{"meta":{"query_hash":"89b07d0daab9","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law and Religion"},"cohort_total":24,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":24,"exported":24,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/89b07d0daab9","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Law+and+Religion"},"results":[{"id":"W1586824842","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400000692","title":"Religion in the Abortion Discourse in Singapore: A Case Study of the Relevance of Religious Arguments in Law-Making in Multi-Religious Democracies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Socioeconomic Development in Asia","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Torture; Human rights; Appeal; Law; Autonomy; Population; Political science; Birth control; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Family planning","score_opus":0.021157216881091043,"score_gpt":0.3464194949883225,"score_spread":0.3252622781072314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586824842","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962116,0.00063095125,0.0000037400703,0.0012794761,0.000491568,0.0005202789,7.930893e-7,0.0000036457864,0.0008579792],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706525,0.0023930308,0.0002426577,0.00022548357,0.00004549412,0.000009100523,2.2496987e-7,0.000010573389,0.000008210129],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974315,0.00048671046,0.001203517,0.00018733481,0.00042868045,0.0002622285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983167,0.00038807097,0.0009609023,0.00020696138,0.000090085574,0.000037254995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031367198,0.00014357592,0.00038152494,0.00023097481,0.00014509683,0.000041266656,0.00035690283,0.00016979424,6.815665e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032644422,0.00009590473,0.00007289015,0.0004504539,0.00046072944,0.00027511053,0.000061282735,0.00070786354,3.9120388e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022088693,0.0015329263,0.66359717,0.000048104073,0.0000251849,0.0011305123,0.3203632,0.00048564418,0.0011541793,0.009983017,0.00027583397,0.0011833739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.023472022,0.0015197487,0.40311056,0.0057657408,0.00020696863,0.0027178074,0.43009844,0.00051640003,0.0014295378,0.124406904,0.0052765436,0.0014792932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022533074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1887308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26048657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017895833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98397595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1964385228","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.17","title":"THE VIRTUES OF LAW IN THE POLITICS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Agnosticism; Politics; Virtue; Law; Normative; Sociology; Religious freedom; Political science; Ambiguity; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011678544665698504,"score_gpt":0.2851194748262653,"score_spread":0.2734409301605668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1964385228","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25215372,0.004916437,0.00023205692,0.011429791,0.0005503067,0.00011749069,0.000008117762,0.000004635583,0.7305874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99585325,0.0027594299,0.00012329278,0.00085895293,0.00030798552,2.7077974e-7,1.77071e-7,0.0000021588885,0.00009447102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989541,0.00022678953,0.0003372046,0.000037401885,0.00031528427,0.00012922645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99868953,0.00072073785,0.00029689656,0.00008317216,0.00016174254,0.00004792932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001082994,0.000047247035,0.00014788641,0.000021925476,0.0002816893,0.00002141322,0.00019929552,0.000050066144,7.8018985e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013971013,0.000024439076,0.00007031144,0.000060594153,0.0018967907,0.000055984343,0.00001438719,0.00012743176,3.8498055e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011433851,0.000019222281,0.00029467567,0.000005235985,0.000007777472,0.0000016574284,0.0013834197,0.000013951167,0.000037291287,0.99727845,0.0008725696,0.00007430097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019896345,0.00019381409,0.0001849986,0.00006818432,0.000025633195,0.000024091853,0.0009639099,0.000005314831,0.00010453636,0.17705145,0.8211351,0.00004400981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010328419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011091171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8202625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017002558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019613047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9962619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2114692900","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.35","title":"CHRISTIAN PRACTICE AS THE FOUNDATION FOR MODERN POLITICAL THEOLOGY","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Religion and Society Interactions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Orthodoxy; Politics; Archbishop; Sovereignty; Political theology; State (computer science); Dominion; Theology; Philosophy; Catholic theology; Religious studies; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04127867305509867,"score_gpt":0.3990068253821988,"score_spread":0.3577281523271001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2114692900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034611247,0.0014339287,0.013553864,0.41911325,0.0022920696,0.00030316907,0.0000010329356,0.000021514452,0.52866995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98876023,0.00089688465,0.00049513817,0.008716919,0.0006799078,0.0000021012174,5.989704e-7,0.0000036912875,0.00044455088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926066,0.00017115593,0.00018163085,0.000049411225,0.00020428673,0.00013284346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986515,0.00051359204,0.00017076568,0.000048261045,0.00046909106,0.00014681261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010604254,0.000039982548,0.000083271974,0.00001701694,0.00037367677,0.00008684091,0.00008325202,0.000077650235,0.0000045503375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009935558,0.000024352967,0.00007712102,0.00003661547,0.0002315759,0.00024755063,0.000009456321,0.00014367701,0.000008100605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007068917,0.000025470967,0.000016703323,0.0000011565705,0.000018909537,0.0000019277174,0.008595422,0.0000053960657,0.000017041159,0.9769293,0.014034289,0.00028370344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024513155,0.00015849069,0.000007925684,0.000008487476,0.00003532151,0.0001164182,0.0075593553,0.000073208794,0.00001326324,0.3191335,0.67261976,0.000029147372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024523444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014891561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95414895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006582952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020472106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37072274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2143711301","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.26","title":"COPTS AND THE MILLET PARTNERSHIP: THE INTRA-COMMUNAL DYNAMICS BEHIND EGYPTIAN SECTARIANISM","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sectarianism; Scholarship; Politics; Dynamics (music); Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.009595350778706059,"score_gpt":0.2508278721558864,"score_spread":0.24123252137718038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2143711301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25990635,0.014106788,0.0003268072,0.12006621,0.0020199919,0.00027623022,0.0000020406137,0.000015227038,0.60328037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99089473,0.006097637,0.000046991754,0.0018905095,0.0005199767,6.5715005e-7,2.0899009e-7,0.000003901386,0.0005453685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991593,0.0002854146,0.00017850431,0.00005195053,0.00019876304,0.00012608164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933416,0.00031539297,0.00017159506,0.00007436931,0.00006249233,0.000041971925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016443237,0.000059867063,0.00014809237,0.000016177239,0.0012364503,0.0000679093,0.0001456691,0.000060671147,0.0000046301457],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064100386,0.000028784374,0.00005910989,0.000025628617,0.0010152352,0.000052151732,0.000031606876,0.0002486077,9.717716e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067855784,0.000008650022,0.00010841096,0.000004153808,0.000031315478,0.0000024769722,0.02935614,0.0000018523183,0.0000035121257,0.96018815,0.008496454,0.0017310508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011577015,0.00012413708,0.0006534251,0.000044917913,0.000082121274,0.00005135822,0.0050748833,0.00016240928,0.0000027001577,0.053730976,0.9388299,0.000085476735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021046198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008949572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93033344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040594143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003298952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253394476","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400003921","title":"On the Pope, Cartoons, and Apostates: Shari‘a 2006","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Historical and Linguistic Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Apostasy; Islam; Sharia; Law; Aside; Doctrine; Afghan; Legal doctrine; Political science; Perspective (graphical); History; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.01984051205346609,"score_gpt":0.29866378093598844,"score_spread":0.27882326888252235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253394476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28993174,0.012295324,0.00011401646,0.0138854515,0.001409199,0.00011144976,0.0000026565283,0.000012087975,0.6822381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940293,0.0031442696,0.000042354386,0.0011784051,0.00048004353,1.3877461e-7,5.0981228e-8,0.0000020637624,0.0011234072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995119,0.000031498013,0.00014007726,0.00004301154,0.000173771,0.00009975094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993273,0.00041155276,0.00008162412,0.000025851945,0.00008584953,0.000067813606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007664431,0.000038228067,0.00008410078,0.000019707628,0.0004699528,0.000023723174,0.000045198172,0.000033261244,0.000005809135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037624416,0.000019710022,0.000025228142,0.000048221496,0.00017792368,0.000021243402,0.000010634719,0.0001062292,0.0000019748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050091898,0.000025564837,0.0005311129,0.0000047021836,0.000016849252,0.000034916997,0.008544534,5.346215e-7,0.000023281495,0.9507398,0.038702816,0.0013257972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011929044,0.00012707178,0.00050500734,0.000040368872,0.000016497346,0.00000698674,0.00079004635,6.0677036e-7,0.000016218366,0.030760922,0.9675756,0.000041394804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013995842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033001692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92887276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024428553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017382385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36145446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2499919811","doi":"10.1017/s0748081400000813","title":"Reclaiming the Nation: Muslim Women and the Law in India. By Vrinda Narain. University of Toronto Press2008. Pp. 213. $52.00. ISBN: 0-802-09278-0.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Gender and Women's Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Sociology; Media studies; Engineering","score_opus":0.007348899907242034,"score_gpt":0.2289151877379707,"score_spread":0.22156628783072868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2499919811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93478984,0.0023822307,0.000006430484,0.0051610786,0.00035117555,0.00015403873,0.0000024835128,0.0000046567607,0.057148043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99316627,0.005810168,0.000024180768,0.0003117772,0.00014222715,3.9019676e-7,3.1157555e-7,0.0000032320474,0.00054146186],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990891,0.00020586404,0.00018447796,0.000085619235,0.0002777773,0.00015715341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993762,0.00016017369,0.0002119488,0.00008146195,0.0000864469,0.000083767496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014257579,0.00006779649,0.00015872679,0.0000136321005,0.0006355441,0.000049575174,0.00019542794,0.00010657288,0.00003041806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021841783,0.000037890106,0.00004233595,0.000056088706,0.00056935713,0.0002699632,0.000036562233,0.0002601545,3.950144e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037381574,0.000113755006,0.0009744427,0.00003235793,0.00009024128,0.000025577383,0.5551396,0.000004164812,0.0010110151,0.431285,0.008756758,0.0021933026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031917004,0.00020364547,0.0034731757,0.00007060179,0.000037803977,0.000045535628,0.0753858,0.000024875624,0.00019557173,0.04235818,0.87482256,0.00019055176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010059621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009698861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8660658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006294491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068051624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9965325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2575386710","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2016.36","title":"WHAT'S THE HARM IN POLYGAMY? MULTICULTURAL TOLERATION AND WOMEN'S EXPERIENCE OF PLURAL MARRIAGE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Marriage and Sexual Relationships","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Constitutionality; Charter; Political science; Constitution; Freedom of religion; Duty; Toleration; Substantive due process; Due Process Clause; Jurisdiction; Sociology; Human rights","score_opus":0.025441613290251394,"score_gpt":0.31444987974148836,"score_spread":0.28900826645123695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2575386710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99351066,0.00069073564,0.000018603394,0.0043018158,0.00027220612,0.000060358365,2.9111632e-7,0.0000017516567,0.0011435943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961706,0.0030903895,0.00003090828,0.00017547251,0.0001224171,0.000001621564,7.901198e-8,0.00000155636,0.00040694827],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993198,0.00012554748,0.00022562438,0.000051747495,0.00017962145,0.00009766164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994913,0.00019261609,0.000152343,0.000036763497,0.00006861682,0.00005839555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005442545,0.00004187213,0.00009534864,0.000028725342,0.0001606592,0.00008058924,0.00006137763,0.000050484163,0.000015221407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014936799,0.000019279898,0.000019174848,0.000055734723,0.00020889216,0.0007362762,0.000013351315,0.00007145229,3.9917933e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038144249,0.00010019919,0.010761125,0.000025775722,0.000031450585,0.000030118377,0.73364526,0.000008001993,0.055074055,0.1769699,0.00059989456,0.022372803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009952392,0.0019050832,0.08935066,0.0023055337,0.000097907956,0.0002228402,0.6131661,0.00024290838,0.015582473,0.07516103,0.19103017,0.0009828984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00030000907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004212049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19043028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003184814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024316927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12356769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587299222","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2015.37","title":"Biblical Narrative and the Formation of Rabbinic Law. By Jane L. Kanarek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. Pp. 212. $90.00 (cloth). ISBN: 9781107047815.","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"King's University College; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.019501957356236888,"score_gpt":0.22625743418962468,"score_spread":0.2067554768333878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587299222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3643694,0.119808145,0.0006573068,0.022944111,0.00143705,0.0007859057,0.00018102079,0.000045583907,0.48977152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975088,0.022325514,0.000017178965,0.0011730934,0.00024623834,7.625661e-7,0.000007512756,0.0000074969785,0.0011341947],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904877,0.0001275372,0.00036101215,0.00009408186,0.00024664588,0.000121939825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889505,0.000095165946,0.00039760297,0.00007536353,0.00043590352,0.000100902624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040809368,0.00011190374,0.00028972735,0.00007409029,0.00030554127,0.00010925892,0.00010083467,0.000064570835,0.0000080626505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026202984,0.00006707577,0.00008900405,0.000063154155,0.00062895694,0.000606514,0.000058252066,0.0002009133,0.0000018631447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004701255,0.00003220679,0.000007834926,0.000023459666,0.000047338523,0.000002107048,0.0048792665,0.0000016426463,0.000025026058,0.4474301,0.5469797,0.000101189326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022228977,0.000602313,0.00003751633,0.00008408753,0.00008856796,0.00004385556,0.0044093444,0.00038455904,0.000191566,0.0005735624,0.9912574,0.00010433017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003254549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017980751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6107186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035901776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021665135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49199262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796185122","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2018.10","title":"JUDGING RELIGION AND JUDGES' RELIGIONS","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Precept; Argument (complex analysis); Judicial opinion; Faith; Law; Political science; Religious freedom; Sociology; Epistemology; Economic freedom; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015936084388315463,"score_gpt":0.3056923283996676,"score_spread":0.28975624401135214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796185122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34093297,0.0033870132,0.00052566803,0.011328545,0.000788762,0.00008908919,0.0000031634208,0.000028011807,0.6429168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98701346,0.0077977683,0.0007611377,0.0027563858,0.001164042,3.529213e-7,4.4582012e-7,0.0000052910946,0.0005011343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913824,0.000080257145,0.00025493826,0.00009338516,0.0002438456,0.00018931253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999165,0.00012549457,0.00019123836,0.0000635577,0.00024791094,0.00020680556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046952293,0.00007473585,0.00015403824,0.0000659628,0.00069526065,0.00006432201,0.00007965609,0.000084039704,0.000007955466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010983236,0.00005974448,0.000051328025,0.000090375164,0.0014156607,0.00019032962,0.000028011831,0.00014352259,0.0000058904693],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019754023,0.000011220288,0.0010395466,0.0000040413875,0.0000111542595,0.000011629401,0.0006676529,4.5055117e-7,0.000106651256,0.9861467,0.011699896,0.000281304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021504067,0.00019664541,0.00023573959,0.00007577937,0.00003850889,0.00015965551,0.00021092077,0.000003177049,0.000071335744,0.029323021,0.9693751,0.00009512724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019161406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034002351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95767516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004125079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029175598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5347453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118239658","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2020.52","title":"REASON-GIVING AND THE DUTY TO OBEY: PERSPECTIVES FROM CLASSICAL ISLAMIC JURISPRUDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Revelation; Duty; Islam; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Virtue; Meaning (existential); Sharia; Epistemology; Philosophy; Political science; Theology","score_opus":0.009431553668676443,"score_gpt":0.2907095307392636,"score_spread":0.28127797707058716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118239658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7297181,0.013117317,0.0007586842,0.06997935,0.00046699194,0.00007907822,0.000010742121,0.0000099690415,0.18585975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920953,0.004584556,0.0006429281,0.0014369522,0.00061281543,3.7838882e-7,1.9437132e-7,0.0000022565753,0.0006246383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925625,0.00017735102,0.00014309837,0.00008517369,0.00022859225,0.000109558954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991482,0.00045664847,0.00008962151,0.000050832885,0.00016252705,0.00009219124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034300904,0.00004967077,0.00014128047,0.000013866044,0.00039598008,0.00008605201,0.000072589,0.00004233133,0.0000116423935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027868108,0.000031185675,0.000052889893,0.00006486377,0.0009658437,0.000099819634,0.00003551584,0.00015232367,0.0000015980825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031478514,0.00001182947,0.00030718336,0.0000013118413,0.00001581178,0.000023418053,0.0044930633,0.0000016927356,0.00010688529,0.99378806,0.0009798013,0.00023947173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058750296,0.00006394951,0.0024135197,0.00015128187,0.00006757437,0.0001245245,0.008853612,0.0000113857595,0.000088396235,0.08699442,0.9005226,0.00012123255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025030605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000968929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90679365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040228988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004097158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37838954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122798071","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2019.12","title":"VARIETIES OF BURDEN IN RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATIONS","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Expansive; Ratification; Burden of proof; Coercion (linguistics); Law; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Politics","score_opus":0.01171257262975332,"score_gpt":0.28994878158245513,"score_spread":0.2782362089527018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122798071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59335124,0.0011647957,0.00006013871,0.0029322838,0.00028049428,0.000058862297,0.0000024040955,0.0000034033828,0.40214637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99706715,0.0019993726,0.00020241967,0.00022144918,0.00012917338,1.8280039e-7,3.9276918e-7,0.0000017735363,0.00037808355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994316,0.000053786403,0.0002218002,0.000035676287,0.00017508073,0.00008203815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950916,0.00012343394,0.00016481995,0.000041869112,0.00011510691,0.000045605146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029079994,0.000033590164,0.00012745708,0.000051901425,0.000061147046,0.000012993424,0.00007326459,0.000047325266,0.000012580917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038960246,0.000027101163,0.00003885804,0.00007004104,0.0002992971,0.00010987872,0.000012122561,0.00009253566,0.0000026963223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013027536,0.00001202493,0.0026980292,0.000005927852,0.000006048455,0.0000026709185,0.0013588318,0.000055970646,0.000111612055,0.99514335,0.0005232708,0.000069243026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004581051,0.00017567826,0.00095404394,0.0001237626,0.000023222361,0.000032516877,0.0017904046,0.0000069072466,0.00009488588,0.077366106,0.9188782,0.00009616125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005305565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023474859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9183549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025578245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033393048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80204624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124715716","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2014.18","title":"ALEVIS UNDER LAW: THE POLITICS OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM IN TURKEY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Turkey's Politics and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; State (computer science); Human rights; Politics; Democracy; Argument (complex analysis); Turkish; International law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.012759936637373546,"score_gpt":0.282625891764569,"score_spread":0.2698659551271954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124715716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8521614,0.0029675306,0.00013641236,0.0132847335,0.00070820126,0.000108727545,0.0000036841768,0.000008576488,0.13062075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99444336,0.003194557,0.0001378682,0.0014952329,0.00050339085,2.9137425e-7,2.2982671e-7,0.0000058984447,0.00021920358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889576,0.00017396014,0.00034734022,0.00006419686,0.00031247517,0.00020627666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991655,0.0002588455,0.00022943637,0.000098652505,0.00014291413,0.0001046971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010285546,0.00006722391,0.00019361654,0.00002790025,0.00024018198,0.00004549683,0.00016593057,0.000119343305,0.0000025198838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000071401184,0.000042010284,0.00011520911,0.00007336889,0.0005416904,0.00007705801,0.000025118066,0.00021598721,9.50914e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046760947,0.000024100234,0.00033425586,0.000008534615,0.000011372144,0.0000020023451,0.005551541,0.00010799097,0.00005417312,0.9907825,0.0030912042,0.000027635579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079997856,0.00020728407,0.0011654668,0.0001632242,0.000054681208,0.000028300692,0.0032716359,0.00015775631,0.00017478067,0.5553065,0.43852392,0.0001464695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019858621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010718593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.435476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047490026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008054002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9866682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3213823941","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2021.71","title":"Raising Indigenous Religious Freedom to a Higher Standard: Michael McNally's <i>Defend the Sacred</i> and the Canadian Legal and Legislative Landscapes - Defend the Sacred: Native American Religious Freedom beyond the First Amendment By Michael D. McNally. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. 400. $99.95 (cloth); $26.95 (paper); $26.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780691190891.","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legislature; Raising (metalworking); Religious freedom; Law; Freedom of religion; Political science; Sociology; Religious studies; Philosophy; Economic freedom; Engineering; Human rights","score_opus":0.007495507239234957,"score_gpt":0.23115317140750125,"score_spread":0.2236576641682663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3213823941","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27919084,0.37315205,0.0003756287,0.17899747,0.0019791275,0.0034202472,0.0019690318,0.00016435552,0.16075125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84510976,0.14632645,0.00021419652,0.0066251196,0.0008191469,0.000009135724,0.000011284739,0.000047722613,0.00083716825],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99626076,0.0006085073,0.0006613176,0.0005236561,0.0011202025,0.00082557095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635464,0.0012231917,0.0008125806,0.00040337886,0.0006335755,0.0005726056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012612758,0.0004630554,0.00070439663,0.00004404708,0.004280759,0.0009927211,0.00074465835,0.00018828588,0.00000670609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001709602,0.00025845238,0.0002360071,0.00049724785,0.0052741184,0.0004921775,0.0003118841,0.0009314962,0.0000024363442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001481584,0.00012460675,0.0011110923,0.00003722906,0.0010018275,0.00049126864,0.039924305,0.00039759808,0.000106886306,0.5775161,0.37690145,0.00090610195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013953755,0.0003449538,0.00012731199,0.0001282472,0.00028487103,0.0003911527,0.005632365,0.000018255143,0.000033482098,0.0022803692,0.98899263,0.0003709706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24279776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27103215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6120912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052877836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024161618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210931790","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2021.79","title":"A Theory of a State? How Civil Law Ended Legal Pluralism in Modern Egypt","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; University of Exeter","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Law; Lawmaking; Sharia; Sovereignty; Jurisprudence; Legal formalism; Political science; State (computer science); Islam; Comparative law; Legal research; Legal realism; Legal culture; Sociology; Philosophy; Private law; Black letter law; Theology; Politics","score_opus":0.014031135468153369,"score_gpt":0.2516528177421173,"score_spread":0.2376216822739639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210931790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70227814,0.011437911,0.00006725507,0.009110615,0.0011848356,0.00014876644,0.000009855028,0.000010139429,0.27575248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962479,0.0016344183,0.000024832749,0.00047107975,0.00009558493,0.0000013865406,2.0048923e-7,0.000004006318,0.0015206153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990916,0.00021034712,0.00019300586,0.00006240357,0.00031526142,0.00012735317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995855,0.00006874701,0.00021291073,0.000043068536,0.000057579484,0.000032196338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008977272,0.000050098064,0.00017853222,0.000057609308,0.0003665065,0.000016973101,0.00010056281,0.000027557991,0.00001138963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016812091,0.000040919873,0.00007168836,0.000068751186,0.00025499932,0.00010974139,0.00004654405,0.00019742016,1.2231106e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013681673,0.00005140491,0.000051007715,0.000008449758,0.000023727927,0.00005700331,0.044418223,0.00004146717,0.00036033496,0.9499438,0.004056412,0.00085135555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001074012,0.00031938296,0.00017755752,0.000051712363,0.000028971333,0.00003983554,0.012552977,0.000021126967,0.000055896628,0.1824391,0.80311424,0.00012517364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036581687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073087467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79905784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011273738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008859006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55300814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244537214","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2013.14","title":"JLR volume 29 issue 1 Cover and Front matter","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Diverse Scientific and Economic Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Heidelberg; Macalester College; Pepperdine University; Fordham University; St Mary's University; Boston College; Georgetown University; University of Pennsylvania; Valparaiso University; Carleton College; Yale University; University of Toronto; Emory University","keywords":"Front cover; Volume (thermodynamics); Cover (algebra); Front (military); Computer science; Action (physics); Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.012862485644538929,"score_gpt":0.19156053731994405,"score_spread":0.17869805167540512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244537214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11927947,0.0054443707,0.0005199636,0.001997888,0.0023559837,0.00004960293,0.000022613713,0.0000046060236,0.8703255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80650616,0.0027833898,0.0004011479,0.0024148247,0.00040628968,6.1081874e-7,7.0477216e-7,0.000009522871,0.18747734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942374,0.0000056047493,0.00032599719,0.00012279804,0.000019085133,0.00010274404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995705,0.000016224238,0.00026117815,0.00007132069,0.000020084834,0.000060684495],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003924472,0.000064757456,0.00024997952,0.0000639991,0.00008153428,0.00007415285,0.00005505088,0.00004286755,0.0018721528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012770822,0.000056002562,0.00005065805,0.000014806664,0.00008265739,0.00017250715,0.00003930936,0.00006773825,0.006311023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024279752,0.000023265555,0.024062874,0.000023058166,0.000058208298,0.000002818988,0.0005212897,0.00001667256,0.0000078870835,0.047289215,0.92768717,0.0002832506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003764715,0.00005884261,0.004555912,0.0000154357,0.000008241609,0.000024099969,0.000034103832,0.0002058622,0.000008113812,0.0069523384,0.987682,0.00007862321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008800754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000016773023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6872267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001604478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000024431663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99904025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280633424","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.20","title":"Faith or Fraud: Fortune-Telling, Spirituality, and the Law. By Jeremy Patrick. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 2020. Pp. 280. $89.95 (cloth); $32.95 (paper); $32.95 (digital). ISBN: 9780774863322.","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"History of Science and Medicine","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Faith; Law; Spirituality; Political science; Sociology; Theology; Religious studies; Law and economics; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.013178229272398919,"score_gpt":0.1941930232163944,"score_spread":0.18101479394399547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280633424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5520787,0.26163042,0.0000645753,0.004867924,0.004582191,0.0012650227,0.001025268,0.00009606742,0.1743898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81742644,0.14357418,0.00006627352,0.0036539787,0.0008964309,0.000002145254,0.000017630327,0.000033717104,0.034329224],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983428,0.0000883947,0.00048014984,0.00023041002,0.00061767147,0.00024054201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99883884,0.000107785396,0.0005257411,0.00015497823,0.00019265353,0.00018002921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000641991,0.00013787564,0.00046929184,0.000014196465,0.0011429114,0.00024633386,0.0003136054,0.00006464091,0.00051724154],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020771537,0.00012097328,0.00015147372,0.000059484144,0.0014225327,0.00068772375,0.00013981696,0.00039863883,0.0000014792752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030676957,0.00014150153,0.00013680516,0.000075473654,0.00006181832,0.00013701554,0.004310752,0.0000057604216,0.000041428746,0.0050574658,0.9881778,0.0015474544],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023341074,0.000717105,0.000022861828,0.0001278584,0.0001338892,0.00020972358,0.0057615973,0.000042145257,0.00000400196,0.0020789327,0.98839927,0.00016853694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038654707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052263528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2653477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005400475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009502147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.967747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281650871","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.16","title":"Saffron Suffrage: Buddhist Monks and Constitutional Politics in Cambodia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Cambodian History and Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre for Asia-Pacific Initiatives; National University of Singapore; Leverhulme Trust","keywords":"Buddhism; Constitution; Politics; Secular state; State (computer science); Political science; Law; Suffrage; Secularism; Sociology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011805301933866816,"score_gpt":0.2651618502207718,"score_spread":0.253356548286905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281650871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150818,0.0057087257,0.00006271926,0.0029691334,0.00082556205,0.000083663064,0.000013837879,0.000007562882,0.07524701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969147,0.0014703289,0.0000802361,0.0007759792,0.00019309613,8.856127e-7,9.172474e-7,0.000002078105,0.00056181004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992671,0.00012559841,0.00018435686,0.00006437363,0.00023944605,0.00011913533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996552,0.00006571908,0.000103830476,0.000030356008,0.000040320712,0.00010456403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006181817,0.000044420252,0.000114110466,0.000047231664,0.0007515228,0.000021572676,0.00005155856,0.00004974226,0.000030107314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029323035,0.000043209737,0.000046537683,0.00006359864,0.0011252495,0.00010587188,0.000026656817,0.00026704936,4.3112988e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000150288615,0.000031504584,0.004341783,0.0000057519965,0.000005171269,0.00005307053,0.0066189417,0.000027591592,0.00004353531,0.9831608,0.005637704,0.000059126593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005087268,0.000094269664,0.001328925,0.000017859937,0.0000146206585,0.00012299538,0.0032740715,0.000010187802,0.0000041215653,0.012193007,0.98234445,0.000086759086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009932355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020591702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97670674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022311408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002272071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5780181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283806312","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.18","title":"Neutralizing Secularism: Religious Antiliberalism and the Twentieth-Century Global Ecumenical Project","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Secularism; Human rights; Prerogative; Alliance; Christianity; Law; Political science; Secular state; Religious studies; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Politics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013157640206324298,"score_gpt":0.30245978308576965,"score_spread":0.28930214287944533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283806312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7247526,0.039037198,0.00013797618,0.0381195,0.002520132,0.0004941066,0.000032090782,0.000038116144,0.19486828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98557955,0.010453571,0.00016554294,0.0034091107,0.00027638662,0.0000020167345,9.726493e-7,0.0000034362995,0.000109431305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986275,0.000418306,0.00026839622,0.00009230976,0.0004073628,0.0001861194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994355,0.00012591077,0.00021364776,0.00006124529,0.00007053381,0.00009315266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092004647,0.00007352359,0.0001826011,0.000022514023,0.0010128092,0.00008628101,0.00013869259,0.000045638422,0.0000048619618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036285615,0.00004860245,0.00010573513,0.000116350224,0.0011495767,0.000106130654,0.000088815665,0.00027749556,2.8014864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115764924,0.000020034897,0.00028762608,0.000004105616,0.000028454591,0.000043129407,0.0017574129,0.000009511285,0.000007631,0.99069834,0.0068957135,0.00013229312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008101145,0.000097204815,0.0000587669,0.0000150447795,0.00006615809,0.00050027174,0.0013364243,0.000007985343,0.0000021147714,0.023761736,0.97326744,0.000076739685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062668417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007178478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075792566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045506525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9473632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318066208","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2022.57","title":"The Limits of Defining Identity in Religion-Gender Conflicts: A Response to Patrick Parkinson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Science North","funders":"Yale University","keywords":"Identity (music); Sincerity; Faith; Transgender; Government (linguistics); Gender identity; Belief system; Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Gender studies; Epistemology; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.03900396709018261,"score_gpt":0.3529645084555882,"score_spread":0.3139605413654056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318066208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95926356,0.0017414888,0.000064703585,0.00543071,0.00037207996,0.000086776934,0.0000059932177,0.000009814396,0.033024866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99246275,0.0063673942,0.00009743069,0.0007056798,0.000098508,0.0000010765733,3.730656e-7,0.0000035570697,0.00026323734],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987396,0.00027027077,0.00035689195,0.00006807491,0.00037781426,0.00018733891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985464,0.00088851404,0.00021381676,0.00006400609,0.000169429,0.0001178336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002241834,0.00005435161,0.000144848,0.00011424607,0.0003232769,0.00004450787,0.00013760287,0.000059466376,0.0000012919984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007079602,0.00003805787,0.00006291201,0.00043772205,0.00032680453,0.00013299951,0.000027881388,0.00013150698,0.00000885095],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003064832,0.000013170085,0.0026711798,0.000005928504,0.000011628202,0.00003274378,0.003258081,0.000075401185,0.00020646039,0.99072546,0.0024671308,0.00022631968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025498495,0.00013352542,0.0070521426,0.00008284599,0.000015047877,0.00001472494,0.0010809288,0.0000043692557,0.000048476515,0.010679535,0.98056656,0.00006685269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002390642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009056549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9800459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054643562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042251573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36139515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376587561","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.8","title":"The Laws of Hammurabi: At the Confluence of Royal and Scribal Traditions. By Pamela Barmash. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020. Pp. 336. $99.00 (cloth); $97.99 (digital). ISBN: 9780197525401.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"War, Ethics, and Justification","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Confluence; History; Art; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.028174152127406607,"score_gpt":0.2213194287273582,"score_spread":0.19314527659995157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376587561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84334284,0.03229023,0.00004283467,0.012538042,0.0011375421,0.00045575673,0.0006868938,0.000048463793,0.109457396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9281122,0.06124944,0.000007795057,0.0001714739,0.0002366352,8.886074e-7,0.000026453561,0.000012587641,0.0101825185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895656,0.00008238811,0.00040258013,0.00012255696,0.00028215267,0.00015375421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874336,0.00032601054,0.000436026,0.00015729929,0.00026524585,0.00007208136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044019948,0.0001202188,0.00021730486,0.000023992485,0.0007285286,0.00013765285,0.00019274784,0.0000832265,0.000024781231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003007407,0.000072566276,0.00010845472,0.000045571094,0.0011701949,0.00029906302,0.000047300844,0.00028724398,0.000001560944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049902534,0.00011274975,0.00027255577,0.00021188299,0.00019718983,0.000017783586,0.011959688,0.00009967641,0.0006469047,0.5377434,0.446125,0.0021141628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005224203,0.00019614512,0.00027649535,0.000104882616,0.00009012247,0.0000265456,0.0033819727,0.0001335843,0.00042913944,0.003734556,0.9910066,0.000097540105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034729065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020815487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5448816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023135946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046719557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56033266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384131537","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.17","title":"The Changing Terrain of Religious Freedom. Edited by Heather J. Sharkey and Jeffrey Edward Green. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2021. Pp. 288. $55.00 (cloth); $55.00 (paper); $55.00 (digital). ISBN: 9780812253375.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Terrain; Content (measure theory); Media studies; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography; Cartography; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010252230612790191,"score_gpt":0.24097210359622298,"score_spread":0.2307198729834328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384131537","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3512493,0.1590997,0.00094691466,0.10781023,0.004404677,0.0019440171,0.0018407226,0.00027133332,0.37243313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93954635,0.05677279,0.00008470278,0.00032297356,0.0008641843,7.829937e-7,0.00001544861,0.00002187572,0.0023708756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797964,0.00017142034,0.0005135351,0.00022512887,0.00064635684,0.00046392652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816716,0.00044841474,0.00058658014,0.00018695668,0.0003497196,0.00026117841],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084414374,0.00021052327,0.0004471938,0.00011010058,0.00079820614,0.00009511638,0.00037921366,0.00020395663,0.000039833783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011544181,0.0001638762,0.00019303216,0.00037345017,0.0018121103,0.0004491849,0.0001412085,0.00031760734,0.000008697736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005207876,0.0001931667,0.0012539614,0.00013306875,0.00039185103,0.00013689291,0.008407346,0.00009781685,0.0015554315,0.2500634,0.736159,0.0010872494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007532772,0.000157038,0.000112178444,0.00022200655,0.00008452642,0.000055369197,0.0029860004,0.000082804574,0.00005484276,0.00280419,0.99247515,0.00021259896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009902469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004540719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58829707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007737337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038865313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389396958","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.37","title":"Religious Freedom and Sacred Lands","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Indigenous; Framing (construction); Sovereignty; Injustice; Law; Adjudication; Self-determination; Political science; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Geography; Politics; Philosophy; Ecology","score_opus":0.013076662621205838,"score_gpt":0.29839421962862955,"score_spread":0.2853175570074237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389396958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150685,0.0030086646,0.000008368428,0.0017347616,0.0010664919,0.00008752764,0.0000011041146,0.000023958697,0.079000615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7473221,0.2498485,0.00009978481,0.00010672791,0.0010151322,1.3692649e-7,0.0000011150295,0.000005346552,0.0016011613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926513,0.0000793153,0.00020659962,0.000067673565,0.00020287452,0.00017840305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994649,0.0000848064,0.00013853238,0.000045896508,0.00011716861,0.00014867837],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079330686,0.00004985079,0.00012256339,0.000085436506,0.0016754617,0.00005038534,0.000060836035,0.00009400107,0.0000026642037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000054659217,0.000033395656,0.00003265674,0.00012610319,0.00015135332,0.00010748813,0.0000011223948,0.000109926674,0.00000755608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007255138,0.000060175393,0.0027688215,0.00006329536,0.000037106303,0.000066426524,0.36860886,0.000006597101,0.000038574948,0.60626495,0.021540172,0.00047246777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025037365,0.00011390699,0.0007015774,0.0000469602,0.000015128885,0.000043879023,0.0010871454,0.0000043141117,0.000018400788,0.017105684,0.9805555,0.000057164416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026230766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0824219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028292214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009439189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396241044","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2023.45","title":"Moses Mendelssohn and the Jewish Questions of Modern Natural Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Toleration; Judaism; Natural law; Enlightenment; Haskalah; Natural (archaeology); Law; Modernity; Philosophy; Religious studies; Classics; History; Theology; Political science; Jewish studies","score_opus":0.0227630601117135,"score_gpt":0.25606759601170487,"score_spread":0.23330453589999137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396241044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13824788,0.3670447,0.00009481869,0.06523242,0.0044199135,0.000284844,0.00008261016,0.00006081924,0.42453203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947875,0.0027949295,0.000020067668,0.0010685696,0.0008124937,6.3338166e-7,9.594696e-7,0.000005817404,0.0005089965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993953,0.00005104266,0.00025797146,0.000062903164,0.0001439331,0.00008880927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995686,0.00019238038,0.000060608763,0.000048093436,0.00007434603,0.00005598783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017307815,0.00007216128,0.00016772597,0.000025554724,0.00014392643,0.00011603267,0.000054388074,0.000030949774,0.000018088103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012013135,0.000034429755,0.00010008044,0.00001358398,0.0006175717,0.00015095044,0.000025177755,0.0002178052,0.0000012240325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006187732,0.000022813027,0.0000011830355,0.000050793173,0.000058966405,0.000009243578,0.0014329256,0.0000013056396,0.000034971297,0.99690753,0.0006766008,0.00074177847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029790946,0.000074242795,0.000004059806,0.00017969815,0.000078736586,0.000081047925,0.000031648477,0.00021666122,0.000057053527,0.7552377,0.24369927,0.000041950087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000104174214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000039862036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85653967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000006307391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009305047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22754686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403303691","doi":"10.1017/jlr.2024.15","title":"Leaving Iberia: Islamic Law and Christian Conquest in North West Africa. By Jocelyn Hendrickson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2021. Pp. 432. $50.00 (cloth). ISBN: 9780674248205.","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Religion","topic":"Islamic Studies and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"CONQUEST; Islam; History; Ancient history; Sharia; Theology; Philosophy; Archaeology","score_opus":0.008621365003364995,"score_gpt":0.21958697848370407,"score_spread":0.21096561348033907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403303691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13174993,0.30612502,0.00007126248,0.0061075008,0.0034999223,0.0004194103,0.00016347707,0.00007541941,0.55178803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84704596,0.14663011,0.0000665591,0.00028373863,0.00054570433,6.331218e-7,0.0000047117246,0.000016440883,0.005406133],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987635,0.00013008664,0.00030370304,0.0002276811,0.00028160342,0.0002934505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944514,0.00011326081,0.00016955426,0.00008125104,0.000096232165,0.00009453916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004106896,0.00015386545,0.00032282816,0.000068832116,0.0005919862,0.00013871863,0.0001503798,0.00013897015,0.000017638791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001673319,0.00013798974,0.0000750055,0.00015845418,0.00054240366,0.00035344178,0.000075493386,0.00039465862,0.000009518058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009660272,0.00007148676,0.0004658624,0.00011364854,0.00010970812,0.00054579665,0.011229747,0.000005770791,0.00017337904,0.2375629,0.7491868,0.00043830674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040304684,0.00011428451,0.00069444184,0.00017064952,0.00006506625,0.0000336633,0.0014914139,0.0000177327,0.000005949153,0.00023401731,0.99660254,0.00016720626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04893603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018506333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71529603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025272366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012675657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99940336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}