{"meta":{"query_hash":"1a9a785ab8de","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law Religion and State"},"cohort_total":5,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":5,"exported":5,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/1a9a785ab8de","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Law+Religion+and+State"},"results":[{"id":"W2612628890","doi":"10.1163/22124810-00502003","title":"Religion, Education, and Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law Religion and State","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Sudbury","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Secular state; Public sphere; Pluralism (philosophy); Sociology; Secular education; Citizenship; Secularity; Religious education; State (computer science); Religious pluralism; Religious identity; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.019827770674781423,"score_gpt":0.3630119292963512,"score_spread":0.34318415862156976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612628890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02887943,0.04096326,0.0017941038,0.11124099,0.0007446945,0.000031934283,0.00024689082,0.000045287416,0.8160534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86436063,0.017100042,0.0013116945,0.016008299,0.0006533149,0.000035830144,0.00016848666,0.00002860281,0.100333124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982547,0.0008093171,0.000032720094,0.00012399367,0.00031095697,0.0004682289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998013,0.00072467065,0.00016176976,0.00017778,0.00043041745,0.00049227645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015671835,0.00029082553,0.0003196851,0.0013200017,0.009072146,0.007760055,0.00073269114,0.0021582842,0.011722273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002688676,0.00009722418,0.0001624733,0.0019488058,0.03012854,0.003161606,0.0023827527,0.0026759873,0.0008506779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007944458,0.000016063206,0.0014396104,0.00005689023,0.000003915592,0.00010158575,0.009864963,0.00014190278,0.00004620179,0.94787097,0.01978877,0.020661246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011466931,0.000018558376,0.009230262,0.0007053595,0.0000073121064,0.00009022752,0.01855407,0.00019072424,0.00007208928,0.17873935,0.79235786,0.000022674814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5997289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66888297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5997289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025104815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020836182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8052568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2773513383","doi":"10.1163/22124810-00503003","title":"Dilemmas of Civil Tribunals in Formulating Their Positions toward Religious Tribunals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law Religion and State","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Multiculturalism; Supreme court; Position (finance); Civil law (Civil law); Religious freedom; State (computer science); Immigration; Sociology; Public law; Business","score_opus":0.04054659897663527,"score_gpt":0.3440941087805466,"score_spread":0.3035475098039113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773513383","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16564104,0.0030443133,0.038063418,0.42576122,0.003183468,0.0006687131,0.000045260484,0.00015276989,0.36343983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9184137,0.00074189226,0.012106694,0.039548967,0.001162385,0.0004737461,0.000022429682,0.00010430895,0.027425826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91327786,0.049293686,0.0042267465,0.005657396,0.011412336,0.016131997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9471305,0.03114591,0.002707219,0.0022822903,0.008368653,0.008365533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.091131456,0.00069610594,0.0010986656,0.0033921073,0.040341426,0.034527067,0.0065828953,0.031301185,0.0077311946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116733715,0.0014570866,0.00141821,0.0020134565,0.038667,0.013618383,0.017823227,0.030001434,0.0014549417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029484407,0.00008560594,0.00093980477,0.000036437457,0.000028696177,0.00092167564,0.02031825,0.0008008661,0.00038059082,0.9511243,0.01093251,0.0144017665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020850557,0.00017531142,0.0018699715,0.0006606531,0.00007088649,0.0006085995,0.06204161,0.003818325,0.0010144598,0.6894401,0.2398299,0.00026175164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021820825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027225165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091131456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01598956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0300001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.481955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003543051","doi":"10.1163/22124810-00703003","title":"Honest Scales","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law Religion and State","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Perspective (graphical); Proportionality (law); Value (mathematics); Law; Test (biology); Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Social psychology; Psychology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Mathematics; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.01912068999241757,"score_gpt":0.308309223051352,"score_spread":0.28918853305893444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003543051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011889786,0.0008583511,0.05831699,0.0125219105,0.0032055385,0.0011928828,0.0016518963,0.00070533593,0.90965724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.324906,0.0014074595,0.086534694,0.012866657,0.0016587657,0.003037588,0.0023066422,0.0009531665,0.566329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810418,0.0060959794,0.0014380523,0.0023524011,0.008122509,0.00094937166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639602,0.010000716,0.0026599916,0.007545104,0.0144547,0.0013793171],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015486518,0.00074601086,0.00060750794,0.002146466,0.0035502533,0.005387822,0.001888289,0.0017403465,0.10666605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07906333,0.00037763215,0.0006540197,0.0018411322,0.004398166,0.0047845044,0.0046222224,0.00285229,0.035738483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023209763,0.00009886657,0.0044842917,0.00027018992,0.00003466028,0.00014320642,0.0060805054,0.00020323903,0.00081798,0.56433254,0.20019607,0.22310627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037055204,0.00011998287,0.0067823497,0.0003619477,0.000021387064,0.00029058722,0.0029255147,0.0005883973,0.00063293887,0.09913494,0.8890415,0.00006341319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029453714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006150488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10666605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020565328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029731633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35683352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3037096485","doi":"10.1163/22124810-00801003","title":"Deliberating across Difference","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law Religion and State","topic":"Social Media and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Arbitration; Perspective (graphical); Empathy; Political science; Scale (ratio); Key (lock); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Computer science; Geography; Computer security","score_opus":0.04631107269487284,"score_gpt":0.3578630637607071,"score_spread":0.31155199106583426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3037096485","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46672666,0.0014857847,0.12930486,0.06826317,0.0009776824,0.0010302885,0.00016885455,0.0002573546,0.33178532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9749937,0.00017075348,0.011367336,0.0030894894,0.00005031229,0.000243339,0.00005955243,0.00008088933,0.009944596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.90897113,0.068976745,0.0026413528,0.0058582453,0.007748607,0.0058040563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91442806,0.059617855,0.0037352054,0.011532629,0.0061006844,0.0045856177],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047224186,0.0007064928,0.00077776244,0.0023338688,0.01645932,0.013281473,0.0032179567,0.0037746741,0.007676837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.095718846,0.0005228123,0.00097366155,0.0017963141,0.032196954,0.014116818,0.02836535,0.007603196,0.0010551247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018121132,0.00009795776,0.006324864,0.00027857148,0.000081256694,0.0007055845,0.5443386,0.00069462456,0.0016628845,0.38309962,0.0038708644,0.05866402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052569532,0.00012886988,0.0028782263,0.0004878726,0.0000448819,0.00035882022,0.46758726,0.001586285,0.0015437539,0.29376036,0.23150076,0.00007030328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010247582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009540879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047224186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009554646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012679758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24974829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206700969","doi":"10.1163/22124810-2020004","title":"Deliberating across Difference","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law Religion and State","topic":"Religion, Society, and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deliberation; Arbitration; Perspective (graphical); Empathy; Political science; Scale (ratio); Key (lock); Deliberative democracy; Sociology; Law and economics; Public relations; Law; Social psychology; Psychology; Computer science; Democracy; Geography; Computer security","score_opus":0.036139296920999694,"score_gpt":0.33003094100335334,"score_spread":0.29389164408235363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206700969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48771402,0.0015654486,0.13946691,0.06781612,0.00092203193,0.0011428131,0.00014827732,0.00024475795,0.30097964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9742933,0.0001752218,0.012426859,0.003081327,0.000043172025,0.0002430905,0.0000541948,0.00007381149,0.009609031],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89739615,0.07766636,0.002997844,0.006567462,0.008457281,0.0069149453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9174061,0.054799166,0.00415246,0.011093564,0.007063422,0.0054853633],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05230108,0.0007285178,0.00080165954,0.0021011843,0.01704657,0.012255646,0.0034055081,0.0036958524,0.0068606613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096579075,0.0005129358,0.0010796649,0.0016052398,0.035188157,0.012430843,0.028859118,0.008033932,0.0009458845],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001661963,0.000092797636,0.0066519743,0.0002798905,0.00008326295,0.0007182142,0.56772614,0.00074215425,0.0016144962,0.36665532,0.0036464431,0.051623102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052649888,0.00013824383,0.0028931396,0.00050527434,0.000045199486,0.0003863016,0.49237022,0.0014893055,0.0014350449,0.2783407,0.22226875,0.000075279226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012771121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011460193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05230108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01132966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015806703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27659786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}