{"meta":{"query_hash":"4b7aa2dd7745","filters":{"venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues"},"cohort_total":16,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":16,"exported":16,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/4b7aa2dd7745","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?venue=Journal+of+Legal+Ethical+and+Regulatory+Issues"},"results":[{"id":"W1495673338","doi":"","title":"Catalysts for Change in Board Governance Practices: The Case of the Introduction of National Policy 58 - 201 in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Corporate Governance and Law","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Issuer; Accounting; Context (archaeology); Mandate; Best practice; Business; Stakeholder; Political science; Public relations; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.024725446364468842,"score_gpt":0.28690514622377306,"score_spread":0.2621796998593042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1495673338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8629584,0.00053276966,0.0000018284734,0.1359087,0.00027386876,0.00011053999,0.0000050202484,8.8565895e-7,0.00020799573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957083,0.000063219515,0.000014834544,0.0016980503,0.0024192506,0.0000025612185,6.7698454e-7,0.000004628265,0.00008850416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910843,0.000037050613,0.00036525147,0.00007962771,0.0003169871,0.00009266554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814844,0.00012432407,0.0013508234,0.000090004156,0.00027808562,0.000008333731],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010684939,0.00006844817,0.00019018239,0.000050568695,0.000049807397,0.000025031626,0.00013598369,0.00006683402,0.000006242054],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000888248,0.000037965157,0.000046495334,0.00023937425,0.00010978829,0.0005190422,0.000046308156,0.0003312693,1.4120421e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008348471,0.00022187878,0.049871903,0.0012605569,0.00009263051,0.000087285276,0.0013122761,0.0006094484,0.002213288,0.8382777,0.08735497,0.017863229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010645688,0.000042676715,0.28312942,0.00031672404,0.000040574978,0.00012995549,0.00058871764,0.0013759803,0.00057244784,0.009186258,0.7034131,0.00013951652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6844747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7981858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8290914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008546534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030940294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31762642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1520196410","doi":"","title":"The Effects of Legal Environment on Voluntary Earnings Forecasts in the U.S. versus Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Earnings; Voluntary disclosure; Incentive; Business; Turnover; Productivity; Accounting; Economics; Actuarial science; Microeconomics; Management","score_opus":0.005434849896398244,"score_gpt":0.20791376492188854,"score_spread":0.20247891502549029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1520196410","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501461,0.0010739402,0.000057187804,0.046813063,0.000470271,0.0001393272,5.0241607e-7,0.000005492712,0.0012941373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948282,0.00021192116,0.000037252557,0.0028447993,0.0012972171,0.000002582413,6.550725e-7,0.000013517423,0.000763849],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981815,0.00007016103,0.00043390875,0.00014637278,0.00092324865,0.0002447656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957331,0.00052428414,0.003504372,0.00016200896,0.000055221484,0.000021015952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011471041,0.00016328685,0.00024649044,0.00006923031,0.00022414513,0.0001262606,0.00036664124,0.00009765629,0.00002338887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018871934,0.00009178636,0.000082675695,0.00012033312,0.00022715931,0.0003875129,0.00012047526,0.0011071716,0.000005209465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00328543,0.0005552142,0.0348903,0.0013859213,0.00061102444,0.0010941192,0.002346906,0.007440311,0.0014110275,0.17665274,0.25452015,0.51580685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008077369,0.00011479783,0.11429475,0.00018122059,0.000045857672,0.0000072713915,0.0002417545,0.00019987211,0.000105377185,0.00015679903,0.88373643,0.00010812213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021108605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025327997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6292163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000089642825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059007914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9924572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523232684","doi":"","title":"Has the US Economy Exhibited Less Uncertainty during the Greenspan Era","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Monetary policy; Economics; Volatility (finance); Keynesian economics; Inflation (cosmology); Inflation targeting; Monetary economics; Money supply; Interest rate; Central bank; Economy; Macroeconomics; Financial economics","score_opus":0.043402912834528073,"score_gpt":0.24309642128972622,"score_spread":0.19969350845519815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523232684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9079189,0.001463605,0.0000101581145,0.088214874,0.0005230789,0.00008279152,0.000017532,0.000008590688,0.0017604872],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943526,0.00016988389,0.00007305937,0.0028322812,0.0012713643,0.00000191754,9.483044e-7,0.000015339841,0.0012826305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985915,0.000056650544,0.0008093923,0.00019864285,0.000052363088,0.00029146645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870497,0.0001786418,0.0005846785,0.00032974198,0.000035863945,0.00016612334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017127584,0.00017635443,0.0004499063,0.000110120374,0.0005092473,0.00029302292,0.00038182555,0.00030687137,0.00027870672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012713259,0.000103584505,0.00021537629,0.00007415948,0.00069478207,0.000325351,0.00007029886,0.0021225663,0.000035905872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007205925,0.0002701248,0.13857605,0.00026682878,0.0012423388,0.0001273979,0.010848244,0.00871778,0.0024606308,0.8060497,0.026419992,0.0043003205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008523165,0.00011678742,0.23867767,0.00003047769,0.00002462564,0.0004806554,0.00022932305,0.0033903925,0.0002526089,0.04147186,0.71418446,0.00028883826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00095432886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00027870553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76457787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033484477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038926803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9221613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1551762230","doi":"","title":"How \"Cybersafe\" Are the BRICs?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Intellectual Property and Patents","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"BRIC; Intellectual property; International trade; Treaty; Dominance (genetics); China; Business; Extortion; International business; Emerging markets; Economics; International economics; Economy; Political science; Finance; Law","score_opus":0.08798371947050958,"score_gpt":0.2501263930377238,"score_spread":0.16214267356721423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1551762230","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7176661,0.009691592,0.000115038754,0.2613806,0.0022315658,0.00013035379,9.3340157e-7,0.000032841974,0.008750993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820954,0.00008391488,0.00003836773,0.009102137,0.004818516,4.848088e-7,4.30643e-7,0.000010957084,0.003849743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990698,0.000037839032,0.00022006164,0.00007227485,0.0003819313,0.00021810565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926865,0.00007745785,0.00028220323,0.00009588633,0.0002432949,0.000032519794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009975351,0.00011735703,0.00020359874,0.00007686092,0.00024911127,0.00037073137,0.00018503556,0.00018850574,0.000079517544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033371165,0.000057174166,0.00010763719,0.00012769269,0.00021116601,0.0010985959,0.00008679624,0.0008650862,0.000035748544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009860301,0.00059920753,0.04657703,0.00087618927,0.00061558164,0.00017079194,0.0042794123,0.000041848038,0.004391477,0.3398927,0.56871706,0.032852687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020950966,0.000021711245,0.012317445,0.00009575649,0.00006030229,0.00006725142,0.00092124386,0.000079686855,0.00019866419,0.0018811703,0.9840306,0.000116683485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000470961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000062932186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4153135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009777237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000113199685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37584174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608533998","doi":"","title":"The NCAA Death Penalty: A Review of Legal and Business Implications","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Legal Issues in Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Basketball; Championship; Football; Competition (biology); Institution; Schedule; Competitor analysis; Distribution (mathematics); Athletes; Political science; Business; Public relations; Management; Marketing; Law; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.07937378707442912,"score_gpt":0.4607648997016232,"score_spread":0.3813911126271941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608533998","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025657904,0.9464296,0.0000035752732,0.049124252,0.0006538781,0.0003890818,0.000009901995,0.000010473897,0.0033535408],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00013632166,0.99508286,0.00028923425,0.00040602367,0.0015393993,0.000012340675,0.000004382645,0.000023521225,0.0025059339],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960263,0.0011809593,0.0013057389,0.00023748903,0.00097340444,0.00027612597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99516016,0.00080291677,0.0015296772,0.0003389954,0.0018243009,0.00034393696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061829938,0.0002774763,0.00156054,0.00012137056,0.00054356124,0.00023117293,0.00060815254,0.00064466544,0.000023718267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024671673,0.00015628315,0.00029180685,0.0005086608,0.0014859469,0.0003846247,0.00012661035,0.00160445,0.0000035074038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012052149,0.00007776675,0.000014000165,0.02489571,0.00019254805,0.000010687119,0.0020529043,1.0915638e-7,6.480176e-7,0.2908553,0.02784851,0.6540398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074475385,0.000053612403,0.000089706424,0.033527974,0.0006579685,0.00018106331,0.0002680647,1.2192368e-7,2.1199297e-7,0.003383279,0.96159196,0.00017158578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043250926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009549217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016263826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031148926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6970626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2105947242","doi":"","title":"Faculty Ethics from the Perspective of College of Business Administrators","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethical code; Scrutiny; Business ethics; Information ethics; Curriculum; Morality; Engineering ethics; Applied ethics; Political science; Meta-ethics; Legal ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.18998328286205965,"score_gpt":0.4656754621631458,"score_spread":0.27569217930108614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2105947242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85719347,0.002042497,0.0006048482,0.13849969,0.00094335794,0.00006417668,0.0000893373,0.0000035583216,0.00055909617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99717474,0.0001876878,0.0012167441,0.0006181903,0.0005176234,2.0956885e-7,0.0000010508768,0.000006703011,0.00027705103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99593586,0.000363586,0.0011978128,0.00019247222,0.0021666386,0.00014363835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98409474,0.008155134,0.0011277918,0.00029432037,0.006202198,0.00012579656],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013321583,0.00012783364,0.0004820049,0.00014167011,0.00019738788,0.000054170283,0.0005393378,0.0006344442,0.00007048106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016662285,0.00006547533,0.00014756207,0.0007227866,0.0015091399,0.00024242155,0.00007979072,0.0018939011,0.0000013790425],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078228547,0.00037178033,0.014916155,0.00008673553,0.00018224999,0.000047373254,0.0390006,0.00007908711,0.006292406,0.9204838,0.015006857,0.0027506438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004498014,0.00019622293,0.54548293,0.00035191065,0.00007006269,0.000063618514,0.05423499,0.00001378527,0.0074640713,0.33142966,0.06009359,0.0001493782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004139106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002869597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58905417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003384494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009760576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9916208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2595658265","doi":"","title":"Health Care in Canada to Overcome Income Inequality","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Canadian Policy and Governance","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic inequality; Inequality; Economics; Demographic economics; Income distribution; Income inequality metrics; Development economics","score_opus":0.01563873283441302,"score_gpt":0.33455084057223167,"score_spread":0.31891210773781864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2595658265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.598918,0.0013414728,0.0000029413843,0.39927518,0.00017895167,0.00004157747,0.00003126973,0.0000019882455,0.00020857851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98406917,0.00024603863,0.000047148154,0.014438017,0.000405692,4.470221e-7,6.679876e-8,0.000003810735,0.0007896371],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848294,0.0002888007,0.00035671788,0.000095659416,0.00051768526,0.00025819257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899065,0.0001751657,0.00016071543,0.00007952298,0.00009984134,0.0004940975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009615155,0.000068774665,0.00026897207,0.00006119557,0.00012831818,0.000024429386,0.00015031907,0.000113006674,0.000032036427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000440979,0.000045165405,0.00003717861,0.00014227767,0.00015430992,0.00014706366,0.00002565879,0.00036341386,0.0000012221396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00050127355,0.000058256017,0.13822995,0.0002766031,0.00006214922,0.0004680561,0.11405657,0.000026544485,0.00030875008,0.41933066,0.21392499,0.11275619],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021804133,0.00007129387,0.25988904,0.0002065894,0.0000013645002,0.000005858701,0.0009208272,1.1741558e-7,0.000022632996,0.0011130313,0.73747694,0.00007423199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98571306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.523552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011637157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004716681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8367189},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2597716474","doi":"","title":"Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising - in the Perspective of Competition Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Intellectual Property Law","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Testimonial; Advertising; Competition (biology); Advertising account executive; Business; Native advertising; Online advertising; The Internet; Advertising campaign; Purchasing; Perspective (graphical); Advertising research; False advertising; Marketing","score_opus":0.026200180085190653,"score_gpt":0.3427071307310277,"score_spread":0.31650695064583706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2597716474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9100488,0.0014896989,0.000014251192,0.07684306,0.0000829644,0.00010319993,0.0000011494018,0.0000029948883,0.01141392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988363,0.00034374656,0.00009227306,0.0004745279,0.00011054833,4.3987612e-7,2.3817242e-8,0.0000026519263,0.00013948543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867,0.00051152974,0.00027733008,0.000074040174,0.00035648476,0.0001106146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916714,0.00049579097,0.00011012059,0.000040754498,0.00014633703,0.000039843504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019293125,0.000053252876,0.00017378607,0.00005936708,0.00010549533,0.000029338064,0.00009894205,0.00012532638,0.00003641505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070240785,0.000025566382,0.000028437391,0.00008759586,0.0009962724,0.00020628006,0.000020726138,0.00031896422,5.7430356e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118812735,0.000075120086,0.0018032137,0.000014866845,0.000013140024,0.00003186716,0.051064067,0.0000018327222,0.011175779,0.9335726,0.00016259249,0.0019661328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0047785062,0.0020163127,0.13318084,0.0048752483,0.00008296785,0.00020336593,0.07489039,0.000044260625,0.019619526,0.5327846,0.2269385,0.0005854914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00299697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002955775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40078798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006490431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006412244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4530542},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W266256500","doi":"","title":"The Factors of Age and Sex on the Perception of Ethics","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Ethics in Business and Education","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Quarter (Canadian coin); Public opinion; Business ethics; Public relations; Applied ethics; State (computer science); Psychology; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.24486778637446743,"score_gpt":0.42602523244682927,"score_spread":0.18115744607236184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W266256500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89489204,0.0011313605,0.000027189153,0.10310874,0.00033158675,0.000035747427,0.0000013091445,0.0000016585852,0.00047034468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996067,0.001994254,0.000077485165,0.0004568198,0.00015765738,2.5930174e-7,8.475358e-8,0.0000039921283,0.001242452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972267,0.0005441994,0.0006372059,0.00010942151,0.0013917926,0.0000906883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99050736,0.008094918,0.0005163509,0.00021646163,0.0006022038,0.000062728766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007975572,0.00008375804,0.00024337762,0.00008116833,0.00033376992,0.00012926332,0.00028957607,0.00035187852,0.00008810958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006578757,0.00003269782,0.000088196866,0.00016991101,0.0013608091,0.00013386847,0.000047362257,0.001592974,0.0000012103841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024511656,0.00047009863,0.029875437,0.00023165726,0.00018323053,0.000020934918,0.17941642,0.00018224375,0.020897528,0.66066545,0.037138313,0.070673555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003615986,0.00070265646,0.5133207,0.0004725857,0.000060291914,0.00006221,0.04383728,0.00038248967,0.0024995748,0.26933268,0.16876282,0.00020517512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003624186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000020145228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48344523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009626693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005611527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7875862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969756608","doi":"","title":"Cryptocurrency Circulation in the Global and Domestic Financial Systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Economic Issues in Ukraine","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cryptocurrency; Legalization; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Government (linguistics); Digital currency; Criminalization; Currency; Business; Finance; Economics; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Monetary economics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.01643157511471295,"score_gpt":0.26371027296903304,"score_spread":0.2472786978543201,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969756608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9710057,0.017630562,0.000055711575,0.0059935884,0.00087791716,0.00014010971,0.000010772451,0.000004242944,0.0042813877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99870306,0.00031023598,0.000101413076,0.00041406424,0.00035926624,0.0000016022896,7.557156e-7,0.000005666305,0.00010391803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880975,0.00006475649,0.0007289828,0.00017261918,0.000071315844,0.00015254135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924445,0.00012330626,0.00039164015,0.00014301673,0.0000386784,0.00005892241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017528575,0.00011004947,0.00042070064,0.00009781402,0.000048162616,0.00011311515,0.00016068353,0.00025395514,0.00003369746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024445468,0.000084228464,0.000060901,0.00011292895,0.00014103907,0.0002355408,0.00003486818,0.00057248434,0.000023334393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030002317,0.000034246696,0.091515645,0.00009697055,0.00001714973,0.000022231385,0.001352892,0.00038400968,0.0000088133165,0.9059635,0.00022994894,0.00034460583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012905936,0.00027845762,0.6014782,0.00019890365,0.000013237889,0.0005088847,0.00022184083,0.002559423,0.000001706396,0.1960654,0.19712622,0.00025713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000073746545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008067641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7098981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006922223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033979733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3434737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969861416","doi":"","title":"Legal Status of Cryptocurrency as Electronic Money","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cryptocurrency; Circulation (fluid dynamics); Virtual currency; Digital currency; Legal tender; Currency; Business; Government (linguistics); Electronic money; China; Commerce; Finance; Economics; Law; Monetary economics; Political science; Engineering; Payment; Computer security","score_opus":0.014541317852117683,"score_gpt":0.3348489698553468,"score_spread":0.3203076520032291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969861416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9380568,0.0036262958,0.000016441909,0.004991831,0.00042217702,0.00010311292,0.0000047630742,0.000012548609,0.052765995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99624133,0.0018055382,0.0000462725,0.00036122306,0.00035117328,3.6247457e-7,0.0000010603279,0.000005941664,0.0011870676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982126,0.00015022827,0.0004554301,0.00009146358,0.00069806917,0.0003922216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990092,0.00012964477,0.00021969916,0.00007785655,0.000296367,0.00026725893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080324267,0.00009605785,0.00028390245,0.00009698634,0.00010809037,0.00009523976,0.00013798905,0.00027067206,0.00012753338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023811955,0.000075589945,0.00012968623,0.00008180041,0.0004654457,0.0007426571,0.0000150662945,0.0007068788,0.000013597588],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000756485,0.00007020309,0.0016726438,0.00006926615,0.0000324705,0.000003841609,0.008698767,0.0000054775264,0.00041186408,0.9867577,0.0004797151,0.0017223911],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059801474,0.0006399872,0.004449188,0.00012161059,0.00003167708,0.0000204484,0.0036075674,0.000014270719,0.0013859171,0.09261956,0.89636195,0.00014981985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013849546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015988859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89588225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007550452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007448598,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30824685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W301381734","doi":"","title":"Internet Denial of Service Attacks: Legal, Technical and Regulatory Issues","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Denial-of-service attack; Internet privacy; Computer security; Revenue; Business; Government (linguistics); Denial; Stalking; Internet service provider; Service (business); Computer science; Law; Political science; World Wide Web; Finance","score_opus":0.02096618055943347,"score_gpt":0.2965563797856557,"score_spread":0.27559019922622224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W301381734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90301794,0.012447438,0.0024311575,0.080257855,0.00052634947,0.00015765222,0.000002669324,0.000071671944,0.0010872736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99066484,0.0006152043,0.0055327127,0.002099479,0.00039705602,0.0000014276266,4.9178544e-7,0.00001266906,0.000676104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780595,0.00010406127,0.00080485723,0.00029333294,0.00072690245,0.00026491052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986849,0.000108932756,0.00032649835,0.0003054712,0.00036380943,0.00021042174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091438176,0.00024023691,0.0006106343,0.00014501878,0.00013630376,0.00014571525,0.00053056295,0.00034684,0.000015483798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008803358,0.00017445761,0.00014227572,0.00021329302,0.00055074715,0.0007278484,0.0004836967,0.00090368773,0.0000034303018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003053441,0.00033043206,0.00094560545,0.00042949052,0.00036237968,0.00025631973,0.0056729866,0.00015838232,0.021038856,0.94887805,0.016126024,0.0054961457],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00596962,0.0037162174,0.09134329,0.0025520583,0.000348552,0.0030384625,0.001019622,0.00043346762,0.06601281,0.045845874,0.7783053,0.0014147486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047097658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001783717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9030322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004496316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001286462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7114175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096587143","doi":"","title":"The Legal Delegation of Medical Responsibility: A Comparative Framework","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Biomedical Ethics and Regulation","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Delegation; Conceptualization; Legislature; Public relations; Context (archaeology); Business; Order (exchange); Action (physics); Health care; Political science; Law; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.04623468116306778,"score_gpt":0.38355282097835863,"score_spread":0.33731813981529085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096587143","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.338836,0.004227566,0.0011088427,0.65532976,0.00021446556,0.00011222192,0.0000017771108,0.0000104326955,0.00015894676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920995,0.0007139475,0.0012731499,0.00491175,0.00086974166,7.1594343e-7,0.0000013894054,0.000008100618,0.000121676356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965903,0.00035838713,0.0008431136,0.00015441241,0.0019022566,0.0001514934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99748147,0.00091771164,0.0003754339,0.00014252047,0.00056378247,0.0005190566],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028682235,0.00012542596,0.0005369357,0.00005495507,0.00015269038,0.000044797085,0.0001673125,0.00090293674,0.000060531365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019257811,0.00006456986,0.00017392775,0.00024476618,0.0025111625,0.00010244906,0.00007002184,0.0028148508,0.0000016108459],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0061979224,0.00029864642,0.00061518344,0.0005737444,0.0005319603,0.000248398,0.010200745,0.000019095372,0.009672363,0.9332004,0.010241228,0.028200286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033713866,0.004280588,0.039550714,0.0021694608,0.00037654542,0.00091339205,0.0034079012,0.0084892325,0.008110374,0.061751306,0.86726236,0.0003167343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000020252884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008548669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8714491,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022780616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006177077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114977971","doi":"","title":"State Regulation over Operations with Military Goods as an Protection Element of a State National Security","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Economic Sanctions and International Relations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Element (criminal law); State (computer science); License; Sanctions; National security; Order (exchange); Control (management); Business; Law; Computer security; International trade; Political science; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Management","score_opus":0.03035691500505091,"score_gpt":0.27459227667864217,"score_spread":0.24423536167359125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114977971","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810898,0.00075476774,0.0034815199,0.012792514,0.00011954964,0.00015602937,0.00009362977,0.00000947006,0.0015027276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975914,0.00019043633,0.001066909,0.0006356168,0.00018217265,0.000004895006,0.00000945675,0.00001018258,0.00030894787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998766,0.000041444,0.0007844554,0.00017633986,0.00014274073,0.00008899938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916655,0.00002961724,0.00033710187,0.00007230279,0.0002715129,0.00012293673],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061045657,0.000101353275,0.00026460874,0.00014726516,0.00010371968,0.000040098912,0.00007975689,0.00010176181,0.0002843126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012903188,0.00008745453,0.00007714476,0.00012053212,0.00012472797,0.00069428905,0.00001965746,0.00041332588,0.000008360849],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006021944,0.00031005862,0.006384449,0.00008886349,0.00034450242,0.000005346293,0.0050174943,0.04595262,0.0014380038,0.9378454,0.0013785491,0.00063252763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034077864,0.004006144,0.16248201,0.00018514117,0.000050148778,0.00012305586,0.00060254754,0.14717235,0.0025525768,0.504894,0.17392875,0.0005954692],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027398326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000935473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43295136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000075518314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010301724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35662922},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176314956","doi":"","title":"Administrative and Legal Regulation in the Field of Subsoil Use in Ukraine and Foreign Countries","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Legal, Health, Environmental and COVID-19 Challenges","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsoil; Legislation; Political science; State (computer science); Administrative law; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Law; Field (mathematics); Public administration; Geography; Environmental science","score_opus":0.03330552804395808,"score_gpt":0.3511521810594128,"score_spread":0.3178466530154547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176314956","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91327804,0.007382908,0.0000041383705,0.078909524,0.000022802757,0.00008456947,0.0000026192877,0.000001783066,0.0003136167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914555,0.004632661,0.00017165285,0.003379121,0.00011159767,0.0000012536559,0.0000016408163,0.0000051783386,0.00024139359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987957,0.00018441994,0.00043403034,0.00013488317,0.00033473526,0.0001162515],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903244,0.00057770667,0.00014460916,0.00009290776,0.00006417402,0.000088150286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007079401,0.000104941595,0.00035405532,0.00007163074,0.00004875119,0.00003426369,0.00003620898,0.0002384317,0.000018644881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025732693,0.00006459057,0.000039052073,0.00007916387,0.00033908134,0.00021779748,0.00002725026,0.00075295207,1.09071664e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.007882297,0.001661211,0.280972,0.0044795624,0.00034531424,0.006272207,0.041594077,0.000033167504,0.02053088,0.6238207,0.002424702,0.009983836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003548449,0.0024411546,0.9036845,0.0009896681,0.000100054785,0.0019416508,0.00803151,0.00009447337,0.00874182,0.009382824,0.06085278,0.00019112937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016293766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005300045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6227125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026632666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014889361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3271244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3182658448","doi":"","title":"Issues of Subsidy on International Trade: A Case Study Between the United States and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subsidy; Opposition (politics); Duty; International trade; Political science; Economics; International economics; Law","score_opus":0.049169992868311085,"score_gpt":0.2730090761750033,"score_spread":0.22383908330669222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3182658448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94857454,0.0022860365,0.000002244156,0.048600975,0.00024267411,0.000044875836,0.00007205101,0.000002141294,0.00017447479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997697,0.001005044,0.00004595159,0.000890442,0.0002133381,4.504101e-7,0.0000042780243,0.000007011721,0.00013647869],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989663,0.000053691387,0.0006388034,0.00014363369,0.00008532816,0.00011226849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923855,0.00017438218,0.0003268356,0.00011407936,0.000047077665,0.00009910241],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006068822,0.00010309208,0.00038521306,0.00008444621,0.00008497408,0.000072708666,0.00012227087,0.00010680005,0.000032580883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093046176,0.00007779066,0.000056282523,0.00008277124,0.00012925956,0.000098237775,0.000041563482,0.0004967466,5.1793614e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020111284,0.0005985862,0.81080157,0.00013446288,0.0018051917,0.0046816473,0.010312703,0.0008791314,0.000036059064,0.15205812,0.016947834,0.0015435491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018856263,0.0008067256,0.38180324,0.00009791382,0.00008491843,0.0020627293,0.01918123,0.00045335502,0.00045876572,0.011682492,0.5811265,0.00035648036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11010967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033126164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5641787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042166055,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006580239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98451674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}