{"meta":{"query_hash":"d60b4ad0058e","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Legal Anthropology"},"cohort_total":4,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":4,"exported":4,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/d60b4ad0058e","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Legal+Anthropology"},"results":[{"id":"W2901037125","doi":"10.3167/jla.2008.010105","title":"The Effects of Elusive Knowledge","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","topic":"Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Centrality; Corporate governance; Enforcement; Population; Subject (documents); Sociology; Public health; Political science; Law; Public relations; Medicine; Business; Nursing","score_opus":0.014901065918087163,"score_gpt":0.2519544963706568,"score_spread":0.23705343045256966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901037125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22955954,0.0044556335,0.015262845,0.067546114,0.0007178119,0.00013789041,0.00024985688,0.00015803515,0.6819123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9873574,0.0007555411,0.001229182,0.0023758926,0.00023308497,0.00006359931,0.00008292272,0.000075749515,0.007826576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9676723,0.015030605,0.0011345111,0.0037951008,0.00929587,0.0030714937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9073407,0.05281199,0.0096598985,0.01693516,0.00821114,0.00504117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021738937,0.0007038168,0.0010577721,0.006290006,0.013787148,0.013785565,0.0034310566,0.0055131293,0.021058137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08117612,0.0006871812,0.0008843868,0.0037148953,0.0663942,0.022804182,0.028421465,0.0084981145,0.0019205796],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017683207,0.00012703001,0.01497691,0.00023925651,0.000060130467,0.0010522414,0.09849131,0.0005167512,0.00057536596,0.84373343,0.0066364636,0.033414237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011023185,0.00011995659,0.009665589,0.00062633527,0.00007968056,0.00101672,0.09871502,0.00076482433,0.00062374823,0.7379573,0.15023652,0.000084044754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011261947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005949594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021738937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007138151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071416865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11496782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901591875","doi":"10.3167/jla.2008.010106","title":"Riding Along with Police","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","topic":"Policing Practices and Perceptions","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Ethnography; Enforcement; State (computer science); Order (exchange); Sociology; Criminology; Process (computing); Public relations; Law; Political science; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.06003572969198386,"score_gpt":0.39460301155075395,"score_spread":0.3345672818587701,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901591875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.917509,0.0015856527,0.0020857516,0.021817138,0.00096077245,0.00017477521,0.00017396951,0.00011272772,0.05558022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9605828,0.0012160696,0.0013999767,0.0040797982,0.00012531536,0.00008702938,0.00008752178,0.000056118737,0.03236539],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665725,0.0017292335,0.00015340224,0.00050901395,0.00036695416,0.0005841013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948403,0.00079942605,0.00094596145,0.00036465228,0.0008380962,0.0022115496],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028117383,0.00043819973,0.00040588458,0.0009771907,0.021282395,0.0040422585,0.0009902465,0.0016132686,0.012428297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009717273,0.00068491866,0.0002732104,0.000809369,0.006339213,0.0050679436,0.005540979,0.0035860294,0.002387158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055251414,0.0000925603,0.02473746,0.00014475615,0.000012277746,0.000848448,0.91335505,0.000041725765,0.0008842296,0.0040688626,0.024588494,0.031170953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034957213,0.00010744209,0.007961843,0.000093263836,0.0000048473107,0.00052587094,0.8770993,0.000028908686,0.00025755735,0.00039400748,0.1135015,0.000021943793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02120664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05543381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021282395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025064813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002841569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042166412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296144073","doi":"10.3167/jla.2022.060106","title":"Addressing Serious Harm, Reconsidering Policy and Building Towards Repair","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","topic":"Ethics in medical practice","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Framing (construction); Academic freedom; Argument (complex analysis); Sociology; Law; Political science; Higher education; History","score_opus":0.20706088193510408,"score_gpt":0.541312309250335,"score_spread":0.33425142731523094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296144073","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038174912,0.012673277,0.013501888,0.90753627,0.0045166244,0.00007146371,0.000026399499,0.00014452019,0.057712123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5506056,0.024358338,0.024902673,0.35308555,0.0080692815,0.0005715214,0.00010759123,0.00063667836,0.037662808],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9411826,0.032179628,0.0037715165,0.0059045516,0.009430616,0.0075310897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9068891,0.06303963,0.0059921066,0.0082166465,0.00958882,0.0062737595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06312677,0.0014258982,0.0017906373,0.003896403,0.019038053,0.03278147,0.009350487,0.04875722,0.0111386655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09640801,0.0007241529,0.0015376133,0.0018971746,0.10259776,0.06414256,0.027735421,0.031256527,0.003528785],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015663065,0.00005168267,0.00033582273,0.0005196027,0.000014397657,0.00038724797,0.04559332,0.00044792742,0.00021412947,0.8963857,0.039535973,0.016498456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008356091,0.00002934071,0.00018191228,0.0019040435,0.000014869559,0.000282946,0.070008844,0.00031017596,0.00031094067,0.5864185,0.34048533,0.00004463849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01029619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010118713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06312677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015430013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04973909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33385026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318977071","doi":"10.3167/jla.2022.060205","title":"In support of free-standing Indigenous legal systems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Anthropology","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Tsing Hua University","keywords":"Indigenous; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Economic Justice; Criminal jurisdiction; Work (physics); Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.026374138948550112,"score_gpt":0.33179440830931395,"score_spread":0.30542026936076383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318977071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3673851,0.0007751313,0.0022458723,0.02027601,0.000113847025,0.00007985061,0.00006477795,0.0000426158,0.60901684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915677,0.00010394392,0.0004191154,0.00046045904,0.000012473217,0.000009275356,0.000009599018,0.0000069089174,0.007410424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923143,0.0018636923,0.0001809129,0.0006950637,0.0019231843,0.0030229343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872552,0.0036536595,0.000999847,0.0012212041,0.0043213335,0.002548613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065138717,0.00019455011,0.00034169256,0.0021543342,0.02929575,0.010496156,0.0026905905,0.0017954311,0.009398142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0152751375,0.00023145569,0.00019907358,0.0017058882,0.041812196,0.0031595116,0.0075210915,0.003736029,0.00033890866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022562464,0.000029754236,0.0049273088,0.000049081806,0.000010448465,0.00055042485,0.25358328,0.00016017864,0.00047332034,0.7206961,0.004271691,0.015225817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040126666,0.00006777516,0.029569587,0.00040085873,0.00006354404,0.000697408,0.457908,0.0013031192,0.001140099,0.17289829,0.33580935,0.000101806625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71528506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85259056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71528506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029367935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059848316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57278335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}