{"meta":{"query_hash":"d912d284155d","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management"},"cohort_total":120,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":120,"exported":120,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d912d284155d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Knowledge+Management"},"results":[{"id":"W1499713345","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2014-0469","title":"Understanding “disengagement from knowledge sharing”: engagement theory versus adaptive cost theory","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":99,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Disengagement theory; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.355349396297244,"score_gpt":0.3756608377060894,"score_spread":0.020311441408845388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1499713345","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6957942,0.0034445259,0.1426485,0.018668512,0.00014018104,0.0002747685,0.0000764294,0.000057420668,0.13889548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948774,0.00037396417,0.0035953203,0.00030359073,0.000030506906,0.00009695572,0.000023479715,0.000007710117,0.00069110905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98967546,0.0060575632,0.00042866182,0.00095224037,0.0017339172,0.0011521603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553762,0.031960286,0.0055617113,0.0029901634,0.0021639655,0.0019476821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010156313,0.0005282643,0.0005516925,0.002612604,0.0018506717,0.007149169,0.0018153586,0.0022469629,0.0046439855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025084825,0.0003784003,0.00087549025,0.002098935,0.012334445,0.011978963,0.0056229206,0.002735165,0.0003172395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021818416,0.0007809057,0.06819386,0.0012987212,0.00021408268,0.00060008146,0.09201521,0.004568563,0.0009193048,0.7342935,0.0012974046,0.09560023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008187548,0.00036526562,0.056998733,0.0012522541,0.00013985427,0.0006068646,0.07056513,0.022625571,0.0007085101,0.8254694,0.021077095,0.00010949653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018940802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001357744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010156313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00419283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028216897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053712368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1932009746","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2014-0468","title":"Exploring collaboration technology use: how users’ perceptions twist and amend reality","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université TÉLUQ; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Perception; Originality; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Process (computing); Dynamics (music); Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.26319867052534235,"score_gpt":0.3638047988533117,"score_spread":0.10060612832796934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1932009746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9844817,0.0003154664,0.0075803692,0.0006073547,0.000021663282,0.000048696154,0.000025090072,0.000054037097,0.00686557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978619,0.00013865173,0.001563826,0.00008702192,0.0000068839845,0.000033589386,0.000015356196,0.000011217501,0.00028144976],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97788036,0.016438704,0.0008878729,0.0010579785,0.0028191567,0.000915922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9628357,0.026860125,0.004149129,0.002449037,0.0027172973,0.0009887259],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013631012,0.00057209627,0.00049702515,0.0024780815,0.0025469833,0.007977855,0.0007796223,0.001589791,0.0015635429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04059532,0.0004664235,0.00065542146,0.0013864572,0.0043901145,0.0077386606,0.0051884353,0.0015405142,0.00032885253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014923018,0.00009149076,0.056960642,0.00037827028,0.000079794176,0.00056058995,0.8856941,0.00021867992,0.0054740994,0.004576918,0.00044159906,0.04537449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021761542,0.0004695327,0.04789212,0.00040874473,0.00009659835,0.0010874028,0.9197531,0.0019516884,0.0030181818,0.0062094396,0.018935641,0.0001557475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013502185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011810316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013631012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013640346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001177649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07208854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1959212851","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2015-0058","title":"Living Lab as knowledge system: an actual approach for managing urban service projects?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Society for Arts and Technology; Université de Sherbrooke; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; General partnership; Context (archaeology); Normative; Service (business); Body of knowledge; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Political science; Marketing","score_opus":0.0588782441519511,"score_gpt":0.2786829365997607,"score_spread":0.2198046924478096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1959212851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28116694,0.0022773044,0.3412505,0.030065222,0.00037550429,0.0012103159,0.00021133045,0.0009722003,0.3424707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.920998,0.00084933685,0.058652397,0.0008173529,0.0000681425,0.00040160335,0.000114127666,0.000107044034,0.017991945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98710793,0.009747553,0.00034535816,0.00079972774,0.0011697006,0.0008298072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931705,0.0020613822,0.0006604782,0.0013375463,0.0010439182,0.0017261759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008977411,0.0003411999,0.00028901454,0.0017747249,0.004705551,0.011695214,0.0025016158,0.002156649,0.010728814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008815058,0.00025942226,0.0003679884,0.0023570498,0.009838798,0.010910301,0.012250077,0.0019756707,0.0022780178],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000866332,0.0005845999,0.008839895,0.0007994741,0.000040819767,0.0015827081,0.11937853,0.0034158977,0.0026633688,0.5652372,0.012496826,0.28487396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003828091,0.0004503044,0.005176521,0.0011535985,0.00003568129,0.0017442706,0.19385596,0.010874383,0.0028801938,0.21077351,0.57291794,0.00009933291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016333938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023049235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011695214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051901117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008842472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047477663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966353786","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2013-0183","title":"The quasi-moderating role of organizational culture in the relationship between rewards and knowledge shared and gained","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Organizational learning; Originality; Organizational culture; Knowledge value chain; Bridge (graph theory); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Knowledge transfer; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Creativity","score_opus":0.02987038917237334,"score_gpt":0.30908836214223195,"score_spread":0.2792179729698586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966353786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99274266,0.0002916152,0.0017792495,0.00035563917,0.00004075334,0.00008062461,0.00009496749,0.000013040986,0.0046014115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985599,0.00005926503,0.000609735,0.000048790916,0.0000085121155,0.00006391781,0.0000203437,0.000006027526,0.00062357687],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98396075,0.011243861,0.000773784,0.0014457554,0.0014987884,0.0010770076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7920374,0.17025632,0.016522596,0.009054689,0.0061883344,0.0059405714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016316624,0.000306145,0.00050308637,0.0006267474,0.0012933488,0.0023890792,0.0007064817,0.00048717027,0.0098650465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05186225,0.0003118811,0.0006365099,0.0007726593,0.0018591346,0.0013034914,0.002342944,0.0013066105,0.00036956882],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017529062,0.00094426307,0.94427675,0.00040046553,0.00046406855,0.00018559901,0.0080526145,0.00045381935,0.0015647834,0.0037387023,0.00035172104,0.03781429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057157366,0.0009030583,0.9846005,0.00017653608,0.00034183485,0.00010924943,0.0072490424,0.0012826603,0.0016125315,0.0021616858,0.0014761069,0.000029674467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034049533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004930348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016316624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013044967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004967816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08629155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1970683543","doi":"10.1108/13673271211218843","title":"Classifying organizations by knowledge intensity – necessary next‐steps","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Knowledge management; Originality; Leverage (statistics); Foundation (evidence); Empirical research; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Management science; Psychology; Engineering; Creativity; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027926655199130332,"score_gpt":0.2569526376823654,"score_spread":0.22902598248323508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1970683543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90994036,0.0011649966,0.030751081,0.003548911,0.0000560754,0.00102151,0.00046580806,0.00012893548,0.05292225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831108,0.00022578218,0.015432716,0.00018881728,0.000013832985,0.00026342543,0.00026784313,0.000010929067,0.00048590358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929096,0.0021251924,0.00094234187,0.0005950353,0.002459133,0.00096875825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604885,0.016623186,0.009050289,0.0040055346,0.0075108856,0.0023216538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005776789,0.00054513995,0.0005076946,0.0055281166,0.002154768,0.005755134,0.0010883554,0.00082883023,0.003432565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029700233,0.00026497728,0.0006233737,0.0039188587,0.0025446513,0.006248835,0.0040393607,0.0011729158,0.00058417616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021521143,0.00049107266,0.7086384,0.0016689887,0.0001782186,0.0003356028,0.034352716,0.0012618966,0.0033165223,0.038932934,0.0011489162,0.20945951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043458083,0.00058596145,0.6728264,0.0027467064,0.00021007772,0.0010128017,0.19002922,0.00744416,0.003737708,0.100152165,0.021090537,0.00012076434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030999577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004191984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005776789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023054949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037446255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030550957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977446819","doi":"10.1108/13673270510629945","title":"Explaining the intentions to share and reuse knowledge in the context of IT service operations","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Object Research Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Reuse; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge value chain; Computer science; Service (business); Personal knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Body of knowledge; Originality; Business; Organizational learning; Marketing; Engineering; Qualitative research; Sociology","score_opus":0.06193504452374096,"score_gpt":0.3487312126555949,"score_spread":0.28679616813185393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977446819","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9901507,0.00009730294,0.003064934,0.00053456833,0.000005380647,0.00006486416,0.000024190536,0.000013188277,0.0060447888],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829406,0.00008736761,0.0012058466,0.000028669296,0.000002608071,0.000032314678,0.000022001037,0.0000023122564,0.00032482247],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973309,0.0011841545,0.000222713,0.00020308093,0.00056315423,0.000496023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96343863,0.02648011,0.0057191257,0.0012701915,0.0019521392,0.0011399081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003869672,0.0003679149,0.00030634034,0.0015210934,0.0011981084,0.003280411,0.00061831664,0.0011520276,0.003888294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024833845,0.00038128337,0.0008864398,0.0010844842,0.0019507526,0.0024253412,0.002167428,0.0012443027,0.00026347637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000939756,0.0010285213,0.85899687,0.00034379453,0.00012418652,0.00055142055,0.061934564,0.0039021163,0.0009103439,0.016381495,0.00054053986,0.055192154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063207786,0.0006854754,0.7315449,0.0011290871,0.00033716622,0.0005535398,0.17196138,0.049732592,0.0017108562,0.035691533,0.0064883414,0.000101905964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013194538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011507884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013194538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017071733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046723466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026235461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1978538169","doi":"10.1108/13673271311315141","title":"Three shapes of organisational knowledge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Knowledge management; Typology; Knowledge value chain; Explicit knowledge; Originality; Production (economics); Value (mathematics); Computer science; Domain knowledge; Organizational learning; Body of knowledge; Sociology; Qualitative research; Economics","score_opus":0.021534643785210354,"score_gpt":0.23723092958299585,"score_spread":0.2156962857977855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1978538169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10822948,0.0035739671,0.11205299,0.014706406,0.0003210666,0.00019225829,0.00019242724,0.00020633505,0.76052517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9654946,0.0009675855,0.0218337,0.0006268787,0.000081561535,0.00020570063,0.00010661752,0.000043982032,0.010639304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864296,0.005592424,0.0006911484,0.0016030107,0.004483516,0.0012002388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846912,0.0070954096,0.0012785337,0.004224503,0.0017331803,0.0009771469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006475786,0.0005247284,0.00058240606,0.0056025693,0.004090371,0.023172574,0.0020170184,0.0030739782,0.005396468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019317234,0.00046548052,0.0012268744,0.0040231356,0.03541688,0.021211544,0.009425523,0.0025778397,0.000987211],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000131379165,0.0000065483764,0.00060159375,0.00003603607,0.000005048133,0.000046594043,0.0046627917,0.00032773672,0.00008145278,0.98334163,0.000339224,0.010538246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089465675,0.000017701588,0.00083249505,0.00011096292,0.000008354225,0.00014879284,0.0073323874,0.0012881437,0.00019618528,0.97026753,0.019770244,0.000018336972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023131203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015959038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023172574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006678639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004273661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048457146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1980887383","doi":"10.1108/13673271311315231","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2013 update","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":183,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Journal ranking; Citation; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation impact; Reputation; Originality; Knowledge management; Pace; Citation analysis; Computer science; Business; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.01855700776200159,"score_gpt":0.2555728564973881,"score_spread":0.2370158487353865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1980887383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34990045,0.1764475,0.020459326,0.043371636,0.018090168,0.0011496916,0.15360057,0.005011353,0.23196927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6977559,0.110917464,0.046342395,0.0042627477,0.0070267026,0.0006633897,0.09853899,0.0012041292,0.03328832],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98581463,0.0013528623,0.0023831266,0.00090144086,0.0085451435,0.0010027898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9307713,0.008113616,0.009083431,0.0019821788,0.046817917,0.0032315468],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011161836,0.0012865701,0.0013409486,0.058831647,0.0011016761,0.008521139,0.0010520282,0.0007397125,0.0062724277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02846989,0.0003336361,0.0011011725,0.06642523,0.0010571677,0.005609829,0.0025680831,0.0011103896,0.0035790082],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003354014,0.00017523009,0.10305985,0.004871341,0.00037845693,0.00028537447,0.000651854,0.001152895,0.0017242482,0.004643512,0.18063822,0.7020835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064439846,0.00043227294,0.4362444,0.0030638627,0.0006986009,0.0015324916,0.0025874106,0.0019549874,0.0046857833,0.0031183562,0.54536533,0.00025206828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008880084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01128018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94116837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041364087,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010059057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059030116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991768282","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2014-0061","title":"Trouble with tacit: developing a new perspective and approach","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Organizational Learning and Leadership","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Originality; Perspective (graphical); Phenomenon; Action (physics); Explicit knowledge; Value (mathematics); Epistemology; Extant taxon; Knowledge management; Empirical research; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.02015747275111354,"score_gpt":0.21936480240056613,"score_spread":0.1992073296494526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991768282","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016383993,0.034208357,0.39245522,0.09552221,0.0039702645,0.00016001203,0.00013063912,0.00021642586,0.4569529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72577655,0.027434353,0.16952877,0.0141643975,0.0055904686,0.0008320484,0.00022709095,0.000405392,0.05604095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99218446,0.0051158383,0.0002726326,0.0007561999,0.0011625896,0.0005083494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98752916,0.0085642515,0.00070782006,0.0012799852,0.0011638382,0.0007549803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008963317,0.0012669831,0.00110731,0.0066948514,0.0057706498,0.01962459,0.003850404,0.0064311675,0.004590777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006844967,0.0005462213,0.0011476988,0.004521507,0.050496556,0.025547775,0.0075529367,0.010850311,0.0013238013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042410907,0.000011240199,0.000079982,0.000048912723,0.0000032337398,0.00009891522,0.00467289,0.00013532581,0.00003781124,0.98902786,0.001042526,0.0048370846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000059705544,0.000015165888,0.0001377288,0.00029458094,0.0000064378173,0.00028673437,0.00513994,0.0014422262,0.00015863588,0.88503426,0.10746347,0.000014739684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041141002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038550724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01962459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078123026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006422702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056682527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992573885","doi":"10.1108/13673270710832181","title":"A systems‐based dynamic knowledge transfer capacity model","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Complex Systems and Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Absorptive capacity; Computer science; Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Knowledge base; Knowledge value chain; Originality; Systems thinking; Complex adaptive system; Dissemination; Management science; Organizational learning; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Sociology","score_opus":0.16963118855940812,"score_gpt":0.4042498183079086,"score_spread":0.2346186297485005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992573885","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08728463,0.0009060194,0.58602554,0.00975358,0.00014181106,0.00068869453,0.00077926344,0.0005189044,0.3139015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9558214,0.0005201909,0.027865084,0.00030896039,0.000068453846,0.00061548915,0.00017038867,0.000050648672,0.014579364],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715614,0.0010747953,0.00012457687,0.0005197113,0.0007187518,0.00040591703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923701,0.004846768,0.00058346905,0.000662353,0.0010776924,0.0004596102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003793578,0.0009079441,0.00061356014,0.0032268525,0.0013879606,0.0047579017,0.0032097416,0.0026402147,0.01671666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012240173,0.00042552908,0.0011734226,0.0023634555,0.0052911956,0.009464554,0.0048607495,0.0020062546,0.0016462017],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028818544,0.00009481905,0.0013016426,0.00015247814,0.0000475917,0.0002697084,0.0010792055,0.09897444,0.0005556954,0.8793852,0.0016607643,0.016449781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002819623,0.00007712468,0.0007575358,0.00010989658,0.00003901975,0.00023561505,0.00081731676,0.3065093,0.00046579386,0.6794259,0.011494663,0.00003964189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004649956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014624185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01671666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052126828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041149287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055922806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997808463","doi":"10.1108/13673270210450432","title":"A knowledge management reference model","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Computer science; Construct (python library); Structuring; Blueprint; Conceptual model; Reference model; Process management; Management science; Business; Software engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.06991347479793608,"score_gpt":0.27195534194619364,"score_spread":0.20204186714825756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997808463","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071828486,0.0014301001,0.81225795,0.009367549,0.0002805018,0.000738344,0.0009913096,0.0010280795,0.16672322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24988972,0.0025462736,0.67857105,0.0019701896,0.0002742698,0.0020235744,0.004059432,0.00029239728,0.060373098],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99408495,0.002145783,0.0006268917,0.0008979073,0.0017556364,0.00048874837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943528,0.0016408454,0.00054220913,0.0009799856,0.00215014,0.0003340237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005490847,0.00092721224,0.00077265344,0.00476407,0.0024763662,0.009570788,0.007261616,0.005334477,0.009854931],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010847947,0.000654896,0.0016854136,0.0052690213,0.002609986,0.013343749,0.0034602042,0.0028394337,0.005396187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012929846,0.000032173928,0.00030057735,0.00008146959,0.000012325408,0.00016814773,0.0005855339,0.009001476,0.00016057811,0.9640364,0.004363189,0.021245176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005269198,0.00008517744,0.00053938734,0.000488344,0.000046637877,0.000494821,0.0007647087,0.07228263,0.00067041087,0.6384146,0.28609157,0.00006901866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017234514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008232418,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017234514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053838654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007922437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039062858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2003665551","doi":"10.1108/13673270710752162","title":"IT for KM in the management consulting industry","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Computer science; Enabling; Workflow; Service (business); Data management; The Internet; Business; World Wide Web; Data mining; Database","score_opus":0.03891106876844171,"score_gpt":0.3073430211284606,"score_spread":0.26843195236001893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2003665551","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3809655,0.020555487,0.047675557,0.061904795,0.00030396137,0.00026512056,0.0001696604,0.00031788342,0.48784193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98760045,0.0021720761,0.006186563,0.001114181,0.00006549395,0.00004437734,0.000031620257,0.000016069418,0.0027691356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950956,0.0022882174,0.00027944308,0.00038389233,0.0011651816,0.0007876459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873582,0.0072085396,0.0019091377,0.0008758872,0.0013242554,0.001324032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031406647,0.00032363605,0.00032610234,0.002718687,0.0028808261,0.009668669,0.0007536404,0.0020201835,0.005981697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011698814,0.0002175461,0.00052503677,0.005972234,0.005963168,0.008598232,0.0033050962,0.0020289207,0.0007202729],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007666664,0.00017918146,0.03740609,0.00091678894,0.00006323421,0.0007415385,0.011848736,0.0030520663,0.00076384144,0.7557998,0.0065349527,0.18261717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052887928,0.00018779193,0.07197382,0.002439756,0.00012365585,0.0015376735,0.04676078,0.016682034,0.0019097393,0.71564,0.14257623,0.00011561925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008748336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0081518255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010116755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010116755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013141044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073402524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022807203","doi":"10.1108/13673270910997088","title":"Knowledge management and organizational performance: an exploratory analysis","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":791,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Organizational performance; Business; Knowledge management; Excellence; Originality; Organizational learning; Formative assessment; Operational excellence; Organizational culture; Value (mathematics); Exploratory research; Best practice; Marketing; Psychology; Public relations; Management; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.015896551925703283,"score_gpt":0.23411687994003821,"score_spread":0.21822032801433494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022807203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9833535,0.00020794652,0.003966037,0.00036930898,0.0000064840133,0.00063906814,0.0010627958,0.000046940346,0.010347985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99292326,0.00014003807,0.0051609287,0.000037590406,0.000008294177,0.000541832,0.00046357504,0.000013457605,0.00071097433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99595225,0.002137751,0.0002223343,0.00021765233,0.0010823393,0.00038762225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9709952,0.024298297,0.0015646769,0.0009892423,0.001713305,0.00043921068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005483057,0.00050109666,0.00059163646,0.0059794798,0.0014566233,0.0026961237,0.00072747265,0.00046845173,0.003670022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016554086,0.00024351991,0.0010129996,0.0056391405,0.0013585751,0.0017981105,0.0028001799,0.0009126524,0.00036120453],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005545592,0.0015658726,0.69899225,0.001623746,0.0004270419,0.0018880393,0.10486597,0.002383278,0.0025203584,0.012685861,0.001976342,0.17051668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006790706,0.0019460467,0.80056745,0.0008481386,0.0003261933,0.0012641225,0.1634126,0.010476327,0.0025354864,0.008817535,0.009647084,0.00009114246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002155725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020019151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0059794798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001467425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028039427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02899754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2038208731","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2013-0448","title":"Organizational structure and knowledge-practice diffusion in the MNC","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Multinational corporation; Interdependence; Knowledge sharing; Business; Organizational structure; Originality; Knowledge value chain; Organizational learning; Computer science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Management","score_opus":0.009282660652158181,"score_gpt":0.2358800156340489,"score_spread":0.2265973549818907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2038208731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99436426,0.00007112664,0.0008108186,0.00031613425,0.000002922735,0.000040701114,0.0000061140145,0.0000057290827,0.0043820716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923384,0.000023699635,0.0004112533,0.000020050054,0.0000015685513,0.000010565727,0.0000063109496,0.0000015852241,0.00029121304],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99333364,0.003856714,0.00025298545,0.0006175193,0.0012248105,0.0007144349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9660054,0.019101681,0.0071313754,0.0024874716,0.002632465,0.0026416217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006440796,0.00016487196,0.0002658782,0.0023577823,0.0030960669,0.0050047846,0.0008461125,0.0008354664,0.002070001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021887902,0.00023088638,0.000118207405,0.0015495052,0.0060809623,0.0025070906,0.0044864183,0.00088005216,0.00014413887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029573514,0.00082446897,0.5110433,0.00025479306,0.000097548305,0.0011893737,0.33041462,0.0024604145,0.0050785486,0.036259383,0.0005408381,0.11154091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007399391,0.00054469536,0.5880807,0.00030636237,0.000048065896,0.0005239041,0.3713366,0.006370923,0.0016175704,0.01222638,0.018808585,0.000062198036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016088203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01900111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016088203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008455836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066128806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061351717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042635584","doi":"10.1108/13673270010315957","title":"Network Map: visualizing telecommunications service","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Peter's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Telecommunications service; Telecommunications; Relation (database); Service provider; Service (business); Order (exchange); Path (computing); Knowledge management; Telecommunications network; World Wide Web; Business; Database; Computer network; Marketing","score_opus":0.030266752621583307,"score_gpt":0.3152555174567208,"score_spread":0.2849887648351375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042635584","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09116827,0.0018726332,0.6189821,0.0036760308,0.0005673388,0.0004017927,0.052120406,0.10206963,0.12914181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5576611,0.003103,0.38555163,0.00035354937,0.00021564585,0.0004733435,0.026910542,0.00661636,0.019114887],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998129,0.00004376719,0.0000100827765,0.000027066026,0.00008000729,0.000026233693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995364,0.00019793138,0.000038553047,0.000043769232,0.00012419904,0.000059217396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035729885,0.00081077934,0.00026740046,0.0030402825,0.00051432283,0.0019838458,0.00054218934,0.0005115399,0.020642325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017318999,0.00021203773,0.00034525173,0.0032665036,0.0001879108,0.0016992934,0.0013602239,0.00075268006,0.0024522697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008300548,0.00022476623,0.01359854,0.0014886868,0.00019485009,0.0013589866,0.011146321,0.032412995,0.019915769,0.06068732,0.38959184,0.46854988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012744145,0.00010666141,0.015709538,0.0004090462,0.00013372242,0.0011213811,0.0062090466,0.23467551,0.016692353,0.04520267,0.67944807,0.00016454759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011985761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010759116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020642325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045603412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008597981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06905538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048416284","doi":"10.1108/13673270810902939","title":"<i>Places Rated Almanacs</i> and roll out neoliberalism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Foregrounding; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Neoliberalism (international relations); Originality; Relevance (law); Sociology; Explanatory power; Competitive advantage; Political science; Marketing; Business; Political economy; Social science; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04970308707949492,"score_gpt":0.29385870564529326,"score_spread":0.24415561856579834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048416284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90529436,0.0007941136,0.0018611613,0.0070864595,0.000099968296,0.000027340006,0.00008756172,0.000023556267,0.08472557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981159,0.00010369283,0.00029125254,0.00015230583,0.000022391041,0.0000056583835,0.000011209574,0.0000025623283,0.0012950626],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834955,0.0009212434,0.00007515632,0.00017126695,0.00028811983,0.00019478641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99100435,0.0024276942,0.0031319892,0.00096116157,0.0011706391,0.0013041899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003712919,0.00011361802,0.00015006274,0.0011453917,0.0015583913,0.0050125737,0.00061387516,0.0004396809,0.0048872535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077826097,0.00008877497,0.00017110349,0.001448952,0.0058682896,0.0031151904,0.003056965,0.0010273189,0.00031360777],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001784019,0.00029825454,0.48940995,0.0003918934,0.000059922073,0.0005539817,0.15488897,0.0005037701,0.00091798615,0.15074319,0.006520283,0.19553342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009348063,0.00019956793,0.60965645,0.00051513466,0.000027649785,0.000424514,0.2905831,0.0012496357,0.00078071665,0.03147987,0.0650069,0.00006714565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047759274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010269199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050125737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016313376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013912614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019636035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050991272","doi":"10.1108/eum0000000005868","title":"The who, what and why of knowledge mapping","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":215,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Intellectual capital; Knowledge value chain; Organizational memory; Process (computing); Computer science; Personal knowledge management; Business","score_opus":0.027383096189470876,"score_gpt":0.2541308014971049,"score_spread":0.226747705307634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050991272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039545037,0.05120797,0.16755305,0.34709647,0.004489659,0.00029592268,0.0003235699,0.0003723565,0.38911593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8424243,0.039440554,0.057774533,0.025089687,0.0025042284,0.00033128206,0.00023520751,0.0003847912,0.031815507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98563045,0.0075713694,0.0008299384,0.0012041469,0.0035010858,0.0012629959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9446725,0.042320557,0.0031892806,0.0031205583,0.0052846223,0.0014123532],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01438197,0.00070179073,0.0008736673,0.0054835845,0.0066990703,0.017615708,0.0017079122,0.0062510413,0.005736009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04721706,0.0006306292,0.00079945865,0.0052753226,0.029599186,0.03810842,0.0048539634,0.0034911598,0.001800944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004165338,0.00006500532,0.005119361,0.0005330367,0.00003649679,0.000317635,0.012352252,0.00076611753,0.0004511848,0.7818656,0.02037415,0.17807752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010283473,0.00002585134,0.0024517574,0.0010639055,0.000024874507,0.00059473707,0.016464066,0.0016689074,0.0008324562,0.8289299,0.14787373,0.000059429363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068247467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004623958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017615708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058283308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010647417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07606006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052495896","doi":"10.1108/13673270210417664","title":"Managing effective knowledge transfer: an integrative framework and some practice implications","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":891,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Competitive advantage; Process (computing); Knowledge value chain; Set (abstract data type); Key (lock); Computer science; Organizational learning; Conceptual framework; Business; Conceptual model; Process management; Marketing; Sociology","score_opus":0.019403041489920482,"score_gpt":0.2845775252730982,"score_spread":0.2651744837831777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052495896","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0544823,0.06626935,0.45603034,0.1851632,0.0009003083,0.002423205,0.00017427493,0.0005394141,0.23401758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56891793,0.05047143,0.3596266,0.004940822,0.0007703627,0.0040844535,0.00017306402,0.00011387741,0.010901525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98586166,0.009472754,0.0007891218,0.00065700064,0.002301112,0.00091832905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.983907,0.011626383,0.00086267834,0.0008272721,0.0018182205,0.0009584085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029791802,0.0033124776,0.0018852593,0.008530039,0.00750381,0.024323845,0.0072753374,0.012648056,0.0050295037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014232973,0.0013761242,0.0015021682,0.008511186,0.026588105,0.02587573,0.012755956,0.005047923,0.0010853399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043247815,0.00034451307,0.0016098693,0.0016391259,0.00005907297,0.0008466909,0.020424372,0.0066609792,0.0006528685,0.8598069,0.003610308,0.104302004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000793534,0.00038063884,0.0016790683,0.0066510285,0.000098124525,0.0014669457,0.062141884,0.022824343,0.0011047783,0.83247364,0.070985116,0.000115033836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005070144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057181777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029791802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0114781745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014563761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.157556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066550266","doi":"10.1108/13670410529073","title":"Establishing a global KM initiative: the Wipro story","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Indian Economic and Social Development","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"RealNetworks (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Outsourcing; Competitive advantage; Knowledge management; Customer needs; Knowledge sharing; Value (mathematics); Marketing; Competitive intelligence; Knowledge economy; Computer science","score_opus":0.03186474971320101,"score_gpt":0.23283983838268565,"score_spread":0.20097508866948466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066550266","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04789888,0.008595578,0.0040942784,0.46868047,0.0019894813,0.00007159333,0.00023096068,0.00032762412,0.46811104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70243204,0.015582699,0.0047424375,0.16998398,0.0023252144,0.00025831527,0.0006942533,0.00051958405,0.10346149],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965726,0.0012533426,0.00009074639,0.0002874666,0.00079920556,0.0009966964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938531,0.0026655833,0.00049950334,0.00050749903,0.00068303646,0.0017913587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006042193,0.00069733197,0.0003232771,0.0012912491,0.005519169,0.0115105575,0.00094564166,0.006724935,0.005529863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007024945,0.0003324464,0.00053894817,0.0025592793,0.0067021144,0.015551676,0.009726487,0.009964909,0.0018864647],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012566807,0.0001788019,0.0038447517,0.00067944004,0.000037931048,0.0043944637,0.022293333,0.00048784158,0.0009542056,0.35962293,0.46080345,0.14657721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018736439,0.00006669406,0.002053691,0.00026599912,0.00001460103,0.0011943603,0.014514116,0.00016430327,0.00059926906,0.019816957,0.9612579,0.000033432192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035747613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003373945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0115105575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029490285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045166374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031954587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2069956476","doi":"10.1108/13673270410541015","title":"Knowledge‐related asymmetries in strategic alliances","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Alliance; Knowledge management; Business; Realization (probability); Stability (learning theory); Strategic alliance; Industrial organization; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.032788235050538087,"score_gpt":0.26761822513790795,"score_spread":0.23482999008736988,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2069956476","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6019779,0.00709241,0.16218124,0.0073506576,0.00013236624,0.00025148562,0.00021132304,0.00009068847,0.22071193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99519324,0.000736108,0.0027571335,0.00006918264,0.000035921203,0.000049062513,0.000024792309,0.000004589257,0.0011299718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367493,0.0028265454,0.00039733722,0.00043164042,0.0017450474,0.00092450925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9712747,0.018951591,0.0056274473,0.0015954655,0.0015161228,0.0010347315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007908945,0.00040929287,0.00068381743,0.0035895603,0.0021154366,0.0059259264,0.0008684914,0.0018337946,0.0061182417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03495478,0.00037850635,0.00064198393,0.00236493,0.00555018,0.013939605,0.005827273,0.001958599,0.00047184742],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045208166,0.000030525614,0.0024390875,0.00007678545,0.000021424283,0.00019692369,0.001510317,0.0062445425,0.00026179018,0.97440535,0.00022616007,0.014541889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027275782,0.00003567006,0.002300216,0.00007783341,0.000031285737,0.00015606704,0.0011764498,0.0073743323,0.00027167928,0.9848877,0.003640942,0.000020518197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014760541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010955887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007908945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033024943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020936222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041826963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076239839","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2014-0220","title":"Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part I: articles and their characteristics","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Normative; Originality; Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Maturity (psychological); Sociology; Performative utterance; Library science; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Social science; Computer science; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.08429222483228879,"score_gpt":0.3240416567415362,"score_spread":0.23974943190924738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076239839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5021975,0.25929978,0.004276997,0.0068161776,0.009245399,0.0015466152,0.10705712,0.0013635071,0.10819684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7370595,0.12654339,0.020928696,0.0011309054,0.0072696083,0.0018927534,0.06212599,0.00064704265,0.04240216],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99370956,0.0005382346,0.0018669341,0.00044980927,0.0030744118,0.00036108668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9353642,0.024312181,0.019982792,0.0013992438,0.01593264,0.0030090136],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030588242,0.000912678,0.0011648468,0.09659287,0.0017054603,0.006314948,0.00077981176,0.00079972687,0.012624088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031394508,0.0003032598,0.000958169,0.13098118,0.00080965564,0.0028494936,0.0015144857,0.00045999925,0.0029906086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010824163,0.00016642116,0.18084307,0.03538015,0.00096697564,0.0021052489,0.007103197,0.0006476376,0.008172576,0.009460742,0.11421984,0.6398517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007188421,0.0003163301,0.44972613,0.0074203815,0.0007558217,0.009972136,0.007584378,0.0007096646,0.004100991,0.0054256865,0.51378536,0.00013117428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014043555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026850265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9034071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019267485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032606546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0422318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079387804","doi":"10.1108/13673270410567648","title":"Innovation in the knowing organization: a case study of an e‐commerce initiative","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Innovation Council; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Sensemaking; Knowledge management; Openness to experience; Business; Context (archaeology); Competition (biology); Set (abstract data type); Knowledge sharing; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.04420585512517853,"score_gpt":0.29138479798713646,"score_spread":0.24717894286195793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079387804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97603613,0.00018795831,0.0023779664,0.0025351925,0.00003017511,0.000085884196,0.000016873357,0.000016942224,0.018712914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913639,0.00037738198,0.0033402925,0.0004479898,0.000026065243,0.00007451345,0.000025234187,0.000021359987,0.0043232017],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99180436,0.005738902,0.00017455545,0.00041806285,0.0008390808,0.0010250509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98143965,0.013292402,0.001044539,0.0009278565,0.00075759453,0.00253797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008036228,0.00048437633,0.0005564523,0.0018565039,0.017776001,0.008622959,0.0022489158,0.0052960287,0.0026244684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013655847,0.00050507754,0.0006240523,0.002124113,0.010739539,0.0072976183,0.0053804577,0.0049324566,0.00045332892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020109839,0.00223594,0.020080326,0.00018479113,0.00002594609,0.02399953,0.86001796,0.00070174236,0.001475669,0.053955454,0.0025965683,0.034525048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008287695,0.00066398847,0.008356067,0.00022459045,0.000038215763,0.008787669,0.9116745,0.0028080328,0.0022205573,0.008546976,0.056518026,0.00007850532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006223607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017392958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017776001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003749686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040343455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04250014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085098328","doi":"10.1108/13673271011050120","title":"Are full and partial knowledge sharing the same?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Distrust; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Interpersonal communication; Situational ethics; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Originality; Computer science","score_opus":0.03653689969233438,"score_gpt":0.3175679301266231,"score_spread":0.28103103043428873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085098328","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990272,0.0004561984,0.0012524937,0.00071144936,0.000011176324,0.000024055389,0.000032136173,0.000008448231,0.0072319983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999468,0.00008526291,0.00023778132,0.000045363573,0.0000048372212,0.000008454989,0.000012417972,0.0000016212214,0.0001361622],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947338,0.0025709956,0.00036806217,0.0005847891,0.0009661313,0.00077621575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639701,0.016743764,0.011946439,0.0035121262,0.0014538122,0.0023737235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054231384,0.0001713376,0.0004180998,0.00085021806,0.0009634042,0.0032853866,0.000639009,0.0009033086,0.002842615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043522082,0.0003584645,0.00045132762,0.00081727566,0.0036777835,0.0051786564,0.0026656154,0.0007488796,0.00015821293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005658045,0.00039959716,0.81493306,0.00042661207,0.00034857306,0.00030886944,0.027240248,0.0004422403,0.0015970629,0.01876445,0.00036857897,0.13460484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033868393,0.0005649945,0.8797974,0.00040942687,0.00020392945,0.0014685623,0.060541444,0.0017472988,0.0011979257,0.050369594,0.0035887132,0.00007681298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017522007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016478584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054231384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005997762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015106507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028680682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2085429409","doi":"10.1108/13673271011032337","title":"Research paradigms of contemporary knowledge management studies: 1998‐2007","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":114,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Personal knowledge management; Originality; Body of knowledge; Citation; Knowledge value chain; Citation analysis; Computer science; Field (mathematics); Organizational learning; Data science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.15411087719495636,"score_gpt":0.44869040560739837,"score_spread":0.294579528412442,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2085429409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13809344,0.314485,0.029804891,0.13701567,0.003819695,0.00034063225,0.00083701004,0.00017126913,0.3754324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.835017,0.12495834,0.016303392,0.004661325,0.0021975911,0.0005528934,0.00056598545,0.00011957026,0.015623917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889109,0.004117869,0.0010002757,0.0014273877,0.004093327,0.00045021833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9649433,0.02087871,0.003619824,0.0019469415,0.007347831,0.0012634747],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014167278,0.00050839776,0.0005373499,0.0175342,0.0054768478,0.02055756,0.0012742176,0.0025797714,0.003853059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02995676,0.00036444032,0.00052509684,0.03309507,0.014767262,0.015567168,0.0039492594,0.0031700719,0.00065591105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007495295,0.000065333865,0.006463151,0.0010390305,0.000027678587,0.00022732474,0.04292526,0.00035332155,0.00030107048,0.7586195,0.01127935,0.17862399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027011234,0.00004209564,0.016909366,0.0044976864,0.000032587857,0.0009033707,0.052987788,0.001174593,0.000626013,0.28394324,0.63879377,0.00006250389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074173943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006384054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98583275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026197372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015458241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19007611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090475760","doi":"10.1108/13673270710762747","title":"Rapid knowledge work visualization for organizations","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Business Process Modeling and Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Computer science; Visualization; Work (physics); Data science; Data mining; Engineering","score_opus":0.02289148838525654,"score_gpt":0.27940647280527126,"score_spread":0.2565149844200147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090475760","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026956802,0.00025184886,0.9148265,0.0013636339,0.00015155174,0.00025818296,0.0011233283,0.047307435,0.0077607213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14996229,0.00023491184,0.84407455,0.000078904355,0.00003458832,0.0003329724,0.0014510117,0.0016669298,0.0021638751],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987269,0.000492952,0.000082920786,0.00017031058,0.0004498981,0.00007706772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99322927,0.003394693,0.00037937282,0.0015051309,0.0012021511,0.00028934688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027046339,0.0009939129,0.00051003083,0.00231467,0.0008859142,0.0053739497,0.0012623233,0.0013741009,0.009674117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012582129,0.0005806764,0.00073320174,0.0013870299,0.0005807608,0.004835921,0.0037591457,0.001784468,0.0021232844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007486506,0.00033175276,0.007866286,0.0009894735,0.00011818578,0.0009310366,0.0075879567,0.0630559,0.023702588,0.11584316,0.059212316,0.7196127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001620747,0.0001415929,0.0025324621,0.00035979407,0.00004870832,0.0006054692,0.0017007855,0.7014494,0.024793912,0.107387446,0.16068253,0.00013579482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023679053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028965164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009674117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008451874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013568101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032363117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091559507","doi":"10.1108/13673271311300840","title":"The intellectual core and impact of the knowledge management academic discipline","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Originality; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Engineering ethics; Body of knowledge; Citation; Computer science; Library science; Social science; Engineering","score_opus":0.039770719152386044,"score_gpt":0.35494247639805715,"score_spread":0.3151717572456711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091559507","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6668474,0.011896185,0.01957718,0.009354335,0.00048830203,0.00022935943,0.00019837482,0.0001293335,0.2912795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99211663,0.0017397671,0.0037885967,0.0002567985,0.00024269434,0.000054148146,0.00005737999,0.000020496063,0.0017234555],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844312,0.0063735642,0.0010252212,0.001020532,0.0064273244,0.0007221196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8395638,0.10036773,0.01823898,0.013391907,0.022814209,0.005623409],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018939953,0.00022806048,0.0006907551,0.01542921,0.0034880952,0.012866697,0.0012189391,0.0010419581,0.0048030675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076992884,0.00022697278,0.00047776458,0.011397044,0.013682314,0.007525343,0.005934486,0.0012014105,0.00065671856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003567231,0.00055243744,0.1196336,0.002798709,0.00029944838,0.000985982,0.053518564,0.0013961787,0.0037188013,0.34194675,0.002353158,0.4724397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012028898,0.00090872485,0.31224257,0.0037757775,0.0003857244,0.002363549,0.09738413,0.0052176593,0.006208855,0.4716582,0.09957074,0.0001637516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012196121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001270729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034287209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008014803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10016525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098532060","doi":"10.1108/13673271311315150","title":"Building knowledge: developing a knowledge‐based dynamic capabilities typology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":212,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Knowledge management; Computer science; Consistency (knowledge bases); Dynamic capabilities; Originality; Extant taxon; Fragmentation (computing); Resource (disambiguation); Data science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.019532258594272066,"score_gpt":0.2743946296124274,"score_spread":0.25486237101815534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098532060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2740812,0.0037126164,0.2159299,0.010537901,0.00031113025,0.0014447193,0.00088506105,0.00022120187,0.49287626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93861353,0.0017716788,0.05430124,0.00035902165,0.000043184344,0.0009162917,0.0003996753,0.000034409994,0.0035609526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366343,0.0032795954,0.0006304875,0.0005308695,0.0012922966,0.00060329423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840395,0.010461033,0.001518984,0.0012325568,0.0020712214,0.00067670003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072556576,0.0006167961,0.00042519678,0.015759498,0.003374335,0.009962615,0.0017098873,0.0017308029,0.0046406034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016210148,0.0002520091,0.0007715623,0.0102632195,0.011619597,0.019790754,0.0073751854,0.0015846736,0.00043982576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020408828,0.000049596645,0.012082022,0.00041644034,0.00002296511,0.00035720214,0.036537074,0.0021511496,0.00026532557,0.88114417,0.0021204425,0.064833164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021822063,0.00007663797,0.009340295,0.0022590251,0.000041469604,0.00082952424,0.1699336,0.009408795,0.0008889054,0.6958696,0.11123535,0.000094920884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037696965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031372537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015759498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006014347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005532383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043637335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099755860","doi":"10.1108/13673270510629954","title":"Powerful public sector knowledge management: a school district example","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":104,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Originality; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Literacy; Data collection; Sociology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Computer science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.04765527884549008,"score_gpt":0.30697230164395783,"score_spread":0.25931702279846774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099755860","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88073,0.0005025549,0.0017919419,0.002438516,0.00003319289,0.00018179316,0.0002430871,0.000077306315,0.11400162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911737,0.00016534097,0.00042426726,0.000049619706,0.000008900108,0.000019059244,0.000061903964,0.000005019012,0.008092231],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99782604,0.0007934479,0.0000673677,0.0001598463,0.00032054356,0.00083271076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99780494,0.0006232183,0.00021155158,0.00024217849,0.000402801,0.0007152515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001013474,0.00012315642,0.0001992158,0.0014974687,0.00991595,0.0050417003,0.0010489014,0.00057477463,0.007086061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025324502,0.00024686448,0.00016307799,0.003363635,0.002649261,0.0013525808,0.003461319,0.0008113145,0.000507503],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047666806,0.0017215905,0.2271665,0.00081617816,0.00009040831,0.015874736,0.2970475,0.010124329,0.0025608083,0.22908762,0.029804802,0.18522881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016792057,0.0004678585,0.15546785,0.00018062306,0.00009398247,0.0018626766,0.46377808,0.0043473695,0.0014559268,0.0089721065,0.36314,0.00006556249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32012287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5147937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32012287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014183323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013331476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6365191},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102372409","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2015-0086","title":"Citation classics published in <i>Knowledge Management</i> journals. Part II: studying research trends and discovering the Google Scholar Effect","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Publish or perish; Originality; Citation impact; Reputation; Publication; Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Library science; Sociology; Computer science; Social science; Political science; Publishing; Business; Advertising; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.1557059683560485,"score_gpt":0.41521348292678306,"score_spread":0.25950751457073457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102372409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8756511,0.05041332,0.0035949207,0.0073264656,0.0025438122,0.00036399162,0.02595796,0.0005839786,0.03356455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95241904,0.015810262,0.007264399,0.0007836144,0.0020575486,0.0002850443,0.011077197,0.00020725491,0.010095588],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942912,0.00063264754,0.0009784396,0.0007343968,0.00304397,0.00031938672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91048336,0.035915844,0.028686373,0.0037221508,0.018275985,0.002916283],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006988451,0.00040429377,0.0007488436,0.042524353,0.0013609113,0.0056334,0.0007195093,0.0008301059,0.00391604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05557763,0.00026049744,0.00068007974,0.070293374,0.001112274,0.004141271,0.0016010039,0.0006222335,0.0014256678],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061184634,0.00010176313,0.52604705,0.008844286,0.0006424397,0.0007746062,0.013230498,0.00084233115,0.004531896,0.022754204,0.062179662,0.35943946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003915816,0.00029688238,0.8030383,0.0021339438,0.00040184218,0.0016524995,0.009796433,0.0015093375,0.0037079577,0.009715873,0.16760059,0.00010731305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035121676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073864553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99301153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027013908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002764935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036958873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2106903238","doi":"10.1108/13673270310493001","title":"Braintrust International 2003 Conference, San Francisco, CA","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"RealNetworks (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Maturity (psychological); Workflow; Knowledge management; GRASP; Knowledge creation; Business; International business; Computer science; Management; Political science; Marketing; Economics","score_opus":0.019719533118145376,"score_gpt":0.24743075902223202,"score_spread":0.22771122590408666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2106903238","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006985402,0.013084377,0.004161942,0.021911973,0.007864069,0.00010361794,0.0018724845,0.0016249556,0.94239116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007736485,0.0031724274,0.0010635376,0.00052466703,0.00027888702,0.000029672494,0.000977712,0.00018465752,0.9860319],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995981,0.000035736513,0.000016133692,0.00007373884,0.00021205771,0.000064290216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994394,0.000038385548,0.000025478226,0.000038164926,0.00028005676,0.00017842521],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006899514,0.00060447195,0.00035885788,0.00069033547,0.0014963847,0.003751115,0.00086509075,0.0018876968,0.336098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009297623,0.00028037158,0.00027707726,0.00063109817,0.00048578263,0.0021650873,0.001174707,0.0014719518,0.13753065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008161144,0.000037550693,0.00023693083,0.000051738036,0.0000049111886,0.00017536468,0.000077240016,0.00008309015,0.00043434027,0.0026317965,0.922597,0.073588446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009994627,0.00001352433,0.0008309015,0.000059319955,0.000004306452,0.000095860385,0.000116976305,0.00015446144,0.00016587519,0.0006598779,0.9978834,0.0000055189416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021117443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062039208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.336098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012034453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020674034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94697565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108300398","doi":"10.1108/13673270310463581","title":"The e‐flow audit: an evaluation of knowledge flow within and outside a high‐tech firm","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Audit; Business; Knowledge flow; Survey data collection; Perception; Snapshot (computer storage); Flow chart; Proxy (statistics); Computer science; Psychology; Accounting; Statistics","score_opus":0.028551720095253152,"score_gpt":0.2645864809216869,"score_spread":0.23603476082643376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108300398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99608886,0.00007607734,0.00086659455,0.000094108414,0.000014053205,0.00024104209,0.0001003321,0.000029682562,0.0024893028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99689746,0.00013236524,0.0019447195,0.000041553136,0.000018597717,0.00012421432,0.00016803152,0.000008234135,0.0006648648],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805493,0.012167612,0.0017958168,0.00048765575,0.0041383314,0.00086135353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88488996,0.06738311,0.017741801,0.0038734362,0.02105319,0.0050584846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023857402,0.000371988,0.00034506875,0.005248007,0.0013146219,0.0016605438,0.00073349144,0.0007465571,0.0010623898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06372205,0.00023079525,0.0004070928,0.0022008282,0.0010341865,0.002890664,0.0021801726,0.0005902146,0.00024546543],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004202729,0.004394384,0.6843454,0.00072034326,0.00020093952,0.00043429664,0.020490203,0.0016923306,0.0031150111,0.0010144034,0.0018762412,0.27751362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017534979,0.009307759,0.9488244,0.0002666622,0.00012758696,0.000388041,0.024787448,0.006409348,0.0050841565,0.00054927904,0.003964147,0.000115762705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003626827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054338584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023857402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016570189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002148148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12617147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2110967597","doi":"10.1108/13673270910931125","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":218,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Reputation; Journal ranking; Promotion (chess); Knowledge management; Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Originality; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Library science; Social science; Qualitative research; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.021709539118081357,"score_gpt":0.27279261506465996,"score_spread":0.2510830759465786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2110967597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9048165,0.003099197,0.014947278,0.0011693843,0.0002094698,0.00046144376,0.0038211043,0.00053282623,0.07094279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97718835,0.0009032701,0.01768566,0.00010807578,0.00013613624,0.00015612875,0.0018076629,0.000050019196,0.001964776],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98997706,0.0029458927,0.0014661283,0.00065312063,0.004279315,0.00067850936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92864704,0.027337253,0.015454224,0.0031750426,0.022711242,0.0026752362],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00992869,0.00056337775,0.001013375,0.030056495,0.0009984866,0.005575038,0.0007592881,0.0003953722,0.005246471],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03534692,0.00016479542,0.0005519676,0.02635547,0.00095581065,0.0038929398,0.0019876428,0.00043718022,0.0011053592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037790593,0.00018061712,0.606982,0.0014601168,0.00038062534,0.00023777472,0.002626708,0.0027197802,0.0033935804,0.00595768,0.00702846,0.36865467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004567596,0.0008468136,0.9454817,0.00053206854,0.00023815283,0.0007700174,0.010252667,0.006224404,0.0035913994,0.006394438,0.025500795,0.000121879246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015360715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024221865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001323918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002668629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052508533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2119174046","doi":"10.1108/13673271211238797","title":"Books as a knowledge translation mechanism: citation analysis and author survey","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Originality; Knowledge management; Intellectual capital; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Sociology; Library science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.0648433909018335,"score_gpt":0.28987445582579924,"score_spread":0.22503106492396574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2119174046","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98242617,0.0020080842,0.001697246,0.00038725336,0.000034409128,0.00036034983,0.0044078473,0.000064859814,0.008613779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873236,0.0015596687,0.0032974195,0.00012550403,0.00007268252,0.00057676766,0.0038389897,0.00004295022,0.0031623784],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97595793,0.007901479,0.004673867,0.001438588,0.009312463,0.00071575085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6455438,0.22538264,0.066990525,0.009220674,0.050267335,0.0025950007],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01650908,0.00028177336,0.0010107543,0.036129862,0.0012869702,0.005516293,0.0010968654,0.00096012774,0.004561757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15152444,0.0003434475,0.0004955603,0.052772556,0.0013049496,0.0058834665,0.0019076822,0.0006370006,0.0018942306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001612683,0.00023634905,0.9150298,0.0007435858,0.00010960457,0.00018106982,0.011098072,0.00035721573,0.0002640353,0.0017128884,0.0034299677,0.066676244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030030229,0.000401715,0.925962,0.00064125314,0.0002928372,0.0010932165,0.039992932,0.004717818,0.002306809,0.0021253235,0.022325505,0.00011064432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002187658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018170686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98349094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001901804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002466483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08730942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140055463","doi":"10.1108/13673270810859569","title":"Qualified ageing workers in the knowledge management process of high‐tech businesses","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Originality; Thematic analysis; Judgement; Personal knowledge management; Process (computing); Human resource management; Knowledge value chain; Business; Organizational learning; Computer science; Sociology; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.031552204988100956,"score_gpt":0.275197697766263,"score_spread":0.24364549277816205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140055463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9893255,0.0005203134,0.00053035986,0.00091466843,0.00001564537,0.000046797442,0.00001429639,0.0000051351003,0.008627218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761593,0.00016778643,0.00024885117,0.000105533145,0.0000039514193,0.000007794579,0.0000103847215,0.0000015205745,0.0018382774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578863,0.0018443333,0.0002797983,0.00026642,0.0010520024,0.0007688772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98520374,0.0054878574,0.0025519663,0.00080529344,0.0028712624,0.0030797801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069533437,0.0001378372,0.00020850163,0.0013287991,0.0042626304,0.004594132,0.00078829675,0.00083864725,0.0019721743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01660729,0.00016126,0.00017467703,0.0009646707,0.004511272,0.0020653964,0.0031421024,0.0007688111,0.00031206373],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011629283,0.00018248676,0.12149542,0.00027650618,0.000019100962,0.001197997,0.79664516,0.00019323936,0.0008465225,0.005894578,0.0013532192,0.07177957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013033528,0.00020839174,0.16503386,0.00038522997,0.00002071777,0.0006843361,0.80129766,0.00034818266,0.00046296374,0.002989525,0.028505355,0.000050736253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.070085235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0915944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070085235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005657577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015593885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13935459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2147698887","doi":"10.1108/13673271011059545","title":"Beyond the ba: managing enabling contexts in knowledge organizations","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":136,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Originality; Computer science; Personal knowledge management; Context (archaeology); Knowledge value chain; Process (computing); Value (mathematics); Organizational learning; Sociology; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.013397005402547209,"score_gpt":0.2995906099375076,"score_spread":0.28619360453496034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2147698887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31438014,0.011032757,0.1998602,0.02775261,0.00059748685,0.0006062974,0.0002153087,0.000747157,0.44480798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97715956,0.0018335112,0.017475892,0.000415987,0.00008777597,0.0001925234,0.000043382857,0.00004922217,0.0027420719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98635536,0.009372594,0.0005847933,0.0009453729,0.0012619002,0.001480002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96962386,0.01894249,0.002954431,0.0038095892,0.0021514904,0.0025181626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011792759,0.000628173,0.00072042085,0.005404413,0.009098479,0.018391848,0.0016753959,0.0023754158,0.0051330887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025827818,0.00064283743,0.0008184353,0.0041929693,0.025705913,0.028893443,0.017859867,0.002854818,0.00086406514],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006328448,0.00006741592,0.004740304,0.000624941,0.000029912893,0.0009287214,0.049879402,0.0012696731,0.0011005772,0.88808364,0.0015738646,0.051638264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030289511,0.00010944036,0.0040302468,0.0013670637,0.000058446512,0.0008296961,0.09209891,0.0023604461,0.0014269856,0.7153523,0.18225983,0.000076439144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034362776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003414711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018391848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037281215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010857877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062366843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148125661","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2013-0166","title":"Meta-analysis of scientometric research of knowledge management: discovering the identity of the discipline","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientometrics; Originality; Publication; Knowledge management; Productivity; Empirical research; Data science; Regional science; Library science; Computer science; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.15105807998823234,"score_gpt":0.3595108145514688,"score_spread":0.20845273456323649,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148125661","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.121720865,0.7535647,0.09251555,0.006899157,0.0031484072,0.003932611,0.009339848,0.0007670033,0.008111892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8354775,0.0830979,0.06626836,0.0021367962,0.0014730409,0.005008317,0.0053042546,0.00039968587,0.00083409884],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.74895304,0.17166288,0.035906326,0.015242997,0.0269484,0.0012863885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3484204,0.52553535,0.047055963,0.04530795,0.031440668,0.0022396634],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17032732,0.0032085977,0.011035698,0.07388382,0.0022215892,0.013013439,0.004457156,0.002708615,0.0029899434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4390207,0.0017788514,0.026194798,0.06392287,0.003051172,0.009014157,0.0059523303,0.0026191208,0.00043284288],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011746202,0.00012437825,0.1202026,0.12612747,0.637538,0.00046915648,0.004980086,0.0024081192,0.00086239504,0.0064587207,0.003813595,0.09584089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047691702,0.0012120997,0.099859685,0.084052235,0.7276519,0.0012641195,0.008015486,0.006887784,0.0028580953,0.038726978,0.028481264,0.0005135009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037676822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00497826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92611617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062373974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010273134,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9007877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2150457675","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2014-0252","title":"What matters for knowledge sharing in collectivistic cultures? Empirical evidence from China","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":100,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Collectivism; Knowledge sharing; Context (archaeology); Knowledge value chain; Business; Empirical research; Incentive; Empirical evidence; Personal knowledge management; Psychology; Marketing; Organizational learning; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.07996289898124358,"score_gpt":0.38116562141612537,"score_spread":0.3012027224348818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2150457675","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953436,0.0009029474,0.00014644575,0.00031690887,0.000009518174,0.000026160398,0.000069490736,0.0000021788596,0.0031827108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990723,0.00050714915,0.000100089645,0.000080064,0.000005547736,0.000013718133,0.000056490495,0.0000023116306,0.00016219511],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507755,0.0016929072,0.00057003286,0.0006574592,0.0011977643,0.00080437365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9724937,0.011536428,0.008201214,0.0022608617,0.0031925724,0.0023152118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007032054,0.0004140881,0.000785395,0.0033277296,0.0036753577,0.0030774157,0.0008997665,0.00045300147,0.0029931136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012138944,0.000347949,0.00070695515,0.0053088325,0.0027453327,0.0017089694,0.0022769636,0.000685475,0.00015671166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000122003854,0.00015696621,0.9029334,0.0006243027,0.000301117,0.00066051784,0.058376327,0.00021969409,0.00037528906,0.0021338202,0.0006436885,0.033452827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014244592,0.00007931709,0.95487833,0.0003624461,0.00011030798,0.00024712915,0.040528174,0.00043749934,0.00024519523,0.0006592131,0.0024047578,0.000033418957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068969905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06105879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068969905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002546461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006584508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13713694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154262006","doi":"10.1108/13673271211238733","title":"Managing organizational memory with intergenerational knowledge transfer","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":145,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge transfer; Knowledge management; Tacit knowledge; Generalizability theory; Knowledge value chain; Context (archaeology); Explicit knowledge; Originality; Organizational learning; Empirical research; Computer science; Psychology; Creativity; Social psychology","score_opus":0.022891543836346413,"score_gpt":0.2835126527729726,"score_spread":0.2606211089366262,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154262006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83709496,0.0022764558,0.070513755,0.004345094,0.00007829834,0.00095077103,0.000038555285,0.00016792242,0.08453415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9833039,0.00045511773,0.014603315,0.00011340986,0.000016644695,0.0001708228,0.000014662469,0.0000089239575,0.0013130349],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909689,0.0066233743,0.0002886642,0.0004105082,0.0008476071,0.0008609008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97544426,0.014535565,0.0030023751,0.0045071547,0.0014305272,0.0010800647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009397978,0.0004883208,0.00032229602,0.0024238578,0.0032736033,0.0069441246,0.001970738,0.001546566,0.002823316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026134823,0.00024899075,0.00039522146,0.0015330535,0.004845113,0.008113285,0.009560316,0.00097031664,0.00038427138],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014667145,0.0012652234,0.050487816,0.0011741143,0.000111135174,0.0013953506,0.10929053,0.0033490653,0.0024989434,0.061589308,0.0017503438,0.7669415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016893307,0.002292198,0.060857885,0.003873503,0.0003366953,0.0040388624,0.5316811,0.016143907,0.011946111,0.24767065,0.12079251,0.00019768215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073870836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012708385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009397978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020878848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004847118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04970187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155973496","doi":"10.1108/13673270710752090","title":"The moderating role of human capital management practices on employee capabilities","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":121,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Structural equation modeling; Human resource management; Job satisfaction; Knowledge management; Psychology; Human capital; Originality; Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.02050094257113728,"score_gpt":0.272772721523782,"score_spread":0.25227177895264474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155973496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9918114,0.0002992344,0.0043006046,0.00040987332,0.00001595864,0.00007480503,0.00007915421,0.000022860526,0.0029860795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980118,0.000088355126,0.0015629964,0.00003600844,0.000006378889,0.000039408726,0.00002405428,0.0000025542174,0.00022825375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.996079,0.0023407554,0.00019358241,0.0004728424,0.00048334652,0.00043037682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93688834,0.050094742,0.007863774,0.0025241917,0.0012380991,0.0013907517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006261277,0.00061454927,0.00043353913,0.0007795395,0.00056732196,0.0017211557,0.00057842024,0.000625597,0.0047091073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027860388,0.00030935273,0.0007168794,0.00057652494,0.0010409466,0.001658137,0.002147234,0.0009379458,0.00022774671],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043398628,0.0006592977,0.93800116,0.000285591,0.0005170738,0.00024899453,0.004065945,0.0038075584,0.0018668835,0.0076682544,0.00020890597,0.042236395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007762313,0.0020633233,0.94971186,0.0005705208,0.0010345854,0.0003354002,0.0054958174,0.021857565,0.0056627574,0.009638233,0.003484698,0.00006768545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020165269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002350095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006261277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010573519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024306225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03311318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160168127","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2013-0494","title":"Knowledge-centered culture and knowledge sharing: the moderator role of trust propensity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Moderation; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Originality; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Association (psychology); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.03604670583397745,"score_gpt":0.2923635970994431,"score_spread":0.25631689126546564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160168127","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99795794,0.00010134915,0.0004381226,0.00016652967,0.000007147133,0.000020614143,0.000017149348,0.0000033491262,0.0012877644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996859,0.00002593629,0.00015652762,0.000022926688,0.0000023771386,0.000008902125,0.0000069045172,0.0000010694635,0.00008951285],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249613,0.004600216,0.0005228451,0.0006402504,0.0009759916,0.00076455885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9334216,0.04093123,0.0138400635,0.0042238394,0.0025324763,0.005050713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056254566,0.00025712483,0.00043988696,0.00079227024,0.0012441173,0.0023470738,0.0004920065,0.0006127009,0.0030388404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030534515,0.00023478543,0.00061336346,0.00073987787,0.00140476,0.0010684003,0.0024560133,0.0010831559,0.00014409599],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041334995,0.0007928145,0.96625125,0.00012887949,0.0004059376,0.00014498632,0.011251344,0.00021343623,0.0010389555,0.001098836,0.00012999254,0.018130092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043630993,0.0008017995,0.9770379,0.00017429162,0.00031750294,0.00022171895,0.015847215,0.0015889468,0.0009386286,0.0020384092,0.0009558206,0.000034230456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037825457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035744845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0056254566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011114373,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002524955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029750586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2160904960","doi":"10.1108/13673270810852458","title":"The effect of tacit knowledge on firm performance","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":203,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Balanced scorecard; Knowledge management; Originality; Business; Sample (material); Value (mathematics); Metric (unit); Index (typography); Explicit knowledge; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Marketing; Psychology; Creativity; Data mining","score_opus":0.013958084442923253,"score_gpt":0.226933813213748,"score_spread":0.21297572877082474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2160904960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98564756,0.00048965536,0.0011889976,0.0003033455,0.000011370417,0.00003993248,0.00013379668,0.000028028382,0.012157264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993759,0.00008019441,0.00018750092,0.000015152542,0.00000957151,0.0000060450525,0.000044526623,0.0000023606663,0.00027881848],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289364,0.001489949,0.00047035096,0.0005106003,0.0037709319,0.00086456555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8677176,0.069136254,0.03922171,0.0052201785,0.011244547,0.0074596717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005668521,0.00043734923,0.00042229847,0.00273112,0.00071594986,0.0044825696,0.00088949164,0.00072038546,0.0023179187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04661463,0.00012672725,0.00036731176,0.0026642086,0.0016529976,0.0028107332,0.0020544268,0.0010726005,0.00040334847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003156392,0.0010051754,0.88528746,0.0002481557,0.00034876555,0.0003268065,0.0012557715,0.007583795,0.0012072652,0.002132806,0.0005203867,0.099767946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013886772,0.0007352225,0.986479,0.00012768176,0.00007340892,0.00012227886,0.001358615,0.006527033,0.0014595733,0.002216784,0.0008411668,0.000045310626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009180312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002449721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002304623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029978335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2168631559","doi":"10.1108/13673270610709198","title":"Where is the knowledge we have lost in managers?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Personal Information Management and User Behavior","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Sample (material); Knowledge management; Psychology; Population; Anxiety; Value (mathematics); USable; Tacit knowledge; Computer science; Social psychology; Creativity; Sociology","score_opus":0.13915624865939197,"score_gpt":0.4022741468965934,"score_spread":0.26311789823720144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2168631559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95991766,0.005499945,0.0025864057,0.015736664,0.000212091,0.0000342748,0.000054341835,0.00004003608,0.01591864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99690896,0.00076306553,0.0003516093,0.00097567274,0.00006375277,0.000009100877,0.000013918996,0.000004896723,0.00090899906],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418074,0.002080042,0.000277152,0.00048878865,0.0015812358,0.0013919481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721256,0.0073914016,0.009755664,0.0012428178,0.0029715747,0.0065129837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00601895,0.00037189774,0.0004964534,0.0021086622,0.0038513588,0.009971817,0.0011018703,0.001334683,0.0024055543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025213096,0.00029448452,0.00044609245,0.0014097334,0.009939646,0.0070398054,0.003335577,0.0021789852,0.00039071968],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005330102,0.0004992672,0.5602831,0.0008282642,0.00039246722,0.002372452,0.20942356,0.00044031002,0.0026922491,0.023124067,0.009309943,0.19010128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053801832,0.0010611526,0.33559132,0.0008942224,0.00019173604,0.0030742828,0.5791587,0.00065072876,0.0015566361,0.038133036,0.039455045,0.00017930524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051044077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004236696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009971817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003467135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036831344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031831622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171108411","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2014-0256","title":"Interorganisational partnerships and knowledge sharing: the perspective of non-profit organisations (NPOs)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; General partnership; Knowledge management; Business; Social media; Public relations; Value (mathematics); Originality; Sociology; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.053347563981951895,"score_gpt":0.3344772969259764,"score_spread":0.2811297329440245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171108411","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7246362,0.0046627894,0.013305441,0.036767434,0.00016412766,0.00022288879,0.00007482776,0.00003512576,0.22013116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99473673,0.00082347373,0.0010626797,0.00048420305,0.000013014959,0.000036111553,0.000011774631,0.000006887733,0.0028251153],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97766805,0.016318996,0.00041259528,0.0007145663,0.0021197803,0.0027660541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98390317,0.009736075,0.001866777,0.0007696388,0.0010840986,0.0026401454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009922679,0.00037113755,0.0004253695,0.002493616,0.0168479,0.016372902,0.00183815,0.0028464387,0.0033111381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012334044,0.00033358013,0.00026326868,0.004171421,0.029925523,0.012961702,0.015683783,0.0029049541,0.00026159754],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029962004,0.000055229877,0.007357207,0.00020183012,0.000011323247,0.0013925316,0.82245225,0.0002813726,0.00045530015,0.14772964,0.0009797384,0.019053651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038486846,0.000025238303,0.002038368,0.00019319523,0.0000043543364,0.00041153433,0.92463195,0.00021562354,0.0000931475,0.026990904,0.045377262,0.000014620775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04773304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059807483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04773304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015873553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027932288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115171194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230110439","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2014-0512","title":"Knowledge needs in the non-profit sector: an evidence-based model of organizational practices","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Originality; Qualitative property; Knowledge value chain; Situated; Descriptive statistics; Business; Qualitative research; Organizational learning; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.11895381651045671,"score_gpt":0.3723404964456276,"score_spread":0.2533866799351709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230110439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8983754,0.013323968,0.012942941,0.028230336,0.000086720065,0.0016638641,0.00046459737,0.000049621794,0.044862617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926974,0.0024730652,0.0037411929,0.000558598,0.0000055090522,0.00021381592,0.00007924071,0.000005136231,0.0002258889],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9658908,0.01774123,0.003344453,0.0018076019,0.009509068,0.0017068009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75671935,0.19250774,0.01883563,0.0059957346,0.021928119,0.0040134075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046698585,0.0005594213,0.0008991396,0.012723402,0.0038967507,0.010144618,0.0031215989,0.0021880309,0.002093411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10498856,0.0006747362,0.0010299643,0.009336985,0.012189619,0.011553254,0.0066930195,0.0022321895,0.0002532732],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020511975,0.0009174656,0.3343077,0.012416381,0.00039305733,0.001570724,0.43427235,0.0017791184,0.00029242752,0.04150859,0.0017888295,0.17054825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007435179,0.00032879182,0.15445954,0.024987943,0.00045922806,0.0009744823,0.7622687,0.0038479692,0.0004650884,0.035760026,0.016277147,0.00009669246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10751478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12207721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10751478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027215967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049826033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24696869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492209886","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2015-0394","title":"Negotiate, reciprocate, or cooperate? The impact of exchange modes on inter-employee knowledge sharing","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":82,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Social exchange theory; Negotiation; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Reciprocal; Affect (linguistics); Knowledge value chain; Business; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Originality; Organizational learning; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0782807598293501,"score_gpt":0.3719554055005187,"score_spread":0.29367464567116863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492209886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934856,0.00013533053,0.0007238401,0.00037978098,0.0000069307034,0.000019889198,0.000009328265,0.0000048445886,0.005234384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99955493,0.000049861977,0.00022088538,0.000022078566,0.0000031648065,0.0000093934095,0.0000043818677,0.0000015229924,0.00013366518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862918,0.010217498,0.00049315434,0.0006477413,0.0013104121,0.00103952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89677143,0.07861325,0.01442946,0.00410235,0.002175536,0.0039079585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011274549,0.00023851873,0.00023955139,0.00071760704,0.001462968,0.0038896406,0.0005445064,0.00085533364,0.0037927923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06225235,0.0002464144,0.00038507648,0.00046792958,0.0028271677,0.003307681,0.002913149,0.0011014359,0.0002831006],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009261321,0.00081385835,0.8195478,0.00029974946,0.0002606122,0.00043037237,0.05937268,0.0010722859,0.0017998215,0.0101100495,0.00046038156,0.10490644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012247685,0.0010087121,0.7968962,0.00049017236,0.00031998724,0.0007422659,0.16363059,0.006308619,0.0016576579,0.024653729,0.004044711,0.00012480047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011397674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013025295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011274549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008518955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016058137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05962622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2507132064","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2016-0203","title":"Understanding counterproductive knowledge behavior: antecedents and consequences of intra-organizational knowledge hiding","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":515,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge value chain; Organizational learning; Knowledge worker; Body of knowledge; Personal knowledge management; Knowledge economy; Business; Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.0857896919783409,"score_gpt":0.3291235540236057,"score_spread":0.2433338620452648,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2507132064","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99746394,0.00008558408,0.00072942296,0.00014766718,0.0000013289962,0.000021000458,0.000015761803,0.000003958424,0.0015312738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946934,0.000038035338,0.00037361504,0.000011675738,0.000001315165,0.000009906509,0.000014854464,6.5265965e-7,0.00008071932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99763656,0.00107074,0.00020541115,0.00026526165,0.0005149577,0.0003071354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9486573,0.031007383,0.014056364,0.0031328115,0.0017720754,0.001374136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033231843,0.00029724688,0.00029105827,0.0012564611,0.0006790872,0.002190143,0.0006566688,0.00073985563,0.0019534605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017395174,0.0002580101,0.0003722952,0.0007676028,0.0020803607,0.0020604196,0.00162532,0.000805014,0.00009612239],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011537341,0.000891319,0.96884,0.00014122762,0.00006960983,0.00019028808,0.007845845,0.0007833818,0.0007280991,0.0018941187,0.000060503968,0.018440215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015383828,0.0002966155,0.96730405,0.00021173243,0.000088354,0.00027584002,0.01801044,0.005046709,0.0013197132,0.00651851,0.0008905448,0.000022091132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038064863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00493443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0038064863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001198533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023962555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017574906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525271897","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2015-0385","title":"Knowledge transfer in knowledge-intensive organizations: the crucial role of improvisation in transferring and protecting knowledge","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":135,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Improvisation; Knowledge management; Knowledge transfer; Knowledge value chain; Procedural knowledge; Organizational learning; Personal knowledge management; Originality; Computer science; Storytelling; Knowledge integration; Context (archaeology); Body of knowledge; Knowledge engineering; Psychology; Social psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.011910540853614236,"score_gpt":0.22540265422077763,"score_spread":0.2134921133671634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525271897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96647894,0.00036156012,0.013771717,0.0015526374,0.00001858531,0.00010607933,0.000010198353,0.00004385247,0.017656399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981431,0.00006583657,0.001375089,0.00006282481,0.0000038281632,0.000031962492,0.0000038570734,0.0000041993057,0.00030931894],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874564,0.008457413,0.0004274348,0.0008713801,0.0017090986,0.00107832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8727679,0.098514006,0.014039778,0.008366366,0.0028562245,0.0034557057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009741213,0.00040449057,0.0003825708,0.0012078069,0.002226568,0.0051490627,0.0015423519,0.0018258446,0.004938822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061162885,0.00031641248,0.0003565683,0.0008153201,0.009724631,0.0055742767,0.0068825646,0.0017096497,0.0004125037],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017266865,0.0041413903,0.15003547,0.0033978494,0.00029068973,0.00173512,0.28563628,0.0058829654,0.018761909,0.07646595,0.0008832265,0.45104247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029348154,0.004010478,0.30700615,0.0028197516,0.0003493797,0.0014739421,0.353883,0.016510708,0.03821971,0.2533254,0.021866418,0.00024158787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011194545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008446182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009741213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023823811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043408587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05151707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593464539","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2016-0173","title":"Means-ends based know-how mapping","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Computer science; Originality; Need to know; Modularity (biology); Resource (disambiguation); Linkage (software); Value (mathematics); Usability; Data science; Human–computer interaction; Qualitative research; Sociology","score_opus":0.051375170004750365,"score_gpt":0.3569490393028268,"score_spread":0.3055738692980764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593464539","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007989641,0.000368648,0.90883696,0.0011971496,0.0001515022,0.00048229308,0.00040675726,0.001653899,0.07891314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16486509,0.0006746122,0.8120687,0.00036844783,0.000056702982,0.0008903001,0.0010295799,0.00065959594,0.019387038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98302066,0.00850196,0.00092762185,0.002454812,0.004416001,0.0006789106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9790323,0.0105389105,0.0009150973,0.006099698,0.002919372,0.00049462734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010173552,0.001750991,0.0009920865,0.004184564,0.0033634575,0.013258239,0.003600435,0.0036903992,0.021335548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025551502,0.0010984255,0.0026161042,0.004045823,0.0051979194,0.013006637,0.011643645,0.0032832357,0.006428778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020987864,0.0002629082,0.0024076237,0.0014510375,0.00015940693,0.00080114836,0.014350593,0.020376222,0.004225731,0.65721834,0.006823659,0.29171345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042353062,0.00012584943,0.0009388788,0.0009752116,0.000111570655,0.0007233758,0.007829021,0.042622898,0.015178573,0.6223355,0.30898347,0.00013328399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030760071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033475347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021335548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028768731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00567631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071374476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2594035967","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2016-0300","title":"Citation classics published in knowledge management journals. Part III: author survey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Serendipity; Citation; Originality; Luck; Value (mathematics); Computer science; Perspective (graphical); Citation analysis; Sociology; Epistemology; Knowledge management; Social science; Library science; Qualitative research; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0713316986651997,"score_gpt":0.3090176294564667,"score_spread":0.237685930791267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594035967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90360713,0.017988222,0.0026726727,0.002402172,0.0006262897,0.00085012,0.04675038,0.00050421717,0.024598744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92099476,0.01407898,0.008271362,0.0010765357,0.0011841508,0.0015492743,0.028486421,0.0001892976,0.024169259],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912587,0.0013039537,0.0020471816,0.00089456205,0.0040862947,0.00040934305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8888392,0.048029054,0.030380419,0.0025219657,0.026559643,0.003669767],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007539231,0.00039290698,0.00082315155,0.03837895,0.0011636019,0.0040877922,0.0006399314,0.0006942258,0.009351503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056597073,0.0003597711,0.00046206763,0.052958503,0.000633824,0.0032267757,0.0015727046,0.00040101743,0.0042993203],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033482994,0.00018202754,0.6470999,0.0050805737,0.00020663004,0.0005446194,0.012003191,0.00028445534,0.0021926342,0.002474214,0.04602812,0.2835688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003727396,0.00037800457,0.8288517,0.0011583957,0.00014886823,0.0020696947,0.017022751,0.00080440193,0.0024864313,0.0015405996,0.14541818,0.00008387033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013079528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00196342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013498064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001913149,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039871752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597920650","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2016-0113","title":"Knowledge management, problem solving and performance in top Italian firms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":130,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Generalizability theory; Knowledge management; Originality; Context (archaeology); Extant taxon; Empirical research; Computer science; Test (biology); Value (mathematics); Empirical evidence; Organizational learning; Creativity; Management science; Economics; Mathematics; Psychology","score_opus":0.020682495724878083,"score_gpt":0.2508747555013092,"score_spread":0.23019225977643115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597920650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9961339,0.0002472849,0.000055330627,0.00013340398,0.0000016155604,0.000011463432,0.000027826922,0.000003637744,0.0033855692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996388,0.00008382464,0.000060509145,0.000013676886,0.00000385156,0.000004556148,0.000027913302,5.060894e-7,0.00016630806],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855703,0.00045408495,0.00008411988,0.00013011221,0.00039028886,0.00038429402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98478967,0.005761415,0.0065588052,0.0007183759,0.00091487943,0.0012568237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024601861,0.00024971395,0.00023001275,0.0019784237,0.00066083943,0.0029403693,0.00035953897,0.0004508817,0.0018173307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010944464,0.000091976784,0.00017235811,0.0026845913,0.00094561273,0.00074069685,0.00087734376,0.00032978939,0.00027953964],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009844057,0.0004935321,0.95342493,0.0001241937,0.00005769813,0.00013632533,0.003824042,0.0009306759,0.00029158941,0.0007314094,0.0005806042,0.0393067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008515606,0.00012013336,0.9962238,0.000030767325,0.000011664946,0.000039787028,0.0019661065,0.0005384335,0.00010657588,0.00029481712,0.00065216346,0.0000073582883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013491954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012584173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013491954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021819116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016397708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026826859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600698132","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2016-0183","title":"A two-sided matching decision method for supply and demand of technological knowledge","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":59,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Computer science; Knowledge management; Supply and demand; Value (mathematics); Optimal matching; Originality; Tacit knowledge; Machine learning; Microeconomics; Economics; Psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.018405777663389945,"score_gpt":0.30908724940019877,"score_spread":0.2906814717368088,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600698132","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020908631,0.00014063338,0.97190374,0.00048714076,0.00005131947,0.00044111127,0.00017091045,0.00012890693,0.0057676104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61882406,0.00035443585,0.36963955,0.00021618573,0.000098627934,0.0014130878,0.00031571233,0.00008167151,0.0090567125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99120855,0.005527739,0.0003327515,0.0015154246,0.00089469214,0.00052085595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9837766,0.013160945,0.001077129,0.0006266783,0.0008326886,0.00052598503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012211577,0.001400139,0.0024613158,0.0026394199,0.0011215396,0.004207199,0.0036347483,0.0040790676,0.020938165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025975853,0.001260679,0.0033432818,0.0026213275,0.0020450163,0.0068285326,0.003450566,0.0035278746,0.0017024437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062366435,0.0004506385,0.005005977,0.00051468017,0.00029213002,0.0006093805,0.0010991199,0.42542997,0.0015799743,0.4761492,0.0019967074,0.086248495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006336147,0.000144136,0.00043916487,0.00003129127,0.000051996554,0.00008704438,0.00012152723,0.89110464,0.0002336156,0.10627043,0.0014102709,0.000042578533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028549805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018795979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020938165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032380032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029753097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07004511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621565102","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2016-0229","title":"Non-profit organizations’ use of tools and technologies for knowledge management: a comparative study","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Knowledge management; Qualitative property; Popularity; Descriptive statistics; Data collection; Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Business; Qualitative research; Computer science; Marketing; Sociology; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.12929265884608568,"score_gpt":0.38144922107104023,"score_spread":0.25215656222495453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621565102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99207485,0.0005419207,0.00013032331,0.00028198148,0.0000060763996,0.00003964268,0.000021535148,0.0000023371044,0.006901297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864703,0.0005778283,0.00014435392,0.00007547144,0.0000043103396,0.000030019093,0.000017795532,0.0000020399923,0.0005011558],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98785084,0.0060931467,0.0005756104,0.00058602914,0.0026239245,0.0022704082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9619503,0.022299187,0.005071824,0.0010732656,0.00596677,0.0036386685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00933508,0.00023216185,0.0004892577,0.005345299,0.0066016475,0.0062604323,0.0009787024,0.00090788875,0.0021966395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023150155,0.00025058736,0.00020301755,0.0064680073,0.0035793723,0.0046764216,0.0047817645,0.000751658,0.00022360476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011001535,0.0003424402,0.12248271,0.00047372983,0.00002277699,0.0011472492,0.83027655,0.0000441538,0.00046410126,0.0025313862,0.0004456593,0.041659202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038627873,0.00010584481,0.06999455,0.00018154192,0.0000078232815,0.0002043086,0.9246718,0.000043487864,0.00007700146,0.0001293572,0.0045724367,0.0000079207775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05389072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.109590255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05389072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075567514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009854303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10715407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623725241","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2016-0273","title":"Capturing knowledge from lessons learned at the work package level in project engineering teams","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Experiential learning; Computer science; Project management; Knowledge management; Process (computing); Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Work breakdown structure; Project planning; Engineering management; Process management; OPM3; Engineering; Systems engineering","score_opus":0.22579948603522296,"score_gpt":0.4136156167442664,"score_spread":0.18781613070904343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623725241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8875413,0.00039667203,0.08836762,0.0006531156,0.000039623475,0.00091813656,0.00035191237,0.00022538236,0.021506213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9381293,0.00035351078,0.056788016,0.00013940752,0.000015067518,0.0006369378,0.0005348254,0.00004898745,0.0033539033],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947345,0.0029606535,0.00026387654,0.0006448479,0.0010251559,0.0003710695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98351026,0.009829437,0.0018035369,0.0017387612,0.002368846,0.0007491907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00509878,0.0005248509,0.00032950466,0.002948431,0.0010692292,0.0044045853,0.0012318341,0.0010833638,0.0016584022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028205613,0.000452326,0.00043954182,0.0018022569,0.0013679119,0.004625514,0.0037775484,0.0013092965,0.00062565546],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002975403,0.0015436991,0.08819077,0.001380519,0.000096690834,0.0013611816,0.23103464,0.007027787,0.0071209124,0.007213291,0.0032176613,0.6515153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015852603,0.004932487,0.3241706,0.005367313,0.00028001756,0.0018392621,0.42231286,0.057747804,0.025786478,0.057983883,0.09893392,0.00048689276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027800102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045525986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00509878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023229534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031074155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0269652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751652115","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2017-0018","title":"Linking procedural memory with organizational learning through knowledge corridors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambidexterity; Vision; Knowledge management; Perception; Originality; Organizational memory; Organizational learning; Computer science; Empirical research; Psychology; Creativity; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.020605384507178696,"score_gpt":0.25538814958848005,"score_spread":0.23478276508130136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751652115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9814605,0.00017814287,0.00572129,0.00027033346,0.0000053725325,0.000044930537,0.000035632343,0.000042495143,0.012241298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978236,0.0000479002,0.0017119362,0.000018308683,0.0000025952554,0.000013959097,0.000017866016,0.000003603461,0.00036035592],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862194,0.0004950714,0.000090496455,0.00023671494,0.00035058818,0.00020523927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781662,0.011551108,0.0060386434,0.0020728097,0.0011164191,0.001054723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001895901,0.0002721279,0.00024305412,0.001250438,0.00057217205,0.0039584874,0.0007826832,0.0006050195,0.0037146553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01764681,0.00024021992,0.00036406872,0.0009671038,0.0024811022,0.003609314,0.003210126,0.0010006159,0.00017286272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011849882,0.0024840632,0.42645678,0.0011303388,0.00033265553,0.0013276365,0.046889916,0.010687787,0.017501578,0.038428783,0.00087086874,0.45270464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013400782,0.0031039182,0.83891004,0.00062740047,0.00026541748,0.0014770265,0.040700912,0.01249344,0.0103677735,0.082896754,0.008831533,0.00019181405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001410372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016588492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0039584874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009510865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001377854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012426734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752153172","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2017-0025","title":"Are winemaker consultants just another source of knowledge for innovation?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Wine Industry and Tourism","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Business; Marketing; Winery; Value (mathematics); Affect (linguistics); Knowledge management; Wine; Psychology; Creativity; Computer science","score_opus":0.06441914198711428,"score_gpt":0.3060649525866958,"score_spread":0.2416458105995815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752153172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9156674,0.0032200902,0.0016260615,0.0072675585,0.000057759105,0.000055986755,0.00011567194,0.000033274973,0.07195622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960537,0.000836138,0.00038052548,0.0003373229,0.000028218634,0.000008516378,0.000034432604,0.000006103924,0.0023149068],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99336606,0.002022919,0.0001877198,0.0005629379,0.0023703838,0.0014900353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.944439,0.028134614,0.011736201,0.0019564067,0.00691795,0.0068158405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046506072,0.00032803434,0.0005108835,0.0025184515,0.0028019235,0.008378484,0.0011886808,0.0013690582,0.0063868924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03384179,0.00022181892,0.00036534804,0.0031312318,0.0036982165,0.004017676,0.0026241902,0.0009778794,0.00053085526],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030336645,0.00040273403,0.7535908,0.0007229529,0.00028082833,0.0023294,0.034277502,0.0009423878,0.0017419766,0.022109492,0.0042400234,0.17905846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007884138,0.00021065351,0.80398935,0.0014615079,0.0004731798,0.001565594,0.11598753,0.0022341628,0.0018978425,0.014603786,0.057360426,0.00013714872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18608789,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30834216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18608789,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008585603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018181367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37000948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788184301","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2017-0111","title":"Communities of practice to improve public health outcomes: a systematic review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Health Policy Implementation Science","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Workforce; Rigour; Public health; Public relations; Systematic review; Inclusion (mineral); Population health; Originality; Knowledge management; Medical education; Business; Psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science; MEDLINE; Nursing; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.7189612023493882,"score_gpt":0.7101519181129243,"score_spread":0.008809284236463877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788184301","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014103804,0.9937236,0.000468308,0.0009388284,0.0003216337,0.002015438,0.00026388853,0.000023208013,0.00083474535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023754796,0.96870416,0.0031565723,0.0009129256,0.00015047171,0.0030153852,0.00017264174,0.000011070181,0.00012206902],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629237,0.019041238,0.008392068,0.0016754996,0.0070182234,0.00094926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8853757,0.08652315,0.015395685,0.0018038257,0.009051252,0.0018504251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027956039,0.001578026,0.006434498,0.016246453,0.0016997852,0.00577132,0.0026518991,0.0029458923,0.006111249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11979717,0.0011325091,0.006996013,0.014358939,0.0018575541,0.00529686,0.0036552951,0.0026017595,0.0004482626],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013964016,0.00009106729,0.0010012265,0.88461477,0.0038199245,0.00007112946,0.00085673213,0.00014504543,0.00005828473,0.0007280761,0.002139645,0.10633449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019214136,0.00013639346,0.0015337893,0.977102,0.0072894013,0.00010983064,0.00062219944,0.000059472233,0.000067255016,0.0003891848,0.012475114,0.000023178916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011080517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028815335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027956039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008107857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04817631,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14784741},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789063361","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2016-0457","title":"The effects of knowledge creation process on organizational performance using the BSC approach: the mediating role of intellectual capital","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Balanced scorecard; Structural equation modeling; Organizational performance; Business; Competitive advantage; Extant taxon; Leverage (statistics); Knowledge sharing; Structural capital; Organizational learning; Process management; Computer science; Human capital; Marketing; Financial capital","score_opus":0.010133245637927656,"score_gpt":0.23172137348332,"score_spread":0.22158812784539234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789063361","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979957,0.0004314916,0.0020083978,0.00071875117,0.0000220091,0.00013851366,0.00007877299,0.000024097924,0.01662106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989479,0.000094940304,0.0006039555,0.000025485328,0.000007934356,0.00003930075,0.000021502507,0.0000026863129,0.00025628286],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934936,0.00363695,0.0003110593,0.00044115967,0.0013469837,0.0007703701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92751163,0.050643742,0.011181119,0.002542545,0.0039432733,0.004177732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061266012,0.0008147551,0.0005024303,0.0027977165,0.0015978515,0.0041479,0.0008673956,0.0009729675,0.00448208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02891627,0.00019432003,0.0007650611,0.0024086414,0.0025618563,0.0031799993,0.0031472791,0.0012882862,0.000353053],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010526289,0.0029766033,0.81235707,0.0009583107,0.0006520388,0.0007450317,0.014686882,0.008325788,0.002116641,0.018500173,0.0008526399,0.1367761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012343221,0.0015822165,0.94003266,0.00060412067,0.0005852627,0.00025501754,0.01666044,0.021299647,0.0024593235,0.013953141,0.0023531257,0.00009161608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006020539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050649773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061266012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032384065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005796173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032400906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792157346","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0359","title":"Strategic knowledge management and enterprise social media","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Originality; Strategic management; Computer science; Business; Marketing; Sociology","score_opus":0.02815283283741228,"score_gpt":0.2511055698298954,"score_spread":0.22295273699248314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792157346","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56926554,0.003352893,0.013196344,0.015341172,0.00018496603,0.00021102291,0.0004040234,0.00013528469,0.39790875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962166,0.00045725287,0.0011218722,0.00017839327,0.00005896187,0.00002941481,0.00004358785,0.000006724265,0.0018871623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687374,0.0014858338,0.00015517494,0.00029049697,0.0007262947,0.00046838942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9741271,0.016012508,0.005709937,0.0014308358,0.0015525,0.0011670615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033860803,0.00029280447,0.00020290897,0.0038295665,0.0017967529,0.008384619,0.0007136012,0.0006988914,0.005594117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016796872,0.000092656745,0.0002108895,0.0047587804,0.004748572,0.0070813927,0.0035228124,0.0009167141,0.00042942108],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001401107,0.00042670936,0.10230606,0.0009626257,0.00012180507,0.0008357903,0.023579974,0.003628552,0.0010826797,0.5132954,0.0062479265,0.34737238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044295324,0.0003286227,0.14478794,0.0023140654,0.00012241452,0.0010137057,0.12950373,0.01409711,0.0038991766,0.5423871,0.16133839,0.0001633753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029580365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025676605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008384619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035383855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036093604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025672913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2803632083","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2017-0179","title":"Tell me if you can: time pressure, prosocial motivation, perspective taking, and knowledge hiding","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":288,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Mainstream; Causality (physics); Field (mathematics); Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.028897671723267935,"score_gpt":0.31410200950744815,"score_spread":0.2852043377841802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2803632083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99467933,0.00054408074,0.0005841478,0.0018562365,0.000023057863,0.000015489015,0.000020899057,0.00000492504,0.002271848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984762,0.00029197268,0.00035564858,0.00037440905,0.000015611791,0.000013145432,0.0000138595515,0.0000020594787,0.00045714955],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979226,0.0011052996,0.00010418437,0.00017868291,0.00045793806,0.00023136809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97306764,0.01423427,0.00883504,0.0007147291,0.0007922383,0.002355996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002945608,0.00021334374,0.00022906381,0.00067494845,0.0018547818,0.0027518638,0.0004011138,0.0009123112,0.0028029096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017880388,0.00019063604,0.00031896663,0.00053982117,0.0022991255,0.0018789995,0.0015311649,0.0013272377,0.00025489874],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032144654,0.0010647345,0.79625976,0.00043410476,0.000248504,0.00094165147,0.09888093,0.00028126713,0.0028345059,0.0032476517,0.0024439036,0.09304149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046394707,0.00065287005,0.7956606,0.000448148,0.00020456058,0.0011565976,0.1855754,0.0011931453,0.0014107657,0.007536565,0.0060094525,0.00010547827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021809703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032441171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002945608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065260753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011273742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015578032},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804325449","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0342","title":"An agential realist perspective on the construction and flow of knowledge: the case of dynamic entanglement and “cuts” within an aircraft engine manufacturing workplace","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Knowledge management; Phenomenon; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Embodied cognition; Quantum entanglement; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01592300876555207,"score_gpt":0.3274176499316851,"score_spread":0.311494641166133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804325449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42055395,0.001824481,0.23637795,0.024142234,0.00024978005,0.000450545,0.0000965132,0.00020419202,0.31610036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98348504,0.00021016195,0.011210952,0.0003432058,0.00003545458,0.00013529613,0.000021982927,0.000041005413,0.004516885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796689,0.016560417,0.00033299476,0.0010399872,0.0013018039,0.0010959675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98198384,0.013734874,0.0012787239,0.0018372509,0.0004926715,0.00067255815],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012803922,0.00060854387,0.0005503747,0.0032367553,0.01279197,0.016114362,0.0026953572,0.004886303,0.005978723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014238358,0.0006710162,0.0007712609,0.0017141699,0.06411766,0.020070849,0.01352793,0.004376864,0.00057302916],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039038216,0.000039674655,0.0010905517,0.00009640441,0.000010459665,0.0022099041,0.36553982,0.0010196381,0.00053769443,0.6235781,0.0005124848,0.005326286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004596483,0.00009605151,0.0014329477,0.00045998002,0.000028851418,0.002055979,0.41853502,0.0059003746,0.0010084984,0.45973343,0.110630475,0.00007235193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042563286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027799637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987208,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005679629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040523764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06771445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804852660","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0325","title":"Absorption, combination and desorption: knowledge-oriented boundary spanning capacities","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Absorptive capacity; Originality; Knowledge management; Absorption capacity; Business; Value (mathematics); Boundary spanning; Tacit knowledge; Empirical research; Absorption (acoustics); Computer science; Process management; Creativity; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.016995442539834642,"score_gpt":0.23991883475731474,"score_spread":0.2229233922174801,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804852660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60778415,0.000955293,0.16943118,0.002825767,0.000030071084,0.00043626607,0.00008901979,0.00022233235,0.21822594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831441,0.00014110931,0.015071517,0.000076481716,0.000007703105,0.000080868514,0.000020375577,0.0000081818835,0.0014496292],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512154,0.0023061319,0.00028857277,0.00057046127,0.001040438,0.0006727715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97914463,0.012686482,0.0030861257,0.002516208,0.0012636106,0.0013029263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00523029,0.00042149253,0.00037812837,0.003056782,0.0020452978,0.006078291,0.0016521827,0.0019738353,0.0058873054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019330308,0.00043261805,0.0007491997,0.0022914317,0.008985816,0.012543473,0.007978554,0.0012357903,0.00055333314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017921822,0.00025559476,0.020078067,0.00048692315,0.00006492903,0.0009448172,0.021214107,0.007322955,0.0051509324,0.8190176,0.0006556746,0.124629214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066788496,0.00037601075,0.015325636,0.00057959626,0.00010206177,0.0019574475,0.023908867,0.028276963,0.0045804186,0.9035511,0.021181773,0.00009333242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011387521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080001954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006078291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002035584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028949648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027660787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893498514","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2017-0389","title":"Secrets and knowledge management strategy: the role of secrecy appropriation mechanisms in realizing value from firm innovations","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Conceptualization; Appropriation; Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Originality; Computer science; Mechanism (biology); Business; Creativity; Epistemology; Computer security; Political science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.017449400544822986,"score_gpt":0.2488993587615785,"score_spread":0.2314499582167555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893498514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53121674,0.0053252126,0.16377772,0.025741858,0.00019429688,0.00038256354,0.000095463634,0.00017625492,0.27308992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931235,0.000516224,0.004841966,0.0001849865,0.000023609538,0.00004695497,0.0000074783757,0.000009601289,0.0012456563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828135,0.01076977,0.0010528162,0.0010256288,0.002865117,0.0014731799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8967782,0.06624728,0.019897461,0.011162809,0.0037869394,0.002127231],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023744207,0.0004726106,0.00042832212,0.0036979124,0.0031521074,0.013444253,0.0012790973,0.0028368577,0.0055898936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054763407,0.0005457888,0.0008623042,0.0023023195,0.018623004,0.0170019,0.007619454,0.0024987615,0.0005176081],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117819836,0.00012676197,0.017739668,0.00032922227,0.000085041,0.00043214863,0.014202248,0.0023302701,0.001795388,0.90477014,0.00059455016,0.05747668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010660546,0.00040038844,0.019304784,0.0014482085,0.00018131036,0.0009905249,0.02258499,0.008605374,0.008061171,0.89703727,0.04111188,0.0001674921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010630134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009791683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023744207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004538546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077509843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12557286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894971745","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2017-0260","title":"Unpacking knowledge management practices in China: do institution, national and organizational culture matter?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Contextualization; Knowledge management; Organizational culture; Context (archaeology); Personal knowledge management; Organizational learning; Originality; Business; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Qualitative research; Social science","score_opus":0.026129713016957493,"score_gpt":0.34099978474339016,"score_spread":0.31487007172643267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894971745","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99348575,0.0012202165,0.00045109537,0.0008126728,0.000013987635,0.000023424791,0.00008074146,0.000004374005,0.0039076824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915385,0.00036003217,0.00015777737,0.00007757802,0.000005267603,0.000010575466,0.00003963726,9.894277e-7,0.0001943888],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780685,0.0005755665,0.00029150577,0.00035550504,0.0006118252,0.00035870203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922646,0.0028735613,0.0027240093,0.0005163901,0.0009884614,0.0006330432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034150227,0.00023978148,0.0004787851,0.0025985667,0.0018149086,0.0025727996,0.0006392974,0.00033081786,0.001655832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007736398,0.00015872488,0.0002486394,0.006435111,0.002667789,0.0031084085,0.0016663244,0.00039233864,0.00007932421],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039928622,0.000066892986,0.8892462,0.00047410876,0.00013954999,0.00029922402,0.03429909,0.0005120099,0.0005032505,0.0048978245,0.00047997513,0.0690419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006031247,0.000057118847,0.95404094,0.00027115777,0.00007178452,0.00008085565,0.039459337,0.00091374427,0.00027621383,0.0021587762,0.0026419563,0.000022022476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060716283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08204441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060716283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043469467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009608395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12072575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897931383","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2018-0019","title":"The mediating role of supply chain collaboration on the relationship between information technology and innovation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supply chain; Business; Enabling; Industrial organization; Knowledge management; Product (mathematics); Product innovation; Competition (biology); Competitive advantage; New product development; Sample (material); Supply chain management; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.01997972892887239,"score_gpt":0.2566039330395841,"score_spread":0.23662420411071172,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897931383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9606447,0.0018781092,0.0043171328,0.002320297,0.00005008826,0.00014933398,0.0002167271,0.000032273292,0.030391436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99750865,0.00064015144,0.0011499381,0.00007370206,0.000021752634,0.00005004406,0.00003661812,0.0000038182757,0.00051533803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157274,0.005031344,0.0005275288,0.000742928,0.0010685549,0.001056915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8790681,0.09481366,0.01502031,0.002301262,0.0041173473,0.0046793926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005773701,0.00056030473,0.0006297811,0.00288653,0.0019771077,0.004894239,0.00077444286,0.0012243686,0.015367015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041073784,0.00033260777,0.0011501209,0.003339301,0.0022636985,0.0036291764,0.005519493,0.0012714337,0.0005882515],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005326438,0.0011273038,0.86065847,0.0012105386,0.000718478,0.00183975,0.016530784,0.0044644405,0.0015363458,0.042820677,0.0010130723,0.06754751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028360475,0.0016516312,0.8394206,0.0037018762,0.0021963902,0.0016235597,0.04811177,0.01562038,0.0035372954,0.06851773,0.015184924,0.00015018873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047578095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031696695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015367015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020451867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067684245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051407754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898158641","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2018-0223","title":"Creativity from paradoxical experience: a theory of how individuals achieve creativity while adopting paradoxical frames","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Originality; Extant taxon; Flexibility (engineering); Cognitive psychology; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Epistemology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04387076116909676,"score_gpt":0.28540085457961584,"score_spread":0.24153009341051906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898158641","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13799877,0.0032076736,0.5684152,0.010477927,0.00042088682,0.00038279884,0.00015194989,0.00026599914,0.27867877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95726544,0.00073767855,0.037700556,0.00046108227,0.00008772254,0.00025405202,0.00004074539,0.000035198696,0.0034173988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778557,0.0011333082,0.000111806134,0.00032482643,0.0004721579,0.00017230159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924697,0.004990196,0.0008465382,0.000756457,0.00047128322,0.00046592986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035356174,0.00062872557,0.00043752018,0.00136837,0.001291409,0.0055381632,0.0016732853,0.0017941975,0.0062614856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012948562,0.0003338267,0.0013571266,0.0009792327,0.00934416,0.006385579,0.003421541,0.0022562225,0.00055784633],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031805677,0.000076853896,0.0015898217,0.00017877793,0.000042350202,0.0002349436,0.004786794,0.005726123,0.00064951164,0.9696177,0.0008273418,0.016237868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000299098,0.000054163884,0.00080707064,0.0000954797,0.000021955513,0.0002526822,0.0010223071,0.01254034,0.0002591287,0.9794504,0.0054408973,0.000025557649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007418925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004398159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062614856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019894266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023877374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0209468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898166599","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2017-0531","title":"Evasive knowledge hiding in academia: when competitive individuals are asked to collaborate","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":306,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Knowledge management; Originality; Moderation; Tacit knowledge; Knowledge transfer; Situational ethics; Competitive advantage; Sample (material); Interdependence; Knowledge value chain; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Organizational learning; Business; Marketing; Political science; Creativity","score_opus":0.041452618814990634,"score_gpt":0.35696635085472017,"score_spread":0.31551373203972954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898166599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97895056,0.00055863854,0.0041101053,0.0016171478,0.000054911623,0.00003862727,0.000025249845,0.00005168446,0.014592934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99842346,0.000094341754,0.00072853843,0.00017500661,0.0000264954,0.00001747322,0.00001827472,0.00000866612,0.0005075922],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97221,0.015430883,0.0016408843,0.0019581772,0.0066339113,0.0021261256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8414316,0.0956578,0.037783887,0.011640376,0.0054848604,0.008001531],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016343808,0.00046928553,0.0007118294,0.0023803962,0.0060847388,0.008980339,0.0019200714,0.0022389414,0.0037171815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0710768,0.0004397442,0.000549181,0.002030783,0.008822414,0.006170372,0.01122474,0.0021654733,0.00048175693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005936849,0.0006719121,0.30153733,0.0009779118,0.0002134122,0.0026412092,0.52767146,0.0008427903,0.008279061,0.015831567,0.0021008572,0.13863884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008077739,0.00093851105,0.17782174,0.0007602266,0.00016932821,0.0030661933,0.7287365,0.0028868366,0.0059523354,0.05007756,0.029226549,0.0002833584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086805463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014466702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98365617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020989338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003938298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08643532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902430595","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2017-0358","title":"Organizational knowledge retention and knowledge loss","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":112,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge value chain; Organizational learning; Personal knowledge management; Explicit knowledge; Knowledge transfer; Body of knowledge; Procedural knowledge; Computer science; Domain knowledge; Knowledge engineering; Knowledge integration; Knowledge survey; Agency (philosophy); Knowledge economy; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Formative assessment; Sociology","score_opus":0.030218052774744767,"score_gpt":0.3117506316888492,"score_spread":0.28153257891410444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902430595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8870333,0.004365919,0.025512723,0.00802358,0.00009760836,0.000515734,0.00011443428,0.00017055798,0.074166216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956364,0.0004596506,0.0022837508,0.00023354417,0.000035273682,0.00007159797,0.00004121635,0.00001067318,0.0012278039],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97749853,0.009233769,0.0016579962,0.0014427813,0.0071695587,0.0029974084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8335067,0.09484901,0.0271568,0.018543959,0.020305632,0.0056378893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025571117,0.00045339356,0.0007764931,0.0040381695,0.0032225975,0.0077174674,0.0026546044,0.0013440537,0.002622939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.112098515,0.00026798696,0.0006957889,0.002678902,0.007313668,0.007139449,0.008191082,0.0018833849,0.00038101376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004079338,0.0010357717,0.2349742,0.0021619536,0.00051556795,0.0010434324,0.048236325,0.0056291725,0.0018014098,0.08469529,0.0027509877,0.616748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029132873,0.004146955,0.4453247,0.0068025584,0.0009131487,0.004168382,0.14843649,0.020655554,0.012297689,0.26940727,0.087154426,0.00040149182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043321582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025654656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025571117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004644125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00768784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13523465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916578330","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2018-0636","title":"Overcoming knowledge barriers to health care through continuous learning","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Health care; Assimilation (phonology); Bureaucracy; Business; Computer science; Process management; Political science","score_opus":0.01827557174469146,"score_gpt":0.32735893467288124,"score_spread":0.3090833629281898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916578330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8808451,0.0028864571,0.052666146,0.009985975,0.0002472953,0.0018806894,0.0001407593,0.00050348724,0.050844155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96423686,0.0007039324,0.032412224,0.00080287067,0.00009116351,0.0004955122,0.000043444314,0.000015721047,0.0011982548],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98397267,0.011176964,0.00062626955,0.0009064818,0.002181028,0.0011365644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8905923,0.09019985,0.005887095,0.0051195105,0.0037147258,0.004486531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014937689,0.00048128693,0.0006119468,0.0011882053,0.0013801556,0.0059133978,0.0021804993,0.0011264075,0.00402723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06439045,0.00023331663,0.000729177,0.001168389,0.0021584642,0.0026493804,0.0069544306,0.0020006648,0.00044478595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004890235,0.0046225977,0.066107325,0.003098459,0.00021049453,0.0005198343,0.029291315,0.0034959419,0.0018934412,0.010778554,0.0036798655,0.8758133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002789442,0.023795914,0.40179327,0.019909237,0.0016282739,0.0038441303,0.17651573,0.075678684,0.02021927,0.12285152,0.15016748,0.0008070744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021099406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022947208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014937689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019126557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009834596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07899898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953515272","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2018-0190","title":"Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":584,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Structural equation modeling; Social capital; Business; Knowledge value chain; Common-method variance; Competitive advantage; Explicit knowledge; Quality (philosophy); Marketing; Organizational learning; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.07799425124846517,"score_gpt":0.40719295428815167,"score_spread":0.3291987030396865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953515272","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99697316,0.00011244622,0.00044404136,0.00008820073,0.0000023283758,0.000047321064,0.00001753839,0.000002274053,0.002312495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993368,0.000062075254,0.00041862234,0.0000062023623,0.0000021940402,0.000021285161,0.000013508179,5.43967e-7,0.00013895283],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971942,0.0013546036,0.00022059961,0.0002111408,0.0005294333,0.00049000466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9605706,0.026624957,0.0069608344,0.0010737471,0.0026193028,0.002150556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057447394,0.00032136607,0.00033458785,0.0019848156,0.0009359929,0.0027420735,0.0005080962,0.000589986,0.0016390972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018324448,0.0001878524,0.00062131585,0.0013261669,0.0010691524,0.0020585712,0.0016861912,0.00048622786,0.00012863823],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002975544,0.0004907747,0.94485754,0.00038659837,0.00018287267,0.00026008656,0.0067700623,0.0016565984,0.0012017293,0.0027345559,0.00010488483,0.04105677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019165725,0.0010668401,0.966475,0.00020446033,0.00033415307,0.0001791493,0.016867971,0.009466619,0.0022597327,0.002250334,0.000834111,0.000042455133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034022827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055461284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057447394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014890608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031443257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030381441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2961448545","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2018-0007","title":"Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: conceptualization, typology, and empirical demonstration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":91,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Typology; Originality; Conceptualization; Public relations; Critical Incident Technique; Business; Value (mathematics); Interpersonal communication; Knowledge management; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Marketing; Political science; Computer science; Creativity; Epistemology","score_opus":0.058321516861819106,"score_gpt":0.3747423233515909,"score_spread":0.3164208064897718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2961448545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467089,0.0007354312,0.028381687,0.0006553977,0.00002526559,0.000318149,0.000048975686,0.0000663258,0.023059778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938683,0.00017378438,0.005388073,0.000070017435,0.000008104225,0.00016982845,0.000025099365,0.000009031007,0.00028785362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859548,0.007137962,0.0013407569,0.0011872117,0.003570629,0.0008087256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9423478,0.030781254,0.013922666,0.00811483,0.0035005303,0.0013329474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007862689,0.0004918126,0.0004559481,0.0054501793,0.0020941733,0.004466461,0.0012474557,0.0014400958,0.001411373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025354825,0.0003420959,0.00056836323,0.002755102,0.015401107,0.00467949,0.0054280427,0.0015527199,0.0001423835],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035791512,0.0007869369,0.49950808,0.0010573328,0.0001091009,0.0024499749,0.223365,0.0020805502,0.0052043577,0.13087688,0.0007858101,0.13341801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055091277,0.0010274107,0.36016038,0.0025702985,0.00014256255,0.011692688,0.45184806,0.01862726,0.008370309,0.116510645,0.028694827,0.00030050447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002383542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024544087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007862689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027949084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028204275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041582346},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970273183","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2018-0608","title":"Challenges and progress in integrating knowledge: cases from clothing and textiles in South Africa","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Global and Cross-Cultural Management","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Clothing; Restructuring; Competition (biology); Business; Knowledge sharing; Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Process (computing); Marketing; Industrial organization; Public relations; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04005216363872854,"score_gpt":0.3201979760142499,"score_spread":0.28014581237552133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970273183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790015,0.0005863458,0.0006780144,0.0022088946,0.000025350424,0.0000663313,0.00001965246,0.0000060354537,0.017407913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950252,0.0007763369,0.0005470201,0.00022704803,0.000010399344,0.000026215004,0.000014412005,0.000012052595,0.0033611767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950303,0.0025602665,0.0002405899,0.000310359,0.0005175494,0.0013409689],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917067,0.005582498,0.0010502676,0.00042694175,0.00036227028,0.0008713197],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004029987,0.00068137527,0.000519517,0.0024143506,0.018609596,0.007943899,0.0019788465,0.004201865,0.0054792822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012667806,0.0007679467,0.00043409347,0.0034534037,0.012509858,0.0058310283,0.009083209,0.0029990573,0.0005225729],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043538166,0.00010624826,0.009346709,0.0002939798,0.000010033126,0.062004615,0.90673107,0.00024716067,0.000953637,0.008707112,0.00065638346,0.01089962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003977574,0.000033974156,0.0040480704,0.00031444986,0.000007647849,0.00712367,0.9697001,0.000118503674,0.0004545384,0.0011830099,0.016999476,0.000012479873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024404265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049420662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024404265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070811575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051874015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051377594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2970551859","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2019-0084","title":"Value creation through big data application process management: the case of the oil and gas industry","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Originality; Context (archaeology); Knowledge management; Value (mathematics); Business; Business value; Process (computing); Marketing; Qualitative research; Data science; Computer science; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.07096832312083672,"score_gpt":0.31740436423144236,"score_spread":0.24643604111060563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2970551859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89058715,0.0009471989,0.03127597,0.019105613,0.000117871925,0.00051928556,0.00019022502,0.00016034923,0.057096288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836146,0.00058309466,0.012375559,0.0005061555,0.00004795299,0.00009904426,0.000102788,0.000037671412,0.0026330997],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900961,0.0059600705,0.0002920527,0.0004225757,0.0020154498,0.001213751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96859455,0.023409778,0.0016034263,0.0022046084,0.0019643072,0.0022232675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01157212,0.0004006907,0.00031303367,0.0023028937,0.0068641715,0.010583493,0.001817707,0.0029038177,0.0022224023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016479447,0.00035901237,0.0006370628,0.004238887,0.0062587173,0.007828693,0.0063970527,0.003218038,0.00045884508],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006239687,0.001988139,0.10844864,0.0014639513,0.0001512816,0.052121084,0.33912387,0.021773059,0.004887681,0.25617382,0.015498402,0.19774617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014639646,0.0005353367,0.031448074,0.0012346708,0.00009624804,0.0072988733,0.5972623,0.057695534,0.005781515,0.09378779,0.20450683,0.00020640565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010224557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010935635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01157212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005226151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007872761,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061199963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971263290","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2018-0734","title":"Are we in this together? Knowledge hiding in teams, collective prosocial motivation and leader-member exchange","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Prosocial behavior; Psychology; Originality; Social psychology; Social exchange theory; Value (mathematics); Knowledge sharing; Field (mathematics); Knowledge management; Creativity","score_opus":0.06572621867375857,"score_gpt":0.32430644832566063,"score_spread":0.2585802296519021,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971263290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9956825,0.00017201615,0.00071803597,0.0010445599,0.000014098403,0.0000075181592,0.000007975328,0.0000058174614,0.0023474004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994578,0.000054341635,0.00023091066,0.00007621491,0.0000065634445,0.000004488062,0.0000047856797,0.0000013711175,0.00016363559],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99568546,0.0024469853,0.00017212497,0.00039965412,0.0006478445,0.000647944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96984565,0.011578487,0.01283088,0.0016100873,0.00097090646,0.0031639398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050787427,0.000219076,0.0004073414,0.0009090568,0.003405749,0.0032635194,0.0006550081,0.0010294768,0.002688525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025782611,0.00024531543,0.0003643503,0.0006414983,0.0035402135,0.003565178,0.002898105,0.001360209,0.00021559105],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044160866,0.0010931249,0.76664966,0.00025310233,0.0003913861,0.0010412447,0.10951546,0.00071978895,0.0020613363,0.0064226575,0.0016926086,0.10971806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008946676,0.00080976204,0.6230154,0.0004520267,0.00026671228,0.0016723593,0.3189105,0.0038389852,0.0018045323,0.04077959,0.008240803,0.0001199012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015953166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016736733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0050787427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007436228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001335432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026859283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975124582","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2018-0738","title":"Knowledge management and social entrepreneurship education: lessons learned from an exploratory two-country study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entrepreneurship; Social entrepreneurship; Value (mathematics); Exploratory research; Public relations; Sociology; Marketing; Business; Political science; Social science; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.051533042515351485,"score_gpt":0.3166417980420635,"score_spread":0.265108755526712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975124582","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9852823,0.002602249,0.0017433832,0.0020610678,0.000043365748,0.00043088433,0.0001441545,0.000008272907,0.0076843663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99059045,0.0040604244,0.0024742566,0.00082636194,0.000029521865,0.000405958,0.00012985992,0.0000116626525,0.0014715494],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927521,0.0052071726,0.00030466,0.0003932891,0.00058817456,0.0007547162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732425,0.022865767,0.0009209817,0.0006743456,0.0015224855,0.00077392074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016358893,0.0007676248,0.0012377134,0.0027326401,0.0030568037,0.0048164995,0.0016347116,0.0013307224,0.0023159876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016714904,0.0006237381,0.0005916928,0.00345386,0.002893989,0.008203805,0.0048336955,0.0020997638,0.00036663972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017427883,0.003785763,0.1395586,0.0016881296,0.000116293195,0.004734784,0.7319491,0.00031513188,0.00067731086,0.008518686,0.0025689513,0.10591293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034426812,0.00058644667,0.062807664,0.0017073336,0.00007891905,0.0007117205,0.9204225,0.0005101633,0.00038132293,0.0022795862,0.010436657,0.000043361353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010151348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024047537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016358893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029204283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004183416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08651513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975815114","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2018-0707","title":"Entrepreneurs’ ingenuity and self-imposed ethical constraints: creating sustainability-oriented new ventures and knowledge","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Ingenuity; Creativity; Sustainability; Entrepreneurship; Flexibility (engineering); Knowledge management; Business; Management; Computer science; Psychology; Economics","score_opus":0.007446344930212658,"score_gpt":0.24635285720253364,"score_spread":0.238906512272321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975815114","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9228,0.0005830912,0.0071208,0.0025041492,0.000051431536,0.00013765527,0.000008869279,0.000016468633,0.06677762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99668247,0.00015931038,0.001720051,0.00009875839,0.000006273787,0.000027579563,0.0000034939706,0.0000037596637,0.00129824],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933994,0.0046037924,0.00017778804,0.00029349493,0.00077508274,0.00075050484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813595,0.012529005,0.002149671,0.0012241853,0.0007368475,0.0020007486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0093082795,0.00021530304,0.00027256724,0.0013170613,0.0046943403,0.009501806,0.0008514252,0.0012124053,0.001743787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0131882485,0.0003064639,0.00039184582,0.0007934648,0.012416737,0.005464634,0.008416817,0.0016340277,0.00020585112],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013068144,0.0008831531,0.052531693,0.00046200256,0.00006066637,0.00786987,0.65030307,0.0013920256,0.0027788307,0.19391023,0.0018409871,0.08783684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008401598,0.00037742133,0.030748019,0.0011953355,0.00006737431,0.004263806,0.6989645,0.0035315186,0.0038995363,0.12601545,0.13074751,0.00010557922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005837395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016154996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009501806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005049112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049227476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2986065267","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2018-0776","title":"Transformational leadership and employee knowledge sharing: explore the mediating roles of psychological safety and team efficacy","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Knowledge sharing; Knowledge management; Psychology; Psychological safety; Transactional leadership; Structural equation modeling; Originality; Context (archaeology); Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Creativity","score_opus":0.09797560522189058,"score_gpt":0.34909327378124133,"score_spread":0.25111766855935075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2986065267","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945391,0.00009826869,0.0006267458,0.00034603133,0.0000056052954,0.000026490537,0.00001634153,0.00000540215,0.0043360516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996172,0.000030884377,0.00012771184,0.00002260532,0.0000025208114,0.000010056174,0.000007503093,6.119697e-7,0.00018089682],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977881,0.0010777548,0.00011054706,0.00019318121,0.00038978824,0.00044067734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98984015,0.004838992,0.0026216595,0.00065849896,0.00071032206,0.0013303648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024603044,0.0002891253,0.00034294592,0.0010852101,0.0014128118,0.0019703065,0.00046015868,0.00045203845,0.003986806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007328025,0.0001195215,0.0005533216,0.00057434884,0.0013727027,0.0009015035,0.0020941892,0.000739549,0.00014371712],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002244355,0.0014467731,0.9047639,0.00025524548,0.00035311255,0.00048173044,0.021665832,0.00076705054,0.0013406201,0.0054187626,0.0003632549,0.06291929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006247352,0.0005942066,0.9534546,0.00018567432,0.00023165905,0.00025820697,0.031003974,0.0048325956,0.0014095841,0.0058740797,0.0020504985,0.000042345975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030976979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028421285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003986806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010271814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030516305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013337195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013885712","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2019-0426","title":"Measuring knowledge spillovers transfer from scholars in business schools: validation of a multiple-item scale","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cronbach's alpha; Nomological network; Scale (ratio); Confirmatory factor analysis; Originality; Reliability (semiconductor); Sample (material); Knowledge management; Exploratory factor analysis; Construct (python library); Psychology; Computer science; Structural equation modeling; Management science; Psychometrics; Social psychology; Creativity; Engineering","score_opus":0.04055423570706682,"score_gpt":0.22999681518146303,"score_spread":0.18944257947439622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013885712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98225224,0.0002838857,0.006946056,0.00037061286,0.00004066306,0.0022408804,0.0003370927,0.000042975546,0.0074856216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726437,0.0003449067,0.022810366,0.00014096088,0.000024471046,0.0028104046,0.00040108996,0.000010899995,0.0008132245],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876546,0.0035741047,0.0015390515,0.00067952747,0.0059310235,0.00062170165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9441047,0.02709432,0.007781938,0.0036906637,0.014595722,0.0027327286],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02604209,0.0003934197,0.0006966196,0.004362245,0.0020021782,0.0021417353,0.0012502058,0.00079009327,0.002030049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050505012,0.0003250247,0.0009326107,0.0035552972,0.0022135633,0.0019004055,0.003139966,0.0010534062,0.00037347645],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036982383,0.0017719273,0.7441094,0.0009987416,0.00024249317,0.0002232778,0.018981976,0.0015374569,0.0035282024,0.0019265655,0.0016948449,0.22461516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111395486,0.0013281633,0.96595097,0.00051721645,0.00014639784,0.00019945778,0.019071236,0.0031453702,0.0023452253,0.0019563332,0.0051439563,0.0000842747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00844045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019916596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9739579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034354958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010602289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13772535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3014384867","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2019-0337","title":"Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the perspective of the target","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Workplace Violence and Bullying","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Originality; Value (mathematics); Innocence; Gratification; Public relations; Incentive; Business; Psychology; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Political science; Creativity; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.0447906346627498,"score_gpt":0.33687272581663785,"score_spread":0.29208209115388806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3014384867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858084,0.00054830796,0.0027236473,0.000846734,0.000015901993,0.000013087134,0.000010920953,0.000011026832,0.010022171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99954516,0.000067400346,0.00015366434,0.00005668078,0.000005191947,0.0000031668405,0.0000027634585,0.0000014907257,0.00016439336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964031,0.0019859646,0.00018851976,0.0002729552,0.00067734334,0.00047217056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9895263,0.004112754,0.0039874995,0.0010232514,0.00066679687,0.00068340916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023332182,0.00018643844,0.00028550677,0.0014954169,0.0021490965,0.0035117506,0.0005453403,0.000851293,0.0011712572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009570701,0.00019144863,0.0002077543,0.0005779441,0.0054021403,0.001968298,0.0033200288,0.0014683532,0.000092675305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002961573,0.00033099647,0.5244601,0.0002753153,0.00010965891,0.003481301,0.3741178,0.0004767786,0.0072287456,0.022576474,0.0006258652,0.06602081],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000143223515,0.0006471246,0.46868104,0.000567063,0.00009764802,0.010814343,0.4712854,0.0022381549,0.0048482562,0.016673604,0.024036324,0.000096653705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031796906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032802925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035117506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012351348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012591801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012339413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3019770203","doi":"10.1108/jkm-02-2020-0081","title":"Big data for small and medium-sized enterprises (SME): a knowledge management model","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Big Data and Business Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":103,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Big data; Computer science; Data science; Knowledge management; Conceptual model; Small and medium-sized enterprises; Context (archaeology); Business intelligence; Exploit; Business; Data mining; Database","score_opus":0.20425817568480795,"score_gpt":0.3195073242493034,"score_spread":0.11524914856449545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3019770203","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12329403,0.004699669,0.39101255,0.12546957,0.00039664254,0.0013806154,0.001068102,0.00035169834,0.3523271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9159768,0.0030339663,0.06547556,0.002216896,0.00019154,0.00075700146,0.00039765413,0.000049169637,0.011901329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957004,0.0018275669,0.00032859127,0.0005871618,0.0010530475,0.00050322746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842279,0.009649504,0.0012433934,0.0010140867,0.00190013,0.001964976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007340046,0.00063469535,0.0005208453,0.004564551,0.0039147884,0.012518668,0.0029509922,0.004172471,0.004731029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012767509,0.00052187627,0.0012887868,0.005624883,0.0077287513,0.01988018,0.0064745196,0.0028594898,0.0010075393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034341283,0.0001605396,0.004807501,0.00029303355,0.000050212184,0.00059060345,0.0042723645,0.013235599,0.0002621733,0.9530654,0.00407564,0.01915266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037994185,0.000079529746,0.0024392158,0.00066520256,0.00006133369,0.00038512194,0.008531256,0.090207,0.00038370062,0.85567445,0.04147355,0.00006154005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007756527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059260675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012518668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007613312,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012223017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055238724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022055341","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2019-0493","title":"Replicate or adapt? Franchising and organizational routines","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Franchising Strategies and Performance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Replicate; Originality; Plural; Robustness (evolution); Marketing; Business; Value (mathematics); Replication (statistics); Knowledge management; Computer science; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.02775813749417658,"score_gpt":0.22796407190501608,"score_spread":0.2002059344108395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022055341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99820316,0.00002158438,0.00022267534,0.00004234783,8.276884e-7,0.0000064861174,0.0000070232713,0.0000020315872,0.0014938129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99951994,0.000012979868,0.00021738443,0.000009970668,7.313849e-7,0.0000020797954,0.000009879141,6.7690956e-7,0.00022639224],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985886,0.00053432264,0.00008506944,0.0002042649,0.00023919553,0.00034846747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898385,0.0033941367,0.003890139,0.00096950843,0.00066675415,0.0012409613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023726039,0.00022455485,0.00016865855,0.00065890496,0.00097429904,0.0023592892,0.00047687077,0.0004483617,0.001962513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093631195,0.0001018556,0.000114376,0.00060806057,0.0013944183,0.0010582947,0.0008249564,0.00035161374,0.00018864468],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099772165,0.00025303927,0.9237729,0.000040361065,0.0000476768,0.00019790471,0.013649052,0.00049378065,0.0018523106,0.0020263381,0.00024471388,0.057322294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008569875,0.00018962169,0.9689882,0.000037819886,0.000014718266,0.00017647332,0.026870292,0.0010010144,0.00033598844,0.00084771356,0.0015059932,0.000023603108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024523355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04264358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024523355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015352484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00132819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04876119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3029866646","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2019-0274","title":"Knowledge-sharing efforts and employee creative behavior: the invigorating roles of passion for work, time sufficiency and procedural justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":74,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Originality; Creativity; Knowledge management; Passion; Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Procedural justice; Organizational learning; Work behavior; Psychology; Public relations; Business; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.044384277114042726,"score_gpt":0.321384725401652,"score_spread":0.2770004482876093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3029866646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.994938,0.00013138416,0.0005515861,0.00027177724,0.000002202124,0.000012325972,0.0000060934076,0.0000025780082,0.0040839543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999617,0.000028304949,0.00019341243,0.000015926971,0.0000015313977,0.0000048654815,0.0000023526766,7.485948e-7,0.00013581582],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965837,0.0021328083,0.00015414131,0.00021402707,0.000455693,0.00045965987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96374166,0.021635223,0.010311609,0.0015911603,0.0008573742,0.001863005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042836987,0.00025248097,0.00020273414,0.000822772,0.0015937703,0.0031318571,0.00048450351,0.000532567,0.002061258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019326694,0.00018450023,0.00025720132,0.00063176407,0.003369968,0.0011737943,0.0025395309,0.00073742226,0.00008049833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047108028,0.0010615994,0.7993422,0.00044415938,0.00026554198,0.000486382,0.087500684,0.00088811683,0.0047490094,0.0100860875,0.0002896399,0.09441548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030713978,0.00031569903,0.9291562,0.00020872623,0.00010461477,0.0002769599,0.057953697,0.001263237,0.0015336508,0.0064657717,0.002648371,0.000042323365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004617718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006824595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004617718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014108823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032135136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022654593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037751193","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2020-0075","title":"The influence of investors’ opinions of human capital and multitasking on firm performance: a knowledge management perspective","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Corporate Finance and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Human multitasking; Business; Context (archaeology); Human capital; Marketing; Industrial organization; Perspective (graphical); Knowledge management; Economics; Psychology; Market economy","score_opus":0.023914537137910363,"score_gpt":0.25258577056756765,"score_spread":0.22867123342965728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037751193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968827,0.00016074858,0.00031416846,0.00039223296,0.0000072022035,0.000007806995,0.000048023277,0.000001446135,0.0021856898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978656,0.000031521566,0.000039447303,0.000029216115,0.000008874133,0.0000018208494,0.000014387445,3.4598278e-7,0.00008782067],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831057,0.00074426626,0.000114956114,0.00017312542,0.00027762278,0.00037939678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97328115,0.010928912,0.012508318,0.00063115836,0.00096126046,0.0016891384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002804548,0.00017360736,0.00021067224,0.0008155478,0.0003580176,0.0018549099,0.00025981115,0.00050633156,0.0014758883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014061882,0.00009609453,0.00022683392,0.0006495825,0.0007663691,0.0010984935,0.00085559534,0.0006513216,0.00013478196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010159489,0.000101009246,0.9871946,0.000019213308,0.000060697603,0.00014992629,0.0014072176,0.00042344548,0.0003194955,0.0005065068,0.00014052662,0.009575752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045622564,0.0001599996,0.99222374,0.000024298051,0.000024096227,0.00006521884,0.0045420765,0.0014199426,0.0002852081,0.0007255909,0.0005105671,0.000014636401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004106849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00477155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004106849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007776057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044865138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01483202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041678747","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2019-0741","title":"Information technology-enabled explorative learning and competitive performance in industrial service SMEs: a configurational analysis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; HEC Montréal; Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"","keywords":"Qualitative comparative analysis; Knowledge management; Dynamic capabilities; Competitive advantage; Computer science; Equifinality; Service (business); Context (archaeology); Fuzzy set; Originality; Process management; Business; Fuzzy logic; Marketing; Artificial intelligence; Qualitative research; Machine learning","score_opus":0.02649732276811659,"score_gpt":0.23459532206088085,"score_spread":0.20809799929276426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041678747","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99008125,0.0000826735,0.0033137957,0.00012309718,0.0000022201086,0.000057386973,0.00006617949,0.00000957973,0.006263819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999622,0.000011200364,0.00030945803,0.0000036818997,5.281515e-7,0.000010600004,0.000015316982,8.1625114e-7,0.00002645707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967964,0.0018873982,0.00017900614,0.00022183137,0.00055106333,0.00036425423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839431,0.011036698,0.002053397,0.0008733748,0.001541346,0.0005520812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035938655,0.00042079677,0.00033231458,0.00574957,0.0013408911,0.0029416475,0.0008341518,0.0006824219,0.004268346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018261611,0.00026242042,0.00079957524,0.0068495884,0.0040655495,0.0031019168,0.0031172228,0.000605434,0.00015999582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064275623,0.00054140267,0.80847263,0.0003589089,0.00033071588,0.0017010317,0.023998072,0.035949524,0.00203489,0.06908255,0.00043964165,0.056447897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047307185,0.00064882747,0.7210804,0.00034115274,0.00016678705,0.00085149164,0.097374484,0.12407261,0.002194419,0.05130199,0.0017821337,0.00013848273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007533478,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007533478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039859787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017118655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028920472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082283342","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2020-0416","title":"Knowledge sabotage as an extreme form of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the role of narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy, and competitiveness","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Machiavellianism; Psychopathy; Dark triad; Narcissism; Psychology; Social psychology; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Emotional intelligence; Originality; Creativity","score_opus":0.04518674989956612,"score_gpt":0.3399804737385538,"score_spread":0.29479372383898766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082283342","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981178,0.00009896553,0.00029247277,0.00014186383,0.0000044441977,0.000019513784,0.000027119477,0.000004892605,0.0012929542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99937326,0.000041734787,0.00026351074,0.000030389501,0.0000032619205,0.00001535113,0.000030778672,0.0000011811899,0.00024066718],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811137,0.00069989177,0.00012431269,0.00026833647,0.00053610484,0.00025998068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97329706,0.010259659,0.011000106,0.002069417,0.00088048994,0.0024933086],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023482207,0.00033164615,0.00040372624,0.0006808485,0.0008852177,0.0019609055,0.0004833282,0.00058962335,0.004273675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012535686,0.0002416437,0.00060614274,0.0004915208,0.0015203739,0.00071992155,0.0014441664,0.0012692659,0.00024728474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103677354,0.00021786457,0.98824024,0.000048889247,0.0001078982,0.00010771941,0.0015683062,0.00012930951,0.00057933223,0.00021049846,0.00008218042,0.008604093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049017513,0.00011815114,0.99716103,0.000023787617,0.000026346243,0.00008666153,0.0015893987,0.00039426406,0.00013500568,0.00026199626,0.0001905842,0.000007873937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049217395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077348575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049217395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077855476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015729511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014296889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084887014","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2020-0319","title":"Open innovation for sustainability through creating shared value-role of knowledge management system, openness and organizational structure","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Environmental Sustainability in Business","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Openness to experience; Knowledge management; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Open innovation; Value (mathematics); Business; Sustainability; Knowledge sharing; Creating shared value; Context (archaeology); Organizational learning; Computer science; Public relations; Corporate social responsibility; Psychology","score_opus":0.015399999020104638,"score_gpt":0.25795290033960866,"score_spread":0.24255290131950402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084887014","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6787215,0.0040395833,0.07513304,0.011187097,0.00017639682,0.0006162963,0.00019980792,0.00015691496,0.22976936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886358,0.00047955904,0.009060342,0.00014644288,0.000030707044,0.0000956409,0.000027199538,0.000008571367,0.001515741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98977727,0.0051501407,0.00062432047,0.00086280715,0.002868089,0.0007173116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96398187,0.022060141,0.005870641,0.0038197273,0.002315841,0.0019516535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008783097,0.00029143895,0.00048251337,0.004224964,0.0027849148,0.011737613,0.00087275374,0.0013027355,0.0058365096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018195206,0.00021358451,0.00077408645,0.0031413424,0.012252956,0.0091580795,0.0078471415,0.0014105008,0.00040603647],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118237316,0.0003484128,0.059881773,0.001607323,0.00019089243,0.0008486747,0.032244105,0.0021861717,0.004352758,0.67295825,0.0016944492,0.22356886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004711818,0.00037596983,0.07227257,0.0020333228,0.00019506302,0.001126809,0.05079021,0.0048493533,0.004939863,0.8023686,0.06088711,0.00011399236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006715565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010950915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011737613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042711147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007426481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04645002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093779846","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2020-0392","title":"Knowledge management in health care: an integrative and result-driven clinical staff management model","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Competitive and Knowledge Intelligence","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Health care; Business; Context (archaeology); Benchmarking; Originality; Construct (python library); Process management; Hospital accreditation; Accreditation; Qualitative research; Medicine; Sociology; Computer science; Marketing; Medical education; Political science","score_opus":0.06263240718515216,"score_gpt":0.3552001130652605,"score_spread":0.29256770588010833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093779846","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17013349,0.0026800178,0.412599,0.038830586,0.0001711881,0.0019748874,0.00022413624,0.00035096434,0.37303585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90490353,0.00093557424,0.08673633,0.0008455925,0.00007111106,0.00062951323,0.000104761406,0.00002498131,0.00574859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99118924,0.0051986054,0.0004975907,0.0007594722,0.0016809615,0.0006741654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917778,0.003927795,0.00095201156,0.00092672673,0.0014044682,0.0010112759],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008866295,0.0006794734,0.00038778156,0.0032399185,0.001990134,0.009385387,0.0023591614,0.0021175938,0.0023331349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008574327,0.00036207834,0.00081285485,0.002283118,0.010528152,0.005651033,0.0040374813,0.0013055782,0.0006006374],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007878291,0.00058696454,0.015513205,0.00095469673,0.00014722854,0.00078693515,0.033425804,0.011858374,0.0012764025,0.8377542,0.0026604414,0.09495696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017924252,0.00060275313,0.011028388,0.0017698795,0.00022098146,0.0010809336,0.028007882,0.054530617,0.001915099,0.8247489,0.07577866,0.00013668771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041764174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030974445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009385387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00690056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016858146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050067306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117477803","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2020-0571","title":"Two-decade bibliometric overview of publications in the <i>Journal of Knowledge Management</i>","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Organizational and Employee Performance","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bibliometrics; Body of knowledge; Subject (documents); Domain knowledge; Data science; Computer science; Library science; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.06603799575204125,"score_gpt":0.3138100271818713,"score_spread":0.24777203142983004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117477803","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6221964,0.18006039,0.00420463,0.0066367374,0.0009994694,0.0003592854,0.11791801,0.0008356404,0.06678944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8031278,0.096945755,0.007868296,0.0006443891,0.0014533577,0.0004568193,0.08088253,0.00019410175,0.008427096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99319166,0.0008913798,0.002137944,0.0007863774,0.0025911517,0.00040159057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9521096,0.014753065,0.01540222,0.0016414069,0.014441999,0.0016517086],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068159867,0.00047073016,0.00083395594,0.11786534,0.0011339189,0.0061309375,0.0007319134,0.00060324033,0.0031669182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028888127,0.00022780338,0.0009124181,0.1658303,0.000788169,0.0040799687,0.0017443092,0.00050670136,0.0015337294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004450649,0.00012523428,0.55334777,0.015665099,0.0008396422,0.0009647352,0.0081975795,0.001319616,0.0038905,0.009751825,0.054654147,0.3507988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000091259535,0.00013188385,0.85011077,0.0022712117,0.0003132649,0.0009194574,0.0056769247,0.0007967865,0.0017293938,0.00094636617,0.13703676,0.00005810191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006634746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008095269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8821347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025656351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00497485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036046803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119509660","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0683","title":"Team reflexivity and employee innovative behavior: the mediating role of knowledge sharing and moderating role of leadership","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflexivity; Originality; Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Multilevel model; Perspective (graphical); Social psychology; Computer science; Sociology; Creativity","score_opus":0.08035040993085969,"score_gpt":0.34965325509774814,"score_spread":0.26930284516688846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119509660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9949994,0.00009180368,0.0016533713,0.0002602356,0.00000780361,0.000030786327,0.00002476182,0.000008549878,0.0029231661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99906594,0.000032852662,0.0006504862,0.000023917559,0.0000041920352,0.000021579253,0.0000107274345,0.0000022093486,0.00018819867],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956115,0.0026973323,0.00019632636,0.00043281278,0.00055904343,0.0005030747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96152717,0.024941778,0.007886122,0.0022752918,0.0011384409,0.0022311476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004189819,0.00026138237,0.00036286982,0.00073270826,0.0010310049,0.0021994454,0.0005757451,0.0005080715,0.0033389966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023055924,0.0001869579,0.00061176374,0.00050072395,0.0012752825,0.0011765328,0.0023794658,0.0009333392,0.00013832463],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003927105,0.0012371186,0.90770996,0.00026872658,0.000594648,0.00027459572,0.020158665,0.0008623353,0.0033486215,0.0050510173,0.00030881254,0.05979284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005154898,0.0009644744,0.9649172,0.00028801,0.00044714983,0.00019704177,0.017172748,0.004818081,0.0027449746,0.0067318846,0.0016270758,0.000039805826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026306228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028863775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004189819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008788564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002327726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022158146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126507733","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0721","title":"Knowledge assets, capabilities and performance measurement systems: a resource orchestration theory approach","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":122,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Orchestration; Structural equation modeling; Computer science; Originality; Resource (disambiguation); Bridge (graph theory); Control (management); Business; Process management; Psychology","score_opus":0.0341845846978993,"score_gpt":0.223035292122703,"score_spread":0.1888507074248037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126507733","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46447805,0.004138775,0.3787501,0.010295699,0.00011011302,0.001074798,0.00050665654,0.00025274322,0.14039306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97906333,0.0005040835,0.019492576,0.00017368837,0.000025249044,0.00022675194,0.000047044105,0.000006673431,0.00046062772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944887,0.0034719917,0.0002833839,0.00047142475,0.0010014423,0.00028310248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98767906,0.008980993,0.0017888537,0.0006163269,0.0006504267,0.00028443453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005598408,0.0005519934,0.00040978362,0.0040770033,0.00077558646,0.004282184,0.0009656887,0.00086426194,0.0028720242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013696234,0.00027881778,0.00048737373,0.004193372,0.0052253855,0.005332557,0.0023947218,0.0010739911,0.0001926846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013058026,0.00051123067,0.09806421,0.00087585585,0.00026373548,0.00032121438,0.008005784,0.019284429,0.0012766911,0.68621,0.001288362,0.1837679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011811691,0.0007543969,0.0927913,0.0014035609,0.00030752,0.00048745883,0.01846516,0.100648105,0.0036975765,0.76014924,0.021030132,0.00014751764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030375258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020015924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005598408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003914987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004931073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029607594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126640707","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0730","title":"A structured literature review of scientometric research of the knowledge management discipline: a 2021 update","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Scientometrics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Publishing; Value (mathematics); Knowledge management; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.032947950929448855,"score_gpt":0.33105548665496753,"score_spread":0.2981075357255187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126640707","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001468499,0.9782216,0.0018975185,0.00896279,0.0027175085,0.0003854853,0.0016902143,0.000075789954,0.0045805555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013006558,0.969497,0.0066039586,0.005095149,0.0019202951,0.00071484066,0.0021583086,0.00005380005,0.0009500825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9719644,0.00908845,0.008646907,0.0018591697,0.0077935574,0.0006473853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7998377,0.112926826,0.024033546,0.0041307835,0.05609364,0.0029774832],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030563042,0.0015200785,0.003046421,0.076716185,0.0018635642,0.0068266285,0.0017786422,0.0033035432,0.008264532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12218161,0.0013140204,0.0033155633,0.05068586,0.00222999,0.008893411,0.0035332865,0.0026298172,0.0029525259],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016338062,0.0000921868,0.0026952266,0.21026199,0.000743391,0.00032705368,0.0010379748,0.0004215328,0.0012617344,0.005221538,0.07769788,0.7000761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039381885,0.0002046072,0.011583365,0.4336549,0.0016926103,0.00079015095,0.0015603194,0.00028727608,0.00055392773,0.0033849622,0.54614955,0.000098960736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005455131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014352678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96943694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077975583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028849162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16163474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131415998","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2020-0323","title":"Knowledge sharing as a give-and-take practice: the role of the knowledge receiver in the knowledge-sharing process","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge sharing; Openness to experience; Knowledge management; Knowledge value chain; Business; Unit (ring theory); Originality; Knowledge economy; Process (computing); Value (mathematics); Work (physics); Personal knowledge management; Organizational learning; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03269904870615884,"score_gpt":0.3449813144883399,"score_spread":0.31228226578218105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131415998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9820279,0.0003571994,0.004648223,0.0009556477,0.000016620688,0.00006204324,0.000010521878,0.000019265042,0.0119024925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983011,0.00010495631,0.0008415236,0.000065423046,0.000008196092,0.000013053537,0.000005155932,0.0000032438516,0.00065722497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878116,0.008277311,0.0005394479,0.00075311126,0.0015321856,0.0010863892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520603,0.028559817,0.010817178,0.0032490632,0.0022509273,0.003062712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011776212,0.00035985874,0.0004210245,0.0013202268,0.0035947775,0.0068269093,0.00093104324,0.001510013,0.0032472766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033496633,0.00045308095,0.00038816675,0.0008569309,0.0055899913,0.004856302,0.0046200445,0.0014729552,0.00033334614],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051519123,0.0010215375,0.50970805,0.00057062187,0.0002433671,0.0011349719,0.34097317,0.00080481323,0.006452293,0.015363354,0.0006214751,0.12259126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012372273,0.0014455598,0.5210579,0.0012619259,0.00052983564,0.0020215756,0.4141829,0.007942868,0.0055132853,0.024917444,0.020742077,0.00026087376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004776349,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037369074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011776212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021056582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045271916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062279284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3138884011","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2019-0611","title":"Frogs in boiling water: a moderated-mediation model of exploitative leadership, fear of negative evaluation and knowledge hiding behaviors","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Moderated mediation; Originality; Mediation; Social psychology; Value (mathematics); Creativity","score_opus":0.12570617495680705,"score_gpt":0.36332307381983764,"score_spread":0.23761689886303058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3138884011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95682627,0.0005105801,0.011749929,0.002451226,0.00008620971,0.0004257787,0.00025876175,0.00007285385,0.027618313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944478,0.00021239478,0.00306133,0.000112193164,0.000013269269,0.00019551578,0.00005108317,0.0000063187517,0.0018999486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982901,0.0009564587,0.000051263283,0.00025851428,0.00019345417,0.00025009204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953341,0.0026808998,0.0008545864,0.00027165085,0.00040890966,0.0004499023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002043423,0.001049758,0.0005091378,0.0008217945,0.0011928856,0.0020680577,0.0015166381,0.0009901093,0.009068924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062259044,0.0005239729,0.0012195552,0.00040058797,0.0011507138,0.0015596627,0.0019121469,0.0016236348,0.00047628948],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023676872,0.0112383505,0.669571,0.0016418495,0.0028374244,0.004258524,0.05085891,0.013039552,0.0071515045,0.11655569,0.0044468185,0.11603279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009424215,0.0053228587,0.59415686,0.0014500228,0.0042011137,0.0026094401,0.040673945,0.16925734,0.0044521852,0.16352719,0.013135673,0.00027106312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075796004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006223094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009068924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001354797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026599637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030338585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176073091","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2020-0530","title":"The influence mechanism of rewards on knowledge sharing behaviors in virtual communities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Knowledge sharing; Tacit knowledge; Virtual community; Explicit knowledge; Virtual organization; Context (archaeology); Incentive; Originality; Computer science; Psychology; The Internet; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Creativity","score_opus":0.033775663677179886,"score_gpt":0.32565138325033083,"score_spread":0.29187571957315095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176073091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9831935,0.0002085056,0.004636309,0.00037634574,0.000018071476,0.0000626589,0.000030912215,0.000028919094,0.011444756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99895215,0.0000356029,0.00061865617,0.00001501318,0.0000051794136,0.000022877874,0.0000052965747,0.0000028573447,0.00034235028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969496,0.0017660114,0.00010345143,0.00039808024,0.0004005865,0.00038234802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9612649,0.026419045,0.0062039476,0.0016970049,0.0015752454,0.0028397758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003406782,0.00038245448,0.00043405147,0.0012009506,0.0013540863,0.0021909059,0.0005175156,0.0006525459,0.006436507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03297626,0.00030469635,0.00048400892,0.0005228227,0.001676643,0.001960464,0.00206429,0.00072505034,0.00031210776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021125937,0.002825534,0.734327,0.0007235061,0.00049747183,0.001402121,0.01862135,0.009720192,0.008507677,0.069333516,0.0012292659,0.15069972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028264773,0.0014583056,0.847996,0.0003848029,0.0006367021,0.000764158,0.012162048,0.04963287,0.004704002,0.07575619,0.00606615,0.00015607743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021872262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020052562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006436507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011255533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017081267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021532238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191634878","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2020-0774","title":"Individual knowledge measurement: organizational knowledge measured at the individual level","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Tacit knowledge; Respondent; Knowledge management; Investment (military); Body of knowledge; Knowledge sharing; Organizational learning; Knowledge value chain; Originality; Production (economics); Business; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Creativity; Economics; Microeconomics; Political science","score_opus":0.08811359055949279,"score_gpt":0.2498141944039675,"score_spread":0.1617006038444747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191634878","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9432043,0.00049044983,0.027743306,0.00038892168,0.000034076642,0.00039294417,0.0013448793,0.00007157244,0.026329603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99028945,0.00010660994,0.0083694635,0.000051306833,0.00001682396,0.00021871645,0.00034140534,0.00000620378,0.00059999275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99107003,0.0038664893,0.0010831129,0.0010187721,0.002637594,0.00032392895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93003994,0.03523466,0.015849883,0.0081523415,0.009042548,0.0016806173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083451215,0.00027954657,0.00037293,0.004141985,0.0007433351,0.0020678618,0.00069082517,0.0004972116,0.002230041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041299287,0.00013155887,0.00035586106,0.003652497,0.0013365237,0.0028932076,0.0017943897,0.000647456,0.0003567497],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026789485,0.00038419795,0.8032035,0.0008039195,0.00026729642,0.000061703315,0.0063274764,0.0013003633,0.0024925186,0.007884569,0.0009839908,0.17602253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024016357,0.0010117568,0.9541464,0.00049887167,0.00017445741,0.00024490635,0.007862482,0.0050525432,0.0047969893,0.018595988,0.0075133983,0.000078145946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017263243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022712823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0083451215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009320461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014422601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044133782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3196041735","doi":"10.1108/jkm-09-2020-0722","title":"Leader knowledge hiding and employee organizational identification in the Egyptian service industry","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Bootstrapping (finance); Mediation; Moderated mediation; Moderation; Psychology; Agreeableness; Social psychology; Organizational identification; Tertiary sector of the economy; Originality; Knowledge management; Personality; Marketing; Business; Organizational commitment; Big Five personality traits; Creativity; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04718398265434265,"score_gpt":0.32845649400001153,"score_spread":0.2812725113456689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3196041735","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993331,0.00003311034,0.000037983464,0.000065448156,0.0000011940822,0.0000021881356,0.0000046560576,5.1209236e-7,0.00052175124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972624,0.000025605397,0.000034144585,0.000012772291,0.0000011310589,0.0000016586167,0.000006099275,2.105146e-7,0.00019209672],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921536,0.000260492,0.00004766291,0.00007144925,0.00020887032,0.00019613748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952642,0.0013723762,0.0022490255,0.00016660432,0.00036704142,0.0005807347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014488664,0.00014789627,0.00016665136,0.0005022759,0.0010409782,0.0011169438,0.0002470293,0.00033019995,0.002501479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035480286,0.0000972776,0.00014441126,0.00040456612,0.0005864202,0.0004297362,0.00094557717,0.00053785025,0.00014241706],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006865686,0.00029736105,0.97302216,0.00004929709,0.000029348063,0.00018643425,0.011456049,0.000109730405,0.0005102322,0.00031996914,0.00015227034,0.013798419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004155152,0.00012076164,0.9655636,0.000034309374,0.000015288859,0.00009304951,0.03284928,0.00037165076,0.0003123852,0.00017550749,0.00045278724,0.000007252977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005193466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010222121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005193466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007998763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018681606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010326505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209197933","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2021-0231","title":"Perceived organizational politics, knowledge hiding and diminished promotability: how do harmony motives matter?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Harmony (color); Politics; Compromise; Promotion (chess); Psychology; Dysfunctional family; Originality; Phenomenon; Public relations; Extant taxon; Social psychology; Business; Marketing; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.015121250649451952,"score_gpt":0.23765654175688952,"score_spread":0.22253529110743758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209197933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.997572,0.00012040405,0.00037640534,0.00023304613,0.0000059107974,0.000014931225,0.000011722805,0.0000024333167,0.0016631256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970526,0.00002638235,0.000107575375,0.00003337628,0.0000044641383,0.000006126044,0.0000064698243,0.0000011407902,0.00010922902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972588,0.0013507766,0.00016901059,0.0003005925,0.0005255477,0.0003952126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9768685,0.012121203,0.0068455646,0.0015281404,0.00067796395,0.0019585274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035242203,0.00021600277,0.00032022467,0.00052333256,0.0009743473,0.002438646,0.00033308438,0.0005081318,0.0033621644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012514613,0.00022952289,0.00032756932,0.00038026518,0.002512773,0.0011287867,0.001597857,0.0008932056,0.00016802514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020554487,0.00043330318,0.9652936,0.00011062131,0.00012377379,0.00012296572,0.012605761,0.000099688725,0.0009855983,0.0017771649,0.00010306537,0.01813885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008564671,0.00020951813,0.98057693,0.00005513951,0.00005004858,0.00008616469,0.016343672,0.000309298,0.0003340579,0.0013631335,0.000649168,0.000014411888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012137942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019298182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035242203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054956484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011806751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018638074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200007548","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2021-0069","title":"How does organizational learning contribute to corporate social responsibility and innovation performance? The dynamic capability view","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate social responsibility; Knowledge management; Antecedent (behavioral psychology); Originality; Structural equation modeling; Bridge (graph theory); Context (archaeology); Dynamic capabilities; Business; Test (biology); Value (mathematics); Perspective (graphical); Organizational performance; Social responsibility; Computer science; Public relations; Psychology; Sociology; Qualitative research; Political science","score_opus":0.023737270398915565,"score_gpt":0.26129360683720254,"score_spread":0.23755633643828697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200007548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88128394,0.002670887,0.009105721,0.012951945,0.000088410714,0.00006915495,0.00007435548,0.0000372605,0.09371824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99926156,0.00022565782,0.00024003015,0.000063486455,0.000015050031,0.0000052917817,0.000005099531,0.0000015966384,0.0001822177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970469,0.0014724431,0.00010183176,0.00032803393,0.0004877759,0.0005629869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98041064,0.010273433,0.004237068,0.000965109,0.0016229101,0.00249094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003858066,0.00048269652,0.00026660188,0.0028354807,0.0011147264,0.004965901,0.0007522233,0.0008963302,0.0020290858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012219862,0.00015754573,0.0006092054,0.001544669,0.008079589,0.0055056256,0.004259185,0.0011701615,0.00015804391],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016831489,0.0007370067,0.51723677,0.00059094344,0.00041948244,0.0007371413,0.023768995,0.007224675,0.0011167246,0.288808,0.0014659791,0.15772606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006891008,0.00054581393,0.40268454,0.001200571,0.00039071357,0.0006184366,0.061000194,0.016118865,0.0017688209,0.49437842,0.021087721,0.00013707491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041056788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034749827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004965901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032093157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004742104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023285389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4225011412","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2021-0601","title":"Green talent management and employees’ innovative work behavior: the roles of artificial intelligence and transformational leadership","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Business and Economic Development","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":180,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Oxford Instruments (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Competitive advantage; Knowledge management; Structural equation modeling; Originality; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Work behavior; Business; Sustainability; Emotional intelligence; Psychology; Marketing; Creativity; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05401954798763566,"score_gpt":0.2399478940805622,"score_spread":0.18592834609292652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4225011412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99746764,0.000082910745,0.00021725276,0.00011779184,0.0000044073868,0.000008891745,0.0000071913946,0.0000026782961,0.0020912571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996314,0.000029776935,0.00009854924,0.00001749516,0.0000036956403,0.000004546114,0.0000049360783,5.197143e-7,0.00020911018],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992086,0.0002989097,0.000037905247,0.00008053973,0.00020260781,0.00017148872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458057,0.0020789586,0.0018271923,0.00025585908,0.00031510336,0.000942262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011728302,0.00023796632,0.00019412872,0.0007543252,0.00088885956,0.0018547934,0.0002596774,0.00025247736,0.0026734255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002546282,0.000087470136,0.0002635256,0.00042240237,0.00096835644,0.00048330077,0.0009778584,0.00057066913,0.00016434334],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016987749,0.0010976748,0.91268843,0.00020732007,0.00016443545,0.00032067118,0.013993486,0.0009617462,0.0026867734,0.0023389857,0.0004046067,0.06496598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054146567,0.00018774277,0.9874988,0.000045449695,0.000029657833,0.000072020346,0.009196778,0.00081742316,0.00044348915,0.0008055376,0.0008838085,0.000013833986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012009415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022996801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0026734255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007226181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011201202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008943498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249464209","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2016-0490","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: 2017 update","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Intellectual capital; Knowledge management; Journal ranking; Originality; Impact factor; Computer science; Business; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Information retrieval; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.034241585033589365,"score_gpt":0.297022467744272,"score_spread":0.2627808827106826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249464209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5125306,0.12451449,0.00868119,0.03777946,0.013521087,0.0008550497,0.14001493,0.0029985802,0.15910462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7789667,0.06581127,0.02198238,0.003896698,0.006942066,0.00043941554,0.10151376,0.00083494716,0.019612744],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98914003,0.0009946732,0.0019306975,0.00064159534,0.00651552,0.00077746395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90662575,0.011477185,0.017373875,0.0029074852,0.05699758,0.0046181628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00961424,0.0009941345,0.00102648,0.05161597,0.00093242,0.008104214,0.0009232044,0.0006637907,0.0061803213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030167855,0.00025991196,0.0008518054,0.05658493,0.0010322001,0.005470006,0.0026014464,0.0009960476,0.0042334646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035005796,0.0001726601,0.22866346,0.0045900233,0.000333335,0.0003162531,0.0009393847,0.0008685464,0.0016938039,0.0045978213,0.18013248,0.57734215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005302501,0.00037049866,0.60433763,0.0025627885,0.000459441,0.0012559438,0.0032747507,0.0010471769,0.0029972394,0.0022453894,0.38122037,0.00017572932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006605348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084545165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002853819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008253304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050845563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252598960","doi":"10.1108/jkm-11-2020-0814","title":"Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals: a 2021 update","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Intellectual Capital and Performance Analysis","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Citation; Knowledge management; Journal ranking; Citation impact; Citation analysis; Impact factor; Intellectual capital; Bibliometrics; Computer science; Originality; Index (typography); Sociology; Library science; Political science; World Wide Web; Social science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.0203195703006584,"score_gpt":0.26762982175652134,"score_spread":0.24731025145586294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252598960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31303948,0.18021116,0.020598916,0.12382603,0.04046199,0.0015892482,0.124860756,0.009484922,0.18592747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65354365,0.09033211,0.0707846,0.011011196,0.012003837,0.0011573337,0.12070826,0.0013904624,0.039068606],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870703,0.0017891686,0.0022472586,0.00077586964,0.0072546415,0.00086272176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8870045,0.011148192,0.013938059,0.0031237996,0.07754334,0.0072422363],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013142146,0.0014618511,0.0013029377,0.046965256,0.0013598909,0.010936142,0.0013214207,0.0012374216,0.00997154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03826085,0.00048874057,0.0009998035,0.03845801,0.00094272906,0.007707476,0.002642647,0.0013687088,0.008968143],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003431142,0.00018510206,0.066028506,0.0040965863,0.00020232252,0.00026387983,0.0005281509,0.0013328403,0.0018846533,0.0055152676,0.24590115,0.6737185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000770686,0.0006656231,0.31458673,0.003019288,0.0002597882,0.0012392078,0.0023530636,0.0023839702,0.0020563833,0.003645567,0.6694669,0.00024632382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064046797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063993507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98685783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039548418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010841615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06950319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4282826187","doi":"10.1108/jkm-12-2021-0920","title":"The Great Resignation: the great knowledge exodus or the onset of the Great Knowledge Revolution?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Organizational learning; Knowledge value chain; Knowledge economy; Personal knowledge management; Human capital; Competitive advantage; Knowledge worker; Business; Computer science; Marketing; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.04600786100243058,"score_gpt":0.3153302455460807,"score_spread":0.2693223845436501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4282826187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27615008,0.036313195,0.0126312785,0.25957352,0.003968379,0.00009895972,0.00029005672,0.00026447975,0.41071004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9738833,0.004939376,0.0015394218,0.008215561,0.0010848532,0.000038340713,0.000058118174,0.000055501354,0.010185525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973634,0.00086409843,0.00008949331,0.00052081916,0.0005393386,0.000622906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914169,0.004531885,0.0013535321,0.0013953451,0.00049252476,0.00080990535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045070173,0.0002455923,0.00042213127,0.0014718847,0.0040165223,0.010358098,0.0010930633,0.0037686045,0.008127368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011063847,0.00019419685,0.00038936254,0.0019819716,0.032257825,0.021504084,0.0054726345,0.0051998706,0.00085959816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074033705,0.00003630837,0.0021502895,0.00015422165,0.000009700075,0.0010046603,0.022140214,0.00013978883,0.0002908405,0.9289646,0.013819344,0.031215988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018447317,0.00009736561,0.008129421,0.00071041234,0.000014296356,0.0019500852,0.06530833,0.0005770104,0.00074161805,0.47016674,0.45221296,0.00007319249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001678272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016874158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010358098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039287643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002486816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028505325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4288084171","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2021-0622","title":"Knowledge sharing processes and the role of attachment patterns","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University; University of Alberta; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Equifinality; Knowledge sharing; Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Underpinning; Social psychology; Action (physics); Knowledge management; Computer science","score_opus":0.023060267449535207,"score_gpt":0.30379217364456396,"score_spread":0.28073190619502875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4288084171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99292713,0.00011590228,0.0024528254,0.00015934286,0.0000058371297,0.000034590757,0.00001704865,0.00000811827,0.00427934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989926,0.0000697958,0.00069647,0.000016215008,0.000002841528,0.000011863436,0.000014739496,0.0000016571452,0.00019377205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628735,0.0019453289,0.0002969639,0.00036934853,0.0007277979,0.00037323678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97199494,0.016424203,0.0063449848,0.0024634986,0.0012241614,0.0015482098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004939232,0.00034252636,0.00025802388,0.0010861575,0.0015731878,0.002689186,0.00060912437,0.00056220917,0.002381921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03203251,0.00026492978,0.000379198,0.0007553657,0.0018024653,0.0020622301,0.0032393425,0.0010359737,0.00013822877],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026158808,0.0004879541,0.84931874,0.00021213281,0.00018107652,0.00047260092,0.058889046,0.00096102187,0.003397683,0.008208869,0.00016327293,0.07744601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002042012,0.0005819249,0.9303206,0.00021621236,0.000113412934,0.00089987763,0.04226538,0.004199336,0.0011752634,0.01777536,0.0023683815,0.000063873485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022804283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018056424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.004939232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007900349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000787269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026121438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292298019","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2022-0029","title":"Antecedents and consequences of knowledge sabotage in the Turkish telecommunication and retail sectors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge worker; Organizational justice; Business; Interactional justice; Incivility; Structural equation modeling; Originality; Psychology; Turkish; Value (mathematics); Social psychology; Public relations; Organizational commitment; Political science","score_opus":0.040356204109439714,"score_gpt":0.3146672408366291,"score_spread":0.2743110367271894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292298019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99872774,0.00009910659,0.00014081495,0.000114685325,0.0000029839734,0.00001233148,0.000024229303,0.0000035944674,0.00087455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999767,0.00003718162,0.00006714857,0.000011395432,0.0000022096997,0.000004828757,0.000021343729,6.4970067e-7,0.00008811971],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779993,0.0005279407,0.00026661792,0.00025407496,0.0005367683,0.00061460846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98450005,0.0045253993,0.0074855955,0.0009157817,0.0010129048,0.0015603098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001301605,0.00032237658,0.0003327007,0.0017831586,0.0015670812,0.002245799,0.0006350341,0.0008670044,0.0031552447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008843785,0.00032801993,0.00051988533,0.0012778899,0.0015909116,0.0007372009,0.0021519011,0.0007544732,0.00024100681],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007346945,0.00026287974,0.98705137,0.000059460617,0.000030943163,0.0004583683,0.0037722604,0.00026699656,0.00035359123,0.00029518476,0.000096945,0.0072785732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038036326,0.00009192799,0.98671025,0.000046024637,0.000019732695,0.00020197628,0.011167298,0.0008536817,0.00017311423,0.00039049206,0.0003308409,0.000010794975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013686613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0115300575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013686613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017435314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029289117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027213931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4316672444","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2021-0796","title":"Personality disorders as a predictor of counterproductive knowledge behavior: the application of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-IV","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Personality Traits and Psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Personality disorders; Psychology; Personality; Originality; Context (archaeology); Sadistic personality disorder; Clinical psychology; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Creativity","score_opus":0.0505103819311926,"score_gpt":0.40762189108478064,"score_spread":0.357111509153588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4316672444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998104,0.0002890087,0.00018558753,0.000105501524,0.00001427586,0.00005773288,0.00017386052,0.0000052748096,0.00106484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99880993,0.00011417518,0.0006680071,0.000029926508,0.000010997007,0.00004445483,0.00014682335,0.0000016682801,0.00017404555],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852043,0.0006085601,0.00026588282,0.00015305687,0.0003347571,0.00011729548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99130005,0.0024793856,0.004470272,0.0005091252,0.00050277275,0.00073844724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021195333,0.0003296118,0.0002759363,0.0009914667,0.0004819326,0.0011798419,0.00036613236,0.00046073765,0.0018844635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009203598,0.00024178103,0.00059242814,0.00066894747,0.00032471248,0.0004512102,0.0008507023,0.0009488689,0.00022283346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006001073,0.00007902523,0.9961928,0.000025134615,0.000043829652,0.000027338008,0.00016866032,0.000031342704,0.00010473136,0.0000125192855,0.000080996215,0.0031736733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004505199,0.000088517416,0.9990729,0.000018119523,0.000023431461,0.000080713624,0.00022842365,0.00024706358,0.000054418968,0.000027665781,0.00015025947,0.0000039288484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022894202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035969915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022894202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038498142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054455805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0112092495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4321787789","doi":"10.1108/jkm-04-2022-0277","title":"Knowledge assets, innovation ambidexterity and firm performance in knowledge-intensive companies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Ambidexterity; Knowledge management; Business; Orchestration; Mediation; Originality; Resource (disambiguation); Value (mathematics); Structural equation modeling; Industrial organization; Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.040623715732266294,"score_gpt":0.28427196430003704,"score_spread":0.24364824856777073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4321787789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99745995,0.00007941574,0.00013816815,0.000061910534,0.0000011012532,0.000008791221,0.000018729777,0.0000021668225,0.0022297911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998379,0.000020429694,0.00004048962,0.0000037939187,0.0000014204636,0.0000021008834,0.00001207364,1.90629e-7,0.000081611135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990176,0.00028535942,0.00009131079,0.00009224521,0.00030588947,0.00020746802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834087,0.006886997,0.0065552252,0.0006681122,0.00089207484,0.0015887915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017377265,0.00020060726,0.00021325,0.0018642924,0.00043056675,0.0018631766,0.00027927483,0.000355847,0.0022590659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009210997,0.00007223023,0.00021052043,0.0013597588,0.0010157707,0.0012400588,0.0015092223,0.00041637258,0.00017435288],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006168395,0.00029364802,0.9783029,0.000033864224,0.00006236163,0.00012476958,0.0007175941,0.0017566141,0.00027711425,0.0015768661,0.000086314656,0.016706249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008251762,0.00023920674,0.99119097,0.000041477528,0.000033494172,0.00010675667,0.002191099,0.0027557535,0.0005058027,0.00239222,0.000522342,0.0000125387005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002138202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021596043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0022590659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00095369073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010438632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009190083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362669242","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2022-0792","title":"The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting: recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":199,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; Burnout; Business; Public relations; Human resource management; Human capital; Perspective (graphical); Value (mathematics); Psychology; Political science; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.05273482374607948,"score_gpt":0.405537287506806,"score_spread":0.35280246376072655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362669242","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061801495,0.018778717,0.0008382933,0.9728238,0.0029329811,0.00003763518,0.000026777589,0.00003357714,0.003910183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12964216,0.12179225,0.020543149,0.70192057,0.011357198,0.0014343278,0.00020311186,0.00010595812,0.013001323],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848866,0.009925807,0.0006451111,0.0007491181,0.0016837148,0.0021095506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.922889,0.041491598,0.003387996,0.0018224843,0.0107038915,0.019705031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033848032,0.0016264484,0.0021624402,0.0041948296,0.0108284755,0.017759642,0.0060730013,0.017087216,0.011654587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045244936,0.0007415017,0.0016313717,0.0036735719,0.01916651,0.028812354,0.013013574,0.03432673,0.0023083934],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010547394,0.00069687795,0.0043178853,0.002332691,0.000066053464,0.0007376478,0.023449332,0.00041807294,0.00019929002,0.20760019,0.6258203,0.1342561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011060605,0.0001785514,0.005342009,0.02137524,0.0001246554,0.00045914215,0.154754,0.0007659003,0.00024181887,0.24003486,0.57638407,0.00022915396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020545771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036466714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033848032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014136602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07092129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17900765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388509690","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2023-0013","title":"Is competence without humility wasted in building the trust necessary for knowledge transfer in younger/older worker dyads?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Mary's University","funders":"","keywords":"Competence (human resources); Psychology; Humility; Originality; Social psychology; Workforce; Thematic analysis; Knowledge transfer; Reflexivity; Social exchange theory; Phenomenon; Interdependence; Distrust; Qualitative research; Public relations; Sociology; Knowledge management; Political science; Epistemology; Creativity","score_opus":0.18510392030025435,"score_gpt":0.4316723844119766,"score_spread":0.24656846411172223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388509690","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9851547,0.0009322182,0.0032077937,0.0033977232,0.00007218302,0.000040794144,0.000020866095,0.000013803226,0.0071598827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985562,0.00021860485,0.00049382774,0.0002453218,0.00001134707,0.000023526478,0.000007269074,0.0000041880985,0.0004397677],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902401,0.0068023866,0.00033096506,0.0006779063,0.0006813658,0.0012672507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874499,0.005920987,0.0022951309,0.00072757114,0.0010180735,0.0025882572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010961572,0.0003333487,0.00066549046,0.0013412297,0.006705045,0.0062610013,0.00093758083,0.0011797419,0.0022022119],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021231076,0.0005071152,0.00034657083,0.0006003095,0.008847786,0.005238116,0.009622539,0.0016751902,0.00028299485],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099396304,0.00009608743,0.058475513,0.00020777818,0.000037340145,0.0016220694,0.9069172,0.000050009687,0.0010018917,0.0078528095,0.00072790345,0.022911957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014938885,0.00015347436,0.032361664,0.0002645742,0.000034843866,0.0010714969,0.9505145,0.00027205914,0.00041534618,0.0071566775,0.0077010496,0.000039335235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009873569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01216442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010961572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003124355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054435846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05797106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391963668","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2023-0713","title":"Practical wisdom in the workplace: conceptualization, instrument development, and predictive power","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Nomological network; Conceptualization; Knowledge management; Operationalization; Originality; Psychology; Value (mathematics); Salient; Computer science; Social psychology; Creativity; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04392570269415603,"score_gpt":0.3497701530641831,"score_spread":0.30584445037002705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391963668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85202277,0.0021322293,0.12275214,0.0040751337,0.00031255343,0.004591958,0.00065185723,0.0002545526,0.013206929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92178243,0.0005563853,0.07028237,0.0006098024,0.00009647748,0.005726922,0.00049437373,0.000035435598,0.00041579513],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9664597,0.02026978,0.0026141147,0.0025572558,0.0073003275,0.0007987988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74975044,0.20225058,0.012310413,0.018252036,0.015308569,0.0021281166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06824227,0.0005939858,0.00091951864,0.004465708,0.0021143237,0.0061672674,0.0018330817,0.0017487496,0.0029518004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20003544,0.0005854791,0.0012049582,0.0052174274,0.0051064785,0.0052261166,0.0055055027,0.0028976295,0.00061948755],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028698434,0.0013683459,0.6666866,0.0014218574,0.0003091164,0.00019777281,0.021859853,0.002993653,0.0007056883,0.023068536,0.0037212174,0.27738044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036702343,0.0022152867,0.62342846,0.00693836,0.0008631216,0.0010458722,0.07090372,0.061452225,0.0033049555,0.20572346,0.023331575,0.00042594943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014781514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002126022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06824227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020971817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055830777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36090392},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4397009542","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2023-0468","title":"Selection of a business school dean: a multi-criteria knowledge-based approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.058518731537647216,"score_gpt":0.3635759311807552,"score_spread":0.305057199643108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4397009542","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43492374,0.00489666,0.4395951,0.010221005,0.00038897948,0.06849002,0.0017539411,0.00058753305,0.039143033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5460384,0.0005053109,0.44006062,0.00070122734,0.00010877831,0.010161849,0.00066731015,0.00006363126,0.0016927887],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.950775,0.03011253,0.0048333746,0.0030170253,0.009281778,0.0019804146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116709,0.057498142,0.0061727925,0.001856497,0.018419322,0.0043822755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05079115,0.0012943372,0.003922382,0.02689512,0.0063678264,0.011463047,0.004909301,0.0038986893,0.008190954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09031006,0.0009829552,0.003745837,0.015332091,0.00293191,0.003770798,0.008192205,0.0026062527,0.0009684944],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033394597,0.0056933877,0.122088164,0.015385455,0.0041194335,0.003217755,0.03645219,0.03446154,0.0074182046,0.029055873,0.016084881,0.7226836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028868788,0.007960733,0.14550716,0.012346463,0.0065950295,0.0031440856,0.13549742,0.45557842,0.008441493,0.15918195,0.061254535,0.0016059137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004709729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010642504,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05079115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0115493825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016193222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26861256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400013799","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2023-0563","title":"Knowledge management is no more a gray area in the tourism industry in India – a study on transformation leadership and executive communication","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Innovation and Knowledge Management","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Becton Dickinson (Canada); University Canada West","funders":"","keywords":"Tourism; Knowledge management; Business; Gray (unit); Transformation (genetics); Hospitality management studies; Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.052892097948277796,"score_gpt":0.2967732006937594,"score_spread":0.2438811027454816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400013799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96268433,0.0006334929,0.00024360148,0.0037138185,0.000033845965,0.000024334779,0.000010839796,0.000008194246,0.032647528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99789953,0.0003308507,0.000053348947,0.00020415938,0.000011759759,0.0000051374873,0.0000064060355,0.0000016759565,0.001487077],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983669,0.00056404463,0.000099314944,0.000111676745,0.00034790288,0.00051020086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950781,0.0019238656,0.0009390898,0.0002273461,0.00052383763,0.0013077308],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013180991,0.00012937891,0.00013586755,0.0012457413,0.0046714065,0.0044402527,0.0005112335,0.00041750816,0.003540772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003422696,0.00014022824,0.00017250393,0.0020429038,0.0023791795,0.0017760788,0.0021922353,0.001205193,0.00029451033],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077890894,0.0007629338,0.23467776,0.00061659236,0.00003080173,0.0056818975,0.5798538,0.00022362631,0.002126699,0.024700074,0.00711372,0.14413427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057555935,0.00014067987,0.25008944,0.00037800986,0.000023486595,0.0015741927,0.70371926,0.00027978496,0.00046321432,0.0015126055,0.041786462,0.000027174186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009950854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012127263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009950854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026393498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00819869,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019785881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400584736","doi":"10.1108/jkm-08-2023-0711","title":"Technostress and disengagement from knowledge sharing: insights from pre-pandemic and mid-pandemic data sets","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Technostress in Professional Settings","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland; HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Technostress; Pandemic; Knowledge management; Disengagement theory; Knowledge sharing; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Computer science; Business; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.05892012277804705,"score_gpt":0.38494633696242114,"score_spread":0.3260262141843741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400584736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944133,0.0002843592,0.0019061739,0.0008017405,0.000008485052,0.000034045206,0.00044315835,0.000009261487,0.0020994737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973133,0.00014728807,0.0016037257,0.0000879634,0.0000058591586,0.00003766885,0.0005763708,0.000007011151,0.00022076257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602675,0.0022880128,0.00031642368,0.00034877483,0.00053518725,0.0004848534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480335,0.037794158,0.0065930337,0.0034346564,0.0025791805,0.0015654213],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008663711,0.00023181234,0.00036326668,0.0023094092,0.0015334849,0.0032259661,0.00095234875,0.0005925462,0.001349548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03211821,0.00025854027,0.00052644196,0.0036657127,0.0016357548,0.0036867002,0.0038924168,0.0013829092,0.00021284919],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024773175,0.00027821132,0.86041737,0.00044517056,0.00015924111,0.0005076149,0.09188361,0.001070826,0.0008308232,0.002798955,0.00096177397,0.040398628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012184419,0.00014056107,0.83152246,0.00034355035,0.00004467565,0.0002565234,0.15217327,0.0038281484,0.00056428177,0.004801262,0.0062673916,0.000045799043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011615117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026697211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011615117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017686472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002767471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045818627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402067851","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2023-0602","title":"Impact of entrepreneurship on technological innovation in the digital age: a knowledge management perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Digital Marketing and Social Media","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Knowledge management; Entrepreneurship; Business; Innovation management; Computer science","score_opus":0.03315373062956209,"score_gpt":0.36454522224313624,"score_spread":0.3313914916135742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402067851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42451,0.0062793233,0.008449931,0.012323614,0.00015867132,0.000063114974,0.000051221265,0.000027672937,0.54813653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955716,0.0012086075,0.0004975901,0.0002273396,0.00005412518,0.000012851628,0.000005878077,0.0000023596488,0.0024196885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874663,0.00047981404,0.00005205678,0.0001156644,0.00027568045,0.0003302428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954072,0.0028652265,0.00061056844,0.00017279008,0.00034966043,0.0005945732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015366707,0.00019364401,0.000194475,0.0021106638,0.001620711,0.0057908664,0.00042457,0.0009190233,0.004726572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037503792,0.000108959866,0.00039364723,0.0014134665,0.0052869357,0.0043960353,0.0038295302,0.0009244851,0.00024934686],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052445022,0.0004069954,0.03582151,0.00040095503,0.000048924336,0.0021038956,0.013011159,0.0019103143,0.0011612158,0.83569086,0.0015448062,0.10784701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005358965,0.00030331447,0.110997595,0.001521751,0.00017067436,0.0028233193,0.06289835,0.0076355417,0.0038821197,0.6435741,0.16605102,0.00008865716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010975949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00089490373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057908664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019682064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023137596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01581192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410359793","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2023-0653","title":"It’s mine but you took it: knowledge theft as a barrier to organizational knowledge management efforts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research; Centre for Global Health Research; The Scarborough Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Knowledge management; Business; Organizational learning; Computer science","score_opus":0.017249254207558625,"score_gpt":0.3190049481554359,"score_spread":0.30175569394787727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410359793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9912446,0.00051326334,0.0011106426,0.0024684262,0.00002938379,0.000037723883,0.000015632902,0.0000097096145,0.0045705475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989054,0.00017171387,0.00039934396,0.0002593972,0.0000069292346,0.000018657334,0.0000075689036,0.0000044131507,0.0002265724],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851221,0.008327847,0.0009186318,0.0006853061,0.0035028725,0.0014432941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8817987,0.07554446,0.027675696,0.0053873765,0.004390822,0.005202944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015435506,0.00022719537,0.00053881854,0.0015512052,0.004472822,0.005417272,0.0013526073,0.0016618646,0.0024186645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08729931,0.00042505754,0.00032404513,0.001317838,0.0065236674,0.005562511,0.005846665,0.0035362712,0.00021855797],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003022723,0.00083687366,0.4478034,0.00073914614,0.00017172228,0.0019054905,0.40155604,0.00021663845,0.0015026687,0.012297376,0.0034214803,0.12924686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004335459,0.00046586845,0.2625111,0.0016492154,0.00015959982,0.0028806885,0.70471394,0.001542204,0.0012823252,0.01007627,0.014554889,0.0001205794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053377445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059338477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015435506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023816423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006110632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08163172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413290168","doi":"10.1108/jkm-01-2025-0061","title":"Functional and dysfunctional personality dispositions as antecedents of practical wisdom","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cultural Differences and Values","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Dysfunctional family; Psychology; Personality; Knowledge management; Social psychology; Computer science; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.07210289298463288,"score_gpt":0.4063125034734886,"score_spread":0.33420961048885567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413290168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99367213,0.00028877115,0.00091278687,0.00034461395,0.000024365194,0.00003770805,0.00007670582,0.000011766596,0.004631171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991124,0.00006927469,0.00050560693,0.000028774704,0.000005975164,0.00001207577,0.00003363456,0.0000016111578,0.0002305827],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841666,0.0006121749,0.00016881645,0.00015402577,0.00044743318,0.00020095454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97885257,0.008750906,0.006303258,0.0018942254,0.0015494772,0.0026494884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027530105,0.00022170346,0.00032760116,0.0012860757,0.0009909397,0.0017509109,0.00031241114,0.00039694473,0.0035732703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016976802,0.00019765091,0.00035438733,0.00084189273,0.0011800617,0.0007522535,0.0013095988,0.00095866213,0.0002634462],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011437795,0.0002525731,0.951741,0.00015812028,0.000087541106,0.00040347868,0.0074853785,0.0003907028,0.00060537504,0.0017918368,0.00063458644,0.03633504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008328603,0.00009461881,0.98892236,0.00007354416,0.000026222579,0.000296173,0.005973171,0.00064847525,0.00012615943,0.0027333573,0.0010785356,0.000019075385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014386189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027237649,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0035732703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000800397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014193112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014559448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414418793","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2024-1216","title":"Breaking the flow: how do workplace hazing and co-worker bullying disrupt employee knowledge sharing?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Alienation; Counterproductive work behavior; Structural equation modeling; Moderation; Workplace bullying; Extant taxon; Association (psychology); Affect (linguistics); Knowledge sharing; Social exchange theory","score_opus":0.02156651984005254,"score_gpt":0.33943348088750824,"score_spread":0.3178669610474557,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414418793","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99474466,0.0007473814,0.00079284504,0.0015185288,0.00002814725,0.00003345445,0.00004718635,0.000011208285,0.0020766677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990476,0.00021568395,0.00019128286,0.00019845212,0.000011844395,0.00002114109,0.000022186818,0.0000027126403,0.00028918264],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972631,0.0010835003,0.00016772325,0.00042348943,0.00046986155,0.0005923459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986186,0.005797051,0.0052029835,0.00079242524,0.0006593771,0.0013621422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003338241,0.00031441968,0.0005268508,0.000736895,0.0023252168,0.0034476747,0.001023979,0.0014630028,0.00306082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016189363,0.00048901804,0.00074176386,0.000570695,0.002558761,0.0027931253,0.0025871634,0.0018482307,0.00026925778],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003694566,0.0008301631,0.87213355,0.00033094292,0.0003633671,0.0004616999,0.07600058,0.0003139333,0.0011367752,0.0018227344,0.0008119511,0.045424744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026642796,0.0004086647,0.8930253,0.00031422195,0.00023642949,0.00027595207,0.098923095,0.00087717373,0.000520035,0.0032314803,0.0021007718,0.000060297996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014446467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015521358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014446467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017675759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027997112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02872473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415265742","doi":"10.1108/jkm-03-2025-0280","title":"Examining the interdependent role of digitalization and external search breadth in driving service innovation in SMEs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Technology Adoption and User Behaviour","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Service innovation; Generalizability theory; Service (business); Interdependence; Survey data collection; Innovation management; Dual (grammatical number); Limiting","score_opus":0.07160244969716438,"score_gpt":0.37759824638950934,"score_spread":0.30599579669234495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415265742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99427384,0.00028137295,0.00036097164,0.00018807151,0.000003983084,0.000033819295,0.000080710015,0.000005269839,0.0047719744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992173,0.00014560515,0.0002419883,0.000027972188,0.0000031492457,0.000011255856,0.000049654074,0.000001561832,0.00030155535],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862146,0.00027933033,0.000118968455,0.00015638735,0.00043862135,0.0003852035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838606,0.008805721,0.0029487635,0.00056891836,0.002018122,0.0017978468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002643279,0.00030071553,0.0003855985,0.002293217,0.0011192018,0.0026538204,0.00042481435,0.00049646996,0.0035778128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016405355,0.00013466724,0.00071781396,0.0026766313,0.0014214469,0.0017302288,0.0024694179,0.00061257416,0.0002296133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017455702,0.00017477156,0.94535923,0.00044859096,0.00010546001,0.0003640989,0.010728486,0.0009901002,0.00136486,0.0027357207,0.00021556497,0.037338473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009081949,0.00011639838,0.9803262,0.00021500788,0.00009030205,0.000098676144,0.014605791,0.0013626355,0.0006659094,0.00085011806,0.00163854,0.00002129309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15899786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19638847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15899786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041688327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009580981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31614476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416457827","doi":"10.1108/jkm-05-2025-0745","title":"Knowledge self-enhancement and knowledge self-presentation in the workplace: conceptual foundations, measures, and impacts","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Knowledge Management and Sharing","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Personal knowledge management; Personality; Cognition; Self-knowledge; Knowledge engineering; Knowledge value chain; Procedural knowledge; Domain knowledge","score_opus":0.03163710122533933,"score_gpt":0.3480773911757011,"score_spread":0.3164402899503618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416457827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97658885,0.0011529562,0.0059627374,0.0007992374,0.000018843286,0.00010991354,0.000026880069,0.000019465813,0.015321084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778724,0.00014623418,0.0017672946,0.00003666948,0.000007139746,0.000028542374,0.000009411307,0.000001804842,0.00021558882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99673057,0.00166152,0.00022586166,0.0003200372,0.0008532242,0.00020877436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682532,0.017110929,0.008037501,0.0023523234,0.0023798426,0.001866248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055667143,0.000264414,0.00025393235,0.001954928,0.0007621614,0.0033417076,0.000588749,0.00058254733,0.0013846562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014298281,0.0002188977,0.00035794682,0.0012180049,0.0049843127,0.002385174,0.0028310474,0.0010399579,0.00010067895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024421228,0.001943042,0.72038865,0.0006878477,0.00018382576,0.00035802028,0.038697418,0.0008867629,0.0034208943,0.04009444,0.000310828,0.19278415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043112304,0.0007758835,0.91285133,0.00073974236,0.00017181884,0.00065653614,0.03677752,0.0052702418,0.0040107574,0.03251223,0.006099515,0.00009132186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011221557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010812016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0055667143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016783958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002060146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029439986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7115562573","doi":"10.1108/jkm-07-2025-0993","title":"Effects of knowledge management and financial attraction on new technology-based firm performance","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Private Equity and Venture Capital","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Venture capital; Debt; Attraction; Social capital; Debt financing; Competitive advantage; Capital (architecture)","score_opus":0.00838577917685959,"score_gpt":0.22995731990683957,"score_spread":0.22157154072997998,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7115562573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9946102,0.00009957669,0.00016428118,0.00017468473,0.0000045564166,0.00001694712,0.00011205792,0.0000053485646,0.0048124325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994461,0.00003179134,0.00005208007,0.00001153996,0.0000062170825,0.0000073627602,0.000067912,7.4374645e-7,0.0003762263],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820364,0.0006221512,0.00014172943,0.00019455541,0.00042532152,0.0004125795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96581984,0.013324639,0.01298509,0.00089735945,0.0015937127,0.0053793294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002366284,0.00021534307,0.00030045933,0.0015929663,0.00085416617,0.0034430777,0.0004591137,0.0005368963,0.005473548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015725983,0.00008745228,0.0002694915,0.0016395396,0.0009978861,0.0017381023,0.0025489877,0.00078061846,0.0005303414],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001048886,0.0005419525,0.97495157,0.000046559348,0.00006783816,0.00011725465,0.0005878753,0.0010705882,0.00014092594,0.0007601521,0.0003080364,0.021302346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004862145,0.00019519404,0.9952857,0.000039381855,0.000015715643,0.000036314537,0.0017630141,0.0011911661,0.0001244139,0.0005925704,0.0007395741,0.000012174093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004901911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006364647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005473548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013920107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015937058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018310845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116705671","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2025-0797","title":"Tune up! Knowledge integration in a fast-growing organization","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Information Systems Theories and Implementation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporality; Grounded theory; Data collection; Body of knowledge; Hospitality; Period (music); Focus group","score_opus":0.015507307240987705,"score_gpt":0.3407546016154748,"score_spread":0.3252472943744871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116705671","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9604463,0.00050055305,0.002239342,0.0035904965,0.000032062304,0.00015532682,0.00007043964,0.00007543281,0.032890014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99273455,0.0002752199,0.0034583183,0.00026160356,0.00000774259,0.000029065397,0.000076437536,0.000010282044,0.0031467045],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476576,0.0009597248,0.00016293155,0.00050566345,0.0016617607,0.0019441794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869982,0.0029111016,0.0018127894,0.00075178314,0.0032034763,0.004322625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005680709,0.00035564826,0.0002934979,0.0030606263,0.015213911,0.011459805,0.0017610556,0.0010815818,0.0027400649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010290316,0.00028103235,0.00033174924,0.0034832272,0.0064836326,0.005318967,0.008674481,0.001755994,0.00043137316],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024464985,0.00073827675,0.25004277,0.0005194703,0.000091180664,0.0054079024,0.36697608,0.0023493734,0.0047366815,0.040200803,0.0075056446,0.32118723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031570904,0.00038751506,0.23928145,0.00040741125,0.00005446698,0.0009786611,0.65603435,0.0034439017,0.0013850727,0.012199367,0.08568242,0.00011380401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5219371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62637556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5219371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03270334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07336634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9617567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117310848","doi":"10.1108/jkm-10-2024-1152","title":"The case of the shapeshifting iron ingot: translating knowledge through product design","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Knowledge Management","topic":"Cultural and Communication Design Research","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Hamilton Health Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Design knowledge; Product design; New product development; Product (mathematics); Domain knowledge; Strategic design; Knowledge engineering","score_opus":0.10725126789385983,"score_gpt":0.33095358170218475,"score_spread":0.22370231380832492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117310848","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6899685,0.0015081827,0.11173666,0.011659367,0.00033631266,0.00094350136,0.00019922615,0.00031218992,0.18333599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8744732,0.00062933605,0.090898365,0.0008889096,0.00003044337,0.00024976576,0.00008295349,0.00018955115,0.032557577],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925073,0.005417918,0.00020347179,0.00047210557,0.00099305,0.00040622376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98912317,0.007229708,0.0005368488,0.002005872,0.0007445249,0.00035996814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010480226,0.00054375624,0.0003183499,0.0015379991,0.006892666,0.006347256,0.0017080928,0.0029940868,0.006169363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012049152,0.00047011246,0.00064525154,0.0011553251,0.010260125,0.0053438237,0.0036873324,0.0020461464,0.001206434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006155799,0.00080591993,0.010047222,0.0012969722,0.00006317831,0.016922008,0.6048789,0.0037489343,0.01487536,0.16423376,0.010037726,0.17247449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012892431,0.0010207738,0.0073875715,0.0014367296,0.00011480093,0.006892222,0.3315463,0.007095972,0.021179358,0.04960837,0.5734431,0.00014586987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032504962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070129377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010480226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037116003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033133184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055425406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}