{"meta":{"query_hash":"89fe768115ba","filters":{"venue":"Journal of International Political Theory"},"cohort_total":34,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":34,"exported":34,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/89fe768115ba","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+International+Political+Theory"},"results":[{"id":"W1983906571","doi":"10.1177/1755088214555597","title":"Drone warfare and the limits of sacrifice","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Violence, Religion, and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sacrifice; Biopower; Drone; Politics; Revolution in Military Affairs; Political science; Militarization; Political economy; State (computer science); State of exception; Citizenship; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Military science; History","score_opus":0.05126544717323265,"score_gpt":0.2837875246610274,"score_spread":0.23252207748779477,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1983906571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11410527,0.019980447,0.017963108,0.031201383,0.00035404318,0.000023499773,0.000025417576,0.000040666975,0.81630623],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836187,0.0015367126,0.0011178629,0.001261579,0.000056951198,0.000018187271,0.000004984657,0.000018779312,0.012366177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737895,0.0016229284,0.000047082252,0.00031160732,0.00031842483,0.00032101196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985984,0.00079540245,0.000117336414,0.00024828088,0.00013188763,0.00010858863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002940565,0.0002413577,0.00034855757,0.0007225829,0.0058123935,0.006288171,0.00069630163,0.002268101,0.0025666507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033263904,0.00024799307,0.0002655995,0.00039429136,0.068779044,0.0064133643,0.0062403986,0.0043801693,0.00036299526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004351106,0.000002904948,0.00007794567,0.0000069124,0.0000011943254,0.000019184308,0.005615073,0.00007309815,0.00006211189,0.99162006,0.00035160957,0.0021654912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008266203,0.000030363075,0.0006211598,0.00014055955,0.0000044101967,0.00014192227,0.007141066,0.00023998416,0.00029152917,0.8577792,0.13358723,0.000014291995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037771373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00448509,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006288171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035935002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018427977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0260728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985248823","doi":"10.3366/e1755088210000479","title":"An Ethnography of Migrant ‘Illegality’ in Sweden: Included Yet Excepted?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Ethnography; Phenomenology (philosophy); Sociology; Context (archaeology); Politics; Lived experience; Gender studies; Precarity; Embodied cognition; Immigration; Political science; Criminology; Migrant workers; Critical ethnography; Political economy; Economic growth; Law; Geography; Psychology","score_opus":0.022699401233484684,"score_gpt":0.37926059524287137,"score_spread":0.3565611940093867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985248823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936022,0.00067520683,0.00024558374,0.00073091104,0.000047915393,0.000026245907,0.000035956687,0.000005481697,0.0046304497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954222,0.0010649981,0.00022950416,0.0003206493,0.000023023296,0.000051418945,0.000047699097,0.000016362248,0.0028242462],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997382,0.0018035811,0.00010301418,0.00015962607,0.00016435515,0.0003875554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974426,0.0016725289,0.0003198782,0.00010025827,0.00011583938,0.00034892937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002350457,0.0006347395,0.00072200334,0.0018602614,0.011941503,0.005126292,0.0010049298,0.0016056746,0.0030622575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032904218,0.00059949356,0.00030275338,0.0016803177,0.0115931155,0.004257105,0.006382388,0.0024004425,0.00029647307],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000084182175,0.000008341403,0.0010631274,0.000025693478,0.0000011515533,0.0005706826,0.99678147,0.0000062350537,0.00016348358,0.00045568345,0.00015352413,0.00076221226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.1543235e-7,0.000010849637,0.00086951576,0.00004789961,0.0000011835939,0.00023548973,0.99506503,0.000007801848,0.000038791102,0.00007711862,0.0036415546,0.000004162394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017237341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038872253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017237341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022747903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021147684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034273982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2023347283","doi":"10.1177/1755088215573092","title":"Theorizing state civil disobedience in international politics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Civil disobedience; Argument (complex analysis); State (computer science); Power (physics); Law; Politics; Law and economics; Political science; Civil society; Order (exchange); Political philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023932406860924276,"score_gpt":0.3473827315028335,"score_spread":0.3234503246419092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2023347283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16480426,0.0012705107,0.08758976,0.024733946,0.00014103464,0.000110239394,0.000041922278,0.000051253955,0.7212571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99190265,0.00031289007,0.0026162812,0.0006066178,0.00004885983,0.000081689155,0.00001005236,0.000014653308,0.004406337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514186,0.0026083433,0.00012783869,0.00062698155,0.0007217615,0.000773222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530965,0.0029112196,0.00062059297,0.00064336724,0.0002522001,0.00026297465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060738563,0.00046722425,0.00041967252,0.002392145,0.005805278,0.007705941,0.0013197679,0.0037885357,0.0047302186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007075387,0.0004860791,0.00083969586,0.0018141622,0.06459507,0.012856423,0.0066549336,0.004935584,0.00033371084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013576001,0.000004152644,0.00019336026,0.000004878115,0.0000014625765,0.000023060007,0.0019516611,0.00025832746,0.00002354743,0.99695045,0.00010577994,0.00048198766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007828185,0.000008932678,0.0003977242,0.000034870776,0.000005648742,0.000043280328,0.0021256458,0.0014697906,0.000080143334,0.9881265,0.0076940246,0.0000056793747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030023628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024659857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007705941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055849124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021700922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040521562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2029974543","doi":"10.3366/e1755088209000317","title":"Political Friendship among Peoples","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; University of St Andrews","keywords":"Friendship; Politics; Political philosophy; Political science; Duty; Sociology; Political economy; Equity (law); Law; Social psychology; Law and economics; Social science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03654066236211519,"score_gpt":0.36806890168715556,"score_spread":0.3315282393250404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029974543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7179728,0.0029648338,0.002983732,0.009776839,0.00016385791,0.00002315394,0.000080802085,0.000041546096,0.26599246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99716336,0.00024623508,0.00015177137,0.00013820309,0.000026156136,0.0000035621483,0.000008458824,0.0000019470588,0.0022603485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998345,0.0008662581,0.000040291678,0.00018201863,0.00026317686,0.00030319102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871075,0.00040635723,0.00027441332,0.00013441427,0.00018559926,0.00028847184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013336792,0.00010337817,0.00020661959,0.0011313973,0.0028615068,0.0022640862,0.00021520269,0.0005663764,0.0046380935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032660037,0.000077982346,0.00011006312,0.0008463847,0.00434717,0.002540159,0.0018826356,0.00056344626,0.00039785317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061865976,0.00006285251,0.034516424,0.0000874566,0.00005008588,0.0005483199,0.13016813,0.0002212936,0.00073966285,0.74526054,0.0064453655,0.081838004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002790219,0.00023868911,0.08889422,0.0002621932,0.000068585236,0.001360603,0.14363189,0.0011257218,0.00064411125,0.29516134,0.46850672,0.0000780707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016655212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012890022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0046380935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007578167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037711053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015515983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2074862659","doi":"10.1177/1755088214555596","title":"Scapegoat racism and the sacrificial politics of “security”","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Violence, Religion, and Philosophy","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Scapegoat; Racism; Politics; Sociology; Race (biology); Persecution; Security studies; Criminology; Gender studies; Political science; Environmental ethics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.0258869274908025,"score_gpt":0.26463936262980353,"score_spread":0.23875243513900102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2074862659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3001797,0.0035462051,0.0147846835,0.026361113,0.00030571816,0.00002335905,0.000015100419,0.000034170946,0.65474993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945747,0.00025035787,0.00042050186,0.00056089915,0.00003129251,0.0000068907375,0.0000027083904,0.000007580339,0.004145112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99671775,0.0021386263,0.000038403985,0.0002429928,0.00041848078,0.00044373205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987588,0.0006341274,0.0001428413,0.00018271615,0.00013253755,0.00014899665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002994796,0.00034297205,0.00023195431,0.00086402346,0.010024193,0.0056762053,0.0007223626,0.0020355755,0.0016627858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031155786,0.00014234496,0.00024629317,0.00058212527,0.054838125,0.0032710044,0.0057144295,0.0038480305,0.00017442022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066972475,0.0000044988287,0.00035350342,0.000007703605,0.0000021894657,0.000037304657,0.04811336,0.000080429876,0.00009027035,0.9486317,0.0005822686,0.0020899992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013030664,0.0000462672,0.0031366427,0.00016599192,0.000015939519,0.0003634657,0.07087109,0.00066990574,0.0008773732,0.7143925,0.20941731,0.000030527255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009434779,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009574377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010024193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003936241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023056373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028559625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079501509","doi":"10.3366/e175508821000042x","title":"Kant, International Law, and the Problem of Humanitarian Intervention","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Humanitarian intervention; Responsibility to protect; Principle of legality; Law; Intervention (counseling); Coercion (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; International law; Politics; Security dilemma; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.007495935423929406,"score_gpt":0.3078618922745757,"score_spread":0.3003659568506463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079501509","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015854295,0.033218734,0.030276153,0.20242529,0.001235522,0.000051758292,0.000059957132,0.000082082384,0.7167962],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326939,0.010954075,0.008085876,0.017966455,0.0020247991,0.00018742454,0.000047039885,0.000091672075,0.027948763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98848933,0.0075777806,0.00034678224,0.000923573,0.0013313676,0.0013312292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926744,0.0055051805,0.00052661286,0.0005940576,0.0004097221,0.00029013306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01073141,0.0006164849,0.00074851396,0.0021660198,0.008748331,0.01038285,0.0014299033,0.010423108,0.0036304886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011040179,0.0004728118,0.000734019,0.002433861,0.075873755,0.008735052,0.005012146,0.010314115,0.00053603516],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022254178,0.0000024339504,0.000021175296,0.0000069350353,0.0000010677874,0.0000073322863,0.00028429454,0.00012316194,0.000004920261,0.99781656,0.00086576905,0.00086411065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005482166,0.0000039599245,0.000053116717,0.00004186215,0.0000022112595,0.000017191058,0.00026230552,0.00016382584,0.000021984322,0.9821836,0.017239714,0.0000046949713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037916666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028832091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01073141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008703387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00703721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06314772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111643050","doi":"10.3366/jipt.2012.0038","title":"<i>Jus Domicile</i> : In Pursuit of a Citizenship of Equality and Social Justice","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Citizenship; Dialectic; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Law and economics; Politics; Sociology; Inequality; Settlement (finance); Global justice; Political philosophy; Law; Political science; Political economy; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.036627547814092436,"score_gpt":0.36656328346689,"score_spread":0.32993573565279755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111643050","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12331173,0.0042534177,0.060034014,0.21655944,0.0022382548,0.00011602144,0.000059609138,0.000117270894,0.59331024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97326994,0.00055266306,0.0062646647,0.00949671,0.00031838418,0.00008054144,0.000016873646,0.000025805615,0.009974411],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954235,0.002806394,0.00016876908,0.00041086716,0.0005226998,0.000667764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749243,0.0009638838,0.00036118543,0.00035952913,0.00036149228,0.00046154263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00682189,0.00021821375,0.00051067176,0.0006686444,0.007304012,0.008310142,0.0007514102,0.0039609345,0.0015296959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005399694,0.00014665401,0.00044911035,0.00066652347,0.0370254,0.006984706,0.007573674,0.0050111543,0.00033830808],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006929068,0.000006226965,0.00038247125,0.000013930624,0.0000016546078,0.00004362761,0.0041246964,0.000036171285,0.00009019382,0.99078864,0.0021875398,0.002317948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009874533,0.00004150552,0.001482539,0.00015735828,0.000006368387,0.00032466245,0.014182074,0.000584113,0.0004755499,0.8833115,0.099397816,0.000026671312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026965186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041715596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008310142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024022644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058182906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036078036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255632812","doi":"10.1177/1755088213507183","title":"Symposium: Maternal thinking for international relations? Papers in honor of Sara Ruddick","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; International relations; Sociology; Epistemology; Political science; Philosophy; Law; Politics; Computer science; Internet privacy","score_opus":0.015846875974870625,"score_gpt":0.31384787258366303,"score_spread":0.2980009966087924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255632812","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010509264,0.039342184,0.00023164121,0.79130924,0.1583446,0.000016297816,0.00006585381,0.000017148925,0.009622139],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08471855,0.10011059,0.0011603222,0.22918251,0.40048346,0.00022787205,0.00024336211,0.00020402818,0.1836694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982059,0.00077922,0.00008548029,0.00038017717,0.00031648815,0.00023268748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932382,0.0024225956,0.0003018001,0.00019460235,0.0019899916,0.0018527368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004999055,0.0010306936,0.00099666,0.00091520644,0.0042004003,0.006366957,0.001314449,0.0062799463,0.01516174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013395875,0.0003964047,0.0007861362,0.00072644424,0.0025674966,0.0048758015,0.0040936843,0.011243442,0.003706052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046098212,0.000025557832,0.00010576781,0.00008716999,0.000009597578,0.00005445192,0.0005320788,0.00004041976,0.00011043369,0.007318201,0.98341656,0.008253703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025441286,0.000026177931,0.0006737497,0.00044523686,0.00002270763,0.00008442896,0.002289957,0.000081300845,0.00017915474,0.0055465163,0.9906036,0.000021677033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034296643,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061980374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01516174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003393652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034268654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05072111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2328375590","doi":"10.1177/1755088215573093","title":"Rethinking states in international politics: Introduction","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; International relations; Political economy; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02509449535912566,"score_gpt":0.3389629346593855,"score_spread":0.3138684393002598,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2328375590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033827033,0.2944774,0.071536936,0.26953322,0.023393959,0.00017705293,0.0005718476,0.0003035346,0.306179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65413785,0.14448218,0.033229534,0.055814553,0.041772086,0.0006770619,0.0003932477,0.0007418511,0.06875161],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859995,0.00074611604,0.000054993143,0.00025394085,0.00020785152,0.00013719792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949151,0.0040127183,0.00022302823,0.0003791626,0.00031305864,0.0001569014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027251602,0.0010984438,0.0009425773,0.002562305,0.003289213,0.00832502,0.0017648889,0.0052537825,0.011769598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045188977,0.0006085348,0.0007491915,0.004312314,0.019263519,0.01749883,0.0059997896,0.009162377,0.0010383012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009527845,0.000015584108,0.00019428697,0.00019749546,0.0000069569996,0.000027564005,0.0032464464,0.0003035459,0.00012184342,0.97621185,0.0060491073,0.013615795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008715567,0.00002935812,0.0005515007,0.0006433845,0.000014437631,0.00006179393,0.0026020869,0.00057617895,0.00018191402,0.74025124,0.25505123,0.000028113942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042387964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006354062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011769598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003828133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022149116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03937322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2329438416","doi":"10.1177/1755088214533042","title":"Brown’s Paradox: Speed, <i>ressentiment</i> and global politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Politics; Resentment; Sociology; Power (physics); Contradiction; Subject (documents); Environmental ethics; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014073321544547166,"score_gpt":0.29855679204099594,"score_spread":0.2844834704964488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2329438416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0760914,0.010117741,0.016829794,0.35213667,0.0021170897,0.000033924218,0.000053045336,0.000111301786,0.54250896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95153403,0.0020716505,0.0021701572,0.024500083,0.00058321597,0.000040980416,0.000015777796,0.00012740315,0.01895657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940256,0.0036117707,0.000108376575,0.0005658897,0.0010338413,0.0006543884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99293184,0.00466465,0.00053393864,0.0006418162,0.00061234296,0.00061547227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006881336,0.00035770732,0.00044580558,0.00125446,0.0075980737,0.010217547,0.0009873328,0.0039417488,0.005544635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010243283,0.00023695156,0.00038417798,0.001652181,0.040253837,0.0130980145,0.0070805005,0.007669357,0.0005045044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006578977,0.0000044753956,0.00014337152,0.0000140666925,0.0000018458702,0.000037081973,0.0041870144,0.000103414655,0.00004072076,0.98999655,0.003795766,0.0016692326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013010944,0.000011487452,0.00031162545,0.00009155683,0.0000039567735,0.00011196989,0.010251406,0.0004034887,0.00015078911,0.8584597,0.13017009,0.000020939655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01141206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009968231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01141206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008595362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006619245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062363982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2469507082","doi":"10.1177/1755088213507189","title":"Discourses of motherhood and women’s health: <i>Maternal Thinking</i> as feminist politics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Foucault, Power, and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminism; Politics; Sociology; Gender studies; Normative; Power (physics); Feminist ethics; Feminist philosophy; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014367325304310391,"score_gpt":0.35834521011208814,"score_spread":0.34397788480777775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2469507082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15845771,0.042916104,0.0086729145,0.46706006,0.0013858017,0.00003604461,0.00007176049,0.000054759883,0.32134485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707334,0.0043991003,0.0009167428,0.013300378,0.00029726198,0.000027835587,0.000011084456,0.000026239972,0.010287929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922948,0.005863207,0.00007592769,0.0003497615,0.0006407447,0.00077547575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99560034,0.0034480356,0.00033392457,0.0001088461,0.00025528303,0.00025346896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008997347,0.00056300894,0.00039215336,0.0014485106,0.013351493,0.009407171,0.0012472242,0.004070356,0.0020130705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005179128,0.00027008593,0.0002691343,0.001144951,0.07516437,0.0054680975,0.004377523,0.0047556916,0.00019036159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013242578,0.000007649042,0.00038722856,0.00005545791,0.00000337758,0.00015381898,0.2992168,0.000070687216,0.0001869997,0.6915323,0.0040503046,0.004322043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002006095,0.00003050659,0.0014902249,0.000799249,0.000015753078,0.00031544373,0.32131657,0.0003253406,0.0008859258,0.18944977,0.48531333,0.00003789079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1306156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1123564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1306156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025883695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01207586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25971067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2531031562","doi":"10.1177/1755088216671735","title":"Interlocuting classical realism and critical theory: Negotiating ‘divides’ in international relations theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"International relations theory; Epistemology; Sociology; International relations; Negotiation; Critical theory; Modernity; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Politics; Post-realism; Realism; Humanity; Political philosophy; Field (mathematics); Narrative; Social theory; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020078690995287946,"score_gpt":0.36106630455094757,"score_spread":0.34098761355565965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2531031562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08875682,0.010672563,0.18215702,0.13180415,0.0021619187,0.00017316944,0.000051744937,0.00011855146,0.58410406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97591066,0.0011321569,0.013324595,0.0035291917,0.0005489651,0.00019116767,0.000020530384,0.000093572395,0.005249121],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709146,0.024499834,0.0003635806,0.0010939029,0.0018978071,0.0012303152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626081,0.03166654,0.0016285449,0.0017706791,0.0012717893,0.0010543116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031878114,0.00093525305,0.001102671,0.0057834866,0.011353961,0.018087493,0.002789889,0.0062899347,0.003926141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034184255,0.00065048697,0.00082466914,0.0035431013,0.11799864,0.029755414,0.014083298,0.011554293,0.0004750811],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053789477,0.0000037037992,0.000034725075,0.000010890256,0.0000015748714,0.00002253911,0.006585625,0.00007068542,0.000015283122,0.99212694,0.00032468193,0.000798057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086823775,0.0000051101756,0.000033729346,0.00006153596,0.00000221353,0.000018384417,0.0046459464,0.0004076451,0.000052335676,0.98765975,0.0070984242,0.0000063474276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019918762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020450728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031878114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013965083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058076615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16858959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2542139064","doi":"10.1177/1755088216673078","title":"Caught between vulgar and effete realists: Critical theory, classical realism and mythographies of power","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Ottawa","keywords":"Politics; Epistemology; Realism; Temporality; Sociology; Geopolitics; Mythology; Dialectic; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Power (physics); State of exception; Aesthetics; Law; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02067468740697245,"score_gpt":0.35471247682728135,"score_spread":0.33403778942030893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2542139064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23790033,0.028065816,0.066806786,0.097130835,0.0016234297,0.00015260522,0.00010262093,0.000106635634,0.56811094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889797,0.0018139092,0.0027836743,0.0013643968,0.00024161456,0.00007953551,0.000020617243,0.000055930712,0.0046606753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99011165,0.007971099,0.00012025588,0.0005159883,0.00077904185,0.00050194137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874264,0.010565348,0.0006083829,0.0006835486,0.000440442,0.00027590405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010228848,0.00060211105,0.0005654662,0.005367505,0.008432188,0.014833055,0.0014645841,0.0028207265,0.0025930875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012538224,0.000425762,0.0004009129,0.0030363626,0.09512983,0.021756507,0.005705039,0.0048956205,0.00027422004],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008600872,0.000005471877,0.00007987418,0.000026070034,0.0000027106491,0.000043837917,0.029385803,0.00007346077,0.000029931545,0.9680913,0.0006545618,0.0015984377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110691935,0.00000861133,0.00011448785,0.0001724378,0.0000033657232,0.000057718673,0.025998635,0.00035210684,0.00011368901,0.9477259,0.025433758,0.000008276232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031929717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002643147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014833055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030822968,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06715363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572338458","doi":"10.1177/1755088216687783","title":"The Law of Peoples as inclusive international justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Politics; Economic Justice; Duty; Law; Sociology; Ideal (ethics); Political philosophy; Political science; International law; Rule of law; Peaceful coexistence; Chinese law; Law and economics; Environmental ethics; Municipal law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037693981071495936,"score_gpt":0.42019886355110153,"score_spread":0.38250488247960557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572338458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050970137,0.004271815,0.029241214,0.04545329,0.00082651246,0.00009224322,0.00004526667,0.00008746448,0.86901206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95343757,0.0011806465,0.0028744305,0.006648526,0.00051634875,0.00011481187,0.000019044955,0.000037140504,0.035171486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958313,0.0016665228,0.00014335565,0.0005119626,0.0011473249,0.0006994096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829215,0.0007046307,0.00019460163,0.00034877026,0.0002661538,0.00019379969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048625185,0.00035558164,0.00034553508,0.0012461803,0.005007366,0.0071211653,0.0009405898,0.0033232744,0.003456157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054725334,0.00023414922,0.0004933155,0.0010712353,0.04394405,0.007621805,0.005541394,0.0044645336,0.00038992602],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010504549,0.0000019986633,0.00007318693,0.000004754339,0.0000010046344,0.0000134123065,0.0013185437,0.000049631104,0.000017357843,0.99709904,0.00051153806,0.0009084205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008503016,0.000013810868,0.00041942595,0.000057753106,0.0000062304625,0.000042601,0.0018694582,0.00032263438,0.000121064535,0.91176796,0.08536102,0.000009558612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009351202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007661679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009351202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047110165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057528806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605832155","doi":"10.1177/1755088217702671","title":"Pregnant woman versus mosquito: A feminist epidemiology of Zika virus","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Maternal and Child Health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Johnson and Johnson; University of Guelph","keywords":"Zika virus; Reproductive rights; Reproductive health; Abortion; Context (archaeology); Political science; Economic growth; Public health; Politics; Reproductive justice; Global health; Gender studies; Sociology; Health care; Population; Law; Geography; Medicine; Pregnancy; Virology; Demography; Biology; Nursing; Economics","score_opus":0.058304222393520504,"score_gpt":0.4087457597322906,"score_spread":0.3504415373387701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605832155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44239005,0.051899727,0.006434195,0.27514622,0.00092775445,0.000070517766,0.00018327069,0.00003274893,0.22291549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97665715,0.01103191,0.00075837114,0.0055731116,0.0004605183,0.000031360967,0.000024191759,0.000017845372,0.0054455423],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967624,0.0026019113,0.00004415999,0.00014150157,0.00014932836,0.00030057473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606305,0.0033246551,0.000286179,0.000062638675,0.00011501222,0.0001483767],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036291007,0.0002776376,0.00026797983,0.0014757209,0.0065024486,0.003950554,0.0004995493,0.0018436929,0.005059749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005303716,0.00026244993,0.00015174293,0.00083860324,0.019613957,0.0044510667,0.0052567217,0.0026897485,0.0002080211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044158234,0.000024729547,0.012226237,0.00014944463,0.000008578844,0.0017941903,0.5030219,0.00007896575,0.00065414765,0.45242035,0.0072998903,0.022277454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015709606,0.00009424137,0.014671559,0.0009321269,0.000019165624,0.0049794903,0.59606004,0.00035003098,0.0004184439,0.06980435,0.31262547,0.00002931939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008932221,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011655767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99349755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034112013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014288865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024750113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612527315","doi":"10.1177/1755088217705893","title":"Adam Smith: So what if the sovereign shares in ignorance?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Sovereignty; Law and economics; Politics; International relations; Law; Sociology; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.061434093518987966,"score_gpt":0.3856862017956098,"score_spread":0.3242521082766218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612527315","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034774195,0.02062225,0.010325644,0.70603067,0.0022274875,0.00003813714,0.00010574361,0.000040521118,0.22583537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84167105,0.01001114,0.0032853573,0.086732864,0.0017208783,0.000050110288,0.000058643778,0.000064344975,0.056405652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984237,0.00087315025,0.00004560848,0.00024121847,0.00024441356,0.00017185872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846363,0.0009226096,0.00016164644,0.000096824515,0.0002123986,0.00014298919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002644251,0.00036511142,0.00047773545,0.0004991714,0.0032274383,0.0041267034,0.00058635167,0.0039116954,0.004786257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006227147,0.00022012982,0.00030286337,0.00072482857,0.016066093,0.010335241,0.0017884483,0.0065482636,0.0007970291],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021568256,0.000010961043,0.00066157384,0.000054330565,0.000013034212,0.00025095404,0.010485163,0.00010854839,0.0002267598,0.9434187,0.036730308,0.008018227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010864965,0.000019262863,0.0006671966,0.0001857947,0.000012668834,0.00029535659,0.010533002,0.00030396594,0.0005797185,0.7460318,0.2413355,0.000024829676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005790894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003932702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005790894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028221016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014940362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020475864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2676463658","doi":"10.1177/1755088217714010","title":"David Mitrany on the international anarchy. A lost work of classical realism?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Anarchism and Radical Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Realism; Order (exchange); State (computer science); International relations; International relations theory; Epistemology; Sociology; Law and economics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Economics; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04494376860665758,"score_gpt":0.3681614132473323,"score_spread":0.3232176446406747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2676463658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018338822,0.047359325,0.013858607,0.32288036,0.0022646827,0.000022069888,0.00008253457,0.000054527103,0.59513915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8419462,0.019717954,0.004776643,0.02960687,0.0041207564,0.00008715782,0.000053528987,0.00011078301,0.09958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987179,0.0007484902,0.000017824546,0.00014561402,0.000225171,0.00014503511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878174,0.00080584333,0.00008771952,0.000089766254,0.00014202805,0.00009285851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015560121,0.00034799063,0.000404952,0.0011374154,0.0050458713,0.004100494,0.0007142792,0.0022894987,0.005491527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031084365,0.00017606108,0.00026297444,0.0010172878,0.01756331,0.007484494,0.002226659,0.0045376844,0.00087202224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003988011,0.00000256597,0.00002490965,0.000006835086,8.173949e-7,0.000014475328,0.0005428471,0.00004871429,0.000012762073,0.9897161,0.008168167,0.0014576489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007505542,0.0000063952407,0.00014516505,0.00008481231,0.0000020392656,0.0000348538,0.0007954878,0.00021207028,0.000057368325,0.85446215,0.14418525,0.00000681916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057644593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068813656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057644593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00445403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018049474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032316387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904617869","doi":"10.1177/1755088218814038","title":"Defining a relationship between transitional justice and <i>jus post bellum</i> : A call and an opportunity for post-conflict justice","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Transitional justice; Economic Justice; Jus ad bellum; Relation (database); Scope (computer science); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Criminology; Law and economics; International law; Use of force; Computer science","score_opus":0.050947275985693256,"score_gpt":0.3797413628914925,"score_spread":0.32879408690579925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904617869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34990558,0.02611039,0.022269763,0.22707605,0.0017637954,0.00019054761,0.0000893799,0.000079226156,0.37251526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915765,0.0014797605,0.001340511,0.003510522,0.00013843653,0.00008839943,0.000012873029,0.000017207938,0.0018358437],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920962,0.004149396,0.00026258623,0.0003742407,0.0007011448,0.0024165572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882406,0.006253328,0.00194337,0.0005636476,0.0009909953,0.0020081496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010217722,0.00030197046,0.00076245883,0.0026087007,0.012082381,0.016303893,0.0018506531,0.0036481735,0.0036863748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015852472,0.00030488262,0.0005018306,0.002305973,0.058950584,0.017525092,0.02055781,0.010060249,0.0002622223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038908256,0.000044268985,0.0046422933,0.00012235618,0.0000073487477,0.0002956631,0.08539014,0.00005521536,0.000127916,0.89367515,0.0015948665,0.01400573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000086835835,0.00010911913,0.019093046,0.0013493587,0.000017807672,0.0005443826,0.4261059,0.00029174876,0.00041385935,0.48163423,0.070359066,0.000072719384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073895887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014087456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016303893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008817004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011702866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063972116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916059466","doi":"10.1177/1755088219828768","title":"Feminist foreign policy as ethical foreign policy? A care ethics perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Gender, Security, and Conflict","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Militarism; Foreign policy; Sociology; Power (physics); Argument (complex analysis); Transformative learning; Feminism; Gender studies; Politics; International relations; Ethics of care; Political economy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03479279894347687,"score_gpt":0.4110495915603796,"score_spread":0.37625679261690276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916059466","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013014911,0.019059688,0.008372133,0.62503546,0.002009221,0.000036259444,0.000026341722,0.00002447144,0.33242157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85363144,0.00999984,0.0031691699,0.08044025,0.0027194463,0.0001605466,0.000019547575,0.000050927076,0.04980884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918104,0.006457751,0.00007997741,0.00029098341,0.0006009285,0.0007599691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996157,0.0027037822,0.0002365783,0.00017376547,0.00029926014,0.0004296158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071926136,0.0004722864,0.00038267512,0.0010358948,0.006534995,0.0096430965,0.0009355712,0.007105583,0.0052696983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005916342,0.00017377365,0.0003144185,0.0007126511,0.05104479,0.0070555494,0.004516123,0.007282091,0.0005057862],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027106767,0.0000058730743,0.000051778443,0.000016320617,7.3690677e-7,0.00003729899,0.005260422,0.000057559566,0.000017011296,0.98970544,0.002792091,0.0020527665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010451555,0.00002242447,0.00019588512,0.0005069511,0.00000295697,0.00014085065,0.023997612,0.00029922542,0.00014801718,0.6841887,0.2904764,0.000010466996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008935712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008026238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012161941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012161941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00929108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08824146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918818536","doi":"10.1177/1755088219833416","title":"Revisiting Rosa Luxemburg’s internationalism","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalism (politics); Eurocentrism; Political economy; Politics; Militarism; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02331127467741932,"score_gpt":0.3606040081813228,"score_spread":0.3372927335039035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918818536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038490195,0.017806292,0.011816259,0.417003,0.007267525,0.00008386868,0.000080725054,0.00010618701,0.5073459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8243376,0.0074246326,0.00726079,0.044947088,0.0035666472,0.0002430066,0.000067348374,0.00021362444,0.11193923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971353,0.0016465193,0.0000821222,0.00032463053,0.0003799408,0.00043149298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884415,0.0007035712,0.000100403646,0.00010071044,0.00015071439,0.00010039992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004467597,0.00059301005,0.0003620621,0.0017333927,0.0044664205,0.006029097,0.000990272,0.0028721634,0.0044977902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004787825,0.00022322472,0.00047135114,0.0009285486,0.021295296,0.008715734,0.005129359,0.0062439097,0.00078832527],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040226273,0.000004380326,0.00004760151,0.00001822374,0.0000012059311,0.000067313835,0.0056512645,0.000043360145,0.000055137574,0.9811833,0.0101756,0.0027486002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011906975,0.000019297624,0.00032130975,0.00019373404,0.0000036485567,0.00016491822,0.004248043,0.00022318182,0.00017173938,0.28749445,0.7071318,0.00001591786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054870597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076021017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105432095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0105432095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003299829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07649672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951762308","doi":"10.1177/1755088219852646","title":"Global justice, sovereignty, and the problem of perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Injustice; Global justice; Economic Justice; Sovereignty; Sociology; Framing (construction); Public international law; Law; Theory of criminal justice; Public sphere; Law and economics; Realm; Political science; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.020124612582103994,"score_gpt":0.3559391360233175,"score_spread":0.3358145234412135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951762308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060672503,0.009237445,0.059481133,0.15527785,0.00080533396,0.00003619323,0.000062534324,0.000060845767,0.71436614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98523384,0.0017353877,0.003064044,0.004727604,0.00031232287,0.000050540988,0.000021396403,0.000039516774,0.004815419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99064285,0.0062114415,0.00020151294,0.00094238354,0.0011042731,0.00089754676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99267006,0.004946567,0.00053512055,0.00084951374,0.0005154701,0.0004832706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010970281,0.00050907646,0.000882022,0.0017647141,0.009733534,0.012680766,0.0012949969,0.005138326,0.003053016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008553812,0.00038271383,0.0007830846,0.001475955,0.08265456,0.017392509,0.012764427,0.010603955,0.00031282063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012398616,0.0000014913143,0.000037290185,0.0000035727992,0.0000010852906,0.000011192786,0.0014292444,0.00003343984,0.00000875788,0.9977755,0.00015258341,0.0005445531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041741005,0.000003491146,0.00005095271,0.000025773477,0.00000229846,0.000023501509,0.0012196725,0.00007960268,0.000028547118,0.9901804,0.008377967,0.0000035279286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043751854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036741337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012680766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063500023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047583105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058017075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955238354","doi":"10.1177/1755088219860858","title":"Potentiality, political protest and constituent power: A response to the special issue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Constitution; Politics; Opposition (politics); Epistemology; Democracy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012239567249191043,"score_gpt":0.32985346151714956,"score_spread":0.3176138942679585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955238354","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010994006,0.016481368,0.0007731219,0.8696151,0.10585668,0.000017807664,0.000044351797,0.000023837016,0.006088311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050049607,0.037512943,0.0022682208,0.39637327,0.49274957,0.0002623148,0.00016399486,0.00027649742,0.02034355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920744,0.003798933,0.000552869,0.0012579197,0.0014238976,0.0008919468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738429,0.019869357,0.0010361313,0.00086594425,0.0029118345,0.0014738414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012955134,0.001324439,0.0023922648,0.0034901178,0.008635022,0.016644422,0.0042694486,0.02231544,0.0060588107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026725948,0.0008980866,0.0019258059,0.004257673,0.02484915,0.023235068,0.010306418,0.03832651,0.0013164832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027519087,0.00006329217,0.00038520983,0.00021855393,0.0000114602135,0.00020172034,0.0036262928,0.00012864554,0.00006056945,0.15280053,0.83279365,0.009682582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022606793,0.000040404106,0.001178613,0.0006893631,0.00001740769,0.00040285653,0.007683877,0.0005743893,0.00007400234,0.089860976,0.8993903,0.000065234075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003195612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00585284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02231544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006574936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006799229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06851411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111118299","doi":"10.1177/1755088220981093","title":"Introduction: Why read Reinhold Niebuhr now?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Power (physics); Politics; Cruelty; Liberalism; Communism; Religious studies; Sociology; Enlightenment; Philosophy; Law; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.06336651254960735,"score_gpt":0.28082304447980894,"score_spread":0.2174565319302016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111118299","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045552943,0.040709585,0.00042088845,0.51229286,0.41324565,0.000025657311,0.00030120462,0.00016462851,0.032383937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012310316,0.035540253,0.0005444095,0.3271318,0.43456325,0.00009678423,0.000558652,0.00056746654,0.18868713],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862957,0.00032690287,0.00007847113,0.00035882,0.00044064198,0.00016568258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943739,0.0023109596,0.0002853248,0.00022547036,0.0020980765,0.00070623343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022388774,0.0010538413,0.0009115952,0.0016894997,0.003117257,0.0068577407,0.0014014161,0.0064850394,0.051827047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012730773,0.00035569048,0.00046345012,0.0015431438,0.0021627655,0.010542771,0.0024241565,0.00916352,0.029993331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068572353,0.0000049741557,0.000052969688,0.000049360515,0.0000010162826,0.000018040791,0.0001329569,0.000005758445,0.000023448847,0.0028517821,0.9922191,0.0046337685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003364409,0.000007643748,0.00028514102,0.000248383,0.0000017715905,0.000040140847,0.00035211325,0.00001714572,0.00003209507,0.0017713634,0.9972339,0.0000069392063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004911853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006138703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051827047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021008363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020909659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1733787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112048689","doi":"10.1177/1755088220979728","title":"Re-reading Niebuhr’s <i>The Children of Light and the Children of Darkness</i> : The crisis of democracy in an interdependent world then and now","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Populism; Impossibility; Democracy; Settlement (finance); Argument (complex analysis); Theme (computing); Sociology; Reading (process); Interdependence; Political economy; Politics; History; Law; Political science; Social science; Economics","score_opus":0.00833632137754686,"score_gpt":0.22482225387928295,"score_spread":0.2164859325017361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112048689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052397523,0.08942258,0.0034361924,0.33008546,0.00752142,0.000044282355,0.00021150483,0.000067084395,0.516814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7259763,0.03406039,0.0022824102,0.048279036,0.0027518522,0.00009112356,0.00008392559,0.00017329739,0.18630174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915123,0.0004415753,0.000016377513,0.000088450586,0.00017718678,0.00012503058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986627,0.0009530945,0.0000974619,0.000047698963,0.00013123841,0.00010783914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012309273,0.00043797836,0.000339578,0.00085281045,0.004500189,0.004704535,0.0007249895,0.0019628801,0.0037872454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023553127,0.00023201846,0.00019099866,0.000917005,0.014581721,0.009123659,0.0022766243,0.006029134,0.0004231923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027915028,0.000016681435,0.00057478,0.00011769289,0.000007204415,0.00021431944,0.0672649,0.00010857442,0.0002853992,0.7940568,0.12523971,0.012086079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063965263,0.000015829954,0.0008186292,0.0003301605,0.000005515391,0.00015610633,0.025107574,0.000047866048,0.00018695509,0.072071865,0.9012368,0.000016361493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02311912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056324065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02311912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00487418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032199011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04596913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168669772","doi":"10.1177/17550882211020409","title":"From critique to reaction: The new right, critical theory and international relations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Reactionary; Critical theory; Ideology; Politics; Epistemology; Sociology; International relations theory; Critical realism (philosophy of perception); Political philosophy; International relations; Left and right; Liberalism; Law and economics; Realism; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021526551535408354,"score_gpt":0.38856933771912266,"score_spread":0.36704278618371433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168669772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026942194,0.062643856,0.03637666,0.42264324,0.0044638566,0.00009991087,0.000057492296,0.000100795456,0.44667193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9393213,0.013525901,0.0071873725,0.02039548,0.003215767,0.00017727178,0.000035037294,0.00013283452,0.016009102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98253113,0.014470748,0.00026239335,0.0008675069,0.0012523029,0.0006159435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754655,0.020731293,0.0009965975,0.0011121434,0.0008464557,0.0008480507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016183363,0.0007985047,0.00069227343,0.0042957067,0.008011664,0.017298045,0.0013686215,0.0053338697,0.0029346254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01686356,0.00031747794,0.00047095367,0.003027632,0.11097961,0.017874787,0.006238423,0.00979224,0.00036963687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053164117,0.000005486863,0.000057814297,0.00003830201,0.0000022881375,0.00003093933,0.0095195575,0.00007732107,0.000020961128,0.98566854,0.0023340927,0.0022393384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075937396,0.000004898166,0.00005194038,0.00018772518,0.0000018321812,0.000029702918,0.006662548,0.00014691165,0.00005061351,0.95696676,0.035882294,0.00000726278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030636368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024926066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017298045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011317313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068300627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085586846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189474062","doi":"10.1177/17550882211036635","title":"In the eyes of all mankind: Interests and independence in Vattelian statehood","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Soviet and Russian History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Political science; Law and economics; Epistemology; Law; Sociology; Political economy; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.023296173072354945,"score_gpt":0.3607489412515763,"score_spread":0.3374527681792214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189474062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15114467,0.004748308,0.008949742,0.033648014,0.00017977851,0.0000256832,0.000025307334,0.000017901777,0.8012607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98859763,0.00032818766,0.00046994103,0.00096582004,0.000053914267,0.000021445756,0.000005058532,0.0000067336136,0.009551284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797636,0.0011637275,0.00004061357,0.00022905637,0.00017804699,0.00041217214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988728,0.0006857168,0.00011252411,0.00010746059,0.00010466179,0.00011678449],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002879776,0.00018480165,0.00019906067,0.0008860269,0.007423442,0.0070513515,0.00052589807,0.002223553,0.0017521908],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033682624,0.00019573515,0.0002516499,0.0005859491,0.029597962,0.005523999,0.006158978,0.003493725,0.00024344282],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041267135,0.0000035261517,0.0001176184,0.0000023444832,7.240139e-7,0.0000230666,0.008099166,0.000043398206,0.00002295939,0.9901574,0.0004085472,0.0011171035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001600892,0.000012328593,0.00045691952,0.000056476536,0.0000035084554,0.000053784213,0.0054140515,0.00025379844,0.00014380409,0.9413337,0.052242998,0.000012523363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062728175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007469554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007423442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044251545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026037686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032106876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234880639","doi":"10.1177/1743453x0700300205","title":"Is Workfare Egalitarian?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Workfare; Entitlement (fair division); Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Politics; Citizenship; Welfare state; Basic income; Social citizenship; Economics; Sociology; Welfare; Political economy; Political science; Economic system; Law; Social science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.037974985868276426,"score_gpt":0.4172372418689003,"score_spread":0.3792622560006239,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234880639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082921274,0.004940342,0.028964566,0.23765613,0.00091277395,0.00005186312,0.0000665372,0.000058454032,0.64442796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9691793,0.0013646712,0.0015190411,0.015312851,0.00044908124,0.000045061555,0.000018556366,0.000029206794,0.012082358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918759,0.0032905682,0.00016232164,0.0012801754,0.0013159977,0.0020749525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941174,0.0024673096,0.0011500517,0.0011490525,0.00069188466,0.0004243533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009351303,0.00029131063,0.0005871447,0.0011912119,0.005228214,0.010532088,0.0016025244,0.0060241674,0.0058572865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013822339,0.00025243475,0.00046514056,0.0012166968,0.04225188,0.008464832,0.0048252065,0.0057893596,0.0010295856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010239047,0.000009911067,0.00041339756,0.000013263688,0.0000060746033,0.000024189467,0.0015994539,0.000063628424,0.000025867055,0.99226123,0.0012367545,0.0043360293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011717417,0.000013507695,0.0011709642,0.0001234113,0.00001086998,0.00005130022,0.0024077066,0.00018084717,0.00020645303,0.9354462,0.060365368,0.00001163648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002982548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029500397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010532088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046969294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038179164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049454987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243231905","doi":"10.1177/1743453x0500100110","title":"Book Review: The Lesser Evil: Political Ethics in an Age of Terror","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0965919479108357,"score_gpt":0.37483513797647555,"score_spread":0.27824319006563986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243231905","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027464607,0.647677,0.0005758297,0.15917751,0.14497048,0.000060461156,0.00028570605,0.000045169618,0.046933178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070275813,0.48132792,0.00077505514,0.11959761,0.21184768,0.00018374567,0.00046647777,0.00018957713,0.17858438],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985676,0.0004637359,0.00008094731,0.00015978808,0.0006475374,0.000080372236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895862,0.0067351395,0.0004474714,0.00019955175,0.0025267254,0.0005049279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014781626,0.0012259387,0.0019564275,0.0035432912,0.0018633885,0.0051164813,0.0015525963,0.007014356,0.02540208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00971865,0.00057824247,0.000514376,0.0064239833,0.0033636126,0.0041681244,0.0013907275,0.007813464,0.010593968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003482949,0.000004092984,0.000020267937,0.0002043597,0.000002857993,0.000007935766,0.000027553062,0.000028905202,0.00000914994,0.0019838044,0.9904128,0.0072948746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007983703,0.000009057942,0.00026220165,0.0012563699,0.000007607989,0.000091862545,0.000104722,0.00004905348,0.000019359524,0.0039610886,0.99422175,0.000008927579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0088774655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032112952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02540208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042493157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004966664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0849784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316466952","doi":"10.1177/17550882221144643","title":"Rationalism and the “rational actor assumption” in realist international relations theory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Epistemology; Rationalism; Ecological rationality; Realism; Great Rationality Debate; Sociology; Positive economics; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.024367306311153383,"score_gpt":0.36147460779030627,"score_spread":0.3371073014791529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316466952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044908885,0.024877379,0.25118798,0.1375709,0.0011787651,0.00012438804,0.0001763529,0.00015806648,0.5398173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9471337,0.0055781794,0.029424537,0.0049670637,0.0012015813,0.00021577711,0.000080658625,0.000081758655,0.011316711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916815,0.005453093,0.00026280864,0.00080645847,0.0012883606,0.00050782633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99420893,0.004213319,0.0004728192,0.00053699507,0.00039422553,0.0001738315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009975749,0.000480403,0.00068185275,0.0015710793,0.0025216364,0.0064467434,0.0014563993,0.0040451987,0.0025845156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008072142,0.00043342507,0.0009459214,0.001582327,0.03536766,0.008754619,0.0026603586,0.006648903,0.0005288974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014764507,0.0000017372504,0.000022301343,0.0000056752347,0.0000011170927,0.0000059483036,0.0002206139,0.00015194605,0.000008293698,0.99897206,0.00021614948,0.00039270436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031970815,0.000002653314,0.000041350253,0.000017241558,0.0000016744616,0.0000078945595,0.00009468192,0.00045586357,0.000025433594,0.9945044,0.004842368,0.0000033034692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002853953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017058314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009975749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050579654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024467108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052757442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377242283","doi":"10.1177/17550882231169489","title":"A human right to political membership &amp; the right to territory","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Politics; Human rights; Sovereignty; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.07290947138363313,"score_gpt":0.40594785536669964,"score_spread":0.3330383839830665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377242283","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014349876,0.0023799918,0.014658978,0.03435114,0.00042095257,0.000027910153,0.00011800913,0.000047194764,0.93364596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8884196,0.0015386597,0.008250714,0.0068142405,0.00039326402,0.00014138236,0.000097217664,0.00006276772,0.09428221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956696,0.0025222048,0.00012723007,0.0005338771,0.0006359193,0.0005110997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819905,0.0008507137,0.00016885145,0.0003432821,0.00022144192,0.000216638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030878729,0.00029119258,0.0003047806,0.00068989943,0.0050561707,0.006866434,0.0007536382,0.0048142695,0.0155454585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002930122,0.00022850884,0.000360561,0.00071871746,0.033017736,0.005548054,0.0051335804,0.003891095,0.0021170448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002571919,0.000003801322,0.00007153011,0.00001087047,0.0000010777932,0.000019296662,0.0017866113,0.000040191626,0.00006939439,0.9931022,0.002441383,0.0024510748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005928739,0.000013947648,0.0007270396,0.0001227266,0.0000037239136,0.00016745935,0.002671021,0.00019092749,0.00027000613,0.73257285,0.26323658,0.000017754044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046512587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005417555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0155454585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020894702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002504653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052004755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379389365","doi":"10.1177/17550882231178884","title":"Rethinking the political in the pluriverse: The ethico-political significance of care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Critical Theory and Political Philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Foregrounding; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Political philosophy; Environmental ethics; Political science; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05752746537160647,"score_gpt":0.39026463403416917,"score_spread":0.3327371686625627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379389365","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06380837,0.01129248,0.048704557,0.3685831,0.0021935178,0.000058114485,0.00002788563,0.000041525098,0.50529045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9734387,0.0022740783,0.0031379722,0.011616999,0.00062867685,0.000056470784,0.000008280012,0.00004693627,0.00879186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908495,0.0070516258,0.00010706261,0.0005069521,0.0009385097,0.0005465254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99180824,0.00640868,0.00046219345,0.00043928315,0.00048940984,0.0003922658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010576859,0.00033669738,0.0004180978,0.0013297708,0.008975515,0.011938392,0.0011204334,0.0038875348,0.0020283551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008159262,0.00025035403,0.00034772154,0.00084481825,0.107560635,0.012313718,0.007696591,0.008840935,0.00022024172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017953591,0.0000023254465,0.000040887524,0.0000060509124,5.1930994e-7,0.000015478316,0.0063475375,0.000031227686,0.000014514401,0.99197793,0.0005064256,0.0010552693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000996273,0.000018470448,0.00030809487,0.00017631863,0.0000035391697,0.00008597518,0.01390038,0.00030998167,0.00014166642,0.86648935,0.11854169,0.000014653694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054239607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007561326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011938392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009338577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007274559,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067756414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380610366","doi":"10.1177/17550882231182169","title":"Beyond ‘globalizing’ care: Care ethics for the pluriverse","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cosmopolitanism; Communitarianism; Dualism; Criticism; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Liberalism; Politics","score_opus":0.1412130201669691,"score_gpt":0.5528811106299262,"score_spread":0.41166809046295705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380610366","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011413587,0.04024225,0.025781624,0.63493395,0.005260805,0.00004893705,0.000041477717,0.00007592353,0.28220147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66399544,0.023667425,0.013289282,0.25229403,0.006651501,0.00021517633,0.00009244483,0.00031649543,0.03947826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878226,0.008599654,0.00025415132,0.00073755207,0.0016000214,0.0009861108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924191,0.004726495,0.0003997492,0.00080602453,0.0006691578,0.0009794851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012903194,0.0007588682,0.00062137947,0.0009045222,0.005728497,0.01167106,0.0012078949,0.010122091,0.004952404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012991513,0.00021102968,0.0005302118,0.0011573358,0.057510894,0.019191964,0.014293826,0.0149288345,0.0010241728],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008311352,0.0000068267505,0.00016432352,0.00006736566,0.0000033304736,0.000052103038,0.00818022,0.0000885141,0.00004987563,0.96802247,0.014944444,0.008412128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008682792,0.00002024791,0.00025963673,0.00057664944,0.0000048256184,0.00014783182,0.006734686,0.0001866785,0.000089657435,0.7511098,0.24084695,0.000014374851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038749345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055757123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012903194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056384886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009613406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06823945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381052104","doi":"10.1177/17550882231181422","title":"Building the pluriverse with care","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Philosophy and Ethics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Ethics of care; Generative grammar; Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.037905062251774244,"score_gpt":0.3727108677247483,"score_spread":0.33480580547297406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381052104","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04400841,0.004151559,0.102379575,0.23131089,0.0016896169,0.00013265049,0.0000518383,0.00018112749,0.61609435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9301457,0.0013287866,0.0124524515,0.024180777,0.00032402246,0.00021456348,0.000034391862,0.00020114705,0.031118099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881749,0.007688951,0.0003213022,0.0012713093,0.0014193001,0.0011242294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930862,0.0036835936,0.00048372868,0.0013139294,0.0006460846,0.0007865309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015098495,0.0005872695,0.00063811865,0.0010894244,0.009120042,0.009932315,0.0013642464,0.0058697024,0.0041343216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015164845,0.0004021044,0.00071453245,0.00058623264,0.08859175,0.020185202,0.02039468,0.010897927,0.0008283834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017557562,0.0000026173818,0.00010686487,0.00001280464,0.0000017955493,0.000023740175,0.0063028936,0.0000637511,0.00002575296,0.9900141,0.0014315123,0.0020125029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055493683,0.000016724498,0.00013095007,0.00017516404,0.0000050753492,0.00010931191,0.0053255274,0.0002782259,0.00017583654,0.86534977,0.1284125,0.000015374408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004128195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049057337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015098495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007185177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009756109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07984942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387860917","doi":"10.1177/17550882231197720","title":"Impartial third and disinterested judgment: Kojève and Arendt’s cosmopolitan phenomenologies of human rights as a response to Schmitt","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Political Theory","topic":"Political Theology and Sovereignty","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Normative; Human rights; Law; Realm; Contradiction; Political philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Politics","score_opus":0.03329648522562954,"score_gpt":0.38485388464976905,"score_spread":0.3515573994241395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387860917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25072962,0.0071888096,0.05214551,0.09553132,0.0011214378,0.00010575122,0.000055845932,0.000092071044,0.5930297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712015,0.0006511414,0.0018183553,0.0027352055,0.00009164259,0.000054393564,0.000011095064,0.000031803524,0.0074861986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939814,0.0040397677,0.000107468535,0.00046527176,0.0009568724,0.00044924414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99608094,0.0028606956,0.00023013861,0.00033424847,0.00030725516,0.00018669534],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060301404,0.00042396074,0.00042983697,0.0013893275,0.008227114,0.009024232,0.0016648077,0.0061355387,0.0018686212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009062318,0.00033275082,0.0005937588,0.0010340494,0.0672302,0.015639244,0.0053665657,0.007406385,0.00024756358],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006597324,0.000009976836,0.000076835066,0.000013764803,0.0000019573629,0.00014136957,0.0945464,0.00009356916,0.00011463786,0.90292513,0.0009131489,0.0011566619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016487167,0.000020637026,0.00028934184,0.00015790915,0.0000058546334,0.0004504642,0.0775963,0.0007501697,0.00032365738,0.80417407,0.11617027,0.000044916804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005824895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040906565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009024232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006592182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027107964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047829866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}