{"meta":{"query_hash":"133c859872b8","filters":{"venue":"Journal of International Arbitration"},"cohort_total":19,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":19,"exported":19,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/133c859872b8","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+International+Arbitration"},"results":[{"id":"W1494244047","doi":"10.54648/joia2010014","title":"Compensation for Moral Damages in Investor-State Arbitration Disputes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Arbitration; Compensation (psychology); Tribunal; Treaty; Business; Context (archaeology); International arbitration; Law; State (computer science); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02021563095540273,"score_gpt":0.2542345885366602,"score_spread":0.23401895758125746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494244047","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35895827,0.007886688,0.065547004,0.024509594,0.0013992827,0.00031120656,0.00008377441,0.00019915395,0.54110503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98740166,0.0006429818,0.0021204432,0.0008528139,0.0004475046,0.00007321534,0.000014110938,0.00001718429,0.008430114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9666953,0.01602908,0.0027091242,0.0022742809,0.007881099,0.004411113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770831,0.012904884,0.003597615,0.0023119126,0.0032799514,0.0008224768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02489294,0.00071202824,0.0013548248,0.0037789682,0.0061753243,0.012178761,0.002302681,0.015363618,0.006725257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06127659,0.0006472792,0.0013552919,0.0020310374,0.011156395,0.009840202,0.009414381,0.006635082,0.0008626624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106675165,0.0000692839,0.0015763036,0.00008893752,0.000052934138,0.00051486783,0.0018649218,0.0030542435,0.000701406,0.975438,0.002287202,0.014245206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016530007,0.0003360788,0.0058036684,0.00050871447,0.00019386507,0.0014885415,0.0026928708,0.02184435,0.0031598175,0.9099065,0.053715542,0.00018476325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014959859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015553486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02489294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005161447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00340931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.131648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498047094","doi":"10.54648/joia2010018","title":"Peeking Through the Form of Uniform Law: International Arbitration Practice and Legal Harmonization","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Harmonization; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Praxis; Legal practice; International arbitration; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.013004244409300423,"score_gpt":0.2571184919214895,"score_spread":0.24411424751218908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498047094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08390239,0.016744884,0.039139435,0.10206629,0.00044386834,0.00006530128,0.000022172304,0.000082111925,0.7575336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982524,0.002820937,0.0037537601,0.002571224,0.0001555632,0.00003484208,0.000012391863,0.000024860768,0.00810239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96763337,0.01820312,0.0012383709,0.002571895,0.006686867,0.0036663034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873531,0.007151498,0.0012087954,0.002089902,0.0015194216,0.00067734986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023783604,0.0002905512,0.00058479287,0.0025621268,0.014210844,0.020078478,0.0021050712,0.0057236296,0.0024249349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035003163,0.0003549182,0.0003876315,0.0050163516,0.0996027,0.017014362,0.010928614,0.0072210496,0.00022847619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024760675,0.00000425769,0.00015741214,0.000010073566,9.510361e-7,0.000024841129,0.012971459,0.00006732232,0.000018580642,0.9803538,0.00053012476,0.005858779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010950946,0.00003324306,0.002117954,0.00045660397,0.0000113806345,0.00016415183,0.03619374,0.000804086,0.0002861838,0.82498795,0.13489866,0.00003515945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.077819325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06620881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077819325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021855535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023121348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15857375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1500727388","doi":"10.54648/joia2013018","title":"The Use and Misuse of the Corruption Defence in International Investment Arbitration","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Language change; Investment arbitration; Business; International investment; Investment (military); Law; Foreign direct investment; International trade; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.02772930532844129,"score_gpt":0.2437732466209832,"score_spread":0.21604394129254192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1500727388","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09133955,0.015431696,0.07088184,0.07630541,0.0013928282,0.0001409294,0.000039367624,0.00010933991,0.744359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9689839,0.0019670653,0.004415823,0.01075312,0.00045838277,0.000082957165,0.000009759703,0.00004789745,0.013281124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9528727,0.02827307,0.0028614106,0.0026870803,0.009324589,0.0039811824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.961826,0.024983352,0.0049718227,0.0037935872,0.003867007,0.00055827614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033999376,0.00045088388,0.00076485815,0.0017653763,0.007110143,0.016289452,0.0018360243,0.009842311,0.0010699343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044477563,0.00061464414,0.00080907595,0.0015400772,0.043209586,0.009584574,0.0072633377,0.011832246,0.00035320534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084311605,0.000003909749,0.00042013568,0.000028672082,0.0000066462944,0.00011111724,0.0043962416,0.00016540782,0.00017359687,0.98979527,0.0009709105,0.0039196033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051141003,0.00013111452,0.0044098096,0.0018287823,0.00011627607,0.0012029582,0.0066112275,0.0042672493,0.003372599,0.7065602,0.27124852,0.0002000587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009282838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011369714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033999376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006290155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071784416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17980802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532004705","doi":"10.54648/joia2014003","title":"The Protection of Investors Legitimate Expectations and the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard under NAFTA Article","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Investor protection; International economics; Business; Economics; Law and economics; International trade; Finance","score_opus":0.01545292206955374,"score_gpt":0.2352869380189126,"score_spread":0.21983401594935886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532004705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09063399,0.0020362774,0.040284194,0.08223664,0.0017498562,0.00030674823,0.00060209335,0.0003272401,0.781823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9066734,0.00052110694,0.013887487,0.03622734,0.0010727914,0.0005864067,0.00024843472,0.00008946832,0.040693514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657534,0.008762273,0.0033189824,0.004212052,0.0125075225,0.005445838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984091,0.006439903,0.0020058886,0.002680221,0.004038882,0.00074416696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02686958,0.0005343049,0.0009935901,0.0010506726,0.006630112,0.014501194,0.002788462,0.02435003,0.0034251641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04554643,0.00082069536,0.0013130484,0.0007776527,0.016423086,0.006949779,0.004679079,0.015692024,0.0012137226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001731061,0.000018437526,0.00034444188,0.000017196026,0.0000076120104,0.000056893652,0.0012520509,0.00013436933,0.00025441998,0.9895499,0.005567117,0.0027804174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001151037,0.00016792654,0.0039299484,0.00055667496,0.000084697094,0.0004255669,0.0016626426,0.0019081953,0.002317045,0.7884534,0.20015112,0.00022765336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038481973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039531354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96151805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070182127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01964823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14210165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597733011","doi":"10.54648/joia2008054","title":"The Implementation of the New York Convention in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Enforcement; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019834840425142986,"score_gpt":0.29783089158129056,"score_spread":0.27799605115614756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597733011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12346096,0.009922779,0.0066041932,0.12302521,0.0033214681,0.0006738808,0.0008869534,0.00017170746,0.7319329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6803562,0.0049026185,0.008470205,0.026413657,0.00031193695,0.00018740392,0.00038237582,0.00010984155,0.27886578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98559326,0.0012052102,0.0004965084,0.0011190253,0.0071321237,0.0044538635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98949665,0.0014314568,0.0005249824,0.0002951517,0.006669894,0.0015817997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007227715,0.00033469347,0.00046393237,0.0014164627,0.02222275,0.013155592,0.0017253606,0.003962477,0.004315034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013680712,0.0006786838,0.00053302175,0.0017164154,0.008180869,0.0019046674,0.003055582,0.007140716,0.00031993174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006807222,0.000056074146,0.0082425745,0.00009935461,0.00004011178,0.0008195498,0.010881008,0.001251332,0.0018518558,0.8413595,0.09332831,0.042002354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004690988,0.000047972928,0.022618454,0.00019406519,0.000036236568,0.00010650986,0.0051199025,0.0010158364,0.0016276687,0.009103276,0.95985734,0.00022582914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16023327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16023327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29543382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97401035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177883749","doi":"10.54648/joia2015033","title":"The Investment Chapter of the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Economic partnership agreement; Skepticism; Investment (military); International trade; Arbitration; General partnership; European union; International economics; Economics; Political science; Business; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.022233346234412216,"score_gpt":0.2184195857855885,"score_spread":0.19618623955117628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177883749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0082642855,0.011575365,0.002403902,0.035724673,0.0034613695,0.00039287447,0.0068701305,0.000301603,0.9310059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10894477,0.009081117,0.010680128,0.029279456,0.0010167948,0.00048342103,0.0049857553,0.00029190772,0.8352366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900096,0.00031738816,0.00030059365,0.0005487489,0.0073975343,0.0014261677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606484,0.0004524601,0.0001280796,0.00023194782,0.002653509,0.0004691301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033779752,0.0006234513,0.0007543679,0.0019612582,0.0071576936,0.011308523,0.0019326785,0.0075627794,0.010065488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007937393,0.00064072665,0.0006055895,0.003189683,0.0026718075,0.0013710049,0.001717428,0.0067012194,0.0029258276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036970043,0.00003951341,0.00053642155,0.000098089826,0.000009578756,0.00018487561,0.000778951,0.0008334932,0.0004612487,0.56764257,0.40816548,0.021212842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010450053,0.0000068430586,0.0024601405,0.00015989115,0.000009149343,0.000041784228,0.0001767951,0.0002787626,0.00031095187,0.0070964126,0.9894013,0.000047510614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95170146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95732903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07148598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07148598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18734096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5186695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2197211297","doi":"10.54648/joia2009003","title":"Overcoming Immunity–Based Objections to the Recognition and Enforcement in Canada of Investor–State Awards","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State immunity; Law; Enforcement; State (computer science); Waiver; Arbitration; Legislature; Interpretation (philosophy); Customary international law; International law; Law and economics; International arbitration; Public international law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02012132194706495,"score_gpt":0.2160765564273569,"score_spread":0.19595523448029195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2197211297","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13820031,0.0018319186,0.011835197,0.17441905,0.0009459768,0.0003953148,0.00026453202,0.0002125386,0.6718952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8554077,0.0007623547,0.0046620877,0.05242126,0.00021460753,0.00013322222,0.00009176894,0.000066086905,0.08624086],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9648263,0.004162656,0.0017099164,0.003157197,0.014699887,0.011443998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97801596,0.010718072,0.0014055618,0.0013103652,0.00602291,0.0025270574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01970901,0.00041646074,0.0008131027,0.0021510157,0.027168464,0.019654632,0.005368396,0.01625579,0.005434889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046501182,0.0013713124,0.0011490389,0.0024499597,0.02108998,0.0054468797,0.009367679,0.019334342,0.000476319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042875592,0.00005187017,0.0045388644,0.000048627007,0.000027760607,0.0006484034,0.011465976,0.00089690567,0.00065828214,0.9369895,0.03300491,0.01162602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021405914,0.0001670849,0.022752754,0.00061000127,0.0003149651,0.0008024118,0.023922807,0.010663585,0.0046870783,0.18590759,0.7491745,0.0007831481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96946263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98455393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10011705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10011705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25097406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7264035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241598605","doi":"10.54648/joia2009008","title":"Principles of Treaty Interpretation in the NAFTA Arbitral Award on <i>Canadian Cattlemen</i>","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Tribunal; Treaty; Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; Context (archaeology); Convention; Law; Political science; Meaning (existential); Arbitration; Object (grammar); International law; History; Public international law; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology; Archaeology; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01797680043149414,"score_gpt":0.24689296146228193,"score_spread":0.2289161610307878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241598605","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010199753,0.0042207185,0.036820166,0.04415855,0.002258322,0.00026793353,0.0002640282,0.00012288295,0.9016876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6704908,0.0038223052,0.047591582,0.024079794,0.0022119062,0.00091001467,0.00045105396,0.0003670639,0.25007558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97115594,0.006344779,0.001064434,0.0019241129,0.014794855,0.004715977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953585,0.0018955214,0.00027789583,0.00043984898,0.0017923149,0.00023586243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018519456,0.000831382,0.0009494736,0.0027716758,0.017364725,0.020049956,0.0035801888,0.009915513,0.0051768436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023239283,0.00096681964,0.0015434038,0.0039764075,0.027522154,0.005890382,0.0045107966,0.015587576,0.0009382868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019180359,0.0000021227238,0.00003423793,0.0000054621833,0.0000013550484,0.000014880273,0.0010460838,0.00009815728,0.000024908837,0.99319553,0.004304701,0.0012705767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024216712,0.000016041173,0.0008438227,0.0002566813,0.000027833208,0.00008123214,0.0019586536,0.0012419057,0.00024659798,0.6183873,0.3768201,0.00009563885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55030334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5929866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44969666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047911275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07599003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2518351876","doi":"10.54648/joia2003039","title":"International Arbitration in Canada","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011762189419705589,"score_gpt":0.21744526677054757,"score_spread":0.205683077350842,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2518351876","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12396626,0.014392269,0.00087364,0.07161103,0.0018610008,0.00014349025,0.0025099062,0.00017951598,0.78446287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5476044,0.0050345827,0.00079196686,0.0057749194,0.00018089244,0.000042666503,0.0006478026,0.000088164976,0.43983465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944351,0.000273008,0.00014952956,0.00047527172,0.0017892183,0.0028779702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994753,0.00037083315,0.00016812353,0.00015226025,0.0029146792,0.0016410965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019009355,0.00041510124,0.00068641576,0.002943045,0.016981091,0.011568559,0.0015872258,0.0034387265,0.028376836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007207341,0.00056964287,0.00069285167,0.005679147,0.0026081942,0.0019135079,0.0027599405,0.0047664265,0.0014348754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022064659,0.00011411966,0.018985279,0.00018160723,0.000078929435,0.0010143593,0.005379416,0.001974522,0.00037125632,0.5844165,0.31757078,0.069692664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048139384,0.000024359839,0.034556624,0.0001981704,0.000056351804,0.00014177966,0.0062126685,0.0018600504,0.00032584032,0.011356844,0.94513476,0.00008436366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99723595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17296234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17296234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28903976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95924646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767915429","doi":"10.54648/joia2017040","title":"<i>Eli Lilly v. Canada</i>: A Patently Clear-Cut Dismissal on the Facts, but Opening the Door for Future Claimants on the Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Plaintiff; Arbitration; Settlor; Political science; Expropriation; Waiver; Economic Justice; Intellectual property; High Court; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.033305713577065965,"score_gpt":0.3020814067210422,"score_spread":0.26877569314397626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767915429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024845269,0.006199828,0.0023724285,0.22466369,0.0021049967,0.00016989029,0.0009948061,0.00030999468,0.7383391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26641357,0.004711716,0.0030706674,0.21722892,0.0010727376,0.00011503838,0.0006938944,0.0002103391,0.50648314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920771,0.00034164675,0.00020055033,0.000568834,0.0038162004,0.0029956915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971819,0.0008723924,0.00018427343,0.00013435051,0.00131615,0.00031098886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003185014,0.00056315685,0.00052451313,0.0015620905,0.0135379685,0.02123086,0.003329451,0.0151250865,0.008582053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008259473,0.00056666095,0.0008554795,0.0019839108,0.009113573,0.0032275333,0.0024007873,0.012726625,0.0022933064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005006729,0.000027054599,0.0018366746,0.000097010685,0.000023078981,0.0009150341,0.004313957,0.00020495849,0.001603363,0.55103767,0.4271036,0.012787454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003158851,0.000037841743,0.0051920526,0.0003837931,0.000047674897,0.0002777954,0.004636368,0.0005375501,0.0025082773,0.019847605,0.9663367,0.00016268664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91646606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9657133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08353394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061155677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08960923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44371754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124737396","doi":"10.54648/joia2011029","title":"Confidentially Speaking: Commercial Arbitration in Canadas Open Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Confidentiality; Compulsory arbitration; Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.04488880820329397,"score_gpt":0.2681220182739735,"score_spread":0.2232332100706795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124737396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1079311,0.0030214796,0.0057370695,0.07166611,0.0007931738,0.00019578935,0.0006333945,0.0001484866,0.8098734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81028557,0.0014243625,0.0022066545,0.01109737,0.0002225574,0.000049742215,0.0002373985,0.000067157205,0.17440929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893624,0.0011721845,0.00029294804,0.0007589166,0.0047494257,0.0036641508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98639214,0.003592689,0.0008295483,0.0006773804,0.005690215,0.0028180939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052038357,0.00025679285,0.00029697493,0.0011430924,0.018901223,0.012444999,0.0017014511,0.004237396,0.023773873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023280075,0.0004398272,0.00036837676,0.0024751767,0.0060817837,0.0031277924,0.005576823,0.0054744515,0.0017687492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073588795,0.00005799133,0.008049304,0.000078329336,0.00001930477,0.0016341523,0.017572217,0.00096447073,0.0005819224,0.7872687,0.14382999,0.039870054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059477275,0.00002801802,0.013122732,0.00023849067,0.000037607595,0.00054137514,0.017752692,0.0035888162,0.00083557336,0.052839335,0.91082263,0.00013327687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94409597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9647979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9569007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043099273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12000504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31270856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183268339","doi":"10.54648/joia2021026","title":"<i>Global Telecom Holding v. Canada</i>: Interpreting and Applying Reservations and Carve-Outs in Investment Treaties","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Interpretation (philosophy); Investment (military); Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; Bilateral investment treaty; Dissenting opinion; Liberalization; Arbitration; International trade; Law; State (computer science); Reservation; Law and economics; Political science; Business; International law; Foreign direct investment; Economics; International investment; Politics; Public international law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01240124894065661,"score_gpt":0.22704650192088313,"score_spread":0.21464525298022652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183268339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037344046,0.0029661579,0.0035020397,0.19826964,0.0020483986,0.00019967288,0.0010615287,0.00017682547,0.7544317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44361854,0.0025011671,0.0038905297,0.31113857,0.00089768606,0.00020272685,0.00042190577,0.00020254547,0.2371263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99103206,0.0006843117,0.00028019914,0.0007729084,0.0037868796,0.0034435682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970342,0.0012264553,0.00023143188,0.0001566169,0.0010673507,0.0002839806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053622276,0.00063272513,0.0005089532,0.0014868199,0.015493935,0.013969044,0.0035489087,0.015731527,0.0045763096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010424456,0.0005415094,0.001110223,0.0032535673,0.012219103,0.002993226,0.0026121954,0.013603434,0.00087709754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027693912,0.000013375435,0.0016571633,0.00006114118,0.000011865922,0.0008490783,0.008464644,0.00040588964,0.0005451871,0.74255246,0.23947035,0.005941116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040630708,0.000037373156,0.007913351,0.00041087938,0.000087195614,0.0005048678,0.013521927,0.0015525233,0.001761132,0.059246726,0.9146848,0.00023855842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92900866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9691366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07099134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057184204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062222436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4149024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231799543","doi":"10.54648/joia2019035","title":"Sociology of Commercial Arbitration: Tools for the New Times","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Formality; Mediation; Relevance (law); Perspective (graphical); Typology; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Compulsory arbitration; Flexibility (engineering); Dispute resolution; Law and economics; Alternative dispute resolution; Work (physics); Political science; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Economics; Management; Engineering","score_opus":0.025344668182075834,"score_gpt":0.2665204084381106,"score_spread":0.24117574025603475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231799543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02177488,0.087290935,0.107639715,0.24940337,0.003331423,0.00008611003,0.000110182526,0.00017491051,0.53018844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9230523,0.018345613,0.019222941,0.007895089,0.0042063426,0.00025501702,0.000060370807,0.0001413901,0.026820965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948144,0.0037164346,0.00015378682,0.00041042684,0.0006130147,0.00029192684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98768497,0.009124957,0.000657256,0.0013066274,0.00057485653,0.0006513953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009531912,0.0005889508,0.0007575773,0.0037958256,0.005500524,0.013199467,0.0018220622,0.005261359,0.006414254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010477206,0.000340032,0.0005601667,0.0028019594,0.0716813,0.023931418,0.006960097,0.0066806357,0.0007152989],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017265095,0.0000022222841,0.00004363714,0.000012940255,7.426928e-7,0.000012153972,0.0015223323,0.00005916573,0.000009220208,0.99616075,0.0008588403,0.0013161785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004364029,0.0000052051923,0.000106495885,0.0000871549,0.0000015506648,0.000051761912,0.002920224,0.0005123061,0.000021383945,0.92485464,0.071428955,0.0000060790067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027396388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002016574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013199467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073954533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032418945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05365795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246964126","doi":"10.54648/joia2021006","title":"<i>Rand Investments v. Republic of Serbia</i>: Transparency and the Limits of Consent","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Dissenting opinion; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Treaty; Tribunal; Duty; Bilateral investment treaty; Respondent; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Foreign direct investment; International investment","score_opus":0.03178328290124937,"score_gpt":0.25732058689674747,"score_spread":0.2255373039954981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246964126","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08612686,0.0071154744,0.0040707914,0.14786427,0.0022157335,0.00029659685,0.00056805136,0.0002261403,0.75151604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65685534,0.0030004345,0.0037422555,0.1783563,0.0005648256,0.0002497726,0.00024751024,0.00010157847,0.15688191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99309534,0.0018867115,0.0005757859,0.001008675,0.0016522458,0.0017812595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969689,0.0016818754,0.0004128527,0.0002568198,0.00053275924,0.00014678872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006448127,0.0006174204,0.0005405353,0.00087898166,0.008698904,0.013050969,0.001977058,0.015658084,0.004059137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009910136,0.00075294153,0.0007932043,0.001049821,0.0074516134,0.0029430871,0.0026909627,0.013750848,0.0014393732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053648906,0.00001791599,0.0016070753,0.00009363891,0.000014981623,0.0016218716,0.01280132,0.00023869768,0.0010479718,0.88347405,0.092010416,0.0070184125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029038345,0.00009257491,0.00851148,0.0009092546,0.000051389474,0.001958618,0.014313364,0.0007004792,0.004011227,0.03533339,0.9338718,0.00021739355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10079095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14853774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10079095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007900812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075718965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20040858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251246921","doi":"10.54648/joia2019037","title":"The New NAFTA: Scaled-Back Arbitration in the USMCA","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Free trade agreement; Investor-state dispute settlement; Political science; State (computer science); International trade; Settlement (finance); Investment (military); International investment; Business; Law; Foreign direct investment; Free trade; Finance","score_opus":0.012035549707225555,"score_gpt":0.23527266658850432,"score_spread":0.22323711688127876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251246921","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14975643,0.014414843,0.011216163,0.06684604,0.0028103117,0.00035817022,0.0012646724,0.00040857756,0.7529247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8566775,0.004952515,0.015598063,0.020294577,0.0005562196,0.0003378161,0.00085292786,0.00012591007,0.10060437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930535,0.0013178817,0.00037013515,0.00073451374,0.0035709303,0.0009529825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954868,0.0014999866,0.00031948154,0.00032477794,0.0021583652,0.0002105133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008522856,0.00025793214,0.0003797265,0.001524332,0.0067448877,0.009826316,0.0011831953,0.0049124677,0.0050986544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014904724,0.0003755576,0.0005291016,0.0016605582,0.0033620335,0.0030673994,0.0026084562,0.0042376877,0.00057913625],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006796066,0.000035847537,0.004987322,0.00008748286,0.000018308432,0.0006438385,0.0048978133,0.00062010885,0.00091560633,0.8752661,0.07448035,0.03797923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042970038,0.00003583197,0.005634846,0.00041219048,0.000045253582,0.00025880337,0.0017308554,0.0014027478,0.00088035996,0.028491868,0.9610044,0.000059802496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40245456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48648134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40245456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017433962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02540859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.800224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385787979","doi":"10.54648/joia2023017","title":"International Arbitration Agreements in Canada Post-Uber","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Enforcement; Unconscionability; Supreme court; Class action; International arbitration; Compulsory arbitration; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.013695348793147528,"score_gpt":0.23090920438414805,"score_spread":0.21721385559100054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385787979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24057995,0.0035999217,0.0035843945,0.034666862,0.0006755945,0.00036645224,0.0005824789,0.00024200001,0.7157023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80194527,0.0019345235,0.002593565,0.021863509,0.00014870096,0.00012819776,0.0003302849,0.00008628027,0.17096977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9764837,0.0010749234,0.000567196,0.0017413014,0.010502188,0.009630767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992462,0.001884585,0.00050558214,0.0004894194,0.003762103,0.00089630374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007366331,0.0005674979,0.0007076731,0.002384177,0.027131574,0.012004918,0.0029622668,0.0075544594,0.0052504567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019881234,0.0008212008,0.0012045846,0.0040116324,0.008231643,0.002529068,0.006096493,0.012264462,0.00038587133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007479751,0.00010428073,0.007598528,0.00010600507,0.00006825865,0.00291339,0.017566888,0.001749752,0.0011105788,0.8961162,0.040361043,0.032230366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001339098,0.00012233321,0.051684882,0.00042143863,0.00028904687,0.000927754,0.020704988,0.006320048,0.005460118,0.050693233,0.86263233,0.0006098993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13958865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13958865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16582724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395468905","doi":"10.54648/joia2024008","title":"Article: The FET Standard between Treaty Reform and ISDS Practice: An Analysis of the Modernized ECT","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"Taxation and Legal Issues","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.016146495344631584,"score_gpt":0.3018537645403963,"score_spread":0.2857072691957647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395468905","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06931769,0.005066852,0.03617063,0.06545305,0.0016183353,0.00018578678,0.00017055697,0.000105227526,0.82191193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89861816,0.0024414381,0.010379274,0.013924985,0.002052229,0.00022952355,0.0001152866,0.00009097596,0.07214793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899038,0.0032448482,0.0004387858,0.00069905416,0.004853585,0.00086002145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945622,0.0030091102,0.0008739651,0.00055873924,0.00086497306,0.00013107152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068074963,0.00030887354,0.0004374134,0.0015413021,0.0041972385,0.009370176,0.0017139089,0.006653046,0.007832376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015013218,0.00030103765,0.0010583098,0.0023263753,0.015100593,0.007985478,0.0043239635,0.009727805,0.00053503213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056759836,0.00001010326,0.000081176986,0.000007750341,0.0000018904948,0.00003383289,0.00039431028,0.00028899327,0.000046624027,0.9954755,0.0020405198,0.0016137277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048154718,0.000081400816,0.002927902,0.00033977747,0.000025987161,0.00021709783,0.0015198346,0.003918429,0.0009775014,0.7147858,0.27509323,0.00006488243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006903518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071177916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0107867345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0107867345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005970748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07826352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407062961","doi":"10.54648/joia2025008","title":"Immunities and States’ Alter Egos","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"Economic and Social Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.012062749494458997,"score_gpt":0.3255368143870856,"score_spread":0.3134740648926266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407062961","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20574221,0.000959431,0.0063427887,0.020071043,0.00020388306,0.000031897085,0.000050608312,0.00002732346,0.76657087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98786795,0.00022163101,0.00026981017,0.0012542531,0.000045173827,0.000010195094,0.0000104987175,0.000004663569,0.010315778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976665,0.0007306845,0.00009896239,0.0002747671,0.00040911124,0.00082006096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781835,0.0007260621,0.00045117963,0.00028706386,0.0003828754,0.0003344359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024052178,0.00014980212,0.00020983587,0.001074837,0.0040103216,0.004985147,0.00042370436,0.002181432,0.0074532465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004956835,0.0001677978,0.00035702324,0.0006330313,0.017814491,0.0033320768,0.0052492665,0.003314344,0.00039108712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003896551,0.000004250507,0.00048029333,0.0000027078381,0.0000016447286,0.000032682223,0.0010749862,0.000066130684,0.000039125163,0.99645185,0.00041851998,0.0014239025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016182179,0.000056929443,0.0064563467,0.00014596652,0.000023677607,0.00034848368,0.007559079,0.00068622956,0.00052449247,0.8571346,0.12701504,0.00003290252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009154108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010915375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009154108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031535942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002510853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024933577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W910613057","doi":"10.54648/joia2012037","title":"Water-Related International Investment Disputes: A Fresh Look at <i>Bayview Irrigation District v. United Mexican States</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fresh water; Agriculture; Investment (military); International waters; International investment; International trade; Water trading; Water resources; Irrigation; Water supply; Business; Law; Political science; Foreign direct investment; Water conservation; Geography; Water resource management; Environmental science; Environmental engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.014424211541633116,"score_gpt":0.23365120567714956,"score_spread":0.21922699413551644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W910613057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09389066,0.031484623,0.0012976908,0.33578622,0.00079723424,0.00011055831,0.0003495985,0.0000278752,0.5362556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835937,0.023352856,0.0013077686,0.07421758,0.0014055594,0.00016552261,0.00028512703,0.000034605968,0.06329391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982609,0.00055423845,0.000045846802,0.00013125093,0.00040401964,0.0006037353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987457,0.00072989933,0.00019324772,0.000038056103,0.0001954114,0.000097709926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020327875,0.0003226939,0.00038644488,0.0020387287,0.009389569,0.01192362,0.0014959702,0.007488615,0.0051867617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003260484,0.00024136416,0.0007317631,0.0037715293,0.005819267,0.0064781215,0.0026955828,0.0062493267,0.00020032075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023041013,0.00007001329,0.004560903,0.00012900081,0.000016630438,0.0011307413,0.015589798,0.0002863381,0.0002640216,0.88294345,0.08473794,0.010248204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039175717,0.000055164746,0.03507817,0.00076215866,0.00007388191,0.0006309768,0.070486784,0.0015091297,0.00064487394,0.08583552,0.8047979,0.00008632606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18425965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26469916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18425965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013676685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056156814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3663743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}