{"meta":{"query_hash":"9c3ad8527e55","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction"},"cohort_total":14,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":14,"exported":14,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/9c3ad8527e55","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Legal+Affairs+and+Dispute+Resolution+in+Engineering+and+Construction"},"results":[{"id":"W1993849568","doi":"10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000034","title":"Considering Attitudes in Strategic Negotiation over Brownfield Disputes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Brownfield; Negotiation; Computer science; Order (exchange); Process (computing); Management science; Process management; Negotiation theory; Conflict resolution; Decision support system; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Knowledge management; Business; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Civil engineering; Law","score_opus":0.021241602050018134,"score_gpt":0.28054258765775253,"score_spread":0.2593009856077344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1993849568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947527,0.00026346638,0.0029360978,0.000291643,0.0010134814,0.000058449907,0.0000010937384,0.000010446364,0.0006726278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672794,0.0002111057,0.0028941908,0.000007443556,0.00013080305,0.0000016250608,4.2162662e-7,0.0000040786463,0.000022364971],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877125,0.00002814792,0.00059356436,0.00016363425,0.00030010403,0.00014330001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938226,0.00016733051,0.00022129333,0.00008876095,0.00007605865,0.000064274245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008589606,0.00010514276,0.00020324759,0.0006620319,0.00005708628,0.0002284824,0.00008109291,0.00007878583,0.000030357025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019401034,0.000087880166,0.000041622865,0.00039492245,0.00008509859,0.0008792201,0.0000379726,0.0003739313,6.385639e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013400188,0.00005365547,0.7250187,0.00008950956,0.000028235896,0.000033385313,0.00040636168,0.012878618,0.006311278,0.16330358,0.00007686377,0.09166581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025200206,0.00018856327,0.76705444,0.00030312059,0.000026444652,0.0013586099,0.0030921416,0.20636913,0.0002897941,0.012094249,0.0062566996,0.0004468066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000063513435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00029858242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1934905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020246891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038409846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3583649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000734092","doi":"10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000134","title":"Concurrent Delays in Construction: International Legal Perspective","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Apportionment; Damages; Business; Perspective (graphical); Law; Term (time); Breach of contract; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.014025661614702641,"score_gpt":0.2745337551130599,"score_spread":0.26050809349835724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000734092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9672581,0.0009859746,0.019918043,0.002510489,0.0035720929,0.00018774346,0.000004673621,0.000020298075,0.0055425647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99622357,0.00046819792,0.003002594,0.00001132348,0.00020711945,0.0000059311187,7.1086316e-7,0.0000049024425,0.00007566533],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836344,0.000048399022,0.0007493182,0.00022258202,0.00044497912,0.00017126458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910015,0.0001073003,0.00029533345,0.0000848136,0.00032351902,0.00008891335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006659757,0.00013432764,0.00024905006,0.0009637864,0.00006277496,0.00032332249,0.00013406404,0.000069164125,0.00009081267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023142775,0.000114084665,0.00006299758,0.000489988,0.00016433538,0.0015950057,0.00006349523,0.00032017124,0.0000038070318],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118277916,0.000074671814,0.11408708,0.00003730836,0.000077512654,0.000039228038,0.0008353689,0.01144426,0.00043615635,0.43604404,0.0006360427,0.43617007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007103583,0.00048973446,0.2829711,0.00059455645,0.00005821864,0.008264146,0.055982877,0.5494116,0.00015788809,0.016374933,0.07762899,0.0009623519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018138376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004279417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5379673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013082572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055297725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46522376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2158543786","doi":"10.1061/(asce)1943-4162(2009)1:2(67)","title":"Teaching Law on Engineering and Construction Programs","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Patience; Publication; Dispute resolution; Revelation; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.009108507558005574,"score_gpt":0.2661414183617926,"score_spread":0.25703291080378704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2158543786","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9611442,0.00093181257,0.0068682833,0.017108826,0.0016520557,0.00022703827,0.0000023052974,0.00009173936,0.011973758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99013156,0.00025470142,0.009225411,0.00004366853,0.000309607,0.0000017410449,0.0000010168061,0.000004650614,0.000027617776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992327,0.000046128636,0.00028724034,0.00011022943,0.00017061921,0.00015306851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995649,0.000070567934,0.00014303152,0.000041529904,0.00007192109,0.00010808799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005546239,0.000094526236,0.0001353084,0.0002262654,0.00023336944,0.0002213507,0.00003343,0.00008222129,0.0000024668525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016071074,0.00009300296,0.000025516867,0.00019322013,0.00010269832,0.00088858226,0.000006595753,0.00047301117,2.0373864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029010926,0.000035421966,0.0005071169,0.000020252395,0.000010966841,0.000003682384,0.0013699011,0.00074749603,0.00029849925,0.91690546,0.000018837252,0.08005337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050348756,0.0019174016,0.034845505,0.0022272824,0.00021706597,0.0039449134,0.05351146,0.058399204,0.0002649518,0.01464823,0.8233843,0.0016048427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041082915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004361499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9022572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007266404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006370839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37925503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805325611","doi":"10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000267","title":"Visualization of Delay Claim Analysis Using 4D Simulation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"BIM and Construction Integration","field":"Engineering","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Critical path method; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Visualization; Schedule; Path (computing); Operations research; Data mining; Systems engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.006555455917501233,"score_gpt":0.23057001709491212,"score_spread":0.2240145611774109,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805325611","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52716714,0.00049449684,0.47190353,0.000005201994,0.00029754636,0.00002551486,0.0000019188897,0.000016453549,0.000088165405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908706,0.000111460584,0.008850219,0.0000012757911,0.00015338356,6.522782e-7,0.0000022222573,0.000008341796,0.0000018230096],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.999198,0.000019378922,0.00046601717,0.00008413142,0.0001326863,0.00009978466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995561,0.000026960499,0.00014655487,0.00005208391,0.00016730023,0.0000509894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016468059,0.000102074824,0.00021379844,0.00063374866,0.000051551357,0.00004306436,0.000026898233,0.00009233618,0.000006989691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022876355,0.00010012694,0.000060251557,0.000584333,0.000095054136,0.00039946297,0.0000074731965,0.000105903004,8.989404e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004504759,0.000011238178,0.006673459,0.000074785734,0.00015595743,0.0000016479731,0.00024470445,0.95541614,0.0035850268,0.018276863,0.0000029647401,0.015512187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030423154,0.00006371687,0.0040812087,0.000081208964,0.00013904535,0.00012787685,0.00038651953,0.99372447,0.0007162291,0.00012579375,0.00015334383,0.00009638428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000019667497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016405003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46370345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057161207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000019730505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40830582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3005950680","doi":"10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000378","title":"Improving Concurrency Assessment and Resolving Misconceptions about But-For Delay Analysis Technique","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Network Traffic and Congestion Control","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Concurrency; Computer science; Reliability engineering; Programming language; Engineering","score_opus":0.0062392429622512855,"score_gpt":0.2217282029730976,"score_spread":0.2154889600108463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3005950680","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041301455,0.0018702132,0.95569664,0.00077673834,0.00016875031,0.000116969924,0.0000037826014,0.000031407013,0.000034023575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91139364,0.0003204129,0.088122025,0.000017415037,0.00012636915,0.000012067502,9.57389e-7,0.000004003747,0.0000031078139],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914044,0.00003109295,0.00037133414,0.00019368608,0.00011480733,0.0001486571],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994353,0.00008252324,0.00018594375,0.000062974555,0.00009269753,0.00014056257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002888375,0.000111747446,0.00024309396,0.00020753543,0.000098892124,0.00015623448,0.00008208361,0.000063117564,9.406284e-7],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004068947,0.000104445186,0.00006849071,0.00032256427,0.00005215475,0.00047040443,0.000039959217,0.00021528237,3.2801736e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009028697,0.000045303714,0.007367538,0.00024861665,0.0003447022,0.00003512199,0.000630142,0.0767396,0.0074068266,0.19793496,0.00007226756,0.70908463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065565744,0.00015003458,0.003554387,0.00007559846,0.00010208928,0.00018525062,0.00024187597,0.9941767,0.000029841187,0.00008664461,0.0006118501,0.00013007146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001295828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000037372474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9174371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003632488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005983673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4259151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006753349","doi":"10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000388","title":"Characteristics of Stipends and Their Value-Adding Potential in Design-Build US Highway Construction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Stipend; Procurement; Agency (philosophy); Competition (biology); Process (computing); Work (physics); Value (mathematics); Funding Agency; Business; Finance; Computer science; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.01878310457725002,"score_gpt":0.24162751872273613,"score_spread":0.2228444141454861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006753349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.894729,0.0004463759,0.103667445,0.00037577018,0.000568472,0.00008402144,0.0000069575726,0.000010652977,0.00011127901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99097335,0.0007359991,0.008141816,0.000009158502,0.00012737313,0.0000011933055,7.4885185e-7,0.000005513722,0.000004837191],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985178,0.0000732,0.00079593755,0.00019520015,0.00027514348,0.00014271554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992012,0.00012663838,0.00040493326,0.00006636009,0.000105831255,0.00009506645],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007967112,0.00013504521,0.00034337325,0.0005400639,0.00006061468,0.00012723173,0.000083207706,0.00007460607,0.0000083447785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020714107,0.00011035867,0.00004794576,0.0004728148,0.00014843969,0.0006494874,0.00005868584,0.00024407059,2.1133249e-7],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012910307,0.000064113294,0.24742757,0.0003403957,0.00010642334,0.00005412517,0.0018997174,0.052571516,0.013670361,0.047791008,0.000091595626,0.63469213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026951043,0.00047977545,0.21186364,0.0003863474,0.000053210508,0.0013375025,0.0048119617,0.7720371,0.0007869019,0.0013896751,0.0037676557,0.00039116637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000024037525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000029614096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71946555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026624832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003882863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45002958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011216540","doi":"10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000391","title":"Review and Survey of 4D Simulation Applications in Forensic Investigation of Delay Claims in Construction Projects","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"BIM and Construction Integration","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Argument (complex analysis); Computer science; Scope (computer science); Stakeholder; Dispute resolution; Event (particle physics); Risk analysis (engineering); Operations research; Law; Engineering; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.013300325486150347,"score_gpt":0.21569715941777448,"score_spread":0.20239683393162414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011216540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.953704,0.008917477,0.03686122,0.0000970374,0.000117970514,0.00024890527,0.000011091403,0.000015575331,0.000026718608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929277,0.0035959706,0.0034224605,0.0000057606,0.000024749374,0.0000074153677,0.000007929933,0.000007843804,2.1232405e-7],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894786,0.000047413992,0.00069948024,0.000113638365,0.000099759585,0.00009186464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995,0.00007125637,0.00020372563,0.00004732938,0.00011841393,0.00005931414],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028353863,0.000112320995,0.00031930444,0.00032223496,0.000018210158,0.000016131538,0.000028817509,0.0000935131,0.0000010614756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059244896,0.0001149198,0.000025385785,0.0005621318,0.00011885188,0.0003588649,0.000009867655,0.00021602132,2.9614174e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016941864,0.00003435383,0.3712649,0.0057640355,0.00007153488,0.0000034763923,0.0011412814,0.5038328,0.0058923173,0.0217242,0.000020870842,0.09008075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001411046,0.00016857033,0.2763422,0.0019472028,0.000071268776,0.0002193769,0.0010525138,0.7169093,0.00085504923,0.00064573926,0.0001164026,0.00026130106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008459728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009979518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21307646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044425018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040994782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46862933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191066931","doi":"10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000489","title":"Ontology for Linking Delay Claims with 4D Simulation to Analyze Effects-Causes and Responsibilities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"BIM and Construction Integration","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Ontology; Computer science; GRASP; Causality (physics); Negotiation; Workbench; Taxonomy (biology); Multidisciplinary approach; Liability; Risk analysis (engineering); Knowledge management; Data mining; Visualization; Software engineering; Law; Accounting; Business","score_opus":0.004404616675288333,"score_gpt":0.21025981862314624,"score_spread":0.20585520194785792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191066931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6913788,0.0015013157,0.3065626,0.00009551653,0.0003219156,0.00007576506,0.0000030169524,0.00002515936,0.00003595886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779611,0.00020614911,0.021679398,0.000007693845,0.0001159094,0.0000075346857,0.00000222311,0.000010819152,0.000009141527],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993396,0.000024457302,0.00029179666,0.00012519136,0.00008857094,0.00013039273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995131,0.00016873068,0.00005609286,0.00005159018,0.00013331922,0.00007714833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015576207,0.0001181247,0.00020954173,0.0002509281,0.00007020903,0.00009169067,0.000018446433,0.000089726134,0.0000010608863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060592996,0.000106784755,0.000030014491,0.00016573087,0.000053660387,0.00028274226,0.000008994699,0.0001553955,4.6524864e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041987954,0.00001743962,0.007129052,0.0005871218,0.00013390412,0.00003166202,0.00061970914,0.8611717,0.0071181017,0.050933234,0.000015142749,0.07182305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021154054,0.00054152537,0.017300379,0.0008988719,0.0001381258,0.0029178236,0.0023757308,0.96504045,0.0026230086,0.0015583616,0.0040843906,0.00040593825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000063348634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006483119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28658238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005428946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037485195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43545562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4365140265","doi":"10.1061/jladah.ladr-948","title":"System Dynamics as an Assistive Tool to Delay Analysis in Identifying Productivity Losses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Productivity; Complement (music); System dynamics; Computer science; Change order; Order (exchange); Industrial engineering; Operations research; Risk analysis (engineering); Reliability engineering; Systems engineering; Project management; Engineering; Economics; Business; Artificial intelligence; Project planning","score_opus":0.01900701687505179,"score_gpt":0.2951036740359024,"score_spread":0.2760966571608506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4365140265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97056997,0.00006946408,0.028224833,0.00020522028,0.00058157736,0.00009244604,0.0000048233505,0.000026909478,0.00022474358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980042,0.0000647266,0.0017722266,0.0000022934794,0.000083854386,0.0000043323366,0.0000019909926,0.0000046132604,0.000061766084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842477,0.00007070369,0.00063029333,0.00026033042,0.00044190182,0.00017197728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993434,0.00008320678,0.000213021,0.0001271575,0.00015034714,0.000082849285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019314621,0.00011097841,0.000296895,0.0023254731,0.00009103285,0.00028238047,0.00010481069,0.000052286803,0.0000040768105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029566535,0.00009628162,0.00006474102,0.0030201103,0.000045043947,0.0010735481,0.000061974846,0.00017867725,0.0000024073136],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030222422,0.000045348723,0.45337647,0.00014862003,0.00016883507,0.0001153023,0.00082392443,0.27549258,0.00036248832,0.046045087,0.000051381085,0.22306775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036497388,0.00008748276,0.45839942,0.0001171003,0.00005883527,0.00031631452,0.00671217,0.53292483,0.000019696445,0.00032490987,0.00051683467,0.00015744564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00011999077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003328318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25743225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013231601,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038992534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39262503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388745081","doi":"10.1061/jladah.ladr-1059","title":"Evolvement of Excusable Delay Clauses in Government Contracts since the COVID-19 Pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Government (linguistics); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Business; Virology; Medicine; Disease; Outbreak","score_opus":0.020247451264098326,"score_gpt":0.21156143576066824,"score_spread":0.19131398449656992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388745081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98929596,0.0035284155,0.005018865,0.000693743,0.0006224927,0.0001296244,0.00003193844,0.000011609814,0.0006673515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968686,0.0028644237,0.00013712698,0.000021573753,0.000082778395,0.0000044947083,9.3920335e-7,0.0000059503636,0.00001409503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895376,0.000015581845,0.0007056578,0.000120355704,0.000054204138,0.00015045509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993727,0.000092860195,0.0003805532,0.00006604886,0.000014673685,0.00007312298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094218215,0.00007411632,0.00028923358,0.00016247391,0.00004520907,0.00003659225,0.000057802852,0.00006209557,0.0000041154294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011686479,0.00007518761,0.000046100078,0.00016656691,0.0000835218,0.00022394884,0.000023806793,0.00013256379,0.0000010380244],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019328608,0.00006703409,0.48891845,0.00025409317,0.00009315579,0.000023686145,0.001044755,0.13941692,0.00027235542,0.36750695,0.00022841815,0.0019809157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010601103,0.000785484,0.3974286,0.00088763225,0.00006513045,0.0013453271,0.012663891,0.41543028,0.000120025696,0.037116684,0.1224354,0.0011204382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005621097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016019995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33039024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023635374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028940736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30660617},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414351927","doi":"10.1061/jladah.ladr-1319","title":"Analysis of Three-Party Contracts and Their Impact on Project Costs and Timelines: A Case Study of Construction Delays","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Construction contract; Contract management; Project management; Construction industry; Construction management","score_opus":0.019939074505082244,"score_gpt":0.3093890547857437,"score_spread":0.28944998028066143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414351927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928118,0.00065588683,0.005925418,0.000045634075,0.0002170488,0.00019160999,0.000012877974,0.000006341545,0.00013339795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990986,0.0003061486,0.0005572623,0.000002420768,0.000023358569,0.0000025605752,7.0386756e-7,0.0000031061934,0.0000058549977],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855745,0.00007307122,0.000822441,0.0002093671,0.00022241409,0.00011524596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987842,0.000325272,0.00047879198,0.00012043808,0.00023569365,0.000055636334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010244742,0.00015463313,0.00052147754,0.0018496237,0.00008400461,0.000095884345,0.00005449519,0.00006589998,0.0000034849143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001712829,0.00010364912,0.0000806777,0.0012199475,0.00016644469,0.00042757828,0.00004551212,0.00017750156,2.6530827e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00097608496,0.0001845841,0.5885812,0.00010770025,0.001107637,0.000055676373,0.0014845233,0.01990707,0.0005176393,0.005571392,0.000031409472,0.38147506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042127403,0.0014058754,0.26583543,0.0003737804,0.00080971024,0.003620378,0.046837866,0.6756802,0.00013481303,0.0005278558,0.00026187635,0.00029943572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004706451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003314591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65577316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036077126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054738655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42266887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414354050","doi":"10.1061/jladah.ladr-1335","title":"Framework for 4D Simulation Collaboration in Construction Delay Claims","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"BIM and Construction Integration","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hydro-Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Scheme (mathematics); Construction management; Construction industry; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.004342310570247853,"score_gpt":0.23480132422669123,"score_spread":0.23045901365644336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414354050","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31532824,0.0012449302,0.681425,0.00018477648,0.0014608782,0.00015464646,0.0000058131045,0.00003947681,0.00015624797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.957576,0.00039354665,0.041866064,0.0000060194684,0.00012511178,0.000014302174,0.000003819262,0.000009652074,0.0000055338996],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905616,0.00002144857,0.00054686714,0.00012770659,0.00010040481,0.00014741831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995416,0.00011781369,0.00010627286,0.00005954039,0.00012790336,0.00004690902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021594089,0.00013929365,0.00022452348,0.0006090747,0.000067809684,0.00011203608,0.000034272576,0.00019065036,0.0000021488618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078436555,0.00014509863,0.0000436296,0.0004783772,0.00007191767,0.00052060105,0.00000738117,0.00027342036,9.2868746e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010807961,0.000012075185,0.0030922205,0.00016500945,0.000027968545,0.0000019366223,0.00012816433,0.6110074,0.00058944564,0.32985982,0.00001925197,0.054988664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011805056,0.00007372832,0.0037035092,0.0005239705,0.000033996563,0.00015328752,0.0016404161,0.9740125,0.00033760883,0.015271496,0.0028858536,0.00018310579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000008280127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029784462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6422477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001538172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005544791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5916951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117310311","doi":"10.1061/jladah.ladr-1420","title":"Exploring Teaching Methods for Construction Contract Law Using Analytic Hierarchy Process","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Construction contract; Process (computing); Subject (documents); Hierarchy; Analytic hierarchy process; Rank (graph theory); Construction management; Construction industry","score_opus":0.07719071824035535,"score_gpt":0.3895350119398864,"score_spread":0.31234429369953104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117310311","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40461457,0.0005779691,0.5922879,0.000287728,0.0013423739,0.00015189078,0.0000021792137,0.000017747348,0.00071765523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8986601,0.00015748084,0.10101157,0.000011898172,0.00012413217,0.000007883927,5.107971e-7,0.000005781135,0.000020600648],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838907,0.000099488214,0.0008380372,0.0002356554,0.00024241654,0.00019534762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99884593,0.00039982176,0.00035846903,0.00010319244,0.00022293579,0.00006966268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002487468,0.000144965,0.00035587465,0.0010319866,0.0002472738,0.00028598026,0.0001006589,0.00006333008,0.0000034149355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005041469,0.00012487042,0.00008376801,0.0005319131,0.00014472938,0.0016208985,0.000037457114,0.00030558658,8.976787e-8],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021531596,0.00002004426,0.003727703,0.00016520738,0.0000632652,0.0000034599652,0.0002955599,0.025229935,0.0016683434,0.3175485,0.000009118532,0.65105355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002134424,0.00016118043,0.0036814588,0.0005888508,0.00014127222,0.0010010732,0.006769438,0.9488622,0.001015325,0.015907556,0.019403607,0.00033360955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004122655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008640229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92363226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076584976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000069339905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50920683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117316631","doi":"10.1061/jladah.ladr-1320","title":"Governance Strategies for Execution of Public Building Projects","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction","topic":"Construction Project Management and Performance","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Project governance; Corporate governance; Integrated project delivery; Transaction cost; Database transaction; Project management; Good governance; Building information modeling","score_opus":0.025470376966296848,"score_gpt":0.2941280663628407,"score_spread":0.2686576893965439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117316631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6371806,0.0012870001,0.35909334,0.0005233544,0.00083187665,0.000129207,0.000004279303,0.000009458203,0.0009408594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99090457,0.00039718184,0.008556315,0.0000037259772,0.00005498202,0.0000043110317,3.2646378e-7,0.000002488583,0.00007611225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988934,0.000027871949,0.00057864643,0.00013704615,0.00024154065,0.00012150693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918866,0.0001455071,0.00034068085,0.00007388789,0.00022134092,0.000029917199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010901976,0.00008333199,0.00020904666,0.00052016525,0.0000668015,0.00021872386,0.00009075257,0.00005073282,0.0000018743041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030994162,0.00006923686,0.00005651102,0.00055047584,0.00008666067,0.0012991943,0.000033844044,0.00010992523,4.4299018e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010549768,0.000018062436,0.008856134,0.00015091874,0.000028391476,0.0000010876578,0.00011596325,0.003916965,0.0019291342,0.82709944,0.00015603707,0.15762237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071732155,0.0008566889,0.14870675,0.0019364118,0.00015780062,0.0007105246,0.028995717,0.6275592,0.0027271407,0.07317057,0.10721947,0.0007865255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000016525046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000012525971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7539289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000038326016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106765765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28233972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}