{"meta":{"query_hash":"41ede23a6be4","filters":{"venue":"Journal of International Economic Law"},"cohort_total":42,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":42,"exported":42,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/41ede23a6be4","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+International+Economic+Law"},"results":[{"id":"W1497581234","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgv040","title":"How Some Countries Became ‘Special’: Developing Countries and the Construction of Difference in Multilateral Trade Lawmaking","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Developing country; International trade; International economics; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Economics; Least Developed Countries; Multilateral trade negotiations; Tariff; Negotiation; TRIPS architecture; Argument (complex analysis); Developed country; Free trade; Political science; Economic growth; Law; Legislature; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01760362195032438,"score_gpt":0.26005675388035016,"score_spread":0.24245313193002577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1497581234","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79645455,0.00025616205,0.0002103216,0.19507901,0.003141727,0.00015030876,0.000019201076,0.000009364809,0.0046793334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970988,0.000487203,0.0006999566,0.00057683943,0.00101906,9.3994254e-7,9.0272795e-7,0.000005682394,0.00011062816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990823,0.00009267544,0.00041401063,0.000077275006,0.0002336312,0.000100083314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901515,0.00022293661,0.0005334179,0.000040890405,0.00014211431,0.000045459004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000723192,0.00007070119,0.00020773748,0.00009273416,0.00009311456,0.0002323929,0.00023939533,0.00004578958,0.000039498937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013172263,0.000055210698,0.000035420682,0.000042714655,0.0009468054,0.00086475105,0.000028905843,0.00010576979,0.0000014990748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000777629,0.0000052730943,0.015037774,0.0000032980442,0.000034537694,0.000002051677,0.005243688,0.0000783688,0.0000046236996,0.9792902,0.00011995404,0.00010250966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007890594,0.000058016023,0.040567014,0.00032027287,0.00004842309,0.00017086587,0.009543917,0.00069475593,0.0014154381,0.1066859,0.8322284,0.00037638703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003219324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025402105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87260425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042455536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035812342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3488544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569108765","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgi060","title":"Editorial Comment: Adding Sweeteners to Softwood Lumber: the WTO–NAFTA ‘Spaghetti Bowl’ is Cooking","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International trade; World trade; Softwood; Competitor analysis; Business; Economics; International economics; Engineering; Pulp and paper industry","score_opus":0.017959491930213373,"score_gpt":0.23233224574824532,"score_spread":0.21437275381803195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569108765","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00056339597,0.00054537936,0.000106814274,0.005941115,0.9405363,0.00021860162,0.002984778,0.00001914056,0.04908446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067220815,0.0005201438,0.0002552237,0.0032569985,0.9872221,0.0000180363,0.00018363004,0.000103677114,0.0017181505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573547,0.000030245375,0.0028195803,0.0006111727,0.00024550594,0.0005580405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951615,0.00053643156,0.0033708345,0.00044053126,0.00025496873,0.0002357444],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001453146,0.0005380911,0.0013202002,0.00039798758,0.00023469399,0.0008175322,0.0022507764,0.0007341168,0.0006304962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029083792,0.0005250735,0.00087163685,0.00007385212,0.00012456409,0.00075021107,0.00029902096,0.0013038401,0.00089809304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009118097,0.00006434369,0.00018987208,0.00003167273,0.00076603185,0.0000065976087,0.00010092753,0.0016070844,0.0000013579613,0.040689684,0.95641583,0.00003539805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012969445,0.00012933243,0.000019207011,0.00018886862,0.00007334157,0.000016871683,0.000038209928,0.00021997091,0.000018930637,0.007333326,0.99013567,0.00052932557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019154933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042425975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047366306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024290865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020799342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011659846","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgm007","title":"The WTO, Science, and the Environment: Moving Towards Consistency","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Consistency (knowledge bases); Differential (mechanical device); Variety (cybernetics); Politics; Differential treatment; Public economics; Economics; Measure (data warehouse); Law and economics; Business; International trade; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.008103720140071742,"score_gpt":0.25266128345798244,"score_spread":0.2445575633179107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011659846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13864192,0.0004834412,0.00026081462,0.14424665,0.0037806656,0.00016421686,0.00000349804,0.000010782378,0.712408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973417,0.00038449533,0.00015389328,0.00075997127,0.0005373743,4.1881765e-7,1.0882728e-7,0.000004275347,0.00081774325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989739,0.0000436871,0.00035755604,0.00007475235,0.0004086869,0.00014141644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989469,0.00042714106,0.0003332782,0.00007123401,0.00014223755,0.00007917535],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052775885,0.000048901635,0.000083509636,0.000057116817,0.0008901717,0.00030229753,0.0005790352,0.0000206478,0.00022911666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003813399,0.000027909558,0.00004455621,0.00005614782,0.003085795,0.00046636452,0.00006701323,0.000113068294,0.000015932505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017174722,0.000005618971,0.0006820574,2.2328005e-7,0.000024721783,0.0000015237154,0.0008098733,0.000022463384,0.000031744068,0.9964975,0.00028244103,0.0016246717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008183332,0.000012799699,0.008061424,0.000008342901,0.000014466607,0.000037046724,0.002085854,0.000116209536,0.0004042337,0.01586138,0.9725121,0.000067756875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021972047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006667371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9806361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046144528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002965121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99962723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013696089","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgi051","title":"Planes, Trains and Automobiles: The Impact of the WTO ‘Court’ on Canada in its First Ten Years","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Settlement (finance); Economics","score_opus":0.007514751318191372,"score_gpt":0.25432171082134103,"score_spread":0.24680695950314965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013696089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9397868,0.0000394934,3.3082276e-7,0.045914494,0.00039994167,0.00006911939,0.000036126767,0.0000018325125,0.013751875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884415,0.000060177004,0.000008660601,0.00039191692,0.00034194317,4.9715635e-7,5.6282255e-7,0.0000049201217,0.000347173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993889,0.000043435542,0.00026778752,0.000052071133,0.00016730325,0.000080499696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944335,0.00016514865,0.0002574285,0.00005293684,0.000040276638,0.00004083803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002981787,0.000049329206,0.00009461259,0.000037481495,0.00007250963,0.00003859511,0.0003644005,0.00002386894,0.00042104948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060745864,0.000029550456,0.000050643994,0.000041964686,0.000106579275,0.00016749033,0.000017460632,0.00011443561,0.0000030961396],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009264385,0.00018929849,0.1087647,0.00000549302,0.00041432088,0.000019766321,0.012736119,0.12684669,0.00007133561,0.6937495,0.055665888,0.0014442707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081644685,0.00004552481,0.61298525,0.00006919159,0.000010990311,0.000041883162,0.0007808826,0.00079954765,0.00016918941,0.00044489242,0.38372868,0.00010747573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.107752815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84041864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73266584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000851948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056305685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8981887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2047981006","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgs036","title":"The G20 and Global Economic Governance: Lessons from Multi-Level European Governance?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Prosperity; Corporate governance; Public good; Multi-level governance; Interdependence; Political science; European union; Global governance; Public administration; Economic system; Economics; Political economy; International trade; Law; Management","score_opus":0.0443269791198582,"score_gpt":0.32697374721760186,"score_spread":0.28264676809774364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2047981006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37726015,0.0040619643,0.00020143161,0.02825849,0.010472263,0.00012704631,0.0014762479,0.000024044535,0.5781183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874722,0.0045962473,0.00038016046,0.0011653958,0.0034396981,7.2708116e-7,0.0000019187464,0.0000143911,0.0029292577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986644,0.00019255055,0.0005203218,0.00013757907,0.00019917177,0.0002860112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983552,0.0003051058,0.000975198,0.00013698394,0.00005451599,0.00017299161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012027133,0.0001277644,0.00017089088,0.000008956679,0.0003607701,0.00023463015,0.00077153207,0.000043177886,0.0002098001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021102942,0.000102958846,0.00013053791,0.000019049621,0.00037438478,0.0010089448,0.00012948566,0.00019107983,0.0002731753],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004209665,0.000029418366,0.023884013,7.096261e-7,0.000086891974,0.000004704077,0.0005864108,0.000034126137,0.0000064049987,0.9599277,0.010984393,0.004413182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050919276,0.000010201324,0.37148762,0.000022190143,0.000009475475,0.000017684988,0.0001376979,0.00003135841,0.000017272905,0.0013265312,0.62633735,0.00009342795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004519525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008314946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9586011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009652943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017501734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68321997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2053176140","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgl006","title":"The Evolving American Policy on Investment Protection: Evidence from Recent FTAs and the 2004 Model BIT","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Investment (military); Treaty; Investment protection; Bilateral investment treaty; International trade; Free trade agreement; Government (linguistics); Balance (ability); Free trade; International economics; Foreign direct investment; Economics; State (computer science); Political science; Politics; Law; International investment; Macroeconomics","score_opus":0.018945983242287513,"score_gpt":0.23798305669333567,"score_spread":0.21903707345104814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2053176140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15920503,0.000922959,0.0019953984,0.3638934,0.0030286824,0.0006699983,0.000018934386,0.000043668322,0.47022194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605159,0.00033640975,0.00022433542,0.03420836,0.0040820944,0.000018444762,0.00000534873,0.000012842494,0.000596248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989553,0.000021845792,0.00050743145,0.00012963246,0.0002728391,0.000112939524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863684,0.00015715726,0.0008335443,0.00011012017,0.00024865047,0.000013676621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005311696,0.00011802699,0.00013763561,0.00011382407,0.00025467947,0.00065048545,0.00036378248,0.000020236763,0.00011172572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014874327,0.00006821025,0.000094836534,0.00006048697,0.0002925537,0.001075405,0.000071394184,0.00016508202,0.00006889601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002490709,0.00002895137,0.00017462911,0.000001389924,0.000077217555,0.00000125632,0.000016713879,0.009080945,0.000091675676,0.98272824,0.0069246613,0.0006252737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016215708,0.000039307866,0.0020857302,0.000119236174,0.000031037383,0.000016425201,0.000074145224,0.28688425,0.00033265422,0.30507922,0.40354937,0.00016703413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067962953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088117196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8013109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003705418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010249271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098207935","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgt012","title":"Geographical Indications, Conflicted Preferential Agreements, and Market Access","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Nullification; De facto; Market access; Intellectual property; Negotiation; International trade; Trade agreement; Customs union; European union; Free trade; Trade barrier; Single market; Business; International economics; Rules of origin; Compensation (psychology); International free trade agreement; Free trade agreement; Economics; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.036604213397438044,"score_gpt":0.24168837476227514,"score_spread":0.2050841613648371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098207935","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8678994,0.0005907149,0.00032576898,0.0050490303,0.0016234405,0.0002035841,0.00022051299,0.000012176219,0.12407536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968932,0.0009475317,0.00040061458,0.0009981648,0.00029116182,0.000009759233,0.00001444087,0.000012421368,0.00043270623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985449,0.000010335853,0.001045492,0.00020053434,0.000034353332,0.00016442742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867827,0.000043183667,0.00093672186,0.00013838001,0.000063494,0.00013996479],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028372067,0.00012393306,0.00033756247,0.00025562916,0.00005684853,0.00038485104,0.00056298357,0.00009094502,0.0059091067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034493307,0.00013325713,0.00013599869,0.000034085708,0.00010154231,0.0012966648,0.00011513899,0.00017228347,0.0003372462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039179264,0.00010959555,0.13066927,0.000023121815,0.0006016936,0.0000017845001,0.000051013376,0.00004634241,0.000010760721,0.85369974,0.014428303,0.00031921628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003019174,0.00015837049,0.47004324,0.00007759811,0.000046239955,0.00018182048,0.0000802387,0.0034532552,0.00010993244,0.2121815,0.3101285,0.0005201013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058154884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006075543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64151824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018356206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022724202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99499965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2113998448","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgq051","title":"Binding Tariff Preferences for Developing Countries Under Article II Gatt","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Tariff; Preference; Economics; International economics; Predictability; Market access; Developing country; Business; International trade; Law and economics; Public economics; Microeconomics; Agriculture; Economic growth","score_opus":0.022502567337733443,"score_gpt":0.29777958015628,"score_spread":0.27527701281854655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2113998448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9263976,0.000012999242,0.0007683168,0.049400818,0.0041248864,0.00009394078,0.000015319001,0.000017031789,0.019169085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99308795,0.000049898965,0.004272904,0.0007625706,0.0010394672,0.0000021264989,0.0000025417621,0.000009173879,0.0007733535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999219,0.000019577998,0.00037072712,0.00008877335,0.00016531981,0.00013662632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990799,0.00019706416,0.00035290656,0.000047774727,0.00025846745,0.000063903535],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006082899,0.00006262577,0.00011498265,0.00007861041,0.0003765041,0.00019960273,0.00035763168,0.00005696784,0.0010170917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001247424,0.00005919867,0.00005871423,0.000040798466,0.00018871509,0.0007597278,0.000030797553,0.00012629679,0.00003909395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013240012,0.000013206356,0.0042783488,0.0000016043873,0.000055699198,4.5854716e-7,0.0008714215,0.00007790889,0.0005967138,0.992814,0.0011992286,0.000078178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005979849,0.00003100483,0.0039665615,0.000025918174,0.000016451057,0.000015141236,0.0006588693,0.00008637247,0.006440694,0.036615495,0.9514034,0.00014212032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015011813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048371484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9561985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025659462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046188885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998961},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2116963978","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgp002","title":"Regulatory Convergence, Security and Global Administrative Law in Canada-United States Trade","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Accountability; International trade; Politics; MRAS; Economics; Political science; Business; International economics; Law and economics; Public administration; Law; Economic growth","score_opus":0.01094334962799981,"score_gpt":0.23010350725449352,"score_spread":0.2191601576264937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2116963978","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8305581,0.000036939593,0.00000778624,0.011456257,0.00089896895,0.000064298605,0.000029832601,0.0000062430922,0.15694156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9568029,0.000025371066,0.00004147002,0.042631213,0.00043945725,7.8483475e-7,0.00003595715,0.0000037677873,0.000019051486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990597,0.000009317608,0.0005142524,0.00011233084,0.00019279987,0.000111615576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993829,0.00002483844,0.0004195835,0.000047970345,0.00009872399,0.000025995201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018343447,0.00010932379,0.00015762105,0.000096948905,0.00004396459,0.00013619727,0.0002076903,0.000029014549,0.00032897448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001270151,0.00010304616,0.000048075606,0.000055184482,0.0000670535,0.001188384,0.000020909607,0.000115793984,0.000009205373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079420264,0.000040056082,0.0052254456,0.0000040189734,0.000039797964,0.000026626612,0.000026651163,0.0004480421,0.0000124817625,0.99019176,0.0038746705,0.000031034724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002630123,0.00008359489,0.09462119,0.00010948922,0.000030139929,0.00012325095,0.000725785,0.038598657,0.00035252233,0.26346424,0.5988544,0.00040660895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18211572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52179384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7267275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064586254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021042288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82333064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125044738","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgu008","title":"Comparing the 'Four Pillars' of Global Economic Governance: A Critical Analysis of the Institutional Design of the FSB, IMF, World Bank, and WTO","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Corporate governance; Enforcement; Treaty; Payment; Balance of payments; Business; Economics; Public administration; Accounting; International trade; Finance; Political science; Law; International economics","score_opus":0.01990581439108472,"score_gpt":0.2761173849498435,"score_spread":0.25621157055875876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125044738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9249765,0.00015787217,0.001718967,0.03999075,0.0024158123,0.0001872845,0.00011840465,0.000005050903,0.030429317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99905604,0.00004184975,0.0002933096,0.00028848363,0.00023778396,7.358858e-7,4.390923e-7,0.0000043915875,0.000076936674],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855924,0.00022851638,0.0007042243,0.00010358047,0.00029888496,0.00010557723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821556,0.0004932078,0.00089991034,0.00015534088,0.0001940587,0.000041912117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010970354,0.000083076644,0.0002985471,0.000048453352,0.00019088134,0.000054749995,0.0008515268,0.0000370492,0.00029559087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034203986,0.00005150475,0.00022334374,0.00021034491,0.0011611293,0.0002808564,0.00011778369,0.00012568063,0.0000022887696],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002393805,0.00002311652,0.12822193,0.000002925141,0.00035402356,1.7574877e-7,0.00016465256,0.03386919,0.0000298507,0.8369919,0.000291225,0.00002706379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008840905,0.00003379819,0.92921495,0.00011846429,0.0005324202,0.000029418417,0.00020971884,0.024721785,0.00057504553,0.012617429,0.030913703,0.00014916534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000928733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078637125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8243745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051152444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041102074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4388136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146844156","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgt032","title":"Dispute Settlement Under the WTO and RTAs: An Uneasy Relationship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Opposition (politics); Argument (complex analysis); World trade; International trade; Political science; Law and economics; Settlement (finance); Law; Economics; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.0189091898935893,"score_gpt":0.23626403855996977,"score_spread":0.21735484866638047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146844156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7361847,0.000049489707,0.00047182877,0.0520994,0.0021377776,0.00019728363,0.0000099410145,0.00001908026,0.20883046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96494555,0.000010093495,0.00018776557,0.032635953,0.0016400341,0.0000072418925,0.000024357916,0.000010225499,0.0005387477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991805,0.000012200691,0.00043647535,0.00010152611,0.00017747098,0.00009183558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991878,0.00006875333,0.00043650085,0.00008750968,0.00019904539,0.000020334002],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030477517,0.00009729122,0.00009885702,0.00010363066,0.00013059172,0.0005824228,0.00029820233,0.000028834715,0.0017209628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021407675,0.00006477256,0.00006923424,0.000025220701,0.00008373805,0.0029642396,0.00006111818,0.00012608714,0.00031167292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012262808,0.000033509517,0.0056158234,0.0000027926953,0.00006431453,8.591316e-7,0.000019026886,0.000567226,0.000058140224,0.98529774,0.008234923,0.00009335239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013103072,0.00004695552,0.132906,0.00004335178,0.00005455275,0.000061816594,0.00057499827,0.029465172,0.000103894774,0.31171563,0.5234582,0.00025913166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030917823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023631816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67358214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010149099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002002345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153194441","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgm023","title":"Enforcing WTO Obligations: What Can We Learn from Export Subsidies?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; International trade; Business; International economics; Law and economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018652648137773196,"score_gpt":0.2842049888362767,"score_spread":0.26555234069850353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153194441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7668707,0.00077914324,0.0011657976,0.09965939,0.011904224,0.0001836647,0.000029131848,0.000060315193,0.11934764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99310434,0.0010949809,0.00097416394,0.0010034817,0.002184137,6.60282e-7,0.000010592078,0.000015809303,0.0016118296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986439,0.000039937975,0.0006848145,0.00012407817,0.00032264274,0.00018465339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985885,0.00027516313,0.00063867687,0.00009050731,0.00025037216,0.00015677178],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009902111,0.00009196312,0.00016847478,0.00015937496,0.00022038491,0.00038838235,0.00046538326,0.000069658076,0.0023419443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013053506,0.000095694384,0.00010748232,0.000086353,0.00017709521,0.0018984673,0.000033614764,0.00017905401,0.00010476988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029618534,0.000037047197,0.0144210085,0.0000014509694,0.00016710327,0.000026854512,0.007571289,0.00042817308,0.0002206873,0.9727643,0.0018248437,0.0025075902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007761261,0.0000305802,0.010569921,0.00014329815,0.000030444478,0.000030376723,0.015889315,0.00006401653,0.003695845,0.021213831,0.947319,0.00023729914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016740708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014177147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9515505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008856153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033576245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160640790","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgn022","title":"Non-State Global Standard Setting and the WTO: Legitimacy and the Need for Regulatory Space","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":137,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Technical barriers to trade; International trade; Environmental standard; Transnational governance; Business; Corporate governance; Standardization; Soft law; State (computer science); International law; Law and economics; Politics; Trade barrier; Political science; Economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.008950576207029224,"score_gpt":0.24445657301822576,"score_spread":0.23550599681119655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160640790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.956262,0.00018576044,0.00017725579,0.026420176,0.0007199536,0.00026672508,0.000021213029,0.000006846637,0.015940048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962445,0.00008480798,0.000066520646,0.0022278845,0.0012560951,0.000002923539,0.0000016003446,0.0000072292846,0.00010842254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992711,0.000015604202,0.0003509012,0.00009344592,0.00013077389,0.00013818868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907035,0.00016831231,0.00045771545,0.00006845871,0.00021748536,0.00001767294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010434083,0.000104113315,0.0002333117,0.000030212279,0.00029894433,0.00033266807,0.00020780912,0.000027146358,0.000011226971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016683152,0.00006019134,0.00014768228,0.000026742862,0.00059305556,0.00084651227,0.00007855944,0.000098042394,0.0000014143423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.003017231,0.000024967394,0.029784715,0.000046518362,0.00035145556,0.000011120669,0.0010035929,0.000711803,0.000002512111,0.95469296,0.009459819,0.0008932789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03902637,0.00008099922,0.10441839,0.00012558869,0.00030625047,0.00035315304,0.010731487,0.017091502,0.000021634762,0.6596573,0.16768661,0.0005007403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006208543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012707256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29503572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019808274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006419679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3207926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171332537","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgv022","title":"The Puzzle of Agricultural Exceptionalism in International Trade Policy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Protectionism; Economics; Exceptionalism; Subsidy; Agriculture; Normative; Free trade; International trade; Principal (computer security); Liberalization; International economics; Commercial policy; Politics; Public economics; Political science; Market economy; Law","score_opus":0.04802503413222402,"score_gpt":0.24799138828084474,"score_spread":0.19996635414862074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171332537","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62583107,0.0011485281,0.00007547206,0.0646399,0.007595623,0.00016067123,0.00040388646,0.000009578264,0.30013528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99760604,0.00044539105,0.00022649151,0.00047244967,0.00091008545,0.0000030728113,0.000012861247,0.000009528653,0.00031405172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982573,0.000013516079,0.0013574554,0.00013981646,0.000066247754,0.00016567606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854654,0.00007410056,0.0011121602,0.00012277394,0.000045282606,0.000099164565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007806296,0.00011326033,0.00032705104,0.00021327603,0.000036257024,0.000101726364,0.00079124747,0.00007108112,0.00011401384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014388685,0.00009502032,0.00021639973,0.000058338683,0.00010780374,0.0006428283,0.000064825115,0.00017308632,0.00009149463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005955,0.00007222317,0.011314631,0.0000044278254,0.00017635233,0.000002803846,0.0002755005,0.0041643814,0.000013557869,0.97972983,0.004090608,0.00009615481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040501407,0.0001606034,0.12075185,0.00008828206,0.000013101929,0.0002809014,0.0012248523,0.0011829075,0.00026444977,0.23680754,0.63478184,0.00039350832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000434992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029955828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74292225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008645174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084435764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3874816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2281840638","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgv043","title":"Can Informal Law Discipline Subsidies?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; International law; Coercion (linguistics); Public economics; Political science; Incentive; Economics; Law and economics; Law; Business; Market economy","score_opus":0.021755193657529356,"score_gpt":0.2928403218566368,"score_spread":0.2710851281991074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2281840638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13387303,0.000051723735,0.000079985206,0.09514764,0.00549079,0.00008178603,0.00002995443,0.000028898472,0.7652162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944011,0.000029501265,0.0005049957,0.0011819875,0.0016956907,6.2371595e-7,0.000005984876,0.000009786875,0.002170339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989876,0.000038248145,0.0004710975,0.00006898051,0.00029180496,0.00014225203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989412,0.000058809757,0.0004104552,0.00006881402,0.00030284756,0.00021788428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006967062,0.0000718219,0.00014118516,0.00007148834,0.0001327867,0.00016550165,0.0004664358,0.00004520952,0.00064353104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009187625,0.00006683759,0.00007290893,0.00005124833,0.00027340846,0.0010067831,0.000053213123,0.00012651697,0.00011194072],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002113103,0.000020293302,0.002377543,6.511288e-7,0.00004967445,0.0000067569913,0.0025015902,0.0006090129,0.000006655242,0.9907584,0.0035901081,0.000058135895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007629677,0.000037420188,0.00097317755,0.000012758623,0.000011146907,0.000039509032,0.0014417062,0.00008024215,0.0002921121,0.010440534,0.9858012,0.00010721387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015439447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02193642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9822111,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005357268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004483396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2567380311","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgw072","title":"Will the EU’s Proposal Concerning an Investment Court System for CETA and TTIP Lead to Enforceable Awards?—The Limits of Modifying the ICSID Convention and the Nature of Investment Arbitration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Convention; Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Investment (military); Settlement (finance); Dispute resolution; Business; Commission; Law; Investor-state dispute settlement; State (computer science); International trade; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; European union; Finance; Foreign direct investment; International investment; Politics","score_opus":0.02124291292193968,"score_gpt":0.2516574417351418,"score_spread":0.23041452881320212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2567380311","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.751432,0.0005678548,0.0040343343,0.16051286,0.0037906868,0.002575095,0.00007011491,0.000026150568,0.076990925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.982006,0.00003619226,0.00018276012,0.0167235,0.0007993817,0.000033546443,0.000007283536,0.000012012899,0.00019933749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874437,0.000051224004,0.0006807627,0.00013415665,0.00028039023,0.000109084795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979971,0.00025997296,0.0011489716,0.00013586353,0.00043963367,0.000018441753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015910704,0.00012963683,0.00020620384,0.00007989957,0.00021673537,0.00022243519,0.00040745214,0.000051812644,0.000023959416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010812852,0.00005418772,0.000111160574,0.000037249116,0.0003472558,0.0013488783,0.00007400396,0.00013911191,0.0000027896956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027890268,0.000021837765,0.00018408755,0.000038759896,0.00018523788,2.915119e-7,0.0002052776,0.0005033548,0.0014601389,0.996238,0.00077299715,0.00011113703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015487205,0.00061878684,0.003582781,0.0016639248,0.00069632096,0.0002072061,0.0054389196,0.20480064,0.023409046,0.18989798,0.55354005,0.0006571507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016229568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013282298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013468131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000838556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22097111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586163738","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgl045","title":"Book Survey 2006","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Normative; Publishing; Political science; Sovereignty; World trade; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Economics; International trade; Politics","score_opus":0.014104455035307861,"score_gpt":0.2952749272685979,"score_spread":0.28117047223329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586163738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063766114,0.0009258714,0.0016611252,0.041279882,0.010723242,0.00013035609,0.000050407256,0.000038248254,0.8814248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98620504,0.0001544398,0.00032213453,0.0031014187,0.001429364,1.2759475e-7,0.0000040716272,0.00000998262,0.008773416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908197,0.000060097096,0.00044609088,0.00006780571,0.000212407,0.00013160633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989835,0.00024328969,0.0003738574,0.000053001102,0.00023841271,0.000107910484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002128058,0.00005239609,0.00010670563,0.00009784413,0.00010337574,0.00008755437,0.0003782375,0.000044241988,0.00512583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015177774,0.00005274353,0.00006395143,0.000051638875,0.00014629081,0.0006105617,0.000018713567,0.00010569826,0.00019120309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039441267,0.00003977949,0.023574911,6.0181117e-7,0.00007647611,0.000013451027,0.00045199777,0.00013270584,0.000032542433,0.8566279,0.11876434,0.00024585077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025009364,0.000011085628,0.03200385,0.0000058239566,0.0000036952342,0.000013430264,0.000080535174,0.000006097095,0.00027233802,0.0005730444,0.9667223,0.000057686677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012801907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010098511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224389,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004725743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002011441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2609809460","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgx017","title":"Who Holds Influence over WTO Jurisprudence?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Health Services and Policy Research","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Salience (neuroscience); Verdict; Law; Meaning (existential); Political science; Affect (linguistics); Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Economics; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.011706944663183384,"score_gpt":0.32052328136885905,"score_spread":0.30881633670567565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609809460","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7178905,0.000034391323,0.000046315847,0.03748485,0.003035727,0.000059174145,0.000011093644,0.0000129173695,0.24142504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941615,0.00016676437,0.0002564609,0.0008176595,0.0013425396,6.176266e-7,5.141847e-7,0.000009928265,0.0032440443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990344,0.00003531493,0.0003985409,0.00010592218,0.00029035282,0.0001354591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985445,0.00007240742,0.0008486611,0.0001822107,0.00023054791,0.00012164005],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059428735,0.000074196745,0.000150133,0.00007147646,0.00048005453,0.0006065562,0.0012459953,0.000059633512,0.0018208628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028384672,0.00007312752,0.00009267396,0.000019493193,0.00041013976,0.002153814,0.00007777577,0.00014439998,0.00015341715],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013325171,0.00001982054,0.040176116,0.0000010999573,0.000058583846,0.000013891407,0.00061239913,0.00027268127,0.00008309695,0.9538371,0.0047010253,0.00021085898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048658391,0.000019350726,0.15915293,0.000047673224,0.00001131121,0.000019206685,0.000086356704,0.000050912044,0.0003922182,0.0066988165,0.8329163,0.00011834414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012002904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020476305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9471383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040232783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028548166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2619895480","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgx020","title":"The Data-Driven Future of International Economic Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.03566804010274248,"score_gpt":0.3295544472977674,"score_spread":0.2938864071950249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2619895480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02747253,0.0003864591,0.000023225135,0.041433766,0.01860776,0.00008930144,0.00030071835,0.000009837248,0.9116764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842361,0.0042327233,0.00035009615,0.0005704416,0.006675634,0.0000015054161,0.000016872908,0.000015526382,0.0039011082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984568,0.00007627437,0.00076049514,0.00018821502,0.0003500781,0.0001681906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997279,0.0002397564,0.0016220349,0.0004404582,0.00033315038,0.00008558413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012922894,0.00012254633,0.0002326455,0.000054740285,0.0008650157,0.0005543329,0.004423823,0.00005502378,0.0006071493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016669897,0.000093820825,0.00019202405,0.0000070774963,0.00093957986,0.0016336659,0.0005189525,0.00020933278,0.00014670429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007679334,0.000027704817,0.0019883548,0.0000011760645,0.0004636215,0.0000066448274,0.00030445372,0.00015870325,0.000014031224,0.9735908,0.022001715,0.0013660394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005087612,0.00003127654,0.0024799246,0.00003108165,0.000017781611,0.00001681153,0.00058300357,0.00048365144,0.00005578083,0.005423333,0.9902708,0.000097828095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019560375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014084001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96826905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045394912,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023610712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82206374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2806971698","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgy023","title":"Trade, Technology, and Transitions: Trampolines or Safety Nets for Displaced Workers?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Protectionism; Incentive; Economics; Conditionality; Comparative advantage; Convergence (economics); Trade barrier; International economics; International trade; Business; Labour economics; Market economy; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.014519499612140808,"score_gpt":0.3147024912393209,"score_spread":0.3001829916271801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2806971698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6841923,0.00023022637,0.01723464,0.25633368,0.0042910418,0.00047975502,0.00027888556,0.000055188728,0.03690429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931893,0.00022311653,0.002926703,0.0008328004,0.0009655241,0.0000037157963,0.0000045097668,0.000006661594,0.0018477181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994202,0.000020300737,0.0003219246,0.000074391595,0.00006919618,0.000093939496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995022,0.000095657866,0.00020044783,0.00003706694,0.00010446139,0.00006016172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036045292,0.000054902306,0.00011522073,0.00012475811,0.00018139226,0.000066463734,0.00017210477,0.00007659701,0.00031783938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000055231456,0.00004447244,0.00005906003,0.000054691256,0.00034577807,0.000297757,0.0000059854297,0.0000687639,0.0000033409494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046936184,0.000041949956,0.00061292486,0.0000029613404,0.00012555008,0.0000015682976,0.003986138,0.00008672364,0.00006371251,0.9847229,0.0060610045,0.0038251863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001162084,0.0001438384,0.00042636943,0.000039255257,0.000023432207,0.000036530637,0.004402952,0.0034067126,0.00005315001,0.010984228,0.97922754,0.00009389837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000055643948,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013969905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9737387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001304807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015984746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7795535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895276353","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgy038","title":"A Closer Look At WTO’s Third Pillar: How WTO Committees Influence Regional Trade Agreements","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pillar; Negotiation; International trade; Regional trade; Work (physics); World trade; Quarter (Canadian coin); Multilateral trade negotiations; International trade law; Business; Political science; International economics; Economics; Free trade; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.016188935684147223,"score_gpt":0.2762510606987064,"score_spread":0.2600621250145592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895276353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72329545,0.00009718673,0.000057861816,0.1749991,0.003006642,0.00016197404,0.000029383387,0.000035875677,0.09831653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878658,0.00016269897,0.00057622,0.0043931175,0.0023347943,0.0000016314028,0.0000053324206,0.000018211,0.004642187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843234,0.00010973312,0.000524982,0.00018368661,0.000516156,0.0002331002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985324,0.00014162458,0.00071212475,0.00014275842,0.0002879696,0.00018309336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000601922,0.00013825599,0.00021635798,0.00012812426,0.0003838305,0.00023989759,0.0008496346,0.000091090216,0.001831081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010898678,0.00013367055,0.00014086599,0.00008595004,0.0007309519,0.0011449987,0.00009223489,0.00017702038,0.00030274485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011363579,0.00011316022,0.041479994,0.0000046348227,0.00034801738,0.00002195722,0.0038058907,0.00014962319,0.0006777735,0.816381,0.13670461,0.0001997099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007632987,0.00007547934,0.020273883,0.00004546579,0.00002016685,0.00006403364,0.00039686245,0.000042507803,0.000797934,0.0029332673,0.9744202,0.00016691703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027749068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045928196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83771557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010707201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028248795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907939784","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgy048","title":"China’s Approach to the Belt and Road Initiative: Scope, Character and Sustainability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":63,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Normative; Political science; Beijing; Sustainability; Business; Law; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.01398490696670777,"score_gpt":0.3016722291955913,"score_spread":0.2876873222288835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907939784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7305938,0.00005310486,0.00051764766,0.035435922,0.001141946,0.00017566817,0.000018500905,0.0000056150734,0.2320578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955828,0.000080442056,0.00023963078,0.0012808784,0.00184012,0.0000033509955,0.0000026126509,0.0000043191317,0.00096580834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992722,0.00007798217,0.00026848973,0.000107593405,0.00017156515,0.000102141035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991884,0.00004938161,0.00022798714,0.000050535225,0.00040824062,0.000075431846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010544517,0.0000621211,0.00010055415,0.000058300975,0.00026099983,0.00018111126,0.00024079817,0.00003638913,0.00013053816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018293224,0.000045036886,0.00003750828,0.000026229962,0.00029000867,0.0005974353,0.000060803628,0.000103402366,0.000011661903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000636178,0.00003686193,0.002314978,0.0000025883103,0.00005800123,8.107243e-7,0.004521529,0.000019766918,0.000009729556,0.9881751,0.0013729141,0.003424123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006437887,0.00017154997,0.40708923,0.000033567554,0.000019383791,0.0000520785,0.0018645752,0.00070001587,0.00012783553,0.021717736,0.567406,0.00017424783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021867338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014104119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96645737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000297217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017553105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3305702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981418827","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgz041","title":"At the Vanishing Point of Law: Rebalancing, Non-Violation Claims, and the Role of the Multilateral Trade Regime in the Trade Wars","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Context (archaeology); Economics; Settlement (finance); International trade; International trade law; Law and economics; Point (geometry); Law; International economics; Political science","score_opus":0.004936512947831458,"score_gpt":0.2309043227803219,"score_spread":0.22596780983249046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981418827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8968284,0.00009167303,0.000004860662,0.07572579,0.00064995815,0.0002637386,0.0000100347215,0.0000024916023,0.026423074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985565,0.00006651893,0.000039441657,0.0009602258,0.00020548429,0.0000012567947,0.000001140284,0.000008060053,0.00016140113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870294,0.00026105397,0.0005584736,0.00008918929,0.00028430024,0.00010406145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856395,0.00045449508,0.0007762306,0.00014793137,0.000035583424,0.00002181996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015384575,0.00007560334,0.0001749332,0.000031159125,0.00016455696,0.00008053454,0.0006967783,0.000048871483,0.0001393185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051991705,0.000036617086,0.00011877229,0.00005956597,0.00044271667,0.00042808353,0.000053746033,0.00022463378,0.0000032112057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009623735,0.00003078155,0.0211033,0.0000038100288,0.000070201735,5.333761e-7,0.023505976,0.0017335924,0.0012748645,0.9516897,0.0003593321,0.00013163168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00919751,0.0001580927,0.5344422,0.00047805058,0.00016949953,0.00023528334,0.018198987,0.013358825,0.015061512,0.09716849,0.3110736,0.0004579983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013504619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035321256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8545213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022231684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008616641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20415033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006411047","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgz029","title":"Trumping Capacity Gap with Negotiation Strategies: the Mexican USMCA Negotiation Experience","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Relations in Latin America","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Blueprint; Dilemma; Politics; Political science; Developing country; Business; Economics; Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.020370757245082437,"score_gpt":0.3065573641310614,"score_spread":0.28618660688597897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006411047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66484886,0.000017542796,0.0032017797,0.0052075083,0.0022521291,0.00017081444,0.000006903988,0.000015105144,0.32427937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964509,0.000050504477,0.0014795946,0.00056304893,0.00079344114,0.000006086218,0.0000037633845,0.000011512196,0.0006411465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984583,0.00013094647,0.00053825404,0.00015134006,0.00055037765,0.0001707377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998012,0.00041525377,0.0009591615,0.00014118536,0.0004074015,0.000064968444],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007671155,0.000110196976,0.00016164551,0.00011336697,0.00027137296,0.0003095974,0.00065526756,0.00006274567,0.001869648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014945056,0.00008101571,0.00010938234,0.00009205058,0.00034946905,0.0018556343,0.00003053863,0.0002523899,0.00012216243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007584159,0.00002660316,0.009163383,0.0000016910994,0.00010762903,0.0000012989797,0.008915637,0.019272061,0.000097750875,0.96167475,0.00023163235,0.00043170378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003747524,0.0009507605,0.058067486,0.0004360333,0.00012714624,0.00027631834,0.0881531,0.03373013,0.0011103788,0.087759554,0.7245228,0.0011187487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015828719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010598418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8739152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009183883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046198428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012493081","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgaa001","title":"A Really Big Button That Doesn’t Do Anything? The Anti-NME Clause in US Trade Agreements Between Law and Geoeconomics","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Law; China; Political science; Business; Economics; Law and economics; International trade","score_opus":0.024718910785637965,"score_gpt":0.2685338866396907,"score_spread":0.24381497585405273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012493081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7909668,0.00007401033,0.00002987515,0.18071873,0.00094196096,0.00015244196,0.00004244208,0.000013457856,0.027060268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891939,0.00035897337,0.00016275846,0.0089158015,0.0012939945,0.0000010216842,0.000004347489,0.000016730311,0.000052479485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870855,0.00011082907,0.0006010494,0.00018013496,0.00021566688,0.00018375849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896544,0.00019302004,0.0005529918,0.000088543144,0.000038808776,0.00016121907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074176944,0.000119264856,0.00025407693,0.00007078501,0.00017428373,0.00034257074,0.00061465666,0.000078508536,0.0002481888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052507363,0.000100119796,0.000080087586,0.00005333505,0.00030116487,0.00072483247,0.00007821734,0.0002803792,0.000023684197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046633093,0.000044593387,0.19101553,0.000007248484,0.00024423504,0.000022690127,0.00765824,0.00062278355,0.00008146336,0.7984771,0.0012027556,0.00057673396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021010516,0.000086467604,0.19414018,0.00006506139,0.000054678647,0.000028957073,0.0015495197,0.00021129064,0.00040862343,0.008401018,0.7926514,0.00030170582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011823678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005164984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7914487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039888654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017454283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40827668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3156856961","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgab011","title":"Investor Obligations in Special Economic Zones: Legal Status, Typology, and Functional Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Economic Zones and Regional Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Legal status; Law and economics; Economic analysis; Business; Economics; Public economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Classical economics","score_opus":0.02181310906916617,"score_gpt":0.22326526708231437,"score_spread":0.2014521580131482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3156856961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9086742,0.0010191331,0.00043237986,0.0064635705,0.005452575,0.00006886201,0.00026109396,0.000006278786,0.07762193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909936,0.0015902665,0.0024338178,0.00089991104,0.0019691554,0.0000041525363,0.000081412974,0.000018694202,0.0020089662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799687,0.000022053224,0.0013918568,0.00033095182,0.00003825049,0.00022001858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987297,0.000106831096,0.00081682677,0.0001374209,0.000063952495,0.00014525234],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000506437,0.00015511391,0.0005689149,0.00065273326,0.00006664006,0.00013936621,0.00018003029,0.00010678297,0.0034254165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000412068,0.0001792668,0.00027082913,0.000098701305,0.00014384408,0.0006514525,0.00009107537,0.0002143123,0.00026001182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003690519,0.00005464848,0.1514724,0.0000033331128,0.0007874248,0.000022598722,0.00009923839,0.005315246,0.000004792695,0.83967793,0.0024401862,0.000085274594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017712257,0.00004667245,0.36569968,0.000017959812,0.000052934956,0.00025771945,0.00038807656,0.0030150919,0.00004538779,0.08327095,0.54510456,0.000329722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075106486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003713559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.756407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010672499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032301253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162806500","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgab024","title":"Recalibrating the WTO Dispute Settlement System: Towards New Standards of Appellate Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"World trade; Agency (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Standard of review; Law; Product (mathematics); Political science; Law and economics; Process (computing); Business; International trade; Economics; Judicial review; Sociology; Finance","score_opus":0.014907703443511566,"score_gpt":0.30655194191409973,"score_spread":0.2916442384705882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162806500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065388526,0.012730995,0.006080086,0.5376056,0.009566071,0.00049452746,0.00038223178,0.000044162807,0.42655748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984568,0.0063056103,0.0015662739,0.002513412,0.0018181647,0.0000012244092,0.000011272824,0.000020466046,0.003195566],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998405,0.00016684704,0.0007613713,0.00009294882,0.0004705144,0.0001033279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849725,0.00010234516,0.00077718054,0.00011263497,0.00042404307,0.00008657553],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014382553,0.00007300202,0.00023849185,0.000029386465,0.0001120425,0.00010492117,0.0004213844,0.000028677483,0.0021750215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019833588,0.000053949316,0.00014423557,0.00008767302,0.00009602655,0.00033842836,0.000061029863,0.0001116884,0.000012489214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009198306,0.000016409018,0.00033309872,0.00008239696,0.00019522438,0.000010716829,0.0005983272,0.00044506622,0.000053655374,0.9635002,0.032993957,0.0017617667],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031632133,0.00001659828,0.0001728144,0.0010924609,0.000052627413,0.00004827845,0.00067062845,0.00008458231,0.0016418447,0.0009988372,0.99482894,0.000076042576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002601757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00068006304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97802913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064581586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011997401,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206963000","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgac001","title":"Straining the Spaghetti Bowl: Re-Evaluating the Regulation of Preferential Rules of Origin","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"St Catharine's College, University of Cambridge","keywords":"Protectionism; International trade; Rules of origin; Discretion; International economics; Economics; Free trade; Regional trade; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06081756584403263,"score_gpt":0.3480510280477309,"score_spread":0.2872334622036983,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206963000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9368363,0.000053674357,0.00010223175,0.024213959,0.0016120124,0.00012922483,0.00003672059,0.000006030847,0.037009817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99844444,0.00001437073,0.00038120427,0.000119919656,0.00056055567,0.0000018922302,0.000004312101,0.0000077740615,0.00046555354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985097,0.00027646802,0.00059316994,0.000069377566,0.0004706753,0.00008062079],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817747,0.00033029835,0.001195578,0.00008129558,0.00019280246,0.000022565493],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002219564,0.000051959723,0.00012290486,0.00006201249,0.00032307656,0.000047804675,0.0006246259,0.000018927065,0.0041447734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014330764,0.000037097598,0.00009794444,0.00006427732,0.00023494456,0.0002649967,0.00007356164,0.00016789047,0.0000031778038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046799847,0.000026766664,0.0010898166,0.0000020394175,0.00010773953,2.096379e-7,0.0042957165,0.018645545,0.0012083253,0.97306097,0.0007755061,0.00074055855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0040442175,0.0007967903,0.10971791,0.00018357867,0.00033060714,0.00009302963,0.03313314,0.017646868,0.0070295655,0.15024301,0.6762467,0.0005345888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036527202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003432163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.822818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002681347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003274456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99676555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210455292","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgac008","title":"The Strategies of the International Chamber of Commerce to Eliminate Double Taxation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"European Political History Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"League; Context (archaeology); Macro; International taxation; Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Tax reform; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.025585736623052118,"score_gpt":0.24332366342799924,"score_spread":0.21773792680494714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210455292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36113313,0.00005607764,0.000021463153,0.010289685,0.0038303195,0.00007033782,0.00008310074,0.0000033229464,0.62451255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885456,0.000009715352,0.000015905074,0.00052425417,0.000398535,0.0000028610336,0.0000031134512,0.000007630002,0.010492363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989665,0.00005723255,0.00057721685,0.00006283423,0.00026434273,0.00007187295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984744,0.0001332677,0.0009898968,0.00012427365,0.00025082746,0.000027298724],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052187114,0.000061088336,0.00012712415,0.00008049575,0.00021397231,0.00007281238,0.0006841108,0.0000076363385,0.0026644035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031707943,0.000039936207,0.00018839628,0.000015454267,0.00023221514,0.00024123624,0.00017973752,0.00014811812,0.000015030003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011233463,0.00004153666,0.00007740571,0.0000022808179,0.00018361004,0.0000010899449,0.0022262936,0.0057132947,0.0001340235,0.9845352,0.00689193,0.00008096037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042986067,0.00009348545,0.00057182496,0.000016388101,0.000036828013,0.000021913504,0.0048474283,0.00050351094,0.00059944164,0.0075751008,0.9852441,0.000060110444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037438064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00074169104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002664284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008356695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242979611","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgp007","title":"Introduction to Volume 12, 2009","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International economic law; Law; Competence (human resources); Political science; Settlement (finance); International law; Economics; Management; Finance; Public international law","score_opus":0.012122383306252118,"score_gpt":0.2101305234563079,"score_spread":0.19800814015005577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242979611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26070967,0.00002550561,0.0011348475,0.069312334,0.011014682,0.00014414836,0.000009416208,0.000040119205,0.6576093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9236743,0.00002016972,0.00095031166,0.042022116,0.02607631,0.000003726256,0.000021586662,0.000018431458,0.007213084],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899864,0.0000046031937,0.00053510786,0.0001298776,0.00022399622,0.000107802836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991137,0.000010977174,0.00044987278,0.00008419949,0.00031796168,0.000023289009],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025226848,0.00009971721,0.00014160071,0.00027399595,0.0000917954,0.0001419979,0.00032739737,0.00003177549,0.0044018854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059253958,0.00009253625,0.00012237557,0.000043338066,0.000048892736,0.0019936804,0.000052791176,0.00010989916,0.002674594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008028414,0.00005524433,0.0013895289,0.0000023820194,0.000062426014,0.0000120108825,0.000019106013,0.0016132373,0.00036921652,0.62864125,0.36766177,0.00009353407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004262722,0.000025083638,0.002906372,0.0000091133115,0.00000894025,0.00013322459,0.000016035408,0.0021876371,0.00029325057,0.003280868,0.9906085,0.00010469475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016270354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000712017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6629646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019876755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040337043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99810195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250938690","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgv037","title":"JIEL Debate: Transformative Transatlantic Free Trade Agreements?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership; Political science; Democracy; Negotiation; General partnership; Civil society; Free trade; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Politics; International trade; Political economy; Public administration; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.023070527928829677,"score_gpt":0.28293954523682,"score_spread":0.25986901730799034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250938690","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11952135,0.00019279296,0.003981155,0.2791094,0.007716595,0.0003410816,0.000091003254,0.000061073166,0.58898556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681336,0.00010468925,0.0007678123,0.0009488546,0.0008609151,0.0000010788009,0.0000044614194,0.000011794371,0.00048702126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987502,0.0000854878,0.0005527556,0.000086464875,0.00036934143,0.00015575893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999184,0.000075698896,0.0003241253,0.000082750965,0.00012802127,0.00020538323],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071244966,0.00009076137,0.00017713303,0.00010670115,0.00010082272,0.00013422681,0.00070413627,0.000056726,0.0009808652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000751416,0.00008547936,0.000112237765,0.000064300526,0.00018258039,0.0012288756,0.00001257747,0.00015017456,0.000080131606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073624426,0.00010857494,0.001198972,0.000003460992,0.00024543676,0.000022398439,0.0150874285,0.0006666366,0.000055317676,0.9544817,0.02740717,0.0006492624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026086448,0.00008553343,0.0012525955,0.000036734957,0.00004222631,0.00007474687,0.0030488267,0.0001939042,0.000903936,0.012468916,0.9791011,0.00018280082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003427507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018163775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95169395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005650855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037544244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283808068","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgac017","title":"Racializing Trade in Corn: México Fights <i>Maíz</i> Imports and GMOs","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; International trade; International trade law; Capitalism; International law; Market access; Sovereignty; Political science; Economics; Law; Geography; Agriculture; Politics","score_opus":0.014104080721958036,"score_gpt":0.2481791154362376,"score_spread":0.23407503471427957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283808068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.970466,0.00010441818,0.0000054368043,0.0041087735,0.0017076121,0.000088516135,0.000012377239,0.000008516632,0.023498308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99587214,0.0000205911,0.00001693187,0.0028500871,0.0011768824,0.0000024453823,0.000007232248,0.000009933696,0.00004375166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904865,0.000017452538,0.0004971623,0.00011803286,0.00016708582,0.00015163887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993924,0.000038471997,0.00045844953,0.00005549702,0.000035039495,0.000020123907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057954184,0.00009742835,0.0002030091,0.00016101185,0.00014119974,0.00020201596,0.00023970111,0.000029314193,0.00029600612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045294608,0.00009705569,0.00010736717,0.00006011486,0.000051138228,0.0011089811,0.000116789066,0.00020995334,0.000003361514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004096753,0.00044501194,0.42910296,0.000073022056,0.0002151117,0.00037859436,0.0015535689,0.0033234241,0.00008251972,0.5531764,0.008891082,0.002348627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004570268,0.000117816504,0.24059105,0.0000718229,0.000093247836,0.0003064764,0.010461926,0.0030705358,0.0000380313,0.14107327,0.5989886,0.00061693636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006895482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032250193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59009755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046667326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006242339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3957816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286697356","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgac025","title":"Racial Capitalism and International Economic Law: Introduction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Labor and Employment Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Racism; Capitalism; Oppression; Sociology; Politics; Scholarship; Premise; Law; Political economy; Political science; Gender studies; Epistemology","score_opus":0.011943490006568275,"score_gpt":0.2854267259278502,"score_spread":0.2734832359212819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286697356","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51780677,0.00017979459,0.00006324834,0.06469871,0.037831523,0.00018176291,0.0002965142,0.000036225243,0.37890542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836163,0.0001920573,0.000197305,0.001511889,0.00863223,0.0000102720305,0.000038781454,0.000016536438,0.0057846652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849284,0.00011397026,0.0006193791,0.00021407146,0.00037634245,0.00018339558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898887,0.00009254444,0.00055585563,0.00008612943,0.00016468951,0.000111892354],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011041443,0.00012181812,0.00019446776,0.00018752129,0.00049713196,0.00024307225,0.0006786172,0.00004993917,0.0077674156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004005256,0.00013522152,0.00015177997,0.000023635177,0.00026958334,0.0011155001,0.00018055552,0.00027663898,0.000066144035],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014441501,0.000052954976,0.0005061974,9.416208e-7,0.00020393725,0.000009749989,0.0014549814,0.0019457511,0.00007094708,0.98338157,0.011724308,0.0005042701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007306102,0.00009040977,0.00022134173,0.0000042585953,0.0000174736,0.00011723056,0.0009943026,0.0003231793,0.00009180577,0.025313543,0.9719515,0.00014435148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036716862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037829143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9602272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019192381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024199195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9931396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4309765515","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgac044","title":"Main Act or Side Show? Model Agreements by International Institutions and Their Reuse in Investment Treaty Texts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Treaty; Investment (military); Institution; Convention; International trade; International law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.02798418143959592,"score_gpt":0.24990477681635936,"score_spread":0.22192059537676345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4309765515","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5543339,0.00008610652,0.00030133183,0.02045514,0.003539131,0.00030357917,0.0002634391,0.000027295991,0.42069003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9659333,0.000057440124,0.00033548457,0.030990617,0.0006731233,0.000030064719,0.00013703786,0.000018056724,0.0018248357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985497,0.000020303141,0.00074378063,0.0002150517,0.0003114988,0.00015964142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990689,0.000046428628,0.00060753094,0.00013608295,0.000109033455,0.000032022537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047899026,0.00018155556,0.00021000055,0.00042720238,0.00017088396,0.00026998963,0.0007721958,0.000035601905,0.0013207551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006698497,0.00015114891,0.00010987753,0.00007322494,0.000089686946,0.0020321715,0.00043136234,0.0002522253,0.000031017116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005168401,0.00043573254,0.0014920443,0.0000074982736,0.0002609879,0.00003479629,0.00018080354,0.022044962,0.0010615923,0.9312755,0.04242476,0.00026449552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034624035,0.00007000543,0.00075366057,0.000046255867,0.000024089728,0.00013676444,0.00039841543,0.12595004,0.0002861646,0.054013953,0.8145513,0.0003069655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032960036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006168281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8772615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091185275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017075763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313729324","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgac057","title":"Trade Agreements and Sustainability: Exploring the Potential of Global Value Chain (GVC) Obligations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Global trade, sustainability, and social impact","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Academy; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Sustainability; Enforcement; Business; Legitimacy; Value (mathematics); Certification; International trade; Stipulation; Corporate governance; European union; Global value chain; Economics; International economics; Law; Comparative advantage; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.023277176932834168,"score_gpt":0.2692048001442113,"score_spread":0.24592762321137712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313729324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98168445,0.00002851732,0.00008353432,0.012949568,0.001401315,0.00013644487,0.000020271165,0.000015251753,0.0036806727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99832153,0.00004262251,0.000016327776,0.00041619962,0.0011568696,0.0000034978364,0.000005852767,0.000007279236,0.000029828765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989365,0.000021596694,0.0005220473,0.00011551544,0.00022428152,0.00018010795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991789,0.000056565506,0.00043280097,0.00009681264,0.00021215972,0.000022767334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008001996,0.00010484637,0.00019026133,0.00009534096,0.00014575837,0.00020631943,0.0003325268,0.000033988574,0.000028189452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022979354,0.000083303275,0.00016624854,0.00015886959,0.00016606366,0.0012712731,0.0001267291,0.00010522201,0.0000054299226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007281448,0.000102334954,0.08317461,0.00009354224,0.00029610156,0.00002009455,0.00043851277,0.011959332,0.000019873232,0.900692,0.0010873146,0.0020434905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012649759,0.000046161033,0.66386616,0.000049978276,0.00012869535,0.000021103295,0.018857688,0.009566927,0.000013825204,0.29458973,0.01140213,0.0001926295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010034136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000105354404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6061022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045622763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010699629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3397009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390829628","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgad036","title":"Contradictions and tensions in the way the USMCA regulates energy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Externality; Arbitration; Energy (signal processing); Sustainability; Energy policy; Business; Natural resource; Resource (disambiguation); Energy sector; Dispute resolution; Energy law; Resolution (logic); Law and economics; Environmental law; Economics; Economic system; Political science; Law; Microeconomics; Renewable energy; Engineering","score_opus":0.017111166576178387,"score_gpt":0.22167913146601434,"score_spread":0.20456796488983595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390829628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4951116,0.0001064305,0.000051108454,0.14711876,0.003328849,0.00013444344,0.000009625416,0.000032133375,0.35410702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97184366,0.00008484429,0.000011581502,0.026446126,0.0012048391,0.00000519168,0.000010597678,0.0000059851877,0.0003871964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993494,0.000012711679,0.00034030748,0.00007109325,0.00014281564,0.00008364367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943453,0.0001449687,0.0002466947,0.00006716772,0.000099791454,0.000006851484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049238285,0.00006634302,0.000084425934,0.00017206623,0.0001321612,0.00026148197,0.00030127616,0.000022673537,0.00017711397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042945332,0.000037607955,0.000069178306,0.000080987265,0.00009324775,0.0007626196,0.000043161162,0.000104445746,0.00007062462],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016798238,0.000016717948,0.00064350356,0.0000010625422,0.000039154933,0.000007168269,0.000042868185,0.00041900668,0.000064099106,0.97470903,0.023945775,0.00009481574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054320187,0.000013375306,0.021055331,0.000024813447,0.000017382725,0.00007552503,0.00035727187,0.023018803,0.00003975142,0.08512027,0.8696622,0.00007202567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041211286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006717507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8895888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045238114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016750819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25214767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391886407","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgae004","title":"Compliance politics and international investment disputes: a new dataset","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"Norges Forskningsråd","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Politics; Investment (military); Business; Law and economics; International investment; Political science; Foreign direct investment; Economics; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.038299860976551615,"score_gpt":0.2814392999099588,"score_spread":0.2431394389334072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391886407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023991542,0.0010898564,0.0034680837,0.09266682,0.02449945,0.0003193177,0.0006726096,0.00012309702,0.8531692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88477784,0.0002471151,0.0020044907,0.09529961,0.012528301,0.0000057338752,0.00082145486,0.000046009674,0.004269447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989359,0.00000478353,0.0005416877,0.00017505304,0.0002206194,0.000121994424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941534,0.00005149808,0.00028016148,0.000084310304,0.00012782606,0.00004087788],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002210592,0.00013739461,0.00014627288,0.00026041846,0.000054821176,0.000900259,0.00042433193,0.00003691732,0.0013436311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036511243,0.000120786506,0.00009027165,0.000038905615,0.00009132105,0.0026201308,0.00013324303,0.00015452536,0.00043404632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018464536,0.000028560642,0.00024805753,0.000016945749,0.00018290963,0.00002042911,0.000020169231,0.00011055091,0.000052429863,0.8767657,0.12230194,0.0002338048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044688617,0.000013727926,0.0004433413,0.00012560838,0.000025473128,0.00010646628,0.000025704787,0.027252924,0.000041827807,0.071651176,0.89974886,0.000117988915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034790183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000086036904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8607863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022680398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009569963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392092890","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgae007","title":"Border carbon adjustment compliance and the WTO: the interactional evolution of law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"World Trade Organization Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Law; Business; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.014538397749513553,"score_gpt":0.3115287732785724,"score_spread":0.2969903755290589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392092890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17416507,0.0063896985,0.00057655486,0.3575996,0.01817173,0.00045493824,0.000050966933,0.00003992854,0.44255152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975413,0.00023053546,0.000061269406,0.00043995847,0.0009359342,0.0000020151394,9.5127854e-7,0.0000064714095,0.0007815602],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991837,0.000095761825,0.0003608436,0.0000766716,0.00021232813,0.00007067367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912673,0.000401799,0.00024313634,0.0000592057,0.00013867917,0.000030442658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006419449,0.000058180427,0.00011101442,0.00004033651,0.00012447505,0.00011494999,0.0002811717,0.000025807412,0.00045428867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043298525,0.000034643155,0.00007571167,0.00004443239,0.0006539888,0.0003426118,0.00003502093,0.00015345929,0.000009139158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037640406,0.000013756473,0.00022442672,0.0000037787688,0.00012622762,7.542815e-7,0.00092080724,0.00033411136,0.000032869037,0.9975058,0.00063766487,0.00016216368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009839822,0.000038025362,0.005163748,0.0001758189,0.00006950236,0.00008935018,0.0013674619,0.005610845,0.00020140373,0.049574494,0.93662065,0.00010473112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015556641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029166401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9479313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046790024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014836315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49741423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398168691","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgae017","title":"Discourses of ISDS reform: a comparison of UNCITRAL Working Group III and ICSID processes","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Mormonism, Religion, and History","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; McGill University; University of Calgary; Université de Montréal","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Group (periodic table); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.029883679144264715,"score_gpt":0.26711666979205595,"score_spread":0.23723299064779124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398168691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77516425,0.009515549,0.00006772851,0.0007206234,0.0030809247,0.000053574367,0.00003970315,0.000010896674,0.21134675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99735755,0.0004958145,0.00007366283,0.000041798365,0.00080108066,9.046141e-7,0.0000036502533,0.000009003902,0.0012165161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991739,0.000007514728,0.00056388834,0.00007448374,0.00011480798,0.00006543052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938184,0.00005198573,0.00038528175,0.00004236282,0.00010707621,0.00003147892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016592156,0.00007534562,0.00023351384,0.00013492089,0.000051265484,0.00008870717,0.00014909377,0.000024148445,0.00027855267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005414848,0.000057847377,0.000095517724,0.000008675416,0.00025359736,0.00035275533,0.000021623406,0.00010834416,0.0000026395378],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000951299,0.00006420108,0.00055262016,0.00013525583,0.00023205702,0.0000040787427,0.013740856,0.000050446728,0.00007414297,0.98058367,0.0034022753,0.0010652778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006475999,0.00033542662,0.00025395546,0.0008942208,0.00010176364,0.000055689863,0.0054872576,0.00077511405,0.00073304126,0.012994848,0.977553,0.00016804654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058382546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026482109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9741508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015843632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011323443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30499563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406227963","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgae054","title":"Global justice in the reshaping of international tax","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Corporate Taxation and Avoidance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Technocracy; Decentralization; Normative; Economics; Economic Justice; Pillar; Tax policy; International taxation; Law and economics; Tax reform; Public economics; Political science; Political economy; Law; Neoclassical economics; Market economy; Politics","score_opus":0.02109140326009737,"score_gpt":0.2665310060311358,"score_spread":0.2454396027710384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406227963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52520126,0.0009042871,0.0014377867,0.035798706,0.015223203,0.00013303196,0.00004880982,0.000024484865,0.42122844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99332523,0.00004137598,0.00012279332,0.0038306531,0.00250106,0.000001320443,0.000006467702,0.000005292985,0.00016579244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991418,0.000008164,0.000500701,0.00008730457,0.00019305611,0.0000689905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922603,0.000067379035,0.00049814547,0.00006027969,0.00014261607,0.000005575335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061824813,0.00006888187,0.00010562541,0.00016778782,0.000024045527,0.00029686748,0.00050737255,0.000024720883,0.0005154935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076473465,0.000051768115,0.00009715339,0.00010362084,0.000045223216,0.0011761943,0.000059349313,0.000115240815,0.000091223614],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057880232,0.000037935195,0.005844848,0.00003905245,0.0000686659,0.000040983938,0.000050470073,0.0031764968,0.000081782644,0.95972896,0.029232197,0.0016407036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005339559,0.0000095430805,0.010889263,0.00023751294,0.000038683214,0.000081408594,0.00039588887,0.028203739,0.000029284138,0.025052562,0.93442684,0.00010131531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002465361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004549976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9346764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016093526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052199546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5644293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414727554","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgaf028","title":"Hortatory language in EU Comprehensive Air Transport Agreements—when Darwin met strategy","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"International Law and Aviation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pillar; Air transport; Liberalization; European union; Aviation; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.013297525292101828,"score_gpt":0.3118935618904183,"score_spread":0.29859603659831646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414727554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66364,0.00010962102,0.00016849303,0.0032099846,0.0017692612,0.00009430854,0.00003771718,0.000008060014,0.3309625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949843,0.0000721312,0.00024040134,0.0014197727,0.00038524412,0.0000026556595,0.000017300457,0.000005088509,0.0028730761],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998893,0.000068779795,0.0005568608,0.00011247993,0.0002407284,0.00012813874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929726,0.00010003424,0.00030792176,0.00005714503,0.00019005097,0.000047578746],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047133325,0.00008334409,0.00017680542,0.00020772533,0.00007215709,0.000040634248,0.00039661935,0.00006196087,0.0010259711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021751592,0.00008382296,0.00012437058,0.000040150255,0.00009622375,0.0005327129,0.000015693982,0.00016516763,0.00002889751],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007856342,0.00007564977,0.008597952,0.000004620803,0.000178591,0.00003891887,0.0019889227,0.0016304319,0.00025846338,0.9840902,0.0017357798,0.0013219197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033756397,0.00014181422,0.13602561,0.0002765764,0.00006065801,0.000015246487,0.011581918,0.00045462832,0.0015045338,0.038303927,0.80789,0.0003694236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005110599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014342083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94578624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063350354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036985998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998872},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417453629","doi":"10.1093/jiel/jgaf045","title":"The sticky, muddled geopolitics of sustainable finance regulation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Economic Law","topic":"Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Stephen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Geopolitics; Sustainability; Corporate governance; Sustainable development; Capital (architecture); Financial crisis; Climate Finance; Financial market","score_opus":0.007721272212013542,"score_gpt":0.2250496447935775,"score_spread":0.21732837258156396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417453629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63898945,0.0039639976,0.0049488577,0.0058410997,0.0037550987,0.00025837484,0.000070718816,0.000010813759,0.3421616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701796,0.00048901077,0.00030540762,0.00024553217,0.000201603,0.0000049352907,0.0000030130586,0.000009255656,0.028561648],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842423,0.000012121256,0.0011573209,0.00013522935,0.000044819044,0.00022628624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804425,0.00019568313,0.0012007715,0.000218034,0.00031531244,0.000025928068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090094766,0.00010115755,0.00031819343,0.00023524828,0.00013380092,0.00008864674,0.00051946094,0.00006993427,0.00012535119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021929607,0.00009304298,0.00018354875,0.000100791025,0.00015317426,0.00046125712,0.00008240717,0.00014393392,0.00003016264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072372066,0.000033341203,0.005743835,0.000016443648,0.00011519905,0.000005612604,0.000065601926,0.0021148466,0.0000018336942,0.98697495,0.004607311,0.00024863763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000604451,0.000047258287,0.009771505,0.00002716808,0.000007226033,0.000008794186,0.00036288644,0.001898232,0.0002437287,0.57144386,0.41551256,0.00007233564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036804305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042828167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41553113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053296133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018760111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37941825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}