{"meta":{"query_hash":"ca5d4f05b78e","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Law and Society"},"cohort_total":46,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":46,"exported":46,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ca5d4f05b78e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Law+and+Society"},"results":[{"id":"W1543664716","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2015.00717.x","title":"Implementation in International Business Self‐regulation: The Importance of Sequences and their Linkages","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"International Business and FDI","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Industrial organization","score_opus":0.023245800360256058,"score_gpt":0.27628044823066983,"score_spread":0.25303464787041374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543664716","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27018017,0.0019917851,0.42366225,0.014396005,0.00020516515,0.0006642371,0.00016212759,0.00039095024,0.2883475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.950442,0.0004888717,0.043899614,0.00035943472,0.000043070486,0.0005555254,0.0000804282,0.00006701813,0.004063968],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9775277,0.014636753,0.0014691782,0.0020587519,0.003267482,0.0010400498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9449359,0.03311916,0.008628652,0.0069553237,0.004589275,0.0017717251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018154072,0.00040888885,0.000563613,0.004255363,0.0031704486,0.008770321,0.0015413206,0.0028156196,0.0057876664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042790875,0.0007698356,0.0007716722,0.0031199697,0.023303306,0.01848953,0.005440325,0.0029605115,0.000567637],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002492805,0.00005512999,0.0034103894,0.000050243267,0.000008702101,0.00004637123,0.0049215313,0.0017987514,0.00015029666,0.9734342,0.00020181834,0.015897581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026427555,0.00006460981,0.0034687815,0.00019458648,0.000014442062,0.00008020901,0.0036188164,0.007172569,0.00041612677,0.9722662,0.012648099,0.000029156467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035433806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021404885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018154072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006219783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070492285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.096009016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1639363320","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2015.00706.x","title":"Fishing for Precarious Status Migrants: Surveillant Assemblages of Migrant Illegalization in Toronto, Canada","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Migration, Health and Trauma","field":"Psychology","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Government (linguistics); Qualitative research; Political science; Migrant workers; Sociology; Qualitative property; Criminology; Economic growth; Demographic economics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.027078046809849564,"score_gpt":0.3236383594743891,"score_spread":0.2965603126645396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1639363320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9945879,0.0005627951,0.00010145118,0.0009742746,0.000012550262,0.00003799452,0.00018629465,0.0000064559363,0.0035302634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99700963,0.00066709274,0.00016124874,0.00016251575,0.0000039999286,0.000019331448,0.00010370383,0.000006063976,0.0018663298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873,0.00027611075,0.00006362362,0.00010798494,0.00024698584,0.00057527935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975666,0.0004626503,0.0005586157,0.000087175154,0.0006065408,0.0007185924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009029296,0.0003782856,0.00042296606,0.0023741291,0.016337201,0.0035668975,0.0017020871,0.00076912146,0.00335917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029882353,0.00043401527,0.00023803597,0.0038624771,0.0072799255,0.0013199704,0.004723899,0.0014618378,0.00015206405],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047991336,0.000022561102,0.11138288,0.000137715,0.00001788477,0.0016061385,0.87355363,0.00007345865,0.00060077483,0.0010447247,0.0023029053,0.009209325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011598866,0.000014246786,0.08177783,0.00009936025,0.0000062644417,0.00013206738,0.91321695,0.000053234042,0.00007129007,0.000052709773,0.004561151,0.0000136946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970131,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049272638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049272638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051430885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35749972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984285000","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00614.x","title":"Maine (and Weber) Against the Grain: Towards a Postcolonial Genealogy of the Corporate Person","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Political Economy and Marxism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.02827978332626826,"score_gpt":0.25779668716228776,"score_spread":0.2295169038360195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984285000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20634964,0.019111766,0.0070879124,0.09787804,0.00093029934,0.000028876222,0.000043202414,0.00009249507,0.6684778],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697048,0.0024918804,0.00071812095,0.0036584928,0.00018226179,0.000016632637,0.000009198379,0.000032155323,0.023186423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913377,0.0005152429,0.000016751712,0.000093215676,0.0001177897,0.00012321062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991155,0.00055194256,0.00008283431,0.00009832259,0.00008390782,0.000067605455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011873291,0.00017287658,0.00014123105,0.0011051286,0.004258597,0.007446469,0.00044044355,0.0011882694,0.0015580605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022215638,0.00012377593,0.000085964166,0.0009913207,0.033444453,0.0047104396,0.0023026252,0.0024808461,0.0002754558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070803544,0.000005855708,0.00031004433,0.000011049053,9.3156393e-7,0.00008615985,0.05809668,0.000030841307,0.00007079886,0.9318663,0.0030959183,0.0064182915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000964777,0.000028150145,0.0026148767,0.00025909804,0.0000071345826,0.00027814743,0.044654857,0.0003164638,0.0005238119,0.4069508,0.5443405,0.000016435013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014326125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013111106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014326125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048271534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021818224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03502363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985338100","doi":"10.1111/1467-6478.00238","title":"Woe Unto You, Judges: or How Reading Frankfurter and Greene, <i>The Labor Injunction,</i> Ruined Me as a Labour Lawyer and Made Me as an Academic","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03024942609389151,"score_gpt":0.3070784440875099,"score_spread":0.27682901799361836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985338100","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005136104,0.04299924,0.003125311,0.5844383,0.011514022,0.000017778859,0.000106795,0.00008955068,0.35257292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15951067,0.022319337,0.0024090714,0.1579633,0.0036484033,0.000039427257,0.00012680184,0.00033920698,0.65364385],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881065,0.0003886502,0.000031330565,0.00017992275,0.0003931066,0.00019635369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984394,0.00062272133,0.00014501541,0.000117632655,0.0004563215,0.00021902521],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011807336,0.00033753845,0.00035570405,0.0007723432,0.0058446215,0.009010443,0.0006241058,0.0034758502,0.019153276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011006966,0.00032300723,0.00020567316,0.0009168643,0.008340269,0.012695729,0.0016298154,0.0055880966,0.006075066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009903943,0.00000932724,0.00037380215,0.00004841528,0.000004880127,0.00007747291,0.0055560777,0.0000260115,0.00019680843,0.21919271,0.7435734,0.03093117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040738614,0.000008731279,0.0006591677,0.0003435168,0.0000052509795,0.00010578191,0.008127767,0.000039559643,0.00019791276,0.06475205,0.9257392,0.00001692391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02302877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085004166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02302877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028746882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033287671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06407404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986547022","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00631.x","title":"The Developing Habitus of the Anti‐Social Behaviour Practitioner: From Expansion in Years of Plenty to Surviving the Age of Austerity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Homelessness and Social Issues","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Newcastle University","keywords":"Austerity; Habitus; Politics; Government (linguistics); Coalition government; Public housing; Sociology; Public relations; General partnership; Political science; Economic growth; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.04951741949127462,"score_gpt":0.37762640480439946,"score_spread":0.3281089853131248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986547022","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.885616,0.002407202,0.001201115,0.06606872,0.00038974307,0.00005180315,0.00001985968,0.000034646237,0.04421092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98598295,0.0010814732,0.00035796996,0.0061493716,0.000065118096,0.00002494139,0.0000063375464,0.000022705886,0.0063091675],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99259686,0.0044099153,0.00022552164,0.00045188091,0.0011945954,0.001121123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98842096,0.0036206532,0.0020462545,0.0005200811,0.0011269485,0.004265216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006576269,0.00014615495,0.00027179936,0.0011407204,0.011428748,0.0060001165,0.0008939796,0.0015864922,0.0033254295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012391659,0.00045071627,0.00014626062,0.0009404666,0.019924933,0.0057342416,0.0086249,0.004776872,0.00053587835],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019307921,0.00008732338,0.02263641,0.00007935431,0.0000056628433,0.00092974264,0.9231716,0.000022113598,0.00072124007,0.020108819,0.0060340455,0.02618434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044698418,0.00010258669,0.017786149,0.00026004046,0.0000030918345,0.0009988154,0.92010504,0.00007051641,0.00011550676,0.003546145,0.056983605,0.00002396943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011822219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026746342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011822219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046713618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010636296,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03477907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012185585","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00630.x","title":"Weber Reading Stammler: What Horizons for the Sociology of Law?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Sociology; Epistemology; Reading (process); Sociology of law; Positive economics; Law; Philosophy; Social science; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.042024905207590814,"score_gpt":0.3283728822950201,"score_spread":0.28634797708742926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012185585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014113728,0.1568457,0.014654014,0.6946412,0.0057084872,0.00001932657,0.00008999616,0.000101345904,0.11382614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7196908,0.112918645,0.01199147,0.08771165,0.0112266885,0.0001372266,0.00008526868,0.00030139938,0.0559368],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831414,0.0011133631,0.00003890129,0.00017122886,0.00025153678,0.000110753856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99642974,0.002647696,0.00021363758,0.00018073317,0.0002640574,0.00026413397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041576987,0.0006821212,0.0007908243,0.0028902087,0.0037793505,0.0071903896,0.00087083736,0.004063845,0.0065463446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009852805,0.0003280703,0.00037642682,0.0021003655,0.021851823,0.027005754,0.0021591133,0.0048618517,0.001039983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013809159,0.000013554573,0.00009080141,0.00004327027,0.0000033182148,0.00003013107,0.0023538892,0.000074570635,0.000051312974,0.9672752,0.018267008,0.011783131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005242081,0.0000075834405,0.00010615246,0.00019370305,0.0000023543944,0.000020991894,0.0024305992,0.00011362168,0.00007137398,0.9233248,0.07371552,0.00000807763],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004354757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005058868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071903896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004661137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036765486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03381914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2055402064","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00555.x","title":"John R. Commons and Max Weber: The Foundations of an Economic Sociology of Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Montreal Council on Foreign Relations","funders":"","keywords":"Commons; Sociology; Sociology of law; GRASP; Law; State (computer science); Dimension (graph theory); Law and economics; Economics; Positive economics; Social science; Political science","score_opus":0.055526927750030944,"score_gpt":0.24521151348812917,"score_spread":0.1896845857380982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2055402064","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013012139,0.20273341,0.061021265,0.45008603,0.006025789,0.000087101536,0.00035845654,0.00015665841,0.26651913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71128297,0.15657516,0.032145597,0.027176058,0.014949442,0.00047285072,0.00017565461,0.0002578744,0.05696441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974281,0.0013044977,0.00011113177,0.00024553871,0.0007430334,0.00016759973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99206597,0.006163323,0.00045537206,0.00038938186,0.0005324405,0.0003935944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045036357,0.0006896861,0.0008319233,0.003380919,0.003374665,0.0061959047,0.0009735813,0.0041929637,0.003267168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012684391,0.0006034243,0.00062989217,0.0031626294,0.018904438,0.012305154,0.0023243995,0.004792535,0.00081445824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047523595,0.000006206887,0.000059439943,0.000024125819,0.0000027089516,0.00001933234,0.00027309172,0.00030852875,0.000017109578,0.98711944,0.008943618,0.003221659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032170153,0.0000022976635,0.0000810922,0.00009502263,0.0000014691898,0.000012848048,0.00010743626,0.00031807186,0.000019827785,0.96442765,0.034924656,0.0000064348806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050762184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037519208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0061959047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046954365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045009153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03406787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062851214","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2013.00638.x","title":"The Political Origins of English Private Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Legitimacy; Politics; Public law; Law; Political science; Rationality; Political law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Sociology; Law and economics; Black letter law","score_opus":0.017862832459416722,"score_gpt":0.3017493670954498,"score_spread":0.2838865346360331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062851214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11015704,0.004128796,0.022365926,0.051919024,0.00034877023,0.00004597004,0.00012472225,0.00004358603,0.8108661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661016,0.0009215637,0.001491429,0.0018038559,0.0002486563,0.000039091618,0.000031025098,0.00003507149,0.029327692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619895,0.0016114782,0.00013017649,0.0005222536,0.00087652577,0.00066057907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99505424,0.0030532863,0.0004328435,0.00043839408,0.0007331826,0.00028801523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037315323,0.00019423685,0.00037507067,0.0014728473,0.005934472,0.009172282,0.00063049304,0.0021172927,0.005702786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007701034,0.0003869038,0.00028281467,0.0010002257,0.020476209,0.0071926913,0.0037129545,0.0043207146,0.0006643609],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022642275,0.000002660224,0.00006591661,0.0000051756083,4.158105e-7,0.000032133277,0.0026817792,0.000022021679,0.000038361904,0.9958325,0.00040761015,0.0009092246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002030918,0.000016223314,0.0015623063,0.000106654,0.0000070810092,0.00012516294,0.0042594485,0.00084189494,0.00039222479,0.8221895,0.17046346,0.000015738879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010585436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008609201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010585436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0084424885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003106986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06125486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2084043396","doi":"10.1111/1467-6478.00160","title":"‘A New Beginning’ for Policing","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Centre for Comparative Criminology","funders":"","keywords":"Northern ireland; Commission; Political science; European commission; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Ethnology; Business; European union; International trade","score_opus":0.05272796584477599,"score_gpt":0.3934464345867549,"score_spread":0.34071846874197886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2084043396","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01743765,0.0072597777,0.026995555,0.5822869,0.0059546805,0.0003249541,0.00011221624,0.00018229039,0.359446],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7644943,0.00529002,0.051765945,0.1247797,0.0030716492,0.0009187395,0.00018744572,0.00023343955,0.049258765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9486018,0.026927076,0.002236183,0.0042245137,0.009453125,0.008557283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714335,0.0064861057,0.0027119135,0.0025097427,0.0065174494,0.010341357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029387953,0.0008988595,0.0012849902,0.0029752105,0.015951883,0.029749552,0.004689566,0.01731217,0.0065567996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023676727,0.0010343436,0.0012487617,0.0020372788,0.08857922,0.03307027,0.022671826,0.029570417,0.0017540541],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026889647,0.000040011273,0.00075292756,0.0002024111,0.000006130991,0.00023216929,0.029438203,0.00019011245,0.00013903926,0.92434204,0.03164749,0.012982545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023906456,0.00014401058,0.0024323792,0.00092261616,0.00000676331,0.0003204196,0.04004303,0.00027394423,0.00013401377,0.25484285,0.7007428,0.00011335387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024292193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0500966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030898442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030898442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052414622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22418493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2096708218","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2004.00305.x","title":"Getting Marx and Foucault into Bed Together!","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Social Sciences and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Psychoanalysis; Sociology; Philosophy; Art; Psychology","score_opus":0.01805856974650014,"score_gpt":0.3085097598684524,"score_spread":0.29045119012195225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2096708218","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035824038,0.11302628,0.011175012,0.4838878,0.019762699,0.000021895765,0.00006510359,0.0004163926,0.36806238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24552946,0.0594133,0.011776051,0.07830068,0.018146569,0.0001443284,0.000100655074,0.0013992477,0.5851897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730265,0.0014270188,0.000064651766,0.00021200419,0.0006217515,0.00037179323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99749255,0.0013227015,0.00017080737,0.00033791267,0.00039687063,0.0002791476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028507826,0.0009138981,0.00074159494,0.0016045001,0.0090187285,0.010271011,0.0009959058,0.0045070727,0.020727882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00922339,0.00047764802,0.0005124608,0.0014861383,0.022591565,0.018142482,0.0055052238,0.008385396,0.0072569284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037180893,0.000019407005,0.00014435472,0.000081333455,0.0000096967915,0.00009388281,0.00816022,0.000083581326,0.00009531797,0.6894682,0.25299627,0.048810583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065969557,0.000009882842,0.00011124414,0.00019127404,0.0000036442377,0.00009397395,0.003597938,0.000055971166,0.00011898013,0.3081972,0.6876003,0.000013065511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057011642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010074928,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020727882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062537817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036882542,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06934166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2111874404","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2009.00483.x","title":"Max Weber on the Labour Contract: Between Realism and Formal Legal Thought","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legal realism; Sociology of law; Sociology; Positivism; Legal positivism; Epistemology; Law; Empirical legal studies; Realism; Formalism (music); Law and economics; Legal profession; Political science; Social science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02868697941064112,"score_gpt":0.3111765602201394,"score_spread":0.28248958080949826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2111874404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029844977,0.20687132,0.043072022,0.22915903,0.003605817,0.000077300174,0.00016225518,0.000084438834,0.48712277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8219877,0.08108422,0.011741797,0.020755911,0.0074669393,0.00026759028,0.00008533065,0.00014692637,0.05646353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975458,0.0014823595,0.000059430666,0.00020381741,0.00055789045,0.0001506983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970065,0.002466919,0.00014110899,0.00013824871,0.00016099699,0.00008619027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038919102,0.00048721413,0.0004825265,0.002133595,0.002576854,0.0049097347,0.0006349007,0.0020476729,0.0019881148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007122241,0.0002704387,0.00033715446,0.0019918014,0.016565181,0.009174103,0.0019207543,0.0028911545,0.0004052447],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039620804,0.000002829336,0.000024310946,0.00001538441,9.247687e-7,0.000012660616,0.0007224722,0.00009084367,0.000022219334,0.9935364,0.0029381763,0.002629676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026279633,0.0000045598986,0.000061478844,0.00009500279,0.0000012447418,0.00001533406,0.00026415777,0.00016587753,0.000042053547,0.95736784,0.041976184,0.0000037057114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024204142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016351521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0049097347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043300423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025220995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031416774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130796309","doi":"10.1111/1467-6478.00247","title":"Evaluating the Scottish Public Defence Solicitors’ Office","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publicity; Conviction; Public defender; Law; Public office; Business; Political science; Criminal justice","score_opus":0.08222842579535214,"score_gpt":0.2791853581653373,"score_spread":0.19695693236998515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130796309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71882373,0.0022795114,0.001261568,0.06584823,0.001488387,0.0013040971,0.0014174645,0.00027258668,0.20730454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455278,0.00062220194,0.0010974695,0.013579833,0.00048317542,0.00036589606,0.00044730742,0.0000681732,0.037808105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95241714,0.011860235,0.0020323026,0.0012069643,0.02233385,0.010149527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.843329,0.061116107,0.01498603,0.006572617,0.049394697,0.024601545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04679848,0.0004574129,0.00046620658,0.0033153992,0.009521964,0.012212353,0.0024802834,0.005400972,0.017296966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10530819,0.0006759056,0.0007442481,0.0024029445,0.0040603075,0.0042184135,0.007933973,0.0033598198,0.0028455118],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.006754506,0.0023270824,0.25598234,0.0014938934,0.0003057004,0.011541772,0.045169514,0.0017156099,0.0067076148,0.061691165,0.35189983,0.25441095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009903824,0.0037972494,0.304732,0.00069063646,0.00024739187,0.0012973371,0.06362439,0.0017450256,0.004188205,0.002602257,0.6157039,0.0003812326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.117368616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25158796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117368616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022407461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025321195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24749696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2146659683","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2014.00682.x","title":"Socio‐legal Scholarship in Canada: A Review of the Field","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Scholarship; Field (mathematics); Political science; Sociology; Law; Regional science","score_opus":0.07271623548133417,"score_gpt":0.435153495430251,"score_spread":0.36243725994891685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2146659683","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012251675,0.99727577,0.000020375808,0.0012895955,0.00024715054,0.000004141014,0.000023215662,0.0000021335595,0.0010151572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017935771,0.9972785,0.00009042748,0.00038485025,0.00011351994,0.0000049817763,0.000021183161,0.0000020165758,0.0003109386],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977943,0.00023859396,0.0001944504,0.00017506522,0.0013416369,0.00025604453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896259,0.0030043244,0.00066786323,0.00015095645,0.0055097146,0.0010413775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041385307,0.0009062234,0.0017540541,0.019969303,0.00456187,0.0062716138,0.0016573983,0.0024856972,0.0047377157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009016811,0.0005635972,0.00059847225,0.044894315,0.004597155,0.0032980698,0.0028795404,0.0022678906,0.00071228616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062187464,0.000106908155,0.0019988555,0.041537836,0.000119355565,0.000344956,0.003123619,0.0004930052,0.00037469037,0.034139033,0.15679744,0.7609021],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007914283,0.000026659907,0.008999879,0.029156156,0.0000919185,0.00025768366,0.002014115,0.00007932353,0.00007577656,0.0023173667,0.9569305,0.000042774045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80579555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91738373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95626557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043734416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17529555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3906963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2148559620","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2006.00346.x","title":"Affirmative Action in Women's Employment: Lessons from Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Discrimination and Equality Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Affirmative action; Obligation; Equity (law); Politics; Political science; Representation (politics); Economic Justice; Reverse discrimination; Labour law; Government (linguistics); Criticism; Law; Sociology; Public administration; Law and economics","score_opus":0.04282597809895069,"score_gpt":0.34086240865568074,"score_spread":0.29803643055673007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2148559620","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19880424,0.026766624,0.0011071556,0.52064353,0.0015995668,0.0001626149,0.00039060737,0.000058177266,0.25046742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83250016,0.026184013,0.0019849997,0.06333809,0.00030218152,0.00009499844,0.00015695776,0.00008010641,0.07535851],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99189794,0.0013247937,0.0001787227,0.00042084974,0.002232808,0.003944976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896868,0.003032788,0.00025624313,0.00016049836,0.00365026,0.0032134051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068365578,0.0004586024,0.0008576159,0.0013097017,0.039176606,0.011254161,0.0032666714,0.00706773,0.007843026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010402609,0.00040115276,0.0006406021,0.0038174253,0.012693679,0.003448735,0.0053470917,0.006909058,0.0004857303],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003519748,0.00044337334,0.021295289,0.00088682736,0.000067622444,0.004489605,0.19586629,0.001991195,0.0009195324,0.38686195,0.18007696,0.20674935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001703148,0.00020593317,0.02258573,0.0015424264,0.000114238326,0.00055064185,0.22642566,0.0010339099,0.001064629,0.031029297,0.7150483,0.00022889965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9985246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.182323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.182323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37205288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9483894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2164773408","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2014.00680.x","title":"<i>EXPLORING THE ‘SOCIO’ OF SOCIO‐LEGAL STUDIES</i> ed. DERMOT FEENAN","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Sociology; Legal education; Legal writing; Critical legal studies; Legal research; Law; Media studies; Political science; Computer science; Legal realism","score_opus":0.08287004001954854,"score_gpt":0.32401053712399575,"score_spread":0.2411404971044472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2164773408","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010414313,0.1909063,0.0030125305,0.7653698,0.008654255,0.000017540673,0.00007238279,0.000039129,0.030886617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12262009,0.40690008,0.011317005,0.28608423,0.034163352,0.0002776065,0.00018936083,0.00047027273,0.13797803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655837,0.0021425223,0.00011846187,0.00024079742,0.0007539391,0.00018592057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9845471,0.012839915,0.00038084775,0.00028026276,0.0013304711,0.000621432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060776863,0.00073094066,0.0007082765,0.002914824,0.007380403,0.012172962,0.0014743247,0.0046757115,0.0051590404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01172529,0.00053593685,0.0004986647,0.0033311823,0.0148299495,0.021872645,0.0042346525,0.009714671,0.0015530873],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017524979,0.000015248955,0.000477907,0.00027315295,0.000007740037,0.00011355293,0.008412022,0.00015086046,0.00012444772,0.32161093,0.6409944,0.027802205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047953927,0.0000057747293,0.0006937763,0.0010236782,0.000004605509,0.00015113366,0.009991922,0.0002202825,0.00018275337,0.20000604,0.78768826,0.00002700725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02127668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059468973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02127668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055417414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067070588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04230565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165904716","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2010.00498.x","title":"Male Sex Work: Exploring Regulation in England and Wales","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Sex work and related issues","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":44,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Sex work; Masculinity; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Gender studies; Sociology; Female sex; Visibility; Political science; Geography; Medicine; Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)","score_opus":0.032112174642523784,"score_gpt":0.28466823825458104,"score_spread":0.25255606361205724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165904716","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.901438,0.0053503686,0.00095713115,0.019787917,0.000100499194,0.000049391798,0.00006897926,0.000011300628,0.07223645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98667043,0.0016972796,0.0001483981,0.0014679376,0.000020625555,0.00004432908,0.00001543815,0.0000074298255,0.009928075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961111,0.0020508876,0.00014468581,0.0002672767,0.00044958116,0.0009765495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954306,0.0028629818,0.00071176677,0.00013165684,0.00030855162,0.0005544922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027954439,0.00016002893,0.0003511357,0.0013357772,0.008944081,0.0067281146,0.0010058149,0.0023180689,0.004948176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004272677,0.00051863876,0.00021429805,0.0021374838,0.011881637,0.0037259506,0.0068695727,0.0022149486,0.00030011064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029683732,0.000018758952,0.006318016,0.00017843612,0.000003340232,0.0010146005,0.9219535,0.00007050663,0.000611857,0.06196404,0.0011143105,0.0067228223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053169865,0.00005266805,0.02554844,0.0003831958,0.0000048346797,0.00034214946,0.89586604,0.000119071694,0.00021834485,0.003926925,0.073508374,0.000024597692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19164214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31213772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19164214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020964827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009660235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38105333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268101846","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00745.x","title":"Is the Blush off the Rose? Legal Education Metaphors in a Changing World","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Dialogic; Legal education; Globalization; Resizing; Generative grammar; Legal realism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Legal profession; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Economics","score_opus":0.03473922675876476,"score_gpt":0.36703581993852225,"score_spread":0.33229659317975746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268101846","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09526718,0.016803233,0.028608104,0.38572767,0.0017507224,0.00007698581,0.000071514565,0.00017324666,0.47152135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97110015,0.0024567388,0.005395155,0.010646459,0.00024431478,0.000062828214,0.000020928532,0.000063308304,0.010010254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924501,0.0061916895,0.00008996787,0.0002603041,0.00059708895,0.00041089914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958961,0.0027469168,0.00033520354,0.00031384133,0.0003728722,0.0003350947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006131725,0.00058921054,0.00044095228,0.002277399,0.009928644,0.010690409,0.0011187232,0.0035046875,0.004764104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009744521,0.00024526633,0.00040071993,0.002060958,0.0576637,0.01809782,0.0055910675,0.0070998087,0.0005866762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001252206,0.000013492708,0.00017789197,0.000037469665,0.0000013968254,0.00012420568,0.059133492,0.000049091956,0.000086475586,0.9306819,0.0051462655,0.004535798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028790746,0.000037091013,0.0005534552,0.00038637195,0.000008856726,0.00042378966,0.19058928,0.00084399356,0.00026268055,0.5637128,0.24312152,0.000031409523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005084681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00641228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010690409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077362005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038818445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05613035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268768986","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00742.x","title":"M. NourbeSe Philip's <i>Zong!</i>: Metaphors, Laws, and Fugues of Justice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Acadia University","funders":"","keywords":"Metaphor; Poetics; Witness; Poetry; Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Colonialism; Commodification; Literature; Tian; Philosophy; History; Art; Theology; Political science","score_opus":0.021255043849036426,"score_gpt":0.2990137994125231,"score_spread":0.27775875556348667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268768986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11446121,0.05770131,0.00335492,0.42255673,0.0050479835,0.000056153593,0.00008326099,0.00015604291,0.3965824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87940675,0.010611088,0.0011105323,0.033699695,0.00080102193,0.000036826194,0.000013435981,0.000095624506,0.07422512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950576,0.0003212406,0.000008759925,0.000039625476,0.00005885672,0.00006567482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995503,0.00026033862,0.00007034773,0.000015737513,0.000038841554,0.00006444908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053392915,0.00023367643,0.00014970245,0.00035624788,0.004536205,0.0032209377,0.0003270379,0.002101333,0.0026614976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021602714,0.00015479702,0.00007874141,0.00030388,0.0069926614,0.002614776,0.0018713234,0.0022706403,0.00041219548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035447632,0.000012154288,0.0013995606,0.00017025496,0.0000042912116,0.00090926606,0.20784517,0.000070009504,0.00074435194,0.5372507,0.2279787,0.023580065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036942981,0.000017735658,0.0014602087,0.00023530587,0.0000024785604,0.00083699374,0.048653394,0.0000793008,0.00034504602,0.019154986,0.9291989,0.000012025522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01637334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028398756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01637334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018115107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012581097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032556057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2375012371","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2016.00752.x","title":"Socio‐legal Studies in France: Beyond the Law Faculty","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Systems and Institutions","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Law; Legal profession; Orthodoxy; Political science; Legal practice; Legal realism; Aotearoa; Sociology; TRACE (psycholinguistics); History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.037380528030758774,"score_gpt":0.29036425398422216,"score_spread":0.2529837259534634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2375012371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2879694,0.15942536,0.0021628097,0.2465538,0.0012849307,0.000030708004,0.0001530721,0.00011797211,0.30230197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588377,0.01720559,0.00061303563,0.0056637786,0.0014812844,0.000022755932,0.00004116066,0.000028044464,0.0161068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549353,0.0026707482,0.0000886571,0.00023820391,0.0007173645,0.00079149014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904191,0.005360144,0.0011468091,0.00039813214,0.0010163272,0.0016595683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005170485,0.00027690403,0.00044572863,0.0047319047,0.013194308,0.012218366,0.0009209193,0.003662123,0.008747286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065242513,0.0002339488,0.0003695537,0.00437803,0.014309792,0.0051775365,0.0040204558,0.0025246427,0.0005241967],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003446241,0.00010999612,0.01238584,0.00035974584,0.00002398611,0.0006688774,0.101855434,0.0005074633,0.00040799665,0.76751757,0.02240956,0.09371896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013745012,0.00008313703,0.061553746,0.0010453269,0.000009818883,0.00029080757,0.08130696,0.00042879986,0.0002599471,0.051100623,0.8038577,0.00004934324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17168857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23377146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17168857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032230366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018094689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34137845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2541674575","doi":"10.1111/jols.12002","title":"European Data Protection Regulation and Online New Media: Mind the Enforcement Gap","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Harmonization; Expansive; Data Protection Act 1998; Business; Law enforcement; Corporate governance; Action (physics); Social media; Public relations; Internet privacy; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Sociology; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.10631489473834367,"score_gpt":0.32440922489813395,"score_spread":0.2180943301597903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2541674575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20369193,0.015539346,0.10919554,0.19677606,0.0011475311,0.00038667675,0.0007946211,0.00053439074,0.4719339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9312805,0.0023564303,0.017181778,0.032979984,0.00036043325,0.00027043207,0.00031290654,0.00015991993,0.0150975445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.924653,0.037655205,0.0069106044,0.009888279,0.015494639,0.0053983615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8409743,0.10350028,0.011474272,0.026543476,0.013790205,0.0037175845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08979158,0.00041825947,0.00094478246,0.004000016,0.0061417697,0.022835469,0.0034612534,0.011095005,0.0057122926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.115482144,0.0007778665,0.0010833663,0.005540853,0.022163954,0.02266331,0.012592316,0.010611936,0.00075571705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038090857,0.000055212276,0.003119589,0.00014319514,0.000021252961,0.00027119784,0.009319351,0.0006364498,0.00043588228,0.9451931,0.0075979535,0.03316866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006811461,0.0001322739,0.017449722,0.0028186168,0.0000646491,0.000980216,0.016359895,0.002429862,0.003252253,0.3898888,0.5663631,0.00019241325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010115561,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049188165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08979158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008375276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012371129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47486895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2547914753","doi":"10.1111/jols.12005","title":"Sociology of Law in Germany: Reflection and Practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law and Political Science","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Bunting; Law; Sociology; Reflection (computer programming); Field (mathematics); Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.045495731081732105,"score_gpt":0.3952513421229029,"score_spread":0.3497556110411708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2547914753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44615462,0.11259409,0.007942798,0.27445135,0.0021125549,0.000075333286,0.00017706423,0.000106120715,0.15638614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97251457,0.01425682,0.0010952187,0.005003438,0.0002022156,0.000026353306,0.000031584845,0.000027333439,0.006842572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902506,0.006438335,0.00034843685,0.00062434626,0.00084965565,0.0014885443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9901308,0.0069939652,0.0007395145,0.0005039784,0.00067033264,0.0009614923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021331089,0.0005072085,0.00047893438,0.0040766257,0.0062617403,0.010736818,0.0015437815,0.0047283196,0.0029824064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015973289,0.000506527,0.0002588718,0.0052828044,0.02001345,0.011579059,0.008455668,0.0030304485,0.00032646907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005576405,0.00011215231,0.004338276,0.00034276934,0.000019672581,0.00039028516,0.12830858,0.0010388327,0.00044036724,0.7790853,0.017621499,0.06824655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031955966,0.00013783357,0.018012501,0.003174974,0.000029564024,0.0004076648,0.27939153,0.0016870251,0.0012820936,0.1075692,0.58818424,0.00009149415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026526505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034287054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026526505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022426596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015342971,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1627171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794227085","doi":"10.1111/jols.12081","title":"‘This Land is Yours’: Ownership and Agency in the Sharing City","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Agency (philosophy); Law; Sociology; Common ownership; Political science; Social science","score_opus":0.056014358758652516,"score_gpt":0.3247803148904409,"score_spread":0.2687659561317884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794227085","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7074027,0.0009552512,0.0043213423,0.019564785,0.000100256555,0.00004249026,0.000055620858,0.000044197208,0.26751336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99411494,0.00010933292,0.00011745224,0.00019059544,0.0000067052174,0.000005884396,0.000005248705,0.000009689911,0.0054402496],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652773,0.0019083833,0.000045255747,0.00023068911,0.00037343756,0.0009144476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812645,0.0005070845,0.00019344623,0.00023484115,0.00024473123,0.0006933975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002563558,0.00023002195,0.00023954612,0.0009373477,0.017691603,0.011794655,0.0011399736,0.00164665,0.0053611724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034121224,0.0002991046,0.00031398234,0.0011698017,0.04880119,0.0068390705,0.009918014,0.0019107579,0.00024885903],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001851123,0.000026073172,0.009431113,0.000018659975,0.000011328169,0.0004572235,0.7381727,0.00021252628,0.00028090255,0.23762964,0.004805516,0.00893583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007941203,0.000028562483,0.010734595,0.00009763306,0.000019262787,0.00032059854,0.7943769,0.00040731727,0.00025421244,0.028282486,0.16542761,0.000042860196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38641816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43210757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38641816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0141167985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009595603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7683379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900154289","doi":"10.1111/jols.12131","title":"Eviscerating Historic Treaties: Judicial Reasoning, Settler Colonialism, and ‘Legal’ Exercises of Exclusion","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saint John Regional Hospital; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Supreme court; Colonialism; State (computer science); Political science; Indigenous; Inscribed figure; Power (physics); Sociology","score_opus":0.014115857256573704,"score_gpt":0.30709606787898863,"score_spread":0.2929802106224149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900154289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37718078,0.0061831907,0.00639282,0.056245334,0.0004644388,0.00009637967,0.00010380994,0.000060598017,0.55327255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9887262,0.0005704153,0.0005455475,0.0016404069,0.000051069215,0.0000138319865,0.000014200762,0.000021211647,0.008417157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890848,0.0033738704,0.00022509732,0.00080325664,0.0034861427,0.003026847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99094474,0.0060557206,0.00052732084,0.00037585117,0.0016112507,0.00048508152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010826739,0.00036180555,0.0004604643,0.0023473941,0.04156017,0.013415697,0.0024923068,0.004018371,0.0033930552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021744428,0.00038597363,0.00034815905,0.002164489,0.06940629,0.0038800528,0.0047384286,0.007960466,0.00015393477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016311069,0.000009325232,0.0011338134,0.00004671232,0.000006424014,0.0006824776,0.39269027,0.0001244242,0.00039780294,0.5915826,0.00452683,0.008783111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024281731,0.000020829588,0.00928195,0.0006060094,0.000041466832,0.0004480913,0.57135355,0.00050133764,0.0011266582,0.10437636,0.31208137,0.00013805415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89524114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9431663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89524114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05867542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06185285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.425722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2918822247","doi":"10.1111/jols.12152","title":"A Strategic Approach to Regulating Unacceptable Forms of Work","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council","keywords":"Dynamism; Legislation; Leverage (statistics); Work (physics); Political science; Expansive; Sustainable development; Business; Public administration; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.027465179808018606,"score_gpt":0.285647101652199,"score_spread":0.2581819218441804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2918822247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04284284,0.0024989855,0.14839676,0.10042796,0.0006948876,0.00031164105,0.00007306822,0.00019737509,0.7045565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95039564,0.0008004823,0.018921124,0.00825979,0.00011709612,0.00034575193,0.00003092529,0.000030676056,0.0210986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781522,0.010194075,0.0009647774,0.002031465,0.0059690285,0.0026884668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99125844,0.003497146,0.0011206175,0.001136683,0.0018947674,0.0010923597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014256293,0.00057887,0.00031067475,0.0024558147,0.006643828,0.011060288,0.0022751766,0.0067809434,0.002738663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010814954,0.00046210247,0.0006483714,0.0015990158,0.04089325,0.0045917295,0.011091051,0.0068207113,0.00067762256],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027477422,0.0000139913645,0.00041179126,0.000027116967,0.0000025795498,0.00004698601,0.0045953076,0.00033412638,0.00019392314,0.9884029,0.0013651603,0.004603233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015035854,0.00007869423,0.0019354294,0.0004839146,0.000013763347,0.00022192295,0.015708627,0.0012258753,0.0007661027,0.8292261,0.15025467,0.000069792004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011184136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02368952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014256293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009925401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026604597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075395405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969948299","doi":"10.1111/jols.12171","title":"Socio‐legal Studies in Poland: Great Heritage, Empirical Accomplishments, Contemporary Challenges","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"European and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Aotearoa; Bunting; Political science; History; Law; Sociology; Geology","score_opus":0.15523434705540673,"score_gpt":0.39808910000586006,"score_spread":0.24285475295045333,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969948299","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25815237,0.5580788,0.005199391,0.06735253,0.0014995253,0.00009286576,0.000477931,0.00006185132,0.10908463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71116054,0.27078688,0.004999825,0.00431947,0.0013928347,0.00017941819,0.00026096668,0.00004758532,0.006852481],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973254,0.0012335159,0.00029870277,0.00023223649,0.00057839864,0.00033171242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99100983,0.004798928,0.0012916003,0.0008596769,0.0012111671,0.00082877127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008579752,0.0003948375,0.0009651493,0.009546915,0.003768991,0.008657489,0.00065760076,0.0013049751,0.0023848168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009774886,0.00048749967,0.00032950184,0.014470704,0.011165984,0.0069865487,0.008513834,0.0017319658,0.00032731707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017343443,0.0003086356,0.03939876,0.005836186,0.00014425315,0.0006706294,0.06511927,0.0005136566,0.00090357324,0.3757327,0.016147368,0.4950515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040838437,0.00019007664,0.18233238,0.011577452,0.00009722535,0.00075608166,0.12154546,0.00045272216,0.0008940647,0.0960914,0.585953,0.00006929899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0089365225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020829655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009546915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005629275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00953373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045374572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981421646","doi":"10.1111/jols.12188","title":"Cause Lawyers, Political Violence, and Professionalism in Conflict","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Economic and Social Research Council; Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast","keywords":"Legitimation; Politics; Authoritarianism; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Political science; Law; Legal profession; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.06107308592062757,"score_gpt":0.4206858060744832,"score_spread":0.3596127201538556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981421646","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6503946,0.0060699685,0.010384903,0.096187375,0.0003898361,0.000059331243,0.00001283346,0.000056413828,0.23644477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99640405,0.00029416772,0.0002546562,0.0009754357,0.000047644124,0.000011867072,0.00000271601,0.000010018708,0.0019994467],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97403926,0.018642204,0.00042092576,0.0010401581,0.0025372668,0.0033202206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97161555,0.019597132,0.003147678,0.0007477157,0.0011119071,0.0037800316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011961127,0.00023238818,0.00053616497,0.002307146,0.025175788,0.015964694,0.0014193469,0.0056968653,0.0036844257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02695711,0.000440567,0.0002645479,0.0014945775,0.07827496,0.009624117,0.016502857,0.008708939,0.00027997972],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016048767,0.00006610663,0.004422929,0.00004729535,0.00000388472,0.0004556557,0.71190757,0.0000976674,0.00012496974,0.27166638,0.001923697,0.009267896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000286497,0.000055730383,0.005489235,0.00026135094,0.0000063125226,0.0010669032,0.7209119,0.00041213707,0.00021771269,0.17986974,0.0916463,0.0000340258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072817663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008172292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025175788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009977389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010308529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07239133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022168296","doi":"10.1111/jols.12225","title":"Economic Crises, Crisis of Labour Law? Lessons from Weimar","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Labor Movements and Unions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Labour law; Capitalism; Constitution; Context (archaeology); Globalization; Economics; Financial crisis; Weimar Republic; Law; Political economy; Market economy; Political science; Keynesian economics; History","score_opus":0.032099488464024675,"score_gpt":0.3127039505500681,"score_spread":0.28060446208604345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022168296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3966386,0.032213584,0.0010047865,0.31848747,0.00055218424,0.000025863992,0.0001547857,0.0000481131,0.25087476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827147,0.006205873,0.00009451466,0.0057507176,0.00015810199,0.0000087243825,0.000019837895,0.000010748423,0.0050366903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908555,0.00038734236,0.00002984156,0.000087097986,0.00007714489,0.00033289255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873716,0.00070269586,0.00021772187,0.000087368804,0.00013205047,0.00012301098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001638151,0.00020288228,0.00033550043,0.001234959,0.003847687,0.003521181,0.0006565899,0.00220708,0.0037150735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037943313,0.00015111771,0.00016616994,0.0012082389,0.0059112036,0.0054529277,0.002896453,0.0028769444,0.0004113586],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009979071,0.0001140992,0.0031331952,0.00019800948,0.000013356497,0.0016917769,0.050586864,0.00079138106,0.00027943368,0.8858372,0.022840124,0.034414783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022905853,0.00012975576,0.020500176,0.0015740006,0.000026140002,0.0011409392,0.10318021,0.0018365438,0.0007593602,0.48424783,0.38650113,0.00008093213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022770576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024500836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022770576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065866513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027937866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047789752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3026495319","doi":"10.1111/jols.12228","title":"The Remarkable Rise of ‘Law and Historical Memory’ in Europe: Theorizing Trends and Prospects in the Recent Literature","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.021497485744481997,"score_gpt":0.26963670667044276,"score_spread":0.24813922092596077,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3026495319","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14216499,0.5971969,0.0031273167,0.062771074,0.0009107679,0.00001819927,0.00008559084,0.000023156548,0.19370198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91774964,0.076567434,0.00041710454,0.0026093724,0.00045902224,0.000015842574,0.00002896018,0.000021441767,0.0021312027],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978781,0.0010186365,0.00011017012,0.00033312212,0.00027033503,0.00038967805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952833,0.0036706931,0.00036620302,0.00025779707,0.00022847943,0.00019360254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050143627,0.00041537854,0.00056997116,0.0058679967,0.0062267072,0.020490063,0.0015908352,0.004965008,0.0026714252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006185757,0.00035569185,0.00033218504,0.009524388,0.04440051,0.02010318,0.0057732137,0.0036044884,0.00019105329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022117649,0.00002016314,0.0015768695,0.00023060442,0.000018051296,0.00023237341,0.09782475,0.0001814321,0.00004638091,0.87286437,0.002656616,0.02432632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020379632,0.00004207755,0.016566925,0.005076159,0.000050500144,0.00068662805,0.2072394,0.00048815005,0.00027672865,0.42460918,0.34487286,0.000071022165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014471254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018911457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020490063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076095234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039369906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055211186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048694886","doi":"10.1111/jols.12242","title":"Ultimate Legality: Reading the Community of Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Jerome's University","funders":"","keywords":"Deconstruction (building); Reading (process); Sociology; Close reading; Revelation; Philosophy; Law; Art history; History; Art; Literature; Political science","score_opus":0.06442069850302223,"score_gpt":0.33112965003835515,"score_spread":0.2667089515353329,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048694886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043164134,0.02070856,0.012392245,0.20378914,0.005727291,0.000081515216,0.00006950179,0.00016840595,0.7138992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9098555,0.005103947,0.0031808326,0.013158943,0.0022178076,0.0000997913,0.00007151875,0.00021872281,0.0660929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922941,0.0056934627,0.00010340231,0.00047232365,0.00093829725,0.0004984319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887476,0.0072556464,0.00046402754,0.0006980912,0.0016015334,0.001233054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056658927,0.00044797856,0.0005384137,0.002208679,0.016219253,0.019096807,0.0014236206,0.00454848,0.008804852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016101357,0.00027693648,0.00027117608,0.0014856735,0.037932593,0.01678638,0.0067429994,0.0072071296,0.0011429797],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014667792,0.000023217128,0.00024272186,0.000065619985,0.0000030808496,0.00025143317,0.13433225,0.00008368658,0.00012979271,0.8028866,0.050004225,0.0119627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009362531,0.00002290051,0.00029397308,0.00063669373,0.0000046290997,0.00020027961,0.10568609,0.00028124076,0.00023532499,0.3440052,0.5486051,0.000019376412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01084162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016610218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019096807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008517108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007124447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06179619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122158359","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00534.x","title":"Neither ‘Public’ nor ‘Private’, ‘National’ nor ‘International’: Transnational Corporate Governance from a Legal Pluralist Perspective","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Corporate Law and Human Rights","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Corporate governance; Legal pluralism; Law and economics; Political science; Global governance; Perspective (graphical); Context (archaeology); Financial crisis; Public administration; Positive economics; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; Law; Comparative law; Epistemology; Legal realism; Management","score_opus":0.05239673846066682,"score_gpt":0.22967776169375145,"score_spread":0.17728102323308464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122158359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16811992,0.008927768,0.095386304,0.1165588,0.0005416409,0.000112277645,0.000033070788,0.00007384205,0.61024636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851302,0.0014414043,0.0047997534,0.0030196728,0.00011794218,0.000069438654,0.00001437888,0.000025791509,0.00538156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879942,0.0075288597,0.00041083116,0.0009904458,0.001975178,0.00110052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618185,0.0019908345,0.00046968213,0.00060736184,0.00041071084,0.00033966682],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009764792,0.00024658008,0.0005735059,0.0012883609,0.0052994885,0.016387016,0.0012274717,0.005109922,0.0016762583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054769083,0.00028792294,0.00054900907,0.0014684191,0.046869382,0.013283547,0.006903763,0.005648482,0.00021362993],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016949103,0.000004256666,0.0001398822,0.00001460815,0.0000017874116,0.0000715611,0.0051209037,0.00016890113,0.00008114064,0.99240464,0.00022946662,0.0017612142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072387597,0.000024303332,0.00065695733,0.00026233387,0.000011126335,0.00023259962,0.0178088,0.0013826726,0.00038967596,0.9203545,0.058849737,0.000019997438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004223608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049444046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016387016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048148246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004889471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051641762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4211256297","doi":"10.1111/jols.12349","title":"Child welfare, Indigenous parents, and judicial mediation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Mediation; Economic Justice; Welfare; Political science; Accommodation; Transformative mediation; State (computer science); Law; Sociology; Alternative dispute resolution; Psychology","score_opus":0.009718979859797581,"score_gpt":0.27554109279760924,"score_spread":0.26582211293781166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4211256297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9495924,0.0010282831,0.00014430792,0.005881879,0.000042294956,0.000024125133,0.000019998108,0.000003722032,0.043262955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99830854,0.00028473296,0.000042188512,0.00020427734,0.0000049690047,0.000005262594,0.0000025229383,8.534619e-7,0.0011466398],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966336,0.00208962,0.00006877075,0.00013136228,0.0003706811,0.0007059359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99495465,0.0024001326,0.0010500865,0.00014001726,0.0006587128,0.0007964051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033584244,0.00010821867,0.00017600082,0.00061596715,0.009174029,0.0037932212,0.0007180927,0.00074693636,0.006069678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011195991,0.000097948905,0.00010498875,0.00075278874,0.0076580867,0.0011254391,0.0027217888,0.0015883332,0.0001152356],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046717712,0.00018003804,0.085558385,0.00011664774,0.000020519881,0.0018027883,0.86506546,0.000098937344,0.0002863486,0.025473204,0.0026535993,0.01869735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007357494,0.000027945893,0.052363977,0.00026149602,0.000013814497,0.0002640232,0.926997,0.00007556351,0.00010089899,0.0016321182,0.018240975,0.000014796643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3512765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52389383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3512765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009378678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012943298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6984637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4213140163","doi":"10.1111/jols.12351","title":"SLSA E‐Newsletter","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Artificial Intelligence Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"School of Law, University of Warwick; University of Westminster; Keele University; University of Sussex; University of Leeds; Queen's University; University of Leicester; University of Exeter; University of Warwick; Northumbria University; Queen Mary University of London; Queen's University Belfast; University College London; Leeds Beckett University","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Information retrieval; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.027576242433732506,"score_gpt":0.2807287988925711,"score_spread":0.25315255645883855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4213140163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010790939,0.003529752,0.0003279515,0.013592822,0.029535655,0.00017141527,0.004063229,0.0013382302,0.94636184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009902659,0.00072106684,0.00009753676,0.0024813933,0.0021646195,0.000055461198,0.0012740568,0.00015498712,0.99206066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992231,0.00011739247,0.000041409585,0.0000896601,0.00039614952,0.00013216639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968714,0.0005082572,0.000108615255,0.0002700608,0.0009522754,0.0012893756],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012673029,0.0010147769,0.0008090968,0.0021516914,0.0016807257,0.005468344,0.0012265075,0.003342521,0.7838435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035643578,0.00044271347,0.00067679066,0.0014937245,0.00051592494,0.0022262533,0.0033520719,0.0024776103,0.65109485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021832218,0.000017914512,0.000056356126,0.000056933823,8.823803e-7,0.000026501924,0.000012858562,0.000007563233,0.00008478303,0.0003717253,0.9772867,0.022055915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068754034,0.000013984443,0.00033010574,0.000051797968,6.916153e-7,0.00001634492,0.00003476967,0.000013040157,0.000026545784,0.00009459872,0.9994086,0.000002650039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035801562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0103134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21615648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014261813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002261341,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30832094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246639292","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-6478.2015.00721.x","title":"SLSA E‐Newsletter","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Queen's University Belfast; Socio-Legal Studies Association","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.09787803011972525,"score_gpt":0.4092254532930785,"score_spread":0.3113474231733533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246639292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011388418,0.00163116,0.00050139136,0.017237276,0.019024557,0.00018291443,0.004385185,0.0021005461,0.9537982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012646669,0.0005319486,0.00014371565,0.0032738068,0.0024447986,0.000052621937,0.0013222343,0.00022948114,0.9907368],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951625,0.000089101646,0.000024203195,0.000051302704,0.00023821245,0.000080958715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99682957,0.000956723,0.00013928597,0.00023673939,0.00095524924,0.00088235014],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010977283,0.00076774624,0.0006203933,0.0015016112,0.0017221072,0.0053088353,0.000937186,0.0028572322,0.794288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033626615,0.00033263472,0.00041322038,0.00130607,0.0004899162,0.0024865225,0.002999719,0.0023300825,0.6121368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023059301,0.000023298922,0.00006508645,0.000063087326,6.235477e-7,0.000026570218,0.000029378201,0.000005172773,0.00009019519,0.00034496697,0.9761677,0.023160994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009414616,0.000014560507,0.0003328574,0.00004616164,6.762433e-7,0.000019682844,0.00008490903,0.000015910115,0.000039058243,0.00015936422,0.99927443,0.0000028943896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019676557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052861935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.794288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009145466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014931415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29342318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4280547611","doi":"10.1111/jols.12359","title":"Invisible labour: legal dimensions of invisibilization","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Digital Economy and Work Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Perspective (graphical); Labour law; Work (physics); Sociology; Legal doctrine; Wage; Relation (database); Labour economics; Economics; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014758394929088528,"score_gpt":0.2646006053297932,"score_spread":0.24984221040070465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4280547611","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09799358,0.0023610676,0.028383723,0.053797506,0.00041096186,0.00007912407,0.000058754948,0.000064042775,0.81685126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898537,0.00038546295,0.0011227399,0.0016430113,0.00016049526,0.00006645841,0.000013055074,0.000023767405,0.006731408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98238933,0.008758958,0.00082249724,0.0017177425,0.004018098,0.002293377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737698,0.016651006,0.002599944,0.0030819087,0.0021677339,0.001729683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01498214,0.0003222162,0.00054390216,0.0027234603,0.009378129,0.015406279,0.002467821,0.005747897,0.007414284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027601546,0.00037667953,0.0005967202,0.0016559646,0.12570594,0.012415433,0.017588653,0.0077563548,0.0005108144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003242646,0.000007062611,0.00017974082,0.000009853743,6.8681095e-7,0.000041732346,0.006507795,0.000029353665,0.000033182663,0.9917121,0.00024051106,0.0012347052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014417928,0.000019296906,0.00076049706,0.00030405738,0.0000053501826,0.00013199661,0.01746413,0.00034425774,0.00020035729,0.9356322,0.045104586,0.000018947343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005990188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044861757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015406279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072777555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009121689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07923406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312153736","doi":"10.1111/jols.12400","title":"The counter‐reparative impacts of South Africa's reparations gap: victims as reparations ‘experts’ and the role of victims’ organizations","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"South African History and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Nexus (standard); Injustice; Political science; State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Perception; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.010280715045715974,"score_gpt":0.26652017347569096,"score_spread":0.256239458429975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312153736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86282665,0.0028346938,0.0025211254,0.035279527,0.00017831013,0.00007323328,0.000032446063,0.000016052963,0.09623786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996855,0.00055490073,0.00013700077,0.00044933718,0.000020330706,0.0000148132785,0.000003453879,0.000004828819,0.0019602617],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99247813,0.0055298544,0.00013482827,0.0002087192,0.000523853,0.0011244882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99447966,0.0036336605,0.0009102137,0.00027756047,0.0003394339,0.0003594627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057452573,0.00044782867,0.00041019477,0.0021452417,0.015157269,0.008681856,0.001125431,0.0029784956,0.0069004847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008214346,0.00030871574,0.0002132933,0.0015411254,0.02962842,0.008574814,0.010611467,0.0037903157,0.00025403794],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013735153,0.000016036382,0.0015279099,0.00009402597,0.0000050792937,0.0013198756,0.8928917,0.00006514169,0.00037026076,0.09872223,0.0008447836,0.0041292515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024115018,0.000020250382,0.0015714803,0.00022692127,0.000005702521,0.00045178182,0.9621731,0.00006854726,0.00023825001,0.007227403,0.028003754,0.000010319512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058364347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008029609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015157269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004662101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005099855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033826053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319454612","doi":"10.1111/jols.12404","title":"<i>Lawyers in Conflict and Transition</i> By KieranMcEvoy, LouiseMallinder, and AnnaBryson, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, 440 pp., £85.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Transition (genetics); Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01885001309155168,"score_gpt":0.2543587121059403,"score_spread":0.23550869901438862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319454612","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009214119,0.81569123,0.00041906832,0.11929299,0.009588334,0.000039438222,0.00015379569,0.00010274462,0.053790838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02955657,0.49160737,0.00093766395,0.054536343,0.008975117,0.00018178968,0.0005511306,0.00027885122,0.41337523],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991322,0.00027129738,0.000037418533,0.00011012317,0.00027542494,0.00017361244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861026,0.00073674787,0.00018109207,0.00004234458,0.00015733208,0.00027216348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012195336,0.0009811041,0.0007100726,0.0013529815,0.0023111205,0.0070191035,0.0014833432,0.003932276,0.03202943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002943627,0.0008435996,0.0003955573,0.0037809752,0.003707156,0.008334786,0.0031344574,0.0060061575,0.013841053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008066859,0.00001403974,0.00015785116,0.00021475578,0.0000030013475,0.000050953204,0.0012799462,0.000023464829,0.00003768612,0.003914309,0.9704927,0.023803405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044248327,0.000008974787,0.0008575702,0.0007801656,0.0000022730412,0.00013775902,0.0020902178,0.000023945893,0.000020980564,0.0025322193,0.9935328,0.0000086423515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020917712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05453331,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03202943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004442378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051792925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107149065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322760559","doi":"10.1111/jols.12407","title":"<i>Lawyers and the Rule of Law</i> By AndrewBoon, Oxford: Hart, 2022, 576 pp., £90.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Legal principles and applications","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Flood myth; Law; Library science; Sociology; History; Political science; Computer science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01624765731057248,"score_gpt":0.28784250873800804,"score_spread":0.27159485142743556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322760559","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039886864,0.72354645,0.00059986557,0.06565025,0.0071322406,0.000020265408,0.00031871913,0.00015377837,0.20217957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020066293,0.2891063,0.00092345005,0.019217014,0.004989018,0.00006433319,0.00040121542,0.00026863115,0.6649637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988625,0.00031146515,0.0000628176,0.00014798454,0.00045653098,0.0001587099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987733,0.00065667013,0.00017237874,0.00006706916,0.00015723445,0.00017323671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010302166,0.0009174734,0.00050251896,0.0012815233,0.002175615,0.0064198305,0.0010657462,0.0036193754,0.11108954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028597915,0.00080792117,0.00027385663,0.0033095793,0.0033963171,0.0074319206,0.001898274,0.0043019895,0.034582365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000875731,0.000007770038,0.000063024854,0.00016510852,0.000001773883,0.000027772423,0.00030933972,0.00004148285,0.000038785816,0.021232443,0.94155,0.036553763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020604941,0.000002622343,0.00020788128,0.00029094645,6.565423e-7,0.0000319432,0.000200792,0.0000139373415,0.000011334577,0.0038602063,0.99537486,0.0000028904894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040275943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095907114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11108954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005344209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043820203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37163156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323322320","doi":"10.1111/jols.12409","title":"‘Wrong’ cases and ‘wrong’ plaintiffs: intergenerational relationships and legal consciousness in China","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Vietnamese History and Culture Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; China; Consciousness; Legal consciousness; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.032473977892870945,"score_gpt":0.29768829756906434,"score_spread":0.2652143196761934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323322320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99555063,0.000084259445,0.00004892335,0.0005180379,0.0000026394243,0.000002837125,0.000007357924,9.113476e-7,0.0037843976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99965405,0.000028285463,0.0000087403605,0.000023311986,0.0000011890434,0.0000010341627,0.0000032994885,3.2016067e-7,0.00027982882],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988047,0.0003383078,0.000051357056,0.00013074136,0.00022174434,0.00045321276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971732,0.0008264454,0.0009229712,0.00009256477,0.00025262436,0.00073220616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017202827,0.00015852266,0.00021702815,0.002553278,0.0047555654,0.0030792258,0.0005720371,0.0006631798,0.0045883656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030298622,0.00019458386,0.00016035978,0.002436299,0.007834077,0.0020471136,0.0031556694,0.0011011746,0.000077069344],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048382706,0.00015047034,0.53227335,0.000061214225,0.000039376,0.001751041,0.3825608,0.00027902078,0.0010269635,0.06459128,0.00077037397,0.016447743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007036363,0.00006199324,0.6434694,0.00009579841,0.000023892455,0.00030151766,0.33317262,0.0009735551,0.00038383473,0.014269333,0.0071972045,0.000043780972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0745775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09360521,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0745775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007242642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004010634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14828682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386805391","doi":"10.1111/jols.12440","title":"Introduction: Political constitutions in transnational society: introducing socio‐legal and interdisciplinary perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Human Rights and Immigration","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Constitutionalism; Political science; Legitimacy; Polity; Sovereignty; Political economy; Constitution; Constitutional theory; State (computer science); Public sphere; Sociology; Law; Democracy","score_opus":0.01697406716412306,"score_gpt":0.3254374746836849,"score_spread":0.3084634075195618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386805391","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006096025,0.12178624,0.017264059,0.20839286,0.19863804,0.00014127002,0.0008292242,0.00032260516,0.44652975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13023707,0.17324612,0.014088466,0.074135184,0.31727913,0.0006465228,0.0016578599,0.0008875247,0.28782207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998425,0.0005942689,0.00009120947,0.00024222293,0.0004901737,0.0001571904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545693,0.0031023233,0.00022588132,0.00023675206,0.00066058326,0.00031749922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015819549,0.00092672335,0.00067936815,0.0040454003,0.004376,0.009713644,0.0013397052,0.003646186,0.02066155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0049493546,0.00040069318,0.0008873444,0.0044678263,0.0070886076,0.007983023,0.004266508,0.008388811,0.0035358209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019043433,0.00004084825,0.00039812506,0.00034119136,0.000010475303,0.00011314287,0.0045573907,0.00028461075,0.00018552007,0.5228719,0.44881475,0.022363037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004048414,0.000020085483,0.00049894437,0.00051228906,0.000004751845,0.00010650767,0.0013831672,0.00021575714,0.000050839328,0.05439313,0.9427981,0.000012400972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021641417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033326645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02066155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028665531,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027865588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06911981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387778034","doi":"10.1111/jols.12448","title":"<i>Applied Legal Pluralism: Processes, Driving Forces and Effects</i> By GhislainOtis, JeanLeClair, and SophieThériault, London: Routledge, 2022, 284 pp., £130.00","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Pluralism (philosophy); Citation; Law; Library science; Sociology; Art history; Political science; Art; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.007101160421346347,"score_gpt":0.2527671524261666,"score_spread":0.24566599200482026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387778034","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022400406,0.5740704,0.0036095094,0.2523977,0.006898633,0.00009149886,0.00018520297,0.00011818179,0.16038883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13488783,0.4976484,0.0066041495,0.040108368,0.016754247,0.0006131131,0.0006297956,0.00063894707,0.30211526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99582005,0.0022554807,0.00012537639,0.00041036634,0.0010632994,0.00032546127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996104,0.0024577174,0.0004406818,0.00021830628,0.00046392914,0.0003153781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004600582,0.0012158985,0.00075817644,0.0022674503,0.004365463,0.014205629,0.0023697084,0.0046346164,0.016411612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065647503,0.0006747009,0.0006319107,0.0070290077,0.021893777,0.013956812,0.006709232,0.006802736,0.0046656122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018639694,0.000041658284,0.00039460554,0.0008444355,0.000013880434,0.00012782557,0.012483002,0.00018629004,0.00012029144,0.2887555,0.6275265,0.06948737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005879661,0.000009103584,0.0009235874,0.0015287019,0.0000035571527,0.00011716839,0.005707759,0.00025434312,0.000067599816,0.09981047,0.8915531,0.000018707757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02095013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029837424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02095013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009927894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00929544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07203227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388441160","doi":"10.1111/jols.12450","title":"<i>Feminist Judgments: Rewritten Criminal Law Opinions</i>Edited by BennettCapers, SarahDeer, and CoreyRayburn Yung, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023, 306 pp., £39.99","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Economic Justice; Criminal justice; Sociology; Law; Library science; Media studies; Criminology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.01859203575634746,"score_gpt":0.26376041457230975,"score_spread":0.2451683788159623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388441160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014623078,0.35429537,0.0031964618,0.09221193,0.055954747,0.000102407845,0.0012244493,0.00035805127,0.49119434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017328577,0.13420898,0.0027513888,0.016304094,0.011237861,0.00016271416,0.0011850053,0.00079624134,0.81602526],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980281,0.0005738934,0.00008071446,0.00013397135,0.0010515532,0.00013188286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982815,0.0008789946,0.00012254925,0.00007460413,0.0005041769,0.00013820299],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016145894,0.0011737847,0.0005632111,0.0016588444,0.0030985787,0.005581598,0.0010514361,0.0018687353,0.05569519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048249043,0.0007200265,0.00037480687,0.0025278027,0.0033489927,0.0042726323,0.0018234547,0.0042949077,0.024723131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006224927,0.000004578785,0.000029552106,0.00013505826,0.0000011535553,0.000033614524,0.0011301864,0.000024092942,0.00009062153,0.008850565,0.95260745,0.0370869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.288879e-7,0.0000017051137,0.00014038436,0.000209425,4.226825e-7,0.000028193213,0.0004161608,0.000010495513,0.000035914258,0.0015614204,0.9975909,0.00000417595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026532196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064727604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05569519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004496279,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006135271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.186319},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392456471","doi":"10.1111/jols.12464","title":"Key book in my education: Hegel's <i>The Phenomenology of Spirit</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Phenomenology (philosophy); Key (lock); Philosophy; Psychoanalysis; Epistemology; Sociology; Aesthetics; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.019778476904881985,"score_gpt":0.2586452911661656,"score_spread":0.2388668142612836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392456471","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018255118,0.05182777,0.0068685333,0.09944788,0.004284829,0.00003459004,0.00013210076,0.00013444568,0.8190146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6996273,0.022844806,0.002088212,0.016715692,0.0014755158,0.000056115066,0.000086455795,0.0001552235,0.2569506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952185,0.00028095415,0.0000100323405,0.00004248295,0.00009649458,0.000048152895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993625,0.00038002068,0.000044242475,0.000046812194,0.000060580984,0.000105793646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007830603,0.0002607151,0.0002121971,0.00080870796,0.002618174,0.0037060184,0.0004005895,0.0008099422,0.007318966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016557218,0.0001238307,0.00018975035,0.0008432773,0.015189183,0.004659336,0.001898339,0.0029280318,0.0009533124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014536078,0.000014029106,0.00027179322,0.00010398504,0.0000034271056,0.00010937019,0.034649767,0.000098171,0.0001474209,0.82920563,0.11913364,0.016248306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007507971,0.000019544226,0.0006180809,0.00068996014,0.000005290534,0.0003331979,0.044765394,0.00013359953,0.00026428222,0.20219597,0.7509538,0.000013396333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053192168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007229241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007318966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034258545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019460217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024856389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392885002","doi":"10.1111/jols.12466","title":"Critique of comparative law: to <i>compierre</i><i>Negative Comparative Law: A Strong Programme for Weak Thought</i> By PierreLegrand, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, 352 pp., £95.00","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Comparative and International Law Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.044083567631393705,"score_gpt":0.34626432151540104,"score_spread":0.30218075388400734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392885002","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015039295,0.36038822,0.003763745,0.5015366,0.016886625,0.000025190811,0.000062254214,0.000080155696,0.115753256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14116774,0.26029912,0.008090872,0.12967037,0.07104939,0.00030061277,0.00025195658,0.0008047132,0.3883652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654514,0.0018665306,0.000061075916,0.00031764535,0.0010327578,0.00017689324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996188,0.0025799307,0.00020869831,0.00019301753,0.0005804083,0.00025011983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036403998,0.0009463098,0.0005562524,0.0018252174,0.0046691783,0.011769765,0.001675262,0.004812234,0.011400133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008142581,0.0003823677,0.00037698148,0.002257218,0.020605946,0.013180526,0.0032547135,0.0070646815,0.0030056757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011436533,0.0000133791045,0.00010273306,0.00020880176,0.0000046470136,0.00006265487,0.0057391534,0.00005563686,0.00010253133,0.27193037,0.6933663,0.028402409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026010484,0.0000050190097,0.00016457053,0.0004685682,0.0000018556265,0.00007841437,0.002113309,0.000056143468,0.00004454319,0.04389757,0.9531611,0.0000063676334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01161185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014977959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011769765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007983726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062381634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057926297},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412015083","doi":"10.1111/jols.12547","title":"Indigeneity, caste, tribe and the limitations of decolonial thought in South Asian socio‐legal studies: The need for a decolonial–debrahmanical approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Law in Society and Culture","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Caste; Tribe; Sociology; Geography; Gender studies; Anthropology; Ethnology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.0530144267543017,"score_gpt":0.34379703851419025,"score_spread":0.29078261175988857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412015083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6633201,0.028387863,0.008691366,0.17460747,0.00060465594,0.00009022364,0.00006574522,0.000025616027,0.12420689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99536884,0.0018568307,0.0007628202,0.0011010374,0.00008707365,0.00004056625,0.0000059433537,0.000008827611,0.0007680815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9776293,0.018966924,0.00071237463,0.0006334822,0.0011448521,0.0009130125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9354735,0.053246517,0.0034118954,0.0027524226,0.003218821,0.0018968824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041003786,0.00037555475,0.0007931265,0.004504213,0.009894316,0.016929548,0.0023384173,0.001697913,0.0018529024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029660648,0.0004375206,0.0002943958,0.0041002915,0.084003545,0.01272387,0.011816406,0.0054412284,0.000115039285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012052384,0.000023386781,0.003720679,0.00019320888,0.0000094783745,0.00011557523,0.3248292,0.00009930736,0.000084071624,0.66265374,0.000553755,0.007705611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011854465,0.000029866735,0.005978633,0.0017742324,0.000023550092,0.0001683209,0.7487118,0.0007432413,0.00021203657,0.21019112,0.03211825,0.000036958732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026025001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043455314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041003786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011863172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013835411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2168513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416458440","doi":"10.1111/jols.70030","title":"The local injustice of bankruptcy: geographical variation in access to debt relief in England","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Corporate Insolvency and Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Debt; Context (archaeology); Injustice; Inequality; Variation (astronomy); Creditor","score_opus":0.010243396387603378,"score_gpt":0.24628836722601458,"score_spread":0.2360449708384112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416458440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984145,0.0001249857,0.000046123718,0.00011434961,0.0000015553948,0.000005164442,0.00020617548,0.0000017516684,0.0010853421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999681,0.000039450213,0.000010865365,0.000007005085,0.0000013232382,0.0000033049816,0.000054505137,0.0000010765609,0.0002014087],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986247,0.0005770224,0.00014255663,0.00024023613,0.00016706786,0.0002486111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905855,0.0027601074,0.0041299923,0.0005269264,0.0011141264,0.0008833694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010215626,0.000102353224,0.00037547777,0.001407628,0.0008745935,0.001729625,0.00060835766,0.00030993784,0.006264726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00763683,0.00020101549,0.0002525356,0.0028329566,0.0017726439,0.0010101849,0.002290234,0.00049531023,0.00043318752],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100322686,0.000052492313,0.97466624,0.00007223877,0.000068492795,0.0005175354,0.018481234,0.00032869424,0.00025209383,0.000840777,0.0005177126,0.0041021807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019379106,0.000025522704,0.9879991,0.000024867879,0.000007737262,0.00006747701,0.011209794,0.00013116961,0.000020294734,0.00012263311,0.00038005682,0.000009482116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13426273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25410715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13426273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018509316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065004383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26696247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W829156627","doi":"","title":"All Together Now: Metro Detroit Is in a Period of Unprecedented Diversity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Society","topic":"Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"White (mutation); Diversity (politics); Rhetoric; Irish; Quarter (Canadian coin); Population; Sociology; Real estate; Beneficiary; Commission; Political science; Law; History; Demography","score_opus":0.03189966045225258,"score_gpt":0.28935393894096567,"score_spread":0.2574542784887131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W829156627","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077822305,0.015826695,0.00030423643,0.34150857,0.024418855,0.00007911318,0.0020780857,0.0003055277,0.53765655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09545365,0.0033775677,0.00040598918,0.043001417,0.0036316414,0.00006504574,0.0007257508,0.000173495,0.8531654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976987,0.00004330041,0.0000063351686,0.000042814194,0.000067447196,0.000070245245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996507,0.00001909734,0.000017963197,0.000019133473,0.000051026484,0.00024203278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025393258,0.00029303823,0.00023555272,0.00028390583,0.009423934,0.004672069,0.0005336219,0.00143016,0.07482865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004905482,0.00017941331,0.00011471176,0.0006994295,0.0010613373,0.0024687732,0.0034718881,0.0029410112,0.01066065],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035907076,0.000024941179,0.002704889,0.00009989876,0.000005560635,0.0010229379,0.008632719,0.0000121453595,0.00096806453,0.007252374,0.94371974,0.03552076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010848339,0.0000054303546,0.0023894657,0.00004075144,7.8566705e-7,0.00020255367,0.006337885,0.0000047482436,0.000040971492,0.00017108796,0.99080104,0.000004179387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035119027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1505933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07482865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018422621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021063646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2503268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}