{"meta":{"query_hash":"84b2b51dc2bd","filters":{"venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement"},"cohort_total":17,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":17,"exported":17,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/84b2b51dc2bd","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+International+Dispute+Settlement"},"results":[{"id":"W2103503951","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idt028","title":"Enforcing Judgments of International Courts in National Courts","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Thompson Rivers University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.013197032341612498,"score_gpt":0.2511852123231272,"score_spread":0.2379881799815147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2103503951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1610263,0.0031684719,0.045522198,0.029525721,0.0010572508,0.00044117845,0.00015713573,0.00029791277,0.7588038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553272,0.00096551253,0.016851665,0.0062587946,0.0003952013,0.00018453156,0.00005315279,0.00006492882,0.01989901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9599003,0.013208689,0.004708089,0.005356449,0.010015677,0.0068108547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9451836,0.029639373,0.004497358,0.0073125865,0.010928482,0.0024386854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05604588,0.00042859194,0.0011960001,0.0018683875,0.010420546,0.022484256,0.0038069277,0.0100642955,0.006150703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094821624,0.0010592105,0.0010514406,0.002118755,0.011909925,0.009347347,0.008884248,0.013464557,0.0010912317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032959306,0.000068135705,0.0027971736,0.00006414317,0.00006204496,0.00042479037,0.008122927,0.0018424313,0.0011130479,0.9559239,0.0075395554,0.022008857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016372793,0.00021844689,0.008099979,0.0017523732,0.00035052997,0.0004511629,0.015794255,0.012826262,0.008125313,0.67056066,0.28132755,0.00032967987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029087761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062056124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05604588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011368009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027785884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29640245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2117467808","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idq020","title":"The Interplay of International Dispute Resolution Mechanisms: the Softwood Lumber Controversy","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Settlement (finance); Dispute resolution; International arbitration; Political science; Law; Softwood; Alternative dispute resolution; Investor-state dispute settlement; Law and economics; Economics; International investment; Engineering; Foreign direct investment","score_opus":0.012257921127740334,"score_gpt":0.23587639548461534,"score_spread":0.223618474356875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2117467808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12406792,0.021935798,0.02179443,0.05867384,0.0006687275,0.000055612032,0.000029484474,0.000052045245,0.7727221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98126596,0.0032521118,0.0020316078,0.0036372165,0.00046864495,0.000040232906,0.000015245952,0.000027026763,0.009262072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885507,0.006048239,0.00036498305,0.00063949026,0.00307354,0.0013231328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841309,0.012201841,0.0013037521,0.0006948843,0.0010375155,0.00063109334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014534398,0.00032170204,0.00042988043,0.0027954862,0.007879091,0.022827864,0.0015980112,0.007331851,0.00451497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019282667,0.00030586348,0.00051391165,0.002922563,0.017205752,0.008741925,0.006324593,0.005019354,0.00043483937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011481762,0.000010544902,0.0003341632,0.000025212237,0.000003715494,0.00015281184,0.00432976,0.00027076076,0.00012194976,0.98659945,0.0012537205,0.00688645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054854256,0.000053926004,0.0037459095,0.000724397,0.000046892626,0.0005564847,0.026970217,0.0026195322,0.0010945091,0.7716578,0.19239788,0.00007767507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076562464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009071148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00728511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068390216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07686615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160787068","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idr016","title":"Satisfaction as a Form of Reparation for Moral Damages Suffered by Investors and Respondent States in Investor-State Arbitration Disputes","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Arbitration; Tribunal; Law; Context (archaeology); Compensation (psychology); Redress; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01695369296199279,"score_gpt":0.2670558154122434,"score_spread":0.2501021224502506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160787068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65181077,0.0023058227,0.035978552,0.014551,0.00030382408,0.00025774533,0.000063384454,0.000084621446,0.2946444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957812,0.00014905736,0.00085946335,0.0005024434,0.000081847065,0.000032605574,0.000008132595,0.0000071194545,0.002578133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97488946,0.013128738,0.002086346,0.0014753649,0.0039319843,0.0044881892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986472,0.006854211,0.0031498217,0.0013335493,0.0014637208,0.0007265991],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017288085,0.0003845871,0.0011184631,0.0015624127,0.0063541797,0.012797583,0.002064403,0.011485374,0.004276996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029142836,0.0006800577,0.0016384427,0.002359976,0.022927377,0.011323952,0.011589034,0.007661095,0.0004832386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001490923,0.00009503582,0.0061385934,0.00009052897,0.00004067507,0.00096082693,0.01062273,0.00127835,0.00079266605,0.9681142,0.0011171467,0.010600249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024455183,0.00069196866,0.029649587,0.00044961524,0.00034257286,0.0040250244,0.03713769,0.014197958,0.0036160415,0.8665723,0.042715035,0.0003576433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002607036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003093897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017288085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004539703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003140769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09142923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273594481","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idv037","title":"Diplomats Want Treaties: Diplomatic Agendas and Perks in the Investment Regime","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University College London; International Development Research Centre; John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation","keywords":"Treaty; Negotiation; Diplomacy; Economic diplomacy; Investment (military); Work (physics); Political science; International trade; Foreign direct investment; Law and economics; Economics; International economics; Political economy; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.015763038619806803,"score_gpt":0.24436004933311378,"score_spread":0.228597010713307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273594481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21843001,0.0021438724,0.039712805,0.026343307,0.00046685172,0.00011988098,0.00007832284,0.00003647227,0.7126686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98645246,0.00032824185,0.0020491234,0.0006945124,0.00010925801,0.000066583685,0.000016366032,0.000019495885,0.010263993],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882713,0.0070787384,0.00035519464,0.0008669885,0.0016367103,0.0017909893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98499876,0.010538287,0.0021908688,0.00083201093,0.000595407,0.0008446052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013853332,0.0002811205,0.0004536374,0.001834389,0.007085869,0.013791245,0.00081512827,0.004334841,0.009173899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03300998,0.00045092707,0.0005521707,0.0023371596,0.015900817,0.013758241,0.0071956846,0.006749093,0.00053721364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023273045,0.000013107716,0.0005236513,0.0000128271995,0.000002495313,0.000043647447,0.0024135017,0.0001015488,0.00004866022,0.99349254,0.00047924707,0.0028454345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051119972,0.0000408858,0.0037442339,0.00017744862,0.000021094229,0.000104979445,0.009402447,0.0016176223,0.0003361571,0.9478787,0.036598843,0.000026445126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002026278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030057216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013853332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006510463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003463695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07326424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519950315","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idw022","title":"TPP, CETA and TTIP Between Innovation and Consolidation—Resolving Investor–State Disputes under Mega-regionals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; International trade; Investor-state dispute settlement; Arbitration; Consolidation (business); Negotiation; General partnership; State (computer science); Business; Political science; European union; International economics; Foreign direct investment; International investment; Economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.02628151520386572,"score_gpt":0.25727684029328396,"score_spread":0.23099532508941822,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519950315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39746085,0.007607706,0.030925503,0.030502649,0.00046894775,0.0001528463,0.00013384677,0.00010517272,0.5326425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98548084,0.0006533497,0.003331043,0.0016086801,0.00008759548,0.00006690607,0.000025264453,0.000022721262,0.008723488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922482,0.0035126652,0.00038507144,0.0010263862,0.0013423982,0.0014853553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9918373,0.004147762,0.0011051988,0.0011701704,0.001022169,0.0007174738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012074108,0.00021156276,0.00042552626,0.0010756324,0.004016524,0.013920256,0.002188159,0.0048196893,0.0041761557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021544846,0.00036969763,0.000642428,0.0014566906,0.007460555,0.0069635054,0.010708018,0.0057795206,0.000494132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026973748,0.000007840756,0.0011212963,0.000040613566,0.000009937436,0.00027102974,0.0030523348,0.00052659883,0.00014767639,0.9852937,0.0015808664,0.007921198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084145104,0.0002421419,0.015778745,0.0009815289,0.00012675191,0.0015088626,0.036551572,0.008825038,0.0032710144,0.62856364,0.30395108,0.0001154184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061516594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008687357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013920256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069044596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005718145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063854754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727865175","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idx016","title":"Rebalancing European Human Rights: Has the Brighton Declaration Engendered a New Deal on Human Rights in Europe?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond","keywords":"Subsidiarity; Margin of appreciation; Declaration; Human rights; Political science; Law; Politics; Fundamental rights; European union; Business","score_opus":0.0982215573856167,"score_gpt":0.3644392547754735,"score_spread":0.2662176973898568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727865175","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16405427,0.033153158,0.004894156,0.13087066,0.0020375354,0.00002365578,0.000063321306,0.00004413383,0.6648592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8963677,0.0044982936,0.0020063517,0.055605825,0.00073223986,0.000033180786,0.000039136583,0.000038807106,0.040678356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929242,0.0032215868,0.00022575828,0.0007971702,0.0013205305,0.0015108024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970784,0.0016132777,0.00044541073,0.00030183358,0.00023385274,0.00032726498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01369932,0.00026820347,0.00047455225,0.00090923964,0.003867682,0.013328089,0.0008917638,0.009951347,0.0031132025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010236489,0.00028507647,0.00045981997,0.0011457539,0.014724255,0.0069203153,0.006306569,0.0051901117,0.00040690927],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001541588,0.000012648969,0.0003299662,0.000017001483,0.000004282702,0.00010359505,0.0015460147,0.00010362104,0.000103024206,0.9805238,0.0050122463,0.012228426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006743225,0.00007986332,0.007476713,0.000717967,0.000031104995,0.0003710285,0.0046990914,0.00048006407,0.0012274554,0.46550697,0.5192289,0.00011336014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008292821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009639873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01369932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005115345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053744107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0724498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963543540","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idz013","title":"Transnational Public Policy as an International Practice in Investment Arbitration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Obligation; Redress; Doctrine; Normative; Arbitration; International investment; International arbitration; Law and economics; International law; Legal doctrine; Political science; Law; Public policy; Economics; Business; Foreign direct investment","score_opus":0.014292211681031945,"score_gpt":0.2842589343851332,"score_spread":0.26996672270410127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963543540","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049934715,0.0042287735,0.07989618,0.06691629,0.0006493782,0.0000783591,0.000023585404,0.000111549314,0.79816115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793299,0.00080944016,0.0054556117,0.0023462446,0.0001975071,0.00008292256,0.0000111694735,0.000030449233,0.011736651],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.982701,0.012199965,0.00065027334,0.0013781012,0.0019034607,0.0011671948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878962,0.007557693,0.0010423188,0.0020452489,0.00096854125,0.0004899459],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021359969,0.00033611493,0.0004145603,0.0016527498,0.006522737,0.019344633,0.0016744576,0.0071943086,0.0041738776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015954562,0.00035682466,0.00055063417,0.002115944,0.050069686,0.010287524,0.009592758,0.008521159,0.0004185247],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.0611155e-7,0.000003771427,0.000041294195,0.0000044802055,5.3248345e-7,0.000017908333,0.001528653,0.00008437105,0.000020609752,0.99707377,0.00021527629,0.0010083118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000943047,0.000022856686,0.00030514318,0.00021042803,0.00000787095,0.00013195329,0.005606218,0.0016921371,0.00024569646,0.9103515,0.08140045,0.00001625413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031683936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030014492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021359969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068266476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069556357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11296362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094429225","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idaa016","title":"Frivolous and Abuse of Process Claims in Investor–State Arbitration: Can Rules on Cost Allocation Become Solution?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Process (computing); Ex-ante; State (computer science); Law and economics; Business; Ex parte; Deterrence theory; Economics; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.020337165585521625,"score_gpt":0.25413140314036325,"score_spread":0.23379423755484163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094429225","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24068421,0.0035599482,0.45068496,0.07933553,0.0010004322,0.000569719,0.00010376141,0.00015025825,0.2239112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9696918,0.0004258371,0.024767198,0.0013829963,0.00034661306,0.00017560303,0.00001387885,0.00002967051,0.0031664318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94450843,0.029620213,0.004177949,0.0043045203,0.012518861,0.0048700324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8774689,0.08699291,0.010639986,0.014242799,0.008721149,0.0019343012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06361658,0.00058890285,0.0015730021,0.0038700602,0.005585638,0.021453146,0.0044005853,0.01039908,0.0039862837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13822961,0.0008780541,0.0013230345,0.0021718277,0.03568787,0.020793488,0.008311167,0.012463391,0.00034845708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025348012,0.000017097478,0.0003890396,0.000016109672,0.000008898192,0.000040451883,0.00042197242,0.001871594,0.000057620957,0.9914718,0.00044422998,0.005235717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017334993,0.000015914526,0.00042397995,0.00010631475,0.000013698482,0.000046093173,0.00058832526,0.0072933584,0.00016868449,0.98827666,0.0030217287,0.000027861211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045150253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047319247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06361658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071190554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007599131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33644068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121516341","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idv031","title":"Investment Treaties and the Internal Vetting of Regulatory Proposals: A Case Study from Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Vetting; Investment (military); Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.010201609385001477,"score_gpt":0.22220159089821898,"score_spread":0.2119999815132175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121516341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410317,0.00061181816,0.0007355098,0.0055317385,0.000037855978,0.00017729827,0.00013731602,0.000013847214,0.051722925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991222,0.00052628905,0.00057397917,0.00067576923,0.000010394172,0.000033879358,0.00006488984,0.0000094373145,0.006883295],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852588,0.0032959383,0.00046162974,0.00078866776,0.004688656,0.0055062743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977206,0.0113453735,0.0021707807,0.0010236806,0.0054862252,0.0027679102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009169982,0.00040935393,0.0006005493,0.0024667683,0.037374947,0.008108826,0.0025780506,0.0040072375,0.0027078988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024019398,0.00057647435,0.00052146055,0.006411204,0.009021213,0.0017346968,0.004134826,0.0052994457,0.00018296453],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003224962,0.00070810737,0.20829241,0.00029602018,0.000100153935,0.02106416,0.5477934,0.004972012,0.0027818854,0.12978388,0.019170834,0.06471454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015524212,0.00017380372,0.15248078,0.00048275178,0.00014632824,0.0028642835,0.6553061,0.006161499,0.0022690005,0.0042216848,0.17551343,0.00022503805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9912243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18385416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9666607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209117114","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idab024","title":"Procedural Cross-Fertilization in International Commercial and Investment Arbitration: A Functional Approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Investment (military); Human fertilization; Business; Economics; International economics; Political science; Law; Biology","score_opus":0.022154284359933895,"score_gpt":0.2593736863617492,"score_spread":0.2372194020018153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209117114","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047974434,0.0013090376,0.69271046,0.0057889824,0.00016252021,0.00022025123,0.00003480941,0.00012634246,0.2516731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89914495,0.00052148127,0.083930776,0.00084751466,0.00022825913,0.00034488586,0.000051635016,0.00006999115,0.014860466],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9627597,0.0264504,0.001501784,0.001722083,0.0056977463,0.0018682616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96343386,0.02342425,0.00234166,0.005540449,0.004563703,0.0006960406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045563255,0.00069032924,0.0007299,0.0036806453,0.0036304127,0.010730277,0.0058177416,0.005652096,0.01002903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037698414,0.0010269495,0.001919803,0.0017231904,0.020673398,0.013528484,0.007989642,0.0046881414,0.0008589944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010482881,0.000022327613,0.00027379344,0.000032378666,0.000007380631,0.000059694266,0.0007090797,0.0018678947,0.00020202284,0.9908827,0.00013442281,0.0057978826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002518193,0.00012717678,0.0011291744,0.00034807416,0.000046174206,0.0003191211,0.0015492212,0.033605546,0.0016509839,0.93864316,0.022507703,0.000048480688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021504345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018616919,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045563255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005941424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044014417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24096435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214478666","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idab028","title":"State Responsibility for the Conduct of Rebels in Situations of Unsuccessful Civil Wars: A Critical Analysis of the <i>Cengiz v Libya</i> Case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; State responsibility; State (computer science); Context (archaeology); Spanish Civil War; Law; Political science; Arbitration; Insurgency; Government (linguistics); Commission; Embodied cognition; Law and economics; Sociology; International law; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030866138563965057,"score_gpt":0.3133803678165132,"score_spread":0.2825142292525481,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214478666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39699838,0.0041571027,0.007918131,0.06628818,0.00083263614,0.00033330786,0.00003925014,0.00004259149,0.5233905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860892,0.0008369827,0.00077137863,0.0032950358,0.00016021932,0.00011433565,0.000008310488,0.0000136654635,0.008710774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98991454,0.005347929,0.00026931407,0.0005824073,0.0010217931,0.0028639669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9819041,0.014798959,0.0010107852,0.00044153683,0.0013534576,0.00049114204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01828399,0.0006298928,0.00065876334,0.0039707776,0.030667808,0.017580878,0.0027030974,0.013787887,0.005206312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01931149,0.0007678318,0.0007272173,0.0021440878,0.044181228,0.007762041,0.008490311,0.016702916,0.0003224282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025600284,0.00005228443,0.0012937282,0.00006259471,0.000011255186,0.0024620648,0.05011203,0.0005516097,0.00015010335,0.9367395,0.004718748,0.0038205187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008404659,0.00021286418,0.007233815,0.0020417732,0.000110921166,0.0022320265,0.43608624,0.0048754686,0.0020812375,0.3054131,0.23940918,0.0002193582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03875245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05854223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03875245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024372412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013332065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17683506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285388102","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idac016","title":"Reconsidering International Compensation in Historical Context","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); International law; Law; Political science; International arbitration; Collateral; Work (physics); Law and economics; Arbitration; Sociology; History; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy; Psychology","score_opus":0.04086850735974812,"score_gpt":0.24026352433192055,"score_spread":0.19939501697217243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285388102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065817416,0.04518138,0.00626125,0.07907911,0.0026048727,0.000018825245,0.0001268904,0.000038295206,0.80087197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9712568,0.0093403235,0.00065068837,0.003087052,0.0013141772,0.00001707406,0.000051877967,0.000027741065,0.01425427],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967373,0.0014426393,0.00016135188,0.00043283403,0.00047194713,0.0007538508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997503,0.0012306883,0.0004206097,0.0002164023,0.00042991943,0.00019949532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042062625,0.00033166827,0.00030921327,0.003911998,0.0057561845,0.013156575,0.0007784999,0.0034372217,0.006540461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006342374,0.00017902472,0.0002509632,0.004885867,0.01705394,0.009313285,0.0041027027,0.00518104,0.00043637102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005430527,0.0000053094764,0.00039312188,0.000022660213,0.0000015589272,0.00007117469,0.0049410183,0.00010983517,0.000022487582,0.98787075,0.0022955616,0.0042611044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047116973,0.00002371452,0.002347497,0.00074903504,0.000011068399,0.0004415248,0.018016823,0.0005318476,0.00032768337,0.21521112,0.7623102,0.000024762609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071245716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008093339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013156575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009650745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002132632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07002145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383652676","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idad017","title":"A tale of policy carve-outs and general exceptions: <i>Eco Oro v Colombia</i> as a case study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expropriation; Tribunal; Scope (computer science); Duty; Political science; State (computer science); Free trade agreement; Law and economics; Law; Investment (military); Business; Free trade; Economics; International trade; Politics","score_opus":0.016746252290846145,"score_gpt":0.29200211362605927,"score_spread":0.2752558613352131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383652676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34091955,0.007584438,0.003685246,0.0538209,0.00046302515,0.00032680732,0.0003706141,0.00007399908,0.5927554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97918886,0.0012900342,0.0009968777,0.0030341488,0.00006899065,0.000091160466,0.000055409648,0.000026098589,0.015248426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937323,0.0025109504,0.00017301812,0.0005357172,0.0010407873,0.00200713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459064,0.0032298155,0.00047857355,0.00040046423,0.000825038,0.00047545377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052793478,0.0004742739,0.0006078274,0.0019010324,0.014688956,0.012382332,0.0017972523,0.00646847,0.005909466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008225799,0.0002748273,0.0004915904,0.0027568894,0.009928428,0.0031487858,0.003481404,0.005697889,0.00026186905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011127145,0.00011418426,0.012029832,0.00033146923,0.000033738386,0.009346091,0.03260784,0.0024617156,0.00075636955,0.8884374,0.03246047,0.021309575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000108138185,0.0001234314,0.02654661,0.0015091196,0.00015067663,0.0027425145,0.27481946,0.004996519,0.002233983,0.08130011,0.6051397,0.00032972533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36317918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51015794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36317918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026768886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009640556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7221305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391175956","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idad032","title":"The legitimation of international adjudication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"Danmarks Grundforskningsfond","keywords":"Legitimation; Adjudication; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012101558634873095,"score_gpt":0.3317657695548968,"score_spread":0.3196642109200237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391175956","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36361998,0.0034595288,0.05569176,0.05494914,0.0012522528,0.00021929598,0.00018884549,0.00016114881,0.5204581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949409,0.00017092914,0.0015244754,0.0003499068,0.00016233142,0.00003821995,0.000028469394,0.00003985644,0.0027448789],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8675435,0.07997415,0.0061802706,0.010507006,0.031330146,0.0044649984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.604199,0.30302995,0.026863055,0.028580485,0.03436831,0.002959169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.096848615,0.00035424787,0.0008624841,0.0086413175,0.01368281,0.02113913,0.0029164737,0.0047941045,0.003550511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2661331,0.0006543563,0.00043562832,0.006448747,0.05507066,0.015628016,0.012721181,0.010462637,0.00049163867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003166003,0.00002423018,0.0030427314,0.000080055084,0.000014153707,0.00016266388,0.06984387,0.00022060747,0.00025743412,0.9052005,0.0021030898,0.019019052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045525725,0.00007579582,0.011582343,0.0019804167,0.000055704488,0.00036089777,0.072130665,0.0050647445,0.0026424804,0.69841313,0.2075121,0.00013616003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006177613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049511422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096848615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013422041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011463543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5121906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392286503","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idae005","title":"Banning oil and gas activities under international investment law: a problem of indeterminacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Investment (military); Law; International investment; Political science; Fossil fuel; International law; Philosophy; Economics; Engineering; Foreign direct investment; Epistemology; Finance; Politics","score_opus":0.013608027478423044,"score_gpt":0.2526006323770834,"score_spread":0.23899260489866037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392286503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09552138,0.006949676,0.087507546,0.10458465,0.00090146123,0.0001477066,0.00023192742,0.0001764165,0.7039794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97226375,0.0018768173,0.005206448,0.0049632518,0.00084160175,0.00013581842,0.000053755793,0.00007883789,0.014579644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98254055,0.0066539445,0.0014425353,0.002176993,0.0054028207,0.0017830516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95792866,0.029639082,0.0025217424,0.005517607,0.003371225,0.0010216705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018369101,0.00040616558,0.0014180264,0.002005029,0.0052094073,0.016178718,0.0026754579,0.009558072,0.008270933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061410848,0.000767578,0.00079364894,0.0027870303,0.029673634,0.018963713,0.008854952,0.014632326,0.00096163835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015197372,0.000009594466,0.00017407522,0.000014891693,0.000004373426,0.00006879712,0.00049459765,0.0003630024,0.000073690586,0.99321306,0.0012659231,0.0043028435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020899557,0.0000093712715,0.00026025588,0.000061719526,0.0000079279935,0.000059757836,0.00025543006,0.0010837845,0.000116857096,0.9853372,0.01277297,0.000013801307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064641293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004283349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018369101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005651001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005251829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09714621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402548180","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idae018","title":"Arbitration in cross-border data protection disputes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"Dispute Resolution and Class Actions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0320758617540472,"score_gpt":0.3671973468882235,"score_spread":0.3351214851341763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402548180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.086208746,0.009974926,0.23470357,0.075130366,0.0016861527,0.0010460403,0.00019029592,0.00019240745,0.5908675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9267134,0.00257378,0.029833544,0.0062922514,0.00069873844,0.0010133164,0.00013067342,0.00010061314,0.032643676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86413234,0.08730304,0.010901446,0.011444409,0.01713982,0.009078987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8623814,0.10979753,0.0077460622,0.010434809,0.007517291,0.0021229049],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11033738,0.0008256906,0.001944844,0.004248636,0.021261469,0.02513875,0.007237069,0.022614157,0.015734503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16982381,0.0011750371,0.0024121683,0.004840145,0.04017647,0.029083716,0.030751847,0.01345623,0.0019767624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001652217,0.000012903212,0.00029498187,0.000060051112,0.000009964594,0.00046131897,0.0077022277,0.00034082064,0.00007937065,0.9848379,0.0013521137,0.004831867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048963357,0.0000270984,0.00032191275,0.00062179886,0.00003175853,0.00047845527,0.0074540684,0.003172729,0.0004016464,0.90523607,0.08215133,0.00005412777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049211117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00299403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11033738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009379932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0123662595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5835268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409148924","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idaf017","title":"<i>Deripaska v Montenegro</i>: the alpha and omega of State succession to BITs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Montenegro; Omega; Ecological succession; Alpha (finance); State (computer science); Mathematics; Philosophy; History; Biology; Ethnology; Botany; Statistics; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.009722941722857389,"score_gpt":0.3239730956249972,"score_spread":0.31425015390213984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409148924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1557345,0.00084214093,0.0021949501,0.015206118,0.0003369656,0.00006647052,0.00004931108,0.00001783825,0.8255518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745198,0.00017164725,0.00033383697,0.0025150059,0.0000712068,0.00003235498,0.000011539858,0.000008729737,0.022335917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944043,0.001275985,0.00022545576,0.00064992247,0.00098586,0.0024583458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984359,0.00065393304,0.00021134324,0.00023888813,0.00021804347,0.00024184473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047847833,0.00022455076,0.0005738501,0.00075882697,0.00621818,0.007120579,0.0014509347,0.0042507485,0.0054217544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005261381,0.00037638843,0.0005705147,0.0006329456,0.01029153,0.0026209238,0.005128386,0.006460064,0.00047649432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055512395,0.000023689352,0.001761063,0.000023564095,0.0000071331037,0.00072784483,0.0016094977,0.00028593122,0.00031039433,0.98743606,0.0038312413,0.003928159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002612145,0.00027457302,0.025728399,0.0008410027,0.00020008338,0.0036481863,0.024089204,0.0059285234,0.004447983,0.39280462,0.54148173,0.0002944914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05514277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09666107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05514277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007792848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046155774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10964358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}