{"meta":{"query_hash":"c7d9738e00d6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy"},"cohort_total":204,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":204,"exported":204,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c7d9738e00d6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Law+and+Social+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1012836559","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1209","title":"Implementation of Housing Rights in South Africa: Approaches and Strategies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Disadvantaged; Political science; Economic growth; Jurisprudence; Fair Housing Act; Displacement (psychology); Development economics; Business; Law; Civil rights; Economics","score_opus":0.11425690676276906,"score_gpt":0.38279155091087763,"score_spread":0.26853464414810857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1012836559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94152534,0.00031956317,0.000018005449,0.0008639045,0.00006022572,0.00006257715,0.0000044380085,0.000004386342,0.057141535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989496,0.00000570179,0.00025472647,0.000032166427,0.00073009636,4.5514858e-7,1.6206738e-7,0.0000029884732,0.000024130684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914706,0.00014479533,0.00024891837,0.000052816176,0.0002562152,0.0001501961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995492,0.000026634367,0.00023993144,0.000022614784,0.00008148614,0.00008010191],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067519175,0.000053546108,0.00017794137,0.000090142756,0.00017116453,0.00008680526,0.000071165465,0.0000625781,0.000002530781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002557428,0.000045023236,0.000029415269,0.00013576729,0.00037852116,0.0003865919,0.000022883829,0.00009621637,2.1808897e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009276932,0.0000097598995,0.0007132537,0.000005161686,0.000007231301,0.0000017269339,0.55900264,9.2629597e-7,0.000006736363,0.4398715,0.0000188037,0.00035296258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016550353,0.00018633768,0.0045444136,0.0000248324,0.000046710018,0.0000020895,0.75742394,0.0000035785874,0.00010700409,0.19268252,0.04314609,0.00017745547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013927091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038151683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24718899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000688926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003384392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99263924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1016360343","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1213","title":"Catherine Lennon's Story: Lessons from Front Line Advocacy on the Human Right to Housing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreclosure; State (computer science); Front line; Front (military); Health care; Health insurance; Political science; Law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.07293925911620282,"score_gpt":0.2999499824076563,"score_spread":0.2270107232914535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1016360343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9245241,0.0004487407,0.00017229102,0.03623942,0.00034228901,0.000072068106,0.000066807566,0.000009911021,0.03812433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878289,0.00008650466,0.0001485162,0.007218429,0.0038956972,0.0000015314489,0.0000019802526,0.000024425115,0.0007939907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991767,0.000040020506,0.00035200137,0.00014040615,0.00006797263,0.00022293525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921376,0.000041875355,0.0004285376,0.00012715205,0.000053764954,0.000134919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005430192,0.00013127213,0.00040719446,0.0001265197,0.00039006703,0.000092342605,0.00019229126,0.000089333626,0.00003615598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024427885,0.000106038104,0.00011843086,0.00007935109,0.000094981544,0.00013162034,0.00004273684,0.0002831844,0.000043842352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053387983,0.00012347326,0.00032943286,0.0000048593397,0.00007554774,0.000020222782,0.021670347,0.000025309531,0.00011017622,0.95973843,0.01641838,0.0014304551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086364214,0.00021491344,0.003429894,0.000025237858,0.000011286591,0.0000044189946,0.0002785648,0.000014371545,0.000084154104,0.025499474,0.9693907,0.00018337047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007984135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005755488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9529723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016507658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008861871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99862176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1056179214","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1027","title":"A Full Range of Housing: Recent Developments in Protecting Rental Housing Stock under Municipal Planning Policies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Urbanization and City Planning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rental housing; Renting; Stock (firearms); Business; Subdivision; Political science; Civil engineering; Geography; Engineering; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09155530369486942,"score_gpt":0.3711078416055683,"score_spread":0.2795525379106989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1056179214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9898038,0.00010059372,0.00010797904,0.0022320028,0.00008992697,0.0001031794,0.0000016526486,0.000011022065,0.0075498573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99836653,0.00004722173,0.00037594262,0.0006261633,0.0005516511,7.138043e-7,5.064706e-7,0.000009915566,0.000021342723],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987766,0.00015322387,0.0003952665,0.00007203517,0.00034032454,0.00026256454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936724,0.000035957495,0.00037844674,0.000027020278,0.0001167509,0.00007458535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070095656,0.00008625611,0.00023238729,0.00020375731,0.0006785329,0.00007358567,0.00011258751,0.000105045634,0.000004696489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013229139,0.00008621424,0.000047723577,0.00035581717,0.00019281046,0.0002401543,0.00003718129,0.0002595314,2.8987313e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028305818,0.00020651442,0.019037616,0.000046924793,0.0000798215,0.000026128408,0.8454892,0.0007415798,0.0009546459,0.13031305,0.000037501286,0.0027839586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01772925,0.001149106,0.20563993,0.002954155,0.00018625929,0.00013591531,0.6830911,0.00005815001,0.0020415948,0.03531202,0.04984334,0.0018591499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013102128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004087921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18660231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003427564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005034013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9934697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1058365201","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1028","title":"The Critical Characteristics of Community Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0912782148151113,"score_gpt":0.45576877241492225,"score_spread":0.36449055759981097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1058365201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8098834,0.000012363577,0.000010319794,0.1480897,0.00035091344,0.000031824697,0.000002879642,0.0000019857846,0.04161657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960186,0.0000469337,0.00007391851,0.0029726895,0.00068910874,3.9560246e-7,4.657521e-7,0.0000023783584,0.00019549511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998977,0.00031195997,0.0003871409,0.000020043146,0.00018420896,0.00011965781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998856,0.0005161381,0.00024403859,0.000044437173,0.0002905532,0.000048813115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017689168,0.000037271577,0.0001261034,0.0000434259,0.001006157,0.00012803524,0.00014106238,0.00006955692,0.000013006602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014162477,0.000029579729,0.000046761612,0.00013524144,0.00060374325,0.00038331444,0.000017065193,0.00087503076,9.4011455e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001993909,0.00011691938,0.0008072143,0.0000025821416,0.0000063338725,8.203265e-7,0.082829565,1.12108616e-7,0.0000049573555,0.91500664,0.00010905888,0.001095861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004435073,0.0000913872,0.086022705,0.00001532192,0.000016496348,0.0000065121917,0.020847643,9.6237905e-8,0.000005717267,0.101941906,0.7905502,0.00005851897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48833227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44731215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81306475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019817191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003023292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77386475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1059798678","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1031","title":"Book Review: Are Prisons Obsolete?, by Angela Y. Davis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.021851014991880767,"score_gpt":0.3333454912575827,"score_spread":0.311494476265702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1059798678","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038618423,0.4903114,0.00009362771,0.3371192,0.0007418527,0.000448369,0.00019593404,0.000057045043,0.13241412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4872799,0.27215147,0.00008850524,0.21087861,0.01183091,0.000006810588,0.0000033597587,0.000045325687,0.017715137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988263,0.00010045431,0.00028333013,0.000091763686,0.00041985788,0.00027827386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915105,0.00004526999,0.000490975,0.000057971065,0.00011390106,0.00014081063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037858388,0.00010371774,0.00033005414,0.00003281298,0.00066395727,0.0000760654,0.00017389769,0.00010352368,0.00005733922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001370743,0.00009399414,0.00015963196,0.000120730314,0.00039368166,0.0004359513,0.000022902994,0.00023756461,0.000004511324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013882616,0.00009358761,0.000056173838,0.0000820594,0.00003704562,0.0000140292395,0.017140634,2.1153632e-7,0.000087636734,0.082630806,0.8977073,0.0021366512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033767306,0.000045887125,0.0004571048,0.00021196801,0.000032764074,0.000007284181,0.0011158752,2.8829637e-8,0.000047472033,0.0021288819,0.99550575,0.00010929624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012505637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013338733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44866148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002262289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037934608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1115536093","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1029","title":"A Response to \"The Critical Characteristics of Community Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.09211197741561815,"score_gpt":0.46165063457544253,"score_spread":0.36953865715982437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1115536093","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70027447,0.000003137089,0.000016932901,0.29316688,0.00018996638,0.000036504458,0.0000043807686,0.0000015461176,0.0063061793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863921,0.0000061005594,0.00017270939,0.012639552,0.0005665846,8.3207453e-7,3.852136e-7,0.0000029147807,0.0002188367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985347,0.0007098833,0.00039291693,0.000026364574,0.00021070876,0.00012544538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873465,0.00063202216,0.00018981214,0.000057656547,0.0003112104,0.00007462373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033696198,0.000042384032,0.00014705148,0.00009075225,0.0006408234,0.00010066094,0.0001620882,0.00007049173,0.0000232207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034244969,0.000035447163,0.000047286107,0.00024270316,0.00033212794,0.0003304559,0.000023447688,0.0007934067,0.000002463892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002267444,0.00017675688,0.0004427026,0.0000027362137,0.000006446315,0.0000020147497,0.2237466,5.690073e-7,0.00003105297,0.7744134,0.0003287661,0.00062218943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041901477,0.00016427688,0.10485845,0.000018656705,0.000013426491,0.000008353232,0.018670307,6.919469e-8,0.0000070489627,0.017324606,0.8584586,0.000057228215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43904468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3432195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8581298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002537529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035509707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66876507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1125468081","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1025","title":"Providing Services to Clients with Serious Mental Illness: New Challenges and Opportunities for Community Legal Clinics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Mental Health Treatment and Access","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental illness; Psychiatry; Legal service; Mental health; Business; Nursing; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14679265605715464,"score_gpt":0.4315217384286416,"score_spread":0.284729082371487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1125468081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97975874,0.0009900637,0.000005358696,0.015327772,0.00018773503,0.00029171168,0.00002137365,0.0000077981995,0.0034094222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.994094,0.00063398055,0.00013135937,0.003964093,0.0008119012,0.000008145083,0.000004489232,0.000013568168,0.00033842574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992648,0.00008272045,0.00026323748,0.000074609874,0.00010958872,0.00020508036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994613,0.00003973006,0.00021507012,0.00005369428,0.000045725217,0.00018447744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002704281,0.00011292497,0.00024983738,0.00006625829,0.00068008015,0.00005896961,0.000102991995,0.000071411414,0.00000323793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000019779711,0.00008643373,0.000039205028,0.000024710404,0.000073985495,0.00025125776,0.0000405804,0.00015644907,5.93901e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018206573,0.0005937891,0.0002486046,0.0004465344,0.00026984254,0.0000447696,0.21778475,5.1881386e-7,0.000016270666,0.46111616,0.00019112117,0.31746697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03826057,0.018060295,0.040428918,0.0010878716,0.0004779179,0.0010414774,0.4419265,0.0000021593714,0.00020166833,0.04880375,0.40852168,0.0011871605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034763734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017114409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41231242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006224572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000084695814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.525526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1270244821","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1016","title":"Book Review: Self-Employed Workers Organize: Law, Policy and Unions, by Cynthia J. Cranford, Judy Fudge, Eric Tucker, and Leah F. Vosko","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.009932197139404048,"score_gpt":0.31528524703428545,"score_spread":0.30535304989488143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1270244821","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24509451,0.31251758,0.0001424073,0.34992474,0.0009428194,0.0015908051,0.00021186711,0.00022848388,0.089346796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39223722,0.303329,0.00038173073,0.28650653,0.0077030347,0.0000046372334,0.000010479563,0.00008503981,0.009742356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981731,0.0002095302,0.00052587804,0.00016195269,0.00042714243,0.00050239987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988162,0.00011881361,0.00036640998,0.000083555096,0.00021602621,0.00039898057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012754151,0.0001876033,0.00042856348,0.00013029162,0.00147155,0.00017154228,0.00017474467,0.00017417062,0.000056591747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015015267,0.00016011727,0.000087421584,0.00047288078,0.0006221758,0.0005303492,0.000074991716,0.00029797916,0.0000010502702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039978077,0.00016606806,0.00054974505,0.0000911273,0.00014643854,0.000017439645,0.01115929,2.4390411e-8,0.00018902915,0.6671986,0.3160792,0.004363051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007755317,0.00010140063,0.0039805216,0.00011375436,0.00007982041,0.0000149301395,0.0010992094,1.1827575e-7,0.000021989712,0.0022762804,0.99134994,0.00018652664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021233076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034873926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67527074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017704135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040363066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134984923","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1197","title":"Transformative Social Work in the Criminal Justice Field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Conviction; Criminal justice; Work (physics); Criminology; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Social work; Political science; Law; Social justice; Public relations; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.07027117737201392,"score_gpt":0.4345513415156712,"score_spread":0.36428016414365727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134984923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09434109,0.000014682562,0.00019139085,0.54014575,0.00028193605,0.000060059407,0.0000011453839,0.000004147336,0.36495978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728049,0.000017913413,0.000057547673,0.023136552,0.0038245572,0.0000012268919,2.819112e-7,0.0000021451126,0.00015489385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989868,0.00039989865,0.00021745852,0.000032302167,0.00023061225,0.00013292846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992423,0.00041611845,0.00016354244,0.000020092646,0.00012858702,0.000029356004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014726667,0.000043259806,0.00009733919,0.00006492403,0.0011647348,0.0001592592,0.00013550324,0.00007213388,0.000039857026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041531873,0.000032051543,0.00004935939,0.00035410436,0.00017070015,0.00046619138,0.0000042656375,0.0004064772,0.0000030945935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018695613,0.000025191954,0.000009840159,0.0000053381145,0.0000036487945,3.24485e-7,0.35286158,8.318094e-8,0.0000015314819,0.63890886,0.0033167938,0.0048481026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028969123,0.00005401081,0.002850658,0.0000072554194,0.000066577035,0.0000038810595,0.1328932,7.3933506e-7,0.0000043755376,0.018816216,0.84494954,0.000063840766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003236356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00087223673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8784638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040246374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032914898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89583164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W157926775","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1062","title":"New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v. G.(J.): En Route to More Equitable Access to the Legal System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03671431630726523,"score_gpt":0.37204518587448204,"score_spread":0.3353308695672168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157926775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82338166,0.0005930912,0.000049326103,0.111667804,0.00021407784,0.00038568195,0.00001699451,0.000016610196,0.063674726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98602796,0.00006799069,0.000037250815,0.010346674,0.002507472,0.0000010063437,4.6084924e-7,0.000009135193,0.0010020776],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99796724,0.0007033745,0.0005124086,0.00007987759,0.00040090142,0.00033617142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990063,0.00009618783,0.00031440274,0.00009198978,0.00014591348,0.00034524014],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022532584,0.000104582265,0.0004281961,0.00006291779,0.0018665054,0.00037686393,0.0004990788,0.00008761551,0.0000135635055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003633724,0.000075232296,0.00006680803,0.00029392962,0.000114246,0.0005392814,0.00012464111,0.00028343833,0.0000030783708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001924242,0.000081013946,0.001798451,0.0006496289,0.00009033595,0.000004289158,0.603256,0.0000131367815,0.000016005839,0.35376006,0.006020055,0.03411864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005670943,0.0004420617,0.010218568,0.0003714877,0.00003288176,0.000021414342,0.07450605,0.0000017740643,0.000013005315,0.0011632198,0.91248757,0.00017490266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7145765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10807963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9064675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014167794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016354158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596681594","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1191","title":"Conceptualizing Reflective Practice for Legal Professionals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Conceptualization; Rigour; Engineering ethics; Legal practice; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.08073064703695744,"score_gpt":0.5121997335205556,"score_spread":0.43146908648359816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596681594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01024649,0.000049519294,0.0009588746,0.5344903,0.00076528935,0.00017633745,0.0000050276994,0.000012759249,0.4532954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96426654,0.000017445223,0.0016726294,0.02618961,0.0061775804,0.0000045005327,8.3449896e-7,0.0000058250157,0.001665024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894035,0.00040067622,0.00024448824,0.000056192373,0.00021464632,0.00014366215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976743,0.00090514217,0.0004714217,0.000027367476,0.0008529862,0.00006881831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019263941,0.00004793377,0.00012528103,0.00006260966,0.0011340573,0.00017307732,0.00008153397,0.00007754058,0.000020434205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004197499,0.000042190633,0.00005508866,0.00016049757,0.00021383978,0.0012666393,0.000009577757,0.00024136568,0.000001991748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035737303,0.00006283552,0.000004145529,0.0000041344265,0.00001987399,1.9164293e-7,0.06319227,1.3955051e-7,0.000047224457,0.9259087,0.008984301,0.0017404428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028565206,0.0000726667,0.00005040596,0.000008657721,0.000022649403,0.000005283329,0.031766523,0.000001159285,0.000024210482,0.03349539,0.9342166,0.000050758772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00379149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002982291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9540201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085828186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00125714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8722366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W165177754","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1193","title":"Law Student, Heal Thyself: The Role and Responsibility of Clinical Education Programs in Promoting Self-Care","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Mental health; Psychology; Addiction; Political science; Medical education; Nursing; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07293553762130897,"score_gpt":0.4943147035579832,"score_spread":0.42137916593667424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W165177754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92085624,0.00007919902,7.8482003e-7,0.037921384,0.00018150489,0.00015701509,6.713842e-7,0.000005181359,0.040798027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965857,0.000036247835,0.00016375308,0.0014884054,0.0016891087,0.0000028174159,5.839401e-7,0.000003259043,0.000030073374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980852,0.0009949704,0.00050271116,0.00007314987,0.00022940384,0.000114559356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873525,0.0002968098,0.00047771394,0.000055235036,0.0003720971,0.000062878156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004139941,0.00004735445,0.00016565906,0.000043433625,0.00048910495,0.00013003894,0.000110342626,0.000081617356,0.000003164063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006853317,0.00003503419,0.000048292768,0.00020847378,0.00035949834,0.00036037507,0.000022082973,0.00034686533,3.4406875e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020878373,0.00027146807,0.038155336,0.000012683257,0.000010158129,5.8440612e-8,0.2079012,3.0628826e-8,0.0000046148966,0.7289382,0.000022472379,0.02466286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007110248,0.0003123259,0.29072317,0.000048441925,0.000047946123,0.0000047060153,0.174181,0.000005201401,0.000010541648,0.05652651,0.47731367,0.000115485156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0128631145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007262924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67241174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054231423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014547308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99371034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1696780779","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1190","title":"Framing Supervisory Relationships in Clinical Law: The Role of Critical Pedagogy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Political science; Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.15555622381080705,"score_gpt":0.4989572005660606,"score_spread":0.3434009767552535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1696780779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3446925,0.00017286303,0.000057113022,0.2889985,0.00039495958,0.00006359465,0.0000023365872,0.000005660704,0.36561248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99398553,0.000038495054,0.00012243817,0.0033742231,0.0023937735,6.568075e-7,2.553985e-7,0.000003347083,0.000081277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811095,0.001048431,0.00047644327,0.000045665016,0.00019941719,0.00011909514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976379,0.0018246908,0.00019852242,0.00004573247,0.00023689859,0.00005625244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038062786,0.000037819584,0.00013889502,0.000059234764,0.0006376556,0.00006878335,0.00011961804,0.000116484436,0.000032137505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037458974,0.000029605506,0.00006458386,0.00017226096,0.00075560046,0.00040030005,0.000014600613,0.0006499711,0.0000025932293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005888133,0.00007058351,0.003246781,0.0000033005742,0.0000047057883,1.5886629e-7,0.04163381,2.5209422e-7,0.000008624107,0.95259696,0.00011059075,0.0023183161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000197589,0.00004172082,0.030698277,0.000009743603,0.000019022396,0.000002998067,0.031942617,0.000009825155,0.0000056802924,0.2926467,0.6443749,0.000050935698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0147218425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075938697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6599503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027784265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00067529996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99183923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1739854090","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1195","title":"Pushing the Boundaries of Clinical Law: Exploring How Student and Community Legal Clinics Engage with International Human Rights Practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Compliance (psychology); Political science; International human rights law; Law; International law; Government (linguistics); International community; Legal research; Public relations; Psychology","score_opus":0.2086279458538344,"score_gpt":0.5176745390674697,"score_spread":0.30904659321363537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1739854090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7594127,0.000014832449,0.000043708962,0.13877855,0.0005660336,0.00006211383,0.0000025627812,0.000006012212,0.10111345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936702,0.000042552187,0.0002671391,0.0029844176,0.0028751781,0.0000014951889,8.0754893e-7,0.000004369475,0.00015381406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968124,0.0021874737,0.00043073922,0.000053540425,0.0004090912,0.00010676082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624044,0.0021863854,0.0008575759,0.000072843904,0.0005755773,0.00006720491],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008497955,0.00006212956,0.0001920982,0.000043749056,0.005011989,0.001014664,0.00023509862,0.000063590276,0.0000060343723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019993281,0.00004207812,0.000052112722,0.00009617059,0.0014262181,0.0020120426,0.000053259777,0.0013151336,2.5103031e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035143414,0.00015006779,0.0006194279,0.0000037264736,0.000073805284,6.77365e-7,0.10176979,1.7945356e-7,0.0000031120453,0.8963123,0.0002342506,0.000797514],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004256629,0.00015629656,0.0061307563,0.000015169914,0.000049147282,0.000008383181,0.05060976,7.109974e-7,0.0000042953457,0.01024275,0.9323047,0.000052398642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038591836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018819656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93207043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036794485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004256747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177593734","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1060","title":"Peering into the Bedrooms of the Province: An Examination of the Different Definitions of Spouse in the Family Law Act and the Ontario Works Act, 1997","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peering; Spouse; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.035919147945312375,"score_gpt":0.30085398466448343,"score_spread":0.26493483671917106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W177593734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97749186,0.00019228896,4.777386e-7,0.013809873,0.00005158083,0.00026542426,0.0000054091865,0.0000018582222,0.008181203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985486,0.00046054885,0.000006957883,0.00060444034,0.00028613565,0.0000045708553,2.9987615e-7,0.0000040437158,0.000084365],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820274,0.000747488,0.00034873406,0.000063482024,0.0004872949,0.00015025218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990444,0.00035385534,0.00037923802,0.00009753962,0.000100526544,0.00002444402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011280881,0.0000956759,0.00024185081,0.000014481209,0.0013089085,0.000075007076,0.00041496623,0.000077245204,0.0000065702097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008710844,0.000034245542,0.0001487871,0.00015015568,0.0019703803,0.0001985518,0.000066158136,0.00035961025,7.060981e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054999924,0.000101837286,0.0019499826,0.000012690825,0.000056131757,2.9468444e-7,0.66600776,0.000014863447,0.000107970074,0.3254012,0.000030127329,0.0062621543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00087517407,0.00007091741,0.9150286,0.000099255274,0.00010493712,0.0000023707248,0.06540418,0.000006025851,0.00007282496,0.014482463,0.0037715957,0.00008169288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20386834,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4248953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014319258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013128917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1777531247","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1026","title":"The Role of PLEI in Poverty Law Services","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019771404257513458,"score_gpt":0.3744577847136049,"score_spread":0.35468638045609147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1777531247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29075402,0.00027602437,0.0000015923385,0.24204701,0.00022550797,0.00006388845,0.0000043415343,0.0000043110012,0.4666233],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937306,0.00011900346,0.000032944215,0.0051585915,0.0008501888,4.5508872e-7,2.1338266e-7,0.0000021963674,0.0001057875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937975,0.00008507119,0.00022022407,0.00002783986,0.00018350864,0.00010360691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994539,0.00008858101,0.00024260746,0.000027667002,0.00015309219,0.00003417541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060420355,0.000031867185,0.00008301609,0.000037217378,0.0005540107,0.000099512814,0.000115922245,0.00004829349,0.0000098990795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064904525,0.000022788707,0.0000356277,0.00019970183,0.00021222385,0.00045494983,0.0000102532995,0.00017756851,0.0000012848731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000957117,0.000035773664,0.00016174495,0.000002530707,0.000007211495,2.6673183e-7,0.052290622,8.914608e-7,0.000074347365,0.9463882,0.000054056025,0.0009747824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022910016,0.000018965095,0.0020862822,0.000008917853,0.000005631353,0.0000016046998,0.026790082,2.5802734e-7,0.000070352406,0.2513956,0.71936256,0.000030608466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12612739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0477922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7193085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067429755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000630451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9695831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916555074","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1024","title":"Child Welfare Reform: Protecting Children or Policing the Poor","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare reform; Welfare; Criminology; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019937664605730133,"score_gpt":0.30695125472935064,"score_spread":0.2870135901236205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916555074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85802555,0.00007214394,0.000033944496,0.07904497,0.00019213244,0.00021734151,0.000010475716,0.000023101395,0.062380325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911327,0.00013898284,0.00009205362,0.0033978669,0.005102706,0.0000014442157,5.8228557e-7,0.0000130946155,0.00012059707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874675,0.00014375796,0.0003021578,0.00008724673,0.00036070976,0.00035934855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938494,0.00001615457,0.00029545094,0.00006062026,0.00012920988,0.00011364441],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008498532,0.00011085778,0.00020942501,0.00007522781,0.004229182,0.00015366636,0.00026064675,0.00013035125,0.000005995092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011408676,0.00006729849,0.00012406688,0.00026159908,0.00033200718,0.00023823793,0.000042612082,0.00046522927,0.000001320829],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032910033,0.000046142246,0.00073041907,0.000009609153,0.000072850875,0.000005828114,0.11557825,0.000010110576,0.000019302026,0.8807556,0.000031100655,0.0027078928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057908082,0.00077368785,0.53291833,0.00025247544,0.0002623076,0.0005865434,0.3261018,0.0000070325686,0.00009720871,0.070882566,0.061294537,0.0010327307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1174939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013879685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80987304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031017885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035398803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99706715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941609635","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1000","title":"Don't Get Enough Credit: The Need for an Impartial Consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Appeal; Tribunal; Liability; Business; Credit history; Law; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04621000422786614,"score_gpt":0.36957719301974,"score_spread":0.32336718879187387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941609635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8596807,0.0002874144,0.00007120623,0.054757733,0.0014335015,0.0005869983,0.000034465007,0.000032180335,0.083115764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98706675,0.000012037133,0.00018123002,0.0018160371,0.010106425,0.0000033991369,0.0000034732118,0.000008514505,0.0008021448],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801433,0.00023330052,0.00061359664,0.00013937149,0.0005238055,0.00047559425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988839,0.00012384188,0.00045797369,0.000102514285,0.00022786991,0.00020387542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019424878,0.00013208886,0.000372401,0.00008241205,0.0008677228,0.00021755647,0.00032213973,0.00019653076,0.000035162066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003044469,0.00009879662,0.00017996356,0.00016257519,0.0005389735,0.00047798926,0.000024813966,0.0004724809,0.0000012955037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006625955,0.00030944374,0.0031499176,0.0000064997744,0.000080717226,0.00015480738,0.5944231,0.0000057993316,0.00010563053,0.38462564,0.013644638,0.0028311734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014379753,0.00043024778,0.008724668,0.0000115749135,0.000060186117,0.000050706614,0.0058191726,0.000004004384,0.00002083779,0.02916574,0.9541008,0.00017411784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19118871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17405744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94045615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035451556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014562517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84101385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200544033","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1066","title":"Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) and the Rights of Children","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.010252196057437329,"score_gpt":0.272799447896492,"score_spread":0.2625472518390547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200544033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94609797,0.00012979662,3.6332688e-7,0.012880228,0.000042583673,0.000051928153,0.000012024415,6.3727794e-7,0.040784467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99599385,0.00009189871,0.000009154533,0.00050047983,0.0010524755,2.3049674e-7,3.7381807e-7,0.0000020313391,0.0023494791],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932873,0.00010738358,0.00021151076,0.000050918956,0.00022704116,0.00007439039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995741,0.000058820286,0.0001719539,0.000026814341,0.00013395597,0.00003434292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033050534,0.000045098215,0.0001590443,0.000021857833,0.00040018014,0.000024436087,0.00006118358,0.00003370003,0.000055226265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011035427,0.00002458305,0.00003822746,0.000031395582,0.0011038879,0.0000691491,0.000007907239,0.00006932927,7.9192546e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056811983,0.000008206681,0.0002476578,0.0000034836353,0.00005449358,7.8246654e-7,0.011403203,1.2221777e-7,0.0000080977625,0.98706096,0.00066066056,0.00049552455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003431603,0.00017726826,0.17142808,0.00006440823,0.0001473025,0.0000741561,0.0022390778,0.0000027307956,0.00045726984,0.6925874,0.12914671,0.00024400553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4313803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26565412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29447356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001999734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017776925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74774575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122832781","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1053","title":"Disability, Poverty, and the Income Tax: The Case for Refundable Credits","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Earned income tax credit; Public economics; Tax reform; Tax avoidance; Government (linguistics); Tax policy; Income tax; Poverty; Business; Direct tax; Work (physics); Indirect tax; State income tax; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03311607088496121,"score_gpt":0.34014681382515677,"score_spread":0.30703074294019556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122832781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8866138,0.00031989402,0.00006565919,0.08522741,0.00039087015,0.00027162593,0.000036939116,0.0000083745845,0.027065422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99064153,0.0005613825,0.000040861247,0.004267575,0.0037989635,0.0000030989363,3.4645512e-7,0.000006722495,0.00067951175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898136,0.00024795326,0.00024580248,0.00007570594,0.00020351294,0.00024566913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911773,0.00039508476,0.00018149104,0.000069068454,0.00014590763,0.00009072508],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016771815,0.00008031835,0.0002038903,0.000018849776,0.0020373943,0.00019792328,0.00017525902,0.0000925839,0.0000044470494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002147695,0.000043371307,0.0001127206,0.00013089576,0.0013415196,0.00018925789,0.00005183607,0.00017091997,3.15775e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085810694,0.000036568214,0.0035034409,0.000011222214,0.000036864418,0.000016585169,0.03413912,8.443638e-7,0.0000021398923,0.9590504,0.0018877529,0.0012292418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003202424,0.00015512695,0.020525865,0.000013596741,0.0001406632,0.0005007838,0.05318298,0.000080018115,6.7627917e-7,0.5858009,0.3361944,0.0002025584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018028403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014482767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3732495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000764447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017438078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173654816","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1033","title":"Fair Hearings in an Ocean Port World - A Textured Concept","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Port (circuit theory); Political science; Engineering; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.025969928278584197,"score_gpt":0.274844033713249,"score_spread":0.24887410543466482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173654816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46509212,0.00010704003,0.0000026011978,0.004273816,0.00015309319,0.00005546632,0.000008253357,0.000008162666,0.5302994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98993045,0.0000065687404,0.000019818943,0.0038488943,0.001391343,3.0585002e-7,0.0000012001362,0.0000055996406,0.0047958335],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993541,0.00007139377,0.00024297168,0.0000624736,0.000094345116,0.0001746693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997184,0.000015231213,0.00010507929,0.000032867723,0.00006119705,0.00006717989],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015663325,0.000074847885,0.0002089792,0.0001246097,0.00019071707,0.000054702457,0.00006463677,0.00003341979,0.00031370163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009125694,0.000062833795,0.00006181419,0.000030127829,0.00039397881,0.00021684023,0.000016365022,0.00019229173,0.0000014452205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002056854,0.00004754205,0.00029720867,0.0000054429374,0.0000106068555,0.000024622108,0.05140718,1.7352947e-7,0.000010281091,0.94576913,0.00082857884,0.0015786367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011169779,0.00036534184,0.0029211165,0.00001841135,0.000017159191,0.000064105625,0.0062741367,0.0000021602564,0.000037471156,0.21089602,0.7781067,0.00018043777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028762051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100083025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77727807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019116476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008087576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55848676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181630519","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1046","title":"Re-Constructing the Work of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal: First Steps to a Fairer Process","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Process (computing); Rental housing; Renting; Work (physics); Business; Political science; Sociology; Process management; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.06177985682178997,"score_gpt":0.3334350345422878,"score_spread":0.2716551777204978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181630519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92643833,0.00007688103,0.000003844034,0.05138729,0.00020869025,0.000105073836,0.0000016617984,0.0000045236907,0.021773698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973288,0.00001662007,0.000041467836,0.0009328062,0.0013250844,8.4619506e-7,3.0634677e-8,0.0000054412644,0.00034886185],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988029,0.00011747656,0.00031147056,0.00007363673,0.0004661671,0.00022833442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931055,0.00010350358,0.00032448568,0.00006174267,0.00012046958,0.000079248835],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006629561,0.00007715308,0.00019129913,0.000031688676,0.0013592433,0.00012144489,0.00032218965,0.00006431624,0.00005427899],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017356093,0.000046524012,0.00013747925,0.00027837534,0.0005052668,0.00020192821,0.000053945252,0.00025251377,0.0000010659925],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097834134,0.00007137805,0.015548276,0.000037569505,0.00005461062,0.000006795405,0.89758015,0.000015081045,0.00002193724,0.07309916,0.0035201104,0.009947079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017567809,0.00042090905,0.086043514,0.001410742,0.00043202817,0.00009199334,0.31798533,0.000006011711,0.0004047514,0.021832833,0.5688765,0.0007385938],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06798819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22031161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57959485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016933333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019238266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181653631","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1045","title":"Babies as Bargaining Chips - In Defence of Birthright Citizenship in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.026027322780194845,"score_gpt":0.25358817028766445,"score_spread":0.2275608475074696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181653631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8035753,0.000610666,1.8085774e-7,0.0041612503,0.00009994602,0.000028819211,0.0000061124906,0.0000013325072,0.1915164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979691,0.0004104045,0.000007416374,0.00076902553,0.0004180951,2.9700644e-7,7.5200106e-8,0.0000032545713,0.00042234105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912566,0.00012181387,0.00026904637,0.00004761757,0.0002461749,0.00018966584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999618,0.00006266759,0.00015705737,0.00002447008,0.000041452266,0.000096363816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003558418,0.00004249031,0.0001880836,0.00029844837,0.00030938396,0.00005186866,0.000110571134,0.000052392723,0.00013850548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014353434,0.000050597188,0.000040245974,0.00023169507,0.0003637708,0.00011728166,0.000009254389,0.00017852538,0.0000011150328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011601865,0.000017000837,0.0053899786,0.000015734588,0.000010618222,0.000088342924,0.09178883,0.0000028010897,0.000020622185,0.8967593,0.0028920353,0.0030031777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003230337,0.0001982823,0.16559947,0.00043403992,0.00004038322,0.000054360815,0.07283407,0.000015598878,0.000037426085,0.2291351,0.5276857,0.0007352371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99866563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99985373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6676242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010467999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024036306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42639378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185652314","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1056","title":"The Ontario Human Rights Code and the Right to Accommodation in the Workplace for Employees with Disabilities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Reasonable accommodation; Human rights; Code (set theory); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.05474742949953681,"score_gpt":0.37999667982010105,"score_spread":0.32524925032056423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185652314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8277127,0.000010329471,0.0000238869,0.107423015,0.000041446066,0.00025170695,0.000002710189,0.0000030369094,0.064531155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960474,0.000010036014,0.000017124676,0.0015104412,0.000598896,0.000009736931,4.828061e-7,0.0000025138802,0.0018033743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909514,0.00029941648,0.00018283157,0.000048077298,0.00022940726,0.00014510816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992372,0.000508185,0.000100526544,0.000045931745,0.000072628565,0.000035561323],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016133413,0.000053129996,0.000115411334,0.00002152704,0.0024831314,0.00032516327,0.00017849359,0.000034023356,0.000006653682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000058804144,0.0000219069,0.000041719766,0.000079649326,0.0007881771,0.00018641459,0.0000132906835,0.000106158375,2.716435e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000101753096,0.00001876769,0.00045747732,0.0000014007198,0.000007645378,2.2020278e-7,0.20924544,4.460618e-7,2.6576166e-7,0.7894746,0.0004826991,0.00020931046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008565219,0.000086013206,0.009640955,0.000012476357,0.000020650336,0.000002410609,0.024299059,4.5444324e-7,0.000001511579,0.3979072,0.5671177,0.00005508324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1069457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7917543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000080475074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071825554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185925100","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1040","title":"Book Review: Disorderly People: Law and the Politics of Exlusion in Ontario, eds., Joe Hermer and Janet Mosher","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01031553704967533,"score_gpt":0.28697485036962983,"score_spread":0.2766593133199545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185925100","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19716345,0.36639866,0.000002291762,0.09385378,0.00032748442,0.0006699135,0.000014914123,0.0000103696,0.34155914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70919627,0.18901974,0.000074468255,0.08798996,0.0010732728,0.0000047424655,0.0000014331583,0.000018015924,0.012622091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876755,0.00033979389,0.00032404132,0.00007806409,0.00027890262,0.00021164223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945515,0.000086689404,0.00022710244,0.000047622296,0.00009729139,0.00008616521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008918758,0.000095073905,0.00035310886,0.000007971209,0.0006854708,0.000054180866,0.000091551476,0.00014264384,0.000104757164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007076368,0.00006194358,0.00009524932,0.00010222071,0.0010661178,0.00022148,0.000026579259,0.00029976663,2.9028035e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015442105,0.000036537902,0.00045514072,0.00006870322,0.000023996661,0.0000012991709,0.09225484,9.627784e-8,0.0000073291167,0.8895154,0.01737684,0.00024437907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097470294,0.000041083684,0.0018589065,0.00011896611,0.000053598935,0.0000119085125,0.0046274965,1.7855882e-7,0.0000027101846,0.034984455,0.957239,0.000087049484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11827087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16061473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93986213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006413361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026162478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88760066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194349905","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1006","title":"Inadequacies of the Humanitarian and Compassionate Procedure for Abused Immigrant Spouses","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Psychology; Compassionate Use; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.03082993945983471,"score_gpt":0.35133103207551697,"score_spread":0.32050109261568227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194349905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9819867,0.0003812028,0.000015473855,0.01591881,0.00010746447,0.00013911797,0.000016392909,0.000003180165,0.001431638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962477,0.000026701002,0.00003356393,0.0028847186,0.0006568767,0.0000014416977,5.871535e-7,0.000004127945,0.00014430188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994244,0.000044512486,0.00026710282,0.000050152514,0.00008716079,0.00012668029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995339,0.000037972546,0.00024910338,0.000038940343,0.000091578535,0.000048492006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016600563,0.000060752816,0.00017909266,0.000047600264,0.00029468906,0.000014514578,0.00006558208,0.00006647736,0.0000081667395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002004214,0.00003850351,0.00006543082,0.000048113507,0.00010368157,0.000053618507,0.0000043313257,0.00010444948,2.0247978e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002301595,0.00010495054,0.0006465709,0.00005946689,0.0000341212,0.0000010793107,0.07115147,2.1284264e-7,0.00022406815,0.92111415,0.003902549,0.0025312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036968563,0.0009343993,0.8226846,0.00007904444,0.00008173796,0.000107004875,0.00791722,0.0000040153714,0.0001650076,0.111336276,0.05284603,0.00014784669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007388891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094236823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.822038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011319076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009124758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22665396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195440575","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1021","title":"Social Assistance, Overpayment Recovery, and the Rule of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028716771348224993,"score_gpt":0.3542771213668193,"score_spread":0.32556035001859435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195440575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2307489,0.0010479381,0.0000060307725,0.21938276,0.00031448688,0.00021428763,0.00002867662,0.000015378602,0.54824156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98300296,0.0013248083,0.000037533264,0.004937944,0.009779658,0.0000020193136,2.3441554e-7,0.000007686164,0.00090718234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861485,0.00022602903,0.00040046594,0.00007631294,0.00041105927,0.00027126248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915355,0.00014970181,0.00044982263,0.00003598526,0.00014115388,0.000069779504],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010266533,0.00010609132,0.00040829563,0.000045382356,0.0019971738,0.0000748088,0.00014362192,0.00013573981,0.000006708994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007632281,0.0000679868,0.00021222513,0.00011483566,0.0026226786,0.00025776945,0.000057072426,0.00020000548,8.633755e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012198134,0.000035022807,0.00003191847,0.000010579461,0.00010271996,6.2935095e-7,0.083017506,1.8091167e-7,0.000012583045,0.91085935,0.0012999708,0.004507546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036890619,0.00012282624,0.0053542973,0.000035057667,0.0001666252,0.00000662505,0.017441515,0.0000012167944,0.000073580464,0.42823753,0.54462045,0.00025123265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010458237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003185703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.752254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010293678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018669298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195492885","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1047","title":"Case Commentary: Turnbull, et al. v. Famous Players","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029434935793384118,"score_gpt":0.2700224357575271,"score_spread":0.24058749996414297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195492885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3685922,0.0009568823,0.0000049414857,0.2565864,0.00065567985,0.00010931291,0.00018125835,0.00002763038,0.37288567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82600045,0.00009078522,0.000015853551,0.16773006,0.002457577,3.673974e-7,0.0000018950777,0.000009827904,0.003693176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994228,0.00003437905,0.00021831118,0.000056337085,0.0001236479,0.00014455733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960756,0.00001833988,0.00019605565,0.000038690963,0.00006195538,0.00007740291],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010301941,0.00009494976,0.00020308905,0.000060432696,0.00041123672,0.0001832029,0.000052800806,0.00002794817,0.0012637039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003046812,0.00007045136,0.00010013873,0.000017787757,0.00028984773,0.00022526649,0.000015773174,0.00023714988,0.0000027928124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010723246,0.000046439294,0.0000068579848,0.0000039287206,0.000036027635,0.0006245044,0.101610504,1.604354e-7,0.0000029322161,0.44201115,0.45393696,0.0017098087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003399786,0.00012331056,0.000011615086,0.000007732145,0.000020909794,0.0009398588,0.0074356194,0.0000035530165,8.334143e-7,0.00022221773,0.990808,0.00008634416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028386589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003232464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5368711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024894856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014097568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195883719","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1048","title":"Book Review: Poverty Bonds, by P. W. Burman","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Bond; Sociology; Materials science; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03271612405104098,"score_gpt":0.34158531891384347,"score_spread":0.3088691948628025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195883719","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001997021,0.24060714,0.000014382663,0.1922698,0.00041691653,0.0001769903,0.00003292598,0.000027467077,0.56445736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1540899,0.20899154,0.000024781082,0.5876447,0.008585563,0.0000020133286,0.0000029279931,0.00002384338,0.040634744],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984078,0.00033268728,0.0004470177,0.000080642065,0.0004454412,0.000286433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927783,0.000043570708,0.00034566713,0.000060894825,0.0001399313,0.00013210265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010278232,0.00009708169,0.0003416982,0.000037264428,0.00077352265,0.0000670006,0.00018425394,0.00011245167,0.00082666415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013536139,0.0000797675,0.00014535506,0.000115830655,0.00027060378,0.00043275388,0.000024572386,0.00021574237,0.000018652825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032967457,0.000047979727,0.000028715096,0.00004272782,0.000016019681,0.0000023282341,0.00532296,7.297786e-9,0.000015321284,0.07253315,0.919956,0.0020314418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002457125,0.000055015465,0.000091117254,0.00005596121,0.000025060568,0.000004062333,0.0002337318,7.747792e-7,0.000007049917,0.0020178058,0.9971631,0.000100575744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00384125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009016756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5238226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011778882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008887722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90513927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196217095","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1039","title":"Case Comment: Mack et al. v. Attorney General of Canada - Rethinking the Contemporary Conception of Judicial Discretion and Justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial discretion; Discretion; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Judicial review","score_opus":0.061486698478188495,"score_gpt":0.33806912484068713,"score_spread":0.27658242636249863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196217095","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8124426,0.0012125213,0.00011637115,0.093533315,0.0005407463,0.00016382044,0.00006141176,0.0000038124776,0.09192541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903578,0.00027464065,0.00002889455,0.008755669,0.0005593193,3.7610707e-7,5.785059e-7,0.0000023057103,0.00002037219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894786,0.00031449072,0.00028265538,0.000049509224,0.00029531386,0.000110163135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992845,0.00011890104,0.00034580595,0.000021672653,0.00017891703,0.000050178336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008368054,0.0000588713,0.00019404753,0.000020949716,0.0009196308,0.000018374467,0.000049244183,0.0000415021,0.0000059941244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001288827,0.000043790384,0.00004562749,0.000076836535,0.0009850893,0.000117163036,0.000015405805,0.00012688331,2.8625378e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002754782,0.0000148552335,0.00022614287,0.000008004749,0.000041076833,0.000019636527,0.015546596,0.0000021347025,0.00004635142,0.9798387,0.0040193875,0.0002095118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024440435,0.00032943062,0.0042949677,0.00017572638,0.00036836517,0.00030283025,0.07747563,0.000016367754,0.00023009162,0.2210586,0.69291925,0.00038466422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6922344,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26022747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7587802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007017652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010321604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75327146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200182845","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1188","title":"Not So Dangerous Liaisons: A Clinical Perspective on Interdisciplinarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Space (punctuation); Quality (philosophy); Legal education; Engineering ethics; Narrative; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Public relations; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.10539369464726837,"score_gpt":0.5174340682983596,"score_spread":0.4120403736510912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200182845","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12360858,0.000017790333,0.000111496025,0.5276398,0.000811508,0.00006773814,0.0000039861197,0.000013518329,0.34772557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97410744,0.000041588697,0.00015780906,0.017063484,0.007989044,8.9585757e-7,2.708965e-7,0.000004831986,0.0006346221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987181,0.00048509912,0.0003237118,0.00008112925,0.00024892626,0.00014303048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986374,0.00043830453,0.00034789724,0.00005047738,0.00042023478,0.000105707884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00202019,0.000059109767,0.00017774696,0.00008614382,0.0010908749,0.00024276903,0.00012936567,0.00011166902,0.000035705005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018848117,0.000051013645,0.000101600024,0.00016602727,0.000549091,0.00037717822,0.000025831816,0.0005675583,0.000014066205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046071582,0.00013102582,0.00010301184,0.0000015868865,0.000020712094,7.245004e-7,0.077145986,8.4211614e-8,0.0000035191288,0.9109816,0.0045046913,0.0070610037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004369799,0.0002599216,0.005899251,0.000013931102,0.000026738018,0.000004888471,0.028076278,0.0000016902851,0.0000046063105,0.06790938,0.8972747,0.000091640206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008771956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021076512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001676091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084500824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203974900","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1187","title":"Poverty Law, Access to Justice, and Ethical Lawyering: Celebrating 40 Years of Clinical Education at Osgoode Hall Law School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Legal education; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10444906302504327,"score_gpt":0.5056466276795187,"score_spread":0.4011975646544755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203974900","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3263685,0.000033322725,0.000052248663,0.200503,0.000961362,0.00013972106,0.000006709652,0.000012717936,0.4719224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94061685,0.000047663892,0.00059518975,0.054374076,0.0039508888,0.0000016284869,0.000001033735,0.000007378902,0.00040527407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839276,0.00042799956,0.00058245193,0.000107678985,0.000324577,0.00016451419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982161,0.0005401941,0.000519275,0.00006572001,0.00039940566,0.0002593296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021638053,0.00006951629,0.00024525943,0.00006564936,0.0006950055,0.00028919688,0.00017309168,0.00023643543,0.00005272592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024881726,0.00006847591,0.000068027526,0.00020172313,0.00036634284,0.0005934511,0.00006989963,0.00063905376,0.0000052280734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037244856,0.000068401976,0.0003925685,0.000026949925,0.000015410107,2.4904446e-7,0.008746782,8.3690026e-7,0.00008230074,0.98130816,0.005443609,0.003877474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044953686,0.00012564723,0.016513702,0.000047576475,0.00009620783,0.000007215121,0.0035144996,0.000006988697,0.000049260318,0.049025215,0.9300055,0.00015868382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04549732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019192336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074381285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011385492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204575813","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1014","title":"The Challenge of Defining Unmet Legal Need","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.034148207418026696,"score_gpt":0.2634158331042794,"score_spread":0.2292676256862527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204575813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40909055,0.0047287866,0.000258701,0.010383189,0.0011700874,0.00010698777,0.00006303497,0.000008094438,0.57419056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99660033,0.0006036102,0.000033989974,0.0004863253,0.0021465912,3.7320356e-7,5.2079616e-7,0.000011827245,0.0001164409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865067,0.000016333082,0.0009751431,0.00008437826,0.00003873474,0.00023471453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986769,0.0000948913,0.001032407,0.00007611207,0.000049189897,0.000070507456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018232836,0.00007292618,0.00043758214,0.00011527572,0.00029008315,0.00006460721,0.0001592663,0.00010114731,0.000008312371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006647472,0.00007337398,0.00017477365,0.00007263803,0.00024535993,0.00017731322,0.000030065525,0.00015280774,0.000011622525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003168863,0.000021884403,0.00092243304,0.00001087592,0.00006390778,0.0000020827686,0.0020199418,8.165059e-7,0.0000054685393,0.9955046,0.00025509467,0.0011611874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013616751,0.00028120654,0.008010285,0.000023391365,0.00001648358,0.000026816997,0.0016370285,0.000017709892,0.000054599135,0.5877859,0.40054834,0.00023657914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003718298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005469885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58750975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007741601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046803874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5620979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212337182","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1008","title":"Book Review: The First Women Lawyers: A Comparative Study of Gender, Law and the Legal Professions, by Mary Jane Mossman; The Ursula Franklin Reader: Pacifism as a Map, by Ursula M. Franklin","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.039906791484003924,"score_gpt":0.39661287441849274,"score_spread":0.3567060829344888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212337182","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03017383,0.052463345,0.0000044383437,0.8754574,0.0002451539,0.0012141047,0.00003391506,0.000012507221,0.0403953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83627456,0.0077576227,0.000006088177,0.15240528,0.0009039596,0.00002963461,0.0000033297524,0.000007863785,0.002611655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969886,0.0013780493,0.0006189488,0.00012978366,0.0006098689,0.00027474394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802065,0.0006559853,0.00077423494,0.00015518231,0.00029447756,0.00009949284],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00294765,0.00015454795,0.0004301619,0.000037149654,0.0026789815,0.00025946752,0.00037282665,0.0001054338,0.0000905171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019883063,0.00007991877,0.0000944859,0.00035304984,0.0012041546,0.00061801926,0.000039721257,0.0008067311,0.0000033027127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011768173,0.0003190934,0.000015657955,0.00001820752,0.00010248051,0.0000011896844,0.28511792,1.1240318e-7,0.0000069501148,0.20621319,0.5079044,0.00018308402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011492555,0.0001659886,0.00017793207,0.00005395019,0.00009326346,0.000008199939,0.12497334,0.0000014958042,0.0000033359986,0.0057125385,0.8675714,0.00008926328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01257952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056246074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8061007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008095544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046999776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212459771","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1051","title":"Social Welfare Entitlements and the Role of Law: Guaranteeing Equality in Denmark and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Social Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Social equality; Law","score_opus":0.02519802207930273,"score_gpt":0.34430510548822973,"score_spread":0.319107083408927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212459771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.868579,0.00051701744,3.8319993e-7,0.041477565,0.00008291861,0.0000987265,0.0000118194785,0.0000022593265,0.08923036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99677473,0.00066419935,0.0000032516223,0.0010454863,0.001390189,0.0000011352721,1.9971642e-7,0.0000043157333,0.00011649067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987942,0.000261716,0.00032684702,0.000065568405,0.00031355297,0.00023808994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950194,0.00008534818,0.000254378,0.000023301527,0.00008363744,0.00005137676],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009008513,0.000081428785,0.00031255392,0.000037807764,0.0014188237,0.000044501176,0.000095375566,0.00008221604,0.0000057571024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007488324,0.000056424167,0.000060611925,0.0000932374,0.0010827569,0.0001361741,0.000058268237,0.00015982996,6.20328e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006322106,0.0000151387,0.0035846224,0.000013504793,0.00005331285,0.0000028215622,0.066115215,4.358696e-8,0.00000940309,0.92818624,0.00007289841,0.00188355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056584245,0.000081959704,0.086856686,0.000061631516,0.00014706953,0.000015805696,0.18169896,0.000003626379,0.000044842407,0.5009906,0.22405946,0.00038089664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9215125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88621294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42719564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089761845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023593959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215341176","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1054","title":"Into the Wasteland: Applying Equality Principles to Medical Inadmissibility in Canadian Immigration Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04223248256360731,"score_gpt":0.37202400221443904,"score_spread":0.32979151965083175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215341176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80989957,0.00017547456,0.000018406927,0.0896067,0.00017041288,0.00021827102,0.0000021191545,0.000006627299,0.09990241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917549,0.0000777642,0.0000100679035,0.0054726615,0.0025799929,0.0000043123773,3.4479982e-7,0.0000040421714,0.00009591387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983503,0.00032246628,0.00041203867,0.00008894671,0.0005148288,0.00031142402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903756,0.00008582965,0.00014819922,0.000048586673,0.00013369622,0.00054613623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035820764,0.00006976789,0.00020626755,0.00007194812,0.0010441961,0.00013605789,0.00021283532,0.0001402222,0.00002881035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066988915,0.00004886913,0.00005298171,0.00027820448,0.0002743508,0.00024384994,0.000028643488,0.0002333988,0.0000018688772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021830367,0.000021214928,0.0049705394,0.000013558592,0.000008048805,0.000011757312,0.10500636,0.0000010983074,0.000008664201,0.8839275,0.000071182374,0.0059382007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027403294,0.0000521029,0.007982,0.0000551495,0.000007999854,0.000008212455,0.01490758,0.00000710374,0.000008139767,0.032588333,0.943993,0.00011638271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9894084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9439218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003730083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002321473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8031218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215768430","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1004","title":"A Tale of Marginalization: Comparing Workers with Disabilities in Canada and the United States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Political science; Economic growth; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09050568518810084,"score_gpt":0.37073970418241936,"score_spread":0.28023401899431855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215768430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98407984,0.000058877173,0.0000037540221,0.011367061,0.000018820121,0.000071644325,0.0000014559477,0.0000012114118,0.004397312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912965,0.00013998964,0.000008248395,0.0005402228,0.00014049509,5.320942e-7,6.3336813e-7,0.0000016714253,0.000038532482],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924976,0.00015588648,0.00020492898,0.000039225935,0.00023023078,0.0001199883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996385,0.00009811091,0.00012818296,0.000026580094,0.000064669155,0.00004394563],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004271823,0.000046404166,0.00017384131,0.000029864783,0.00021729771,0.00003592312,0.00006393263,0.000016497723,0.00000489729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004124006,0.000029479876,0.000020229329,0.00014965748,0.00072253373,0.000082328,0.000008254268,0.000061845356,1.4481456e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024462884,0.00004742373,0.5279824,0.000031698783,0.000027516837,0.0000012774182,0.13660336,0.000114594324,9.594904e-7,0.33421233,0.0002445078,0.0004892726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038920173,0.0002447064,0.5131479,0.00016526025,0.000062950545,0.0000046744976,0.4009028,0.00009869549,0.000010484481,0.07224951,0.009007526,0.00021349436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9654276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9445592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26429948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018716008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044158625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26622057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221584915","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1212","title":"Community Campaigns for the Right to Housing: Lessons from the R2H Coalition of Ontario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Variety (cybernetics); Community organizing; Public administration; Political science; Work (physics); Public relations; Community organization; Affordable housing; Public housing; Sociology; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.22800561846139725,"score_gpt":0.46652266542694615,"score_spread":0.2385170469655489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221584915","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3183259,0.00002808031,0.0004298398,0.6453961,0.00048581586,0.00017799578,0.0000462608,0.000004480342,0.035105508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886864,0.0000052178243,0.00017532325,0.008545428,0.0020217998,0.0000024207095,0.0000022174254,0.000002993856,0.0005582445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912715,0.0003620696,0.00019566939,0.000025422945,0.00019777364,0.00009188607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984619,0.00068075984,0.0002640041,0.0000642582,0.00046555794,0.00006351649],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019238268,0.000038161044,0.000098986544,0.00002355999,0.0015493901,0.00013227855,0.00019283884,0.00004697966,0.000023848412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006524717,0.00002286134,0.000053321055,0.00014155816,0.00023447369,0.0002482152,0.000018531933,0.0003138077,8.9706276e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002529141,0.000049007893,0.00013726036,8.9980836e-7,0.000024499876,5.656735e-8,0.3879555,0.0000013693369,0.000014581747,0.5894434,0.021905253,0.0004428981],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020333749,0.00004209222,0.0027271148,0.0000061934925,0.000038363458,5.456923e-7,0.05878624,4.5177404e-7,0.000018844628,0.045189008,0.89295614,0.000031656928],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7092051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5838965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8710509,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022061398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002855722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217921825","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1035","title":"Book Review: A Note Concerning: \"When Old Meets New\": Civil Remedies in the Criminal Context, a Paper by J. P. Laporte, D. Sean McGarrity and Jamie Nelson","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Criminology; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03868620263210288,"score_gpt":0.26764720297669015,"score_spread":0.22896100034458727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217921825","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04642977,0.66543627,0.000071698916,0.08534478,0.0008703425,0.00074321043,0.0001739006,0.000018292689,0.20091176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86225283,0.046576783,0.00002192989,0.08817768,0.0016620288,0.0000051764628,0.0000027324766,0.000023513794,0.0012773349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99832696,0.00010795307,0.0010050448,0.00019785503,0.00006975925,0.00029244373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876875,0.000083420004,0.000860634,0.00011061192,0.00004361734,0.0001329816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015154264,0.00015464007,0.00078829343,0.00008321323,0.00025286374,0.00011590497,0.00016995319,0.0001347703,0.00012921967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000196486,0.0001517476,0.00015273939,0.00006425854,0.00028120022,0.00040228988,0.000025234518,0.0002946099,0.0000065025224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032554264,0.00005400059,0.0017151103,0.00016282548,0.000070471266,0.000012771357,0.014439278,2.022769e-7,0.000010911556,0.57220274,0.41038275,0.0009163506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010532367,0.00010249066,0.0011213049,0.00012423168,0.000028369632,0.00004690637,0.0004780633,0.0000036669069,0.000005637615,0.035022136,0.9618376,0.00017635997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012539735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022691954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8158231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000121273355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011353376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99403584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224330119","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1022","title":"Independent Child Legal Representation: A Concept in the Making","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032219969325136384,"score_gpt":0.37999114699862024,"score_spread":0.34777117767348387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224330119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25582555,0.00035507238,0.00004465144,0.2807211,0.00023946624,0.00014980946,0.0000027639114,0.000010174894,0.46265143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876719,0.00007173218,0.000019955321,0.0054595154,0.006606762,7.887347e-7,2.0583e-7,0.000002719656,0.00016641323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905044,0.0001860029,0.00022513041,0.000051082978,0.0003483837,0.00013893466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996853,0.000036177666,0.00016495536,0.00003230902,0.000054898086,0.000026393333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000687062,0.000044775385,0.00010925323,0.00005819921,0.0005830722,0.00014702634,0.00012477582,0.000060809787,0.000028957402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035258523,0.00003381473,0.00007020043,0.00012855508,0.00018320727,0.0003308539,0.000013843619,0.00020984125,0.0000010643868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015930396,0.000034216668,0.0002823984,0.0000012374217,0.000009354527,0.000008546523,0.16217563,0.000004752995,0.0000054890597,0.8225658,0.0006009112,0.014295737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055722287,0.000040860938,0.015849262,0.000017469352,0.000012758089,0.00003934626,0.017282184,0.000004918408,0.0000067308843,0.0028524327,0.96327394,0.00006285879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005502003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051470893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96267307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007398243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012189456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8317419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226225805","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1018","title":"Legalized Age Discrimination","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.20657304417274822,"score_gpt":0.4728501307609806,"score_spread":0.26627708658823235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226225805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6595649,0.00009368388,0.000029683606,0.06208586,0.00020116413,0.00010463746,0.0000027325555,0.000013340513,0.27790397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992987,0.00014569523,0.00008114733,0.0014982373,0.004192666,8.4793595e-7,5.356478e-7,0.0000041854846,0.0010896839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906796,0.00014343493,0.00023534025,0.000054493663,0.00032866077,0.00017008871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963033,0.000023229233,0.00014711327,0.00003117146,0.000078584846,0.00008959706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065483217,0.000054476786,0.0001425508,0.000042744065,0.0005193716,0.00010467294,0.00009540992,0.000058584414,0.000045748737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006905949,0.000046167508,0.000096341064,0.00006352015,0.00033875438,0.00031217074,0.000014909397,0.00008436784,0.00000346911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018382014,0.00009229024,0.00035926164,0.00001049615,0.000016424177,0.0000018840393,0.07186006,4.3060564e-7,0.00011677588,0.9158119,0.0016975249,0.010014575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012098465,0.00013098922,0.015825976,0.000023708193,0.00006292382,0.0000032196658,0.01307082,0.0000025495033,0.00012043637,0.07190139,0.89745903,0.00018909755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006508495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047754264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89576155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018007804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012842339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9838941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228125395","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1311","title":"Does Community Legal Education Work? Educating English Language Students about Consumer Contracts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal profession; Legal education; Legal service; Public relations; Legal advice; Legal research; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.031500144782425334,"score_gpt":0.44243159157489337,"score_spread":0.410931446792468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228125395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8309021,0.00006275871,0.0000024507876,0.025890494,0.0020136924,0.000084780775,0.0000036445517,0.000013660242,0.14102642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781645,0.00004123181,0.00013012362,0.007775712,0.011498049,0.0000026089706,0.000002375949,0.0000074148707,0.0023780107],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998487,0.00060134433,0.00032953423,0.000056903085,0.00033117857,0.00019403711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806666,0.00027566042,0.00046827254,0.00007813628,0.0009848266,0.00012646402],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016066586,0.000076938326,0.00015414157,0.00010691043,0.0019347965,0.00058797235,0.0002477724,0.00009420656,0.00010679888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017309064,0.000058157493,0.00005144309,0.00029261404,0.000554882,0.0009842166,0.000030173647,0.0006331912,0.000007935103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002664383,0.00046220227,0.0031693808,0.0000084748235,0.000049425707,5.071572e-7,0.610489,1.3767125e-8,0.000052430507,0.35892075,0.008481999,0.01833917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002870946,0.000037273152,0.02154233,0.000038328282,0.000035681758,0.0000024164713,0.18567745,3.327572e-8,0.00003940821,0.0020072577,0.79022896,0.00010377877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045766644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005391518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7817469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013999605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024286988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99936455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231233859","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1044","title":"Criminalizing Poverty: The Criminal Law Power and the Safe Streets Act","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Power (physics); Poverty; Sociology","score_opus":0.046108332090115035,"score_gpt":0.28150578334901044,"score_spread":0.2353974512588954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231233859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22524565,0.0015690589,0.000024551236,0.16661112,0.0003190715,0.00014883354,0.0000014507856,0.000016148113,0.6060641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9638045,0.00009232829,0.000008000421,0.033201337,0.0026115149,8.3178764e-7,1.3932589e-7,0.0000066046046,0.00027477718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993633,0.000022854012,0.00021030515,0.000061303705,0.0001977454,0.00014450436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953866,0.000047323803,0.00024495562,0.00005346894,0.000106253414,0.000009349365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026131884,0.00009468605,0.00018388848,0.000037952286,0.0009365698,0.00032587178,0.000117488846,0.000029052586,0.00005843098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028278771,0.000048794253,0.00009620795,0.00007356204,0.00039247703,0.0004065334,0.000078502395,0.00013047412,0.0000060421353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005198615,0.000015118167,0.00013799062,0.000021405822,0.00004391652,0.0000029279304,0.0026218586,7.936842e-7,0.000008245649,0.9855242,0.008153844,0.0034177161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026809643,0.000034595698,0.041940894,0.000058725032,0.00030335385,0.000053092746,0.0073469314,0.00024954122,0.0000050869166,0.07589323,0.87120086,0.00023270685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008868219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012935558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90963095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011514313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000064720825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7203433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2239109778","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1017","title":"Failing to Achieve Equality: Disability Rights in Australia, Canada, and the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.060404405439880765,"score_gpt":0.39144367717276607,"score_spread":0.3310392717328853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2239109778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8869643,0.0000045671677,0.000005054431,0.10604255,0.000044795113,0.00007113417,0.000009124817,0.0000026758496,0.0068557807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993852,0.000012870328,0.000023680785,0.0049398574,0.0006960267,8.177128e-7,0.0000010798593,0.0000019752285,0.0004716712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986324,0.0004882359,0.00031419445,0.00006502828,0.0003019547,0.00019820927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945027,0.00018299221,0.000113831105,0.000036949263,0.00008077372,0.00013516578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016654738,0.000062278144,0.00018151022,0.000040508232,0.00047627254,0.000109849694,0.00010986974,0.000048050413,0.000015034586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001033867,0.00004283305,0.00003699679,0.00017168467,0.00063911243,0.00017303698,0.000024171606,0.00014696173,5.281553e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060929742,0.000024546782,0.00032227152,0.0000051275642,0.0000089614305,7.7082575e-7,0.093848415,0.000009996605,0.0000010396388,0.9046358,0.00020070322,0.00088144635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019588666,0.00006533281,0.021271229,0.000028816165,0.00003463847,0.00000229445,0.024489744,0.00002251328,0.000016615231,0.3472352,0.60464215,0.00023257874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99254715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60444146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022461567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018327545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36631516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254561243","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1011","title":"DNA, Discrimination and the Definition of Family Class: M.A.O. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Citizenship; Family reunification; Immigration law; Political science; Refugee; Charter; Kinship; Family law; Law; Ethnic group; Contradiction","score_opus":0.03395841325068359,"score_gpt":0.3068113461500742,"score_spread":0.2728529328993906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254561243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467408,0.00018426252,0.00003951016,0.011916697,0.00008199932,0.000058694746,0.000008578556,0.0000013728295,0.040968094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828917,0.0003317842,0.00002888243,0.0007831669,0.00050414953,3.1530146e-7,8.1153985e-7,0.0000026475254,0.000059094913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999196,0.000100249614,0.00030209825,0.000041369243,0.00026586436,0.00009442387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992529,0.00017608448,0.00032974183,0.000022965585,0.00017104788,0.000047247042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009714765,0.000047105954,0.00015915865,0.00004877537,0.0003236709,0.000029094914,0.000038893297,0.00005665835,0.0000022008494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006121891,0.000034547495,0.00003835973,0.00006798838,0.00056839635,0.00010057216,0.00001107063,0.00007378953,2.0796152e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010150238,0.000009562065,0.0005194749,0.000020019184,0.000021105403,9.2912825e-7,0.026030093,2.8146012e-8,0.00036256592,0.9685581,0.00024242852,0.004134202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056538247,0.00046301674,0.57208973,0.00016864098,0.00034869506,0.000035322308,0.10111316,0.000011183445,0.0007105776,0.2518351,0.06723655,0.0003341931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.269455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3609291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71672297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042314066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024743922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7354098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298629448","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1226","title":"Disability Disclosure in the Digital Age: Why the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario Should Reform its Approach to Anonymized Decisions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Anonymity; Order (exchange); Political science; Human rights; Test (biology); Psychology; Law; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.1287281627626233,"score_gpt":0.3948650315556137,"score_spread":0.26613686879299037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298629448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70314,0.0000031832142,0.000020106232,0.031228747,0.00004743787,0.0001555981,0.000023213199,0.0000030993633,0.2653786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976609,0.00000224429,0.000014074561,0.0008870982,0.00055880466,0.0000031182965,0.0000011766984,0.0000033331582,0.000869273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983049,0.0003232807,0.0004499581,0.000090804046,0.0006172688,0.00021379201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992809,0.00021430034,0.00019725919,0.00009919935,0.00011188382,0.00009643411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018486077,0.000085794585,0.00024955155,0.000040690862,0.00086153223,0.00018131727,0.00041659814,0.00008850055,0.000022008537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021116856,0.000035526416,0.00017382551,0.00018460152,0.0007440204,0.00036306406,0.000047704,0.00018166087,0.0000011260096],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045128505,0.0002374707,0.0005777672,0.0000023707162,0.000013285344,9.416893e-7,0.084451795,8.7193946e-8,0.000013272591,0.91330564,0.00036402835,0.0009881839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021704354,0.00018782078,0.1578801,0.000059524853,0.00005245831,0.0000049516307,0.011430689,1.773257e-7,0.000025538433,0.4159161,0.41205856,0.00021364763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.080576055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31540304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49738958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040987332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021628042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92554647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298982224","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1227","title":"Book Review: The Healing Journey: Intimate Partner Abuse and Its Implications in the Labour Market, by Linda DeRiviere","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05312465136043509,"score_gpt":0.4357176441346551,"score_spread":0.38259299277422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298982224","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05580561,0.08956009,0.0000069743746,0.8495673,0.00010028505,0.00042909486,0.000042793094,0.0000071412787,0.0044807014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26634023,0.44757876,0.0000061274864,0.27642283,0.0024602711,0.000052066225,0.0000011413408,0.000021760265,0.007116829],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984471,0.0005840286,0.00049499475,0.00007086593,0.00013726014,0.00026570386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894494,0.00041210937,0.00037003309,0.00007506148,0.00014176982,0.000056113997],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013975769,0.00009702815,0.00025954653,0.000033542303,0.0013045452,0.000018556428,0.00014335406,0.00006800509,0.000060945476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012439997,0.000037655773,0.00005839916,0.00009035398,0.00010493152,0.00016399175,0.00005113335,0.00034931515,0.0000037675654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002205598,0.00002595521,0.0029028014,0.00022266155,0.000048596772,0.0000014417018,0.013962172,7.1935355e-9,0.000047603105,0.056288294,0.9239785,0.002499875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048218106,0.000026776495,0.019706113,0.0005619009,0.000032509266,0.000007842471,0.0006687809,1.8018129e-7,0.0000017511361,0.0021950342,0.9762599,0.00005706395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017814418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017687603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5731445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052626267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008952191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299216227","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Women’s Rights to Social Security and Social Protection, edited by Beth Goldblatt & Lucie Lamarche","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020987411187825513,"score_gpt":0.3348572030205768,"score_spread":0.3138697918327513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299216227","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11136634,0.010268898,0.000024574316,0.85681,0.00079475594,0.0010632855,0.00024195715,0.0000950545,0.01933515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.764376,0.023036085,0.000020319067,0.13589601,0.06708327,0.00011386395,0.0000031783757,0.000063075786,0.009408219],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997402,0.00051394675,0.00055089436,0.0002092085,0.00064281846,0.000681141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987774,0.000083749714,0.00045888763,0.000048603233,0.00036756854,0.00026381714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014301263,0.0002251458,0.00064885075,0.00011769592,0.0038452412,0.000098785626,0.00021310606,0.00032044397,0.000053653926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021446632,0.00015042632,0.0002052535,0.0002873018,0.0013499403,0.00047365765,0.00010513928,0.00035413803,0.0000062471117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113053145,0.00010008237,0.000016677606,0.000169294,0.0002101984,0.0000043261557,0.21621767,2.5139983e-9,0.00023270377,0.095330566,0.67983437,0.0077710813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075641903,0.00013661166,0.00048433483,0.00009595394,0.000049996914,0.000003913574,0.002921831,3.3540804e-8,0.000035829384,0.041501615,0.9537716,0.00024189001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005162086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007991973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72091395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004984185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032289678,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301007804","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1225","title":"Socioeconomic Rights Adjudication in Canada: Can the Minimum Core Help in Adjudicating the Rights to Life and Security of the Person under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Charter; Adjudication; Human rights; Justiciability; Political science; Social rights; Obligation; Right to health; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Core (optical fiber); Law and economics; Law; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.025416866768160604,"score_gpt":0.27763242342667305,"score_spread":0.2522155566585124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301007804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84902835,0.00020230206,9.943723e-8,0.14945889,0.00007285709,0.0002152571,0.000026871752,7.8549493e-7,0.0009945793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979827,0.000044137872,0.000002136254,0.0014530277,0.0004683211,0.00000459069,1.3739029e-7,0.0000031513612,0.00004180416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873203,0.0003265539,0.0003270122,0.00009854387,0.00025976475,0.00025609625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897844,0.00033740982,0.0003741607,0.000075697564,0.000109504464,0.00012480885],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075640314,0.00010024073,0.00025165753,0.000037110596,0.0016670537,0.000034368746,0.00027428733,0.00008373425,0.000008959962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007761313,0.00003775016,0.00005215181,0.0001086384,0.0012889166,0.00009845807,0.000042376305,0.00021817858,1.9651159e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003513973,0.000026143736,0.033552215,0.000017237082,0.00014866373,0.0000017776888,0.5784915,0.0000017515177,0.00014076525,0.38337067,0.0036477929,0.000566368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081749546,0.00003838219,0.89259785,0.00009315197,0.00004533772,0.0000032403068,0.045691032,0.000009857681,0.000054930882,0.05292713,0.007565059,0.00015650131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8590457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007471589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010551194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301640391","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1223","title":"Zoning Out Discrimination: Working Towards Housing Equality in Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zoning; Legislation; Fair Housing Act; Government (linguistics); Business; Code of practice; Political science; Housing discrimination; Local government; Public administration; Law; Civil rights; Engineering","score_opus":0.16208210230751194,"score_gpt":0.4056902367806582,"score_spread":0.24360813447314625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301640391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5873961,0.000014867201,0.00039381342,0.034586087,0.00037420215,0.000058285837,0.0000014162441,0.000012844191,0.37716243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99597996,0.000022434431,0.00009853921,0.0010580848,0.0011468851,6.2028613e-7,2.2631902e-7,0.0000055757514,0.0016876686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862355,0.0002744785,0.00037642557,0.00008322295,0.00039430428,0.0002480121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945086,0.00005890011,0.00025021305,0.000037121885,0.00010870412,0.000094201176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001655136,0.00007414424,0.00020437883,0.00010683658,0.00046251583,0.0001420286,0.00012628754,0.00009329957,0.000046098834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014770325,0.000055701927,0.00008803353,0.00008679988,0.00031257913,0.00047548077,0.00003391393,0.00014915327,0.0000021966146],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014734238,0.000029003986,0.0024792706,0.0000040613013,0.0000073447663,0.0000032194573,0.16013108,9.078883e-8,0.000040361814,0.81316257,0.000033839322,0.024094421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002790826,0.00013081191,0.15586922,0.0005142332,0.000065281885,0.0000050848303,0.032078426,0.0000010127716,0.00013346523,0.36572465,0.44213924,0.0005477398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18917339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66997665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48080325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006003081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000594347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.816226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301725652","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1222","title":"The Cost of Uncertainty: Navigating the Boundary Between Legal Information and Legal Services in the Access to Justice Sector","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Disadvantaged; CLARITY; Business; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.048241454563298536,"score_gpt":0.4264439621798989,"score_spread":0.37820250761660035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301725652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5041536,0.00003195003,0.000024692288,0.48330766,0.0001708092,0.00014600542,0.0000137959305,0.0000024511442,0.012149017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98947984,0.000070003145,0.000010636917,0.008789536,0.0016025252,0.0000034532347,6.383505e-7,0.0000020539308,0.00004131027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989033,0.0002967771,0.00033221694,0.000032862044,0.0003002194,0.00013462674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982758,0.00096645794,0.0004026026,0.000047527174,0.00026822404,0.000039381677],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021504688,0.0000491188,0.00009185309,0.000038008762,0.0015189967,0.0010057645,0.00030611813,0.000043731172,0.0000051677757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047062684,0.000021935779,0.000026587288,0.00032256418,0.00032409522,0.0024036346,0.000036290454,0.0002882685,9.127013e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003541966,0.000013597027,0.001049599,0.000020635802,0.000022819688,3.7791898e-7,0.14255579,0.0000016995335,0.000022075224,0.7982371,0.0012462627,0.056794655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022906935,0.00003086962,0.023314936,0.00004293259,0.00003123661,0.0000046443665,0.053769153,0.0000017698858,0.000007605786,0.0050068405,0.9175141,0.000046878547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041851416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012702838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006135544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078286685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302374884","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1224","title":"Government Efforts to Address Bullying in Canada: Any Place for Children’s Rights?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Education Discipline and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislation; Child rights; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Human rights; Government (linguistics); International human rights law; Public administration; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028811600257103408,"score_gpt":0.3489308298829831,"score_spread":0.3201192296258797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302374884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95064485,0.000020019712,0.000019243913,0.042421296,0.00017116028,0.00013207195,0.00004027437,0.000001869666,0.006549192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99590945,0.00002251743,0.00004023617,0.0015206729,0.0019825704,0.0000039229517,2.5450282e-7,0.000003450276,0.00051694276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908125,0.00007075941,0.00025553536,0.00006629508,0.0003163441,0.00020982017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995048,0.00009848198,0.0001588026,0.000032226453,0.000069520305,0.00013619047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006243141,0.000053708914,0.00015072495,0.000025378771,0.0003805189,0.000027692515,0.00010297139,0.00003723328,0.000024956613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008877494,0.000037163496,0.000043034797,0.000064424414,0.00005329725,0.0001519878,0.000014210716,0.000049669714,4.5117034e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009133148,0.00008794943,0.023561567,0.000013498882,0.000038678005,0.0000022677764,0.043534968,0.0000019008304,0.0000797024,0.902265,0.026236907,0.004086245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002221531,0.00015552405,0.3223857,0.00014685842,0.000032065007,0.0000045535694,0.012430499,5.9100955e-7,0.0003916526,0.019499106,0.64236385,0.00036807932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87662446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9660063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009685072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017350068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30778274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344325849","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1020","title":"Goliath Arisen: Taking Aim at the Health Care Regime in Auton","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029603809876643825,"score_gpt":0.37182756326721056,"score_spread":0.3422237533905667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344325849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34435672,0.007025685,0.000006831918,0.32965022,0.00042053216,0.0002526355,0.000009458923,0.000022719221,0.31825522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857404,0.00029624443,0.000012103169,0.0059633837,0.0074034543,9.349548e-7,3.0848426e-7,0.0000071215295,0.0005760293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986638,0.00023381044,0.00035876216,0.0000961581,0.00034822072,0.00029925248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917555,0.000043773514,0.0005215768,0.000054019074,0.000104576706,0.00010053466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011003084,0.0000764852,0.00025082869,0.000059510174,0.0012330398,0.00010788474,0.00015754865,0.00009696266,0.000014828013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010825644,0.00005404936,0.00008366807,0.00019007252,0.00025075162,0.0002551674,0.00003623688,0.00023813249,0.0000036583272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041527994,0.00003305874,0.0007534016,0.000054320248,0.00001564182,0.000006770766,0.4226002,0.0000057117427,0.00001106382,0.54543996,0.005894574,0.025143724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054317823,0.00008505769,0.0037617409,0.00007190435,0.000009244404,0.000008800529,0.025246339,0.0000013322784,0.000010496441,0.003533083,0.9666204,0.00010841712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09455018,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1189745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96072584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060610764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087121874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94836694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344469281","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1032","title":"Decisions Adverse to a Household - Protecting Social Housing Tenants under the Social Housing Reform Act and the Tenant Protection Act","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Korean Urban and Social Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Public housing; Business; Fair Housing Act; Economic growth; Political science; Law; Civil rights; Economics","score_opus":0.05366660004800709,"score_gpt":0.29343295371952666,"score_spread":0.23976635367151955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344469281","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9735197,0.000025533353,0.00017361922,0.019009247,0.00013346081,0.00053502404,0.0000048523634,0.000020452004,0.0065781153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99638706,0.000043062562,0.0000789334,0.002070881,0.0012890445,0.0000104315795,9.514498e-8,0.000024069443,0.00009644013],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820566,0.00035893172,0.0003834291,0.00016449693,0.00047158156,0.00041589394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993496,0.00009254029,0.00037737982,0.000060102753,0.00003340978,0.000086954926],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015361467,0.00018748597,0.00034388588,0.000047852776,0.006288419,0.00014543122,0.00015585191,0.00012934579,0.0000067815135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020128854,0.000082711646,0.00019312525,0.00029960013,0.00087849464,0.00025156586,0.0001581663,0.0005228224,0.0000025272266],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028068363,0.00062066666,0.004614647,0.00007165628,0.00085871515,0.00006627718,0.5297557,0.0001591467,0.0053708144,0.16027005,0.0029755621,0.29242992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017253578,0.0011172277,0.52561665,0.00032234867,0.0009102081,0.0004258768,0.21870866,0.000090730406,0.0009605618,0.10256371,0.12970392,0.0023265406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048401714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001649318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.521002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005567138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008033303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99500525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519823424","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1007","title":"To Serve Some and Protect Fewer: The Toronto Police Services' Policy on Non-Status Victims and Witnesses of Crimes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.014225763750560526,"score_gpt":0.3414094428253404,"score_spread":0.3271836790747799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519823424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9755709,0.0004445652,0.0000076169094,0.014184859,0.000060718612,0.00014627977,0.000008855412,0.000007538258,0.00956867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911716,0.0013090767,0.000031729953,0.0048894407,0.0024671648,0.0000020965156,2.8089633e-7,0.0000065938284,0.000122028956],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998889,0.000120819495,0.0002801455,0.000116336065,0.0003105115,0.00028314823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992006,0.00008398144,0.00023941066,0.00007658877,0.00020894989,0.00019048722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000369879,0.0001242465,0.00030526175,0.00013019724,0.0008829008,0.00015695831,0.00014272415,0.00008803113,0.0000066885646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004311514,0.000089493406,0.00009551559,0.0002724076,0.00022077597,0.0003846172,0.000035395155,0.00013698784,6.083529e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035162922,0.00022778331,0.0004632543,0.00014592175,0.00018864113,0.000004427317,0.63001317,0.000012576116,0.0011098658,0.28863654,0.00028558154,0.0785606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012721168,0.0021902125,0.05080465,0.00023762144,0.00071275746,0.00004123676,0.8903236,0.000022812204,0.000513458,0.014164895,0.039192352,0.0005243037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53140724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094185345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43722185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011891923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032645694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92234343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519902374","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1036","title":"The Coroner's Inquest as an Equality Rights Mechanism: A Case Study of the May-Iles Coroner's Inquest into Domestic Violence in Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inquest; Coroner; Law; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention; Poison control","score_opus":0.03732909370354272,"score_gpt":0.3631088834145982,"score_spread":0.3257797897110555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519902374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99773407,0.00008553421,0.000003940008,0.0004937403,0.00019336355,0.00034535813,0.0000022718261,0.000006987408,0.0011347355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991036,0.000014283345,0.000081171245,0.00035818116,0.0003337116,0.0000044617923,8.356327e-7,0.000012980582,0.000090768015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979713,0.00056618865,0.0006746859,0.00013968808,0.0004231192,0.00022503076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987999,0.00016590487,0.00048615006,0.0002046783,0.0002165164,0.00012682994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010752234,0.00016320037,0.00042118703,0.00008214536,0.00052804034,0.00005328647,0.00015337375,0.00010981801,0.000012712514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001959396,0.0000955802,0.00006772569,0.00015292932,0.00037120574,0.00016898316,0.000053605425,0.0004794117,0.0000012251892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062149216,0.0020901868,0.059081823,0.00009789668,0.00025980794,0.0020948518,0.24097662,0.000010608306,0.0008859216,0.6926317,0.000034255492,0.0012148402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015259603,0.011706281,0.3425231,0.0010501657,0.0011655374,0.022636812,0.12759922,0.00004579021,0.0033289725,0.46970463,0.003995038,0.0009848293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45700496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5289722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28344128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031789925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063368725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5466109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521839976","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1038","title":"The Reality beneath the Rhetoric: Probing the Discourses Surrounding the Safe Third Country Agreement","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.030307982592253438,"score_gpt":0.3460833871486099,"score_spread":0.3157754045563565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521839976","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2561366,0.002047444,0.000051981642,0.37596858,0.0016271881,0.0005828274,0.000024936337,0.000015783737,0.36354464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916972,0.0017209545,0.000004295246,0.0032883196,0.0024528974,0.0000028563886,4.3948748e-7,0.000005726987,0.0008273177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755824,0.0009199056,0.00033693042,0.00008382811,0.0006989617,0.0004021522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874336,0.0005003049,0.00038799486,0.00013943267,0.00016073885,0.0000681721],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050190752,0.00011483077,0.0001706033,0.000014091079,0.0076724384,0.00063116464,0.00053109677,0.00008057179,0.0000049391747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003203907,0.00004488342,0.00015418144,0.00021747712,0.001145405,0.00020958835,0.000051630665,0.00043018124,0.0000013012875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010161255,0.000019791481,0.0001683919,0.000002871867,0.00004707342,0.0000012858311,0.048879832,0.000005444445,0.0000035339408,0.9470363,0.0032710247,0.0005542816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019364116,0.00003681157,0.001545283,0.00001744363,0.00006950317,0.000012748248,0.077406526,0.000009539479,0.000001933863,0.09343863,0.8271732,0.000094755305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012581769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027728092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8535977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023119118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005172597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521906274","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1052","title":"Legal Ethics and Moral Dilemmas: Strategizing around Race in the Provision of Client Service","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Service (business); Sociology; Public relations; Business; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.07977746728504506,"score_gpt":0.32868903528524995,"score_spread":0.2489115680002049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521906274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9425144,0.00009823619,0.000020294376,0.046346966,0.000096783675,0.00007586507,9.057335e-7,0.000004460363,0.010842094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865353,0.00010555259,0.000025825022,0.010813639,0.0024923403,6.347143e-7,0.0000012892147,0.000008717036,0.000016714455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900836,0.00005684244,0.0003582583,0.00007998886,0.00032331535,0.00017322833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917424,0.00009801633,0.00037814112,0.000055444307,0.00028334206,0.0000108234735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015496652,0.00010425836,0.00022916698,0.0001098576,0.00034027352,0.0003133095,0.00014592243,0.00014840969,0.0000035342973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076734934,0.00007174744,0.00004832412,0.0003103418,0.00014683283,0.0010070133,0.00006853461,0.00068050704,7.899682e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009858545,0.0000820394,0.0024540618,0.0003001098,0.000014011559,0.000025483783,0.0043781395,0.000027444188,0.0001448765,0.99115175,0.00009554991,0.0012279579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0068299794,0.00021716961,0.14429581,0.0009114838,0.00037894785,0.00033486815,0.044623643,0.0018854383,0.000041145497,0.35339114,0.4461521,0.00093826815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012169916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023028827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6377606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015889724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010713082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99440813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524527383","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1055","title":"Tax Equity and Homelessness: A Tax Policy Analysis of the Golden Report","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Tax reform; Public economics; Economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.056525503471237325,"score_gpt":0.3195842347256473,"score_spread":0.26305873125441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524527383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9235914,0.00085794623,0.00012867799,0.018336516,0.00010422647,0.000052867363,0.00008310327,0.0000035821668,0.056841675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996923,0.0006527385,0.000022748898,0.0009315236,0.00057683553,0.0000010196712,5.4308003e-7,0.0000047060803,0.0008868721],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991265,0.000017232856,0.00056231115,0.00009411477,0.00006312818,0.0001367322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998593,0.000018906883,0.0011720796,0.00009416887,0.000077626886,0.000044234115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003822215,0.00007579108,0.0004995976,0.00025960035,0.0002088213,0.000050119517,0.00013202458,0.000051511488,0.000017602842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000114608214,0.00006120657,0.00020616983,0.00056388025,0.00018393096,0.00011884007,0.00013797304,0.00009761684,0.0000010548622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019133255,0.00005037169,0.11668965,0.000018572584,0.00063417805,0.0000075997177,0.004024374,0.000007019186,0.000013727423,0.8760692,0.00045679067,0.0020094195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043412638,0.000034777804,0.8535662,0.000008849489,0.00010301349,0.000038265065,0.000647634,0.000020729058,0.000006508302,0.08532236,0.059710663,0.00010682978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005809615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010789062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7907468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000586522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055267552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87824386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525209634","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1049","title":"Book Review: Worker's Compensation in Ontario, by D. G. Gilbert and L. A. Liverside","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.020239699012251394,"score_gpt":0.289481850230657,"score_spread":0.26924215121840556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525209634","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2432662,0.15378107,0.000006818068,0.26447856,0.00040685482,0.00049911934,0.000016969188,0.000017173857,0.33752725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6444188,0.12956746,0.000058572543,0.18559666,0.0014138544,0.0000018479842,0.0000025298805,0.000012811409,0.038927473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993787,0.00009094918,0.0001845228,0.000048785638,0.000167954,0.00012910973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996988,0.000028680282,0.00013182806,0.000021029657,0.000048047128,0.00007161464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027148006,0.000048237103,0.00015223122,0.000038539052,0.00031124856,0.000042618933,0.000054874894,0.00004861177,0.0003982765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023127217,0.000042458778,0.000034422155,0.00007303012,0.00013776646,0.00025246508,0.000014074566,0.00013800278,6.318409e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009200711,0.00010588375,0.0017279187,0.000015629797,0.00003438176,0.000011057348,0.040613927,1.5191009e-7,0.00002052069,0.2830026,0.6684683,0.005990426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028693734,0.000024672729,0.008777277,0.00008081551,0.000013454168,0.0000014719286,0.00029294187,5.028504e-7,9.4375133e-7,0.0006054163,0.98986787,0.00004770728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20960554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17677036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4011526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014300924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007047419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8382514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528060689","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1037","title":"Diminishing Returns: Age-Discriminatory Elements in the Employment Insurance Act","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.192393658484688,"score_gpt":0.4434325464171506,"score_spread":0.25103888793246254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528060689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91549844,0.00014579495,0.0000015534259,0.007108297,0.00022977013,0.00016961577,0.0000027270676,0.000005186847,0.07683859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99596554,0.0003043509,0.000033096097,0.0027945146,0.00076548546,0.0000048594893,3.8230314e-7,0.000007129231,0.00012465913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977144,0.0007533045,0.00046359142,0.000106914114,0.0006235245,0.000338271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994186,0.00009104432,0.00026088484,0.00008163752,0.000061600054,0.000086237706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00281989,0.00010570735,0.00021812001,0.000059735004,0.0006651219,0.00017387302,0.0002645853,0.00007923897,0.000020034799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023967771,0.00007658466,0.00011724183,0.00015252222,0.00040871452,0.00030438555,0.000021029029,0.00024630246,0.0000013288593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028284085,0.00031269927,0.056268044,0.000032432425,0.000036796813,0.000025408446,0.26322123,5.354134e-7,0.000053560678,0.675692,0.0010873334,0.0032416547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022872295,0.0004034228,0.32615617,0.00013320062,0.0000718638,0.00001219156,0.12348209,4.6418592e-7,0.00010908702,0.15357274,0.39331973,0.00045181412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004228153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046608686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5221193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024503365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023830844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63917303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528596893","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1012","title":"Civil Justice Problems and the Disability and Health Status of Canadians","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07411402938534853,"score_gpt":0.43890315179963635,"score_spread":0.36478912241428785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528596893","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31391183,0.00058474357,0.000041122974,0.6039477,0.00022976633,0.00018172932,0.000015145841,0.0000038306243,0.08108414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931608,0.00055955444,0.000051127303,0.0053124684,0.00079535483,3.7222452e-7,2.704405e-7,0.0000021267688,0.0001179159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920267,0.00016013977,0.00026361697,0.0000399715,0.00015123362,0.00018238256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908566,0.000285902,0.00029975333,0.000027344951,0.00014671838,0.00015458876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027219097,0.00003611587,0.0001266166,0.000031431584,0.0007657946,0.0000711125,0.000042271255,0.00003715978,0.00000922446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039351947,0.000025785,0.000020314345,0.0001612901,0.0011499574,0.00023288712,0.00000870413,0.00018580107,8.085296e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016789598,0.00002480951,0.0017945684,0.000026783284,0.000010819626,1.1930813e-7,0.15110718,1.15740775e-7,0.0000019088,0.8415293,0.00063790096,0.0048497263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011300276,0.00008873436,0.12341929,0.000019688547,0.00006347262,0.000009007732,0.084959485,0.0000017464674,0.0000015324536,0.042011913,0.74820864,0.000086439955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55948377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40288028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7995174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010958866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012144734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6080156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528824097","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1001","title":"A Closer Look at Seemingly Pro-Tenant Provisions in the Residential Tenancies Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Landlord; Notice; Renting; Legislature; Leasehold estate; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.030168176311533252,"score_gpt":0.35825166795438385,"score_spread":0.3280834916428506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528824097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7220536,0.00009170063,0.00000695677,0.21014445,0.000059373593,0.00027790858,0.0000069889256,0.00001019353,0.06734883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936886,0.00010708709,0.00004397776,0.0029933476,0.001989856,0.0000027917526,4.3449592e-7,0.000003465312,0.0011704612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989407,0.00013420163,0.00026741275,0.00007396082,0.00033953358,0.0002441782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995402,0.000059527443,0.00019039267,0.00006004465,0.00008257591,0.00006727901],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082958874,0.000066624765,0.00014456871,0.00005482974,0.0010701898,0.00014304392,0.00023745926,0.00007613242,0.000007634643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000882412,0.000035953646,0.00009690209,0.00018426773,0.00023945278,0.00022466063,0.000029974914,0.00020466482,0.0000033326664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000331815,0.00010061898,0.00024225881,0.000003921288,0.000007796284,0.000011771004,0.07049804,6.7678445e-7,0.00053798157,0.9218361,0.0034317684,0.003295892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006480062,0.00018762203,0.04844547,0.000034825687,0.000032645254,0.000025488473,0.0084648505,0.0000024393992,0.00008462139,0.062172793,0.8797493,0.00015192329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00471237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058869277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87631756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011213982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003946447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8231143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W253311260","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1207","title":"Fighting for the Right to Housing in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wellesley Institute; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Legislation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Economic Justice; Common law; Fair Housing Act; Public administration","score_opus":0.04495896988797166,"score_gpt":0.35400155828177166,"score_spread":0.3090425883938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W253311260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5753164,0.0010327998,0.00023358427,0.20841344,0.0019203584,0.00052896066,0.000026688982,0.000013875244,0.21251385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99321896,0.0000043772793,0.000195038,0.0030635535,0.0033484933,0.0000011705288,5.5476217e-8,0.000004534101,0.00016384647],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921167,0.0000785457,0.00018349833,0.000041258627,0.00027529275,0.00020975266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994267,0.00017604991,0.00011144832,0.000027717151,0.00013114179,0.00012693391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008116024,0.00004263794,0.00012722354,0.00003269503,0.00043371593,0.00006907509,0.00016157962,0.000033069577,0.0000036078354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038427504,0.000029313633,0.000032566335,0.00014089023,0.000085155996,0.000108316526,0.000023164206,0.000107145934,4.7125573e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048377857,0.000013640739,0.00096438144,0.000006887321,0.000022933424,0.000018056617,0.5535956,0.00004015018,0.000010165207,0.42757523,0.013036927,0.004667612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002768576,0.000021717477,0.00025896105,0.000009964306,0.00000882237,8.7875026e-7,0.01538604,0.000007725616,0.000013802266,0.0070494106,0.9769089,0.000056871148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9473584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9601667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.963872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059638335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023200691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4115703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548941087","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1057","title":"Women's Voices Being Heard: Responsive Lawyering","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04631599057308432,"score_gpt":0.4110980670236919,"score_spread":0.36478207645060756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548941087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.623993,0.0000277944,0.000009292139,0.16065036,0.00026076,0.00003237243,9.318603e-7,0.000009519238,0.215016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860626,0.00015555887,0.00009989094,0.0073161125,0.0038313505,0.0000012022472,1.902868e-7,0.0000048206566,0.0025283122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991217,0.00018501133,0.00021540599,0.00004838326,0.0002317479,0.00019770635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992146,0.00016765007,0.00022597621,0.00002955789,0.00026206585,0.00010013479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010145807,0.000048463113,0.00011860662,0.00011838035,0.0010047466,0.00023026485,0.00008881383,0.00006198806,0.000097931596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050017,0.000046145004,0.000041399355,0.000296425,0.00018869732,0.000807958,0.000013581533,0.00025867403,0.0000063884136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003368545,0.000026866614,0.00016436163,0.0000028085426,0.000018770972,0.0000057873617,0.15632495,3.3313242e-7,0.00011556817,0.83906466,0.00091805676,0.0033241825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013640837,0.00003224304,0.0013078155,0.0000068297873,0.0000066972366,0.0000134587435,0.02861224,3.0306973e-7,0.000010029805,0.02347734,0.94634145,0.000055154043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066804676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067517196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015814893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007920964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620610655","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1254","title":"Reconciling Reconciliation: Differing Conceptions of the Supreme Court of Canada and the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Healing Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous; Political science; Sovereignty; Commission; Transitional justice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Colonialism; Sociology; Indigenous rights; Human rights; History; Politics","score_opus":0.03263058099359439,"score_gpt":0.3134063653689297,"score_spread":0.2807757843753353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620610655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9505024,0.00012268225,0.0000011065296,0.0142119415,0.00046251557,0.00014276734,0.00001752799,0.0000010317452,0.03453805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99745446,0.000944558,0.000014866412,0.00014351499,0.00081875717,3.0922666e-7,3.7802386e-7,0.0000031759757,0.0006199815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899507,0.00023445101,0.00032302004,0.00005613909,0.00022862882,0.00016272362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986361,0.0001732523,0.0006497712,0.000084074025,0.00032751306,0.00012928789],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013605603,0.000056964967,0.00019989302,0.0000323117,0.009572786,0.000070881724,0.00015275876,0.000084087435,0.000007823574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011466571,0.000034704994,0.00003973411,0.00003796477,0.0008801389,0.00016658235,0.0000033401166,0.0001436191,2.5949001e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002726327,0.000008528829,0.0059366073,0.000039328144,0.000029344763,2.953594e-7,0.34993073,0.0000010126107,0.000008141491,0.6429072,0.0001143439,0.0009972227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037341109,0.00013493719,0.52116674,0.00034859663,0.00017652765,0.00003028276,0.04515948,0.000074078205,0.00029132052,0.049686722,0.3788368,0.00036039704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99680173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5932205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032847223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017227119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9917166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620765319","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1257","title":"Small Claims Court: A Vehicle for Social Change and the Case for Equitable Relief","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Appeal; Grassroots; Legislature; Political science; Law; Scope (computer science); Debt; Public administration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.1706944303902091,"score_gpt":0.40060602750015883,"score_spread":0.22991159710994974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620765319","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6458845,0.0008608614,0.000043704225,0.34285304,0.00048318223,0.0012070879,0.00009645356,0.000017061026,0.0085540805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98707104,0.0002825092,0.00015148257,0.001841356,0.010012398,0.000043020555,4.45742e-7,0.000010125846,0.00058762374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990016,0.00010957346,0.00023975622,0.00009583152,0.00015966452,0.0003935298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987923,0.00029440998,0.0004672687,0.000048818063,0.00030833413,0.000088879555],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015302409,0.000105823456,0.00034072323,0.000018822784,0.011503498,0.000430159,0.00020952772,0.00013678675,0.0000025034092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042156858,0.00006821882,0.00019829976,0.000026917556,0.0014721925,0.00033832484,0.00009907622,0.00014541527,3.655955e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024124223,0.000030440868,0.000060154354,0.00004438671,0.00009945717,0.000012581901,0.18792011,2.926744e-8,0.000020843725,0.7975921,0.0033063206,0.010672337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013158874,0.0004064678,0.005415947,0.00005075289,0.00046202418,0.000075258,0.06702291,0.000053665066,0.000024561457,0.15645322,0.75640494,0.00047135542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03691967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015207053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7530986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000104099934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000089520814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9897834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620782846","doi":"","title":"Charter Litigation, Social and Economic Rights & Civil Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Civil rights; Political science; Social rights; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.02745461013366895,"score_gpt":0.3526265116974939,"score_spread":0.32517190156382497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620782846","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69993865,0.00014035912,0.0000022333872,0.043738585,0.00038473617,0.000101244164,0.00001666442,0.000013489924,0.25566402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871752,0.00003149898,0.000027977434,0.0006695702,0.011076847,0.0000011353626,3.0879642e-7,0.000006944156,0.0010104652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991697,0.00007979022,0.00023413313,0.00009474321,0.0001950455,0.00022655503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925387,0.000025646043,0.0004323836,0.00005655405,0.00010382116,0.00012770754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044703885,0.00008564243,0.00022383023,0.000044722474,0.0035201937,0.00048983254,0.0002295653,0.0001455764,0.000038230286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006956514,0.00007545129,0.000076632205,0.000019149584,0.001068257,0.0006537209,0.00004779504,0.0001742566,0.000007827168],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130310345,0.000012742354,0.0007625665,0.000010084347,0.000028284747,0.0000040066416,0.23328708,2.0785187e-8,0.000012676197,0.76274246,0.002593997,0.00053302577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000796747,0.000057995705,0.017489193,0.00001979394,0.000044892473,0.000007431626,0.0025704927,0.0000018731581,0.000028070825,0.17534706,0.8034423,0.00019412873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0070223203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051542167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8008483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010498672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029926878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620857392","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1260","title":"Networking the Rule of Law: The Canadian Bar Association’s Abandoned Intervention in Chevron v Yaiguaje","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Intervention (counseling); Legislature; Corporate governance; Corporation; Politics; Supreme court; Sociology; Multinational corporation; Legal profession; Public administration; Management","score_opus":0.05769061674622808,"score_gpt":0.40998201729470296,"score_spread":0.35229140054847485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620857392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16415201,0.00010666958,0.000002545739,0.543911,0.0010617888,0.000119931785,0.000005412535,0.0000026806074,0.29063797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99304104,0.000054099448,0.000008225102,0.002991066,0.0031138037,0.0000016199236,5.632075e-7,0.000003177865,0.00078641647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990314,0.0002635697,0.00027536237,0.000037311653,0.00023472265,0.00015758765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869174,0.00016524584,0.00078606483,0.00006780422,0.00024197831,0.000047191446],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027875793,0.000041496696,0.000107588174,0.0000496162,0.002722797,0.00044513904,0.00025064038,0.00008406783,0.000029006966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006092074,0.000028354621,0.00007379167,0.000085698375,0.0002504062,0.0005249397,0.00001638704,0.00034393772,0.0000016081714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076108367,0.00002407741,0.003281122,0.0000026867422,0.00002838362,4.783367e-7,0.06795409,6.884831e-7,0.000005412053,0.92442745,0.0016546209,0.0026134013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038628644,0.000014886553,0.09713208,0.000023754621,0.000024903547,0.0000011812242,0.0050435923,0.000002997897,0.00000763729,0.023796229,0.87351525,0.00005117713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8684808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87493455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037573016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009172494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620997730","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1256","title":"“Don’t Want to Get Exposed”: Law’s Violence and Access to Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05194663206499233,"score_gpt":0.39562403984215405,"score_spread":0.3436774077771617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620997730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76081616,0.00029694452,0.000036931822,0.13580753,0.00070337293,0.00022630999,0.000025346437,0.0000177133,0.10206966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750396,0.0009896581,0.00019174034,0.018317826,0.005005155,0.0000020954412,1.7169619e-7,0.0000071791846,0.0004465754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989325,0.00008615217,0.00020888756,0.0001216285,0.0003544013,0.00029643715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910897,0.000040534724,0.00022383394,0.00009616098,0.00019198362,0.00033852085],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059550774,0.00009966939,0.00023190731,0.000011456995,0.005108849,0.0006967778,0.00053146627,0.00014432133,0.000017523891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018024987,0.00008143614,0.00008492458,0.000060069513,0.0005489572,0.000683554,0.00023988677,0.00019905591,0.0000034973464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037794143,0.000032265,0.00019011776,0.000026259593,0.00002836376,0.000011444309,0.13836539,8.924896e-7,0.00023768762,0.84884256,0.006093667,0.0061335624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007299292,0.0002008995,0.0065850276,0.00023666798,0.00012831866,0.000014887051,0.024624396,7.7489574e-7,0.00024122807,0.07643826,0.89044976,0.0003498172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008849977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047990703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88435614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007274497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017063494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99775016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621078189","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1259","title":"The Intersection of Exploitation and Coercion in Cases of Canadian Labour Trafficking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Human trafficking; Criminology; Political science; Sex trafficking; Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.04175863244943335,"score_gpt":0.3547033492986688,"score_spread":0.31294471684923547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621078189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98838615,0.00020488324,4.9277e-7,0.0052263145,0.00014476516,0.000027460224,6.7301596e-7,7.8337644e-7,0.006008484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986987,0.00084477017,0.000007785111,0.000041646505,0.00034612056,1.568449e-7,6.9176934e-8,0.0000018591332,0.00005885747],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957454,0.000074224896,0.0001543257,0.000025206045,0.000089568355,0.000082148676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953914,0.000062565254,0.00025030502,0.000022437156,0.00008554339,0.00003999576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048011905,0.000026758793,0.00009335995,0.00010047986,0.0007424853,0.000053509903,0.000063285355,0.000060763625,0.0000015774817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018166914,0.000019619276,0.000024877909,0.00006405237,0.0003362286,0.00014911963,0.000006036719,0.00008004935,4.8568943e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054627366,0.000020128788,0.0038339878,0.000016189471,0.00003411921,0.0000093184,0.48647153,0.0000041550866,0.00021096869,0.4780813,0.00012631055,0.031137398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018092908,0.0004356944,0.2559877,0.00044532414,0.00007421442,0.000033656925,0.6194767,0.000028626806,0.0006782164,0.05330162,0.06750417,0.00022478821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6031434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5411911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42477965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047143396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016776146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57106715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264322951","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1210","title":"The Right to Housing in France: Still a Long Way to Go from Intention to Implementation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Residence; Right to the city; State (computer science); Public housing; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03707366967106825,"score_gpt":0.304258972785062,"score_spread":0.26718530311399374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W264322951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98501295,0.0001831477,0.0014135613,0.00875786,0.00040123504,0.00012358848,0.00003843093,0.000003901765,0.0040653204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941831,0.000048841976,0.00033188902,0.004241992,0.00095813844,0.0000033262158,0.0000014352394,0.000011375483,0.000219905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990966,0.000021470996,0.00050248415,0.00011284178,0.00005771231,0.00020889244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994775,0.000018928988,0.00024246825,0.000060772152,0.000068214846,0.00013208648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052000175,0.000079876496,0.00024684868,0.00018165179,0.0001406943,0.00012849965,0.000112837515,0.00005014126,0.000009462625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023199193,0.00007121409,0.00005939046,0.0002111704,0.00002367866,0.00019199643,0.00003821782,0.00010663738,0.00003956443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027822223,0.0001383235,0.0351844,0.0000178227,0.00010156928,0.00003602982,0.14556226,0.00011520243,0.0003119388,0.73946965,0.01295364,0.06583097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013567613,0.0002330408,0.19498433,0.00004269037,0.0000073449605,0.0000043302516,0.00077164994,0.000020005935,0.00017472623,0.026928628,0.7752543,0.00022219079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013683181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007243459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76230067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018708357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035833495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9928848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750962442","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1266","title":"The Complications of Colonialism for Gentrification Theory and Marxist Geography","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gentrification; Indigenous; Marxist philosophy; Colonialism; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Ideology; Political economy; Political science; History; Law; Economics; Economic growth; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.023265978349130353,"score_gpt":0.33979044158722677,"score_spread":0.3165244632380964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750962442","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7532316,0.0045431354,0.0009918115,0.19972438,0.0002735433,0.0004705013,0.00013138638,0.000018373848,0.040615316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99797815,0.000312522,0.00007935223,0.0008667491,0.00057125953,9.781036e-7,4.9027403e-7,0.0000015454551,0.00018892383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999531,0.000092836344,0.00014867005,0.0000342428,0.00010450549,0.00008878731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993277,0.00022412672,0.0002649937,0.000028553291,0.000120980774,0.000033635788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007799939,0.000030500154,0.00008203953,0.000022265504,0.00087631814,0.000044928933,0.000082590566,0.000038041228,4.2141724e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112358684,0.000022618184,0.00004923108,0.00005896986,0.00037285197,0.00005892294,0.000003356097,0.000049340815,6.960507e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003752479,0.000014979423,0.0002461403,0.0000021978942,0.000010797678,7.126495e-8,0.007165298,8.73448e-8,0.00007558444,0.98650485,0.0017193443,0.004223148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003509073,0.00010372258,0.130131,0.000008890192,0.000035144043,0.0000023449215,0.0013396358,0.0000017191994,0.000024344574,0.29526132,0.57268906,0.000051896666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007442906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009903383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6912435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013112646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007536844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67400193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751532069","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1270","title":"Developers, the State, and the Politics of Private Property Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Statute; Negotiation; Nonpossessory interest in land; Land law; Property rights; Political science; Private property; Land tenure; Land use; State (computer science); New institutionalism; Public administration; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Geography; Civil engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.010960572863882972,"score_gpt":0.23171164693312088,"score_spread":0.2207510740692379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751532069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93286073,0.00043372868,0.000068334666,0.007954276,0.000053778702,0.00008785153,0.0000024724588,0.000008195808,0.058530644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803567,0.00012806647,0.00006552436,0.0006232874,0.00035874994,2.4587936e-7,7.8750624e-8,0.000003918585,0.0007844407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995571,0.00003445634,0.00017697908,0.000024805002,0.000099940014,0.00010676547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982643,0.000021282658,0.00006000172,0.000037396352,0.00002754745,0.00002735717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022947851,0.000056647874,0.00013292245,0.0000272708,0.0001824534,0.00003031575,0.00007956647,0.000023394792,0.0000014272574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000772804,0.00002150459,0.000034375164,0.000037335743,0.00015838833,0.000027124535,0.000015535554,0.000111285575,2.8454738e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045992318,0.000025050798,0.000023240866,0.0000680358,0.00021089427,0.0000074588907,0.062789835,0.00026316277,0.00014534862,0.92291737,0.003326838,0.010176794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036383693,0.00024863883,0.010179769,0.00012457358,0.00015362557,0.00009190217,0.0016732974,0.0009133863,0.0006588277,0.08128303,0.90072984,0.00030474138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019097992,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000057842153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.897403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000144314245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001440205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14033024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751540023","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1263","title":"The Properties of Planning: An Evolving Landscape","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Scholarship; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Property rights; Law; Political science; Function (biology); Object (grammar); Property law; Sociology; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Business; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.053760351179483606,"score_gpt":0.36115950563449417,"score_spread":0.30739915445501054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751540023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87444633,0.00068854715,0.000011310754,0.03404954,0.000046338,0.000063711086,0.0000016808709,0.000007889893,0.09068464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99781847,0.00007715839,0.000026991676,0.00048166516,0.001416924,3.1291955e-7,7.622822e-8,0.0000018878217,0.00017651504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999462,0.000061093844,0.00016962472,0.000030509353,0.00016460528,0.000112151625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996072,0.000021879034,0.00016303838,0.000033191915,0.00012305769,0.000051656934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045209852,0.00003325661,0.00008914362,0.00001977356,0.0009132994,0.00009885151,0.00013776465,0.00003629022,0.0000022391514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005375245,0.000020377844,0.0000435091,0.00006457485,0.00019273511,0.00019708367,0.000009044204,0.000086974476,2.698594e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127102485,0.000026818883,0.00014672895,0.0000022057577,0.000007699222,4.300133e-7,0.04140591,0.0000016758611,0.00069618295,0.95435363,0.00039126535,0.0029547631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008152507,0.00045831388,0.035644826,0.00008004389,0.000058102334,0.000011969374,0.049931157,0.0000622974,0.0006337357,0.10882275,0.8032284,0.00025318802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001203292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001895832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84553087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001651546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001660697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70244527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752532644","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1264","title":"Community, Property, and Human Rights: The Failure of Property-as-Respect","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Private property; Law and economics; Property law; Numerus clausus; Human rights; Political science; Law; Land law; Sociology; Business; Land tenure; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.043043714012098916,"score_gpt":0.3476722668467948,"score_spread":0.3046285528346959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752532644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5097533,0.00026519582,0.0000017638448,0.17833309,0.00006353084,0.00028626408,0.000004919846,0.00001811439,0.3112738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916766,0.00005310759,0.000020423178,0.0019229415,0.0013919394,6.1168885e-7,3.193042e-7,0.000004959477,0.0049290955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849147,0.0005404315,0.00032705523,0.00006409928,0.000356348,0.00022057931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99931484,0.000041787112,0.00024394046,0.00008984676,0.00020405518,0.00010552685],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010828436,0.00010715774,0.0002918119,0.00006669418,0.0029081379,0.0001682506,0.0003492304,0.000099608784,0.000028637667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004593442,0.000039305774,0.00009457536,0.00014002903,0.0010071404,0.00030972413,0.000053665575,0.0004938925,0.0000012299795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043045595,0.00012233488,0.00003089082,0.000011858198,0.000034805515,0.000006151257,0.04516815,7.177308e-8,0.000825037,0.9471607,0.0032857554,0.0033111647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005769996,0.00062173716,0.0012169933,0.000045928227,0.00003657414,0.000026890053,0.0017334907,5.09087e-7,0.00021949697,0.10260028,0.8928094,0.00011173078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.110955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015047492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8895236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044876837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017936103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752717888","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1265","title":"Revitalizing Land Use Law: Introductory Notes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.052099636497167146,"score_gpt":0.3443510968078286,"score_spread":0.29225146031066146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752717888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6124123,0.001410394,0.000023986267,0.18407384,0.0005539791,0.00017858646,0.000010303633,0.000046637324,0.20129001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98439014,0.0003117206,0.00008506589,0.006564237,0.00801784,1.1951327e-7,3.629777e-7,0.000004114195,0.0006264019],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991316,0.0001243782,0.00022440824,0.000070042464,0.00024073971,0.00020878538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995241,0.000050386192,0.00014799461,0.000041783587,0.00012551872,0.00011019995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004971102,0.00007150892,0.00020825278,0.000050320534,0.00069997204,0.00022013648,0.000113270515,0.00007335788,0.000018064293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013703933,0.00004838172,0.00008778928,0.000085346845,0.0002789399,0.00062463345,0.000012329223,0.00017317267,0.0000023942098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021209296,0.000029819656,0.00011125621,0.0000038132628,0.000013255795,0.000010436153,0.008555374,1.9465026e-7,0.00026137382,0.985342,0.0009890584,0.004662192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032230892,0.00010811366,0.0023916205,0.000021321874,0.000020879104,0.000010251997,0.00018072751,4.6029842e-7,0.00006535591,0.031722505,0.9650531,0.00010336171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018829355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017958176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96406406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060135284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013856431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98770434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753386623","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1271","title":"Shared Path: Bridging Indigenous and Settler Notions of Urban Planning: An Annotated Interview with Carolyn King","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Negotiation; Human settlement; Settlement (finance); Power (physics); Transformative learning; Geography; Sociology; History; Political science; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.03376680703605232,"score_gpt":0.3428979553269156,"score_spread":0.30913114829086324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753386623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98943585,0.0003986184,0.000036743262,0.0020250806,0.000087974535,0.00013381669,0.00001412701,0.000010934631,0.00785685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99723655,0.00040631127,0.00010765013,0.000488911,0.0016190892,1.874827e-7,0.000004385239,0.000007125689,0.00012981416],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988736,0.00021409009,0.00031824864,0.00008960984,0.00023153386,0.00027292524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991508,0.000028093356,0.0003701784,0.000046499084,0.0002430204,0.00016142087],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064205163,0.00009090974,0.00025682128,0.00013607567,0.0028617051,0.00008518945,0.00010648933,0.00009543256,0.000004614019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000043721498,0.00006951175,0.0000442118,0.00017460623,0.00023029273,0.0003631183,0.000001260798,0.00017820328,2.1955961e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022764705,0.00009871721,0.0011448339,0.000029644772,0.000025573689,0.000007658215,0.9272474,0.0000017721788,0.000017965313,0.07030291,0.000037468653,0.0010633136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004262848,0.0047377734,0.40655896,0.0015738043,0.00045153647,0.0003500044,0.11673339,0.000031712425,0.00021660376,0.023922302,0.43980208,0.0013590063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038055725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028230827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.810514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000091426744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029341483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753914497","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1267","title":"Planning as Property: Uncovering the Hidden Racial Logic of a Municipal Nuisance By-law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Statutory law; Law; Indigenous; Property (philosophy); State (computer science); Identity (music); Political science; Property law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Property rights; Politics","score_opus":0.03689614601650031,"score_gpt":0.35326902880745514,"score_spread":0.3163728827909548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753914497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49356076,0.0020242883,0.0000074695276,0.048866518,0.0002799402,0.00019099943,0.000011962639,0.000022052038,0.45503598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98839545,0.00026018175,0.000045348985,0.007595968,0.0028089155,6.8448253e-7,4.2884818e-7,0.0000046890386,0.0008883488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988138,0.00017251754,0.00027726247,0.000074058065,0.00041121253,0.0002511213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940073,0.00005002168,0.00031538436,0.000051650906,0.000106519365,0.000075717435],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006250292,0.00009293812,0.00024278714,0.0000064512396,0.0013829706,0.000097422475,0.0002916179,0.00016010234,0.000017235163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007700731,0.00005247282,0.00016161897,0.00013804868,0.00070097524,0.0002682468,0.000027228127,0.00031046555,0.0000011274182],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004692436,0.00004382476,0.000024954245,0.0000065417867,0.00003293587,0.0000052291193,0.21573041,0.000003921042,0.00046474065,0.7792255,0.0026668326,0.0017481337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007126407,0.0002861807,0.00026399482,0.00007596174,0.000057202065,0.000016423712,0.036513075,0.0000022404417,0.00021676974,0.14683683,0.8148319,0.00018677094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00592025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043925917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8121651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007225246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014976472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796608016","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1303","title":"Issue 1: Feathers of Hope: Child Welfare Youth Forum","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Youth work; Work (physics); Welfare; Feather; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Public relations; Criminology; Media studies; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.029315481355880947,"score_gpt":0.3760253103004451,"score_spread":0.34670982894456415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796608016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048730534,0.00014228236,0.000011033501,0.34787747,0.0008670645,0.000080938116,0.000011270358,0.000010128945,0.6022693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98802453,0.00009481473,0.00006875025,0.0036627569,0.007009246,3.4103155e-7,5.4277496e-7,0.000007687999,0.0011313162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989979,0.00021673509,0.0002413014,0.00005878124,0.00028799026,0.00019725611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990882,0.00005333554,0.0004030903,0.00004372692,0.00029841936,0.000113184826],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064199144,0.00006551257,0.00018913618,0.00006862284,0.0018870072,0.00006403261,0.00015463089,0.00011344311,0.00039928046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024574183,0.000059922542,0.00010340803,0.00029431304,0.00064099336,0.0002684266,0.000018607525,0.00016319193,0.00001238023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040297444,0.000053316533,0.00023616925,0.0000047754856,0.000039576265,4.9003825e-7,0.21914297,2.1020902e-8,0.0000053066387,0.7663725,0.0056386925,0.0084658805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002537546,0.00007940274,0.0013198808,0.000008149347,0.00003373625,0.0000020993357,0.14768746,6.091654e-8,0.000026168318,0.003538543,0.84698814,0.000062618186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072679752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012913997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93929404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000060165723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023090868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796638899","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1301","title":"Issue 1: Caring Society v Canada: Neoliberalism, Social Reproduction, and Indigenous Child Welfare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Neoliberalism (international relations); Reproduction; Welfare; Social reproduction; Politics; Political science; Tribunal; Social Welfare; Social work; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Child care; Political economy; Economic growth; Social science; Law; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.019510292626329025,"score_gpt":0.30204294208430077,"score_spread":0.28253264945797174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796638899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76601297,0.0006666216,0.0000012917754,0.21275938,0.0007064466,0.00015710387,0.00001620506,0.00002442073,0.019655593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9730148,0.0002881921,0.000053548338,0.003334717,0.022688976,0.000001394412,8.581345e-7,0.000011593101,0.00060593634],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984844,0.00013463883,0.00032730636,0.00017490226,0.00047529084,0.0004034589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990319,0.00002193399,0.0003171008,0.00004566037,0.00044278745,0.0001406],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005064963,0.00014274001,0.00033500188,0.000025564827,0.0079044355,0.00013961761,0.00014150253,0.00015430611,0.000022948121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009605946,0.00012226758,0.00011994629,0.00016676931,0.0011268513,0.0002901841,0.00007870211,0.0002980934,8.2837175e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025528681,0.00003257714,0.0008043046,0.000035590525,0.00025471678,0.000006785098,0.8696224,3.0988957e-7,0.00002987569,0.106238514,0.017149676,0.0057997233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004467918,0.000057313217,0.035334714,0.000013948942,0.00006399754,0.000020522992,0.055204067,3.8614198e-7,0.000036537545,0.0009982688,0.9076062,0.00021725513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89362407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.65348357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8904565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051409414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003951307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99338716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796934453","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1294","title":"Issue 1: Reimagining Child Welfare Systems in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Research in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare system; Welfare; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.03273261564435942,"score_gpt":0.3809233973006133,"score_spread":0.3481907816562539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796934453","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109459125,0.00026441156,0.0000025310535,0.16847867,0.0015202377,0.00014492431,0.00000771114,0.000008442854,0.72011393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98949116,0.0001066229,0.000017146931,0.00084871094,0.009240379,9.526539e-7,1.0874183e-7,0.000004853755,0.00029005628],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800766,0.00034395835,0.00030650012,0.00009060103,0.00082289526,0.00042836735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925035,0.000060854047,0.00020916101,0.0000402715,0.000241038,0.00019829413],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015980264,0.00006785452,0.00022118943,0.000091504866,0.0016921855,0.00017941109,0.0003248751,0.00006295547,0.000069796835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027981485,0.000053013853,0.000039312763,0.0003906325,0.00090216263,0.0003671925,0.00004135582,0.00028583448,0.00000267585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000203516,0.000019829708,0.0047630267,0.000016617485,0.000021253845,0.00004075382,0.07605179,0.0000014217023,0.000010432869,0.89863676,0.008483437,0.011934313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020375798,0.000042641615,0.0072036376,0.000032042844,0.0000032646412,0.000005674734,0.04517715,0.000005886101,0.0000043697805,0.0015974507,0.94563824,0.00008587543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99550694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98292804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9371548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00078159926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027561814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797085390","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1299","title":"Issue 1: Giidosendiwag (We Walk Together): Creating Culturally Based Supports for Urban Indigenous Youth in Care","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Situated; Commission; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.02087793396164473,"score_gpt":0.3428938418709772,"score_spread":0.3220159079093325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797085390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9195136,0.0002932168,0.0000119827355,0.0024980914,0.0006666816,0.00046791308,0.000036541194,0.000015020623,0.07649695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98390424,0.00036507176,0.00030016244,0.0006491734,0.013394897,0.0000012384164,0.0000088605075,0.000015024439,0.0013613008],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984432,0.00021158175,0.00042775305,0.00012209309,0.00028815263,0.000507222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988418,0.00007366537,0.00037028,0.000055560657,0.00048659346,0.00017209907],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078235514,0.00011999483,0.00027909476,0.00014622853,0.0053500626,0.00010496688,0.00016469473,0.00020146451,0.00003171279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001646138,0.00009311746,0.00011314955,0.00017037151,0.00035465226,0.00022552795,0.0000015665057,0.00016786545,0.000002805764],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037674923,0.000056849578,0.0006242794,0.000055596047,0.000011747786,0.0000026953157,0.9446378,2.2189138e-7,0.000004039413,0.05366519,0.00010465258,0.00079929014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009870158,0.0004986306,0.0012002559,0.00008976187,0.000053550895,0.00000394948,0.31595448,9.459703e-7,0.00016873446,0.0032840103,0.67751795,0.00024071315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20204888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54646194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6774133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038931466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009176946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797101661","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1302","title":"Issue 1: “Reimagining” the Child Welfare System","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Economic Justice; Welfare; Treaty; Dream; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.024902341586446414,"score_gpt":0.3443306166717743,"score_spread":0.3194282750853279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797101661","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.123102404,0.00010703835,0.000028128654,0.28048635,0.001090579,0.00013402953,0.000008521955,0.000027029837,0.59501594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9797335,0.000018399036,0.000012393947,0.0012798265,0.01859926,5.520425e-7,3.0424494e-7,0.000004929368,0.00035079505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914616,0.00016723298,0.0002024139,0.000052536583,0.00025596414,0.00017570502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994909,0.000025890005,0.00020127627,0.00004441371,0.00016394295,0.00007353316],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005922756,0.00005716283,0.00013062816,0.00003684199,0.0027694155,0.00013825389,0.00013752194,0.000058425387,0.000058559686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031818923,0.000030210003,0.00006919079,0.00010766412,0.0005737531,0.00016860559,0.000016569178,0.00014790751,0.000013349873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010359341,0.000010186457,0.00009864763,0.0000044178814,0.000019363306,0.0000012803625,0.056520075,1.0173784e-7,0.0000017679505,0.93976337,0.001445808,0.0021246027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022292596,0.000059882914,0.0045450623,0.000021948461,0.000031156083,0.0000129741065,0.00670403,0.0000041617773,0.000017378055,0.0026194863,0.9857002,0.00006081214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010905801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002513936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98425436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055239136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009149892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99852884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797183728","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1304","title":"Issue 1: Kokum’s House","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Architectural engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.019163708856350967,"score_gpt":0.3304624308015361,"score_spread":0.3112987219451851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797183728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3257218,0.00030458614,0.00000903241,0.047154117,0.001426826,0.000078294834,0.0000060771,0.000046825815,0.6252524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9785279,0.00008721937,0.000053862772,0.0038132765,0.015225982,3.016284e-7,6.1895726e-8,0.0000062725703,0.0022851166],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929297,0.000066475106,0.00016195554,0.000049727085,0.00023557254,0.00019332748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999486,0.000022183016,0.0001264077,0.000030150326,0.00023118763,0.00010403454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003241162,0.00005380695,0.0001483542,0.000043964195,0.0009850811,0.00007038901,0.0001290011,0.00008999525,0.00007799669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007546247,0.00004965284,0.00006693377,0.00011686646,0.00088919787,0.00020624802,0.00002309606,0.00009231979,0.00003562914],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003700306,0.000028660987,0.000087261804,0.0000035828705,0.000017394828,0.0000069615676,0.06673259,1.0084501e-8,0.000049944,0.90182,0.026077239,0.0051393574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017209684,0.0001413761,0.0005281709,0.000004952129,0.000014244512,0.000004318035,0.0017402655,6.8971296e-8,0.000022878996,0.024638288,0.9726769,0.000056455083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020016484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044792327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94659966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103801955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030321794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9865093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797204018","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1295","title":"Issue 1: Reimagining Overrepresentation Research: Critical Reflections on Researching the Overrepresentation of First Nations Children in the Child Welfare System","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Ambiguity; Welfare; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12192092594690311,"score_gpt":0.49606971133219835,"score_spread":0.3741487853852952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797204018","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14203727,0.00006682109,0.000061376115,0.45859855,0.00034743838,0.00045874284,0.000019314317,0.000016214999,0.39839426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99391663,0.00008582182,0.000025570178,0.0003736228,0.0055416,0.000005059474,0.000002353037,0.000006795067,0.000042558542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970157,0.0013298502,0.00034655497,0.00011491157,0.0009441597,0.00024878353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831,0.00092739856,0.00016661745,0.00010899112,0.00043670827,0.000050233128],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034098153,0.00006563137,0.00013071636,0.00033846655,0.0059373914,0.0002050866,0.0002711988,0.000072762385,0.000015984091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00139357,0.000041114596,0.00008196036,0.0007869823,0.001019555,0.00038604854,0.000043253003,0.00060224347,0.0000029461828],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040694005,0.00006121189,0.0011775378,0.000014444608,0.000015561516,0.0000015784419,0.08049759,0.0000066980847,0.000010388537,0.91684926,0.0006919797,0.0006330629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001434942,0.00067099096,0.48716345,0.0006640846,0.00007674858,0.000094605464,0.32518214,0.00008314322,0.0001266423,0.033645544,0.15059738,0.00026032436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036012787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022508476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8832037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001631759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012022915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99535674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797477049","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1298","title":"Issue 1: Anti-Black Racism, Bio-Power, and Governmentality: Deconstructing the Suffering of Black Families Involved with Child Welfare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Racism; Sociology; Gender studies; Welfare; Colonialism; Narrative; Power (physics); White (mutation); White supremacy; Political science; Politics; Law; Art","score_opus":0.020512505493736607,"score_gpt":0.33453003662727776,"score_spread":0.31401753113354114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797477049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8629084,0.00008065296,0.00000493582,0.060001906,0.00023358189,0.00008396238,0.0000060890106,0.0000062289582,0.07667419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960062,0.0002742209,0.00007876392,0.0013532871,0.0021490362,4.085256e-7,2.967296e-7,0.00000829705,0.00012952529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888587,0.00024737825,0.00025105476,0.000086487715,0.00034016414,0.00018904447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900883,0.00016378,0.0005058655,0.000056065815,0.00017715635,0.00008830197],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081284996,0.00009328833,0.00023456509,0.000042312462,0.0020782535,0.00013689508,0.0001360351,0.00008652232,0.00009653497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019794497,0.000067798865,0.000057493475,0.00026890304,0.0024454102,0.00034139166,0.000038347564,0.0002013587,0.0000021905653],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010568963,0.000069159934,0.019937998,0.00003597951,0.00017991758,0.0000019321676,0.31124297,2.2624117e-7,0.00007003519,0.6615388,0.0009099039,0.005907403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006330726,0.00014371172,0.041371047,0.000042791464,0.00008049994,0.000012731779,0.57647526,0.0000011394228,0.00020388837,0.0018478371,0.37903517,0.00015283671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034223397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022547937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.659691,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007050567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015238347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798070126","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1297","title":"Issue 1: “It’s Better Late Than Never”: A Community-Based HIV Research and Training Response to Supporting Mothers Living with HIV Who Have Child Welfare Involvement (Part I)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Poverty; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Focus group; Welfare; Qualitative research; Domestic violence; Stigma (botany); Social work; Social Welfare; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Medicine; Political science; Poison control; Environmental health; Family medicine; Suicide prevention; Psychiatry; Social science","score_opus":0.13137473829170876,"score_gpt":0.4541492256989205,"score_spread":0.32277448740721176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798070126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843989,0.000014826619,0.000026353855,0.1078044,0.00006652815,0.00026100277,0.000026114623,0.0000140835655,0.007387807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856341,0.000012198627,0.00016178649,0.010155444,0.0031005647,0.000013656272,0.0000027727367,0.000042698433,0.0008768166],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953516,0.0026716327,0.0006213894,0.00014677747,0.00048486778,0.0007237276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99797004,0.000648304,0.0003912957,0.00014649701,0.0005277703,0.00031611684],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006255885,0.00017794779,0.00058995286,0.00028283047,0.006379956,0.0001010411,0.00021219603,0.00020264405,0.00009535278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023711841,0.00014352582,0.000061969855,0.00021471073,0.00049667485,0.00024121997,0.00015909028,0.0014383319,0.000008708074],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00081901776,0.000098285585,0.022462888,0.00020849658,0.000096773576,0.000017083255,0.96845704,0.0000012149892,0.000079070094,0.0053019,0.0013480384,0.0011101894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018142789,0.0012775983,0.056033187,0.0018728778,0.000036625177,0.0000018486238,0.7435244,0.00002052434,0.00004745908,0.00065256516,0.19443122,0.00028743467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005606748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012034423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22493267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018142126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003711103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2830013","doi":"10.1016/0165-4608(88)90194-x","title":"Age discrimination and social benefits: the long retreat from Tétreault-Gadoury?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.053735649476628955,"score_gpt":0.4022646182884308,"score_spread":0.34852896881180184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2830013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95086086,0.0007983507,0.000021670143,0.03164663,0.00023963781,0.00014707532,0.000035660898,0.000019548446,0.016230542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97898376,0.00041750842,0.000023227074,0.011817454,0.0082397815,0.0000017362945,0.000011263117,0.0000133994545,0.0004918531],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853796,0.00033286467,0.00043387638,0.000112800524,0.00028048217,0.00030203717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908537,0.00016801964,0.00043212489,0.000059141697,0.00017072345,0.000084642175],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039930237,0.0001416677,0.00036767073,0.00006080451,0.0024137946,0.00006691992,0.00012576526,0.0002469568,0.000018601078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057410285,0.0000977188,0.00012149395,0.00007886717,0.00020087672,0.00024157416,0.000042146887,0.00057113444,0.000002802796],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001148178,0.00007895482,0.003970223,0.000052190906,0.00010561509,0.000035146208,0.6423595,1.5578043e-7,0.00008666727,0.3001168,0.005178342,0.04790157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028510375,0.0002917914,0.6815092,0.00024031034,0.00037548374,0.000010064541,0.14162317,0.0000052056976,0.000026615082,0.15205947,0.020614373,0.00039331513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006114698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024928453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67753893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012033168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012814648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988849},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891339806","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1315","title":"Domestic Violence and International Child Abduction at the Border of Canadian Family and Refugee Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Domestic violence; Convention; Law; Political science; Refugee law; Family law; International law; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.02154836251343113,"score_gpt":0.37272162442778695,"score_spread":0.3511732619143558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891339806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96563417,0.00076010625,0.0000041660264,0.011583533,0.00033414277,0.000047157417,0.000020358793,0.0000015809594,0.021614788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922869,0.0005020121,0.00001675824,0.0053174677,0.0017247896,7.4697283e-7,0.0000012505211,0.0000040852465,0.0001459735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994994,0.000049190487,0.00019458843,0.000062121115,0.00007744464,0.0001172916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995861,0.0000244625,0.00014225356,0.00003868058,0.00010493248,0.000103586244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020071925,0.00005046085,0.00009909647,0.00010504777,0.00034923255,0.000018183135,0.00004846196,0.0000620554,0.00003961584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000130358285,0.00003671362,0.000020072142,0.00006619883,0.00036084905,0.00006680015,0.000010302932,0.00010518149,0.0000018793263],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014317429,0.000029159673,0.0015406366,0.000018343439,0.00007971329,0.0000037521468,0.021913322,1.2792563e-7,0.0000783586,0.95609784,0.0021948495,0.01790072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018173362,0.00046559857,0.43569708,0.000099252575,0.000057742796,0.0006033543,0.0020834042,0.0000048478546,0.000024572184,0.029670704,0.52933276,0.00014335469],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1291904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1801997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9264271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032010834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007618889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8766084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895866880","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1310","title":"A Current Assessment of Legal Aid in Ontario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Government of Canada; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Legal service; Service provider; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Business; Per capita; Economic Justice; Certificate; Service (business); Inflation (cosmology); Duty; Public economics; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Law; Marketing; Sociology","score_opus":0.07901487436676469,"score_gpt":0.47999810925427805,"score_spread":0.40098323488751336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895866880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65583247,0.0000232977,0.000038756432,0.04963052,0.00065979816,0.00005675667,0.0000016662199,0.0000025909558,0.29375416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996679,0.00002208977,0.00024305236,0.0009051045,0.0017609637,5.4401613e-7,2.9717668e-7,0.0000019652555,0.00038696875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999257,0.000112954505,0.0002712959,0.000036612175,0.00021766598,0.00010443016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932563,0.000045029134,0.0002777576,0.00002504611,0.0002817203,0.000044799268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007540652,0.000035335743,0.00011451231,0.000109255765,0.00024605353,0.00006892672,0.00007654448,0.000038574497,0.00012257522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098802084,0.000032320986,0.000037903646,0.0001915969,0.00027322615,0.00047827617,0.000010904532,0.00030418386,0.0000010648943],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008200243,0.000100470694,0.0043266807,0.0000027319818,0.0000074695095,4.424183e-7,0.05176021,8.267611e-8,0.00002119364,0.9409854,0.000990876,0.0017962481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027712737,0.000064157204,0.0563115,0.000013170549,0.000008118895,0.0000017896377,0.0027078588,7.9340055e-7,0.000007534715,0.008155562,0.93241346,0.00003891134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42972937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48431888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93282986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024486097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041319877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7329969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902245668","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1330","title":"Ongoing Debates about Gambling Regulation In Brazil: Between Current News and Prospective Laws, An Uncertain Future Ahead","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04510703950683083,"score_gpt":0.41571814652705424,"score_spread":0.37061110702022343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902245668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9838148,0.00070041395,0.000022885835,0.008861532,0.00022836446,0.0001474113,0.0000048904813,0.000016948929,0.0062027615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98209786,0.00019888113,0.00015009707,0.0002390861,0.017246306,0.0000010049569,0.0000012550556,0.0000108719805,0.00005465365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986789,0.00025836573,0.0003329533,0.00014272609,0.00030078294,0.00028627354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992699,0.000054189528,0.00026567082,0.000047339046,0.0002111462,0.0001517348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076995406,0.000111018264,0.00028142813,0.00014737654,0.0007222745,0.00022873335,0.00012070502,0.00014568708,0.000009858216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094332805,0.00010104255,0.000048697224,0.0002643305,0.0005656719,0.00085262675,0.000028002141,0.0002775349,0.0000013779658],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009300425,0.000079751684,0.12932685,0.00004066345,0.00004016838,0.0000050642548,0.31701687,0.0000012922314,0.00012981422,0.45335796,0.0003962833,0.099512264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014862758,0.00041247692,0.7470936,0.00024440032,0.00005682247,0.0000062407635,0.022491558,0.000026068417,0.00019188385,0.10526248,0.12233493,0.00039326336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015418159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036331367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61776674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001804164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025142223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902825928","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1328","title":"Fifty Years of Legal Gambling in Canada: So What?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; CLARITY; Law; Political science; Politics; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08494422137818691,"score_gpt":0.41070080845354723,"score_spread":0.3257565870753603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902825928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9960194,0.00013296795,8.870276e-7,0.00065262185,0.00043258877,0.000024459338,0.000005575449,0.0000012909204,0.0027301735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986312,0.000021563817,0.00001971795,0.00045627877,0.0007594381,3.9885805e-7,4.3679574e-7,0.0000066817674,0.00010432776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935186,0.00004466882,0.00025553795,0.0000563501,0.00013502763,0.00015652993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996542,0.000021216196,0.00016344889,0.000046020108,0.000065166205,0.00004994833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012875388,0.000055200468,0.00019409269,0.000086310916,0.000058640086,0.00002995158,0.00006583346,0.00005293036,0.00003922316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008201408,0.000052356532,0.000049282466,0.00008179175,0.00011251578,0.00012776289,0.000012628094,0.000120435965,0.0000019005458],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010677682,0.0012923633,0.19404955,0.000058516045,0.0007812431,0.0015420882,0.11593935,0.0000026465368,0.0014379157,0.38494393,0.0056716516,0.29321298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025095278,0.00030939374,0.9744969,0.000052822015,0.00006152239,0.00008916678,0.0033074706,7.2176175e-7,0.00018528811,0.0011888612,0.017679784,0.00011856155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87783295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58567834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7804473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012366801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056476047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42188197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905482341","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1326","title":"All About That Place: The Curious Case of Bingo Liberalisation in Brazil","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Entertainment; Language change; Liberalization; Sociology; Sociality; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.10707996154023208,"score_gpt":0.45216737938508406,"score_spread":0.345087417844852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905482341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914485,0.00007455148,9.386255e-7,0.002580742,0.00022097527,0.00005137303,0.000007541219,0.000003007897,0.0056123533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997704,0.000014717433,0.000011059429,0.0012585436,0.00078186445,0.0000012134872,7.560534e-7,0.000007725888,0.0002200926],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994129,0.00008970805,0.00021883394,0.00005581256,0.000092281625,0.00013047653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995868,0.000036575155,0.00022383989,0.000062518375,0.000055883836,0.000034364653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023046717,0.000065734166,0.00015126358,0.000085044994,0.0001138193,0.00002327785,0.00006302319,0.00008219063,0.00003436945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075412436,0.00004434262,0.00006474097,0.000069952366,0.00018352886,0.00007204779,0.000012945936,0.00012623033,0.000004164747],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092557876,0.0014202514,0.0987503,0.0000374278,0.00056943303,0.0019514156,0.5274747,0.0000017154198,0.00053828355,0.33091208,0.009338299,0.028080517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010787733,0.0013337863,0.9282477,0.00008091672,0.00038719672,0.005298573,0.005431663,0.000005715203,0.00050567667,0.014961526,0.032626268,0.00033324325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010169729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001062544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8294974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034172233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004029621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99642164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908254244","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1322","title":"Law, Judges and Authorized Gambling in Italy: A Tale of Contradictions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Business; Consumer protection; Law; Service (business); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.10670524164495518,"score_gpt":0.43773418969615957,"score_spread":0.3310289480512044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908254244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98074317,0.00013457931,0.0000067730443,0.00090892526,0.0001824827,0.000046450255,0.000013048778,0.000004378281,0.017960211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893165,0.00001513764,0.00006275972,0.00021570468,0.0006245204,0.0000013512704,6.6808616e-7,0.000007320681,0.00014090931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939054,0.000059732905,0.00026321795,0.00006800802,0.000082208055,0.00013630444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963915,0.00003480049,0.00015763835,0.00004224533,0.00006994723,0.00005620039],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017829187,0.00006704008,0.00023474895,0.000119782046,0.00012942145,0.000020029054,0.000039644958,0.00008843646,0.000028250282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011693804,0.00005774751,0.000058869955,0.00008332709,0.0003087279,0.00007841542,0.000011326202,0.000112672315,0.0000016655821],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029532594,0.00052436255,0.028901935,0.000014069779,0.00021963744,0.000051903404,0.03163382,6.299246e-8,0.0024170487,0.9318385,0.0002637207,0.003839617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020917,0.002574794,0.9034608,0.00012274623,0.00056805747,0.0005328459,0.0060736807,0.0000052172245,0.001010464,0.04939118,0.014940831,0.0004023782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002620803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033524673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8824473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023961582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000032611195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39618877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29095352","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1050","title":"Flexibility and Feminization: The New Ontario Employment Standards Act","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminization (sociology); Flexibility (engineering); Business; Labour economics; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03766172758626456,"score_gpt":0.3683604813301207,"score_spread":0.33069875374385616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29095352","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8673743,0.00016120783,0.000059496786,0.055568308,0.00020087743,0.00010283163,0.0000096257245,0.000007424701,0.076515935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98925126,0.0003307184,0.000027923343,0.0038879076,0.0019960965,2.7385647e-7,3.318671e-7,0.0000034590832,0.004502056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991917,0.00008412697,0.00017570652,0.00005551383,0.00035042944,0.00014253033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954814,0.000031638436,0.000121992234,0.000040745716,0.00014505636,0.00011245099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074586505,0.000052562486,0.000114497925,0.0000214034,0.0009381212,0.00014110828,0.00008688501,0.000048848033,0.00012211656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050013554,0.00003399078,0.00004252918,0.0000959073,0.00023473885,0.00016864805,0.000025685778,0.00011675562,1.109623e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002493743,0.00003091104,0.0050101858,8.11817e-7,0.00003057485,0.0000023705077,0.07368368,4.1841437e-7,0.0000053587723,0.9038346,0.0038919586,0.013484221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031999915,0.00004817337,0.08242939,0.000005431735,0.00001787941,0.0000026542173,0.0017994907,1.3655587e-7,0.000002889514,0.020296395,0.89503497,0.000042578366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20876321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30564037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025723656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012809128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7965057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911722754","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1313","title":"Physicians, Nurse Practitioners and ODSP Applications: Towards a New Model of Partnership with Community Legal Clinics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; General partnership; Health professionals; Health care; Work (physics); Nursing; Test (biology); Order (exchange); Legal profession; Task (project management); Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Business; Law; Psychiatry; Management","score_opus":0.10815991247699112,"score_gpt":0.4601460141389525,"score_spread":0.35198610166196137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911722754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28638577,0.00011074368,0.0036967732,0.26635712,0.00017735762,0.00039363376,0.000028398617,0.0000288825,0.4428213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99081975,0.00008430232,0.0015713283,0.0047050803,0.0020146747,0.0000026294817,0.0000020268578,0.0000056658578,0.0007945575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911755,0.00023949218,0.0002592902,0.000048601538,0.00022208923,0.00011294606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867445,0.00012625859,0.0005277147,0.000065984896,0.00051686604,0.00008869631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008659822,0.000058509122,0.00014902648,0.00006777578,0.00091280765,0.000117932745,0.00010768907,0.00007168656,0.0000077450295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016364476,0.00005208959,0.000034778648,0.00026190587,0.0008458858,0.0008580677,0.000010365688,0.00038864266,9.555059e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000547957,0.00013423899,0.00006758037,0.000010250896,0.000032208627,1.0268389e-7,0.07999711,0.0000014476442,0.000030671486,0.9093389,0.0021017091,0.008230966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009543359,0.00034211768,0.00096913375,0.00004859703,0.0001351934,0.000009922931,0.08213995,0.000042686384,0.000067765475,0.09161078,0.8234972,0.0001823532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018327551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030914587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82139546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048026304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022144187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9882095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912849018","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1321","title":"Risk, Charity, and Boundary Disputes: The Liberalisation and Commercialisation of Online Bingo in the European Union","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Liberalization; European union; Order (exchange); Business; Profit (economics); Corporate governance; Reading (process); Market economy; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law; International trade; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.10505654428950473,"score_gpt":0.41385371332328114,"score_spread":0.3087971690337764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912849018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99132466,0.000097414086,0.000009300576,0.006383753,0.00009642011,0.00006103147,0.00001958141,0.0000019341028,0.0020059235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983935,0.00010256637,0.000015150123,0.0006536574,0.00080747064,4.329546e-7,0.000004548202,0.0000054298775,0.0000172582],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987962,0.00078662374,0.00019899894,0.00005153073,0.000091996095,0.00007464652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959403,0.00006761117,0.00021840444,0.000052630578,0.000047776546,0.000019574061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010170077,0.000055960703,0.000106974025,0.00005692011,0.0002694357,0.00004712748,0.000063079715,0.0000380352,0.0000031936518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018328361,0.00003247541,0.000025259,0.00007019254,0.0003526974,0.00008089137,0.000021162152,0.00014550069,3.8530325e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013293196,0.0007277739,0.36703163,0.000021202844,0.00013264471,0.000014868244,0.35507518,1.03344725e-7,0.00025787723,0.0770683,0.0008161788,0.19872129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007879257,0.00020115069,0.99124503,0.000012004605,0.000053374864,0.00002655911,0.0013346935,0.0000011771534,0.0000057953307,0.0042250697,0.0020767786,0.000030461162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061967825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011261948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6242134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000117807795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017271946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9367723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917351143","doi":"","title":"Learning, Teaching & Practising Systemic Advocacy in Legal Clinics: A Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Sociology; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.04070611120915998,"score_gpt":0.44216053812495226,"score_spread":0.4014544269157923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917351143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7713203,0.000033256056,0.00008823412,0.07620375,0.00066716655,0.00008581267,4.9501983e-7,0.0000140430075,0.15158695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99138504,0.000048887498,0.0001561433,0.0023462388,0.005395987,6.47091e-7,5.325573e-7,0.000005302344,0.00066119415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985748,0.0006104948,0.000377549,0.00006238735,0.0002259346,0.0001488552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880296,0.00023164642,0.00059250684,0.000027773352,0.00028967034,0.000055428958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026380867,0.000050946306,0.00013327289,0.00016159442,0.00088696246,0.00026445967,0.00007900795,0.00009127499,0.00003002092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018679922,0.000050858118,0.00004111761,0.00019287464,0.00023118583,0.0013768811,0.000011379458,0.0006807332,0.000008475215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002876474,0.000047329617,0.0016482132,0.0000072713406,0.000013866458,0.0000023995938,0.3034747,6.911413e-7,0.000073666575,0.6855172,0.0006185795,0.008567333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053652143,0.00013557961,0.0024353745,0.00005429895,0.000019805404,0.00003562067,0.10260423,0.000014030234,0.0000064919454,0.0038183518,0.8902456,0.00009407388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029856011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014848481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88962704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019480324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016782259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9766043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919810910","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1314","title":"The Disability Tax Credit: Exploring Attitudes, Perceptions, and Beliefs About Disability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Medical model of disability; Perception; Disability benefits; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Public economics; Social psychology; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05433885309137197,"score_gpt":0.3558586436122912,"score_spread":0.3015197905209192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919810910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821756,0.00020121275,0.000022941367,0.011249194,0.0005141026,0.00009240934,0.00002169017,0.0000132900195,0.0057095517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890287,0.0015971032,0.000095204545,0.00042636658,0.008711132,0.0000031900818,5.5035093e-7,0.0000074778945,0.00013029049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857855,0.00028283437,0.00033676848,0.00013177906,0.00035298997,0.000317063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991817,0.00017577466,0.00016337051,0.00010582125,0.00020156664,0.00017180554],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00144311,0.00010544737,0.00020581957,0.000014816595,0.0031555032,0.00022654947,0.00019837868,0.000088288245,0.00001344071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023089808,0.00007648964,0.00010116791,0.0001229062,0.004874895,0.0003820841,0.00006890152,0.00022974875,0.0000018673367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038182086,0.00015113971,0.31082338,0.000027863403,0.000049836275,8.574674e-7,0.11438673,2.2150611e-7,0.000034749755,0.5635241,0.00083095714,0.010131952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027392062,0.000078373276,0.8998473,0.000012538789,0.000022308568,0.000003068312,0.026508506,0.0000031356974,9.4578473e-7,0.024513803,0.048623778,0.000112313486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013343964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022763385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58902395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020560938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018763219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920071827","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1329","title":"Playing Bingo with Mum - and Dad!","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Sociology; Local community; Psychology; Media studies; Advertising; Public relations; Political science; Business; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.08844580374561221,"score_gpt":0.4234090248628866,"score_spread":0.3349632211172744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920071827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97757965,0.00004875566,0.000007766678,0.00072476803,0.00012286339,0.000025724796,0.000003366769,0.000005205179,0.021481885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977537,0.0000058762053,0.00009515767,0.0005614817,0.0012858048,5.915498e-7,3.3231674e-7,0.000008839673,0.00028822775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995657,0.000028909464,0.00012226804,0.0000640073,0.00008348869,0.00013557644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972194,0.00001435817,0.000110069035,0.00003783538,0.00005245967,0.0000633111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008918375,0.0000663866,0.00013821949,0.000064859676,0.00022670007,0.000037823393,0.000036609574,0.000058462145,0.000025016583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003281497,0.00004702131,0.000027258466,0.00004704037,0.000197039,0.00006694112,0.00001195433,0.00009565303,0.0000048590136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011426278,0.00076824997,0.29373515,0.00003351125,0.0009442379,0.00048125433,0.119310066,5.9743996e-8,0.0021439632,0.5345713,0.0028324977,0.044037104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006221408,0.0022385009,0.9674426,0.00005034934,0.00029619478,0.0010365502,0.0016968824,7.159925e-7,0.00017386267,0.0034822084,0.017106852,0.00025389018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001142289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000060804294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6737074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015494265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028230324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19174732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924755370","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1345","title":"Issue 2: Tax, Race, and Child Poverty: The Case for Improving the Canada Child Benefit Program","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Racialization; Child poverty; Race (biology); Indigenous; Welfare; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.009685618873354646,"score_gpt":0.2782486917139486,"score_spread":0.268563072840594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924755370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87750983,0.0007348752,0.000008319428,0.093113154,0.0007216888,0.0007270839,0.00008488643,0.000010915771,0.02708925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872428,0.00017758942,0.000041317042,0.008625517,0.0030911295,0.0000045606716,8.59117e-7,0.000010782264,0.00080542936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990788,0.000072371826,0.00021343546,0.0000940532,0.000236648,0.0003046951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993447,0.00011015807,0.00023263576,0.00007338957,0.00013795329,0.00010112849],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006045582,0.00010109997,0.00019605772,0.000023915845,0.0021530604,0.0002069695,0.00018254446,0.00008742293,0.0000047225576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006202056,0.00005940478,0.00007968967,0.000109581284,0.0002117093,0.00014131788,0.00003949848,0.00024769787,2.8223837e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060540962,0.00008348531,0.0028845991,0.000090893904,0.00016977072,0.00004293816,0.07997347,0.0000087324215,0.000011265278,0.8660332,0.007611438,0.043029685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012988431,0.00024107724,0.013516195,0.000028088642,0.00013374099,0.00037824176,0.078008614,0.00015075279,0.0000039064244,0.006995741,0.89896756,0.0002772074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6472498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7440085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89135617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009475052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005118413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927540772","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1325","title":"Beyond the Figure of the Problem Gambler: Locating Race and Sovereignty Struggles in Everyday Cultural Spaces of Gambling","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sovereignty; Biopower; Sociology; Entitlement (fair division); Indigenous; Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Scholarship; Gender studies; Political economy; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07265644801839552,"score_gpt":0.39923771071595615,"score_spread":0.3265812626975606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927540772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9892729,0.00030967314,0.0000011378332,0.0015144069,0.000103141545,0.00009391461,0.000011363899,0.0000019209685,0.008691546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990891,0.000031921933,0.00007634463,0.00015583904,0.00043132264,0.0000012515021,3.9177468e-7,0.0000072541616,0.0002065664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911785,0.00013512275,0.00033731572,0.00007940364,0.00017136057,0.00015895121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921435,0.00006934473,0.00046667288,0.000077661614,0.000142531,0.000029438123],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031485074,0.00009629366,0.0002479642,0.000051169256,0.00019306225,0.000030641324,0.00012749733,0.00008785043,0.000022289621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002028589,0.000050961982,0.00008196023,0.00013589783,0.00043081067,0.00010117097,0.000043054497,0.00018496506,4.398339e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004503315,0.0005833447,0.21000011,0.00014556362,0.000499265,0.000013568842,0.24684273,0.000007867503,0.0062929625,0.5156505,0.0012119887,0.018301783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059358343,0.0009580843,0.90023124,0.000393878,0.00039184772,0.00019905032,0.034339868,0.000009087119,0.005287024,0.0499307,0.002003877,0.00031950124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017766262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022404893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69023114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002313771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060693685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2685739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927743958","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1344","title":"Issue 2: Imagining a Community-Led, Multi-Service Delivery Model for Ontario Child Welfare: A Framework for Collaboration Among African Canadian Community Partners","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Welfare; Service delivery framework; Government (linguistics); Social Welfare; Economic growth; Community service; Public relations; Political science; Service (business); Sociology; Business; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.07597918330054897,"score_gpt":0.4273454396025108,"score_spread":0.35136625630196183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927743958","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749414,0.000039710445,0.00074062124,0.015908023,0.00040086423,0.0010108426,0.00021684781,0.00001746131,0.006724248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99327976,0.000014055642,0.0018172521,0.0035993191,0.000913683,0.00005780996,0.000035384845,0.000035604855,0.0002471389],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791366,0.00078040705,0.0005607157,0.00008236778,0.00015534241,0.00050750683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975449,0.0005135581,0.00053943606,0.00016254834,0.0009520624,0.00028751872],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013865888,0.00017442022,0.0006461075,0.00014628563,0.0070196968,0.00008293595,0.00028773447,0.00037788882,0.00002373933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001621941,0.00016989827,0.00013058257,0.00019404152,0.00010593897,0.0003757155,0.000064785454,0.0018381205,0.000002864961],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018370149,0.00010055177,0.0073762033,0.00031364444,0.000103342405,5.5151855e-7,0.8222562,0.000059752958,0.0000055903056,0.16917065,0.000103936014,0.0003258441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036853545,0.000244345,0.01228354,0.000377083,0.00013592724,4.901721e-7,0.9031223,0.0028426223,0.0000043397617,0.015271666,0.06165758,0.00037471656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95816386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99709517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15389898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077583897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016102458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935821001","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1323","title":"A Tale of Two Casinos: Unequal Spaces of Local Governance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Local governance; Work (physics); Downtown; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Local government; Management; Economics; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.07219691508155758,"score_gpt":0.4351783135729661,"score_spread":0.36298139849140854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935821001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98848987,0.00013829581,0.000038327547,0.00038447423,0.0002253868,0.000028102566,0.000033625092,0.000002195833,0.010659726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987259,0.000010859827,0.000060441515,0.00011641833,0.0008193167,3.659249e-7,3.8871653e-7,0.0000072553967,0.00025907048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932057,0.00005237577,0.00027934616,0.000059939743,0.00015652804,0.00013125698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999327,0.000023405864,0.00041341333,0.000058854355,0.00013173037,0.000045620047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011625114,0.00007088996,0.0002546467,0.00004067837,0.000063662534,0.000008077533,0.0000754754,0.00006709549,0.000060484203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000069097664,0.000057772806,0.00009738494,0.000074171105,0.00046448974,0.00005937375,0.000016525008,0.000086731285,0.0000040839946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006477056,0.0012001056,0.03032853,0.00004633914,0.00045959756,0.000109708686,0.037441213,0.0000010322143,0.002878525,0.8996865,0.0016295959,0.02557115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.020448927,0.007561063,0.89990884,0.00025952328,0.0008640783,0.00054081687,0.008146274,0.0000046985633,0.020262046,0.019955713,0.02145898,0.00058905274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008196529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028791587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87973076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028029339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000068334135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99840796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940978286","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1327","title":"First Nations Gaming in Canada: Gauging Past and Ongoing Development","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Negotiation; Lottery; Nova scotia; Sovereignty; Political science; Economic growth; Business; Law; Public administration; Finance; Economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06520517162578966,"score_gpt":0.3729215595590984,"score_spread":0.30771638793330874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940978286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99070513,0.00004723357,0.0000070467077,0.0009831124,0.00015334522,0.000027257882,0.0000019576348,0.000001906378,0.008073028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990067,0.000006637535,0.00012238171,0.0002569975,0.00051971513,0.0000012233108,4.219499e-7,0.000005669035,0.00008027847],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994829,0.000021751628,0.00019769958,0.00005829907,0.00009182476,0.00014748191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997446,0.000039185372,0.00009739421,0.000023084813,0.000044766875,0.00005097648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001022749,0.00005746738,0.00011798171,0.000120867946,0.00034998596,0.00002142095,0.00003381329,0.000031778807,0.000019082603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010281333,0.00005249616,0.000014565354,0.00007822328,0.000047556307,0.00005086351,0.000015142656,0.00008305617,0.0000010977338],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008124317,0.00027598144,0.7057029,0.000046307796,0.0002571373,0.00029140868,0.13858658,0.0000012386298,0.00009421466,0.1084988,0.0006399332,0.04552425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085985044,0.000036953956,0.98953944,0.00004163979,0.0000164241,0.00006130761,0.0014609167,7.8004956e-7,0.00002625131,0.00014376317,0.0077445186,0.00006812026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56803346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9004717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33243823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024486022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033338758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43484303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941199743","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1331","title":"\"I've always been outspoken on what I think can be improved\": An Interview with Dr. Garry J. Smith","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11684170794780335,"score_gpt":0.42002901064364967,"score_spread":0.3031873026958463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941199743","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98376876,0.00016081835,0.000004924886,0.007917804,0.00047710413,0.000119475844,0.00002543263,0.000019320685,0.007506334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990319,0.00006262519,0.00005480506,0.0064921966,0.0022619169,0.0000028273794,0.000003930187,0.000029942259,0.0007727384],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890363,0.00015585321,0.00028553634,0.0001674781,0.00019267894,0.00029483074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992395,0.000020775331,0.0002417655,0.00016249488,0.00015371715,0.00018172602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026628235,0.00018279438,0.00033954834,0.0001137007,0.0002844129,0.00016054465,0.00017560748,0.00014517849,0.00007313965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000048962565,0.00012719439,0.000112115835,0.000078283,0.0002545111,0.00027887386,0.000026515909,0.00028391927,0.00001015146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027351526,0.0037330994,0.0068689943,0.00009102398,0.0022829012,0.00064327446,0.58744967,3.344151e-7,0.0008262972,0.11334746,0.00958718,0.27243462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.04021917,0.07210697,0.61882514,0.0016018644,0.0034504768,0.0022830481,0.081279576,0.000009189908,0.0025340708,0.020158198,0.15454637,0.0029859268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024067445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008505352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6119561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008556611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011462162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5186837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941394133","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1320","title":"Regulation and Resistance in Canadian Bingo Halls: A Socio-Legal Account","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Speculation; Profit (economics); Happening; Cash; Sociology; Public relations; Advertising; Political science; Business; Economics; History","score_opus":0.055050130790874396,"score_gpt":0.3935478134311602,"score_spread":0.3384976826402858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941394133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96647674,0.00011439873,9.138329e-7,0.0038637233,0.00014803543,0.000038030204,0.000008082466,0.0000027832446,0.029347284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976386,0.000008497524,0.000060054,0.0006683537,0.0009290713,0.0000010390457,8.4990546e-7,0.000007397316,0.00068615424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994139,0.000047975744,0.00017874884,0.00007447771,0.00008519726,0.00019970356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967283,0.000012812298,0.00010505627,0.000041777737,0.000066556786,0.000100958525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002025795,0.000063747626,0.00013529194,0.0001502402,0.0001893258,0.000046627392,0.000041520394,0.00009985869,0.000027950142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009786262,0.00005799654,0.000030618008,0.00007372418,0.00014571277,0.000107007996,0.0000065295653,0.00010344352,0.0000043147293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018468867,0.00011327788,0.06843656,0.000011305663,0.00008197153,0.00011651396,0.038233045,2.5809548e-8,0.00019871186,0.88694173,0.0024001496,0.0032820336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012457534,0.000105251915,0.9496823,0.000020740215,0.000029488558,0.000037400143,0.00043264046,2.7634857e-7,0.0000084255435,0.011179082,0.03718096,0.00007766775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3254858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43351147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88124573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015731227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016519602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67900586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942032744","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1324","title":"Online Gambling, Regulation, and Risks: A Comparison of Gambling Policies in Finland and the Netherlands","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos","keywords":"Legislature; Monopoly; Business; European union; Public economics; Politics; Alibi; Political science; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; International trade","score_opus":0.21232727128167866,"score_gpt":0.4986037706741894,"score_spread":0.2862764993925107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942032744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99594074,0.0006575201,0.000010862191,0.0017219589,0.00008436826,0.00006770143,0.000010463658,0.0000026245546,0.0015037372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99868083,0.000080205034,0.000059209015,0.00022799846,0.0008270734,9.5237533e-7,0.0000013485502,0.000008356182,0.00011400707],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991179,0.00013459948,0.00040066766,0.00008084172,0.000119280914,0.000146691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993605,0.000106002226,0.00032661998,0.00006223499,0.00009997435,0.00004465045],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003839485,0.00009376351,0.00034504294,0.00014875573,0.0001627195,0.00003645562,0.00005735315,0.00009630119,0.000012273411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029857363,0.00006133943,0.000046462876,0.00011270966,0.00056963065,0.000059621012,0.000025514928,0.00015535956,4.656338e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011699795,0.00057393004,0.75331545,0.000028904158,0.00021624306,0.0000068166983,0.14945328,0.0000023695522,0.0001672477,0.08410254,0.00047655217,0.010486663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006729792,0.000339775,0.982941,0.000040284518,0.00010171327,0.00004719485,0.002536183,0.000033279674,0.000043363976,0.0059083975,0.0012052659,0.00007380797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053424346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007884894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22962548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013745718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028729253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8076198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942856087","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1346","title":"Issue 2: How We Can “Bell the Cat”: African Canadian Perspectives of the Canadian Child Welfare System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Refugee; Obligation; Welfare; Immigration; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Art","score_opus":0.008860416205719535,"score_gpt":0.24728859840425696,"score_spread":0.23842818219853743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942856087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09584486,0.00020266861,8.659214e-8,0.6824964,0.00035445672,0.00018820738,0.000059429978,0.000004126789,0.22084977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580586,0.00007196607,0.0000020952964,0.0010303701,0.0023429664,6.3305487e-7,4.7491903e-7,0.00000825659,0.00073739304],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889153,0.00022537907,0.00016305975,0.00008218437,0.0003195515,0.00031832192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991857,0.000023816825,0.00023556332,0.00009742917,0.0001893061,0.00026821424],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044936012,0.00009021086,0.00019875709,0.00011289883,0.002740803,0.00013520877,0.00032697167,0.00011143252,0.000033681965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004140346,0.00005653898,0.00014594529,0.00025370863,0.00038727064,0.000109545734,0.00001702723,0.00022714825,0.0000019313889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003654964,0.000006944736,0.00058275653,0.000016016966,0.000040734547,0.000002438277,0.19686334,0.0000016000781,0.000004402708,0.80081624,0.0010415233,0.0006203765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017949902,0.00003157528,0.018824168,0.00005186607,0.00003475293,0.000014692104,0.29620188,0.0000013168299,0.0000070331052,0.00043034324,0.6841281,0.00009475793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99090624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99778956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.899961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009479462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018027059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951686383","doi":"","title":"Reimagining Child Welfare Systems in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Research in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare system; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.036909920160385384,"score_gpt":0.38089399749435043,"score_spread":0.3439840773339651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951686383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17730346,0.00021668155,0.0000029700022,0.12269662,0.0010768546,0.0001271251,0.000006738621,0.0000075184316,0.698562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928936,0.000090048576,0.000015202721,0.00065959437,0.0061918534,8.323689e-7,8.951025e-8,0.0000042146444,0.00014456359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813193,0.00032002898,0.00028519612,0.00008168893,0.0007814599,0.0003996946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993024,0.000058048103,0.00019711941,0.00003579451,0.00022487268,0.00018176215],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015685059,0.000060701324,0.00019970007,0.0000859706,0.001633402,0.00016385676,0.0002968084,0.000055802473,0.000036398564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002638579,0.000047012116,0.00003773713,0.00036407466,0.0008808532,0.0003432391,0.00003771567,0.0002676609,0.0000012181969],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013207555,0.000012227149,0.004448016,0.000009064861,0.000013246857,0.000027103395,0.0422893,8.630899e-7,0.00000668883,0.94373894,0.002653825,0.0067874915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028421657,0.000054404612,0.01557694,0.000041154108,0.000004101483,0.000008525591,0.05158432,0.000008289546,0.0000045871607,0.0030717135,0.9292508,0.00011099623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99546576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9406673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007785931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029529042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952186493","doi":"","title":"Reimagining Child Welfare Systems in Canada – Part II","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Research in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare system; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.040200266660255,"score_gpt":0.37364735461715887,"score_spread":0.33344708795690386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952186493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2513332,0.00022992214,0.0000011584426,0.1379827,0.0014142236,0.00013677528,0.000009586249,0.000008516489,0.6088839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9905141,0.00011935105,0.000011120857,0.00073899364,0.008292327,0.0000012376981,1.4681983e-7,0.0000047254257,0.0003179879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794245,0.000330935,0.00032664344,0.00009522853,0.0008497867,0.0004549673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999234,0.00005271515,0.0002272741,0.00004219776,0.00023458283,0.00020922805],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017678296,0.00007002809,0.00022509643,0.00008250729,0.0028472263,0.00014807718,0.000317766,0.000063544474,0.000052545663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028315381,0.000054570355,0.000044064782,0.00038004245,0.0009401079,0.00037201747,0.000061520775,0.00028788933,0.0000010734284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014998335,0.000019067234,0.0032415246,0.000009233828,0.00001705391,0.00002586336,0.049805615,0.0000010032164,0.000004485773,0.93331885,0.0073923278,0.006149968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020867122,0.000059909973,0.0049398215,0.00003720978,0.000003523933,0.0000055633495,0.029008983,0.000004590548,0.0000032110083,0.0018731139,0.9637686,0.00008678046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9915697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9807779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073902466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029932286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973293400","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1364","title":"State Redress as Public Policy: A Two-Sided Coin","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; State (computer science); Political science; Social policy; Law and economics; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03722263031627999,"score_gpt":0.39771024542437644,"score_spread":0.36048761510809646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973293400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88474804,0.0001653888,0.00000809898,0.024132634,0.00033210265,0.00011972483,0.000017952048,0.000012408484,0.09046364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98221827,0.000055612807,0.000023118391,0.011044657,0.0030144802,0.0000021855121,0.0000029904934,0.000016921496,0.003621785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858946,0.00020642186,0.00046469798,0.00011593121,0.0002219445,0.00040154578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901295,0.00007294319,0.0003814601,0.00010745669,0.00016706595,0.0002581405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045898973,0.00011480007,0.0003077557,0.00023657047,0.0002025198,0.00007931281,0.00013342303,0.000107270054,0.00028852475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059058922,0.00009963019,0.0001099904,0.00018482443,0.000098589444,0.00019285135,0.000019727664,0.0002938036,0.000137846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018698274,0.00009831392,0.0012129637,0.000024430008,0.00008830541,0.000017974464,0.03027966,3.7324824e-7,0.00009277464,0.9558171,0.006496117,0.0056849895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.015438615,0.0017703155,0.14048192,0.00007945544,0.000075495656,0.0009969582,0.00599071,0.000009395226,0.00011625039,0.26116702,0.5732147,0.00065914914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020635972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014201967,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6946501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007888612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006838746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9858857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974507081","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1368","title":"Becoming and Building Community in Toronto: 1980 to Present","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Caribbean history, culture, and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Media studies; History; Law","score_opus":0.03681716124125988,"score_gpt":0.37119948693682736,"score_spread":0.3343823256955675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974507081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.891574,0.00023855409,0.0000020638745,0.0028751804,0.00020370627,0.00007247589,0.0000047178014,0.0000037674677,0.10502552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960084,0.00008272409,0.00007320986,0.0016418849,0.001624062,3.9759098e-7,1.9947642e-7,0.000004738454,0.000564382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991411,0.00025054353,0.00018990654,0.00004486695,0.00017213161,0.00020143628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956894,0.00009197797,0.00009665876,0.000044105615,0.000060283655,0.0001380344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007599368,0.00005990027,0.00019123196,0.000039536677,0.00050524366,0.00006784121,0.00011467281,0.00007924356,0.000015660276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006293867,0.00005717425,0.000050221835,0.000049559425,0.00013494809,0.00020348166,0.000042560583,0.00022817415,9.5115536e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014192953,0.000028263294,0.0010309435,0.000015397813,0.000010048305,0.0000015994549,0.22647126,8.138021e-7,0.00016200187,0.77049166,0.0007329497,0.0010408751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009142812,0.00016367363,0.01829009,0.000065435255,0.000023609366,0.000009740954,0.10711643,0.0000027553647,0.000035461777,0.013126516,0.86003625,0.00021576956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24745557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07489181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8593033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004617793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014025658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.941989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977458346","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1342","title":"Issue 2: Reimagining Child Welfare Systems in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Research in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare system; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022483457909451054,"score_gpt":0.3580449994807145,"score_spread":0.33556154157126344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977458346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2612667,0.00031186594,5.8911587e-7,0.1193616,0.0013085153,0.00018833188,0.0000067285864,0.0000062582853,0.6175494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99578756,0.00013538642,0.000008990749,0.0006719546,0.0028020125,8.958095e-7,1.5318514e-7,0.0000050302237,0.00058804156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980069,0.00032313334,0.00030133195,0.000092586575,0.00087020703,0.0004058368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935657,0.00007896379,0.00021290896,0.000043208045,0.00013679516,0.00017156273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014767792,0.00006821237,0.0002534822,0.00008907845,0.0007979392,0.00016585596,0.0003147004,0.00006370987,0.000095175754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016127163,0.000053470216,0.000046440768,0.0003321135,0.00028582124,0.00039900182,0.000038900747,0.00034667592,0.0000045792494],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016714344,0.000018137454,0.017047929,0.00003168162,0.000020554922,0.000034272944,0.04491064,0.000013911266,0.000013072041,0.9283834,0.0029218977,0.006587802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029868857,0.000030535204,0.012823913,0.000044647124,0.0000030570818,0.000005323555,0.060777944,0.000008802036,0.0000021891444,0.0011289021,0.92477405,0.000101933685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99440473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9488158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082468515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026397586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6137184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979960706","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1363","title":"Racism and Relief Distribution in the Aftermath of the Halifax Explosion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Commission; Compensation (psychology); Racism; Nova (rocket); Skepticism; Distribution (mathematics); Poor relief; Political science; Criminology; History; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Ethnology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.011496378614846717,"score_gpt":0.26534788394445,"score_spread":0.2538515053296033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979960706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749366,0.00019642798,0.0000011807109,0.01531898,0.0001258762,0.000057205074,0.000016065931,8.602085e-7,0.009346787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983557,0.0002574731,0.0000010643323,0.0007244431,0.00038412443,3.0277982e-7,3.300689e-7,0.0000013403552,0.000275207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944323,0.00014163447,0.00012870326,0.00002818014,0.00018144045,0.00007679204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974895,0.00003013579,0.0001295658,0.00003238874,0.00003267337,0.000026312786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048099077,0.000025044938,0.00008469386,0.000045201574,0.00039895714,0.00007528333,0.00009505412,0.000047140133,0.000007580135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003699745,0.000017764898,0.000047807946,0.00008739569,0.00034208706,0.00013748472,0.00001360541,0.00010973273,8.3563066e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000212224,0.00003515513,0.0011398175,0.00002138636,0.0000065397467,0.0000027413296,0.12749529,2.8068845e-7,0.00016269776,0.8629208,0.0054881293,0.002705928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004043161,0.000040640705,0.08780216,0.000044195716,0.000016651726,0.000008390655,0.008290298,9.342492e-7,0.000007788997,0.014595476,0.88873416,0.000054988668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1487905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13987896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.883246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001228395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002270517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.875816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993690901","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1367","title":"“All Arabs Are Liars”: Arab and Muslim Stereotypes in Canadian Human Rights Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Terrorism; Racialization; Conviction; Tribunal; Political science; Existentialism; Citizenship; Islam; Law; Islamophobia; Sociology; Criminology; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03567727920030854,"score_gpt":0.3483544763090948,"score_spread":0.3126771971087862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993690901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8967196,0.00009313373,7.351122e-8,0.0143070975,0.00011094142,0.000073222225,0.0000052776,0.000004030119,0.088686645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958629,0.00004307997,0.000008724119,0.0024389387,0.001113413,5.0035294e-7,4.3376897e-7,0.000005778953,0.0005262318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890274,0.00012920966,0.00025115264,0.00010655168,0.00023054605,0.00037980097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935526,0.000052171254,0.00016812238,0.000050301158,0.000078802375,0.00029535202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006052206,0.00009388104,0.00026059363,0.00012009999,0.0007904908,0.00015076384,0.00014856397,0.00012922935,0.000034503995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019378112,0.00008271603,0.00006080816,0.00008680937,0.00034709374,0.00036213853,0.00002037218,0.00022645669,0.000008236915],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014060207,0.000016959764,0.0027092097,0.000020375153,0.000013728313,0.000037579666,0.037137482,2.741846e-7,0.000034052104,0.9595104,0.0003639797,0.0001419285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078231253,0.00015777894,0.048255026,0.00016458597,0.00004000042,0.00002293486,0.01058247,0.0000020269588,0.000019370735,0.06638613,0.87329507,0.0002922849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91696405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9762766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8931242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019029202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002015449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6079896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013037630","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1376","title":"A Snapshot of the Law in the Streets: Reflections of a Former Parkdale Academic Director","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Legal education; Sociology; Experiential learning; Law; Reflection (computer programming); Context (archaeology); Snapshot (computer storage); Political science; History","score_opus":0.12523979684065978,"score_gpt":0.4591753507229872,"score_spread":0.33393555388232743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013037630","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3176078,0.00007698344,0.0000035858147,0.47462842,0.00016303612,0.0001134367,0.000013701883,0.0000023000684,0.20739074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98896074,0.000071237686,0.000024665042,0.009909444,0.00097164063,0.0000014786124,3.2439453e-7,0.0000022501565,0.00005824558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990628,0.0002680016,0.00030511105,0.000034808745,0.00023778643,0.00009154151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992291,0.00018509311,0.00037944273,0.00003451526,0.00013942977,0.00003245794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006337129,0.000037250975,0.00011371041,0.00003383338,0.00036902263,0.000028278175,0.00018809055,0.00006534217,0.00004152374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046239243,0.000022965143,0.00007113257,0.00054611376,0.00035069344,0.00030883923,0.000013351209,0.0004218817,3.0057973e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000142525105,0.000035829093,0.000372812,0.0000066159123,0.000012751351,1.15128415e-7,0.17113586,4.4860641e-7,0.00045194142,0.8254085,0.0023362932,0.00022457015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003476011,0.00007277227,0.0069156014,0.000022895665,0.000041451505,0.000003304603,0.053093616,0.0000012151351,0.00027028823,0.021776753,0.9173937,0.00006080729],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014999149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064958343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9150574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032443586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062575086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99156004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013073302","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1382","title":"Reflecting on Clinical Legal Education at the Indigenous Community Legal Clinic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal education; Political science; Legal research; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.323329263932597,"score_gpt":0.5754932380771438,"score_spread":0.25216397414454683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013073302","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49443308,0.000030865376,0.0000029266316,0.31159374,0.0005762393,0.00007635552,0.0000023271398,0.0000089473015,0.19327554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9232698,0.00007975726,0.000042578577,0.06652008,0.008180928,0.0000012796464,0.0000017235938,0.0000064782653,0.0018973697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974727,0.0015036779,0.00051582156,0.000063523476,0.00028366278,0.00016058328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981254,0.0007657806,0.0006090803,0.00007030027,0.0002906744,0.0001388143],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029991886,0.000067003166,0.00016563776,0.00004368496,0.0035573712,0.0002901613,0.00023003288,0.00011279698,0.00009145135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021672968,0.000051310893,0.00011454762,0.00030574593,0.00040154287,0.0005107521,0.00003873329,0.001452249,0.000031211388],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013019089,0.00035897878,0.0007539428,0.000008304521,0.0000557,0.0000014166462,0.2446212,3.9167e-7,0.000025242722,0.69989043,0.03320353,0.020950656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020097468,0.00023493222,0.002950628,0.000006515027,0.00002536859,0.0000074942454,0.029522695,2.1936678e-7,0.0000067933297,0.0022314347,0.96475154,0.00006141932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028435044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047174348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.931548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015979908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003615087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99773985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013151357","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1381","title":"Clinical Legal Education on the Ground: A Conversation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Communication","score_opus":0.13225084064314827,"score_gpt":0.4753807570936605,"score_spread":0.3431299164505123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013151357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12552743,0.000009294193,0.000015761007,0.7626596,0.0004410279,0.000057201498,0.000001003982,0.000005304647,0.111283384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90115035,0.000046806734,0.000047567893,0.090518445,0.007923812,9.601355e-7,6.344559e-7,0.000002818187,0.00030863108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990431,0.0003524437,0.00026420847,0.00004753635,0.00021512025,0.000077594166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990741,0.00026997103,0.00030704937,0.00002702456,0.00023883018,0.00008304753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009717381,0.000038048558,0.000086519925,0.000030372681,0.000590117,0.00020975502,0.00009792908,0.00005992891,0.000065478845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010583014,0.00002789859,0.000061708364,0.00018817326,0.00023231645,0.00048702158,0.000007181474,0.00035492738,0.000015030538],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019385323,0.0000517527,0.000067258414,0.0000016185718,0.0000116973415,1.9791344e-7,0.046456903,6.5828644e-8,0.000005746345,0.93113726,0.016429752,0.005818357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013636998,0.000067231675,0.0018017004,0.0000036218894,0.000014140326,0.0000013676818,0.021441182,0.0000018222803,0.00000323264,0.0104485955,0.966045,0.000035686233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005426227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018035324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054281958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021167006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8202868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013193154","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1375","title":"Just Clinics: A Humble Manifesto","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Legal service; Accountability; Legal profession; Manifesto; Inequality; Sociology; Intersection (aeronautics); Public relations; Construct (python library); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.15698979658348106,"score_gpt":0.4787690945841877,"score_spread":0.32177929800070665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013193154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05677922,0.000051887742,0.000030318954,0.62906015,0.00031148444,0.00004702926,0.0000031568554,0.0000123438895,0.3137044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95389956,0.00009599624,0.000167088,0.03752125,0.0076656947,4.2431884e-7,3.8861302e-7,0.000004208292,0.00064538716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928164,0.00011810098,0.00024750613,0.000045630757,0.0001934064,0.000113681665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993081,0.000082413484,0.00025349014,0.00002106165,0.00020975266,0.00012518522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049891055,0.000039883158,0.000110433044,0.000036671914,0.0006035178,0.00015785903,0.000101254016,0.00006441177,0.00011830475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048690132,0.000037817354,0.00005574679,0.00021214575,0.00015648785,0.00050320517,0.0000126380955,0.00028202706,0.000018779909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011380942,0.00002558616,0.00010161068,0.000004800433,0.000012948747,0.0000023048224,0.089080356,1.1982569e-7,0.000019921114,0.89743483,0.011577092,0.0017290408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018559709,0.000042939464,0.00053081155,0.0000027195529,0.000016031012,0.0000033028418,0.015170295,7.6947526e-7,0.000004355146,0.0068668677,0.9771302,0.000046127658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037321737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029505222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003925279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010188322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5641955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013296520","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1378","title":"Confronting Accessibility in Clinical Legal Education: Human Rights Law and the Accommodation of Law Students with Disabilities in External Placements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Reasonable accommodation; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Duty; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.09602452262224599,"score_gpt":0.49957155230346584,"score_spread":0.40354702968121986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013296520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91070825,0.000025088866,0.000005215852,0.034867983,0.000103185484,0.00015342576,0.0000022034715,0.000002308403,0.054132342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951984,0.0000071573704,0.00009247777,0.0036356358,0.0009770541,0.0000033982287,0.0000010741117,0.0000028856925,0.00008188535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982345,0.00061249145,0.00063592644,0.000090233705,0.00032033472,0.00010651253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989163,0.00031320515,0.00048741992,0.00004610851,0.00017569872,0.00006124063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019666522,0.000061915,0.00022492271,0.00003468299,0.00054324867,0.0002646445,0.00018009255,0.000058933107,0.000023426039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023752303,0.000043337175,0.00003624924,0.00013346256,0.001101415,0.0011050103,0.000037745525,0.00036551204,2.569775e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014080743,0.00019744523,0.044578224,0.000011743914,0.000012803594,2.6630042e-7,0.06139187,2.826993e-7,0.0000031563352,0.89343697,0.000040065253,0.00018634202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0097023025,0.00037454456,0.5219395,0.00021475421,0.00010377456,0.000006585333,0.11505907,0.00001029535,0.000030620726,0.235695,0.11653325,0.0003302915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08213706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04736827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65774196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000688351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048002048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97001475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013577763","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1377","title":"Home, Precarious Home: A Year of Housing Law Advocacy at a Saskatoon Legal Clinic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Legal service; Representation (politics); Political science; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05871959572544358,"score_gpt":0.39984632916115737,"score_spread":0.34112673343571376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013577763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67094046,0.0001341277,0.00000971174,0.15527403,0.00039865475,0.000102681995,0.0000113679225,0.0000171832,0.17311177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875439,0.00007726588,0.00015948467,0.00864497,0.0028998014,6.3613766e-7,0.0000010679694,0.0000094772,0.0006633889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998785,0.0002003549,0.00043081093,0.00008059394,0.00032992044,0.00017332523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988689,0.00013246111,0.0005402906,0.00004396538,0.00026978078,0.00014461455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005560032,0.00007217132,0.00023852871,0.0000622437,0.0006061431,0.00015322145,0.00013640962,0.00010637974,0.00013386794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023885223,0.00006946718,0.00011613542,0.0003577542,0.00042159727,0.00068686577,0.00003599262,0.00034342043,0.0000128705315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013421477,0.00011424799,0.0005180524,0.00002981781,0.00006416435,0.000005094233,0.18806176,6.0944376e-7,0.00025241246,0.799303,0.010159316,0.0013573439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007448584,0.000180439,0.0014587124,0.000017768254,0.000054558466,0.0000054497464,0.0107623525,9.96282e-7,0.000053207128,0.0043397336,0.9822626,0.00011931029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014828339,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033179058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9721033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010461016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015905879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.991732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013616847","doi":"","title":"ACCLE and Bill C-75: Implications for Student Legal Clinics & Communities in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13615245027830042,"score_gpt":0.4707371071459603,"score_spread":0.33458465686765987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013616847","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3489902,0.00006869046,0.000016466634,0.6393242,0.00012556963,0.000106278596,0.000029047895,0.000003095061,0.011336452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978787,0.0001856429,0.000094852956,0.019954184,0.00090108375,0.0000029494752,0.00000155635,0.0000032203495,0.00006950686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994009,0.00010551733,0.00025522624,0.000032931748,0.00009994045,0.00010549718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992464,0.00028032644,0.00018025372,0.000025555875,0.00018292153,0.00008455028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040113303,0.000037169357,0.000111882844,0.000033371438,0.00054533494,0.00012813963,0.00010270493,0.000031398777,0.000010753857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021041253,0.00003228583,0.000022429283,0.00014851532,0.00011459665,0.00034604137,0.000018050707,0.00020292039,1.8772253e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012803514,0.00003150676,0.0068859,0.000006289035,0.00001543647,2.8317797e-7,0.08054718,0.0000010441128,0.0000054480165,0.90383273,0.005516846,0.003144553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002974888,0.000033421962,0.031512365,0.0000033290348,0.000011272093,0.0000013646105,0.06997507,0.0000028897582,8.662485e-7,0.005387305,0.89272594,0.000048699876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9300865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91690636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8984454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014395823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032361168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57407326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024097784","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1365","title":"Measuring Correctional Admissions of Aboriginal Offenders in Canada: A Relative Inter-jurisdictional Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Criminology; Sanctions; Criminal justice; Population; Political science; Prison; Crime statistics; Representation (politics); Psychology; Law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.02914283313885587,"score_gpt":0.32655246513061015,"score_spread":0.2974096319917543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024097784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877109,0.000057203582,0.00025422216,0.0014162903,0.00035427848,0.000039923103,0.00001111839,0.000002494552,0.010153555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990081,0.000091365,0.00003878162,0.00016719764,0.0004501371,7.55132e-7,0.0000011283396,0.0000034918992,0.00023904354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871635,0.00016103734,0.0003925189,0.00009042915,0.0004725199,0.00016716466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906445,0.00014397057,0.00032959683,0.00003873668,0.0002938827,0.0001293638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043702032,0.00007377038,0.00032798297,0.00046757978,0.00027457616,0.00002109098,0.000098496035,0.00005798996,0.00019723312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074216325,0.00006982903,0.0002179512,0.0009035637,0.00010512081,0.00023117605,0.000012094366,0.00024665007,7.5658716e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000552291,0.00042516697,0.2228962,0.00007666208,0.0036808143,0.000040995936,0.24654019,0.0022061162,0.00023950763,0.50826603,0.0009843077,0.01409174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001457976,0.00023543682,0.13269192,0.00014832929,0.0029869073,0.000029940758,0.8223163,0.0007697544,0.00005578142,0.003870382,0.03498832,0.00044898255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95782524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96949285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5757761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007923952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046840273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83092636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089536886","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1395","title":"Thinking Broadly: This Volume as a Guide for Abolitionists","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.025441830442847424,"score_gpt":0.3447058058358958,"score_spread":0.31926397539304835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089536886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04739095,0.001003261,0.0006834932,0.277605,0.00067610655,0.00033220786,0.00004648026,0.00007795923,0.6721845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91512144,0.0004608992,0.0015690692,0.057283822,0.018578412,0.0000040163563,0.0000017874494,0.000023654573,0.006956901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988485,0.00011399549,0.00029564713,0.00009932621,0.00038614107,0.00025640236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991459,0.000060159113,0.00033500046,0.000032899563,0.00020913445,0.00021690353],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006132736,0.00008359583,0.00026172487,0.000024855011,0.0018397154,0.00014909083,0.00020956817,0.000102458085,0.000068776746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025514606,0.00008191775,0.00026317305,0.0001291754,0.0006788429,0.0002454809,0.000020817706,0.00017074993,0.000009117411],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002873805,0.000022572956,0.00007198465,0.000017845203,0.000042079228,0.000003837925,0.22827345,3.4587723e-7,0.000110963556,0.6362602,0.13215922,0.0030087198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003556924,0.00010256324,0.00018117049,0.000008430684,0.000028106831,0.0000031397724,0.012454767,0.0000032902801,0.000005744165,0.01672189,0.9700407,0.000094507755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067043877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015025414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8677305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017548546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007708101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090007280","doi":"","title":"The Jail Accountability & Information Line: Early Reflections on Praxis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Accountability; Line (geometry); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05839991195907557,"score_gpt":0.3994869199266573,"score_spread":0.34108700796758173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090007280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85714006,0.000045505123,0.0002922703,0.07541405,0.0002987815,0.000089837944,0.000006830782,0.000020497262,0.066692196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99353147,0.00021977925,0.0000138248115,0.0037999596,0.002386384,0.0000010940312,2.939048e-7,0.0000019104998,0.00004531531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992378,0.00010927968,0.00023573505,0.000037321683,0.00026340692,0.00011650645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933124,0.000106903586,0.00018999074,0.000033274566,0.00025778185,0.000080829785],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004364659,0.000045797642,0.00009902494,0.000041410156,0.001806727,0.00024378288,0.00010182196,0.0000534149,0.000011066461],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003052496,0.000032607775,0.000110275396,0.000284558,0.00019416423,0.00046041803,0.000013374637,0.0001986256,0.000009681932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018494116,0.00005083509,0.0001028704,0.000012601252,0.000078912155,8.5309057e-7,0.3544228,0.0000149843445,0.000035710604,0.53408134,0.0014915364,0.109522596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022956406,0.00034648713,0.0013393614,0.0000068847307,0.0001577141,0.0000023449124,0.28865469,0.000016193748,0.000016462993,0.004108706,0.7050294,0.00009215316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021916758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007989838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70353794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008454397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022004462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090131877","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1399","title":"Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Bill C-83, Solitary Confinement, and Mental Health","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Prison; Mental health; Public administration; Order (exchange); Corporate governance; Political science; Sight; Law; Psychology; Psychiatry; Business","score_opus":0.08871129233230568,"score_gpt":0.4334946295415878,"score_spread":0.3447833372092821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090131877","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86801326,0.00094102276,0.0000321969,0.12098444,0.0006448183,0.00016343479,0.00019220538,0.000004538756,0.009024071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339664,0.00018248575,0.00009474894,0.004891497,0.0013166432,3.5578162e-7,0.0000024263898,0.000009726481,0.00010549723],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99859357,0.0001847082,0.0006829,0.00011001607,0.00021730068,0.00021153309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990128,0.00007741297,0.0005371373,0.00005745057,0.000086949876,0.0002282169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038403668,0.00009860523,0.00047025745,0.00008161378,0.0001138721,0.000008304095,0.00009123407,0.00010956457,0.000072993396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004168125,0.00007024457,0.000107077074,0.00004714346,0.00022288089,0.000036728918,0.00003148213,0.00021654274,0.00000289676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015607974,0.0008856709,0.0014673448,0.0006888559,0.0010404048,0.0003001697,0.64090014,7.8353855e-7,0.0040539033,0.06228767,0.041332185,0.2454821],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013992232,0.009590412,0.04209777,0.0006551102,0.00015083487,0.00051122706,0.06537407,0.000021447844,0.0004935544,0.01689073,0.8494619,0.0007607154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019939218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001600771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8081297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026701637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024415881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30142266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090789814","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1397","title":"Detaining the Uncooperative Migrant","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration detention; Political science; Immigration law; Deportation; Law; Statutory law; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Prison; Naturalisation; Refugee; Criminology; Sociology; Citizenship","score_opus":0.041794123264383254,"score_gpt":0.3429789858022383,"score_spread":0.30118486253785504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090789814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7114152,0.00040364164,0.00051728956,0.22623694,0.00021280255,0.00015586289,0.00000622772,0.00001778373,0.06103425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863156,0.00012700156,0.000039506194,0.008902458,0.0044193384,5.918169e-7,4.3164812e-7,0.0000032849728,0.00019178362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992292,0.0002068604,0.00019348005,0.00004455519,0.00021717255,0.00010872252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952585,0.00004929329,0.00014895739,0.000017958853,0.00018370355,0.00007422134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042530993,0.000050065977,0.00011837422,0.000019065437,0.00093358156,0.00011583188,0.00010063858,0.00004962748,0.000025483192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020393507,0.00003046384,0.000071904564,0.00012326751,0.00023507659,0.00023175243,0.0000084460935,0.00016419198,0.0000026809726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012933053,0.000005907343,0.000045463083,0.0000016841275,0.000014703163,8.6720337e-7,0.40768737,0.0000013764604,0.00011921312,0.5876053,0.0023965389,0.0021086629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003135014,0.00016428744,0.00069763314,0.000010106511,0.000027839316,0.0000030794467,0.049288608,0.00003836901,0.00014323542,0.008455141,0.9407717,0.00008648162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003825745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006333933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9383752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036058773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032439866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71804494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090940754","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1398","title":"No One Is Disposable: Towards Feminist Models of Transformative Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transformative learning; Grassroots; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Economic Justice; Harm; Prison; Criminology; Friendship; Feminism; Political science; Public relations; Gender studies; Law; Social science; Politics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.13235689146542756,"score_gpt":0.3843415584535591,"score_spread":0.25198466698813154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090940754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05214213,0.00047332604,0.00050107436,0.08306029,0.00031092516,0.00018537432,0.0001964393,0.00001953578,0.8631109],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856967,0.0008412824,0.0001505482,0.010312602,0.002556764,7.1779573e-7,6.1620767e-7,0.000006908364,0.00043389763],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986419,0.00013147273,0.000436951,0.00008143333,0.00048022153,0.00022802618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991719,0.000072161085,0.0002773994,0.000032208864,0.00028181245,0.00016448172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047616806,0.00010005608,0.00041081166,0.0000344342,0.0006515731,0.00004854095,0.00017419811,0.0001026303,0.000021688225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011218178,0.00008952706,0.00013261953,0.00016501795,0.0006322132,0.00028143637,0.00002826526,0.00018201588,0.0000021402745],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007695813,0.00005144365,0.00000881601,0.00011079711,0.00009738688,0.0000015156962,0.6560275,0.0000012237286,0.0000413841,0.33992183,0.0024571684,0.001203988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001901183,0.000888213,0.00031676952,0.00006811224,0.0004985119,0.000004144729,0.67616874,0.00010580753,0.00031657892,0.039921347,0.2793958,0.0004148157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003069867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015680569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93355453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051615953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046871384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50114393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121406069","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1401","title":"Litigation is “Just One Tool”: An Annotated Interview with Karin Baqi, Counsel for the End Immigration Detention Network in Brown v Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College","funders":"Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences","keywords":"Immigration detention; Immigration; Victory; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Politics; Human rights; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.05775602021028973,"score_gpt":0.33315976926014346,"score_spread":0.2754037490498537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121406069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9389137,0.00049117557,0.001781967,0.05785738,0.0001847373,0.00034516485,0.00004131992,0.0000062676536,0.00037827398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816418,0.00008493758,0.00007470872,0.016387353,0.0017272154,0.000009387374,0.000021216487,0.000008544383,0.000044792887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990315,0.00016880376,0.00038424585,0.00008980046,0.00014584219,0.00017984418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999371,0.00006890326,0.00027654888,0.000044475037,0.0001560585,0.00008300127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044337334,0.00007783817,0.00017220907,0.000025598472,0.0002268086,0.000043247088,0.000064783,0.000065678505,0.00003824128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013224913,0.00005792685,0.000037117694,0.00015285278,0.000045773246,0.00015308376,0.000003452348,0.00016249486,4.8796886e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033758935,0.00039228707,0.0073648253,0.0005279945,0.0005740353,0.000025997497,0.35428435,0.00014946777,0.00022593967,0.39654216,0.06685561,0.16968143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0103161065,0.0035660223,0.72736615,0.00028277305,0.00040318575,0.00010171049,0.02652609,0.0024160298,0.00010626278,0.01299068,0.21526423,0.00066075503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2625473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74341136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72000134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000071554576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000382708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74236345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122538769","doi":"","title":"Don't Get Enough Credit: The Need for an Impartial Consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Appeal; Creditor; Business; Credit history; Debt; Tribunal; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05373279725040031,"score_gpt":0.3740905111768526,"score_spread":0.3203577139264523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122538769","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8709613,0.000057660633,0.00011768739,0.09112751,0.00031487682,0.00041461634,0.000028209646,0.000015283167,0.036962867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9913843,0.000017559501,0.00010932088,0.0018741937,0.0060490463,0.000005329323,0.00000462384,0.0000050414665,0.000550536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987558,0.0000986697,0.00044713766,0.00010280415,0.00029162873,0.00030391963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992333,0.00007001195,0.00032427118,0.00007727425,0.0001533504,0.00014181613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012028044,0.00008737631,0.00022986355,0.000047410012,0.0009244745,0.00016332735,0.00021312843,0.000115826064,0.000019828773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084164836,0.00006448788,0.0001336233,0.00011209699,0.00028027216,0.00030732495,0.000016563768,0.0003020901,7.39839e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015808975,0.00019303478,0.000985838,0.0000026304322,0.000029689007,0.000017136625,0.046209205,0.00000508445,0.00015352559,0.94335973,0.0063597453,0.0025263038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009680556,0.00020789604,0.023254223,0.0000064270416,0.00003842146,0.000040451854,0.0027063445,0.0000073525375,0.00002054555,0.03957583,0.93305653,0.00011790778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2158239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2825515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9266968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020177933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011794419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.789398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124602407","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1258","title":"Troubling Trends in Canada’s Immigration System Via the Excluded Family Member Regulation: A Survey of Jurisprudence and Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family reunification; Harm; Misrepresentation; Immigration; Refugee; Law; Family member; Political science; Immigration detention; Immigration law; Family law; Jurisprudence; Criminology; Sociology; History; Genealogy","score_opus":0.06424663170657442,"score_gpt":0.37373036712955027,"score_spread":0.30948373542297586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124602407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99050707,0.00021537355,0.000040988893,0.0044524344,0.00021435272,0.000053460575,0.000014692248,0.0000015627937,0.0045000943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991509,0.000019163042,0.000009781549,0.00031004287,0.00039670797,0.0000013850695,0.0000022723973,0.0000049862433,0.00010481259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989516,0.00023202747,0.00042774412,0.000073708274,0.00017470832,0.0001401771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903333,0.00007242435,0.0005950207,0.00010635591,0.00013138341,0.00006147475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008292953,0.00006915434,0.00022573574,0.00008011156,0.00037589474,0.000042281852,0.00010733491,0.00006720072,0.000007058335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021274906,0.000051047624,0.000030564912,0.0000704188,0.00009072539,0.00014254056,0.000010745557,0.00013148267,1.7837458e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012577508,0.00012153585,0.21788456,0.00024683078,0.00026391677,0.00003499878,0.11095168,0.000017429906,0.000379813,0.599637,0.0091651,0.060039412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007041583,0.00003759694,0.99656415,0.000020675061,0.000012586867,0.000016924649,0.0017190798,0.000059103768,0.0000067271776,0.00030442336,0.00050939724,0.00004515637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.968022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9786827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7786796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011428625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004562868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28911164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125041644","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1269","title":"Making a Music City: The Commodification of Culture in Toronto’s Urban Redevelopment, Tensions between Use-Value and Exchange-Value, and the Counterproductive Treatment of Alternative Cultures within Municipal Legal Frameworks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Redevelopment; Value (mathematics); Urban regeneration; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Social science; Environmental planning; Economy; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0961673441073551,"score_gpt":0.38595875962873366,"score_spread":0.28979141552137855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125041644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96953547,0.0016389211,0.000006046023,0.025057124,0.00008276967,0.00038463113,0.0000211176,0.000003856275,0.0032700596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99681664,0.0012265275,0.00013913396,0.000610495,0.0007438862,0.0000031410066,0.0000018344573,0.0000035622295,0.00045479427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875474,0.00028698586,0.00040024534,0.00011098445,0.00028831925,0.00015872945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990357,0.00014183357,0.0005228668,0.00006263792,0.00019007387,0.00004689227],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006148194,0.00012474958,0.0003615322,0.00003199468,0.00060408114,0.00010546287,0.00012815221,0.00016583105,0.0000045720253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014383081,0.000064362524,0.000060323557,0.00012743911,0.0008264036,0.0002888186,0.000035642464,0.00026056077,1.4985094e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016831828,0.000065225264,0.0018462066,0.0000050491853,0.00014362161,0.0000019121762,0.69617933,0.0000039698575,0.000038726146,0.29643947,0.0013123021,0.0037958615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0062567573,0.0010520214,0.3432659,0.00074837287,0.0005252523,0.000044066277,0.4507089,0.000069511756,0.00032986974,0.03931072,0.15705281,0.000635826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057035886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012176515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3414197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029926273,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014359057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94924337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125733836","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1300","title":"Issue 1: Federal Legislation on Indigenous Child Welfare in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Welfare; Political science; Public administration; Tribunal; Law; Commission; Exclusive jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.01256653014907309,"score_gpt":0.30808344947787347,"score_spread":0.29551691932880036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125733836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67338777,0.000038184877,6.123799e-7,0.012338687,0.0006436133,0.000103782724,0.000003876685,0.0000030861959,0.31348038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9874493,0.00032676134,0.000010662367,0.00117586,0.0103418855,1.8366352e-7,0.0000011431771,0.000005922601,0.0006883179],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998883,0.00016590577,0.0002613641,0.00006836977,0.00030881376,0.0003125144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994679,0.000022378701,0.00020713429,0.00003455129,0.00015464102,0.00011338909],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041654365,0.00006829757,0.00015741312,0.0001004177,0.007470466,0.00005587303,0.00010245645,0.00008805198,0.000043093947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000051493344,0.000056668097,0.000031362473,0.00013643914,0.00016502803,0.00016103231,8.099828e-7,0.00018725995,0.0000036679266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019458605,0.000038231083,0.0005575784,0.0000060411694,0.000007554678,0.0000039398096,0.54024374,4.6244693e-7,1.8115132e-7,0.45787573,0.00017562594,0.0010714447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024124456,0.00010947889,0.015352706,0.000016745407,0.0000036175852,0.0000054235193,0.010623959,3.2170897e-7,0.000010356741,0.0018371212,0.97171885,0.00008016952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9982311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97154325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093670835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017638953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9938217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125927919","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1319","title":"Keeping Chance in Its Place: The Socio-Legal Regulation of Gambling","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Renting; Payment; Sociology; Sitting; Law; Media studies; Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.11707365193522641,"score_gpt":0.437954903840111,"score_spread":0.3208812519048846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125927919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99040365,0.000109550616,0.000010014756,0.0019537606,0.00024809333,0.00005184135,0.0000028716743,0.000003012761,0.007217192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978994,0.000011033869,0.000022480504,0.00034824212,0.0014436737,0.0000011539172,4.2504905e-7,0.0000072081752,0.00026639926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99930817,0.000089567286,0.00026767672,0.000060823066,0.00013125378,0.0001425054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951816,0.000037913855,0.00026577612,0.000049992264,0.00010355225,0.000024632789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034316705,0.00006177009,0.00016378336,0.00008709243,0.00015896803,0.00001818586,0.00007332197,0.0000828256,0.000025303181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017023336,0.000045670065,0.00006365966,0.000107441425,0.0001412182,0.00009772588,0.000014091528,0.00013688816,0.000003876864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007288282,0.0005782713,0.020667605,0.000045145105,0.00027858536,0.00003903936,0.14214201,0.000005623224,0.009012407,0.8072315,0.00074424734,0.018526725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046641757,0.0006360169,0.97568923,0.0001264501,0.00012906661,0.0001178853,0.0030710588,0.000021563586,0.0018946192,0.007727126,0.0057266857,0.00019609631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071324897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008940304,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9550217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043918022,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048781698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18623711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133168691","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1409","title":"A Pipeline Story: The Evolving Autonomy of Canadian Municipalities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislature; Statutory law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Autonomy; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.04232552655796398,"score_gpt":0.33370421449100807,"score_spread":0.2913786879330441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133168691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09529504,0.0033923069,0.000006024336,0.0999894,0.00047381182,0.00007876069,0.000030372757,0.000008955781,0.80072534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99050003,0.0000814075,0.000111928035,0.0016904221,0.0025169495,4.8320305e-7,3.2941176e-7,0.0000055797823,0.0050928406],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988779,0.0003536097,0.00022663639,0.000048969338,0.00026140438,0.00023150734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910873,0.0001350945,0.00019466739,0.00006756548,0.00034888976,0.00014504253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009268043,0.000056461566,0.00019619311,0.0001211494,0.00085327995,0.00008249062,0.00020927706,0.0000764282,0.00007342903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043290106,0.000044039072,0.00010000868,0.0003121023,0.00062458473,0.00016740721,0.00003402395,0.00023518226,0.0000013027548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021875112,0.0000069272824,0.00008840779,0.000004961562,0.000019751158,0.000008821717,0.42924076,6.4784484e-7,0.000008143664,0.5676472,0.0025407453,0.0004314263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013117901,0.00001260543,0.000324513,0.000013900625,0.000023817163,0.0000030337994,0.05557706,0.000002757054,0.0000205493,0.005710937,0.9381293,0.00005031344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62018824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43797153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9355886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002347612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035000509,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6562826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133595346","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1408","title":"The Missing Constitutionalism of Canada v Vavilov","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Appeal; Citizenship; Political science; Constitution; Administrative law; Law; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Legalism (Western philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.028926299598757338,"score_gpt":0.3183451814879905,"score_spread":0.28941888188923315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133595346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06512675,0.004336968,0.00003989156,0.24267036,0.00088762725,0.00004872683,0.000025691512,0.000004141426,0.68685985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960663,0.00033915797,0.00002348728,0.0017704208,0.001587084,1.8505747e-7,1.8933372e-7,0.000001079805,0.00021212918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992171,0.000088599714,0.00019731472,0.000033254917,0.0003334644,0.00013025764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992585,0.00014106027,0.00014988292,0.000018336363,0.00037790934,0.000054272656],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033066244,0.000037227615,0.00012607846,0.000010637566,0.002041936,0.000035829205,0.00006982716,0.000029705474,0.000008645238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025650885,0.000026909049,0.000056441397,0.00009240661,0.0012113425,0.00006104103,0.000021782082,0.00007973361,1.2827552e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055987794,0.000007819024,0.0000901319,0.0000018173831,0.000036014888,0.000010541495,0.0020002192,4.774563e-7,0.000046119898,0.994795,0.001777837,0.001228426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016183394,0.0000075031166,0.0019295498,0.000018973446,0.000020596957,0.000015867141,0.0053025447,1.9050478e-7,0.00007974932,0.2140242,0.77839035,0.000048641235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58737564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5989234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9309395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010179903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061099683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142767516","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1407","title":"Deference to Legislatures: The Case of the 2018 Ontario Better Local Government Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Legislature; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Judicial deference; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02903838877367183,"score_gpt":0.305100085928771,"score_spread":0.2760616971550992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142767516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7828654,0.0002454954,0.00004686351,0.09072221,0.00037740037,0.00007225625,0.000015911473,0.0000018772251,0.12565255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919625,0.000033554432,0.00001668993,0.006299061,0.0012836804,6.569535e-7,4.2140943e-8,0.0000014961113,0.00040233368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920696,0.00011099169,0.00016362117,0.000050292238,0.0003369041,0.0001312373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996026,0.000069723224,0.000119673154,0.000041939133,0.00011788788,0.000048184796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002654365,0.000051829757,0.00013049417,0.0000064555866,0.0010829597,0.000041211035,0.00012720453,0.000045008186,0.000024277017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007417984,0.000028549497,0.0001109227,0.000100531324,0.0007296069,0.00006372677,0.000083412844,0.00016752654,9.872319e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018444864,0.00003063744,0.0010266674,0.0000019455915,0.00006586246,0.000063688785,0.046229187,0.000001553867,0.000035812624,0.9449574,0.0032705958,0.0042982427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034888144,0.00007518275,0.035188295,0.00005185214,0.00010369283,0.00019488219,0.028123403,2.3738161e-7,0.00017492115,0.08681377,0.8487912,0.0001336949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26283726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6356301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85814357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021972826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008289834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.832936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150226060","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1405","title":"The Better Local Government Act versus Municipal Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Local government; Democracy; Public administration; Political science; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.029564945102533626,"score_gpt":0.35098515828569643,"score_spread":0.32142021318316283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150226060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31043962,0.0016920982,0.00005399849,0.17204903,0.0018447025,0.0000947366,0.000013854975,0.000017760616,0.5137942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916183,0.0002297422,0.00008257002,0.0022055665,0.0046717613,5.2858826e-7,1.7078396e-7,0.0000072694943,0.0011840914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983953,0.0002917396,0.00024541636,0.000070775255,0.0007010343,0.00029572783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919033,0.00030299052,0.00018421198,0.00007642797,0.000120610974,0.00012540404],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006171646,0.00007427415,0.000161899,0.000010179007,0.0015404301,0.00020329282,0.00023992968,0.00009343757,0.000036709534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027910902,0.00005398076,0.00013321092,0.00011886912,0.00074109767,0.00019023032,0.00009136632,0.00028486075,0.0000073245383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014778573,0.00004886984,0.00017343402,0.0000042086335,0.00012081633,0.00007131025,0.17063099,0.0000011566625,0.000028725446,0.79999727,0.0028447655,0.025930682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006086026,0.00005238534,0.0003868482,0.0000072640078,0.00003576911,0.0000038149756,0.016888212,0.000002519146,0.000052146155,0.0099418415,0.971944,0.000076639706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019515199,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018522762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96909916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003023226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000365052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151230307","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1410","title":"With Great(er) Power Comes Great(er) Responsibility: Indigenous Rights and Municipal Autonomy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Indigenous rights; Autonomy; Political science; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Democracy; Public administration; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Local government; Empowerment; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.02316959477108585,"score_gpt":0.3310868733339203,"score_spread":0.30791727856283446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151230307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8994759,0.0009375614,0.0000070915216,0.004786564,0.00015909168,0.00012663032,0.000018162236,0.000023429422,0.09446558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99437433,0.000039548257,0.00045349932,0.0011171204,0.0012979655,0.0000015896734,0.0000010145436,0.000014318843,0.00270059],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979282,0.000527924,0.00038644182,0.0001988348,0.0005167627,0.0004418062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873734,0.00019862555,0.0002898589,0.00014502289,0.00033128224,0.00029790075],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008195391,0.00016985211,0.0004749207,0.00011130344,0.0013737442,0.00027519438,0.00021577936,0.00020150801,0.00008597269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014033467,0.00013282937,0.00011236058,0.00030916807,0.0010456778,0.0004043577,0.000094299256,0.00038665102,0.0000041614076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019337326,0.00008399283,0.0029473528,0.000014650611,0.0001557669,0.00033802135,0.7792448,5.1334035e-7,0.0000150913565,0.2158967,0.00019434716,0.0009153903],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018471079,0.0004933596,0.009380204,0.00006206529,0.00016426902,0.00014627687,0.017784957,0.0000013154046,0.00008567219,0.047493793,0.9221167,0.00042426446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0140979085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004913801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9219224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026781636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015159046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151993704","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1412","title":"Toward City Charters in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.03735381644556585,"score_gpt":0.313402935141677,"score_spread":0.27604911869611115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151993704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87058884,0.00016118921,0.0000041774583,0.047130898,0.0002798544,0.000023516575,0.0000130465105,0.000001652495,0.08179684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99417144,0.00006662379,0.0000069306207,0.003811927,0.0015667111,2.308222e-7,9.825781e-8,0.000002005924,0.00037400657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919015,0.00010086335,0.00019014996,0.0000443502,0.00026170537,0.00021280452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996528,0.0000372662,0.0000998343,0.00002005393,0.00007110735,0.00011891037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023791645,0.000038150276,0.00016217993,0.000013317635,0.0001614961,0.000033176286,0.00006592079,0.00003869908,0.000021974143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101163314,0.00003512239,0.00004186314,0.000087994114,0.00009516074,0.000098709905,0.0000129378905,0.00011278072,3.9866427e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003190227,0.000010269607,0.002494187,0.000007231337,0.0000075055427,0.00007193787,0.007841256,1.074934e-7,0.000017288225,0.9875359,0.0010616883,0.000949435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005408179,0.000017196222,0.102500275,0.000042205535,0.000007589113,0.000020326883,0.0065578963,0.0000012163412,0.000057266807,0.021620877,0.86850566,0.00012868535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99473673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9869552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.965915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033638107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5967256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152291097","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1411","title":"Bill 5: How the Better Local Government Act Silenced the Voices of Diverse Progressive Women Candidates in Toronto’s 2018 Municipal Election","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Local government; Local election; Public administration; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02259878049350867,"score_gpt":0.3315563076463742,"score_spread":0.30895752715286556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152291097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658902,0.00019753966,0.0000031897107,0.02729184,0.00014296241,0.00007696904,0.000007972955,0.0000014191246,0.0063878903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99786687,0.0002367599,0.000005358894,0.0006446561,0.0009303588,0.0000029028179,3.665757e-7,0.0000027373349,0.00030998889],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894196,0.00026912638,0.0001529255,0.000055389904,0.00038910986,0.00019146713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995206,0.000073536445,0.00022737877,0.00004434952,0.00009061519,0.000043522447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004258276,0.0000513537,0.00011835936,0.000010737853,0.0004082201,0.00007794319,0.00011543031,0.000052712523,0.00002602696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004821752,0.000026404967,0.00005736034,0.00007681686,0.00041453374,0.0001811317,0.000039660692,0.00010910471,1.8206806e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010802382,0.00019405183,0.0061052185,0.000027289438,0.00021583951,0.000021501584,0.87427455,0.000009896515,0.0009907661,0.10112524,0.0018442235,0.015083413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009362677,0.00020110226,0.04659546,0.000032147782,0.000056021305,0.000010938911,0.90760165,0.00003767188,0.0017456783,0.013041078,0.029608103,0.0001338981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08690198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049988817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08808416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004463339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023305665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96734643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152976178","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1253","title":"Beyond Reconciliation: Decolonizing Clinical Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Decolonization; Colonialism; Legal education; Political science; Indigenous; Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Hegemony; Politics","score_opus":0.12303640261836599,"score_gpt":0.5184570339269928,"score_spread":0.3954206313086268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152976178","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.162401,0.00005004197,0.0000124125845,0.3418004,0.0022296195,0.000058199315,0.0000017508148,0.000006138322,0.49344042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755048,0.00014891858,0.00046392248,0.008676815,0.012194999,0.0000012360871,7.691352e-7,0.0000041786598,0.0030043582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990375,0.00019398704,0.00038456862,0.000062381056,0.00020128842,0.000120242985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829245,0.00013614913,0.00084738596,0.0000787702,0.00054407533,0.000101197606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018592565,0.000046745186,0.00013436402,0.00006258279,0.0026920747,0.0007249761,0.000192422,0.00010924465,0.000062451865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021100014,0.000045697452,0.0000757254,0.00006523792,0.0003843118,0.0017169189,0.000018936416,0.0003330392,0.000008339992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009443201,0.000069767055,0.0017657147,0.0000024623648,0.000015070481,5.870601e-7,0.0103579005,2.246942e-8,0.000003992775,0.94398934,0.010960878,0.03282484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020329648,0.00002967506,0.02496784,0.0000066439065,0.000019057861,0.000005838111,0.0035576473,4.1322545e-7,0.000003151298,0.031120477,0.94003075,0.000055209057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01195741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032966752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9290699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010719067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004510112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154836732","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1396","title":"Intergenerational Imprisonment: Resistance and Resilience in Indigenous Communities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Imprisonment; Criminalization; Temporalities; Criminology; Colonialism; Residential school; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Socioeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.02379190157330029,"score_gpt":0.32678869114644193,"score_spread":0.30299678957314163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154836732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96273327,0.000532816,0.000014403428,0.012975068,0.000096308926,0.00009032786,0.000005185934,0.000004156903,0.023548443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912478,0.005242612,0.000103116385,0.0013813706,0.0016335514,3.1280226e-7,9.1521133e-7,0.000003949317,0.00038639354],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990871,0.0002377262,0.00026341068,0.000049970397,0.00017467541,0.00018710349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956095,0.000054968317,0.00016264038,0.0000253226,0.00008268533,0.00011343549],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004925599,0.0000552405,0.00014427066,0.000060120055,0.002856514,0.000065629756,0.000114285445,0.00006951136,0.000009923973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000063040366,0.000048368594,0.000024983878,0.00010611983,0.0003806951,0.00022006952,0.0000025519482,0.00018050025,6.842677e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001613675,0.000017785458,0.00040189916,0.000012902281,0.0000036772383,0.0000013007248,0.6084079,3.9402937e-7,0.0000039626716,0.3909644,0.00005814125,0.00011149479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006198203,0.00017109032,0.0083535025,0.0000438898,0.000012119184,0.0000065883623,0.09670479,0.0000034783316,0.000046569643,0.020778302,0.87307274,0.00018711403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08279838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62493366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87301457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011428621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031857265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99844164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155053350","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1406","title":"Games of Jurisdiction: How Local Governance Realities Challenge the “Creatures of the Province” Doctrine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Citizenship; Political science; Local government; Politics; Democracy; Law; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Public administration; Corporate governance; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.0191491250447018,"score_gpt":0.30860168624758355,"score_spread":0.28945256120288176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155053350","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14323397,0.003966129,0.000083519466,0.6046121,0.0002692156,0.00022861303,0.00011011425,0.000009923872,0.24748643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99363875,0.0021735898,0.000015314527,0.00040544182,0.0015166303,0.0000013095672,2.1137726e-7,0.0000030861313,0.002245661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999188,0.00013698667,0.00019345451,0.000050936982,0.00032209983,0.00010849278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922615,0.000073290495,0.0003800716,0.000081633196,0.00020693384,0.00003190211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025608667,0.000050392493,0.00015847916,0.0000089497335,0.00045923868,0.00003853617,0.00019236527,0.000060470233,0.000009620861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060505372,0.000028839944,0.00013241897,0.00012595353,0.0008188706,0.000108200176,0.000052294396,0.00016399071,1.01159394e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008422358,0.00003417777,0.00004195008,0.00001677542,0.000024794519,8.9566424e-7,0.010611403,0.0000016271396,0.000053795295,0.9845845,0.0010756827,0.0035459576],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002632074,0.000046818637,0.008995301,0.000039910574,0.000042788408,0.000008007793,0.011264705,0.000002008811,0.0009200053,0.029309303,0.9490495,0.00005849128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054479185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045013623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95527524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047748857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000630039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82356596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163384500","doi":"","title":"Beyond Reconciliation: Decolonizing Clinical Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Colonialism; Legal education; Political science; Law; Indigenous; Sociology; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.12303640261836599,"score_gpt":0.5184570339269928,"score_spread":0.3954206313086268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163384500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.162401,0.00005004197,0.0000124125845,0.3418004,0.0022296195,0.000058199315,0.0000017508148,0.000006138322,0.49344042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755048,0.00014891858,0.00046392248,0.008676815,0.012194999,0.0000012360871,7.691352e-7,0.0000041786598,0.0030043582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990375,0.00019398704,0.00038456862,0.000062381056,0.00020128842,0.000120242985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829245,0.00013614913,0.00084738596,0.0000787702,0.00054407533,0.000101197606],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018592565,0.000046745186,0.00013436402,0.00006258279,0.0026920747,0.0007249761,0.000192422,0.00010924465,0.000062451865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021100014,0.000045697452,0.0000757254,0.00006523792,0.0003843118,0.0017169189,0.000018936416,0.0003330392,0.000008339992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009443201,0.000069767055,0.0017657147,0.0000024623648,0.000015070481,5.870601e-7,0.0103579005,2.246942e-8,0.000003992775,0.94398934,0.010960878,0.03282484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020329648,0.00002967506,0.02496784,0.0000066439065,0.000019057861,0.000005838111,0.0035576473,4.1322545e-7,0.000003151298,0.031120477,0.94003075,0.000055209057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01195741,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032966752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9290699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010719067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004510112,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316766959","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1214","title":"Scotland: Delivering a Right to Housing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Investment (military); Public housing; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0921595675828305,"score_gpt":0.45364149231555034,"score_spread":0.36148192473271984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W316766959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97452646,0.000114193856,0.000097464464,0.0033781405,0.0003313048,0.00008064694,0.0000036949245,0.000012244178,0.021455862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99214137,0.000029627849,0.00015495036,0.0021404622,0.0054047634,0.0000015395574,3.1702103e-7,0.000012756055,0.00011422862],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896944,0.0001726083,0.000336846,0.000056767705,0.0002033241,0.00026100004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918073,0.00006323284,0.00019323936,0.000036660393,0.0002731583,0.00025295658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005486727,0.00007469316,0.00035460733,0.00008860495,0.0006376533,0.00002425157,0.000082276645,0.0001168261,0.000014658808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009221179,0.000059113896,0.000056086876,0.00010114241,0.00004676778,0.00014037505,0.000059136168,0.0002770811,0.000017482509],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019830461,0.00007499082,0.010168403,0.00013414727,0.00008775266,0.00006785591,0.6511712,0.0000058542437,0.0002599532,0.32820684,0.0016468951,0.0079777865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006446957,0.0007369766,0.021794481,0.0007611847,0.00014735886,0.00000888012,0.26922363,0.00001950201,0.00021198404,0.062615626,0.6372704,0.0007630429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009515882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037461396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63562346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014525064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036218978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99707985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183574380","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1422","title":"Substantive Equality and Jordan’s Principle: Challenges and Complexities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Operationalization; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Individualism; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13650249277374452,"score_gpt":0.39096221217906807,"score_spread":0.2544597194053235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183574380","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7822143,0.017467247,0.000005306072,0.040029258,0.00012205465,0.000044988534,0.000015790036,0.000007643875,0.16009346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98480713,0.012828419,0.00003878789,0.0008275039,0.0014001589,5.1415554e-7,2.590035e-7,0.000002240603,0.000094980765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992158,0.00016208102,0.00017623964,0.00007671164,0.00021878422,0.00015039579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947613,0.000097698474,0.00011537554,0.000018270017,0.00021357545,0.00007892882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042576712,0.00006469516,0.00022554916,0.000026140042,0.0009977141,0.00006159947,0.000038855138,0.000053245156,0.0000066761754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010517615,0.000056817003,0.00004068384,0.000050208128,0.0013778282,0.00015498322,0.00005914106,0.00010297262,2.9855292e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012543935,0.000017752645,0.00021003178,0.000011408491,0.000045536985,0.000009289003,0.04015418,1.0139646e-8,0.000016190372,0.95552236,0.000026300511,0.003974408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042246663,0.000050615272,0.06173927,0.000034741326,0.00003680869,0.00002694839,0.06148249,1.7542217e-7,0.000021743637,0.7096852,0.16637553,0.00012398299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004921439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011720845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24583712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037986458,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027398646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7673711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183800558","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1423","title":"An Abortion Law Preformed","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Political science; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.025033402933620847,"score_gpt":0.3658478447504241,"score_spread":0.34081444181680326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183800558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2019556,0.00011757413,0.00009473448,0.013515906,0.00025568655,0.000033526103,0.000019897841,0.000013037722,0.783994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98878795,0.00008538254,0.00016487027,0.0062888283,0.004133207,3.4554367e-7,0.0000021858834,0.000003537987,0.0005336758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916905,0.00015144768,0.00019369584,0.000052939125,0.0002530005,0.00017987723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993649,0.000033794746,0.00014080049,0.000035048964,0.00027389216,0.00015154498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027350336,0.000049985352,0.00013980235,0.000023778586,0.0007715161,0.0000803758,0.000074693235,0.00007183022,0.0000402821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036299025,0.00004529163,0.00007073025,0.00008944888,0.0008662481,0.0003372035,0.000009846276,0.00011355995,0.0000018175334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068872964,0.000035767906,0.00005707938,0.0000033372044,0.000014569234,0.000010972786,0.0039645983,5.4480165e-7,0.00012594613,0.99502295,0.00014134169,0.0006159839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023406686,0.000058625556,0.00086625665,0.000008490539,0.000024637748,0.000027504377,0.0043181633,5.573934e-7,0.000111295594,0.035465054,0.9588004,0.00008495556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010964765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032289953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9595579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000945208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002031387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185181445","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1421","title":"Who Owns the City? Pension Fund Capitalism and the Parkdale Rent Strike","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Capitalism; Finance; Business; Sovereign wealth fund; Institutional investor; Landlord; Pension fund; Economics; Market economy; Labour economics; Law; Political science; Corporate governance; Incentive","score_opus":0.046305065365086405,"score_gpt":0.26400810642778855,"score_spread":0.21770304106270214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185181445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9150474,0.005337136,0.00003859939,0.03194678,0.00031795094,0.000068512316,0.000033409044,0.0000037643758,0.047206473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98778296,0.004074988,0.000021518154,0.0047813193,0.0014872686,0.0000010051544,0.0000010442669,0.00001005101,0.0018398322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916404,0.000054617663,0.00042761606,0.00011478646,0.00005596485,0.00018297276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992889,0.00007112471,0.00041854975,0.00010482955,0.00006308598,0.00005350419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005826412,0.00009582946,0.0003703243,0.000047575177,0.0005078856,0.00016476048,0.000107315645,0.000080967926,0.000025755822],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025560694,0.00006279301,0.00014386368,0.00009928544,0.0003243317,0.00014725883,0.00006518102,0.00023404794,0.000003148325],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026340636,0.000021339445,0.00039648532,0.000008614462,0.000041360938,0.000011617284,0.00971456,7.9273417e-7,0.000008918329,0.9871775,0.0018001221,0.00079238706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023285944,0.00005906002,0.02750763,0.000025561325,0.00003186494,0.00014914855,0.000747512,0.000035163233,0.00005069138,0.101908386,0.86697966,0.00017672585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001450964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024632734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88526905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034993143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059959195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39062968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185596930","doi":"","title":"Negotiating Trauma & Teaching Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.057483983902578355,"score_gpt":0.3935547551056512,"score_spread":0.3360707712030728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185596930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40133095,0.0006233304,0.000057008623,0.04908689,0.00043198705,0.000038796636,0.0000033187307,0.00001652454,0.5484112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910565,0.00007418579,0.00025863748,0.0031754167,0.0048339153,2.518597e-7,2.7968764e-7,0.0000059013046,0.0005949236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885726,0.00027022112,0.00025240477,0.00007277114,0.00031584056,0.00023151717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994006,0.00012357788,0.00017311548,0.000036021236,0.00014878735,0.000117871474],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008425472,0.00006439015,0.00018984804,0.000026527696,0.0014872317,0.0002483267,0.00011101873,0.00007833977,0.000023480356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020654977,0.000060817016,0.00011086836,0.00006962309,0.0002808949,0.00040791446,0.000029517509,0.00028900572,0.0000022637685],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006326086,0.000023731222,0.00003264355,0.000009060006,0.000013018008,0.000029882443,0.040869553,0.00000115506,0.00015405248,0.95213604,0.00060133357,0.0061232126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033217182,0.00005847516,0.000543865,0.00005792044,0.00005232866,0.000062776075,0.03341086,0.000003703287,0.00010949372,0.04039275,0.9248272,0.00014845621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023838315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035669482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92422587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007347829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002632532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185936146","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1425","title":"Amadeusz: Inequities in the Enactment and Implementation of Records Suspensions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Disadvantage; Criminal record; Criminology; Indigenous; Limiting; Mentorship; Conviction; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.04184182185988293,"score_gpt":0.40401088268551305,"score_spread":0.3621690608256301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185936146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9855715,0.00013800025,0.0000075198054,0.010644649,0.000055064498,0.00002536938,0.0000022114787,8.4395526e-7,0.0035548487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755186,0.0011760904,0.00002525149,0.0006613049,0.00051241764,6.908718e-7,5.6650305e-7,0.0000013890269,0.00007042441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993466,0.00016517492,0.0002036905,0.000035072648,0.00016601238,0.00008345127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996132,0.00008970503,0.0001306103,0.000023261955,0.00012011824,0.00002307237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047133752,0.000031529085,0.00011888221,0.00006666726,0.00030393613,0.000047812235,0.000041613945,0.000026064301,0.00003160769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045261535,0.00002142693,0.00005198847,0.00017674908,0.00011981782,0.000107029504,0.000015117855,0.000073040545,1.12940754e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016205779,0.000080143334,0.0033555967,0.000019998652,0.000055007848,0.000016914471,0.44387326,9.665009e-7,0.00027523036,0.49417284,0.00045873676,0.05767509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020375295,0.00005638001,0.010484994,0.000010515309,0.000115450675,0.0000110885085,0.9727609,8.125862e-7,0.000080360944,0.004139601,0.012102442,0.000033687404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054967325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13685222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5288876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038965452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002387517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9513257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186114838","doi":"","title":"Pandemic Evictions: An Analysis of the 2020 Eviction Decisions of Saskatchewan's Office of Residential Tenancies (preprint)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Preprint; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0631801290180657,"score_gpt":0.44610724449018146,"score_spread":0.3829271154721158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186114838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99142945,0.00016358402,0.00014388365,0.007043853,0.00021766018,0.000101660065,0.000023444865,0.000003751704,0.00087272725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978127,0.00046460555,0.00014653843,0.0005878765,0.00077117886,0.0000018196695,0.0000025143338,0.0000051166207,0.00020763515],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973418,0.0008596404,0.0011105565,0.00010278429,0.00043704256,0.00014816858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628323,0.0011792727,0.001279943,0.00021432198,0.0009517389,0.00009150572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015966863,0.00007411957,0.00056007097,0.00012458113,0.00035050904,0.000005578986,0.00015808633,0.0001780878,0.00025651176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030113664,0.000049558257,0.0003188084,0.0006555325,0.00024423818,0.00019061711,0.00009942844,0.0004797731,0.0000010581592],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016965077,0.0023345146,0.40989646,0.0015133958,0.0048030023,0.000015332924,0.3804773,0.00033856797,0.054756887,0.1291727,0.0040822783,0.010913046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011948365,0.00023936515,0.81076175,0.0005694607,0.0027635682,0.000011224614,0.1614038,0.00006288691,0.0009784832,0.008654087,0.013234281,0.00012627731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009464207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008531015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40086526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005989788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012392577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189319554","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1268","title":"Reimagining Toronto’s Community Councils","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Public administration; Local government; Corporate governance; Citizen journalism; Function (biology); Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Management; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05488240855583334,"score_gpt":0.3888048319306447,"score_spread":0.3339224233748114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189319554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058707576,0.0006793443,0.000030673018,0.024284778,0.00030243726,0.000057545913,0.0000045565175,0.000026989186,0.9159061],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906834,0.00012444613,0.00021828344,0.0044050105,0.0039415834,1.7403825e-7,3.0797312e-7,0.000004416161,0.0006224248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860805,0.00041537182,0.00025054702,0.000042618703,0.0004416231,0.00024179151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992487,0.00008502795,0.00021671086,0.00006618779,0.000249838,0.00013356126],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016337788,0.000071804825,0.0002127581,0.000023575953,0.0013286908,0.00013699789,0.00025951443,0.00009316277,0.000033077242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020803731,0.000058141384,0.0000852936,0.0000777291,0.00039380646,0.000524058,0.000018115716,0.00043459478,0.0000028838638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014369286,0.00003876898,0.000044489425,0.0000023312853,0.000011695295,0.000004809966,0.46457198,1.0912008e-7,0.000052904983,0.52929264,0.0013384181,0.0046274597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003444209,0.00013667616,0.0013497646,0.000014476282,0.000021152266,0.000004755754,0.019631594,5.389819e-7,0.00000882494,0.048584305,0.92980057,0.000102933045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045835946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004081312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9319758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039380832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038723028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32535063","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1198","title":"Teaching Cultural Competency in Legal Clinics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05182770238714918,"score_gpt":0.45440144001984967,"score_spread":0.4025737376327005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32535063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29665393,0.000020508729,0.000025441346,0.21198423,0.0004391197,0.000035948546,9.964723e-7,0.000007157549,0.4908327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877951,0.000027487224,0.00030704623,0.007138878,0.0038901484,3.3700906e-7,4.4581327e-7,0.0000028840695,0.00083765015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900883,0.00035444638,0.00029009266,0.000042058302,0.00017617778,0.00012841645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938416,0.00015285962,0.00024030381,0.000024332881,0.00014096452,0.00005740021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015889233,0.000041936928,0.000121145466,0.000079232464,0.0005957478,0.00017667265,0.000096322394,0.00006436954,0.000017391321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070316857,0.00003625057,0.000046578647,0.00012996291,0.00016168253,0.00082658586,0.000007651551,0.00050460914,0.0000032929854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004869625,0.000037280606,0.0003569468,0.000002267225,0.0000042199363,5.2845087e-7,0.046335228,2.3518584e-7,0.000017749491,0.94668025,0.00076886977,0.0057915654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024845471,0.000029978017,0.002984566,0.00000707868,0.000006094196,0.000004576347,0.009644722,0.000003952121,0.0000012088801,0.026454201,0.9605626,0.000052578867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03156431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003938274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95979375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006666026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005890664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97488457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W348736023","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1208","title":"Charter Eviction: Litigating Out of House and Home","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Charter; Eviction; Appeal; Political science; Law; Justiciability; Politics","score_opus":0.07835314801454228,"score_gpt":0.36866566256107675,"score_spread":0.29031251454653445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W348736023","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96514565,0.00046668795,0.0000031697496,0.019869816,0.00026494692,0.00006191764,0.000003867131,0.000013659837,0.014170293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958004,0.00019198089,0.00009088969,0.00048642317,0.003204077,5.732283e-7,8.6286896e-8,0.000005302962,0.00022027497],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991522,0.00011534447,0.00023582128,0.000052341962,0.00029147236,0.0001528315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928963,0.000046495676,0.00024688986,0.000020277406,0.00026363722,0.00013305387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005314175,0.00006368767,0.00022958417,0.000026146578,0.0004714446,0.000057655194,0.000061814244,0.0000731006,0.000004056347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014944967,0.00004854984,0.00006276769,0.000057692043,0.00052062183,0.0002724766,0.0000318464,0.00011770656,0.000001368747],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030912517,0.00004185412,0.003921514,0.000034726687,0.00010488181,0.0000045020606,0.77510774,3.2792641e-7,0.00024427008,0.21367496,0.0022025458,0.0046317517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005000215,0.00084913557,0.084250934,0.0002398434,0.00025820956,0.00002886663,0.33121115,0.000008196798,0.0002694855,0.056461535,0.52066046,0.0007619618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055726287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00075449166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51845795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008333421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009866088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84241843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W353839816","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1061","title":"Panhandling for Change in Canadian Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06495406747716567,"score_gpt":0.39219049383555005,"score_spread":0.32723642635838435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W353839816","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5329887,0.00015932917,0.000004489007,0.07095562,0.000085273845,0.00028116343,0.000042904885,0.000007360466,0.39547512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992467,0.00010826432,0.000046215537,0.0041844277,0.002872803,0.000005482916,5.710812e-7,0.0000037793563,0.00031149603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994858,0.000028271626,0.00013749886,0.000040444254,0.00008183844,0.00022617329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997181,0.000023819019,0.00004808605,0.000019824782,0.00004156121,0.00014860457],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036795807,0.000035181663,0.00009759794,0.000042417578,0.0006041095,0.000059233007,0.00007923296,0.00006094708,0.000040738778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011656128,0.000033170963,0.00004828682,0.00008157386,0.000115177114,0.00015651798,0.000003390504,0.00007723749,0.0000020622265],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004182012,0.00000850713,0.00010648302,0.0000025327897,0.000003115382,9.0426073e-7,0.0193913,2.9435415e-7,0.0000043432356,0.9727053,0.00006350014,0.007709508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002172081,0.000015991753,0.0013864562,0.0000066300922,0.0000048694046,9.707549e-7,0.0005330756,0.0000048324205,0.0000035589762,0.019316355,0.97846484,0.000045202378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9358743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93582416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97840136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012435537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032865346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46463826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W418860208","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1003","title":"Age Discrimination and Income-Security Benefits: The Long Retreat from Tetreault-Gadoury?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.10765314394162981,"score_gpt":0.40847845253986353,"score_spread":0.30082530859823375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W418860208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9528157,0.00042397168,0.000003560435,0.027041703,0.00010996284,0.00009838155,0.0000114005525,0.000008412467,0.019486902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958479,0.00091110024,0.000013698717,0.0011212832,0.002012004,6.5229136e-7,0.000001879879,0.000004021403,0.00008747907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886733,0.00019953329,0.00026091837,0.00009774642,0.00038023185,0.00019421552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994685,0.00008951699,0.00018652306,0.000064670385,0.00008235428,0.000108424065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006256076,0.00009100724,0.00019131707,0.000038787686,0.0008924101,0.00019977718,0.00014264295,0.00008814348,0.000013727247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012182812,0.00006172297,0.00008563706,0.000095200216,0.00045078693,0.000282513,0.000027534288,0.00015704615,7.467719e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072483155,0.00023236597,0.036538932,0.000019701567,0.000060851795,0.000013427591,0.20853457,5.6079176e-7,0.000040889314,0.6965893,0.0007477593,0.0571492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070440327,0.00020851758,0.70341396,0.000055836506,0.00009285802,0.0000031682446,0.012521927,0.000002272253,0.00003151523,0.27544978,0.0073542222,0.00016152504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021145942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012330573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.666875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013959716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007156738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9853723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W430697676","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1064","title":"See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Remedy No Evil: How the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal is Failing to Protect the Most Fundamental Rights of Residential Tenants","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Fair Housing Act; Renting; Rental housing; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Civil rights","score_opus":0.03292165400689023,"score_gpt":0.32288142651925045,"score_spread":0.2899597725123602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W430697676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.931321,0.00007694305,0.000008834413,0.033972487,0.00025432097,0.00070633076,0.000053451036,0.000014809246,0.0335918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888786,0.00007921801,0.000112947055,0.0015364672,0.0050054477,0.000008420092,0.000001512079,0.000014711246,0.0043626465],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779683,0.00027517235,0.0005021663,0.00018137215,0.00080827903,0.0004361839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886453,0.00009104249,0.00038879976,0.00015165508,0.00032788195,0.00017609162],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011417163,0.00016796943,0.00033715795,0.000055999506,0.0028642588,0.00041308277,0.00046298205,0.00012695638,0.00036922257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084405816,0.0000998942,0.00024691457,0.00027987506,0.00053978513,0.000397418,0.000102207254,0.00048738247,0.00005766811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0039906222,0.0016709717,0.0038031081,0.000232806,0.0014170287,0.0000836061,0.6227539,0.000070832495,0.023768114,0.17795137,0.13143468,0.032822963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008982079,0.00031016985,0.0036427518,0.00014099796,0.000096883654,0.00001788549,0.0023653999,0.000015195254,0.0004110282,0.0025014558,0.9893566,0.00024346789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23363432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10892725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8579219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039545886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074191747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080596","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1448","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Housing Precarity and Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Precarity; Conversation; Human rights; Scholarship; Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Criminology; Law; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.05640807776497122,"score_gpt":0.44322630168952004,"score_spread":0.38681822392454884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94599724,0.000010036444,0.0000015310682,0.038919155,0.0009361938,0.00014576697,0.0000063864504,0.000016609514,0.013967093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83377576,0.000019294788,0.000004955275,0.0006256629,0.16490813,0.0000023278008,0.0000010460569,0.000008021016,0.0006547882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895984,0.00027825264,0.00028419224,0.00008633625,0.00016722374,0.00022416037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951303,0.0000765764,0.00016369953,0.0000535968,0.00010917568,0.00008394819],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066940667,0.00007688099,0.00027435087,0.00009525268,0.0029984063,0.000037355276,0.000070347,0.00011717343,0.00006643125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000407355,0.000050559043,0.000045562992,0.00017248736,0.000089858484,0.000088858586,0.00005208235,0.0003977176,0.000035321824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008645191,0.000040805407,0.00079474645,0.00006359631,0.00004548185,0.00000654758,0.21677311,0.0000021931505,0.000088957444,0.73538357,0.038551055,0.00816348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037048047,0.00013030569,0.029791271,0.00003863987,0.000020746063,4.4263797e-7,0.012803865,7.2148794e-7,0.000024090721,0.018458873,0.93828064,0.000079941754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051988894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009891234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89972955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007376782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054097076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080598","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1454","title":"Property Says No: Relational (In)Equality, Encampments, and Property Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Public property; Political science; Property law; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03307264102321693,"score_gpt":0.26913221870129217,"score_spread":0.23605957767807523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080598","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65658826,0.00012550925,0.000035592544,0.0036188932,0.0002434504,0.00014361237,0.0000060097072,0.00006827451,0.33917043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932945,0.000090379974,0.00008960551,0.00016348454,0.00076858385,0.0000017325503,0.000001430686,0.000009703367,0.0055806115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993987,0.000033005676,0.0002184146,0.0000538846,0.00015817684,0.00013782445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998407,0.0000150098,0.000042037143,0.000028209952,0.000025997697,0.00004805995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030810878,0.00006946085,0.00013829724,0.00010626341,0.00012163492,0.000032383494,0.000044570636,0.00005246421,0.000009002358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001100665,0.00003708933,0.000031312127,0.000091139664,0.000049537375,0.000072323164,0.00003262162,0.00013885267,0.000011721923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019396078,0.00022128025,0.007445826,0.0014564481,0.00079282786,0.00025059923,0.07837518,0.0028637382,0.0019602084,0.7462785,0.12078058,0.039380826],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011880203,0.00009805891,0.023186997,0.00011997361,0.000023867275,0.00002462381,0.00029236218,0.0031143087,0.000026756336,0.004023762,0.9676777,0.00022354486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002528461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022817176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8468971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003940029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017959992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15124589},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080600","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1450","title":"The Colonialism of Eviction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Victoria","funders":"Durham University","keywords":"Eviction; Colonialism; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Scholarship; Law; Criminology; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02718088927478287,"score_gpt":0.37615082545951395,"score_spread":0.3489699361847311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8568319,0.00011920406,0.0000015429424,0.019392801,0.0009220251,0.00009658939,0.000002951552,0.000009714727,0.12262326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98392546,0.00721969,0.00000619912,0.00016292633,0.005233512,1.8981167e-7,3.722157e-7,0.0000034418401,0.0034481955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99921894,0.00017244458,0.00020488395,0.000028089218,0.00021182756,0.00016384371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940944,0.00010506691,0.00022391634,0.000025055453,0.00018579817,0.000050716375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011834581,0.000030104422,0.000094469375,0.00005297047,0.0055242823,0.000034440436,0.00008597967,0.000065755936,0.0000037814307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000098817545,0.000019080817,0.000053075128,0.00018167043,0.0003232773,0.00008892228,7.792612e-7,0.00008260204,0.0000031802492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006076841,0.0000084545945,0.000020914656,0.00000490466,0.000007156281,3.1519113e-7,0.293991,1.1096858e-7,0.0000030543317,0.7051912,0.00043386532,0.0003329747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009818055,0.000040177238,0.0019447719,0.000005829698,0.000008128093,0.0000015427447,0.007413005,4.075648e-7,0.000014374487,0.03002911,0.9604203,0.000024162975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10961975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24465476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95998645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000070862225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004306883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080605","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1452","title":"When Should Publicly Owned Land Be Considered Private in Homeless Encampment Cases? A Critique of Recent Developments in BC","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Covenant; Charter; Political science; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Interlocutory; Sociology","score_opus":0.13780281839369996,"score_gpt":0.3922041117613699,"score_spread":0.2544012933676699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080605","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9422073,0.000057647372,0.0000011776448,0.047843967,0.00010108524,0.00016095143,0.00001090703,0.000009507863,0.009607489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99683833,0.0010484545,0.00008801336,0.0014358397,0.0002869145,0.0000038124142,0.0000021715066,0.0000068863487,0.00028957575],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842674,0.00024094703,0.0005196698,0.00010309404,0.00038186705,0.00032770447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938476,0.00009600846,0.00021423188,0.00004159218,0.00015027708,0.0001131077],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012710091,0.00009338275,0.00037205857,0.00029702336,0.00019027595,0.000085676234,0.00015545443,0.00011924177,0.000051181232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025112432,0.00006788755,0.00005114098,0.00042236433,0.00021682531,0.00029960752,0.000055085577,0.00022378446,0.0000011606338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031093048,0.00040363602,0.03397007,0.00011348847,0.000103956125,0.00055308384,0.17668283,0.0000027803808,0.00041222348,0.7626133,0.0023226815,0.022511043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043012435,0.00021302032,0.10805333,0.0001984562,0.000018956714,0.000024003695,0.0071357894,0.000004647131,0.0004225671,0.039528333,0.8397186,0.0003810892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057624355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06024057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8373959,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001938197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073070277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9569076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080606","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1451","title":"Intersections between Precarious Housing and Residential Tenancy Law: A Review of A Complex Exile and Recent Legal Scholarship on Residential Tenancies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Scholarship; Conversation; Statutory law; Sociology; Precarity; Law; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.15438448970353363,"score_gpt":0.3606752943222165,"score_spread":0.20629080461868288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080606","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017058885,0.99052376,0.000010183582,0.00094361586,0.0003896676,0.00037849174,0.00039264007,0.000017964254,0.005637783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006889316,0.98991984,0.000069858135,0.0005890796,0.0022126618,0.0000074879767,0.000015674168,0.00006523317,0.00023081897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971601,0.0001542015,0.0018517883,0.00034182047,0.00013600559,0.00035607757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99727863,0.00011853313,0.002173021,0.0001666652,0.00012698099,0.00013618928],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010646421,0.0003442104,0.0025681767,0.0005195252,0.00045555562,0.00022827013,0.00020944647,0.00032349944,0.000012554187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011105611,0.0003171919,0.00045697094,0.0003525185,0.0003902253,0.00036751473,0.00015453534,0.0007215211,0.0000062514987],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006962015,0.00013624456,0.000093441115,0.062151887,0.0010871732,0.00010155806,0.0037314738,1.8379062e-7,0.0000016995991,0.7066416,0.004525201,0.22145993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046737638,0.00018209338,0.0006385532,0.023587171,0.00032978095,0.00009115894,0.000018156621,1.8690521e-7,6.6708157e-7,0.0042741494,0.97011477,0.00029593208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055307606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007612427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9655896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017144036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023343677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080617","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1453","title":"Homeless Encampments: A Philosophical Justification","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Poison control; Coercion (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05884370915141079,"score_gpt":0.38698545180383065,"score_spread":0.32814174265241985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9509116,0.000055756424,0.00012596465,0.03564372,0.00028415266,0.00004393612,0.000004118693,0.000028950997,0.012901846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952132,0.0005328101,0.000014880503,0.000613675,0.0034106544,0.0000013056348,0.0000012337005,0.0000041190447,0.00020811924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919367,0.00009662545,0.00020581018,0.00006117546,0.00028703234,0.00015571403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952257,0.000056400313,0.00014192962,0.000033372628,0.00016378498,0.00008193923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051548606,0.000047654776,0.00015224359,0.00018910991,0.0007554252,0.00008256882,0.00009835599,0.00007031931,0.000020790196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097111646,0.000043677148,0.000102981074,0.00049228425,0.00020662212,0.00016535877,0.00001683947,0.00012097587,0.000016155234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025040772,0.00006278142,0.00006283521,0.000019221463,0.00005891904,0.000012163086,0.086365305,0.00000334991,0.00019804253,0.8511305,0.0009967316,0.061065104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00072429975,0.00015425643,0.0037073998,0.00004432375,0.00061489677,0.000018743165,0.7237255,0.000058063466,0.000047416062,0.09468626,0.17591533,0.0003034761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064667873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015386768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7564442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007236015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016947725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97758913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080619","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1449","title":"‘Somebody’s street’: Eviction of Homeless Encampments as a Reflection of Interlocking Colonial and Class Relations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Political science; Colonialism; Criminalization; Sociology; Politics; Gender studies; Indigenous; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.06466532655846849,"score_gpt":0.4627746964803637,"score_spread":0.39810936992189516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99514,0.000056038618,0.000013838449,0.0009193227,0.00030048398,0.00012171963,0.000014679974,0.000011844239,0.0034220791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847555,0.00030184397,0.0000154219,0.000059198297,0.00093329384,0.000004244189,0.000003013866,0.000010977234,0.00019643751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986512,0.00026794535,0.0006108807,0.000071720926,0.00021854213,0.00017972614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987739,0.00015853975,0.0006860925,0.000039500057,0.00027878047,0.000063231986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005408781,0.00007759888,0.0004577148,0.0002330077,0.0005628707,0.000008926393,0.000055260043,0.00020073236,0.00001384162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000091814974,0.0000707775,0.00007445921,0.000281777,0.00013087777,0.00016736232,0.000050039795,0.00031287456,0.000002221129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003582343,0.00014997988,0.09242871,0.0006688718,0.00026366225,0.000007568917,0.43721434,0.000006839012,0.004702422,0.45342562,0.00019850109,0.010575276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0058822576,0.0014961183,0.5577992,0.0014985575,0.0003035665,0.0000039754277,0.34858024,0.000104356746,0.0007775779,0.07059219,0.012540241,0.00042174326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060424134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043396917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46537048,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010605791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025262768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9134362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510767","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1424","title":"Pandemic Evictions: An Analysis of the 2020 Eviction Decisions of Saskatchewan’s Office of Residential Tenancies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Pandemic; Government (linguistics); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Business; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.058156177580634745,"score_gpt":0.4301284038996559,"score_spread":0.37197222631902116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99775314,0.00039443563,0.00008902146,0.00071460113,0.00024720436,0.000076459655,0.000055225977,0.000003914108,0.0006659656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979566,0.000776123,0.000057403,0.00013926461,0.000881142,0.0000018258474,0.0000039983975,0.000008155687,0.00017552078],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778855,0.00057641865,0.0010139513,0.00008706943,0.00036930706,0.00016469203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99717444,0.0003730923,0.0011797078,0.00014241818,0.0010624982,0.00006785692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007532657,0.00008473046,0.0007798214,0.0001561628,0.0005864698,0.0000074119944,0.00015097435,0.00019974071,0.000073374766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037015468,0.000059120233,0.00038361392,0.000825833,0.0002104567,0.00015861726,0.000073431554,0.00032606232,4.6039284e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045857235,0.0007173818,0.27104354,0.0004801822,0.0027968665,0.000007841812,0.5925477,0.0001490677,0.0206367,0.10477245,0.00026882312,0.006120843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008305298,0.000108076085,0.64093465,0.0003082815,0.0016266095,0.0000014366266,0.34893867,0.00002361825,0.00059671246,0.0052381917,0.0012872153,0.00010603395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015246767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059312493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36989108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075520395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011172242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510775","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1426","title":"Negotiating Trauma & Teaching Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Legal education; Mental health; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Law; Reflexivity; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychotherapist; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.07473822658891317,"score_gpt":0.40410784692831275,"score_spread":0.3293696203393996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47239995,0.0006047269,0.00009979238,0.047733504,0.00045815427,0.000042135434,0.0000041686644,0.000018527231,0.47863907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903648,0.000079816506,0.00045352103,0.0030831306,0.004986861,2.9248318e-7,4.993383e-7,0.000006709171,0.0010243848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875927,0.00029807282,0.00027269154,0.0000801656,0.00034042305,0.0002494006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993382,0.000139312,0.00018860293,0.000043421922,0.00016116715,0.00012930913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092370796,0.00007095925,0.00020432047,0.000029667626,0.0015659576,0.0002703139,0.0001201026,0.000087052074,0.000031902364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026679123,0.000067214714,0.000120807614,0.00007698772,0.00029620255,0.00040948906,0.000032953154,0.00031591652,0.000004172359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071726954,0.000026568265,0.0000403085,0.000010427295,0.000014566289,0.000017918277,0.046634663,0.0000014755002,0.00019136976,0.94741523,0.0009659145,0.00467439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022911403,0.000028530461,0.00034380495,0.00004240754,0.000037927624,0.000046288103,0.014595721,0.0000012278175,0.000042278574,0.02796465,0.9565551,0.00011290304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026875507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008424905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95558923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008032876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026853927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511708","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1400","title":"The Jail Accountability & Information Line: Early Reflections on Praxis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Accountability; Hotline; Political science; Prison; Criminalization; Commission; Context (archaeology); Solidarity; Criminology; Public administration; Economic Justice; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.07263124975284106,"score_gpt":0.40821437929065163,"score_spread":0.33558312953781055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8775665,0.00004198984,0.00044321173,0.066701144,0.00029066345,0.00008706248,0.0000075957514,0.000020712081,0.054841112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99354833,0.0002315087,0.000024219653,0.003652505,0.0024615007,0.0000012217305,5.018953e-7,0.000002157152,0.00007803187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991853,0.00011980927,0.0002508182,0.0000406217,0.0002794871,0.00012396657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992752,0.000117250216,0.00020283303,0.000039164937,0.00027865462,0.000086870845],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004745998,0.000049562543,0.00010568075,0.00004549521,0.00186816,0.00026036403,0.00010736152,0.000058575322,0.000014750389],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038044224,0.000035570094,0.00011797323,0.00030444944,0.00020261703,0.00045898533,0.000014727455,0.00021381844,0.000016209153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022498054,0.0000648495,0.00014077919,0.000016377306,0.00009835795,6.414707e-7,0.4439371,0.000020915175,0.000051094787,0.4579719,0.002617273,0.09485574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016474492,0.00017468643,0.0008786705,0.000005287701,0.00011767206,0.0000018934684,0.13835235,0.0000058771407,0.0000071796644,0.0030697978,0.85714954,0.00007230222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024529556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017277595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8545323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009106083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022388583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99943125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511835","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1379","title":"ACCLE and Bill C-75: Implications for Student Legal Clinics & Communities in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16372624617413442,"score_gpt":0.47797874237364124,"score_spread":0.3142524961995068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38199124,0.00006656109,0.00002636982,0.6073082,0.0001309039,0.000108520086,0.000033252498,0.0000033758567,0.010331543],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795143,0.00019281174,0.00015536869,0.01908099,0.00093269604,0.0000032001913,0.0000024891572,0.0000035555129,0.00011460295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993615,0.000115465926,0.00026921314,0.000035449175,0.00010688854,0.00011149178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918735,0.000304153,0.00019161367,0.000029865112,0.00019669246,0.00009033608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043430112,0.00003991042,0.00011784037,0.000036262594,0.00057535665,0.00013786138,0.00010831884,0.000034263292,0.000013950434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025997893,0.00003481732,0.00002417861,0.0001585898,0.000120743076,0.0003445968,0.000019653226,0.00021718038,3.2062738e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015282796,0.00003836323,0.008191669,0.000007686702,0.000018674842,2.1101343e-7,0.09909057,0.0000013937092,0.000007393395,0.88089186,0.009002461,0.0027344364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025811134,0.000021549708,0.023624148,0.0000030853093,0.000010348673,0.0000013264133,0.04203178,0.0000013130802,4.891771e-7,0.004914634,0.92908686,0.000046321926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9301345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95297927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9200844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015141175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031751958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5632661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511836","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1374","title":"Introduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.028462825135497416,"score_gpt":0.3155854556159174,"score_spread":0.28712263048041997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6118534,0.00010747587,0.000043353433,0.36903572,0.00023591174,0.000048661666,0.000014797459,0.000029482191,0.018631145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95696175,0.000010192779,0.00006938973,0.004647404,0.03825096,9.408835e-8,4.4916493e-7,0.000013707547,0.000046032008],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994674,0.00004959704,0.00018509266,0.00004586197,0.0001537255,0.00009834668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996062,0.0000061421547,0.00018393739,0.00001877004,0.000089017674,0.00009595358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014955005,0.000049483955,0.0001459274,0.00003956449,0.0001168533,0.00003673321,0.000051846735,0.000037221675,0.000034205394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069818634,0.00004297924,0.000066175686,0.00011220641,0.00008592571,0.000190585,0.00001563059,0.00015960501,0.000073741445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021898324,0.0000435802,0.000062823456,0.000021582637,0.00008641851,0.000013478204,0.01608495,0.000004022857,0.027542634,0.7936579,0.15921292,0.0030507375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000864698,0.00021795229,0.0017113794,0.0000029059565,0.00004441511,0.00008474331,0.0005186458,0.00000934882,0.0008944614,0.007301495,0.98825604,0.00009394226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011191432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005578054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8290431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042777465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007160454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17526427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511837","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1380","title":"ACCLE Past, Present, and Future: Reflections from ACCLE’s Board Presidents","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership","field":"Nursing","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Political science; On board; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0739648677854137,"score_gpt":0.39170666777445423,"score_spread":0.3177417999890405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511837","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27577484,0.0008308438,0.000021303114,0.7125282,0.0016254771,0.00010137286,0.0000121053,0.000027572252,0.0090782335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9250886,0.00007555422,0.0002555238,0.010644,0.063747965,9.782517e-7,0.0000024432945,0.000020959911,0.00016401485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906707,0.00017278318,0.00024946968,0.000119554905,0.00021359794,0.00017754258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993266,0.00008674002,0.00026160307,0.000056466935,0.00008619881,0.00018240194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013277067,0.00010016839,0.0001941785,0.000057004956,0.00042468106,0.00021505245,0.000104811406,0.00010570256,0.000032733125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035316327,0.0000950386,0.00006951545,0.000112992035,0.000105533625,0.00052394817,0.00001078514,0.00033234054,0.0000058039395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024341203,0.00056369003,0.0069682356,0.00017231911,0.0005076156,0.000019494151,0.39317903,0.0000022620918,0.009092894,0.015622818,0.5324283,0.039009206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010549319,0.00024061429,0.07066418,0.00002280278,0.00019636311,0.000033123317,0.010812063,0.0000043822456,0.00045296169,0.010214131,0.90614855,0.00015587943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002332139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009671151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70188427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057463225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008410057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38755617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512173","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1366","title":"How Affirmative Action Context Shapes Collegiate Outcomes at America’s Selective Colleges and Universities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University; Syracuse University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Higher education; Political science; Action (physics); Law; History","score_opus":0.03351142535275058,"score_gpt":0.3849638267295667,"score_spread":0.3514524013768161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8876408,0.00017235431,0.000001822641,0.08864508,0.000114470895,0.00014493494,0.000017559587,0.000008523643,0.023254491],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774924,0.00058652664,0.00002047169,0.0007771538,0.00043706145,0.0000013827624,2.444807e-7,0.000004377914,0.020680366],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902976,0.00026667953,0.00011348409,0.000076329314,0.00031576277,0.00019801386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990324,0.00027878472,0.0002304591,0.000016963213,0.00034609897,0.000095294236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021941109,0.000080831116,0.00027095963,0.00012066635,0.0010884445,0.00012863957,0.00007734518,0.000057624515,0.00002885968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006777527,0.00006759122,0.000062337975,0.00017384179,0.00071393803,0.0004616876,0.000047800688,0.0001314231,0.0000035849646],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017350799,0.000072583134,0.009581153,0.00004116394,0.00049094204,0.000004918228,0.55898106,7.3437906e-7,0.00024866516,0.41285342,0.015881127,0.0016707124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008281849,0.00016949137,0.063476644,0.000013841615,0.000030479823,0.0000028197173,0.58313,0.000001344446,0.000038308182,0.0014830218,0.35070133,0.00012450288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051291073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024286602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4113704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048612017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005249344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83715457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512271","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1343","title":"Issue 2: A Human Right to Self-Government over First Nations Child and Family Services and Beyond: Implications of the Caring Society Case","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Tribunal; Government (linguistics); Human services; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Child protection; Public administration; Economic growth; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.012023446822483264,"score_gpt":0.3079686206259714,"score_spread":0.29594517380348817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94519407,0.00020005422,4.1446273e-7,0.026299592,0.00006173791,0.00019848347,0.00003098904,0.000005580272,0.0280091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972781,0.00023704123,0.00007214506,0.0016781251,0.0005767364,0.000002173412,1.7772464e-7,0.0000044992453,0.00015101778],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992288,0.000050367107,0.00020433076,0.00008782358,0.00028365987,0.00014505986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994842,0.00007503626,0.00020932445,0.000047213423,0.000103160746,0.00008107816],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021482215,0.00008026648,0.000178579,0.000015079449,0.0031212538,0.00008445833,0.0001032369,0.00006718315,0.00000697747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017110957,0.0000544179,0.000086716056,0.00012495954,0.00020182447,0.00018521294,0.00012009252,0.00011767141,3.9685796e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060619495,0.000090023685,0.02175752,0.00013803746,0.0002764864,0.0000018500416,0.58251923,0.0000026645137,0.0007385201,0.3933695,0.00079368445,0.00030642026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012641028,0.00012601685,0.54997194,0.00013158357,0.00024108487,0.000055462093,0.12864882,0.0000067713745,0.00009871714,0.002761345,0.3163657,0.0003285031],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021443669,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026933704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5282144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016420834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030232079,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512565","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1312","title":"Learning, Teaching & Practising Systemic Advocacy in Legal Clinics: A Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Conversation; Windsor; Public relations; Legal education; Political science; Medicine; Systemic therapy; Medical education; Sociology; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.0518633316414894,"score_gpt":0.45091875470452697,"score_spread":0.39905542306303754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512565","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7995789,0.000030877763,0.00012749754,0.06988848,0.00067370204,0.00008700918,5.923506e-7,0.000014872387,0.12959807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909833,0.000051084884,0.00025835293,0.0021991027,0.005435133,7.125543e-7,8.7994556e-7,0.0000058209844,0.0010655917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847823,0.0006581946,0.00039880833,0.00006723399,0.000240018,0.00015751774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987143,0.00025477365,0.00062855426,0.000032645792,0.00030967148,0.000060041068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028056363,0.000054943786,0.00014110479,0.00017219695,0.00092863786,0.00028376558,0.00008368179,0.0000991763,0.00003895114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022852838,0.00005498199,0.000044338576,0.00020558432,0.00023986744,0.0013562355,0.000012493278,0.00072198885,0.000014252808],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035094665,0.00005829969,0.0023916655,0.00000924503,0.0000173094,0.0000017339721,0.33775538,9.741963e-7,0.00010055496,0.65115076,0.0010809533,0.007398017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004033666,0.00007326374,0.0018607847,0.000042828466,0.00001596492,0.000029066592,0.051935002,0.0000053546773,0.0000029105631,0.0029695425,0.94258386,0.0000780795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032687183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031608695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94150287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020604988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016673637,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9737542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512623","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1296","title":"Issue 1: Explaining the Economic Disparity Gap in the Rate of Substantiated Child Maltreatment in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Socioeconomic status; Demography; Welfare; Psychology; Poverty; Harm; Medicine; Demographic economics; Psychiatry; Population; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03056519418895662,"score_gpt":0.3152222353705845,"score_spread":0.2846570411816279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96742505,0.00013932436,2.596001e-7,0.0088616405,0.00017684711,0.00006267713,0.0000104739975,6.9245e-7,0.02332303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965737,0.00005133735,0.0000011340372,0.002371583,0.0009787874,0.0000010723115,5.9682213e-7,0.0000044951958,0.000017305601],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999252,0.00019012477,0.00029063833,0.000057289297,0.000054572287,0.00015534267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961823,0.00008495627,0.00018769394,0.00007109968,0.000015465537,0.000022579554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038109696,0.00006659505,0.00018341078,0.00004146703,0.00012340871,0.000014112663,0.00012675358,0.00003465754,0.000090439615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000054830207,0.00003868639,0.000040160616,0.00006721169,0.00010192111,0.000042334144,0.000010267197,0.00017504123,0.0000024273688],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067691767,0.00028692166,0.07804323,0.000017983983,0.00039666024,0.00015613876,0.20870732,0.000017862812,0.000022474767,0.6995058,0.0066589043,0.0055097598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023169478,0.0001495137,0.97189057,0.000039591247,0.000031304415,0.000064098815,0.009733087,0.000007894098,0.00007534553,0.0025230814,0.0130770365,0.000091504575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87471867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9443397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89384735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015392876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025588536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15775852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518156","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1189","title":"The E-Team Project: A Teamwork Approach to Clinical Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Notice; Legal education; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Public relations; Passion; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07516484529182203,"score_gpt":0.4836582694816039,"score_spread":0.40849342418978185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018444614,0.00003186987,0.00017540886,0.2086329,0.0011494156,0.0001661217,8.3030955e-7,0.000010098179,0.77138877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641174,0.000061947074,0.0009071651,0.014713118,0.015920978,0.0000067913506,6.0176336e-7,0.000006138213,0.0042658374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99862206,0.000512367,0.00037377543,0.000069145855,0.00026204967,0.00016057692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988494,0.000305185,0.000306301,0.00006157384,0.0003721384,0.000105386585],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030770935,0.000052717078,0.00012283362,0.000069397436,0.001517694,0.00044167132,0.0001868436,0.00008308518,0.0000035183505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00173933,0.000037331196,0.0000730937,0.0003414389,0.00027340525,0.00041549816,0.000017853767,0.00038479155,0.000006595841],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014474848,0.00013059044,0.00009538097,0.0000018895607,0.000010898106,1.9985867e-8,0.022134881,1.1813281e-7,0.0000012193418,0.891687,0.06182053,0.024103014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010292121,0.000046805966,0.0012392894,0.0000040234495,0.000011911686,0.0000038993926,0.011937098,0.0000014821601,5.944929e-7,0.009661279,0.97694296,0.000047762845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010465877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006129469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068894675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032188124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518171","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1255","title":"Charter Litigation, Social and Economic Rights & Civil Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Appeal; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Human rights","score_opus":0.04032466827155654,"score_gpt":0.34451172540794245,"score_spread":0.3041870571363859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73249865,0.00014784896,0.000003760851,0.062101707,0.00027422767,0.00006904405,0.00001584027,0.000008053298,0.20488086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898667,0.00012966034,0.000010879708,0.0008042414,0.008802143,0.0000012598898,4.3253544e-7,0.0000028088125,0.00038187997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993658,0.00004423769,0.00018607384,0.000075594464,0.00015922157,0.00016908039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947506,0.000020719805,0.00028868596,0.000028572704,0.000109301676,0.00007765944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030046006,0.00007185018,0.00019355104,0.000033399596,0.0056706406,0.00024092599,0.00012229157,0.0000876068,0.000021936747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048795107,0.000060973085,0.000069826885,0.00001551436,0.0014737158,0.00038436268,0.000039251296,0.00010765987,0.0000063882926],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011619878,0.000011329908,0.0011956192,0.0000042832753,0.000038060985,0.0000013419202,0.020277146,2.042076e-8,0.000010933791,0.9755323,0.002337994,0.0005793306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044477682,0.000023339206,0.06259545,0.000017006361,0.000034394776,0.000007696389,0.0010473686,2.318721e-7,0.0000056038043,0.49047494,0.44522536,0.00012384354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021699322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040797826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48505738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007303155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032586808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9956238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518246","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1228","title":"Book Review: Women’s Rights to Social Security and Social Protection, edited by Beth Goldblatt & Lucie Lamarche","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026427584752201635,"score_gpt":0.3437891635255739,"score_spread":0.3173615787733723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.103627935,0.009213425,0.00003575986,0.86776155,0.0007846174,0.0010307031,0.00025563774,0.00009583257,0.01719456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6922145,0.030395083,0.0000424174,0.16943496,0.08953378,0.00015684492,0.0000062504128,0.00008887762,0.018127251],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730664,0.0005441195,0.0005693757,0.00021767904,0.00066369126,0.0006984769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99871856,0.00009028114,0.00047656486,0.000054581542,0.0003852932,0.00027469394],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015060817,0.00023401601,0.0006656901,0.00012365454,0.003920821,0.00010419791,0.00021925925,0.00033661735,0.000064774125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025623897,0.00015721981,0.0002136444,0.00029886852,0.0013760002,0.00046616598,0.00011013487,0.00037159966,0.000009427151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099032935,0.00008866305,0.000014229755,0.00014959952,0.00018399395,0.0000024789565,0.19559243,2.6076707e-9,0.00021867205,0.06475842,0.73375165,0.005140805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069044257,0.00009514094,0.00040415625,0.00009004923,0.000047323952,0.000003883301,0.0019323403,1.8254164e-8,0.000021517206,0.03942358,0.9570551,0.00023648165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005664232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015146835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6983265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051349634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032462255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99737597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409081055","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1494","title":"Mary Jane Mossman’s Quiet Rebels: A History of Ontario Women Lawyers (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; Political science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; History; Physics","score_opus":0.012043075870505326,"score_gpt":0.22651986554812747,"score_spread":0.21447678967762215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409081055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2753011,0.00085696176,0.000001957664,0.005520799,0.001271806,0.000098703735,0.000034950415,0.000010356163,0.7169034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14014684,0.00054982683,0.000032983942,0.0014235075,0.00089900475,5.2414595e-7,0.0000010741012,0.00000719452,0.856939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909157,0.00013215387,0.00022104195,0.000086944274,0.00023723354,0.00023105032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994228,0.000025268952,0.0002213833,0.00006127006,0.000121570614,0.00014771978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000446356,0.00006927837,0.00026074826,0.0002795878,0.00052995805,0.00005596214,0.00020245246,0.00012857717,0.0002277956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002336298,0.00008689706,0.000120592114,0.00010912834,0.0010684141,0.00031224012,0.000039536353,0.0002369449,0.0000011609387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001554975,0.00007132888,0.00021242301,0.000059917955,0.00014197186,0.000045131066,0.2799007,7.5185744e-7,0.00003122259,0.40973902,0.30858243,0.0010596196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040197067,0.000039981656,0.0012256631,0.000023446994,0.000043572076,0.0000014570641,0.0047048256,1.1822276e-7,0.0000011036144,0.0016061903,0.9918773,0.00007437122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9585886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95117545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6832949,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01042566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008494052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409081068","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1490","title":"Probative of Prejudice: Procedural Unfairness Underlying Security Threat Group Classifications in Canadian Prisons","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06450815909641282,"score_gpt":0.4076119381828813,"score_spread":0.34310377908646844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409081068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7655705,0.00033048796,0.000044495177,0.10857496,0.00017475037,0.0003589918,0.000017904702,0.000009993252,0.12491787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989907,0.00009869857,0.00004176298,0.0005068637,0.0002034003,0.0000040259547,6.3833386e-7,0.0000032210637,0.00015067935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998983,0.00014801515,0.00031860225,0.000084979285,0.0001945344,0.00027084808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993276,0.000093447925,0.000201439,0.00004168867,0.00020452269,0.00013132904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006640577,0.00006976038,0.00021765596,0.00019360457,0.00060733064,0.000055237466,0.00016958789,0.000109027955,0.0000064997666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019796615,0.000066089524,0.000066605404,0.0004063392,0.00049604423,0.0003221461,0.000018527957,0.00020846052,3.9006582e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017017735,0.000041822674,0.0031619065,0.000052045107,0.000016702366,0.0000022079666,0.05907064,6.6453754e-7,0.000043043103,0.93658763,0.00037901336,0.0006273362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011925586,0.0002052265,0.18525693,0.00074404327,0.00016350065,0.000010221673,0.12700444,0.000033191976,0.0000910719,0.5828316,0.10209261,0.00037455052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6570143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87626344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35375595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040370284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023887558,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4671158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409081083","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1493","title":"Navigating the Paths to Justice: A Study on the Role of Social Supports in Responding to Justiciable Events","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Social justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.02408453312693147,"score_gpt":0.4089622230107402,"score_spread":0.3848776898838087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409081083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752385,0.000017430304,0.000018295284,0.015829625,0.0001595688,0.00018518628,0.0000031672319,0.000002937089,0.008545299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968199,0.000007233075,0.000008775878,0.0020313095,0.0009074234,0.000006866051,9.949185e-8,0.000004244573,0.00021413273],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853396,0.0003945109,0.00037270237,0.000088840505,0.00038718036,0.00022277315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991765,0.00035059542,0.00019198528,0.000059571237,0.00016939991,0.000051931118],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018892376,0.00007570947,0.00022673563,0.00020050947,0.0014521831,0.000072879106,0.00022908422,0.000050651048,0.00001253762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005652485,0.000050609204,0.00010572646,0.0013706156,0.00008187248,0.00007262026,0.0000647225,0.00031839905,0.0000015397493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016109986,0.00026634056,0.001999983,0.0000153059,0.0000790153,0.0000068417203,0.64636433,0.000045754376,0.00027936508,0.32854766,0.00036550435,0.021868816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016153684,0.00015215095,0.005484256,0.00007757245,0.0003594073,6.245885e-7,0.9841756,0.000007519913,0.00003823431,0.0033372936,0.0061448393,0.000060942326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015749726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076751616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3378113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014880262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031125525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5293378","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1192","title":"When Law Reform Is Not Enough: A Case Study on Social Change and the Role that Lawyers and Legal Clinics Ought to Play","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal College of Anaesthetists","keywords":"Grassroots; Law reform; Political science; Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Scholarship; Injustice; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Social movement; Politics","score_opus":0.14543805735670856,"score_gpt":0.44527065231704566,"score_spread":0.2998325949603371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5293378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54632497,0.000031254513,0.0000016312547,0.36887044,0.00024452005,0.00020929752,0.000012506133,0.000007900321,0.08429746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94961965,0.00004000486,0.000029354062,0.045103848,0.0046000816,0.000007702023,3.3173217e-7,0.0000082701645,0.00059076044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986338,0.00041989327,0.00028166745,0.000112442154,0.0003470758,0.00020510067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906594,0.00028097694,0.00030301098,0.000059175796,0.0001592165,0.00013165965],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021518455,0.00010166043,0.00024171208,0.00007143183,0.0022381314,0.00048201284,0.00011204315,0.000105173436,0.000013327496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017101213,0.0000712068,0.00005928933,0.00014049289,0.00046895628,0.0006854302,0.00004410491,0.00041414268,0.000002575888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082295235,0.00006719915,0.000060536877,0.0000020249074,0.000028602017,0.000007759979,0.36612603,8.416185e-9,0.0000011269258,0.62734836,0.00047702892,0.005799047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012157833,0.00019701314,0.001041423,0.000005442792,0.000056909117,0.00006305325,0.123469196,0.0000013533905,0.000003909484,0.005200253,0.8686431,0.00010256837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11614934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023244675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8681661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009343118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002148322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55165375","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1041","title":"Standard of Review from Decisions of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Rental housing; Renting; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07541170921499277,"score_gpt":0.3390322300614727,"score_spread":0.2636205208464799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55165375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85259694,0.009806173,0.00002313382,0.040281475,0.00042230796,0.00024317813,0.00010366445,0.000005917309,0.096517235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940895,0.0036882276,0.000076895005,0.0008804982,0.00075032446,1.6102261e-7,2.5040927e-7,0.0000033412923,0.00051081984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988551,0.00015109786,0.0004002617,0.00004771415,0.00042428583,0.000121510966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992622,0.00006782248,0.0003941944,0.00005417109,0.00015931885,0.00006226091],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045382476,0.00005663895,0.00032894843,0.000027881426,0.00040212538,0.00002388112,0.00018812696,0.00005250472,0.00027976366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012993343,0.000030574567,0.00019759913,0.000129396,0.00037860777,0.00014155803,0.000033511704,0.00017706538,5.279509e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030106257,0.00042181584,0.0025160247,0.00011263584,0.0003080745,0.000018096196,0.1454404,0.0000011430265,0.00066872797,0.7426575,0.02574702,0.08180752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008342857,0.00017579147,0.0037920168,0.0008858707,0.00013119869,0.000005043393,0.00051461096,8.765094e-7,0.00021217126,0.014298107,0.9790497,0.00010035482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13818365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08540161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9533027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012527012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000293874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9312874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570880264","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1063","title":"Judging Poverty: Using International Human Rights Law to Refine the Scope of Charter Rights","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Scope (computer science); Political science; International human rights law; Poverty; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03899741146625104,"score_gpt":0.360057755886087,"score_spread":0.321060344419836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570880264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.670666,0.000023534156,0.0000069204125,0.008795692,0.00019279135,0.000074433585,0.0000050171075,0.0000056706776,0.32022995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99175143,0.000010992631,0.00013484858,0.0031759571,0.0028302707,4.5045988e-7,5.807733e-7,0.0000048533147,0.0020906394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885726,0.000093961724,0.00034678486,0.00007773906,0.00043223405,0.00019203841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995257,0.000022448572,0.00017212429,0.0000480518,0.00013673404,0.00009493274],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048057537,0.00008039541,0.00019399387,0.0000739276,0.0017412791,0.00011654902,0.00022519386,0.000058640304,0.0005200217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000035339385,0.00004736522,0.00008494457,0.00008506728,0.00028776386,0.00023333372,0.000023915265,0.000120918165,0.000006269584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018599945,0.0000325118,0.00000841922,0.000002193378,0.000040292434,0.000005574282,0.024001172,0.0000015025302,0.00015513296,0.97376317,0.0012236501,0.0007478026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037046865,0.000042865464,0.0007625822,0.000049085622,0.000017094168,0.0000069141706,0.0001494122,0.000001468457,0.00021204549,0.09552963,0.9027586,0.00009980737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024085362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010007146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.901535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000112776535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001037254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W582896464","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1002","title":"\"Deference\" versus \"Security of Tenure\": Eviction of Residents of Subsidized Housing Co-Operatives at the Superior Court of Justice for Ontario, 1992-2009","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Jurisdiction; Deference; Subsidy; Economic Justice; Subsidized housing; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Fair Housing Act; Business; Law; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.05483541657108347,"score_gpt":0.38527519214519135,"score_spread":0.33043977557410786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W582896464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.990813,0.0002680872,0.00000980093,0.0040204795,0.00018859278,0.00015043601,0.00005999972,0.0000019072096,0.0044876984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889743,0.00030809955,0.000062413455,0.000121033765,0.0005284163,5.9847605e-7,6.3348574e-7,0.0000031282145,0.00007824451],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845356,0.00016299756,0.000517267,0.000083918116,0.0005916138,0.00019065606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827945,0.00023593081,0.000991449,0.00005584801,0.00037887832,0.00005846646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009897607,0.00008467075,0.00041062347,0.00004221165,0.0005195467,0.000023132974,0.00019200567,0.00010808117,0.000020372101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030164904,0.000062544146,0.0001906669,0.00019104689,0.0008950705,0.00024363144,0.000017723602,0.00011303807,8.179637e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0033137966,0.00042176738,0.012039299,0.00015701335,0.00020044915,0.0000022614556,0.6266123,0.000019144283,0.01629505,0.33464196,0.0036179184,0.002679015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009978476,0.0040687528,0.74682426,0.00050077034,0.0009979398,0.0000056997656,0.15814054,0.00001874095,0.01900274,0.043456234,0.016428104,0.0005777352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30247793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20710035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73478496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016418897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083358353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.807368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W583895045","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1043","title":"The Meaning of Compensation in Institutional Abuse Programs","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.06964690808809366,"score_gpt":0.3217192238368244,"score_spread":0.25207231574873074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W583895045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8775807,0.000051325133,0.00000936841,0.0065703653,0.00016573993,0.000054256096,4.1429644e-7,0.0000027457868,0.115565054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988467,0.0002676964,0.00006724016,0.00023755654,0.0003814447,5.2874026e-7,1.4206613e-7,0.0000011281444,0.00019755274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995106,0.000049361322,0.0002143669,0.000024504538,0.00011668924,0.00008446293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973446,0.000026953456,0.00014684927,0.000012900993,0.00005096237,0.000027875349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005192336,0.000024966728,0.000075567856,0.00003733893,0.00038775054,0.000039871917,0.000058551675,0.000027986625,0.000017679391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026551881,0.000019386542,0.00003092574,0.00006484744,0.00022922056,0.00011563412,0.000006488637,0.00006198877,0.0000018088696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005982693,0.00002533605,0.001327369,0.0000018366048,0.000006153696,6.704055e-7,0.06942157,0.0000020643863,0.000007348882,0.8715678,0.000028083352,0.057605803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001424796,0.00007331021,0.032934777,0.000060918068,0.000010560066,0.000012294268,0.025233604,0.00010924033,0.000009085954,0.017503139,0.92248034,0.0001479511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009990172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003046621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010841356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008810923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2982303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W597991928","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1015","title":"New \"Flexible\" Employment Standards Regulation in British Columbia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.018201731007849144,"score_gpt":0.34907004354517834,"score_spread":0.3308683125373292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W597991928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9375058,0.0001485542,0.00040663022,0.006214268,0.0002896502,0.000114370254,0.000021009533,0.000012411574,0.055287324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917115,0.00013634306,0.00014857303,0.0016089992,0.0022414573,1.7821068e-7,5.889975e-7,0.0000052330397,0.004147147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989559,0.00005748577,0.00027645443,0.000052201478,0.00044887993,0.00020908608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952286,0.00002195928,0.00014862492,0.000023431265,0.00016021964,0.0001228831],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013421898,0.000033526307,0.00013010335,0.00005044484,0.00044915907,0.00028518375,0.00007198169,0.00007423419,0.00012551689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050470764,0.00004695772,0.000047357014,0.00018865621,0.00010408777,0.00023084178,0.000014305741,0.00010227623,1.1522961e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019021505,0.00006526324,0.00650511,0.0000027285573,0.000022262186,0.000017669858,0.01703644,6.43317e-7,0.000058968,0.84086096,0.015381,0.12002993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006297843,0.000045776073,0.41983163,0.00002511737,0.000007053381,0.000002260701,0.0017041279,9.811852e-8,0.0000078370795,0.03274339,0.54494303,0.000059896855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5743586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79036385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80811757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030894342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006515286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4284758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W598423153","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1058","title":"Organizing for Accountability: Community Legal Clinics and Police Complaints","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Accountability; Criminology; Political science; Business; Public relations; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.14567985611728657,"score_gpt":0.467528066604416,"score_spread":0.3218482104871294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W598423153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686312,0.000018439612,0.000042667507,0.010611819,0.00012498371,0.00007947657,0.000017404356,0.000009915904,0.020464096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99178666,0.00047821397,0.00017687421,0.0043815514,0.002983169,5.4065555e-7,8.91202e-7,0.000007793217,0.00018431914],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989356,0.00035606133,0.00027123545,0.00005187819,0.00016072743,0.00022452281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988325,0.00053958164,0.00024580897,0.00005515219,0.00019709284,0.0001298558],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017817877,0.000070468224,0.00020968032,0.0000582788,0.0025543524,0.00019888117,0.0001376405,0.00010772319,0.00001647381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019219874,0.00006651169,0.000071222465,0.000114677285,0.0004618167,0.0005049778,0.000041454387,0.00034304216,0.0000011642043],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011312452,0.00017518285,0.0042218408,0.000032941276,0.00006309055,8.524775e-7,0.5459869,5.2678246e-7,0.00012597418,0.43497804,0.000990406,0.013311136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089249236,0.00018454882,0.028192429,0.000021343438,0.000082618666,0.00006263933,0.09178795,0.0000072865037,0.0000024991507,0.013802705,0.86480314,0.00016033735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34645307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08798561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86381274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002269318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W609023248","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1206","title":"A Road to Home: The Right to Housing In Canada and Around the World","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wellesley Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Right to the city; Political science; Public administration; Law; Economic growth; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.030145471920515615,"score_gpt":0.3342277108108299,"score_spread":0.30408223889031427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W609023248","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8376121,0.00022524931,0.000003116323,0.11247694,0.00029551866,0.00012028988,0.0000038046408,0.000002887463,0.049260117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883402,0.0000066317857,0.000038523445,0.008472581,0.0025683863,0.0000011953753,2.9770039e-8,0.000005020397,0.00056744297],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888897,0.00020613027,0.00019296947,0.00006123016,0.00040636316,0.0002443183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994428,0.00010128222,0.00009382343,0.00005265039,0.000089167326,0.00022025585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095510896,0.00006302777,0.00015711872,0.000058751102,0.00053138984,0.00018261462,0.0002303177,0.000027989685,0.0000042587935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016724426,0.00003616501,0.000024589073,0.00038779664,0.00020464817,0.00012366858,0.00006442782,0.00019405458,0.0000013614514],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006178683,0.000017763425,0.0044100247,0.0000037599254,0.000027821729,0.000041978034,0.7915381,0.000025424317,0.000008778051,0.18243626,0.01564057,0.005787731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026757186,0.000032904234,0.006906013,0.0000164277,0.000012905735,0.0000035281648,0.02660646,0.000002202971,0.0000048705183,0.008276469,0.9577714,0.000099230834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96487564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9923679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94213086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005334048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015013028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40870747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W631262145","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1034","title":"When Old Meets New: Civil Remedies in the Criminal Context - A New Proposal for Compensating Victims of Crime","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.07843927175799158,"score_gpt":0.3585832718192156,"score_spread":0.28014400006122403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W631262145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5597382,0.002456141,0.005044152,0.1880494,0.0017123972,0.002537639,0.0000549004,0.00005487756,0.24035229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932074,0.000089410845,0.0017503728,0.0020895926,0.0025360393,0.000001237768,6.9577015e-7,0.000008573782,0.0003166705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986606,0.00036453633,0.00037341562,0.000079124984,0.00031136477,0.00021095984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991822,0.00019966564,0.00034286652,0.0000492018,0.00014578039,0.000080267135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015321561,0.00008208441,0.00022308092,0.00007693782,0.0004622322,0.000084997235,0.00017823055,0.00006339469,0.000013112887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007314961,0.00006048848,0.00008885811,0.00009132847,0.00024339296,0.00029111627,0.000016357833,0.00018768113,8.428917e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097268945,0.000038473216,0.0000311739,0.00005072547,0.00001646797,0.000004278892,0.20382197,3.748031e-7,0.00034796578,0.78573763,0.0048093945,0.0050442438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002974864,0.0011678668,0.0013591694,0.00024874936,0.00040744737,0.00006428368,0.33349958,0.0000066937355,0.0007301506,0.18397999,0.4752548,0.0003063828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030330356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0154607715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6017577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050153125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084277906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97612673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W63491074","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1013","title":"Family Arbitration: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Two step; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.03947905874857221,"score_gpt":0.35346821104787823,"score_spread":0.313989152299306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W63491074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15334466,0.00060683046,0.00089433003,0.009374968,0.00052515196,0.00016484494,0.00000584541,0.000018401153,0.83506495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98292696,0.00011530407,0.00021279335,0.003667428,0.012318672,4.034704e-7,4.0401915e-7,0.000009041636,0.0007489902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850625,0.000102159116,0.00046204557,0.00008500079,0.00052442413,0.00032009807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990211,0.00007634092,0.000358885,0.00003943529,0.00031778452,0.0001864263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001613256,0.000090372145,0.0002863922,0.000084386775,0.00080153166,0.00016801941,0.00014736035,0.00012359,0.000029293904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000716815,0.00008196912,0.00011619987,0.00022473779,0.0003102715,0.00046115066,0.000019475885,0.00021000412,0.000013009964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052970106,0.000059379843,0.00022406396,0.000025836656,0.000047155918,0.000009419097,0.015615097,2.7914282e-7,0.00031815315,0.9764277,0.0016690666,0.0055508944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015774679,0.00024881432,0.0046028425,0.00007605691,0.00006296781,0.000012923622,0.012455589,0.0000012153987,0.00014399801,0.045486853,0.9350476,0.00028366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04450365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012415991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9333785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011583492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048852264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9618591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64864323","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1019","title":"Religious Tribunals and the Ontario Arbitration Act, 1991: The Catalyst for Change","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Business; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.041402898975508244,"score_gpt":0.34143323659385677,"score_spread":0.3000303376183485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64864323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24532346,0.0018124165,0.0001101561,0.5158557,0.00036206044,0.0007559497,0.00006493005,0.000014998018,0.2357003],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97828823,0.00029615773,0.00005487343,0.014115514,0.0066163596,0.000006269857,0.0000018338666,0.0000029830362,0.00061778666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992881,0.000112291906,0.0001977542,0.00004638122,0.00018711174,0.00016840207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993227,0.00026109087,0.0002059039,0.00003355859,0.00011332668,0.000063435444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082655315,0.000058802627,0.00015619086,0.000021962207,0.0012804408,0.000095586445,0.00010331941,0.00005318879,0.000004318722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000840328,0.000033075787,0.00009650113,0.00005029161,0.0013973775,0.00017313819,0.000012930716,0.00013703448,6.0126257e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045833236,0.000008774171,0.000036803907,0.0000018972406,0.000023361325,3.470203e-7,0.03930541,2.1573385e-7,0.000002181206,0.95837504,0.0010697623,0.0011303615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058646663,0.00003191976,0.0004033987,0.000004902268,0.00005397088,0.000013683193,0.0012188457,0.0000013377073,0.000004393505,0.018048175,0.9795847,0.00004822999],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20025437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16435252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012209332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007587095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9848245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648694678","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1194","title":"The Role of Technology in the Provision of Poverty Law Services","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal service; Work (physics); Poverty; Legal research; Public relations; Legal profession; Realization (probability); Political science; Engineering ethics; Business; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.013646776839421062,"score_gpt":0.3646321301634562,"score_spread":0.35098535332403513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648694678","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35152608,0.00017621872,0.000002914692,0.39583632,0.00012527134,0.00009670235,0.0000023810346,0.0000035888313,0.25223053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99688494,0.000058118134,0.000025969093,0.002591584,0.00039541873,6.8919417e-7,1.3104868e-7,0.0000015287256,0.000041620715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992993,0.00018546253,0.00022704058,0.000025888467,0.0001829696,0.000079344725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991941,0.00019639813,0.00036094186,0.000044968056,0.00019096165,0.0000126180275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001262666,0.000028063103,0.00008744692,0.00005528738,0.00041724643,0.000046671994,0.00019999499,0.00006267105,0.000003846443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001682475,0.00001563779,0.000030075129,0.00028538852,0.000330961,0.00022415968,0.000013586544,0.00018378535,3.926129e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008124349,0.000033792345,0.0002852606,0.000004324523,0.0000047375174,4.0468628e-8,0.032021396,1.124814e-7,0.00022915538,0.9615113,0.00008966698,0.0058120773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011256601,0.000044032422,0.0012837105,0.00000841804,0.000006595102,0.0000013249983,0.037103526,0.000002205996,0.00013529898,0.25097042,0.71031207,0.000019850417],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021596484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006683262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7105409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016530059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023112034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W653491163","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1023","title":"Book Review: The Heirness vs the Establishment: Mrs. Campbell's Campaign for Legal Justice, by Constance Backhouse and Nancy L. Backhouse","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.01376282955315064,"score_gpt":0.31582544102968446,"score_spread":0.3020626114765338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W653491163","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035348642,0.2988434,0.0004983703,0.5716779,0.00069010403,0.0012756165,0.0004373278,0.000040907318,0.1230015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44790486,0.13859169,0.00019233274,0.38924426,0.011133753,0.000028742836,0.000005354047,0.000035419285,0.012863604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847645,0.0002700489,0.00040494377,0.00011736389,0.00034165767,0.00038954648],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985545,0.0005078773,0.0003991892,0.00009264974,0.0002811986,0.0001645596],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010510209,0.00014488667,0.00032567148,0.000023701446,0.0022288328,0.00019285487,0.00028021756,0.0000827871,0.000037365582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023844125,0.00008915324,0.00013110766,0.00012464428,0.0026300964,0.00046147406,0.000035194273,0.00025596563,0.000002128431],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018489009,0.000021538888,0.0000069665803,0.000047592,0.0000248945,0.0000010433745,0.0019993004,5.831291e-7,0.0000025324402,0.6263764,0.37063423,0.000866436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037419042,0.000050042167,0.000019864125,0.000086352644,0.00015663855,0.000024995097,0.0012887586,0.0000013997882,0.000005637041,0.0007765814,0.997097,0.00011854414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027304024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007860446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62646276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012462522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014711331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W653657508","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1005","title":"\"But Only on a Question of Law\": Examining the Scope of Appellate Review of the Landlord and Tenant Board","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.026911403691348684,"score_gpt":0.28708022031202696,"score_spread":0.26016881662067826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W653657508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58627725,0.0016835667,0.0000088148,0.03505055,0.00017297958,0.00024719283,0.000005907815,0.000005220552,0.3765485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96625954,0.0010163386,0.000012598167,0.031970546,0.00064413337,2.2670422e-7,7.053569e-7,0.0000031841714,0.00009272431],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993153,0.000028397828,0.00033786535,0.000040864874,0.0002159482,0.00006159152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912965,0.00002098557,0.00062426494,0.000042873937,0.00017617823,0.0000060580705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043019612,0.000059721297,0.0001833861,0.000041101466,0.00009810843,0.000028064174,0.00009179261,0.000025760892,0.000007538609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045916237,0.000028484907,0.000066711196,0.0000705835,0.00012606259,0.00020000589,0.000022137816,0.000082626306,5.646961e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037476584,0.000034151228,0.00009254558,0.00025856885,0.000019347284,3.7786884e-7,0.000117243515,9.1200053e-7,0.0005494736,0.9968511,0.00039894713,0.0016398435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063635283,0.0013616402,0.18236195,0.02422702,0.0008026658,0.00006191855,0.00064526976,0.0002216902,0.0072984397,0.23669769,0.53928936,0.0006688146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007944231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000054913344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7601534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009229997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034664383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12009353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W66244103","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1196","title":"Multi-disciplinary Practice in a Community Law Environment: Clinical Legal Education Combined with Holistic Service Provision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Leasehold estate; Service (business); Bankruptcy; Legal education; Service-learning; Practice of law; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Legal research; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Political science; Legal profession; Engineering; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.09218450673027834,"score_gpt":0.473167992219119,"score_spread":0.38098348548884065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W66244103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49153644,0.000046428475,0.00018546621,0.34551874,0.00053431705,0.00036073723,0.0000049909645,0.000018531096,0.16179436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807613,0.000051066727,0.0018197307,0.015839405,0.0012331608,0.0000041122066,0.0000045490997,0.000008216858,0.0002784567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719274,0.001828865,0.00045859662,0.000079301884,0.00028347247,0.00015699913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980634,0.0008182638,0.0005903436,0.00009696556,0.00031343297,0.0001175846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028955059,0.000082545965,0.00019611247,0.00008612466,0.0011969489,0.0002096016,0.00017447033,0.000117114396,0.000013722767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010188932,0.000071345625,0.000037741407,0.00026277106,0.000396124,0.0014643553,0.00004067325,0.00096230744,0.00000709076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021967888,0.0016652133,0.00028722658,0.00002080192,0.000018775498,0.0000012465193,0.067302555,0.0000031058462,0.000016278897,0.92666036,0.00030747536,0.003497296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019437622,0.00063163857,0.022181233,0.00006931392,0.000079471,0.000026180003,0.05189638,0.00003616333,0.000002298661,0.011633035,0.9113078,0.00019268206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0698882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015632756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9150273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013311315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014328639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9363055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6937113590","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1487","title":"Front Matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Front and back ends","score_opus":0.014619243354985944,"score_gpt":0.3305413281220649,"score_spread":0.31592208476707895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6937113590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41771045,0.00024150871,0.00004390002,0.030283837,0.0002655747,0.00005533544,0.000022990655,0.000013385199,0.551363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827879,0.0000076200467,0.000079224556,0.011258603,0.0017768934,3.3885814e-7,2.9395557e-7,0.000012587941,0.004076558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993952,0.00005513272,0.00023295166,0.000043217085,0.0001294494,0.00014407255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966604,0.000016670612,0.00014888633,0.00003739712,0.000084463936,0.00004655456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020473098,0.00006475531,0.00019346828,0.00012933658,0.00015520456,0.000056208242,0.0000854945,0.00005794447,0.00015399249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014661038,0.00005351201,0.000098566634,0.00006692432,0.000111253445,0.00012648694,0.000030573286,0.0001582771,0.00039604487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013101418,0.00009236112,0.002228179,0.000035774163,0.00019706938,0.000018642228,0.0047667795,6.916882e-7,0.0026035532,0.58080417,0.4075597,0.0015620533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017717003,0.000063764026,0.07479671,0.000056267778,0.000112938695,0.000052067684,0.00044921174,0.0000029804514,0.00041541486,0.07775099,0.84436804,0.00015994656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006944307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000055380726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5650774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009363236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014333312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50904876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W780636785","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1042","title":"An Analysis of the Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2001","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.1219575368469726,"score_gpt":0.38046370754355424,"score_spread":0.25850617069658166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W780636785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745138,0.00005817464,0.0000025773431,0.014110874,0.000039880204,0.000038215127,0.000005472348,0.0000017879136,0.011229165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971918,0.00008655739,0.00006193644,0.0016651207,0.00055987184,5.901617e-7,4.5747115e-7,0.0000028946272,0.0004307951],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994914,0.000037964583,0.00017772912,0.00004091594,0.00016104833,0.000090973284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995707,0.0000356309,0.00013784034,0.00007164979,0.0001287829,0.0000553561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012906198,0.000045804463,0.0002546019,0.00006853316,0.0001402854,0.000009081175,0.00004629171,0.00002960597,0.00005466683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028453504,0.000025030844,0.000104509025,0.00019503178,0.00026777468,0.000066595494,0.000009066747,0.00009423043,2.3567375e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014992291,0.00063302997,0.7231173,0.00009899511,0.00238189,0.0000030146002,0.1922858,0.000008991069,0.00002128888,0.07451206,0.003039883,0.0037478176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008295518,0.00064251205,0.9002215,0.000038370996,0.0027393983,0.000043552896,0.08135785,0.000038628954,0.000028149592,0.0006890185,0.013276651,0.000094782525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00596848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011265384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17710423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054806114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008921153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9022596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W825083229","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1030","title":"Human Dignity and Ecnomic Integrity for Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary on the Supreme Court's Decisions in Granovsky and Martin","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.056901249944821375,"score_gpt":0.35657258113704027,"score_spread":0.2996713311922189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W825083229","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9214747,0.000059692768,0.000010322812,0.075916186,0.000027360724,0.00019465394,0.000020992176,0.0000035174621,0.0022925802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965914,0.000047846457,0.000021602902,0.002550289,0.00075363374,0.000004819887,3.8194852e-7,0.0000054707484,0.000024552779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992357,0.000116333926,0.00021443669,0.000083124294,0.0001721315,0.00017830983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993783,0.00031906247,0.00012320784,0.000032910655,0.000061144965,0.00008536417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008468929,0.0000803253,0.00021397664,0.000043724016,0.0012400317,0.00013653575,0.00008527084,0.00006461347,0.000002905986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020006129,0.000049687158,0.0000437723,0.00007597425,0.00079322886,0.00019556127,0.000021457266,0.00022724175,9.931638e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016275549,0.00017385343,0.006441268,0.000032821183,0.00004197189,0.0000028444845,0.1598054,0.0000011217104,0.000051169958,0.8307425,0.0017323369,0.0008119654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050366386,0.0013826855,0.030612705,0.0005048724,0.00009972415,0.000018979412,0.2537164,0.0000032755095,0.000047893696,0.66590303,0.04226726,0.000406541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07558373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07071305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16483948,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012481383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017119416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9537446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W869676181","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1065","title":"\"Simple Logic\": Race, the Identity Documents Rule and the Story of a Nation Besieged and Betrayed","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Race (biology); Identity (music); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02024586816195284,"score_gpt":0.33914438706473893,"score_spread":0.3188985189027861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W869676181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8895195,0.00061653106,0.000025540907,0.02174213,0.000065606466,0.00011332698,0.00002000351,0.000003710674,0.08789363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99592215,0.00076556724,0.00002350828,0.0019182764,0.0007739038,7.3998916e-7,4.281882e-7,0.0000020535224,0.0005933896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989893,0.00039915758,0.00017756988,0.000044476015,0.00026850068,0.00012103198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938977,0.00025218198,0.00018035954,0.000029560562,0.000093318966,0.000054813398],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011859766,0.000050860646,0.0001594757,0.000024910963,0.0012938946,0.000070405404,0.000096711796,0.000046852445,0.0000357164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001130871,0.000030548166,0.000051804098,0.00007750239,0.0026965842,0.00026343676,0.00001766658,0.00015359349,4.783495e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036595797,0.000012086258,0.00026210962,0.0000037366829,0.000028156715,5.800545e-7,0.008033078,4.0547673e-7,0.0000098652545,0.98962957,0.00028582528,0.0016979657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021572453,0.00009839703,0.026680756,0.000017118624,0.00014439775,0.000023061979,0.008376402,0.0000035272046,0.000011029923,0.36495838,0.5973875,0.00014216827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011632188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008621892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6246712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035805602,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034564573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99517214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W942236077","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1211","title":"Do Us Proud: Poor Women Claiming Adjudicative Space at CESR","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Human rights; Poverty; Political science; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Gender studies; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09412649945809393,"score_gpt":0.45390141530058664,"score_spread":0.3597749158424927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W942236077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9463585,0.0003066981,0.000005921925,0.0067806467,0.00028737646,0.0001555198,0.00001277246,0.0000146949105,0.046077844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99196786,0.00012697408,0.00006641534,0.0014915522,0.004904656,0.000012414834,0.0000010575776,0.000020646408,0.001408415],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981861,0.00043242832,0.00046928247,0.00010379204,0.00033748202,0.00047087457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984737,0.00011345373,0.000607362,0.000062635736,0.00038347533,0.00035938396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009864534,0.00012611483,0.000569061,0.00008683338,0.0010921353,0.000026998156,0.00013699564,0.00023271408,0.000062788386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014709782,0.0001002106,0.000080174206,0.00013597176,0.00018536205,0.00020078603,0.000117874224,0.00049746333,0.000032923326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002283493,0.00007552068,0.011126956,0.000112246395,0.0001020223,0.000021671516,0.753391,3.9643962e-7,0.000091133144,0.23002332,0.0023676555,0.0024597147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036425649,0.00042292802,0.018640215,0.00018776402,0.000060076633,0.000004326353,0.47811761,0.0000033203578,0.000059037855,0.040065076,0.4584477,0.00034938063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034554668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011207241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45608005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00068412104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069106865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83999324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9525550","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1059","title":"The Ontario Tenant Protection Act: A Trust Betrayed","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.055566843752669084,"score_gpt":0.3433718898515991,"score_spread":0.28780504609893004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9525550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7981616,0.0001046705,0.000031265492,0.1207629,0.00038299564,0.00016589588,8.7787964e-7,0.000013140583,0.080376655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918532,0.00027321622,0.00001593087,0.00060924696,0.0028459053,0.0000016719785,6.646743e-8,0.0000040286573,0.004396762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906373,0.00010578059,0.0002168732,0.0000562093,0.00031513543,0.00024228702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995008,0.00005133507,0.00018939747,0.00003772084,0.00012516936,0.00009557138],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087856373,0.00006136929,0.0001283532,0.000032152122,0.0020178317,0.00018658912,0.00014521174,0.00007718104,0.000021580234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009970116,0.000034292378,0.000099637495,0.0001067172,0.0003670447,0.00026549236,0.000015951791,0.0002386025,0.0000030375124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041040953,0.0000847452,0.0012384834,0.000010425945,0.000059052003,0.000037100774,0.17717285,5.936269e-7,0.0002287982,0.7285743,0.001845917,0.09033734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018897977,0.00012829668,0.0071091186,0.000013879627,0.000022560102,0.000033873494,0.004204021,6.6629497e-7,0.000014643236,0.014047412,0.97417545,0.00006108508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3055324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42352408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97232956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002466377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050099596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}