{"meta":{"query_hash":"89b07d0daab9","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law and Religion"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/89b07d0daab9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Law+and+Religion"},"results":[{"id":"W1586824842","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400000692","title":"Religion in the Abortion Discourse in Singapore: A Case Study of the Relevance of Religious Arguments in Law-Making in Multi-Religious Democracies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Torture; Human rights; Appeal; Law; Autonomy; Population; Political science; Birth control; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Family planning","score_opus":0.021157216881091043,"score_gpt":0.3464194949883225,"score_spread":0.3252622781072314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586824842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9601721,0.0013393229,0.00027046565,0.014859484,0.00006086461,0.000053141455,0.0000268198,0.000006998011,0.023210837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944173,0.0006472067,0.00017941979,0.0012273254,0.000025014726,0.000031877644,0.000014331826,0.0000079371375,0.0034496267],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891071,0.008435047,0.000342575,0.00031328318,0.0007522439,0.0010498092],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98799837,0.0076375273,0.0017557788,0.0004041915,0.0006472762,0.0015569126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009236389,0.00045723267,0.00061050826,0.0017029796,0.026149444,0.007075437,0.0018312243,0.005540711,0.004030923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011005482,0.0005138541,0.0006311424,0.0027127683,0.017910792,0.0046704244,0.008822786,0.008452825,0.0004238086],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001404994,0.000085295535,0.005726957,0.00006929507,0.0000076000247,0.0066097295,0.9732868,0.000037614114,0.0002580484,0.010211062,0.0007884648,0.0029051222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010544515,0.000053962307,0.0075433874,0.00019556559,0.000014420136,0.0013968322,0.965415,0.0002155269,0.00029508607,0.001186249,0.023648582,0.000024840409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073619895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1609155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073619895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01484704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0088813435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14638275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964385228","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.17","title":"THE VIRTUES OF LAW IN THE POLITICS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Politics; Virtue; Law; Normative; Sociology; Religious freedom; Political science; Ambiguity; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011678544665698504,"score_gpt":0.2851194748262653,"score_spread":0.2734409301605668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964385228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2123417,0.0013037622,0.020351956,0.05943636,0.00019463357,0.000043790486,0.000041617106,0.000067955334,0.70621824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99784446,0.00005527857,0.0003999655,0.0003583215,0.000019931646,0.0000062776585,0.0000022420918,0.0000047198537,0.0013088525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99347454,0.004513272,0.00013532618,0.0003243818,0.0008690466,0.00068342156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922559,0.0047357855,0.0006255337,0.00081746734,0.000848089,0.0007171581],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007964982,0.00012987506,0.00029048248,0.0012672191,0.0074693593,0.010728637,0.000650743,0.0023006739,0.0027272033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009782564,0.0002760468,0.00026708195,0.00062409544,0.09373714,0.0045334646,0.0040239897,0.0033366312,0.00022133745],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003521842,0.0000041503336,0.00027367935,0.0000038559647,0.000001060786,0.000014952982,0.0015365297,0.000082009974,0.00006484411,0.9972114,0.00020142835,0.0006025452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015724201,0.000011224299,0.0014363227,0.00003782685,0.0000047030344,0.000036421152,0.0035497104,0.0006493135,0.0001717095,0.9777829,0.016292913,0.000011268348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020809265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023677139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020809265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084230555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063852677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061113894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114692900","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.35","title":"CHRISTIAN PRACTICE AS THE FOUNDATION FOR MODERN POLITICAL THEOLOGY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodoxy; Politics; Archbishop; Sovereignty; Political theology; State (computer science); Dominion; Theology; Philosophy; Catholic theology; Religious studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04127867305509867,"score_gpt":0.3990068253821988,"score_spread":0.3577281523271001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114692900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02837167,0.037584107,0.010186612,0.10869171,0.0031447473,0.00006170434,0.000058980695,0.00008077404,0.8118197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92128026,0.009025584,0.0041446,0.0076526706,0.0035380695,0.000109168854,0.000036845526,0.0000776025,0.054135256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969074,0.0017670662,0.00009683361,0.0003732284,0.00043239506,0.00042308818],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973109,0.0014022355,0.00018388909,0.00051343394,0.00025258044,0.00033692847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00551836,0.00032340473,0.00040034458,0.0015293958,0.0075347754,0.008801212,0.00080104213,0.0031867311,0.0056740227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004379988,0.00025027027,0.00020070617,0.0011204589,0.045305356,0.005950553,0.0037754618,0.0077880495,0.0008032171],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013742949,0.0000038155604,0.000027708424,0.000009410213,4.3411043e-7,0.000008461349,0.0021929308,0.000036353395,0.000016141403,0.99481636,0.0012859933,0.001601136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010581367,0.000011769004,0.00016160152,0.00016001884,0.0000012732969,0.000028258824,0.002016417,0.00018508632,0.00006348614,0.77126414,0.22609004,0.000007401709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004306162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043441267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008801212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008089895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060182223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058696628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143711301","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.26","title":"COPTS AND THE MILLET PARTNERSHIP: THE INTRA-COMMUNAL DYNAMICS BEHIND EGYPTIAN SECTARIANISM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sectarianism; Scholarship; Politics; Dynamics (music); Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.009595350778706059,"score_gpt":0.2508278721558864,"score_spread":0.24123252137718038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143711301","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8705243,0.000517862,0.0007372505,0.005650233,0.000017936309,0.000010636827,0.000015972337,0.0000076083033,0.12251823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985789,0.00005082979,0.000026628852,0.00004326562,0.0000029714777,0.000001317165,0.000001211593,0.0000010483902,0.0012938107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928576,0.0003580549,0.000014267133,0.000047470112,0.00008403617,0.00021046471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992155,0.0003220917,0.00018146537,0.000060583396,0.000082937695,0.00013746327],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012234498,0.000090668975,0.000084453604,0.00067824445,0.0047928626,0.004634445,0.00032604107,0.00070800894,0.003607428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015101258,0.00009870049,0.000050346975,0.00093770673,0.014340367,0.0019388351,0.0039372207,0.0012337157,0.0001330106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046070738,0.000023168186,0.0063318554,0.000033095428,0.0000056405097,0.00077304774,0.24816823,0.00018019507,0.00035378733,0.7304437,0.0015188687,0.012122262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003144882,0.000062328974,0.035836123,0.00023193345,0.000012518621,0.00055612315,0.67879546,0.0012950787,0.0007863849,0.108985476,0.17337735,0.000029747447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011131746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022771897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011131746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044368412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023576769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032191634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253394476","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400003921","title":"On the Pope, Cartoons, and Apostates: Shari‘a 2006","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Apostasy; Islam; Sharia; Law; Aside; Doctrine; Afghan; Legal doctrine; Political science; Perspective (graphical); History; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.01984051205346609,"score_gpt":0.29866378093598844,"score_spread":0.27882326888252235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253394476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4509698,0.011207989,0.0009370249,0.046630375,0.0027087468,0.00005427355,0.00016465863,0.000059185826,0.48726794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.921748,0.0042921486,0.00043250876,0.0069547454,0.0008648303,0.000024896057,0.00006321693,0.000050851733,0.0655688],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915206,0.00032759865,0.000017752749,0.00008594019,0.00023805686,0.00017859654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913955,0.0003769517,0.00014863159,0.00006661691,0.00011267702,0.000155541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016422331,0.00041357309,0.000218833,0.0007228477,0.014596817,0.004007843,0.0006077436,0.0021127446,0.0038395426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024349354,0.00032906546,0.00013858643,0.0012625164,0.009998394,0.00278521,0.0038926753,0.0048360582,0.000541108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010555307,0.00008313496,0.003128632,0.00024228485,0.000010017968,0.0026567199,0.65133274,0.00007390327,0.0012781152,0.22710091,0.06981375,0.04417434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008639871,0.00005532754,0.009476202,0.00038717213,0.000004863405,0.00058577774,0.1846704,0.000085628344,0.0005659988,0.005134985,0.7989963,0.0000287254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091850115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024787586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014596817,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031730523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024232976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023022234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499919811","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400000813","title":"Reclaiming the Nation: Muslim Women and the Law in India. By Vrinda Narain. University of Toronto Press2008. Pp. 213. $52.00. ISBN: 0-802-09278-0.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology; Media studies; Engineering","score_opus":0.007348899907242034,"score_gpt":0.2289151877379707,"score_spread":0.22156628783072868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499919811","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023560487,0.90035033,0.00018893462,0.04902289,0.0044309585,0.000016860899,0.00020649473,0.00006461119,0.043362875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0841574,0.73936546,0.0007539371,0.0058763153,0.0038971456,0.00005536228,0.00040956686,0.00008362141,0.16540119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99956435,0.00014345403,0.00002905781,0.000041066258,0.00013623624,0.00008582836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992906,0.00027076056,0.00011560243,0.000040463485,0.00012335707,0.00015924148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007302215,0.0011969028,0.0004971957,0.0016944275,0.0026735603,0.003674139,0.0012416554,0.0023241816,0.016392281],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015042925,0.00071843737,0.00029038225,0.0033751477,0.0043812552,0.003913102,0.0020788468,0.0026808965,0.0042101527],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036417452,0.00002535752,0.0010209607,0.0011303091,0.000019564486,0.00030894874,0.0176816,0.00011656552,0.00023054126,0.03622102,0.80209124,0.1411174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074475915,0.000017640867,0.008717105,0.0019988953,0.000015803389,0.00052153296,0.014003243,0.000084091604,0.00012940777,0.00725083,0.9672298,0.000024121615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.102679454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2121795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102679454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049606957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053706756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20416361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575386710","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2016.36","title":"WHAT'S THE HARM IN POLYGAMY? MULTICULTURAL TOLERATION AND WOMEN'S EXPERIENCE OF PLURAL MARRIAGE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitutionality; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Freedom of religion; Duty; Toleration; Substantive due process; Due Process Clause; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.025441613290251394,"score_gpt":0.31444987974148836,"score_spread":0.28900826645123695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575386710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7394054,0.013935395,0.0009827132,0.14232603,0.0014105716,0.000027849284,0.000027922124,0.000030948355,0.10185324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98976326,0.0014855276,0.00011689606,0.0046595037,0.0002263817,0.000011516758,0.000004109937,0.000010437221,0.0037222656],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99150413,0.0066203983,0.00012556037,0.00023604032,0.0005487605,0.0009651551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965814,0.001659664,0.00046840927,0.00016539702,0.00022399395,0.0009011586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052659977,0.00041531262,0.00056234346,0.0011710898,0.027033847,0.009906568,0.0011415629,0.003555322,0.0023667568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008555782,0.00038083873,0.00036911023,0.0011169752,0.051121168,0.007788146,0.0098270895,0.0050609084,0.00016341965],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012231194,0.000017849161,0.0015367068,0.000024790419,0.0000044155636,0.0004218008,0.96855104,0.0000119621445,0.00011089621,0.024745695,0.0013397,0.0032227812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000055888195,0.00003583901,0.0014708041,0.000088086425,0.000004619123,0.0006246063,0.96057004,0.00003600248,0.000056131586,0.00703972,0.030053308,0.000015341366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020152366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026711075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027033847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035761136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033561366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040070117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587299222","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2015.37","title":"Biblical Narrative and the Formation of Rabbinic Law. By Jane L. Kanarek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. 212. $90.00 (cloth). ISBN: 9781107047815.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"King's University College; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019501957356236888,"score_gpt":0.22625743418962468,"score_spread":0.2067554768333878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587299222","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001997419,0.8294602,0.00086009654,0.064799115,0.0007701988,0.000014975534,0.00012342006,0.0000544092,0.1019202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30479455,0.5295486,0.0025968908,0.007991058,0.0026958184,0.00010189,0.00023726674,0.00020045364,0.1518334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992293,0.0004282442,0.00004954323,0.00006234967,0.0001616751,0.00006892744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875903,0.0007076019,0.00022490126,0.00008804253,0.00015617488,0.00006426407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016015902,0.00058034336,0.0004991091,0.0028800457,0.002853199,0.0052587595,0.0008834461,0.0023863544,0.013304712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049202614,0.00060370617,0.00020280993,0.0041311993,0.011731126,0.010199653,0.002222858,0.0030966573,0.0026233143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034586887,0.000026996526,0.00021636265,0.0006509303,0.000013673334,0.00013682772,0.015880475,0.00018137845,0.00013674606,0.63115406,0.25368667,0.09788129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001562347,0.000009078643,0.001996004,0.0016529979,0.000008381357,0.00024085557,0.006589849,0.00017064076,0.0001468918,0.26472193,0.7244236,0.000024166533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017168984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0291247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017168984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058199153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035069862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044508696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796185122","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2018.10","title":"JUDGING RELIGION AND JUDGES' RELIGIONS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Precept; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial opinion; Faith; Law; Political science; Religious freedom; Sociology; Epistemology; Economic freedom; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015936084388315463,"score_gpt":0.3056923283996676,"score_spread":0.28975624401135214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796185122","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85836744,0.0004962605,0.0021888416,0.009610746,0.00016916613,0.00005734533,0.00006199426,0.000011100118,0.12903707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990633,0.000050319668,0.00017063592,0.00026228544,0.000019002646,0.0000040097357,0.0000049979794,0.000001567675,0.0004237685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823943,0.010205905,0.0007476744,0.00085739925,0.0041355994,0.0016590713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83829314,0.109180495,0.019987129,0.0028548206,0.022961661,0.006722785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021961886,0.00011335688,0.00028469623,0.0027001142,0.0041125594,0.00559014,0.0006954153,0.0014001302,0.0036777558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14629568,0.00014903475,0.00018486651,0.0017676795,0.014040987,0.0021533833,0.0022763838,0.0021731723,0.00026556532],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045995347,0.00032784123,0.5556232,0.00017171288,0.00015040716,0.0011859956,0.096091196,0.0013857882,0.0021553042,0.28383616,0.010641169,0.047971305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018470961,0.0002973953,0.616266,0.00076269597,0.00017443116,0.00046725405,0.10953186,0.005359282,0.002918985,0.21832363,0.04548377,0.0002299496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043819126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09741945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043819126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053650364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004066658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11614692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118239658","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2020.52","title":"REASON-GIVING AND THE DUTY TO OBEY: PERSPECTIVES FROM CLASSICAL ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Duty; Islam; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Virtue; Meaning (existential); Sharia; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.009431553668676443,"score_gpt":0.2907095307392636,"score_spread":0.28127797707058716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118239658","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10178416,0.02508042,0.032259434,0.12405249,0.0008781716,0.000054356173,0.00007816563,0.000038841346,0.71577394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99041873,0.0019488637,0.0018965541,0.0023790775,0.0004325537,0.000018149467,0.000009427167,0.000008232919,0.002888365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99307853,0.0049648755,0.00017201174,0.0003364499,0.0010430384,0.00040505058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906591,0.0069737732,0.0005608805,0.00049113267,0.00085786276,0.0004573366],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00976553,0.00033503058,0.00053921615,0.001986231,0.005046932,0.008190601,0.0015864107,0.005505887,0.0023772074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006009993,0.00030830104,0.00044996393,0.0016018266,0.061502475,0.006739315,0.0035103206,0.0065351157,0.00027432962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027038323,0.0000055175005,0.000026581194,0.0000087236995,0.0000010698193,0.000023840661,0.0024779353,0.00010853865,0.000009802745,0.9965712,0.00026875772,0.0004954027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006806576,0.0000065000045,0.00010921589,0.000055928984,0.000001812735,0.00003197584,0.0017928836,0.0005691258,0.000019450785,0.9888747,0.008525363,0.0000063609596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004145706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027262035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00976553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069646495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002608198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051645696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122798071","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2019.12","title":"VARIETIES OF BURDEN IN RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATIONS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Expansive; Ratification; Burden of proof; Coercion (linguistics); Law; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.01171257262975332,"score_gpt":0.28994878158245513,"score_spread":0.2782362089527018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122798071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20907952,0.0012012362,0.047473524,0.0129333455,0.00035797452,0.00018190085,0.0001700574,0.00008346251,0.72851896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930514,0.00014970622,0.0019328413,0.0005341059,0.000081937236,0.000051461462,0.000031779255,0.000015363343,0.0041513974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867034,0.0053197257,0.00089578767,0.0009980501,0.004423097,0.0016598125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987071,0.0055137016,0.001367755,0.0023081133,0.0030023938,0.00073694874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008730598,0.0003632213,0.0006762349,0.0038946634,0.006165371,0.0093220575,0.0018281683,0.0037500726,0.0065417495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024006175,0.00044901425,0.0008454408,0.0018982891,0.03460442,0.009735617,0.010132061,0.0047132615,0.0005743242],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008506922,0.000007717504,0.00037050646,0.000010491682,0.0000032879345,0.000055335044,0.0014130702,0.00008709975,0.000087391956,0.99637395,0.00020603192,0.0013765992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024137706,0.000036847963,0.0025330512,0.00019206533,0.000023075674,0.00022490976,0.0038767403,0.0010013764,0.00034754767,0.9746943,0.017015066,0.000030887233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006409212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004855643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0093220575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005158042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003505307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04617238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124715716","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.18","title":"ALEVIS UNDER LAW: THE POLITICS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN TURKEY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Turkey's Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; State (computer science); Human rights; Politics; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Turkish; International law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.012759936637373546,"score_gpt":0.282625891764569,"score_spread":0.2698659551271954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124715716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8219001,0.0018575346,0.00052773213,0.008342441,0.00017616412,0.000033605036,0.00002347603,0.000022279863,0.16711657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962579,0.0001397368,0.000094973504,0.0005230704,0.000013721301,0.0000049031114,0.0000062717245,0.000003760289,0.002955624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973923,0.000999353,0.00010878648,0.0002755987,0.00039657534,0.0008274315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987771,0.0005250874,0.00026847422,0.00010447685,0.00016213047,0.00016267659],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003662419,0.00040609975,0.00032769865,0.0008125075,0.011192017,0.0077473833,0.0011811649,0.0038109606,0.002534916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023522726,0.00027568647,0.00032400526,0.00084083923,0.017064175,0.0023525178,0.0049567693,0.0034889274,0.00030901877],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016942604,0.00016122217,0.013055329,0.00019238109,0.000026963698,0.0083043715,0.15349859,0.0009993988,0.0023014059,0.7840247,0.0064427126,0.030823529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116365874,0.00034866674,0.05328261,0.0007708906,0.00007263077,0.002947456,0.4952068,0.0020792023,0.0027712958,0.07118396,0.3710346,0.00018551647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022423375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02779362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022423375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01338213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055938466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097094595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213823941","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2021.71","title":"Raising Indigenous Religious Freedom to a Higher Standard: Michael McNally's <i>Defend the Sacred</i> and the Canadian Legal and Legislative Landscapes - Defend the Sacred: Native American Religious Freedom beyond the First Amendment By Michael D. McNally. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. 400. $99.95 (cloth); $26.95 (paper); $26.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780691190891.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislature; Raising (metalworking); Religious freedom; Law; Freedom of religion; Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Economic freedom; Engineering; Human rights","score_opus":0.007495507239234957,"score_gpt":0.23115317140750125,"score_spread":0.2236576641682663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213823941","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003081461,0.48693374,0.00050376053,0.40204775,0.0066413535,0.000021140411,0.00016811816,0.00003978184,0.10056285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16781807,0.35085833,0.0027076697,0.038942594,0.004676302,0.00004053135,0.00024867954,0.000104386934,0.43460336],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995585,0.00011917483,0.000008873006,0.000043202832,0.00019814918,0.00007208919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994623,0.00013459241,0.000027216469,0.000028731245,0.0001361722,0.00021102228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012121877,0.00041143116,0.00019584193,0.00076833507,0.004368564,0.0042656735,0.0009527725,0.0015996753,0.012654656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001580864,0.00024828952,0.00015821867,0.0013780646,0.0055972347,0.0052555376,0.001562243,0.0027957377,0.001589489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000110565625,0.000017152852,0.0003679972,0.00015020679,0.000004030621,0.000060953174,0.0058046286,0.000052684012,0.00016868582,0.07378023,0.8481265,0.071455866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024849976,0.000003047053,0.0015468135,0.00030221764,0.0000031002867,0.00004779133,0.0049146707,0.0000379326,0.00007022339,0.010957431,0.9821046,0.000009738516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5064447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7833145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4935553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011438476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014957348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210931790","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2021.79","title":"A Theory of a State? How Civil Law Ended Legal Pluralism in Modern Egypt","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Exeter","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Law; Lawmaking; Sharia; Sovereignty; Jurisprudence; Legal formalism; Political science; State (computer science); Islam; Comparative law; Legal research; Legal realism; Legal culture; Sociology; Philosophy; Private law; Black letter law; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.014031135468153369,"score_gpt":0.2516528177421173,"score_spread":0.2376216822739639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210931790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28073812,0.0045358324,0.012262988,0.041682348,0.00013118451,0.000081455255,0.00007423775,0.00005391648,0.6604399],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912225,0.0002819123,0.0007422737,0.00037104377,0.000025460991,0.000014291953,0.0000092639775,0.000008598426,0.0073246756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983109,0.00084238616,0.000085455045,0.00022896015,0.00022109914,0.00031116317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840456,0.00069255655,0.00022032463,0.00023565827,0.00027545856,0.00017150227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034961384,0.00021399751,0.0002961513,0.0019110853,0.008836995,0.008233065,0.00097169785,0.002242198,0.004407675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003166375,0.00024614224,0.00034320165,0.001692902,0.055731878,0.007281777,0.004596213,0.0032950444,0.0002714254],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000028420434,0.000004866034,0.00013898198,0.000007274374,0.0000012543313,0.000046517318,0.011735327,0.00011407939,0.000022418728,0.9861854,0.00023756876,0.0015034188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014397209,0.000013268859,0.0007941119,0.00008568209,0.000007012124,0.00007877093,0.029120896,0.00097557204,0.00016504286,0.91219,0.056539834,0.00001542215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023813099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027632259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023813099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019919148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065734354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14452422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244537214","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2013.14","title":"JLR volume 29 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Heidelberg; Macalester College; Pepperdine University; Fordham University; St Mary's University; Boston College; Georgetown University; University of Pennsylvania; Valparaiso University; Carleton College; Yale University; University of Toronto; Emory University","keywords":"Front cover; Volume (thermodynamics); Cover (algebra); Front (military); Computer science; Action (physics); Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.012862485644538929,"score_gpt":0.19156053731994405,"score_spread":0.17869805167540512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244537214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000988929,0.0028202755,0.0005598906,0.01144895,0.017508468,0.000103414786,0.002364024,0.002363102,0.9618429],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027734595,0.0009780357,0.00028227814,0.002404606,0.00399306,0.000022947177,0.00091113977,0.0004608701,0.98817366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871004,0.00009765093,0.000054553137,0.00019503095,0.0008000372,0.00014275985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973279,0.00032287638,0.00011084437,0.00035544895,0.0010902254,0.0007927033],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013726491,0.0007816215,0.00078248675,0.0024519886,0.0014430796,0.0067330017,0.0010438488,0.0028516336,0.80039644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034335763,0.00033575465,0.000745367,0.0010892749,0.00074976723,0.0016232004,0.0023186114,0.0023229579,0.7779635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023190905,0.00005222813,0.00016617421,0.000102477665,0.000003959679,0.00006513547,0.000018151475,0.00002824704,0.00039406325,0.0015156047,0.9593555,0.038275264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008314381,0.000015615178,0.0006054645,0.00009782223,0.0000025760928,0.000073557625,0.00002980722,0.00004614229,0.00020055134,0.00041615125,0.9984994,0.0000047129497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002061206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003841334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19960356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017942932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00201281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28471017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280633424","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.20","title":"Faith or Fraud: Fortune-Telling, Spirituality, and the Law. By Jeremy Patrick. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2020. Pp. 280. $89.95 (cloth); $32.95 (paper); $32.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780774863322.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Spirituality; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Religious studies; Law and economics; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.013178229272398919,"score_gpt":0.1941930232163944,"score_spread":0.18101479394399547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280633424","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003434395,0.9078009,0.00024184021,0.037265647,0.0048454935,0.00002132514,0.00022014552,0.00008659899,0.0491745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00772194,0.5403206,0.00081790576,0.009152565,0.0024307456,0.000043004464,0.00029625098,0.00014853521,0.4390684],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922264,0.00017650407,0.000046966255,0.000077854114,0.00037128766,0.000104797036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844104,0.00051562424,0.00016155372,0.00006528779,0.00038080636,0.00043584572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010582191,0.0016595062,0.00096352765,0.001887944,0.002035858,0.005489457,0.0011345866,0.00336639,0.08642466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026944652,0.000953608,0.00037907326,0.0045585646,0.0026213476,0.0053947335,0.0023026601,0.0046196515,0.043237913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001428962,0.0000074644217,0.000090282774,0.00032251066,0.0000037874124,0.000039732666,0.00038245384,0.000032328437,0.00007401542,0.0016176703,0.93654716,0.060868196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038030132,0.0000060480297,0.0007537421,0.0010309712,0.0000037421469,0.00017540663,0.001173875,0.000024834997,0.000034926165,0.001632982,0.99514955,0.000010062438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08831388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25413704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08831388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045355437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061802072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2891193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281650871","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.16","title":"Saffron Suffrage: Buddhist Monks and Constitutional Politics in Cambodia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives; National University of Singapore; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Buddhism; Constitution; Politics; Secular state; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Suffrage; Secularism; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011805301933866816,"score_gpt":0.2651618502207718,"score_spread":0.253356548286905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281650871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9365538,0.0020641836,0.00028289587,0.006129862,0.000056149795,0.000028618266,0.00003981457,0.0000057791112,0.05483897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980451,0.00018426927,0.000042586697,0.00023966638,0.000006464035,0.00000573507,0.0000072639955,0.0000018120337,0.0014671318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891627,0.0005837146,0.000025224539,0.00011226435,0.000054609383,0.00030792438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984628,0.0011033855,0.00016562268,0.00009478277,0.000053222295,0.00012033483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024638355,0.00016381017,0.00022003223,0.0008644661,0.00958869,0.0043327175,0.0005073427,0.0013855215,0.004900208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022664238,0.00020897592,0.000075914315,0.0012153799,0.01893391,0.0022701384,0.0030340669,0.0023160197,0.00012777428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006024472,0.00002307143,0.011431867,0.00017926774,0.000009181725,0.0015682656,0.78418756,0.00008901334,0.0014412709,0.18626866,0.0016931932,0.0130484635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001241182,0.000044488213,0.041312836,0.00050287,0.00000915308,0.00026042358,0.85311514,0.00020817955,0.00067214126,0.0090785,0.09475856,0.000025292791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041235656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10096381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041235656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007948241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003218596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.081991255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283806312","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.18","title":"Neutralizing Secularism: Religious Antiliberalism and the Twentieth-Century Global Ecumenical Project","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Human rights; Prerogative; Alliance; Christianity; Law; Political science; Secular state; Religious studies; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013157640206324298,"score_gpt":0.30245978308576965,"score_spread":0.28930214287944533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283806312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47174233,0.016116008,0.0021181384,0.07662102,0.0007976796,0.000023321576,0.000022707258,0.000032016596,0.4325268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98722714,0.0010518001,0.0002833562,0.0031755643,0.000121512996,0.000010814823,0.0000045102665,0.000007782526,0.008117467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883455,0.00065035967,0.000025673015,0.0000940826,0.00010463153,0.0002906753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989287,0.00055011804,0.00015899113,0.000119177465,0.00011904502,0.00012387297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029748501,0.00021369001,0.00017171017,0.00087960623,0.0045413366,0.0054590567,0.0004348261,0.0018431444,0.003659478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002206976,0.00009044911,0.00010142449,0.00065113074,0.023551995,0.0031026143,0.0045044203,0.0027382139,0.0001506092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014599387,0.000023897654,0.0011314234,0.000027332637,0.0000038403987,0.00019906805,0.03494263,0.00006427616,0.00021882933,0.94822145,0.0027717191,0.012381032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003780375,0.00012193463,0.0075992546,0.0005483264,0.000013857311,0.0002735094,0.082698576,0.0003716529,0.001267676,0.26931238,0.6377265,0.000028632077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029232968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006821503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0054590567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003385829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015623382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024565995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318066208","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.57","title":"The Limits of Defining Identity in Religion-Gender Conflicts: A Response to Patrick Parkinson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Identity (music); Sincerity; Faith; Transgender; Government (linguistics); Gender identity; Belief system; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03900396709018261,"score_gpt":0.3529645084555882,"score_spread":0.3139605413654056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318066208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016536443,0.0023587027,0.00037698503,0.99066925,0.0014614606,0.0000054473553,0.000007213696,0.0000064308065,0.003460828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1265601,0.004681565,0.0015197801,0.85524714,0.006356356,0.00007335518,0.000011953043,0.000060559687,0.0054892185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97214407,0.017660253,0.00097126636,0.0031937857,0.0044013085,0.0016293215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9093332,0.077926636,0.0017134357,0.0014677641,0.005719509,0.0038394865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03348812,0.00074544305,0.001660608,0.0011939621,0.017109502,0.013830148,0.0043743527,0.04281002,0.0028368563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05928052,0.00088982855,0.0008356045,0.0015935025,0.06289044,0.022624847,0.012325513,0.06796897,0.000532876],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064443964,0.000054613603,0.0005759733,0.00012116812,0.000015353728,0.0008581916,0.033928216,0.0002666792,0.00019965667,0.59970343,0.34962815,0.014584137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009049062,0.00006544441,0.0007954712,0.0009778483,0.000020955984,0.0010043799,0.044839814,0.0008730408,0.00060623925,0.35925627,0.59127605,0.00019401508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0256573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020357344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04281002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011545621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012215611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17710423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376587561","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.8","title":"The Laws of Hammurabi: At the Confluence of Royal and Scribal Traditions. By Pamela Barmash. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Pp. 336. $99.00 (cloth); $97.99 (digital). ISBN: 9780197525401.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Confluence; History; Art; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.028174152127406607,"score_gpt":0.2213194287273582,"score_spread":0.19314527659995157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376587561","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009702227,0.72000384,0.0009426325,0.12981857,0.006444612,0.000031173528,0.0001969311,0.00008314962,0.1327768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34682387,0.32561696,0.00492725,0.015110126,0.00362954,0.00012727447,0.0002619157,0.00026081924,0.30324224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990715,0.00041501125,0.000058558206,0.00007363402,0.00022300024,0.00015832715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991272,0.00040878932,0.00013475455,0.000052762385,0.00017038111,0.000106094136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017978777,0.0005663478,0.00041333126,0.0014212623,0.0049186912,0.0040396866,0.0009436175,0.0024894823,0.01681074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004583718,0.00062235625,0.00020948364,0.0017367847,0.0071430192,0.004520114,0.002011676,0.0028805495,0.0039372956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007750391,0.00004506988,0.0007891712,0.00097129156,0.000021315995,0.00048972445,0.043751374,0.0001318723,0.000476535,0.27220833,0.47171977,0.20931801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007755863,0.000016435175,0.0030618033,0.0013892059,0.000010403425,0.00031454072,0.009841813,0.000078949575,0.00020695811,0.026486102,0.95856637,0.00001964472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027680997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07643495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027680997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034719573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053530447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05623752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384131537","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.17","title":"The Changing Terrain of Religious Freedom. Edited by Heather J. Sharkey and Jeffrey Edward Green. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021. Pp. 288. $55.00 (cloth); $55.00 (paper); $55.00 (digital). ISBN: 9780812253375.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrain; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography; Cartography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010252230612790191,"score_gpt":0.24097210359622298,"score_spread":0.2307198729834328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384131537","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016428878,0.89189315,0.0005058315,0.034131832,0.0040323986,0.000013041125,0.00038791826,0.000050261024,0.06734269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07175944,0.76974297,0.0031106132,0.00798351,0.0038552606,0.00006398705,0.0005906944,0.00015334201,0.14274025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996816,0.00013762029,0.000016927124,0.000034790482,0.00008979144,0.000039383176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952066,0.00018886286,0.00008567994,0.000036132973,0.00008140253,0.0000873575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058742124,0.00090704655,0.0005497589,0.0011701165,0.0013382299,0.0027856908,0.0006046284,0.0012336241,0.021447686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014634479,0.00074043963,0.0003612429,0.0017177665,0.003037415,0.0030901737,0.0016631166,0.0024972267,0.006055489],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027372924,0.000019584573,0.0005005171,0.0005535046,0.00001365553,0.00010409182,0.0021193107,0.00015099163,0.00020207517,0.03660564,0.8120756,0.14762767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008179304,0.000009596404,0.0033144879,0.0014334436,0.0000071350755,0.00028992802,0.0020137203,0.00006410755,0.00007987382,0.032165654,0.9606008,0.000013117594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01335934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040690787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021447686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022138571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025926298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07174969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389396958","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.37","title":"Religious Freedom and Sacred Lands","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Framing (construction); Sovereignty; Injustice; Law; Adjudication; Self-determination; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.013076662621205838,"score_gpt":0.29839421962862955,"score_spread":0.2853175570074237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389396958","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13261667,0.0024243614,0.00088459626,0.02354342,0.00011991053,0.00003505489,0.000084422805,0.000019195073,0.84027237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697085,0.00035417388,0.00014220984,0.0016766309,0.000023229424,0.000008561143,0.000014906001,0.0000036069564,0.028068218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990121,0.00021806426,0.00002594522,0.00006655723,0.00024974332,0.00042755945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987827,0.0003944498,0.000119670694,0.000111336834,0.00026478895,0.00032711108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008064336,0.000097587734,0.00018142727,0.00080502743,0.008992284,0.0068829954,0.0006281162,0.0019316383,0.0060533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018608032,0.00013441785,0.000116176394,0.0006839999,0.025722438,0.0011096802,0.0033690645,0.0037040205,0.00020924248],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007998905,0.000013032605,0.001738987,0.000017102257,0.0000037706866,0.00024452698,0.0053689415,0.00013946448,0.0002046315,0.9844535,0.0029940067,0.004814095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006688214,0.000045704182,0.02981314,0.00097123755,0.00003637772,0.0005101323,0.042441845,0.0008163981,0.0010515151,0.4871751,0.43697068,0.00010093624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5845182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81264037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5845182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013290136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014735133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83585733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396241044","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.45","title":"Moses Mendelssohn and the Jewish Questions of Modern Natural Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Toleration; Judaism; Natural law; Enlightenment; Haskalah; Natural (archaeology); Law; Modernity; Philosophy; Religious studies; Classics; History; Theology; Political science; Jewish studies","score_opus":0.0227630601117135,"score_gpt":0.25606759601170487,"score_spread":0.23330453589999137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396241044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26657048,0.039884858,0.0041511664,0.19100648,0.0013355222,0.000013766157,0.0000691873,0.000046778718,0.49692184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804433,0.0025527615,0.00062039465,0.0038706022,0.000564543,0.0000073052756,0.0000075771263,0.0000064134865,0.011927219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922967,0.00044174815,0.000017510092,0.00006789503,0.00014701232,0.00009623004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990441,0.00056001195,0.000110051515,0.00007106056,0.00014808262,0.00006665376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023248862,0.00014324034,0.00016582267,0.00095177314,0.0036402938,0.0023711617,0.00037953196,0.0017659048,0.0022133254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018627394,0.00010695608,0.00013770032,0.0005128747,0.01776886,0.002294521,0.0011692423,0.0016365501,0.00017573434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009387896,0.000012716198,0.00027111298,0.00000906103,0.0000020856733,0.000064182845,0.0024686803,0.000072964336,0.00006645025,0.9910233,0.0031574601,0.0028425707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019958377,0.000026558651,0.0022073758,0.00014991786,0.000004849428,0.00014664681,0.0036789177,0.0003995513,0.00024752517,0.8377005,0.15540248,0.000015766844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007847446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012156952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007847446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045109293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015166056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03272921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403303691","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2024.15","title":"Leaving Iberia: Islamic Law and Christian Conquest in North West Africa. By Jocelyn Hendrickson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pp. 432. $50.00 (cloth). ISBN: 9780674248205.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"CONQUEST; Islam; History; Ancient history; Sharia; Theology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.008621365003364995,"score_gpt":0.21958697848370407,"score_spread":0.21096561348033907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403303691","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034067964,0.9692496,0.000034582536,0.01505843,0.0016117502,0.000006240943,0.000043793112,0.0000064564174,0.010582291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10847376,0.821356,0.00034054252,0.003021539,0.002588928,0.00003524672,0.00012768262,0.000027401686,0.06402893],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999782,0.00009903897,0.000011233556,0.000024224228,0.000029033055,0.00005440781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997526,0.000081988204,0.000063832274,0.000009761419,0.000028163404,0.00006360937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009217185,0.0014512403,0.000589254,0.001798179,0.002662172,0.0034132348,0.0007563478,0.0019399186,0.0111777885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010564373,0.0004864645,0.00022601052,0.0028457227,0.0033713966,0.005556832,0.001845171,0.0020749578,0.0014674768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026340922,0.0001303844,0.0036092817,0.0025527102,0.00005406343,0.0014051454,0.046362154,0.00047654376,0.0007726645,0.054275278,0.4735845,0.4165139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020741982,0.000036406716,0.023079889,0.005847321,0.00002503431,0.00075044075,0.039342515,0.00016082679,0.0002729132,0.013533337,0.9169004,0.00003014299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043443054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1009595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043443054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044573336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029877496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08638036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}