{"meta":{"query_hash":"5a69ba7db463","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Language and Politics"},"cohort_total":18,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":18,"exported":18,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/5a69ba7db463","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Language+and+Politics"},"results":[{"id":"W1967011589","doi":"10.1075/jlp.8.1.08gad","title":"Post-colonial identity in Greenland?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Arctic and Russian Policy Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":102,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Essentialism; Conceptualization; Identity (music); Colonialism; Politics; Sociology; Independence (probability theory); Gender studies; Anthropology; Genealogy; Ethnology; Linguistics; Political science; Aesthetics; History; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.014432437376563665,"score_gpt":0.3522792731095509,"score_spread":0.3378468357329872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967011589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96682405,0.0010686865,0.000015328544,0.0170998,0.00010298136,0.000027791495,0.00000352354,0.0000033880983,0.014854418],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99637634,0.00032466787,0.00015180484,0.001407577,0.0008803793,7.254972e-8,1.2649822e-7,0.0000015931417,0.00085744966],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994155,0.00006181564,0.00016055176,0.000033314805,0.00015468853,0.00017414054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996933,0.00005788553,0.00008175643,0.000031087053,0.000047536978,0.000088474844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003381794,0.000040708608,0.000119662225,0.00007379922,0.00012813888,0.000026143305,0.00007759659,0.00004123734,0.000021519652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022254814,0.00003125861,0.000036609777,0.00007544657,0.000089282694,0.0001768125,0.0000108645345,0.0001127631,0.000002131811],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004944334,0.00014867043,0.039535623,0.000015813272,0.00004221032,0.00074240455,0.572589,0.0000011490473,0.00017434565,0.36926714,0.0035536024,0.013880615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016697814,0.0006864719,0.7745294,0.00012330753,0.00008215923,0.00016298468,0.09254883,0.000004628136,0.00008699435,0.07417875,0.05562829,0.00029840885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034098858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029475258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73499376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003426349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000083670435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.515475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999362386","doi":"10.1075/jlp.9.2.05pan","title":"Governing ‘others’","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Reproductive Health and Technologies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguarding; Power (physics); Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Liberalism; Intervention (counseling); Political science; Environmental ethics; Law and economics; Epistemology; Politics; Law; Gender studies; Psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013910138818214214,"score_gpt":0.32146120076870616,"score_spread":0.3075510619504919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999362386","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9920445,0.0011432412,0.000025177753,0.0020329335,0.00016044592,0.000027122134,0.0000016858781,0.000010092786,0.0045548216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957521,0.00008250782,0.0023567202,0.00049467303,0.000675291,1.4211382e-7,2.8325687e-7,0.0000049062523,0.0006333513],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996443,0.0000050494978,0.00012438717,0.000037839993,0.00008301809,0.000105429695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964297,0.00002957357,0.00008655734,0.0000911144,0.00006085858,0.00008894774],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014482392,0.000036341484,0.00011269296,0.000051118757,0.000023029868,0.000006307538,0.000027142654,0.000047491332,0.000039468094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042397025,0.000024433715,0.00002761598,0.000029486466,0.000048888112,0.000033339536,0.000008962352,0.00031435792,0.0000032970897],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000260477,0.00035797304,0.34872645,0.0007345411,0.00026151715,0.0027238228,0.020391418,4.884456e-7,0.38403746,0.06337348,0.012194835,0.16693753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041748863,0.0023868915,0.23824342,0.00028187217,0.00029364292,0.018935358,0.020369932,0.00002530332,0.10359676,0.0059670443,0.6054016,0.00032332708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016886741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016423307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5932067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007644631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056899924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13657463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016356043","doi":"10.1075/jlp.12.3.02ivk","title":"Pragmatics meets ideology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Serbian; Linguistics; Ideology; Orthographic projection; Computer science; Alphabet; Bosnian; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Orthography; Politics; Political science; History; Artificial intelligence; Reading (process); Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013849829583990388,"score_gpt":0.23214692186336627,"score_spread":0.21829709227937588,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016356043","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854306,0.0012067949,0.000023287233,0.00023273315,0.0037218356,0.000050406798,0.000017314724,0.000010258335,0.009306795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817452,0.00006293119,0.00038087042,0.0009509466,0.012793298,2.9913932e-7,0.0000023817447,0.000007754201,0.004056361],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993622,0.000033141336,0.0002530748,0.000049683313,0.00013116618,0.00017078941],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985711,0.00008146627,0.00018164354,0.000084270316,0.00097123743,0.00011026363],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012233331,0.000079331556,0.00018062998,0.00009499882,0.00011181048,0.00014455352,0.00011233,0.00003715689,0.001422903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015223093,0.00006113443,0.000061194805,0.000011358762,0.0001514306,0.00018689377,0.00004411705,0.00013057367,0.00006115249],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000952092,0.0001890397,0.0088954065,0.0002476091,0.00024762016,0.00034284912,0.520164,0.0000014811609,0.000057160672,0.2641645,0.20381601,0.0018647602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024903289,0.0008129567,0.005284556,0.0002131893,0.0006934191,0.00016226494,0.5201209,0.0001822382,0.000718234,0.063955136,0.40452582,0.0008409729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008446664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014162285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2007098,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015416515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026651413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2031147083","doi":"10.1075/jlp.13.1.10kow","title":"Erreygers &amp; Jacobs, (eds.), 2005. Language, Communication and the Economy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Sociology; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013888517911861223,"score_gpt":0.23903476051088632,"score_spread":0.2251462425990251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2031147083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9446194,0.015820965,0.00007162894,0.0007495179,0.0015594029,0.000096072465,0.00003606541,0.000016465312,0.03703045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98597705,0.0005714276,0.00016396279,0.0014052107,0.0067317095,4.6764595e-7,0.000009420678,0.000009230806,0.005131514],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999336,0.00011763178,0.0002343782,0.00006084371,0.00009446759,0.00015666216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894655,0.00024914465,0.00021093841,0.00018458613,0.0003165611,0.00009219864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005580924,0.00009083378,0.00019909318,0.00007265456,0.00026991335,0.00024909235,0.00017045299,0.00003323169,0.00025507808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011680323,0.000060819748,0.0000671631,0.000010269311,0.00040093734,0.00015475003,0.000070513204,0.00018774132,0.000012789478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006038538,0.0000719229,0.0018294777,0.00013193801,0.0001970221,0.000019825597,0.5601084,0.0000021985832,0.0000062302697,0.36271903,0.071964644,0.0028888755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027079345,0.00006857439,0.00040952893,0.000087611494,0.00035574468,0.000032432334,0.14893793,0.000106906904,0.000043511944,0.018796884,0.8281784,0.00027450424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011514933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010699355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7562138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014848102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001953278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2792926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2033962552","doi":"10.1075/jlp.1.2.07le","title":"The concept of Europe in Le Monde’s editorials","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"European Union Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Argumentation theory; European union; Elite; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Identity (music); Sociology; Resizing; Epistemology; Law; Politics; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014649716893584196,"score_gpt":0.30719810787377777,"score_spread":0.2925483909801936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2033962552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.814143,0.008740733,0.00002551228,0.0018178592,0.0024481171,0.000059727932,0.000013297322,0.0000035289759,0.17274824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993562,0.00086445484,0.000045238907,0.0001942654,0.0020161376,6.562753e-8,5.2621374e-8,0.0000034145403,0.0033144078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991717,0.00029827582,0.00021727853,0.000026773803,0.00016001577,0.00012598546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930304,0.00029837122,0.00020372975,0.00005201226,0.00008730635,0.000055555804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008096998,0.000032323995,0.00009106618,0.000020964733,0.00009384885,0.000021576523,0.00010409446,0.000023213943,0.0000088423485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014836878,0.00002187981,0.000025378355,0.00008237103,0.00016393373,0.00007136601,0.000007645551,0.00009750842,7.9947336e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040047266,0.00001901886,0.00050842576,0.0000025835836,0.000005912929,0.00002612484,0.025328746,0.0000025829033,0.00018679246,0.96603763,0.007531073,0.00034707642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032368256,0.000045322937,0.0014252295,0.000027746664,0.0000054731886,0.000007721371,0.010391209,2.4381424e-7,0.0025030137,0.0026398217,0.9825893,0.000041210747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006887636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000116173556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97505826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010576571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018301785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.177622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052721092","doi":"10.1075/jlp.7.1.06sik","title":"Ballistic missile defense and articulation theory","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Articulation (sociology); Hegemony; Terrorism; Missile; Unilateralism; Missile defense; Ballistic missile; Argument (complex analysis); Law; Sociology; Political science; Politics; Law and economics; Engineering; Aerospace engineering","score_opus":0.03149874364386655,"score_gpt":0.3372270575892342,"score_spread":0.30572831394536765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052721092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826126,0.006164996,0.00025065505,0.0014067667,0.00020417436,0.00003241259,0.0000037957018,0.000008253392,0.00931631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99534,0.00044127094,0.0004903138,0.0005489409,0.00054615154,1.4140818e-7,5.5140083e-7,0.000004295764,0.0026283287],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99933666,0.00017820676,0.00014651418,0.000048884387,0.00015347762,0.00013624156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993899,0.00020729643,0.00011531985,0.000043928074,0.000104734594,0.00013880851],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004162262,0.000049297327,0.00010971104,0.000037178168,0.00037953394,0.000014478366,0.000044861827,0.00009817114,0.00013270417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066525745,0.00003970189,0.000029867455,0.000034849327,0.0008449739,0.00009176317,0.00000862856,0.0001733146,0.0000028333077],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028172395,0.000058105787,0.009923759,0.000032725966,0.00004550418,0.00060147553,0.6017866,0.000004275576,0.0004554837,0.3802306,0.0059152814,0.0009180122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020858485,0.0005522194,0.047115233,0.00020872575,0.00048124962,0.002469019,0.5472704,0.00006645084,0.00052408426,0.092325054,0.3061593,0.0007424032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00028657247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010193179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.300244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039418897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011690138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31133416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076475960","doi":"10.1075/jlp.13.2.07jak","title":"Denotational boundary disputes in political discourse","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"linguistics and terminology studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"German; Field (mathematics); Focus (optics); Politics; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Social science; Political science; Law; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01843458698000942,"score_gpt":0.2889060372825641,"score_spread":0.27047145030255465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076475960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719292,0.0007702576,0.000027398219,0.0015901809,0.00040176543,0.000016775119,0.000019071018,0.0000035639898,0.025241785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99645674,0.000013101282,0.00013277239,0.00068351504,0.001997603,3.503311e-7,0.000002098335,0.000005105545,0.0007087266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994483,0.000026576186,0.000213029,0.00004401494,0.00008963335,0.00017847391],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995521,0.00018939159,0.00007019559,0.00004231926,0.00007930488,0.000066745924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012237676,0.00006104214,0.00014515367,0.0000835565,0.00008943208,0.000059289647,0.000051917264,0.000020385693,0.000062241095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002196564,0.000043997374,0.000033967535,0.000007581254,0.00030873044,0.000052455016,0.000020941427,0.00011723332,0.000002777952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000350846,0.0000347681,0.0056028287,0.000014601693,0.00001970009,0.000058768994,0.019136848,1.6827269e-7,0.0000033481092,0.9741103,0.0003301321,0.00068501895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026795398,0.0008587974,0.04764497,0.0002639137,0.00024610994,0.00041004914,0.08654888,0.00027978417,0.00014724521,0.4069461,0.4534188,0.00055582606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00010769655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018895844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5671642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013127486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031272746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17941609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2108330218","doi":"10.1075/jlp.4.1.02gra","title":"The language of neofeudal corporatism and the war on Iraq","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"International Relations and Foreign Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Corporatism; Geopolitics; Postmodernism; Politics; Globalization; Capitalism; Vocabulary; Political economy; Political science; Sociology; Economic history; Linguistics; Law; History; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010251594807392966,"score_gpt":0.31329056378772896,"score_spread":0.303038968980336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108330218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9009891,0.0031102924,0.000027138998,0.00474388,0.00006071204,0.00005127751,0.00001077873,0.0000020998295,0.09100473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99417096,0.000665864,0.00011509328,0.000531253,0.0008050913,3.1254928e-7,3.3786722e-7,0.0000026737675,0.0037084378],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999436,0.00007694707,0.00017131736,0.00002496153,0.00019537148,0.00009538283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923676,0.00042500554,0.00017099404,0.000049278544,0.00007198598,0.00004595561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053979526,0.000036256035,0.000076100114,0.000033147717,0.00022902293,0.000030064934,0.00009300378,0.000030272158,0.000023577588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024641422,0.00001805753,0.000039170416,0.000036855745,0.00032510783,0.00006315246,0.0000123267655,0.00011217772,0.0000018774639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016546908,0.000008518244,0.00017276143,0.0000014101751,0.000017077553,0.0000049506116,0.044607818,0.0000035960888,0.000015868762,0.94933116,0.00066431344,0.00515599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067362287,0.00071728794,0.01594499,0.00024244074,0.00028079757,0.00037057963,0.30907193,0.0009990393,0.0014244386,0.2693479,0.39443675,0.00042762118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005389436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017335663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67998326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001778652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005787046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17614824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2171041893","doi":"10.1075/jlp.10.3.07pel","title":"Language, rights and the language of language rights","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Language policy; Sociolinguistics; Sociology; Politics; Linguistics; Sociology of language; Epistemology; Political science; Comprehension approach; Language education; Law; Philosophy; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.033950228283999774,"score_gpt":0.396845115637292,"score_spread":0.36289488735329223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2171041893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93759465,0.004912243,0.0000069073185,0.00040029024,0.00025533442,0.000114007074,0.000021682272,0.000012665438,0.05668221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98989695,0.000110937144,0.00047817666,0.000538563,0.0011287825,0.0000011284028,0.0000021498877,0.000009160312,0.007834137],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986327,0.00029590365,0.0003977996,0.00009616743,0.00029309135,0.00028429026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987648,0.00033768872,0.00034796604,0.00018337717,0.00012518553,0.00024098533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085090584,0.00012705363,0.000300401,0.00014283988,0.00024670156,0.00004816654,0.00024185656,0.00010148424,0.00046937465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030245996,0.000077267614,0.0001030298,0.0001331559,0.0005570479,0.0001462826,0.00003570508,0.00023969803,0.0000069030552],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048485486,0.000065240056,0.0002681961,0.000029545488,0.00004979287,0.00007678071,0.9321726,7.664372e-8,0.00023427076,0.064081974,0.000652151,0.0023208864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005970943,0.00029506552,0.0052535995,0.00028512123,0.00046695798,0.00033748828,0.8916996,0.0000314288,0.017647088,0.011531234,0.06585289,0.00062857213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039113455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002614134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06520074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024114152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001425923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96728516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481855666","doi":"10.1075/jlp.15.3.03rod","title":"The politics of office design","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Temporalities; Open plan; Politics; Framing (construction); Ideology; Semiotics; Sociology; Work (physics); Chronotope; Deregulation; Neoliberalism (international relations); Public relations; Political science; Political economy; Engineering; Management; Law; Art; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04311296411292006,"score_gpt":0.30854887235989836,"score_spread":0.2654359082469783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481855666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9582789,0.005017903,0.0007259533,0.025587581,0.0005097302,0.00011109874,0.00001456986,0.000008035693,0.009746257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9461087,0.0009272507,0.00042182524,0.0001786398,0.00070339045,2.2539908e-7,9.085819e-8,0.0000037036941,0.05165618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931437,0.00008148684,0.00021017164,0.000027106127,0.00019100668,0.0001758888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905175,0.0004730033,0.00015964867,0.000047860613,0.0001660755,0.00010165748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004832206,0.000040349583,0.00008819146,0.000019564985,0.00022217246,0.000029401122,0.00011544662,0.000042194173,0.00005595063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040147756,0.000018181448,0.000034526303,0.000048151534,0.00021081654,0.00006619113,0.000015574717,0.000058066027,0.0000015256113],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007021023,0.00009533512,0.004459173,0.000028980085,0.00022789596,0.00011737603,0.10252971,0.0000020326524,0.003171947,0.42549908,0.35949752,0.10430072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003148322,0.00011395107,0.0012453377,0.000082351486,0.000030941115,0.000031576034,0.03483527,6.6494533e-7,0.0036203137,0.0031975477,0.9564455,0.00008168434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030307597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000048983544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.596948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042579646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020967296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17087933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494353997","doi":"10.1075/jlp.15.1.01ves","title":"Language ideologies in social media","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Social media; Linguistics; Language ideology; Complaint; Media studies; Sociology; Backlash; Negativity effect; Political science; Psychology; Law; Politics; Social psychology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02634152782432109,"score_gpt":0.297312218848513,"score_spread":0.2709706910241919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494353997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9682814,0.0043042894,0.000011063517,0.001574007,0.0002589067,0.000021698761,0.000035717854,0.000011388623,0.025501529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99454,0.000150815,0.00006320441,0.0002448114,0.0026530281,7.1429446e-7,9.488206e-7,0.000009311812,0.002337214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991784,0.00005166363,0.0003146403,0.00006848886,0.00017250987,0.00021425984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993344,0.0003022741,0.00016843493,0.00007278438,0.00007823956,0.00004386343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023657018,0.00010004904,0.00027269512,0.00019570038,0.00008526801,0.00005015001,0.00012168591,0.0000328922,0.0007028716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032808198,0.000055765642,0.00008860556,0.000028294631,0.00032149692,0.00019515106,0.000046962356,0.000101719765,0.000009903566],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001954361,0.00006805027,0.0013857487,0.000030112094,0.00015976989,0.00073107815,0.69254774,2.1722933e-7,0.00048648348,0.27397195,0.007189025,0.023410285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002172025,0.000173026,0.005287382,0.00028731296,0.0002888983,0.00010738225,0.92639714,0.0000019642575,0.0012329953,0.015656527,0.04792929,0.000466077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000076067634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008106102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25831544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026563708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024532817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7695951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754281940","doi":"10.1075/jlp.17008.sma","title":"Online negativity in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Negativity effect; Tone (literature); Adversary; Empirical evidence; Political science; Personality; Empirical research; Public relations; Social psychology; Advertising; Psychology; Business; Computer science; Linguistics; Computer security","score_opus":0.026088845274672492,"score_gpt":0.3497679817756057,"score_spread":0.3236791365009332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754281940","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9917064,0.00028595465,0.0000012433496,0.0034296243,0.00050122646,0.000021502115,0.000017961009,0.0000011284106,0.004034969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977179,0.00014764136,0.000089809284,0.00043908186,0.0013093894,1.01772955e-7,3.4325862e-7,0.0000028320835,0.00029290732],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937505,0.00006595295,0.00014637384,0.0000291881,0.0001882313,0.0001951996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993502,0.00018460963,0.00016901821,0.00007458958,0.000057537174,0.00016403814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016132974,0.00003882979,0.00012661901,0.000027386466,0.00021406938,0.000045548608,0.00015156825,0.000034807566,0.000025066953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010625221,0.000034416964,0.000021315782,0.0000198202,0.0001196115,0.0001111148,0.000016844913,0.00014655077,3.3201928e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076179226,0.00008205365,0.8184836,0.000027379421,0.000026469803,0.0008948668,0.12741975,9.2726714e-7,0.000068543995,0.03478074,0.0021425006,0.01606554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012419337,0.000081599006,0.5017951,0.0001572441,0.0000541909,0.00003756972,0.348961,0.000018022176,0.00056464365,0.010654472,0.13615148,0.00028272727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.964919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9780481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31668848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017277834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016593982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2943701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2916387451","doi":"10.1075/jlp.14013.luk","title":"Varieties and effects of emotional content in public deliberation","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Emotive; Framing (construction); Argumentative; Ballot; Narrative; Context (archaeology); Social psychology; Psychology; Argumentation theory; CLARITY; Process (computing); Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Voting; Linguistics; Law; Engineering; History; Politics","score_opus":0.0125351522132924,"score_gpt":0.2059699510732384,"score_spread":0.193434798859946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2916387451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99526894,0.0012063307,0.00012008857,0.00073045935,0.00011830805,0.00005698038,4.3570876e-7,0.0000024380429,0.0024960202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984224,0.00007459786,0.00009724189,0.0007527583,0.0002699032,2.3350073e-7,0.0000026029109,0.0000037555035,0.00037653183],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960935,0.0000053606263,0.00016678644,0.000036816557,0.0001140202,0.00006769023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996639,0.000048217076,0.00013422203,0.000025070172,0.00012224013,0.000006357566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011770948,0.000045935805,0.000111431335,0.00013733034,0.000024453784,0.000055610784,0.000031744214,0.000017720959,0.000047834386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000897981,0.00003628366,0.000015323012,0.00007077536,0.000020181618,0.00028182333,0.000043489606,0.000041348594,0.0000022359322],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013166956,0.000074318465,0.4518237,0.0008932275,0.00006814515,0.000018730549,0.00089992577,0.000006905185,0.00066037395,0.5426885,0.0013691573,0.0014838229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018917238,0.00007397911,0.96929896,0.00019243853,0.00007960219,0.00001218689,0.002987646,0.00034215522,0.00025665987,0.013795181,0.010910803,0.00015865792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005520069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000014332342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52889335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006455723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006491938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14796047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3035890857","doi":"10.1075/jlp.18030.ves","title":"Language ideological debates about linguistic landscapes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Ideology; Signage; Context (archaeology); Linguistics; Ethnic group; Linguistic landscape; Status quo; Sociology; Nationalism; Language ideology; Political science; Media studies; History; Law; Politics; Advertising; Anthropology","score_opus":0.04384175651882448,"score_gpt":0.4233923232069269,"score_spread":0.3795505666881024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3035890857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97349364,0.003521412,0.00003200908,0.0052872514,0.00021725013,0.00003964074,0.0000085594365,0.000018964427,0.017381303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907732,0.00022333224,0.000394461,0.003967253,0.0038376315,2.9019796e-7,0.0000016768149,0.000005553532,0.00079662557],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992414,0.00010331123,0.00022656315,0.00006122793,0.00016948178,0.00019799855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999136,0.00023470585,0.00013189534,0.000044155313,0.00010701396,0.00034623218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024831656,0.00006714137,0.00015815577,0.000045358003,0.000125206,0.000061965206,0.00012829287,0.00006475945,0.0003525476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024683115,0.00005173169,0.000057154823,0.00008660903,0.00008673477,0.00005043618,0.000017298426,0.00017210802,0.000014546504],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002711886,0.000058473146,0.006377078,0.000052025356,0.00003674284,0.00021540452,0.94887626,0.000004663669,0.00037341597,0.033041652,0.0028297708,0.008107365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013331296,0.00036543544,0.007473303,0.000106208114,0.0001424343,0.00009845891,0.20157284,0.00020462963,0.0013128098,0.0014743974,0.78550506,0.00041133302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00067401835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009727042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78267527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015250742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018376995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38601488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382680232","doi":"10.1075/jlp.22125.vau","title":"ICT environmentalism and the sustainability game","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Conceptualization; Rhetoric; Information and Communications Technology; Rhetorical question; Politics; Public relations; Environmentalism; Political science; Sociology; Ecology; Law","score_opus":0.142401090833312,"score_gpt":0.4302776146673712,"score_spread":0.28787652383405915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382680232","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.979946,0.00077653583,0.0000044790945,0.016167168,0.000046293426,0.00004837483,0.000003899457,0.0000058707565,0.0030013365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897408,0.008533355,0.000009811642,0.0004124278,0.00021276649,5.862639e-7,0.0000015271148,0.0000020335792,0.001086682],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950624,0.00017915886,0.00009976289,0.000024567791,0.00010077553,0.0000894802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995663,0.00022720765,0.000058002952,0.0000672363,0.000026807287,0.000054413704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084434263,0.000026190533,0.000063253705,0.000029203517,0.00016791414,0.000038292015,0.00006806326,0.000025104651,0.00009194122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020660227,0.00001701166,0.000025127409,0.00005035156,0.00033633417,0.000057538095,0.000035006156,0.00007515066,0.0000029326293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027605101,0.000025763115,0.00628218,0.000031418153,0.000017040307,0.000019392633,0.88290095,0.0000013646854,0.000092070906,0.08520336,0.0014408713,0.023957985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010375833,0.000041849296,0.040532056,0.000018816376,0.000040385996,0.00003059223,0.68273556,0.00006611954,0.000013653695,0.023502616,0.25189668,0.000084064115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00045957233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010858232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2504558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003762445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021394708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12914768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383102274","doi":"10.1075/jlp.22126.mor","title":"“Hope dies – Action begins”","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Climate Change Communication and Perception","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Denial; Vision; Action (physics); Nationalism; Sociology; Epistemology; Aesthetics; Determinism; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Psychoanalysis; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.438425182919484,"score_gpt":0.5074250939270203,"score_spread":0.06899991100753627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383102274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97901165,0.00042520347,0.00000816643,0.005295505,0.00021352225,0.00002011315,0.000004532044,0.000018542876,0.015002774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820307,0.013664945,0.0000498743,0.00029296894,0.00075167103,3.376348e-7,0.0000041327266,0.0000033130032,0.0032020537],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960893,0.00006876213,0.00009605137,0.000021590009,0.000111240326,0.00009342545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996693,0.00008977386,0.00006852702,0.00005002313,0.000060985683,0.00006140543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033675434,0.000026024854,0.000057302717,0.000079450445,0.00017962065,0.00003787639,0.000062775725,0.000031800195,0.00016462633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012211909,0.000022297536,0.000027376474,0.000101236226,0.0000602292,0.00010687522,0.000016376627,0.00007140983,0.000022954395],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017020977,0.00005412935,0.005639948,0.000059400805,0.00003607086,0.00004550281,0.80599856,0.0000035439643,0.0027383172,0.035042133,0.021655666,0.12870967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021570563,0.000051673527,0.012505669,0.000042500098,0.000022275843,0.000016557839,0.3134844,0.000026279491,0.000087158114,0.0018003953,0.6716697,0.00007770108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002682923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005540194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65001404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026308206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026363745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18025428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406143571","doi":"10.1075/jlp.24126.mcc","title":"From social awareness to authoritarian other","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Crime, Deviance, and Social Control","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Moral panic; Authoritarianism; Framing (construction); Democracy; Ideology; Politics; Legitimacy; Sociology; Critical discourse analysis; Political science; Political economy; Law","score_opus":0.020322577248837473,"score_gpt":0.37674232172162286,"score_spread":0.3564197444727854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406143571","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9284988,0.0012932186,0.00078009325,0.010461038,0.0010426161,0.000082856306,0.0000463773,0.000014298965,0.057780672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9902358,0.000018498034,0.00017670964,0.0017234848,0.003845388,6.4691517e-7,6.0761505e-7,0.000004791411,0.003994084],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925154,0.0001176394,0.00019301297,0.00006180276,0.00017842343,0.00019759683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995068,0.00013115234,0.00007524458,0.000046665722,0.000118648706,0.000121489764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034436892,0.00005913003,0.00019116412,0.000074826596,0.0004282537,0.00009007242,0.00013453078,0.00008986856,0.00008650337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020817191,0.00005395946,0.00007506214,0.00011978138,0.000075409895,0.00007801682,0.000016425782,0.00012196008,0.000004265571],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043784155,0.0000658674,0.005829404,0.000017271203,0.00013806246,0.00007510694,0.52969223,6.0671135e-7,0.00044002602,0.42620745,0.015083112,0.022407057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007681384,0.00004856521,0.006391976,0.00007605336,0.00013176035,0.00000114947,0.23243465,0.000003532803,0.00015073699,0.030699557,0.72912216,0.00017171995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009561475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019817834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.714039,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006210842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003203776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99703395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416647151","doi":"10.1075/jlp.24257.cat","title":"“We are workers, we are not slaves”","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Language and Politics","topic":"Migration and Labor Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Embodied cognition; Negotiation; Ideology; Work (physics); Domestic work","score_opus":0.013768552187284098,"score_gpt":0.3202166545902886,"score_spread":0.30644810240300446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416647151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94269407,0.0049649957,0.00024655033,0.038458142,0.00050337304,0.00005831203,0.000029825262,0.000014989739,0.013029749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656494,0.0020020148,0.00027820686,0.0021142487,0.0005550585,2.8901025e-7,8.015256e-7,0.000004220534,0.029395742],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993295,0.00008445311,0.00019538467,0.000050735704,0.00017766826,0.0001622326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994107,0.000107276646,0.00018988013,0.00006598995,0.00011156301,0.00011462054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024609538,0.00005858955,0.00013913879,0.00009421302,0.0001598388,0.00008075316,0.000105828636,0.00007455069,0.00009136883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019040419,0.00004794135,0.00005696329,0.00014828697,0.00007571889,0.000087944456,0.000014861491,0.0001590374,0.0000030261115],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006113627,0.00020188124,0.071144074,0.00020296893,0.00020402244,0.0004819978,0.42821768,0.000036220034,0.00022453548,0.3761034,0.105906814,0.017215274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047614705,0.000034143235,0.005343078,0.00041846366,0.0000713405,0.000011558919,0.3595327,0.00007504818,0.00011575364,0.003145979,0.6306376,0.00013817124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016831914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021932449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5247308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045763718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015855509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19549915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}