{"meta":{"query_hash":"d28a58d27189","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law and Courts"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d28a58d27189","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Law+and+Courts"},"results":[{"id":"W1969192061","doi":"10.1086/674453","title":"Theorizing the Constitutional Revolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Subject (documents); Character (mathematics); Order (exchange); Political science; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.020128829349175592,"score_gpt":0.28055381707631194,"score_spread":0.26042498772713635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969192061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05594345,0.003486138,0.007349537,0.021864804,0.0013263529,0.00007695975,0.000001997105,0.00001223109,0.9099385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99770445,0.0003194223,0.000064269945,0.0009089434,0.0009477242,4.786549e-7,7.330158e-8,6.65975e-7,0.00005395969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999413,0.0000942895,0.00012457398,0.00003543416,0.00024708954,0.00008557605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995353,0.00015952956,0.0001001443,0.000024080215,0.00013851687,0.00004238787],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010092965,0.000033888373,0.000076732555,0.000012015427,0.0010182186,0.00003344508,0.00007133282,0.000023012344,0.000018987352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014914363,0.000020072443,0.00003969459,0.000031432297,0.0017340066,0.000117714866,0.000013981991,0.00008119804,0.0000033112663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007808285,0.0000074162053,0.00059222145,6.061587e-7,0.000012614893,0.0000013102572,0.00059337047,0.0000042416923,0.000017505821,0.9968602,0.00054035947,0.001362355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010548104,0.00002440049,0.0014709478,0.00002638592,0.000019214578,0.000022744469,0.00057767396,0.0000037144678,0.000004959778,0.4424434,0.5552685,0.00003255401],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034467492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022804095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.941761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022183043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010777726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78314173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030363845","doi":"10.1086/673873","title":"Rehabilitating the Declaratory Theory of the Common Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legislation","score_opus":0.02214349315025743,"score_gpt":0.2970554508928305,"score_spread":0.27491195774257304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030363845","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92776686,0.0010164079,0.00000745421,0.007948975,0.00029590944,0.000083666106,7.738909e-7,0.000003936537,0.062876046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99850523,0.00004305889,0.00007487691,0.0010428384,0.00022304122,8.0075563e-7,1.4638265e-8,0.000002661985,0.000107471846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986139,0.00068383047,0.00022253837,0.000044053762,0.00032595612,0.000109755405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984017,0.0010494865,0.00028075106,0.00007876146,0.00014830114,0.00004100493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025254062,0.000052988657,0.0001502098,0.000004326095,0.00094529334,0.000035869118,0.00021458909,0.00003896186,0.000011400008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029494995,0.000022994094,0.0000964872,0.000036475525,0.0010994801,0.0000988949,0.000047814876,0.00017239556,5.5992837e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011392162,0.000016982129,0.0035819765,0.000007634581,0.000028008597,3.7304468e-7,0.02819059,0.0000048931556,0.00015250391,0.96589565,0.00035513967,0.0017548795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061286637,0.00023354309,0.076831155,0.00024324721,0.00014177617,0.000010653992,0.044794813,0.000012185933,0.0005051954,0.3253453,0.5510878,0.00018149838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085630815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021837344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6405503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000029384155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023246175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7270528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335318655","doi":"10.1086/677057","title":"The Politics of Judicial Retirement in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Kingdom; Political science; Test (biology); Law; Mandatory retirement; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02627512220332856,"score_gpt":0.2725991933721596,"score_spread":0.24632407116883104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335318655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96780646,0.00063896104,0.000008564938,0.013215119,0.0002421282,0.0000415525,0.0000010826622,5.897083e-7,0.018045548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987195,0.0003922945,0.0000037781485,0.0006742906,0.00019577798,3.3623508e-7,3.6922163e-8,7.185174e-7,0.0000132566865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993459,0.00011160093,0.00016959617,0.00002453286,0.00025692116,0.00009144145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993926,0.00033101515,0.00012015061,0.000022412227,0.000099556004,0.000034239696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007917357,0.000029277066,0.000100169585,0.0000115899375,0.0005109467,0.000016964817,0.000066650224,0.000011665894,0.000001707357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013256005,0.000014834403,0.000015406718,0.00004448128,0.00074415706,0.00002269048,0.00001831009,0.00006779718,3.1208568e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023715971,0.0000035515377,0.005062336,9.03478e-7,0.000012231229,0.0000016235117,0.00082399824,0.0000037697837,0.0000013539158,0.9934758,0.00019892902,0.00039177906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013995025,0.00007551273,0.042358845,0.00011280882,0.00006174595,0.000008194504,0.006179727,0.00004813056,0.0000209306,0.46384805,0.48579705,0.000089520916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9480491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9561671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52962774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050373594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003676127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39298403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000357133","doi":"10.1086/704740","title":"Advisors to Elites","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Economic Justice; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03423613159496956,"score_gpt":0.30169989213797777,"score_spread":0.2674637605430082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000357133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49202472,0.002825312,0.00030307609,0.13538882,0.00043617887,0.00008488975,0.0000037058153,0.000016004837,0.36891732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921403,0.00025871006,0.00012141901,0.0067827892,0.0006544336,2.725637e-7,2.9776356e-8,0.0000010684859,0.000041005067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995632,0.000020750354,0.00010531663,0.000037596506,0.00019546165,0.00007763158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996567,0.000036255664,0.000045487275,0.000011110544,0.000092153416,0.00015832754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012946212,0.000030211937,0.00008984007,0.000009972216,0.0002453872,0.00002778981,0.000059197966,0.00001551259,0.000038523278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009633166,0.000023307026,0.000031497446,0.000048518472,0.00012647253,0.000084097876,0.000017018743,0.0000484194,0.000009670924],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033670807,0.0000138532,0.0013897157,0.0000019509866,0.000024393823,0.000023893283,0.010816439,0.000007813062,0.000106621366,0.98001164,0.0039249198,0.0036451067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010425329,0.00010511382,0.0015844988,0.00001946729,0.00001440804,0.0000034380114,0.00216555,8.2753945e-7,0.000027968103,0.024948899,0.97097665,0.000048952505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003253396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001492382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008961817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006222012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18873447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154912574","doi":"10.1086/714576","title":"The Emerging Authority of Magistrate Judges within US District Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Delegation; Hierarchy","score_opus":0.025616823907762352,"score_gpt":0.30600119334209236,"score_spread":0.28038436943433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154912574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84577346,0.008938817,0.00008761482,0.012357018,0.0010421132,0.000046942616,0.000009566536,0.0000065644613,0.13173789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974991,0.0017568644,0.000053610027,0.00014228892,0.0003084758,3.9410847e-7,2.3309633e-7,0.0000016789645,0.00023734332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904966,0.00010145083,0.00027494374,0.000060859245,0.00038472321,0.00012836485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911875,0.0001422221,0.0002588046,0.00004533861,0.00036229342,0.00007257758],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078955095,0.000055065182,0.00015485802,0.000010795258,0.0009175747,0.000069005146,0.00009714986,0.00003164788,0.000018704031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000168059,0.00003618888,0.000070216636,0.00007155467,0.0006258533,0.000112224305,0.000031388634,0.00012430336,6.2125804e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023735245,0.00003878176,0.007917696,0.0000048698294,0.00007139716,0.000079818856,0.0017122199,0.000009708587,0.000110508314,0.9871548,0.00082872633,0.0020477627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005993127,0.00014266216,0.061849542,0.00017035207,0.00021092726,0.0001329428,0.015285071,0.000014812723,0.0008905246,0.42453563,0.49592367,0.0002445396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009706754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025161167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56261915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025646645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031614947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70573354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217106214","doi":"10.1086/716786","title":"Giving Succor to Extremism?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Free speech; Political science; Politics; Violent extremism; Law; Human rights; Speech act; Law and economics; Terrorism; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02902656697894096,"score_gpt":0.30602295462387435,"score_spread":0.2769963876449334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217106214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47997993,0.004399485,0.00040343072,0.024775567,0.0009329395,0.000040857307,0.0000026517125,0.000008973895,0.48945615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966508,0.00035622914,0.0002078165,0.0014945047,0.0005800419,3.1182574e-7,4.451824e-8,0.0000012695685,0.0007089599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948007,0.000032950513,0.00011634104,0.00004670537,0.00022505026,0.000098867924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956447,0.000058836184,0.000049747276,0.000022005088,0.00020025499,0.000104683226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026313122,0.00003276888,0.000098700155,0.000013619857,0.00037689472,0.00004620453,0.00004707276,0.00002056008,0.000094849034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011207992,0.000027244618,0.000038501097,0.00005383696,0.00011096227,0.000091554284,0.00002488718,0.000055739438,0.0000041944663],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012460566,0.000034251494,0.002475747,0.0000026276164,0.00003262682,0.0001817067,0.004050742,0.000003992255,0.0005458809,0.98291445,0.0025606768,0.0071848454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118438875,0.000028517647,0.003455726,0.00006207186,0.000017373359,0.000044964592,0.002692221,3.7863214e-7,0.00016051572,0.044254668,0.9491016,0.00006348678],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049456913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001438108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94654095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022576174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001678611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28988078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353075517","doi":"10.1017/jlc.2022.18","title":"Dignity Disputed","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Notre Dame","keywords":"Dignity; Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Vision; Law; Meaning (existential); Constitutionalism; Value (mathematics); Constitution; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.03030208408132806,"score_gpt":0.32918236262888007,"score_spread":0.298880278547552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4353075517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33332202,0.00016273806,0.00016677847,0.005908423,0.0005813231,0.00003526994,0.000009857233,0.00002602655,0.6597876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730223,0.00016863245,0.000057085803,0.00064697076,0.00040815034,1.934527e-7,4.5214605e-7,0.0000016530092,0.0014146458],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994946,0.000046983405,0.000108216926,0.000030451882,0.00020303245,0.00011668135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956626,0.00011769349,0.00007460145,0.000025773465,0.00009609746,0.000119593395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035142445,0.000029707291,0.00007920196,0.000023940129,0.00027652032,0.000031556992,0.00006012131,0.000024008585,0.000038723978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005993426,0.000023960858,0.000035162975,0.0000674153,0.00040678316,0.00011113015,0.0000115242465,0.00006747573,0.000009590027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037710406,0.00000791779,0.00066327053,0.0000014523744,0.0000085871725,0.00002957072,0.00038852193,0.0000025626691,0.000011195735,0.99528086,0.0031014385,0.00050085597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091087684,0.000027482172,0.0021222818,0.000012141694,0.000012047839,0.000014369269,0.00043341558,0.0000026418231,0.000007797854,0.0153496275,0.98188806,0.000039044902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037885213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010535249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97993124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016325524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032725369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21267988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406623865","doi":"10.1017/jlc.2024.29","title":"The Demand for Insurance: Incorporating the Severity of Losing Office into the Insurance Model of Judicial Independence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Actuarial science; Business; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022529103434756805,"score_gpt":0.23733394365056035,"score_spread":0.21480484021580354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406623865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97714245,0.005680368,0.007395176,0.0012800773,0.00074423075,0.0002568468,0.000057788086,0.0000025025072,0.0074405824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99842197,0.0008550662,0.000145615,0.00034600642,0.0001863982,0.0000054359175,3.0463806e-7,0.00000760976,0.000031616033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848306,0.000038749433,0.0011384296,0.00012768377,0.000069125614,0.00014297316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974299,0.00040457072,0.0017310389,0.00020025038,0.00020436196,0.000029860674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026820505,0.00009291141,0.00045400174,0.0000463636,0.00047399406,0.00007490025,0.0003744137,0.00008530153,9.947327e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017161154,0.0000648827,0.00013911077,0.00008965203,0.00043484918,0.00022517168,0.000060906987,0.00020435597,3.8811453e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025054533,0.000048735998,0.049143773,0.0001047226,0.0001491446,5.2020573e-7,0.0017248013,0.003122654,0.00008863006,0.94233656,0.00020738691,0.0028225235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010332526,0.00012566746,0.031336002,0.00022953373,0.000029854264,0.000012593871,0.00047620072,0.01398334,0.0006117539,0.94935447,0.0026550225,0.00015232136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006132433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005562144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02127952,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041258943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011007713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36456272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}