{"meta":{"query_hash":"89fe768115ba","filters":{"venue":"Journal of International Political Theory"},"cohort_total":34,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"exported":34,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/89fe768115ba","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+International+Political+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1983906571","doi":"10.1177/1755088214555597","title":"Drone warfare and the limits of sacrifice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Violence, Religion, and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Biopower; Drone; Politics; Revolution in Military Affairs; Political science; Militarization; Political economy; State (computer science); State of exception; Citizenship; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Military science; History","score_opus":0.05126544717323265,"score_gpt":0.2837875246610274,"score_spread":0.23252207748779477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983906571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13079043,0.0021093944,0.0002093445,0.012178877,0.0020384446,0.00007446303,0.000045743083,0.000008489959,0.85254484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964428,0.00007017151,0.000030288385,0.00096889207,0.0017690858,6.229851e-7,0.0000010221178,0.0000057897005,0.00071135454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990805,0.00011683552,0.00033307055,0.0000490996,0.0003164753,0.000104049024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867964,0.00040187268,0.00016127412,0.00006550261,0.0005757276,0.00011597323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078400155,0.00006627608,0.00015920411,0.000072883755,0.000046257956,0.00004769238,0.0002174443,0.000024062156,0.00016581923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004251504,0.000036622034,0.00009721996,0.0000113068845,0.00068451394,0.00013514809,0.000024929213,0.0001487308,0.0000111055115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038196438,0.000044136348,0.00009961247,0.0000063463226,0.00007782847,0.000004307469,0.0024431,0.0000019979411,0.000005617456,0.99534035,0.001363847,0.00023089656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009308057,0.00011498981,0.000095397714,0.000067187015,0.000033792647,0.00005007999,0.002397715,0.000028502061,0.00009086711,0.9455919,0.05055259,0.00004615765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025582278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000020827317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8656523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023583243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000044811677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25221202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985248823","doi":"10.3366/e1755088210000479","title":"An Ethnography of Migrant ‘Illegality’ in Sweden: Included Yet Excepted?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Ethnography; Phenomenology (philosophy); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Politics; Lived experience; Gender studies; Precarity; Embodied cognition; Immigration; Political science; Criminology; Migrant workers; Critical ethnography; Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.022699401233484684,"score_gpt":0.37926059524287137,"score_spread":0.3565611940093867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985248823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572302,0.0000449805,0.0008041491,0.002052882,0.0013622463,0.00007634456,0.000017256836,0.000009679743,0.038402244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788636,0.000028792372,0.0006386753,0.00038337114,0.000822376,0.0000018410291,0.000006070073,0.000007088175,0.0002254325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997786,0.00045016932,0.000700711,0.000106070904,0.00072437775,0.00023268958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819136,0.00041457024,0.000300198,0.0001196585,0.00076026836,0.00021397788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002983869,0.00009342044,0.00021105722,0.00042805204,0.00008178971,0.000055723154,0.00049884256,0.00015322532,0.0009076796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019846463,0.000074946474,0.00018487891,0.0002035176,0.0004758572,0.00058877165,0.000018257162,0.00046871087,0.000005478286],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011035482,0.00026474483,0.008670981,0.0000036191543,0.000029802595,0.0000044645262,0.0065148254,0.000003622062,0.0071343863,0.97602713,0.00034447035,0.00089160196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009974708,0.00032994573,0.06157176,0.00012440402,0.000030817915,0.000028534043,0.013664036,0.00016529941,0.006343177,0.84753054,0.06897324,0.00024074674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082015496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003273669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12849656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008291789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023421664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023347283","doi":"10.1177/1755088215573092","title":"Theorizing state civil disobedience in international politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Power (physics); Law; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Civil society; Order (exchange); Political philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023932406860924276,"score_gpt":0.3473827315028335,"score_spread":0.3234503246419092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023347283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42853534,0.00018205216,0.0040172366,0.018176608,0.0058065713,0.00009516814,0.00005047606,0.000025476005,0.5431111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959153,0.000091821494,0.0003825027,0.0011888144,0.0012143798,9.2837183e-7,0.0000029589157,0.0000080917425,0.0011952131],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755067,0.00032032176,0.00053018733,0.00011492134,0.0010426905,0.00044123453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807584,0.00045435745,0.00019839035,0.00008053847,0.00074538623,0.00044549842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028411245,0.00010119527,0.00017615058,0.00025806448,0.0000613168,0.00012410116,0.00080742064,0.00007335594,0.00014793315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044375174,0.00009095199,0.00011875631,0.00013607305,0.0003990692,0.0005831638,0.000101004196,0.00035094665,0.000030477364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071305374,0.00012395596,0.008694942,0.0000014873991,0.000032657226,0.00007159409,0.0043748217,0.00007103376,0.000009614213,0.9856257,0.00044477565,0.0004781535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005599427,0.000054505166,0.0017262596,0.000061228464,0.0000072462967,0.000036639904,0.013646768,0.00031089786,0.000015649246,0.9283676,0.055100292,0.00011293119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003381947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002764173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56737995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008170952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044070062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53124434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029974543","doi":"10.3366/e1755088209000317","title":"Political Friendship among Peoples","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of St Andrews","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Political philosophy; Political science; Duty; Sociology; Political economy; Equity (law); Law; Social psychology; Law and economics; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03654066236211519,"score_gpt":0.36806890168715556,"score_spread":0.3315282393250404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029974543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05077312,0.000055747994,0.001509748,0.07522156,0.0010375095,0.000047033405,0.000014410594,0.000030516507,0.87131035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870217,0.000010119996,0.00029270878,0.007818371,0.0043775197,5.744884e-7,0.00000143065,0.000008160191,0.00046941463],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996986,0.00048865424,0.0005620367,0.00012845005,0.0010306179,0.00080426637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959854,0.00216585,0.00014518577,0.00011331214,0.0005739352,0.0010163133],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021788322,0.00012739665,0.00023920328,0.00019086442,0.0001949549,0.00011284339,0.00064628816,0.00020416295,0.00052410946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009996039,0.000107880536,0.00028693638,0.00011193606,0.0010504304,0.00046914435,0.00003472141,0.0006589114,0.000040332514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075489574,0.00016387059,0.00086551416,0.0000027726887,0.000037530728,0.000051410872,0.0004618317,9.764137e-7,0.000014100639,0.99780595,0.0002498967,0.00027066722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024979282,0.00012781598,0.0088401465,0.000058451264,0.000026477135,0.000035891742,0.002516002,0.0000069037033,0.00018507606,0.9805543,0.0072788917,0.00012029574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005988309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000086588725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9362486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000358772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041599874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834317},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074862659","doi":"10.1177/1755088214555596","title":"Scapegoat racism and the sacrificial politics of “security”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Violence, Religion, and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scapegoat; Racism; Politics; Sociology; Race (biology); Persecution; Security studies; Criminology; Gender studies; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.0258869274908025,"score_gpt":0.26463936262980353,"score_spread":0.23875243513900102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074862659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.214297,0.0015028348,0.00018012608,0.008144985,0.0030410932,0.00009340436,0.0000771987,0.000009985561,0.7726534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436665,0.000053004842,0.000024778457,0.0011609959,0.0039691227,6.757531e-7,0.0000014361999,0.000007773889,0.00041555826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874,0.00016291413,0.0004593388,0.000061135645,0.00041827216,0.00015829649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838895,0.00047930068,0.00020599,0.00008054453,0.0006806858,0.00016456058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093081413,0.0000891544,0.0002137718,0.00011241358,0.00007594921,0.00007060091,0.00026474844,0.000036497717,0.00017491958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00053493335,0.0000523484,0.00014747924,0.000014400188,0.0011103604,0.00015560375,0.000043835626,0.00020454866,0.000011707316],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002863739,0.000060073897,0.00007043334,0.0000072840608,0.000080845566,0.000006210027,0.0055187754,0.0000011622656,0.0000034309207,0.9927287,0.0011133621,0.00012334264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009943007,0.00010394563,0.00003408606,0.00005333909,0.000043682383,0.000088439505,0.0031862136,0.000048406437,0.00008062278,0.9563186,0.03899022,0.000058115085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040633186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001983361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78006965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037531623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008700778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4091169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079501509","doi":"10.3366/e175508821000042x","title":"Kant, International Law, and the Problem of Humanitarian Intervention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Humanitarian intervention; Responsibility to protect; Principle of legality; Law; Intervention (counseling); Coercion (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; International law; Politics; Security dilemma; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.007495935423929406,"score_gpt":0.3078618922745757,"score_spread":0.3003659568506463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079501509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29855537,0.000093887415,0.0011403403,0.019526199,0.0022311173,0.00013182443,0.000028580904,0.000010222028,0.67828244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972971,0.000039204566,0.00061087083,0.0007247897,0.0007784275,0.0000010585359,0.0000022724428,0.0000043833934,0.00054191233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862856,0.0002212068,0.0004294567,0.00006745542,0.0004997837,0.00015351461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857306,0.00045147017,0.00027169418,0.00006132325,0.00054025644,0.00010221452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026119489,0.00006330983,0.0001394336,0.00008159142,0.00010718491,0.00008752255,0.00050827034,0.00007130316,0.00032400922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006952333,0.000043489672,0.00017091111,0.0000390347,0.0012061757,0.0002817287,0.00007684928,0.00035398817,0.0000040243294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016904072,0.00009123436,0.00049975497,0.0000036001597,0.00009394128,0.0000038893404,0.0013308338,0.0000010390612,0.0000912427,0.99680305,0.000107597916,0.0008047922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091586035,0.000039695402,0.0007937815,0.00004074695,0.000026803975,0.000041045834,0.0032277482,0.00006981119,0.000039844275,0.9539033,0.040851578,0.00004974504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051366276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007778835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69874173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005419858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055156204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44442043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111643050","doi":"10.3366/jipt.2012.0038","title":"<i>Jus Domicile</i> : In Pursuit of a Citizenship of Equality and Social Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Citizenship; Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Inequality; Settlement (finance); Global justice; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.036627547814092436,"score_gpt":0.36656328346689,"score_spread":0.32993573565279755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111643050","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93205386,0.0002611702,0.0011878702,0.0020691145,0.00069177256,0.000064327425,0.00003064583,0.0000029260266,0.0636383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998075,0.00005036335,0.00018344964,0.00036979278,0.0010428432,7.9092484e-7,0.0000020213547,0.0000039358774,0.00027176828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809736,0.00047979527,0.0005879642,0.000052695897,0.000577306,0.00020485156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834585,0.0007211596,0.00034338815,0.000037430447,0.00044948762,0.00010270452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038095806,0.00006206714,0.00020468743,0.00013976262,0.000052257747,0.000019983669,0.00020548866,0.00008683383,0.00020143438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019329202,0.000052006788,0.000097873526,0.00007468379,0.00037323014,0.00026553497,0.000024290712,0.0001636929,0.0000015984165],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015089859,0.000107795066,0.0053702025,0.000022043914,0.000031963817,4.9443474e-7,0.007679659,6.903062e-7,0.0009775353,0.98485464,0.00038149118,0.00042259114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014034488,0.00017981633,0.059848685,0.00018996773,0.0001446506,0.000024301517,0.031157227,0.000036721165,0.0044335593,0.8914672,0.010921159,0.00019324529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013050213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060014278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09338742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013471697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012960972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23140256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255632812","doi":"10.1177/1755088213507183","title":"Symposium: Maternal thinking for international relations? Papers in honor of Sara Ruddick","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; International relations; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Computer science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.015846875974870625,"score_gpt":0.31384787258366303,"score_spread":0.2980009966087924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255632812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27402958,0.000088952205,0.00851759,0.022310087,0.005617644,0.0002244893,0.0000451771,0.000021815757,0.6891447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99420667,0.00003352914,0.0011329376,0.0007259261,0.0015662387,0.0000039056426,0.000003917741,0.0000108022805,0.0023160728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797016,0.00024779473,0.00066967716,0.00012003085,0.0007140162,0.00027833483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786747,0.0009308975,0.00035488736,0.00007829865,0.0006187621,0.00014969513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025003804,0.00009874074,0.0002090763,0.00028754445,0.00009573153,0.0000757206,0.00066159817,0.00010552865,0.0006560338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001964156,0.00008976187,0.00021854827,0.00007027625,0.00024423862,0.00025299174,0.000051590858,0.0002243475,0.000011594975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001631073,0.000092981456,0.015086245,0.000007079144,0.00008436654,0.0000029236655,0.0021962982,0.00005412554,0.0003885392,0.9805917,0.00026560389,0.0010670112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012819971,0.00012695283,0.020159677,0.00016304232,0.000032981625,0.000024282512,0.0033267546,0.00038214732,0.0005309722,0.8760292,0.09778776,0.00015427251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013961131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004257203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72017705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024466182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015950552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.718311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328375590","doi":"10.1177/1755088215573093","title":"Rethinking states in international politics: Introduction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; International relations; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02509449535912566,"score_gpt":0.3389629346593855,"score_spread":0.3138684393002598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328375590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58117723,0.00023019468,0.00290889,0.13581872,0.012207383,0.000122242,0.000032805143,0.000040340074,0.2674622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917012,0.00008076056,0.0007651959,0.0012731209,0.0050990675,7.1865884e-7,0.00001000944,0.0000075249704,0.0010624286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783075,0.00033060467,0.00049315806,0.00010828072,0.0009101271,0.00032705185],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826115,0.0002803706,0.00018479086,0.00007129575,0.0009052292,0.00029716908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003039351,0.00008325883,0.00015342527,0.0002937693,0.00005439232,0.00011402829,0.0005162791,0.000095077536,0.00019956315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004225308,0.00007798844,0.000097507684,0.000112429836,0.00027189113,0.000548099,0.00006121102,0.00036780143,0.000026369806],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008187335,0.00010006826,0.0030760171,0.0000014633483,0.000040472572,0.00003681819,0.0064261835,0.00014101989,0.000008024099,0.98724866,0.0024973229,0.00034209233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004226883,0.000043922355,0.0005236856,0.000028860826,0.0000075743515,0.000041431995,0.014106287,0.0003178323,0.000018250204,0.8703291,0.1140837,0.000076701566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041956583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012245412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41052395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010317544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000312645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50583935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329438416","doi":"10.1177/1755088214533042","title":"Brown’s Paradox: Speed, <i>ressentiment</i> and global politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Politics; Resentment; Sociology; Power (physics); Contradiction; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014073321544547166,"score_gpt":0.29855679204099594,"score_spread":0.2844834704964488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329438416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19056547,0.00020894462,0.001230396,0.01311618,0.0018997951,0.000038611222,0.000025998532,0.000015741838,0.7928989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912573,0.000039739698,0.00022356407,0.0030691952,0.002306742,2.521032e-7,8.4409993e-7,0.000004782281,0.0030975633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986413,0.00019440582,0.00035885983,0.000098728255,0.0003115892,0.00039511704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987153,0.000393865,0.00011792283,0.00006306011,0.00014809407,0.00056177453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010588717,0.00008586482,0.00018466036,0.00005612445,0.00016402763,0.00007202148,0.00027405578,0.00007127296,0.00047149468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008976268,0.00007463272,0.00012145822,0.000029933311,0.00062334206,0.0002061279,0.00004150293,0.00013991448,0.00006365439],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029173709,0.000056405737,0.0018274337,0.000003316448,0.000040296247,0.0000070210467,0.00015665512,0.0000012948368,0.000008751727,0.9947309,0.0020867924,0.0010519661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002954386,0.000044685505,0.0014945228,0.000017969616,0.000018693658,0.00004714005,0.0004411844,0.000031786487,0.00002381878,0.6524326,0.34507886,0.00007325161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013306194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006967059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80069184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028763514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109611334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5162536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469507082","doi":"10.1177/1755088213507189","title":"Discourses of motherhood and women’s health: <i>Maternal Thinking</i> as feminist politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Politics; Sociology; Gender studies; Normative; Power (physics); Feminist ethics; Feminist philosophy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014367325304310391,"score_gpt":0.35834521011208814,"score_spread":0.34397788480777775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469507082","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60799646,0.00032523295,0.0014404563,0.06865793,0.002663996,0.0000949553,0.000049554732,0.000023665869,0.31874773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902685,0.00011159584,0.00034373565,0.006067073,0.001450023,9.967226e-7,5.596538e-7,0.000012586813,0.0017448922],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975682,0.00044712276,0.00056003587,0.00010304383,0.0008770922,0.00044453662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976584,0.0010502631,0.0003979481,0.00008989047,0.0003379016,0.00046564566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032855084,0.00010736802,0.0002776703,0.00012651579,0.00019781406,0.00009578584,0.0004402284,0.000098550445,0.0002523816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023816884,0.000087172535,0.000108331165,0.00004528023,0.00097571174,0.00017608564,0.000057899848,0.0003295386,0.000009270062],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060559636,0.000093184804,0.0027398292,0.000019515019,0.00006235491,0.0000041004128,0.012121249,0.0000015828523,0.000013349638,0.9839532,0.0003332466,0.0005978315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036960765,0.00027202172,0.0013672122,0.00014327034,0.000010968883,0.000072627525,0.015981287,0.0000091682095,0.00012468881,0.9172664,0.06429407,0.000088664114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041760222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016137861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38227206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025491777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004295378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35950506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531031562","doi":"10.1177/1755088216671735","title":"Interlocuting classical realism and critical theory: Negotiating ‘divides’ in international relations theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International relations theory; Epistemology; Sociology; International relations; Negotiation; Critical theory; Modernity; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Politics; Post-realism; Realism; Humanity; Political philosophy; Field (mathematics); Narrative; Social theory; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020078690995287946,"score_gpt":0.36106630455094757,"score_spread":0.34098761355565965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531031562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05718142,0.0002780491,0.07954752,0.043129884,0.002755856,0.0001833925,0.00010044882,0.000051637555,0.8167718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98809665,0.0000748731,0.0010769406,0.000807309,0.0020190105,0.000006661071,0.0000034270834,0.000023029479,0.007892083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627095,0.001066295,0.0009818315,0.00024215132,0.0009198393,0.00051895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887994,0.009590776,0.0003258835,0.00012580547,0.00081035664,0.00034775696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005506704,0.00018077357,0.0002656838,0.00065721094,0.00023024365,0.00020927383,0.0006404414,0.00020677628,0.0018351928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02785891,0.00013340516,0.00019121637,0.00015992126,0.0011582072,0.0010168579,0.00016558408,0.0005182335,0.00005946872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021645777,0.000112772424,0.0047137267,0.0000022626716,0.000109758155,0.000037870243,0.0014072367,0.000010193096,0.00009411713,0.9855719,0.00041616097,0.0073075476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070418854,0.00006180174,0.00582206,0.00028113555,0.000030766976,0.00010199952,0.0041942396,0.00020049252,0.000033532473,0.9720418,0.016362699,0.0001653124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000059218044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012675129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93091524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00074741186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002769062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99907726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542139064","doi":"10.1177/1755088216673078","title":"Caught between vulgar and effete realists: Critical theory, classical realism and mythographies of power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Realism; Temporality; Sociology; Geopolitics; Mythology; Dialectic; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Power (physics); State of exception; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02067468740697245,"score_gpt":0.35471247682728135,"score_spread":0.33403778942030893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542139064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35454473,0.001356709,0.011707655,0.22059186,0.0019942704,0.00026305276,0.000613012,0.000060548995,0.40886813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99737954,0.00018437333,0.00025908518,0.00054465473,0.0012473664,0.0000012816981,8.9853273e-7,0.000012815116,0.0003699649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709755,0.0011647578,0.0005956015,0.00017336066,0.0006092407,0.00035948053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880173,0.010740975,0.00013346288,0.000116124604,0.0004632298,0.00052890345],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036181973,0.00014112904,0.00036322576,0.00022268138,0.00014396297,0.000058217847,0.0003082915,0.00016801599,0.00034078318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00904063,0.00009198309,0.00017338469,0.00009409792,0.0043305024,0.00033597142,0.000096604985,0.0002636379,0.000003915543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035647085,0.00006530212,0.0012069141,0.000013710272,0.000108827306,0.000027117987,0.0004791428,1.02515925e-8,0.00037035937,0.99506634,0.0002060995,0.002099672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045304603,0.00017112619,0.0024783018,0.00020390778,0.00006951316,0.00005116213,0.00079487544,2.586515e-7,0.0004068998,0.9750013,0.020250177,0.00011945075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013254092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000018699333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64283484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056501663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005695474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572338458","doi":"10.1177/1755088216687783","title":"The Law of Peoples as inclusive international justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Politics; Economic Justice; Duty; Law; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Political science; International law; Rule of law; Peaceful coexistence; Chinese law; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Municipal law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037693981071495936,"score_gpt":0.42019886355110153,"score_spread":0.38250488247960557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572338458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011536746,0.00007621479,0.00025355542,0.115286484,0.0036949064,0.000042605214,0.000025579197,0.0000059026243,0.869078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99223536,0.00019317036,0.00012631025,0.0023843714,0.0035891721,0.000001028182,7.782415e-7,0.000007094021,0.001462691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774575,0.00029191104,0.0004982682,0.00008673246,0.00106672,0.00031060053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993759,0.0040556923,0.0005113177,0.00019878868,0.0012082382,0.00026700835],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027934317,0.000086538035,0.00016292009,0.000059473852,0.0011122726,0.00023647657,0.0018835095,0.000111979265,0.0002457869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024175933,0.000060205155,0.00021401973,0.000022774697,0.0028082852,0.00049218326,0.0002567259,0.00042485635,0.0000335563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018370227,0.000070806534,0.000120509445,0.0000056186163,0.0001302311,0.00001857173,0.001140558,0.0000018609288,0.00003668824,0.99769986,0.0002636721,0.00032789574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000267757,0.00004816144,0.0006854735,0.0000651496,0.000047446447,0.000024028956,0.004673932,0.0000083705945,0.00032391888,0.93029803,0.06349562,0.00006211229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00048850436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011581085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98069865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020503407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045444086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605832155","doi":"10.1177/1755088217702671","title":"Pregnant woman versus mosquito: A feminist epidemiology of Zika virus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Maternal and Child Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Johnson and Johnson; University of Guelph","keywords":"Zika virus; Reproductive rights; Reproductive health; Abortion; Context (archaeology); Political science; Economic growth; Public health; Politics; Reproductive justice; Global health; Gender studies; Sociology; Health care; Population; Law; Geography; Medicine; Pregnancy; Virology; Demography; Biology; Nursing; Economics","score_opus":0.058304222393520504,"score_gpt":0.4087457597322906,"score_spread":0.3504415373387701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605832155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86858296,0.0004904866,0.00024237321,0.013396885,0.0027213308,0.0000955,0.00006170594,0.000008231939,0.11440055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950116,0.00009896905,0.0005553346,0.0025672857,0.0012277261,9.17036e-7,0.0000017869116,0.000009284267,0.0005270823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998399,0.00012157369,0.0007400929,0.00010875081,0.00032472602,0.0003058357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778277,0.0006179294,0.0006542456,0.00024679693,0.00033345097,0.00036482202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010747137,0.000108348264,0.00047511637,0.000087658,0.00007597022,0.000010326199,0.0004420809,0.000089069785,0.0002566216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041310727,0.0000739468,0.00024504558,0.0000142515555,0.00038444344,0.000085030195,0.00010738418,0.0003056418,0.000025800782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036002605,0.0002598893,0.05340793,0.00005389315,0.0002742451,0.00014854112,0.00003937236,0.0000012097174,0.00039242939,0.94026065,0.0006805813,0.00088098546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059396457,0.0024245451,0.59299177,0.0014735196,0.00022068522,0.0019248979,0.00032730246,0.00005723959,0.0034133173,0.37364018,0.017415278,0.00017163917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000075340715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002096286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56662047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015041491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014389941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49455783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612527315","doi":"10.1177/1755088217705893","title":"Adam Smith: So what if the sovereign shares in ignorance?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Politics; International relations; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.061434093518987966,"score_gpt":0.3856862017956098,"score_spread":0.3242521082766218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612527315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035711497,0.0009694412,0.00031096133,0.20879625,0.0036041876,0.000118970565,0.000028451088,0.000013092072,0.75044715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915702,0.0003633137,0.00005417952,0.0043828064,0.0029974245,0.0000018743851,4.1334002e-7,0.000007752735,0.0006220396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978489,0.00040379827,0.00041165398,0.000106019914,0.0007939467,0.00043565859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971668,0.0017558481,0.00025172936,0.0002115551,0.0003521637,0.00026190327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030602422,0.00009702605,0.00018002508,0.0000839846,0.00064272265,0.0008333512,0.0014463149,0.00013012042,0.0004704639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082325,0.00006538827,0.00022413615,0.000034926456,0.001860114,0.0013551668,0.000118266435,0.00068168214,0.000045997876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089810026,0.000070484726,0.00079561776,0.0000036676474,0.00004246857,0.00004099316,0.0009874406,0.000005136584,0.0000039332867,0.9960669,0.00026914512,0.0016244033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030990632,0.00003221105,0.009310712,0.00019682669,0.000011863486,0.00001399191,0.0034164027,0.000019150491,0.000047315956,0.96290463,0.023657635,0.00007936345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002740388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004343998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9558587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023118105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041605136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98556674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2676463658","doi":"10.1177/1755088217714010","title":"David Mitrany on the international anarchy. A lost work of classical realism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Anarchism and Radical Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Realism; Order (exchange); State (computer science); International relations; International relations theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04494376860665758,"score_gpt":0.3681614132473323,"score_spread":0.3232176446406747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2676463658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12055566,0.000046613983,0.000700784,0.23633628,0.00271164,0.00009737469,0.00007365893,0.000008624431,0.6394694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903142,0.00007226885,0.00018701346,0.002729058,0.0030581255,0.0000010231365,0.0000017047911,0.000010612356,0.0036260174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734807,0.00033245893,0.000536944,0.00012083945,0.0013007977,0.0003608846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965117,0.0019729945,0.00046695909,0.00026861514,0.0004390601,0.00034067137],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021806385,0.00011216184,0.00021728339,0.00012978885,0.0003851097,0.0001498818,0.0021320032,0.00011015878,0.0009168552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069685713,0.00007130819,0.00031757395,0.00004494755,0.0031641007,0.000223662,0.00013280909,0.00053497474,0.000046527162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024551185,0.00017405754,0.0017801819,0.0000022237875,0.00013737468,0.000038754126,0.00065807666,0.0000021349226,0.000031240597,0.9882032,0.007657267,0.0010699775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004858149,0.00012627295,0.01839592,0.00019855461,0.0000375973,0.000022464983,0.0017069692,0.000027091632,0.00022856957,0.8319379,0.14671284,0.00012001216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015916032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000017327566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8697585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020697233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002941619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904617869","doi":"10.1177/1755088218814038","title":"Defining a relationship between transitional justice and <i>jus post bellum</i> : A call and an opportunity for post-conflict justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Transitional justice; Economic Justice; Jus ad bellum; Relation (database); Scope (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Criminology; Law and economics; International law; Use of force; Computer science","score_opus":0.050947275985693256,"score_gpt":0.3797413628914925,"score_spread":0.32879408690579925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904617869","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94704956,0.00018579674,0.0068376395,0.016879935,0.0006141002,0.00015479972,0.0006638356,0.00001792594,0.02759639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924182,0.000025990497,0.0015623982,0.003945996,0.0018166245,0.0000014620366,0.00004049139,0.000009454899,0.00017934665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984444,0.0003100905,0.00038947747,0.00014093635,0.00041353903,0.00030156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99536294,0.0025958864,0.0001620808,0.000059621863,0.0012353683,0.000584092],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002080598,0.00010578038,0.00017737802,0.0001280803,0.00048714608,0.00011962095,0.00021501923,0.00013482457,0.000045451376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056568384,0.00010074665,0.00008245436,0.00006034665,0.0007077884,0.0005028364,0.0000325746,0.00026966896,0.0000035973492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023248048,0.000057778438,0.003178761,0.000026203406,0.000045632358,0.0000081715025,0.0041331933,8.948765e-7,0.000025273828,0.99163,0.00016137799,0.00050020294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017718816,0.0012334236,0.09241839,0.00016095073,0.0010633573,0.00023813518,0.032935947,0.00051854056,0.000015993237,0.8508433,0.018404149,0.00039592118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016897912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017899406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14078672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010342081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035421347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67721725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916059466","doi":"10.1177/1755088219828768","title":"Feminist foreign policy as ethical foreign policy? A care ethics perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Militarism; Foreign policy; Sociology; Power (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Transformative learning; Feminism; Gender studies; Politics; International relations; Ethics of care; Political economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03479279894347687,"score_gpt":0.4110495915603796,"score_spread":0.37625679261690276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916059466","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016189676,0.00020351434,0.00030977023,0.04186095,0.00050385273,0.00015261119,0.000035512476,0.000024939256,0.9407192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97145087,0.00008118786,0.00018489268,0.019951303,0.005400328,0.0000030917683,0.0000026883947,0.000022753966,0.0029029152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597824,0.0008991834,0.0005625044,0.00023183035,0.0016794485,0.0006487863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530166,0.001816616,0.00028747818,0.00017919224,0.001828562,0.00058649003],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002722809,0.00019072587,0.00033074213,0.00044044186,0.00029865085,0.000191623,0.000924048,0.0005929631,0.00085703796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012631431,0.0001665892,0.00044439678,0.00023911084,0.0008192357,0.00018026646,0.00013110304,0.0020701867,0.00020615997],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017825353,0.00007257303,0.0010959957,0.000013334514,0.00013121878,0.000031196043,0.0388919,0.0000033868505,0.000021501792,0.9591912,0.00024907902,0.00012034671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044993276,0.00019469211,0.00046508797,0.000056165416,0.000021331074,0.00009586371,0.21436259,0.000006144568,0.00008686209,0.7409744,0.043147594,0.00013930137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021992445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000044746415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9552612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015877389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037196707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918818536","doi":"10.1177/1755088219833416","title":"Revisiting Rosa Luxemburg’s internationalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalism (politics); Eurocentrism; Political economy; Politics; Militarism; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02331127467741932,"score_gpt":0.3606040081813228,"score_spread":0.3372927335039035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918818536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09099847,0.00014988455,0.0016716071,0.022859527,0.0033687647,0.000084703,0.000020812824,0.000024102239,0.8808221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989474,0.000026322065,0.00031566585,0.0024374428,0.0046407366,8.35547e-7,0.0000028040902,0.000011226254,0.0030909593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775463,0.000465224,0.0005205425,0.000120918914,0.0008246963,0.0003139779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705154,0.0017234001,0.00019173855,0.0001028282,0.0006456548,0.0002848564],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030625174,0.00009854657,0.00020774819,0.00016615978,0.00009748244,0.000111758294,0.0005970343,0.00008861147,0.005108885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030362587,0.00008651167,0.00026246178,0.000094085626,0.0002796073,0.00044760466,0.00006628775,0.00035879383,0.00028757445],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011262692,0.00004881808,0.001081042,0.000006212473,0.00006928398,0.00002540704,0.00036146576,0.0000049972136,0.00014512504,0.9965885,0.00017599223,0.0013805056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002874569,0.00003366065,0.00023526757,0.000108076405,0.000013704056,0.000041136766,0.0010528166,0.000015597187,0.0001643105,0.8184985,0.17945795,0.0000915247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013084563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.7124403e-7,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8984755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022632815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010318194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99580055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951762308","doi":"10.1177/1755088219852646","title":"Global justice, sovereignty, and the problem of perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Sociology; Framing (construction); Public international law; Law; Theory of criminal justice; Public sphere; Law and economics; Realm; Political science; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.020124612582103994,"score_gpt":0.3559391360233175,"score_spread":0.3358145234412135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951762308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015516648,0.00017831201,0.0002507414,0.027731663,0.00040020648,0.00008249487,0.000021075544,0.000004040922,0.95581484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99687123,0.000044968936,0.0002556091,0.0016127978,0.0008010338,4.870956e-7,1.5946482e-7,0.0000030466413,0.0004106552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843717,0.0003900986,0.00030364588,0.00007101878,0.00058394833,0.00021414315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971333,0.0018069099,0.00016216043,0.000058233883,0.0006777271,0.00016167146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021693246,0.000061671264,0.00017569521,0.000040173756,0.00007805736,0.000035604124,0.0003327316,0.00007770651,0.00039857833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017711832,0.00003861495,0.0001346256,0.000067833156,0.0015162295,0.00017913568,0.00006371932,0.00024625284,0.000012712017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031014724,0.000047304577,0.00038193486,0.0000103727425,0.00008594616,0.0000031019595,0.0010390416,0.000004340146,0.000002025793,0.997963,0.00006735059,0.0000854138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007287939,0.000055951976,0.0006139431,0.000042933974,0.00005715296,0.000026673315,0.008600458,0.000013902974,0.0000107755595,0.98798704,0.0018191752,0.000043180848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016988075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000043168075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9813546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002109616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023548864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5586611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955238354","doi":"10.1177/1755088219860858","title":"Potentiality, political protest and constituent power: A response to the special issue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012239567249191043,"score_gpt":0.32985346151714956,"score_spread":0.3176138942679585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955238354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26764643,0.000030840125,0.0004113572,0.075363904,0.0026657162,0.0002883146,0.00004110983,0.000013021161,0.6535393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98322785,0.0000041919507,0.00014969171,0.008173764,0.005505925,0.0000027951082,4.5734842e-7,0.000007707704,0.0029276076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967575,0.0013177291,0.0004445838,0.00015534606,0.00069547625,0.000629356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99619997,0.0024978486,0.000102662445,0.00014690016,0.000368481,0.0006841301],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044781566,0.000118591546,0.00023838082,0.00012854439,0.00019051967,0.000106582615,0.00055732485,0.00013275474,0.004029917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072789527,0.000081207225,0.00015324706,0.000082807,0.0011926685,0.00018479471,0.00016092185,0.00041923538,0.00042124963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011448814,0.0000900258,0.0008682688,0.0000024397214,0.00006867278,0.00003502463,0.0003888214,0.0000011728526,0.000039680544,0.9965306,0.00066018314,0.00017022926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035748817,0.00020371626,0.006474323,0.000038618007,0.0000200799,0.00012999415,0.0028922781,0.0000029028909,0.00012569434,0.8187764,0.17087777,0.00010069218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041421317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003095138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7155814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000266429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038252654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99688053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111118299","doi":"10.1177/1755088220981093","title":"Introduction: Why read Reinhold Niebuhr now?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Power (physics); Politics; Cruelty; Liberalism; Communism; Religious studies; Sociology; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Law; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.06336651254960735,"score_gpt":0.28082304447980894,"score_spread":0.2174565319302016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111118299","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010785389,0.0002563833,0.0040785046,0.5421935,0.007725896,0.000091551374,0.000059561247,0.000060373284,0.4347489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9328542,0.00003627923,0.00023312324,0.01414897,0.04262168,0.0000014985344,0.000013526514,0.000019472407,0.010071296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861705,0.00011448931,0.0005190038,0.00013283268,0.0004366484,0.00017998507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984431,0.00023959609,0.00022628818,0.00010097298,0.0007818689,0.00020817471],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062249566,0.00010227023,0.00017121769,0.00010000729,0.000105041574,0.00015005442,0.00030870896,0.000054826563,0.008361041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011147532,0.00008298779,0.00015706656,0.000025122625,0.00034806645,0.00038080124,0.000035444078,0.00045500064,0.0003006807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016445327,0.00005370082,0.000015196162,0.000013279851,0.00007626511,0.00001153992,0.003422487,0.000008331171,0.00016247788,0.89617187,0.09958073,0.00031966192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024417328,0.00010640481,0.000040708757,0.000023531256,0.00003409046,0.000048787428,0.0035593982,0.000057270394,0.000395546,0.2061012,0.78930175,0.000087148794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000652955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003605455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9220688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007842997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005824407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112048689","doi":"10.1177/1755088220979728","title":"Re-reading Niebuhr’s <i>The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness</i> : The crisis of democracy in an interdependent world then and now","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Impossibility; Democracy; Settlement (finance); Argument (complex analysis); Theme (computing); Sociology; Reading (process); Interdependence; Political economy; Politics; History; Law; Political science; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.00833632137754686,"score_gpt":0.22482225387928295,"score_spread":0.2164859325017361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112048689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9403686,0.00077114464,0.000030155074,0.036370907,0.00016046074,0.00014362588,0.00012381798,0.0000026219452,0.02202868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99701875,0.000057144734,0.000018729785,0.0023361377,0.00046890022,0.000001089041,0.0000036416468,0.000009660035,0.00008596715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868494,0.00027775826,0.0005521861,0.00009144971,0.00026938206,0.00012425784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989912,0.00050115254,0.00025362737,0.00011234454,0.000073823496,0.00006786889],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078126084,0.00010427567,0.0002455322,0.00007224575,0.000066783294,0.00006673341,0.00041122283,0.000022264116,0.00021344448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012168088,0.00004891413,0.00011031612,0.000026752443,0.00059931446,0.00021749789,0.00014474621,0.00030423634,8.0384285e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036692782,0.00008639808,0.01203985,0.000015549156,0.0001551203,0.0000024248047,0.014789104,0.0000046662326,0.0001499719,0.9716155,0.0005256936,0.0002488311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0048613176,0.0005781389,0.19559735,0.00077508844,0.00044907053,0.00021111668,0.046798486,0.0001788766,0.0054224925,0.74160355,0.0031602902,0.0003642489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000038076512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041479736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23001194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015564012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009830034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23370674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168669772","doi":"10.1177/17550882211020409","title":"From critique to reaction: The new right, critical theory and international relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Critical theory; Ideology; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; International relations theory; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Political philosophy; International relations; Left and right; Liberalism; Law and economics; Realism; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021526551535408354,"score_gpt":0.38856933771912266,"score_spread":0.36704278618371433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168669772","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09730594,0.00052336405,0.045976322,0.48238212,0.0108981365,0.00017318154,0.00012964978,0.000054777236,0.36255652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95927304,0.000042797743,0.002238719,0.009113831,0.0061247316,0.0000031871145,0.000008173247,0.000015407755,0.023180097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725926,0.0009204297,0.0005154294,0.00019474882,0.000807188,0.00030294238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942138,0.004219949,0.00012029832,0.0001519467,0.0008024024,0.00049156277],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021272122,0.00011838907,0.00016968539,0.00013471494,0.0003075488,0.000256302,0.0005641556,0.00011063697,0.0042754016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013098801,0.00008859409,0.00014884144,0.0001228191,0.0004091831,0.00055350445,0.0001357973,0.0004553811,0.000095838965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010374439,0.00008372033,0.0002614308,7.666813e-7,0.00014487667,0.0000673404,0.0018104397,0.0000019371048,0.00040429458,0.9847323,0.011317588,0.0010716164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023842044,0.000019960546,0.002957243,0.000066693836,0.00003875658,0.000059493344,0.0035322253,0.000005678285,0.00041636592,0.7930785,0.19950065,0.00008605071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021862044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007472467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86196715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037339283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004893962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99663484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189474062","doi":"10.1177/17550882211036635","title":"In the eyes of all mankind: Interests and independence in Vattelian statehood","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Soviet and Russian History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023296173072354945,"score_gpt":0.3607489412515763,"score_spread":0.3374527681792214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189474062","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8612926,0.00062662066,0.00007855788,0.022920646,0.0008422006,0.000053096977,0.000006648386,0.000002201965,0.11417743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99751496,0.00014038602,0.00010102685,0.001713102,0.00022694454,6.580986e-7,3.7539274e-7,0.0000030787041,0.00029948316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850965,0.0004622861,0.00034225313,0.00006868335,0.00045488265,0.00016224565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990045,0.0006245947,0.000114035465,0.000054486452,0.00013523776,0.00006718372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001825407,0.000049400267,0.00012382172,0.00015834084,0.000023798906,0.000026423015,0.0003019824,0.00005849464,0.00025415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090636074,0.000035176483,0.000054508844,0.000093347764,0.00027994261,0.0002013721,0.000037546422,0.00029790544,0.0000029467324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043591663,0.00012841416,0.011438821,0.00000505052,0.00001892658,0.0002202258,0.0066706315,9.0543466e-7,0.000065839246,0.9805269,0.00030497296,0.000575685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007637534,0.00006663839,0.12829697,0.00019529703,0.000012700897,0.00012823401,0.027560288,0.0000060607294,0.0003324138,0.81752527,0.025016924,0.000095471805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00020690562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036482222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16300169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012506763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020234572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27827644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234880639","doi":"10.1177/1743453x0700300205","title":"Is Workfare Egalitarian?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Workfare; Entitlement (fair division); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Politics; Citizenship; Welfare state; Basic income; Social citizenship; Economics; Sociology; Welfare; Political economy; Political science; Economic system; Law; Social science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.037974985868276426,"score_gpt":0.4172372418689003,"score_spread":0.3792622560006239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234880639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030996006,0.00019435145,0.0016763624,0.044897217,0.002731344,0.000048040798,0.000009523373,0.000017126402,0.91943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836907,0.00007047934,0.00024222636,0.004458283,0.0060488,2.5042175e-7,2.9787594e-7,0.0000059884724,0.005483013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984852,0.000116592455,0.0003740157,0.000060934504,0.0006035774,0.00035968912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984774,0.0006569282,0.00014729252,0.00004749353,0.00043960055,0.00023128757],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002783038,0.00006723524,0.00013875017,0.00013046854,0.00022733455,0.00003759164,0.00031866794,0.00009170465,0.0003620302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00186689,0.000049736544,0.00019928129,0.000107797794,0.0004648495,0.0001926136,0.000037151916,0.00022503528,0.000032399406],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007159501,0.000044923083,0.0016630783,0.0000013369148,0.000110618945,0.000020216923,0.0039830073,1.6954304e-7,0.000008115761,0.99018747,0.0020671205,0.0018423783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022455957,0.000033134373,0.0073278267,0.000031010808,0.000017337316,0.000013578796,0.019204533,4.1538146e-7,0.00015803694,0.8927488,0.08016656,0.0000742503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001618226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000042946507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95269465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021504979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015842677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39639768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243231905","doi":"10.1177/1743453x0500100110","title":"Book Review: The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0965919479108357,"score_gpt":0.37483513797647555,"score_spread":0.27824319006563986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243231905","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020589538,0.043472264,0.0007569966,0.6854712,0.00274571,0.00042870195,0.00012856236,0.000034655604,0.24637239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9261894,0.00079081807,0.00007319052,0.06629242,0.003002505,0.0000035138426,0.000012353791,0.000016090553,0.0036196893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779904,0.000450991,0.00082609314,0.00010060839,0.00056052906,0.00026271443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99774295,0.0009888507,0.00024223744,0.0001719548,0.0007125354,0.00014149469],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025027997,0.00010866438,0.00024561427,0.00013493073,0.00007760299,0.0000625242,0.00047582103,0.00009049549,0.0023061736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016751305,0.000069846734,0.00016634775,0.000021377218,0.0007818797,0.000429114,0.00003722518,0.0009323578,0.00002933635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056165707,0.00018564617,0.000030128322,0.00008525662,0.00003127595,0.000008312653,0.0043414687,0.0000035670066,0.000042478383,0.9864044,0.008524201,0.00028705547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028031613,0.000094771065,0.0003451423,0.0007875928,0.0000547568,0.000040497558,0.0047128173,0.000050982548,0.00018933343,0.22326775,0.77007,0.00010603499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003107333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007989864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9055999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012691907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012847561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316466952","doi":"10.1177/17550882221144643","title":"Rationalism and the “rational actor assumption” in realist international relations theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Rationalism; Ecological rationality; Realism; Great Rationality Debate; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.024367306311153383,"score_gpt":0.36147460779030627,"score_spread":0.3371073014791529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316466952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03175444,0.0001558941,0.006443061,0.08836706,0.002357172,0.0003191039,0.00014228898,0.000057400757,0.8704036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9757814,0.00019415776,0.00037355238,0.0015501558,0.0021069865,0.00001974647,0.00005486073,0.000015570811,0.019903576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674445,0.000811339,0.000808187,0.00016350434,0.0011525279,0.0003199615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943487,0.004248944,0.0003466069,0.00011197724,0.0007729315,0.00017081593],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006296519,0.00013333242,0.00020307799,0.00070444,0.0003380231,0.00020947825,0.00060735183,0.00013680855,0.002036154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075289393,0.00009955969,0.00019684118,0.00034799863,0.0010384787,0.0007145986,0.00010045191,0.0004490886,0.00016564873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031493627,0.000054212207,0.0023292743,0.000001450145,0.00013095928,0.000014608814,0.001775326,0.00017002883,0.000013787722,0.99138516,0.0032782503,0.0005320052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013405925,0.000014660653,0.024975654,0.000041230393,0.000021503602,0.00004075208,0.0024327245,0.0008046574,0.0000065440945,0.91606605,0.054156087,0.000099547746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011148738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000045987028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94402695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044396883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003547128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377242283","doi":"10.1177/17550882231169489","title":"A human right to political membership &amp; the right to territory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Human rights; Sovereignty; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.07290947138363313,"score_gpt":0.40594785536669964,"score_spread":0.3330383839830665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377242283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03871242,0.000012087086,0.00037274905,0.3266429,0.0021597326,0.00015511016,0.00004886822,0.000063799576,0.6318323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611377,0.0000016765055,0.0001647429,0.023698302,0.0074639875,0.000008011376,0.0000029385258,0.000019621235,0.0075029936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957293,0.0008528925,0.0006465683,0.00020254799,0.0014671948,0.0011014934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99502987,0.0025261096,0.00009633941,0.00023074923,0.000530122,0.0015868059],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044508046,0.00016845795,0.00026696446,0.00037205458,0.00054839393,0.00017557146,0.001268473,0.00018602784,0.0018188783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064357123,0.00011524832,0.0003117937,0.0003265282,0.000883103,0.00022784855,0.00019290432,0.0007850307,0.0011803571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052131796,0.000079096026,0.000092170034,0.000004942877,0.000072700335,0.000057842095,0.0013667496,0.0000063261905,0.00012302332,0.98285455,0.015251158,0.000039328825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013157006,0.00006225641,0.0008541415,0.000055886747,0.000021736125,0.000022175636,0.0009858895,0.0000018099912,0.0002012202,0.73110574,0.26644057,0.00011702802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002526073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000112709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059796986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030652512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379389365","doi":"10.1177/17550882231178884","title":"Rethinking the political in the pluriverse: The ethico-political significance of care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Foregrounding; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Political philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05752746537160647,"score_gpt":0.39026463403416917,"score_spread":0.3327371686625627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379389365","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0966842,0.00026457166,0.0002521473,0.47667024,0.002231602,0.00044390294,0.00008713915,0.000044063017,0.42332214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840716,0.000022477345,0.00003345961,0.012929904,0.0027468514,0.000010483112,0.0000027789238,0.000016174106,0.00016624358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925859,0.0033966412,0.00089326716,0.00019258096,0.001747598,0.0011839977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9766663,0.021775499,0.00016148743,0.0003292338,0.0006857365,0.00038177444],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071641835,0.00018534409,0.00033455112,0.00018925655,0.00045762135,0.00013359544,0.0020461264,0.00022005315,0.00029169442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013976246,0.00009569367,0.00044092245,0.0005154646,0.004660804,0.00021590925,0.0001631509,0.0016079668,0.000064749984],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015223492,0.000083861145,0.0003142707,0.000022719687,0.00004784793,0.00007173261,0.011428116,0.000007334201,0.000025720454,0.9873989,0.00030995792,0.00013731023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002638195,0.00009581635,0.00085171027,0.00010325576,0.00004880187,0.000030397428,0.0746195,0.000017945813,0.00017165193,0.90093416,0.022757627,0.0001053272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025507377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039221937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88738745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035556854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044000053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99804795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380610366","doi":"10.1177/17550882231182169","title":"Beyond ‘globalizing’ care: Care ethics for the pluriverse","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Communitarianism; Dualism; Criticism; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Liberalism; Politics","score_opus":0.1412130201669691,"score_gpt":0.5528811106299262,"score_spread":0.41166809046295705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380610366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010789544,0.0023965118,0.026816918,0.36335257,0.048746053,0.0012563105,0.0004011392,0.00017588669,0.5460651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630588,0.00031189155,0.0011904462,0.02823341,0.005109907,0.000026570053,0.0000168215,0.00003294769,0.0020192002],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553007,0.0019440887,0.0007282553,0.00013420518,0.0011615112,0.0005018538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93039554,0.065992616,0.00038284436,0.00019560764,0.0027816433,0.0002517302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009530492,0.000119454664,0.00020473168,0.00014186092,0.00094790367,0.000023910981,0.0008005452,0.00039551742,0.00045635822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.079338044,0.00007720411,0.00023583446,0.0001441778,0.00046142377,0.0001780223,0.00022424922,0.0055589406,0.00026904352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002442249,0.000016549113,0.00038373494,0.00013610878,0.00012626589,0.000026664067,0.010252923,0.000024193998,0.000024872723,0.97038144,0.017833453,0.0005495868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007206822,0.00007511341,0.00040961197,0.00019522556,0.00008450042,0.000013221892,0.118391365,0.00005447484,0.000033483702,0.6005873,0.27936473,0.00007027808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000033933626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012668869,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95226926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057040417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093371206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381052104","doi":"10.1177/17550882231181422","title":"Building the pluriverse with care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Ethics of care; Generative grammar; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.037905062251774244,"score_gpt":0.3727108677247483,"score_spread":0.33480580547297406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381052104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117693566,0.00011395782,0.0019050447,0.12258553,0.0024788096,0.00011023362,0.000021387064,0.000070148024,0.75502133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536645,0.000020673437,0.00022607224,0.0019065939,0.0019182195,9.242677e-7,5.2853295e-7,0.000006506595,0.00055404875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847335,0.0002541589,0.0001923401,0.000062732215,0.0007007699,0.00031663844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769235,0.0015016003,0.00007708002,0.000069064336,0.000450034,0.00020988572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012779284,0.000059406324,0.00009106215,0.00010067865,0.0002499385,0.00006043363,0.00047002384,0.00006178009,0.00013239366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001791758,0.000034820987,0.00010436093,0.0001522677,0.00078729447,0.00017790165,0.000046745765,0.00037178502,0.000057306817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005697691,0.000011470672,0.0001814553,0.000003026334,0.000041002295,0.000048714912,0.002440545,0.000021931804,0.000012583732,0.9964674,0.00039504483,0.00031981297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017264238,0.00004651007,0.0005407675,0.00004506626,0.000019738636,0.000014411342,0.012123662,0.000008086207,0.00008528544,0.9100094,0.076881856,0.000052580584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056605466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008407223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87767285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017890483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022551065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29008192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387860917","doi":"10.1177/17550882231197720","title":"Impartial third and disinterested judgment: Kojève and Arendt’s cosmopolitan phenomenologies of human rights as a response to Schmitt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Normative; Human rights; Law; Realm; Contradiction; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03329648522562954,"score_gpt":0.38485388464976905,"score_spread":0.3515573994241395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387860917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9131724,0.000056419158,0.000039967967,0.0042502745,0.00031354922,0.00007715872,0.000039135673,0.000023595307,0.082027465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977514,0.000014408964,0.00004984795,0.0004804037,0.0003170454,0.0000022149122,0.0000013398861,0.0000061860774,0.0013771392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977851,0.0007640679,0.0004659102,0.00014302444,0.00040675147,0.00043517826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704754,0.0020494247,0.00014259559,0.00009483456,0.00022816753,0.00043741023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023803778,0.000112007256,0.0002853003,0.00031694418,0.0002368501,0.00005093343,0.00031982092,0.00011782176,0.00018421805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003225158,0.000089044894,0.00009307449,0.00012321054,0.0013529758,0.00019490285,0.00017613753,0.00024133787,0.000025122248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010654129,0.00006335316,0.0005993398,0.0000050115955,0.00011061182,0.00004039675,0.0010966276,5.0421255e-7,0.00037515475,0.9963927,0.00017083423,0.000080035126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004831263,0.00042499477,0.01564599,0.000068206435,0.0000245443,0.000030383544,0.0036832674,0.0000034935367,0.0008436456,0.97717834,0.00152251,0.000091513815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010346872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000103834345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084578976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015642175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090975394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49850962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}