{"meta":{"query_hash":"5e1dce6749e6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy"},"cohort_total":20,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":20,"exported":20,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5e1dce6749e6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+International+and+Comparative+Social+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1971425731","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2013.803997","title":"“Women without guardians” in Iran: gender, cultural assumptions, and social policy","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Social policy; Cultural issues; Positive economics; Sociology; Political science; Economics; Cultural diversity; Law","score_opus":0.1323539487287594,"score_gpt":0.42271013653520373,"score_spread":0.29035618780644434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971425731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.791409,0.005329406,0.0018946143,0.087661795,0.00033072892,0.0000653072,0.000043277298,0.000021178825,0.11324458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996323,0.0007665183,0.00031235983,0.0013199386,0.000027901408,0.000014198349,0.0000066732664,0.0000029057244,0.0012265977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99545115,0.0026644946,0.00008680259,0.0002501602,0.0006620824,0.00088545476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986339,0.00062022964,0.0003583305,0.00006210506,0.00015604873,0.00016932146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061856513,0.00034722232,0.00022791354,0.0011028034,0.007261891,0.0031010292,0.00095055107,0.0013810239,0.0016324315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005625833,0.00021093554,0.00020895938,0.0011737563,0.01935054,0.002546437,0.0026008512,0.0021423765,0.00012919436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010196295,0.00010926131,0.027497988,0.00014161339,0.000015507592,0.0008158861,0.21314573,0.0006439993,0.00050988235,0.6928977,0.005177605,0.058942847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059692644,0.00020719666,0.050973997,0.0007374809,0.0000330603,0.0007352253,0.5965999,0.0013438405,0.0011760177,0.15218087,0.19587466,0.0000780485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0618906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0618906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01579449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015693687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1230607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994678840","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2014.951383","title":"Welfare state regimes and the evolution of liberalism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Liberalism; Welfare state; Opposition (politics); Typology; Welfare; Politics; Economic liberalism; State (computer science); Positive economics; Social Welfare; Economics; Political economy; Public economics; Political science; Economic system; Sociology; Law; Market economy","score_opus":0.03216979183637985,"score_gpt":0.3571138185315037,"score_spread":0.32494402669512384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994678840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7394023,0.00073616736,0.011606886,0.005741682,0.000046579546,0.00004027408,0.00011184888,0.000034338074,0.24228007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987342,0.00008512566,0.00047543034,0.000059338152,0.00000879563,0.000008217504,0.000011987785,0.0000034986163,0.0006133328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621767,0.0020322911,0.00013166634,0.00039065155,0.0006476273,0.00058009767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99419206,0.002631991,0.0013638893,0.0007452174,0.00061822566,0.0004486008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041617025,0.00010315464,0.00021918946,0.0023763843,0.00206251,0.003998865,0.00040017057,0.000577943,0.0021179405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00933131,0.00012896038,0.00030564252,0.0025922798,0.0125841135,0.0026909795,0.0033904212,0.0015626141,0.00012384677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028734034,0.000020262432,0.017499063,0.000019385616,0.000011876755,0.00004035511,0.0047777565,0.001185738,0.00015255896,0.96303767,0.0002918888,0.012934658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020378238,0.00006771131,0.056591447,0.00012416116,0.000013547415,0.00010026733,0.006350606,0.0045956285,0.00039462245,0.90294033,0.028770315,0.00003099293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034435273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003357582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054017534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054017534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021745213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039192677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2010160685","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2014.965941","title":"Power relationships and the formulation of anti-poverty policies in emerging countries: the case of Palestine","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University; Harvard University; Boston College; U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs","keywords":"Civil society; General partnership; Poverty; Power (physics); Political science; Palestine; Christian ministry; Competition (biology); Process (computing); Public administration; Qualitative research; Economic growth; Public relations; Sociology; Economics; Politics; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03692490520395286,"score_gpt":0.3539656714323912,"score_spread":0.31704076622843835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2010160685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8051916,0.0055537997,0.0015714964,0.020278633,0.00010117968,0.00009831617,0.000016655695,0.000007636653,0.16718072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996033,0.0011580824,0.000237237,0.00050921354,0.000009149455,0.000021017944,0.0000027022431,0.0000023902724,0.0020271495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99323213,0.00471989,0.00010953699,0.00015304604,0.0002094844,0.0015759532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961893,0.002474759,0.00050262915,0.00012828497,0.00021794076,0.0004871663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104191005,0.00037016423,0.00035460264,0.0017188182,0.020447727,0.010762101,0.0012822865,0.002563008,0.0032944055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073307306,0.0003422228,0.00027039793,0.002061099,0.026564918,0.005964381,0.009967342,0.005232064,0.00016958191],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058669208,0.00011726241,0.008836819,0.00012748638,0.000015744696,0.006732398,0.4630019,0.0007353432,0.00025512028,0.5016656,0.000956785,0.017496869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058174915,0.00005725776,0.007831221,0.00096811145,0.00002405097,0.0010122916,0.8497571,0.00058984366,0.00044870676,0.06895418,0.070270166,0.00002897418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029950548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045895875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029950548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013585211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012244147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09856808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070010464","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2013.821951","title":"Social exclusion and self-esteem: The impact of the identity – bureaucracy nexus on employed people experiencing homelessness in Calgary, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Regina","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Social exclusion; Nexus (standard); Bureaucracy; Identification (biology); Welfare; Social work; Identity (music); Sociology; Social Welfare; Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Economic growth; Public relations; Gender studies; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.0512768167440629,"score_gpt":0.4354503375774089,"score_spread":0.384173520833346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070010464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966642,0.00012258615,0.000013230999,0.0006946837,0.000008917622,0.000011121406,0.00003253868,8.955893e-7,0.0024518496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99935,0.00011888631,0.000015622401,0.000076546115,0.000002489269,0.00000415218,0.000019326058,0.0000012765225,0.00041169947],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973847,0.00046443593,0.00008008411,0.000095170464,0.000701473,0.001273974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597794,0.00043701907,0.00079372164,0.00009823832,0.00096775714,0.0017253987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015158217,0.00022396365,0.00047276876,0.0016701826,0.013652063,0.004198311,0.001270729,0.00048961036,0.0026192127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040740496,0.00022453963,0.00035338942,0.0021907235,0.008145104,0.0009152588,0.0054658754,0.0021870742,0.00011579538],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009378231,0.0002880938,0.74382055,0.00003961983,0.00003288141,0.00072085677,0.23768185,0.00009441301,0.00021642393,0.0022558665,0.0013518379,0.0134038115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005629098,0.00003573927,0.6091039,0.000079470985,0.000010961155,0.00007987086,0.38843945,0.000099200886,0.00003943606,0.00020143575,0.0018877788,0.000017035567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9685291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98589295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03252205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03252205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047648072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23596513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099846281","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2013.802988","title":"Social networks amongst older people in OECD countries: a qualitative comparative analysis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen Mary University of London","keywords":"Qualitative comparative analysis; Homogeneous; Government (linguistics); Social network (sociolinguistics); Qualitative property; Demographic economics; Comparative research; Psychological intervention; Geography; Political science; Economic growth; Development economics; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Psychology; Social media; Computer science","score_opus":0.11721914063060186,"score_gpt":0.5119224514380613,"score_spread":0.3947033108074594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099846281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99477357,0.00070633064,0.00028949985,0.00025681235,0.000009074941,0.00027998234,0.0005646481,0.0000018035828,0.0031182591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99567896,0.0014921152,0.00077004434,0.0001554741,0.000007042333,0.000856998,0.000442717,0.0000039155875,0.0005927161],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339855,0.004594904,0.00042571683,0.00024067734,0.0005985186,0.0007415838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98674667,0.009306718,0.0014214583,0.00042803472,0.0016790767,0.00041809914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015372269,0.00036523887,0.00062300754,0.0072103306,0.0044363295,0.0025368591,0.0007129673,0.00062168634,0.00227295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017341675,0.00033354576,0.00042501322,0.009782537,0.0026467987,0.0029469137,0.0045482162,0.0007277941,0.00012497959],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017789875,0.00021307598,0.14287499,0.0010265738,0.00006370839,0.0007168206,0.8257164,0.00020224774,0.00028672535,0.003278828,0.0007717196,0.024671089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013869081,0.00012268842,0.073491,0.00058758777,0.000029762408,0.000110450805,0.9207906,0.000093068804,0.00011259628,0.00039742523,0.0042370763,0.000013900543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05325592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081916526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05325592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007904064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005710489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10589188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2463974525","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2016.1198268","title":"Assessing the sustainable development goals from a human rights perspective","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":110,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Millennium Development Goals; Sustainable development; Poverty; Perspective (graphical); Inequality; Political science; Development economics; Poverty reduction; Economic growth; Human rights; Human development (humanity); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.08789189772789484,"score_gpt":0.4414350494559593,"score_spread":0.35354315172806444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2463974525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025190353,0.0043014437,0.082488336,0.08859032,0.0008272645,0.00027972678,0.0007269389,0.00006918648,0.7975264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8733811,0.007361468,0.06091704,0.009151976,0.00091369887,0.00067153317,0.0007067275,0.000090832225,0.046805628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9824401,0.007962072,0.0005464523,0.00079738005,0.0061949627,0.0020590192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896214,0.004571524,0.0011655623,0.0008635339,0.002886352,0.00089170446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016901337,0.000860767,0.000623768,0.0055238293,0.0025466017,0.00989718,0.0017508751,0.004268425,0.010423703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022449518,0.00028084754,0.0009658645,0.002916353,0.01161231,0.015299772,0.0100215385,0.0042919824,0.0010778403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049169894,0.000029238816,0.0012854562,0.000055049317,0.000011857423,0.000047548616,0.00037854025,0.0015649061,0.000095411866,0.98136044,0.0034116288,0.011755037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040810387,0.000030348376,0.0017314419,0.00038629107,0.000013279811,0.00009751964,0.0028840115,0.002307734,0.00048809368,0.91080195,0.08123106,0.000024147474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009669937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010050233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016901337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006068211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013782649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08938384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530981181","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2016.1237373","title":"Do constitutions guarantee equal rights across socioeconomic status? A half century of change in the world's constitutions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation","keywords":"Socioeconomic status; Disadvantaged; Constitution; Politics; Political science; Poverty; Voting; Inequality; Inclusion (mineral); Economic growth; Demographic economics; Development economics; Law; Sociology; Economics; Social science; Demography","score_opus":0.12369481830800523,"score_gpt":0.4277545621581803,"score_spread":0.3040597438501751,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530981181","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12807195,0.025636485,0.01321656,0.5764955,0.004955536,0.00010617044,0.0002993979,0.000107505264,0.251111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9113237,0.010181458,0.006756377,0.05091576,0.0025216152,0.000153183,0.00016475457,0.00012973363,0.01785336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98310584,0.007700573,0.0011197334,0.0014490566,0.004012921,0.0026119535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685431,0.018495372,0.002846053,0.0050601903,0.0036033178,0.0014518352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028750569,0.0003426188,0.0006971479,0.0017031182,0.0052672396,0.008232699,0.000982781,0.004941904,0.0062424275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07195577,0.00040944878,0.0005755221,0.0019757873,0.022220952,0.015496932,0.0048777545,0.008120529,0.00075539626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029699391,0.00003902162,0.0016048764,0.000070639144,0.000013960424,0.00007132277,0.0049933163,0.00027063393,0.00025749873,0.94001454,0.009544697,0.043089945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000667291,0.00008311535,0.009671561,0.0010168691,0.000038113125,0.0001409197,0.0064408532,0.0004867271,0.0009196816,0.46090072,0.52015644,0.0000782458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011437717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009927214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028750569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056263953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008385305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15204936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747649586","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2017.1363800","title":"The dualisation of unemployment compensation in emerging economies: Brazil, China and Russia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Development and Reform Commission","keywords":"Liberalization; Unemployment; Politics; China; Economics; Welfare; Pace; Social Welfare; Market economy; Compensation (psychology); Earnings; Development economics; Economic system; Labour economics; Political economy; Economic policy; Political science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07217114646183886,"score_gpt":0.4284553904666367,"score_spread":0.35628424400479786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747649586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99161196,0.00032041076,0.00011781803,0.000764828,0.000004877905,0.000008158452,0.00001993737,0.0000015996605,0.007150429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99957544,0.000084696156,0.000023763218,0.000019637506,0.0000013112392,0.0000022064462,0.0000054598822,3.9401718e-7,0.0002871435],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994306,0.00013399172,0.000021645881,0.000045240475,0.00006501464,0.00030342027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99942636,0.00010128797,0.0001917635,0.000039148395,0.00008155538,0.00015976056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009521487,0.00011310165,0.0002481972,0.0008574067,0.0020972386,0.0017088506,0.000342313,0.00039539745,0.0010142206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010819501,0.00009298796,0.0002234236,0.0006076249,0.0029206518,0.00077365024,0.00248118,0.00065886794,0.000034246274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032673794,0.0001838432,0.418036,0.00032688412,0.00011059703,0.004888869,0.14138578,0.0019038083,0.005680227,0.36919007,0.0013003111,0.056666903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038266455,0.00013649525,0.82581425,0.00043046995,0.000071437586,0.0006584915,0.12422693,0.002913189,0.0016320203,0.0124976365,0.03152926,0.000051576895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10154765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16910893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10154765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048497017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048480593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20191318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808542627","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2018.1483256","title":"Radical right framing of social policy in Hungary: between nationalism and populism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Populism, Right-Wing Movements","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Nationalism; Populism; Political science; Political economy; Communism; Chauvinism; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Politics; History","score_opus":0.05382952249114925,"score_gpt":0.40745126552302807,"score_spread":0.3536217430318788,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808542627","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.911265,0.0007396956,0.0027384602,0.0021415951,0.00010494757,0.000032803375,0.000042538537,0.000012969971,0.08292204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99897313,0.00007163364,0.00015474609,0.00006842857,0.000008886053,0.0000056149183,0.0000070894116,0.0000027928666,0.0007075805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978079,0.00094944896,0.00006998374,0.00020848423,0.00034333562,0.00062097167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897254,0.00053375174,0.00020864955,0.00007939521,0.00008692236,0.00011881908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00404936,0.00016825635,0.00033407213,0.0015500676,0.0029779987,0.0053047296,0.0004774516,0.00064991124,0.0016178571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025821344,0.00013894303,0.00022025325,0.0014639965,0.010450573,0.0020091303,0.004195929,0.0013253139,0.00008531428],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020083574,0.000084401814,0.016898923,0.0001395753,0.00003760264,0.0014768856,0.12674093,0.0015201876,0.0013607447,0.81296265,0.0017732035,0.036804073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008891542,0.00025213597,0.2150455,0.0008347125,0.000116038136,0.00049468287,0.3595936,0.0048649386,0.006373726,0.22821242,0.1840065,0.0001168721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008994511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010311721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093621155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0093621155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038227306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06792724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895027516","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2018.1526698","title":"Federalism and the politics of the Canada and Quebec Pension Plans","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs; Georgetown University","keywords":"Federalism; Politics; Scope (computer science); Pension; Public administration; Political science; Plan (archaeology); Benchmarking; Public policy; Pension plan; Economics; Geography; Law; Management","score_opus":0.046604833743162294,"score_gpt":0.35769601732704537,"score_spread":0.3110911835838831,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895027516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4507935,0.011613862,0.001745791,0.09226517,0.00028842126,0.000102324106,0.0009077988,0.000079401136,0.44220382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825769,0.00079754577,0.0002572163,0.001490935,0.000033490316,0.0000135273,0.000058088743,0.000008487835,0.014763756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959726,0.000594958,0.000044662505,0.00022394938,0.0010165033,0.0021472727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99734503,0.00050177943,0.00019308181,0.000088440116,0.0009423253,0.00092934043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027937933,0.00017801617,0.0002731338,0.0018671838,0.013306109,0.006488414,0.00096407626,0.0015624155,0.0053582108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004976595,0.0002559298,0.00034202728,0.0022056282,0.0071581276,0.0010794135,0.0021499044,0.002589703,0.00012885185],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001114568,0.000034819688,0.013594077,0.00004953059,0.000050172013,0.000201536,0.0053655235,0.0019793708,0.00037898257,0.93096,0.021633508,0.025640933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016159668,0.000089082896,0.25747424,0.00058014994,0.00017782825,0.00016041652,0.022554789,0.0052974145,0.0011148369,0.058661252,0.65349406,0.00023432665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99704945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19577943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19577943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14067854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9327819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899620946","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2018.1526700","title":"Childcare deserts and distributional disadvantages: the legacies of split childcare policies and programmes in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Child care; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Work (physics); Early childhood education; State (computer science); Welfare state; Political science; Economic growth; Public policy; Public administration; Order (exchange); Business; Economics; Medicine; Nursing; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.025304221572178546,"score_gpt":0.3487282599398347,"score_spread":0.32342403836765615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899620946","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9187895,0.0029841412,0.00038251575,0.03167995,0.000071409086,0.00005179445,0.00056992105,0.00002387265,0.045446932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996585,0.00060112646,0.00015851935,0.00089847593,0.00000800636,0.000009622578,0.00006122602,0.0000065913437,0.0016714511],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420446,0.0005201826,0.0000959277,0.0003145255,0.0015172685,0.0033476471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929709,0.0008789715,0.00080228114,0.00023853636,0.0022706285,0.0028387555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003463672,0.00019394426,0.0005342448,0.0018235093,0.015947197,0.005646,0.0021526415,0.0010045695,0.0032585443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007270999,0.00024518615,0.0004232034,0.0042879656,0.009614259,0.001280557,0.0062759602,0.0026942524,0.000069701404],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004048635,0.00029743297,0.44149774,0.00038413936,0.00018530602,0.0012064409,0.086536124,0.00384659,0.0011139073,0.3003573,0.023485465,0.14068471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007079986,0.00011107536,0.73159623,0.00094759703,0.00011431963,0.00026286632,0.16772602,0.002198316,0.00066227996,0.017840913,0.07833639,0.00013331977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99514586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16098168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16098168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22078678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9731423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902048484","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2018.1550010","title":"Icon and taboo: single-payer politics in Canada and the US","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Political and Economic history of UK and US","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Taboo; Politics; Government (linguistics); Nexus (standard); Health care; Population; State (computer science); Icon; Public opinion; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Law; Demography","score_opus":0.04781372191573543,"score_gpt":0.3219681240642411,"score_spread":0.27415440214850567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902048484","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2881607,0.014360626,0.00068988255,0.2140167,0.0011856259,0.00007231579,0.00074305217,0.000053613374,0.48071745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95576423,0.003500068,0.00021012448,0.015059082,0.00014109633,0.000021161228,0.00010456529,0.000039200135,0.025160456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932521,0.0007743318,0.00008430472,0.00036495988,0.0021241917,0.0034000683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407226,0.0014910819,0.00030958594,0.00013758049,0.0019277538,0.0020617747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033484066,0.00023323034,0.00048939575,0.003574021,0.031752985,0.011679423,0.0013156891,0.0037226689,0.009566436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008193519,0.00027031158,0.00034897617,0.006046811,0.018494293,0.0022951586,0.003330386,0.006119495,0.0002857486],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111631925,0.00005219808,0.009101268,0.000073498224,0.000028018709,0.0004784129,0.04084349,0.00054311723,0.0002054244,0.84898067,0.07255766,0.027024625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006323456,0.00003311828,0.057381433,0.00059822167,0.0000530547,0.0001588727,0.0901261,0.0015669649,0.00042830227,0.064494275,0.78488636,0.00021015764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99474275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20819056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20819056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1760655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9183867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905345092","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2018.1549090","title":"Policy or window dressing? Exploring the impact of poverty reduction strategies on poverty among the Canadian provinces","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Poverty reduction; Development economics; Culture of poverty; Order (exchange); Economics; Basic needs; Economic growth; Political science","score_opus":0.12186639801456862,"score_gpt":0.4160033993211563,"score_spread":0.2941370013065877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905345092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98450756,0.00043764792,0.00018042565,0.0026501927,0.000014889886,0.000064126194,0.00056017947,0.000010483339,0.011574462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983353,0.00021700092,0.000164082,0.000114009425,0.0000020225782,0.000019979349,0.00009691184,0.0000028909028,0.0010477995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662125,0.00042508243,0.000055338434,0.00016498206,0.0005733337,0.0021600071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99539965,0.0007974295,0.0006282712,0.00015120009,0.0018599516,0.0011634164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019839893,0.00020142682,0.00038698717,0.0015915002,0.0064814403,0.0024385368,0.0015800784,0.0005363232,0.0032249189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075777215,0.00019892596,0.00036063147,0.0031905111,0.00205935,0.0010113674,0.0021778462,0.0010523665,0.00011056731],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005876656,0.00043723604,0.81096315,0.0003233912,0.00013184248,0.00039817498,0.0651519,0.0021635962,0.001416713,0.021274,0.00981887,0.08733347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001643981,0.00013103853,0.84915656,0.00022353439,0.000043950968,0.000028528344,0.12713869,0.0014946793,0.00041852047,0.001047693,0.020245152,0.000055170043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092547596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.092547596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11691111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6714829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914405392","doi":"10.1080/21699763.2019.1568280","title":"Unidentical twins: recent social policy developments in Canada and the United States","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Social policy; Political science; Subsidy; Social Welfare; Federalism; Welfare state; Economic growth; Economics; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.054971971975524656,"score_gpt":0.3779456469644005,"score_spread":0.3229736749888758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914405392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48004934,0.052717518,0.0013152636,0.29764724,0.0027488652,0.00011611904,0.0018126253,0.000074653086,0.1635183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96007246,0.015738308,0.0008966058,0.01304542,0.00028352428,0.000027234335,0.00031559725,0.000021241052,0.009599514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964631,0.00047228235,0.00009718067,0.00023463745,0.0013939401,0.001338818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938426,0.0008607312,0.00050281326,0.0001024494,0.003077417,0.0016140157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031431438,0.000174201,0.00035677533,0.003133081,0.009733392,0.006819868,0.0011838598,0.0022272184,0.0043668016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008869096,0.00020252704,0.000330722,0.006668154,0.0044921874,0.0016509993,0.0026490365,0.0030945218,0.000117631695],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036217674,0.00025074632,0.058893148,0.0005428638,0.00015529696,0.0009823554,0.030681424,0.0036889922,0.00083918724,0.5988546,0.10233142,0.20241785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047349353,0.00008551527,0.25394413,0.0013514321,0.000119132004,0.00017650078,0.06771199,0.0022827112,0.00077182305,0.019964727,0.65333587,0.00020876896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98969626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14022581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14022581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17226242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99721617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3097545215","doi":"10.1017/ics.2020.26","title":"A multinational comparison of care-leaving policy and legislation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":93,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Multinational corporation; Context (archaeology); Vulnerability (computing); Political science; Population; Economic growth; Business; Medicine; Environmental health; Economics; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.07316635324643322,"score_gpt":0.4147591839060233,"score_spread":0.34159283065959006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3097545215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918847,0.00029948464,0.00009284549,0.00057942135,0.000011182339,0.00003745188,0.0001457845,0.0000025793365,0.0069464194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987772,0.00019006964,0.00009780551,0.000098605975,0.0000037575187,0.00003854714,0.00012625627,0.0000034508002,0.0006642638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955349,0.0024454666,0.00027915058,0.00030904956,0.00045642865,0.0009750404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98675644,0.0054950174,0.0044072303,0.0008165547,0.001657943,0.0008668524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008635466,0.00014913965,0.00026375309,0.0018264576,0.0018046646,0.002737011,0.00055999454,0.0003828758,0.004137786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013413709,0.00013436543,0.00022783445,0.0032693956,0.0018984582,0.0015725498,0.0034760116,0.0006640194,0.00016958384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004952979,0.0003603812,0.8450857,0.00041750688,0.00012891964,0.00059951836,0.07886794,0.0007364576,0.00059009506,0.030250102,0.002413788,0.04005422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019294674,0.0001797226,0.86427647,0.00034422285,0.000038979542,0.00006110405,0.124358855,0.0003068544,0.00018073237,0.0004817834,0.009735046,0.000016880904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050584212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06272135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050584212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052033695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037398094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1005795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4311902559","doi":"10.1017/ics.2022.16","title":"Social policies in democratic and authoritarian regimes: comparing the introduction and implementation of the National Rural Employment Guarantee in India and Dibao in China","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; McGill University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Authoritarianism; Livelihood; Democracy; China; Politics; Development economics; Political science; Political economy; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.04439374918151732,"score_gpt":0.3998164414143575,"score_spread":0.3554226922328402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4311902559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9964079,0.00003818818,0.000030849642,0.00032270284,0.000002737051,0.000011898758,0.000019985993,0.0000018410248,0.0031638409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994758,0.000026601221,0.00002424292,0.000034639947,0.0000014303274,0.000008980142,0.000018659444,7.3036e-7,0.00040901933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800414,0.00065688975,0.000073561954,0.000115443036,0.00020614183,0.00094377843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786854,0.00056857936,0.00065912097,0.000121214645,0.00026373848,0.0005187788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001995023,0.00012987606,0.00031441337,0.0013882722,0.0023631407,0.0026111146,0.0007536052,0.0004994558,0.0019421034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003145776,0.00017048251,0.00026415547,0.0016327321,0.0040165815,0.0008033289,0.0034215497,0.0010024374,0.000087667286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005534855,0.00078557327,0.77197903,0.00020124344,0.00018619432,0.0011914271,0.0944667,0.0034266568,0.0033444813,0.07986866,0.0016653377,0.04233124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027975397,0.00016258746,0.93390983,0.000053082607,0.000031455744,0.000038321436,0.05743413,0.0012152051,0.00053530454,0.0017768202,0.004792928,0.000022469903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11593762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18736759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11593762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010745255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23052555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389737632","doi":"10.1017/ics.2023.11","title":"Scales of ideational policy influence: A multi-level, actor-centric, and institutionalist perspective on the role of ideas in African social policy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Community Development and Social Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; McGill University","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Oxford","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Poverty; Political science; Economic geography; Scale (ratio); Positive economics; Economic system; Political economy; Economics; Economic growth; Geography","score_opus":0.11338452856930249,"score_gpt":0.36605892939559137,"score_spread":0.2526744008262889,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389737632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38402697,0.003943478,0.18178737,0.029514093,0.00019523884,0.0003352378,0.00016279217,0.0001586785,0.3998761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99349797,0.0002548086,0.005416777,0.000090423724,0.000025271609,0.000057786743,0.000008933843,0.000010079556,0.00063797145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903036,0.0068827337,0.00032209815,0.0006287237,0.0011494234,0.0007135327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9783036,0.015435029,0.0021336316,0.0019493747,0.0013025152,0.0008757967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011115281,0.0003623658,0.0004544595,0.004043038,0.0028027615,0.012294959,0.0011069835,0.0016820072,0.0040502655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016250027,0.00038079443,0.00071588473,0.0026060555,0.036761697,0.009224802,0.0072772047,0.0026078334,0.00018462959],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016348367,0.000017036631,0.0018822438,0.000042070427,0.000014370779,0.000085822685,0.005645711,0.0014182248,0.00033018956,0.98619056,0.0001479016,0.004209501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029454104,0.000035388806,0.007250068,0.00014520109,0.000032940414,0.000087447006,0.0145282075,0.0048544966,0.00051041326,0.9583343,0.014161816,0.000030252048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018405356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012652406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012294959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071029332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026018312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05878395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389787527","doi":"10.1017/ics.2023.13","title":"International charitable connections: Variation in the countries of operation of overseas charities","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Elite; Language change; Corporate governance; Work (physics); Political science; State (computer science); Public administration; Social policy; Public relations; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Management; Politics","score_opus":0.07115562278108704,"score_gpt":0.3880684258723516,"score_spread":0.3169128030912645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389787527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913011,0.0004678483,0.00024527637,0.0002651387,0.000018286648,0.000013128614,0.0010456031,0.000011086527,0.0066323876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988728,0.00012004592,0.00007592503,0.000020968,0.0000050940675,0.000009642552,0.00038353435,0.00000826245,0.0005035376],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957734,0.0019116236,0.00030047816,0.00057025225,0.00046859492,0.0009756145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9719496,0.009712537,0.009991635,0.0018268016,0.0031313824,0.0033880218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036990917,0.00014565534,0.0003400957,0.0026346094,0.0011197457,0.0028268988,0.000719366,0.00035956505,0.006456301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015889935,0.00016322266,0.00023565876,0.0050727352,0.0012255446,0.0013760738,0.0035930204,0.0007698195,0.000563868],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000102861035,0.000045521632,0.9745239,0.00007307858,0.000115086565,0.0001426931,0.009665656,0.00030805636,0.00018132752,0.0030983416,0.0016514887,0.010091997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031626014,0.000025051959,0.9784184,0.00009571478,0.000018401439,0.000108957094,0.016736425,0.00013019815,0.000080121936,0.00032297333,0.0040477207,0.000012890676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013675064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021176256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013675064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00071200007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068277353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027190924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404220289","doi":"10.1017/ics.2024.11","title":"Tertiary education as social policy: Comparative theoretical perspectives","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Framing (construction); Nexus (standard); Higher education; Human capital; Education policy; Education economics; Function (biology); Public policy; Economics; Government (linguistics); Welfare; Political science; Economic growth; Market economy","score_opus":0.048177631353644446,"score_gpt":0.45192390562519513,"score_spread":0.4037462742715507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404220289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01281259,0.23602222,0.009395244,0.45901746,0.0046029217,0.00004268104,0.0001864393,0.000033894106,0.27788663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.705458,0.21856192,0.004133548,0.04739815,0.0145496745,0.0002875172,0.000189053,0.000062780986,0.009359428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99015105,0.0075056977,0.00023831284,0.00047295672,0.00093067926,0.0007013127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9759814,0.020995757,0.0006250477,0.00057268946,0.0013142147,0.0005108838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010404283,0.00066965615,0.0010863686,0.009383509,0.0043204688,0.012363477,0.002361754,0.008188464,0.008556964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122229885,0.00023315675,0.0008309856,0.00986378,0.027985869,0.008040102,0.0047280774,0.0064507914,0.00047626407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004814625,0.000008573809,0.000065552405,0.00017929997,0.0000034935965,0.000019567131,0.0010760886,0.00029704082,0.000008616384,0.992859,0.0022716483,0.0032063113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014665373,0.000031486736,0.00075845676,0.003884722,0.000016622642,0.000068512156,0.012991545,0.0016353754,0.00012611774,0.7528746,0.22758389,0.000014072986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007920619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007640507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016285839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016285839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006785062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11816257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408377470","doi":"10.1017/ics.2025.14","title":"Gender and work–family balance in the time of pandemic: A comparative study of policy and practice in the UK and South Korea","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy","topic":"Work-Family Balance Challenges","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University Belfast; Queen's University; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Pandemic; Work (physics); Balance (ability); Work–life balance; Gender balance; Political science; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Sociology; Psychology; Gender studies; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.12618986834502824,"score_gpt":0.4272851039174885,"score_spread":0.3010952355724602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408377470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956281,0.0004484295,0.000028092672,0.0011455477,0.00001646512,0.000012079869,0.00002728658,7.9380413e-7,0.0026930976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889106,0.00028238722,0.000021356147,0.00021538172,0.0000037927489,0.000012090471,0.0000102988915,0.0000015865706,0.000562023],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967546,0.0016346379,0.00015688986,0.00019013532,0.00023109112,0.001032669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99584657,0.0015936536,0.0010223421,0.000113386246,0.00035713002,0.0010670121],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036942724,0.0002427623,0.00039869416,0.0013950086,0.0048731486,0.003328843,0.00069026713,0.0010455372,0.004469551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052537774,0.0003983617,0.00030790153,0.0019078554,0.0038705932,0.0025045876,0.004017625,0.0012757223,0.00026416001],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021951085,0.00022288665,0.18306531,0.00026816584,0.000037622456,0.0018158477,0.7882973,0.00009850313,0.00067900884,0.00508461,0.0014193646,0.018791895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057533503,0.000082987615,0.1012569,0.00018954054,0.0000059267836,0.00015196046,0.89326066,0.00003506201,0.00006461314,0.0001283308,0.004804187,0.000014178224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06677507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14440791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06677507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080509335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007149288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1327728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}