{"meta":{"query_hash":"c7d9738e00d6","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy"},"cohort_total":204,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":204,"exported":204,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/c7d9738e00d6","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Law+and+Social+Policy"},"results":[{"id":"W1012836559","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1209","title":"Implementation of Housing Rights in South Africa: Approaches and Strategies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Disadvantaged; Political science; Economic growth; Jurisprudence; Fair Housing Act; Displacement (psychology); Development economics; Business; Law; Civil rights; Economics","score_opus":0.11425690676276906,"score_gpt":0.38279155091087763,"score_spread":0.26853464414810857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1012836559","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12675676,0.01750179,0.029961595,0.42868966,0.00094568403,0.0014316429,0.000051372346,0.00007169867,0.39458972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93916386,0.007801758,0.012731381,0.01362101,0.00019624691,0.0007281319,0.000022751354,0.000022422373,0.025712386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922047,0.0042013004,0.00030374463,0.0004032064,0.00085695897,0.0020300387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99404526,0.0030747554,0.0007696193,0.00037262117,0.0006209388,0.001116691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146704,0.0006787129,0.0004078895,0.0024884806,0.008608603,0.010522943,0.0023417585,0.007880311,0.0060560894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014757316,0.0004343799,0.00049413793,0.0016353817,0.02215107,0.0126028685,0.021086395,0.00554938,0.00033816087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010120818,0.00010279261,0.0012166852,0.00026304118,0.000009822425,0.00091633474,0.031140143,0.0004187436,0.0005464861,0.92166626,0.0037289124,0.039980624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008934612,0.00020829201,0.006409739,0.0036293217,0.000036617395,0.001035864,0.16058406,0.0016223354,0.0017504786,0.44282642,0.38173422,0.000073339594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010642168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0131241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011811323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026365824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08569759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1016360343","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1213","title":"Catherine Lennon's Story: Lessons from Front Line Advocacy on the Human Right to Housing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Foreclosure; State (computer science); Front line; Front (military); Health care; Health insurance; Political science; Law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.07293925911620282,"score_gpt":0.2999499824076563,"score_spread":0.2270107232914535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1016360343","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039662407,0.0054433844,0.0003388745,0.9592,0.0016226281,0.0000066540842,0.0000269574,0.000006655887,0.029388614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27691814,0.018054418,0.0009019091,0.6485397,0.004738509,0.0000696246,0.000054663727,0.00009045996,0.050632626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99385464,0.004071041,0.00012142957,0.00038039192,0.00077441445,0.00079816877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810457,0.014606751,0.0007974106,0.0004241402,0.0010867105,0.0020393871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008518304,0.0005195685,0.00065082364,0.0009385219,0.014782566,0.0133811915,0.0020025955,0.019735403,0.0067829574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022479575,0.00039713702,0.00043476457,0.0012699171,0.018901989,0.013606429,0.005738895,0.0267071,0.0010569023],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033684617,0.000054622844,0.0014510793,0.00008065384,0.000010491187,0.0012304572,0.032981567,0.00013849695,0.000063954314,0.28331327,0.6644663,0.016175494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001716546,0.00002538449,0.000903706,0.0005648553,0.0000067224305,0.0006230391,0.048256893,0.00025342536,0.00013214345,0.08820749,0.8609654,0.000043824002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032944724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062123913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032944724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062608267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005272721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06550598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1056179214","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1027","title":"A Full Range of Housing: Recent Developments in Protecting Rental Housing Stock under Municipal Planning Policies","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Urbanization and City Planning","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rental housing; Renting; Stock (firearms); Business; Subdivision; Political science; Civil engineering; Geography; Engineering; Law; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09155530369486942,"score_gpt":0.3711078416055683,"score_spread":0.2795525379106989,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1056179214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4525751,0.05019752,0.020625556,0.13116197,0.00048827476,0.00017756378,0.000595492,0.00020596059,0.3439726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95479465,0.0100264875,0.0050682356,0.0049323915,0.00021955193,0.00006655744,0.00015656604,0.000028706896,0.024706852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958974,0.00088017253,0.00017055683,0.000451933,0.0016923876,0.00090752874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618405,0.0007444877,0.0005332351,0.00063114864,0.0012197522,0.00068739965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003937752,0.00015501799,0.00023830505,0.0007438113,0.0020414179,0.0045918515,0.0018609733,0.0025648007,0.003167975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007674215,0.00032224413,0.00027420907,0.0014246358,0.0069022463,0.0030396697,0.0036008356,0.001820806,0.0002458104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015439578,0.00008490015,0.032829404,0.0010653666,0.00007282083,0.00036436642,0.016935442,0.00556235,0.0035723394,0.66062963,0.023830146,0.2548988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033833076,0.00020767277,0.15685646,0.0009903224,0.00007476918,0.00042920012,0.008784161,0.0021009892,0.0021040158,0.03557146,0.7927815,0.00006569311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34291318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64637506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34291318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012834293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021290597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6818344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1058365201","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1028","title":"The Critical Characteristics of Community Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.0912782148151113,"score_gpt":0.45576877241492225,"score_spread":0.36449055759981097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1058365201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722819,0.0009470694,0.00018841954,0.004452349,0.00006403643,0.00021998392,0.0017682099,0.000026956115,0.020051247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99558806,0.0004035634,0.00012276892,0.00035400788,0.000030264697,0.00007944774,0.0003124821,0.000008664856,0.0031007102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99475574,0.0005708384,0.00024633165,0.0003884245,0.001608513,0.002430242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98030317,0.0018918618,0.006413094,0.0003615364,0.0040450557,0.0069853016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013173819,0.00021445073,0.00030713342,0.0019889572,0.0070353937,0.0031403254,0.0015657777,0.0008020691,0.008512869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013099048,0.00042968683,0.00026498688,0.0046902047,0.0024825719,0.00068574026,0.002331341,0.00081732473,0.00033891626],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017342459,0.000113597715,0.9419775,0.00019492256,0.000045485325,0.0006512077,0.020184666,0.00030663196,0.00054022245,0.003376743,0.009876321,0.02255932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016349404,0.00005227565,0.96854335,0.0000930346,0.000012680288,0.00022716496,0.018456595,0.00020735132,0.00006590287,0.00017657712,0.012128342,0.000020426389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93350506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97771615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06649494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043505635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07224845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31565696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1059798678","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1031","title":"Book Review: Are Prisons Obsolete?, by Angela Y. Davis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.021851014991880767,"score_gpt":0.3333454912575827,"score_spread":0.311494476265702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1059798678","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000053190193,0.95276195,0.000067272435,0.019785779,0.019416085,0.000011415072,0.00012916511,0.00002859204,0.0077465083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008307062,0.9198883,0.00018494578,0.025632896,0.016082581,0.00005337355,0.00025278897,0.000038209095,0.037036102],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920017,0.00012878317,0.000074821626,0.00012618549,0.00041006127,0.0000600272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99794775,0.0008169395,0.000199207,0.00007027119,0.00071079214,0.0002549206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011442178,0.0010699114,0.0016523759,0.0022304317,0.0006977142,0.0046949172,0.0015412765,0.0027091547,0.024109956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059971623,0.00058138,0.00056770863,0.003885333,0.0012897686,0.0042565675,0.0011312255,0.005407259,0.020346425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001031101,0.0000062973163,0.000033089764,0.0009369718,0.0000070987003,0.00001767833,0.000026618312,0.000021206188,0.000028996206,0.0010697304,0.95597523,0.041866742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007654707,0.000007836674,0.00019455804,0.0013964722,0.0000067273213,0.00010819711,0.00002785144,0.000007228659,0.000010673479,0.00040257248,0.9978249,0.000005321287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009643434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016954208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024109956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028729336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045069274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08065587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1115536093","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1029","title":"A Response to \"The Critical Characteristics of Community Legal Aid Clinics in Ontario\"","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.09211197741561815,"score_gpt":0.46165063457544253,"score_spread":0.36953865715982437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1115536093","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06659186,0.0017596508,0.000090720096,0.920574,0.0018607341,0.00008513331,0.0004231654,0.000022654363,0.008592229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5104979,0.005382486,0.00031197016,0.44235554,0.0034956315,0.00035605486,0.00032336137,0.0000835568,0.037193414],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938525,0.00093188504,0.00032834822,0.0005151005,0.0022188632,0.0021533736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96720916,0.009457051,0.0054081054,0.00043106588,0.0065601543,0.010934477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004943933,0.00031705384,0.00038147933,0.00089993456,0.020071762,0.0045854896,0.002825516,0.010657613,0.0097638285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026427735,0.0008734197,0.00037037831,0.0026611052,0.0065249843,0.0021813791,0.003607017,0.0059623457,0.00049695524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017819728,0.00008348602,0.06459219,0.0007324213,0.000031715957,0.0031374167,0.11270539,0.00015277443,0.0010472606,0.0075416723,0.7837651,0.026032401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009967825,0.00013224,0.24974494,0.0010730468,0.000041420248,0.00070920616,0.18860982,0.00029127824,0.0002826162,0.0010508335,0.55777246,0.00019249119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9144695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97379994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08553052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07821842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11581991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56751704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1125468081","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1025","title":"Providing Services to Clients with Serious Mental Illness: New Challenges and Opportunities for Community Legal Clinics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Mental Health Treatment and Access","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Mental illness; Psychiatry; Legal service; Mental health; Business; Nursing; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14679265605715464,"score_gpt":0.4315217384286416,"score_spread":0.284729082371487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1125468081","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025970753,0.007574269,0.0012577564,0.94920945,0.001700574,0.000061016584,0.000112121954,0.000109632914,0.014004431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6603896,0.032062106,0.02512136,0.2414223,0.013430222,0.0009996335,0.0005671419,0.00039463304,0.025612932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877344,0.00505573,0.0004229917,0.00065994513,0.001382672,0.0047442536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89862645,0.02544052,0.0027273032,0.0015154012,0.0057324315,0.06595788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022435673,0.00070145575,0.0012521418,0.0016831333,0.02594869,0.018097455,0.007970323,0.024146045,0.056282368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022670884,0.0013895466,0.0016523178,0.0018452202,0.012666476,0.021567617,0.016552486,0.017929522,0.0026181557],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004962692,0.0036840858,0.028472027,0.0016071749,0.00009148533,0.0055089514,0.0305223,0.00097512855,0.0015705114,0.09132996,0.5485068,0.28723532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007874706,0.00097403093,0.039220057,0.0058357283,0.00013663611,0.007839537,0.2590517,0.0038466088,0.00048340455,0.18336529,0.4979442,0.00051527825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031765487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17021613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056282368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01195427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07738439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18828326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1270244821","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1016","title":"Book Review: Self-Employed Workers Organize: Law, Policy and Unions, by Cynthia J. Cranford, Judy Fudge, Eric Tucker, and Leah F. Vosko","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.009932197139404048,"score_gpt":0.31528524703428545,"score_spread":0.30535304989488143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1270244821","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010298031,0.79867613,0.00016627162,0.07655983,0.11082251,0.000044874352,0.00028499527,0.00004312501,0.013299257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013600274,0.747526,0.0003196011,0.051681876,0.09606705,0.00012593169,0.00051395514,0.00007128011,0.102334306],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869907,0.00025252352,0.00010390333,0.00014602637,0.0007114908,0.000086992666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912548,0.0039680786,0.00056417426,0.000123085,0.0034946261,0.00059526344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017142196,0.0015202768,0.0023965677,0.003894238,0.0011619217,0.004099947,0.0029566023,0.005107716,0.028514536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009771355,0.0007934886,0.00080156483,0.006462883,0.0015108731,0.0033690615,0.0012801576,0.0051529994,0.022954153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005207186,0.0000036162944,0.00002010167,0.00026160415,0.0000035576563,0.0000069947364,0.000007210238,0.000014432823,0.000008933914,0.00022545236,0.9901433,0.009299609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001757296,0.00001320329,0.00039854803,0.0015673346,0.000013961968,0.00011407023,0.000035740555,0.000027975153,0.000022198928,0.0005914622,0.9971878,0.000010069711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014759479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03932111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028514536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036230846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00548655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09539062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W134984923","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1197","title":"Transformative Social Work in the Criminal Justice Field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Transformative learning; Conviction; Criminal justice; Work (physics); Criminology; Field (mathematics); Sociology; Social work; Political science; Law; Social justice; Public relations; Pedagogy; Engineering","score_opus":0.07027117737201392,"score_gpt":0.4345513415156712,"score_spread":0.36428016414365727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W134984923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20209616,0.0074241785,0.014802997,0.22911833,0.0030278764,0.0005490692,0.000040169303,0.00017347075,0.5427677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466223,0.0021490187,0.0034693927,0.013434046,0.00045639765,0.00016856095,0.000031567088,0.00006797435,0.033600856],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98851365,0.0070114587,0.0001566316,0.0004089506,0.001296305,0.0026129305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99355775,0.0026205906,0.0006456543,0.00036529126,0.0006454812,0.0021651967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008204539,0.00053046783,0.0003827636,0.0033735875,0.03160061,0.009716227,0.002230475,0.0049011176,0.0056319153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062192767,0.00034026644,0.0007035899,0.0019329756,0.07325005,0.005044799,0.014474785,0.007485213,0.00059168553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001641093,0.00025805942,0.0022340415,0.00012594949,0.000007148813,0.0016392841,0.6255596,0.00024135494,0.00055108883,0.30404037,0.021178083,0.044148684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015676236,0.00009849474,0.004442551,0.00048509624,0.0000072012235,0.0016816799,0.60721385,0.00037888912,0.00040348002,0.08087801,0.30434784,0.000047301764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033608943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07413676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033608943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015505765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03057433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112502694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W157926775","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1062","title":"New Brunswick (Minister of Health and Community Services) v. G.(J.): En Route to More Equitable Access to the Legal System","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.03671431630726523,"score_gpt":0.37204518587448204,"score_spread":0.3353308695672168,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W157926775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030217282,0.0073193526,0.001615274,0.33634204,0.002887727,0.0005557755,0.0010991753,0.0001498428,0.6198135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23553166,0.0053852997,0.005016792,0.32864884,0.00044447032,0.00046604197,0.00046272558,0.000115779614,0.4239284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931335,0.0009536598,0.0002902802,0.000589163,0.0020602914,0.0029731467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942887,0.0014358353,0.00034335876,0.0003199786,0.0021084016,0.001503706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060754344,0.00049939106,0.0004173506,0.0008962102,0.0128896525,0.0074820677,0.002857254,0.011956753,0.011961785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010827147,0.0008428218,0.00076970836,0.0015978545,0.0048115375,0.002985918,0.0032390405,0.011769781,0.0011765694],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076264274,0.000070289236,0.008623726,0.00021315497,0.00002772338,0.0011091192,0.0080662975,0.0002495216,0.0016199738,0.6545771,0.30600876,0.019358061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014212103,0.0000719565,0.019575797,0.00062464114,0.00006462817,0.0002696253,0.005782865,0.00030482814,0.0011294336,0.019638747,0.95227027,0.00012499151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9478001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98887783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05668579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05668579,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20507148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41128612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1596681594","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1191","title":"Conceptualizing Reflective Practice for Legal Professionals","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Reflective practice; Conceptualization; Rigour; Engineering ethics; Legal practice; Context (archaeology); Action (physics); Reflection (computer programming); Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Law; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.08073064703695744,"score_gpt":0.5121997335205556,"score_spread":0.43146908648359816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1596681594","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026677523,0.02021385,0.49949077,0.12094451,0.0019985144,0.0011242299,0.000054431614,0.00041469283,0.3290815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6988169,0.01018563,0.26494724,0.008191908,0.0006803147,0.0022792872,0.00009555729,0.0002017282,0.014601346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.89547765,0.08699592,0.0034582291,0.003790759,0.007428727,0.002848791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9324869,0.05066079,0.003767483,0.005532209,0.004860323,0.0026923572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059711862,0.0013388819,0.00093551684,0.007464991,0.009980988,0.026484394,0.0053270184,0.011431588,0.0033319152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056259077,0.00088859117,0.001336283,0.0044823317,0.08865191,0.033065747,0.013154434,0.010148167,0.0009642903],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037630182,0.000020955631,0.00016770413,0.00013952692,0.0000055007577,0.00011881868,0.06545611,0.0003648151,0.000071737355,0.9259084,0.0011181827,0.006624612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021609556,0.000038440292,0.00017233694,0.0011695705,0.00000949171,0.00040597658,0.045408394,0.0014200561,0.00017378667,0.8148498,0.13629761,0.000032878972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00501466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025601035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059711862,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015968403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0221503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3157903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W165177754","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1193","title":"Law Student, Heal Thyself: The Role and Responsibility of Clinical Education Programs in Promoting Self-Care","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal education; Context (archaeology); Legal profession; Mental health; Psychology; Addiction; Political science; Medical education; Nursing; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07293553762130897,"score_gpt":0.4943147035579832,"score_spread":0.42137916593667424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W165177754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3039433,0.008142045,0.0048284414,0.57522976,0.0024311456,0.00037870812,0.00002691659,0.0001693316,0.10485029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9610908,0.003898995,0.0048006005,0.021536337,0.0005607487,0.00022182406,0.000018668587,0.000031440166,0.007840588],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98880297,0.008199387,0.00016977327,0.00031325527,0.0011796486,0.0013349259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95030636,0.012176936,0.0023821546,0.0009974169,0.0033831226,0.030753972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014409561,0.00018790257,0.00027967957,0.00078125554,0.0064320113,0.007411537,0.0013451902,0.0031116784,0.007879305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035661213,0.00025146978,0.00020769982,0.00036956955,0.0044097784,0.0040301457,0.0073971017,0.0054771677,0.0008141797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105877385,0.004810399,0.0686729,0.00057566323,0.000036545815,0.0008801849,0.05236624,0.00019691305,0.0007712391,0.024208216,0.0650213,0.7823546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003466425,0.0031403766,0.19981776,0.008430806,0.00010241194,0.0044582444,0.30987638,0.002845111,0.0022276442,0.06168557,0.40679282,0.0002762144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035834138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011526797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014409561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023652867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026500925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07620591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1696780779","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1190","title":"Framing Supervisory Relationships in Clinical Law: The Role of Critical Pedagogy","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Political science; Law; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.15555622381080705,"score_gpt":0.4989572005660606,"score_spread":0.3434009767552535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1696780779","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1802982,0.013702095,0.13928987,0.35504824,0.0039687664,0.0008115714,0.000019524883,0.00032439656,0.30653733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97149163,0.0026364368,0.013581598,0.005212561,0.0006855413,0.00031234528,0.000008334189,0.00005905073,0.0060125915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9538463,0.04029136,0.00047783952,0.0013871532,0.0018599211,0.0021374281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9313432,0.052587062,0.0035608537,0.0019065182,0.0022881592,0.008314204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033232413,0.00062746427,0.00051947095,0.0031249404,0.017456515,0.017743811,0.002930334,0.0058803717,0.0043773423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053252492,0.00060376286,0.00041665017,0.0011815706,0.06927093,0.015236267,0.018129015,0.013136174,0.0004948463],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023758095,0.00023831219,0.0020429124,0.00024130724,0.000007694133,0.000523308,0.4829774,0.00037896165,0.00027640088,0.460706,0.0062542246,0.04632983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073868134,0.0002194899,0.002409323,0.0020229334,0.000013221756,0.00060576637,0.40565652,0.0012612799,0.00066775456,0.4463033,0.14070284,0.00006375932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039412715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00624154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033232413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014059205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029053152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17575186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1739854090","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1195","title":"Pushing the Boundaries of Clinical Law: Exploring How Student and Community Legal Clinics Engage with International Human Rights Practice","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Compliance (psychology); Political science; International human rights law; Law; International law; Government (linguistics); International community; Legal research; Public relations; Psychology","score_opus":0.2086279458538344,"score_gpt":0.5176745390674697,"score_spread":0.30904659321363537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1739854090","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79562557,0.0016976539,0.008241059,0.12012905,0.0008593738,0.0005125327,0.00006568302,0.0001918358,0.072677284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726848,0.0008507743,0.0031182072,0.014313091,0.0001681886,0.00032259812,0.000037509846,0.000108109205,0.008396877],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9173817,0.06897714,0.00076873845,0.0023159252,0.0031960164,0.0073605143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8922678,0.06949786,0.005696811,0.003058011,0.00414206,0.02533753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03621566,0.00075236853,0.0008409691,0.002797171,0.044101227,0.030024651,0.007217499,0.011311152,0.018322239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08757508,0.0015083431,0.0008000714,0.001922246,0.042996462,0.021543248,0.031510014,0.01983532,0.0022892142],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027016913,0.000354995,0.002850885,0.000071166505,0.000008619655,0.0007606606,0.9723489,0.00004529507,0.00018478157,0.0066321455,0.0050735157,0.011641893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017664019,0.000073789844,0.0007602872,0.00017647022,0.0000051580782,0.00033510302,0.97390723,0.00015624885,0.0000791057,0.0038261353,0.020638254,0.000024578852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009187871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028636942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044101227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010643213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029015178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19152904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177593734","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1060","title":"Peering into the Bedrooms of the Province: An Examination of the Different Definitions of Spouse in the Family Law Act and the Ontario Works Act, 1997","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Peering; Spouse; Law; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.035919147945312375,"score_gpt":0.30085398466448343,"score_spread":0.26493483671917106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W177593734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69046694,0.005019446,0.00096286356,0.020106848,0.00014489841,0.00014844465,0.00019212822,0.000014408959,0.28294408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98571855,0.0012738437,0.00012756287,0.00048064595,0.000015291604,0.00004224734,0.00002696979,0.000008921642,0.0123059675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915433,0.0029652005,0.00032901394,0.00037026673,0.0029879468,0.0018042659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927411,0.0028311913,0.0012509397,0.00028831742,0.0018571559,0.0010313243],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004673868,0.00019431372,0.00028880572,0.0018877354,0.018463166,0.0062005017,0.0017845843,0.0014468555,0.004144775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0144724175,0.00037463827,0.00016722296,0.003558028,0.020838657,0.0032995215,0.0056270496,0.0015370906,0.00018823556],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027082928,0.000020239308,0.02160851,0.000115808274,0.000005877551,0.0005024099,0.8362092,0.00008572802,0.000153043,0.12190627,0.004887918,0.014477996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006908213,0.000016550874,0.072622515,0.0003084741,0.0000089199475,0.00009928289,0.81286067,0.000090457,0.00010643498,0.0018131628,0.112045646,0.000020988813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95281446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0760121,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0760121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07426021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5515089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1777531247","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1026","title":"The Role of PLEI in Poverty Law Services","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019771404257513458,"score_gpt":0.3744577847136049,"score_spread":0.35468638045609147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1777531247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22956933,0.0031433087,0.0042523122,0.4216036,0.0006010454,0.0001939585,0.0001222559,0.00009852933,0.3404157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9708681,0.0007414475,0.00072183844,0.015152939,0.00024265115,0.000106142696,0.000016347623,0.00003800429,0.012112506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96536446,0.021051567,0.00053689274,0.0010242119,0.0029954459,0.009027417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9059742,0.05110651,0.005030624,0.0021334395,0.00545282,0.030302323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024768207,0.00022544169,0.0004935403,0.0028431383,0.018985761,0.016840523,0.0028389615,0.008305361,0.032888554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07920118,0.00066916744,0.00053098757,0.002440405,0.021819763,0.011328682,0.018091587,0.009213649,0.0012112758],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012875306,0.00087996735,0.03184325,0.00017337831,0.00002913811,0.00050615054,0.03730578,0.00075156806,0.00017124403,0.785051,0.035259202,0.107900575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022724087,0.00050407014,0.06532869,0.0021755828,0.00008632691,0.0008329612,0.08577388,0.0042688544,0.0005878913,0.54925716,0.29083037,0.00012699184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05435279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07797836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05435279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023627091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07483647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17142731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1916555074","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1024","title":"Child Welfare Reform: Protecting Children or Policing the Poor","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare reform; Welfare; Criminology; Political science; Business; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.019937664605730133,"score_gpt":0.30695125472935064,"score_spread":0.2870135901236205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1916555074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41168782,0.016882896,0.002981831,0.22904088,0.00066982006,0.0002005742,0.0002961472,0.000045477726,0.3381945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9602383,0.007577449,0.00049970346,0.008735618,0.0002395211,0.00009162341,0.000042801643,0.000011955639,0.022563133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952987,0.0020948488,0.000072121635,0.00016075463,0.00039194227,0.0019817522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970835,0.0010598244,0.0008865346,0.0001652148,0.00032068373,0.00048416352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025178683,0.0002173713,0.00030477362,0.0011009297,0.0043634363,0.0033763894,0.0005708408,0.0017467487,0.0062641026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009264503,0.00011804723,0.00026469197,0.0015505857,0.0071557146,0.0028536075,0.004145919,0.0018474698,0.00036720058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012305165,0.00014898086,0.036783285,0.00047273107,0.000034305256,0.0007120831,0.061765585,0.0016499478,0.00028795394,0.78063494,0.026146945,0.09124022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010916729,0.0002949862,0.102875076,0.003733569,0.00006993112,0.00045292664,0.15606047,0.0012370044,0.00086072553,0.100770645,0.63347834,0.000057137335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0636241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075838864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0636241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009391211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015181461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12650752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1941609635","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1000","title":"Don't Get Enough Credit: The Need for an Impartial Consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Ontario","keywords":"Appeal; Tribunal; Liability; Business; Credit history; Law; Law and economics; Accounting; Political science; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.04621000422786614,"score_gpt":0.36957719301974,"score_spread":0.32336718879187387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1941609635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09134877,0.007921185,0.0013956891,0.6832151,0.002060927,0.00030589828,0.00033477135,0.00011991105,0.21329778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5672601,0.008785786,0.003014333,0.15017757,0.0013018311,0.00025212357,0.00022213372,0.00017806925,0.26880813],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98863214,0.0009536549,0.0004887821,0.00066834147,0.0049626105,0.004294548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970565,0.009177423,0.0019486527,0.00070778106,0.010405415,0.0071957107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006790029,0.00022730524,0.00045414772,0.001098371,0.041141573,0.012270651,0.0031398928,0.012247001,0.01072258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027779818,0.0009315273,0.00063743297,0.0023841998,0.012249135,0.004128887,0.0038340746,0.010066533,0.0005869164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011086166,0.00012093387,0.026549682,0.0005386017,0.000043508426,0.0038468367,0.05260418,0.00048130698,0.0015760602,0.32776487,0.5273154,0.05904776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005632393,0.000037020447,0.0358669,0.0004020103,0.000044964443,0.00027318115,0.023728259,0.00047679504,0.00041302264,0.0073480858,0.93123925,0.00011422953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9891733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99714726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13834116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13834116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31919506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200544033","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1066","title":"Baker v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) and the Rights of Children","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"International Human Rights and Reproductive Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.010252196057437329,"score_gpt":0.272799447896492,"score_spread":0.2625472518390547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200544033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032184582,0.014473508,0.00087547814,0.14112583,0.0012170476,0.00019632524,0.0038735978,0.00016723372,0.80588645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31315267,0.0054792054,0.001739536,0.19596721,0.00039121739,0.00024680054,0.0006290258,0.00010037276,0.48229387],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603313,0.0002789235,0.000060258935,0.0001391565,0.0014872429,0.0020012124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971022,0.0007906709,0.00020482438,0.000070078124,0.0010520138,0.00078020117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015833443,0.0005057906,0.000399444,0.0011256535,0.019574093,0.0054831505,0.0020939838,0.013002101,0.012013823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063844174,0.00060473126,0.0004922025,0.002028024,0.004291986,0.0015393492,0.001459959,0.006367539,0.001631009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004532292,0.000044952976,0.007983718,0.00009038166,0.000015807122,0.0008266206,0.0050090575,0.00018067154,0.00036376982,0.24527374,0.73084015,0.009325895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049011887,0.000032548105,0.030890318,0.00041952348,0.00005655266,0.00021223888,0.004829087,0.00025859725,0.00094659894,0.0119268205,0.95026547,0.00011334649],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97947866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034083277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034083277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07140584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24729264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122832781","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1053","title":"Disability, Poverty, and the Income Tax: The Case for Refundable Credits","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Tax credit; Earned income tax credit; Public economics; Tax reform; Tax avoidance; Government (linguistics); Tax policy; Income tax; Poverty; Business; Direct tax; Work (physics); Indirect tax; State income tax; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.03311607088496121,"score_gpt":0.34014681382515677,"score_spread":0.30703074294019556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122832781","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20550601,0.019258156,0.0014546779,0.54153645,0.00038641173,0.000026569352,0.00022282268,0.000017208125,0.23159164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743319,0.008658256,0.00019800838,0.0068245567,0.00038692553,0.000016717884,0.000021998667,0.000011302655,0.009550365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987017,0.0005107038,0.000021700656,0.00006957932,0.00017025236,0.0005261129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944583,0.003697393,0.0005002751,0.00015914175,0.0004719146,0.0007129056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022440155,0.00021391653,0.00036486736,0.0015045424,0.0048478683,0.006260812,0.00083457876,0.005462592,0.009543971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008574498,0.00016227667,0.00036170366,0.0019271886,0.00897328,0.005264829,0.00362188,0.004756875,0.0003236913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000384693,0.000094145624,0.011780702,0.000046819343,0.000010386675,0.000523816,0.0062939744,0.0005629598,0.000026274243,0.9434833,0.023837684,0.013301553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006079138,0.00004459174,0.0252272,0.00076573895,0.000047749978,0.00079242646,0.044525802,0.0021029806,0.00019147409,0.69665176,0.22952758,0.00006187066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029596802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0461562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029596802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045158165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047082226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058849037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2173654816","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1033","title":"Fair Hearings in an Ocean Port World - A Textured Concept","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Maritime and Coastal Archaeology","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Port (circuit theory); Political science; Engineering; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.025969928278584197,"score_gpt":0.274844033713249,"score_spread":0.24887410543466482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2173654816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16559635,0.002029573,0.0065321517,0.15798447,0.0021686458,0.00010965962,0.00009668018,0.00009546847,0.6653871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94806284,0.0003387985,0.0005640837,0.00582438,0.00042677694,0.000034452536,0.000010708358,0.00003460751,0.044703305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446,0.0023564962,0.00017668142,0.00046837065,0.0009184886,0.0016200349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99251187,0.0033775338,0.0004883283,0.000553359,0.0006850663,0.0023838733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0087056095,0.00033159525,0.00029395014,0.0017765708,0.01926139,0.023344105,0.0019675142,0.008542226,0.0149907265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018927956,0.00041271193,0.00032787674,0.001381501,0.039743416,0.013224627,0.009235342,0.010152661,0.0003910916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002992936,0.000046165085,0.0012741358,0.000017274075,0.0000052085966,0.00034846689,0.033528574,0.00013556541,0.00010494112,0.9459193,0.010836498,0.0077540143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036983078,0.00007909891,0.0076927952,0.0003680022,0.000031633484,0.00048550605,0.24439226,0.0006194817,0.0003755611,0.36498854,0.3808282,0.000101991114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029950028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046493266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029950028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005136113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00948388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059551418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181630519","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1046","title":"Re-Constructing the Work of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal: First Steps to a Fairer Process","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Process (computing); Rental housing; Renting; Work (physics); Business; Political science; Sociology; Process management; Computer science; Law; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Programming language","score_opus":0.06177985682178997,"score_gpt":0.3334350345422878,"score_spread":0.2716551777204978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181630519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14794399,0.010275813,0.031613547,0.15727782,0.0021131905,0.00095813634,0.00031378603,0.00023865461,0.64926505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77433807,0.0035062684,0.014394816,0.004515737,0.00021542213,0.00020628342,0.0001192905,0.00019268373,0.20251136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99358106,0.0023126677,0.0001970189,0.0006035141,0.0019347419,0.001370997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99389946,0.0015318152,0.00030789108,0.000648878,0.0025141167,0.0010978132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008662385,0.00047886657,0.00036844175,0.0019060042,0.02863869,0.013279942,0.0030472353,0.003687266,0.011027878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014492863,0.0005339205,0.00038448483,0.001955331,0.029198121,0.0055748187,0.007519205,0.003631034,0.0012007075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003376712,0.00003389999,0.0044299983,0.00019402812,0.000009573802,0.0009696805,0.3586024,0.00064425275,0.0008710465,0.5085931,0.062401082,0.0632172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000741441,0.000016158921,0.0055841086,0.00034895836,0.000010308978,0.000105667474,0.18596856,0.0003690156,0.00032099054,0.017087223,0.790143,0.000038617785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90447336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.966212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11147187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11147187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15567516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8087888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2181653631","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1045","title":"Babies as Bargaining Chips - In Defence of Birthright Citizenship in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Political science; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.026027322780194845,"score_gpt":0.25358817028766445,"score_spread":0.2275608475074696,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2181653631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5314394,0.002104767,0.0009221003,0.02058831,0.00017041272,0.000037752605,0.00013410373,0.000026520458,0.4445765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578891,0.00043244564,0.00010955157,0.0008335568,0.000008859949,0.000006567486,0.000018097337,0.000012188404,0.04068959],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812144,0.00025797042,0.000022240425,0.00014651704,0.00046413208,0.0009876566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980331,0.00048629413,0.00016310389,0.000098492965,0.00046600873,0.0007529134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014332858,0.00022549006,0.00032727746,0.0008610459,0.017381055,0.0068815486,0.0014010345,0.0015984069,0.010125737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044321786,0.000208239,0.00018215441,0.001382719,0.013904589,0.001088683,0.0039316537,0.0028084833,0.00030099892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000759791,0.000017535342,0.016787764,0.00004524967,0.00001274427,0.00088821026,0.10199131,0.00051598425,0.00038466696,0.8392767,0.0128264455,0.027177392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004614856,0.00004882229,0.06934146,0.00048124674,0.00006687455,0.00036052376,0.32788235,0.0019736413,0.0011573274,0.071746394,0.52677745,0.0001177116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96643406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98279554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07092921,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07092921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075086445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51462984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185652314","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1056","title":"The Ontario Human Rights Code and the Right to Accommodation in the Workplace for Employees with Disabilities","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Reasonable accommodation; Human rights; Code (set theory); Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Business; Law; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.05474742949953681,"score_gpt":0.37999667982010105,"score_spread":0.32524925032056423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185652314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07515089,0.004585633,0.00080281176,0.16122465,0.0008064933,0.00018124659,0.00091762136,0.000037571415,0.7562931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69329566,0.0033669658,0.0015126361,0.035828263,0.0005027521,0.0002488051,0.00027374542,0.00005979209,0.2649113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890687,0.0013797899,0.00044491084,0.00042634772,0.0038511027,0.0048292964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888026,0.0032400303,0.00076603575,0.0006605102,0.003359321,0.0031714104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004048295,0.00032242114,0.000423109,0.0018578547,0.020491924,0.006942138,0.0020713431,0.012384087,0.0135822585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01733282,0.0006963982,0.00055864046,0.0018764,0.015007746,0.002599469,0.0047778725,0.004846888,0.0009875007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011077721,0.00009763932,0.013925145,0.00012713757,0.000020225,0.00058803236,0.02313661,0.0005184391,0.0006616163,0.8041825,0.13722847,0.019403452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012111997,0.000053936747,0.07816627,0.0008520648,0.000052763484,0.00023771697,0.024581645,0.0006536622,0.00038576443,0.06542607,0.829231,0.00023799871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9791997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99365604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06859147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06859147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19608727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49766827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185925100","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1040","title":"Book Review: Disorderly People: Law and the Politics of Exlusion in Ontario, eds., Joe Hermer and Janet Mosher","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01031553704967533,"score_gpt":0.28697485036962983,"score_spread":0.2766593133199545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185925100","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018672989,0.9401808,0.00006620437,0.033913612,0.0130547965,0.000018624109,0.00025026023,0.000013571635,0.012315409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025826008,0.9268977,0.00011404557,0.010409336,0.010384419,0.000040038798,0.00029194303,0.000026594935,0.049253363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990896,0.00011752341,0.00005516559,0.000073267176,0.00057813234,0.00008640117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958276,0.0014185655,0.00031096602,0.00006583022,0.0020386404,0.00033833872],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011585144,0.0011019832,0.0018932807,0.0033612968,0.0021445416,0.0035857214,0.0018904759,0.0037400757,0.0241639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051685306,0.0006421932,0.000531002,0.009970565,0.0024972942,0.0026727265,0.001007857,0.002431468,0.005580558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007157477,0.0000031308628,0.00010600116,0.00070623617,0.0000067527194,0.000022450431,0.00013733369,0.000032600175,0.000018317445,0.0011405038,0.98015904,0.01766052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008976525,0.000006782018,0.001446598,0.0019556005,0.00002055984,0.00013773552,0.0002933749,0.000021745902,0.000017899532,0.00079730985,0.99528164,0.000011718376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45707738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8035383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5429226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018330753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024159132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9088338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194349905","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1006","title":"Inadequacies of the Humanitarian and Compassionate Procedure for Abused Immigrant Spouses","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Psychology; Compassionate Use; Criminology; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.03082993945983471,"score_gpt":0.35133103207551697,"score_spread":0.32050109261568227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194349905","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3968404,0.009755629,0.01721042,0.23804697,0.004439551,0.00032616465,0.000033803062,0.00013572922,0.3332114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93913704,0.00324301,0.0040333094,0.024652123,0.00045620117,0.00021984274,0.000010875674,0.00004758225,0.028199892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98553,0.0108898,0.0003911324,0.0004729334,0.0013900219,0.0013260557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99048775,0.004424558,0.0009774177,0.0009628563,0.0011843583,0.0019630394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014021586,0.0002952779,0.00035692984,0.00075904786,0.013563202,0.005051251,0.0017871982,0.0040279035,0.0068096793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025213027,0.00029679688,0.00044907455,0.00059714157,0.025876211,0.003392884,0.011388709,0.0049626217,0.00083858887],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006714207,0.00019409932,0.008145736,0.000373138,0.000025073874,0.001970103,0.30961472,0.00014654985,0.0007272869,0.5067276,0.025404086,0.14660463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005117907,0.00032108804,0.009549531,0.0017765699,0.000032905355,0.0043361695,0.48925295,0.00045147608,0.00086798053,0.07722789,0.41603673,0.00009555547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0112037705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033143178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98879623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048179054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023511413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07415414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195440575","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1021","title":"Social Assistance, Overpayment Recovery, and the Rule of Law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028716771348224993,"score_gpt":0.3542771213668193,"score_spread":0.32556035001859435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195440575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52548957,0.003577234,0.0026117822,0.18502927,0.00038867036,0.00006616078,0.00019041909,0.00003094465,0.2826158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98980415,0.0004677753,0.00011372675,0.0028039513,0.00018979232,0.000020434447,0.000013000824,0.000003649453,0.006583532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99553597,0.0016487071,0.00013773932,0.0003599739,0.00042716027,0.001890498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826985,0.01214026,0.0023513017,0.00049252645,0.0008754603,0.0014420814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005764599,0.00024376753,0.00057225145,0.0013259174,0.0071958625,0.008415197,0.001216322,0.008362803,0.010190011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020986091,0.00025607136,0.0004525667,0.0016064803,0.014162517,0.0042985226,0.0040398594,0.006955982,0.00039908921],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108261265,0.00028002588,0.0061930562,0.000030337167,0.00002022734,0.00022893657,0.0024588155,0.00097383995,0.00008086879,0.9749497,0.0063359765,0.008339894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001832236,0.00015983425,0.02128868,0.00017821483,0.00007844276,0.0001732653,0.011305003,0.0025731272,0.00038727486,0.9189529,0.044659447,0.00006057842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034067623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034643475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034067623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049918196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011320145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06773865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195492885","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1047","title":"Case Commentary: Turnbull, et al. v. Famous Players","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"American Sports and Literature","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029434935793384118,"score_gpt":0.2700224357575271,"score_spread":0.24058749996414297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195492885","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00094098644,0.0011460806,0.00007145394,0.9780402,0.009159468,0.00001695897,0.000072036826,0.000021545831,0.010531199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01083167,0.00095321925,0.000088888904,0.9687998,0.0065486752,0.000053322845,0.00002944416,0.00002900227,0.012666054],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558735,0.0010355901,0.0002970982,0.0009322368,0.0011542747,0.0009934412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98695695,0.008973087,0.00051849824,0.00026855682,0.001982925,0.001299975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040169326,0.0010068667,0.0014367561,0.001572046,0.0182235,0.0076707588,0.005672901,0.08667656,0.01131002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033965025,0.0011644185,0.0013334709,0.0023725352,0.007437213,0.004521303,0.002717043,0.06462408,0.004155835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023544919,0.0000074243976,0.00020029278,0.000038124275,0.000009227202,0.0010411035,0.0006539161,0.00003939127,0.00004397629,0.0037424276,0.99274665,0.001453872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011196108,0.000037051108,0.001181902,0.0007875486,0.00010754056,0.0019878678,0.0068785083,0.00023947455,0.00044617534,0.008738123,0.97938204,0.00010175184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11338667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19451213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11338667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012393516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020520331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22545338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2195883719","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1048","title":"Book Review: Poverty Bonds, by P. W. Burman","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Income, Poverty, and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Bond; Sociology; Materials science; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03271612405104098,"score_gpt":0.34158531891384347,"score_spread":0.3088691948628025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2195883719","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006092737,0.89853543,0.00026949233,0.054782502,0.037984353,0.000015761027,0.00016215797,0.000031277534,0.008158199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013449823,0.87877053,0.00038958382,0.023931248,0.044850748,0.000049092112,0.00023056094,0.000068905785,0.050364256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995035,0.000092474205,0.000041250747,0.00008032475,0.00024755718,0.00003492382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970452,0.0012555207,0.00019600344,0.000071761606,0.0011765187,0.00025492263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012008185,0.0015705363,0.0015883974,0.0032164627,0.001034518,0.0028089213,0.0015140625,0.003509033,0.018803375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064220387,0.00084480416,0.00049813755,0.0043913317,0.0015045903,0.0044086147,0.0013488072,0.006332032,0.015023763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059670842,0.0000037012646,0.00001950942,0.0001651152,0.0000033643398,0.000006918204,0.000008849918,0.00002572374,0.000012217034,0.0009047994,0.9754498,0.023394052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007514454,0.0000061485093,0.00023503575,0.00061412953,0.0000074100135,0.000097265736,0.00002042286,0.00002375795,0.0000247502,0.0017101915,0.99724686,0.000006506034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00906828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016665837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018803375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023499103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032413972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06290358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196217095","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1039","title":"Case Comment: Mack et al. v. Attorney General of Canada - Rethinking the Contemporary Conception of Judicial Discretion and Justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial discretion; Discretion; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Sociology; Judicial review","score_opus":0.061486698478188495,"score_gpt":0.33806912484068713,"score_spread":0.27658242636249863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196217095","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06852299,0.003555246,0.000659818,0.7341576,0.00316429,0.00019812971,0.0007572733,0.000104686995,0.18887998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34955233,0.0027087836,0.00048355258,0.463751,0.0011503024,0.00015998178,0.00014885413,0.000065898275,0.18197927],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706393,0.00018319195,0.00007436421,0.00036782387,0.0007366053,0.0015740915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865663,0.0003740716,0.000120492434,0.00006398774,0.00037479505,0.00041009372],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012616742,0.0006408946,0.00034695497,0.0007945392,0.029508768,0.0043345755,0.0029138403,0.022324756,0.010668936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004663843,0.0007035523,0.0007444353,0.0017776078,0.007310854,0.0016264382,0.0022002114,0.017778516,0.0008937845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012003736,0.00005058403,0.013606031,0.0001502532,0.000036451405,0.010267145,0.026053293,0.0003526584,0.00067180087,0.15152891,0.78471565,0.0124472305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008909406,0.000041728326,0.019158902,0.0006022314,0.00010745626,0.004114626,0.035891548,0.0006118929,0.0008183652,0.014345188,0.92400354,0.00021535682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9625698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9848408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046428442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046428442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.074090585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33686352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2200182845","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1188","title":"Not So Dangerous Liaisons: A Clinical Perspective on Interdisciplinarity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Space (punctuation); Quality (philosophy); Legal education; Engineering ethics; Narrative; Value (mathematics); Sociology; Law; Political science; Epistemology; Public relations; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.10539369464726837,"score_gpt":0.5174340682983596,"score_spread":0.4120403736510912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2200182845","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015863482,0.010404618,0.014591064,0.82462686,0.0023393407,0.0001357671,0.000014802108,0.00006761558,0.13195647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80161166,0.011813632,0.009685917,0.15287015,0.0039370684,0.00037643744,0.000034240926,0.00012487765,0.01954604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95107144,0.040353224,0.000979734,0.0022662773,0.002397984,0.00293136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95008206,0.028948903,0.003215473,0.0019364128,0.0049629495,0.010854125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03510632,0.0008076987,0.0008832285,0.0028545707,0.020061146,0.023949737,0.004920694,0.022212971,0.009672947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05578144,0.00064497825,0.00067371264,0.0012988033,0.10258596,0.02115121,0.018576184,0.033232283,0.0016739921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032996995,0.00032252655,0.0013743957,0.00028916745,0.000014731957,0.0033434404,0.21166591,0.00038910878,0.00025148343,0.72217184,0.034993455,0.025150923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000724366,0.000206532,0.00051326136,0.001333162,0.00001443929,0.0049292548,0.22532281,0.00053162617,0.0002923212,0.5488208,0.21789907,0.00006425231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003405827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004873274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03510632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009256734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03273717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18566215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203974900","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1187","title":"Poverty Law, Access to Justice, and Ethical Lawyering: Celebrating 40 Years of Clinical Education at Osgoode Hall Law School","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Legal education; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.10444906302504327,"score_gpt":0.5056466276795187,"score_spread":0.4011975646544755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203974900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21906132,0.010057758,0.0002590429,0.7041682,0.0035260406,0.000067490684,0.00009840405,0.000070585025,0.06269117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7746681,0.012865464,0.0014285217,0.09857794,0.0028502478,0.00026946617,0.00017167021,0.0001354952,0.10903317],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937843,0.0023704432,0.00012235895,0.00032733462,0.0011585382,0.0022369733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813432,0.0019537315,0.0010102632,0.00022314473,0.0010684788,0.014401235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009019755,0.00037947536,0.00051479565,0.0011920382,0.017500872,0.009539186,0.0012650291,0.0054778196,0.011130344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01328751,0.00048136266,0.00030390377,0.00068849354,0.00858413,0.0057633715,0.013497667,0.013388232,0.0013235972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007548682,0.0021288523,0.016313588,0.00021349976,0.000026448806,0.0007399731,0.19403341,0.000110419554,0.0006803695,0.014265187,0.61646354,0.15494932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028324934,0.00032803506,0.051523555,0.0007182363,0.000015916754,0.0003810817,0.37632087,0.00009137527,0.00045712345,0.008506457,0.56155694,0.000072166134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016860526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16161716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017500872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008952936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025391664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064958334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2204575813","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1014","title":"The Challenge of Defining Unmet Legal Need","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business","score_opus":0.034148207418026696,"score_gpt":0.2634158331042794,"score_spread":0.2292676256862527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2204575813","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.059296742,0.023668323,0.019268792,0.58505666,0.0018298359,0.00022828515,0.0006258844,0.000082003215,0.30994347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8965717,0.017244898,0.015417931,0.04507439,0.0022247718,0.0005625037,0.00048413637,0.0001233688,0.022296242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812935,0.009192622,0.0015025204,0.0016894563,0.0041869036,0.0021350353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94047433,0.030092072,0.007431757,0.0027602296,0.013694779,0.0055468827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024139037,0.0004926261,0.0012228383,0.009720284,0.007122916,0.014415982,0.0036397302,0.006542298,0.012683847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063383356,0.0005978665,0.00058619573,0.006848634,0.024359405,0.026870979,0.013380965,0.009284306,0.0012746037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016950487,0.000039194867,0.005580546,0.0004573087,0.000014798782,0.00028979458,0.021275895,0.00042239443,0.00009023589,0.9028049,0.01921574,0.049792223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014987721,0.00006106973,0.009678439,0.003231789,0.000023119319,0.0007876424,0.07330235,0.0013287151,0.0001428265,0.6955414,0.21581103,0.00007664654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03301476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058765937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03301476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016474856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04386331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12766093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212337182","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1008","title":"Book Review: The First Women Lawyers: A Comparative Study of Gender, Law and the Legal Professions, by Mary Jane Mossman; The Ursula Franklin Reader: Pacifism as a Map, by Ursula M. Franklin","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.039906791484003924,"score_gpt":0.39661287441849274,"score_spread":0.3567060829344888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212337182","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00038939115,0.8038171,0.0002015028,0.11129584,0.04898165,0.00004385725,0.00039675133,0.000045385175,0.034828488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050847363,0.7132898,0.00037436307,0.03784953,0.037921242,0.00013587528,0.0007470084,0.00009280791,0.20450465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896777,0.00023760313,0.000064232154,0.00009102211,0.00055911345,0.00008034872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927856,0.003857804,0.00036281,0.00009072621,0.0024757818,0.000427264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009799028,0.0008585754,0.0013536563,0.004149381,0.0018163578,0.00437552,0.0016158889,0.0032892316,0.043641582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0080691865,0.0005784564,0.00043498425,0.0085812695,0.0013518822,0.004005314,0.0011879117,0.0033412296,0.015856303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031809961,0.000004264343,0.000035518657,0.00024147828,0.0000020119098,0.000010626027,0.00006651739,0.000011795323,0.000015708996,0.0004975972,0.98797417,0.011137149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005235674,0.000012207323,0.0007619474,0.0014784259,0.0000070031133,0.00009642952,0.00036580366,0.000015669837,0.000030945954,0.00059368776,0.99662423,0.000008565236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02778884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11223567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043641582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041899006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070102424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14599568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2212459771","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1051","title":"Social Welfare Entitlements and the Role of Law: Guaranteeing Equality in Denmark and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Social Welfare; Political science; Sociology; Social equality; Law","score_opus":0.02519802207930273,"score_gpt":0.34430510548822973,"score_spread":0.319107083408927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2212459771","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8652956,0.005109442,0.00082724186,0.032742064,0.00019543091,0.000099664154,0.0013408995,0.000036637935,0.094352975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98866946,0.00065595336,0.0003437807,0.0010438322,0.000015391715,0.0000220132,0.00010863337,0.0000105486715,0.009130316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9827444,0.002066431,0.00061829964,0.0009848933,0.00286976,0.010716144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98749566,0.0034639733,0.0010115328,0.0003811961,0.0033851424,0.00426252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006565422,0.00034253305,0.001204614,0.0022742145,0.01755131,0.013166225,0.003454165,0.0059985924,0.006796756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020466054,0.0007036391,0.0010987541,0.0029029509,0.0073855496,0.002869788,0.0077654948,0.004269807,0.0002505563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004664381,0.00018264132,0.0690263,0.00039105982,0.00029604448,0.0011308516,0.024716409,0.008714365,0.0005543111,0.852644,0.018473472,0.023404032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005698127,0.00024362768,0.43853033,0.001731413,0.0009729507,0.00044807934,0.10402615,0.016933499,0.0024071678,0.1362408,0.29695857,0.00093761855],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9936964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9966922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15651508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15651508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30218488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.978323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215341176","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1054","title":"Into the Wasteland: Applying Equality Principles to Medical Inadmissibility in Canadian Immigration Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04223248256360731,"score_gpt":0.37202400221443904,"score_spread":0.32979151965083175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215341176","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09483413,0.00614652,0.015589154,0.17873044,0.00068612525,0.00019114999,0.00018716288,0.000048649086,0.7035867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9600127,0.0016576119,0.0028219928,0.009510039,0.0001987224,0.00007610658,0.000030145626,0.000026743224,0.025665976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.985316,0.00393708,0.00039265884,0.0008497461,0.0035965713,0.0059079668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907699,0.0053333226,0.00051360426,0.00044294266,0.0021385783,0.00080156204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113905445,0.00048445642,0.00065324473,0.004055755,0.02439435,0.01118863,0.0028721497,0.0077632796,0.008284489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034358643,0.0006359181,0.0007489834,0.0035781614,0.050215784,0.007693554,0.008465428,0.0077899806,0.0002551959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006802857,0.000004927877,0.00070786686,0.00001630149,0.0000037242578,0.000076857265,0.004689641,0.00028345824,0.000016195345,0.98752606,0.0024478976,0.0042203343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056828354,0.00002918368,0.00909281,0.0005495786,0.000074951495,0.00011832689,0.027207647,0.0028591775,0.00025194028,0.8556761,0.104000516,0.000082969134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9263604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94879687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.096110955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.096110955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14241642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69733703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215768430","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1004","title":"A Tale of Marginalization: Comparing Workers with Disabilities in Canada and the United States","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; University of Toronto","keywords":"Political science; Economic growth; Gender studies; Demographic economics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09050568518810084,"score_gpt":0.37073970418241936,"score_spread":0.28023401899431855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215768430","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9846154,0.0021575799,0.00008422181,0.0041963602,0.00006671573,0.000039409497,0.0010220214,0.000007781481,0.007810545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978047,0.00072203006,0.00008348163,0.0004060467,0.000015431991,0.000011729466,0.00032315735,0.00000450367,0.00062887935],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757844,0.00035093864,0.00008612251,0.0001226456,0.0007750727,0.0010868167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954749,0.00034685255,0.00040132055,0.00014483352,0.0020471225,0.001584959],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019870931,0.00036182263,0.00049118546,0.004378822,0.008353017,0.0023585295,0.0017756256,0.0008552236,0.0019686401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071489797,0.00017085177,0.0007403698,0.006571387,0.0039254944,0.0014800098,0.0038418556,0.0015442123,0.00013340321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032972157,0.0001457471,0.90318227,0.00012084379,0.00017963958,0.00029250627,0.04501359,0.0003920648,0.0002627802,0.0042551137,0.008157373,0.037668303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012300054,0.000082705585,0.89138114,0.0001642568,0.00006240695,0.00010067126,0.10146138,0.00024475917,0.00009476239,0.00052614533,0.0058314507,0.00003786328],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99723524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030226178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030226178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05537507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2193073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W221584915","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1212","title":"Community Campaigns for the Right to Housing: Lessons from the R2H Coalition of Ontario","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Variety (cybernetics); Community organizing; Public administration; Political science; Work (physics); Public relations; Community organization; Affordable housing; Public housing; Sociology; Economic growth; Law; Economics; Engineering","score_opus":0.22800561846139725,"score_gpt":0.46652266542694615,"score_spread":0.2385170469655489,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W221584915","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34034497,0.004690933,0.0015666062,0.28800422,0.00072566886,0.0002599343,0.00022775725,0.000061102866,0.36411878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94649243,0.0021499784,0.0006750497,0.008759961,0.0001237365,0.00008584115,0.000074967866,0.00003781994,0.04160023],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930166,0.0016240845,0.00009474326,0.00033177374,0.0014813931,0.0034514333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903356,0.0029520846,0.0005262354,0.00029235435,0.0016146088,0.0042791753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064230855,0.00033737504,0.00034872792,0.001166143,0.037857376,0.008447931,0.0017795532,0.0032492047,0.006241844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008625361,0.00036853904,0.0003445308,0.001933708,0.015629506,0.003652124,0.0080019375,0.0033682482,0.0002977347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001239627,0.00017554215,0.02395505,0.0002647317,0.000036171492,0.0022306638,0.5255925,0.00046350824,0.0006166868,0.2641175,0.100252725,0.08217094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006462324,0.000049875947,0.03797175,0.00031805245,0.000024214447,0.00016969495,0.29357958,0.0003099922,0.00036901096,0.013579235,0.6534954,0.000068674206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97849065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99310416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12324584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12324584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17286727,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89421535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217921825","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1035","title":"Book Review: A Note Concerning: \"When Old Meets New\": Civil Remedies in the Criminal Context, a Paper by J. P. Laporte, D. Sean McGarrity and Jamie Nelson","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Criminology; Law; Sociology; Political science; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.03868620263210288,"score_gpt":0.26764720297669015,"score_spread":0.22896100034458727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217921825","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002425105,0.44193143,0.00065907923,0.35347986,0.15250824,0.000062527695,0.00079464994,0.00015998985,0.050161723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048970724,0.43334842,0.0012428641,0.201751,0.1477997,0.00016422602,0.0009259892,0.00028074667,0.20959003],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972126,0.00044300372,0.00020994018,0.00027289416,0.001717748,0.00014379947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760006,0.011474909,0.0012037506,0.00045862267,0.010019854,0.0008422914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026782982,0.0008255375,0.0019634846,0.0038280494,0.0019415377,0.0067860936,0.0023882065,0.007826964,0.026338166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021733826,0.0006214503,0.00074080104,0.0072535733,0.0019475373,0.004850422,0.0012462462,0.0069598006,0.024755856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017428921,0.000001912118,0.000016774959,0.00009176385,0.0000018896374,0.000006333445,0.00000769686,0.00001986839,0.000008427863,0.00066280446,0.99241793,0.006762788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048318307,0.0000060468137,0.00025221036,0.0006566391,0.0000076104006,0.000047105284,0.000028149558,0.000043629418,0.000027345222,0.0011539,0.9977622,0.000010290943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021910347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06706524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026338166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005923972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00958615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08810991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224330119","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1022","title":"Independent Child Legal Representation: A Concept in the Making","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032219969325136384,"score_gpt":0.37999114699862024,"score_spread":0.34777117767348387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224330119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051972833,0.008925039,0.09143082,0.27734157,0.002405951,0.00020342112,0.00013736231,0.00007537896,0.5675076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96899647,0.0014755792,0.009157109,0.0072528007,0.0011833026,0.00027502523,0.000038065253,0.000043861204,0.011577742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734629,0.01747996,0.00083001505,0.0022836202,0.0038447715,0.002098895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97257745,0.019576143,0.0018555326,0.0017878466,0.0018914927,0.0023116162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033512622,0.0006003129,0.0011424185,0.0048070145,0.015432042,0.025025055,0.0055044563,0.01753383,0.0062054168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04894835,0.00067803054,0.00095143047,0.0040595727,0.11662178,0.02462402,0.012307873,0.015567556,0.00035015424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015214003,0.0000040488308,0.000052157437,0.0000033243434,7.1520174e-7,0.000011704903,0.001517315,0.000032061358,0.0000066755274,0.9971131,0.0005053366,0.000752106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008416883,0.000012287485,0.00022278968,0.00013568805,0.0000071231866,0.00008738917,0.0051278584,0.00044826986,0.000072272465,0.96631527,0.02754474,0.000017857037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005870587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005415939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033512622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010151961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016870163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17723382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2226225805","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1018","title":"Legalized Age Discrimination","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.20657304417274822,"score_gpt":0.4728501307609806,"score_spread":0.26627708658823235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2226225805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041229196,0.0021901457,0.007919577,0.023077797,0.002157148,0.00022089014,0.00059608615,0.0002083278,0.9224008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7083768,0.0023058588,0.008507357,0.05599022,0.0018157313,0.00059410266,0.00056167727,0.00009798054,0.22175018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905882,0.0016996214,0.00061653624,0.0010510397,0.0036359562,0.0024086537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99159724,0.0027477946,0.0011240966,0.001873415,0.0019451001,0.0007123475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006028154,0.0003118615,0.00043592716,0.0012660098,0.0051068366,0.004773326,0.0018716039,0.007023256,0.017048003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020195073,0.00036373638,0.0006648207,0.00075625296,0.00522482,0.002732115,0.0056637605,0.0056354436,0.0030818752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001803739,0.00014613567,0.0041292724,0.000074204865,0.000009055957,0.0004552404,0.0032692128,0.00010164099,0.0007857972,0.91204304,0.03851535,0.040453043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088796965,0.00018650587,0.018127797,0.0010639568,0.000048954982,0.0023917577,0.0027334169,0.00074460125,0.0025516828,0.2522397,0.7197133,0.0001095778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009841168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01703999,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017048003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024092498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009061068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057031274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2228125395","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1311","title":"Does Community Legal Education Work? Educating English Language Students about Consumer Contracts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Legal profession; Legal education; Legal service; Public relations; Legal advice; Legal research; Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Political science; Business; Law","score_opus":0.031500144782425334,"score_gpt":0.44243159157489337,"score_spread":0.410931446792468,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2228125395","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91478044,0.0014403376,0.00020311281,0.050656345,0.00014230142,0.000116195,0.000023114404,0.000014886467,0.032623127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901896,0.0015104793,0.00039495062,0.004011851,0.000048409074,0.00006425692,0.000025615105,0.0000058999804,0.0037489403],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949405,0.0026313874,0.00007531937,0.00024036638,0.0006640087,0.0014484726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803571,0.009057732,0.001897002,0.00045134453,0.001277462,0.006959373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072530373,0.00016891622,0.0004313148,0.000979243,0.0058937864,0.004371957,0.0014259822,0.0027937097,0.00919889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022752792,0.00035927942,0.00036388778,0.00096066075,0.0030505224,0.003983293,0.0037312328,0.0027013868,0.0007983947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019983976,0.025395127,0.183166,0.0008085607,0.00010753931,0.0009446454,0.237586,0.00019986434,0.0010436492,0.013566124,0.028537026,0.5084456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046094952,0.0023457285,0.28617528,0.0025129034,0.00017864353,0.00043261042,0.60781693,0.0009797661,0.00120481,0.009673279,0.08811965,0.00009947146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025769925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071911596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025769925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002786564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015901428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051239848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2231233859","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1044","title":"Criminalizing Poverty: The Criminal Law Power and the Safe Streets Act","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Regulation and Compliance Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Law; Criminal law; Power (physics); Poverty; Sociology","score_opus":0.046108332090115035,"score_gpt":0.28150578334901044,"score_spread":0.2353974512588954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2231233859","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19847667,0.014302174,0.00052453205,0.39864725,0.00054483546,0.00009763015,0.00039284865,0.0000196052,0.38699442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9028066,0.006962998,0.00022755068,0.0151399765,0.00021076691,0.00010878402,0.000107927575,0.000018317047,0.074417196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954448,0.0011971958,0.00008303556,0.00013033758,0.0009759736,0.0021685893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567693,0.0014007235,0.0005629784,0.00013375035,0.0007758766,0.0014496762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024663308,0.00021071444,0.00025367946,0.0011687574,0.01044009,0.0046726656,0.0010054623,0.0036039865,0.0043948228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00913313,0.0002757643,0.0002098671,0.0013998409,0.012374142,0.002364317,0.0033753691,0.003504929,0.0004112061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004303899,0.00006252427,0.019599406,0.000082984196,0.000012517608,0.000513999,0.028203866,0.00037248738,0.000107432345,0.7951736,0.120838985,0.034989152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006560247,0.000062979925,0.10002474,0.0013237973,0.000049792063,0.00021802021,0.060006738,0.0014786628,0.0002837089,0.122277305,0.7141301,0.000078471785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7924801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.918965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7924801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025200771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05632473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.417484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2239109778","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1017","title":"Failing to Achieve Equality: Disability Rights in Australia, Canada, and the United States","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.060404405439880765,"score_gpt":0.39144367717276607,"score_spread":0.3310392717328853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2239109778","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.666187,0.0079027945,0.000454777,0.052623358,0.00021480117,0.00007972323,0.00018266798,0.000012248115,0.27234253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98058915,0.002254145,0.0001738728,0.0026494567,0.000016957598,0.000029994906,0.00003501516,0.000006427668,0.014245026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913754,0.0013201681,0.00015364666,0.00037551983,0.00176296,0.0050123674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951857,0.000614177,0.00033544647,0.00013126756,0.0012472408,0.0024862417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027513143,0.00026193622,0.0005234712,0.0021657755,0.027745085,0.007275788,0.0014750628,0.001966973,0.0054529277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007566793,0.00023941758,0.00027829246,0.0036160615,0.015676085,0.003537545,0.00795474,0.0030391626,0.00019796116],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001130709,0.0001982778,0.07639272,0.00023495402,0.000047862897,0.0010511297,0.2806579,0.00091178395,0.00031991856,0.49917856,0.023058604,0.11783526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053888172,0.00008199235,0.26792517,0.001439281,0.00007156024,0.00032754854,0.4585747,0.00095343875,0.0003335613,0.04518549,0.22490704,0.00014647053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99582565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09056493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09056493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19559367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65709764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254561243","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1011","title":"DNA, Discrimination and the Definition of Family Class: M.A.O. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Citizenship; Family reunification; Immigration law; Political science; Refugee; Charter; Kinship; Family law; Law; Ethnic group; Contradiction","score_opus":0.03395841325068359,"score_gpt":0.3068113461500742,"score_spread":0.2728529328993906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254561243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060712595,0.08324455,0.0010784674,0.7585243,0.0075975964,0.00015842581,0.0010582526,0.00004048422,0.08758532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65359133,0.03520596,0.0015186099,0.18647195,0.002366311,0.0001655082,0.00042637144,0.00006356482,0.12019036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977233,0.00047159835,0.00007456199,0.00020037996,0.00077646674,0.0007536792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969215,0.0008681295,0.00025035843,0.000072886534,0.0010315833,0.0008555348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028559582,0.0003274831,0.00040712245,0.0014196566,0.011945172,0.0054849265,0.0017155797,0.0040705106,0.0028687867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004801718,0.0002509089,0.00025581708,0.0019548305,0.010178417,0.0016682547,0.0015913245,0.0044367383,0.00022443499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094704905,0.00007524971,0.046480067,0.00033122775,0.000032280714,0.00055356143,0.035577517,0.0004877561,0.0006046389,0.38136613,0.4808401,0.053556804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040207495,0.000047138587,0.089081004,0.0013040695,0.000030747877,0.00023775907,0.03168947,0.0004741892,0.00038842336,0.023375625,0.85321,0.000121338904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9601652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9781147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039834797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036279593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05964863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26322806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298629448","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1226","title":"Disability Disclosure in the Digital Age: Why the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario Should Reform its Approach to Anonymized Decisions","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Economic Justice; Anonymity; Order (exchange); Political science; Human rights; Test (biology); Psychology; Law; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.1287281627626233,"score_gpt":0.3948650315556137,"score_spread":0.26613686879299037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298629448","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019727405,0.0033581313,0.005952416,0.8583087,0.0014905327,0.000107334105,0.000128312,0.000057335114,0.11086987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6764351,0.0040309946,0.005849291,0.25114596,0.0018710049,0.0001596694,0.00008312536,0.00012037845,0.060304403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96099806,0.009793208,0.00145651,0.0032144825,0.01729087,0.0072468016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96225375,0.016937029,0.0018382139,0.0027645563,0.012473591,0.003732801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032129675,0.00042079296,0.0005957405,0.0013898291,0.023740772,0.013995787,0.0037846987,0.016168611,0.0034801753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046236135,0.00067740533,0.00083020603,0.00229245,0.053249042,0.0087177325,0.0064425752,0.01431722,0.0005876068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030472487,0.000019793382,0.0018660194,0.00008536113,0.0000114918585,0.00030364853,0.019471232,0.00040478917,0.00027196144,0.8950148,0.06764058,0.014879807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007285709,0.000029535091,0.004716592,0.0004726931,0.00003323587,0.00020496803,0.015516752,0.001297744,0.00057028735,0.15484019,0.82203746,0.00020777273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9185535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92949903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11675679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11675679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17044456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84713376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298982224","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1227","title":"Book Review: The Healing Journey: Intimate Partner Abuse and Its Implications in the Labour Market, by Linda DeRiviere","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Employment and Welfare Studies","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.05312465136043509,"score_gpt":0.4357176441346551,"score_spread":0.38259299277422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298982224","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011705102,0.6092884,0.0001157285,0.22382936,0.15713614,0.000028288152,0.00010243633,0.000022496397,0.00936019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022534088,0.57816094,0.0002380007,0.1463481,0.19884026,0.00011481588,0.00015624284,0.0000690654,0.0738191],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983193,0.0005679591,0.00014507156,0.00019837328,0.000638609,0.00013066262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898482,0.0059312945,0.00044572036,0.00017361507,0.0027870014,0.00081420306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023560366,0.0013405872,0.0018008891,0.0030946706,0.0024790673,0.006341382,0.002127862,0.008459707,0.012577035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015031117,0.0008413442,0.0007369551,0.0034688541,0.0031087098,0.0050129043,0.0021774438,0.009699504,0.0076995846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033923995,0.0000046526648,0.000023363042,0.00016453613,0.0000022649604,0.00001982081,0.000033896653,0.000011178942,0.000006965566,0.00043952043,0.9941105,0.0051798606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008905529,0.000011298172,0.00030277905,0.0014389701,0.000009133828,0.00022684436,0.00022307479,0.000022565644,0.000017818798,0.0009221739,0.9968041,0.00001238895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0228043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07033426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0228043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051055746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0085803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0453431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299216227","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Women’s Rights to Social Security and Social Protection, edited by Beth Goldblatt & Lucie Lamarche","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020987411187825513,"score_gpt":0.3348572030205768,"score_spread":0.3138697918327513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299216227","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009571556,0.8914988,0.0002169655,0.04484986,0.04126497,0.000022544184,0.00023221901,0.000024492634,0.021794455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018751128,0.78877777,0.00038430424,0.021068094,0.027572928,0.0000730761,0.00037218002,0.000075776974,0.15980077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990188,0.00023658578,0.00005810853,0.00012106146,0.00048466073,0.000080774626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99742824,0.001315439,0.00012489116,0.00006126953,0.0008921778,0.0001780998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013759958,0.0012765998,0.0018925213,0.0036278472,0.001112219,0.0033834553,0.0012556871,0.0030961537,0.028503124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045314915,0.00067079306,0.0005013613,0.0049856487,0.0016465278,0.0030342008,0.0014543842,0.003770972,0.014322921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070048477,0.0000073311317,0.000021773318,0.00041943582,0.0000046305668,0.000010732887,0.000043372333,0.00002940787,0.00004134506,0.0021707995,0.96869534,0.028548686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004755777,0.000006611791,0.00017352804,0.0010618265,0.0000052918795,0.000042945838,0.00006616551,0.00001322263,0.000027542641,0.0012393161,0.9973531,0.0000055815512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023550706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06820025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028503124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040786164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007858037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09535241},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301007804","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1225","title":"Socioeconomic Rights Adjudication in Canada: Can the Minimum Core Help in Adjudicating the Rights to Life and Security of the Person under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"BC Cancer Agency","keywords":"Charter; Adjudication; Human rights; Justiciability; Political science; Social rights; Obligation; Right to health; Fundamental rights; International human rights law; Reservation of rights; Core (optical fiber); Law and economics; Law; Right to property; Sociology","score_opus":0.025416866768160604,"score_gpt":0.27763242342667305,"score_spread":0.2522155566585124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301007804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27925465,0.010111754,0.012014431,0.30032918,0.0016847892,0.00052738213,0.0010802834,0.00014868744,0.39484885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8988339,0.0042859837,0.008140275,0.027720347,0.00014243202,0.00014634381,0.00027331084,0.00006214934,0.06039542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9829974,0.0027384874,0.00054163835,0.00120313,0.0072427914,0.0052765645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9817841,0.0058059483,0.00091270334,0.0006182127,0.008541567,0.0023375144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012468804,0.00045056932,0.00054318534,0.002570945,0.036412116,0.011657075,0.0034471785,0.0061901584,0.0038404178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031482,0.00062125275,0.00063946564,0.004190376,0.013023095,0.0040970626,0.0054146238,0.0076732417,0.00024058415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070452414,0.000059058522,0.015698755,0.00019240177,0.000033160308,0.0017842251,0.036868535,0.00084774906,0.0007337878,0.8269829,0.07393301,0.042795934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000116359646,0.00009361573,0.07563061,0.0012495663,0.00014916316,0.0007183728,0.092103906,0.007347153,0.002566647,0.109275766,0.7102045,0.00054437655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20895182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20895182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40499836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9175038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301640391","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1223","title":"Zoning Out Discrimination: Working Towards Housing Equality in Ontario","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zoning; Legislation; Fair Housing Act; Government (linguistics); Business; Code of practice; Political science; Housing discrimination; Local government; Public administration; Law; Civil rights; Engineering","score_opus":0.16208210230751194,"score_gpt":0.4056902367806582,"score_spread":0.24360813447314625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301640391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5338279,0.005030838,0.0058540376,0.13039726,0.00035198496,0.00024309092,0.0001283342,0.000075191594,0.32409135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95183116,0.0018329534,0.0016389008,0.0052562947,0.00004014015,0.000048119648,0.000044571527,0.000023290233,0.039284483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99267936,0.0013059246,0.00016470936,0.000484672,0.0022939765,0.0030713957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613404,0.0007979105,0.00044427373,0.00018294397,0.0009892565,0.0014515871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042728167,0.0002369911,0.00031595337,0.00085873576,0.039567653,0.006887025,0.0016583785,0.003035814,0.005069711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007340703,0.00037971907,0.0003524991,0.0018400775,0.014525617,0.0027243,0.008052232,0.0026073162,0.0002546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001527274,0.00015198762,0.09941957,0.00047495114,0.000066751665,0.0036845128,0.28975558,0.0027126656,0.0037576545,0.34345752,0.08059785,0.17576818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006170445,0.00011615797,0.108795196,0.00042207653,0.000057584737,0.00044881078,0.20682332,0.0017104961,0.0012808036,0.031843636,0.6483368,0.00010337631],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98419076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99461645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12225272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12225272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20175591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8870097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2301725652","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1222","title":"The Cost of Uncertainty: Navigating the Boundary Between Legal Information and Legal Services in the Access to Justice Sector","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Disadvantaged; CLARITY; Business; Variety (cybernetics); Public relations; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.048241454563298536,"score_gpt":0.4264439621798989,"score_spread":0.37820250761660035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2301725652","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57501394,0.0038393748,0.031853896,0.18034385,0.0002560756,0.0002797316,0.000073330164,0.00005377084,0.20828605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951255,0.0005111815,0.0022397614,0.0012921748,0.000028762284,0.00006594347,0.000004642781,0.000013240869,0.00071893167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.950736,0.037455115,0.0009679404,0.001079521,0.0050278935,0.0047334917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9015099,0.08297809,0.0056874207,0.0017268921,0.004071196,0.00402646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03245428,0.00036662538,0.00077325007,0.0033044256,0.02172817,0.030498208,0.0028059634,0.007491291,0.004805981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09160256,0.0009004359,0.00050129276,0.0027483003,0.048160985,0.026403576,0.022810351,0.008196573,0.00025912415],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097607684,0.0001362244,0.00927633,0.00020662442,0.00003215529,0.0017250985,0.20652623,0.0021900095,0.00032628071,0.74004275,0.0027654518,0.036675222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031954005,0.000095382384,0.006106761,0.0010400297,0.000053569354,0.0006335654,0.4685407,0.0045829257,0.00052339776,0.48809433,0.030183386,0.00011393708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03686946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038098935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03686946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021215584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025043985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1716367},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302374884","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1224","title":"Government Efforts to Address Bullying in Canada: Any Place for Children’s Rights?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Education Discipline and Inequality","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Legislation; Child rights; Political science; Inclusion (mineral); Human rights; Government (linguistics); International human rights law; Public administration; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028811600257103408,"score_gpt":0.3489308298829831,"score_spread":0.3201192296258797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302374884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23318194,0.017325504,0.0011550322,0.58286446,0.0007953264,0.00011028875,0.0005348284,0.000087935136,0.16394468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9269869,0.009798904,0.0016863965,0.041685086,0.00014723012,0.000050174473,0.00015875678,0.00003821443,0.01944856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916284,0.00071468623,0.00011793588,0.0003339212,0.002565735,0.0046392474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876759,0.0020042479,0.0010575585,0.0003139815,0.0038171916,0.005131192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039893044,0.00032602152,0.00050441094,0.0017147583,0.019985326,0.0072622173,0.002598333,0.003114292,0.005505696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01328686,0.00031469107,0.00052912656,0.0030750993,0.009707389,0.0032053536,0.004434717,0.0065335706,0.00023153493],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009882191,0.00026560578,0.10405867,0.00078214955,0.000103690676,0.000809172,0.08399902,0.00072165986,0.0009831445,0.47486058,0.10404903,0.22926846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008683265,0.00013572689,0.29655775,0.0028023375,0.0001992339,0.00021748042,0.133314,0.00077414094,0.0012073785,0.027025105,0.5374545,0.00022548056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9979936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12957321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12957321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39551333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94012386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344325849","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1020","title":"Goliath Arisen: Taking Aim at the Health Care Regime in Auton","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Health care; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029603809876643825,"score_gpt":0.37182756326721056,"score_spread":0.3422237533905667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344325849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49252418,0.0023489383,0.00053052424,0.10235804,0.00065361726,0.00008805616,0.00013472675,0.000025432057,0.40133655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906321,0.00041976213,0.00020947674,0.019197926,0.00012943303,0.00002608033,0.000027578282,0.00001278866,0.089344956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980387,0.00034315445,0.000026827536,0.0001449127,0.0002394629,0.0012069503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889624,0.00032715735,0.000097906755,0.000062253384,0.00023653012,0.00037998683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019186009,0.00015846734,0.00017882632,0.00062823744,0.013345375,0.004931109,0.0006739422,0.0038907402,0.011000262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003307914,0.00015834106,0.00019347809,0.00045973208,0.010669887,0.001378557,0.0039623887,0.003910289,0.00046198067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055934295,0.000040889405,0.012301512,0.00005940694,0.000010131229,0.0019770695,0.06258371,0.0002863081,0.0005497779,0.87369704,0.03337742,0.015060798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005555264,0.000078095625,0.047503367,0.0004491194,0.000024170986,0.0006576778,0.10209333,0.0007107552,0.0008865811,0.06261682,0.7848568,0.00006773809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3969473,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6394441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3969473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027534164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020765398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7892736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2344469281","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1032","title":"Decisions Adverse to a Household - Protecting Social Housing Tenants under the Social Housing Reform Act and the Tenant Protection Act","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Korean Urban and Social Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care","keywords":"Public housing; Business; Fair Housing Act; Economic growth; Political science; Law; Civil rights; Economics","score_opus":0.05366660004800709,"score_gpt":0.29343295371952666,"score_spread":0.23976635367151955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2344469281","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37402868,0.0015797775,0.0019060853,0.111084536,0.0010820084,0.0008317879,0.0014795028,0.00009322385,0.5079144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73596627,0.0006269941,0.00067162846,0.05072412,0.00026775576,0.00036656944,0.00029311082,0.000027982062,0.21105556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978794,0.0020018972,0.00031896544,0.0004130561,0.0021243314,0.0053538554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518615,0.0012828704,0.0005720065,0.0002144681,0.0013903008,0.001354146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005713314,0.00042847183,0.00039282048,0.000587713,0.011914135,0.004790952,0.0016749749,0.012016987,0.00763467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009814538,0.000663975,0.00056091073,0.0008253775,0.003734242,0.0013913097,0.00304153,0.0037223294,0.001118444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00052897737,0.00037376024,0.0638514,0.00014575511,0.00008986481,0.003242163,0.04128812,0.0010605677,0.0038518198,0.5400991,0.3199205,0.025547983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031716345,0.0003980899,0.1562388,0.00035763587,0.00023949363,0.00048335068,0.03394011,0.0019287665,0.0039559547,0.019010466,0.7829129,0.0002172927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7197341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8817513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7197341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012457318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038133018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5638329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519823424","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1007","title":"To Serve Some and Protect Fewer: The Toronto Police Services' Policy on Non-Status Victims and Witnesses of Crimes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.014225763750560526,"score_gpt":0.3414094428253404,"score_spread":0.3271836790747799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519823424","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14597999,0.0142471185,0.00042751708,0.7133738,0.002575422,0.00033005697,0.0009185394,0.00008294431,0.12206461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6929553,0.0126144,0.0006390774,0.105295375,0.0012538593,0.00034346897,0.0005331423,0.00008030521,0.18628505],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99494743,0.0009931835,0.00018483025,0.00023992603,0.0010319824,0.0026026904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97976685,0.0024447658,0.0014155189,0.0003241416,0.002694532,0.013354295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033105214,0.0005126958,0.00029405864,0.0013348351,0.011245658,0.006519385,0.0023963433,0.006379105,0.01912953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010923785,0.0008270504,0.0003302333,0.0015232256,0.004509658,0.003166045,0.0048783007,0.0049874634,0.0011876283],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029500315,0.00018922624,0.04275612,0.00092030456,0.000059641905,0.0028013526,0.04508844,0.0008516952,0.001483168,0.09895438,0.75320286,0.053397723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023536425,0.00019597926,0.24845858,0.0016683309,0.000101466765,0.00052631326,0.078986384,0.0010936804,0.00057687954,0.0031803765,0.66483027,0.00014642223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9464984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9831777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055494882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055494882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16205287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4026454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2519902374","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1036","title":"The Coroner's Inquest as an Equality Rights Mechanism: A Case Study of the May-Iles Coroner's Inquest into Domestic Violence in Ontario","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues","field":"Medicine","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inquest; Coroner; Law; Political science; Medicine; Medical emergency; Suicide prevention; Poison control","score_opus":0.03732909370354272,"score_gpt":0.3631088834145982,"score_spread":0.3257797897110555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2519902374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91772276,0.0012188625,0.00070152467,0.03430859,0.00016476636,0.0003777632,0.00009693489,0.000014115131,0.045394816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98143184,0.0012547729,0.0005646445,0.0042151874,0.00006694998,0.00009352248,0.000020495434,0.00001802515,0.01233466],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884284,0.0039104023,0.00044774482,0.00052207406,0.0016495751,0.005041705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98080724,0.010872175,0.0023681743,0.00058968563,0.0019332899,0.0034294408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007083116,0.0004167272,0.00064134796,0.0017637535,0.06252861,0.0063429144,0.0034939959,0.012792783,0.0055741444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030588454,0.0014345497,0.00065336865,0.0037688336,0.012632446,0.0025505703,0.007042006,0.009552143,0.00029472692],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020368437,0.00047000544,0.096225955,0.00031965945,0.00006385103,0.11066264,0.700975,0.0007199883,0.0011461732,0.057866126,0.0152136125,0.01613324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008073481,0.00014257779,0.04081483,0.0005040969,0.000105329476,0.0109395785,0.8821103,0.000732021,0.00046978507,0.0029209468,0.061055284,0.00012448836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9309657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98516905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08053504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08053504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13807131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5843253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521839976","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1038","title":"The Reality beneath the Rhetoric: Probing the Discourses Surrounding the Safe Third Country Agreement","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Global Peace and Security Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Political science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.030307982592253438,"score_gpt":0.3460833871486099,"score_spread":0.3157754045563565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521839976","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14203964,0.00365803,0.013520986,0.50601465,0.0015558655,0.000067866546,0.000081305836,0.00005934081,0.33300227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9772739,0.00070146954,0.0010640909,0.015151223,0.000360846,0.00006576328,0.000019483612,0.00008501752,0.0052783224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95997167,0.03248809,0.0005855573,0.0012975315,0.0035155462,0.0021415837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8925378,0.099400155,0.0024382733,0.0017531149,0.002570464,0.0013002524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044880744,0.0006869998,0.000970785,0.0036333497,0.030011775,0.03067273,0.0036254558,0.020910934,0.004296033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07556337,0.00086095114,0.0007033082,0.0046536718,0.08520146,0.022296699,0.014060507,0.031810686,0.0004444956],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018011073,0.000010172705,0.00018736886,0.00003367977,0.0000034899078,0.00011598912,0.20160869,0.00007806228,0.00007376853,0.7924307,0.0037260968,0.0017139115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036363013,0.000037275146,0.0006443821,0.0007586995,0.000031823944,0.00015552803,0.36146116,0.00086337206,0.00076283456,0.4642411,0.17096122,0.000046303827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014287533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012329971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98571247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016643284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015733965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23735493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521906274","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1052","title":"Legal Ethics and Moral Dilemmas: Strategizing around Race in the Provision of Client Service","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Business Law and Ethics","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Service (business); Sociology; Public relations; Business; Political science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.07977746728504506,"score_gpt":0.32868903528524995,"score_spread":0.2489115680002049,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521906274","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13817033,0.0010948161,0.029127907,0.574759,0.0009332982,0.00018232767,0.000018893405,0.00005726546,0.25565612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768835,0.00033953087,0.004780586,0.012214688,0.00021785212,0.00013326027,0.000004599775,0.00004350258,0.005382477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.91995716,0.06490754,0.0008730623,0.0018631466,0.004929019,0.007470055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93195915,0.044566177,0.0043801344,0.0013640006,0.0055804043,0.012150152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052389067,0.00056411925,0.00081002095,0.002497786,0.036744446,0.032125708,0.0038213094,0.021839388,0.012813587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10476704,0.0009084736,0.0008374969,0.0015812094,0.06616824,0.026622852,0.018732041,0.016304987,0.00097952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009367603,0.00015608214,0.002815629,0.000080307276,0.000020259868,0.0006151031,0.08343599,0.000890835,0.00020727316,0.87711614,0.013570923,0.02099769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048120186,0.00006320895,0.0008507,0.00045417118,0.000026430047,0.00031390603,0.15237361,0.0027170463,0.00029465932,0.80468434,0.03812018,0.00005373742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015491848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028676122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052389067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020205133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06282954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2770632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2524527383","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1055","title":"Tax Equity and Homelessness: A Tax Policy Analysis of the Golden Report","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Tax reform; Public economics; Economics; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.056525503471237325,"score_gpt":0.3195842347256473,"score_spread":0.26305873125441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2524527383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9655198,0.001713518,0.00086025463,0.010267504,0.000075309494,0.000075288954,0.0010257813,0.000017456336,0.020445157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954839,0.00066477567,0.00012902312,0.00032498952,0.00005111962,0.000012954062,0.00019668236,0.0000066679,0.003129835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931157,0.00016263252,0.000017004071,0.000045297726,0.00010851975,0.00035492072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984108,0.0006092912,0.00034680928,0.00007311463,0.00020231886,0.00035764248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016382727,0.00019236098,0.0005171638,0.0012016955,0.0007310483,0.0020758752,0.00062281964,0.00089282903,0.0031433185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043909126,0.00012792558,0.0006424745,0.001529838,0.0012050512,0.0010189309,0.00119336,0.0012052486,0.00017001176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006907365,0.00050742424,0.31559289,0.00012580345,0.00020340693,0.0011649546,0.0037719123,0.011983861,0.0005532315,0.58464116,0.039558906,0.04120577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002576088,0.000772048,0.68822014,0.00038934025,0.000761805,0.0005321442,0.017008964,0.049094364,0.0023321228,0.17058848,0.06993997,0.000103043756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08142471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10673301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08142471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037990743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003846501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16190153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525209634","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1049","title":"Book Review: Worker's Compensation in Ontario, by D. G. Gilbert and L. A. Liverside","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Sociology; Psychology; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.020239699012251394,"score_gpt":0.289481850230657,"score_spread":0.26924215121840556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525209634","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028585558,0.8120388,0.00011677665,0.09734103,0.0717371,0.00006305302,0.0010521456,0.000049224458,0.01731609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034289686,0.68351996,0.0002642889,0.02871616,0.055345338,0.00008800631,0.0012833995,0.00007132666,0.2272826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904245,0.00008719861,0.00006619824,0.00009227742,0.0006051762,0.00010670834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951746,0.00071108306,0.00024673308,0.000084616004,0.0032416899,0.00054128084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014578112,0.0017429339,0.0015262986,0.004759234,0.002137009,0.0028957494,0.002227656,0.0040546595,0.021370362],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052356594,0.00085209764,0.00064493803,0.008320302,0.002009816,0.001950707,0.0010038103,0.002557852,0.009958702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048577504,0.0000024417593,0.00006862509,0.00014320876,0.0000023073906,0.000009865839,0.000012700311,0.000022251892,0.000010861535,0.000118905424,0.99239093,0.0072130933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009530177,0.000007326339,0.0022381484,0.000685312,0.000010781691,0.00006164695,0.0000667283,0.00002467808,0.00001760658,0.00021414153,0.9966537,0.000010312835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6467054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8897669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6467054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021846788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024209473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71075046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528060689","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1037","title":"Diminishing Returns: Age-Discriminatory Elements in the Employment Insurance Act","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Labour economics; Economics; Business","score_opus":0.192393658484688,"score_gpt":0.4434325464171506,"score_spread":0.25103888793246254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528060689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.101179235,0.005956319,0.011410521,0.14563714,0.00073288474,0.00020131048,0.00040547064,0.00008142891,0.73439574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90000796,0.002442331,0.003598351,0.03472059,0.0011372799,0.00029956718,0.000116834104,0.000034280867,0.057642758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892322,0.0029919476,0.0005894872,0.0010860056,0.0038525234,0.0022477915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856989,0.008986825,0.0014556885,0.0014766944,0.0014519976,0.00092994823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012055522,0.0003921808,0.00049945933,0.000734358,0.0058855396,0.0077687064,0.0018230634,0.011558275,0.007180682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031744085,0.00038722318,0.00068843976,0.00091540656,0.012049851,0.005796634,0.0052766316,0.009707193,0.0007222363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015558851,0.000037658872,0.0017656108,0.000014236096,0.00000604308,0.00020244409,0.0009908454,0.00029425035,0.00007768965,0.98329836,0.006611188,0.0066861883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008724997,0.00011064661,0.010696276,0.0004271713,0.000041555675,0.0004302912,0.001868232,0.0037390592,0.00045164072,0.80744934,0.1746015,0.00009697932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041286904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047470562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99398375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006016251,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011049696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08209318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528596893","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1012","title":"Civil Justice Problems and the Disability and Health Status of Canadians","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.07411402938534853,"score_gpt":0.43890315179963635,"score_spread":0.36478912241428785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528596893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97367734,0.0016160063,0.00003257903,0.0034824654,0.00004899221,0.000041783027,0.0038692877,0.000005693527,0.017225929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960376,0.00093327765,0.000031880263,0.0002090333,0.000014322701,0.000009369544,0.000824222,0.000002221128,0.0019380528],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865365,0.00007566552,0.00004683479,0.000071944094,0.00037623395,0.00077575573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598604,0.00018869512,0.00075293717,0.00008393187,0.0015660176,0.0014222376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008184571,0.0002235031,0.00032143376,0.0034213543,0.0054106605,0.0021118743,0.0009977624,0.00072413916,0.0070353104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005243983,0.00022850274,0.00051054475,0.0062391805,0.0015739106,0.0006542195,0.001479587,0.0009790289,0.00028814565],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053677188,0.00007507473,0.97936475,0.00005800872,0.000036443078,0.00016462212,0.0043562027,0.000134266,0.00005437506,0.0015021965,0.00416143,0.010038918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071050254,0.00001952907,0.98798454,0.000080701706,0.0000144556125,0.00006812085,0.0067235455,0.0001340992,0.000021047761,0.00015342326,0.0047794464,0.000014028963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99630827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029521259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029521259,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04293415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21419269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528824097","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1001","title":"A Closer Look at Seemingly Pro-Tenant Provisions in the Residential Tenancies Act","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Landlord; Notice; Renting; Legislature; Leasehold estate; Business; Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.030168176311533252,"score_gpt":0.35825166795438385,"score_spread":0.3280834916428506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528824097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41009682,0.0014025841,0.005980773,0.042152088,0.0003310359,0.00021287246,0.0005978018,0.0000719622,0.53915405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8805025,0.00069784815,0.0018017673,0.006400991,0.000094070885,0.00008213127,0.00010209467,0.00003060726,0.11028802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965802,0.00054659316,0.00011238593,0.00019169321,0.0013130327,0.0012561906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99674594,0.0017703683,0.00030686063,0.00015622261,0.0007859649,0.00023457226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021395802,0.00015745577,0.00022721748,0.0007091337,0.008371284,0.0044306554,0.0010955991,0.004009665,0.0034133338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005749399,0.0002852113,0.00046691237,0.0016881806,0.008882154,0.0015861968,0.0011499494,0.0034507741,0.00029587417],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040009072,0.000051678504,0.009094957,0.00005475929,0.000008916696,0.00055656146,0.037548523,0.00090552925,0.001299263,0.93001366,0.01181173,0.008614501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006311309,0.00018134262,0.136626,0.00026042608,0.00009143071,0.00038049763,0.08683805,0.0033907385,0.0023035405,0.06719323,0.7024679,0.00020370667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92241764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9770899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92241764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044531904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027248545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32310307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W253311260","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1207","title":"Fighting for the Right to Housing in Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wellesley Institute; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Appeal; Legislation; Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Economic Justice; Common law; Fair Housing Act; Public administration","score_opus":0.04495896988797166,"score_gpt":0.35400155828177166,"score_spread":0.3090425883938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W253311260","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3301735,0.0065412093,0.0022018538,0.10797792,0.00076580595,0.00020847937,0.00025808465,0.000068038775,0.5518052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9090673,0.0025846553,0.0013741802,0.016358692,0.000069633956,0.00003361573,0.000056719542,0.000026236268,0.07042899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951432,0.00032650837,0.00007655741,0.00027959692,0.0013208679,0.0028534434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806887,0.00039754304,0.00008909116,0.0000604574,0.00070299016,0.0006809513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015584345,0.0002574842,0.0003128758,0.0010401143,0.03801676,0.007323971,0.0017136339,0.0051601003,0.0052957875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042985757,0.0004659795,0.00043255108,0.0012779793,0.0074290656,0.0013820246,0.003679666,0.0054200245,0.00022580805],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005897175,0.00007080647,0.014936597,0.00011972232,0.000041800406,0.005474509,0.028298452,0.0019734423,0.0015339837,0.8566621,0.06002536,0.030804308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000698455,0.000052126252,0.036795527,0.0005334787,0.00011364678,0.0014423926,0.06956295,0.003330838,0.0022440723,0.04631309,0.8392299,0.0003121169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9961488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09844242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09844242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21112522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71425307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548941087","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1057","title":"Women's Voices Being Heard: Responsive Lawyering","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Gender studies; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04631599057308432,"score_gpt":0.4110980670236919,"score_spread":0.36478207645060756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548941087","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5862784,0.0053057787,0.0033495154,0.12750731,0.0021939815,0.0002383386,0.00003342721,0.000104927865,0.27498838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9560372,0.0018750323,0.0007918656,0.0072836517,0.00022473805,0.0000898944,0.000015077446,0.00002681138,0.033655666],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99245036,0.005046797,0.00010837079,0.00030230184,0.0006605824,0.0014316041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940031,0.0029175763,0.0005300022,0.00018368004,0.0003782185,0.0019874258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064833746,0.00031555453,0.00026731938,0.00058151357,0.013998085,0.007634334,0.0014432431,0.0036072822,0.012947405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013290249,0.00028678737,0.00024120221,0.00045783847,0.010433304,0.004050343,0.011037655,0.004213555,0.0010536155],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027431972,0.00016092142,0.003136782,0.00015863671,0.000006395682,0.0018026652,0.90125793,0.000034733064,0.0010213464,0.02422648,0.01221035,0.05595633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013156975,0.00009756816,0.0023268922,0.00026421354,0.000007856913,0.00038409932,0.8871628,0.000053069256,0.00029062436,0.003365941,0.106020585,0.00001319768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009468091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028419174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013998085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048329313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009196809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043313384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620610655","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1254","title":"Reconciling Reconciliation: Differing Conceptions of the Supreme Court of Canada and the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Healing Foundation","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Law; Indigenous; Political science; Sovereignty; Commission; Transitional justice; Context (archaeology); Economic Justice; Colonialism; Sociology; Indigenous rights; Human rights; History; Politics","score_opus":0.03263058099359439,"score_gpt":0.3134063653689297,"score_spread":0.2807757843753353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620610655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033876862,0.028808443,0.01784118,0.32822382,0.0014779987,0.00015337295,0.00021964865,0.00014950435,0.5892492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9464025,0.005764064,0.0063207285,0.02641537,0.0005375909,0.00012281966,0.00009335192,0.000105424864,0.014238175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94112855,0.02030096,0.001741889,0.0034593432,0.022042409,0.011326789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9638265,0.015877223,0.0016439303,0.0018655283,0.013309095,0.003477719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034174684,0.00066158397,0.0014097898,0.008484658,0.050320778,0.0440675,0.0061209677,0.017011603,0.0039307857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05847983,0.00075442,0.0010742658,0.010351163,0.10679726,0.0172061,0.012963806,0.023366356,0.0002759363],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004200557,0.000002362309,0.00009387659,0.000011547188,0.0000030939104,0.000034186054,0.0082561,0.000124927,0.000011447934,0.9861885,0.003245786,0.0020239295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033042004,0.000012880952,0.0015726737,0.0008162746,0.000049681836,0.00012837141,0.030828407,0.0015166083,0.00019071148,0.7308618,0.23376223,0.00022729489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94995433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94676757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7967273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2032727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25827035,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92409074},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620765319","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1257","title":"Small Claims Court: A Vehicle for Social Change and the Case for Equitable Relief","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Mandate; Appeal; Grassroots; Legislature; Political science; Law; Scope (computer science); Debt; Public administration; Business; Politics","score_opus":0.1706944303902091,"score_gpt":0.40060602750015883,"score_spread":0.22991159710994974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620765319","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037659243,0.003878144,0.010647313,0.57859373,0.00099514,0.00010314005,0.00004794313,0.000057175246,0.36801818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.880827,0.0015884872,0.0026498467,0.050213303,0.0008321399,0.00012812948,0.000030808373,0.000065204156,0.06366508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98031086,0.007355041,0.00042026766,0.0017109857,0.0059225718,0.0042803553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865333,0.005975999,0.00086538907,0.0011950572,0.0022867327,0.0031435173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019569032,0.0002927612,0.00047643296,0.0012226583,0.026044546,0.016128505,0.0030892747,0.011977062,0.009080767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033128217,0.00040142096,0.00044351915,0.0011073775,0.061584722,0.009784587,0.011363696,0.011936396,0.00063142786],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006580243,0.000009556691,0.00051378255,0.000013697255,0.0000029130838,0.00021466239,0.0064311945,0.000102050195,0.00008208139,0.96989125,0.016140735,0.0065913447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003800524,0.000028330607,0.003162436,0.00031069943,0.000013883343,0.00030673968,0.01612894,0.00096496736,0.0002004202,0.5100177,0.46877345,0.00005450857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38844413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50965464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38844413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03920503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06623937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7723663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620782846","doi":"","title":"Charter Litigation, Social and Economic Rights & Civil Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Civil rights; Political science; Social rights; Law and economics; Law; Human rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.02745461013366895,"score_gpt":0.3526265116974939,"score_spread":0.32517190156382497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620782846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13553812,0.033066116,0.0017552738,0.20423697,0.00058358855,0.000107226275,0.00016176564,0.000021005691,0.62452996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95565295,0.007033383,0.0003966497,0.0066644093,0.00046282055,0.000085929256,0.00002093289,0.000011928656,0.029670967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99639773,0.0016253942,0.00013793955,0.00021341935,0.0004256665,0.0011998331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907658,0.0074952706,0.0008217626,0.00020936118,0.00036052105,0.00034730506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046304455,0.00041278082,0.00043988027,0.001972973,0.014105223,0.015580598,0.0010188586,0.013585511,0.015797442],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014445828,0.0004674893,0.00030490066,0.003742628,0.028388554,0.007858971,0.0040684314,0.008327316,0.0004846929],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000090058375,0.000018320889,0.00035137552,0.0000389268,0.0000024239575,0.00026461968,0.00483281,0.00008143981,0.000053326512,0.9888382,0.003172033,0.0023374988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064505286,0.00006140473,0.008335111,0.0011806418,0.000046397297,0.0007692759,0.044023953,0.0005666921,0.0005702292,0.7710884,0.1732296,0.00006371767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044520445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065081894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044520445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011215239,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017776368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08852261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620857392","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1260","title":"Networking the Rule of Law: The Canadian Bar Association’s Abandoned Intervention in Chevron v Yaiguaje","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Law; Intervention (counseling); Legislature; Corporate governance; Corporation; Politics; Supreme court; Sociology; Multinational corporation; Legal profession; Public administration; Management","score_opus":0.05769061674622808,"score_gpt":0.40998201729470296,"score_spread":0.35229140054847485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620857392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45237374,0.004331483,0.0034137333,0.2136588,0.0010466047,0.00019964116,0.00012489007,0.00013416918,0.3247169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95616394,0.00053267705,0.00047518726,0.017787604,0.00008275207,0.000037108042,0.000024552055,0.000042644875,0.024853516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98400104,0.0024150067,0.00015509588,0.0017867018,0.004227897,0.007414224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992611,0.0029277513,0.00044953273,0.0002954505,0.0015652347,0.0021510434],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069768587,0.00045174407,0.000553783,0.0016067214,0.07977696,0.016203115,0.0044636843,0.01444699,0.0049590063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018356046,0.0008357454,0.0005151395,0.001859508,0.031297702,0.004071717,0.007225899,0.014519516,0.00030134348],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011870594,0.0001315013,0.010979751,0.000103289225,0.00005596544,0.0050454335,0.2338732,0.0012559106,0.0015132858,0.6393845,0.06819819,0.03934027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114694,0.00011608005,0.023354761,0.00038712675,0.00015136618,0.0007719635,0.23011616,0.0020397296,0.0018759706,0.040419634,0.7003092,0.0003433456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98635453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15833652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15833652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18032321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97621036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620997730","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1256","title":"“Don’t Want to Get Exposed”: Law’s Violence and Access to Justice","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Criminology; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05194663206499233,"score_gpt":0.39562403984215405,"score_spread":0.3436774077771617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620997730","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.838256,0.0027938425,0.0015527054,0.088963285,0.00025209808,0.000036272897,0.000029552466,0.000020190197,0.06809609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953074,0.0003701441,0.00009122849,0.0030992522,0.000010656098,0.000008791981,0.000003778969,0.0000055534265,0.0011031455],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98612565,0.009888312,0.00022007851,0.00047119122,0.0010804848,0.0022143864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914191,0.004518984,0.00090517855,0.0002278697,0.0007520479,0.002176878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006218162,0.0002495145,0.00045702004,0.001032476,0.025168836,0.011032612,0.0014975622,0.0036280027,0.0034104753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015972884,0.00038606545,0.00028729226,0.0010457733,0.05982635,0.008303098,0.009989765,0.007224401,0.00023795587],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012137492,0.000029075707,0.0042191185,0.00004031499,0.0000072520115,0.00049537123,0.9601535,0.000019332241,0.000118317104,0.029550865,0.0016209605,0.0037337118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035727467,0.000010335463,0.0021738836,0.00013702983,0.0000049495693,0.0002194457,0.9815073,0.00003772743,0.00005002169,0.005947442,0.009894844,0.0000135106675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19685683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25656024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19685683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013694004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014707005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39142197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2621078189","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1259","title":"The Intersection of Exploitation and Coercion in Cases of Canadian Labour Trafficking","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Coercion (linguistics); Human trafficking; Criminology; Political science; Sex trafficking; Intervention (counseling); Sociology; Psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.04175863244943335,"score_gpt":0.3547033492986688,"score_spread":0.31294471684923547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2621078189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8605651,0.058963083,0.0013841212,0.008306125,0.00032077314,0.00034031362,0.0017464058,0.0000516996,0.06832234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442838,0.049557652,0.0012025913,0.0010212093,0.00006306767,0.00006927831,0.0005577733,0.000033310676,0.0032114203],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993472,0.0010450679,0.0006203653,0.00047756595,0.0030081745,0.0013769511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98803806,0.0034573257,0.002872223,0.0006313942,0.0042222305,0.0007787916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004353502,0.000540927,0.00046305513,0.015177833,0.01661526,0.0053968807,0.0021429597,0.0012702527,0.0022685898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017757762,0.0005669643,0.0004017904,0.024076454,0.008516391,0.0019349441,0.0045611314,0.0013491735,0.00022880534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007123864,0.000038231356,0.19099161,0.003621744,0.00008019726,0.022228863,0.6405028,0.00026681492,0.0011532563,0.013140405,0.012956282,0.114948615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003870409,0.00003025534,0.27229062,0.0056131845,0.00013905382,0.01812768,0.56545997,0.00023489607,0.00083001604,0.0012450521,0.13588692,0.00013844608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9726247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9886141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045306165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045306165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09099322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32872075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W264322951","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1210","title":"The Right to Housing in France: Still a Long Way to Go from Intention to Implementation","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Residence; Right to the city; State (computer science); Public housing; Law; Political science; Business; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03707366967106825,"score_gpt":0.304258972785062,"score_spread":0.26718530311399374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W264322951","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0858044,0.053689096,0.0126244,0.59744084,0.0025797298,0.000050483774,0.00010739348,0.00015617155,0.24754746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9170845,0.013799377,0.0035758126,0.03277783,0.001642719,0.000095543284,0.00006406208,0.0000826126,0.030877577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98971623,0.005242573,0.00022546388,0.0007590381,0.0021717842,0.0018848268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968683,0.0018047421,0.00027425998,0.00028587194,0.0005092191,0.00025754387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011277334,0.00050289003,0.00071785296,0.00089187594,0.0061734165,0.012833731,0.0013430741,0.0066986894,0.0034672273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008043396,0.0003080225,0.00061792665,0.0009498395,0.032394934,0.008123867,0.003823359,0.0071728225,0.0005506869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060862108,0.000019147907,0.00042373978,0.000037620794,0.0000051949155,0.00008662231,0.0042808065,0.00018824107,0.000067580855,0.9745111,0.0067866193,0.013587149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039773546,0.00013148267,0.0069085127,0.0010431757,0.00001632233,0.00023298181,0.010705585,0.00074942363,0.0003989296,0.34569794,0.63398504,0.00009081398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064928345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037571687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064928345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015994499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011054047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12910086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2750962442","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1266","title":"The Complications of Colonialism for Gentrification Theory and Marxist Geography","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Urban Planning and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Gentrification; Indigenous; Marxist philosophy; Colonialism; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Ideology; Political economy; Political science; History; Law; Economics; Economic growth; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.023265978349130353,"score_gpt":0.33979044158722677,"score_spread":0.3165244632380964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2750962442","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08437634,0.04554258,0.059003234,0.20255548,0.00201149,0.000084367835,0.00017855475,0.00015500477,0.606093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569413,0.0055562793,0.00755991,0.0052526263,0.00077874213,0.00006953514,0.000034934732,0.0000769069,0.023729658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969855,0.0015683793,0.000084727064,0.0004305523,0.0004855062,0.00044536113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971222,0.0017275624,0.00024322938,0.0003872306,0.00026740797,0.00025230975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046779155,0.00054284267,0.00067451055,0.0009818035,0.007326665,0.007899802,0.0013166205,0.003101607,0.0030946338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005414326,0.0003204959,0.00057114934,0.0011231337,0.052109852,0.006687512,0.004793704,0.0068626176,0.00038951213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020194034,0.0000014378242,0.00006356233,0.000009572875,0.0000013488457,0.0000308934,0.0019285601,0.00007409068,0.000015796462,0.996581,0.00056418305,0.0007274899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006608773,0.000005576823,0.00024928016,0.000059588478,0.000003487747,0.00005747727,0.0012624317,0.0004226889,0.000070760645,0.9468407,0.05100855,0.000012836941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10352429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10432317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10352429,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020507166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008411892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20584345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751532069","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1270","title":"Developers, the State, and the Politics of Private Property Rights","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Statute; Negotiation; Nonpossessory interest in land; Land law; Property rights; Political science; Private property; Land tenure; Land use; State (computer science); New institutionalism; Public administration; Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Law; Geography; Civil engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.010960572863882972,"score_gpt":0.23171164693312088,"score_spread":0.2207510740692379,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751532069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38908193,0.003311612,0.009482921,0.03220278,0.000071789626,0.0000506529,0.00007526796,0.00003268788,0.56569034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992669,0.00031219257,0.0002017534,0.00014736824,0.000010020447,0.0000063653997,0.0000054718703,0.000003856615,0.006643969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812514,0.00084379147,0.000041808828,0.000165048,0.00034871753,0.00047545772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978962,0.0012160387,0.00028887665,0.0001679213,0.0001849373,0.00024598165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021446436,0.00011732721,0.00017055016,0.0008015106,0.0051678973,0.0075248196,0.0004750007,0.0010414039,0.0032033436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003571169,0.00021516965,0.0001122842,0.000909169,0.030093396,0.0021391434,0.002657655,0.0014837246,0.00012079929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007275774,0.0000058485516,0.0031237956,0.000012936695,0.0000035508494,0.00009658209,0.008283437,0.0008234078,0.00014678398,0.98314255,0.00069542683,0.0036584109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071260176,0.000046007444,0.033103257,0.00024600019,0.000043701115,0.00015410587,0.039592765,0.0046536275,0.0011689065,0.6655483,0.25532275,0.000049339444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23754255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.441308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23754255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026369233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016381467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47231984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751540023","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1263","title":"The Properties of Planning: An Evolving Landscape","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Scholarship; Corporate governance; Law and economics; Property rights; Law; Political science; Function (biology); Object (grammar); Property law; Sociology; Order (exchange); Epistemology; Business; Economics; Philosophy; Management","score_opus":0.053760351179483606,"score_gpt":0.36115950563449417,"score_spread":0.30739915445501054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751540023","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006630317,0.3889713,0.015565428,0.4055458,0.012947844,0.000027320713,0.00014617924,0.00019918541,0.16996661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3042829,0.5349953,0.015511169,0.044955987,0.051945433,0.00015006601,0.00030316104,0.0008230381,0.047032893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970651,0.0014707235,0.000116112686,0.0003451584,0.00071014924,0.00029268724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934895,0.004730934,0.0002850525,0.00036344782,0.00047470728,0.0006564012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045364546,0.0006815867,0.0011322497,0.004125933,0.006446508,0.02296767,0.0024705706,0.004999015,0.011572071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054786196,0.00072839286,0.0006157684,0.007409776,0.03623238,0.027294816,0.007307225,0.009500262,0.0010067342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015636779,0.000026054351,0.00036897924,0.0002811523,0.0000071225377,0.00011841577,0.0061506927,0.00048971816,0.00007843602,0.85759056,0.07342737,0.061445896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029473092,0.000016469323,0.00035830445,0.00055015145,0.000003854081,0.00017146737,0.005872873,0.00037172696,0.000048006026,0.19404015,0.7985459,0.000018097382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006441666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007403679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02296767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008744111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006720083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06344324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752532644","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1264","title":"Community, Property, and Human Rights: The Failure of Property-as-Respect","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Private property; Law and economics; Property law; Numerus clausus; Human rights; Political science; Law; Land law; Sociology; Business; Land tenure; Epistemology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.043043714012098916,"score_gpt":0.3476722668467948,"score_spread":0.3046285528346959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752532644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054151896,0.015457545,0.06464087,0.31202844,0.0009033388,0.000069179565,0.00008507228,0.000098231954,0.5525654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97156185,0.0029402303,0.0048157754,0.008855991,0.0005901351,0.00009208901,0.000021617732,0.000053525222,0.011068765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920378,0.004308399,0.00018205933,0.0010974364,0.0015028851,0.00087153364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989007,0.0071712183,0.000882978,0.0014794377,0.0007352945,0.0007241248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012420638,0.00035987623,0.0008228751,0.0016026343,0.0071439934,0.009575802,0.0019641137,0.0073955124,0.0059769885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015246088,0.00029649938,0.0006659177,0.0014786271,0.08561238,0.020237697,0.008980509,0.007836898,0.00063557824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017148332,0.0000023964665,0.000026279593,0.0000057840693,9.4012074e-7,0.000006248454,0.00039138354,0.00003322987,0.0000071331688,0.9979944,0.00041383962,0.0011166468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004973266,0.00000492064,0.000048341284,0.00002552701,0.0000013047703,0.000013648281,0.00037864505,0.00010719981,0.000028446222,0.9903875,0.008996397,0.0000030468946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00878813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006957922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012420638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069444203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006914223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06568742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752717888","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1265","title":"Revitalizing Land Use Law: Introductory Notes","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.052099636497167146,"score_gpt":0.3443510968078286,"score_spread":0.29225146031066146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752717888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063686837,0.045007348,0.02676512,0.592678,0.017258305,0.00030985055,0.000122748,0.00016330282,0.31132665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.306092,0.061543286,0.030138342,0.32037884,0.0223028,0.0012904968,0.0001686493,0.0003433269,0.25774232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99578947,0.002173734,0.00019467103,0.00040262868,0.00087382726,0.00056570844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605775,0.0029320002,0.0001453133,0.0002293714,0.0004508352,0.0001846996],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007327216,0.00093188055,0.00051420124,0.0016614271,0.0067209518,0.009502049,0.0025523845,0.014748423,0.0061891465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0108037,0.00040831455,0.0008861624,0.0012629649,0.019085469,0.01245082,0.0059287813,0.01983188,0.0014618462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003679537,0.000019642557,0.00005851715,0.000050548573,0.0000020954296,0.00013687897,0.0020605389,0.00022098089,0.0001102789,0.962851,0.029944014,0.004541827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073224196,0.000030497164,0.00021387494,0.0004295074,0.000003892837,0.00012514777,0.002881656,0.0003109975,0.00023265154,0.2954651,0.7002676,0.000031782518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019050539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019030642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019050539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0101776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00525241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.073843956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753386623","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1271","title":"Shared Path: Bridging Indigenous and Settler Notions of Urban Planning: An Annotated Interview with Carolyn King","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Negotiation; Human settlement; Settlement (finance); Power (physics); Transformative learning; Geography; Sociology; History; Political science; Archaeology; Law","score_opus":0.03376680703605232,"score_gpt":0.3428979553269156,"score_spread":0.30913114829086324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753386623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6201283,0.008685806,0.0039371387,0.17094497,0.0017188884,0.00027904118,0.00027578918,0.00014066932,0.19388936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94068116,0.0028051587,0.0015989625,0.0091565,0.00011039844,0.00016233124,0.00007555751,0.0001640619,0.04524586],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941704,0.003611274,0.00014084292,0.00041559563,0.0007313091,0.0009305789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937463,0.0035847398,0.00029361816,0.00017801404,0.00077718345,0.0014200187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049182544,0.0005370334,0.00071120594,0.001313884,0.038807884,0.0071145603,0.001888929,0.0035288655,0.006383746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008455064,0.0006731158,0.00032637478,0.001996837,0.022873823,0.0069369334,0.0068261144,0.008517647,0.00049692683],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004511628,0.000007932416,0.00029819758,0.000021418873,8.3026697e-7,0.00046758814,0.988951,0.000024307406,0.00008831575,0.0033067628,0.005426479,0.0014026265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.821601e-7,0.0000043192226,0.0003870176,0.000055197856,0.0000010603209,0.00011424561,0.9429298,0.00002939896,0.00002572963,0.000313423,0.05613026,0.000008740335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47777128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7253932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47777128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02967151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018517606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9499807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753914497","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1267","title":"Planning as Property: Uncovering the Hidden Racial Logic of a Municipal Nuisance By-law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Statutory law; Law; Indigenous; Property (philosophy); State (computer science); Identity (music); Political science; Property law; Power (physics); Law and economics; Sociology; Property rights; Politics","score_opus":0.03689614601650031,"score_gpt":0.35326902880745514,"score_spread":0.3163728827909548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753914497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44882697,0.0033397162,0.044313885,0.041273456,0.00018748236,0.000078686426,0.00009324527,0.00007663127,0.46180987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98868,0.0006067266,0.0019121886,0.0005468333,0.000024513374,0.000018362452,0.000013817075,0.000023841638,0.008173744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850357,0.0006738603,0.000026214208,0.00017175497,0.00026696475,0.00035765418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861467,0.00071985455,0.00019876682,0.00022928597,0.0001481726,0.000089161644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001912938,0.00021850191,0.00024332658,0.00093698653,0.011062349,0.007110348,0.0011123138,0.0017812779,0.0029693902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004457122,0.0002250253,0.00022923881,0.0016556784,0.045494623,0.0052414117,0.004001817,0.002063096,0.00016462455],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004599983,0.000003971686,0.0014219541,0.000014465997,0.0000020709326,0.00014094696,0.046129044,0.00017613969,0.00013205835,0.9466018,0.0012416925,0.0041313185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014825223,0.000030693245,0.009852286,0.00022712245,0.000024632018,0.00016978903,0.11377724,0.0016790106,0.0009562878,0.598442,0.2748023,0.000023727176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19362469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32599688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19362469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012892013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012011062,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38499528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796608016","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1303","title":"Issue 1: Feathers of Hope: Child Welfare Youth Forum","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Youth work; Work (physics); Welfare; Feather; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Public relations; Criminology; Media studies; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.029315481355880947,"score_gpt":0.3760253103004451,"score_spread":0.34670982894456415,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796608016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012475746,0.01208763,0.00094119663,0.6470179,0.17315838,0.001528045,0.0018111909,0.0011000833,0.14987981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09231605,0.011233923,0.0022919835,0.27985966,0.12287565,0.0029199566,0.0021895731,0.0011657166,0.4851475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966486,0.00067605503,0.00019740811,0.0002353082,0.0012418078,0.0010007843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869797,0.0040567257,0.0006684256,0.00036525787,0.0012782791,0.006651631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076072807,0.0010006307,0.00068494014,0.0015089134,0.015297374,0.00974172,0.0027087955,0.02077516,0.08728795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013709264,0.00065293256,0.00087291014,0.0011578773,0.0030288873,0.0071480456,0.011636459,0.014645539,0.014603171],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003125751,0.00014960869,0.0009997273,0.00026533284,0.000004297336,0.00058969687,0.002444095,0.000018794104,0.00030963862,0.0063973665,0.9698289,0.018961268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017647697,0.000029926301,0.0033760977,0.00040456626,0.0000039637075,0.00016562178,0.0025811633,0.000029396913,0.00015762798,0.00076739106,0.9924499,0.00001672121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049299835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013729873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08728795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027987517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009729923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29200727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796638899","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1301","title":"Issue 1: Caring Society v Canada: Neoliberalism, Social Reproduction, and Indigenous Child Welfare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Neoliberalism (international relations); Reproduction; Welfare; Social reproduction; Politics; Political science; Tribunal; Social Welfare; Social work; Government (linguistics); Sociology; Child care; Political economy; Economic growth; Social science; Law; Economics; Medicine","score_opus":0.019510292626329025,"score_gpt":0.30204294208430077,"score_spread":0.28253264945797174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796638899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029840058,0.022721276,0.00044881905,0.5988794,0.005325397,0.000101676735,0.00048664515,0.00004493662,0.34215182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45909038,0.0178757,0.0009396696,0.34857538,0.0034373736,0.00014186077,0.00027494185,0.00013881663,0.1695257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99219865,0.0006263279,0.00014410171,0.00062563294,0.0035146934,0.0028907093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99428505,0.0022654554,0.0003400504,0.00019586539,0.0017123409,0.0012012337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003899745,0.0003936058,0.0005776825,0.0013721975,0.038650308,0.015529026,0.003414273,0.013683845,0.011813727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0083789155,0.00035985568,0.0004836429,0.002798238,0.031220121,0.004234156,0.0050576967,0.014896522,0.00048724757],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013357748,0.00003982179,0.0017838718,0.0001462182,0.0000096499325,0.0003127695,0.023359945,0.000073353425,0.00013922213,0.7651558,0.19602571,0.012940166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021750464,0.000011925718,0.009287564,0.0006859665,0.000024936648,0.00019027578,0.029800596,0.000116890595,0.0002703766,0.03756689,0.9219381,0.00008481117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.978079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08955275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08955275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23755752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64975375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796934453","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1294","title":"Issue 1: Reimagining Child Welfare Systems in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Research in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare system; Welfare; Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Law","score_opus":0.03273261564435942,"score_gpt":0.3809233973006133,"score_spread":0.3481907816562539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796934453","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34514654,0.013436078,0.0017521781,0.4523474,0.0059711696,0.0014379943,0.0022903392,0.0004892895,0.177129],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7165258,0.009579161,0.004516322,0.11623376,0.00065566145,0.00035381282,0.0010791341,0.0002450617,0.15081131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842948,0.0009501073,0.00045100102,0.0006365231,0.006067835,0.007599706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774049,0.0025039664,0.000871738,0.00066405226,0.008817623,0.009737562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006719017,0.00039879963,0.00056498294,0.0022703046,0.034277707,0.013946665,0.0067286375,0.009715021,0.009859781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018297564,0.00081924483,0.00086243317,0.0037182183,0.0068546436,0.0026136232,0.0074534183,0.007751091,0.00049357844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018627825,0.0005719063,0.10403389,0.0012695983,0.00020590903,0.007110417,0.07476309,0.0025340957,0.0030669011,0.18769337,0.45879683,0.1597678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067913374,0.00008528561,0.104081504,0.00072529004,0.00007635626,0.0004550136,0.038434878,0.001032423,0.0007625813,0.0026551357,0.8514747,0.00014889616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99873227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72009164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27990836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.568667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83520424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797085390","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1299","title":"Issue 1: Giidosendiwag (We Walk Together): Creating Culturally Based Supports for Urban Indigenous Youth in Care","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Situated; Commission; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.02087793396164473,"score_gpt":0.3428938418709772,"score_spread":0.3220159079093325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797085390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31846073,0.00637514,0.0031713129,0.27008098,0.0038194393,0.0011589527,0.0005924598,0.00034387514,0.39599708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80346787,0.004994495,0.0052235196,0.02437648,0.00032814775,0.00060605997,0.00032796944,0.00022118293,0.16045421],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984573,0.00036613378,0.000041247757,0.00010410469,0.00037203397,0.00065909926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969606,0.00027535096,0.00012869306,0.0001178081,0.00033589272,0.0021816636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020102598,0.00019514294,0.00023674335,0.0003427818,0.023255108,0.005418115,0.0022805887,0.0023897567,0.015941309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038808435,0.00024792048,0.00032834534,0.00064642535,0.0063708895,0.0021305396,0.008969481,0.0030357202,0.0007856637],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050469218,0.0002214346,0.02571175,0.00060468505,0.000029832576,0.00401129,0.45001978,0.00015044339,0.0016161823,0.060217742,0.3192557,0.1381107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013567964,0.000042340875,0.018157009,0.0004359839,0.0000143742345,0.0002786105,0.20928666,0.000077858596,0.000210873,0.0019619388,0.7695006,0.000020286952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7727378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95998555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7727378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028819293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09036446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45720112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797101661","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1302","title":"Issue 1: “Reimagining” the Child Welfare System","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Children's Rights and Participation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Passions; Economic Justice; Welfare; Treaty; Dream; Political science; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.024902341586446414,"score_gpt":0.3443306166717743,"score_spread":0.3194282750853279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797101661","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020514498,0.005507335,0.0006862911,0.8601804,0.063931994,0.00012101806,0.00030436114,0.00026769083,0.06694936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026250342,0.0067036776,0.0015053772,0.7532129,0.034219448,0.00030809548,0.0004963923,0.00052400935,0.17677973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98993075,0.0018684043,0.00046769975,0.0006778781,0.0043051606,0.0027500512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98826396,0.0041457736,0.00064466987,0.0009670344,0.0027846778,0.0031938334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012427454,0.0010032577,0.00081510347,0.0012782284,0.011578575,0.01486661,0.0051827435,0.037071016,0.040739153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027891995,0.00063305965,0.0014613619,0.0013086699,0.0071624867,0.010517875,0.007998956,0.027033761,0.009174728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008137063,0.000046359764,0.0007412068,0.00009436346,0.0000084384665,0.00026807483,0.000993781,0.00003816888,0.00014236722,0.0450515,0.938427,0.0141806165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073728193,0.000011625264,0.0015353591,0.00025829105,0.000006915813,0.0000985735,0.00083694677,0.00003385667,0.00011978623,0.0031329805,0.9939422,0.000015922693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031968035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04694232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040739153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073384936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031093284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13628602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797183728","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1304","title":"Issue 1: Kokum’s House","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Global Maritime and Colonial Histories","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Architectural engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.019163708856350967,"score_gpt":0.3304624308015361,"score_spread":0.3112987219451851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797183728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058248015,0.007884257,0.000373046,0.10498861,0.065141834,0.00020640614,0.0013911403,0.00042341955,0.81376654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012712009,0.0012908968,0.00009150551,0.017052306,0.0024151606,0.000061020495,0.00026827774,0.00015043937,0.9659584],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992933,0.00009674994,0.000050405903,0.000098266595,0.00024484002,0.00021640897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992679,0.00013736617,0.000037259655,0.000082162645,0.00026333323,0.00021188984],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000819278,0.0005090277,0.0003604567,0.0005924569,0.006755233,0.0054150787,0.0010050826,0.00682423,0.30131108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003383809,0.00033815877,0.00044552307,0.0006844286,0.0013631916,0.0037455256,0.003206672,0.0051152455,0.08768148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013165368,0.000019732634,0.00018879547,0.0000794427,0.0000030415474,0.0002784389,0.00039566567,0.000011282693,0.00012499974,0.010902064,0.97639173,0.011591719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016506962,0.0000025761055,0.000557118,0.000054384116,9.35188e-7,0.00004791926,0.00039527006,0.000008027596,0.000050510942,0.00029237074,0.9985863,0.0000030271208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009605922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019533733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30131108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002310117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003266184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99659497},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797204018","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1295","title":"Issue 1: Reimagining Overrepresentation Research: Critical Reflections on Researching the Overrepresentation of First Nations Children in the Child Welfare System","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Construct (python library); Ambiguity; Welfare; Sociology; Political science; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12192092594690311,"score_gpt":0.49606971133219835,"score_spread":0.3741487853852952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797204018","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06369647,0.010679442,0.010337656,0.8830962,0.0027255088,0.00021254228,0.000097383585,0.00003531887,0.029119529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80387616,0.009118539,0.009278898,0.16508746,0.0021138017,0.0006741885,0.00007008763,0.0002019422,0.009578872],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.80500215,0.13603278,0.0071762768,0.013034487,0.025526516,0.013227709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5121961,0.42797938,0.011853971,0.011826593,0.03225592,0.003888039],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.26055664,0.0007997936,0.0022724636,0.0064878087,0.045825504,0.03767186,0.0102293305,0.021209596,0.0030727466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28020898,0.0011562681,0.0012281348,0.011233539,0.16201933,0.037494686,0.021311188,0.036848646,0.00024824167],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014852537,0.00001704982,0.0021925888,0.00021816549,0.000009780072,0.00044891285,0.6305215,0.00009408943,0.00012623609,0.34264088,0.011638883,0.012077136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011291608,0.000022372058,0.0030495878,0.0019383102,0.000025919144,0.0003751579,0.7521271,0.00023112963,0.0006087911,0.0805684,0.16094291,0.00009901714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.29805464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32149595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29805464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068007745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.123047635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9118653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2797477049","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1298","title":"Issue 1: Anti-Black Racism, Bio-Power, and Governmentality: Deconstructing the Suffering of Black Families Involved with Child Welfare","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Work Education and Practice","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Racism; Sociology; Gender studies; Welfare; Colonialism; Narrative; Power (physics); White (mutation); White supremacy; Political science; Politics; Law; Art","score_opus":0.020512505493736607,"score_gpt":0.33453003662727776,"score_spread":0.31401753113354114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2797477049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44350857,0.016975844,0.0053680195,0.33638862,0.0037871706,0.00016623735,0.00019697742,0.00008699721,0.1935216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511204,0.0077702906,0.001572286,0.013555389,0.0006402031,0.00014030661,0.00006188484,0.00013916192,0.025000116],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976673,0.0013033753,0.00006297527,0.00013033766,0.00043585824,0.0004001068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967038,0.0020730288,0.00033616522,0.0001926758,0.0003466157,0.0003477746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041787997,0.00042550964,0.00041199202,0.0011731929,0.02539825,0.011999427,0.0016463051,0.0043409145,0.0040112934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005203488,0.0002831646,0.00036135523,0.0015184192,0.04724695,0.0066363364,0.008506692,0.0068328027,0.00022843873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008126372,0.00001322903,0.0012836624,0.00010082565,0.0000038291496,0.00031975334,0.8920435,0.000032401127,0.00029585056,0.08936141,0.009513028,0.007024448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004332682,0.00001159791,0.0051834085,0.0006348586,0.000014413585,0.00038361433,0.71198446,0.00007312092,0.00036421817,0.013798477,0.26752186,0.000025661835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12776312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32462668,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12776312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019749807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026567886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25403893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2798070126","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1297","title":"Issue 1: “It’s Better Late Than Never”: A Community-Based HIV Research and Training Response to Supporting Mothers Living with HIV Who Have Child Welfare Involvement (Part I)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Lakehead University; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Oppression; Poverty; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); Focus group; Welfare; Qualitative research; Domestic violence; Stigma (botany); Social work; Social Welfare; Sociology; Psychology; Public relations; Medicine; Political science; Poison control; Environmental health; Family medicine; Suicide prevention; Psychiatry; Social science","score_opus":0.13137473829170876,"score_gpt":0.4541492256989205,"score_spread":0.32277448740721176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2798070126","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78379244,0.0011240618,0.0012041035,0.19044493,0.0022885352,0.003082621,0.00008205593,0.000106770836,0.01787456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9294059,0.0019610284,0.0046716477,0.036109433,0.00063285715,0.0026903367,0.00008460085,0.000055351837,0.024388842],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505556,0.0030788828,0.0001734724,0.00023200113,0.0005191465,0.00094087614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98832977,0.0038008087,0.0010127329,0.00050604815,0.0009897618,0.0053608734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144861685,0.00025618126,0.00037268744,0.000548674,0.018457238,0.0030805098,0.0026581376,0.004498371,0.006180395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021041768,0.000675303,0.00034951672,0.00043509976,0.0063833497,0.0030288757,0.008634899,0.0057487777,0.00045921595],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080955,0.0014778766,0.014643647,0.00055408984,0.000014219005,0.002840004,0.828387,0.000058282963,0.0033984806,0.0027700462,0.04731004,0.09846536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095057425,0.00073934277,0.021335473,0.000637164,0.000017432429,0.0005826678,0.858467,0.00010891488,0.0006633404,0.0010117169,0.11630792,0.000034022432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02966056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09316549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02966056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007665047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041829534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0766111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2830013","doi":"10.1016/0165-4608(88)90194-x","title":"Age discrimination and social benefits: the long retreat from Tétreault-Gadoury?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Cancer Institute","keywords":"Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Demographic economics; Economics","score_opus":0.053735649476628955,"score_gpt":0.4022646182884308,"score_spread":0.34852896881180184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2830013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94358826,0.0048890025,0.00019083083,0.031982396,0.00031164,0.00000999412,0.00007008487,0.000008373494,0.018949362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951616,0.0005616266,0.000061801824,0.0016018429,0.00012278809,0.000004057175,0.00001552688,0.0000026806038,0.0024680353],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995504,0.00012777444,0.0000104859255,0.0000442467,0.000068389796,0.00019870393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876344,0.0001623074,0.00024469645,0.00006645765,0.00011317082,0.00064986426],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011943994,0.00014086657,0.00026078572,0.00043660298,0.0017015517,0.0016659565,0.00032219774,0.0015773351,0.0050909976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036339783,0.00008029171,0.00019653313,0.0003016683,0.0020200394,0.0015055786,0.0018018202,0.0014571423,0.000323103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012239838,0.0009852307,0.49535015,0.00015279495,0.00012989966,0.0058796317,0.036716208,0.00016053385,0.0037694597,0.076577134,0.011800921,0.36725414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061236635,0.00040784982,0.8702287,0.00022232831,0.00004943898,0.0038166703,0.038634267,0.00031142303,0.0006058936,0.027081802,0.05853114,0.000049232145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048196935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012561387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012983023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009845912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017031133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891339806","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1315","title":"Domestic Violence and International Child Abduction at the Border of Canadian Family and Refugee Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Refugee; Domestic violence; Convention; Law; Political science; Refugee law; Family law; International law; Criminology; Sociology; Poison control; Human factors and ergonomics; Medicine; Environmental health","score_opus":0.02154836251343113,"score_gpt":0.37272162442778695,"score_spread":0.3511732619143558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891339806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70133984,0.010719312,0.0006467021,0.05513809,0.00026980942,0.000051329607,0.00014408793,0.00001693869,0.2316739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920814,0.0022502716,0.00015809266,0.0014995267,0.000017943199,0.0000081786775,0.00002256722,0.0000056607437,0.0039561554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99580836,0.0006123385,0.00007854656,0.00022439599,0.001111352,0.0021649823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661994,0.0007393677,0.00057926256,0.000092347,0.0010323822,0.0009365417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021913084,0.00022536863,0.00034244635,0.002168509,0.024134211,0.006704946,0.0014749469,0.0023136595,0.0055067223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009840615,0.00031042783,0.00035605775,0.0030577034,0.021387093,0.0020595803,0.006423804,0.0032553247,0.00011946089],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006215895,0.00009787288,0.10645719,0.00015782939,0.000046286226,0.0021729637,0.3494009,0.00052789674,0.0004182743,0.47509313,0.018202344,0.047363188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025678097,0.000047863323,0.26162127,0.0011396586,0.000075075295,0.0011242488,0.5742472,0.000467876,0.00024606334,0.018664598,0.14219981,0.00014072482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9922718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99635243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1115522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1115522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1408333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80937165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2895866880","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1310","title":"A Current Assessment of Legal Aid in Ontario","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Government of Canada; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Legal service; Service provider; Government (linguistics); Poverty; Business; Per capita; Economic Justice; Certificate; Service (business); Inflation (cosmology); Duty; Public economics; Economic growth; Economics; Political science; Law; Marketing; Sociology","score_opus":0.07901487436676469,"score_gpt":0.47999810925427805,"score_spread":0.40098323488751336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2895866880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7035281,0.010234241,0.0006295811,0.02067668,0.00020071867,0.00024307908,0.016692545,0.00012545534,0.24766955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96186286,0.007211893,0.0007042942,0.0010235015,0.000053822085,0.000066057124,0.003486431,0.000025123005,0.025566101],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952821,0.00019173988,0.00021528227,0.00017456317,0.0029872241,0.0011492057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9878687,0.0005928738,0.0016640072,0.0001892502,0.007139283,0.002545824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014828361,0.00025062938,0.00038725254,0.0046917764,0.0051153502,0.0038180996,0.0012613342,0.00046971312,0.00888086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007146957,0.00031367686,0.00046467126,0.01100817,0.0017091451,0.0012520696,0.0018893274,0.0005291195,0.00058343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001583219,0.000080857746,0.7907175,0.0013344787,0.0001629631,0.0006802399,0.017443601,0.0010827751,0.0006483263,0.016515523,0.054034423,0.11714102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011992199,0.000038341674,0.8383399,0.00035805168,0.000053239863,0.00016516086,0.014402954,0.0005308555,0.00013149112,0.00054825336,0.14538147,0.00003827591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99470264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99802494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11924732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11924732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14283524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86520386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902245668","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1330","title":"Ongoing Debates about Gambling Regulation In Brazil: Between Current News and Prospective Laws, An Uncertain Future Ahead","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Brazilian Legal Issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04510703950683083,"score_gpt":0.41571814652705424,"score_spread":0.37061110702022343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902245668","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04455508,0.038388725,0.0015772075,0.87547565,0.0015868437,0.000020078005,0.00019412438,0.000045145065,0.038157094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8592509,0.03377094,0.0019229443,0.096625164,0.0018856631,0.000058812413,0.00015924088,0.00007513189,0.0062511647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932655,0.002752155,0.00040228435,0.0006738708,0.001983447,0.000922809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97736824,0.015031706,0.0022308305,0.0008567761,0.0029229356,0.0015895454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012874203,0.0002593968,0.0005839151,0.0016286109,0.0052049933,0.008013646,0.0018026009,0.0056181233,0.0031112067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03678182,0.00048953574,0.0005624507,0.0023646285,0.014593773,0.0065573375,0.0027033119,0.007976347,0.00029193258],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006826126,0.00007527042,0.011229228,0.0013289745,0.00005476431,0.0013163782,0.07439538,0.00047947085,0.0016030219,0.74401957,0.069524154,0.095905416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000372489,0.000059443362,0.03244202,0.00587833,0.00008281141,0.0009537397,0.06976212,0.0011295972,0.0009103781,0.15687633,0.7317003,0.00016764253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08304728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12156873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08304728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011035568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01662613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16512775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2902825928","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1328","title":"Fifty Years of Legal Gambling in Canada: So What?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lottery; CLARITY; Law; Political science; Politics; Criminology; Sociology","score_opus":0.08494422137818691,"score_gpt":0.41070080845354723,"score_spread":0.3257565870753603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902825928","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25600588,0.13269848,0.0005475206,0.4977496,0.0061600734,0.00010344273,0.003447307,0.000093340765,0.10319437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79315877,0.104552895,0.0005414208,0.059003048,0.0013153089,0.00006715324,0.0019388212,0.00008564908,0.03933692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971021,0.00020221654,0.000085091975,0.00019875329,0.0011847746,0.0012271611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99325025,0.00048020564,0.00048975815,0.00010227483,0.0022648086,0.0034127869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018129618,0.00030432883,0.00062031526,0.0033980184,0.014972275,0.007996088,0.0015942012,0.0020777944,0.0093042925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005531095,0.0004359654,0.0004504094,0.0066010063,0.00873371,0.003578,0.0024858604,0.0056537986,0.0006298279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016692127,0.0002700697,0.15501295,0.0009640167,0.00011147782,0.0012206103,0.08260443,0.00037233307,0.00033595655,0.08961214,0.42886746,0.24046163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027970078,0.000052682204,0.3518154,0.0024973967,0.00007861792,0.0004916827,0.09670438,0.00037904896,0.00013569405,0.0063464018,0.54128164,0.0001890261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9983181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11462683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11462683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19069071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83167976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2905482341","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1326","title":"All About That Place: The Curious Case of Bingo Liberalisation in Brazil","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Entertainment; Language change; Liberalization; Sociology; Sociality; Political science; Law; Art","score_opus":0.10707996154023208,"score_gpt":0.45216737938508406,"score_spread":0.345087417844852,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905482341","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75102025,0.00274753,0.0029068757,0.10426709,0.00031898223,0.00011571284,0.000060576513,0.00003414618,0.13852887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99168956,0.0006130604,0.0002826936,0.00385823,0.000029962894,0.000026224228,0.000007736594,0.000011329255,0.0034812053],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973417,0.0012020171,0.00006516916,0.00025093806,0.00031783953,0.00082238636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976024,0.001042126,0.00035108396,0.00020969761,0.00018403529,0.0006105805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023421238,0.00028706968,0.0004945938,0.0007329391,0.015137487,0.0042482223,0.001315679,0.0044835126,0.0031938655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006299387,0.0003866638,0.00052164274,0.0009691862,0.019158682,0.0042093154,0.0075918525,0.0063895984,0.00016498174],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038429494,0.00009323263,0.009764823,0.00013921593,0.000017250184,0.009552435,0.46797702,0.00030664334,0.0013739374,0.49150774,0.004545011,0.014684298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000357478,0.00008869724,0.020677004,0.0012546481,0.000038502225,0.006094314,0.6547134,0.0015164356,0.00086260063,0.10723096,0.20736061,0.00012705935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11460852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24875616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11460852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008795215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006674487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22788286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908254244","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1322","title":"Law, Judges and Authorized Gambling in Italy: A Tale of Contradictions","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Business; Consumer protection; Law; Service (business); Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.10670524164495518,"score_gpt":0.43773418969615957,"score_spread":0.3310289480512044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908254244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14340411,0.021675719,0.0040884963,0.35407788,0.0014594138,0.000067493296,0.000087610606,0.000090568734,0.47504866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9259554,0.0056497916,0.0012428481,0.04898196,0.0028731518,0.000088908906,0.000054368677,0.00008639433,0.01506713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98726034,0.006054015,0.0005001695,0.0011051892,0.003308453,0.0017718537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899385,0.0068576224,0.0011632502,0.0006424703,0.00072460563,0.00067356933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013924721,0.00036208695,0.0005764532,0.0034989584,0.0089184875,0.011563331,0.0019141947,0.0068749,0.003286747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024275335,0.000639062,0.0005615649,0.002886806,0.049014434,0.0050619505,0.005555386,0.0084628025,0.0006285964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026887847,0.00006251994,0.0051690047,0.00011760964,0.000014094023,0.00060077984,0.023930572,0.00021157686,0.00020545334,0.9246796,0.024247434,0.020734534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013093783,0.00010776272,0.059659123,0.0020064425,0.000093517636,0.001362956,0.030909302,0.0015547932,0.0005407017,0.5280579,0.37537485,0.00020171606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033106897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05833007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033106897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01063859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072763255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07718879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29095352","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1050","title":"Flexibility and Feminization: The New Ontario Employment Standards Act","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Feminization (sociology); Flexibility (engineering); Business; Labour economics; Sociology; Gender studies; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.03766172758626456,"score_gpt":0.3683604813301207,"score_spread":0.33069875374385616,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29095352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13277344,0.0062714675,0.0017898245,0.33452237,0.0015041275,0.0003658005,0.0016267189,0.0001064738,0.52103984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5323153,0.0029592677,0.002812626,0.057929512,0.0007379805,0.00048321942,0.0004541643,0.0001204534,0.40218753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983021,0.0018815269,0.00063886854,0.00094804785,0.0078096306,0.0057008844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887714,0.0032818352,0.00092974154,0.0007415593,0.003254562,0.0030209704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009878582,0.0005187219,0.0006158339,0.0015888428,0.017236508,0.010139845,0.0031012723,0.01263165,0.0065128505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020213358,0.0011676396,0.00088090624,0.0022682347,0.014885995,0.0033437014,0.005813651,0.007902811,0.000615159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019978706,0.00008780681,0.012536269,0.00015670912,0.00004838639,0.0005109376,0.036341503,0.0018218796,0.0012450175,0.69402915,0.22502996,0.0279926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085243955,0.00003872725,0.057215344,0.0003116745,0.00004398881,0.00007571473,0.014265096,0.0005435958,0.00031698716,0.02094491,0.9059777,0.00018098559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9833673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12952411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12952411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23563781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9397676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2911722754","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1313","title":"Physicians, Nurse Practitioners and ODSP Applications: Towards a New Model of Partnership with Community Legal Clinics","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blame; General partnership; Health professionals; Health care; Work (physics); Nursing; Test (biology); Order (exchange); Legal profession; Task (project management); Public relations; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Business; Law; Psychiatry; Management","score_opus":0.10815991247699112,"score_gpt":0.4601460141389525,"score_spread":0.35198610166196137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2911722754","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20886636,0.0013333207,0.040408295,0.45488447,0.0011589462,0.0005391975,0.00003309452,0.00026165458,0.29251468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94709545,0.0007783468,0.014697808,0.0145683475,0.00019780165,0.00035531895,0.000020144254,0.00006466011,0.022222139],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9519045,0.036901787,0.0006576131,0.0019667442,0.0038645365,0.004704848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9442371,0.01599913,0.0030261273,0.0016198126,0.004513421,0.030604508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026244618,0.0004130152,0.00032106045,0.0020886906,0.035306834,0.026696933,0.004640566,0.008549648,0.0074842605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030971535,0.0010997149,0.00043267047,0.0015219961,0.035651106,0.019957028,0.031559743,0.010571715,0.0013869156],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005270482,0.0006304225,0.015104613,0.00013767697,0.000014894913,0.002893933,0.6101298,0.00042425736,0.0005309082,0.27540982,0.03255573,0.062115293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006474737,0.00022216924,0.0047785994,0.00052467437,0.000012127501,0.0015758735,0.67441976,0.0019202288,0.00021262668,0.084132954,0.23206066,0.00007566104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03589831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09028018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03589831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01655851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07864338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13879651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2912849018","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1321","title":"Risk, Charity, and Boundary Disputes: The Liberalisation and Commercialisation of Online Bingo in the European Union","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Liberalization; European union; Order (exchange); Business; Profit (economics); Corporate governance; Reading (process); Market economy; Political economy; Law and economics; Political science; Economics; Law; International trade; Microeconomics; Finance","score_opus":0.10505654428950473,"score_gpt":0.41385371332328114,"score_spread":0.3087971690337764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2912849018","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8677372,0.0019309057,0.0029203028,0.013453707,0.000091594935,0.000015999434,0.00002111978,0.000020329684,0.11380891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973333,0.00017969827,0.00015820612,0.00060821034,0.000013807757,0.000004491696,0.0000049084315,0.000005518519,0.0016919982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959816,0.0023623717,0.00013090766,0.00035647096,0.0004103331,0.0007583316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99333256,0.003998212,0.0011720109,0.0005016098,0.00033616243,0.000659348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005364357,0.00012885172,0.000269639,0.0008875157,0.0045943237,0.00849468,0.00081306824,0.003047435,0.0033519333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011009666,0.00026110417,0.00030628077,0.001086614,0.017903138,0.004995781,0.006516054,0.0037859213,0.00020419301],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018408835,0.00020011628,0.02756404,0.000065199514,0.00002439199,0.00073228433,0.097010024,0.0013662339,0.0004681489,0.8266316,0.0034859981,0.042267907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010021416,0.00032369493,0.17982513,0.0015295896,0.00006316198,0.0014632196,0.1986383,0.005719113,0.0012091761,0.4025544,0.20835428,0.00021972296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010906366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016695416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010906366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004386229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001968061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03182447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917351143","doi":"","title":"Learning, Teaching & Practising Systemic Advocacy in Legal Clinics: A Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Sociology; Psychology; Communication","score_opus":0.04070611120915998,"score_gpt":0.44216053812495226,"score_spread":0.4014544269157923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917351143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021947468,0.0023088502,0.0023241378,0.94546306,0.00082983647,0.0000396376,0.000010798591,0.000020426369,0.027055824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8385113,0.00491504,0.0037015267,0.14166103,0.0018902008,0.00021603337,0.000013046843,0.00008765208,0.009004138],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9318611,0.05608994,0.0008131018,0.0018677537,0.0029564772,0.006411599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87057686,0.10286102,0.0036568346,0.0014665583,0.0036469542,0.017791796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.089473575,0.00060217356,0.0008060533,0.0022630126,0.028459953,0.035893977,0.0045892824,0.033581022,0.012290113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07275813,0.0009010728,0.000657832,0.0018129236,0.0715067,0.03681663,0.020273706,0.035437025,0.0011016042],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006378418,0.0004449129,0.002424631,0.00040553612,0.00001490336,0.0004950081,0.5503903,0.00021308914,0.00037993005,0.35981688,0.036750987,0.04860009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007514382,0.00012913263,0.001603835,0.0014145602,0.00001463776,0.0003295917,0.6755793,0.00053859636,0.00035805037,0.12448503,0.195407,0.00006506524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013599072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020726915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089473575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019067945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043942902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47318715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2919810910","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1314","title":"The Disability Tax Credit: Exploring Attitudes, Perceptions, and Beliefs About Disability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Medical model of disability; Perception; Disability benefits; Meaning (existential); Interpretation (philosophy); Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Public economics; Social psychology; Political science; Actuarial science; Economics; Law; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.05433885309137197,"score_gpt":0.3558586436122912,"score_spread":0.3015197905209192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2919810910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99110353,0.0001890397,0.00013683696,0.0019539113,0.000018083138,0.000012762011,0.000019115652,9.741375e-7,0.006565729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99858105,0.0002698401,0.00006065236,0.00037259943,0.0000112774005,0.000015070177,0.000013709572,0.0000010506046,0.00067474024],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996472,0.0019128355,0.000103722065,0.00013116075,0.0007547593,0.00062553515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906843,0.0048515317,0.0020957207,0.00022339592,0.00093053596,0.00121461],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064994213,0.00020439326,0.0002499774,0.0015528937,0.0038089587,0.0038063957,0.00047531645,0.000935914,0.0028871805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014015813,0.00016851549,0.00027462823,0.00096002076,0.005136667,0.003166245,0.0028661299,0.0026968084,0.00022120771],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051130566,0.0005267417,0.38909805,0.000061361825,0.000027236574,0.00021905039,0.5591334,0.00012670878,0.0003436437,0.011496525,0.0021315399,0.03678462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054449815,0.000112369875,0.1117326,0.00014818953,0.000010221841,0.00014129991,0.87737894,0.00020356872,0.00011148542,0.0018920483,0.008243198,0.000020555772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021724837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02603461,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031691242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003034814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043196797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920071827","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1329","title":"Playing Bingo with Mum - and Dad!","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Sociology; Local community; Psychology; Media studies; Advertising; Public relations; Political science; Business; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.08844580374561221,"score_gpt":0.4234090248628866,"score_spread":0.3349632211172744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920071827","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03262324,0.0045383773,0.0027346474,0.101632975,0.031175114,0.00041632573,0.0028390368,0.005826317,0.81821406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035232034,0.0011843182,0.0010419823,0.019833617,0.0010778754,0.00012809654,0.0004268315,0.00044718487,0.9406281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996929,0.000054961005,0.0000071550467,0.000036586338,0.000077040946,0.00013144674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973797,0.00005549792,0.000054677224,0.000056233675,0.00020833832,0.0022455254],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040348616,0.00087849685,0.00063658395,0.00051161356,0.006239638,0.0020622036,0.0007849453,0.0015600289,0.46184134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019295905,0.0004946379,0.000388342,0.00024303234,0.000916095,0.0029756718,0.0041951463,0.004156909,0.2540093],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040235267,0.00009928748,0.0007979682,0.000037283968,0.0000032434743,0.00036226318,0.0010998342,0.000007669631,0.000162775,0.0006778096,0.97621024,0.02050134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019891493,0.00014529069,0.0025374854,0.00012344544,0.0000058883543,0.0021670922,0.0069504525,0.0000427891,0.00017814786,0.00045213482,0.9873425,0.00003483892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003997285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016022267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46184134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043227818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049937126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.767618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2924755370","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1345","title":"Issue 2: Tax, Race, and Child Poverty: The Case for Improving the Canada Child Benefit Program","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Poverty; Racialization; Child poverty; Race (biology); Indigenous; Welfare; Political science; Economic growth; Sociology; Economics; Gender studies","score_opus":0.009685618873354646,"score_gpt":0.2782486917139486,"score_spread":0.268563072840594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2924755370","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032754533,0.010664249,0.00036599982,0.8946596,0.0018711386,0.00011431449,0.00047514096,0.000036848993,0.05905823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5771146,0.017162137,0.0031304331,0.32992527,0.0019028258,0.00020483033,0.0003660149,0.0001442546,0.07004969],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992046,0.001049756,0.00013924758,0.00030940693,0.0028945885,0.0035610686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97826695,0.0043668947,0.0009770467,0.0004939872,0.006171211,0.009723878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066409116,0.00030193676,0.00071518985,0.0014959133,0.01956791,0.011111906,0.0038183047,0.009260919,0.0113402875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024508707,0.00036159452,0.00090538705,0.0022363618,0.0076720617,0.0035934213,0.0038164717,0.008012767,0.0004097172],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001232127,0.00028546443,0.07720878,0.00039427725,0.00008381655,0.00074557593,0.008515446,0.00091744715,0.00035277018,0.24023938,0.56406754,0.10706629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008531581,0.000072110815,0.11326715,0.0020655585,0.00020621957,0.00039941838,0.022380602,0.0013303526,0.00052761403,0.016970571,0.842529,0.00016607132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98532224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99307585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102710366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.102710366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3710609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74521935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927540772","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1325","title":"Beyond the Figure of the Problem Gambler: Locating Race and Sovereignty Struggles in Everyday Cultural Spaces of Gambling","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Governmentality; Sovereignty; Biopower; Sociology; Entitlement (fair division); Indigenous; Neoliberalism (international relations); Politics; Scholarship; Gender studies; Political economy; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07265644801839552,"score_gpt":0.39923771071595615,"score_spread":0.3265812626975606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927540772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9103151,0.0015514637,0.0036262337,0.017613692,0.000105915875,0.000013013985,0.000009364848,0.0000149845055,0.066750355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978574,0.00034546168,0.0002899559,0.00041640678,0.000021091048,0.0000050304698,0.0000023375103,0.000008788872,0.0010535859],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978028,0.0015411535,0.000028470042,0.0001571828,0.00017549447,0.00029493598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985702,0.0007863242,0.00021657642,0.00009682811,0.00007959806,0.00025051073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002690405,0.0003038215,0.00037328553,0.0016448739,0.011008072,0.0074151508,0.0008551555,0.0017423051,0.0024157544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003628559,0.00026751903,0.00020379313,0.0009721418,0.0677784,0.007747299,0.0072638504,0.0044657863,0.00013697038],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000127377725,0.000017779923,0.001907881,0.000020772803,0.0000027687352,0.00026100507,0.8568837,0.000028847442,0.00018310035,0.13615201,0.0004439812,0.00408542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046633527,0.00002638701,0.0052324496,0.00016718332,0.000008951772,0.00042455413,0.91197044,0.00028881204,0.00019934027,0.06114949,0.020510044,0.000017617982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01870529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025908161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01870529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036715285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002627126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03719282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2927743958","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1344","title":"Issue 2: Imagining a Community-Led, Multi-Service Delivery Model for Ontario Child Welfare: A Framework for Collaboration Among African Canadian Community Partners","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Restructuring; Welfare; Service delivery framework; Government (linguistics); Social Welfare; Economic growth; Community service; Public relations; Political science; Service (business); Sociology; Business; Economics; Marketing","score_opus":0.07597918330054897,"score_gpt":0.4273454396025108,"score_spread":0.35136625630196183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2927743958","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037799843,0.0053579365,0.013258225,0.713183,0.0013735952,0.0008310758,0.00021621496,0.00015994698,0.2278203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8327479,0.007319795,0.043572776,0.038189292,0.0003931062,0.00092101947,0.00013902238,0.00018350623,0.07653356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98204386,0.006986666,0.00035741032,0.00085885014,0.0042736745,0.005479477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890638,0.001552929,0.00054270565,0.00035478926,0.0030369358,0.0054488303],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012723589,0.0007952592,0.00037508944,0.0020473308,0.047835134,0.021778718,0.004543743,0.009107671,0.0057666157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010903089,0.0006212397,0.00072304165,0.0024494857,0.03626564,0.006639565,0.009262992,0.008147358,0.00048092622],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032319243,0.00009239643,0.0047673504,0.0003354827,0.000019624065,0.0013437499,0.13689226,0.0012260563,0.0006054772,0.7563722,0.072033376,0.026279615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038855545,0.00005203053,0.004768276,0.001162661,0.000031605276,0.00037368422,0.26411116,0.001939496,0.00028591312,0.050606593,0.6765164,0.00011334185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9818149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25819045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25819045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5088235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86039394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2935821001","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1323","title":"A Tale of Two Casinos: Unequal Spaces of Local Governance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Local governance; Work (physics); Downtown; Political science; Public administration; Sociology; Local government; Management; Economics; Geography; Engineering","score_opus":0.07219691508155758,"score_gpt":0.4351783135729661,"score_spread":0.36298139849140854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2935821001","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41973907,0.005006922,0.015863596,0.0924998,0.00052936334,0.00010968721,0.00019110607,0.000121795965,0.46593872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98899454,0.00032674544,0.0006617545,0.0008815323,0.00003232849,0.000021217524,0.00001745945,0.00002282843,0.009041659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930322,0.0042975657,0.00008771537,0.00068646943,0.0008072566,0.001088743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589705,0.0015471402,0.00030148056,0.0007393982,0.00045818288,0.0010568516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040411646,0.00050910434,0.00040072703,0.0013385804,0.024931291,0.014124684,0.0012512506,0.0025965453,0.005878978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061658146,0.00035652393,0.0003630849,0.001662181,0.06426357,0.0072525195,0.008379661,0.0032547228,0.00034830876],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005748351,0.000009571634,0.0028362104,0.00006815823,0.000016151818,0.00065219897,0.21649863,0.0005756781,0.00044108173,0.7621825,0.008809126,0.007853244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037736194,0.000066793415,0.011509897,0.00039514413,0.00006188963,0.0005003149,0.4502318,0.0012843295,0.00082342466,0.16572812,0.36923966,0.00012094922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3006352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40647775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3006352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034319714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009652045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5977706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2940978286","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1327","title":"First Nations Gaming in Canada: Gauging Past and Ongoing Development","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Revenue; Negotiation; Lottery; Nova scotia; Sovereignty; Political science; Economic growth; Business; Law; Public administration; Finance; Economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.06520517162578966,"score_gpt":0.3729215595590984,"score_spread":0.30771638793330874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2940978286","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6336156,0.05945065,0.0011282477,0.095413044,0.0005387432,0.00018490443,0.016301436,0.00021158761,0.19315575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96335566,0.021470716,0.0010050287,0.0015741884,0.00006958942,0.00002984359,0.0022688233,0.00002622519,0.0101999],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967487,0.00016399879,0.000104142826,0.00018960908,0.001672196,0.0011214796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98628205,0.0007281738,0.0010355182,0.00016535584,0.0092475265,0.002541351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020655133,0.00055247,0.00039589228,0.008796313,0.008164037,0.008778172,0.0018357937,0.0010430262,0.0033573937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057560885,0.00033573672,0.00042610752,0.017311528,0.004144108,0.0031722817,0.002450052,0.0023832358,0.00024441545],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019319347,0.00019348903,0.567427,0.0011295744,0.00014813957,0.00077012455,0.0310994,0.001891606,0.00057774823,0.0740586,0.07983753,0.2426736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010059357,0.000065080945,0.71168095,0.0011942275,0.000096540316,0.00022920224,0.056279182,0.0025973269,0.0006350599,0.0033894677,0.22368516,0.00013774692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99774736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99898404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21629462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21629462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2059442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90898716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941199743","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1331","title":"\"I've always been outspoken on what I think can be improved\": An Interview with Dr. Garry J. Smith","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Psychology; Media studies; Criminology; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11684170794780335,"score_gpt":0.42002901064364967,"score_spread":0.3031873026958463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941199743","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049986146,0.00525595,0.0019541935,0.9256594,0.0041359137,0.00020240595,0.00009257316,0.00006653217,0.01264693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44507313,0.007589031,0.0047213966,0.49946663,0.0019072347,0.0007792678,0.00007292764,0.000202321,0.04018802],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.980944,0.013928561,0.00029510361,0.00080126047,0.002267534,0.0017634969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778913,0.010727299,0.0010930513,0.00035160917,0.004540098,0.0053967186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014378442,0.00091313076,0.0010887177,0.0013061882,0.028979192,0.005477061,0.0024613405,0.011476638,0.0027148642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037170712,0.0014068278,0.00078760285,0.0014078163,0.016641708,0.007520141,0.0042463955,0.033390753,0.0009766918],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049638482,0.00006582875,0.00088106963,0.00011687364,0.000010316359,0.0021540895,0.70280427,0.00010635906,0.0008003138,0.008650193,0.27780026,0.0065607675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013812541,0.00005718749,0.0012211434,0.0004574604,0.000009384509,0.0013262182,0.67967236,0.00024336945,0.00032510902,0.0023750216,0.3142097,0.00008922253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10040888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1145702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10040888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014427185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01493846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19964886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2941394133","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1320","title":"Regulation and Resistance in Canadian Bingo Halls: A Socio-Legal Account","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resistance (ecology); Speculation; Profit (economics); Happening; Cash; Sociology; Public relations; Advertising; Political science; Business; Economics; History","score_opus":0.055050130790874396,"score_gpt":0.3935478134311602,"score_spread":0.3384976826402858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2941394133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85389465,0.0013130612,0.00095700845,0.023727901,0.00010598367,0.00006815174,0.00019273665,0.000033447985,0.11970713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99394184,0.00057122245,0.00016992576,0.0009188386,0.000014229486,0.000013014261,0.000044376255,0.000012729953,0.0043137176],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961957,0.0005262486,0.000047140846,0.0003205379,0.0011058372,0.0018045972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976326,0.0004119893,0.00029168036,0.00010100479,0.00060094544,0.0009616594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019482761,0.00041231397,0.00038254546,0.0029659336,0.037703414,0.008474246,0.0026172579,0.0025638272,0.006772811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004234373,0.00036681327,0.0004420284,0.0035350164,0.028979912,0.0026199603,0.0062475353,0.0044647353,0.00023891524],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007215733,0.00017143357,0.04913363,0.00010228579,0.000026680193,0.0010445977,0.74567455,0.0004405174,0.0010434334,0.16715223,0.01268236,0.022456182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017367665,0.00003218425,0.11143765,0.00021529269,0.00003252849,0.00024663334,0.77129996,0.0008602555,0.00023985063,0.008512052,0.10696417,0.00014210206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.991748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9962847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10768879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10768879,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06883434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78134054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942032744","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1324","title":"Online Gambling, Regulation, and Risks: A Comparison of Gambling Policies in Finland and the Netherlands","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos","keywords":"Legislature; Monopoly; Business; European union; Public economics; Politics; Alibi; Political science; Economics; Law; Microeconomics; International trade","score_opus":0.21232727128167866,"score_gpt":0.4986037706741894,"score_spread":0.2862764993925107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942032744","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845957,0.0015877341,0.000161448,0.00090581446,0.000030120473,0.000021300153,0.00017321305,0.0000015918057,0.012523048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974784,0.00097832,0.00010019631,0.0001509489,0.000012911324,0.000024207973,0.00020744988,0.0000043655355,0.0010431365],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975921,0.0006152263,0.0002567481,0.00021511049,0.0006696816,0.0006511534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99665546,0.0014217331,0.0010646426,0.000079536636,0.0003097786,0.0004689022],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023008883,0.00013719506,0.00040045433,0.0018059141,0.0011000957,0.003812,0.00061054167,0.0010796665,0.0019740316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008680872,0.00021915496,0.0005676608,0.002910459,0.0014539182,0.0024249016,0.0022065635,0.0006324542,0.000094714625],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012333271,0.0006852709,0.7510008,0.00068606966,0.00044384468,0.005832454,0.07113645,0.0043368116,0.0011453999,0.07009242,0.0039189914,0.08948816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000099033474,0.00018711774,0.86914176,0.0006130958,0.00021376833,0.001441684,0.094054654,0.0020704856,0.00044734668,0.004702339,0.02691275,0.00011586073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12577397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17198066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12577397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005631304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056827995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25008374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2942856087","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1346","title":"Issue 2: How We Can “Bell the Cat”: African Canadian Perspectives of the Canadian Child Welfare System","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Child Welfare and Adoption","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generosity; Refugee; Obligation; Welfare; Immigration; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Art","score_opus":0.008860416205719535,"score_gpt":0.24728859840425696,"score_spread":0.23842818219853743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942856087","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025104936,0.012743832,0.00038835645,0.85113865,0.003257378,0.000068188485,0.00018464099,0.000029925648,0.10708409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5286065,0.018258316,0.0015428928,0.35155904,0.0010158912,0.00013431648,0.00012922857,0.00020647969,0.0985474],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885492,0.0022187133,0.00018921935,0.00058497273,0.0025772918,0.005880634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9898902,0.0017737802,0.00034039142,0.00016863037,0.002962019,0.004864869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074328007,0.0007140253,0.00070842274,0.0023078707,0.08492131,0.020556768,0.0049995845,0.0130998995,0.012793687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01092834,0.0005601846,0.00092564145,0.003537676,0.030384898,0.006519308,0.007951275,0.019623026,0.0007274318],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003190419,0.00006166526,0.0055451123,0.0002695855,0.000027633354,0.0018344676,0.29624596,0.00025920878,0.00052301947,0.25861385,0.4125538,0.024033824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008910545,0.000009660754,0.003869928,0.00060197286,0.000020208901,0.00025465796,0.27098083,0.000102838145,0.00011649288,0.0050901854,0.71884006,0.00010431068],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16911724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16911724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2930363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96370625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951686383","doi":"","title":"Reimagining Child Welfare Systems in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Research in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare system; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.036909920160385384,"score_gpt":0.38089399749435043,"score_spread":0.3439840773339651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951686383","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6051938,0.008955714,0.0034560133,0.25811964,0.0017669188,0.0010559417,0.002264033,0.00040769446,0.118780226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93461573,0.0022147894,0.003408692,0.015812995,0.00019397918,0.00018677172,0.00048997777,0.00009250961,0.0429846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97977245,0.002472855,0.00050481845,0.00079270673,0.003939555,0.012517593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9565688,0.0046962984,0.001442134,0.0013063225,0.016154809,0.019831622],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011404858,0.00046951257,0.00074585766,0.003710662,0.022168115,0.014559045,0.006611621,0.0054483367,0.012608358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033462834,0.00082009775,0.0010432478,0.0054428284,0.00726254,0.0034211786,0.0083513195,0.0061076996,0.00049709924],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006308037,0.0006519719,0.12029827,0.00086876866,0.00029901788,0.0025498846,0.0522306,0.01825827,0.0025928952,0.4303643,0.1622612,0.20899399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035293936,0.00047672453,0.24604432,0.0011935334,0.00032996133,0.00031253166,0.0692702,0.0088275885,0.001436104,0.022216752,0.6491621,0.000377261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99661463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.626243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.373757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.63458514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7263531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2952186493","doi":"","title":"Reimagining Child Welfare Systems in Canada – Part II","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Research in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare system; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.040200266660255,"score_gpt":0.37364735461715887,"score_spread":0.33344708795690386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952186493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67024,0.015861206,0.0024689431,0.17203155,0.001346232,0.0012442302,0.0030655456,0.00026377468,0.1334785],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92483974,0.0040494925,0.0035050316,0.014642839,0.00020305462,0.00022882684,0.0008040335,0.00007926242,0.05164775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98111236,0.0019721787,0.0004267107,0.00074773125,0.00441835,0.0113227805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97702456,0.00229184,0.0011508764,0.0007870128,0.010129648,0.008616033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008258051,0.0005821882,0.0007252068,0.0036503128,0.01881309,0.013818407,0.0060408385,0.004738923,0.010847327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023600386,0.0006817283,0.0010348891,0.00627759,0.006609611,0.0037153207,0.0065468247,0.004933147,0.00045367348],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005951758,0.0006841572,0.13523333,0.0013122226,0.00035184645,0.0024820736,0.05837182,0.015217622,0.004025366,0.4058896,0.14517091,0.2306659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002282702,0.00038357583,0.3256885,0.0012023227,0.00028128302,0.00033218472,0.06542584,0.0045811753,0.0018539521,0.012325115,0.5874254,0.000272383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9969597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99855655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6424086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.35759136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5915017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.745103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973293400","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1364","title":"State Redress as Public Policy: A Two-Sided Coin","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; State (computer science); Political science; Social policy; Law and economics; Public relations; Public administration; Law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03722263031627999,"score_gpt":0.39771024542437644,"score_spread":0.36048761510809646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973293400","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006272424,0.016952414,0.023043567,0.72704524,0.0049045254,0.000073155614,0.000045986857,0.00007324937,0.22158948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69021255,0.023128644,0.01312641,0.22072104,0.016261328,0.0006970573,0.000039130482,0.00019811527,0.035615794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9710971,0.017590282,0.0007571123,0.0019455447,0.005961707,0.0026482367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9683354,0.024789758,0.0016615059,0.0018344877,0.0021352433,0.001243746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025032163,0.0010272401,0.0015177007,0.0045490474,0.010276761,0.035616722,0.002785597,0.042518314,0.00683523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031226393,0.00090204686,0.001137849,0.00540648,0.08888893,0.031991668,0.012519593,0.023226365,0.0009108815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035468217,0.000005643728,0.00003947775,0.000013412068,0.0000025043269,0.000009832188,0.00031027678,0.00009807871,0.0000066421912,0.9963437,0.0018426204,0.0013242561],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020852653,0.00001548801,0.00017982599,0.00033494364,0.000013006899,0.000026885462,0.001321304,0.00078379695,0.000063806,0.9522531,0.044958398,0.000028523731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055296635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005525933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042518314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013803971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014559744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1323843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2974507081","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1368","title":"Becoming and Building Community in Toronto: 1980 to Present","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Caribbean history, culture, and politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Sociology; Gender studies; Political science; Media studies; History; Law","score_opus":0.03681716124125988,"score_gpt":0.37119948693682736,"score_spread":0.3343823256955675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2974507081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20467323,0.020750746,0.00049320934,0.11624107,0.002696914,0.00014788337,0.0013289839,0.00014792032,0.65352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7103661,0.0076260436,0.0003514999,0.0049135042,0.0001906759,0.000085740925,0.00039570694,0.000090161484,0.2759805],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983713,0.00028813435,0.000038844126,0.00013724738,0.00035279704,0.00081177446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971552,0.00014225293,0.000120861216,0.00008502351,0.00044608355,0.0020505094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000898404,0.00039192088,0.00027414947,0.0009021294,0.039466467,0.0067136753,0.0012576915,0.0022124578,0.02473891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020580147,0.00046565005,0.00021085491,0.002291762,0.010182861,0.0027094574,0.0067919134,0.0051150154,0.0016095418],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071547096,0.00007664325,0.0067958687,0.00026721903,0.000012963866,0.002610115,0.5491816,0.00014557142,0.0005730756,0.121201344,0.27944252,0.039621565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005192311,0.000020078647,0.015449326,0.0001864386,0.000006917191,0.00015571587,0.21340524,0.000037348258,0.0001758904,0.000982009,0.7695554,0.000020405403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1551802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1551802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.103434734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9798712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977458346","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1342","title":"Issue 2: Reimagining Child Welfare Systems in Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Research in Social Sciences","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Welfare; Welfare system; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.022483457909451054,"score_gpt":0.3580449994807145,"score_spread":0.33556154157126344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977458346","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06824451,0.019580266,0.0011698944,0.78651613,0.011573821,0.00050733,0.0009758933,0.00026436787,0.11116779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6195523,0.022721173,0.0073133945,0.19158937,0.0023994246,0.00033777597,0.0012531499,0.00038432458,0.15444905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819369,0.0012871341,0.00035948766,0.0007291273,0.0067647,0.008922756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764954,0.0019419555,0.00056121225,0.00056262856,0.009143824,0.011294998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008799789,0.00059441844,0.00063877547,0.002092896,0.04803643,0.018443473,0.0075575234,0.009519298,0.011859853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015092291,0.00072724844,0.00094594347,0.0036923143,0.01352027,0.003929809,0.009833161,0.009985936,0.0005345846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006594751,0.00014215079,0.013872562,0.000571509,0.0000660173,0.0013429802,0.053811178,0.0011218912,0.0010906608,0.11066198,0.7340642,0.083188854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022601742,0.000026881706,0.01715155,0.0003468849,0.000021621658,0.00011566073,0.03662616,0.0002773292,0.00028389506,0.0027102376,0.9423261,0.00009104047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68485034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31514964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6424344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79432935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979960706","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1363","title":"Racism and Relief Distribution in the Aftermath of the Halifax Explosion","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Nova scotia; Commission; Compensation (psychology); Racism; Nova (rocket); Skepticism; Distribution (mathematics); Poor relief; Political science; Criminology; History; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology; Ethnology; Aeronautics","score_opus":0.011496378614846717,"score_gpt":0.26534788394445,"score_spread":0.2538515053296033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979960706","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7897412,0.0023632974,0.00036560325,0.046700526,0.00038910023,0.00002745172,0.0000878228,0.000014193861,0.16031086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98529947,0.00051458617,0.00007284914,0.0015436268,0.000058125504,0.0000058785804,0.000017105514,0.0000068669256,0.012481432],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833184,0.00026666975,0.000019832762,0.00007912757,0.00023517212,0.0010673084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986418,0.00032896062,0.0001783675,0.00007380134,0.00032395477,0.00045322333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017232528,0.00014567534,0.0001774515,0.0010522712,0.03379483,0.0057413415,0.00084649917,0.0024488568,0.003170922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029532826,0.00014982384,0.00015300306,0.0010784181,0.015376759,0.0013456579,0.0037722134,0.004099493,0.00014261043],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001866741,0.000102483275,0.031325337,0.0000764822,0.000022376413,0.0034191716,0.4741657,0.0006342106,0.0009871582,0.40733066,0.03436959,0.047380134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030490908,0.00006972446,0.1129305,0.00036382803,0.000024044983,0.0006107913,0.40697905,0.000515811,0.00073132967,0.012376291,0.46527687,0.00009127261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92435604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07564396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061771434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037845735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44818527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993690901","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1367","title":"“All Arabs Are Liars”: Arab and Muslim Stereotypes in Canadian Human Rights Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Terrorism; Racialization; Conviction; Tribunal; Political science; Existentialism; Citizenship; Islam; Law; Islamophobia; Sociology; Criminology; Politics; History","score_opus":0.03567727920030854,"score_gpt":0.3483544763090948,"score_spread":0.3126771971087862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993690901","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83579713,0.0024402377,0.00035182794,0.027131809,0.00014573126,0.000054451997,0.00019050999,0.000015022014,0.1338733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945082,0.00069832685,0.00011055543,0.001382084,0.000010399116,0.0000054167876,0.000027906126,0.0000055951664,0.0032514588],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995747,0.0005943827,0.00009579219,0.00027487578,0.0016466122,0.0016413318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99392045,0.0017122567,0.0005242006,0.00023892322,0.0024851407,0.0011190927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046741827,0.000311171,0.0003138979,0.0034688555,0.04011111,0.0073194453,0.0017753046,0.0019540286,0.005042588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010404587,0.0003863922,0.00026151052,0.004178494,0.020111768,0.0025197254,0.0039522992,0.0037279443,0.00020011686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011783414,0.00013811792,0.120710485,0.00018683184,0.000039770108,0.0012793051,0.62025887,0.00031708507,0.0009129755,0.17454474,0.02386787,0.057626177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022361797,0.000032860342,0.149352,0.00048510905,0.000058108617,0.0003326642,0.7566228,0.00065990054,0.00069346663,0.009065827,0.08252363,0.00015122333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99689496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10883916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10883916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114816725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7896871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013037630","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1376","title":"A Snapshot of the Law in the Streets: Reflections of a Former Parkdale Academic Director","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Connaught Fund; University of Toronto","keywords":"Legal education; Sociology; Experiential learning; Law; Reflection (computer programming); Context (archaeology); Snapshot (computer storage); Political science; History","score_opus":0.12523979684065978,"score_gpt":0.4591753507229872,"score_spread":0.33393555388232743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013037630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68095505,0.0039560106,0.003026553,0.21965757,0.0022962918,0.00012936138,0.00014567685,0.00016847592,0.08966512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9385421,0.0023106632,0.001400482,0.023447009,0.00052273035,0.00006908802,0.000046877245,0.00021916398,0.033441935],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98647654,0.0098271575,0.00019235814,0.00068746833,0.0010554983,0.0017608549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912316,0.0040784455,0.00062232174,0.00028211446,0.0008306423,0.0029546951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055786897,0.0006298534,0.00096172537,0.0020098255,0.048372053,0.016101772,0.002873468,0.008162025,0.006525009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0122435065,0.0012525384,0.00051928405,0.0018591478,0.024952125,0.009486407,0.014969125,0.021692865,0.0011597577],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018839008,0.000109328525,0.0009638547,0.000042101932,0.000004648547,0.0033366666,0.96380943,0.000050845443,0.00040767386,0.007830481,0.0194079,0.0040180916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024536382,0.00002733226,0.00037440058,0.00005468822,0.0000024511871,0.00036932947,0.93405634,0.000039901624,0.00015222731,0.0005527614,0.06435729,0.000010769037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01944391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056469515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048372053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008058331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068032485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058467507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013073302","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1382","title":"Reflecting on Clinical Legal Education at the Indigenous Community Legal Clinic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Legal education; Political science; Legal research; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.323329263932597,"score_gpt":0.5754932380771438,"score_spread":0.25216397414454683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013073302","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.425089,0.00081812404,0.0011516633,0.50533724,0.004473008,0.00052272575,0.00006066602,0.000088494184,0.062459175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8620592,0.0011258858,0.0027604809,0.085286,0.0013749559,0.00024389822,0.000041923744,0.00013076985,0.04697684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768099,0.011998809,0.00053969386,0.0008320876,0.0020377196,0.0077817896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94586086,0.009866524,0.0017982924,0.00088955305,0.004783621,0.036801115],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015008169,0.0004758779,0.00040463018,0.0010265949,0.051532328,0.011386921,0.0039429134,0.01045444,0.024876453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0419995,0.0010456947,0.00065679115,0.00095950224,0.013064622,0.005092017,0.018654678,0.030704627,0.0019373934],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016538665,0.0024981967,0.022541888,0.00038414457,0.000049056613,0.022647895,0.7487979,0.0005562234,0.0043997075,0.013892045,0.11139459,0.072673045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041413463,0.0003178709,0.01256898,0.00039614792,0.000017678105,0.0029082643,0.85748214,0.00021923482,0.0008943257,0.003712699,0.12133238,0.000108892375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06132577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24753083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06132577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021141635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07657108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15339398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013151357","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1381","title":"Clinical Legal Education on the Ground: A Conversation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Political science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering; Communication","score_opus":0.13225084064314827,"score_gpt":0.4753807570936605,"score_spread":0.3431299164505123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013151357","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008008875,0.0032462603,0.00075103005,0.97039056,0.0075857854,0.000058501904,0.000019308152,0.00002528958,0.009914396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1634585,0.005911067,0.0015335212,0.8161367,0.0054864925,0.00031720163,0.00003359309,0.0001342293,0.006988673],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9146252,0.06495246,0.0016439834,0.0037490702,0.0052507874,0.009778439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8787629,0.071945205,0.0029931606,0.001365377,0.0065553756,0.038378056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06469168,0.0012346109,0.0018725351,0.003551149,0.072997674,0.03782193,0.00872439,0.054034684,0.011403165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07810017,0.0020789595,0.001874893,0.003979631,0.053054266,0.05461252,0.037428796,0.11744762,0.0014550762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000092082555,0.00048645772,0.0016845785,0.0004473476,0.00002907887,0.005399573,0.62876,0.00017417216,0.00038127467,0.10264344,0.2365432,0.023358868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057328354,0.00009166813,0.00057979045,0.001272049,0.000009800787,0.0010807611,0.7206034,0.00031131398,0.00007225301,0.014417833,0.26140684,0.00009687275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03187033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05296016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072997674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038621128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048116803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34212637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013193154","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1375","title":"Just Clinics: A Humble Manifesto","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainstream; Economic Justice; Work (physics); Legal service; Accountability; Legal profession; Manifesto; Inequality; Sociology; Intersection (aeronautics); Public relations; Construct (python library); Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.15698979658348106,"score_gpt":0.4787690945841877,"score_spread":0.32177929800070665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013193154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04089562,0.010637499,0.0083461655,0.5874222,0.0065252846,0.000084708496,0.00041903066,0.0004180324,0.34525144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6482635,0.0062901606,0.0027765983,0.16919568,0.004042561,0.00021940048,0.00024881138,0.0004557057,0.16850758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888271,0.0059719915,0.00031454116,0.0010710869,0.0024365168,0.0013787328],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814543,0.012031722,0.0008171351,0.0010417965,0.0015901036,0.0030649127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010097634,0.0003197674,0.00030701834,0.000966182,0.009781963,0.014884653,0.001293594,0.009132085,0.015261536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019185157,0.00044436345,0.00029347886,0.0014542795,0.020668563,0.010325974,0.007939252,0.009673207,0.0018475315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001965402,0.000030916784,0.000690856,0.000085347216,0.0000037607067,0.00009914566,0.011364798,0.0000775644,0.00031279717,0.87716657,0.09363083,0.01651773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018295372,0.000053520504,0.0008808427,0.0002192964,0.0000056572844,0.00013516594,0.0061761728,0.00015241514,0.0002637823,0.039407946,0.9526507,0.000036160676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008876975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020991143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015261536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005953321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144235855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053402066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013296520","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1378","title":"Confronting Accessibility in Clinical Legal Education: Human Rights Law and the Accommodation of Law Students with Disabilities in External Placements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Reasonable accommodation; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Duty; Human rights; Psychology","score_opus":0.09602452262224599,"score_gpt":0.49957155230346584,"score_spread":0.40354702968121986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013296520","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3895827,0.0022571518,0.0053684376,0.33476007,0.0006626897,0.00022033147,0.00004988053,0.00004218274,0.26705655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885111,0.00049873086,0.00060584536,0.006709721,0.000097708384,0.00003722021,0.0000060773295,0.0000088050665,0.0035248105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96243674,0.012706828,0.0009505632,0.0012435657,0.006602185,0.016060174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95083576,0.01990694,0.0057339417,0.0010057561,0.0058962484,0.016621271],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019829337,0.0003615144,0.0005485177,0.0023580515,0.034329195,0.019265983,0.004235668,0.009894222,0.00920709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07329964,0.00047650747,0.0005524597,0.0024335925,0.04477976,0.007893508,0.019401606,0.011970218,0.00036825385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007394992,0.00056736264,0.03339929,0.00022961659,0.000023208033,0.0033587408,0.22985823,0.00079493574,0.00064600585,0.6482045,0.015417546,0.06742661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006136704,0.0001774502,0.05792413,0.0024120458,0.000042343927,0.0017236595,0.722707,0.0013335256,0.0006198969,0.13870879,0.074065074,0.00022468998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59916806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7840996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59916806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04306676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18294606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80638504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013577763","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1377","title":"Home, Precarious Home: A Year of Housing Law Advocacy at a Saskatoon Legal Clinic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Law; Legal service; Representation (politics); Political science; Common law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05871959572544358,"score_gpt":0.39984632916115737,"score_spread":0.34112673343571376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013577763","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9778888,0.00038540232,0.00034174725,0.012508138,0.0005622739,0.00019004889,0.00021204399,0.000044945973,0.007866666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665297,0.0008780404,0.00095307385,0.00889269,0.00022612265,0.00016387152,0.0003443841,0.000054710203,0.021957371],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966732,0.0007671736,0.000062492676,0.00019183948,0.00054228626,0.0017630248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913373,0.00040466478,0.00033683045,0.00015866922,0.00064041285,0.0071221273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029012233,0.00044623495,0.00083340623,0.0012255359,0.021847533,0.0056580114,0.0026028783,0.0023777424,0.0073291208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042868075,0.0008804728,0.0005156487,0.0011186332,0.00492213,0.0023337721,0.009277892,0.008263118,0.0011787658],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024615848,0.007690259,0.21315978,0.00030175113,0.00008782497,0.024375087,0.55916125,0.0004005901,0.002696049,0.0044186045,0.080122806,0.107339814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029366367,0.0007982816,0.13144925,0.0002826925,0.00001851084,0.00213541,0.7925292,0.00025132226,0.00047158301,0.0009517516,0.07099036,0.00009226734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12499057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5891738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8750094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013957575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03480611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2485261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013616847","doi":"","title":"ACCLE and Bill C-75: Implications for Student Legal Clinics & Communities in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.13615245027830042,"score_gpt":0.4707371071459603,"score_spread":0.33458465686765987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013616847","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04665198,0.0010811059,0.00041151795,0.9013364,0.0013408402,0.00018396588,0.00043666796,0.00007204049,0.04848556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43762147,0.0013884925,0.0016939911,0.48736522,0.0010134378,0.00027721006,0.00022654739,0.00010826422,0.07030548],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9596864,0.0047813123,0.0010273597,0.0021140801,0.007653877,0.024737025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82738286,0.03436761,0.0042547486,0.0015149312,0.02963719,0.10284265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017312454,0.00062830624,0.00125102,0.0027976632,0.05578108,0.021228585,0.00997331,0.044449188,0.03569999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07947904,0.0013538433,0.0021149898,0.0038570727,0.013996057,0.005700572,0.009527483,0.02761984,0.0016998928],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026144276,0.0008482083,0.06550943,0.0003415827,0.000109800174,0.0022102697,0.022133516,0.0023221623,0.0004270399,0.21978799,0.6412681,0.044780456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089482125,0.00055032835,0.2293022,0.0038671265,0.0004918816,0.0011095003,0.2439226,0.006796338,0.0007849084,0.068264045,0.44312903,0.00088712206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99136704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8152348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18476523,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6141316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94555676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3024097784","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1365","title":"Measuring Correctional Admissions of Aboriginal Offenders in Canada: A Relative Inter-jurisdictional Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Criminology; Sanctions; Criminal justice; Population; Political science; Prison; Crime statistics; Representation (politics); Psychology; Law; Sociology; Demography","score_opus":0.02914283313885587,"score_gpt":0.32655246513061015,"score_spread":0.2974096319917543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3024097784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9921097,0.0004101194,0.00079166424,0.0002710269,0.000015036018,0.000119758355,0.003079484,0.000026701246,0.003176487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99563146,0.00037072605,0.0011354293,0.000060594957,0.000008690457,0.000060911305,0.0015887119,0.000011877304,0.0011316496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962812,0.00046802664,0.0003061302,0.00047016327,0.0017999718,0.0006744464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99117637,0.0007476302,0.0016583792,0.00029720075,0.0053574834,0.0007629668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025795074,0.0004291782,0.00046844798,0.005808835,0.004368181,0.0019422107,0.0020550427,0.0003837437,0.0014218945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009665458,0.00024203474,0.00062419445,0.011081212,0.0013437464,0.00073956343,0.0025258353,0.0008240317,0.00020196567],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006582744,0.000032053355,0.97783285,0.00009909351,0.00012224598,0.00008142966,0.0072437404,0.00038231653,0.0003211784,0.00051186903,0.00084003253,0.01246742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012154975,0.000026572072,0.9904316,0.00003120697,0.000037179634,0.000044470147,0.007360156,0.0004885188,0.000104905725,0.000048264155,0.0014111225,0.000014678816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98425066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99094045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02768793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02768793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030354256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20089096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3089536886","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1395","title":"Thinking Broadly: This Volume as a Guide for Abolitionists","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Race, History, and American Society","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Political science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.025441830442847424,"score_gpt":0.3447058058358958,"score_spread":0.31926397539304835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3089536886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008442986,0.06259673,0.012024346,0.49954277,0.07841019,0.00046332978,0.00050829124,0.0011475651,0.34446242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0062430473,0.040601626,0.01066283,0.25183573,0.03548807,0.0013539,0.0006259749,0.0012847515,0.65190405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972844,0.0011854472,0.00014644275,0.00021266691,0.0008530802,0.0003178246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965065,0.002088046,0.00015044199,0.00016395583,0.0005783196,0.0005127406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004123649,0.0021097802,0.001414273,0.0027060735,0.008197872,0.01241724,0.0031953964,0.012720839,0.041770637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008532124,0.0011521961,0.0007731535,0.0033336545,0.007993203,0.014044335,0.0047424035,0.01642442,0.037252575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031814614,0.000039000402,0.00005937071,0.000039210594,0.0000017212167,0.000015829419,0.0011562261,0.00003240455,0.000054642616,0.02522599,0.9569917,0.016380776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036851397,0.000008389063,0.00007844417,0.00014669409,0.0000012038726,0.000025668254,0.0018293787,0.000035318026,0.00002247909,0.017907126,0.9799326,0.000009035927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009407336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031461522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041770637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030466835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067997053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13973671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090007280","doi":"","title":"The Jail Accountability & Information Line: Early Reflections on Praxis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Accountability; Line (geometry); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05839991195907557,"score_gpt":0.3994869199266573,"score_spread":0.34108700796758173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090007280","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00937402,0.00808607,0.008328242,0.87414443,0.003965976,0.00007188766,0.000051429277,0.00005916482,0.09591875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7209237,0.0052753985,0.008461161,0.1969046,0.0047982736,0.00047614184,0.000040766106,0.00036399465,0.06275598],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96929425,0.020254398,0.0012697686,0.0021191023,0.003710721,0.0033517303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87423635,0.10537566,0.003022484,0.0032339925,0.010374819,0.0037566598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054145604,0.00064758526,0.0007034785,0.0027423175,0.022587154,0.03554291,0.0036047434,0.02441691,0.008599308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086142115,0.0009984534,0.0006466379,0.0027311784,0.09663817,0.038135312,0.010114678,0.050842956,0.0009572852],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017925027,0.000029738647,0.0002425977,0.000078539495,0.0000039710603,0.00008319993,0.049393386,0.00007937675,0.000046162535,0.91283196,0.029824879,0.007368277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029848092,0.000048923397,0.001195174,0.0019323534,0.000012173446,0.00015085889,0.07232741,0.0004142853,0.00057055196,0.41529292,0.5079173,0.000108279426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038953964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047386218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054145604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025533382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036254812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28635275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090131877","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1399","title":"Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Bill C-83, Solitary Confinement, and Mental Health","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Legislature; Prison; Mental health; Public administration; Order (exchange); Corporate governance; Political science; Sight; Law; Psychology; Psychiatry; Business","score_opus":0.08871129233230568,"score_gpt":0.4334946295415878,"score_spread":0.3447833372092821,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090131877","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36847502,0.009765351,0.0025410517,0.39406276,0.00082151766,0.00006149178,0.00011693454,0.000030113668,0.22412574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611532,0.0018708726,0.00036194228,0.024988528,0.00013942373,0.00002455878,0.00001808316,0.000010878869,0.011432359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958341,0.0012544628,0.00014164051,0.0002448384,0.0010896217,0.0014352486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714214,0.0010870663,0.0005417436,0.00014650538,0.00048453384,0.0005981089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033720694,0.00013919949,0.00020308277,0.0005262127,0.016924607,0.0055120178,0.0012287585,0.006042142,0.002214348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009067017,0.000298565,0.00028636085,0.0010312123,0.03557202,0.002914472,0.004762456,0.004991289,0.00017464705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052491407,0.000049239734,0.022640754,0.000113598784,0.00001380609,0.0018346595,0.119646706,0.0003286071,0.0003854787,0.78364223,0.041428324,0.029864186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059688773,0.00011054013,0.1322983,0.0019308046,0.00007942592,0.0019823832,0.2923368,0.00074740866,0.00091753236,0.10567982,0.46359187,0.0002654797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8255994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91879404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17440063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04026799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058139127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35085535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090789814","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1397","title":"Detaining the Uncooperative Migrant","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Refugees, and Integration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Okanagan University College; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration detention; Political science; Immigration law; Deportation; Law; Statutory law; Agency (philosophy); Politics; Prison; Naturalisation; Refugee; Criminology; Sociology; Citizenship","score_opus":0.041794123264383254,"score_gpt":0.3429789858022383,"score_spread":0.30118486253785504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090789814","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46140313,0.005190933,0.0050669583,0.16250184,0.0041663763,0.0004158828,0.0001590816,0.00019729823,0.36089844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71051806,0.0023355035,0.0026762728,0.045991436,0.00021108382,0.00006674736,0.0000966484,0.00004016429,0.23806408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986563,0.00021149112,0.00004388142,0.00017636248,0.00023384539,0.00067817094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921715,0.00008289679,0.00006074653,0.000056398178,0.00020490774,0.00037791382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010979186,0.00031913148,0.00020349468,0.0004011937,0.01999612,0.0016749932,0.0013573735,0.003167817,0.004320846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002685319,0.00020719388,0.00028450004,0.00026498133,0.005469775,0.000659023,0.0031846506,0.0043584136,0.0010929169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009212427,0.00026217685,0.044568017,0.00022624961,0.0000337352,0.03410789,0.27878815,0.00048761934,0.0065097776,0.14055437,0.31401816,0.1803518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016645658,0.0001884432,0.033796545,0.00057348766,0.000035846537,0.01441627,0.17495188,0.00046992433,0.001798063,0.0055994196,0.7680686,0.000084951294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61382943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85013485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61382943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061204717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030312436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77688956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090940754","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1398","title":"No One Is Disposable: Towards Feminist Models of Transformative Justice","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Transformative learning; Grassroots; Accountability; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Economic Justice; Harm; Prison; Criminology; Friendship; Feminism; Political science; Public relations; Gender studies; Law; Social science; Politics; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.13235689146542756,"score_gpt":0.3843415584535591,"score_spread":0.25198466698813154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090940754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075151406,0.008219569,0.08798335,0.3647499,0.00139963,0.00016471725,0.00006502961,0.00013616662,0.46213022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.969427,0.0020302683,0.008820281,0.007384991,0.00033457554,0.00020544854,0.000018806104,0.00006773113,0.011710886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98868716,0.008993594,0.00010979068,0.00057291664,0.00076214713,0.00087430776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98901457,0.008444303,0.0007677034,0.00051416096,0.00052129576,0.0007379422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016271759,0.0007790597,0.0005373081,0.0023680811,0.011265925,0.014798438,0.002963956,0.0048872116,0.0034655407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0082141785,0.0003434401,0.00054870435,0.0013105458,0.1151115,0.017751683,0.009134925,0.009265439,0.00041074108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003901394,0.00001092738,0.00008333787,0.000016476313,9.513771e-7,0.000044969882,0.043499712,0.00011265478,0.000027119186,0.9541678,0.0005402444,0.0014920199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008263957,0.00001906915,0.00013505873,0.00015433077,0.0000027517576,0.00008193936,0.065018795,0.0005859392,0.00014541819,0.86487234,0.06896492,0.000011173245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055682217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056377635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016271759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010612363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008056494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086054265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121406069","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1401","title":"Litigation is “Just One Tool”: An Annotated Interview with Karin Baqi, Counsel for the End Immigration Detention Network in Brown v Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College","funders":"Beijing Academy of Quantum Information Sciences","keywords":"Immigration detention; Immigration; Victory; Political science; Law; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Criminology; Politics; Human rights; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.05775602021028973,"score_gpt":0.33315976926014346,"score_spread":0.2754037490498537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121406069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22859424,0.006447935,0.0019117092,0.6430704,0.0021368659,0.00027880643,0.00016364234,0.00008895087,0.117307514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8195429,0.004220739,0.0008857935,0.13504565,0.0003732274,0.0001731504,0.000074327094,0.00015350783,0.039530728],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720857,0.0132414475,0.0007041771,0.0015254167,0.005426138,0.0070170444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755897,0.014246081,0.0013317444,0.0003232137,0.0035416032,0.004967676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012542399,0.00063144474,0.00088437164,0.0015504609,0.09454501,0.01840102,0.0046357894,0.017356915,0.004663394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02912407,0.0011285061,0.00054032,0.0030677726,0.032216825,0.008935927,0.00834359,0.029130898,0.0005063243],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013408367,0.000047607882,0.0012178427,0.00005393785,0.000004704998,0.0025781954,0.92098725,0.000081076396,0.0003186711,0.022948582,0.046784297,0.0049643577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042600195,0.000012305938,0.00097362744,0.00016169812,0.000004307835,0.00028577432,0.85313016,0.00010920839,0.00012847024,0.0012938409,0.14385138,0.000044995395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84583974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92376006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15416026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10860895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11876899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7880168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122538769","doi":"","title":"Don't Get Enough Credit: The Need for an Impartial Consumer Credit Report Appeal Tribunal in Ontario","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Appeal; Creditor; Business; Credit history; Debt; Tribunal; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.05373279725040031,"score_gpt":0.3740905111768526,"score_spread":0.3203577139264523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122538769","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09983293,0.0038901104,0.0031686695,0.6226805,0.004285358,0.0007311347,0.00047188188,0.00031103464,0.2646285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45158097,0.004004702,0.0055896034,0.16935953,0.0012059993,0.0004275272,0.00042000282,0.00041752038,0.3669942],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745559,0.0019422661,0.0010785245,0.0022302389,0.012061492,0.008131512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93086624,0.013883991,0.0027311735,0.0022388475,0.027591044,0.022688696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015313924,0.00038859682,0.0007840717,0.0014543309,0.05609865,0.017678564,0.0060313744,0.014775222,0.02309458],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04493066,0.0016615828,0.0010038194,0.0026278407,0.012436142,0.0057366616,0.007977652,0.013966049,0.0016642333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021831268,0.0002350151,0.03341084,0.00044145354,0.00008794029,0.010461684,0.05448168,0.0005778309,0.0023667815,0.15145063,0.6772042,0.06906373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007629837,0.000057451332,0.025064025,0.00038930244,0.0000722251,0.0007522204,0.037611127,0.0010503003,0.0004668866,0.009653641,0.9246009,0.00020565344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98402196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16452639,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16452639,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3799582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.969031},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124602407","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1258","title":"Troubling Trends in Canada’s Immigration System Via the Excluded Family Member Regulation: A Survey of Jurisprudence and Lawyers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family reunification; Harm; Misrepresentation; Immigration; Refugee; Law; Family member; Political science; Immigration detention; Immigration law; Family law; Jurisprudence; Criminology; Sociology; History; Genealogy","score_opus":0.06424663170657442,"score_gpt":0.37373036712955027,"score_spread":0.30948373542297586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124602407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9019003,0.0067059137,0.0003954092,0.07126403,0.00010803579,0.00009720176,0.00015817974,0.000036394842,0.019334529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776624,0.0044148713,0.0003710382,0.013493933,0.000056990863,0.0000216566,0.00008516935,0.000018904502,0.003875146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811613,0.0019077165,0.0007977388,0.001455784,0.009699735,0.004977729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9452708,0.017984541,0.009816434,0.0010095785,0.015182621,0.010735997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009725724,0.00020280607,0.00038199683,0.0048946687,0.023680748,0.009851028,0.0030080273,0.0050057936,0.002507997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034214005,0.00078158645,0.00034278346,0.006635393,0.011976802,0.0021338856,0.0040486753,0.005863217,0.00019811279],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010264707,0.00045158336,0.4619498,0.00042630752,0.000056775985,0.0049029435,0.34311828,0.0002951524,0.0033506206,0.032478653,0.034865424,0.11800187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023151986,0.00014360399,0.45332986,0.00072667986,0.000036536774,0.0018960247,0.36001876,0.0008172915,0.0009418013,0.0018359137,0.180055,0.00017535579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9485925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96928465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08032944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08032944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14187415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58283365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125041644","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1269","title":"Making a Music City: The Commodification of Culture in Toronto’s Urban Redevelopment, Tensions between Use-Value and Exchange-Value, and the Counterproductive Treatment of Alternative Cultures within Municipal Legal Frameworks","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Cultural Industries and Urban Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Commodification; Redevelopment; Value (mathematics); Urban regeneration; Sociology; Diversity (politics); Inclusion (mineral); Political science; Public administration; Environmental ethics; Social science; Environmental planning; Economy; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.0961673441073551,"score_gpt":0.38595875962873366,"score_spread":0.28979141552137855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125041644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5666269,0.0037959514,0.006885445,0.040259738,0.0001716139,0.000051777533,0.00008412856,0.000074309064,0.38204998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851385,0.0005118998,0.0007277291,0.00036485176,0.000011027318,0.000011871996,0.000008944257,0.0000134983575,0.0132116545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876827,0.00051719707,0.00002500268,0.0000756082,0.00025675018,0.0003572032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999119,0.00027807374,0.00009571428,0.00010345214,0.00010100529,0.00030271156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011266952,0.00019973065,0.00012768769,0.00060368836,0.018572837,0.007949929,0.00075619784,0.001086808,0.0037884905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012775151,0.00023310116,0.00017385237,0.0011579621,0.029238317,0.0026353763,0.0050446577,0.001278232,0.000132763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030435524,0.0000150416945,0.004367151,0.000086504515,0.000009609349,0.001007889,0.22312252,0.0010391724,0.00085108384,0.7310217,0.00997234,0.028476425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021877466,0.000045565692,0.02133792,0.00022568929,0.00003566468,0.0004087943,0.39149016,0.0018264,0.0019357664,0.07884602,0.5037443,0.00008186196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71057904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9078144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28942096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.046582554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022907455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58225083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125733836","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1300","title":"Issue 1: Federal Legislation on Indigenous Child Welfare in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Parliament; Welfare; Political science; Public administration; Tribunal; Law; Commission; Exclusive jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.01256653014907309,"score_gpt":0.30808344947787347,"score_spread":0.29551691932880036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125733836","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06842229,0.012738755,0.002918433,0.4667639,0.009909145,0.0007386411,0.0040511745,0.00051751034,0.43394008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38646325,0.011408254,0.006490484,0.29239798,0.0017844221,0.0004845906,0.0018156315,0.00021901679,0.29893637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98205537,0.0011361822,0.0005925398,0.0010088077,0.00936796,0.005839158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9836565,0.0046389145,0.00067611545,0.00057774025,0.008081196,0.0023695338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008057345,0.0004531004,0.00063612725,0.002217686,0.024287641,0.008726675,0.0044731507,0.011757708,0.010190059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022927795,0.00072536716,0.0010301052,0.002691306,0.006332926,0.0021101455,0.004294422,0.010017628,0.00071612425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005420512,0.00015764085,0.011061301,0.00046626132,0.00006066432,0.001040914,0.016802775,0.0007577488,0.0010942362,0.4248349,0.499941,0.04372837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026817552,0.000019261011,0.017224157,0.0006047505,0.000053609714,0.000112461326,0.0043258867,0.00039485263,0.00065039564,0.0037737335,0.9727188,0.0000952481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9902851,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.119363755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.119363755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.407889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8660487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125927919","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1319","title":"Keeping Chance in Its Place: The Socio-Legal Regulation of Gambling","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Renting; Payment; Sociology; Sitting; Law; Media studies; Political science; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.11707365193522641,"score_gpt":0.437954903840111,"score_spread":0.3208812519048846,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125927919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46519983,0.01233877,0.0045017214,0.28872937,0.0017539561,0.000050994837,0.00011369337,0.00007303907,0.22723868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98361236,0.0015276397,0.00022764978,0.0081212185,0.00020652216,0.000021121565,0.000023056235,0.000033401502,0.006227114],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98812664,0.007013418,0.0002716683,0.0011293747,0.0013027849,0.002156157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98265576,0.011341788,0.0016682752,0.0008976753,0.0010180102,0.0024184373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009739819,0.00020205833,0.0004380059,0.0015635563,0.019495675,0.018559562,0.002149342,0.005666358,0.0038121573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015573534,0.0005651766,0.0003545384,0.0019789368,0.07784548,0.009285701,0.008907342,0.0077019418,0.0005093784],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043936703,0.00004722598,0.008799892,0.00009479366,0.000015752663,0.0009736659,0.48558757,0.00015772304,0.00026826755,0.4675572,0.021028625,0.0154252695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027084952,0.000057866204,0.030102998,0.00088191143,0.000028490338,0.00064923597,0.4830857,0.00056856644,0.0003964098,0.09693409,0.38711873,0.00014891554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12844956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18874002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12844956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013110754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01071111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25540382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133168691","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1409","title":"A Pipeline Story: The Evolving Autonomy of Canadian Municipalities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Government of Canada","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Legislature; Statutory law; Legislation; Context (archaeology); Political science; Autonomy; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Law; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.04232552655796398,"score_gpt":0.33370421449100807,"score_spread":0.2913786879330441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133168691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41091204,0.00580757,0.0017066468,0.24775362,0.00050018093,0.00009011593,0.00079426303,0.000080470614,0.33235502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95999485,0.0017992822,0.00055532285,0.009554121,0.00004711955,0.000021498594,0.000103062346,0.000028338336,0.027896332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99372333,0.00069139217,0.00009534003,0.00053262216,0.002020888,0.0029362848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99332035,0.0015171752,0.00029682054,0.00019347481,0.0026907865,0.0019813462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003485234,0.00027844214,0.00040496048,0.0022637083,0.058245238,0.012193242,0.0021828036,0.0042581502,0.005825215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010448369,0.00043030106,0.00041630754,0.004651027,0.017052917,0.003682053,0.0050488,0.005768251,0.0002334626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008521231,0.000031985106,0.014137644,0.00010462199,0.000025783907,0.0014161682,0.14303075,0.0007695836,0.000633355,0.7487666,0.06288737,0.028110977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025963662,0.000024194243,0.029013649,0.00028904338,0.000043802007,0.00026283687,0.18036696,0.0009310577,0.00047170097,0.0253406,0.7630215,0.00020875398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99761105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7563052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24369478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26617128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87720686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133595346","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1408","title":"The Missing Constitutionalism of Canada v Vavilov","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Appeal; Citizenship; Political science; Constitution; Administrative law; Law; Legislation; Argument (complex analysis); Constitutional law; Judicial review; Supreme court; Legalism (Western philosophy); Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.028926299598757338,"score_gpt":0.3183451814879905,"score_spread":0.28941888188923315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133595346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.108402744,0.022289876,0.0104515245,0.2029612,0.0014845632,0.0001257756,0.0006457294,0.00024150305,0.653397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346127,0.0036769668,0.0021602563,0.024609828,0.00021002087,0.000044795965,0.000119894976,0.00008416411,0.034481462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891804,0.0014533346,0.0002786363,0.0016725179,0.0038363314,0.0035787898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960109,0.0014578138,0.00020184988,0.0002630232,0.0011532675,0.00091315835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044208476,0.00029466453,0.0005478311,0.0014461956,0.020308128,0.012648651,0.0026835445,0.004912573,0.004186305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009491167,0.00050118193,0.0005817985,0.0020141725,0.021915747,0.0027437834,0.0034294296,0.007213267,0.00030278772],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000763501,0.0000025201375,0.0005610693,0.000024292745,0.0000073810193,0.00013274126,0.0024778259,0.00017096117,0.00010736672,0.9814518,0.011017181,0.0040391707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045656343,0.0000290468,0.007945829,0.0004385478,0.000084758845,0.00031064972,0.011009204,0.001456884,0.0008573184,0.22682631,0.75078017,0.00021566397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99127835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14765982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14765982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16554151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9885938},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142767516","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1407","title":"Deference to Legislatures: The Case of the 2018 Ontario Better Local Government Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Deference; Legislature; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Judicial deference; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02903838877367183,"score_gpt":0.305100085928771,"score_spread":0.2760616971550992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142767516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42269203,0.0039705774,0.003317738,0.18104705,0.0006595489,0.0001836498,0.0002027458,0.000055952634,0.38787076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.955317,0.0007826843,0.00059988117,0.013374975,0.00016411494,0.00007796414,0.000035066,0.000023112847,0.029625202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97647756,0.006383134,0.00059109286,0.0016091692,0.008171657,0.00676741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98153234,0.011156057,0.0012651574,0.00068635395,0.0036884446,0.0016716411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012709723,0.00036371974,0.0006339475,0.0013028242,0.045491,0.009979108,0.0030433899,0.011736993,0.003746942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028730553,0.00072611205,0.0006672051,0.0020706148,0.025651215,0.0043457723,0.005372711,0.012082091,0.00036091608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007903475,0.000056193185,0.0058069527,0.00012158327,0.000020115427,0.0040337313,0.19276045,0.0007490928,0.0006333773,0.76401174,0.023087814,0.008639962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012742417,0.00007947565,0.022646489,0.00058678846,0.00009645238,0.0006737306,0.13727038,0.0021097146,0.0012462663,0.07738249,0.75752,0.00026071141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8897323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9420218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12098141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12098141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07692424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8777857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150226060","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1405","title":"The Better Local Government Act versus Municipal Democracy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Local government; Democracy; Public administration; Political science; Business; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.029564945102533626,"score_gpt":0.35098515828569643,"score_spread":0.32142021318316283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150226060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015930846,0.009458685,0.0018401559,0.17328179,0.0012497472,0.000030958807,0.00029503473,0.000098347205,0.79781455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7384705,0.0038341237,0.0008208365,0.047016766,0.0014355577,0.00010752122,0.00019935885,0.00014082219,0.20797464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157554,0.004152023,0.00031251466,0.00074815424,0.0014061383,0.0018056154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956943,0.0011997914,0.00054570823,0.0008662856,0.00082234043,0.00087157666],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004093089,0.0003397849,0.00048328118,0.0010237064,0.0072523407,0.010922858,0.0010024193,0.00514095,0.018971734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009136423,0.00020503152,0.00033238714,0.0022378955,0.017384728,0.006370126,0.005252803,0.0058529954,0.0030118634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106633215,0.000006550039,0.00044016252,0.000023509845,0.0000022318477,0.00003402488,0.0023025463,0.000069441674,0.000018494104,0.9657229,0.02678237,0.0045870584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026156908,0.000028879205,0.0028589491,0.0002974277,0.000015975083,0.00006495201,0.007218676,0.00020560721,0.000096178956,0.109068125,0.8800933,0.000025857693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20504402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33559015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20504402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018462203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016928175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40770108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151230307","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1410","title":"With Great(er) Power Comes Great(er) Responsibility: Indigenous Rights and Municipal Autonomy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Indigenous rights; Autonomy; Political science; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Democracy; Public administration; Law; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Local government; Empowerment; Sociology; Human rights; Politics","score_opus":0.02316959477108585,"score_gpt":0.3310868733339203,"score_spread":0.30791727856283446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151230307","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21609297,0.0046611694,0.003928077,0.06906833,0.00021169418,0.000030236393,0.000047103687,0.000023892737,0.7059365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839811,0.00062268286,0.00028271042,0.00081039546,0.000033558943,0.0000064282003,0.0000057565,0.000004827773,0.014252578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718297,0.00092399126,0.00005505643,0.00016783361,0.0005748392,0.0010953743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984907,0.0005866974,0.00015905514,0.0001072604,0.00027366923,0.0003826941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019149609,0.00013102955,0.00016635477,0.0005508757,0.009720445,0.005427924,0.0006606467,0.0014846793,0.002719658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032190124,0.00012403632,0.00017500929,0.0006930616,0.036804438,0.0031640832,0.0046840957,0.0016369785,0.00015542205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035074086,0.0000030865283,0.0008981848,0.000014311734,0.000001595412,0.00015965567,0.049068652,0.000106272084,0.00009109972,0.9453461,0.0013947956,0.002912787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015810989,0.00002781974,0.017905619,0.00033875607,0.000025706464,0.0003319791,0.21622215,0.00046513224,0.00068004616,0.32378963,0.440136,0.00006132609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6260802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7942104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6260802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024077043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028893437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75224376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3151993704","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1412","title":"Toward City Charters in Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Political Systems and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.03735381644556585,"score_gpt":0.313402935141677,"score_spread":0.27604911869611115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3151993704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6202734,0.0026377784,0.0018073618,0.1472031,0.0009882891,0.0004231024,0.0010375105,0.0001226147,0.2255068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8751541,0.0012771176,0.0016243868,0.008246186,0.000073361705,0.00006406232,0.00035231726,0.00006274785,0.113145865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951003,0.0007344917,0.00010137053,0.00038133358,0.0012440704,0.0024383815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833151,0.0012977913,0.0005178983,0.00027586138,0.00815852,0.0064348867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005202767,0.0002487933,0.00033375953,0.0021509584,0.029675081,0.01040767,0.002352982,0.0028725693,0.011748962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0116639715,0.0004648562,0.00036076418,0.003672186,0.0045895986,0.0016200283,0.0032024921,0.005045536,0.0005280227],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025310362,0.00031476928,0.12885869,0.00021195675,0.000051673356,0.001407401,0.102677666,0.0028154477,0.0014559441,0.28056496,0.36781597,0.113572426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077732126,0.00008060316,0.13715863,0.0003262486,0.00006048273,0.000113358205,0.17009139,0.0019813178,0.0008628995,0.0059776264,0.6831354,0.00013432777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1393742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1393742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3209372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99820393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152291097","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1411","title":"Bill 5: How the Better Local Government Act Silenced the Voices of Diverse Progressive Women Candidates in Toronto’s 2018 Municipal Election","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Gender Politics and Representation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Local government; Local election; Public administration; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02259878049350867,"score_gpt":0.3315563076463742,"score_spread":0.30895752715286556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152291097","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51136905,0.0009584461,0.00092585257,0.2978349,0.0039566704,0.00014675976,0.0004358196,0.00012340298,0.18424907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8493557,0.00022377494,0.00017331743,0.023832276,0.00037888804,0.00006696029,0.00009044223,0.00013652397,0.12574214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99231863,0.0021086878,0.00012398457,0.0005176857,0.00093299866,0.0039980714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99339736,0.002318301,0.00029933895,0.00021670946,0.0011127495,0.0026555785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00490009,0.0005078938,0.00039630217,0.0007261477,0.04802941,0.011990217,0.001850877,0.0114797875,0.016776301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0117848925,0.0006419748,0.0004922232,0.0008386968,0.01333517,0.0024853284,0.006881131,0.014615202,0.0016949517],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032114278,0.00006893255,0.012841553,0.00011199832,0.000041023053,0.0024952637,0.6173156,0.00038480948,0.0016121599,0.07307406,0.27875832,0.012975101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004924583,0.00008524308,0.020711843,0.00017035476,0.00005077806,0.00014527258,0.47858673,0.00025329224,0.0012322419,0.0027957167,0.49581936,0.00009993746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8432009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9612414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15679908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.068218574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042759772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4949627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152976178","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1253","title":"Beyond Reconciliation: Decolonizing Clinical Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia","keywords":"Decolonization; Colonialism; Legal education; Political science; Indigenous; Law; Sociology; Economic Justice; Hegemony; Politics","score_opus":0.12303640261836599,"score_gpt":0.5184570339269928,"score_spread":0.3954206313086268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152976178","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17151713,0.00755568,0.03476486,0.5443274,0.0013445321,0.00031761473,0.000035693425,0.00026852803,0.2398686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9569968,0.0013650915,0.00690124,0.024313217,0.00018952365,0.00009668269,0.000022403281,0.00008250518,0.010032577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95795435,0.02788825,0.000870867,0.0024079613,0.0037435615,0.0071349684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9616802,0.016908435,0.0039271396,0.0046272967,0.0052704285,0.0075865337],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032210633,0.0005428836,0.0006684701,0.0024035675,0.031091293,0.017955502,0.0034840268,0.0073941927,0.005669026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052785322,0.0004659129,0.0006064398,0.002006709,0.08583076,0.016189598,0.029443372,0.015534049,0.00066031533],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000360803,0.00010713898,0.0040329383,0.00021918156,0.000015778482,0.00044415536,0.28051487,0.0005372684,0.0003158202,0.6396354,0.011549242,0.06259218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000671345,0.00012576678,0.0053670425,0.0014363381,0.000031121745,0.0005720533,0.26326188,0.001425851,0.000818553,0.34578907,0.38097727,0.00012789996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17863402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26222757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17863402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043114096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13689435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3551885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154836732","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1396","title":"Intergenerational Imprisonment: Resistance and Resilience in Indigenous Communities","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Imprisonment; Criminalization; Temporalities; Criminology; Colonialism; Residential school; Resistance (ecology); Sociology; Argument (complex analysis); Economic Justice; Political science; Gender studies; Law; Socioeconomics; Medicine","score_opus":0.02379190157330029,"score_gpt":0.32678869114644193,"score_spread":0.30299678957314163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154836732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96691215,0.0010161074,0.00033426387,0.0069964593,0.000059394086,0.000021797876,0.000011370196,0.000008768386,0.024639638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981906,0.00034460105,0.000056308385,0.000183627,0.000005908583,0.0000059488225,0.0000028834027,0.0000028344039,0.001207332],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960366,0.0016412556,0.00006121578,0.00027043078,0.0003354187,0.0016551001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99739873,0.0006453267,0.000447136,0.0002272424,0.00035598275,0.0009255168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003768427,0.00028886797,0.00043750266,0.0012624123,0.023923978,0.0057436554,0.0018132603,0.0014293425,0.0026145359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056991642,0.00024678023,0.00033050578,0.000941651,0.030071437,0.003335924,0.013227626,0.0024964546,0.00013228168],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012303838,0.00002427565,0.012027243,0.000024891202,0.000010484281,0.0008412183,0.96565163,0.000053302305,0.00012787057,0.013774727,0.0006010895,0.0068509597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014929726,0.000018113522,0.013667267,0.00011109877,0.000006797594,0.0002578349,0.9748697,0.000066180226,0.000048824128,0.002760175,0.00817726,0.000015257977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43682575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5323756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56317425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011781384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016504128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8685663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155053350","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1406","title":"Games of Jurisdiction: How Local Governance Realities Challenge the “Creatures of the Province” Doctrine","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Citizenship; Political science; Local government; Politics; Democracy; Law; Government (linguistics); Argument (complex analysis); Public administration; Corporate governance; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.0191491250447018,"score_gpt":0.30860168624758355,"score_spread":0.28945256120288176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155053350","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29147804,0.0020870147,0.015702872,0.06952799,0.00018118945,0.000077809644,0.00016615957,0.000106090505,0.6206728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931411,0.00014425385,0.00039536963,0.00041743767,0.000011620447,0.000010164768,0.000010829238,0.000016302069,0.005852947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559754,0.0020327547,0.00005525755,0.00039441622,0.00063201116,0.0012879753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968232,0.0011792614,0.00021002717,0.0004180611,0.00063721667,0.00073240226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038259246,0.00023459594,0.00049476686,0.00082523626,0.016773146,0.01394458,0.0021117749,0.002798942,0.0061009554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008319885,0.00032615455,0.00037319478,0.001185548,0.049992915,0.0058645876,0.005905115,0.0027264964,0.0003727418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013961752,0.0000052309306,0.0012935416,0.000016140237,0.000005523389,0.00013034957,0.034506135,0.00062948803,0.00009000516,0.9570144,0.0035860117,0.0027091014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056882098,0.000021889677,0.0056004846,0.00014849959,0.000034255438,0.000100729776,0.096852325,0.0034877907,0.00025505095,0.72567207,0.16771355,0.0000564892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.753831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8444991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.753831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.058458503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028788865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4952374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163384500","doi":"","title":"Beyond Reconciliation: Decolonizing Clinical Legal Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Decolonization; Colonialism; Legal education; Political science; Law; Indigenous; Sociology; Economic Justice; Politics","score_opus":0.12303640261836599,"score_gpt":0.5184570339269928,"score_spread":0.3954206313086268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163384500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18624023,0.0074894824,0.034928847,0.52383345,0.0014261073,0.0003357816,0.000037438036,0.00026705308,0.24544156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9593868,0.001254266,0.006465139,0.02271999,0.00017798741,0.0000946556,0.000020622174,0.00008271487,0.009797762],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9572666,0.028300462,0.0009284859,0.002460474,0.0038386506,0.007205382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600019,0.01762021,0.0042690425,0.00503224,0.005642854,0.007433729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0337306,0.0005515166,0.00068038446,0.0024918683,0.030181525,0.017895056,0.0033755903,0.0070461454,0.005603539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054830056,0.0004770815,0.00062827335,0.0020082558,0.09132526,0.016106872,0.028497169,0.014964219,0.00063483504],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003755153,0.000102433914,0.0041091354,0.0002156402,0.000016184633,0.00043522028,0.27022463,0.0004969639,0.0003092797,0.65736836,0.009920882,0.05676368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073468356,0.00013399037,0.0057140496,0.0015305019,0.00003309496,0.00056664716,0.26675308,0.0014523761,0.0008500064,0.35243794,0.37032026,0.00013460244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17606944,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25413683,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82393056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04349331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13341604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3500892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W316766959","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1214","title":"Scotland: Delivering a Right to Housing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Investment (military); Public housing; Business; Economic growth; Political science; Public administration; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.0921595675828305,"score_gpt":0.45364149231555034,"score_spread":0.36148192473271984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W316766959","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012446766,0.010752088,0.0009899781,0.698694,0.015575204,0.00010362932,0.0003143926,0.00014407565,0.26097983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20213437,0.010121855,0.0016301546,0.4248676,0.008762225,0.00019003027,0.0002899472,0.00011553988,0.3518884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951894,0.00078464655,0.0001916575,0.00018841567,0.0017152017,0.0019305196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99778396,0.0006219103,0.00017995118,0.0000905624,0.00047451394,0.0008492088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004158212,0.00048858987,0.00034874503,0.0008060238,0.010076897,0.006998054,0.0014063449,0.012073618,0.012190721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007063023,0.00052430644,0.0007276436,0.0006911232,0.0048961877,0.0042104907,0.0059765833,0.0068810172,0.0020577319],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022689695,0.000057129324,0.0009695091,0.00012457039,0.0000060452708,0.0008159548,0.0070545035,0.00009966058,0.00028479917,0.2649505,0.70020026,0.025414359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028248302,0.000048392056,0.0033088867,0.0001586498,0.0000072693347,0.00023206134,0.0041698525,0.000058356265,0.00012021927,0.009327965,0.98250854,0.000031536943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28218293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40451667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28218293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008592754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030455533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56108093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183574380","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1422","title":"Substantive Equality and Jordan’s Principle: Challenges and Complexities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Australian Government","keywords":"Operationalization; Government (linguistics); Public administration; Individualism; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.13650249277374452,"score_gpt":0.39096221217906807,"score_spread":0.2544597194053235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183574380","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04106985,0.009806115,0.10061463,0.48988566,0.0017573307,0.00022374235,0.000069161666,0.00012014926,0.35645345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85126656,0.0038379687,0.04575735,0.067823686,0.001761299,0.00051443966,0.000052739215,0.00015525134,0.028830728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9555843,0.0262331,0.00179936,0.0039138854,0.008925944,0.0035434302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9637911,0.025582796,0.0017212097,0.0032127541,0.0041958103,0.0014964266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0588759,0.0003752772,0.0012172798,0.0013540334,0.015320073,0.015825512,0.0038801837,0.011236601,0.003229347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041201454,0.0006915086,0.0011302033,0.0018255477,0.10503161,0.0144824665,0.011465878,0.023998193,0.0004988161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017803494,0.000003939134,0.000059332844,0.00001151272,0.0000013348043,0.000023594333,0.0018270924,0.00008312932,0.0000129594155,0.9953246,0.000825519,0.0018251905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001051569,0.000011059619,0.00020247197,0.00015545428,0.0000044378908,0.00008012226,0.0032296404,0.00042211177,0.00012542777,0.9338148,0.06191967,0.000024208686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03672797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02887902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96327204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019125782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048122406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31136924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183800558","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1423","title":"An Abortion Law Preformed","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Abortion; Law; Political science; Pregnancy; Biology","score_opus":0.025033402933620847,"score_gpt":0.3658478447504241,"score_spread":0.34081444181680326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183800558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08898382,0.010999647,0.005386477,0.16892195,0.013776489,0.00029764045,0.0008518077,0.00013867769,0.7106436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70661205,0.0036972214,0.0030476393,0.03443585,0.0014119731,0.00015103181,0.000457505,0.00009788298,0.25008884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972504,0.001440867,0.00011342367,0.0002344856,0.0006624787,0.00029830766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973968,0.0018217592,0.00013539132,0.0001553026,0.0003480463,0.00014261618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001538725,0.0002071356,0.00015176421,0.0004935584,0.004225576,0.0018812716,0.0005851985,0.0032997378,0.006184974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069282865,0.00017252352,0.00021913282,0.00033788616,0.004060043,0.0012135145,0.0017241735,0.004444441,0.0008683181],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083792685,0.000050803454,0.0012606808,0.00031790033,0.0000061567544,0.0062120864,0.13436411,0.00015806411,0.0031358928,0.63881356,0.16637293,0.04922411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048292604,0.000038741655,0.0013617913,0.00030937465,0.0000034803236,0.00086664467,0.025610492,0.00009808394,0.0010508324,0.0075400844,0.96309936,0.000016263648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013926679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027588436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013926679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004264153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036237577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030938685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185181445","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1421","title":"Who Owns the City? Pension Fund Capitalism and the Parkdale Rent Strike","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Capitalism; Finance; Business; Sovereign wealth fund; Institutional investor; Landlord; Pension fund; Economics; Market economy; Labour economics; Law; Political science; Corporate governance; Incentive","score_opus":0.046305065365086405,"score_gpt":0.26400810642778855,"score_spread":0.21770304106270214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185181445","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6600621,0.005394181,0.00024919945,0.17161389,0.00029388352,0.000019386196,0.00026179902,0.000008221214,0.1620974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849961,0.001284305,0.000032411597,0.0023547176,0.000081805716,0.000003009124,0.000035090274,0.000003857456,0.011208619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991923,0.00009735535,0.000011445196,0.000057379482,0.00014336809,0.0004981336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897754,0.00019029605,0.00021637794,0.00002665351,0.00011902926,0.00047004176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007435197,0.00008901707,0.00022036563,0.0007017393,0.0067573446,0.006839605,0.0006332286,0.0022389467,0.006290671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022872917,0.00012661082,0.00016883908,0.0010506405,0.004792119,0.0026286193,0.0019454197,0.0029530774,0.00021677025],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015500594,0.0002328039,0.14908354,0.00009714401,0.000051833067,0.0022826677,0.08665743,0.00058514805,0.00024599358,0.5811643,0.12537603,0.05406819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005348127,0.000054444117,0.18294843,0.0004674149,0.00006527147,0.00057536404,0.36061093,0.0011562426,0.00032473146,0.05243754,0.40119934,0.000106945765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7684103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8948975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23158967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019322203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009739438,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4659071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185596930","doi":"","title":"Negotiating Trauma & Teaching Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.057483983902578355,"score_gpt":0.3935547551056512,"score_spread":0.3360707712030728,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185596930","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21837918,0.003660328,0.036392845,0.27525443,0.0015349035,0.00018027268,0.00006743419,0.00018390625,0.4643467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96987826,0.0010436727,0.0028257922,0.006881655,0.00011741872,0.00006505414,0.000024489826,0.00006144793,0.01910221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98487985,0.009379468,0.00038550806,0.00082687876,0.0018003582,0.0027278583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96570057,0.018356172,0.003407953,0.0022263979,0.0025766627,0.0077323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015556026,0.00047961395,0.00049858884,0.0025232476,0.022227475,0.020243576,0.0023005896,0.007443721,0.0294005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049853954,0.0007232819,0.00052526704,0.0013899052,0.049678136,0.017392192,0.020314142,0.014623513,0.0025715786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003836445,0.00036887222,0.009073131,0.00009018377,0.000018969298,0.0011315037,0.14364967,0.00048425692,0.000362043,0.77484816,0.0148894675,0.055045377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023841647,0.00008578659,0.003401171,0.0005270643,0.000016128619,0.0009984592,0.23279366,0.0007468356,0.000720754,0.6343154,0.12633163,0.00003940386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009415915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014901105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0294005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012167276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030883988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09835446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3185936146","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1425","title":"Amadeusz: Inequities in the Enactment and Implementation of Records Suspensions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Disadvantage; Criminal record; Criminology; Indigenous; Limiting; Mentorship; Conviction; Political science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.04184182185988293,"score_gpt":0.40401088268551305,"score_spread":0.3621690608256301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3185936146","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9773542,0.00016056825,0.00031176608,0.007530471,0.00003355556,0.00007142222,0.000060873204,0.000011889328,0.014465317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99621934,0.00008354499,0.00022980629,0.0004179589,0.0000055691057,0.000031210653,0.000022172166,0.0000073268984,0.0029830537],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99342525,0.002350641,0.00019672049,0.00035303307,0.0014194761,0.0022549438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340713,0.0021491852,0.0011992373,0.00044285625,0.0011491134,0.001652435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005737869,0.00013519051,0.00027786323,0.000876986,0.016689336,0.0043602,0.0014537541,0.001104798,0.003586592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018325588,0.00021225418,0.00019258856,0.0011059974,0.005142743,0.0024065033,0.0071242377,0.0014312984,0.00013625223],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011458928,0.00026222918,0.16774791,0.000095408854,0.00001551923,0.0010602567,0.7270844,0.0001788256,0.0007584669,0.032055836,0.0064176805,0.06420889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017688668,0.00012147434,0.14819707,0.0001863972,0.0000136011395,0.00031468258,0.78162724,0.0004724314,0.0003311049,0.0028919652,0.06579003,0.000036332676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6068448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72550976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6068448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023628933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038624883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7909412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186114838","doi":"","title":"Pandemic Evictions: An Analysis of the 2020 Eviction Decisions of Saskatchewan's Office of Residential Tenancies (preprint)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Preprint; Business; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.0631801290180657,"score_gpt":0.44610724449018146,"score_spread":0.3829271154721158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186114838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94728804,0.00051132106,0.00028764608,0.015752405,0.00006664176,0.00020136662,0.0034129838,0.000023201428,0.032456435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98309785,0.00041567034,0.0002146302,0.0046739955,0.000026332362,0.000074256095,0.0009774078,0.0000116619485,0.010508219],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934743,0.0010136837,0.00020272979,0.0002441543,0.0011247814,0.003940398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98250145,0.0092617795,0.0020029573,0.00039134774,0.003348031,0.0024944458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006667447,0.00034729068,0.0005170164,0.0023816288,0.0050488715,0.005824147,0.002596765,0.004655183,0.008110151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01538937,0.0006336591,0.0012173245,0.00463841,0.0021818993,0.0019917332,0.0027492857,0.0053523155,0.0006444231],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020735038,0.0012592748,0.69331497,0.00026735148,0.0010421297,0.004592686,0.011501573,0.032738008,0.0017764176,0.09927251,0.112974524,0.03918704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002089531,0.0005695508,0.834078,0.0003255758,0.00048504127,0.00034350716,0.096694425,0.021144934,0.0014742455,0.0124062905,0.031986922,0.00028251304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8268257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93258846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17317432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039316364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05931124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3483883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189319554","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1268","title":"Reimagining Toronto’s Community Councils","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Stewardship (theology); Public administration; Local government; Corporate governance; Citizen journalism; Function (biology); Power (physics); Political science; Sociology; Government (linguistics); Public relations; Management; Law; Economics; Politics","score_opus":0.05488240855583334,"score_gpt":0.3888048319306447,"score_spread":0.3339224233748114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189319554","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5127559,0.0033583376,0.06516451,0.08353524,0.0033905038,0.0029228332,0.00075542316,0.001140055,0.3269772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91801345,0.00066455716,0.022959834,0.0027555204,0.00017468011,0.0006074952,0.00023320453,0.0001349275,0.054456327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877323,0.00525434,0.00036181457,0.00093644485,0.003386837,0.002328232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97076607,0.005550595,0.0016727436,0.0036744915,0.009076535,0.009259527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011512907,0.0003780111,0.00030466152,0.0017397352,0.012819982,0.009945049,0.0022619027,0.0020806715,0.00706699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019068511,0.0005296895,0.00037116386,0.0019177756,0.013865377,0.003415766,0.007394382,0.0019460272,0.00059522863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001875304,0.00015725907,0.029434761,0.00042059133,0.000051280036,0.001792773,0.1782223,0.0069531193,0.003616219,0.51652825,0.13036798,0.13226795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041910924,0.00014455651,0.015489611,0.00021316482,0.00003957748,0.00017449385,0.050233472,0.0017652338,0.0011512015,0.008527858,0.9221527,0.000066401786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5543403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8324156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92356366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07643634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09005772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89656854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32535063","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1198","title":"Teaching Cultural Competency in Legal Clinics","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05182770238714918,"score_gpt":0.45440144001984967,"score_spread":0.4025737376327005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32535063","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6453896,0.004787605,0.045949668,0.139567,0.001317962,0.0013710936,0.000055859182,0.00041584266,0.16114531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94369334,0.0022707637,0.037753567,0.010893711,0.00020211242,0.0004015491,0.000025203277,0.00003898976,0.0047207526],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98648596,0.009314007,0.00027510186,0.0004831856,0.0016911761,0.001750596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96500534,0.01413127,0.0030282151,0.0013371111,0.0027424989,0.01375554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015530978,0.00031472227,0.00025640926,0.0011352343,0.0070798164,0.004302972,0.0029260712,0.0020520254,0.004439654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032293137,0.00039249333,0.00028279712,0.0006011328,0.0045894785,0.0030817634,0.010214143,0.0049761506,0.0007060862],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000966652,0.0044604177,0.056591816,0.0014196776,0.000029314824,0.0027038194,0.14580916,0.001995996,0.0036948335,0.06878982,0.045735545,0.668673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043551452,0.0032194427,0.097709656,0.011753172,0.00008405781,0.016993154,0.43391538,0.010480217,0.013771441,0.14169954,0.26953533,0.00040310287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007014877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02856067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015530978,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006258531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037395213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08213663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W348736023","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1208","title":"Charter Eviction: Litigating Out of House and Home","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of British Columbia; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Charter; Eviction; Appeal; Political science; Law; Justiciability; Politics","score_opus":0.07835314801454228,"score_gpt":0.36866566256107675,"score_spread":0.29031251454653445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W348736023","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24913608,0.0038273453,0.008256107,0.11006821,0.0015107093,0.000184074,0.00015522672,0.0001218865,0.62674046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9106945,0.00088899,0.0011120586,0.032612797,0.00025748886,0.000055762936,0.000042749372,0.000039608945,0.054296028],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99045485,0.0021333077,0.00018131972,0.0007588067,0.0024206867,0.0040509985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966569,0.0018167552,0.0001488238,0.00021146843,0.00079972233,0.0003662815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061842417,0.00044484762,0.00054846384,0.0008490284,0.027368916,0.007936879,0.0030298522,0.013136847,0.0029517077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012445163,0.00043390892,0.0007277719,0.00089202635,0.019956976,0.0032790005,0.0047672046,0.013563387,0.0002720716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003688428,0.000053984368,0.0032217558,0.00004356076,0.000026255788,0.004666527,0.050727367,0.00056158047,0.00057219947,0.873293,0.055624813,0.011171977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012513627,0.00010386219,0.011183145,0.00063865737,0.00022899978,0.002132943,0.11771435,0.003645908,0.0038516119,0.18693727,0.67318314,0.00025504877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8322069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8723173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8322069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031063389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06203564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3375625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W353839816","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1061","title":"Panhandling for Change in Canadian Law","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06495406747716567,"score_gpt":0.39219049383555005,"score_spread":0.32723642635838435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W353839816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04058162,0.007667669,0.0014271699,0.11458108,0.0014024819,0.00010663662,0.0004933216,0.00013855068,0.8336014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65973884,0.0055711977,0.0016747419,0.026232943,0.00031508942,0.00008923583,0.00034864782,0.000106287975,0.3059231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920798,0.000579539,0.00015205772,0.00085916556,0.0027789527,0.003550374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946049,0.0006099943,0.00023298757,0.00030452842,0.0027315463,0.001516035],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031269628,0.0004644755,0.00046771666,0.0030118679,0.03170017,0.012286242,0.0019687414,0.004247262,0.028855095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0087301815,0.00036113773,0.0006083426,0.0046528503,0.014171346,0.0036566418,0.005752338,0.006089424,0.0010919159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024228719,0.000021478887,0.0046074335,0.00010321987,0.000016416092,0.0004231772,0.018346444,0.0002724959,0.0002824374,0.81065595,0.124199316,0.041047387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013291627,0.000010350937,0.010526071,0.00019934011,0.000018958768,0.00009829531,0.013133877,0.00034426825,0.00016509714,0.021668542,0.953772,0.00004979806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.992324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99630934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.199502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.199502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27304086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92846423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W418860208","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1003","title":"Age Discrimination and Income-Security Benefits: The Long Retreat from Tetreault-Gadoury?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Retirement, Disability, and Employment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Demographic economics; Economics; Psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.10765314394162981,"score_gpt":0.40847845253986353,"score_spread":0.30082530859823375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W418860208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1857242,0.03748848,0.00091752113,0.57090366,0.0023049077,0.000028132134,0.00023177869,0.000019626083,0.20238174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85362816,0.011717864,0.00034748315,0.0769196,0.0014908613,0.000026045927,0.00007055873,0.0000311113,0.055768397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730814,0.0003603558,0.000043781412,0.00028602537,0.00068368093,0.0013180124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792564,0.00053907454,0.00022381703,0.00011685159,0.00037157745,0.0008231268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033979104,0.0001911579,0.00049440714,0.0009420324,0.008621676,0.008871553,0.0010211387,0.005755625,0.0067172092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062157637,0.00018650743,0.00037331114,0.0014545226,0.020555342,0.0052848593,0.004489256,0.009203407,0.00040616925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006939005,0.000041798437,0.0068163085,0.000040845207,0.0000067340725,0.00031178165,0.02098729,0.00006800089,0.00013023372,0.9031142,0.021074405,0.047339033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004746551,0.00007911798,0.053444356,0.0012120311,0.000023726432,0.0003017942,0.04693235,0.0001986548,0.00030621645,0.13034648,0.7670288,0.00007895253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61334676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7878067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38665324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026604947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038439043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77786064},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W430697676","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1064","title":"See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Remedy No Evil: How the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal is Failing to Protect the Most Fundamental Rights of Residential Tenants","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Fair Housing Act; Renting; Rental housing; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Civil rights","score_opus":0.03292165400689023,"score_gpt":0.32288142651925045,"score_spread":0.2899597725123602,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W430697676","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087738246,0.009699565,0.0022742087,0.26573768,0.0006450138,0.00008434574,0.0001967712,0.000051372706,0.63357276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8023319,0.0034952327,0.00066372653,0.026656035,0.0001557859,0.000069692505,0.000039227125,0.000042969157,0.16654539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683964,0.00078061974,0.000056177076,0.00023363804,0.0006345577,0.0014552838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856645,0.000507587,0.00010675133,0.00008044868,0.00040143557,0.00033739043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022752255,0.0002695624,0.0002586685,0.0004960619,0.026017822,0.007244671,0.0015634529,0.009355386,0.006419672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042880513,0.00030202026,0.00026849692,0.0008077241,0.023322513,0.0030375794,0.0027775986,0.004461318,0.000646321],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024878604,0.000018150857,0.0026174325,0.000084527215,0.000009345648,0.0008660694,0.06053951,0.00021831511,0.0003485139,0.8390808,0.08538592,0.010806574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000487281,0.000032953103,0.014562961,0.00037045823,0.00004418351,0.00021206446,0.08743636,0.00055274786,0.00054753805,0.096723884,0.79939514,0.00007300591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9241551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97928417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075844884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048758835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057014164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35377175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080596","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1448","title":"Introduction to the Special Issue on Housing Precarity and Human Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Precarity; Conversation; Human rights; Scholarship; Intersection (aeronautics); Sociology; Political science; Gender studies; Criminology; Law; Geography; Cartography","score_opus":0.05640807776497122,"score_gpt":0.44322630168952004,"score_spread":0.38681822392454884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080596","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002728895,0.024740733,0.0006074926,0.14275384,0.79186773,0.00009256899,0.00044412015,0.00010974989,0.039110858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016274204,0.01782837,0.0003535196,0.03943001,0.8908991,0.00013891306,0.00038767367,0.0001675279,0.049167447],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728954,0.0004920585,0.0002709094,0.00035717638,0.0012455701,0.00034469162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98534805,0.008195804,0.0008159528,0.0005858255,0.0029717963,0.002082637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003285627,0.001998577,0.0022903124,0.005000884,0.004880855,0.011307532,0.0025444455,0.009266161,0.06702656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012105425,0.0008174081,0.0018132214,0.0032817677,0.0036170545,0.007274304,0.0045512915,0.013217665,0.023106916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038075502,0.000014039901,0.00006430329,0.000089827474,0.0000031475577,0.000027571336,0.0000779099,0.0000124394455,0.000026363532,0.0015491509,0.99276286,0.0053686113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054982424,0.000017825185,0.0007016975,0.0005040172,0.0000073759807,0.00009329589,0.00022815364,0.00003294324,0.00002067081,0.0028112545,0.995564,0.000013348039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004656595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009172933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06702656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043595997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004602541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22422618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080598","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1454","title":"Property Says No: Relational (In)Equality, Encampments, and Property Rights","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Mining and Resource Management","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Public property; Political science; Property law; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03307264102321693,"score_gpt":0.26913221870129217,"score_spread":0.23605957767807523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0881113,0.0038461608,0.01671204,0.09435257,0.00034030556,0.00004462424,0.000084015475,0.000031675572,0.7964774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97475195,0.0005968533,0.00072897004,0.0040732753,0.00011855472,0.000025357884,0.000016350124,0.000013162223,0.019675633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944701,0.002334485,0.00019051686,0.00083784224,0.00082284806,0.0013441461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657094,0.0015870128,0.00046225177,0.00048311826,0.0004881097,0.00040852345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004460147,0.00020883571,0.00038711188,0.0006134254,0.0073674573,0.007973902,0.0012304052,0.0045350143,0.0077895084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008056685,0.00023542116,0.0003383155,0.0008532887,0.056800183,0.011851931,0.007271319,0.0044420487,0.0004623624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034122725,0.000004059143,0.00023035564,0.000007163301,0.0000014886698,0.000042353957,0.001596997,0.000047289144,0.000029657238,0.9962637,0.00054009433,0.0012334078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009253474,0.000022249069,0.0017532732,0.00013547631,0.000011787915,0.00014143226,0.007884364,0.00026030128,0.00026118776,0.91885555,0.07064679,0.000018368415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04033378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040482976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04033378,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007553083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006307221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08019799},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080600","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1450","title":"The Colonialism of Eviction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; University of Victoria","funders":"Durham University","keywords":"Eviction; Colonialism; Indigenous; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology; Scholarship; Law; Criminology; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02718088927478287,"score_gpt":0.37615082545951395,"score_spread":0.3489699361847311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3089158,0.009628148,0.008761793,0.045289785,0.00034370902,0.000050970117,0.00008254186,0.0000742261,0.626853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910759,0.0009671379,0.000358408,0.00094908185,0.000032435233,0.000006716152,0.000007252437,0.000015022542,0.006587994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955907,0.0014129124,0.00011604563,0.00042192894,0.00083799916,0.0016203524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970872,0.0010413802,0.00035672274,0.00036766322,0.00065745885,0.00048968336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033258372,0.00018896368,0.00033754666,0.0009658861,0.016485702,0.006506769,0.0011186491,0.0012076889,0.0031293898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068011736,0.00019602745,0.00019188615,0.0010521534,0.07768497,0.0025537456,0.00589089,0.0029207782,0.00012341082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014025496,0.000009874259,0.004849822,0.00007782135,0.000009239457,0.00036829422,0.09546674,0.00021540326,0.00023602883,0.87922597,0.0030682757,0.016458578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026961827,0.000040701012,0.03822014,0.0013364599,0.000049368842,0.0009093592,0.15145895,0.000940469,0.0009102329,0.25573358,0.5502805,0.00009326012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.761632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80452317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.761632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03299771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038178448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4795435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080605","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1452","title":"When Should Publicly Owned Land Be Considered Private in Homeless Encampment Cases? A Critique of Recent Developments in BC","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Supreme court; Covenant; Charter; Political science; Jurisprudence; Government (linguistics); Interlocutory; Sociology","score_opus":0.13780281839369996,"score_gpt":0.3922041117613699,"score_spread":0.2544012933676699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080605","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046933122,0.009464229,0.008289416,0.719829,0.0017206694,0.00006155168,0.00013866903,0.00005129355,0.21351196],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8370415,0.00360967,0.0033030524,0.13412112,0.0022423773,0.00010902853,0.000076452765,0.00010040167,0.019396296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97471493,0.007872199,0.0012420284,0.0037668252,0.008354274,0.004049718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96564275,0.020485101,0.0015483676,0.0022162902,0.007976796,0.0021306528],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019445669,0.00037760212,0.00087889953,0.0029478315,0.014642092,0.020440727,0.0059006102,0.01806186,0.003762367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053649504,0.0006529344,0.0005725635,0.002986568,0.054375764,0.013797214,0.0069716154,0.027390974,0.0006278322],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134099355,0.000018986613,0.00060537405,0.000048435766,0.0000055932014,0.00009581277,0.006520872,0.00013992116,0.000071850496,0.96883607,0.01436238,0.009281282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053480322,0.000034321212,0.00409542,0.00133834,0.000039084636,0.00022267025,0.013972408,0.0016347688,0.00071514264,0.6693597,0.30845168,0.00008288576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33583543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3659072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66416454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04213089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02898963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6677613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080606","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1451","title":"Intersections between Precarious Housing and Residential Tenancy Law: A Review of A Complex Exile and Recent Legal Scholarship on Residential Tenancies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Leasehold estate; Scholarship; Conversation; Statutory law; Sociology; Precarity; Law; Political science; Law and economics","score_opus":0.15438448970353363,"score_gpt":0.3606752943222165,"score_spread":0.20629080461868288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080606","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018199932,0.99571663,0.000049858303,0.002048728,0.00013993245,0.0000020543587,0.000009193265,0.0000015257905,0.0018501232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003136138,0.99551326,0.000059847986,0.00069397077,0.00019939496,0.0000027353576,0.000014126583,0.000001725621,0.0003788764],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864405,0.00034289432,0.00009553312,0.00012123148,0.00068880274,0.00010753212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957469,0.0027110113,0.00032836947,0.00006769866,0.0010125074,0.00013352638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002057358,0.0004918027,0.00086332153,0.005543812,0.0012616154,0.0029337646,0.00093139056,0.0017661975,0.0024063932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047784755,0.00036795015,0.00034778102,0.012314049,0.0051086857,0.0030005404,0.0011827056,0.0022490944,0.0004642907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004072965,0.00005865887,0.0017085068,0.030178683,0.00012557827,0.00027516007,0.003384806,0.001014932,0.00036017655,0.16853404,0.12658586,0.66773295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033649842,0.000019780166,0.004010528,0.016270088,0.000042282198,0.00019318136,0.001381977,0.00008059451,0.00005830988,0.006691442,0.9712261,0.000022470218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18534492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35291693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18534492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009662758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019951964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36853224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080617","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1453","title":"Homeless Encampments: A Philosophical Justification","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Poison control; Coercion (linguistics); Law; Sociology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.05884370915141079,"score_gpt":0.38698545180383065,"score_spread":0.32814174265241985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05882587,0.019006869,0.054371644,0.33938938,0.0011979846,0.00012082529,0.0002787748,0.00006076746,0.52674794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562814,0.0035522755,0.008408345,0.0137057025,0.00059840403,0.00008899022,0.00005578141,0.000031908658,0.017277228],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598557,0.0019811662,0.00014703714,0.00046738694,0.00095472357,0.00046412155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99455714,0.0034185566,0.0003635614,0.00029276736,0.0011104336,0.00025759745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058403043,0.00054561225,0.0004844026,0.0019943442,0.008694547,0.0050947205,0.0015841495,0.007270115,0.0042533567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070958636,0.00033933626,0.00056897436,0.0012620968,0.05581585,0.0076535875,0.0032380142,0.006667621,0.0003926389],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016873546,0.000003240782,0.000069181035,0.000014986611,0.0000013124072,0.000035872858,0.0016359027,0.00006570055,0.000021658552,0.99596304,0.0012367659,0.0009506748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011955318,0.000009928297,0.00044111948,0.00018097128,0.0000082558,0.00011737412,0.0039931126,0.0007736006,0.00010033032,0.91365665,0.08068423,0.000022369966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049727485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05939841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049727485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014526054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008271606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10539442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385080619","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1449","title":"‘Somebody’s street’: Eviction of Homeless Encampments as a Reflection of Interlocking Colonial and Class Relations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Political science; Colonialism; Criminalization; Sociology; Politics; Gender studies; Indigenous; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.06466532655846849,"score_gpt":0.4627746964803637,"score_spread":0.39810936992189516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385080619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835504,0.0005305595,0.00036030883,0.0047821635,0.000052760242,0.000018776827,0.000021164695,0.000014994697,0.010668734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966108,0.0002524908,0.00010865088,0.00076255325,0.000012101309,0.000008802051,0.000012815534,0.00001328572,0.0022184688],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969021,0.0014045015,0.000064647065,0.00021717185,0.0003794171,0.0010321685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792176,0.0008064027,0.000348518,0.00011151087,0.0003026956,0.00050914416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022361139,0.00046812787,0.0006345317,0.0013152331,0.027998397,0.00725402,0.0022236914,0.002670715,0.002129981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004493906,0.0006108726,0.00026727174,0.0013752575,0.050362304,0.0039047883,0.007972454,0.0069595403,0.00016948913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003116294,0.000005650882,0.0007401876,0.000008766609,9.923581e-7,0.00035909397,0.99648845,0.000005949869,0.00009421793,0.0015282342,0.00027169424,0.0004936019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.485387e-7,0.000004146361,0.0011514951,0.000023810377,0.0000012097454,0.000116295385,0.99464005,0.000012006157,0.000043888016,0.00021179377,0.0037899488,0.000004740195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46754977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6141685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46754977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014956707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011951297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9296566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510767","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1424","title":"Pandemic Evictions: An Analysis of the 2020 Eviction Decisions of Saskatchewan’s Office of Residential Tenancies","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Pandemic; Government (linguistics); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Business; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.058156177580634745,"score_gpt":0.4301284038996559,"score_spread":0.37197222631902116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9694667,0.0005646999,0.00014033949,0.009694304,0.00007535826,0.000111390545,0.0010800668,0.0000083977775,0.018858714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857092,0.0011291304,0.00017518518,0.0035780165,0.00002842472,0.00007624134,0.00070422207,0.000015879237,0.008583708],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99749327,0.0006286207,0.000111565714,0.00014973716,0.00055926625,0.0010575929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99273056,0.0024128894,0.0012657989,0.00016288935,0.0018641347,0.001563676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024680276,0.00021941424,0.00016489555,0.0015325798,0.0066524534,0.003612529,0.0015550819,0.0010598591,0.0040401914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054939073,0.00034749453,0.0002671008,0.0031766167,0.0023791296,0.0017494306,0.0031243092,0.002730463,0.0004712289],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035916874,0.00033821142,0.50214684,0.00036357806,0.00010218678,0.0038667046,0.37593725,0.0005803166,0.0016196507,0.0074699726,0.053068016,0.05414813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007922383,0.000045139022,0.26258662,0.00021876518,0.000010493821,0.000117548254,0.7098489,0.00023610998,0.000167787,0.00027255694,0.026445415,0.000042842174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7794603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92408645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22053969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031768207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048090525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44367695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385510775","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1426","title":"Negotiating Trauma & Teaching Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Legal education; Mental health; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Law; Reflexivity; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science; Psychotherapist; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.07473822658891317,"score_gpt":0.40410784692831275,"score_spread":0.3293696203393996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385510775","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12686466,0.0079640495,0.03894723,0.416782,0.0040480117,0.00030577154,0.0000755661,0.00084975315,0.40416303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86754245,0.004548561,0.011701043,0.04082537,0.0006305852,0.00037129704,0.00005125597,0.00023412608,0.0740954],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98584634,0.009689797,0.00023753534,0.0006438378,0.0018815832,0.0017009585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98609805,0.0059151514,0.0016133016,0.0007605595,0.0009770333,0.0046360265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010224914,0.00044493482,0.00037646305,0.0013057746,0.015949816,0.015496604,0.0022328745,0.005190907,0.018921493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025590526,0.0005628389,0.00059815805,0.0008113435,0.024662992,0.01299999,0.013476603,0.012185331,0.005315449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003460257,0.00067434594,0.0052036936,0.00025210905,0.000022713988,0.0012838914,0.48830277,0.0003050102,0.0012096935,0.20325957,0.14500423,0.15444732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023768838,0.00009422775,0.002364667,0.0005474095,0.000011459666,0.0011306453,0.4724565,0.00054413354,0.0009409897,0.100673124,0.42115963,0.000053459287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041243564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008898934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018921493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007969474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008040927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0632987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511708","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1400","title":"The Jail Accountability & Information Line: Early Reflections on Praxis","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Accountability; Hotline; Political science; Prison; Criminalization; Commission; Context (archaeology); Solidarity; Criminology; Public administration; Economic Justice; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.07263124975284106,"score_gpt":0.40821437929065163,"score_spread":0.33558312953781055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511708","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046046205,0.0059373025,0.00399192,0.7984336,0.0025529617,0.00008235498,0.00012331495,0.00013929827,0.14269294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8506196,0.002907299,0.0020203753,0.08756184,0.0013271633,0.00017967867,0.000053528154,0.000209555,0.055120956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9749017,0.016495964,0.0005881951,0.0009971296,0.0029431111,0.004073944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95397645,0.03185039,0.002781262,0.0017916549,0.005751214,0.0038490975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01816272,0.00046815892,0.0003485006,0.0021087613,0.030557066,0.025127115,0.00221527,0.011364746,0.0060667875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040084127,0.0006471413,0.00038189848,0.002480517,0.05157685,0.016860249,0.009425692,0.021685772,0.0008570934],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035089382,0.00007372878,0.00231812,0.00014537128,0.0000050141634,0.00061296765,0.3038386,0.00011134635,0.00020940453,0.53612703,0.13339393,0.023129284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010270402,0.000055501787,0.004328069,0.00056353473,0.0000059567183,0.00018368951,0.19885133,0.00024821755,0.00039849323,0.028193459,0.76708925,0.000072210634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12984647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17522201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12984647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03351806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024852369,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25818133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511835","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1379","title":"ACCLE and Bill C-75: Implications for Student Legal Clinics & Communities in Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.16372624617413442,"score_gpt":0.47797874237364124,"score_spread":0.3142524961995068,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511835","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016373232,0.002541611,0.00055376516,0.92918336,0.0025746713,0.00021217573,0.0007794221,0.00010459449,0.047677245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2001718,0.0043477523,0.0040255524,0.7064436,0.0012362151,0.00030181755,0.0007398485,0.00010955789,0.08262388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9761499,0.0021553342,0.0006511423,0.0013104606,0.0081282575,0.011604747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9333624,0.00693571,0.0015693827,0.000845031,0.019918151,0.03736921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011580468,0.0006314273,0.00058387336,0.0018588966,0.03011608,0.01185997,0.00710188,0.020449089,0.020857742],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035539705,0.00083666376,0.0016454511,0.002662048,0.009533794,0.0034712497,0.0075289872,0.013227626,0.0014278861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014375479,0.00034156383,0.021215996,0.00037007465,0.000043212644,0.0023109051,0.0073953047,0.0015321668,0.00057133357,0.1404696,0.75958556,0.06602059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002816475,0.00025122327,0.064344145,0.0021608071,0.00009949391,0.00062841317,0.033389654,0.0022245701,0.00039820155,0.018209362,0.87764746,0.00036509626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9939156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18072109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18072109,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5875546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9502474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511836","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1374","title":"Introduction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.028462825135497416,"score_gpt":0.3155854556159174,"score_spread":0.28712263048041997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00128366,0.0010029942,0.0027099345,0.018196741,0.0051276037,0.00013519237,0.002645034,0.0004234101,0.96847534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011538049,0.00093204883,0.0014873147,0.008996019,0.0016057126,0.00016012251,0.0016807193,0.000200857,0.97339916],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842405,0.00024384583,0.00004625053,0.0003273072,0.00071360567,0.00024490038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762625,0.0004363477,0.00010380003,0.00027484357,0.0010900139,0.00046882214],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017249074,0.0005546152,0.0003194036,0.0014249982,0.00233189,0.0061708135,0.0014796758,0.0026033141,0.48699704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053270156,0.0002347353,0.00048097596,0.0012210413,0.0014123161,0.0027749913,0.002845847,0.0024315906,0.2630896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043155796,0.000045800083,0.0006162805,0.00014825606,0.0000027985698,0.00007790129,0.0006019639,0.00007963694,0.0002567297,0.18563066,0.7183849,0.094112016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033582603,0.0000082210445,0.0003784852,0.000080609316,0.0000011354863,0.00002956776,0.00023044168,0.000021210613,0.00007479869,0.0077142823,0.9914541,0.0000037510147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005108063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006275871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.513003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022169412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003939181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7317364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385511837","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1380","title":"ACCLE Past, Present, and Future: Reflections from ACCLE’s Board Presidents","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership","field":"Nursing","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; York University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Political science; On board; History; Archaeology","score_opus":0.0739648677854137,"score_gpt":0.39170666777445423,"score_spread":0.3177417999890405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385511837","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037532058,0.007989742,0.00025181175,0.9216934,0.020843955,0.000047230802,0.00006407084,0.000029332985,0.011548441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34178415,0.008871724,0.0008610989,0.60813296,0.011742695,0.00012853771,0.00008608266,0.0001427021,0.028250048],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9634092,0.012885274,0.0011115615,0.0017927166,0.009179763,0.011621463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91013324,0.016559193,0.0036153994,0.0012426308,0.021281956,0.047167566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026948191,0.0006017949,0.00091055303,0.0013766886,0.04653295,0.016784538,0.0030493,0.023150811,0.0044942093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05827483,0.0012379262,0.0010409823,0.0018520304,0.014349132,0.0078093796,0.0082256,0.04880326,0.0010157934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058471993,0.0002639195,0.0052787024,0.00018521976,0.000034835033,0.0024885577,0.16229549,0.00010750032,0.0004738425,0.011839123,0.79994655,0.017027885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018870614,0.00009001414,0.00523623,0.0005385059,0.000018623447,0.00082774356,0.2392083,0.0001507998,0.00029808714,0.001072166,0.7523712,0.00016937763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26517105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42558375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73482895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029921995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05447374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5272552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512173","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1366","title":"How Affirmative Action Context Shapes Collegiate Outcomes at America’s Selective Colleges and Universities","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Higher Education Research Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs, Syracuse University; Syracuse University; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Affirmative action; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Higher education; Political science; Action (physics); Law; History","score_opus":0.03351142535275058,"score_gpt":0.3849638267295667,"score_spread":0.3514524013768161,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99529845,0.000072184164,0.00009068346,0.00070230657,0.000009759865,0.000011732239,0.00035069263,0.0000052344567,0.0034589518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847215,0.000044748427,0.00004671423,0.00017214198,0.000015603648,0.000017373293,0.00044366208,0.000004365906,0.00078322995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99573934,0.001340823,0.00015966163,0.0006084194,0.00089700916,0.0012547119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730162,0.0075505525,0.009421931,0.0015669722,0.002474357,0.0059699775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004916854,0.00027505192,0.00060562906,0.0019622236,0.003794542,0.005308223,0.0011186955,0.001083565,0.006481286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023917472,0.00019351904,0.00036572004,0.0034596552,0.0020582548,0.0023213474,0.0053033307,0.0020887384,0.0011183646],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024246852,0.00079776015,0.97835916,0.00002743275,0.00009149222,0.000077387995,0.0049236757,0.00038231094,0.00033823165,0.0023875528,0.0028158766,0.009556763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021960752,0.0001497184,0.9819833,0.000027921682,0.000028851837,0.000027814682,0.01102932,0.00042159457,0.00036308178,0.0023048474,0.0036177097,0.00002388532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044111963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063295215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044111963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022241338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033181724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08771044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512271","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1343","title":"Issue 2: A Human Right to Self-Government over First Nations Child and Family Services and Beyond: Implications of the Caring Society Case","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Tribunal; Government (linguistics); Human services; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; Child protection; Public administration; Economic growth; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.012023446822483264,"score_gpt":0.3079686206259714,"score_spread":0.29594517380348817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512271","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040687032,0.0032394894,0.0014799114,0.4996472,0.0031113632,0.00015173822,0.00014574635,0.00003304211,0.45150447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4869053,0.0025405118,0.0017137013,0.37919337,0.0020471704,0.00030483335,0.0000837686,0.00007975241,0.12713164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98885125,0.0020419685,0.00028430458,0.0011129647,0.0034807245,0.0042287577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373055,0.0037545487,0.00026862518,0.00028483357,0.0008338792,0.0011275334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077022333,0.0004453188,0.0006929058,0.0010213095,0.030297844,0.013701955,0.0036904574,0.03162333,0.009300785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012518727,0.0004953735,0.001110368,0.0010207177,0.025547625,0.0065022884,0.0067602415,0.024624582,0.00068600214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010524215,0.000056973462,0.00093334226,0.00004125686,0.000004960173,0.0012313164,0.014574958,0.00015086829,0.00014038417,0.9341087,0.045182213,0.0035643883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006600749,0.000043070188,0.005700021,0.0009040233,0.00004713664,0.0013451403,0.041295093,0.0007224351,0.000805585,0.16465491,0.78425777,0.0001588327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.56040806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6269122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43959194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026147593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057423294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88436157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512565","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1312","title":"Learning, Teaching & Practising Systemic Advocacy in Legal Clinics: A Conversation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Windsor; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Conversation; Windsor; Public relations; Legal education; Political science; Medicine; Systemic therapy; Medical education; Sociology; Nursing; Law","score_opus":0.0518633316414894,"score_gpt":0.45091875470452697,"score_spread":0.39905542306303754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512565","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057600867,0.0015960159,0.00593243,0.8885341,0.0014668398,0.000095663,0.000017812927,0.00006350271,0.044692658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8716409,0.0025871762,0.004871807,0.10775963,0.00076852844,0.00018890461,0.000010908437,0.00007211973,0.012099952],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9460952,0.044744164,0.0006801511,0.0013864896,0.0025707807,0.0045232084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9599039,0.026017526,0.0019844838,0.00063144736,0.0021243999,0.009338285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04360287,0.0005326376,0.0005769713,0.0012311238,0.0459427,0.02616694,0.0033249413,0.016937962,0.0047218236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03354202,0.00076056336,0.0005163791,0.0013272996,0.071046345,0.020250585,0.017081643,0.02929948,0.00085319567],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139766225,0.00012975451,0.0013454917,0.00011549325,0.000005590188,0.00085345004,0.8360997,0.00013196349,0.00040192375,0.118536994,0.026944043,0.015421558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000113322,0.000046064808,0.00045114834,0.00029321274,0.0000038436483,0.00032504665,0.84012324,0.00035190798,0.00019405775,0.017298708,0.14086434,0.000037162914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040526655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060843747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0459427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023503138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04157875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23059678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512623","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1296","title":"Issue 1: Explaining the Economic Disparity Gap in the Rate of Substantiated Child Maltreatment in Canada","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Child Abuse and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Socioeconomic status; Demography; Welfare; Psychology; Poverty; Harm; Medicine; Demographic economics; Psychiatry; Population; Political science; Economics; Economic growth; Social psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.03056519418895662,"score_gpt":0.3152222353705845,"score_spread":0.2846570411816279,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512623","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80822355,0.024311755,0.0066180234,0.06687844,0.0020729655,0.0010921062,0.05217448,0.00031397873,0.038314786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774993,0.0039959536,0.0036569382,0.002686133,0.0003293869,0.00018982975,0.008220103,0.00013383057,0.0032885273],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191815,0.0014806361,0.00080386933,0.0011544916,0.0028400773,0.0018028939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97030896,0.0077571087,0.0057972865,0.0019032797,0.012124211,0.002109221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0112183215,0.0005958646,0.0013350683,0.006577232,0.005195255,0.0050299508,0.003806347,0.0015791535,0.0057179527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058299147,0.0005829342,0.002266248,0.012706469,0.0019640827,0.001277248,0.002932292,0.0019698893,0.00042155944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056577115,0.000052766307,0.96302086,0.00021133997,0.0002406722,0.00017874545,0.0016589634,0.00046064385,0.00003540951,0.002915503,0.014005583,0.017162839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003832234,0.00002119366,0.9701155,0.0007590071,0.0002701434,0.00025911393,0.0038291344,0.0050822143,0.00016602027,0.0018564375,0.017542511,0.000060431223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99134046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9874255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036659606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036659606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09758354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2659853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518156","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1189","title":"The E-Team Project: A Teamwork Approach to Clinical Legal Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Teamwork; Notice; Legal education; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Public relations; Passion; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Law; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07516484529182203,"score_gpt":0.4836582694816039,"score_spread":0.40849342418978185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518156","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11042455,0.0016741557,0.5280631,0.06808098,0.0027585335,0.003868284,0.00015191842,0.0016487829,0.2833297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57909507,0.0015945811,0.36175278,0.006019318,0.00048215594,0.002738804,0.0001797632,0.0002970125,0.047840618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794136,0.016701387,0.00034951032,0.00097250595,0.0011557668,0.0014071411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98044395,0.0076810997,0.0007198981,0.0012702795,0.0010220795,0.008862735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144240465,0.0006298057,0.00035148568,0.0023349405,0.010071762,0.008198523,0.0038569514,0.003110825,0.013165034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013005621,0.00049157866,0.0006128051,0.0015507755,0.013024204,0.005097956,0.014544502,0.0041663866,0.0025963788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017070519,0.0033673847,0.007736388,0.00083237333,0.00006710212,0.0026215443,0.17532228,0.0038882738,0.0015661743,0.17092444,0.11649704,0.5170062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040074746,0.0013197133,0.0069960793,0.0012610639,0.000030829564,0.0018674759,0.21595274,0.0059504085,0.0014203546,0.1537199,0.61094266,0.00013809408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055587906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018818935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0144240465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045654853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019967439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07628256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518171","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1255","title":"Charter Litigation, Social and Economic Rights & Civil Procedure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Charter; Appeal; Political science; Law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Human rights","score_opus":0.04032466827155654,"score_gpt":0.34451172540794245,"score_spread":0.3041870571363859,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018898726,0.010662077,0.0118451305,0.066568084,0.0009948108,0.00013447813,0.00013490357,0.000086852524,0.890675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85787845,0.008944528,0.005784171,0.026811505,0.0015591445,0.00017641557,0.00009640593,0.000054549873,0.09869494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847526,0.0031612597,0.00037780768,0.001315737,0.0052474667,0.0051450906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949882,0.0028872774,0.00042674268,0.00041238312,0.00089756085,0.00038783692],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065720403,0.0006057353,0.0005234126,0.0018857277,0.017044414,0.016842512,0.0024449166,0.012476792,0.008896071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010645518,0.0003211027,0.00093932834,0.002718188,0.04549926,0.0052681216,0.0050708847,0.00892339,0.0006601847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015023772,0.0000038418,0.00010219659,0.000008415369,0.000001007756,0.00012874852,0.0006513706,0.00012378093,0.00003395617,0.99413764,0.002776074,0.0020315112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002409965,0.000042014344,0.0028353115,0.00040363343,0.000023531373,0.0005936865,0.006088699,0.0016079609,0.0005048147,0.63795555,0.3498359,0.000084837724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64169234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66837925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64169234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04225827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05668699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72083557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385518246","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1228","title":"Book Review: Women’s Rights to Social Security and Social Protection, edited by Beth Goldblatt & Lucie Lamarche","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Policy and Reform Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Social security; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026427584752201635,"score_gpt":0.3437891635255739,"score_spread":0.3173615787733723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385518246","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000093163486,0.8899886,0.00020476714,0.04344195,0.04017638,0.00002442758,0.000243428,0.000025580408,0.025801726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018629825,0.765106,0.00037861694,0.021249942,0.026855007,0.000077211334,0.0003655254,0.000075470365,0.1840292],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990288,0.00024061634,0.000055046617,0.00012158588,0.00047606384,0.00007792598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976119,0.001217796,0.000118769654,0.000059618025,0.00082066975,0.0001712439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013825848,0.0013473135,0.0018219607,0.003730506,0.0011421039,0.003522466,0.0012447052,0.0032292844,0.03107703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004389412,0.0006792662,0.00047864547,0.0051498613,0.0016505356,0.0030470889,0.0014659594,0.003558806,0.014969534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006319219,0.00000746327,0.000020518975,0.00039008568,0.0000039896045,0.000010392939,0.000040365303,0.000028235045,0.000037341237,0.0021645166,0.96948695,0.027803853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004204169,0.0000060639186,0.00016024601,0.00094354467,0.0000046949044,0.00003902685,0.000058577858,0.0000129569535,0.000025252019,0.0011457253,0.99759465,0.0000050510876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025309734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07267951,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03107703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004188504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077972487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10396302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409081055","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1494","title":"Mary Jane Mossman’s Quiet Rebels: A History of Ontario Women Lawyers (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2024)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Canadian Identity and History","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; Political science; Media studies; Law; Sociology; History; Physics","score_opus":0.012043075870505326,"score_gpt":0.22651986554812747,"score_spread":0.21447678967762215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409081055","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02229841,0.19299522,0.00047296446,0.46463162,0.00553544,0.00011155544,0.0006341491,0.000088953406,0.3132317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17122832,0.07633272,0.00041111498,0.035297107,0.0009661713,0.00010509823,0.00020478976,0.00014937954,0.71530527],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679655,0.0006058733,0.00006891417,0.00018597441,0.0010573149,0.0012853558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99746907,0.00039102833,0.00018500381,0.00006842824,0.0005837849,0.0013026374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002279644,0.0005420382,0.00037998596,0.0019469508,0.033374954,0.00692559,0.0017856176,0.0036823591,0.019085072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039186855,0.0007706893,0.00022583238,0.0041791727,0.013837401,0.0040930756,0.0033692599,0.0041230284,0.0023760307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029115014,0.000025903335,0.0013269244,0.00015889644,0.0000056052004,0.00034452495,0.104558304,0.000037034886,0.00013117242,0.03929894,0.8184845,0.035599116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019441306,0.0000035233816,0.0023011407,0.0001398207,0.0000016659934,0.000033108376,0.021713303,0.0000054970997,0.000019134246,0.00052177423,0.9752509,0.00000811532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98013705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11707739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11707739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14907502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8494599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409081068","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1490","title":"Probative of Prejudice: Procedural Unfairness Underlying Security Threat Group Classifications in Canadian Prisons","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Prejudice (legal term); Group (periodic table); Social psychology; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Computer security; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.06450815909641282,"score_gpt":0.4076119381828813,"score_spread":0.34310377908646844,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409081068","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91672915,0.0006525729,0.0017176624,0.016781898,0.00006540879,0.00011623759,0.00013069368,0.000013278719,0.06379298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975834,0.00016591261,0.00026200307,0.00055235205,0.000013188401,0.000011338534,0.000018362636,0.000004326841,0.00138899],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98675925,0.0022864542,0.00044107705,0.001023144,0.0056586205,0.0038313803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97328013,0.0072943284,0.0070160413,0.0016431212,0.008156283,0.002610094],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011181241,0.0003039962,0.00039048193,0.0026339116,0.01934148,0.0056099435,0.0026423791,0.0023181604,0.004166646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05393129,0.00037227714,0.00060290436,0.0023945803,0.015786925,0.00213482,0.0056373333,0.004384971,0.00013922631],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027218464,0.00025714625,0.4812244,0.00023919171,0.0001859929,0.0011068644,0.18034679,0.0012587886,0.0012511392,0.24457262,0.010014921,0.07927004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039236715,0.000093587034,0.77124506,0.0007972905,0.00032349554,0.00040480835,0.15622653,0.0028195179,0.0011741209,0.037781797,0.028899914,0.00019470607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9749552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98725045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066897854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.066897854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081115566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48538017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409081083","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1493","title":"Navigating the Paths to Justice: A Study on the Role of Social Supports in Responding to Justiciable Events","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Social justice; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Social psychology; Public relations; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.02408453312693147,"score_gpt":0.4089622230107402,"score_spread":0.3848776898838087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409081083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936752,0.000144294,0.00025235084,0.0014231389,0.000026137299,0.00012782021,0.00003857115,0.000006043355,0.00430642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99618703,0.00026461945,0.00038446186,0.00057149975,0.000009764824,0.000062239975,0.000025483527,0.000011605806,0.0024832883],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939818,0.0031226026,0.000118081916,0.0003308832,0.0006691113,0.0017775075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98996335,0.00559612,0.0007929908,0.00021882006,0.0010910755,0.0023376183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005275623,0.0005112569,0.0007234025,0.0015472398,0.025633762,0.0054751034,0.0025779281,0.0022395945,0.0027759548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011468132,0.0006117643,0.0003111606,0.0017458659,0.016607523,0.0025853566,0.004876658,0.004144336,0.00021735534],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001641063,0.00004450397,0.0023993088,0.00003281861,0.000001904722,0.00027226444,0.99489635,0.000009784797,0.00021895325,0.00029771874,0.00019245262,0.0016174638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030322412,0.000027055858,0.002490883,0.000030734354,0.0000022296128,0.00004772239,0.99468577,0.00002306943,0.000051459123,0.00006596483,0.0025649073,0.0000071177565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6081835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8098168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6081835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01664692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02736103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78824794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W5293378","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1192","title":"When Law Reform Is Not Enough: A Case Study on Social Change and the Role that Lawyers and Legal Clinics Ought to Play","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal College of Anaesthetists","keywords":"Grassroots; Law reform; Political science; Legal education; Law; Legal profession; Scholarship; Injustice; Empirical legal studies; Sociology; Social movement; Politics","score_opus":0.14543805735670856,"score_gpt":0.44527065231704566,"score_spread":0.2998325949603371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W5293378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7845096,0.0019319665,0.003305298,0.13471715,0.0009013168,0.00047512757,0.00004492899,0.00006351279,0.07405113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9695458,0.000964679,0.0013692207,0.014377618,0.0002278718,0.00024872422,0.00001789232,0.000057388643,0.01319075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96430147,0.026118293,0.00037350194,0.0011663173,0.0019210837,0.0061193616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764662,0.013835102,0.001342635,0.00060446816,0.001166763,0.006584938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014994204,0.0008095464,0.0009215127,0.0024745974,0.072140604,0.014039363,0.0042986614,0.014638577,0.0060527376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020729808,0.0010469176,0.0010019963,0.0026626075,0.03726959,0.010288437,0.017185228,0.017801763,0.0006190809],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026134,0.0005709731,0.0028015384,0.00008128052,0.00000800266,0.010298262,0.92312557,0.00011008208,0.0002609546,0.043955155,0.008967825,0.009794252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001561514,0.000075542615,0.0008453005,0.000099664634,0.0000055524356,0.0011830678,0.96001256,0.0001351417,0.00011026936,0.0024592832,0.035041645,0.000016387483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035555962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10357251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.072140604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016861213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015433323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12233722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W55165375","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1041","title":"Standard of Review from Decisions of the Ontario Rental Housing Tribunal","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Property Rights and Legal Doctrine","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Rental housing; Renting; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.07541170921499277,"score_gpt":0.3390322300614727,"score_spread":0.2636205208464799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W55165375","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047394875,0.53217083,0.0055468353,0.11922754,0.054251138,0.016930921,0.05337019,0.0010329675,0.21273008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.052215964,0.55798084,0.017304813,0.07316703,0.013301163,0.031386256,0.055564113,0.0009708308,0.19810897],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9257148,0.009642268,0.019144516,0.0032093157,0.03920318,0.0030859672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70777065,0.029206732,0.030689562,0.012848112,0.21387725,0.0056077912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040954236,0.0013339206,0.0044047046,0.021877635,0.0036878441,0.012428044,0.005942596,0.011111928,0.012897123],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15725878,0.0018195638,0.0029038065,0.022329262,0.0024792042,0.00343989,0.003270255,0.0034592636,0.008929545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002770963,0.000047999627,0.0015514682,0.06303343,0.0002967071,0.00046121125,0.0007182385,0.00023830698,0.0012849692,0.005863475,0.8084508,0.117776245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083651685,0.000031303873,0.008577433,0.025640575,0.0002445627,0.00008940124,0.000099917175,0.00006903341,0.00037544416,0.00058308465,0.96416396,0.00004177591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14781925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29584727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8521807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037019398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09802266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29391772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W570880264","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1063","title":"Judging Poverty: Using International Human Rights Law to Refine the Scope of Charter Rights","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Human Rights and Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Human rights; Scope (computer science); Political science; International human rights law; Poverty; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03899741146625104,"score_gpt":0.360057755886087,"score_spread":0.321060344419836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W570880264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0757695,0.0017691113,0.27021962,0.058662556,0.00078542595,0.00039408103,0.00026044482,0.00029021295,0.591849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906456,0.0006827666,0.101230666,0.0023125613,0.0002899368,0.0003081664,0.00012709817,0.00013049868,0.004272781],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700871,0.018852845,0.0016707729,0.0017302379,0.005800979,0.0018579985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9041451,0.0705722,0.004492079,0.0073382845,0.0120853735,0.0013670122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04733219,0.00075737445,0.0011709828,0.010013415,0.006090844,0.019320868,0.0025429851,0.0051560486,0.006380232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16468021,0.0005823694,0.0011730621,0.0053557516,0.040938552,0.023575407,0.008410746,0.010306359,0.0005297271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013953533,0.000023675784,0.0013345715,0.000038346592,0.000006472019,0.000053910273,0.0035087029,0.0010125248,0.000104244304,0.9731942,0.002750629,0.017958654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012039391,0.000019446376,0.0017121366,0.0002640527,0.000016449572,0.000031195865,0.0040467046,0.004377724,0.0004045811,0.97616553,0.012920379,0.000029871524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014998276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020867305,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04733219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006507583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010074406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25031948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W582896464","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1002","title":"\"Deference\" versus \"Security of Tenure\": Eviction of Residents of Subsidized Housing Co-Operatives at the Superior Court of Justice for Ontario, 1992-2009","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Eviction; Jurisdiction; Deference; Subsidy; Economic Justice; Subsidized housing; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Fair Housing Act; Business; Law; Public administration; Political science","score_opus":0.05483541657108347,"score_gpt":0.38527519214519135,"score_spread":0.33043977557410786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W582896464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9362293,0.0009312011,0.00019807235,0.0146297105,0.00006654616,0.000044253105,0.0003326417,0.0000067551164,0.047561582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98344225,0.00024251264,0.000077031225,0.0019350669,0.00002357903,0.000014403156,0.000059358797,0.000002717212,0.014203137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956274,0.000394419,0.0001433155,0.00028182828,0.0013755453,0.002177439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945682,0.0019903106,0.00069899135,0.00021312259,0.001580819,0.00094849145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029729416,0.00013367903,0.00029083024,0.0006904914,0.014776492,0.0022540928,0.0015503222,0.0036532555,0.0021037695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01207301,0.0003028394,0.00029472803,0.000985626,0.0059928857,0.0010317783,0.0025244888,0.0035803162,0.00012164009],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004589278,0.0002058258,0.45893225,0.00020778878,0.00012816416,0.008617759,0.1981452,0.0008522143,0.002608399,0.21820691,0.06885057,0.042786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009692205,0.00020547025,0.7605578,0.00031273693,0.00020268484,0.0014267326,0.09936398,0.00096384704,0.0017727555,0.007986993,0.12698343,0.00012662627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9659625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99370205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05467302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05467302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04858107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39668238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W583895045","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1043","title":"The Meaning of Compensation in Institutional Abuse Programs","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Corruption and Economic Development","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Compensation (psychology); Psychology; Social psychology; Business; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.06964690808809366,"score_gpt":0.3217192238368244,"score_spread":0.25207231574873074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W583895045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12502113,0.007223818,0.010873029,0.18698932,0.0011887226,0.00012105778,0.00011972228,0.000033377517,0.6684299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9864911,0.0008087396,0.00044864597,0.0034675552,0.00030946123,0.000076463824,0.000016125136,0.000011808659,0.008370208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98570466,0.009412303,0.000395724,0.0005554498,0.0012676223,0.002664184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98494,0.008208524,0.0018632045,0.00097305886,0.0014740202,0.0025411332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009629663,0.00032953953,0.00042581194,0.002766072,0.00815493,0.01061978,0.0020324092,0.0064679952,0.010682927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030691037,0.00033964857,0.00041719124,0.0022938543,0.024481561,0.008236393,0.007334361,0.00534057,0.0003097051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027126334,0.000045235418,0.0018213644,0.000021424466,0.0000050085255,0.00007169788,0.0045043854,0.0002666716,0.000013796208,0.9846031,0.0020170128,0.006603145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009325636,0.00009762824,0.010215714,0.00082808186,0.000032344065,0.0002479358,0.031839035,0.0024741227,0.00015012747,0.8705625,0.0834035,0.00005576372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011368212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011597603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014332139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014332139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012425816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.103987455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W597991928","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1015","title":"New \"Flexible\" Employment Standards Regulation in British Columbia","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Business; Labour economics; Economics","score_opus":0.018201731007849144,"score_gpt":0.34907004354517834,"score_spread":0.3308683125373292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W597991928","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8495221,0.00128066,0.0010820492,0.021755965,0.00022618256,0.00018884243,0.00064477796,0.000086580156,0.12521274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8728134,0.00059878547,0.0007969676,0.00389454,0.000025194884,0.00008602556,0.00027921126,0.000029907884,0.12147595],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948698,0.00055229047,0.0002799072,0.00053401815,0.0016437838,0.0021201903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930038,0.0013481113,0.00047297167,0.00049137016,0.0033582773,0.0013254444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002769755,0.0001488328,0.00026635267,0.0011060296,0.00947921,0.005493686,0.0018265593,0.0022937637,0.0048472174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008976194,0.0005490601,0.00017524458,0.0022582202,0.0032671434,0.0009222812,0.0023041242,0.0031279605,0.00032069764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060101994,0.00041089242,0.17196774,0.0005564742,0.000092110524,0.0029644552,0.079207584,0.008174412,0.014483339,0.30521217,0.09815725,0.31817254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009846471,0.00014148229,0.5286042,0.00043586685,0.000057161345,0.00019938705,0.047915094,0.0040150164,0.0019315879,0.006817636,0.40954387,0.00024019509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98914623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99651283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.081794284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.081794284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12196755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5934619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W598423153","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1058","title":"Organizing for Accountability: Community Legal Clinics and Police Complaints","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Accountability; Criminology; Political science; Business; Public relations; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.14567985611728657,"score_gpt":0.467528066604416,"score_spread":0.3218482104871294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W598423153","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77453357,0.002089437,0.0011799687,0.082654804,0.0006231441,0.00013693346,0.00015702719,0.000053915846,0.13857125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491185,0.00033212843,0.00011411136,0.001112186,0.00019113901,0.000036879304,0.000016939963,0.000009990223,0.003274792],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767835,0.013705319,0.000629883,0.00061192265,0.0031600236,0.005109459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9115487,0.040565457,0.026385946,0.002011519,0.00536202,0.014126435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008576378,0.00027133513,0.00036030295,0.003765734,0.0103811985,0.007769438,0.0014909493,0.0032019888,0.018543543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06825551,0.00035732184,0.00035931403,0.0029019627,0.010166361,0.004550814,0.006860879,0.0029501729,0.00044646725],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026096444,0.0014324882,0.457003,0.0004481562,0.00006929309,0.0024100856,0.22505738,0.00055616506,0.00021554674,0.16539057,0.038305752,0.1088505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009773162,0.0002287075,0.3495301,0.00091806205,0.00004865193,0.0010614265,0.53094083,0.0010440904,0.00025192954,0.026256315,0.08951553,0.000106609295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03435582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06112698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03435582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008515904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015373386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06831169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W609023248","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1206","title":"A Road to Home: The Right to Housing In Canada and Around the World","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Issues in South Africa","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wellesley Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Right to the city; Political science; Public administration; Law; Economic growth; Politics; Economics","score_opus":0.030145471920515615,"score_gpt":0.3342277108108299,"score_spread":0.30408223889031427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W609023248","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08344721,0.027140062,0.0008208628,0.5887298,0.0025402557,0.00009139257,0.0006055437,0.00003581026,0.29658905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78536445,0.02810902,0.0012627312,0.071735755,0.00040705595,0.00006071024,0.00028937077,0.00007792584,0.11269301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441296,0.00051103113,0.00009288307,0.00029169745,0.001545377,0.0031460274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961358,0.0004602253,0.00014518476,0.000083005514,0.0012960433,0.0018796775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021098554,0.0004950039,0.0004856761,0.0013788195,0.054532394,0.01379375,0.0018890891,0.006213741,0.0074362205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052246936,0.0003201722,0.0003913907,0.0026538635,0.016924232,0.0043881787,0.005521716,0.008222087,0.00042040844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006923385,0.00009507724,0.01464866,0.00023493251,0.00003583415,0.0014854466,0.10158955,0.0005705804,0.00048211322,0.44825777,0.37272638,0.0598045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011471248,0.00001537179,0.020636812,0.00062192586,0.000027555465,0.00021021781,0.1477622,0.00022463438,0.00026688387,0.0158921,0.8141658,0.0001650382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99870896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11209446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11209446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28840753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81330603},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W631262145","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1034","title":"When Old Meets New: Civil Remedies in the Criminal Context - A New Proposal for Compensating Victims of Crime","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"European Criminal Justice and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Criminology; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.07843927175799158,"score_gpt":0.3585832718192156,"score_spread":0.28014400006122403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W631262145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07756149,0.00820126,0.03793606,0.4231326,0.0034988688,0.00040219634,0.00016038738,0.00024354155,0.44886354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9043596,0.00217121,0.0109726945,0.021398278,0.0010377727,0.0001983253,0.00004066762,0.000052516603,0.059768952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986602,0.0042198068,0.00046560323,0.0012168786,0.003880732,0.0036149416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994521,0.0016580186,0.00044416916,0.00090545375,0.0013246577,0.0011467915],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008637785,0.0004972291,0.0006619125,0.002515052,0.010313692,0.012558969,0.003976128,0.009695469,0.0066556395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020191096,0.00043330775,0.00080787647,0.0012468332,0.034438647,0.008616411,0.008223368,0.007973012,0.00044898063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014053677,0.000029620893,0.0009822395,0.00003106245,0.0000065504173,0.00016193085,0.002641361,0.00029761664,0.00011115015,0.97564894,0.0060746605,0.014000809],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012226682,0.00015493136,0.008102783,0.00050536497,0.00010598199,0.00076523353,0.015047432,0.0034063552,0.00072351395,0.59389997,0.37702978,0.00013646252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18885101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43525225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18885101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019851547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059044473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37550354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W63491074","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1013","title":"Family Arbitration: One Step Forward, Two Steps Back","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Two step; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Applied mathematics","score_opus":0.03947905874857221,"score_gpt":0.35346821104787823,"score_spread":0.313989152299306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W63491074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08952441,0.018484902,0.03262624,0.26214448,0.0016198031,0.0002515334,0.00019854144,0.00015296962,0.5949971],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8296007,0.0042531746,0.007727066,0.008018779,0.00023751424,0.00008116033,0.000041862506,0.000054780663,0.14998496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915105,0.0026428942,0.0002542673,0.0010148322,0.0029018587,0.0016757047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99643767,0.000776999,0.00039859474,0.00047827858,0.0011337195,0.0007747222],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006011816,0.00034379802,0.00048235705,0.0008769367,0.011664577,0.007678127,0.001566134,0.003586251,0.011761326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010257825,0.00039674272,0.00050833455,0.0011277061,0.015683718,0.005314423,0.005867188,0.0036779286,0.0009988877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036040034,0.000017298631,0.0029760052,0.000101477024,0.0000147598985,0.0003272652,0.018355628,0.00032400663,0.00026775055,0.92324907,0.014582851,0.03974778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004705416,0.000056250334,0.009639601,0.0006308958,0.000038588347,0.00037899893,0.016824704,0.0012789362,0.0008621209,0.14508824,0.82508016,0.00007450394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.631138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72968453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.631138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042340223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06521227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7420685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64864323","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1019","title":"Religious Tribunals and the Ontario Arbitration Act, 1991: The Catalyst for Change","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Political science; Business; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.041402898975508244,"score_gpt":0.34143323659385677,"score_spread":0.3000303376183485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64864323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16478185,0.0104674455,0.0008485385,0.5607276,0.0014431896,0.00019346038,0.002293042,0.00005856211,0.25918636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74211985,0.005219319,0.0014891309,0.0652394,0.00070863584,0.00018480759,0.0005010524,0.00008264657,0.18445514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928324,0.0010431663,0.00027326008,0.0005154994,0.0030625602,0.0022731218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9882576,0.0038889202,0.0012144331,0.0003938835,0.0031947782,0.003050462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068292604,0.00025744888,0.00038532016,0.0015735202,0.01880729,0.011738895,0.0024133723,0.012756472,0.010558187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027083984,0.0008309389,0.000564172,0.0027563968,0.014561414,0.0038024345,0.0041674413,0.0074995207,0.00085332047],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016700539,0.00011061397,0.022988014,0.00024836,0.000048923277,0.0003289594,0.026196355,0.0006437928,0.0004914074,0.6839869,0.23810911,0.026680622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012838261,0.000022182896,0.097431265,0.00029140574,0.000052035313,0.000068399386,0.012410726,0.00047418906,0.00033469917,0.023829741,0.8648664,0.00009056013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9950246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1572202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1572202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25367692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W648694678","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1194","title":"The Role of Technology in the Provision of Poverty Law Services","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal service; Work (physics); Poverty; Legal research; Public relations; Legal profession; Realization (probability); Political science; Engineering ethics; Business; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.013646776839421062,"score_gpt":0.3646321301634562,"score_spread":0.35098535332403513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W648694678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60207105,0.006450869,0.008688926,0.039007213,0.00015622698,0.00023709366,0.00015917145,0.000099894714,0.34312946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917579,0.0015492322,0.0016949621,0.0010393498,0.00003522979,0.000056568286,0.0000139552685,0.000011906625,0.0038408865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986821,0.007855641,0.00039016997,0.0004199187,0.0021801204,0.002333231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97003996,0.021082435,0.0036025972,0.0009778223,0.0022996431,0.00199753],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006033628,0.0001900973,0.00018208774,0.0036324004,0.010142411,0.008696404,0.0013210413,0.0020677377,0.007714445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0210739,0.00034488575,0.00040270688,0.0032963476,0.011192877,0.0071828915,0.0076998905,0.002206093,0.000568645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112512564,0.00059925806,0.07286151,0.0007774963,0.000058400987,0.0030023633,0.11488169,0.0024533053,0.002051322,0.5619075,0.009983398,0.23131128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006315212,0.0010485479,0.14818572,0.0039880397,0.00014693798,0.0039111427,0.23671399,0.0053557316,0.0034815313,0.08864853,0.5082063,0.00025048087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023118878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0338002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023118878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009497552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014683365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06890988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W653491163","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1023","title":"Book Review: The Heirness vs the Establishment: Mrs. Campbell's Campaign for Legal Justice, by Constance Backhouse and Nancy L. Backhouse","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology; Criminology","score_opus":0.01376282955315064,"score_gpt":0.31582544102968446,"score_spread":0.3020626114765338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W653491163","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008327695,0.67032325,0.000060459042,0.26579022,0.05573151,0.000017819242,0.00013354827,0.000024143877,0.007835852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031151886,0.60582787,0.0002472382,0.24781074,0.07088916,0.00007893206,0.0002169143,0.00008161522,0.07173237],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970565,0.0006787895,0.00020156962,0.00021029041,0.0016672711,0.00018564258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.981642,0.007986768,0.0011300972,0.00026909698,0.0077444855,0.0012276054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035752829,0.00097630295,0.0017075829,0.003791861,0.0022010207,0.00654334,0.002670795,0.009051611,0.015050098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025081538,0.0007057516,0.00064501236,0.005203066,0.0027841667,0.0037650398,0.0012237371,0.009400393,0.008572227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035508976,0.0000010853862,0.000008279424,0.00010867659,0.000002101351,0.000005909678,0.000010952263,0.0000043534733,0.000006586456,0.00039269042,0.99532205,0.004133812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010868476,0.0000066651082,0.00024133715,0.0013476395,0.000012452642,0.000064927764,0.0000763461,0.00001294222,0.000027694532,0.0007070357,0.99748224,0.0000098118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06204503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18050604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06204503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007590703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017163496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12336779},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W653657508","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1005","title":"\"But Only on a Question of Law\": Examining the Scope of Appellate Review of the Landlord and Tenant Board","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"International Arbitration and Investment Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Landlord; Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Sociology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.026911403691348684,"score_gpt":0.28708022031202696,"score_spread":0.26016881662067826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W653657508","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1497872,0.01765493,0.0070203925,0.45698258,0.0008008526,0.00022608071,0.00013711535,0.000046965004,0.36734396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9175001,0.0018077692,0.0014354385,0.06697817,0.0010750486,0.00033149138,0.000033591663,0.0000432041,0.010795172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9237965,0.047453288,0.0025232497,0.00518955,0.011990214,0.0090471115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.68054575,0.24762815,0.01901735,0.006214103,0.035460893,0.011133781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07280872,0.00025993676,0.001120571,0.0054943846,0.01849597,0.022447195,0.0031294478,0.01971686,0.003568574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25217766,0.00082161877,0.000941129,0.0040014996,0.037362345,0.019447511,0.008048142,0.010888062,0.00043031786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007335769,0.000079586265,0.012298394,0.00016404325,0.00004528833,0.000275598,0.037277658,0.00024015033,0.0003465253,0.909504,0.02490112,0.014794332],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013896229,0.00026977417,0.08142843,0.0033407584,0.00017939447,0.00038829405,0.0802099,0.0012455615,0.0010793657,0.5010025,0.3304831,0.00023403921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05651961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09735241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9434804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016246505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046819564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38505393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W66244103","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1196","title":"Multi-disciplinary Practice in a Community Law Environment: Clinical Legal Education Combined with Holistic Service Provision","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discipline; Leasehold estate; Service (business); Bankruptcy; Legal education; Service-learning; Practice of law; Neighbourhood (mathematics); Legal research; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Law; Sociology; Political science; Legal profession; Engineering; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.09218450673027834,"score_gpt":0.473167992219119,"score_spread":0.38098348548884065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W66244103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7651685,0.0068715676,0.017920662,0.051976744,0.0012573916,0.0018947257,0.000037856946,0.0004299301,0.15444264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94012135,0.0043054163,0.03888503,0.004489413,0.00037270258,0.00070543797,0.000049994545,0.000053903837,0.011016689],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967451,0.0019346181,0.00006522266,0.00023747818,0.0003715278,0.0006460278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929784,0.00065996044,0.00022470282,0.00022038126,0.0002197024,0.0056969025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036691553,0.0003483616,0.00036401805,0.0010142323,0.0042160423,0.0031169488,0.0016425898,0.0020341673,0.008708214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005430743,0.00039916646,0.00031473997,0.0008709166,0.0030211492,0.002165007,0.01164545,0.002945349,0.0013479982],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017586793,0.0139025245,0.016929146,0.0011425946,0.000036087044,0.0047689453,0.065173686,0.0010883558,0.0026128674,0.011901921,0.039536357,0.84273165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019493466,0.013178855,0.17946844,0.007965722,0.000117075186,0.038241245,0.290597,0.0056083207,0.0037254137,0.06512295,0.39363587,0.00038974872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022436194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01645201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008708214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020079643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017136322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02913189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6937113590","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1487","title":"Front Matter","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"","field":"","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Front (military); Front and back ends","score_opus":0.014619243354985944,"score_gpt":0.3305413281220649,"score_spread":0.31592208476707895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6937113590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010046682,0.00043253656,0.00014695978,0.0025722706,0.0015530525,0.000031117335,0.0005987728,0.00020305048,0.9934576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026047942,0.00032526886,0.000087850036,0.0011367111,0.00031623946,0.000011220186,0.00017133208,0.000057457622,0.9952892],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995814,0.000033586544,0.000016421998,0.00012489595,0.0001292475,0.000114426715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991665,0.00018442408,0.00005568415,0.00005329278,0.00018249566,0.00035761975],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004816187,0.0014345229,0.00094691594,0.0018643456,0.0026300661,0.006510802,0.0009542702,0.0057486873,0.92064095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017112545,0.0005019148,0.00052771403,0.0013278959,0.0015956949,0.0027327817,0.002228854,0.0017056218,0.87299764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000807372,0.00022326554,0.0013906031,0.00024705016,0.000017492544,0.0004175117,0.0002122815,0.00009743754,0.0010770172,0.022056364,0.7833279,0.19085239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002257133,0.000031824333,0.0017088789,0.00025516696,0.0000073833316,0.00020504494,0.0003634895,0.00008077848,0.00017432534,0.0024065606,0.9947359,0.000008105825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031260697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00710916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079359055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008986181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015635005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113195956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W780636785","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1042","title":"An Analysis of the Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2001","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.1219575368469726,"score_gpt":0.38046370754355424,"score_spread":0.25850617069658166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W780636785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54649574,0.0048738266,0.00065742,0.03596314,0.00052609603,0.0010257466,0.2284988,0.0000756109,0.18188359],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7658196,0.006355352,0.0010719973,0.00648052,0.00010487325,0.0018400451,0.09049242,0.000069164715,0.12776598],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960931,0.00024787182,0.0002963801,0.0001606479,0.0025240285,0.0006779364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98340005,0.0017406892,0.0026187822,0.00036073817,0.010250752,0.0016290048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025618246,0.00023108503,0.0002723259,0.0026904522,0.002407805,0.00172518,0.0013540494,0.0009000019,0.0062079197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019015448,0.00043312358,0.0003859797,0.008763144,0.0005182906,0.00097550894,0.00081634714,0.001256995,0.0010524617],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002533889,0.00018870046,0.6175358,0.000675209,0.00009113713,0.00041743094,0.014858434,0.0005356626,0.00018079586,0.011210605,0.31278443,0.041268364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012058048,0.000026033737,0.92866504,0.00026541398,0.000017129592,0.000040759303,0.0066326926,0.00016214284,0.00005992624,0.000090735826,0.06401314,0.000014889007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9570991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9781569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04290092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029874515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055160433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2167558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W825083229","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1030","title":"Human Dignity and Ecnomic Integrity for Persons with Disabilities: A Commentary on the Supreme Court's Decisions in Granovsky and Martin","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Legal Systems and Judicial Processes","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Supreme court; Law; Sociology; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.056901249944821375,"score_gpt":0.35657258113704027,"score_spread":0.2996713311922189,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W825083229","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018163617,0.0069939387,0.00038071958,0.9766152,0.007757419,0.000017537182,0.000085892054,0.000013890873,0.0063190632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035824362,0.0029986687,0.00064366526,0.94580114,0.008596969,0.00007663487,0.00003010814,0.000042118336,0.005986258],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821845,0.006585078,0.0017691267,0.0025927937,0.0034287209,0.0034397647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92674994,0.06443897,0.0011687573,0.00093832746,0.0043187807,0.0023851995],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024802085,0.00087715435,0.003284556,0.0015089486,0.020562693,0.01446381,0.009387156,0.14641204,0.0047797477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066631034,0.0017669323,0.0033704098,0.002218087,0.024588134,0.009038186,0.008457315,0.11115527,0.0011684985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012590154,0.00004245821,0.00040667685,0.0002359972,0.00007179136,0.00087327586,0.0073866155,0.0003027595,0.0002486101,0.3286502,0.6537477,0.007907955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003462573,0.00009731268,0.0019135053,0.00421084,0.00034470944,0.0005651614,0.01257618,0.00064224115,0.001003366,0.24640666,0.731523,0.00037087634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119238436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20997992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88076156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014902611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03058723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2370888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W869676181","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1065","title":"\"Simple Logic\": Race, the Identity Documents Rule and the Story of a Nation Besieged and Betrayed","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"American Constitutional Law and Politics","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Simple (philosophy); Race (biology); Identity (music); Political science; Gender studies; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy; Epistemology; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.02024586816195284,"score_gpt":0.33914438706473893,"score_spread":0.3188985189027861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W869676181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036425967,0.0079008965,0.0062247925,0.4506449,0.0021052607,0.00002769499,0.00011854539,0.000045235392,0.49650678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534,0.0020635012,0.0011403471,0.05399518,0.0012591766,0.00007417706,0.000050261213,0.000071040056,0.08794633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686027,0.0020513237,0.00003663681,0.00028783438,0.00036656787,0.0003973393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832803,0.00096246006,0.00015804256,0.000111528716,0.0001878245,0.0002520924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037636647,0.0003935105,0.00028423895,0.0008164486,0.020133238,0.012186501,0.0012362871,0.005340573,0.005060913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007150991,0.00023301873,0.00025761386,0.0008843236,0.049300432,0.012141461,0.004121625,0.0074014026,0.0005834461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011409815,0.0000042843317,0.00011849546,0.000009663513,0.0000013449222,0.0000852639,0.017798988,0.000027769182,0.000021390058,0.95470935,0.025594758,0.001617287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020353556,0.000015756594,0.0005648156,0.0001829165,0.000007711317,0.00016523522,0.037390433,0.00029810946,0.00013740899,0.5825104,0.37868848,0.000018287317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05135232,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05767579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05135232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010112215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006552813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10210681},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W942236077","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1211","title":"Do Us Proud: Poor Women Claiming Adjudicative Space at CESR","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Human rights; Poverty; Political science; Participatory action research; Citizen journalism; Gender studies; Sociology; Public administration; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.09412649945809393,"score_gpt":0.45390141530058664,"score_spread":0.3597749158424927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W942236077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83509535,0.0014791945,0.0011925179,0.12081055,0.0004236177,0.00016551088,0.00012584716,0.000035435063,0.040671993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97887987,0.0010044569,0.00039841986,0.008898133,0.00005296001,0.00007337345,0.000019284274,0.000021854969,0.010651608],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865143,0.008027082,0.00020027776,0.0004328938,0.0013893774,0.0034361621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9865202,0.008084358,0.001323837,0.0005465189,0.0014443228,0.0020808596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120148705,0.00048054243,0.0005784511,0.001571787,0.054950338,0.010065435,0.0019913912,0.0060678488,0.0034892426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02618755,0.0006533677,0.000288122,0.0020371897,0.029006217,0.005144924,0.0125522055,0.010145523,0.0003909121],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014264293,0.000015747117,0.0017007513,0.000027475957,0.0000023726257,0.0007874892,0.98562753,0.000015926511,0.00022395869,0.004641028,0.0034311851,0.0035122116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017882937,0.000008952425,0.0005719275,0.000047569356,0.0000027804874,0.000101262405,0.984775,0.000022126718,0.00013472809,0.0005821037,0.013744743,0.0000069607017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32102022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50743824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32102022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021024035,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028607925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63830334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W9525550","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1059","title":"The Ontario Tenant Protection Act: A Trust Betrayed","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.055566843752669084,"score_gpt":0.3433718898515991,"score_spread":0.28780504609893004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W9525550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23715596,0.0054939906,0.0032966237,0.2655418,0.000552949,0.00009908667,0.0004554259,0.00008806532,0.48731613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90276694,0.0015497591,0.000405556,0.010235451,0.00009264289,0.00003399679,0.000061079125,0.0000332593,0.084821366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99088144,0.0013207316,0.0002908063,0.00044904248,0.00427222,0.0027857323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98611414,0.004696232,0.0018068432,0.0009417061,0.0039605573,0.002480605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046368716,0.0001760478,0.0002916007,0.0009142856,0.014746741,0.005999707,0.0012274389,0.0041694324,0.006340087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020124322,0.00039524594,0.0003403205,0.002121306,0.010646051,0.0028867715,0.004103675,0.0031885356,0.0005252716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015927629,0.0000328958,0.042612355,0.00022703926,0.00004378678,0.0018496189,0.105605006,0.0004977562,0.0009561527,0.6717173,0.1268914,0.04940731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003710118,0.00006250888,0.059234142,0.00040925635,0.0000732562,0.00045860463,0.038804285,0.00072212995,0.00051745656,0.026211202,0.873368,0.00010203793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9520552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9790916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07274715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07274715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10484545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}