{"meta":{"query_hash":"84b2b51dc2bd","filters":{"venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/84b2b51dc2bd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+International+Dispute+Settlement"},"results":[{"id":"W2103503951","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idt028","title":"Enforcing Judgments of International Courts in National Courts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Thompson Rivers University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013197032341612498,"score_gpt":0.2511852123231272,"score_spread":0.2379881799815147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103503951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33182672,0.00008622579,0.009795728,0.021314833,0.013442552,0.00049383455,0.0001236448,0.000044161727,0.6228723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986601,0.000039425875,0.0011637992,0.009518208,0.0021183034,0.0000075004077,0.00015539062,0.000019468762,0.00037690095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965554,0.000021903092,0.0012327144,0.0001892077,0.0018074847,0.00019330374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99695915,0.00007844875,0.0013047161,0.00009738385,0.0015324812,0.00002783502],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012720515,0.00019051279,0.0002630226,0.000923549,0.000048204594,0.00016697036,0.0006845062,0.000057420653,0.0013300873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000368125,0.00017458416,0.00019419049,0.00014619183,0.000056478377,0.0016130136,0.00015546569,0.00020606605,0.000068627494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002570856,0.0005654037,0.05079605,0.000050417417,0.0003540916,0.000018088813,0.000113492395,0.0040770457,0.0031496775,0.90625644,0.03297967,0.0013825229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048921774,0.00010116556,0.08862633,0.0004950738,0.000052532054,0.0000374623,0.00016691393,0.055773653,0.002105617,0.034538537,0.81278735,0.0004231578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006365037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038554263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87171793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031297636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008070266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117467808","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idq020","title":"The Interplay of International Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: the Softwood Lumber Controversy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Settlement (finance); Dispute resolution; International arbitration; Political science; Law; Softwood; Alternative dispute resolution; Investor-state dispute settlement; Law and economics; Economics; International investment; Engineering; Foreign direct investment","score_opus":0.012257921127740334,"score_gpt":0.23587639548461534,"score_spread":0.223618474356875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117467808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051032577,0.00064035156,0.13958235,0.08704865,0.047784857,0.0016482602,0.0003447036,0.00012582743,0.67179245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827476,0.00020675975,0.0016191178,0.011669763,0.0022341562,0.000022155857,0.000081005644,0.000029695935,0.0013897412],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972744,0.00003792725,0.0010789112,0.00017554869,0.0012100704,0.00022311788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968091,0.00012566347,0.001539952,0.00020782449,0.0012916236,0.000025792187],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001157744,0.00020271084,0.00019792272,0.0002334093,0.00021473241,0.00027134657,0.0012986285,0.000051645995,0.0012214532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028060086,0.0001208535,0.0003255757,0.00014780952,0.00015851355,0.0012895046,0.00028529728,0.0002628358,0.00008482003],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041677963,0.00027784434,0.0019119491,0.000010389593,0.00069329777,0.000011377773,0.00021246827,0.000079241894,0.00086897827,0.9523953,0.0420875,0.0010348558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025150203,0.00014952365,0.026781341,0.00020806366,0.000184677,0.00005761108,0.0010483998,0.012495891,0.0018075211,0.0574583,0.89698076,0.00031289554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001270701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013292587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.931715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001728153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057851987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160787068","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idr016","title":"Satisfaction as a Form of Reparation for Moral Damages Suffered by Investors and Respondent States in Investor-State Arbitration Disputes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Arbitration; Tribunal; Law; Context (archaeology); Compensation (psychology); Redress; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01695369296199279,"score_gpt":0.2670558154122434,"score_spread":0.2501021224502506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160787068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916175,0.00014318079,0.0015997931,0.0037454416,0.0009411952,0.0003550756,0.000068677706,0.000010282545,0.0015188283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99350774,0.00010905481,0.0009749534,0.0044445144,0.00046629363,0.00002559837,0.00028455025,0.000016097363,0.00017119411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982721,0.000023698944,0.00084442226,0.00013348786,0.0005462266,0.00018005923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998411,0.000076174874,0.00095215713,0.000072737996,0.00045188496,0.00003605099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007888386,0.00015731853,0.00020396283,0.00047335628,0.00005618647,0.00013425367,0.00014210284,0.000043444492,0.000089673435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001843112,0.00013924066,0.00009139549,0.00013169809,0.000056069228,0.0034946727,0.000048447208,0.000111369394,0.000005624472],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011988946,0.00061869476,0.37589312,0.00017684777,0.00030039565,0.0000034826687,0.0013637067,0.00040736227,0.025496522,0.5634261,0.02979403,0.0013208856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005334109,0.00043569555,0.74929595,0.0003497953,0.00013332312,0.000028177648,0.0011874547,0.018722793,0.014370716,0.08592692,0.12362516,0.0005898981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025710775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018665195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47749913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018975853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004075787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5678069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273594481","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idv037","title":"Diplomats Want Treaties: Diplomatic Agendas and Perks in the Investment Regime","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University College London; International Development Research Centre; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Treaty; Negotiation; Diplomacy; Economic diplomacy; Investment (military); Work (physics); Political science; International trade; Foreign direct investment; Law and economics; Economics; International economics; Political economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.015763038619806803,"score_gpt":0.24436004933311378,"score_spread":0.228597010713307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273594481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7111346,0.00029609434,0.0015219981,0.1375081,0.0020048667,0.0006007827,0.000045591798,0.000033450375,0.1468545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695456,0.0001339531,0.00031284508,0.02850479,0.00094399904,0.000018085246,0.000017851515,0.000013955551,0.0005089244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828655,0.00002924895,0.0006420024,0.00014064593,0.00074375817,0.00015777479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990211,0.00009858335,0.0005212334,0.00011764017,0.0002223606,0.000019066532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060728844,0.0001553105,0.00016316825,0.00032260324,0.00006902447,0.00023364065,0.00041536218,0.000029291688,0.00044308315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012062552,0.00007932976,0.00010103793,0.0001095463,0.000075057,0.0011572395,0.000093103015,0.00009670647,0.000062422594],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010741746,0.0003817245,0.013424334,0.000039814484,0.00020807123,0.000081428996,0.00076338486,0.000017743996,0.0015400163,0.94999725,0.031159535,0.002279288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004519737,0.00017548073,0.17859368,0.0007759445,0.000107625034,0.00013464711,0.0016300074,0.0016690919,0.00038818354,0.095238484,0.7163569,0.0004102473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000028896126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000033136585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85475874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013919601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027502429,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48514497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519950315","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idw022","title":"TPP, CETA and TTIP Between Innovation and Consolidation—Resolving Investor–State Disputes under Mega-regionals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; International trade; Investor-state dispute settlement; Arbitration; Consolidation (business); Negotiation; General partnership; State (computer science); Business; Political science; European union; International economics; Foreign direct investment; International investment; Economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.02628151520386572,"score_gpt":0.25727684029328396,"score_spread":0.23099532508941822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519950315","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90515584,0.00018217745,0.014311667,0.06749376,0.0012869517,0.00026439814,0.000089636196,0.000036470934,0.011179125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9829668,0.00014215158,0.00083326624,0.013852428,0.0014674041,0.0000063550615,0.00006962957,0.000020102341,0.0006419079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812317,0.00002080483,0.00081577786,0.00020480006,0.000667002,0.00016845237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997939,0.00015207042,0.00088750425,0.00008738026,0.00089964,0.000034396682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062932394,0.00018408574,0.00020669762,0.0006044064,0.0001199863,0.00034141153,0.00023404589,0.000042669937,0.0003319388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023065132,0.00012921049,0.000062062194,0.00018910888,0.00013380787,0.0022358296,0.00016096066,0.00011020156,0.00002617191],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063583924,0.00008015662,0.07440473,0.000032273045,0.00034108196,0.00000787999,0.00006041892,0.000020433074,0.0061332546,0.899497,0.0148829855,0.004476255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033976405,0.00008619439,0.45400462,0.00053238164,0.0001162144,0.00004856369,0.00015549907,0.00078109105,0.0018893415,0.13316919,0.40533698,0.0004822682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020480227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015455178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76632774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010958693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047036345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52690506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727865175","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idx016","title":"Rebalancing European Human Rights: Has the Brighton Declaration Engendered a New Deal on Human Rights in Europe?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Margin of appreciation; Declaration; Human rights; Political science; Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; European union; Business","score_opus":0.0982215573856167,"score_gpt":0.3644392547754735,"score_spread":0.2662176973898568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727865175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20196722,0.00005386846,0.00024209605,0.019523472,0.0019595723,0.00025068017,0.000030854568,0.000021303824,0.7759509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886272,0.000029039576,0.00018647811,0.0004554014,0.002314036,0.0000014581432,0.000019651552,0.000013233524,0.008353488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972979,0.00042031417,0.00072471227,0.00021058111,0.0011064388,0.00024004627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813676,0.00008548165,0.0009124763,0.00023579634,0.0005104677,0.000119044984],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017162868,0.00016817958,0.00018778072,0.00017075462,0.002737519,0.00071909325,0.0013952082,0.000030554915,0.00034626652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015523405,0.00011229691,0.00013608953,0.000068889894,0.00022346576,0.00054770574,0.00015508391,0.00033733327,0.000096677664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085572545,0.00024685788,0.003767412,0.0000034506884,0.0002676155,0.00020993524,0.00543397,0.00008772608,0.0006486442,0.90547043,0.082730025,0.0010483376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009514162,0.00016525034,0.13555698,0.00015683418,0.000017987277,0.000007019562,0.00008627265,0.000013527728,0.00024154242,0.004582281,0.8580914,0.00012949792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023532715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021637376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90088814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000370765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007774281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963543540","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idz013","title":"Transnational Public Policy as an International Practice in Investment Arbitration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Obligation; Redress; Doctrine; Normative; Arbitration; International investment; International arbitration; Law and economics; International law; Legal doctrine; Political science; Law; Public policy; Economics; Business; Foreign direct investment","score_opus":0.014292211681031945,"score_gpt":0.2842589343851332,"score_spread":0.26996672270410127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963543540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24908996,0.000032093085,0.00070675527,0.17253686,0.0054839104,0.00052850595,0.00004403744,0.000042454856,0.5715354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90664184,0.000047715315,0.0015928429,0.08825036,0.002456679,0.000018070423,0.00046536923,0.000027837372,0.0004992825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965788,0.00004608334,0.0011056402,0.0002974735,0.0017124609,0.00025950998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99718726,0.0000848423,0.0009983628,0.00017887827,0.001495043,0.00005560701],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010790158,0.00023526263,0.00022497958,0.001473605,0.00005939018,0.00063885294,0.000854594,0.000079199,0.002968516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004778281,0.0002193546,0.00017780412,0.00038974558,0.00004568812,0.009081065,0.00009809891,0.00031381182,0.0002830629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021923531,0.00085375016,0.008229558,0.000011588046,0.00018424304,0.000030367024,0.00012454657,0.0006930703,0.0010404295,0.98676646,0.0012992289,0.0005475156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031080942,0.00015211625,0.030609243,0.000050716822,0.000029095283,0.00009235462,0.00048471242,0.00899144,0.00023113705,0.037598513,0.918339,0.0003135481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000111990616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000917163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94916797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059023756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034379316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094429225","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idaa016","title":"Frivolous and Abuse of Process Claims in Investor–State Arbitration: Can Rules on Cost Allocation Become Solution?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Process (computing); Ex-ante; State (computer science); Law and economics; Business; Ex parte; Deterrence theory; Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.020337165585521625,"score_gpt":0.25413140314036325,"score_spread":0.23379423755484163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094429225","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95850563,0.000043801745,0.0008413498,0.030596413,0.0006700049,0.00032528557,0.000055758177,0.000015712994,0.008946043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97668785,0.000060559298,0.00030771774,0.022186218,0.0005907339,0.000011006467,0.00011170824,0.0000126873765,0.00003149161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829787,0.00001611914,0.0007613961,0.00016390544,0.00063568715,0.00012499887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856466,0.00002970145,0.00074744143,0.00006116381,0.0005636751,0.000033385884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026242813,0.00014025299,0.00019157401,0.00031820888,0.000047238023,0.000119751065,0.00026381557,0.00003453807,0.00009687226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007112009,0.00012944608,0.000070331116,0.00016294493,0.000058481717,0.0008644654,0.00003747576,0.00017514786,0.000019689782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012133936,0.0017496983,0.05280506,0.0004543327,0.00056184875,0.00006733935,0.00428287,0.011510174,0.0063734045,0.9020372,0.015437557,0.003507123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015378121,0.0011428101,0.44154966,0.001720184,0.00024395944,0.00007200301,0.0028105667,0.23592284,0.010940298,0.08971367,0.19884524,0.001660662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058252386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016056096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8123235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011501519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006216865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52786577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121516341","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idv031","title":"Investment Treaties and the Internal Vetting of Regulatory Proposals: A Case Study from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Investment (military); Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.010201609385001477,"score_gpt":0.22220159089821898,"score_spread":0.2119999815132175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121516341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834112,0.00010231737,0.0002049566,0.00831799,0.0010712356,0.00026321513,0.000041888437,0.0000056779954,0.006581537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933022,0.000015009381,0.00016832395,0.0054436303,0.00082166254,0.000009699786,0.0000054431644,0.00001037983,0.0002236479],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813026,0.00004278765,0.00079890975,0.00013353699,0.0007876184,0.000106887106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822456,0.00016351341,0.0009512289,0.0001166702,0.0005232653,0.000020776835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061511074,0.00014182019,0.00021703602,0.00014861708,0.00007915792,0.00011230949,0.00029925464,0.000017329594,0.00028475898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015920492,0.00007251703,0.00008859381,0.00005930884,0.00012356043,0.00064996484,0.00015485573,0.00008472813,0.0000029955816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020681636,0.0014176404,0.2731961,0.00008366844,0.0042694886,0.0020205115,0.0024616048,0.000091965,0.0029225592,0.6495691,0.049822222,0.012076967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.07582424,0.0011170852,0.37347373,0.0030936045,0.0019099343,0.0026487121,0.051603332,0.010549292,0.008599064,0.07755149,0.39161953,0.0020099888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10162948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046695527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5720176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018964993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012455124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9706998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209117114","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idab024","title":"Procedural Cross-Fertilization in International Commercial and Investment Arbitration: A Functional Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Investment (military); Human fertilization; Business; Economics; International economics; Political science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.022154284359933895,"score_gpt":0.2593736863617492,"score_spread":0.2372194020018153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209117114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5732127,0.00034407855,0.01250554,0.036614448,0.009530416,0.0005761389,0.0000776968,0.00006226413,0.36707672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93839186,0.00007050386,0.0026382587,0.05442631,0.0029649069,0.00002676894,0.00077364186,0.000024415825,0.0006833368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99765867,0.0000236084,0.00091930083,0.00026368178,0.0009577343,0.00017703323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980129,0.000031516105,0.00057491165,0.00009606316,0.0012505377,0.000034075958],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046848078,0.00019388164,0.00020606632,0.0004535099,0.0000937203,0.00057287776,0.0002801604,0.00006639388,0.00092860294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021737302,0.00018125227,0.00012674436,0.00025172374,0.00007624237,0.00213806,0.00016945758,0.00023412249,0.000026243488],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040004792,0.001066805,0.09827971,0.000069000555,0.00028397405,0.0000734475,0.00019711802,0.0022570647,0.0016330472,0.8799713,0.015164635,0.0006038152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056986744,0.000057923735,0.6153406,0.00019836165,0.00006477206,0.00026954018,0.0005702846,0.040113956,0.00089514145,0.023171294,0.31312978,0.0004896442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023701492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076728254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027161054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001407115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214478666","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idab028","title":"State Responsibility for the Conduct of Rebels in Situations of Unsuccessful Civil Wars: A Critical Analysis of the <i>Cengiz v Libya</i> Case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; State responsibility; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Spanish Civil War; Law; Political science; Arbitration; Insurgency; Government (linguistics); Commission; Embodied cognition; Law and economics; Sociology; International law; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030866138563965057,"score_gpt":0.3133803678165132,"score_spread":0.2825142292525481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214478666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95302737,0.00022255428,0.008583621,0.030364592,0.0014296029,0.00042964768,0.00074457924,0.000004753194,0.00519328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968906,0.000032380856,0.0006222188,0.0021548097,0.00013342401,0.000007705276,0.000040185616,0.000006666893,0.00011200879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978951,0.00006096971,0.0011522209,0.0001277508,0.0006575211,0.000106399086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959741,0.0006453968,0.00093658513,0.00019854624,0.0022332114,0.000012146824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011941056,0.00010025545,0.00027720619,0.0003565868,0.00005918648,0.00005577019,0.00037312813,0.000026853304,0.00043508087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012795574,0.000064165375,0.0004012136,0.0006758708,0.00013452902,0.0005147985,0.00010577125,0.00012498305,7.5945417e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081909436,0.0022104727,0.0500014,0.00033200305,0.0046682097,0.000110726694,0.0010703574,0.022878941,0.018875787,0.89027464,0.0077776965,0.0009806738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009337356,0.0003201329,0.44363177,0.0014270305,0.006178372,0.00022342928,0.0064989105,0.21912394,0.09432049,0.09894675,0.119145945,0.0008458565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001545299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016041399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7913279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000771035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001518244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47638303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285388102","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idac016","title":"Reconsidering International Compensation in Historical Context","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); International law; Law; Political science; International arbitration; Collateral; Work (physics); Law and economics; Arbitration; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.04086850735974812,"score_gpt":0.24026352433192055,"score_spread":0.19939501697217243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285388102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.523585,0.00033202508,0.0036826606,0.14249557,0.045394678,0.0006981496,0.00008834215,0.000088025234,0.28363553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978049,0.000018750314,0.00046211993,0.01893993,0.0015492123,0.000020223477,0.00011753636,0.000016133921,0.00082713144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977718,0.000025713369,0.000876571,0.0001603476,0.0010214049,0.00014417598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986575,0.00004439031,0.0007924978,0.00008098494,0.00040728485,0.000017311826],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007460231,0.00012794245,0.00017678135,0.0007639126,0.00010737372,0.00015558455,0.00055223895,0.000021520027,0.0048694825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012073711,0.00012969109,0.00014996596,0.00017963884,0.000018193057,0.0010968063,0.00024786522,0.00029963054,0.00005037576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079457316,0.0015824042,0.07953146,0.000030005434,0.0004522654,0.00031698454,0.00072337466,0.010802881,0.0026993246,0.68183607,0.21276444,0.0084662335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015465812,0.000040208775,0.009616718,0.000030106807,0.000013248121,0.000059948507,0.0006909798,0.008817311,0.00008704301,0.0043668104,0.9745778,0.0001532375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009291077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009624835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76181334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015548136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054654265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383652676","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idad017","title":"A tale of policy carve-outs and general exceptions: <i>Eco Oro v Colombia</i> as a case study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Tribunal; Scope (computer science); Duty; Political science; State (computer science); Free trade agreement; Law and economics; Law; Investment (military); Business; Free trade; Economics; International trade; Politics","score_opus":0.016746252290846145,"score_gpt":0.29200211362605927,"score_spread":0.2752558613352131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383652676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97388214,0.000024613317,0.00008401606,0.0048411824,0.0008797541,0.00026118688,0.00004692012,0.00002208159,0.019958118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99132645,0.000038020007,0.00014523564,0.00514411,0.0015273627,0.000015342237,0.00005708406,0.000015986992,0.0017304193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827635,0.000020700048,0.00071161264,0.00015283968,0.00068528403,0.00015320066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853706,0.00004499557,0.0006351953,0.00009574499,0.0006566296,0.000030369454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005057335,0.00014261705,0.00020044751,0.0007176015,0.00009991281,0.00018790888,0.0002379113,0.000030122577,0.000567951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012533477,0.00012445035,0.00012363704,0.00034551998,0.00005448459,0.0008821805,0.00018503032,0.000114130795,0.000106277876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041895726,0.0028412624,0.10596596,0.00016297928,0.0017962708,0.0040827673,0.0023771054,0.0013367849,0.005203463,0.73130614,0.1390816,0.0054267067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017466001,0.001611976,0.24251401,0.0005184505,0.0006235988,0.004615741,0.023971587,0.020822534,0.0015769843,0.030554637,0.65435386,0.0013706094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010174852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024255375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7007515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000107387124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008255206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6218665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391175956","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idad032","title":"The legitimation of international adjudication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond","keywords":"Legitimation; Adjudication; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012101558634873095,"score_gpt":0.3317657695548968,"score_spread":0.3196642109200237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391175956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09732673,0.0042795823,0.092550024,0.33582658,0.06941654,0.0010196386,0.0006179754,0.00013990034,0.39882302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916333,0.0022837105,0.0008638066,0.00016204764,0.0019348479,0.0000074984655,0.000063333624,0.000009751052,0.0030417377],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976542,0.000087431974,0.00067424605,0.00010030741,0.0013617564,0.00012205653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808013,0.00028140002,0.00047112152,0.00007544763,0.0010413104,0.000050590497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015621115,0.00007807978,0.000093409566,0.0002076543,0.00017061499,0.00024890175,0.00060320395,0.000043832522,0.00042447692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035124723,0.000057321606,0.00017453676,0.00014131244,0.00011859673,0.00067903724,0.00004368595,0.00014658726,0.000033048622],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005397132,0.000073576506,0.0014959065,0.000008703984,0.00032177262,0.000007153797,0.0015955673,0.00020532377,0.0006958878,0.93714386,0.024003536,0.03439471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023240437,0.000050245235,0.011311145,0.00017631502,0.000029339104,0.000011345464,0.00078817457,0.0020202957,0.000932292,0.010501401,0.9738713,0.00007574887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010809386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019123437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9498678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040324003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002666533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46477246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392286503","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idae005","title":"Banning oil and gas activities under international investment law: a problem of indeterminacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Investment (military); Law; International investment; Political science; Fossil fuel; International law; Philosophy; Economics; Engineering; Foreign direct investment; Epistemology; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.013608027478423044,"score_gpt":0.2526006323770834,"score_spread":0.23899260489866037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392286503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14826733,0.0007539419,0.0025344768,0.037314154,0.0059114113,0.00017815086,0.000109561886,0.00007831772,0.80485266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96475446,0.00033049972,0.0025280528,0.02783096,0.002523589,0.000017469032,0.00010869947,0.000037840466,0.0018683977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980767,0.000013228886,0.0007315883,0.00018663754,0.00084446144,0.000147386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989423,0.00005996313,0.0005056929,0.00007612825,0.0003897001,0.000026221247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044102164,0.0001805928,0.00019681026,0.00052913814,0.000060061717,0.00048736835,0.00034504983,0.00004440681,0.00055244984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025074347,0.0001505661,0.00014687766,0.0001163699,0.0001102335,0.0021220406,0.00018548715,0.00019495467,0.0000209138],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077822595,0.0001611644,0.00038654264,0.00013508415,0.0005024307,0.000038125338,0.00018530258,0.0002805561,0.0030140448,0.98305464,0.0069899764,0.0051743174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00130067,0.000100149904,0.0013774562,0.0011137011,0.00012926405,0.00011669277,0.00075437356,0.01303107,0.002022667,0.05229944,0.92743176,0.00032274597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007187995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030746753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9307552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017096344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006334775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6139908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402548180","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idae018","title":"Arbitration in cross-border data protection disputes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0320758617540472,"score_gpt":0.3671973468882235,"score_spread":0.3351214851341763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402548180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2518821,0.0035415466,0.22678135,0.12336302,0.045963466,0.0018733011,0.0006382453,0.00045451664,0.34550244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937746,0.00014402012,0.0004170658,0.0010834272,0.003255324,0.000013640153,0.00028973565,0.000023228216,0.0009989863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984645,0.000009955142,0.00060306635,0.0002120954,0.00055802497,0.00015232779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992593,0.000024441539,0.00025319547,0.00017732862,0.00026995098,0.000015767544],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006366187,0.00012261435,0.00012838579,0.000577739,0.0000599538,0.00086116226,0.00040543612,0.00004499202,0.0011210255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000121330886,0.00010310987,0.00009321552,0.00037303456,0.000030679563,0.0033510053,0.00017986352,0.0002560901,0.00014404293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042996326,0.0017626581,0.029884748,0.00066237286,0.0010430274,0.00036465688,0.00022101823,0.007200351,0.0050988668,0.57673776,0.13768195,0.23891264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041538905,0.000014633577,0.039396763,0.0002074201,0.000030043268,0.00003118215,0.00008134911,0.0668271,0.00003001366,0.0013212032,0.8915297,0.0001152243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008479507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000184018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7538477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017048747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069342015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409148924","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idaf017","title":"<i>Deripaska v Montenegro</i>: the alpha and omega of State succession to BITs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Montenegro; Omega; Ecological succession; Alpha (finance); State (computer science); Mathematics; Philosophy; History; Biology; Ethnology; Botany; Statistics; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.009722941722857389,"score_gpt":0.3239730956249972,"score_spread":0.31425015390213984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409148924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.864077,0.0005867251,0.0045419764,0.10966933,0.002591467,0.0002437399,0.00006145029,0.000007948972,0.0182204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532366,0.0008860759,0.00025024996,0.00096093863,0.00017695736,0.0000026809232,0.00000196347,0.0000030039118,0.002394454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988568,0.000062025945,0.00038252625,0.00007427835,0.000522855,0.00010155203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991421,0.000088247805,0.00024952085,0.000060226732,0.0003953946,0.00006451866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007781877,0.000058867743,0.00010997735,0.00014965383,0.00013567334,0.00006928669,0.00027178848,0.000020524958,0.00006163318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009962924,0.00003924033,0.000066464796,0.00015878669,0.00006247037,0.00016852992,0.00007897612,0.000083491024,0.0000011837269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010263072,0.0007825297,0.12184582,0.00007865927,0.001268144,0.00003548089,0.047975224,0.0009508676,0.01984636,0.1647565,0.14121006,0.50022405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044419072,0.000096779884,0.12950796,0.00017273326,0.000024703288,0.0000020098362,0.0016301498,0.00007953928,0.0012216257,0.0012217268,0.8655433,0.000055300898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003197426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054061087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7243332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083881576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010678916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16001743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}