.12151707,0.03580388,0.23415016,0.2804204,0.0016884526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020376367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032420978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14365481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003449174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055180304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7597283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014798815","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2009.02.009","title":"Personalization without Interrogation: Towards more Effective Interactions between Consumers and Feature-Based Recommendation Agents","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Usability; Preference; Product (mathematics); Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Interrogation; Recommender system; Consumption (sociology); Data science; Risk analysis (engineering); Internet privacy; Human–computer interaction; Business; World Wide Web; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.022691922762485325,"score_gpt":0.3095883802636206,"score_spread":0.2868964575011353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014798815","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28441754,0.00038124033,0.66747606,0.0051981197,0.00007220674,0.0007930182,0.00005305225,0.0039496836,0.037659094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6879733,0.00015704504,0.303518,0.0009469782,0.000060309696,0.00042811397,0.00009679944,0.00024228495,0.0065771914],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916222,0.0063652587,0.0002390574,0.00077486946,0.0007567663,0.00024192467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97944313,0.014902263,0.0011254869,0.0024184538,0.0015410939,0.000569633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009263772,0.0009287268,0.0006976913,0.0006988861,0.0013612587,0.0038224275,0.001851861,0.004064492,0.005053442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032595076,0.00089809374,0.00053422875,0.0004903591,0.0018480485,0.009745055,0.004064314,0.0029064103,0.0019256291],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015366877,0.0031625074,0.031828932,0.0007506364,0.00029077008,0.0015960512,0.124712154,0.0121278735,0.07934864,0.070928544,0.014333686,0.65938354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010518944,0.0019905637,0.020311775,0.00039336443,0.0006941398,0.002148759,0.040145267,0.5091226,0.048746902,0.184434,0.1903762,0.0005844775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022001697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018612419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009263772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006334031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011260364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048992097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021590458","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2009.04.006","title":"Attribute Perceptions, Customer Satisfaction and Intention to Recommend E-Services","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":140,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Customer satisfaction; Service quality; Variance (accounting); Business; Perception; Set (abstract data type); Quality (philosophy); Service (business); Marketing; Process (computing); Knowledge management; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.015545238416837154,"score_gpt":0.27752372651393314,"score_spread":0.261978488097096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021590458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9970265,0.000041601776,0.0006413886,0.000098332835,0.000003245638,0.000015710568,0.00006892198,0.000010102986,0.002094201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946505,0.000025916073,0.00018314464,0.00001898362,0.0000034052864,0.000007836122,0.0000671826,0.000002200823,0.00022621578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998572,0.00058155786,0.00010222581,0.000106428466,0.0004762734,0.00016147539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98344696,0.009795474,0.0033453584,0.00062416634,0.0013615661,0.0014264976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021074202,0.00022711244,0.0002254677,0.0008494553,0.00029528156,0.0018535834,0.0002612917,0.0007891561,0.004332543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013210981,0.00016909976,0.00054783764,0.0010460702,0.0006258618,0.00095745083,0.00052967784,0.0011082371,0.00043193446],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016388747,0.0007560474,0.9868183,0.000027011572,0.00011242121,0.00005527171,0.0007297821,0.0012065925,0.0003797793,0.0009034897,0.00017979393,0.008667664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016657972,0.00041643775,0.9898032,0.000014691329,0.000059770202,0.00007065665,0.0013276087,0.006565124,0.0003217132,0.0010828665,0.00030586627,0.000015443939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048616813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033495417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0048616813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005179943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004691346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014493823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2037464547","doi":"10.1002/dir.1020","title":"Understanding IT-enabled interactivity in contemporary marketing","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":255,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Shell (Canada); University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Interactivity; Conceptualization; Digital marketing; Extant taxon; Marketing research; Marketing; Marketing management; Marketing science; Database transaction; Relationship marketing; Business; Knowledge management; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.1415150835235052,"score_gpt":0.36090503318250605,"score_spread":0.21938994965900085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2037464547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30331078,0.051527947,0.047994588,0.03911675,0.00043400165,0.000114203554,0.000065154556,0.00010174334,0.55733484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97941774,0.011761207,0.0031060085,0.00082480384,0.0003865081,0.000060168004,0.000016421807,0.000017823239,0.004409349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987191,0.00075151556,0.00004659034,0.00011385296,0.00022974773,0.00013924555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971023,0.0021741951,0.000313772,0.000086512664,0.00014917401,0.00017398776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017452668,0.000436183,0.00027140084,0.002696211,0.002124118,0.011425182,0.00050410454,0.0018686294,0.0036873133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031864203,0.00026278244,0.00027823835,0.002758854,0.010694454,0.017403431,0.0029256218,0.0015406698,0.0002641847],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039259976,0.000073334704,0.004807257,0.00033349093,0.000025410227,0.00054968335,0.06693169,0.0008788034,0.0007355643,0.86798257,0.0012166838,0.056426264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025692621,0.00007543477,0.009770018,0.0007298038,0.000031509113,0.0006351663,0.06079414,0.0033175529,0.0005173919,0.76429313,0.15977223,0.000037941692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001954477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018721529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011425182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025594437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014507882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018570125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053474867","doi":"10.1002/dir.20055","title":"Pleasure or utility? Time planning style and Web usage behaviors","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":141,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Personalization; Style (visual arts); Pleasure; Entertainment; Advertising; Exploratory research; Relation (database); Marketing; Empirical research; Market segmentation; Psychology; Computer science; Business; World Wide Web; Sociology; Database","score_opus":0.016475622621878308,"score_gpt":0.3111292136197475,"score_spread":0.2946535909978692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053474867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9932446,0.0002926198,0.00050912704,0.00019489594,0.000010854717,0.000011628433,0.00005988542,0.0000069364205,0.005669457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992592,0.00009759483,0.00014590233,0.00002386071,0.000009680445,0.0000047135054,0.000028278522,0.0000023442835,0.00042846694],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996892,0.00013000322,0.000023634153,0.000037873924,0.000066998145,0.000052399566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934267,0.0030679328,0.0015421151,0.00030431597,0.00034350748,0.0013154369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007364668,0.00016148882,0.00019778476,0.00058734306,0.00022462851,0.0018911427,0.00023972434,0.00039156873,0.004749327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008042712,0.00012497637,0.0003069209,0.00055999804,0.0007758733,0.00068817806,0.00053587323,0.00059632026,0.0003854535],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030732868,0.00040413588,0.96028423,0.00008509738,0.00012720944,0.00020773393,0.0019565374,0.00037715273,0.0014663105,0.0017663371,0.0003716341,0.032646358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000140962065,0.00024953618,0.99248815,0.000028188206,0.000043322216,0.00025552098,0.0021697797,0.0013399865,0.00020860268,0.0024719073,0.0007143767,0.000016589982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000984203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014138025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004749327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024711102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020182553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015888095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2059695243","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2014.10.001","title":"Consumer Fear of Online Identity Theft: Scale Development and Validation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity theft; Scale (ratio); Internet privacy; Business; Identity (music); Psychology; Computer science; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.12064333039175885,"score_gpt":0.4157925778027747,"score_spread":0.29514924741101584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2059695243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92338353,0.0002442951,0.03922918,0.00038262812,0.00015266034,0.027654972,0.0007268592,0.00017020442,0.008055634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72969365,0.0006203844,0.16950107,0.00041961897,0.00010094981,0.09301721,0.0021894837,0.00016276982,0.0042948783],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857163,0.0064760107,0.0018469465,0.00094699295,0.004466647,0.00054713193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9343794,0.038116727,0.0025369176,0.0056704106,0.018386416,0.00091008726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044500783,0.0008830164,0.0009418623,0.002613857,0.0018713137,0.0016560426,0.0016157235,0.0013887124,0.0026565266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058400445,0.0009089516,0.0019987843,0.0021387099,0.0023725564,0.0015005476,0.0029003005,0.002121185,0.0011237973],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027487238,0.012394742,0.35686564,0.0027287027,0.00051276037,0.0008365496,0.0793853,0.004640569,0.027217707,0.01061611,0.0064353794,0.4956178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014781774,0.014577336,0.8372354,0.0013961574,0.00056367216,0.0010891375,0.048418507,0.024423718,0.021394517,0.0100807315,0.03887572,0.00046686322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025752932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033868253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044500783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012012698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004399948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23534542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2063265149","doi":"10.1002/dir.20040","title":"Predicting intentions to return to the Web site: Extending the dual mediation hypothesis","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":70,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Web site; Mediation; Context (archaeology); Perspective (graphical); World Wide Web; Dual (grammatical number); Transactional leadership; Path analysis (statistics); Computer science; Advertising; Path (computing); Test (biology); The Internet; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Sociology; Geography; Artificial intelligence; Art","score_opus":0.019589426799217085,"score_gpt":0.3048953580348961,"score_spread":0.285305931235679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2063265149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9628082,0.0005870434,0.022611305,0.0018028151,0.00006823139,0.00025891606,0.0003521318,0.00009179138,0.011419659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99309325,0.0002517333,0.0052897474,0.00013948753,0.00004341391,0.00019226769,0.0001740833,0.000012233712,0.00080370146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956606,0.0022562535,0.00020150965,0.0007078108,0.00065848406,0.0005152523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581765,0.031787302,0.0037569453,0.002914655,0.0021286604,0.0012359564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009131559,0.0012162889,0.00090523,0.0026179575,0.0007447663,0.0027148176,0.0016187355,0.0014811349,0.008747671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0392348,0.00068222225,0.0016282388,0.0012385,0.001844488,0.0044490537,0.0036811926,0.0020531279,0.0008536458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007358639,0.002525731,0.8660309,0.00038810118,0.0013190092,0.00047887734,0.0053065415,0.0033807736,0.0012129493,0.027252069,0.0010025344,0.09036665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089333917,0.0037743484,0.67364883,0.00061608106,0.002754656,0.0015871282,0.011212322,0.1274139,0.0032040162,0.16884239,0.0057830196,0.00027000366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063600526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028475786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009131559,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007889821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015566376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048292935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2093015399","doi":"10.1002/dir.20027","title":"Can we predict customer lifetime value?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Customer churn and segmentation","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":246,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Profitability index; Customer lifetime value; Profit (economics); Customer profitability; Customer value; Marketing; Sample (material); Value (mathematics); Business; Econometrics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Customer retention; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.01001644444592861,"score_gpt":0.24534570798154567,"score_spread":0.23532926353561706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093015399","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9073489,0.006152094,0.042666834,0.024972815,0.00036147918,0.00008524166,0.0036482187,0.0003612302,0.014403243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99372125,0.0008362295,0.0030258405,0.00036277017,0.00015813153,0.000023138564,0.00108619,0.000018514576,0.0007679844],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878615,0.0005716484,0.000058326375,0.00018508492,0.00022806993,0.00017061071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97713315,0.016041685,0.0027441313,0.0013851055,0.0019778314,0.0007180976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004517358,0.00078784686,0.00079649844,0.0023058678,0.00046364055,0.0030188821,0.0013236154,0.0022461945,0.0031695853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050180737,0.00032172873,0.00048042976,0.0026999614,0.0010903629,0.0086308345,0.0007147708,0.0026182376,0.0015296742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002941563,0.00023154083,0.75831664,0.00010818929,0.0002544582,0.00013067867,0.00052118505,0.061277557,0.0001169485,0.010743991,0.010383236,0.15762141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000602316,0.0004101833,0.28397578,0.00028140942,0.00017875347,0.00050907535,0.0014710629,0.5629274,0.0006689177,0.14061563,0.008756433,0.00014513136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010815449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009071791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010815449,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012112337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063451665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023890376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2120586626","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.008","title":"Managing Customer Relationships in the Social Media Era: Introducing the Social CRM House","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":786,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Berger (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Social media; Business; Customer relationship management; Marketing; Economic shortage; Customer engagement; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.028869182212295424,"score_gpt":0.31076817151067115,"score_spread":0.28189898929837576,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2120586626","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071207464,0.0054861596,0.42856422,0.15381932,0.005913683,0.000643648,0.00007216529,0.0011471935,0.33314615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5989991,0.0073445817,0.30596542,0.01750358,0.0055916235,0.0007409807,0.000056963374,0.0005021411,0.06329562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674356,0.0021181798,0.00007780373,0.00020870422,0.00051144947,0.00034032215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958332,0.0021856134,0.00032577768,0.00042543997,0.00046893646,0.00076115615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046708873,0.00049912476,0.00027757513,0.0010966627,0.0031961496,0.008104272,0.0017158516,0.003751995,0.004488088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039514643,0.0005164195,0.00067550095,0.00088032265,0.009259702,0.014637455,0.008224005,0.003994482,0.001218014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004224983,0.00029331195,0.0019519178,0.0001761256,0.000021754906,0.0015174103,0.022203308,0.0019015165,0.0029789077,0.80952954,0.03811439,0.12126957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003859929,0.0004034124,0.001880642,0.00041122737,0.00003350374,0.0014631817,0.01917269,0.016496398,0.002848277,0.1625388,0.79461175,0.000101550395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015759725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003505235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008104272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015659857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027533022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02470231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155824414","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2012.09.003","title":"A Cross-national Investigation of the Satisfaction and Loyalty Linkage for Mobile Telecommunications Services across Eight Countries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Customer Service Quality and Loyalty","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loyalty; Loyalty business model; Business; Marketing; Customer satisfaction; Context (archaeology); Mobile telephony; Linkage (software); Advertising; Telecommunications; Service quality; Service (business); Geography; Engineering; Mobile radio","score_opus":0.02096641623442972,"score_gpt":0.31493710666321273,"score_spread":0.293970690428783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155824414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994406,0.000017268345,0.000035193607,0.00001301858,8.5586754e-7,0.0000031805162,0.000059290094,4.695191e-7,0.00043011372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996855,0.000020976275,0.00005557977,0.000010897772,8.321095e-7,0.0000045759957,0.0001119176,6.428352e-7,0.00010906157],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942577,0.0002083081,0.000054979075,0.00007802486,0.00009697283,0.00013600173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677867,0.0009810539,0.0010082651,0.00018953197,0.00071165315,0.0003308988],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010951015,0.00013757274,0.0002526247,0.0010954463,0.00074336596,0.00095704355,0.0002050769,0.00027490983,0.0014671094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027253118,0.00015066966,0.00034044834,0.0020164147,0.00046653734,0.0005958388,0.0009991218,0.0004986243,0.00021995588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002377273,0.00003305894,0.99550253,0.000007927346,0.000034842957,0.000044442542,0.0012210964,0.00004595101,0.00013125701,0.00009497129,0.00006994101,0.0027901921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011669403,0.000057616602,0.9947884,0.000005371956,0.000016081609,0.00006874746,0.00462423,0.00014090426,0.00007009549,0.000015600734,0.00020875999,0.0000030193487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020789312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03736718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020789312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005782507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004600872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041336656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155933408","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2013.09.003","title":"GOSIP in Cyberspace: Conceptualization and Scale Development for General Online Social Interaction Propensity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Interactivity; Conceptualization; Online participation; Psychology; The Internet; Scale (ratio); Social media; Social relation; Social psychology; Computer-mediated communication; Trait; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03395986270689985,"score_gpt":0.3319680918493874,"score_spread":0.2980082291424876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155933408","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93652415,0.00018324536,0.045829732,0.0002353505,0.00005336753,0.0015473691,0.0007728788,0.00013296783,0.014720775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9677932,0.00008897626,0.028645454,0.000042400112,0.000021724678,0.0022324654,0.00068372133,0.000025361158,0.00046666313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739444,0.0011994286,0.0003258733,0.00027823303,0.0006854262,0.00011657139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98665875,0.007811605,0.0020620513,0.0013482956,0.0015905483,0.0005287528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051242127,0.0005262345,0.00034379144,0.0030347665,0.0007702532,0.0014851078,0.0007880669,0.0007645896,0.002688039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01908679,0.00024754918,0.0011078328,0.0022619888,0.0016176723,0.0018054578,0.0022971237,0.0010084449,0.00038412504],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018387088,0.00043289122,0.8924872,0.00024931598,0.00023462964,0.00019496125,0.013599235,0.0021610828,0.002392889,0.015956916,0.0016501992,0.070456795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062966894,0.00061685295,0.92998993,0.00016067404,0.00014459621,0.00042263148,0.011371025,0.024371706,0.001528522,0.022338398,0.008898588,0.00009409378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012914349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017148945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051242127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007023611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006933996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027099729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158705702","doi":"10.1002/dir.20075","title":"Giving an “e-human touch” to e-tailing: The moderating roles of static information quantity and consumption motive in the effectiveness of an anthropomorphic information agent","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Consumption (sociology); Product (mathematics); Web site; Computer science; Advertising; E-commerce; The Internet; Business; Internet privacy; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.021207736728038547,"score_gpt":0.3541455660834724,"score_spread":0.33293782935543387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158705702","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99206924,0.000079016456,0.00084339257,0.00011474033,0.0000075694315,0.000033878576,0.00001155661,0.000022715649,0.0068178936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968759,0.00006590618,0.0019207936,0.000111603156,0.000010601848,0.000028262915,0.00001794887,0.0000128229285,0.0009562653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847955,0.0009507656,0.00007223396,0.00018487431,0.00022021595,0.00009236969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9767482,0.01730662,0.0026901718,0.0013861387,0.0005109606,0.0013578611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022445514,0.0005018282,0.00034442788,0.00042869346,0.0006008748,0.0017464637,0.0003957555,0.0008854273,0.009536465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017829757,0.00034054733,0.00031425036,0.00023412399,0.0010386384,0.0015541391,0.0011122735,0.00069299527,0.0005744885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.014217159,0.021836199,0.5408913,0.0026338066,0.0011806936,0.002035578,0.020852847,0.003918797,0.09830442,0.008409678,0.0016937236,0.28402585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077660603,0.012262535,0.9352403,0.00025340114,0.0012142719,0.0009603661,0.011179214,0.012833959,0.0086743105,0.0053075007,0.011133839,0.00016366581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007034969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087168335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009536465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024212316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026397195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03190267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167735411","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2015.09.004","title":"Connecting with and Converting Shoppers into Customers: Investigating the Role of Regulatory Fit in the Online Customer's Decision-making Process","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Business; Marketing; Promotion (chess); Preference; Advertising; Customer engagement; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Social psychology; Social media; Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.025865031989819386,"score_gpt":0.3004945397203187,"score_spread":0.2746295077304993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167735411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99713194,0.000009730875,0.0005075478,0.00005502385,0.0000010733315,0.000013302446,0.0000024840117,0.000002035202,0.0022767475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993961,0.000014750541,0.00033945433,0.000033650875,0.0000014853467,0.000007603898,0.0000046746554,0.0000018303806,0.00020048904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984267,0.0010153122,0.000046732646,0.00013463937,0.000200201,0.00017644455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917286,0.0053795455,0.0014358272,0.00031183436,0.00035389978,0.00079030957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024036122,0.0001868107,0.00020075803,0.0006312281,0.0010439244,0.004094176,0.00034383486,0.0008974125,0.0022921774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108996285,0.00023780641,0.0002524357,0.00036925328,0.0016278892,0.0017868121,0.0011078459,0.0011194396,0.0002356109],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008430114,0.0038593814,0.6795966,0.000164282,0.00009444876,0.0015664131,0.2143743,0.0010543735,0.013401587,0.011559918,0.0003799125,0.07310589],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007078968,0.0011491335,0.7601988,0.00011624323,0.000109049615,0.0011170158,0.20870003,0.01102382,0.004807679,0.009500173,0.003081504,0.00012570714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017238838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018916155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004094176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005153907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000885143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012711704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769310279","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2017.10.001","title":"Watch Your Tone: How a Brand's Tone of Voice on Social Media Influences Consumer Responses","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":220,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Tone (literature); Social media; Situational ethics; Perception; Set (abstract data type); Advertising; Value (mathematics); Business; Psychology; Human voice; Marketing; Social psychology; Computer science; Speech recognition","score_opus":0.0614041933848687,"score_gpt":0.40422202054860096,"score_spread":0.34281782716373227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769310279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956043,0.000070467926,0.00019226015,0.00012859203,0.000016883441,0.000017134113,0.0000211927,0.0000027510255,0.00394651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987179,0.00007644708,0.00022359924,0.00013702843,0.000016737398,0.000017337676,0.0000265134,0.000005098604,0.0007792087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985071,0.0009064908,0.000060662274,0.00014042301,0.0002795224,0.00010578125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98138636,0.014561326,0.0019873527,0.00046946452,0.0009210179,0.0006744341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025632104,0.0001800371,0.0001786632,0.00043366084,0.0005798037,0.0025923538,0.00023143539,0.00073622784,0.0038155885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016653048,0.00016361392,0.00025779937,0.0003046133,0.00073641026,0.0013486164,0.00074249436,0.0007021972,0.0004113461],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001256553,0.0010131951,0.8178033,0.0004441678,0.00040381183,0.0004246202,0.10132296,0.0002626814,0.01973566,0.0014797921,0.0012405684,0.054612655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000325797,0.0006458892,0.94103825,0.00009950534,0.00020674396,0.00018332315,0.05088531,0.00073458534,0.0021268416,0.00081835175,0.0031820945,0.000046565397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017975672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002987166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038155885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033843535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020636246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013555706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799874695","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2017.12.003","title":"Dyad Calling Behavior: Asymmetric Power and Tie Strength Dynamics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dyad; Power (physics); Dynamics (music); Computer science; Psychology; Physics; Social psychology; Acoustics","score_opus":0.04514419665706388,"score_gpt":0.3703245216541691,"score_spread":0.32518032499710525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799874695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82471806,0.00041545206,0.14700793,0.0032348654,0.000071664006,0.00017074785,0.00074311194,0.00016617645,0.023471974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98741734,0.00019398012,0.005415992,0.000115046416,0.00004114495,0.00011884348,0.00017701347,0.000022248509,0.006498412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883777,0.00056415197,0.00004089522,0.00026088147,0.00011356262,0.00018283709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99389726,0.0035253365,0.0012992213,0.0004321984,0.00028712285,0.0005588318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002652758,0.0004034312,0.0009103835,0.0009831407,0.00093677134,0.0027433205,0.0017833096,0.0020057955,0.011215503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013635899,0.0004993772,0.0006540639,0.0008578803,0.0011665835,0.0030452644,0.001620566,0.0020654828,0.0016005391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007130616,0.0009108176,0.14959992,0.00022463588,0.00040912122,0.0025381679,0.008644911,0.31224987,0.005822948,0.44733086,0.0122199,0.059335735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088942244,0.00013641758,0.022365687,0.000035666497,0.000100017234,0.0006107966,0.0011986174,0.89733243,0.00024397137,0.07393222,0.0038753462,0.000079824546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067168847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051932223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011215503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012636002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062706345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037519634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994007112","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2019.10.004","title":"Thinking beyond Privacy Calculus: Investigating Reactions to Customer Surveillance","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Consumer privacy; Value (mathematics); Information privacy; Internet privacy; Pragmatism; Archetype; Consumer behaviour; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Epistemology","score_opus":0.033715771741192065,"score_gpt":0.3265893701805906,"score_spread":0.29287359843939853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994007112","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778261,0.00012408418,0.0026439563,0.0019214243,0.000026268704,0.000116927695,0.00002459913,0.000010880721,0.017305756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768054,0.00010782241,0.00066172995,0.0007705154,0.000018198883,0.00007252217,0.000017584864,0.000007751716,0.0006632814],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98915255,0.0072876737,0.00024274124,0.0006446166,0.0019629656,0.0007094598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9414099,0.04382555,0.008652944,0.0017705577,0.0030890224,0.0012520454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0096295085,0.00043382088,0.00031213427,0.0009396198,0.0024671932,0.008486949,0.00083869643,0.002284723,0.003645384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049084082,0.0003152526,0.0004804172,0.0009982522,0.0042131585,0.0061286283,0.0027420307,0.00452691,0.0003990044],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011452533,0.0017638276,0.24611449,0.00044005158,0.00017167589,0.000985807,0.6130781,0.0015110367,0.0074773533,0.06638811,0.002662603,0.05826173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014463345,0.0011809908,0.27954012,0.00034189204,0.00021592577,0.0005801697,0.6099465,0.014679128,0.006044946,0.072638564,0.014419217,0.0002679883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022294703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011452177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0096295085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027355915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013612969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050926268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3087932985","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2020.06.002","title":"Emoji, Playfulness, and Brand Engagement on Twitter","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Communication and Language","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":187,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; Saint Mary's University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Emoji; Advertising; Social media; Business; Psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.03532268393378892,"score_gpt":0.28026251528500157,"score_spread":0.24493983135121264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3087932985","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922443,0.00012921373,0.0008100295,0.00017190445,0.000017767949,0.000019605266,0.00037675817,0.00003685437,0.0061936625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99749714,0.00011281841,0.0007303786,0.00008479641,0.000026582255,0.000032346266,0.00029238238,0.000020388125,0.0012031577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996507,0.00013182331,0.000019567737,0.00006400332,0.00008266255,0.000051158582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553347,0.0029100447,0.00086370984,0.00018804776,0.00024942902,0.00025529801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004965026,0.00032774892,0.00022084481,0.00066887826,0.00050412567,0.0017950559,0.00016377032,0.0003985273,0.003684221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066418615,0.00015112059,0.00021802058,0.0005837398,0.00045462546,0.0014819925,0.0010443376,0.0004999468,0.0006215894],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001852214,0.0006390345,0.77169925,0.0008299083,0.00030533067,0.0006237564,0.030384677,0.0015813315,0.05327003,0.0029876528,0.003062884,0.13276392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016678354,0.00037532795,0.97473586,0.000106597356,0.00010455353,0.00025179517,0.010029991,0.0039340747,0.003548136,0.0018477751,0.0050010732,0.00004818605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009214389,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002463566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003684221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024091147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010420797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012324929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095091665","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2020.08.004","title":"“Now you See Me”: The Attention-Grabbing Effect of Product Similarity and Proximity in Online Shopping","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Similarity (geometry); Business; Product (mathematics); Advertising; Computer science; Internet privacy; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01881233040543147,"score_gpt":0.26378787736404624,"score_spread":0.2449755469586148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095091665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984357,0.00006873438,0.00013127064,0.000026763879,0.0000025522872,0.000007161665,0.0000101916685,0.0000032731164,0.0013143276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993924,0.000048099573,0.00027490614,0.000049434217,0.000004895392,0.0000084434405,0.000020590725,0.0000037692607,0.0001974994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935466,0.0001999051,0.000044388482,0.0001525676,0.00019367949,0.000054779848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99127054,0.005717861,0.0016991548,0.00042137344,0.00033471346,0.00055627053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008038059,0.00018244697,0.00032218697,0.00056597684,0.00042110778,0.0010112094,0.00035826652,0.0005668011,0.0029558477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014829098,0.00023298053,0.00019870794,0.00042413315,0.0006240737,0.0009751586,0.0012000358,0.0006016897,0.00019336246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012506105,0.003906741,0.58095145,0.0009154067,0.0004684538,0.0010653925,0.03760644,0.0015390905,0.22773518,0.0020428095,0.0011485731,0.1301144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006871737,0.0005379184,0.99395186,0.000023336355,0.000059162925,0.0002524009,0.0017532632,0.0007734314,0.0016281129,0.00057629426,0.00035589398,0.000019546495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035982784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048071216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035982784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000388634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002675198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009888291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124794763","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2020.08.003","title":"Empirical Analyses of Nonlinear Effects of Reserve Prices on Ending Prices in Online Auctions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Auction Theory and Applications","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Common value auction; Economics; Reservation price; Open market operation; Competition (biology); Mid price; Price level; Econometrics; Monetary economics; Microeconomics; Monetary policy","score_opus":0.16212892555480343,"score_gpt":0.512086495261459,"score_spread":0.3499575697066556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124794763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9954,0.00030061195,0.0025043231,0.000114536815,0.000007536288,0.000019648645,0.0001604625,0.00002142671,0.0014714149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983902,0.00012583287,0.0005515482,0.000017494564,0.000013265394,0.000013684068,0.00026910193,0.000015333808,0.0006035984],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544036,0.0029395102,0.0003004934,0.00048562416,0.00049140997,0.0003426203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.703559,0.25269547,0.026999095,0.010354321,0.0042915405,0.0021006311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01282951,0.00045182265,0.0008055081,0.0009801086,0.00051047414,0.0020887624,0.0015365097,0.0008722819,0.006694696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116153695,0.0004588442,0.0013489756,0.0016111188,0.001555134,0.003203508,0.0011234436,0.0035761506,0.0010887977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031924255,0.0017274226,0.9145015,0.00024893973,0.00079406664,0.00057895354,0.0012291938,0.030241087,0.0019166769,0.008918324,0.0008662433,0.035785228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010347894,0.00081281294,0.87054545,0.0000543828,0.00031291263,0.0003091391,0.0008716219,0.1168104,0.0012540318,0.00812245,0.0007157118,0.00008759401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005493944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00391297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01282951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010441531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055454206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067849755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154236075","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2021.02.001","title":"Using Speech Acts to Elicit Positive Emotions for Complainants on Social Media","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"Natural Resources, Energy and Science Authority of Sri Lanka; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Social media; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.08470621916703934,"score_gpt":0.3699638223338486,"score_spread":0.28525760316680926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154236075","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98826444,0.0002079151,0.007017129,0.00022472709,0.000042353055,0.00010014691,0.00030277562,0.00012215426,0.0037182826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9935134,0.0001555346,0.004624389,0.0001248793,0.00004407061,0.00007620233,0.00028175954,0.000027139078,0.0011527209],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880683,0.0005787608,0.00008165101,0.00014221286,0.00029301964,0.000097522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930582,0.004889581,0.0011459677,0.00022495826,0.00051948923,0.00016184665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001285734,0.000567861,0.00030277588,0.0006969994,0.00044560584,0.0012106784,0.0002537061,0.0004524614,0.0011239005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008446298,0.00012483346,0.00043241234,0.000566475,0.0005257379,0.0009068025,0.0006698444,0.00077867974,0.00046453398],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039004972,0.0007862669,0.41923583,0.0023122807,0.0004588122,0.0017462518,0.03323503,0.005180407,0.2057592,0.0023046997,0.0066430317,0.3184377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006831308,0.0012777518,0.853921,0.00022449829,0.00044264615,0.00080136507,0.02218302,0.056602534,0.047154255,0.0024800585,0.0146590425,0.00018551153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012019887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026317101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.001285734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043432318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017832979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.006799698},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196314924","doi":"10.1016/j.intmar.2021.06.001","title":"Fleeting, But Not Forgotten: Ephemerality as a Means to Increase Recall of Advertising","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Misinformation and Its Impacts","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Ephemeral key; Recall; Advertising; Popularity; Media content; Social media; Content (measure theory); Internet privacy; Psychology; Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Multimedia; World Wide Web; Cognitive psychology","score_opus":0.021944480238842008,"score_gpt":0.3486643095559426,"score_spread":0.3267198293171006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196314924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755107,0.0012755403,0.0028343152,0.0007983783,0.000048439284,0.000052922387,0.00007642418,0.00007771664,0.019325586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99257034,0.00065405254,0.004319945,0.00030255015,0.00006958261,0.000032235068,0.000050518254,0.00002475889,0.0019760523],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987556,0.000628953,0.00007026224,0.00015168179,0.00031515397,0.000078357785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97626585,0.017525662,0.0030475182,0.0019800381,0.0006723037,0.00050862134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022632526,0.00026725823,0.00024389445,0.00067923934,0.0004870623,0.0022591637,0.00043546676,0.00068296096,0.004798274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020497987,0.0001911105,0.0002597044,0.00045054316,0.0008982791,0.0025004644,0.0011349596,0.0010587999,0.00040478195],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004726049,0.005022689,0.22069745,0.0025763651,0.00069453486,0.0007966884,0.05092997,0.0012152172,0.052180454,0.022053208,0.005227125,0.6338802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006706338,0.011568754,0.8057894,0.0019207614,0.0024764517,0.0029790245,0.029489366,0.007247265,0.046953954,0.02809551,0.062494483,0.00031429515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015148376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004798274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036108954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000416536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01605177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307329762","doi":"10.1177/10949968221129268","title":"Let's Laugh About It! Using Humor to Address Complainers’ Online Incivility","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Humor Studies and Applications","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"Academy of Marketing","keywords":"Incivility; Complaint; Psychology; Social psychology; Social media; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06379547628147358,"score_gpt":0.4100841730342826,"score_spread":0.346288696752809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307329762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789499,0.00031304138,0.005733472,0.0015777315,0.0000720094,0.000085789216,0.000018832454,0.00019226073,0.013056915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929448,0.00017789235,0.0026046154,0.00073237385,0.000037850627,0.00003363988,0.00002050656,0.000025685104,0.003422627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99758315,0.0015173386,0.00005697401,0.00013311442,0.0005105591,0.00019891291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845994,0.008163175,0.0032661404,0.0017096958,0.0012759638,0.0009855785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027123801,0.00039691673,0.0002602708,0.00065298047,0.0012475959,0.0017449437,0.00039528095,0.0007587376,0.002846807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018427333,0.00013689412,0.00022157181,0.00027487287,0.0013822496,0.0012902595,0.0012714451,0.0010141829,0.00083132304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009792546,0.0032086512,0.19125982,0.00095462264,0.00025509606,0.0016466251,0.13082278,0.00067290565,0.06139077,0.005935827,0.0138335405,0.58904016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028593512,0.010794281,0.4690021,0.0011774988,0.00044323516,0.0059433803,0.22567572,0.011849201,0.08097863,0.014761175,0.1786263,0.00046253382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008262269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016621858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002846807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004157426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057545025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014344633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4364360094","doi":"10.1177/10949968221150933","title":"The Effects of Linguistic Coordination on Perceived Quality of Consumer Reviews: A Dual Process Perspective","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Matching (statistics); Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Component (thermodynamics); Process (computing); Dual (grammatical number); Natural language processing; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.029195753628613343,"score_gpt":0.40410201544595786,"score_spread":0.37490626181734454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4364360094","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98542863,0.00028843613,0.0076343906,0.0006597944,0.000011776169,0.00009959363,0.00005651418,0.000039619536,0.005781296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997509,0.0000491091,0.0021413756,0.00003717148,0.000014778943,0.000033570203,0.000025701542,0.000008691118,0.00018060536],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97664,0.013465514,0.0012773707,0.00172999,0.0062134294,0.0006736398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7270428,0.19428645,0.052242827,0.009213226,0.012586172,0.0046284897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016501822,0.00041572197,0.0006201187,0.0027763904,0.0009880847,0.0047320733,0.0005979081,0.001006893,0.0017270715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11766406,0.00048247477,0.00088297774,0.0016841784,0.0020882713,0.0023754102,0.0031766861,0.0015304522,0.00019517475],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035017305,0.0018278632,0.82215816,0.0007186212,0.0010317714,0.0006385846,0.03887026,0.004143758,0.022179632,0.0086423205,0.00046983984,0.09581751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027539156,0.0018015567,0.960245,0.00010362285,0.00043512997,0.0002847275,0.008128101,0.016249064,0.0037487198,0.007437782,0.0011674771,0.00012344612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003377861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018517202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016501822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018047567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011744195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087271035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382699635","doi":"10.1177/10949968231172153","title":"Should We Feed the Trolls? Using Marketer-Generated Content to Explain Average Toxicity and Product Usage","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; HEC Montréal","funders":"Institut de Valorisation des Données","keywords":"Social media; Product (mathematics); Set (abstract data type); Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Toxicity; Field (mathematics); Advertising; User-generated content; New product development; Marketing; Business; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Chemistry","score_opus":0.10685204936909719,"score_gpt":0.347986886236314,"score_spread":0.24113483686721682,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382699635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95230865,0.0014126712,0.021311479,0.005515172,0.00019013675,0.00022556892,0.0026482192,0.0005208289,0.015867244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864476,0.00048956653,0.008568891,0.00061166816,0.00011841862,0.00007641642,0.0011061593,0.00008291381,0.002498409],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998904,0.00048256063,0.000074779055,0.00016361373,0.00027319725,0.00010182558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842009,0.009122813,0.003326818,0.0010595603,0.0019048494,0.0003850886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002967189,0.00066028733,0.00050347834,0.0022353926,0.00059916714,0.0026161761,0.0005568574,0.0016163151,0.0036478997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025592845,0.00028527604,0.0006231118,0.0018908286,0.0010485252,0.00517457,0.0006940736,0.0012154996,0.0013701128],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00091540656,0.00061730517,0.8148546,0.00056592,0.00038940727,0.00054703583,0.0038605442,0.005871867,0.0042152395,0.007820988,0.0067824544,0.15355915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008987649,0.0011987054,0.76206315,0.0005795571,0.00046578975,0.00085770036,0.0066270297,0.15115844,0.0063217017,0.032764923,0.03766448,0.00020867675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074100457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065876967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0074100457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011192497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045440125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015692234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387024174","doi":"10.1177/10949968231189505","title":"Surprising Consequences of Innocuous Mobile Transaction Reminders of Credit Card Use","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Baycrest Hospital","funders":"Yonsei University","keywords":"Credit card; Payment; Database transaction; Business; Mobile payment; Salience (neuroscience); Intervention (counseling); Chargeback; Provisioning; Nudge theory; Government (linguistics); Advertising; Internet privacy; Card security code; Finance; Computer science; Psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.10990272275081304,"score_gpt":0.3980691408145219,"score_spread":0.28816641806370885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387024174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992785,0.00021155729,0.00073359034,0.0019413477,0.00006960828,0.000024549021,0.00009580188,0.000029689645,0.004108918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840826,0.00010654099,0.00037215554,0.00047262607,0.0000306552,0.000012985675,0.000045454322,0.000013018534,0.00053822563],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809045,0.000975129,0.00014149971,0.00024297221,0.0003196357,0.00023032771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97552335,0.016975071,0.0032838602,0.0022499417,0.0008988205,0.0010690597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025513188,0.00024761198,0.00028756083,0.00036952956,0.0007811733,0.0011843808,0.00046359395,0.0009716862,0.005078659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028779361,0.00025346503,0.00035811594,0.0003405324,0.00091036485,0.0010854867,0.001052166,0.0019492222,0.00044332474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010883193,0.006230699,0.70953506,0.00048837316,0.00044447382,0.0040061497,0.009927279,0.0022302356,0.031345427,0.009217651,0.010794273,0.2048973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026110306,0.0029543277,0.9502716,0.00014697431,0.00026215197,0.0014990993,0.0067017693,0.0035240548,0.013463963,0.013510706,0.0072994838,0.000104881154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002429693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040204823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005078659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057804654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004251733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016989827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392782131","doi":"10.1177/10949968231223111","title":"The Effect of Online Engagement on New Product Performance: Why Fit and Brand Longevity Matter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Longevity; Product (mathematics); Business; Marketing; Mathematics; Medicine; Gerontology","score_opus":0.016262230523731335,"score_gpt":0.32437328340569177,"score_spread":0.30811105288196045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392782131","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857195,0.00075800804,0.00055808784,0.0007904815,0.00002031113,0.000020922545,0.00018052512,0.000013566734,0.011938607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99894744,0.000113592534,0.00009154991,0.00006450045,0.000012520115,0.0000059483386,0.00007658471,0.000005146818,0.00068268616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998845,0.00027225836,0.0000572361,0.00021819396,0.0003731526,0.00023413551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879716,0.005353884,0.0036588027,0.0006307172,0.0008576567,0.0015274059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017266687,0.00026087524,0.00031485432,0.0009769417,0.00083181664,0.0030954692,0.0004475643,0.00077101326,0.0071055493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011459945,0.00014640503,0.0005337806,0.0010311003,0.0016507454,0.002262878,0.0016498325,0.0011782893,0.00070345943],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027821164,0.00024445503,0.96447873,0.00008049072,0.00012462094,0.00013896916,0.0029211089,0.00021171967,0.0007699106,0.0018480832,0.000531162,0.02837245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006639941,0.00009354023,0.9944107,0.000042526535,0.000052021882,0.000027789145,0.0023885276,0.00048893766,0.0002475667,0.00079151645,0.0014397089,0.0000105556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026966047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038282726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026966047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013101883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089837454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053618133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401176378","doi":"10.1177/10949968241265855","title":"Unlocking Marketing Creativity Using Artificial Intelligence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Creativity in Education and Neuroscience","field":"Psychology","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Agile software development; Computer science; Process (computing); Computational creativity; Ideation; Knowledge management; Creativity technique; Marketing and artificial intelligence; Comprehension; Generative grammar; Artificial intelligence; Management science; Data science; Psychology; Cognitive science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0968395710764078,"score_gpt":0.43873687882191076,"score_spread":0.341897307745503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401176378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64084303,0.006032881,0.160446,0.012743209,0.00019657782,0.00022491938,0.000043337084,0.00034523025,0.1791248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95786315,0.0012281975,0.0383867,0.000493437,0.000060514063,0.000063549574,0.000017952936,0.000026333571,0.0018600897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971783,0.0016594589,0.00010345542,0.00023897437,0.00063049805,0.00018929486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866115,0.01110249,0.00076135766,0.00090358465,0.0003085962,0.00031247546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040708357,0.0004474063,0.00028256266,0.0018396972,0.0012787861,0.0073819924,0.001060215,0.0010775,0.0019617036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009533061,0.00025074795,0.0006616848,0.0011409736,0.007936395,0.0067225886,0.003903073,0.0019025202,0.000214499],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002853694,0.00043514426,0.018062983,0.0011656559,0.00017614782,0.0006792299,0.04756218,0.0117772585,0.009766421,0.5042684,0.0029934577,0.4028277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016216862,0.0003710523,0.018898783,0.0008335829,0.00012144143,0.0012814093,0.02781869,0.04303284,0.009621708,0.81823105,0.07948405,0.00014323196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004768785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00061533257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0073819924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015649945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014493508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0215289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412707204","doi":"10.1177/10949968251365181","title":"How and When Trustworthiness Beliefs Influence Digital Commerce Behavior: A Regulatory Focus Perspective","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Interactive Marketing","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"University of Cape Town","keywords":"Regulatory focus theory; Perspective (graphical); Trustworthiness; Focus (optics); Business; Psychology; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02829755847445439,"score_gpt":0.3514800177483359,"score_spread":0.32318245927388156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412707204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9822969,0.00030759352,0.0026681838,0.000869846,0.000011035988,0.00004471775,0.000010467583,0.000005581907,0.013785668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991296,0.00009676231,0.000413065,0.00009814691,0.000006219424,0.0000107649,0.000005453857,0.000001987402,0.00023801814],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99611616,0.0025264001,0.000113049246,0.00031229947,0.000605994,0.00032615566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961839,0.027854407,0.0049849767,0.0014031531,0.002257169,0.00166125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070217196,0.00028926646,0.00027663566,0.0011483928,0.00081468874,0.0035457585,0.00044152158,0.0010206482,0.001741753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027801389,0.0003489113,0.00041215052,0.00050768716,0.0022534302,0.002250943,0.0013744622,0.0012352755,0.00015100306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008725237,0.0026415149,0.8047301,0.00025618327,0.00036305192,0.0004478918,0.0646422,0.0011419889,0.009459235,0.04060897,0.00069676357,0.074139655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015944174,0.0013778402,0.9114702,0.00033825968,0.00051324855,0.00028910046,0.03768268,0.009244097,0.004459936,0.030268705,0.0040799845,0.00011647244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005334813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045362846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070217196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011503531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013432424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037134886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}