{"meta":{"query_hash":"4b7aa2dd7745","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4b7aa2dd7745","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Legal+Ethical+and+Regulatory+Issues"},"results":[{"id":"W1495673338","doi":"","title":"Catalysts for Change in Board Governance Practices: The Case of the Introduction of National Policy 58 - 201 in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Issuer; Accounting; Context (archaeology); Mandate; Best practice; Business; Stakeholder; Political science; Public relations; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.024725446364468842,"score_gpt":0.28690514622377306,"score_spread":0.2621796998593042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495673338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6622932,0.013377407,0.0011377715,0.10670259,0.0006181557,0.00028709116,0.0005817636,0.000039470044,0.21496254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97588193,0.0042845802,0.0005132942,0.0059350636,0.000059922553,0.000034685443,0.0001295734,0.000016068247,0.013144824],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98308176,0.0027051999,0.00049536006,0.0011883694,0.007768199,0.004761073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96404094,0.011135147,0.0038168244,0.0010407213,0.015752647,0.004213739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011730999,0.00023832255,0.0004638461,0.0030483913,0.021805502,0.013174151,0.0026585828,0.0030558957,0.002571384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02737607,0.0003889637,0.0004125615,0.007955719,0.011977169,0.003136766,0.002778687,0.0043574576,0.00014543884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016096514,0.00019353248,0.082219176,0.0009233804,0.000101945116,0.0069297827,0.41702443,0.0018875963,0.0010916727,0.3021638,0.06501558,0.122288175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047790556,0.000073902935,0.1921376,0.0013497506,0.00008566075,0.00029405378,0.31669334,0.0009859563,0.0007479416,0.0060403566,0.48135453,0.00018908239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99207133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99518496,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27204123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27204123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26818308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.844329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520196410","doi":"","title":"The Effects of Legal Environment on Voluntary Earnings Forecasts in the U.S. versus Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Voluntary disclosure; Incentive; Business; Turnover; Productivity; Accounting; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Management","score_opus":0.005434849896398244,"score_gpt":0.20791376492188854,"score_spread":0.20247891502549029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520196410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741199,0.00054604665,0.00012433993,0.0048805815,0.000053283668,0.000029850375,0.0012795627,0.000018287654,0.018948134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970733,0.0002672406,0.00006906207,0.00029421176,0.000010355789,0.000004619331,0.00039347852,0.000005736714,0.0018820171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99583507,0.00028715882,0.00016217357,0.00030239933,0.0021362852,0.0012770083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652183,0.0059138765,0.008820544,0.0005350086,0.013907985,0.0056042797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019125729,0.0002036451,0.00027000482,0.0021145348,0.0056710937,0.0033257029,0.0009924051,0.0007137504,0.005759198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02473535,0.0001825505,0.00032191988,0.003959014,0.0016467707,0.0007739076,0.0013327929,0.0013583938,0.0002138174],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053223653,0.00016223917,0.9338559,0.00008238921,0.0000833344,0.0005681149,0.009686086,0.0017560264,0.00079707254,0.006657733,0.014983522,0.03083549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028239696,0.00006119258,0.96996665,0.00013782822,0.00005381764,0.000068220674,0.018350953,0.001592817,0.0004224342,0.0004851289,0.008759633,0.000073169445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9945688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058239818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29457504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523232684","doi":"","title":"Has the US Economy Exhibited Less Uncertainty during the Greenspan Era","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monetary policy; Economics; Volatility (finance); Keynesian economics; Inflation (cosmology); Inflation targeting; Monetary economics; Money supply; Interest rate; Central bank; Economy; Macroeconomics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.043402912834528073,"score_gpt":0.24309642128972622,"score_spread":0.19969350845519815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523232684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8825894,0.008059583,0.0010405002,0.039790634,0.00036856465,0.00001599377,0.0037676303,0.000034496927,0.064333245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99461913,0.0020986658,0.00012857314,0.0014725269,0.00018909558,0.0000051651327,0.00059689145,0.000010761119,0.0008791011],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99944156,0.000118736185,0.000054067248,0.00011814048,0.00013666425,0.00013081862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996763,0.00046294287,0.0017788174,0.00018741276,0.0005418481,0.00026596087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013259731,0.00016031391,0.00024405171,0.001014397,0.00088229525,0.0032294132,0.0002749156,0.00092973607,0.004089788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005263915,0.0001270291,0.0002836634,0.0020445923,0.001358656,0.0038186256,0.0013503111,0.00096821575,0.0003394801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008490335,0.00014273597,0.6658014,0.00055746164,0.00036589225,0.0010737826,0.011027729,0.008304468,0.0011509211,0.13779862,0.030077571,0.14285044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027410419,0.00019776101,0.7117362,0.0009494186,0.000079048266,0.0003589784,0.014844326,0.0031458498,0.0011306034,0.07974182,0.18763344,0.00015519718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023153579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017184777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023153579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017974783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010788424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046037614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551762230","doi":"","title":"How \"Cybersafe\" Are the BRICs?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"BRIC; Intellectual property; International trade; Treaty; Dominance (genetics); China; Business; Extortion; International business; Emerging markets; Economics; International economics; Economy; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.08798371947050958,"score_gpt":0.2501263930377238,"score_spread":0.16214267356721423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551762230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055523172,0.14818667,0.0061823325,0.26131,0.0035024178,0.00005618067,0.00075913017,0.00014045175,0.5243397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77331793,0.11608075,0.0019129078,0.039846815,0.0029124666,0.00007892894,0.00034085548,0.000094003284,0.065415315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983565,0.0005398294,0.00005185889,0.00029178208,0.00048245487,0.00027752414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982041,0.0007961025,0.00035007004,0.00009299936,0.00038293595,0.00017381928],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013031116,0.0004970111,0.00027301224,0.0016001984,0.0034546528,0.01072928,0.0007139114,0.0031037028,0.013638004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004091249,0.00023720473,0.00024413038,0.00257919,0.010718894,0.007855629,0.002728808,0.0043217773,0.0017581542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056042558,0.000038479888,0.006740829,0.00072042714,0.0000147533465,0.00050540647,0.022655593,0.0005982892,0.00036733653,0.71996534,0.12374457,0.12459287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003873216,0.000039992774,0.006954998,0.0022502998,0.000012873993,0.0005361768,0.024916023,0.000195985,0.0003030049,0.07787009,0.8868896,0.000027139911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011372839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008294638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013638004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038533185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031062386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0456236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608533998","doi":"","title":"The NCAA Death Penalty: A Review of Legal and Business Implications","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Basketball; Championship; Football; Competition (biology); Institution; Schedule; Competitor analysis; Distribution (mathematics); Athletes; Political science; Business; Public relations; Management; Marketing; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.07937378707442912,"score_gpt":0.4607648997016232,"score_spread":0.3813911126271941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608533998","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017485102,0.6899637,0.0018527865,0.1560006,0.010584411,0.00018986371,0.00067843316,0.000097680815,0.13888404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028050717,0.84510094,0.0024981229,0.09800967,0.009237688,0.00043357658,0.0006908555,0.00009176212,0.015886638],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842972,0.0026021264,0.0014003904,0.0011767013,0.009318528,0.0012049697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94399047,0.028993092,0.0036184518,0.00093607476,0.020884812,0.0015771148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01781288,0.0011748737,0.0010501562,0.014171774,0.0074624936,0.009450156,0.00503798,0.012989147,0.012506901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068169616,0.0006941907,0.0015089528,0.013402827,0.011356761,0.0076971836,0.003473309,0.012281162,0.0025286134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029910252,0.0001585205,0.002417215,0.0024397434,0.00003185831,0.0005797825,0.00061206764,0.0006318151,0.00007903777,0.19039065,0.5124839,0.2901455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010286693,0.000034247932,0.0043198173,0.018037507,0.00003589159,0.0005155865,0.0011214203,0.00023835001,0.000087450986,0.018035062,0.9574964,0.000067898385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08525831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09518179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08525831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014974969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039930377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16952407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105947242","doi":"","title":"Faculty Ethics from the Perspective of College of Business Administrators","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical code; Scrutiny; Business ethics; Information ethics; Curriculum; Morality; Engineering ethics; Applied ethics; Political science; Meta-ethics; Legal ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.18998328286205965,"score_gpt":0.4656754621631458,"score_spread":0.27569217930108614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105947242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6514636,0.004082534,0.0013426463,0.20546487,0.0008709917,0.000089558984,0.000040997696,0.00003083009,0.13661392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98499495,0.00083709264,0.00021904267,0.008347871,0.00026507955,0.000021722128,0.0000064504666,0.0000069927064,0.005300866],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814873,0.011392037,0.0003499014,0.0005146716,0.0019904894,0.004265615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764712,0.007330118,0.00259619,0.0003596428,0.002670305,0.010572597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072963405,0.000260823,0.00027648456,0.0017681363,0.01946279,0.015401764,0.001316803,0.0039232387,0.005141128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014379375,0.0003301373,0.00029036784,0.001330704,0.015997184,0.003397933,0.0050708847,0.0060328613,0.0004566453],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000073806215,0.00078232883,0.07183964,0.00019820272,0.000028183735,0.0024778673,0.59722817,0.00043810697,0.001383052,0.24168381,0.044798877,0.039067905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016996299,0.00015996458,0.02916906,0.0002999579,0.0000115915645,0.0007984023,0.7714328,0.0004965077,0.00046770886,0.017069397,0.18002544,0.00005219376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025850976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034239896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025850976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01733234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021366704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12575549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595658265","doi":"","title":"Health Care in Canada to Overcome Income Inequality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic inequality; Inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Income distribution; Income inequality metrics; Development economics","score_opus":0.01563873283441302,"score_gpt":0.33455084057223167,"score_spread":0.31891210773781864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595658265","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038087778,0.05627502,0.0026708476,0.3216643,0.0046852287,0.00041629677,0.011015523,0.00047811164,0.5647069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66134214,0.065116584,0.011055851,0.088701084,0.0024347703,0.00039978584,0.007653631,0.00024218654,0.16305393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944502,0.00041870106,0.00011824825,0.00021950765,0.0023750763,0.0024183663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927885,0.00048905844,0.00035133815,0.00016573042,0.0039870855,0.0022183072],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020062919,0.00044355047,0.00044659985,0.0034010604,0.0063441014,0.005091239,0.0021152322,0.0015649721,0.022464821],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00889785,0.000185135,0.0007300691,0.005951123,0.0018441323,0.001296139,0.0033163656,0.0026172528,0.0011717277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060203372,0.000120788754,0.042444367,0.0009179573,0.00006584793,0.0004566557,0.0026239364,0.0007884435,0.0003090989,0.13883503,0.5623525,0.25102523],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004507808,0.00004847998,0.09419682,0.0021209624,0.0000671468,0.00021275545,0.0044826693,0.00092210824,0.000408997,0.0064998446,0.8909431,0.000051997933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99511886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09712975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09712975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25393882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70472896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597716474","doi":"","title":"Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising - in the Perspective of Competition Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Advertising; Competition (biology); Advertising account executive; Business; Native advertising; Online advertising; The Internet; Advertising campaign; Purchasing; Perspective (graphical); Advertising research; False advertising; Marketing","score_opus":0.026200180085190653,"score_gpt":0.3427071307310277,"score_spread":0.31650695064583706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597716474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01661507,0.043297518,0.016776152,0.07206293,0.0018543437,0.000084261424,0.000121121535,0.0000472502,0.84914136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88959163,0.020621348,0.0062650032,0.019224284,0.0065710223,0.00015036637,0.000080917154,0.000060814076,0.057434652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98358744,0.008111361,0.0007748874,0.0021801898,0.0040403893,0.0013056878],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9665151,0.025591712,0.0022131882,0.0012804645,0.0035427848,0.0008567058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010742782,0.0005338305,0.00064057426,0.0032055944,0.0070295203,0.016941614,0.0017666044,0.015570425,0.008719673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023967171,0.0005671308,0.0007512502,0.0026083803,0.046119444,0.015240639,0.004166717,0.01125587,0.0011271852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030695546,0.0000057578695,0.000067771245,0.000027138489,0.0000015089186,0.0000959235,0.0006845048,0.000055755027,0.000014380562,0.9957541,0.0015264413,0.0017637061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011900108,0.000023048753,0.00038391643,0.000416917,0.000012864508,0.0003918398,0.00088404544,0.0006758244,0.00011681535,0.9181046,0.07894507,0.0000331063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01050498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058416193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016941614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009495943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052894442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0688982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W266256500","doi":"","title":"The Factors of Age and Sex on the Perception of Ethics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Quarter (Canadian coin); Public opinion; Business ethics; Public relations; Applied ethics; State (computer science); Psychology; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.24486778637446743,"score_gpt":0.42602523244682927,"score_spread":0.18115744607236184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W266256500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967456,0.00024733384,0.00006410015,0.0002575522,0.000025132164,0.000011877821,0.00006857695,0.0000017259736,0.0025779267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991479,0.00009457115,0.000038147133,0.00005788157,0.000011568467,0.000006322406,0.000027158574,0.0000018447076,0.0006145564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797386,0.0010222545,0.0001410518,0.00015270984,0.00040745037,0.00030263062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98027277,0.010263734,0.004756088,0.0004232898,0.0015221606,0.0027618497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002255247,0.00017170199,0.00020608284,0.00059138023,0.00056593335,0.0012185432,0.00023895144,0.0003430134,0.00839304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012292834,0.00015037744,0.00043027868,0.00042249763,0.00068201136,0.0005796081,0.0005652485,0.0005660278,0.0006031098],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001866119,0.00024491875,0.98733574,0.000017817647,0.000035801368,0.00013744317,0.004308139,0.000024533918,0.0003453636,0.00011305465,0.00027982923,0.006970787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066431817,0.00022898093,0.99035126,0.000029801595,0.00001796417,0.00016953844,0.008040459,0.00011487879,0.00012563055,0.000081739156,0.0008240971,0.000008995223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031997585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00536665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00839304,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037292502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005264851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028077543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969756608","doi":"","title":"Cryptocurrency Circulation in the Global and Domestic Financial Systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Economic Issues in Ukraine","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cryptocurrency; Legalization; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Government (linguistics); Digital currency; Criminalization; Currency; Business; Finance; Economics; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Monetary economics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.01643157511471295,"score_gpt":0.26371027296903304,"score_spread":0.2472786978543201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969756608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7361144,0.06878648,0.010060161,0.008376222,0.00029204704,0.000058530964,0.00064590183,0.00008223507,0.17558411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825837,0.012737598,0.0006712044,0.00015192854,0.0001335563,0.0000055778155,0.000091689544,0.000008397139,0.0036164108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993649,0.00020345922,0.00005460047,0.0000769281,0.00020026341,0.00009994267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998697,0.00040388518,0.00060260727,0.000057909434,0.00017333883,0.00006524932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005171125,0.00013100181,0.00017547983,0.001771953,0.00045319757,0.0028306164,0.00014508162,0.00043345543,0.0013285651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021825305,0.000080840575,0.00013168376,0.0026272507,0.0011060502,0.0018310446,0.0005977597,0.00050763076,0.00013516769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118207616,0.00006857709,0.11346534,0.00063863775,0.00008833859,0.0038120984,0.0053576156,0.008970183,0.0018595692,0.70866066,0.008473358,0.14848742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001711409,0.00022500692,0.39945635,0.0013662342,0.00014469108,0.008414669,0.013136485,0.018660491,0.003448833,0.14689724,0.40812427,0.00010858058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005475594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038374837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005475594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022642564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012367424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01642847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969861416","doi":"","title":"Legal Status of Cryptocurrency as Electronic Money","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cryptocurrency; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Virtual currency; Digital currency; Legal tender; Currency; Business; Government (linguistics); Electronic money; China; Commerce; Finance; Economics; Law; Monetary economics; Political science; Engineering; Payment; Computer security","score_opus":0.014541317852117683,"score_gpt":0.3348489698553468,"score_spread":0.3203076520032291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969861416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07695584,0.0067374585,0.0132680945,0.030846864,0.0010120461,0.00012712831,0.00035597858,0.00015428483,0.8705423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93041676,0.0023967652,0.007045835,0.008460164,0.0006479967,0.00021931736,0.00027483673,0.00006717741,0.05047108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99022233,0.0030910333,0.0009485602,0.0011945567,0.0034833855,0.0010601713],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98653424,0.0059910575,0.0018218076,0.0018284932,0.0032618805,0.0005625464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006872104,0.00022811136,0.0003373176,0.0016264011,0.0049088704,0.011278249,0.0011776565,0.005730426,0.005297064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019272972,0.00027809435,0.0003686615,0.0018764767,0.013196773,0.006368544,0.0030086222,0.0050770375,0.0012744531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008479344,0.000010485391,0.00027165137,0.000028180073,0.0000022165216,0.0000701789,0.0014801925,0.000047968348,0.00026739214,0.98883235,0.0026758155,0.0063051726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039182232,0.000080744336,0.0032533621,0.0007670708,0.000037553433,0.0007121742,0.0029299392,0.0011666865,0.0025510984,0.34966356,0.63869715,0.00010150253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01030723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005102403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011278249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038414195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00925602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036343575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W301381734","doi":"","title":"Internet Denial of Service Attacks: Legal, Technical and Regulatory Issues","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Denial-of-service attack; Internet privacy; Computer security; Revenue; Business; Government (linguistics); Denial; Stalking; Internet service provider; Service (business); Computer science; Law; Political science; World Wide Web; Finance","score_opus":0.02096618055943347,"score_gpt":0.2965563797856557,"score_spread":0.27559019922622224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W301381734","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026207658,0.05877655,0.008527253,0.7057641,0.0024196266,0.00014994037,0.0001147928,0.00031192135,0.1977281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74691427,0.06551008,0.01246466,0.13767797,0.0070271897,0.00023218902,0.00017940604,0.00016801993,0.029826276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9736118,0.0076983,0.001492264,0.0013560919,0.013416896,0.0024246946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91871935,0.045771297,0.009214859,0.0032761255,0.019915031,0.0031033282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0222818,0.0004835763,0.0005448044,0.0037245632,0.0040360396,0.019004669,0.0025846593,0.015629703,0.004438326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037522547,0.00061649014,0.00078321074,0.0028984656,0.009305,0.009430889,0.002865729,0.009119198,0.0015794676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000656887,0.00033543966,0.009525493,0.00087617314,0.000029053605,0.003009432,0.003778677,0.0030549602,0.001474321,0.60873634,0.1309965,0.2381179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003662557,0.00020098586,0.015888045,0.004661119,0.0000544056,0.005733354,0.011318492,0.005777759,0.0018529551,0.22883971,0.7253808,0.00025577194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008306496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061691785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0222818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075852703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00919104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1178388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096587143","doi":"","title":"The Legal Delegation of Medical Responsibility: A Comparative Framework","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Conceptualization; Legislature; Public relations; Context (archaeology); Business; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Health care; Political science; Law; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04623468116306778,"score_gpt":0.38355282097835863,"score_spread":0.33731813981529085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096587143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04540631,0.009396032,0.040321663,0.040084127,0.00023517404,0.00009630092,0.000048486912,0.000025141368,0.86438686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855058,0.0023470244,0.0044426895,0.0018311149,0.00017347951,0.00012588807,0.000015706913,0.000015875747,0.00554227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9701772,0.022364214,0.00053048047,0.0011129283,0.0034874333,0.0023276913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755593,0.017939463,0.002104691,0.0013410632,0.0021953564,0.00086009287],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021659486,0.00039164248,0.00063227996,0.0046180426,0.009013164,0.01293848,0.0022344762,0.007029793,0.006622184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02405419,0.00039009293,0.00065269554,0.0029431554,0.06286316,0.01384225,0.0076546343,0.00418928,0.0003193013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019544616,0.000004197186,0.00007200233,0.000008695436,0.0000011940983,0.000025994284,0.0016457018,0.00007224313,0.00000821842,0.99731964,0.00013195147,0.0007082185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003480272,0.00005812755,0.0021223046,0.00065586925,0.000025236444,0.00033249252,0.018878415,0.0015693086,0.00017168772,0.89851326,0.077604145,0.000034379613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010632027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00836179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021659486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01867186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00940563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1354745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114977971","doi":"","title":"State Regulation over Operations with Military Goods as an Protection Element of a State National Security","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Element (criminal law); State (computer science); License; Sanctions; National security; Order (exchange); Control (management); Business; Law; Computer security; International trade; Political science; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.03035691500505091,"score_gpt":0.27459227667864217,"score_spread":0.24423536167359125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114977971","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47279373,0.0011440148,0.032202218,0.0047588907,0.00009115416,0.00010615949,0.0001170974,0.000062312014,0.48872438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928833,0.00017963022,0.0012441443,0.00013482531,0.000023639199,0.00002132457,0.000025001806,0.0000046194027,0.0054834806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748945,0.0008253069,0.00010657885,0.00030630245,0.0008894867,0.0003829206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99624914,0.0014193142,0.0011383815,0.0004505109,0.00055315264,0.00018955582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018195949,0.00009465992,0.0001748725,0.0006536919,0.0014509134,0.0038363906,0.00037608985,0.0008991504,0.003078636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037206747,0.00015117263,0.0003721288,0.0007142723,0.0044891452,0.0015448476,0.001332737,0.0015564228,0.0002014032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025143447,0.000032422937,0.008153084,0.000034068304,0.000013238135,0.00018752621,0.0021174888,0.0034433764,0.00089489296,0.9726748,0.0008752649,0.011548732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003198567,0.00037902078,0.17164288,0.0006899986,0.00014324624,0.0012502844,0.008601408,0.027045157,0.0042592594,0.5800205,0.20581515,0.000121160854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008344305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007401924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008344305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034027984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036967408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024689138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176314956","doi":"","title":"Administrative and Legal Regulation in the Field of Subsoil Use in Ukraine and Foreign Countries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsoil; Legislation; Political science; State (computer science); Administrative law; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Law; Field (mathematics); Public administration; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03330552804395808,"score_gpt":0.3511521810594128,"score_spread":0.3178466530154547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176314956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8714801,0.006257866,0.0025580714,0.002212717,0.000083204155,0.000024914465,0.000055932378,0.0000322646,0.11729478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99478155,0.0010760091,0.0003122376,0.00014487682,0.000011281098,0.000008954245,0.00002175148,0.0000046606388,0.0036387641],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998243,0.00069529755,0.0001381547,0.00021367637,0.00036069978,0.00034919105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985593,0.0004594482,0.0005085747,0.00011431266,0.0002561243,0.00010229501],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013158439,0.00008887694,0.00018991233,0.0009924826,0.0026753717,0.0029462145,0.00031861255,0.00038934505,0.0008099087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019677288,0.000119369564,0.00021391896,0.0015614266,0.003658021,0.0007854058,0.0018999433,0.00073114445,0.00011207698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000079084995,0.00009389649,0.095891684,0.0004227277,0.00005407249,0.002790965,0.14059691,0.0034757217,0.002987443,0.6627307,0.0029154832,0.08796131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012061332,0.00012839632,0.46886066,0.0009115067,0.000083879844,0.0019273845,0.14872734,0.0026062843,0.004231914,0.033830848,0.3385692,0.00011050957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04244728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02935544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04244728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048827846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061167832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.084400415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182658448","doi":"","title":"Issues of Subsidy on International Trade: A Case Study Between the United States and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Opposition (politics); Duty; International trade; Political science; Economics; International economics; Law","score_opus":0.049169992868311085,"score_gpt":0.2730090761750033,"score_spread":0.22383908330669222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182658448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7652697,0.0034204188,0.00063572294,0.010350987,0.00009006182,0.00012959454,0.00025106466,0.00001844938,0.21983401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885684,0.0021129043,0.00038299744,0.001656943,0.000016894483,0.000021583162,0.00009583241,0.000011993985,0.0071325484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995,0.000928831,0.00011411864,0.00026222802,0.0014027646,0.002292154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460924,0.002375539,0.0003587507,0.00019734602,0.0016121244,0.00084692985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027410304,0.00043650102,0.00053256296,0.002635483,0.02406683,0.008243252,0.0016787171,0.0044064866,0.0035953477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00761091,0.00029074238,0.00061018043,0.0075559216,0.0067452868,0.0018778408,0.0041538225,0.004492247,0.0001590893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030786445,0.0010901021,0.18826082,0.00051907357,0.000233871,0.044246897,0.20683841,0.009146087,0.0016897459,0.40218234,0.0657011,0.079783686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008261033,0.00013202301,0.088327006,0.00094258384,0.00024233077,0.0033056599,0.6454361,0.0058717504,0.0011396208,0.0095504,0.24479493,0.00017497082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98223555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079451725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079451725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.076197214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5764653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}