{"meta":{"query_hash":"d912d284155d","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management"},"cohort_total":120,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":120,"exported":120,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d912d284155d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Knowledge+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W1499713345","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2014-0469","title":"Understanding “disengagement from knowledge sharing”: engagement theory versus adaptive cost theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Disengagement theory; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.355349396297244,"score_gpt":0.3756608377060894,"score_spread":0.020311441408845388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499713345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031348316,0.004285702,0.061977644,0.000256653,0.0075706826,0.0011104838,0.000007211968,0.00014626484,0.9215105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97153753,0.0007462941,0.0017930397,0.00007356683,0.002189648,0.00005572495,0.000009411315,0.00007918615,0.023515614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941018,0.002100726,0.0011093338,0.0006187126,0.0011430898,0.0009263027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961894,0.0011637853,0.0007344884,0.00060242903,0.0005817614,0.00072809774],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016377727,0.00049182033,0.00066273886,0.00090933335,0.0010558013,0.00044189827,0.0017909186,0.00015548925,0.00070618384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054414524,0.00046334323,0.0004136735,0.0009248269,0.00038345353,0.00079915894,0.0014131069,0.0007570949,0.0006356644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014078725,0.0007379477,0.0006384286,0.000058668018,0.0022082524,0.00014651759,0.05896217,0.00012756212,0.0000031726547,0.8824365,0.020726645,0.03254626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00877736,0.00055961614,0.00059751846,0.0005931826,0.0018884327,0.0000013894629,0.36673036,0.0006032264,0.000037782174,0.18894143,0.43032396,0.0009457444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000025189174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047317968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033641544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031184548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932009746","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2014-0468","title":"Exploring collaboration technology use: how users’ perceptions twist and amend reality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université TÉLUQ; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Perception; Originality; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Dynamics (music); Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.26319867052534235,"score_gpt":0.3638047988533117,"score_spread":0.10060612832796934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932009746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7263582,0.0014194676,0.005015644,0.016736664,0.0031069992,0.00082451134,0.0000039710867,0.00018351569,0.24635106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875976,0.0013749325,0.0015963943,0.00002179475,0.00043963667,0.000018786339,0.0000013049788,0.000013186405,0.008936372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867046,0.00017777193,0.0003197174,0.0001869771,0.0003694574,0.00027562794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987152,0.000045797675,0.00024834,0.0001800479,0.00060285046,0.0002077228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016996192,0.0001306432,0.00023024222,0.0006512633,0.00036373915,0.0004245772,0.0002953802,0.00006217665,0.000017950395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002825121,0.00012719289,0.000055594403,0.0009572096,0.00020064047,0.0014780172,0.0002402284,0.00017550614,0.000027092792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013233986,0.00067606877,0.06820943,0.00026035306,0.0007095718,0.00017907977,0.11801813,0.000062880375,0.00012537854,0.54680234,0.088515386,0.17630902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009313246,0.00013738881,0.010625086,0.00012353696,0.00018542005,0.0000038511143,0.18465602,0.00011057225,0.000018675164,0.0020753224,0.800907,0.00022575958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024087067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011148226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7123917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039455545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000079171055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5186776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959212851","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2015-0058","title":"Living Lab as knowledge system: an actual approach for managing urban service projects?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Society for Arts and Technology; Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; General partnership; Context (archaeology); Normative; Service (business); Body of knowledge; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.0588782441519511,"score_gpt":0.2786829365997607,"score_spread":0.2198046924478096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959212851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04826832,0.0008893992,0.04359034,0.00049014477,0.0028870779,0.001821409,0.0000018503222,0.00039288396,0.9016586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978178,0.00000967418,0.015615592,0.00053340173,0.0027026762,0.00014381863,0.000019035104,0.00007899542,0.0027187963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772716,0.00007447596,0.00086945336,0.0004058829,0.00038496044,0.00053805154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704134,0.00005793106,0.00083353807,0.0003472528,0.0016654151,0.000054510467],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044335043,0.00037076612,0.00056075474,0.0010512724,0.00039067725,0.00028509664,0.0010385055,0.00018779867,0.000010661164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015416025,0.00033267596,0.00014904277,0.0014516158,0.00008533667,0.0013253308,0.0008705374,0.00037221258,0.00014310952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026748583,0.0016362399,0.0022605245,0.004910303,0.0008283318,0.000051759198,0.010963632,0.000074032374,0.000018015871,0.9094708,0.03492758,0.03459129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007301404,0.00061402377,0.0037311001,0.0021204418,0.0015650465,0.00012085438,0.33241552,0.043918677,0.0001395954,0.016066698,0.58954906,0.002457553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015462974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001654642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9299097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004827922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014546291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966353786","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2013-0183","title":"The quasi-moderating role of organizational culture in the relationship between rewards and knowledge shared and gained","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Organizational learning; Originality; Organizational culture; Knowledge value chain; Bridge (graph theory); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Knowledge transfer; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Creativity","score_opus":0.02987038917237334,"score_gpt":0.30908836214223195,"score_spread":0.2792179729698586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966353786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3253833,0.012407106,0.0026350021,0.0037716166,0.0005160755,0.001032228,0.0000040472382,0.000035556146,0.6542151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966888,0.00024729496,0.00038991054,0.000019270012,0.00043536507,0.0000054308225,0.0000020904683,0.000009604558,0.0022022612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982443,0.000591223,0.00050390715,0.00013736609,0.00031928488,0.00020391721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982195,0.0010278018,0.00030206805,0.00013796492,0.0002491806,0.000063487896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047532604,0.0001161004,0.00020657475,0.0001767419,0.0007793707,0.0002199116,0.000426497,0.00006099787,0.0000082622955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010658226,0.00007337649,0.000050764796,0.00052982377,0.00016595352,0.00022110759,0.00019983282,0.00022512709,0.0000047433005],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017011456,0.0001131541,0.38742638,0.00011273226,0.00008891595,0.0000015613792,0.07663398,0.000004649718,0.000007769869,0.50457203,0.002342177,0.028679647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001570367,0.00020718444,0.6769658,0.0004522091,0.00025341898,0.000003063481,0.06796383,0.0014236849,0.000011915557,0.06967703,0.18118678,0.00028472478],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009447097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005423837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6713055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006382437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047306454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5994368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970683543","doi":"10.1108/13673271211218843","title":"Classifying organizations by knowledge intensity – necessary next‐steps","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Knowledge management; Originality; Leverage (statistics); Foundation (evidence); Empirical research; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Engineering; Creativity; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027926655199130332,"score_gpt":0.2569526376823654,"score_spread":0.22902598248323508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970683543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008945892,0.0034735305,0.005335169,0.0010998657,0.0064001624,0.000497214,0.000001894276,0.00017050937,0.97407573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98309755,0.00012806225,0.00075223227,0.0015885192,0.0041884254,0.000014459618,0.000032853368,0.00008598063,0.0101119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731654,0.000045886576,0.0011691937,0.00029209533,0.00045962466,0.00071664946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966259,0.000050960796,0.0009579372,0.00041921917,0.0018595785,0.00008643141],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001730998,0.00042399848,0.0005518204,0.001294286,0.00044462504,0.00046982593,0.0007725898,0.00011866641,0.00045512378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016887736,0.00038312934,0.00020774204,0.0028681953,0.00009503273,0.0026631227,0.00092468475,0.00042229885,0.0023960255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070178954,0.0020497162,0.015240899,0.0008715076,0.00046810962,0.000021835607,0.0006356091,0.0000042073198,0.00029661675,0.38793603,0.56612813,0.02627714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014260662,0.000029697547,0.004129938,0.00022092843,0.00042906596,0.000017262399,0.0063811303,0.0006577758,0.00014394597,0.00090841897,0.9851147,0.0005410538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000040097966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000015822681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9741517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028805356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040220388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998621},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977446819","doi":"10.1108/13673270510629945","title":"Explaining the intentions to share and reuse knowledge in the context of IT service operations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Object Research Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Reuse; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge value chain; Computer science; Service (business); Personal knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Body of knowledge; Originality; Business; Organizational learning; Marketing; Engineering; Qualitative research; Sociology","score_opus":0.06193504452374096,"score_gpt":0.3487312126555949,"score_spread":0.28679616813185393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977446819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13699378,0.0033086545,0.0006675137,0.06850137,0.00075539766,0.0012960321,0.0000048357288,0.000022782453,0.78844965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944268,0.00037947105,0.00061699183,0.0009149579,0.0003896084,0.000033930824,8.7706724e-7,0.000009831049,0.0032275198],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821717,0.00042681853,0.00060258585,0.00014867824,0.00034958386,0.00025518332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987239,0.00029211925,0.00014796025,0.00032517192,0.00042550912,0.00008530561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041876803,0.00012609157,0.00021547977,0.0003714293,0.0005205676,0.00018679301,0.0012521801,0.00003815494,0.00009645322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030090535,0.000081999286,0.00009309115,0.00096598355,0.00008877083,0.00036211853,0.0005243889,0.00022724245,0.00006714648],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006107558,0.0007246603,0.0017658256,0.00017103384,0.00026501957,0.00001585072,0.62094724,0.0002881126,0.000051168445,0.18976852,0.07200492,0.11393656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006121259,0.00006599312,0.004841593,0.00038665903,0.00011899937,0.0000026715447,0.32342952,0.00070326414,0.000016379883,0.00017752578,0.6695184,0.000126847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005901613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03525078,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.857433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012949496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000065761036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9823534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978538169","doi":"10.1108/13673271311315141","title":"Three shapes of organisational knowledge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Knowledge management; Typology; Knowledge value chain; Explicit knowledge; Originality; Production (economics); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Domain knowledge; Organizational learning; Body of knowledge; Sociology; Qualitative research; Economics","score_opus":0.021534643785210354,"score_gpt":0.23723092958299585,"score_spread":0.2156962857977855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978538169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024445029,0.00062386855,0.0043823672,0.0010022769,0.0016894356,0.00067114556,9.996837e-7,0.00006409058,0.96712077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99173534,0.000027299891,0.002560414,0.00043309014,0.0019192342,0.000020693458,0.0000061479477,0.00004715528,0.0032506112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976609,0.000017821998,0.0012505413,0.00024229039,0.00048259346,0.00034585438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965717,0.000055427412,0.0010776762,0.0002657274,0.0019962983,0.00003312316],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000964888,0.00029675858,0.0004718076,0.0013836427,0.00014489036,0.00021098298,0.0007519861,0.000074088595,0.0020477974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008143965,0.00025174036,0.0002443056,0.0013311849,0.00010277195,0.001054433,0.00056822435,0.00020939136,0.002884152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003512194,0.00093400135,0.0029189216,0.00092318177,0.00037355613,0.000011521529,0.00023191032,0.000013206141,0.00037774397,0.8334309,0.116267115,0.04448286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005072095,0.00018408905,0.08560048,0.00072391104,0.00069334795,0.000018092514,0.005592935,0.008261808,0.00039241495,0.083816506,0.8085568,0.0010875307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011986765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003970284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96729034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011652878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047662186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980887383","doi":"10.1108/13673271311315231","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Journal ranking; Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation impact; Reputation; Originality; Knowledge management; Pace; Citation analysis; Computer science; Business; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.01855700776200159,"score_gpt":0.2555728564973881,"score_spread":0.2370158487353865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980887383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7473569,0.029109627,0.0024947338,0.000714633,0.001639063,0.00073495694,0.000003699297,0.00005609341,0.21789032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98777235,0.0078383405,0.00049947225,0.00033407874,0.0012951916,0.000017472465,0.000005283523,0.000036329584,0.00220148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689764,0.000049390434,0.0015131914,0.0003475405,0.0006061729,0.00058608415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99755853,0.00008736817,0.0010579227,0.0002914817,0.0009209839,0.000083725856],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012812245,0.00044497554,0.0007670128,0.0014562263,0.00024326562,0.00033013528,0.0008691519,0.0001376044,0.0017718076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008063858,0.0003582995,0.00040565513,0.0014757583,0.00017929958,0.002073169,0.00097387534,0.00046732937,0.0015311646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005404241,0.0012102757,0.022947367,0.0042497115,0.0043257847,0.00013621939,0.0036859796,0.00035071533,0.00015522804,0.05762831,0.491226,0.413544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009496293,0.0006629492,0.08815403,0.004375998,0.005898171,0.00032442546,0.03126781,0.025403928,0.00030972308,0.046232365,0.78485566,0.003018628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000047088128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000043783206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41052538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015682471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025513342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991768282","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2014-0061","title":"Trouble with tacit: developing a new perspective and approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Organizational Learning and Leadership","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Originality; Perspective (graphical); Phenomenon; Action (physics); Explicit knowledge; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Extant taxon; Knowledge management; Empirical research; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02015747275111354,"score_gpt":0.21936480240056613,"score_spread":0.1992073296494526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991768282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027294476,0.0010162288,0.23740885,0.008412496,0.00044642124,0.00033010106,1.2025158e-7,0.00009463687,0.7249967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799878,0.00001166876,0.0132402815,0.0005893657,0.0018010872,0.0000014028155,0.0000012726814,0.00002807186,0.004339069],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992417,0.00001673155,0.0002068059,0.00015590304,0.00021395368,0.0001649176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992967,0.000025732657,0.00026006383,0.00008576454,0.00030731576,0.000024373878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045518234,0.00013259832,0.00019009154,0.0003404794,0.00012562,0.00021683979,0.00016454764,0.000028091616,0.000025901123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007117285,0.00009997953,0.000036179208,0.00043743628,0.000033620687,0.00048888545,0.00008438819,0.00015243585,0.00005329114],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012178715,0.00014078023,0.012925703,0.0004719537,0.00026703763,0.000013737314,0.001242586,0.0003350538,0.0000087866365,0.9579156,0.011059035,0.015497932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005805431,0.0001986386,0.08184836,0.00064946135,0.00062391034,0.00009910109,0.022995308,0.004443834,0.000026527448,0.015175059,0.86731285,0.0008215393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011135853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000072812795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9526933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006852863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032741613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40770468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992573885","doi":"10.1108/13673270710832181","title":"A systems‐based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Absorptive capacity; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Knowledge base; Knowledge value chain; Originality; Systems thinking; Complex adaptive system; Dissemination; Management science; Organizational learning; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.16963118855940812,"score_gpt":0.4042498183079086,"score_spread":0.2346186297485005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992573885","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050184105,0.003636881,0.81588876,0.00005948738,0.0024311007,0.00036528773,0.00000611786,0.000029920075,0.12739836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9841002,0.000008918065,0.0046566334,0.000050372502,0.00024541692,0.00000492095,2.4913504e-7,0.000028842303,0.010904416],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370706,0.00032956037,0.0028659368,0.00048203813,0.0020732356,0.00054218067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952996,0.0012202113,0.0006227627,0.0008411882,0.001628532,0.00038774672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014974995,0.00032189826,0.0008639244,0.0019991705,0.00024216973,0.0004158658,0.0015580253,0.000117286916,0.00010472074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037444124,0.00022507379,0.0006202713,0.0014884289,0.00008766029,0.000362133,0.00020358991,0.00035857636,0.0004303819],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013933025,0.0039290627,0.002277179,0.00086009846,0.00084719225,0.0010749273,0.008872212,0.12348771,0.0018539793,0.35248995,0.14496529,0.35794908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029990883,0.00027940853,0.004934507,0.00061764766,0.00015134944,0.00014700553,0.0030986082,0.759177,0.000069746806,0.014670046,0.21329951,0.00055607036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000037344512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014837834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93391615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039010998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013996566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91782427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997808463","doi":"10.1108/13673270210450432","title":"A knowledge management reference model","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Computer science; Construct (python library); Structuring; Blueprint; Conceptual model; Reference model; Process management; Management science; Business; Software engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.06991347479793608,"score_gpt":0.27195534194619364,"score_spread":0.20204186714825756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997808463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035293398,0.0042227022,0.008865464,0.00028902653,0.0012706955,0.00040427689,0.0000016133869,0.00009798638,0.9813189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94548935,0.0013126602,0.0022032,0.00046097158,0.0016117791,0.000033604363,0.0000032337214,0.00006729739,0.048817903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728256,0.000032648037,0.0010875075,0.00046320152,0.00051502,0.0006190607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978096,0.000057657133,0.00065146125,0.00055413146,0.0008542553,0.00007291136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081374316,0.00046073025,0.0005544029,0.0013395273,0.00025808092,0.00032087247,0.0012769676,0.00009404599,0.0010623337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039827486,0.00040740406,0.00035638653,0.0011609513,0.000112955044,0.0011085562,0.0009291161,0.0004137654,0.006500466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009277256,0.0020681117,0.0004731654,0.0013440772,0.00050837814,0.000351932,0.00048458317,0.0003334389,0.00005885975,0.61986923,0.13382477,0.2405907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013539586,0.0000693176,0.0007331318,0.00071110344,0.0004781092,0.000027254342,0.001113932,0.049700443,0.000068884285,0.008717323,0.93636453,0.00066202955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000026422235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000035314355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94196004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019566996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001539511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003665551","doi":"10.1108/13673270710752162","title":"IT for KM in the management consulting industry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Computer science; Enabling; Workflow; Service (business); Data management; The Internet; Business; World Wide Web; Data mining; Database","score_opus":0.03891106876844171,"score_gpt":0.3073430211284606,"score_spread":0.26843195236001893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003665551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030539244,0.0008306809,0.016051821,0.0021924148,0.001855248,0.0011042246,0.0000012728476,0.000028206996,0.9473969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908236,0.00007229139,0.001643513,0.0024081897,0.00225527,0.000030120755,0.0000030765523,0.000028694983,0.0027352339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980283,0.000020735588,0.00090688094,0.00022334221,0.00035509685,0.00046568998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854636,0.00024897428,0.0004995793,0.0002561782,0.00042690293,0.000022028358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004310587,0.00022427355,0.00027911927,0.0008620471,0.00017231613,0.00020857355,0.0008632572,0.0000913343,0.00009886375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008980915,0.00016496389,0.00020295846,0.00094471074,0.00006335975,0.00044241044,0.00028310838,0.00044406194,0.0001764443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004917787,0.0015800543,0.013839889,0.0021210732,0.0005388061,0.00091105717,0.0018180548,0.000087640154,0.000048856626,0.51485115,0.08058941,0.3831222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013647395,0.00004185732,0.015555068,0.00054987613,0.00020342052,0.000017160182,0.01307658,0.0003076738,0.00006647259,0.0038631414,0.96470463,0.00024936392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004802277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015381063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96028435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010834963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014147049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6727032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022807203","doi":"10.1108/13673270910997088","title":"Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":791,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational performance; Business; Knowledge management; Excellence; Originality; Organizational learning; Formative assessment; Operational excellence; Organizational culture; Value (mathematics); Exploratory research; Best practice; Marketing; Psychology; Public relations; Management; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.015896551925703283,"score_gpt":0.23411687994003821,"score_spread":0.21822032801433494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022807203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6414494,0.0024695983,0.0018010502,0.00024012342,0.0005857223,0.00028753898,0.0000013557922,0.00008488912,0.3530803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937377,0.00086177274,0.0005371774,0.0006058631,0.0011805008,0.000005226677,0.000024871772,0.000023398581,0.003023476],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981078,0.000027630787,0.00074643636,0.00032487742,0.00043789038,0.00035537555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985035,0.000018273387,0.00044566047,0.0003065951,0.00066291663,0.00006304163],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00089402706,0.0003166881,0.0005068711,0.002494793,0.00032614867,0.000333373,0.0005073814,0.00006760942,0.00046291723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013794241,0.00026537437,0.00024521264,0.003100544,0.00006226978,0.0020473076,0.00024646008,0.00020564423,0.00037947824],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010656704,0.0061878194,0.09709096,0.0030917518,0.013077876,0.00037144902,0.0075331065,0.002929978,0.00018319575,0.29646423,0.057231694,0.5147723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00578908,0.0011610405,0.43296298,0.00056999316,0.020121492,0.000055962075,0.016578939,0.0825203,0.00026777943,0.009747597,0.42751345,0.002711383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000012523814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000021208534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5120609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009321678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018850878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038208731","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2013-0448","title":"Organizational structure and knowledge-practice diffusion in the MNC","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Multinational corporation; Interdependence; Knowledge sharing; Business; Organizational structure; Originality; Knowledge value chain; Organizational learning; Computer science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.009282660652158181,"score_gpt":0.2358800156340489,"score_spread":0.2265973549818907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038208731","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02620124,0.0006649,0.0012324242,0.0040149223,0.0015185175,0.00042225549,5.970915e-7,0.000031942516,0.9659132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99331194,0.00006448522,0.00070979627,0.002898723,0.0019287696,0.000005117796,0.0000075234284,0.000027380373,0.0010462664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833506,0.00010531939,0.00067549775,0.00022536227,0.0004041897,0.00025455304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829423,0.00016407778,0.0005440824,0.00025677902,0.0007228184,0.000017993398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021974486,0.00023108356,0.00026865632,0.0008910482,0.00022330308,0.0003642673,0.0005577585,0.000063352316,0.00010956283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003717668,0.00015984735,0.00006502208,0.0014788416,0.000063946914,0.00070299325,0.0004387578,0.00030979715,0.00015276403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052982952,0.00045639978,0.0034843564,0.00033050377,0.00006623258,0.000022631015,0.00072271476,0.000008095463,0.000038182297,0.95573366,0.011698643,0.027385581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021949983,0.000049145812,0.017547693,0.00016975572,0.00021246563,0.000034907476,0.004640201,0.0026346194,0.000009933959,0.024973975,0.94723535,0.0002969784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000037662842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005723202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9671107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007201286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020153535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65183854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042635584","doi":"10.1108/13673270010315957","title":"Network Map: visualizing telecommunications service","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Telecommunications service; Telecommunications; Relation (database); Service provider; Service (business); Order (exchange); Path (computing); Knowledge management; Telecommunications network; World Wide Web; Business; Database; Computer network; Marketing","score_opus":0.030266752621583307,"score_gpt":0.3152555174567208,"score_spread":0.2849887648351375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042635584","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005702043,0.0029553347,0.7074846,0.006787646,0.0009140446,0.00020504784,0.0000017898069,0.00012289463,0.28095847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33998206,0.006519427,0.57686985,0.017006794,0.0021424743,0.00001822053,0.000035718065,0.00009100011,0.05733442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989332,0.00010308842,0.0004531315,0.00011483031,0.00020680166,0.00018894575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989434,0.00004255838,0.00019431803,0.0005187229,0.00020395582,0.00009703246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058070506,0.00009605522,0.00015355163,0.00014219209,0.00015438556,0.00018441824,0.0015251383,0.000023662287,0.00020235652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000061900364,0.00008675098,0.00006869605,0.0008379737,0.000013124609,0.00044444628,0.00031095702,0.00011768577,0.00049128104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010440111,0.0006480697,0.0002311625,0.00012573741,0.00024354942,0.00004394351,0.0013587173,0.0050369943,0.0000074952413,0.3710528,0.26374033,0.35750073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035514182,0.00004375056,0.00057328533,0.00013629388,0.0000383871,0.000017020504,0.000093452094,0.045083985,0.00000890592,0.002495439,0.9510308,0.00012354644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000011103979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008934033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68729043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048771417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031858075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6314588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048416284","doi":"10.1108/13673270810902939","title":"<i>Places Rated Almanacs</i> and roll out neoliberalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Foregrounding; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Neoliberalism (international relations); Originality; Relevance (law); Sociology; Explanatory power; Competitive advantage; Political science; Marketing; Business; Political economy; Social science; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04970308707949492,"score_gpt":0.29385870564529326,"score_spread":0.24415561856579834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048416284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18415958,0.00786281,0.00009264726,0.01896591,0.002216395,0.00043600684,0.0000017010692,0.00005239136,0.78621256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5108265,0.008313882,0.00074868003,0.0005843851,0.0007776948,0.000004666826,0.0000012950592,0.000013493893,0.4787294],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988803,0.0000977635,0.0003515992,0.000112371396,0.0003188428,0.00023907585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929476,0.00003709811,0.00020621163,0.00007092081,0.00021144567,0.00017953786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055102125,0.00011144641,0.00020773851,0.00011668665,0.0004402082,0.000059613114,0.000217882,0.00005908767,0.00017731596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030317682,0.00008589155,0.00006779558,0.0002221067,0.00016949356,0.00023171259,0.000096850534,0.00014904239,0.000036975787],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036979403,0.000098328186,0.0020381466,0.000019781895,0.0001704642,0.00021516622,0.02241043,0.0000062470267,0.000013458578,0.005964256,0.9485577,0.020469047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005661705,0.00004686244,0.0040084743,0.000047464328,0.00003836987,0.000022166427,0.0055190455,0.00000565954,0.00005007367,0.00038031253,0.9891934,0.000122011246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000065591936,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038497543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32666692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013079829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089363966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35025558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050991272","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000005868","title":"The who, what and why of knowledge mapping","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Intellectual capital; Knowledge value chain; Organizational memory; Process (computing); Computer science; Personal knowledge management; Business","score_opus":0.027383096189470876,"score_gpt":0.2541308014971049,"score_spread":0.226747705307634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050991272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11386972,0.07632031,0.0077764015,0.0031115266,0.0048743533,0.00068779005,6.6837e-7,0.00005505999,0.79330415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9722139,0.015603099,0.000194487,0.00039964708,0.0023219956,0.000010827037,9.580928e-7,0.000039912764,0.009215136],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834895,0.000038473732,0.00079973944,0.00020862909,0.00027047802,0.0003337503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798197,0.00021020892,0.0006351234,0.0002848276,0.0008537529,0.000034130007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013062407,0.00023387553,0.00038428334,0.00054899894,0.0002968666,0.000477323,0.0006310242,0.00004810192,0.00010556593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102742735,0.00016452148,0.00020046094,0.0008073065,0.00018547385,0.001329781,0.000592415,0.00021695015,0.00016765826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016125242,0.0004987392,0.009061107,0.0008504868,0.00042537518,0.00010100537,0.0009799211,0.000010742188,0.00017104526,0.15412818,0.037277147,0.796335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052002416,0.000043005413,0.008285907,0.0010370325,0.00012588057,0.00002570458,0.0048256414,0.00074419245,0.00009781941,0.004801627,0.9792918,0.00020138275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007387845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013694275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94201463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054618726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002329192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67089915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052495896","doi":"10.1108/13673270210417664","title":"Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":891,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Competitive advantage; Process (computing); Knowledge value chain; Set (abstract data type); Key (lock); Computer science; Organizational learning; Conceptual framework; Business; Conceptual model; Process management; Marketing; Sociology","score_opus":0.019403041489920482,"score_gpt":0.2845775252730982,"score_spread":0.2651744837831777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052495896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003176271,0.004620736,0.028359925,0.0044967895,0.0017216981,0.0012588254,0.0000022325894,0.00015559212,0.95620793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885632,0.000841731,0.0036631424,0.0023402807,0.0024322032,0.00009523207,0.000005566701,0.00007302453,0.00198564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777544,0.00011321726,0.00089359394,0.00045815544,0.00031344692,0.000446179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977428,0.0002390778,0.0004821531,0.00043985125,0.0010267881,0.000069344875],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001418398,0.0004307554,0.00050632557,0.0014543866,0.00044000315,0.0005131979,0.0006006747,0.00011176279,0.00014406594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019088874,0.00037016356,0.00018359732,0.0014400219,0.0001368761,0.0031801846,0.0003482631,0.0005669899,0.00046969554],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072093404,0.0010181102,0.00015393959,0.00030308365,0.00033002254,0.000031667067,0.001329852,0.0000064198316,0.000020845624,0.7720627,0.005270424,0.21940081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003591198,0.0004841153,0.0040038256,0.0011350658,0.0015647269,0.000069865935,0.017858297,0.010025499,0.00006186762,0.1434575,0.8165199,0.0012281322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000004137257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000019890325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853869,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019578011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011592177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066550266","doi":"10.1108/13670410529073","title":"Establishing a global KM initiative: the Wipro story","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Indian Economic and Social Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"RealNetworks (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Outsourcing; Competitive advantage; Knowledge management; Customer needs; Knowledge sharing; Value (mathematics); Marketing; Competitive intelligence; Knowledge economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03186474971320101,"score_gpt":0.23283983838268565,"score_spread":0.20097508866948466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066550266","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075895205,0.006853909,0.012672206,0.0049890103,0.0040415395,0.00037325185,0.000034069326,0.000020371157,0.89512044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513704,0.00041341767,0.0019166949,0.00069184066,0.00043557258,0.000008169309,0.000001359674,0.000013285324,0.0013826261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989083,0.000026198042,0.0006357214,0.00014746205,0.00004589681,0.00023644499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990799,0.00003216525,0.00060376344,0.00014896452,0.000059284153,0.000075928714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014364274,0.00012037459,0.0002899573,0.00014274656,0.00022359555,0.00011080168,0.00042698672,0.00004844103,0.00008636808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006519216,0.0001063603,0.00015731824,0.00021918537,0.00006335253,0.000337727,0.000121181474,0.00021448689,0.0005115629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018304732,0.00016935419,0.0057420316,0.000042429197,0.0003542377,0.000052195846,0.0061053075,0.00017613794,1.3275451e-7,0.9617455,0.012804498,0.012789897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018653229,0.000098458746,0.09769328,0.00008819217,0.000029662811,0.000022494009,0.0042510605,0.000021693806,0.0000061842084,0.16369803,0.7319393,0.00028627412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000072029798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022750324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91924185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010833949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008959031,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6575277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069956476","doi":"10.1108/13673270410541015","title":"Knowledge‐related asymmetries in strategic alliances","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Knowledge management; Business; Realization (probability); Stability (learning theory); Strategic alliance; Industrial organization; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.032788235050538087,"score_gpt":0.26761822513790795,"score_spread":0.23482999008736988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069956476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04014347,0.0022952384,0.0002555075,0.00093548227,0.0025751747,0.00042807765,4.611566e-7,0.00007827103,0.9532883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99384105,0.00018087166,0.0006443619,0.00038323496,0.00095064315,0.000016866847,0.0000062452345,0.000044647295,0.003932085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997281,0.00003064874,0.0014089587,0.0003370494,0.00042338803,0.00051891926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814993,0.00003420355,0.0008209403,0.00030287157,0.00065726496,0.000034810673],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016694701,0.00037154637,0.0005367713,0.0026125803,0.00015833201,0.0003512647,0.00076261075,0.00010665205,0.00016414233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006110906,0.00032910763,0.00022840548,0.0035050581,0.000107912965,0.0010580879,0.00038453133,0.00040909948,0.0015795424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067083565,0.0010843575,0.0017582258,0.00057417346,0.00019328382,0.00019572371,0.0002957907,0.00026855743,0.00002044467,0.9801735,0.002056563,0.013312252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015509951,0.0002551287,0.021848684,0.002074656,0.00049699144,0.00003989409,0.017563727,0.0013560376,0.00018479335,0.35767537,0.58141536,0.0015793832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011782445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021577082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95369756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003529562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000080686536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076239839","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2014-0220","title":"Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part I: articles and their characteristics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Normative; Originality; Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Maturity (psychological); Sociology; Performative utterance; Library science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Social science; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.08429222483228879,"score_gpt":0.3240416567415362,"score_spread":0.23974943190924738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076239839","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13371398,0.0071979947,0.0020091685,0.0020282895,0.0037811683,0.0008494842,0.0000030393187,0.000074192634,0.8503427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98477376,0.0030586433,0.00083900994,0.00007469541,0.0009859761,0.000020793575,0.0000031922107,0.000031317508,0.010212638],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692816,0.00047206736,0.0011492288,0.00031248457,0.00055594166,0.00058211456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978848,0.00013743227,0.00061542186,0.00026265837,0.0006482363,0.0004514322],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066157086,0.00028134647,0.0005106113,0.0012934026,0.0002814371,0.0006920997,0.00064919895,0.00010713898,0.0000901774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028744186,0.00024215679,0.00014339584,0.0012742013,0.00018518552,0.001093897,0.00046458252,0.00037329237,0.00007828476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021129676,0.0013712016,0.02939185,0.00044758586,0.00063770363,0.0002502164,0.0729752,0.000015367812,0.000011519333,0.15422751,0.051975045,0.6884855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032730454,0.00020790288,0.034877628,0.0008776673,0.0002451534,0.000009087803,0.08468095,0.0007893666,0.000022439532,0.016839514,0.85764766,0.0005295916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000070807946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039938127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8510598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005170799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010949134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079387804","doi":"10.1108/13673270410567648","title":"Innovation in the knowing organization: a case study of an e‐commerce initiative","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Innovation Council; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sensemaking; Knowledge management; Openness to experience; Business; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Set (abstract data type); Knowledge sharing; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04420585512517853,"score_gpt":0.29138479798713646,"score_spread":0.24717894286195793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079387804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8461674,0.000039403683,0.0009989782,0.00049807923,0.00051774463,0.00075474655,2.570746e-7,0.000021599491,0.15100181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804485,0.0000036835702,0.00034411135,0.00092745066,0.0005615517,0.000013002586,0.0000058318424,0.000024327355,0.00007516442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789226,0.00007312391,0.0012482115,0.00018420453,0.00040973915,0.00019243736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972509,0.000032771146,0.000971351,0.00030293624,0.0014333788,0.000008674595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002276269,0.00019471193,0.00028975884,0.0018730593,0.00018893105,0.00018243724,0.0005148888,0.000038851016,0.00003492816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012718663,0.00014823682,0.00004509274,0.0060537593,0.000035443274,0.001116904,0.00024241881,0.0002375794,0.000035657275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010035437,0.0115036275,0.011845635,0.0006554059,0.00036458246,0.0044260444,0.029470064,0.00092024624,0.000039870134,0.9027425,0.0011385913,0.036793087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017655743,0.0009763212,0.042541526,0.00062055566,0.0007392044,0.0006140328,0.8951853,0.00072080136,0.00009551942,0.01254155,0.027460515,0.0008489426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040625182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032593217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8902009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012884905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033699827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6044922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085098328","doi":"10.1108/13673271011050120","title":"Are full and partial knowledge sharing the same?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Situational ethics; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Originality; Computer science","score_opus":0.03653689969233438,"score_gpt":0.3175679301266231,"score_spread":0.28103103043428873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085098328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2750395,0.0029104406,0.0004858886,0.002604786,0.0051723276,0.000532709,0.000001013252,0.00006951797,0.7131838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766757,0.00043351675,0.00031723228,0.000088751396,0.0023329367,0.000012835571,3.038705e-7,0.000022964494,0.020115752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822825,0.0001498294,0.00053193857,0.0002591739,0.00037243523,0.00045837575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848026,0.00015633281,0.0005291664,0.0003259303,0.00028222,0.00022610236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033089593,0.00019772108,0.00029915344,0.00029843257,0.0008865347,0.0003851516,0.0010145906,0.00009082067,0.00023164245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024538045,0.0001442877,0.00017195413,0.00045342316,0.00032823975,0.00035771355,0.0006881859,0.0005683147,0.0001513577],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012574157,0.0007653918,0.04102205,0.00035377525,0.0007703846,0.00016711172,0.045828022,0.000008397836,0.00022490551,0.63171494,0.04331684,0.23570246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007456669,0.000052976327,0.016650785,0.00013927577,0.00024515187,0.000009644927,0.0136815645,0.0003751816,0.000036570655,0.0032575014,0.96455246,0.00025321683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000013615498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00250361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9212356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008002092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004560438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68185973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085429409","doi":"10.1108/13673271011032337","title":"Research paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies: 1998‐2007","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Personal knowledge management; Originality; Body of knowledge; Citation; Knowledge value chain; Citation analysis; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Organizational learning; Data science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.15411087719495636,"score_gpt":0.44869040560739837,"score_spread":0.294579528412442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085429409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0231007,0.01042948,0.00016624895,0.00039818985,0.0055553797,0.0009965688,0.0000021108979,0.000056822,0.9592945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9395293,0.0041066003,0.0015674208,0.00003242413,0.0017120495,0.00004309225,0.0000018944942,0.00004641198,0.052960783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99500734,0.00072940846,0.0014945712,0.0004673332,0.0014000467,0.000901298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639636,0.00058339344,0.00071014016,0.0006781682,0.0012511812,0.00038072633],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013619723,0.00034452384,0.0008071226,0.0018844274,0.0007952306,0.00016278599,0.0019147818,0.00016955574,0.0001738471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024896028,0.00030836696,0.00041487426,0.0018526468,0.0009898702,0.00056752993,0.0011828978,0.0010044158,0.0005183942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018922547,0.0018390493,0.003557509,0.0016298009,0.0025461423,0.00035468736,0.032816973,0.000005555397,0.000071560884,0.6578772,0.21378295,0.08532935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015098134,0.00021748703,0.0016070105,0.00059842766,0.00021659872,0.000003383251,0.06771846,0.000034901957,0.000098944045,0.005075291,0.9226042,0.00031545458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021369427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005712314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9164286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035278086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021842791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090475760","doi":"10.1108/13673270710762747","title":"Rapid knowledge work visualization for organizations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Business Process Modeling and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Computer science; Visualization; Work (physics); Data science; Data mining; Engineering","score_opus":0.02289148838525654,"score_gpt":0.27940647280527126,"score_spread":0.2565149844200147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090475760","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009083049,0.003084364,0.91698617,0.00048790924,0.0017420149,0.00037017337,8.405263e-7,0.00011360651,0.06813185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908176,0.0001409186,0.0026065256,0.0003115968,0.003329354,0.000008319176,0.00002354871,0.00006209694,0.0027000178],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984148,0.000009232785,0.00080491224,0.00020987196,0.00024176869,0.00031941518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966427,0.00006747301,0.00066175795,0.0001845665,0.002413045,0.000030443163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016453345,0.00020872682,0.00032938123,0.0012030173,0.00028754366,0.00023623598,0.00038588635,0.000072789146,0.000101290185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019611926,0.00018359961,0.00018923538,0.003058008,0.000033587363,0.00073863595,0.00014552503,0.00010458722,0.00013987969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046417603,0.0028375532,0.009763629,0.003417876,0.0012627628,0.000046435583,0.0009978173,0.0024578525,0.00016831867,0.2305667,0.10882443,0.63919246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025465263,0.000043258533,0.0047457227,0.0005578798,0.0014680311,0.0000061276173,0.0013815748,0.014083254,0.00015954034,0.004643404,0.9697641,0.00060055923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000022797951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016405313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080532904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003482744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7486975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091559507","doi":"10.1108/13673271311300840","title":"The intellectual core and impact of the knowledge management academic discipline","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Originality; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Body of knowledge; Citation; Computer science; Library science; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.039770719152386044,"score_gpt":0.35494247639805715,"score_spread":0.3151717572456711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091559507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29753533,0.011689401,0.00032134485,0.001302502,0.0020440756,0.0016754664,0.0000018859271,0.000036635844,0.68539333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9542663,0.006084,0.00012302096,0.000019516394,0.00046543955,0.000027026696,4.3199995e-7,0.000022944581,0.038991302],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754155,0.00028576198,0.0008627812,0.00023066645,0.00053997134,0.0005392699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979958,0.00046313516,0.00056965847,0.0003942488,0.00038402554,0.00019315016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024798969,0.00025680225,0.0003553033,0.00031956,0.000997091,0.00019360286,0.001559385,0.000090351095,0.00018008234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021704801,0.00013823762,0.00038317044,0.0009160993,0.0006153827,0.00034188657,0.0014562261,0.00048185315,0.0001204681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000129849,0.0005510203,0.019949965,0.00044265788,0.002360244,0.000013873098,0.053529713,0.000041271935,0.000067871486,0.19592026,0.15791957,0.5690737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031733993,0.000549832,0.23516762,0.0013911593,0.0012749417,0.000013910462,0.08964154,0.0018335987,0.00006420065,0.024398956,0.64162976,0.00086107344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002892089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022686255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65673095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033237445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008108954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76689184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098532060","doi":"10.1108/13673271311315150","title":"Building knowledge: developing a knowledge‐based dynamic capabilities typology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Dynamic capabilities; Originality; Extant taxon; Fragmentation (computing); Resource (disambiguation); Data science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019532258594272066,"score_gpt":0.2743946296124274,"score_spread":0.25486237101815534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098532060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026223458,0.0024329475,0.01632943,0.002370366,0.0058571245,0.0013178275,0.0000012023874,0.0002679832,0.94519967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767461,0.000048080827,0.011997617,0.0011614946,0.001743798,0.00012948674,0.000009973001,0.00011211752,0.008051349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963028,0.00009957813,0.0017190885,0.0005534817,0.0004282679,0.00089681474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99570346,0.00017212669,0.0010846861,0.00057841087,0.0023910275,0.000070275586],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017622178,0.0006292369,0.0008225273,0.002881242,0.00044130982,0.0005846445,0.0012114309,0.00017589315,0.0006557002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020664796,0.00056559534,0.00039643052,0.0022078457,0.00022862527,0.0013202314,0.0008968203,0.000498038,0.00379465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060270067,0.0009202495,0.00084780366,0.002420499,0.00041964435,0.000039954797,0.0004110585,0.000039039285,0.000219695,0.8753537,0.03872316,0.08054494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004056513,0.00012749001,0.0065411567,0.0010713547,0.0004867231,0.00002470682,0.0063527115,0.015699964,0.00017825713,0.03878473,0.9252994,0.0013769775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000017681303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012031998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9505226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006844954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018327296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99967957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099755860","doi":"10.1108/13673270510629954","title":"Powerful public sector knowledge management: a school district example","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Originality; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Literacy; Data collection; Sociology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.04765527884549008,"score_gpt":0.30697230164395783,"score_spread":0.25931702279846774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099755860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007882123,0.0055479114,0.0025678566,0.0012062961,0.0021575356,0.0008169984,0.0000029240266,0.00016631826,0.97965205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.860894,0.0021715378,0.0027769196,0.00013978255,0.0030738674,0.000030781608,0.0000059269405,0.000067383306,0.13083977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956237,0.0004573934,0.0012437679,0.00054843514,0.0009737769,0.0011529283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972224,0.00015663507,0.00065042666,0.0006148471,0.00058333983,0.00077234546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035698777,0.0004567814,0.0006143643,0.0015560598,0.0008169678,0.0006848363,0.0019348185,0.00015025018,0.0021719346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016050489,0.0004377478,0.0005081429,0.0019404691,0.0002257582,0.0013312425,0.0008928818,0.00050755416,0.0030927407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008293772,0.0020067184,0.0040885536,0.00046373357,0.0014701997,0.00019914597,0.009332765,0.000014967587,0.000012786381,0.3980195,0.20329559,0.3810131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017503438,0.00010322211,0.004211546,0.00021322342,0.00034659894,0.00000604201,0.008486578,0.000095992655,0.000018492814,0.00093411317,0.983344,0.0004898538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023656532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093338225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8530119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012156104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019129619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102372409","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2015-0086","title":"Citation classics published in <i>Knowledge Management</i> journals. Part II: studying research trends and discovering the Google Scholar Effect","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publish or perish; Originality; Citation impact; Reputation; Publication; Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Publishing; Business; Advertising; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.1557059683560485,"score_gpt":0.41521348292678306,"score_spread":0.25950751457073457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102372409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17040801,0.009897079,0.00013841903,0.002331752,0.0024011235,0.0008333,0.0000010212773,0.000044336168,0.81394494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9688357,0.0021161698,0.00033033095,0.00003733674,0.0011658802,0.000058821348,0.0000021424776,0.00004064095,0.027412938],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938721,0.0021725888,0.001060958,0.00044671894,0.0015459277,0.00090169715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976016,0.00043711643,0.00046586755,0.00041934333,0.00068421423,0.0003918593],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03588662,0.00030753724,0.0005199391,0.0025281222,0.0017540448,0.0016434274,0.0013157342,0.000114603215,0.000065822904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076561264,0.0002304738,0.00018657453,0.0039774035,0.00031950182,0.002152082,0.0015561194,0.0012770884,0.000049677063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033355167,0.0011308464,0.032411963,0.00048198042,0.00088658155,0.00029605115,0.092203476,0.00011133341,0.000011231274,0.08122329,0.09796824,0.6929414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004231929,0.0005557586,0.018785318,0.0010735082,0.00032035777,0.0000068392665,0.07510934,0.0003860703,0.000018108985,0.004353841,0.894728,0.00043095445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000026389594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010236348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7984277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008770822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010910402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106903238","doi":"10.1108/13673270310493001","title":"Braintrust International 2003 Conference, San Francisco, CA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"RealNetworks (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Maturity (psychological); Workflow; Knowledge management; GRASP; Knowledge creation; Business; International business; Computer science; Management; Political science; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.019719533118145376,"score_gpt":0.24743075902223202,"score_spread":0.22771122590408666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106903238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015511123,0.00023464001,0.0049318206,0.00056998665,0.0067301337,0.00031710317,0.0000013361341,0.00004604087,0.9856178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96530235,0.00005892704,0.002332778,0.002112987,0.00201807,0.000016938691,0.00001438912,0.000045458743,0.0280981],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977981,0.00003612276,0.0009449208,0.0002745192,0.00055872276,0.00038763357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690634,0.00001892358,0.0007477415,0.00030033523,0.0019893139,0.00003732695],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014032073,0.00029803516,0.00036436113,0.0012999945,0.00018416187,0.0004543187,0.0007013277,0.00007157276,0.0041006682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023553093,0.00026653163,0.00014065483,0.0014758295,0.00007415644,0.0008495059,0.00025727105,0.00028195378,0.0018875567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003614325,0.00035383756,0.0011109321,0.00015364202,0.00025020872,0.00007288801,0.00007552736,0.00001010692,0.000030297042,0.80164194,0.18183611,0.014428343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017502479,0.000028080005,0.0011436428,0.000119653996,0.00012458766,0.000013118823,0.001711734,0.00069149706,0.0000414765,0.0068067214,0.9872592,0.0003100449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000030520846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003131644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96375126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001506696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057171404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108300398","doi":"10.1108/13673270310463581","title":"The e‐flow audit: an evaluation of knowledge flow within and outside a high‐tech firm","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Audit; Business; Knowledge flow; Survey data collection; Perception; Snapshot (computer storage); Flow chart; Proxy (statistics); Computer science; Psychology; Accounting; Statistics","score_opus":0.028551720095253152,"score_gpt":0.2645864809216869,"score_spread":0.23603476082643376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108300398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72638017,0.007548383,0.0012654986,0.00044857434,0.0025819913,0.00068377255,0.0000023263085,0.000036336194,0.26105294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967099,0.00026328003,0.0006686597,0.00009412875,0.0006803108,0.000013685298,0.000004168206,0.000021619288,0.0015442703],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809134,0.00010347574,0.00076454016,0.00019799208,0.0005864357,0.00025622163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759626,0.00008437363,0.000679842,0.00029564285,0.0013122964,0.00003160754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046690097,0.00021916455,0.0003470588,0.0005110477,0.0003482092,0.00021062944,0.0003655141,0.00005972315,0.00028261394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028452594,0.00014524454,0.00016588766,0.00069800974,0.00010266008,0.0008465159,0.00014643717,0.00021076294,0.00012882889],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006438462,0.0020321768,0.006846455,0.0017427101,0.002370604,0.000034960744,0.0064247875,0.01029765,0.00028210838,0.08000486,0.06278886,0.826531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005907908,0.00061136385,0.0236157,0.0007753982,0.0051831966,0.000041734056,0.009660749,0.54241866,0.0013154757,0.04222835,0.36712128,0.0011201976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000021218704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047305768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8254108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009607872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006422374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59229004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110967597","doi":"10.1108/13673270910931125","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Reputation; Journal ranking; Promotion (chess); Knowledge management; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Originality; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Social science; Qualitative research; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.021709539118081357,"score_gpt":0.27279261506465996,"score_spread":0.2510830759465786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110967597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57877904,0.024583047,0.00253198,0.0004302513,0.0011473169,0.00042826793,0.0000028212228,0.000049738475,0.39204755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99230725,0.0038653112,0.00038172427,0.00039539146,0.0013841926,0.00000344959,0.0000033290737,0.00002116679,0.001638164],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997146,0.000038919054,0.001390113,0.00031438004,0.00059830165,0.00051229674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980338,0.00007504893,0.00094847,0.00025134993,0.00062432926,0.000066971326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014610644,0.00039930263,0.00074346736,0.0014536526,0.00022710458,0.0002061668,0.00075195887,0.00012684007,0.00037188956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100455014,0.0003297399,0.000414742,0.0016251879,0.00012137247,0.0012469747,0.00046522345,0.00042449613,0.00022842432],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001302259,0.0016605612,0.01489978,0.0026781978,0.002863509,0.00031489713,0.005048056,0.00035782668,0.00024749676,0.13723755,0.10740416,0.7259857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015242961,0.0020490913,0.20939313,0.0073983422,0.009387316,0.00062769366,0.032892264,0.014225439,0.0007735818,0.08798736,0.61602265,0.004000164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000058321857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014691285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7219855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015981865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000263049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119174046","doi":"10.1108/13673271211238797","title":"Books as a knowledge translation mechanism: citation analysis and author survey","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Originality; Knowledge management; Intellectual capital; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.0648433909018335,"score_gpt":0.28987445582579924,"score_spread":0.22503106492396574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119174046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77815473,0.0042150295,0.021725668,0.0002563725,0.0011935879,0.00034116302,0.0000030795802,0.00004989345,0.1940605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953735,0.00014177064,0.00038066445,0.00015194726,0.00085714814,0.0000063084826,0.000022592658,0.000018567644,0.0030475378],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985737,0.000060277147,0.0005949141,0.00016123532,0.00030299058,0.00030688234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987594,0.000109496796,0.00044638469,0.00014515608,0.0004915431,0.00004803086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024670926,0.00020848583,0.00040043835,0.0020734183,0.0001906674,0.00021347677,0.0001972056,0.000066779656,0.00038884353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008907247,0.00017280756,0.00028145348,0.001974217,0.000033201286,0.0014520439,0.00010279526,0.00015930909,0.00043110913],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014040973,0.0029162646,0.20700666,0.0025407255,0.015809484,0.00004259431,0.01928627,0.00022094039,0.0007443557,0.23686022,0.028466262,0.48470214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035492352,0.00036276516,0.680453,0.00030149892,0.020717306,0.000030596493,0.00764797,0.042888626,0.00068836985,0.015234436,0.22634602,0.0017801764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005934149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028878544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48292196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005589505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013534782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7046888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140055463","doi":"10.1108/13673270810859569","title":"Qualified ageing workers in the knowledge management process of high‐tech businesses","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Originality; Thematic analysis; Judgement; Personal knowledge management; Process (computing); Human resource management; Knowledge value chain; Business; Organizational learning; Computer science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.031552204988100956,"score_gpt":0.275197697766263,"score_spread":0.24364549277816205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140055463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13358893,0.0010642435,0.0012610639,0.0009884001,0.0017852572,0.0011603094,0.0000011535776,0.00007415043,0.8600765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941204,0.00024343524,0.00058963394,0.0005476248,0.0010227349,0.0000711626,0.000010188106,0.000060200782,0.003334613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960922,0.000104559695,0.0018687635,0.00042928557,0.0009021131,0.0006030627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966899,0.00010954063,0.0014119109,0.0006428802,0.0011159801,0.000029758601],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027901868,0.0004934629,0.0007576777,0.0026292515,0.0003394627,0.0001800478,0.0016771985,0.0001058228,0.00009868506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008918233,0.00037255016,0.0002743489,0.004774659,0.00020211104,0.0009179453,0.00059330923,0.00043486917,0.000255294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062481884,0.00541951,0.0155844195,0.009129933,0.0010741063,0.0018499215,0.004857104,0.00039479852,0.00004152266,0.8513553,0.056610197,0.053058345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015425059,0.0002665922,0.2049335,0.0044927355,0.0015845011,0.00014353228,0.11361306,0.00091192406,0.0002819309,0.021400899,0.6345393,0.0024069806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000034617202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014011176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86053145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016105785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000607526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147698887","doi":"10.1108/13673271011059545","title":"Beyond the ba: managing enabling contexts in knowledge organizations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Originality; Computer science; Personal knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Knowledge value chain; Process (computing); Value (mathematics); Organizational learning; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.013397005402547209,"score_gpt":0.2995906099375076,"score_spread":0.28619360453496034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147698887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03269956,0.0022794174,0.0011438361,0.0026571874,0.0043219794,0.0005541616,6.2678544e-7,0.00005281331,0.9562904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97423273,0.0006323873,0.0004778018,0.00011455621,0.0012632286,0.000012134764,0.0000011522862,0.00003076906,0.02323522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788636,0.00026109797,0.0007135775,0.00023451199,0.00039522065,0.0005092399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983735,0.0002622374,0.00033193218,0.0003245705,0.00055107614,0.00015668973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003929269,0.00019909836,0.00030209875,0.00077146717,0.00078596204,0.0003112501,0.001183986,0.00008958579,0.0003719607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003758601,0.00015664191,0.00013667806,0.0019216138,0.0002212396,0.0004858376,0.00043715312,0.00066035625,0.0002237871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024437713,0.00060166325,0.011503495,0.00013029591,0.00026248564,0.000101429425,0.050829083,0.000043817556,0.00015139006,0.7569569,0.01769513,0.16169992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014389149,0.00004689282,0.009981971,0.00019686602,0.00021311277,0.0000067080596,0.02556824,0.00039571617,0.000072540126,0.015378732,0.94632345,0.00037684536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029477445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006842173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9415332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001952301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014582579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6387672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148125661","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2013-0166","title":"Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientometrics; Originality; Publication; Knowledge management; Productivity; Empirical research; Data science; Regional science; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.15105807998823234,"score_gpt":0.3595108145514688,"score_spread":0.20845273456323649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148125661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6787214,0.0095563,0.001558777,0.0008303658,0.00085665355,0.001155634,0.000012187942,0.000013720781,0.3072949],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930091,0.00031519326,0.00009246558,0.000039077924,0.00020349372,0.000019226049,0.0000030757533,0.00001861731,0.0062997746],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961574,0.00012979125,0.0014966453,0.00026787928,0.0015453123,0.00040293956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99543273,0.00022667521,0.0014961266,0.0008152985,0.0020010942,0.000028086326],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005294027,0.00024787424,0.0011144014,0.0058289077,0.00034989777,0.00022926467,0.0022293983,0.000048267084,0.0012597813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001454184,0.00012612899,0.0021023646,0.020192282,0.0004363146,0.0015492593,0.0023467923,0.00032446499,0.00012320023],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003702424,0.006048671,0.035304084,0.01091309,0.5303686,0.000020090822,0.0083542345,0.010723292,0.0013620765,0.31928745,0.03969015,0.037557974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002292891,0.00030644174,0.34579566,0.0005252339,0.51969767,0.000004562682,0.026097436,0.04021508,0.0024230075,0.015401852,0.046195626,0.0010445311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001739661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002675069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31428763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008298743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021799973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150457675","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2014-0252","title":"What matters for knowledge sharing in collectivistic cultures? Empirical evidence from China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Collectivism; Knowledge sharing; Context (archaeology); Knowledge value chain; Business; Empirical research; Incentive; Empirical evidence; Personal knowledge management; Psychology; Marketing; Organizational learning; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.07996289898124358,"score_gpt":0.38116562141612537,"score_spread":0.3012027224348818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150457675","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37282762,0.023240587,0.0841851,0.017903667,0.022684488,0.0049574696,0.0000061701003,0.0002753814,0.4739195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97395545,0.0014767746,0.0022976245,0.00018223801,0.0016748189,0.00006402882,0.0000024233793,0.000039493138,0.020307176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974338,0.00034119995,0.00079198915,0.0004384109,0.00042151715,0.0005731087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980746,0.0007697472,0.00038888725,0.00029526482,0.0002557244,0.00021578358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036793477,0.0002601479,0.0005254669,0.00062662526,0.00043876976,0.0006553232,0.0011498367,0.000106105006,0.00011153443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007199081,0.00023754843,0.00027367703,0.00082087505,0.00012187988,0.001177198,0.00041961134,0.0002992185,0.00009513114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00094664725,0.002812769,0.09207521,0.0018566807,0.0013791432,0.00015851598,0.30280992,0.00054439943,0.00020694686,0.05526877,0.3078802,0.23406078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004437562,0.0004876849,0.08450976,0.0066778483,0.0006620832,0.0000034216569,0.02562552,0.009168899,0.0001051382,0.024171662,0.8430766,0.0010738635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005133414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023715617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6011278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006589391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007854624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9686944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154262006","doi":"10.1108/13673271211238733","title":"Managing organizational memory with intergenerational knowledge transfer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Tacit knowledge; Generalizability theory; Knowledge value chain; Context (archaeology); Explicit knowledge; Originality; Organizational learning; Empirical research; Computer science; Psychology; Creativity; Social psychology","score_opus":0.022891543836346413,"score_gpt":0.2835126527729726,"score_spread":0.2606211089366262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154262006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018700669,0.003211476,0.030664587,0.0007865711,0.0023947125,0.0003447142,0.0000011072301,0.00006092653,0.94383526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96465623,0.00038641752,0.0017522486,0.000074870404,0.0025439647,0.0000103775055,0.0000045218553,0.00003523643,0.03053611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804026,0.00021811988,0.0005194127,0.00017148048,0.00054651994,0.00050423644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884963,0.00007711827,0.0001402231,0.00015685578,0.00049831765,0.00027785826],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019253535,0.00020509846,0.0002666544,0.0005516339,0.00050531165,0.0001317675,0.0005102859,0.000060238697,0.0009908634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037928698,0.00017352957,0.00013112507,0.0007808661,0.00013869141,0.00082615716,0.00014079206,0.00020792667,0.00026063077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014977329,0.0017086709,0.021214118,0.00032101877,0.0013323978,0.000048647024,0.06178183,0.00015460192,0.00008230862,0.80424917,0.036469888,0.07248761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024878539,0.00018131657,0.008266427,0.00040559584,0.0006789533,0.000023987574,0.023012014,0.00028029358,0.00039464602,0.0018092156,0.9617273,0.00073236896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000039224456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019711976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003165641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012036351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155973496","doi":"10.1108/13673270710752090","title":"The moderating role of human capital management practices on employee capabilities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Structural equation modeling; Human resource management; Job satisfaction; Knowledge management; Psychology; Human capital; Originality; Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.02050094257113728,"score_gpt":0.272772721523782,"score_spread":0.25227177895264474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155973496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6468455,0.00084011885,0.00011320264,0.00013374258,0.0003560207,0.0001904482,3.791646e-7,0.000016840537,0.35150373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995102,0.00014626527,0.0001604291,0.000166937,0.0010745286,0.0000067714177,0.0000022746644,0.000023918215,0.0033168762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978275,0.00002364257,0.0009660397,0.00019139521,0.00060753356,0.0003839237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748373,0.00018335474,0.0015148037,0.00030621426,0.00048795078,0.000023919414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00239915,0.00023347682,0.00032265944,0.0006684448,0.0005488165,0.00027757126,0.00059818215,0.00004481173,0.0001133165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009629676,0.00015529957,0.00029031755,0.0004902858,0.0001120278,0.0008104097,0.0002858004,0.00025562168,0.00013614302],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010285919,0.0013884326,0.016230073,0.0019815145,0.0026666857,0.00014282824,0.0056314045,0.000892931,0.0008880347,0.80482835,0.013019139,0.15130201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005224012,0.0019230564,0.07974127,0.0018840935,0.0039117723,0.000043052434,0.27808508,0.00593801,0.006531402,0.13455948,0.47991243,0.0022463528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000049650804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027391288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6702689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009294897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000098347455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6332933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160168127","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2013-0494","title":"Knowledge-centered culture and knowledge sharing: the moderator role of trust propensity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Originality; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Association (psychology); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.03604670583397745,"score_gpt":0.2923635970994431,"score_spread":0.25631689126546564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160168127","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11588322,0.008437585,0.0005749033,0.00032003483,0.0011172456,0.0008351221,0.000001794856,0.000049610633,0.8727805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674839,0.0008163631,0.00032589005,0.000033633954,0.00090193923,0.00001560999,0.0000011374186,0.000029803621,0.030391738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739367,0.00046707218,0.0008388744,0.00036840158,0.00042923825,0.0005027326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978781,0.00012389223,0.0005880289,0.000437482,0.0007183934,0.00025412085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037033516,0.00030351753,0.00059705466,0.00035554534,0.0007792129,0.00026804872,0.00125962,0.00012609718,0.00007478273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021723774,0.0002131641,0.0002624277,0.0006279941,0.00037944727,0.00041438226,0.0009949307,0.00038582415,0.00007134782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002776358,0.002131374,0.024939984,0.0010438542,0.0012348258,0.000015976158,0.1492934,0.000029646328,0.00037008492,0.5710038,0.026888173,0.22277124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017724469,0.00024875547,0.006993921,0.0004644211,0.00046007815,0.0000054391253,0.017939929,0.0031346902,0.00026791953,0.0061467406,0.9621792,0.0003865017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019815094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005980801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.935291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018292648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010209792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8692579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160904960","doi":"10.1108/13673270810852458","title":"The effect of tacit knowledge on firm performance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Balanced scorecard; Knowledge management; Originality; Business; Sample (material); Value (mathematics); Metric (unit); Index (typography); Explicit knowledge; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Marketing; Psychology; Creativity; Data mining","score_opus":0.013958084442923253,"score_gpt":0.226933813213748,"score_spread":0.21297572877082474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160904960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71380997,0.0015409302,0.00003280826,0.00010106683,0.00080202555,0.00016330149,3.047228e-7,0.000014414618,0.28353518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989415,0.00093326904,0.000014833534,0.00008185891,0.0011499202,0.00000888247,0.0000015149319,0.000020067515,0.008374669],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984734,0.00003162768,0.0006550572,0.00014788842,0.00039138054,0.00030062627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985724,0.00018992077,0.00056537066,0.0002810415,0.00037003364,0.00002123286],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011138681,0.0002356403,0.0004080311,0.00054977357,0.0004807445,0.0000699835,0.0006209879,0.00004692872,0.0001417159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082954095,0.0001344638,0.00036491491,0.0008046922,0.00013579159,0.00053763477,0.00021058338,0.00025568221,0.0009828602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0043939278,0.0013364892,0.07956347,0.0048253983,0.0025974333,0.00019158804,0.002184877,0.0014280165,0.00021185323,0.016579947,0.39385685,0.49283016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023572159,0.0015402044,0.033150535,0.0005623309,0.0006406669,0.000039331702,0.00035340618,0.008367812,0.002395387,0.0001769979,0.94995624,0.00045988135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000040569257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009683376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55609936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064005064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001702058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168631559","doi":"10.1108/13673270610709198","title":"Where is the knowledge we have lost in managers?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Sample (material); Knowledge management; Psychology; Population; Anxiety; Value (mathematics); USable; Tacit knowledge; Computer science; Social psychology; Creativity; Sociology","score_opus":0.13915624865939197,"score_gpt":0.4022741468965934,"score_spread":0.26311789823720144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168631559","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049086113,0.009138488,0.0020615046,0.012776319,0.0015784248,0.0006914903,0.000007685773,0.000023813534,0.9246362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.807364,0.00073862175,0.00059629825,0.0003922626,0.00046981053,0.00001238997,0.0000013634835,0.00002188296,0.19040336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622816,0.00021631099,0.0016524749,0.00026887006,0.0012506279,0.0003835327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781275,0.00033144746,0.00078561023,0.0005714408,0.00040416818,0.000094579504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042339433,0.0002500913,0.00040677236,0.0013122943,0.00017470901,0.00052019476,0.0017940602,0.00006660824,0.0012395168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051707913,0.00015193496,0.0003566769,0.0011579227,0.00010847013,0.00088795397,0.0004947578,0.00032500856,0.0031007852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006355553,0.0005098928,0.016618129,0.000082564715,0.00007633424,0.00012490388,0.003444376,0.00017539968,0.000007673575,0.020864017,0.8447145,0.11331862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010718657,0.000060188762,0.07612254,0.00015265874,0.00008123668,0.0000120667155,0.009349318,0.0012682419,0.000025024212,0.0064350124,0.90522087,0.00020097164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010025125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004709818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7582779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019588403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000387412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171108411","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2014-0256","title":"Interorganisational partnerships and knowledge sharing: the perspective of non-profit organisations (NPOs)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; General partnership; Knowledge management; Business; Social media; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Originality; Sociology; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.053347563981951895,"score_gpt":0.3344772969259764,"score_spread":0.2811297329440245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171108411","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0837265,0.0010463278,0.005576493,0.004318521,0.0011128339,0.00056908384,0.0000013304606,0.00003463184,0.9036143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98770607,0.00016466311,0.00050576945,0.000043832297,0.00066854537,0.000007972346,7.609728e-7,0.000018728002,0.010883689],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99830544,0.0002476067,0.00055808324,0.00023000517,0.0003806247,0.00027821286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824876,0.00026943252,0.0004273178,0.00025019085,0.00067175605,0.00013252128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003195358,0.00016712157,0.00029209972,0.00035515038,0.00054728764,0.0001433809,0.00077352434,0.0000611611,0.0001924417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032556723,0.00012822557,0.00013740825,0.0005262839,0.00035290662,0.00028827888,0.0004882624,0.00023749171,0.00006375748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002563654,0.00013207072,0.0099136755,0.00010308373,0.00033535418,0.0000023678888,0.05981787,0.000005172874,0.000060047143,0.9170168,0.004877728,0.0077101635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033870926,0.0005696826,0.07131487,0.00069634756,0.0012178996,0.000011702626,0.26994672,0.003203024,0.0005437457,0.091483586,0.5568167,0.0008086275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000209135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005131001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90397954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036292727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013123847,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5228887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230110439","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2014-0512","title":"Knowledge needs in the non-profit sector: an evidence-based model of organizational practices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Originality; Qualitative property; Knowledge value chain; Situated; Descriptive statistics; Business; Qualitative research; Organizational learning; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11895381651045671,"score_gpt":0.3723404964456276,"score_spread":0.2533866799351709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230110439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8549511,0.002030753,0.02376069,0.0045328503,0.0013128036,0.000866958,0.000005309719,0.000032150663,0.11250737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968304,0.0002738206,0.00083183986,0.00006752459,0.0004769875,0.000007923804,2.9463249e-7,0.000014334521,0.0014969003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818724,0.00039969909,0.0005033768,0.00013112318,0.0005327624,0.00024579777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796253,0.0005201053,0.00069444184,0.00021191934,0.00051866955,0.000092322836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036886842,0.00012331706,0.00021547076,0.00044815117,0.00016065288,0.000061680235,0.00081324345,0.00006163899,0.00012341714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005173844,0.00007339481,0.000093957824,0.00087353995,0.000127722,0.00088752224,0.00007099119,0.00014216108,0.000022082717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077629904,0.003021186,0.5115534,0.0011738164,0.00048496155,0.000063377964,0.18310922,0.002043768,0.023932867,0.21538393,0.0149215795,0.04353557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021629585,0.004902306,0.48256025,0.01840303,0.0021437444,0.000040348274,0.2051683,0.05983359,0.020174991,0.024978973,0.15620054,0.00396433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006616951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010800343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19040497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002509909,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043240297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29929537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492209886","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2015-0394","title":"Negotiate, reciprocate, or cooperate? The impact of exchange modes on inter-employee knowledge sharing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Social exchange theory; Negotiation; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Reciprocal; Affect (linguistics); Knowledge value chain; Business; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Originality; Organizational learning; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0782807598293501,"score_gpt":0.3719554055005187,"score_spread":0.29367464567116863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492209886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21416454,0.0017622854,0.0015011869,0.00061261584,0.00143683,0.00089603185,0.0000056861068,0.000075303506,0.77954555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92651576,0.0016449183,0.0000817033,0.000024065534,0.0007771781,0.000024055718,5.354216e-7,0.000040375628,0.07089142],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99733317,0.000357302,0.0009067067,0.00034115283,0.00044609635,0.0006155743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976901,0.0003769473,0.0005713988,0.00049524714,0.0006533915,0.00021292316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030711156,0.0003314155,0.00053754,0.00064513384,0.0004430292,0.00017104854,0.0016711681,0.000098827404,0.00078873034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031154914,0.00015922746,0.0004483447,0.00094223866,0.00028878544,0.0005458164,0.00068910484,0.0002480231,0.0002830943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028310923,0.002953332,0.031474397,0.0008607614,0.0039929203,0.00018618915,0.06228209,0.00019090323,0.00065798906,0.08493006,0.1613135,0.64832675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.025162634,0.008601927,0.067178644,0.014815959,0.0020513139,0.000041212897,0.044981647,0.0016380444,0.0034034261,0.0130602885,0.8154848,0.003580104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007030277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080004893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7123512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006484952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016475415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8636044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507132064","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2016-0203","title":"Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":515,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge value chain; Organizational learning; Knowledge worker; Body of knowledge; Personal knowledge management; Knowledge economy; Business; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0857896919783409,"score_gpt":0.3291235540236057,"score_spread":0.2433338620452648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507132064","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20752066,0.0104426015,0.021406667,0.001510004,0.005997487,0.0014530573,0.000020209893,0.0001278,0.7515215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99047124,0.0021144564,0.00043099181,0.000009327607,0.00057142694,0.000010221075,9.562759e-7,0.000029933573,0.0063614426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974809,0.00033847845,0.0008784763,0.00036108014,0.0004906429,0.00045037144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978643,0.00032224646,0.0006478193,0.00020690898,0.0007449483,0.00021377079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024336583,0.00026536803,0.0004899469,0.0008236697,0.0005062022,0.00012382386,0.0006343219,0.000104589715,0.00021525542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030619316,0.00020695881,0.00014576637,0.00079943106,0.000984382,0.000695259,0.0004083474,0.00016479567,0.00004933159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016905229,0.0014351076,0.08631186,0.0005984527,0.0010937426,0.00008408982,0.04404278,0.0000017196103,0.005168534,0.8064379,0.009462528,0.045194227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02249976,0.0025918763,0.07916254,0.017400041,0.006189044,0.0002305615,0.2732936,0.0002264507,0.021197144,0.13818957,0.4336754,0.0053439843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00000820603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022269695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7829506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008769863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023692937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84395355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525271897","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2015-0385","title":"Knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive organizations: the crucial role of improvisation in transferring and protecting knowledge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge value chain; Procedural knowledge; Organizational learning; Personal knowledge management; Originality; Computer science; Storytelling; Knowledge integration; Context (archaeology); Body of knowledge; Knowledge engineering; Psychology; Social psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.011910540853614236,"score_gpt":0.22540265422077763,"score_spread":0.2134921133671634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525271897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7899641,0.021402111,0.01770726,0.003935288,0.00224927,0.004381221,0.0000062759723,0.0001339992,0.1602205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99785,0.0005203674,0.00009987888,0.00006525629,0.00072701776,0.00003815631,0.0000017154346,0.00005039692,0.000647189],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99774545,0.00010521081,0.0011693606,0.0003338042,0.0002464974,0.00039968692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979302,0.00023307599,0.0003047205,0.0001963834,0.0013081628,0.000027456024],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017637714,0.00032402048,0.00052748114,0.001298786,0.0002454826,0.00010747805,0.00046923713,0.00008710778,0.00008507873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005114788,0.00021402599,0.00011236246,0.002142533,0.000142399,0.00090506393,0.00036298024,0.00026293757,0.000054218977],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006684235,0.0029796986,0.16301563,0.0048097246,0.0009317593,0.00004996659,0.036958646,0.00013415886,0.008783118,0.27147144,0.0030483373,0.5071491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024885517,0.0005013429,0.6339299,0.00964577,0.0015830637,0.00003572266,0.07246568,0.007951898,0.006159803,0.03464431,0.20553225,0.0026647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000041304982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021730284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50448436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020672182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006721699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8727727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593464539","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2016-0173","title":"Means-ends based know-how mapping","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Computer science; Originality; Need to know; Modularity (biology); Resource (disambiguation); Linkage (software); Value (mathematics); Usability; Data science; Human–computer interaction; Qualitative research; Sociology","score_opus":0.051375170004750365,"score_gpt":0.3569490393028268,"score_spread":0.3055738692980764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593464539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030060988,0.00015342231,0.031060863,0.005042417,0.0026140094,0.0002527614,0.0000021189414,0.000018292343,0.95785004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840288,0.00010293894,0.0018815083,0.000093902214,0.00071975705,0.0000048796514,0.0000010633713,0.0000064099236,0.013160733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885607,0.00012215652,0.00037095748,0.000061085535,0.00039155368,0.00019817172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846303,0.000035511344,0.0008415445,0.00020706581,0.00036287194,0.00008998947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025247007,0.00007582837,0.00015003681,0.00019996506,0.0012479643,0.000517058,0.0005052556,0.000032091404,0.00018487539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011902453,0.00006639237,0.00011199051,0.00009035462,0.00009078898,0.00088816363,0.000068902635,0.00007647058,0.000057135705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040339557,0.000104343366,0.0030722246,0.00022050638,0.00020756689,0.000022758884,0.03727125,0.000018246361,0.000025290954,0.48957416,0.07538583,0.39405748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065405446,0.00003574394,0.0030735142,0.00011175556,0.00002473679,9.597874e-7,0.032401465,0.00012983353,0.000034252513,0.0005996706,0.9628515,0.00008249469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020365718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010820392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018167948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007928105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95984584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594035967","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2016-0300","title":"Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part III: author survey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Citation; Originality; Luck; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Perspective (graphical); Citation analysis; Sociology; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Social science; Library science; Qualitative research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0713316986651997,"score_gpt":0.3090176294564667,"score_spread":0.237685930791267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594035967","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14710508,0.0021295662,0.0010814517,0.0015085997,0.005367512,0.0006043331,0.0000039087013,0.000048998263,0.84215057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97826725,0.0007550575,0.00021200234,0.000256091,0.002163239,0.000021352927,0.00002201765,0.00004583017,0.01825717],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996639,0.00008782486,0.0015525392,0.00040107244,0.0007046052,0.00061492465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99599975,0.00008715994,0.0019172449,0.00072519627,0.0012005584,0.00007011299],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005895462,0.00040692114,0.00072842167,0.002443911,0.00070624135,0.0023199688,0.0016183617,0.0001292368,0.00094972365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003489,0.00034051944,0.00040144112,0.0011805271,0.000120297125,0.0041111764,0.0008672905,0.00056264625,0.00082768133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012332578,0.0026036033,0.10605644,0.002063421,0.0020264622,0.0005695819,0.001818738,0.00031826922,0.000022191647,0.056874447,0.53722036,0.28919324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038613963,0.00010846278,0.46284276,0.001058472,0.00066979125,0.000011394883,0.0022874877,0.0060937875,0.000024188237,0.0057995636,0.5164527,0.00078996405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007179958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013424488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83116215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025312242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043701424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597920650","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2016-0113","title":"Knowledge management, problem solving and performance in top Italian firms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Knowledge management; Originality; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Empirical research; Computer science; Test (biology); Value (mathematics); Empirical evidence; Organizational learning; Creativity; Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology","score_opus":0.020682495724878083,"score_gpt":0.2508747555013092,"score_spread":0.23019225977643115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597920650","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36094093,0.0011326371,0.00006812599,0.0002684862,0.0005349059,0.00025802988,4.1044476e-7,0.000020353393,0.6367761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98685986,0.001235118,0.00047017727,0.00013897852,0.00088843086,0.000013464468,0.000002531317,0.00003046186,0.010360952],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981674,0.000014340194,0.00074469805,0.00030961458,0.00028954487,0.00047440123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985174,0.000021824835,0.00072606985,0.00044305754,0.00025207587,0.000039564893],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011432811,0.00030846265,0.0004596622,0.0011605336,0.00058622414,0.000791837,0.0008951893,0.00007068108,0.00015961628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003251973,0.0002570236,0.00017965966,0.00042062788,0.00011708341,0.0025525927,0.0009567015,0.00029035556,0.0004331143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005017993,0.0012139475,0.33033508,0.008135206,0.0010667358,0.000444585,0.002837808,0.00010930749,0.00003899719,0.05652166,0.024542116,0.5742528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041571883,0.0002461054,0.47890773,0.0025159644,0.00082997174,0.000040198633,0.005158484,0.0119674485,0.00007895007,0.00397229,0.49094474,0.0011809381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019938294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014905036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62641513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000098484496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000013696471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600698132","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2016-0183","title":"A two-sided matching decision method for supply and demand of technological knowledge","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Knowledge management; Supply and demand; Value (mathematics); Optimal matching; Originality; Tacit knowledge; Machine learning; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.018405777663389945,"score_gpt":0.30908724940019877,"score_spread":0.2906814717368088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600698132","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7451375,0.001936388,0.21902174,0.0016474809,0.0008480901,0.001511168,0.0000037843356,0.00005316918,0.02984065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93871844,0.00009015804,0.060438614,0.00006000846,0.00033725853,0.000023406457,0.0000014224996,0.000029010747,0.00030168451],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838555,0.000027184482,0.0007477424,0.00028541996,0.0002554726,0.00029865632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997798,0.0002969292,0.001082823,0.0004955153,0.0002977572,0.000028930006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026152532,0.00024250548,0.00053180597,0.0004899653,0.00042475972,0.00029088845,0.0008125047,0.000094132105,0.00003577807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006544032,0.00019440983,0.00019522825,0.0001646078,0.00025163128,0.0009667122,0.0013533015,0.00017996227,0.000014280631],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000726,0.001433204,0.04433686,0.0033794658,0.00036891343,0.000085865664,0.00026777195,0.00025797373,0.001647812,0.16960832,0.0027224724,0.7751653],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013626141,0.00027330234,0.4606713,0.0025710065,0.0015120397,0.00008506872,0.0044237208,0.006036271,0.001480268,0.29388276,0.21429032,0.0011477952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001788799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000038675993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7740176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011747399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000142573435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79278034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621565102","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2016-0229","title":"Non-profit organizations’ use of tools and technologies for knowledge management: a comparative study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Knowledge management; Qualitative property; Popularity; Descriptive statistics; Data collection; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Business; Qualitative research; Computer science; Marketing; Sociology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.12929265884608568,"score_gpt":0.38144922107104023,"score_spread":0.25215656222495453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621565102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34907824,0.0022846137,0.0078114863,0.00077734236,0.0023550093,0.007118553,0.000021429303,0.00018331365,0.63037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98054016,0.000676785,0.0035252883,0.00000554147,0.00015296835,0.000062925916,0.0000018559253,0.000022948261,0.015011529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814767,0.00010115609,0.000731415,0.00031536567,0.00033459225,0.00036978762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728703,0.00021710555,0.00091357384,0.0005571887,0.0009350564,0.000090053516],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016109283,0.0002426531,0.0005807428,0.00066577183,0.0013324218,0.0006873463,0.0012369874,0.00008142188,0.000019034398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037895038,0.0002204346,0.00012939522,0.0004888578,0.00039712986,0.0011253688,0.0011267378,0.00016020107,0.00002210858],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035204523,0.0031040565,0.14832985,0.0017618821,0.0045388034,0.00010481071,0.10436119,0.00002676803,0.000051835766,0.4504498,0.027639337,0.25927964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008720722,0.0013015649,0.16734101,0.0012597636,0.0025765402,0.0000033491597,0.42269504,0.00075492734,0.00045155166,0.0055351434,0.3882789,0.0010814625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010864581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038951883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6314619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013382333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000049594873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623725241","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2016-0273","title":"Capturing knowledge from lessons learned at the work package level in project engineering teams","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Computer science; Project management; Knowledge management; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Work breakdown structure; Project planning; Engineering management; Process management; OPM3; Engineering; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.22579948603522296,"score_gpt":0.4136156167442664,"score_spread":0.18781613070904343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623725241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78530467,0.0025249256,0.0031710407,0.004389137,0.0056161047,0.0007855515,0.000014126493,0.000040111023,0.19815435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96347386,0.00032933633,0.00082337885,0.000023800694,0.00045235612,0.000016702581,0.0000010348274,0.000020842985,0.034858715],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720275,0.00016655002,0.0010566404,0.00039607807,0.0007877568,0.00039020344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968168,0.0004677853,0.0012246764,0.001181152,0.00022545447,0.00008414452],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004403935,0.0002543067,0.0004419705,0.0008467431,0.0006163664,0.000803018,0.0023221127,0.00006869245,0.00026245406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008234725,0.00016198734,0.00025846311,0.0006648502,0.00013144576,0.00069073885,0.0015849944,0.00045565655,0.00047138016],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019813093,0.00020482969,0.06717914,0.00005675782,0.00027413413,0.0001171604,0.0057725618,0.00044432693,0.00009068914,0.0030746486,0.03831803,0.8842696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020452684,0.000057512414,0.3875536,0.00047384072,0.000102081256,0.000015357591,0.003665084,0.0020085243,0.00033711985,0.0018721997,0.6014743,0.0003951432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004888026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009310895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8838744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029578782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007905685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77435213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751652115","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2017-0018","title":"Linking procedural memory with organizational learning through knowledge corridors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambidexterity; Vision; Knowledge management; Perception; Originality; Organizational memory; Organizational learning; Computer science; Empirical research; Psychology; Creativity; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020605384507178696,"score_gpt":0.25538814958848005,"score_spread":0.23478276508130136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751652115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014064202,0.000325058,0.002224132,0.0009816111,0.0022503075,0.0004529324,4.1569638e-7,0.000112832626,0.9795885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97361356,0.00004303672,0.0017241795,0.0006447952,0.0036273256,0.000016162669,0.000014356691,0.00008924741,0.020227332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976767,0.000029587289,0.0008652625,0.00037682176,0.00057421863,0.00047746813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956915,0.000034553665,0.0018612767,0.00050293823,0.0018742636,0.000035507594],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011272087,0.00040579741,0.00048682338,0.0007165146,0.0014259323,0.0011419993,0.0012306662,0.000086807806,0.00022429257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019773805,0.00032778416,0.00016139638,0.00072809187,0.00017917623,0.0019651249,0.00091154396,0.00049633376,0.00080636353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040624425,0.0013896152,0.037844785,0.002866479,0.0009774156,0.00035009996,0.0022473335,0.00030776998,0.000081803504,0.88963395,0.023144498,0.04075001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007146605,0.00022683656,0.014325951,0.001959961,0.0008567021,0.00007661534,0.008933501,0.0042439396,0.00017643785,0.011949331,0.94877,0.0013341113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005958823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005825825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95954937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018121036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008306921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752153172","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2017-0025","title":"Are winemaker consultants just another source of knowledge for innovation?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Business; Marketing; Winery; Value (mathematics); Affect (linguistics); Knowledge management; Wine; Psychology; Creativity; Computer science","score_opus":0.06441914198711428,"score_gpt":0.3060649525866958,"score_spread":0.2416458105995815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752153172","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3705234,0.0008105965,0.009117839,0.011235081,0.0062185056,0.0016501094,0.000015895099,0.00008980313,0.60033876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694302,0.000006375031,0.00043072336,0.00035813014,0.00806832,0.000014246801,0.00000394494,0.00004619762,0.021641828],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844587,0.000012512563,0.0008459025,0.00019421155,0.000226751,0.0002747306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464595,0.00005742242,0.0029574018,0.00045528775,0.0018671103,0.000016824457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009350606,0.00022552865,0.00044970936,0.00062405167,0.00037898778,0.00023635688,0.00071438507,0.000104449566,0.00013942731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005537334,0.0001917276,0.0001539455,0.00047985985,0.00012197967,0.0008582274,0.0003412153,0.0001989439,0.00013237762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030621624,0.0012190504,0.041782256,0.0020360474,0.00070641714,0.00006862881,0.00019341438,0.00005622103,0.00023942303,0.02317541,0.89491904,0.03529787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031113287,0.000033339733,0.08633283,0.0006097706,0.00031212624,0.0000052495993,0.0005926476,0.00047658986,0.00020229409,0.0012624658,0.9068092,0.00025215372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005463614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000072509342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5989068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039927247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035410103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78184247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788184301","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2017-0111","title":"Communities of practice to improve public health outcomes: a systematic review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Rigour; Public health; Public relations; Systematic review; Inclusion (mineral); Population health; Originality; Knowledge management; Medical education; Business; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; MEDLINE; Nursing; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.7189612023493882,"score_gpt":0.7101519181129243,"score_spread":0.008809284236463877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788184301","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[2.0928844e-7,0.9630229,0.0008048505,0.01050705,0.001991497,0.011459389,0.00007610015,0.000022968852,0.012115061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000026853204,0.9668359,0.0035104256,0.025318336,0.0002927565,0.0009123448,0.0000069396137,0.00006322673,0.0030573609],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97277474,0.014723211,0.009929863,0.0002724605,0.0012463224,0.0010534055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9701119,0.007942473,0.01672034,0.0015118974,0.0028482154,0.00086519384],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.04271611,0.00052318274,0.0063411836,0.0015734687,0.000590576,0.00003753437,0.002149968,0.00015972018,0.00021833624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00988658,0.0003485753,0.00071267283,0.0017634825,0.000104336345,0.00043943975,0.001053019,0.0012222836,0.0012797624],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020415523,0.000111778,0.0000025032898,0.8739623,0.0005214471,0.000003879622,0.008013603,7.660409e-9,1.6577882e-9,0.0010243655,0.07973106,0.03662702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020413684,0.00025055575,0.0000025705829,0.43490747,0.0009873552,0.00001396834,0.0059365677,2.0112063e-7,2.2460716e-9,0.0000060661296,0.55756664,0.00012445744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005020817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013548104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4778356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021600483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048705745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789063361","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2016-0457","title":"The effects of knowledge creation process on organizational performance using the BSC approach: the mediating role of intellectual capital","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Balanced scorecard; Structural equation modeling; Organizational performance; Business; Competitive advantage; Extant taxon; Leverage (statistics); Knowledge sharing; Structural capital; Organizational learning; Process management; Computer science; Human capital; Marketing; Financial capital","score_opus":0.010133245637927656,"score_gpt":0.23172137348332,"score_spread":0.22158812784539234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789063361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9366125,0.0011915659,0.0007501353,0.000095326934,0.0006128372,0.00035081524,6.6569453e-7,0.000010200657,0.06037597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736404,0.00017032036,0.00005622969,0.000073629046,0.0018742268,0.0000084629555,0.000003853646,0.000022233406,0.0004269734],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838275,0.000054827568,0.0006742856,0.00014504993,0.00050516275,0.00023792246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701154,0.0004942598,0.00088514853,0.00023971165,0.0013556067,0.000013745881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012176245,0.00019989772,0.0002715632,0.00032826743,0.00071240973,0.00011917196,0.00075564126,0.000046119316,0.000068622285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005912321,0.00009589338,0.0001618455,0.0012766261,0.00033064003,0.00042031458,0.00024411382,0.00023461795,0.000060218797],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004010823,0.0066896,0.05159688,0.01725289,0.008611876,0.000011777968,0.31792644,0.012385774,0.009589026,0.16031767,0.027135529,0.3844717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003450159,0.0019116293,0.019684447,0.0022496413,0.0036321958,0.000044237135,0.08891486,0.7776398,0.047810838,0.0066076797,0.046831798,0.0012226894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008195978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014985487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7652541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000062160296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056930483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5479352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792157346","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0359","title":"Strategic knowledge management and enterprise social media","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Originality; Strategic management; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Sociology","score_opus":0.02815283283741228,"score_gpt":0.2511055698298954,"score_spread":0.22295273699248314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792157346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21563901,0.0018189808,0.00026307773,0.00020468455,0.00152647,0.00019114563,0.0000012231445,0.00004446563,0.7803109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99010056,0.00045835212,0.00022934866,0.00030214014,0.005296756,0.00000800366,0.000005295003,0.000031554315,0.0035679669],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99822867,0.000024113737,0.000688173,0.00027893065,0.00036698228,0.00041315335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988113,0.000041203257,0.00044513843,0.00018791533,0.0004718703,0.000042590073],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007541747,0.0003048818,0.00042675022,0.0010963612,0.00037285348,0.00034100452,0.0004964094,0.00007227556,0.0007664968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015331409,0.00024837724,0.0002446572,0.0007175185,0.00019566237,0.00079249905,0.0005548721,0.00021497719,0.0014153183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010552944,0.0020545542,0.002941079,0.00312721,0.0030476006,0.00040463315,0.010848153,0.0000061680116,0.00012016015,0.3814305,0.22669324,0.36827138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003933432,0.0002839005,0.014850663,0.0005595959,0.0019159523,0.000041066658,0.024564318,0.0034225457,0.00013281639,0.028129157,0.92101395,0.0011525983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000033681736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000076843295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.776743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007988441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014295317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803632083","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2017-0179","title":"Tell me if you can: time pressure, prosocial motivation, perspective taking, and knowledge hiding","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":288,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Mainstream; Causality (physics); Field (mathematics); Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.028897671723267935,"score_gpt":0.31410200950744815,"score_spread":0.2852043377841802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803632083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020215804,0.0030962892,0.00042201788,0.00092453917,0.0015395095,0.00070143695,0.0000027939818,0.00008567458,0.9730119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9105341,0.00033345056,0.00053458445,0.000042994343,0.0036405895,0.000012227448,0.00000104702,0.000035490993,0.08486555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976275,0.0003289081,0.0006029974,0.00038561874,0.00050962757,0.0005453632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99747187,0.00013352328,0.0006693311,0.0002073509,0.0012847722,0.00023315097],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002376747,0.00026848906,0.00041868974,0.00058180257,0.001070585,0.0003154198,0.0006256457,0.00011932151,0.00037682222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005611292,0.00025543667,0.00016352441,0.00076084246,0.00045863877,0.00051929994,0.00048361512,0.000270663,0.00019373998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019726642,0.0012053925,0.021425588,0.0004606335,0.0023794158,0.000067808,0.30715004,0.000006859469,0.0002400737,0.48307878,0.11963088,0.06415727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001977078,0.00040783608,0.018298816,0.00050621846,0.0008885127,0.0000064390906,0.038856085,0.00058687245,0.00022216902,0.008748264,0.9288205,0.00068122917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000061194376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036481876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8903183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004896111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001842365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804325449","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0342","title":"An agential realist perspective on the construction and flow of knowledge: the case of dynamic entanglement and “cuts” within an aircraft engine manufacturing workplace","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Knowledge management; Phenomenon; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Embodied cognition; Quantum entanglement; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01592300876555207,"score_gpt":0.3274176499316851,"score_spread":0.311494641166133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804325449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709289,0.00018664586,0.005042372,0.0007387628,0.0009800686,0.0006405083,0.00001675083,0.000009747605,0.021456223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982479,0.00009131638,0.0011842627,0.000022437587,0.00025288426,0.00000480215,0.0000016524975,0.0000060269927,0.0001886718],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986871,0.00037717022,0.00050211145,0.00009871059,0.00020623402,0.0001286991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875957,0.00008625157,0.0005773944,0.00015198253,0.00035950373,0.000065275206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023638525,0.00009972945,0.00015794257,0.00014498645,0.0005276855,0.00007698108,0.00015823745,0.000030198713,0.00006475813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030108877,0.00006288261,0.000042243173,0.00014378509,0.00042695823,0.00034381635,0.000053479576,0.000094259914,0.00000139158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003119851,0.00021051214,0.00017870912,0.00015498207,0.0003457868,0.000018375515,0.47318318,0.00007864349,0.000119602315,0.40015352,0.00077177584,0.12447291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011889623,0.0010471242,0.0018842743,0.00019475965,0.00020669715,0.00013641756,0.97972524,0.002988909,0.0019811625,0.0033275427,0.0071621793,0.00015675687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023405552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031286275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.506542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019320213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004445453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4058584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804852660","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0325","title":"Absorption, combination and desorption: knowledge-oriented boundary spanning capacities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Absorptive capacity; Originality; Knowledge management; Absorption capacity; Business; Value (mathematics); Boundary spanning; Tacit knowledge; Empirical research; Absorption (acoustics); Computer science; Process management; Creativity; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.016995442539834642,"score_gpt":0.23991883475731474,"score_spread":0.2229233922174801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804852660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75133663,0.0021253037,0.0033081572,0.0003197746,0.0017050152,0.00016507458,6.602583e-7,0.000048477912,0.24099092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915911,0.00019283537,0.00025701214,0.00026520452,0.002744689,0.000005207341,0.000006993979,0.000019570349,0.0049174028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877375,0.00001943526,0.0005280924,0.00017693057,0.00025894996,0.00024284181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982631,0.00002864262,0.00040863967,0.00014032192,0.0011329397,0.000026316618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007572914,0.00019435959,0.0002724258,0.00093148556,0.0004241009,0.0002707107,0.00020207156,0.000053783617,0.00043488183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049394137,0.00016582612,0.00012823986,0.00071149674,0.00027817048,0.0013453095,0.00019868142,0.00016538419,0.0006588609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010729713,0.0021609422,0.02757884,0.0035893577,0.002079942,0.00009600713,0.020479929,0.000050414317,0.0009415528,0.43097904,0.25474018,0.25623083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018661782,0.0003303303,0.017393287,0.00049835123,0.00062699226,0.00004048068,0.008296308,0.009621499,0.00027089566,0.0099517545,0.95059204,0.00051186106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011028492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054584783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6958519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008712254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020504496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8468543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893498514","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2017-0389","title":"Secrets and knowledge management strategy: the role of secrecy appropriation mechanisms in realizing value from firm innovations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Conceptualization; Appropriation; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Originality; Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Business; Creativity; Epistemology; Computer security; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017449400544822986,"score_gpt":0.2488993587615785,"score_spread":0.2314499582167555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893498514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043168794,0.0011875608,0.0073849806,0.00045612283,0.0012001434,0.0010967582,0.0000043213017,0.000056945035,0.94544435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951782,0.00013017155,0.0022584212,0.00030099307,0.0011409028,0.000038563616,0.000020360196,0.00004555197,0.00088683446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972232,0.00008504847,0.0014106352,0.00039321382,0.000489881,0.0003980186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973494,0.00006920833,0.0011437838,0.00045858533,0.00095035066,0.000028670744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023008685,0.00035413614,0.00047752206,0.0016158837,0.00028867053,0.00027253682,0.0006963456,0.00010359234,0.00010215253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052758576,0.0002829101,0.00012290095,0.002414756,0.00014558133,0.00073536613,0.0008123155,0.00030145096,0.00011948517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009075964,0.0004159878,0.0009914851,0.0003451836,0.00029948092,0.000012381512,0.00079888117,0.000016248714,0.00032206028,0.91843426,0.0011281287,0.07714514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067568976,0.00028798718,0.054757964,0.001670657,0.001023671,0.000009337456,0.05700087,0.024382547,0.0009869023,0.55748904,0.2944778,0.0011563005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006203735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027615094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9520094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016471994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004045582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996233},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894971745","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2017-0260","title":"Unpacking knowledge management practices in China: do institution, national and organizational culture matter?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualization; Knowledge management; Organizational culture; Context (archaeology); Personal knowledge management; Organizational learning; Originality; Business; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.026129713016957493,"score_gpt":0.34099978474339016,"score_spread":0.31487007172643267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894971745","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017875707,0.0021897901,0.00081392284,0.00075255183,0.0013284248,0.00042378556,0.0000015055715,0.00003346792,0.97658086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9724167,0.001279164,0.002150404,0.00010126183,0.0014752095,0.000011855968,0.0000034311406,0.000022171076,0.022539807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976781,0.0002499925,0.0006706423,0.000342389,0.0006712174,0.00038768418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981635,0.00006079495,0.0007100514,0.00014887404,0.00076667144,0.00015008883],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026520672,0.000227139,0.0002803592,0.0009041101,0.00067894155,0.0003717547,0.00057845755,0.00009499494,0.00055101246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021167978,0.00021145128,0.00007802722,0.0013636254,0.00030598705,0.00095409364,0.00047348446,0.0002536927,0.00048054592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007798781,0.00086104276,0.053191755,0.00044979047,0.00052648317,0.00008451195,0.039202645,0.000017836484,0.000012579148,0.81946254,0.06545219,0.020660646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019359586,0.0001091117,0.105649866,0.0006943509,0.00021308713,0.000016143433,0.016848078,0.00017093858,0.000020007947,0.011388058,0.86251026,0.0004441399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011102524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005031564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95454097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005261439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012736196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8622733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897931383","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2018-0019","title":"The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between information technology and innovation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Business; Enabling; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Product (mathematics); Product innovation; Competition (biology); Competitive advantage; New product development; Sample (material); Supply chain management; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.01997972892887239,"score_gpt":0.2566039330395841,"score_spread":0.23662420411071172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897931383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3995569,0.00023993876,0.0015491089,0.01811153,0.0012868058,0.0011074134,0.0000034790337,0.000063270454,0.57808155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981339,0.000011578067,0.0002135161,0.00036745664,0.0009113408,0.000017110555,0.000010051797,0.000009686363,0.00032534442],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849,0.00003401626,0.0008970633,0.000089347275,0.00032799278,0.00016159138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99660283,0.00025719972,0.001304666,0.00021197178,0.001616621,0.000006687664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002508568,0.00012988613,0.00015779342,0.0020601377,0.00053962495,0.00024141373,0.0003314204,0.000061022853,0.000010329872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009930184,0.000081146456,0.000031544616,0.0046269638,0.00016468599,0.0007473622,0.00021813849,0.00019104686,0.000089298366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031058553,0.000026134361,0.03653289,0.00007027218,0.00005041187,2.2892166e-7,0.00033706817,0.0000015627336,0.00002561976,0.91969997,0.0027430197,0.040481772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015165911,0.00022302299,0.1446595,0.0003285646,0.0001887301,0.0000017434271,0.026546042,0.0017250287,0.00062101585,0.1899951,0.6339082,0.00028648388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000010441656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000011014297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72970486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000063297564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023660872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41504133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898158641","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2018-0223","title":"Creativity from paradoxical experience: a theory of how individuals achieve creativity while adopting paradoxical frames","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Originality; Extant taxon; Flexibility (engineering); Cognitive psychology; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04387076116909676,"score_gpt":0.28540085457961584,"score_spread":0.24153009341051906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898158641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42184237,0.0005507308,0.022129094,0.0013296177,0.0020923398,0.00075317913,0.00001325196,0.00011269553,0.5511767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99077463,0.00003960071,0.0038833497,0.0005614393,0.0030549804,0.00002736045,0.000012695721,0.000044501692,0.0016014166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968059,0.00017753913,0.0011503486,0.00047813766,0.00085685786,0.00053121464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965529,0.0002928239,0.001564913,0.00054897193,0.00097614573,0.00006427157],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024932332,0.00045057284,0.000840867,0.00089021213,0.00032530454,0.00039923578,0.0009239012,0.00016206996,0.00066761806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004459823,0.0003738457,0.0003478125,0.0013000453,0.0004767577,0.0011754768,0.00091731636,0.00042906866,0.00021986962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00075474184,0.0028464198,0.059138235,0.0005906013,0.0011589488,0.00008695396,0.0043355874,0.0000058941127,0.00034433734,0.7825478,0.01816466,0.13002583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007581879,0.0008666635,0.15247415,0.0019598831,0.0016690491,0.000015994061,0.042284094,0.0024915554,0.002593786,0.08991538,0.6961204,0.002027211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000010614358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020261312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69263244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011270411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000045711073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898166599","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2017-0531","title":"Evasive knowledge hiding in academia: when competitive individuals are asked to collaborate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Knowledge management; Originality; Moderation; Tacit knowledge; Knowledge transfer; Situational ethics; Competitive advantage; Sample (material); Interdependence; Knowledge value chain; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Organizational learning; Business; Marketing; Political science; Creativity","score_opus":0.041452618814990634,"score_gpt":0.35696635085472017,"score_spread":0.31551373203972954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898166599","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095149726,0.001379181,0.00043103733,0.0031768559,0.002652495,0.0011694521,0.0000073598676,0.00006577161,0.89596814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97189605,0.00038185663,0.0017566251,0.0003461942,0.0021698745,0.0000370543,0.0000014872829,0.000040333798,0.023370527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648774,0.0006391946,0.0009923386,0.0004191741,0.00067216915,0.00078938407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99721515,0.00026194513,0.0006421072,0.00026164687,0.0012226808,0.000396494],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004558725,0.00031274537,0.00063930196,0.0015406741,0.0005595395,0.00026900615,0.0012415726,0.00033450886,0.0003526427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005642217,0.00030922392,0.00016549788,0.0021704535,0.00025982442,0.0005838789,0.000801713,0.0008923425,0.0010271603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028063668,0.001387767,0.10856589,0.000451853,0.0011580503,0.00035818433,0.30054715,0.000027415355,0.00010536325,0.3011367,0.21085633,0.075124644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001681969,0.0002612048,0.028499743,0.001301466,0.00018294,0.0000018416997,0.06515982,0.000044525168,0.00020964131,0.003070076,0.8991247,0.0004620939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016564829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029108801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8767463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097326085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023009525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902430595","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0358","title":"Organizational knowledge retention and knowledge loss","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge value chain; Organizational learning; Personal knowledge management; Explicit knowledge; Knowledge transfer; Body of knowledge; Procedural knowledge; Computer science; Domain knowledge; Knowledge engineering; Knowledge integration; Knowledge survey; Agency (philosophy); Knowledge economy; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Formative assessment; Sociology","score_opus":0.030218052774744767,"score_gpt":0.3117506316888492,"score_spread":0.28153257891410444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902430595","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036507826,0.004244972,0.0021511556,0.0005431795,0.0032341017,0.00039822844,0.0000015521804,0.000083743544,0.95283526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94229275,0.001185276,0.0011029183,0.000039141694,0.0033036114,0.0000065961563,0.0000029663327,0.000037668393,0.052029047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976564,0.000362593,0.00072898716,0.0003390446,0.0004186899,0.00049430836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997621,0.0001242313,0.0003918087,0.0002394593,0.0013279177,0.00029558525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002874335,0.00025066838,0.00036520825,0.0007468774,0.00092221826,0.0002458831,0.0006479846,0.00012568368,0.0005809424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002144712,0.00023932969,0.00015345585,0.0011959334,0.0006335498,0.0005284553,0.000545047,0.00023248572,0.00072323583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011048024,0.0010917605,0.01604137,0.0004268623,0.0007073935,0.00006463605,0.045703948,8.73734e-7,0.00008841575,0.7600485,0.059795145,0.11592058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001645264,0.00027719722,0.010262775,0.00038384256,0.00036414087,0.000015996638,0.0068651284,0.00022804033,0.00012310212,0.011824312,0.9675627,0.000447526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007340218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000527261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90776753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003203704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019416079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97595817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916578330","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2018-0636","title":"Overcoming knowledge barriers to health care through continuous learning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Health care; Assimilation (phonology); Bureaucracy; Business; Computer science; Process management; Political science","score_opus":0.01827557174469146,"score_gpt":0.32735893467288124,"score_spread":0.3090833629281898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916578330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041172925,0.007210324,0.0016984153,0.001050533,0.003579973,0.0009789917,0.0000010150577,0.000094904724,0.9442129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94095886,0.0005856265,0.0019418506,0.0003889377,0.00089900306,0.000011799906,0.0000018112127,0.000046951704,0.05516514],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969569,0.0004935927,0.000810358,0.00036707037,0.0005876751,0.00078439945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979296,0.00013326135,0.00049424736,0.00028828983,0.0005440195,0.0006106012],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024540802,0.00027137354,0.0006298883,0.00054213504,0.0008281046,0.00031307968,0.0008998285,0.00008782091,0.0005876689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029022293,0.00026829436,0.0003006996,0.00087399787,0.0000717147,0.0006674542,0.0005206342,0.00046510476,0.0010206548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016143023,0.00027154305,0.023714807,0.0010581341,0.0007393742,0.00007275229,0.5488834,0.0005134683,0.000033330278,0.13802737,0.07193861,0.21458583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00088646467,0.0002871984,0.0006704128,0.00042106363,0.00006769458,0.0000016810101,0.14101458,0.000029619965,0.00001395223,0.00017922593,0.8561623,0.00026577376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005723352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005288838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89978594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010401623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037983246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953515272","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2018-0190","title":"Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":584,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Structural equation modeling; Social capital; Business; Knowledge value chain; Common-method variance; Competitive advantage; Explicit knowledge; Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Organizational learning; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07799425124846517,"score_gpt":0.40719295428815167,"score_spread":0.3291987030396865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953515272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91050965,0.0005846655,0.00008438945,0.000054857665,0.00038781122,0.00060914183,0.0000016283656,0.000016677974,0.08775115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99800944,0.000051122082,0.0004956626,0.000008421036,0.00023700127,0.000008332733,0.000003978371,0.000022190443,0.0011638587],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964922,0.0007969947,0.0015379299,0.00034636314,0.0004970586,0.00032944835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99656355,0.00025518576,0.0013089511,0.00030331034,0.001503533,0.00006547117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0110573275,0.0002063638,0.00055504654,0.0006509832,0.00033810546,0.00009641639,0.00074517063,0.00012891796,0.00011662974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008171569,0.00018086821,0.000097817705,0.002059682,0.00024484206,0.0007013072,0.0005362769,0.00030203658,0.000012978819],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013245,0.001249006,0.31609675,0.0011555089,0.0002247129,0.0000016448483,0.24341758,0.00004393058,0.003002249,0.19748929,0.00005399284,0.23713288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004205426,0.0009389456,0.79081494,0.00083842187,0.00042165638,0.0000028009727,0.16071934,0.006506252,0.0026378012,0.02364054,0.008454168,0.00081973587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007819595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00093328586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47471815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003470134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017990306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7375592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961448545","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2018-0007","title":"Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: conceptualization, typology, and empirical demonstration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Conceptualization; Public relations; Critical Incident Technique; Business; Value (mathematics); Interpersonal communication; Knowledge management; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; Creativity; Epistemology","score_opus":0.058321516861819106,"score_gpt":0.3747423233515909,"score_spread":0.3164208064897718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961448545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5346572,0.0030456728,0.0006351985,0.00015713632,0.0018029233,0.00091646286,0.000003458536,0.000044304194,0.4587377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98522305,0.00062499,0.00052192115,0.00003456248,0.00054987916,0.00001885897,0.000007423659,0.00003121537,0.012988072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973164,0.00045186203,0.0009565122,0.00042871138,0.00041069512,0.00043582323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997627,0.00015083778,0.00063636753,0.00034364904,0.0009944943,0.00024761423],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022707635,0.00028366095,0.00056836766,0.0006160309,0.00032387502,0.00012138014,0.0006094767,0.0001733328,0.0004303937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013630824,0.0002701275,0.00016824767,0.00070265355,0.000519522,0.0009887897,0.00030225547,0.0002650424,0.00017311297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032562605,0.0036688675,0.20524563,0.0006636273,0.00072120904,0.000042686344,0.1964257,0.0000076484175,0.00046351185,0.479479,0.010946322,0.10201016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007156609,0.002951057,0.123074524,0.0009522839,0.0019889271,0.000054981312,0.22033907,0.0012408495,0.0007270969,0.015552897,0.62425905,0.0017026559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000022936096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000877902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6133127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030315635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002695801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970273183","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2018-0608","title":"Challenges and progress in integrating knowledge: cases from clothing and textiles in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Global and Cross-Cultural Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Restructuring; Competition (biology); Business; Knowledge sharing; Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Process (computing); Marketing; Industrial organization; Public relations; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04005216363872854,"score_gpt":0.3201979760142499,"score_spread":0.28014581237552133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970273183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8006334,0.065825276,0.0000022657327,0.0005559741,0.00030746704,0.00032385963,0.0000011655053,0.000012410445,0.13233818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548405,0.003088971,0.00036334418,0.000014062943,0.0001297427,0.000008256204,3.3825364e-7,0.0000073238944,0.00090392324],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867314,0.00017411375,0.00040633226,0.00023486462,0.00021946897,0.00029206672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994,0.00011827431,0.0002028575,0.00008967024,0.000092143826,0.000097007054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001049428,0.00014901065,0.00029871686,0.00023734543,0.000105529136,0.00017164033,0.0002291441,0.000058557333,0.000020203679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006723141,0.000114073904,0.00004617779,0.00023311781,0.0001421189,0.00034969443,0.00026581576,0.00019752636,0.000016959359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006031337,0.00031198276,0.065668695,0.0002822855,0.00008285272,0.00018132971,0.30075124,0.000004312578,0.0000073312126,0.040328767,0.00018735604,0.5921335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018380743,0.00023742506,0.2933927,0.0018082178,0.00006586148,0.0000053499484,0.58900106,0.0001579026,0.000005394236,0.0038769257,0.109257296,0.00035377275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006208922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038162954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59177977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014853048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024154228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46517986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970551859","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2019-0084","title":"Value creation through big data application process management: the case of the oil and gas industry","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Originality; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Business; Business value; Process (computing); Marketing; Qualitative research; Data science; Computer science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.07096832312083672,"score_gpt":0.31740436423144236,"score_spread":0.24643604111060563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970551859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46603352,0.0026849825,0.008347771,0.0076471465,0.0037357877,0.0012180023,0.000023825762,0.00005141729,0.51025754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99608195,0.00043158192,0.00015252404,0.0003434475,0.00081375014,0.00001230199,0.000013315405,0.000019466272,0.0021316474],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871325,0.000026863407,0.0005198565,0.00026506576,0.00029909884,0.00017586348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979296,0.000039502567,0.00080899516,0.0009260993,0.00028509623,0.000010725331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092599646,0.00017158792,0.00020688618,0.00016359187,0.00018946728,0.0001827179,0.0012846702,0.000079020116,0.00004270939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036139278,0.00009890236,0.000056237266,0.0008448355,0.00011369224,0.0011609133,0.0012421681,0.00028831378,0.00005076023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007630562,0.00034173488,0.0061481977,0.0033273273,0.0002949414,0.000057490477,0.00026556684,0.00025060365,0.00003463819,0.10542636,0.007639377,0.87613744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017870059,0.000033992714,0.014168785,0.0015334234,0.0016643737,0.00037313724,0.008640286,0.0155049255,0.00021612845,0.021225113,0.93432236,0.00053046754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006387325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000046951947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.926683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026816011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016967344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40331212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971263290","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2018-0734","title":"Are we in this together? Knowledge hiding in teams, collective prosocial motivation and leader-member exchange","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Originality; Social psychology; Social exchange theory; Value (mathematics); Knowledge sharing; Field (mathematics); Knowledge management; Creativity","score_opus":0.06572621867375857,"score_gpt":0.32430644832566063,"score_spread":0.2585802296519021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971263290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2886155,0.0057829623,0.000044392615,0.0010481068,0.0011513049,0.0012008082,8.927571e-7,0.00002805355,0.702128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93100363,0.0014495432,0.00015234716,0.000038090646,0.00048468422,0.000030933566,6.055985e-7,0.000025965499,0.06681419],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977258,0.00045208083,0.00065547496,0.00031652226,0.0003768253,0.000473286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880105,0.00021094359,0.0005389166,0.00013572218,0.00020748176,0.00010585916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029589762,0.000215122,0.00048426393,0.0011108543,0.00021152008,0.00013775751,0.00036778222,0.00013758094,0.00030156024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020506521,0.00021180067,0.0001291084,0.0012592317,0.000095656615,0.00055876747,0.0002985002,0.00038836335,0.00009929545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021056372,0.0013353815,0.6101684,0.0020573796,0.00028943256,0.00012745611,0.25195554,0.000031791875,0.000054663535,0.016138313,0.028211264,0.089419775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009293565,0.00036659098,0.3128725,0.0067227576,0.0002443558,0.0000045478673,0.21742083,0.0008593402,0.000112157504,0.0077217007,0.4431381,0.0012435678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000045726032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004573318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64238816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001306869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012419862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86369807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975124582","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2018-0738","title":"Knowledge management and social entrepreneurship education: lessons learned from an exploratory two-country study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Social entrepreneurship; Value (mathematics); Exploratory research; Public relations; Sociology; Marketing; Business; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.051533042515351485,"score_gpt":0.3166417980420635,"score_spread":0.265108755526712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975124582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8461754,0.0035544953,0.000017084747,0.0013043826,0.0031041787,0.00085966784,0.0000033853455,0.000077868826,0.14490354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99347055,0.00038006794,0.00011030069,0.0007307373,0.0026545003,0.000046165635,0.000013832928,0.000050195395,0.0025436282],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975096,0.000119774064,0.00080215983,0.0006353016,0.0005006115,0.00043256735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982961,0.000062765495,0.0007129667,0.00047602868,0.000396491,0.000055641398],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095249433,0.00041325582,0.00057901646,0.0006326839,0.0003800516,0.0005556035,0.00073794526,0.00006356426,0.00024799505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015662416,0.00036922068,0.00015676748,0.0005685823,0.00008781644,0.0016374132,0.00091646664,0.00029907012,0.00048821382],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046783552,0.007997642,0.51496565,0.0012915861,0.001936443,0.00013372012,0.011781645,0.00005966393,0.00005596959,0.08937345,0.02348562,0.34845078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00660345,0.00030529653,0.29520765,0.00054133794,0.001783521,0.000005587936,0.17368548,0.00012670322,0.000018053579,0.00775902,0.5128645,0.001099457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000036648984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023038404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4893788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011378567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004515488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975815114","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2018-0707","title":"Entrepreneurs’ ingenuity and self-imposed ethical constraints: creating sustainability-oriented new ventures and knowledge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Ingenuity; Creativity; Sustainability; Entrepreneurship; Flexibility (engineering); Knowledge management; Business; Management; Computer science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.007446344930212658,"score_gpt":0.24635285720253364,"score_spread":0.238906512272321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975815114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88548976,0.0006618141,0.00050289615,0.0020185125,0.001279171,0.0006166349,6.1428705e-7,0.00006446271,0.10936611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953929,0.00009659426,0.0009501046,0.00088580814,0.0005566488,0.0000039669576,0.0000032503824,0.000020259467,0.0020904592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850994,0.00004415444,0.00069071364,0.00028740024,0.00018477342,0.00028302404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986779,0.0000968726,0.000491215,0.00016422191,0.0005154557,0.0000543187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014836834,0.0002195605,0.00036654164,0.0004340307,0.00017016922,0.0002439588,0.0001825288,0.00012928364,0.00019796225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016705193,0.00020117272,0.000079998536,0.00028703726,0.000101509235,0.00041689604,0.00042115976,0.00041851355,0.00006758582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002096482,0.00094976666,0.16579778,0.0031926222,0.0008721201,0.00007581981,0.010587683,0.000019925794,0.00007541063,0.5689043,0.023581795,0.22573313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005737121,0.00009466905,0.16971606,0.00037908845,0.000284968,0.000031128675,0.011450773,0.0010994814,0.0000366754,0.009544868,0.8010173,0.0006078814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008339623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009756651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7774355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023059794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015103779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8203586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986065267","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2018-0776","title":"Transformational leadership and employee knowledge sharing: explore the mediating roles of psychological safety and team efficacy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Psychology; Psychological safety; Transactional leadership; Structural equation modeling; Originality; Context (archaeology); Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Creativity","score_opus":0.09797560522189058,"score_gpt":0.34909327378124133,"score_spread":0.25111766855935075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986065267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5843173,0.005327546,0.0002953168,0.0011768235,0.0008183388,0.0007113849,0.0000016397186,0.000033436554,0.40731817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948088,0.0013982144,0.00027254244,0.000044757704,0.0003362095,0.000005251385,0.0000016059842,0.000013698914,0.003118943],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813336,0.00020667173,0.00070035225,0.00022613234,0.00040627425,0.00032718363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988327,0.00036230587,0.0003245319,0.00017669503,0.00017195163,0.00013183111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030368497,0.00017537225,0.0003561023,0.00026797372,0.00034465388,0.00011418076,0.00057948293,0.000081881655,0.0001001954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012301013,0.00012304027,0.00013424843,0.00033808622,0.00028001337,0.00037489124,0.000251417,0.00028889583,0.00003122216],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047945554,0.00092898775,0.14111,0.0011795908,0.00074065936,0.00001216191,0.30989945,0.00006518658,0.00007540258,0.18926106,0.003416953,0.3528311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0076408917,0.000834385,0.3649351,0.0013883064,0.0006548293,0.000020454992,0.22622314,0.0012964954,0.00007675029,0.0044213003,0.39167637,0.000831991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002299764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007203746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41049144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070287235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026267571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5017437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013885712","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2019-0426","title":"Measuring knowledge spillovers transfer from scholars in business schools: validation of a multiple-item scale","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Nomological network; Scale (ratio); Confirmatory factor analysis; Originality; Reliability (semiconductor); Sample (material); Knowledge management; Exploratory factor analysis; Construct (python library); Psychology; Computer science; Structural equation modeling; Management science; Psychometrics; Social psychology; Creativity; Engineering","score_opus":0.04055423570706682,"score_gpt":0.22999681518146303,"score_spread":0.18944257947439622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013885712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9732555,0.0010508909,0.0019113494,0.0004999213,0.00043050296,0.0002316087,0.0000031989189,0.000022839706,0.022594143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982151,0.00021398473,0.00024263507,0.0002138888,0.0009448344,0.0000054807974,0.000012063635,0.00002908416,0.00012295747],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803406,0.00003616172,0.0009795066,0.00025973545,0.0004235097,0.00026700023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986182,0.000063323336,0.00033200192,0.00016909484,0.000774154,0.00004322481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006755752,0.00025065817,0.00054445077,0.000887452,0.000082926366,0.00016739646,0.0005000255,0.00007523064,0.00024557285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024861432,0.00022157525,0.0002793517,0.0017640344,0.00003716795,0.0018145714,0.00018601715,0.0003423904,0.000353238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005505866,0.0049288757,0.708379,0.011463161,0.0036328128,0.00032113536,0.019868722,0.015764384,0.028661765,0.004846074,0.017748633,0.17887957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0240208,0.0004888497,0.5394077,0.0069960337,0.004095691,0.000011308592,0.024169771,0.10061287,0.03700486,0.0024315706,0.25755852,0.003202061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000084272884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012605701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2398099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010852316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038261325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9035576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014384867","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2019-0337","title":"Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the perspective of the target","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Workplace Violence and Bullying","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Originality; Value (mathematics); Innocence; Gratification; Public relations; Incentive; Business; Psychology; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Political science; Creativity; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0447906346627498,"score_gpt":0.33687272581663785,"score_spread":0.29208209115388806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014384867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5048461,0.0104880445,0.00036771022,0.0058555957,0.0026981838,0.0018578782,0.000019876916,0.000041243897,0.47382537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995342,0.00045977085,0.000251966,0.00008243427,0.0009498801,0.00001671055,4.6411236e-7,0.000022999515,0.0028737679],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974563,0.00053762324,0.0007301184,0.00029585385,0.0006090467,0.0003710535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971846,0.00015569432,0.00083698356,0.00039431817,0.0012489703,0.000179453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020988185,0.00022992716,0.00045857948,0.00016185928,0.00051640894,0.000061600505,0.0015471099,0.00008829095,0.00027080925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029748917,0.00014069509,0.00039314228,0.0011242045,0.0006865648,0.00045104398,0.00039199606,0.0004241773,0.000047445556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049098424,0.003414729,0.0211503,0.00035663886,0.0007576892,0.000034993252,0.75537884,0.000035371148,0.0014701368,0.16947852,0.014810123,0.032621685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001775784,0.001286976,0.019138068,0.0010873564,0.0010437019,0.000013752358,0.7177588,0.0001774339,0.0039204867,0.009362124,0.2438658,0.0005697144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008308336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036280186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4904959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037054825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004653235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5737379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019770203","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2020-0081","title":"Big data for small and medium-sized enterprises (SME): a knowledge management model","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Computer science; Data science; Knowledge management; Conceptual model; Small and medium-sized enterprises; Context (archaeology); Business intelligence; Exploit; Business; Data mining; Database","score_opus":0.20425817568480795,"score_gpt":0.3195073242493034,"score_spread":0.11524914856449545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019770203","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008428437,0.011914118,0.7209363,0.01316907,0.0070924307,0.0035059091,0.00017302568,0.00032011967,0.23446062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9470499,0.004052269,0.028607965,0.0045440365,0.010606494,0.00011068668,0.0002595872,0.0002066859,0.0045623817],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749404,0.000021392796,0.0009940254,0.0006499773,0.00036082906,0.000479721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794227,0.00008448769,0.0006724171,0.000724404,0.0004813354,0.00009508715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010346477,0.00042157288,0.00061221066,0.0005615848,0.00021827556,0.0004818565,0.0021110475,0.0000876135,0.00005082259],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001552112,0.00035495375,0.00017475185,0.000683712,0.00010964066,0.0012234042,0.003148999,0.00023522497,0.00013741881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013743177,0.0013797758,0.001175578,0.011223754,0.0014783787,0.00016151942,0.0005378617,0.0002359911,0.0001846677,0.033807117,0.35417905,0.594262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028865982,0.000068662695,0.00088096515,0.0005717396,0.0012801102,0.000010374248,0.0009778403,0.06548657,0.000053145577,0.0023700674,0.9248695,0.000544436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000036505962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000041666397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93862146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000510979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053931275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022055341","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2019-0493","title":"Replicate or adapt? Franchising and organizational routines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Franchising Strategies and Performance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Replicate; Originality; Plural; Robustness (evolution); Marketing; Business; Value (mathematics); Replication (statistics); Knowledge management; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02775813749417658,"score_gpt":0.22796407190501608,"score_spread":0.2002059344108395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022055341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4784406,0.010880816,0.02359381,0.036093112,0.0041414676,0.0009496289,0.0000049093833,0.00032892133,0.4455667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930586,0.00024565437,0.0013263498,0.0019541786,0.002858357,0.0000013371738,0.0000023035357,0.000025410502,0.0005277941],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904615,0.0000063541365,0.00041963835,0.00016571747,0.00019578752,0.00016634962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992676,0.000020010599,0.00035726686,0.00010422416,0.00022204721,0.000028870956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023805692,0.00014758723,0.00022483409,0.00014865302,0.00016113574,0.00025519595,0.0002286748,0.00003079144,0.000173577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057190227,0.00010945846,0.000054499615,0.00053784956,0.000038899994,0.0007045357,0.0001811507,0.00013278145,0.00008952044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018761657,0.0007028785,0.05562887,0.005513471,0.00094699056,0.0005077156,0.002207913,0.0018849357,0.00082522,0.30392253,0.4190276,0.20695572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019676907,0.00010796254,0.025279073,0.0002511764,0.00020591507,0.00003578519,0.0008930859,0.013522211,0.000039093775,0.0015818379,0.95574045,0.000375694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035803123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000052071837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5367129,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015496507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019166806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44635865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029866646","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2019-0274","title":"Knowledge-sharing efforts and employee creative behavior: the invigorating roles of passion for work, time sufficiency and procedural justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Originality; Creativity; Knowledge management; Passion; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Procedural justice; Organizational learning; Work behavior; Psychology; Public relations; Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.044384277114042726,"score_gpt":0.321384725401652,"score_spread":0.2770004482876093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029866646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7937855,0.007889019,0.003044311,0.003290904,0.00069533417,0.0026351146,0.0000050755866,0.00007887001,0.18857586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957338,0.0004174063,0.00082346954,0.0000878661,0.00048870605,0.000035817106,0.0000011244429,0.00002154543,0.0023902943],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984193,0.00011791389,0.00059033296,0.00026479582,0.00028622177,0.00032146013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986357,0.00022650186,0.00045895053,0.00011548277,0.00038261522,0.00018072707],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015845262,0.00018912072,0.00036117114,0.00017579306,0.00061655807,0.00017147732,0.00044702823,0.000060180024,0.000021511512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038109615,0.00013868282,0.000115242336,0.0005137133,0.00023425161,0.00033156786,0.00051176426,0.00018551665,0.0000063506563],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007098863,0.0012212563,0.06624281,0.0042223395,0.000929066,0.000055537537,0.3711371,0.00010172478,0.0004589955,0.07784823,0.035318233,0.44175482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011289865,0.004393658,0.16109787,0.0067229834,0.011244841,0.00002288022,0.3521741,0.02034576,0.0012719348,0.005952651,0.42249727,0.0029861657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000035829462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005120337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43876866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057589627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052440202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56553215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037751193","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2020-0075","title":"The influence of investors’ opinions of human capital and multitasking on firm performance: a knowledge management perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Human multitasking; Business; Context (archaeology); Human capital; Marketing; Industrial organization; Perspective (graphical); Knowledge management; Economics; Psychology; Market economy","score_opus":0.023914537137910363,"score_gpt":0.25258577056756765,"score_spread":0.22867123342965728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037751193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551057,0.0013082579,0.000040841336,0.0006349677,0.0002847435,0.00036387713,0.000003884149,0.00001414728,0.042243563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983353,0.00063688017,0.000094161885,0.00016442382,0.00039777625,0.000010483124,0.0000013416098,0.000021364502,0.0003382873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846417,0.00002145033,0.00069532776,0.00023546361,0.00034386045,0.00023970587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804467,0.000055443666,0.0011278286,0.00023695343,0.0005011363,0.00003394724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048738148,0.00022697443,0.00036808135,0.00026162327,0.00026016458,0.00007022152,0.0005357042,0.000039422826,0.000009222341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005519902,0.00017236991,0.0001417231,0.0006178264,0.0001877408,0.0005897776,0.0004304107,0.00022681049,0.000031341533],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007243922,0.0013519811,0.08651013,0.00592245,0.0011931289,0.000102340106,0.008975657,0.00224517,0.00050410937,0.8443276,0.019347541,0.028795484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033271662,0.0006056635,0.89519036,0.0018678092,0.00039981148,0.0000044451235,0.010286586,0.000888847,0.00016509325,0.0020318944,0.08478159,0.00045074092],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002149094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000032991516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8422957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089754605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024568964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7029041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041678747","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2019-0741","title":"Information technology-enabled explorative learning and competitive performance in industrial service SMEs: a configurational analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; HEC Montréal; Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative comparative analysis; Knowledge management; Dynamic capabilities; Competitive advantage; Computer science; Equifinality; Service (business); Context (archaeology); Fuzzy set; Originality; Process management; Business; Fuzzy logic; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Qualitative research; Machine learning","score_opus":0.02649732276811659,"score_gpt":0.23459532206088085,"score_spread":0.20809799929276426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041678747","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16676396,0.00021464148,0.004329276,0.012277794,0.0005839091,0.0010240038,0.0000024070844,0.00013861341,0.8146654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769264,0.000048700644,0.0003231038,0.001319865,0.00041026348,0.000020578169,0.000027974946,0.000010034513,0.0001468198],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847144,0.000032359185,0.00082833105,0.00015093561,0.00030295926,0.00021396368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821067,0.000028671722,0.00076333655,0.000078165285,0.0008945731,0.000024588395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007205243,0.00020144833,0.00039615366,0.002368566,0.00015104002,0.00025325752,0.0002485756,0.00008015358,0.00010535357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001264719,0.00018694489,0.00007179914,0.005234653,0.000046043864,0.0019336112,0.00031532915,0.00042598715,0.00017601682],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000574792,0.00027926333,0.10112271,0.0009983673,0.0015007508,0.000036570877,0.0043346756,0.0014136046,0.000030695395,0.8538087,0.0015110419,0.03438884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009453773,0.00025709765,0.025851699,0.0004934969,0.0013043492,0.000004778845,0.10522289,0.060751643,0.00007798076,0.0016569615,0.79413104,0.00079430855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002243182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000269058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85215175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000896859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033717377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7623392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082283342","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2020-0416","title":"Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the role of narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and competitiveness","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Machiavellianism; Psychopathy; Dark triad; Narcissism; Psychology; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Emotional intelligence; Originality; Creativity","score_opus":0.04518674989956612,"score_gpt":0.3399804737385538,"score_spread":0.29479372383898766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082283342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.736548,0.022199802,0.0006248046,0.0008914058,0.0020672963,0.0009089657,0.00010081441,0.000028948558,0.23662998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970964,0.00036475447,0.00032985132,0.0002117111,0.00057099585,0.000033078264,0.0000062494996,0.00005234401,0.0013345715],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970439,0.0005553356,0.00115395,0.0005299783,0.00030453107,0.0004123196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975991,0.00016221471,0.0008563691,0.00053542,0.00054605294,0.00030083963],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012482884,0.00038317518,0.0008466318,0.00027791064,0.0001361779,0.00003367893,0.0009319282,0.00015287788,0.00084050954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002394043,0.0002914408,0.0003054531,0.00047961052,0.0005326555,0.00020708956,0.00022243088,0.0004962058,0.00008491915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039094086,0.0126177715,0.034524884,0.0010130189,0.0023399964,0.00020026256,0.2847719,0.0000027608735,0.0057888874,0.1973849,0.004846858,0.45259938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00703214,0.005686581,0.4031318,0.0005918221,0.0014920717,0.00047319575,0.06853577,0.00016023335,0.0013094527,0.0055061043,0.5052058,0.0008750024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000015930276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000058234193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50035894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006344876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008283741,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084887014","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2020-0319","title":"Open innovation for sustainability through creating shared value-role of knowledge management system, openness and organizational structure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Knowledge management; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Open innovation; Value (mathematics); Business; Sustainability; Knowledge sharing; Creating shared value; Context (archaeology); Organizational learning; Computer science; Public relations; Corporate social responsibility; Psychology","score_opus":0.015399999020104638,"score_gpt":0.25795290033960866,"score_spread":0.24255290131950402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084887014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80436206,0.0020533688,0.033549327,0.0053919023,0.0014792447,0.013463206,0.000091280504,0.0001893197,0.13942029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914581,0.000014700665,0.007128638,0.00027905303,0.0006745222,0.00005849385,0.00006377123,0.00006372873,0.00025896513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99731576,0.00005886401,0.0013420671,0.0005084918,0.0004157414,0.00035908332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965145,0.000089094996,0.0012900837,0.00033328697,0.0017349354,0.000038116104],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011069259,0.00036175057,0.0006614382,0.00037715462,0.00034281448,0.0004595528,0.0011626245,0.00009797697,0.00009440145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036055673,0.00033642442,0.0001055063,0.0018675736,0.0001328087,0.0020843497,0.002685036,0.00017548742,0.000008311768],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055123586,0.0007289639,0.032105114,0.025110137,0.0005635992,0.00002183455,0.0020397848,0.0010584538,0.00033396893,0.9224437,0.0021293468,0.012913889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.022407712,0.0006552297,0.2932091,0.0032839335,0.003678589,0.000049228307,0.17332196,0.024244009,0.0018841602,0.19546846,0.27884927,0.002948348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002333199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000007696559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7269752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006064267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007006965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093779846","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2020-0392","title":"Knowledge management in health care: an integrative and result-driven clinical staff management model","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Health care; Business; Context (archaeology); Benchmarking; Originality; Construct (python library); Process management; Hospital accreditation; Accreditation; Qualitative research; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science; Marketing; Medical education; Political science","score_opus":0.06263240718515216,"score_gpt":0.3552001130652605,"score_spread":0.29256770588010833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093779846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034245547,0.01170725,0.030974107,0.0036692023,0.0022429358,0.002987169,0.000014080051,0.0002187519,0.91394097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786698,0.0050814333,0.010360525,0.0018266689,0.0017214423,0.00005354169,0.000021148222,0.00010052159,0.0021649103],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954744,0.00018810453,0.0022324878,0.0008881447,0.00052038487,0.0006964555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976582,0.00008372994,0.0009972259,0.00048097584,0.0005607444,0.00021913549],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016253553,0.00059336744,0.001012859,0.0011364026,0.00023079447,0.00033747157,0.0011459287,0.00010857636,0.000058363064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057870446,0.0005220468,0.0003225434,0.0012959783,0.00018912059,0.0011790064,0.0014972399,0.000692411,0.00028288472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009959437,0.0026731521,0.0022810441,0.0047378154,0.00089188264,0.00070110033,0.008144041,0.001115243,0.0000068527324,0.34144664,0.025438515,0.6115678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007823273,0.0011944363,0.0076420135,0.0028743153,0.0007440381,0.000013354118,0.06851605,0.09628228,0.000023012464,0.004936213,0.80846345,0.001487576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001195018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003265895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9444243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033880852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007476403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117477803","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2020-0571","title":"Two-decade bibliometric overview of publications in the <i>Journal of Knowledge Management</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Organizational and Employee Performance","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Body of knowledge; Subject (documents); Domain knowledge; Data science; Computer science; Library science; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.06603799575204125,"score_gpt":0.3138100271818713,"score_spread":0.24777203142983004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117477803","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068211384,0.09885517,0.4049909,0.034693394,0.00411233,0.0018917809,0.000014119037,0.00010875677,0.38712215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790323,0.007615639,0.011949887,0.0005986812,0.00034872818,0.0000036048116,8.8553827e-7,0.000015707792,0.00043457773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975376,0.00019915457,0.0011914856,0.00015198598,0.00068532577,0.00023443777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976843,0.0001564421,0.0009144285,0.00034291515,0.00076589285,0.00013604075],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020084137,0.00016813223,0.0003677265,0.008570211,0.00007686636,0.000111339185,0.0028261314,0.000032262225,0.000030246127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008317225,0.00011395129,0.00016957406,0.04113668,0.00004775103,0.0009523069,0.00060844806,0.0002842506,0.000055627377],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012103422,0.0043204846,0.027940797,0.0032903794,0.0011235692,0.00016989656,0.013621683,0.0017111654,0.0002815847,0.42164022,0.24058624,0.28519294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006982278,0.0015537785,0.31514996,0.0011314419,0.0006143306,0.00037156994,0.0024405743,0.007041666,0.0012299049,0.005014103,0.6577463,0.0007240522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":9.328504e-7,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000028757327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9108209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007626563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010246928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9792444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119509660","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0683","title":"Team reflexivity and employee innovative behavior: the mediating role of knowledge sharing and moderating role of leadership","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Originality; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Multilevel model; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Creativity","score_opus":0.08035040993085969,"score_gpt":0.34965325509774814,"score_spread":0.26930284516688846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119509660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7153326,0.012541588,0.00012254331,0.0002684389,0.00028562557,0.00037116717,0.0000025523013,0.000020310188,0.27105513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966634,0.0004714402,0.00087217015,0.000022312874,0.0002851966,0.000012113706,0.0000013035404,0.000019842146,0.0016522363],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.997761,0.00030982462,0.00083923066,0.00027779368,0.0004317966,0.0003803533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785405,0.00026279176,0.00067688985,0.00023247414,0.00083608937,0.00013767822],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034123552,0.00019488929,0.00046752393,0.0003041178,0.0004713934,0.0001299678,0.00044591678,0.00008283821,0.000024880435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057755486,0.00016308375,0.00010696825,0.0008485937,0.00032074278,0.00039014994,0.0008150278,0.00034611378,0.000002302396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060670052,0.00065207307,0.37983546,0.0008089306,0.00066499226,0.000024273726,0.17885838,0.000023782502,0.004573492,0.11528107,0.0005275156,0.31868938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031874874,0.0004666596,0.15833233,0.002016142,0.0013342125,0.000021303907,0.7732209,0.003942195,0.013300374,0.015821677,0.027368937,0.0009877566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003576138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00078361336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59436256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116316485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001405174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66503626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126507733","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0721","title":"Knowledge assets, capabilities and performance measurement systems: a resource orchestration theory approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Orchestration; Structural equation modeling; Computer science; Originality; Resource (disambiguation); Bridge (graph theory); Control (management); Business; Process management; Psychology","score_opus":0.0341845846978993,"score_gpt":0.223035292122703,"score_spread":0.1888507074248037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126507733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34512085,0.020838642,0.0030388841,0.00017634296,0.0007562191,0.00035147255,0.000001157487,0.00005229264,0.6296641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99317896,0.00043324003,0.0002105232,0.000109277746,0.0012197056,0.00001896758,0.0000085113925,0.000024212417,0.0047966205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981212,0.00009170594,0.00069969124,0.00026682776,0.0005221472,0.00029842614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99809027,0.00005702263,0.00040115495,0.00025642104,0.0011610949,0.00003406186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028624246,0.00025188315,0.00041624802,0.0005197418,0.00026485175,0.0004242867,0.00026761755,0.00006926166,0.00007830627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012759943,0.00020286215,0.0001709533,0.00066651544,0.00008636837,0.00096321467,0.00025168038,0.00025166632,0.00010616364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015805651,0.0048314864,0.021972584,0.03661713,0.0048366375,0.00022238033,0.012041782,0.002996604,0.00072210137,0.5387794,0.10275952,0.27263984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028603205,0.0003485651,0.022298919,0.0018342516,0.0023457184,0.00022580528,0.044601288,0.046249762,0.0004563113,0.0033959774,0.87405497,0.0013280935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005722573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014873371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7712955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016998677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007104735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82724786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126640707","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0730","title":"A structured literature review of scientometric research of the knowledge management discipline: a 2021 update","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Scientometrics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Publishing; Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.032947950929448855,"score_gpt":0.33105548665496753,"score_spread":0.2981075357255187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126640707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048408985,0.40222666,0.00023508904,0.0026925611,0.002977792,0.0011700718,0.000017115457,0.000017212888,0.5422545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8882538,0.092886835,0.0006141373,0.0005067226,0.0014265978,0.000020863698,0.00002735198,0.000043465454,0.016220191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966415,0.00013644098,0.0012267487,0.00032539657,0.0012458123,0.00042410195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994492,0.000077529025,0.0008910288,0.00070682087,0.003795825,0.000036816742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032745223,0.00025941242,0.0006737301,0.002719024,0.00025211283,0.00019930235,0.0012479697,0.00006718521,0.0008618136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002918126,0.00016430685,0.0006545621,0.017032549,0.00018092016,0.00061971426,0.0018990505,0.00049566315,0.00013623995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040703654,0.0033911031,0.0039739097,0.17701657,0.003970292,0.0004842989,0.002290731,0.00012111017,0.00077896455,0.17270373,0.35569832,0.27916393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021286325,0.00012793975,0.015239907,0.051753912,0.0022804302,0.000050943054,0.0035092093,0.00095709163,0.0016836668,0.005778296,0.91585946,0.0006305032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000020187933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025064788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8398448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001150591,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007995875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94362545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131415998","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2020-0323","title":"Knowledge sharing as a give-and-take practice: the role of the knowledge receiver in the knowledge-sharing process","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Openness to experience; Knowledge management; Knowledge value chain; Business; Unit (ring theory); Originality; Knowledge economy; Process (computing); Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Personal knowledge management; Organizational learning; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03269904870615884,"score_gpt":0.3449813144883399,"score_spread":0.31228226578218105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131415998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060193017,0.03718798,0.000054623615,0.0026054517,0.0016385113,0.0011422981,0.0000020655177,0.00004001292,0.89713603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96860176,0.0025903538,0.00012895226,0.00014289409,0.0010585872,0.000080484715,0.0000015586205,0.00005696177,0.027338458],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99456036,0.0014162913,0.0014634895,0.0007122555,0.0009425642,0.00090505445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949615,0.001146967,0.0010986772,0.0010388383,0.0015472068,0.0002068349],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00912067,0.00049318594,0.00072209805,0.00054210617,0.0014399065,0.0006112216,0.0036706005,0.00019792639,0.00018539513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017851249,0.00030585992,0.00048745156,0.0031923484,0.00056971004,0.0009520514,0.0021786196,0.0012240146,0.0001664391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022020793,0.003672646,0.021305956,0.0012449966,0.0013746587,0.00016957741,0.4613918,0.0000928026,0.00010272339,0.35371697,0.004860093,0.15184756],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015936325,0.00011136565,0.011264509,0.0014381909,0.00086035894,0.000058005553,0.2078064,0.0010476942,0.00020817625,0.013510576,0.7616016,0.0004994539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006993423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035500834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9084087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045320284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005788064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138884011","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2019-0611","title":"Frogs in boiling water: a moderated-mediation model of exploitative leadership, fear of negative evaluation and knowledge hiding behaviors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Moderated mediation; Originality; Mediation; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Creativity","score_opus":0.12570617495680705,"score_gpt":0.36332307381983764,"score_spread":0.23761689886303058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138884011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94031334,0.0029367178,0.0030432043,0.00024695985,0.00043646383,0.0005582548,0.0000023912582,0.000012966759,0.052449707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958335,0.00058448984,0.0020667207,0.0000070201113,0.00009642889,0.000017928487,0.0000043116142,0.000016199507,0.0013733911],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974282,0.00059540867,0.0008568982,0.00023774344,0.0005732538,0.00030854042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792135,0.00016145252,0.00045263334,0.00012833027,0.0012449395,0.0000913043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003914388,0.00016385346,0.00044104003,0.0006804622,0.00015394815,0.000056389516,0.00022479211,0.00008628672,0.000046152596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033840456,0.00015203316,0.00012415503,0.0005695156,0.00014468822,0.0005936279,0.00020702896,0.00020892314,0.0000049598507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026114902,0.0016875481,0.00904458,0.0012983227,0.0006290162,0.000032853084,0.83217794,0.014066689,0.00871226,0.024200553,0.0004018732,0.1074872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007785497,0.00033654633,0.0044937558,0.002563153,0.0012949526,0.0000023461819,0.57528204,0.3411781,0.040906508,0.024921237,0.00047709685,0.0007587593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000027866547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000793057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3271114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003612441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022520004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61997324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176073091","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2020-0530","title":"The influence mechanism of rewards on knowledge sharing behaviors in virtual communities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Tacit knowledge; Virtual community; Explicit knowledge; Virtual organization; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Originality; Computer science; Psychology; The Internet; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Creativity","score_opus":0.033775663677179886,"score_gpt":0.32565138325033083,"score_spread":0.29187571957315095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176073091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5831044,0.001655692,0.00015648761,0.00032860422,0.0014333015,0.00027952422,0.0000012736393,0.000023228571,0.4130175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835844,0.0018787136,0.00010298803,0.00003086636,0.0001798201,0.000013189419,8.976091e-7,0.000018873467,0.014190258],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749255,0.00047654906,0.0008756162,0.0001732144,0.0005563644,0.00042568246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980804,0.00037524992,0.00041665457,0.00043645667,0.0005820204,0.00010921884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003820296,0.0001882316,0.00037049694,0.0004679376,0.0006143129,0.00018327037,0.0012928328,0.000080439866,0.00006879142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017263864,0.00015686359,0.0002083574,0.0008681602,0.00024037783,0.00030583737,0.00080305943,0.0004475244,0.00004155952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007114155,0.00078745745,0.005952285,0.00012883625,0.00021270911,0.00012453715,0.051095244,0.00023863582,0.000078853045,0.90153223,0.00095039874,0.038827658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050146915,0.001061701,0.048033226,0.0050979583,0.00069338543,0.000014719326,0.5395461,0.0010064493,0.0021488473,0.03437265,0.36174384,0.0012664446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007211866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005339933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8671596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035280152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001628197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6396712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191634878","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2020-0774","title":"Individual knowledge measurement: organizational knowledge measured at the individual level","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Respondent; Knowledge management; Investment (military); Body of knowledge; Knowledge sharing; Organizational learning; Knowledge value chain; Originality; Production (economics); Business; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Creativity; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.08811359055949279,"score_gpt":0.2498141944039675,"score_spread":0.1617006038444747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191634878","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13023834,0.046077367,0.0021728775,0.0031231372,0.006732454,0.00085475907,0.00004901493,0.00015912623,0.81059295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97976166,0.000275778,0.00016716136,0.0008185554,0.0038009405,0.000017857441,0.000084504536,0.00007217545,0.015001377],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961794,0.00012976976,0.0011485156,0.0004240482,0.0015391989,0.0005790449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994509,0.000113954266,0.0007504776,0.0004724739,0.0040874165,0.00006667894],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003445539,0.00046251228,0.0005877354,0.0008388993,0.0008625697,0.00062718336,0.0012141947,0.00013245364,0.002895199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044772707,0.00033373607,0.0005083503,0.0026242763,0.00017061373,0.00095284247,0.0016039006,0.0004900596,0.0032799128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032670208,0.0035844687,0.012085462,0.0016002577,0.0069711013,0.00023114202,0.0072531607,0.0002443122,0.0009022295,0.045884423,0.83175385,0.089162916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028356905,0.00008588654,0.03756872,0.00043786864,0.0030765673,0.0001152606,0.0036660188,0.0006066754,0.0020038176,0.0027597346,0.94595903,0.0008847131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000063179914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007079428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8495233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039110883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002965402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196041735","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0722","title":"Leader knowledge hiding and employee organizational identification in the Egyptian service industry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Bootstrapping (finance); Mediation; Moderated mediation; Moderation; Psychology; Agreeableness; Social psychology; Organizational identification; Tertiary sector of the economy; Originality; Knowledge management; Personality; Marketing; Business; Organizational commitment; Big Five personality traits; Creativity; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04718398265434265,"score_gpt":0.32845649400001153,"score_spread":0.2812725113456689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196041735","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3860247,0.005845197,0.0009250554,0.013137244,0.0019554587,0.00055803865,0.0000016516514,0.000046822333,0.5915058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98884135,0.00042448536,0.0002274289,0.00028097155,0.00066030794,0.000007472758,0.0000034732248,0.000016134652,0.009538382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981471,0.00043765907,0.00053924945,0.00021089725,0.0003937581,0.00027139176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987913,0.00014459544,0.00022186767,0.00018915342,0.0005662849,0.00008684893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025114054,0.00013260475,0.00019285713,0.00033811058,0.00041641778,0.0003392503,0.0005310665,0.00011950322,0.00017360448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020192124,0.00011412165,0.000059264203,0.0016450735,0.000074568,0.0004085909,0.00025079885,0.00041822885,0.00008429841],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039533294,0.0015137302,0.22891909,0.00090822217,0.00060885417,0.0004303777,0.2528169,0.000074527765,0.00034153808,0.41586185,0.036441877,0.062043544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001968357,0.00004825551,0.3049783,0.0006649875,0.00040862014,0.000039317463,0.20701694,0.0003218013,0.00022108974,0.0073998594,0.47637656,0.0005558723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009987493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014855613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60281664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018268617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014894492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4653746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209197933","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2021-0231","title":"Perceived organizational politics, knowledge hiding and diminished promotability: how do harmony motives matter?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Politics; Compromise; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Dysfunctional family; Originality; Phenomenon; Public relations; Extant taxon; Social psychology; Business; Marketing; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.015121250649451952,"score_gpt":0.23765654175688952,"score_spread":0.22253529110743758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209197933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.929496,0.0021260113,0.00146263,0.009538941,0.0021059178,0.0004630522,0.000008419962,0.00009048436,0.054708567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99206626,0.00007827645,0.0010077661,0.0004673373,0.0011093025,0.0000044784106,0.000018484528,0.000050048595,0.005198071],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985457,0.000049954597,0.00049529964,0.00031412067,0.00032708867,0.0002678408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979479,0.000059685026,0.00031894475,0.00019209062,0.0014231381,0.000058273727],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034609015,0.0002432697,0.00033803296,0.00042536648,0.00028375484,0.0006617669,0.00021227826,0.00006630447,0.0015319303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002000034,0.00022769473,0.000106466134,0.0006832334,0.000081980266,0.0009703513,0.0004063389,0.00019085943,0.00027073882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029214863,0.0012007242,0.8580377,0.0012164256,0.00038210675,0.00017052211,0.0017237368,0.0000065894274,0.0022875573,0.09889966,0.029373564,0.006672193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014025915,0.000019544479,0.9271533,0.0002011723,0.00036995634,0.00007505219,0.0044423216,0.00011836244,0.0002719173,0.0024807898,0.0631218,0.00034322598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000017250776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009933968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09641887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001458146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007956925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993808},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200007548","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2021-0069","title":"How does organizational learning contribute to corporate social responsibility and innovation performance? The dynamic capability view","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Knowledge management; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Originality; Structural equation modeling; Bridge (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Dynamic capabilities; Business; Test (biology); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Organizational performance; Social responsibility; Computer science; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.023737270398915565,"score_gpt":0.26129360683720254,"score_spread":0.23755633643828697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200007548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98596174,0.00015763736,0.0012358407,0.009030662,0.00055507646,0.00038769748,0.0000015975136,0.000033203152,0.0026365777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960248,0.000030707793,0.00028424783,0.0004062544,0.00058434915,0.0000073174997,0.0000127607345,0.000021391288,0.0026281746],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979257,0.00017069229,0.0008623632,0.00030679166,0.0004774004,0.00025705132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946237,0.0001532452,0.0015761642,0.00021037599,0.0034132851,0.000023230454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049267686,0.00019223192,0.00036515773,0.00040092002,0.00065430644,0.0006205493,0.00021799786,0.000062384,0.00004646925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033810786,0.00013447781,0.00008930114,0.0031323654,0.00011237986,0.00070509233,0.0005447698,0.00034322834,0.000015883259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012533744,0.00077114033,0.5136813,0.0030737082,0.0006778118,0.00027555783,0.0022400473,0.00019418994,0.007376732,0.1407463,0.0016244968,0.32808536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016165753,0.00007478317,0.8314265,0.00026573142,0.00040986735,0.00004033011,0.006564179,0.00273187,0.00039136986,0.03944975,0.116468646,0.00056039373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000024728718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009571085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32752496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026646123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001942336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59839714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225011412","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2021-0601","title":"Green talent management and employees’ innovative work behavior: the roles of artificial intelligence and transformational leadership","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Business and Economic Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Oxford Instruments (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Competitive advantage; Knowledge management; Structural equation modeling; Originality; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Work behavior; Business; Sustainability; Emotional intelligence; Psychology; Marketing; Creativity; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05401954798763566,"score_gpt":0.2399478940805622,"score_spread":0.18592834609292652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225011412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787128,0.0007408781,0.00409522,0.0019561877,0.00039128045,0.0006181987,0.0000064282804,0.000007325316,0.01347171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99805254,0.00013557327,0.0010411207,0.00008919424,0.000021338652,0.000036975518,0.0000013930467,0.000006874659,0.00061498035],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893314,0.000041163985,0.0004959632,0.00012594678,0.00025744468,0.00014632182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959236,0.000022518107,0.00023226374,0.00009266887,0.000019758176,0.000040427254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074535754,0.00010554827,0.00014691634,0.00011967719,0.0001948032,0.000025082807,0.00025337038,0.000013209951,0.0004622691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000017505711,0.000080970494,0.00003442167,0.00036360227,0.00016743592,0.00014371662,0.0004639275,0.00013208688,0.000009663289],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011824023,0.00045183537,0.019757157,0.000099931094,0.00016635933,0.000025102114,0.008677502,0.0012801364,0.000016081634,0.0077389083,0.0012472256,0.9604215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000718266,0.00041743674,0.8638072,0.0001447722,0.00025720565,0.00008043223,0.053234033,0.0005214917,0.00023960658,0.0046853516,0.07542386,0.0004703622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000039410907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000023792627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95995116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014210913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000069576104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5061522},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249464209","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2016-0490","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2017 update","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Journal ranking; Originality; Impact factor; Computer science; Business; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Information retrieval; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.034241585033589365,"score_gpt":0.297022467744272,"score_spread":0.2627808827106826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249464209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53295374,0.02005706,0.0018229524,0.0005128719,0.0023329465,0.0004412051,0.0000063485263,0.000038299702,0.44183457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877442,0.0077207326,0.0003316752,0.00016986417,0.0016854753,0.0000067017363,0.000003848011,0.000031316762,0.0023061635],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713033,0.000037479458,0.0013158572,0.00036395513,0.00060574,0.00054665963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669975,0.0000639573,0.001890474,0.00055977463,0.00071107765,0.00007496687],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001892599,0.0004305496,0.00080024137,0.0011185303,0.0007525501,0.00061034405,0.0015970131,0.00013934825,0.00040575315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002053008,0.00035584313,0.00043975323,0.00052372727,0.00029598773,0.0022017981,0.0016246744,0.00047461147,0.0004563024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017372479,0.0014539097,0.06448122,0.00584221,0.006450497,0.0006643164,0.004696244,0.00020448928,0.00012945871,0.13185723,0.24127194,0.54121125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010443522,0.00051029713,0.17852236,0.005252644,0.006748746,0.00036435417,0.015165366,0.010357927,0.00031518703,0.032362588,0.73740643,0.0025505594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020488465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006447402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53866065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014479019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032057436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252598960","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2020-0814","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: a 2021 update","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Knowledge management; Journal ranking; Citation impact; Citation analysis; Impact factor; Intellectual capital; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Originality; Index (typography); Sociology; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Social science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.0203195703006584,"score_gpt":0.26762982175652134,"score_spread":0.24731025145586294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252598960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5744736,0.07299668,0.004247681,0.00064851914,0.0023002296,0.00040368576,0.000008142854,0.00003886217,0.3448826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9819538,0.012657621,0.0006175912,0.000320467,0.0016374663,0.000007043475,0.000010050829,0.000033883214,0.002762065],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693805,0.00006705922,0.0014421142,0.00039315474,0.000630776,0.00052886765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975206,0.00009548285,0.0009061578,0.00031185214,0.0010933488,0.00007253829],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001425021,0.00040817715,0.0008042551,0.0010996797,0.00024409978,0.0002813508,0.0006498612,0.00013210943,0.0014939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016099113,0.00035514348,0.00047923543,0.0023471506,0.00014233394,0.0011947413,0.0011631479,0.0004816661,0.0004347512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011959973,0.0021776217,0.025529647,0.0065194457,0.00774412,0.0015871848,0.0056017437,0.000460307,0.00036329453,0.13240187,0.15821923,0.65819955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008179118,0.00034091694,0.026665725,0.0046289074,0.006501261,0.0006352132,0.03447756,0.008619033,0.00095045683,0.022661978,0.88421154,0.0021283166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000006968837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005317592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72599226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017213698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006142756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282826187","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2021-0920","title":"The Great Resignation: the great knowledge exodus or the onset of the Great Knowledge Revolution?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Knowledge value chain; Knowledge economy; Personal knowledge management; Human capital; Competitive advantage; Knowledge worker; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04600786100243058,"score_gpt":0.3153302455460807,"score_spread":0.2693223845436501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282826187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013375463,0.028977437,0.00035535332,0.024742143,0.012182793,0.003783872,0.00002772655,0.0001222208,0.916433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61125916,0.002297342,0.000052779655,0.00015720226,0.0016109922,0.00019951715,0.0000027065748,0.000055061548,0.38436523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923924,0.0033755254,0.0014028144,0.00046478832,0.0014976969,0.0008667543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947266,0.0016404497,0.0012128288,0.0013447492,0.0009007839,0.00017459187],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010687648,0.0004517881,0.00055323367,0.00038353875,0.008430726,0.00039957726,0.0050704954,0.00010230274,0.001056973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006717811,0.00019383991,0.00074642646,0.0029069756,0.0011361775,0.00036635212,0.0028587289,0.0010422695,0.00014865636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050282996,0.000732097,0.004171869,0.00023090109,0.0013323829,0.00006246113,0.04445526,0.00017857083,0.000008747638,0.15204819,0.6692687,0.12700796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010382311,0.00020892409,0.007969675,0.00019352305,0.0006406332,0.000030544063,0.02082818,0.00038904996,0.00002218673,0.0034020194,0.96498466,0.00029239547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007138849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050477763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5978837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011788679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057225255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288084171","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2021-0622","title":"Knowledge sharing processes and the role of attachment patterns","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; University of Alberta; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Equifinality; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Underpinning; Social psychology; Action (physics); Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.023060267449535207,"score_gpt":0.30379217364456396,"score_spread":0.28073190619502875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288084171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09270929,0.024948018,0.00046300504,0.0008145743,0.0012277459,0.0009426026,0.0000045779966,0.00003950811,0.8788507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901296,0.0011950525,0.000084221516,0.000028042938,0.00030950265,0.00004711827,8.6293346e-7,0.000016301241,0.008189315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798954,0.00032706384,0.00061930344,0.00020709047,0.0005447546,0.00031223817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987445,0.00020006859,0.0005070666,0.00021528886,0.00023452239,0.000098547316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038951614,0.00015296643,0.00034993564,0.000357925,0.00087473966,0.000108266846,0.0010113973,0.000024565134,0.00024399642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000904432,0.00011712042,0.00015061785,0.0006314557,0.00021410285,0.00021243902,0.0014644815,0.00026218354,0.000008478545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038657567,0.0012403572,0.08550711,0.0011971414,0.0011289382,0.000039290764,0.15163493,0.0000984874,0.000017407108,0.5683439,0.003313888,0.18709199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032973744,0.00019490003,0.0039085597,0.00025256473,0.00049884216,0.000008065794,0.1268617,0.0004951299,0.00007450034,0.012072624,0.85203326,0.0003024938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000040220402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030138402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8974203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019844157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091864196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6727879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292298019","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2022-0029","title":"Antecedents and consequences of knowledge sabotage in the Turkish telecommunication and retail sectors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge worker; Organizational justice; Business; Interactional justice; Incivility; Structural equation modeling; Originality; Psychology; Turkish; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Public relations; Organizational commitment; Political science","score_opus":0.040356204109439714,"score_gpt":0.3146672408366291,"score_spread":0.2743110367271894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292298019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7225825,0.010955713,0.000029619727,0.000953195,0.00046043043,0.000474689,0.0000020663936,0.0000115765115,0.2645302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99469966,0.0026820851,0.0001422961,0.000037508944,0.000078634956,0.000017480717,9.0531483e-7,0.000008060877,0.0023333821],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978833,0.00085143815,0.00052306376,0.00015269304,0.00036990838,0.0002195826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999005,0.0002506545,0.0003756853,0.00020303727,0.00010865738,0.00005692913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004576064,0.00011742936,0.00025749305,0.00042686937,0.0005509736,0.00008940374,0.00080925983,0.00003063726,0.00009821437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009967531,0.0000959882,0.000067952904,0.00068651635,0.00034610074,0.00021929822,0.0006073458,0.00030483922,0.0000025229203],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021860492,0.0019152914,0.21109284,0.0008772921,0.0006566538,0.00017012081,0.32416347,0.000050050818,0.00044700294,0.17937016,0.010585814,0.2704527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002682353,0.00053353584,0.14921245,0.0003838175,0.00034726,0.000040320694,0.26468274,0.00028919172,0.000092782575,0.0064000264,0.57485,0.00048547133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000665827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010882124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56426424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014105978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005592762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4237699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316672444","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2021-0796","title":"Personality disorders as a predictor of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the application of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-IV","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Personality disorders; Psychology; Personality; Originality; Context (archaeology); Sadistic personality disorder; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.0505103819311926,"score_gpt":0.40762189108478064,"score_spread":0.357111509153588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316672444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95123523,0.0012968654,0.0002990694,0.0018373068,0.0048954403,0.0010108736,0.000050449467,0.000021463013,0.039353322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99606484,0.00015771286,0.000036770212,0.00010873893,0.000611654,0.000072716044,0.0000047560984,0.000022449902,0.002920331],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970543,0.00080943335,0.0011505123,0.00033170776,0.0003805502,0.00027349696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99771816,0.00024210749,0.0009832268,0.0006457353,0.00032389112,0.00008685578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002985284,0.0001936325,0.00045048702,0.0001816434,0.00011588759,0.000009855009,0.0009294492,0.00014107041,0.00018769017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097076314,0.00011854723,0.0005686128,0.0006211227,0.0006578201,0.000059822843,0.00020869638,0.00045743425,0.0001081928],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021666582,0.010780346,0.5474628,0.00055156683,0.0033036761,0.000019514582,0.06184143,0.000017913902,0.000334173,0.042035915,0.13872498,0.19276102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018927741,0.00043158824,0.8307841,0.000071681,0.00042586276,0.000014826508,0.004021507,0.00010679861,0.000011059803,0.000872091,0.1612502,0.000117520045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006379473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021327984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2833213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074193806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000078331665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48342156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321787789","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2022-0277","title":"Knowledge assets, innovation ambidexterity and firm performance in knowledge-intensive companies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambidexterity; Knowledge management; Business; Orchestration; Mediation; Originality; Resource (disambiguation); Value (mathematics); Structural equation modeling; Industrial organization; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.040623715732266294,"score_gpt":0.28427196430003704,"score_spread":0.24364824856777073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321787789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53587025,0.0010082948,0.00014264583,0.00085101085,0.002783792,0.00065715483,0.0000016869315,0.00017721923,0.45850793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99230504,0.00033934714,0.00017476913,0.00044386767,0.0010902525,0.000036355792,0.000026917209,0.00005518992,0.0055282707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970895,0.00005597411,0.001476512,0.00042835274,0.00036023348,0.0005894152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649286,0.00008476721,0.0007986495,0.000340456,0.002250596,0.000032682205],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026714492,0.00042299068,0.0006466306,0.004701074,0.0002717782,0.0003546653,0.0005541618,0.000112618254,0.00006044759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021745451,0.0003976799,0.00012014264,0.006419113,0.00013769962,0.0012590567,0.0010338789,0.00044436328,0.0012589471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032531665,0.0013469667,0.066102825,0.0053731548,0.00043436125,0.00021659257,0.0025374987,0.0000765261,0.00021354422,0.65782654,0.1037556,0.16179106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037741784,0.00012670908,0.34958574,0.0012077283,0.00017925854,0.000020199279,0.007071854,0.017419456,0.000061524726,0.004782237,0.61497957,0.00079155737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005881353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000121195575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65304434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023110963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052282794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362669242","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2022-0792","title":"The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting: recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; Burnout; Business; Public relations; Human resource management; Human capital; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.05273482374607948,"score_gpt":0.405537287506806,"score_spread":0.35280246376072655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362669242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11158654,0.00079560146,0.00030308837,0.100795396,0.0036265478,0.0025617313,0.00004052306,0.00024559497,0.780045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9189163,0.0013524503,0.0009340982,0.00024372348,0.0010002346,0.00011671583,0.0000098433065,0.000036306916,0.07739035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984856,0.00014674796,0.00035114906,0.0001940352,0.00047417014,0.0003483007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988743,0.00034360145,0.00024048948,0.000121672936,0.00030558175,0.00011435767],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024997178,0.0001291039,0.00014770609,0.00041122863,0.0018307662,0.00022214488,0.00033631307,0.000041515374,0.000016335198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009764858,0.000104904575,0.00014686395,0.00048108769,0.00016482189,0.000120654695,0.00012905883,0.00015184106,0.000036054156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025221652,0.00012736762,0.00021136658,0.000019793115,0.00020065301,0.000010146326,0.009391001,0.000010349927,0.0000012909234,0.7536249,0.218146,0.018231912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010732131,0.0002113904,0.0066810846,0.00014964602,0.00016347299,0.0000017780243,0.16965403,0.000009628158,0.0000046203127,0.027724266,0.7941364,0.00019043323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000058525013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00053509173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006234259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004988458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99946874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388509690","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2023-0013","title":"Is competence without humility wasted in building the trust necessary for knowledge transfer in younger/older worker dyads?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Psychology; Humility; Originality; Social psychology; Workforce; Thematic analysis; Knowledge transfer; Reflexivity; Social exchange theory; Phenomenon; Interdependence; Distrust; Qualitative research; Public relations; Sociology; Knowledge management; Political science; Epistemology; Creativity","score_opus":0.18510392030025435,"score_gpt":0.4316723844119766,"score_spread":0.24656846411172223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388509690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95306873,0.0013926629,0.0007662406,0.004192859,0.0016163246,0.0018082283,0.0000056366694,0.000044175147,0.037105113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960739,0.00072046154,0.00018838515,0.0001305002,0.00031740215,0.00010387098,0.0000014774924,0.000021981497,0.0024420046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702674,0.00050659035,0.0009379914,0.0003473496,0.0005332803,0.0006480359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988439,0.00035284142,0.00014418097,0.00030627308,0.00021406416,0.00013875593],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058795395,0.00022389376,0.00043971918,0.0004118561,0.00036205564,0.000116394454,0.00082530564,0.00009647385,0.00011023645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014575239,0.00016782526,0.00026375143,0.0014689552,0.00030161045,0.00036316048,0.0001484504,0.00031513302,0.00003507182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006856416,0.003268942,0.62974524,0.0014232973,0.0004574493,0.000060203038,0.22170873,0.0003180942,0.00018860845,0.036305573,0.01883006,0.087008186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049992846,0.00023851868,0.7784004,0.0014712595,0.00021498925,0.0000018990302,0.086869195,0.0020921396,0.00019005493,0.0093570845,0.11555243,0.0006127458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013357085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033258225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14865519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060346007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014096392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68437153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391963668","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2023-0713","title":"Practical wisdom in the workplace: conceptualization, instrument development, and predictive power","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Nomological network; Conceptualization; Knowledge management; Operationalization; Originality; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Salient; Computer science; Social psychology; Creativity; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04392570269415603,"score_gpt":0.3497701530641831,"score_spread":0.30584445037002705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391963668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035723392,0.0061018644,0.013052157,0.005584893,0.0022206344,0.0008508789,9.184612e-7,0.000050847175,0.9364144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916367,0.00059699925,0.0013473794,0.0001010882,0.0002629795,0.000017463555,0.0000011145354,0.000010911144,0.006025376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836963,0.00030036242,0.00044819404,0.0001726907,0.0004611959,0.0002479485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999374,0.00023397863,0.00011390632,0.000095766016,0.00010616395,0.00007621405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031044548,0.00012005315,0.00015757413,0.00034515015,0.00024699763,0.00034407096,0.00028253766,0.000050051793,0.000103309416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012908074,0.000085896245,0.00005099374,0.00066789123,0.00017278847,0.00046568617,0.00015614445,0.00024929378,0.00004506466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006161213,0.00031773624,0.0046010828,0.00018090504,0.00040438777,0.00034109963,0.24314094,0.0000140512275,9.567866e-7,0.6392303,0.056509394,0.055197548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040154814,0.000060382372,0.004209232,0.00035623813,0.00008615686,0.0000071183013,0.07416341,0.00021342539,0.0000047829617,0.0012909101,0.9190884,0.00011840324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002287639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012147758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9559133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022675928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015048198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3502747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397009542","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2023-0468","title":"Selection of a business school dean: a multi-criteria knowledge-based approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.058518731537647216,"score_gpt":0.3635759311807552,"score_spread":0.305057199643108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397009542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43515152,0.0117915645,0.18171027,0.00028921614,0.008681201,0.0014999311,0.0000067898186,0.00020049191,0.36066902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773607,0.00004656135,0.0074520484,0.00002487827,0.0006241815,0.000041035044,0.00001125374,0.000037146154,0.014402155],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982948,0.00019927727,0.0007547327,0.00023136975,0.0002731257,0.00024672868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891144,0.000052829186,0.000253548,0.00017023928,0.0005137673,0.000098192526],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015290832,0.00019944616,0.00031527103,0.0011064959,0.00007829065,0.000079878155,0.0002708245,0.000093632916,0.0016496315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030217481,0.00016860876,0.00015779583,0.0010292412,0.000044854965,0.00016836255,0.00005562785,0.00026337313,0.000509748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018740594,0.009024833,0.019737039,0.011216822,0.004503963,0.0001984672,0.03562866,0.0018262023,0.0024771548,0.011032759,0.27314228,0.6293377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0081638545,0.000732394,0.33636326,0.0024836236,0.0010442537,0.00014401754,0.0030534791,0.12659581,0.0007217838,0.00017883729,0.5196514,0.00086728955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000017553053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062910676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6284705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021206023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017745004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400013799","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2023-0563","title":"Knowledge management is no more a gray area in the tourism industry in India – a study on transformation leadership and executive communication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Becton Dickinson (Canada); University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Tourism; Knowledge management; Business; Gray (unit); Transformation (genetics); Hospitality management studies; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.052892097948277796,"score_gpt":0.2967732006937594,"score_spread":0.2438811027454816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400013799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07836579,0.0016304896,0.00009950422,0.0040058736,0.0008216495,0.002254795,0.0000017590596,0.000059281687,0.91276085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950675,0.0001678624,0.00006186618,0.0017710604,0.00034482087,0.00015262197,0.000009894115,0.000036352365,0.0023880326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743974,0.00015617792,0.0010974794,0.00036625125,0.0005338427,0.00040649914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885947,0.00010570251,0.00032562963,0.00044463377,0.00024054048,0.000024051758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033873224,0.00038210946,0.00039420865,0.0030155466,0.00017321258,0.0006274336,0.0007740128,0.00017954642,0.00004517274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027221746,0.00028852138,0.00012639932,0.0026090895,0.00008157473,0.000981242,0.00031297063,0.001335581,0.00023675691],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004929112,0.0064769676,0.010678325,0.005062411,0.0009206078,0.0010606342,0.07515041,0.000041300085,0.000006454407,0.71848714,0.08022836,0.10139446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007594771,0.0003886393,0.16109903,0.005039638,0.0006966753,0.000019705818,0.43533978,0.00622231,0.000012032762,0.0059866947,0.3765824,0.0010182962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009171989,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006526059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91670173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027681713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002207731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400584736","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2023-0711","title":"Technostress and disengagement from knowledge sharing: insights from pre-pandemic and mid-pandemic data sets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Technostress in Professional Settings","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Technostress; Pandemic; Knowledge management; Disengagement theory; Knowledge sharing; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Computer science; Business; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.05892012277804705,"score_gpt":0.38494633696242114,"score_spread":0.3260262141843741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400584736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8339703,0.14561546,0.00057965855,0.00037238386,0.004287044,0.0006000905,0.00024565798,0.00030591674,0.014023496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99189746,0.0020374153,0.0016138454,0.000060935265,0.00060979824,0.000033379005,0.00009203501,0.000076918586,0.0035782114],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970049,0.00018508377,0.0009952278,0.0010324144,0.00038378604,0.00039854398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974964,0.00065157603,0.00036770536,0.0011536554,0.00009122655,0.0002394378],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007734927,0.0004286965,0.0005481878,0.00062059175,0.00020304437,0.00021176862,0.0015477176,0.0002709255,0.00024163502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009164624,0.00034727892,0.0000908235,0.00037767872,0.00020703436,0.0004520931,0.0036854756,0.0011519542,0.00011307968],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003739958,0.0009410773,0.08645611,0.00072632,0.0032091811,0.0009876796,0.012941365,0.0000018997785,0.0011303176,0.010673458,0.074432336,0.8081263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057131005,0.0005040518,0.3499125,0.009288655,0.0025837077,0.00017490625,0.0098283095,0.00231272,0.00046747676,0.061113004,0.5565936,0.0015079613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000051434476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011164287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8066183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017791784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004504499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402067851","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2023-0602","title":"Impact of entrepreneurship on technological innovation in the digital age: a knowledge management perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Knowledge management; Entrepreneurship; Business; Innovation management; Computer science","score_opus":0.03315373062956209,"score_gpt":0.36454522224313624,"score_spread":0.3313914916135742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402067851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17739138,0.0006929273,0.00004547274,0.00066303555,0.00044954347,0.00033468497,0.0000030225576,0.000037714595,0.82038224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99663305,0.00022791034,0.000044333497,0.000015266944,0.00024193198,0.000013289752,0.0000011668308,0.000010418061,0.0028126454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981969,0.0002835283,0.0005385996,0.00019698245,0.00050582516,0.0002781391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988786,0.00050875836,0.00019182339,0.00015864077,0.00021431273,0.00004788582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028019769,0.00014867244,0.00023780589,0.0008845246,0.00009905931,0.00032805293,0.00056510384,0.00008065701,0.000021170843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007116233,0.00009671209,0.00023835438,0.0023624038,0.00029034793,0.00021348862,0.00011459118,0.0003455395,0.000042820604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006907395,0.000814185,0.0013725302,0.00008018249,0.0002070549,0.00029617897,0.021771524,0.000006083063,0.000002030213,0.7059925,0.0032485875,0.26614004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002127064,0.0021748987,0.12594667,0.0033669844,0.00034806642,0.00002120358,0.40606308,0.000050111106,0.000019727066,0.1614192,0.29770315,0.0007598506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008971602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029380784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81924164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068408984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009650086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39438045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410359793","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2023-0653","title":"It’s mine but you took it: knowledge theft as a barrier to organizational knowledge management efforts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research; Centre for Global Health Research; The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Business; Organizational learning; Computer science","score_opus":0.017249254207558625,"score_gpt":0.3190049481554359,"score_spread":0.30175569394787727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410359793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037976326,0.0030610312,0.0041613653,0.0059196004,0.0052627986,0.0016488147,0.0000065322465,0.00014037582,0.97600186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3782879,0.0011057839,0.0017678089,0.0012832871,0.0014624844,0.00009472522,0.000008531569,0.00007947512,0.61591],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947681,0.00049915473,0.001698881,0.0008342967,0.0010203616,0.0011792227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964107,0.00027715127,0.0005078679,0.0007610144,0.0013663305,0.00067688356],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040263296,0.00066811504,0.0008891914,0.0024485257,0.0012481298,0.0005492186,0.0022593008,0.00022701983,0.0018338052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040784042,0.0006453015,0.00051700044,0.0032977192,0.00028478593,0.0006008217,0.0019904573,0.00048263528,0.0025835994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018638575,0.0016059735,0.0018950528,0.0008243811,0.0018344211,0.00024097366,0.025829842,0.000054137272,0.00003514867,0.4105053,0.49471352,0.062274855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001911465,0.00016473015,0.0015577849,0.0010788578,0.0007605584,0.0000063188454,0.019997723,0.000108273765,0.00013245299,0.0032872162,0.9703525,0.00064213073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000023885259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011227429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47563896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012703941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000513977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413290168","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2025-0061","title":"Functional and dysfunctional personality dispositions as antecedents of practical wisdom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Dysfunctional family; Psychology; Personality; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.07210289298463288,"score_gpt":0.4063125034734886,"score_spread":0.33420961048885567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413290168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78676474,0.0014939641,0.004056978,0.0029671423,0.002354564,0.00017351013,0.000011084547,0.000010240255,0.2021678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9784238,0.00008324226,0.00035096053,0.000120762714,0.00015508634,0.0000057296625,0.0000039012953,0.0000035875928,0.020852927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910176,0.00009253626,0.00036296665,0.00013147053,0.00019863795,0.00011262633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993268,0.000113010814,0.00018805465,0.00009100219,0.00021985413,0.00006126938],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002798384,0.00009514823,0.00019058744,0.00015924856,0.000090094276,0.000024021976,0.00008187488,0.0000454748,0.0013867539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035964753,0.00007101576,0.00012388466,0.0001665257,0.000104360406,0.000103919745,0.00008330071,0.00015646458,0.000044923923],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010794514,0.0021709676,0.0440499,0.00025785292,0.0021208192,0.00006261337,0.0013726734,0.000004187241,0.00043415552,0.79142267,0.13841024,0.018614482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012281684,0.0002431305,0.9680128,0.00015101091,0.00030612713,0.000096395765,0.0028723055,0.000028786386,0.00002657475,0.00550785,0.02144921,0.00007766109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000011053725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008484581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9239629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048452133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003242578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414418793","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2024-1216","title":"Breaking the flow: how do workplace hazing and co-worker bullying disrupt employee knowledge sharing?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Counterproductive work behavior; Structural equation modeling; Moderation; Workplace bullying; Extant taxon; Association (psychology); Affect (linguistics); Knowledge sharing; Social exchange theory","score_opus":0.02156651984005254,"score_gpt":0.33943348088750824,"score_spread":0.3178669610474557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414418793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3602071,0.02102569,0.003755877,0.011251473,0.0050154184,0.0010711609,0.0000031837392,0.00015719012,0.5975129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438825,0.0005921841,0.0007031743,0.0000954546,0.0006024154,0.000017529712,5.09071e-7,0.000023359065,0.054082844],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807096,0.00028310512,0.00045509537,0.00030561967,0.0003814145,0.0005038216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986108,0.0004104411,0.0002882181,0.00031039663,0.00022423163,0.00015589841],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032870267,0.00023111567,0.00035130087,0.00036410583,0.001399317,0.00084750034,0.00076437957,0.00010848598,0.000050576393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017301823,0.0001734673,0.00019977601,0.0007954906,0.0002569761,0.00026941954,0.0004234245,0.000501584,0.000027490145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013150035,0.00039427742,0.30049565,0.00022426185,0.000541202,0.00012137685,0.041491143,0.000071049915,0.000027180231,0.03211122,0.09478152,0.5296096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014845803,0.000065086286,0.06399008,0.0028719692,0.00066012336,0.000016004826,0.038612414,0.00022366285,0.000031476557,0.0014687608,0.890119,0.00045681358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000029617517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004677474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7953375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033739302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012470945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415265742","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2025-0280","title":"Examining the interdependent role of digitalization and external search breadth in driving service innovation in SMEs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Service innovation; Generalizability theory; Service (business); Interdependence; Survey data collection; Innovation management; Dual (grammatical number); Limiting","score_opus":0.07160244969716438,"score_gpt":0.37759824638950934,"score_spread":0.30599579669234495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415265742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98220986,0.0003101138,0.009503622,0.0005401307,0.00014289256,0.00010735289,3.0459526e-7,0.000004673828,0.007181055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991342,0.000036824098,0.0003226627,0.000055469667,0.000010594374,0.0000020998668,2.4843368e-7,0.0000030581966,0.0004348373],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983534,0.0001637267,0.00090612203,0.00012902412,0.0003495068,0.00009818343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990028,0.00016074309,0.00031447253,0.00016878327,0.00034006353,0.00001312849],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003848223,0.000066626584,0.00016566634,0.0017388118,0.00003375822,0.00009015629,0.0004691426,0.00003794403,0.000013228278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020529165,0.000045393845,0.000020879032,0.0019782062,0.00003653133,0.0002553946,0.00038830403,0.0001876818,0.000003410459],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017761568,0.00010629603,0.73202574,0.000014325618,0.0000112074795,0.0000088910065,0.0018183084,0.00020578728,0.00035075226,0.007956483,0.000069213886,0.25741524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051889796,0.00003054281,0.9751326,0.00033206336,0.0000082711895,0.0000067220644,0.013428728,0.0019965803,0.00025896335,0.0075869965,0.00066136976,0.000038300634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007466003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00025150718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25737694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006997515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002524128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18511072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416457827","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2025-0745","title":"Knowledge self-enhancement and knowledge self-presentation in the workplace: conceptual foundations, measures, and impacts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Personal knowledge management; Personality; Cognition; Self-knowledge; Knowledge engineering; Knowledge value chain; Procedural knowledge; Domain knowledge","score_opus":0.03163710122533933,"score_gpt":0.3480773911757011,"score_spread":0.3164402899503618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416457827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09000563,0.03238472,0.0018313687,0.0024209132,0.0020563605,0.0018067464,0.0000013565144,0.0000950799,0.8693978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9803747,0.00827451,0.0008033824,0.00010182345,0.00042894558,0.000054633274,0.0000025884488,0.000016671096,0.009942748],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690014,0.00095974014,0.0008218869,0.00035034533,0.00045431504,0.000513549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998332,0.00053119415,0.00032696262,0.00026547263,0.00038632215,0.00015800378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053081946,0.000283065,0.00040552567,0.0008491048,0.00077945687,0.0004891479,0.0006674323,0.00011335868,0.00004357369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002125063,0.00023032866,0.000112599664,0.0013332727,0.00027459709,0.00060319464,0.00043499877,0.0003771466,0.000042568558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015230967,0.002621407,0.025420481,0.0008268703,0.0012253772,0.00005426479,0.2738607,0.000007560604,0.000028032164,0.4702147,0.06723673,0.1583516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003207532,0.00016783089,0.026163328,0.00071940874,0.00061445177,0.0000047774192,0.0779908,0.000538632,0.000028338043,0.0032038454,0.88697606,0.00038496772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003292573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020765155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89036906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052922894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003080313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93925303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115562573","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2025-0993","title":"Effects of knowledge management and financial attraction on new technology-based firm performance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Venture capital; Debt; Attraction; Social capital; Debt financing; Competitive advantage; Capital (architecture)","score_opus":0.00838577917685959,"score_gpt":0.22995731990683957,"score_spread":0.22157154072997998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115562573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7795675,0.008099819,0.0075734407,0.0018193496,0.0052559115,0.0014011463,0.000001077707,0.00014311326,0.19613864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99490786,0.00036930482,0.00081945636,0.00036515656,0.0005638187,0.000014406859,0.0000020942819,0.000017954912,0.0029399726],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864465,0.000013811985,0.0005642633,0.00025532348,0.0002366042,0.0002853531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990087,0.00005333836,0.00047973616,0.00024090587,0.00019018675,0.000027116139],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045269975,0.00026153118,0.00040190452,0.0017893735,0.00016042976,0.00007877252,0.00044507798,0.00012303,0.000018053128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070971015,0.00023440004,0.00015988639,0.0010409313,0.000080324244,0.00046096946,0.00040426262,0.00030665833,0.00007593113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00079923053,0.002151157,0.007167226,0.013540721,0.00050788285,0.00013144505,0.00012209521,0.00012651178,0.0003312603,0.18858224,0.070583306,0.7159569],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0070123537,0.00040387336,0.13552074,0.004615667,0.0010718083,0.000004775118,0.00027103917,0.0010493275,0.0036428522,0.0057563274,0.84014964,0.00050160766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000015800344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005049853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7695663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011821074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004467218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9558556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116705671","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2025-0797","title":"Tune up! Knowledge integration in a fast-growing organization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Grounded theory; Data collection; Body of knowledge; Hospitality; Period (music); Focus group","score_opus":0.015507307240987705,"score_gpt":0.3407546016154748,"score_spread":0.3252472943744871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116705671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051804047,0.0005227393,0.098966315,0.0016641567,0.0055822465,0.00072078774,0.0000014011488,0.00004233783,0.840696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881903,0.00014789577,0.0003529762,0.00008566297,0.00019091368,0.000005833875,0.0000044572785,0.0000055209734,0.011016457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866736,0.00021059348,0.0006914014,0.00007253976,0.00019737017,0.00016072708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989464,0.000056506527,0.00029052337,0.00007778658,0.0005897003,0.00003907602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018808198,0.00008027573,0.00016104926,0.000640002,0.0002431154,0.00012002899,0.00020398537,0.000045990244,0.00010729879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016518295,0.00007433774,0.000050423154,0.0013421357,0.000035280613,0.0008977966,0.0000588116,0.00009989382,0.00004878692],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022373506,0.000097106065,0.0018719524,0.00010091387,0.000048730817,0.0000021341655,0.06865061,0.000025695188,0.00007753305,0.7069761,0.009500421,0.21262641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024792105,0.00008744638,0.010834433,0.0010074663,0.0000911656,0.00000255051,0.33665544,0.00035445706,0.0010435657,0.0053156745,0.64188963,0.00023897151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000031008884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042068204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9363862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005145334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014490838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3031405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117310848","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2024-1152","title":"The case of the shapeshifting iron ingot: translating knowledge through product design","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cultural and Communication Design Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Design knowledge; Product design; New product development; Product (mathematics); Domain knowledge; Strategic design; Knowledge engineering","score_opus":0.10725126789385983,"score_gpt":0.33095358170218475,"score_spread":0.22370231380832492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117310848","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019329876,0.026254516,0.0014005662,0.009057472,0.0012497548,0.0010442284,0.0000019159547,0.000026461317,0.9416352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95494115,0.00022561953,0.00029100743,0.000036350815,0.00022522277,0.000014870404,1.7058755e-7,0.000008255411,0.044257343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985364,0.00043271232,0.0005855486,0.00010436828,0.00015073683,0.00019023019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852186,0.00034935764,0.00029530216,0.00036131268,0.0004483518,0.00002380868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014748632,0.0001195287,0.00017760294,0.000080145444,0.0011034224,0.00018349268,0.00080617104,0.000017508379,0.00007393807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091845286,0.000058052723,0.00017785546,0.00020877097,0.00024543062,0.00015823336,0.00022023101,0.0003132916,0.000009836667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008065869,0.0003325457,0.000039531027,0.00044820976,0.00033737445,0.000031240354,0.10003882,0.00008426462,0.00017734694,0.4936883,0.02025673,0.38448498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010578351,0.00014842319,0.00019340745,0.0010426687,0.00029932105,0.00008308335,0.07155846,0.0017342125,0.0011414465,0.012770073,0.90974945,0.00022163133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020263831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004900946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9356113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006534461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006806906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8486744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}