{"meta":{"query_hash":"d28a58d27189","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law and Courts"},"cohort_total":8,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":8,"exported":8,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d28a58d27189","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Law+and+Courts"},"results":[{"id":"W1969192061","doi":"10.1086/674453","title":"Theorizing the Constitutional Revolution","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Subject (documents); Character (mathematics); Order (exchange); Political science; Political economy; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.020128829349175592,"score_gpt":0.28055381707631194,"score_spread":0.26042498772713635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969192061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05695663,0.006097938,0.042554576,0.07008514,0.0006154853,0.00007620104,0.0001293947,0.00009993862,0.8233847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854615,0.0011902563,0.003518861,0.002141184,0.0002673611,0.00007133217,0.000047631165,0.000027918952,0.0072739697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99396014,0.004076201,0.00011557439,0.000560069,0.00073684123,0.0005512184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921779,0.0057168817,0.00044983736,0.000851354,0.0004724062,0.0003317361],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009139467,0.00029743536,0.00039544867,0.002925683,0.004447911,0.0069482257,0.001666303,0.0038954385,0.006473734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010580138,0.00023881617,0.0005232921,0.0021103343,0.05919548,0.008462379,0.0053995433,0.0052704006,0.000462429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.060783e-7,0.0000019377258,0.00003400638,0.000004242299,5.266665e-7,0.000009841513,0.0004906347,0.0001052992,0.0000067260594,0.9987392,0.00026672514,0.0003400264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073333003,0.000004439019,0.00008618555,0.00003811611,0.0000028848715,0.000017597915,0.00085450703,0.0004665012,0.000031135733,0.98137957,0.017109035,0.0000028109682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037414068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030009884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009139467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072972146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004209965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052945256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030363845","doi":"10.1086/673873","title":"Rehabilitating the Declaratory Theory of the Common Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legislation","score_opus":0.02214349315025743,"score_gpt":0.2970554508928305,"score_spread":0.27491195774257304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030363845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0530696,0.0009077715,0.115987845,0.08286067,0.0013051673,0.0001241955,0.000110814806,0.00016461,0.7454692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716741,0.00021868855,0.007914943,0.0034387566,0.00031967548,0.00007944075,0.000041496885,0.000042908436,0.016269969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886269,0.005029292,0.00051644485,0.0017867144,0.0028198601,0.0012207323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854843,0.0060193087,0.0011904611,0.003608137,0.002957431,0.0007404359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014133658,0.0004409115,0.0007790843,0.0014582542,0.005568845,0.010105038,0.003106271,0.0079288855,0.01032689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025009057,0.00040911147,0.0008876278,0.0008675006,0.0341782,0.011394105,0.0074998722,0.009439806,0.0013056272],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024594617,0.0000035983512,0.000041919706,0.000003564388,8.929898e-7,0.000023218801,0.00028579435,0.00012692864,0.000017426588,0.9984633,0.0005593915,0.00047154567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010881587,0.0000086799355,0.00007563237,0.000032312244,0.0000045712836,0.000036438447,0.0003664662,0.0018118045,0.00010450185,0.9878604,0.009679637,0.000008761889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007367039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066328035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014133658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007642882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007873652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07474685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2335318655","doi":"10.1086/677057","title":"The Politics of Judicial Retirement in Canada and the United Kingdom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Supreme court; Kingdom; Political science; Test (biology); Law; Mandatory retirement; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02627512220332856,"score_gpt":0.2725991933721596,"score_spread":0.24632407116883104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2335318655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95053595,0.0023098758,0.00021145429,0.013343762,0.00007474557,0.000018588777,0.00039147952,0.000011170089,0.03310298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99685764,0.00030226965,0.000033571872,0.00039520627,0.000007658774,0.0000017691074,0.000041783936,0.0000028801567,0.0023573257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99557835,0.0005431307,0.00008148378,0.00025062295,0.000819307,0.0027270222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852048,0.0024355708,0.0019108227,0.00035275662,0.0052320804,0.004863902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026744301,0.000101751524,0.0003215711,0.0019576615,0.010854206,0.004061204,0.0009293176,0.0011239846,0.0035579468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113903945,0.00017499244,0.00020460793,0.002920874,0.0052800765,0.0006681,0.0018754882,0.0015838026,0.00017161769],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006372533,0.00011689532,0.64625096,0.00014161016,0.00010593748,0.0019375603,0.052935086,0.0033475186,0.0009270575,0.18563136,0.04598168,0.06198703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040036535,0.000046398745,0.83987975,0.00030983708,0.000042700933,0.00023180134,0.06486572,0.0016343718,0.00047865967,0.0039752563,0.08837617,0.0001193417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9836512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9938962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07860672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07860672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05673881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5703343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000357133","doi":"10.1086/704740","title":"Advisors to Elites","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Advice (programming); Legal advice; Politics; Public relations; Political science; Set (abstract data type); Economic Justice; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03423613159496956,"score_gpt":0.30169989213797777,"score_spread":0.2674637605430082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000357133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.821481,0.0017437141,0.002164933,0.032735184,0.00023953387,0.00007437728,0.00023275787,0.00010155201,0.14122696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432325,0.00024387405,0.00022259538,0.0011747758,0.0001504944,0.000009110383,0.00002135973,0.000008331028,0.0038461473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99070626,0.0049345098,0.0003190033,0.00073313795,0.0012516099,0.0020554871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8577814,0.08698788,0.028101541,0.0048173782,0.007849906,0.014461863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006884495,0.00022991933,0.0004756611,0.0024085704,0.0033056461,0.0035026132,0.00060042023,0.0020702563,0.021314053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10572564,0.00017571173,0.0001664738,0.0018142728,0.003040391,0.0019669207,0.0020569214,0.0026350468,0.0014071998],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012371303,0.0010667664,0.5341,0.0006167156,0.0002392225,0.001614488,0.022910072,0.0030616685,0.0013676451,0.10562168,0.058203578,0.26996106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049878506,0.00079617684,0.63675,0.0011130428,0.00033475782,0.0006860104,0.04598399,0.008749852,0.0022534465,0.15085079,0.15184537,0.00013776626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015937658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023795137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021314053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032870956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002819458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07130259},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154912574","doi":"10.1086/714576","title":"The Emerging Authority of Magistrate Judges within US District Courts","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Magistrate; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Discretion; Supreme court; Delegation; Hierarchy","score_opus":0.025616823907762352,"score_gpt":0.30600119334209236,"score_spread":0.28038436943433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154912574","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9783724,0.0006975457,0.0008263487,0.00202638,0.000017454608,0.000014486035,0.00012680472,0.000010139497,0.017908426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991365,0.000058693076,0.00007335649,0.00011650314,0.00001184685,0.0000019884699,0.000021841142,0.000001290954,0.0005781151],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934535,0.0023488086,0.00026372602,0.0010380582,0.0013901701,0.0015058123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973605,0.009714814,0.006351514,0.001338609,0.005888153,0.0031019805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008552971,0.000070863396,0.0002574221,0.0027792673,0.0037350934,0.004370579,0.001094729,0.0008521667,0.00348081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03086601,0.00020910309,0.00016129093,0.001974538,0.0026163282,0.0013857636,0.002404518,0.0014468107,0.00035819036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022928836,0.000093457784,0.8170338,0.00009261074,0.00007381284,0.0004613641,0.05067806,0.000715782,0.0025638836,0.06749647,0.0059979665,0.054563455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013429048,0.00006694639,0.95402074,0.00011297758,0.000036236237,0.000107583655,0.024037646,0.00083460426,0.00074614363,0.006868529,0.013116271,0.00003887299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05210817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17625916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05210817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005470162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033407153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10360974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217106214","doi":"10.1086/716786","title":"Giving Succor to Extremism?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Democracy; Free speech; Political science; Politics; Violent extremism; Law; Human rights; Speech act; Law and economics; Terrorism; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02902656697894096,"score_gpt":0.30602295462387435,"score_spread":0.2769963876449334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217106214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73692775,0.0026134413,0.0050988025,0.091163374,0.00072908367,0.00004694138,0.000112358066,0.000048529015,0.16325963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547464,0.0002674531,0.00012278736,0.002435589,0.00026401164,0.000005283097,0.000013888873,0.0000062059516,0.0014100451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99078536,0.005177139,0.00051145453,0.00074127055,0.0011963254,0.0015884675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92925006,0.04187462,0.0131352665,0.0041124746,0.0049338914,0.0066935797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009246824,0.00019369274,0.00039772046,0.0016203868,0.00368752,0.0041307714,0.0008233971,0.0034781168,0.009429277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09207582,0.00018249862,0.00028149062,0.0008110822,0.008038338,0.0024875079,0.0019099242,0.0046362663,0.0008714595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000678403,0.00045924896,0.37011102,0.00048950664,0.00032886775,0.008035112,0.038451016,0.0010610439,0.0023250852,0.41233397,0.035953335,0.12977351],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013772039,0.0005989711,0.22776593,0.0017419145,0.00033991074,0.008911482,0.061470095,0.0028388584,0.0035190426,0.5608344,0.13164468,0.00019710195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019455865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042123846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009429277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010976875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011363514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048902452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4353075517","doi":"10.1017/jlc.2022.18","title":"Dignity Disputed","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Notre Dame","keywords":"Dignity; Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Vision; Law; Meaning (existential); Constitutionalism; Value (mathematics); Constitution; Political science; Sociology; Democracy; Philosophy; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.03030208408132806,"score_gpt":0.32918236262888007,"score_spread":0.298880278547552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4353075517","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057924476,0.0042497804,0.011334503,0.07985099,0.0031827153,0.00016271492,0.00029054,0.00007546955,0.8429289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875702,0.0010644317,0.001946501,0.0364571,0.001030673,0.00015024793,0.00015158266,0.000040966857,0.071588375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102074,0.0022071365,0.0006728504,0.0020397352,0.0025589939,0.0015005477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592376,0.0019165786,0.0002757796,0.0006283997,0.0008782673,0.0003771855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008160481,0.00031947487,0.0006475303,0.0010367754,0.0068864212,0.007812858,0.0022022086,0.013334436,0.010882554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016977549,0.00037828524,0.00056528783,0.00069238764,0.01949754,0.0057695033,0.008560055,0.011352677,0.0013988061],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018204391,0.000013007921,0.00026548115,0.000023829929,0.000006409116,0.0003882935,0.002493777,0.000068665846,0.00031370204,0.98577917,0.005278488,0.005351033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041669784,0.00008452093,0.0008874616,0.00056504714,0.00004287861,0.0009999232,0.0036850024,0.00044572353,0.0016133955,0.57130915,0.42026058,0.00006465796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009069687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00983292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013334436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006862907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049794137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406623865","doi":"10.1017/jlc.2024.29","title":"The Demand for Insurance: Incorporating the Severity of Losing Office into the Insurance Model of Judicial Independence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Courts","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Independence (probability theory); Actuarial science; Business; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.022529103434756805,"score_gpt":0.23733394365056035,"score_spread":0.21480484021580354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406623865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.842202,0.00065143686,0.10302745,0.012021181,0.000113156006,0.000095449446,0.0011255948,0.00014601946,0.0406177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957391,0.00013936851,0.0008719143,0.00009154587,0.000068417794,0.000013321809,0.00008007032,0.000011332325,0.0029849727],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852496,0.0004845385,0.000064793814,0.00021999382,0.00020044479,0.0005053369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98583335,0.009427098,0.0021133292,0.0006147527,0.00063175894,0.0013796411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003022133,0.00049836416,0.001246645,0.0014852217,0.000925997,0.004188152,0.0024242038,0.0036005413,0.012076485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012154107,0.0008909552,0.0010956284,0.0013262528,0.0027305863,0.0032799293,0.0020801518,0.0032562625,0.00077993184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023562966,0.00069697615,0.034568273,0.00008505025,0.00012296694,0.0006958909,0.00048858323,0.44080645,0.0008921809,0.5092381,0.003821743,0.008348162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006212129,0.00010558605,0.0075162826,0.00003147271,0.000057410183,0.000121920006,0.0004253233,0.7775871,0.00015142947,0.21250628,0.0013779845,0.00005706782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01413494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010810858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01413494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035457634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017340636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04039991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}