{"meta":{"query_hash":"5a69ba7db463","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Language and Politics"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5a69ba7db463","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Language+and+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1967011589","doi":"10.1075/jlp.8.1.08gad","title":"Post-colonial identity in Greenland?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Essentialism; Conceptualization; Identity (music); Colonialism; Politics; Sociology; Independence (probability theory); Gender studies; Anthropology; Genealogy; Ethnology; Linguistics; Political science; Aesthetics; History; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.014432437376563665,"score_gpt":0.3522792731095509,"score_spread":0.3378468357329872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967011589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77883554,0.003416175,0.0004000107,0.019499768,0.0002653879,0.000010009256,0.000031438514,0.000008292197,0.19753344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99277335,0.0005342433,0.00007374907,0.00058551895,0.000013126839,0.0000025831766,0.000008403508,0.0000038496455,0.0060052555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989215,0.00035782575,0.000021370673,0.00011506596,0.00009527538,0.00048898533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995413,0.0000982089,0.00008244449,0.000037391175,0.000052487736,0.00018816435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011913611,0.00016457778,0.0002139716,0.00074337696,0.009678329,0.0054948013,0.00040082232,0.00091095007,0.0025108806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009895901,0.000102366794,0.00012594217,0.0011862381,0.012603129,0.0037479606,0.004485933,0.0014367405,0.00020014663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040347826,0.000031472584,0.0072781956,0.000036774272,0.000005353868,0.0011596831,0.43673572,0.00005120523,0.00029135388,0.5379842,0.002727757,0.013657952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014602073,0.00003591159,0.025253322,0.00027871312,0.000010834711,0.0005432434,0.6332916,0.0001444372,0.00035984872,0.04886829,0.291176,0.000023146455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.112031914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14699541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112031914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008455652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053365114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2227596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999362386","doi":"10.1075/jlp.9.2.05pan","title":"Governing ‘others’","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguarding; Power (physics); Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Liberalism; Intervention (counseling); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Gender studies; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013910138818214214,"score_gpt":0.32146120076870616,"score_spread":0.3075510619504919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999362386","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022609156,0.0016925128,0.036627427,0.045860928,0.0013489785,0.00013105012,0.000038390244,0.00015823501,0.8915333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8474158,0.0011265833,0.0059458246,0.021340432,0.0010935185,0.0002600184,0.000077419296,0.00022573107,0.12251465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794263,0.008990926,0.0007217825,0.0044704247,0.0032697564,0.0031208151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99007213,0.0040424606,0.0012024018,0.0020333692,0.0015755905,0.0010739246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01855911,0.0006343304,0.00047094404,0.0012218795,0.009384688,0.0108725745,0.0018881273,0.0048897816,0.009543431],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015122673,0.00037650866,0.0007490523,0.0007971366,0.044576187,0.009035424,0.0102845,0.006766306,0.002411636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031862535,0.0000072711205,0.00021928664,0.000018657218,0.0000043955365,0.000052262974,0.012872077,0.00007190334,0.00015803786,0.97956663,0.0029893287,0.004036959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010199355,0.00002260921,0.00030032586,0.00016197488,0.000016383738,0.00012246669,0.007411395,0.00027637594,0.0006769368,0.45521957,0.53575325,0.000028552742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064600576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053535267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01855911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054827756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006600037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09815115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016356043","doi":"10.1075/jlp.12.3.02ivk","title":"Pragmatics meets ideology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Serbian; Linguistics; Ideology; Orthographic projection; Computer science; Alphabet; Bosnian; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Orthography; Politics; Political science; History; Artificial intelligence; Reading (process); Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013849829583990388,"score_gpt":0.23214692186336627,"score_spread":0.21829709227937588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016356043","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020193491,0.005906793,0.03119828,0.06483267,0.001085264,0.000059135225,0.00016187306,0.000117379546,0.87644523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466199,0.0021122566,0.008114315,0.0058777183,0.0014368407,0.00013580614,0.00010749371,0.00015584349,0.035439722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898454,0.0061288895,0.00031353795,0.0015702335,0.0012912354,0.0008507197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995008,0.002834081,0.00040110823,0.00084284024,0.00051683304,0.00039713448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006023093,0.0006637116,0.0007967193,0.0016995732,0.007919608,0.01101609,0.00086935295,0.0048486344,0.012215575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066729314,0.00044502452,0.000562767,0.0011363963,0.04433288,0.015606172,0.006354122,0.004636293,0.0018262542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004489166,0.0000031287823,0.00007939726,0.000020133151,0.000001982541,0.00004588776,0.0028724126,0.00002593247,0.000051786083,0.9941702,0.0011005838,0.001624107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011071079,0.0000101268715,0.00018865067,0.00005207374,0.0000034216237,0.00011685415,0.0027367014,0.00012169324,0.00008938685,0.9023592,0.09430362,0.0000073163224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029247818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018930879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012215575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047611636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035038784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040865183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031147083","doi":"10.1075/jlp.13.1.10kow","title":"Erreygers & Jacobs, (eds.), 2005. Language, Communication and the Economy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013888517911861223,"score_gpt":0.23903476051088632,"score_spread":0.2251462425990251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031147083","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009892101,0.9645546,0.0018613366,0.006733804,0.001560503,0.000010073505,0.00041641318,0.00010864455,0.023765393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00703771,0.9652042,0.0024155786,0.0004210241,0.0009132866,0.000018666064,0.0003284737,0.000042775067,0.023618337],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99965584,0.000066773115,0.000036801168,0.0000611476,0.00014651909,0.00003288721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989016,0.0006100397,0.00012259636,0.00004282183,0.00019716383,0.00012568859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001175887,0.0024747765,0.0017975767,0.0031738896,0.0010520042,0.0053342995,0.00119749,0.002172178,0.026436955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014621455,0.0014416807,0.0005188779,0.0055361805,0.0013701479,0.0067206686,0.001143754,0.002761617,0.021787575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010980772,0.00007098758,0.001463022,0.0023176954,0.00006132786,0.00018690932,0.0019322068,0.0007787815,0.00040622448,0.022267964,0.34648874,0.62391627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010605448,0.00002414886,0.00274591,0.0029677683,0.00007630434,0.00049960404,0.0017711208,0.000389143,0.00046727588,0.012156941,0.97885954,0.000031632804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015436505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033145454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026436955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020073566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037764753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08844042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033962552","doi":"10.1075/jlp.1.2.07le","title":"The concept of Europe in Le Monde’s editorials","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; European union; Elite; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Identity (music); Sociology; Resizing; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014649716893584196,"score_gpt":0.30719810787377777,"score_spread":0.2925483909801936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033962552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10370896,0.10375455,0.0049696746,0.3373624,0.047417905,0.00004335061,0.00016946638,0.000122016885,0.4024516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.934938,0.008970355,0.0015431455,0.013538956,0.014466122,0.000037737023,0.000046227724,0.00009557648,0.026363956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925316,0.004696101,0.00025391142,0.00058838807,0.0012789929,0.00065102574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885189,0.008142807,0.000998199,0.00031842466,0.0012460995,0.0007755787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007000507,0.00036818194,0.000398188,0.0027868766,0.0070367497,0.015651744,0.00059740484,0.0029459328,0.0020912196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01957104,0.00017083286,0.00027857517,0.0020678036,0.0102712875,0.004987544,0.0022857122,0.0026803864,0.00022922285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000975918,0.000025121006,0.0012618416,0.0003284907,0.00001557517,0.0007327816,0.12602475,0.00018580421,0.00047732936,0.7088921,0.13330638,0.028652262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049848973,0.0000116789315,0.00092893053,0.00034476648,0.0000038336916,0.00023912144,0.015972026,0.00007465971,0.00016098087,0.010044838,0.97220236,0.000011854095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004102097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004761308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015651744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005912986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026333816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042901933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052721092","doi":"10.1075/jlp.7.1.06sik","title":"Ballistic missile defense and articulation theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Articulation (sociology); Hegemony; Terrorism; Missile; Unilateralism; Missile defense; Ballistic missile; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Engineering; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.03149874364386655,"score_gpt":0.3372270575892342,"score_spread":0.30572831394536765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052721092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056488905,0.003995641,0.12448036,0.016045915,0.00082057156,0.00007225614,0.000062193714,0.00008581456,0.79794836],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9793088,0.0006862966,0.0058869123,0.0007172415,0.00025170317,0.00007072724,0.000043220472,0.000043639706,0.012991505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909683,0.0059223264,0.00023947844,0.0006335839,0.001409075,0.00082730013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458814,0.0033070277,0.0006821275,0.0004896285,0.0005902939,0.00034279237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066751125,0.0006423888,0.00051414,0.0032770871,0.0072736256,0.008327651,0.0017865365,0.0028686887,0.006798391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008062404,0.00031886416,0.00078304246,0.0021347,0.038414568,0.008342821,0.0061786026,0.003697702,0.0010842403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042667903,0.0000025475058,0.00008515444,0.000012634151,8.8737056e-7,0.000017183002,0.0028055806,0.00010271899,0.000020747857,0.9956267,0.00022594223,0.0010956614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015033826,0.00001934266,0.0002927611,0.00017933013,0.000007090797,0.000111296904,0.009023759,0.0012776894,0.00021797401,0.9365431,0.052297443,0.000015238859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036808937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019830056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008327651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006446612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002853777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046773672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076475960","doi":"10.1075/jlp.13.2.07jak","title":"Denotational boundary disputes in political discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Field (mathematics); Focus (optics); Politics; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01843458698000942,"score_gpt":0.2889060372825641,"score_spread":0.27047145030255465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076475960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69698465,0.008116953,0.09449155,0.011569444,0.0004107092,0.00016702083,0.00024927504,0.00019481346,0.18781556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99368274,0.00040633653,0.0045269183,0.00014260231,0.00006116975,0.000050920957,0.00007228071,0.000043842596,0.0010132324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709679,0.02087395,0.0017388001,0.0019841422,0.003320969,0.0011143251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96541214,0.026699461,0.003181506,0.0023534445,0.0018505353,0.00050278637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018080825,0.00059100694,0.0009981951,0.0075778584,0.0099947555,0.017082196,0.0017976628,0.004648396,0.004536457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042965863,0.0008240984,0.0005569453,0.007026975,0.03841654,0.03439351,0.010214631,0.004302169,0.00051888655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007178064,0.000016812464,0.0010070885,0.00012102978,0.000007955298,0.00028421788,0.19998446,0.00014440404,0.0010057657,0.7900452,0.0004803407,0.0068309214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055249468,0.00005121801,0.0024019585,0.00046998204,0.000024889187,0.00074367697,0.2326621,0.0019822263,0.0017538505,0.70837283,0.05141408,0.000067837624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019320217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013490809,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018080825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070807687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018839928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095621705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108330218","doi":"10.1075/jlp.4.1.02gra","title":"The language of neofeudal corporatism and the war on Iraq","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Geopolitics; Postmodernism; Politics; Globalization; Capitalism; Vocabulary; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Economic history; Linguistics; Law; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010251594807392966,"score_gpt":0.31329056378772896,"score_spread":0.303038968980336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108330218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61769223,0.007998609,0.004579946,0.043442976,0.00042515772,0.00004504262,0.00019032063,0.00006497206,0.32556075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953589,0.0008639274,0.00036119172,0.00072385784,0.00012475572,0.000021158181,0.000024772751,0.0000246311,0.0024968546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973888,0.0018368287,0.00006604746,0.00014136705,0.0002792019,0.00028789305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965719,0.002414623,0.00044922004,0.000151058,0.00033747105,0.00007574738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030049956,0.00036761284,0.0002810763,0.001471343,0.008244991,0.005131445,0.0007041794,0.0011759845,0.0022801198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00598384,0.0003183775,0.000130939,0.0024751024,0.024796102,0.004205096,0.0023017095,0.0024560753,0.00031068188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049043803,0.000021520342,0.0017575677,0.0001037231,0.0000064999595,0.0007096676,0.42131615,0.00023644455,0.0006095358,0.5574771,0.0064050513,0.011307659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003968802,0.00006426318,0.013600552,0.0008058433,0.00001536098,0.0010763797,0.46449682,0.0012303925,0.0010344692,0.098299295,0.41926926,0.00006767714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015003017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011933275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015003017,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006531259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024335706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04738778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171041893","doi":"10.1075/jlp.10.3.07pel","title":"Language, rights and the language of language rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Language policy; Sociolinguistics; Sociology; Politics; Linguistics; Sociology of language; Epistemology; Political science; Comprehension approach; Language education; Law; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.033950228283999774,"score_gpt":0.396845115637292,"score_spread":0.36289488735329223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171041893","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036260046,0.016273966,0.048188854,0.11315984,0.00081723265,0.000040288967,0.00011887184,0.00009011284,0.7850509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630264,0.0044165463,0.0051804725,0.004727047,0.00085518364,0.00009724879,0.000057787936,0.00006907583,0.021570172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98957235,0.0072906036,0.00032780675,0.00080467755,0.0010764127,0.00092808675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879268,0.009196022,0.0008767386,0.00082978257,0.0006478409,0.0005228609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009181158,0.0004149339,0.0005793113,0.0017766858,0.006352638,0.01460223,0.001306908,0.0047892085,0.0061950153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015443219,0.00027912043,0.00037806982,0.0019453514,0.05631175,0.016803363,0.006120019,0.0051115025,0.00069102104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002200816,0.0000013883033,0.000036223726,0.0000066990665,6.6373786e-7,0.000012237972,0.0010224,0.00003875088,0.000015268855,0.9977191,0.00032051964,0.00082451187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056550152,0.0000060626835,0.00013498832,0.00008283746,0.0000021718477,0.000042500036,0.0016027489,0.00015760545,0.0000647155,0.9584998,0.039394833,0.0000061049213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052033914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037994373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01460223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005263016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054371115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048555195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481855666","doi":"10.1075/jlp.15.3.03rod","title":"The politics of office design","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Open plan; Politics; Framing (construction); Ideology; Semiotics; Sociology; Work (physics); Chronotope; Deregulation; Neoliberalism (international relations); Public relations; Political science; Political economy; Engineering; Management; Law; Art; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04311296411292006,"score_gpt":0.30854887235989836,"score_spread":0.2654359082469783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481855666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03629415,0.0043514078,0.0141167175,0.03647902,0.00045489945,0.000025677735,0.000033441127,0.000068710826,0.9081759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9612341,0.00092806615,0.0015608759,0.001789774,0.00028459457,0.000054197597,0.000014564579,0.00008357974,0.03405021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780146,0.01558293,0.00037536953,0.0014082615,0.0027629803,0.0018558195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914989,0.0053526354,0.00062970835,0.0010997369,0.00074521924,0.00067381095],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012612562,0.0003873932,0.00044790405,0.0015740651,0.012089122,0.020558963,0.0009767872,0.003759596,0.008804823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01074342,0.00044625878,0.00037111042,0.0018596186,0.05653005,0.0066907974,0.0068356083,0.004501131,0.0012520988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010303756,0.0000059542126,0.00013006717,0.000010951243,0.0000013044491,0.00003034308,0.0055531748,0.00010781177,0.000044753207,0.9878,0.0021181551,0.0041870777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027060003,0.000034950917,0.0006432011,0.00023256388,0.0000073899096,0.00012514985,0.015329001,0.00064698653,0.00036233242,0.5130437,0.46952596,0.000021757303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042860825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038562242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020558963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010684566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041473643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07752228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494353997","doi":"10.1075/jlp.15.1.01ves","title":"Language ideologies in social media","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Social media; Linguistics; Language ideology; Complaint; Media studies; Sociology; Backlash; Negativity effect; Political science; Psychology; Law; Politics; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02634152782432109,"score_gpt":0.297312218848513,"score_spread":0.2709706910241919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494353997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86460483,0.001971464,0.002736149,0.00466629,0.00017042075,0.00006258634,0.00023385817,0.000036510748,0.12551783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699545,0.00033145247,0.00035633033,0.00017876341,0.00004805675,0.000039544582,0.00005569717,0.000025345922,0.00196933],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907273,0.0065685343,0.00022976559,0.00057587493,0.0011354265,0.0007631592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880342,0.008877648,0.0011875379,0.00047630872,0.0010155361,0.00040881595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075154766,0.00046143492,0.000348168,0.009706615,0.011276277,0.017369349,0.0009063687,0.001627935,0.0035505146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011278078,0.00029766516,0.00027391774,0.0040669804,0.018134126,0.0104539115,0.0060938615,0.0017049903,0.0003653327],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006544426,0.000035057394,0.0071688443,0.000083580526,0.000015262905,0.000508371,0.9049303,0.00008812882,0.0008342492,0.07403095,0.0010347837,0.011204926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012360757,0.000021328427,0.00776096,0.00026170103,0.000011363071,0.00018995993,0.93076617,0.00038546705,0.00057872577,0.0117762685,0.048211362,0.000024395442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0107939625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012167665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017369349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007147132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021768722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05185634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754281940","doi":"10.1075/jlp.17008.sma","title":"Online negativity in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Negativity effect; Tone (literature); Adversary; Empirical evidence; Political science; Personality; Empirical research; Public relations; Social psychology; Advertising; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Linguistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.026088845274672492,"score_gpt":0.3497679817756057,"score_spread":0.3236791365009332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754281940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9215414,0.00068780023,0.00026243328,0.0048123393,0.00009535946,0.000043910823,0.0018889612,0.000028308135,0.07063948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933501,0.00032409476,0.00007623602,0.00030189942,0.000019536785,0.000011087871,0.00028263868,0.000012912152,0.0056214454],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969716,0.00032826234,0.0000661412,0.00032444077,0.0013636233,0.000945846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909174,0.0018708793,0.00145607,0.00034160062,0.003525419,0.0018888068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017824449,0.00029582734,0.00044277296,0.003145773,0.011553443,0.0053057563,0.00097095466,0.0007457194,0.007894397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008208272,0.00020936383,0.00022711956,0.005808204,0.0041914647,0.0010832992,0.0025620467,0.0012806875,0.0004649637],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004939362,0.000113815535,0.6061688,0.00037739123,0.00007259831,0.0019267187,0.25566283,0.00057890604,0.0047298255,0.027297474,0.03454441,0.06803326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015004836,0.00005563066,0.67630726,0.0001700158,0.000045066587,0.00032253115,0.18363513,0.0010347301,0.0013089662,0.001668261,0.13527389,0.00016349075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9795101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98452777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0439263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0439263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038897354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31870908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916387451","doi":"10.1075/jlp.14013.luk","title":"Varieties and effects of emotional content in public deliberation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Emotive; Framing (construction); Argumentative; Ballot; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Argumentation theory; CLARITY; Process (computing); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Voting; Linguistics; Law; Engineering; History; Politics","score_opus":0.0125351522132924,"score_gpt":0.2059699510732384,"score_spread":0.193434798859946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916387451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.938902,0.00011088043,0.005601747,0.0013062528,0.000052454583,0.00006869624,0.000034933688,0.00006982851,0.05385313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99888116,0.000022217462,0.00061303825,0.00005769788,0.000013554116,0.000032832555,0.000012791797,0.000021249236,0.00034547556],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744382,0.020337233,0.0005003679,0.0009711108,0.002692205,0.0010610083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8839149,0.09921937,0.0075563784,0.003907734,0.0038628157,0.0015387912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011623831,0.00042363835,0.0003586756,0.0019674909,0.002826114,0.008449865,0.0009116108,0.0017379376,0.003669403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08811105,0.00045582574,0.00039554219,0.001070852,0.009093313,0.0051144985,0.0066107195,0.002467456,0.00028719698],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024320986,0.00068917545,0.08736712,0.00079555047,0.0001810509,0.0020412728,0.6122944,0.0042798384,0.022456817,0.18710068,0.0015324197,0.07882965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031901302,0.0012999784,0.25704023,0.00078115985,0.00035003212,0.0013731228,0.4760946,0.01674138,0.015326666,0.19677359,0.033549964,0.00035028657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000527834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041556807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011623831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00243403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066881103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06147343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035890857","doi":"10.1075/jlp.18030.ves","title":"Language ideological debates about linguistic landscapes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Signage; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Ethnic group; Linguistic landscape; Status quo; Sociology; Nationalism; Language ideology; Political science; Media studies; History; Law; Politics; Advertising; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04384175651882448,"score_gpt":0.4233923232069269,"score_spread":0.3795505666881024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035890857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3858402,0.0025328472,0.0032148394,0.051549327,0.00035677134,0.000035593515,0.00010575308,0.000048638274,0.5563159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545634,0.00021824696,0.00021601123,0.0008743568,0.000029108362,0.000008195144,0.000011268356,0.000014211022,0.003172307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916072,0.0042361896,0.0001242477,0.0007106441,0.0014799756,0.0018417786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929004,0.0039426163,0.00046131387,0.00034928793,0.0015709484,0.00077562453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01068764,0.0004509008,0.000441449,0.0034731338,0.03616456,0.021990528,0.001592452,0.002472008,0.003632704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008215357,0.00026464832,0.000294276,0.0022712692,0.07457328,0.0048463685,0.006640563,0.0044186255,0.00019462728],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003102451,0.00001190633,0.0015398578,0.00003891364,0.000005617376,0.0003464647,0.460729,0.00014111561,0.00046500014,0.52729756,0.0035224594,0.005871026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012457372,0.000011715594,0.0037109482,0.00030839074,0.000016254202,0.00010193844,0.79754007,0.0002699829,0.0005364517,0.0680898,0.1293632,0.000038714243],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.598794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6103505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.598794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060708605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034531288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8071376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382680232","doi":"10.1075/jlp.22125.vau","title":"ICT environmentalism and the sustainability game","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Conceptualization; Rhetoric; Information and Communications Technology; Rhetorical question; Politics; Public relations; Environmentalism; Political science; Sociology; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.142401090833312,"score_gpt":0.4302776146673712,"score_spread":0.28787652383405915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382680232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16034788,0.0017161603,0.020624243,0.037484884,0.000289107,0.00003931411,0.000042068812,0.00006224759,0.7793941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99296737,0.00026920612,0.0005531385,0.000687014,0.0000526084,0.000018333045,0.000007685369,0.000016473492,0.0054282174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960517,0.003023035,0.000065049244,0.0001825411,0.00041083308,0.0002668248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99459463,0.0043058116,0.00036469923,0.000222188,0.0002883757,0.00022433633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035607,0.00030471673,0.00018587433,0.0013341245,0.0032956146,0.008106411,0.00059636147,0.0022514863,0.0045074043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005032039,0.00015126505,0.00024839843,0.0011282342,0.027804002,0.0072462317,0.005094704,0.0022446956,0.00032622268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011132672,0.000013071948,0.0003200942,0.00003081146,0.0000023426344,0.00011918757,0.013413995,0.00040224963,0.00022497805,0.98206675,0.0008284038,0.0025668812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018675577,0.00003762919,0.0008285902,0.00026864928,0.000007975917,0.00021324834,0.043103054,0.0036427684,0.0009714683,0.804038,0.14684922,0.000020670737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015059542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012234056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008106411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004059671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017618245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029455125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383102274","doi":"10.1075/jlp.22126.mor","title":"“Hope dies – Action begins”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Vision; Action (physics); Nationalism; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Determinism; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.438425182919484,"score_gpt":0.5074250939270203,"score_spread":0.06899991100753627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383102274","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14141028,0.0037980282,0.037109435,0.17961326,0.00473801,0.0001781028,0.00016457857,0.00046952552,0.63251877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96833897,0.00039912734,0.0013876205,0.00609086,0.00022246414,0.000050406736,0.000030736563,0.00011691852,0.023362858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895001,0.007738255,0.000197003,0.0007556223,0.0008977803,0.0009112723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99209255,0.0046108603,0.00066906266,0.0006816448,0.0010583302,0.00088746694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007996262,0.0007120907,0.0003954074,0.0008102932,0.008738248,0.007835511,0.0011679934,0.0044268398,0.0070177447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013170786,0.0002950373,0.00048840686,0.00044920048,0.045116413,0.00877248,0.006934201,0.007746662,0.0012443223],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046851143,0.000014466354,0.00046306793,0.00011300525,0.0000088815095,0.00040501592,0.4338291,0.000101563746,0.00077480014,0.54456204,0.0137661155,0.0059150467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014111416,0.00007461124,0.00087724876,0.00048277658,0.000011955547,0.00040462674,0.37805966,0.00044119588,0.000893486,0.12149896,0.49718165,0.00005978789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057247668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053580864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008738248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005568752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028600474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04228878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406143571","doi":"10.1075/jlp.24126.mcc","title":"From social awareness to authoritarian other","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Moral panic; Authoritarianism; Framing (construction); Democracy; Ideology; Politics; Legitimacy; Sociology; Critical discourse analysis; Political science; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.020322577248837473,"score_gpt":0.37674232172162286,"score_spread":0.3564197444727854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406143571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57168126,0.00090533315,0.008923179,0.020824837,0.0003187031,0.00008857419,0.00014307622,0.00014491637,0.39697018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952584,0.0000956936,0.00033322335,0.00035417223,0.000020125379,0.00000799738,0.00001576329,0.000031788706,0.0038828442],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888093,0.0034003058,0.00023949445,0.0012688613,0.003959118,0.0023229916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98920447,0.004158595,0.0012978897,0.00080634275,0.0031034376,0.0014293311],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008551908,0.0006077155,0.00047161587,0.0045794556,0.023699725,0.011387779,0.0013839944,0.0016617253,0.004298439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01740132,0.00036815295,0.00031886296,0.0027273253,0.051573902,0.00607872,0.008610075,0.0062440396,0.00026306396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000504591,0.0000150012465,0.0042863926,0.000064841515,0.000008720593,0.00024884802,0.7599078,0.000120694094,0.0017869509,0.21868922,0.002014443,0.012806705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000104463425,0.000034502318,0.014068844,0.00027797825,0.000024325866,0.00018785504,0.71881735,0.0004202073,0.0024593596,0.03748672,0.22609377,0.00011856187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55565715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5410588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55565715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042447068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040705886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89391935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416647151","doi":"10.1075/jlp.24257.cat","title":"“We are workers, we are not slaves”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Embodied cognition; Negotiation; Ideology; Work (physics); Domestic work","score_opus":0.013768552187284098,"score_gpt":0.3202166545902886,"score_spread":0.30644810240300446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416647151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66748357,0.0011718716,0.011548522,0.04016657,0.00053145847,0.000051987627,0.00006696819,0.000043279164,0.27893567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914551,0.00012810402,0.00040842307,0.0008250208,0.000038661216,0.000009622251,0.000010096698,0.0000069426214,0.0071181934],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99554765,0.0032793216,0.00008508096,0.00028574603,0.0004339416,0.0003683099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969995,0.0014059495,0.00053430075,0.00031588145,0.00042153592,0.00032277833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042568846,0.00020767408,0.00019886091,0.0005654934,0.0045625805,0.0043050316,0.00051493867,0.00081674935,0.0043721064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053543677,0.00009843036,0.00010690774,0.0005335512,0.027909001,0.0036221503,0.0027244047,0.0018774424,0.0005445778],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031798885,0.000027839415,0.007991228,0.00008960418,0.000006998217,0.00033749893,0.58091766,0.00009397586,0.0007282038,0.39251974,0.006036406,0.011219044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013314146,0.000060373004,0.012319205,0.00042965988,0.0000127877865,0.00039968814,0.71762043,0.00046441457,0.00090055214,0.05297727,0.21477666,0.00002564654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006351717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062171603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006351717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023286142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016919426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022512853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}